Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10111988 - 2.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1988 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF SIEMENS MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC. Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification I. RECOMMENDATION Approve the recommendation of the Public Works Director and deny the request from Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. to waive the Countywide Area of Benefit traffic mitigation fee. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT No consequence to the General Fund. Negative action from the Board of Supervisors will result in a loss of $380, 000 in revenue to improve the road system in Central County. III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. , the applicant of Land Use Permit #2005-88 plans to build a medical equipment design, manufacturing and sales operation facility in the North Concord area, outside the Bates Avenue Assessment District. The application was approved by the Zoning Administrator on March 70, 1988. At the same time, a finding was made that the negative declaration of environmental significance was adequate. A notice of determination was posted. However, the determination was challenged which delayed the final approval of the project to June 2, 1988. Continued on attachment: yes Signature: Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee Approve Other: Signature(s) : Action of Board on: October 11, 1988 Approved as Recommended Other x CONTINUED to November 1, 1988 Determination Calendar. Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN x Unanimous (Absent '- ) ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON Ayes: Noes: THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF Absent: Abstain: SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN. Attested Orig. Div. :Public Works (RE) PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD cc: Public Works Director OF SUPERVISORS AND County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MMS:ly BO: 11.t10 By- Ua4--O� 4ow--f-e.� DIOUTY CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OCTOBER 11, 1988 PAGE TWO In the meantime, the Board of Supervisors established the Countywide Area of Benefit and adopted the enabling ordinance (#88-27) to be effective May 15, 1988 . Seimens Medical Laboratories, Inc. , contend that they would have completed the review process and obtained the necessary building permit before May 15, 1988, if they had not been delayed by the "defective negative declaration" . They further assert that the Conditions of Approval (COA) of Land Use Permit #2005-88 does not require them to pay traffic mitigation fees. Seimens further contends that since they are relocating from Walnut Creek, away from a congested area, they should not be assessed a traffic impact fee. Staff recommends that the appeal be denied on the following grounds: 1. The California Environmental Quality Act requires the posting of notice of determination of a negative declaration to allow the public a chance to challenge the findings. The County never guarantees to anyone that there will not be any challenge to the findings. Challenges are routine and are to be expected. 2 . Condition of Approval (CAO) only specifies the special provisions and/or exceptions to the County' s Ordinance Code. The applicant is expected to follow County Ordinances during the development process whether the ordinances are called out in the COA or not. For example, the applicant is expected to follow the latest building code and highway design standard even though they are not mentioned in the COA. 3 . The fact that Seimens is relocating its facility from Walnut Creek is not a relevant argument. The space vacated by Seimens will be occupied by other tenants who will generate trips and impact traffic in Walnut Creek while the new facility in North Concord will generate trips and contribute to the traffic problem in North Concord and in the County. 4 . The adopted Area of Benefit Ordinance requires the payment of the fee prior to issuance of the building permit. This development must abide by the requirement. Failure to enforce this part of the fee ordinance undermines the legality of the ordinance.