Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10041988 - 1.41 y TO, 1- 041 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mark Finucane , Health Services Director FROM: By : Elizabeth A. Spooner , Contracts Administrator Contra Costa DATE'. County Approval of three contracts to continue the Primary Intervention SUBJECT: program (PIP) in Richmond , San Ramon Valley and John Swett Unified School Districts during FY 1988-89 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I . RECOMMENDED ACTION : Approve and authorize the Chairman to exe- cute the following novation contracts on behalf of the County to continue the Primary Intervention Program in three school districts for the period July 1 , 1988 through June 30 , 1989 . Contract Payment Program Location Number Contractor Limits (Elementary School) 24-378-3 Richmond Unified School $19 ,083 Bayview, San Pablo District 24-379-3 San Ramon Valley Unified $ 13 , 859 Bollinger Canyon, School District San Ramon 24-441-2 John Swett Unified School $13 ,095 Hillcrest , Rodeo District Total $46 ,037 Only one contract includes an automatic extension. Contract #24-441-2 with John Swett Unified School District includes a three-month automatic extension from July 1 , 1989 through September 30 , 1989 in the amount of $1 , 637 . II . FINANCIAL IMPACT : The monies dispensed in these contracts are State dollars received by the County via contracts with the State Department of Mental Health. These monies are allocated from the State Department of Mental Health' s Primary Prevention Fund.` The Board approved receipt of these funds via State- County contract approved by the Board on September 13 , 1988. _ County State Grantor Payment Number ID Number Limits School District 29-445-3 88-79113 $21 , 786.00 Richmond 29-446-3 88-79111 $14 , 162. 97 San Ramon 29-451-2 88-79126 $13 , 426. 80 John Swett Total $49 ,375 . 77 CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE' ' ► ✓ . RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDAT O OF BOARD COM ITTEE APPROVE OTHER I SIGNATURE S : ACTION OF BOARD Y11C APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER , VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE //SHOWN. � y cc: Health Services (Contracts) ATTESTED 7� /T/ U Risk Management PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Auditor-Controller SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Contractor M3 / - DY_ �'Y _ ,DEPUTY 82 7 83 Primary Intervention Program Board Order Page 2 A 50% local match (generated jointly by County Mental Health and each school district) is required in each contract with the State for each of the three years of State funding. Mental Health' s share of this in-kind contribution for all three PIP programs totals $28 ,395 or 25% of the total cost ($112 ,533) of these three projects . This County in-kind contribution includes an allocation of a specific number of hours of current staff time already budgeted in the Alcohol/Drug Abuse/Mental Health budget , plus mileage and administrative/overhead costs , so no new monies are required . Grant monies received flow through the Health Services Department to the school districts via subcontracts to finance project staff hired by the school district and project operating expenses . A total of $3 ,339 in grant monies remains with the County (a) to off-set the cost of County staff participation (mandated) in State PIP training events ($970) and (b) to fund specific regional coordination/consultation services provided to the State by the Alcohol/Drug Abuse/Mental Health Division ( $2 ,369) . The 1988-89 Fiscal Year is the third year of three-year State grants for both the Richmond and San Ramon PIP projects . This is the second of an expected three-year State grant for the John Swett PIP project . III . REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND : National surveys have shown that about 30% of all American children experience moderate to severe school adjustment problems . Left unattended, such problems worsen , and in many cases , result in extensive human and social costs . In recent years , a body of data has grown demonstrating that programs based on systematic early detection and screening backed by prompt intervention are effec- tive in remediating early adjustment problems and in preventing the need for later , more specialized and costly public services . California' s Primary Prevention Project is modeled after the Primary Mental health Prevention Project in Rochester , New York. The University of Rochester has conducted extensive research over the past 25 years on the Rochester Model , including outcome studies , and the evidence is clear that the program works . In 1985 the Legislature enacted AB 1934 (Bates ) which created the Mental Health Primary Prevention Fund in the State Treasury as a stable mechanism to partially finance three-year demonstra- tion Primary Prevention Projects . A joint proposal by County Mental Health and interested school districts is required to secure funding. County Mental Health is also required to pro- vide clinical consultation/ training to grant recipients and to participate in the State ' s annual training conference. For a relatively small in-kind investment , the County in collaboration with schools has the opportunity to provide a proven, cost- effective prevention/early intervention program. All three PIP projects are enthusiastically supported by local school administrators , teachers , parents , students and local civic and service organizations . This fiscal year these three PIP projects will screen a minimum of 500 students for school adjustment problems and individually serve 175 or more children and their families .