Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09081992 - 1.147 1 4 7 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ' T0: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DATE: September 8, 1992 FROM: Richard J. Martinez, Acting Interim Executive Director AGREEMENT FOR VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE WITH SUBJECT: TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE the proposed Voluntary Compliance Agreement with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 between the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and AUTHORIZE execution by the Chair or the Board of Commissioners and the Acting Interim Executive Director of the Housing Authority, as recommended by the Advisory Housing Commission. II . FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: In March of 1987 the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducted a Title VI on-site review at the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa. The review covered the following areas: Admission and Continued Occupancy Policies; Tenant Selection and Assignment; and, Maintenance and the Delivery of Services and Facilities by the Housing Authority. At the end of the on-site review an exit conference was, held with the HUD staff. During this conference the Housing Authority was advised of HUD's preliminary findings. Specifically, the Housing Authority was advised that it would need to go to a centralized waiting list and tenant assignment plan. At that time the Housing Authority was taking applications at each development rather than on a community wide basis. The HUD staff advised the Housing Authority that it would be receiving a formal "Letter of Findings" which would specify that the Housing Authority implement a community wide tenant selection and assignment plan and revise its Admission and Occupancy Policy to reflect these changes. Upon completion of the site review and exit conference, the Housing Authority proceeded to implement the actions suggested by HUD staff, including the creation of a single community wide waiting list. All of HUD's suggested actions were implemented by July, 1988. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENTS YES SIGNATUItEs RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION Oj 130ARD CO MITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON eptem er 8, 1992_ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS x --- UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS A TRUE AND AYES: NOES: CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: ATTESTED September 8, 1992 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Commissioners M362/1-03 BY �4wae�_. DEPUTY 11Y7 Board of Commissioners September 8, 1992 Page 2 On March 27, 1992 the Housing Authority received the official results from HUD of the on-site review they had conducted in March of 1987. The Housing Authority responded to the HUD findings and met with HUD staff to go over the response. HUD staff advised the Housing Authority that its voluntary efforts successfully addressed all of the concerns identified during the review, and that execution of the proposed "Voluntary Compliance Agreement" between HUD and the dousing Authority was all that remained to be done. At its Regular Meeting on August 17, 1992, the Advisory Housing Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed Voluntary Compliance Agreement and execution by the Chair of the Board of Commissioners and the:Acting Interim Executive Director of the Housing Authority. IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Should the Board of Commissioners elect to not approve the execution of the Voluntary Compliance Agreement the HUD findings from the March 1987 on-site Title VI review of Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa would not be cleared from the record.