HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10271987 - 2.4 2 . 4
-THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on _October 27 , 1987 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson, McPeak
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Method for Appointment of Director to the
Mt. Diablo Hospital District
Supervisor McPeak commented on the number of communications
she has received from intested parties urging the appointment of a
resident of Pleasant Hill to the Board of Directors of the Mt.
Diablo Hospital District. She proposed setting a time on November
3 , 1987, to interview candidates living in Pleasant Hill who would
be interested as well as qualified for the appointment.
Supervisor Schroder advised that he would be interested in
appointing a Director who has a business background. He noted that
representation on the Hospital District Board is on a at-large
basis and not subject to appointment from specific regions within
the District.
Following discussion, the Board agreed to open up the appli-
cation process to qualified candidates living in the Pleasant Hill
area with November 3 , 1987, at 11 a.m. fixed as the time to receive
a 5-minute presentation by each candidate relative to their quali-
fications for appointment.
Lynn A. Tweedt, a candidate for the position, advised that
she would be unable to make her presentation because of a prior
commitment. She asked if it would be possible to allow her to
speak at this time. Board members agreed. Ms. Tweedt then spoke
on her qualifications.
The Board then took the following actions:
1. INVITED qualified residents of Pleasant Hill to submit
applications for consideration for appointment to the
Mt. Diablo Hospital District Board of Directors, to be
submitted to the Office of the Clerk of the Board by
5 p.m. , October 30 , 1987;
2. DIRECTED the County Administrator to prepare questions
to be asked of each applicant; and
3 . SET November 3 , 1987 at 11 a.m. for deliberation and
decision, at which time applicants will have the
opportunity to speak on their qualifications, with
presentations limited to five minutes each.
cc: County Administrator
County Counsel I hereby cert."y 2hls,
an action taken and entore€l on :tie r.nff':;::::: •:; :•:1)
Board of Supervisors on the en'to shot' i.
ATTESTED: ZZ ,,,ee� -?-,V,, Z,--,e,7
PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of fire
of Supervisova Lnd County e?dr.:".Kls,-ator
a,s
TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: VVI tra
Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
DATE: C/'Vir y 11' /
October 29, 1987 tJ
SUBJECT:
Prohibition of Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages on
County .Premises
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S). OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND.JUST]F ICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the. following statement as county policy: No county
employee or volunteer shall offer, consume or be under the
. influence of ' any alcoholic beverage during work hours in or- on
any county owned or occupied facility or property. Consumption
of alcoholic beverages in or on a county facility or property,
for specified ceremonial occasions, may be allowed if.
specifically approved in advance by the Board of Supervisors.
All County Department Heads are responsible for enforcement of
this policy. This policy also applies to the Contra Costa County
Housing Authority and all special districts governed by this
Board.. The policy does not apply to county facilities or
property leased to other organizations. ' In such cases the terms -
of the lease will govern the offering and/or consumption of
alcoholic beverages in or on the leased facility or property.
BACKGROUND
The county has no written policy, other then provisions included
in .various memoranda of understandingwith employee
organizations, regarding the offering, consumption or being under
the influence of alcoholic beverages on or in county facilities.
This recommendation would establish policy prohibiting such
activities.
The reasons for adopting this policy include:
1. Reduction of liability exposure arising from actions of
..individuals who have consumed alcohol in/on county
facilities.
2 . Reduction of the potential -for work inefficiencies resulting
from the consumption of alcohol in county facilities.
3 . Reduction of the potential for poor public image of the .
operation of county government.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATUREIS1: _
ACTION OF BOARD ON ___:__October 27, 1987 A:-PROVED AS. RECOMMCMDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY-THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT:. ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED -_� ��� �9�•r
All County Departments PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY ,DEPUTY
\ M382/7-83 61 -