HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01161990 - T.7 T.7
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on January 16, 1990 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson and Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Hearing On Appeal By Vincent McClun On Minor Subdivision
106--88 In The Alamo Area.
This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors for hearing on the appeal by Vincent McClun (appellant)
from the decision of the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission
serving as the Board of Appeals sustaining the decision of the Zoning
Administrator on the request by Vincent McClun (applicant) and Paul
and Loretta Wilhelmsen (owners) for a minor subdivision (MS 106-88) to
divide ' l . 5 acres into two parcels with a subsequent request for an
exemption from the "collect and convey" drainage requirements in the
Alamo area.
Karl Wandry, Community Development Department, presented the
staff report on the matter before the Board. He presented a brief
history of the appeal before the Board describing the proposed project
site. He commented that the issue was not the subdivision itself but
rather the collect and convey requirement.
Supervisor Schroder requested clarification of the drainage
requirements.
Milt Kubicek, Flood Control, responded to Supervisor Schroder' s
question.. .
The public hearing was opened and the following persons appeared
to speak:
Vince D'Alo, Aliquot Associates, representing the applicant,
requested consideration of the appeal and presented a brief history of
the matter.
Scott Finn, 315 Diablo Road #100, Danville, representing Finn
Development, spoke in favor of proposed drainage.
The public hearing was closed.
Milt Kubicek expressed concern in terms of an exception to the
collect and convey requirements because it is. used Countywide to
require that adequate drainage infrastructure be installed as a part
hof the development process. He commented on problems involved if
rainage is not required as a part of the development process.
Supervisor Schroder expressed agreement with Mr. Kubicek relative
to the County policy, but expressed concern about the prohibitive cost
of improvements and advised he would like to defer the decision to
confer with Mr. Kubicek on the drainage, work out something that is
not punitive, and he moved to defer the decision on this matter for
two weeks.
The Board discussed the issues relative to the collect and convey
requirement.
Supervisor Torlakson commented on the drainage problems in East
County.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the decision on the above appeal
is DEFERRED to January 30, 1990 on the Determination calendar.
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Su nâșisonl on the date shown.
ATTESTED
Orig. Dept. : Clerk of the Board PHIL TCHELOR,qqrkoftheBoard
cc: Community Development Supervi rsandCo tyAdministrator
Public Works-Flood Control 00o
Vincent McClun By ,Deouty
Paul and Loretta Wilhelmsen