Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10021990 - IO.4 • IOC '4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: Internal Operations Committee =- s Costa September 20, 1990 County sT , DATE: °a,`a'cooK`� cP SUBJECT: Proposed Response to the Report of the 1989-90 Grand Jury: "Juvenile Detention Facilities" SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. - Adopt this report of our Committee as the Board of Supervisors' response to the Report of the 1989-90 Grand Jury: "Juvenile Detention Facilities." 2. Request County Administrator to advise the Juvenile Justice/Delinquency Prevention Commission and employees of the Probation Department that the Board of Supervisors does currently have possession of the report of Peat Marwick Main, and will release the report as soon as it is released by the Grand Jury and becomes ,public information. 3. Remove this item as a referral to our Committee. BACKGROUND On June 12', 1990 the 1989-90 Grand Jury submitted the report entitled "Juvenile Detention Facilities" which was subsequently referred to the Internal Operations Committee. On September 20, 1990 our Committee met to discuss the recommendations and review proposed responses. At the conclusion of these discussions we prepared the attached response utilizing a format suggested by a previous Grand Jury which requested that responses clearly specify: A. Whether the recommendation is accepted or adopted; B. If the recommendation is accepted, a statement as to who will be responsible for implementation and a definite target date; C. A delineation of constraints if a recommendation is accepted but cannot be implemented within the calendar year; and D. The reason for not adopting a recommendation. Responses to Grand Jury recommendations coming from our Committee will follow this format as closely as possible. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _!!LYES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMI A EE --;7 APPROVE. OTHER a SIGNATUREIS): Supervisor S. W. MCPeak Supervisor T. Powers ACTION OF BOARD ON October 2, 1990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT I I I ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: County Administrator ATTESTED Grand. Jury Foreman PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Probation Officer SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 3 BY DEPUTY M 82 (10/88) -2- Questions have been raised of Board Members by members of the Juvenile Justice/Delinquency Prevention Commission and individual employees of the Probation Department regarding why the Board of Supervisors would not release the management audit completed by Peat Marwick Main. The forewoman of the 1990-91 Grand Jury advised our Committee on September 20, 1990 that the Grand Jury has not yet received the report from Peat Marwick Main. She indicated that as soon as the Grand Jury receives the report they will take appropriate actions in as expeditious a manner as possible. The County Counsel s Office indicated to our Committee that the report is the property of the Grand Jury and the Board of Supervisors cannot gain access to the report until it is released to the Board of Supervisors by the Grand Jury. I� a Iia JUVENILE DETENTION FACILITIES Recommendation No. 1 The County Administrator provide funding for an outside, independent, full-management audit of the Contra Costa County Probation Department to be supervised by the Grand Jury. Response A. This recommendation was adopted. B. On May 22, 1990 the Board of Supervisors authorized the County. Administrator to meet with the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court and the Juvenile Court Judge in relation to this request. On May 29, 1990 Peat, Marwick Main and Company agreed to conduct for the Grand Jury a management review of the Probation Department focusing on the juvenile and institutions aspects of the department. The Grand Jury is awaiting receipt of the final report.