Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02021988 - S.1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Sunne Wright McPeak } ra Introduced January 26 , 1988 , for CM7LQ DATE* Action on February 2 , COJ .`J 1988 � V SUBJECT: Coalition to Restore Safety at Work Initiative SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION The Board of Supervisors support the "Coalition to Restore Safety at Work" and its drive to collect enough signatures to place an initiative on the ballot to restore Cal-OSHA,, our state' s respected Occupational Safety and Health Administration. BACKGROUND In 1987, the Governor cut the funding in the state budget for Cal-OSHA in the private sector which protected people from death, illness and injuries. It was argued that workers would be protected just as well by Federal-OSHA, yet the facts prove that not to be true. For instance: • During the three months from July to September, 1987, Federal-OSHA conducted 54 inspections of workplace accidents. Cal-OSHA performed 761 such inspections during the same period in 1986 . The reason for the decline is that Federal-OSHA only inspects if a worker dies or if five or more are hospitalized. Cal-OSHA must inspect every occupational accident. • Cal-OSHA could immediately shut down dangerous work sites if imminent hazards threatened lives. Federal- OSHA must go to court before it can act. Cal-OSHA inspectors could respond to anonymous phone tips on violations. Federal-OSHA only investigtes when formal written and signed complaints are filed. Labor, business, health and environmental groups agree Cal-OSHA did a better job of protecting people at work. i Cancer-causing materials and poisons are in the air. Toxics which harm workers often don' t stop at plant gates. Nearby communities can also be contaminated. Cal-OSHA protected Californians from 170 harmful chemicals which the federal government doesn' t even regulate. And federal standards for 97 other dangerous toxics are inferior to protections Cal-OSHA enforced. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT; XX YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON 14 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT �— AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN. AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE FEB 2 D 1988 1ATE SHOWN. . cc: County, Administrator ATTESTED - oard Members' PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Central Labor Council SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY �/ ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 Coalition to Restore Safety at Work Page 2 • Only Cal-OSHA banned use of the infamous short-handled hoe which crippled generations of California farm workers. • Eliminating Cal-OSHA will save the state $6 . 8 million a year . . . out of a state budget of $42 billion a year. Cal-OSHA only costs 25 cents for every Californian. • The initiative to restore Cal-OSHA is not a tax increase. It won' t mean more government regulation -- just the same higher standard of protection Californians once enjoyed. • In fact, Cal-OSHA saved money. A spokesman for a major insurance company testified that a 1 percent rise in workers' compensation claims could cost business $50 million a year in increased insurance premiums. Who pays for job-related accidents and illnesses? Business pays; and when business pays, so do consumers. • Cal-OSHA also saved the taxpayers money. Fewer deaths and injuries meant fewer disabled workers and destitute families trying to survive on Medi-Cal and welfare.