HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10101989 - 1.39 ®39
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON, Costa
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C int
DATE: OCtoberJ.0,r', 1989
SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION-Minor Subdivision 85-85, Charles R.
Bradbury (Applicant/Owner) , requesting to divide a one-acre
parcel into two lots, to have variances to lot width and
setbacks. Reconsideration requested by Campbell S. O'Neill
an' adjacent property owner-Walnut Creek area (S.D. III)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Deny the request for reconsideration.
BACKGROUND
Minor Subdivision 85-85 was denied without prejudice by the Zoning
Administrator on December 8 , 1986. The applicant appealed the
decision to the County Planning Commission. The Planning
Commission granted the appeal thereby approving the minor
subdivision on May 26 , 1987 .
The County Planning Commission' s decision was appealed by an
adjacent property owner, R. Charles Husted, Jr. The. Board held a
hearing on the appeal on October 6 , 1987 and deferred a decision on
the matter to the October 13 , 1987 determination calendar. On
October 13 , _1987 the Board upheld the County Planning Commission' s
decision.
Mr. O'Neill' s request for reconsideration is based primarily on the
status of the access easement and the variances that were granted.
Mr. O'Neill contends that the access easement will require the
granting of an easement over his property which he does not favor.
The Tentative Map and the Conditions of Approval address the access
issue. The map shows an onsite access to =parcel A, the rear
parcel. Parcel B fronts on Winfield Lane. Condition of Approval
4.C. requires the applicant to furnish proof of legal access to the
property from Tice Valley Boulevard. The issue of variances was
reviewed and sustained by both the County Planning Commission and
the Board during the two appeals of this project.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATI OF BOARD COMMI E
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON October 10 , 1989 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. .
cc: Community Development (Orig. ) ATTESTED October 10,. 1989
County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
Public Works-Tom DudziakE BO RD OF SUPERVISORS-
Thiessen, Gagen & McCoy D CO Y ADMINISTRATOR
BY , DEPUTY
L2 :MS85-85 .bo
HEB/GA/df