HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 12112017 - Legislation Cte Agenda Pkt
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
December 11, 2017
10:30 A.M.
651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez
Supervisor Diane Burgis, Chair
Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Vice Chair
Agenda
Items:
Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference
of the Committee
1.Introductions
2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this
agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes).
3. APPROVE the Record of Action for the September 11, 2017 meeting of the
Legislation Committee with any necessary corrections.
4. ACCEPT the End of Session Report for 2017 and provide direction to staff, as
needed.
5. REVIEW the Draft 2018 State Legislative Platform, provide direction to staff on
any recommended changes, and RECOMMEND action to the Board of Supervisors.
6. REVIEW the Draft 2018 Federal Legislative Platform, provide direction to staff on
any recommended changes, and RECOMMEND action to the Board of Supervisors.
7.Adjourn
The Legislation Committee will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities
planning to attend Legislation Committee meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least
72 hours before the meeting.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and
distributed by the County to a majority of members of the Legislation Committee less than 96
hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, 10th floor,
during normal business hours.
Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day
prior to the published meeting time.
Page 1 of 166
For Additional Information Contact:
Lara DeLaney, Committee Staff
Phone (925) 335-1097, Fax (925) 646-1353
lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us
Page 2 of 166
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE 3.
Meeting Date:12/11/2017
Subject:Record of Action for Legislation Committee
Submitted For: LEGISLATION COMMITTEE,
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: 2017-34
Referral Name: Record of Action
Presenter: L. DeLaney Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097
Referral History:
County Ordinance (Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205, [d]) requires that each
County Body keep a record of its meetings. Though the record need not be verbatim, it must
accurately reflect the agenda and the decisions made in the meeting.
Any handouts or printed copies of material or testimony distributed at the meeting will be
attached to the meeting record.
Referral Update:
Attached for the Committee's consideration is the Draft Record of Action for its September 11,
2017 meeting.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
APPROVE the Record of Action, with any necessary corrections.
Attachments
Draft Record of Action
Page 3 of 166
D R A F T
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
September 11, 2017
10:30 A.M.
651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez
Supervisor Diane Burgis, Chair
Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Vice Chair
Agenda Items:Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee
Present: Diane Burgis, Chair
Karen Mitchoff, Vice Chair
Staff Present:Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator
Anne O, Chief of Staff, District IV
Susan Jeong, Policy & Planning Division, EHSD
Attendees: Sarah Crow
Alvaro Fuentes
1.Introductions
2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this
agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes).
No public comment was made.
3.APPROVE the Record of Action, with any necessary corrections.
The Committee unanimously approved the Record of Action with no corrections.
AYE: Chair Diane Burgis, Vice Chair Karen Mitchoff
Passed
4.REVIEW the draft Resolution and RECOMMEND its adoption, with any necessary
changes, to the Board of Supervisors.
The Committee voted unanimously to approve this item and directed staff to place
the item on the Board of Supervisors' consent calendar for September 19, 2017.
5.CONSIDER recommending to the Board of Supervisors a contract extension with the
Page 4 of 166
5.CONSIDER recommending to the Board of Supervisors a contract extension with the
current state and federal advocacy services providers for one year, January 1, 2018
through December 31, 2018.
The Committee voted unanimously to support staff's recommendation, directing
staff to conduct a contractor procurement process in 2018.
6.ACCEPT the report on the status of bills of interest to the County and provide direction
to staff and advocates, as needed.
The County's state advocates, Cathy Christian and Ben Palmer, were invited to the
meeting via conference call and provided a summary of the key bills of interest to
the County. The Supervisors were requested to provide advocacy support to oppose
AB 1250 and SB 649.
7.The next meeting is currently scheduled for October 9, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101,
651 Pine Street, Martinez.
The October 9 and November 13, 2017 meetings of the Legislation Committee were
subsequently cancelled.
8.Adjourn
The Legislation Committee will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Legislation Committee
meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of
members of the Legislation Committee less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, 10th
floor, during normal business hours.
Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time.
For Additional Information Contact:
Lara DeLaney, Committee Staff
Phone (925) 335-1097, Fax (925) 646-1353
lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us
Page 5 of 166
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE 4.
Meeting Date:12/11/2017
Subject:End of Session Report 2017
Submitted For: LEGISLATION COMMITTEE,
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: 2017-36
Referral Name: End of Session Report
Presenter: Cathy Christian & Ben Palmer Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097
Referral History:
At the conclusion of the legislative session, staff provides the Legislation Committee with a
summary report of advocacy activity at the state level. The County's legislative advocate, Cathy
Christian of Nielsen Merksamer, provides an update on top-priority bills and final outcomes of
the 2016 year (Attachment A).
Referral Update:
The End of Session report from the County's state advocates, Cathy Christian and Benjamin
Palmer of Nielsen Merksamer, is Attachment A.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
ACCEPT the End of Session Report from the state's advocates, Nielsen Merksamer, and provide
direction to staff, as needed.
Attachments
Attachment A
Page 6 of 166
To: David Twa
Lara Delaney
Contra Costa County
From: Cathy Christian
Benjamin Palmer
Date: December 1, 2017
Re: 2017 Legislation and Legislative Issues
In the early hours of the morning of September 16th, both houses of the California
State Legislature adjourned the first year of the 2016-2017 legislative session. As
is typical of the end of session in Sacramento, the legislature wrestled with a few
incredibly important issues until the very last moment. When the dust settled,
along with approving and sending Governor Brown hundreds of bills, they
managed to concur on a few issues that had remained unresolved from the 2015-
2016 session. Along with approving a long awaited $4 billion housing bond for
the November General Election Ballot, they passed a $4 billion parks and water
bond for the June 5th Statewide Primary Election Ballot and SB 54 (dé Leon), the
so called “Sanctuary State” bill. Also, in a major victory for California local
governments, a months long campaign by mostly local government entities and
non-profits was able to force the brakes on AB 1250 by Assemblyman Jones-
Sawyer, that would have dramatically changed and complicated the way local
governments establish personal services contracts.
And so it began…
2017 started out on some rocky footing. Governor Brown’s initial budget offering
included a $4.4 billion IHSS cost shift to counties. To make matters worse, his
proposed budget included no revenues to pay for the added costs to counties.
Counties were also dealt another significant blow as the Governor’s budget also
outlined an end to the IHSS MOE as a result of the discontinuation of the
Coordinated Care Initiative. The resulting $625 million cut, combined with the
IHSS cost shift set the stage for a very busy year. It is also worth mentioning that
the 2015-2016 legislative session ended without resolution on three of
California’s biggest issues/priorities, addressing California’s affordable housing
crisis, its chronic homelessness problem and the critical need for repair of
California’s local roads and streets. 2017 was going to be a year of challenges for
both the Legislature and California’s local governments.
Attachment A
Page 7 of 166
2
Just a few weeks later, on January 24th, in front of a joint session of the
legislature, Governor Brown swore in the State’s 33rd Attorney General, Xavier
Becerra. Becerra was appointed by the Governor to fill the void left by Kamala
Harris, who was elected to fill outgoing Senator Barbara Boxer’s seat. Becerra’s
congressional seat (CD 34) was filled by then Assemblyman, Jimmy Gomez.
Gomez’ 51st Assembly District seat remains vacant, and is currently contended by
an incredibly crowded field of more than a dozen, mostly Democratic, candidates.
In his brief tenure, Becerra has already waded into high profile battles with the
Trump Administration on U.S. – Mexico Border Wall construction, federal
immigration enforcement and greenhouse gas regulation.
In the first week of April, the logjam of big ticket items that the legislature had
not been able to resolve in the last legislation seemed to break. On April 6th, both
houses passed SB 1 (Beall) and ACA 5 (Frazier). Together, these bills increased
several taxes and fees to generate roughly $52 billion over 10 years to pay for
deferred maintenance on state highways and local streets and roads, and to
improve the state’s trade corridors, transit and active transit facilities. Further,
ACA 5 added a constitutional protection for the funding to ensure that it will be
used solely for transportation purposes. While this victory was not a panacea for
all of the issues plaguing California’s aging transportation infrastructure, it was a
significant step forward for the state and local governments.
On May 11th, Governor Brown released his much anticipated $124 billion May
Revise Budget document. The Governor’s proposal included an appropriation
(over 4 years) to counties for mitigating the impacts of the aforementioned IHSS
cost shift. Though this proposal was far better than the Governor’s initial
proposal to immediately shift a $623 million dollar obligation to counties, it still
leaves local governments with a significant financial and administrative burden
going forward. The Governor’s revised proposal also proposed a $500 million
child care package, and a $6 billion pay down for unfunded CalPERS pension
obligations that relied on the Proposition 2 Rainy Day Account. The May Revise
was slightly larger than last year’s $122.3 billion budget. The overall increase
came from an increase in the capital-gains revenue. Despite the increase in
revenue, the budget still predicts a $3.3 billion shortfall for 2017-2018 (down
from a predicted $5.8 billion shortfall predicted when the Governor’s initial
budget was proposed in January).
Yet another on time budget…
The legislature passed another on-time state budget on June 15th, and Governor
signed the document on the 27th. The total budget package (including GF, Special
and Bond Funds) topped out at just over $183 billion. Among other things, the
plan included $74.5 billion for K-12 education, expanded the earned income tax
credit, used $1.26 billion in tobacco tax revenue to raise Medi-Cal provider rates,
increased childcare provider reimbursement rates and included $8 million to
Attachment A
Page 8 of 166
3
provide access to full-day preschool for 2,059 children from low income working
families.
Along with the Budget and associated trailer bills, the legislature passed several
other significant pieces of legislation on a number of subjects. They passed bills
that 1.) curtailed the powers of the Board of Equalization 2.) lengthened the
amount of time available to qualify a recall ballot measure, in hopes thwarting the
effort to recall Senator Josh Newman 3.) reconciled portions of Proposition 64
with previously passed marijuana regulatory legislation 4.) strengthened dam
safety rules.
The final push…
When the legislature reconvened from its summer recess, the halls of the Capitol
were filled with the regular end-of-session chaos that comes with the glut of
legislation released (and/or held) from the legislature’s fiscal committees. Along
with the regular amending and vote wrangling, legislative leaders and the
Governor were working behind the scenes to garner enough support to finally
move on legislation addressing affordable housing and homelessness, parks /
drought / water / conservation and an extension of the state’s cap and trade
program. When the dust settled, in the wee hours of September 16th, the
Legislature also sent Governor Brown:
AB 398 (Garcia) – Extends California’s cap-and-trade program until 2030.
SB 2 (Atkins) - Enacts the Building Homes and Jobs Act that requires certain
percentages of moneys, collected through a $75 fee on real estate transaction
documents, be made available to local governments and the Department of
Housing and Community Development to provide funding for affordable
housing.
SB 3 (Beall) – Enacts the Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2018,
and authorizes the issuance of $4 billion in general obligation bonds for
affordable housing programs and a veteran’s home ownership program, subject
to approval by the voters in the November 6, 2018 election.
SB 35 (Wiener) - Creates a streamlined, ministerial approval process for infill
developments in localities that have failed to meet their regional housing needs
assessment (RHNA) numbers.
SB 5 (de León) – Proposes the Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal
Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018, subject to voter approval in
the June, 2018, election. This bill proposes the issuance of $3.5 billion in general
obligation bonds to implement its provisions. This bill contains $52 million for
natural community conservation plans.
Attachment A
Page 9 of 166
4
And also….
There were two significant, if only temporary, victories for CA local governments
in the last hours of session. AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer), which would have
established new standards for the use of personal services contracts for counties
was never brought up for a vote on the Senate Floor. The bill had been referred
to Senate Rules committee earlier in the month and many felt that it was
incredibly likely that the bill would resurface as a last minute play as local
governments and labor continued to firm up support for final floor votes. Local
governments would win the day, as the bill was never referred out of Rules
Committee. Though stalled for the year, none expect that we’ve seen the last of
1250. Advocates on both sides continue to strategize in anticipation of a 2018
push of 1250 or similar legislation.
The second major victory for CA local governments was the stalling of SCA 12
(Mendoza), which would have increased the size of Boards of Supervisors in
California’s largest counties and forced those counties to have an elected
executive and a new budget approval process. In a bit of a surprise, Senator
Mendoza, in his floor presentation of the bill, committed to work on the bill in the
interim and to remove the elected executive and budget adoption language. The
bill was subsequently voted to the Assembly where no further action was taken.
Negotiations continue.
But you can’t win them all…
Senator Hueso was able to get SB 649 which establishes a statewide framework
for streamlining the permit siting process for small cell wireless facilities made its
way to the Governor’s desk, despite a massive advocacy effort made by scores of
local government entities, labor and community groups.
Or maybe you can…
In one of his last bill actions of 2017, on his bill signing deadline date, at 11:56 PM
(according to the press release), the Governor announced that he had vetoed SB
649, stating in his veto message that:
“There is something of real value in having a process that results in extending
this innovative technology rapidly and efficiently. Nevertheless, I believe that
the interest which localities have in managing rights of way requires a more
balanced solution than the one achieved in this bill.”
The final analysis…
All in all, 2017 was an incredibly productive year for the Legislature and
Governor. Along with another on-time budget, they were able to make forward
progress on numerous fronts where progress had been elusive. That being said,
2018 will continue to demand their attention and action as policies are
implemented and anticipated revenues will need to be allocated. Much as the
Attachment A
Page 10 of 166
5
end of the 2017 session was focused on legislation that CA local governments
were concerned with, 2018 will likely begin in the same manner. And while that
is a full plate, 2018 is also an election year. Attention to the regular business of
running the largest state in the Union will be challenged by the prospect of a new
Governor, legislative members and leaders in both houses, state Constitutional
officers and any number of ballot measures that qualify. And, if that wasn’t
enough, US House and Senate seats will be up for grabs and the field of
challengers for both continues to grow every day. Next year will be a test of
endurance no matter how you measure it.
Contra Costa County Advocacy Bills:
AB 18 (Garcia) - Enacts the California Clean Water, Climate, Coastal Protection
and Outdoor Access For All Act, which would authorize the issuance of bonds to
finance a clean water, climate, and coastal protection and outdoor access for all
program. Provides for the submission of these provisions to the voters at the
statewide direct primary election.
Status: In Senate Appropriations Committee
AB 205 (Wood) - Implements provisions regarding federal regulations
governing Medicaid managed care plans. Authorizes a person to request a
hearing involving a MediCal managed care plan within a specified number of
days after receiving a specified notice. Requires the Department of Health Care
Services to develop standards for specified provider types to ensure covered
services are accessible to enrollees of MediCal managed care plans, and
establishes timely appointment standards for MediCal managed care plans.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 738, Statutes of 2017
AB 435 (Thurmond) - Authorizes certain counties to develop and implement
individualized county child care subsidy plans. Requires the Early Education and
Support Division of the State Department of Education to review, and approve or
disapprove the plans. Authorizes local policy to supersede state preschool
eligibility periods.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 703, Statutes of 2017
AB 557 (Rubio) - Authorizes, as of July 1, 2018, applicants for and recipients of
CalWORKs benefits, who have experienced domestic violence, to be eligible for
CalWORKs homeless assistance and good-cause exemptions from school
participation and immunization requirements under specified circumstances.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 691, Statutes of 2017
AB 732 (Frazier) - Extends indefinitely the operation of the authorization to
advance funds to reimburse local agencies under a program for the maintenance
or improvement of project or non-project levees.
Attachment A
Page 11 of 166
6
Status: Held on Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File
AB 818 (Burke) - Permits a CalWORKs recipient to request an extension to the
24-month welfare-to-work time clock in order to obtain a high school education
or its equivalent, or to participate in education or activities subsequent to the
acquisition of a high school diploma or its equivalent.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 141, Statutes of 2017
AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer) - Establishes specific standards for the use of
personal services contracts by counties. Requires the county to demonstrate that
the proposed contract will result in costs savings to the county and to show that
the contract does not cause displacement of county or city workers. Establishes
liability provisions for employment law violations and torts committed in the
course of providing services under contract. Imposes disclosure requirements on
contracts.
Status: Held in Senate Rules Committee
AB 1268 (Reyes) - Creates the Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault
Prevention Fund to provide grants to nonprofit organizations for the purpose of
funding programs that incorporate comprehensive, evidence-based, and
promising practices to prevent domestic violence and sexual assault. Requires
grants to be awarded by the Office of Emergency Services according to criteria for
funding. Creates specified requirements for organizations receiving funds.
Status: Held on Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File
AB 1404 (Berman) - Revises exemptions from the California Environmental
Quality Act to include proposed residential and mixed-use housing projects
occurring within an unincorporated area of a county. Requires the Office of
Planning and Research to recommend proposed regulatory amendments for the
implementation of these provisions.
Status: Held on Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File
AB 1603 (Ridley Thomas) - Provides that persons who are employed jointly
by a public agency and any other employer (e.g., a private staffing agency or
registry) at specified public clinics or hospitals are public employees subject to
the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. The bill also provides that these public/private
jointly-employed employees may be included in appropriate bargaining units
without the consent of any agency or joint employer.
Status: Senate Inactive File
SB 1 (Beall) - Increases several taxes and fees to raise the equivalent of roughly
$52.4 billion over ten years in new transportation revenues and makes
adjustments for inflation every year; directs the funding to be used towards
Attachment A
Page 12 of 166
7
deferred maintenance on the state highways and local streets and roads, and to
improve the state's trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017
SB 171 (Hernandez) - Implements various provisions in regard to governing
Medicaid managed care plans. Requires the department to determine the
remittance amount on a plan-specific basis for each rating region of the plan and
to calculate the federal and nonfederal share amounts associated with each
remittance. Requires the nonfederal share of amounts remitted by a Medi-Cal
managed care plan to be transferred to the Medically Underserved Account for
Physicians within the Health Professions Education Fund.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 768, Statutes of 2017
SB 231 (Hertzberg) - Relates to a provision of the California Constitution that
requires that assessments, fees, and charges be submitted to property owners for
approval or rejection after the provision of written notice and the holding of a
public hearing.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 536, Statutes of 2017
SB 522 (Glazer) - Dissolves the existing elected board of the West Contra Costa
Healthcare District. Requires the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra
Costa, at its election, to either serve as the district board.
Status: Senate Rules Committee
SB 649 (Hueso) - Establishes a statewide framework for streamlining the
permit siting process for small cell wireless facilities that meet specified
requirements. Specifically, this bill requires an administrative and encroachment
permit in lieu of a discretionary permit for installations in the right-of-way and
also within a commercial or industrial zone, limits the fees to these attachments
to all costs plus $250, and establishes other requirements.
Status: Vetoed by Governor
SB 704 (Galgiani) - Requires that the Division of Boating and Waterways
collaborate with the California Conservation Corps and use members of the corps
in implementing its invasive aquatic plants control programs.
Status: Signed by Governor, Chapter 247, Statutes of 2017
SCA 3 (Dodd) - Creates an additional exception to the 1% real property tax limit
for a rate imposed by a city, county, or special district to service bonded
indebtedness incurred to fund public library facilities, that are approved by a
certain percentage of the voters of the city, county, or special district.
Status: Senate Inactive File
Attachment A
Page 13 of 166
8
SCA 12 (Mendoza) - Provides that in a county that is found, beginning with the
2020 census, to have a population of more than 5 million, the measure requires a
governing body consisting of a sufficient number of members as to ensure that
each member represents a district containing a population equivalent to no more
than 2 districts in the U.S. House of Representatives. Requires a county that is
found to have a population of more than 5 million to have an elected county
executive.
Status: In Assembly
Attachment A
Page 14 of 166
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE 5.
Meeting Date:12/11/2017
Subject:Draft 2018 State Legislative Platform
Submitted For: LEGISLATION COMMITTEE,
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: 2017-37
Referral Name: Draft 2018State Platform
Presenter: L. DeLaney Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097
Referral History:
Each fall, the County Administrator’s Office initiates the development of the coming year’s State
and Federal Legislative platforms by inviting members of the Board of Supervisors, Department
Heads and key staff, as well as the Board's advisory bodies, to provide recommended changes or
additions to the current adopted Platforms. In September, all were invited to provide suggested
edits to the State Platform by submitting input in writing.
The Legislation Committee typically reviews the draft Platform in November and/or December,
with the Proposed Platform recommended to the Board of Supervisors for adoption in January.
The Draft 2018 State Platform in redline version (showing changes from the adopted 2017
Platform) is Attachment A. A clean-copy version is Attachment B .
The proposed policies from the Contra Costa County Commission on Women are included in
Attachment C. The proposed amendments from the Hazardous Materials Commission are
included in the Draft 2018 State Platform.
Referral Update:
The significant proposed amendments to the 2017 State Platform that are recommended by staff
for the 2018 Draft State Platform include the following:
COUNTY-SPONSORED LEGISLATION
For 2018, the following bill will be pursued:
West Contra Costa Healthcare District (SB 522)
Given the District’s limited funding and change in operations, legislation that would allow the
Board of Supervisors to appoint the District’s governing body is necessary and appropriate. It
would eliminate the cost of elections and foster collaboration between the District and the County
as these two public agencies work together to meet the medical needs of District residents. On
Page 15 of 166
August 1, 2017, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to seek legislation
to change the District’s Board of Directors from an elected board to one appointed by the Board
of Supervisors. The District’s governing body also supports this change. A bill has been
introduced to accomplish this, SB 522, and will be considered in January 2018.
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY ADVOCACY PRIORITIES
Staff is not recommending any changes to the nature or order of legislative priorities for 2018.
However, a text change is recommended to Priority 1: State Budget to recognize the anticpated
impact of the State-imposed changes to the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program.
STATE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS
Climate Change
Add: Policy #20: SUPPORT efforts to expand eligible expenditures of the Greenhouse Gas
Revenue Fund to investments in accessible transit/transportation systems (serving seniors,
disabled, veterans) which result in more efficient (shared trips, increased coordination) service
and corresponding reductions in greenhouse gas production. This policy is in support of the
accessible transit/transportation initiatives discussed during the Measure X and 2017 Countywide
Transportation Plan approval, and is consistent with the "Accessible
Transportation" report provided to the Board of Supervisors in September 2017 which
documented the need for substantial investment to make improvements in this field. The
September 2017 report established that the County is not unique in this situation; these issues are
widespread which justifies a statewide/nationwide legislative approach.
Add: Policy #24: As California and the East Bay region experiences more frequent and prolonged
periods of extreme heat, extreme heat will impact human health, demand on health services,
potable water, agriculture, vectors, wild fires, and demand on electricity. SUPPORT funding and
infrastructure to help protect vulnerable communities and populations as the mean temperature of
the region steadily increases due to global climate change.
Health Care
In addition to numerous text changes, staff proposes the addition of the following policies:
85. SUPPORT legislation and administrative actions that further align a statewide regulatory
framework for the commercial cannabis industry and that continue to authorize local jurisdictions
to adopt more restrictive measures to protect the health, safety and welfare of
their residents.
109. SUPPORT legislation that extends the restrictions and prohibitions against the smoking of,
and exposure to, marijuana products in various places, including, but not limited to, places of
employment, school campuses, public buildings, day care facilities, multi-family
housing, health facilities, alcohol and other drug treatment facilities, and homeless shelters;
further prohibit marijuana edibles to prevent youth/children access to harmful products;
restrictions on advertising of marijuana products targeting youth and near places frequented
by youth or alcohol and other drug treatment facilities.
110. SUPPORT funding, legislation, policy, and programs that would accomplish the following:
Page 16 of 166
a. create an effective crisis response system of services for persons experiencing homelessness,
particularly families and transition-age youth; b. increases permanent housing with services for
persons experiencing or at-risk of homelessness with a chronic disability; and c. protects and
expands the availability of affordable housing, particularly for the Very Low and Extremely Low
Income population.
111. OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly and/or
permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and programming that would
lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs. Reductions in federal human services
funding and programming severely limits critical support for our community and state. Block
grants often lead to decreases in funding that forces states to limit benefits for families, cap
enrollment, and establish waitlists. These restrictions result in families who need these supports
and services, not being able to access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and
distress.
112. OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that
represent significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the health
care system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee
categories to a per-capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for state
Medicaid programs. These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to offset the
loss of federal funding. Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population
of approximately 250,000 people, including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result.
113. OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to repeal DACA (Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative efforts that target individuals due to
their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Human Services
Human Services was reorganized into the following categories: Administrative Support Services,
Aging and Adult Services, Safety Net Programs, Early Care and Education, Child Welfare, and
Violence Prevention. New policy proposals include the following:
114. OPPOSE the establishment of specific or stricter standards for the use of personal services
contracts by counties, that would make contracting with community-based organizations more
difficult for counties.
127. SUPPORTS efforts to allow counties to use alternative reassessment approaches, including
but not limited to telephonic reassessments, that would be applied to customers rated low on the
Functional Index Rating Scale.
128. SUPPORT efforts that focus on dependent adult and elder abuse prevention including, but
not limited to, providing respite for caregivers.
129. SUPPORT efforts that identify, eliminate and prevent in-home neglect of the elderly and
dependent adults; and scams and fraud (internet and otherwise) targeted at the elderly and
dependent adults.
130. SUPPORT efforts that would require the California Department of Social Services to
translate all state-provided materials used by In-Home Support Services providers into the
Page 17 of 166
statewide threshold languages: English, Spanish, Armenian, and Chinese.
131. SUPPORT efforts that would help to stabilize and provide short-term housing supports for
at-risk Adult Protective Services clients.
132. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would enhance confidentiality of DMV records for Adult
Protective Services social workers (a practice already in place for Child Protective Services social
workers).
148. SUPPORT efforts for a more flexible framework that allows the state to supplement
CalFresh benefits if federal assistance is insufficient or unavailable. Recent natural disasters have
underscored the need for a more permanent framework for the state to
respond.
149. SUPPORT continuous investment in the California Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC)
and efforts to increase access to California Earned Income Tax Credit, including increase in tax
credit.
150. SUPPORT the expansion of benefits and services for immigrants, refugees, and asylum
seekers.
151. SUPPORT providing funding for graduation bonuses for non-pregnant/parenting
CalWORKs students who obtain a high school diploma/equivalent.
152. SUPPORT shared housing efforts to secure permanent housing assistance for CalWORKs
participants.
166. SUPPORT efforts to that would establish/allow the enrollment of 2.9 year olds in the
California State Preschool Program.
167. SUPPORT alignment of family eligibility for subsidized child care with cost of living
adjustments and higher minimum wage rates.
168. SUPPORT the restoration of State Quality Child Care Funds which funds the Local Child
Care Planning Council.
169. SUPPORT the increase in flexibility of child care contracts with the California Department
of Education that would allow voluntary transfer of funds to occur outside of November and May
months.
170. SUPPORT efforts to raise wages for the early care and education workforce (such as child
care workers, preschool/infant-toddler teachers).
171. SUPPORT efforts that encourage access to early education home visiting programming -
supporting families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth and development
of their young children.
176. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would amend the definition of “relative” as applied to state
funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payments (Kin-Gap) to be consistent with the federally
funded Kin-Gap. This will allow all Kinship guardianship cases to be treated
uniformly and allow more families to experience independence, normalcy and other benefits of
Page 18 of 166
permanence as legal guardians.
178. SUPPORT efforts to expand California Earned Income Tax Credit (Cal-EITC) eligibility to
former foster youth under age 25 years.
179. SUPPORT efforts that would create state Homeless Youth Housing Program grants fund to
establish or expand programs that provide specified housing assistance and supportive services to
homeless youth.
184. SUPPORT efforts to increase training on human trafficking (with a specific focus on labor
trafficking) for law enforcement and others involved in criminal investigations.
185. SUPPORT efforts that seek to specialize and build expertise for designated staff and systems
(such as developing a commercially sexually exploited youth court or creating human trafficking
units) to better support survivors of human trafficking.
186. SUPPORT efforts that differentiate risk and provide differential response for both victims of
domestic violence and sex crimes and offenders of domestic violence and sex crimes.
187. SUPPORT efforts to increase language access and cultural responsive services for survivors
of interpersonal violence.
188. SUPPORT efforts that foster collaboration across protective and criminal systems which
allow for facilitation of cross-reporting of interpersonal violence.
189. SUPPORT efforts to increase cross-agency and cross-system collaboration on human
trafficking and domestic violence cases including the sharing of confidential or protected
information in multidisciplinary team settings in order to increase support for survivors.
190. SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools.
191. SUPPORT efforts that ensure survivors of interpersonal violence feel safe to access services.
Land Use/Community Development
The following policy proposal was submitted by the Hazardous Materials Commission:
213. SUPPORT legislation that funds programs to remediate brownfield sites in the County and
modifies existing programs to make implementation easier or apply more broadly. Specifically:
Consider modification to the Cleanup Loans and Environmental Assistance to
Neighborhoods (CLEAN) program that would simply the approval process for applications;
Broaden the criteria for sites that are eligible for California Land Reuse and Revitalization
Act (CLRRA) to include all sites that are listed by the State or Federal Government as
contaminated; and
Fully fund the California Recycle Underutilized Sites (CALReUse) program.
Transportation
In addition to text changes, staff proposes the following additional policies:
Page 19 of 166
249. OPPOSE efforts to condition or link the distribution of transportation funds to a jurisdiction’s
production of housing relative to RHNA (Regional Housing Needs Allocation).
250. SUPPORT administrative or legislative mechanisms that facilitate coordination between
transportation agencies and utilities relative to expediting construction projects. Without willing
and proactive coordination, transportation projects are subject to delays and
substantially increased costs. These costs are borne by the taxpayers.
Workforce Development
Staff proposes the addition of the following policy:
265. SUPPORT efforts to include marginally attached workers, including discouraged workers,
and involuntary part-time workers more formally in the California Workforce Investment Act.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
REVIEW the Draft 2018 State Legislative Platform, provide direction to staff on any
recommended changes, and RECOMMEND action to the Board of Supervisors.
Attachments
Attachment A: Draft 2018 State Platform--redline
Attachment B: Draft 2018 State Platform--cleancopy
Attachment C: CCCW Platform Proposals
Page 20 of 166
2018 DRAFT
STATE LEGISLATIVE
PLATFORM
Contra Costa County
December 11, 2017
Style Definition: TOC 2: Indent: Left: 0.15", Tab stops:
6.5", Right,Leader: …
Attachment A--redline version
Page 21 of 166
1
Deleted: Contra Costa County
Table of Contents
COUNTY-SPONSORED LEGISLATION ............................................................................................... 2
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY ADVOCACY PRIORITIES ............................................................. 2
STATE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS .......................................................................................... 5
Agriculture................................................................................................................................................. 5
Animal Services ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Child Support Services .............................................................................................................................. 7
Climate Change ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Delta Water Platform ................................................................................................................................ 9
Elections .................................................................................................................................................... 9
Emergency Preparedness, Emergency Response ................................................................................... 10
Eminent Domain ..................................................................................................................................... 10
Flood Control and Clean Water............................................................................................................... 1 1
General Revenues/Finance ..................................................................................................................... 11
Health Care ............................................................................................................................................. 13
Human Services ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Indian Gaming ......................................................................................................................................... 2 8
Land Use/Community Development ....................................................................................................... 2 9
Law and Justice System ........................................................................................................................... 32
Levees...................................................................................................................................................... 33
Library……………………………………………………………………………………………………… .......................................... 34
Pipeline Safety……………………………………………………………………………………………….. ................................... 35
Telecommunications and Broadband ..................................................................................................... 3 5
Transportation ........................................................................................................................................ 3 6
Veterans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 8
Waste Management................................................................................................................................ 3 9
Workforce Development ........................................................................................................................ 41
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Tab stops: Not at 6.5"
Deleted: 9
Deleted: 0
Deleted: 19
Deleted: 5
Deleted: 6
Deleted: 28
Deleted: 29
Formatted: Indent: First line: 0", Tab stops: Not at 6.5"
Deleted: ..
Deleted: 1
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0", Tab stops: Not
at 6.5"
Deleted: s
Deleted: 1
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Tab stops: Not at 6.5"
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 3
Deleted: 5
Deleted: 6
Deleted: 37
Attachment A--redline version
Page 22 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 2
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
2018 STATE LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Each year, the Board of Supervisors adopts a State Legislative Platform that establishes priorities
and policy positions with regard to potential State legislation and regulation. The State Legislative
Platform includes County-sponsored bill proposals, legislative or regulatory advocacy priorities
for the year, and policies that provide direction and guidance for identification of and advocacy
on bills which would affect the services, programs or finances of Contra Costa County.
COUNTY-SPONSORED LEGISLATION
West Contra Costa Healthcare District (SB 522)
Given the District’s limited funding and change in operations, legislation that would allow the
Board of Supervisors to appoint the District’s governing body is necessary and appropriate. It
would eliminate the cost of elections and foster collaboration between the District and the County
as these two public agencies work together to meet the medical needs of District residents. On
August 1, 2017, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to seek legislation
to change the District’s Board of Directors from an elected board to one appointed by the Board
of Supervisors. The District’s governing body also supports this change. A bill has been
introduced to accomplish this, SB 522, and will be considered in January 2018.
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY ADVOCACY PRIORITIES
Each year, issues emerge through the legislative process that are of importance to the County and
require advocacy efforts. For 2018, it is anticipated that critical issues requiring legislative
advocacy will include the following:
Priority 1: State Budget – The state’s continuing economic recovery, prior budget cuts, and the
additional, temporary taxes provided by Proposition 30 have combined to bring the State Budget
to a much improved financial condition. While the Governor's Budget identifies cost pressures
and budget risks in health and human services programs, of particular concern to counties is the
inadequate reimbursement for our ever-increasing cost of operating several human services
programs: the “Human Services Funding Deficit,” formerly referred to as the “Cost of Doing
Business.” The annual shortfall between actual county expenses and state reimbursement has
grown to over $1 billion since 2001, creating a de facto cost shift to counties. The funding gap
forces counties to reduce services to vulnerable populations and/or divert scarce county resources
from other critical local services. It also increases the risk of state and federal penalties.
Due to the restructuring of In-home Supportive Services (IHSS) funding in the State Budget (SB
90), the new Maintenance of Effort will shift program costs to counties; Contra Costa County
anticipates a resultant decrease in IHSS administration funding. At the same time, the County
anticipates that IHSS caseloads and authorized hours per case will continue to increase. In Contra
Costa County, the number of caseloads increased by 16% from FY 2013-14 to FY 2016-17; the
number of providers grew by 13%; and average authorized hours per case increased by 19%. The
Deleted: 7
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Highlight
Deleted: Authorizing/Enabling Legislation Regarding Title 5,
California Code of Regulations (School Facilities Construction)¶
¶
The County has been engaged in advocating for the reform of school
siting policies for a number of years. Late in 2016 the California
Department of Education (CDE) announced an effort to revise Title
5 to, among other things, “align school facilities and siting policies
with state sustainability goals…” In meeting with CDE staff and our
Legislative Delegation over the past 5 years it has become apparent
that in order to revise Title 5 such that requirements (as opposed to
guidance) can be established, a legislative solution may be
necessary.
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: 7
Formatted: Highlight
Attachment A--redline version
Page 23 of 166
3
Deleted: Contra Costa County
new proposed administrative funding is not expected to match the growing need for increased
administration time and support needed to meet the demand of the growing IHSS population.
Anticipated negotiations for the FY 2019-2020 State budget will re-examine the funding structure
for IHSS and determine the sustainability of county revenues and programs.
Priority 2: Health Care – Counties play a critical role in California’s health reform efforts.
Counties serve as employers, payers, and providers of care to vulnerable populations.
Consequently, counties actively participate in discussions of how to best reform and preserve the
health care system in California and implement the national health care reform legislation passed
in 2010, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The optional Medi-Cal Expansion, in effect on Jan. 1, 2014, was a significant part of the State
Budget process in 2013. The ACA had required states to expand Medicaid programs to allow
childless adults at or below 138 percent of poverty to be eligible for Medicaid (known as Medi-
Cal in California). The Supreme Court struck down that mandate but allowed it to be an option for
states, which California exercised.
However, significant unknowns remain including questions about the actual impact of the ACA
coverage expansions on counties and the number of uninsured individuals to whom counties will
still need to provide services. Counties will retain the Section 17000 responsibility, and there will
be significant variations in the impacts of both the ACA and AB 85 for the different types of
counties: county hospital (12 counties including Contra Costa County), payor/clinic and County
Medical Services Program (CMSP) counties.
The County will continue to work on the implementation of required health care reform measures
to maximize federal revenue. The County will support efforts to provide counties with the
necessary tools to implement health care reform which may include performing eligibility and
enrollment, preserving existing county resources from 1991 Realignment, providing for a smooth
transition for the various operational systems, and supporting legislation to ensure that low-income
families are covered under the Affordable Care Act while opposing legislation which would reduce
Medi-Cal eligibility. In addition, the County will continue to work to reduce uncompensated
health care costs, work on the adequacy of rates under the new health care system, and advocate
for adequate state funding for community-based health and social service networks to improve
service coordination, health outcomes and quality of life.
Priority 3: Water and Levees /The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta – The enactment of the Delta
Reform Act (2009), a bill that established the co-equal goals for reliable water supply and
ecosystem restoration for the Delta, created the Delta Stewardship Council, and supported the
proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) --an effort to construct a pair of massive tunnels
under the Delta-- will bring significant, large-scale change to the Delta as we know it. The scope
and content of these changes, as well as enduring political battles between northern and southern
California over water, will continue to guide legislative and administrative agendas in the coming
year. Enabling legislation was also passed in 2009 for a state water bond, which was delayed from
the 2010 and 2012 ballots but successfully passed on the 2014 state ballot, as Proposition 1.
Commented [LD1]: Proposed by EHSD.
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: stand ready to
Deleted: In the coming year, t
Attachment A--redline version
Page 24 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 4
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
Significant future impacts on the County in the areas of water quality and supply, levee stability,
ecosystem health, local land use authority and flood control are anticipated.
Particular areas of concern for 2018 include, but are not limited to: (1) the ongoing development
of the BDCP project, now recast as the California WaterFix (CWF) and whether the state water
bond appropriates funds specific to the BDCP/CWF; and (2) the impacts of the Delta Plan on local
land use authority, efforts to expedite state bond funding for levee improvement projects, and the
development of flow standards that will impact water quality and ecosystem health in the Delta.
The County’s adopted Delta Water Platform, as well as the Strategic and Action Plans, are
incorporated in this Platform by reference.
Priority 4: Realignment Implementation – The battle for constitutional protections for 2011
Realignment concluded successfully on November 6, 2012 when Proposition 30 was passed by
the voters. Proposition 30 provides constitutional guarantees to the funding that supports
Realignment and safeguards against future program expansion without accompanying funding.
With these provisions in place, Contra Costa County continues to implement the array of programs
transferred under 2011 Realignment, confident that funding is secure and programmatic
responsibilities are defined. However, the County remains concerned that the funding is not
sufficient and is also concerned about liability issues arising from the new responsibilities.
Any future proposals to realign programs to counties must have constitutionally guaranteed
ongoing funding and protections. The County will oppose any proposals that would transfer
additional program responsibility to counties without funding, constitutional protections, county
participation and approval. The County will also oppose efforts that limit county flexibility in
implementing programs and services realigned in 2011 or infringe upon our ability to innovate
locally. The County resolves to remain accountable to our local constituents in delivering high-
quality programs that efficiently and effectively respond to local needs. Further, we support
counties’ development of appropriate measures of local outcomes and dissemination of best
practices.
With regard to Public Safety realignment, counties have received parolees whose latest crime fits
the specified “non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offender” (N3) definition but who have a criminal
background that includes violent, serious and/or sexual crimes. Under the current legislation, the
person’s latest offense/crime determines if they meet the N3 criteria. These individuals should
stay under the responsibility of the state.
The County will also support efforts to provide additional funding/grants to those counties that
have a commitment to lowering the crime rate and reducing recidivism through the provision of
innovative, comprehensive, evidence-based programs for offender populations and their families.
The County will also continue to support efforts to ensure that the receipt of Local Community
Corrections Funds matches the amounts anticipated from the state, without undue delay. Finally,
the County also supports more funding for mental health and behavioral health programs and
facilities in order to meet the requirements of Realignment and the goal of reducing recidivism.
Deleted: 7
Deleted: can continue
Deleted: will
Attachment A--redline version
Page 25 of 166
5
Deleted: Contra Costa County
STATE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS
A brief background statement accompanies policy positions that are not self-evident. Explanatory notes
are included either as the preface to an issue area or following a specific policy position. Please note that
new and revised policy positions are highlighted. The rationale for the policy position is italicized.
Agriculture
1. SUPPORT efforts to ensure sufficient State funding for pest and disease control and
eradication efforts to protect both agriculture and the native environment, including glassy-
winged sharpshooter, light brown apple moth, and Japanese dodder activities; high risk
pest exclusion activities; pesticide regulatory and law enforcement activities; and noxious
weed pest management. Agriculture is an important industry in Contra Costa County.
Protection of this industry from pests and diseases is important for its continued viability.
2. SUPPORT continued appropriations for regulation and research on sudden oak death, a
fungal disease affecting many species of trees and shrubs in native oak woodlands. The
County’s natural environment is being threatened by this disease.
3. SUPPORT funding for agricultural land conservation programs and agricultural enterprise
programs, and support revisions to State school siting policies, to protect and enhance the
viability of local agriculture. The growth in East County and elsewhere has put significant
pressure on agricultural lands, yet agriculture is important not only for its production of
fresh fruits, vegetables and livestock, but also as a source of open space.
4. SUPPORT legislation to establish legal authority where needed to facilitate the efforts by
the California Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of Boating and
Waterways to survey and treat all infestations of the South American spongeplant and to
rid the Delta of this and other invasive aquatic species through integrated pest management
methods. Invasive aquatic species are a threat to agriculture, the environment and
recreation in the Delta. This position includes support for efforts by the Department of
Boating and Waterways to secure multi-year permits for eradication of multiple invasive
aquatic plant species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and its marshes .
5. SUPPORT the CSAC policy statement regarding revisions to the California Conservation
Act of 1965 (the Williamson Act) to support legislative changes that preserve the integrity
of the Williamson Act, eliminate abuses resulting in unjustified and premature conversions
of contracted land for development, and to fully restore Williamson Act subventions. The
state subventions to counties also must be revised to recognize all local tax losses.
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Italic
Attachment A--redline version
Page 26 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 6
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
Animal Services
6. SUPPORT efforts to protect local revenue sources designated for use by the Animal
Services Department; i.e., animal licensing, fines and fees. Fines, fees, and licensing are
major sources of revenue for the Animal Services Department. The demand for animal
services is increasing each year as does the demand on the General Fund. It is important
to protect these revenue sources to continue to provide quality animal service and to meet
local needs.
7. SUPPORT efforts to protect or increase local control and flexibility over the scope and
level of animal services. Local control over the scope of animal services is necessary to
efficiently address public safety and other community concerns. Local control affords
jurisdictions the ability to tailor animal service programs to fit their communities. Animal
related issues in dense urban areas vary from those in small, affluent communities.
8. SUPPORT efforts to protect against unfunded mandates in animal services or mandates
that are not accompanied by specific revenue sources which completely offset the costs of
the new mandates, both when adopted and in future years. Unfunded mandates drain our
limited fiscal resources and, at the same time, chip away at local control over the scope
and level of services.
9. SUPPORT efforts to ensure full funding of State animal services mandates, including
defense of the Department of Finance’s lawsuit against the State Commission on Mandates
regarding the State obligations for reimbursement of local costs for animal services
incurred in compliance with SB 1785. The County invested large sums of money to comply
with SB 1785, with the assurance that our cost would be offset by reimbursements from the
State. Failure by the State to honor the reimbursements negatively impacts the County
General Fund and Animal Services’ budget.
10. SUPPORT efforts to protect and/or increase County flexibility to provide animal services
consistent with local needs and priorities. The demand for quality animal service
programming continues to increase each year. The County is experiencing population
growth and changing demographics. It is incumbent upon the Animal Services Department
to be flexible enough to adjust to the changing needs and priorities.
11. SUPPORT efforts to preserve the integrity of existing County policy relating to Animal
Services (e.g., the Animal Control Ordinance and land use requirements). Contra Costa is
looked upon as one of the model Animal Services Departments in the state. Its policies,
procedures, and ordinances are a yardstick against which other Animal Control
organizations are measured. The local control exercised by the Board of Supervisors is
key to that hallmark.
Deleted: the
Formatted: Highlight
Attachment A--redline version
Page 27 of 166
7
Deleted: Contra Costa County
Child Support Services
12. SUPPORT the establishment of a statewide electronic registry for the creation and
release/satisfaction of liens placed on property of a non-custodial parent as necessary to
collect delinquent child support payments. California law currently provides that
recording an abstract or notice of support judgment with a County Recorder creates a lien
on real property. This requires recording the judgment in each of the 58 counties in order
not to miss a property transaction. An electronic registry would simplify not only the
creation of liens but also the release/satisfaction of liens because there would be a single
statewide point of contact, and the entire process would be handled electronically through
automated means.
13. SUPPORT amendment of current law that states that documents completed and recorded
by a local child support agency may be recorded without acknowledgement (notarization)
to clarify that the exception is for documents completed or recorded by a local child support
agency. This amendment clarifies that documents that are prepared by the local child
support agency and then sent for recording either by the local child support agency or by
the obligor (non-custodial parent) or by a title insurance company are covered by the
exemption, a technical point not acknowledged by all county recorder offices.
14. SUPPORT efforts to simplify the court process for modifying child support orders by the
court by requiring court appearances only when one of the parties objects to the
modification. Currently, establishment of parentage and support by the court is permitted
without court appearance if both parties are in agreement. A similar process for
modification would reduce court time, the workload of all involved agencies and parties,
and streamline the process.
15. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that the reduction to the California Department of Child
Support Services is not passed down as a reduction to the local program.
16. SUPPORT efforts that would require the Department of Child Support Services to provide
any notice form, information, or document that is required or authorized to be given,
distributed, or provided to an individual, a customer, or a member of the public to be given,
distributed, or provided in a digitized form, and by any means the Department determines
is feasible, including, but not limited to, e-mail or by means of a website.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 28 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 8
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
Climate Change
17. SUPPORT the CSAC Climate Change Policy Statements and Principles which address a
broad range of issues affected by climate change, including water, air quality, agriculture,
forestry, land use, solid waste, energy and health. The document is largely based on
existing CSAC policy and adapted to climate change. Additionally, the document contains
a set of general principles which establish local government as a vital partner in the
climate change issue and maintain that counties should be an active participant in the
discussions in the development of greenhouse gas reduction strategies underway at the
state and regional level.
18. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that the implementation of AB 32 results in harmony between
the greenhouse gas reduction target created by the Air Resources Board for each
regional/local agency, the housing needs numbers provided by the state Department of
Housing and Community Development pursuant to housing element law, and the
Sustainable Communities Strategy developed through the Regional Transportation Plan
processes.
19. SUPPORT legislative or administrative efforts that favor allocation of funding from the
California Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade Program to jurisdictions that are the largest
emitters of greenhouse gas, have disadvantaged communities that are disproportionately
affected by environmental pollution, have Natural Community Conservation Plans or
similar land conservation efforts that will address climate change and have demonstrated a
local commitment to climate protection (e.g. established emissions reduction targets,
prepared Climate Action Plans, etc.). The County has several good projects that would
sequester carbon, such as Creek and wetland restoration projects.
20. SUPPORT efforts to expand eligible expenditures of the Greenhouse Gas Revenue Fund
to investments in accessible transit/transportation systems (serving seniors, disabled,
veterans) which result in more efficient (shared trips, increased coordination) service and
corresponding reductions in greenhouse gas production. This policy is in support of the
accessible transit/transportation initiatives discussed during the Measure X and 2017
Countywide Transportation Plan approval, and is consistent with the "Accessible
Transportation" report provided to the Board of Supervisors in September 2017 which
documented the need for substantial investment to make improvements in this field. The
September 2017 report established that the County is not unique in this situation; these
issues are widespread which justifies a statewide/nationwide legislative approach.
21. SUPPORT efforts to ensure life-cycle costs are considered when planning new projects in
the state. A key challenge for State and local agencies is funding the ongoing operation
and maintenance of infrastructure. This includes all aspects of the built environment:
buildings, roads, parks, and other infrastructure. As California begins to implement more
aggressive climate goals, the State should be thinking about new methodologies for
anticipating project costs. In particular, it is evident that California will need a different
transportation system than the one we have currently, and that this new transportation
system will be more expensive to maintain. Traditional accounting methods that look only
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Pattern: Clear (Yellow),
Highlight
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Font: Italic, Pattern: Clear (Yellow), Highlight
Commented [LD2]: Submitted by John Cunningham, DCD.
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 29 of 166
9
Deleted: Contra Costa County
at initial project cost lead to situations where infrastructure fails, at greater replacement
cost than if ongoing operation and maintenance had been included from the beginning.
This would include methodologies for internalizing the social and environmental costs of
projects.
22. SUPPORT revisions to the Public Resources Code and the Air Resources Board’s
Investment Plans to provide Cap and Trade funding for the conservation of natural lands,
parks and open space through fee title acquisition as well as easements.
23. OPPOSE changes to the California Environmental Protection Agency’s protocols for
designating disadvantaged communities which result in a reduction in the number or size
of disadvantaged communities in Contra Costa County. Disadvantaged communities are
prioritized for receipt of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds, the funding source for a
number of state grant programs. Contra Costa County has a number of communities and
neighborhoods that are economically and socially disadvantaged and located near large,
current and former industrial sites. These industrial operations contribute through the Cap
and Trade program to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The state designations should
continue to reflect the disproportionally acute needs of these communities.
24. As California and the East Bay region experiences more frequent and prolonged periods of
extreme heat, extreme heat will impact human health, demand on health services, potable
water, agriculture, vectors, wild fires, and demand on electricity. SUPPORT funding and
infrastructure to help protect vulnerable communities and populations as the mean
temperature of the region steadily increases due to global climate change.
Delta Water Platform
To protect the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from various detrimental forces that are
affecting its health and resources, it is the policy of Contra Costa County to support
implementation of projects and actions that will help improve the Delta ecosystem and the
economic conditions of the Delta. Contra Costa County has adopted a Delta Water
Platform to identify and promote activities and policy positions that support the creation
of a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Contra Costa County will use this Platform to
guide its own actions and advocacy in other public venues regarding the future of the Delta.
Elections
25. SUPPORT legislation to adjust precinct sizing from 1,000 voters per precinct to 1,250
voters per precinct. With the option of being able to have up to 1,250 voters per precinct,
the best polling locations in a neighborhood can be selected, and that same site is more
likely to be used for several elections, thus avoiding the need to change poll sites for voters.
26. SUPPORT full state reimbursement for state mandates imposed upon local registrars by
the Secretary of State, including special state elections. The state has committed to
reimburse Counties for the cost of certain state mandates. That reimbursement process,
SB 90, can be lengthy and contentious. The SB 90 process is also subject to uncertainties
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD3]: Submitted by Public Health Director.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 30 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 10
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
including partial payments, delayed payments, and now, suspended or no payments. In
lieu of the SB 90 process for Elections, there is merit in the examination of having the state
pay its pro-rata share of costs when state candidates/measures are on the ballot.
Emergency Preparedness, Emergency Response
27. SUPPORT legislation that would give local agencies more authority to train volunteers,
provide funding for Community Emergency Response Training (CERT), and help clean-
up oil spills without taking on additional legal liability.
28. SUPPORT legislation that would require the state’s Oil Spill Prevention and Response
Agency to improve communication and clean-up technology, increase safety standards for
ships and establish special protections for ecologically sensitive areas.
29. SUPPORT legislation that would require responses to future oil spills in a shorter
timeframe, with a more regional approach.
30. SUPPORT measures that enable counties and other local agencies to better exercise their
responsibilities to plan for and respond to emergencies and disasters without taking on
additional legal liability and oppose those that do not recognize or support the county and
local agency role in the State’s Standardized Emergency Management System.
31. SUPPORT legislation or other measures requiring the creation or utilization of emergency
rock stockpiles suitable for levee repair throughout the Delta, enabling increasingly
efficient and less costly prevention of levee breaks and enhancement of initial response
capabilities.
32. SUPPORT legislation that expands school safety improvement programs such as education
regarding and placement of automated external defibrillator(s) (AED(s)) in schools.
Eminent Domain
33. SUPPORT legislation that maintains the distinction in the California Constitution between
Section 19, Article I, which establishes the law for eminent domain, and Section 7, Article
XI, which establishes the law for legislative and administrative action to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare.
34. SUPPORT legislation that would provide a comprehensive and exclusive basis in the
California Constitution to compensate property owners when property is taken or damaged
by state or local governments, without affecting legislative and administrative actions taken
to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 31 of 166
11
Deleted: Contra Costa County
Flood Control and Clean Water
35. SUPPORT authorization for regional approaches to comply with aquatic pesticide permit
issues under the purview of the State Water Resources Control Board. Contra Costa
County entered into an agreement with a neighboring county and several cities to share
the costs of monitoring. While it makes sense for local government to pool resources to
save money, State Board regulations make regional monitoring infeasible.
36. SUPPORT efforts to provide local agencies with more flexibility and options to fund
stormwater programs. Stormwater permit requirements issued by the Regional Water
Quality Control Boards are becoming more and more expensive, yet there is no funding.
Stormwater services, encompassing both water quality and drainage/flood control, could
be structured like a utility with the ability to set rates similar to the other two key water
services: drinking water and wastewater.
37. SUPPORT efforts to provide immunity to local public agencies for any liability for their
clean-up of contaminations on private lands. This will be more critical as the Regional
Water Quality Control Boards institute Total Maximum Daily Loads, which establish a
maximum allowable amount of a pollutant (like mercury) in the stormwater from a
watershed.
38. SUPPORT efforts to require the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to provide 200
year flood plain mapping for all areas in the legal Delta. SB 5 requires the County and
cities in the Delta to insure certain development projects must have 200 year level of
protection and to make certain related findings. DWR has revisited developing 200-year
flood plain maps, but if they do, only working in areas protected by project levees which
does not include any areas within Contra Costa County.
39. SUPPORT legislation to enable Zone 7 Water Agency to become a new public agency,
separate and apart from the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District, with territory in both Alameda and Contra Costa counties and the power to provide
specific services, insofar as the legislation is guided by adopted Principles of
Understanding.
General Revenues/Finance
As a political subdivision of the State, many of Contra Costa County’s services and programs are the result
of state statute and regulation. The State also provides a substantial portion of the County’s revenues.
However, the State has often used its authority to shift costs to counties and to generally put counties in the
difficult position of trying to meet local service needs with inadequate resources. While Proposition 1A
provided some protections for counties, vigilance is necessary to protect the fiscal integrity of the County.
40. SUPPORT the State's effort to balance its budget through actions that do not adversely
affect County revenues, services or ability to carry out its governmental responsibilities.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 32 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 12
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
41. OPPOSE any state-imposed redistribution, reduction or use restriction on general purpose
revenue, sales taxes or property taxes unless financially beneficial to the County. (Note that
a redistribution of sales and property tax may be beneficial to Contra Costa County in the
event that sales tax growth lags behind property tax growth.)
42. OPPOSE efforts to limit local authority over transient occupancy taxes (TOT).
43. OPPOSE any efforts to increase the County's share-of-cost, maintenance-of-effort
requirements or other financing responsibility for State mandated programs absent new
revenues sufficient to meet current and future program needs.
44. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that Contra Costa County receives its fair share of State
allocations, including mental health funding under Proposition 63 and pass-through of
federal funds for anti-terrorism and homeland security measures. The State utilizes a
variety of methods to allocate funds among counties, at times detrimental to Contra Costa
County.
45. SUPPORT efforts to receive reimbursement for local tax revenues lost pursuant to sales
and property tax exemptions approved by the Legislature and the State Board of
Equalization.
46. SUPPORT continued efforts to reform the state/local relationship in a way that makes both
fiscal and programmatic sense for local government and conforms to the adopted 2010
CSAC Realignment Principles, with an emphasis on maximum flexibility for counties to
manage the existing and realigned discretionary programs.
47. SUPPORT efforts to relieve California of the federal Child Support penalties without
shifting the cost of the penalties to the counties.
48. SUPPORT a reduction in the 2/3rd vote requirement to 55% voter approval for locally-
approved special taxes that fund health, education, economic, stormwater services, library,
transportation and/or public safety programs and services.
49. SUPPORT efforts to authorize counties to impose forfeitures for violations of ordinances,
as currently authorized for cities. This would provide the County with the opportunity to
require deposits to assure compliance with specific ordinance requirements as well as
retain the deposit if the ordinance requirements are not met. Currently, the County is
limited to imposing fines which are limited to only $100 - $200 for the first violation, which
has proven to be an ineffective deterrent in some cases.
50. SUPPORT efforts to redefine the circumstances under which commercial and industrial
property is reassessed to reduce the growing imbalance between the share of overall
property tax paid by residential property owners versus commercial/industrial owners.
51. SUPPORT efforts to reduce County costs for Workers’ Compensation, including the ability
to control excessive medical utilization and litigation. Workers’ Compensation costs are
Attachment A--redline version
Page 33 of 166
13
Deleted: Contra Costa County
significant, diverting funds that could be utilized for County services. Workers’
Compensation should provide a safety net for injured employees, for a reasonable period
of time, and not provide an incentive for employees to claim more time than medically
necessary.
52. SUPPORT state actions that maximize Federal and State revenues for county-run services
and programs.
53. SUPPORT legislative compliance with both the intent and language of Proposition 1A.
54. SUPPORT the provisions of Proposition 22 that would protect County revenues,
particularly as related to transportation revenues and excluding those provisions related to
redevelopment funds.
55. SUPPORT full State funding of all statewide special elections, including recall elections.
56. OPPOSE efforts of the State to avoid state mandate claims through the practice of repealing
the statues, then re-enacting them. In 2005, the State Legislature repealed sections of the
Brown Act that were subject to mandate claims, then re-enacted the same language
pursuant to a voter-approval initiative, and therefore, not subject to mandate claims.
57. SUPPORT strong Public Utilities Commission (PUC) oversight of state-franchised
providers of cable and telecommunications services, including rigorous review of financial
reports and protection of consumer interests. AB 2987 (Núñez), Chapter 700, statutes of
2006 transferred regulatory oversight authority from local government to the PUC.
58. SUPPORT timely, full payments to counties by the State for programs operated on their
behalf or by mandate. The State currently owes counties over $1 billion in State General
Funds for social services program costs dating back to FY 2002-03.
59. SUPPORT full State participation in funding the County’s retiree and retiree health care
unfunded liability. Counties perform most of their services on behalf of the State and
Federal governments. Funding of retiree costs should be the responsibility of the State, to
the same extent that the State is responsible for operational costs.
60. SUPPORT legislation that provides constitutional protections and guaranteed funding to
counties under Realignment.
Health Care
The County remains concerned about the implementation of any health care reform measures that could transfer
responsibility to counties, without commensurate financing structures or in a manner not compatible with the County’s
system. The County supports a concept of universal health coverage for all Californians. Toward that end, the County
urges the state to enact a system of health coverage and care delivery that builds upon the strengths of the current
systems in our state, including county-operated systems serving vulnerable populations.
Currently, California has a complex array of existing coverage and delivery systems that serve many, but not all,
Californians. Moving this array of systems into a universal coverage framework is a complex undertaking that
Commented [LD4]: All edits to Health Care provided by
HSD.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 34 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 14
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
requires sound analysis, thoughtful and deliberative planning, and a multi-year implementation process. As California
moves forward with health care reform, the County urges the state to prevent reform efforts from exacerbating
problems with existing service and funding. The state must also consider the differences across California counties
and the impacts of reform efforts on the network of safety-net providers, including county providers. The end result of
health reform must provide a strengthened health care delivery system for all Californians, including those served by
the safety net.
61. SUPPORT state action to increase health care access and affordability. Access to care and
affordability of care are critical components of any health reform plan. Expanding
eligibility for existing programs will not provide access to care in significant areas of the
state. Important improvements to our current programs, including Medi-Cal, must be made
either prior to, or in concert with, a coverage expansion in order to ensure access.
Coverage must be affordable for all Californians to access care.
62. SUPPORT Medi-Cal reimbursement rate increases to incentivize providers to participate
in the program.
63. SUPPORT actions that address provider shortages (including physicians, particularly
specialists, and nurses). Innovative programs, such as loan forgiveness programs, should
be expanded. In an effort to recruit physicians from other states, the licensing and
reciprocity requirements should be re-examined. Steps should be taken to reduce the
amount of time it takes to obtain a Medi-Cal provider number (currently six to nine
months).
64. SUPPORT efforts that implement comprehensive systems of care, including case
management, for frequent users of emergency care and those with chronic diseases and/or
dual (or multiple) diagnoses. Approaches should include community-based providers and
could be modeled after current programs in place in safety net systems.
65. SUPPORT efforts that provide sufficient time for detailed data gathering of current safety
funding in the system and the impact of any redirection of funds on remaining county
responsibilities. The interconnectedness of county indigent health funding to public health,
correctional health, mental health, alcohol and drug services and social services must be
fully understood and accounted for in order to protect, and enhance as appropriate,
funding for these related services.
66. OPPOSE safety net funding transfers until an analysis of who would remain uninsured (e.g.
medically indigent adults, including citizens, who cannot document citizenship under
current Medicaid eligibility rules) is completed in order to adequately fund services for
these populations.
67. SUPPORT efforts to clearly define and adequately fund remaining county responsibilities.
68. SUPPORT state action to provide an analysis of current health care infrastructure (facilities
and providers), including current safety net facilities across the state, to ensure that there
are adequate providers and health care facilities (including recovery facilities), and that
they can remain viable after health reform.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 35 of 166
15
Deleted: Contra Costa County
69. SUPPORT efforts to provide adequate financing for health care reforms to succeed.
70. SUPPORT measures that maximize federal reimbursement from Medicaid and S-CHIP.
71. SUPPORT state action to complete actuarial studies on the costs of transferring indigent
populations, who currently receive mostly episodic care, to a coverage model to ensure that
there is adequate funding in the model.
72. SUPPORT efforts that ensure that safety net health care facilities remain viable during the
transition period and be supported afterwards based on analyses of the changing health
market and of the remaining safety net population.
73. SUPPORT state action to implement a Medi-Cal waiver in a manner that maximizes the
drawdown of federal funds for services and facilities, provides flexibility, and ensures that
counties receive their fair share of funding.
74. SUPPORT efforts to increase revenues and to contain mandated costs in the County's
hospital and clinics system.
75. SUPPORT efforts to obtain a fair-share of any state funds in a distribution of funding for
the integration of IHSS and managed care.
76. SUPPORT efforts to increase the availability of health care (including alcohol and other
drugs recovery) to the uninsured in California, whether employed or not.
77. SUPPORT legislation that improves the quality of health care, whether through the use of
technology, innovative delivery models or combining and better accessing various streams
of revenue, including but not limited to acute and long term care integration.
78. SUPPORT legislation to protect safety net providers, both public and private. Legislation
should focus on stabilizing Medi-Cal rates and delivery modes and should advocate that
these actions are essential to the success of any effort to improve access and make health
care more affordable.
79. SUPPORT state efforts to increase the scope of benefits and reimbursement rates contained
in Minor Consent Medi-Cal to give youth with substance abuse disorders access to a
continuum of care, including residential and outpatient treatment.
80. SUPPORT efforts to give incentives to providers to establish more youth substance use
disorder residential treatment facilities within the county.
81. SUPPORT efforts to extend Drug Medi-Cal and Minor Consent Medi-Cal Coverage to
incarcerated youths, many of whom are in custody due to drug related crimes. This could
greatly decrease recidivism in the juvenile justice system.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Deleted: <#>SUPPORT efforts that allow counties to draw
down federal Medicaid funds for providing confidential alcohol
and drug screening and brief intervention services to pregnant
women and women of childbearing age who also qualify for
Medi-Cal benefits. ¶
<#>¶
Deleted: <#>suffering from
Deleted: <#>one-on-one
Deleted: -driven
Deleted: community
Attachment A--redline version
Page 36 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 16
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
82. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support coverage of medically necessary alcohol
and substance use related disorder treatment at the same level as other medical conditions
in health care services, including county’s responsibility for Federal Financial Participation
(FFP) portion to increase Drug Medi-Cal reimbursement rates and incentivize providers to
participate in the program.
83. SUPPORT legislation that extends the restrictions and prohibitions against the smoking of,
and exposure to, tobacco products to include restrictions or prohibitions against electronic
cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in various places, including, but not limited to, places of
employment, school campuses, public buildings, day care facilities, retail food facilities,
multi-family housing, and health facilities; preventing the use of tobacco, electronic
smoking devices (e-cigarettes) and flavored tobacco by youth and young adults;
eliminating exposure to second-hand and third-hand smoke; restrictions on advertising of
electronic smoking devices; reducing and eliminating disparities related to tobacco use and
its effects among specific populations; increasing the minimum age to 21 to purchase
tobacco products; and the promotion of cessation among young people and adults. Support
legislation that extends restrictions and prohibitions against the sale of flavored tobacco
products, prohibits the sale of tobacco products in stores that operate a pharmacy and
establishes distance and density restrictions on the establishment of a new tobacco retailer
within proximity of youth sensitive venues such as schools, day cares, or parks.
84. SUPPORT and encourage state, federal and/or private funding for pharmaceutical research
for the development of new cannabis products which would meet Federal Drug
Administration (FDA) standards of known strengths and attributes (and without
unnecessary side effects) which would be dispensable through pharmacies and medical
facilities consistent with State and Federal law.
85. SUPPORT legislation and administrative actions that further align a statewide regulatory
framework for the commercial cannabis industry and that continue to authorize local
jurisdictions to adopt more restrictive measures to protect the health, safety and welfare of
their residents.
86. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support population-based chronic disease
prevention efforts. Collectively, these include efforts to move up-stream from the treatment
of illness associated with chronic disease to advance a policy, systems and organizational-
change approach to address the underlying environmental factors and conditions that
influence health and health behaviors.
87. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support developing a workforce with
gerontological expertise to manage the exponential growth in the chronically ill aging
population.
88. SUPPORT efforts that would advance a Health-In-All-Policies approach to policy work
done across the County. This implies consideration of how health is influenced by the built
environment and a connection with land use planning and development.
Deleted: <#>SUPPORT county efforts in the promotion of
partnerships that provide integrated responses to the needs of
alcohol and other drugs populations, including criminal justice,
perinatal and youth as well as those populations with co-occurring
disorders.¶
<#>¶
<#>SUPPORT and encourage the development of strategies that
include alcohol and other drugs services in the provision of all
culturally appropriate health care services. ¶
<#>¶
Deleted: <#>efforts to require
Deleted: <#>abuse
Deleted: <#>on
Deleted: <#>s
Deleted: <#>
Deleted: <#>plans and disability insurance policies
Deleted: <#>Alcohol and other drugs treatment services are the
most under-funded of all health services. Neither the state nor
the federal allocations to the County covers medical treatment for
AOD services, and so are a cost borne by the County.
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Attachment A--redline version
Page 37 of 166
17
Deleted: Contra Costa County
89. SUPPORT ongoing study of the health impacts of global and regional climate change and
ongoing countywide mitigation and adaptation efforts.
90. SUPPORT efforts that would preserve the nature and quality and continuity of care
associated with safety net services historically provided at the local level, such as the
California Children’s Services (CCS) and Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP)
programs, which are being transitioned into managed care at the state level.
91. SUPPORT efforts that promote aging in place through the utilization of long-term supports
and services and caregiver support services.
92. SUPPORT increasing the level of funding for Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS)
and Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) to meet the increase in cost to provide
services and to meet the tremendous increase in the aging population.
93. SUPPORT maintaining level or enhanced funding, streamlined processes and greater
flexibility for use of State and Federal funding to respond to Public Health Emergency
Preparedness initiatives including Pandemic Influenza, emerging diseases, and continued
funding for all categories related to Public Health Preparedness, including Hospital
Preparedness Program, Homeland Security, Cities Readiness Initiative and core Public
Health Preparedness.
94. SUPPORT increased funding and policy changes for Tuberculosis (TB) prevention and
treatment, to reflect the increased risk of transmission faced across the Bay Area. The Bay
Area, including Contra Costa County, experiences more cases of active Tuberculosis than
do most states in the nation. The demographic make-up of our communities combined with
frequent international travel between the Bay and areas where TB is endemic, present an
added risk and thus the need to maintain adequate funding and program infrastructure.
95. SUPPORT increased funding for the public health infrastructure, capacity and prevention
services as outlined in the public health components of the Affordable Care Act and the
National Prevention and Public Health Fund.
96. SUPPORT recognition of Local Public Health Departments as an authorized provider for
direct billing reimbursement related to the provision of Immunization, Family Planning,
HIV, STD and TB services.
97. SUPPORT the reversal of the pre-emption language regarding local Menu-Labeling that is
included the Affordable Care Act.
98. SUPPORT enhanced funding and capacity for public health programs, specifically:
a. Prevention programs in the areas of chronic disease, specifically, obesity, diabetes,
asthma and cancer;
Deleted:
Deleted:
Deleted: r.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 38 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 18
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
b. Prevention and risk reduction programs in the area of HIV, STD, teen pregnancy, injury
prevention as well as health promotion programs, such as nutrition and activity
education;
c. Oral health programs, especially those which address the needs of children and those
with oral health disparities;
d. Protecting the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF), as established in the
Affordable Care Act;
e. Increased resources dedicated to surveillance and prevention programs targeting
chronic diseases such as cardiovascular, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and asthma, as well
as injury and violence;
f. Funding and initiatives that support the surveillance, prevention and local preparation
for emerging diseases, such as Zika, novel Influenza, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C,
Chlamydia, and seasonal Influenza and public health programs which provide
screening, diagnosis, and treatment;
g. Provide for adequate State funding for children’s programs, including the California
Children’s Services (CCS) program for clients who are not Medi-Cal eligible to assure
that counties are not overmatched in their financial participation;
h. Programs which seek to monitor and address the needs of Foster youth, especially those
on psychotropic medication; and
i. Best practice programs which seeks to protect and enhance the health of pregnant
women and that address maternal, child and adolescent health needs.
99. SUPPORT efforts to strengthen needle exchange programs as part of an overall program
to combat the spread of HIV and other diseases; allowing items associated with needle
exchange programs such as, cookers, sterile water, and cotton to be distributed along with
clean needles; and the elimination of the federal ban on funding needle exchange programs.
100. SUPPORT legislative efforts to reduce or eliminate lead and toxic substances in consumer
products, particularly those used by infants and children.
101. SUPPORT legislative efforts to reduce exposure to toxic air pollutants and the reduction
of greenhouse gases.
102. SUPPORT funding, policy and programs dedicated to suicide, injury and violence
prevention. Additionally, support efforts aimed at reducing health disparities and inequities
associated with violence against women, communities of color and the LGBT community.
Programs which seek to limit the effects of injury, violence and abuse on children, seniors
and persons with disability.
103. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support program development aimed at reducing
the misuse of prescription drugs, most especially opioids, and increase prevention and
treatment of opioid disorders to eliminate overdoses and combat the opioid epidemic.
Additionally, support funding and legislation to restrict the sale and use of powdered
alcohol and other similar products marketed to youth.
Deleted: .
Deleted: .
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: Combating infectious and emerging
Deleted:
Deleted: and
Deleted: .
Deleted:
Deleted: ,
Deleted: and
Deleted: resources
Deleted: for local capacity to address new state laws regarding
restrictions on the sale and use of powdered alcohol.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 39 of 166
19
Deleted: Contra Costa County
104. SUPPORT necessary County infrastructure and adequate funding related to education,
regulatory, testing and enforcement functions associated with the State Medical Marijuana
regulatory controls.
105. SUPPORT legislation and/or similar policy efforts to tax certain beverages that contain
added sugars, by establishing a per fluid ounce health impact fee on sugar sweetened
beverages at the distributor level. In addition, support efforts which would create the Sugar
Sweetened Beverage Safety warning act, which would require a safety warning on all
sealed sugar sweetened beverages.
106. SUPPORT legislation and efforts that support healthy meals, adequate meal time, and
increased physical activity/education for school-age children.
107. SUPPORT efforts to dedicate funding that sustains and expands non-infrastructure Safe
Routes to School programs that educate students, parents, and school staff about safe
walking and bicycling to school.
108. SUPPORT efforts to address the underlying determinants of health and health equity, such
as housing and prevention of displacement, educational attainment and livable wage jobs,
and accessible transportation.
109. SUPPORT legislation that extends the restrictions and prohibitions against the smoking of,
and exposure to, marijuana products in various places, including, but not limited to, places
of employment, school campuses, public buildings, day care facilities, multi-family
housing, health facilities, alcohol and other drug treatment facilities, and homeless shelters;
further prohibit marijuana edibles to prevent youth/children access to harmful products;
restrictions on advertising of marijuana products targeting youth and near places frequented
by youth or alcohol and other drug treatment facilities.
110. SUPPORT funding, legislation, policy, and programs that would accomplish the following:
a. create an effective crisis response system of services for persons experiencing
homelessness, particularly families and transition-age youth;
b. increases permanent housing with services for persons experiencing or at-risk of
homelessness with a chronic disability; and
c. protects and expands the availability of affordable housing, particularly for the
Very Low and Extremely Low Income population.
111. OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly
and/or permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and
programming that would lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs.
Reductions in federal human services funding and programming severely limits critical
support for our community and state. Block grants often lead to decreases in funding that
forces states to limit benefits for families, cap enrollment, and establish waitlists. These
restrictions result in families who need these supports and services, not being able to
access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and distress.
Deleted: and
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Attachment A--redline version
Page 40 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 20
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
112. OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that
represent significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the
health care system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee
categories to a per-capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for
state Medicaid programs. These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to
offset the loss of federal funding. Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population
of approximately 250,000 people, including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result.
113. OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to repeal DACA (Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative efforts that target individuals
due to their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Human Services
Administrative Support Services
114. OPPOSE the establishment of specific or stricter standards for the use of personal services
contracts by counties, that would make contracting with community-based organizations
more difficult for counties.
Aging and Adult Services
115. SUPPORT efforts to promote safety of Adult Protective Services workers conducting
required unannounced home visits by allowing them to request and receive from law
enforcement criminal record checks through the California Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System (CLETS). This would primarily be used for reported abusers
in the household.
116. SUPPORT efforts to develop emergency temporary shelter and/or short-term options for
Adult Protective Services population and consider options that include but are not limited
to, licensing of facilities specifically for this population and exploring Medi-Cal billing
options to support clients in hospitals and other care facilities pending a more permanent
housing placement.
117. SUPPORT simplification of IHSS service hour calculation and allocation to insure
compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and efficiently provide services to
consumers.
118. SUPPORT efforts that seek to identify and eliminate elder financial abuse and elder
exposure to crime that may be committed through conservatorships, powers of attorney,
notaries and others who have the right to control elder assets, including through solutions
that allow access for Adult Protective Services to access financial records for investigation
of financial abuse and exploitation. Financial abuse is a fast-growing form of abuse of
seniors and adults with disabilities and current law does not authorize financial institutions
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering,
Pattern: Clear
Formatted: Pattern: Clear (Yellow)
Commented [LD5]: Input provided by EHSD.
Formatted: Font: Italic, No underline, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left +
Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: Italic, No underline, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Italic, No underline
Formatted: Justified, Tab stops: Not at 0.5"
Deleted: /and or
Attachment A--redline version
Page 41 of 166
21
Deleted: Contra Costa County
to grant access to financial records necessary to investigate the reported abuse without the
consent of the account holder or authorized representative.
119. SUPPORT efforts to establish an “umbrella code” for the reporting of incidents of elder
abuse to the Department of Justice, thus more accurately recording the incidence of
abuse. Current reporting policies within California’s law enforcement community and
social services departments are uncoordinated in regards to the reporting of adult
abuse. Under an “umbrella code,” law enforcement agencies and social services
departments would uniformly report incidents of elder abuse and California would have
much better data for policy and budget development purposes.
120. SUPPORT funding for statewide Adult Protective Services training.
121. SUPPORT establishing a State funded and administered General Assistance Program. The
General Assistance Program is 100% County funded. Moving it to the State would relieve
pressure on the County budget and appropriately direct costs to the State.
122. SUPPORT legislative efforts that allow for coordination of services and data, across state
and county departments, that support aging and elder populations.
123. SUPPORT creation of a pilot program “Fostering Dignity in Aging,” to provide grant
funding to counties to be used specifically for housing preservation and eviction prevention
services of victims of elder and dependent adult abuse, exploitation, neglect, or self-
neglect.
124. SUPPORT creation of funding opportunities and policies which promote the development
of aging-friendly communities.
125. SUPPORT legislation and investments related to long-term care, senior housing
affordability, medical service access, transportation, isolation and other quality of life
issues to support aging with dignity.
126. SUPPORT research that describes and assesses local service needs and gaps impacting
aging residents and that proposes specific and actionable local strategies to address these
needs.
127. SUPPORTS efforts to allow counties to use alternative reassessment approaches, including
but not limited to telephonic reassessments, that would be applied to customers rated low
on the Functional Index Rating Scale.
128. SUPPORT efforts that focus on dependent adult and elder abuse prevention including, but
not limited to, providing respite for caregivers.
129. SUPPORT efforts that identify, eliminate and prevent in-home neglect of the elderly and
dependent adults; and scams and fraud (internet and otherwise) targeted at the elderly and
dependent adults.
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Moved (insertion) [1]
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Justified
Attachment A--redline version
Page 42 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 22
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
130. SUPPORT efforts that would require the California Department of Social Services to
translate all state-provided materials used by In-Home Support Services providers into the
statewide threshold languages: English, Spanish, Armenian, and Chinese.
131. SUPPORT efforts that would help to stabilize and provide short-term housing supports for
at-risk Adult Protective Services clients.
132. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would enhance confidentiality of DMV records for Adult
Protective Services social workers (a practice already in place for Child Protective Services
social workers).
Safety Net Programs
133. SUPPORT efforts to extend family stabilization mental health/substance abuse funding to
include all family members. Current law only funds services for adult Welfare to Work
participants.
134. SUPPORT solutions to address gaps in existing state statute that cause disruptions to
continuity of care for some Covered California Insurance Affordability Program (IAP)
enrollees when a new determination of IAP takes place.
135. SUPPORT the use of state funds to pay for CalFresh benefits for those Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACAs) and PRUCOL (Permanent Residents Under the Color of
Law) who would otherwise be ineligible for CalFresh.
136. SUPPORT efforts to extend eligibility to zero share of Medi-Cal cost when recipients
report new earned income. Potential increases to state and local minimum wage impacts
eligibility to free health care.
137. SUPPORT efforts to extend eligibility of CalWORKs benefit by exempting the first 6
months of earned income received from new employment or wage increases. This is
intended to create better financial stability when a family’s income increases due to
changes in local and state minimum wage law.
138. SUPPORT fully funding Medi-Cal Administrative costs.
139. SUPPORT efforts to increase County flexibility in the use of CalWORKs funds and in
program requirements in order to better support the transition of welfare dependent families
from welfare-to-work to self-sufficiency, including, but not limited to: extending
supportive services beyond the current limit; enhancing supportive services; increasing
diversion and early intervention to obviate the need for aid.
Legislative changes to support these initiatives could include the following:
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Justified, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Bold, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Justified
Deleted: I
Attachment A--redline version
Page 43 of 166
23
Deleted: Contra Costa County
a. Supportive Services. Extending the length of time CalWORKS recipients can
receive supportive service such as help with transportation, child care, work
uniforms, etc.
b. Welfare to Work. Extending the length of time families can receive Welfare to
Work services (job training and search and other employment related services)
including job retention services. Currently CalWORKS recipients are eligible to
receive supportive services and Welfare to Work services for up to 48 months if
they are in compliance with CalWORKS rules. After 48 months these services or
for CalWORKS cash aid. Helping people move from poverty and significant
education gaps to full time employment in jobs that pay a high enough wage to be
self-sufficient is difficult. It can take longer than 48 months and allowing for the
flexibility to extend supportive services and training past the 48 month time limit
would help.
c. Diversion: Removing the criteria that someone has to be apparently eligible to
CalWORKs in order to qualify for diversion and base the criteria on the client’s
circumstance and ability to maintain the situation on their own without the need of
continued assistance.
When applying income and resource requirements for diversion, use only
half of their income and/or resource value or increase the limits for income
and resources for diversion only.
Increasing the amount of the diversion payment. If the applicant doesn’t
“use” all of the amount, they have 12 months to come back into the office
and apply for the remaining amount of their diversion payments.
Allowing families to reapply for CalWORKs during their diversion period
without a repayment penalty or CalWORKs ineligibility.
d. Expanding job retention services;
e. Exempting the hard-to-serve from Welfare-to-Work activities and the 20%
exemption or providing flexibility in the time limit (dependent upon terms and
conditions of TANF authorization). Developing an eligibility definition to 250% of
the federal poverty level (FPL).Currently, the CalWORKs poverty level is 130% of
the FPL for each Assistance Unit (AU). An increase to 250% would ensure more
families meet income eligibility requirements.
All of these measures would make it easier for CalWORKs families to enter employment
services, become employed, and continue with the support they need in order to maintain
their jobs.
140. SUPPORT efforts to revise the definition of “homelessness” in the Welfare & Institutions
Codes to include families who have received eviction notices due to a verified financial
hardship, thus allowing early intervention assistance for CalWORKs families. Current law
prevents CalWORKs from providing homeless assistance until the CalWORKs family is
actually “on the street.” This rule change would enable the County to work with
Formatted: Font: Italic
Attachment A--redline version
Page 44 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 24
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
CalWORKs families who are being threatened with homelessness to prevent the eviction
and, presumably, better maintain the family members’ employment status.
141. SUPPORT alignment of verification requirements for CalWORKS, CalFRESH and Medi-
Cal programs to simplify the customer experience and reduce the potential for error.
Consider letting all programs access the Federal Hub used through CalHEERs.
Currently these programs have different requirements for client verification, though they
are all benefit programs. Alignment of verifications would make program administration
more efficient and improve the client experience.
142. SUPPORT allowing all individuals in receipt of Unemployment Benefits (UIB) to be
automatically eligible for CalFresh. Applying for UI and CalFresh is duplicative because
requirements of both program are so similar. This would increase CalFresh uptake in an
efficient way.
143. SUPPORT efforts to increase CalFresh benefit amounts to better meet recipients’
nutritional needs, improve ease and accessibility of the CalFresh application and
recertification processes, and adjust CalFresh eligibility requirements to include currently
excluded populations with significant need.
144. SUPPORT efforts to restore cuts to the Supplemental Security Income/State
Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) Program, increase grant amounts that would allow
improvement of quality of life, and reinstate the annual Cost of Living Adjustment
(COLA.)
145. SUPPORT efforts to ensure funding of child care for CalWORKs and former CalWORKs
families at levels sufficient to meet demand. The State of California has not fully funded
the cost of child care for the “working poor.” Additional funding would allow more
CalWORKs and post-CalWORKs families to become and/or stay employed.
146. SUPPORT efforts to improve and expand emergency food assistance networks’ (e.g. local
food banks, food pantries) ability to procure, store, and distribute nutritious food to those
in need.
147. SUPPORT increase of daily rate available under Temporary HA from $65 per day to $85
per day for homeless CalWORKs families of four or fewer and provide an additional $15
per day for each additional family member up to a maximum of $145 daily.
148. SUPPORT efforts for a more flexible framework that allows the state to supplement
CalFresh benefits if federal assistance is insufficient or unavailable. Recent natural
disasters have underscored the need for a more permanent framework for the state to
respond.
149. SUPPORT continuous investment in the California Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC)
and efforts to increase access to California Earned Income Tax Credit, including increase
in tax credit.
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Moved (insertion) [2]
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Attachment A--redline version
Page 45 of 166
25
Deleted: Contra Costa County
150. SUPPORT the expansion of benefits and services for immigrants, refugees, and asylum
seekers.
151. SUPPORT providing funding for graduation bonuses for non-pregnant/parenting
CalWORKs students who obtain a high school diploma/equivalent.
152. SUPPORT shared housing efforts to secure permanent housing assistance for CalWORKs
participants.
153. SUPPORT a federal waiver that would allow county social services agencies to process
CalFresh applications for jail inmates and suspend rather than terminate CalFresh
eligibility when a recipient is detailed in a county jail for a period of less than a year.
154. SUPPORT efforts that would allow CalWORKs Welfare to Work participants to
participate and achieve high school equivalency program without having their 24-month
clock be impacted during their time in the program.
Early Care and Education
155. SUPPORT the efforts of CHSA (California Head Start Association) in securing legislation
to support a state-wide integrated child care licensing structure. This will allow childcare
programs to apply for and have one child care license for all children 0-5 as opposed to the
current system of a two-license structure for varying ages of children in care. California
remains only one of two states in the nation to maintain the two license structure.
156. OPPOSE legislation, rules, regulations or policies that restrict or affect the amount of funds
available to, or the local autonomy of, First 5 Commissions to allocate their funds in
accordance with local needs.
157. OPPOSE any legislation that increases tobacco taxes but fails to include language to
replace any funds subsequently lost to The California Children and Families Act/Trust
Fund for local services funded by tobacco taxes, Proposition 10 in 1998 and Proposition
99 in 1988.
158. SUPPORT efforts by the Contra Costa County’s executive directors and program
administrators of all Child Care and Development Programs to restore state budget
allocations to the FY 2009-10 levels if verified that this is an increase by fiscal analysts for
the California State Preschool Program (CSPP), California Center-Based General Child
Care Program (CCTR), CalWORKs Stage 2 (C2AP), CalWORKs Stage 3 (C3AP),
Alternate Payment Program (CAPP), Child Care and Development Grant and the Child
Care Retention Program (AB 212). Budgets in these programs have stagnated or reduced.
An increase would greatly help low-income people find work and stay in jobs.
159. SUPPORT efforts to increase the number of subsidized child care slots to address the
shortage of over 20,000 slots serving children 0-12 years of age in Contra Costa County;
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Bold, Italic, Highlight
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 46 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 26
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
and SUPPORT efforts to enhance the quality of early learning programs and maintain local
Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) for early learning providers. Affordable
child care is key to low-income workers remaining employed and there is a significant
dearth of subsidized child care slots. Increasing quality of early learning is important to
developing skills in the next generation.
160. SUPPORT legislation to expand early child care and education and increase funding for
preschool and early learning.
161. SUPPORT the restoration of funding for Facility Restoration and Repair (FRR) grants by
California Department of Education. Increasing the funding amounts for facility
restoration of early childhood education would allow for improved facilities at Head Start
sites.
162. SUPPORT legislation to expand early care and education and increase funding for
preschool and early learning, through a diverse and multi-faceted delivery system.
163. SUPPORT restoration of child development programs (pre-2011 funding) under
Proposition 98 funding.
164. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify and streamline the definition of homelessness
across categorical eligibility for child care services to homeless children.
165. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify the definition of “volunteer” in SB 792, a bill
which prohibits, commencing September 1, 2016, a person from being employed or
volunteering at a day care center or a day care home if he or she has not been immunized
against influenza, pertussis, and measles. Current law does not specify an established
minimum of time spent in a child care facility to be considered a volunteer. SB 792,
therefore, would apply to parents/grandparents coming to child care centers for one-time
volunteer activities, to provide proof of vaccination.
166. SUPPORT efforts to that would establish/allow the enrollment of 2.9 year olds in the
California State Preschool Program.
167. SUPPORT alignment of family eligibility for subsidized child care with cost of living
adjustments and higher minimum wage rates.
168. SUPPORT the restoration of State Quality Child Care Funds which funds the Local Child
Care Planning Council.
169. SUPPORT the increase in flexibility of child care contracts with the California Department
of Education that would allow voluntary transfer of funds to occur outside of November
and May months.
170. SUPPORT efforts to raise wages for the early care and education workforce (such as child
care workers, preschool/infant-toddler teachers).
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Attachment A--redline version
Page 47 of 166
27
Deleted: Contra Costa County
171. SUPPORT efforts that encourage access to early education home visiting programming -
supporting families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth and
development of their young children.
Child Welfare
172. SUPPORT continued and improved funding for substance abuse treatment and mental
health services including those that provide alternatives to incarceration and Laura’s Law.
173. SUPPORT increased funding for Foster Parent Recruitment and Retention.
174. SUPPORT continued and improved funding for implementation of Continuum of Care
Reform.
175. SUPPORT child-specific approval for kinship caregivers (and non-related extended family
members) to enable relatives to care for their related child/children, if in the child’s best
interest, even if the relative/NREFM is not able or willing to be approved as a foster parent
for their foster children.
176. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would amend the definition of “relative” as applied to
state funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payments (Kin-Gap) to be consistent with
the federally funded Kin-Gap. This will allow all Kinship guardianship cases to be treated
uniformly and allow more families to experience independence, normalcy and other
benefits of permanence as legal guardians.
177. SUPPORT counties to access CWS/CMS to determine family’s child abuse history for the
Resource Family Approval process.
178. SUPPORT efforts to expand California Earned Income Tax Credit (Cal-EITC) eligibility
to former foster youth under age 25 years.
179. SUPPORT efforts that would create state Homeless Youth Housing Program grants fund
to establish or expand programs that provide specified housing assistance and supportive
services to homeless youth.
Violence Prevention
180. SUPPORT efforts that seek to address the impact of domestic violence, sexual assault,
human trafficking, elder abuse and child abuse, and implement culturally relevant, trauma-
informed responses, connect victims to services, and prevent interpersonal violence.
181. SUPPORT increased investments in housing for victims of domestic violence and human
trafficking including the preservation of emergency and long-term housing options for
victims.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Bold, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Bold
Deleted: <#>SUPPORT the establishment of a 12-month child
care assistance and graduated phase out that allows for tapered
assistance to families whose income has increased at the time of
re-determination, but still does not exceed the federal income
limit of 85% of State Median Income.¶
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Deleted: <#>¶
<#>¶
Deleted: <#>¶
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: Font: Not Italic
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Bold, Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Normal
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Font: Bold, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Deleted: SUPPORT efforts to improve and expand
emergency food assistance networks’ (e.g. local food banks,
food pantries) ability to procure, store, and distribute nutritious
food to those in need. ¶
Formatted: Left
Deleted: and
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: domestic violence and sexual assault
Formatted: Highlight
Attachment A--redline version
Page 48 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 28
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
182. SUPPORT efforts that prevent domestic violence and domestic violence homicide
including assessment of risk for assault or lethal force (including stalking and
strangulation) throughout the criminal justice system.
183. SUPPORT investments in continuous training and coordination of training for all law
enforcement officers, District Attorneys, Public Defenders, Judges and other court staff on
issues of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, elder abuse and trauma
informed approaches.
184. SUPPORT efforts to increase training on human trafficking (with a specific focus on labor
trafficking) for law enforcement and others involved in criminal investigations.
185. SUPPORT efforts that seek to specialize and build expertise for designated staff and
systems (such as developing a commercially sexually exploited youth court or creating
human trafficking units) to better support survivors of human trafficking.
186. SUPPORT efforts that differentiate risk and provide differential response for both victims
of domestic violence and sex crimes and offenders of domestic violence and sex crimes.
187. SUPPORT efforts to increase language access and cultural responsive services for
survivors of interpersonal violence.
188. SUPPORT efforts that foster collaboration across protective and criminal systems which
allow for facilitation of cross-reporting of interpersonal violence.
189. SUPPORT efforts to increase cross-agency and cross-system collaboration on human
trafficking and domestic violence cases including the sharing of confidential or protected
information in multidisciplinary team settings in order to increase support for survivors.
190. SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools
191. SUPPORT efforts that ensure survivors of interpersonal violence feel safe to access
services.
Indian Gaming Issues
Contra Costa County is currently home to the Lytton Band of the Pomo Indians’ Casino in San Pablo, a Class II
gaming facility. There has been a proposal for an additional casino in North Richmond. Local governments have
limited authority in determining whether or not such facilities should be sited in their jurisdiction; the terms and
conditions under which the facilities will operate; and what, if any, mitigation will be paid to offset the cost of
increased services and lost revenues. Contra Costa County has been active in working with CSAC and others to
address these issues, as well as the need for funding for participation in the federal and state review processes and
for mitigation for the existing Class II casino.
192. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that counties who have existing or proposed Class II Indian
gaming facilities receive the Special Distribution Funds.
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Deleted: ¶
SUPPORT a federal waiver that would allow county social
services agencies to process CalFresh applications for jail inmates
and suspend rather than terminate CalFresh eligibility when a
recipient is detailed in a county jail for a period of less than a
year.¶
¶
SUPPORT efforts that would allow CalWORKs Welfare to Work
participants to participate and achieve high school equivalency
program without having their 24-month clock be impacted during
their time in the program. ¶
¶
SUPPORT increase of daily rate available under Temporary HA
from $65 per day to $85 per day for homeless CalWORKs
families of four or fewer and provide an additional $15 per day
for each additional family member up to a maximum of $145
daily.¶
¶
SUPPORT research that describes and assesses local service
needs and gaps impacting aging residents and that proposes
specific and actionable local strategies to address these needs. ¶
¶
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Moved up [2]: SUPPORT increase of daily rate available
from $65 per day to $85 per day for homeless CalWORKs
families of four or fewer and provide an additional $15 per day
for each additional family member up to a maximum of $145
daily.
Moved up [1]: SUPPORT legislation and investments related
to long-term care, senior housing affordability, medical service
access, transportation, isolation and other quality of life issues to
support aging with dignity.¶
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 49 of 166
29
Deleted: Contra Costa County
193. CONSIDER, on a case by case basis, whether or not to SUPPORT or OPPOSE Indian
gaming facilities in Contra Costa County, and only SUPPORT facilities that are unique in
nature and can demonstrate significant community benefits above and beyond the costs
associated with mitigating community impacts.
194. OPPOSE the expansion or approval of Class III gaming machines at the existing gaming
facility in Contra Costa County unless it can be demonstrated that there would be
significant community benefits above and beyond the costs associated with mitigating
community impacts.
195. SUPPORT State authority to tighten up the definition of a Class II machine.
196. SUPPORT State legislative and administration actions consistent with the CSAC policy
documents on development on Indian Lands and Compact negotiations for Indian gaming.
Land Use/Community Development
197. SUPPORT efforts to promote economic incentives for "smart growth," in Priority
Development and Priority Production Areas including in-fill and transit-oriented
development. Balancing the need for housing and economic growth with the urban limit
line requirements of Measure J (2004) will rely on maximum utilization of “smart growth”
and Sustainable Community Strategy principles. Priority Production Areas are locally
designated zones where manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and repair services
would be a priority consideration in determining future land use.
198. SUPPORT efforts to increase the supply of affordable housing, including, but not limited
to, state issuance of private activity bonds, affordable and low income housing bond
measures, low-income housing tax credits and state infrastructure financing. This position
supports a number of goals in the County General Plan Housing Element.
199. SUPPORT establishment of a CEQA exemption for affordable housing financing. Current
law provides a statutory exemption from CEQA to state agencies for financing of
affordable housing (Section 21080.10(b) of the California Public Resources Code and
Section 15267 of the CEQA Guidelines)—but not to local agencies. The current exemption
for state agencies is only operational if a CEQA review process has been completed by
another agency (e.g., by the land use permitting agency). Since the act of financing does
not change the environmental setting, the net effect of the exemption is streamlining the
process for providing financial assistance for already approved projects. AB 2518
(Houston) in 2006 was a Contra Costa County-sponsored bill to accomplish this, but it
was not successful in the Legislature.
200. SUPPORT efforts to obtain a CEQA exemption or to utilize CEQA streamlining provisions
for infill development or Priority Development Areas, including in unincorporated areas.
Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines is a Categorical Exemption for infill development
Attachment A--redline version
Page 50 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 30
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
projects but only within cities or unincorporated areas of a certain size surrounded by cities.
Without the exemption, housing projects in the unincorporated areas that are not
surrounded by cities (e.g. North Richmond, Montalvin Manor and Rodeo) are subject to a
more time-consuming and costly process in order to comply with the CEQA guidelines than
that which is required of cities, despite having similar housing obligations. The CEQA
exemption bill signed by the Governor in 2013 (SB 741) only applies to mixed-use or non-
residential projects in the unincorporated areas that are both within ½ mile of a BART
station and within the boundaries of an adopted Specific Plan.
201. SUPPORT efforts to reform State housing element law to promote the actual production
and preservation of affordable housing and to focus less on process and paper compliance.
202. OPPOSE efforts to limit the County’s ability to exercise local land use authority.
203. SUPPORT efforts to reduce the fiscalization of land use decision-making by local
government, which favors retail uses over other job-creating uses and housing. Reducing
incentives for inappropriate land use decisions, particularly those that negatively affect
neighboring jurisdictions, could result in more rational and harmonious land use.
204. SUPPORT allocations, appropriations, and policies that support and leverage the benefits
of approved Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs), such as the East Contra
Costa County NCCP. Support the granting of approximately $24 million to the East Contra
Costa County NCCP from the $90 million allocation for NCCPs in Proposition 84. Support
the inclusion of NCCPs for funding in allocations from Proposition 1. Support $90 million
for implementation of NCCPs and an additional $100 million for watershed protection and
habitat conservation in future park, water or natural resource bonds. Support the position
that NCCPs are an effective strategy for addressing the impacts of climate change and
encourage appropriate recognition of the NCCP tool in implementation of climate change
legislation such as SB 375, AB 32 as well as an appropriate tool for spending Cap and
Trade revenues. Promote effective implementation of NCCPs as a top priority for the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Support an increase to $1.6 million for the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Local Assistance Grant program. Support
efforts to streamline implementation of NCCPs including exemptions from unnecessary
regulatory oversight such as the Delta Plan Covered Actions process administered by the
Delta Stewardship Council. Support alignment of State and Regional of Water Board
permits (Section 401 clean water act and storm water permits) and California Department
of Fish and Wildlife Streambed Alteration Agreement (Section 1602 of the Fish and Game
code) and other State natural resource permitting with California Endangered Species Act
permitting through NCCPs to improve the overall efficiency, predictability and
effectiveness of natural resource regulation.
205. SUPPORT legislation that would give local agencies specific tools for economic
development purposes in order to enhance job opportunities, with emphasis on attracting
and retaining businesses, blight removal and promoting smart growth and affordable
housing development, while balancing the impacts on revenues for health and safety
programs and healthy communities.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 51 of 166
31
Deleted: Contra Costa County
206. SUPPORT legislation that would resolve the administrative funding gap for agencies
serving as the Successor Housing Agency. Such legislation should not have a negative
impact on the localities’ general fund. The Redevelopment Dissolution Act allows
Successor Agencies a modest allowance of tax increment funds to support Successor
Agency administrative costs. There is no such carve out for Housing Successors. However,
unlike Successor Agencies, Housing Successors have an ongoing obligation to monitor
existing affordable housing developments. These obligations will continue for up to 55
years.
207. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify the ability of successor agencies to former
redevelopment agencies to enter into contracts with its sponsoring jurisdiction and third
parties to fulfill enforceable obligations. The existing redevelopment dissolution statute
limits the contracting powers of successor agencies which is causing delays in their ability
to expeditiously retire certain enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment
agencies.
208. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that streamline compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by integrating it with other environmental protection
laws and regulations, modifying the tiering of environmental reviews, expanding the
application of prior environmental reviews, focusing areas of potential CEQA litigation,
and enhancing public disclosure and accountability.
209. OPPOSE CEQA reform efforts that reduce environmental protections for projects that
cross county or city boundaries.
210. SUPPORT efforts to improve or streamline CEQA for efficiency without losing sight of
its ultimate goal to thoroughly identify environmental impacts and mitigations.
211. OPPOSE efforts to change CEQA solely to accommodate one particular infrastructure
project or set of projects.
212. SUPPORT legislation that amends Section 20133 of the Public Contract Code to 1) delete
the existing sunset date of July 1, 2014 for design-build authority granted to counties, and
2) eliminate the current project cost threshold of $2.5 million required for the use of the
design-build method.
213. SUPPORT legislation that funds programs to remediate brownfield sites in the County and
modifies existing programs to make implementation easier or apply more broadly.
Specifically:
Consider modification to the Cleanup Loans and Environmental Assistance to
Neighborhoods (CLEAN) program that would simply the approval process for
applications;
Broaden the criteria for sites that are eligible for California Land Reuse and
Revitalization Act (CLRRA) to include all sites that are listed by the State or
Federal Government as contaminated; and
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at:
0.75" + Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Attachment A--redline version
Page 52 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 32
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
Fully fund the California Recycle Underutilized Sites (CALReUse) program.
Law and Justice System
214. SUPPORT legislation that seeks to curb metal theft by making it easier for law enforcement
agencies to track stolen metals sold to scrap dealers through such means as requiring
identification from customers selling commonly stolen metals, banning cash transactions
over a certain amount, and requiring scrap dealers to hold materials they buy for a certain
period of time before melting them down or reselling them.
215. SUPPORT legislation that provides a practical and efficient solution to addressing the
problem of abandoned and trespassing vessels and ground tackle in an administrative
process that allows the California State Lands Commission to both remove and dispose of
such vessels and unpermitted ground tackle. Boat owners in increasing numbers are
abandoning both recreational and commercial vessels in areas within the Commission’s
jurisdiction. Our state waterways are becoming clogged with hulks that break up, leak,
sink and add pollutants to our waterways and marine habitat.
216. SUPPORT legislation that requires boater’s insurance. Currently, boaters are not required
to carry insurance in California.
217. SUPPORT legislation that provides better funding for local agencies forced to deal with
abandoned and sunken vessels and their environmental impacts.
218. OPPOSE legislative proposals to realign additional program responsibility to counties
without adequate funding and protections.
219. OPPOSE legislation that would shift the responsibility of parolees from the state to the
counties without adequate notification, documentation and funding.
220. SUPPORT legislation that will help counties implement the 2011 Public Safety
Realignment as long as the proposal would: provide for county flexibility, eliminate
redundant or unnecessary reporting, and would not transfer more responsibility without
funding.
221. SUPPORT legislation that will combat the negative impact that human trafficking has on
victims in our communities, including the impact that this activity has on a range of County
services and supports, and support efforts to provide additional tools, resources and funding
to help counties address this growing problem.
222. ADVOCATE for State legislation banning the sale of alcopop products by businesses that
sell alcoholic beverages. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control is
responsible for regulating the type of alcohol products that a business may sell. A type of
flavored malt alcoholic beverage product known as “alcopops” has been identified as a
contributor to under-age drinking in the County. The term alcopops usually refers to
sweetened malt or alcoholic beverages that are typically sold in single-serving bottles or
Commented [LD6]: Recommended by HMC.
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 53 of 166
33
Deleted: Contra Costa County
cans. The Board, through recommendations from the Public Protection Committee, has
adopted amendments to the Alcoholic Beverage Sales Commercial Activities Zoning
Ordinance that authorizes the County to prohibit the sale of alcopops at any establishment
not in compliance with the performance standards. Along with the code changes, various
implementation strategies were also approved in order to better coordinate efforts between
County Departments and agencies for streamlined implementation and enforcement of the
Ordinance.
223. SUPPORT legislative reform of current bail provisions that will replace reliance on money
bail with a system that incorporates a pretrial risk assessment tool and evidence-based
pretrial release decisions. The current reliance on fixed bail schedules and commercial
money bonds ignores public safety factors and unfairly penalizes poor people who are
awaiting trial. Bail reform in this manner will ensure that only dangerous persons who
cannot be safely supervised in the community while they are awaiting trial will be held in
custody pretrial. Locally, our County has moved in this direction with an AB109 funded
pretrial program.
Levees
224. ADVOCATE for administrative and legislative action to provide significant funding for
rehabilitation of levees in the western and central Delta. Proposition 1E, passed in
November 2006, provides for over $3 billion for levees, primarily those in the Central
Valley Flood Control Program. Language is included in the bond for other Delta levees
but funding is not specifically directed. The County will work to actively advocate for $1
billion in funding through this bond.
225. SUPPORT legislation that requires the levee repair funds generated by Proposition 1E be
spent within one year or legislative hearings conducted on expediting the expenditure of
bond proceeds through the Department of Water Resources Delta Levees Section. Many
public agencies, including reclamation districts charged with maintaining levees, have
complained about the state’s inaction in allocating and distributing the levee funds that
were raised by the bond sales authorized by Proposition 1E in 2008. Legislation could
require the immediate distribution of these funds to local levee projects. The Delta Reform
Act of 2009 authorized over $202 million for levee repairs. Legislative hearings may
produce explanations from the state as to why these funds are not being distributed or
identify methods to streamline administration of these funds.
226. SUPPORT legislation to amend California Water Code Section 12986, to maintain the
state/local funding ratio of 75/25 for the state’s Delta Levees Subventions Program, which
provides funds for local levee repair and maintenance projects. The code provisions that
have the state paying 75% of project costs will expire on July 1, 2013. At that time the
matching ratio will change to 50/50. This means local reclamation districts will have to pay
a larger portion of project costs (50%, compared to their current 25% requirement). Many
districts do not have the funding to do so. The Delta Levees Subventions Program should
continue to use funds from bonds or other dedicated sources, rather than the state’s General
Fund. For the past several years the program has been funded from bonds. When these
Attachment A--redline version
Page 54 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 34
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
bond funds run out, the program will have to be funded from the General Fund, unless
some other new dedicated funding source is established.
227. ADVOCATE for legislation dealing with the Delta, including levees and levee programs,
level and type of flood protection, beneficiary-pays programs, flood insurance, liability and
other levee/land use issues.
228. SUPPORT legislation/regulation requiring Reclamation Districts to develop, publish, and
maintain hazard emergency plans for their districts. Emergency response plans are critical
to emergency management, particularly in an area or situation like the Delta where a levee
break could trigger other emergencies. This legislation/regulation should also include the
requirement for plan review and annual distribution of the plan to the residents of the
district, County Office of Emergency Services and other government agencies that have
emergency response interests within the district.
229. SUPPORT legislation to amend California Water Code Section 85057.5 to bring the Delta
Stewardship Council’s “covered actions” land-use review process into consistency with
CEQA. This section of state code defines a “covered action,” which refers to local permit
decisions that are subject to potential revocation by the Council, as adopted in the Council’s
Delta Plan. The proposed process works as follows: (1) if a local permit application meets
the definition of a “covered action,” the jurisdiction must evaluate it for consistency with
all of the policies in the Council’s Delta Plan. (2) If the jurisdiction finds the project is
consistent with the Delta Plan, they notify the Council of this finding. (3) Anyone who
objects to the project may appeal the consistency finding, and it will be up to the Council
to make the final decision. Should the Council decide against the local jurisdiction, there
is no appeal process available to the jurisdiction or project applicant other than legal action .
“Covered actions” are defined in Section 85057.5 of the California Water Code. It defines
them as plans, projects or programs as defined by CEQA, and then goes on to grant several
exemptions to certain types of projects. It does not, however, provide exemptions for all
the project types that CEQA itself exempts. CEQA provides a lengthy list of categorical
exemptions for plans, projects and programs that generally do not have significant
environmental impacts, and projects that have compelling reasons to move forward quickly
(such as public safety projects). The entire list of categorical exemptions from CEQA also
should be exempt from the Delta Stewardship Council’s “covered actions” process.
Library
230. SUPPORT State financial assistance in the operation of public libraries, including full
funding of the Public Library Fund (PLF) and the Direct/Interlibrary Loan (Transaction
Based Reimbursement) program.
231. SUPPORT State bonds for public library construction. The 2000 library construction bond
provided funding for two libraries in Contra Costa County. There is currently a need of
Attachment A--redline version
Page 55 of 166
35
Deleted: Contra Costa County
approximately $289,000,000 for public library construction, expansion and renovation in
Contra Costa County.
232. SUPPORT continued funding for the California Library Literacy and English Acquisition
Services Program, which provides matching funds for public library adult literacy
programs that offer free, confidential, one-on-one basic literacy instruction to English-
speaking adults who want to improve their reading, writing, and spelling skills.
Pipeline Safety
233. SUPPORT legislation that contains specific mitigations or solutions for installation of
Automatic Shutoff Valves for both High Consequence Areas (HCA) and for those that
transverse Active Seismic Earthquake Faults for all intrastate petroleum pipelines. State
Fire Marshal Annual Inspections of all Intrastate Petroleum Pipelines do not contain the
specific mitigations or solutions for installation of Automatic Shutoff Valves for both High
Consequence Areas (HCA) and for those that traverse Active Seismic Earthquake Faults
that are mandated for Gas Pipelines under AB 2856. The County has several petroleum
pipelines that should be classified under these categories and present the same explosive
nature as gas pipelines do.
234. SUPPORT legislation that contains specific language for protection of all seasonal and all
year creeks and all State Waterways where petroleum pipelines are present. New and
replacement pipelines near environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas should use
the best available technology including, but not limited to, the installation of leak detection
technology, automatic shutoff systems or remote controlled sectionalized block valves, or
any combination of these technologies to reduce the amount of oil released in an oil spill
to protect state waters and wildlife.
Telecommunications and Broadband
235. SUPPORT clean-up legislation on AB 2987 that provides for local emergency notifications
similar to provisions in cable franchises for the last 20 years. Currently our franchises
require the cable systems to carry emergency messages in the event of local emergencies.
With the occurrence of several local refinery incidents, this service is critical for Contra
Costa. Under federal law, Emergency Alert System requirements leave broad discretion to
broadcasters to decide when and what information to broadcast, emergency management
offices to communicate with the public in times of emergencies.
236. SUPPORT preservation of local government ownership and control of the local public
rights-of-way. Currently, local government has authority over the time, place, and manner
in which infrastructure is placed in their rights-of-way. The California Public Utilities
Commission is considering rulemaking that would give them jurisdiction to decide issues
between local government and telecommunication providers.
Deleted: <#>SUPPORT legislation that that requires the same
standards for installation of Automatic Shutoff Valves or Remote
Controlled Sectionalized Block Valves of owners and operators
of intrastate petroleum pipelines located in High Consequence
Areas or that traverse Active Seismic Earthquake Faults. These
standards should provide the location of existing valves and the
proposed location of new valves to the State Fire Marshal’s
Office allowing their interaction with the process, to establish
action timelines, to adopt standards for how to prioritize
installation, to ensure that valves are installed as quickly as
reasonably possible and to establish ongoing procedures for
monitoring progress in achieving requirements.¶
Commented [LD7]: Recommended deletion by HMC.
Deleted: <#>¶
<#>¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 56 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 36
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
237. SUPPORT the expansion of broadband (high speed internet service) to drive economic
development and job opportunities, support county service delivery, and improve health,
education and public safety outcomes for residents. For communities to realize these full
benefits of broadband it must be capable of supporting current technology.
Access and adoption are both necessary elements that should be supported in state and
federal legislative or regulatory proposals. This entails the following:
• Establishing and maintaining reliable broadband in unserved or underserved
communities;
• Promoting the knowledge, skills and behaviors that comprise digital literacy;
• Making broadband affordable for all households;
• Maximizing funding for infrastructure; and
• Reducing infrastructure deployment barriers.
Transportation
238. SUPPORT increased flexibility in the use of transportation funds.
239. SUPPORT regional coordination that provides for local input in addressing transportation
needs. Coordinated planning and delivery of public transit, paratransit, non-
profit/community-based transit, and rail services will help ensure the best possible service
delivery to the public. Regional coordination will be essential to complete planning and
development of important regional transportation projects that benefit the state and local
road system such as TriLink (State Route 239), improvements to Vasco Road, completion
of remaining segments of the Bay Trail, improvements to the Delta DeAnza Regional Trail,
and the proposed California Delta and Marsh Creek Trails. There may be interest in
seeking enhanced local input requirements for developing the Sustainable Communities
Strategy for the Bay Area mandated by SB 375 for greenhouse gas reduction. It is
important that the regional coordination efforts are based on input gathered from the local
level, to ensure the regional approach does not negatively impact local communities.
“Top-down” regional or state planning efforts would be inconsistent with this goal.
Consistent with that position, relief from the requirements imposed on the County by the
state relative to the Iron Horse corridor would foster coordination along this multi-
jurisdictional corridor.
240. SUPPORT efforts to improve safety throughout the transportation system. The County
supports new and expanded projects and programs to improve safety for bicyclists,
pedestrians and wheelchair users, as well as projects to improve safety on high-accident
transportation facilities such as Vasco Road. Data on transportation safety would be
improved by including global positioning system (GPS) location data for every reported
accident to assist in safety analysis and planning. The County also supports the expansion
of school safety improvement programs such as stable/dedicated funding for crossing
guards, revised school zone references in the vehicle code, Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S)
grants, statutory authorization of an automated safety enforcement (speed cameras) pilot
program, efforts to improve the safety, expansion and security of freight transportation
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: Regional coordination also will be needed to
effectively deal with the traffic impacts of Indian gaming casinos
such as those in West County.
Deleted: also
Deleted: .
Deleted:
Attachment A--redline version
Page 57 of 166
37
Deleted: Contra Costa County
system including public and private maritime ports, airports, rail yards, railroad lines, rail
bridges and sidings. The County also supports limits or elimination of public liability for
installing traffic-calming devices on residential neighborhood streets.
241. SUPPORT funding or incentives for the use of environmentally-friendly resources in
transportation construction projects. The County seeks and supports grant programs, tax
credits for manufacturers, state purchasing programs, and other incentives for local
jurisdictions to use renewable and environmentally friendly materials such as pervious
concrete, cool pavements, rubberized asphalt (made from recycled tires) that the County
has used as paving material on San Pablo Dam Road and Pacheco Boulevard, and other
emerging technologies/materials.
242. SUPPORT streamlining the delivery of transportation safety projects. The length of time
and amount of paperwork should be reduced to bring a transportation safety project more
quickly through the planning, engineering and design, environmental review, funding
application, and construction phases, such as for Vasco Road. This could include
streamlining the environmental review process and also streamlining all state permitting
requirements that pertain to transportation projects. Realistic deadlines for use of federal
transportation funds would help local jurisdictions deliver complex projects without
running afoul of federal time limits which are unrealistically tight for complex projects.
243. SUPPORT efforts to coordinate development of state-funded or regulated facilities such as
courts, schools, jails, roads and state offices with local planning. The County supports
preserving the authority of Public Works over County roads by way of ensuring the Board
of Supervisors’ control over County roads as established in the Streets & Highways Code
(Ch2 §940) is not undermined. This includes strongly opposing any action by a non-local
entity that would ultimately dilute current Board of Supervisors discretion relative to road
design and land use. In addition to being coordinated with local planning, there are well
documented conflicts between state school development policies and state policies related
to greenhouse gas reduction, safe routes to school, complete streets, and “Health In All
Policies.” The County supports administrative and legislative efforts to resolve these
conflicts.
244. SUPPORT efforts to coordinate planning between school districts, the state, and local
jurisdictions for the purposes of: (1) locating and planning new schools, (2) funding
programs that foster collaboration and joint use of facilities, and (3) financing off-site
transportation improvements for improved access to existing schools. The County will urge
the California Department of Education’s current Title 5 update effort to include removing
the current conflict between current school siting policies and sustainable communities.
Related to this effort, the County supports reform of school siting practices by way of
legislative changes related to any new statewide school construction bond authorization.
The County takes the position that reform components should include bringing school
siting practices and school zone references in the vehicle code into alignment with local
growth management policies, safe routes to school best practices, State SB 375 principles,
and the State Strategic Growth Council’s “Health in All Policies Initiative.”
Deleted: renewable
Deleted: the
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD8]: Submitted by John Cunningham, DCD.
Formatted: Font: Italic
Attachment A--redline version
Page 58 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 38
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
245. SUPPORT regional aviation transportation planning efforts for coordinated aviation
network planning to improve service delivery. Regional aviation coordination could also
improve the surrounding surface transportation system by providing expanded local
options for people and goods movement.
246. SUPPORT efforts to increase waterborne transport of goods and obtaining funds to support
this effort. The San Francisco to Stockton Ship Channel is a major transportation route
for the region, providing water access to a large number of industries and the Ports of
Sacramento and Stockton. A project is underway to deepen the channel, providing
additional capacity to accommodate increasing commerce needs of the Ports and
providing better operational flexibility for the other industries. Increased goods movement
via waterways has clear benefits to congestion management on highways and railroads
(with resultant air quality benefits).
247. SUPPORT legislative and administrative measures to enhance rail safety, increase state
oversight of railroad bridges, provide funding for the training of first responders, and
implement regulations that increase tank car safety standards for cars transporting crude
oil and other hazardous materials, and regulations that require railroads to share data with
state emergency managers and local responders.
248. SUPPORT funding increases for active transportation projects and planning. Funding is
needed for improved pedestrian infrastructure and enhancements and expansion of: trails,
on-street bike facilities (Class II and III), and separated facilities (Class I and Class IV
[cycle track]). Funding is also needed for corridor and ”bicycle superhighway” planning,
trail access improvements, overcrossings, intersection improvements, Class I - IV inter-
connectivity projects (gap closures), wayfinding/signage projects, and facilities/designs
identified in emerging best practices.
249. OPPOSE efforts to condition or link the distribution of transportation funds to a
jurisdiction’s production of housing relative to RHNA (Regional Housing Needs
Allocation).
250. SUPPORT administrative or legislative mechanisms that facilitate coordination between
transportation agencies and utilities relative to expediting construction projects. Without
willing and proactive coordination, transportation projects are subject to delays and
substantially increased costs. These costs are borne by the taxpayers.
Veterans
251. SUPPORT legislation and budget actions that will continue the state's annual local
assistance for County Veterans Service Offices at a minimum of the $5.6 million
level. The eventual goal is to fully fund CVSOs by appropriating the full $11 million in
local assistance funding as reflected in Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1(d).
County Veterans Service Offices (CVSOs) play a vital role in the local veteran community,
not only within the Veterans Affairs claims process, but in other aspects as well. This
includes providing information about all veterans’ benefits (Federal, State and local), as
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Commented [LD9]: Submitted by PW. Approved by TWIC.
Formatted: Font: Not Italic, Highlight
Formatted: No bullets or numbering
Deleted: ¶
¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 59 of 166
39
Deleted: Contra Costa County
well as providing claims assistance for all veteran-related benefits, referring veterans to
ancillary community resources, providing hands-on development and case management
services for claims and appeals and transporting local veterans to VA facilities.
252. SUPPORT legislation and budget actions that will provide veterans organizations with
resources to make necessary repairs to, or replacement of, their meeting halls and facilities.
Across California, the meeting halls and posts of Veterans Service Organizations such as
the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars serve as unofficial community centers.
Many of these facilities are not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act
accessibility standards, are not earthquake retrofitted, or have deteriorated in recent years
due to declining membership and reduced rental revenues as a result of the economic
downturn. The County will support legislation that would create a competitive grant
program for veterans’ organizations, classified by the IRS as 501c19 non-profit
organizations and comprised primarily of past or present members of the United States
Armed Forces and their family members, to use for repairs and improvements to their
existing facilities.
253. SUPPORT legislation that will improve the timeliness and quality of both VA benefits
claim decisions and VA healthcare services. Specifically, legislation that works toward
improving on the expedited processing of claims, providing VA healthcare, and
administering of benefits to populations with unique needs, such as homeless Veterans,
Women Veterans, and Veterans experiencing service related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
or service related Traumatic Brain Injury.
Waste Management
254. SUPPORT legislation that establishes producer responsibility for management at the end
of their useful life of products, including pharmaceuticals, batteries, sharps and veterinary
medicine.
255. SUPPORT efforts to increase the development of markets for recycled materials.
256. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts to allow third parties, under specific
circumstances and conditions, to collect and transport household hazardous waste to
collection facilities.
257. SUPPORT legislation that seeks to remedy the environmental degradation and solid waste
management problems on a State-wide basis of polystyrene containers and single-use
plastic bags typically given away for free at grocery, retail and other establishments.
258. SUPPORT legislation that does not require increased diversion from landfills without an
adequate funding mechanism.
259. SUPPORT legislation that would make changes to the used tire redemption program.
Instead of collecting a disposal fee from the consumer when new tires are purchased, a
disposal fee would be collected at the wholesale level and redeemed by the disposal site
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redline version
Page 60 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 40
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: January 17, 2017
when the used tires are brought to the site. The party bringing the tires to the disposal site
would also receive a portion of the fee.
260. SUPPORT legislation that relieves counties with privately-operated landfills from the state
requirement for maintaining a 15-year supply of disposal capacity for waste generated
within each county. In 1989, Contra Costa County amended its general plan to
accommodate construction of Keller Canyon Landfill. Due to the difficulty in siting
landfills and the requirements of Public Resources Code 47100 – Countywide Siting
Element, the County maintained authority to control the amount of waste disposed at this
facility from outside the county. Despite Contra Costa County’s opposition, AB 845
became law on January 1, 2013 and prohibits any jurisdiction from regulating the amount
of waste disposed at a privately-operated landfill based on its place of origin.
Because local jurisdictions can no longer control importation of waste to privately-
operated landfills, a host County that receives a significant amount of waste from outside
the county will have a greater need to undertake the difficult task of identifying new
disposal capacity pursuant to the Countywide Siting Element requirement. Since the state
believes there is no need for local jurisdictions to regulate disposal of solid waste by place
of origin, the state should remove existing statutes that require each County with privately-
operated landfills to identify sufficient disposal capacity for the waste generated by the
jurisdictions within that County.
261. SUPPORT legislation that can reduce the amount of harmful pharmaceuticals (including
veterinary medicine) that ultimately enter waste water treatment facilities, bodies of water,
and landfills.
262. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts to restrict payments from the Beverage
Container Recycling Program Fund for redemption of beverage containers sold out of state.
Fraudulent redemption of these beverage containers is costing the Fund from $40 million
to $200 million annually. This fraud combined with loans to the General Fund to reduce
the State budget deficit has significantly reduced the availability of funds for increasing
recycling as intended under the law.
263. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that correct the imbalance between the
County’s regulatory authority to control the collection and disposal of solid waste
generated within the unincorporated areas and our exposure to state penalties for failing to
meet state mandates for diverting solid waste generated within these areas as a result of
Appellate Court decisions. In litigation where the County sought to protect its solid waste
franchise authority for unincorporated areas the court awarded franchise authority to the
Rodeo Sanitary District and Mountain View Sanitary District while the County remains
exposed to state penalties for failing to meet state mandates for reducing disposal of solid
waste generated in these areas.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 61 of 166
41
Deleted: Contra Costa County
Workforce Development
264. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that make the necessary changes to existing
law for the implementation of the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) in California. The County supports legislation that would include provisions that
state that the Local Plan developed by local workforce boards should be the basis of all
workforce planning in the local areas and all workforce-related state grants. Additionally,
the County supports provisions that ensure that staffing costs and support services should
be included in the training expenditure requirement. Finally, the County supports
provisions that require all programs listed in the Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act
(WIOA) work together to ensure that data is collected and reported across all programs,
utilizing the state’s base-wage file system to ease local reporting burdens.
265. SUPPORT efforts to include marginally attached workers, including discouraged workers,
and involuntary part-time workers more formally in the California Workforce Investment
Act.
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD10]: Submitted by EHSD.
Attachment A--redline version
Page 62 of 166
2018 DRAFT
STATE LEGISLATIVE
PLATFORM
Contra Costa County
December 11, 2017
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 63 of 166
1
Table of Contents
COUNTY-SPONSORED LEGISLATION ............................................................................................... 2
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY ADVOCACY PRIORITIES ............................................................. 2
STATE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS .......................................................................................... 5
Agriculture................................................................................................................................................. 5
Animal Services ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Child Support Services .............................................................................................................................. 7
Climate Change ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Delta Water Platform ................................................................................................................................ 9
Elections .................................................................................................................................................... 9
Emergency Preparedness, Emergency Response ................................................................................... 10
Eminent Domain ..................................................................................................................................... 10
Flood Control and Clean Water............................................................................................................... 11
General Revenues/Finance ..................................................................................................................... 11
Health Care ............................................................................................................................................. 13
Human Services ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Indian Gaming ......................................................................................................................................... 28
Land Use/Community Development ....................................................................................................... 29
Law and Justice System ........................................................................................................................... 32
Levees...................................................................................................................................................... 33
Library……………………………………………………………………………………………………… .......................................... 34
Pipeline Safety……………………………………………………………………………………………….. ................................... 35
Telecommunications and Broadband ..................................................................................................... 35
Transportation ........................................................................................................................................ 36
Veterans .................................................................................................................................................. 38
Waste Management................................................................................................................................ 39
Workforce Development ........................................................................................................................ 41
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 64 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 2
2018 STATE LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Each year, the Board of Supervisors adopts a State Legislative Platform that establishes priorities
and policy positions with regard to potential State legislation and regulation. The State Legislative
Platform includes County-sponsored bill proposals, legislative or regulatory advocacy priorities
for the year, and policies that provide direction and guidance for identification of and advocacy
on bills which would affect the services, programs or finances of Contra Costa County.
COUNTY-SPONSORED LEGISLATION
West Contra Costa Healthcare District (SB 522)
Given the District’s limited funding and change in operations, legislation that would allow the
Board of Supervisors to appoint the District’s governing body is necessary and appropriate. It
would eliminate the cost of elections and foster collaboration between the District and the County
as these two public agencies work together to meet the medical needs of District residents. On
August 1, 2017, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to seek legislation
to change the District’s Board of Directors from an elected board to one appointed by the Board
of Supervisors. The District’s governing body also supports this change. A bill has been
introduced to accomplish this, SB 522, and will be considered in January 2018.
LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY ADVOCACY PRIORITIES
Each year, issues emerge through the legislative process that are of importance to the County and
require advocacy efforts. For 2018, it is anticipated that critical issues requiring legislative
advocacy will include the following:
Priority 1: State Budget – The state’s continuing economic recovery, prior budget cuts, and the
additional, temporary taxes provided by Proposition 30 have combined to bring the State Budget
to a much improved financial condition. While the Governor's Budget identifies cost pressures
and budget risks in health and human services programs, of particular concern to counties is the
inadequate reimbursement for our ever-increasing cost of operating several human services
programs: the “Human Services Funding Deficit,” formerly referred to as the “Cost of Doing
Business.” The annual shortfall between actual county expenses and state reimbursement has
grown to over $1 billion since 2001, creating a de facto cost shift to counties. The funding gap
forces counties to reduce services to vulnerable populations and/or divert scarce county resources
from other critical local services. It also increases the risk of state and federal penalties.
Due to the restructuring of In-home Supportive Services (IHSS) funding in the State Budget (SB
90), the new Maintenance of Effort will shift program costs to counties; Contra Costa County
anticipates a resultant decrease in IHSS administration funding. At the same time, the County
anticipates that IHSS caseloads and authorized hours per case will continue to increase. In Contra
Costa County, the number of caseloads increased by 16% from FY 2013-14 to FY 2016-17; the
number of providers grew by 13%; and average authorized hours per case increased by 19%. The
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 65 of 166
3
new proposed administrative funding is not expected to match the growing need for increased
administration time and support needed to meet the demand of the growing IHSS population.
Anticipated negotiations for the FY 2019-2020 State budget will re-examine the funding structure
for IHSS and determine the sustainability of county revenues and programs.
Priority 2: Health Care – Counties play a critical role in California’s health reform efforts.
Counties serve as employers, payers, and providers of care to vulnerable populations.
Consequently, counties actively participate in discussions of how to best reform and preserve the
health care system in California and implement the national health care reform legislation passed
in 2010, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The optional Medi-Cal Expansion, in effect on Jan. 1, 2014, was a significant part of the State
Budget process in 2013. The ACA had required states to expand Medicaid programs to allow
childless adults at or below 138 percent of poverty to be eligible for Medicaid (known as Medi-
Cal in California). The Supreme Court struck down that mandate but allowed it to be an option for
states, which California exercised.
However, significant unknowns remain including questions about the actual impact of the ACA
coverage expansions on counties and the number of uninsured individuals to whom counties will
still need to provide services. Counties will retain the Section 17000 responsibility, and there will
be significant variations in the impacts of both the ACA and AB 85 for the different types of
counties: county hospital (12 counties including Contra Costa County), payor/clinic and County
Medical Services Program (CMSP) counties.
The County will continue to work on the implementation of required health care reform measures
to maximize federal revenue. The County will support efforts to provide counties with the
necessary tools to implement health care reform which may include performing eligibility and
enrollment, preserving existing county resources from 1991 Realignment, providing for a smooth
transition for the various operational systems, and supporting legislation to ensure that low-income
families are covered under the Affordable Care Act while opposing legislation which would reduce
Medi-Cal eligibility. In addition, the County will continue to work to reduce uncompensated
health care costs, work on the adequacy of rates under the new health care system, and advocate
for adequate state funding for community-based health and social service networks to improve
service coordination, health outcomes and quality of life.
Priority 3: Water and Levees /The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta – The enactment of the Delta
Reform Act (2009), a bill that established the co-equal goals for reliable water supply and
ecosystem restoration for the Delta, created the Delta Stewardship Council, and supported the
proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) --an effort to construct a pair of massive tunnels
under the Delta-- will bring significant, large-scale change to the Delta as we know it. The scope
and content of these changes, as well as enduring political battles between northern and southern
California over water, will continue to guide legislative and administrative agendas in the coming
year. Enabling legislation was also passed in 2009 for a state water bond, which was delayed from
the 2010 and 2012 ballots but successfully passed on the 2014 state ballot, as Proposition 1.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 66 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 4
Significant future impacts on the County in the areas of water quality and supply, levee stability,
ecosystem health, local land use authority and flood control are anticipated.
Particular areas of concern for 2018 include, but are not limited to: (1) the ongoing development
of the BDCP project, now recast as the California WaterFix (CWF) and whether the state water
bond appropriates funds specific to the BDCP/CWF; and (2) the impacts of the Delta Plan on local
land use authority, efforts to expedite state bond funding for levee improvement projects, and the
development of flow standards that will impact water quality and ecosystem health in the Delta.
The County’s adopted Delta Water Platform, as well as the Strategic and Action Plans, are
incorporated in this Platform by reference.
Priority 4: Realignment Implementation – The battle for constitutional protections for 2011
Realignment concluded successfully on November 6, 2012 when Proposition 30 was passed by
the voters. Proposition 30 provides constitutional guarantees to the funding that supports
Realignment and safeguards against future program expansion without accompanying funding.
With these provisions in place, Contra Costa County continues to implement the array of programs
transferred under 2011 Realignment, confident that funding is secure and programmatic
responsibilities are defined. However, the County remains concerned that the funding is not
sufficient and is also concerned about liability issues arising from the new responsibilities.
Any future proposals to realign programs to counties must have constitutionally guaranteed
ongoing funding and protections. The County will oppose any proposals that would transfer
additional program responsibility to counties without funding, constitutional protections, county
participation and approval. The County will also oppose efforts that limit county flexibility in
implementing programs and services realigned in 2011 or infringe upon our ability to innovate
locally. The County resolves to remain accountable to our local constituents in delivering high-
quality programs that efficiently and effectively respond to local needs. Further, we support
counties’ development of appropriate measures of local outcomes and dissemination of best
practices.
With regard to Public Safety realignment, counties have received parolees whose latest crime fits
the specified “non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offender” (N3) definition but who have a criminal
background that includes violent, serious and/or sexual crimes. Under the current legislation, the
person’s latest offense/crime determines if they meet the N3 criteria. These individuals should
stay under the responsibility of the state.
The County will also support efforts to provide additional funding/grants to those counties that
have a commitment to lowering the crime rate and reducing recidivism through the provision of
innovative, comprehensive, evidence-based programs for offender populations and their families.
The County will also continue to support efforts to ensure that the receipt of Local Community
Corrections Funds matches the amounts anticipated from the state, without undue delay. Finally,
the County also supports more funding for mental health and behavioral health programs and
facilities in order to meet the requirements of Realignment and the goal of reducing recidivism.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 67 of 166
5
STATE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS
A brief background statement accompanies policy positions that are not self-evident. Explanatory notes
are included either as the preface to an issue area or following a specific policy position. Please note that
new and revised policy positions are highlighted. The rationale for the policy position is italicized.
Agriculture
1. SUPPORT efforts to ensure sufficient State funding for pest and disease control and
eradication efforts to protect both agriculture and the native environment, including glassy-
winged sharpshooter, light brown apple moth, and Japanese dodder activities; high risk
pest exclusion activities; pesticide regulatory and law enforcement activities; and noxious
weed pest management. Agriculture is an important industry in Contra Costa County.
Protection of this industry from pests and diseases is important for its continued viability.
2. SUPPORT continued appropriations for regulation and research on sudden oak death, a
fungal disease affecting many species of trees and shrubs in native oak woodlands. The
County’s natural environment is being threatened by this disease.
3. SUPPORT funding for agricultural land conservation programs and agricultural enterprise
programs, and support revisions to State school siting policies, to protect and enhance the
viability of local agriculture. The growth in East County and elsewhere has put significant
pressure on agricultural lands, yet agriculture is important not only for its production of
fresh fruits, vegetables and livestock, but also as a source of open space.
4. SUPPORT legislation to establish legal authority where needed to facilitate the efforts by
the California Department of Food and Agriculture and the Department of Boating and
Waterways to survey and treat all infestations of the South American spongeplant and to
rid the Delta of this and other invasive aquatic species through integrated pest management
methods. Invasive aquatic species are a threat to agriculture, the environment and
recreation in the Delta. This position includes support for efforts by the Department of
Boating and Waterways to secure multi-year permits for eradication of multiple invasive
aquatic plant species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, its tributaries, and its marshes .
5. SUPPORT the CSAC policy statement regarding revisions to the California Conservation
Act of 1965 (the Williamson Act) to support legislative changes that preserve the integrity
of the Williamson Act, eliminate abuses resulting in unjustified and premature conversions
of contracted land for development, and to fully restore Williamson Act subventions. The
state subventions to counties also must be revised to recognize all local tax losses.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 68 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 6
Animal Services
6. SUPPORT efforts to protect local revenue sources designated for use by the Animal
Services Department; i.e., animal licensing, fines and fees. Fines, fees, and licensing are
major sources of revenue for the Animal Services Department. The demand for animal
services is increasing each year as does the demand on the General Fund. It is important
to protect these revenue sources to continue to provide quality animal service and to meet
local needs.
7. SUPPORT efforts to protect or increase local control and flexibility over the scope and
level of animal services. Local control over the scope of animal services is necessary to
efficiently address public safety and other community concerns. Local control affords
jurisdictions the ability to tailor animal service programs to fit their communities. Animal
related issues in dense urban areas vary from those in small, affluent communities.
8. SUPPORT efforts to protect against unfunded mandates in animal services or mandates
that are not accompanied by specific revenue sources which completely offset the costs of
the new mandates, both when adopted and in future years. Unfunded mandates drain our
limited fiscal resources and, at the same time, chip away at local control over the scope
and level of services.
9. SUPPORT efforts to ensure full funding of State animal services mandates, including
defense of the Department of Finance’s lawsuit against the State Commission on Mandates
regarding the State obligations for reimbursement of local costs for animal services
incurred in compliance with SB 1785. The County invested large sums of money to comply
with SB 1785, with the assurance that our cost would be offset by reimbursements from the
State. Failure by the State to honor the reimbursements negatively impacts the County
General Fund and Animal Services’ budget.
10. SUPPORT efforts to protect and/or increase County flexibility to provide animal services
consistent with local needs and priorities. The demand for quality animal service
programming continues to increase each year. The County is experiencing population
growth and changing demographics. It is incumbent upon the Animal Services Department
to be flexible enough to adjust to the changing needs and priorities.
11. SUPPORT efforts to preserve the integrity of existing County policy relating to Animal
Services (e.g., the Animal Control Ordinance and land use requirements). Contra Costa is
looked upon as one of the model Animal Services Departments in the state. Its policies,
procedures, and ordinances are a yardstick against which other Animal Control
organizations are measured. The local control exercised by the Board of Supervisors is
key to that hallmark.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 69 of 166
7
Child Support Services
12. SUPPORT the establishment of a statewide electronic registry for the creation and
release/satisfaction of liens placed on property of a non-custodial parent as necessary to
collect delinquent child support payments. California law currently provides that
recording an abstract or notice of support judgment with a County Recorder creates a lien
on real property. This requires recording the judgment in each of the 58 counties in order
not to miss a property transaction. An electronic registry would simplify not only the
creation of liens but also the release/satisfaction of liens because there would be a single
statewide point of contact, and the entire process would be handled electronically through
automated means.
13. SUPPORT amendment of current law that states that documents completed and recorded
by a local child support agency may be recorded without acknowledgement (notarization)
to clarify that the exception is for documents completed or recorded by a local child support
agency. This amendment clarifies that documents that are prepared by the local child
support agency and then sent for recording either by the local child support agency or by
the obligor (non-custodial parent) or by a title insurance company are covered by the
exemption, a technical point not acknowledged by all county recorder offices.
14. SUPPORT efforts to simplify the court process for modifying child support orders by the
court by requiring court appearances only when one of the parties objects to the
modification. Currently, establishment of parentage and support by the court is permitted
without court appearance if both parties are in agreement. A similar process for
modification would reduce court time, the workload of all involved agencies and parties,
and streamline the process.
15. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that the reduction to the California Department of Child
Support Services is not passed down as a reduction to the local program.
16. SUPPORT efforts that would require the Department of Child Support Services to provide
any notice form, information, or document that is required or authorized to be given,
distributed, or provided to an individual, a customer, or a member of the public to be given,
distributed, or provided in a digitized form, and by any means the Department determines
is feasible, including, but not limited to, e-mail or by means of a website.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 70 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 8
Climate Change
17. SUPPORT the CSAC Climate Change Policy Statements and Principles which address a
broad range of issues affected by climate change, including water, air quality, agriculture,
forestry, land use, solid waste, energy and health. The document is largely based on
existing CSAC policy and adapted to climate change. Additionally, the document contains
a set of general principles which establish local government as a vital partner in the
climate change issue and maintain that counties should be an active participant in the
discussions in the development of greenhouse gas reduction strategies underway at the
state and regional level.
18. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that the implementation of AB 32 results in harmony between
the greenhouse gas reduction target created by the Air Resources Board for each
regional/local agency, the housing needs numbers provided by the state Department of
Housing and Community Development pursuant to housing element law, and the
Sustainable Communities Strategy developed through the Regional Transportation Plan
processes.
19. SUPPORT legislative or administrative efforts that favor allocation of funding from the
California Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade Program to jurisdictions that are the largest
emitters of greenhouse gas, have disadvantaged communities that are disproportionately
affected by environmental pollution, have Natural Community Conservation Plans or
similar land conservation efforts that will address climate change and have demonstrated a
local commitment to climate protection (e.g. established emissions reduction targets,
prepared Climate Action Plans, etc.). The County has several good projects that would
sequester carbon, such as Creek and wetland restoration projects.
20. SUPPORT efforts to expand eligible expenditures of the Greenhouse Gas Revenue Fund
to investments in accessible transit/transportation systems (serving seniors, disabled,
veterans) which result in more efficient (shared trips, increased coordination) service and
corresponding reductions in greenhouse gas production. This policy is in support of the
accessible transit/transportation initiatives discussed during the Measure X and 2017
Countywide Transportation Plan approval, and is consistent with the "Accessible
Transportation" report provided to the Board of Supervisors in September 2017 which
documented the need for substantial investment to make improvements in this field. The
September 2017 report established that the County is not unique in this situation; these
issues are widespread which justifies a statewide/nationwide legislative approach.
21. SUPPORT efforts to ensure life-cycle costs are considered when planning new projects in
the state. A key challenge for State and local agencies is funding the ongoing operation
and maintenance of infrastructure. This includes all aspects of the built environment:
buildings, roads, parks, and other infrastructure. As California begins to implement more
aggressive climate goals, the State should be thinking about new methodologies for
anticipating project costs. In particular, it is evident that California will need a different
transportation system than the one we have currently, and that this new transportation
system will be more expensive to maintain. Traditional accounting methods that look only
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 71 of 166
9
at initial project cost lead to situations where infrastructure fails, at greater replacement
cost than if ongoing operation and maintenance had been included from the beginning.
This would include methodologies for internalizing the social and environmental costs of
projects.
22. SUPPORT revisions to the Public Resources Code and the Air Resources Board’s
Investment Plans to provide Cap and Trade funding for the conservation of natural lands,
parks and open space through fee title acquisition as well as easements.
23. OPPOSE changes to the California Environmental Protection Agency’s protocols for
designating disadvantaged communities which result in a reduction in the number or size
of disadvantaged communities in Contra Costa County. Disadvantaged communities are
prioritized for receipt of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds, the funding source for a
number of state grant programs. Contra Costa County has a number of communities and
neighborhoods that are economically and socially disadvantaged and located near large,
current and former industrial sites. These industrial operations contribute through the Cap
and Trade program to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The state designations should
continue to reflect the disproportionally acute needs of these communities.
24. As California and the East Bay region experiences more frequent and prolonged periods of
extreme heat, extreme heat will impact human health, demand on health services, potable
water, agriculture, vectors, wild fires, and demand on electricity. SUPPORT funding and
infrastructure to help protect vulnerable communities and populations as the mean
temperature of the region steadily increases due to global climate change.
Delta Water Platform
To protect the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from various detrimental forces that are
affecting its health and resources, it is the policy of Contra Costa County to support
implementation of projects and actions that will help improve the Delta ecosystem and the
economic conditions of the Delta. Contra Costa County has adopted a Delta Water
Platform to identify and promote activities and policy positions that support the creation
of a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Contra Costa County will use this Platform to
guide its own actions and advocacy in other public venues regarding the future of the Delta.
Elections
25. SUPPORT legislation to adjust precinct sizing from 1,000 voters per precinct to 1,250
voters per precinct. With the option of being able to have up to 1,250 voters per precinct,
the best polling locations in a neighborhood can be selected, and that same site is more
likely to be used for several elections, thus avoiding the need to change poll sites for voters.
26. SUPPORT full state reimbursement for state mandates imposed upon local registrars by
the Secretary of State, including special state elections. The state has committed to
reimburse Counties for the cost of certain state mandates. That reimbursement process,
SB 90, can be lengthy and contentious. The SB 90 process is also subject to uncertainties
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 72 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 10
including partial payments, delayed payments, and now, suspended or no payments. In
lieu of the SB 90 process for Elections, there is merit in the examination of having the state
pay its pro-rata share of costs when state candidates/measures are on the ballot.
Emergency Preparedness, Emergency Response
27. SUPPORT legislation that would give local agencies more authority to train volunteers,
provide funding for Community Emergency Response Training (CERT), and help clean-
up oil spills without taking on additional legal liability.
28. SUPPORT legislation that would require the state’s Oil Spill Prevention and Response
Agency to improve communication and clean-up technology, increase safety standards for
ships and establish special protections for ecologically sensitive areas.
29. SUPPORT legislation that would require responses to future oil spills in a shorter
timeframe, with a more regional approach.
30. SUPPORT measures that enable counties and other local agencies to better exercise their
responsibilities to plan for and respond to emergencies and disasters without taking on
additional legal liability and oppose those that do not recognize or support the county and
local agency role in the State’s Standardized Emergency Management System.
31. SUPPORT legislation or other measures requiring the creation or utilization of emergency
rock stockpiles suitable for levee repair throughout the Delta, enabling increasingly
efficient and less costly prevention of levee breaks and enhancement of initial response
capabilities.
32. SUPPORT legislation that expands school safety improvement programs such as education
regarding and placement of automated external defibrillator(s) (AED(s)) in schools.
Eminent Domain
33. SUPPORT legislation that maintains the distinction in the California Constitution between
Section 19, Article I, which establishes the law for eminent domain, and Section 7, Article
XI, which establishes the law for legislative and administrative action to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare.
34. SUPPORT legislation that would provide a comprehensive and exclusive basis in the
California Constitution to compensate property owners when property is taken or damaged
by state or local governments, without affecting legislative and administrative actions taken
to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 73 of 166
11
Flood Control and Clean Water
35. SUPPORT authorization for regional approaches to comply with aquatic pesticide permit
issues under the purview of the State Water Resources Control Board. Contra Costa
County entered into an agreement with a neighboring county and several cities to share
the costs of monitoring. While it makes sense for local government to pool resources to
save money, State Board regulations make regional monitoring infeasible.
36. SUPPORT efforts to provide local agencies with more flexibility and options to fund
stormwater programs. Stormwater permit requirements issued by the Regional Water
Quality Control Boards are becoming more and more expensive, yet there is no funding.
Stormwater services, encompassing both water quality and drainage/flood control, could
be structured like a utility with the ability to set rates similar to the other two key water
services: drinking water and wastewater.
37. SUPPORT efforts to provide immunity to local public agencies for any liability for their
clean-up of contaminations on private lands. This will be more critical as the Regional
Water Quality Control Boards institute Total Maximum Daily Loads, which establish a
maximum allowable amount of a pollutant (like mercury) in the stormwater from a
watershed.
38. SUPPORT efforts to require the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to provide 200
year flood plain mapping for all areas in the legal Delta. SB 5 requires the County and
cities in the Delta to insure certain development projects must have 200 year level of
protection and to make certain related findings. DWR has revisited developing 200-year
flood plain maps, but if they do, only working in areas protected by project levees which
does not include any areas within Contra Costa County.
39. SUPPORT legislation to enable Zone 7 Water Agency to become a new public agency,
separate and apart from the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District, with territory in both Alameda and Contra Costa counties and the power to provide
specific services, insofar as the legislation is guided by adopted Principles of
Understanding.
General Revenues/Finance
As a political subdivision of the State, many of Contra Costa County’s services and programs are the result
of state statute and regulation. The State also provides a substantial portion of the County’s revenues.
However, the State has often used its authority to shift costs to counties and to generally put counties in the
difficult position of trying to meet local service needs with inadequate resources. While Proposition 1A
provided some protections for counties, vigilance is necessary to protect the fiscal integrity of the County.
40. SUPPORT the State's effort to balance its budget through actions that do not adversely
affect County revenues, services or ability to carry out its governmental responsibilities.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 74 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 12
41. OPPOSE any state-imposed redistribution, reduction or use restriction on general purpose
revenue, sales taxes or property taxes unless financially beneficial to the County. (Note that
a redistribution of sales and property tax may be beneficial to Contra Costa County in the
event that sales tax growth lags behind property tax growth.)
42. OPPOSE efforts to limit local authority over transient occupancy taxes (TOT).
43. OPPOSE any efforts to increase the County's share-of-cost, maintenance-of-effort
requirements or other financing responsibility for State mandated programs absent new
revenues sufficient to meet current and future program needs.
44. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that Contra Costa County receives its fair share of State
allocations, including mental health funding under Proposition 63 and pass-through of
federal funds for anti-terrorism and homeland security measures. The State utilizes a
variety of methods to allocate funds among counties, at times detrimental to Contra Costa
County.
45. SUPPORT efforts to receive reimbursement for local tax revenues lost pursuant to sales
and property tax exemptions approved by the Legislature and the State Board of
Equalization.
46. SUPPORT continued efforts to reform the state/local relationship in a way that makes both
fiscal and programmatic sense for local government and conforms to the adopted 2010
CSAC Realignment Principles, with an emphasis on maximum flexibility for counties to
manage the existing and realigned discretionary programs.
47. SUPPORT efforts to relieve California of the federal Child Support penalties without
shifting the cost of the penalties to the counties.
48. SUPPORT a reduction in the 2/3rd vote requirement to 55% voter approval for locally-
approved special taxes that fund health, education, economic, stormwater services, library,
transportation and/or public safety programs and services.
49. SUPPORT efforts to authorize counties to impose forfeitures for violations of ordinances,
as currently authorized for cities. This would provide the County with the opportunity to
require deposits to assure compliance with specific ordinance requirements as well as
retain the deposit if the ordinance requirements are not met. Currently, the County is
limited to imposing fines which are limited to only $100 - $200 for the first violation, which
has proven to be an ineffective deterrent in some cases.
50. SUPPORT efforts to redefine the circumstances under which commercial and industrial
property is reassessed to reduce the growing imbalance between the share of overall
property tax paid by residential property owners versus commercial/industrial owners.
51. SUPPORT efforts to reduce County costs for Workers’ Compensation, including the ability
to control excessive medical utilization and litigation. Workers’ Compensation costs are
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 75 of 166
13
significant, diverting funds that could be utilized for County services. Workers’
Compensation should provide a safety net for injured employees, for a reasonable period
of time, and not provide an incentive for employees to claim more time than medically
necessary.
52. SUPPORT state actions that maximize Federal and State revenues for county-run services
and programs.
53. SUPPORT legislative compliance with both the intent and language of Proposition 1A.
54. SUPPORT the provisions of Proposition 22 that would protect County revenues,
particularly as related to transportation revenues and excluding those provisions related to
redevelopment funds.
55. SUPPORT full State funding of all statewide special elections, including recall elections.
56. OPPOSE efforts of the State to avoid state mandate claims through the practice of repealing
the statues, then re-enacting them. In 2005, the State Legislature repealed sections of the
Brown Act that were subject to mandate claims, then re-enacted the same language
pursuant to a voter-approval initiative, and therefore, not subject to mandate claims.
57. SUPPORT strong Public Utilities Commission (PUC) oversight of state-franchised
providers of cable and telecommunications services, including rigorous review of financial
reports and protection of consumer interests. AB 2987 (Núñez), Chapter 700, statutes of
2006 transferred regulatory oversight authority from local government to the PUC.
58. SUPPORT timely, full payments to counties by the State for programs operated on their
behalf or by mandate. The State currently owes counties over $1 billion in State General
Funds for social services program costs dating back to FY 2002-03.
59. SUPPORT full State participation in funding the County’s retiree and retiree health care
unfunded liability. Counties perform most of their services on behalf of the State and
Federal governments. Funding of retiree costs should be the responsibility of the State, to
the same extent that the State is responsible for operational costs.
60. SUPPORT legislation that provides constitutional protections and guaranteed funding to
counties under Realignment.
Health Care
The County remains concerned about the implementation of any health care reform measures that could transfer
responsibility to counties, without commensurate financing structures or in a manner not compatible with the County’s
system. The County supports a concept of universal health coverage for all Californians. Toward that end, the County
urges the state to enact a system of health coverage and care delivery that builds upon the strengths of the current
systems in our state, including county-operated systems serving vulnerable populations.
Currently, California has a complex array of existing coverage and delivery systems that serve many, but not all,
Californians. Moving this array of systems into a universal coverage framework is a complex undertaking that
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 76 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 14
requires sound analysis, thoughtful and deliberative planning, and a multi-year implementation process. As California
moves forward with health care reform, the County urges the state to prevent reform efforts from exacerbating
problems with existing service and funding. The state must also consider the differences across California counties
and the impacts of reform efforts on the network of safety-net providers, including county providers. The end result of
health reform must provide a strengthened health care delivery system for all Californians, including those served by
the safety net.
61. SUPPORT state action to increase health care access and affordability. Access to care and
affordability of care are critical components of any health reform plan. Expanding
eligibility for existing programs will not provide access to care in significant areas of the
state. Important improvements to our current programs, including Medi-Cal, must be made
either prior to, or in concert with, a coverage expansion in order to ensure access.
Coverage must be affordable for all Californians to access care.
62. SUPPORT Medi-Cal reimbursement rate increases to incentivize providers to participate
in the program.
63. SUPPORT actions that address provider shortages (including physicians, particularly
specialists, and nurses). Innovative programs, such as loan forgiveness programs, should
be expanded. In an effort to recruit physicians from other states, the licensing and
reciprocity requirements should be re-examined. Steps should be taken to reduce the
amount of time it takes to obtain a Medi-Cal provider number (currently six to nine
months).
64. SUPPORT efforts that implement comprehensive systems of care, including case
management, for frequent users of emergency care and those with chronic diseases and/or
dual (or multiple) diagnoses. Approaches should include community-based providers and
could be modeled after current programs in place in safety net systems.
65. SUPPORT efforts that provide sufficient time for detailed data gathering of current safety
funding in the system and the impact of any redirection of funds on remaining county
responsibilities. The interconnectedness of county indigent health funding to public health,
correctional health, mental health, alcohol and drug services and social services must be
fully understood and accounted for in order to protect, and enhance as appropriate,
funding for these related services.
66. OPPOSE safety net funding transfers until an analysis of who would remain uninsured (e.g.
medically indigent adults, including citizens, who cannot document citizenship under
current Medicaid eligibility rules) is completed in order to adequately fund services for
these populations.
67. SUPPORT efforts to clearly define and adequately fund remaining county responsibilities.
68. SUPPORT state action to provide an analysis of current health care infrastructure (facilities
and providers), including current safety net facilities across the state, to ensure that there
are adequate providers and health care facilities (including recovery facilities), and that
they can remain viable after health reform.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 77 of 166
15
69. SUPPORT efforts to provide adequate financing for health care reforms to succeed.
70. SUPPORT measures that maximize federal reimbursement from Medicaid and S-CHIP.
71. SUPPORT state action to complete actuarial studies on the costs of transferring indigent
populations, who currently receive mostly episodic care, to a coverage model to ensure that
there is adequate funding in the model.
72. SUPPORT efforts that ensure that safety net health care facilities remain viable during the
transition period and be supported afterwards based on analyses of the changing health
market and of the remaining safety net population.
73. SUPPORT state action to implement a Medi-Cal waiver in a manner that maximizes the
drawdown of federal funds for services and facilities, provides flexibility, and ensures that
counties receive their fair share of funding.
74. SUPPORT efforts to increase revenues and to contain mandated costs in the County's
hospital and clinics system.
75. SUPPORT efforts to obtain a fair-share of any state funds in a distribution of funding for
the integration of IHSS and managed care.
76. SUPPORT efforts to increase the availability of health care (including alcohol and other
drugs recovery) to the uninsured in California, whether employed or not.
77. SUPPORT legislation that improves the quality of health care, whether through the use of
technology, innovative delivery models or combining and better accessing various streams
of revenue, including but not limited to acute and long term care integration.
78. SUPPORT legislation to protect safety net providers, both public and private. Legislation
should focus on stabilizing Medi-Cal rates and delivery modes and should advocate that
these actions are essential to the success of any effort to improve access and make health
care more affordable.
79. SUPPORT state efforts to increase the scope of benefits and reimbursement rates contained
in Minor Consent Medi-Cal to give youth with substance abuse disorders access to a
continuum of care, including residential and outpatient treatment.
80. SUPPORT efforts to give incentives to providers to establish more youth substance use
disorder residential treatment facilities within the county.
81. SUPPORT efforts to extend Drug Medi-Cal and Minor Consent Medi-Cal Coverage to
incarcerated youths, many of whom are in custody due to drug related crimes. This could
greatly decrease recidivism in the juvenile justice system.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 78 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 16
82. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support coverage of medically necessary alcohol
and substance use related disorder treatment at the same level as other medical conditions
in health care services, including county’s responsibility for Federal Financial Participation
(FFP) portion to increase Drug Medi-Cal reimbursement rates and incentivize providers to
participate in the program.
83. SUPPORT legislation that extends the restrictions and prohibitions against the smoking of,
and exposure to, tobacco products to include restrictions or prohibitions against electronic
cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in various places, including, but not limited to, places of
employment, school campuses, public buildings, day care facilities, retail food facilities,
multi-family housing, and health facilities; preventing the use of tobacco, electronic
smoking devices (e-cigarettes) and flavored tobacco by youth and young adults;
eliminating exposure to second-hand and third-hand smoke; restrictions on advertising of
electronic smoking devices; reducing and eliminating disparities related to tobacco use and
its effects among specific populations; increasing the minimum age to 21 to purchase
tobacco products; and the promotion of cessation among young people and adults. Support
legislation that extends restrictions and prohibitions against the sale of flavored tobacco
products, prohibits the sale of tobacco products in stores that operate a pharmacy and
establishes distance and density restrictions on the establishment of a new tobacco retailer
within proximity of youth sensitive venues such as schools, day cares, or parks.
84. SUPPORT and encourage state, federal and/or private funding for pharmaceutical research
for the development of new cannabis products which would meet Federal Drug
Administration (FDA) standards of known strengths and attributes (and without
unnecessary side effects) which would be dispensable through pharmacies and medical
facilities consistent with State and Federal law.
85. SUPPORT legislation and administrative actions that further align a statewide regulatory
framework for the commercial cannabis industry and that continue to authorize local
jurisdictions to adopt more restrictive measures to protect the health, safety and welfare of
their residents.
86. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support population-based chronic disease
prevention efforts. Collectively, these include efforts to move up-stream from the treatment
of illness associated with chronic disease to advance a policy, systems and organizational-
change approach to address the underlying environmental factors and conditions that
influence health and health behaviors.
87. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support developing a workforce with
gerontological expertise to manage the exponential growth in the chronically ill aging
population.
88. SUPPORT efforts that would advance a Health-In-All-Policies approach to policy work
done across the County. This implies consideration of how health is influenced by the built
environment and a connection with land use planning and development.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 79 of 166
17
89. SUPPORT ongoing study of the health impacts of global and regional climate change and
ongoing countywide mitigation and adaptation efforts.
90. SUPPORT efforts that would preserve the nature and quality and continuity of care
associated with safety net services historically provided at the local level, such as the
California Children’s Services (CCS) and Child Health and Disability Prevention (CHDP)
programs, which are being transitioned into managed care at the state level.
91. SUPPORT efforts that promote aging in place through the utilization of long-term supports
and services and caregiver support services.
92. SUPPORT increasing the level of funding for Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS)
and Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) to meet the increase in cost to provide
services and to meet the tremendous increase in the aging population.
93. SUPPORT maintaining level or enhanced funding, streamlined processes and greater
flexibility for use of State and Federal funding to respond to Public Health Emergency
Preparedness initiatives including Pandemic Influenza, emerging diseases, and continued
funding for all categories related to Public Health Preparedness, including Hospital
Preparedness Program, Homeland Security, Cities Readiness Initiative and core Public
Health Preparedness.
94. SUPPORT increased funding and policy changes for Tuberculosis (TB) prevention and
treatment, to reflect the increased risk of transmission faced across the Bay Area. The Bay
Area, including Contra Costa County, experiences more cases of active Tuberculosis than
do most states in the nation. The demographic make-up of our communities combined with
frequent international travel between the Bay and areas where TB is endemic, present an
added risk and thus the need to maintain adequate funding and program infrastructure .
95. SUPPORT increased funding for the public health infrastructure, capacity and prevention
services as outlined in the public health components of the Affordable Care Act and the
National Prevention and Public Health Fund.
96. SUPPORT recognition of Local Public Health Departments as an authorized provider for
direct billing reimbursement related to the provision of Immunization, Family Planning,
HIV, STD and TB services.
97. SUPPORT the reversal of the pre-emption language regarding local Menu-Labeling that is
included the Affordable Care Act.
98. SUPPORT enhanced funding and capacity for public health programs, specifically:
a. Prevention programs in the areas of chronic disease, specifically, obesity, diabetes,
asthma and cancer;
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 80 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 18
b. Prevention and risk reduction programs in the area of HIV, STD, teen pregnancy, injury
prevention as well as health promotion programs, such as nutrition and activity
education;
c. Oral health programs, especially those which address the needs of children and those
with oral health disparities;
d. Protecting the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF), as established in the
Affordable Care Act;
e. Increased resources dedicated to surveillance and prevention programs targeting
chronic diseases such as cardiovascular, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and asthma, as well
as injury and violence;
f. Funding and initiatives that support the surveillance, prevention and local preparation
for emerging diseases, such as Zika, novel Influenza, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C,
Chlamydia, and seasonal Influenza and public health programs which provide
screening, diagnosis, and treatment;
g. Provide for adequate State funding for children’s programs, including the California
Children’s Services (CCS) program for clients who are not Medi-Cal eligible to assure
that counties are not overmatched in their financial participation;
h. Programs which seek to monitor and address the needs of Foster youth, especially those
on psychotropic medication; and
i. Best practice programs which seeks to protect and enhance the health of pregnant
women and that address maternal, child and adolescent health needs.
99. SUPPORT efforts to strengthen needle exchange programs as part of an overall program
to combat the spread of HIV and other diseases; allowing items associated with needle
exchange programs such as, cookers, sterile water, and cotton to be distributed along with
clean needles; and the elimination of the federal ban on funding needle exchange programs.
100. SUPPORT legislative efforts to reduce or eliminate lead and toxic substances in consumer
products, particularly those used by infants and children.
101. SUPPORT legislative efforts to reduce exposure to toxic air pollutants and the reduction
of greenhouse gases.
102. SUPPORT funding, policy and programs dedicated to suicide, injury and violence
prevention. Additionally, support efforts aimed at reducing health disparities and inequities
associated with violence against women, communities of color and the LGBT community.
Programs which seek to limit the effects of injury, violence and abuse on children, seniors
and persons with disability.
103. SUPPORT funding and policy changes to support program development aimed at reducing
the misuse of prescription drugs, most especially opioids, and increase prevention and
treatment of opioid disorders to eliminate overdoses and combat the opioid epidemic.
Additionally, support funding and legislation to restrict the sale and use of powdered
alcohol and other similar products marketed to youth.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 81 of 166
19
104. SUPPORT necessary County infrastructure and adequate funding related to education,
regulatory, testing and enforcement functions associated with the State Medical Marijuana
regulatory controls.
105. SUPPORT legislation and/or similar policy efforts to tax certain beverages that contain
added sugars, by establishing a per fluid ounce health impact fee on sugar sweetened
beverages at the distributor level. In addition, support efforts which would create the Sugar
Sweetened Beverage Safety warning act, which would require a safety warning on all
sealed sugar sweetened beverages.
106. SUPPORT legislation and efforts that support healthy meals, adequate meal time, and
increased physical activity/education for school-age children.
107. SUPPORT efforts to dedicate funding that sustains and expands non-infrastructure Safe
Routes to School programs that educate students, parents, and school staff about safe
walking and bicycling to school.
108. SUPPORT efforts to address the underlying determinants of health and health equity, such
as housing and prevention of displacement, educational attainment and livable wage jobs,
and accessible transportation.
109. SUPPORT legislation that extends the restrictions and prohibitions against the smoking of,
and exposure to, marijuana products in various places, including, but not limited to, places
of employment, school campuses, public buildings, day care facilities, multi-family
housing, health facilities, alcohol and other drug treatment facilities, and homeless shelters;
further prohibit marijuana edibles to prevent youth/children access to harmful products;
restrictions on advertising of marijuana products targeting youth and near places frequented
by youth or alcohol and other drug treatment facilities.
110. SUPPORT funding, legislation, policy, and programs that would accomplish the following:
a. create an effective crisis response system of services for persons experiencing
homelessness, particularly families and transition-age youth;
b. increases permanent housing with services for persons experiencing or at-risk of
homelessness with a chronic disability; and
c. protects and expands the availability of affordable housing, particularly for the
Very Low and Extremely Low Income population.
111. OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly
and/or permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and
programming that would lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs.
Reductions in federal human services funding and programming severely limits critical
support for our community and state. Block grants often lead to decreases in funding that
forces states to limit benefits for families, cap enrollment, and establish waitlists. These
restrictions result in families who need these supports and services, not being able to
access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and distress .
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 82 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 20
112. OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that
represent significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the
health care system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee
categories to a per-capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for
state Medicaid programs. These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to
offset the loss of federal funding. Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population
of approximately 250,000 people, including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result .
113. OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to repeal DACA (Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative efforts that target individuals
due to their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Human Services
Administrative Support Services
114. OPPOSE the establishment of specific or stricter standards for the use of personal services
contracts by counties, that would make contracting with community-based organizations
more difficult for counties.
Aging and Adult Services
115. SUPPORT efforts to promote safety of Adult Protective Services workers conducting
required unannounced home visits by allowing them to request and receive from law
enforcement criminal record checks through the California Law Enforcement
Telecommunications System (CLETS). This would primarily be used for reported abusers
in the household.
116. SUPPORT efforts to develop emergency temporary shelter and/or short-term options for
Adult Protective Services population and consider options that include but are not limited
to, licensing of facilities specifically for this population and exploring Medi-Cal billing
options to support clients in hospitals and other care facilities pending a more permanent
housing placement.
117. SUPPORT simplification of IHSS service hour calculation and allocation to insure
compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and efficiently provide services to
consumers.
118. SUPPORT efforts that seek to identify and eliminate elder financial abuse and elder
exposure to crime that may be committed through conservatorships, powers of attorney,
notaries and others who have the right to control elder assets, including through solutions
that allow access for Adult Protective Services to access financial records for investigation
of financial abuse and exploitation. Financial abuse is a fast-growing form of abuse of
seniors and adults with disabilities and current law does not authorize financial institutions
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 83 of 166
21
to grant access to financial records necessary to investigate the reported abuse without the
consent of the account holder or authorized representative.
119. SUPPORT efforts to establish an “umbrella code” for the reporting of incidents of elder
abuse to the Department of Justice, thus more accurately recording the incidence of
abuse. Current reporting policies within California’s law enforcement community and
social services departments are uncoordinated in regards to the reporting of adult
abuse. Under an “umbrella code,” law enforcement agencies and social services
departments would uniformly report incidents of elder abuse and California would have
much better data for policy and budget development purposes .
120. SUPPORT funding for statewide Adult Protective Services training.
121. SUPPORT establishing a State funded and administered General Assistance Program . The
General Assistance Program is 100% County funded. Moving it to the State would relieve
pressure on the County budget and appropriately direct costs to the State.
122. SUPPORT legislative efforts that allow for coordination of services and data, across state
and county departments, that support aging and elder populations.
123. SUPPORT creation of a pilot program “Fostering Dignity in Aging,” to provide grant
funding to counties to be used specifically for housing preservation and eviction prevention
services of victims of elder and dependent adult abuse, exploitation, neglect, or self-
neglect.
124. SUPPORT creation of funding opportunities and policies which promote the development
of aging-friendly communities.
125. SUPPORT legislation and investments related to long-term care, senior housing
affordability, medical service access, transportation, isolation and other quality of life
issues to support aging with dignity.
126. SUPPORT research that describes and assesses local service needs and gaps impacting
aging residents and that proposes specific and actionable local strategies to address these
needs.
127. SUPPORTS efforts to allow counties to use alternative reassessment approaches, including
but not limited to telephonic reassessments, that would be applied to customers rated low
on the Functional Index Rating Scale.
128. SUPPORT efforts that focus on dependent adult and elder abuse prevention including, but
not limited to, providing respite for caregivers.
129. SUPPORT efforts that identify, eliminate and prevent in-home neglect of the elderly and
dependent adults; and scams and fraud (internet and otherwise) targeted at the elderly and
dependent adults.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 84 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 22
130. SUPPORT efforts that would require the California Department of Social Services to
translate all state-provided materials used by In-Home Support Services providers into the
statewide threshold languages: English, Spanish, Armenian, and Chinese.
131. SUPPORT efforts that would help to stabilize and provide short-term housing supports for
at-risk Adult Protective Services clients.
132. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would enhance confidentiality of DMV records for Adult
Protective Services social workers (a practice already in place for Child Protective Services
social workers).
Safety Net Programs
133. SUPPORT efforts to extend family stabilization mental health/substance abuse funding to
include all family members. Current law only funds services for adult Welfare to Work
participants.
134. SUPPORT solutions to address gaps in existing state statute that cause disruptions to
continuity of care for some Covered California Insurance Affordability Program (IAP)
enrollees when a new determination of IAP takes place.
135. SUPPORT the use of state funds to pay for CalFresh benefits for those Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACAs) and PRUCOL (Permanent Residents Under the Color of
Law) who would otherwise be ineligible for CalFresh.
136. SUPPORT efforts to extend eligibility to zero share of Medi-Cal cost when recipients
report new earned income. Potential increases to state and local minimum wage impacts
eligibility to free health care.
137. SUPPORT efforts to extend eligibility of CalWORKs benefit by exempting the first 6
months of earned income received from new employment or wage increases. This is
intended to create better financial stability when a family’s income increases due to
changes in local and state minimum wage law.
138. SUPPORT fully funding Medi-Cal Administrative costs.
139. SUPPORT efforts to increase County flexibility in the use of CalWORKs funds and in
program requirements in order to better support the transition of welfare dependent families
from welfare-to-work to self-sufficiency, including, but not limited to: extending
supportive services beyond the current limit; enhancing supportive services; increasing
diversion and early intervention to obviate the need for aid.
Legislative changes to support these initiatives could include the following:
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 85 of 166
23
a. Supportive Services. Extending the length of time CalWORKS recipients can
receive supportive service such as help with transportation, child care, work
uniforms, etc.
b. Welfare to Work. Extending the length of time families can receive Welfare to
Work services (job training and search and other employment related services)
including job retention services. Currently CalWORKS recipients are eligible to
receive supportive services and Welfare to Work services for up to 48 months if
they are in compliance with CalWORKS rules. After 48 months these services or
for CalWORKS cash aid. Helping people move from poverty and significant
education gaps to full time employment in jobs that pay a high enough wage to be
self-sufficient is difficult. It can take longer than 48 months and allowing for the
flexibility to extend supportive services and training past the 48 month time limit
would help.
c. Diversion: Removing the criteria that someone has to be apparently eligible to
CalWORKs in order to qualify for diversion and base the criteria on the client’s
circumstance and ability to maintain the situation on their own without the need of
continued assistance.
When applying income and resource requirements for diversion, use only
half of their income and/or resource value or increase the limits for income
and resources for diversion only.
Increasing the amount of the diversion payment. If the applicant doesn’t
“use” all of the amount, they have 12 months to come back into the office
and apply for the remaining amount of their diversion payments.
Allowing families to reapply for CalWORKs during their diversion period
without a repayment penalty or CalWORKs ineligibility.
d. Expanding job retention services;
e. Exempting the hard-to-serve from Welfare-to-Work activities and the 20%
exemption or providing flexibility in the time limit (dependent upon terms and
conditions of TANF authorization). Developing an eligibility definition to 250% of
the federal poverty level (FPL).Currently, the CalWORKs poverty level is 130% of
the FPL for each Assistance Unit (AU). An increase to 250% would ensure more
families meet income eligibility requirements.
All of these measures would make it easier for CalWORKs families to enter employment
services, become employed, and continue with the support they need in order to maintain
their jobs.
140. SUPPORT efforts to revise the definition of “homelessness” in the Welfare & Institutions
Codes to include families who have received eviction notices due to a verified financial
hardship, thus allowing early intervention assistance for CalWORKs families. Current law
prevents CalWORKs from providing homeless assistance until the CalWORKs family is
actually “on the street.” This rule change would enable the County to work with
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 86 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 24
CalWORKs families who are being threatened with homelessness to prevent the eviction
and, presumably, better maintain the family members’ employment status.
141. SUPPORT alignment of verification requirements for CalWORKS, CalFRESH and Medi-
Cal programs to simplify the customer experience and reduce the potential for error.
Consider letting all programs access the Federal Hub used through CalHEERs.
Currently these programs have different requirements for client verification, though they
are all benefit programs. Alignment of verifications would make program administration
more efficient and improve the client experience.
142. SUPPORT allowing all individuals in receipt of Unemployment Benefits (UIB) to be
automatically eligible for CalFresh. Applying for UI and CalFresh is duplicative because
requirements of both program are so similar. This would increase CalFresh uptake in an
efficient way.
143. SUPPORT efforts to increase CalFresh benefit amounts to better meet recipients’
nutritional needs, improve ease and accessibility of the CalFresh application and
recertification processes, and adjust CalFresh eligibility requirements to include currently
excluded populations with significant need.
144. SUPPORT efforts to restore cuts to the Supplemental Security Income/State
Supplementary Payment (SSI/SSP) Program, increase grant amounts that would allow
improvement of quality of life, and reinstate the annual Cost of Living Adjustment
(COLA.)
145. SUPPORT efforts to ensure funding of child care for CalWORKs and former CalWORKs
families at levels sufficient to meet demand. The State of California has not fully funded
the cost of child care for the “working poor.” Additional funding would allow more
CalWORKs and post-CalWORKs families to become and/or stay employed.
146. SUPPORT efforts to improve and expand emergency food assistance networks’ (e.g. local
food banks, food pantries) ability to procure, store, and distribute nutritious food to those
in need.
147. SUPPORT increase of daily rate available under Temporary HA from $65 per day to $85
per day for homeless CalWORKs families of four or fewer and provide an additional $15
per day for each additional family member up to a maximum of $145 daily.
148. SUPPORT efforts for a more flexible framework that allows the state to supplement
CalFresh benefits if federal assistance is insufficient or unavailable. Recent natural
disasters have underscored the need for a more permanent framework for the state to
respond.
149. SUPPORT continuous investment in the California Earned Income Tax Credit (CalEITC)
and efforts to increase access to California Earned Income Tax Credit, including increase
in tax credit.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 87 of 166
25
150. SUPPORT the expansion of benefits and services for immigrants, refugees, and asylum
seekers.
151. SUPPORT providing funding for graduation bonuses for non-pregnant/parenting
CalWORKs students who obtain a high school diploma/equivalent.
152. SUPPORT shared housing efforts to secure permanent housing assistance for CalWORKs
participants.
153. SUPPORT a federal waiver that would allow county social services agencies to process
CalFresh applications for jail inmates and suspend rather than terminate CalFresh
eligibility when a recipient is detailed in a county jail for a period of less than a year.
154. SUPPORT efforts that would allow CalWORKs Welfare to Work participants to
participate and achieve high school equivalency program without having their 24-month
clock be impacted during their time in the program.
Early Care and Education
155. SUPPORT the efforts of CHSA (California Head Start Association) in securing legislation
to support a state-wide integrated child care licensing structure. This will allow childcare
programs to apply for and have one child care license for all children 0-5 as opposed to the
current system of a two-license structure for varying ages of children in care. California
remains only one of two states in the nation to maintain the two license structure.
156. OPPOSE legislation, rules, regulations or policies that restrict or affect the amount of funds
available to, or the local autonomy of, First 5 Commissions to allocate their funds in
accordance with local needs.
157. OPPOSE any legislation that increases tobacco taxes but fails to include language to
replace any funds subsequently lost to The California Children and Families Act/Trust
Fund for local services funded by tobacco taxes, Proposition 10 in 1998 and Proposition
99 in 1988.
158. SUPPORT efforts by the Contra Costa County’s executive directors and program
administrators of all Child Care and Development Programs to restore state budget
allocations to the FY 2009-10 levels if verified that this is an increase by fiscal analysts for
the California State Preschool Program (CSPP), California Center-Based General Child
Care Program (CCTR), CalWORKs Stage 2 (C2AP), CalWORKs Stage 3 (C3AP),
Alternate Payment Program (CAPP), Child Care and Development Grant and the Child
Care Retention Program (AB 212). Budgets in these programs have stagnated or reduced.
An increase would greatly help low-income people find work and stay in jobs .
159. SUPPORT efforts to increase the number of subsidized child care slots to address the
shortage of over 20,000 slots serving children 0-12 years of age in Contra Costa County;
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 88 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 26
and SUPPORT efforts to enhance the quality of early learning programs and maintain local
Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) for early learning providers. Affordable
child care is key to low-income workers remaining employed and there is a significant
dearth of subsidized child care slots. Increasing quality of early learning is important to
developing skills in the next generation.
160. SUPPORT legislation to expand early child care and education and increase funding for
preschool and early learning.
161. SUPPORT the restoration of funding for Facility Restoration and Repair (FRR) grants by
California Department of Education. Increasing the funding amounts for facility
restoration of early childhood education would allow for improved facilities at Head Start
sites.
162. SUPPORT legislation to expand early care and education and increase funding for
preschool and early learning, through a diverse and multi-faceted delivery system.
163. SUPPORT restoration of child development programs (pre-2011 funding) under
Proposition 98 funding.
164. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify and streamline the definition of homelessness
across categorical eligibility for child care services to homeless children.
165. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify the definition of “volunteer” in SB 792, a bill
which prohibits, commencing September 1, 2016, a person from being employed or
volunteering at a day care center or a day care home if he or she has not been immunized
against influenza, pertussis, and measles. Current law does not specify an established
minimum of time spent in a child care facility to be considered a volunteer. SB 792,
therefore, would apply to parents/grandparents coming to child care centers for one-time
volunteer activities, to provide proof of vaccination.
166. SUPPORT efforts to that would establish/allow the enrollment of 2.9 year olds in the
California State Preschool Program.
167. SUPPORT alignment of family eligibility for subsidized child care with cost of living
adjustments and higher minimum wage rates.
168. SUPPORT the restoration of State Quality Child Care Funds which funds the Local Child
Care Planning Council.
169. SUPPORT the increase in flexibility of child care contracts with the California Department
of Education that would allow voluntary transfer of funds to occur outside of November
and May months.
170. SUPPORT efforts to raise wages for the early care and education workforce (such as child
care workers, preschool/infant-toddler teachers).
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 89 of 166
27
171. SUPPORT efforts that encourage access to early education home visiting programming -
supporting families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth and
development of their young children.
Child Welfare
172. SUPPORT continued and improved funding for substance abuse treatment and mental
health services including those that provide alternatives to incarceration and Laura’s Law.
173. SUPPORT increased funding for Foster Parent Recruitment and Retention.
174. SUPPORT continued and improved funding for implementation of Continuum of Care
Reform.
175. SUPPORT child-specific approval for kinship caregivers (and non-related extended family
members) to enable relatives to care for their related child/children, if in the child’s best
interest, even if the relative/NREFM is not able or willing to be approved as a foster parent
for their foster children.
176. SUPPORT legislative efforts that would amend the definition of “relative” as applied to
state funded Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payments (Kin-Gap) to be consistent with
the federally funded Kin-Gap. This will allow all Kinship guardianship cases to be treated
uniformly and allow more families to experience independence, normalcy and other
benefits of permanence as legal guardians.
177. SUPPORT counties to access CWS/CMS to determine family’s child abuse history for the
Resource Family Approval process.
178. SUPPORT efforts to expand California Earned Income Tax Credit (Cal-EITC) eligibility
to former foster youth under age 25 years.
179. SUPPORT efforts that would create state Homeless Youth Housing Program grants fund
to establish or expand programs that provide specified housing assistance and supportive
services to homeless youth.
Violence Prevention
180. SUPPORT efforts that seek to address the impact of domestic violence, sexual assault,
human trafficking, elder abuse and child abuse, and implement culturally relevant, trauma-
informed responses, connect victims to services, and prevent interpersonal violence.
181. SUPPORT increased investments in housing for victims of domestic violence and human
trafficking including the preservation of emergency and long-term housing options for
victims.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 90 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 28
182. SUPPORT efforts that prevent domestic violence and domestic violence homicide
including assessment of risk for assault or lethal force (including stalking and
strangulation) throughout the criminal justice system.
183. SUPPORT investments in continuous training and coordination of training for all law
enforcement officers, District Attorneys, Public Defenders, Judges and other court staff on
issues of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, elder abuse and trauma
informed approaches.
184. SUPPORT efforts to increase training on human trafficking (with a specific focus on labor
trafficking) for law enforcement and others involved in criminal investigations.
185. SUPPORT efforts that seek to specialize and build expertise for designated staff and
systems (such as developing a commercially sexually exploited youth court or creating
human trafficking units) to better support survivors of human trafficking.
186. SUPPORT efforts that differentiate risk and provide differential response for both victims
of domestic violence and sex crimes and offenders of domestic violence and sex crimes.
187. SUPPORT efforts to increase language access and cultural responsive services for
survivors of interpersonal violence.
188. SUPPORT efforts that foster collaboration across protective and criminal systems which
allow for facilitation of cross-reporting of interpersonal violence.
189. SUPPORT efforts to increase cross-agency and cross-system collaboration on human
trafficking and domestic violence cases including the sharing of confidential or protected
information in multidisciplinary team settings in order to increase support for survivors.
190. SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools
191. SUPPORT efforts that ensure survivors of interpersonal violence feel safe to access
services.
Indian Gaming Issues
Contra Costa County is currently home to the Lytton Band of the Pomo Indians’ Casino in San Pablo, a Class II
gaming facility. There has been a proposal for an additional casino in North Richmond. Local governments have
limited authority in determining whether or not such facilities should be sited in their jurisdiction; the terms and
conditions under which the facilities will operate; and what, if any, mitigation will be paid to offset the cost of
increased services and lost revenues. Contra Costa County has been active in working with CSAC and others to
address these issues, as well as the need for funding for participation in the federal and state review processes and
for mitigation for the existing Class II casino.
192. SUPPORT efforts to ensure that counties who have existing or proposed Class II Indian
gaming facilities receive the Special Distribution Funds.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 91 of 166
29
193. CONSIDER, on a case by case basis, whether or not to SUPPORT or OPPOSE Indian
gaming facilities in Contra Costa County, and only SUPPORT facilities that are unique in
nature and can demonstrate significant community benefits above and beyond the costs
associated with mitigating community impacts.
194. OPPOSE the expansion or approval of Class III gaming machines at the existing gaming
facility in Contra Costa County unless it can be demonstrated that there would be
significant community benefits above and beyond the costs associated with mitigating
community impacts.
195. SUPPORT State authority to tighten up the definition of a Class II machine.
196. SUPPORT State legislative and administration actions consistent with the CSAC policy
documents on development on Indian Lands and Compact negotiations for Indian gaming.
Land Use/Community Development
197. SUPPORT efforts to promote economic incentives for "smart growth," in Priority
Development and Priority Production Areas including in-fill and transit-oriented
development. Balancing the need for housing and economic growth with the urban limit
line requirements of Measure J (2004) will rely on maximum utilization of “smart growth”
and Sustainable Community Strategy principles. Priority Production Areas are locally
designated zones where manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and repair services
would be a priority consideration in determining future land use.
198. SUPPORT efforts to increase the supply of affordable housing, including, but not limited
to, state issuance of private activity bonds, affordable and low income housing bond
measures, low-income housing tax credits and state infrastructure financing. This position
supports a number of goals in the County General Plan Housing Element.
199. SUPPORT establishment of a CEQA exemption for affordable housing financing. Current
law provides a statutory exemption from CEQA to state agencies for financing of
affordable housing (Section 21080.10(b) of the California Public Resources Code and
Section 15267 of the CEQA Guidelines)—but not to local agencies. The current exemption
for state agencies is only operational if a CEQA review process has been completed by
another agency (e.g., by the land use permitting agency). Since the act of financing does
not change the environmental setting, the net effect of the exemption is streamlining the
process for providing financial assistance for already approved projects. AB 2518
(Houston) in 2006 was a Contra Costa County-sponsored bill to accomplish this, but it
was not successful in the Legislature.
200. SUPPORT efforts to obtain a CEQA exemption or to utilize CEQA streamlining provisions
for infill development or Priority Development Areas, including in unincorporated areas.
Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines is a Categorical Exemption for infill development
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 92 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 30
projects but only within cities or unincorporated areas of a certain size surrounded by cities.
Without the exemption, housing projects in the unincorporated areas that are not
surrounded by cities (e.g. North Richmond, Montalvin Manor and Rodeo) are subject to a
more time-consuming and costly process in order to comply with the CEQA guidelines than
that which is required of cities, despite having similar housing obligations. The CEQA
exemption bill signed by the Governor in 2013 (SB 741) only applies to mixed-use or non-
residential projects in the unincorporated areas that are both within ½ mile of a BART
station and within the boundaries of an adopted Specific Plan.
201. SUPPORT efforts to reform State housing element law to promote the actual production
and preservation of affordable housing and to focus less on process and paper compliance.
202. OPPOSE efforts to limit the County’s ability to exercise local land use authority.
203. SUPPORT efforts to reduce the fiscalization of land use decision-making by local
government, which favors retail uses over other job-creating uses and housing. Reducing
incentives for inappropriate land use decisions, particularly those that negatively affect
neighboring jurisdictions, could result in more rational and harmonious land use.
204. SUPPORT allocations, appropriations, and policies that support and leverage the benefits
of approved Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs), such as the East Contra
Costa County NCCP. Support the granting of approximately $24 million to the East Contra
Costa County NCCP from the $90 million allocation for NCCPs in Proposition 84. Support
the inclusion of NCCPs for funding in allocations from Proposition 1. Support $90 million
for implementation of NCCPs and an additional $100 million for watershed protection and
habitat conservation in future park, water or natural resource bonds. Support the position
that NCCPs are an effective strategy for addressing the impacts of climate change and
encourage appropriate recognition of the NCCP tool in implementation of climate change
legislation such as SB 375, AB 32 as well as an appropriate tool for spending Cap and
Trade revenues. Promote effective implementation of NCCPs as a top priority for the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Support an increase to $1.6 million for the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Local Assistance Grant program. Support
efforts to streamline implementation of NCCPs including exemptions from unnecessary
regulatory oversight such as the Delta Plan Covered Actions process administered by the
Delta Stewardship Council. Support alignment of State and Regional of Water Board
permits (Section 401 clean water act and storm water permits) and California Department
of Fish and Wildlife Streambed Alteration Agreement (Section 1602 of the Fish and Game
code) and other State natural resource permitting with California Endangered Species Act
permitting through NCCPs to improve the overall efficiency, predictability and
effectiveness of natural resource regulation.
205. SUPPORT legislation that would give local agencies specific tools for economic
development purposes in order to enhance job opportunities, with emphasis on attracting
and retaining businesses, blight removal and promoting smart growth and affordable
housing development, while balancing the impacts on revenues for health and safety
programs and healthy communities.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 93 of 166
31
206. SUPPORT legislation that would resolve the administrative funding gap for agencies
serving as the Successor Housing Agency. Such legislation should not have a negative
impact on the localities’ general fund. The Redevelopment Dissolution Act allows
Successor Agencies a modest allowance of tax increment funds to support Successor
Agency administrative costs. There is no such carve out for Housing Successors. However,
unlike Successor Agencies, Housing Successors have an ongoing obligation to monitor
existing affordable housing developments. These obligations will continue for up to 55
years.
207. SUPPORT legislation that would clarify the ability of successor agencies to former
redevelopment agencies to enter into contracts with its sponsoring jurisdiction and third
parties to fulfill enforceable obligations. The existing redevelopment dissolution statute
limits the contracting powers of successor agencies which is causing delays in their ability
to expeditiously retire certain enforceable obligations of the former redevelopment
agencies.
208. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that streamline compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by integrating it with other environmental protection
laws and regulations, modifying the tiering of environmental reviews, expanding the
application of prior environmental reviews, focusing areas of potential CEQA litigation,
and enhancing public disclosure and accountability.
209. OPPOSE CEQA reform efforts that reduce environmental protections for projects that
cross county or city boundaries.
210. SUPPORT efforts to improve or streamline CEQA for efficiency without losing sight of
its ultimate goal to thoroughly identify environmental impacts and mitigations.
211. OPPOSE efforts to change CEQA solely to accommodate one particular infrastructure
project or set of projects.
212. SUPPORT legislation that amends Section 20133 of the Public Contract Code to 1) delete
the existing sunset date of July 1, 2014 for design-build authority granted to counties, and
2) eliminate the current project cost threshold of $2.5 million required for the use of the
design-build method.
213. SUPPORT legislation that funds programs to remediate brownfield sites in the County and
modifies existing programs to make implementation easier or apply more broadly.
Specifically:
Consider modification to the Cleanup Loans and Environmental Assistance to
Neighborhoods (CLEAN) program that would simply the approval process for
applications;
Broaden the criteria for sites that are eligible for California Land Reuse and
Revitalization Act (CLRRA) to include all sites that are listed by the State or
Federal Government as contaminated; and
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 94 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 32
Fully fund the California Recycle Underutilized Sites (CALReUse) program.
Law and Justice System
214. SUPPORT legislation that seeks to curb metal theft by making it easier for law enforcement
agencies to track stolen metals sold to scrap dealers through such means as requiring
identification from customers selling commonly stolen metals, banning cash transactions
over a certain amount, and requiring scrap dealers to hold materials they buy for a certain
period of time before melting them down or reselling them.
215. SUPPORT legislation that provides a practical and efficient solution to addressing the
problem of abandoned and trespassing vessels and ground tackle in an administrative
process that allows the California State Lands Commission to both remove and dispose of
such vessels and unpermitted ground tackle. Boat owners in increasing numbers are
abandoning both recreational and commercial vessels in areas within the Commission’s
jurisdiction. Our state waterways are becoming clogged with hulks that break up, leak,
sink and add pollutants to our waterways and marine habitat.
216. SUPPORT legislation that requires boater’s insurance. Currently, boaters are not required
to carry insurance in California.
217. SUPPORT legislation that provides better funding for local agencies forced to deal with
abandoned and sunken vessels and their environmental impacts.
218. OPPOSE legislative proposals to realign additional program responsibility to counties
without adequate funding and protections.
219. OPPOSE legislation that would shift the responsibility of parolees from the state to the
counties without adequate notification, documentation and funding.
220. SUPPORT legislation that will help counties implement the 2011 Public Safety
Realignment as long as the proposal would: provide for county flexibility, eliminate
redundant or unnecessary reporting, and would not transfer more responsibility without
funding.
221. SUPPORT legislation that will combat the negative impact that human trafficking has on
victims in our communities, including the impact that this activity has on a range of County
services and supports, and support efforts to provide additional tools, resources and funding
to help counties address this growing problem.
222. ADVOCATE for State legislation banning the sale of alcopop products by businesses that
sell alcoholic beverages. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control is
responsible for regulating the type of alcohol products that a business may sell. A type of
flavored malt alcoholic beverage product known as “alcopops” has been identified as a
contributor to under-age drinking in the County. The term alcopops usually refers to
sweetened malt or alcoholic beverages that are typically sold in single-serving bottles or
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 95 of 166
33
cans. The Board, through recommendations from the Public Protection Committee, has
adopted amendments to the Alcoholic Beverage Sales Commercial Activities Zoning
Ordinance that authorizes the County to prohibit the sale of alcopops at any establishment
not in compliance with the performance standards. Along with the code changes, various
implementation strategies were also approved in order to better coordinate efforts between
County Departments and agencies for streamlined implementation and enforcement of the
Ordinance.
223. SUPPORT legislative reform of current bail provisions that will replace reliance on money
bail with a system that incorporates a pretrial risk assessment tool and evidence-based
pretrial release decisions. The current reliance on fixed bail schedules and commercial
money bonds ignores public safety factors and unfairly penalizes poor people who are
awaiting trial. Bail reform in this manner will ensure that only dangerous persons who
cannot be safely supervised in the community while they are awaiting trial will be held in
custody pretrial. Locally, our County has moved in this direction with an AB109 funded
pretrial program.
Levees
224. ADVOCATE for administrative and legislative action to provide significant funding for
rehabilitation of levees in the western and central Delta. Proposition 1E, passed in
November 2006, provides for over $3 billion for levees, primarily those in the Central
Valley Flood Control Program. Language is included in the bond for other Delta levees
but funding is not specifically directed. The County will work to actively advocate for $1
billion in funding through this bond.
225. SUPPORT legislation that requires the levee repair funds generated by Proposition 1E be
spent within one year or legislative hearings conducted on expediting the expenditure of
bond proceeds through the Department of Water Resources Delta Levees Section. Many
public agencies, including reclamation districts charged with maintaining levees, have
complained about the state’s inaction in allocating and distributing the levee funds that
were raised by the bond sales authorized by Proposition 1E in 2008. Legislation could
require the immediate distribution of these funds to local levee projects. The Delta Reform
Act of 2009 authorized over $202 million for levee repairs. Legislative hearings may
produce explanations from the state as to why these funds are not being distributed or
identify methods to streamline administration of these funds .
226. SUPPORT legislation to amend California Water Code Section 12986, to maintain the
state/local funding ratio of 75/25 for the state’s Delta Levees Subventions Program, which
provides funds for local levee repair and maintenance projects. The code provisions that
have the state paying 75% of project costs will expire on July 1, 2013. At that time the
matching ratio will change to 50/50. This means local reclamation districts will have to pay
a larger portion of project costs (50%, compared to their current 25% requirement). Many
districts do not have the funding to do so. The Delta Levees Subventions Program should
continue to use funds from bonds or other dedicated sources, rather than the state’s General
Fund. For the past several years the program has been funded from bonds. When these
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 96 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 34
bond funds run out, the program will have to be funded from the General Fund, unless
some other new dedicated funding source is established.
227. ADVOCATE for legislation dealing with the Delta, including levees and levee programs,
level and type of flood protection, beneficiary-pays programs, flood insurance, liability and
other levee/land use issues.
228. SUPPORT legislation/regulation requiring Reclamation Districts to develop, publish, and
maintain hazard emergency plans for their districts. Emergency response plans are critical
to emergency management, particularly in an area or situation like the Delta where a levee
break could trigger other emergencies. This legislation/regulation should also include the
requirement for plan review and annual distribution of the plan to the residents of the
district, County Office of Emergency Services and other government agencies that have
emergency response interests within the district.
229. SUPPORT legislation to amend California Water Code Section 85057.5 to bring the Delta
Stewardship Council’s “covered actions” land-use review process into consistency with
CEQA. This section of state code defines a “covered action,” which refers to local permit
decisions that are subject to potential revocation by the Council, as adopted in the Council’s
Delta Plan. The proposed process works as follows: (1) if a local permit application meets
the definition of a “covered action,” the jurisdiction must evaluate it for consistency with
all of the policies in the Council’s Delta Plan. (2) If the jurisdiction finds the project is
consistent with the Delta Plan, they notify the Council of this finding. (3) Anyone who
objects to the project may appeal the consistency finding, and it will be up to the Council
to make the final decision. Should the Council decide against the local jurisdiction, there
is no appeal process available to the jurisdiction or project applicant other than legal action .
“Covered actions” are defined in Section 85057.5 of the California Water Code. It defines
them as plans, projects or programs as defined by CEQA, and then goes on to grant several
exemptions to certain types of projects. It does not, however, provide exemptions for all
the project types that CEQA itself exempts. CEQA provides a lengthy list of categorical
exemptions for plans, projects and programs that generally do not have significant
environmental impacts, and projects that have compelling reasons to move forward quickly
(such as public safety projects). The entire list of categorical exemptions from CEQA also
should be exempt from the Delta Stewardship Council’s “covered actions” process.
Library
230. SUPPORT State financial assistance in the operation of public libraries, including full
funding of the Public Library Fund (PLF) and the Direct/Interlibrary Loan (Transaction
Based Reimbursement) program.
231. SUPPORT State bonds for public library construction. The 2000 library construction bond
provided funding for two libraries in Contra Costa County. There is currently a need of
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 97 of 166
35
approximately $289,000,000 for public library construction, expansion and renovation in
Contra Costa County.
232. SUPPORT continued funding for the California Library Literacy and English Acquisition
Services Program, which provides matching funds for public library adult literacy
programs that offer free, confidential, one-on-one basic literacy instruction to English-
speaking adults who want to improve their reading, writing, and spelling skills.
Pipeline Safety
233. SUPPORT legislation that contains specific mitigations or solutions for installation of
Automatic Shutoff Valves for both High Consequence Areas (HCA) and for those that
transverse Active Seismic Earthquake Faults for all intrastate petroleum pipelines. State
Fire Marshal Annual Inspections of all Intrastate Petroleum Pipelines do not contain the
specific mitigations or solutions for installation of Automatic Shutoff Valves for both High
Consequence Areas (HCA) and for those that traverse Active Seismic Earthquake Faults
that are mandated for Gas Pipelines under AB 2856. The County has several petroleum
pipelines that should be classified under these categories and present the same explosive
nature as gas pipelines do.
234. SUPPORT legislation that contains specific language for protection of all seasonal and all
year creeks and all State Waterways where petroleum pipelines are present. New and
replacement pipelines near environmentally and ecologically sensitive areas should use
the best available technology including, but not limited to, the installation of leak detection
technology, automatic shutoff systems or remote controlled sectionalized block valves, or
any combination of these technologies to reduce the amount of oil released in an oil spill
to protect state waters and wildlife.
Telecommunications and Broadband
235. SUPPORT clean-up legislation on AB 2987 that provides for local emergency notifications
similar to provisions in cable franchises for the last 20 years. Currently our franchises
require the cable systems to carry emergency messages in the event of local emergencies.
With the occurrence of several local refinery incidents, this service is critical for Contra
Costa. Under federal law, Emergency Alert System requirements leave broad discretion to
broadcasters to decide when and what information to broadcast, emergency management
offices to communicate with the public in times of emergencies.
236. SUPPORT preservation of local government ownership and control of the local public
rights-of-way. Currently, local government has authority over the time, place, and manner
in which infrastructure is placed in their rights-of-way. The California Public Utilities
Commission is considering rulemaking that would give them jurisdiction to decide issues
between local government and telecommunication providers.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 98 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 36
237. SUPPORT the expansion of broadband (high speed internet service) to drive economic
development and job opportunities, support county service delivery, and improve health,
education and public safety outcomes for residents. For communities to realize these full
benefits of broadband it must be capable of supporting current technology.
Access and adoption are both necessary elements that should be supported in state and
federal legislative or regulatory proposals. This entails the following:
• Establishing and maintaining reliable broadband in unserved or underserved
communities;
• Promoting the knowledge, skills and behaviors that comprise digital literacy;
• Making broadband affordable for all households;
• Maximizing funding for infrastructure; and
• Reducing infrastructure deployment barriers.
Transportation
238. SUPPORT increased flexibility in the use of transportation funds.
239. SUPPORT regional coordination that provides for local input in addressing transportation
needs. Coordinated planning and delivery of public transit, paratransit, non-
profit/community-based transit, and rail services will help ensure the best possible service
delivery to the public. Regional coordination will be essential to complete planning and
development of important regional transportation projects that benefit the state and local
road system such as TriLink (State Route 239), improvements to Vasco Road, completion
of remaining segments of the Bay Trail, improvements to the Delta DeAnza Regional Trail,
and the proposed California Delta and Marsh Creek Trails. There may be interest in
seeking enhanced local input requirements for developing the Sustainable Communities
Strategy for the Bay Area mandated by SB 375 for greenhouse gas reduction. It is
important that the regional coordination efforts are based on input gathered from the local
level, to ensure the regional approach does not negatively impact local communities.
“Top-down” regional or state planning efforts would be inconsistent with this goal.
Consistent with that position, relief from the requirements imposed on the County by the
state relative to the Iron Horse corridor would foster coordination along this multi-
jurisdictional corridor.
240. SUPPORT efforts to improve safety throughout the transportation system. The County
supports new and expanded projects and programs to improve safety for bicyclists,
pedestrians and wheelchair users, as well as projects to improve safety on high-accident
transportation facilities such as Vasco Road. Data on transportation safety would be
improved by including global positioning system (GPS) location data for every reported
accident to assist in safety analysis and planning. The County also supports the expansion
of school safety improvement programs such as stable/dedicated funding for crossing
guards, revised school zone references in the vehicle code, Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S)
grants, statutory authorization of an automated safety enforcement (speed cameras) pilot
program, efforts to improve the safety, expansion and security of freight transportation
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 99 of 166
37
system including public and private maritime ports, airports, rail yards, railroad lines, rail
bridges and sidings. The County also supports limits or elimination of public liability for
installing traffic-calming devices on residential neighborhood streets.
241. SUPPORT funding or incentives for the use of environmentally-friendly resources in
transportation construction projects. The County seeks and supports grant programs, tax
credits for manufacturers, state purchasing programs, and other incentives for local
jurisdictions to use renewable and environmentally friendly materials such as pervious
concrete, cool pavements, rubberized asphalt (made from recycled tires) that the County
has used as paving material on San Pablo Dam Road and Pacheco Boulevard, and other
emerging technologies/materials.
242. SUPPORT streamlining the delivery of transportation safety projects. The length of time
and amount of paperwork should be reduced to bring a transportation safety project more
quickly through the planning, engineering and design, environmental review, funding
application, and construction phases, such as for Vasco Road. This could include
streamlining the environmental review process and also streamlining all state permitting
requirements that pertain to transportation projects. Realistic deadlines for use of federal
transportation funds would help local jurisdictions deliver complex projects without
running afoul of federal time limits which are unrealistically tight for complex projects.
243. SUPPORT efforts to coordinate development of state-funded or regulated facilities such as
courts, schools, jails, roads and state offices with local planning. The County supports
preserving the authority of Public Works over County roads by way of ensuring the Board
of Supervisors’ control over County roads as established in the Streets & Highways Code
(Ch2 §940) is not undermined. This includes strongly opposing any action by a non-local
entity that would ultimately dilute current Board of Supervisors discretion relative to road
design and land use. In addition to being coordinated with local planning, there are well
documented conflicts between state school development policies and state policies related
to greenhouse gas reduction, safe routes to school, complete streets, and “Health In All
Policies.” The County supports administrative and legislative efforts to resolve these
conflicts.
244. SUPPORT efforts to coordinate planning between school districts, the state, and local
jurisdictions for the purposes of: (1) locating and planning new schools, (2) funding
programs that foster collaboration and joint use of facilities, and (3) financing off-site
transportation improvements for improved access to existing schools. The County will urge
the California Department of Education’s current Title 5 update effort to include removing
the current conflict between current school siting policies and sustainable communities.
Related to this effort, the County supports reform of school siting practices by way of
legislative changes related to any new statewide school construction bond authorization.
The County takes the position that reform components should include bringing school
siting practices and school zone references in the vehicle code into alignment with local
growth management policies, safe routes to school best practices, State SB 375 principles,
and the State Strategic Growth Council’s “Health in All Policies Initiative.”
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 100 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 38
245. SUPPORT regional aviation transportation planning efforts for coordinated aviation
network planning to improve service delivery. Regional aviation coordination could also
improve the surrounding surface transportation system by providing expanded local
options for people and goods movement.
246. SUPPORT efforts to increase waterborne transport of goods and obtaining funds to support
this effort. The San Francisco to Stockton Ship Channel is a major transportation route
for the region, providing water access to a large number of industries and the Ports of
Sacramento and Stockton. A project is underway to deepen the channel, providing
additional capacity to accommodate increasing commerce needs of the Ports and
providing better operational flexibility for the other industries. Increased goods movement
via waterways has clear benefits to congestion management on highways and railroads
(with resultant air quality benefits).
247. SUPPORT legislative and administrative measures to enhance rail safety, increase state
oversight of railroad bridges, provide funding for the training of first responders, and
implement regulations that increase tank car safety standards for cars transporting crude
oil and other hazardous materials, and regulations that require railroads to share data with
state emergency managers and local responders.
248. SUPPORT funding increases for active transportation projects and planning. Funding is
needed for improved pedestrian infrastructure and enhancements and expansion of: trails,
on-street bike facilities (Class II and III), and separated facilities (Class I and Class IV
[cycle track]). Funding is also needed for corridor and ”bicycle superhighway” planning,
trail access improvements, overcrossings, intersection improvements, Class I - IV inter-
connectivity projects (gap closures), wayfinding/signage projects, and facilities/designs
identified in emerging best practices.
249. OPPOSE efforts to condition or link the distribution of transportation funds to a
jurisdiction’s production of housing relative to RHNA (Regional Housing Needs
Allocation).
250. SUPPORT administrative or legislative mechanisms that facilitate coordination between
transportation agencies and utilities relative to expediting construction projects. Without
willing and proactive coordination, transportation projects are subject to delays and
substantially increased costs. These costs are borne by the taxpayers.
Veterans
251. SUPPORT legislation and budget actions that will continue the state's annual local
assistance for County Veterans Service Offices at a minimum of the $5.6 million
level. The eventual goal is to fully fund CVSOs by appropriating the full $11 million in
local assistance funding as reflected in Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1(d).
County Veterans Service Offices (CVSOs) play a vital role in the local veteran community,
not only within the Veterans Affairs claims process, but in other aspects as well. This
includes providing information about all veterans’ benefits (Federal, State and local), as
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 101 of 166
39
well as providing claims assistance for all veteran-related benefits, referring veterans to
ancillary community resources, providing hands-on development and case management
services for claims and appeals and transporting local veterans to VA facilities.
252. SUPPORT legislation and budget actions that will provide veterans organizations with
resources to make necessary repairs to, or replacement of, their meeting halls and facilities.
Across California, the meeting halls and posts of Veterans Service Organizations such as
the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars serve as unofficial community centers.
Many of these facilities are not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act
accessibility standards, are not earthquake retrofitted, or have deteriorated in recent years
due to declining membership and reduced rental revenues as a result of the economic
downturn. The County will support legislation that would create a competitive grant
program for veterans’ organizations, classified by the IRS as 501c19 non-profit
organizations and comprised primarily of past or present members of the United States
Armed Forces and their family members, to use for repairs and improvements to their
existing facilities.
253. SUPPORT legislation that will improve the timeliness and quality of both VA benefits
claim decisions and VA healthcare services. Specifically, legislation that works toward
improving on the expedited processing of claims, providing VA healthcare, and
administering of benefits to populations with unique needs, such as homeless Veterans,
Women Veterans, and Veterans experiencing service related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
or service related Traumatic Brain Injury.
Waste Management
254. SUPPORT legislation that establishes producer responsibility for management at the end
of their useful life of products, including pharmaceuticals, batteries, sharps and veterinary
medicine.
255. SUPPORT efforts to increase the development of markets for recycled materials.
256. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts to allow third parties, under specific
circumstances and conditions, to collect and transport household hazardous waste to
collection facilities.
257. SUPPORT legislation that seeks to remedy the environmental degradation and solid waste
management problems on a State-wide basis of polystyrene containers and single-use
plastic bags typically given away for free at grocery, retail and other establishments.
258. SUPPORT legislation that does not require increased diversion from landfills without an
adequate funding mechanism.
259. SUPPORT legislation that would make changes to the used tire redemption program.
Instead of collecting a disposal fee from the consumer when new tires are purchased, a
disposal fee would be collected at the wholesale level and redeemed by the disposal site
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 102 of 166
Draft 2018 Platform 40
when the used tires are brought to the site. The party bringing the tires to the disposal site
would also receive a portion of the fee.
260. SUPPORT legislation that relieves counties with privately-operated landfills from the state
requirement for maintaining a 15-year supply of disposal capacity for waste generated
within each county. In 1989, Contra Costa County amended its general plan to
accommodate construction of Keller Canyon Landfill. Due to the difficulty in siting
landfills and the requirements of Public Resources Code 47100 – Countywide Siting
Element, the County maintained authority to control the amount of waste disposed at this
facility from outside the county. Despite Contra Costa County’s opposition, AB 845
became law on January 1, 2013 and prohibits any jurisdiction from regulating the amount
of waste disposed at a privately-operated landfill based on its place of origin.
Because local jurisdictions can no longer control importation of waste to privately-
operated landfills, a host County that receives a significant amount of waste from outside
the county will have a greater need to undertake the difficult task of identifying new
disposal capacity pursuant to the Countywide Siting Element requirement. Since the state
believes there is no need for local jurisdictions to regulate disposal of solid waste by place
of origin, the state should remove existing statutes that require each County with privately-
operated landfills to identify sufficient disposal capacity for the waste generated by the
jurisdictions within that County.
261. SUPPORT legislation that can reduce the amount of harmful pharmaceuticals (including
veterinary medicine) that ultimately enter waste water treatment facilities, bodies of water,
and landfills.
262. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts to restrict payments from the Beverage
Container Recycling Program Fund for redemption of beverage containers sold out of state.
Fraudulent redemption of these beverage containers is costing the Fund from $40 million
to $200 million annually. This fraud combined with loans to the General Fund to reduce
the State budget deficit has significantly reduced the availability of funds for increasing
recycling as intended under the law.
263. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that correct the imbalance between the
County’s regulatory authority to control the collection and disposal of solid waste
generated within the unincorporated areas and our exposure to state penalties for failing to
meet state mandates for diverting solid waste generated within these areas as a result of
Appellate Court decisions. In litigation where the County sought to protect its solid waste
franchise authority for unincorporated areas the court awarded franchise authority to the
Rodeo Sanitary District and Mountain View Sanitary District while the County remains
exposed to state penalties for failing to meet state mandates for reducing disposal of solid
waste generated in these areas.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 103 of 166
41
Workforce Development
264. SUPPORT legislative and regulatory efforts that make the necessary changes to existing
law for the implementation of the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) in California. The County supports legislation that would include provisions that
state that the Local Plan developed by local workforce boards should be the basis of all
workforce planning in the local areas and all workforce-related state grants. Additionally,
the County supports provisions that ensure that staffing costs and support services should
be included in the training expenditure requirement. Finally, the County supports
provisions that require all programs listed in the Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act
(WIOA) work together to ensure that data is collected and reported across all programs,
utilizing the state’s base-wage file system to ease local reporting burdens .
265. SUPPORT efforts to include marginally attached workers, including discouraged workers,
and involuntary part-time workers more formally in the California Workforce Investment
Act.
Attachment B--clean copy
Page 104 of 166
Amended Legislation – State Priorities
1. Support Homeless Youth Advocacy and Housing Program- California females are
more likely than males to live on incomes below the federal poverty level: 16% of women
and girls compared to 14% of men and boys live below the poverty level. Women and girls
are also more likely to live in extreme poverty on incomes less than 50% of the FPL. CCCW
support establishing the Homeless Youth Advocacy and Housing Program to provide
housing assistance and supportive services to homeless young and teenage girls with the
goal of transitioning youth towards self-sufficiency. AB 1406 2017 legislative priority
141.
2. Expand Access to Childcare- Support keeping promises in the state budget to increase
access for 1,479,000 children in California who are eligible for subsidized childcare. When
mothers cannot find or afford childcare, the economy suffers, and workforce opportunities
are missed. Support legislation that allows parents earning the minimum wage to keep their
affordable child care. Outdated income guidelines harm working parent’s due to the
increase in minimum wage and mothers and fathers are no longer eligible for affordable
childcare if they work full-time. The extra 50 cents an hour has unintentionally caused
families to lose childcare. 2017 legislative priority 132.
3. Support improving access to comprehensive and affordable health care for
women. We strongly encourage better access to health benefits, wellness and preventative
healthcare, literacy, and better doctor-patient relationships. Among California women who
delayed medical care, just over half (51%) cited cost or lack of insurance as the reason: 59%
of Latinas, 50% of White women, 37% of Asian-American women and 35% of African-
American women delayed care due to cost or lack of insurance. 2017 Priority 2
healthcare.
4. Mental Health -Support the court's postponement of prosecution of a misdemeanor or
a felony punishable in a county jail and place a defendant in a pretrial diversion program if
the court is satisfied the defendant has a mental disorder and meets certain other
requirements. Women in Contra Costa County suffer from mental health issues at an
alarming rate. This would allow the defense to arrange for a program of mental health
treatment utilizing inpatient or outpatient mental health resources. CA SB 8 - 2017
Priority 4: Realignment Implementation.
5. Domestic Violence -Support Governor Brown’s recommendation to maintain full
funding of domestic violence program at $20.6 million. Keep equal access funds and legal
services for domestic violence survivors by supporting a $30 million increase to the Equal
Access Fund to broaden the availability of legal advocacy to low-income Californians and
survivors. Improve safety for immigrant survivors supporting the California Values Act,
which separates federal immigration enforcement from local law enforcement efforts
decreasing fear of deportation among immigrant survivors when reporting harm, they have
experienced. 2017- item 150.
Attachment C
Page 105 of 166
Amended Legislation – Federal Priorities
1. Human Trafficking –Human Trafficking is the illegal recruitment, transportation,
harboring, provision or obtaining of people (by force, fraud or coercion), typically for forced
labor or commercial sexual exploitation. Nearly 20.9 million people around the world fall
victim to this multi-billion-dollar industry. In the last two years, Contra Costa partners on a
Federal human trafficking grant have served over 240 victims of human trafficking. Women
and girls are the predominant groups of people that are harmed by these actions. The
County will advocate for the following federal actions to ensure support and services for
victims of human trafficking, and the systems that help them: • SUPPORT federal funding
that effectively enables service providers to assist victims and law enforcement to
prosecute traffickers. Because it takes a well-resourced multifaceted approach to support
victims and to ensure traffickers are prosecuted support cross-system, comprehensive
approaches to preventing human trafficking. SUPPORT efforts that increase the level of
training, awareness, and funding to address promising practices related to labor trafficking
(including the hospitality industry, restaurants, etc.). Victims of trafficking may be found
everywhere– some may be found working against their will in hotels/motels for long hours
for little or no pay. Labor Adopted 2017 Federal Platform January 19, 2017, trafficking has
been found in diverse labor settings including domestic work, restaurants, nail salons, small
businesses, large farms, and factories.
2. Sexual Assault -Support providing funding to services for victims of sexual violence,
and encourage systemic change to aid survivors and those who serve them. In the wake of
the federal government rescinding Title IX sexual assault guidelines that provide the
framework for school investigations on campus sexual misconduct we must look to provide
alternative resources to ensure the safety of women and girls in the community.
3. Workforce Development – Contra Costa County supports policies that meet the needs
of serving businesses, workers, job seekers, and youth. The County further supports policies
under the Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) that preserve local decision-
making relative to spending, the direction of work, and other functions of local workforce
boards. The County also supports policies that promote equal employment
opportunities for women and men in an effort to increase employment and the
creation of jobs in both the public and private sector and that enhance business’ access to a
qualified talent pool, and promote business growth through the development of a skilled
workforce. The County also favors policies that provide increased funding to support job
seeker services, as well as policies that make strategic investments to leverage existing
funding in the workforce development arena.
Attachment C
Page 106 of 166
Department: Contra Costa County
Commission for Women
& Girls
Email: laurenababb@gmail.com
Contact Person: Lauren Babb/ Beth Mora Telephone: (313) 452-1107
Title: Member Support legislation that would guarantee pay equity for women.
Check one: State Platform [ X ] Federal Platform [ ]
Dept. Priority: __1__ of _5___ (e.g. 1 of 3)
I. Summary of Proposal:
Please briefly describe the proposal and include the following information (where applicable):
1. Fair Pay and Job Opportunity - Support legislation that would guarantee pay equity for
women. Women continue to be paid less than men across virtually all occupational categories
reported in California. The gender wage gap for full-time, year-round workers in California is 86
cents on the dollar, resulting in California women earning on average approximately $7,000 a
year less than men. Supporting legislation that mandates equal pay reports from contractors in
the county that allows Contra Costa Health and Human Services to review compensation by sex,
race, and ethnicity to investigate pay discrimination. This will enable stronger protections for
women in the workplace. Equal pay reports from contractors with the county.
II. Action Requested:
Support and include in the 2018 State Legislative priorities.
III. Fiscal Impact:
a. County : We are not seeking legislation at this time. Women in the county have expressed this
as a critical problem here in the County. In accordance with our mission to serve women and
girls we ask the Supervisors to consider supporting future legislation that would create more
fair paying jobs for women and girls.
b. State (if applicable)
c. Other (if applicable)
IV. Anticipated Supporters of proposal: All likely female likely voters in the 5 districts of Contra
Costa County.
V. Anticipated Opponents of proposal: Business owners that have a bottom line and may see
revenue lost leading to higher market values in the district. This also could reduce the amount
parents pay in childcare.
VI. Position on proposal by CSAC or League of California Cities (if available):
Attachment C
Page 107 of 166
VII. Prior History of Proposal (if any):
December 9th 2014, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed the Equal Pay Ordinance
Department: Contra Costa County
Commission for Women
& Girls
Email: laurenababb@gmail.com
Contact Person: Lauren Babb/ Beth Mora Telephone: (313) 452-1107
Title: Member (Describe in one sentence the issue you seek to address with State/Federal
assistance)
Support Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) aka “Dreamers”
Check one: State Platform [ X ] Federal Platform [ ]
Dept. Priority: __2__ of _5___ (e.g. 1 of 3)
VIII. Summary of Proposal:
Please briefly describe the proposal and include the following information (where applicable):
2.. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) aka “Dreamers” - Support
establishing community, education strategies to help ensure due process rights for the 65,000
unauthorized immigrants that include women and families a population that makes up 14 percent
of the Bay Area’s total unauthorized community. According to the Migration Policy Institute, 37
percent of Contra Costa County’s unauthorized-immigrant population has at least one U.S.
citizen under the age of 18 in their household aka
“Dreamer”. https://richmondconfidential.org/2017/09/18/rapid-response-and-legal-aid-project-
for-undocumented-immigrants-up-for-vote-tomorrow/
IX. Action Requested:
Support and include in the 2018 State Legislative priorities.
X. Fiscal Impact:
a. County : According to the Migration Policy Institute, 37 percent of Contra Costa County’s
unauthorized-immigrant population has at least one U.S. citizen under the age of 18 in their
household aka “Dreamer”. https://richmondconfidential.org/2017/09/18/rapid-response-and-
legal-aid-project-for-undocumented-immigrants-up-for-vote-tomorrow/
b. State : Anticipating Governor Brown’s signature for SB 54
c. Other (if applicable)
Attachment C
Page 108 of 166
XI. Anticipated Supporters of proposal: Democratic likely voters and voter over +65 years of age.
The elimination of DACA has the potential to tear apart families in our community. People we
consider our neighbors and friends. This is not a political issue it is a matter of basic respect for
people that have lived and contributed to the Contra Costa economy.
XII. Anticipated Opponents of proposal: Law enforcement
XIII. Position on proposal by CSAC or League of California Cities (if available):
XIV. Prior History of Proposal (if any): SB 54
Department: Contra Costa County
Commission for Women
& Girls
Email: laurenababb@gmail.com
Contact Person: Lauren Babb/ Beth Mora Telephone: (313) 452-1107
Title: Member (Describe in one sentence the issue you seek to address with State/Federal
Support Paid Parental Leave
Check one: State Platform [ X ] Federal Platform [ ]
Dept. Priority: __3__ of _5___ (e.g. 1 of 3)
XV. Summary of Proposal:
Please briefly describe the proposal and include the following information (where applicable):
3. Paid Parental Leave - Supports SB 63 which would require businesses with
fifty (50) or more employees to provide twelve (12) weeks of job-protected parental leave to
eligible workers following childbirth, adoption, or foster care placement. In addition to this
legislation, CCCW supports 6 weeks of fully paid leave to bond with a new child. Require
employers to provide employee compensation to complement the California Paid Family
leave partial compensation benefits so that parents receive full pay during parental
leave. (New legislation, SB63.)
XVI. Action Requested:
Support and include in the 2018 State Legislative priorities.
XVII. Fiscal Impact:
a. County : Operational cost for fair pay data analysis .
State: Exceeds the requirements of SB 63
b. Other (if applicable)
Attachment C
Page 109 of 166
XVIII. Anticipated Supporters of proposal: Women in all 5 districts of Contra Costa County. Families
need time to adjust to a new child this legislation allows parents to enjoy the critical moments
without the undo financial burden.
XIX. Anticipated Opponents of proposal: Local businesses that may not be able to provide coverage
for a person gone for an extended period of time.
XX. Position on proposal by CSAC or League of California Cities (if available):
XXI. Prior History of Proposal (if any): SB 63
Department: Contra Costa County
Commission for Women
& Girls
Email: laurenababb@gmail.com
Contact Person: Lauren Babb/ Beth Mora Telephone: (313) 452-1107
Title: Member (Describe in one sentence the issue you seek to address with State/Federal
. Promote Economic Opportunities for Girls and Women
Check one: State Platform [ X ] Federal Platform [ ]
Dept. Priority: __4__ of _5___ (e.g. 1 of 3)
XXII. Summary of Proposal:
Please briefly describe the proposal and include the following information (where applicable):
4. Promote Economic Opportunities for Girls and Women - Support and promote proven
techniques for engaging girls in the classroom to participate in science, technology, engineering
and math (STEM) by exposing female students to diverse role models and mentors. Nearly one in
four (24%) of those employed in science, technology, engineering and mathematics occupations
are women; women tend to be vastly underrepresented in computer, technology, and
engineering. To improve representation in the workplace for women STEM programs outside the
classroom should increase in collaboration and partnerships with local business that specialize in
STEM.
XXIII. Action Requested:
Support and include in the 2018 State Legislative priorities.
XXIV. Fiscal Impact:
a. County : Conduct county wide survey to assess need for science, technology, engineering
and math.
b. State: Exceeds the requirements of SB 63
c. Other (if applicable)
XXV. Anticipated Supporters of proposal: Women in all 5 districts of Contra Costa County. Economic
opportunity provided by school can only increase our workforce development and boost the
economy.
Attachment C
Page 110 of 166
XXVI. Anticipated Opponents of proposal: N/A
XXVII. Position on proposal by CSAC or League of California Cities (if available):
XXVIII. Prior History of Proposal (if any):
Department: Contra Costa County
Commission for Women
& Girls
Email: laurenababb@gmail.com
Contact Person: Lauren Babb/ Beth Mora Telephone: (313) 452-1107
Title: Member (Describe in one sentence the issue you seek to address with State/Federal
. Access to Menstrual Hygiene Products -
Check one: State Platform [ X ] Federal Platform [ ]
Dept. Priority: __5__ of _5___ (e.g. 1 of 3)
XXIX. Summary of Proposal:
Please briefly describe the proposal and include the following information (where applicable):
. 5. Access to Menstrual Hygiene Products - Support AB 10 requiring school bathrooms
to offer an adequate supply of free menstrual hygiene supplies in school bathrooms and require the
Contra Costa County Housing Authority to ensure that an adequate supply of menstrual hygiene
supplies are available at all shelters in the county. This allows young women to have the same
access to education as boys
XXX. Action Requested:
Support and include in the 2018 State Legislative priorities.
XXXI. Fiscal Impact:
a. County : Cost of providing the necessary products and overhead of Housing Authority.
b. State: AB 10 on Governor Brown’s desk
c. Other (if applicable)
XXXII. Anticipated Supporters of proposal: Women in all 5 districts of Contra Costa County. Girls
should be able to learn without feeling uncomfortable due to financial burden on purchasing
menstrual hygiene products.
XXXIII. Anticipated Opponents of proposal: School Districts and charter schools
XXXIV. Position on proposal by CSAC or League of California Cities (if available):
XXXV. Prior History of Proposal (if any): AB 10
Attachment C
Page 111 of 166
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE 6.
Meeting Date:12/11/2017
Subject:Draft 2018 Federal Legislative Platform
Submitted For: LEGISLATION COMMITTEE,
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: 2017-38
Referral Name: Draft 2018 Federal Platform
Presenter: L. DeLaney Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097
Referral History:
Each fall, the County Administrator’s Office initiates the development of the coming year’s
Federal Legislative Platform by inviting members of the Board of Supervisors, Department Heads
and key staff to provide recommended changes or additions to the current adopted Platform.
In September, departments were invited to provide suggested changes to the Federal Platform by
submitting input in writing.
The Legislation Committee typically reviews the Draft Platform in November and/or December
of each year, with the Proposed Platform recommended to the Board of Supervisors for adoption
in January.
The Draft 2018 Federal Platform in a redline version (showing changes from the adopted 2017
Federal Platform) is Attachment A and a clean-copy version is Attachment B.
Referral Update:
The significant amendments to the 2017 adopted Federal Legislative Platform that are proposed
by staff include the following:
FEDERAL FUNDING NEEDS
Two projects have been recommended for deletion from the list due to the identification of other
revenue sources.
1. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) - $350,000,000 for state and local efforts to sustain and
enhance the effectiveness of their emergency management programs for all hazards preparedness.
3. Safe and Bright Futures for Children Exposed to Domestic Violence and Trauma – $400,000 to
implement the federally funded plan to diminish the damaging effects of domestic violence, and
exposure to early trauma on children and adolescents and to stop the cycle of intentional injury
and abuse.
Page 112 of 166
and abuse.
A policy statement has been recommended for addition: With respect to any proposed federal
Infrastructure bill, the County would support legislative language that includes infrastructure
projects for all elements of stormwater: regional scale flood protection infrastructure (usually
operated by flood control districts), local scale storm drain pipes (operated by cities and
counties), storm water quality treatment facilities (operated by cities and counties), and
groundwater recharge (often operated by special districts, but also cities and counties).
FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
Policy revision to #4 (formerly eBART Extension Next Phase Study/ Environmental and
Engineering), now called Brentwood Intermodal Transit Center (BITC). Project to improve
access, and advance design and development of a transit center located in Brentwood, and serving
Oakley, southeast Antioch, Discovery Bay and Brentwood. The BITC is proposed for Highway 4
between Lone Tree Way and Sand Creek Road and would be served initially by Tri Delta Transit.
Access would be provided via an extension of Heidorn Ranch Road, and the multimodal
Mokelumne Trail. A possible future extension of eBART from the Antioch Station would be
considered later.
Additional text changes are incorporated in the Draft Platform for the most up-to-date project cost
and description information, including to the Surface Transportation Program/Highway Bridge
Funding, as follows:
In addition to the funding levels, the County also supports regulation changes that permit direct
funding to local jurisdictions, bypassing the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local
Assistance. The goals of these changes are to:
Get federal transportation funding into the community as soon as possible to create and
preserve jobs, both in the private sector and the public sector, in America;
Maximize purchasing power by eliminating the burdensome additional administrative
process and cost associated with multiple layers of government between funding and
construction of shovel ready improvement and maintenance projects; and
Fund the critical first and last part of each journey of goods, people, and services ? local
roads of America ? providing certainty for businesses and laying the foundation for lasting
economic growth.
POLICY POSITIONS
Staff recommends the following policy additions to the 2018 Federal Platform:
Aging and Adult Services – Contra Costa County administers grants through the Area Agency on
Aging (AAA). Through public and nonprofit agency contracts, the AAA provides many services
annually for elderly county residents, including group (congregate) meals, rides to congregate
meal sites, nutrition education sessions, home delivered meals, legal assistance, long term care
ombudsman services, in home and respite registry services, home visiting and adult day care,
family caregiver support, assessments for fall prevention and fall prevention exercise classes. The
Older Californians Act provides Title III grants for community services and nutrition.
The County will advocate for the following federal actions: a. OPPOSE the elimination or
reduction of funding for the Older Americans Act and Programming. b. OPPOSE the elimination
or cuts to the Elder Justice Act. The Elder Justice Act, as part of the Patient Protection and
Page 113 of 166
or cuts to the Elder Justice Act. The Elder Justice Act, as part of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, provides federal resources to “prevent, detect, treat, understand, intervene in
and, where appropriate, prosecute elder abuse, neglect and exploitation.” c. OPPOSE elimination
and funding cuts to the Senior Community Service Employment Program, which is the nation’s
oldest program that helps low-income, unemployed individuals aged 55+ years find work.
Child Care:
OPPOSE block granting Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
SUPPORT new comprehensive proposals that would enhance funding and development of
early care and education infrastructure, including increasing supports, services, and
increased compensation for the early education workforce.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to home visiting programs that are designed and
implemented to support families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth
and development of young children.
Child Welfare and Well-being
Modify the Federal Title IV-E Foster Care eligibility income standard from the current 1996
AFDC Federal Poverty Level (100% FPL) to be in line with (and follow) the Medicaid
138% FPL standard.
OPPOSE the elimination or cuts to the Social Services Block Grant and the Adoption
Assistance Program.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to
repeal DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative
efforts that target individuals due to their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Health
OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that
represent significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the health
care system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee categories to a
per-capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for state Medicaid programs.
These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to offset the loss of federal funding.
Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population of approximately 250,000 people,
including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result.
OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly and/or
permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and programming that would
lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs. Reductions in federal human services
funding and programming severely limits critical support for our community and state. Block
grants often lead to decreases in funding that forces states to limit benefits for families, cap
enrollment, and establish waitlists. These restrictions result in families who need these supports
and services, not being able to access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and
distress.
OPPOSE federal legislation and administrative efforts to eliminate or reduce funding for essential
public health services, inclusive of funding for immunization, HIV/Ryan White, Communicable
Disease and Tuberculosis Control, Hansen’s Disease, Teen Pregnancy, Public Health
Preparedness and Maternal Child Health Funding.
Page 114 of 166
SUPPORT reauthorization of funding for HIV/Ryan White Care, Maternal Child Health Funding
including Maternal Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV), and CHIP (Children’s
Health Insurance Program).
Interpersonal Violence – Interpersonal violence, often referred to as intimate partner violence,
domestic violence or battering, is a pattern of behavior used to establish power and control over
another person through fear and intimidation, often including the threat or use of violence. The
abuse can take several forms: physical, emotional, sexual, and economic as well as threats,
stalking/surveillance, isolation and intimidation. Although women are more likely to be targeted,
anyone can be a victim of interpersonal violence including those in the LGBTQ communities,
men, disabled persons, seniors, and elders. The County will advocate for the following federal
actions:
OPPOSE any and all funding cuts, including but not limited to elimination of grant programs
for violence prevention, human/labor trafficking, victim services, and/or issues related to
interpersonal violence. In addition to OPPOSING any threats to cut or eliminate Department
of Justice federal grants related to the Violence Against Women Act.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to cultural responsiveness and language support for
victims of crime.
SUPPORT efforts that promote collaboration and coordination across systems; including the
sharing of confidential or protected information in multidisciplinary team settings in order to
increase support for survivors.
SUPPORT the sustainment and implementation/practice of the Hostile Environment
Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices under the Fair Housing Act
that protects housing access for victims of harassment and survivors of domestic violence.
SUPPORT efforts to protect employment rights for survivors of interpersonal violence.
SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools.
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) - LIHEAP helps low-income
families pay their heating bills. LIHEAP is a grant that offers assistance in the form of a cash
grant, sent directly to the utility company, or a crisis grant for households in immediate danger of
being without heat. Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) enables low-income families to
reduce their energy bills by making their homes more energy efficient. Funds are used to improve
the energy performance of dwellings families in need, using the most advanced technologies and
testing procedures available in the housing industry. The County will advocate for the following
federal actions:
OPPOSE elimination and reduction in funding for the LIHEAP and WAP programs.
Preservation of the federal deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT)--The County opposes
repeal of the federal income tax deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT). Since 1913, the
SALT deduction has been a deduction available to taxpayers in recognition that the portion of
income deducted was spent on state and local public services such as public safety and
transportation. In modern history, the SALT deduction has had a strong correlation to the
mortgage interest deduction. This is because most homeowners pay property taxes on real
property owned in their State, which are subsequently deducted using the SALT deduction on
federal income taxes. For this reason, the SALT deduction can be viewed as a valuable financial
benefit of homeownership. Repeal of the SALT deduction and the corresponding reduction in
financial benefit of homeownership, could lead to a change in market prices of homes to “price
Page 115 of 166
in” the loss of the SALT deduction to homeowners. In California, ad valorem property taxes,
which provide general purpose revenue to local governments, including cities and counties, is
based on the assessed value of, among other things, residential homes. Should a repeal of the
SALT deduction lead to a corresponding reduction in home values, local governments in
California would be negatively impacted by reduced home values.
Public Housing Programs -- Preserve the availability of tax-exempt Private Activity Bonds
which are the most common form of financing of affordable multi-family housing projects.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) -- SUPPORT efforts that would allow
people to apply for CalFresh while incarcerated.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families –
SUPPORT policies that do not penalize work and movement towards financial stability.
Families who are working and receiving modest cash assistance grants to supplement low
earnings should not be subject to the federal time limit on assistance. Running the time limit
clock while a parent is working and receiving such supplements means both that a family
could lose assistance when it has exhausted its time-limited benefits and not be able to
receive additional assistance if the parent loses his/her job. TANF should send a strong
message to recipients that “work pays” – running the clock while a family is working
undermines this message.
Allow temporary exemptions from time limits and work requirements for families
confronting severe employment barriers - including living in an area of high unemployment
or are victims of abuse.
Reauthorize and increase the TANF Block Grant. The allocation of the block grant has not
increased since 1997. Support funding TANF annually by an amount commensurate with the
rate of inflation to ensure that the program’s actual value does not decrease each year.
Workforce Development – The County will OPPOSE cuts to WIOA funding and programming.
Additional text changes are proposed to the Draft 2018 Federal Platform that are included in
Attachment A.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
REVIEW the Draft 2018 Federal Legislative Platform, provide direction to staff on any
recommended changes, and RECOMMEND action to the Board of Supervisors.
Attachments
Attachment A: Draft 2018 Federal Platform--redline
Attachment B: Draft 2018 Federal Platform--clean copy
Page 116 of 166
2018 DRAFT
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE
PLATFORM
Contra Costa County
December 11, 2017
Attachment A--redlined
Page 117 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 2
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
2018 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Each year, the Board of Supervisors adopts a Federal Legislative Platform that establishes
priorities and policy positions with regard to potential federal legislation and regulation.
FEDERAL FUNDING NEEDS
The following list is a preliminary ranking in priority order. Adjustments to the priority order may be appropriate
once the President releases a budget. The current priority ranking gives preference to those projects that we know
will not be included in the President’s budget, with lower priority t o Army Corps of Engineers projects which may be
in the budget. Also, Army Corps project requests will be adjusted to be consistent with Corps capability.
1. Delta LTMS-Pinole Shoal Management, CA – $4,500,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers
to continue a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for levee rehabilitation, dredging and
sediment reuse in the Delta, similar to the effort completed in the Bay area. Levee work, reuse of
dredged sediments, dredging and other activities have been difficult to accomplish due to
permitting problems and a divergence of priorities related to water quality. Significant levee
rehabilitation is critical to the long term stability of these levees and to water quality and supply
for the 23 million Californians who depend upon this water. Stakeholders from the Department
of Water Resources, Ports, Army Corps, levee reclamation districts, local governments and other
interested parties are participating in the LTMS. A Sediment or Dredged Material Management
Office will be established, and in the longer term, preparation of a Sediment Management Plan
will consider beneficial reuse of dredged materials as one potential source of sediment for levees.
(Note: $500,000 appropriated for FFY 2005; $225,000 for FFY 2006; $500,000 for FFY 2007; $462,000
for FFY 2008; $235,000 for FFY 2009; $100,000 for FFY 2010; $0 FFY 2011-2013; $930,000 FFY 2014.)
2. Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine Clean-up – $483,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers to complete
the Technical Planning Process for the clean-up project at the source and downstream area of the
Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine. The project will clean up the mine in a cost effective, environmentally-
sound manner with minimal liability exposure for the County and involving all stakeholders
through an open community-based process. The Corps initiated a Technical Planning Process in
June 2008 to develop a preliminary remediation plan, identify applicable permit and environmental
data requirements and complete a data collection and documentation program for the clean-up of
the area impacted by the Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine. Several phases of the planning process have
been completed, and this appropriation will allow the Corps to continue the planning process,
which will include looking at watershed issues downstream of the mercury mine. The mine site
is located on private property on the northeast slope of Mt. Diablo at the upper end of the Marsh
Creek watershed. (Note: $517,000 appropriated in FFY 2008. We would also like to continue our
request to expand the authority of the Corps through the Restoration of Abandoned Mines Sites (RAMS)
program to go beyond planning work and construct remediation projects. This would be accomplished
with the addition of language in a future Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill)
Deleted: 7
Deleted: 1. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) - $350,000,000
for state and local efforts to sustain and enhance the effectiveness of
their emergency management programs for all hazards preparedness.
In FY 2015, California received more than $27.8 million, the highest
funded-state in the country, of which more than $15.5 million was
sub-allocated to approximately the 58 county Operational Areas
(OAs) for critical hazard preparation activities. Last year
California’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), in accordance
with program guidelines, prioritized the building, sustainment, and
delivery of all-hazards emergency management capabilities in the
following areas: Planning, organization, equipment acquisitions,
training, exercises, Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
construction and renovation, and maintenance and sustainment. Of
particular interest to Contra Costa County is the allowance for funds
to be expended for EOC construction and renovation, as the County
is seeking funding for the development of an EOC.¶
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 3. Safe and Bright Futures for Children Exposed to
Domestic Violence and Trauma – $400,000 to implement the
federally funded plan to diminish the damaging effects of domestic
violence, and exposure to early trauma on children and adolescents
and to stop the cycle of intentional injury and abuse. A three year
assessment and planning process resulted in a program plan that is
working to align and create a system responsive to the needs of
children exposed to domestic violence and trauma through
identification, early intervention; raising awareness; training
professionals; utilizing and disseminating data; establishing
consultation teams to support providers in intervening and using best
practices; and developing targeted services. Exposure to domestic
violence and trauma reshapes the human brain and is the primary
cause of trauma in children’s lives. It influences personality, shapes
personal skills and behaviors, impacts academic performance, and
substantially contributes to the high cost of law enforcement,
civil/criminal justice and social services. Exposure to domestic
violence and trauma is associated with greater rates of substance
abuse, mental illness, and adverse health outcomes in adulthood, and
substantially contributes to the high cost of law enforcement,
civil/criminal justice and social services. (Note: $428,000
appropriated for FFY 2009; $550,000 for FFY 2010.)¶
Deleted: 4
Attachment A--redlined
Page 118 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 3
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
3. CALFED Bay Delta Reauthorization Act Levee Stability Improvement Program (LSIP) –
$8,000,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers for levee rehabilitation planning and project
implementation. The CALFED Reauthorization Act, passed in January 2004, authorized $90
million, which may be appropriated for levee rehabilitation work. The Corps has prepared a “180-
Day Report” which identifies projects and determines how these funds would be spent. Since that
time, the breakdown of CALFED, coupled with the Army Corps’ attempts to define an appropriate
and streamlined process, has delayed funding and resultant levee work. (Note: $500,000
appropriated for FFY 2006; $400,000 for FFY 2007; $4.92M for FFY 2008; $4.844M for FFY 2010.)
4. Suisun Bay Channel/New York Slough Maintenance Dredging – $8,700,000 for the Army
Corps of Engineers for maintenance dredging of this channel to the authorized depth of minus 35
feet. Continued maintenance is essential for safe transport of crude oil and other bulk materials
through the San Francisco Bay, along the Carquinez Straits and into the Sacramento/San Joaquin
Delta. Dredging for this channel section is particularly costly due to requirements on placement of
dredged materials in upland environments. An oil tanker ran aground in early 2001 due to severe
shoaling in a section of this channel, which creates a greater potential for oil spills (Note: $4.559
M appropriated for FFY 2005; $4.619M for FFY 2006; $2.82M for FFY 2007; $2.856M for FFY 2008;
$2.768M for FFY 2009; $3.819M for FFY 2010; $2.715M for FFY 2012; $2.495M for FFY 2013; $2.026M
for FFY 2014.)
5. San Pablo/Mare Island Strait/Pinole Shoal Channel Maintenance Dredging – $8,400,000
for the Army Corps of Engineers for maintenance dredging of the channel to the authorized depth
of minus 35 feet. The Pinole Shoal channel is a major arterial for vessel transport through the San
Francisco Bay region, serving oil refineries and bulk cargo which is transported as far east as
Sacramento and Stockton. (Note: $1M appropriated for FFY 2005; $2.988M for FFY 2006; $896,000
for FFY 2007; $1.696M for FFY 2008; $1.058M for FFY 2009; $2.518M for FFY 2010; $3.402M for FFY
2012; $499,000 for FFY 2013; $780,000 for FFY 2014.)
6. San Francisco to Stockton (J. F. Baldwin and Stockton Channels) Ship Channel Deepening
– $2,700,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers to continue the Deepening Project. Deepening and
minor realignment of this channel will allow for operational efficiencies for many different
industries, an increase in waterborne goods movement, reduced congestion on roadways, and air
quality benefits. This work focused on establishing economic benefit to the nation and initial
salinity modeling in the channel sections. The following steps include detailed channel design,
environmental documentation, cost analysis, additional modeling, and dredged material disposal
options. This project continues to have enormous implications for oil refineries, ports, and other
industries that depend on safe ship transport through the channel. (Note: $500,000 appropriated for
FFY 2005; $200,000 for FFY 2006; $200,000 for FFY 2007; $403,000 for FFY 2008 ; $1.34M for FFY
2009; $0 for FFY 2010; $0 for FFY 2011; $800,000 for FFY 2012; $1,546,900 for FFY 2013; $800,000
for FFY 2014.)
With respect to any proposed federal Infrastructure bill, the County would support legislative
language that includes infrastructure projects for all elements of stormwater: regional scale flood
protection infrastructure (usually operated by flood control districts), local scale storm drain pipes
(operated by cities and counties), storm water quality treatment facilities (operated by cities and
counties), and groundwater recharge (often operated by special districts, but also cities and
counties).
Deleted: 5
Deleted: 6
Deleted: 7
Deleted: 8
Attachment A--redlined
Page 119 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 4
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
The following are priority transportation projects and programs for which federal funding is needed.
1. Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project -- $18 million for improvements to a 2.5-mile
accident-prone section of Vasco Road. Project components include widening the roadway to
accommodate a concrete median barrier and shoulders on either side of the barrier, construction
of the barrier, and extension of an existing passing lane. The project will eliminate cross-median
accidents which have caused numerous fatalities in recent years, and will provide increased
opportunities for vehicles to safely pass (unsafe passing is a major cause of accidents and fatalities
on this segment of the increasingly busy two-lane undivided road). The project will include
provisions for wildlife undercrossings to preserve migration patterns. The proposed improvements
will complement a $10 million project that was funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act funds and completed in 2011.
1.b Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project Continuation -- $30 million for improvements to
the remaining 9 miles of accident-prone sections of Vasco Road. Alameda County has been
working on constructing improvements in their jurisdiction and it would be desirable for the two
counties to work together to complete the gap left in the concrete median barrier near the County
line. In addition to completing this gap, Contra Costa desires to extend the concrete median barrier
further north of the recently completed median barrier project to the Camino Diablo Road
intersection.
2. North Richmond Truck Route -- $25 million to construct a new road or other alternate access
improvements that will provide truck access between businesses and the Richmond Parkway,
moving the truck traffic away from a residential neighborhood and elementary school. This project
will increase safety, improve public health around the school and residential area by reducing
diesel particulate emissions from those areas, increase livability of the neighborhood, improve
local access to the Wildcat Creek Regional Trail, stimulate economic development in the industrial
area of the community and provide a better route for trucks traveling to and from the Richmond
Parkway. Several potential alignments have been identified, one of which was developed through
a community planning process funded through an Environmental Justice planning grant from
Caltrans.
3. Eastern Contra Costa Trail Network -- $11 million for joint planning, environmental review,
right-of-way acquisition and construction of a coordinated network of trails for walking, bicycling
and equestrian uses in eastern Contra Costa County including facilities and projects improving
access to existing or planned transit stations. Eligible trails include, but are not limited to: (1) the
Mokelumne Trail overcrossing of the State Route 4 Bypass ($6 million); (2) Contra Costa
segments of the Great California Delta Trail ($3 million); (3) a transit supportive network of East
Contra Costa trails in unincorporated County areas and the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley
and Pittsburg ($1 million); and Marsh Creek Corridor Multi-Use Path ($1 million).
4. Brentwood Intermodal Transit Center (BITC) -- Project to improve access, and advance design
and development of a transit center located in Brentwood, and serving Oakley, southeast Antioch,
Discovery Bay and Brentwood. The BITC is proposed for Highway 4 between Lone Tree Way and
Sand Creek Road and would be served initially by Tri Delta Transit. Access would be provided
Deleted: ¶
Commented [LD1]: All edits reviewed by PW, DCD and
approved by TWIC.
Deleted: eBART Extension Next Phase Study/Environmental
and Engineering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: $10 million
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Highlight
Attachment A--redlined
Page 120 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 5
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
via an extension of Heidorn Ranch Road, and the multimodal Mokelumne Trail. A possible future
extension of eBART from the Antioch Station would be considered later.
5. Iron Horse Corridor Enhancement Program -- $25 million for joint planning, environmental
review, and the construction of improvements in the Iron Horse Trail Corridor, a 28 mile non-
motorized facility used for commute and recreation purposes providing access to schools,
recreational facilities, commercial areas, residences, and mass transit hubs. Eligible projects
include corridor planning, trail access improvements, trail expansion/enhancements, overcrossings
(7 overcrossings in 5 cities), intersection improvements, Class I trail inter-connectivity projects,
the potential accommodation of shared/autonomous vehicles, and wayfinding/signage projects.
6. State Route 4 / Old River Bridge Study – $1,000,000 to work with San Joaquin County and the
State of California on a study of improving or replacing the Old River Bridge along State Route 4
on the Contra Costa / San Joaquin County line. The study would determine a preferred alternative
for expanding or replacing the existing bridge, which is part of State Route 4. The existing bridge
is narrow, barely allowing two vehicles to pass each other, and is aligned on a difficult angle
relative to the highway on either side, requiring motorists to make sharp turns onto and off of the
bridge. The project would improve safety and traffic flow over the bridge. (Note: no appropriations
for this project as yet.)
7. Kirker Pass Road Truck Climbing Lanes – $7 million for constructing northbound and $20
million for constructing southbound truck climbing lanes on Kirker Pass Road, a heavily used
arterial linking residential areas in eastern Contra Costa with job centers and the freeway system
in central Contra Costa. The truck climbing lanes are needed to improve traffic flow and will also
have safety benefits. The $4.5 million will close a funding gap and augment secured funding: $6
million in Measure J (local sales tax measure) funds and $2.6 million in State Transportation
Improvement Program funds. The $20 million is the total cost of the southbound truck climbing
lane segment.
8. Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector – $80 million for design, engineering and construction
of an east-west connector road between two major arterials that link Contra Costa County with
Alameda and San Joaquin Counties. The Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector will improve
traffic circulation and linkages in the southeastern portion of the County and will provide a new route
for truck traffic that will remove a significant portion of truck trips which currently pass through the
rural community of Byron. Vasco Road is designated as State Route 84, and Byron Highway is under
study as the potential alignment for future State Route 239.
Rural Road Funding Program – The County supports the creation of a new funding program that
will provide funds for converting or upgrading rural roads into more modern and safer roads that
can better handle increasing commuter traffic in growing areas, such as East County. These roads
do not often compete well in current grant programs because they do not carry as many vehicles
as roads in more congested urban or suburban areas. As a result, improvements such as widenings
(turn lanes, clear zone/recovery areas, etc.), realignments, drainage improvements and intersection
modifications often go unfunded, leaving such roads with operational and safety problems as well
as insufficient capacity.
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Deleted: for environmental review and engineering work on the
project identified in the Bay Area Rapid Transit District’s (BART)
eBART Next Segment Study in eastern Contra Costa County. With
regard to additional stations and eBART rail corridor alignment
tasks may include, but not necessarily be limited to, completion of
environmental review, and partial completion of engineering.
Additional work may include, but not necessarily be limited to,
evaluation and refinement of alignment and stations, development of
capital and operating costs, land use analysis, completion of
environmental review including appropriate mitigations,
development of preliminary engineering, and public outreach.
(Potential Program: FTA – New Starts, FHWA/FTA Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality)
Deleted: ¶
¶
7. Knightsen/Byron Area Transportation Study - $300,000 to re-
evaluate the Circulation Element of the County General Plan (GP) to
improve its consistency with the Urban Limit Line (ULL) and
related policies that ensure preservation of non-urban, agricultural,
open space and other areas identified outside the ULL. Policies will
be evaluated to provide a more efficient and affordable circulation
system for the study area, serve all transportation user-groups,
support the local agricultural economy and accommodate the
commuter traffic destined for employment centers outside the study
area. Zoning and development regulations would be updated to
implement the study recommendations.
Deleted: 8
Deleted: 4.5
Deleted: 9
Deleted: 3
Attachment A--redlined
Page 121 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 6
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Transportation Funding for Disabled, Low-income, and Elderly Persons – Transit services for
elderly, disabled, and low-income persons are provided by the County, by some cities, by all of the
bus transit operators, and by many community organizations and non-profits that provide social
services. Increased funding is needed to provide and maintain more service vehicles, operate them
longer throughout the day, upgrade the vehicle fleet and dispatching systems, improve coordination
between public providers and community groups that also provide such services to their clients (a
need well-established by the Government Accountability Office (GAO)), expand outreach
programs to inform potential riders of the available services, and expedite deployment of efficient
new technologies and systems, among other needs. The County supports continuation and
increased funding levels for federal funding programs dedicated to transit services for these
population groups and to incentivize improvements in service delivery models to take advantage
of advances in mobile data. All of the demographic trends point to a growing need for such services
in the future. For example, the 65-and-older population in the Bay Area is projected to more than
double by the year 2030.
Surface Transportation Program/Highway Bridge Funding – The County supports the
continuation of funding levels consistent with the Highway Bridge funding program in
previous transportation funding bills that will provide funds for rehabilitating and replacing
our aging bridges. The County has several aging bridges with deficient sufficiency ratings.
Without federal transportation funding, these expensive projects would be deferred because
they often exceed the County’s funding capacity. Many of the bridges are on critical commute
corridors, goods movement corridors, inter-regional routes, and farm to market routes. Failure
of these important transportation assets can cause major disruptions to the transportation
network. The County would also support federal funding for the rehabilitation and
replacement of rail bridges.
In addition to the funding levels, the County also supports regulation changes that permit direct
funding to local jurisdictions, bypassing the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local
Assistance. The goals of these changes are to:
Get federal transportation funding into the community as soon as possible to create and
preserve jobs, both in the private sector and the public sector, in America;
Maximize purchasing power by eliminating the burdensome additional administrative
process and cost associated with multiple layers of government between funding and
construction of shovel ready improvement and maintenance projects; and
Fund the critical first and last part of each journey of goods, people, and services ‐ local
roads of America ‐ providing certainty for businesses and laying the foundation for
lasting economic growth.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 122 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 7
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
APPROPRIATIONS AND GRANTS – SUPPORT POSITIONS
The following support positions are listed in alphabetic order and do not reflect priority order. Please note
that new and revised positions are highlighted.
1. Buchanan Field Airport – The County approved a Master Plan for the Buchanan Field Airport in
October 2008, which included a Business Plan for project implementation; all of which completed
a previously approved Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Study. The comprehensive
planning effort has ideally positioned Buchanan Field Airport for future aviation (general aviation,
corporate aviation and commercial airline service) and aviation-related opportunities. To facilitate
the economic development potential, the Business Plan prioritizes necessary infrastructure
improvements for Buchanan Field Airport (including development of a general aviation
terminal/administration building and potential replacement of the 65 year old control tower).
Further, as the Airport is surrounded by urban residential uses, enhancing the noise program
infrastructure is deemed essential for balancing the aviation needs with those of the surrounding
communities. The Federal government, primarily through the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), provides funding for planning, analysis, and infrastructure improvements. The County will
support funding in all these areas for protection and enhancement of our aviation facility and
network.
2. Byron Airport – The Byron Airport is poised for future general and corporate aviation and aviation-
related development, but that future growth and full build out of the airport as shown in the Master
Plan is dependent upon utility and infrastructure improvements (such as improved road access and
sewer and water connections) both on and around the Airport. The Byron Airport Business Plan
prioritizes infrastructure and possible additional land acquisition to assist the Byron Airport in
fulfilling its aviation and economic development potential. The Federal government, primarily
through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provides funding for planning, analysis,
infrastructure improvements and aviation land acquisition. The County will support funding in all
these areas for protection and enhancement of our aviation facility and network.
3. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program – Advocate/support funding
up to or above the authorized amount of $2 billion for the EECBG Program established and
authorized under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. The County’s ability
to continue offering programs/services improving energy efficiency and conservation while also
creating jobs is contingent upon additional federal funding being appropriated to the EECBG
Program in 2012 and beyond. Contra Costa and other local governments have identified and
designed many successful programs and financial incentives targeting both the private and public
sector which are now being implemented using EECBG funding authorized through the ARRA of
2009. Funding for the EECBG program is necessary to ensure the nation’s local governments can
continue their leadership in creating clean energy jobs, reducing energy consumption and curbing
greenhouse gas emissions.
4. Multimodal National Freight Network – In 2015 the primary freight network was established
pursuant to MAP-21. The County supports increases in dedicated freight funding as proposed in the
National Freight Strategic Plan. The County will pursue grants and appropriations for 1) the
Northern Waterfront Initiative – specifically, funding for a short-line railroad feasibility study for
the Northern Waterfront Corridor and a Land-Use Cost-Benefit/Fiscalization study for the Northern
Deleted: ¶
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: Not Highlight
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Deleted:
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Attachment A--redlined
Page 123 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 8
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Waterfront; and 2) consistent with the Draft National Freight Strategic Plan congestion reduction
strategy, projects along the I-680 corridor.
5. Regional Habitat Planning and Conservation – $85 million to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
“Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund” to keep pace with land costs and the
increasing number of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) throughout the country. The County will
support funding for the Fund to be restored to $85 million, the 2010 funding level. This will provide
much needed support to regional HCPs in California and nationally, including the East Contra Costa
County HCP. Given the prolific growth in the number of regional HCPs, the Fund needs to be
increased even more substantially in subsequent years. The East Contra Costa County HCP has
received $37.5 million from the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund in the past ten
years and continuing this grant support is of vital importance to the successful implementation of
that Plan. The County will pursue increasing appropriations to the Fund in partnership with
numerous counties in northern and southern California and will support requests of the California
Habitat Conservation Planning Coalition to increase the Fund up to $85 million.
6. San Francisco Bay Improvement Act – $1 billion restoration bill authored by Congresswoman
Jackie Speier in 2010 but not passed. The bill, if passed, will help finance restoration of more than
100,000 acres of the Bay's tidal wetlands. Funds from the bill would implement a restoration plan
that was adopted in 1993. In addition to benefits for fish and wildlife, wetlands restoration will create
new jobs and provide regional economic infusions, as well as protect against the effects of sea level
rise on the Bay's shores.
7. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area – a bill authored by Senator Dianne
Feinstein in 2010 but not passed. The bill, if passed, will authorize and fund a National Heritage Area
(NHA) for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The NHA designation would be a first step in providing
federal resources to agencies in the Delta for economic development and environmental protection.
Contra Costa County supports the legislation and participated in a feasibility study for the NHA
through our seat on the Delta Protection Commission, which completed the study in 2012.
8. Stormwater Program Funding - $2 million to fund additional compliance costs required by the Clean
Water Act. The Regional Water Quality Control Board issues the County a Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System (MS4) permit every five years, requiring the County to remove pollutants from
stormwater prior to entering the storm drain system. The County has a dedicated revenue source for
funding stormwater services derived from an assessment on every parcel in the County, which
generates about $3 million per year in the unincorporated communities. The Regional Board issued
a new MS4 permit that will increase costs dramatically over the next five years, starting with a 25%
increase and the following year by an increase of almost five times current costs. In 2012, the County
attempted to increase the parcel assessment for stormwater services but the voters turned it down. The
County needs additional funding through the Environmental Protection Agency, the source of the MS4
requirements, to help pay for compliance costs. Staff estimates the cost for compliance in 2018 at $5
million, which is $2 million more than current budget.
Deleted: including the High Occupancy Vehicle Lane - Direct
Access Ramp project
Deleted: nine
Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Black
Deleted: The County will also request that the California State
Association of Counties (CSAC) include this Fund increase as a
priority on CSAC’s federal platform.¶
Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: -0.38", Numbered
+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 +
Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5", Tab
stops: 0", Left
Deleted: 700,000
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Condensed by 0.1 pt
Formatted: Not Highlight
Deleted: recently
Deleted: next year
Deleted: .
Formatted: Not Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Italic, Condensed by
0.1 pt
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redlined
Page 124 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 9
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
POLICY POSITIONS
The following support positions are listed in alphabetic order and do not reflect priority order. Please note
that new and revised policy positions are highlighted.
Aging and Adult Services – Contra Costa County administers grants through the Area Agency on
Aging (AAA). Through public and nonprofit agency contracts, the AAA provides many services
annually for elderly county residents, including group (congregate) meals, rides to congregate meal
sites, nutrition education sessions, home delivered meals, legal assistance, long term care
ombudsman services, in home and respite registry services, home visiting and adult day care,
family caregiver support, assessments for fall prevention and fall prevention exercise classes. The
Older Californians Act provides Title III grants for community services and nutrition.
The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
a. OPPOSE the elimination or reduction of funding for the Older Americans Act and
Programming.
b. OPPOSE the elimination or cuts to the Elder Justice Act. The Elder Justice Act, as
part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, provides federal resources
to “prevent, detect, treat, understand, intervene in and, where appropriate, prosecute
elder abuse, neglect and exploitation.”
c. OPPOSE elimination and funding cuts to the Senior Community Service
Employment Program, which is the nation’s oldest program that helps low-income,
unemployed individuals aged 55+ years find work.
Affordable Housing and Homeless Programs – For Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s
Homeless Assistance Grants, including the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program, the
County will support funding that does not include set-asides or other requirements that limit local
communities’ ability to respond to the particular needs in their areas. For the Housing Assistance
for People with AIDS (HOPWA) program, the County will support legislation to update the
formula used to allocate HOPWA grants to reflect local housing costs as well as the number of
AIDS cases.
The County supports full funding for HUD homeless assistance programs, including the ESG
Program, and funding for full implementation of the Homeless Emergency and Rapid Transition
to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009.
The County supports funding the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Resources made
available through the Trust Fund should be accessible to local housing and community
development agencies, including public housing authorities. The Housing Trust Fund should be
used to complement and not supplant either the HOME or CDBG programs.
Agricultural Pest and Disease Control – Agriculture and native environments in Contra Costa
County continue to be threatened by a variety of invasive/exotic pests, diseases and non-native
weeds. The Federal government provides funding for research, regulation, pest exclusion
activities, survey and detection, pest management, weed control, public education and outreach.
The County will support funding in all these areas for protection of our agricultural industry and
open space. Consistent with the policy position, the County will also support legislation which
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redlined
Page 125 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 10
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
would authorize and direct the USDA to provide state and local funding for High Risk Prevention
programs (also called Pest Detection Funding).
Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials – As the beneficial reuse of dredged materials has a clear
public benefit, particularly in the Delta, the County will continue to support beneficial reuse in
general and also continue to advocate for funding for a federal study to determine the feasibility
of beneficial reuse, considering the benefits and impacts to water quality and water supply in the
Delta, navigation, flood control damage, ecosystem restoration, and recreation. The study would
include the feasibility of using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for the dredged material, for
levee maintenance and/or ecosystem restoration. Language to authorize the study was included in
the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) which was passed into law on November 8,
2007.
Broadband – Consistent with CSAC policy, Contra Costa County will support the expansion of
broadband (high speed internet service) to drive economic development and job opportunities,
support county service delivery, and improve health, education and public safety outcomes for
residents. For communities to realize these full benefits of broadband it must be capable of
supporting current technology.
Access and adoption are both necessary elements that should be supported in state and federal
legislative or regulatory proposals. This entails the following:
• Establishing and maintaining reliable broadband in unserved or underserved communities;
• Promoting the knowledge, skills and behaviors that comprise digital literacy;
• Making broadband affordable for all households;
• Maximizing funding for infrastructure; and
• Reducing infrastructure deployment barriers.
Child Care – Research continues to show that quality, affordable childcare is a necessity to
ensuring a family’s stability and economic success. Currently in Contra Costa County, there are
over 10,000 low-income children eligible for affordable childcare services, yet only 29% of that
need is met. Research also shows that in addition to a child’s long-term success with school and
employment, investing in high-quality early care and education results in a higher than average
return on investments in the areas of crime reduction and positive health, education and economic
outcomes.
With regards to childcare, the County will support efforts that ensure all children have access to
quality care by expanding high quality learning opportunities for children 0-5, including but not
limited to proposals such as:
An increase of over 100,000 new childcare slots and $12 billion over the next 10 years;
A focus on children and their families who are at or below 200% of poverty;
Financing through a new cost-sharing partnership with states, already a proven successful
model with Head Start in Contra Costa County.
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: •
Formatted: Font: Times New Roman
Formatted: List Paragraph, Indent: Left: 0.25", Hanging:
0.25", Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at:
0.75"
Deleted: •
Deleted: •
Deleted: •
Deleted: •
Deleted: any proposed continuation of the President’s “Preschool
for All” Initiative meant to close America’s school readiness gap and
Formatted: Not Highlight
Deleted: . This proposal includes
Attachment A--redlined
Page 126 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 11
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
The County will also advocate for the following federal actions:
Increase funding to support employment of low-income families through greater access to
child care subsidies, and increase the access of children from eligible families to high-
quality care that supports positive child development outcomes.
Provide flexibility at the state and local levels so that quality care can be balanced with
access and parental choice.
Reauthorization of Head Start that includes consideration of a regional approach to
determining eligibility and reforming the Head Start Designation Renewal System by
suspending the use of the lowest 10 percent of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System
trigger.
OPPOSE block granting Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
SUPPORT new comprehensive proposals that would enhance funding and development of
early care and education infrastructure, including increasing supports, services, and
increased compensation for the early education workforce.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to home visiting programs that are designed and
implemented to support families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth
and development of young children.
Child Support –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
Eliminate the $25 fee for non-IV-A families.
Restore the incentive match payments that were prohibited in the Deficit Reduction Act.
Allow the automatic use of cash medical support to reimburse Medicaid expenditures.
Allow IV-D agencies to access Health Insurance records for the purposes of Medical
Support.
Child Welfare and Well-being –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
Provide states with financial incentives, as opposed to monetary penalties, under the Child
and Family Services Reviews and minimize the significant administrative burden
associated with the review process.
Modify the Federal Title IV-E Foster Care eligibility income standard from the current
1996 AFDC Federal Poverty Level (100% FPL) to be in line with (and follow) the
Medicaid 138% FPL standard.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 127 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 12
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Increase prevention dollars to help maintain children safely in their own homes. Federal
funding currently gives disproportional support to out-of-home care rather than to
preventing children from coming into care.
Any increase in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage should include an associated
increase in the Title IV-E matching rate to help support children in foster care.
OPPOSE The Family First Prevention Services Act for our Children, an Act that would
curtail California’s Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) efforts and would result in poor
outcomes for especially vulnerable abused and neglected children.
OPPOSE the elimination or cuts to the Social Services Block Grant and the Adoption
Assistance Program.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and
HOME Programs – The County’s ability to continue funding to a variety of nonprofit agencies
that provide critical safety net services to lower income residents, including financing the
development of affordable housing is threatened by further cuts as part of the Budget Control Act
(Act) passed by Congress in July 2011. The Act established mandatory spending caps on most
federal programs through 2021, and arranged additional across-the-board annual spending cuts to
federal defense and non-defense discretionary (NDD) programs over this same period.
Included in non-defense discretionary programs are critical local government oriented programs
including the CDBG, ESG and HOME programs. These programs are successful and productive,
leveraging significant funding from non-federal sources to help spur economic development. The
County agrees that reducing the federal deficit is an important component of achieving long-term
national economic stability, but targeting solely NDD programs like the CDBG, ESG and HOME
programs will not achieve significant reductions and will hinder the County’s ability to provide
critical services to its most vulnerable populations. The County will continue to oppose any further
reductions in the CDBG, ESG and HOME programs as part of the Budget Control Act or any other
means.
Cost Shifts to Local and State Government – Contra Costa County performs many of its services
and programs pursuant to federal direction and funding. Other services and programs are
performed at the behest of the state, which receives funding through the federal government. In
the past, the Administration’s budget has contained significant cuts to entitlement programs and/or
caps on entitlements. Such actions could shift cost of services from the federal government to the
state and/or local governments (and to the extent that costs would shift to the state, it is highly
likely that these would be passed on to the County). The County will oppose any actions that
would result in cost shifts on federal entitlement programs or which would result on greater
dependency on county funded programs. In addition, the County will support federal and state
financial assistance to aid county and local government efforts to meet unfunded federal mandates,
such as those contained in the National Response Plan (NRP), the National Infrastructure
Protection Plan (NIPP), and the National Incident Management System.
Deleted: ¶
End Title IV-E disallowances from federal audits that take away
funds from an already resource-strapped child welfare system.
Allow states to reinvest these funds in preventing child abuse and
neglect. ¶
Attachment A--redlined
Page 128 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 13
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Criminal Justice and Mental Health – Contra Costa County supports the Mental Health and Safe
Communities Act, which strengthens federal programs related to mental health in the criminal
justice system by enhancing the ability of families and communities to identify mental illness; and
the Comprehensive Justice and Mental Health Act, which would update the Mentally Ill Offender
and Treatment Crime Reduction Act (MIOTCRA) and facilitate collaboration among the criminal
justice, juvenile justice, mental health treatment, and substance use systems to ensure that people
with mental illnesses receive the support they need.
An increasing number of people with mental illnesses are coming into contact with the criminal
justice system—with law enforcement, courts, jails and prisons, and probation and parole
agencies—at a tremendous cost to taxpayers and public safety, as well as to these people and their
families. According to a U.S. Department of Justice report, approximately 45 percent of people in
federal prisons, 56 percent of people in state prisons, and 64 percent of people in local jails
displayed symptoms of a mental health condition.
The County will also support the mental health and criminal justice provisions in legislation that
support and expand bipartisan initiatives across the country (including the Stepping Up initiative),
such as specialized law enforcement training, mental health courts, and other collaborative
responses to people in the criminal justice system who have mental health and substance use
treatment needs. The County will also support legislation that provides resources for programs in
correctional facilities, as well as resources to improve reentry outcomes for people with mental
illnesses released from incarceration back into the community, and authorizing the creation of a
specialized National Criminal Justice and Mental Health Training and Technical Assistance
Center.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to
repeal DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative
efforts that target individuals due to their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Delta Water Platform –To protect the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from various detrimental
forces that are affecting its health and resources, it is the policy of Contra Costa County to support
implementation of projects and actions that will help improve the Delta ecosystem and the
economic conditions of the Delta. Contra Costa County has adopted a Delta Water Platform to
identify and promote activities and policy positions that support the creation of a healthy
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Contra Costa County will use this Platform to guide its own actions
and advocacy in other public venues regarding the future of the Delta.
Designation of Indian Tribal Lands and Indian Gaming – The Board of Supervisors has
endorsed the California State Association of Counties’ (CSAC) policy documents regarding
development on tribal land and prerequisites to Indian gaming. These policy statements address
local government concerns for such issues as the federal government’s ability to take lands into
trust and thus remove them from local land use jurisdiction, absent the consent of the state and
the affected county; the need for tribes to be responsible for all off-reservation
impacts of their actions; and assurance that local government will be able to continue to meet
its governmental responsibilities for the health, safety, environment, infrastructure and general
Commented [LD2]: Submitted by Public Health Director.
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Not Italic
Deleted: developed
Attachment A--redlined
Page 129 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 14
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
welfare of all members of its communities. The County will continue to advocate for federal
legislation and regulation that supports the CSAC policy documents.
The County will also advocate for limitations on reservation shopping; tightening the definition of
Class II gaming machines; assuring protection of the environment and public health and safety;
and full mitigation of the off-reservation impacts of the trust land and its operations, including the
increased cost of services and lost revenues to the County.
The County will also advocate for greater transparency, accountability and appeal opportunities
for local government in the decision-making processes that permit the establishment of Indian
gaming facilities. This includes sequencing the processes so that the Indian Lands Determination
comes first, prior to initiation of a trust land request and associated environmental review.
The County will also consider support for federal action and/or legislation that allows Class III
gaming at the existing gaming facility only if it can be shown that any change would result in a
facility that would be unique in nature and the facility can demonstrate significant community
benefits above and beyond the costs associated with mitigating community impacts.
Economic Development Programs – Congress should fund all the complementary programs
within HUD’s community and economic development toolkit, ensuring that HUD does not lose
sight of the development component of its mission. To that end, the County will support continued
funding for the Section 108 loan guarantee program, the Brownfields Economic Development
Initiative and the Rural Housing and Economic Development program. Each of these programs
plays a unique role in building stronger, more economically viable communities, while enabling
communities to leverage external financing in a way the CDBG program alone cannot do.
Federal “Statewideness” Requirements – For many federally funded programs, there is a
“statewideness” requirement; i.e., all counties must operate the specific program under the same
rules and regulations. This can hamper the County’s ability to meet local needs, to be cost effective
and to leverage the funding of one program to reduce costs in another program. Contra Costa
County cannot negotiate for federal waivers or do things differently because it is not a state, yet
its population is greater than seven states. Recognizing this is a very long-term effort, the County
will advocate for relaxation of the “statewideness” rule to allow individual counties or a
consortium of counties to receive direct waivers from the federal government and/or adopt the
rules and regulations currently in use in another state for specific programs.
Habitat Conservation Planning – The County will advocate for elevating the profile of locally
controlled, regional Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) such as the East Contra Costa County
HCP within Congress and Administration so that these critical federal/state/local partnerships can
receive necessary attention and support. HCPs are flagship programs for the federal government
and supporting effective implementation of approved HCPs should be a top priority for the U.S.
Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and HCPs should be a key tool in
any federal climate change or economic stimulus legislation.
Habitat Conservation Permitting and Permit Alignment – The County will advocate for and
support efforts to align federal permits for natural resource impacts federal with permits already
Attachment A--redlined
Page 130 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 15
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
issued by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to a locally-controlled, regional Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP), such as East Contra Costa County HCP. One good example of this is
the U.S. Army Corps’ issuance of Regional General Permit 1 which was designed to be consistent
with the East Contra Costa County HCP. The alignment of permit requirements and processes
improves the overall efficiency, predictability and effectiveness of natural resource regulation and
project delivery.
Health – The County will advocate for the following actions by the federal government: a) provide
enhanced Medicaid FMAP (the "Federal Medical Assistance Percentage" for Medicaid. It is the
federal matching rate for state Medicaid expenditures.); b) suspend the Medicare “clawback” rule;
c) suspend the “60-day rule” that requires states to repay the federal government overpayments
identified by the state prior to collection, and even in instances where the state can never collect;
d) ease the ability to cover those eligible for Medicaid by making documentation requirements less
stringent; and e) prevent the implementation of the following seven federal regulations:
Outpatient hospital
Case Management
School Based Administration & Transportation
Public Provider Cost Limit
Graduate Medical Education
Rehabilitation Services Option
Provider Tax
SUPPORT full funding of the Federal Medicaid program by the federal government. Medicaid
provides access to health care for people whose income and resources are insufficient to pay for
health care. It is jointly funded by Federal and State governments. The Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (also known as the ACA) significantly expanded both eligibility for and
federal funding of Medicaid. OPPOSE amendments to the ACA that would reduce support for
Medicaid/Medi-Cal payments to providers.
OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that represent
significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the health care
system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee categories to a per-
capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for state Medicaid programs.
These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to offset the loss of federal funding.
Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population of approximately 250,000 people,
including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result.
OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly and/or
permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and programming that would
lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs. Reductions in federal human services
funding and programming severely limits critical support for our community and state. Block
grants often lead to decreases in funding that forces states to limit benefits for families, cap
enrollment, and establish waitlists. These restrictions result in families who need these supports
and services, not being able to access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and distress.
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD3]: Submitted by HSD.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 131 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 16
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
OPPOSE federal legislation and administrative efforts to eliminate or reduce funding for essential
public health services, inclusive of funding for immunization, HIV/Ryan White, Communicable
Disease and Tuberculosis Control, Hansen’s Disease, Teen Pregnancy, Public Health Preparedness
and Maternal Child Health Funding.
SUPPORT reauthorization of funding for HIV/Ryan White Care, Maternal Child Health Funding
including Maternal Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV), and CHIP (Children’s
Health Insurance Program).
Homeless / Runaway Youth –The County will support continued investment in the Runaway and
Homeless Youth Act to ensure that all youth have access to housing and other critical services.
Homelessness among young people is a serious issue. Homeless youth, sometimes referred to as
unaccompanied youth, are individuals who lack parental, foster or institutional care. Homeless
youth are at a higher risk for physical abuse, sexual exploitation, mental health disabilities,
substance abuse, and death. It is estimated that 5,000 unaccompanied youth die each year as a
result of assault, illness, or suicide. In Contra Costa County youth under the age of 18 years make
up approximately 11% of the homeless population and two thirds of those youth reside in shelters
on any given night.
Human Trafficking – Human Trafficking is the illegal recruitment, transportation, harboring,
provision or obtaining of people (by force, fraud or coercion), typically for the purposes of forced
labor or commercial sexual exploitation. Nearly 20.9 million people around the world fall victim
to this multi-billion dollar industry. In the past year Contra Costa partners on a Federal human
trafficking grant have served over 136 victims of human trafficking. Of those served 1,871 units
of services were provided across 22 different categories of service such as legal services, protection
and safety planning, family reunification and more. Women and girls are the predominant groups
of people that are harmed by these actions.
The County will advocate for the following federal actions to insure support and services for
victims of human trafficking, and the systems that help them:
• SUPPORT federal funding that effectively enables service providers to assist victims and
law enforcement to prosecute traffickers. Because it takes a well-resourced multi-faceted
approach to support victims and to insure traffickers are prosecuted support cross-system,
comprehensive approaches to prevent human trafficking.
• SUPPORT efforts that increase the level of training, awareness, and funding to address
promising practices related to labor trafficking (including the hospitality industry,
restaurants, etc.). Victims of trafficking may be found everywhere– some may be found
working against their will in hotels/motels for long hours for little or no pay. Labor
trafficking has been found in diverse labor settings including domestic work, restaurants,
nail salons, small businesses, large farms, and factories.
Interpersonal Violence – Interpersonal violence, often referred to as intimate partner violence,
domestic violence or battering, is a pattern of behavior used to establish power and control over
another person through fear and intimidation, often including the threat or use of violence. The
Formatted: Font: Italic, Not Highlight
Deleted: In the last two years Contra Costa partners on a Federal
human trafficking grant have served over 240 victims of human
trafficking.
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD4]: Proposed by Contra Costa County
Commission for Women (CCCW).
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Not Bold, Not Highlight
Attachment A--redlined
Page 132 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 17
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
abuse can take several forms: physical, emotional, sexual, and economic as well as threats,
stalking/surveillance, isolation and intimidation. Although women are more likely to be targeted,
anyone can be a victim of interpersonal violence including those in the LGBTQ communities, men,
disabled persons, seniors, and elders. The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
OPPOSE any and all funding cuts, including but not limited to elimination of grant
programs for violence prevention, human/labor trafficking, victim services, and/or issues
related to interpersonal violence. In addition to OPPOSING any threats to cut or eliminate
Department of Justice federal grants related to the Violence Against Women Act.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to cultural responsiveness and language support for
victims of crime.
SUPPORT efforts that promote collaboration and coordination across systems; including
the sharing of confidential or protected information in multidisciplinary team settings in
order to increase support for survivors.
SUPPORT the sustainment and implementation/practice of the Hostile Environment
Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices under the Fair Housing Act
that protects housing access for victims of harassment and survivors of domestic violence.
SUPPORT efforts to protect employment rights for survivors of interpersonal violence.
SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools.
Levee Restoration and Repair – The County will support legislation such as H.R. 6484, the SAFE
Levee Act (Garamendi) in 2012, which will authorize the U.S. Department of the Interior to invest
in Delta levee repairs, for all levees that are publicly owned or publicly maintained. The bill also
requires a cost-benefit analysis for the tunnel project being planned as part of the Bay-Delta
Conservation Plan.
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) - LIHEAP helps low-income
families pay their heating bills. LIHEAP is a grant that offers assistance in the form of a cash grant,
sent directly to the utility company, or a crisis grant for households in immediate danger of being
without heat. Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) enables low-income families to reduce
their energy bills by making their homes more energy efficient. Funds are used to improve the
energy performance of dwellings families in need, using the most advanced technologies and
testing procedures available in the housing industry. The County will advocate for the following
federal actions:
OPPOSE elimination and reduction in funding for the LIHEAP and WAP programs.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 133 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 18
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Multi-Service Centers – The County will support federal funding for the establishment and
operation of coordinated service integration models such as SparkPoint, Service Integration
Teams, Family Resource Centers, or Family Justice Centers. Multi-service centers often co-locate
county and non-profit agencies working holistically to meet the needs of families. Centers can help
individuals and families address immediate financial crises, build financial security, address abuse
and violence, provide accessible, coordinated public services, and may, engage families in
resident-driven efforts to revitalize their communities.
Municipal Securities – The County supports efforts to preserve, enhance and streamline the
availability of tax-exempt financing to fund critical public infrastructure projects. For over 100
years, federal tax policy has granted a tax exemption on municipal bond interest to incentivize
investment in local infrastructure projects. Also, the federal government has occasionally provided
“direct subsidy bonds” that further mitigate borrowing costs to local government.
Preservation for the Tax-Exemption for Municipal Bonds: The County will support the
continued exemption of municipal bond interest.
Opposition to Repeal of the “Tower Amendment” to the Securities Acts Amendments of
1975: The Tower Amendment to the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 has prohibited
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (MSRB) from directly or indirectly regulating state and local
government issuers of municipal securities prior to the sale of those securities. The County
will oppose any repeal of the Tower Amendment which would impose an additional federal
regulatory oversight burden on local government issuers, in recognition that the states
already have such authority.
Private Activity Bonds for Government Buildings: The County will support legislation that
would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private
parties to help finance government buildings. The tax-exempt bonding mechanism would
allow state and local governments to issue private activity bonds to finance the construction
and upkeep of certain publically owned buildings. The County will support amending the
federal tax code to provide another layer of tax-exempt financing that would encourage the
use of public-private partnerships.
Pension – The County will support legislation that would modify the Internal Revenue Code and
corresponding regulations to permit public employees to make an irrevocable election between
their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula.
In 2006, Contra Costa County and the Deputy Sheriff’s Association jointly obtained state
legislation that would allow members of the Association to make a one-time irrevocable election
between their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula, called Tier C. Orange
County and its labor organizations obtained similar legislation in 2009. However, neither
County has been able to implement this state legislation because such elections currently have
negative tax consequences for employees and for retirement plans under federal tax law as
interpreted by the Internal Revenue Service.
Deleted:
Attachment A--redlined
Page 134 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 19
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Like many local government entities nationwide, the County’s fiscal position would benefit
greatly from reduced pension costs. Allowing local government entities to implement collective
bargaining agreements and state legislation that permits employees to elect less rich pension
formulas would be a significant step in reducing pension costs.
Preservation of the federal deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT)--The County opposes
repeal of the federal income tax deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT). Since 1913, the SALT
deduction has been a deduction available to taxpayers in recognition that the portion of income
deducted was spent on state and local public services such as public safety and transportation. In
modern history, the SALT deduction has had a strong correlation to the mortgage interest
deduction. This is because most homeowners pay property taxes on real property owned in their
State, which are subsequently deducted using the SALT deduction on federal income taxes. For
this reason, the SALT deduction can be viewed as a valuable financial benefit of homeownership.
Repeal of the SALT deduction and the corresponding reduction in financial benefit of
homeownership, could lead to a change in market prices of homes to “price in” the loss of the
SALT deduction to homeowners. In California, ad valorem property taxes, which provide general
purpose revenue to local governments, including cities and counties, is based on the assessed value
of, among other things, residential homes. Should a repeal of the SALT deduction lead to a
corresponding reduction in home values, local governments in California would be negatively
impacted by reduced home values.
Public Housing Programs – The County will support legislation that results in the transformation
of existing programs to improve their effectiveness and efficiency, in tandem with the design of
new and innovative responses, both to build upon recent progress and address outstanding issues.
The County will support legislation to protect the nation’s investment in Public Housing:
Enact affordable housing industry proposal to allow public housing agencies (PHAs)
to voluntarily convert public housing units to Section 8 project-based rental assistance
in order to preserve this vital component of the national infrastructure.
Oppose the Administration’s proposal to impose a $1 billion offset against the
operating reserves of responsible, entrepreneurial PHAs.
Support the revitalization of severely distressed public housing units.
Address safety and security concerns connected to drug-related crime.
The County will support legislation to preserve vital community and economic development
programs:
Fully fund the Community Development Block Grant Program in order to create and
save jobs, revitalize local economies, and support critical services for vulnerable
populations.
Maintain funding for HUD’s cost-effective economic development tools.
Formatted: Font: Italic
Commented [LD5]: Submitted by CAO staff.
Formatted: Font: Italic
Attachment A--redlined
Page 135 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 20
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
The County will support legislation to strengthen and simplify the Section 8 Rental Assistance
programs:
Provide adequate funding for Housing Assistance Payment contract renewals and
ongoing administrative fees.
Enact the Section Eight Voucher Reform Act (SEVRA).
Implement overdue regulatory and administrative revisions that ensure the efficient use
of program funds.
The County will support legislation to maintain and expand Affordable Housing Opportunities and
combat homelessness:
Fully fund the Home Investment Partnerships Program and HUD’s homeless assistance
programs, such as the Emergency Solutions Grant Program.
Capitalize the Housing Trust Fund through a revenue-neutral approach.
Preserve and strengthen the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program.
Preserve the availability of tax-exempt Private Activity Bonds which are the most
common form of financing of affordable multi-family housing projects.
The County will support legislation to foster innovation, increase efficiency, and streamline the
regulatory environment:
Promote reasonable and flexible federal oversight.
Incentivize green building and increased Energy Efficiency.
Support HUD’s ongoing transformation efforts.
Ensure that HUD releases and distributes federal funding in a timely manner.
Eliminate statutory and regulatory barriers that prevent PHAs and redevelopment
authorities from accessing federal programs they are qualified to administer.
Rail Safety – Contra Costa County is home to a substantial oil refinery industry with four refineries
located in the County. The County supports Senator Heitkamp’s Railroad Emergency Services
Preparedness, Operational Needs, and Safety Evaluation (RESPONSE) Act, S. 2547, which would
establish a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) panel focused on railroad incident
first responders. By bringing together under FEMA’s National Advisory Council all relevant
agencies, emergency responders, technical experts, and the private sector for a review of training,
resources, best practices, and unmet needs related to emergency responders to railroad hazmat
incidents, the RESPONSE Act will begin the process of addressing shortcomings in existing
emergency response practices and procedures. It will also address the effectiveness of funding
levels related to training local emergency responders for rail hazardous materials incidents.
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [LD6]: Submitted by Kara Douglas, DCD.
Formatted: Highlight
Attachment A--redlined
Page 136 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 21
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
The County also supports FEMA funding for the training of first responders, regulations that
increase tank car safety standards for cars transporting crude oil and other hazardous materials,
and regulations that require railroads to share data with state emergency managers and local
responders.
Retiree and Retiree Health Care Costs – The County operates many programs on behalf of the
federal government. While federal funding is available for on-going program operations,
including employee salaries, the allocation is usually capped, regardless of actual costs. For retiree
and retiree health care, the County’s ability to contain costs is extremely limited. The County will
advocate for full federal financial participation in funding the County’s retiree and retiree health
obligations.
Second Chance Act – The County will support funding for the Second Chance Act, which helps
counties address the growing population of individuals returning from prisons and jails. Despite
massive increases in corrections spending in states and jails nationwide, recidivism rates remain
high: half of all individuals released from state prison are re-incarcerated within three years. Here
in California, unfortunately, the recidivism rate is even higher. Yet there is reason for hope:
research shows that when individuals returning from prison or jail have access to key treatments,
education, and housing services, recidivism rates go down and the families and communities they
return to are stronger and safer.
The Second Chance Act ensures that the tax dollars on corrections are better spent, and provides a
much-needed response to the "revolving door" of people entering and leaving prison and jail.
Sexual Assault –Sexual violence affects millions of Americans – nearly every 2 minutes an
American is sexually assaulted. The County will advocate for the federal actions to insure support
for victims and survivors of sexual assault. The County will support providing funding to services
for victims of sexual violence, and encourage systemic change to aid survivors and those who
serve them. In the wake of the federal government rescinding Title IX sexual assault guidelines
that provide the framework for school investigations on campus sexual misconduct we must look
to provide alternative resources to ensure the safety of women and girls in the community.
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) – On May 23, 2012, the Department of
Justice (DOJ) announced a change in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) that
will prohibit SCAAP funds from being used to reimburse localities for foreign-born criminal aliens
housed in jails that have been classified as “unknown inmates” by the Department of Homeland
Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. This is a significant change to
the SCAAP reimbursement formula and will heavily impact counties across the nation.
The County will support the rescinding of this decision and a reinstatement of the previous
reimbursement practice, which would more equitably reimburse jurisdictions for the costs of
housing undocumented individuals, including those inmates whose status may be unknown to the
Department of Homeland Security.
Moved down [1]: State Criminal Alien Assistance Program
(SCAAP) – On May 23, 2012, the Department of Justice (DOJ)
announced a change in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program
(SCAAP) that will prohibit SCAAP funds from being used to
reimburse localities for foreign-born criminal aliens housed in jails
that have been classified as “unknown inmates” by the Department
of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) agency. This is a significant change to the SCAAP
reimbursement formula and will heavily impact counties across the
nation.¶
¶
The County will support the rescinding of this decision and a
reinstatement of the previous reimbursement practice, which would
more equitably reimburse jurisdictions for the costs of housing
undocumented individuals, including those inmates whose status
may be unknown to the Department of Homeland Security.¶
Commented [LD7]: Submitted by CCCW.
Moved (insertion) [1]
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redlined
Page 137 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 22
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – The County will advocate for the
following federal actions:
Increase SNAP benefit amounts to better meet recipients’ nutritional needs and support
local economies.
Adjust SNAP eligibility requirements to a) include currently excluded populations with
significant need b) remove time limits and work requirements for Able-Bodied Adults
Without Dependents (ABAWDS) and full-time students. ABAWDS and pertains to
adults receiving food stamps who are considered employable.
OPPOSE funding cuts or block granting the SNAP program.
Remove the current federal barriers that prevent some nutrition programs from
employing EBT technology.
SUPPORT efforts that would allow people to apply for CalFresh while incarcerated.
Streamlining Permitting for Critical Infrastructure, Economic Stimulus, and Alternative
Energy Projects –“Green” Job Creation – Request that Congress and the Administration
recognize the value of Habitat Conversation Plans (HCPs) as a reliable way of streamlining critical
infrastructure, economic stimulus, and alternative energy project permitting in a manner that is
consistent with federal environmental regulations. HCPs not only facilitate such projects through
permit streamlining, but the planning, implementation, management, and monitoring needs
associated with regional HCPs plans also create many quality “green” jobs.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Revisions – The Telecommunications Act of 1996 governs local
government’s role in telecommunications, primarily broadband cable that uses the County’s right-
of-way as well as consumer protections. As Congress works to update the Act, the County will
continue to advocate for strengthening consumer protections and local government oversight of
critical communications technologies; local access to affordable and reliable high speed broadband
infrastructures to support the local economy; the right of local municipalities and communities to
offer high-speed broadband access: coordination and integration of private communication
resources for governmental emergency communication systems; preservation of local
government’s franchise fees; preservation of the local community benefits, including but not
limited to public, education and governmental (PEG) access channels; authority for provision of
municipal telecommunication services; preservation of local police powers essential for health,
safety and welfare of the citizenry; preservation of local government ownership and control of the
local public rights-of-way; and support for ensuring that communication policy promotes
affordable services for all Americans.
The Community Broadband Act of 2007, S.1853, encourages the deployment of high speed
networks by preserving the authority of local governments to offer community broadband
infrastructure and services. The County will oppose all bills that do not address the County’s
concerns unless appropriately amended. In addition, the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) has proposed rule-making (FCC Second Report and Order Docket 05-311 “Franchising
Rules for Incumbents”) that, in the opinion of local government, goes beyond the scope of their
authority in this area. The County will oppose all such rule making efforts.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 138 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 23
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Telecommunications Issues – Support the Community Access Preservation (CAP) Act introduced
in 2009 by Wisconsin Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin. The CAP Act addresses the challenges
faced by public, educational and government (PEG) TV channels and community access television
stations. The CAP Act addresses four immediate issues facing PEG channels. The CAP Act would:
Allow PEG fees to be used for any PEG-related purpose; require PEG channels to be carried in
the same manner as local broadcast channels; require the FCC to study the effect state video
franchise laws have had on PEG; require operators in states that adopted statewide franchising to
provide support equal to the greater of the support required under the state law or the support
historically provided for PEG; and make cable television-related laws and regulations applicable
to all landline video providers.
In addition, the County should support the widespread deployment and adoption of broadband,
especially as it serves to connect the educational community and libraries.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families – The County will advocate for the following federal
actions:
Relieve states of work participation rate and work verification plan penalties for fiscal years
2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 in recognition of the serious downturn in the national economy
and the succession of more “process-based” regulations issued in the last few years.
SUPPORT policies that do not penalize work and movement towards financial stability.
Families who are working and receiving modest cash assistance grants to supplement low
earnings should not be subject to the federal time limit on assistance. Running the time
limit clock while a parent is working and receiving such supplements means both that a
family could lose assistance when it has exhausted its time-limited benefits and not be able
to receive additional assistance if the parent loses his/her job. TANF should send a strong
message to recipients that “work pays” – running the clock while a family is working
undermines this message.
Allow temporary exemptions from time limits and work requirements for families
confronting severe employment barriers - including living in an area of high unemployment
or are victims of abuse.
Permanently withdraw the August 8, 2008, proposal that would have repealed the
regulation that enables states to claim caseload reduction credit for excess MOE
expenditures.
Rescind the May 22, 2008, HHS guidance that effectively eliminated the ability of states
to offer pre-assistance programs to new TANF applicants for up to four months.
Rescind the final Deficit Reduction Act regulation restricting allowable state maintenance-
of-effort expenditures under TANF purposes 3 and 4.
End federal efforts to impose a national TANF error rate.
Attachment A--redlined
Page 139 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 24
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
Reauthorize and increase the TANF Block Grant. The allocation of the block grant has
not increased since 1997. Support funding TANF annually by an amount commensurate
with the rate of inflation to ensure that the program’s actual value does not decrease each
year.
Veterans Benefits – The County will support legislation to increase availability, accessibility, and
utilization of Veterans Benefits.
Within Contra Costa County, Veterans’ health care is provided by the VA Martinez Clinic, a
division of the VA Northern California Healthcare System. Currently, access to enrollment in the
VA healthcare system is limited to Veterans with a Service Connected disability of greater than
10%, special eligibility criteria (Purple Heart, former POW, Iraq & Afghanistan Vets within 5
years of discharge, etc.), and to Veterans with an annual gross income less than a geographically
based threshold. Currently, VA emergency services are not available after hours or during
weekends. The nearest VA emergency room is nearly 34 miles away from the VA Martinez Clinic.
The County will support legislation that would expand enrollment eligibility (such as removing
the income limit criteria) to all Veterans with an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the County
will support legislation that would establish 24 hour VA emergency services at the VA Martinez
clinic.
In addition, the County will support legislation that will improve the timeliness and quality of both
VA benefits claim decisions and VA healthcare services. Specifically, legislation that works
toward improving on the expedited processing of claims and administering of benefits to
populations with unique needs, such as homeless Veterans, Women Veterans, and Veterans
experiencing service related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Veterans Halls – The County will support legislation to provide America’s veterans organizations
with resources to make necessary repairs to or replacement of their meeting halls and facilities.
Across America, the meeting halls and posts of Veterans Service Organizations such as the
American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars serve as unofficial community centers.
Unfortunately, many of these facilities are not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act
accessibility standards, are not earthquake retrofitted, or have deteriorated in recent years due to
declining membership and reduced rental revenues as a result of the economic downturn.
The County will support legislation that would create a competitive grant program for veterans’
organizations, classified by the IRS as 501c19 non-profit organizations and comprised primarily
of past or present members of the United States Armed Forces and their family members, to use
for repairs and improvements to their existing facilities.
Volume Pricing – The National Association of Counties supports greater access for local
governments to General Services Administration (GSA) contract schedules. These schedules
provide volume pricing for state and local governments and make public sector procurement more
cost effective. However, current law does not provide full access to state and local governments
Deleted: ¶
Attachment A--redlined
Page 140 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 25
Deleted: Adopted
Deleted: 7
Deleted: November 28, 2017
for GSA schedules. The County will support legislation that gives local governments access to
these schedules and provides the option of purchasing law enforcement, security, and other related
items at favorable GSA reduced pricing.
Water Quality, Quantity and Delta Outflow – Congress may consider legislation that could
adversely affect water quality, quantity and flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the
detriment of the County residents, economy and resources. The Board of Supervisors will rely
on its adopted Delta Water Platform and its adopted resolution on Water, Ecosystem Health and
other Issues Related to the San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento –San Joaquin River Delta (No.
2012-46) to determine the appropriate response to federal legislative issues brought to the Board’s
attention.
Workforce Development – Contra Costa County supports policies that meet the needs of serving
businesses, workers, job seekers, and youth. The County further supports policies under the
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) that preserve local decision-making relative to
spending, direction of work, and other functions of local workforce boards. The County also
supports policies that promote equal employment opportunities for women and men in an effort to
increase employment and the creation of jobs in both the public and private sector and that enhance
business’ access to a qualified talent pool, and promote business growth through the development
of a skilled workforce. The County also favors policies that provide increased funding to support
job seeker services, as well as policies that make strategic investments to leverage existing funding
in the workforce development arena. The County will OPPOSE cuts to WIOA funding and
programming.
Commented [LD8]: Submitted by CCCW.
Deleted: that increase employment
Attachment A--redlined
Page 141 of 166
2018 DRAFT
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE
PLATFORM
Contra Costa County
December 11, 2017
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 142 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 2
2018 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Each year, the Board of Supervisors adopts a Federal Legislative Platform that establishes
priorities and policy positions with regard to potential federal legislation and regulation.
FEDERAL FUNDING NEEDS
The following list is a preliminary ranking in priority order. Adjustments to the priority order may be appropriate
once the President releases a budget. The current priority ranking gives preference to those projects that we know
will not be included in the President’s budget, with lower priority to Army Corps of Engineers projects which may be
in the budget. Also, Army Corps project requests will be adjusted to be consistent with Corps capability.
1. Delta LTMS-Pinole Shoal Management, CA – $4,500,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers
to continue a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for levee rehabilitation, dredging and
sediment reuse in the Delta, similar to the effort completed in the Bay area. Levee work, reuse of
dredged sediments, dredging and other activities have been difficult to accomplish due to
permitting problems and a divergence of priorities related to water quality. Significant levee
rehabilitation is critical to the long term stability of these levees and to water quality and supply
for the 23 million Californians who depend upon this water. Stakeholders from the Department
of Water Resources, Ports, Army Corps, levee reclamation districts, local governments and other
interested parties are participating in the LTMS. A Sediment or Dredged Material Management
Office will be established, and in the longer term, preparation of a Sediment Management Plan
will consider beneficial reuse of dredged materials as one potential source of sediment for levees.
(Note: $500,000 appropriated for FFY 2005; $225,000 for FFY 2006; $500,000 for FFY 2007; $462,000
for FFY 2008; $235,000 for FFY 2009; $100,000 for FFY 2010; $0 FFY 2011-2013; $930,000 FFY 2014.)
2. Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine Clean-up – $483,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers to complete
the Technical Planning Process for the clean-up project at the source and downstream area of the
Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine. The project will clean up the mine in a cost effective, environmentally-
sound manner with minimal liability exposure for the County and involving all stakeholders
through an open community-based process. The Corps initiated a Technical Planning Process in
June 2008 to develop a preliminary remediation plan, identify applicable permit and environmental
data requirements and complete a data collection and documentation program for the clean-up of
the area impacted by the Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine. Several phases of the planning process have
been completed, and this appropriation will allow the Corps to continue the planning process,
which will include looking at watershed issues downstream of the mercury mine. The mine site
is located on private property on the northeast slope of Mt. Diablo at the upper end of the Marsh
Creek watershed. (Note: $517,000 appropriated in FFY 2008. We would also like to continue our
request to expand the authority of the Corps through the Restoration of Abandoned Mines Sites (RAMS)
program to go beyond planning work and construct remediation projects. This would be accomplished
with the addition of language in a future Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill)
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 143 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 3
3. CALFED Bay Delta Reauthorization Act Levee Stability Improvement Program (LSIP) –
$8,000,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers for levee rehabilitation planning and project
implementation. The CALFED Reauthorization Act, passed in January 2004, authorized $90
million, which may be appropriated for levee rehabilitation work. The Corps has prepared a “180-
Day Report” which identifies projects and determines how these funds would be spent. Since that
time, the breakdown of CALFED, coupled with the Army Corps’ attempts to define an appropriate
and streamlined process, has delayed funding and resultant levee work. (Note: $500,000
appropriated for FFY 2006; $400,000 for FFY 2007; $4.92M for FFY 2008; $4.844M for FFY 2010.)
4. Suisun Bay Channel/New York Slough Maintenance Dredging – $8,700,000 for the Army
Corps of Engineers for maintenance dredging of this channel to the authorized depth of minus 35
feet. Continued maintenance is essential for safe transport of crude oil and other bulk materials
through the San Francisco Bay, along the Carquinez Straits and into the Sacramento/San Joaquin
Delta. Dredging for this channel section is particularly costly due to requirements on placement of
dredged materials in upland environments. An oil tanker ran aground in early 2001 due to severe
shoaling in a section of this channel, which creates a greater potential for oil spills (Note: $4.559
M appropriated for FFY 2005; $4.619M for FFY 2006; $2.82M for FFY 2007; $2.856M for FFY 2008;
$2.768M for FFY 2009; $3.819M for FFY 2010; $2.715M for FFY 2012; $2.495M for FFY 2013; $2.026M
for FFY 2014.)
5. San Pablo/Mare Island Strait/Pinole Shoal Channel Maintenance Dredging – $8,400,000
for the Army Corps of Engineers for maintenance dredging of the channel to the authorized depth
of minus 35 feet. The Pinole Shoal channel is a major arterial for vessel transport through the San
Francisco Bay region, serving oil refineries and bulk cargo which is transported as far east as
Sacramento and Stockton. (Note: $1M appropriated for FFY 2005; $2.988M for FFY 2006; $896,000
for FFY 2007; $1.696M for FFY 2008; $1.058M for FFY 2009; $2.518M for FFY 2010; $3.402M for FFY
2012; $499,000 for FFY 2013; $780,000 for FFY 2014.)
6. San Francisco to Stockton (J. F. Baldwin and Stockton Channels) Ship Channel Deepening
– $2,700,000 for the Army Corps of Engineers to continue the Deepening Project. Deepening and
minor realignment of this channel will allow for operational efficiencies for many different
industries, an increase in waterborne goods movement, reduced congestion on roadways, and air
quality benefits. This work focused on establishing economic benefit to the nation and initial
salinity modeling in the channel sections. The following steps include detailed channel design,
environmental documentation, cost analysis, additional modeling, and dredged material disposal
options. This project continues to have enormous implications for oil refineries, ports, and other
industries that depend on safe ship transport through the channel. (Note: $500,000 appropriated for
FFY 2005; $200,000 for FFY 2006; $200,000 for FFY 2007; $403,000 for FFY 2008; $1.34M for FFY
2009; $0 for FFY 2010; $0 for FFY 2011; $800,000 for FFY 2012; $1,546,900 for FFY 2013; $800,000
for FFY 2014.)
With respect to any proposed federal Infrastructure bill, the County would support legislative
language that includes infrastructure projects for all elements of stormwater: regional scale flood
protection infrastructure (usually operated by flood control districts), local scale storm drain pipes
(operated by cities and counties), storm water quality treatment facilities (operated by cities and
counties), and groundwater recharge (often operated by special districts, but also cities and
counties).
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 144 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 4
FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
The following are priority transportation projects and programs for which federal funding is needed.
1. Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project -- $18 million for improvements to a 2.5-mile
accident-prone section of Vasco Road. Project components include widening the roadway to
accommodate a concrete median barrier and shoulders on either side of the barrier, construction
of the barrier, and extension of an existing passing lane. The project will eliminate cross-median
accidents which have caused numerous fatalities in recent years, and will provide increased
opportunities for vehicles to safely pass (unsafe passing is a major cause of accidents and fatalities
on this segment of the increasingly busy two-lane undivided road). The project will include
provisions for wildlife undercrossings to preserve migration patterns. The proposed improvements
will complement a $10 million project that was funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act funds and completed in 2011.
1.b Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project Continuation -- $30 million for improvements to
the remaining 9 miles of accident-prone sections of Vasco Road. Alameda County has been
working on constructing improvements in their jurisdiction and it would be desirable for the two
counties to work together to complete the gap left in the concrete median barrier near the County
line. In addition to completing this gap, Contra Costa desires to extend the concrete median barrier
further north of the recently completed median barrier project to the Camino Diablo Road
intersection.
2. North Richmond Truck Route -- $25 million to construct a new road or other alternate access
improvements that will provide truck access between businesses and the Richmond Parkway,
moving the truck traffic away from a residential neighborhood and elementary school. This project
will increase safety, improve public health around the school and residential area by reducing
diesel particulate emissions from those areas, increase livability of the neighborhood, improve
local access to the Wildcat Creek Regional Trail, stimulate economic development in the industrial
area of the community and provide a better route for trucks traveling to and from the Richmond
Parkway. Several potential alignments have been identified, one of which was developed through
a community planning process funded through an Environmental Justice planning grant from
Caltrans.
3. Eastern Contra Costa Trail Network -- $11 million for joint planning, environmental review,
right-of-way acquisition and construction of a coordinated network of trails for walking, bicycling
and equestrian uses in eastern Contra Costa County including facilities and projects improving
access to existing or planned transit stations. Eligible trails include, but are not limited to: (1) the
Mokelumne Trail overcrossing of the State Route 4 Bypass ($6 million); (2) Contra Costa
segments of the Great California Delta Trail ($3 million); (3) a transit supportive network of East
Contra Costa trails in unincorporated County areas and the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley
and Pittsburg ($1 million); and Marsh Creek Corridor Multi-Use Path ($1 million).
4. Brentwood Intermodal Transit Center (BITC) -- Project to improve access, and advance design
and development of a transit center located in Brentwood, and serving Oakley, southeast Antioch,
Discovery Bay and Brentwood. The BITC is proposed for Highway 4 between Lone Tree Way and
Sand Creek Road and would be served initially by Tri Delta Transit. Access would be provided
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 145 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 5
via an extension of Heidorn Ranch Road, and the multimodal Mokelumne Trail. A possible future
extension of eBART from the Antioch Station would be considered later .
5. Iron Horse Corridor Enhancement Program -- $25 million for joint planning, environmental
review, and the construction of improvements in the Iron Horse Trail Corridor, a 28 mile non-
motorized facility used for commute and recreation purposes providing access to schools,
recreational facilities, commercial areas, residences, and mass transit hubs. Eligible projects
include corridor planning, trail access improvements, trail expansion/enhancements, overcrossings
(7 overcrossings in 5 cities), intersection improvements, Class I trail inter-connectivity projects,
the potential accommodation of shared/autonomous vehicles, and wayfinding/signage projects.
6. State Route 4 / Old River Bridge Study – $1,000,000 to work with San Joaquin County and the
State of California on a study of improving or replacing the Old River Bridge along State Route 4
on the Contra Costa / San Joaquin County line. The study would determine a preferred alternative
for expanding or replacing the existing bridge, which is part of State Route 4. The existing bridge
is narrow, barely allowing two vehicles to pass each other, and is aligned on a difficult angle
relative to the highway on either side, requiring motorists to make sharp turns onto and off of the
bridge. The project would improve safety and traffic flow over the bridge. (Note: no appropriations
for this project as yet.)
7. Kirker Pass Road Truck Climbing Lanes – $7 million for constructing northbound and $20
million for constructing southbound truck climbing lanes on Kirker Pass Road, a heavily used
arterial linking residential areas in eastern Contra Costa with job centers and the freeway system
in central Contra Costa. The truck climbing lanes are needed to improve traffic flow and will also
have safety benefits. The $4.5 million will close a funding gap and augment secured funding: $6
million in Measure J (local sales tax measure) funds and $2.6 million in State Transportation
Improvement Program funds. The $20 million is the total cost of the southbound truck climbing
lane segment.
8. Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector – $80 million for design, engineering and construction
of an east-west connector road between two major arterials that link Contra Costa County with
Alameda and San Joaquin Counties. The Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector will improve
traffic circulation and linkages in the southeastern portion of the County and will provide a new route
for truck traffic that will remove a significant portion of truck trips which currently pass through the
rural community of Byron. Vasco Road is designated as State Route 84, and Byron Highway is under
study as the potential alignment for future State Route 239.
Rural Road Funding Program – The County supports the creation of a new funding program that
will provide funds for converting or upgrading rural roads into more modern and safer roads that
can better handle increasing commuter traffic in growing areas, such as East County. These roads
do not often compete well in current grant programs because they do not carry as many vehicles
as roads in more congested urban or suburban areas. As a result, improvements such as widenings
(turn lanes, clear zone/recovery areas, etc.), realignments, drainage improvements and intersection
modifications often go unfunded, leaving such roads with operational and safety problems as well
as insufficient capacity.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 146 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 6
Transportation Funding for Disabled, Low-income, and Elderly Persons – Transit services for
elderly, disabled, and low-income persons are provided by the County, by some cities, by all of the
bus transit operators, and by many community organizations and non-profits that provide social
services. Increased funding is needed to provide and maintain more service vehicles, operate them
longer throughout the day, upgrade the vehicle fleet and dispatching systems, improve coordination
between public providers and community groups that also provide such services to their clients (a
need well-established by the Government Accountability Office (GAO)), expand outreach
programs to inform potential riders of the available services, and expedite deployment of efficient
new technologies and systems, among other needs. The County supports continuation and
increased funding levels for federal funding programs dedicated to transit services for these
population groups and to incentivize improvements in service delivery models to take advantage
of advances in mobile data. All of the demographic trends point to a growing need for such services
in the future. For example, the 65-and-older population in the Bay Area is projected to more than
double by the year 2030.
Surface Transportation Program/Highway Bridge Funding – The County supports the
continuation of funding levels consistent with the Highway Bridge funding program in
previous transportation funding bills that will provide funds for rehabilitating and replacing
our aging bridges. The County has several aging bridges with deficient sufficiency ratings.
Without federal transportation funding, these expensive projects would be deferred because
they often exceed the County’s funding capacity. Many of the bridges are on critical commute
corridors, goods movement corridors, inter-regional routes, and farm to market routes. Failure
of these important transportation assets can cause major disruptions to the transportation
network. The County would also support federal funding for the rehabilitation and
replacement of rail bridges.
In addition to the funding levels, the County also supports regulation changes that permit direct
funding to local jurisdictions, bypassing the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local
Assistance. The goals of these changes are to:
Get federal transportation funding into the community as soon as possible to create and
preserve jobs, both in the private sector and the public sector, in America;
Maximize purchasing power by eliminating the burdensome additional administrative
process and cost associated with multiple layers of government between funding and
construction of shovel ready improvement and maintenance projects; and
Fund the critical first and last part of each journey of goods, people, and services ‐ local
roads of America ‐ providing certainty for businesses and laying the foundation for
lasting economic growth.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 147 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 7
APPROPRIATIONS AND GRANTS – SUPPORT POSITIONS
The following support positions are listed in alphabetic order and do not reflect priority order. Please note
that new and revised positions are highlighted.
1. Buchanan Field Airport – The County approved a Master Plan for the Buchanan Field Airport in
October 2008, which included a Business Plan for project implementation; all of which completed
a previously approved Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Study. The comprehensive
planning effort has ideally positioned Buchanan Field Airport for future aviation (general aviation,
corporate aviation and commercial airline service) and aviation-related opportunities. To facilitate
the economic development potential, the Business Plan prioritizes necessary infrastructure
improvements for Buchanan Field Airport (including development of a general aviation
terminal/administration building and potential replacement of the 65 year old control tower).
Further, as the Airport is surrounded by urban residential uses, enhancing the noise program
infrastructure is deemed essential for balancing the aviation needs with those of the surrounding
communities. The Federal government, primarily through the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), provides funding for planning, analysis, and infrastructure improvements. The County will
support funding in all these areas for protection and enhancement of our aviation facility and
network.
2. Byron Airport – The Byron Airport is poised for future general and corporate aviation and aviation-
related development, but that future growth and full build out of the airport as shown in the Master
Plan is dependent upon utility and infrastructure improvements (such as improved road access and
sewer and water connections) both on and around the Airport. The Byron Airport Business Plan
prioritizes infrastructure and possible additional land acquisition to assist the Byron Airport in
fulfilling its aviation and economic development potential. The Federal government, primarily
through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provides funding for planning, analysis,
infrastructure improvements and aviation land acquisition. The County will support funding in all
these areas for protection and enhancement of our aviation facility and network.
3. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Program – Advocate/support funding
up to or above the authorized amount of $2 billion for the EECBG Program established and
authorized under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. The County’s ability
to continue offering programs/services improving energy efficiency and conservation while also
creating jobs is contingent upon additional federal funding being appropriated to the EECBG
Program in 2012 and beyond. Contra Costa and other local governments have identified and
designed many successful programs and financial incentives targeting both the private and public
sector which are now being implemented using EECBG funding authorized through the ARRA of
2009. Funding for the EECBG program is necessary to ensure the nation’s local governments can
continue their leadership in creating clean energy jobs, reducing energy consumption and curbing
greenhouse gas emissions.
4. Multimodal National Freight Network – In 2015 the primary freight network was established
pursuant to MAP-21. The County supports increases in dedicated freight funding as proposed in the
National Freight Strategic Plan. The County will pursue grants and appropriations for 1) the
Northern Waterfront Initiative – specifically, funding for a short-line railroad feasibility study for
the Northern Waterfront Corridor and a Land-Use Cost-Benefit/Fiscalization study for the Northern
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 148 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 8
Waterfront; and 2) consistent with the Draft National Freight Strategic Plan congestion reduction
strategy, projects along the I-680 corridor.
5. Regional Habitat Planning and Conservation – $85 million to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
“Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund” to keep pace with land costs and the
increasing number of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) throughout the country. The County will
support funding for the Fund to be restored to $85 million, the 2010 funding level. This will provide
much needed support to regional HCPs in California and nationally, including the East Contra Costa
County HCP. Given the prolific growth in the number of regional HCPs, the Fund needs to be
increased even more substantially in subsequent years. The East Contra Costa County HCP has
received $37.5 million from the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund in the past ten
years and continuing this grant support is of vital importance to the successful implementation of
that Plan. The County will pursue increasing appropriations to the Fund in partnership with
numerous counties in northern and southern California and will support requests of the California
Habitat Conservation Planning Coalition to increase the Fund up to $85 million.
6. San Francisco Bay Improvement Act – $1 billion restoration bill authored by Congresswoman
Jackie Speier in 2010 but not passed. The bill, if passed, will help finance restoration of more than
100,000 acres of the Bay's tidal wetlands. Funds from the bill would implement a restoration plan
that was adopted in 1993. In addition to benefits for fish and wildlife, wetlands restoration will create
new jobs and provide regional economic infusions, as well as protect against the effects of sea level
rise on the Bay's shores.
7. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area – a bill authored by Senator Dianne
Feinstein in 2010 but not passed. The bill, if passed, will authorize and fund a National Heritage Area
(NHA) for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The NHA designation would be a first step in providing
federal resources to agencies in the Delta for economic development and environmental protection.
Contra Costa County supports the legislation and participated in a feasibility study for the NHA
through our seat on the Delta Protection Commission, which completed the study in 2012.
8. Stormwater Program Funding - $2 million to fund additional compliance costs required by the Clean
Water Act. The Regional Water Quality Control Board issues the County a Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System (MS4) permit every five years, requiring the County to remove pollutants from
stormwater prior to entering the storm drain system. The County has a dedicated revenue source for
funding stormwater services derived from an assessment on every parcel in the County, which
generates about $3 million per year in the unincorporated communities. The Regional Board issued
a new MS4 permit that will increase costs dramatically over the next five years, starting with a 25%
increase and the following year by an increase of almost five times current costs. In 2012, the County
attempted to increase the parcel assessment for stormwater services but the voters turned it down. The
County needs additional funding through the Environmental Protection Agency, the source of the MS4
requirements, to help pay for compliance costs. Staff estimates the cost for compliance in 2018 at $5
million, which is $2 million more than current budget.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 149 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 9
POLICY POSITIONS
The following support positions are listed in alphabetic order and do not reflect priority order. Please note
that new and revised policy positions are highlighted.
Aging and Adult Services – Contra Costa County administers grants through the Area Agency on
Aging (AAA). Through public and nonprofit agency contracts, the AAA provides many services
annually for elderly county residents, including group (congregate) meals, rides to congregate meal
sites, nutrition education sessions, home delivered meals, legal assistance, long term care
ombudsman services, in home and respite registry services, home visiting and adult day care,
family caregiver support, assessments for fall prevention and fall prevention exercise classes. The
Older Californians Act provides Title III grants for community services and nutrition.
The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
a. OPPOSE the elimination or reduction of funding for the Older Americans Act and
Programming.
b. OPPOSE the elimination or cuts to the Elder Justice Act. The Elder Justice Act, as
part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, provides federal resources
to “prevent, detect, treat, understand, intervene in and, where appropriate, prosecute
elder abuse, neglect and exploitation.”
c. OPPOSE elimination and funding cuts to the Senior Community Service
Employment Program, which is the nation’s oldest program that helps low-income,
unemployed individuals aged 55+ years find work.
Affordable Housing and Homeless Programs – For Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s
Homeless Assistance Grants, including the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program, the
County will support funding that does not include set-asides or other requirements that limit local
communities’ ability to respond to the particular needs in their areas. For the Housing Assistance
for People with AIDS (HOPWA) program, the County will support legislation to update the
formula used to allocate HOPWA grants to reflect local housing costs as well as the number of
AIDS cases.
The County supports full funding for HUD homeless assistance programs, including the ESG
Program, and funding for full implementation of the Homeless Emergency and Rapid Transition
to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009.
The County supports funding the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Resources made
available through the Trust Fund should be accessible to local housing and community
development agencies, including public housing authorities. The Housing Trust Fund should be
used to complement and not supplant either the HOME or CDBG programs.
Agricultural Pest and Disease Control – Agriculture and native environments in Contra Costa
County continue to be threatened by a variety of invasive/exotic pests, diseases and non-native
weeds. The Federal government provides funding for research, regulation, pest exclusion
activities, survey and detection, pest management, weed control, public education and outreach.
The County will support funding in all these areas for protection of our agricultural industry and
open space. Consistent with the policy position, the County will also support legislation which
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 150 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 10
would authorize and direct the USDA to provide state and local funding for High Risk Prevention
programs (also called Pest Detection Funding).
Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials – As the beneficial reuse of dredged materials has a clear
public benefit, particularly in the Delta, the County will continue to support beneficial reuse in
general and also continue to advocate for funding for a federal study to determine the feasibility
of beneficial reuse, considering the benefits and impacts to water quality and water supply in the
Delta, navigation, flood control damage, ecosystem restoration, and recreation. The study would
include the feasibility of using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for the dredged material, for
levee maintenance and/or ecosystem restoration. Language to authorize the study was included in
the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) which was passed into law on November 8,
2007.
Broadband – Consistent with CSAC policy, Contra Costa County will support the expansion of
broadband (high speed internet service) to drive economic development and job opportunities,
support county service delivery, and improve health, education and public safety outcomes for
residents. For communities to realize these full benefits of broadband it must be capable of
supporting current technology.
Access and adoption are both necessary elements that should be supported in state and federal
legislative or regulatory proposals. This entails the following:
• Establishing and maintaining reliable broadband in unserved or underserved communities;
• Promoting the knowledge, skills and behaviors that comprise digital literacy;
• Making broadband affordable for all households;
• Maximizing funding for infrastructure; and
• Reducing infrastructure deployment barriers.
Child Care – Research continues to show that quality, affordable childcare is a necessity to
ensuring a family’s stability and economic success. Currently in Contra Costa County, there are
over 10,000 low-income children eligible for affordable childcare services, yet only 29% of that
need is met. Research also shows that in addition to a child’s long-term success with school and
employment, investing in high-quality early care and education results in a higher than average
return on investments in the areas of crime reduction and positive health, education and economic
outcomes.
With regards to childcare, the County will support efforts that ensure all children have access to
quality care by expanding high quality learning opportunities for children 0-5, including but not
limited to proposals such as:
An increase of over 100,000 new childcare slots and $12 billion over the next 10 years;
A focus on children and their families who are at or below 200% of poverty;
Financing through a new cost-sharing partnership with states, already a proven successful
model with Head Start in Contra Costa County.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 151 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 11
The County will also advocate for the following federal actions:
Increase funding to support employment of low-income families through greater access to
child care subsidies, and increase the access of children from eligible families to high-
quality care that supports positive child development outcomes.
Provide flexibility at the state and local levels so that quality care can be balanced with
access and parental choice.
Reauthorization of Head Start that includes consideration of a regional approach to
determining eligibility and reforming the Head Start Designation Renewal System by
suspending the use of the lowest 10 percent of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System
trigger.
OPPOSE block granting Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
SUPPORT new comprehensive proposals that would enhance funding and development of
early care and education infrastructure, including increasing supports, services, and
increased compensation for the early education workforce.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to home visiting programs that are designed and
implemented to support families in providing an environment that promotes healthy growth
and development of young children.
Child Support –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
Eliminate the $25 fee for non-IV-A families.
Restore the incentive match payments that were prohibited in the Deficit Reduction Act.
Allow the automatic use of cash medical support to reimburse Medicaid expenditures.
Allow IV-D agencies to access Health Insurance records for the purposes of Medical
Support.
Child Welfare and Well-being –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
Provide states with financial incentives, as opposed to monetary penalties, under the Child
and Family Services Reviews and minimize the significant administrative burden
associated with the review process.
Modify the Federal Title IV-E Foster Care eligibility income standard from the current
1996 AFDC Federal Poverty Level (100% FPL) to be in line with (and follow) the
Medicaid 138% FPL standard.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 152 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 12
Increase prevention dollars to help maintain children safely in their own homes. Federal
funding currently gives disproportional support to out-of-home care rather than to
preventing children from coming into care.
Any increase in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage should include an associated
increase in the Title IV-E matching rate to help support children in foster care.
OPPOSE The Family First Prevention Services Act for our Children, an Act that would
curtail California’s Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) efforts and would result in poor
outcomes for especially vulnerable abused and neglected children.
OPPOSE the elimination or cuts to the Social Services Block Grant and the Adoption
Assistance Program.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and
HOME Programs – The County’s ability to continue funding to a variety of nonprofit agencies
that provide critical safety net services to lower income residents, including financing the
development of affordable housing is threatened by further cuts as part of the Budget Control Act
(Act) passed by Congress in July 2011. The Act established mandatory spending caps on most
federal programs through 2021, and arranged additional across-the-board annual spending cuts to
federal defense and non-defense discretionary (NDD) programs over this same period.
Included in non-defense discretionary programs are critical local government oriented programs
including the CDBG, ESG and HOME programs. These programs are successful and productive,
leveraging significant funding from non-federal sources to help spur economic development. The
County agrees that reducing the federal deficit is an important component of achieving long-term
national economic stability, but targeting solely NDD programs like the CDBG, ESG and HOME
programs will not achieve significant reductions and will hinder the County’s ability to provide
critical services to its most vulnerable populations. The County will continue to oppose any further
reductions in the CDBG, ESG and HOME programs as part of the Budget Control Act or any other
means.
Cost Shifts to Local and State Government – Contra Costa County performs many of its services
and programs pursuant to federal direction and funding. Other services and programs are
performed at the behest of the state, which receives funding through the federal government. In
the past, the Administration’s budget has contained significant cuts to entitlement programs and/or
caps on entitlements. Such actions could shift cost of services from the federal government to the
state and/or local governments (and to the extent that costs would shift to the state, it is highly
likely that these would be passed on to the County). The County will oppose any actions that
would result in cost shifts on federal entitlement programs or which would result on greater
dependency on county funded programs. In addition, the County will support federal and state
financial assistance to aid county and local government efforts to meet unfunded federal mandates,
such as those contained in the National Response Plan (NRP), the National Infrastructure
Protection Plan (NIPP), and the National Incident Management System.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 153 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 13
Criminal Justice and Mental Health – Contra Costa County supports the Mental Health and Safe
Communities Act, which strengthens federal programs related to mental health in the criminal
justice system by enhancing the ability of families and communities to identify mental illness; and
the Comprehensive Justice and Mental Health Act, which would update the Mentally Ill Offender
and Treatment Crime Reduction Act (MIOTCRA) and facilitate collaboration among the criminal
justice, juvenile justice, mental health treatment, and substance use systems to ensure that people
with mental illnesses receive the support they need.
An increasing number of people with mental illnesses are coming into contact with the criminal
justice system—with law enforcement, courts, jails and prisons, and probation and parole
agencies—at a tremendous cost to taxpayers and public safety, as well as to these people and their
families. According to a U.S. Department of Justice report, approximately 45 percent of people in
federal prisons, 56 percent of people in state prisons, and 64 percent of people in local jails
displayed symptoms of a mental health condition.
The County will also support the mental health and criminal justice provisions in legislation that
support and expand bipartisan initiatives across the country (including the Stepping Up initiative),
such as specialized law enforcement training, mental health courts, and other collaborative
responses to people in the criminal justice system who have mental health and substance use
treatment needs. The County will also support legislation that provides resources for programs in
correctional facilities, as well as resources to improve reentry outcomes for people with mental
illnesses released from incarceration back into the community, and authorizing the creation of a
specialized National Criminal Justice and Mental Health Training and Technical Assistance
Center.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – OPPOSE legislation and administrative actions to
repeal DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) as well as legislation and administrative
efforts that target individuals due to their color, religious affiliation or national origin.
Delta Water Platform –To protect the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from various detrimental
forces that are affecting its health and resources, it is the policy of Contra Costa County to support
implementation of projects and actions that will help improve the Delta ecosystem and the
economic conditions of the Delta. Contra Costa County has adopted a Delta Water Platform to
identify and promote activities and policy positions that support the creation of a healthy
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Contra Costa County will use this Platform to guide its own actions
and advocacy in other public venues regarding the future of the Delta.
Designation of Indian Tribal Lands and Indian Gaming – The Board of Supervisors has
endorsed the California State Association of Counties’ (CSAC) policy documents regarding
development on tribal land and prerequisites to Indian gaming. These policy statements address
local government concerns for such issues as the federal government’s ability to take lands into
trust and thus remove them from local land use jurisdiction, absent the consent of the state and
the affected county; the need for tribes to be responsible for all off-reservation
impacts of their actions; and assurance that local government will be able to continue to meet
its governmental responsibilities for the health, safety, environment, infrastructure and general
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 154 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 14
welfare of all members of its communities. The County will continue to advocate for federal
legislation and regulation that supports the CSAC policy documents.
The County will also advocate for limitations on reservation shopping; tightening the definition of
Class II gaming machines; assuring protection of the environment and public health and safety;
and full mitigation of the off-reservation impacts of the trust land and its operations, including the
increased cost of services and lost revenues to the County.
The County will also advocate for greater transparency, accountability and appeal opportunities
for local government in the decision-making processes that permit the establishment of Indian
gaming facilities. This includes sequencing the processes so that the Indian Lands Determination
comes first, prior to initiation of a trust land request and associated environmental review.
The County will also consider support for federal action and/or legislation that allows Class III
gaming at the existing gaming facility only if it can be shown that any change would result in a
facility that would be unique in nature and the facility can demonstrate significant community
benefits above and beyond the costs associated with mitigating community impacts.
Economic Development Programs – Congress should fund all the complementary programs
within HUD’s community and economic development toolkit, ensuring that HUD does not lose
sight of the development component of its mission. To that end, the County will support continued
funding for the Section 108 loan guarantee program, the Brownfields Economic Development
Initiative and the Rural Housing and Economic Development program. Each of these programs
plays a unique role in building stronger, more economically viable communities, while enabling
communities to leverage external financing in a way the CDBG program alone cannot do .
Federal “Statewideness” Requirements – For many federally funded programs, there is a
“statewideness” requirement; i.e., all counties must operate the specific program under the same
rules and regulations. This can hamper the County’s ability to meet local needs, to be cost effective
and to leverage the funding of one program to reduce costs in another program. Contra Costa
County cannot negotiate for federal waivers or do things differently because it is not a state, yet
its population is greater than seven states. Recognizing this is a very long-term effort, the County
will advocate for relaxation of the “statewideness” rule to allow individual counties or a
consortium of counties to receive direct waivers from the federal government and/or adopt the
rules and regulations currently in use in another state for specific programs .
Habitat Conservation Planning – The County will advocate for elevating the profile of locally
controlled, regional Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) such as the East Contra Costa County
HCP within Congress and Administration so that these critical federal/state/local partnerships can
receive necessary attention and support. HCPs are flagship programs for the federal government
and supporting effective implementation of approved HCPs should be a top priority for the U.S.
Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and HCPs should be a key tool in
any federal climate change or economic stimulus legislation .
Habitat Conservation Permitting and Permit Alignment – The County will advocate for and
support efforts to align federal permits for natural resource impacts federal with permits already
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 155 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 15
issued by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to a locally-controlled, regional Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP), such as East Contra Costa County HCP. One good example of this is
the U.S. Army Corps’ issuance of Regional General Permit 1 which was designed to be consistent
with the East Contra Costa County HCP. The alignment of permit requirements and processes
improves the overall efficiency, predictability and effectiveness of natural resource regulation and
project delivery.
Health – The County will advocate for the following actions by the federal government: a) provide
enhanced Medicaid FMAP (the "Federal Medical Assistance Percentage" for Medicaid. It is the
federal matching rate for state Medicaid expenditures.); b) suspend the Medicare “clawback” rule;
c) suspend the “60-day rule” that requires states to repay the federal government overpayments
identified by the state prior to collection, and even in instances where the state can never collect;
d) ease the ability to cover those eligible for Medicaid by making documentation requirements less
stringent; and e) prevent the implementation of the following seven federal regulations:
Outpatient hospital
Case Management
School Based Administration & Transportation
Public Provider Cost Limit
Graduate Medical Education
Rehabilitation Services Option
Provider Tax
SUPPORT full funding of the Federal Medicaid program by the federal government. Medicaid
provides access to health care for people whose income and resources are insufficient to pay for
health care. It is jointly funded by Federal and State governments. The Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (also known as the ACA) significantly expanded both eligibility for and
federal funding of Medicaid. OPPOSE amendments to the ACA that would reduce support for
Medicaid/Medi-Cal payments to providers.
OPPOSE efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act or to replace it with any proposals that represent
significant, permanent structural alterations to current subsidized segments of the health care
system. This would include proposals that would convert Medicaid enrollee categories to a per-
capita cap model, thereby establishing hard federal funding caps for state Medicaid programs.
These proposals could force the state to make cuts of its own to offset the loss of federal funding.
Contra Costa’s entire Medi-Cal (Medicaid) population of approximately 250,000 people,
including 90,000 children, could be affected as a result.
OPPOSE new block-granting proposals, harsh cuts, or proposals that will significantly and/or
permanently shift the structure of health and human service funding and programming that would
lead to the restriction or elimination of safety-net programs. Reductions in federal human services
funding and programming severely limits critical support for our community and state. Block
grants often lead to decreases in funding that forces states to limit benefits for families, cap
enrollment, and establish waitlists. These restrictions result in families who need these supports
and services, not being able to access them, possibly leading them into deeper poverty and distress .
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 156 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 16
OPPOSE federal legislation and administrative efforts to eliminate or reduce funding for essential
public health services, inclusive of funding for immunization, HIV/Ryan White, Communicable
Disease and Tuberculosis Control, Hansen’s Disease, Teen Pregnancy, Public Health Preparedness
and Maternal Child Health Funding.
SUPPORT reauthorization of funding for HIV/Ryan White Care, Maternal Child Health Funding
including Maternal Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV), and CHIP (Children’s
Health Insurance Program).
Homeless / Runaway Youth –The County will support continued investment in the Runaway and
Homeless Youth Act to ensure that all youth have access to housing and other critical services.
Homelessness among young people is a serious issue. Homeless youth, sometimes referred to as
unaccompanied youth, are individuals who lack parental, foster or institutional care. Homeless
youth are at a higher risk for physical abuse, sexual exploitation, mental health disabilities,
substance abuse, and death. It is estimated that 5,000 unaccompanied youth die each year as a
result of assault, illness, or suicide. In Contra Costa County youth under the age of 18 years make
up approximately 11% of the homeless population and two thirds of those youth reside in shelters
on any given night.
Human Trafficking – Human Trafficking is the illegal recruitment, transportation, harboring,
provision or obtaining of people (by force, fraud or coercion), typically for the purposes of forced
labor or commercial sexual exploitation. Nearly 20.9 million people around the world fall victim
to this multi-billion dollar industry. In the past year Contra Costa partners on a Federal human
trafficking grant have served over 136 victims of human trafficking. Of those served 1,871 units
of services were provided across 22 different categories of service such as legal services, protection
and safety planning, family reunification and more. Women and girls are the predominant groups
of people that are harmed by these actions.
The County will advocate for the following federal actions to insure support and services for
victims of human trafficking, and the systems that help them:
• SUPPORT federal funding that effectively enables service providers to assist victims and
law enforcement to prosecute traffickers. Because it takes a well-resourced multi-faceted
approach to support victims and to insure traffickers are prosecuted support cross-system,
comprehensive approaches to prevent human trafficking.
• SUPPORT efforts that increase the level of training, awareness, and funding to address
promising practices related to labor trafficking (including the hospitality industry,
restaurants, etc.). Victims of trafficking may be found everywhere– some may be found
working against their will in hotels/motels for long hours for little or no pay. Labor
trafficking has been found in diverse labor settings including domestic work, restaurants,
nail salons, small businesses, large farms, and factories.
Interpersonal Violence – Interpersonal violence, often referred to as intimate partner violence,
domestic violence or battering, is a pattern of behavior used to establish power and control over
another person through fear and intimidation, often including the threat or use of violence. The
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 157 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 17
abuse can take several forms: physical, emotional, sexual, and economic as well as threats,
stalking/surveillance, isolation and intimidation. Although women are more likely to be targeted,
anyone can be a victim of interpersonal violence including those in the LGBTQ communities, men,
disabled persons, seniors, and elders. The County will advocate for the following federal actions:
OPPOSE any and all funding cuts, including but not limited to elimination of grant
programs for violence prevention, human/labor trafficking, victim services, and/or issues
related to interpersonal violence. In addition to OPPOSING any threats to cut or eliminate
Department of Justice federal grants related to the Violence Against Women Act.
SUPPORT efforts that increase access to cultural responsiveness and language support for
victims of crime.
SUPPORT efforts that promote collaboration and coordination across systems; including
the sharing of confidential or protected information in multidisciplinary team settings in
order to increase support for survivors.
SUPPORT the sustainment and implementation/practice of the Hostile Environment
Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices under the Fair Housing Act
that protects housing access for victims of harassment and survivors of domestic violence.
SUPPORT efforts to protect employment rights for survivors of interpersonal violence.
SUPPORT efforts that promote training, capacity building and deeper understanding for
students, educators and social service staff on trauma informed care, adverse childhood
experiences, healthy workplaces and schools.
Levee Restoration and Repair – The County will support legislation such as H.R. 6484, the SAFE
Levee Act (Garamendi) in 2012, which will authorize the U.S. Department of the Interior to invest
in Delta levee repairs, for all levees that are publicly owned or publicly maintained. The bill also
requires a cost-benefit analysis for the tunnel project being planned as part of the Bay-Delta
Conservation Plan.
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) - LIHEAP helps low-income
families pay their heating bills. LIHEAP is a grant that offers assistance in the form of a cash grant,
sent directly to the utility company, or a crisis grant for households in immediate danger of being
without heat. Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) enables low-income families to reduce
their energy bills by making their homes more energy efficient. Funds are used to improve the
energy performance of dwellings families in need, using the most advanced technologies and
testing procedures available in the housing industry. The County will advocate for the following
federal actions:
OPPOSE elimination and reduction in funding for the LIHEAP and WAP programs.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 158 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 18
Multi-Service Centers – The County will support federal funding for the establishment and
operation of coordinated service integration models such as SparkPoint, Service Integration
Teams, Family Resource Centers, or Family Justice Centers. Multi-service centers often co-locate
county and non-profit agencies working holistically to meet the needs of families. Centers can help
individuals and families address immediate financial crises, build financial security, address abuse
and violence, provide accessible, coordinated public services, and may, engage families in
resident-driven efforts to revitalize their communities.
Municipal Securities – The County supports efforts to preserve, enhance and streamline the
availability of tax-exempt financing to fund critical public infrastructure projects. For over 100
years, federal tax policy has granted a tax exemption on municipal bond interest to incentivize
investment in local infrastructure projects. Also, the federal government has occasionally provided
“direct subsidy bonds” that further mitigate borrowing costs to local government.
Preservation for the Tax-Exemption for Municipal Bonds: The County will support the
continued exemption of municipal bond interest.
Opposition to Repeal of the “Tower Amendment” to the Securities Acts Amendments of
1975: The Tower Amendment to the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 has prohibited
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (MSRB) from directly or indirectly regulating state and local
government issuers of municipal securities prior to the sale of those securities. The County
will oppose any repeal of the Tower Amendment which would impose an additional federal
regulatory oversight burden on local government issuers, in recognition that the states
already have such authority.
Private Activity Bonds for Government Buildings: The County will support legislation that
would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private
parties to help finance government buildings. The tax-exempt bonding mechanism would
allow state and local governments to issue private activity bonds to finance the construction
and upkeep of certain publically owned buildings. The County will support amending the
federal tax code to provide another layer of tax-exempt financing that would encourage the
use of public-private partnerships.
Pension – The County will support legislation that would modify the Internal Revenue Code and
corresponding regulations to permit public employees to make an irrevocable election between
their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula.
In 2006, Contra Costa County and the Deputy Sheriff’s Association jointly obtained state
legislation that would allow members of the Association to make a one-time irrevocable election
between their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula, called Tier C. Orange
County and its labor organizations obtained similar legislation in 2009. However, neither
County has been able to implement this state legislation because such elections currently have
negative tax consequences for employees and for retirement plans under federal tax law as
interpreted by the Internal Revenue Service.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 159 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 19
Like many local government entities nationwide, the County’s fiscal position would benefit
greatly from reduced pension costs. Allowing local government entities to implement collective
bargaining agreements and state legislation that permits employees to elect less rich pension
formulas would be a significant step in reducing pension costs.
Preservation of the federal deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT)--The County opposes
repeal of the federal income tax deduction on State and Local Taxes (SALT). Since 1913, the SALT
deduction has been a deduction available to taxpayers in recognition that the portion of income
deducted was spent on state and local public services such as public safety and transportation. In
modern history, the SALT deduction has had a strong correlation to the mortgage interest
deduction. This is because most homeowners pay property taxes on real property owned in their
State, which are subsequently deducted using the SALT deduction on federal income taxes. For
this reason, the SALT deduction can be viewed as a valuable financial benefit of homeownership.
Repeal of the SALT deduction and the corresponding reduction in financial benefit of
homeownership, could lead to a change in market prices of homes to “price in” the loss of the
SALT deduction to homeowners. In California, ad valorem property taxes, which provide general
purpose revenue to local governments, including cities and counties, is based on the assessed value
of, among other things, residential homes. Should a repeal of the SALT deduction lead to a
corresponding reduction in home values, local governments in California would be negatively
impacted by reduced home values.
Public Housing Programs – The County will support legislation that results in the transformation
of existing programs to improve their effectiveness and efficiency, in tandem with the design of
new and innovative responses, both to build upon recent progress and address outstanding issues.
The County will support legislation to protect the nation’s investment in Public Housing:
Enact affordable housing industry proposal to allow public housing agencies (PHAs)
to voluntarily convert public housing units to Section 8 project-based rental assistance
in order to preserve this vital component of the national infrastructure.
Oppose the Administration’s proposal to impose a $1 billion offset against the
operating reserves of responsible, entrepreneurial PHAs.
Support the revitalization of severely distressed public housing units.
Address safety and security concerns connected to drug-related crime.
The County will support legislation to preserve vital community and economic development
programs:
Fully fund the Community Development Block Grant Program in order to create and
save jobs, revitalize local economies, and support critical services for vulnerable
populations.
Maintain funding for HUD’s cost-effective economic development tools.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 160 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 20
The County will support legislation to strengthen and simplify the Section 8 Rental Assistance
programs:
Provide adequate funding for Housing Assistance Payment contract renewals and
ongoing administrative fees.
Enact the Section Eight Voucher Reform Act (SEVRA).
Implement overdue regulatory and administrative revisions that ensure the efficient use
of program funds.
The County will support legislation to maintain and expand Affordable Housing Opportunities and
combat homelessness:
Fully fund the Home Investment Partnerships Program and HUD’s homeless assistance
programs, such as the Emergency Solutions Grant Program.
Capitalize the Housing Trust Fund through a revenue-neutral approach.
Preserve and strengthen the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program.
Preserve the availability of tax-exempt Private Activity Bonds which are the most
common form of financing of affordable multi-family housing projects.
The County will support legislation to foster innovation, increase efficiency, and streamline the
regulatory environment:
Promote reasonable and flexible federal oversight.
Incentivize green building and increased Energy Efficiency.
Support HUD’s ongoing transformation efforts.
Ensure that HUD releases and distributes federal funding in a timely manner.
Eliminate statutory and regulatory barriers that prevent PHAs and redevelopment
authorities from accessing federal programs they are qualified to administer.
Rail Safety – Contra Costa County is home to a substantial oil refinery industry with four refineries
located in the County. The County supports Senator Heitkamp’s Railroad Emergency Services
Preparedness, Operational Needs, and Safety Evaluation (RESPONSE) Act, S. 2547, which would
establish a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) panel focused on railroad incident
first responders. By bringing together under FEMA’s National Advisory Council all relevant
agencies, emergency responders, technical experts, and the private sector for a review of training,
resources, best practices, and unmet needs related to emergency responders to railroad hazmat
incidents, the RESPONSE Act will begin the process of addressing shortcomings in existing
emergency response practices and procedures. It will also address the effectiveness of funding
levels related to training local emergency responders for rail hazardous materials incidents.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 161 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 21
The County also supports FEMA funding for the training of first responders, regulations that
increase tank car safety standards for cars transporting crude oil and other hazardous materials,
and regulations that require railroads to share data with state emergency managers and local
responders.
Retiree and Retiree Health Care Costs – The County operates many programs on behalf of the
federal government. While federal funding is available for on-going program operations,
including employee salaries, the allocation is usually capped, regardless of actual costs. For retiree
and retiree health care, the County’s ability to contain costs is extremely limited. The County will
advocate for full federal financial participation in funding the County’s retiree and retiree health
obligations.
Second Chance Act – The County will support funding for the Second Chance Act, which helps
counties address the growing population of individuals returning from prisons and jails. Despite
massive increases in corrections spending in states and jails nationwide, recidivism rates remain
high: half of all individuals released from state prison are re-incarcerated within three years. Here
in California, unfortunately, the recidivism rate is even higher. Yet there is reason for hope:
research shows that when individuals returning from prison or jail have access to key treatments,
education, and housing services, recidivism rates go down and the families and communities they
return to are stronger and safer.
The Second Chance Act ensures that the tax dollars on corrections are better spent, and provides a
much-needed response to the "revolving door" of people entering and leaving prison and jail.
Sexual Assault –Sexual violence affects millions of Americans – nearly every 2 minutes an
American is sexually assaulted. The County will advocate for the federal actions to insure support
for victims and survivors of sexual assault. The County will support providing funding to services
for victims of sexual violence, and encourage systemic change to aid survivors and those who
serve them. In the wake of the federal government rescinding Title IX sexual assault guidelines
that provide the framework for school investigations on campus sexual misconduct we must look
to provide alternative resources to ensure the safety of women and girls in the community.
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) – On May 23, 2012, the Department of
Justice (DOJ) announced a change in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) that
will prohibit SCAAP funds from being used to reimburse localities for foreign-born criminal aliens
housed in jails that have been classified as “unknown inmates” by the Department of Homeland
Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. This is a significant change to
the SCAAP reimbursement formula and will heavily impact counties across the nation.
The County will support the rescinding of this decision and a reinstatement of the previous
reimbursement practice, which would more equitably reimburse jurisdictions for the costs of
housing undocumented individuals, including those inmates whose status may be unknown to the
Department of Homeland Security.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 162 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 22
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – The County will advocate for the
following federal actions:
Increase SNAP benefit amounts to better meet recipients’ nutritional needs and support
local economies.
Adjust SNAP eligibility requirements to a) include currently excluded populations with
significant need b) remove time limits and work requirements for Able-Bodied Adults
Without Dependents (ABAWDS) and full-time students. ABAWDS and pertains to
adults receiving food stamps who are considered employable.
OPPOSE funding cuts or block granting the SNAP program.
Remove the current federal barriers that prevent some nutrition programs from
employing EBT technology.
SUPPORT efforts that would allow people to apply for CalFresh while incarcerated.
Streamlining Permitting for Critical Infrastructure, Economic Stimulus, and Alternative
Energy Projects –“Green” Job Creation – Request that Congress and the Administration
recognize the value of Habitat Conversation Plans (HCPs) as a reliable way of streamlining critical
infrastructure, economic stimulus, and alternative energy project permitting in a manner that is
consistent with federal environmental regulations. HCPs not only facilitate such projects through
permit streamlining, but the planning, implementation, management, and monitoring needs
associated with regional HCPs plans also create many quality “green” jobs.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Revisions – The Telecommunications Act of 1996 governs local
government’s role in telecommunications, primarily broadband cable that uses the County’s right-
of-way as well as consumer protections. As Congress works to update the Act, the County will
continue to advocate for strengthening consumer protections and local government oversight of
critical communications technologies; local access to affordable and reliable high speed broadband
infrastructures to support the local economy; the right of local municipalities and communities to
offer high-speed broadband access: coordination and integration of private communication
resources for governmental emergency communication systems; preservation of local
government’s franchise fees; preservation of the local community benefits, including but not
limited to public, education and governmental (PEG) access channels; authority for provision of
municipal telecommunication services; preservation of local police powers essential for health,
safety and welfare of the citizenry; preservation of local government ownership and control of the
local public rights-of-way; and support for ensuring that communication policy promotes
affordable services for all Americans.
The Community Broadband Act of 2007, S.1853, encourages the deployment of high speed
networks by preserving the authority of local governments to offer community broadband
infrastructure and services. The County will oppose all bills that do not address the County’s
concerns unless appropriately amended. In addition, the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) has proposed rule-making (FCC Second Report and Order Docket 05-311 “Franchising
Rules for Incumbents”) that, in the opinion of local government, goes beyond the scope of their
authority in this area. The County will oppose all such rule making efforts.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 163 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 23
Telecommunications Issues – Support the Community Access Preservation (CAP) Act introduced
in 2009 by Wisconsin Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin. The CAP Act addresses the challenges
faced by public, educational and government (PEG) TV channels and community access television
stations. The CAP Act addresses four immediate issues facing PEG channels. The CAP Act would:
Allow PEG fees to be used for any PEG-related purpose; require PEG channels to be carried in
the same manner as local broadcast channels; require the FCC to study the effect state video
franchise laws have had on PEG; require operators in states that adopted statewide franchising to
provide support equal to the greater of the support required under the state law or the support
historically provided for PEG; and make cable television-related laws and regulations applicable
to all landline video providers.
In addition, the County should support the widespread deployment and adoption of broadband,
especially as it serves to connect the educational community and libraries.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families – The County will advocate for the following federal
actions:
Relieve states of work participation rate and work verification plan penalties for fiscal years
2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 in recognition of the serious downturn in the national economy
and the succession of more “process-based” regulations issued in the last few years.
SUPPORT policies that do not penalize work and movement towards financial stability.
Families who are working and receiving modest cash assistance grants to supplement low
earnings should not be subject to the federal time limit on assistance. Running the time
limit clock while a parent is working and receiving such supplements means both that a
family could lose assistance when it has exhausted its time-limited benefits and not be able
to receive additional assistance if the parent loses his/her job. TANF should send a strong
message to recipients that “work pays” – running the clock while a family is working
undermines this message.
Allow temporary exemptions from time limits and work requirements for families
confronting severe employment barriers - including living in an area of high unemployment
or are victims of abuse.
Permanently withdraw the August 8, 2008, proposal that would have repealed the
regulation that enables states to claim caseload reduction credit for excess MOE
expenditures.
Rescind the May 22, 2008, HHS guidance that effectively eliminated the ability of states
to offer pre-assistance programs to new TANF applicants for up to four months.
Rescind the final Deficit Reduction Act regulation restricting allowable state maintenance-
of-effort expenditures under TANF purposes 3 and 4.
End federal efforts to impose a national TANF error rate.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 164 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 24
Reauthorize and increase the TANF Block Grant. The allocation of the block grant has
not increased since 1997. Support funding TANF annually by an amount commensurate
with the rate of inflation to ensure that the program’s actual value does not decrease each
year.
Veterans Benefits – The County will support legislation to increase availability, accessibility, and
utilization of Veterans Benefits.
Within Contra Costa County, Veterans’ health care is provided by the VA Martinez Clinic, a
division of the VA Northern California Healthcare System. Currently, access to enrollment in the
VA healthcare system is limited to Veterans with a Service Connected disability of greater than
10%, special eligibility criteria (Purple Heart, former POW, Iraq & Afghanistan Vets within 5
years of discharge, etc.), and to Veterans with an annual gross income less than a geographically
based threshold. Currently, VA emergency services are not available after hours or during
weekends. The nearest VA emergency room is nearly 34 miles away from the VA Martinez Clinic.
The County will support legislation that would expand enrollment eligibility (such as removing
the income limit criteria) to all Veterans with an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the County
will support legislation that would establish 24 hour VA emergency services at the VA Martinez
clinic.
In addition, the County will support legislation that will improve the timeliness and quality of both
VA benefits claim decisions and VA healthcare services. Specifically, legislation that works
toward improving on the expedited processing of claims and administering of benefits to
populations with unique needs, such as homeless Veterans, Women Veterans, and Veterans
experiencing service related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
Veterans Halls – The County will support legislation to provide America’s veterans organizations
with resources to make necessary repairs to or replacement of their meeting halls and facilities.
Across America, the meeting halls and posts of Veterans Service Organizations such as the
American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars serve as unofficial community centers.
Unfortunately, many of these facilities are not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act
accessibility standards, are not earthquake retrofitted, or have deteriorated in recent years due to
declining membership and reduced rental revenues as a result of the economic downturn.
The County will support legislation that would create a competitive grant program for veterans’
organizations, classified by the IRS as 501c19 non-profit organizations and comprised primarily
of past or present members of the United States Armed Forces and their family members, to use
for repairs and improvements to their existing facilities.
Volume Pricing – The National Association of Counties supports greater access for local
governments to General Services Administration (GSA) contract schedules. These schedules
provide volume pricing for state and local governments and make public sector procurement more
cost effective. However, current law does not provide full access to state and local governments
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 165 of 166
Draft 2018 Federal Platform 25
for GSA schedules. The County will support legislation that gives local governments access to
these schedules and provides the option of purchasing law enforcement, security, and other related
items at favorable GSA reduced pricing.
Water Quality, Quantity and Delta Outflow – Congress may consider legislation that could
adversely affect water quality, quantity and flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the
detriment of the County residents, economy and resources. The Board of Supervisors will rely
on its adopted Delta Water Platform and its adopted resolution on Water, Ecosystem Health and
other Issues Related to the San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento –San Joaquin River Delta (No.
2012-46) to determine the appropriate response to federal legislative issues brought to the Board’s
attention.
Workforce Development – Contra Costa County supports policies that meet the needs of serving
businesses, workers, job seekers, and youth. The County further supports policies under the
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) that preserve local decision-making relative to
spending, direction of work, and other functions of local workforce boards. The County also
supports policies that promote equal employment opportunities for women and men in an effort to
increase employment and the creation of jobs in both the public and private sector and that enhance
business’ access to a qualified talent pool, and promote business growth through the development
of a skilled workforce. The County also favors policies that provide increased funding to support
job seeker services, as well as policies that make strategic investments to leverage existing funding
in the workforce development arena. The County will OPPOSE cuts to WIOA funding and
programming.
Attachment B-- clean copy
Page 166 of 166