HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01191988 - 1.36 File: 000-8711/A. 1. 1
To. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: BARTON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICESContraCosta
@ .Mry
DATE: January 19, 1988 Ir
SUBJECT: APPROVING PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR REMODELING JUVENILE HALL FACILITIES
AT MARTINEZ AND BYRON FOR PROBATION DEPARTMENT (WPE517)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. APPROVE the following firms as highly qualified to
provide architectural services for Remodeling Juvenile
Hall Facilities at Martinez and Byron for Probation
Department, listed in order of preference, as recommended
by the County selection committee: Steven E. Harriman
AIA & Assoc. , Walnut Creek, first; Harrison/Fox
Architects, Pleasant Hill, second; and John Hernikl
Architect, Walnut Creek, third.
B. AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to ( 1)
negotiate an appropriate agreement with the firm listed
first for architectural services at a price which the
Director determines to be fair and reasonable to the
County, and ( 2) if a satisfactory agreement cannot be
negotiated, to formally terminate negotiations with the
first firm and undertake negotiations with the other
firms, in the order of preference determined by the
selection committee, until an appropriate agreement is
reached.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Authorizing negotiations will have no significant financial
impact. Any agreement resulting from these negotiations will
be submitted to the Board for approval, and, if approved,
will encumber funds from the 25% match capital budget which
the Board has established for this project. The State of
California, Department of Youth Authority, has awarded Contra
Costa County a 75% match in the amount of $482, 895 for this
project.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND:
A. On November 16, 1987, the Department of Youth Authority,
State of California, notified the County Chief Probation
Officer that $482,895 has been allocated to Contra Costa
County from the County Correctional Facilities Capital
Expenditure Bond Act of 1986, Proposition 52.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _%_ YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
51GNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON January 19 , 1988 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
General Services Department
cc: ATTESTED January 19 , 1988
Architectural Division
Accounting PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Auditor-Controller
Architect (Via AD)
M382/7-83 BY .DEPUTY
B. Architectural interviews were held on November 20, 1987.
The County Architectural Selection committee has
recommended that the Director of General Services seek
authorization to negotiate an appropriate agreement for
architectural services with the candidate ranked first
and, if negotiations fail, to negotiate with the other
firms in the order of preference established by the
committee.
C. The management and professional staff for the firm ranked
first is 28.6 percent female.
D. The County must proceed with an agreement for
architectural services because it does not have
sufficient staff to provide the services.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this recommendation is not approved, the County will risk
loss of a 75% State Grant for this project. The remodeling
project is primarily life and health safety related.
00011B01. 04B
BB:RDH:pg
Page 2 of 2