HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08071990 - 90/5296 4
THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on August 7, 1990 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson, Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:None
SUBJECT: Authorizing Referendum To Protect )
Existing Contra Costa County Rail )
Corridors Resolution 90/ 529
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT:
Existing railroad right of way corridors within this County (including its
unincorporated and incorporated areas) should be protected and preserved for continued rail
transportation freight carrier and passenger (commuter, etc. ) uses. Also, appropriate
protective action should be taken by cities within this County to maintain rail corridors
located therein. In order to provide for such rail corridor protection, this Board hereby
determines, orders and directs:
1 . That Ordinance No. 90- 65 _ adopted this date is to be presented for approval of,
and confirmation by the voters of Contra Costa County on November 6, 1990 according to the
attached ballot proposition and measure marked Exhibit A.
2. The County Clerk (Elections Clerk) is directed to take all steps necessary to place
the above-noted ballot measure on the November 6, 1990 ballot for the County and this
election be conducted with any other elections scheduled on November 6, 1990. If required,
a synopsis of the Ordinance may be used.
1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:""
PHIL M M LOR,clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and• county Administrator
O .By 2. 2! Deputy
VJW:pr
8-6-90)
p4[rcorr.vjw]
Attachment: Exhibit A
Orig. Dept: County Counsel
cc: County Administrator
Clerk, Elections Department
Assessor
Auditor
Tax Collector
Community Development Department
4
l
EXHIBIT A
Rail Corridor Protection. Shall Ordinance No. 90-6
of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County be
adopted to protect and preserve within the County's
unincorporated area existing rail corridors for
continued rail transportation freight and passenger uses
and similar protective action directed by involved
County cities?
ORDINANCE NO. 90- y
Authorizing Protection of Existing Contra Costa County
Railroad Right of Way Corridors)
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ORDAINS as follows:
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE AND INTENT. To the extent allowed by law, it is the
purpose and intent of this ordinance to provide for the protection and
preservation of existing railroad right of way corridors within Contra Costa
County (including its unincorporated and incorporated areas) for rail
transportation freight carrier and passenger uses. Further, this ordinance
expresses the intent of this County's voters that this protection should be
maintained by their referendum re-adoption herein of the substance of Contra
Costa County Ordinance No. 87-19 and extended by their direction to involved
County cities to adopt similar corridor protection.
ARTICLE II. RAIL CORRIDOR DESCRIPTIONS. The real property, shown on the
maps marked "Exhibit A" attached to Ordinance No. 87-19 and made a part hereof
by this reference, is hereby (and shall remain) rezoned by adding a "Railroad
Corridor Combining District" overlay zone (designated "-X") to the existing
zoning designation of all railroad right of way owned or occupied by Atchison,
Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (ATSF), Southern Pacific Transportation Company
SPT) , Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation (SFSP) , Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP) , or Bay Point and Clayton Railroad within the unincorporated area
of Contra Costa County.
The ATSF (or, If merged, SFSP) right of way is located between Richmond
city limits and Pinole city limits, which is zoned H-I (Heavy Industry) and R-
6 (Single Family Residential); the Hercules city limits and the Martinez city
limits, which is zoned H-I (Heavy Industry),. and A-2 (General Agriculture); in
the small unincorporated pocket surrounded by the City of Martinez west of
Alhambra Avenue, zoned A-2 (General Agriculture); between the Martinez city
limits near Howe Road and the Pittsburg city limits, zoned A-2 ; (General
Agriculture) , R-7 (Single Family Residential) , L-I (Light Industry) , and H-I
Heavy Industry) ; between the Pittsburg and Antioch city limits, zoned H-I
Heavy Industry); and between the Antioch city limits and the San Joaquin County
1-
ORDINANCE NO. 90-65
line, zoned H-I (Heavy Industry) , R-6 (Single Family Residential), P-1 (Planned
Development) , L-I (Light Industry), A-2 (General Agriculture) , A-3 (Heavy
Agriculture) , and C (General Commercial).
The SPT (or, upon approval of a merger, SFSP) right of way is located in
the unincorporated North Richmond area, which is zoned H-I (Heavy Industry) and
A-3 (Heavy Agriculture); in the unincorporated area between the City of Richmond
and the City of Pinole, zoned H-I (Heavy Industry); between the City of Hercules
and the City of Martinez, zoned H-I (Heavy Industry) , C (General Commercial);
between the City of Martinez and the City of Pittsburg, zoned H-I (Heavy
Industry) and A-2 (General Agriculture); in the unincorporated pocket near
Loveridge Road, zoned H-I (Heavy Industry) ; between the City of Antioch and the
City of Brentwood, zoned L-I (Light Industry); H-I (Heavy Industry), and A-2
General Agriculture); and between the City of Brentwood and the Alameda County
line, zoned A-2 (General Agriculture) , A-3 (Heavy Agriculture) , L-I (Light
Industry) , C (General Commercial), and H-I (Heavy Industry).
The Union Pacific right of way is located between the City of Concord and
the City of Pittsburg, zoned L-I (Light Industry) , R-6 (Single Family
Residential) , A-2 (General Agriculture), and H-I (Heavy Industry); and between
the City of Pittsburg and the City of Antioch, zoned ,H-I (Heavy Industry).
The Bay Point and Clayton right of way is located between the City of
Concord and the unincorporated area near Port Chicago, zoned L-I (Light
Industry) , H-I (Heavy Industry), and A-2 (General Agriculture).
All of the above properties are subject to the provisions of Title 8,
Chapter 26-2, Divisions 82, 84 and 88 (Zoning Ordinance) , and Title 9, Divisions
92, 94, 96, 981 912, 913, 914, 916, 918, 920, and 924 (Subdivision Ordinance)
of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code applicable to the above named zoning
districts, and are subject to the conditions and the requirements of this
Ordinance.
2-
ORDINANCE'NO. 90= 65
ARTICLE III. PERMIT AREA. All land uses that were previously allowed
under the existing, underlying zoning designations along the railroad right of
way are allowed under this "Railroad Corridor Combining District" Ordinance,
provided that no new land uses and/or structures, including residences and
pipelines for the transmission of oil , gas, water or other substances shall be
established, and no such uses and/or structures presently existing shall be
substantially expanded or altered, or demolished, without first having been
granted a conditional use permit, through procedures established in the County
Ordinance Code. These regulations shall apply to the areas contained within all
railroad rights of way in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County as
described and shown in the aforenoted Exhibit "A". No tentative, parcel or
final subdivision map shall be approved within said areas without concurrent
approval of a conditional use permit or development plan through procedures
established in the County Ordinance Code. No conditional use permit or
development plan shall be approved pursuant to this section unless the planning
agency finds that the proposed use and/or structure is consistent with the use
provisions of the underlying zoning district and all of the Elements of the
County's General Plan.
ARTICLE IV. EXCEPTIONS. This ordinance does not apply to insubstantial
alterations to existing structures, to insubstantial additions or changes to
existing uses, or to maintenance or repair of existing railroad-related
operations or equipment.
ARTICLE V. ZONING MAP. If necessary and required, the pages of the
County's 1978 Zoning Map (Ord. No. 78-93) referenced on the hereinabove noted
Exhibit "A", are further amended by the rezoning language contained in Article
II of this ordinance and the Community Development Director shall change the
Zoning Map accordingly, pursuant to County Ordinance Code 84-2.003.
ARTICLE VI. CONFLICT. This ordinance is intended to continue without
substantive change the implementation of Ordinance No. 87-19 in the
unincorporated area. But, in the case of any conflict between this ordinance
and Ordinance No. 87-19, the provisions of this ordinance shall control .
3-
ORDINANCE NO. 90- 65
ARTICLE VII. NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. Nothing in
this ordinance shall operate to deprive any landowner of substantially all of
the market value of .his/her property or otherwise constitute an unconstitutional
taking without compensation. If application of any of the provisions of this
ordinance to any specific project or landowner would create an unconstitutional
taking, then the Board of Supervisors may allow additional land uses or
otherwise adjust permit requirements to the extent necessary to avoid such
taking. Any such additional land uses or other adjustments shall be designed
to carry out the goals and provisions of this ordinance to the maximum extent
feasible.
ARTICLE VIII. CITY INSTRUCTION. By the adoption of this ordinance, the
voters of 'Contra Costa County hereby instruct and direct this County's cities
with existing rail right of way corridors to adopt this ordinance's provisions
to protect such corridors located therein and (as necessary) amend their general
plans to further this ordinance's goals.
ARTICLE IX. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is hereafter
determined to be , invalid by. a court of competent jurisdiction, all remaining
portions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Each section,
subsection, sentence, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance would have been
adopted and passed regardless of whether any one or more articles, sections,
subsections, sentences, phrases, parts or portions was declared invalid or
unconstitutional . Should this ordinance be determined to be entirely invalid,
then the provisions of Ordinance No. 87-19 shall remain in full force and
effect. But nothing herein upon the adoption of this ordinance, is intended to
thereafter prevent the amendment or repealing of Ordinance No. 87-19 by the
Board of Supervisors.
ARTICLE X. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon its confirmation, enactment and adoption by a majority of the voters voting
at the County-wide election to be held November 6, 1990.
4-
ORDINANCE NO. 90- 6s
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors, County of
Contra Costa, State of California, on August Z, 1990 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson, Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:None
ATTEST: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator
By: Yet
7T
Deputy Board Chair
SEAL
VJN:pr
8-6-90)
p4[ordreorrnJw]
5-
ORDINANCE NO. 90-6.5