HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 03092015 - PPC Agenda Pkt
PUBLIC PROTECTION
COMMITTEE
March 9, 2015
1:00 P.M.
651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez
Supervisor John Gioia, Chair
Supervisor Federal D. Glover, Vice Chair
Agenda
Items:
Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference
of the Committee
1.Introductions
2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this
agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes).
3. APPROVE Record of Action from the February 9, 2015 meeting. (Page 3)
4. CONSIDER approving recommendations of the East/Central County Network Manager
to reallocate program allocations in the East Central Network System of Services
budget, with no change to the total budget amount of $800,000, for fiscal year 2015/16
and accept a report, including recommendations, on the status of AB 109 community
programs. (Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator) (Page 7)
5. CONSIDER accepting a report on County Service Area P-6 and provide direction to
staff regarding future action. (Timothy Ewell, Committee Staff) (Page 14)
6.The next meeting is currently scheduled for April 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM
7.Adjourn
The Public Protection Committee will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with
disabilities planning to attend Public Protection Committee meetings. Contact the staff person
listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and
distributed by the County to a majority of members of the Public Protection Committee less than
96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, 10th floor,
during normal business hours.
Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day
prior to the published meeting time.
For Additional Information Contact:
Timothy Ewell, Committee Staff
Phone (925) 335-1036, Fax (925) 646-1353
timothy.ewell@cao.cccounty.us
PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE 3.
Meeting Date:03/09/2015
Subject:RECORD OF ACTION - February 9, 2015
Submitted For: PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE,
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: N/A
Referral Name: RECORD OF ACTION
Presenter: Timothy Ewell, Committee Staff Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925)335-1036
Referral History:
County Ordinance requires that each County body keep a record of its meetings. Though the
record need not be verbatim, it must accurately reflect the agenda and the decisions made in the
meeting.
Referral Update:
Attached for the Committee's consideration is the Record of Action for its February 9, 2015
meeting.
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
APPROVE Record of Action from the February 9, 2015 meeting.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
No fiscal impart. This item is informational only.
Attachments
Record of Action - February 9, 2015
Page 3 of 115
PUBLIC PROTECTION
COMMITTEE
February 9, 2015
1:00 P.M.
651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez
Supervisor John Gioia, Chair
Supervisor Federal D. Glover, Vice Chair
Agenda Items:Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee
Present: John Gioia, Chair
Federal D. Glover, Vice Chair
Staff Present:David J. Twa, County Administrator
Timothy M. Ewell, Senior Deputy County Administrator-Committee Staff
Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator
Robert Rogers, District I Staff
Jill Ray, District II Staff
Lindy Lavender, District IV Staff
Mark Peterson , District Attorney
Robin Lipetzky, Public Defender
Philip F. Kader, Chief Probation Officer
Mike Casten, Undersheriff
Matthew Schuler, Assistant Sheriff
Melvin Russell, Probation Manager
Vana Tran, Senior Management Analyst
Donte Blue, County Reentry Coordinator
Chrystine Robbins, Sheriff's Office
1. Introductions
Convene - 1:03 PM
2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this
agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes).
The Committee received public comment from:
1. Phil Kader regarding the designation of "Narcotics Officer of the Year" to
Deputy Probation Office Lori Militar
2. Harlan Grossman regarding the pending award of a Byrne Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) from the Board of State and Community Corrections.
3. APPROVE Record of Action from the January 26, 2015 meeting.
Approved as presented.
*** RECORD OF ACTION ***
Page 4 of 115
Vice Chair Federal D. Glover, Chair John Gioia
AYE: Chair John Gioia, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover
Passed
4. REVIEW and APPROVE fiscal year 2015/16 AB 109 budget recommendations for
integration into the fiscal year 2015/16 County Recommended Budget
for consideration by the Board of Supervisors, as recommended by the CCP-
Executive Committee.
The action before the Public Protection Committee today is to review and approve,
including any amendments, the fiscal year 2015/16 AB 109 budget submitted by the
CCP-Executive Committee. Once approved, staff will integrate the AB 109
budget into the fiscal year 2015/16 County Recommended Budget for consideration
by the Board of Supervisors. Currently, budget hearings are scheduled for April 21,
2015.
Approved as presented with the following direction to staff:
1. The County Administrator will facilitate a workgroup to review the budgets of
County departments and Community Based Organizations (CBOs).
Vice Chair Federal D. Glover, Chair John Gioia
AYE: Chair John Gioia, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover
Passed
5. APPROVE calendar year 2014 Public Protection Committee Annual Report for
submission to the Board of Supervisors and APPROVE calendar year 2015 Public
Protection Committee work plan;
PROVIDE direction to staff as appropriate.
Approved as presented with the following direction to staff:
1. Request that the Sheriff's Office integrate an update on the County Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP) concurrent with the scheduled April 2015 update on
County emergency preparedness and disaster response.
Chair John Gioia, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover
AYE: Chair John Gioia, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover
Passed
6. The next meeting is currently scheduled for March 9, 2015 at 1:00 PM.
7. Adjourn
Adjourned - 2:14 PM
Page 5 of 115
For Additional Information Contact: Timothy Ewell, Committee
Phone (925) 335-1036, Fax (925) 646-
timothy.ewell@cao.cccoun
The Public Protection Committee will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Public
Protection Committee meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a major
of members of the Public Protection Committee less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pi
Street, 10th floor, during normal business hours.
Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time.
Page 6 of 115
PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE 4.
Meeting Date:03/09/2015
Subject:Status Report on AB 109 Community Programs
Submitted For: David Twa, County Administrator
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: N/A
Referral Name: AB 109 IMPLEMENTATION
Presenter: Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County
Administrator
Contact: Lara DeLaney, (925)
335-1097
Referral History:
FY 2013-14
As directed by the Public Protection Committee (PPC) at their March 8, 2013 meeting, RFPs for
the AB 109 Community Programs for FY 2013-14 were issued for the following:
Employment Support and Placement Services $ 2,000,000
Short and Long-Term Housing Access $ 500,000
Peer and Mentoring Support $ 200,000
Planning for (3) Reentry Resource Centers $ 120,000
Upon conclusion of the procurement process, the following contracts were awarded by the Board
of Supervisors at their May 21, 2013 meeting:
Rubicon Programs Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,400,000, to provide employment
support and placement services in West and East County.
1.
Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay in an amount not to exceed $600,000, to provide
employment support and placement services in Central County
2.
Shelter Inc., in an amount not to exceed $500,000, to provide short and long-term housing
access countywide.
3.
Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $200,000, to provide
peer and mentoring services through sub-contracts with Men and Women of Purpose, Center
for Human Development, and Brighter Beginnings.
4.
Further The Work, LLC., in an amount not to exceed $40,000, to provide planning services
for a Reentry Resource Center for West County.
5.
Emerald HPC, International in an amount not to exceed $80,000, to provide planning
services for Central and East County.
6.
A follow-on contract with the Contra Costa Crisis Center to provide for the development and
update of a Reentry Resource Guide was also developed for FY 13-14 in the amount of $15,000.
Page 7 of 115
update of a Reentry Resource Guide was also developed for FY 13-14 in the amount of $15,000.
In addition, the final FY 2013-14 budget for AB 109 Public Safety Realignment included an
allocation in the amount of $80,000 for reentry legal services for the Central County AB 109
population. Subsequent to the budget authorization, the County Administrator’s Office issued an
RFQ and after conclusion of the procurement process, the Board of Supervisors authorized a
contract with Bay Area Legal Aid on September 17, 2013 in the amount of $80,000.
FY 2014-15
For FY 2014-15, the Public Protection Committee directed staff at its February 24, 2014 meeting
to extend the contracts for employment support and placement services as well as for short and
long-term housing access, and Central County legal services with the contractors selected for FY
13-14. The PPC also directed that the $200,000 for the Peer and Mentoring Program be divided
equally between the existing sub-contractors, Men and Women of Purpose, Center for Human
Development, and Brighter Beginnings ($66,667 each).
On the recommendation of the PPC, on May 13, 2014 the Board of Supervisors authorized
contracts to implement the recommendations of the reentry center/network planning processes for
West, Central & East County. Contracts were awarded to the following:
West County Reentry Resource Center
Rubicon Programs, Inc.:$800,000
Network Management Team
Kathy Moniz-Narasaki, Network
Manager $107,000
Patrick Mims, Field Ops. Coordinator,
Central $82,700
Vernon Williams III, Field Ops.
Coordinator, East $82,700
Eugene Jackson, Field Ops.
Coordinator, East $83,200
sub-total $355,600
Network Service Providers
JFK University $66,000
Brighter Beginnings/Leadership $66,000
Prepare My Sheep $65,000
New Dream Life Center $115,000
Reach Fellowship:
Employment-Education Liaison $53,500
Men and Women of Purpose:
Employment-Education Liaison $50,900
sub-total $416,400
Prepare My Sheep—equipment (FY
13-14)$52,330
Page 8 of 115
Financial Summary
A financial summary report of the FY 2013-14 and FY 2014-15 AB 109 Community Programs is Attachment A
Attachment A.
Program Implementation
The County Reentry Coordinator and the Senior Deputy CAO assigned to the Community
Programs project have held AB 109 Administrator meetings, met one-on-one with contractors,
and participated in Case Conference meetings in order to assist with the management and
performance of the contractors.In addition, contractors have been required to provide Quarterly
Summary Reports.
Issues of concern that have been identified by staff and contractors include:
Implementation of the service referral process: The process by which referrals are made to the
contracted service providers has required the development of information technology solutions, in
consultation with service providers, and the training of AB 109 Probation Officers, both of which require
time and staff resources. The implementation of the Plans for the West County Reentry Resource Center and
the Central/East Networks have impacted the established processes and have required additional time and
resources for development.
Lower than anticipated number of referrals in some cases: Contracts were initially developed with
client referral numbers that did not met expectations. In a few cases, client referrals were duplicated among
service providers. The Public Protection Committee has directed that the service population be extended to
non-AB 109 clients. A Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) Work Group has been established to work
through the referral and enrollment processes for this population extension.
The need to improve or increase client engagement strategies : Contractors are working with
Probation and CAO staff to increase client “engagement” by developing strategies to better “market”
available services. Strategies in progress include the development of brochures and flyers, hosting “service
fairs,” increasing the presence of service providers at Probation offices, and facilitating AB 109 Probation
Officer knowledge of program content and capacity. There is also an increased emphasis on Pre-release
relationship building and service delivery, so that clients are more familiar with programs and program staff
and interested in engagement.
The need to improve data management services across/among providers: Contractors identified
a need for client case management resources, effective intake and assessment forms, and the ability to
exchange information more easily. The work that our program evaluation consultants, Resource Development
Associates, are currently performing is anticipated to address this issue more fully. The East-Central Network
of Services has helped to address this problem by providing resources from FY 13-14 one-time funds for
database management support, procurement of ServicePoint client management software, and aligning
expectations around performance reporting.
Insufficient resources provided for housing : As anticipated, the amount of funds provided for the
establishment of transitional housing has proven to be insufficient to the demand. Furthermore, the
transitional housing provider identified in the East-Central Plan has not been able to identify housing
resources. At its January 2015 meeting, the Public Protection Committee directed staff to proceed with an
alternative housing provider. An amendment to the contract with SHELTER Inc. is being proposed to the
Board of Supervisors for their Mar. 3, 2015 agenda for $115,000 to provide additional transitional housing in
East and Central County.
The need to plan for service provision in the future: Contractors have expressed a need to know
whether contracts will be extended for longer periods of time so that they can adequately prepare their
budgets and allocate required resources. When RFPs are issued for FY 16-17, consideration should be given
to multi-year contracts.
Referral Update:
Page 9 of 115
This issue is listed on the Community Corrections Partnership agenda for action on Friday, March
6, 2015. The intent is to forward the action of the CCP to the PPC for review and approval;
however, at the time of publishing this agenda packet, there is no action of the CCP to include.
Staff will present the actions of the CCP to the Committee at the March 9, 2015 meeting.
The March 6, 2015 agenda packet for the CCP is available here:
http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/35493
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
1. EXTEND the Employment, Housing, and Legal Services contracts for an additional fiscal year
(FY 15-16) so contractors have sufficient time to perform on the contracts and sufficient
performance data is developed to evaluate program efficacy. Staff is developing a “Contractor
Compliance Checklist,” and is meeting with the individual contractors to ensure satisfactory
progress in reaching contract goals.
2. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Community Corrections Partnership has referred to its Community
Advisory Board for input, a review of the Mentoring/Family Reunification Services ($200k)
contract allocations for FY 14-15 and directed the CAB to return to the CCP with a
recommendation.
3. APPROVE recommendations of the East/Central County Network Manager to reallocate
program allocations in the East Central Network System of Services budget, with no change to
the total budget amount of $800,000, for fiscal year 2015/16.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
No additional fiscal impact.
Attachments
Attachment A - FY 2013/14 & 2014/15 Community Programs Summary
Network Manager Letter to the CCP
Page 10 of 115
Page 11 of 115
Page 12 of 115
Kathy M. Narasaki, Network Manager Cell: 925.270.8392 kathy@reentry.cccounty.us
50 Douglas Dr., Suite 201 Martinez, CA 94553 www.contracosta.ca.gov/reentrynetwork
East and Central Contra Costa County
Reentry Network Management Team
DATE: February 25, 2015
TO: Community Corrections Partnership
FROM: Kathy Narasaki, Network Manager
SUBJECT: East-Central Network Budget Modification Recommendations for FY 15-16
RECOMMENDATION:
Upon review of the East-Central Network System of Services budget of $800,000 in AB 109
funding and consideration of the additional funding needs for Transitional Housing, as Network
Manager I am recommending modifications of the service provider contracts for FY 2015-16.
A detailed breakdown of these recommended modifications will be provided at the Community
Corrections Partnership meeting on March 6, 2015.
Respectively submitted,
Kathy Narasaki
Page 13 of 115
PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE 5.
Meeting Date:03/09/2015
Subject:REVIEW OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA (CSA) P-6
Submitted For: David Twa, County Administrator
Department:County Administrator
Referral No.: N/A
Referral Name: REVIEW OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA (CSA) P-6
Presenter: Timothy Ewell, 5-1036 Contact: Timothy Ewell, 5-1036
Referral History:
Formation and Structure:
On July 19, 1983, the Board of Supervisors approved formation of County Service Area (CSA)
P-6 to provide for additional financial resources for the provision of police protection services in
the unincorporated area of the County with the exception of the Kensington Community Services
District. CSA P-6 is a special district authorized by the County Service Area Law commencing
with Government Code section 25210 and is governed by the County Board of Supervisors. The
District is administered by the Sheriff's Office with legal counsel provided by County Counsel
and Clerk of the Board services provided by Contra Costa County.
Funding:
The District is funded by two primary revenue sources:
1. Ad Valorem Property Tax: A portion of the 1% ad valorem property taxes paid by landowners
residing within the boundaries of the District is allocated to the District to fund operations. The
percent share of the 1% ad valorem property tax varies depending on the Tax Rate Area (TRA) in
which the parcel resides within the boundaries of the District. TRA information is publicly
available on the Auditor-Controller's website. For fiscal year 2013/14, the District received $4.9
million. Traditionally, a portion of the ad valorem revenue has been budgeted in the Sheriff's
Office operating budget to fund unincorporated County Patrol operations.
2. Special Tax revenue from Zones: On August 11, 1992, the Finance Committee of the Board of
Supervisors recommended and the full Board approved a policy update to expand current tax
policy effective in the East County area of CSA P-6 to the entire CSA P-6. The policy provides
for the establishment of a Zone (as authorized by Government Code section 25217) within CSA
P-6 as a condition of approval (COA) on new subdivisions within the unincorporated area. On
August 8, 1995, the tax policy was modified by the Board to create different conditions of
Page 14 of 115
approval for major and minor subdivisions with regard to funding for police services.
Under the new policy, minor subdivisions (those proposed to develop four or fewer lots) would
pay a one-time police mitigation fee of $1,000. Major subdivisions (those proposed to develop
five or more lots) would continue to have a COA requiring establishment of a CSA P-6 zone.
Currently, there are 115 active zones in the County, which generated $1.6 million in FY 2013/14.
Establishment and Administration Process:
The following steps illustrate the process for establishing and administering a CSA P-6 Zone.
Note that this process has changed slightly over the years.
Step 1: DCD sets condition of approval to establish a Special Police Services Tax District for
major subdivisions of five or more lots. Sheriff’s Office assigns a zone number. The proposed
special tax district would fund an increase in the level of police protection services that is
provided in the unincorporated area.
Step 2: The Board adopts a resolution of intent to form a new zone, as required by Government
Code Section 25217, subdivision (b). The formation of the zone provides the County of Contra
Costa with a method of financing an increased level of police protection services to the area
within the zone if the tax measure is approved by voters at the ballot. The resolution includes
information regarding the name and boundaries of the zone, the different level of services to be
provided, and the method by which the increased level of service is to be funded. The resolution
also directs the Clerk of the Board to publish and mail notice of a public hearing regarding the
proposed zone formation.
Step 3: The Board opens the hearing on the proposed zone formation. If at the conclusion of that
public hearing the Board determines that more than 50% of the total number of voters residing
within the proposed zone have filed written objections to the formation, Government Code
section 25217.1, subdivision (b)(1) would require the Board to determine that a majority protest
exists and to terminate the proceedings. If there is no majority protest and the Board elects to
proceed with the formation of the zone, the Board adopts a second resolution establishing the zone
of County Service Area P-6 subject to voter approval of a special tax to fund police protection
services within the zone.
Step 4: The Board opens a second public hearing to consider the approval of, and adopt, the
special tax ordinance which would authorize the levy of a special tax for police protection
services on all taxable parcels in the area of the zone if a special tax ballot measure is approved by
a two-thirds majority of the registered voters in the zone area, pursuant to Government Code
section 50077, subdivision (a). If the Board adopts the ordinance, adoption of a third resolution
sets forth appropriate ballot language, and directs the County Clerk, Elections Division to conduct
the election.
Step 5: Following the election, the Board accepts the canvass of votes for the special election,
showing that the measure for police services in the zone passed or failed. If the measure passes,
the project developer will have complied with the condition of approval for the project. When all
conditions of approval are met, the developer will be able to record the Final Map for the
subdivision.
Page 15 of 115
Step 6: In July of each calendar year, the Board sets the special tax levy for the fiscal year for
police services Zones in County Service Area P-6 based on the April CPI-U indicator released by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The action fixes the tax rates per parcel in the P-6 Zones as
outlined in their respective ordinances. The taxes are on the annual Property Tax Roll. The
Sheriff’s Office adds newly authorized zones to the tax roll and initiates the creation of the fund
with the Auditor-Controller’s Office.
Referral Update:
On October 7, 2014, the Board of Supervisors referred to the Public Protection Committee a
general review of County Service Area P-6. Since that time, the County Administrator's Office
has been working with multiple departments to collect data and review the current administration
of CSA P-6. Today's report will include a general overview of CSA P-6, including its history,
administration and funding. Staff has invited representatives from the Sheriff's Office and
Conservation and Development Department to attend the meeting to assist the Committee with the
discussion. Following the discussion, staff is requesting that the Committee provide direction
regarding next steps for this referral. Due to the breadth of this topic, staff has integrated this
discussion into the Committee's annual work plan, tentatively planning to return at the May 2015
meeting for follow-up.
The following attachments are included to support information referenced in the staff report:
Attachment A - Government Code Sections
The attachment includes:
Government Code Sections 25210-25217.4 regarding County Service Areas
Government Code Sections 50075-50077.5 regarding Voter-Approved Special Taxes
Government Code Sections 53978 regarding Procedures for Voter Authorization of Special
Tax
Attachment B – Board Actions Establishing Current CSA P-6 Tax Policy
The attachment includes:
1992 Board action amending the County policy on the establishment of special taxes for
police services from subdivisions in East County to apply to the entire unincorporated area
(P-6)
1995 Board action establishing a one-time police services mitigation fee on minor
subdivisions of four lots or less to replace the annual tax of $225 per lot.
Attachment C – Sample Zone Formation Case File - Zone 2903
The attachment includes:
Conditions of Approval (COA) for Major Subdivision 9174 (See Condition 14 Police
Service District.)
Board action to form a new P-6 Zone
Board hearing and adoption of resolution to establish P-6 Zone subject to voter approval
Board hearing and adoption of ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax for police
protection services in the P-6 Zone, and a resolution authorizing an election in the P-6 Zone
Board accepts the canvass of votes
Sheriff’s recommendation to Board to set the special tax levy for police services in P-6
Zones for the fiscal year
Attachment D - Sample Condition of Approval Language for Major and Minor
Subdivisions
Page 16 of 115
The following are informational attachments that are included for reference if needed during the
discussion:
FY 2013/14 CSA P-6 Zone Financial Summary
CSA P-6 Formation Documents
CSA P-6 Zone Map District I
CSA P-6 Zone Map District II
CSA P-6 Zone Map District III
CSA P-6 Zone Map District IV
CSA P-6 Zone Map District V
Patrol Beat Map - Bay Station
Patrol Beat Map - Delta Station
Patrol Beat Map - Muir Station
Patrol Beat Map - Valley Station
DRAFT CSA P-6 Zone Establishing Documents: Volume I - Zones 200-1201 (access
here:http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/35525)
DRAFT CSA P-6 Zone Establishing Documents: Volume II - Zones 1500-1804 (access
here:http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/35526)
Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s):
1. ACCEPT a report on County Service Area P-6; and
2. PROVIDE direction to staff on next steps.
Fiscal Impact (if any):
No fiscal impact. Todays discussion is informational only.
Attachments
Attachment A - Government Code Sections
Attachment B – Board Actions Establishing Current CSA P-6 Tax Policy
Attachment C – Sample Zone Formation Case File - Zone 2903
Attachment D - Sample Condition of Approval Language for Major and Minor Subdivisions
FY 2013/14 CSA P-6 Zone Financial Summary
CSA P-6 Formation Documents
CSA P-6 Zone Map District I
CSA P-6 Zone Map District II
CSA P-6 Zone Map District III
CSA P-6 Zone Map District IV
CSA P-6 Zone Map District V
Patrol Beat Map - Bay Station
Patrol Beat Map - Delta Station
Patrol Beat Map - Muir Station
Patrol Beat Map - Valley Station
Page 17 of 115
Page 18 of 115
Page 19 of 115
Page 20 of 115
Page 21 of 115
Page 22 of 115
Page 23 of 115
Page 24 of 115
Page 25 of 115
Page 26 of 115
Page 27 of 115
Page 28 of 115
Page 29 of 115
Page 30 of 115
Page 31 of 115
Page 32 of 115
Page 33 of 115
Page 34 of 115
Page 35 of 115
Page 36 of 115
Page 37 of 115
Page 38 of 115
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPROVED PERMIT
APPLICANT Camp & Camp Associates
2540 Camino Diablo, Ste. 201
Walnut Creek CA 94596
APPLICATION NO. SD07 -9174
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 166- 010 -005
ZONING DISTRICT: R -10 and R -20
OWNER: Park Development Group APPROVED DATE: April 21, 2008
1196 Boulevard Way
Walnut Creek Ca 94595 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2008
This matter not having been appealed within the time prescribed by law, a VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE 5.92 ACRES INTO 9 LOTS in the LAFAYETTE area is hereby
GRANTED, subject to the attached conditions.
DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP
Community Development Director
By: --
CATHERINE KUTSURIS
Deputy Zoning Administrator
Unless otherwise provided, YOU HAVE 36 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS
PERMIT TO FILE THE FINAL MAP.
PLEASE NOTE THE EFFECTIVE DATE, as no further notification will be sent by this office.
Page 39 of 115
FINDINGS, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP - COUNTY FILE #SD079174 AS APPROVED BY THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON APRIL 21, 2008
A. Growth Management Performance Standards
1. Traffic: The project will generate an estimated 32 -40 additional AM and PM peak hour
trips. Therefore, the applicant is not required to prepare a traffic report pursuant to the
1988 Measure C requirements as the threshold is 100 or more peak hour trips.
2. Drainage and Flood Control: The conditions of approval for this permit requires that
the applicant to collect and convey all stormwaters entering or originating within the
project to an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural or manmade water
course. The Final Map may not be filed until the collect and convey requirements and
improvements have been met. The site lies within Flood Zone "C ".
3. Water and Waste Disposal: The project site is within the East Bay Municipal Utility
District and Contra Costa County Central Sanitation District service areas. The Sanitary
district has indicated that capacity exists to support the development, however the
project proponent must comply with the regulations and requirements of the Districts
prior to construction permit approvals. Conditions of approval will ensure the project
has water service.
4. Fire Protection: Prior to the approval of a final map, the applicant is required to
demonstrate that all of the proposed development is in compliance with the ordinances
and regulations of the Fire District and obtain approval by the Contra Costa County
Fire Protection District prior to the commencement of construction permits.
5. Public Protection: The Growth Management Element Standard is 155 square feet of
Sheriff facility station per 1,000 population. The small population increase associated
with this project is not significant. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the applicant is
required to establish a police services tax district to mitigate the impacts of the
development on police services.
6. Parks & Recreation: The proposed project will have a minor cumulative effect on
demand for park and recreation facilities, and is subject to payment of park dedication
fees in the amount of $7,238 per residential parcel to mitigate impacts.
B. Approval of Tentative Map
Required Finding: The County Planning Agency shall not approve a tentative map
unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its
design and improvement, is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans
required by law.
Page 40 of 115
Conditions of Approval 2 SD079174
Project Finding. The project is consistent with the various elements of the General
Plan. The land use designation is SL, which allows for low density single family
residential development. The tentative map provides for 9 new residential lots on a
5.92 -acre parcel, which complies with the mid to high range density requirement.
Required Finding: The County Planning Agency shall not approve a tentative map
unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision fulfills construction requirements.
Project Finding: Public Works requires that the project comply with collect and
convey regulations and design standards for construction of private roads.
Improvements that include Reliez Valley Road) The County Geologist stated that the
site is feasible for construction from a geologic standpoint with the implementation of
the geologic mitigation measures and conditions of approval that is included below.
Buildings must comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
General
1. This approval is based upon the exhibits received by the Community
Development Department as shown on the revised Vesting Tentative Map
and Site Development dated July 16, 2007 and as generally shown on the
revised Stormwater Control Plan dated September 4, 2007 and Civil Plans
dated June 23, 2006.
The approval is also based upon the following reports:
A. Final Tree Report prepared by Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist dated
January 16, 2006 and Tree inventory and removal sheet L -2 submitted
on July 16, 2007.
B. Revised Stormwater Control Report prepared by Terra Firma, Inc. dated
September 4, 2007.
C. Slope Density Map prepared by Terra Firma, dated received on July 16,
2007.
D. Darwin Myers Associates, Geologic Peer Review and Recommendation
third review letter dated August 2, 2007.
E. Preliminary Geotechnical and Geology Investigation on Residential
development by Neil O. Anderson and Associates, dated February 5,
2006.
Page 41 of 115
Conditions of Approval 3 SD079174
F. Design Guidelines prepared for "Summer Hills Park" subdivision as
amended on April 21, 2008.
2. Applicant Indemnification of County — Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66474.9, the applicant (including the subdivider or any agent
thereof) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the
Agency (the County) or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set
aside, void, or annul, the Agency's approval concerning this subdivision
map application, which action is brought within the time period provided for
in Section 66499.37. The County will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense.
3. Compliance Report — At least 30 days prior to filing a final map or issuance
of grading permit, which ever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a report
on compliance with the conditions of approval with this permit for the
review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The fee for this
application is a deposit of $1,000 that is subject to time and materials costs.
Should staff costs exceed the deposit, additional fees will be required.
A. Except for those conditions administered by the Public Works
Department, the report shall list each condition followed by a description
of what the applicant has provided as evidence of compliance with that
condition.
B. Unless otherwise indicated, the applicant will be required to demonstrate
compliance with the condition of this report prior to filing the final map.
Residential Design
4. _ a. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall provide for
the review the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator a color
and materials sample including building roof materials accompanied
with architectural drawings showing detailed floor plans, Sections, and
elevations with finish. The materials and colors submitted shall provide
sufficient variations and contrast of colors to enhance the residential
design of the home within the subdivision. The color and materials
chosen shall also serve to limit the visual impacts of the new
subdivision on neighboring residences. A fee may be administered for
this review.
The guide for development shall be the Single family Residential
Districts of (R -10 and R -20), subject to the Zoning Administrator's
review and approval at the time of issuance of building permits. All
residential structures shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for
Page 42 of 115
Conditions of Approval 4 SD079174
review and approval to ensure consistency with this permit and the
Design Guidelines.
b. Design Guidelines applicable to the subdivision shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Map. The guidelines as recorded shall be
detailed and specify all language as provided within the design
guideline document submitted to the County on May 14, 2007 and as
amended by the Zoning Administrator on April 21, 2008 . (Mitigation
Measure AES Ib)
Three off street guest parking spaces shall be provided for all lots.
Providing four spaces shall be encouraged.
Architectural building plans shall be subject to the review and
approval of the Zoning Administrator prior to any building
permits.
The homes proposed on lots 1 -3 shall not exceed 3,900 square
feet, plus a maximum of 600 square feet for a three car garage
Lots 4 and 9 shall be stepped/tiered homes with grade
Avoid two story high vertical walls on the down slope lots
No 3 -story structures are allowed.
The residential design for homes on lots 1 -3 shall provide additional
design considerations to improve the view of the residence from Reliez
Valley Road.
Creation of Homeowners Association and CC &R's
5. Creation of a Home Owners Association (HOA) — Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions (CC &R's) shall be submitted for review and approval of
the Zoning Administrator prior to filing the Final Map. This document
shall provide for the creation of a homeowners association that is
responsible for maintenance of the private streets, scenic development areas
with required storm water control measures, special road paving, drainage,
and retaining walls, landscaping/common areas.
During long term operation of the storm drain system and maintaining the
storm water control measure implemented, the HOA shall be responsible
for hiring a contractor to complete regular maintenance activities, such as
de- silting culverts and removing vegetation and debris from the storm drain
inlet, to assure that facilities are operating at their design capacities and to
prevent on -site and downstream flooding problems.
The CC &R's and Design Guidelines shall be recorded concurrently with
the Final Map.
Page 43 of 115
Conditions of Approval 5 SD079174
Alternative Street Names
6. Submittal of Altemative Street Names — At least 30 days prior to filing a
Final map, three alternative street names for the proposed private road shall
be submitted for the review and approval of the Community Development
Department, Graphics Section (335- 1270). The Final Map cannot be
certified by the Community Development Department without the
approved street names.
Deed Disclosures
7. Prior to the filing of the Final Map the applicant shall provide the following
deed disclosures for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator:
Reference and Details describing the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC &R's); establishment for the Homeowners
Association and responsibilities;
The deed disclosure shall incorporate a disclosure to future home
buyers disclosing the scenic /restricted development easements and
its limits (limits shall include no development of any structures,
buildings, grading, fencing or removal of trees and landscaping) and
ownership, maintenance of the storm water control measures, and
maintenance of any entrance signs or perimeter fences; (Mitigation
Measure Geo /Soils VI a4)
Language shall also be included detailing the Design Guidelines
applicable to the lots within this subdivision;
Language shall be provided notifying future property owners
acknowledging the geotechnical report, title and firm, calling
attention to approved recommendations and remediation/corrective
grading and noting that the report is available from the seller.
East Bay Municipal Utility District
8. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant shall provide evidence,
for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator, that water service is
available to all residential lots proposed (i.e. EBMUD will serve letter or
water main extension agreement).
Perimeter Fencing
9. Prior to the issuance of any building permit the developer shall provide the
design, color and location of any project sign and picket fence with
columns or other entrance features for the review and approval of the
Page 44 of 115
Conditions of Approval 6 SD079174
Zoning Administrator. Fence design shall mitigate, to the greatest extent
possible, any visual impacts (including headlights from cars on the onsite
private road) and noise impacts (including traffic noise from the private
road) of the subdivision on the neighboring property of Mr. Kevin Lewis,
at 1960 Reliez Valley Road, Lafayette, CA 94549. At least ten days prior
to Zoning Administrator approval of the fence design, the applicant shall
provide a copy of the fence plans to Mr. Lewis and provide an opportunity
for Mr. Lewis to submit comments on the plan (as it affects the Lewis
property) to the Zoning Administrator. No variances have been granted,
therefore, the maximum height of a fence - retaining wall combination is
limited to 6 -feet maximum.
Debris Recovery Program
10. At least 15 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building
permit the developer shall demonstrate compliance with the debris
recovery program, which requires at least 50 percent of the jobsite debris
generated by construction projects of 5,000 square feet or greater to be
recycled or otherwise diverted from landfill disposal.
Phasing
11. The applicant may submit a phasing plan for review and approval of the
Zoning Administrator and the Public Works Department, if desired.
Affordable Housing
12. Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit, the developer shall
pay an in -lieu fee of $25,555.29 for each parcel for a total amount of
230,000 for all nine parcels pursuant to the Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance.
Payment of Any Supplemental Application Fees that is due
13. This application is subject to an initial application fee of ($7,663. 00), which
was paid with the application submittal, plus time and material costs if the
application review expenses exceed 100% of the initial fee. Any additional
fee due must be paid within 60 days of the permit effective date or prior to
use of the permit whichever occurs first. The fees include costs through
permit issuance plus five working days for file preparation. The applicant
may obtain current costs by contacting the project planner. If additional fees
are owed, a bill will be sent to the applicant shortly after permit issuance.
Page 45 of 115
Conditions of Approval 7 SD079174
Police Service District
14. Election for Establishment of a Police Services District to Augment Police
Services — The owner of the property shall participate in the provision of
funding to maintain and augment police services by voting to approve a
special tax for the 9 residential parcels created by this subdivision approval.
The tax shall be per parcel annual amount (with appropriate future CPI
adjustment) then established at the time of voting by the Board of
Supervisors. The election to provide for the tax shall be completed prior to
filing the Final Map. The property owner shall be responsible for paying
the cost of holding the election, payable at the time the election is requested
by the owner. Allow a minimum of three to four months for processing.
Fire Protection District
15. _ Prior to the approval of a final map, the applicant is required to demonstrate
that all of the proposed development is located within one and one -half
miles of a fire station, or that development within the project that is more
than one and one -half miles from a fire station shall be required to provide
automatic fire sprinkler systems.
IF the project requires fire sprinkler system then a deed disclosure for
each new residential lot shall be recorded with the Final Map. This
disclosure shall indicate that
The proposed structure has been designed with automatic interior fire -
suppression sprinkler system that meets the design standards of the
Consolidated Fire Protection District.
Restrictions on Development of Sales Model Units If Implemented
16. Prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of sale model
units, the applicant shall provide documentation evidencing compliance
with the requirements of the Water Conservation in New Developments
Ordinance (Chapter 82 -26). However, all sales model units shall be
required to comply with the improvement standards and reporting
requirements of the Water Conservation in New Developments Ordinance.
Final Landscape Plan
17. a. Prior to issuance of grading permits or building permits for residential
development of each lot, whichever occurs first, a Final Landscape Plan
that has been prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be
submitted for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator and
shall be in compliance with the County Water Conservation Landscape
Page 46 of 115
Conditions of Approval 8 SD079174
Ordinance 82 -26 and shall be installed prior to occupancy of the
building permit for that lot.
At least ten days prior to Zoning Administrator approval of the Final
Landscape Plan, the applicant shall provide a copy of the proposed
landscaping plan to Mr. Lewis and provide an opportunity for Mr.
Lewis to submit comments on the plan (as it affects the Lewis Property)
to the Zoning Administrator. The plan shall include
landscape /irrigation plans that are full sized and in color that will
include plant colors, locations of signs, and retaining walls. Trees to be
provided along the Lewis property line within the scenic restricted
development area shall be a minimum of 26 gallons in size and placed
to provide additional screening of the private road from the Lewis
property. The landscape plan shall provide for the protection in place,
to the extent possible, of the trees located within the Scenic Restricted
Development Area on Lot 9 (including Tree Numbers 106 -114 & 124-
139), as identified on the Tree Removal and Preservation Plan (Sheet
L -2). Included with the final landscape plan shall be colors and
elevations of any and all signage associated with the project.
b. The landscaped area between the entry roadway and the Lewis property
to the east (APN # 166- 010 -032) shall be moved from Lot 9 to the
common area and maintained through the homeowner's association.
c. Landscaping between the entry road and the Lewis property should
occur directly following completion of the construction of the roadway.
Air Quality
18. _ Prior to the issuance of a grading or building the applicant shall show under
the "General Notes" on all plans the dust control measures and construction
equipment stated below for the review and approval of the Zoning
Administrator to ensure these measures have been incorporated into the
construction plans:
Water the active construction site at least twice daily.
Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or
require all trucks to maintain at least two feet (2ft.) of freeboard.
Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soils, sand and other materials
that can be blown by the wind daily
Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil
stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging
areas at construction sites.
Sweep daily with water sweepers all paved access roads, parking
areas and staging areas at construction sites.
Page 47 of 115
Conditions of Approval 9 SD079174
Sweep streets daily (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil
material is carried onto adjacent streets.
Hydroseed disturbed areas as quickly as possible or apply (non-
toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.
Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non- toxic) soil binders
to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.).
Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph.
Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt
runoff to public roadways.
Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
Install temporary "No Construction Parking or Stopping" signs
along the Reliez Valley Road frontage of the adjacent parcel to the
north (the Lewis Property). No construction staging operations
shall take place within the public Reliez Valley Road right of way.
Mitigation Measure — Air IIIb)
Construction equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained in
accordance with manufacturer's specifications
All diesel engines shall use ultra -low sulfur diesel fuel
Unnecessary idling of construction equipment and trucks shall be
prohibited. Equipment and trucks shall not be allowed to sit idling
for more than five (5) minutes, except at initial startup.
All diesel engines used in connection with the project's
construction shall be post 1996 models.
On site power shall be used in order to minimize use of portable
generators.
A line for loading and unloading shall be designated on site not on
Reliez Valley Road. If the line is established on Reliez Valley Road
the location will be require the approval of the Public Works
Department and Community Development Department.
Trucks being unloaded or loaded, except under necessary
conditions to operate vehicles, shall turn off their engines.
Mitigation Measure- Air IIIc)
Biology
19. Prior to issuance of grading, demolition, or building permits including the
removal of trees the developer shall perform pre - construction bird surveys
and take follow up action. If land or brush clearing activities are performed
outside of the nesting season (i.e., between August 15 and January 31), no
Page 48 of 115
Conditions of Approval 10 SD079174
surveys for nesting migratory birds is warranted; no significant adverse
impact would occur. If land clearing activities are to commence during the
nesting season (i.e., between February 1 and August 15), a pre- construction
survey for nesting migratory birds should be conducted prior to the
destruction of any suitable nesting habitat. The survey area should include
all structures, trees, bushes and ruderal habitat on site and immediately
adjacent to the property. The purpose of the preconstruction surveys is to
determine if occupied nest are present within the zone of influence of the
project. The pre construction surveys shall be performed by someone who is
licensed and /or a certified biologist. Depending on the time of year and
results of the preconstruction surveys, it might be necessary that
construction activities commence within one week of the survey or at a
maximum within 30 days as recommended by a qualified biologist.
Mitigation Measure- Biological IV -d)
If any occupied passerine nests are found within the zone of influence,
grading and construction shall be prohibited within an adequate setback.
Typical setbacks around occupied nests are 300 feet for raptors and 100 feet
for passerines, depending on lines of site. The actual dimensions of each
buffer zone shall be determined by a qualified biologist in consultation with
the California Department of Fish and Game. Work within the setback
would have to be delayed until after the young have fledged, as determined
during surveys by a qualified biologist, or until after the nesting season as
described above. (Mitigation Measure — Biological IV -d)
Trees
20. _ Prior to issuance of grading, tree removal or building permits the developer
shall address the possibility that construction activity may damage those
trees to be preserved, the developer shall provide the County with a security
e.g. surety bond or cash deposit) to allow for replacement of trees intended
to be preserved that are damaged by construction activity. The planning
would involve up to (25) minimum 26 gallons in size in the vicinity of the
affected trees or equivalent planting contribution subject to the review and
approval of the Zoning Administrator. (Mitigation Measure BIO IVe)
The bond amount is based on the following terms:
The security shall provided shall be prepared by a licensed arborist
or landscape architect or landscape contractor
A labor and materials cost estimate for planting the twenty five (25)
26- gallon size trees and related irrigation improvements
An additional 20% inflation cost of the total amount
A $100 initial processing fee
Page 49 of 115
Conditions of Approval 11 SD079174
The security amount shall be retained for 36 months. At least 6 months prior
to the the applicant's request for the return of the security, the applicant's
arborist shall inspect the trees for any significant damage from construction
activity and submit a repot on the conclusions on the health to the
Community Development Department.
21. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first,
the developer or property owner shall submit a surety bond or cash deposit
for the tree planting and irrigation of at least nine (9) trees, minimum 26-
gallons in size. The plan shall be prepared by a licensed arborist or
landscape architect for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator.
The amount of the surety bond or cash deposit is the same as described
under condition of approval number 22. (Mitigation Measure BIO IVe)
22. At least 15 days prior to the issuance of grading, digging, building permits
or tree removal the developer shall hire a consulting arborist to discuss work
procedures and verify the protection of trees as recommended in the Final
Arborist Report prepared by Ed Brennan and dated received by the
Community Development Department on February 5, 2007 and as required
in these conditions of approval. Submittal of evidence shall include a copy
of the contract with the qualified arborist on site, the schedule and contact
information accompanied with any photographs and/or site plans
demonstrating compliance. (Mitigation Measure BIO IVe)
Cultural
23. If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are
encountered during project construction activities, all work within 50 feet of
the discovery shall be redirected and a qualified archaeologist shall be
contracted to evaluate the discoveries and make recommendations regarding
their potential significance and extent throughout the site. If such deposits
cannot be avoided, they shall be evaluated for their California and National
Register eligibility. If the deposits are not eligible, additional mitigation is
not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, they shall be avoided or adverse
project effects shall be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeologist's
evaluation, a report shall be prepared documenting the methods and results
of the research, and recommendations for additional mitigation. The report
should be submitted to the Contra Costa County Community Development
Department.
24. If paleontological resources are encountered during subsurface construction
activities, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected until a
qualified archaeologist/paleontologist can evaluate the finds and make
recommendations. If the paleontological resources are found to be
significant, they shall be avoided by project construction activities and
recovered by a qualified paleontologist. Upon completion of the recovery, a
Page 50 of 115
Conditions of Approval 12 SD079174
paleontological assessment shall be conducted by a qualified paleontologist
to determine if further monitoring for paleontological resources is required.
The assessment shall include: 1) the results of any geotechnical
investigation prepared for the project site; 2) specific details of the
construction plans for the project site; 3) background research; and 4)
limited subsurface investigation within the project site.
25. _ If human remains are encountered at any point during project construction,
work shall halt and the Contra Costa County Coroner shall be notified
immediately. In addition, the archaeological monitor shall be contacted to
examine the situation. If human remains are of Native American origin, the
Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24
hours of this identification. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
5097.98, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify a Native
American Most Likely Descendent to inspect the site and provide
recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated
grave goods.
Geology and Soils and Scenic Easement
26. _ Prior to the filing of the Final Map the developer shall record a restrictive
development easement for each lot. The easement shall be extended to cover
additional land and must encompass the proposed 8" Bench with V- Ditch.
The scenic easement shall be re- established by submittal of a revised
Vesting Tentative Map and deed disclosure prior to the filing of the map
however recorded concurrently with the final map and pursuant to the
review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. (Mitigation Measure
Geo /Soils VI A4)
27. _ Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit the developer's
geotechnical engineer shall be required to provide a corrective grading plan
that also address cut /fill pads, differential thickness lots, retaining or
perimeter walls, design of C.3 (Storm water Control) vegetated swales and
the specifics of the proposed project. The corrective grading plan shall
protect in place, to the extent possible, the trees located within the Scenic
Restricted Development Area on Lot 9 (including Tree Numbers 106 -114 &
124 -139), as identified on the Tree Removal and Preservation Plan (Sheet L-
2). (Mitigation Measure Geo /Soils VI A4)
28. At least 30 days prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for
each prospective lot, the developer shall submit a) cut/fill map b) detailed
grading and drainage plan, and c) update letter from the geotechnical
engineer providing comments on the consistency of the grading and
drainage plans with the recommendations in the geotechnical report, and
provide specific foundation design criteria and standards. The geotechnical
report should give consideration to special foundation recommendations for
Page 51 of 115
Conditions of Approval 13 SD079174
cut/fill transitions within buildings and expansive clay stone /non expansive
sandstone contacts beneath buildings, and address corrosivity of soils and
weathered bedrock. In addition, the developer shall also provide a map
showing the qualified consultant's interpretation of the distribution of fill on
the site for the review and approval of the County Geologist and Zoning
Administrator. (Mitigation Measure Geo /Soils VI A4)
A fee of $750 must be accompanied with the submittal of all geotechnical
documents requested for review and approval. (Mitigation Measure
Geo /Soils VI A4)
29. A deed disclosure shall be recorded concurrently with the filing of the Final
Map notifying future buyers of the detailed Geology and Soils report and
fees as indicated in the above mitigation. (Mitigation Measure Geo /Soils
VI A4)
Hydrology
30. During long term operation of the storm drain system, the project developer
shall be responsible for hiring a contractor to complete regular maintenance
activities, such as desilting culverts and removing vegetation and debris to
assure the facilities are operating at their design capacities and to prevent
on -site and downstream flooding problems. (Mitigation Measure VIII f -2)
31. At least 30 days prior to the issuance of grading permits an erosion control
plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Grading Section
of the Building Inspection Department and the review and approval of the
Zoning Administrator. The erosion control plan shall provide for the
following measures: (Mitigation Measure — Hydrology VIII f)
All grading excavation and filling shall be conducted during the dry
season (April 15 through October 15) only, and;
All areas of exposed soils shall be replanted to minimize erosion and
subsequent sedimentation;
After October 15, the grading permit shall allow only erosion control
work. Any modification to the above schedule shall be subject to the
review by the Grading Section of the Building Inspection
Department and the review and approval of the Zoning
Administrator.
Child Care
32. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay a fee of
400.00 per lot/unit toward childcare facility needs in the area as established
by the Board of Supervisors.
Page 52 of 115
Conditions of Approval 14 SD079174
Park Dedication
31 Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay a park
dedication fee in the amount of $7,238 per residential unit.
Haul Routes
34. _ Haul routes shall be generally limited to those areas of the site which are
proposed to be graded to avoid unnecessary scarring of hillsides. Hauling of
material through an approved scenic easement shall be precluded.
Construction and Noise
35. Construction Period Development Activity Restrictions — Contractor and/or
developer shall comply with the following construction noise, dust, litter,
and traffic control requirements: (Mitigation Measures — Noise XI d)
Noise generating construction activities including such things as power
generators shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday
through Friday and prohibited on the state and federal Holidays as listed
below.
A. All other construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:30
A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and shall be prohibited on
state and federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are
observed by the state or federal government as listed below:
New Year's Day (State and Federal)
Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal)
Washington's Birthday (Federal)
President's Day (State)
Cesar Chavez Day (State)
Memorial Day (State and Federal)
Independence Day (State and Federal)
Labor Day (State and Federal)
Columbus Day (State and Federal)
Veterans Day (State and Federal)
Thanks Giving Day (State and Federal)
Day after Thanksgiving (State)
Christmas Day (State and Federal)
For specific details on what day the State and Federal Holidays fall on,
please visit these web url's:
http://www.opm.gov/fedhol/2006.asp
htlp://www.edd.ca.gov/eddsthol.htm
Page 53 of 115
Conditions of Approval 15 SD079174
B. The project sponsor shall require their contractors and subcontractors
to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers that are in good
condition and shall locate stationary noise - generation equipment such
as air compressors and concrete pumpers as far away from existing
residences as possible.
C. The applicant shall make a good -faith effort to avoid interference with
existing neighborhood traffic flows.
D. Transporting of heavy equipment and trucks shall be limited to the
hours of 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and is
prohibited on state and federal holidays.
E. The site shall be maintained in an orderly fashion. Following the
cessation of construction activity, all construction debris shall be
removed from the site.
F. At least one week prior to commencement of grading, the applicant
shall post at the site and mail to the owners of property within 300 feet
of the exterior boundary of the project site, notice that construction
work will commence. The notice shall include a list of contact persons
with name, title, phone number and area of responsibility. The person
responsible for maintaining the list shall also be included. The list shall
be kept current at all times and shall consist of persons with authority
to indicate and implement corrective action in their area of
responsibility. The names of individuals responsible for noise and litter
control, tree protection, construction traffic and vehicles and the 24-
hour emergency number shall be expressly identified on the notice.
A copy of the notice shall be concurrently transmitted to the
Community Development Department. The notice shall be
accompanied by a list of names and addresses of the property owners
noticed, and a map identifying the area noticed.
G. Prior to approval of plans for a building or issuance of a grading
permit, the applicant shall provide a letter to the Community
Development Department indicating that he has fully disclosed these
requirements to all contractors and subcontractors within this project.
H. A dust and litter control program shall be submitted for review and
approval of the Zoning Administrator. Any violations of the approved
program or applicable ordinances, the developer shall not be allowed
to continue until an appropriate construction bond has been posted.
Page 54 of 115
Conditions of Approval 16 SD079174
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISION 07 -9174
The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of Title 8, Title 9, and Title 10 of the
County Ordinance Code. Any exceptions must be stipulated in these conditions of
approval. Conditions of Approval are based on the Vesting Tentative Map received by the
Community Development Department on July 16, 2007 and Revised Storm Water Control
Plan dated September 4, 2007.
COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO
RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP
General Requirements:
36. In accordance with Section 92 -2.006 of the Ordinance Code, this
subdivision shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Subdivision
Ordinance (Title 9). Any exceptions therefrom must be specifically listed
in this conditional approval statement. The drainage, road and utility
improvements outlined below shall require the review and approval of the
Public Works Department and are based on the revised Vesting Tentative
Map received by the Community Development Department on July 16,
2007.
37. Improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be
submitted to the Public Works Department, Engineering Services
Division, along with review and inspection fees, and security for all
improvements required by the County Ordinance Code for the conditions
of approval of this Subdivision. These plans shall include any necessary
traffic signage and striping plans for review by the Transportation
Engineering Division.
Frontage Improvements (Reliez Valley Road):
38. Applicant shall construct concrete curb, gutter, 5 foot wide sidewalk
width measured from face of curb), necessary longitudinal and traverse
drainage, street lighting, and pavement widening and transitions along the
frontage of Reliez Valley Road. Applicant shall construct face of curb 10
feet from the ultimate right of way line.
39. Applicant shall construct a street -type connection with minimum 20 -foot
radii curb returns in lieu of a standard driveway depression at the proposed
intersection of the on -site private road and Reliez Valley Road. Curb
ramps shall also be constructed at the returns and be constructed in
accordance with the current County Standard Plans.
Page 55 of 115
Conditions of Approval 17 SD079174
Private Roads (On- Site):
40. The applicant shall construct an on -site roadway system to meet current
County private road standards, with a minimum pavement width of 20 feet
measured from curb to curb). A minimum pavement width of 30 feet
shall be constructed at the project entrance and minimum of 24 feet at all
curves, as shown on the Vesting Tentative Map. An adequate turnaround
shall be constructed at the terminus of the on -site private road that will
accommodate passenger vehicles, delivery trucks, and any emergency
vehicles that may require access to the lots at the end of the roadway.
41. Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Department that the Fire District has reviewed and approved the on -site
roadway system and proposed turnaround.
42. Appiicant shall align the on -site private road with the existing intersection
of Stagecoach Drive and Reliez Valley Road. The final alignment and lane
configuration at the proposed intersection of the private road and Reliez
Valley Road shall be subject to the review and approval of the Traffic
Engineer of the Public Works Department.
Access to Adjoining Property:
Proof of Access
43. Applicant shall furnish proof to Public Works of the acquisition of all
necessary rights of way, rights of entry, permits and/or easements for the
construction of off -site, temporary or permanent, public and private road
and drainage improvements.
Encroachment Permit
44. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the County's
Application and Permit Center for construction of driveways, frontage
improvements, or other improvements within the right of way of Reliez
Valley Road.
Abutter's Rights of Access
45. Applicant shall relinquish abutter's rights of access along Reliez Valley
Road with the exception of the proposed private road intersection.
Sight Distance:
46. Applicant shall provide adequate sight distance at the private on -site road
intersection with Reliez Valley Road for a through traffic design speed of
Page 56 of 115
Conditions of Approval 18 SD079174
45 miles per hour. The applicant shall trim vegetation, as necessary, and
any new landscaping, walls, fences, signs, or any other obstructions must
be placed to maintain adequate sight distance.
Parking
47. Parking shall be prohibited on both sides of the on -site private road where
the curb to curb width is less than 28 feet. Parking shall also be prohibited
along horizontal curves. "No Parking" signs and pavement markings shall
be installed along these portions of the on -site roadway system, subject to
the review and approval of Public Works.
Pedestrian Facilities:
48. Curb ramps and driveways shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with current County standards. A detectable warning surface
e.g. truncated domes) shall be installed on all curb ramps. Adequate right
of way shall be dedicated at the curb returns to accommodate the returns
and curb ramps.
49. The applicant shall design all public and private pedestrian facilities in
accordance with Title 24 (Handicap Access) and the Americans with
Disabilities Act. This shall include all sidewalks, paths, driveway
depressions, and curb ramps.
Underground Utilities:
50. All new and existing utility distribution facilities shall be installed
underground.
Maintenance of Facilities:
51. A Homeowner's Association (HOA) or other acceptable entity other than
the County shall be formed to insure maintenance of all common areas,
the on -site private roadway system, any private street lights, public and
private landscaped areas, private drainage facilities, clean water facilities,
retaining walls, fences, etc. The County will not accept these facilities for
maintenance.
52. _ _ Property Owner(s) shall record a Statement of Obligation in the form of a
deed notification, to inform all future property owners of their legal
obligation to maintain the private facilities, and develop and enter into a
maintenance plan of operation agreement that will insure that all common
areas, the on -site private roadway system, any private street lights, public
and private landscaped areas, private drainage facilities, clean water
facilities, retaining walls, and fences throughout the site will be
Page 57 of 115
Conditions of Approval 19 SD079174
maintained, for the review and approval of the Public Works and
Community Development Departments.
Drainage Improvements:
Collect and Convey
53. Applicant shall collect and convey all storm water entering and/or
originating on this property without diversion and within an adequate
storm drainage facility, to an adequate natural watercourse having a
definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage
system which conveys the storm waters to an adequate natural
watercourse, in accordance with Division 914 of the Ordinance Code.
Miscellaneous Drainage Requirements:
54. Applicant shall design and construct all storm drainage facilities in
compliance with the Ordinance Code and Public Works Design Standards.
55. Applicant shall prevent storm drainage from draining across the
sidewalk(s) and driveway(s) in a concentrated manner.
56. A private storm drain easement, conforming to the width specified in
Section 914 - 14.004 of the County Ordinance Code, shall be dedicated
over any proposed storm drain line traversing the site.
Provision "C.3" of the NPDES Permit:
57. _ _ This project shall fully comply with the County's Stormwater
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, the Stormwater C.3
Guidebook, and the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control
Board. As part of these requirements, the applicant shall incorporate
Integrated Management Practices (IMPS) or Best Management Practices
BMPs) to the maximum extent practicable into the design of this project,
implement them, and provide for perpetual operation and maintenance for
all treatment IMP /BMPs..
58. A Stormwater Control Plan received on September 4, 2007 by the
Community Development Department was reviewed and determined to be
preliminarily complete. Although Stormwater Control Plan has been
determined to be preliminarily complete, it is subject to revision during the
preparation of improvement plans, as necessary, to bring it into full
compliance with C.3 stormwater requirements. The applicant shall submit
to the Public Works Department a final Stormwater Control Plan that has
been certified and stamped by a licensed Civil Engineer, Architect, or
Page 58 of 115
Conditions of Approval 20 SD079174
Landscape Architect for the review and approval of the Public Works
Department.
59. All construction plans (including, but not limited to, site, improvement,
structural, mechanical, architectural, building, grading and landscaping
plans) shall comply with the preliminarily approved Stormwater Control
Plan ( SWCP) or any subsequently revised SWCP, the County's
Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, the "C.3
Guidebook" and the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control
Board. All construction plans shall include details and specifications
necessary to implement all measures of the SWCP, subject to the review
and approval of the County. To insure conformance with the SWCP, the
applicant shall submit a completed "Construction Plan C.3 Checklist"
indicating the location on the construction plans of all elements of the
SWCP as described in the "C.3 Guidebook ".
60. Any proposed water quality features that are designed to retain water for
longer than 72 hours shall be subject to the review of the Contra Costa
Mosquito & Vector Control District.
61. Applicant shall collect and treat all storm water runoff from the required
frontage improvements in a treatment facility (IMPBMP) located on -site.
62. The applicant shall provide an Operation and Maintenance (O &M) Plan
for the review of the Public Works Department, and record an Operation
and Maintenance Agreement prior to the filing of the Final Map.
63. The applicant shall annex into any financing mechanisms (e.g.
Community Facilities District) formed to insure that all cost associated
with the perpetual Operation & Maintenance, administration and reporting
of these water quality features (including cost associated with all required
County administration and reporting) are paid for by the property owner(s)
that are or will be benefiting from this development.
Street Lights
64. Property owner shall apply for annexation to County Service Area L -100
Lighting District by submitting: a letter of request; a metes and bounds
description; and pay the current LAFCO fees, or apply for annexation to
another street light financing mechanism approved by the Public Works
Department. Annexation shall occur prior to filing of the Final Map. The
applicant shall be aware that this annexation process must comply with
State Proposition 218 requirements, which state that the property owner
must hold a special election to approve the annexation. This process may
take approximately 4 -6 months to complete. Annexation into a street light
Page 59 of 115
Conditions of Approval 21 SD079174
service area does not include the transfer of ownership and maintenance of
street lighting on private roads.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES):
65. The applicant shall be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and
procedures of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems
NPDES) for municipal, construction and industrial activities as
promulgated by the California State Water Resources Control Board, or
any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (San Francisco Bay
Region or Central Valley Region).
Compliance shall include developing long -term best management practices (BMP's) for
the reduction or elimination of storm water pollutants. The project design shall
incorporate, wherever feasible, the following long -term BMP's in accordance with the
Contra Costa County Clean Water Program for the site's storm water drainage:
Minimize the amount of directly connected impervious surface area.
Stencil advisory warnings on all catch basins and storm drains.
Construct concrete driveway weakened plane joints at angles to assist in directing
runoff to landscaped/pervious areas prior to entering the street curb and gutter.
Shared trash bins shall be sealed to prevent leakage, OR, shall be located within a
covered enclosure.
Prohibit or discourage direct connection of roof and area drains to storm drain
systems or through -curb drains.
Shallow roadside and on -site grassy swales.
Distribute public information items regarding the Clean Water Program to buyers.
Other alternatives, equivalent to the above, as approved by the Public Works
Department.
ADVISORY NOTES
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL. IT IS PROVIDED TO ALERT THE APPLICANT TO LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS
PROJECT MAY BE SUBJECT.
A. NOTICE OF 90 -DAY OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, DEDICATIONS,
RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE
APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT.
This notice is intended to advise the applicant that pursuant to Government Code Section
66000, et seq., the applicant has the opportunity to protest fees, dedications, reservations,
and /or exactions required as part of this project approval. The opportunity to protest is
limited to a 90 -day period after the project is approved.
Page 60 of 115
Conditions of Approval 22 SD079174
The ninety (90) day period in which you may protest the amount of any fee or the
imposition of any dedication, reservation, or other exaction required by this approved
permit, begins on the date this permit was approved. To be valid, a protest must be in
writing pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 and delivered to the Community
Development Department within 90 days of the approval date of this permit.
B. The applicant shall be required to comply with all rules, regulations and procedures of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) for municipal construction
and industrial activities as promulgated by the California State Water Resources Control
Board or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (San Francisco Bay — Region
II).
C. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game. It is
the applicant's responsibility to notify the Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 47,
Yountville, California 94599, of any proposed construction within this development that
may affect any fish and wildlife resources, per the Fish and Game Code.
D. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers. It is the
applicant's responsibility to notify the appropriate district of the Corps of Engineers to
determine if a permit is required, and if it can be obtained.
E. Comply with the Bridge /Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance requirements for the Central County
Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. These fees must be paid prior to
issuance of a building permit.
F. Comply with the Drainage Fee Ordinance requirements for Drainage Area 62, as adopted
by the Board of Supervisors. This fee must be paid prior to the filing of a Final Map.
G. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Central Sanitary District.
H. Comply with the requirements of the East Bay Municipal Utility District.
I. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire Protection District.
J. Comply with the requirements of the County Office of the Sheriff.
K. Comply with the requirements of the Building Inspection Department. Permits are required
prior to grading and construction.
The fees include but are not limited to the following:
Park Dedication $7,238 per residence.
Child Care $400 per residence.
Page 61 of 115
Conditions of Approval 23 SD079174
An estimate of the fee charges for each approved lot may be obtained by contacting the
Building Inspection Department.
L. Police Service District Costs and Necessary Processing Time The applicant is advised
that the tax for the police services district is currently set by the Board of Supervisors at
200 per parcel annually (with appropriate future Consumer Price Index (CPI)
adjustments). The annual fee is subject to modification by the Board of Supervisors in
the future. The current fee for holding the election is $800 and is also subject to
modification in the future. The applicable tax and fee amounts will be those established
by the Board at the time of voting. The applicant is advised that the election process
takes from 3 to 4 months and must be completed prior to recording the Final Map.
M. Vesting Tentative Map Rights —The approval of this vesting tentative map confers a
vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with ordinances,
policies, and standards in effect as of October 9, 2007, the date the vesting tentative map
application was accepted as complete by the Community Development Department. The
vested rights also apply to development fees, which the County has adopted by
ordinance. These fees are in addition to any other development fees, which may be
specified in the conditions of approval.
N. Although the Stormwater Control Plan has been determined to be preliminarily complete,
it remains subject to future revision, as necessary, during preparation of improvement
plans in order to bring it into full compliance with C.3 stormwater requirements. Failure
to update the SWCP to match any revisions made in the improvement plans may result in
a substantial change to the County approval, and the project may be subject to additional
public hearings. Revisions to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents
may also be required. This may significantly increase the time and applicant's costs
associated with approval of the application.
SD079174 -- 3/7/08
LCC
Page 62 of 115
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2013/194, initiating proceedings for the formation of a new zone, Zone 2903, within
County Service Area P-6, in the Lafayette area.
2. FIX a public hearing for June 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., on the formation of Zone 2903 within County Service Area P-6.
3. FIX a public hearing for June 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., to consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 2013-13, which
would authorize the levy of a special tax to augment funding for police protection services in proposed Zone 2903,
and to authorize submission of the ordinance to the voters for approval at the August 6, 2013 election.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the proposed Police Services Special Tax District is paid for by the developer of the
subdivision.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 05/14/2013 APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED
OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Christine Louie,
925-674-7787
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: May 14, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C.14
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation and Development Director
Date:May 14, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Resolution of Intention to Form Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6 in the Lafayette Area
Page 63 of 115
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision 9174 (Arbor View Estates Subdivision, County File #SD07-9174),
the developer of the property identified as 1964 Reliez Valley Road in the Lafayette area is required to establish a
Special Police Services Tax District for the 9-lot subdivision prior to recording the final map for the subdivision.
The proposed special tax district would fund an increase in the level of police protection services that is provided
in the unincorporated area of Lafayette.
Adoption of a resolution of intent to form a new tax district (Resolution No. 2013/194) is required by Government
Code Section 25217, subdivision (b), as the first step in forming the proposed zone, which will serve as the vehicle
to collect special taxes within the proposed zone if the tax measure is approved by the voters at the August 6,
2013, ballot. The resolution includes information regarding the name and boundaries of the zone, the different
level of services to be provided, and the method by which the increased level of service is to be funded. The
resolution also directs the Clerk of the Board to publish and mail notice of a public hearing regarding the proposed
zone formation. It is recommended that the Board set this hearing for 9:30 a.m. on June 4, 2013.
If at the conclusion of that public hearing the Board determines that more than 50% of the total number of voters
residing within the proposed zone have filed written objections to the formation, Government Code section
25217.1, subdivision (b)(1), would require the Board to determine that a majority protest exists and to terminate
the proceedings. The proposed police service district currently consist of a single 5.9-acre property owned by a
single entity, Arbor View Estates, LLC, who per the conditions of approval for the subdivision is required to
establish the police service district prior to recording the final map.
If there is no majority protest and the Board elects to proceed with the formation of the zone, a second public
hearing would be required to consider the approval of Ordinance No. 2013-13, pertaining to the proposed levy of a
special tax on the subject parcel within Zone 2903 for police protection services and submission of the measure to
the voters, pursuant to Government Code section 50077, subdivision (a). It is recommended that this hearing be
set at 9:30 a.m. on June 4, 2013, immediately following the hearing on the zone formation. If the Board thereafter
adopts Ordinance No. 2013-13, the tax measure would be submitted for placement on the August 6, 2013, ballot.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Board does not approve this item, Ordinance No. 2013-13 will not be adopted and formation of Special Tax
Zone 2903 will not occur, and the Special Tax District will not be established at the June 4, 2013 hearing.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2013/194
Exhibit A, Legal Description
Exhibit B, Map
Page 64 of 115
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 05/14/2013 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2013/194
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM ZONE 2903 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE LAFAYETTE AREA
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County proposes the formation of a new zone in the Lafayette area of County
Service Area (CSA) P-6, pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 2.3 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the California Government
Code.
2. The boundaries of the territory to be included in the zone area are described in 'Exhibit A' and shown in 'Exhibit B', both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. The formation of Zone 2903 is proposed to provide the County of Contra Costa with a method of financing an increased level
of police protection services to the area within the zone.
4. The proposed zone would provide a level of police protection services that exceeds the level of service outside the zone, and if
approved by the voter, the proposed zone would generate additional revenue in the form of special taxes to fund the increase in
this level of service.
5. The increase in the level of service would be financed through the levy of a voter-approved special tax on all taxable parcels
within the zone.
6. The name proposed for the zone is “Zone 2903” of CSA P-6.
At 9:30 a.m. on June 4, 2013, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,
Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the proposed formation of Zone 2903 of CSA P-6.
The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by (1) publishing a notice that complies with
Government Code section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all
owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and special district that contains, or whose sphere
of influence contains, the proposed zone; and (4) posting the notice in at least three public places within the territory of the
proposed zone.
At 9:30 a.m. on June 4, 2013, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,
Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the proposed formation of Zone 2903 of CSA P-6.
The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by (1) publishing a notice that complies with
Government Code section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all
owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and special district that contains, or whose sphere
of influence contains, the proposed zone; and (4) posting the notice in at least three public places within the territory of the
proposed zone.
Contact: Christine Louie, 925-674-7787
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: May 14, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
Page 65 of 115
Page 66 of 115
Page 67 of 115
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN the hearing on the proposed formation of Zone 2903 within County Service Area P-6; CONSIDER all oral
and written comments; and CLOSE the hearing.
2. DETERMINE whether a majority protest of the voters residing within the boundaries of proposed Zone 2903
exists pursuant to Government Code section 25217.1(b)(1). In the event that the Board determines a majority protest
exists, TERMINATE the proceedings.
3. If the Board determines a majority protest does not exist, ADOPT Resolution No. 2013/230 attached hereto,
establishing Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6 subject to voter approval of a special tax to fund police protection
services within the zone.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and the election is paid for by the subdivider.
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision #9174 (County File #SD07-9174), prior to recording the final map for
the subdivision, the subdivider is required to establish a special police services tax district for the subdivision in order
to provide additional funding to augment police services in the area of the subdivision. The property
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 06/04/2013 APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED
OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Christine Louie,
925-674-7787
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: June 4, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
SD. 4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation and Development Director
Date:June 4, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF ZONE 2903 IN COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6
IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF LAFAYETTE (DISTRICT V)
Page 68 of 115
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
to be placed within the special tax district consists of a vacant 5.9-acre site located at 1964 Reliez Valley Road in
the unincorporated Lafayette area.
On May 14, 2013, the Board granted conceptual approval of an August 6, 2013, ballot measure seeking approval
of a special tax to fund an increase in the level of police protection services that is provided in the unincorporated
area of Lafayette.
On May 14, 2013, the Board approved Resolution No. 2013/194, as required by Government Code section 25217,
subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area (CSA) P-6. The proposed zone
would serve as the vehicle to collect special taxes within the proposed zone if a special tax measure is approved by
voters on August 6, 2013.
Pursuant to Government Code section 25217.1, subdivision (a), at the public hearing, the Board is required to hear
and consider any protests to the formation of the zone. Pursuant to Government Code section 25217.1, subdivision
(b)(1), in the case of inhabited territory, if at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board determines that more
than 50 percent of the total number of voters residing within the proposed zone have filed written objections to the
formation, then the Board shall determine that a majority protest exists and terminate the proceedings.
If there is no majority protest, the Board may continue the proceedings to form the zone by adopting Resolution
No. 2013/230, which would establish Zone 2903 subject to voter approval of the special tax. A separate hearing is
also scheduled for June 4, 2013, to consider the adoption of an ordinance authorizing the levy of the tax.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Zone 2903 would not be formed and the subdivider would be unable to comply with the conditions of approval of
the project. The subdivider would be unable to record the Final Map for the subdivision.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
None.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
CLOSED the hearing; DETERMINED that a majority protest of the voters residing within the boundaries of
proposed Zone 2903 does not exist; ADOPTED Resolution No. 2013/230 establishing Zone 2903 of County
Service Area P-6 subject to voter approval of a special tax to fund police protection services within the zone.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2013/230
Legal Description Zone 2903
Map Zone 2903
Board Resolution 2013/194
Page 69 of 115
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 06/04/2013 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2013/230
CREATING ZONE 2903 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE LAFAYETTE AREA
This Board recognizes the need for increased police protection services in the above subject zone and the difficulty of funding the
current or an increased level of services. Establishing the subject zone is a necessary step for the Board of Supervisors to seek
voter approval of a special tax for increased police protection services in the zone area. Government Code sections 25217 and
25217.1 establish procedures for the formation of a zone within a county service area.
1. It is in the public interest to provide an increased level of police protection services in the area of proposed Zone 2903 of
County Service Area P-6.
2. A majority protest against the proposed formation of Zone 2903 does not exist, pursuant to Government Code section 25217.1,
subdivision (b).
3. Subject to voter approval of Ordinance No. 2013-13 on August 6, 2013, authorizing the levy of a special tax within proposed
Zone 2903, that portion of Contra Costa County Service Area P-6 described in Exhibit A attached hereto and shown in Exhibit B
attached hereto is established as Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6, effective upon this Board’s adoption of a resolution
declaring the results of the August 6, 2013, election (“Effective Date”).
4. No affected properties located in Zone 2903 will be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations as a
result of the formation of said zone.
5. On or after the Effective Date, the Clerk of this Board shall cause the filing of a statement of the creation of said zone to be
made with the County Assessor and the State Board of Equalization (in Sacramento) pursuant to Government Code sections
54900-54902. The filing shall include a map or plat indicating the boundaries of said zone.
Contact: Christine Louie, 925-674-7787
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: June 4, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
Page 70 of 115
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN hearing to consider adoption of Ordinance No. 2013-13, authorizing the levy of a special tax for police
protection services in Zone 2903 of County Service area P-6 in the unincorporated area of Lafayette; CONSIDER oral
and written comments received; and CLOSE the public hearing.
2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2013-13, attached hereto.
3. ADOPT Resolution 2013/233, attached hereto, authorizing an election in Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6 to
consider approval of Ordinance No. 2013-13.
4. DIRECT the County Clerk, Elections Division, to conduct the election required by Government Code sections
23027 and 53978. This election shall be held on August 6, 2013.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and election is paid for by the subdivider.
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision No. 9174 (County File #SD07-9174), prior to recording the final map
for the subdivision, the subdivider
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 06/04/2013 APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED
OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Christine Louie,
925-674-7787
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: June 4, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
SD. 5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation and Development Director
Date:June 4, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL TAX ORDINANCE AND AUTHORIZE
ELECTION TO OBTAIN VOTER APPROVAL (DISTRICT V)
Page 71 of 115
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
is required to establish a special Police Services tax district for the purposes of providing additional funding to
augment police services in the area of the subdivision. The property to be subdivided and placed within the
proposed special tax district consists of a vacant 5.9-acre site located in the unincorporated area of Lafayette.
On May 14, 2013, the Board approved Resolution No. 2013/194, as required by Government Code section 25217,
subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area (CSA) P-6 in the
unincorporated area of Lafayette. The proposed zone would serve as the vehicle to collect special taxes within the
boundaries of the zone if a special tax measure is approved by registered voters within the zone area at the August
6, 2013, election.
The Board is scheduled to conduct a separate hearing on June 4, 2013, on the formation of the proposed zone. If
the Board determines there is no majority protest to the formation of this new zone, and if the Board adopts
Resolution No. 2013/230, establishing CSA P-6, Zone 2903 subject to voter approval of the special tax, the next
step in the process is the hearing on the adoption of a special tax ordinance, the adoption of that ordinance and
adoption of a resolution submitting the tax measure to the voters.
In this action, the Board is asked to conduct the hearing on, and adopt, the special tax ordinance (Ordinance No.
2013-13), which would authorize the levy of a special tax for police protection services on all taxable parcels in
the area of Zone 2903 if a special tax ballot measure is approved by a two-thirds majority of the registered voters
in the zone area. Resolution No. 2013/233, the adoption of which is also recommended, sets forth appropriate
ballot language, directs the County Clerk, Elections Division, to conduct the aforementioned election as part of
the August 6, 2013 election, and supplies appropriate ballot language.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The project developer would be unable to comply with the conditions of approval for the project. The developer
would be unable to record the Final Map for the subdivision.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
None.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
CLOSED the public hearing; ADOPTED Ordinance No. 2013-13; ADOPTED Resolution 2013/233
authorizing an election in Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6 for Subdivision No. 9174 in the Lafayette
area, to consider approval of Ordinance No. 2013-13; and DIRECT the County Clerk, Elections Division, to
conduct the election required by Government Code sections 23027 and 53978 to be held on August 6, 2013.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2013/233
Legal Description Zone 2903
Map Zone 2903
Ordinance 2013-13
Board Resolution 2013/194
Page 72 of 115
Page 73 of 115
Page 74 of 115
Page 75 of 115
Page 76 of 115
Page 77 of 115
Page 78 of 115
Page 79 of 115
Page 80 of 115
Page 81 of 115
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the canvass of votes for the August 6, 2013 Special Election, showing that the measure for police services
in County Service Area P-6, Zone 2903, Supervisorial District 2, Lafayette area, passed as follows:
Total
Landowners Votes Yes No
1 1 6 0
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The attached certificate of the County Clerk provides the results of the August 6, 2013 Special Election for County
Service Area P-6, Zone 2903, Subdivision 9174, wherein each landowner of the affected area was allowed one vote
for each acre or portion thereof on Resolution No. 2013/230 so as to authorize a special tax on said property located
in Zone 2903 of County Service Area P-6 to maintain the present level of police protection services and provide
additional funding for increased police protection services.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Board does not accept the canvass of votes, Zone 2903 will not be formed.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 09/10/2013 APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED
OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Rosa Mena, 925.335.7806
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 10, 2013
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy
cc: Elections Division
C.127
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Joseph E. Canciamilla, Clerk-Recorder
Date:September 10, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ACCEPT THE CANVASS OF VOTES FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 ZONE 2903 LAFAYETTE AREA
Page 82 of 115
None.
Page 83 of 115
ATTACHMENTS
Election Certificate
Statement of Votes
Page 84 of 115
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK AS TO THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF
THE POLICE SERVICE AREA P-6, ZONE 2903, SUBDIVISION 9174 SPECIAL
ELECTION.
State of California }
} ss.
County of Contra Costa }
I, JOSEPH E. CANCIAMILLA, County Clerk of Contra Costa County, State of
California, do hereby certify that I did canvass the returns of the votes cast onAugust 6,
2013 Special Election. I further certify that the statement of the votes cast, to which this
certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast in said County, and the
whole number of votes cast for and against the measure in said County and in each
respective precinct therein, and that the totals of the respective columns and the totals
as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 6th day of August, 2013.
JOSEPH E. CANCIAMILLA, County Clerk
By_________________________________
Rosa M. Mena
Elections Processing Supervisor
Page 85 of 115
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST
OFFICIAL CANVASS
CONTRA COSTA POLICE SERVICE AREA P-6,
ZONE 2903, SUBDIVISION 9174
The Election was conducted on August 6, 2013, by Landowners of
the effected area. Each Landowner was allowed one vote for each acre or
portion thereof.
Total Landowners Voted Yes No
1 1 6 0
Page 86 of 115
RECOMMENDATION(S):
SET the special tax levy for police services Zones in County Service Area P-6 for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 as set forth
in Exhibit A.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is estimated the department will receive $1.7 million cumulative revenue for all zones within County Service Area
(CSA) P-6 in fiscal year 2014/15. This amount reflects a 2.8% increase from the fiscal year 2013/14 cumulative
amount of approximately $1.6 million. Revenue from the zones within CSA P-6 is adjusted annually based on the
April Urban Area Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for the San Francisco Bay Area.
BACKGROUND:
The above action fixes the tax rates per parcel in the P-6 Zones as outlined in their respective ordinances. In July of
each calendar year, the Board of Supervisors sets the special tax levy for parcels in each CSA P-6 zone based on the
April CPI-U indicator released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) as discussed in the fiscal impact section.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The special tax levy will not be authorized by the Board of Supervisors, and the taxes will not be included on the
2014/2015 Property Tax Roll.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD
COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 07/29/2014 APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED
OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Liz Arbuckle, (925)
335-1529
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: July 29, 2014
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Liz Arbuckle, Heike Siewell, Tim Ewell
C.133
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:July 29, 2014
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Setting Special Tax Levy for County Service Areas P-6 Zones
Page 87 of 115
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
No impact.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A
Attachment A
Page 88 of 115
Exhibit A SET the special tax levy for police services in County Service Area P-6 for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 as follows: Zone 200 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 192.44 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 384.86 Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 769.71 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $1,154.56 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,539.41 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $769.71 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $1,154.56 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,539.41 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $384.86 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $384.86 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $769.71 This zone is in its 25th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 201, 1000, 1600, 2700 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 169.94 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 339.87 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 679.74 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $1,019.60 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,359.47 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 679.74 Page 89 of 115
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $1,019.60 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,359.47 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 339.87 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 339.87 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 679.74 These zones are in their 21st year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 500, 700, 1100, 1500, 1601, 1800, 2300, 2600, 2601, 2900 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 166.02 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 332.02 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 664.04 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 996.05 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,328.06 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 664.04 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 996.05 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,328.06 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 332.02 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 332.02 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 664.04 These Zones are in their twentieth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 202, 1501, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1801, 2701, 3000, 3100 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 163.43 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 326.85 Page 90 of 115
Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 653.68 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 980.52 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,307.35 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 653.68 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 980.52 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,307.35 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 326.85 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 326.85 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 653.68 These zones are in their 19th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 400, 701, 702, 1200, 1502, 2500, 2901 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 157.59 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 315.17 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 630.36 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 945.54 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,260.72 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 630.36 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 945.54 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,260.72 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 315.17 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 315.17 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 630.36 These Zones are in their 18th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Page 91 of 115
Zones 1001, 1503, 1605, 1606 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 152.80 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 305.60 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 611.19 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 916.78 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,222.37 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 611.19 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 916.78 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,222.37 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 305.60 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 305.60 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 611.19 These Zones are in their 17th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 1504, 1505, 1506, 1607, 1608, 1700, 1803, 2000, 2702 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 146.06 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 292.11 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 584.21 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 876.32 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,168.42 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 584.21 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 876.32 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,168.42 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 292.11 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 292.11 Page 92 of 115
Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 584.21 These zones are in their 16th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 501, 1101, 1609, 1610, 1611, 1612, 2501, 2800 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 140.75 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 281.49 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 562.96 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 844.44 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,125.92 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 562.96 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 844.44 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,125.92 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 281.49 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 281.49 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 562.96 These Zones are in their 15th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 1613, 2200, 2201, 2801 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 133.00 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 266.00 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 532.00 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 798.00 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,064.00 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 532.00 Page 93 of 115
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 798.00 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,064.00 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 266.00 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 266.00 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 532.00 These Zones are in their 14th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 502, 1507, 1508, 1614, 1804, 2502, 2902 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 131.14 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 262.26 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 524.51 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 786.77 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,049.02 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 524.51 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 786.77 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,049.02 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 262.26 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 262.26 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 524.51 These Zones are in their thirteenth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 900, 1509, 1510, 1511, 1615, 3101, 3102 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 128.72 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 257.43 Page 94 of 115
Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 514.85 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 772.27 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,029.69 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 514.85 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 772.27 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,029.69 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 257.43 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 257.43 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 514.85 These Zones are in their 12th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 203, 204, 503, 1002, 1004, 2602, 3103 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 127.55 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 255.08 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 510.15 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 765.22 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $1,020.29 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 510.15 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 765.22 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $1,020.29 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 255.08 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 255.08 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 510.15 These Zones are in their 11th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Page 95 of 115
Zones 504, 1003, 1201, 2202, 2203, 3001, 3104 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 124.21 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 248.41 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 496.80 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 745.20 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 993.59 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 496.80 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 745.20 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 993.59 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 248.41 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 248.41 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 496.80 These Zones are in their 10th year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 205, 301, 2603, 2703 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 120.29 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 240.56 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 481.12 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 721.67 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 962.23 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 481.12 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 721.67 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 962.23 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 240.56 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 240.56 Page 96 of 115
Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 481.12 These Zones are in their ninth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 206, 207, 208, 209, 1005, 1006, 1512, 1616, 2704, 3002, 3105, 3106, 3107 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 116.38 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 232.75 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 465.49 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 698.22 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 930.96 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 465.49 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 698.22 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 930.96 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 232.75 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 232.75 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 465.49 These Zones are in their eighth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 210, 1513, 2604, 2605, 3003, 3004, 3108, 3109, 3110 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 111.69 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 223.37 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 446.72 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 670.08 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 893.44 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 446.72 Page 97 of 115
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 670.08 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 893.44 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 223.37 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 223.37 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 446.72 These Zones are in their seventh year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zones 211, 2503 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 111.44 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 222.87 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 445.73 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 668.60 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 891.46 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 445.73 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 668.60 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 891.46 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 222.87 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 222.87 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 445.73 These Zones are in their sixth year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zone 3112 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 105.24 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 210.47 Page 98 of 115
Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 420.93 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 631.39 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 841.85 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 420.93 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 631.39 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 841.85 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 210.47 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 210.47 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 420.93 This Zone is in its third year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Zone 1202 Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17-18, 20, 30, 50) - $ 102.78 Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11-16, 19, 21-24, 29) - $ 205.56 Apartments up to 24 units (Use Codes 25-26) - $ 411.12 Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27) - $ 616.67 Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28) - $ 822.23 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33-36, 38-40, 43, 46-49, 52-54, 56, 70, 73-75) $ 411.12 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31-32, 41, 44-45, 55, 76) $ 616.67 Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78) - $ 822.23 Land (Use Codes 61-62) $ 205.56 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88-89, 99) $ 205.56 Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87) $ 411.12 This Zone is in its second year of levy. Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinances authorizing the special tax levies, the property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index. Page 99 of 115
Attachment A
Office of the Sheriff‐Coroner
FY 2014/15 County Service Area P‐6 Zones, Special Tax Levy
Zone Number and Involved Ordinance
Zone 200 Ord. No. 89‐44 Zone 1504 Ord. No. 97‐43 Zone 2501 Ord. No. 99‐39
Zone 201 Ord. No. 93‐46 Zone 1505 Ord. No. 98‐37 Zone 2502 Ord. No. 00‐37
Zone 202 Ord. No. 95‐60 Zone 1506 Ord. No. 98‐29 Zone 2503 Ord. No. 08‐06
Zone 203 Ord. No. 03‐29 Zone 1507 Ord. No. 01‐15 Zone 2600 Ord. No. 95‐12
Zone 204 Ord. No. 04‐37 Zone 1508 Ord. No. 01‐17 Zone 2601 Ord. No. 93‐81
Zone 205 Ord. No. 04‐12 Zone 1509 Ord. No. 01‐22 Zone 2602 Ord. No. 03‐25
Zone 206 Ord. No. 06‐07 Zone 1510 Ord. No. 02‐11 Zone 2603 Ord. No. 04‐41
Zone 207 Ord. No. 06‐23 Zone 1511 Ord. No. 02‐14 Zone 2604 Ord. No. 06‐68
Zone 208 Ord. No. 06‐38 Zone 1512 Ord. No. 06‐08 Zone 2605 Ord. No. 07‐12
Zone 209 Ord. No. 06‐67 Zone 1513 Ord. No. 07‐03 Zone 2606 Ord. No. 11‐16
Zone 210 Ord. No. 06‐69 Zone 1600 Ord. No. 94‐06 Zone 2700 Ord. No. 93‐44
Zone 211 Ord. No. 08‐21 Zone 1601 Ord. No. 92‐25 Zone 2701 Ord. No. 95‐04
Zone 300 Ord. No. 03‐28 Zone 1602 Ord. No. 95‐10 Zone 2702 Ord. No. 97‐40
Zone 301 Ord. No. 04‐42 Zone 1603 Ord. No. 95‐40 Zone 2703 Ord. No. 05‐13
Zone 400 Ord. No. 96‐12 Zone 1604 Ord. No. 96‐23 Zone 2704 Ord. No. 06‐03
Zone 500 Ord. No. 95‐60 Zone 1605 Ord. No. 97‐20 Zone 2800 Ord. No. 99‐41
Zone 501 Ord. No. 99‐30 Zone 1606 Ord. No. 97‐26 Zone 2801 Ord. No. 99‐53
Zone 502 Ord. No. 01‐12 Zone 1607 Ord. No. 98‐12 Zone 2900 Ord. No. 94‐50
Zone 503 Ord. No. 03‐36 Zone 1608 Ord. No. TBD Zone 2901 Ord. No. 96‐15
Zone 504 Ord. No. 04‐21 Zone 1609 Ord. No. 99‐38 Zone 2902 Ord. No. 01‐01
Zone 700 Ord. No. 94‐12 Zone 1610 Ord. No. 99‐34 Zone 2903 Ord. No. 13‐13
Zone 701 Ord. No. 96‐16 Zone 1611 Ord. No. 99‐33 Zone 3000 Ord. No. 95‐26
Zone 702 Ord. No. 96‐22 Zone 1612 Ord. No. 99‐42 Zone 3001 Ord. No. 04‐34
Zone 900 Ord. No. 02‐18 Zone 1613 Ord. No. 00‐28 Zone 3002 Ord. No. 06‐41
Zone 1000 Ord. No. 94‐19 Zone 1614 Ord. No. 01‐14 Zone 3003 Ord. No. 07‐04
Zone 1001 Ord. No. 98‐17 Zone 1615 Ord. No. 02‐10 Zone 3004 Ord. No. 07‐05
Zone 1002 Ord. No. 03‐27 Zone 1616 Ord. No. 06‐02 Zone 3005 Ord. No. 08‐01
Zone 1003 Ord. No. 04‐02 Zone 1700 Ord. No. 98‐20 Zone 3100 Ord. No. 96‐17
Zone 1004 Ord. No. 05‐11 Zone 1800 Ord. No. 95‐11 Zone 3101 Ord. No. 01‐24
Zone 1005 Ord. No. 06‐15 Zone 1801 Ord. No. 95‐50 Zone 3102 Ord. No. 02‐21
Zone 1006 Ord. No. 06‐42 Zone 1803 Ord. No. 98‐47 Zone 3103 Ord. No. 03‐07
Zone 1100 Ord. No. 94‐07 Zone 1804 Ord. No. 01‐08 Zone 3104 Ord. No. 04‐29
Zone 1101 Ord. No. 99‐21 Zone 2000 Ord. No. 98‐30 Zone 3105 Ord. No. 06‐01
Zone 1200 Ord. No. TBD Zone 2200 Ord. No. 99‐53 Zone 3106 Ord. No. 06‐24
Zone 1201 Ord. No. 03‐35 Zone 2201 Ord. No. 00‐02 Zone 3107 Ord. No. 06‐27
Zone 1202 Ord. No. 12‐14 Zone 2202 Ord. No. TBD Zone 3108 Ord. No. 07‐13
Zone 1500 Ord. No. 95‐24 Zone 2203 Ord. No. 04‐35 Zone 3109 Ord. No. 07‐38
Zone 1501 Ord. No. 95‐49 Zone 2300 Ord. No. 94‐69 Zone 3110 Ord. No. 07‐39
Zone 1502 Ord. No. 96‐29 Zone 2500 Ord. No. 96‐14 Zone 3112 Ord. No. 10‐05
Zone 1503 Ord. No. 98‐04
Page 100 of 115
Conditions of Approval
Police Service District (major subdivisions of 5 or more lots)
Election for Establishment of a Police Services District to Augment Police Services — The owner of the
property shall participate in the provision of funding to maintain and augment police services by voting
to approve a special tax for the 9 residential parcels created by this subdivision approval. The tax shall
be per parcel annual amount (with appropriate future CPI adjustment) then established at the time of
voting by the Board of Supervisors. The election to provide for the tax shall be completed prior to filing
the Final Map. The property owner shall be responsible for paying the cost of holding the election,
payable at the time the election is requested by the owner. Allow a minimum of three to four months
for processing.
Police Services Mitigation (minor subdivisions of 4 or fewer lots)
The following requirements shall be met prior to recording a Parcel Map OR issuance of a building
permit as specified below:
A. Prior to recording a Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit two copies of a proposed
disclosure statement for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The approved
statement shall be used to notify prospective buyers of parcels, which are not occupied, by
existing legally established residences at time of recording the tentative map application. The
disclosure statement shall advise prospective buyers of affected parcels that prior to issuance of
a building permit, they will be required to contribute to the County $ 1,000.00 for police services
mitigation. The fee may be paid to the Contra Costa County Application & Permit Center.
B. Prior to issuance of a building permit on any parcel that is not occupied by a legal residence;
the applicant shall contribute $ 1,000.00 to the County for police services mitigation. The fee
shall be paid to the Contra Costa County Application & Permit Center.
Page 101 of 115
CUMULATIVE POLICE ZONE (P6) FY 13-14 BALANCES AS OF 12/22/2014
AREA DESCRIPTIONSZONE #'s BY AREABalance FY12/13FY 13-14 Trsfs to CAB-RevenueNet Interest earnedTotal Zone Funds AvailableVehicle Fleet Charges Air SupportInvestment ExpenseFY 13-14 Zone Specific CostsTotal F/Y Expenditures FY 13/14 BalanceALAMO / LAS TRAMPAS 1600-1616, 1802-1804 $650,556.20 $79,391.00 $276.27 $730,223.47 $0.00 $0.00 ($26.31)$0.00 ($26.31)$730,197.15
BAY POINT 200-210 $634,533.55 $188,580.00 $269.46 $823,383.01 $0.00 $0.00 ($25.67)($217,746.97)($217,772.64)$605,610.38
BETHEL ISLAND 301 $481,030.48 $109,811.00 $204.27 $591,045.75 $0.00 $0.00 ($19.46)$0.00 ($19.46)$591,026.30
BYRON 700-702 $26,702.31 $2,402.00 $11.34 $29,115.65 $0.00 $0.00 ($1.08)$0.00 ($1.08)$29,114.57
CAMINO TASSAJARA 2200-2203 $815,787.54 $248,866.00 $346.43 $1,064,999.97 $0.00 $0.00 ($33.00)$0.00 ($33.00)$1,064,966.98
CLYDE 900 $5,778.82 $1,149.00 $2.45 $6,930.27 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.23)$0.00 ($0.23)$6,930.04
CONCORD 1200-1202 $11,322.15 $1,336.00 $4.81 $12,662.96 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.46)($300.00)($300.46)$12,362.50
DIABLO 1800-1801 $89,951.51 $10,924.00 $38.20 $100,913.71 $0.00 $0.00 ($3.64)$0.00 ($3.64)$100,910.07
DISCOVERY BAY 500-504 $1,327,373.75 $580,221.00 $563.67 $1,908,158.42 ($24,862.10)$0.00 ($53.69)($717,415.40)($742,331.19)$1,165,827.23
E. CAM TASS / N. HIGHLAND 2000 $2,523.79 $0.00 $1.07 $2,524.86 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.10)$0.00 ($0.10)$2,524.76
E. CAMINO TASSAJARA 2300 $1,563.19 $0.00 $0.66 $1,563.85 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.06)$0.00 ($0.06)$1,563.79
EL SOBRANTE / W. BRIONES 3100-3110 $301,706.23 $42,274.00 $128.12 $344,108.35 $0.00 $0.00 ($12.20)$0.00 ($12.20)$344,096.15
KNIGHTSEN 400 $2,016.57 $0.00 $0.86 $2,017.43 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.08)$0.00 ($0.08)$2,017.34
MARTINEZ 2600-2605 $19,320.05 $4,790.00 $8.20 $24,118.25 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.78)$0.00 ($0.78)$24,117.47
N. RICHMOND / SAN PABLO 3000-3005 $260,970.43 $74,370.00 $110.82 $335,451.25 $0.00 $0.00 ($10.56)$0.00 ($10.56)$335,440.70
ORINDA / MORAGA 2900-2902 $45,760.52 $5,121.00 $19.43 $50,900.95 $0.00 $0.00 ($1.85)$0.00 ($1.85)$50,899.10
PACHECO 1000-1006 $469,735.16 $75,701.00 $199.48 $545,635.64 $0.00 $0.00 ($19.00)$0.00 ($19.00)$545,616.64
PLEASANT HILL BART 1100-1101 $46,004.45 $4,776.00 $19.54 $50,799.99 $0.00 $0.00 ($1.86)$0.00 ($1.86)$50,798.13
RODEO / CROCKETT / PORT COSTA 2500-2502 $151,879.42 $16,503.00 $64.50 $168,446.92 $0.00 $0.00 ($6.14)$0.00 ($6.14)$168,440.77
S.SR4 TO BRIONES 2700-2704 $12,563.08 $1,050.00 $5.34 $13,618.42 $0.00 $0.00 ($0.51)$0.00 ($0.51)$13,617.91
SAN RAMON-WEST 1700 $623,864.01 $106,595.00 $264.93 $730,723.94 $0.00 $0.00 ($25.23)$0.00 ($25.23)$730,698.71
W. WALNUT CREEK 2800-2801 $115,985.54 $15,711.00 $49.25 $131,745.79 $0.00 $0.00 ($4.69)$0.00 ($4.69)$131,741.10
WALNUT CREEK 1500-1513 $133,412.98 $21,795.00 $56.66 $155,264.64 $0.00 $0.00 ($5.40)$0.00 ($5.40)$155,259.24
TOTALS ALL ZONES $6,230,341.73 $1,591,366.00 $2,645.77 $7,824,353.50 ($24,862.10)$0.00 ($252.00)($935,462.37)($960,576.47)$6,863,777.03
P:\MJ\P Zones\Copy of P-6 Zone FY13 14 Ending 12.22.14.xls3/3/2015
Page 102 of 115
L4Cell:
Fiscal:Comment:
For one Resident Deputy
E9Cell:
Office of the Sheriff:Comment:
special election $300
H11Cell:
NB: see monthly fleet charges on expense detail for Fund 2629Comment:
L11Cell:
Fiscal:Comment:
For two Resident Deputies and one Specialist
D26Cell:
Fiscal:Comment:
Beginning balance 13/14 $5,849,576.25 plus end of year 12/13 adjustments of $821,097 revenue and $440,331.52 expense
E26Cell:
Office of the Sheriff:Comment:
includes $300 of special election fee of Concord Zone 1202
N26Cell:
Fiscal:Comment:
FY 13/14 end of year $7,266,578.13 less end of year expenses due to other funds: $394,819.54
P:\MJ\P Zones\Copy of P-6 Zone FY13 14 Ending 12.22.14.xls3/3/2015
Page 103 of 115
Page 104 of 115
Page 105 of 115
Page 106 of 115
Pinole
Hercules
San
Pablo
Richmond
El
Cerrito
Orinda
Lafayette
1
}þ24
}þ4
§¨¦580
5
2
§¨¦80
§¨¦80
Index Map: P-6 Zones in Contra Costa County as of July 2014
0 2 41
Miles
Map Created 2/23/2015
by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553
37:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W
This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the
CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. P-6 Zones are derived from tax data and do not represent
legal boundaries. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy.
This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited.
Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.®
AlamedaCounty
District 1
P-6 Zones
Supivisorial Districts
City Limits
Kensington
North
Richmond
El Sobrante
Rodeo
Montalvin
Manor
Tara Hills
Page 107 of 115
§¨¦680
El
Cerrito
Orinda Lafayette
1
}þ24
2
1 4
3
5
Moraga
Walnut
Creek
Clayton
Danville
San
Ramon
Pleasant
Hill
§¨¦980
§¨¦880
§¨¦580
}þ13
§¨¦680 ContraCosta County
§¨¦80
Index Map: P-6 Zones in Contra Costa County as of July 2014
0 2 41
Miles
Map Created 2/23/2015
by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553
37:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W
This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the
CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. P-6 Zones are derived from tax data and do not represent
legal boundaries. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy.
This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited.
Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.®
AlamedaCounty
District 2
P-6 Zones
Supivisorial Districts
City Limits
Alamo
Saranap
Conta
Costa
Centre
Kensington
Page 108 of 115
§¨¦680 2
4
3
Walnut
Creek
Clayton
Danville
San
Ramon
Pleasant
Hill
§¨¦680 ContraCosta County
Concord Antioch
Pittsburg
}þ242
}þ4
5
2
Oakley
Brentwood
}þ4
}þ4
567J4
AlamedaCounty
SanJoaquinCounty
Discovery Bay
Byron
§¨¦205
Index Map: P-6 Zones in Contra Costa County as of July 2014
0 2 41
Miles
Map Created 2/23/2015
by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553
37:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W
This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the
CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. P-6 Zones are derived from tax data and do not represent
legal boundaries. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy.
This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited.
Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.®
District 3
P-6 Zones
Supivisorial Districts
City Limits
Bay Point
Alamo
Bethel Island
Knightsen
Page 109 of 115
}þ4
Lafayette
}þ24
4
5
Walnut
Creek
Clayton
Pleasant
Hill
§¨¦680 ContraCosta County
Concord
Antioch
Pittsburg
}þ242
}þ4
Martinez 5
2 3
Saranap
5Index Map: P-6 Zones in Contra Costa County as of July 2014
0 2 41
Miles
Map Created 2/23/2015
by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553
37:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W
This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the
CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. P-6 Zones are derived from tax data and do not represent
legal boundaries. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy.
This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited.
Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.®
District 4
P-6 Zones
Supivisorial Districts
City Limits
Bay Point
Alamo
Pacheco
Conta
Costa
Centre
Page 110 of 115
}þ4Pinole
Hercules
San
Pablo
Richmond
El
Cerrito
Orinda
Lafayette}þ24
}þ4
§¨¦80
1 4
5
Moraga
Walnut
Creek
Clayton
Pleasant
Hill
§¨¦680 ContraCosta County
Concord Antioch
Pittsburg
}þ242
}þ4
Martinez 5
2
3
AlamedaCounty
SolanoCounty
SolanoCounty
}þ29
}þ37
§¨¦80 §¨¦680
El
Sobrante
SanPabloBay
SuisunBay
Montalvin
Manor
Tara
Hills Oakley
Brentwood
}þ4
Index Map: P-6 Zones in Contra Costa County as of July 2014
0 2 41
Miles
Map Created 2/23/2015
by Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development, GIS Group
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553
37:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W
This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the
CA State Board of Equalization's tax rate areas. P-6 Zones are derived from tax data and do not represent
legal boundaries. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility for its accuracy.
This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited.
Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.®
District 5
P-6 Zones
Supivisorial Districts
City Limits
Bay Point
Pacheco
Kensington
Crockett
Rodeo
North
Richmond
Page 111 of 115
5123344PRIMARY BEAT STRUCTUREBay StationCreated By:The Crime Analysis UnitContra Costa County Office of the SheriffPage 112 of 115
33PRIMARY BEAT STRUCTUREDelta StationCreated By:The Crime Analysis UnitContra Costa County Office of the Sheriff3131313231Page 113 of 115
21202322PRIMARY BEAT STRUCTUREMuir StationCreated By:The Crime Analysis UnitContra Costa County Office of the Sheriff2221Page 114 of 115
111213PRIMARY BEAT STRUCTUREValley StationCreated By:The Crime Analysis UnitContra Costa County Office of the Sheriff1313131111111112121212Page 115 of 115