HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12081992 - TC.3 ell.
Contra
� Costa
unty
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORSc
FROM: TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
DATE: November 30, 1992
SUBJECT: Report on use of Navy Mitigation Funds for support services to the
Greater East Bay Rail Opportunities Coalition
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Authorize an increase in Navy Mitigation Funds from the current
expenditure limit of $23 , 000 to a revised limit of $32 , 000 for use
by the Director of Community Development to amend a Consultant
Services Agreement with William R. Gray & Company for support
services to the Greater East Bay Rail Opportunities Coalition.
FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no impact to the County General Fund. The Navy
Mitigation Money Expenditure Plan allocates $250, 000 to rail
studies. The amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement will
be funded from this allocation.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On June 16, 1992, the ,Board of Supervisors authorized an amount not
to exceed $23 , 000 in Navy Mitigation Funds for use by the Director
of Community Development for a sole-source Consultant Services
Agreement with William R. Gray & Company to provide support
services to the County' s Greater East Bay Rail Opportunities
Coalition.
The last invoice submitted by contractor exceeded the agreement
limit by $9, 000. This invoice involved preparation of a draft
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
RPPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE (S) : Schroder Tom Torlakson
ACTION OF BOARD ON 99oL APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED �_ OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
U'VANIMOUS (ABSENT IL TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES:_ ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: S.Goetz, CDD, 646-2131
Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED
cc: Public Works Department.:.'. PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY , DEPUTY
ti
Navy Mitigation Funds for GEBROC Support Services
November 30, 1992
Page Two
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) requested by members of the Coalition.
The draft JEPA has been forwarded by the Coalition to member jurisdictions for
their consideration.
Although the County is not obligated to pay any invoice beyond the $23 , 000
authorization limit, Community Development Department staff indicates the draft
JEPA is needed by the Coalition and recommends payment of the full invoiced
amount. Staff has directed the consultant to cease any further work pursuant to
the agreement. Any further work for GEBROC support services would require a
separate Consulting Service Agreement.
The Board' s adopted expenditure plan for the Navy Mitigation Funds allocated
$250, 000 for "rail studies. " Approximately $30, 000 of this allocation has been
used for the Contra Costa Rail Opportunities Study. The current authorization
limit for the Consulting Services Agreement with William R. Gray & Company is for
$23 , 000. By increasing this authorization limit to $32 , 000, the remaining
uncommitted balance in Navy Mitigation Funds for rail studies will be $195, 000.
The Navy Mitigation Fund Expenditure Plan requires any funding recommendation be
forwarded by the Community Development Department, through the Transportation
Committee, to the Board of Supervisors. The Transportation Committee concurs with
staff' s recommendation considering the value of the service provided. However,
the Transportation Committee expressed considerable concern regarding the
potential precedence that might be established by reimbursing the consultant for
work beyond the contract's specified limit, and for not be notified by the
consultant that the the spending limit has been reached before additional charges
where made. The Transportation Committee has requested County staff to remind the
consultant, in writing, of the contract provisions that limit the County's
financial commitment to the amount specified in the contract, and that any work
beyond that amount must be authorized beforehand through a contract amendment.