Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 03272017 - Finance Cte Agenda Pkt       FINANCE COMMITTEE March 27, 2017 9:00 A.M. 651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Chair Supervisor John Gioia, Vice Chair Agenda Items: Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee         1.Introductions   2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes).   3. CONSIDER approving the Record of Action for the December 6, 2016, Finance Committee meeting (Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director)   4. CONSIDER accepting attached Reissued Single Audit Reports for fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (Joanne Bohren, Chief Auditor)   5. CONSIDER attached report on the funding shortfall in the Wildcat/San Pablo Creeks Levee Remediation project in North Richmond and request for $990,000 from the County general fund to cover the funding shortfall (Paul Detjens, Senior Civil Engineer)   6. CONSIDER accepting Department of Conservation and Development's attached recommendations regarding FY 2017/18, FY 2018/19, & FY 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development & Infrastructure/Public Facilities Categories (Gabriel Lemus/CDBG Program Manager).   7. CONSIDER accepting a report from the Conservation and Development Department regarding a recommendation to the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency the approval of an issuance of 2017 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds by the Successor Agency (Kara Douglas, Assistant Deputy Director/Conservation and Development).   8. CONSIDER accepting the Quarterly Capital Projects Report (Brian Balbas, Deputy Public Works Director)   9.The next meeting is currently scheduled for April 24, 2017.   10.Adjourn   The Finance Committee will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Finance Committee meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of members of the Finance Committee less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, 10th floor, during normal business hours. Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time. For Additional Information Contact: Lisa Driscoll, Committee Staff Phone (925) 335-1021, Fax (925) 646-1353 lisa.driscoll@cao.cccounty.us FINANCE COMMITTEE 3. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:Record of Action for December 6, 2016 Finance Committee Meeting Submitted For: FINANCE COMMITTEE,  Department:County Administrator Referral No.: N/A   Referral Name: Record of Action  Presenter: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director 925-335-1023 Referral History: County Ordinance requires that each County body keep a record of its meetings. Though the record need not be verbatim, it must accurately reflect the agenda and the discussions made in the meetings. Referral Update: Attached for the Committee's consideration is the Record of Action for its December 6, 2016 meeting. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): Staff recommends approval of the Record of Action for the December 6, 2016 meeting. Fiscal Impact (if any): No fiscal impact. Attachments Draft Record of Action December 6, 2016 FINANCE COMMITTEE 4. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:Reissuance of Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2014 Single Audit Reports Submitted For: Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller  Department:Auditor-Controller Referral No.: 11/8/1999   Referral Name: Countywide Single Audit  Presenter: Joanne Bohren, Chief Auditor Contact: Joanne Bohren (925) 335-8640 Referral History: On November 8, 1999, the Board established a policy and procedure for addressing the annual findings and recommendations of the County's external auditors. The procedure directs that the Board refer the annual Single Audit findings to the Finance Committee, and that the County Administrator make a report to the Finance Committee on the current- and prior-year audit findings and recommendations that identifies what corrective action has been taken or is planned to be taken on each recommendation. Referral Update: The County's external auditors, Macias Gini & O'Connell, have reissued the County's Single Auditor reports for the fiscal year ending (FYE) June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014, due to their discovery of an unreported grant in the original Single Audit reports for those years. The grant being added an the related grantor information are as follows: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (passed thrugh the California Health Benefit Exchange) - State Planning and Establishment Grants for the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Exchanges (CFDA No. 93.525). Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): Adopt reissued reports and provide copies to whomever the original copies of the Single Audit reports were affected by the change. The revised Single Audit reports are also available on the Federal Clearinghouse website (https://harvester.census.gov/facdissem/Main.aspx). Attachments Reissued June 30, 2013 Report Reissued June 30, 2014 Report FINANCE COMMITTEE 5. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:Funding Shortfall in the Wildcat/San Pablo Creeks Levee Remediation Project in North Richmond Submitted For: Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer  Department:Public Works Referral No.: 2/9/2015 C.89   Referral Name: Funding Shortfall in the Wildcat/San Pablo Creeks Levee Remediation Project in North Richmond  Presenter: Paul Detjens, Senior Civil Engineer Contact: Paul Detjens (925) 313-2394 Referral History: Referral was submitted to the full Board of Supervisors as an action item on February 9, 2016. The items was originally heard at the February 18, 2016 Committee meeting and continued to March 2016 with a request for an updated funding/grant submittal plan. On March 15, 2016, staff presented a report to Finance regarding Flood Control's application for approximately $500,000 in State the Coastal Conservancy (SCC) Proposition 1 grant program. The application was to include $250,000 for the Wildcat /San Pablo Levee remediation project and the remainder was to go to Urban Tilth to create jobs for local youth and provide habitat assessment and creek restoration in the watershed. The amount was based on a recommendation from the SCC after the first unsuccessful attempt for the grant.  Referral Update: The Coastal Conservancy grant was not awarded. Since that time, there has been an increase in the engineer’s construction cost estimate (due to increased material and labor costs), and the cost to comply with more stringent environmental permit requirements. The requested funds are now $990,000. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER approving request of $990,000 to cover the funding shortfall. Fiscal Impact (if any): Requesting of $990,000 in general fund reserves. Attachments Request for $990,000  FINANCE COMMITTEE 6. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:FY 2017/18, FY 2018/19, & FY 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development & Infrastructure/Public Facilities Categories Submitted For: John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department  Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: CDBG Policy   Referral Name: CDBG Funding  Presenter: Gabriel Lemus, CDBG Program Manager Contact: Gabriel Lemus (925) 674-7882 Referral History: It is standard policy that CDBG funding decisions/policies be reviewed by the Finance Committee prior to scheduling for the full Board of Supervisors. Referral Update: See attached staff recommendations regarding projects. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER accepting Department of Conservation and Development's attached recommendations regarding FY 2017/18, FY 2018/19, & FY 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development & Infrastructure/Public Facilities Categories. Attachments FY 2017/18, FY 2018/19, & FY 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant - Economic Development & Infrastructure/Public Facilities Categories Funding Recommendations 2 Available Funding: Contra Costa County, as an entitlement jurisdiction, receives an annual allocation of CDBG directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD has a formula for the CDBG Program to determine the amount of CDBG funds that an entitlement jurisdiction will receive for the program year. However, the formula is dependent on an approved federal spending budget, or appropriations, for each federal fiscal year. Currently, HUD and most other federal agencies are currently being funded by a “Continuing Resolution” that extends through April 28, 2017. Based on the most current information available regarding the “Continuing Resolution” for the Fiscal Year 2017 federal budget, the County’s CDBG grant amount for FY 2017/18 is estimated to be about the same as it was in FY 2016/17 with a 0.19 percent reduction, or approximately $4,049,929. On November 4, 2014, the Board of Supervisors (Board) adopted funding guidelines for the allocation of CDBG funds that require the County’s annual grant be allocated to the following CDBG eligible categories: Category of Use Allocation Guidelines CDBG Program Available Funding** Affordable Housing 45% $1,822,468 Public Services *17% $ 688,488 Economic Development 10% $ 404,993 Infrastructure/Public Facility 8% $ 323,994 Administration 20% $ 809,986 Total FY 2017/18 CDBG Grant $4,049,929 *As long as the amount does not go over HUD’s statutory cap for Public Services **Estimated amounts based on information from the “Continuing Resolution” The CDBG Consolidated Plan operates under a five-year period. In October 2013, the Board approved having two separate and distinct funding cycles for the non-housing categories of the CDBG Program to align with the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. The first cycle is a two-year funding cycle (FY 2015/16 and FY 2016/17) for programs/projects in the CDBG public service, economic development, and infrastructure/public facilities categories. The second cycle (FY 2017/18, FY 2018/19, and FY 2019/20) is a three-year funding cycle to conclude the final three years of the five-year Consolidated Plan period. Economic Development Category: Pursuant to the Board’s guidelines, a total of $404,993 (10 percent of the County’s grant amount) is available for ED projects. In addition, there is $4,799 available to be recaptured from completed projects. Consequently, there is a total of $409,792 available and recommended to be allocated to eight eligible ED projects as listed in Attachment A. Given that the ED category operates under a three-year funding cycle to conclude the final three years of the CDBG Consolidated Plan period, the recommended amounts reflected for each respective agency/program for FY 2017/18 are the recommended amounts for the same agencies/programs for FY 2018/19 and FY 2019/20, contingent on the satisfactory performance of each respective agency/program and the County receiving a similar allocation of CDBG funds from HUD. 3 Infrastructure and Public Facility Category: Seven applications were received by the application deadline requesting a total of $640,670. Staff recommends four projects to be funded for FY 2017/18 and three projects to be funded for FY 2018/19 at the amounts indicated on Attachment B. Given that only three projects are recommended funding for FY 2018/19 funds and there were no projects that were recommended funding for FY 2019/20 funds, CDBG staff recommends issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) later this year for IPF projects to be carried out in FY 2018/19 and in FY 2019/20 provided that the County receives CDBG funds in FY 2018/19 and FY 2019/20. Application Process and Evaluation Criteria: Each applicant was required to submit an application describing the proposed project, need and target population, steps necessary to carry out the project, and proposed budget. Applications are reviewed by staff for completeness and eligibility and against criteria listed below. Applicants are also interviewed by staff to respond to or clarify any issues related to the application. Below are the general criteria used by staff in evaluating applications: Intended purpose (outcome) - The quantitative and qualitative goals of the project are achievable, measurable and result in a desirable outcome. Consistency with Priorities Established in the Consolidated Plan and County Policy – The project meets goals and strategies of the Consolidated Plan. Secondarily, the project meets goals of other plans such as Redevelopment Agency Plans, Capital Improvement Plans, community planning documents, etc. Eligibility in Respect to Federal Regulation – The proposed use of CDBG funds is consistent with federal regulations and is determined to be an eligible activity. The project meets one of the following three national objectives: benefit to very-low and low-income persons, preventing blight, or emergency need. Target Population and Demonstrated Need – The project fulfills a well-defined need and has supporting documentation that the need exists. The proposed project is responsive to the community and the target population, and shows a relationship between the need and the action to be taken. The target population or area is clearly defined, the project is accessible and outreach is effective. Financial Analysis - Total project costs are reasonable, and are adequate to carry out the project through the specified time period. The budget is well thought out with reasonable assumptions for completing the project with federal funding. A reasonable relationship exists between the cost of the project and the expected outcome. Sponsor has the capacity to secure all funds necessary to carry out the project within normal standards. Volunteer or in-kind services are attainable and realistic. The project cost is within normal range of similar projects. Projects are required to supply matching funds in order to maximize the use of CDBG funds. Audits or other financial statements demonstrate success in securing funds through grant proposals or other fund raising efforts. Experience and Capacity to Carry out the Project – Components of the project are fully described and goals and objectives are attainable. The project sponsor has demonstrated the ability to successfully carry out the proposed project including providing a project manager, construction manager and/or qualified licensed contractor. The applicant demonstrates that capacity exists to complete the project 4 and meet all the federal requirements of the CDBG program. Project Readiness and Timeliness – All components of the project are in place or can be in place within a specified period of time. Project can be implemented and completed in a timely manner. Particular attention is given to these criteria due to specific HUD timeliness requirements. Past Performance - Rate of progress toward completing contractual goals, ability to overcome and avoid past problems. Inaccurate or incomplete performance reports, unresolved audit findings, delays in or failure to submit required reports, persistent difficulties with payment request process, failure to correct significant problems. Environmental, Historic Preservation, Relocation, and/or Prevailing Wage Issues – Identification of federal requirements that may be imposed on the project that require specific action to be taken. Clarity and completeness of application - The application submitted was complete and lacked inaccuracies and ambiguities. Public Hearing and Transmittal of Recommendations: The Committee’s recommendations will be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors prior to the public hearing that is scheduled for May 9, 2017. Final recommendations must be forwarded to HUD by May 15, 2017 for review to ensure consistency with federal regulations. Attachments cc: John Kopchik, Conservation and Development Director Kara Douglas, Assistant Deputy Director – Conservation and Development Department Community Development Block Grant Economic Development Category FY 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A Project Name Amount Requested Amount Received FY 2016/17 County Staff Rec. for FY 2017/18 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC 17-01-ED Contra Costa Child Care Council Road to Success Microenterprise growth and assistance for 90 FCCH child care providers. $90,000 $81,000 $85,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $145,000 $245,250 59% 17-02-ED Multicultural Institute Lifeskills/Day Labor Program Provide job-matching, individualized assistance with health, legal, and educational needs to 300 poverty level and extremely-low income day laborers. $30,000 N/A $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 $79,273 33% 17-03-ED Open Opportunities, Inc. Future Build Pre- Apprenticeship Training Program Train 8 pre-apprentices in solar, energy, and construction trades. $9,640 $9,636 $9,640 $15,000 $4,802 $19,280 $0 $48,722 $481,444 10% 17-04-ED Opportunity Junction Job Training and Placement Program Provide 10 participants with job training, support services and job placement. $100,000 $85,000 $100,000 $60,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $190,000 $947,003 20% 17-05-ED Opportunity Junction Bay Point Career Development Services Provide intensive, individualized vocational services including assessment and development of employment plans, case management and service referrals to 30 low- income persons. $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $30,000 $172,491 17% 17-06-ED Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center Renaissance Richmond Intensive small business/ microenterprise training and technical assistance to 50 unduplicated lower-income individuals who own or wish to start a small business/ microenterprise $50,000 N/A $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $295,984 14% CCC Application No.OutcomeApplicant Economic Development Projects % Budget (CDBG) Total Budget Total CDBG Requested Contra Costa County Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions) Community Development Block Grant Economic Development Category FY 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A Project Name Amount Requested Amount Received FY 2016/17 County Staff Rec. for FY 2017/18 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC CCC Application No.OutcomeApplicant % Budget (CDBG) Total Budget Total CDBG Requested Contra Costa County Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions) 17-07-ED West Contra Costa Business Dev. Center, Inc. Emerging Entrepreneurs Program To provide technical assistance and support to 50 existing businesses or persons wishing to open a business as a way to create/retain jobs. $80,800 $65,000 $77,152 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,152 $244,800 32% 17-08-ED Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Small business training for 50 clients.$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $15,000 $30,000 $15,000 $15,000 $125,000 $325,000 38% $430,440 $310,636 $409,792 $105,000 $49,802 $89,280 $30,000 $704,522 $2,466,245 29%Total Community Development Block Grant Infrastructure/Public Facilities Category FY 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20 ATTACHMENT B Project Name Amount Requested County Staff Recommendation for FY 2017/18 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2018/19 17-01-IPF City of Oakley Oakley Senior Center Renovations Improvements/Renovation of the Oakley Senior Center located at 215 2nd Street, Oakley $130,500 $98,000 N/A $98,000 $149,000 66% 17-02-IPF Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District Pump and Drainage Pipe Replacement Project Replacement of existing pump and drainage pipe to prevent flooding in the Bethel Island neighborhood. $110,000 $82,500 N/A $82,500 $110,000 75% 17-03-IPF Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance West County Family Justice Center Roof Replacement Project Roof Replacement of the West County Family Justice Center located in the City of Richmond $191,000 $0 $95,000 $95,000 $191,000 50% 17-04-IPF Harmony Home, Associated Wheel Char lift Installation and Exterior Stairs Replacement Project Install a wheelchair lift and rebuild the existing stairs to Harmony Home's office building in Martinez to improve accessibility and allow more space for client services $87,000 $78,000 N/A $78,000 $87,000 90% 17-05-IPF Martinez Early Childhood Center, Inc. Children's Bathroom Addition and Floor Replacement Project Addition of a new ADA bathroom for children and replacement of interior floors of all the classrooms of the Martinez Early Childhood Center $69,040 $65,494 N/A $65,494 $76,600 86% CCC Application No.OutcomeApplicant Contra Costa County Infrastructure/Public Facilities Projects % Budget (CDBG) Total Budget Total CDBG Community Development Block Grant Infrastructure/Public Facilities Category FY 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20 ATTACHMENT B Project Name Amount Requested County Staff Recommendation for FY 2017/18 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2018/19 CCC Application No.OutcomeApplicant Contra Costa County Infrastructure/Public Facilities Projects % Budget (CDBG) Total Budget Total CDBG 17-06-IPF Martinez Early Childhood Center, Inc. Playground Re-Surfacing Project Replace the surfacing of an existing playground within the Martinez Early Childhood Center $27,630 $0 $27,630 $27,630 $30,719 90% 17-07-IPF Pogo Park Harbour-8 Park Shade Structure Project Install a new shade structure for an existing playground within Harbour-8 Park located in the City of Richmond $80,000 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $94,800 84% $695,170 $323,994 $202,630 $775,170 $739,119 105%TOTALS FINANCE COMMITTEE 7. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:Successor Agency of the Contra Costa County Redvelopment Agency - Issuance of Tax Allocation Bond (Refunding ) Submitted For: John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department  Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: 2017/110   Referral Name: Debt Policy  Presenter: Kara Douglas, Assistant Deputy Director Contact: Kara Douglas (925) 674-7205 Referral History: Debt Policy (Resolution 2017/110) requires County Finance Committee review of recommendation prior to issuance. Referral Update: See attached staff recommendations regarding a 2017 Tax Allocation Bond Refunding. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): ACCEPT report from the Conservation and Development Department regarding a recommendation to the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency the approval of an issuance of 2017 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds by the Successor Agency and forward to the full Board of Supervisors. Fiscal Impact (if any): The proposed refunding will save approximately $14 million net present value in debt service payments. The $14 million savings will go to the other taxing entities as provided for in the dissolution of the redevelopment agency.  Attachments Tax Allocation Bond Refunding CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Department of Conservation and Development Community Development Division 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: 674-7205 Fax; 674-7257 DATE: March 27, 2017 TO: Finance Committee FROM: Kara Douglas, Assistant Deputy Director SUBJECT: Tax Allocation Bond Refunding The purpose of this memorandum is to request the Finance Committee to recommend to the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) the approval of an issuance of the 2017 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (the “2017 Bonds”) by the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency has five outstanding series of tax allocation bonds totaling $86 million that will be callable on August 1, 2017 (2007 Bonds) or are currently callable. Table 1 – Outstanding Tax Allocation Bonds Series 1999 2003 2007A 2007AT 2007B 2007 Total Grand Total Par 7,170,000$ 5,550,000$ 50,725,000$ 22,865,000$ 13,105,000$ 86,695,000$ 99,415,000$ Prepaid (13,315,000) (13,315,000) (13,315,000) Net Par 7,170,000$ 5,550,000$ 37,410,000$ 22,865,000$ 13,105,000$ 73,380,000$ 86,100,000$ The County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority (the “Authority”) issued the bonds and they are backed by 12 underlying tax increment loans from five different project areas (Contra Costa Centre, Bay Point, North Richmond, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor). Table 2 – Summary of Loans Project Area Loans 1999 2003 2007 Non-Hsg 2007 Hsg 2007 Total Grand Total Contra Costa Centre 6,995,000$ 5,550,000$ 32,645,000$ -$ 32,645,000$ 45,190,000$ Bay Point 175,000 - 19,115,000 4,520,000 23,635,000 23,810,000 North Richmond - - 2,800,000 3,500,000 6,300,000 6,300,000 Rodeo - - 5,265,000 3,465,000 8,730,000 8,730,000 Montalvin Manor - - 1,390,000 680,000 2,070,000 2,070,000 Total 7,170,000$ 5,550,000$ 61,215,000$ 12,165,000$ 73,380,000$ 86,100,000$ The Department of Conservation and Development, which serves as the administrator of the Successor Agency, completed a competitive bid process for this transaction and selected Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. (Stifel) as the underwriter or placement agent for the 2017 Bonds after review of all proposals received. The proposed refunding will save approximately $14 million in debt service payments (on a net present value basis) or approximately 14.2% of refunded bonds, based on current market conditions. The 2017 Bonds may be structured in order to provide debt C:\Users\ldriscoll\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\CBND5XYI\Finance Committee TAB Refunding Request.doc 2 service savings in each year as compared to the refunded bonds, or with the same debt service shape, but with a shorter final maturity. The table below shows the two potential structures for the 2017 Bonds and the resulting cash flow savings provided under each scenario. It should be noted that this analysis factors in the $13 million that is currently held in escrow to pay a portion of the 2007A principal. Date  Existing Debt  Service   2017 Bonds  Debt Service  Option 1  Cash Flow  Savings ‐  Option 1  2017 Bonds  Debt Service  Option 2   Cash Flow  Savings ‐  Option 2  08/01/2018               7,860,875                6,106,285            1,754,591               7,857,583                      3,292  08/01/2019               7,872,892                6,102,248            1,770,644               7,857,305                   15,587  08/01/2020               7,861,383                6,100,980            1,760,403               7,860,333                      1,051  08/01/2021               7,866,124                6,103,115            1,763,009               7,858,932                      7,192  08/01/2022               8,152,451                6,105,230            2,047,221               7,855,973                 296,478  08/01/2023               8,127,300                6,102,241            2,025,059               7,853,250                 274,050  08/01/2024               8,138,206                6,105,161            2,033,045               7,855,750                 282,456  08/01/2025               8,113,102                6,104,774            2,008,328               7,854,750                 258,352  08/01/2026               8,008,210                6,106,250            1,901,960               7,854,750                 153,460  08/01/2027               7,967,399                6,103,500            1,863,899               7,855,000                 112,399  08/01/2028               7,981,641                6,107,000            1,874,641               7,854,750                 126,891  08/01/2029               8,692,867                6,106,000            2,586,867               7,858,250                 834,617  08/01/2030               8,692,892                6,105,250            2,587,642               6,814,500             1,878,392  08/01/2031               8,691,980                6,104,250            2,587,730             8,691,980  08/01/2032               8,699,382                6,102,500            2,596,882             8,699,382  08/01/2033               8,698,794                6,104,500            2,594,294             8,698,794  08/01/2034               8,604,648                6,104,500            2,500,148             8,604,648  08/01/2035               8,609,003                6,107,000            2,502,003             8,609,003  08/01/2036               4,846,892                3,401,250            1,445,642             4,846,892  08/01/2037               4,850,606                3,402,000            1,448,606             4,850,606  Total 158,336,647         116,684,034         41,652,613         101,091,125         57,245,521         In addition, the refunding will significantly simplify the Agency’s existing debt structure and will ease the staff’s tracking and reporting burden. The $14 million savings will go to the other taxing entities as provided for in the dissolution of the redevelopment agency. Stifel is currently evaluating proposals for a potential direct placement of the bonds, as well as pursuing a public bond sale. The 2017 Bonds will be issued directly by the Successor Agency and will not require issuance through the Authority. However, the Authority will need to approve the escrow agreement(s) related to the refunded bonds. The 2017 Bonds will be issued in two series, a tax-exempt and a taxable series. DCD staff has presented the refunding proposal to the County Debt Affordability Advisory Committee and has received the Committee’s support. Staff will continue to confer with the County Auditor- Controller throughout this process to determine the structuring details, including whether to reduce the annual debt service or to reduce the term. C:\Users\ldriscoll\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\CBND5XYI\Finance Committee TAB Refunding Request.doc 3 The proposed refunding schedule is very aggressive and targets early to mid-July to complete the refunding. The Governing Board of the Successor Agency will consider adopting a resolution to authorize the bonds and legal documents at its April 25th meeting. After the State Department of Finance has reviewed and approved the proposal (a process that can take up to 65 days to complete), the Governing Board of the Successor Agency will be asked to adopt a resolution approving the sale of the refunding bonds and the release of the Preliminary Official Statement (assuming a public sale is pursued). It is recommended that the Finance Committee approve the proposed financing in order to allow the Agency to realize debt service savings and to simplify the debt structure. FINANCE COMMITTEE 8. Meeting Date:03/27/2017   Subject:QUARTERLY CAPITAL PROJECTS REPORT Submitted For: FINANCE COMMITTEE,  Department:County Administrator Referral No.: 1/6/2009 SD.2   Referral Name: Quarterly Capital Projects  Presenter: Ramesh Kanzaria, Capital Projects Division Manager Contact: Brian Balbas (925) 313-2284 Referral History: On January 6, 2009, the Board of Supervisors approved recommendations for Board Member appointments to local, regional and statewide boards, committees and commissions for the 2009 calendar year. One of the adopted recommendations was to combine the Capital Facilities Committee with the Finance Committee. On February 2, 2009, the Finance Committee met and planned committee meetings and schedules for the coming year. One of the recommendations was for the Finance Committee to receive regular capital facility update reports. The first report was presented to Finance on March 4, 2009 by the Director of General Services, Mike Lango. The Committee reviewed the initial report and requested that additional financing and appropriation information be added to make the report more meaningful. The final report format was accepted at the April 6, 2009 meeting and staff was directed to include on future Finance Committee agendas. Reports were submitted at each Finance Committee meeting through December 2010. Beginning in 2011, the Finance Committee requested that Capital Facility Reports be reviewed quarterly. Quarterly review of Capital Facility Reports is the current practice. Referral Update: Quarterly update. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): ACCEPT Quarterly Capital Projects update. Attachments Capital Projects Update Report