Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02231988 - 1.105 a File: 250-8728/A. 1. 1. t BOAkD OF SUPERVISORS T. Cont FRa�: BARTON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES �,t.JIJI llra Costa DATE'. February 23 , 1988 C�, 11Y SUBJECT: APPROVING CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR REMODELING AT 725 COURT STREET, MARTINEZ (0928-WH219B) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) a BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I . RECOMMENDED ACTION 'A. APPROVE a Consulting Services Agreement with Armas Sootaru, Architect, 620 Las Juntas Street, Martinez, for architectural services for Remodeling at 725 Court Street, Martinez. B. AUTHORIZE the Director . of General Services to execute the Agreement and to issue written authorizations for extra work, provided that the cumulative total extra cost for all such authorizations shall not exceed $25,000. 00. The Agreement will be effective February 16, - 1988, and will provide for full architectural services, with a payment limit for basic services of $44,000. 00, which amount shall not be exceeded without prior, written authorization by the Director of General Services. II . FINANCIAL IMPACT. Funds in the capital account established for the project are sufficient to cover the amount encumbered by this agreement. III . REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND. A. Now that construction of the A.F. Bray Courts Building, R. 1020 Ward Street, is nearing completion, it is necessary to prepare design and construction documents for remodeling certain' areas in the old courthouse at 725 Court Street. These areas will be vacated by a Superior Court, part of the Court Administrator' s functions and the Law Library when they move to the new courts building. The vacant space left at 725 Court Street will permit expansion of the District Attorney, Court Administrator and County Clerk areas. x1�CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE; RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S : y ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF. SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TARN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED'ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. . cc: Administrator' s Office ATTESTED FEB 23 1988 County Counsel ---- -- Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF G. S. Accounting SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Architectural Division Architect (Via A.D. ) BY ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 III.REASONS FOR RECOMEENDATIONS/BACKGROUND: (continued) B. In late 1984, the County Architectural Selection Committee interviewed architects for remodeling 725 Court Street for additional courtrooms. The Committee ranked Armas Sootaru, Architect, first. However, before Mr. Sootaru could complete design documents, the remodeling for additional courtrooms was abandoned in favor of building a new courts building. Another architect was retained to design the new building. C. Last year, Mr. Sootaru, was requested to prepare a new program for remodeling 725 Court Street as required to accommodate the expansion described in paragraph A above. This program has been reviewed and approved by all department' s involved and by the County Administrator' s Office. D. Negotiations have been completed and an appropriate agreement for the architectural services required to implement the remodeling program is ready to sign. The agreement describes full architectural services, including Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, and Bidding and Construction phases of service: E. The County must proceed with this agreement for architectural services because it does not have sufficient staff to provide the services. 25028B02. 08B BB:RDH:pg:dp Page 2 of 2