HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12081992 - TC.1 Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
;z Costa
FROM: Transportation Committee
.o
M.. County
DATE: November 30, 1992
SUBJECT: Annual Report on the County TDM Employee Program
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS (S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Accept the 1992 County TDM Employee Survey Report (see Exhibit
A) ; and
2 . Approve work program for Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
activities for 1993 (see Exhibit B) ;
FISCAL IMPACTS
The Community Development Department budgeted $25, 000 for TDM Program
Administration and costs for the employee survey ($4500) and printing
the brochure of available TDM services ($2500) . The other costs
specified herein, as the Employee Incentive Program ($15, 000) , will
require separate authorization by the Board of Supervisors.
Departments providing existing personnel for the Building Coordinator
Program will use their existing departmental budgets to fund this
responsibility.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COU Y NISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE HER
/OM /
SIGNATURE(S) : R e der Tom Torlakson
ACTION OF BOARD46N
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: Community Development
CAO ATTESTED , /1Pp-,
CDD PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
GMEDA THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Personnel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY l , DEPUTY
r
BACKGROUND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Since 1986, the Board of Supervisors has taken a number of actions
under the general heading of Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
with the goals of reducing peak hour traffic congestion, energy
consumption, noise levels and emissions. These actions include the
enactment of TDM ordinances applying to employers and residential
developments in the unincorporated area and for the Pleasant Hill
BART Station Area; approval of a pilot programs allowing County
employees to work compressed/flexible hours and telecommute;
authorization of use of County vehicles for County employee
carpools and vanpools; and designation of the Pine Street-Escobar
Street parking lot for employee carpools.
More recently, December 9, 1991, this Board approved the TDM Work
Program for 1992 , identifying a number of tasks for the Community
Development Department to perform.
The 1992 TDM County Employee Survey Report (Exhibit A) for the
Board's review and acceptance is a product of one of those
identified tasks.
TDM Work Program for 1993 ( Exhibit B) continues some of those
previous efforts from 1992 and identifies additional tasks as well.
1992 COUNTY TDM EMPLOYEE SURVEY REPORT
The Community Development Department recently surveyed county
employees to determine work locations and commute patterns, so that
an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) could be calculated for sites
with 100 or more employees. The Community Development Department
forwarded the survey data for analysis to RIDES for the Bay Area
Commuters. Their analysis report indicates that county employees
working in the Civic Center have an AVR of 1. 15 -- well within
BAAQMD's proposed 1993 AVR standard of 1. 10 for the area. However,
11 of 14 employee work sites elsewhere in the county would fall
short of the 1993 standards for the County.
And regardless of work site, the overall AVR is 1. 13 for all county
employees working in the county.
Comparing with 1990 survey results, in retrospect, the County has
made some positive gains in 1992 : 1) lowering the drive alone rate
to work from 90. 4% to 86. 6; 2) increasing car/van pooling from 5.7%
to 7 .9%, with nominal gains in other commute modes as well; 3)
increasing to 40% of employees that work compressed work weeks and
flex-time schedules; and 4) increasing significantly the employee
survey response rate from 29% to 53% . These statistics suggest
that the County has established an effective TDM program from 1990
to 1992 .
The results, moreover, revealed that a number of work sites with
100 or more employees and low AVRs also had low response rates,
ranging from 16. 68% - 65. 83%. The BAAQMD' s proposed guidelines
stipulate that work sites with response rates under 60% that the
BAAQMD will assume the remainder will drive alone to work; if the
sites' response rates are 60% or better, the BAAQMD will assume
that half of the non-respondents drive alone and the other half
have the same AVR as the responding employees, thereby improving
the site AVR.
Future gains in elevating the AVR further hinge on the County's
wider use of telecommuting, compressed work week, and flex-time
schedule, since these are effective and easily implementable TDM
approaches according to RIDE's analysis.
Continuing efforts in assisting employees to car/van pool, as well
as joint marketing with Transit Providers to provide transit
services to the Civic Centre and other areas, will also lend to
improved AVRs.
r
TDM WORK PROGRAM FOR 1992-93
The Transportation Planning Division has identified specific
actions for the County's TDM Program for the 1993 (Exhibit B) .
These actions include: maintenance of the of County employee and
facilities data base; a survey of County employees in conformance
with the BAAQMD requirements to ascertain Average Vehicle Ridership
(AVR) of County employment sites, housing 100 or more County
employees; an information dissemination program including
designation of County Building Coordinators, personnel to inform
and assist County employees on options for commute alternatives and
for air quality improvement during Spare the Air Days; orientation
of new employees; development of a guaranteed ride home program;
availability of compressed work week and flexible work schedules
for all County personnel; provision of bicycle parking facilities
and showers; employee incentives; preferred parking for carpoolers;
administration of the County carpool and vanpool programs; and
administration of the Pilot Telecommuting Program.
A challenging aspect of the 1993 TDM Work Program is the Building
Coordinator Program. The development of this program will involve
individual departments, housed in the same building, to cooperate
among and between each other in designating a Building Coordinator.
Once the departments have accomplished this essential task, an
endeavor yet awaits: cooperating with the Building Coordinator on
matters concerning car/van pool and Spare the Air activities.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: 1992 TDM County Employee Survey Report
Exhibit B: 1993 TDM Work Program
EXHIBIT A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY
NOVEMBER 1992
Prepared by:
rU
Maria Thayer
RIDES Planning and Research
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary....................................................................................................1
Methodology.................................................................................................................2
ResponseRate...............................................................................................................2
Major Work Sites: AVR and BAAQMD Requirements.....................................3
Work Hours and Schedule........................................................................................4
Current Commute: Mode, Distance and Travel Time........................................6
Interest in Commute Alternatives..........................................................................6
Comparison with 1990 Survey..................................................................................7
OverallCounty AVR..................................................................................................9
Summary.......................................................................................................................10
Appendix.......................................................................................................................i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Completed transportation surveys were received from 4,395 employees, or
53% of the County's work force, in May 1992. The last survey, in 1990, elicited
responses from 2,323 employees, or 29% of the work force.
• The percentage of Contra Costa County employees who drive alone to work
decreased from 90.4% in 1990 to 86.6% in 1992.
• Between 1990 and 1992, carpoolers increased from 5.7% of County employees
to 7.4%, BART riders increased from .2% to .8%, bicycle riders from .2% to
.6%, motorcycle riders from .1% to .5% and the percentage of employees
walking to work increased from 1.1% to 1.8%.
• Forty per cent (40%) of the County's employees work some form of
compressed work schedule, compared with 60% who work a conventional
five day a week schedule.
• The increase in the use of commute alternatives among County employees
raised the overall Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) for the County from 1.05
to 1.08 between 1990 and 1992. Factoring in the effects of compressed work
weeks increases the overall AVR to 1.13.
• Based on responses to the 1990 survey, the biggest obstacle to the use of
commute alternatives among County employees is the need for a vehicle for
personal business, either at lunch or after work. Irregular work hours, the
need for a vehicle for work, the lack of carpool partners and inadequate
transit are other major problems for employees.
• Compensating time off and cash rewards are the two most popular incentives
for the use of commute alternatives among County employees. Employees
are also interested in subsidized transit fares.
• In 1992 the County surveyed by building and department for the first time.
Among buildings outside of downtown Martinez with more than 100
employees, the response rate varied from 17% to 72%. The response rate
among employees working in downtown Martinez was 65%.
• Employees at the Civic Center in Martinez have an AVR of 1.15, which is
well within Bay Area Air Quality District's proposed 1993 standards; but of
the remaining 14 sites with 100 or more employees, eleven sites, or 78.5%,
would fall short of the 1993 standards for Contra Costa county.
• Employee disinterest in ridesharing (79% are not interested in car or
vanpooling and 82% are unwilling to adjust work hours for ridesharing)
indicates that it would be most effective to focus the County's efforts to
improve AVR on improved response rates, telecommuting, compressed
work weeks and flex-time.
1
Contra Costa County Employee Transportation Survey
Contra Costa County administered a transportation survey to its 8,300 employees in
May, 1992. Answers provided on the surveys were combined with the County's
records to develop a profile of the transportation-related characteristics of its
employees. The results of the study will be used to develop a commute alternatives
program for County employees.
Methodology
The survey was distributed and returned to all employees through their
departments. Employees were asked to provide their employee number (so their
responses could be matched with data from the County's personnel records),
building number and information about their work schedule, their commute to
work on the day they completed the survey, their interest in commute alternatives
and whether or not they had a computer at home. Responses to the survey could be
used to estimate whether the County meets the performance objectives included in
the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) proposed Trip
Reduction Rule.
The BAAQMD's proposed rule will require employers of more than one hundred
employees at a single work site to conduct annual employee transportation surveys
to measure the site's AVR (Average Vehicle Ridership) or VER (Vehicle Employee
Ratio). AVR, in its simplest form, is the number of employees who start work at a
work site during the peak period divided by the number of vehicles those
employees use to arrive at the work site. VER is the number of vehicles used by
employees who start work during the peak period divided by the number of those
employees. Each employer may choose the performance measure which it prefers to
track progress toward the performance objectives in the rule; AVR is used in this
report.
The County's 1992 employee transportation survey cannot be used to comply with
the proposed rule. Employers will be required to use questions provided by
BAAQMD to measure AVR or VER and to administer surveys during a "survey
week" that does not include a holiday or ridesharing promotion. However the 1992
survey does provide a preview of what the AVR or VER at affected sites is likely to
be when the BAAQMD survey is administered.
Response Rate
4,395 surveys were returned by County employees, which is 53% of the 8,257
employees included in the County's data file. However, only 3,971 of the completed
surveys included employee numbers that could be matched with County data to
complete the respondents' record. These 3,971 responses represent 48% of the
County's employees.
2
The number of responses received in 1992 represent a 71% increase over the 2,323
responses received to a transportation survey in 1990. Further, the increase in
response rate, from 29% to 53%, was an impressive 83%. Achieving a high response
rate will be crucial to meeting the BAAQMD's performance objectives; the increase
in response rate between 1990 and 1992 is evidence that the County is establishing an
effective TDM program.
Among departments with more than one hundred employees, the response rate
varied between 22.5% of the Medical Services Employees of the Health Services
Department and 93.7% of the Assessor's Department. The rate of response also
varied by building and employee city of residence. This report assumes that survey
results are representative of the employee population as a whole.
The Appendix includes tables of the response rate to the survey by department
number, building (as provided by County records) and employee city of residence as
well as a copy of the survey with percentage response to all questions.
MaJor Work Sites: AVR and BAAQMD Requirements
The County of Contra Costa has fourteen buildings outside of downtown Martinez
with more than one hundred employees. Buildings 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 20, 23,
24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 33, 266, 282 and 461 in downtown Martinez can be considered
one site for the purposes of the trip reduction rule. Buildings outside the Civic
Center area with fewer than 100 employees are not affected by the BAAQMD's
proposed rule. The performance objective for the urbanized areas of Contra Costa
County in 1993 will be an AVR of 1.10 persons per vehicle, increasing incrementally
to 1.40 in 1999. All of the County's buildings and sites with more than 100
employees are located in the urbanized areas of Contra Costa County.
Using the methodology included in the BAAQMD's August 21, 1992 Notice of
Proposed Rule, including procedures for dealing with survey non-respondents, the
current AVR at the applicable County locations ranges from 1.01 to 1.25 (Table 1).
Referring to Table 1, "Respondent AVR" is the AVR which results when only
respondents to the survey are considered; "Site AVR" is the AVR when non-
respondent are included in the calculation. No minimum responses rate is set in
the proposed rule; if fewer than 60% of a site's employee's respond to the survey,
then all of those employees who do not respond will be assumed to drive alone to
work. If the site's response rate is 60% or better, the BAAQMD will adjust the AVR
by assuming that half of the non-respondent's drive alone and the other half have
the same AVR as the employees who. completed the survey.
3
Table 1
AVR: Contra Costa County Buildings w/100+ Employees and Downtown Martinez
Building # Address Response Respondent Site AVR
Rate A V R
15 40 Muir Rd. MTZ 70.71% 1 .16 1 .13
34 30 Muir Rd. MTZ 54.15% 1 .12 1.06
38 255 Glacier Dr MTZ 72.22% 1 .31 1.25
44 202 Glacier Dr. MTZ 25.71% 1 .05 1 .01
57 100 37th St. RIC 49.53% 1 .07 1.03
58 100 38th St. RIC 44.51% 1 .07 1 .03
130 1980 Muir Rd. MTZ 36.13% 1 .13 1.04
201 2500 Alhambra Av. MTZ 16.68% 1 .13 1 .02
227 1305 Macdonald Av RIC 47.11% 1 .26 1 .11
245 4545 Delta Fair Bl. ANT 50.79% 1 .13 1.06
273 40 Douglas Dr MTZ 57.69% 1 .16 1.08
277 595 Center Av MTZ 53.42% 1 .09 1 .05
333 550 School St PIT 65.83% 1 .03 1 .03
390 5555 Giant Hwy RIC 33.54% 1 .08 1.02
Downtown Martinez 64.99% 1 .19 1 .15
All large employers in the BAAQMD will have to meet certain administrative
requirements, including notification of employees, the appointment of an Employee
Transportation Coordinator (ETC), identifying a responsible Employer Program
Manager, registration with the BAAQMD, conducting employee surveys and
developing and implementing an Employer Trip Reduction Program. Only sites
that do not meet the BAAQMD's performance objectives will be required to submit
an Employer Trip Reduction Plan to the BAAQMD or local jurisdiction for review
and approval.
Work Hours and Schedule
About 60% of the respondents to the survey indicated that they work one of the
thirteen daytime schedules listed on the survey form (See Appendix 1). The others
wrote in their actual hours; of these respondents, 42% start work before 7:00 A.M. or
after 9:30 A.M. and 43% leave work before 4:30 P.M. or after 7:30 P.M. Chart 1
illustrates percentage of respondents arriving during the morning peak hour in 1990
and 1992.
4
CHART 1
Start Work Times: 1990 and 1992
50%--
40%--
30%--
20%--
10%-
0%
0%40%/%30%/o20%10%/o0%
before 7:30- 8:01 - after shift
7:30 8:00 8:30 8:30 work;
varied
hours
0 1990 survey ❑ 1992 survey
About 40% of the survey respondents work some sort of compressed work week. A
"9/80" schedule, where the employee has one day off every two weeks, is the most
common arrangement. Chart 2 illustrates the distribution of the 40% by type of
compressed schedule: on a 9/80 schedule employees work nine hour days with one
day off every two weeks and on a 4/40 schedule employees work four ten hour days
with one day off every week.
CHART 2
Type of Schedule of Compressed Week Employees
70% --
60%.-
50% .-
40%
0%/%s0%ios0%o40%
30%
20% .-
10%.-
0%
0%/010%/00%
"9/80" "4/40" other
Many County employees are able to adjust their work hours; 39.5% reported that
their departments allow schedule adjustment. This reflects the County Board of
5
Supervisor's authorization of compressed and flexible work hours for all
departments. Adjustable hours can be a mixed blessing for a commute alternatives
program. On one hand, adjustable hours can allow employees to use fixed transit
schedules or adapt to co-workers' schedules for carpooling and vanpooling.
However "flexible" hours often mean "unpredictable" hours, one of the most
commonly cited obstacles to ridesharing.
Current Commute: Mode, Distance and Travel Time
Driving alone is by far the most common way for County employees to get to work;
86.6% drove alone on the day they completed the survey. Carpooling is the most
popular commute alternative—a total of 7.4% reported that they arrived in a
carpool--5.7% with one other person, 1.2% with two others and .5% with three
others. Very few people (2.4% of the total) walked or rode a bicycle to work, and
even fewer (.8%) used transit.
Drive alone rates varied among the County's work sites. Only 52% of the
respondents working in building 802, 2730 Maine Avenue in Richmond, drove
alone to work; 12% walked to work. In contrast, 19 buildings with more than 10
employees had drive alone rates of 100%. Buildings in downtown Martinez have a
combined drive alone rate of 82.1%. Buildings with low drive alone rates are
typically in more densely populated locations with public transit nearby.
County employees travel an average 16.3 miles one way to work; average travel
time is 23.7 minutes. Building 802, with the lowest drive alone rate, has an average
one-way distance of 8 miles and an average travel time of 17.7 minutes.
Interest in Commute Alternatives
About a quarter of the County's employees have some interest in or demonstrate
some willingness to rideshare. Just over a thousand (1036) or 26% of the
respondents answered "yes" to at least one of the questions: "Are you interested in
car or vanpooling?", "Are you willing to change your work schedule in order to
carpool?" or "Are you interested in receiving a car/vanpool matchlist from (RIDES
for) Bay Area Commuters and registering with them?".
Of the 576 respondents who requested matchlists from RIDES, three-quarters were
interested in carpooling and half in vanpooling (multiple answers were allowed).
Telecommuting also has potential among County employees; 27.3% of the
respondents have an IBM compatible computer at home. Even if only half of these
employees have jobs suitable for telecommuting, County support for such a
program could eliminate many vehicle trips among PC owners. In addition,
because a computer is not a prerequisite for telecommuting, it is likely that
telecommuting could have very significant effect on the AVR at the County's large
employment sites.
6
Comparison with 1990 Survey
The County administered a transportation survey to employees in April 1990 which
included some of the same questions asked in the 1992 survey. Responses were
received from 2,323, or 29% of the employees to which it was distributed.
The length of employees' one way commute trips stayed about the same between
1990 and 1992 (Table 2 and Chart 3).
Table 2
One Wa Commute Distance: 1990-1992
1990 1992
5 miles or less 27.5% 26.8%
6-10 miles 21.7% 20.1%
11-20 miles 26.9% 29.1%
21-30 miles 15.1% 14.4%
31 miles or more 8.7% 1 9.6%
CHART 3
Commute Distance: 1990-1992
30.00%--
25.00%--
20.00%--
15.00%--
10.00%.-
5.00%
0.00%25.00%/020.00%15.00%10.00%/05.00%
0.00%
5 6-10 11 - 21 - 31
miles miles 20 30 miles
or miles miles or
less more
1990 ❑ 1992
The 1992 survey found an decrease in the drive alone rate among employees from
90.4% in 1990 to 86.6% in 1992, mostly due to an increase in carpooling (Table 3 and
Chart 4)). The general improvement may indicate a more positive attitude toward
commute alternatives and the effectiveness of the County's TDM programs.
7
Table 3
Commute Mode (1990-1992)
1990 1992
Drive Alone 90.4% 86.6%
Carpool 5.7% 7.4%
Vanpool 0.1% 0.1%
Bus 0.6% 0.6%
BART 0.2% 0.8%
Bicycle 0.2% 0.6%
Motorcycle 0.1% 0.5%
Walk 1.1% 1.8%
Other 1.6% 1.6%
CHART 4
Usual Commute Mode 1990-1992
100% 90%87%
80%
60%
40%
20% 6% 8% 1% 1 %
0 0 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2%
0%
C ` m `
•� 2 m Q co Y_ ~O T L_
D Q V : m m a O
� 1990 EL992J
The 1990 survey included questions about the incentives and disincentives to
sharing a ride. This information is still pertinent to those who have the
responsibility for designing the employee transportation program. As shown in
Tables 4 and 5, transit subsidies and compensatory time off would be most likely to
encourage employees to use commute alternatives, while personal business after
work is the biggest obstacle.
8
Table 4
Incentives for Using Commute Alternatives (1990 Survey)
% of respondents choosing incentive
Reduced available parking 4.7%
Required parking fee for driving 6.5%
alone
Preferential parking for car/vanpools 6.4%
Quick ridematching information 10.4%
Chance at prizes 10.0%
Chance at free dinners 6.6%
Compensating time off 29.6%
Full or partial reimbursement of 15.3%
transit fare
Cash incentive pay for carpooling, 27.4%
etc.
Purchase of transit tickets at work site 3.4%
Table 5
Obstacles to the Use of Commute Alternatives (1990 Survey)
% of respondents choosing incentive
My hours are too irregular 21.4%
Difficult to find others to ride with 21.2%
Need my vehicle for work 21.8%
Need my vehicle for personal business 21.3%
during lunch
Need my vehicle for personal business after 29.4%
work
Drop off/pick up my children 13.5%
Prefer to drive myself 16.4%
Lack of direct or frequent bus service 17.6%
Bus takes too long 11.6%
Need to get home in case of emergency 12.0%
No safe bicycle route 3.4%
No secure bicycle storage 1.2%
No safe walking route 1.6%
Other 10.7%
Overall County AVR
Using the total responses to the 1990 and 1992 surveys it is possible to calculate an
overall County AVR for all of the County's employees, regardless of work site or
response rate. These figures can be used to get an idea of the effectiveness of the
County's TDM program.
Data from the 1992 survey reveals an overall AVR of 1.08, before credits for
compressed work week schedule are included. This compares with an AVR of 1.05
from the 1990 survey, which did not collect information about compressed
9
schedules. The increase in AVR is the result of the declining drive alone rate
between the two years. When compressed work weeks are included in the 1992
calculations, the overall AVR is 1.13, illustrating how effective compressed
schedules are in increasing AVR.
The overall AVR contrasts with the individual site AVRs for the County's fourteen
large sites in that no penalty for non-responses are taken. The BAAQMD will
require such a penalty when the trip reduction rule is adopted; it will also require
the use of specific survey questions and that employees-be surveyed for an entire
week's behavior. These stipulations will probably result in lower AVRs than the
overall county AVR.
Summary
The 1992 survey results suggest that the County has made some gains in the use of
commute alternatives among employees since 1990. In addition, the very
significant increase in the response rate is evidence that the County is taking its
responsibilities seriously and is implementing effective procedures to document its
efforts. However, the adoption of the BAAQMD's Employer Rule will require
continued effort, focusing on reducing the AVR at the fourteen employment sites
with one hundred or more employees.
The present overall drive alone rate of 86.6% among Contra Costa County
employees is at the high end of the range of other Bay Area employers) . The drive
alone rate, and the low AVRs at some of the County's larger sites are at least partly
due to the lack of transit in most parts of the County and the general unwillingness
to use alternative commute modes. Recommended approaches to increasing AVRs
at County work locations include improving survey distribution and collection
methods, such as developing a TDM Building Coordinating Program to increase the
response rate. Emphasizing 9/80 and 4/40 compressed work weeks, flexible
schedules and telecommuting are also simple and effective ways to improve AVRs,
in light of the low employee interest in commute alternatives. Utilizing these
recommendations will eliminate vehicle trips, thereby increasing AVRs, decreasing
drive alone rates and improving the air quality in the Bay Area.
IRIDES' study of employment sites in 1990-91 found drive alone rates between 59% (at the Chevron Research
an Technology Company in Richmond) and 93% (at the City of Petaluma).
10
APPENDIX
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
EMPLOYEE SURVEY
1. EMPLOYEE# 3971 employees provided employee numbers that matched numbers in the County
records.
2. BUILDING# (Payroll Clerk Please Provide # from list)
3. WHAT ARE YOUR WORK HOURS? (Check one-please round off to nearest 1/2 hour)
1. 6.7% 7:004:30 6. 4.0%v 8:00-5:30 11. _0.2% 9:00-7:00
2. 2.2% 7:00-5:00 7. 1.2% 8:00-6:00 12. 0.0% 9:30-7:00
3. 16.1% 7:30-5:00 8. 1.7% 8:30-6:00 13. 0.1% 9:30-7:30
4. 2.4% 7:30-5:30 9. 0.2% 8:30-6:30 14. 39.21 Other please
5. 25.0% 8:00-5:00 10. 1.0% 9:00-6:30 specify
4. DO YOU NORMALLY WORK A COMPRESSED WORK WEEK? (Check one)
1. 27.8% Yes,9/80 3. 7.2% Yes, other
2. 5.5% Yes,4/40 4. 59.5% No
5. DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT ALLOW YOU TO ADJUST YOUR WORK HOURS? (Use
Flexible Work Schedules)
1.39.5% Yes 2.60.5% No
6. ARE YOU WILLING TO CHANGE YOUR SCHEDULE IN ORDER TO CARPOOL? (Check
one)
1.18.5% Yes 2. 81.5% No
7. HOW DID YOU GET TO WORK TODAY?
1. 86.6% Drive Alone 5. 1.8% Walk 9. '0.1% Vanpool
2. 5.7% 2 Person Carpool 6. 0.8% BART/Bus 10. 0.5% Motorcycle
3. 1.2% 3 Person Carpool 7. 0.6% Bus 11. 1.6% Other; please
4. 0.5% 4 Person Carpool 8. 0.6% Bicycle specify
8. HOW LONG DID IT TAKE YOU TO COMMUTE ONE-WAY TO WORK TODAY?
Mean=23.7 minutes
9. HOW MAY MILES IS YOUR ONE-WAY COMMUTE? Mean=16.3 miles
10. ARE YOU INTERESTED IN CAR OR VAN POOLING?
1.20.7% Yes 2. 79.3% No
11. DO YOU HAVE A COMPUTER AT HOME (I.B.M. COMPATIBLE CLONE P.C.)
1.27.3% Yes 2. 72.7% No
12. ARE YOU INTERESTED IN RECEIVING A CAR/VAN POOL MATCHLIST FROM BAY
AREA COMMUTERS?
1.14.6% Yes 2. 85.4% No
13. IF YES TO QUESTION 12, ARE YOU INTERESTED IN (check as many as apply)
1. 72.8% Car pooling 3. 68.8% as a passenger
2. 50.9% Van pooling 4. 34.5% providing a vehicle to share
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY
Number of Employees by Department
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0001 - 13 0002 - 5 0003 - 40 0010 - 75 0015 - 30
0016 - 134 0020 - 9 0026 - 21 0030 24 0035 - 32
0036 - 1 0043 - 23 0060 - 24 0063 - 22 0079 - 137
0147 - 84 0148 - 21 0149 - 9 0200 - 50 0220 - 143
0240 - 67 0242 - 115 0243 - 33 0244 - 1 0245 - 101
0253 - 1 0255 - 238 0300 - 115 0301 - 28 0308 - 168
0335 - 19 0341 - 38 0347 - 2 • 0353 - 7 0355 - 16
0357 - 50 0359 - 4 0362 - 7 0364 - 2 0366 - 62
0450 - 187 0452 - 22 0460 - 10 0464 - 27 0466 - 27
0467 - 85 0500 - 527 0540 - 324 0579 - 5 0583 - 11
0588 - 91 0591 - 4 0620 - 120 0630 - 3 0650 - 141
0841 - 7 0860 - 20 4980 - 14 7021 - 14 7034 - 3
7037 - 6 7050 - 28 7080 - 36 7100 - 177 7200 - 87
7260 - 21
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY
Number of Employees by Building
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 - 222 2 - 44 4 - 108 5 - 171 6 - 30
7 - 16 8 - 20 9 - 98 10 - 64 11 - 3
12 - 5 13 - 15 14 - 9 15 - 99 17 - 2
20 - 11 23 - 1 24 - 5 25 - 34 26 - 19
27 - 1 28 - 17 29 - 30 30 - 21 31 - 3
32 - 2 33 - 1 34 - 111 35 - 9 38 - 117
40 - 1 41 - 15 42 - 9 44 - 45 48 - 40
49 - 22 53 - 30 55 - 7 56 - 42 57 - 53
58 - 77 72 - 3 75 - 27 80 - 9 82 - 13
99 - 45 102 - 49 103 - 3 104 - 22 105 - 24
107 - 14 117 - 22 124 - 7 129 - 14 130 - 43
134 - 2 136 - 4 140 - 28 143 - 27 147 - 39
150 - 30 154 - 2 159 - 23 164 - 1 168 - 3
173 - 37 201 - 190 227 - 57 245 - 128 246 - 1
247 - , 249 - 7 259 - 3 266 - 3 269 - 2
270 - 7 271 - 4 272 - 43 273 - 60 274 - 81
275 - 44 276 - 2 277 - 117 278 - 4 279 - 1
280 - 25 282 - 14 283 - 11 285 - 2 287 - 1
292 - 6 300 - 1 301 - 12 302 - 4 310 - 9
320 - 11 323 - 36 327 - 1 330 - 6 332 - 1
333 - 79 335 - 6 338 - 7 345 - 1 350 - 18
352 - 8 353 - 7 354 - 35 359 - 41 368 - 3
372 - 5 375 - 5 390 - 55 451 - 3 454 - 5
455 - 1 456 - 5 457 - 5 458 - 3 459 - 2
460 - 5 461 - 4 462 - 5 463 - 2 464 - 1
465 - 3 466 - 2 468 - 4 469 - 6 470 - 4
471 - 1 600 - 1 800 - 12 801 - 23 802 - 25
803 - 7 844 - 7 851 - 14 852 - 11 853 - 10
854 - 9 855 - 22 856 - 10 857 - 5 858 - 7
859 - 30 863 - 36 864 - 2 866 - 12 867 - 4
868 - 8 875 - 27 876 - 11 877 - 11 878 - 10
879 - 2 880 - 6 881 - 9 882 - 17 883 - 8
884 - 9 885 - 10 886 - 17 887 - 4 888 - 2
889 - 6 890 - 3 891 - 9 892 - 11 893 - 4
894 - 1 895 - 5 896 - 1 898 - 9 899 - 2
901 - 3 902 - 8 903 - 10
. '
07/01/92 /
BLDG ADDRESS CITYCODE CITYNAME
00001 651 PINE ST (ADMIN) MTZ Martinez ---
00002 611 PINE ST (N/W) MTZ Martinez
00003 650 PINE ST (JAIL) MTZ Martinez
00004 625 GOURT ST (FINANCE) MTZ Martinez
00005 725 COURT ST (COURTHSE) MTZ Martinez
00006 1111 WARD ST (HEALTH) MTZ Martinez
00007 1130/1122 ESCOBAR ST MTZ Martinez ^'
00008 1215 MAIN ST (POOL GAR) MTZ Martinez ' '
00009 834 COURT 8T MTZ Martinez -
00(}10 1000 WARD ST (MDF) MTZ Martinez
00010 1000 WARD ST (MDF) MTZ Martinez
00011 1010 WARD ST (COURTS) MTZ Martinez
00013 900 THOMPSON ST MTZ Martinez
00014 724 ESCOBAR ST MTZ ' Martinez
00015 40 MUIR RD MTZ Martinez
00016 827/829 LAS JUNTAS ST MTZ Martinez
00017 4100 ALHAMBRA AVE MTZ Martinez
00019 630 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00019 630 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00020 938 MAIN ST MTZ Martinez
00022 738 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00023 822 MAIN ST MTZ Wrtinez
00024 826 MAIN STREET MTZ Martinez
00025 20 ALLEN ST MTZ Martinez
00026 524 MAIN ST MTZ Martinez '
00027 610 MARINA VISTA (WHSE) MTZ Martinez '
00028 730 LAS JUNTAS ST MTZ Martinez
00029 1220 MORELLO AVE MTZ Martinez -'
{x0030 1020 WARD ST MTZ Martinez
00030 1020 1020 WARD ST MTZ Martinez
00031 821 ESCOBAR ST MTZ Martinez
~
00032 1333 PINE ST, SUITE MTZ Martinez `
00033 q30 WARD ST MTZ Martinez
00034 30 MUIR RD MTZ Martinez
00034 30 MUIR RD MTZ Martinez
00035 50 GLACIER DR MTZ Martine
0003B 255 GLACIER QR MTZ Martinez �Q
00041 220 GLACIER DR . MTZ Martinez
~`
00044 202 GLACIENDR (JU\^ .ALL) MTZ Ma/ tinez ,
00045 100 GLACIER DR. MTZ Martinez '
00048 40 GLACIER DR MTZ Martinez ~'
00049 1801 SHELL AVE - Martinez �
00050 1801 SHELL AVE: KTZ Martinez
00051 1B81 SHELL AVE {WHSE) `` MTZ Martinez
00052 1801 SHELL AVE - MTZ Martinez - '-
00053 019 SHELL .AVE MTZ Martinez
00054 1619 SHELL AVE (WHSE) MTZ !�-Aartinez
00055 4849 IMHOFF DR (SPAY CL) MTZ ^ Martinez
00058 4849 IMHOFF DR MTZ Martinez
00057 100 37TH ST (ADMIN) RIC Richmond '
00058 100 38TH ST (HEALTH) RIC - Richmond
0005E3 100 38TH ST (HEALTH) RIC Richmond
00059 3939 BISSELL AVENUE RIC Richmond �
00080 254-256 24TH ST RIC Richmond
00061 189 & 199 PARKER AVE ROD Rodeo �
00062 2801 R MILLER DR RIC Richmond
00070 2301 R MILLER DR POOL RIC Richmond `
00072 945 BRO3KSIDE DR (CORP YD) RIC Richmond
.
Page c.; 2 '
/
07/01/92
BLDG ADDRESS CITYCJDE CITYNAME
00074 2525 STANWELL DR CON Concord
00075 3431 MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
00075 34MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
00080 ���9 PACHECO BL (DISC HSE) MTZ Martinez
00082 651 PINOLE SHORES DR PIN Pinole
00083 6323 MANILA AVE ELC El Cerrito
00085 1760 CHESTER ST PIT Pittsburg
00088 904 MELLUS ST MTZ. Martinez
00087 900 MELLUS ST MTZ Martinez
00088 2910 CUTTING BLVD RIC Richmond .
00090 2355 STANWELL` DR CON Concord
00091 725 MARINA VISTA (WHSE) MTZ Martinez .
00093 968 23RD ST RIC ^ Richmond
00094 ALEXANDER & POMONA ST CRO Crockett
00095 STOCKTON & KEARNY ST ELC El Cerrito
0,0096 343 RODEO AVE ROD Rodeo
00097 3707 BISSELL AVE RIC Richmond
00098 177 BROADWAY RIC Richmond ���
00099 3630 SAN PABLO DAM RD ELS El Sobrant
00099 3630 EAN PABLO DAM RD ELS El Sobrant --
00100 2025 SHERMAN DR PIN Pi�iole
001021750 OAK PARK BL PH Pleasant H
0Q103 1700 OAK PARK BL PH Pleasant H
'.�
00104 1950 PARKSIDE DR CON Concord '
00105 2371 STANWELL DG CON Concord
00105 2371 STANWELL DR CON Concord '
00107 3020 GRANT ST CON Concord
00115 2290 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord
00117 510 LA GONDA WAY DAN Danville
00121 161 J GLENN DR-ADMIN CON Conco d �
.' � Awl
00122 171 J GLENN DR-TOWER CON Concord
00123 260 J GLENN DR-GENL AIR CON Concord
.
00124 510 SALLY RIDE DR CON Concord
00126 BUCH FLD CON FLY CLUB CON Concord
- oocor
00127 BUCH FLD-POISON STORAGE CON Concord
00128,� 110 J GLENN DR-O/M HANGAR CON ' Concord
00129. 1960 MUIR RD MTZ Martinez
00129 1960 MUIR RD MTZ.1' �Mar nez
00130 1980 MUIR RDc MTZ ' Martinez
00%30.` 1980 MUIR RD ' MTZ � � Mart�nez
001�]1 815 COURT ST(PO)-STORAGE.' ''^ MTZ Martinez
00131 815 COURT ST(PO)-STORAGE Martinez
00132. 1320 ARNOLD DR STE 160 ' ' M- � Martinez
00133'. 729 CASTRO ST (CRIME LAB) MTZ'` Martinez
00134 627 FERRY ST � MTZ ' Martinez
00136' 401 ESC8BAR ST MTZ Martinez'
00l 4333 PACHECO BL -MTZ` . Martinez _ �
001313 ' 825 ARNOLD DR # 4 MTZMartinez '
'
00139.: . 825 ARNOLD DR # 3 MTZ� ' Martinez
0014(� ' 2020 N. BRnADWAY-STORAGE WC Walnut Cre
00140 2020 N. BROADWAY -_ WC Walnut Cre `
00141 210 BERRELLESA ST MTZ Martinez
00142 3338 MT DIABLO BL LAF Lafayette
o0143 640 YGNACIO VALLEY RD WC Walnut Cre
00144 120 HARTZ AVE DAN Danville
00145 MT DIABLO BL & FIRST ST LAF Lafayette
00146 1250 LOCUST ST WC Walnut Cre
30147 2366 STANWB-L CI� (WHSE>
. . .
. Page No . �
07/01 /52 /
BLDG' ADDRESS CITYCOnE CITYNAME
00150 45 CIVIC DR PIT Pittsburg - -
00150 "5 CIVIC DR PIT Pittsburg
00151 53 CIVIC DRIVE PIT Pittsburg
00153 EAST ^PTH & EAST ST PIT Pittsburg
00154 300 E. LELAND STE 100 PIT Pittsburg _
00156 2131 CRESTVIEW LANE PIT Pittsburg
00157 2047 B & C ARNOLD INDUST DRIVE CON Concord
00158 2099-D ARNOLD INDUSTRIAL WAY CON Concord
00159 1340 ARNOLD DRIVE MTZ Martinez -
00159 1340 ARNOLD DRIVE MTZ Martinez
00163 406 6TH ST ANT Antioch
00164 118 E. RUBY ST. OAK Oakley
00166 3981 WALNUT AVE BRE Brentwood
00167 16711 MARSH CREEK RD CLA ' Clayton
00168 118 OAK ST (CLINIC) BRE Brentwood
00171 FIRST & DAINTY ST BRE Brentwood
00172 635 WALNUT BL BRE Brentwood
00173 BYER C" BIXLER RDS BYR Byron
00182 MARSH CREEK RD-ADMIN CLA Clayton
30201 2500 ALHAMBRA AVE MTZ Martinez '
00227 1305 MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
00227 1305 MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
00228 24 GOREE CT (WHSE) MTZ Martinez
00229 ROCKY RIDGE DAN Danville � r~
00231 BUCHANAN FLD HANGAR BLDG D CON Concord
80233 2401 STANWELL DR CON Concord
00233 2401 STANWELL DR CON Concord
00234 BALD PEAK TIL Tilden Par
00235 KREGOR PEAK ' PIT Pittsburg
00238 NICHOLL KNOB RIC Richmond
00239 620 MARINA VISTA MTZ Martinez
00245 4545 DELTA FAIR BLVD ANT Antioch
00245 4545 DELTA FAIR BLVD ANT Antioch
00248 212 H STREET ANT Antioch
00247 213 & 215 G STREET ANT Antioch
00249 ' 525-527 2ND AVENUE ROD Rodeo
00249 525-527 2ND AVENUE ROD Rodeo
00250 323 SECOND ST ROD Rodeo .
<)0259~- 111 ALLEN ST MTZ Martinez
0026 |'.� IMHOFF DRIVE-RECYCLING CTR ' MTZ � Martinez
-, '
00262- NADEEW PEAK ' CRO Crockett �
^ °" .
00263 HIGHLAND PEAK Ax�n��/R Moraga
00268^ 500 COURT ST '
MTZ Martinez ^
00267 814 MAIN ST .� MTZ Martinez
00268 1019 CENTER AVE-CO MORGUE MTZ Martinez -
002691 597 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 140 ` MTZ Martinez
00270 3811 BISSELL AVE ^` RIC Richmond /'
00271 597 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 355 MTZ Martinez -
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (JUL 91-OCT 91 ) MTZ Martinez
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (NOV 91-FEB 92) MTZ Martinez '
00272 50 DOUGLAS OR (MAR 92-JUN 92) MTZ Martinez
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (CO CUST 7-2/92) MTZ Martinez ^�
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (CONTRACT CUST) MTZ Martinez '-
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (CONT CUST 11-1 ) MTZ Martinez -
00272 50 DOUGLAS DR (CO CUST 3-6/92) MTZ Martinez
00273 40 DOUGLAS DR MTZ Martinez
00273 40 DOUGLAS DR MTZ Martinez
05274 so nouS/ ?p Dr-,,2 MTZ Mortinez
.
V7/01/92 ,
'BLDG ADDRESS CITYCODE CITYNAME '
30276 517 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 300 MTZ Martinez
}0277 ST5 CENTER AVE MTZ Martinez
00279 097 CENTER AVE STE 260 MTZ Martinez
00279 5c7 CENTER AVE STE 280 MTZ Martinez
00280 597 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 200 MTZ Martinez
00281 3029 MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
00282 610 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00282 610 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00283 624 FERRY ST MTZ Martinez -
00284 GARCIA RANCH ROAD BRI Briones
00285 597 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 310 MTZ Martinez
00286 2280 GIANT RD SP San Pablo
00287 2923 MACDONALD AVE SP San Pablo
00288 597 CENTER AVENUE SUITE 330 MTZ ' Martinez
00289 1515 MARKET ST SP San Pablo
00290 1121 DETROIT AVE CON Concord
00291 1401 4TH ST ANT Antioch
00292 597 CENTER AVENUE, SUITE 305 MTZ Martinez
00293 1391 SHELL AVE MTZ Martinez
00300 724 THIRD ST BRE Brentwood
00301 2025 PORT CHI HWY CON Concord
00302 2476 PACHECO ST CON CjAord
00310 1820 PEERLESS AVE ELC El Cerrito
30311 2586 APPIAN WAY ELS El Sobrant
00317 16415 SAN PABLO AVE SP San Pablo �
D0320 2555 EL PORTAL DRIVE SP San Pablo
30321 2523 EL PORTAL DRIVE SP San Pablo
}0323 2425 BISSO LANE CON Concord
00323 2425 BISSO LANE CON Concord
00324 11 NO COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00325 RICHMOND MARINA BERTH G101 RIC Richmond
10326 500 SCHOOL ST PIT Pittsburg
00327 606 FERRY MTZ Martinez
00328 515 SCHOOL ST PIT Pittsburg
00330 2301 STANWELL DR CON Concord
}0330 2301 STANWELL DR ' CON Concord
30332� 850 POMONA ST . CRO Crockett
'/
}0333 550 SCHOOL ST PIT Pittsburg
00335 2400 SYCAMORL AVE STE 36 "' ANT Antioch
}033S 16V ALAMO PLAZA AL Alamo
30340 4061 PORT CHICAGO HWY -'` CON Concord
}0343 600 RAILROAD AVE ------ - Pittsburg
30344 2201 HARBOR 8T PI- _ Pittsburg
}0345 49 CANYON LAKE DR _ PC Port Costa
00350 2970 WILLOW PASS RD COW Concord
)0350 2970 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord
30351 3018 WILLOW PASS RD STE 208 ' CON Concord '
}0352 3052 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord
}0353 3018 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord '
}0354 3024 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord '
}0357 35TH & MACDONALD AVE RIC Richmond
}0359 3045 RESEARCH DR RIC Richmond
}0359 3045 RESEARCH DR RIC Richmond
)0360 3043 RESEARCH DR RIC Richmond
}0361 232 BROADWAY RIC Richmond
v0362 1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE # 5 RIC Richmond
}0364 2086 COMMERCE AVE CON Concord
`0365 2090 COMMEPCE AVE CON ronrn,H
BLDG ADDRESS CITYCODE CITYNAME
Jt �'
4 00372 2475 WATERBIRD WAY MTS' Martine
=x 00372 2475 WATERBIRD WAY MTZ Martinez
� 003754785 GLUM RD MTZ Martinez
00376 2471 WATERBIRD WAY MTZ Martinez
00380 210 GLACIER DR ` MTZ Martinez
00390 5555 GIANT HWY RIC Richmond
35 00406 805 LAS JUNTAS MTZ Martinez
' 00451 501 WEST 18TH ST Jn, ANT Antioch
00452 648 SECOND ST FIRE Brentwood
q 00454 291.0 SALVIO ST CON Concord
00455 991 LORING ST CRO Crockett
00456 555 S. HARTZ AVE vAAN. Danville
00457 6510 STOCN'TON AVE ELC _ E1 Cerrito
00455 4191 APF'I AN WAY 7 ELS El Sobr ant
00459 61 ARLINGTON AVE � ' KEN Kensington
00460 952 MORAGA RD -_ ...LAF Laffayette
00461 740 COURT ST MTZ Martinez
00462 1500 ST MARY'S RD OVHOR Moraga
00463 2 IRWIN WAY AAORI Orinda
_ 00464 100 MONTGOMERY ST SR San Ramon
=' 00465 2935 PINOLE VALLEY RD PIN Pinole
:.. .
i 00466 80 POWER ST PIT Pittsburg
,-'.►�.
00467 220 PACIFIC AVE ROD Rodeo
00465 2101 MARKET ST SF' San Pablo
00469 1644 NORTH BROADWAY WC Walnut Cre
00470 2661 OAS:: GROVE RD WC Walnut Cre
00471 751 THIRD ST BRE Brentwood
1 00702 HOOKSTON MONUMENT PH Pleasant H
00800 2700 11TH ST (LAKE) SP San Pablo
00SO1 1014 FLORIDA AVE (MARITIME) RIC Richmond
00812 2730 MAINE AVE (PULLMAN) RIC Richmond
0 tB03 5050 HARNETT (CRESCENT PK) RIC Richmond
0804 989 1STH ST (BEIDING SCHOOL) RIC Richmond
0080 5 1655 FOL_SOM ST (Davis Park ) RIC Richmond
0816 2M GROOM DRIVE RIC Richmond
0808 230 HARBOUR WAY SOUTH RIC R i chmand
00809 570 BEATRICE RD PH Pleasant H
C OS 14 1420 L I VORNA RD AL. Alamo
00816 4300 GARDEN RD ELS F_1 5obrant
005 I S 1456 PASED NOGALES AL Alamo
00821 2565 OAK RD WC Walnut Cre
OOS23 300 ARMSTRONG RD BYR Byron
OOS25 113 BROOKSIDE DR RIC Richmond
00,926 1192 GEARY RD PH Pleasant H
OOe2S 1334 LAS JUNTAS WAY PH Pleasant H
00830 180' CAMIND PABLO ORI Orinda
Q0831 176 CAMINO PABLO ORI Orinda
.00832 25 NORTH LANE ORI Orinda
00833 576 BEATRICE RD PH Pleasant H
00834 1236 ESCOBAR ST MT2 Martine
OOSS5 Sal & SSS L STREE=T
MTS Martinez
00537 1201 PENNSYLVANIA RIC Richmond
00?39 ROUTE ` BOX 13S BRE Brentwood
00840 RT 3 BOX 5 HIGHWAY 4 OAK Oakley
00841 1557 LAUREL RD OAK Oakley
00842 5183 VALLEY VIEW RD ELS El Sobr_ nt
01843 981 CASTLE ROCK RD WC Walnut Cr'o
00844 2 5 �.ROOKS DE DR Richmond
L. f:J _!f�.J'JI'.,_/I_� RIC
Pag�
0- IC
/
~=~
.BLDG ADDRESS CITYCODE CITYNAME -
00847 1127 ESCOBAR ST MTZ Martinez ~
�0848 z �39 ESCOSAR ST MTZ Martinez
O0850 30�D ARMSTRONG RD f.Y R Byron
�0851 1355 WILLOW WAY, SUITE 221 CON Concord
00852 315 W. 10TH ST. ANT Antioch
�0853 2900 LONE TREE WAY ANT Antioch
00854 2717 GENTRY TOWN DR. ANT Antioch'
00855 6TH & CUMBERLAND PIT Pittsburg
00856 2555 HARBOR ST. PIT Pittsburg
00857 3000 WILLOW PASS RD WPT W.Pittsbrg
0O858 4527 QEERF%ELD DR. ANT Antioch
00B59 1500 W. 4TH ST. , ANT Antioch
00866 2222 CAMINO RAMON SR San Ramon
00867 3521 COUNTRY CLUB PL. BH Black Hawk
0086B 26 ORINDA WAY ORI Orinda
00869 75 SANTA BARBARA PH Pleasant H
00875 2010 GEARY RD PH Pleasant H
30876 2900 DOROTHY DR. WC Walnut Cre ����
���.
00877 1330 CIVIC DR. WC Walnut Cre
�0B7B 2012 GE~ RY RD PH Pleasant H
00879 2273 WYTE PARK AVE WC Walnut Cre
J0880 700 HAWTHORNE DR. WC Wjrnut Cre
00881 205 BOYD RD PH Pleasant H
00882 2210 WILLOW PASS RD CON Concord �
00883 1050 WALNUT AVENUE WC WALNUT CRK '
00884 ' 4647 CLAYTON ROAD CON CONCORD
00885 209 CENTER STREET PAC PACHECO `
00886 2955 TREAT BOULEVARD CON CONCORD
00887 2945 TREAT BOULEVARD CON CONCORD
00888 2951 TREAT BOULEVARD CON CONCORD
00889 5850 CLAYTON ROAD CLA CLAYTON
00890 1240 SHELL AVENUE MTZ MARTINEZ
00891 251 CHURCH STREET MTZ MARTINEZ
00892 521 JONES- STREET MTZ MARTINEZ
00893 3338 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAF LAFAYETTE
00894 4007 LOS ARABIS ' LAF LAFAYETTE.
00895620 ST. MARY 'S ROAD / LAF'� �/ LAFAYETTE
00898 145 SUSSEX STREET CLD` CLYDE
p0897 1019 GARCIA 'RANCH ROAD ' MTZ ' MARTINEZ
00898 3675 MT. DIABLO BLVD. ,STE. 100 LAF LAFAYETTE
00899 12000 MARSH CREEK ROAD � � CLA CLAYTON
00900 1280 MORAGA WAY # - � . ` MORAGA
--9- wa;
00901 330 25TH STREET RICHMOND
00902 4640 APPIAN WAY, #69 ELS�- EL SOBRANT
00903 13928 SAN PABLO AVE. , #70 SP SAN PABLO
00904 331 RHEEM BLVD. #2 . ��' RIC RICHMOND
00905 600 F STREET MTZ MARTINEZ
'
- ~ `
`-
`
Q
eo
� N
N $ o a g
ei
ro
Q.
� s8 a N z
a �
� a
v�' o
rM r
fit
,• N �y
rofiJ C4cc
J�
N � �
0
Y G0
Q
o.
7
0
EXHIBIT B
1993TDM WORK PROGRAM
The following tasks will be performed by the Community Development
Department during 1993 for the County Employee TDM Program.
1.0 COUNTY TDM ORDINANCE
1. 1 Cooperate with the four CCTA regional transportation
planning committees in regional administration of TDM
programs.
1. 2 Implement BAAQMD Trip Reduction Rule requirements.
2.0 PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA TDM PROGRAM
2 . 1 Administer agreement with Contra Costa Centre Association
for management of TDM program and staff Pleasant Hill
BART TDM Advisory Committee.
2 .2 Coordinate with TRANSPAC on regional administration of
Station Area TDM program.
3.0 COUNTY EMPLOYEE TDM PROGRAM
3 . 1 DATA COLLECTION
3 . 1. 1 Maintain an inventory of County employment
locations, including departments, number of
employees, etc.
3 . 1.2 Prepare map of work sites.
3 . 1. 3 Conduct employee survey.
3 .2 TDM INFORMATION PROGRAM
3 . 2 . 1 Develop TDM Building Coordinator Program for
information dissemination to employees for
options of commute alternatives and air
quality improvement during Spare the Air Days.
3 .2 . 2 Prepare brochure of available employee TDM
services.
3 . 2 . 3 Provide TDM information during orientation of
new employees.
3 . 2 . 4 Coordinate with Transit Providers in marketing
transit services.
3 . 3 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVES PROGRAM
3 . 3 . 1 Establish Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program.
3 . 3 .2 Evaluate and implement monetary and gift
incentives.
3 . 3 . 3 Evaluate need for additional bicycle parking
facilities and showers at County work sites.
3 .4 PARKING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
3 .4 . 1 Evaluate ability to provide preferred parking
spaces for carpoolers at other county
facilities.
3 .4 . 2 Evaluate feasibility of parking charges.
3 . 5 COUNTY EMPLOYEE COMMUTE POOL PROGRAM
3 . 5. 1 Conduct employee orientation meetings.
3 .6 TELECOMMUTING POLICY
3 . 6. 1 Evaluate Pilot Program
3 . 6.2 Staff Telecommuting Committee
3 . 6. 3 Develop Recommendations to the Board of
Supervisors
dp/BO/tdm.93