HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02131990 - 1.13 TOBOARD OF SUPERVISORS 13
FROM; Victor J. Westman, County Counsel GlJl ltra
By: Lillian T. Fujii , Deputy County Counsel Cx)sta
DATE: February 8, 1990 COJ "7
SUBJECT; Settlement of Outman v. Board of Supervisors, et al .
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION: Approve settlement in Outman v. Board of
Supervisors, et al. , Superior Court No. C 89-03575, and authorize
the Chairperson or the County Counsel to execute the settlement
agreement on behalf of the County.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. The settlement agreement provides that
all parties will pay for their own costs and attorney' s fees .
BACKGROUND:
This suit challenged the Board's October 1, 1989 approval of
Subdivision 7099, a six lot subdivision in the Alamo area. As
part of the project, Thayer & Holt, the developer, had agreed to
perform substantial drainage improvements in the Miranda Creek
area.
The settlement primarily involves Thayer and Holt agreeing
to 1) height restrictions on two houses, 2) additional
landscaping requirements, and 3) paying $6,000 to the
petitioners. The settlement does not involve any other changes
to the conditions of approval imposed by the Board.
This office recommends approval of the settlement agreement.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMI 81EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE S 1: Irl
ACTION OF BOARD ON r LD IJ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED elf OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT; ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Counsel ATTESTED FEB I 11900
\ Community Development PHIL BATCHELOR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Public Works SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY DEPUTY
M382/7-83