Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 05132024 - TWIC Agenda PktAGENDA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee Supervisor Diane Burgis, Chair Supervisor Candace Andersen, Vice Chair District 2 Office: 309 Diablo Rd. Danville, CA 94526 | District 3 Office: 3361 Walnut Blvd. Suite 140, Brentwood, CA 94513 9:30 AMMonday, May 13, 2024 ZOOM LINK https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/85061313447 | Dial: 888-278-0254 | ACCESS CODE: 198675 The public may attend this meeting in person at either above locations and/or remotely via call-in or ZOOM. 1.AGENDA ITEMS may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee. 2.INTRODUCTIONS Call to order and roll call. 3.PUBLIC COMMENT on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to two (2) minutes). 4.REVIEW meeting record for the April 8, 2024, Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee. 24-1274 Meeting MinutesAttachments: Page 1 of 3 1 Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee AGENDA May 13, 2024 5.Report on Local, State, Regional, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative and Planning Activities 24-1275 NADTC Innovations - CCTA: Accessible Transportation MW-May Leg Report for TWIC.pdf SB 1031 Text SB1031 Term Sheet SB 1031 Fact Sheet CA Dept Of Tax & Fee Admin: CCC Active Taxes Letter: Sen. Glazer to BOS Chair BART SB 1031Letter Letter: SamTrans to Senate Transportation Letter: Advocates to Authors State Net Legislation report (5-8-24).pdf Attachments: 6.CONSIDER Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Annual Project List for Unincorporated Contra Costa County 24-1276 Attachment A Local Streets and Roads Project ListAttachments: 7.RECEIVE staff report and RECOMMEND that the Board of Supervisors approve the submission of grant applications to the Active Transportation Program grant program for Cycle 7. 24-1277 8.RECEIVE Status Report on the General Plan Update: Transportation Element 24-1278 Chapter_5_Transportation-Element.pdf 2-22-24EnviroCoalitionGPComments.pdf Attachments: 9.RECEIVE Communication, News, Miscellaneous Items of Interest to the Committee and DIRECT staff as appropriate. 24-1279 E-bikes Need More and Bigger Bike Lanes - The Santa Barbara Independent CCTA: April 30 2024 RTPC Memo New bill pushes Bay Area transit consolidation - San Mateo Daily Journal AC Transit, and BART Announce Partnership to Modernize Paratransit Services Attachments: ADJOURN until the next Transportation, Water, & Infrastructure Committee meeting to be held on Monday, June 10, 2024 at 9:30am. Page 2 of 3 2 Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee AGENDA May 13, 2024 GENERAL INFORMATION This meeting provides reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend a the meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of members of the Committee less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar St., 4th Floor, Martinez, during normal business hours. Staff reports related to items on the agenda are also accessible on line at www.co.contra-costa.ca.us. HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT Persons who wish to address the Committee during public comment on matters within the jurisdiction of the Committee that are not on the agenda, or who wish to comment with respect to an item on the agenda, may comment in person, via Zoom, or via call-in. Those participating in person should offer comments when invited by the Committee Chair. Those participating via Zoom should indicate they wish to speak by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app . Those calling in should indicate they wish to speak by pushing *9 on their phones. Public comments generally will be limited to two (2) minutes per speaker. In the interest of facilitating the business of the Board Committee, the total amount of time that a member of the public may use in addressing the Board Committee on all agenda items is 10 minutes. Your patience is appreciated. Public comments may also be submitted to Committee staff before the meeting by email or by voicemail. Comments submitted by email or voicemail will be included in the record of the meeting but will not be read or played aloud during the meeting. For Additional Information Contact: John Cunningham (925)655-2915 Page 3 of 3 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1274 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:4. TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 5, 2024 Subject:REVIEW Meeting Record for April 8, 2024, Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee Submitted For:N/A Department:DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Referral No:N/A Referral Name:N/A Presenter:John Cunningham | DCD Contact:John Cunningham (925)655-2915 Referral History: This record was prepared pursuant to the Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205(d) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Referral Update: Any handouts or printed copies of testimony distributed at the meeting will be attached to this meeting record. SEE ATTACHMENT. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): APPROVAL of the attached Record of Action for the April 8, 2024 Committee Meeting with any necessary corrections. Fiscal Impact (if any): N/A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/8/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™4 Meeting Minutes - Draft CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee Supervisor Diane Burgis, Chair Supervisor Candace Andersen, Vice Chair 9:30 AMDistrict 3 Office: 3361 Walnut Blvd. Suite 140, Brentwood, CA 94513 | 1516 Kamole St. Honolulu, HI 96821 Monday, April 8, 2024 ZOOM LINK https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/85061313447 | Dial: 888-278-0254 | ACCESS CODE: 198675 The public may attend this meeting in person at either above locations and/or remotely via call-in or ZOOM. AGENDA ITEMS may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee. 1.INTRODUCTIONS Call to order and roll call. Staff Present: Jamar Stamps | TWIC Staff Attendees: Raquel Caicedo, Maureen Toms, John Kopchik, Carl Roner, Mark Watts Alicia Nuchols, Jerry Fahy, Emlyn Struthers, Gayle Israel, Jeff Valeros, Carolyn Wysinger Candace Andersen and Diane BurgisPresent: 2.PUBLIC COMMENT on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to two (2) minutes). No Public Comment. 3.REVIEW meeting record for the March 11, 2024 Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee Attachments:TWIC 03.11.24 Meeting Minutes The Committee unanimously ACCEPTED the April TWIC Meeting Record . No Public Comment. 4.RECEIVE staff report and RECOMMEND Board of Supervisors approve submission of the grant application to the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant program. Page 1 of 3 5 Transportation, Water & Infrastructure CommitteeMeeting Minutes - Draft April 8, 2024 The Committee ACCEPTED the report to apply for the SS4A Grant and DIRECTED staff to place the item on an upcoming BOS Agenda (consent). No Public Comment. 5.RECEIVE staff report and RECOMMEND that the Board of Supervisors approve the submission of a Letter of Interest Application Form and grant application to the MTC and ABAG for the 2024 PCA Grant Program. The Committee ACCEPTED the report to apply for the 2024 PCA Grant and DIRECTED staff to place the item on an upcoming BOS Agenda (consent). No Public Comment. 6.CONSIDER report on Local, State, Regional, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative and Planning Activities Attachments:April State Leg Report for TWIC.pdf 3/24/2024: BOS to state delegation re: accessible transportation State Net report (4-2-24).pdf The Committee COMMENTED on the need to advocate for the transit agencies, work towards a unified approach across the county, be proactive in safeguarding smaller agencies and communities, particularly in East County, and stressed that unified action would help to protect and enhance their influence in the legislative processes . No Public Comment. 7.RECEIVE Communication, News, Miscellaneous Items of Interest to the Committee and DIRECT staff as appropriate. Attachments:Mokelumne Pedestrian/Bike Bridge Opening BaltimorePortClosure_West Coast Impacts Bicycle use soars following installation of separated bike lanes Bike Lanes Are Good for Business, but Store Owners Still Hate Them The Committee ACCEPTED the report and in response to the Baltimore Port inquired about a report regarding the vulnerability of Bay Area bridges. Staff acknowledged the query and offered to research further. No Public Comment. ADJOURN until the next Transportation, Water, & Infrastructure Committee meeting to be held on Monday, May 13, 2024 at 9:30am. GENERAL INFORMATION HOW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT For Additional Information Contact: Page 2 of 3 6 Transportation, Water & Infrastructure CommitteeMeeting Minutes - Draft April 8, 2024 Page 3 of 3 7 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1275 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 13, 2024 Subject:Report on Local, State, Regional, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative and Planning Activities Submitted For:TRANSPORTATION, WATER, & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Department:DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Referral No:N/A Referral Name:Legislative Matters on Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Presenter:John Cunningham - DCD Contact:John Cunningham (925)791-1368 Referral History: The transportation, water, and infrastructure legislation and planning report is a standing item on the Committee’s agenda. Referral Update: In developing transportation related issues and proposals to bring forward for consideration by TWIC, staff receives input from the Board of Supervisors (BOS), references the County’s adopted Legislative Platforms, coordinates with our legislative advocates, partner agencies and organizations, and consults with the Committee. This report includes four sections, 1: Local, 2: Regional, 3: State, and 4: Federal. 1. Local Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan See attached, National Aging and Disability Transportation Center: 2023 Innovations Showcase: Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Office of Accessibility and Equity The National Aging and Disability Transportation Center (NADTC) conducts an annual competition to highlight innovations in the accessible transportation field. The attached NADTC "Innovation Showcase" profiles out-of-the-box thinking and alignment of resources and include the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's efforts to implement the Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan. 2. Regional No report in May 3. State The County's legislative advocate will be at the May Committee meeting, the monthly report is attached. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/8/2024Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™8 File #:24-1275 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #: SB1031 (Wiener) - Connect Bay Area Act of 2024 This bill is generating a significant amount of interest and has been amended twice since its introduction on February 6th. The bill is scheduled for a Senate Appropriations hearing the morning of the May TWIC meeting. The County's advocate and staff will provide a verbal update at the Committee meeting. SB1031 Attachments ·Bill Text ·Term Sheet ·Fact Sheet ·CA Dept Of Tax & Fee Admin: CCC Active Taxes ·Letter: Sen. Glazer to BOS Chair ·Letter: BART to Authors ·Letter: SamTrans to Senate Transportation ·Letter: Advocates to Authors Considerations for Contra Costa County Local transportation revenue streams (sunset) ·Contra Costa Transportation Authority Measure J (2034) ·BART Sales Tax (Ø) ·BART Parcel Tax (Ø) ·BART 2016 Bond (30 year payoff, first issuance payoff = 2046) ·City Measures: El Cerrito (Ø), Martinez (2032), Orinda (2041) Transit Agencies per County +/- Considering the consolidation language in the bill, "...recommendations for the consolidation or elimination of transit agencies and their governing bodies...", the following is a breakdown of transit agencies operating in each Bay Area County. (Excludes non-BART/SMART rail and WETA) ·5-Contra Costa ·5-Solano ·5-Sonoma ·4-Alameda: ·3-Marin ·3-San Francisco ·2-San Mateo ·2-Santa Clara ·1-Napa Positions Support Metropolitan Transportation Commission (Sponsor) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/8/2024Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™9 File #:24-1275 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #: Napa Valley Transportation Authority Seamless Bay Area San Francisco County Transportation Authority California Yimby Housing Action Coalition Sustainable Silicon Valley Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club Oppose Valley Transportation Authority - unless amended Sonoma - unless amended San Mateo - unless amended Watch California State Association of Counties 4. Federal No report in May Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER report on Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative and Planning Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): None. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/8/2024Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™10 National Aging and Disability Transportation Center 2023 Innovations Showcase Cover Photo Credits (from left): Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Senior Resource Association, and MET-Go! 11 INTRODUCTION This publication presents 14 Transportation Innovations selected by the National Aging and Disability Transportation Center (NADTC) through a nationwide competition. The Showcase profiles out-of-the-box thinking and alignment of resources. Innovations may be entirely original or represent a creative adaptation of an approach that has worked in other places or program settings or with different populations. NADTC has defined innovations as the development and implementation of new services; new or improved approaches to service delivery, accessibility, planning or program oversight; new solutions to longstanding problems; new ways of engaging, serving and improving accessibility for specific underserved, marginalized or hard-to-reach communities; multisector coordination to improve accessibility and services; or new technological applications to enhance participation and accessibility. NADTC received 27 submissions that met the criteria of being in operation for a minimum of six months; representing a local, state, regional or tribal entity or organization, whether private, nonprofit, or government; and providing information on community partnerships, funding sources, community need, outcomes, lessons learned and replicability. The 14 organizations whose innovations were selected are organized into six categories. Four program innovations, indicated by an asterisk, fall into more than category. Accessibility • Contra Costa Transportation Authority* • Healthy Generations Area Agency on Aging • Lane Transit District • Mountain Empire Older Citizens • Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation* • rabbitcares • Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management* • Senior Resource Association* Coordination • Contra Costa Transportation Authority* • Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio • Harris County Transit • Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission Cross Jurisdictional Boundaries • Senior Resource Association* Equity • Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation* • Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management* Health Care Access • EMBARK • United Way of Southeastern Idaho Technology • PennDOT Bureau of Public Transportation The 14 transportation programs whose innovations are profiled here use a variety of approaches, strategies, tools, techniques and ideas. It is NADTC’s hope that other transportation programs will consider adapting one or more of the Innovations to meet identified needs in their own communities. To learn more, please contact NADTC or reach out to any of the Innovators profiled in this publication. 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contra Costa Transportation Authority 1 The 14 recognized transportation programs are listed below in alphabetical order by organization name. rabbitcares 10 Grocery Cart Program York, PA Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission 11 Regional Transportation Collaborative Culpeper, VA Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management 12 Hop Scott Volunteer Program Shakopee, MN Senior Resource Association 13 Developmental Mobility Advantage Ride Program Vero Beach, FL United Way of Southeastern Idaho 14 Ride United Pocatello, ID Office of Accessibility and Equity Walnut Creek, CA Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio 2 home52 Transportation Blue Ash, OH EMBARK 3 EMBARK Well Senior Health & Wellness Transportation Oklahoma City, OK Harris County Transit 4 Harris County RIDES Houston, TX Healthy Generations Area Agency on Aging 5 Transition to Transit Travel Training Program Fredericksburg, VA Lane Transit District 6 Service Animal Paw Print Program Eugene, OR Mountain Empire Older Citizens 7 MET-Go! Big Stone Gap, VA PennDOT Bureau of Public Transportation 8 Find My Ride Harrisburg, PA Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation 9 Quaboag Connector Ware, MA Photo Credit: EMBARK, Oklahoma City, OK 13 ACCESSIBILITY and COORDINATION Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Office of Accessibility and Equity Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) established an Office of Accessibility and Equity (OAE) to improve mobility for community members and formed a nonprofit coordinating entity that fosters collaboration and leads efforts to integrate all accessible transportation services in the county. For more than three years, this work has brought together community-based organizations, consumers, elected officials, transit providers and county staff with CCTA to implement programs such as a countywide, one-seat ride program; means-based fare programs; a medical trip shuttle; and a one-call/one-click system. What makes this innovative? Over the past 30 years, three accessible transportation studies in the community were conducted, all recommending significant changes in accessible transportation administration and operations; however, implementation was never achieved. Working with this legacy, CCTA and Contra Costa County conducted a fourth study, the Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP). The ATSP included extensive outreach to the community and stakeholders. In addition to program recommendations, the ATSP recommended the creation of a “coordinating entity” (a nonprofit) to ensure prompt implementation, and CCTA created and staffed a new office, the OAE. These activities have resulted in the establishment of a culture and mechanism for overseeing coordinated accessible transportation, reaffirming CCTA’s commitment to the aging and disability population in the county. The innovation uses a dual approach, 1) quick implementation of short-term initiatives and 2) creation of a permanent governance mechanism to support ongoing advocacy and oversight for accessible transportation. The OAE coordinating entity is a permanent forum where those with concerns, questions and issues about accessible transportation have a place to voice their thoughts. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: • Create opportunities for community feedback and dialogue. Development of the strategic plan offered opportunities for extensive public outreach which enabled stakeholders to communicate their concerns about funding and governance. • Obtain commitment from a critical mass of elected officials throughout the county and commitment of staff time and funding. These commitments must occur when implementing a new plan and before securing funding. • Be sure to account for any lessons learned from previous efforts to establish a coordinating entity and make accommodations in your plans, if necessary. Photo Credit: Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Walnut Creek, CA Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Walnut Creek, CA Ying Smith Director, Mobility Programs ysmith@ccta.net 1NADTC’s Innovation Showcase 1NADTC’s Innovation Showcase 14 2 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase COORDINATION Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio home52 Transportation Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio’s home52 Transportation is a same-day transportation model that enhances specialized transportation accessibility and fosters collaboration among regional providers. home52 Transportation has addressed the limitations of public transportation in the area by providing accessible vehicles, personalized support and frequent communication with riders, drivers and medical facilities. Through provider coordination, home52 Transportation creates a more efficient and reliable transportation system by reducing deadhead miles and creating cost savings for providers, funders and riders. What makes this innovative? As the Area Agency on Aging in the region, the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio has provided access to transportation to older adults for decades. However, the traditional transportation model was failing to meet the needs of clients and creating challenges such as a lack of on-demand access, inconsistency in quality among transportation providers and multiple providers operating in siloes that were inefficient and lacked flexibility. The home52 model was launched in spring 2021 in collaboration with the local hospital association and multiple medical and transportation providers. Together, an enhanced transportation model was designed that differs from traditional non-emergency transportation. The program is funded through a combination of sources including 5310, private grants and service contracts. home52’s coordination center contracts with 40 community transportation providers and uses transportation management software to select and dispatch the closest appropriate vehicle to the pick-up destination. The service is door-through-door, on-demand transportation for same-day appointments. Real-time vehicle tracking and communication with providers ensures efficiency and quality assurance. This approach enhances and supports livability through improved healthcare access and social connectedness for individuals with specialized transportation needs. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: • Acquire an affordable and efficient Transportation Management System (TMS) to streamline coordination and communication with transportation providers. A well-designed TMS will enhance scheduling, dispatching and real-time tracking, optimizing operations and costs. • Hire IT staff to support the technology used by drivers for a smooth implementation and to ensure drivers can effectively use it. • Dedicate resources to marketing efforts aimed at attracting a quality provider network. This involves promoting the benefits of collaboration to potential transportation partners. • Create awareness with marketing directed at eligible riders. • Allocate resources to hire and train call center staff and implement reliable call center software. These two steps are indispensable to success in delivering exceptional customer service. Photo Credit: Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio, Blue Ash, OH Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio Blue Ash, OH Bryan Black home52 Transportation Manager bblack@help4seniors.org 15 HEALTH CARE ACCESS EMBARK EMBARK Well Senior Health & Wellness Transportation EMBARK Well is a no-cost, on-demand transportation program for older adults and individuals with disabilities in Oklahoma City. EMBARK Well provides access to health, nutrition, and exercise options to support aging in place and address the social determinants of health. At launch, EMBARK Well was route-based and served six area wellness centers. Currently, the program has transitioned to an on-demand model and serves all Oklahoma City Parks & Recreation Department locations, all YMCA Wellness Centers, and a network of Senior Health and Wellness Centers. What makes this innovative? Oklahoma City is large with more than 600 square miles, and the public transportation system operates across approximately 212 square miles of that area. EMBARK Well is locally funded and fills the gap for older adults who lack close access to the fixed route system. EMBARK Well provides access to social activities and exercise and fitness classes, and it supports a variety of programs such as cooking and food preparation that are operated by partner organizations. EMBARK Well uses the services of a regional Transportation Network Company that meets all requirements for training, screening and drug/alcohol compliance. Under the initial, route-based model of the program, per trip costs were approximately $10-$12; however, as locations were added, the program moved to an on-demand, shared-ride model and trip costs are currently between $18-$25, depending on distance. Following the initial launch of EMBARK Well, a small study was conducted to gauge the impact of improved transportation access and regular exercise on an individual’s overall health and wellness. The study found participants lowered their A1C score, improved their ability to control blood sugar levels and improved overall feelings of health and wellness. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Start with a small pilot to gauge interest and control costs, then scale up the program as awareness and demand increase. •Find ways to contain program costs. For example, EMBARK Well participants are required to attend the wellness location closest to their residence. •Promote the service. EMBARK Well created rack card displays at all locations in the community where older adults might congregate. WELL See the back to learn who qualifies and how to apply. Call 405-297-2583 to complete a quick phone interview. EMBARK Well is a transportation program for seniors age sixty (60)+. Designed for today’s senior adults, who want to enjoy the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. Exercise matters: Read about improving you health with EMBARK Well at www.embarkok.com/embark-well. Photo Credit: EMBARK, Oklahoma City, OK EMBARK Oklahoma City, OK Marilyn Dillon Mobility Management Administrator marilyn.dillon@okc.gov NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 3 16 4 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase COORDINATION Harris County Transit Harris County RIDES Harris County RIDES is a unique, coordinated demand-response transportation program formed in 2003 that provides specialized transportation for older adults, people with disabilities and vulnerable low-income populations who live outside of the Houston METRO service area or are unable to access METRO services. It is a “fill in the gaps” service designed to help targeted individuals remain independent within communities. This is a countywide service, serving 1,778 square miles and available 24/7, 365 days of the year. The program also provides mobility management services. What makes this innovative? RIDES operates as an electronic voucher program. Rides for eligible riders are subsidized at 50 percent for each trip. The ride subsidy is either paid by one of the 35 partner agencies or the riders themselves. The remaining 50 percent is paid by RIDES using FTA Section 5310 funding. In addition, mobility management is provided to clients to promote independence in the community whether using RIDES or other transportation resources. Once funds are loaded on the card, the rider can travel anywhere within Harris County or into neighboring counties within certain parameters. Harris County RIDES coordinates with local nonprofits, human services organizations, local transportation providers and public transportation to avoid duplication of services. Before the implementation of RIDES, many nonprofit organizations and community centers offered transportation using vans, which created significant overhead costs for drivers, vehicles, insurance and schedulers. With RIDES, these organizations simply fund fares on an electronic card for each of their clients and RIDES picks them up. Partner agency transportation budgets go farther because of the 50-percent match by RIDES. Trip data, participant lists, or other management reports that agencies may need are available to them by password access into the RIDES database management system. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Secure a champion to obtain community leader and governmental support. Engagement with a coalition of supportive community stakeholders is also important. •Document the need in your community. In this example, an outside consultant was contracted to conduct a study, funded by the MPO organization, to reveal and document what was already known: There were gaps in services for seniors and people with disabilities. •Expect bumps and obstacles along the way, but don’t be discouraged. Be forward thinking! Photo Credit: Harris County Transit, Houston, TX Harris County Transit Houston, TX Vernon Chambers Assistant Transit Director Vernon.chambers@csd.hctx.net 17 ACCESSIBILITY Healthy Generations Area Agency on Aging Transition to Transit Travel Training Program Health Generations Area Agency on Aging’s Transition to Transit Travel Training Program has been in operation for 10 years and has served mainly the aging population but also refugees, migrants, college students and others who are new to the area or living in underserved communities. Healthy Generations’ Transition to Transit is a consumer-focused travel training that introduces high school students with disabilities to the region’s public transit system. Students learn how to navigate the public transit system safely and efficiently, while acquiring life skills and learning personal safety strategies. The goal of Transition to Transit is to facilitate transportation equity and independent travel for students with disabilities by providing the skills needed to navigate the transit system safely and comfortably. This ultimately creates a new generation of transit users who will have access to employment, medical support, goods and services and other community resources. What makes this innovative? Healthy Generations’ Certified Travel Training Instructor (CTTI) partners with local high school job coaches to educate transitional high school students with disabilities about transit apps and wayfinding technology; the transit system, routes and stops; and pedestrian and personal safety. Student participants receive origin-to-destination training by riding transit with job coaches and the CTTI. A local hotel and restaurant act as the destination for students where they are hosted for lunch, learn about restaurant etiquette and learn to calculate gratuities. Participants are empowered to be independent, confident users of the transit system and encouraged to become transit advocates and ambassadors. The program is funded by FTA Section 5310 and meets a need identified in the state’s Coordinated Human Services Mobility Plan to partner with educational facilities for a transportation and mobility program for students with disabilities. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Devote staff time to outreach, development and training. •Be flexible and person-centered based on the individual training needs of program participants. The support and coordination provided by high school job coaches working with the students has been essential to program success. •Invest in staff training to ensure staff will have the skills needed to implement a Transition to Transit program. •Scale costs associated with staff time, marketing and promotional items relative to the size of the service area and school system. Photo Credit: Healthy Generations Area Agency on Aging, Fredericksburg, VA Healthy Generations Area Agency on Aging Fredericksburg, VA TaMara Banks Certified Travel Training Instructor and Outreach Specialist tbanks@healthygenerations.org NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 5 18 6 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase ACCESSIBILITY Lane Transit District Service Animal Paw Print Program Lane Transit District’s Service Animal Paw Print Program creates a better boarding experience for public transit passengers with service animals. This voluntary program allows riders with service animals to receive a paw print symbol on their rider card, which indicates to drivers that the rider has already been asked what task their service animal has been trained to perform and doesn’t need to be asked again. What makes this innovative? Prior to this program, passengers would expect to be asked when boarding the bus about the status of their animal and what task it is trained to perform. This can be an inconvenience for frequent riders. Through this program, regular riders need to show only their card with the paw print symbol when boarding. This contributes significantly to expediting the overall boarding process. While anyone with a service animal who does not have a card may still board after answering questions, the Service Animal Paw Print Program benefits both transit riders and bus drivers by minimizing unnecessary barriers. This program is a collaborative partnership between a transit agency and the disability community, and riders with service animals have the choice of voluntarily participating or not. Lane Transit’s experience is that the Service Animal Paw Print Program has been enthusiastically embraced by both transit operators and passengers who have service animals. The program has resulted in a noticeable decrease in complaints and conflicts on buses. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Incorporate the program with an existing in-service training for ease of implementation and distribute cards when evaluating people with disabilities for reduced fares. Program resources required are minimal: cost of developing and disseminating cards and staff time to educate, train and implement. •Scale the program based on the size of the transportation agency. A blueprint is available for other transit providers to replicate the Lane Transit District’s program at: www.ltd.org/file_viewer.php?id=3694. Photo Credit: Lane Transit District, Eugene, OR Lane Transit District Eugene, OR John Ahlen Accessible Services Program Manager john.ahlen@ltd.org 19 ACCESSIBILITY Mountain Empire Older Citizens MET-Go! Mountain Empire Older Citizens’ MET-Go! program is a microtransit service in the rural community of Big Stone Gap, VA, serving the City of Norton and the Town of Wise in Wise County. Microtransit offers an on-demand service that can be accessed by mobile phone or online portal to book a trip for same-day service in the service zone, and response time to the ride request takes just a few minutes. What makes this innovative? MET-Go! uses a microtransit technology from Via to address the transportation needs in a rural community. MET-Go! makes it simple and easy for riders, including older adults and people with disabilities, to schedule safe, reliable, on-demand transportation at their convenience. Through Met-Go! community members gain better access to the community with a service that augments the demand-response service that requires 24-hour notice. Funded by FTA Section 5311 (rural) funds and an Integrated Mobility Innovation (IMI) grant from the Federal Transit Administration, the program improves access to transportation and, therefore, better access to health care, food, public services, socialization, shopping, education and employment. In its first year MET-Go! completed 44,000 trips; more than 26,000 of those trips were provided to older adults or people with disabilities. Nearly one- third of trips were for medical reasons. Service evaluation of both the microtransit program and the demand-response transportation service encompasses quality of service, average estimated time of arrival for microtransit/ on-demand trips only, ride availability, average wait time and rider survey comments. In each instance, MET-Go! has outperformed demand-response service in cost per ride, cost per hour, and miles per trip. Rider surveys and comments characterize MET-Go! as life-changing. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Secure the right partnerships, including a strong technology partner like Via. Mountain Empire partners with the University of Virginia at Wise, the City of Norton and the Town of Wise. •Hire or identify a driver who will champion the program. •Emphasize face-to-face and word-of-mouth awareness to achieve best promotional results. Drivers and staff attended community events and forums to distribute promotional materials. •Secure at least two vehicles and drivers, and staff who can be flexible in developing the service if starting a brand new microtransit program. Photo Credit: MET-Go!, Big Stone Gap, VA Mountain Empire Older Citizens Big Stone Gap, VA Mitch Elliot Transit Director melliot@meoc.org NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 7 20 8 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase TECHNOLOGY PennDOT Bureau of Public Transportation Find My Ride PennDot Bureau of Public Transportation’s Find My Ride (FMR) is an online application that enables prospective users or someone acting on their behalf (e.g., a family member or transportation staff member) to make a single application for the most prevalent transportation assistance programs in Pennsylvania. Users answer a series of basic questions about their transportation needs, and the application automatically adds the requirements of those programs for which an applicant is eligible. The completed application is then routed to the local providers of those programs. What makes this innovative? Someone applying for transportation assistance traditionally would need to know which services they qualified for and fill out a paper form or fillable PDF file for each provider of those services. With a single electronic application, FMR streamlines the process by automatically sending applications to all the appropriate programs and providers based on the answers an applicant provides. Applications also tend to contain fewer errors. Transit providers may also use this system when taking service calls by phone, which can result in an applicant booking a ride the same day they apply. FMR will be available in all Pennsylvania counties by early 2024. To date, more than 20,000 individuals have been approved for one or more transportation programs through the system. Development of the technology to create FMR was funded with FTA Sections 5310 and 5339 funding plus state funds. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Acquire both funding and staff resources to cover technology costs, project management, development and analysis. FMR was designed specifically for Pennsylvania’s large and complex network of coordinated human service transportation. An application for a smaller network of fewer overlapping providers might be deployed with similar benefits for less effort and less funding (FMR cost close to $3 million). •Work closely with transportation providers to obtain detailed requirements and obtain their support. •Review details with users (riders and providers) before starting development and coding of the online application form. •Factor in time for accessibility testing, stakeholder feedback and implementing fixes. Photo Credit: PDOT Bureau of Public Transportation, Harrisburg, PA PennDOT Bureau of Public Transportation Harrisburg, PA John Taylor Manager of Planning and Technology tjohn@pa.gov 21 ACCESSIBILITY and EQUITY Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation Quaboag Connector Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation’s Quaboag Connector is a rural transportation service developed through community collaboration and input to connect underserved rural residents of 10 Quaboag Valley communities with services and resources outside their area, such as health care and employment. While the Connector serves the general public, it prioritizes rides for older adults, people with disabilities and people with low incomes. What makes this innovative? The Connector is an accessible, affordable, demand-response, curb-to-curb service in a rural area largely unserved by regional transit. There are few sidewalks, traffic lights, streetlights or bike lanes in the region. Funded with FTA Section 5310 and 5311 funds plus private funding, rides are low or no cost, regardless of the rider’s location or distance traveled to a destination in the service area. The Connector provides on average 1,000 rides per month, primarily for employment and medical appointments. Sixty-seven percent of rides have been for older adults and people with disabilities, and services have been expanded to meet the needs of specific populations: •In 2022 the Connector took over Ware Senior Van Service, increasing access and extending hours of travel for older adults in Ware. •Baystate Health Convenient Care Van provides no cost, non-emergency medical transportation (Medicaid NEMT) to any Baystate Health facility in a 10-town service area through a partnership with Baystate Wing Hospital. •The Palmer Rides to Work program provides half-priced rides for low-income residents traveling to work, work-related training and job interviews. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Find out what makes riders feel safe and comfortable and what they need from a local transportation service when designing and developing a new transportation program. Paying attention to community feedback will help ensure success. •Dedicate at least one vehicle for a new program such as the Connector, preferably wheelchair accessible, and a place to keep it. Funding for fuel, maintenance and repairs is also necessary. •Plan for additional staff resources for implementing program operations, applying for funding, reporting, and ensuring compliance. •Develop printed materials to advertise the service in the community. Photo Credit: Quaboag Valley Community Development Corp Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation Ware, MA Jen Healy Rural Transit Program Manager jenh@qvcdc.org NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 9 22 10 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase ACCESSIBILITY rabbitcares Grocery Cart Program rabbitcares provides grocery carts to eligible rabbittransit riders (older adults, people with disabilities and veterans) who need help transporting bags while using public transportation. Riders are responsible for ensuring carts are secure at all times. On fixed routes, carts can be placed in any open wheelchair securement site or close to the rider. On paratransit, drivers help secure carts, as needed. Access to grocery carts gives personal access to healthy food and independence in shopping, while decreasing the risk of falling and fostering safety in public transit travel. What makes this innovative? Two and a half million Pennsylvanians (21 percent of the population) have limited access to food. Whether living in a food desert, having insufficient funds to purchase food, or experiencing mobility challenges, older adults and people with disabilities may encounter access issues that prevent them from obtaining food to keep them healthy and independent. Providing a grocery cart to public transportation riders won’t address all these issues, but it will help those who avoid shopping because they cannot carry grocery bags. Something as simple as a grocery cart can promote shopping independence and keep riders active, engaged in their community and healthy. Nearly 96 percent of those surveyed who have received carts said the program has positively impacted their quality of life and makes shopping safer by decreasing the risk of accidents and falls. More than 80 percent reported having a cart makes the difference between access to groceries and not having food when they need it. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Seek funding partners and referrals from other agencies when creating the program. •Ship the cart directly from the vendor, once a rider is deemed eligible. This is the easiest, most efficient way to handle delivery. •Implement a tracking system for funds requested and received as well as for carts requested, shipped and received. Photo Credit: rabbitcares, York, PA rabbitcares York, PA Sherry Welsh Administrator swelsh@rabbitcares.org 23 COORDINATION Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission Regional Transportation Collaborative The Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission has created the Regional Transportation Collaborative (RTC), a mobility management program, through the use of Virginia’s first one-call, one-click call center. Its flexible design allows partner programs to participate at the level they are able at any given time and increases the ability for nontraditional stakeholders to participate. Its collaborative structure enables RTC to leverage partnerships and resources to support fund raising, strategic planning, staffing, data collection and more. What makes this innovative? RTC’s Mobility Center provides mobility services through a central phone number, and it coordinates and supports information and referral. With a strong emphasis on collaboration among partners and sharing resources, RTC supports eight local transportation nonprofit programs, partners with more than 30 community agencies and continually implements new mobility solutions to address the region’s mobility challenges. Over a four-year period, from fiscal year 2019 through 2023, RTC generated nearly 600-percent growth in mobility funding and services for older adults and people with disabilities. RTC’s collaborative relationships with diverse partners means that rather than competing for funds, they can jointly apply, and they typically meet eligibility for any state or federal transportation grant, including match requirements. The collaboration has enabled RTC to increase funding from AARP and three local foundations as well. Partnerships also allow RTC to align priorities, data and services with local foundations. For example, RTC now partners with three programs supporting vulnerable individuals who need behavioral health counseling and drug and alcohol treatment services, which has opened new funding opportunities. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Secure local buy-in for the collaborative to enable the ability to leverage funding, staffing and partnerships. •Address partner differences in organizational policies and procedures when forming a collaboration. Partners should be willing to consider nontraditional approaches when exploring leveraging of funds, policies, service provision and more. •Secure commitments from all partners to dedicate ongoing staff time to the collaboration. Photo Credit: Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission, Culpeper, VA Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission Culpeper, VA Kristin Lam Peraza Mobility Manager klamperaza@rrregion.org NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 11 24 12 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase ACCESSIBILITY and EQUITY Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management Hop Scott Volunteer Program Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management’s Hop Scott program started as volunteer transportation offering food deliveries. It added citizen transport for non-emergency medical needs, transports for mental health, vets helping vets transportation, and now coordination with MiCASA to assist the Latino population in Scott County. With three, county-owned accessible vans driven by volunteers, this service is managed by two full-time mobility managers who also coordinate with public transit, oversee non-emergency medical transportation, problem solve for transportation options with County Human Services and recommend fixed route public transit solutions. What makes this innovative? The Hop Scott volunteer program is meeting multiple community needs and has started two new options with its wheelchair accessible vans, including coordination with MiCASA, a group focused on the needs of the Latino population throughout Scott County. First, the vans pick up food at local markets for distribution to the community, and second they help Latinos get to medical appointments and pre-school screenings. With a Live Well at Home grant funded by the Minnesota Department of Human Services, Hop Scott has 10 active volunteers who use either the accessible vans or their own vehicles with mileage reimbursement. The program is focused on older adults and people with disabilities to help them stay in their homes. Food delivery has been promoted with marketing flyers in both English and Spanish. Other Hop Scott marketing comprises of social and print media including Facebook, NextDoor, radio ads, and newspapers, which is also considered for language translation, as needed. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Balance marketing with volunteer recruitment to meet ride demand. •Consider nontraditional volunteers. Hop Scott has one volunteer who is under 30 and works full time but is willing to help in the evening or on weekends. •Secure county support with grants and matching funds along with support from local communities. Hop Scott has county funding through 2027 using local transportation tax dollars. •Partner with local service organizations to recruit volunteer drivers. •Acquire strong commitments from managers of the food programs who appreciate the impact of food delivery on local communities. Photo Credit: Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management, Shakopee, MN Scott/Carver Counties Mobility Management Shakopee, MN Alan Herrmann Mobility Management Supervisor aherrmann@co.scott.mn.us 25 ACCESSIBILITY and CROSS JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES Senior Resource Association Developmental Mobility Advantage Ride Program Senior Resource Association’s Advantage Ride program provides specialized training for transportation operators and staff working with developmentally disabled individuals on the Treasure Coast, and it leverages funds to offer zero-fare trips across a four-county area. It improves the lives of those with developmental disabilities by offering mobility options. The Advantage Ride program involves collaboration between two community transportation coordinators and four transportation operators, and everyone involved—drivers, call takers and administrators—receives specialized training to work with individuals with developmental disabilities. Funding has been acquired from four sources including the Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, Commission for Transportation Disadvantaged, the Florida Department of Transportation and St. Lucie County. What makes this innovative? The program offers riders access to transportation during times when fixed route and demand- response services are not available, and it alleviates rider concerns about having affordable and reliable transportation to employment, educational programs and medical services. The program provides safe, reliable transportation to allow individuals with disabilities to be more independent. One key aspect of the program is that each staff member, ranging from the driver to dispatcher, undergoes specialized training to work with individuals with developmental disabilities. The result is a safer and more friendly experience for riders. To make the eligibility process more inclusive and less confusing for riders, the program is fare free and involves contacting only one office. This streamlines the services, makes sure all residents on the Treasure Coast have equity and does not add an additional layer of complexity to a process that can be overwhelming to individuals with developmental disabilities. Without the zero-fare and no co-pay transportation service, individuals with developmental disabilities on the Treasure Coast would have to pay up to $50 per trip. The average number of daily trips is 237. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Provide basic IDD training to all transportation providers and staff. For example, –The Introduction to Developmental Disabilities Guide by the Agency for Persons with Disabilities –The Vulnerable Adult Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation video by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services –Five Tips for Working with People with Disabilities by Paraquad –Rutgers’ Developmental Disabilities Training Series: Understanding Behavior and Managing Behavior •Watch your budget allocations carefully. Senior Resource Association spends 82 percent of budgeted funds on transportation provider payments; 13 percent on staff wages, benefits and taxes; and five percent on marketing and postage. Photo Credit: Senior Resource Association, Vero Beach, FL Senior Resource Association Vero Beach, FL Karen Deigl CEO kdeigl@sramail.org NADNADTTC’C’s Innos Innovvation Showcaseation Showcase 13 26 14 NADTC’s Innovation Showcase HEALTH CARE ACCESS United Way of Southeastern Idaho Ride United United Way of Southeastern Idaho’s Ride United, funded with state and private funds through United Way, offers no-cost transportation above and beyond Medicaid NEMT for health-related activities for patients of the local free clinic, crisis and recovery centers, and mental health facilities. By providing no-cost transportation, nonprofits can help their clients to better address the social determinants of health related to health care and help them to achieve long-term, sustainable health improvements. Ride United also helps community members access other essential services such as dental appointments, housing support, meetings at local schools and more. What makes this innovative? Medicaid NEMT has strict policies on who can and cannot access rides and under what circumstances, and it does not cover all types of rides that Medicaid recipients need. Ride United’s holistic approach, designed by a team of community-based professionals in response to an assessment of local social determinants of health, found that asset-limited, income- constrained and employed (ALICE) community residents experience barriers to good health. One-third of those surveyed experience housing and food insecurity, and one-quarter experience unmet needs associated with utilities and transportation. The program has quickly grown to several hundred rides per month provided to this target population, including rides to medical care for a caregiver who was suffering congestive heart failure and rides provided to another community member with disabilities who was able to access permanent, supportive housing and avoid homelessness. Lessons Learned and Replication Advice: •Consider a United Way partnership to access technical support for innovative transportation solutions. •Develop a supplementary program for your state’s Medicaid NEMT, ensuring that all participating agencies understand and receive guidance on Medicaid NEMT rules. •Seek partners who are willing to troubleshoot issues and who have strong communication skills to work with transportation providers and riders when schedules change. •Allow for staff time to onboard new agencies, manage monthly billing, support troubleshooting, develop and maintain relevant policies and provide ongoing connections to partnering organizations. Photo Credit: United Way of Southeastern Idaho, Pocatello, ID United Way of Southeastern Idaho Pocatello, ID Amy Wuest Director of Health amy@unitewaysei.org 27 Call toll-free: 866.983.3222 Email: contact@nadtc.org Web: www.nadtc.org Find us on Facebook, X, YouTube & LinkedIn!   Who We Are Established in 2015, the NADTC is a federally funded technical assistance center administered by Easterseals and USAging based in Washington, DC. The National Aging and Disability Transportation Center is funded through a cooperative agreement of Easterseals, USAging, and the U.S Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, with guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living. USAging is the national association representing and supporting the network of Area Agencies on Aging and advocating for the Title VI Native American Aging Programs. Our members help older adults and people with disabilities live with optimal health, well- being, independence and dignity in their homes and communities. USAging and our members work to improve the quality of life and health of older adults and people with disabilities, including supporting people with chronic illness, people living with dementia, family caregivers and others who want to age well at home and in the community. Together, we are ensuring that all people can age well. Our members are the local leaders that develop, coordinate and deliver a wide range of home and community-based services, including information and referral/ assistance, case management, home-delivered and congregate meals, in-home services, caregiver supports, transportation, evidence-based health and wellness programs, long-term care ombudsman programs and more. www.usaging.org Easterseals is leading the way to full equity, inclusion, and access through life-changing disability and community services. For more than 100 years, we have worked tirelessly with our partners to enhance quality of life and expand local access to healthcare, education, and employment opportunities. And we won’t rest until every one of us is valued, respected, and accepted. Easterseals provides essential services and on-the-ground supports to more than 1.5 million people each year — from early childhood programs for the critical first five years, to autism services, to medical rehabilitation and employment programs, to veterans’ services, and more. Our public education, policy, and advocacy initiatives positively shape perceptions and address the urgent and evolving needs of the one in four Americans living with disabilities today. Together, we’re empowering people with disabilities, families and communities to be full and equal participants in society. www.easterseals.com March 2024 28 Smith, Watts &Hartmann, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations   May 7, 2024    To:  Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee   c/o John Cunningham     From:  Mark Watts    Re:  May 2024 TWIC  State Report     I am pleased to provide the following report on acƟviƟes occurring in the state Capitol, including  specifically updated informaƟon on legislaƟve and budgetary acƟviƟes:  Fiscal Year (FY) 2024‐25 State Budget Update; Update on FY 2024‐25 State Budget Negotiations.  Background:  Late last month, the Governor’s Office implemented a discretionary spending freeze across all  state agencies and departments, which will temporarily pause the release of the formula‐based  Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TICRP) and Zero‐Emission Transit Capital Program  (ZEC) funding approved in the Fiscal Year 2023‐24 budget [Senate Bill (SB) 125/ Assembly Bill  (AB) 102]. This “Section 74 spending freeze” authorization was a component of AB 106, the bill  that included a suite of “early action budget reduction” strategies; those “frozen” TIRCP and ZEC  expenditures could be on the table for the Legislature and Administration to cut through as we  near the conclusion of the budget process.    Overview of State Spending Freeze Impact on SB 125/AB 102 Funds    SB 125/AB 102 provided the state’s transit agencies with more than $2 billion over five years.  Many had anticipated imminently receiving the “year one” resources share of these resources.     While this short delay in receiving these resources is less‐than‐ideal, for Bay Area agencies, MTC  believes it will be manageable as transit operators are not facing immediate shortfalls and the  capital projects are not expected to need to expend funds in the very near‐term.     However, from a “Big Picture” perspective, it’s concerning that these funds are included in the  “freeze” as it indicates that ultimately, the funds may be at risk. The transit agencies within this  state are utilizing SB 125 funding commitments to sustain transit and invest in capital projects  that are leveraging billions of dollars in matching federal funds.    Timing/Next Steps  29 Smith, Watts &Hartmann, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations   While the Administration could “unfreeze” the funds at any time, it is not expected that  additional action will likely be taken until at least after the May Revision is released sometime  around May 14, 202.    Major Tax initiative on November Ballot – Update    This major tax “reform”; initiative is subject to the California Supreme Court review, with oral  arguments set for today. The measure is qualified to be presented to voters in November, 2024  to the concern of Gov. Gavin Newsom and top Democratic lawmakers who seek to demonstrate  to the Justices that, it's unconstitutional.    At stake is a basic executive power of the governor, as well as the Legislature and local  governments to impose new taxes to pay for public programs.    The measure, sponsored by the California Business Roundtable, would require voters to approve  taxes passed by the Legislature and would raise the voter‐approval threshold for some local  taxes to two‐thirds. (It would also retroactively apply to dozens of state and local‐level taxes that  had been passed since 2022.)    Key Legislation     SB 1031 (Wiener)     Introduced by Senators Scott Wiener and Aisha Wahab, this bill authorizes a Bay Area  transportation funding measure to be presented to the voters that is expected to raise between  $1‐2 billion annually and with reforms to deepen transit integration, study the consolidation of  public transit agencies, and more.     The bill is presently in the Senate Appropriations committee. In the past few weeks, CMAs and  some stakeholders have positioned themselves in opposition to SB 1031, known as the Connect  Bay Area Act, most notably, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority board. They cited  the possibility that putting the measure on the ballot in 2026, which other transit agencies and  legislators are pushing for to offset local agency budget gaps, could undercut the county’s efforts  to get voters to reauthorize existing transportation sales taxes, among other concerns.     The measure outlined by SB 1031 could raise $1.5 billion a year in the region’s nine counties,  likely in the form of a half‐cent sales tax possibly coupled with a parcel tax or another type or  levy, but many are now saying that the bill fails to guarantee that new tax revenues raised would  be fairly returned to the county.  30 Smith, Watts &Hartmann, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations   SB 1031 envisions that more than half of the overall revenue would go to pay for transit  operations and initiatives to help coordinate fares, schedules, signage and other operational  needs among the region’s 27 transit agencies. Part of the revenue would also go to street safety  and highway improvement projects.  At present the bill provides that MTC would administer the proceeds, and the bill requires at  least 70% of the money raised in each county to be spent on projects benefiting county  residents.  Behind‐the‐scenes negotiations on the legislation are ongoing, including the VTA, MTC and  Cortese. It gets its next hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee on May 13.  Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) ‐ Funding CYCLE 7  The TIRCP was established by Senate Bill (SB) 862 (Chapter 36, Statutes of 2014) and modified by  Senate Bill 9 (Chapter 710, Statutes of 2015), to provide grants from the Greenhouse Gas  Reduction Fund (GGRF) to fund transformative capital improvements intended to modernize  California’s intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems, and bus and ferry transit systems, to  significantly reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, vehicle miles traveled, and congestion.    SB 125     SB 125 (Chapter 54 of the Statutes of 2023) guided the distribution of $4 billion in General Fund  through TIRCP on a population‐based formula to regional transportation planning agencies,  which will have the flexibility to use the money to fund transit operations or capital  improvements. The budget also establishes the $1.1 billion Zero‐Emission Transit Capital    As indicated above, the Governor has “extended a freeze” to these funds for a 2‐month period  passing int the final budgetary adoption period of June 15, 2024.     2024 Programming Cycle    In the past month, CalSTA released it draft guidelines for the new 2024 TIRCP grant cycle that  will program projects starting with the 2024‐25 fiscal year and ending with the 2028‐29 fiscal  year. The new program cycle will include previously awarded and active projects that have not  been fully allocated by the end of the 2023‐24 fiscal year, and projects selected with the 2024  cycle. With the SB 125 General fund revenues frozen, the TIRCP remains a recipient of  a portion  of the Transportation Improvement Fee revenues established by SB 1 and a continuous  appropriation of 10 percent from the quarterly Cap‐and‐Trade auction proceeds deposited in the  GGRF, plus any annual budget allocations provided by enacted budget bills. The Cycle 7 Schedule  is as follow:  31 Smith, Watts &Hartmann, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations                                         32 Smith, Watts &Hartmann, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations   APPENDIX    KEY TransportaƟon BILLS OF NOTE   AB 2535 (Bonta): This bill would eliminate general purpose lanes as an eligible use for TCEP under any  circumstance and eliminate highway capacity as an eligible use in disadvantaged communities. Should a  highway project under TCEP expand the highway footprint in limited instances, the bill would require full  mitigation of all environmental impacts.  Status: May 8, Suspense candidate for Senate Appropriations  AB 2086 (Schiavo): AB 2086 would require Caltrans to report to the Legislature on how it advanced its  Core Four (safety, equity, climate action, and economic prosperity) priorities with the funding that was  made available to it in the preceding 5 fiscal years. AB 2086 would also create a new role for the CTC to  develop performance targets for the Core Four goals.  Status: Assembly Appropriations, not set for hearing.   AB 2290 (Friedman): AB 2290 would, among other things, require a bicycle facility that is identified for a  street in an adopted bicycle plan or active transportation plan to be included in a project funded by the  program that includes that street. This is of concern for rural counties and areas.   Status: Assembly Appropriations: Suspense File  SB 960 (Wiener): SB 960 would require all transportation projects funded or overseen by Caltrans to  provide “comfortable, convenient, and connected” complete streets facilities unless an exemption is  documented and approved. SB 960 would also require the CTC to adopt targets and performance  measures related to making progress on complete streets. Finally, SB 960 would require Caltrans to adopt  a Transit Priority Project policy for state and local highways.  Status: Seante Appropriations, Suspense File       33 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 16, 2024 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 18, 2024 SENATE BILL No. 1031 Introduced by Senators Wiener and Wahab (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Ting) February 6, 2024 An act to amend Sections 65081 and 66516 of, to add Section 13978.9 to, to add the heading of Division 1 (commencing with Section 66500) to Title 7.1 of, and to add Division 2 (commencing with Section 66538) to Title 7.1 of, the Government Code, to amend Section 99270.5 of the Public Utilities Code, to add Section 976.9 to the Unemployment Insurance Code, and to add Section 9250.3 to the Vehicle Code, relating to transportation. legislative counsel’s digest SB 1031, as amended, Wiener. San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation improvements. (1)  Existing law creates the Metropolitan Transportation Commission as a local area planning agency for the 9-county San Francisco Bay area with comprehensive regional transportation planning and other related responsibilities. Existing law creates various transit districts located in the San Francisco Bay area, with specified powers and duties relating to providing public transit services. This bill would authorize the commission to raise and allocate new revenue and incur and issue bonds and other indebtedness, as specified. In this regard, the bill would authorize the commission to impose a retail transactions and use tax, a regional payroll tax, a parcel tax, and a regional vehicle registration surcharge in all or a subset of the 9 counties of the San Francisco Bay area, in accordance with applicable 97 34 constitutional requirements. The bill would require the parcel tax to be collected by counties and the other 3 taxes to be collected by specified state agencies, and would require the net revenues from those taxes to be remitted to the commission, as prescribed. The bill would require the revenue generated pursuant to these provisions to be used for transportation improvements in the San Francisco Bay area, including for various transit purposes, and would require the commission to distribute those revenues in accordance with specified requirements and expressions of legislative intent. requirements. By adding to the duties of local officials with respect to elections procedures for revenue measures on behalf of the commission, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2)  Existing law establishes the Transportation Agency, consisting of various state agencies under the supervision of an executive officer known as the Secretary of Transportation, who is required to develop and report to the Governor on legislative, budgetary, and administrative programs to accomplish comprehensive, long-range, and coordinated planning and policy formulation in the matters of public interest related to the agency. This bill would require the Transportation Agency to select a transportation institute, as defined, to conduct an assessment of the associated advantages and disadvantages of consolidating all of the conduct an assessment that analyzes the benefits and disbenefits to riders, and the administrative, financial, legal, contractual, and governance feasibility, of various forms of consolidation, as defined, among transit agencies, as defined, that are located in the 9-county San Francisco Bay area, as specified. area. The bill would require that assessment to be completed on or before January 1, 2026, and would require, as part of that assessment, the transportation institute to provide recommendations on how to consolidate those transit agencies and to include certain information in the assessment. identify specified information about each transit agency and to consider certain topics relating to consolidation. Based on the findings of the assessment, the bill would require the Transportation Agency, on or before January 1, 2027, to recommend a comprehensive plan to consolidate all of the transit agencies located in the San Francisco Bay area, as provided. develop a report of recommendations that, among other things, identifies opportunities to consolidate 2 or more agencies and provides specific recommendations for the consolidation or elimination of transit agencies and their governing bodies without resulting in the elimination of 97 — 2 — SB 1031 35 programs and transportation services, as specified. The bill would establish the Bay Area Transit Consolidation and Coordination Technical Assistance Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of moneys that can be used for specified purposes, including paying for the cost of conducting the assessment and preparing the comprehensive plan, report, as specified. The bill would require the assessment and the comprehensive plan report to be submitted to the Legislature upon completion. (3)  Existing law requires the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to adopt rules and regulations to promote the coordination of fares and schedules for all public transit systems within its jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would revise and recast this provision by, among other things, providing that the commission is responsible for implementing a seamless transit rider experience across the San Francisco Bay area and requiring those rules and regulations to also promote the coordination of mapping and wayfinding, real-time transit information, and other customer-facing operating policies, as specified. The bill would also declare that it is the intent of the Legislature that the commission implement and sustain specified outcomes in undertaking these responsibilities. The bill would require the commission to submit an annual report to the Legislature on the status of those outcomes and the status of transit ridership in the San Francisco Bay area. By imposing additional duties on the commission, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (4)  Under existing law, a transit operator within the jurisdiction of the commission is not eligible to receive funding allocated by the commission pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program unless it has complied with the above-described rules and regulations adopted by the commission. This bill would also make a transit operator ineligible to receive an allocation from the commission of the revenues generated by the new taxing authority authorized by the bill or to make a claim pursuant to the Transportation Development Act for an allocation of funds from a local transportation fund if the operator is not in compliance with those rules and regulations. (5)  Existing law authorizes the commission and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to jointly adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common 97 SB 1031 — 3 — 36 area of the 2 agencies with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits, as specified. This bill would also authorize one of those commute benefit options to include an employer-provided regional transit pass. This bill would authorize the commission, as part of a measure to impose a tax described above, to propose a ballot measure that would require a covered employer that is located in proximity to transit to purchase a regional transit pass for each of its employees and to require a covered employer that is not located in proximity to transit to provide a subsidy to each of its employees corresponding in financial value to the regional transit pass, as specified. If the ballot measure is approved by the voters, the bill would require the commission and the district to update the ordinance accordingly. (6)  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.​ State-mandated local program: yes.​ The people of the State of California do enact as follows: line 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the line 2 following: line 3 (a)  The San Francisco Bay area needs a world-class, reliable, line 4 affordable, efficient, and connected transportation network that line 5 meets the needs of bay area residents, businesses, and visitors line 6 while also helping combat the climate crisis. line 7 (b)  A world-class transportation network will enhance access line 8 to opportunity, lower greenhouse gas emissions, strengthen the line 9 region’s economy, and improve quality of life. line 10 (c)  To achieve that vision, the San Francisco Bay area needs all line 11 of the following: line 12 (1)  A public transit network that offers safe, clean, frequent, line 13 accessible, easy-to-navigate, and reliable service that gets transit line 14 riders where they want and need to go safely, affordably, quickly, line 15 and seamlessly. 97 — 4 — SB 1031 37 line 1 (2)  Local roads that are well maintained. line 2 (3)  Transit, biking, walking, and wheeling options that are safe, line 3 convenient, and competitive alternatives to driving. line 4 (d)  Regional funding and reforms are necessary to create a line 5 climate-friendly transportation system that is safe, accessible, and line 6 convenient for all, including through doing all of the following: line 7 (1)  Protecting and enhancing transit service. line 8 (2)  Making transit faster, safer, and easier to use. line 9 (3)  Enhancing mobility and access for all. line 10 SEC. 2. This act shall be known, and may be cited as, the ____ line 11 Connect Bay Area Act of 2024. line 12 SEC. 3. Section 13978.9 is added to the Government Code, to line 13 read: line 14 13978.9. (a)  For purposes of this section, the following line 15 definitions apply: line 16 (1)  “Commission” means the Metropolitan Transportation line 17 Commission. line 18 (2)  “Consolidation” means a reform to transit agencies that line 19 includes one or more of the following: line 20 (A)  Combining staffs or back office functions of two or more line 21 transit agencies while retaining separate governing boards. line 22 (B)  Replacing multiple governing boards with a unified line 23 governing board representing a broader jurisdiction. line 24 (C)  Creating a more effective umbrella structure under which line 25 existing transit agencies are brought together but still operate as line 26 distinct agencies with separate governing boards. line 27 (D)  Increasing coordination across two or more transit agencies line 28 to deliver one or more components of a transportation service so line 29 the agencies can increase their capacity to provide trips. line 30 Coordination may include, but is not limited, to any of the line 31 following: line 32 (i)  Sharing passenger trips and vehicles. line 33 (ii)  Colocation of facilities, programs, or services. line 34 (iii)  Collaborating on grant applications, state or local plans, line 35 or both, training, vehicle purchasing, or maintenance. line 36 (iv)  Joint hiring of a mobility manager. line 37 (v)  Federal fund braiding. line 38 (3)  “Labor institute” means the University of California, line 39 Berkeley Labor Center or the UCLA Labor Center. line 40 (2) 97 SB 1031 — 5 — 38 line 1 (4)  “San Francisco Bay area” means the region comprising the line 2 commission’s jurisdiction, as prescribed by Section 66502. line 3 (3) line 4 (5)  “Transit agency” has the same meaning as “public line 5 transportation operator” as defined in subdivision (b) of Section line 6 99312.2 of the Public Utilities Code. line 7 (4) line 8 (6)  “Transportation institute” means either the University of line 9 California Institute of Transportation Studies or the Mineta line 10 Transportation Institute at San José State University. line 11 (b)  The Transportation Agency shall oversee the completion of line 12 the assessment required pursuant to subdivision (c) and the report line 13 of legislative recommendations required pursuant to subdivision line 14 (d) in a manner that emphasizes, across all facets of analysis and line 15 recommendations, benefits to riders and disabled riders, including line 16 those who use paratransit. The completion of the assessment and line 17 report shall include consultation with impacted stakeholders line 18 including, but not limited to, impacted transit agencies, transit line 19 unions, transit riders, and local governments. It is the intent of the line 20 Legislature that the assessment and the report help achieve all of line 21 the following goals with regard to the operation of public transit line 22 in the San Francisco Bay area: line 23 (1)  Improving the speed, efficiency, and reliability of service. line 24 (2)  Improving the affordability of fares. line 25 (3)  Improving the safety and cleanliness of service. line 26 (4)  Promoting the achievement of the state’s climate goals, line 27 including through the incorporation and diffusion of zero-emission line 28 technologies. line 29 (5)  Incorporating other technological changes that improve line 30 rider experience and safety. line 31 (6)  Improving accessibility of, and connections to, regional and line 32 interregional transit service in a manner that competes with private line 33 automobile travel, particularly for low-income residents and those line 34 residing in equity priority communities, as defined by the line 35 commission. line 36 (7)  Improving and simplifying the accountability of the line 37 transportation systems to the public and riders. line 38 (8)  Reducing administrative costs and improving cost line 39 efficiencies within and across transit agencies. line 40 (b) 97 — 6 — SB 1031 39 line 1 (c)  (1)  The Transportation Agency shall select a transportation line 2 institute to conduct an assessment of the associated advantages line 3 and disadvantages of consolidating all of the transit agencies that line 4 are located within the San Francisco Bay area, and shall oversee line 5 the transportation institute in that regard. in accordance with the line 6 requirements of this section. The transportation institute shall line 7 consult with a labor institute, if it chooses to participate, in line 8 conducting all aspects of the assessment with respect to impacts line 9 on the workforce and labor relations. The transportation institute line 10 shall complete the assessment on or before January 1, 2026, and line 11 upon completion, shall submit the assessment to the Legislature line 12 in compliance with Section 9795, and to the commission and each line 13 of the transit agencies located in the San Francisco Bay area. line 14 (2)  In undertaking the duties set forth in paragraph (1), the line 15 Transportation Agency shall consult with impacted stakeholders, line 16 included, but not limited to, impacted transit agencies, transit line 17 unions, transit riders, and local governments. line 18 (3)  If the Transportation Agency selects the University of line 19 California Institute of Transportation Studies to complete the line 20 assessment, the requirement to complete the assessment shall only line 21 apply to the University of California to the extent that the Regents line 22 of the University of California, by appropriate resolution, make line 23 that requirement applicable. line 24 (4)  In conducting the assessment, the transportation institute line 25 shall also study the impact that regional consolidation would have line 26 on wages, work conditions, pension, and retirement benefits of line 27 workers covered by collective bargaining agreements at relevant line 28 agencies. line 29 (5)  As part of the assessment, the transportation institute shall line 30 provide recommendations on how to consolidate those transit line 31 agencies in a manner that does all of the following: line 32 (A)  Prioritizes cost savings to the public, the adoption of line 33 advanced technology, and other efficiencies. line 34 (B)  Meets and exceeds climate goals. line 35 (C)  Improves the speed of transit and the seamlessness of line 36 transfers. line 37 (D)  Advances any other improvements to transit operations. line 38 (6) line 39 (2)  The transportation institute shall identify, identify each line 40 transit agency that has authority to create policy or assess charges 97 SB 1031 — 7 — 40 line 1 with regard to transit and that is located in the San Francisco Bay line 2 area and, at a minimum, all of the following information in the line 3 assessment: line 4 (A)  Each transit agency, and each agency that has authority to line 5 create policy or assess charges with regard to transit, that is located line 6 in the San Francisco Bay area and whether the governing body of line 7 those agencies is appointed or elected. line 8 (B)  The size of the membership, terms of service of the line 9 members, and whether the members are voting members, for each line 10 governing body of an agency described in subparagraph (A). line 11 (C)  Whether the governing body of an agency described in line 12 subparagraph (A) was created pursuant to state statute, local line 13 ordinance, city charter, federal law, or ballot measure or initiative. line 14 (D)  The county where each agency described in subparagraph line 15 (A) and its governing body is located. line 16 (E)  Any qualifications required to serve as a member of the line 17 governing board of an agency described in subparagraph (A). line 18 (A)  The county where each transit agency and its governing line 19 body is located. line 20 (B)  The governance structure of each transit agency, including line 21 all of the following information: line 22 (i)  The size of the membership, terms of service of the members, line 23 and whether the members are voting members, and whether the line 24 governing body of those agencies is appointed or elected. line 25 (ii)  Any qualifications required to serve as a member of the line 26 governing board of the transit agency. line 27 (iii)  Whether the governing body of the transit agency was line 28 created pursuant to state law, local ordinance, city charter, federal line 29 law, or ballot measure or initiative. line 30 (F) line 31 (C)  The funding structures, including any tax assessments, and line 32 revenue mechanisms, including any temporary or permanent state line 33 or federal support, or both, established for each agency described line 34 in subparagraph (A). transit agency. line 35 (G) line 36 (D)  The fares or other fees imposed on riders by each transit line 37 agency and the available routes provided by each transit agency. line 38 (H) line 39 (E)  The fleet type and size of each transit agency. line 40 (I) 97 — 8 — SB 1031 41 line 1 (F)  The programs and services offered to riders by each transit line 2 agency, including any subsidies or discounts offered to riders. line 3 (J) line 4 (G)  The workforce size and type of each agency described in line 5 subparagraph (A), transit agency, whether there are any applicable line 6 labor contracts for that workforce, and the socioeconomic makeup line 7 of that workforce. line 8 (K) line 9 (H)  The socioeconomic makeup of the riders of each transit line 10 agency. line 11 (L)  The continuity of travel between public transit systems line 12 operated by different transit agencies and between different services line 13 or programs operated by the same transit agency. line 14 (M)  Infrastructure gaps between routes of regional travel. line 15 (N)  Service gaps between routes of travel. line 16 (O)  Existing and planned regional network management efforts, line 17 including efforts to modify and improve the commission’s regional line 18 network management authority, and how consolidation would line 19 relate to, or impact, those efforts. line 20 (I)  The number and rate of transfers between public transit line 21 services operated by different agencies. line 22 (J)  An analysis of existing transit service gaps compared to line 23 regional travel patterns and how it relates to transit agencies’ line 24 boundaries. line 25 (3)  The assessment shall analyze the benefits and disbenefits to line 26 riders, and the administrative, financial, legal, contractual, and line 27 governance feasibility, of various forms of consolidation among line 28 transit agencies that are located within the San Francisco Bay line 29 area. line 30 (4)  The assessment shall consider all of the following: line 31 (A)  The impacts of consolidation on all of the following: line 32 (i)  Wages, work conditions, and pension and retirement benefits line 33 of workers covered by collective bargaining agreements at relevant line 34 agencies and contracted services. line 35 (ii)  Operating budgets. line 36 (iii)  Existing costs. line 37 (iv)  Costs associated with implementation. line 38 (v)  Governance. line 39 (vi)  The total number of people employed and employment line 40 opportunities. 97 SB 1031 — 9 — 42 line 1 (B)  Challenges associated with any form of consolidation, line 2 including consolidation of transit agencies with different service line 3 modes, rolling stock, and technologies, and with other key line 4 operational differences across agencies. line 5 (C)  Regulatory and legal barriers to any form of consolidation. line 6 (D)  Existing and planned regional network management efforts, line 7 including efforts to modify and improve the commission’s regional line 8 network management authority, and how consolidation would line 9 relate to, or impact, those efforts. line 10 (5)  If the Transportation Agency selects the University of line 11 California Institute of Transportation Studies to conduct the line 12 assessment, the requirement to conduct the assessment shall only line 13 apply to the University of California to the extent that the Regents line 14 of the University of California, by appropriate resolution, make line 15 that requirement applicable. line 16 (c) line 17 (d)  (1)  Based on the findings of the assessment conducted line 18 pursuant to subdivision (b), (c), the Transportation Agency shall line 19 recommend a comprehensive plan to consolidate all of the transit line 20 agencies that are located in the San Francisco Bay area. develop line 21 a report of recommendations to the Legislature. The Transportation line 22 Agency shall complete the plan report on or before January 1, line 23 2027, and, upon completion, shall submit the plan report to the line 24 Legislature in compliance with Section 9795, and to the line 25 commission and each of the transit agencies located in the San line 26 Francisco Bay area. In the plan, report, the Transportation Agency line 27 shall do all of the following: line 28 (1)  Design the plan in a manner that provides benefits to riders, line 29 including paratransit riders, and that does all of the following: line 30 (A)  Improves access to routes and services, including across line 31 city and county boundaries, and improves connections to regional line 32 and interregional transit service in a manner that competes with line 33 private automobile travel. line 34 (B)  Maintains affordable fares and reliable, safe, and efficient line 35 service. line 36 (C)  Improves and simplifies the accountability of the line 37 transportation system to the public and riders. line 38 (D)  Supports greater efficiency and cost-effectiveness, and line 39 reduces administrative costs. 97 — 10 — SB 1031 43 line 1 (E)  Provides more equitable access to quality, connected transit line 2 services to communities throughout the region. line 3 (2)  (A)  Identify opportunities to consolidate agencies and line 4 provide specific recommendations for the consolidation or line 5 elimination of transit agencies and their governing bodies without line 6 resulting in the elimination of programs and transportation services. line 7 (B)  For the purposes of this paragraph, “consolidation” may line 8 include reforms to transit agencies that include one or more of the line 9 following: line 10 (i)  Combining staffs of transit agencies. line 11 (ii)  Replacing multiple governing boards with a unified line 12 governing board representing a broader jurisdiction. line 13 (iii)  Creating an umbrella structure under which existing transit line 14 agencies are brought together but still operate as distinct divisions line 15 with separate governing boards. line 16 (A)  Identify opportunities to consolidate two or more agencies line 17 and provide specific recommendations for the consolidation or line 18 elimination of transit agencies and their governing bodies without line 19 resulting in the elimination of programs and transportation line 20 services, with consideration for existing and planned regional line 21 network management efforts or structures. line 22 (B)  Identify steps to maintain and transfer labor agreements line 23 and bargaining units to maintain employee wages, benefits, line 24 protections, and working conditions secured by those agreements. line 25 (C)  Identify barriers to the consolidation or elimination of line 26 transit agencies, including local, state, or federal laws, and line 27 alternative actions to the consolidation or elimination of those line 28 agencies. line 29 (D)  Recommend opportunities for securing federal, state, and line 30 local moneys that can be used to fund consolidation. line 31 (E)  Recommend a strategy for a public education and outreach line 32 program on any proposed consolidation efforts. line 33 (3)  Recommend line 34 (2)  If the Transportation Agency recommends a new governing line 35 structure and governing board member qualifications, as line 36 appropriate, for a new consolidated agency or agencies based line 37 agencies, the Transportation Agency shall base that line 38 recommendation on research of effective international models of line 39 transit delivery excellence, and consideration of recent regional line 40 and state studies of effective transit governance. In making these 97 SB 1031 — 11 — 44 line 1 recommendations, a recommendation described in this paragraph, line 2 the Transportation Agency shall do both all of the following: line 3 (A)  Identify any future legislative steps required to implement line 4 the recommended governing structure. line 5 (B)  Consider other reforms necessary to ensure that commission line 6 policy is democratically accountable and serves the regional line 7 welfare. line 8 (4)  Identify and describe any relationship or impacts of the line 9 recommendations or elements of the plan on existing and planned line 10 regional network management efforts or structures. line 11 (5)  Identify necessary local, state, or federal laws that may line 12 impact efforts to implement the consolidation of the transit line 13 agencies. line 14 (6)  Identify steps, in consultation with impacted stakeholders, line 15 to maintain and transfer labor agreements and bargaining units to line 16 maintain employee wages, benefits, protections, and working line 17 conditions secured by those agreements. line 18 (7)  Identify barriers to consolidating or eliminating transit line 19 agencies and alternative actions, including memorandums of line 20 understanding between transit agencies, for the consolidation of line 21 services. line 22 (8)  Describe the steps necessary for, and the feasibility of, line 23 interoffice and interagency coordination of programs, services, line 24 and resources for riders if consolidation is not feasible. line 25 (9)  Recommend opportunities for securing federal, state, and line 26 local moneys that can be used to fund consolidation. line 27 (10)  Recommend a strategy for a public education and outreach line 28 program on any proposed consolidation efforts and any proposed line 29 coordination services and programs. line 30 (C)  Assess any impact that consolidation would have on wages, line 31 work conditions, and pension and retirement benefits of workers line 32 covered by collective bargaining agreements at the relevant transit line 33 agencies, including paratransit and other contracted services. line 34 (3)  The Transportation Agency may contract with a consultant line 35 to complete the report required pursuant to this subdivision if the line 36 Transportation Agency does both of the following: line 37 (A)  Establishes a team to advise the consultant that, at minimum, line 38 includes a transportation institute and a labor institute, if they line 39 choose to participate, and that may additionally include, as needed, 97 — 12 — SB 1031 45 line 1 individuals with expertise in the legal, governance, financial, and line 2 operational aspects of public transportation in the state. line 3 (B)  Oversees the consultant consistent with subdivision (b). line 4 (d) line 5 (e)  (1)  The Bay Area Transit Consolidation and Coordination line 6 Technical Assistance Fund is hereby established in the State line 7 Treasury for the deposit of moneys that can be used for the line 8 following purposes: line 9 (A)  Paying for the cost of conducting the assessment pursuant line 10 to subdivision (b) (c) and preparing the comprehensive plan report line 11 pursuant to subdivision (c). (d). line 12 (B)  Paying for administrative expenses related to the line 13 implementation of the consolidation of transit agencies located in line 14 the San Francisco Bay area, if those consolidations occur. line 15 (2)  Any moneys deposited into the fund, including moneys line 16 deposited into the fund pursuant to Section 66538.40, shall be line 17 available to the Transportation Agency, upon appropriation by the line 18 Legislature, for the purposes described in paragraph (1). line 19 (3)  The Transportation Agency may accept private donations line 20 to be used for the purposes described in this section. Any donations line 21 received pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited into the fund line 22 established pursuant to paragraph (1). line 23 SEC. 4. Section 65081 of the Government Code is amended line 24 to read: line 25 65081. (a)  It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage line 26 metropolitan planning organizations and local air quality line 27 management districts or air pollution control districts to work with line 28 local employers to adopt policies that encourage commuting by line 29 means other than driving alone. To encourage this, the Legislature line 30 hereby establishes a program in that regard in the greater San line 31 Francisco Bay Area. line 32 (b)  Notwithstanding Section 40717.9 of the Health and Safety line 33 Code, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the line 34 Metropolitan Transportation Commission with respect to the line 35 common area within their respective jurisdictions may jointly adopt line 36 a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers line 37 operating within the common area of the district and commission line 38 to offer all covered employees one of the following choices: line 39 (1)  A pretax option: a program, consistent with Section 132(f) line 40 of the Internal Revenue Code, allowing covered employees to elect 97 SB 1031 — 13 — 46 line 1 to exclude from taxable wages employee commuting costs incurred line 2 for transit passes or vanpool charges, up to the maximum amount line 3 allowed by federal tax law. line 4 (2)  Employer-paid benefit: a program whereby the covered line 5 employer offers employees a subsidy to offset the monthly cost line 6 of commuting via public transit or by vanpool, or, in addition, and line 7 at the employer’s discretion, by bicycle. The subsidy shall be equal line 8 to either the monthly cost of commuting via public transit or by line 9 vanpool, or seventy-five dollars ($75), whichever is lower. The line 10 seventy-five dollar ($75) amount shall be adjusted annually line 11 consistent with the California Consumer Price Index. If the covered line 12 employer chooses to offer a subsidy to offset the monthly cost of line 13 commuting by bicycle, the subsidy shall be either the monthly cost line 14 of commuting by bicycle or twenty dollars ($20), whichever is line 15 lower. line 16 (3)  Employer-provided transit: transportation furnished by the line 17 covered employer at no cost, or low cost as determined by the line 18 district or commission, to the covered employee in a vanpool or line 19 bus, or similar multipassenger vehicle operated by or for the line 20 employer. line 21 (4)  Employer-provided regional transit pass: a program whereby line 22 the covered employer offers covered employees a subsidy in the line 23 form of a universal regional transit pass to offset the monthly cost line 24 of commuting via public transit. line 25 (c)  Nothing in this section shall prevent a covered employer line 26 from offering a more generous commuter benefit that is otherwise line 27 consistent with the requirements of the applicable commute benefit line 28 ordinance. Nothing in this section shall require employees to line 29 change their behavior. line 30 (d)  An employer offering, or proposing to offer, an alternative line 31 commuter benefit on the employer’s own initiative, or an employer line 32 otherwise required to offer an alternative commuter benefit as a line 33 condition of a lease, original building permit, or other similar line 34 requirement, if the alternative is not one of the options identified line 35 in subdivision (b), may seek approval of the alternative from the line 36 district or commission. The district or commission may approve line 37 an alternative if it determines that the alternative provides at least line 38 the same benefit in terms of reducing single-occupant vehicle trips line 39 as any of the options in subdivision (b). An employer that offers line 40 an approved alternative to covered employees in a manner 97 — 14 — SB 1031 47 line 1 otherwise consistent with this section is not required to offer one line 2 of the options in subdivision (b). line 3 (e)  The commute benefit ordinance shall provide covered line 4 employers with at least six months to comply after the ordinance line 5 is adopted. line 6 (f)  An employer that participates in or is represented by a line 7 transportation management association that provides the employer’s line 8 covered employees with any of the benefits in subdivision (b), or line 9 an alternative benefit determined by the district or commission line 10 pursuant to subdivision (d) to provide at least the same benefit in line 11 terms of reducing single-occupant vehicle trips as any of the line 12 options in subdivision (b), shall be deemed in compliance with the line 13 regional ordinance, and the transportation management association line 14 may act on behalf of those employers in that regard. The district line 15 or commission shall communicate directly with the transportation line 16 management association, rather than the participating employers, line 17 to determine compliance with the ordinance. line 18 (g)  A commute benefit ordinance adopted pursuant to this line 19 section shall specify all of the following: line 20 (1)  How the implementing agencies will inform covered line 21 employers about the ordinance. line 22 (2)  How compliance with the ordinance will be demonstrated. line 23 (3)  The procedures for proposing and the criteria that will be line 24 used to evaluate an alternative commuter benefit pursuant to line 25 subdivision (d). line 26 (4)  Any consequences for noncompliance. line 27 (h)  Nothing in this section shall limit or restrict the statutory or line 28 regulatory authority of the commission or district. line 29 (i)  The commission shall not use federal planning funds in the line 30 implementation of the commute benefit ordinance. line 31 (j)  (1)  Notwithstanding subdivisions (b) and (d), the commission line 32 may may, either directly or through a qualified voter initiative, line 33 propose a ballot measure in all nine counties of the San Francisco line 34 Bay area or a subset of those counties as part of a measure line 35 proposed pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 66538) line 36 of Title 7.1 and subject to the election procedures set forth in that line 37 division to update the ordinance adopted pursuant to this section line 38 to do both of the following: line 39 (A)  Require a covered employer that is located in proximity to line 40 transit to purchase a regional transit pass for each of its employees 97 SB 1031 — 15 — 48 line 1 that provides universal and unlimited access to transit services line 2 provided by transit agencies operating in the common area within line 3 the jurisdiction of the district and the commission. line 4 (B)  Require a covered employer that is not located in proximity line 5 to transit to provide a subsidy to each of its employees line 6 corresponding in financial value to the regional transit pass line 7 described in subparagraph (A) to encourage commuting to work line 8 by means other than driving alone. line 9 (2)  Consistent with subdivision (b) of Section 66538.20, if the line 10 update to the ordinance is proposed in a subset of the counties of line 11 the San Francisco Bay area, the update to the ordinance authorized line 12 in paragraph (1) shall apply only in those counties in which the line 13 measure was submitted to the voters. line 14 (3)  Notwithstanding subdivisions (b) and (d), if a ballot measure line 15 described in paragraph (1) is approved, the commission and the line 16 district shall update the ordinance adopted pursuant to this section line 17 to require covered employers to provide covered employees with line 18 the applicable commuting benefit set forth in subparagraphs (A) line 19 and (B) of paragraph (1) instead of requiring covered employers line 20 to offer the choices described in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, line 21 of subdivision (b). line 22 (k)  As used in this section, the following definitions apply: line 23 (1)  “Covered employer” means any employer for which an line 24 average of 50 or more employees per week perform work for line 25 compensation within the area where the ordinance adopted pursuant line 26 to this section operates. In determining the number of employees line 27 performing work for an employer during a given week, only line 28 employees performing work on a full-time basis shall be counted. line 29 (2)  “Covered employee” means an employee who performed line 30 at least an average of 20 hours of work per week within the line 31 previous calendar month within the area where the ordinance line 32 adopted pursuant to this section operates. line 33 (3)  “District” means the Bay Area Air Quality Management line 34 District. line 35 (4)  “Commission” means the Metropolitan Transportation line 36 Commission. line 37 SEC. 5. The heading of Division 1 (commencing with Section line 38 66500) is added to Title 7.1 of the Government Code, to read: 97 — 16 — SB 1031 49 line 1 line 2 DIVISION 1. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION line 3 COMMISSION line 4 line 5 SEC. 5. line 6 SEC. 6. Section 66516 of the Government Code is amended line 7 to read: line 8 66516. (a)  (1)  The commission shall be responsible for line 9 implementing a seamless transit rider experience across the region. line 10 To implement this responsibility, the commission shall adopt, and line 11 update as necessary, rules and regulations to promote the line 12 coordination of fares, including fare payment methods and transit line 13 fare integration, schedules, mapping and wayfinding, real-time line 14 transit information, and other customer-facing operating policies line 15 that would benefit from a regional approach for all public transit line 16 agencies within its jurisdiction. line 17 (2)  It is the intent of the Legislature that the commission’s rules line 18 and regulations adopted pursuant to paragraph (1) be based on the line 19 central goal of increasing transit ridership by improving the line 20 customer experience of riding public transit in the San Francisco line 21 Bay area and creating a seamless experience across all public line 22 transit agencies providing service in the commission’s jurisdiction. line 23 (3)  The commission shall require every system to enter into a line 24 joint fare revenue sharing agreement with connecting systems line 25 consistent with the commission’s rules and regulations. line 26 (b)  Notwithstanding any other law, each public transit agency line 27 within the region shall comply with the commission’s rules and line 28 regulations adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) as a condition of line 29 receiving any of the following funds: line 30 (1)  Any funds allocated pursuant to Sections 99313 and 99314 line 31 of the Public Utilities Code, consistent with Section 99314.7 of line 32 the Public Utilities Code. line 33 (2)  Any funds allocated from a local transportation fund line 34 administered pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section line 35 99230) of Chapter 4 of Part 11 of Division 10 of the Public Utilities line 36 Code, consistent with subdivision (b) of Section 99270.5 of the line 37 Public Utilities Code. line 38 (3)  Any funds allocated pursuant to Division 2 (commencing line 39 with Section 66538). 97 SB 1031 — 17 — 50 line 1 (c)  In designating the commission with the responsibility set line 2 forth in subdivision (a), it is the intent of the Legislature that the line 3 commission implement and sustain the following outcomes: line 4 (1)  A common fare payment system for public transit agencies line 5 in the region. line 6 (2)  A universal regional transit pass that is valid on all public line 7 transit agencies in the region. line 8 (3)  An integrated transit fare structure with common definitions line 9 for adults, youth, seniors, persons with disabilities, and other line 10 categories of riders. line 11 (4)  A common fare transfer policy that strives to eliminate any line 12 extra fare for using more than one transit system on a single line 13 journey. line 14 (5)  Integrated mapping, signage, and real-time schedule line 15 information that makes transit in the region easy to navigate and line 16 convenient for both new and existing riders. line 17 (6)  Transit services in the region that are equitably planned and line 18 integrally managed as a unified, efficient, and reliable network, line 19 including interagency transfer policies and coordinating schedules line 20 at stops or station areas serving more than one public transit line 21 agency. line 22 (7)  Transit services for older adults, people with disabilities, line 23 and those with lower incomes that are coordinated efficiently line 24 throughout the region. line 25 (8)  Resources are invested to provide for the comfort and safety line 26 of transit riders. line 27 (9)  The transit network in the region uses its existing resources line 28 more efficiently and secures new, dedicated revenue to meet its line 29 capital and operating needs. line 30 (d)  Nothing in this section authorizes the commission to do any line 31 of the following: line 32 (1)  Restrict a public transit agency’s access to funds not line 33 allocated by the commission. line 34 (2)  Require a public transit agency to implement policies or line 35 programs that would impede or interfere with its ability to comply line 36 with any legal obligations in transit labor contracts. line 37 (3)  Restrict the use of a public transit agency’s logo outside the line 38 scope of the commission’s regional mapping and wayfinding line 39 standards. 97 — 18 — SB 1031 51 line 1 (4)  Require that a public transit agency modify the schedule or line 2 route of a specific local route that the transit agency and the line 3 commission do not identify as primarily serving regional transit line 4 service. line 5 (e)  (1)  The commission shall not require a public transit agency line 6 to be subject to a one-time or ongoing policy, or to make a one-time line 7 or ongoing expenditure, pursuant to subdivision (a) if the public line 8 transit agency adopts a finding that the policy or expenditure would line 9 require the agency to take an action that the agency determines line 10 to be unacceptable with respect to its impact on transit service, line 11 staffing, maintenance, or other specified operational or state of line 12 good repair considerations. line 13 (2)  Before adopting a finding pursuant to this subdivision, a line 14 public transit agency shall conduct an assessment that takes into line 15 consideration all funding anticipated to be available to the public line 16 transit agency in the next fiscal year, including, but not limited to, line 17 any discretionary funding that the commission identifies to help line 18 offset the cost of the proposed expenditure or policy, any growth line 19 in fare revenue anticipated as a result of the expenditure or policy, line 20 and potential adjustments to fares or fare policies the agency could line 21 make to increase revenue. The public transit agency shall develop line 22 the assessment in consultation with staff from the commission and line 23 shall present it to the commission at a public meeting in advance line 24 of adopting a finding pursuant to this subdivision. line 25 (3)  At the request of the commission, a public transit agency line 26 may be required to update its assessment conducted pursuant to line 27 paragraph (2) and make a subsequent finding in future fiscal years. line 28 (d) line 29 (f)  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that line 30 would strengthen regional network management within the region, line 31 including the possibility of establishing a body within the line 32 commission to guide regional network management efforts. line 33 (e) line 34 (g)  In implementing this section, each public transit agency in line 35 the region shall fulfill all applicable requirements under Title VI line 36 of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) line 37 regarding service and fare changes. line 38 (f) line 39 (h)  (1)  The commission shall submit a report to the Legislature line 40 on or before January 1, 2026, and each year thereafter, on the status 97 SB 1031 — 19 — 52 line 1 of the outcomes described in subdivision (c) and the status of transit line 2 ridership in the region. The commission shall submit the annual line 3 report to the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795. line 4 (2)  The commission shall also post the annual report described line 5 in paragraph (1) on its internet website. line 6 (g) line 7 (i)  For purposes of this section, “public transit agency” has the line 8 same meaning as “STA-eligible operator,” as defined in Section line 9 99312.2 of the Public Utilities Code. line 10 SEC. 6. The heading of Division 1 (commencing with Section line 11 66500) is added to Title 7.1 of the Government Code, to read: line 12 line 13 DIVISION 1. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION line 14 COMMISSION line 15 line 16 SEC. 7. Division 2 (commencing with Section 66538) is added line 17 to Title 7.1 of the Government Code, to read: line 18 line 19 DIVISION 2. TAXING AUTHORITY AND line 20 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING line 21 line 22 Chapter 1. Definitions line 23 line 24 66538. For purposes of this division, the following definitions line 25 apply: line 26 (a)  “Commission” means the Metropolitan Transportation line 27 Commission created pursuant to Section 66502. line 28 (b)  “Public transit agency” has the same meaning as line 29 “STA-eligible operator,” as defined in Section 99312.2 of the line 30 Public Utilities Code. line 31 (c)  “San Francisco Bay area” has the same meaning as “region,” line 32 as defined in Section 66502. line 33 line 34 Chapter 2. Special Taxes line 35 line 36 66538.20. (a)  The commission, either directly or through a line 37 qualified voter initiative, may raise and allocate new revenue line 38 through all of the following funding mechanisms: line 39 (1)  A retail transactions and use tax, as provided in Section line 40 66538.22. 97 — 20 — SB 1031 53 line 1 (2)  A regional payroll tax, as provided in Section 66538.24. line 2 (3)  A parcel tax, as provided in Section 66538.26. line 3 (4)  A regional vehicle registration surcharge, as provided in line 4 Section 66538.28. line 5 (b)  Any funding mechanism or combination of funding line 6 mechanisms authorized pursuant to subdivision (a) that requires line 7 voter approval pursuant to the California Constitution may be line 8 placed on the ballot in all or a subset of the nine counties in the line 9 San Francisco Bay area. A measure placed on the ballot in a subset line 10 of those nine counties shall apply only in those counties in which line 11 the measure was submitted to the voters. line 12 (c)  In addition to the procedures set forth in Chapter 4 line 13 (commencing with Section 9300) of Division 9 of the Elections line 14 Code, if an ordinance containing a tax authorized by this chapter line 15 is proposed by an initiative petition, the initiative shall require the line 16 proceeds of the tax to be expended consistent with Chapter 4 line 17 (commencing with Section 66538.40). line 18 66538.22. (a)  The commission may may, either directly or line 19 through a qualified voter initiative, impose a retail transactions line 20 and use tax ordinance applicable in the San Francisco Bay area in line 21 accordance with this division and Part 1.6 (commencing with line 22 Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. line 23 (b)  The commission, in the ordinance, shall state the nature of line 24 the tax to be imposed, shall provide the tax rate or the maximum line 25 tax rate, shall specify the period during which the tax will be line 26 imposed, and shall specify the purposes for which the revenue line 27 derived from the tax will be used. The tax rate shall be in 1⁄4 percent line 28 increments. line 29 (c)  Notwithstanding Section 7251.1 of the Revenue and Taxation line 30 Code, the tax rate authorized pursuant to this section shall not be line 31 considered for purposes of the combined rate limit established by line 32 Section 7251.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. line 33 (d)  Any transactions and use tax ordinance adopted pursuant to line 34 this chapter shall be operative on the first day of the first calendar line 35 quarter commencing more than 110 days after adoption of the line 36 ordinance. line 37 (e)  Before the operative date of the ordinance, the commission line 38 shall contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee line 39 Administration to perform all functions incidental to the line 40 administration and operation of the ordinance. 97 SB 1031 — 21 — 54 line 1 66538.24. (a)  The commission may, either directly or through line 2 a qualified voter initiative, by ordinance, impose a tax on every line 3 employer in the San Francisco Bay area, except an employer line 4 defined by Section 676, 684, or 685 of the Unemployment line 5 Insurance Code, at a percentage, as determined by the commission, line 6 of wages paid to an individual. line 7 (b)  If the commission acts pursuant to the authorization in line 8 subdivision (a), the commission shall contract with the line 9 Employment Development Department to perform all functions line 10 incidental to the administration and operation of the tax. line 11 (c)  The tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the line 12 same time as any contributions required under Sections 977 and line 13 977.5 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, except as provided line 14 in this section. line 15 66538.26. (a)  Subject to Section 4 of Article XIII A of the line 16 California Constitution, the commission may may, either directly line 17 or through a qualified voter initiative, impose, by ordinance, a line 18 parcel tax within the San Francisco Bay area pursuant to the line 19 procedures established in Article 3.5 (commencing with Section line 20 50075) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5, Chapter 3 line 21 (commencing with Section 66538.30), and any other applicable line 22 procedures provided by law. line 23 (b)  For purposes of this section, “parcel tax” means a special line 24 tax imposed upon a parcel of real property at a rate that is line 25 determined without regard to that property’s value. line 26 (c)  The commission shall provide notice of any parcel tax line 27 imposed pursuant to this section in the manner specified in Section line 28 54930. line 29 (d)  The parcel tax shall be collected in the same manner as line 30 ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be line 31 subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale, and line 32 lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem line 33 taxes. line 34 (e)  A parcel tax levied pursuant to this section shall be line 35 administered in the following manner: line 36 (1)  Taxes collected shall be deposited into a separate fund, which line 37 shall be established in the treasury of each county and used only line 38 as prescribed by this division. 97 — 22 — SB 1031 55 line 1 (2)  The county shall transfer moneys from the fund to the line 2 commission periodically as promptly as feasible. The transmittals line 3 shall be made at least twice in each calendar quarter. line 4 (3)  The county may deduct incremental costs associated with line 5 administering any taxes approved pursuant to this section from line 6 the portion transferred to the commission pursuant to paragraph line 7 (2). line 8 66538.28. (a)  The commission may, either directly or through line 9 a qualified voter initiative, by ordinance, impose a regional vehicle line 10 registration surcharge on each motor vehicle registered within the line 11 San Francisco Bay area. The commission shall not propose a line 12 measure to the electors to approve a surcharge pursuant to this line 13 section before January 1, 2030. line 14 (b)  The commission may determine the rate of the regional line 15 vehicle registration surcharge subject to all of the following line 16 requirements: line 17 (1)  The surcharge shall be paid on an annual basis and shall be line 18 collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles at the same time line 19 and same manner as the vehicle registration pursuant to Section line 20 9250.3 9250 of the Vehicle Code. line 21 (2)  The amount of the surcharge shall be based on the market line 22 value of the vehicle, as determined by the Department of Motor line 23 Vehicles pursuant to Sections 10753, 10753.2, and 10753.5 of the line 24 Revenue and Taxation Code, using the same vehicle ranges set line 25 forth in the schedule established pursuant to Section 11052 of the line 26 Revenue and Taxation Code. line 27 (3)  The surcharge amount applicable to each vehicle range in line 28 the schedule described in paragraph (2) shall be set in amounts line 29 that increase based on the increasing value of each vehicle range. line 30 (4)  Beginning one year after an ordinance imposing a surcharge line 31 is approved by the voters, the amount of the surcharge in each line 32 vehicle market range shall be adjusted in an amount equal to the line 33 increase in the California Consumer Price Index for the prior year, line 34 as calculated by the Department of Finance, with amounts equal line 35 to or greater than fifty cents ($0.50) rounded to the highest whole line 36 dollar. The incremental change shall be added to the associated line 37 fee rate for that year. line 38 (c)  If an ordinance imposing a regional vehicle registration line 39 surcharge is approved by the voters pursuant to Chapter 3 line 40 (commencing with Section 66538.30), the surcharge shall apply 97 SB 1031 — 23 — 56 line 1 to the original vehicle registration occurring on or after six months line 2 following the adoption of the ordinance by the voters and to a line 3 renewal of registration with an expiration date on or after that line 4 six-month period. line 5 line 6 Chapter 3. Election Procedures line 7 line 8 66538.30. (a)  If the commission, either directly or through line 9 qualified voter initiative, proposes a measure pursuant to Chapter line 10 2 (commencing with Section 66538.20) that requires voter approval line 11 pursuant to the California Constitution, the board of supervisors line 12 of the county or counties in which the commission has determined line 13 to place the measure on the ballot shall call a special election on line 14 the measure. The special election shall be held no sooner than line 15 November 2026 and shall be consolidated with the next regularly line 16 scheduled statewide election. The measure shall be submitted to line 17 the voters in the appropriate counties, consistent with the line 18 requirements of Articles XIII A, XIII C, and XIII, or Article XVI, line 19 of the California Constitution, as applicable. line 20 (b)  For the purpose of placement of a measure on the ballot, the line 21 commission is a district, as defined in Section 317 of the Elections line 22 Code. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a measure line 23 proposed by the commission that requires voter approval shall be line 24 submitted to the voters of the counties, as determined by the line 25 commission, in accordance with the provisions of the Elections line 26 Code applicable to districts, including Chapter 4 (commencing line 27 with Section 9300) of Division 9 of the Elections Code. line 28 (c)  Notwithstanding any provision of the Elections Code, the line 29 legal counsel for the commission shall prepare an impartial analysis line 30 of the measure. Each county included in the measure shall use the line 31 election materials provided by the commission, including the exact line 32 ballot question, impartial analysis, and full text of the ballot line 33 measure for inclusion in the county voter information guide. line 34 (d)  If two or more counties included in the measure are required line 35 to prepare a translation of ballot materials into the same language line 36 other than English, the county that contains the largest population, line 37 as determined by the most recent federal decennial census, among line 38 those counties that are required to prepare a translation of ballot line 39 materials into the same language other than English shall prepare line 40 the translation, or authorize the commission to prepare the 97 — 24 — SB 1031 57 line 1 translation, and that translation shall be used by the other county line 2 or counties, as applicable. line 3 (e)  Notwithstanding Section 13116 of the Elections Code, the line 4 elections officials of the counties where the measure will appear line 5 on the ballot shall mutually agree to use the same letter designation line 6 for the measure. line 7 (f)  The county clerk of each county shall report the results of line 8 the special election to the commission. If the approval threshold line 9 required by the California Constitution at the time of the election line 10 is achieved, the measure shall take effect in the counties in which line 11 the measure appeared on the ballot within the timeframe specified line 12 in the measure. line 13 (g)  (1)  Notwithstanding Section 10520 of the Elections Code, line 14 for any election at which the commission, either directly or through line 15 qualified voter initiative, proposes a measure pursuant to line 16 subdivision (a) of Section 66538.20 that would generate revenues, line 17 the commission shall reimburse each county in which that measure line 18 appears on the ballot only for the incremental costs incurred by line 19 the county elections official related to submitting the measure to line 20 the voters with proceeds from the measure, or if the measure fails, line 21 with any eligible funds provided by the commission or other public line 22 or private entity. line 23 (2)  For purposes of this subdivision, “incremental costs” line 24 includes both of the following: line 25 (A)  The cost to prepare a translation of ballot materials into a line 26 language other than English by any county, as described in line 27 subdivision (d). line 28 (B)  The additional costs that exceed the costs incurred for other line 29 election races or ballot measures, if any, appearing on the same line 30 ballot in each county in which the measure appears on the ballot, line 31 including both of the following: line 32 (i)  The printing and mailing of ballot materials. line 33 (ii)  The canvass of the vote regarding the measure pursuant to line 34 Division 15 (commencing with Section 15000) of the Elections line 35 Code. line 36 (h)  If the voters approve new revenues pursuant to this section, line 37 the commission shall establish an independent oversight committee line 38 within six months of the effective date of the tax increase to ensure line 39 that any revenues generated pursuant to this section are expended line 40 consistent with the applicable requirements set forth in Chapter 4 97 SB 1031 — 25 — 58 line 1 (commencing with Section 66538.40). The committee may be line 2 consolidated with the oversight committee established pursuant line 3 to subdivision (h) of section Section 30923 of the Streets and line 4 Highways Code. Each representative shall be appointed by the line 5 applicable county board of supervisors. The oversight committee line 6 may request any documents from the commission to assist the line 7 committee in performing its functions. line 8 line 9 Chapter 4. Expenditures line 10 line 11 66538.40. (a)  Except as provided in subdivision (c), revenues line 12 generated pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section line 13 66538.20) shall only be used to fund any of the following line 14 transportation improvements in the San Francisco Bay area: line 15 (1)  Investments that support transit transformation, including line 16 all of the following: line 17 (A)  Sustaining, expanding, and improving transit service for line 18 current and future transit riders. line 19 (B)  Accelerating customer-focused initiatives outlined in the line 20 2020 Bay Area Transit Transformation Action Plan or successor line 21 plan adopted by the commission. line 22 (C)  Transit service improvements that San Francisco Bay area line 23 transit riders or residents identify as high-priority, including safety, line 24 cleanliness, and first-mile and last-mile connectivity. line 25 (D)  Zero-emission transit vehicles and infrastructure. line 26 (2)  Investments that support safe streets, including investments line 27 to transform local roads to support safety, equity, and climate line 28 goals, including through bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure line 29 investments, safe routes to transit, other safety enhancements, and line 30 pothole repair. line 31 (3)  Investments that support connectivity, including mobility line 32 improvements that close gaps and relieve bottlenecks in the line 33 transportation network in a climate-neutral manner. line 34 (4)  Investments that support climate resilience, including line 35 planning, design, and construction activities that protect line 36 transportation infrastructure and nearby communities from rising line 37 sea levels, flooding, wildfires, and extreme heat. line 38 (b)  (1)  The commission shall annually allocate a minimum of line 39 seven hundred fifty million dollars ($750,000,000) of the revenues line 40 generated pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 97 — 26 — SB 1031 59 line 1 66538.20) to fund investments consistent with the purposes set line 2 forth in subparagraphs (A) to (C), inclusive, of paragraph (1) of line 3 subdivision (a), including, without limitation, for payment of all line 4 indebtedness incurred and bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 5 line 5 (commencing with Section 66538.50), and the related costs set line 6 forth in that chapter. line 7 (2)  Notwithstanding any other law, the allocation made pursuant line 8 to paragraph (1) shall not impair, limit, or otherwise affect payment line 9 of any indebtedness incurred or bonds issued pursuant to Chapter line 10 5 (commencing with Section 66538.50), and the related costs set line 11 forth in that chapter. line 12 (c)  Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the commission may line 13 allocate revenues generated pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing line 14 with Section 66538.20) to the Transportation Agency for deposit line 15 into the Bay Area Transit Consolidation Technical Assistance line 16 Fund. The revenues allocated pursuant to this subdivision shall be line 17 used for the purposes specified in subdivision (d) of Section line 18 13978.9. line 19 (d)  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that line 20 would clarify roadway eligibility criteria for revenues generated line 21 pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 66538.20), line 22 including potential criteria around roadway capacity increases. line 23 (e)  It is the intent of the Legislature that the commission line 24 prioritize the following focus areas when distributing revenues line 25 generated pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section line 26 66538.20): line 27 (1)  Fund the operations of public transit agencies, including line 28 through providing resources to address operating shortfalls and line 29 ensuring existing resources are maintained and used effectively. line 30 In implementing this paragraph, the commission should prioritize line 31 the following: line 32 (A)  Maintaining transit service for riders who rely on transit as line 33 their primary mode of transportation. line 34 (B)  Prioritizing sustaining services used by the greatest number line 35 of transit riders. line 36 (2)  Enhance frequency of transit service and areas served where line 37 needed and financially sustainable. line 38 (3)  Create a seamless and convenient San Francisco Bay area line 39 transit system that attracts far more riders than the number of riders line 40 that used that system before January 1, 2025, by improving public 97 SB 1031 — 27 — 60 line 1 safety on transit and implementing the 2020 Bay Area Transit line 2 Transformation Action Plan. line 3 (4)  Make it safer and easier for people of all ages and abilities line 4 to get to where they need to go by preserving and enhancing access line 5 for all transportation system road users, including people walking, line 6 biking, and wheeling. line 7 (f)  (1)  A public transit agency shall maintain its existing line 8 commitment of local funds to transit operations in order to be line 9 eligible for an allocation of funds approved by the voters pursuant line 10 to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 66538.30). In order to be line 11 eligible for funding pursuant to this section, a public transit agency line 12 shall verify to the commission that it shall not supplant any sources line 13 of its operating revenue used for transit operations as reported to line 14 the Controller in the most recent fiscal year pursuant to Section line 15 99243 of the Public Utilities Code before the election approving line 16 the revenues imposed pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with line 17 Section 66538.20). line 18 (2)  Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a transit agency may reduce line 19 the amount of funding contributed towards their operating budget line 20 in proportion to any reduction in operating costs. line 21 (g)  In addition to the requirement set forth in subdivision (f), line 22 in order to be eligible for an allocation of funds approved by the line 23 voters pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 66538.30), line 24 a public transit agency shall be in compliance with the line 25 commission’s rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Section line 26 66516. line 27 (h)  The commission may retain, for its cost in administering line 28 this chapter, an amount not to exceed 1 percent of the revenues line 29 allocated by the commission. line 30 (i)  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that line 31 would require the commission to consider need and geographic line 32 balance in distributing regional transportation revenues. line 33 66538.40. (a)  Revenues generated pursuant to Chapter 2 line 34 (commencing with Section 66538.20) shall only be used to fund line 35 transportation improvements in the San Francisco Bay area, line 36 consistent with subdivision (c). line 37 (b)  (1)  Revenue measure expenditures shall reflect an equitable line 38 allocation of revenues throughout the counties that participated line 39 in the election approving the tax measure with not less than 70 line 40 percent of the revenues generated in each county being invested 97 — 28 — SB 1031 61 line 1 in projects and programs that benefit that county, including transit line 2 operations funding for transit agencies that serves riders of that line 3 county, over each five-year period that the tax is operative. line 4 (2)  The commission shall prepare and adopt a calculation at line 5 least once every two years to ensure the allocation of funds line 6 pursuant to this chapter complies with paragraph (1). line 7 (c)  The commission shall annually allocate revenues generated line 8 pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 66538.20) in a line 9 manner that achieves the following shares and that is consistent line 10 with the following requirements: line 11 (1)  Forty-five percent for investments that support transit line 12 transformation, as follows: line 13 (A)  For purposes of this chapter, transit transformation line 14 investments shall include all of the following: line 15 (i)  Sustaining, expanding, and improving transit service for line 16 current and future transit riders. line 17 (ii)  Accelerating customer-focused initiatives outlined in the line 18 2021 Bay Area Transit Transformation Action Plan or any line 19 successor plan adopted by the commission. line 20 (iii)  Developing and implementing customer-focused line 21 improvements, including, but not limited to, safety and cleanliness line 22 enhancements. line 23 (iv)  Zero-emission transit vehicles and infrastructure. line 24 (B)  The commission shall prioritize the following in allocating line 25 funds that support transit transformation: line 26 (i)  For the first five-year period of the tax, assisting transit line 27 operators in preventing service cuts. line 28 (ii)  After the end of the period described in clause (i), sustaining, line 29 expanding, and improving transit service for current and future line 30 transit riders, including through implementing the 2021 Bay Area line 31 Transit Transformation Action Plan and any successor plan line 32 adopted by the commission. line 33 (C)  The commission shall allocate no less than 40 percent of line 34 the total revenues required to be allocated pursuant to this line 35 paragraph to public transit agencies for investments that support line 36 transit transformation in accordance with the following: line 37 (i)  The commission shall allocate the revenues made available line 38 pursuant to this subparagraph by county based on the share of the line 39 revenue generated in each county. 97 SB 1031 — 29 — 62 line 1 (ii)  A public transit agency shall be eligible to request an line 2 apportionment from the allocation for each county pursuant to line 3 clause (i) in which it provides service. line 4 (iii)  The commission shall determine the amount to be line 5 apportioned to each public transit agency that requests an line 6 apportionment consistent with subparagraph (E) and shall update line 7 that apportionment at least once every two years. line 8 (D)  After allocating funds pursuant to subparagraph (C), the line 9 commission shall use any remaining funds available under this line 10 paragraph for investments that support transit transformation. line 11 (E)  In allocating funds pursuant to subparagraphs (C) and (D), line 12 the commission shall ensure that all of the following conditions line 13 are met: line 14 (i)  Not less than twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) line 15 annually shall be apportioned to each public transit agency that line 16 meets either of the following ridership thresholds: line 17 (I)  The public transit agency provides more than 5,000,000 line 18 unlinked passenger trips per year. line 19 (II)  The public transit agency carries riders more than line 20 25,000,000 passenger miles per year. line 21 (ii)  Not less than ten million dollars ($10,000,000) annually line 22 shall be apportioned to small public transit agencies in counties line 23 where those small public transit agencies provide a combined line 24 3,000,000 or greater unlinked passenger trips per year. line 25 (iii)  Not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000) annually line 26 shall be apportioned to small public transit agencies in each county line 27 with small public transit agencies providing less than 3,000,000 line 28 unlinked passenger trips per year. line 29 (iv)  The amounts specified in clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, shall line 30 be adjusted at least once every five years in proportion to the rate line 31 of increase in revenues during the years preceding the adjustment. line 32 (v)  For the purposes of this subparagraph, “small public transit line 33 agency” means a public transit agency that does not meet the line 34 service threshold described in clause (i). line 35 (2)  Not less than 25 percent for investments that support safe line 36 streets, as follows: line 37 (A)  Eligible investments shall include projects to transform line 38 local streets and roads to support safety, social equity, and climate line 39 goals, including, but not limited to, any of the following projects: 97 — 30 — SB 1031 63 line 1 (i)  Enhancements to pedestrian safety on sidewalks, crosswalks, line 2 and midblock segments with an emphasis on improvements near line 3 community facilities such as schools, business districts, and line 4 shopping areas. line 5 (ii)  Modifications to intersections, including adjustments to line 6 signal timing, designed to slow vehicle speeds and reduce conflicts line 7 between vehicles and vulnerable road users. line 8 (iii)  Safety and accessibility improvements to transit stops, line 9 including the cost of relocating them. line 10 (iv)  Street surface repair and raised roadway treatments to line 11 reduce vehicle speeds. line 12 (v)  Improvements to drainage and stormwater infrastructure. line 13 (B)  Of the funds described in this paragraph, the commission line 14 shall allocate all of the revenues generated in each county to the line 15 applicable county transportation authority established pursuant line 16 to Division 12.5 (commencing with Section 131000) of the Public line 17 Utilities Code for expenditure consistent with subparagraph (A). line 18 If a county transportation authority has not been established in a line 19 county, the commission shall instead allocate the revenues to the line 20 congestion management agency for that county. line 21 (3)  Not less than 15 percent for investments that support line 22 connectivity, as follows: line 23 (A)  Eligible investments shall include highway, transit, and rail line 24 mobility projects that close gaps and relieve bottlenecks in the line 25 existing transportation network in a climate-neutral manner, line 26 resilience improvements that protect transportation infrastructure line 27 from climate-fueled natural hazards, and transportation safety line 28 improvements, including, but not limited to, grade separations. line 29 (B)  The commission shall ensure revenues generated in each line 30 county shall be invested over a ____ year period in projects and line 31 programs that benefit that county. line 32 (C)  A capital project funded pursuant to this paragraph shall line 33 be included in, or determined by the commission to be consistent line 34 with, a sustainable communities strategy adopted pursuant to line 35 Section 65080. line 36 (4)  Up to 15 percent for investments eligible under paragraph line 37 (1), (2), or (3). These funds shall be used to do any of the following: line 38 (A)  Ensure the minimum county benefit threshold described in line 39 subdivision (b) is met or exceeded. 97 SB 1031 — 31 — 64 line 1 (B)  Assist public transit agencies in preventing service cuts and line 2 increasing transit ridership, including, but not limited to, by line 3 funding implementation of the 2021 Bay Area Transit line 4 Transformation Action Plan and any successor plan adopted by line 5 the commission. line 6 (C)  Invest in other regional priorities. line 7 (d)  Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the commission may retain, line 8 for its cost in administering this chapter, an amount not to exceed line 9 1 percent of the revenues available after paying the administrative line 10 costs associated with the collection of the revenues incurred by line 11 state agencies or local jurisdictions. line 12 (e)  (1)  (A)  In order to be eligible for funding pursuant to this line 13 section, a public transit agency shall verify to the commission that line 14 it will maintain its expected level of funding for operations and line 15 shall not supplant any sources of operating revenue under its line 16 control or fund sources allocated by the commission that were line 17 used for transit operations in the preceding three fiscal years. line 18 (B)  The expected level of funding for purposes of this line 19 subparagraph, which shall be referred to as the maintenance of line 20 effort, shall be calculated using the public transit agency’s average line 21 discretionary operating expenditures for the preceding three fiscal line 22 years, two years in arrears as reported to the Controller in its line 23 annual report submitted pursuant to Section 99243 of the Public line 24 Utilities Code. line 25 (2)  Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a transit agency may reduce line 26 the amount of funding contributed towards its operating budget line 27 in proportion to any reduction in operating costs or reduction in line 28 operating revenue based on factors outside the control of the transit line 29 agency, including, but not limited to, the expiration of a line 30 voter-approved revenue source or the determination based on a line 31 statistically valid poll that an expiring ballot measure lacks line 32 sufficient support to warrant placement on the ballot. line 33 (3)  A transit agency may request that the commission grant an line 34 exception to the requirements of this subdivision for the purpose line 35 of transferring operating funds to state of good repair needs for line 36 assets owned and operated by the transit agency or to cover the line 37 cost of compliance with a state or federal law or regulation. line 38 (f)  In addition to the requirement set forth in subdivision (e), in line 39 order to be eligible for an allocation of funds approved by the line 40 voters pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 66538.30), 97 — 32 — SB 1031 65 line 1 a public transit agency shall be in compliance with the line 2 commission’s rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Section line 3 66516. line 4 line 5 Chapter 5. Bonds line 6 line 7 66538.50. The commission may incur indebtedness and issue line 8 bonds and other securities as follows: line 9 (a)  The commission may incur indebtedness and issue securities line 10 of any kind or class, and may renew the same, if that indebtedness, line 11 howsoever evidenced, is payable solely from revenues of the line 12 commission as specified in the indenture, trust agreement, note, line 13 bond, lease, loan agreement, or other agreement or evidence of line 14 indebtedness relating to those securities. line 15 (b)  (1)  The commission may from time to time issue its line 16 negotiable bonds, notes, warrants, debentures, or other securities, line 17 hereinafter collectively called “bonds” for purposes of this section, line 18 for any purpose specified in this division. line 19 (2)  In anticipation of the sale of the bonds as authorized by this line 20 chapter, the commission may issue negotiable bond anticipation line 21 notes and may renew the same from time to time. These bond line 22 anticipation notes may be paid from the proceeds of sale of the line 23 bonds of the commission in anticipation of which they were issued. line 24 Bonds, notes, and other agreements relating to those bonds or line 25 notes, hereinafter collectively called “bond anticipation notes” for line 26 purposes of this section, and the resolution or resolutions line 27 authorizing the same may contain any provisions, conditions, or line 28 limitations that a bond, agreement relating to that bond, or bond line 29 resolution of the commission may contain, except that the bond line 30 anticipation note shall mature at a time not exceeding three years line 31 from the date of issue or any renewal. line 32 (c)  At any time that the commission desires to issue bonds or line 33 bond anticipation notes, it shall adopt a resolution by two-thirds line 34 vote of all members of the commission specifying all of the line 35 following: line 36 (1)  The purposes for which the bonds or bond anticipation notes line 37 are to be issued, which may include all costs and estimated costs line 38 incidental to, or connected with, the accomplishment of those line 39 purposes, including, without limitation, engineering, inspection, line 40 legal, fiscal agents, financial consultant and other fees, bond and 97 SB 1031 — 33 — 66 line 1 other reserve funds, credit or liquidity enhancement costs, working line 2 capital, bond interest estimated to accrue during any construction line 3 period and for a period not to exceed the lesser of 10 years line 4 thereafter or the maturity date of the bonds or bond anticipation line 5 notes, and expenses of all proceedings for the authorization, line 6 issuance, and sale of the bonds or bond anticipation notes. line 7 (2)  The maximum principal amount of the bonds or bond line 8 anticipation notes. line 9 (3)  The maximum term for the bonds or bond anticipation notes. line 10 (4)  The maximum rate of interest to be payable upon the bonds line 11 or bond anticipation notes. That interest rate shall not exceed the line 12 maximum rate specified in Section 53531. The rate may be either line 13 fixed or variable and shall be payable at the times and in the line 14 manner specified in the resolution. line 15 (d)  The pledge of any taxes authorized under this division to line 16 the bonds or bond anticipation notes authorized under this chapter line 17 shall have priority over the use of any of those taxes for all other line 18 purposes, except to the extent that priority is expressly restricted line 19 in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds or bond line 20 anticipation notes. line 21 (e)  The bonds or bond anticipation notes may be sold as the line 22 commission determines by resolution, and the bonds or bond line 23 anticipation notes may be sold at a price above or below par, line 24 whether by negotiated or public sale. line 25 (f)  (1)  Refunding bonds or bond anticipation notes may be line 26 issued in a principal amount sufficient to pay all, or any part, of line 27 any of the following: line 28 (A)  The principal of the outstanding bonds or bond anticipation line 29 notes. line 30 (B)  The premiums, if any, due upon call and redemption of line 31 those bonds or bond anticipation notes before maturity. line 32 (C)  All expenses of the refunding, including any costs related line 33 to credit or liquidity support, reserves, swaps, or similar line 34 agreements. line 35 (D)  Interest on the refunding bonds or bond anticipation notes line 36 from the date of sale of the refunding bonds or bond anticipation line 37 notes to the date of payment of the bonds or bond anticipation line 38 notes to be refunded out of the proceeds of the sale of the refunding line 39 bonds or bond anticipation notes or to the date upon which the line 40 bonds or bond anticipation notes to be refunded will be paid 97 — 34 — SB 1031 67 line 1 pursuant to call or agreement with the holders of the bonds or bond line 2 anticipation notes. line 3 (E)  The interest upon the bonds or bond anticipation notes to line 4 be refunded from the date of sale of the refunding bonds or bond line 5 anticipation notes to the date of payment of the bonds or bond line 6 anticipation notes to be refunded or to the date upon which the line 7 bonds or bond anticipation notes to be refunded will be paid line 8 pursuant to call or agreement with the holder of the bonds or bond line 9 anticipation notes, and all other costs incident to that refunding. line 10 (2)  The provisions of this chapter for the issuance and sale of line 11 bonds or bond anticipation notes apply to the issuance and sale of line 12 refunding bonds or refunding bond anticipation notes. line 13 (g)  (1)  Any bonds or bond anticipation notes issued pursuant line 14 to this chapter are a legal investment for all of the following: line 15 (A)  All trust funds. line 16 (B)  The funds of insurance companies, commercial and savings line 17 banks, and trust companies. line 18 (C)  State school funds. line 19 (2)  Whenever any money or funds may, by any law in existence line 20 as of January 1, 2025, or later enacted, be invested in bonds of line 21 cities, counties, school districts, or other districts within the state, line 22 those funds may be invested in the bonds issued pursuant to this line 23 chapter, and whenever bonds of cities, counties, school districts, line 24 or other districts within this state may, by any law in existence as line 25 of January 1, 2025, or later enacted, be used as security for the line 26 performance of any act or the deposit of any public money, the line 27 bonds issued pursuant to this chapter may be so used. line 28 (3)  The provisions of this division are in addition to all other line 29 laws relating to legal investments and shall be controlling as the line 30 latest expression of the Legislature with respect to laws relating line 31 to legal investments. line 32 line 33 Chapter 6. Miscellaneous line 34 line 35 66538.60. Any action or proceeding to contest, question, or line 36 deny the validity of a tax provided for in this division, the financing line 37 of the programs and projects contemplated by this division, the line 38 issuance of any bonds secured by those taxes, or any of the related line 39 proceedings, shall be commenced within 60 days from the date of line 40 the election at which the tax is approved. After that date, the 97 SB 1031 — 35 — 68 line 1 financing of the program, the issuance of the bonds, and all related line 2 proceedings, including the collection of the taxes, shall be held line 3 valid and incontestable in every respect. line 4 66538.62. The commission may in its own name to do all acts line 5 necessary or convenient for the exercise of its powers under this line 6 division and the financing of the programs, projects and purposes line 7 identified in this division, including, but not limited to, all of the line 8 following: line 9 (a)  To make and enter into contracts. line 10 (b)  To employ agents or employees. line 11 (c)  To acquire, construct, manage, maintain, lease, or operate line 12 any public facility or improvements. line 13 (d)  To sue and be sued in its own name. line 14 (e)  To apply for, accept, receive, and disburse grants, loans, and line 15 other assistance from any agency of the United States of America line 16 or of the State of California. line 17 (f)  To invest any money not required for the immediate line 18 necessities of the commission, as the commission determines is line 19 advisable. line 20 (g)  To prepare and include any necessary or helpful bond line 21 authorizations in connection with a ballot measure or other line 22 proceeding authorized under this division. line 23 (h)  To apply for letters of credit or other forms of financial line 24 guarantees in order to secure the repayment of bonds and to enter line 25 into agreements in connection with those letters of credit or line 26 financial guarantees. line 27 SEC. 8. Section 99270.5 of the Public Utilities Code is line 28 amended to read: line 29 99270.5. (a)  In determining whether there is compliance with line 30 Section 99268.1, 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, or 99268.9, line 31 as the case may be, by operators serving the area of the San line 32 Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, excluding the City and line 33 County of San Francisco, the Metropolitan Transportation line 34 Commission may make that determination for all or some of the line 35 operators as a group, if the Metropolitan Transportation line 36 Commission finds that the public transportation services of the line 37 operators grouped are coordinated. line 38 (b)  Commencing with claims for the 2025–26 fiscal year, an line 39 operator providing service within the area under the jurisdiction line 40 of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission shall not be 97 — 36 — SB 1031 69 line 1 eligible to make a claim pursuant to Section 99260 unless the line 2 operator is in compliance with the commission’s rules and line 3 regulations adopted pursuant to Section 66516 of the Government line 4 Code. line 5 SEC. 9. Section 976.9 is added to the Unemployment Insurance line 6 Code, to read: line 7 976.9. (a)  (1)  The department, if contracted with the line 8 commission, shall administer and collect the tax imposed pursuant line 9 to Section 66538.24 of the Government Code. line 10 (2)  The department shall administer and collect the tax in the line 11 manner set forth in Section 66538.24 of the Government Code. line 12 (b)  The department may use proceeds from the tax collected line 13 pursuant to Section 66538.24 of the Government Code to offset line 14 the costs of all functions incidental to the administration and line 15 operation of the contributions. line 16 (c)  After deducting all costs described in subdivision (b), the line 17 department shall distribute the net revenues to the commission for line 18 expenditure pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section line 19 66538.40) of Division 2 of Title 7.1 of the Government Code. line 20 (d)  For purposes of this section, “commission” means the line 21 Metropolitan Transportation Commission created pursuant to line 22 Section 66502 of the Government Code. line 23 SEC. 10. Section 9250.3 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: line 24 9250.3. (a)  The department, if contracted with the commission, line 25 shall collect the regional vehicle registration surcharge imposed line 26 pursuant to Section 66538.28 of the Government Code upon the line 27 registration or renewal of registration of a motor vehicle registered line 28 in the county, except those vehicles that are expressly exempted line 29 under this code from the payment of registration fees. line 30 (b)  After deducting all costs incurred pursuant to this section, line 31 the department shall distribute the net revenues to the commission line 32 for expenditure pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section line 33 66538.40) of Division 2 of Title 7.1 of the Government Code. line 34 (c)  The department shall collaborate with the commission to line 35 ensure the administration of the surcharge described in subdivision line 36 (a) can be facilitated after the modernization of the department’s line 37 technology systems. line 38 (d)  For purposes of this section, “commission” means the line 39 Metropolitan Transportation Commission created pursuant to line 40 Section 66502 of the Government Code. 97 SB 1031 — 37 — 70 line 1 SEC. 11. If the Commission on State Mandates determines line 2 that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement line 3 to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made line 4 pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division line 5 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. O 97 — 38 — SB 1031 71 SB 1031 TERM SHEET • MTC's authority to put a measure to voters expires after 2040 • Taxes may have a duration of up to 30 years • Goal of bill is to raise $1.5 billion annually from new taxes; sales tax increase limited to not more than ~ cent • Keep placeholder language for new transit pass proposal. • MTC can only bond against revenues raised by the taxes authorized by this bill and that are retained by MTC. Bonds can only be used for capital investments. • MTC, as regional network manager has authority to condition STA funds on its network management policies approved by the Commission subject to prescribed guardrails in the bill. The bill shall not change MTC authority on conditioning any other existing funds. • On the Return to Source Issue, the author is completely committed to continuing discussions with stakeholders, including stakeholders in the South Bay, on return to source and the structure of the expenditure plan framework. 72 Senate Bill 1031 – Bay Area Transportation Measure Authorization DRAFT SB 1031 Fact Sheet – Updated 04.20.24 SUMMARY SB 1031, the Connect Bay Area Act, authorizes Bay Area voters to consider a measure to fund climate- friendly transportation investments in the San Francisco Bay Area as early as 2026. The measure would be placed upon the ballot by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) or voter initiative and could include a sales tax, payroll tax, parcel tax, vehicle registration charge, or combination thereof. As of October 2023, almost two-thirds of Bay Area voters agree that there is a need for more funding to address transportation in the Bay Area and 78% believe that public transit is very important for the Bay Area. SB 1031 requires MTC to develop a balanced expenditure plan that distributes new special tax revenues across different transportation expenditure categories and ensures that each county paying into the measure receives at least 70% of revenues it contributes back in benefit. The expenditure plan requires transit transformation revenues to be distributed in a manner that prevents service cuts and guarantees a minimum funding amount per transit operator, and can also be invested in regional transit coordination initiatives directly related to operations spending. The Connect Bay Area Act also authorizes expenditures from a ballot measure to be used to fund: ● Zero emission transit vehicles and related infrastructure ● Safe streets, including pothole repairs, bicycle and pedestrian access improvements, and safe routes to transit. ● Capital improvements to support connectivity, including roadway and transit capital improvement projects that support connectivity and mobility in a climate neutral manner. ● Climate resiliency projects to protect transportation infrastructure. To meet Bay Area residents’ desire for improved and convenient public transportation, SB 1031 also promotes efforts to improve the seamless integration of Bay Area transit systems, by: 1. Strengthening regional network management efforts and transportation demand management policies 2. Directing the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) to select a transportation institute to conduct a consolidation assessment for the twenty-seven public transit agencies spanning the nine Bay Area counties BACKGROUND/EXISTING LAW Protecting Recovering Public Transit and Building a World Class Bay Area Transportation System A safe, reliable and connected Bay Area transportation network is vital to achieving California’s climate, social equity, economic and workforce goals. But existing resources alone are not enough to keep the Bay Area moving. New funds are needed to prevent major transit service cuts and job losses and to modernize and improve connectivity for Bay Area residents. Shifting travel patterns due to and after the Coronavirus pandemic have led to significantly reduced ridership, resulting in significant operating deficits. These deficits also existed before the pandemic for fare-reliant operators – as an example, BART had predicted a $285 million operating 73 SB 1031 Fact Sheet – Updated 04.22.24 shortfall over 10 years due to small ridership declines in its FY 2018-19 budget – but became existential in nature with ridership losses stemming from the pandemic.1 One-time federal, state and regional funds have temporarily averted the transit fiscal cliff, but without a major infusion of new funding several of the region’s largest transit systems will face major service cuts beginning in FY 2026-27. SB 1031 aims to prevent such cuts and provide additional funding to enhance the transit rider experience across the Bay Area, improving service throughout the system. Transit agencies are working hard to regain ridership while maintaining existing service with federal pandemic relief. While ridership continues to gradually recover to pre-pandemic levels across the Bay Area, it has not fully recovered across the region. It is uncertain when or to what extent ridership will further recover. Given the importance of maintaining and improving public transit in the Bay Area to meet crucial housing, climate, and mobility goals, legislation is needed to help avert these structural shortfalls, support reliable service, and fund ridership regrowth strategies that will support long-term financial sustainability. FY 2023-24 State Budget Provided Temporary Relief Anticipating the exhaustion of federal pandemic emergency aid for transit in the coming years, last year’s budget deal prevented proposed cuts to public transportation capital spending and provided $1.1 billion more in flexible public transportation investments than anticipated over the next four fiscal years to help support transit operations. For the Bay Area, the state budget deal secured the previously committed $800 million in Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), as well as an additional $400 million in funding for Bay Area transit operations. This funding, combined with emergency regional aid, and successfully postponed the fiscal cliff until mid-2026. Starting in the fiscal year 2026-27, though, Bay Area transit agencies collectively anticipate on the order 1 BART FY 2018-19 Budget of $600 million in operating shortfalls. According to polls conducted by MTC, Bay Area voters strongly value transit, but want to see it improved, providing a safer, cleaner and more reliable experience, with greater schedule coordination, fare integration and real time transit information. Other Transportation Priorities Bay Area voters also want to see other aspects of the transportation system improved, particularly repairing potholes, repaving roads, and improving sidewalks and bike lanes to make it easier and safer to get around. Additional needs include transit capital projects to expand the public transportation system and roadway capital projects. The region’s pavement condition index, or PCI, is 67.2 This score is close to the threshold at which pavement rapidly deteriorates, indicating a significant need for roadway state of good repair. A Balanced Expenditure Plan The Connect Bay Area Act requires MTC to develop a balanced expenditure plan that distributes new special tax revenues across different transportation expenditure categories and in a manner that ensures each county paying into the measure receives at least 70% of the revenues back in a manner that benefits the county the revenue was generated in. The act requires the Commission to distribute revenues such that no less than 45% of investments support transit transformation, no less than 25% are invested in local roadway rehabilitation or complete streets investments (safe streets), no less than 15% are invested in connectivity (transit and roadway capital) improvements, and up to 15% of investments are used to close operating gaps, improve ridership, or ensure return to source minimums for counties. The expenditure plan also ensures a minimum funding allocation per operator. Specifically, the following minimum allocations apply:  At least $25 million per year for operators serving over 5 million riders per year and/or carrying passengers more than 25 million miles per year  At least $10 million per year for public transit operators in counties where those operators provide a combined minimum of 3 million 2 MTC Pavement Conditions Index Webpage 74 SB 1031 Fact Sheet – Updated 04.22.24 trips and maximum of 5 million trips per year.  At least $5 million per year for small public transit operators in counties where those operators provide fewer than 3 million trips per year Delivering a More Coordinated Transit System with Stronger Oversight & Accountability MTC has initiated many efforts at strengthening regional transit coordination across the Bay Area’s 27 transit agencies, the most well-known being the Clipper® universal transit fare payment system. Efforts to improve the transit rider experience at the regional scale were accelerated by the Bay Area’s Blue Ribbon Transit Recovery Taskforce - comprised of a wide array of stakeholders including transit agency leaders, MTC commissioners, the business community, labor and advocates. The Taskforce produced a Transit Transformation Action Plan (TAP) that identified over two dozen initiatives to help improve the Bay Area’s transit system; the top three priorities were fare integration, regional mapping and wayfinding, and transit priority. MTC and the operators are making progress on the TAP, with a new universal access transit pass program – Clipper BayPass – now in its second pilot phase and a free and reduced transfer policy coming on line later this year with the launch of Next Generation Clipper. To ensure progress is made as quickly as possible, SB 1031 provides that MTC may condition existing and future transit funding from the measure on operators adhering to policies set by MTC to advance the TAP and attract more riders. Additionally, the fragmentation of public transportation in the Bay Area has long been a challenge for riders and regional integration. The Bay Area is served by 27 mass transit operators, and transitioning between them is not always straightforward for riders. MTC has identified a number of potential benefits to consolidating policy making power among the agencies, including more effective investment and service decisions. Engaging Employers in Solutions: Transportation Demand Management and BayPass Program Under current law MTC and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) administer the Bay Area Commuter Benefit Program which requires Bay Area employers with 50 or more employees to offer one of five options: ● Pre-tax benefit that allows employees to exclude their transit or vanpool cost from taxable income ● Employer-provided transit subsidy ● Employer-provided shuttle or van pool ● Alternative commuter benefit that is as effective in reducing single occupancy vehicle trips ● Telework policy that allows telework one or more days per week for all employees whose assignments can be performed remotely Additionally, the region’s BayPass program is designed for employers and non-profit institutions to encourage their respective employees, members, and/or those they serve to travel via public transit. Revenue Measure Authorizing Legislation Placement on the Ballot and Citizens’ Initiative In order to prevent major transit service cuts, expand transit service, and meet other transportation needs, SB 1031 authorizes MTC to place a regional transportation revenue measure on the ballot in all nine Bay Area counties or a subset thereof. The bill allows such a measure to be placed on the ballot either directly by MTC or by a qualified voter initiative. Should the voters pass the measure, SB 1031 requires MTC to establish an independent expenditure oversight committee. Revenue Mechanisms SB 1031 proposes authorizing the following revenue mechanisms for the ballot: ● Sales tax ● Regional payroll tax ● Square footage-based parcel tax ● Regional vehicle registration charge – authorized only after 2030 when the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is anticipated to have fully completed a technology modernization upgrade to its registration system. SB 1031 does not impose a rate cap on the revenue mechanisms, enabling MTC to determine this subject to polling closer to when it may place a measure on the ballot. SB 1031 authorizes MTC to bond against any revenue generated pursuant to the bill. 75 SB 1031 Fact Sheet – Updated 04.22.24 SB 1031 includes a maintenance of effort provision to ensure that regional transportation funds are additive to, and not in replacement of, local transit contributions. SB 1031 includes placeholder language indicating the intent of the legislature to clarify eligibility for various types of roadway capacity expansion projects for funds from the regional revenue measure. Consolidation Assessment SB 1031 requires CalSTA to select a transportation institute to assess consolidation of the twenty-seven agencies across the nine Bay Area counties, and center the needs of riders through the lens of:  Improving the speed, efficiency, and reliability of service.  Improving the affordability of fares.  Improving the safety and cleanliness of service.  Promoting the achievement of the state’s climate goals, including through the incorporation and diffusion of zero-emission technologies.  Incorporating other technological changes that improve rider experience and safety.  Improving accessibility of, and connections to, regional and interregional transit service.  Improving and simplifying the accountability of the transportation systems to the public and riders.  Reducing administrative costs and improving cost efficiencies within and across transit agencies. Regional Network Management and Guardrails SB 1031 designates MTC with the responsibility to adopt policies that result in the implementation of a seamless transit rider experience across the nine- county Bay Area region with the goal of increasing transit ridership. This includes the following areas: ● Fares – fare payment and integration ● Schedules ● Mapping and wayfinding ● Real-time transit information ● Other customer-facing policies SB 1031 expands on current law’s statutory precedent which allows MTC to condition the receipt of State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) on transit coordination policies, expanding its authority to condition Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and future regional transportation revenue measure funds. SB 1031 prohibits MTC from doing any of the following:  Restricting a public transit agency’s access to funds that MTC does not allocate  Requiring a public transit agency to implement policies or programs that would impede or interfere with its ability to comply with legal obligations in transit labor contracts  Restricting the use of a public transit agency’s logo outside the scope of MTC’s regional mapping and wayfinding standards  Requiring that a public transit agency modify the schedule or route of a specific local route that the transit agency and MTC do not identify as primarily serving regional transit service  Subjecting a public transit agency to a policy that it determines would be unacceptable with respect to its impact on transit service, staffing, maintenance, or other specified operational or state of good repair considerations SB 1031 also includes placeholder language stating the intent of the legislature to strengthen regional network management within the region, including the possibility of establishing a body within the commission to guide regional network management efforts. Transportation Demand Management In order to strengthen the region’s BayPass program and offer additional transportation demand management tools for Bay Area employers, SB 1031 adds the purchase of a universal, unlimited transit pass for an employer’s employees as a method of compliance with the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program. Subject to voter approval, SB 1031 would expand transportation benefits for Bay Area employees by authorizing MTC and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) to require employers with 50 or more employees to provide a subsidy to incentivize non-solo driving. For employers that are located in proximity to transit, 76 SB 1031 Fact Sheet – Updated 04.22.24 the employer would be required to purchase a universal, unlimited transit pass for each of their employees. SUPPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission (Sponsor) Napa Valley Transportation Authority Seamless Bay Area San Francisco County Transportation Authority California Yimby Housing Action Coalition Sustainable Silicon Valley Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club FOR MORE INFORMATION Raayan Mohtashemi, Legislative Aide Email: raayan.mohtashemi@Sen.ca.gov Phone: (916) 651-4011 Grace Dikho, Capitol Director (Sen. Wahab) Email: grace.dikho@sen.ca.gov Phone: (916) 651-4410 MTC Regional Revenue Measure Landing Page 77 Page 1 (BY ORDER OF COUNTY) Effective 4/1/2024 County Type Jurisdiction District Name Rate Operative Date Sunset Date Alameda County Alameda County Bay Area Rapid Transit District 0.50%4/1/1970 NONE Alameda County Essential Health Care Services Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%7/1/2004 6/30/2034 Alameda County Transportation Commission Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2015 3/31/2045 Alameda County Children's Health and Child Care Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%7/1/2021 6/30/2041 Alameda County Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%7/1/2021 3/31/2031 Alameda County Transportation Commission 2022 0.50%4/1/2022 3/31/2045 Alameda City Alameda City of Alameda Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2019 NONE Albany City of Albany Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2013 NONE Emeryville City of Emeryville Police Fire Child Transactions and Use Tax 0.25%7/1/2020 NONE Hayward City of Hayward Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%10/1/2014 12/31/2034 Newark City of Newark Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2017 3/31/2042 San Leandro City of San Leandro 2015 Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2015 3/31/2045 Union City City of Union City Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2011 3/31/2034 Amador County Amador County Amador County Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2009 NONE Butte City Chico City of Chico Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2023 NONE Oroville City of Oroville Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2019 3/31/2025 Paradise Town Town of Paradise Temporary Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2015 3/31/2031 Calaveras City Angels Camp City of Angels Camp Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2019 NONE Colusa County Colusa County Colusa County Emergency Medical Ground Transport Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2023 NONE City Colusa City of Colusa Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2023 3/31/2027 Williams City of Williams Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2007 NONE Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Bay Area Rapid Transit District 0.50%4/1/1970 NONE Contra Costa Transportation Authority 0.50%4/1/1989 3/31/2034 County of Contra Costa Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2021 3/31/2041 Contra Costa City Antioch City of Antioch Increase Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2019 3/31/2039 Concord City of Concord 2021 Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2021 NONE El Cerrito City of El Cerrito Street Improvement Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%7/1/2008 NONE City of El Cerrito 2015 Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2015 3/31/2027 Hercules City of Hercules Temporary Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%10/1/2012 NONE Martinez City of Martinez Road Maintenance and Improvement Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2017 3/31/2032 City of Martinez Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2019 3/31/2034 ACTIVE DISTRICT TAX RATES WITH OPERATIVE AND SUNSET DATES STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION CDTFA-823 (S1F) REV. 9 (4-24) 78 Page 2 CDTFA-823 (S1B) REV. 9 (4-24) County Type Jurisdiction District Name Rate Operative Date Sunset Date Contra Costa City Moraga Town Town of Moraga Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2013 3/31/2033 Orinda City of Orinda Essential Services Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2021 3/31/2041 Pinole City of Pinole Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2007 NONE City of Pinole 2014 Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2015 NONE Pittsburg City of Pittsburg Preservation of Citywide Services Temporary Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%10/1/2012 6/30/2035 Pleasant Hill City of Pleasant Hill Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2017 3/31/2037 Richmond City of Richmond Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2005 NONE City of Richmond 2014 Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2015 NONE San Pablo City of San Pablo EMS Transactions and Use Tax 0.25%10/1/2014 NONE City of San Pablo 2022 Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%10/1/2022 9/30/2027 Walnut Creek City of Walnut Creek Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2023 3/31/2033 Del Norte Uninc Del Norte Unincorp County Del Norte County Unincorporated Area Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2021 NONE Del Norte City Crescent City Crescent City Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2021 NONE El Dorado City Placerville City of Placerville Public Safety Transactions and Use Tax 0.25%4/1/1999 NONE City of Placerville Special Transactions and Use Tax 0.25%4/1/2011 3/31/2041 City of Placerville Special Transactions and Use Tax for Water, Sewer, Storm Drain, and Streets Facilities 0.50%4/1/2017 3/31/2037 South Lake Tahoe City of South Lake Tahoe Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2005 NONE City of South Lake Tahoe 2021 Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2021 NONE Fresno County Fresno County Fresno County Transportation Authority 0.50%7/1/1987 6/30/2027 Fresno County Public Library Transactions and Use Tax 0.125%4/1/1999 3/31/2029 Fresno County Zoo Authority 0.10%4/1/2005 3/31/2040 Fresno City Coalinga City of Coalinga General Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2019 3/31/2029 Fowler City of Fowler Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2019 NONE Fresno City of Fresno Clean and Safe Parks Transactions and Use Tax 0.375%7/1/2021 6/30/2051 Huron City of Huron Public Safety Special Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2014 NONE Kerman City of Kerman Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2019 NONE Kingsburg City of Kingsburg Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%10/1/2018 9/30/2028 Mendota City of Mendota General Transactions and Use Tax 1.25%7/1/2023 NONE Parlier City of Parlier Transactions and Use Tax 1.00%4/1/2020 NONE Reedley City of Reedley Public Safety Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%7/1/2008 NONE City of Reedley Transactions and Use Tax 0.75%7/1/2020 NONE Sanger City of Sanger Public Safety Transactions and Use Tax 0.75%7/1/2008 6/30/2028 Selma City of Selma Public Safety Transactions and Use Tax 0.50%4/1/2008 NONE 79 April 9, 2024 The Honorable Federal Glover, Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 190 East 4th Street Pittsburg, CA 94565 Dear Chair Glover: Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire created the SB 1031 (Wiener and Wahab) informal working group working group is to solicit feedback and better understand the perspectives of key stakeholders with regards to the issues and tradeoffs posed by this important bill. As Chair of the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, the informal working group is keenly interested in the perspective of the leaders and residents of Contra Costa as we deliberate the complex and consequential issues posed by the bill. Please write to us with any feedback, position, key issues, or questions that you believe would better inform the ties. If possible, please include any insight or analysis from the point of view of your county transportation commission. The measure will likely be considered in the Senate Committee on Transportation on April 23 rd, and in the Committee on Revenue and Taxation on April 24th. I would be grateful if you could provide your insights prior to that date. A meeting with the working group is possible if schedules can be arranged. A copy of the current bill language and fact sheet are attached. Please contact Colin Grinnell in the Committee on Revenue and Taxation at colin.grinnell@sen.ca.gov or (916) 651-4119 with any questions or suggestions. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, STEVE GLAZER, Chair Senate Committee on Revenue and Taxation 80 April 3, 2024 The Honorable Scott Wiener The Honorable Aisha Wahab California State Senate California State Senate 1021 O Street, Suite 8620 1021 O Street, Suite 7330 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SUPPORT IF AMENDED position on SB 1031 – San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation improvements Dear Senators Wiener and Wahab: On March 28, 2024, the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) Board of Directors met and discussed Senate Bill (SB) 1031. The Board voted to take a Support if Amended position and looks forward to working with your offices on future amendments to bring us in full support of the bill. As you are aware, BART is utilizing federal, state, and regional funding to delay our “fiscal cliff” until the end of Fiscal Year 2026, after which we face an annual operating deficit of $300 million. BART, and a smaller subset of Bay Area transit agencies, need a long-term, sustainable source of operations funding, and are encouraged to see early provisions for a minimum of $750 million towards transit operations and service improvements within the bill. We also understand that much work is needed to refine SB 1031. BART staff have identified several areas for continued discussion with your offices, the bill sponsor, peer transit agencies, and members of the Connect Bay Area working group. In the coming weeks, BART staff will be seeking direction from the BART Board to provide amendments addressing the following issues: • Scope of consolidation assessment and implementation plan • Funding for consolidation activities • Framework for transportation demand management provisions • Enhanced regional network management structure • Conditioning of new and existing funding • Retention of transit agency board authority • Share of funding across proposed expenditure categories • Eligibility of highway projects for funding • Return-to-source provisions • Transit agency maintenance of effort language We appreciate and share in your commitment to ensuring the Bay Area has a world-class, reliable, affordable, efficient, and connected transportation network. BART looks forward to working with your offices on amendments with the goal of fully supporting this legislation in the future. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT 2150 Webster Street, P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 (510) 464-6000 2024 Bevan Dufty PRESIDENT Mark Foley VICE PRESIDENT Robert Powers GENERAL MANAGER DIRECTORS Debora Allen 1ST DISTRICT Mark Foley 2ND DISTRICT Rebecca Saltzman 3RD DISTRICT Robert Raburn, Ph.D. 4TH DISTRICT Vacant 5TH DISTRICT Elizabeth Ames 6TH DISTRICT Lateefah Simon 7TH DISTRICT Janice Li 8TH DISTRICT Bevan Dufty 9TH DISTRICT www.bart.gov 81 April 3, 2024 Page 2 If you have any questions about our position, please contact Alex Walker, Manager of Government Relations and Legislative Affairs, at alex.walker@bart.gov or 510-299- 6514.   Sincerely,        BEVAN DUFTY President cc: BART Board of Directors General Manager 82 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 San Carlos Ave. – P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650) 508-6200 April 08, 2024 The Honorable Dave Cortese Chair, Senate Transportation Committee State Capitol, Room 405 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Steve Glazer Chair, Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee State Capitol, Room 407 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: San Mateo County Transit District Letter of Concern Regarding SB 1031 Dear Chairs Cortese and Glazer: On April 3, the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) Board of Directors (Board) took an Oppose-Unless Amended position on Senate Bill 1031 (Wiener and Wahab). We appreciate the authors’ focus on the need to enable new transportation funding for the nine-county Bay Area, particularly to support public transit in the wake of shifting commute patterns following the Covid-19 pandemic. However, in its current form, SB 1031 goes well beyond revenue generation. SamTrans is San Mateo County’s mobility manager; owner and operator of the SamTrans fixed-route bus system, Redi-Wheels and RediCoast paratransit systems, and RidePlus microtransit; managing agency of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain); managing agency of the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and co-managing agency of the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority. SamTrans’ bus service carries the lowest-income riders in the Bay Area, per MTC’s Transit Passenger Survey (2014-2019). According to the onboard 2021 SamTrans’ Triennial Customer Survey, the average income of SamTrans’ riders is $46,506. When household size is accounted for, 91% of SamTrans’ riders qualify as low-income and 64% are extremely low income (earning less than two times the Federal Poverty Limit). In addition, 74% of SamTrans’ riders do not have access to a car and 19% speak little to no English. For the BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2024 MARINA FRASER, CHAIR JEFF GEE, VICE CHAIR DAVID J. CANEPA MARIE CHUANG BROOKS ESSER RICO E. MEDINA RAY MUELLER JOSH POWELL PETER RATTO APRIL CHAN GENERAL MANAGER/CEO Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 1 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 83 Page 2 of 5 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 San Carlos Ave. – P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650) 508-6200 most part, SamTrans’ passengers are not regional transit riders. Only 12% of SamTrans riders transfer to Caltrain, Muni, VTA or BART. San Mateo County is a “self-help” county, with two SamTrans sales taxes and a separate San Mateo County Transportation Authority sales tax. San Mateo County also is one of three county participants in the Caltrain sales tax. One of San Mateo County’s half-cent sales taxes will sunset in less than 10 years, and our best chance to ensure continuity of funding support would be going back to the voters to get an extension in 2028 as further discussed below. SamTrans participates in all MTC-led and operator co-led regional transit initiatives, and has been working in good faith with fellow Bay Area transit operators and MTC to establish and make good use of the new Regional Network Manager Council (RNM Council), including the effort to develop clear accountability measures for all transit operators. Below, we detail SamTrans’ significant concerns with the scope and language of SB 1031: 1.Arbitrary Directive to Consolidate SamTrans and other transit agencies have been working closely with MTC on developing mechanisms for improved transit agency coordination and resource-sharing. Based on SamTrans’ extensive experience as an operating and managing agency for multiple transit and transportation agencies and functions, SamTrans’ leaders know well the costs and benefits of regional transportation management, as well as the challenges associated with efforts to study and then change how agencies work together. We believe a study on consolidation – or even more limited regional coordination – must be well thought-out, with sufficient staff and financial resources to support its timely delivery and utility. However, SB 1031 requires a full consolidation study on an extremely tight timeframe, with no cost estimate or source of funds, and a pre-determined outcome. SamTrans maintains that any study contemplated in SB 1031 should focus on how we can better provide mobility within and throughout the region, without presuming from the start that consolidation of agencies has merit over all other options. Having said that, we would note that SB 1031 lacks any structure for implementing a potential regional consolidation, or funding sources to support consolidation implementation. We support removing the consolidation elements of SB 1031. 2.No Assurance or Plan for Fair Funding Distribution SB 1031 proposes a range of mechanisms to fund transportation in the Bay Area. No matter which option is ultimately selected, significant funding would be generated in San Mateo County with no assurance that a significant amount of funding be designated for the benefit of San Mateo County and its residents. Currently, SB 1031 assumes new revenues of $1-1.5 billion annually, with $750M set aside for transit operations, and focuses these funds on agencies with the highest number of riders and greatest impending Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 2 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 84 Page 3 of 5 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 San Carlos Ave. – P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650) 508-6200 funding needs. Based on ridership and anticipated “fiscal cliffs” in peer agencies’ financial models, we anticipate a significant majority of these funds will go to BART (which serves a very small portion of San Mateo County), SF MUNI (which connects with SamTrans) and other agencies operating entirely outside of San Mateo County. This fund distribution approach penalizes San Mateo County and similarly-situated communities. SamTrans’ constituents have taxed themselves multiple times to fund transportation. In addition, we have streamlined SamTrans service, cutting wasteful and inefficient routes, and focused on the needs of our riders requiring public transit the most, resulting in adult ridership at over 100% of pre-pandemic levels. With the help of our voter- approved funds and remarkable transit ridership recovery, SamTrans’ operating budget is balanced. That said, SamTrans will face operational cost increases with the transition to zero emission technology, which current revenues will not fully support. In addition, continued and improved public transit requires substantial capital investment. From delivering innovative service and customer-focused amenities, to transitioning to zero emission technology, to protecting our bus bases against rising sea levels, and maintaining a basic state of good repair, SamTrans’ capital needs are extraordinary, and present a funding gap of hundreds of millions of dollars. Fair geographic distribution of financial resources must be prioritized to ensure San Mateo and other counties are not taxed to fund benefits that will never come back to them. Funding distribution should be fair from the start, and also regularly reassessed as transit services and financial needs change. 3. New Election Risk As drafted, SB 1031 would grant MTC broad authority to place a tax measure on the ballot in the nine Bay Area counties, or in a subset of them, with no restrictions on the number of times it can go to the ballot, when, or if certain polling thresholds must be met first. This flexibility for MTC puts local tax measures at risk. For example, San Mateo County Transportation Authority’s current Measure A will expire at the end of 2033. The 2028 election may be the best option for seeking voter approval to continue Measure A, which could be extremely difficult to achieve if there is a regional measure on the ballot at the same time. We cannot risk $100M+ per year in local funding in favor of a regional measure that may only scarcely be available to our communities. SamTrans has asked much of the local electorate and our riders in the past and has been fortunate to earn voters’ confidence. It would be enormously detrimental for San Mateo County to lose future voter support for local transportation funding measures as a result of SB 1031. These concerns are very real in San Mateo and in other local counties and must be taken seriously. We ask that you find a way to preserve and protect our ability to self-fund, such Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 3 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 85 Page 4 of 5 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 San Carlos Ave. – P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650) 508-6200 as by allowing counties to opt out of a regional measure, by limiting the reach of a new regional measure to only those communities represented by the BART Board of Directors (assuming the bulk of regional measure revenues will be spent in that area), or by restricting MTC from going to the ballot in a county where a local transportation measure also is being sought at the same election. 4. Proposed Accountability Tools and Governance Changes for MTC Go Too Far Finally, we understand the need for accountability on the part of agencies receiving financial support through new regional sources, and for MTC to be equipped with the proper tools to provide regional oversight. However, SamTrans believes MTC’s efforts should reflect the RNM process agreed to by local agencies and allow that process to evolve. The “governance” goals outlined in SB 1031 go significantly further than what local agencies agreed to, and the bill also grants MTC expanded authority to withhold historical state transit funds if MTC direction for achieving the bills goals is not followed. For example, SB 1031 would expand MTC’s authority to withhold State Transportation Assistance (STA) and Local Transportation Funds (LTF) in response to local agency actions such as changing branding at bus stops or adjusting fare prices. STA and LTF provide essential operational funding that agencies rely on, currently in the amount of about $50 million annually for SamTrans. SamTrans believes MTC should not be given the authority to withhold existing State-generated transit operations funding, especially as there are other ways to ensure accountability, including placing restrictions on MTC discretionary funding and any new moneys coming from the Regional Transportation Measure. In addition, any expansion of MTC’s role must still ensure adequate consideration of the needs of local transit operators. We believe one option is to codify the RNM Council, which is made up of large operator and small operator representatives. This approach would guarantee that leaders who provide service, and who understand the intricacies of running transit systems of varying types and sizes, are always part of the conversation at MTC. It also would allow operators to hold each other accountable in achieving shared goals. Furthermore, with any proposed expansions of MTC’s role, there is a risk of new unfunded mandates from MTC. This would need to be mitigated through either an off-setting revenue source or off-ramps for situations when transit operators truly cannot afford to meet new requirements. In this vein, operators should maintain control over their own fares, within voluntary agreements on fare coordination. In closing, preserving and protecting SamTrans’ ability to deliver local services remain our top priority. We must stress that the concerns raised above are major issues for our agency. However, we remain committed to the RNM work that is already underway and to the continued collaboration on future amendments to SB 1031. Our Board will certainly revisit this bill as the language is modified and could change its position in the future. Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 4 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 86 Page 5 of 5 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1250 San Carlos Ave. – P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650) 508-6200 We thank you for your time and consideration of our concerns. Please do not hesitate to reach out to our Government and Community Affairs Director, Jessica Epstein, at EpsteinJ@samtrans.com for further discussion. Sincerely, Marina Fraser Chair, SamTrans Board of Directors April Chan General Manager/CEO, SamTrans Cc: San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors San Mateo County Transit District State Legislative Delegation Alfredo Pedroza, Chair, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Andrew Fremier, Executive Director, Metropolitan Transportation Commission The Honorable Scott Wiener, California State Senate The Honorable Aisha Wahab, California State Senate Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 5 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 87 From:Roland Lebrun To:MTC-ABAG Info Subject:April 12 MTC/ABAC Legislation Committee Item 3b SB 1031 Date:Thursday, April 11, 2024 4:47:56 PM *External Email* Dear MTC and ABAG Commissioners, Please consider the following preliminary comments on this draft piece of legislation: Funding measure: The only legislation required at this stage is enabling legislation designating MTC as the entity responsible for putting a Measure on the November 2026 (or later) ballot. Please note that such a ballot measure is unlikely to pass until MTC can demonstrate substantial network coordination improvements resulting from the passage on SB 1031. Equitable Return to Source The voters of the 9 Bay Area Counties have approved 3 Regional Measures (RM1, RM2 & RM3) so far with hundreds of millions of bridge toll revenues being rerouted to counties contributing little to none of these revenues. Should these entities continue to insist on “return to source” (or pull out of a potential future Tax Measure altogether), MTC should consider implementing a retroactive “return to source” by reallocating past and future toll revenues back to the ZIP codes where the tolled vehicles were registered. This “return to source” would be implemented by clawing back Federal and State revenue allocations under MTC’s jurisdiction. Network Coordination While I appreciate CalSTA’s plan to spend tens of millions of dollars on one or more studies by consultants and/or Transportation Institutes, I urge Commissioners to consider directing MTC staff to analyze how London’s TfL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_for_London) coordinates timetables and transfers between the London Underground (London’s equivalent of BART), buses (operated by 10 private bus operators), thousands of trains (operated by private companies under concession agreements) in and out of London every day as well as freeways, ferries, light rail, cable cars, taxicabs, congestion management, bicycles and walking with a $15B annual budget including a 47% farebox revenue: https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/how-we-work/our-role?intcmp=2670#on-this-page-1 https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/how-we-work/how-we-are-governed https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/how-we-work/how-we-are-funded Network Branding Please consider the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_for_London#/media/File:Transport_for_London_- _Roundels.svg Network Consolidation As can be seen from the above London example, operator consolidation would be counter- productive and should be dropped from further consideration, but the Commission should consider supporting legislation that would consolidate all CMA staffs under MTC’s umbrella while retaining existing Boards responsible for the oversight of local tax measures. This would consolidate all regional and local planning staffs under one roof and enable the transition from consultants to Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 6 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 88 public sector career engineers working on a diverse portfolio of projects across the Bay Area, including megaprojects. MTC “Guardrails” “Guardrails” designed to achieve consensus should not be cast in stone and should be left open to tightening, relaxing and/or removal through follow-up legislation. “Guardrails” mandating the status quo should not be considered by the legislature. Respectfully submitted for your consideration Roland Lebrun Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 7 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 89 RE: SB 1031 - SUPPORT IF AMENDED Dear Senator Wiener, Senator Wahab, Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 8 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 90 Cc: Bay Area Caucus, MTC Commissioners and staff, As organizations committed to environmental sustainability and equitable transportation,we strongly support a transportation revenue measure authorized by SB 1031 (Wiener, Wahab) that delivers needed funding for our region's transit system, roadway repair, safer streets and active transportation to advance climate and equity throughout the Bay Area.Significant new operating funding is required to prevent severe service cuts and enhance overall service quality. As our global climate crisis continues, we know that a thriving transit system, safer streets and active transportation networks are imperative to meet the Bay Area and California's goals for equity, climate, safety and economic prosperity. In order to advance these goals and fund needed transit and safe streets investments,we call on the legislature to prohibit new highway widening projects in measure authorizing legislation.New lanes saddle us with future maintenance costs, disrupt communities, undercut transit, and take us further away from our climate goals. There are many other state and federal sources for roadway improvements, but very few to sustain and expand public transit operations. Every dollar we spend on new highways is one less dollar for public transit and safer streets.At present, there is a $24 billion shortfall 1 in state of good repair and complete streets funding for the region’s roads, where traffic fatalities have increased almost 50% in the past decade.2 There is also a large and urgent need for transit operations funding in the Bay Area. Upwards of $750 million is needed annually simply to maintain existing service levels for transit in the Bay Area, and much more is needed to increase pre-pandemic levels of service and support investments in customer-focused initiatives to advance safety, cleanliness and connectivity. We urge enabling legislation that targets transformative levels of transit investment. This measure represents a generational investment in our transportation system and will set a precedent for how transportation dollars are spent throughout California.Passing authorizing legislation this year that allows highway expansion jeopardizes climate, equity and economic prosperity in the Bay Area. In addition to prioritizing transit, safer streets and preventing highway widening, the legislature can help the Bay Area deliver a successful transportation revenue measure by authorizing progressive revenue sources that poll better and do not place undue burden on those least able to pay. We look forward to working with you to pass the best transportation measure possible, Sincerely, 2 MTC Vital Signs 1 Plan Bay Area Project List Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 9 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 91 Zack Deutsch-Gross Policy Director, TransForm Irene Kao Executive Director, Courage California Tarrell Kullaway Executive Director, Marin County Bicycle Coalition Carter Lavin Co-Director, Transbay Coalition Kristina Pappas President, San Francisco League of Conservation Voters Clarrissa Cabansagan Executive Director, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition Jack Kurzweil Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club Robin Pam Executive Director, Kid Safe SF Stan Jones Secretary-Treasurer, TWU Local 320 Dylan Fabris Community & Policy Manager, San Francisco Transit Riders Christopher White Interim Executive Director, San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Hana Creger Associate Director of Climate Equity, The Greenlining Institute Betsy Megas Santa Clara Community Advocates Michael Gliksohn, Treasurer Richmond Progressive Alliance Jared Sanchez, Policy Director, CalBike Tom Radulovich Senior Policy Fellow, Livable City Laura Cohen, Western Region Director Rails to Trails Conservancy Jean Tepperman Sunflower Alliance Jodie Medeiros Walk San Francisco on behalf of San Francisco Bay Area Families for Safe Streets Adriana Rizzo Californians for Electric Rail Kevin C. Shin Co-Executive Director, California Walks Leah Redwood Extinction Rebellion SFBay Jeffrey Levin Senior Director of Policy, East Bay Housing Organizations James Kuszmaul Volunteer Lead, South Bay YIMBY Aaron Burnett Director of Policy and Civic Engagement, Canal Alliance Lucky Maxwell Transportation Program Coordinator, Center for Independent Living Berkeley Sofia Rafikova Coalition for Clean Air Jordan Grimes Resilience Manager, Greenbelt Alliance Laurel Paget-Seekins Public Advocates Ian Griffiths Policy Director, Seamless Bay Area Bob Allen Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 10 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 92 Policy & Advocacy Campaign Director, Urban Habitat Justin Hu-Nguyen Co-Executive Director of Mobility Justice, Bike East Bay Jack Lucero Fleck 350 Bay Area Transportation team Matthew Baker Policy Director, Planning and Conservation League Rafa Sonnenfeld Policy Director, YIMBY Action Jamie Pew Policy Advisor, NextGen California Adina Levin Executive Director, Friends of Caltrain Christine Cordero Co-Director, Asian Pacific Environmental Network George Spies Co-Founder, Traffic Safety Rapid Response Woody Hastings Phase Out Polluting Fuels Program Manager, The Climate Center David Blake East Bay Gray Panthers, Board Member Meea Kang, Council of Infill Builders, Board Member Melissa Romero California Environmental Voters, Deputy Legislative Director Brian Hanlon CEO, California YIMBY David Lewis Executive Director, Save The Bay Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 11 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 93 April 1, 2024 Senator Dave Cortese, Chair, and Members Senate Transportation Committee State Capitol, Room 405 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: SB 1031 (Wiener, Wahab) –SUPPORT IF AMENDED Chair Cortese and Members: The Voices for Public Transportation coalition has worked since 2017 to bring a regional transit funding measure to the ballot. We celebrate the introduction of bill language that will raise a dedicated source of desperately-needed transit operating funding, with the explicit goal of “Protecting and enhancing transit service” in the Bay Area. (Sec. 1, (d)(1)) Voices for Public Transportation is a coalition of over 40 community, rider, labor and policy groups in the Bay Area. We came together in 2017 to develop a vision and principles for a regional measure for public transit in the Bay Area that puts transit workers and riders at the center. When former Sen. Jim Beall introduced spot language in SB 278 just before the COVID pandemic struck, we conducted a professional field poll which determined that Bay Area voters were significantly more supportive of a means-based income tax than of a sales tax. In June 2022, after prolonged advocacy by the Voices coalition, the nine-county Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) agreed to bring forward a bill to authorize a Bay Area ballot measure for public transit. The express purpose was to address the transit operating “fiscal cliff.” MTC also voted to pursue “bridge” operating funding in the Legislature, to carry the region over until a measure could be authorized and placed on the ballot. Last year, the Legislature responded when the Voices coalition joined with MTC and other transportation agencies to ask it to bridge that funding gap through 2026. Now we are in phase 2 of that plan – the long-term solution to the region’s transit operating crisis. SB 1031 is well-aligned with our coalition’s priorities in several important respects. At the same time, we appreciate Senator Wiener’s invitation to “perfect” the bill, and in that spirit offer several amendments that we believe are important to achieving its goals. The Voices Coalition supports the primary intent and believes the strengths of SB 1031 as introduced include the following: ● Focus on sustaining and improving transit service with operating funding, and advancement of transit transformation through customer and service improvements, with a minimum set-aside of $750 million a year. Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 12 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 94 Sen. Cortese, Chair, and Members, Sen. Transportation Committee SB 1031 (Wiener, Wahab) – SUPPORT IF AMENDED April 1, 2024 Page 2 ● Support for safe, complete streets, walking and biking, roadway state of good repair, and climate resilience. ● Inclusion of some progressive revenue mechanisms such as payroll tax, parcel tax and vehicle registration surcharge. ● Authorization for MTC to bring multiple successive measures to the voters. ● Study with intent to achieve outcomes and benefits to transit riders that may result from transit agency consolidation or coordination. To ensure the bill achieves its primary purpose to fully fund transit operations and does not burden those least able to pay, the Voices Coalition recommends the following amendments to SB 1031: ● Set aside a minimum of $750 million or 70 percent of revenues, whichever is greater, in annual operating spending in the first ballot measure and protect that minimum from payment obligations on capital bonds. ● Set a goal for transit service levels that exceed and enhance pre-pandemic levels, and for improved quality of paratransit service. ● Limit roadway expenditures to state of good repair and safe and complete streets only. ● Include additional progressive revenue mechanisms, such as a means-based income tax, a corporate tax, and a per-square-foot parcel tax with a higher rate for non-residential property, and limit the use of the sales tax. Conclusion Transit service levels were inadequate before the pandemic, and face a looming fiscal cliff when federal emergency operating funds, and 2023 state budget funds, run out. It is imperative to our transportation, climate, and equity goals that a measure come before the voters in 2026. Authorizing legislation amended as proposed above will raise the operating funding needed to sustain and increase transit service levels, and frontline transit jobs. We urge your support of the bill with the inclusion of these amendments. Please feel free to contact Jeanie Ward-Waller (jeanie@fearlessadvocacy.com, 401-241-8559) or Andrés Ramos (aramos@publicadvocates.org, 916-271-0428) with any questions. Very truly yours, Richard Marcantonio & Laurel Paget-Seekins (Public Advocates), Zack Deutsch-Gross & Abibat Rahman-Davies (TransForm), Dylan Fabris & Peter Straus (San Francisco Transit Riders) Members of the Voices coalition Coordinating Committee Joint MTC ABAG Legislation Committee April 12, 2024 Page 13 of 13 Handout - Comments Received Agenda Item 3b 95 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 1/13 California HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Status actions entered today are listed in bold. File name: Master Author:Laura Friedman (D-044) Title:Transportation Planning: Regional Transportation Plans Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:03/16/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Transportation Committee Summary:Requires a metropolitan planning organization to submit an adopted sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy, if applicable, to the State Air Resources Board for review. Status:06/14/2023 To SENATE Committees on TRANSPORTATION and ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. Author:Laura Friedman (D-044) Title:Transportation: Planning: Project Selection Processes Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no 1.CA AB 6 Slow ⓘ 2.CA AB 7 Slow ⓘ ✔✔✔ ✔✔✔✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Fiscal Committee 2nd Chamber 95% 95% 96 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 2/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:09/01/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Inactive File Summary:Provides that the Secretary of Transportation, among other duties, is charged with developing and reporting to the Governor on legislative, budgetary, and administrative programs to accomplish coordinated planning and policy formulation in matters of public interest, including transportation projects. Requires the agency, the Department of Transportation, and the California Transportation Commission to incorporate specified principles into their existing program funding guidelines and processes. Status:09/11/2023 In SENATE. From third reading. To Inactive File. Author:Alex Lee (D-024) Title:Light Pollution Control Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:06/28/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Appropriations Committee Summary:Relates to the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act, which requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to adopt lighting and other building design and construction standards that increase efficiency in the use of energy. Requires, with certain exceptions, an agency to ensure that an outdoor lighting fixture that is newly installed on a structure or land that is owned, leased, or managed by the agency meets certain criteria. Status:09/01/2023 In SENATE Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: Held in committee. 3.CA AB 38 Very Fast ⓘ 4.CA AB 52 Slow ⓘ ✔✔✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Fiscal Committee 2nd Chamber 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Fiscal Committee 2nd Chamber 97 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 3/13 Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Author:Timothy S. Grayson (D-015) Title:Income Tax Credit: Sales and Use Taxes Paid Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:06/15/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Appropriations Committee Summary:Relates to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Allows a credit against those taxes to a taxpayer in an amount equal to the amount of tax reimbursement paid during the taxable year for sales tax on gross receipts that would be exempt from taxation pursuant to the sales and use tax exemption. Allows a similar tax credit against those taxes to a taxpayer in an amount equal to the amount of use tax paid during the taxable year for storage, use, or other consumption that would be exempt from taxation under that law. Status:09/01/2023 In SENATE Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. Held in committee and made a Two-year bill. Author:Tasha Boerner (D-077) Title:Vehicles: Required Stops: Bicycles Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/13/2022 Last Amend:03/09/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Transportation Committee Summary:Requires a person who is 18 years of age or older riding a bicycle upon a two-lane highway when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection with another roadway with two or fewer lanes, where stop signs are erected upon all approaches, to yield the right-of-way to any vehicles ⓘ 5.CA AB 73 Very Fast ⓘ ✔✔✔✔ ✔✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 95% 98 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 4/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More FAILED Our Forecast ▼Show More that have either stopped at or entered the intersection, or that are approaching on the intersecting highway close enough to constitute an immediate hazard, and to pedestrians, as specified. Status:07/11/2023 In SENATE Committee on TRANSPORTATION: Not heard. Author:Isaac G. Bryan (D-055) Title:Street Furniture Data: Statewide Data Platform Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/01/2023 Last Amend:04/11/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Transportation Committee Summary:Requires the Department of Transportation to develop guidelines for data sharing, documentation, public access, quality control, and promotion of open-source and accessible platforms and decision support tools related to street furniture data. Requires the Department to designate the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program Technical Advisory Council to advise on the development of the initial and subsequent guidelines, and review the reports related to those guidelines. Status:06/14/2023 To SENATE Committees on TRANSPORTATION and JUDICIARY. Author:Tasha Boerner (D-077) Title:Vehicles: Electric Bicycles Fiscal yes 6.CA AB 364 Very Fast ⓘ 7.CA AB 530 ⓘ ✔✔✔ X X X X 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 95% X 99 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 5/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Committee: Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/08/2023 Last Amend:07/13/2023 Disposition:Failed Location:ASSEMBLY Summary:Prohibits a person under a specified age from operating an electric bicycle of any class. States the intent of the Legislature to create an e-bike license program with an online written test and a State- issued photo identification for those persons without a valid driver's license, prohibit persons under a specified age from riding e-bikes, and create a stakeholders working group to work on recommendations to establish an e-bike training program and license. Status:02/01/2024 In ASSEMBLY. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution. 02/01/2024 From Committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. Author:Eduardo Garcia (D-036) Title:Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Prep Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/17/2023 Last Amend:05/26/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Summary:Enacts the Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparation, Flood Protection, Extreme Heat Mitigation, Clean Energy, and Workforce Development Bond Act of 2024, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in a specified amount to finance projects for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention, drought preparation, flood protection, extreme heat mitigation, clean energy, and workforce development programs. Status:06/14/2023 To SENATE Committees on NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER and GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE. 8.CA AB 1567 Very Fast ⓘ 9.CA AB 1778 Slow ✔✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 95% 100 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 6/13 Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Author:Damon Connolly (D-012) Title:Vehicles: Electric Bicycles Fiscal Committee:no Urgency Clause:no Introduced:01/03/2024 Last Amend:04/18/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:SENATE Summary:Authorizes a local authority within the County of Marin, or the County of Marin in unincorporated areas, to adopt an ordinance or resolution that would prohibit a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 2 electric bicycle or require a person operating a class 2 electric bicycle to wear a bicycle helmet. Requires an ordinance or resolution that is adopted for this purpose to make a violation an infraction punishable by either a certain fine or completion of a safety and training course. Status:04/29/2024 In ASSEMBLY. Read third time. Passed ASSEMBLY. *****To SENATE. (72-0) Author:Pilar Schiavo (D-040) Title:Transportation Funding: California Transportation Plan Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/05/2024 Last Amend:04/15/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:Assembly Appropriations Committee ⓘ 10.CA AB 2086 Slow ⓘ ✔✔ ✔ 1st Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 95% 101 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 7/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Summary:Provides that existing law requires the Department of Transportation to prepare the State Transportation Plan. Requires the plan to include a financial element that summarizes the full cost of plan implementation, a summary of available revenues through the planning period, and an analysis of what is feasible within the plan if constrained by a realistic projection of available revenues. Requires the department to enhance an existing public online dashboard to display specified plan information. Status:04/22/2024 From ASSEMBLY Committee on TRANSPORTATION: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. (15-0) Author:Laura Friedman (D-044) Title:Transportation: Class III Bikeways: Bicycle Facilities Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/12/2024 Last Amend:04/01/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:Assembly Appropriations Committee Summary:Prohibits the allocation of Active Transportation Program funds for a project that creates a Class III bikeway unless the project is on a street with a design speed limit of specified number of miles per hour or less or the project will reduce the design speed limit to specified number of miles per hour or less. Status:04/08/2024 From ASSEMBLY Committee on TRANSPORTATION: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. (11-4) 11.CA AB 2290 Fast ⓘ 12.CA AB 2535 Slow ⓘ ✔ ✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 102 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 8/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Author:Mia Bonta (D-018) Title:Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/13/2024 Last Amend:04/24/2024 Disposition:Pending Committee:Assembly Appropriations Committee Hearing:05/08/2024 9:30 am, 1021 O Street, Room 1100 Summary:Requires the State Transportation Commission, the Department of Housing and Community Development, and the State Air Resources Board to create guidance for the programming of projects under the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program that expand the physical footprint of a highway in a community in the highest specified percent of CalEnviroScreen communities. Requires this guidance to be incorporated into the programming cycle. Status:04/24/2024 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. Author:Marc Berman (D-023) Title:School Zones and Walk Zones Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/14/2024 Last Amend:04/08/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:Assembly Appropriations Committee Summary:Establishes a prima facie speed limit of a specified number of miles per hour in a school zone during certain hours and days a school is in operation. Authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of a specified number of miles per hour in a school zone. Status:04/24/2024 From ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. (8-0) 13.CA AB 2583 Fast ⓘ✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 103 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 9/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More NO FORECAST SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Our Forecast ▼Show More Author:Kevin McCarty (D-006) Title:Sacramento Regional Transit District Fiscal Committee:no Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/14/2024 Last Amend:04/24/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:SENATE Summary:Provides that existing law requires each transit operator that offers reduced fares to senior citizens to also offer reduced fares to disabled persons and disabled veterans at the same rate established for senior citizens. Exempts the Sacramento Regional Transit District from that requirement until the specified date. Requires the district to submit a report to the Legislature if the district reduces fares for senior citizens below the rate offered to disabled persons or disabled veterans. Status:05/02/2024 In ASSEMBLY. Read third time. Passed ASSEMBLY. *****To SENATE. (74-0) Author:Juan Alanis (R-022) Title:Water Resiliency Act of 2024 Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:03/06/2024 14.CA AB 2634 Very Fast ⓘ 15.CA ACA 2 ⓘ ✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 95% 104 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 10/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More FAILED Our Forecast Disposition:Pending Location:Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee Summary:Requires the Treasurer to annually transfer an amount equal to a specified percent of all State revenues from the General Fund to the State Water Resiliency Trust Fund. Appropriates moneys in the fund to the State Water Commission for its actual costs of specified water infrastructure projects. Requires the State Auditor to annually conduct a programmatic review and an audit of expenditures from the Trust Fund and to report those findings. Status:03/06/2024 From ASSEMBLY Committee on WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE with author's amendments. 03/06/2024 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE. Author:Thomas J. Umberg (D-034) Title:Transportation: Zero-Emission Vehicle Signage Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:12/05/2022 Last Amend:06/19/2023 Disposition:Pending Location:Assembly Appropriations Committee Summary:Requires the Department of Transportation, in coordination with the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, to develop and design light-duty zero-emission vehicle charging and fueling station signage to be placed along State highways based on charger or fueling type and vehicle compatibility, in order to increase consumer confidence in locating electric vehicle chargers and hydrogen fueling stations. Status:09/01/2023 In ASSEMBLY Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: Held in committee. 16.CA SB 30 Very Fast ⓘ 17.CA SB 397 ⓘ ✔✔✔✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Fiscal Committee 2nd Chamber 1st Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 105 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 11/13 ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Author:Aisha Wahab (D-010) Title:San Francisco Bay Area: Public Transportation Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/09/2023 Last Amend:01/03/2024 Disposition:Failed Location:SENATE Summary:Requires the Transportation Agency to develop a plan to consolidate all transit agencies that are located within the geographic jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Status:02/01/2024 In SENATE. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. Author:Scott D. Wiener (D-011) Title:Transportation: Planning: Complete Streets Facilities Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:01/23/2024 Last Amend:04/16/2024 Disposition:Pending Location:Senate Appropriations Committee Summary:Requires the Director of Transportation to adopt a transit priority policy to guide the implementation of transit priority facilities on the State highway system. Requires the department to adopt design guidance for transit priority facilities. Requires the State Highway System Management Plan to include specific quantifiable accomplishments, goals, objectives, costs, and performance measures for transit priority facilities consistent with the asset management plan and the departments most recent policy. 18.CA SB 960 Slow ⓘ X X X X ✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive X 106 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 12/13 HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More HIGH SESSION ADJOURNMENT August 30, 2024 114 Days Remaining Moving Bill Our Forecast ▼Show More Status:05/06/2024 In SENATE Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: To Suspense File. Author:Scott D. Wiener (D-011) Title:Vehicles: Safety Equipment Fiscal Committee:yes Urgency Clause:no Introduced:01/23/2024 Last Amend:04/30/2024 Disposition:Pending Committee:Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing:05/13/2024 10:00 am, 1021 O Street, Room 2200 Summary:Requires a specified percent of certain vehicles, commencing with the specified model year, to be equipped with a passive intelligent speed assistance system that would utilize a brief, one-time, visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time the speed of the vehicle is more than a specified number of miles per hour over the speed limit. Requires the system, if the system receives conflicting speed limits for the same area, to apply the higher speed limit. Status:05/06/2024 In SENATE Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: Not heard. Author:Scott D. Wiener (D-011) Title:San Francisco Bay Area: Local Revenue Measure Fiscal Committee:yes 19.CA SB 961 Slow ⓘ 20.CA SB 1031 Slow ⓘ ✔ ✔ 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 1st Committee 1st Fiscal Committee 1st Chamber 2nd Committee 2nd Chamber Executive 107 5/8/24, 9:55 AM State Net https://sn.lexisnexis.com/secure/pe/appwait_helper.cgi?wait_pid=1382&host=10.139.75.27&query_id=o6O52LfUDqG9&app=lpfs&mode=display 13/13 Urgency Clause:no Introduced:02/06/2024 Last Amend:04/16/2024 Disposition:Pending Committee:Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing:05/13/2024 10:00 am, 1021 O Street, Room 2200 Summary:Requires the Transportation Agency to select a transportation institute to conduct an assessment that analyzes the benefits and disbenefits to riders, and the administrative, financial, legal, contractual, and governance feasibility, of various forms of consolidation among transit agencies that are located in the 9-county San Francisco Bay Area. Requires the Agency to develop a report of recommendations that, among other things, identifies opportunities to consolidate 2 or more agencies. Status:04/24/2024 From SENATE Committee on REVENUE AND TAXATION: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. (6-1) 108 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1276 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:6. TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 13, 2024 Subject:Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Annual Project List for Unincorporated Contra Costa County Submitted For:Warren Lai | PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR Department:PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Referral No:1 Referral Name:Review legislative matters on Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Presenter:Jeff Valeros Contact:Jeff Valeros (925)313-2031 Referral History: A landmark transportation funding package titled the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill 1),was signed into law by Governor Brown on April 28,2017,to generate new revenue to fund California’s significant funding shortfall to maintain the State’s multimodal transportation network. Senate Bill 1 (SB1)increased several taxes and fees to raise over $5.4 billion annually in new transportation revenues.SB1 prioritizes funding towards maintenance,rehabilitation and safety improvements on State highways,local roads and bridges and to improve the State’s trade corridors,transit and active transportation facilities. SB1 funds were made available to cities and counties starting in FY 2017/2018 and comprise two components- an increase in the original gas tax revenue (Highway Users Tax Account,or HUTA)that local agencies have been receiving prior to 2017 and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) program funds. SB1 includes performance and reporting requirements of local public agencies to be eligible to receive their apportionment of RMRA funds. The information and recommendations in this report, once approved by the TWIC and subsequently the Board of Supervisors, will fulfill these requirements. Referral Update: The California State Association of Counties (CSAC)annually provides an estimate of the total gas tax revenues the County can expect to see from the transportation bill,broken down by HUTA and RMRA funding. CSAC estimates the County will receive about $46.5 million in total transportation funding for FY 2024/2025, with about $21.1 million of that amount from the RMRA program. SB1 legislation emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in the delivery of California’s transportation programs.Prior to receiving its apportionment of RMRA funds from the State Controller,theCONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™109 File #:24-1276 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:6. transportation programs.Prior to receiving its apportionment of RMRA funds from the State Controller,the County must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC)a list of projects (including maintenance activities)proposed to be funded with RMRA funds.All projects proposed to receive RMRA funding must be reviewed and approved by the County Board of Supervisors at a regular public meeting. The list of projects must include a description and location of each proposed project,a proposed schedule for the project’s completion,and the estimated useful life of the improvement (see Attachment A).The project list does not limit the flexibility of an eligible city or county to fund other projects in accordance with local needs and priorities so long as the projects are consistent with RMRA priorities as outlined in Streets and Highways Code Section 2030. Example projects and uses for RMRA funding include, but are not limited to the following: ·Road maintenance and rehabilitation ·Safety projects ·Railroad grade separations ·Complete streets components (including active transportation purposes,pedestrian and bicycle safety projects,transit facilities,and drainage and stormwater capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project) ·Traffic control devices Streets and Highways Code Paragraph 2030(b)(2)states that funds made available by the program may also be used to satisfy a match requirement to obtain state or federal funds for types of projects as stated above. The County currently expends the majority of the gas tax funds towards public roadway maintenance and rehabilitation of the 657-mile roadway network in unincorporated Contra Costa County.These funds are also used as the local funding match to leverage funds from State and Federal grant programs for capital projects that ensure a safe and convenient public travel in a variety of modes (i.e. driving, walking and bicycling). In FY 2024/2025 all RMRA funds are proposed to be used for road maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): REVIEW the recommended list of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Senate Bill (SB1) funded road projects, RECEIVE public comment and DIRECT staff to perform any changes or revisions to the recommended project list. RECOMMEND the Board of Supervisors approve the project list and DIRECT staff to proceed with submitting the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 list of projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for approval prior to the July 1, 2024, submittal deadline. Fiscal Impact (if any): If the project list is not reviewed by the TWIC, forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for approval, and submitted to the CTC by the July 1, 2024, deadline, the County will not be eligible to receive its portion of RMRA funds. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™110 Attachment A Local Streets and Roads Project List for FY 2024/2025 As required by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 – Local Streets and Roads Funding, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) General Information Name: Unincorporated Contra Costa County Point of Contact: Jeff Valeros Senior Civil Engineer Contra Costa County Public Works Department 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 313-2275 Jeff.Valeros@pw.cccounty.us Legislative Districts:  Senate – 3, 7, 9  Assembly – 11, 14, 15, 16 Jurisdiction’s Average Network PCI and date/year of measurement:  County Average PCI = 70 (as of 2022) Fiscal Year (FY): 2024/2025 Rationale for Project List Selection for FY 2024/2025 RMRA Allocation Staff has developed a recommended list of projects for the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee and the Board of Supervisors to consider submitting to the California Transportation Commission. The following criteria will be used by staff when developing the current and future project list for RMRA funds:  Eligibility criteria for RMRA funds as shown in the text of Senate Bill 1 (SB1)  Emergency storm damage projects that exceeded existing road fund revenue capacity  Maintenance and rehabilitation priorities  Roadway safety  Expiring grants where local funds are necessary to complete the funding package  Geographic equity  Multimodal benefits in accordance with the Board of Supervisor’s Complete Streets policy  Positive impact to Road Program performance metrics  Meeting customer expectations 111 2 The County currently uses the majority of the total gas tax funds received towards public roadway maintenance and repair of 657 miles of the roadway network in the unincorporated areas to ensure a safe and convenient public travel in a variety of modes: driving, walking, and bicycling. These funds are also used to improve traffic safety throughout the County by using it as the local match to leverage funds from state and federal grant programs. The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) annually provides an estimate of the total gas tax revenues the County can expect to see from the transportation bill, including the total estimated revenue from RMRA program funds. CSAC estimates the County will receive about $47.8 million in total transportation funding for FY 2023/2024 from SB1, with about $20.5 million of that amount from the RMRA program. In FY 2023/2024 it is proposed to designate all the RMRA funds for maintenance activities. The range of proposed projects in future years is expected to broaden as the amount of RMRA funds increases. PROPOSED PROJECTS (Total RMRA = $21,135,384) Proposed Project No. 1: Road Drainage Maintenance (RMRA = $2,150,000) (Countywide) Descriptions:  Ditch Cleaning (6U2303) – This routine item includes performing drainage ditch cleaning to remove debris and vegetation, which may obstruct the passage of stormwater and cause local flooding. (RMRA = $550,000)  Flush Culvert (6U2306) – This routine item includes performing work associated with the cleaning of culverts by flushing with water and removing debris to ensure proper drainage and reduce flooding. (RMRA = $500,000)  Clean Catch Basins (6U2308) – This routine item includes performing cleaning of sediment and preventing obstructions of catch basins (drainage inlets) and related pipe systems. (RMRA = $800,000)  Inspect Catch Basins (6U2316) – This routine item includes performing inspections of catch basins and associated systems. This includes a visual inspection of the drainage inlet and any clean water inserts. Follow-up video inspections may be required for deeper inlets and/or suspected structural issue concerning the inlets. (RMRA = $300,000) RMRA Priority:  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Location:  Countywide Proposed Schedule for Completion:  Anticipated construction year – FY 2024/2025 112 3 Estimated Useful Life:  15–40 years (ditch/dirt roadway to concrete V-ditch)  40 years (concrete structures) Proposed Project No. 2: Traffic Safety Devices Maintenance (RMRA = $2,120,000) (Countywide) Description:  Replace Pavement Markers (6U2405) – This routine item includes replacing pavement markers on the roadway as needed. (RMRA = $70,000)  Repair and Replace Guardrails (6U2502) – This routine item includes installing new guardrails and repairing existing guardrails. (RMRA = $150,000)  Traffic Signing (6U2504) – This routine item includes repairing, replacing, and installation of roadway signage. (RMRA = $400,000)  Traffic Striping (6U2505) – This routine item includes installing traffic striping, routine repainting of traffic striping, and replacement of pavement striping along County roadways to enhance public safety. (RMRA = $350,000)  Paint Pavement Markings (6U2506) – This routine item includes installing pavement marking paintings, routine repainting, and replacing existing pavement markings along County roadways. (RMRA = $200,000)  Inspect and Maintain Guardrails (6U2527) – This routine item includes annual/periodic inspecting and maintaining of County-maintained guardrails, which includes inspection of condition, tightening of nuts and bolts, and other adjustments to ensure that the guardrails perform as designed. (RMRA = $100,000)  Thermoplastic Pavement Markings (6U2537) – This routine item includes installing new striping and maintaining and replacing existing thermoplastic pavement markings. (RMRA = $100,000)  Signals and Flashers (6U2802) – This routine item includes repairing, installing, and replacing County-maintained signals and flashers. (RMRA = $750,000) RMRA Priority:  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Location:  Countywide Proposed Schedule for Completion:  Anticipated construction year – FY 2024/2025 113 4 Estimated Useful Life:  10 years (roadway signage)  2–4 years (roadway striping – thermoplastic) Proposed Project No. 3: Structure Maintenance (RMRA = $1,400,000) (Countywide) Description:  Bridge Repair (6U2507) – This routine item includes maintaining and repairing existing bridges to restore rails and surfaces. (RMRA = $250,000)  Repair and Replace Curbs and Sidewalks (6U2511) – This routine item includes repairing and replacing cracked, broken, or displaced sidewalk sections. (RMRA = $150,000)  Repair and Replace Culverts (6U2512) – This routine item includes repairing and replacing culvert and drainage facilities that are collapsed, rusted out, nonstandard, or damaged. Work includes inspecting the complete drainage system. (RMRA = $700,000)  Repair Minor Landslides (6U2546) – This routine item includes regrading and rebuilding existing retaining walls near County roadways after minor landslides to enhance public safety. (RMRA = $300,000) RMRA Priority:  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Location:  Countywide Proposed Schedule for Completion:  Anticipated construction year – FY 2024/2025 Estimated Useful Life:  10–15 years (bridge repairs)  40 years (concrete curbs and sidewalks)  50+ years (culverts)  10–20 years (landslide repairs) Proposed Project No. 4: Pavement Repairs and Preparation (RMRA = $1,300,000) (Countywide) Description:  Pothole Patching (6U2101) – This routine maintenance item includes performing spot pavement repairs of potholes along County roadways to eliminate surface hazards. (RMRA = $450,000) 114 5  Pavement Fabric Patching (6U2102) – This routine maintenance item includes performing pavement fabric patching along County roadways to correct minor pavement defects and prevent further cracking. An area of existing damaged asphalt will be removed and excavated to allow a fabric patch to be placed. The roadway base will be compacted and leveled to support the new fabric layer and asphalt layer. (RMRA = $200,000)  Pavement Fabric Patching (6U2102) – This routing maintenance item includes applying fabric materials and aggregate seal coverings to the roadway surface to correct minor pavement defects, prevent further cracking, and seal the pavement surface. (RMRA = $200,000) RMRA Priority:  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Location:  Countywide Proposed Schedule for Completion:  Anticipated construction year – FY 2024/2025 Estimated Useful Life:  7 years (pavement repairs) Proposed Project No. 5: Countywide Surface Treatments (RMRA = $14,165,384) (Countywide) Description:  2023 Countywide Surface Treatment (6U2112) – This multi-year project will apply an asphalt rubber cape seal, slurry seal, or microsurface to 109 lane miles of roadways in the Bay Point Pacheco, and Contra Costa Centre areas as well as a section of Kirker Pass Road. Work will also include surface preparation and pavement of striping and markings. (RMRA = $6,323,712)  2023 Countywide Pavement Digouts (6U2025) – The work to be done generally consists of pavement digouts and base failure repairs in the unincorporated Bay Point, Lafayette, Pacheco, Contra Costa Centre areas, and Kirker Pass Road. Work in the Bay Point Area (Site 1) includes mill and overlay with placement of thermoplas tic striping and markings on North Broadway. Work in the Pacheco Area (Site 2) includes mill and overlay with placement of thermoplastic striping and markings on Concord Ave. Work in the Lafayette Area (Site 5) includes mill and overlay of three cul -de-sacs; Jennifer Highlands Ct., Dana Highlands Ct., and Julie Highlands Ct. Work in all areas also includes placement of temporary paint striping, pavement failure repair, and traffic signal loop installation. Funds are needed in FY 2024/2025 to conduct the warranty walkthroughs of the project. (RMRA = $15,000) 115 6  2024 Single Chip Seal (6U2117) – This project will apply a single chip seal as a pavement preservation project to various roads in the Crockett and El Sobrante areas. Work will also include surface preparation and pavement striping and markings. (RMRA = $200,000)  2024 Double Chip Seal (6U2118) – This project will apply a double chip seal as a pavement preservation project to various roads in the Blackhawk, Crockett, and Tassajara areas. Work will also include surface preparation and pavement striping and markings. (RMRA = $2,800,000)  2024 Countywide Surface Treatment – This project will apply an asphalt rubber cape seal, slurry seal, or microsurface to various roads in the Blackhawk, Crockett, East Richmond Heights, El Sobrante, Kensington, and Rodeo areas. The work will also include preparation and pavement of striping and markings. (RMRA = $4,826,672) RMRA Priority:  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Location:  Countywide (Bay Point – 106 streets, Pacheco – 40 streets, Contra Costa Centre – 32 streets, Kirker Pass Road – 1) Proposed Schedule for Completion:  Anticipated construction year – FY 23/24 and 2024/2025 Estimated Useful Life:  7 years (pavement surface treatment) 116 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1277 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:7. TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 13, 2024 Subject:RECEIVE staff report and RECOMMEND the Board of Supervisors approve the submission of grant applications to the Active Transportation Program grant program for Cycle 7 Submitted For:Warren Lai | PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Department:PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Referral No:2 Referral Name:Review applications for Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure grants to be prepared by the Public Works and Conservation & Development Departments Presenter:Joe Smithonic Contact:Joe Smithonic (925)313-2348 Referral History: The County often seeks regional, state, and federal funding to augment local road funding, stretching local dollars to build improvements that would not be possible otherwise. The current opportunity is through the Active Transportation Program (ATP). This grant program is currently on its seventh cycle. Public Works has previously submitted ATP grant applications, several of which were awarded. Referral Update: On March 21, 2024, the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) issued a Call for Projects for Cycle 7 of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant program. In the Call for Projects, Caltrans and MTC solicit applications for projects that have an overall purpose of encouraging active modes of transportation such as walking and biking. Caltrans and MTC will evaluate applications based on the following primary criteria: (1) benefits to disadvantaged communities; (2) need; (3) safety; and (4) public participation and planning. Depending on the scope and estimated cost of the project, the following additional criteria will be considered: (5) scope and plan layout consistency and cost effectiveness; (6) context sensitive and innovation; (7) transformative projects; and (8) leveraging. Submitted grant applications are reviewed statewide first. If not awarded in the statewide component, the projects are then reviewed in the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) regional component for award. The MPO regional component for Contra Costa County comprises local public agencies within MTC’s jurisdiction. Caltrans and MTC have authorized approximately $284 million and $49 million for the statewide and regional components, respectively, of the ATP grant program. The federal cost share of ATP funding is 100% with no local match for the state component. The federal cost share of ATP funding is 88.53% for the regional component with a local match of 11.47%. The federal share for the regional component can be up to 100% for low-income communities. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™117 File #:24-1277 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:7. To better position the County for a higher chance of award, Public Works staff recommends the County provide a 20% local match, which would award additional scoring points. Typically, local match funds are derived from Road Fund revenues. However, given current funding constraints, other funding sources would need to be identified. If authorized to proceed, staff will finalize and submit the grant applications for the recommended candidate projects by the June 17, 2024 deadline. Announcements of the statewide and regional awards are expected in December 2024 and March 2025, respectively. Recommended Candidate Projects: The County intends to apply for four grants for Cycle 7 of the ATP grant program. Public Works staff recommends submitting grant applications for the following projects: (1)Appian Way Pedestrian Improvements - El Sobrante (District 1) Appian Way is a roadway arterial that serves as a primary route of travel within the El Sobrante community. The corridor comprises small businesses that serve within a largely residential community. Appian Way serves as an important travel route for residents and students. The proposed project will enhance pedestrian safety and connectivity by adding crosswalk enhancements at five uncontrolled crosswalk locations and filling in sidewalk gaps along Appian Way. The five locations that will receive crosswalk improvements along Appian Way are at the intersections of Garden Road, Santa Rita Road, Pebble Drive, Rincon Road, and Argyle Road. The crosswalk enhancements at these locations include the installation of curb extensions, rapid rectangular flashing beacons, median islands, curb ramps, and updated striping. This application is a resubmittal from last cycle. (2)San Pablo Dam Road Complete Streets - El Sobrante (District 1) This 2.3-mile-long segment of San Pablo Dam Road between Appian Way and Castro Ranch Road has been identified in the Contra Costa County Vision Zero Action Plan as a high priority area for safety improvements based on several criteria such as number of collisions, traffic and pedestrian volumes, and existing road geometrics. The proposed project primarily comprises a “road diet” to convert the existing four-lane San Pablo Dam Road to a three-lane roadway with one lane in each direction and a center two-way left-turn lane. The additional roadway width will be used to install bicycle lanes. Additional work will involve removing the existing pavement striping and markings, applying a slurry seal, traffic signal modifications, installing the new pavement striping and markings, and installing pedestrian crossing improvements. Town hall meetings have been held with the El Sobrante community, and there has been a strong support for this project. The survey identified that over 80 percent supported the proposed road diet along San Pablo Dam Road. (3)Verde Elementary Safe Routes to School - North Richmond (District 1) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™118 File #:24-1277 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:7. Market Avenue is a major thoroughfare in the underserved community of North Richmond and is a popular route to Verde Elementary School. Market Avenue was improved with Class III bicycle markings along the project limits in 2022 and curb extensions were installed at the intersection of Giaramita Street in 2024. However, the remaining pedestrian infrastructure is deficient, the vehicle lanes are wider than they needed, and the sidewalks are narrow and failing. The emphasis on vehicle travel is no longer a cultural trend and this community needs an investment in the pedestrian infrastructure to promote active mobility. As one of the most impoverished communities in the state, the proposed project will provide a pedestrian-friendly corridor to connect North Richmond residents to Verde Elementary School, transit, market, community services and places of worship to uplift this community and promote a more sustainable community and healthy lifestyles. The proposed project will reduce the vehicle travel lane widths along Market Avenue between Fred Jackson Way and 7th Street to accommodate wider sidewalks for a more comfortable walking environment and street trees to promote urban greening. Additionally curb extensions will be installed at the intersection of Verde Avenue and Giaramita Street located north of Market Avenue, which leads to Verde Elementary School. These improvements will calm speeding traffic and deter semi-trucks from using this community as a cut-through to the industrial area to the north. Pedestrian comfort will be enhanced by brightening the existing streetlights and installing new streetlights at adjacent joint utility poles. This project is a resubmittal from last grant cycle. This project was previously submitted as “Market Avenue Sidewalk Widening” but has been renamed to better reflect the connection of the project with Verde Elementary. (4)North Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Network - North Richmond (District 1) The existing conditions in North Richmond’s growing job sector offer many challenges for all people walking, biking, or rolling to their jobs. These challenges mainly take the form of wide travel lanes and gaps in pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, indicative of overall lack of connectivity for all road users. The multiple gaps in sidewalk infrastructure reach several thousand feet in total, and Class II bike facilities only exist along the minimal frontage of Sunborne Nursery on Central St and partway through Brookside Drive, which is disconnected from the rest of the bike network. Some streets, such as the eastern portion of Brookside Drive, have neither sidewalks nor bike lanes. Based on community engagement, there is concern for the lack of active transportation infrastructure discouraging people from walking or biking and creating stressful conditions for residents who currently walk or bike to their destinations because they have no other means to do so. Most residents during outreach for the project indicated that they would not feel comfortable walking or biking in this area and would not feel comfortable letting their children walk or bike in the area. In addition, the project area lacks lighting at night. The proposed project will focus on addressing the deficiencies in the local active transportation network, and install sidewalks and bike paths where missing. Over 10,000 feet of Class II bike facilities will be installed on Pittsburg Avenue, Central Street, Fred Jackson Way, and Brookside Drive. In addition, the project will install widened sidewalks, crosswalks, and lighting to improve safety for pedestrians. The North Richmond Bike Network Project will provide a multi-modal friendly transportation network that will overcome the challenges that residents face getting to and from work. The proposed improvements will not only increase roadway safety for active transportation users and minimize pedestrian and bicyclist discomfort, but also encourage a mode-shift to walking, biking, and rolling for the community’s’ local trips. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™119 File #:24-1277 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:7. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): RECEIVE staff report and RECOMMEND that the Board of Supervisors approve the submission of grant applications to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) grant program for Cycle 7. Fiscal Impact (if any): 80% State Funds, 20% Local Funds CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™120 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1278 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:8. TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 13, 2024 Subject:RECEIVE Status Report on the General Plan Update: Transportation Element Submitted For:John Kopchik - Director, Dept. of Conservation & Development Department:CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Referral No:27 Referral Name:Review/Monitor Transportation Element Development (General Plan Update) Presenter:Will Nelson, John Cunningham - DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)791-1368 Referral History: Monitoring of the Transportation Element of the General Plan is a new referral, this will be the first time this issue is taken up by the Committee. Referral Update: The Transportation Element is one of nine elements in the General Plan and includes the following subsections: 1.Safe and Sustainable Transportation 2.Coordinated Planning 3.Multimodal Roadway Network 4.Active Transportation 5.Goods Movement 6.Air Mobility The Transportation Element describes existing and proposed roadways and other means of transportation such as public transit, bikeways, pedestrian routes. Addresses possible ways to address traffic congestion. Analyzes traffic conditions and needed improvements so that existing and projected circulation needs may be adequately met. In addition to these fundamental concepts the Transportation Element should also be forward looking. Since the last General Plan was adopted in 1991 the transportation planning field has experienced significant changes ranging from minor refinements to significant disruption. Changes have been driven by climate change legislation, equity concerns, technological advances, the public’s desire to have active transportation modes supported, and the realization that congestion reduction can be an expensive and futile endeavor. The County has been at the forefront of some of these advances: •The 2008 Complete Streets General Plan Amendment predates the State’s Complete Streets legislation. •While unsuccessful, the County proposed shifting to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a traffic impact CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™121 File #:24-1278 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:8. metric during the Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s development of the 2009 Countywide Transportation Plan. This foreshadowed 2013’s SB743 which ultimately imposed VMT as the principal traffic impact metric for environmental review. This landmark bill will help to decrease greenhouse gases and congestion while increasing safety. •The County was the first jurisdiction in the County to adopt a Vision Zero Policy. This item is being brought to the Committee while we are preparing to bring the General Plan update to the Planning Commission in June and forming responses to comments received. Attached to this staff report is a letter from a coalition of environmental advocates. Staff will provide a verbal update, highlights, next steps and is seeking feedback from the Committee. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): RECEIVE Status Report on the update to the Transportation Element of the General Plan, DIRECT staff as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): None. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/13/2024Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™122 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -1 5 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Transportation is a fundamental part of our daily lives. The diversity and availability of transportation options, the conditions in which they exist, and how we ultimately choose to travel—to jobs, schools, homes, healthcare providers, stores, and leisure activities—have major implications for quality of life, public health, climate resilience, sustainability, and the environment. Contra Costa County has excellent regional access by road, passenger and freight rail, water, and air. The county includes dense urban neighborhoods served by local and express bus service, sprawling suburbs connected to the Bay Area’s larger employment centers by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and major freeways, and rural and agricultural communities served by a network of two-lane highways and roads. Multi-use trails found throughout the county serve pedestrians, cyclists, and micromobility. Reducing the need for single-occupant vehicle trips, improving travel times for transit and carpools, and providing multiple connections and options for travel between neighborhoods and destinations in Contra Costa County are key considerations for the future. Closing gaps in the multi-use trail network, improving the pedestrian realm, expanding transit access, and extending the range of efficient, safe, and easy options for getting around will enhance the quality of life for all community members. This Element focuses on providing people with a variety of high-quality transportation options, strengthening transportation connections to the rest of the Bay Area and beyond, and improving transportation within communities. The Transportation Element sets forth goals and policies describing the overall mobility program for the county and identifies the general location of existing and proposed major transportation routes, terminals, and facilities, as required by the California Government Code. The Transportation Element is divided into the following seven sections that address the needs of the Contra Costa community: • The Safe and Sustainable Transportation section includes policy guidance to improve safety for all roadway users and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other environmental harms through expanded opportunities for active transportation, public transit, and zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). • The Coordinated Planning section includes policy guidance to support the County's role in regional transportation projects that involve other agencies locally and across the Bay Area. • The Multimodal Roadway Network section defines roadway classifications and includes policy guidance to enhance mobility and connectivity for all roadway users. • The Active Transportation section defines bikeway types and includes policy guidance to expand opportunities for active transportation, which includes walking, biking, or other rolling forms of travel that support active lifestyles and health. • The Goods Movement section includes policy guidance to support rail, port, and truck facilities that bolster the economy, while reducing GHG emissions and protecting public health and safety. • The Air Mobility section includes policy guidance to provide safe and viable general and commercial aviation in the county. 123 5 -2 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element • The Transportation Element Performance Measures describe how the County will track its progress in achieving some of the major objectives expressed in this Element. This General Plan highlights policies and actions that address four major themes that serve as a framework for the Plan. For the reader’s ease, policies and actions related to these themes are identified throughout the General Plan using the following icons. The policies and actions related to each theme are also compiled in Appendix A. See Chapter 1 for more information about each theme. Community Health Environmental Justice Economic Development Sustainability Separated and protected bicycle facilities increase the usage and safety of bicycles as a mode of transport, helping to shift trips away from automobiles. SAFE AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION We all use some form of transportation to reach our daily destinations. The mode of transportation people choose is affected by convenience, cost, comfort, perceived safety, travel time, and availability of options such as transit and bikeways. Since World War II, the transportation system in Contra Costa County has been focused on the automobile. The Public Works Department spends the majority of gasoline tax revenue on road maintenance primarily to ensure safe passage for cars. However, roadways that originally were designed to move cars as efficiently as possible can be redesigned to encourage walking, biking, and micromobility by making them safer and more comfortable through the provision of sidewalks, crosswalks, protected bike lanes, lighting, and shade. In addition, there is a range of public transit available that expands transportation options, including two BART lines, Amtrak’s Capitol Corridor and San Joaquins routes, local and express buses operated by several transit agencies, and ferry service (see Figure TR-1). The County plays an active role in promoting safe and sustainable transportation. Its Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program encourages developers to devise creative and effective ways to reduce car trips and associated impacts from new development. The County also maintains the Transportation Analysis Guidelines that establish a uniform approach to preparing traffic analyses and ensuring that County decisions support State, regional, and local goals, such as reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and improving safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable users. Through these and other approaches, the County also aims to reduce air pollution and GHG emissions from the transportation sector. 124 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -3 FIGURE TR-1 PASSENGER RAIL AND FERRY SERVICES 125 5 -4 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element Despite efforts to reduce vehicle trips, cars are and will continue to be the dominant mode choice for years to come. This section promotes sustainability by supporting ZEVs. In 1990, the State initiated efforts to promote transitioning to ZEVs, and regulations have been strengthened over the years as technology has evolved to enable greater emissions reductions. The County is preparing for a future with ZEVs through the Contra Costa Electric Vehicle (EV) Readiness Blueprint, which identifies the best locations for EV charging infrastructure, provides local agencies with guidance to encourage EVs, addresses maintenance of EVs and charging infrastructure, and identifies areas where energy distribution improvements are needed to support charging infrastructure. To support safety on our roadways, the County adopted the Vision Zero Action Plan in 2022, which recognizes that fatalities and major injuries on roadways are preventable. Vision Zero is founded on the five elements of a Safe System Approach: safe road users, safe vehicles, safe speeds, safe roads, and post-crash care. The County supports programs and physical improvements aimed at getting us to zero deaths on our roadway network. To monitor progress, the Vision Zero Plan commits the County to ongoing tracking of collision data. Managing transportation safely and sustainably into the future will mean operating within available funding levels while positioning Contra Costa County to take advantage of current and future innovations. Such innovations could include alternative fuels, car sharing, micromobility, private transportation network services, autonomous vehicle technology, and other advances still to come. Through all of this, the County will need to ensure its actions and practices support its safety, equity, and sustainability goals. The Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART station provides an alternative to commuting by car. Goal TR-1 Goal TR-1 A transportation system that promotes active transportation, supports effective and equitable provision of transit services, and reduces GHGs and other environmental harm. 126 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -5 Policies TR-P1.1 In addition to any required California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, evaluate the traffic operations effects of proposed projects in accordance with the County’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines and other appropriate policy supplements and transportation plans, and best practices. When operational deficiencies are identified, the treatments to address those deficiencies should first prioritize reducing the project’s vehicular trips and collision risks, and may secondarily consider adding vehicular capacity so long as the safety and movement of active modes are not compromised. Exceptions to the level of service (LOS) operational standards presented in the Transportation Analysis Guidelines may be granted if the treatments necessary to address operational deficiencies would conflict with other priorities in this General Plan and if the project is otherwise consistent with this Plan. TR-P1.2 Prioritize expansion of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to address the significant latent demand for these active transportation modes. TR-P1.3 Ensure emerging transportation technologies and travel options, such as autonomous and ZEVs and transportation network companies, support the County’s goals for reducing emissions, adapting to climate change, improving public safety, and increasing equitable mobility. TR-P1.4 Reduce single-occupant vehicle usage, at a minimum using strategies defined in the TDM Ordinance.* TR-P1.5 Ensure new highways constructed outside the Urban Limit Line are not growth-inducing through land-use controls, access limitations, and other appropriate measures. TR-P1.6 Partner with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to better manage traffic operations on the State highway system in Contra Costa County through the application of ramp metering, construction of high- occupancy toll (HOT)/Express or other managed lanes, and other capacity-management techniques. TR-P1.7 Leverage the County’s position as a major employer to demonstrate leadership in enhancing workforce commute options. TR-P1.8 Support improvement and expansion of passenger and commuter rail service countywide, with emphasis on transformative projects such as the Hercules Intermodal Transit Center and BART extensions in the I-80 corridor toward Crockett and SR 4 corridor toward Brentwood. 127 5 -6 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element TR-P1.9 Encourage transit use by supporting expansion of first- mile/last-mile programs, including micromobility. TR-P1.10 Enhance multimodal access to all transit stops, including local routes as well as passenger and commuter rail stations and ferry terminals, prioritizing stops which serve vulnerable and mobility-impaired populations. TR-P1.11 Support transitioning all on-road vehicles, including personal vehicles and business, government, and public transit fleets, to electric power from renewable sources or other zero- emission fuels. TR-P1.12 Continue to improve ZEV (including electric bicycle) charging/fueling infrastructure within new development and public rights-of-way, incorporating new technologies whenever possible. TR-P1.13 Require designs for new parking facilities to incorporate ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure and maximize opportunities for adaptive reuse.* Actions TR-A1.1 Develop and promote mobility alternatives to single- occupancy vehicles, including but not limited to micromobility, zero-carbon rideshare strategies, and public transit. TR-A1.2 Review and update the County’s Transportation Demand Management Guidelines at least once every five years to incorporate current best practices. TR-A1.3 Update the Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines on an as-needed basis. TR-A1.4 Implement programs to encourage transit use, bicycling, walking, telecommuting, and use of alternative vehicle fuels by County employees. TR-A1.5 Conduct a survey of County offices and facilities to identify gaps in the alternative transportation network and pursue funding for projects that will fill those gaps and improve the availability of alternative transportation for County employees. 128 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -7 TR-A1.6 Partner with transit agencies and CCTA to develop “Safe Routes to Transit” guidance that could be applied in new development areas and existing neighborhoods. TR-A1.7 Partner with transit providers, cities, and CCTA to develop a countywide transit stop program that takes a holistic approach to transit stop planning and construction. Push for the program to address right-of-way adequacy (i.e., sufficient space for bus pullouts and amenities), amenities (e.g., shelters, seating), and improvements around stops to increase accessibility (e.g., curb ramps, sidewalk widening). TR-A1.8 Work with transit agencies to provide convenient ways for residents to report transit shelters and other amenities (e.g., lighting, seating) that are in disrepair. Encourage and promote reporting countywide, especially in Impacted Communities. TR-A1.9 Pursue funding and other resources to implement the Accessible Transportation Services Strategic Plan and similar plans and initiatives that expand the hours of operation, operational boundaries, convenience, and quality of accessible transit to improve mobility for seniors, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable populations. TR-A1.10 Support establishment of a Bay Area-wide transit fare equity program that includes free or means-based transit passes for qualifying residents of Impacted Communities. TR-A1.11 Coordinate with CCTA and other local and regional agencies to implement the Contra Costa Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint and related policies and apply best practices in ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure requirements. TR-A1.12 Update the County Ordinance Code as necessary to support advances in ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure, including for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. TR-A1.13 Advocate for legislation requiring micromobility and other transportation technology providers to accept responsibility for and mitigate the physical, operational, and financial impacts of their services upon local jurisdictions. See also the Health and Safety Element for policies and actions related to GHG emissions, air quality, and parking lot shading. 129 5 -8 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element Goal TR-2 Policies TR-P2.1 Pursue the priorities identified in the County’s Vision Zero and other safety programs, through prioritization of safety projects and incorporation of safety considerations into all transportation planning efforts. TR-P2.2 Minimize conflicts between vehicles and people who walk, bike, or use micromobility through careful site planning, paying particular attention to driveway locations and internal pedestrian circulation, and prioritizing safety for active modes of travel. TR-P2.3 Require installation of, or provide, energy-efficient street lighting to improve public safety and comfort in urbanized areas. Prioritize installation in Impacted Communities, particularly at parks, transit stops, alleyways, bike and pedestrian paths, trails, and other appropriate areas, consistent with community preferences. Actions TR-A2.1 Maintain a Vision Zero Working Group to regularly review collision data and evaluate the effectiveness of Vision Zero and other safety strategies. TR-A2.2 Identify and address neighborhood-specific issues and needs in Impacted Communities, prioritizing installation of sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, street lighting, street trees, bicycling infrastructure, transit stop amenities, traffic calming, and other safety and comfort improvements, especially in residential areas and near schools, libraries, and recreational facilities. Explore innovative methods to ensure these facilities are maintained. Engage school districts, neighborhood groups, and the local Safe Routes to School Program in implementing this action. TR-A2.3 Coordinate with the California Public Utilities Commission and railroads to design and implement projects that address safety concerns and conflicts from at-grade rail crossings. See the Health and Safety Element for policies and actions related to evacuation. COORDINATED PLANNING Contra Costa County is part of a regional transportation network. Residents and workers have access to a variety of transportation options for intra- county and regional travel. Goal TR-2 A transportation system that protects human life. 130 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -9 The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) serves as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the county and distributes sales tax revenue to the County, cities, and transit agencies for projects and programs like freeway improvements, local road maintenance, public transit enhancements, and Safe Routes to School. CCTA prepares and implements the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) and its associated voter-approved Expenditure Plan to guide development of the future transportation system in Contra Costa County. To distribute transportation funding equitably and appropriately, CCTA divides the county into five subregions, each administered by a Regional Transportation Planning Committee. Unincorporated Contra Costa County is spread among all five subregions: • The West County subregion is administered by the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC). • The Central County subregion is administered by the Transportation Partnership and Cooperation Committee (TRANSPAC). • The Lamorinda and Tri Valley subregions are administered by the Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT). • The East County subregion is administered by the TRANSPLAN Committee. Due to the county’s diverse physical and demographic landscape, each subregion is governed by an Action Plan tailored to address its distinct transportation needs. The Action Plans and CTP also set quantifiable Regional Transportation Objectives (RTOs) to meet goals on Routes of Regional Significance, which are shown in Figure TR-2. Over time, the County implements projects and programs in the unincorporated areas to improve the transportation network and ultimately contribute to achieving the RTOs. For the larger Bay Area region, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) coordinate transportation planning and financing and administer regional plans that promote sustainable growth, including the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, known as Plan Bay Area 2050, and guide funding and policy decisions for the region. Goal TR-3 Policies TR-P3.1 Maintain an inclusive and orderly approach to interagency, interdepartmental, and stakeholder coordination on long- range capital planning and the design of specific transportation projects, including consultation with affected community and stakeholder organizations and appropriate commissions and committees. TR-P3.2 Coordinate planning, construction, and maintenance of streets, transit infrastructure, non-motorized rights-of-way and associated facilities, the countywide bicycle network, and Pedestrian Priority Areas with neighboring jurisdictions and CCTA.* Goal TR-3 Transportation facilities and services that are planned, funded, built, and maintained in a coordinated, cooperative, and effective manner. 131 5 -10 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element FIGURE TR-2 ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 132 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -11 TR-P3.3 Partner with cities, the San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA), and other involved agencies to plan and implement ferry service that benefits unincorporated county residents. TR-P3.4 Work with project applicants and property owners to establish community facilities districts or other funding mechanisms to pay for construction, operation, and maintenance of new transportation infrastructure and programs without creating an undue financial burden on existing residents, businesses, or the County. Consider that new, innovative infrastructure may cost more to maintain than facilities installed in the past, and that the increase in ongoing maintenance costs is a potential reason to deny a development application. TR-P3.5 Pursue regional, State, and federal funding to augment locally generated funds to construct and maintain transportation infrastructure. Actions TR-A3.1 Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions, CCTA, and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to plan, design, and implement Complete Streets concepts on Routes of Regional Significance. TR-A3.2 Partner with CCTA, neighboring and regional agencies, and stakeholders to explore and implement options for transportation system funding, including assessment districts, county service areas, impact fees, tax revenue, and other funding sources. TR-A3.3 Continue updating the County’s Area of Benefit impact fee programs as a mechanism to collect fair-share contributions from new development and fund needed transportation improvements. See the Public Facilities and Services Element for policies and actions related to general infrastructure and infrastructure funding. MULTIMODAL ROADWAY NETWORK The local transportation system needs to serve all users and modes of transportation, with a focus on safety, accessibility, and convenient, efficient travel between origins and destinations in Contra Costa County. Enhancing mobility and connectivity for transit, bicycles, and pedestrians will also help reduce traffic congestion and pollution and promote public health. As interest in safe and sustainable transportation systems has grown, communities throughout California have been changing the transportation planning paradigm from a vehicle-centered exercise to a complete streets approach, in which all travel modes are accommodated in a balanced way based on the particular street’s location, land use context, and function within the circulation network. In 2016, Contra Costa County adopted its Complete Streets Policy that includes complete streets principles and implementation guidelines. The policy focuses on context-sensitive planning, 133 5 -12 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element the importance of considering user diversity (i.e., different user abilities and modes of travel), and a holistic approach that expects all involved County departments and all projects to include a complete streets focus. Roadway classifications help define the function of various street types in the transportation network, based on the level of traffic volume that can be served. Classifying roadways allows the County to monitor performance and plan for improvements needed to accommodate changes in traffic, as well as pedestrian and bicycle volumes over the life of this General Plan. Classifications are also necessary to ensure the County is eligible for roadway maintenance and improvement funding. This General Plan defines the County’s roadway network based on traditional categories recognized by regional, State, and federal transportation agencies. The roadway classifications included in the roadway network are described herein and shown on Figure TR-3. • Freeways are high-speed facilities that move inter-city or regional traffic. Freeways that provide regional access to, from, and within Contra Costa County include Interstate (I-) 80, I-680, I-580, State Route (SR) 4, SR 24, SR 242, and SR 160. • Arterials are relatively high-volume facilities that connect the regional roadway network to the local roadway network. Limited access is provided to abutting parcels in many cases. Arterial streets generally serve between 10,000 and 40,000 vehicles per day; some minor arterials serve fewer than 10,000 vehicles per day. Most intersections along arterials are signalized, often with a coordinated and interconnected signal system. Some of the primary arterials in Contra Costa County include Richmond Parkway, San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo Dam Road, Kirker Pass Road, Danville Boulevard/San Ramon Valley Boulevard, Camino Tassajara, Vasco Road, and Byron Highway. • Collectors connect residential and local-serving commercial areas with the arterial system. Collector streets serve as principal traffic arteries within residential and commercial areas. These streets typically carry up to 10,000 vehicles per day, although some collectors may carry more vehicle traffic for short segments as they convey traffic between arterial streets and local residential streets. Collectors are often important segments of bikeway networks. • Local roads provide circulation within neighborhoods and between adjacent land uses. They are typically low-speed, low-volume streets with design features that discourage through traffic to be more compatible with residential needs. San Pablo Dam Road in El Sobrante is classified as an arterial. 134 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -13 FIGURE TR-3 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS 135 5 -14 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element The roadway network in the southeastern part of the county will be significantly expanded with the planned SR 239 project, which will provide a direct connection between SR 4 and the I-580/I-205 corridor in Alameda and San Joaquin Counties. Although SR 239 has been a legislatively designated route since 1959, development of the facility didn’t begin gaining momentum until 2005, with the County receiving several federal earmarks. As of Fall 2023 the project is in design and environmental review. SR 239 is a large, multiphase project that is anticipated to take some time to build out. The Vasco Road - Byron Highway Connector, which among other things would enhance access to Byron Airport, is being planned as the first phase. The County plans for roadway improvements and maintenance through the Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program (CRIPP), which is updated every two years to identify the status, estimated cost, funding source, and schedule for roadway projects anticipated over the next seven years. Similar to the Zoning Code, the CRIPP must be consistent with the General Plan. California Government Code Section 65401 requires portions of capital improvement plans and programs such as the CRIPP to be reviewed annually for General Plan consistency. This review is conducted by the County’s Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee, a subcommittee of the Board of Supervisors. Goal TR-4 Policies TR-P4.1 Plan, design, and maintain improvement projects involving County roadways in accordance with the County’s adopted Complete Streets Policy, other applicable policies (e.g., Vision Zero and other safety initiatives), planning documents such as the County ATP and CCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, and best practices (e.g., Caltrans, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, and National Association of City Transportation Officials guidance).* TR-P4.2 Require transportation infrastructure serving new development to be designed using best practices, contemplating existing and planned land uses, roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit facilities, and connections to adjoining areas.* TR-P4.3 Create connections between neighborhoods in unincorporated areas and adjacent jurisdictions to improve multimodal access to local destinations, such as schools, parks, shopping, health services, and workplaces. TR-P4.4 Manage access points along arterial and collector roadways to minimize the number of new driveway or street- type intersections. Consolidate existing street and driveway intersections to limit conflict points as opportunities arise. Goal TR-4 A roadway network that accommodates multimodal travel options for all county residents, businesses, and visitors, regardless of age, ability, race, culture, or economic status. 136 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -15 TR-P4.5 Require installation of, or provide, wayfinding signage (accessible to persons who are vision impaired) to aid navigation where necessary or desirable. TR-P4.6 Enhance streetscapes in nonresidential areas, making them more pedestrian-friendly by reducing off-street parking and setback requirements and augmenting traffic-calming measures. TR-P4.7 Encourage walkability and safety by streamlining implementation of traffic-calming measures through the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. TR-P4.8 Minimize speeding through residential neighborhoods by implementing appropriate roadway design standard, traffic- calming, and other holistic solutions, as well as enforcement. TR-P4.9 Protect residential neighborhoods from outside or cut- through traffic by implementing appropriate design solutions aimed at keeping through traffic on arterials and collectors. TR-P4.10 Design roadway infrastructure, including traffic-calming and complete streets features, to accommodate emergency response vehicles while maintaining the safety of vulnerable road users.* Actions TR-A4.1 Update the County Standard Plans on an as-needed basis to reflect best practices in context sensitivity, complete streets, travel safety, and environmental sustainability. TR-A4.2 Ensure that the CRIPP: (a) Reflects current and best transportation planning practices. (b) Implements adopted transportation and land development policies. (c) Complies with public review requirements. (d) Presents planned transportation system improvements with an implementation schedule. TR-A4.3 Develop guidance for managing curb space in ways that are sensitive to the land use context, with considerations for freight deliveries, parking, active transportation use, users with limited mobility, transportation network companies, outdoor dining, and other curb uses that may emerge. 137 5 -16 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Active transportation modes – i.e., walking, biking, micromobility, and other rolling forms of travel – support active lifestyles, which in turn support community health. Neighborhoods with safe and convenient walking and biking connections to parks, jobs, and schools provide residents with a healthier alternative to driving. The pedestrian network generally consists of sidewalks and multiuse trails. Sidewalks are provided in many neighborhoods, especially those developed since the 1960s, and commercial areas, but there are gaps throughout the network and older neighborhoods sometimes have no sidewalks at all. The bicycle network, which is shown on Figure TR-4 and includes a range of bikeway types, is less developed countywide. These networks are inclusive of “rolling” transportation, in which people may use a wheelchair, skate, ride a scooter, or push a stroller. Geographic barriers such as waterways, railways, and freeways pose challenges to pedestrian and bicycle/rolling circulation and connectivity. Expanding the pedestrian and bicycle network will enhance opportunities for active transportation and reduce dependency on the car. In 2022 the County adopted its Active Transportation Plan (ATP), which serves as a roadmap to enhancing active transportation safety and mode share by providing a comprehensive look at the County’s active transportation needs and opportunities. The ATP outlines investments in new bicycle facilities, upgraded crossings, enhanced trail connections, and improved walkways. Adopted by CCTA in 2018, the Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (CBPP) identifies a network of “low-stress” routes that are comfortable for most pedestrians or bicyclists. Once developed, this network will allow people of all ages and abilities to connect across the county by walking or bicycling. Future bicycle connections planned by the CBPP are shown on Figure TR-4. The CBPP also identifies Pedestrian Priority Areas, shown on Figure TR-5, which are places where greater numbers of people are expected to walk and safety issues are most acute, indicating a need to prioritize investments in pedestrian improvements like walkways, curb ramps, and intersection improvements. With support from MTC, the County has also prepared two Community- Based Transportation Plans (CBTPs) in unincorporated areas near Richmond and Bay Point that intend to improve mobility options for low-income and underserved communities. The CBTPs seek to improve all types of transportation, increase access to services, improve the local quality of life, provide environmental benefits, and enhance the sense of community in the area. The Robert I. Schroder Overcrossing along the Iron Horse Trail is part of an important non- motorized regional connection between Pleasanton and Concord. . 138 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -17 FIGURE TR-4 EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE NETWORK 139 5 -18 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element FIGURE TR-5 PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY AREAS 140 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -19 Local bikeways are classified based on traditional categories recognized by regional, State, and federal transportation agencies. Each bikeway class is intended to provide bicyclists with safe and convenient riding conditions. Different bikeway designs offer various levels of separation from traffic based on traffic volume, speed, and other factors. There are four bikeway types: • Class I bikeways (bike paths) provide completely separate facilities from automobiles and are designated for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with minimal cross-flow automobile traffic. In Contra Costa County, these types of paths are often along creeks, canals, and former rail lines. Class I bikeways are often used for recreational and commute trips. • Class II bikeways (bike lanes) provide designated street space for bicyclists, typically adjacent to the outer vehicle travel lanes. Bike lanes include special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bike lanes may be enhanced with painted buffers between vehicle lanes and parking, and green paint along the bike lane or at conflict zones (such as driveways or intersections). • Class III bikeways (bike routes) provide enhanced conditions for bicyclists through signage, striping, and traffic-calming treatments, and provide continuity to a bikeway network. Bike routes are typically designated along gaps between bike paths or bike lanes, or along low- volume, low-speed streets. Bicycle boulevards provide further enhancements to bike routes by encouraging slow speeds and discouraging non-local vehicle traffic, often through use of traffic- calming features. Bicycle boulevards can also feature special wayfinding signage to nearby destinations or other bikeways. • Class IV bikeways (separated or protected bikeways), also referred to as cycle tracks, are bikeways for the exclusive use of bicycles, which are physically separated from vehicle traffic with a vertical element. Types of separation may include grade separation, plastic delineator posts, concrete dividers, or on-street parking. Pedestrian infrastructure such as signals, sidewalks, and crosswalks enhance safety. Goal TR-5 Goal TR-5 Support people who walk, bike, roll, or use mobility devices by creating safe, equitable, connected, and comfortable facilities for all ages and abilities. 141 5 -20 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element Policies TR-P5.1 Plan, design, construct, and maintain facilities for walking, bicycling, and rolling to serve people of all ages, abilities, and income levels, including children, seniors, families, and people with limited mobility. TR-P5.2 Coordinate with Caltrans to provide safe and comfortable highway interchange crossings for people of all ages and abilities who walk, bike, or use micromobility. TR-P5.3 Prioritize construction of capital improvement projects identified in the County’s ATP. TR-P5.4 Ensure that fee programs include active transportation facilities, and require new development to contribute funds, right-of-way, and/or provide active transportation facilities themselves, where feasible.* TR-P5.5 Maintain pedestrian and active transportation facilities to the same standard as roads and other transportation infrastructure, including repair and cleanup of all bikeway types and shared-use pathways. TR-P5.6 Support use of temporary, quick-build, demonstration, and pilot pedestrian and bicycle improvements to test their effectiveness and promote active transportation strategies to the public. TR-P5.7 Encourage walking, bicycling, and micromobility as the travel modes of choice for short to medium-length trips, such as trips to schools, parks, transit stops, local shopping areas, and neighborhood services. TR-P5.8 Partner with neighboring jurisdictions, transit agencies, community members, and business organizations to plan and construct sustainable streets in business and commercial areas. Consider forming community facilities districts or business improvement districts to help fund and maintain improvements. TR-P5.9 Support micromobility options such as bike-, e-bike-, and e- scooter-share. TR-P5.10 Require generous parking for bicycles and other mobility devices at key destinations, such as shopping centers, schools, workplaces, transit stations, and multiple-family housing. 142 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -21 Actions TR-A5.1 Partner with CCTA and neighboring jurisdictions to build out the countywide bicycle and pedestrian network, prioritizing completion of the Low-Stress Countywide Bicycle Network and pedestrian safety improvement projects in the County’s Pedestrian Priority Areas, as described in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. TR-A5.2 Construct innovative bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including Class IV separated and protected bikeways, bicycle superhighways, and other low-stress facility types, as described in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and in contemporary, best-practice transportation planning and engineering guidance. Use contextually appropriate green infrastructure and landscaping to separate vehicular lanes from bicycle and pedestrian facilities whenever feasible. TR-A5.3 Periodically review the scoring formula for active transportation projects to ensure continued prioritization of projects in Impacted Communities. TR-A5.4 Partner with the cities, EBRPD, and CCTA to develop uniform guidance to manage active micromobility services. TR-A5.5 Consider allowing temporary and permanent re-orientation of public space towards increased outdoor activity, including walking, bicycling, rolling, dining, and other social uses. GOODS MOVEMENT Industry and commercial enterprises in Contra Costa County are served by a goods movement system that includes rail, port, truck, and air facilities. As shown on Figure TR-6, all freeways in the county are designated as State truck routes. I-80 and I-680 are the principal north-south corridors and connect to neighboring industrial hubs, while SR 4 is the principal east-west transportation corridor serving the industrial areas of the 55-mile Northern Waterfront. Two major transcontinental railroads, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), follow the county’s western and northern shorelines, connecting the Northern Waterfront to the rest of the county, and serving ports and major rail facilities in Oakland and Richmond. The Port of Richmond, within the Richmond city limits, is a deep-water port that connects the county to markets regionally and farther afield. Deep- water shipping channels along the Northern Waterfront connect to the Ports of Sacramento and Stockton. Finally, Buchanan Field Airport in Concord is capable of handling small cargo aircraft. While goods movement is an essential component of daily life and the economy, it can cause severe health and quality of life impacts for residents who are exposed to air pollution, noise, and the potential for accidents from from nearby trains, ships, trucks, and planes. In Contra Costa County, heavy- duty truck emissions at industrial facilities and on local roads and freeways is a significant contributor to health disparities, especially in Impacted 143 5 -22 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element FIGURE TR-6 GOODS MOVEMENT FACILITIES 144 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -23 Communities. Given these and other concerns, goods movement is heavily regulated by by federal and State agencies, including the California Air Resources Board, which restricts idling times for heavy-duty trucks to minimize localized air pollution. Contra Costa County is part of the global shipping economy through various local ports, marine terminals, and railroads. Goal TR-6 Policies TR-P6.1 Partner with neighboring jurisdictions, CCTA, and the MTC to manage regional movement of goods through unincorporated areas, minimizing impacts on residents and other sensitive receptors. TR-P6.2 Support roadway improvements that facilitate regional goods movement, such as construction of SR 239 and the Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector near Byron, and replacement of the Old River Bridge near Discovery Bay. TR-P6.3 Work with ABAG/MTC to improve resilience, speed, and reliability of goods movement through expansion of smaller ports-of-entry which will increase redundancy, thereby limiting exposure to disruptive events at larger congested ports. TR-P6.4 Use all available policy tools to ensure that trucks use designated truck routes. TR-P6.5 Work with railroads to preserve non-operational contiguous railroad rights-of-way, and highly encourage construction of grade-separated railroad crossings along active lines to support current and future rail operations and ensure the long-term viability of these rail corridors. When no longer in Goal TR-6 Safe and efficient movement of goods consistent with the County's goals to reduce emissions, protect public safety, and support economic development, local access, and circulation. 145 5 -24 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element operation, maintain options for future use of the corridors for trails or other public purposes. TR-P6.6 Support development of short-line railroad infrastructure and operations in industrial areas to facilitate rail access to Class I railroad lines, attract potential businesses seeking rail-served properties, ease traffic congestion caused by goods movement on regional highways, and reduce GHG emissions. TR-P6.7 Support deepening and ongoing maintenance of the deep- water ship channels between San Francisco Bay and Stockton and continued deep-water access to the county’s Northern Waterfront. TR-P6.8 Support continued operation, maintenance, and further development of ports and terminals consistent with federal, State, and County environmental policies and economic priorities. Actions TR-A6.1 Develop a program to establish and maintain truck routes, with the goal of minimizing impacts on residents and other sensitive receptors. This program will provide engineering and policy solutions to divert trucks from Impacted Communities and establish criteria for designating weight limits on certain routes and installing physical barriers and signage. TR-A6.2 Facilitate enforcement of idling restrictions by promoting community-based reporting to enforcement agencies. TR-A6.3 Amend County Ordinance Code Title 9 – Subdivisions to require new multiple-family residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments to designate areas adequate for package and goods deliveries and passenger loading and unloading. TR-A6.4 Develop regulations responding to technological advancements in freight movement, such as autonomous vehicles, robotics, and drone deliveries, while supporting the County’s goals for reducing emissions, adapting to climate change, improving public safety, and increasing equitable mobility. See the Health and Safety Element for policies and actions related to protecting the transportation network, including rail, from sea-level rise. AIR MOBILITY Contra Costa County has two public County-owned airports: Buchanan Field Airport near Concord and Byron Airport, south of Byron. Buchanan Field Airport provides general aviation, recreation, emergency response, law enforcement, passenger, cargo, and charter services. The airport is surrounded by urban development, which limits its potential for expansion. Byron Airport serves general aviation functions and is a popular base for skydivers, gliders, and other recreational flight activities. Byron Airport also serves as a testing ground for new aviation technologies. 146 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -25 Airports influence surrounding land uses for up to three miles from the runways, affecting unincorporated and incorporated areas. To protect public safety and the long-term operations of the airports, the County’s Airport Land Use Commission adopted the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), which regulates the location of land uses near both airports through the designation of Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones (see Figure TR-7). Specifically, the ALUCP seeks to protect the public from adverse effects of aircraft noise, ensure people and facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents, and ensure no structures or activities adversely affect navigable airspace. Emerging technologies will influence future air mobility, including vertical takeoff and landing aircraft that can expand air mobility options for people and cargo to places that had previously lacked air access. Such aircraft can be served by vertiports that are specifically designed for this technology and take up smaller spaces than traditional airports. Buchanan Field is one of two general aviation airports in Contra Costa County. Goal TR-7 Policies TR-P7.1 Partner with other agencies to obtain funding for planning, development, improvement, operation, and maintenance of general and commercial aviation facilities. TR-P7.2 Work with the Federal Aviation Administration and aviation operators to minimize conflicts with residential areas and other sensitive receptors. TR-P7.3 Regulate the location of private airfields and heliports to protect public safety and minimize impacts on nearby residents and sensitive receptors.* TR-P7.4 Protect the County’s airports from encroachment by incompatible uses and minimize the public’s exposure to safety hazards and excessive noise by ensuring that all future development within each Airport Influence Area is consistent with the Contra Costa County ALUCP.* Goal TR-7 Safe and viable general and commercial aviation activities in Contra Costa County. 147 5 -26 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element FIGURE TR-7 BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT AND BYRON AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONES 148 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element 5 -27 TR-P7.5 Partner with the cities of Concord and Pleasant Hill in making land use decisions that support Buchanan Field Airport's ongoing viability while protecting public safety, consistent with the Airport Master Plan and ALUCP. TR-P7.6 Enhance Byron Airport’s viability by protecting it from incompatible urban encroachment, such as large-scale residential development, and providing infrastructure that supports existing and planned airport activities, consistent with the Airport Master Plan and ALUCP. TR-P7.7 Embrace emerging aviation-related technologies, such as drones, electric-powered aviation, and vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, to promote economic development and support the County’s goals for reducing emissions, adapting to climate change, improving public safety, and increasing equitable mobility. Actions TR-A7.1 Update the ALUCP every 5 to 10 years to maintain consistency with applicable federal and State requirements, regional plans, and this General Plan, and to achieve the County’s goals for Buchanan Field Airport and Byron Airport. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES To track progress in achieving the major goals of this Element, every five years, the County will collect data to assess its performance against the following measures. Progress will be tracked relative to the prior performance review and the baseline year of 2024. Based on the findings from the five-year review, the County may adjust policies, actions, or the approach to implementing them to improve performance, as needed. • Reduced per-capita VMT. • Reduced single-occupant vehicle mode share. • Increased bicycle and pedestrian trips. • Reduced average commute time for county residents. • Increased ZEV charging and fueling infrastructure. • Reduced number of roadway collisions involving fatalities and serious injuries. 149 5 -28 Public Review Draft Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan – Transportation Element This page intentionally left blank. 150 February 22nd,2024 To:Jody London and Adam Scarbrough,Department of Conservation and Development and Will Nelson,Principal Planner. cc:Supervisors John Gioia and Federal Glover,Sustainability Committee of the Board of Supervisors Luz Gomez,Contra Costa Sustainability Commission Chair Comments on Contra Costa County 2045 General Plan Introduction We appreciate the opportunity provided to offer suggestions and input on the Draft General Plan.Many who contributed to this letter have been engaged in the General Plan update process since it began.We commend the thoroughness and work that went into this plan,including the attention to each community profile and the themes that you’ve identified to guide the plan’s update.We also acknowledge and appreciate that the plan,through many measures,seeks to build resilience in the face of hazards amplified by global heating and environmental pollution.We also recognize the many ways in which the plan seeks to move the County forward in step with the clean energy transition and the health,social,environmental and economic benefits that this can deliver. It is our understanding that an implementation plan will be created.We feel this is an essential step in realizing changes embedded in the General Plan,and we look forward to reviewing it.It is also important that the General Plan is aligned with the CAP in terms of measurable GHG reduction targets. 151 What follows are many suggestions and comments on the plan based on the careful reading of it by many members in the groups signing on to this letter.We look forward to the opportunity to discuss key points and receive feedback from County staff on these suggestions. In Contra Costa County in 2045 (prior to Table of Contents) Point 4 of the Vision Statement Strike “growing”from the 4th point,so that it reads:“All communities benefit equitably from an environmentally sustainable and just economy,”rather than “All communities benefit equitably from a growing economy that is sustainable and just.”The expectation of constant economic growth and its compatibility with resource-preservation is contested by proponents of a circular economy, endorsed throughout these documents.It seems misleading to propose endless economic growth in the Overview /Vision Statement. Chapter 3:Stronger Communities Element Section:Environmental Justice SC-P1.1 and SC-A1.1 (p.3-5 and 3-6) We applaud the aspirational action (SC-A1.1)to “support transition from petroleum refining and other highly polluting industries to a net-zero emission economy based on renewable and sustainable industries that provide living-wage jobs.”However,the absence of any timeline weakens this statement of intent.Given environmental justice and climate urgencies,it needs to be clearly stated that this transition will be completed by 2045. 152 Additionally,every effort should be made to ensure that any replacements for fossil fuel production and refining are truly renewable and sustainable,and that County policy keeps pace with rapidly evolving scientific understanding. In regard to the above,the County,following the lead of state Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)policy,recently approved two refinery conversions to biorefining. However,that policy is currently undergoing revision in response to critical feedback from scientists,academics,and environmental justice advocates.(CARB will decide on its new policy in July.)The Union of Concerned Scientists,for example,is calling for a cap on vegetable oil-based fuels,as well as other LCFS reforms. (https://blog.ucsusa.org/jeremy-martin/a-cap-on-vegetable-oil-based-fuels-will-stabilize- and-strengthen-californias-low-carbon-fuel-standard/). Unfortunately,no guardrails were put in place around Contra Costa renewable diesel production,such as periodic reevaluation of permits.There must be mechanisms in place to ensure that projects,once permitted,can be brought into alignment with new findings about any unanticipated environmental harms or public health impacts. SC-A1.1 –A1.3 (p.3-6) Health harm is done by the refining of any liquid transportation fuel,whether plant-or petroleum-based.This study finds that “respiratory ER visit rates among residents living within 10 km of biorefineries were significantly higher”than outside the 10 km zone,and that refining corn and soy-derived feedstock was the most negatively impactful (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34232029/). The County must ensure that projects within any proposed Impacted Communities Overlay Zone “positively impact health and quality of life,”as stated in A1.3 (e).This would mean disallowing new projects with unavoidable significant environmental and health impacts,and any repurposing of existing industrial facilities with unavoidable significant environmental and health impacts,in and near the county’s Impacted Communities.Given the study cited above,“near”might be defined as a distance of at least 10 km (6 miles),although refinery pollutants are known to travel far greater distances than that. SC-P-1.2 (p.3-5) “Streamline the permitting process for new development,redevelopment,and rehabilitation that promotes community objectives in Impacted Communities,as identified in the Community Profiles.” 153 Promoting community objectives must not bypass or weaken key provisions of CEQA. The law has already been modified to expedite high-priority development (such as infill housing)and infrastructure projects.Pollution and poverty-impacted communities will likely suffer with any further weakening of CEQA protections.Perhaps this recommendation should be removed altogether. SC-P1.3 (p.3-5) Change to:Support creation of walkable districts by facilitating development of high-density,neighborhood-serving retail and service uses,public amenities,and related infrastructure (such as lighting)for residents of Impacted Communities,within walking distance of their homes. SC-A1.2 (p.3-6) “Amend County Ordinance Code Chapter 84-63,Land Use Permits for Development Projects Involving Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Materials,to:(a)Increase the hazard scores for projects with potential to adversely affect Impacted Communities to ensure more projects are subject to discretionary review….” Add:Establish a mechanism whereby community members can make recommendations to the County about updating and strengthening the existing Industrial Safety Ordinance in its entirety. SC-A1.7 (p.3-6) “Upon each 5-year review of the General Plan,review health outcomes data for Impacted Communities and assess any updated information related to the delineation of Impacted Communities in Contra Costa County.” Add:In addition,with each 5-year review,County Health Services must review health outcomes data to determine the impacts of newly permitted projects and repurposed facilities.As health data becomes available,General Plan amendments may be considered sooner than five years. 154 Section:Community Health -Healthy Neighborhoods (3-7) SCP 2.1 (p.3-11) Change:“welcome,”which is vague,and use “actively work toward”instead. This section mentions healthy air quality,but does not include any policies and actions in that regard.Perhaps this section should reference the Environmental Justice section of the Healthy Communities section,and the Transportation Element,for policies and actions to reduce air pollution.(Air quality is addressed in safety element.) Section:Community Health -Access to Health Services (3-12) Section:Healthy Homes (3-16) Suggested:This section should state a policy,and action,to replace natural gas with electric appliances to improve both home and community safety. Natural gas cooking appliances should be noted as being hazardous,due to both their toxic emissions and the explosivity of natural gas infrastructure.While SC-A6.2 outlines a program to lower the cost and encourage the adoption of energy-efficient electric appliances,this section should state a policy,and action,to replace natural gas with electric appliances to improve both home and community safety. Section:Economic Empowerment-Workforce Development SC-A-8.2 (p.3-24) “…[S]upport a just transition from a fossil-fuel reliant economy by training displaced workers with skills for living-wage jobs in new industries.” Revised language:“...for living-wage jobs in new,environmentally sustainable industries that are not ancillary to,or prolong the existence of,the fossil fuel industry.” Section:Economic Empowerment -Business and Innovation SC-A9.3 (p.3-27) 155 “Evaluate commercial and industrial regulations and permitting practices on an ongoing basis to ensure that they:(a)Address contemporary uses and activities.b)Promote compatibility between new and legacy uses.(c)Avoid creating unnecessary barriers that hinder economic expansion,investment,and sustainable growth.” Proposed language change:Strike (b).“Legacy uses”include the fossil fuel industry, which the plan actually seeks to phase out.And in (c),strike “economic expansion.” This leaves the emphasis purely on “sustainable growth.”Also,add a stipulation that regulations and permitting practices “are sufficiently protective of public health.” Section:Community Profiles BayPoint /Planned Land Use. The plan calls for creating three higher-density mixed use nodes,which is commendable.However,the plan falls short in not quantifying the residential density goals necessary for encouraging the requisite neighborhood population density that would support the creation of neighborhood-serving shops and cultural facilities,and to make public transit more practical,necessary elements of neighborhood districts that are convenient to get around in by active transportation and public transportation. Pacheco –Impacted Community “residents in Pacheco face health risks associated with poor air quality.” Add Policy and Action:To make a timely transition to use of unleaded aviation fuel. Comment -Stating that Pacheco residents face health risks associated with poor air quality totally disregards one of their real health concerns,harm from lead contamination.Their homes are being dusted repeatedly by lead tainted exhaust from aircraft using leaded aviation fuel. https://ceh.org/air-and-water/avgas-map-californians-affected-by-lead-from-aviation-fuel/ The county could stop the sale of this toxic fuel and ensure the use of an unleaded version of aviation fuel,just like Santa Clara County has done. 156 Chapter 4:Land-Use Element Section:Orderly,Well-Planned Growth -Changes to the Urban Limit Line.(p.4-14) Update the date on the statement:”The BOS will review the boundary of the ULL in the year 2016”as these provisions are effective until Dec.31,2026. LU -A1.2 (4-15) Consider a more specific word than “periodically”update Co.Ordinance Code Title 7. Section:Specific Land Uses LU-7 Add Policy:For new developments on arterial streets where the ground level street frontage will be substantially retail,service,and cultural facilities,eliminate maximum building size and dwelling unit quantity limits for multi-family housing.Instead,create zoning requirements that impose reasonable buffers between the new development and adjacent existing residential properties. LU-P9.1 (4-28) “Welcome industries that create living-wage jobs and career advancement opportunities for county residents while minimizing environmental degradation.” Add:“[while minimizing environmental degradation],safety hazards,pollution exposure, and adverse public health impacts.”Instead of “welcome,”use “actively seek out.” LU-A9.3 (4-29) “Amend the County Ordinance Code and/or procedures to streamline the permitting process for businesses and industries that provide living-wage jobs,invest in the community,hire from the local workforce,and embrace sustainability.” Add:“[and embrace environmental sustainability],while maintaining CEQA compliance.” 157 Transparency and integrity in public decision-making should not be abandoned in the pursuit of equity and environmental sustainability. Chapter 5:Transportation Element Section:Safe and Sustainable Transportation (p.5-2) The plan’s emphasis on active transportation and public transportation is to be commended. Suggested change:Include information in this paragraph indicating that as of July 1, 2020,the State,by adopting Senate Bill 743,has officially moved all jurisdictions from the LOS (Level of service)metric to the VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled)metric for assessing and analyzing traffic impacts of land use and transportation projects.This is a major change that is now adopted law.Reducing VMT is now the only way that Contra Costa County or any jurisdiction is moving into the future. https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/driving-congestion-environment/sb-743-los-v mt-transition Include in this discussion:There are multiple ways to encourage people to reduce using motor vehicles for personal transportation:(a)making it more expensive,(b)making it less convenient,(c)making alternatives more convenient,and (d)creating more higher density mixed use communities—where active transportation access to shops,offices, cultural activities,and public transit becomes more practical. Add New Goal,Policy and Actions Suggested Goal:Encourage residents to ride bicycles,including electric mobility devices,for transportation and recreation by creating a complete network of bicycle facilities on all County arterial and collector streets.        Suggested Policy:Follow the most current adopted version of the Highway Design Manual,including any Design Information Bulletins that are awaiting adoption.        Suggested Actions: Install Class II bicycle lanes on each side of every Route of Regional Importance in the entire County.An acceptable alternative would be to install a Class IV bicycle path on one side of the Route of Regional Importance.If the Class IV option is pursued,there 158 must be a traffic signal at each end of the path so that the bicyclist can easily switch from the bike lane to the bike path and vice versa. Where the Route of Regional Importance is on a freeway,the bike facilities as described above will be installed on a closely parallel arterial street. When an arterial or collector street or road receives sufficient major maintenance (resurface,overlay,slurry seal,etc.)to require the restriping of the traffic lanes,all bike lanes will be painted so that they extend all the way to the limit line of every intersection. All intersections that contain any dedicated right-turn lanes must include a dedicated bike lane between dedicated right-turn lane and dedicated through lane.Given that the space between the curb faces is limited,narrowing all lanes by the same percentage will be an acceptable compromise. Be sure that all traffic-signal sensing-loops or devices include markings indicating where the bicyclist needs to wait in order to trigger the signal.This includes dedicated left-turn lanes.Pending the street undergoing major maintenance and the inclusion of a bike lane up to the limit line,such markings will be installed in the rightmost through traffic lane. Include crosswalks in all four quadrants of every signalized intersection. Retrofit to include a pedestrian "beg"button that triggers the traffic signal on every traffic signal pole without regard to the presence or absence of painted crosswalks,pedestrian "walk"signals,or sidewalks. Install and maintain bike lanes on Pacheco Boulevard,paying particular attention to the best possible passage under the historic railroad overpass on Pacheco Boulevard." TR-P1.1 (p.5-5) Rewrite this policy.Remove any mention of exceptions to LOS.Remove any mention to LOS.LOS should no longer be used by the County for analyzing traffic impacts. Reducing VMT is now the State-wide metric required by law for assessing and analyzing traffic impacts of transportation projects;Contra Costa County is required to use VMT. TR-P1.12,(5-6) 159 Add:The county will amend its building code to require EV charging for each dwelling in new multi-family projects effective by 2025,and encourage the installation of charging at existing multi-family housing with financial incentives.It should also make project permitting easier. Regarding the transition of private ICE motor vehicles to EVs,the plan only mentions adding charging infrastructure at new developments.EVs have been mass-produced for over a dozen years now.These earlier models provide relatively inexpensive entry to driving electric vehicles;however,many of the early models do not have fast charging capability.Providing charging infrastructure at existing multi-family housing is vital for the practical charging of these earlier EVs.Also,charging at home is easier for all EV owners than having to stop at commercial charging stations,and can lower charging electricity costs.It appears that 2025 CalGreen will require EV charging capability for each new dwelling in new multi-family projects.However,this greatly expanded charging requirement will not take effect until 2026. TR-P 1.2 (p.5-5) Add to the end of this sentence:"by requiring the installation of a bicycle lane along any street where the curb is replaced." TR-P 1.4 (p.5-5) Adjust this policy to indicate that reducing VMT is the County's policy.Create an action item as needed to tell the County to adjust the Transportation Demand Management ordinance to reflect this. TR-P 1.6 (p.5-5) Adjust the language in this policy to indicate that reducing VMT is now State law.This could be done by inserting language after Contra Costa County "by reducing VMT"and before “through the application of.” TR-P 1.13 (p.5-6) Add:"Opportunities to charge electric bicycles and other types of individual electric powered transport,aka micromobility,are included in the definition of ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure." TR-A Add New Action Include an action that requires the County to rewrite and update the County's Transportation Demand Management document to reflect the reduction of VMT as the County's metric for assessing and analyzing traffic impacts of transportation projects. 160 TR-A -Add New Action Include an action that requires the County to rewrite and update the County's Transportation Analysis Guidelines to reflect the reduction of VMT as the County's metric for assessing and analyzing traffic impacts of transportation projects.Note:You may want to renumber these actions to reflect the numbering system that you are using throughout the document. TR-A 1.1 (p.5-6) Include reference to both human-powered and electric bicycles in this policy.This could be done by inserting this language after ...not limited to "analog and electric bicycles,"in front of “micro mobility,zero-carbon rideshare....” TR-A 1.5 (p.5-6) Include:"bicycle lanes"and "sidewalks"specifically in the action item.This Action Item is too vague and should include an inventory of bike lanes and sidewalks within one mile of the subject County offices and facilities and from public transit to these facilities,and the closing of any gaps as a priority. TR-A 1.7 (p.5-7) Add:"bike racks and bike lockers"in the amenities parenthetic.So it reads “amenities (e.g., shelters,seating,bike racks and bike lockers)” TR-A 1.11 (p.5-7) Include:"and electric bicycle"after ZEV...and before “...charging.” TR-A 1.12 (p.5-7) Add at the end of this item:"as well as personal EVs and electric bicycles." TR-A 1.13 (p.5-7) Rephrase this action.Asking for money from others to pay for bike lanes,sidewalks and traffic signals is a great idea and should be encouraged,but the physical impacts of micro-mobility transportation are the bike lanes and sidewalks.The operational impacts of micro-mobility transportation are the traffic signals.The construction of both of these projects is called for elsewhere in this document.This entire chapter concerns providing and dividing up space on the road and encouraging people to use more of certain portions of it and less of other portions of it. TR-P 2.3 (p.5-8) 161 Change:Specifically call out that street lights be included wherever a separate bike path crosses a public street. Note:The East Bay Regional Park District has a policy of not lighting its paths.EBRPD operates many paths along utility rights-of-way that cross public streets often. Add Action:To implement this policy. TR-A 2.3 (p.5-8) Include:"Sidewalks will be included on both sides of every at-grade railroad crossing." TR-A 2.3 (p.5-8) Include:Underpasses built in the 1920s under railroads and that are very narrow according to our current roadway design guidelines will be widened to provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Comment:Two that come to mind are the one in Franklin Canyon (at the foot of the hill from Cummings Skyway)and the one on Pacheco Boulevard (just west of Falling Star Boulevard).Note:Although divided and multi-lane,Highway 4 through Franklin Canyon is not a freeway.It is not limited access,so it does not meet the Caltrans definition of freeway.Bicycles are permitted on the eastbound segment of Highway 4 between the Sycamore Avenue and the Cummings Skyway interchanges.Bicycles are permitted on the westbound side,too. Section:Coordinated Planning (5-8) Figure TR-2 Routes of Regional Significance (p.5-10) Correct:The SR 160 Corridor on the Antioch Bridge from Wilbur Avenue and to the north is NOT freeway.Bicycles and Pedestrians are permitted. TR-A 3.1 (p.5-11) Add to action item:That complete streets concepts include bicycle lanes.Include "If the Route of Regional Significance is on a Limited Access Highway (freeway),include bike lanes on a nearby parallel arterial or collector street OR include a Class IV bicycle facility on the freeway right-of-way." Note:There are three segments of freeway,of which Bikes East Bay is aware,that permit bicycles:Highway 4 between Willow Pass Road and Port Chicago Highway; Highway 4 between Sycamore Avenue and Cummings Skyway;Highway 24 between Camino Pablo and Fish Ranch Road. TR-P 3.4 (p.5-11) 162 Add:"Protected bicycle lanes must be swept as often as any street of similar type." TR-P 3.5 (p.5-11) Add:Require secure bike parking rooms in all multi-tenant buildings that do not provide an enclosed garage for each separate housing unit.(i.e.,townhomes,apartments, condominiums)Note:This policy would better be added to the Housing Chapter,but that portion of this General Plan was covered by a separate process. TR-A 3.2 (p.5-11) Include:"designation of certain roads as toll roads"as part of this action item. Section:Multimodal Roadway Network TR-P 4.1 (p.5-14) Include:A statement that deals with conflicts between bicycle plans.Specifically, between the CCTA's adopted Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and a jurisdiction's adopted bicycle plan.When such a conflict exists (i.e.,the City's plan does not call for bicycle lanes on a certain street,but CCTA's plan does),which plan will take precedent?Suggestion:the more conservative plan should.This policy should be a separate policy and logically would follow TR-P 4.1.We could call it TR-P 4.1.1 or we could follow the numbering sequence that you are using and renumber all the following policies. TR-P 4.3 (p.5-14) Add:"Build bike lanes and sidewalks up to limits of adjacent jurisdictions even if the adjacent jurisdiction does not currently have bike lanes or sidewalks along that segment of arterial or collector street." TR-A 4.3 (p.5-15) Remove:"parking"from this action item. It is time that we acknowledge there is a limited amount of space available between the curb-faces of our public streets.Large chunks of this public property should no longer go to a single individual for private use. TR-P 4.6 (p.5-15) Suggestion:Consider inclusion of on street parking as well. 163 TR-A 4.1 (p.5-15) Add:“but at least every _years”.In addition to on an as-needed basis. Section:Active Transportation (p.5-19) “Class I bikeways (bike paths)provide completely separate facilities from automobiles and are designated for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with minimal cross-flow automobile traffic.In Contra Costa County,these types of paths are often along creeks,canals, and former rail lines.Class I bikeways are often used for recreational and commute trips.” Add:"utility corridors"so this reads “....these types of paths are often along creeks,canals, utility corridors,and former rail lines.” Suggestion:Reduce the use of Class III bicycle lanes as much as possible. Comment:Bicyclists hate Class III bike routes.The copy has a very nicely written description of what perfection would look like,but the reality is that traffic engineers routinely put "sharrows"on 40+MPH arterial streets and invite the bicyclist to strap a piece of Styrofoam on their head and go out and fight it out with motorists who are paying more attention to their cell phones than they are to their driving. TR-P 5.4 (p.5-20) Delete:“where feasible”from this policy. TR-P 5.5 (p.5-20) Add Action:for the County “to obtain and use or contract for use of specialized equipment,such as ATV blowers used by EBRPD,to meet street cleaning needs of smaller bike lanes bordered by bollards.” TR-P 5.10 (p.5-20) Include:(1)Electrical outlets for the charging of electric bikes and scooters should be included in some reasonable minimum of these parking places,and (2)bicycle lockers be provided.(3)Also,bicycle racks must be sufficiently widely spaced so that cargo bikes and bicycle cargo trailers (in addition to racing bicycles)can fit between the racks; and some of the lockers should be sufficiently large to fit cargo bicycles. TR-A 5.1 (p.5-21) 164 Include:"This project may mean that some vehicle traffic lanes may need to be narrowed,parking may need to be adjusted or eliminated,and a vehicle traffic lane occasionally may need to be eliminated." TR-A 5.5 (p.5-21) Eliminate:“consider.” Section:Air Mobility (p.5-24) TR-P7.2 (p.5-25) “Work with the FAA and aircraft operators to minimize conflicts with residential areas and sensitive receptors.” Suggested Action:Remove Leaded Aviation Fuel within 3 years.(Santa Clara County has done this.) Chapter 7:Conservation,Open Space,and Working Lands Element COS-A14.1 (p.7-43) (a)“Prohibit new and expanded oil and gas production wells in the following: (a)iii “Areas within 3,200 feet of sensitive receptors or urban land use designations….” We appreciate this implicit acknowledgement of the health and safety dangers associated with proximity to oil and gas drilling,but would like to see even stronger protection in place. Current research shows that a 3,200-foot setback from drilling sites is actually on the lower end of the range of distances that could reduce the harmful health and quality of life impacts from toxic emissions and exposures.A 2021 Stanford study found negative health impacts within a 2.5 mile radius from oil and gas facilities.[2.5 miles =13,200 ft.] The state investigatory panel that declared 3,200′setbacks the minimum protective distance also found that the most health-protective approach is no drilling at all. 165 Moreover,HS-P1.4 “[requires]new industrial development to locate significant pollution sources as far away from sensitive receptors as possible.”To achieve internal consistency within the General Plan,and to promote maximal health and safety protection,drilling setback requirements in COS-A14.1 should be made to align with this principle. (b)“Restrict oil and gas drilling operations to agricultural zoning district only.” Suggested Action:Remove (b).Rationale:Oil and gas drilling in agriculturally-zoned lands contradicts the goal stated in COS-P2.8 “to increase,enhance,and protect agricultural land and its production capabilities.”It also undermines the “County’s agricultural preservation goals”referenced in COS-A2.3. If agriculturally-zoned land is to be used for any purpose other than agricultural-related, that activity should be limited to renewable energy production known to be compatible with agriculture.One example of this is the planting of shade-tolerant crops under solar installations. (e)Include performance standards related to water quality,air quality,odors, noise and aesthetics. Suggested wording:Performance standards relating to water quality should explicitly include impacts on groundwater aquifers,including groundwater levels,which would be consistent with COS-P8.1:“Protect public water supplies by denying applications for projects that would introduce significant new pollution sources in groundwater basins and watersheds feeding major reservoirs.” (f)Add an additional requirement for the regular,periodic monitoring of methane and other dangerous emissions by County Hazardous Materials staff.Current oil and gas production in the County is woefully under-monitored by state regulators (CalGEM field inspection is severely understaffed),leaving Contra Costa residents at risk.This would be consistent with HS-A2.2,which calls for “data collection,monitoring of pollution exposure,and identification and implementation of solutions in Impacted Communities.” The monitoring needed near oil and gas infrastructure would necessarily extend beyond listed AB 617 communities. Finally,we applaud the commitment to develop a “feasibility study”and a new land use ordinance that would amend the County Ordinance Code to prohibit development of new oil and gas wells and phase out existing oil and gas well 166 operations.We note the alignment here with SC-A2.1,which proposes studying “the feasibility of implementing an amortization process to eliminate non-conforming land uses.” It is our understanding that this process would begin after approval of the General Plan by the Board of Supervisors,which is likely to occur in late summer 2024.The study and ordinance development could reasonably take a year or more beyond that. We therefore propose an urgency moratorium during this time to prevent any more permit approvals while the new ordinance is in process.Communities adjacent to Contra Costa oil fields must be fully protected while new policy is developed.And,in conformance with the County’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency,climate-protective actions which reduce GHG emissions must not be delayed. Conservation,Open Space and Working Lands Element Performance Measures (p.7-46) Add:the following measure for review every five years: Increased quantity of renewable energy sources,including wind power generation systems and solar energy facilities,along with microgrids,battery energy storage systems,and associated technologies. Chapter 8:Public Facilities and Services Element Section:Just and Equitable Facilities and Services PFS-A2.3 (p.8-6) Suggest changing to:Implement and maintain urban greening and green infrastructure, such as sustainable/green street projects,in Impacted Communities. PFS-A2.4 (p.8-6) Suggest changing to:Regularly assess Code Enforcement responses and Public Works maintenance practices to ensure equitable implementation.Prioritize resources to keep Impacted Communities safe and clean,emphasizing enforcement actions on issues identified in Community Profiles 167 PFS-A2.6 (p.8-6) Suggest changing to:Pursue public-private partnerships that will improve access to reliable,fast internet and make digital resources available in Impacted Communities at affordable prices. Chapter 9:Health and Safety Element Section:Air Quality HS-P1.2 (p.9-4) As written:“Participate in emission and exposure reduction,public education ...and other programs that promote improved air quality,focusing on impacted Communities.” Strengthen language:Change “participate in”to “prioritize.” HS-P1.3 (p.9-4) It’s not clear where to find the information indicated by the asterisk (and subsequent asterisks). HS-P1.4 (p.9-4) “Require new industrial development to locate significant pollution sources as far away from sensitive receptors as possible.” Better:“at the maximum distance possible from sensitive receptors.” HS-P1.6 (p.9-4) “Require that any mitigation of air quality impacts occur on-site to the extent feasible to provide the greatest benefit to local residents.For mitigation that relies on offsets, require that the offsets be obtained from sources as near to the project site as possible. If the project site is within or adjacent to an Impacted Community,require that offsets/mitigation be located within that community unless determined infeasible by the County.*” 168 Without explanatory material—where exactly is the information to which the asterisk refers?—it is very hard to understand this requirement.Offsets are not even defined in the Glossary,and absolutely should be.Does this possibly reference BAAQMD’s Regulation 2,Rule 2,and the Air District’s emissions offset program?The rule applies to major-NSR (New Source Review)projects which produce precursor organic compounds (POC),oxides of nitrogen (NOX),and PM2.5,all with adverse health impacts. We strongly agree that direct reduction of emissions at the source should always be prioritized,and hope not see any approval of projects that would require mitigation from offsets.This would be consistent with SC-A1.3 (e). Perhaps the County can clarify where in its jurisdiction offsets are currently used and how they might be employed in the future? To be consistent with EJ commitments,it is essential that no pollution trade-off causes any Impacted Community to experience “offset”pollution. Section:Air Quality in Impacted Communities HS-P1.10 (p.9-5) “Support efforts to provide HVAC upgrades and portable clean air filters to persons who live in Impacted Communities and other areas burdened by disproportionate exposure to poor air quality.” Add:Provide air filtration in schools that are in close proximity to industrial facilities. HS-A2.1 (p.9-8) “Partner with community members and regulatory agencies to prepare a community-scale plan for reducing and mitigating air pollutant emissions and industrial hazards,such as pipeline risks,accidents,potential water or soil contamination,and impacts to sensitive ecological resources for each Impacted Community,or group of Impacted Communities,as appropriate.” Add:monitoring and data collection to the community-scale plan,as in HS-A2.2. 169 HS-A2.3 (p.9-8) “Conduct a housing condition survey in Impacted Communities to identify units likely requiring upgrades to provide adequate protection from toxic releases.Based on the survey’s findings,target outreach to provide information about weatherization and similar improvement programs.” Add:Additionally,in Impacted Communities where housing is owned and managed by the County,conduct Health Impact Assessments on an annual basis,and evaluate the feasibility of relocating residents living directly on the fenceline of heavily polluting facilities. Section:Greenhouse Gases Greenhouse Gases Description “To support its GHG emissions reduction goals,[and State climate goals],the County strives for net-carbon neutrality through a [gradual]transition to renewable and carbon-free fuels….” Add the bracketed reference to State goals,and substitute “timely”or “expeditious”for “gradual.” HS-A3.1 (p.9-10) Regarding (d):GHG reduction measures and strategies with quantifiable outcomes Add:“including measurable goals or policies that track actual emissions reductions achieved,such as amount of waste diverted or number of buildings converted to electric appliances. Regarding (f):The implementation and monitoring program needs to include reporting at least annually.The reporting also needs to be easy for the public to access,so that county residents can be updated and adequately prepared to participate in future plan revisions.Some type of a dashboard like that used by San Jose is recommended to track measurable goals around work and progress to date. 170 Section:Climate Change,Resilience,and Adaption HS-P4.3 (p.9-13) “Discourage new below-market-rate housing in High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones,the Wildland-Urban Interface,and Alquist-Priolo Fault Zones.If below-market-rate housing must be constructed within these zones,require it to be hardened or make use of nature-based solutions to ensure it remains habitable to the greatest extent possible.” Comment:This should apply to all new housing.Catastrophic wildfire threatens everyone in its path,regardless of race or class,and any new housing in fire-prone areas potentially impacts all surrounding communities. HS-P4.6 (p.9-13) “In hazard-prone areas,such as slopes exceeding 15 percent,mapped floodplains, High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones,and Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones,allow for decreased residential density,including below the minimum density requirement for the applicable land use designation,as the severity of risk increases.*” Substitute “encourage”for “allow.” Section:Sea level rise HS-P6.3 (p.9-26) “Require new industrial development in areas subject to sea-level rise,emergent groundwater flooding,or tsunami inundation to provide plans for prevention and remediation of any contaminant releases induced by these hazards,along with bonds that guarantee remediation plans are implemented.Remediation should meet standards that protect people and the environment in the event of future permanent inundation.” Comment:This requirement should also apply to existing industrial facilities.(Perhaps it could be better incorporated into HS-P9.5). 171 Section:Management of Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste. HS-P9.5 (p.9-42) “Require facilities that manage hazardous materials or hazardous waste in stationary or fixed storage tanks and that are in areas at risk of inundation from sea-level rise and flooding to conduct sea-level rise studies to address the risk of hazardous materials release from rising water levels,including rising groundwater.Require these facilities to incorporate best management practices to reduce the risk of release.” Additionally,facilities should “provide plans for prevention and remediation of any contaminant releases ...along with bonds that guarantee remediation plans are implemented,”per HS-P6.3. HS-P9.9 (p.9-43) Change:“discourage,”“prohibit.” Thank you again for the opportunity to offer these comments and suggested language changes. We look forward to discussing key points with you and getting your feedback on the items in this letter. Signed by: Shoshana Wechsler,Sunflower Alliance Marti Roach and Lisa Jackson,350 Contra Costa Action. Arthur Bart-Williams,Grid Alternatives Bay Area Bruce Ohlson,Bike East Bay 172 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Staff Report 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CA 94553 File #:24-1279 Agenda Date:5/13/2024 Agenda #:9. TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Date:May 13, 2024 Subject:Communication, New, Miscellaneous Items of Interest to the Committee Submitted For:TRANSPORTATION, WATER, & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Department:DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Referral No:N/A Referral Name:N/A Presenter:John Cunningham | DCD Contact:John Cunningham (925)655-2896 Referral History: This is a standing item on the TWIC Agenda. Referral Update: ·April 26, 2024: Santa Barbara Independent |E-Bikes Need More and Bigger Bike Lanes ·April 30, 2024: CCTA: Regional Transportation Planning Committee Memo ·January 8, 2024: San Mateo Daily Journal |New bill pushes Bay Area transit consolidation ·April 26, 2024: Press Release:AC Transit, and BART Announce Partnership with Spare Labs to Modernize Paratransit Services Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): RECEIVE information and DIRECT staff as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): None. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Printed on 5/8/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™173  Support theS.B. Independent Got aScoop? E-bikes Need More and Bigger Bike Lanes Cities Need to Build Infrastructure for the Future By Trisalyn Nelson Fri Apr 26, 2024 | 3:04pm Santa Barbarians have already embraced a exible, affordable, and sustainable form of transportation — the e-bike. | Credit: Courtesy Earlier this month, Santa Barbara’s City Council released a climate action plan that set the goal of being climate neutral by 2035. In the U.S., 30 percent of carbon emissions are from transpor tation. To become a climate-neutral city, we will need sustainable transportation options. 174 Santa Barbarians have already embraced a exible, affordable, and sustainable form of transportation — the e-bike. It makes sense. Santa Barbara’s geography is perfect for e-biking. We have fair weather year- round, low density, and lots of hills. Additionally, e-bikes have been shown to increase the distance people will travel (from about 3 to 6 miles) and increase the number of women riders. Recent data collected by my team at UC Santa Barbara shows that in Santa Barbara and Goleta, e-bikes account for nearly 50 percent of all bikes. Not everyone is delighted by the arrival of e-bikes on our streets. E-bikes are disrupting transportation in Santa Barbara. In par t, because e-biking is happening on roads and paths that were not designed for their use. Consequently, people are concerned about safety, especially the safety of our teenagers. The evidence on how to incorporate e-biking safely on our roads is still being compiled. So how do we set policy to improve e-bike safety today? The answer is to build more and bigger bike lanes. All evidence shows that bicyclist safety requires separation from motor vehicles. When there is a strong barrier between vehicles and bikes, the odds of crashing are one-tenth that of biking near cars. Adding e-bikes to bike lanes has some of the same challenges as having fast and slow bicyclists sharing the same space. The behavior and speed of a spandex-clad bicyclist aiming to set a personal record is not the same as a typical commuter or a family riding with young children. Especially for heavily used bike lanes, fast bicyclists maneuvering around slower bicyclists can cause conict and crashes. Interestingly, similar safety issues also emerge when walkers and bicyclists share the same space. We are still conducting research that will provide decision makers with evidence on the best way to integrate e-bikes safely into our transportation network. However, we do have a wealth of research that has shown that different modes of transportation tend to be safest when separated from other modes. Vehicle drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians all benet from having their own space. Even mixing pedestrians and bicycles on multi-use paths has been shown to increase risk of crashes, and the recommendation is to create more space and designate use areas. More and bigger bike lanes will help us build a transportation system that is future proofed. It will be able to handle increased demands and have enough space for multiple types of transpor tation that will be needed to meet climate goals. Even the best bike infrastructure will not completely stop the risky behaviors of teen e-bikers. I have seen the same things you have — kids e-biking on phones, no helmets, and multiple people on one bike. But, some of the most dangerous behavior, such as sidewalk riding, is the result of not having appropriate safe space for e-biking, and separating e-bikes from cars will reduce the consequence associated with a lot of risky behavior we commonly see on e-bikes. 175 To be sure, the carbon benets of e-bikes cannot be accomplished with other electric vehicles (EVs) alone. The carbon required to make an electric vehicle, cost of purchase, and impact on the grid means EVs cannot be the only solution. E-bikes are less expensive, more sustainable to build, and run on much less energy. E-bikes and EVs complement one another, and many forms of transportation should be supported if we hope to make carbon neutrality real. Cities need to build infrastructure for the future. More and bigger bike lanes will future proof our transpor tation network, supporting transportation changes needed to reach climate neutrality. E-bikes are disruption, but the tension brought by disruption is an opportunity for change and innovation. Santa Barbara can be a national leader in how to build a carbon-neutral city and transportation system, which must include safe e-biking. Imagine if we succeed! Fewer cars, less air pollution, reduced carbon emissions, and more freedom to move safely and sustainably through our city. Trisalyn Nelson is the Dangermond Chair of Geography and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project and the University of California, Santa Barbara. In 2014, Prof. Nelson founded BikeMaps.org website for crowdsourcing bicycle safety data globally. Mon Apr 29, 2024 | 21:02pm https://www.independent.com/2024/04/26/e-bikes-need-more-and-bigger-bike-lanes/ 176 COMMISSIONERS Newell Arnerich, Chair Lamar Hernandez- Thorpe, Vice Chair Ken Carlson Paul Fadelli Federal Glover Loella Haskew Chris Kelley Aaron Meadows Sue Noack Scott Perkins Renata Sos Timothy Haile, Executive Director 2999 Oak Road Suite 100 Walnut Creek CA 94597 PHONE: 925.256.4700 FAX: 925.256.4701 www.ccta.net MEMORANDUM To: Matt Todd, TRANSPAC Chris Weeks, SWAT Robert Sarmiento, TRANSPLAN Sai Midididdi, TVTC John Nemeth, WCCTAC Sivakumar Natarajan, LPMC From: Timothy Haile, Executive Director Date: April 30, 2024 Re: Items of interest for circulation to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs) At its April 17, 2024 meeting, the Authority discussed and approved the following agenda item recommendations, which may be of interests to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees: A. The Authority Board received two informational Quarterly Project Status Reports providing the status of the current Measure Projects. B. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 694 with OpenGov, Inc. in the amount of $379,535, to provide budgeting software solutions, training, and support services, and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. C. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Funding Agreement No. 674 with the City of Concord, to provide local match funding in the amount of $155,473 to match the $1.2 million in awarded Community Project 177 RTPC Memorandum April 30, 2024 Page 2 Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending Grant funds, which will be applied towards all phases of the Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization (Project 31007), and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. D. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Funding Agreement No. 672 with the Town of Danville, to provide local match funding in the amount of $129,561 to match the $1 million in awarded Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending Grant funds, which will be applied towards all phases of the Intelligent Transportation Systems/Traffic Signal Modernization (Project 31008), and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. E. The Authority Board approved Resolution 24‐17‐P, which will appropriate $115,000 in Measure J Program 28b funds for the Richmond Parkway Transportation Plan. F. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Real Property Services Agreement No. 692 with Contra Costa County in the amount of $320,000, for Right‐of‐Way acquisition services for the Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements, Phases 1, 2A, and 4 (Project 6001), and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐substantive changes to the language. G. The Authority Board approved Resolution 24‐15‐G supporting Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority’s allocation request for Regional Measure 3 funds in the amount of $6,670,000 for bus replacement and a hydrogen fueling station and approved forwarding the resolution and recommendation to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission H. The Authority Board approved sending the preliminary draft fiscal year 2024‐25 Congestion Management Agency budget to the Chair of the Public Managers' Association for circulation and approval from each member and authorized staff to make minor refinements to the budget as‐needed prior to circulation. 178 RTPC Memorandum April 30, 2024 Page 3 I. The Authority Board authorized the Chair to execute Agreement No. 693 with Zoon, in an amount not‐to‐exceed $4 million, to provide PPM services for the construction program from April 17, 2024 through June 30, 2029, and allowed the Executive Director or designee to make any non‐ substantive changes to the language. *To view the full meeting packet with additional agenda item information, please visit our meetings webpage here. Attachments to the Authority Board packet can be found in the Administration and Projects Committee and Planning Committee packets as referenced in the staff report. 179 https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/new-bill-pushes-bay-area-transit-consolidation/article_9a33af5c-ae0a- 11ee-b99b-0f843e5bd27a.html FEATURED New bill pushes Bay Area transit consolidation State senator aims for regiional transportation mergers By Alyse DiNapoli, Daily Journal staff Jan 8, 2024 Bay Area transit consolidation talks are building momentum at the state level, as state Sen. Aisha Wahab, D-Hayward, introduced a bill on Thursday, Jan. 4, requiring the California State Transportation Agency to create a consolidation plan for the nearly 30 transit agencies across the Bay Area’s nine counties. 180 Senate Bill 397 is a result of what Wahab says is a piecemeal transit network that fails to substantively provide better ridership experiences, not to mention improved scal positions. “It never made sense that there are 27 ofcial public agencies in the region. ... If each agency had ve board members or more, that’s well over 100 people making decisions for the Bay Area,” she said. “There are way too many chefs in the kitchen.” Stunning New Camper Vans New Camper Vans Are Turning Heads And On Sale. Discover Deals With Top Searches All Things Auto Open While the bill does not mandate action on specic strategies, it states the California Transportation Agency would have to develop an outline of how consolidation could be achieved. Aisha Wahab 181 Consolidation talks have become more commonplace within the Metropolitan Transportation Commission — a regional nancing and coordination body across the Bay Area — which recently conducted polling and research on how the public feels about agency mergers, as well as how the commission can strengthen their authority over local agencies. State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, is also expected to introduce legislation over the next month related to the matter. But Michael Pimentel, executive director of the California Transit Association, said such an overhaul would undermine existing network enhancement efforts. “Work is currently underway to better coordinate the services provided by Bay Area transit agencies. What’s more, the state has just launched a new process, created as part of last year’s transit funding package, to facilitate a more connected transit system statewide,” he said. “We believe these processes should be completed, and their improvements implemented, before the legislature considers legislation that would have signicant and sweeping impacts on governance structures, state and local funding programs, and transit agency workforces.” Such discussions have also caused friction between some of San Mateo County’s transit agencies and the MTC. Some board members on Caltrain and SamTrans, the county’s transportation agency, have voiced opposition to such mergers, citing the negative impacts it would have on their relatively healthy scal position and operations, particularly compared to BART, which faces a $300 million budget decit. Stunning New Camper Vans New Camper Vans Are Turning Heads And On Sale. Discover Deals With Top Searches All Things Auto Open During a December SamTrans meeting, Board Member Marina Fraser said a Caltrain- BART consolidation would result in the county’s taxpayer funds being drained into BART, and that the rail agency should “clean up their own house before they try to look at other people who are doing well.” 182 Alyse DiNapoli, Daily Journal staff Daily Journal staff MTC Commissioner and Millbrae Councilmember Gina Papan has also repeatedly voiced concern over BART’s mismanagement and stated the MTC should instead focus on providing stricter oversight of poorly performing agencies. But Wahab noted local transit leaders must focus on what is best for regional ridership, not on preserving their own agencies in a silo. “The Bay Area is not one specic city. We represent a region, and that’s how it should be thought about,” she said. “Everyone wants their own little kingdom … and, at the end of the day, people are choosing to use their own vehicles because driving is faster in almost any scenario. I think this bill pushes the conversation on the real issue of consolidation.” She also stated MTC should be given more authority over transit agencies to make swifter and meaningful reforms, stating they currently “have to babysit agencies,” especially those who are not performing as well. SB 397 will be discussed in the Senate Transportation Committee on Jan. 9 and will have until Jan. 31 to pass the Senate. alyse@smdailyjournal.com (650) 344-5200 ext. 102 alyse@smdailyjournal.com (650) 344-5200 ext. 102 183 April 26, 2024 ← P R E SS R E LE ASE S Spare, AC Transit, and BART Announce Par tnership to Modernize Paratransit Ser vices PRESS RELEASE FROM SPARE 184 Press Contacts Lynda Chau lynda@sparelabs.com VANCOUVER, Canada — Oakland, CA, April 26, 2024 — In a significant move to enhance public transportation for individuals with disabilities, Spare has announced a new par tnership with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). This collaboration aims to modernize paratransit services across the Bay Area, integrating Spare's fully automated transit platform to replace the outdated and manual system. "AC Transit and BART have a proud history of jointly providing Americans with Disability Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services for the past 30 years. Over the decades, however, innovations like GPS, vehicle capacity, traffic sensors, and more have revolutionized the on-time performance and frequency of public transit but have not blazed the same trail in paratransit,” said Michael Hursh, CEO & General Manager of AC Transit, speaking on behalf of both AC Transit and BART. 185 "As a result, the policymaking boards of each Bay Area transit agency have awarded Spare a $4.5 million contract to overhaul the nearly 25-year-old East Bay Paratransit (EBP) system’s operating platform. Spare's turnkey implementation will soon offer EBP the modernity of dynamic vehicle optimization, self-service trip booking and cancellations, all- new call center features, and a contactless paratransit fare payment application, to name a few," added Hursh. "Spare's track record of cost control, reliable product, and its people will do much more than upgrade East Bay Paratransit's operating platform. Instead, it promises to elevate the commute to medical facilities, schools, workplaces, and social engagements for some of the Bay Area’s most deserving riders," said AC Transit's CEO and General Manager, Michael Hursh. With Spare’s innovative soware as a foundation, EBP also has the opportunity to commingle their paratransit with future microtransit services and leverage the combined fleets to offer extensive flexibility to riders and achieve even greater cost efficiency. "Building on AC Transit and BART 's longstanding commitment to providing ADA complementary paratransit services, Spare is excited to contribute to the next era of enhanced transit solutions," said Spare CEO Kristoffer Vik Hansen. “We're poised to support AC Transit and BART in making significant improvements in accessibility and suppor t for Bay Area paratransit riders, ensuring their journeys are efficient, positive and empowering.” ### 186 About Spare specializes in providing transit agencies with the technology to launch microtransit services and modernize ADA paratransit systems. The company focuses on enhancing transportation access for underserved communities, offering a comprehensive suite of soware tools tailored to meet each agency's unique requirements. Known for powering over 10 million rides globally, Spare is recognized as a reliable provider of ADA-paratransit and microtransit solutions and has partnered with top agencies such as Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), Pinellas Suncoast Transit Agency (PSTA) and Austin’s CapMetro. For more information, please visit www.sparelabs.com. POST SHARE POST PRINT EMAIL 187