Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10061992 - TC.5 r' s' 7-.Jig, �- Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa n. FROM: TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE ; . _ - Count} DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 ,,, q cOUN� SUBJECT: ACCEPT •ANNUAL TDM REPORT FOR PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA AND APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH CONTRA COSTA CENTRE ASSOCIATION FOR 1992-93 TDM PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) i BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept the Annual Report of the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Program; 2. Approve, in substantially the form presented together with any changes approved by County Counsel, an agreement with the Contra Costa Centre Association, in the amount not to exceed $261,710, for the TDM Program for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area, and authorize its signature by the Chair of the Board; 3. Direct the Community Development Director to charge up to $25, 000 to the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee account for costs related to monitoring the TDM Program, providing staff services to its TDM Advisory Committee, and performing an audit. 4. Direct the Auditor-Controller to deposit $16,000 to the Contra Costa Center Association Van Replacement Account for van depreciation costs for the 1992-93 fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT None to the County General Fund. The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Program for 1992-93 would require the appropriation of up to $286,710 from the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account. These funds were derived from Assessment District 1983-1, which was formed as a funding mechanism to allow developers of the Pleasant Hill BART station area to "prepay" required development fees, including the costs of implementing a transportation system management program for the area. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: B YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF. COUNTY #DMINISTRATOR X . RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : R14 Schroder Tom Torlakson ACTION OF BOARD ON b, I99oZ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E DATE BHOWN. Contact: Daniel Pulon . (6146-2131) ATTESTED L �- 6,/907_1 Orig: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: Contra Costa Centre Association (via) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ltrns/2CCA.bos D BY DEPUTY BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS In April 1992 , the County adopted a revised Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area to encourage employee use of alternative modes of transportation to mitigate the traffic impacts related to development in the area. The ordinance requires the Contra Costa Centre Association to submit to the County an Annual TDM Report, including an employee transportation survey, that reflected the TDM Program progress of area developers. During the past year, the Centre Association implemented a very successful vanpool program and completed other TDM activities as outlined in the annual report. As a step toward self sustaining, a van depreciation account had been established, along with procedures. to provide for van replacements. Revenues from the 1991-92 vanpool program totaled approximately $30,000. Accordingly, the Association had an unexpended fund balance of approximately $42 , 565 as of September 30, 1992. The agreement provides that $16, 000 of this surplus be deposited in a special account for depreciation expenses. This would reduce the surplus to $26,565. Annual TDM Report The Contra Costa Centre Association's 1992 Annual TDM Report is transmitted to your Board with this report (Exhibit A) . This is the third annual report under the revised County Ordinance. While the ordinance set an objective of a 1.15 AVR by 1993, the survey indicates that the 1992 AVR is 1.19. Ten percent of the responding employees used BART, 11% carpooled, and 2 % used vanpools. The vanpool program has been successful in attracting long-distance commuters. Staff believes that during the next fiscal year, efforts should be directed to carpooling and transit, as well as the vanpool program, so that the 1. 19 AVR can be surpassed. Agreement for 1992-93 An agreement to continue funding the Centre Association's TDM program during 1992-93 from the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account is included in Exhibit B. Activities for this year will include TDM information and promotion, assistance in forming carpools, vanpool marketing, Shuttle and vanpool operations and maintenance, TDM events, the annual TDM survey, and updating of the Centre Association's TDM Program. The proposed TDM budget for 1992-93 totals $288,275. $26,565 from the 1991-92 agreement that was not expended will be carried over, resulting in the 1992-93 agreement total of $261,710. A separate account has been established by the County for depreciation expenses- associated with the operation on the vanpools so that the vehicles can be replaced when they reach 125,000 miles, considered by Caltrans to be their useful life. The agreement provides for a review of expenditures following each calendar quarter and for reimbursement to the Centre Association for actual expenditures. Last year's agreement ran from August 1, 1991 to September 30, 1992 to allow sufficient time to complete an employee survey by July of each year as required by the County's TDM Ordinance and the submittal of an annual report. Thereafter, future agreements will cover a twelve month period from October 1 to September 30 each year, allowing sufficient time for compilation and review of Annual Reports prior to approvals of each new agreement. County Monitoring and staff Liaison Activities County monitoring and staff liaison activities related to this program include staffing the Pleasant Hill Station Area TDM Advisory Committee, which meets every two months, and conducting quarterly reviews of the expenditures of the TDM program. In addition, an audit will be performed at the discretion of the County. The total costs for these activities are estimated to be $25,000 for the 12-month term of the agreement. Status of Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account was created in 1984 when bonds were sold by the County in Assessment District 1983-1. The assessment included $ 1,026,000 to fund measures that would mitigate the traffic impacts "of office and commercial development in the area. In November 1984, $1,000, 000 of those funds were loaned to the County Redevelopment Agency, since they would not be required until development occurred. In December 1989, the Redevelopment Agency repaid $500,000 to the TDM Fee Account and owes the remaining balance of $500,000 plus accrued interest. As of September 11, 1992, the available balance in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account was approximately $690,000 excluding the funds held by the Redevelopment Agency. Based on the proposed budget, these funds could fund the TDM program for approximately two additional years. 1trns/2CCA.bos d EXHIBIT B PROJECT AGREEMENT PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA TDM PROGRAM 1992-93 1. Agreement Identification, Department: Community Development Department Subject: Allocation of Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account for TDM Program 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", for its Department named above, and the. following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Contra Costa Centre Association Address: 1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 180 Walnut Creek, California 94596 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is October 1, 1992 and it terminates September 30, 1993 unless sooner terminated as provided herein subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 4. Payment Schedule. County's total payments to Contractor under this agreement shall not exceed $246,275. County shall make quarterly payments to Contractor equivalent to actual expenditures for the preceding quarter except that County will advance $30,000. to contractor to fund operations during the first -quarter. Payments shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: October 15, 11992 advance payment of $30,000. February 15, 1993 reimbursement for October 1 - December 31 May 15, 1993 reimbursement for January 1 - March 31 August 15, 1993 reimbursement for April 1 - June 30 November 15, 1993 final reconciliation for 1992-93 agreement County reserves the right to withhold any part or all of any payment if questions regarding expenditures arise which cannot be resolved 'to the satisfaction of the County. 5. County's Obligation. County shall make those allocation payments to ,the contractor described in paragraph 4, Payment Schedule, fo'r the work described in Exhibit A hereto, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances contained or incorporated herein. County shall perform program monitoring and financial oversight. 6. Contractor's obligations, Contractor shall 1 _ q provide those services and carry out that work as described in the "TDM Project Work Program, 1992-1993, Pleasant Hill BART Station Area, " a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by this reference, ' subject to all the terms, conditions and certifications contained or incorporated herein. Contractor shall provide a quarterly statement of expenditures to the County with appropriate backup documentation within twenty days following the end of each calendar quarter. 7. Status. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an .employee of the County; any person(s) employed by the Contractor . shall not be considered an employee(s) of the County. Any . program established or operated by the Contractor as part of the "TDM Project Work Program" shall not be considered a program of the County. 8. Insurance. Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the term hereof insurance protection against liability for damages for personal bodily injuries (including death) and for property damage, whether the property of one or more claimants, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence (combined single limit) for combined bodily injury and property damage liability as required under the State of California Vanpool Acquisition Grant Program and naming the County of Contra Costa as additional insured, and requiring 30 days' written noticeof policy lapse or cancellation. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save and hold harmless the County and its officers and employees from any and all claims, costs and liability for any damages, injury, or death arising directly or indirectly from or connected with the services provided hereunder, due to claimed or alleged to be due to negligent or wrongful acts of the Contractor or arising from the Contractor's implementation and management of the services provided hereunder, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the County, and will make good to and reimburse the County for any expenditures, in reasonable attorneys fees the County may make by reason of such matters and, if requested by the County, will defend any such suits at the sole cost and expense of the Contractor. 10. Depreciation. County will deposit $16,000 into the fixed asset reserve account in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Fee Account for replacement of the vans operated by the Contractor. Contractor will deposit into this account on a quarterly basis that portion of payments received from vanpool riders that represents depreciation expenses. 11. Project. This Agreement implements in whole or in part the TDM Program for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area as i provided for under the Pleasant Hill BART State Area Assessment District TDM Fee Account, and as more particularly described in the "TDM Project Work Program, " attached hereto. 12. Changes to' Work Program. Any changes to the attached work program shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Director of Community Development and the contractor, and may include reallocations of funds within the project budget to reflect the revised work program. 13. Disputes. Disagreements between County . and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 14. Termination. County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, upon providing written notice to Contractor, for failure to carry out the terms of this Agreement, including the terms incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Upon such termination, Contractor shall, without delay, deliver to County all materials and records prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, and shall be paid, without duplication,I all amounts due for the services rendered up to the date of termination. County shall implement the enforcement provisions of Article 532-2.10 ofICounty Ordinance No. 92-31 prior to terminating this Agreement pursuant to the above paragraph. S 14. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR; BY: BY: Sunne McPeak, Chair Contra Costa Centre Board of Supervisors Association DATE• DATE: ATTEST: Phil Batchelor County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors BY: and County Administrator DATE: BY: Deputy Recommended by Department BY: Harvey E. Bragdon, Director Community Development Department Form Approved: County Counsel BY: ' Deputy 1trns/cm/CCCA.bos ATTACHMENT A TDM PROJECT WORK PROGRAM, 1992-93 PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Operate and expand the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program required as traffic mitigation for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area including implementing a vanpool program for employees in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area; providing an on-site TDM Coordinator; establishing special events/recognition awards activities; operating the shuttle program; updating the TDM Program; and conducting marketing for vanpooling, carpooling, and other alternatives to single occupant vehicle commutes. B. PROJECT GOALS 1. To achieve, as a minimum, an average vehicle ridership (AVR) of 1.15 by July, 1993 in compliance with TDM Ordinance No. 92-31. 2. To comply with the provisions of TDM Ordinance No. 92-31 and to effectively use the TDM Fee Account established to mitigate traffic impacts within the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area. C. PROJECT ACTIVITIES Project activities include retention of a part-time on-site TDM coordinator with clerical assistance to carry out the Contra Costa Centre Association's Transportation Demand Management Program (TDM) , including but not limited to the following: TDM information and promotion program, assistance in forming carpools, vanpool program marketing, lunch time shuttle and vanpool operations and maintenance, TDM events at employment sites, annual employee survey, update Contra Costa Centre Association TDM Program, i D. QUARTERLY REPORTS Contractor shall submit quarterly reports to the County on the status of funds expended, balances remaining, and a brief narrative of the project/activity status as required in Item 6 of the Project Agreement. Reports shall be submitted 20 days following the end of each calendar quarter. E. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor will attain an average vehicle ridership of 1.15 among Contra Costa Centre Association member employees within the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area by July, 1993. Contractor will submit quarterly financial reports. F. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM Program will be administered by Lynette Tanner, Executive Director for the Contra Costa Centre Association, and implemented by Linda Young, TDM Coordinator for the Contra Costa Centre Association. Monitoring will be performed by the County TDM Coordinator. A financial audit may be requested and performed under the direction of the County. a. PROJECT BUDGET The following project budget has been developed to guide expenditures for the Contra Costa Centre Association TDM program. This budget covers the period, October 1, 1992 through September 30, 1993. item Estimated Expenditure Salaries $31,326 Executive Director 616 hours x 19.23 TDM Coordinator 936 hours x 15.87 Clerical 514 hours x 9.00 Overhead (0.64 x salaries) $20,049 TDM Program Marketing $25,000 Newsletter/Flyers/Poster/Printing $12,500 Guaranteed Ride Home $ 5,500 Driver/Rider Incentive $ 1,000 Program Promotion Expense $ 3,500 Marketing Incentives $ 2,000 Survey Promotion $ 10000 TDM Program Contingency $ 5,000 RIDES Consulting $ 3,000 Annual Commute Survey Analysis TDM Events $ 7,000 On-site events at each building Equipment Purchase $25,000 3 vans for Commute/Shuttle service (vans plus conversions CCCA pays 30% of purchase and conversion, Measure C Funding Grant pays 70%) Shuttle Operations (M-F/10:30-2:30120 min. $80,000 frequency to three retail centers) '4 Operators $50,000 ` Fuel $18,000 Maintenance $10,000 Miscellaneous $ 2,000 Vanpool Maintenance & Operations (8 vans) $70,400 Vehicle Registration $ 2,000 Insurance $34,000 Cleaning/Servicing/Repairs $ 1,000 Tires $ 3,000 Fuel $20,000 Emergency Road Service $ 200 Bridge Tolls $ 200 Maintenance/Back-up Van Rental $10,000 Vanpool Vehicle Depreciation $16,000 1 Financial Services $5,500 Quarterly Financial Statements CONTRA COSTA CENTRE ASSOCIATION COSTS $288,275 less 1991-92 fund .balance - $ 26,565 1992-93 AGREEMENT TOTAL ." $261,710 COUNTY COSTS $ 25,000 Program Monitoring Staffing TDM Advisory Committee $20,000 Financial Management/Audit $5,000 ltrns/cm/CCCA.boe F r.. , i : - COSTA 1 . CENTRE „ . .I ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONTRA.'COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF., SUPERVISORS .. ON THE TRANSPORTATTON 'SYSTEMS .MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.. . .. , . ..PLEASANT* HILL BART STATION AREA ' 1 JULY 1992 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS r Page No. ' INTRODUCTION TDM Ordinance 92 - 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 r BACKGROUND PH/BART Specific Plan 2 PH/BART Station Area TDM Ordinance . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Contra Costa Centre Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 rPH/BART Station Area TDM Advisory Committee . . . . . . . 3 TDM COMPLIANCE rPrimary Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Good Faith Effort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 r SUMMARY OF TDM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: NON-RESIDENTIAL ' Contra. Costa Centre Association . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 rIndividual Buildings Bank of the West . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Citibank9 Embassy Suites 9 Pacific Plaza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 PacTel Corporate Plaza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ' Station Plaza . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Urban West I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Western Financial Savings Plaza . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ' 3000 Oak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ' TDM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL Cherry Lane Residential Developments . . . . . . . . . . 11 r TDM ACTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 r TDM SURVEY SUMMARY tContra Costa Centre Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) ' Page 2 ' EXHIBIT A ' TDM Ordinance Area Boundary PH/BART Specific Plan Area County Boundary Location of Major Development Projects Affected by Ordinance ' EXHIBIT B Inventory of Projects .within Jurisdiction of PH/BART Station Area TDM Ordinance No. 92-31 1 EXHIBIT C Contra Costa Centre Association ' Commercial Development Projects EXHIBIT D ' Revised PH/BART Station Area TDM Ordinance No . 92-31 EXHIBIT E ' Contra Costa Centre Association Employee Transportation Survey and Survey Analysis 1 1 1 1 r ' 1992 ANNUAL REPORT ' TDM PROGRAM PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA ' INTRODUCTION The 1992 Annual Report details the accomplishments of the Contra Costa Centre Association Transportation Demand Management Program as required by the Contra Costa County Transportation Demand Management Ordinance 92-31 . In April 1992, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted a . Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance (No. 92-31) for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area, this Ordinance supersedes the original Ordinance (No. 86-51) which was adopted in 1986 and then revised in May of 1989 (Ordinance 89-32) . The Contra Costa Centre has operated a Transportation Demand Management Program since 1986. The goal of the Ordinance is to reduce peak hour commute traffic in the unincorporated area within 3, 000 feet of the Pleasant Hill BART Station. Exhibit A illustrates the area affected by the Ordinance, outside of and within the PH/BART Station Specific Plan, and the major ' development projects within the ordinance area. The TDM Ordinance No. 92-31 covers the entire unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. One of the requirements of the TDM Ordinance is an annual survey which measures the level of Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) as ' established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District . The Contra Costa Centre AVR for 1992 is 1 . 19, which exceeds the goal for 1993 . Within the Contra Costa Centre Association, there are 2, 300 residential units proposed, of which approximately 1, 500 have been built to date, as well as nine completed office complexes (totaling 1, 169, 500 square feet) and one hotel (216, 400 square feet) . The total number of employees at the site is 2, 786. The ' total project area at buildout will include 16 buildings with a total of 2, 332, 180 square feet and a projected population of approximately 8, 000 employees which will be affected by the provisions of the Ordinance. ' Exhibit B lists an inventory of both residential and non- residential projects within the PH/BART Station Ordinance area. ' Exhibit C provides more detailed information for both the proposed and completed major commercial development. i 1 l 1 ' BACKGROUND ' PH/BART, Station Specific Plan. The PH/BART Station Specific Plan was adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in June, 1983 . As part of the Conditions of Approval for the majority of commercial developments approved on or after December 1, 1982 in the PH/BART Station area, TDM programs are required. The PH/BART Specific Plan calls for a total of 3, 726, 866 square feet of non-residential development, 2, 043 to 2, 443 residential units, and 850 hotel rooms . PH BART Station Area TDM Ordinance. The PH/BART Station Area TDM Ordinance was adopted on April 21, 1992, following a cooperative process involving both the public and private sectors . The Ordinance places responsibility on employers and developers in the Station Area to encourage their employees and tenants to use alternative forms of transportation, such as BART, bus, vanpools, carpools, bicycles, walking, etc. Specifically, the ordinance requires : 1 . The use of alternative modes of transportation other ' than the single occupant vehicle; 2 . Increased efficiency of the existing transportation network; 3 . Overall coordination between the public and private sector to encourage consistency in planning and implementation of transportation programs; 4 . To reduce traffic impacts within the County and Region ' by reducing the number of automobile trips, daily parking demand, and total vehicle miles per person traveled that might otherwise be generated by commuting; and 5 . To contribute, as one component of a broader air pollution reduction strategy, to achieving the Regional Air Quality goals as established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. ' The Ordinance requires that the County appoint a TDM Coordinator to: ' • Review and approve all TDM Programs and content. ' • Develop, for submittal to the Board of Supervisors for approval, rules, regulations, forms, guidelines and procedures for submittal of. transportation surveys, annual reports, and TDM Programs . ' 2 ' • Oversee the administration and implementation of the Ordinance. ' • Annually submit a summary report to the Board of Supervisors and TDM Advisory Committee describing the results of transportation surveys, annual reports, and success of TDM Programs in satisfying the purpose and goals of the TDM Ordinance. • Recommend changes to the ordinance as necessary to meet goals, purpose, and objectives . Contra Costa Centre Association. The Contra Costa Centre Association (CCCA) was incorporated in 1985 by the individual property owners in the Station area. The CCCA is a non-profit association, formed to provide a mechanism for owners and developers in the Station Area to work together to achieve the goals of the TDM and Child Care Ordinances. The CCCA through individual property owners has financed public improvements to roadway and drainage systems through an assessment district . In addition, the Association is also financing and implementing programs aimed at solving circulation and mitigating the impact of newly developed projects in the area. PH/BART Station Area Advisory Committee. In accordance with the TDM Ordinance, the PH/BART Station Area Advisory Committee was created to ensure cooperation and coordination between public agencies and private sector groups, as well as to advise the Board of Supervisors and County TDM Coordinator on all TDM matters in the Station Area. IIn addition, the Committee may make recommendations on all appeals from decisions of the County TDM Coordinator, may consider and render advice on any TDM matter brought to its attention by any party, and may at anytime recommend changes to the TDM ordinance as necessary to meet its goals, purpose, and objectives . The PH/BART TDM Advisory Committee is comprised of two Station Area employer representatives, a representative of the Station 1 Area residential projects, a BART representative, two members of the CCCA, one member-at-large, one member from the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority and one representative each from the cities of Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, and Concord. Committee members are persons within the area affected by the Ordinance or who have specific technical knowledge about the operation of TDM ' Programs . ' 3 ' TDM COMPLIANCE Primary Objective. The primary TDM objective of the TDM Ordinance is to achieve a shift 'in commute modes such that at least 1 . 30 (AVR rate) of all employees in the Station area commute to and from work in alternative modes of transportation other than the single occupant vehicle by the year 1997 . The primary TDM objective for the Contra Costa Centre is staged so that at the time of the 1993 Annual Report the goal is 1 . 15 AVR; 1994 goal is 1 .20 AVR; 1995 goal is 1 .25 AVR and the 1997 goal is 1 . 30 AVR. Good Faith Effort. Following review of an Annual Report, the County TDM Coordinator may disapprove the existing TDM Program and require the submittal of a revised TDM Program if the Contra Costa Centre Association does not demonstrate that a good faith effort is being made to meet the objectives of the TDM Ordinance. A revised TDM Program shall be submitted for approval within sixty days of written notification from the County TDM Coordinator. SUMMARY OF TDM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: NON-RESIDENTIAL Contra Costa Centre Association. The Contra Costa Centre Association (CCCA) has submitted an overall TDM Program which incorporates the individual TDM Programs for the nine completed buildings and their tenants in the immediate vicinity of the PH/BART Station Area. Brief highlights of TDM activities undertaken by the CCCA on behalf of member buildings are as follows : 1992 • Expanded the Guaranteed Ride Home Program to include ' registered carpools (prior to February, 1992 the program was open only to vanpool members) . • Completed the annual commute Survey with a response rate of 670 . ' • Held six major transportation fairs for all buildings in the Contra Costa Centre. Excellent response rated 345 requests for ridematching. Over 1, 600 people came to the Contra ' Costa Centre, BART, County Connection and RIDES For Bay Area Commuters booths for free commute information as well as a chance to win a mountain bike and other prizes . Hot dogs, sodas and chips were available to everyone employed at the Contra Costa Centre. • Updated the Vanpool Handbook. • Successfully pursued funding for three additional vans from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Measure C money. I4 ' The vans will be used for A.M. and P.M. commute and mid-day shuttles to major retail centers . • TDM staff participated in the RIDES sponsored TDM network committee. • TDM staff held a meeting with the Building Coordinators and major employers at the Contra Costa Centre to bring them up to date on the Air Quality measures, the new TDM Ordinance from Contra Costa County and to provide a network for information and training. • TDM staff became an active member of the I-680/24 Technical Advisory Committee . • TDM staff has been involved in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District draft rule making workshops as well as ' the community outreach marketing effort for the "Spare the Air Campaign" sponsored by the Air Quality District . • Produced Contra Costa Centre "Update" newsletter issue which detailed the TDM options available to employees within the Contra Costa Centre Association. 1 • Continued to market the vanpools and any seats as they become available. • Updated the "New Employee" packets which contain a welcome letter, questionnaire and commute information. These ' packets are provided to the building management staff as new tenants move in and to Human Resource departments for new hires at the businesses in the Contra Costa Centre. • TDM Staff elected Co-Chair of the Contra Costa Region "Beat the Back-up", California Rideshare Week Task Force. ' 1991 • Increased marketing of five commuter vans received through the state grant (PEVA) funds . All vans in operation by April, 1991 . Vans operate from: San Jose, Sacramento, Vacaville, Vallejo and Antioch. Three vans operate at 1000 ' passenger loads (11 passengers) , two vans operate at 90% passenger loads (10 passengers) . • Held major transportation fairs for all buildings in the Contra Costa Centre. Encouraged participation by offering hot dogs, sodas, nachos and a chance to win a mountain bike . • Prepared and distributed vanpool handbook of operation and formation procedures . • Completed annual commute survey with a 43% response rate . 1 5 1 ' • Held information "group" meetings for vanpool and carpool group formation. Groups were formed through the use of home zip code information. • Contra Costa Centre staff actively participated in the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Model TDM Ordinance production. This Ordinance will replace the Contra Costa County Ordinance and all Ordinances adopted by cities in Contra Costa County. • Currently pursuing funds from the CCTA "Measure C" - TDM allocation to purchase three additional vans for commute and noontime shuttle service. ' • Workingwith Caltrans and RIDES to promote the 1991 California Rideshare Week "Beat The Backup Day" campaign. 1 • Contra Costa Centre Staff have attended new employee premove orientation meetings . • Updated "New Employee" packets, which contain a welcome letter, simple survey and local transit flyers and other information. 1 Produced biannual newsletter, "UPDATE", which highlighted the vanpool program. • Received 1990 Best Program Award (private sector) for the TDM Program from RIDES for Bay Area Commuters. S1989-1990 ' • Received state grant (PEVA) funds to purchase five commuter vans which will be operated and marketed by the CCCA office. CCCA is within Caltrans District 4 which encompasses four Bay Area counties . Over 150 groups applied for the PEVA funds and CCCA was the only applicant to receive funds for five vans; the typical grant is only one van. • These 11-passenger vans will operate from the Pittsburg/Antioch and Benicia/Vallejo areas . ' • The PEVA grant in the amount of $87, 500 covers 700 of the purchase of the equipment . CCCA received confirmation from the County TDM Coordinator that funds will be released from the Pleasant BART Assessment District to cover the remaining 300 of the equipment purchase and help operate the vanpool program. • Hired a part-time TDM Coordinator (two days per week) , retained RIDES consulting service. • Held a major commute event during October 1989 "Rideshare Week" at Pacific Plaza for all buildings in the Contra Costa Centre. 6 ' • Set out special surveys at the commute event for people who may be interested in vanpooling. • Conducted two transportation surveys . • Completed a community relations brochure and distributed it ' among the cities, counties, and Chambers of Commerce. • Condensed our community relations brochure to a small question-and-answer brochure and mailed it to 5, 000 residents surrounding the Contra Costa Centre and also distributed 1, 000 copies at the Pleasant Hill BART Station. • Produced bi-annual newsletter, "UPDATE, " which highlighted transportation services available and planned for the future. • Held meeting with building coordinators . • Contacted local transit agency to centralize information for ' distribution to building coordinators . 1988 • Held mini-event at buildings ' request. • Contracted for training of building coordinators . • Contracted for origin/destination study of Treat Boulevard traffic. • Hired part-time RIDES transportation coordinator. • Conducted building-by-building assessment of current program. • Held meetings with designated employer representatives working under building coordinators . ' • Held second annual commute fair for all buildings with representation from RIDES, CCCTA, BART, child care providers, and residential developers . • Conducted third annual employee survey on commute modes . • Leased/installed computer link-up to RIDES ' database. • Prepared and distributed new employee kits . • Held "Don' t Drive Alone" pledge day competition for all buildings . • Helped buildings set up Transportation Information Centers . 7 ' 1987 • Designated one representative per building and established quarterly meetings . • Began publication of quarterly newsletter to promote TDM. ' • Distributed posters and flyers . • Developed new employee letter. • Held first commute fair for all buildings with representation from RIDES, CCCTA, BART, and area residential developers . • Participated on various TDM committees. ' • Made presentations to other groups on activities . • Joined Bay Area Commute Alternatives Alliance. • Began participation on I-680/24 Task Force . • Convened meetings of County coordinators to share strategies. • Began participation in regional marketing group. • Conducted second employee survey. Individual Buildings - CCCA. The following is a summary of TDM programs for each individual building that is a member of the CCCA. The buildings/tenants are listed in alphabetical order, as follows : 1 . Bank of the West, 1450 Treat Boulevard 1 The drive-alone rate is 67% . Bank of the West is a single employer; 100% occupancy; total of 561 employees . TDM Program highlights are: • On-site Transportation Events • Information distribution • On-site Employee Transportation Coordinator ' • Newsletter which includes transportation issues • New employee packets in Human Resources • Bicycle Racks • Annual Commute Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • TDM Information Center 8 ' 2 . Citibank, Treat Executive Center, 1400 Treat Boulevard The drive-alone rate is 83% . ' Citibank rejoined the Contra Costa Centre as an employer representative when the developer turned over the responsibility. ' The building is a single employer facility; 1000 occupancy; total of 262 employees . The TDM Program highlights are: • On-site Transportation Events • Information Distribution • On-site Employee Transportation Coordinators • Newsletter which includes transportation issues • New Employee packets in Human Resources • Annual Commute Survey ' • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • TDM Information Center 3. Embassy Suites, 1345 Treat Boulevard The drive-alone rate is 560 ' The Embassy Suites is the Contra Costa Centre luxury hotel and meeting facility. The hotel employs 79 people, the restaurant facility employs an additional 65 people for a total of 134 . The TDM Program highlights are as follows : • TDM Information Center • Information distribution • Employee Transportation Coordinator on-site • Annual Commute Survey • Employee Transportation Coordinator on-site • Within walking distance of BART and bus ' 4 . Pacific Plaza, 1340 Treat Boulevard The drive-alone rate is 74% . Pacific Plaza is a multi-tenant building; 100% occupancy; total of 551 employees . TDM Program highlights are: 1 • TDM Information Center • Information Distribution • Newsletter which includes transportation issues • Employee Transportation Coordinator on-site • Annual Commute Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • On-site Transportation Event • Showers for employee use • Bicycle racks • Employee Transportation Coordinator for major employer 9 ' 5. PacTel Corporate Plaza The drive-alone rate is 77% The building management at PacTel Corporate Plaza is seeking additional tenants, the occupancy rate is 600; the employee count for the single tenant is 275, the building management employees 7 . TDM Program highlights are as follows : • Information Distribution • Employee Transportation Coordinator on-site • Annual Commute Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • On-site Transportation Event • Showers for employee use • Bicycle racks • New Employee packets available in building management office • Major employer representative sits on the Contra Costa Centre TDM Technical Advisory Committee ' • Sponsorship of noontime shuttle to the downtown Walnut Creek area ' 6. Station Plaza, 3100 Oak Road The drive-alone rate is 800 . Station Plaza is a multi-tenant complex; 1000 occupied; total of 196 employees . TDM Program highlights are: ' • On-site Transportation Event • Information Distribution ' • TDM Coordinator On Site/Training • TDM Coordinator On Site for each tenant • Transportation Newsletter • Annual Transportation Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus ' 7 . Urban West I, 1350 Treat Boulevard The drive-alone rate is 780 . ' This is a multi-tenant building with 97% occupancy, 33 tenants and approximately 478 employees . The majority of tenants are small employers averaging approximately 20 employees . TDM ' Program highlights are: • On-site Transportation Events ' • Information Distribution • Employee Transportation Coordinator on Site • Annual Transportation Survey ' • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • Transportation Information Center • Showers and lockers for employee use ' • Bicycle racks 10 8. . Western Financial Savings Plaza, 1575 Treat Boulevard The drive-alone rate is 870 . This is a multi-tenant building; 100% occupancy; total of 114 employees . TDM Program highlights are : ' • Information Distribution • On-site Transportation Event • Employee Transportation Coordinator on site • Annual Transportation Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus ' • Transportation. Information Center • Showers & lockers for employee use • Bicycle racks ' 9. 3000 Oak The drive-alone rate is 53% ' 3000 Oak attracted the Levi Strauss Company as its major tenant, Levi employs 190 people, a smaller tenant plus the building ' management staff bring the building total to 212 . The TDM highlights for this building include: ' • Information distribution • Employee Transportation Coordinator on site • Annual Transportation Survey • Within walking distance of BART and Bus • Showers for employee use • Bicycle racks ' e Major employer representative sits on the Contra Costa Centre TDM Technical Advisory Committee ' TDM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: RESIDENTIAL ' Cherry Lane Residential Developments. A Transportation Systems Management Plan was submitted by Cherry Lane residential developers, which includes Treat Commons, Wayside, and Fox Creek developments. The Plan discusses several measures suitable for ' implementation in these residential developments. They are highlighted as follows : ' • TDM Coordinator/Training • TDM Information Dissemination • RIDES, Inc. Carpool/Vanpool Matching Service • Bicycle Storage • Transit Access • Annual Transportation Survey ' • Maintain Database of Resident Employers • Provide local employers with available housing in nearby neighborhoods ' • Maintain Local Job Listings 11 i ' TDM ACTION PLAN The TDM Advisory Committee is charged with both monitoring compliance with the PH/BART Area TDM Ordinance and recommending measures to reduce single occupant vehicle use. ' Traffic studies show that vehicles currently entering the PH/BART Station are: 30% from Walnut Creek residences, 40% from Concord residences, 7% from East County, and 23% from miscellaneous regional areas, including Solano County. The TUM Committee recognizes that to encourage commuters to use transportation modes other than their own car, other alternatives must be available, known to them and easy to use. TDM SURVEY SUMMARY Contra Costa Centre Association. In June, 1992, the Contra Costa Centre Association (CCCA) commissioned RIDES for Bay Area ' Commuters to complete an analysis of the commute survey which detailed commute attitudes and patterns . The analysis examined the various implementation measures which could most effectively be employed in association member complexes . In accordance with the TDM Ordinance, the survey included the following information: ' 1 . The number of employees at the workplace . 2 . The city and zip code of each employee ' s .residence. 3 . The employee' s usual work schedule. 4 . The number of employees commuting to work by mode. The following is a summary of the major points of the study: During 1992 the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance which covers the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area was revised to conform ' to conform to the rules of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) plan. The revised Ordinance No. 92-31 details specific changes to the ' Annual Transportation Survey including the measurement method of determining the amount of the use of alternative commute methods . The survey analysis details the Single Occupant Vehicle ' percentage (SOV) , which was the measurement method prior to the formation of the BAAQMD Plan, as well as the average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) rate which is the new method of measurement . Results of the survey are based on questionnaires completed by 670 of the employees (1, 859 out of 2, 786) at Contra Costa Centre. This response rate is much higher than last year. All nine buildings participated this year, compared to seven in 1991 . ' Nearly half of the Centre' s workforce live within ten miles of the Centre, and 660 live within 20 miles . The average commute distance is 17 . 5 miles . 12 ' The percentage of people who drive alone increased slightly from 70% to 730 . BART ridership remained at 100, and people who carpool, or are dropped off fell from 13% to 11% . The percentage ' of people who vanpool fell from 4% to 2% . The drive-alone rate at different buildings ranges from a high of ' 87 . % at Western Financial Services Plaza, to a low of 53 . 1% at 3000 Oak, a new tenant . The drive-alone rate at Pacific Plaza rose from 64% to 74 . 4% . ' Most (64 .2%) Contra Costa Centre employees live within the County. Almost 160 live in Alameda County, and 6. 5% live in ' San Francisco. About 71% of employees arrive at work during the County-defined morning peak of 7AM-9AM, and depart from work during the evening peak of 4PM-6PM. Ninety-five percent of the Centre employees arrive at work during the BAAQMD peak period of 6AM-10AM. The Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) at Contra Costa Centre is 1 . 19, placing it ahead of the 1993 County goal of 1 . 15. ' The Contra Costa County goal for 1992 was to achieve 300 of commuters using alternative commute modes during the morning and evening peak periods . In the morning, only 270 of the employees were not solo drivers . In the evening, the Centre achieved the goal, with 30% of the employees ridesharing, using transit, bicycling, or walking. About 400 of the commuters had heard of the Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Over half the respondents knew that the Contra Costa Centre Association provides commute information and ridematching services . Half the people got their information at transportation fairs . ' A complete analysis and survey methodology can be found in Exhibit E of this report. i 1 ' 13 EXHIBIT.A ITDM:ORDINANCE AREA BOUNDARY PH/BART SPECIFIC PLAN AREA COUNTY BOUNDARY LOCATION OF MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AFFECTED.BY ORDINANCE.' i•' PLEASANT HILL BART SPECIFIC PLAN AREA LOCATION OF MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AFFECTED BY TDM ORDINANCE ' A STATION PLAZA LEGEND J BANK OF THE WEST HEADQUARTERS OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING B STATION OAKS K WESTERN FINANCIAL SAVINGS PLAZA OFFICE COMPLEX OFFICE BUILDING C 2950 BUSKIRK L BART JOINT DEVELOPMENT OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE COMPLEX ' D PACTEL CORPORATE PLAZA M 3000 OAK ROAD OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE COMPLEX E TREAT TOWERS N THE COMMONS OFFICE COMPLEX CONDOMINIUMS F EMBASSY SUITES O MADISON HOTEL CONDOMINIUMS G PACIFIC PLAZA P CENTERRE PLACE OFFICE BUILDING APARTMENTS 1 H URBAN WEST BUSINESS PARK Q THF PREMIERE OFFICE COMPLEX APARTMENTS I CITIBANK HEADQUARTERS R PARK REGENCY ' OFFICE BUILDING RESIDENTIAL LEASING UNITS PLEASANT HILL BART -•- REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY BOUNDARY y _ LOODPX9 DRIVE ... 3 t`owtiaP WPP-RpnPry w.N.mr I k. a . NN l l - — .ti P , R .-O O. :k • I' A o. i •'T'f,!'I;.� _ O �• �I \ 'tip, LAS JUNTAS war 2`•1 r-1 �l'A�l '4 ,F BART ON ••7 - `I 5...:. y ����. �A. elI yw-F�rw •.\ I p�.. L Y -1 IYY�W z--- D Z7rt ��C+ ' 1 I - - - �- -W E .�' u Wpf } PypnP y F r-. a ,...I�:.R7�TT•f. - '•1'1 ' --.--:.���, 3� wnir..+. .,,P v.,.v�..P�Cann m `"•..� Ame, ! 1�RS SEAT 8... E �.._--- ny"gym"n r r"7717T). - K nr� ' TI G r 16 ' T �,` : DCTION: R03ECTS WITHIN JURIg1 �NENTOR Op.HtBART 5TATIUN.AREA'. ;; TDM ORDINANCE NO.9.2 31 EXHIBIT B PH/BART STATION AREA INVENTORY OF PROJECTS AFFECTED BY THE PH/BART TDM ORDINANCE NO. 92-31 1 # of Within Specific Plan Area Project Type Units Sq. Ft. 1. BART Station Property BART Station --- 1,265, 000 2. Oak Court * Office --- 205,700 3. Embassy Suites * Hotel 288 4. Treat Towers * Office --- 375, 000 5. HOMART * Hotel 254 6. Fox Creek Las Juntas Way Condos 59 7. 3000 Oak * Oak Road & Las Juntas Wy Office 102,000 8. Station Plaza * Oak Road Office 51, 000 9. Fidelity National Oak Road Office 10. Wayside Plaza/ City Homes Coggins Road & Las Juntas Way Condos 350 11. Diablo Oaks Apartments 255 Coggins Road Apartments 12. Hillman Properties * (Undeveloped) Treat Boulevard Office 1.05 Acre 13. Pacific Plaza Building * Oak Road & Treat Boulevard Office 253,584 14. Urban West Buildings * 1350 Treat Boulevard Office 500, 000 15. Park Regency Apartments 892 Outside Specific Plan Area - Within TDM Ordinance Area 16. Office Park 146 Mayhew Way at Oberson Office 17. Coco's Restaurant 146 Mayhew Way At Oberson Restaurant 18. Flambeau's Restaurant ' 205 Coggins Drive Restaurant 19. Cherry Lane & Del Hombre Lane, Vacant Parcels 20. Reflections Apartments Del Hombre Lane Apartments 360 ' 14 EXHIBIT B Page 2 Outside Specific Plan Area - Within TDM Ordinance Area (cont'd) # of 1 Within Specific Plan Area Project Type Units Sq. Ft. 21. Treat Commons I Del Hombre Lane Apartments 350 22. Treat Commons II Cherry Lane Condos 24. Muller Veterinary Hospital 1411 Treat Bl.& Del Hombre Ln Office 3,200 25. Ryder Building (Treat Travel & Northwestern Title Co. ) 1425 Treat Boulevard Office 26. Delpac Mortgage 1485 Treat Blvd. & Cherry Lane Office 27. Better Homes Realty 1511 Treat Blvd/Cherry Ln Office 28. Law Offices 1555 Treat Blvd/Alderwood Road Office 29. Western Financial Savings * 1575 Treat Boulevard Office 30,000 30, Citibank Building* 1400 Treat Blvd./Hedgewood Office 80, 000 31. Bank of the West * 1640 Treat Blvd/Cherry Ln Office 122, 000 32. Bianchi's Nursery School 2850 Cherry Ln/Treat Blvd. Daycare Center 33. Four-Plexes 2190 and 2186 Jones Road Four-Plex 34. Palmer School 2740 Jones Road School 35. Suttermill North Condos 2720 Jones Road Condos 36. Oak Road Villas 270-2725 Oak Road 37.Hamptons, New Construction Condos ' 2708 Oak Road Condos 38. Station West Condominiums 2751, 2771 Oak Road Condos ' * Members of Contra Costa Centre Association 15 EXdiDiT C A5SOCIATION . GONT�C()STA DEVELOPMENT FR. 1 EXHIBIT C PH/BART STATION AREA CONTRA COSTA CENTRE ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS No. of Est. 9 Size Parking Occup. Current Empl. at Using Building Name (Sq.Ft.) Spaces 07/31/92 Employees Buildout TDM+ Station Plaza 51, 000 165 95% 150 158 20 3100 Oak Road Pacific Plaza * 253,500 662 80% 516 919 40 Urban West I * 125, 000 356 82% 309 350 21 Bank of the West 128,300 338 100% 550 550 17 1450 Treat Blvd. Western Financial Savings Plaza 30,000 75+/- 80� 100 125 9 1575 Treat Blvd. PacTel Plaza 205,700 655 OH 0 800 NA (Taylor-Woodrow) Urban West II-IV 358,680 1,250 0% 0 1,435 NA (Urban West) I Station Oaks 300,000 1,483 0% 0 1, 018 NA (HOMART) Hotel 254 Rooms 0 180 NA 1 Treat Towers 375,000 1, 176 0 1, 190 NA (W.0 North Joint Venture) 3000 Oak 102,000 311 96% 212 354 47 Embassy Suites 194, 000 128 OSS 134 249 44 Citibank 80,000 200 100% 262 262 17 Totals 2,203,180 6,799 % avg. 2,740 7,601 27 avg Complete to Date: 1, 169,500 sq. ft. Class A Office Space + Source - 1992 Commute Survey ' 16 �• I 1T D Is ,�ATION ��EU Y ANCE; 0. 97,- ;9231' p�IN TDM ;GNT�� CGST� ORDINANCE NO.92- 31 g2 '�PR 27 All g , TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows ' (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code) : SECTION I . SUMMARY. This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 87-95, on transportation systems management, and Ordinance No. 89-32, the amended Pleasant Hill Bart Station Area TSM ordinance, and replaces the requirements of these repealed ordinances with division 532, Transportation Demand Management, and chapter 82- 32, added to the County Ordinance Code. SECTION II . Division 532 and chapter 532-2 are added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: DIVISION 532 TRANSPORTATION Chapter 532-2 Transportation Demand Management Article 532-2 . 2 General 532-2 . 202 Findings. The Board of Supervisors finds and determines as follows . (a) There has been a significant increase in new employment and housing opportunities in Contra Costa County, and this trend is anticipated to continue in the future. (b) Recent growth and increased development and redevelopment within the County will lead to increased traffic coming to, from, and within the County. (c) Transportation Demand Management ( "TDM" ) programs have been shown to be capable of reducing vehicle trips and increasing vehicle occupancy rates and can be simple, effective and reduce the need for major road improvements. ' (d) Decreasing the number of vehicular trips, both absolutely and within peak traffic periods, will help alleviate traffic congestion, energy consumption, and noise levels, and will help to improve and maintain air quality. These improvements contribute to making the County an attractive and convenient place to live, work, visit, and do business, and will 1 help employers recruit and retain a qualified work force. (e) Cooperation with and coordination of TDM programs with other cities, counties, transit agencies, the private sector, and 1 . agencies in the region will assist the County in meeting the purposes of this phapter. (f) Adoption of this chapter is one component of a comprehensive approach to TDM that should be supported by complementary land use policies, residential TDM strategies, and transportation improvements. (g) Adoption of this chapter is in the best interests of the public's health, safety, and general welfare, both within the County and the region, and is consistent with the County's general plan. (h) Participation of employees and employee organizations is critical to the successful implementation of this chapter. (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) 532-2 . 204 Pu oses Goal and Ob ectives . (a) Purposes . In recognition of the findings in section 532-2.202, the purposes of this chapter are: ( 1 ) To promote and encourage use of alternatives to commuting by single occupant vehicle for individuals working in the County; ( 2 ) To promote efficient use of the existing transportation network; (3) To encourage consistency in planning and implementation of transportation programs between public jurisdictions and the private sector; (4 ) To reduce traffic impacts within the County and region by reducing the number of automobile trips, daily parking demand, and total vehicle miles per person travelled that might otherwise be generated by commuting; and (5) To contribute, as one component of a broader air pollution reduction strategy, to achieving the regional air quality goals as established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. (b) Goal. The goal of this chapter is to assure that existing and future employers and complexes in the unincorporated areas participate in mitigating traffic impacts by implementing TDM measures. (c) Objectives . The objective of this chapter is for all Apra 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92-31 2 1 employers and sponsors of complexes with 100 or more employees to achieve an average vehicle ridership of 1 .30 by 1997 in accordance with the following schedule: Reporting AVR Year Tarcret 1993 1 .15 1994 1 .20 ' 1995 1.25 1997 1 .30 (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) 1 532-2. 206 Definitions . As used in this chapter, the following words and phrases have the meanings ascribed to them in this section. (a) "Alternative work hours program" means any system for shifting the work day of an employee so that the work day starts or ends outside of the peak periods . Such programs include, but are not limited to: 1) compressed work weeks; 2) staggered work I hours that involve offsetting the fixed work hours of employees at the workplace; and 3) flexible work hours involving individually determined work hours within guidelines set by the employer. (b) "Average vehicle ridership" ( "AVR" ) means the number of persons reporting to the work site between 7 :00 AM and 9 :00 AM, including those participating in a telecommuting program, divided by the number of passenger vehicles, excluding buses and bicycles, arriving during the same period. 1 (c) "Car pool" means a motor vehicle occupied by two (2) or more individuals .(the driver and at least one passenger) traveling together for commute purposes . 1 (d) "Commute" means a home-to-work or work-to-home trip. (e) "Complex" means either: (1) Any business park or other non-retail, non- residential project in separate or common ownership, which can be identified by two or more of the following characteristics: a) It is known by a common name given to the project by its developer; b) It is governed by a common set of covenants, ' conditions, and restrictions; April 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 3 c) It was approved, or is to be approved, as an. - entity by the County; d) It is covered by a single tentative or final ; subdivision map; or (2) Any multi-tenant building or group of buildings under common ownership with a total of 100 or more employees. (f) "Complex TDM coordinator" means a representative of a complex sponsor designated to implement a TDM Program and to carry out any other requirements of this chapter at the complex. (g) "Employee" means any person hired by an employer, other than independent contractors and part-time, temporary, and seasonal employees. (h) "Employer" means any public or private employer, with a permanent place of business in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. "Employer" does not include retail establishments, contractors without a permanent place of business in the County, any other business without a permanent place of business in the County, and government agencies exempt by state or federal law. (i) "Peak periods" means the hours from 7 :00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4 :00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday. ( j ) "Pleasant Hill BART Station Area" means the portion of the unincorporated area of the County included in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Pian adopted by the board on June 7, 1983 . (k) "Project" means a proposal for the development of land, requiring a land use entitlement, whether residential or nonresidential, or both, which conforms to county requirements . The term "project" includes the conversion of an existing use to a different use, and expansion of a use. (1) "Public transit" means publicly- provided transportation, usually either by bus or rail, available to users at a fixed cost per ride. (m) "Ridesharing" means transportation of persons in a motor vehicle for commute purposes where the driver is not employed for that purpose. The term includes arrangements known as car pools, van pools, and bus pools. (n) "Sponsor" means the owner(s) or developer(s) of a project or complex. April 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 4 (o) "TDM program" means any combination of activities, programs and actions at the workplace or complex, selected by the employer and implemented by the workplace or complex coordinator, that are designed to encourage the use of telecommuting, public transit, van pools, car pools and bicycles as alternatives to ' commuting by single occupant vehicles. (p) "Telecommuting" means working at home or at a location ' other than the customary place of work using telecommunications technology in order to eliminate commute trips. (q) "Transportation demand management" ( "TDM" ) means a program to reduce the demand for transportation during peak periods by regulatory or incentive techniques. (r) "Transportation management association" means a voluntary organization of employers, property owners/managers, transit operators and other transportation agencies to plan and implement commuter services for members' employees, tenants, or users. (s) "Van• pool" means a van occupied by five (5) or more ' individuals traveling together for commute purposes . (t) "Workplace" means the permanent or predominant place of employment of an employee. u "Workplace TDM coordinator" means a person, including a ( ) P g company employee, designated to implement a TDM program and to carry out any other requirements of this chapter at the workplace on behalf of the employer. (Ord.. 921 § 2. ) 532-2. 208 Limitations . Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require an existing employer or complex sponsor to utilize TDM measures which would constitute a breach of an existing lease, or which would require structural modifications or additions to property, the nature of which would require the issuance of a building permit. (Ord. 92-21 § 2. ) ' Article 532-2.4 Administration 532-2.402 County TDM Coordinator. The director of community development is the county TDM coordinator unless the board designates another person or organization to perform this function. The county TDM coordinator shall be responsible for 4r1I r, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 5 the administration, implementation and enforcement of this chapter and chapter 82-32, and, in furtherance thereof, shall : (a) Develop rules, regulations,. procedures, and forms for the submittal of transportation surveys, annual reports, and TDM programs; (b) Review and approve all TDM programs; ' (c) Serve as staff to the TDM advisory body; (d) Submit, on an annual basis, a summary report to the 1 board and the county TDM advisory body describing the results of the transportation surveys, and the efforts of employers and complex sponsors in attaining the goal, purposes, and objectives established in this chapter; (e) Recommend changes to this chapter as may be necessary to meet its goal, purposes, and objectives; and (f) Assist employers in the development and implementation of TDM information programs . (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) 532-2 . 404 TDM Advisory Body. The board may form, ' independently or in conjunction with other jurisdictions, a TDM advisory body. (a) Composition. The members of the TDM advisory body shall be appointed or designated by the board and may include elected officials, representatives of business, representatives of labor, the development industry, transit service providers, ' and local residents. (b) Term of Office. The term of office for the TDM advisory body shall be two years, except that a member's term shall not expire until the appointment and qualification of a successor. A member may be reappointed for consecutive terms . ' (c) Functions . The TDM advisory body shall have the following functions: (1) Make recommendations on all appeals from decisions of the county TDM coordinator on TDM programs; (2) Advise the board and the county TDM coordinator on any TDM matter brought to its attention by any party; (3) Recommend changes to this chapter as may be April 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92-31 6 ' r necessary to meet its goal, purposes, and objectives; and (4 ) Make recommendations to the board concerning formation of transportation management associations within the County or with neighboring jurisdictions to help employers and.. sponsors comply with the provisions of locally adopted TDM ' ordinances . (Ord. 92- 31 § 2.-) ' 532-2.406 Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Advisory . Committee. The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area advisory - committee shall serve and function as the TDM advisory body in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area. ' (a) Composition. The Pleasant Hill BART Station Area TDM advisory committee shall be composed of the following members, to be appointed by the board: (1 ) One at-large member. (2) Two members representing employers. (3) One member representing residential projects . r (4) One member representing the County Planning Commission. (5) One member nominated by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. (6 ) Two members nominated by the Contra Costa Centre Association. (7 ) One member nominated by the City of Walnut Creek. (8) One member nominated by the City of Pleasant Hill. (9 ) One member nominated by the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority. ' (b) The term of office shall be two years except that a member's term shall not expire until the appointment and qualification of a successor. A member may be appointed for successive terms. (Ord. No. 92- 31§ 2. ) iArticle 532-2. 6 Complex and Employer Recuirements April 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 ' 532-2.602 Requirements. TDM requirements shall apply to employers and complex sponsors, as set forth in this article. (Ord 92-31 § 2. ) ' 532-2 . 604 Workplace or Complex TDM Coordinator. All employers with 100 or more employees and all sponsors of complexes with 100 or more employees shall independently, or in ' cooperation with other- employers or complex sponsors, designate a TDM coordinator with responsibilities for: (a) Implementing and administering the workplace or complex ' TDM program; (b) Preparing and submitting baseline and annual transportation surveys and reports; (c) Acting as liaison with the county TDM coordinator; and (d) For complexes, coordinating TDM efforts of individual employers within the complex. (Ord. 92- 31 § 2 . ) 532-2 . 606 TDM Program. All employers with 100 or more ' employees, and all sponsors of complexes with 100 or more employees shall prepare, submit and implement a TDM program in accordance with the requirements of this section. ' (a) Content. ' A workplace or complex TDM program shall include the following components: -- ( 1 ) TDM Information Program. A TDM program shall include an information program, requiring posting and disseminating materials describing public transit, ridesharing, ' and non-motorized commuting opportunities available to employees . Informational materials shall be furnished by the county TDM coordinator and the employer. Updated information relating to public transit, ridesharing, telecommuting and non-motorized commuting opportunities shall be disseminated to all employees at the time such information is provided to the employer and to new employees when hired. (2) TDM Measures. A TDM program shall identify specific strategies that will be implemented at the workplace or complex which are designed to encourage the use of public transit, van pools, car pools, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting. Lpsil 2. 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 11 8 ' ' (3) Objective. A TDM program shall be designed to achieve the objective set forth in subdivision (c) of section ' 532-2 .204 . (4 ) Coordination. A TDM program for a complex with multiple employers shall outline a process for monitoring and assisting in the development and implementation of TDM programs of employers within the complex. ' (b) Submittal. A draft TDM program shall be submitted to the county TDM coordinator ninety (90) days after the county TDM coordinator provides written notice to an employer or complex ' sponsor to prepare a TDM program. (c) Annual Report. Every employer and every complex sponsor required to prepare a TDM program shall submit an annual ' report to the county TDM coordinator. (1) Submittal. The report shall be submitted by August 1 for the immediately preceding July 1 to June 30 period. (2) Contents . The report shall contain sufficient information to allow the county TDM coordinator to evaluate the ' extent and results of the TDM measures employed. The annual report shall contain information as required by the county TDM coordinator, including: ' a) A description of the measures taken to comply with this chapter; rb) Changes, if any, proposed to the TDM program for the ensuing year; 1 - c) The results of the most recent annual survey required pursuant to section 532-2.608, including computation of the average vehicle ridership for the employer or complex; d) The cost to implement the requirements of this chapter for the reporting period; e) The number of off-street parking spaces available to employees; and ' f) The number of off-street parking spaces available to non-empkgyees. (Ord. 92- 1 §2. ) 32-2. 5 608 Annual Transportation Survey. Every employer and every complex sponsor required to prepare a TDM program shall April 2. 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 9 submit to the county TDM coordinator, as part of the required annual report, survey information that includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) The number of employees at the workplace; _ (b) The city and zip code of each employee's residence; (c) The scheduled time at which each employee arrives at the workplace; and (d) The method of commuting for each employee. (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) - ' 32-2 . 610 Emiplovers , Twent or More Employees . All employers with at least twenty but fewer than 100 employees, and all employers located in complexes occupied by at least twenty but fewer than 100 employees, shall comply with the requirements of this section. (a) Annual Transportation Survey. The employer shall submit a transportation survey to the county TDM coordinator annually, on or before June 30 of each year. Transportation survey information shall include: (1 ) The number of employees at the workplace; (2) The city and zip code of each employee's residence; (3) The scheduled time at which each employee arrives and leaves the work place; and i (4) The method of commuting for each employee. (b) TDM Information Program. The employer shall implement or participate in a TDM information program that consists of posting and disseminating materials describing public transit, ridesharing, and non-motorized commuting opportunities available to employees. (1) Dissemination. Information material shall be furnished to the employer by the county TDM coordinator. Updated information relating to transit, ridesharing, and non-motorized commuting opportunities shall be disseminated to all employees at the time such information is provided to the employer and to new ' employees when hired. (2) Submittal . The TDM information program April 2 1442 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 10 description shall be submitted to the county TDM coordinator- within two months after the effective date of this chapter.- (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) ' Article 532-2.8 Evaluation of TDM Programs 532-2.802 Good Faith Effort. Following review of an annual report, the county TDM coordinator may disapprove an existing TDM program and require the submittal of a revised TDM program if the employer or complex sponsor does not demonstrate that a good ' faith effort is being made to meet the objectives of this chapter. A revised TDM program shall be submitted for approval within sixty (60) days of written notification from the county TDM coordinator. (Ord. 92- 31 § 2) . ' 532-2 .804 Review of TDM Programs. The county TDM coordinator shall review and approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove a TDM program within thirty days of receipt. If no ' decision is made within the thirty day period, the TDM program is deemed app oved. (Ord. 92- § 2. ) 532-2 . 806 Appeal to TDM Advisory Body or Board of pp ry v Supervisors . If the county TDM coordinator disapproves or conditionally approves a TDM program, the employer or complex sponsor may, within thirty days of such decision, appeal the county TDM coordinator's decision to the TDM advisory body stating the grounds for appeal. The TDM Advisory Body shall hear the appeal and render an advisory opinion within sixty days of the appeal date. Such opinion may include recommendations as to the adequacy of the TDM program being appealed and what further components, TDM measures, or conditions are recommended. If an opinion is not rendered within the sixty-day period, the TDM program is deemed to be recommended for approval. If a TDM ' advisory body has not been formed, the TDM coordinator's decisions may be appealed to the board within thirty days of the decision. ' (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) ' 532-2.808 Review by Board of Supervisors. Within sixty days of the advisory opinion of the TDM advisory body, or decision of the TDM coordinator if .a TDM advisory body has not been formed, the board may hear and approve, conditionally April 2, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 ' 11 ' approve, or disapprove the TDM program. Failure to act within the sixty-day period will result in the automatic approval of the TDM program. ' (Ord. 92- 2. ) ' 532-2.810 Revised Program Upon Disapproval. Within thirty days of disapproval of a TDM program by the board or the county TDM coordinator, if such decision has not been appealed, the ' employer or complex- sponsor shall submit a revised TDM program to the county TDM coordinator. (Ord. 92- 31 § 2. ) 532-2 . 812 Amendment. An amendment to an approved TDM program may be approved at any time by the county TDM ' coordinato (Ord. 92- 3;1, § 2. ) Article 532-2. 10 Enforcement 532-2. 1002 Violation. An employer or complex sponsor who ' fails to comply with any requirement of this chapter, after thirty days notice to remedy such failure, shall be subject to the enforr�Tment provisions of division 14 . ' (Ord. 92- § 2. ) 532-2 . 1004 Pleasant Hill BART Station Area. (a) Due to its location adjacent to a BART station and the concentration of large employers, certain violations of this chapter in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area warrant stricter enforcement measures . Therefore; notwithstanding section 532-2 . 1002, section 14-8.002-does not apply to an employer or complex sponsor in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area who fails to submit a TDM program in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. ' (b) Misdemeanor. Any employer or complex sponsor located in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area who fails to submit a TDM program in accordance with the requirements of this chapter, t after thirty days notice to remedy such failure, is guilty of a misdemean (Ord. 92- § 2. ) ' N - SECTIO III. Chapter 82 32 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: Chapter 82-32 Transportation Demand Management April 10, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 ' 12 ' 82-32 . 002 Definitions . As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings : ' (a) "Project" means a proposal or application for the development of land requiring a land use entitlement, whether residential, nonresidential, or both, which conforms to county requirements. "Project" includes the conversion of an existing ' use to a different use, and expansion of a use. (b) "Sponsor" means the owner or developer of a project. ' (Ord. 92- 33. § 3. ) 82-32. 004 TDM Requirements . The requirements of this ' chapter and chapter 532-2 shall apply to all projects . (Ord. 92- 31 § 3. ) ' 82-32 . 006 Prosect. 100 or more Employees . All sponsors of projects that will have 100 or more employees shall prepare, ' submit, and obtain approval of a TDM program in accordance with the requirements of section 532-2.608 prior to final project approval. (Ord. 92- 31 § 3. ) 1 82-32 . 008 Off-Street Parking Reductions . Sponsors of ' projects may qualify for reductions in off-street parking requirements . Sponsors requesting parking reductions shall . submit a conceptual TDM program to the community development department with the submittal of an application for the project. If the tenant is known, the project sponsor and tenant shall jointly submit a conceptual TDM program. ' (a) Conceptual TDM Program. The conceptual TDM program shall identify TDM measures sufficient to attain the anticipated trip reduction. The county TDM coordinator shall review the ' project's conceptual TDM program and make a recommendation on the proposed parking reduction to the component of the planning agency hearing the project application. ' (b) Final TDM Program. The design and implementation of a final TDM program shall be a condition of project approval . The project sponsor shall provide deed notification to all purchasers ' or lessees f mandatory participation in the final TDM program. (Ord. 92- 3� § 3. ) 82-32 .010 Residential Projects . Sponsors of residential projects shall prepare and implement a TDM information program in accordance with the requirements of this section. 1 April 10, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 1 ' 13 1 ' -(a) - Owner-Occupied Units . Every sponsor selling or offering for sale a residential dwelling to a prospective buyer shall notify and offer to that buyer, as soon as it may be done, materials describing public transit, ridesharing, and non- motorized commuting opportunities available in the vicinity of the development. ' (b) Rental Units . Every sponsor renting or offering for rent a residential dwelling shall notify and offer to the prospective tenant, as soon as it may be done, materials ' describing public transit, ridesharing, and non-motorized commuting opportunities in the vicinity of the development. (Ord. 92- 31 § 3. ) 82-32 .012 Deed Notification. The project sponsor shall provide deed notification to all purchasers or lessees of any TDM requirements imposed pursuant to this chapter, or chapter 532-2 . (Ord. 92- 31 § 3 . ) SECTION IV. REPEAL. Ordinances Nos . 87-95 and 89-32 are hereby repealed. SECTION V. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective thirty days after passage, and within fifteen days after passage shall be published once with the names of Supervisors voting for and against it in the Contra Costa Times a newspaper published in this County. PASSED and ADOPTED on April 21 . 1992 by the following vote: iAYES: Sunervi.5ors Powers , Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson, McPeak ' NOES: _None ABSENT: None ' ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: PHIL BATCHELOR Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator ' Deputy Clerk Chair, Board of Supervisors [SEAL] LTF:ct ' DA6at\eln.ltf April 10, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 92- 31 14 r COSH A GNTitE NURyY'::. r �z iAT10 1`1 ?OIR Y51's O YtiY SURVE EM• . r� CONTRA COSTA CENTRE EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY JULY, 1992 i i 1 t 1 1 i Prepared by: Valerie York RIDES Planning and Research 1 Executive Summary Results of the survey are based on questionnaires completed by 67% of the employees (1,859 out of 2,786) at Contra Costa Centre. This response rate is much higher than last year. All nine buildings participated this year, compared to seven in 1991. Nearly half of the Centre's workforce live within ten miles of the the Centre, and 66% live within 20 miles. The average commute distance is 17.5 miles. The percentage of people who drive alone increased slightly from 70% to 73%. BART ridership remained at 10%, and people who carpool, or are dropped off fell from 13% to 11%. The percentage of people who vanpool fell from 4% to 2%. The drive-alone rate at different buildings ranges from a high of 87.5% at Western Financial Services Plaza, to a low of 53.1% at 3000 Oak, a new tenant. The drive- alone rate at Pacific Plaza rose from 64% to 74.4% Most (64.2%) Contra Costa Centre employees live within the county. Almost 16% live in Alameda County, and 6.5% live in San Francisco. About 71% of employees arrive at work during the County-defined morning peak of 7AM-9AM, and depart from work during the evening peak of 4PM-6PM. Ninety- five percent of the Centre employees arrive at work during the BAAQMD peak period of 6AM-10AM. The Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) at Contra Costa Centre is 1.19, placing it ahead of the 1993 County goal of 1.15. There is no goal for 1992. The Contra Costa County goal for 1992 was to achieve 30% of commuters using alternative commute modes during the morning and evening peak periods. In the morning, only 27% of the employees were not solo drivers. In the evening, the Centre achieved the goal, with 30% of the employees ridesharing, using transit, bicycling, or walking. About 40% of the commuters had heard of the Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Over half the respondents knew that the Contra Costa Centre Association provides commute information and ridernatching services. Half the people got their information at transportation fairs. Table of Contents Methodology.................................................................................................................2 CommuteMode...........................................................................................................2 CommuteMode over Time......................................................................................3 ' Commute Distance......................................................................................................5 1 Commute Mode by Building.....................................................................................6 Countyof Residence.................................................................................:..................7 ArrivalTime.................................................................................................................7 DepartureTime............................................................................................................8 WorkSchedule.............................................................................................................9 Telecommuting............................................................................................................10 Changes in Commute Mode.............:.......................................................................10 Disincentives to Ridesharing....................................................................................11 Commute Alternative Information........................................................................12 Average Vehicle Ridership and Peak Period Goals.............................................13 Conclusions and Recommendations......................................................................13 Contra Costa Centre 1992 Contra Costa Centre is located in an unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, surrounding the Pleasant Hill BART station. Since 1986, the Centre has been subject to a special Transportation System Management ordinance, which requires the Centre to attempt to reduce the number of solo drivers working at the Centre. The main goal of the ordinance is to get a certain percentage of commuters out of their single-occupant vehicles and into commute alternatives during the peak period. Peak period is defined as 7AM-9AM and 4PM-6PM. This target for 1992 is 30%; it has increased by 5% each year since 1990, when it was 20%. Next year, it will stabilize at 35%. This year, further legislation will affect Contra Costa Centre. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), responding to the California Clean Air Plan, will implement a rule concerning trip reduction. This rule is currently in draft form, but is expected to be finalized in the fall. At this time, the draft rule addresses all companies with more than 100 employees, but does not discuss multi- tenant complexes such as Contra Costa Centre. Even though the rule will not apply until next year, a goal of this report is to approximate the provisions of the rule so that Centre staff have an idea of where they stand. The nine buildings at the Centre coordinate their trip reduction efforts through the Contra Costa Centre Association (CCCA). The County Trip Reduction Ordinance mandates that each employer conduct an annual transportation survey of employees to measure progress. The CCCA conducts this survey for all employers at the Centre. Contra Costa Centre has grown over the last few years. In 1990, the first year that RIDES analyzed the employee survey results, the Centre had 1,570 employees. This year, the tenancy totals 2,786 people in nine buildings. Ultimately, the Centre will have 8,000 employees in eleven buildings. The nine current buildings are: Bank of the West* 561 employees Pactel Corporate Plaza 282 employees Embassy Suites Hotel 134 employees Urban West Communities 474 employees Pacific Plaza 551 employees 3000 Oak 212 employees Station Plaza 196 employees ' Western Financial Savings Plaza 114 employees Citibank* 262 employees ' Total 2,786 employees *Citibank and Bank of the West are the only tenants in their buildings. Citibank did not participate in the 1991 survey. 1 1 ' Methodolog Surveys were distributed to all employees at Contra Costa Centre in late May, 1992. A high response rate was especially important this year, in anticipation of the BAAQMD's draft rule. The draft rule for large employers dictates that a survey must achieve a 75% response rate. If it doesn't, all persons who do not respond are assumed to be solo drivers when calculating Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR). In case the (as yet unwritten) multi-tenant complex rule contains the same provision, the CCCA attempted to get a 75% response rate. Unfortunately, only 1,859 people responded, meaning that the response rate was 67%. While inadequate from the BAAQMD's point of view, this is a very high response rate, particularly when compared with last year (43%) and the previous year (37%). For the purposes of this report, it means that the data quality is ' excellent, and the resulting picture of commuter behavior is extremely accurate. The table below shows the response rate at each building. ' # of Employees Response Rate % of Surveys Bank of the West 561 65.1% 19.6% Pactel Corporate Plaza 282 47.2% 7.2% Embassy Suites Hotel 134 86.6% 6.2% Urban West Communities 474 87.6% 22.3% ' Pacific Plaza 551 30.5% 9.0% 3000 Oak 212 98.6% 11.2% Station Plaza 196 78.6% 8.3% Western Financial Savings Plaza 114 49.1% 3.0% Citibank 262 92.7% 13.1% Total 2,786 66.7% 100% It is clear in the above table that Pacific Plaza brought the average response down. It is the second largest building, and got the lowest response. To make up for situations like this, the overall data is weighted so that each building has a response proportional to its size. The responses of the Pacific Plaza tenants are weighted more heavily, while the responses from 3000 Oak are weighted less heavily. When looking at data for the Centre as a whole, this ensures that the picture is representative of variations attributable to the differences between buildings, such as employer size. Commute Mode ' In 1991, the percentage of solo drivers at Contra Costa Centre (CCC) dropped from 77% to an all-time low of 70%. In 1992, the percentage rose slightly to 72.9%. While a bit disheartening, there are a number of reasons why it is not surprising, and, most likely, not permanent. ' 2 One major change from 1991 to 1992 is in the number of survey responses. This year, 67% of the tenants responded, while last year, only 43% did. It is widely believed, although not documented, throughout the Transportation Demand Management community that people who do not drive alone to work are more likely to respond to transportation surveys than people who do. (This is the reasoning behind the BAAQMD's 75% response requirement.) So, the incidence of solo driving may appear greater simply because more people turned in surveys. The increase may also be attributable to the growth of the Centre. Tenancy increased by more than 20% during the past year. Sometimes it takes new employees a little while to become disgruntled with driving, or they need to get settled before they are willing to alter their schedules to accommodate a carpool or transit. Usually people are more open to alternatives right when they relocate, especially if they are presented with viable options at that time. This suggests that perhaps greater efforts should be made to work with new employees. Commute Mode - 1992 Number Percent Drive alone 1,354 72.9% BART 181 9.7% 2-person carpool 159 8.6% Walk 46 2.5% Vanpool 38 2.0% I3+person carpool 33 1.8% CCCTA Bus 25 1.3% Bicycle 11 .6% Dropped Off 10 .5% ' Total 1,857 100% Commute Mode over Time As the table on the following page shows, the number of people driving alone dropped precipitously in 1990 and 1991 before increasing slightly in 1992. Until this year, the steadily increasing size of Contra Costa Centre probably played a large role in the abatement of solo driving. As the Centre got bigger, it was easier to find ridesharing partners, and incentives such as preferential parking were more meaningful. ' The historical view makes it tempting to treat this year's upswing in solo drivers as an aberration, especially since the fundamental elements of the Centre's TSM program have improved over the years. 1 3 Commute Mode Over Time Mode 1287 1988 1982 124 1991 192 Drive Alone 81% 82% 83% 77% 70% 73% Carpool/Dropped off 10% 13% 10% 10% 13% 11% BART 6% 4% 3% 9% 10% 10% Bus 1% 1% Vanpool — — — — 4% 2% ' Walk — 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% Bicycle 1% 1% 1% ' The increase in solo drivers appears to be correlated to the decrease in carpoolers and vanpoolers. While the number of vanpoolers appears to have declined, this may be due to the fact that not all vanpoolers completed the survey. Some vanpool riders told the CCCA that they intentionally did not return the survey. Most of the carpools going to Contra Costa Centre have two people in them, as the following graph displays. Percent of Total 100.0% 82.3% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 10.9% 6.3% ' 0.0% 2 3 4 1 Number of People in Carpool The number of people in vanpools varies more widely, showing that not all the ' vanpools are filled at all times. This corresponds to the decrease in vanpool usage. Percent of Total 70.0% 61.1% 60.0%.- 50.0%.. 40.0% ' 30.0% 19.4% 20.0% 8.3% 5.6% 10.0% �� = 2.8°10 2.8% 0.0% ' 4 8 9 10 11 12 Number of People in Vanpool ' 4 ' Commute Distance The following table shows how far Contra Costa Centre employees live from work. Almost half of all commuters live within 10 miles from the Centre, and two-thirds live within 20 miles of work. The average one-way commute distance is 17.5 miles, the same as it was in 1991. Number Percent 0-5 miles 485 28% 6-10 miles 271 16% 11-20 miles 409 23% 21-40 miles 446 26% More than 40 miles 139 8% 812 100% The numbers have changed very little from year to year. Five percent more commuters live from 21-40 miles from work, and 3% fewer live from 6-10 miles away. One-Way Commute Distance Over Time Distance 1989 19990 19911 19922 0-5 miles 28% 33% 28% 28% ' 6-10 miles 21% 16% 19% 16% 11-20 miles 24% 20% 23% 23% 21-40 miles 18% 25% 21% 26% More than 40 miles 4% 6% 9% 8% ' The reason behind the chane in commute modes in 1992 is partially revealed b g P Y Y looking at commute modes at various distances. ' Commute Mode by Distance ' One-way distance Drive alone Cargool Vanpool BART Bus Other 0-5 Miles 79.8% 5.5% 2.1% 2.5% 11.0% 6-10 Miles 86.3% 8.1% 3.3% 2.2% ' 11-20 Miles 78.0% 12.4% 2.0% 7.1% .5% 21-40 Miles 64.3% 13.5% 2.0% 19.3% .4% More than 40 Miles 56.1% 22.3% 11.5% 10.1% ---- The information in the table above suggests that the drive-alone rate would have dropped in 1992, rather than risen. The distance group with the highest percentage of solo drivers, 6-10 miles from work, lost three percent from year to year. The group with the second lowest drive-alone rate, people living 21-40 miles from work, actually gained five percentage points. All the year-to-year changes are very small, and only incrementally add up to the higher drive-alone rate. There is no single factor which explains the increase. ' 5 Lookingat the drive-alone rate at different distances over the last three ears shows y that the real increase in solo drivers occured in groups that live more than 20 miles from the Centre. This is a bit odd, because these people generally have the most incentives to carpool and vanpool. ' Drive-Alone Rate One-way distance ILM im 142 ' 0-5 Miles 85.3% 77% 79.8% 6-10 Miles 91.4% 86% 86.3% 11-20 Miles 84.5% 78% 78.0% ' 21-40 Miles 60.8% 57% 64.3% More than 40 Miles 48.5% 55% 56.1% Commute Mode by Big The percentage of commuters driving alone varies from a high of 87.5% at Western Financial Plaza, to an incredibly low 53.1% at 3000 Oak. Embassy Suites continues to have a low drive-alone rate. Since the average for the Centre is 72.9%, it is easy to see which buildings are contributing the most to congestion. Commute Mode by Building Drive alone Transit Car 1 Vanpool O#her Urban West 78.8% 8.0% 8.7% .7% 3.9% ' Bank of the West 67.1% 8.8% 15.6% 8.2% .3% Station Plaza 80.5% 2.6% 13.0% 0% 3.8% Embassy Suites 56.9% 14.7% 20.7% 0% 7.8% Pactel Corp. Plaza 77.4% 14.3% 5.3% 0% 3.0% ' 3000 Oak 53.1% 27.2% 17.2% 1.4% 1.0% Pacific Plaza 74.4% 12.5% 7.2% 1.2% 4.8% ' Western Financial 87.5% 0% 10.7% 0% 1.8% Citibank 83.1% 7.0% 7.0% 0% 2.9% ' Bank of the West lowered its drive-alone rate from 68% to 67.1% during the last year. This is somewhat surprising, in that the vanpool rate dropped from 11% to less than 8%. It appears that the former vanpoolers began taking BART and the bus. ' Urban West also improved from 1991 to 1992, lowering the drive-alone rate from 81% to 78.8%. Each of the alternative transit modes had small gains, except ' vanpools, which dropped from 4% to less than 1%. Pacific Plaza was the most surprising. In 1991, the drive-alone rate was 64%; now it is 74.4%. The number of employees actually decreased from 559 to 551. The biggest ' 6 ' change was among BART users; 20% rode BART last year, while thisear the number is 12.5%. . Y A final note about Western Financial Savings Plaza, the building with the highest drive-alone rate. About 40% of the employees there work for a real estate company, which necessitates driving to show homes. We must reluctantly admit that they may have an excuse for solo driving. County of Residence Slightly less than two thirds (64.2%) of Contra Costa Centre employees live in Contra Costa County. The next largest concentration is in Alameda County where 15.7% of the Centre employees live. The "other" counties include San Joaquin, Stanislaus, ' Napa, Sonoma, Sacramento, and Yolo. Three employees commute from Lower Lake, a small town about 100 miles north of Contra Costa Centre. A complete list of cities of residence is included in the appendix. County of Residence ' Number Perces Contra Costa 1,190 64.2% Alameda 291 15.7% San Francisco 120 6.5% Solano 87 4.7% Santa Clara 50 2.7% ' San Mateo 37 2.0% Marin 23 1.2% Other 48 2.6% ' This geographical distribution is almost identical to last year's, except that last year, Solano surpassed San Francisco. The increase in San Francisco residents who work ' at the Centre may be attributable to a new tenant, Levi Strauss. Levi Strauss was previously located in San Francisco, and many of the employees may still live there. This assertion is borne out by the high BART use (30.3%) at 3000 Oak, where Levi Strauss is now located. Arrival Time Most employees (70.6%) arrive at work in the peak period of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM as defined by the Contra Costa County Trip Reduction Ordinance. This is a big change from last year, when 85% of employees arrived during the peak period. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District defines peak period as 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM. Using this stricter guideline, 94.9% of Contra Costa Centre employees arrive at work during the peak period. 7 ' The table below shows the arrival times and drive-alone rate at each time period. Arrival Time ' Arrival Time Number Percent Drive-alone rate Before 6:00 AM 20 1.1% 88.2% 6:00-6:30 AM 64 3.5% 67.2% ' 6:30- 7:00 AM 53 2.9% 70.6% 7:01-7:30 AM 210 11.5% 75.8% ' 7:31-8:00 AM 289 15.8% 68.9% 8:01-8:30 AM 738 40.4% 72.7% ' 8:30-9:00 AM 267 14.6% 76.7% 9:00-9:30 AM 78 4.3% 75.3% 9:30-10:00 AM 35 1.9% 76.7% After 10:00 AM 73 4.0% 78.6% Last year, 48% of employees arrived at work between 8:00 and 8:30 AM. This year, they have spread themselves out a little bit. Departure Time The evening peak period as defined by the County is from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The BAAQMD does not have an evening peak period. ' just like in the morning, 71% of the Centre's employees leave between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. In 1991, 85% of employees left work during the evening peak period. When a change of this magnitude happens in both the morning and evening ' commutes, over such a short period of time, it suggests that there is some sort of external influence. The dispersion of the employees may be part of the reason why the drive-alone rate ' increased. The number of solo drivers is usually lowest at peak times, due to the availability of ridesharing partners, and transit schedules designed for commuters. ' The table on the following page shows the commute modes at different departure times. ' 8 Departure Time Departure Time Number Percent Drive-alone rate Before 3:00 PM 55 3.1% 72% ' 3:00-3:29 PM 34 1.9% 72% 3:30- 3:59 PM 76 4.3% 76% ' 4:00-4:29 PM 142 8.0% -80% 4:30-4:59 PM 267 15.1% 64% 5:00-5:29 PM 645 36.5% 71% 5:30-5:59 PM 201 11.4% 77% 6:00-6:29 PM 201 11.4% 64% ' 6:30-6:59 PM 77 4.4% 71% After 10:00 PM 67 3.8% 77% ' Work Schedule Most survey respondents work a "normal" schedule, Monday through Friday. However, nearly 8% are permitted to work a compressed work week. There are three common types of compressed schedules: 9/80, or nine days, eighty hours, with one ' day off every two weeks, 4/40, or four days, forty hours, with a day off every week, and 3/36, or three twelve-hour days each week. One hundred and forty-four people responded that they could work a compressed week. Only 121 of these people, or 6.5% of the total, actually do work a compressed week. It is very interesting to note that the overwhelming majority do not work one of the "typical" compressed schedules. ' Percent of People who Work Compressed Schedules 80.0% 74.4% ' 70.0% .- 60.0% .. 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% -- 20.0% .. 15.7% 10.0% 6.6% 3.3% 0.0% ' '9/80' '4/40' '3/36' Other 9 One of the most important reasons to ask survey respondents about their use of compressed schedules is to calculate Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR). Employers get credit when their employees drive to work less frequently. In this case, it is impossible to tell how many days are being saved. Future surveys should ask respondents to explain their schedules. The unusually high number of respondents who worked "other" schedules indicates that there may have been a misunderstanding. (Someone who only works part time is not considered to be on a ' compressed schedule.) ' Telecommuting Like compressed schedules, telecommuting is a way for employees to do an t equivalent amount of work, but drive less often. At Contra Costa Centre, only 5.2% of all employees are permitted to telecommute, and of those, only 63, or 3.4% of the total, ever take advantage of the opportunity. ' About half of the people who telecommute work at home one or two days a month. The other half work anywhere from three days a month at home, to four people who ' say they work 20 days each month at home! Sometimes people misunderstand the idea of telecommuting. It only counts if you work at home instead of going to work, not if you work at home in addition to going to work. The people who said they work ' every day at home may just be putting in a lot of overtime. Changes in Commute Mode ' Survey respondents were asked if they maa had de permanent change in their commute mode in the last year. Two hundred and thirty-one people, or 12.4% said ' they had, and identified their previous mode. Of these people, about 50% had switched from driving alone to a different commute mode. The most common alternative that solo drivers switched to was BART, with carpooling close behind. Among people who converted to solo driving, most were former BART users. Another large group had previously carpooled. All the mode changes did not have ' an effect, positive or negative, on the drive-alone rate, because an equal number shifted from solo driving and shifted to solo driving. Many of the people making changes are new employees, however. ' It is difficult to draw conclusions from the mode shifts, because there are so many reasons for making a change, some of which cancel each other out. The most common reason for changing commute mode was due to a change in work location (40.5% of the respondents). The next most common was a change in home location (19.5%). Slightly more than 18% said that a combination of money, stress, and time ' led them to change their commute mode. One factor is important, however. When people change their commute modes due to a change in work location, there is a golden opportunity to induce them to 10 rideshare. Changing work location g g was the most common reason for changing ' commute mode this year, and it is likely to be the most common reason in the future. New employees should be targeted for ridesharing marketing efforts. ' Disincentives to Ridesharing Solo drivers were asked what discourages them from carpooling, vanpooling, or ' using transit to get to work. They were allowed to give as many reasons as they wished; most people gave two reasons. The percentages in the table below show how many respondents out of all solo drivers gave that answer. Reason Number Percent ' Irregular Hours 597 44.1% Need Car for Personal Use 418 30.9% Don't Want to Depend on Others 394 29.1% ' Prefer to Drive 388 28.7% Poor Transit Service 388 28.7% ' Need Car for Work 370 27.3% May Need Car for Emergency 333 24.6% ' Hard to Find Rideshare Partners 313 23.1% Need to Drop/Pick up Children 229 16.9% ' Other 135 10.0% While the top two reasons, irregular hours and needing car for personal use, remained ' the same from 1991 to 1992, most of the other reasons changed. Need car for work dropped from third to sixth place, while don't want to depend on others rose from fourth place to third. Perhaps most disturbingly, prefer to drive rose from ninth place ' to being tied for fourth place. People who simply prefer to drive are probably the hardest to convince to rideshare. ' It is interesting that irregular hours always shows up at the top, or second to the top, on lists like this. People usually mean that they are afraid of unexpected overtime, so they drive alone. Most commuters at the Centre arrive and depart work in a narrow band of time; it is not as if everyone there works odd schedules. Perhaps the ' only way to combat the irregular hours excuse is to encourage commuters to try carpooling, or transit, one day a week. Many people find that they can manage to avoid unscheduled overtime once a week. ' The people who say they need their cars for personal use are also of some concern. In future surveys, it would be interesting to find out what the personal use consists ' of. This past year, PacTel began sponsoring a shuttle which runs from Contra Costa Centre to Broadway Plaza from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Presumably, this shuttle should address the need for one's car at lunch. Again, for those people who are ' shopping, etc., after work, there may be a question of changing habits. For instance, ' 11 someone may drive alone every day because he needs the car for grocery shopping one day each week. Commute Alternative Information ' Survey respondents were asked a series ofuestions regarding their awareness of ridesharing incentives and information. Approximately 40%had heard of the ' Guaranteed Ride Home Program for registered carpoolers and vanpoolers. This program was for vanpoolers only until February, 1992, when carpoolers were permitted to join. Among solo drivers, 38% had heard of the program. ' People heard about the program from the following sources: ' Solo Drivers All Commuters Transportation Fair 40.0% 39.4% Bulletin/fliers 23.0% 25.1% Co-worker/TSM coordinator 18.2% 17.3% Newsletter 14.5% 13.7% Other 4.3% 4.6% ' Commuters were also asked if they were aware the CCCA's free commute information and ridematching services. More than half (51.1%) of all commuters were aware of the services, and only 48.2% of solo drivers were. They heard about them the following ways: Solo Drivers All Commuters ' Transportation Fair 49.1% 50.7% Bulletin/fliers 19.1% 21.0% Newsletter 14.3% 12.6% ' Co-worker/TSM coordinator 13.8% 12.5% Other 3.7% 3.3% Last year, most people had heard about the ridematching services via bulletins and fliers. The transportation fair came second, and the newsletter came third. Also, last year, 56% of the respondents were aware of the services, compared to 51% this year. ' Finally, survey respondents were asked if they were interested in further information, or if they just wanted to be entered in the drawing for prizes. Most ' (72.3%) wanted to be entered in the drawing only. Solo Drivers All Commuters ' Drawing only 73.4% 72.3% Carpool/Vanpool information 7.1% 7.1% Guaranteed Ride Home program 7.0% 8.8% Carpool/Vanpool and Guaranteed Ride Home 12.4% 11.8% ' 12 ' Average Vehicle Ridership and Peak Period Goals ' The average vehicle ridership at Contra Costa Centre is 1.19. With AVR, the higher the number, the better. If everyone drove alone, the number would be 1.0, and so on. The County goal for the Centre in 1993 is 1.15, and in 1994, 1.20. So, even if the ' Centre does not improve over the next year, they will have achieved their 1993 goal. Last year, the County Ordinance required the Centre to have at least 25% of their employees using an alternative commute mode during the peak period. The Centre easily achieved this measure. ' This year, the goal increased to 30% of commuters in alternative modes, and, unfortunately, so did the drive-alone rate. The percentage of solo drivers arriving at work between 7:00 and 9:00 AM is 73.1%. To achieve the County goal, the number should be 70%. Ironically, last year, when the goal was 25%, the Centre managed to get 30% of commuters out of their single occupant vehicles. ' The County goal for the evening peak period is the same as in the morning, 30% of commuters using alternative modes. In this case, though, the Centre achieved the goal exactly, with 70.3% of commuters driving alone in the peak period. ' It may seem puzzling that the Centre can meet the AVR goal, but miss the peak period trip reduction goal. There are two reasons for this. First, the goals are not equal. An AVR of 1.15 is not the same as a drive-alone rate of 70%. The other reason is that AVR takes into account telecommuting and compressed work weeks, and the peak period calculation does not. An AVR calculation for the Centre is included in Appendix 2. 1 Conclusions and Recommendations It is very difficult to draw firm conclusions from the 1992 data. All the ridesharin g incentive programs that existed in previous years were running, and in some cases, ' expanding. It would be logical to expect the number of solo drivers to remain stable, or even decrease. ' There are three possible reasons for the drive-alone rate to increase. First, the survey sample size increased. The more precise measurement may simply be yielding a more accurate picture. It may be that if such a large sample size was gathered in ' 1991, the drive-alone rate would have been higher. Second, an extraordinarily high number of people moved their arrival and ' departure times from the peak period. While it helps to ease congestion, it also makes it harder to find ridesharing partners. This dramatic change in work hours occurred in all buildings. We can only speculate, but the change may be attributable to the recession. Companies tend to cut back on hiring people during recessions, and instead encourage current ' 13 ' employees to work more. Current employees are often willing to do so, as they.are ' concerned about their jobs. This may explain the time shift phenomenon. Finally, one large building, Pacific Plaza, experienced a large increase in the drive- alone rate, from 64% to 74.4%. This big increase outweighed all the smaller ' improvements at other buildings. It is harder for buildings with lots of tenants to promote ridesharing, but it is still surprising that so many people became solo drivers, especially when the number of people dropped from 559 to 551,from year to year. We recommend that this building be singled out for special attention throughout ' 1992, if only to reverse the trend, and stabilize the drive-alone rate. Although Pacific Plaza doesn't have the worst drive-alone rate at Contra Costa Centre, if the trend continues it might. The increased percentage of solo drivers can probably be explained by a combination of the above factors, as well as many other reasons. One thing is clear; the drive-alone rate is not due to lack of effort on the part of the COCA. Last year, RIDES recommended that the Centre expand the Guaranteed Ride Home program, and establish a shuttle service. The CCCA did both of these things, with the help of Pactel Corporation. The vanpool program is alive and well, and the carpool program is healthy. ' The one ridesharing alternative which seems underused is transit. There is a BART station virtually in the Centre, yet less than 10% of employees choose this alternative. The primary reason for driving alone is that commuters have irregular hours. BART trains run fairly regularly, so working overtime shouldn't be a problem. ' One way to encourage people to use transit is to offer subsidies. While CCCA is not an employer, and so cannot offer benefits, CCCA could heavily promote the idea. ' Commuter CheckTM is a service in which employers offer their employees $20 vouchers which can be used to purchase most types of transit tickets. These vouchers are tax-free, and so cost the employers only $14 apiece. There are other, ' similar programs which the CCCA could present to employers. It might even be possible to work out a volume discount arrangement with a group of Centre employers. ' Another suggestion is to focus on the new employees. As the Centre grows, each new employee is a potential solo driver. They should be strongly encouraged to ' register for carpooling, not just by the CCCA, but by their employers. Progressively more limited parking will help to discourage solo drivers, but the problem should be actively addressed. ' A final recommendation is that the CCCA keep doing what it is doing, expanding and enhancing incentives to find alternative commute modes. The current drive- alone rate may turn out to be a blessing in disguise, as it will enable the CCCA to draw attention to the situation at the Centre, and keep commuters from getting complacent. ' 14 ' Appendix 1 Home Cities of Survey Participants Contra Costa County Alameda County Santa Clara County ' Concord 292 Oakland 82 San Jose 22 Walnut Creek 245 Pleasanton 57 Santa Clara 6 Pittsburg 96 Berkeley 30 Mountain View 5 Martinez 93 Fremont 28 Sunnyvale 4 Pleasant Hill 90 Alameda 26 Campbell 4 Antioch 90 San Leandro 23 Los Altos 3 San Ramon 57 Hayward 22 Cupertino 2 Danville 39 Emeryville 7 Milpitas 2 Richmond 34 Livermore 7 Los Gatos 1 Benicia 29 Newark 5 Saratoga 1 Lafayette 22 San Lorenzo 3 Total 50 Oakley 21 Union City 1 Clayton 16 Total 291 Alamo 14 San Francisco (County) 120 Moraga 13 Rodeo 11 Orinda 11 Solano County Pinole 5 Vallejo 36 ' Brentwood 4 Fairfield 22 Bethel Island 4 Suisun 15 Byron 1 Vacaville 14 ' E1 Cerrito 1 Total 87 Hercules 1 ' Crockett 1 Total 1,190 ' San Mateo County Other Counties Marin County Daly City 12 Napa 18 San Rafael 12 San Mateo 6 Vernalis 5 Novato 5 ' Pacifica 5 Petaluma 4 Larkspur 3 Palo Alto 5 Stockton 4 Corte Madera 1 Burlingame 4 Citrus Heights 4 Mill Valley 1 S. San Francisco 4 Lower Lake 3 Sausalito 1 Half Moon Bay 2 Modesto 3 Total 23 Millbrae 2 Sacramento 3 Redwood City 2 Cotati 1 San Bruno 2 Santa Rosa 1 San Carlos 2 Woodland 1 Total 46 Davis 1 Total 48 ' APP endix 2 IBAAQMD Draft Guidelines Formula: EN = AVR Where: E = Number of Employees V = Number of Vehicles E = 2,653 Employers do not get credit for vacation and sick leave. Only employees who arrive at work between 6:00 AM and 10:00 AM are counted. At the Centre, 94.0% of the survey respondents (1,747) arrive during the peak period. All the people who did not respond to the survey (794) are assumed to arrive during the peak period. Total employees =1,747+794=2,541 V = [E - (Tel + Com + Alt)] Where: Tel = number of employees telecommuting or 12. ' There are 60 employees who telecommute an average of 4.28 days per month. Multiplying this out, and dividing by 21 (working days in a month) yields an average of 12 people telecommuting each day. Com = employees using compressed work weeks or 10. Nine employees work 9/80, saving 2 days a month, 19 work 4/40, saving 4 I days a month, and 4 work 3/36, saving 8 days a month. Many people work another type of compressed schedule, but they did not explain it. A conservative assumption is that they work one day each month. Adding the ' numbers together and dividing as above yields 10 people out each day for compressed work weeks. ' Alt = employees using alternatives to driving alone or 380. All employees who did not respond (33%) are assumed to drive alone. ' Mode CCC Percent CCC Number Trips Saved (of 1,747) Occupancy Per Person Drive Alone 73.0% 1,275 1 0 ' Carpool 10.4% 182 2.23 0.55 Vanpool 2.3% 40 9.8 0.90 Transit 11.4% 199 30 0.97 Bike/Walk 2.9% 51 no vehicle 1.0 I • carpooling reduces: 100 trips (182 x 0.55) • vanpooling reduces: 36 trips (40 x 0.90) . • transit use reduces: 193 trips (199 x 0.97) • bike/walk reduces: 51 trips (51 x 1.00). ' Total Reduction: 380 trips AVR = 2,541 / [2,541 - (12 + 10 + 380] I AVR = 2,541 / 2,139 AVR= 1.19 i CONTRA' COSTA CENTRE COMMUTE SURVEY . ' JUNE 1992 The Contra Costa Centre would like to request your help with Transportation System Management planning. Please take a few minutes to complete this annual survey. Return it to your Supervisor or Building Coordinator no later than 5 : 00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3, 1992 . Thank you for your help. Be ' sure to include your name for the prize drawing! 1 . Home City Home Zip Code ' 2 . Company Name ( Include Division) 3 . How many miles is your one-way commute? ' 4 . How do you normally get to work? (Check all that apply) ' A. Drive alone F. Bus B. Carpool (total # in car ) G. Dropped off C. Vanpool (total # in van ) H. Bicycle D. BART I . Other ' E. Walk ( 3+ blocks) If you checked more than one method of commuting, please explain: i 5 . Have you changed your normal method of getting to work within the last year? A. No, I am still commuting by the same method B. Yes, I used to commute by _ C. Yes, I have changed commute methods several times this year. iIf yes, why did you change? i6 . What time do you normally . . . . . . start work a.m. /p.m. ' leave work a.m. /p.m. 7 . Does your employer allow you to work a compressed work week ( i .e. more hours per day, fewer days per week) Yes No. ' If yes, what type of schedule do you work? 9/80 4/40 3/36 Other (Specify) 8 . Does your employer offer you the option of Telecommuting ( i .e. telephone and/or computer link from home to office)to work? Yes No If yes, how many days per month do you use the Telecommuting option? Days per month i 1 9 . If you drive alone to work,- what is preventing you from sharing a ride or using transit to get to work? (Check all that apply) A._My hours are too irregular to share a ride. B.—I need my car for work. C. I need my car for personal business . D._Transit service is not adequate. E . Difficult to find others with whom to share a ride. F. Do not like to depend on others . G.—Can not get home in an emergency. H._I have to drop off/pick up my children. I .—I prefer to drive my own car. J. Other: 10 . The Contra Costa Centre offers a Guaranteed Ride Home Program to registered carpool and vanpool members, are you aware of this service? Yes No If yes, how did you find out about the service? ' A._Transportation Faire B. Newsletter ' C. Co-worker or Transportation Coordinator D. Bulletin notices/fliers E.—Other i 11 . The Contra Costa Centre offers free commute information and ride matching services, are you aware of these services? Yes No If yes, how did you find out about the services? A. Transportation Faire B. Newsletter C. Co-worker or Transportation Coordinator D. Bulletin notices/fliers E. Other ---------------------------(Optional) --------------------------------- Complete the section below if you would like to enter the Contra Costa Centre Commute Survey Drawing for one of the $50 . 00 cash prizes ! Each ' building at the Contra Costa Centre will have a winner! You can also obtain information about ridesharing or vanpooling by completing this form. The information is free and is provided courtesy of RiDES for ' Bay Area Commuters, Inc. First Name Last Name Home street address iHome phone ( ) Work phone ( ) Check all that apply: i Enter me in the drawing for a $50. 00 cash prize I would like more information about a carpool I would like more information about a vanpool ' I would like more information about the Guaranteed Ride Home Program i