The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 02141989 - 1.44 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ��,sE_-L of 1-04 Phil Batchelor f r t; Contra FROM: County Administrator nts Costa February 6, 1989 County�'�;-._ - .�,A�� DATE: 4sTq-cooN Report #2 from O'Brien-Kreitzberg and Associates SUBJECT: regarding County Detention Facilities SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION• Acknowledge receipt of Report #2 from O'Brien-Kreitzberg and Associates regarding the status of justice facility construction in the County. BACKGROUND: O'Brien-Kreitzberg has been providing the Board of Supervisors with regular reports on the status of the West County Justice Center. They have now combined this series of reports with the Marsh Creek Detention Center and Main Detention Center so the Board of Supervisors has a comprehensive view of the status of all work on the County' s detention centers. (See attached report. ) We will continue to provide these reports to the Board on a monthly basis. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON February 14, 1989 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator FEB 14 1989 CC: Sheriff-Coroner ATTESTED General Services Dept. PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF County Counsel SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR e/Az BY DEPUTY M382 (10/88) \ 1 i IL-044 SE Ar- _�. A coux�' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JUSTICE PROGRAM WEST COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER MARSH CREEK DETENTION FACILITY MARTINEZ DETENTION FACILITY PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 . O'BRIEN-KREITZBERG & ASSOCIATES. INC. Project and Construction Managers O'Brien-Kreitzberg Professional Construction Managers November 22, 1988 Mr. George Roemer Director, Justice System Programs Office of the County Administrator County Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 Subject: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JUSTICE PROGRAM Progress Report No. 2 Dear Mr. Roemer: Enclosed for your information is the Contra Costa County Justice Program Progress Report for September 1988. Sincerely, O'BRIEN-RREITLBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. o�"•L. . 7Roinso AIA �. onstr ction er Enclosure O'Brien-Kreitzberg&Associates,Inc. Bayside Plaza Telephone (.115)777-0188 188 The Embarcadero San Francisco,CA 94105 c L CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JU,,.S,. TI CE PROGRAM PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 DISTFIBUTION LIST I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY P. Batchelor - County Administrator G. Roemer - Director, Justice System Programs R. Rainey - Sheriff-Coroner J. Mitosinka - Sheriff's Department L. Ard - Sheriff's Department J. Robinson - Sheriff's Department C. Kizziah - Criminal Justice Programs R. Rygh - General Services Department T. Mann - General Services Department S. Marchesi - County Counsel's Office DWORSKY-DESIGN PARTNERSHIP J. Smith - Los Angeles J. Kibre - San Francisco O'BRIEN-KREITZBERG & ASSOCIATES S. Sheftel R. Robinson L. Stoll G. MacClelland C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 C O N T E N T S , Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION 11 A. SCHEDULE ANALYSIS 13 B. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 22 III. ATTACHMENTS 33 A. COST SUMMARY 35 B. POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER LOGS 39 C. POTENTIAL CLAIM LOG 44 D. SCHEDULE 46 C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J .0 S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEprEnER 1988 S E C T I O N I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -1- v ' C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , A. INTRODUCTION: This report is subdivided into three major sections: 1) Executive Summary, 2) Detailed Schedule and Financial Information and 3) Attachments. It describes the design and construction progress as well as Areas of Concern for the West County Justice Center, Marsh Creek Detention Facility and Martinez Detention Facility achieved during the period of September 1988. B. GENERAL: 1. West County Justice Center a. Furnishings, Equipment and Signage: The Architect conducted five workshops for the facility users to review furnishings, equipment and signage requirements. b. Community Participation. There have been no recent meetings of the West County Justice Center Advisory Group. The Employment and Training Committee met September 21. C. Site Acquisition There is. no scheduled activity associated with the eminent domain lawsuit. The County's special counsel filed an At-Issue Memo on September 6, requesting a mandatory settlement conference to be held in January 1989. -2- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 2. Marsh Creek Detention Facility • Wastewater Treatment Facility The wastewater treatment facility project was not publicly announced during design thus resulting in community surprise and protest once construction began. As a result of the community outcry, the Sheriff's Department and Supervisor Torlakson each conducted a public information meeting at the Marsh Creek Detention Facility. These meetings did not result in a compromise recommended by some members of the community, who subsequently filed a lawsuit in Superior Court on September 15. Work was temporarily halted, and on September 27 the Court ruled that construction of a wastewater treatment facility could not proceed until the County complied with the California Environmental Quality Act. C. SCHEDULE: 1. West County Justice Center a. Design: The following is the current interior and graphic design schedule: Preliminary design presentation Nov. 1, 1988 Design Development design presentation Dec. 1, 1988 Contract Documents phase Jan. 17 - Apr. 3, 1989 -3- u C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 b. Construction: 1) Contract A: Substantially complete. 2) Contract B: Construction contract critical activities were underslab utility installations, foundation footing construction and slab pours. Schedule status is as follows on September 25: Construction Approved Contractor Legal Forecasted Progress Extension Slippage Completion Completion ------------ --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 5% 0 -4 4/13/90 4/13/90* Based on Contractor's schedule. 2. Marsh Creek Detention Facility a. Design ♦ Master Plan Design Partnership is preparing a Master Plan for the rehabilitation of the Marsh Creek Detention Facility. The draft master plan report is due mid-October for review. The final report to be completed in December will prioritize and describe each proposed project. ♦ Modular Dormitories The Contractor's schedule called for all review comments by September 26 with revised drawings to be completed by October 3. The County's Building Department and the Board of Corrections did not submit their comments within the scheduled period. The Contractor is working directly with the State Fire Marshal's office. b. Construction ♦ Wastewater Treatment Facility Work was stopped on September 27. Due to the lawsuit, the Contractor is limited to activities required to secure the site and prepare it for the winter rain. -4- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J'U 'S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 ♦ Modular Dormitories Following are the design-construct contract current activities: Begin Site Work October 3, 1988 Begin Installation of Modular Units November 14, 1988 Substantial Completion, First Dorm. December 31, 1988 Substantial Completion, Second Dorm. February 20, 1989 3. Martinez Detention Facility a. Design The working drawings phase of design is scheduled to begin in late November or early December. D. FINANCIAL: 1. Program Budget Original ; Budget ; ; Recorded ; Current ;Under(Over) Description; Estimate ; Allocation Encumbrances; Expenses Forecast ; Estimate WCJC ;$48,760,695 ;$45,636,548 ; $42,930,082 ;$5,607,280 ;$46,500,000 ;$2,260,695 MCDF ; 6,870,000 ; 2,348,667 ; 4,657;;368*; 1,300,031 ; 6,870,000 ; 0 MDF 740,000 225,000 95,440 ; 28,490 740,000 0 TOTAL ;$56,370,695 ;$48,210,215 ; $47,682,890 ;$6,935,810 ;$54,110,000 ;$2,260,695 * Encumbrance will exceed County allocation until contract with Board of Corrections for modular dormitory construction is executed. 2. West County Justice Center Construction Contracts A & B: * A. Encumbered for.Construction: $31,878,554 B. Charge Order Allowance: 1,563,169 C. Approved Change Orders: 106,513 D. Changes in Progress: 113,864 E. Balance of Change Order Allowance: 1,342,792 Includes Change Order Allowances. -5- C O N T R A C O S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 3. Marsh Creek Detention Facility Program Budget: $6,870,000 Encumbered: 4,669,881 Professional services: $ 354,678 Construction: 4,280,333 Miscellaneous: 34,870 Budget Remaining: $2,200,119 4. Martinez Detention Facility Professional Services Budget: $200,000 Encumbered to Date: 95,440 Expenses Reported: 28,490 E. MAJOR AREAS OF CONCERN: 1. Test County Justice Center: ♦ Contract A: Oliver de Silva, Inc. d a. Turns at Private Road Problem: Pinole Point Steel Company complained that the turns for the private road were causing a potential traffic hazard. Action: The Civil Engineer provided a revised design to widen the paved shoulder area. By September 9, 1988, the work was essentially completed. b. Storm Drain in the Park: Problem: Point Pinole Regional Park complained that the storm drain outlet in the Park was built too close to roads and bike trails, thus presenting a potential safety hazard. Action: The Civil Engineer provided a revised design to extend the storm drain. When the contractor started the extension on September 24, two unknown sewer pipes were found crossing the trench in the way of the storm drain. Work came to a stop pending clarification from the park. -6- C N T R A C O S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 Contract B: Walsh Construction Company a. Alleged Delay Due to Plumbing & Structural Conflicts: Problem: Contractor claimed 24 days and $59,000 due to alleged conflicts between the underground plumbing and structural footings. Action: The Construction Manager developed an independent schedule analysis. The contractor provided a revised claim which is split in two parts for detailing costs and field costs. The detailing claim was reviewed at a meeting September 21, with the contractor. A meeting is scheduled for next month to review the field costs. b. Unforeseen Soil Condition: Problem: An unforeseen soil condition was found under Buildings 5, 7and 8. Action: The structural engineer redesigned the slab reinforcing per the soil engineer's recommendation. The contractor has been requested to provide change order pricing. C. County Code Inspections: Problem: The timing of the County Code Inspections is critical to the successful completion of the fast track project. Inspection cannot be accomplished as a standard commercial project for two reasons: (1) the County has exposure for any alleged delay caused by its inspectors as opposed to a commercial project and (2) the aggressive construction schedule of 21 months to alleviate jail over=crowding must be maintained. Therefore, extraordinary measures must be taken by all concerned including the County Code Inspector to reduce exposure and to maintain the schedule. Action: A meeting was held with the code inspectors to establish procedures to help expedite and to reduce potential claims. d. Fence. Post Construction: Problem: The code inspector interpreted a requirement for a three inch clearance between the reinforcing and excavation. He required the contractor to use spacer blocks to establish the required clearance. Action: It was determined by the structural engineer that the code allows a 21 inch space which was being provided by the contractor and that the contractor may use temporary spacers in lieu of setting all reinforcing on permanent spacers. -7- r C O N T R A C O S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 Contract B: Walsh Construction Company(Cont'd) e. Change Order Pricing: Problem: The contractor continues to fall behind in his notification and pricing as required by the contract. This does not allow the County the required time to consider all options regarding changes. Action: The contractor was directed to provide notices and pricing or waive their rights to the changes. f. Schedule Delay: Problem: As noted above, the contractor is 4 days behind schedule. Action: The CM and Contractor have developed work-around solutions to expedite the work by making block activities concurrent rather than sequential with concrete work. It is forecasted that the Contractor can regain lost time. g. Fire Marshal Changes: Problem: The State Fire Marshal made changes to the drawings after approval. Action: Contractor was issued a proposed change to provide pricing. h. Topsoil: Problem: The Architect questioned the type of soil existing in the stockpile designated topsoil and the type of admixture. Action: The CM instructed the Contractor to test soil. i. CPM Schedule• Problem: The initial CPM schedule was rejected due to questionable activity durations, crew loading, cost loading and logic. Action: The Contractor is to revise and resubmit the schedule. In addition, a series of meetings are being held to review the subcontractors schedules and crew loading. We have found that the contractor's CPM does not represent the subcontractor's schedule. j . Design Change Orders: Problem: A series of user workshops to develop furniture and equipment layout plans identified a number of construction changes, i.e. , the addition or relocation of . electric and communications outlets, relocation of doors and light fixtures, cabinetry modifications, etc. These changes will increase construction costs and have potential for construction delay. -8- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J.0 S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 Action: Each requested or identified change was reviewed for operational necessity, resulting in some changes not being accepted. Of the accepted changes, those affecting critical path construction activities were handled on a fast track basis. The balance of the change order work will be processed as the Architect is able to prepare the necessary design documents. These changes should have a minimal impact on the schedule. 2. Marsh Creek Detention Facility: ♦ Modular Dormitories a. Facility Utilities: Problem: The MCDF infrastructure (gas, electric, sewer, water) is not well documented, under-sized and limited in distribution. This system needs to be upgraded before service to the dorms can be provided. Action: The contractor's plans call for the connection to existing utilities not yet in place. Concurrent with the design phase of this project, the facility's existing utilities were documented. John Carollo Engineers will design modifications to provide a sewer connection and a new water main for fire protection ( both fire sprinkler 'and hydrants). PG&E will install a new electric transformer and service. The contractor will be issued a change order to install a new propane storage tank, modify the alignment of the sewer and electrical connections, and install a new water main. b. Design Review: Problem: . The product submittals generally occur during the construction phase of a project; however, since this is a design-build project, the contractor has scheduled processing submittals concurrent with the design review and revision phase of work. Action: Although this review process presents some risks and may require some resubmittals caused by design changes, we have agreed to concurrent review in order to achieve an accelerated project schedule. To date, submittal approvals have been timely to the construction activities. ♦ Wastewater Treatment Facility a. Work Stoppage: Problem: The Court ordered that the County cannot proceed with the wastewater treatment facility until it complies with the California Environmental Quality Act. This requirement will delay completion of the contract 8 to 12 months, and will result in the ongoing use of the facility's failing leach fields. -9- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 Action: The County's design engineer will modify the existing plans to allow installation of planned sewer lines unrelated to the proposed wastewater treatment plant. In addition, other alternative maintenance and conservation actions are being planned to mitigate the system potential for failure. This emergency work will be done on a time and material basis. 3. Martinez Detention Facility: a. Operational Impact of Construction: Problem: The MDF is significantly crowded, a condition which impacts any construction within inmate areas. Where possible, areas should be cleared for construction activities and storage of equipment and materials. Action: The relocation of approximately 200 inmates to the Marsh Creek Detention Facility will improve the opportunity for staged construction activities in areas free of inmates. The architect will be required to include special staging requirements as part of the construction contract's general requirements. The construction period was originally planned to begin in late 1988 but has been postponed until after the Marsh Creek population expansion occurs. If the delay in constructing a new wastewater treatment facility delays planned inmate expansion at Marsh Creek, the MDF construction may occur in inmate occupied areas. -10- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 S E C T I O N I I DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION -11- C 0 N T R A C O S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 S E C T I O N I I D E T A I L E D P R O J E C T I NF O R M A T I O N Contents: A. Schedule: 1. General 2. West County Justice Center a. Design b. Construction 3. Marsh Creek Detention Facility a. Design b. Construction 4. Martinez Detention Facility a. Design B. Financial: 1. General 2. West County Justice Center a. Design b. Construction 3. Marsh Creek Detention Facility a. Design b. Construction 4. Martinez Detention Facility a. Design b. Construction -12- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R 0 G R A H PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 SECTION II/PART A S C H E D U L E A N A L Y S I S -13- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 SCHEDULE ANALYSIS A. GENERAL: The detailed schedule report is subdivided by three projects: 1) West County Justice Center, 2) Marsh Creek Detention Facility and 3) Martinez Detention Facility. The three projects are further divided into the design and construction phases. The Design portion will include general design data and a progress narrative. The Construction section will be subdivided by each contract and will provide contract data, a progress narrative, plus a bar chart. 1. West County Justice Center a. Design: The furnishing, equipment and signage phase of design remains on schedule. Design workshops were held with County personnel on September 15, 16 and 20. A progress review meeting is scheduled on October 6. b. Construction: The West County Justice Center project includes two contracts: 1) The first contract was for the rough grading of the project site (Contract A), which is substantially complete. 2) The second is for the construction of the detention facility (Contract B). The detailed reports for each contract follow: -14- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 AUGUST 1988 SCHEDULE ANALYSIS West County Justice Center Site Grading Contract CONTRACT A: Oliver de Silva Report Date: . September 25, 1988 A. SCHEDULE STATUS: PROGRESS TO DATE: PLANNED: 98% ACTUAL: 98% INITIAL CONTRACTUAL DURATION: 180 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED: 84 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION APPROVED: 84 CALENDAR DAYS CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS NOTICE TO PROCEED: 10/12/87 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: 4/8/88 REVISED CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: 7/2/88 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: 7/2/88 COMPLETION VARIANCE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS B. PROGRESS NARRATIVE: As of July 2, 1988, Contract A was substantially complete (except for pump station equipment, which is contractually scheduled for completion in May 1989). Punch list work is getting close to completion. -15- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 AUGUST 1988 SCHEDULE ANALYSIS West County Justice Center Construction Contract CONTRACT B: Walsh Construction Company Report Date: September 25, 1988 A. SCHEDULE STATUS: PROGRESS TO DATE Planned: 12.007 Actual: 5.007 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL DURATION: 640 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED: 28 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION APPROVED: 0 CALENDAR DAYS CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE: -4 CALENDAR DAYS NOTICE TO PROCEED: 7/8/88 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: 4/9/88 REVISED CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: N/A FORECASTED COMPLETION: 4/13/88* COMPLETION VARIANCE: -4 CALENDAR DAYS (Forecasted vs Initial Completion) 4/13/88 is Contractor's Forecasted Completion based on its 9/25/88 CPM schedule update. B. PROGRESS NARRATIVE 1. Building One (Administration Building) - Underfooting electrical conduit installation was .close to 1007 complete. Underground plumbing installation was approximately 807 complete. Foundation construction and the first two courses of concrete blocks, both started at the west side of Building No. 1. According to the Contractor's CPM original progress schedule update, the project critical path still goes. through Building No. 1; however, the delay caused by underground plumbing/structural conflicts has been decreased from 18 calendar days to 4 calendar days. -16- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 AUGUST 1988 Schedule Analysis Walsh Construction Company (continued)- 2. Building Two . (Medical/Dental/Library/Classroom Building): No progress. 3. Building Three (Multi-purpose Building): No progress. 4. Building Four (Inmate Housing/Central Visiting): Foundation footing construction and underslab plumbing were close to 1007 complete. First 2 courses of concrete blocks were 907 completed. Under-footing electrical work was about 457 complete. 5. Building Five (Inmate Housing): Foundation footing construction was 25% complete. Underslab plumbing was 987 complete. 6. Building Six (Inmate Housing): Foundation footing construction was 707 complete. Underslab plumbing was 407 complete. 7. Building Seven (Inmate Housing): Foundation footing construction was 707 complete. Underslab plumbing was 407 complete. 8. Building Eight (Inmate Housing): Underground plumbing materials delivered. Foundation footing construction was 707 complete. Underslab plumbing was 907 complete. Electrical/communication conduits through the first 2 courses were 957 complete. 9. Site Utilities: Storm drain system was approximately 937 complete. Sanitary sewer system was approximately 927 complete. Site water line was approximately 807 complete. No progress on site gas line system. Site underground electrical installation was approximately 777 complete. Site communication underground conduit installation just started. 10. Site Work: Phase 1 security fence pole installation was about 367 complete. -17- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 2. Marsh Creek Detention Facility a. Design ♦ Modular Dormitories This project was bid as a design-build project using performance specifications and Design Development phase drawings. The contractor submitted a set of construction documents on August 23. These documents were distributed to the State Fire Marshal, California Board of Corrections, the Eastern Fire District and the County's Building Inspection Department for their review and approval. Review comments were due September 23, however, only the State Fire Marshal and Eastern Fire District had responded by that date. The Construction Manager rejected the civil drawings as being incomplete. ♦ Wastewater Treatment Facility John Carollo Engineers' scope of work was expanded to include design of a sewer lateral and fire main to the new dormitories. The consultant was also asked to look at mitigation measures that could be taken to keep the existing system (septic tanks and leach fields) operational through another winter. b. Construction Currently the Marsh Creek Detention Facility program includes two contracts for the construction and installation of the modular dormitories and the construction of the wastewater treatment facility. Reports for each project follow: -18- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 AUGUST 1988 SCHEDULE ANALYSIS Marsh Creek Detention Facility Modular Dormitories CONTRACTOR: Meehleis Modular Buildings, Inc. Report Date: September 25, 1988 A. SCHEDULE STATUS: PROGRESS TO DATE Planned: 107 Actual: 157 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL DURATION: 200 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED: 0 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION APPROVED: 0 CALENDAR DAYS CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS NOTICE TO PROCEED: 8/2/88 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: 2/17/89* REVISED CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: N/A FORECASTED COMPLETION: 2/17/89 COMPLETION VARIANCE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS Completion schedule for second dormitory. First dormitory is scheduled for occupancy on December 31, 1988 B. PROGRESS NARRATIVE: In-plant, twenty-four (24) 12' x 40' steel modules were erected and approximately 57 of the rough carpentry work has been completed. The design phase is 807 complete and is pending the Board of Correction and County Building Department design review comments. -19- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 AUGUST 1988 r SCHEDULE ANALYSIS Marsh Creek Detention Facility Wastewater Treatment Facility CONTRACTOR: Pacific Mechanical Corporation Report Date: September 25, •1988 A. SCHEDULE STATUS: PROGRESS TO DATE Planned: 257 Actual: 207 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL DURATION: 180 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED: 0 CALENDAR DAYS TIME EXTENSION APPROVED: 0 CALENDAR DAYS CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS NOTICE TO PROCEED: 8/24/88 INITIAL CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: 1/15/88 REVISED CONTRACTUAL COMPLETION: N/A FORECASTED COMPLETION: 1/15/88 COMPLETION VARIANCE: 0 CALENDAR DAYS B. PROGRESS NARRATIVE: The 1007 complete plans and specifications were issued to the contractor on September 5. The contractor had to grade both the aerated lagoon and percolation pond site simultaneously. Therefore; the grading of the aerated lagoon is approximately 257 complete and the grading of the percolation ponds is approximately 107 complete. A peremptory writ of mandate was filed on September 16 and a Temporary Restraining Order took effect on September 19. The barring of construction of an above ground wastewater treatment facility caused the project to delay 6 calendar days. A hearing is scheduled for September 27, at which time major milestone delays will be evaluated. -20- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 3. Martinez Detention Facility a. Design I The Architect's fee proposal for providing Construction Documents, Bidding and Construction phase services was sent to the County on August 11, 1988. Additional supporting information is being provided as a result of discussions between the Project Manager and Architect. A draft Architectural Agreement will be drafted in the coming month with work scheduled to begin on the Construction Documents phase in November or December. -21- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 SECTION II/PART B F I N A N C I A L A N A L Y S I S -22- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 SECTION II/PART B , FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1. General: The detailed financial report is divided into three projects: 1) West County Justice Center, 2) Marsh Creek Detention Facility and 3) Martinez Detention Facility. The three projects are further divided into the Design and Construction phases. The Design portion will include a narrative. The Construction section will be subdivided by each contract and will provide contract data, where available, narratives and cost curves. -23- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS West .County Justice Center SECTION II/PART B 2. Test County Justice Center a. Design: The Architect's basic fee is $2,705,923 of which $2,274,119 (84%) has been paid. In addition, the Architect has been authorized $376,020 for extra services, of which $17,762 has been paid. b. Construction: The West County Justice Center financial report includes two contracts: 1) The first contract was for the rough grading of the project site (Contract "A"). The contingency for Contract "A" will be in deficit by ($22,576), if all changes are approved. 2) The second was for the construction of the detention facility (Contract "B"). The remaining contingency for Contract "B" is $1,383,280. The detailed report for each contract follows: -24- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U, S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS West County Justice Center Site Grading Contract CONTRACT A: Oliver de Silva Report Date: September 25, 1988 1. FINANCIAL STATUS: A. CONTRACT AWARD $1,367,785 * B. CONTINGENCY $ 116,389 C. BUDGET (A + B) $1,484,174 **D. APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $ 106,513 E. NUMBER OF CHANGE ORDERS 15 F. CHANGES IN PROGRESS $ 32,452 G. CONTINGENCY BALANCE (B - D - F) ($ 22,576) H. CLAIMS $ 0 I. POTENTIAL EXPOSURE (A+D+F+H) $1,506,750 '**J. VARIANCE ($ 22,576) K. PAYMENTS TO DATE $1,388,647 Includes the 5% Supplemental Work Allowance ($68,389) and the $48,000 right-of-way delay negotiated settlement. ^* Includes executed Change Orders Nos. 1 through 15. Claims and pending change orders. are in addition to this amount. ^'^ ($22,576) is the amount of cost overrun beyond the contingency amount, due to changes which are in progress and may not be approved subject to negotiation . 2. NARRATIVE: Oliver de Silva did not request a progress payment for punch list work performed during this report period. -25- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS West County Justice Center Construction Contract SECTION II/PART B CONTRACT B: Walsh Construction Co. Report Date: August 26, 1988 through September 25, 1988 1. FINANCIAL STATUS: A. CONTRACT AWARD $28,947,600 B. CONTINGENCY $ 1,446,780 C. BUDGET (A + B) $30,394,380 D. APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $ 0 E. NUMBER OF CHANGE ORDERS 0 F. CHANGES IN PROGRESS $ 81,412 G. CONTINGENCY BALANCE (B - D - F) $ 1,365,368 H. CLAIMS $ 60,000 I. POTENTIAL EXPOSURE (A+D+F) $29,029,012 J. VARIANCE $ 1,365,368 K. PAYMENTS TO DATE $ 1,337,942 2. NARRATIVE: A. PC's issued for Pricing this Period: B-11 Change Door Type and Add Sprinkler B-12 Size of Water Service Laterals B-13 Encase Pipe Columns W/CMU B. Of the thirteen (13) PC's issued to date, price quotations for 6 PC's (Nos. 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 13) have been received. The prices for PC B-03 (+$3,425), and PC B-06 (-$7,432) have been negotiated and change order documents are being prepared by the Construction Manager. PC B-07 was voided. PC B-10 has been agreed to be performed on a time-and-material basis. Prices for other PC's are still outstanding from the Contractor. -26- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J ,U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 CONTRACT B: WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (continued) 3. COST CURVE: (see attached) The attached cost curve compares the cumulative actual value of work completed as . of the report date (9/25/88) to the Contractor's forecast of value of work completed over the contract period. The Contractor's forecast (early start forecast and late start forecast) are based on the values assigned to individual activities in the Contractor's initial progress schedule. The actual value of work completed ($1,337,942) includes value of permanent work accomplished plus value of permanent materials furnished to and stored at the site. The actual amount of payment to the Contractor is the actual value of work less retention. -27- O C� \ O O o P � Z►r r _ N 00 N Q z►► 000 4 N Z 00 4 LLJr NJ \ 0 LLJ g N N ►f v O w � W Ol lei V r \ O + d LLJ 00 O Z (v 00 V_ N J \ �QQ N l� 00 O D 0 o 0 0 co 000 F—� O co cD �Kt N O OD cD It N O o0 w N O LO No N N N N N •- •— O (SUOIJIIw) S8V-110a 3AIld-inWno -28- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 3. Marsh Creek Detention Facility a. Design: In 1985/86/87, the General Services Department spent approximately $1,146,900 for the design, management and construction of a 120-bed modular dormitory. Although begun before the current master planning and development activities, the Board of Corrections staff has determined that this project is eligible for Proposition 52 funding. An additional $338,900 has been encumbered since 1987 for the planning, design and management of the various projects at the MCDF. To date, $164,065 of this encumbrance has been paid to the professional consultants. b. Construction: The Marsh Creek Detention Facility financial report includes two contracts:. 1) The first contract is for the design, fabrication and installation of two 120-bed modular dormitories. The contract award was $2,449,000 of which $116,619 is a supplemental work allowance for change orders. 2) The second contract is for the construction of a Wastewater Treatment Facility. This work is being executed on a time and materials basis with a contract limit of $735,000. -29- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Marsh Creek Detention Facility Modular Dormitories Construction Contract CONTRACT Meehleis Modular Buildings, Inc. Report Date: September 25, 1988 1. FINANCIAL STATUS: A. CONTRACT AWARD $ 2,332,381 B. CONTINGENCY $ 116,619 C. BUDGET (A + B) $2,449,000 D. APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $ 0 E. NUMBER OF CHANGE ORDERS 0 F. CHANGES IN PROGRESS $ 10,515 G. CONTINGENCY BALANCE (B - D - F) $ 106,104 H. CLAIMS $ 0 I. POTENTIAL EXPOSURE (A+D+F) $ 2,438,485 J. VARIANCE $ 0 K. PAYMENTS TO DATE $ 70,000 2. NARRATIVE: PCO 1 is for the removal of asbestos products in the existing dormitory and bath house. This change order must be awarded before demolition can proceed. -30- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Marsh Creek Detention Facility Wastewater Treatment Facility Construction Contract CONTRACT A: Pacific Mechanical Corporation Report Date: September 25, 1988 1. FINANCIAL STATUS: A. CONTRACT AWARD $ 735,000 B. CONTINGENCY $ 14,700 C. BUDGET (A + B) $ 749,700 D. APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS $ 0 E. NUMBER OF CHANGE ORDERS 0 F. CHANGES IN PROGRESS $ 0 G. CONTINGENCY BALANCE (B - D - F) $ 14,700 H. CLAIMS $ 0 I. POTENTIAL EXPOSURE (A+D+F) $ 735,000 J. VARIANCE $ 14,700 K. PAYMENTS TO DATE $ 49,126 2. NARRATIVE: Time and material contract. -31- C O N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 4. Martinez Detention Facility a.. Design: ' Design Development drawings and cost estimate for the alterations to M- and F-Modules were submitted in May. Upon negotiation and award of an architectural agreement, Design Partnership will begin the Contract Documents portion of the design process. To date, the County has spent $28,490 in consultant fees. b. Construction: The construction estimate is $386,259, which is based on the architect's Design Development phase estimate. -32- C O N T R A C O S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 . SEPTEMBER 1988 S E C T I O N III A T T A C H M E N T S -33- C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 S E C T I O N I I I , C O N T E N T S: 1. Attachment A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost Summary 2. Attachment B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Change Order Logs a. West County Justice Center, Project A b. West County Justice Center, Project B c. Marsh Creek Detention Facility, Modular Dormitory Project 3. Attachment C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Claim Log a. West County Justice Center, Project B 4. Attachment D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schedule a. West County Justice Center. Project B b. Marsh Creek Detention Facility ♦ Wastewater Treatment Facility ♦ Modular Dormitories -34- C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 A T T A C H M E N T A -35- y�j O N 00 O O O O O ir) Ml a1 O M O O O N O N O� 1-1 iJ O rrl Ln O O N O 00 lO O H M o U U •d 0d N to � O Lr) rl O N %O pc7 c0 G O Lr) Lt') %O N H O M W U C) O o o O O O o O o O O 41 O O O O O O O o O O O U C W o o O o o O O o 0 o O 0 m u o 0 C 0 0 0 0 C C o O o O o O O o O 00 O O N N •-+ N tr1 %0 V) M %0 �O O� tf1 H V ppy M N Cl)4 -� v� 401. OI r� N N rr1 1�0 O .14 d O-4 00 U1 00 1-4 n O M 1.0 N C!1 +j +jto to C; CIT H A ON T u1 r N N V) ' O .-•� N N T �O O yJ N U � fs� a1 0-- l N f� �O N 00 U N •w CI i \ Ci o N 00 r l ppp�4 U POi` CD C4 � ^ s r r Im VHy i�7 y r- N kO O o T o M N R7 U D 0l o T 00 T o v'1 o cr) 00 •4 u • 4 rn -, rn M Lf) o o r r o E-4 4-1to H A C ., ao 10 N 00 o M � r o r•i 41 .� O .-4 T T 00 N rrl O� O w 4 Z U U H z d n N %c N o T Lr) � o C > O O 00 1.0 O r, T N O �U •.r 00 T r O� M -+ rr) U') t r N 41 00 1c70 \ O� T 00 O N �O CO N r r N p i 00 T N O% U M40 pQi� t, O O O O o o O O �7 U O 00 O o O O O O O O T O u1 C d� ir4� .-•r o O O O O o O T O tl 00 r0 00 O� O O O O O rr1 O N O t 1 O t-i V u .4 0 0 0 0 o o T o 1-4 r.7 O O N rr) %0 O N �o rr) • -4 d C4 6 A M N T N •� rn-7 � to Cl) M 00 00 O 00 N O O O O O O Irl U1 0) O %O Q` O O N O O M 00 O� O T T O O N O O •-� M cD (� w •epi V) N O O o N O O O O O Q 1 Oa• N r- T rr) o rr) rl O 00 r, 1p ..a •rl �J .1 tr) Cl) O O% 00 t\ N A w N •-+ T Mri QT M H a� ~ P: Q~' a 00 ao d m� 0 cn —4 r-, 41 E- w ca ea U) 0) a) 7 C O O 41 lr O 41 4-) C O W C 4-1 M H Z aui E aa) aci ir E +%+ � 7 a. cn ao api o a al j cu 4-1 G u d cn >+ >, x 4.1 C E o i a �.1 00 •14 •n c0 rn 0) O rn G a) E CA ca u O ur O C C 4-+ Q' C 7 • ; C w C O y.J $4 w w a) w m O ,4 u O O C 4.J (1) O o' O O V1 d 04 d A P4 E U En d U U M 0 w U W U b d O 40 x N D v w H V c0 M C 41 O O O O O O O O O A O 41 y O O O Co O O O O O U C u O O , O O O O O O O 6141 d O O v1 W1 c+1 v1 O OCD O V Uh ON CW)h 0 Ln f w y. Cy!1 7 00 O\ 00 M O% ? -4 "1>r7 "4 a) .T O O c+1 00 .T fn WAt 1 w O cri w 00 O O O rl A N �O t�1 c0 U1 cv; O W 0 t!} Lnc+1 O N `O 49. Pq A iCJ .enc cn 00 N .� W Oi O ON %o O O .T cn 00 ai► U > iJ d u'1 O P'1 c''1 h m "-I u iJ en 00 �o Cl) Lf) -4 -4 cf1 co O A �O m Lf1 00 N -48 O O O � O -� -i N �O D+ L! Pay U U E esr \T co O O o O O O O O pq GZN 4 a o o Ln o 0 0 -T C D 1; n %0 cn cn O N �-4 h O � ppyy O � •-+ •--� � O� M O co O O O O O O h O yl "1\ O O O O O O %o O C (D1 00 O O O O O O %o O %O W ccU O O Lr; O V1 O 00 O 00 CA 0 M h .� NCD <1 t, 44 00 M d 1.4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w "4 X91 O O O O O O O O O VVc/1� •� `.4 41 O O Vl W ul c!1 O O O `i Ia O Ln -7 h Oi h h l!1 M 00 E+ 40* 7 c0 fZ C7 a) 1+ Nbo to i y ,, r- H W O U) C C W M � (t) a) A Lti] O ►+ O C to O W d +3 a) •-i afWiO O +1 c0 LJ +1 ca VI 0 PS4 U N 4 .-+ -) U C -4 C .0 a� C 0) C 41 cn E+ ca u Q) a ca v cn a) E+ - d C N a d 4-1 e ++ 0 a ., y oo d O oG 4 C u d w --) w >, k 41 C E O .m oo ar 00 d :5 41 41 w Ia -4 -+ a � %o +� ,C -,q -I ca +j 0 V) C a) E 4.) .14 CO um O C o R G 010 = W C O .o w N w O ea O O O C 4.J 0) O C 0 orA as wm = U U U ca 0w U w ti ps y � U U d d + Z w w O U c0 H C i•) o O O o O O O O QU � m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l�] U O FrT�li7 w O CD 0 CN N CN ,~ O O W GJ W N Q� m O O O O O O WW N N � iOJ tH M q U Rqq7 +� U1 � 04 O 12, 000 co o� t O O "A U iJ O d41 Cd r7 y Vto w A o ul Ln o O O O O O q ri %O ON U 004 U UE �r r► �• w a zf U N "Z� � 000 O O O O O O -W E O O O O O t O rl 10\ O O � O U1 O � U1 w ^ O n N . N N q O� 64. M R7 U •-' 04 O 000 O O O O o O on 0 0\o0 0 0 0 0 0 O FQ r0l CD o^ N N N to N 00 00 ~ C.' O O O O O O O O �� O O O O O O O O O 0 4 O O U1 O U1 o O O V� HN O O N Ul c'1 6 1+ O te. ai► H U U GL a _ 41 G w w W pFC�� O c w O w 0u 0ai •14 A F5 O O 41 -W • 1 m w w W U -+ � ..'1144 w 4+ U C C +-1 y C a) O 41 Cl) H cb U w c0 U En a) F N G N G. W a) 4-J r= aJ 7 A. to oo w O cx 41 C U a) r-i $, >N.K JJ O 6 O / •14 oo (1) 00 O 4-j 41 W ►+ •ri •14 GL �o �+ ._ •r+ —1 ca m w C m E U w O C C C O b G $4 i+ a) w ca O O O O 41a) O v 0 ocn as a � v U U m o.a U w �-, C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 A T T A C H M E N T B -39- 1 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ■ V C� / N ^ N = m m J .D P •O r �/1 m m P aD .a m / m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m / F eFe 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m e O Z i •e �n m m m m s a m o� .e n �+ r .o <_ m n m m Ca I 1 f 1 � �!1 m N �(1 .•1 .•t .fl N 1� \ m V1 ■ to 1 �D a N J .p f•1 n r A .- A .� 1 Y m 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ■ O F r m m m Is m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w � i _ .o .o m m ,o P �n .o I•+ .o n m m m m ■ / N .n .D ao n � m a T �n a� m r� N m 1 to 1 r OV / •^• J ■ 1 w m a0 m Ia C-D m W M Io m m m ■ O r a0 aD ap m m ao w m_ w_ m_ ao m ap r O 1 n \ o m \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 N r N N N_ / �••� 1 N eM J a \ .•f e•f .O .p \ .p J \ \ 1 1 ••• m m m m m m m m m m m m m m / 11 Ib 10 GD IQ Ib ID - - DD - - - - - lo 14 a0 1 U � a0 m ' 1 F / e'I n d d \ n n .D .O .D .O d .O •D P P � P P 1 Cl 1 r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m -.o m m u0 a0 -D co aD Ib a0 m aD aD 1 O ■ a0 a0 a0 DD aD aD S O a0 m GD a0 O o0 W i0 a0 aD ► - ► -- m m m m IM N m m m N N m N / V 1 \ N \ \ N N N \ f•1 J1 e•1 I.1 N J1 V1 Jt \ V� �O 1 • a r ••� -• •- r r r r m m m m in m m is m m m to i F i 07 <o m_ aD ap /p a0 CMI oOp a�D aOD m .oD_ m_ m_ W_ m 'S 00 / Z 1 \ \ O 1 P (O O �. 1 • f 1 _ r r ... r ... .-. m m m m m m m m m m m m m eZe V 1 r O c6 cc w < N W 1 r op < h N > 1 ■ E m z y bj ofi o g yo o z o e 5 o<< z aa. 39 d 6 F C < R rC W w U O S cv r z 1 / 1 d ■V �• < F Z V m F fL U F < Z Z C9 V] Z :Dy' z U, Y 1 1 Yi S F z S c6 caV Z N < Z Y < i y i Y O > i cc *Id S Z O •O'• V F .V. N cLi ■ r z o 0 o m m u z z m z o z� _ pyG o z o 11] rl- m .o m ry O yyZ F a F {.] F = >o C 1 1 v O _< P N m i N y i O] oz P.1 z a 6 Z Y O'] Z Z S F Q] V O O U 7Cp U a 4] •.] a m z d rf] m Z m z O g 1 1 = V y f•' ` U V F / 1 z a m < v z 1 / F < O r 0 Z d V \ O V N tD V 2 D• n] �] O Z .] a .Z. d Z d m ■ 1 O H F U v F O O d a+ a -7 O Cp e] / 1 d d w << F U O C6 .. d aG pyG OG O W G. D F V h IA N m m _] ca .moi H F m F d F u] > O F a d Z - d > ► / Z O > > V p�z O .] > > 1 1 OO] W N nZ+ F O D w 7 d N O Z -.] h V U < ■ 1 V a C a N U < W V {G a 6: D U D Z h d h a d aL c0 m •O .D •a0 ■ S. 1 .O • A a P m ZO ao / a ■ N n a d m ■o\ 1 v � �. N ... a �n .o n a P m r � � � � � .. °� n � n r ► F [ m m -m- to m m m m m m m to Is m m m m m m 0 s m m m m m m m m m M �D G m m m m e m e m e m m m m m m m m m m m m _ a m a P Q N m m m m m m m e e m e m m m e e m m e m m 1 r m W m e n m d 0 y m e o m c3 O m a z u r F � 0 = d IG z Y7 ft(, Ir m m d U W L d i a > a s d o IL y y� F W y W U P • N N N N N N N n n n • Ir -- -- " -- -- ---- -- ---- ------------ Ir W rn B In P B h 'C ^ m .r r1 DC ® 8 N %C M 1 M M M m Ir M o ac v N v v L n Ic a vv N to CT M ^ 1•� v v .Nti r--I o v r n rr x 11 W n r{ -- -- - - -------- ------ -- 11 n Ir n V• 11 11 Z 11 N 11 n p 11 N r. 11 Q '1 0 J1 1 11 Z 11 = O 11 p II W = O O W II p N n O b W Ir M H• <Y ------ ------------ ---- C) C)1 " O 11 O 11 V N 11 1, -- " -- -- -- ---- -------- ---- ---- 11 Z p n P CP m P M Ip O .-•. M W V1 1.0 h .L M M M m N N1 N N M \ •O m y N n U 11 v ^ 10 v 00 I!1 r1 _ COS ------ -------- ------- 11 CL: H- N O• S M m s m ® ^ m M lc:)11 - N 11 m m P m V m Q = h P 4 I. • W n a m m m v .OV, -•.• m iN 11 - Y Ir v 11 n cc 11 p n V N N W N N •--• O O 11 O J CC V Ir O d m m m W = m W m OC _W n V N v v P O N W m S .-.• -Z • 11 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m m m Z i W 11 d Ir m m m m m O m m m m m S U 11 = 11 m m m m m m m m m m m V �--• Ir O rl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ u - V n ♦p 14) v v v v m P %J� m %p -_- •-•a r1 N B m ® m m P P ® B r9 1tj r, • Y 11cc co O O Ir O n O 'co m m co m CL O p Ir \ \ ^ �� ^ \ \ \ \ \ \ V n 6 N N h C M h \10 19 _ 11 • „ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m m m P 9 Z 11 �_ m m m m m m m m m m m m m 11 Z N Co \ m m m m m m m m m m m C \ \ \ \ \ \CPI ell Ol co \ \ \ _\ \ 11 G V N N N h h N m 9 .--1 m .•-n 11 II \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 11 • O n ^ ^ � ^ m m m m P m P II ti- II m ob f9 m m ry r9 ra m t9 ------ -------- ----- 11 11 N = cc 11 11 L7 Ir 11 Z 11 11 11 V O 1� W 11 N W W J N rr V N mcc •--- 1!1 W Y N t N d Z II { IC S - ICV, OC J U LAJ NC1 cn.c W = Z O = N K 0� Z p Y N 11 V 11 j W Z U L7 ^ J W J J M W W W 11 Z < .O N C r p 11 N { 1 0 ." C1 V O 11 S W N b W 11C W OC V n '1 N d' W OC > { W t O W 0 = W Ir OC O Z W 4C ac m V p d 11 •I < ^ �• N OC G W p r W 11 n i N J p W < W O W OC Y Z Z V OC V' N 11 W OC W U Li or N a' � Z W < J t til U �I�� Z co N O N Vdl U V N W 1+IIN Ir n 11 Ir CPI -------------- C 11 11 -•� h Pr'1 IA /n h N•r �� lI- N � m m m � � � -•-1 •-•1 F'1 h h 1J, 1•V _ � 11 N ---1 ti rY ••-I •••r r••I ti � --•I r-1 � r1 .••1 r-r .--I _ _ _ _ _ _ O v 11 O n h M y Le1 b n m P to M q n d 11 O- rr .-•/ rl r-1 r1 W u R NI n N 11 If N I 11 11 n 11 11 1 11 11 0o u m u N II n rn u u p u u n u u u II 11 � O 11 11 Z 11 11 II II E•1 a n U n n 11 11 n n O n n U n U � p n u II 11 11 n If u w n ii a H ii O n n n � u o• II U vHJ II � u W 11 O II II r-1 II II 11 W 11 11 E•1 11 ' !1 O if 11 II y 11 II W 11 II II 11 � II 11 11 ii q U y ii O u N 11 zif Uxd O 11 FI (� F II 11 G O W II II 7. II 11 11 ii W o � u � UO .�1 u u n -- -- -- a -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- n n n _x n ao O ii 6 H 00 ii -a OU Nn n -- -- -- if -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- ^- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- n n n n n u u u ill 1 li W ri ri x U n n �•i u n u n AIt If n C7 H 11 C7 11 Q� Lo�] II II S v M 11 O 11 O V 00 op 11 O tl 2 OD It it ti a In A u U u W O N O tl In tl En 6 pC ii A Is 4 O W to it u - II M 11 II k. 11 (s� II 11 • q 0 11 F-I O O U 11 it 101 ►•I rl � 11 11 6 p ii ii .d N e+1 In ap 0� O rl N cn In �p n 'i -4 C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 A T T A C H M E N T C -44- i� n .c 1, N W E W 1. O W V � �O 11 \ QJ G� 11 11 � 11 L7 It V1 11 �. 11 Z 11 11 O 11 W 1 N 11 4J Z 11 D W � • Ir 1• U U J N O O W Q B E] � Q U O J �J LO ►-• ~ O Cn Cr• m �o NO 1• ---- " -- 1� J U N 8 O • W 3E: rl Q O 6 C! JJ U� d U O CT Cn 11 11 N P�1 - r � Q } t••I nl � Q C O u o� u Q - 3 i • 4: O d J Q U cx: N C W G: U K N ID z co co u v r_ J n. } J W v -- - - - m 2 G N o c-A o C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y J U S T I C E P R O G R A M PROGRESS REPORT NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 1988 A T T A C H M E N T D -46- k,YYA.RM&CMCDVII Vq^AC. WEST COUN':Y JUSTICE CENTER DATE Sept 25 , 1988 Q , - Z Z < J OD co 91, E f � a � i E - i - k Q-0 m' m W Q \ r x CD lz O 3 m ca ca as m m m m - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- � 4' O N fK N < N < CY O O to u T of J � ap T ! ! E 1n Ol ! i 46 4b ! i ! ! i ! ! i i ! �7 T ! ! i ! ! Z << ! ! ! i !qh G ! ! ! ! ! ! _ N ! ! ! ! ! ! .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ! .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ! .. ! .. ! .. i .. .. N N Nr4 ! ! ! ! ! E W rn vi► w +!► i t H G W ! a ! ! ! WW �+ 4 % i i Ii E O LA ! ! i i +k ! ! ! J CO ! ! ! i _ H ! ! ! ! ^ H (a� iqk ! ! ! J lJ N ! ! ! i C 4k � Z z n ei► x $ $ M o z U x rr +r +r ar +r O -• v F ! ! ! ! to H O p ! ! ! ! W aj O F SU c0 W a am � •yi a0 G .Wd to W W n ! i ! V1 coo co W Z O O ~ a ! a!i U a+ G1 464 ! 00 en 'O O 33 W p F � v!r +!a a N w w W S i ! ! ! ! -- -- -- -- -- -- O -- -- -- -- -- -- - - V N 4 O w J C U S a f d N N % taL .•+ ! -- AAA... � C W i W fA i V1 < ^ i + N ry .. i .. .. ! .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .� J-� Q F i � ! �•, C F ((sr�7 O CA U L 4h C�0 Z U N < vii. 4b ' V F u < .>.7 CO v!i► '. -+ + ! t o + to 3 VI W N99 [[_ G O M ►r W� to fA = 8 8 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- oc cc CD C) C14 Q` C11 cn N Ai 41 CN cc L ON C14 00 00 04 ON >1 w — 4-J 12. a% co -4 0 1-4 41 7 -4 - 0 m oc C14 CC 4-) Ln �zo En Lr) 00 00 cq 9Q 0-4 rn oz C14 eC ul cq w 0 E- Ln CD r- pq C) Z co cn en 00 E-4 ..... ..... z W ON 0 ---------------------- E-4 0� 04 E-4 0 0 C14 PL4 E- W V) rn Lr) Ln A4 cq C4 CN W 0 r-4 E-4 N � -,f -4 r4 En 00 rA 41 Ln Cl a) Ln ----------------------- ------------ 00 M* B 00 CD 0 Ln N C14 00 ..... ..... co ..... ..... V) tv cr 0) —4 m z &-4 lrl� 0 Im U Z w 1-4 aw m .61 cn 3c > w u u w Ln cr, 0 cn " z C; P9 C) z 0 0 :1 x C/I E-4 > Cl. PC 1 c i Q 0) W w > totn E— L) W 0 W. d E- aa L) L) 0 ZD I E- z A4 go I ar" E- M zz NOILLDfIHJSNOD 0 0 0 E- 0 cn