Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02231988 - 2.2 G1 a a iro: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS . t FROM; VVl tra Phil Batchelor, County Administrator Costa DATE: February 23, 1988 COJ' "-' SUBJECT: Refunding Outstanding Bond and Certificate Issues SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 88/100 In order to reflect current market conditions and to take steps to help alleviate the financial concerns regarding the 1988-89 budget, it is recommended that the Board approve the following: 1. Approve .the staff recommendation to not exercise the second part ( $70 million taxable issue) of the County' s short-term borrowing program for 1987-88 . 2 . Authorize staff to explore the feasibility of refunding existing County bond and certificate of participation obligations (Capital .Projects 1 through 6, Telecommunications Project and Series A Bonds) . If these projects can be insured and then refunded, the size of the projects could be decreased and the cash savings to the County could total as much as $600 ,000 a year if all projects could be refunded. 3 . Authorize County staff and consultants to prepare and distribute necessary documents and take other actions, necessary to issue certificates of participation for the refunding of any of the above-mentioned obligations which can be financially cost justified. 4 . Authorize staff and consultants to travel to New York to meet with the bond insurance companies to ascertain which of these projects can be refunded to obtain a AAA rating and ensure a more favorable pricing on .refunding these issues., FINANCIAL IMPACT it is not desirable at this time to consider issuing a $70 million taxable issue and assuming the corresponding risk with the likelihood of a return on investment of less than $133 ,000. The risk is not justified considering the possible return and the uncertainty of current market conditions. If the County is able to refund all of the six capital projects that were issued over the last four years and obtain a AAA rating by insuring these CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES ' SIGNATURE: � RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S : _ ACTION OF BOARD ON (:'PROVED AS RECOMMENDED IV OTHER _ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: County Counsel ATTESTED 'FEB 2 3 1988 Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Treasurer-Tax Collector SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RESOLUTION 88/100L, ��%��A� M382/7-83 BY ,DEPUTY — 1 r issues, it will be able to realize up to a $600,000 savings per year after consideration of reissuance and insurance costs. The alternative of insuring issues to get a AAA rating has only become available recently due to the much improved financial standing of Contra Costa County. BACKGROUND Staff efforts to cope with increasing costs and limited revenues require that extraordinary efforts be made to maintain County services. As part of this effort staff contacted the County Financial Advisors concerning the short-term borrowing program and the management of the current outstanding issues of long-term securities. The current refunding proposal was developed from these meetings. The concept proposed is to replace the outstanding debt with a new certificate issue insured by a bond insurance company. The insurance will allow the reserve fund required in the old issues to be released and applied to the new debt. The resulting debt service, because of the high rating given to insured issues, application of reserves to lower the total of the new issue and the favorable market conditions provide substantial annual savings over the current debt service requirements. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION The County will not be able to realize savings estimated to be up to $600,000 per year.