HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01101989 - IO.4 1
'vu BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I . 0. 4
FROM: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE COrltra
January 9, 1989
Costa
DATE*. C0^
0 1/tiF�/
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON HATE VIOLENCE PROJECT VV�.11 �l�
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND Alm JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . Approve the attached concept paper for purposes of
submitting an application to the San Francisco Foundation in
the amount of $70,000 to design and put in place a mechanism
for providing a coordinated response to instances of hate
violence, and authorize the Chairman to execute the
application.
2 . Refer this concept paper to the 1989 Finance Committee for
purposes of identifying the source of the remaining $27, 500
in matching funds which will be required from the County
during the 1989-90 fiscal year with the understanding that
this is a one-time funding request which will not be
required after June 30 , 1990, and that if such matching
funds cannot be made available, the Board of Supervisors
will have to refuse to accept the grant award, if approved .
by the San Francisco Foundation.
3 . Remove this item as a referral to our Committee.
BACKGROUND:
On October 18, 1988 , the Board of Supervisors approved a status
report from our Committee on the Hate Violence Project and asked
the Executive Director of the Human Relations Commission to
provide our Committee with a further status report on January 9 ,
1989 .
On January 9, 1989, our Committee reviewed the attached paper
with Mr. Persily and George Fujioka, a member of the Human
Relations Commission. It is the recommendation of the Human
Relations Commission that the Board of Supervisors approve this
paper as the basis for an application to the San Francisco
Foundation for a $70, 000 grant. It is proposed that the grant be
matched with $35,000 in County funds for the period January 1,
1989--June 30, 1990 . However, because it is now so late in the
1988-89 fiscal year, the Human Relations Commission has agreed to
make available $7500 in their current funding to cover the match
cost through the end of this fiscal year, with the County to
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
X APPROV OTHER -------:1
Z�
o� lone
SIGNATUREISI: Sunne 1.4. McPeak Tom Torlakson
ACTION OF BOARD ON January 10, 1989 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED
Sondra Rothwell , CAO' s Office
Exec. Director, HRC P IL BATCHELO , CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
San Francisco Foundation (via Fred Persily, HRC) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY �� ,DEPUTY
M382/7-83
Page 2
provide $27, 500 in funding as a part of the 1989-90 County
Budget. While we believe that the establishment of a coordinated
method for the community to investigate and deal with reports of
hate violence is an essential component of our human relations
activities in this County, we also recognize that coming up with
the necessary County matching funds may be very difficult given
the prospects for funding in the 1989-90 County Budget.
We are, therefore, recommending that the Board of Supervisors
approve the concept in principle, authorize the submission of an
application to the San Francisco Foundation in order that their
review process can be undertaken at the earliest possible moment,
and that the 1989 Finance Committee consider ways to fund the
$27, 500 in County matching funds which will be required during
the 1989-90 fiscal year, with the clear understanding that if the
Board of Supervisors eventually decides that it cannot afford the
matching funds and no other source of funds can be identified
that the Board of Supervisors will have to refuse to accept the
funds from the San Francisco Foundation. In addition, we have
noted in our recommendations that this is clearly understood to
be one-time funding which will not require any further financial
commitment from the County after June 30, 1990.
��: :;_ �. Joan J.Pace
Contra : -J :.. - Human Relations Commission Executive Secretary
Costa (415)646-2013
f Administration Building
County J ' 651 Pine Street,Room 103
Martinez,California 94553
IIATE VIOLENCE REDUCTION PROJECT
NEED
Hate Violence (violence, harassment, intimidation or threats of violence
motivated by prejudice) in the United States dates back to the conflicts between
the settlers and the American Indians. However, despite the abundance or
rhetoric deploring acts of bigotry no community has coordinated the efforts of
the schools, law enforcement and community organizations to systematically
prevent and respond to it on an ongoing basis. Many exemplary programs can
be found that are effective in. dealing with a particular aspect of bigotry in a
specific setting, but there is no model for weaving efforts to prevent and
respond to hate violence into the fabric of the community.
The project is designed to demonstrate how a county can incorporate a system
for controlling bigotry. The premise of this effort is that hate violence should
be treated with the same concern as crime, sexual abuse, and other abhorrent
activities that schools, law enforcement and other public and private
organizations join forces to attack as a routine societal function.
Community awareness of hate violence is growing-rapidly. California, Maryland
and New York have commissioned special task forces to recommend ways to
control it within the last few years and new legislation has been passed in
a number of states. The timing for developing a model community approach to
reduce hate violence is excellent.
A model county hate violence system would have, at a minimum, the following
characteristics:
PREVENTION
1. Tailored educational curricula and programs designed to promote
appreciation for differences among people reaching all students within
the county;
2. School conflict resolution, and other programs, designed to defuse
conflicts that have the potential to promote prejudice and bigotry
operating within every school;
3. Community programs designed to promote understanding and prevent
conflicts among the diverse population of the county;
4. Ongoing staff training for personnel in relevant private and public
organizations.
-2-
RESPONSE
1. A sustained effort to encourage victims of bigotry to report incidents
and a simple well publicized process for making reports;
2. Uniform reporting by public and private agencies designated to
receive complaints of bigotry, and a protocol for funneling reports
into a county repository for analysis;
3. A procedure for ensuring immediate victim support and protection; i
4. A response plan that goes beyond apprehension of the perpetrators to
include strategies to prevent recurrence;
5. Contingency plans to prevent the escalation of incidents into broader
community conflict;
6. A monitoring and assessment process designed to identify precursors
of hate violence and provide recommendations to prevent potential
flare-ups.
While no definitive data exists on the incidence of hate violence because of the
absence of a national or statewide official reporting process, increases are being
reported by organizations that routinely track incidents. Relatively few
incidents of hate violence perpetrated in California are traceable to organized
groups but the number of organizations promoting acts of bigotry are
proliferating (Skinheads, The Order, White Aryan Resistance and the Aryan
Brotherhood) and few areas are free of their influence.
-4-
Once the design phase is completed the effort will turn to gaining countywide
acceptance of the project and the support necessary to integrate the model into
the routine operation of governmental agencies and community based
organizations. This proposal is to continue support for planning and
development of the project.
-5-
GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
GOAL: TO CREATE A COUNTY MODEL FOR PREVENTING AND RESPONDING
TO HATE VIOLENCE
OBJECTIVES:
1. To secure approval for implementation of uniform policies,
protocols and training for reporting and responding to hate
violence by the Contra Costa County Police Chiefs Association
and the District Attorney by June 30, 1989 and actual
implementation by December 31, 1989.
2. To gain approval for programs, and uniform policies and
protocols for receiving and responding to hate violence on school
campuses by the Contra Costa County School Superintendents'
Association by June 30, 1989, and to complete preparations for
implementation by June 30, 1990.
3. By June 30, 1989, to secure commitments to uniform protocols for
receiving and responding to reports of hate violence by
community based organizations contingent on the procurement of
necessary support. The activities of community based
organizations will include, but not be limited to:
a. maintaining a network of trained volunteers who can provide
emergency counseling to victims;
b. maintaining a network of trained volunteers who can act to
calm community tensions, resolve conflicts, and control
rumors;
C. responding to incidents of harassment and intimidation
motivated by bigotry that are referred by law enforcement
because of the absence of the necessary elements of a "crime".
4. To create a "business plan" for the operation of the community
section of the hate violence reduction system and design a
strategy for the ongoing procurement of the necessary resources
from multiple public and private funding sources by
September 30, 1989 and to begin implementation of the programs
by June 30, 1990.
5. To gain public support for the development of a system for
reducing hate violence in Contra Costa County by involving
3,000 residents in meetings to discuss issues of intolerance and
bigotry and the proposed system for reducing hate violence by
October 31, 1989.
6. To draft and gain approval of memoranda of understanding
delineating policies and protocols for cooperative working
relationships among the local, state and federal public and
private organizations that will participate in an integrated
countywide system for preventing and responding to hate
violence by June 30, 1990.
-6-
METHODOLOGY
CRIMINAL JUSTICE OBJECTIVE:
To secure approval for implementation of policies, protocols and training for
reporting and responding to hate violence by the Contra Costa County Police
Chiefs Association and the District Attorney by June 30, 1989 and actual
implementation by December 31, 1989.
STEPS:
1. Complete process of developing recommendations for policies, protocols
and training from the Criminal Justice Committee of the Hate Violence
Reduction Task Force by March 31, 1989.
2. Review recommendations for policies, protocols and training for
reporting and .responding to hate violence from the Criminal Justice
Committee of the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force with
representatives from Education and Community Committees and
integrate them into a composite system by March 31, 1989.
3. Gain support for the recommendations for reporting hate violence by _
the California Department of Justice and draft a protocol for the
Department's collection, maintenance and analysis of reports of hate
violence from Contra Costa County by April 30, 1989.
4. Prepare recommendations for adoption by the Contra Costa County
Police Chiefs' Association at its June, 1989 meeting.
5. Provide technical assistance and consultation to the California
Department of Justice, District Attorney, police and sheriff
departments and law enforcement academy at Los Medanos College from
the time of the plan's adoption to December 31, 1989 to ensure .
uniform implementation of the recommendations.
r
-7-
SCHOOLS OBJECTIVE:
To secure approval of programs and uniform policies and procedures for
preventing and responding hate violence on school campuses by the Contra
Costa County School Superintendents' Association by June 30, 1989 and complete
preparations for implementation by June 30, 1990.
STEPS
1. Complete the process for drafting recommendations for programs,
policies, procedures and training to prevent and respond to hate
violence in schools in Contra Costa County by March 31, 1989.
2. Gain recognition and support of the Contra, Costa County School
Superintendents for the process being used to design a system to
prevent and respond to incidents of hate violence on the school
campus by the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force by November 30,
1988.
3. Review recommendations for programs, policies, procedures and
training for preventing and responding to hate violence from the
Education Committee with representatives from the Criminal Justice
and Community Committees of the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force
and integrate them into a composite system by March 31, 1989.
4. Present the final draft of the recommendations of the Education
Committee to the Contra Costa County Association of School
Superintendents' for adoption at its June, 1989 meeting.
5. Convene meetings of representatives from the school boards and
representatives of teacher, student and parent groups within each
school district beginning June, 1989 to coordinate efforts to begin
implementation of the program and develop strategies to ensure -the
efforts are ongoing.
-8-
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS OBJECTIVES
A. PLANNING
By June 30, 1989 secure commitments to uniform protocols for receiving and
responding to reports of hate violence by community based organizations
contingent on the procurement of necessary support. The activities of
community based organizations will include, but not be limited to:
1. maintaining a network of trained volunteers who can provide emergency
counseling to victims;
2. maintaining a network of trained volunteers who can act to calm
community tensions, resolve conflicts, and control rumors;
3. responding to incidents of harassment and intimidation motivated by
bigotry that are referred by law enforcement because of the absence of
the necessary elements of a "crime"
STEPS:
a. Draft recommendations for community activities and projects to
prevent hate violence by March 31, 1989.
b. Designate private and public organizations to receive and report
incidents of hate violence and draft uniform procedures for their use
in Contra Costa County by March 31, 1989.
C. Designate selected community based organizations to provide support
for victims of hate violence and identify training needs for their staff
and volunteers by March 31, 1989.
d. Designate private and public organizations to respond to conflicts
,resulting from hate violence and ease tension by March 31, 1989.
e. Designate private and public organizations to respond to incidents of
hate violence referred by law enforcement, draft uniform procedures
for their use and identify training needs for their staff and
volunteers by March 31, 1989.
f. Review recommendations for programs, policies, and procedures for
preventing and responding to hate violence from the Community
Committee and with representatives from the Criminal Justice and
Education Committees of the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force and
integrate them into a composite system with the proposals form the
other committees by March 31, 1989.
g. Review final recommendations for a hate violence reduction system
with appropriate public and private organizations in Contra Costa
County and gain their support by June 30, 1989.
-9-
B. DEVELOPMENT
To create a "business plan" for the operation of the community section of the
hate violence reduction system and design a strategy for the ongoing
procurement of the necessary resources from multiple public and private
funding sources by September 30, 1989 and to begin implementation of the
programs by June 30, 1990.
STEPS
a. Draft a "business plan" for the operation of the hate violence system
in Contra Costa County by September 30, 1989 identifying:
1) the products needed to be offered by public and private
community agencies as part of the integrated system for
preventing and responding to hate violence within the county;
2) start up costs required to begin the provision of the services;
3) the potential sources of revenue in the public and private
sector.
b. Involve the public and private sector in designing and following a
strategy to secure the resources needed to enable the community to
implement its components of the countywide system for preventing and
responding to hate violence. The strategy will be drafted in a series
of meetings between June 30, 1989 and September 30, 1989 and
actively pursued between October 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990.
Identified sources of support include, but are not limited to:
1) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and local
governments and agencies within the county;
2) The California Office of Criminal Justice Planning Special Victims
Program;
3) The United States Department of Justice program for research
into hate violence;
4) The California Legislature;
5) Appropriate private funding sources
-10-
PUBLIC SUPPORT OBJECTIVE:
To gain public support for implementing a hate violence reduction system in
Contra Costa County by involving 3,000 residents in gatherings to discuss
issues of intolerance and bigotry and the proposed system for reducing hate
violence by October 31, 1989.
STEPS
a. Identify and train members of the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force
and the human relations commissions within Contra Costa County to
facilitate small community meetings on the need to promote tolerance
for diversity and eliminate bigotry.
b. Request the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and city
councils within the county to designate October, 1989 as Eliminate
Bigotry Month and publicize the plan to hold small meetings
throughout the County to explore issues of diversity and discuss the
hate violence reduction program.
C. Use references from public officials, schools and community
organizations to identify 300 sites throughout the county where
meetings of ten people (a total of 3,000 people will be involved) could
be held to discuss the need to promote tolerance for diversity and the
plan proposed by the Hate Violence Reduction Task Force.
d. Publicize schedules of meetings in the media, in the schools, in
religious institutions and through public and community based
organizations.
e. Conduct small meetings throughout the county during the month of
October on appreciating diversity and highlight the design for
preventing and responding to hate violence in Contra Costa.
-11-
OBJECTIVE FOR INSTITUTIONALIZING THE SYSTEM
To draft and gain approval of memoranda of understanding delineating policies
and protocols for cooperative working relationships among the local, state and
federal public and private organizations participating in the hate violence
reduction system by June 30, 1990.
STEPS
a. Draft and submit tentative memoranda of understanding for clarifying
policies and procedures to the public and private agencies working
together. as part of the county system for preventing and responding
to hate violence by December 31, 1989.
b. Beet with agencies as necessary to clarify and adapt working
agreements to meet their individual needs. Negotiate final agreements
to further the goal of developing an integrated system for preventing
and responding to hate violence by June 30, 1990.
J
-12-
.BUDGET
January 1, 1989 - June 30, 1990
(18 months)
PROFESSIONAL FEES
PROJECT DIRECTOR-50% time @ $25,000/yr 37,500
(Human Relations Commission Director)
PROJECT Coordinator-50% time @ $20,000/yr 30,000
Project 'Secretary-100% time @ $25,000/yr 37,500
TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS $70,000/yr 105,000
NON-PERSONNEL EXPENSES
OFFICE SPACE & UTILITIES $10,000 CONTRIBUTED
OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 5,000 CONTRIBUTED
TELEPHONE 4,000 CONTRIBUTED
POSTAGE 2,000 CONTRIBUTED
COPYING 2,000 CONTRIBUTED
TRAVEL EXPENSES 2,000 CONTRIBUTED
TOTAL NON-PERSONNEL COSTS $25,000 CONTRIBUTED
REQUEST TWO TO ONE MATCH FOR PROFESSIONAL FEES ONLY.
San Francisco Foundation Request $70,000 for 18 months
Contra Costa County Contribution
and other solicited contributions:
$35,000 for professional fees
$25,000 non-personnel costs