Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 09132021 - TWIC Agenda Pkt
TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE September 13, 2021 9:00 A.M. 1025 Escobar St., Martinez To slow the spread of COVID-19, in lieu of a public gathering, the Transportation Water and Infrastructure meetings will be remote until further notice and accessible via link to all members of the public as permitted by the Governor’s Executive Order N29-20. Supervisor Candace Andersen, Chair Supervisor Diane Burgis, Vice Chair Agenda Items: Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee You are invited to a Zoom meeting When: Sep 13, 2021 09:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Topic: TWIC Please click the link below to join the meeting: https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/84617825413 Or Telephone, dial: USA 214 765 0478 US Toll USA 888 278 0254 US Toll-free Conference code: 198675 1.Introductions 2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes). 3.Administrative Items, if applicable. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development) 4.REVIEW record of meeting for August 9, 2021, Transportation, Water and September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 1 of 100 4.REVIEW record of meeting for August 9, 2021, Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee Meeting. This record was prepared pursuant to the Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205 (d) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Any handouts or printed copies of testimony distributed at the meeting will be attached to this meeting record. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development). (Page 5) 5.ACCEPT the Draft Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2021/2022 to 2027/2028, open a public comment period, and schedule a public hearing to be held November 8, 2021. (Gus Amirzehni, Department of Public Works) (Page 8) 6.ACCEPT the recommendations from the Hazardous Materials Commission to address the potential impacts of sea level rise and DIRECT staff as appropriate.(Michael Kent, Health Services) (Page 70) 7.CONSIDER report on Local, State, Regional, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development) (Page 79) 8.The next meeting is currently scheduled for Monday, October 11, 2021. 9.Adjourn The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend TWIC meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of members of the TWIC less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at the County Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez during normal business hours. Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time. For Additional Information Contact: John Cunningham, Committee Staff Phone (925) 674-7833, Fax (925) 674-7250 john.cunningham@dcd.cccounty.us September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 2 of 100 Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in meetings of its Board of Supervisors and Committees. Following is a list of commonly used abbreviations that may appear in presentations and written materials at meetings of the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOB Area of Benefit BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BATA Bay Area Toll Authority BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BDCP Bay-Delta Conservation Plan BGO Better Government Ordinance (Contra Costa County) BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFS Cubic Feet per Second (of water) CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission DCC Delta Counties Coalition DCD Contra Costa County Dept. of Conservation & Development DPC Delta Protection Commission DSC Delta Stewardship Council DWR California Department of Water Resources EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District EIR Environmental Impact Report (a state requirement) EIS Environmental Impact Statement (a federal requirement) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HBRR Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation HOT High-Occupancy/Toll HOV High-Occupancy-Vehicle HSD Contra Costa County Health Services Department HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IPM Integrated Pest Management ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA/JEPA Joint (Exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LCC League of California Cities LTMS Long-Term Management Strategy MAC Municipal Advisory Council MAF Million Acre Feet (of water) MBE Minority Business Enterprise MOA Memorandum of Agreement MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Protection Act OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center PDA Priority Development Area PWD Contra Costa County Public Works Department RCRC Regional Council of Rural Counties RDA Redevelopment Agency or Area RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposals RFQ Request For Qualifications SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SR2S Safe Routes to Schools STIP State Transportation Improvement Program SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBE Women-Owned Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee WETA Water Emergency Transportation Authority WRDA Water Resources Development Act September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 3 of 100 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 3. Meeting Date:09/13/2021 Subject:Administrative Items, if applicable. Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: N/A Referral Name: N/A Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)655-2915 Referral History: This is an Administrative Item of the Committee. Referral Update: Staff will review any items related to the conduct of Committee business. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER Administrative items and Take ACTION as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): N/A Attachments No file(s) attached. September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 4 of 100 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 4. Meeting Date:09/13/2021 Subject:REVIEW record of meeting for August 9, 2021, Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Meeting. Submitted For: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE, Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: N/A Referral Name: N/A Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)655-2915 Referral History: County Ordinance (Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205, [d]) requires that each County Body keep a record of its meetings. Though the record need not be verbatim, it must accurately reflect the agenda and the decisions made in the meeting. Referral Update: Any handouts or printed copies of testimony distributed at the meeting will be attached to this meeting record. Links to the agenda and minutes will be available at the TWI Committee web page: http://www.cccounty.us/4327/Transportation-Water-Infrastructure Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): Staff recommends approval of the attached Record of Action for the August 9, 2021, Committee Meeting with any necessary corrections. Fiscal Impact (if any): N/A Attachments August TWIC Meeting Record September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 5 of 100 D R A F T TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE RECORD OF ACTION FOR August 9, 2021 Supervisor Candace Andersen, Chair Supervisor Diane Burgis , Vice Chair Present: Candace Andersen, Chair Diane Burgis, Vice Chair 1.Introductions 2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes). No public comment. 3.CONSIDER Administrative items and Take ACTION as appropriate. There was discussion regarding the timing of transitioning back to in-person meetings. The committee advised staff that the September meeting would be on zoom. After September the status of meetings is unknown due to the delta covid variant. 4.Staff recommends approval of the attached Record of Action for the May 10, 2021, Committee Meeting with any necessary corrections. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the meeting record. 5.ACCEPT the update from the Hazardous Materials Commission concerning actions they have taken to respond to the direction given them at the April 12, 2021, TWIC meeting concerning sea level rise, and DIRECT staff as appropriate. The Committee ACCEPTED the report and concurred with staff that it would be appropriate to return with a final report at the September/October TWIC meeting. September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 6 of 100 6.APPROVE the selection of the Appian Way Undergrounding Project as the next project for the Contra Costa County Rule 20A Underground Utility Program, and AUTHORIZE the Director of Public Works, on behalf of the County, to initiate technical field reviews with utility-related members of the Underground Utility Advisory Committee, including PG&E, AT&T, and Comcast, develop and finalize the scope, geographic boundaries, and cost estimate. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the staff recommendations, discussion included confirmation that the Public Utilities Commission is eliminating the underground utility program and that the Appian Way project is likely to exhaust the County's undergrounding program, the Committee directed staff to return with information on how other agencies are funding their undergrounding programs. 7.RECEIVE report on the preparation of a draft Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The Board of Supervisors will consider adopting the draft GSP later this year per the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, and DIRECT staff as appropriate. The Committee RECEIVED the report and concurred with staff that the draft final should come back to TWIC prior to going to the full Board of Supervisors before the end of the year. 8.CONSIDER report on Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. The Committee RECEIVED the report. 9.The next meeting is currently scheduled for September 13, 2021. 10.Adjourn For Additional Information Contact: John Cunningham, Committee Staff Phone (925) 674-7833, Fax (925) 674-7250 john.cunningham@dcd.cccounty.us September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 7 of 100 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 5. Meeting Date:09/13/2021 Subject:Draft Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan for Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Submitted For: Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Department:Public Works Referral No.: 7 Referral Name: Review issues associated with County flood control facilities. Presenter: Gus Amirzehni, Public Works Department Contact: Gus Amirzehni, (925)313-2128 Referral History: The Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) is a programming document for the funding of flood control improvements within Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District). The goal is to inform the public and community stakeholders about flood control projects throughout Contra Costa County. It includes cost estimates, funding source, and scheduling information for potential projects over the next seven years. The Plan is prepared and updated under the guidance of the District Expenditure Policy and is intended to be a living document updated every two years or as needed. The last Plan was accepted by the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee on November 8, 2018, and adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 11, 2018. The referral of the Plan to this Committee was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September 18, 2018. Referral Update: The District has prepared the draft Plan for fiscal years 2021/2022 to 2027/2028. The draft Plan is presented to the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee to open a public comment period. In the next eight weeks, the draft Plan will be circulated for review and comment to community stakeholders and interested parties, including the Contra Costa Watershed Forum and the Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife Committee. A copy of the draft Plan will also be made available for public review at the District office and posted on the District website. After comments are received, considered and incorporated, staff will request that the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee hold a public hearing at its scheduled November 8, 2021, meeting before forwarding the Plan to the Board of Supervisors for final adoption. In summary, the draft Plan recommends 29 projects within the District representing an investment of approximately $56 million over a 7-year period. Approximately $39 million of this investment is planned to be directly funded through various flood control funds, and $13 million is currently September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 8 of 100 planned to come from other local, State, or federal grants. The remaining portion of this investment is currently unfunded, but as projects are further developed, additional funds are expected to be sought and received. As discussed above, the draft Plan is prepared under the guidance of the District’s Expenditure Policy, which sets expenditure priorities within three specific categories: System Preservation, Public Safety, and System Expansion. About 72% of the planned projects support the District's first program priority—System Preservation. About 27% support system expansion to reduce flood risks, while the remaining 1% improve public safety. Review and approval of the Plan does not automatically approve capital projects. Capital projects are subject to separate public review, engineering feasibility analysis, environmental assessment, and final approval by the Board of Supervisors. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): ACCEPT the draft Plan for fiscal years 2021/2022 to 2027/2028, open a public comment period, and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 8, 2018. Fiscal Impact (if any): Funding for the proposed projects is 100% from various flood control funds and grants with no impact to other County funds. As projects are developed, State and federal grants will be sought to augment District funds. Attachments CIP 2021 Final Draft September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 9 of 100 DRAFT Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan 2021 Update Fiscal Year 2021/2022–2027/2028 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 www.contracosta.ca.gov/5586/Flood-Control-District August 2021 DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 10 of 100 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 1 2. FUNDING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES .............................................................................................. 1 3. REVENUE SOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 2 4. 2021 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN........................................................................ 4 5. UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE PROJECTS.................................................................................................. 9 6. FUTURE UPDATES ................................................................................................................................. 9 7. CREDITS ............................................................................................................................................... 10 LIST OF FIGURES: Figure 1: 7-Year CIP Location Map Figure 2: 7-Year CIP Expenditure by Priority LIST OF TABLES: Table 1: 7-Year Flood Control CIP Overall Summary Table 2: 7-Year Flood Control CIP List Table 3: Unprogrammed Future Projects List APPENDICES: Appendix A: Detailed Project Information Appendix B: Unprogrammed Future Projects Details DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 11 of 100 2021 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1.INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a programming document for the funding of capital flood control projects within the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District). The District’s jurisdictional boundary covers the entire Contra Costa County and includes cities in addition to the unincorporated County communities. The flood control infrastructure includes 79 miles of flood control channels, 29 dams and detention basins, and 47 drop structures throughout the County. These facilities are on 4,189 parcels covering over 1,500 acres and provide the regional backbone of flood protection in Contra Costa County. The CIP is prepared in accordance with the District’s Expenditure Policy and presented to the Board of Supervisors for approval. This CIP is intended to be updated often, and it provides a 7-year outlook on the District’s capital activities in support of the regional, long-range development and related flood control plans. It is recognized that local communities have direct interest in the regional flood control projects and that those projects can impact a wide range of stakeholders. Therefore, the District is committed to developing projects in an open, community-based planning process. Furthermore, development of consistent stormwater management strategies in the region requires close coordination between local governments, regulators, as well as developers and landowners. The regional stormwater management strategies include concepts for comprehensive watershed management and resilient and sustainable design integration. To the extent feasible, those strategies and concepts have been incorporated into the development of this CIP. It is the intention of the District to continue to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to coordinate the implementation of regional drainage improvements. Approval of this CIP by the Board of Supervisors does not automatically approve projects for implementation. Flood control projects typically require years of advance planning, coordination, and cooperation between various agencies and community stakeholders. This CIP is prepared as a programmatic, planning-level document that intends to guide the District to program and initiate preliminary engineering work on the identified projects. Each project must undergo its own individual feasibility analysis and environmental assessment. As such, scope, schedule, and cost of each project is preliminary and may change after additional reviews. Some projects may later prove to be infeasible or not cost-effective and may be dropped from subsequent plans. 2.FUNDING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES Over the years, the District’s revenues have been constrained by fiscally-restrictive, statewide ballot measures, while the cost of operations and maintenance has increased significantly due to DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 12 of 100 more stringent regulatory requirements and aging facilities. As a result, deferred maintenance has created over $39 million backlog of facility repair and restoration work throughout the District. In 2005, in response to these challenges and increasing demand for more capital improvements, the Board of Supervisors, as the governing Board of the District, established the Flood Control Expenditure Policy to provide overall fiscal programming direction and guidance to staff in developing the District’s capital improvement program. That Policy, generally, dictates that the District establish CIPs and give the highest priority to those projects that preserve the existing infrastructure and extend the useful life of a facility. 3. REVENUE SOURCES Funds for flood control improvements are mainly derived from property tax assessments, development and special benefit fees, and federal and state grants. Property tax and fee assessments are typically collected through various Flood Control Zones, Drainage Areas, and Benefit Assessment Areas. These zones and areas have been established throughout the District over the years. A map of established Drainage Areas and Drainage Zones is shown in Figure 1. The following provides a summary description of funding sources from those zones, areas, and other revenue sources: A. Flood Control Zone Property Tax Assessments Flood Control Zones were established over entire watersheds to fund the design, construction, and maintenance of flood control and water conservation facilities in the watershed. Funding resources vary from Zone to Zone with some Zones having no operating funds. In most cases, funding is not sufficient to maintain existing improvements, construct additional drainage facilities needed to provide the desired level of flood protection, or restore flood control channels to sustainable natural systems 1. There are 14 identified major watershed Flood Control Zones in the District. Ten Flood Control Zones have been formed, but only five generate tax revenue. B. Drainage Area Fees Drainage Areas were formed, as subwatersheds of Flood Control Zones, to provide funding for the construction of drainage improvements needed to mitigate increased storm runoff resulting from development within the subwatershed area2. Drainage Areas typically do not provide funding for ongoing maintenance of the DA improvements. There are 180 Drainage Areas identified in the District representing small watersheds or subwatersheds. Sixty-three of the Drainage Areas have been formed and have an adopted plan and a drainage fee ordinance. These are in areas where development has, is, or will be occurring. As such, revenues from these areas are dependent on the housing and land development economy. 1 Funding discrepancy between Zones is mainly due to Proposition 13, which effectively fixed property tax rates and constrained the District’s ability to raise new revenues. 2 Drainage Areas are analogous to the “Areas of Benefits” or “AOB” that collect revenues and fund transportation projects. DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 13 of 100 kjkjkj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj {1}{3B} {2} {9} {7} {8} {12}{11}{6A} {8A} [5][3][1] [27] [10] [115] [139] [232] [227] [222][220] [218][217] [215] [213] [211] [210][209] [207] [130] [127] [122] [121] [118] [110] [109] [108] [107] [106] (108) (109) (55) (104) (56)(73) (107)(105)(46) (67) (9) (8) (10) (48B) (57) (106) (72) (13) (62) (128) (76) (30C) (52C) (89)(87)(30A) (33A) (30B) (75A) (47) (22) (101A) (29H)(40A) (48C) (16) (44B) (88) (52A) (29C) (33C) (78) (37A) (29J) (48D) (29G) (19A) (52B) (15A) (29E)(52D) (33B) (37A) Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Legend kj Project Locations [ID #] Drainage Areas (DA#) Drainage Zones {DZ#} Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District7-Year CIP (2021-2028)Location Map ¯ 0 63 Miles Figure 1 kj kj kjkj{7} {6A} [5] [3] [1] [27] (19A) (73)3rdMarket 6thBrook s i d e 5thParr 1stRichmond14th15thSilver 16th2ndRumrill17th7thPittsburg GiantDavilla MartinFolsomCentral SotoClareRichmondkj kj kj kj kj{3B}[118] [109] [108] [107] [106] (89) (57) (87) (88) (72) (78)(16)(128)(62)I 680State Hwy 4 Taylor D e t r o i t Muir State Hwy 242WalkwayCenter I ron Ho rse 6th Contra CostaIdaP a c h e c o SalvioViking 5thKiki M e a d o w BImhoff El l i s Pi n eMorelloAvon FStanwell3rdDRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 14 of 100 C. Drainage Area Benefit Assessments Drainage Area Benefit Assessments (DABA) are funds that are typically used on operation, maintenance, and repair of storm drainage facilities in a defined drainage benefit assessment area. There are currently seven DABAs established in the District. D. Drainage Area Tax Assessments Three of the 63 formed Drainage Areas receive a small portion of tax revenue in addition to, or instead of, developer fees. Drainage Area property tax revenue is typically spent on the design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of storm drainage facilities within the Drainage Area. E. Federal and State Grants The District has been successful in seeking and obtaining various state and federal grants for many of its projects in the recent past and continues to pursue those sources actively for future projects. In general, federal and state grants are becoming more competitive and very limited for single-purpose, flood control projects. This is a change from past decades when state and federal grants provided a majority of the District’s capital funding. Most grants now provide assistance to projects that provide grant-specific environmental benefits. This is another incentive for the District to incorporate environmental components to its flood control projects in order to be competitive with state and federal grants. 4. 2021 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN In accordance with its Expenditure Policy, the District sets priorities within three specific program categories in establishing its capital program. These priorities are then balanced with the available funding in given Flood Control Zones or Drainage Areas to ensure the most feasible project delivery. The program categories in order of priority are: 1. System Preservation 2. Public Safety 3. System Expansion Based on the Expenditure Policy framework, a total of 29 projects representing an investment of over $56 million over seven years makeup this plan’s recommended projects. Figure 1 shows the geographic location of the proposed projects. Table 1 below provides an overall summary of recommended projects by funding entity highlighting project locations by watershed/major creek. Each location shown on the list may have several projects in various phases of development and implementation. It must be noted that some of the recommended projects are partially unfunded. Approximately $39 million is planned to be funded through various flood control funds and $13 million is planned to come from other local, State, or federal grants. An additional $4 million will be needed to fully DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 15 of 100 Table 1. 7-Year Flood Control Capital Improvement Overall Summary (By Fund Source/Creek) Funding Source/Creek FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 Totals Flood Control Zone 1 200,000$ 130,000$ 180,000$ 360,000$ 468,000$ 1,640,000$ 420,000$ 3,398,000$ Dry -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 210,000$ 350,000$ Marsh *200,000$ 130,000$ 180,000$ 360,000$ 468,000$ 1,500,000$ 210,000$ 3,048,000$ -$ Flood Control Zone 3B 695,000$ 5,066,000$ 5,220,000$ 2,830,000$ 190,000$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 14,061,000$ Galindo -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 60,000$ Grayson *215,000$ 486,000$ 1,540,000$ 2,670,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,911,000$ Grayson/Murderers *150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Lower Walnut Creek 230,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 590,000$ Pine -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 190,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Walnut 100,000$ 4,400,000$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Flood Control Zone 6A - San Pablo -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ Flood Control Zone 7 - Wildcat -$ 47,000$ -$ -$ 47,000$ -$ -$ 94,000$ Drainage Area 10 -$ 40,000$ 860,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ Drainage Area 13 -$ -$ 300,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ Drainage Area 46 - Grayson/Murderer's *-$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ 1,154,000$ Drainage Area 56 - Antioch 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,067,000$ 817,000$ 99,000$ 102,000$ 102,000$ 2,587,000$ Drainage Area 73 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Drainage Area 130 102,000$ 91,000$ 187,000$ 227,000$ 1,936,000$ 6,359,750$ 5,758,750$ 14,661,500$ Deer 22,000$ 11,000$ 66,000$ 116,000$ 1,043,000$ 5,143,000$ -$ 6,401,000$ Marsh *-$ -$ -$ -$ 11,000$ 77,000$ 578,000$ 666,000$ Sand Creek 80,000$ 80,000$ 121,000$ 111,000$ 882,000$ 1,139,750$ 5,180,750$ 7,594,500$ Grants 9,596,585$ 1,286,585$ 1,205,585$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,088,755$ Lower Walnut Creek 9,335,000$ 1,025,000$ 944,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wildcat 261,585$ 261,585$ 261,585$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Other - Grayson *140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ Unfunded -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 307,000$ 2,980,000$ 440,000$ 4,000,000$ Galindo -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ 440,000$ Grayson/Murderer's -$ -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ -$ 34,000$ Marsh -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,980,000$ -$ 2,980,000$ Wildcat -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 546,000$ Totals 10,983,585$ 7,299,585$ 9,919,585$ 6,912,000$ 3,693,000$ 11,101,750$ 6,760,750$ 56,670,255$ * Multiple funding source.DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 16 of 100 fund the projects. As projects are further developed, efforts will be made to seek additional resources. A more detailed list of all projects within each funding entity, including partially unfunded, is included in Table 2. As stated above, priorities set for each project are based on the framework outlined in the District’s Expenditure Policy. Approximately, 72% of planned capital expenditures will fund system preservation, while 27% will support system expansion in support of flood risk reduction. The remaining 1% will improve public safety. Figure 2 below shows the breakdown of capital expenditures by program priority. Figure 2. 7-Year CIP Expenditure by priority Additionally, detailed information about each project is included in Appendix A. The information provided for each project includes project name, description, justification, cost estimate, funding source(s), program priority, and anticipated expenditure plan category. Each project is assigned a unique number. Projects with numbers from 1 to 99 are located in West County, 100 to 199 are in Central County, and 200 and greater are in East County. Projects are presented in numerical order. Generally, all identified projects are led by the District; however, for the purpose of completeness, this CIP may include some projects that are co-funded by the District, but managed in partnership with other jurisdictions. It must be noted that in addition to capital projects, this CIP also includes several hydraulic, seismic, and condition assessment studies that support capital projects. System Preservation 72% System Expansion 27% Public Safety 1%DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 17 of 100 Table 2. 7-Year Flood Control Capital Improvement Project List (By Fund Source) Funding Source ID Project Title FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 Totals Flood Control Zone 1 200,000$ 130,000$ 180,000$ 360,000$ 468,000$ 1,640,000$ 420,000$ 3,398,000$ 210 Marsh Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment -$ 130,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 290,000$ 211 Dry Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 210,000$ 350,000$ 213 Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 468,000$ 1,500,000$ 210,000$ 2,278,000$ 227 Flood Control Zone 1 Facilities Condition Assessment [8360]200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 232 Marsh Creek Reservoir Emergency Spillway Rehabilitation -$ -$ 20,000$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ 280,000$ -$ Flood Control Zone 3B 695,000$ 5,066,000$ 5,220,000$ 2,830,000$ 190,000$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 14,061,000$ 107 Grayson and Walnut Creeks Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant 140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ 108 Grayson Creek Channel Fence Rehabilitation -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 109 Grayson Creek Sediment Removal 75,000$ 340,000$ 640,000$ 1,970,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3,025,000$ 110 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project 230,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 590,000$ 118 Walnut Creek Sediment Removal - Clayton Valley Drain to Drop Structure 1 100,000$ 4,400,000$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 121 Kubicek Basin Sediment Removal -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 122 Pine Creek Dam Seismic Assessment -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ 190,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 127 Galindo Creek Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 60,000$ 130 Flood Control Zone 3B Channels and Structures Conditions Assessment 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ Flood Control Zone 6A -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 1 San Pablo Creek Silt Survey -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ Flood Control Zone 7 -$ 47,000$ -$ -$ 47,000$ -$ -$ 94,000$ 3 Wildcat Creek Silt Survey $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 40,000$ 5 Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt $0 $27,000 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 -$ Drainage Area 10 -$ 40,000$ 860,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ DA 10 Facility Improvements -$ 40,000$ 860,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Drainage Area 13 -$ -$ 300,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 139 DA 13 Line F-1 Storm Drainage in Alamo -$ -$ 300,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ Drainage Area 46 -$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ 1,154,000$ 106 DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements -$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ -$ Drainage Area 56 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,067,000$ 817,000$ 99,000$ 102,000$ 102,000$ 2,587,000$ 207 Trembath Detention Basin 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,050,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ 209 Develop Revenue Generating Sites at Lindsey Basin -$ -$ 17,000$ 17,000$ 99,000$ 102,000$ 102,000$ 337,000$ DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 18 of 100 Funding Source ID Project Title FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 Totals -$ Drainage Area 73 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 10 DA 73 Drainage Plan Update - Richmond 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Drainage Area 130 102,000$ 91,000$ 187,000$ 227,000$ 1,936,000$ 6,359,750$ 5,758,750$ 14,661,500$ 215 Marsh Creek Supplemental Capacity -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,000$ 77,000$ 578,000$ 666,000$ 217 Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion 22,000$ 11,000$ 66,000$ 88,000$ 894,000$ 5,143,000$ -$ 6,224,000$ 218 Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion - R/W Acquisition -$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 149,000$ -$ -$ 177,000$ 220 Upper Sand Creek Basin Surplus Material 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ 222 Lower Sand Creek Basin Construction 20,000$ 20,000$ 61,000$ 111,000$ 882,000$ 1,139,750$ 5,180,750$ 7,414,500$ -$ Grants 9,596,585$ 1,286,585$ 1,205,585$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,088,755$ 110 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project 9,335,000$ 1,025,000$ 944,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,304,000$ 27 Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement -- Phase I 261,585$ 261,585$ 261,585$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 784,755$ Other 140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ 107 Grayson and Walnut Creeks Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant 140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ Unfunded -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 307,000$ 2,980,000$ 440,000$ 4,000,000$ 5 Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 546,000$ 106 DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ -$ 34,000$ 127 Galindo Creek Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ 440,000$ 213 Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,980,000$ -$ 2,980,000$ Totals 10,983,585$ 7,299,585$ 9,919,585$ 6,912,000$ 3,693,000$ 11,101,750$ 6,760,750$ 56,670,255$ DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 19 of 100 5. UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE PROJECTS Unprogrammed future projects are those that have been scoped, but not yet programmed for funding in the next 7 years. Those projects are expected to be included in future plans for implementation after 2028. Table 3 includes a list of future projects. Details of these projects are included in Appendix B. Table 3. Unprogrammed Future Projects 6. FUTURE UPDATES This CIP is intended to be updated every two years or as needed to provide a multi-year outlook on the District’s capital activities. The next update is expected to be published in two years. Funding Source ID Project Title Cost Flood Control Zone 3B 15,500,000$ 124 Pine Creek Reservoir Sediment Removal and Capacity Restoration 5,500,000$ 125 San Ramon Creek Sediment Removal near San Ramon Bypass 400,000$ 128 Green Valley Creek Improvements up to 1st Crossing of Diablo Road 7,300,000$ 129 Green Valley Creek Improvements Upstream of 2nd Crossing of Diablo Road 2,300,000$ Drainage Area 33A 200,000$ 120 DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement 200,000$ Drainage Area 48B 490,000$ 201 DA 48B Line A at Port Chicago Highway 490,000$ Drainage Area 55 255,000$ 205 Fitzuren Road Remainder Parcel 255,000$ Drainage Area 109 300,000$ 225 DA 109 - Kellogg Creek Project Development 300,000$ Unfunded 57,506,000$ 9 Wildcat / San Pablo Creeks Phase II 13,250,000$ 12 Pinole Creek Habitat Restoration (1135 Project)6,875,000$ 17 Sustainable Capacity Improvement at Rodeo Creek 11,315,000$ 23 Canada di Cierbo Habitat Improvement 3,500,000$ 26 Pinole Creek Capacity Assessment 350,000$ 117 DA 67 - Tice Creek Bypass 2,730,000$ 120 DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement 150,000$ 203 West Antioch Creek Improvements - L Street to 10th Street 5,466,000$ 204 West Antioch Creek Improvements at Highway 4 2,500,000$ 206 East Antioch Creek Marsh Restoration 11,370,000$ Total: 74,251,000$ DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 20 of 100 7. CREDITS Prepared By: Gus Amirzehni, PE Reviewed By: Paul Detjens, PE List of Appendices: Appendix A: Detailed Project Information Sheets Appendix B: Unprogrammed Future Projects Details DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 21 of 100 Appendix A Detailed Project Information DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 22 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Pablo Creek Silt Survey WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Perform focused topographic surveys at six predesignated cross section locations to determine the amount of sediment accumulation and to determine the need for channel desilting. Channel desilting, once determined to be needed, would be scoped under a separate CIP entity. PROJECT NEED:The current operations and maintenance manual produced by the Corps requires annual sediment surveys. These surveys are a method to determine channel capacity and are in lieu of a more comprehensive survey and hydraulic model. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond, North Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 6 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$40,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:1 Flood Control Zone 6A $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 September 2021 1 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 23 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Creek Silt Survey WORK ORDER:9705 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Perform focused topographic surveys at six predesignated cross section locations to determine the amount of sediment accumulation and to determine the need for channel desilting. Channel desilting, once determined to be needed, would be scoped under a separate CIP entity. PROJECT NEED:The current operations and maintenance manual produced by the Corps requires annual sediment surveys. These surveys are a method to determine channel capacity and are in lieu of a more comprehensive survey and hydraulic model. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):FC Zone 7, TBD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$40,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:3 Flood Control Zone 7 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 September 2021 2 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 24 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from the Wildcat Creek Sediment Basin and stockpile on adjacent storage site for later off haul. PROJECT NEED:The Wildcat Creek sediment basin is designed to trap sediment and prevent sediment accumulation in more sensitive areas downstream. If it is not periodically desilted, the basin becomes less effective and sediment escapes downstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 7, Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$900,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Basin was last desilted in 2010-2011. $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:5 Flood Control Zone 7 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $273,000 $0 $0 $273,000 $0 $0 September 2021 3 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 25 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 73 Drainage Plan Update - Richmond WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Update the Drainage Area 73 Drainage Plan to reflect community needs PROJECT NEED:Drainage Area 73 has an outdated plan, and it does not reflect current drainage needs. In collaboration with the City of Richmond and community stakeholders, this project will develop an updated drainage plan and a list of drainage projects to accommodate current drainage needs. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 73 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$50,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:10 Drainage Area 73 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 4 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 26 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement -- Phase I WORK ORDER:8101 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Phase 1 of the project is to finalize design and complete CEQA and permitting process to retrofit the existing fish ladder/sedimentation basin to meet CDFW fish passage criteria for anadromous fish species, and to provide a facility that is less likely to clog due to heavy sediment load and trash. Additionally, the proejct will include a modification to a channel control structure to reduce flood risk and a community outreach to raise awareness in the community. PROJECT NEED:The Lower Wildcat Creek Flood Control Channel includes a low flow channel and fish ladder. In 2000 recognizing design deficiencies in the ladder, a Section 1135 investigation was initiated by the ACOE Waterways Experiment Station which ultimately led in 2014 to a preliminary retro-fit design conducted by Northwest Hydraulics Consultants (NHC). This project will develop the final construction documents and 100% PS&E for the fish ladder and sediment basin modofications based on the preliminary design developed by NHC. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:North Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):California DWR USRP Grant TOTAL PROJECT COST:$784,775 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):N NOTE:Funding provided by the California Department of Water Resources, Urban Streams Restorration Program grant awarded in 2021. $261,585 $261,585 $261,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:27 Grants $261,585 $261,585 $261,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 5 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 27 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:In partnership with the City of Pleasant Hill, the project will identify, design and implement sub-regional drainage improvements in the Grayson / Murderer's Creeks subwatershed. Likely projects are capacity improvements at bridges, floodwalls along sections of creek, and collector storm drains to more efficiently deliver stormwater to the creek. PROJECT NEED:Downtown Pleasant Hill and Poet's Corner areas are identified on the FEMA maps as having moderate flood risk. Area flooded in 1997 and again in 2006. City desires a project to take residents out of the floodplain. Early indications from the Corps study were favorable, but project ultimately did not have a sufficient benefit / cost ratio, or federal funding. This local, smaller project is the result. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 46 funds + City of Pleasant Hill funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$1,188,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:DA46 plan amendment needed before implementation of this project. $0 $0 $0 $528,000 $660,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:106 Drainage Area 46 $0 $0 $0 $528,000 $626,000 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 September 2021 6 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 28 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson and Walnut Creeks Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant WORK ORDER:8348 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Raise levees along Grayson Creek along STA 8+00 to 39+00 LT and Walnut Creek along STA 137+62 to 185+35 to improve level of protection at CCCSD treatment plant. PROJECT NEED:Additional flood protection is desired at the CCCSD Treatment Plant from Grayson Creek and Walnut Creek. This is in addition to the 2007 project that increased flood protection to a 100-year design storm level. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Martinez area, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and CCCSD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,572,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $280,000 $292,000 $1,800,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:107 Flood Control Zone 3B $140,000 $146,000 $900,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Other $140,000 $146,000 $900,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 7 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 29 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson Creek Channel Fence Rehabilitation WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Repair Fences along Grayson Creek concrete channel as part of our Creek and Channel Safety Program PROJECT NEED:Existing fence posts are starting to rust and spalling concrete from the channel wall. This project would renovate existing fence posts and fence, rehabilitate the damaged concrete wall, and replace the failing fence with new material. This project would extend the useful life of the protective fenceline, as well as preventing further deterioration of the concrete wall as part of our Creek and Channel Safety Program. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:Public Safety PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$600,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:108 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 8 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 30 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson Creek Sediment Removal WORK ORDER:8334 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from Grayson creek between confluence with Walnut Creek to Chilpancingo Parkway (about 9,000 linear feet in selected areas) PROJECT NEED:Remove accumulated sediment to restore design flood capacity of the channel. Exact areas to be desilted will be determined with a pre-design topographic silt survey. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV & V AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill, Pacheco PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$3,025,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Portions of this area was last desilted in 2006. Effort shared with Walnut Creek desilt (#118) $75,000 $340,000 $640,000 $1,970,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:109 Flood Control Zone 3B $75,000 $340,000 $640,000 $1,970,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 9 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 31 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project WORK ORDER:8285 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Transform Lower Walnut Creek from an antiquated, difficult to maintain, legacy USACE facility into a sustainable, environmentally sensitive facility for the next 50 years. Project includes modification of project levees, acquisition of flowage easements and possible reconfiguration of the channel conveyance to better accommodate sediment and habitat. PROJECT NEED:The Lower Walnut Creek project incorporates a new way of approaching the traditional methods of operating and maintaining a flood control facility. This alternative approach moves away from the single purpose, flood protection USACE design, to a sustainable, environmentally sensitive plan that will restore appropriate floodplains and habitat in the area. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Martinez, Pacheco, Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and Regional, State and federal Grant Funds (TBD) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$41,630,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Signature District project. Prior and future year expenditures not shown. Existing grants received from CDFW and EPA. Anticipated future grants to cover unfunded. $9,565,000 $1,205,000 $1,124,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:110 Flood Control Zone 3B $230,000 $180,000 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grants $9,335,000 $1,025,000 $944,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 10 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 32 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 10 Facility Improvements WORK ORDER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct facility improvements along existing drainage lines in order to reduce local flooding risk. Line F improvement recommendations include installing 185 feet of 27-inch pipe and 530 feet of 24-inch pipe to existing drainage pipe to improve conveyance of stormwater from the community between Calmar Vista Road and Danville Boulevard. Line A improvement recommendations include installing retaining walls along 410 feet of earthen channel near Montair Elementary School to minimize bank failure. Line A and A-5 improvement recommendations include installing multiple low-level weirs along the 1,570 feet of earthen channel upstream ofthe retaining walls to capture silt before it can collect in downstream pipes. PROJECT NEED:Improvement recommendations are based on a review of the existing and propsoed DA facilities, several site visits, and input from the Town of Danville to improve drainage conditions in the area. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 10 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $40,000 $860,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:115 Drainage Area 10 $0 $40,000 $860,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 11 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 33 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Walnut Creek Sediment Removal - Clayton Valley Drain to Drop Structure 1 WORK ORDER:8334 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from upland benches in Walnut Creek to restore channel capacity and restore wetlands PROJECT NEED:Remove accumulated sediment to restore design flood capacity of the channel. Exact areas to be desilted will be determined with a pre-design topographic silt survey. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord, Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$8,000,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Effort shared with Grayson desilt (#109) $100,000 $4,400,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:118 Flood Control Zone 3B $100,000 $4,400,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 12 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 34 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Kubicek Basin Sediment Removal WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove sediment and restore habitat to ensure basin continues to function as designed PROJECT NEED:The Pine Creek Detention Basin -- now known as the Kubicek Basin -- was designed for sediment storage. This sediment needs to be periodically removed to ensure proper functioning of the basin. Sediment has not been removed since the basin was constructed in the 1970s. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$50,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Prior year expenditures not shown. $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:121 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 13 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 35 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pine Creek Dam Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:8346 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam and recommend retrofit improvements. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:This project would identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $190,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:122 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $190,000 $0 $0 September 2021 14 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 36 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Galindo Creek Improvements WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Participate with City of Concord and USACE to construct a stormwater detention basin on Galindo Creek upstream of Ygnacio Valley Road (CSU East Bay Campus). Basin will be created with a modification to the existing headwall. PROJECT NEED:This project would reduce flood risk to properties in the floodplain between Ygnacio Valley and the start of the concrete channel portion of Galindo Creek in the City of Concord. USACE and Concord have completed a federal reconnaissance study. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and the City of Concord TOTAL PROJECT COST:$500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Assume Concord will be the lead agency for CEQA/permits. Expect larger total project with additional funding by other partners. $500k is max FC Zone 3B contribution. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $480,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:127 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $40,000 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $440,000 September 2021 15 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 37 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Flood Control Zone 3B Channels and Structures Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:8353 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV & V AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Concord, and unincorporated. PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$915,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:130 Flood Control Zone 3B $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 16 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 38 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 13 Line F-1 Storm Drainage in Alamo WORK ORDER:8303 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a drainage line that will connect with the existing drainage network and reduce local flooding issues. The newly created drainage line (Line F-1) will consist of a 30-inch pipe that will run parallel to the Iron Horse Trail Corridor from existing line “F” at Las Trampas Road (1300 ft.), to the intersection of South Avenue. From this point the pipe will extend another 150 ft. to the southwest, to the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court (Fig.1). Drainage inlet structures will be placed every 250 feet (as per the County criteria) including: 6 inlets on the Iron Horse Trail, 1 manhole on Las Trampas Road, and 2 inlets in the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court. PROJECT NEED:To address recurring flooding complications at locations along South Avenue; the intersection of South Avenue and Wayland Lane, and the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Alamo PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 13 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$750,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $300,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:139 Drainage Area 13 $0 $0 $300,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 17 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 39 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Trembath Detention Basin WORK ORDER:8532 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct Trembath Detention Basin. Trembath Basin is a new facility. Trembath Basin will be regulated by State Division of Dam Safety. PROJECT NEED:This project is needed to provide flood protection in the lower watershed of East Antioch Creek in accordance with the adopted Drainage Area 56 (DA 56) plan. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 56 (Org 7566) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$12,550,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Prior and future year expenditures not shown. $200,000 $200,000 $1,050,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:207 Drainage Area 56 $200,000 $200,000 $1,050,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 18 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 40 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Develop Revenue Generating Sites at Lindsey Basin WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Prepare conceptual plans and a cost estimate for the development of the two District-owned remainder parcels near the Lindsey Basin. Market the parcels to generate maximum long-term revenue for the Drainage Area and / or the District. PROJECT NEED:The Lindsey Detention Basin was designed for future re-use of spoil disposal sites as revenue-generating development. This project will facilitate this long-planned development. Project timing is a rough estimate; actual development depends on the commercial real estate market. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area funds (Org,7566) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$593,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Future year expenditures not shown. $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 $99,000 $102,000 $102,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:209 Drainage Area 56 $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 $99,000 $102,000 $102,000 September 2021 19 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 41 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:8355 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam and recommend retrofit improvements, if needed. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$330,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $130,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:210 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $130,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 20 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 42 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Dry Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam embankments and recommend retrofit improvements, if needed. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$360,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $210,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:211 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $210,000 September 2021 21 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 43 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration WORK ORDER:8495 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Assess reservoir condition and habitat condition of impoundment area. Develop restoration plan that: maintains or improves level of flood protection, improves surrounding habitat, is compatible with surrounding state park uses, deals appropriately with accumulated mercury and accommodates mercury that will arrive at the basin in the next 50 years. After proper approvals and CEQA analysis, implement the preferred alternative. PROJECT NEED:Marsh Creek Reservoir was constructed in 1964 as a single-purpose facility and has reduced flood risks. Now nearing a half-century of use, the reservoir has poor water quality (impacted by mercury). With the opening of the state park on surrounding lands, there is an increased pressure to allow public access. A comprehensive restoration plan is needed to guide operations of this facility and development of future projects for the next 50 years. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1, future grant funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$5,400,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):Yes NOTE:Plan implementation may be delayed depending on other priorities for FC Zone 1 funds, (Future year expenditures not shown.) $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $468,000 $4,480,000 $210,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:213 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $468,000 $1,500,000 $210,000 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,980,000 $0 September 2021 22 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 44 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Supplemental Capacity WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Raise channel banks, levees and construct floodwalls to improve flood protection PROJECT NEED:A 2010 District study identified the need for additional channel capacity upon ultimate development of the watershed. This project is needed to ensure 100-year storms are contained in the channel without overtopping and flooding adjacent neighborhoods. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1, Drainage Area 130, future grant funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$3,664,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:See the 2010 study on file to contain 100-year flood flows and contain 50-year flood flows with freeboard. (Future year expenditures not shown.) $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $77,000 $578,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:215 Drainage Area 130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $77,000 $578,000 September 2021 23 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 45 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion WORK ORDER:8447 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Excavate the storage area of the existing Deer Creek Reservoir to increase stormwater holding capacity and reduce flood flows downstream PROJECT NEED:This project would increase storage capacity of Deer Creek Reservoir to protect downstream properties from flooding. Work to date has established that it is more beneficial to expand the future storage volume behind the existing dam by selectively excavating the storage area rather than raising the dam. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$6,230,600 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $22,000 $11,000 $66,000 $88,000 $894,000 $5,143,000 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:217 Drainage Area 130 $22,000 $11,000 $66,000 $88,000 $894,000 $5,143,000 $0 September 2021 24 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 46 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion - R/W Acquisition WORK ORDER:8463 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Acquire additional land rights over area currently encumbered only by a flowage easement. This is needed for expansion of the storage area of the Deer Creek Reservoir, located south of Balfour Road in Brentwood. PROJECT NEED:Need to retain additional stormwater in Deer Creek Reservoir to protect downstream properties. Instead of raising the dam, the plan is to expand the storage volume behind the existing dam by selectively excavating the storage area. The existing flowage easement is insufficient to do so; need to upgrade flowage easement into a drainage easement. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$214,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):N/A NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $149,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:218 Drainage Area 130 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $149,000 $0 $0 September 2021 25 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 47 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Upper Sand Creek Basin Surplus Material WORK ORDER:8517 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Coordinate removal of Upper Sand Creek Basin material by others, separate from main USCB contract. Includes material removed in advance of construction as well as material removed post construction. Common customers include contractors, developers and other agencies needing high quality fill material. PROJECT NEED:Brokering dirt removal in this way typically represents an excellent value (in cost/yd3) for the District. Interest in material (and thus cost) is highly dependent on the economy. Each cubic yard of material removed gets the basin incrementally closer to its ultimate volume at a reduced cost per cubic yard. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DA 130, FC Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$180,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Prior and future expenditures not shown. $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:220 Drainage Area 130 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 26 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 48 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Lower Sand Creek Basin Construction WORK ORDER:8492 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a 300 ac-ft regional detention basin on Sand Creek. The existing 40 ac-ft basin will be converted into an 300 ac-ft offline basin with new intake structure, primary and emergency spillways, low flow channel and riparian mitigation area. PROJECT NEED:In conjunction with the Upper Sand Creek Basin, this lower basin will reduce stormwater flows in Sand Creek and in Marsh Creek. With the upper basin in place, the 100 year 12 hour flow rate is 1230 cfs. Once completed, the lower basin will reduce this flow rate to 209 cfs, and provide improved flood protection for Brentwood and Oakley. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible future Federal, State and local grants, Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$7,414,500 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $20,000 $20,000 $61,000 $111,000 $882,000 $1,139,750 $5,180,750 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:222 Drainage Area 130 $20,000 $20,000 $61,000 $111,000 $882,000 $1,139,750 $5,180,750 September 2021 27 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 49 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Flood Control Zone 1 Facilities Condition Assessment WORK ORDER:8360 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:The Cities of Brentwood and Oakley PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$510,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:227 Flood Control Zone 1 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 28 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 50 of 100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Emergency Spillway Rehabilitation WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Improve performance of spillway by adding erosion control messure at concrete apron PROJECT NEED:To avoid toe erosion upon use of spill way SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$280,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N): NOTE: $0 $0 $20,000 $260,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:232 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $0 $20,000 $260,000 $0 $0 $0 September 2021 29 / 29DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 51 of 100 Appendix B Unprogrammed Future Projects Details DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 52 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat / San Pablo Creeks Phase II WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Channel improvements in Wildcat Creek and San Pablo Creek in the City of San Pablo upstream of BNSF railroad tracks PROJECT NEED:The previous Corps projects stopped at the BNSF railroad. Significant residual flood risk remains in the portions of San Pablo and Wildcat Creeks in the City of San Pablo upstream of the BNSF railroad. This project would consist of the coordination needed with the Corps for expansion of the system upstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:San Pablo PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):City of San Pablo, US Army Corps of Engineers TOTAL PROJECT COST:$13,250,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $13,250,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:9 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,250,000 September 2021 1 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 53 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pinole Creek Habitat Restoration (1135 Project) WORK ORDER:8493 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Improve riparian habitat throughout the limits of the previous Army Corps of Engineers project. Remove possible fish barriers and improve habitat while preserving and expanding flood conveyance. Work within the USACE 1135 Program to ensure federal participation in this project. PROJECT NEED:The Pinole Creek USACE project is dated and single purpose. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration has identified Pinole Creek as primary steelhead habitat in the west Contra Costa County. Habitat improvements are needed to ensure migrating steelhead pass successfully through the project area to habitat upstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Pinole PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):City of Pinole, USACE 1135 Program (75% - $5M limit) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$6,875,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $6,875,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:12 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,875,000 September 2021 2 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 54 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Sustainable Capacity Improvement at Rodeo Creek WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Rehabilitate or replace concrete-lined portion of creek to improve conveyance, restore habitat PROJECT NEED:Rodeo Creek is a 1960s era USACE channel, is devoid of most habitat, and is difficult to keep desilted, especially in the lowest reach. A new, more sustainable design of the creek is needed, and it has the potential to serve as a catalyst for further revitalization of the adjacent community. This project would also reduce long term dredging costs. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Rodeo PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$11,315,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $11,315,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:17 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,315,000 September 2021 3 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 55 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Canada di Cierbo Habitat Improvement WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Create a mitigation bank for County and District mitigation needs. Acquire right of way, develop restoration plan, implement plan and reap benefits. PROJECT NEED:Public projects often have unavoidable habitat impacts. Often, the remedy is to 'buy in' to a bank which is often located outside of the county. While this provides habitat mitigation, it does little to actually offset the impacts locally. The west part of CCC is underserved for this type of bank. Canada di Cierbo seeks to remedy this and provide quality, local mitigation and habitat improvement. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Crockett, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):TBD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$3,500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N): NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $3,500,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:23 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 September 2021 4 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 56 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pinole Creek Capacity Assessment WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Assess creek capacity and watershed conditions and develop alternatives for improving flood protection in the area. PROJECT NEED:Watershed conditions have changed significantly with land development projects decreasing flood protection in the area. This project is intended to study watershed and creek conditions and develop alternatives for improving flood protection levels. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Cities of Hercules and Pinole PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S): TOTAL PROJECT COST:$350,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Zone 9 (Pinole Creek) is significantly underfunded. Funding for this item is very uncertain. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $350,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:26 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 September 2021 5 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 57 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 67 - Tice Creek Bypass WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct 66-inch bypass pipe in Tice Valley Boulevard, Meadow Road and Lancaster to provide a bypass for storm flows in Tice Creek PROJECT NEED:The 2004 completion of the Rossmoor Detention Basin significantly reduced flood risk for this area providing approximately a 20-year level of protection from Tice Creek. This long-planned bypass pipe would provide additional conveyance while allowing Tice Creek to remain in it's natural state. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Grant funds, City of Walnut Creek funds, other funds TBD. TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,730,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,730,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:117 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,730,000 September 2021 6 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 58 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Replace an undersized 60-inch culvert under Concord Blvd with a 117-inch by 79-inch arch culvert PROJECT NEED:The existing culvert is undersized and stormwater backs up and inundates Concord Blvd. The replacement culvert will be able to pass a 25-year storm event, lessening the risk of flooding on Concord Blvd. This is a cooperative project with the City of Concord. Per the 5-24-2005 JEPA, DA 33A will contribute a maximum of 90% of available funds which is currently approximately $209k. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 33A funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$350,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $350,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:120 Drainage Area 33A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 September 2021 7 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 59 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pine Creek Reservoir Sediment Removal and Capacity Restoration WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment in Pine Creek Reservoir to restore design flood storage capacity. Create wetlands in new reservoir bottom as mitigation of impacts. Rehabilitate primary and emergency spillways to extend design life. PROJECT NEED:Another CIP project will first perform a functional assessment to verify continued need for reservoir. If found to still be needed, then this project will restore design functionality and extend the design life. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$5,500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Seismic evaluation is covered under a separate CIP entry because seismic work will likely be combined with other dams. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $5,500,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:124 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500,000 September 2021 8 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 60 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Ramon Creek Sediment Removal near San Ramon Bypass WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Desilt San Ramon Creek downstream of the San Ramon Bypass diversion structure in Alamo to the bypass channel at the San Ramon PP Corridor PROJECT NEED:The San Ramon Creek Bypass Channel has a complex series of weirs allowing both low flows and high flows to continue down San Ramon Creek. Flows between those extremes are bypassed through the bypass system. The grades in San Ramon Creek downstream of the low flow pipe outfall prevent those low flows from passing into San Ramon Creek. This project would allow base flows to remain in the natural channel. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:District IV PROGRAM TYPE:system Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$400,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $400,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:125 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 September 2021 9 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 61 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Green Valley Creek Improvements up to 1st Crossing of Diablo Road WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:The existing channel is incised and lacks the capacity to pass the 100-year flood event. The project is needed to lower the flood risk to the surrounding neighborhood. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$7,300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $7,300,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:128 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,300,000 September 2021 10 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 62 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Green Valley Creek Improvements Upstream of 2nd Crossing of Diablo Road WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Green Valley Creek at this location has erosion pressures and capacity issues. Past creek improvements stopped just downstream. This project will improve erosion and capacity conditions. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B & Town of Danville TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,300,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:129 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000 September 2021 11 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 63 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 48B Line A at Port Chicago Highway WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and Construct 595 LF of 84-inch storm drain crossing Port Chicago Highway near Skipper Drive. This is a portion of DA 48B, Line A. PROJECT NEED:The existing 60-inch pipe under Port Chicago Highway is undersized and in poor condition. Construction of the replacement 84-inch storm drain will extend the service life of the facility and reduce flood risk for the surrounding community. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Bay Point PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Contra Costa County Redevelopment, DA 48B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$490,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $490,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:201 Drainage Area 48B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000 September 2021 12 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 64 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:West Antioch Creek Improvements - L Street to 10th Street WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct channel improvements from the downstream end of "L" Street Crossing to the upstream end of the 10th Street culverts in conjunction with the City of Antioch PROJECT NEED:The current channel was constructed only to an interim capacity and currently does not contain a 100-year storm event. Bottlenecks include the UPRR arch culvert and the narrow channel through the fairgrounds. This project will need to be constructed prior to constructing the third 10-foot pipe under Highway 4. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, City of Antioch, Grants, developer funds (upon development of the fairgrounds) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$5,466,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Project needs to proceed before CIP#204. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $5,466,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:203 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,466,000 September 2021 13 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 65 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:West Antioch Creek Improvements at Highway 4 WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Complete the storm drain system between "L" Street and Fitzuren Road. Work includes a new headwall downstream of "L" Street, one 8' by 10' box culvert under "L" Street, a single 10' diameter storm drain up to and under Highway 4 to connect to the exiting 10' pipes just north of Fitzuren Road. This results in a complete, triple 10' storm drain system. PROJECT NEED:Caltrans / CCTA has constructed a second bore under the highway as part of freeway widening in 2015. This CIP project completes the third bore between Fitzuren Road and "L" Street, and should not be constructed until downstream improvements (W. Antioch Creek at 10th Street, and W. Antioch Creek 10th Street to "L" Street) are constructed. See project #203. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III & V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, City of Antioch, Grants TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Project should follow construction of project #203. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,500,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:204 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 September 2021 14 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 66 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Fitzuren Road Remainder Parcel WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Prepare conceptual plans and facilitate development of three District-owned parcels on Fitzuren Road. Market these parcels for a commercial use, such as a restaurant or neighborhood retail. PROJECT NEED:These parcels were purchased in the 1980s to allow the construction of three large storm drains to carry West Antioch Creek. They were purchased with the intent of developing the unused portion once the storm drains were installed. The storm drain was designed to maximize the unused portion of the parcels and thus maximize the revenue generating potential for the District and DA 55. This project will follow the construction of the final 10' storm drain through the parcel. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, Flood Control District TOTAL PROJECT COST:$255,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Project should follow construction of project #204. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $255,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:205 Drainage Area 55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $255,000 September 2021 15 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 67 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:East Antioch Creek Marsh Restoration WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct marsh and floodplain improvements on East Antioch Creek downstream of Cavallo Road. Includes marina outlet channel (or equivalent), hazardous material clean-up on affected portion of Hickmont site, and three new box culverts under Wilbur Avenue. PROJECT NEED:Provide flood protection in the lower watershed of East Antioch Creek in accordance with the adopted Drainage Area 56 (DA 56) plan SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 56 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$11,370,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):Yes NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $11,370,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:206 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,370,000 September 2021 16 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 68 of 100 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 109 - Kellogg Creek Project Development WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Re-analyze the Kellogg Creek (Drainage Area 109) Plan and develop projects for future implementation PROJECT NEED:The current DA 109 plan is conceptual, and while sufficient to collect funds for improvements, the plan lacks the detail to develop and prioritize projects in the watershed. This effort will re-study the DA 109 plan to define specific projects for implementation, rank those projects, and then begin implementation in priority order. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Town of Discovery Bay PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DA 109 Funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $300,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 ID:225 Drainage Area 109 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 September 2021 17 / 17DRAFTSeptember 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 69 of 100 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 6. Meeting Date:09/13/2021 Subject:Hazardous Materials Commission recommendations to the TWIC to address the potential impacts of Sea Level Rise Department:Health Services Referral No.: 5 Referral Name: Review projects, plans and legislative matters that may affect the health of the San Francisco Bay and Delta, including but not limited to conveyance, flood control, dredging, climate change, habitat conservation, governance, water storage... Presenter: Michael Kent, Executive Assistant to the Hazardous Materials Commission Contact: Michael Kent, (925)250-3227 Referral History: The Hazardous Materials Commission previously wrote a letter to the Board of Supervisors on January 26, 2017 encouraging them to take action in response to the recommendations of the Adapting to Rising Tides study that was completed for most of the Contra Costa County shoreline by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 2016. Subsequent to that report, another Adapting to Rising Tides study was completed by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 2019 for the Eastern-most shoreline area of the County not addressed in the first study. Also in 2019, a Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Study was completed for the Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs. These studies laid out potential health and environmental impacts from Sea Level Rise to Contra Costa County, and potential adaptation measures that could be taken to address these potential impacts. The Hazardous Materials Commission received a presentation on the Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Study completed for the Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs in 2019. This study was also presented to TWIC in December, 2020. In response to the findings of this study, the Hazardous Materials Commission wrote a letter to TWIC on February 26, 2021, encouraging them to take further action to address the potential impacts of Sea Level Rise. The Commission’s letter was discussed at the April 12, 2021, TWIC meeting. TWIC directed the Hazardous Materials Commission to return with next steps on how to proceed. Referral Update: On June 8, 2021, Supervisor Burgis and County Administrator Monica Nino wrote a letter to September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 70 of 100 On June 8, 2021, Supervisor Burgis and County Administrator Monica Nino wrote a letter to County Departmental Directors requesting them to work with the Hazardous Materials Commission in providing data and any preliminary reports related to sea level rise. Since that time, Michael Kent, Executive Assistant to the Hazardous Materials Commission, has interviewed staff in the Sheriff’s Office and the Public Works, Conservation and Development, and Health Departments about how they address sea level rise in their planning and policies. He has also interviewed staff in other agencies such as the Bay Conservation and Development Commission, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. Michael Kent gave an update to TWIC on the progress of the Hazardous Materials Commission efforts to respond to TWIC’s directions on August 9, 2021. The Hazardous Materials Commission met on August 26, 2021 and unanimously approved the recommendations contained in the attached letter to the members of TWIC. The Hazardous Materials Commission is also preparing to conduct a survey of businesses that handle hazardous materials that will potentially be impacted by sea level rise as to their planning and actions concerning sea level rise. The survey results will be shared with TWIC. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): ACCEPT the recommendations from the Hazardous Materials Commission to address the potential impacts of sea level rise, and DIRECT staff as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): Unknown. This would depend on the direction TWIC gives to County staff. Attachments Letter from HMC RE: Sea Level Rise Summary of Sea Level Rise Interviews with County Departments and Others September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 71 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 72 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 73 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 74 of 100 Summary of Sea Level Rise interviews with County Departments and others – 8/26/21 Department of Conservation and Development 1) John Cunningham, DCD, Transportation Planning • Based on updates from the process to rethink the Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program (CRIPP) not aware of any efforts to evaluate existing roads vulnerability to SLR. The CRIPP (link) is a programming document that details funding for capital road improvement projects within Unincorporated Contra Costa County. It is prepared by the Public Works Department and adopted by the Board of Supervisors every two years. • They use the Transportation Analysis Guidelines (TAG) to evaluate new housing and commercial applications for impacts on traffic, but nothing in there about SLR (TAG was subsequently amended to include a step to check for SLR issues) • Not aware of any efforts by Contra Costa Transportation Authority to address SLR relative to resilience/adaptation of existing and new infrastructure. 2) Aruna Bhat, Ruben Hernandez, DCD, Current Planning, CEQA and Permitting • DCD’s permit application process and CEQA require applicants to consider the impacts of flooding, but not specifically SLR. • However, they gave examples of a number of projects that did address the impacts of SLR in their EIR or permit application. Most consultants are aware of the need to do this. • Other agencies, such as BCDC, are given a chance to review draft EIRs, or are co-lead agencies, and can request that SLR be addressed. For example, BCDC did so with the EIR for the Lower Walnut Creek flood control project. 3) Will Nelson, DCD, Advanced Planning, General Plan • The updated County General Plan will include several policies and actions related to SLR. This plan should be adopted in early 2023. • State law requires the Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program (CRIPP) to be reviewed annually by the Planning Commission to ensure that projects planned for construction during the upcoming year are consist with the General Plan. Once the updated General Plan is adopted, CRIPP projects will be reviewed for consistency with goals, policies, and actions related to SLR. 4) Jody London, DCD, Sustainability Coordinator • The County is in the process of updating its Climate Action Plan. The update will address climate adaptation and resilience, including SLR, but it has not been completed yet. It should be done at the same time as the update to the General Plan. September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 75 of 100 • She sponsored a study by graduate students at the Goldman School at UC Berkeley that made recommendations about governance issues related to addressing the impacts of SLR. • She would like to ensure coordination/consistency in the future with work that may be done by the ongoing study "Delta Adapts" by the Delta Stewardship Council. SLR is part of their vulnerability assessment for the Delta. • She has developed a list of agencies at the local, state, and federal level that have permitting and/or decision authority. • The Department of Conservation and Development is requesting funds from Measure X, the recently approved sales tax, to support work on sea level rise, among other things. 5) Ryan Hernandez, Principal Planner, Contra Costa County Water Agency, Agency Manager • The County Water Agency utilizes the Federal and State Platforms, the Delta Water Platform, and specific resolutions, all adopted by the Board of Supervisors (Board), to represent and advocate the County’s interests. The Delta Water Platform was last updated and approved by the Board in 2014. Focuses on the Delta but can address polices and plans impacting the entire shoreline. It needs to be updated. • The Water Agency prepares written comments on projects, studies and plans that may affect the Delta and County. State entities, including but not limited to, the Delta Stewardship Council, Delta Protection Commission, Delta Conservancy and the State Water Resources Board. • The Delta Water Platform doesn’t address SLR, but the update will, along with addressing other climate change issues. • The Water Agency is also preparing, in cooperation with others, the East Contra Costa Groundwater Sustainability Plan (ECC GSP), for submission to the State. This is a new State requirement pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and has never been done before. Two other areas of the County also have groundwater basins that require groundwater sustainability plans, Richmond (East Bay Plain) and Livermore Valley, with other lead agencies. • The ECC GSP considers and incorporates SLR into the future water budget modeling scenarios, using the State Department of Water Resources guidance. More information can be found in Chapter 5 of the ECC GSP. Related but slightly different, existing conditions show no signs of sea water intrusion in the groundwater basin because it is full, but the ECC GSP proposes a monitoring network to ensure the basin is managed sustainably. Public Works Department 6) Paul Detjens, Senior Civil Engineer, Public Works Flood Control District • Could use Restoration Authority money to address “Pinch Points” in Commodity Flow study • All permitting projects involving hazardous materials could take advantage of the Bay Restoration Regulatory Integration team to streamline permits, they address SLR in their process • Could use SLR resilience as a criteria to rank projects for funding in the Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program. • Make sure all resiliency projects are in the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan so that they can be eligible for FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program. September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 76 of 100 • Make sure SLR is considered in the Facilities Improvement Plan • He was aware of several non-county efforts that solicited stakeholder opinion about SRL – San Francisco Estuary Project did a North Richmond Visioning exercise, the North Richmond Resilient by Design project solicited community input, and the Department of Water Resources sponsored a local effort that solicited community input by the Watershed project in West County and the Resource Conservation District in East County. 7) Ramesh Kanzaria, Public Works, Capital Projects, Division Manager • Oversee 80 – 90 projects per year of all size, including hazmat remediation • Many of their projects are subject to CEQA • Looking at potential impacts of SLR on their projects is not an official part of their internal process, but gave example of County new admin building where this was talked about and mitigations were put in place that addressed SLR as a co-benefit. • They haven’t done any analysis of the potential impact of SLR on existing County-owned buildings and other structures (ie parking lots) 8) Jerry Fahy, Public Works, Division Manager for Transportation Engineering and Nancy Wein, Senior Civil Engineer, Transportation Engineering. • County manages about 660 miles of County Roads. • The Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program (CRIPP) is a list of funded projects ready to be built. Most are improvements to existing roadways, very few new roads. • Currently don’t have a written policy to look at the impacts of SLR on existing road infrastructure or when scoping new projects. • Would be difficult to change existing road infrastructure to address the impacts of SLR due to the impacts on surrounding infrastructure. • Would need to look at this issue in the scoping of projects Health Services Department 9) Dave Runt, Chief Operating Officer, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center • Have not addressed SLR in their planning efforts but is interested in doing so. 10) Geniffer Mountain, Facilities Manager, Contra Costa Health Services • Is not aware of any analysis that has been done of the impacts of SLR on Health Department facilities or operations. 11) Gerald Tamayo, Public Health Emergency Planning September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 77 of 100 • Has not addressed SLR in his program. They would work with the Office of Emergency Services during a flooding event to aid vulnerable populations. • Participated in drill a few years ago that focused on evacuation strategies during a flooding event. Office of the Sheriff 12) Meredith Gerhardt, Office of Emergency Services, Senior Emergency Planning Coordinator (via e-mail) • The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) was updated in 2018 and is updated every 5 years. • Funding to update the LHMP was recently approved and OES is expecting to put out the RFP to vendors by the end of the year. This means they will select a vendor and start meeting the first quarter of 2022. • OES has been providing input to DCD for the update to the General Plan. • OES is currently working on revisions to the County Emergency Operations Plan, which addresses all hazards that may affect the County, including sea level rise. Other Agencies 1) Dana Brechwald, Bay Conservation and Development Commission, Adapting to Rising Tides Program Manager • Developing Joint Platform for Regional SLR adaptation w/ Advisory Board of 30 • Regional framework for local implementation • 2 public workshops in August, adoption in September, transition to implementation after • Main Questions – who leads, how to fund, how to use existing structures to avoid silos • MTC is looking at funding plan, developing funding paper and survey • Developing a funding roadmap, due to be completed this fall 2) Matt Kelly, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Senior Transportation Planner • They really haven’t done any independent planning for sea-level rise to-date, but did reference it as a challenge for maintaining the system in their 2017 County-wide Transportation Plan (CTP). • Their upcoming CTP update will include updating the subregional Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and they have added a new non-modal topic of climate change. So the Plans would have to look at impacts that cause, or will be affected by SLR. That is the opportunity to address SLR by developing supportive mitigations for affected facilities in the Action Plans September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 78 of 100 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 7. Meeting Date:09/13/2021 Subject:CONSIDER report: Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Issues: Legislation, Studies, Miscellaneous Updates, take ACTION as Appropriate Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: 1 Referral Name: REVIEW legislative matters on transportation, water, and infrastructure. Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)655-2915 Referral History: This is a standing item on the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee referral list and meeting agenda. Referral Update: In developing transportation related issues and proposals to bring forward for consideration by TWIC, staff receives input from the Board of Supervisors (BOS), references the County's adopted Legislative Platforms, coordinates with our legislative advocates, partner agencies and organizations, and consults with the Committee itself. This report includes four sections, 1: LOCAL, 2: REGIONAL, 3: STATE, and 4: FEDERAL . 1. LOCAL No report in September. 2. REGIONAL No report in September. 3. STATE An update from state transportation legislative advocate is attached to this report, Mr. Watts will be in attendance at the September TWIC meeting. 4. FEDERAL September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 79 of 100 4. FEDERAL No report in September. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER report on Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): There is no fiscal impact. Attachments TWIC Legislative Update - Sacramento Legislation Tracking September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 80 of 100 Smith, Watts & Company, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations September 8, 2021 TO: Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Mark Watts SUBJECT: Sacramento Report – September TWIC Meeting The Legislature returned from the annual Summer Recess and resumed session work on Monday, August 16th. This report summarizes the present state of somewhat contentious transportation negotiations surrounding the recently enacted state budget and also provides a reminder of the Transportation Secretary’s new clean transportation initiative and expected activities that are likely to be addressed during last four weeks of the 2021 Legislative year which is scheduled to conclude on Friday September 10th. As reported previously, when Governor Newsom released the May Revise, he proposed to fund a massive economic recovery leaning on the substantial increase in state General Fund Revenue. This year’s May Revise budget proposal includes a historic investment of $100 billion in new economic stimulus ‐ "California Comeback Plan" ‐ bolstered by the state's improved state budget revenues. Transportation Element. The California Comeback Plan proposed the following new investments in transportation, totaling $11 billion: Zero‐Emission Buses and Trucks ‐ $1.4 billion to demonstrate and purchase or lease "green" buses and trucks. (Funding Source: $1.3 billion ‐ General Fund, $87 billion ‐ Air Pollution Control Fund) Priority Transit and Rail Projects ‐ $1 billion for transit and rail projects statewide that improve rail and transit connectivity between state and regional/local services. (Funding Source: $1 billion ‐ General Fund) Zero‐Emission Rail and Transit Equipment Purchase and Infrastructure ‐ $407 million to demonstrate and purchase or lease state‐of‐the‐art clean bus and rail equipment and infrastructure that eliminate fossil fuel emissions and intercity rail and intercity bus frequencies. (Funding Source: $100 million ‐ General Fund, $280 million ‐ Public Transportation Account, and $27 million ‐ federal funds) Los Angeles Olympics ‐ $1 billion to deliver critical projects in time for the 2028 Olympic Games. (Funding Source: $1 billion ‐ General Fund) September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 81 of 100 Smith, Watts & Company, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations High Priority Grade Separations and Grade Crossing Improvements ‐ $500 million to support critical safety improvements throughout the state. (Funding Source: $500 million ‐ General Fund) High‐Speed Rail ‐ $4.2 billion to complete high‐speed rail construction in the Central Valley, advance work to launch service between Merced and Bakersfield, advance planning and project design for the entire project, and leverage potential federal funds. (Funding Source: $4.2 billion ‐ Proposition 1A) State Highway Rehabilitation and Local Roads and Bridges ‐ $2 billion to support the advancement of priority State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) projects, Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) projects, and local road and bridge investments. (Funding Source: $1.1 billion ‐ special funds, $968 million ‐ federal funds) Active Transportation ‐ $500 million to advance projects that increase the proportion of trips accomplished by walking and biking, increase the safety and mobility of non‐ motorized users, advance efforts to regional agencies to achieve GHG goals. (Funding Source: $500 million ‐ General Fund) Climate Adaptation ‐ $400 million for state transportation projects and local grants to begin to undertake the identified effort needed to ensure our transportation systems and infrastructure is safe from climate threat. Transportation Discussions Break down. Governor Newsom’s Administration sought a broad, holistic, adoption of these proposals for a total of $8 billion in transportation investments, including $4.2 in Prop 1A for High speed Rail along with nearly $4 billion in new General Fund spending for ATP, Climate Adaptation, and 3 appropriations that would supplement the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) competitive grant program. However, this massive new investment was not to be – On September 3, the state’s leaders announced that the discussions on how much funding would be available for High Speed Rail broke down and the leadership announced they would put over ALL of the new transportation General Fund spending for later action. This leaves a modest, “keep the lights on”, appropriation for the High Speed Rail Authority and its contractors, as well as withdrawal of $2.5 billion from the upcoming competitive TIRCP grant program about to commence this fall. Other programs caught up in the include Active Transportation (‐$500 million); Climate Adaptation grants ( ‐$400 million) September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 82 of 100 Smith, Watts & Company, LLC. Consulting and Governmental Relations Transit. The revised budget represented a significant turn‐around in revenue support for core transit programs. Initially, the Governor’s January Budget Proposal estimated the State Transit Assistance (STA) program would receive approximately $667 million in FY 2021‐22. The STA program is now projected to see revenues of approximately $786 million, an increase of about $119 million. Intercity and Commuter Rail would receive an estimated $259 million in FY 2021‐22 (an increase of approximately $45 million). Cap and Trade funding has Remained Stable. The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) is expected to provide $106 million, distributed to eligible transit operators using the STA formula. Lastly, the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) is expected to receive approximately $487 million in FY 2021‐22, as Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF) revenues also remain steady. Clean California Initiative. The Governor's budget proposes to help transportation agencies tackle homelessness and litter on public property through the new Clean California Initiative in which Caltrans will partner with local governments (including transit agencies) in a statewide beautification effort. The budget includes an appropriation commitment of $1.5 billion from the State General Fund for this purpose over three‐years for statewide litter and debris cleanup across the state, with expressed goals to beautify the state's transportation network, educate the public about the harms of litter, and create long‐lasting litter deterrents. This initiative is designed to rely on partnerships with local entities, with a focus on increasing resources dedicated to eliminating trash and implementing measures to reduce future litter. The initiative will also provide resources to beautify the state highways and local roads with regional art and other projects that will serve as community gateways. Infill Housing. Finally, the budget proposed $500 million in one‐time federal American Rescue Plan Act funds for the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) to provide additional planning and implementation grants to regional entities for infill housing developments, targeted towards the state's climate goals and reducing vehicle miles traveled. This funding would be available to transit agencies for advancing innovative transit projects. Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI). In July, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) released the final version of their Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure. The plan outlines steps that the state can implement to invest transportation funds for more effective mitigation against climate change. The plan also seeks to support public health, safety and equity. CAPTI builds on Executive Orders N‐19‐19 and N‐79‐20, which were signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2019 and 2020. CalSTA developed the draft CAPTI document after input from various state agencies and stakeholder groups. September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 83 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 84 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 85 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 86 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 87 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 88 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 89 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 90 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 91 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 92 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 93 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 94 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 95 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 96 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 97 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 98 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 99 of 100 September 13, 2021 TWIC Agenda Packet - Page 100 of 100