Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10081991 - S.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Supervisor Tom Torlakson Contra October 8, 1991 "Osla DATE: INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF NON-COMPLIANCE OF COND(io 'County SUI3JECT:APPROVAL FOR WILLOWBROOK HOUSING PROJECT IN WEST PITTSBURG SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDED ACTION: A. Refer to the Growth Management & Economic Development Agency to investigate allegations of non-compliance with conditions of approval by the management of the Willowbrook Apartment Complex in West Pittsburg, a HUD subsidized housing project. B. Refer to the County Administrator' s Office to coordinate an investigation by the Housing Authority, the Sheriff' s Department, the District Attorney, the Community Development Department and County Counsel to: ( 1 ) determine what legal means the county has to enforce conditions of their land use permit or other entitlements; ( 2) work with county and federal agencies to -develop resources to improve the management, including the performance of the Burger Company and the investment of the owner in security and physical improvements and possibly a police assessment ,district; (3 ) contact HUD to determine what authority they may impose to require the property manager to implement adequate security protection for the residents and impose a more thorough review of applicants for apartments, and provide other funding or help for , staffing and capital improvements; (4 ) address the continuing problems with trespassing 'and loitering. (5) consider implementation of a "Safe Streets Now"Program in the county to be applied at this project; ( 6 ) identify legal recourse available for a takeover of the project by the County Housing Authority; C. Refer staff reports from A and B above to the Finance Committee. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: �� YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD.COMMITTEE' ': APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON October 8, 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES:OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN: CC: GEMDA ATTESTED October 8, 1991' County Administrator Phil Batchelor;Clerk of the Board, Housing AuthorityI Supervisors upernsors and ripunty H(�lillI11S1iatOt ; District Attorney M382/7.99mmunity Development BY DEPUTY County Counsel J October 8, 1991 Page TWO BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This housing project was approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1982 with a set of conditions, including a social director and security measures . Over the past several months, my office has received numerous complaints of drug dealing in the complex. There is a serious erosion of the security and quality of life in this neighborhood due to the lack of proper management and lack of compliance with the county conditions for a land use permit. The management company and owner have failed to adequately manage the project. They have not had capable or effective on-site management. The progress made in resolving problems in cooperation with the Sheriff ' s Department in 1988 and 1989 has been undone. Problems have worsened to a degree similar to what we faced at El Pueblo a few years ago. At present, management has pledged to work with the county to resolve the problems, and just this week a maintenance person and day manager have been hired. However, some long term solutions need to be thoroughly explored as well as short term steps to improve safety and crime problems .