Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02231988 - 2.1 TO: �" BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR Cwtra County Administrator Cosa DATE: February 12,' 1988 cjo`'" '•1 SUBJECT; REPORT FROM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ON CONSOLIDATING THE MARSHAL'S OFFICE INTO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Accept this report from the County Administrator on consolidating the Ma�h�l's Office into the Sheriff's Department, as recommended by the Superior and Municipal. Court Judges the Sheriff-Coroner, and the Marshal's Office, and take the following actions: 1. Approve consolidation plan, effective July 1, 1988, as recommended by the Superior and Municipal Court Judges, the Sheriff-Coroner, .and the Marshal's Office. 2. Request Assemblyman William Baker to amend AB 3014 to include the Sheriff-Marshal consolidation language as proposed by the above-cited parties. 3. Direct the County Administrator, Director of Personnel, Sheriff-Coroner and Marshal to take necessary interim steps to ensure a smooth transition to the new organizational arrangement on July 1, 1988 and to submit required personnel actions to the Board of Supervisors for approval. 4. Effective July 1, 1988, transfer 48 authorized positions in the Marshal's Office to the Sheriff's Department Budget Unit 0255, cancel the following authorized positions: 9 deputy sheriffs (Class 6XWA), 5 clerks - experienced level (Class JWXB), 1 lieutenant (Class 6XHA), and add Assistant Sheriff-Court Services, and Captain-Court Services. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Consolidation of the Marshal's Office into the Sheriff's Department, as recommended above, will result in a cancellation of a number of positions and in an estimated annual savings of $350,942. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND: In a letter dated November 2, 1987, Richard Rainey, Sheriff=Coroner, and Mark Simons, Judge, . Mt. Diablo Municipal Court indicated that a plan for a Sheriff/Marshal merger of bailiff, civil process and court holding functions would be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors. That plan and the implementing legislation has been developed and approved by the Sheriff-Coroner and the Superior and Municipal Court judges. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDA IONOA COMMITTEE _ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE s : ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS REC,7MMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS ^^ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES; NOES. AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. FEBQ CC: ATTESTED B 2 V 1988 See list of- copies on Page 2 - - PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DEPUTY M382/7-83 BY 0 _.4. , Report from County Administrator on Consolidating the Marshal's Office Into the Sheriff's Department February 12, 1988 Page 2 The County Administrator's Office conducted a feasibility study of consolidating court-"related services in Contra Costa County (July 24, 1986). The Sheriff-Coroner and Municipal Court judges developed alternate proposals and presented them to the Board on October 3, 1986. Supervisor Tom Powers met with a Task Force on Marshal/Sheriff Consolidation, consisting of representatives from the Superior Court and Municipal Court, regarding these proposals, discussed organizational concepts and options, and began the negotiating process. The Sheriff-Coroner and Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court Judges Association developed the specifics of the final plan and legislation currently before you. (February 8, 1988). The plan calls for the transfer of 48 positions in the Marshal's Department to the Sheriff's Department. There will be created a court services division within the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department to serve the Superior and Municipal Courts. There is a proposed reduction in personnel positions arising from the merger for an estimated savings of $350,942. The County Administrator's Office study had indicated a merger could save an estimated $825,436. The differences in the proposed plan and the County Administrator's Office study are: 1. Keeping the Branch Offices open (to maintain local access to these court services). 2. Maintaining four sergeant positions (one in each municipal court district for supervision and court security). 3. Keeping an additional clerical position and eliminating the lower, rather than higher level, clerical positions. 4. Upgrading the Marshal to Assistant Sheriff. 5. Upgrading the lieutenant to captain. 6. Keeping a captain in the Services Division. The proposed plan includes provision for a Court Services Oversight Committee consisting of three Municipal Court judges and two Superior Court judges in even-numbered years and three Superior Court judges and two Municipal Court judges in odd-numbered years. The Oversight Committee approves transfers, staffing levels, recommended budget, and security plans through the Assistant Sheriff, Court Services Division. With approval of this plan and implementing legislation, the Marshal's Office will be eliminated effective July 1, 1988 and its functions transferred to the Sheriff's Department, resulting in the elimination of 15 positions (9 deputy sheriffs, 1 lieutenant and 5 clerks - experienced level). The projected annual savings will result in a reduction of the Marshal's Office fiscal year 1988-89 budget allocation and the transfer of the reduced amount to the Sheriff's Department. A further review of the staffing levels and operation of court services should be conducted after there is some experience with the consolidated operation. cc: Presiding Judge, Superior Court Presiding Judges, Municipal Courts Judge Mark Simons, President Municipal Court Judges Association Sheriff-Coroner Marshal Superior Court Administrator County Municipal Court Administrator Deputy Sheriffs' Association Deputy Marshals Association Local 2700 CAO-Justice System Programs Personnel Department