Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02231988 - S.8 s BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Supervisor Tom Torlakson Contra Costa DATE: February 23, 1988 County SUBJECT: NO SMOKING POLICY FOR AMTRAK SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDED ACTION: Request the County Administrator to send a letter in behalf of the Board of Supervisors to Amtrak requesting a "no smoking" policy on Amtrak intrastate lines. Request that Supervisor Nancy Fanden, as our representative on the Amtrak Task Force, convey the Board' s position to the task force. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During a recent Amtrak ride with my daughter, I noted that Amtrak does not exercise a "no smoking" policy on its trains. I expressed my concern about this to Amtrak. Arthur Lloyd, a representative of Amtrak, indicated that Amtrak must follow Federal law which supersedes state law, but they are looking into a policy. . (Please refer to attached letters. ) TT:gro Attachment CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER x Requesting a policy of smoking only on specified cars on Amtrak. intrastate lines. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: ATTESTED February 23 , 1988 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator M382/7-83 BY DEPUTY Tom Toriakson 300 East Leland Rd. Supervisor, District Five - - Suite 100 Su p �i Pittsburg, California 94565 Contra Costa Count �_ = s Y (415)427-8138 Board of Supervisorsv January 11, 1988 Arthur Lloyd, Director Amtrak Western Office of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs 1 California Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111-5434 Dear Mr. Lloyd: May daughter and I are still raving about our first Amtrak train ride on December 31 from Antioch to Oakland! We also enjoyed the very efficient and quick shuttle bus ride to San Francisco. Both of us were thrilled with the experience! I was particularly pleased at how quick the "commute" was--once we got onto the train. The conductor on our way in to Oakland gave an excellent "tour guide" narrative of interesting sites to see and provided us with important historical facts. Ever since this ride, my daughter and I have been telling all of our friends and relatives about this experience and are encouraging more people to take train rides. In fact, in talking to fellow club members of the Delta Kiwanis Club in Antioch, we would like to invite an Amtrak representative to come to our meeting as a guest speaker to tell us about some of your other train experiences such as the ride to Reno that we have heard so much about. I would appreciate your getting back to me with more information about the availability of an Amtrak representative to attend our meeting. There are only two minor points of criticism that I would like to share. One is that the train was about 40 minutes behind schedule on the way to Oakland. Also, as newcomers to the Amtrak experience, we were disconcerted to find no signs posting the train schedule and not much of a train station at all. I am separately writing the City of Antioch to suggest that they provide a bus stop-type shelter of some kind perhaps in cooperation with your company. Mr. Arthur Lloyd January 11, 1988 Page TWO The second issue related to cigarette smoke present in your cars. I hope you will be considering the full implementation of the new state law which, as I understand it, prohibits smoking in passenger train cars and airplanes. The health as well as the comfort of non-smoking passengers is at stake. I am sure that smokers could have a designated place to go to such as the lounge if they needed to have a cigarette. It would make the ride even more comfortable and enjoyable to have clean air to breath! Thank you for providing such a good service. I hope you will not only continue it, but expand it. Sincerely, Tom Torlakson TT:gro National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Public Affairs, One California Street, Suite 1250, San Francisco, CA 94111-5466 Amtrak j RECEIVED ,�/'t tJ 2 ..// 9 1988 January 28 , 1988 Hon. Tom Torlakson, Supervisor Contra Costa County 300 East Leland Road - Suite #100 Pittsburg, California 94565 Dear Supervisor Torlakson : Thank you for your very nice letter of January 11th. My apologies for the delay in reply but I have been out of the office on business most of the past two weeks. I have the eleven western states to cover so am not in my office all the time. I would be pleased to talk to your Kiwanis club in Antioch and tell about Amtrak and its .history, present operations and future. Just give me as much advance time as possible as I have a fairly full schedule. My calendar in the next few months has me in and out of town but I will be gone the first two weeks in April on vacation. As to the station sign and shelter : Amtrak has little or no capital funding so we are unable to do little more th an stop in Antioch. Most cities do erect station shelters at their expense and we will, of course, work with them. Antioch is a separate story, however, for when we started service the Southern Pacific/Santa. Fe merger was in the works and if it had happened we did think we would have to move to the SP line through Antioch. This now doesn' t appear likely so a station shelter is in order. Smoking is a tough one for we must follow Federal law which supersedes state law. We are, however, looking into a policy along the lines you suggest and, perhaps , no smoking at all on intrastate trains such as the SAN JOAQUIN. S ' xfcereJ ; Arthur L. Lloyd, Director Public Affairs - West AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER