HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02111992 - 1.56 r 5
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on February 11 , 1992 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson, McPeak
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Determination. of Property Tax)
Transfer for 91-12 Annexation) RESOLUTION NO. 92/ 84
to Oakley Water District )
(LAFC 91-35) )
WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that a
jurisdictional change resulting from a special district providing one or more
services to an area where such services have not been provided previously shall not
become effective if one or more affected special. districts involved in the property
tax exchange negotiation fails to adopt.a resolution agreeing to a transfer; and
WHEREAS, the. Board of Supervisors shall determine the property tax exchange for
each affected district that fails. to adopt a resolution agr--eeinq to a property tax
transfer for the annexing district; and
WHEREAS, the Oakley Water District is the only affected agency in the 91-12
Annexation and the District has requested that no property tax be exchanged as a
result of the annexation..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY HEREBY DETERMINES that no property tax will be transferred. to the Oakley Water.
District as a result of annexing the -territory described in the 91-12. Annexation to
Oakley Water. District. This resolution does not change. the property tax revenue
accruing to other agencies serving the subject territory or the affected. districts'
right to collect taxes for existing bonded indebtedness-. The property tax exchange
agreement discussed above shall. apply to affected territory as submitted or revised
by the Local. Agency Formation Commission.
I hereby certify that this is a true and
correct copy of an action taken and entered
on the minutes of the Board of. Supervisors on
the date shown.
February 11 , 1992
ATTESTED:
Phil Batchelor, Clerk. of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator
By v ' Deputy
cc: Auditor-Controller
County Administrator
County Counsel
LAFCO
Oakley Water District
RESOLUTION NO. 92/ 84