The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 06132011 - FHS Cte Agenda Pkt Agen 1. Int 2. Pu (sp DISC 3. Re ap 4. Re 5. Re 6. Re ☺ The Com Any of m 651 Pub For Ad da Items: troductions ublic comme peakers ma CUSSION eferral #10 ppointment Presente eferral #1 – Presente eferral #92 Presente eferral #82 Presente e Family and mmittee meetin y disclosable p members of the 1 Pine Street, 1 blic comment m dditional In S Items ent on any ay be limite 01 – Appoi ts. r: Rhonda – Child Ca r: Rhonda 2 – Local C r: Ruth Fe 2 – Second r: Denice The n Human Service ngs. Contact the public records r e Family and H 10th floor, durin may be submitte formation C Supervis Supervisor may be taken item under d to three m ntments to a Smith, E are Afforda a Smith, E Child Care ernandez, dhand Smo Dennis, H next meetin is sche es Committee e staff person lis related to an op Human Service ng normal busin d via electronic Contact: sor Gayle B Federal D. n out of order r the jurisdic minutes). o the Fami mploymen ability Fund mploymen & Develop County Of oke Ordina Health Serv ng of the F eduled for will provide re sted below at lea pen session ite s Committee le ness hours. mail on agenda B. Uilkema, Glover, Di based on the ction of the ly and Chi nt and Hum d nt and Hum pment Plan ffice of Ed ance vices Depa Family and r August 8, easonable acco ast 72 hours be em on a regular ess than 96 ho a items at least FA SERV 651 District II, C strict V, Vic e business of Committee ildren’s Tru man Servic man Servic nning Cou ucation artment Human S , 2011 at 1 ommodations f efore the meetin r meeting agen ours prior to tha one full work da Phone AMILY VICES Pine Stree Chair ce Chair f the day and e and not o ust Comm ces Depart ces Depart uncil – Fun Services Co 11:00 a.m. for persons wit ng. nda and distrib at meeting are ay prior to the p Dorothy e (925) 335- AND H S COMM J et, Room 1 preference of on this agen ittee – Thr tment tment ding Priori ommittee th disabilities p buted by the Co available for pu published meetin y Sansoe, Co -1009, Fax (9 dsans@ca HUMA MITTE une 13, 20 11:00 A. 101, Martin f the Committ nda ree ities planning to atte ounty to a majo ublic inspection ing time. ommittee St 925) 646-13 ao.cccounty N E 11 M. ez tee end ority n at taff 353 .us Page 1 Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CDBG Community Development Block Grant CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT State Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et ali (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS Department of Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Schedule of Upcoming BOS Meetings June 21 June 28 July 12 Page 2 1 Employment and Human Services Department Contra Costa County _________________________________________________________ TO: Family and Human Services Committee Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II, Chair Supervisor Federal Glover, District V, Vice Chair FROM: Joe Valentine, Director, Employment and Human Services Department Rhonda Smith, FACT Staff RE: Update to FHS Report dated April 15, 2011 regarding Vacant At-Large Seat Recommendations DATE: June 6, 2011 RECOMMENDATION(S)__________________________________________________ The Director of the Employment and Human Services Department requests that the Family and Human Services Committee accept its recommendations to appoint the following members for at-large seats to the FACT Committee: 1. Debra Vinson Mental Health Specialist 3005 Cleveland Pl. Antioch, CA 94509 H: (925) 698-1987 debravinson@gmail.com 2. Cathryn Freitas Retired 2408 Whitetail Drive Antioch, CA 94531 P: 925-778-1161 C: 925-519-6018 dpfreitas@comcast.net 3. Dr. Connie Portero International Literacy Foundation, Founder, CEO 5440 Modoc Ave Richmond, CA 94804 H: (510) 526-7261 W: (510) 375-9322 drportero@uyahoo.com NOMINIEES FOR MEMBERSHIP_________________________________________ On May 9, 2011, the Director of Employment and Human Services recommended that the Family and Human Services Committee accept the recommendations of FACT to appoint three members to its vacant at-large seats. The recommendation was placed on hold for future discussion at the June 13, 2011 FHS Committee meeting for two reasons: first the FACT Committee did not have three vacant seats available to appoint members Page 3 2 to and secondly the FHS Committee requested that FACT provide the names of the institutions which the candidates for membership received their degrees. In response to reason one, on May 9, 2011 the committee requested that the Board of Supervisors accept the resignations of three FACT members and declare the seats they occupied vacant. This recommendation was accepted on May 17, 2011 (Item C.14). In response to reason two, the committee has provided the requested information below. Debra Vinson: Ms. Vinson has a Masters of Arts (MA) in Counseling Psychology, with a Specialization in Children and Adolescents from John F. Kennedy University. Cathryn Freitas: Mrs. Freitas has a Master of Public Administration (MPA) from George Washington University. Dr. Connie Portero: Dr. Portero has a Counselor of Education (EdS) from the University of Iowa and a Phd. in Planning, Policy and Leadership in Higher Education, also from the University of Iowa. Based on the above provided information, the Director of EHSD on behalf of FACT recommends that the FHS Committee appoint Debra Vinson, Dr. Connie Portero, and Cathyrn Freitas to at-large seats on the FACT Committee Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 1 Employment and Human Services Department Contra Costa County ________________________________________________________ TO: Family and Human Services Committee Supervisor Federal Glover, Vice Chair Supervisor, Gayle B. Uilkema, Chair FROM: Joe Valentine, Director, Employment and Human Services Department Rhonda Smith, FACT Staff RE: Annual Child Care Affordability Report DATE: May 31, 2011 RECOMMENDATION(S)__________________________________________________ ACCEPT this report on the current status of the Child Care Affordability Fund from the Family and Children’s Trust Committee (FACT) and direct the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) to negotiate a contract for the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 with the Contra Costa Child Care Council in the amount of $250,000. Additionally, the Director requests that the Family and Human Services Committee (FHS) consider delegating the authority to extend the negotiated contract for up to an additional year and a half, as it is clear that funds would be depleted prior to the end of FY 2013- 2014. BACKGROUND__________________________________________________________ In 1991, the Board of Supervisors earmarked $250,000 of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) from the Embassy Suites Hotel to support/expand county-wide child care for low- income families. In 1997, the Board approved a recommendation from the Family and Human Services Committee that the Family and Children’s Trust Committee (FACT) be responsible for establishing priorities for use of the Child Care Affordability funds, developing and managing the competitive process for awarding these monies, and monitoring the resulting programs for contract compliance and achievement of outcomes. In 2002, the Board approved a two-year funding cycle for disbursement of the funds. Effective July 1, 2008 the 2008-2009 County budget modified the funding stream such that Childcare Affordability funds would no longer be generated from the revenue of the Transient Occupancy Tax but, instead, be funded by residual funds in the County Employee’s Dependent Care Account. Up to a maximum of $250,000 is now transferred Page 11 2 to EHSD each year from the Dependent Care account, to support the Childcare Affordability contracts, depending upon the balance in the fund. The resulting change in the funding stream created an unanticipated situation that the Committee addressed in January, 2009 when it elected to continue funding its current contract and future contracts at the same $250,000 level until the funds were exhausted. It is anticipated that the Child Care Affordability funds will be depleted prior to end of FY2013-2014. CURRENT CONTRACTOR REPORTS______________________________________ Having successfully completed the 2010-2011 Child Care Affordability Request for Proposal, the Contra Costa Child Care Council was awarded the grant and provides parent-choice subsidies for families. Services are based on the priorities developed from the 2009 FACT Needs Assessment which determined that the highest priority for services was “the provision of parent-choice child care subsidies for low-income working parents and/or parents in school or work training programs who have toddlers needing child care or children who would benefit from preschool enrollment.” In addition to administering the subsidy program, Contra Costa Child Care Council provides the families receiving assistance: 1) free workshops, education and resources to parents to help them build strong families and make the best child care choices; 2) free child care referrals to give parents choices and help parents meet their life/work needs; and 3) free or minimal cost training for child care providers to help them build sustainable businesses and to provide quality, healthy, and age-appropriate care, including caring for children with special needs. Currently, 21 children from 13 families receive much needed supportive childcare assistance from the Council. The average age for children receiving childcare services is 4.9 years, with the youngest child being 1.7 years old and the oldest being 11.79 years. 80% of child care providers are Licensed Child Care Centers, while 41% are Family Childcare Homes and 20% of the children are cared for by an approved relative. Family demographics indicate that 77% (10) of the families receiving subsidized childcare are low-income working parents while the remaining 23% (3) of the families are in school or work training programs. The FACT Committee believes that Contra Costa Child Care Council has provided exemplary services to children and their families as indicated by data collection, contract monitoring, and site-visits. At this time, the Council has successfully met their goals and objectives of their contract obligations. Page 12 3 FUNDING AND THE TRANSITION PLAN___________________________________ As the table below illustrates, Child Care Affordability funding will be depleted before the end of FY 2013/14. Estimated Account Balance as of June 2011 $594,520 Spend-Down FY 11/12 Earned FY 11/12 Estimated as of June 2012 Spend- Down FY 12/13 Earned FY 12/13 Estimated as of June 2013 Spend- Down FY 13/14 Earned FY 13/14 Estimated as of June 2014 (250,000) 40,00 0 384,520 (250,0 00) 40,00 0 174,520 (250,0 00) 40,00 0 (35,480) In an effort to address this issue in collaboration with Contra Costa County Child Care Council, the FACT Committee has developed a transition plan to ensure that families supported by FACT subsidized childcare funding will continue to receive services. As a part of routine contract monitoring, the FACT Committee will oversee the actions taken under the transition plan and request changes as necessary to better meet the needs of family. The initial stage of the transition plan states that over the next two and a half years, current families supported by FACT funds will continue as is with one exception. Child Care Council has stated that they will began to offer FACT funded families the option of choosing center based preschool under Preschool Makes a Difference (PMD) funding, where appropriate. This is a new option for families seeking preschool services and is funded by First 5 Contra Costa. PMD is a collaboration between Contra Costa Child Council, Contra Costa County Office of Education, Contra Costa Employment and Human Services Department, and West Contra Costa Unified School District. The PMD program is a partnership between early care providers and parents who receive scholarships for children whose parents qualify for the program based on income eligibility and service need. PMD supports licensed child care providers (in-home and center based) by improving the quality of Contra Costa County’s early childhood education programs, and provides support and financial incentives to child care providers who maintain and/or improve quality. In 2014, the families receiving FACT funded subsidized care will be transitioned to either a PMD or the Child Care Alternative Payment (CAP) Program once the Childcare Affordability Funds are thoroughly depleted. The CAP program acts as an intermediary between California Department of Education (CDE), the child care provider, and the family, to provide care through vouchers. Vouchers provide funding for a specific child to obtain care in a licensed child care center, licensed family day care home, or license- exempt care. With a voucher, the family has the choice of which type of care to utilize. Vouchers reimburse care providers based on the market rates charged by private providers in their region. Page 13 4 It is the belief of the FACT Committee that the transition plan proposed provides for the continuation of parent-choice subsidized child care without creating an interruption in services to those currently receiving support. REQUEST TO EXTEND CURRENT CONTRACT_____________________________ At this time, the committee requests that the FHS Committee authorize EHSD to extend the existing contract it has with the Child Care Council (due to expire on June 30, 2011) until the Child Care Affordability funds have been exhausted and waive the requirement of conducting an additional RFP process. This request is based on the following rationale: 1. Based on current estimates, the funding available will not cover a full 2-year cycle, 2. The Child Care Affordability RFP process requires a comprehensive needs assessment, including an extensive service provider and consumer survey which represent a significant monetary and staffing cost, and 3. Historically, prior RFP’s for this funding have resulted in only one bidder, despite extensive outreach efforts on the part of the Committee and EHSD. Additionally, over the past year and a half, the current contractor has complied with the conditions of the contract in an exemplary fashion. Based on the above information, the FACT Committee and EHSD recommend extending the existing contract with the Contra Costa Child Care Council until Child Care Affordability Funds have been depleted. Additionally, the FACT Committee and EHSD recommend continued funding to the Contra Costa Child Care Council for FY 2011-2012 and requests the Family and Human Services Committee forward this recommendation to the full Board for approval. Page 14 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 13, 2011 TO: Family and Human Services Committee Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II, Chair Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V, Vice Chair Contra Costa County Office of Education Dr. Joseph A. Ovick, Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools Dr. Pamela Comfort, Associate Superintendent, Educational Services FROM: Ruth Fernández, LPC Coordinator/Manager, Educational Services SUBJECT: Local Child Care and Development Planning Local Funding Priorities Report Referral # 92 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the funding priorities for Contra Costa County reviewed and approved by Local Planning Council members at the LPC board meeting held on Thursday, May 26, 2011 from 5:30 – 7:30 p.m. The below priorities were reviewed and discussed at a public hearing held on May 26, 2011 at the Contra Costa County Office of Education. California Center Priorities (Contract type: CCTR) Priority 1: Option 2 94509, 94513, 94520, 94531, 94553, 94561, 94564, 94565, 94801, 94803, 94804, 94806 Priority 2: Option 2 94505, 94518, 94519, 94521, 94523, 94530, 94547, 94572, 94596, 94597, 94805 Priority 3: Option 2 94506, 94514, 94517, 94525, 94526, 94563, 94582, 94583, 94598, 94708, 94808 California Preschool Priorities (Contract type: CPRE) Priority 1: Option 2 94509, 94513, 94520, 94531, 94561, 94565, 94801, 94803, 94804, 94805, 94806 Priority 2: Option 2 94505, 94518, 94519, 94521, 94523, 94530, 94547, 94553, 94564, 94596 Priority 3: Option 2 94514, 94517, 94525, 94526, 94572, 94582, 94583, 94597, 94598, 94808 See attached spreadsheet with specific data organized by zip code. Page 15 BACKGROUND/REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION(S): California Education Code (EC) Section 8499.5 (a) through (d) requires the LPCs to review local, State and Federal data and provide the CDE with an updated listing of their local child care and development funding priorities by May 30 every year. In 1998, Assembly Bill 1857 amended EC Section 8279.3 to include specific expanded mandates for LPCs to identify local funding priorities for the distribution of new state general child care and development and preschool funding to promote equal access to child development services across the state, based on direct impact indicators of need. The EC language specifies how LPCs are to conduct their yearly review of child development services in order to identify gaps in services and funding priorities which will ensure that all the child care and preschool services of the county are met to the greatest extent possible given limited resources. The LPC priorities will be used by the CDE to determine future child care and development funding decisions for State subsidized services. These priorities are first reviewed and approved by the members of the LPC for each county, which is made up of parent consumers of child care, child care and preschool providers, public agency representatives and community agency representatives who have been appointed by the County Board of Supervisors and the County Superintendent of Schools. Next, the priorities are made available for public review and finally reviewed and approved by the County Office of Education and County Board of Supervisors at a public hearing as prescribed in State regulations. Process for Establishing LPC Priorities: All county LPCs must use the methodology for establishing LPC priorities based on the population of the county. Per the California Department of Education (CDE) methodology, Contra Costa is one of the counties under option 2 which is for counties with over 1 million residents. After reviewing the data available to engage in the priority identification process, the LPC decided to utilize Option 2 as the formula (census data is not yet available). Option 2 methodology according to the CDE is defined as: Priority 1. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the highest numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the Centralized Eligibility List. Priority 2. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the second highest set of numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the Centralized Eligibility List. Priority 3. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the third highest set of number of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the Centralized Eligibility List. The Contra Costa County Local Planning Council for Child Care and Development (LPC) was established in April 1998. Required by AB 1542, which was passed in 1993, thirty members of the LPC were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors and the County Superintendent of Schools. Childcare consumers and providers, public agency representatives, and community representatives each comprise 20% of the LPC. The remaining 20% are discretionary appointees. Membership is for a three- year term. On January 7, 2003, membership was decreased from 30 to 25 members, due to the difficulty being experienced in filling all of the seats. Page 16 Membership consists of the following: • Five consumer representatives - a parent or person who receives or has received child care services in the past 36 months; • Five child care providers - a person who provides child care services or represents persons who provide child care services; • Five public agency representatives - a person who represents a city, county, city and county, or local education agency; • Five community representatives - a person who represents an agency or business that provides private funding for child care services or who advocates for child care services through participation in civic or community based organizations; • Five discretionary appointees - a person appointed from any of the above four categories or outside of those categories at the discretion of the appointing agencies. Appointments to the Contra Costa County Local Planning Council for Child Care and Development (LPC) are subject to the approval of the Board of Supervisors and County Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Joseph Ovick. The Board of Supervisors designated the Family and Human Services Committee to review and recommend appointments on their behalf. Dr. Pamela Comfort, Associate Superintendent, has been designated to review and recommend appointments on behalf of the Superintendent of Schools. Page 17 Contra Costa General Child Care and Development 2011 Priorities BOS DistrictZip CodeCityEarly Head StartExpansion slotsEarly Head StartCentralized Eligibility List (CEL)2011Includes (0-2)+(6+12)Previous Priority for 08/09Previous Priority for 09/10Priority Recommendations for 10/11Option 2Up to BUT no more than 1/3 of the zipcodeswith the second highest set of #s of children on the CEL3 94505 Discovery Bay 15 2 3 94506 Danville 13 3 3 94507 Alamo 1 00 3 5 94509 Antioch 0 0 177 1 11 3 94513 Brentwood 28 961 2 21 3 94514 Byron 12 61 2 3 4 94517 Clayton 1 11 3 3 4 94518 Concord 0 040 1 12 4 94519 Concord 7 232 1 22 4 94520 Concord 4 4 161 1 11 4 94521 Concord 56 20 33 1 22 4 94523 Pleasant Hill 5 317 3 22 2 94525 Rodeo-Crockett 3 16 3 3 3 94526 Danville 0 02 3 33 1 94530 El Cerrito 1 16 2 32 5 94531 Antioch 2 298 1 2 94547 Hercules 41 3 32 2 94549 Lafayette 9 512 3 2 2 94553 Martinez 0 057 2 11 2 94556 Moraga 12 10 0 5 94561 Oakley 0 0 105 2 21 2 94563 Orinda 9 51 3 3 2 94564 Pinole 0 049 2 31 5 94565 Pittsburg 4 2 271 1 11 2 94572 Rodeo-Crockett 28 11 34 3 22 3 94582 San Ramon 4 48 3 3 94583 San Ramon 4333 3 94595 Walnut Creek 1 00 3 3 3 94596 Walnut Creek 0 017 3 22 3 94597 Walnut Creek 0 022 2 3 94598 Walnut Creek 5 01 3 3 1 94708 Kensington 0 02 3 1 94801 Richmond 147 1 11 1 94803 El Sobrante 39 12 58 1 11 1 94804 Richmond 6 4 136 1 11 1 94805 Richmond 40 14 20 1 22 1 94806 San Pablo 14 5 249 2 11 1 94808 Richmond 45 20 1 3 Total 336 140 1896 Sources:Centralized Eligibility List Report- Contra Costa Child Care Council - 2011 report Formula Priority 1. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the highest numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL. Priority 2. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the second highest set of numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL Priority 3. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the third highest set of number of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL. Page 18 Contra Costa County State Preschool Priorities 2011 Report BOS DistrictZip CodeCityCentralized Eligibility List (CEL) 2011(ages 2-5)Recommendations for 10/11Using Option 2Up to BUT no more than 1/3 of the zipcodeswith the second highest set of #s of children on the CELPrevious Priorities for 08/09Previous Priorities for 09/103 94505 Discovery Bay* 11 2 3 94506 Danville 0 3 94507 Alamo 0 3 5 94509 Antioch 136 1 1 1 3 94513 Brentwood 56 1 3 94514 Byron 3 3 2 2 4 94517 Clayton 2 3 2 4 94518 Concord 26 2 4 94519 Concord 25 2 1 1 4 94520 Concord 145 1 1 3 4 94521 Concord 22 2 1 1 4 94523 Pleasant Hill 10 2 1 1 2 94525 Rodeo-Crockett 4 3 2 3 94526 Danville 1 3 3 1 94530 El Cerrito 10 2 5 94531 Antioch* 58 1 3 2 2 94547 Hercules 21 2 2 3 2 94549 Lafayette 0 2 94553 Martinez 38 2 2 2 2 94556 Moraga 0 5 94561 Oakley 111 1 2 3 2 94563 Orinda 0 2 94564 Pinole 29 2 2 5 94565 Pittsburg 155 1 1 1 2 94572 Rodeo-Crockett 7 3 3 3 3 94582 San Ramon 5 3 3 94583 San Ramon 2 3 3 3 3 94595 Walnut Creek 0 3 94596 Walnut Creek 10 2 2 3 94597 Walnut Creek 8 3 3 94598 Walnut Creek 2 3 1 94708 Kensington 0 0 1 1 1 94801 Richmond 210 1 1 1 94803 El Sobrante 55 1 1 1 1 94804 Richmond 195 1 1 1 94805 Richmond 53 1 3 1 1 94806 San Pablo 337 1 1 94808 Richmond 2 3 99999*various total 1749 Sources:Centralized Eligibility List Report- Contra Costa Child Care Council - 2011 report Formula Priority 1. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the highest numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL. Priority 2. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the second highest set of numbers of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL Priority 3. Option 2: Up to but no more than one-third of the zip codes with the third highest set of number of infants, toddlers and school age eligible children on the CEL. Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28