Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01091990 - 1.27 CLAIM -27 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9, 19470 and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government -Code Amount: Undetermined Section 913 and 915.4. Please note all llwre lrl, CLAIMANT: STEPTORE Luella g ATTORNEY: Date received ADDRESS: 2955 Clearland Circle BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON December 5, 1989 Pittsburg, CA 94565 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: December 4, 1989 1. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. December 11 1989 HHBATCHELOR, Clerk DATED: BPpYIL: Deputy II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely'filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: 121 111 J5 BY: I-� r - / Deputy County Counsel 0 \U III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). IV. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present ( This Claim is rejected in full . ( ) Other; I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. n Dated: J A N b PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By Deputy Clerk WARNING (Gov. code section 913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown [above. Dated: AN 9 19 JBY: PHIL BATCHELOR byDeputy Clerk CC: County Counsel County Administrator Claim to: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANT A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for injury to person or to per- sonal property or growing crops and which accrue on or before December 31, 19879 must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops and which accrue on or after January 1, 1988, must be presented not later than six months after. the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Govt. Code §911.2.) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553• C. If. claim °is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, ,-rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled, in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at the end of this form. RE: Claim By ) Reserved for Clerk's filing stamp L ukc�*_ Siwe pre_ RECEIVED Against the County of Contra Costa > D E C 5 1989 n or - ) C See no CO�1S�Y1(,1 L2csri� U� PHIL BATCHELOR District). CLERK80 M 0 OF SUPERVISORS COSTA CO. . Fill in name ) By ''•.•.. oeputy The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against .the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of $ and in support of this claim represents as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour) Se ,iN1,b2+� i 8� CO p� ------- ---=--------------------------------------------------L--------------------- 2. Where did the damage or injury occur? (Include city and county) 9 5 5 C (ems,e 1 a C. P '4s 6Uur , Cts- Oon+�o &stDl �w 3. How did the .damage or injury occur? (Give full details; use extra paper if required) 4. What particular act or omission on the part of county or district officers, servants or employees caused the injury or damage? (over) V 5. What are the names of county or district officers, servants or employees causing , the damage or injury? -- � t =--- - -- env �OUIio[Z -61:x_ v 5. What damage or injuries you claim resulted? (Give full extent_ of injuries damages claimed. Attach two estimates for auto damage. a Spr�rlKler�c�5t�.�n DrUSS.LCLM� • Q I�Utscvn K.tt��-velvet 1(5 � F -- e, --- ---------- - r 4--��.-a�a.L-4—� �g �_� --- 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage.) � 73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Names and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospitals. L14o, Sco+4- �i�Mand Sm'th 2�i��o Cteci�LAr C� P� 4sCom.. L ��ltov\s i.O - 9. List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE IT}EM �+ AMOUNT ' _r r /? f UUP rt_�J(- a ��" -�1. r^:r P•�`{1Gl':�`sM ass�se` ��J h0.a F�� �y�.l�s • t Gov: -Code Sec. 910.2 provides: f The claim must be signed by the claimant3q' e 'n + SEND NOfI,C or by some person on his behalf." Name and'"Address,lof =A-Vtdi ney -A # I'll/k!� •rv+w+..v,.1m_.er+:r.A'Cw'.+.kv..e.w..+Wnxru Claimant's Signature r��JSS lea �Q rcc� �/0 Address Telephone No. Telephone No. Ll `1-59 7 / N 0 T I C E Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, city or district board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is punishable either by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year, by a fine of not exceeding one thousand ($1,000), or by both such imprisonment and fine, or by imprisonment in the state prison, by a fine of not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine. Lava ; oo-O ov 92R55 r T � r P' rw IK C:3 t�x r Ito cisme n cv�siv 1 � � 111 ,s CLAIM d7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION the Boar,, of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9, 1990 and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code Amount: $430.002 Section 913 and 915.4. Please note all CLAIMANT: THOMPSON, Johnnie B. ATTORNEY: ���'� Date received CA �� ADDRESS: P.O. Box 2103 BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON December 6, 1989 (hand delivered) Richmond, CA BY MAIL POSTMARKED: I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. December 11 1989 EVIL BATCHELOR, Clerk DATED: BY: Deputy II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of upervisors �v ) This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: 12/11 BY: LA Deputy County Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). IV. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present &I This Claim is rejected in full . ( ) Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy o.f the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. Dated:JA N 9 , 1990 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By Deputy Clerk I WARNING (Gov. code section 913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. i You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult I an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: JAN 9 1990 BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by Deputy Clerk CC: County Counsel County Administrator :GAIm To- BOARD OF S1) ERVT=�ORS OF CONTRA CO A Cc�i �"'�' j Fe.ur�5 bRi ii m1 ap illeatlon t'j: Instructions to Claimant Clerk of the Board f P.O. Box 911 Martinez,Californijk 94533 A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or mor injury to person or to personal prop:-:rty or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating ti) any other cause of action must be presented not later than ox'e year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911. 2, Gc:vt. Code) B. Claims must be- filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106 , County .._Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez , California 94553. C. If claim is against a distr:_ct governed by. the Board of Supervisors , rather than the County, thei name of the District should be filled in,. D. If the claim is against mora:. than one public entity, separate claims must oe filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, PenLl Code Sec. 72 at end of this form. , RE: Claim by 22 ) Reserved .for Clerk' s filing. tamps. Jn n ie,. _rDo -� RECEIVED , Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) DEC ( 1969 or DI; TRICT) PHIL BATCHELOR i.r. name) CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The undersigned _.:__= CONT OSTACO. B • r g claimant hereby makes claim agains e Iy of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of $ and in support of this claim represents as follows : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour) V� ___�-.--------------------- ------.. .--------------------------------------- 2. Where did the damage or injury occur? (include city and county) ----------- _ ---------------------------- --_.._----- 2. ::ow d_'.�3 the damage or injury riccur? (Give full dRta41s , use extra sheet if regbix e'd) -------------_.- ,..-:----------------------------------- --- 4 . What particular act or omit s:.oz, on the part of county or district officers , servants or employf.es caused the injury or damage'? (over) '.: ,..:,:•fiat. ar-e the....names of county or district officers, servants or j employees.-causing the damage or injury? - -- - - -------------------------•---------------------------- 6-.--Wh-at-damage----- or injuries do you claim resulted? (Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates for auto damage) - w1 -- -----==------- -------------------------- ----- ---------- -- --- ----- --- -- -- 7 . How was the amount claimed above computad? (Include the estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage. ) 430 _. So Names and addresses of wi _,resses , ' c�.octors and hospitals.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 . is the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: �....DAT.E-.,.., _,,.. .. _.x. ..._..,,. !TL'M 7--MOUNT IW � . Govt. Code Sec. 910 . 2 provides . "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or ome person on his behalf. " Name and Address of •Attorney Claiman s Signature _ v A ress Telephone No. Telephone No. s �*it#+eyt*******�c-**ic*,r**�k'******�c*�c*�t*�'*st:<:ir******�c,r�Y***�r**tk�c*�t*�t****x`'A•***�. ,.�e�:,�;t ;, '• iia^":�:CE Section 72 of the Penal. Code provide:: r . "Every person who, with intert t.o .defraud, presents forr allowance or C for payment to any state, board or off;.-cer , or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized -to allow or nay the same if genuine , any false or fraudulent claim, bill , account , voucher , or writing , is guilty of a felony. " a PROPERTY/CLOTHING RECEIPT .. --CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Ric. No. x,6652 FACILITY i - � acK�= MDF r. DATE: G i.%' Lx enx.:. MC D F PROP.$QX W F C ic ! NAME: OTHER BOOKING NBR: 7CASH _T/s LOUSEDRESS== (]TIE/SCARF /JACKETSJPA IESJEWELRYS/NY NSTER) T.SHIRT WATCH T-VSK ES/BOOS - --- WALLET IT/BRA D - Q HAT/PURSE KEYS _-KNIFE ,.. GLASSES © OTHER !-f ? BKG OFC: X j�-y�.• INMATE SIGNATURE. .._ , ave received all of my per . n ( property --and -clothing _ •.:. :. -..� —• PATE -•-..�.--.••-•,,,,.,�'� = ;• � _. .— REL-OFC. INMATE SIGNATURE .�. '•_T�;•�l" 'L:e�"-."tom" �?' � � -ei�'f+..�: k. x•w. - .' ,-. nx7.. ���iY � ,kb"WCM1R,R _ „s^.+•—mow,•. iYviJ:. a Iw !!•d�� ., •f , I I is "— ....... , �< CONTRA COSTA urc.,, - ....-^,4;iLITY PROPERTY RECEIPT DATE: a?:`26:`-i?c'a REC: FACILITY: ; TIME: ���� I•q,;; NAME: f'rISF 'StSIJ :3vs $1IE H 'D.O.B.: PROPERTY :• BOOKING NBR: uJ0 ITEM UNDER COUNTER: Y OR N INTAKE CASH: $ I " i JEWELRY: DESC: i I WATCH: t,J DESC: i LIGHTER: WALLET/PURSE: KEYS: U GLASSES: f N BELT: t t KNIFE: h! OTHER: BKG OFC: 4.1;��,j f RELEASE t � DATE: I HAVE R EIVED ALL OF MY / PERSO L PROPERTY. REL OFC: X I INMATE SIGNATURE CLAIM 7 y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9, 19 qo and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code Amount: $200.00 Section 913 and 915.4. Please note^1©1 "Warnings". �e!'1$Y counsel RUBIO, Gidvanni A C- G � 1 19 ATTORNEY: Date received �� 1nE�. CA ,P•4.553 ADDRESS: 3085 Avon Lane BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON December 6. 1989_ San Pablo, CA 94806 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: December 4, 1989 1. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. ppHH gg DATED: December 11, 1989 BYjL DeputyLOR, Clerk 11. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: �y BY: ' Deputy County Counsel U \__1 ir 111. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). 1V. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Superviscrs present (' ) This Claim is rejected in full. ( ) Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy o.f the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. Dated: JAN 9 1990 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By Deputy Clerk or WARNING (Gov. code section 913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: JAN 9 1990 BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by Deputy Clerk. CC: County Counsel County Administrator . TCS• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF rS:3T?'.A q ;Co! ;ry ` S`e2'ur i M appllcatlen to: Instructions t;,, 'C1.: ant Clerk of the Board P.O.Box 911 Martinez,California 94533 A. Claims relating to causes of action for -or sor i.rf.3ury to person or to personal property or growim.g :=-ops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other =-mse .t,f :action must be presented not later than one year after ;� •azz_rual of the cause of action. (Sec. . 911. 2 , Govt. Code) B. Claims must be- filed with .the Clerk of the :Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106 , County _A_ cmi-ril.stration Building, 651 Pine . Street, Martinez , California 94553: C. If claim is against a district governed. 'faro -th,a Board of Sun_ ervisors , rather than the County, the name of* tra3 ;D str..ict should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one pmblf:z ?nt ty, separate claims must be filed against each public entity.. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent cla-L-ms, Code Sec. 72 at end of� this form. RE: Claim by ) Res;e r . , -d .=:or Clerk' s filing stamps 'Gzayaty/w Pu 16 7a It lcifl Against the :rOUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) OEC. 61989 Phq t BATCHELOR or DISTRICT) «E°?.�3o4cnOccupcRVISORS C-( ,^' ,is y iA.CO. , (Fill in name) ) E ............ De uty . The undersigned claimant hereby makes clam ag..:a=st the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the s•:rm zf 100 . 00 =--��– . and in support of this claim represents as� r—� 1. When cid the da age or injury occur.? ;(,Give pct date and hour) artctArt,4 - 91 L, 1' (� W l-+f rl " Li,,w -Tt> U_-�o rr_ 2. Where did the damage or injt6:y occur?� (3nzluda :city and county) Co 4TRk 00,77A Cou 4-14 TAI t 3. How di the damage or injury occur? �`jGive , 1n11 details, use extra sheets if required) MA r9',nj L� t>trLW ,_OA ;A L, y +j Lo c6+VS.s at.1-4- Sl�as�s ------ ---------------------------------- - --------- --------- A-What particular act or omission on the Fast of county or district of-ficers , servants or employees caused. the. =JjJjury or damage? Iv X51 ; L�ti a iWJ 4.ra-rl�, (over) r' iat: are...the..names of county or d's t a, lzf, s, :servamts or J employees causing the damage or inJ=,y? -Coq -a.Pr6. What damage or injuries do you cla-dm r: fain extent of injuries or damages claimed. ;M3�i trimrat dos auto damage) 7 . How was the amount cleimed above�cc�uipx�+=�� � ((�x�u �h� estimated amount of any prospective injury B. Oa em ) �.urr4�►� GosY O� ��,�� Ac��.r� C�o�l. �,.r� ------------------------------------..�,e� ---------- S. Names and addresses of witnesses„ dnz=.-mam arm —----- , --. L----ist----- the--------------`----made--- --o�expenditures you y :ate- rt, of ;t'Lh-s �c nt for injury: 9 DATE -: .. "?'E'12 'T Ha��et '1b e�P Inc L Ault r PR Nr� Zo. 6�b U Pt 2 Sr A r f--q--ti4•S 1 0 ® t7 ***t.****************it***************'At:at'::l.iP:-Rnei;+3.•�c'��r-ite-d,-�-�i ,,p,�yc;�k� # '.kik.**�F*****i** G xt- Ctm�v Saa.. TDILM-2 provides : e,-- eTzEd,m1 3-Jgxmd lv the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) ire rn Baa his behalr. ' Name and Address ofAttorney (M. :-rL-MIft.°'s :Si:gnature 30$5 AvvtJ LAN-,F- AN AN-,FAdv I , (UNIN Telephone No. Ineqat!tcnes 3 6 NOIME Section 72 of the Penal Code provides:. "Every person who, with intert te) :au°c ,, ,s; Twr allowance _ or for payment to any state• board or of�# ;,, o� ttm ante -Mwn, city district, ward or village board or oft-ci z,,; ara - t- = <allicru• or pay the same if genuine , any false or frzu :e'. ; allaLm,, �rai•i1 • „ acctolunt , voucher, or writing , is guilty of a felony. " I a Z v� Z N o �o c p N �; v i mss+ n oun n 31, Z o 0, 0 -5070a 3 esu T' { .• i m N m � c„ m� A o n. � m O o -Z m rn n � 0 ro yn Z m N ' O O N O � 01 ..1 Ci NC rn 2 rn p m r 8 vo c� N � ,.ycn N W 6cKV 0-4 l/ SU w= W 0.No O 11 G' W ,( V t i i Z X0 fG '4 ` Q 0 r r CLAIM ��7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION . the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9, 19 r-/O and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code Amount: $80.00 Section 913 and 915.4. Please note all "Warnings". CLAIMANT: LEWIS, James John c®unty c®ur,S ATTORNEY: DCC _ �1 Date received , U j ADDRESS: 1331 William Way BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON Dece&V9 1 -office) Concord, CA 94520 94,553 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. ppHH gg DATED: December 11, 1989 EVIL DeputyLOR, Clerk 4ff II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of S visors This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: BY: Aup� Deputy County Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). IV. BOARD ORDER- By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present ( This Claim is rejected in full . ( ) Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. cin0 Dated: JAN 9 199PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By + Deputy Clerk WARNING (Gov. code section 913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that. I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: AN 9 19 BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by Deputy Clerk CC: County Counsel County Administrator ' ,CLAIM% TC� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COTtA �Sg `�5v e ur i Al application to: Instructions to Claimant Clerk of the Board P.O. Box 911 A. `Claims relating to causes of action for death or =or njurynitao4533 person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual -of the cause of action. (Sec. 911. 2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be__ fi_ led with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106 , County ,_Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez , California 94553. C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors , rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in.' D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Pend Code Sec. 72 at end OIL -his form. ; RE: Claim by .) Reserved for Clerk' s filing stamps i3 cv,f •� wKL GENE 64YSp�c� ) Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA)_ 4 1989 /,, ) 7 PHI EA.TCHftOR Or �IotJ�iN£�. IJ�TF T10N figGdi"7 ISTRICT) C!_::'::9OARDOFSUPERVISORS (Fill in name) / . The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of. $ Q and in support of this claim represents as follows : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. When did the damage o injury occur? (Give exact aate and hour) --- --- N------------------------------------------------------------� F 2. Where id the damage or incur occur? (Include city and county) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. How did the damage or injury occur / ( ive full deta ls, use extra sheets if required) '^ t v S 1 O cc.-j 7 ` l T C (-Y f !� ' T cv/71 dale rvµ f 4 What particular act or omission on the part of county or district officers , servan s or employees caused he injury or damage? (over) fiat. ar.e.:the...names of county or district officers, servants or � f employees.i causingthe damage or i 'ury? ` --------------------------------------------------------- 6. What damage or injuries do you claim resulted? (Give full extent of injuries or damages Claimed. Att ch two estimates for auto damage) Y2 6x) -- - ------------------------------------------ 7 . How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the timate amount of any prospective injury or damage. ) G U S Q Ccs s� i RwC,� loc- . / K.—KI-am-es---8. Names and addresses of witnesses , doctors and hospitals. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 . List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE ` ITEM. MMOUNT Govt. Code Sec. 910 .2 provides : "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or by some oers n' gn his behalf. " Name and Address of 'Attorney �� t' _ Signature Add r ss t f f Telephone No. - Telephone No(4/rJ X& -,5-yd/ NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intert to defraud, presen}`s for allowance or for payment to any state', board or officer , or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine , anv false or fraudulent claim, bill, account , voucher , or writing , is guilty of a felony. " CLAIM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9, 1990 and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code Amount: $50,000.00 Section 913 and 915.4. Please note all 11Warnfn4V11.1p CLAIMANT: FLORES, Sandra by guardian Flores, Carmen 1 � V09 ATTORNEY: - i �� Robert J. Beles Date received ADDRESS: 1401 Lakeside Drive, Ste. 700 BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON December 8, 1989 D� Oakland, CA 94612 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: December 7, 1989 I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. DATED: December 11, 1989 Bp gIL BATCHELOR, Clerk eputy 1I.\,FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Su visors (� ) This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: II BY:1J Deputy County Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). 1V. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present This Claim is rejected in full . ( ) Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's.Order entered in its minutes for this date. Dated: 1 A 9 199 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By Deputy Clerk WARNING (Gov. code se4r6`(913) 913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: JAN 9 1990 BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by Deputy Clerk CC: County Counsel County Administrator R CSIV � DEC- 81989 PH:',BATCHELOR CLERK;:OARD OF SUPE;VISORS B CO.,,:i?•+CO TA CO. u CLAIM AGAINST THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CLAIMANT'S NAME: SANDRA FLORES by her guardian CARMEN FLORES CLAIMANT'S ADDRESS: 2244 38th Avenue Telephone (415) 836-0100 Oakland, CA 94601 (Attorney) AMOUNT OF CLAIM $ 50 , 000. 00 ADDRESS TO WHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT: Robert J. Beles 1401 Lakeside Drive Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94612 DATE OF INCIDENT: July 17, 1989 LOCATION OF INCIDENT: 2244 38th Avenue, Oakland, County of Alameda, CA HOW DID INCIDENT OCCUR: Oakland Police Drug Unit and the Central Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Team served a search warrant on claimant's home. The officers pulled claimant to the floor holding her hands behind her back while a female police officer put her foot on claimant's back. Claimant was pulled outside the residence by her left arm. DESCRIBED INJURY OR DAMAGE: Claimant has residual muscle pain to left arm, left side of neck and back. Claimant is also suffering emotional distress due to the incident. NAME OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY OR DAMAGE, IF KNOWN: Unknown at this time. Signed by or on behalf of Claimant &,-e. / Dated: / �C ROBERT J. BELES uduvV ;�vv ruv . t-+ �1 �. O v ! � 1 0 (n Q1 En LH O rTj v) f-4 LO MEMM M Lo 0 ++ � Ra N t73 Ln N • 0 4-J UO J a tq N CO 0 .0 CL, F-4 4-) i LrT 0 rri H r 4 ri Lt 1d CC' u�p a i cq W CD w �= cn F a xM 00 :w' E Q 0 z > � Q 0 } Iwo W H zj =off o , � v u� ado : A W o - CLAIM �, a ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT January 9 , 1989 and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim by the Board of Supervisors (Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code Amount: $10S , 249 . 50 Section 913 and 915.4. Pleat oo�-It 1R15I+pi; gs". CLAIMANT: LOWENTHAL , Larry and Judy V! 1 6,II''' k . � n rt ATTORNEY: r axfi ez., .� A,`�� !A90 ; ::, Date received ADDRESS: 26 Camino Court BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON December 11 , 1989 (via Risk Lafayette, CA 94549 Mgmt. ) BY MAIL POSTMARKED: I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: .County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. ��IL gATCHELOR, Clerk DATED: December 13, 1989 : Deputy 11. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section. 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section.911.3). ( ) Other: Dated: 115 � �� BY: Aj ). Deputy County Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). IV. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Superviscrs present ( This Claim is rejected in full. ( ) Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy o.f the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. Dated: 'JAN 9 IM PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By Deputy Clerk WARNING (Gov. code section 3) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: JA N 9 1990 BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by Deputy Clerk. CC: County Counsel County Administrator . NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY AND/OR NON-ACCEPTANCE OF CLAIM TO: Larry d Judy Lowenthal 26 Camino ourt Lafayette, C 4549 Re: Claim of LARRY AND JUDY LOWENTHAL Please Take Notice As Follows: The claim you presented against the County of Contra Costa or District governed by the Board of Supervisors fails to comply substantially with the requirements of California Government Code section 910 and 910. 2, or is otherwise insufficient for the reasons checked below: 1 . The claim fails to state the name and post office address of the claimant. 2. The claim fails to state the post office address to which the person presenting the claim desires notices to be sent. x 3 . The claim fails to state the date, place or other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted. 4 . The claim fails to state the name(s) of the public employee(s) causing the injury, damage, or loss, if known. 5 . The claim fails to state whether the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000) . If the claim totals less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) , the claim fails to state the amount claimed as of the date of presentation, the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage or loss so far as known, or the basis of computation of the amount claimed. If the amount claimed exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000) , the claim fails to state whether jurisdiction over the claim would rest in municipal or superior court. 6 . The claim is not signed by the claimant or by some person on his behalf . 7 . Other: VICTOR J. WESTMAN, ounty Counsel 0 By: Deputy Co I y Coun CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL C.C.P. 99 1012, 1013a, 2015 .5: Evid. C. §§ 641 , 664) My business address is the County Counsel's Office of Contra Costa County, Co. Admin. Bldg., P.O.! Box 69, Martinez, California, 94553, and I am a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age, employed in Contra Costa County, and not a party to this action. I served a true copy of this Notice of Insufficiency and/or Non Acceptance of Claim by placing it in an envelope(s) addressed as shown above (which is/are place(s) having delivery service by U.S. Mail) , which envelope(s) was then sealed and postage fully prepaid thereon, and thereafter was, on this day deposited in the U.S. Mail at Martinez/Concord, Contra Costa County, California. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: c%-St at Martinez, California. cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (o iginal) f Risk Management (NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY OF ,CLAIM: GOV.C.§§ 910, 910 . 2, 920.4, 910 .8) t t C T :}j_t � Contra Costa County Community Development Departmenitt` , q Attn : Mary Fleming _ PH 11: 26 651 Pine Street Martinez , CA 94553 T �r=i'r '. -= -- October 11 , 1989 ``t"``'' -=r Dear Ms . Fleming , Last week , my husband Larry and I had a professional tree arborist/horticulturist out to do an evaluation on six trees on our property located at 618 Stagecoach Court , in Lafayette , because we noticed a rapid dying of our oak trees . The report states , three of our trees were killed and must be removed as soon as possible . The destruction of these valuable trees occurred during the careless construction of a drainage v-ditch . We feel compensation is in order , as the county supervised installation of the ditch . Talking to Byron Turner , he told us the project planner on this job is no longer with the county , but we should have no problem in getting restitution from the county ( see the report ) . . The trees ' value before the damage was done : Tree #1 - $44 ,874 .00 ; Tree #3 - $42 ,941 ; and Tree #4 - $8 ,432 . Total value of trees undamaged was $96 ,297 .00 . Secondly , the cost of having these trees removed is approximately $7500 .00 . Thirdly , replacing said trees is impossible , but planting new trees to start growing as a replacement for the dead trees comes to about $300 .00 a tree . Fourth , cost of the needed evaluation was $552 .50 . Total damage , including property value decreased comes to $105 ,249 .50 . We just purchased this lot with these beautiful trees on it . We started to build our new home this summer and are crushed to learn that due to negligence , we are going to lose the trees that helped convince us to live here . We feel compensation for our loss in the amount of $105 ,249 .50 is in order . The house is 50% completed and there are dead limbs hanging over the house . Your urgent funding is requested . Si cerely Yours , E E1 V ED Lrry .7udy Lowenthal 26 Camino Court Lafayette , CA 94549 �,',L. Su, . ( 415 ) 934-4970 ARU Of S PE V; IRS"'e TRA COS A s o. . Deputy Enclosure= report t f`• 3. •4f_ .4 i - .. .. �'+ ix n:-�l r ��• 4t Ms7r.. s� d.+'+">r�?� 5i"It:Mr+'r S „y. 'rZ c 4 z ?s ia�+ „k>,^+ `kt C F Y f Kc .#}. J` : .t'#3sT"e f,-'}''w,.}+i.T§''tfa,•.,x•# as ,.ate•?{ �.♦ � t ey .♦, 1' > s. f 4° rs >.. l• ,�.4 ..� .- i2 r.J. `RC f - ! a'S o y.' h. y:r + .1 I' r:4s .y,. Y a ✓✓�`�2 rkf'x. N'+t`♦ �. �^. 'r; r,.+)w '.- H.� `t.: � t;" ?Y :y 5 •:Y. N i�f i` ..< +'•$ � a,; "f r21 4 7 f?•. + t f. .. .Y•^ X3.4 t• { 1 � ,�. �.' ' �; 3; r • 5 i • �tF ^r .f t.. r -,qt -1 w ✓� i. :',+ frc b�• x+ 1. '7} y,,a n:. fkrt i k.+,t'-�.t f - +;i.. �.- •�.,ad�-r Y+ % ., c 71�.. t dSar lt'S.r.z,k 5.1.:C� r.s -Lii '' 4 + ,•4 fE },.`:i4:,� :! + Quality-Landscape Professional Services 4� +�`4 s zt r i �NS♦ t � 1 5+ -+ �.w � � � y r't �... COi1SUitatlOn NO NONSENSE HORTICULTURAL SERVICES Pat Thompson Certified Horticulturist Certified Arborist#188 Landscape Contractor#535817 Design,Installation, -=4,+n0 Phone Maintenance {415}$28ii$40 NO NONSENSE HORTICULTURAL SERVICES "Quality Landscape & Consultation Services By Professional Horticulturists" 2491 San Ramon Valley Blvd, Suite 1-142. San Ramon. CA 94583 (415) 636-6873 TREE APPRAISAL/EVALUATION INSPECTION DATE: October 2, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: October 6 , 1989 REPORT REQUESTED BY` Judy- Lowei-tlia1 26 Camino Court Lafayette , CA 94549 (Property Owner ) CONSULTING ARBORIST: Patricia Thompson WCTSA Certified Arbor i r;t 11 198 2491 San Ramon Valley Blvd . Suite 111142 San Ramon , CA 94583 CASE LOCATION : 618 Stagecoach Court Lafayette , CA SITE ORIENTATION: This is a lot at the bottom of a natural oak studded canyon . It is being developed as a residence ; construction of the dwelling is in progress . The north property is steep slope with native. vegetation , inclusive of seven native valley oaks (Quercus lobata ) . These are the only- trees on the property . It does not appear that the construction of the dwelling would have affected the oaks , as the dwelling is approximately 40 ' down slope from the lowest tree . The site ' s natural beauty depends heavily on these native trees , as does it ' s value . REPORT/APPRAISAL PURPOSE: This evaluation has been requested by the property owner to appraise damages to the oak trees during construction of a drainage V-ditch , which was constructed approximately 2-3 years ago . The extent of the damages appears at this point to have significantly impacted three of the seven trees . In addition , it is possible that further symptoms of root loss due to the ditch construction may become apparent over the course of up to the next five years in possibly three other trees on the same slope . The damages to these trees should have been . minimal due to the distances of construction from the root area . The goal is to determine , to the most accurate extent possible under these post-construction circumstances , the original state of these trees prior to construction and the . `�„n ryEo ESiF a•t ir�. �".�c'r +s�p,s casualty losses incurred as a direct result of ditch construction activities . SPECIES/GENERAL : This particular species is native to our area and does extremely well under natural , native conditions . It has a very high rating for our area . This species is particularly intolerant to any change in environment , especially those changes associated with any change in grade , excavation that would disturb the root system, and installation of a landscape that would receive summer water . Unless extreme precautionstare taken during construction operations , these trees rarely survive . CONCLUSIONS : Refer to individual field reports and summaries enclosed for specific information on evaluation findings and value appraisals . d � s METHODS OF VALUATION: The value appraisals presented herein have been calculated by the basic formula approved method of establishing values of trees and other plants prepared by The Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers and The International Society of Arboriculture . In this particular case , value factors have been magnified by several factors : 1 ) The property in the past has been an unmanaged oak woodl.ot . Under this classification , the trees would have had a much less significant value . Currently , the property has been .sold for a private residence , placing upon this lot a high monetary value an.d concurrently the location value factor of the trees is greatly inflated . 2) Two of the three trees formally evaluated are the largest trees on the lot and would have added the greatest aesthetic value due to their proximity to the residence . 3) - One of the most significant factors in choosing this lot for the residence was- solely the native oak ..trees on the lot . This is certainly going to affect the quality of life for the owner for some time to come and also impact the resale value of the lot . 4) The evaluated trees have provided a high degree of erosion control on a steep property . This is a difficult loss to assess ; ramifications beyond the values of lost trees may exist in the future should slippage/erosion occur . 5) Native oaks are better acclimated to our native conditions than any other species . They command a 100% species rating . Native oaks have become an issue of preservation ; they provide outstanding beauty , stature , wildlife habitat , longevity and aesthetic appreciation . This species reflect a lifestyle for many and the values of properties with these trees is greatly enhanced . At any price , these trees cannot be realistically replaced . It is a' tragedy that is beyond cost recovery . • 1:k LOGN-luil• • •2 a;Eel fold µ a^x:,•`,t'ti �'. r-ti. * yy..•` •�'• }� 1 ;`n y3a;, x M.0 tT 1s� 1 s+ .1 .fis�y',. ".�t"� S t ^{ � �,� , � • z •.-.� N+ .. F �s :.oi� • '• 4 f� � Y �3 f,. V"r�Y ,. ♦ ^SR�tti�'r.F1�r , �1, pq Mr rt .�+d• �'.6 ����,�. ::1 i ,s ,,x� It �i,i � + i�a > t Yaks rn����' AWW�1 Ow fes' w# a v �k 1• , "�; I "t a }N F j � f2 "�w ,ty 4 POW— NIIr4t f�11r1,y iZ � s, a � � �r r y 1 s sT•x5 ��:�5A�� 7 "L 1�� T�f�rw� y a gy . &� �� syn y1 tj •��1� � 1„1� `!r. 1','' r t + J '� _,f T^^ r-+�r s"� !a •e-d ° k p{ s 1 r � v K ..rn� 1 /,.:�- k /�i 3"��fs r,.,L+. �'' �, � f �r � s �� µ•AY Cro 1 }`tom •� t ,x � � ��i .""jtssr sa4r�ttll' rr ,.*tiP r s,•"pix ��� •�,ycl -7- tr * - a 1 wt� b.. �' A� i x�$ a,�. k��o i�r 1 Y•�� , p�r��ff ',' 7 V i...'::` 1� 't�^ a i t ,.• r;: .+a..l. r����.:q jt 1 s� �.+'{.r �� t �Y`f�t+./� 6 . x a a r. `%e��, t•+L aC w .rx •t a t9`k,:' � 'F`1�r ,r �L�`y '� s't y,,:.r i- 1LIN i.A� '�• { , r"k t ,., �: t� N r �}t . 1 r e� ct M � �.1' X; i Sfi!�Y,�Y"s'�s � / 4 11�7Y � �•1(i.�'^� ASyi s.. J r!t"'oP t4 +i'i7yl1k1A� r >t frt n j t�. • /y� '.�.�v �' ?f c j,b§ I '`''w�„j��.•., �t.. mss+ Xryt.tf w��rf�����iT ;ytr� � k,i}����nY � f. �,,,�. { � !„,,5 4SM 3 4 _ r X A ash� � 'f i J,.� �'���xny�� 4y c•t y-+i'i^7�� �� hY i'2��`�'�f'. >�” t 1 L ,� vn ,r r " >a' ,r '� ";,r �t4�•••rr^;yas+a4 k+jT.w..i 1 r 34 4 ..,2r- Se i tT w r F �•s 'i - r f3. . ✓'•" "'A F Yom+ cam.' •`f N r. t3� iy r „y}d'; t � � #r � r 1 '�', r�:1~'y` ! rrf ,a t, :, w� 4y^t� l a x k�,• k :. ,. 14,r✓ } rtt� ,n i y!- 4p, tw t irk, N ✓q '+ 7 t �f' + r }+ " ! l L `%,a 1 ,r j( fr} ,: .. � �rt�, < ., �S' 1 ��j t ` tf.J�'=�. 4`4�>�� t�r � ! r ttY +"+s � ���'tujr�r }�� �C6. �-. ��j .,,•. 7, � 'F� t ' ` � '� ` u`nr���S:u� _ + � �• ti ��� ,''r �.�Yi 4,,, is :� �` �:t rS " 1 GUIDE FOR JUDGING THE CONDITION OF LANDSCAPE TREES POINTS FACTOR VARIATION IN CONDITION FACTOR POINTS AWARDED CROWN Characteristic of species- well balanced (5) rCE,- T°1J DEVELOPMENT Lacking natural or desired symmetry (3) ^ TQu� Lacking full crown (1) TRUNK CONDITION Sound and solid (5) Section of bark missing: less than 1/4 of circumference (4) - — — 1/4 to 1/2 missing (3) 1/2 or more missing (1) Extensive decay or hollow (0) MAJOR BRANCH No defects (5) STRUCTURE Die back limited - (4) Few structurally important dead or broken branches (3) Several structurally important dead or broken branches (1) TWIG GROWTH RATE Typical for species and age - usually 4-6 inches (5) Less than 1/2 normal.growth rate (3) Growth rate greatly reduced - '� yearly decline (1) 3 FOLIAGE Normal size and color for species (5) Minor deficiency/pollution symptoms (3) Major deficiency/pollution symptoms (1) INSECTS & DISEASES No insects or diseases apparent (5) Few controllable insects or diseases present (3) Severe infestation (1) ROOTS No root problems apparent (5) Minor root problems (3) Severe root problems (1) Total Points Condition Class Formula % for Condition 30 - 35 Excellent 90 - 100% 24 - 29 Good 70 - 89 17 - 23 Fair 50 - 69 11 - 16 Poor 25 - 49 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY TREE SPECIES/# : Quercus lobata/Tree # 1 ( Valley Oak) INSPECTION DATE: October 2 , 1989 DATE OF REPORT: October 6 , 1989 REPORT REQUESTED BY : Judy Lowenthal 26 Camino Court Lafayette , CA 94549 ( Property Owner) CONSULTING ARBORIST: Patricia Thompson WCISA Certified Arborist # 198 2491 . San Ramon Valley Blvd_..- Suite#1142 San Ramon , CA 94583 CASE LOCATION : 618 Stagecoach Court Lafayette , CA This oak is the nearest in proximity to the Dome heing built . For all practical purposes , this tree appears to have been in good health prior to construction trauma . This tree incurred serious wounding during excavation for the V—ditch which is installed approximately five feet from the trunk . All roots were severed completely back to the trunk on the down slope side . In addition , the attempted removal of a major scaffold (which I assume was done for equipment clearance during V—ditch construction ) caused severe mechanical damage to the main trunk , also on the down slope side ( see photos) . A pruning wound this large , even if properly made , could alone cause death of the tree . The tear into the trunk in this case would eventually decay ; the rip cuts at the base of this wound made by .the saw evidently trying to cut the torn limb free add to the wounding over the entire side of this trunk . CONCLUSIONS : This tree constitutes a real hazard to structures and people . Extensive wounding and removal of support and feeding roots has resulted in irreversible damage and ultimately the death of the tree . i MINORi�MEMNON man I MIN iM I In0 1 nomololms�.�' uses a ' 101 101loops a non NJ '0 gal Mi �an 0 ee�Eiii masons a 0011101 moll INN 'e�'eieGmee�e lesson TREE DIAGNOSTIC FIELD SURVEY PF.RFORMEU ----------------- Address: ---------- Phone: _5 ,---- fin- n= -----C -- ?Y_•r F=3---------- Phone: CERfiFIED ARBORIST n DATE(S): -------------- TREE LOCATION LOCAiIINf ADDRESS: mnca --l_T_:_______-- fF ---�--=----------------------- INPECTION REQUESTED 6Y:_./�I[?jL �nrJ����j=7�f1�._______________ INITIAL REASON FOR EVALUATION: What has been observed to be wrong with the tree? Describe any abnorealitles seen with regard to size, color, shape or death of the leaves, twigs, branches, liabs, trunk and roots. GENERAL QUESTIONS: SPECIES: r-4'r'Vr AGE IAPPROD: yr yPs SIZE (APPRn m 3� TRUNK DIAMETER 4.5' AGL: 116" TREE LOCATION: Along street, lawn, park; private residence, comeercial; near body of water, salt or fresh; level ground or slope? Overhead or underground utilities. ` �nv3 -Pt FP.r / t�l'IC nVP,a/ nr ^• riles, 7F CONDITION OF OTHER TREES IN AREA: r/) ?C./,-7A 1 r !,, .;r.f'�r .:� �jal., ri,.:l) _ +�')•� ( .,1)i?rl /l! TRANSPLANTED OR 6TURAL7 CROWDED OR OPEN? ) r;/rn•/R PART OF A GROVE (PRESENTLY IlR PREVIOUStY - IF NEIGHBORING TREES REMOVED, NOW IONG AGO?): r�nA nrp^ HOW LONG HAS THE TREE BEEN EXHIBITING THE PROBLEM? If problem has appeared suddenly, describe the weather conditions occuring just prior to. Describe any other unusual conditions. fli)rr1QwN - �ii,.r"D�.,S 1.00 /. FrFt r IS THE PROBLEM VISIBLI:�ALL OVEk TREE, ON ONLY ONE SIDE, IN THE LOWER OR UPPER BRANCHES? HOW MUCH ANNUAL GROWTH HAVE THE TWIGS MADE IN THE LAST THREE YEARS? " HAS THE GRADE AROUND THE TREE BEEN RAISED OR IOWERED DURING THE PAST 1-10 YEARS? IF SO, WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE AND DETAIL. PROCEDURES TYPE OF FILL USED. Sn,< ar, T3nC,r UrNrCC j �nor� �ow�Jj��nT+VF Sc` -, HAS ANY CONSRUCTION WORK. BEEN DONE NEARBY WITHIN THE PAST 3-5 YEARS-BUILDING, ROAD DRIVE, CURBSTONE, ORA INS ETC. t/-Dr7C N �� m iT-rF�1 C ,.•r 3 Yds G C) c.-.n� WHAT WORK;HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS TREE RECENTLY? HAS IT BEEN PRUNED WITHIN THE LAST 1 YEARS? IF SO, HOW MUCH (W FERTILIZER OR PESTICIDE TREATMENTS -- WHEN, HOW, WHY AND HOW MUCH? v/3 �A41r— n-,.yrs sr.4rrot 7--) 2F..,� ,a1, IF YOUNG TREE, HOW LONG SINCE PLANTING? HOW DEEPLY WAS IT PLANTED? WHAT SIIE? WHAT -TREATMENTS WERE GIVEN DURING THE FIRST YEARS AFTER PLANTING? n/4 SOIL QUESTIONS: SOIL TYPE: el SOIL COVER: Asphalt, cement, pavers, crushed rock, sand, grass, ground cover, weeds, bare soil (if bare sail is it void of any vegetation?); how much open area is around the tree? DEPTH TO SUBSOIL, TO ROCK, SHALE, SANDST01tE ARDPAN? WHAT 1S THE SOIL PH? n o 07/v*,.I t-, 7./ DRAINAGE: DOES MATER STAND ON THE SOIL AFTER A HEAVY RAIN? HAVE ANY ACCOMODATIONS BEEN MADE FOR SOIL DRAINAGE? V f�'a r>> ✓J WHAT HAVE THE IRRIGATION PRACTICES BEEN IN THE PAST? FOLIAGE AND THIO INSPECTION: APPEARANCE OF LEAVES--COLOR, DENSITY, SIZE AND SHAPE' , Z)rFr1cuc7r -70 gCsF:cJ - /.r--AvF; /1/�.f'IJri•i:� `; i: !;. /� L DEFICIENCY OR HERBICIDE INJURY SYMPTOMS: PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASE? t.�svr� c., i res F c7.S ns sa ci/)YFi) f �.�/ S/'Fc S WILTING? el ANNUAL TWIG GROWTH FOR THE LAST 3-5 YEARS: PRESENT: 3 LAST ..YEAR: / PREVIOUS YEAR; APPEARANCE OFBUD DRQ ABNORMAL; COLOR SIIE AND SHAPE: DISCOLORATION OR STREAKING OF SAPWOOD: DROPPING OF TWIGS/BUDS: ROOT INSPECTION: 15 ROOT GIRDLING PRESENT? (EXCAVATION TO 12") LARGE ROOTS NORMAL IN COLOR? ROTTED OR DISCOLORED ROOTS PR.ESEN17 tIF SO, S0MIl SPECIMENS) l` y'7J ./V R ltRr'/1'�' (' rtrr ' •l'r`rrr� 1 ( /:nr� /- ! r,./ ) fi. 'r, 17. _ c:" r !!' r•! 1 r ..� COLOR OF FEEDING ROOTS: ARE ROOT HAIRS ABUNDANT AND WHITE? rion.1f nn,Fp„FU MECHANICAL INJURY--EXPOSED OR CUT ROOTS? ,-9.1 A- /F007) prl.0vF,7:> y0 -Sup/ rr�t .)vr7f /�/7C'/, S '•.,r� � . � -^F ,c GAS OR HERBICIDE INJURY? PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASES? TRUNK INSPECTION: CRACKS? SIZE? EXPOSURE? BARK GROWTH? (;r pnrl� BARK, DAMAGE; LOUSE BARK,? ri`. /tine-' L(. /n 7y)r 7•. CAVITIES: SIZE OF OPENING, CONDITION OF INTERIOR; IF FILLED, DETAILS OF FILLING PROCEDURE, NOW LONG? EXTENT OF DECAY? (x�r v/iU �► /� /�rl�!'r. nc,.c1in c cr na r , r —7F�1,� .1r's,- �•t A/� / /r•/, r (. -+77 r;r... ,� r,. !'."' . r, R,"riI`l/.'n/�r rt 1"n f PARK BLEEDING? HOW EXTENSIVE? ( � SWOLLEN AREAS? DESCRIBE. (SWOLLEN AREAS COMPLETELY AROUND TRUNK INDICATE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL--EXCAVATE AREA) nGnF Ant.l�%�' FUNGI BODIES PRESENT? LUCATION(SI: / C t_1/n F t V C CANKERS? DEAD SUNKEN AREAS? SUNKEN AREAS IN BASAL TRUNK? EVIDENCE OF BORER HOLES, FRASS, OTHER INSECT EVIDENCE; SQUIRREL, BIRD NESTS, TERMITES, 11 ? INJECTION WOUNDS? r� O BARK BENEATH THE SOIL LINE -- DISCOLORED? DESCRIBE EXTENT AND COLOR. (SUBMIT SAMPLES( /FSt-yl Fr-•//)rim ( /i)77/./�.�� BRANCH INSPECTION: AMOUNT OF DEADWOOD/LOCATION IN CROWN: <10 EXCESSIVE PRUNING? PRUNING WOUNDS--FLUS(( CUT? QUALITY? TIME OF YEAR? CALLUSING? RIPS? STUBBING? CRACKS? EXPOSURE? r�anf r71 SFpi/ ^r BRANCH CANKERS? SUNBURN? WEAK OR SPLIT CROTCHES? 7)+� �/I ����►y= ► ��F.�1 'n _�.�,T, ,, S c�r��Tc i� /)icest ,4 _ h. / Mc $;.,,--7' 1 INSECTS OR DISEASES PRF-SENT7 r_.I�Sr.F►/_ r.F.cr;� TS SPIKE WOUNDS? Crz � n ^ v60 TREE SEAL? I'l U CABLING? HON LONG AND HOW EXTENSIVE? CABLE CONDITION? WOUNDING. DECAY? BASAL SUCKERINO ON MAJOR SCAFFOLDS �> ,.,!,t ,.• n-r,� SPECIFIC POSSIBILITIES: DID THE PROBLEM APPEAR: IMMEDIATELY AFTER A THUNDERSTORM7 AFTER CHEMICALS WERE INJECTED INTO THE TRUNK? AFTER SPRAYS WERE APPLIED? AFTER WEED KILLER WERE APPLIED IN THE VICINITY? AFTER TREATING A NEARBY AREA FOR TERMITES? AFTER ANY OTHER CHEMICAL TREATMENT? FIELD INSPECTION SCHEDULES: DATE OF INSPECTION: TIME OF INSPECTION: 3U INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: �j o o T !o 0 0"T c'n r ''' �, '"" r'� 010 DATE OF INSPECTION: TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED a 0 DATE OF INSPECTION: TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: LOCATION CHART POSITION AND OTHER FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING LOCATION VALUES. Plant: C1 L2CCJS 1013 H-rA C iv- I> POSITION—TYPE OF AREA IN WHICH PLANT IS LOCATED Suggested Rating Range: 10.100% Your Rating Arboretum 60.80 Cemetery 60-80 Commercial 60.90 Corporate or School Campus 60.90 Industrial 6_0.90 Malls 60-90 Recreational Areas: ---,--Golf Courses—_ 60-90 Parks &Wild Life Preserves 40.60 Picnic 50.70 Resort 50-70 Zoo 60.90 Residential: Inner City—Urban 30-100 Suburban — -------_-- -----60.100,------ ----�-�---• - Rural 50.100 Streets-Roads: Boulevards & Residential 50.80 City 40.70 Country 20.50 Freeways 30-60 Woods: Managed or Open 20-60 Unmanaged—(dense forest area) 10.30 AESTHETIC,FUNCTIONAL AND SITE FACTORS: Percentage or Check-ofI Aesthetic Factors: Attract Wildlife Bark Branching Habit Flowers—Fragrance Foliage Fruits Functional Factors: Environmental &Climatic Air Purification Erosion Control Filter Dirt & Dust Noise Abatement Prevent Drifting Snow Provide Shade—Cooling Effect Permit Winter Sun Windbreaks (Hedges & Screens) Site Factors—Architectural & Engineering: Accent Buildings Create Vistas Define Space 721V r Frame Views 1/ �- ctc�cc� 7t, aFS1 ')0,c.:cL Light Shield Provide Privacy Safety Barrier Screen Undesirable Views Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic Control Unusual OTHER: Historic, Rare or Unusual Specimen .• '� : g f i x r t r `1 t� � 3 of Y ��� �y,h•� i ::��r }rl '.Stir t h � rz ,tyz f 7T � S t alt! ,,ix x r }fib .r5 q a ; F'�r} ����`9 1.T (Ip ,rt�1 F.� � r t w�"➢ T• k I'''mo > ;3 {� i 7� i`�•! ,,} it F'3 d.w 3 f 3'„Ir it j nNr��y,'.S 1� Yylc. # ,,.1 L;o' 4 44, Fy✓e p ti r �9 Vq f rry k f 1 1 0 A c� _T ~u • ca � m a a � I cn OM1"^ w rr rr 1r 3g.z- /r r rn tr 5 pl t [ .M7 t�. m Y I'+ rn � m v a o Ell 3 i J O y vi nct • • W, rx' � t'zap..'� A �'",�r },*, * �.Y 3:w�n Yi �M".t S �,x F j��� e s? A'Y t4. i }f t i� 3 r e s"�,ky n' °isy 'e,� rdfiadia�.A��yt: °5, 4.�4 �x4gr"•!i 5} ` t ,�i �? 'C�j ptj ii t 3 t °�• Mfg"F` }. 'ff y a srF" �'f Y>i oi� 4, �& ,r3 ��4 `,`� '��..P� i. ; r3*a t.t 3t"�. i � 2►x �+}g'3h '}y��,S,,. nC'`'''�; � s� �.""'"'>t t �� � ^�, s s 4ay�, �^j s a�. ,1°I'rgr a i i t tp+�.?`� � &�st�✓r� aalr` `x1C �t ay ,4 jtt i'' ' �;� ' ' R. r' J ` r i, 'Ai`� ycv '�` t r'y 3 -t^ty •+.} y„,1 '� yry,} yo,*—/ u L t '� �1 "i _t x»S >njca Y 1 F < 1t' yit y. r t fir •## i e v ar (-,4 x� ��+ M Y�t k a+V; t,n; .Zr 7 Y f. m qtr �x "t'�.rM F • � d �" � s, : ������� ► � sy61 n x " ,i?, s sus �+ aYxl r:•, u t y 4waa:k F ",4 ` x shg.4r�'� is.1bL '� r}57 � k � 4 a•tv S}y"'t ni.., �' 4-s a +t, .'cs � vd t at"x f f xt xxr w, y;~; `rpt} .t ., ) rr a3 ski W a t a,t 3 Y ,�c _ •s^c& y'' ;: v, v 4J d>d��*r `` a° +�' 'u'�, a» v Isk r`..R,� » } ,' S x"*fi f ti:rr-• ey a N t t",. Last r��"C e,,h "s 'i3S^k"{ ,� "s " .§_rz'vm�. �` siyasa fir* k kd9 t q xt haat � roc i � � � ny s .erc r�''�r:� 16' A TO Emit tit1a� i F } .kr 4 x _-�nY NEWf..'..,P.r« "' "`"""""• titc: �ry"j�a`.,.,a». . .r.,urn*"tyrsx^,r,,; s T ^ z;,*"x'T, •. '"'"e ntj Wim,b t �+f r k rr;c -se.�+,.,.e'f, . • • -F t�k` r S �� '�`%��x:t Ss x,s M r� ,.'�=,•r ;r� rJr a m ,� ^�y ,.w. .Y `�iAn:"Yy;C ".4,'. GUIDE FOR JUDGING THE CONDITION OF LANDSCAPE TREES POINTS FACTOR VARIATION IN CONDITION FACTOR POINTS AWARDED CROWN Characteristic of species- well balanced (5) PXE- Qac-nor✓ DEVELOPMENT �o�sr Lacking natural or desired symmetry (3) Lacking full crown (1) TRUNK CONDITION Sound and solid (5) Section of bark missing: less than 1/4 of circumference (4) 1/4 to 1/2 missing (3) - - - - - -- - 1/2 or more missing (1) Extensive decay or hollow (0) MAJOR BRANCH No defects (5) STRUCTURE Die back limited (4) Few structurally important dead or . broken branches (3) Several structurally important dead or broken branches (1) TWIG GROWTH RATE Typical for species and age - usually 4-6 inches (5) Less than 1/2 normal growth rate (3) Growth rate greatly reduced - yearly decline (1) FOLIAGE Normal size and color for species (5) Minor deficiency/pollution symptoms (3) Major deficiency/pollution symptoms (1) INSECTS & DISEASES No insects or diseases apparent (5) Few controllable insects or diseases present (3) Severe infestation (1) ROOTS No root problems apparent (5) Minor root problems (3) Severe root problems (1) _ Total Points Condition Class Formula % for Condition 30 - 35 Excellent 90 - 100% 24 - 29 Good 70 - 89 17 - 23 Fair 50 - 69 11 - 16 Poor 25 - 49 R - 1n vary onnr FIELD REPORT SUMMARY TREE SPECIES/# : Quercus lobata/Tree 43 (Valley Oak ) INSPECTION DATE: October 2 , 1989 DATE OF REPORT October 6 , 1989 REPORT REQUESTED BY: Judy Lowenthal 26 Camino Court Lafayette , CA 94549 (Property Owner) CONSULTING ARBORIST: Patricia Thompson WCISA Certified Arborist # 198 -Ramon Valley Blvd . Suite # 1142 . San Ramon , CA 94583 CASE LOCATION : 618 Stagecoach Court Lafayette, CA This oak .is also situated on the slope directly tehl.nd Lho home under construction . The tree is dying and no other cause other than root loss has been identified . It appears that the tree was in fair/good health prior to significant root loss . Major roots were severed at approximately 10 ' down slope from the base of the tree at the grademarks from the ditch excavation . This tree serves as the primary canopy for a secondary oak that has developed as a portion of a shared crown . This secondary oak seems less affected , but will die without the shelter provided by this oak . CONCLUSIONS : This tree presents a moderate hazard (may be a more immediate hazard dependent on structure details) and should be removed . not ON N sun 1 0 n mom NUNN MONNIMME was on mono now so MEN NONE 1010 0 ��p� i� iiia mmMMoMmMmoMoMMsE eai. el. elC,' al ''mononcom mO E!!9 TREE-DIAGNOSTIC-FIELD-SURVEY PERFORMED BYs__ i4T%�IC��____czC___ Q +P__S_9!�__________ Address: qq 4! S�'� E�r_0.�_l/� _ ��L?_�y� Phone: . CS(LS�__$�.8_1rFr_73 CERTIFIED ARBORIST i �c TREE LOCATION ADDRESS:__�L_8____ T_,aCl:Qne2c !_ ____________ -------------------- 1NPECTIDN REQUESTED BYs p✓ ____oCGtN_TT_i_!_,�JL_____________ INITIAL REASON FOR EVALUATION: Mat has been observed to be wrong with the tree? Describe any abnorialities seen with regard to site, color, shape or death of the leaves, twigs, branches, liabs, trunk and roots. GENERAL QUESTIONS: SPECIM (?U?? zCvS .XOi3,qTA �y 3 AGE (APPROXI: 3 O SIZE (APPROX): TRUNK DIAMETER 4.5' AGL: ,,Pa?/' TREE LOCATION: Along street, lawn, park; private residence, coesercial; near body of water, salt or fresh; level ground or slope? Overhead or underground utilities. S.4c-,PF_ O U e.-2L, ook//)(s f-/?/V 7 E o'z E-S/0 PiVC CONDITION OF OTHER TREES IN AREAS /v/a7ri/1/aL, C��n/srtirzE3c`i> � Cc�ca/) 7a F'i9/2 ConD�no�J TRANSPLANTED NATURAL? CROWDED OR OPEN? Open C,/l Gt/ PART OF A GROVE (PRESENTLY OR PREVIOUSLY -- IF NEIGHBORING TREES REMOVED, HOW LONG AGO?). Un KrnowN HOW LONG HAS THE TREE BEEN EXHIBITING THE PROBLEM? If problem has appeared suddenly, describe the weather conditions occuring just prior to. Describe any, other unusual conditions. ` ,<o ox_- a CX 2 e C&J 1S THE PROBLEM VISIBLE IE TREE, ON ONLY ONE SIDE, IN THE LOWER OR UPPER BRANCHES? HOW MUCH ANNUAL GROWTH HAVE THE TWIGS MADE 1N THE LAST THREE YEARS? a HAS THE GRADE AROUND THE IREE BEEN RAISED OR LOWERED DURING THE PAST 1-10 YEARS? IF SO, WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE AND DETAIL PROCEDURES, TYPE OF FILL USED. /)CCU,-UC/r-rL'D i1jA-nv8 Solt - V1:7N/t ( S,DE g 815 r7197v2A L HAS ANY CONSRUC110N WORK, BEEN DONE NEARBY WITHIN THE PAST 3-5 YEARS-BUILDING, ROAD DRIVE, CURBSTONE, DRAINS ETC. V_ Di7C./( EF)eC'AV/ -reZ $ insr.4( CF17' FiroM �- 3 yE�s fiGO . WHAT WORK HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS TREE RECENTLY? HAS IT BEEN PRUNED WITHIN THE LAST 1 YEARS? 1F SO, HOW MUCH (X)? FERTILIZER OR PESTICIDE TREATMENTS -- WHEN, HOW, WHY AND HOW MUCH? IF YOUNG TREE, HOW LONG SINCE PLANTING? HOW DEEPLY WAS IT PLANTED? WHAT SIZE? WHAT TREATMENTS WERE GIVEN DURING THE FIRST YEARS AFTER PLANTING? SOIL QUESTIONS: SOIL TYPE:, S'-4�'nAy, C4A .CGAM SOIL COVER: Asphalt, cement, pavers, crushed rock, sand, grass, ground cover, weeds, bare soil (if bare soil is it void of any vegetation?)) how such open area is around the tree? Ca/zA S S F S cr_�10 C.v 6.6 DEPTH TO SUBSOIL, 10 ROCK, SHALE, SANDSTONE, HARDPAN? WHAT IS THE SOIL PH? 7, DRAINAGE: DOES WATER STAND ON THE SOIL AFTER A HEAVY RAIN? HAVE ANY ACCOMODATIONS BEEN MADE FOR SOIL DRAINAGE? v el-ay <3 QED WHAT HAVE THE-IRRIGATION-PRACTICES BEEN IN THE PAST? hon E FOLIAGE AND TWIG INSPECTION: APPEARANCE OF LEAVES--COLOR, DENSITY, SIZE AND SHAPE: Srr+�acc , S-rvNTL° /a v82y S/'A�S � — VE-.Qy FEW C5 A3 FxIre -s U E Z) EE 3,,qc/c- DEFICIENCY OR HERBICIDE INJURY SYMPTOMS: hon F 03S(f2 V E/) PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASE? C4 5UA-L /nSF`G?S �. 's WILTING? no7' p/3sz-2 u'e ANNUAL TWIG GROWTH FOR TILE LAST 3-5 YEARS: " ',• •' PRESENT: LAST YEAR: PREVIOUS YEARN APPEARANCE OF BUDS; NORMALIABNORMAL; COLOR SIIE AND SHAPE: Soo AAs E, pay, DISCOLORATION OR STREAKING OF SAPWOOD: r�o7- 0 3 s&¢ u cA DROPPING OF Ta1GS/BUDS: 7 ROOT INSPECTION: 19 ROOT GIRDLING PRESENT? (EXCAVATION 1O 175) YIOn� 13's z 7) LARGE ROOTS NORMAL IN COLOR? ROTTED OR DISCOLORED ROOTS PRESENT? [IF SO, SUBMIT SPECIMENS) i )04rnAL /u&42 rla0T CAW w'J COLOR OF FEEDING ROOTS: ARE ROOT HAIRS ABUNDANT AND WHITE? S&ui/J�D -bOwrl&ILC S/D� MECHANICAL INJURY--EXPOSED OR CUT ROOTS? \l� s Cp�TG� (Ic.7 #V C' GAS OR HERBICIDE INJURY? no jeo/3-SE2uE PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASES? ho Ie nl3..SC.2UcJ TRUNK INSPECTION: CRACKS? SIZE? EXPOSURE? hG BARK GROWTH? 000 o2 BARK DAMAGE; LOOSE BARK? none siG� i17 CAVITIES: SIZE OF OPENING, CONDITION OF INTERIOR; IF FILLED, DETAILS OF FILLING PROCEDURE, HOW LONG? EXTENT OF DECAY? r)on'C'> Si6r► ��/ci`Y�7 BARK BLEEDING? HOW EXTENSIVE? O/3 SE a u F SWOLLEN AREAS? DESCRIBE. (SWOLLEN AREAS COMPLETELY AROUND TRUNK INDICATE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL--EXCAVATE AREA) bone 013S8P_ L/ 7� FUNGI BODIES PRESENT? LOCATION(S): t r,0 1 013sC�,ZuF7� CANKERS? DEAD SUNKEN AREAS? SUNKEN AREAS IN BASAL TRUNK? i�ohe �33E/;� uF7) EVIDENCE OF BORER HOLES, FRASS, OTHER INSECT EVIDENCE; SQUIRREL, BIRD' NESTS, TERMITES, ANTS? nom e (D 13S u(F INJECTION WOUNDS? r-)O BARK BENEATH. THE SOIL LINE, -- DISCOLORED? DESCRIBE EXTENT AND COLOR, ISUBMIT SAMPLES) BRANCH INSPECTION: AMOUNT OF DEADNOOD/LOCATION IN CROWN: EXCESSIVE PRUNING? PRUNING WOUNDS--FLUSH CUT? QUALITY? TIME OF YEAR? CALLUSING? RIPS? STUDDING? CRACKS? EXPOSURE? ha BRANCH CANKERS? SUNBURN? nV WEAK, OR SPLIT CROTCHES? � 0 INSECTS OR DISEASES PRESENT? (4'sC) SS oC. 97- Z-) P r F S SPIKE ROUNDS? / nG TREE SEAL? CABLING? NOW LONG AND HOW EXTENSIVE? CABLE CONDITION? WOUNDING. DECAY? r BASAL SUCKERINO ON MAJOR SCAFFOLDS? dQAT SPECIFIC POSSIBILITIES: DID THE PROBLEM APPEAR: IMMEDIATELY AFTER A THUNDERSTORM? AFTER CHEMICALS WERE INJECTED INTO IHE TRUNK? AFTER SPRAYS WERE APPLIED? AFTER WEED KILLER WERE APPLIED IN THE VICINITY7 AFTER TREATING A NEARBY AREA FOR TERMITES? AFTER ANY OTHER CHEMICAL TREAIMENT? FIELD INSPECTION SCHEDULES: .DATE OF INSPECTION: ole g TIME OF INSPECTION: 3; Qo- INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: mrd? -zoo-r C,po .ti C` 0 cAu11T10'n S,c'PC 77 ;Z)oCG►A-./ DATE OF INSPECTION: TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED DATE OF 1NSPECTIONt TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: c LOCATION CHART POSITION AND OTHER FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING LOCATION VALUES Plant: �# 3> c� e.2c v s POSITION—TYPE OF AREA IN WHICH PLANT IS LOCATED Suggested Rating Range: 10.100% Your Rating Arboretum 60.80 Cemetery 6080 Commercial 60.90 Corporate or School Campus 60.90 Industrial 60-90 _ Malls 60-90 Recreational Areas: _Golf Courses 60-90 Parks & Wild Life Preserves 40.60 Picnic 50.70 Resort 50.70 Zoo 60-90 Residential: Inner City—Urban 30.100 Suburban 60.100 Rural 50.100 Streets-Roads: Boulevards & Residential 5080 City 40.70 Country 20.50 Freeways 3060 Woods: Managed or Open 20-60 Unmanaged—(dense forest area) 10.30 AESTHETIC,FUNCTIONAL AND SITE FACTORS: Percentage or Check-oft Aesthetic Factors: Attract Wildlife Bark Branching Habit Flowers—, Fragrance Foliage Fruits Functional Factors: Environmental &Climatic Air Purification Erosion Control t Filter Dirt & Dust Noise Abatement Prevent Drifting Snow Provide Shade—Cooling Effect Permit Winter Sun Windbreaks(Hedges & Screens) Site Factors—Architectural & Engineering: / Accent Buildings Create Vistas ,/f Define Space r Frame Views r Light Shield Provide Privacy Safety Barrier Screen Undesirable Views Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic Control Unusual OTHER: Historic, Rare or Unusual Specimen D) a . CD m � CD � 1 O 1{14} v C m � a A H 3 C3. tt] ' r � m N � G N (D n � r J►� c fl _ CD � � N 0 z -n 00 0a N W n o � o F M 10 C r 0 9J '� Q o 0 O w tQ ' a � . rJ 3 -.0 O n m O Q � n Dt N ,l.',............... _...w AM to];W-11 9 1 IMOR m:1 MB LOT" ..'Art, . IF VP4 fail" �CQC .B � � d 6 � GUIDE FOR JUDGING THE CONDITION OF LANDSCAPE TREES POINTS FACTOR VARIATION IN CONDITION FACTOR POINTS AWARDED CROWN Characteristic of species- well balanced (5) ,.2e r����,on/ DEVELOPMENT lacking natural or desired symmetry (3) cC,^' Lacking full crown (1) TRUNK CONDITION Sound and solid (5) Section of bark missing: less than 114 of circumference (4) 114 to 1/2 missing (3) 112 or more missing (1) Extensive decay or hollow (0) MAJOR BRANCH No defects (5) STRUCTURE Die back limited (4) Few structurally important dead or broken branches (3) Several structurally important dead or broken branches (1) TWIG GROWTH RATE Typical for species and age - usually 4-6 inches (5) Less than 112 normal growth rate (3) Growth rate greatly reduced - yearly decline (1) FOLIAGE` Normal size and color for species (5) Minor deficiency/pollution symptoms (3) Major deficiency/pollution symptoms (1) INSECTS & DISEASES No insects or.diseases apparent (5) Few controllable insects or diseases present (3) Severe infestation ROOTS No root problems apparent (5) Minor root problems (3) Severe root problems (1) Total Points Condition Class Formula % for Condition 30 - 35 Excellent 90 - 100% 24 - 29 Good 70 - 89 17 - 23 Fair 50 - 69 11 - 16 Poor 25 - 49 A _ In vim... D.,.,. n ')A FIELD REPORT SUMMARY TREE SPECIES/# : Quercus lobata/Tree #4 (Valley Oak) INSPECTION DATE: October 2 , 1989 DATE OF REPORT: October 6 , 1989 REPORT REQUESTED BY: Judy Lowenthal 26 Camino Court Lafayette , CA 94549 (Property Owner ) CONSULTING ARBORIST: Patricia Thompson WCISA Certified Arborist # 198 2491 San Ramon Valley Blvd . Suite # 1142 . San Ramon , CA 94583 CASE LOCATION : 618 Stagecoach Court Lafayette , CA Oak' #4 is situated in close proximity to conk #3 . Tt hnn developed as a portion of , and is technically a secondary part of oak #3 . For evaluation purposes , it has been treated as a separate entity. This tree is integral in balancing out the west side of it ' s neighbor ' s crown . Either tree would be unbalanced without the other and oak #4 would not survive if the adjacent tree were removed , nor would it have aesthetic value . In addition to shared canopy and structure , these trees in all likelihood also share a common grafted root system . Valuation would be relatively the same if the trunk diameter was added to the diameter of oak #3 . •on of a shared crown . This secondary tree seems much less affected , but will die without the shelter provided by this oak ( see Tree 1'4.) . There was evidence of root severance approximately 15' from trunk on the downhill side.: CONCLUSIONS : This tree is not considered an immediate hazard but should be removed simultaneously with oak #3 . --------------- MOONS so NONE OEM MENNENno 0 MEN I MEN I all 11 ills IN a a BONN 00 OMNI, !!HRnommoomI mosommi ON a assams 01.10.1 an 0 NUNN 0 0 was �ememeaa��o on a ON Boni 0 s MON ' mom ' �mom � eO�= c � �9 r em � � i5 mom TREE_DIAGNOSTIC_FIELD_SURVEY --� PERFORMED BYt_ t,Tl_2LLJf_-----as!____1_CCC?_'?P__S_4_! _________ Address: ��l_91____ .�__�1_ Q�_1✓ �S!C?_�s�.V_�F_f'/�� Phone: . CSII��_8 _ .�2 CERTIFIED ARBORIST OATE4Sl:__1 ? -_ ---------- TREE 1---------TREE LOCATION ADDRESS:__E,l1____ T��F _________ F ay�c77 T-- ------------------- 1NPECTION REQUESTED 6Y:_ u ___.a_ Fti7 Z7Y�9_L�,.__________ INITIAL REASON FOR EVALUATION: What has been observed to be wrong with the tree? Describe any abnorsalities seen with' regard to size, color, shape or death of the leaves, twigs, branches, liebs, trunk and roots. GENERAL QUESTIONS: SPECIES: C?upitCU.S AocrrA W AGE !APPROXI: 3 Ci SIZE (APPROXI: R5-- 3o TRUNK DIAMETER 4.5' AGI( aC.) TREE LOCATION: Along street, lawn, park; private residence, c000ercial; near body of water, salt or fresh; level ground or slope? Overhead or underground utilities. CONDITION OF OTHER TREES IN AREA: NnTU��.�� Urz1��s7i�2¢Ev� GooL -m -T- noN TRANSPLANTED OR NATURAL? CROWDED OR OPEN? PART OF A GROVE iPRESr-NTLY OR PREVIOUSLY -- IF NEIGHBORING TREES REMOVED, HOW LONG AGO?): 7vi.S T/zF E A109-3 0,-UF40er=D /9S A cA•�G�/ U�,�c�ocv.--� 70tzTionl of -r,z,F 3• HOW LONG HAS THE TREE BEEN EXHIBITING THE PROBLEM? If problem has appeared suddenly, describe the weather conditions occuring just prior to. Describe any other unusual conditions. Ui7K�:cwev SY- "1*7-r0rn S tea"F.42 ;;r� /2 C/ e2 jz IS THE PROBLEM VISIBL LL OVER T E TREE, ON ONLY ONE SIDE, IN THE LUWER OR UPPER BRANCHES? HOW MUCH ANNUAL- GROWTH HAVE THE TWIGS MADE IN THE LAST THREE YEARS? 3 HAS THE GRADE AROUND THE TREE BEEN RAISED OR LOWERED DURING THE PAST 7-10 YEARS? IF 50, WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE AND DETAIL PROCEDURES, TYPE OF FILL USED. %9 CCUr1U.4AT6 D AlA)T/Uc So/L o,,n /. U/-1 S off /9p2 /- 0X P E l=/0 — ,g /'e/a Ia S 7.0 -4 E- S E D/rn 1✓c1 Ti9 T/CKJ HAS ANY CONSRUCTION WORK BEEN DONE NEARBY WITHIN THE PAST 3-5 YEARS-BUILDING, ROAD DRIVE, CURBSTONE, DRAINS ETC. y_Dr-rc ll -.3 yds A c,o� F,r CAVA7l_D ,Q. o-2oy a0' F-.-2 o••n -r C,/'✓/C WHAT WORK HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS TREE RECENTLY? HAS IT BEEN PRUNED WITHIN THE LAST 1 YEARS? IF SO, HOW MUCH M? FERTILIZER OR PESTICIDE TREATMENTS -- WHEN, HOW, WHY AND HOW MUCH? non E IF YOUNG TREE, HOW LONG SINCE PLANTING? HOW DEEPLY WAS 11 PLANTED? WHAT SIZE? WHAT TREATMENTS WERE GIVEN DURING THE FIRST YEARS AFTER PLANTING? SOIL QUESTIONS: SOIL TYPE: S�Ay .CGr9M SOIL COVER: Asphalt, cement, pavers, crushed rock, sand, grass, ground cover, weeds, bare soil (if bare soil is it void of any vegetation?); how such open area is around the tree? /V ATl U VAt Chi RAS 3F� (iYI C c,U F�j� LARGE ROOTS NORMAL IN COLOR? ROTTED OR DISCOLORED ROOTS PRESENT? IIF SO, SUBMIT SPECIMENS) . n ofz COLOR OF FEEDING ROOTS: ARE ROOT HAIRS ABUNDANT AND WHITE? Cc).co2 60CD _,--Ar? r9OUivA/1Tr MECHANICAL INJURY--EXPOSED OR CUT ROOTS? r 3 SFue/z@a 2oOTS -4 ire D/.9.y.Fr& GAS OR HERBICIDE-INJURY? n O' PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASES? r�O TRUNK INSPECTION: CRACKS? SIZE? EXPOSURE? rlo n e BARK GROWTH? F-ry BARK DAMAGE) LOOSE BARK? �O CAVITIES: SIIE OF OPENING, CONDITION OF INTERIOR; 1F FILLED, DETAILS OF FILLING PROCEDURE, HOW LONG? EXTENT OF DECAY? h O!n E S/6 o w&-o- BARK 2BARK BLEEDING? HOW EXTENSIVE? hG X1 r7 6 SWOLLEN AREAS? DESCRIBE. (SWOLLEN AREAS COMPLETELY AROUND TRUNK INDICATE POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL--EXCAVATE AREA) �b FUNGI BODIES PRESENT? LOCATIONISI: 0 0 S E'Q VEA CANKERS? DEAD SUNKEN AREAS? SUNKEN AREAS IN BASAL TRUNK? EVIDENCE OF BORER HOLES, FRASS, OTHER INSECT EVIDENCE; SAUIRREL, BIRD NESTS, TERMITES, ANTS? .41Gn6 0C3SER.u6 (� DEPTH TO SUBSOIL, TO ROCK, SHALE, SANDSTONE, HARDPAN? WHAT IS THE SOIL PH? 7,D .. DRAINAGE: DOES WATER STAND ON THE SOIL AFTER A HEAVY RAIN? HAVE ANY ACCOMODATIONS BEEN MADE FOR SOIL ;. DRAINAGE? ✓ '/ Gooh WHAT HAVE THE'IRRIGATION PRACTICES BEEN IN THE PAST? no IE FOLIAGE AND TWIG INSPECTION: APPEARANCE OF LEAVES--COLOR, DENSITY, SIZE AND SHAPE: 11}ve2.4-6 F_ DEFICIENCY OR HERBICIDE INJURY SYMPTOMS: r:anF 0QSF/1(/PZ) PRESENCE OF INSECTS/DISEASE? usuoc. ins F.r-rs .grsoCoer76d WILTING? 017 a's 3 F`/z v 6 ANNUAL TWIO GROWTH FOR THE LAST 3-5 YEARS: PRESENT:3-v" LAST YEAR: PREVIOUS YEAR: -/// „. APPEARANCE OF BUDS; NORMALIABNORMAL; COLOR SIIE AND SHAPE: SPS 2:s a. DISCOLORATION.OR STREAKING OF SAPWOOD: 0SIe-2LlEl DROPPING OF TWIGSIBUDS: r+� Irl i r"/14 L ROOT INSPECTION: 19 ROOT GIRDLING PRESENT? (EXCAVATION TO 111) INJECTION WOUNDS? n0 BARK BENEATH THE SOIL LINE -- DISCOLORED? DESCRIBE EXTENT AND COLOR. !SUBMIT SAMPLES) BRANCH INSPECT10Ni AMOUNT OF DEADWOOD/LOCATION IN CROWN: C'Rcw.v 0/.-1s I)F V E.AopF Zj f,s u riAv 0 LV/TN 7'ZFF - ,�¢`3 (AD7�cG'NT �'/' /S C?�F - ��OFL� R voC�C G> '107- ` 02. /`/.4vE AcsS7giE77C 1/�� (JC, 1N/�Ft�.U77`/ EXCESSIVE PRUNING? PRUNING WOUNDS--FLUSH CUT? QUALITY? TIME OF YEAR? CALLUSING? RIPS? STUBBING? .�Un�C r+OT qC,-e V/ CRACKS? EXPOSURE? /-) O BRANCH CANKERS? SUNBURN? .� o WEAK. OR SPLIT CROTCHES? b C`2 0 Lo L� a F S V S 7-6 GT —T O `,T2lz S S/ 2 EJv•C G CF �'� AdTA(fv�1T TSF E le.F.nav� INSECTS OR DISEASES PRESENT? 4Sv�►C ASroc16-7-F 2) cu/ SPFc SPIKE WOUNDS? na TREE SEAL? ; nU CABLING? NOW LONG AND HON EXTENSIVE? CABLE CONDITION? WOUNDING. DECAY? �►G BASAL SUCKERING ON MAJOR SCAFFOLDS? j'1 G SPECIFIC POSSIBILITIES: DID THE PROBLEM APPEAR: IMMEDIATELY AFTER A THUNDERSTORM? AFTER CHEMICALS WERE INJECTED INTO THE TRUNK? AFTER SPRAYS WERE APPLIED? AFTER WEED KILLER WERE APPLIED IN 111E VICINITY? AFTER TREATING A NEARBY AREA FOR TERMITES? AFTER ANY OTHER CHEMICAL TREATMENT? FIELD INSPECTION SCHEDULES: DATE OF INSPECTION: l o/.D/S S TIME OF INSPECTION, INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: /?oo-T� X007 C�townJ v,sof+j- c' ovy f�a (3,"Zcl FXCvAT/Oen INSCEC'7=GA-) JJOCU EA.)7A)-rlO// DATE OF INSPECTION: TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED DATE OF INSPECTIONt TIME OF INSPECTION: INSPECTIONS PERFORMED: LOCATION CHART POSITION AND OTHER FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING LOCATION VALUES Plant: POSITION--TYPE OF AREA IN WHICH PLANT IS LOCATED Suggested Rating Range: 10.100% Your Rating Arboretum 60-80 Cemetery 60.80 Commercial 60.90 Corporate or School Campus 60-90 Industrial ;60.90 Malls 60.90 Recreational Areas: Golf Courses __._________—___ _ 60.90 Parks & Wild Life Preserves 40-60 Picnic 50-70 Resort 50.70 Zoo 60-90 Residential: Inner City—Urban 30.100 Suburban 60.100 r Rural 50.100 Streets-Roads: Boulevards & Residential 50.80 City 40.70 Country 20.50 Freeways 30-60 Woods: Managed or Open 20.60 Unmanaged—(dense forest area) 10.30 AESTHETIC,FUNCTIONAL AND SITE FACTORS: Percentage or Check-off Aesthetic Factors: Attract Wildlife Bark Branching Habit Flowers—Fragrance Foliage Fruits Functional Factors: Environmental &Climatic Air Purification Erosion Control Filter Dirt & Dust Noise Abatement Prevent Drifting Snow Provide Shade—Cooling Effect Permit Winter Sun Windbreaks (Hedges & Screens) Site Factors—Architectural & Engineering: Accent Buildings Create Vistas / Define Space Frame Views Light Shield Provide Privacy Safety Barrier Screen Undesirable Views Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic Control Unusual OTHER: Historic, Rare or Unusual Specimen �F � O � m CD m O D Cf CD m V N CD c9 CD m O N N p� m G c m D O � m 4z m —� N �q CD n m 0 m m � D p cnID r N � o z Fn n r n a > _ o a i C/) CD a 0 � o = M CD aC r _ m r 0 � o o 0 v m v ; d � o om — cn N (O/1 C IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proclaiming ) 1990 as Contra Costa County ) Resolution No. : 90/16 Employee Safety Belt Year ) WHEREAS every year over 43,000 people are killed in automobile crashes and the costs of collisions exceeds $57 billion annually; and WHEREAS motor vehicle crashes are the number one cause of on-the-job fatalities ; and WHEREAS motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death and permanently disabling injuries for individuals under the age of 44 ; and WHEREAS less than 50% of Californians regularly wear safety belts; and WHEREAS the National Highway Traffic Safety Commssion has set a .goal of increasing safety belt use to 70% by the end of 1990; and WHEREAS research shows that the proper use of lap and shoulder safety belts can reduce the risk of serious injury and death by at least 57%, and that the proper use of child passenger safety belts can reduce the risk of death to children by 71%; and WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors is concerned about the personal safety of the employees of Contra Costa County whether they travel in public or private automobiles. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, California hereby PROCLAIMS 1990 as "Contra Costa County Employee Buckle-Up Year" and ENCOURAGES all Contra Costa County employees to buckle-up whenever they are in a vehicle , to insist that their passengers buckle-up, and to safely secure their infants and young children in approved child passenger safety seats . Passed and adopted on January 9, 1990, by unanimous vote of the Board members present . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution entered in the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this, ninth day of January, 1990. Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator. By ° Deputy Clerk Introduced by: Supervisorncy C . Fanden Distr ' ct II