HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 08192024 - Equity Cte Agenda PktCONTRA COSTA COUNTY
AGENDA
Equity Committee
Supervisor Federal D. Glover, Chair
Supervisor John Gioia, Vice Chair
4931 Brighton Avenue, San Diego, CA
92107 | 190 East 4th Street, Pittsburg,
CA |
https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/826591075
72 | Call in: 1-888-278-0254 access code:
544753
9:30 AMMonday, August 19, 2024
Special Meeting
The public may attend this meeting in person at either above location . The public may also
attend this meeting remotely via Zoom or call-in.
Agenda Items: Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the
Committee.
Introductions
Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers
may be limited to two (2) minutes).
1.RECEIVE and APPROVE the Record of Action from the July 15, 2024 meeting
of the Equity Committee, with any necessary corrections.
24-2592
Equity Committee_Record of Action_7.15.24 (draft)Attachments:
2.ACCEPT report from the County Administrator’s Office on the use of gender
specific pronouns in the County Ordinance Code (the “Code”), including
recommendations on transitioning to the use of gender-neutral personal
descriptors.
24-2593
Staff Report - Pronoun Project
Attachment A - Personal Pronoun Removal Project Counts
Attachments:
Page 1 of 3
1
Equity Committee AGENDA August 19, 2024
3.RECEIVE the staff update regarding the renaming of the Labor /Trade Seat on the
Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity and PROVIDE direction to
staff as necessary.
24-2594
Equity Committee (ACEEO Labor-Trade)
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY MEMBERS
Attachments:
4.RECEIVE updates from the Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and
Social Justice
24-2595
5.RECEIVE updates on the $1M Measure X allocation for existing African
American Wellness Services
24-2596
RFQ Draft_Administer $1M for African American Wellness
Services_version2_8.16.23
Attachments:
The next meeting is currently scheduled for September 16, 2024 at 10:30am.
Adjourn
General Information
This meeting provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend a the
meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable
public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the
County to a majority of members of the Committee less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available
for public inspection at 1026 Escobar St., 2nd Floor, Martinez, during normal business hours. Staff
reports related to items on the agenda are also accessible on line at www.co.contra-costa.ca.us.
HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT:
Persons who wish to address the Committee during public comment on matters within the jurisdiction
of the Committee that are not on the agenda, or who wish to comment with respect to an item on the
agenda, may comment in person, via Zoom, or via call-in. Those participating in person should offer
comments when invited by the Committee Chair. Those participating via Zoom should indicate they
wish to speak by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. Those calling in should indicate
they wish to speak by pushing *9 on their phones.
Public comments generally will be limited to two (2) minutes per speaker. In the interest of facilitating
the business of the Board Committee, the total amount of time that a member of the public may use in
addressing the Board Committee on all agenda items is 10 minutes. Your patience is appreciated.
Public comments may also be submitted to Committee staff before the meeting by email or by
voicemail. Comments submitted by email or voicemail will be included in the record of the meeting but
will not be read or played aloud during the meeting.
Page 2 of 3
2
Equity Committee AGENDA August 19, 2024
For Additional Information Contact:
Kendra Carr, kendra.carr@oresj.cccounty.us
Peter Kim, peter.kim@oresj.cccounty.us
Page 3 of 3
3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Staff Report
1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
File #:24-2592 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:1.
EQUITY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2024
Subject: Record of Action
Submitted For: Equity Committee
Department: Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
Referral No:
Referral Name: Record of Action
Presenter: Peter Kim
Contact: Peter Kim,peter.kim@oresj.cccounty.us <mailto:peter.kim@oresj.cccounty.us>
Referral History:
County Ordinance requires that each County body keep a record of its meetings. Though the record need not be
verbatim, it must accurately reflect the agenda and the decisions made in the meetings.
Referral Update:
Attached for the Committee’s consideration is the draft Record of Action for its July 15, 2024 meeting.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
REVIEW and APPROVE the Record of Action.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
N/A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™4
Equity Committee
Record of Action for July 15, 2024
Committee Members Present: Supervisor Federal D. Glover, BOS District 5, Committee Chair;
Supervisor John Gioia, BOS District 1, Committee Vice Chair
Staff Present: Kendra Carr and Peter Kim, Co-Directors, Office of Racial Equity and Social
Justice (staff to Committee); Lara Delaney, Deputy County Administrator, County
Administrator’s Office; Ann Elliot, Director, Human Resources Department; Nicole Bilich,
Manager, Human Resources Department; Shannon Ladner-Beasley, Program Manager, Health
Department; Rhonda Smith, Assistant to Health Services Director, Health Department; Carrie
Ricci, Deputy Director, Public Works Department; Cindy Shehorn, Procurement Services
Manager, Public Works Department; Antoine Wilson, Equal Employment Opportunity Officer,
Risk Management Department; Sonia Bustamante, Chief of Staff, BOS District 1 ; Jill Ray,
District Representative, BOS District 2; Peter Myers, Deputy Chief of Staff, BOS District 3;
Alejandra Sanchez, District Representative, BOS District 4 ; Alison/Runor, Summer Interns, BOS
District 1
Public Attendees: Phil Arnold, Mariana Moore, Tonia Lediju, Y’Anad Burrell, Kerby Lynch, Jan
Warren, Liliana Gonzalez, Maria Dominguez, Roxanne Garza, Solomon Bellette, Stephanie
Taddeo
1. Introductions
Supervisor Glover convened meeting at 10:31 AM.
Committee Chairs introduced themselves, as did staff assigned to the committee, Kendra Carr
and Peter Kim, Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ).
2. Public Comment
Phil Arnold: Expressed appreciation for the progress made since 2014 when he was part of the
racial equity work via his participation in the County’s Government Alliance on Racial Equity
(GARE) efforts. Also encouraged caution as he reminded the Committee of the ways that GARE
effort fell short in meeting its goals, and implored the Committee and ORESJ to work harder to
gain trust of the Black community.
3. RECEIVE and APPROVE the Record of Action from the May 20, 2024 and June 24,
2024 meetings of the Equity Committee, with any necessary corrections.
Public Comment
No comment.
Committee received and approved both Records of Action with no corrections.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
5
4. ACCEPT report on purchasing transactions by Small Business Enterprise business
designation and an update on Small Business Enterprise outreach efforts (Carrie Ricci
and Cindy Shehorn, Public Works).
Cindy Shehorn, Procurement Services Manager for Public Works, and Carrie Ricci, Deputy
Director for Public Works Department, presented an update to the annual progress summary of
the Small Business Enterprise (SBE) Program as directed when originally presented at May 20,
2024 Equity Committee meeting. See agenda attachment.
Gioia: Expressed appreciation for this more detailed analysis and breakdown. Requested that
additional nuance in regard to both personal and professional consulting contracts, We want
same exact breakdown for both.
Staff agreed to have that for next report.
Public Comment:
No comment.
Committee accepted this report. Staff were directed to add analysis to next progress update
regarding consulting contracts.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
5. ACCEPT the resignation of Bolston Jones, Community Seat 1, on the Advisory Council
on Equal Employment Opportunity (ACEEO) and DECLARE the vacancy on the
Council. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the
ACEEO (Antoine Wilson, Equal Employment Opportunity Officer).
Antoine Wilson, Equal Employment Officer for Risk Management Department, presented an
update regarding resignation and vacancy for Advisory Council on Equal Employment
Opportunity. See agenda attachment.
Public Comment:
No comment.
Committee accepted the resignation and directed Clerk of the Board to post vacancy as
recommended.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
6. RECEIVE updates from the Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social
Justice
Kendra Carr and Peter Kim, Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
(ORESJ), presented status updates on current priorities and tasks. See agenda attachment.
6
Public Comment:
Mariana Moore: Expressed appreciation of the Co-Directors for their integrity and grace during
these first 8 months of the ORESJ and thanked them for their deep commitment to collaboration.
Committee accepted the updates from staff.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
7. RECEIVE updates on the African American Holistic Wellness and Resource Hub
Feasibility Study process.
Kendra Carr and Peter Kim, Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
(ORESJ), presented status updates on feasibility study process. This included:
• Board of Supervisors recently approved at July 9 meeting that Ceres Policy Research be
awarded the contract to conduct the feasibility study. Contract negotiations begin next
week.
• African American Holistic Wellness and Resource Hub Feasibility Study Steering
Committee has begun discussing desired short and long term outcomes, as well as
potential key performance indicators, for the wellness hub. Possible priority focus areas
include: infant mortality rates and maternal health, mental health disparities, needs of
and participation of Black males. Steering Committee members will vote on an initial list
of desired outcomes and priority areas meant that are intended to help inform and guide
the efforts of Ceres Policy Research.
Public Comment:
No comment
Committee accepted the updates from staff.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
8. RECEIVE updates on the $1M Measure X allocation for existing African American
Wellness Services
Kendra Carr and Peter Kim, Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
(ORESJ), presented status updates on $1M MX allocation. This included:
• Recent Request for Qualifications produced zero submissions. Staff recognize that the
scope of work was possibly too broad given the capacity and structure of most community
foundations. Staff is working on reducing the scope of work by taking on some of the
work internally, notably the procurement process and integration of a participatory
review committee, and restricting the role of the contractor to administer and distribute
the funds.
• Staff are meeting again with local foundations to gauge what is possible, and exploring if
any County departments can lend support and capacity around procurement.
7
• This office is prioritizing this project due to the urgent need to get these funds into the
community as soon as possible.
Gioia: Asked how to intersect this effort with the feasibility study work, leveraging what is
learned in that process to inform how to invest the $1M.
Staff explained that timing is an issue, given that the community have expressed an immediate
need for the funds to be distributed prior to the completion of the feasibility study. Also,
reminded the Committee of need to separate the Steering Committee’s oversight of the feasibility
study from the administration and award of the $1M to ensure that there are no conflicts of
interest, as well as to allow them continued freedom to advocate for community needs as
representatives of their organizations and affiliations, and potentially apply for these funds.
Public Comment:
Phil Arnold: Expressed the need to rebuild trust of the community and to invest in the healing
from past traumas, which is critical to this process. Framed his comment within the historical
implications of Port Chicago 50, Antioch Police scandal, and decades of failure to adequately
meet the needs of Black communities in Contra Costa.
Committee accepted the updates from staff.
Vote was taken – two (2) ayes. This item was passed.
9. Next Committee meeting is currently scheduled for August 19, 2024 at 10:30AM.
The August 19, 2024 meeting at 10:30AM was confirmed.
10. Adjourn
Committee meeting was adjourned at 11:19 AM
8
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Staff Report
1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
File #:24-2593 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:2.
EQUITY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2024
Subject: Gender Pronoun Project
Submitted For: Equity Committee
Department: County Administration
Referral No:
Referral Name: Gender Pronoun Project
Presenter: Timothy Ewell
Contact: Timothy Ewell,timothy.ewell@cao.cccounty.us <mailto:timothy.ewell@cao.cccounty.us>
Referral History:
Each year, the County Administrator’s Office develops a comprehensive workplan to assist in advancing
and implementing policies adopted by the Board of Supervisors (the “Board”). In 2022, the Board adopted a
plan to establish the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice and set forth a roadmap for the County and its
departments in advancing goals around diversity, equity and inclusion.
In 2023, the County Administrator’s Office completed, and the Board approved, an update to certain
areas of the Code relating to emergency preparedness and response activities as well as continuity of
government in disaster situations. Over the course of this review, several legacy terms, phrases and statutory
references required update, including references to certain department titles and classifications that no longer
exist in the County. In addition, it was observed that the use of masculine personal pronouns was prevalent
when referring to incumbents of County job functions from line to staff to executive leadership. Ultimately,
staff recommended and the Board approved updates to these sections, including conversion of masculine
pronouns to gender neutral descriptors focusing on the position or role being referenced within the Code.
In January 2024, informed by the Board’s policy direction around diversity, equity and inclusion and the
experience of updating specific areas of the Code in the previous year, the County Administrator’s Office
determined that a holistic review of the Code for the use of gender specific personal pronouns to determine if
there may be any perceived or actual gender bias should be prioritized. And, to the extent that additional gender
specific personal pronouns were identified, the County Administrator’s Office would work with the ORESJ and
the County Counsel’s Office to make recommendations to the Board for the transition of that language to
gender neutral.
Referral Update:
History of the County Ordinance Code:
The first County Ordinance Code was adopted in 1960 and subsequently was recodified following
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™9
File #:24-2593 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:2.
action by the Board on December 26,1972 with an operative date of February 1, 1973. Since that time, the
Code has been kept current through supplementation as ordinances are adopted by the Board for codification
into the Code.
The Code is organized in Titles, Divisions, Chapters, Articles and Sections, under an expandable
decimal numbering system so it can be kept up to date by separate supplements without the necessity for
recodification. The County has secured the services of the Municipal Code Corporation (“MuniCode”) to assist
with the maintenance of the County Ordinance Code.
It is important to note that in the order of actions that the Board may take - Ordinances, Resolutions and
separate orders of the Board (commonly referred to as Board Orders) - ordinances typically represent a
permanent rule of government or conduct and has the same effect as statute; however, County ordinances
cannot conflict with the Constitution or statutes of the State of California. For this reason, the County
Ordinance Code, in effect, reflects the local “law of the land” and is the highest form of policy that may be set
by the Board.
Current Approach to Gender References in the Code:
Since recodification in 1970, several areas of the Code have remained largely unchanged. The
supplementation approach discussed earlier lends itself to this for practical reasons; specifically, that the Code
shall remain permanent until such a time that the Board makes amendments to specific sections for specific
reasons. This makes maintenance of the Code more manageable as opposed to recodifying in whole over time.
Some negative issues that arise from this approach are:
1.Statutory references change and can become stale;
2.Language conventions change over the course of time.
Division 16 “Construing Provisions” of Title I “General Provisions” lays out underlying intent,
grammar and definitions related to the construction of the County Ordinance Code, generally. In 1991, the
Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 91-7 making certain changes to the definition of “Gender” within
Title I “General Provisions”; specifically, that the current approach to identifying gender identity within the
Code is defined as:
16-4.016 - Gender.
The feminine gender includes the masculine and neuter genders; and the masculine gender includes the
feminine and neuter genders.
(Ords. 91-7, 76-51 § 6, 70-36, 1457: prior code § 1303(c)).
Although this language appears to help advance a gender-neutral application of the County Ordinance
Code and may have been viewed to be satisfactory at that point in time, that change did not result in a
retrospective review and removal of gender specific pronouns that existed in the Code to that point in time.
Similarly, subsequent amendments to the Code have not used a common drafting standard to remove the use of
gender specific pronouns. It is important to note, though, that over the past 30 years since passage of Ordinance
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™10
File #:24-2593 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:2.
No. 91-7, certain areas of the Code have used various conventions that recognize both the masculine or
feminine gender pronouns, such as referring to “he/her” or “she/him” a opposed to defaulting to “he” or “him.
County Administrator Review Methodology:
The County Ordinance Code amounts to over 1,500 pages of text among the various (11) eleven Title
sections described earlier. In May 2024, following adoption of the County Budget, the County Administrator’s
Office convened a team of three (3) team members to develop a methodology and scope for reviewing the
County Ordinance Code to identify:
1.References to Gender Specific Pronouns;
2.Updates to Gender Neutral Pronouns
3.Policy Framework for Update of Department Policies and Procedures
References to Gender Specific Pronouns
At commencement, the workgroup began by defining a methodology for reviewing Code text that
ensured a comprehensive review while maintaining fidelity to the scope of the project. The largest task was
identifying a compendium of gender specific pronouns comprehensive enough to ensure a complete review.
Following research on the topic, the City of Berkeley (the “City”) had completed a similar process in
20191 and it was determined that sourcing the compendium used by the City for gender specific pronouns was
prudent resulting the search terms in Attachment A being established for use in the review process.
In applying search terms to the Code, the following methodology was applied:
1.A single Microsoft Word document for each Title section was created.
2.In each document, each of the terms in Attachment A was searched as a “whole word” to ensure that
matches generated in the document reflected the single word being searched rather than a fragment of
another word (e.g. searching “he” may generate matches for “the” if not searched as a “whole word”)
3.Exceptions:
a.One exception to the methodology in No. 2 above was searching for the word “man”, since that
term holds a gender reference in certain words, such as “workmanship” or “workmanlike”.
b.During a meeting of the Public Protection Committee, the Animal Services Department
presented certain Code provisions around spay & neuter and licensing of dogs and cats within
the County. Currently, the Code includes references to “b*tch” in reference to female dogs and
“queen” in reference to female cats. The Committee directed staff to remove those terms from
the Code and those updates have been included within the scope of this review process.
Once the review process was completed, 841 gender specific pronoun matches were discovered for
review and potential update. It is important to note that each of the (11) eleven Title sections had gender
specific pronoun matches during the review.
Updates to Gender Neutral Pronouns
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™11
File #:24-2593 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:2.
Following identification of gender specific pronoun matches, staff discussed methodology to evaluate
updates to each match. Below is the process used to make recommendations for updates to the language:
1.Delete the gender specific pronoun reference and substitute with a non-gendered descriptor. For
example, when referencing a department head, substitute “he” with “the department head”.
2.In situations where a substitution in No. 1 changes the construction of the sentence, restructure or
reword the sentence to become gender neutral.
3.If a non-gendered descriptor is not a direct replacement for a gendered pronoun and it is difficult to
restructure a sentence without materially changing its meaning, then consider using “they” or “their” in
its form as a singular pronoun in place of the gendered pronoun.
Below is an example that requires application of Nos. 1 and 2 above:
26-2.2806 Late filing.
Whenever the director of community development determines that a person has begun an illegal land
use without first applying for and obtaining all required permits or entitlements,the person he shall
apply as soon as practicable and pay a fee of one and one-half times the normal fee,but he and remains
subject to other penalties and enforcement procedures.
(Ord. 86-95 § 5).
Below is an example that requires application of No. 3 above:
82-34.602 Nonconforming use.
Upon the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, any person who claims or believes they
he or she has have established a legal nonconforming use to maintain a cabaret shall, within sixty days
of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, provide written evidence describing the
extent and scope of such use to the director of the community development department…
(Ord. 95-20 § 1).
Policy Framework for Update of Department Policies and Procedures
Following completion of the project, staff discussed the best way to ensure continued modernization of various
department level policies and procedures throughout the County, which may have references to gender specific
pronouns. Given the results of this analysis of the County Ordinance Code, it is highly likely that a significant
set of gender pronoun references exist in internal and external policies administered by line departments.
In addition to directing staff to proceed with drafting the ordinance code changes described above, today’s
action includes a request that the Equity Committee direct the County Administrator’s Office to work with the
ORESJ and the County Counsel’s Office to draft a policy mandating a transition of department policies and
procedures to use gender neutral descriptors in existing and future County policies and procedures. Once the
policy is approved it will be the responsibility of the respective Departments to update their specific policies
and procedures by a date certain, to be determined by the Board upon recommendation of the Equity
Committee.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™12
File #:24-2593 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:2.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
ACCEPT report from the County Administrator’s Office on the use of gender specific pronouns in the County
Ordinance Code (the “Code”), including recommendations on transitioning to the use of gender-neutral
personal descriptors.
DIRECT the County Administrator’s Office to work with the County Counsel to draft revisions to the County
Ordinance Code to transition the Code to the use of gender-neutral descriptors for consideration by the Board of
Supervisors.
DIRECT the County Administrator’s Office, the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORSEJ) and the
County Counsel to develop a general policy requiring the transition to gender neutral personal pronouns in the
construction of new and revision of existing Countywide or department specific policies and procedures and
return to the Equity Committee for review and further discussion.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™13
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. ACCEPT report from the County Administrator’s Office on the use of gender speciflc pronouns
in the County Ordinance Code (the “Code”), including recommendations on transitioning to the
use of gender-neutral personal descriptors.
2. DIRECT the County Administrator’s Office to work with the County Counsel to draft revisions to
the County Ordinance Code to transition the Code to the use of gender-neutral descriptors for
consideration by the Board of Supervisors.
3. DIRECT the County Administrator’s Office, the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORSEJ)
and the County Counsel to develop a general policy requiring the transition to gender neutral
personal pronouns in the construction of new and revision of existing Countywide or
department speciflc policies and procedures and return to the Equity Committee for review and
further discussion.
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the County Administrator’s Office develops a comprehensive workplan to assist
in advancing and implementing policies adopted by the Board of Supervisors (the “Board”). In 2022,
the Board adopted a plan to establish the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice and set forth a
roadmap for the County and its departments in advancing goals around diversity, equity and
inclusion.
In 2023, the County Administrator’s Office completed, and the Board approved, a n update
to certain areas of the Code relating to emergency preparedness and response activities as well as
continuity of government in disaster situations. Over the course of this review, several legacy terms,
phrases and statutory references required update, including references to certain department titles
and classiflcations that no longer exist in the County. In addition, it was observed that the use of
masculine personal pronouns was prevalent when referring to incumbents of County job functions
from line to staff to executive leadership. Ultimately, staff recommended and the Board approved
updates to these sections, including conversion of masculine pronouns to gender neutral
descriptors focusing on the position or role being referenced within the Code.
In January 2024, informed by the Board’s policy direction around diversity, equity and
inclusion and the experience of updating speciflc areas of the Code in the previous year, the County
Administrator’s Office determined that a holistic review of the Code for the use of gender speciflc
personal pronouns to determine if there may be any perceived or actual gender bias should be
prioritized. And, to the extent that additional gender speciflc personal pronouns were identifled, the
County Administrator’s Office would work with the ORESJ and the County Counsel’s Office to make
recommendations to the Board for the transition of that language to gender neutral.
History of the County Ordinance Code:
The flrst County Ordinance Code was adopted in 1960 and subsequently was recodifled
following action by the Board on December 26,1972 with an operative date of February 1, 1973.
14
Since that time, the Code has been kept current through supplementation as ordinances are
adopted by the Board for codiflcation into the Code.
The Code is organized in Titles, Divisions, Chapters, Articles and Sections, under an
expandable decimal numbering system so it can be kept up to date by separate supplements
without the necessity for recodiflcation. The County has secured the services of the Municipal
Code Corporation (“MuniCode”) to assist with the maintenance of the County Ordinance Code.
It is important to note that in the order of actions that the Board may take – Ordinances,
Resolutions and separate orders of the Board (commonly referred to as Board Orders) - ordinances
typically represent a permanent rule of government or conduct and has the same effect as statute;
however, County ordinances cannot confiict with the Constitution or statutes of the State of
California. For this reason, the County Ordinance Code, in effect, refiects the local “law of the land”
and is the highest form of policy that may be set by the Board.
Current Approach to Gender References in the Code:
Since recodiflcation in 1970, several areas of the Code have remained largely unchanged. The
supplementation approach discussed earlier lends itself to this for practical reasons; speciflcally,
that the Code shall remain permanent until such a time that the Board makes amendments to
speciflc sections for speciflc reasons. This makes maintenance of the Code more manageable as
opposed to recodifying in whole over time. Some negative issues that arise from this approach are:
1. Statutory references change and can become stale;
2. Language conventions change over the course of time.
Division 16 “Construing Provisions” of Title I “General Provisions” lays out underlying intent,
grammar and deflnitions related to the construction of the County Ordinance Code, generally. In
1991, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 91-7 making certain changes to the
deflnition of “Gender” within Title I “General Provisions”; speciflcally, that the current approach to
identifying gender identity within the Code is deflned as:
16-4.016 - Gender.
The feminine gender includes the masculine and neuter genders; and the masculine gender
includes the feminine and neuter genders.
(Ords. 91-7, 76-51 § 6, 70-36, 1457: prior code § 1303(c)).
Although this language appears to help advance a gender-neutral application of the County
Ordinance Code and may have been viewed to be satisfactory at that point in time, that change did
not result in a retrospective review and removal of gender speciflc pronouns that existed in the
Code to that point in time. Similarly, subsequent amendments to the Code have not used a
common drafting standard to remove the use of gender speciflc pronouns. It is important to note,
though, that over the past 30 years since passage of Ordinance No. 91-7, certain areas of the Code
have used various conventions that recognize both the masculine or feminine gender pronouns,
such as referring to “he/her” or “she/him” a opposed to defaulting to “he” or “him .
15
County Administrator Review Methodology:
The County Ordinance Code amounts to over 1,500 pages of text among the various (11) eleven
Title sections described earlier. In May 2024, following adoption of the County Budget, the County
Administrator’s Office convened a team of three (3) team members to develop a methodology and
scope for reviewing the County Ordinance Code to identify:
1. References to Gender Speciflc Pronouns;
2. Updates to Gender Neutral Pronouns
3. Policy Framework for Update of Department Policies and Procedures
References to Gender Specific Pronouns
At commencement, the workgroup began by deflning a methodology for reviewing Code text
that ensured a comprehensive review while maintaining fldelity to the scope of the project. The
largest task was identifying a compendium of gender speciflc pronouns comprehensive enough to
ensure a complete review.
Following research on the topic, the City of Berkeley (the “City”) had completed a similar
process in 20191 and it was determined that sourcing the compendium used by the City for gender
speciflc pronouns was prudent resulting the search terms in Attachment A being established for
use in the review process.
In applying search terms to the Code, the following methodology was applied:
1. A single Microsoft Word document for each Title section was created.
2. In each document, each of the terms in Attachment A was searched as a “whole word” to
ensure that matches generated in the document refiected the single word being searched
rather than a fragment of another word (e.g. searching “he” may generate matches for “the”
if not searched as a “whole word”)
3. Exceptions:
a. One exception to the methodology in No. 2 above was searching for the word “man”,
since that term holds a gender reference in certain words, such as “workmanship”
or “workmanlike”.
b. During a meeting of the Public Protection Committee, the Animal Services
Department presented certain Code provisions around spay & neuter and licensing
of dogs and cats within the County. Currently, the Code includes references to
“b*tch” in reference to female dogs and “queen” in reference to female cats. The
Committee directed staff to remove those terms from the Code and those updates
have been included within the scope of this review process.
Once the review process was completed, 841 gender specific pronoun matches were
discovered for review and potential update. It is important to note that each of the (11) eleven Title
sections had gender speciflc pronoun matches during the review.
1 https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/flles/documents/2019 -07-
23%20Item%20A%20Gender%20Neutral%20Language.pdf
16
Updates to Gender Neutral Pronouns
Following identiflcation of gender speciflc pronoun matches, staff discussed methodology to
evaluate updates to each match. Below is the process used to make recommendations for updates
to the language:
1. Delete the gender speciflc pronoun reference and substitute with a non-gendered
descriptor. For example, when referencing a department head, substitute “he” with “the
department head”.
2. In situations where a substitution in No. 1 changes the construction of the sentence,
restructure or reword the sentence to become gender neutral.
3. If a non-gendered descriptor is not a direct replacement for a gendered pronoun and it is
difficult to restructure a sentence without materially changing its meaning, then consider
using “they” or “their” in its form as a singular pronoun in place of the gendered pronoun.
Below is an example that requires application of Nos. 1 and 2 above:
26-2.2806 Late filing.
Whenever the director of community development determines that a person has begun an
illegal land use without first applying for and obtaining all required permits or entitlements,
the person he shall apply as soon as practicable and pay a fee of one and one -half times the
normal fee, but he and remains subject to other penalties and enforcement procedures.
(Ord. 86-95 § 5).
Below is an example that requires application of No. 3 above:
82-34.602 Nonconforming use.
Upon the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, any person who claims or
believes they he or she has have established a legal nonconforming use to maintain a cabaret
shall, within sixty days of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, provide
written evidence describing the extent and scope of such use to the director of the community
development department…
(Ord. 95-20 § 1).
Policy Framework for Update of Department Policies and Procedures
Following completion of the project, staff discussed the best way to ensure continued
modernization of various department level policies and procedures throughout the County, which
may have references to gender speciflc pronouns. Given the results of this analysis of the County
Ordinance Code, it is highly likely that a signiflcant set of gender pronoun references exist in
internal and external policies administered by line departments.
17
In addition to directing staff to proceed with drafting the ordinance code changes described
above, today’s action includes a request that the Equity Committee direct the County
Administrator’s Office to work with the ORESJ and the County Counsel’s Office to draft a policy
mandating a transition of department policies and procedures to use gender neutral descriptors in
existing and future County policies and procedures. Once the policy is approved it will be the
responsibility of the respective Departments to update their speciflc policies and procedures by a
date certain, to be determined by the Board upon recommendation of the Equity Committee.
18
Contra Costa County
Gender Specific Personal Pronoun References, by County Ordinance Code Title as of 8/13/2024
Pronoun/Term Title 1 Title 2 Title 3 Title 4 Title 5 Title 6 Title 7 Title 8 Title 9 Title 10 Title 11 Code Total:
he 3 12 1 58 40 15 20 42 8 9 19 227
him 1 3 0 11 11 7 0 4 3 1 1 42
his 6 18 5 90 83 39 27 23 22 24 15 352
she 2 3 0 31 2 3 3 3 1 0 0 48
her 1 7 0 45 40 0 8 11 8 6 3 129
hers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
male 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4
female 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 6
man 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
woman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
men 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
women 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
himself 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 12
herself 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
"-man-"0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 3 5 2 16
Total 13 44 6 244 183 64 62 90 46 48 41 841
Notes:"b*tch"
"workmanlike"
"workmanship" "man-made""man-made" "workmanship" "man-made" "chairman"
19
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Staff Report
1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
File #:24-2594 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:3.
EQUITY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2024
Subject: Labor/Trade Seat on the Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity
Submitted For: Equity Committee
Department: Equal Employment Officer
Referral No:
Referral Name: Labor/Trade Seat on the Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity
Presenter: Antoine Wilson
Contact: Antoine Wilson,antoine.wilson@riskm.cccounty.us <mailto:antoine.wilson@riskm.cccounty.us>
Referral History:
The Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity (ACEEO) reviews the County’s Equal Employment
Opportunity Program and recommends actions to help achieve the County’s goals for equal employment
opportunities. The Council is composed of thirteen (13) members appointed by the Board of Supervisors based
on recommendations from the Equity Committee. The composition of the Advisory Council includes:
·Four (4) representatives from the Community.
·Two (2) representatives from Employee Organizations.
·Two (2) representatives from County Management.
·One (1) representative from Education.
·One (1) representative from the Business Community.
·One (1) representative from Labor/Trade.
·One (1) representative from the Disabled Community.
·One (1) representative from the Veterans Community.
Referral Update:
It has been increasingly difficult to find interested candidates to fill this seat. The last time it was filled was in
2022, with the seat being vacated on July 21, 2022. Despite ongoing efforts, filling this seat has been
challenging and has prevented the ACEEO from having full membership. Outreach efforts have included
contacting labor organizations, collaborating with the district offices to directly engage with local labor
representatives, and reaching out to employees and other contacts within the County, all to no avail.
The (ACEEO) reviewed the history of the Labor/Trade Seat and, in an effort to generate more interest and
complete the enrollment of the Council, decided it was in the best interest of the committee to suggest renaming
the seat. The proposed new name is "Business Seat 2."
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
RECEIVE the staff update regarding the renaming of the Labor/Trade Seat on the Advisory Council on Equal
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™20
File #:24-2594 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:3.
Employment Opportunity and PROVIDE direction to staff as necessary.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
N/A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™21
ADVISORY COUNCIL
ON EEO (ACEEO)
LABOR/TRADE SEAT
22
ACEEO
HISTORY
The ACEEO was established in 1991.
ACEEO by-laws adopted December 4, 1992.
Reviews the County’s Equal Employment
Opportunity Program.
Recommends actions to help achieve the
County’s goals for equal employment
opportunities.
23
ACEEO ACTIVE
SEATS
Four (4)
representatives
from the
Community.
Two (2)
representatives
from Employee
Organizations.
Two (2)
representatives
from County
Management.
One (1)
representative
from Education.
One (1)
representative
from the Business
Community.
One (1)
representative
from Labor/Trade.
One (1)
representative
from the Disabled
Community.
One (1)
representative
from the Veterans
Community.
24
The Labor/Trade Seat represents labor agencies
involved in training (apprenticeship and vocational
training).
Between August 2018 and August 2024, the
Labor/Trade Seat was filled once.
The seat was vacated in July 2022. The seat was
held for a little less than 2 years.
Despite ongoing efforts, filling this seat has been
challenging.
It has prevented the ACEEO from having full
membership.
Outreach efforts have included the following:
•Contacting the labor/trade organizations
•Collaborating with the district offices to directly
engage with local labor representatives.
•Reaching out to employees and other contacts
within the County
25
County EEO Advisory Board Seat Makeup/Matrix
Alameda Human Relations
Commission
Comprised of 16 members
Chairperson
1st/2nd Vice Chairperson
Secretary/Treasurer
Member At-Large
Marin Equal Employment Advisory Committee Comprised of 7 members
2 Labor representatives
1 Women’s Commission
1 Human Rights Commission
1 Workforce Investment Board
2 At-Large appointees
Santa Clara Commission on
Equal Access and
Employment Opportunity
Comprised of 7 members
5 Supervisorial District appointees
2 Member At-Large appointees
Santa Cruz Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
Comprised of 10 members
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
Member At-Large
26
County EEO Advisory Board Seat Makeup/Matrix
Sacramento Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory
Committee
Comprised of 15 members
7 citizen members
4 department heads
4 employee organizations
San Joaquin Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory
Committee
Comprised of 9 members
1 Management
1 Employee
7 Community
San Mateo Equal Employment
Opportunity Advisory Committee
Comprised of 15 members
1 Commission on the Status of Women
1 Civil Service Commission
1 Commission on Disabilities
12 At-Large appointees
27
Renaming of the Labor/Trade Seat to Business Seat #2
•Reviewed and discussed the committee’s historical data.
•Determined that the Labor/Trade seat should be renamed to "Business Seat #2."
•Attract interested parties who can contribute to shaping the direction of the ACEEO.
•Intended to honor and recognize the role of small businesses in the County.
28
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY MEMBERS
LABOR-TRADE MEMBER SEAT
(VACANT)
Appointed:
Expires: November 30, 2026
BUSINESS MEMBER SEAT
DeVonn Powers
Appointed: May 22, 2024
Expires: November 30, 2026
COMMUNITY MEMBER SEAT #1
Bolston Jones
Appointed: October 17, 2023
Expires: November 30, 2026
EDUCATION MEMBER SEAT
Roosevelt Gipson, Jr
Appointed: December 1, 2022
Expires: November 30, 2025
COMMUNITY MEMBER SEAT #2
Lauren Traylor
Appointed: May 22, 2024
Expires: November 30, 2026
DISABILITY SEAT
Nikki Lopez
Appointed: May 22, 2024
Expires: November 30, 2026
COMMUNITY MEMBER SEAT #3
Eric Maldonado
Appointed: December 1, 2022
Expires: November 30, 2025
UNION MEMBER SEAT #1
Fabiola Quintero
Appointed: April 12, 2022
Expires: November 30, 2024
COMMUNITY MEMBER SEAT #4
Lynette Hart
Appointed: May 22, 2024
Expires: November 30, 2026
UNION MEMBER SEAT #2
(VACANT)
Appointed:
Expires: November 30, 2025
MANAGEMENT MEMBER SEAT #1
Lara DeLaney
Appointed: December 1, 2022
Expires: November 30, 2025
VETERAN’S SEAT
Leonard Ramirez
Appointed: April 12, 2022
Expires: November 30, 2024
MANAGEMENT MEMBER SEAT #2
Amrita Kaur
Appointed: October 12, 2021
Expires: November 30, 2024
STAFF TO ACEEO
Antoine Wilson
Equal Employment Opportunity Officer
2530 Arnold Drive #140
(925) 335-1455
Email
Antoine.Wilson@riskm.cccounty.us
Kiara Allen
Clerk-Senior Level
(925) 335-1417
29
Email Kiara.Allen@riskm.cccounty.us
30
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Staff Report
1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
File #:24-2595 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:4.
EQUITY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2024
Subject: ORESJ Updates
Submitted For: Equity Committee
Department: Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ)
Referral No:
Referral Name: ORESJ Updates
Presenter: Kendra Carr
Contact: Kendra Carr,kendra.carr@oresj.cccounty.us <mailto:kendra.carr@oresj.cccounty.us>
Referral History:
At the January 22, 2024 Equity Committee meeting and January 30, 2024 Annual Board Retreat, the ORESJ Co
-Directors provided an update regarding the 2024 office priorities, recruiting strategy and work plan for the
second hiring phase for the ORESJ, and presented a proposal for the structure of the Lived Experience
Advisory Board.
Subsequently, the ORESJ Co-Directors have presented updates to the Equity Committee on various initiative
Referral Update:
The ORESJ CO-Directors will present hiring status updates for the Equity Analyst roles.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
RECEIVE updates from the Co-Directors of the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice and PROVIDE
direction on next steps
Fiscal Impact (if any):
N/A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™31
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Staff Report
1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
File #:24-2596 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:5.
EQUITY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2024
Subject: $1M Measure X allocation for existing African American Wellness Services
Submitted For: Equity Committee
Department: Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
Referral No:
Referral Name: $1M Measure X allocation for existing African American Wellness Services
Presenter: Peter Kim
Contact: Peter Kim,peter.kim@oresj.cccounty.us <mailto:peter.kim@oresj.cccounty.us>
Referral History:
On December 12, 2023, the Board of Supervisors, at the recommendation of the Measure X Community
Advisory Board, voted to allocate $1,000,000 of Measure X funds for existing African American Wellness
Services. The ORESJ was tasked with developing a plan to administer the funds. The plan was presented at
Equity Committee meetings from February 2024 to April 2024, and included the following:
-Partner with a local community foundation with extensive experience supporting Black-led and Black-
serving organizations to serve as a contracted agency tasked with overseeing and carrying out
procurement, selection, and fund distribution responsibilities, which will include a community and
resident participatory process that includes review of applications and recommendation of awardees (for
Board of Supervisors approval), as well as monitoring of progress and assessing outcomes.
-Release the funding in two annual phases:
o $500,000 in phase 1 (July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025)
o $500,000 in phase 2 (July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026)
-While applications for funds will be accepted for all of Contra Costa County, programs and initiatives
serving East County’s most impacted communities will be prioritized.
-These awards are expected to augment and/or expand existing services or programs by increasing
capacity (e.g. serve more participants, host additional events, extend program periods).
-Based on MXCAB key areas of need, community input, and existing research data, the proposed
service/program categories to be prioritized are:
o Mental health supports
o Food insecurity services
o Re-entry support services
o Youth development support/services
o Violence prevention/intervention services
o Community healing, particularly from trauma due to police violence
At the April 15, 2024 Equity Committee meeting, Supervisors, ORESJ and CAO staff discussed the need to
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™32
File #:24-2596 Agenda Date:8/19/2024 Agenda #:5.
solicit a partnership via an abbreviated Request for Qualifications. The RFQ was released and closed in June
2024. No proposals were received in response to the RFQ released to solicit the partnership of a community
foundation. The ORESJ Co-Directors are exploring internal ORESJ/County capacity to administer the funds.
Referral Update:
Upon further discussion with community foundations, the ORESJ Co-Directors learned that the scope of work
was too large for any community foundation to commit to administering the Measure X funds. The ORESJ Co-
Directors subsequently revised the RFQ, and will take on many of the original tasks outlined in the first RFQ.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
RECEIVE the update and PROVIDE direction on next steps.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
N/A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 8/14/2024Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™33
Contra Costa County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) # XXXX-XXX
Administer the management and monitoring of service contracts
to increase African-American holistic wellness and support.
The Contra Costa County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ) is pleased to
announce the solicitation of qualifications from applicants to administer the management
and monitoring of service contracts to increase African -American holistic wellness and
support in Contra Costa County for the period of December 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027.
The RFQ is a process by which the ORESJ solicits qualifications from Responders who may
be selected to enter into a contract for the provision of these kinds of services.
Please read this entire packet carefully
Final submissions will be due to the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ)
via BidSync by October 16, 2024 at 5:00pm.
A Bidder’s Information Session will be held via Zoom on Wednesday, September 25,
from 1:30-3:00pm. Zoom link will be shared via BidSync to all who are registered in
BidSync as potential applicants.
Written questions about the RFQ can be submitted on BidSync by 5:00pm on October 2,
2024. All those registered in BidSync will receive the written responses to those
questions.
Thank you in advance for your efforts in preparing your response!
RELEASE DATE: September 11, 2024
Statement of Qualifications Due Date: October 16, 2024
NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. PDT
34
2
Summary
The Contra Costa County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (County) is seeking
Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) from qualified applicants that can administer the
management and monitoring of multiple service contracts totaling up to $1 million over
two years towards African-American holistic wellness and support services and/or
programs. The County welcomes responses from all qualified community non-profit
foundations, philanthropic organizations, and grant -making bodies in good standing with
the California Secretary of State and Franchise Tax Board. The County may, in its sole
discretion, enter into a contract with a qualified provider or may reject all proposals and
not award a contract at this time.
1. SOQ Submittal Process
SOQs must be submitted electronically through the BidSync/Periscope 2SG website. Late
submittals will not be accepted. No changes or additions to the SOQ may be made after
the submittal date.
Incomplete SOQs or SOQs that do not conform to the requirements specified in Section
III herein will not be considered.
Addenda: Any changes to these documents will be issued in writing via Addenda to be
posted on BidSync/Periscope S2G website.
Questions: All questions regarding the RFQ will be accepted through the
BidSync/Periscope 2SG website only. The deadline for submitting questions is October
2, 2024 no later than 5:00 p.m. Questions will be answered and disseminated to those
registered on the BidSync/Periscope 2SG website.
Correspondence: As of the issuance of this RFQ, firms are specifically directed not to
contact County personnel for meetings, conferences, or technical discussions related to
this RFQ. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disqualification of the firm.
Please contact customer support if you need technical assistance with any part of the bid
process at S2G@periscopeholdings.com or call (800) 990-9339.
2. SOQ Evaluation Process
SOQs will be evaluated by a Selection Committee. The County will notify firms that will
be considered for further evaluation and negotiation. Firms notified may be invited to
interview. If so, interviews will be ½ hour.
See Section IV for additional information.
35
3
3. Funding
Up to $1,000,000 (one million dollars) is appropriated in the FY 23-24 County Budget,
from an allocation of Measure X revenues, to expand the provision of existing
community-based services that promote African American wellness in Contra Costa
County. Contractor will be able to allocate up to 12% of total funds , or $120,000, to go
toward indirect and administrative costs.
For a full description of the purpose and background, see Section I: Introduction. For a
full description of required activities and expected goals, see Section II: Scope of Work.
4. Calendar of Events
Below is a schedule overview of the SOQ submittal process due dates, and evaluation
and selection process:
EVENT DATE
RFQ Release Date September 11, 2024
Bidder’s Information Session September 25, 2024
RFQ Questions Deadline October 2, 2024
Submittal Deadline October 16, 2024
Review/ Evaluation October 17-25, 2024
Interviews (only if needed) October 23-24, 2024
Selection Notification October 28, 2024
Review by Equity Committee November 4, 2024
Request Approval from Board November 12, 2024
Contract Negotiation and Routing November 13-27, 2024
Contract Start Date December 1, 2024
36
4
Table of Contents
Section I: Introduction ............................................................................................................. page 5
Section II: Scope of Services .................................................................................................. page 8
Section III: Evaluation and Selection Process ............................................................. page 10
Section IV: Instructions to Responders .......................................................................... page 14
Section V: Contract Information and Requirements .............................................. page 17
Exhibits
Exhibit A – Statement of Qualification ............................................................................... page 19
Exhibit B – Client References ................................................................................................. page 23
Exhibit C – Anti-Collusion Statement ................................................................................. page 24
Exhibit D – Contra Costa County Business Opportunity Registration ................. page 25
Exhibit E – Addenda Acknowledgement ........................................................................... page 26
Attachments
Attachment A – General Conditions (Purchase of Services – Long Form) ......... page 27
37
5
Section I: Introduction
A. Purpose
The Contra Costa County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ) is issuing a
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) #XXXX-XXX to solicit the services of an experienced
community foundation or similarly qualified applicant to collaborate with ORESJ to
administer the management and monitoring of service contracts towards African -American
holistic wellness and support. Based on the response to this solicitation, the ORESJ plans to
contract with a successful bidder for the period of December 1, 2024 to March 31, 2027 for
services described in this RFQ.
In collaboration with ORESJ, the successful bidder will administer a two-year grant
opportunity for community organizations engaged in meeting the urgent needs of African
Americans in Contra Costa County and providing holistic wellness support services. ORESJ
seeks to pilot a funding model that bridges and marries County procurement and
contracting processes that prioritize fiscal accountability and demonstrable outcomes with
creative, flexible, and visionary funding approaches of Bay Area-based, community-
centered philanthropy. This project is an effort to explore and test innovative partnerships
between County and philanthropic organizations that center racial equity, strengthen the
capacity of local direct-service community-based organizations, and prioritize the needs of
vulnerable, marginalized communities in Contra Costa County.
For a full description of required activities and expected goals, see Section II: Scope of
Work.
The total funding available under this solicitation is $1,000,000.
Bidders with experience and proven success in providing services as described in this
solicitation are invited to submit responses. If you are interested in and capable of
providing the requested services by contract with the County, please carefully review this
entire RFQ and submit your response as directed in the “Instructions to Responders”
section of this solicitation. This solicitation is not in any way to be construed as an
agreement, obligation, or contract between the County and any party submitting a
response, nor will the County pay for any costs associated with the preparation of any
response.
B. Background
Currently, in Contra Costa County, African Americans represent approximately 8.7% of the
population. Racism, inequity, injustice, disparities and harm exist throughout the United
States and, unfortunately, here in Contra Costa County as well. In Contra Costa County,
African American residents experience disproportionate rates of preven table chronic
illnesses such as heart disease, obesity, cancer as well as most recently, COVID -19. Racial
and ethnic disparities in health outcomes, the criminal justice system, educational
38
6
achievement, and social service metrics are present in Contra Costa County. These
disparities have been well-documented in reports issued by the Contra Costa Racial Justice
Task Force/Oversight Body, First Five Contra Costa, Kaiser Permanente, Contra Costa
Health Services, Contra Costa Continuum of Care, Contra Costa Employment and Human
Services Department, and others. For the last several years, members of the community
have been advocating and leading the effort in the County for the creation of an African
American Holistic Wellness and Resource Hub and the urgent need for expanded support
services that address the pain, trauma, and other related challenges that exist in under-
resourced, under-served African American communities. Recent advocacy efforts were
launched in part by evidentiary findings of the racist and sexist actions of officers within
the Antioch and Pittsburg Police Departments. The findings have led to the direct
involvement of the County District Attorney, the County Public Defender, the State Attorney
General, the FBI, and the Department of Justice.
The high-level mission and vision for the African American Holistic Wellness and Resource
Hub, as expressed through public comment made to the Board of Supervisors, is to host
and provide culturally-relevant and responsive services to eliminate health and wellness
disparities. As a result of services provided through the African American Holistic Wellness
and Resource Hub, African American community members in Contra Costa County will
experience greater safety, connection and belonging, and have greater acc ess to health,
mental health and other support services that meet their immediate needs.
Feasibility Study: Measure X Funding
Brief History of Measure X
On November 3, 2020, Contra Costa County voters approved a countywide 20 -year, ½ cent
sales tax increase known as Measure X. The ballot measure stated that the intent of
Measure X is “to keep Contra Costa’s regional hospital open and staffed; fund communit y
health centers, emergency response; support crucial safety -net services; invest in early
childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other essential county
services.” Collection of the tax began on April 1, 2021.
On February 2, 2021, the Board of Supervisors established a Measure X Community
Advisory Board (MXCAB), and from May through August 2021, the MXCAB conducted a
community needs assessment process to review and account for current community needs,
strengths, and resources, and to identify potential strategies to address those needs, as the
basis for making funding recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The Advisory
Board determined five overarching key areas of need for Contra Costa County
communities: (1) Support for mental well-being (prevention, crisis response); (2) Increase
equity and removal of structural barriers; (3) Ensure equitable access to health care,
housing, childcare, income opportunities, and food; (4) Strengthen supports for residents
of all generations; and (5) Creating communities where all residents feel safe and welcome.
39
7
On October 12, 2021, the Board of Supervisors received the MXCAB’s report recommending
funding priorities for Measure X funding allocations. For additional information on all
recommended strategies, see the Measure X Community Advisory Board report to the
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and presentation for the October 12, 2021 Board
of Supervisors meeting.
Measure X Allocations to Support African American Holistic Wellness
Upon receipt of the Measure X Community Advisory Board’s FY 23 -24 prioritized funding
recommendations, on December 12, 2023, the Board of Supervisors directed that a one -time
allocation of $1,000,000 of Measure X funds be allocated for the purpose of suppor ting the
“African American Holistic Wellness and Resource Hub and existing services” in Contra Costa
County. These funds were allocated as an immediate, intermediary step to what is expected
to be an increased, long -term investment in Black communities’ overall well-being and
holistic health through the establishment of an African American Holistic Wellness and
Resource Hub (Hub). The activities supported through this funding will help inform the
possibilities for what will become housed within the Hub. It is this allocation of funds that
will fund the work outlined and described in this Request for Qualifications.
Most recently, on April 23, 2024, the Board of Supervisors allocated an additional $7.5
million of Measure X funds towards the establishment and operation of an African
American Holistic Wellness and Resource Hub and implementation of services and
activities. The outcomes and lessons learned from the service activities described in this
RFQ, along with a separate feasibility study that is currently underway, will inform the
Board of Supervisors on how to allocate and apply these funds.
40
8
Section II: Scope of Services
The County seeks to contract with an eligible contractor with extensive expertise in
supporting local Black-led and Black community-serving organizations to administer,
manage and monitor service contracts aimed at increasing and strengthening African-
American holistic wellness in Contra Costa County.
In order to be considered for selection, bidders must demonstrate capacity, cultural
competency, commitment, and experience in working in deep partnership with service
providers and community organizations embedded in, representative of, and dedicated to
serving marginalized, vulnerable communities, and specifically impacted African American
communities in Contra Costa County.
Additionally, bidders must have the capability and experience to perform the following
scope of services. Organizations that would like to submit an SOQ but cannot perform all
required services are encouraged to partner with sub-consultants to have a team that
would complement/supplement their capabilities.
Distribution of Funds
The release of funds and funding of service contracts will occur in two annual phases:
▪ $500,000 in phase 1 (January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2025)
▪ $500,000 in phase 2 (January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026)
ORESJ will administer and coordinate the procurement process, including a competitive
solicitation of proposals, review and scoring of proposals, synthesizing scores into final
recommendations, and presenting recommendations to Board of Supervisors for their final
approval.
These awards are expected to augment and/or expand existing services or programs by
increasing capacity (e.g. serve more participants, host additional events, extend program
periods). They are not expected to initiate new programs , hire entire new staff teams, etc.
Based on MXCAB key areas of need, African American Holistic Wellness and Resources Hub
Feasibility Study Steering Committee input, community feedback, and existing research
data, potential service/program categories to be prioritized are:
▪ Mental health supports
▪ Food insecurity services
▪ Housing insecurity
▪ Maternal and infant health
▪ Re-entry support services
▪ Youth development support/services
▪ Violence prevention/intervention services
▪ Community healing, particularly from trauma due to police violence
41
9
While applications for funds will be accepted for services/programming targeting African
American communities of any region of Contra Costa County, services/programming
serving East County’s most impacted communities will be prioritized.
Scope of Services
After final determination and approval of funding awards is made by the Board of
Supervisors, Contractor is responsible for administering contracts with the Board -
approved cohort of awardees, which includes the following activities:
I. Administer a two-year grant program for community-based non-profit organizations
to meet the urgent needs of African Americans in Contra Costa County by providing
holistic wellness support services that consists of fair and transparent contracting
requirements.
II. Oversee contracting process with County-approved grantees, including drafting of
contracts, contract negotiations with grantees, and assembling grantee cohort for
orientation and kickoff event.
III. Establish invoicing and payment process ; distribute regular and timely payments to
grantees.
IV. Monitor program activities and progress that tracks people served, milestones
achieved, and deliverables met; produce an annual summary report of these
outcomes.
V. In partnership with ORESJ, nurture a culture of learning, collaboration, and
coordinated service delivery among the grantee cohort throughout contract period.
This can include grantee convenings, coordinated site visits, strategic thought
partnership, connection to resources and other supports, and/or additional training
and capacity building opportunities.
VI. In partnership with ORESJ, assess if grantees were successful at end of year one, and
determine if any changes to program design, goals, timeline, budget, and/or any other
relevant conditions within the current service delivery, model and /or contract are
needed.
VII. In partnership with ORESJ, produce a summary report at the end of year 1 and year 2
that outlines observations, lessons learned, and recommendations written in clear,
concise plain language that is accessible to all Contra Costa community members.
Contractor will be able to allocate up to 12% of total funds, or $120,000, to go toward
indirect and administrative costs.
42
10
Section III: Instructions to Responders
Respondents shall submit Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) Narratives that are concise and
specifically responds to all requested services as posted in this RFQ. Each SOQ shall include
the following format, content, and attachments. SOQs that do not conform to the
requirements specified below will not be considered.
A. Format
1. Cover Letter – Signed in blue ink by an authorized representative of the firm
2. Title/Cover Page with Table of Contents
3. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) Narrative – within a maximum of 10 pages (12-
point font, 1” margins, consecutively numbered pages), not including
attachments/exhibits, describe your organization’s experience, capacity, and
expertise as they relate to the scope of services described in this RFQ, using the same
section titles and in the following order:
• Organizational History and Overview (2-3 pages): Briefly describe your
organization’s vision, mission, and strategic goals. Include a summary of your
priority areas of investment (e.g. geographic focus, service categories, etc.),
current portfolio of grantees, years in operation, size of organization.
• Scope of Services Understanding and Experience (3-4 pages): Describe the
organization’s understanding, knowledge, and experience working in
partnership and supporting Black-led, Black community-serving grassroots
organizations. Describe your organization’s expertise in grantmaking, including
the administration and manag ement of grant contracts, relationship- and
capacity-building with grantees. Describe similar projects/initiatives completed.
If applicable, indicate the availability of additional funds or resources that can be
leveraged to supplement or augment the work described in the scope of services.
• Team Member Qualifications (2-3 pages): Identify the team member(s) for this
project, including roles and duties as related to this project. Provide an
Organizational Chart of key team members, including subcontractors; and
describe team members’ lived experiences related to the scope of work, their
qualifications, experience level, and expertise of each key team member ,
including:
• Team Leadership/Project Manager
• Indicate who is authorized to negotiate contract terms on behalf of
your organization
• If different, indicate who is the primary point -of-contact who will
manage and oversee implementation of project
• Areas of specialization of each key team member
43
11
• Related projects key team members have worked on , and other
relevant experience that speaks to their expertise on this project
• Submit resumes for all key team members who will be working directly
on this project (these will not count towards page limit; see below in
Attachments)
• Acknowledgement of the Standard Contract Conditions : In a sentence at the end
of your SOQ Narrative, acknowledge that you have read and accept the County
standard services agreement language in “General Conditions (Purchases of
Services – Long Form)”, including indemnification and insurance requirements,
which is included as Attachment A.
4. Attachments
• Statement of Qualification (SOQ) Form (see Exhibit A): in addition to the
Statement of Qualification Narrative, complete this SOQ Form as well, including
information on Federal, State, and local permits and licenses, as applicable
• Key Team Member Resumes – please keep each resume to no more than 2 pages ,
highlighting the most relevant experiences, skill sets, etc. related to this project
• Client References (see Exhibit B)
• Anti-Collusion Statement (see Exhibit C)
• Contra Costa County Business Opportunity Registration Form (see Exhibit D):
submit this for applicant firm and all sub-consulting firms; if your firm is not an
SBE per the County’s SBE Program guidelines, still submit the SBE Registration
form with your firm’s name and write “NOT QUALIFIED UNDER COUNTY SBE
PROGRAM” across the sheet)
• Addenda Acknowledgement (see Exhibit E)
• General Conditions (Purchases of Services – Long Form) (see Attachment A)
• W-9 and State Business Verification
• Certificate of Insurance with Endorsement Letter
B. SOQ Submission
a. Response to this RFQ MUST be submitted electronically through the
BidSync/Periscope website – NO EXCEPTION
b. Late submittals WILL NOT be accepted – NO EXCEPTION
C. Client References (Exhibit B)
Respondents shall provide a list with a minimum of three (3) references. Each reference
must include the name of the person, their organization, their relationship to your
organization, the years known, and current contact information.
D. Licenses and Permits
44
12
Respondents shall possess all licenses, registrations and permits required by the State of
California and the County of Contra Costa, as applicable. Such licenses and permits are to
be submitted to the County with the SOQ or prior to the contract signing date.
E. Submittal Expenses
Respondents shall be fully responsible for all costs incurred in the development and
submittals for this RFQ.
F. Respondent Responsibility
The Respondent assumes sole responsibility for the complete effort required in
submitting an SOQ in response to this RFQ. No special consideration will be given after
SOQs are opened because of a Respondent’s failure to be knowledgeable as to all of the
requirements of this RFQ.
G. Interpretation
Should any discrepancies, omissions, or doubt as to their meaning be found in the RFQ
specifications or requirements, the Respondent shall notify the County in writing through
the BidSync/Periscope website. The County will send written instructions or addenda to
all participants in the RFQ process. The County shall not be responsible for oral
interpretations.
H. Reservation
The County reserves the right to do the following at any time and for its own convenience,
at its sole discretion:
• To reject any and all SOQs without indicating any reasons for such rejection
• Terminate this RFQ and issue a new RFQ anytime thereafter
• Extend any or all deadlines specified in the RFQ, including deadlines for accepting
SOQs by issuing an Addendum at any time prior to the deadline for receipt of
responses to the RFQ
• Procure any services specified in the RFQ by other means
• Disqualify any Respondent on the basis of any real or perceived conflict of interest
or evidence of collusion that is disclosed by the SOQ or other data available to the
County. Such disqualification is at the sole discretion of the County.
• Reject the SOQ of any Respondent that is in breach of or in default under any other
agreement with the County
• Reject any Respondent deemed by the County to be non -responsive, unreliable,
unqualified, or non-responsible
I. Truth and Accuracy of Representation
False, misleading, incomplete, or deceptively unresponsive statements in connection
with a submittal shall be sufficient cause for rejection of the submittal.
45
13
J. Sub-Contract and Assignment
The Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. Prior
written consent of the County, is required before the Contractor may enter into
subcontracts for any work contemplated under the Contract, or before the Contractor
may assign the Contract or monies due or to become due, by operation of law or
otherwise.
K. Addenda
No one is authorized to amend any of these documents in any respect by an oral
statement or to make any representation or interpretation in conflict with their
provisions. Any changes to these documents will be issued in writing via addenda to be
posted on the BidSync/Periscope website.
L. Addenda Acknowledgement
All addenda shall include an acknowledgement of receipt that must be returned. The
addenda must be signed and attached to the final response. Failure to attach any
addendum may result in the rejection of the response. See Exhibit E.
M. Non-Collusion
By submitting a signed submittal, Respondent certifies that there has been no collusion
with any other Respondent. Reasonable grounds for believing Respondent has an
interest in more than one submittal will result in rejection of all submittals in which th e
Respondent has an interest. Any party to collusion may not be considered in future
submittals for the same or similar work. See Exhibit C.
46
14
Section IV: Evaluation and Selection Process
A. Selection Process
All Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) received will be evaluated by a Selection
Committee. Each SOQ will be evaluated for completeness and overall responsiveness to
the requirements contained in this RFQ. The following criteria, will be evaluated to
determine which applicant best meets the needs of the County as described in Section III:
Program Elements and Possible Score
I. Organizational History and Overview 0-30 pts
o Relevancy of the organization’s vision, mission, and strategic goals.
o Demonstrates alignment of purpose and values.
o Priority areas of investment and current portfolio reflect a commitment
to addressing the needs of marginalized, underserved, Black
communities.
o Describes competencies and expertise needed to establish rapport, trust
and credibility with marginalized, underserved, Black communities.
II. Scope of Services Understanding and Experience 0 – 40 pts
o Demonstrates a strong level of understanding, knowledge, and
experience working in partnership and supporting Black -led, Black
community-serving grassroots organizations.
o Demonstrates expertise in grantmaking, including the administration and
management of grant contracts, relationship - and capacity-building with
grantees.
o Describes similar projects/initiatives completed .
III. Team member qualifications 0 – 30 pts
o Qualifications, lived experiences, expertise and related projects of staff
are sufficient to deliver on the full scope of work.
o Staff areas of specialization and related projects they have worked on that
align with this scope of services.
o Description of each team member’s role and area of responsibility in the
project.
Total: 100 points
IV. Preferential Points for Supplemental Resources
o To what extent are matching resources identified to supplement funding
that will expand capacity and opportunities for grantees? Are there other
initiatives or efforts that the organization is or will be implementing that
can be leveraged and aligned to amplify or extend the project goals and
impact?
o Points equaling up to 5% (or 5 points) of the total score possible will be
added to the applicant’s total score. The addition of these preferential
points will make up the applicant’s final score.
47
15
B. Evaluation and Negotiation
Upon completion of the review of SOQs, the County will notify Respondents if further
evaluation and negotiation is necessary. Respondents may be contacted for an interview,
but only if needed. The key team members identified in the SOQ should attend the
interview. Interviews will be 30-60 minutes. Any delay caused by Respondent’s failure to
respond to direction from the County may lead to a rejection of the SOQ.
C. Award of Contract
If the County determines after further evaluation and negotiation, to award the Contract,
a Contract will be sent to the successful Respondent for signature. No submittal shall be
binding upon the County until after the Contract is signed by duly authorize d
representatives of both Respondent and the County.
D. Submittals are Public Records
California Government Code Section 6250, the Public Records Act, defines a public record
as any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business
prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency regardless of phy sical
form or characteristics. The Public Records Act provides that public records shall be
disclosed upon request and that any person has a right to inspect any public record,
unless the document is exempted from disclosure.
Unless otherwise compelled by a court order, the County will not disclose any submittals
while the County conducts its deliberative process in accordance with the procedures
identified in this RFQ. However, after the County either awards a contract to a su ccessful
Respondent, or rejects all submittals, the County will consider each submittal subject to
the public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. Each Respondent
is hereby informed that, upon submittal of its SOQ to the County in accordance with this
RFQ, the SOQ becomes the property of Contra Costa County.
E. Appeal Procedures
In the event a dispute arises concerning the RFQ process prior to the award of the
contract, the party wishing resolution of the dispute shall submit an appeal in writing to
the attention of:
Kendra Carr and Peter Kim, Co-Directors
Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
Contra Costa County
1026 Escobar Street, Suite 2B
Martinez CA, 94553
Appeals must be submitted no later than 12:00 P.M. on Friday, November 1, 2024.
Notification of a final decision on the appeal shall be made in writing to the Responder
within ten (10) days, or November 11, 2024, and the decision of ORESJ shall be final and
not subject to further review. When submitting an appeal, the appellant must clearly
48
16
state the action appealed, the harm to the appellant, and the remedy sought. Appeals
shall be limited to the following technical grounds:
• Failure of the County to follow the review and selection procedures and adhere
to requirements specified in the RFQ or any addenda or amendments to the RFQ.
• There has been a violation of conflict of interest as provided by California
Government Code Section 87100 et seq.
• There has been a violation of State or Federal law.
49
17
Section V: Contract Information and Requirements
A. Contract Information:
1. Contract Period
Any agreement awarded as a result of this RFQ will include the County’s general terms
and conditions, attached as Attachment A to this RFQ. The initial term of any
agreement awarded as a result of this RFQ will be for up to 31 months. Nothing in this
RFQ, and nothing in an agreement awarded as a result of this RFQ, commits the County
to contract with the successful responder for any particular length of time.
All other factors being substantially equal, preference will be given to respondents
located within Contra Costa County. For purposes of this RFQ, a respondent is located
in Contra Costa County if its principal place of business has been located in Contra
Costa County for at least six months immediately prior to the issuance of this RFQ.
2. Contract Monitoring and Evaluation
On behalf of the County, the Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (ORESJ) will
actively monitor all services provided through the contract that results from this RFQ
process. This monitoring will determine if the Contractor is performing as intended or
if good cause exists to terminate the contract prior to the end of the contract term.
At a minimum, Contractor(s) will be expected to:
a. Perform all services without material deviation from an agreed -upon Service
Plan;
b. Complete annual summary progress reports for the County;
c. Maintain adequate records of service provision to document compliance with
Service Plan and complete any forms provided by the County; and
d. Cooperate with the collection of other fiscal/administrative/service data as
requested by the County.
The County will:
a. Negotiate a service contract that identifies specific performance outputs
and/or outcomes to be achieved during the contract term;
b. Review contract at least once within the contract period to ensure compliance
with output/outcome requirements, document any non -compliance, and
establish a Corrective Action Plan as needed;
c. Be part of the monitoring of subcontracts written by and entered into by the
Contractor that utilizes funds awarded under this solicitation; and
d. Provide information to Contractor concerning additional State or County data
requirements not provided here or in the resulting contract.
3. Contract Management Responsibilities
50
18
The Contractor’s Contract Manager shall also be responsible for all matters related
to the firm’s personnel and subconsultants performance including but not limited
to:
• Supervising, reviewing, monitoring, and directing the firm’s personnel, and
managing subconsultants.
• Assigning qualified personnel to complete the requested services.
• Administering personnel actions for firm’s personnel and ensuring appropriate
actions taken for subconsultant personnel.
• Maintaining organized project files for record tracking and auditing.
• Developing, organizing, facilitating, and attending scheduled coordination
meetings.
• Implementing and maintaining quality control procedures to manage conflicts,
ensure product accuracy, and identify critical reviews and milestones.
• Reviewing invoices for accuracy and completion before billing to County.
• Providing invoices in a timely manner and providing monthly contract
expenditures.
• Managing overall budget for contract and provide report to the County Contract
Manager.
• Ensuring compliance with the provisions of the contract and all specific Task
Order requirements.
• Ensuring the health and safety of personnel working in a hazardous environment
in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, and Local regulations as
applicable.
51
19
Exhibit A: Statement of Qualification Form
SECTION A
Business Name: __________________________________________ Phone #: _____________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________
City: __________________________________________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________________
Federal Tax ID #: ____________________________ Business License #: ______________________
Business Status:
_____Non Profit Corporation
_____Corporation State of Incorporation:_______________________
_____General Partnership
_____Limited Partnership
_____Sole Proprietorship
Other: __________________________
Name and title of an Officer or owner authorized to sign this Statement of Qualification and any
contract with the County that may result.
Name: __________________________________________________ Title: ________________________
SECTION B
Number of years in business under present business name: ____________________________________
Other Business Name(s): ________________________________________________________________
Number of years under prior name if any: ___________________________________________________
SECTION C
Number of years of experience in providing required, equivalent, or related projects: _______________
52
20
SECTION D
Similar services/projects completed during the last five years?
Period Services $ Amount Paid Location Agency Name
1 - __________________________________________________________________________________
2 - __________________________________________________________________________________
3 - __________________________________________________________________________________
4 - __________________________________________________________________________________
5 - __________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION E
Have you, or your agency failed or refused to complete a contract? _____ YES ______ No
If yes, explain: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION F
Is your firm authorized to do business in the State of California? _____Yes _____No
SECTION G
Is your firm a State of California registered small business? ______Yes ______No
SECTION H
Is your firm a local Business? ______Yes ______No
SECTION I
Explain any litigation similar to the services requested by this proposal involving you, or your agency,
or any principal officer(s) thereof:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
53
21
SECTION J
Has your company filed any written declaration for bankruptcy protection, a potential merger or
acquisition, office closure, pending lawsuits, financial loss that might affect your ability to perform
under the Contract? _________ Yes _________ No (if yes, please explain): _____________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION K
License Provisions
Has your company changed names or license numbers in the past 10 years? If yes, please state reason
for change. Yes_____ No_____
Reason
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION L
List the names and titles of the key personnel who would be assigned to the Contract.
Name Classification
___________________________________ _____________________________________________
___________________________________ _____________________________________________
___________________________________ _____________________________________________
___________________________________ _____________________________________________
54
22
SECTION M
List all required business and professional licenses that pertain to this Contract:
License Number Type Expiration Date
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION N
Do you and your agency agree to provide additional information as required by the County to make
an informed determination of qualifications? ______ Yes _____ No
By signing this Statement of Qualification, you are certifying that all information provided on this
form and contained within your proposal are true, and you acknowledge that if the proposal contains
any false statements, the County may declare any contra ct or agreement made as a result of the
proposal to be void.
Signature: ________________________________________________ Date: ______________________
Authorized Name: ____________________________________Title: _____________________________
55
23
Exhibit B: Client References
Organization:
Contact Person:
Address:
Tel. Number:
City, State, Zip:
Email Address:
Relationship / Years Known:
Organization:
Contact Person:
Address:
Tel. Number:
City, State, Zip:
Email Address:
Relationship / Years Known:
Organization:
Contact Person:
Address:
Tel. Number:
City, State, Zip:
Email Address:
Relationship / Years Known:
Firm Name:___________________________________________________________________________________
Authorized Staff Name: ______________________________________ Title: _________________________
Authorized Signature: _______________________________________ Date: _________________________
56
24
Exhibit C: Anti-Collusion Statement
By signing this form, the Bidder agrees that this submittal is made without any other
understanding, agreement, or connection with any person, corporation, or firm submitting
an Statement of Qualifications quote for the same purpose and that the quote is in all respects
fair and without collusion or fraud,
IT IS AGREED BY THE UNDERSIGNED BIDDER, THAT THE SIGNING AND DELIVERY OF THE
SOQ REPRESENTS THE BIDDER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
FORGOING SPECIFICATIONS AND PROVISIONS, AND IF AWARDED, THIS CONTRACT WILL
REPRESENT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BIDDER AND THE COUNTY.
NAME OF FIRM: ____________________________________________________________
SIGNED BY: _________________________________________________________________
[Sign in ink in the space above]
TITLE: ______________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________
CITY & STATE: _____________________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: ______________________________________________________________________
57
25
Exhibit D: County Business Opportunities Registration
Place Holder
See Attached
58
26
Exhibit E: Addenda Acknowledgement
TO BE RETURNED WITH STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
RFQ No.: _____________________ Title: ______________________________________________________
ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Please initial for addendums received)
Addendum #1: _________________ Addendum #3: _____________________
Addendum #2: _________________ Addendum #4: _____________________
Company Name: _____________________________________________________________
Contact Name: _______________________________________________________________
Email: _________________________________________ Phone No.: __________________
Address:______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Authorized Signature: ______________________________________________________
Date: _________________________________________________________________________
59
27
Attachment A: General Conditions (Purchase of Services –
Long Form)
Place Holder
See Attached
60