HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10201992 - 2.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON Costa�
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County
DATE: October 14, . 1992
SUBJECT: DOUGHERTY VALLEY STATUS REPORT AND REVISED SCHEDULE
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Acknowledge receipt of the revised schedule and urge the
staff, our consultants, the County Planning Commission and San
Ramon Regional Planning Commission to strive toward the
adherence of the schedule. The schedule recommends a special
meeting of the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, November 24,
1992 .
2 . Acknowledge the efforts of Supervisors Schroder and';»McPeak3in
working informally with officials from the City 6'i.`-San Ra"mon,
the Town of Danville and the City of Dublin to gain,. a better
understanding of the area's issues and concerns. , .
3 . Clarify that in addition to hearing the proposed Dougherty
Valley General Plan Amendment and proposed Dougherty Valley
Specific Plan, that the same two Commissions are to review the
proposed Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plans (PDP) .
Since the County Planning Commission is the officially
designated Commission for the General Plan Amendment and the
Specific Plan, it should continue as the lead in the review of
the two rezoning and preliminary development plan
applications. Once the Board of Supervisors has established
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATU
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEND B D COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
e
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON October 20, 1992 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
In addition, the Board reinstituted its previously cancelled November 24 ,
1992 Board Meeting.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT III TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE '
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Harvey Bragdon (646-2026) ATTESTED October 20 , 1992
cc: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County Counsel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Public Works
BY ,DEPUTY
JWC:kd
f
I
Dougherty Valley Status Report and revised schedule
Continued- Page Two
the planning policies, all subsequent proceedings (e.g. final
development plans, vesting tentative maps) shall be heard by
the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission.
4 . The Zoning Administrator shall hear and make recommendations
regarding the development agreements which will be based on
the preliminary development plans. The recommendations shall
be presented to the Board for consideration with the other
pending applications.
FISCAL IMPACT
No additional costs since this augments the procedures described in
the June 23, 1992 Board Order.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
1. To date three joint hearings have been held by the County
Planning Commission and the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning
Commission. The revised schedule is shown on the attached
sheet. It calls for the environmental consultants to forward
the Final EIR to staff on October 30, 1992 . The Zoning
Administrator will take action on the final EIR on November 2 ,
1992 . This will allow for commissions to have the completed
document for their fourth joint public hearing on Wednesday,
November 4, 1992 .
Reports from the commission will be forwarded to the Board for
its first public hearing on Tuesday, November 24, 1992 .
2 . As authorized by the Board, Supervisors Schroder and McPeak
have been meeting on a regular and intense schedule with
elected officials of Danville, San Ramon and Dublin to work
toward a better understanding of the various issues the
proposed development of the Dougherty Valley might create.
3 . The June 231 1992 Board . Order outlined the procedure for
adoption of the General Plan amendment and Specific Plan. The
rezoning and preliminary development plan (PDP) applications
for both Windemere and Shapell will consist of adoption of the
Specific Plan as it relates to each project site, with some
added conditions of approval. Since the County Planning
Commission is the designated hearing body for the Specific
Plan and since the Specific Plan will form the basis of the
PDP, the County Planning Commission should be designated the
official advisory hearing body for those applications.
Consistent with this concept, once the Board establishes
County policy for the area, subsequent applications (e.g.
final development plans, vesting tentative maps) shall fall
under the jurisdiction of the San Ramon Valley Regional
Planning Commission for implementation.
4. Development agreements which will outline the responsibilities
of the County and the developers for implementing this project
are contemplated in the original set of approvals for the
project. The Zoning Administration shall serve as the hearing
body for these agreements. Upon action by the commissions on
the project applications, the development agreements can be
finalized to conform to commission intent. Those agreements
should be considered by the Board concurrently with the PDP
hearings in November and December.
IWC:kd
sjw.2.w.p.m
I
DOUGHERTY VALLEY GENERAL PLAN/SPECIFIC PLAN REZONING SCHEDULE
10/23/92 County to JSA w/comments on DFEIR
10/30/92 FEIR to County
11/2/92 ZA rec. to BOS cert.
11/4/92 Jt. Co. Planning Commission/SRVRPC
Hearing - then closed
11/12/92 SRVRPC decision
11/17/92 Co. PC decision
11/24/92 BOS 1st public hearing
12/8/92 BOS 2nd public hearing
12/15/92 BOS decision
. HEB:gg
9/18/92
2. 4a
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on October 20, . 1992 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, Torlakson, McPeak
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Reinstated November 24, 1992 Board Meeting
In keeping with its policy to cancel a Board meeting that falls
within the week of a major holiday, the Board cancelled its November
24, 1992, Meeting. Staff advised the Board this day of the number of
.items that need to be heard in November, and therefore requested the
Board to reinstate its November 24, 1992, meeting.
Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that
its meeting of November 24, 1992, is hereby REINSTATED.
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown, �i
ATTESTED: I9�� �o , /i-7 z
PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board
cc: County Departments of Supervisors and County Administrator
By r_, r.I+�_.Deputy
i
c to,
f:,Fb GO? -IV to
16!rl"'2;Pd vt)A ylftu"O OW5 10