Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BOARD STANDING COMMITTEES - 11082018 - TWIC Agenda Pkt
TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE November 8, 2018 3:00 P.M. 651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Chair Supervisor Candace Andersen, Vice Chair Agenda Items: Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee 1.Introductions 2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes). 3. Administrative Items, if applicable. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development) 4. REVIEW record of meeting for October 8, 2018, Transportation, Water and infrastructure Committee Meeting. This record was prepared pursuant to the Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205 (d) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Any handouts or printed copies of testimony distributed at the meeting will be attached to this meeting record. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development). 5. CONSIDER proposed ban of polystyrene food and beverage containers. (Tim Jensen, Department of Public Works) 6. RECEIVE and consider public comments on the draft Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2017/2018 to 2023/2024 (Plan), ACCEPT the Plan, and RECOMMEND the Board of Supervisors, as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, adopt the Plan. (Gus Amirzehni, Department of Public Works) 7. CONSIDER report on Local, State, Regional, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development) 8. UPDATES on Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee referrals. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 1 of 124 8. UPDATES on Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee referrals. (John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development) 9.The next meeting is currently scheduled for Monday, December 10th, 9am. 10.Adjourn The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend TWIC meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of members of the TWIC less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at the County Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez during normal business hours. Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time. For Additional Information Contact: John Cunningham, Committee Staff Phone (925) 674-7833, Fax (925) 674-7250 john.cunningham@dcd.cccounty.us 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 2 of 124 Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in meetings of its Board of Supervisors and Committees. Following is a list of commonly used abbreviations that may appear in presentations and written materials at meetings of the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOB Area of Benefit BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BATA Bay Area Toll Authority BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BDCP Bay-Delta Conservation Plan BGO Better Government Ordinance (Contra Costa County) BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFS Cubic Feet per Second (of water) CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission DCC Delta Counties Coalition DCD Contra Costa County Dept. of Conservation & Development DPC Delta Protection Commission DSC Delta Stewardship Council DWR California Department of Water Resources EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District EIR Environmental Impact Report (a state requirement) EIS Environmental Impact Statement (a federal requirement) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HBRR Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation HOT High-Occupancy/Toll HOV High-Occupancy-Vehicle HSD Contra Costa County Health Services Department HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IPM Integrated Pest Management ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA/JEPA Joint (Exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LCC League of California Cities LTMS Long-Term Management Strategy MAC Municipal Advisory Council MAF Million Acre Feet (of water) MBE Minority Business Enterprise MOA Memorandum of Agreement MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Protection Act OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center PDA Priority Development Area PWD Contra Costa County Public Works Department RCRC Regional Council of Rural Counties RDA Redevelopment Agency or Area RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposals RFQ Request For Qualifications SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SR2S Safe Routes to Schools STIP State Transportation Improvement Program SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBE Women-Owned Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee WETA Water Emergency Transportation Authority WRDA Water Resources Development Act 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 3 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 3. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:Administrative Items, if applicable. Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: N/A Referral Name: N/A Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)674-7833 Referral History: This is an Administrative Item of the Committee. Referral Update: Staff will review any items related to the conduct of Committee business. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER Administrative items and Take ACTION as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): N/A Attachments No file(s) attached. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 4 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 4. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:REVIEW record of meeting for September 10, 2018, Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Meeting. Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: N/A Referral Name: N/A Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)674-7833 Referral History: County Ordinance (Better Government Ordinance 95-6, Article 25-205, [d]) requires that each County Body keep a record of its meetings. Though the record need not be verbatim, it must accurately reflect the agenda and the decisions made in the meeting. Referral Update: Any handouts or printed copies of testimony distributed at the meeting will be attached to this meeting record. Links to the agenda and minutes will be available at the TWI Committee web page: http://www.cccounty.us/4327/Transportation-Water-Infrastructure Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): Staff recommends approval of the attached Record of Action for the October 8, 2018, Committee Meeting with any necessary corrections. Fiscal Impact (if any): N/A Attachments TWIC-Oct_2018 Record 10-08-18 TWIC Sign-In Sheet 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 5 of 124 D R A F T TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE October 8, 2018 9:00 A.M. 651 Pine Street, Room 101, Martinez Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Chair Supervisor Candace Andersen, Vice Chair Agenda Items:Items may be taken out of order based on the business of the day and preference of the Committee Present: Karen Mitchoff, Chair Candace Andersen, Vice Chair 1.Introductions 2.Public comment on any item under the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on this agenda (speakers may be limited to three minutes). There was no public comment. 3.CONSIDER Administrative items and Take ACTION as appropriate. There were no administrative items. 4.Staff recommends approval of the attached Record of Action for the September 10, 2018, Committee Meeting with any necessary corrections. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the meeting record. 5.RECIEVE this status report on the street light service coordination effort between PG&E and the County Public Works Department and Cities for street light maintenance. The Committee ACCEPTED the report, APPROVED the LOU and directed staff to bring the letter to the Board of Supervisors (on consent) after review by County Counsel. 6.CONSIDER the MRP 2.0 Implementation Plan, PROVIDE direction to staff, and FORWARD the Implementation Plan to the full Board for consideration and approval. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the recommendations and directed staff to bring the item to the Board of Supervisors as a presentation item. 7.ACCEPT the Capital Road Improvement and Preservation Program (CRIPP) for fiscal year 2018/2019 to 2024/2025 and RECOMMEND the Board of Supervisors fix a public hearing for approval of the CRIPP. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the recommendations and DIRECTED staff to coordinate with each District office to determine what format (paper, digital) to provide the CRIPP in. 8.CONSIDER the proposed Caltrans Sustainable Communities Planning Grant for the Short-term Active 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 6 of 124 8.CONSIDER the proposed Caltrans Sustainable Communities Planning Grant for the Short-term Active Transportation Infrastructure Plan, REVISE as appropriate, forward to the full Board of Supervisors for approval, and/or DIRECT staff as appropriate. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the recommendation. 9.DISCUSS 2019 State and Federal Legislative Platform Development (TWIC Referrals Only), REVISE as appropriate, and RECOMMEND that the Board of Supervisors include the revisions in the County's final 2019 State and Federal Legislative Platforms. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the recommendation. 10.CONSIDER report on Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. The Committee RECEIVED the report. 11.RECEIVE the report on Mobility Matters Program(s), refer to the full Board of Supervisors, and/or DIRECT staff as appropriate. The Committee unanimously APPROVED the recommendation. 12.RECEIVE information and DIRECT staff as appropriate. The Committee RECEIVED communication, news, and other items of interest. 13.PLEASE NOTE DATE AND TIME IS EARLIER IN THE MONTH TO ACCOMMODATE THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY **The next meeting is currently scheduled for November 8, 2018, at 3:00 P.M.** 14.Adjourn The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend TWIC meetings. Contact the staff person listed below at least 72 hours before the meeting. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the County to a majority of members of the TWIC less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at the County Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez during normal business hours. Public comment may be submitted via electronic mail on agenda items at least one full work day prior to the published meeting time. For Additional Information Contact: John Cunningham, Committee Staff 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 7 of 124 For Additional Information Contact: Phone (925) 674-7833, Fax (925) 674-7250 john.cunningham@dcd.cccounty.us Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in meetings of its Board of Supervisors and Committees. Following is a list of commonly used abbreviations that may appear in presentations and written materials at meetings of the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOB Area of Benefit BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BATA Bay Area Toll Authority BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BDCP Bay-Delta Conservation Plan BGO Better Government Ordinance (Contra Costa County) BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFS Cubic Feet per Second (of water) CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission DCC Delta Counties Coalition DCD Contra Costa County Dept. of Conservation & Development DPC Delta Protection Commission DSC Delta Stewardship Council DWR California Department of Water Resources EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District EIR Environmental Impact Report (a state requirement) EIS Environmental Impact Statement (a federal requirement) EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HBRR Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation HOT High-Occupancy/Toll HOV High-Occupancy-Vehicle HSD Contra Costa County Health Services Department HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IPM Integrated Pest Management ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA/JEPA Joint (Exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LCC League of California Cities LTMS Long-Term Management Strategy MAC Municipal Advisory Council MAF Million Acre Feet (of water) MBE Minority Business Enterprise MOA Memorandum of Agreement MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Protection Act OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center PDA Priority Development Area PWD Contra Costa County Public Works Department RCRC Regional Council of Rural Counties RDA Redevelopment Agency or Area RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposals RFQ Request For Qualifications SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SR2S Safe Routes to Schools STIP State Transportation Improvement Program SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBE Women-Owned Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee WETA Water Emergency Transportation Authority WRDA Water Resources Development Act 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 8 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 9 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 5. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:CONSIDER proposed ban of polystyrene food and beverage containers. Submitted For: Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Department:Public Works Referral No.: 5 Referral Name: Review issues associated with the health of the San Francisco Bay and Delta, including water quality. Presenter: Tim Jensen, PWD Contact: Cece Sellgren (925)313-2296 Referral History: The Regional Water Quality Control Boards issue the County a stormwater permit on a five-year recurring cycle. The first permit was issued in 1993 and the current permit was issued in November 2015. The objective of the permit is to reduce pollutants in stormwater to improve stormwater quality, and increase stormwater infiltration into soils to improve watershed health. Trash is considered a pollutant and the stormwater permit includes ambitious trash reduction targets. To meet the trash reduction targets, the County prepared trash reduction plans that include a variety of control measures. One of the control measures to reduce trash is to ban polystyrene food and beverage containers, as polystyrene is light and easily blown into waterways where it tends to break down into smaller pieces that are difficult to remove from the environment. Referral Update: The new stormwater permit, referred to as the Municipal Regional Permit 2.0, follows the prior Municipal Regional Permit 1.0 issued at the end of 2009. The Committee has reviewed several issues related to the stormwater permit, and Board members have testified before the Regional Water Board several times describing the impacts their stormwater permit has on County operations and the County budget. Although the stormwater permit is a familiar topic to the Committee, this is the first time a proposed ban of polystyrene food and beverage containers has been before the Committee for consideration. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER a proposed ban of polystyrene food and beverage containers and the policy implications and objectives of a ban, PROVIDE staff with policy direction to develop a draft ordinance, and, if necessary, FORWARD the recommended policy direction to the full Board for consideration and concurrence. Fiscal Impact (if any): 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 10 of 124 The cost to develop a polystyrene ban is estimated to be $75,000. The annual cost to enforce a polystyrene ban is estimated to be $25,000 for Option One. Option Two will cost more than Option One to administer and enforce, how much more is hard to determine given the variety of possible permutations of Option Two and the additional research required depending on the permutation. [100% County Stormwater Utility Funds] Attachments Memo to TWIC 11-8-18 Exhibit 1 Provisions Exhibit 2 Communication Plan Exhibit 3 Handout Exhibit 4 Mailing 8-23-18 Exhibit 5 Mailing 10-15-18 Exhibit 6 CA Restaurant Assoc ltr Exhibit 7 Goudey-London email 10-10-18 Poly Ord Provisions - County 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 11 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 12 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 13 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 14 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 15 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 16 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 17 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 18 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 19 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 20 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 21 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 22 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 23 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 24 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 25 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 26 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 27 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 28 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 29 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 30 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 31 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 32 of 124 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 33 of 124 Option 1 (Note 3)Option 2 (Note 3)Ban Use of Polystyrene Food ContainersYesYesYesYesYesYes (Note 2)YesYesBan Sale of Polystyrene Food ContainersYesBan Sale of Ice Chests YesBan Sale of Packing PeanutsYesBan Sale of Packaging MaterialsYesBan City Depts, Vendors, From Using PolystyreneYesYesYesYesYesGrace Period to Comply 6 Months 6 Months6 Months 6 Months6 Months 6 MonthsCompostable Provision YesYesYes(Note 4)Returnable or Reuseable Foodware EncouragedYesYesYesRecyclable ProvisionYesYesYesYesYesInclude Service Providers (hospitals, care facilities)"Take Out Fee"YesYesExempt foods prepackaged outside CountyYesYesYesYesYesYesYesExempt raw meat and egg containersYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYear Adopted2015 2012 2011 2007 2010 1989Note 1: A "Yes" indicates it is included in the County ordinance. A provision with a blank indicates it is not included in the County ordinance.Note 2: The ban of polystyrene food and beverage containers applies only to County facilities.Note 3: Option 1 is recommended by staff. Option 2 includes additional items to consider, reflecting comments received on the proposed ban.Note 4: A possible "Yes" if the alternative material is limited to paper based, compostable products. Staff does not recommend this option.County Polystyrene Ban Ordinance Provisions within the Bay Area (November 2018)Ordinance Provision (Note 1)Alameda Santa Clara San Mateo San Francisco Marin SonomaContra Costa ProposalPrint Date: 11/6/2018File Path: G:\Conservation\TWIC\2018\11‐18 TWIC Mtg\Copy of Ordinance Provisions by County.xlsx11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 34 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 6. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan for Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Submitted For: Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Department:Public Works Referral No.: 7 Referral Name: Review issues associated with County flood control facilities. Presenter: Gus Amirzehni, PWD Contact: Gus Amirzehni (925)313-2128 Referral History: On September 10, 2018, staff presented the draft Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2017/2018 to 2023/2024 (Plan) to the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) and requested a public meeting after a six-week public comment period to be held at TWIC’s scheduled meeting in November. The Committee directed staff to schedule that item at the next meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration and approval. On September 18, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved the item and referred it back to the Committee to receive and consider public comments on the Plan at the November 8, 2018, TWIC meeting. Referral Update: The Plan is a programming document for the funding of capital projects within the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) within the next seven fiscal years. The Plan is prepared under the guidance of the District Expenditure Policy and is intended to inform the public and community stakeholders about flood control projects. The Plan is intended to be a living document updated every two years or as needed. As more information is gathered about each project, the District may determine that some projects will need further revisions in scope, cost and/or schedule. In such cases, the District will revise subsequent plans to reflect those changes. Adoption of the Plan by the Board of Supervisors does not automatically approve capital projects listed in the Plan. Capital projects are subject to separate public review, engineering feasibility analysis, environmental assessment, and final approval by the Board of Supervisors. During the public comment period, the Plan was shared with community stakeholders and interested parties. A copy of the Plan was also made available for public review at the District 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 35 of 124 Office and prominently featured on the District website. Staff also participated in the monthly Public Works meetings with Supervisors and their staff. The overall feedback for the Plan and the public review process has been positive. As of the time of writing this report, the following is a summary of comments received and staff’s responses. One comment from monthly meetings entailed sharing the Plan with the cities and towns within the County. Staff subsequently circulated the Plan to the City–County Engineers’ e-mail list. Another comment from a city resulted in adding an assessment project to the unfunded, unprogrammed list and correcting a mislabeled field in project summary sheets. Three other comments received did not pertain to the Plan and resulted in staff offering technical assistance related to localized flooding issues. Staff is requesting that TWIC receive, consider, and incorporate comments, if any, to the Plan, accept the Plan, and recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt the Plan. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): RECEIVE and consider public comments on the Plan, ACCEPT the Plan, and RECOMMEND the Board of Supervisors, as the governing board of the District, adopt the Plan. Fiscal Impact (if any): The Plan recommends 43 projects within the District with a total cost of approximately $54 million over a seven-year period. Approximately $31 million is planned to be directly funded through various flood control funds with no impact to other County funds, and $3 million is planned to come from other local, State, or federal grants. As projects are developed, additional State and federal grants will be sought to augment District funds. Attachments Capital Improvement Plan 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 36 of 124 Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan 2018 Update Fiscal Year 2017/2018 – 2023/2024 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT November 2018 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 37 of 124 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 1 B. FUNDING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES .............................................................................................. 2 C. REVENUE SOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 2 D. 2018 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN........................................................................ 4 E. UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE PROJECTS.................................................................................................. 9 F. FUTURE UPDATES ............................................................................................................................... 10 G. CREDITS ............................................................................................................................................... 10 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES: Figure 1: 7-Year CIP Location Map Table 1: 7-Year Flood Control CIP Overall Summary Table 2: 7-Year Flood Control CIP List Table 3: Unprogrammed Future Projects List APPENDICES: Appendix A: Detailed Project Information Appendix B: Unprogrammed Future Projects Details 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 38 of 124 2018 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Flood Control Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a programming document for the funding of capital flood control projects 1 within the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District). The District’s jurisdictional boundary covers the entire Contra Costa County and includes cities in addition to the unincorporated County communities. The District operates 79 miles of flood control channels, 29 dams and detention basins, and 47 drop structures throughout the County. These facilities are on 4,189 parcels covering over 1,500 acres, and provide the regional backbone of flood protection in Contra Costa County. The CIP is prepared in accordance with the District’s Expenditure Policy and presented to the Board of Supervisors for approval. This CIP is intended to be updated every two years and it provides a 7-year outlook on the District’s capital activities in support of the regional, long- range development and related flood control plans. It is recognized that local communities have direct interest in the regional flood control projects and that those projects can impact a wide range of stakeholders. Therefore, the District is committed to developing projects in an open, community-based planning process. Furthermore, development of consistent stormwater management strategies in the region requires close coordination between local governments, regulators, as well as developers and landowners. Those strategies include concepts for comprehensive watershed management and resilient and sustainable design integration. To the extent feasible, those concepts have been incorporated into the development of this CIP. It is the intention of the District to continue to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to coordinate the implementation of regional drainage improvements. Approval of this CIP by the Board of Supervisors does not automatically approve projects for implementation. Flood control projects typically require years of advance planning, coordination, and cooperation between various agencies and community stakeholders. This CIP is prepared as a programmatic, planning-level document that intends to guide the District to program and initiate preliminary engineering work on the identified projects. Each project must undergo its own individual feasibility analysis and environmental assessment. As such, scope and cost of each project is preliminary and may change after additional reviews. Some projects may later prove to be infeasible or not cost-effective and may be dropped from subsequent plans. 1 A capital project is a long-term capital investment that constructs, expands, renovates, or replaces a facility or facilities, often called infrastructure. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 39 of 124 B. FUNDING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES Over the years, the District’s revenues have been constrained by fiscally-restrictive, state-wide ballot measures, while the cost of operations and maintenance has increased significantly due to more stringent regulatory requirements and aging facilities. As a result, deferred maintenance has created over $24 million backlog of facility repair and restoration work throughout the District. In response to these challenges and increasing demand for more capital improvements, in 2005, the Board of Supervisors, as the governing Board of the District, established the Flood Control Expenditure Policy to provide overall fiscal programming direction and guidance to staff in developing the District’s capital improvement program. That Policy, generally, dictates that the District establish Capital Improvement Plans and give the highest priority to those projects that preserve the existing infrastructure and extend the useful life of a facility. C. REVENUE SOURCES Funds for flood control improvements are mainly derived from property tax assessments, development and special benefit fees, and federal and state grants. Property tax and fee assessments are typically collected through various Flood Control Zones, Drainage Areas, and Benefit Assessment Areas. These areas have been established throughout the District over the years. A map of established Drainage Areas and Drainage Zones is shown in Figure 1. The following provides a summary description of funding sources from those areas and other revenue sources: 1. Flood Control Zone Property Tax Assessments Flood Control Zones were established over entire watersheds to fund the design, construction, and maintenance of flood control and water conservation facilities in the watershed. Funding resources vary from Zone to Zone with some Zones having no operating funds. In most cases, funding is not sufficient to maintain existing improvements, construct additional drainage facilities needed to provide the desired level of flood protection, or restore flood control channels to sustainable natural systems2. There are 14 identified major watershed Flood Control Zones in the District. Ten Flood Control Zones have been formed, but only five generate tax revenue. 2. Drainage Area Fees Drainage Areas were formed, as subwatersheds of Flood Control Zones, to provide funding for the construction of drainage improvements needed to mitigate increased storm runoff resulting from development within the subwatershed area3. Drainage Areas typically do not provide funding for ongoing maintenance of the DA improvements. There are 180 Drainage 2 Funding discrepancy between Zones is mainly due to Proposition 13 which effectively fixed property tax rates and constrained the District’s ability to raise new revenues. 3 Drainage Areas are analogous to the “Areas of Benefits” or “AOB” that collect revenues and fund transportation projects. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 40 of 124 kjkjkjkj kjkjkj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkjkj kjkj kj kj kjkjkj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj {1}{3B} {2} {9} {7} {8} {12}{11}{6A} {8A} [6][5][3][1] [20] [19][18] [10] [139][138] [232] [219] [228] [227] [222][220] [218][217] [216] [215] [213] [212][211] [210][209][208] [207][202] [136] [134] [132] [130] [127] [123][122] [121] [118] [114] [113] [111][110] [109] [108] [107] [106] (108) (109) (55) (104) (56)(73) (107)(105)(46) (67) (9) (8) (10) (48B) (57) (106) (72) (13) (62) (128) (76) (30C) (52C) (89)(127)(87)(30A) (33A) (30B) (75A) (47) (22) (101A) (29H)(40A) (48C) (16) (44B) (88) (52A) (29C) (33C) (78) (37A) (29J) (48D) (29G) (19A) (52B) (15A) (29E)(52D) (33B) (37A) Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Legend kj Project Locations [ID #] Drainage Areas (DA#) Drainage Zones {DZ#} Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 7-Year CIP Location Map ¯ 0 63 Miles Figure 111-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 41 of 124 Areas identified in the District representing small watersheds or subwatersheds. Sixty-three of the Drainage Areas have been formed and have an adopted plan and a drainage fee ordinance. These are in areas where development has, is, or will be occurring. As such, revenues from these areas are dependent on the housing and land development economy. 3. Drainage Area Benefit Assessments Drainage Area Benefit Assessments (DABA) are funds that are typically used on operation, maintenance, and repair of storm drainage facilities in a defined drainage benefit assessment area. There are currently seven DABAs established in the District. 4. Drainage Area Tax Assessments Three of the 63 formed Drainage Areas receive a small portion of tax revenue in addition to, or instead of, developer fees. Drainage Area property tax revenue is typically spent on the design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of storm drainage facilities within the Drainage Area. 5. Federal and State Grants The District has been successful in seeking and obtaining various state and federal grants for many of its projects in the recent past and continues to pursue those sources actively for future projects. In general, federal and state grants are becoming more competitive and very limited for single-purpose, flood control projects. This is a change from past decades when state and federal grants provided a majority of the District’s capital funding. Most grants now provide assistance to projects that provide grant-specific environmental benefits. This is another incentive for the District to incorporate environmental components to its flood control projects in order to be competitive with state and federal grants. D. 2018 FLOOD CONTROL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN In accordance with its Expenditure Policy, the District sets priorities within three specific program categories in establishing its capital program. These priorities are then balanced with the available funding in given Flood Control Zones or Drainage Areas to ensure the most feasible project delivery. The program categories in order of priority are: 1. System Preservation 2. Public Safety 3. System Expansion Based on the Expenditure Policy framework, a total of 43 projects representing an investment of $53 million over seven years make up this plan’s recommended projects. Figure 1 shows the geographic location of the proposed projects. Table 1 below provides an overall summary of recommended projects by funding entity highlighting project locations by watershed/major creek. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 42 of 124 Table 1. 7-Year Flood Control Capital Improvement Overall Summary (By Fund Source/Creek) Funding Source/Creek FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-25 Totals Flood Control Zone 1 481,571$ 590,000$ 1,306,000$ 1,059,000$ 468,000$ 1,640,000$ 420,000$ 5,964,571$ Marsh*391,571$ 430,000$ 1,306,000$ 1,059,000$ 468,000$ 1,500,000$ 210,000$ -$ 5,364,571$ Dry -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 210,000$ -$ 350,000$ Deer 90,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Flood Control Zone 3B 770,000$ 1,158,000$ 7,818,000$ 5,585,000$ 305,000$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 15,696,000$ Grayson *160,000$ 271,000$ 2,760,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,791,000$ Walnut *215,000$ 417,000$ 4,775,000$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,846,500$ 10,207,000$ Pacheco *-$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Pine -$ -$ 143,000$ 110,000$ 230,000$ -$ -$ -$ 483,000$ Galindo -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ -$ 60,000$ San Ramon 20,000$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Various 375,000$ 400,000$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 915,000$ Flood Control Zone 6A - San Pablo -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 40,000$ Flood Control Zone 7 - Wildcat -$ 27,000$ -$ 20,000$ 27,000$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 94,000$ Drainage Area 10 -$ -$ 17,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,000$ Drainage Area 13 20,000$ 333,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 653,000$ Drainage Area 46 - Grayson/Murderer's *-$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ 1,154,000$ Drainage Area 55 - Antioch 827,000$ 280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,107,000$ Drainage Area 56 - Antioch 90,000$ 225,000$ 1,078,000$ 500,000$ 115,000$ 108,000$ 102,000$ 2,218,000$ Drainage Area 73 -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Drainage Area 75A 10,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Drainage Area 130 36,050$ 192,000$ 920,000$ 166,000$ 353,000$ 814,000$ 1,607,000$ 4,088,050$ Marsh *26,050$ 100,000$ 867,000$ -$ 11,000$ 77,000$ 578,000$ 55,000$ 1,659,050$ Deer -$ -$ 22,000$ 39,000$ 215,000$ 88,000$ 594,000$ 5,143,000$ 958,000$ Sand 10,000$ 92,000$ 31,000$ 127,000$ 127,000$ 649,000$ 435,000$ 76,000$ 1,471,000$ Drainage Area 910 -$ 26,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,000$ Drainage Area 1010A - Shadow -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Grants - Walnut *175,000$ 400,000$ 237,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,062,000$ Other - Grayson *140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ Unfunded 23,000$ 353,000$ 40,000$ 8,000,000$ 6,407,000$ 3,430,000$ 890,000$ 4,846,500$ 19,143,000$ Wildcat/San Pablo/Rodeo -$ 353,000$ 40,000$ -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 666,000$ Grayson/Murderer's *-$ -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ Walnut *-$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 500,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 4,846,500$ 9,400,000$ Pacheco *-$ -$ -$ -$ 5,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5,600,000$ Galindo -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ 440,000$ Marsh *-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,980,000$ -$ 2,980,000$ Kellog 23,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 23,000$ Totals 2,572,621$ 3,850,000$ 12,616,000$ 17,278,000$ 8,301,000$ 6,012,000$ 3,099,000$ 4,846,500$ 53,728,621$ * Projects with multiple funding sources11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 43 of 124 Each location shown in the list may have several projects in various phases of development and implementation. It must be noted that some of the recommended projects are partially unfunded. Approximately $31 million is planned to be funded through various flood control funds and $3 million is planned to come from other local, State, or federal grants. An additional $19 million will be needed to fully fund the projects. As projects are further developed, efforts will be made to seek additional resources. A more detailed list of all projects within each funding entity, including partially unfunded, is included in Table 2. As stated above, priorities set for each project are based on the framework outlined in the District’s Expenditure Policy. Approximately, 71% of planned capital expenditures will fund system preservation while 28% will support system expansion in support of flood risk reduction. The remaining 1% will improve public safety. Figure 2 below shows the breakdown of capital expenditures by program priority. Figure 2. 7-Year CIP Expenditure by priority Additionally, detailed information about each project is included in Appendix A. The information provided for each project includes project name, description, justification, cost estimate, funding source(s), program priority, and anticipated expenditure plan category. Each project is assigned a unique number. Projects with numbers from 1 to 99 are located in West County, 100 to 199 are in Central County and 200 and greater are in East County. Projects are presented in numerical order. Generally, all identified projects are led by the District; however, for the purpose of completeness, this CIP may include some projects that are co-funded by the District, but managed in partnership with other jurisdictions. It must be noted that in addition to capital projects, this CIP also includes several hydraulic, seismic, and condition assessment studies that support capital projects. System Preservation 71% Public Safety 1% System Expansion 28% 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 44 of 124 Table 2. 7-Year Flood Control Capital Improvement Project List (By Fund Source) Funding Source ID Project Title FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Totals Flood Control Zone 1 481,571$ 590,000$ 1,306,000$ 1,059,000$ 468,000$ 1,640,000$ 420,000$ 5,964,571$ 210 Marsh Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment [8355]-$ 130,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 290,000$ 211 Dry Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 210,000$ 350,000$ 212 Deer Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment [8355]90,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 213 Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration [8495]55,521$ -$ 129,000$ 109,000$ 468,000$ 1,500,000$ 210,000$ 2,471,521$ 216 Marsh Creek Widening Between Dainty Avenue and Sand Creek [8466]26,050$ 100,000$ 867,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 993,050$ 227 Marsh Creek and Sand Creek Structures Conditions Assessment [8360]310,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 510,000$ 232 Marsh Creek Reservoir Emergency Spillway Rehabilitation [TBD]-$ -$ 150,000$ 950,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ Flood Control Zone 3B 770,000$ 1,158,000$ 7,818,000$ 5,585,000$ 305,000$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 15,696,000$ 107 Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant [8348]140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ 108 Grayson Creek Channel Fence Rehabilitation [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 109 Grayson Creek Sediment Removal [8334]20,000$ 125,000$ 1,860,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,005,000$ 110 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project [8285]165,000$ 292,000$ 525,000$ 4,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5,682,000$ 111 Pacheco Marsh Restoration [8494]-$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 118 Walnut Creek Sediment Removal - Clayton Valley Drain to Drop Structure 1 [8334]50,000$ 125,000$ 4,250,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,525,000$ 121 Kubicek Basin Sediment Removal [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 122 Pine Creek Dam Seismic Assessment [8346]-$ -$ -$ 110,000$ 190,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 123 Pine Creek Reservoir Functional Assessment [WO TBD]-$ -$ 143,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 143,000$ 127 Galindo Creek Improvements [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 60,000$ 130 Flood Control Zone 3B Channels and Structures Conditions Assessment [8353]375,000$ 400,000$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 915,000$ 138 San Ramon Creek Watershed Study [8541]20,000$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Flood Control Zone 6A -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 1 San Pablo Creek Silt Survey -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ Flood Control Zone 7 -$ 27,000$ -$ 20,000$ 27,000$ -$ 20,000$ 94,000$ 3 Wildcat Creek Silt Survey -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 40,000$ 5 Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt -$ 27,000$ -$ -$ 27,000$ -$ -$ 54,000$ Drainage Area 10 -$ -$ 17,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,000$ 113 Update DA 10 for Danville Area -$ -$ 17,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,000$ Drainage Area 13 20,000$ 333,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 653,000$ 114 Update DA 13 Plan for Western Alamo -$ 33,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 33,000$ 139 DA 13 Line F-1 Storm Drainage in Alamo 20,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620,000$ Drainage Area 46 -$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ 1,154,000$ 106 DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements -$ -$ -$ 528,000$ 626,000$ -$ -$ 1,154,000$ Drainage Area 55 827,000$ 280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,107,000$ 202 West Antioch Creek - DA55 Culverts at 10th Street [8399]827,000$ 280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,107,000$ Drainage Area 56 90,000$ 225,000$ 1,078,000$ 500,000$ 115,000$ 108,000$ 102,000$ 2,218,000$ 207 Trembath Detention Basin [8532]90,000$ 225,000$ 1,050,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,815,000$ 208 Lindsey Basin Finalization Tasks & R/W Transfer [8126]-$ -$ 11,000$ 33,000$ 16,000$ 6,000$ -$ 66,000$ 209 Develop Revenue Generating Sites at Lindsey Basin [WO TBD]-$ -$ 17,000$ 17,000$ 99,000$ 102,000$ 102,000$ 337,000$ Drainage Area 73 -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 10 DA 73 Drainage Plan Update - Richmond [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Drainage Area 75A 10,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 132 Canyon Lakes Facilities Conditions Assessment [8361]10,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Drainage Area 130 36,050$ 192,000$ 920,000$ 166,000$ 353,000$ 814,000$ 1,607,000$ 4,088,050$ 215 Marsh Creek Supplemental Capacity [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ 11,000$ 77,000$ 578,000$ 666,000$ 216 Marsh Creek Widening Between Dainty Avenue and Sand Creek [8466]26,050$ 100,000$ 867,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 993,050$ 217 Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion [8447]-$ -$ 22,000$ 11,000$ 66,000$ 88,000$ 594,000$ 781,000$ 218 Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion - R/W Acquisition [8463]-$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 149,000$ -$ -$ 177,000$ 220 Upper Sand Creek Basin Surplus Material [8517]10,000$ 72,000$ 11,000$ 66,000$ 11,000$ 66,000$ 11,000$ 247,000$ 222 Lower Sand Creek Basin Construction [8492]-$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 61,000$ 116,000$ 583,000$ 424,000$ 1,224,000$ Drainage Area 910 -$ 26,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,000$ 134 Rassier Ranch Basin Conditions Assessment [8362]-$ 26,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,000$ 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 45 of 124 Funding Source ID Project Title FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Totals Drainage Area 1010A -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ 136 Shadow Creek Basin Conditions Assessment [WO TBD]-$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ Grants 175,000$ 400,000$ 237,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,062,000$ 110 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project [8285]175,000$ 400,000$ 237,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2,062,000$ Other 140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ 107 Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant [8348]140,000$ 146,000$ 900,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,286,000$ Unfunded 23,000$ 353,000$ 40,000$ 8,000,000$ 6,407,000$ 3,430,000$ 890,000$ 19,143,000$ 5 Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt [WO TBD]-$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 273,000$ -$ -$ 546,000$ 18 San Pablo Conditions Assessment [WO TBD]-$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 19 Wildcat Conditions Assessment [WO TBD]-$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 20 Rodeo Conditions Assessment [WO TBD]-$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 106 DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements [TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ 34,000$ -$ -$ 34,000$ 110 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project [8285]-$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 500,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 9,400,000$ 111 Pacheco Marsh Restoration [8494]-$ -$ -$ -$ 5,600,000$ -$ -$ 5,600,000$ 127 Galindo Creek Improvements [WO TBD]-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ 440,000$ 213 Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration [8495]-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,980,000$ -$ 2,980,000$ 228 Kellog Conditions Assessment [WO TBD]23,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 23,000$ Totals 2,572,621$ 3,850,000$ 12,616,000$ 17,278,000$ 8,301,000$ 6,012,000$ 3,099,000$ 53,728,621$ 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 46 of 124 E. UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE PROJECTS Unprogrammed future projects are those that have been scoped, but not yet programmed for funding in the next 7 years. Those projects are expected to be included in future plans for implementation after 2024. Table 3 includes a list of future projects. Details of these projects are included in Appendix B. Table 3. Unprogrammed Future Projects Funding Source ID Project Title FY 2024- Flood Control Zone 3B 13,767,000$ 124 Pine Creek Reservoir Sediment Removal and Capacity Restoration [WO TBD]5,000,000$ 125 San Ramon Creek Sediment Removal near San Ramon Bypass [WO TBD]363,000$ 128 Green Valley Creek Improvements up to 1st Crossing of Diablo Road [WO TBD]6,600,000$ 129 Green Valley Creek Improvements Upstream of 2nd Crossing of Diablo Road [WO TBD]1,804,000$ Drainage Area 33A 209,779$ 120 DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement [WO TBD]209,779$ Drainage Area 48B 429,000$ 201 DA 48B Line A at Port Chicago Highway 429,000$ Drainage Area 55 215,000$ 205 Fitzuren Road Remainder Parcel 215,000$ Drainage Area 109 270,000$ 225 DA 109 - Kellogg Creek Project Development 270,000$ Unfunded 51,139,221$ 7 Wildcat Creek Habitat Improvements (USACE 1135 Program) [8619]2,000,000$ 9 Wildcat / San Pablo Creeks Phase II [WO TBD]12,045,000$ 12 Pinole Creek Habitat Restoration (1135 Project) [8493]6,250,000$ 17 Sustainable Capacity Improvement at Rodeo Creek [WO TBD]10,285,000$ 23 Canada di Cierbo Habitat Improvement [WO TBD]3,000,000$ 26 Pinole Creek Capacity Assessment 300,000$ 117 DA 67 - Tice Creek Bypass [WO TBD]2,481,000$ 120 DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement [WO TBD]87,221$ 203 West Antioch Creek Improvements - L Street to 10th Street [WO TBD]4,906,000$ 204 West Antioch Creek Improvements at Highway 4 [WO TBD]2,200,000$ 206 East Antioch Creek Marsh Restoration [WO TBD]7,585,000$ Totals 66,030,000$ 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 47 of 124 F. FUTURE UPDATES As staff develops and implements these capital projects, future CIP updates will include information on the progress and delivery of the listed projects. Additionally, efforts on the identification of funding shortfalls and additional funding sources to support the District’s capital needs are underway. The 2013 Report on the Status of Flood Protection Infrastructure and its 2017 update provided some information about those efforts. Additional detailed information will be reported in future updates. G. CREDITS Prepared By: Gus Amirzehni, PE Reviewed By: Paul Detjens, PE List of Appendices: Appendix A Detailed Project Information Sheets Appendix B Unprogrammed Future Projects Details 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 48 of 124 Appendix A Detailed Project Information 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 49 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Pablo Creek Silt Survey WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Perform focused topographic surveys at six predesignated cross section locations to determine the amount of sediment accumulation and to determine the need for channel desilting. Channel desilting, once determined to be needed, would be scoped under a separate CIP entity. PROJECT NEED:The current operations and maintenance manual produced by the Corps requires annual sediment surveys. These surveys are a method to determine channel capacity and are in lieu of a more comprehensive survey and hydraulic model. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond, North Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 6 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$40,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:1 Flood Control Zone 6A $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 November 2018 1 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 50 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Creek Silt Survey WORK ORDER:9705 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Perform focused topographic surveys at six predesignated cross section locations to determine the amount of sediment accumulation and to determine the need for channel desilting. Channel desilting, once determined to be needed, would be scoped under a separate CIP entity. PROJECT NEED:The current operations and maintenance manual produced by the Corps requires annual sediment surveys. These surveys are a method to determine channel capacity and are in lieu of a more comprehensive survey and hydraulic model. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):FC Zone 7, TBD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$40,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:3 Flood Control Zone 7 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 November 2018 2 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 51 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Sediment Basin Desilt WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from the Wildcat Creek Sediment Basin and stockpile on adjacent storage site for later off haul. PROJECT NEED:The Wildcat Creek sediment basin is designed to trap sediment and prevent sediment accumulation in more sensitive areas downstream. If it is not periodically desilted, the basin becomes less effective and sediment escapes downstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 7, Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$900,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Basin was last desilted in 2010-2011. $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:5 Flood Control Zone 7 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $273,000 $0 $0 $273,000 $0 $0 November 2018 3 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 52 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 73 Drainage Plan Update - Richmond WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Update the Drainage Area 73 Drainage Plan to reflect community needs PROJECT NEED:Drainage Area 73 has an outdated plan, and it does not reflect current drainage needs. In collaboration with the City of Richmond and community stakeholders, this project will develop an updated drainage plan and a list of drainage projects to accommodate current drainage needs. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 73 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$50,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:10 Drainage Area 73 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 4 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 53 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Pablo Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Community of North Richmond and San Pablo PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$20,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):No NOTE: $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:18 Unfunded $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 5 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 54 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond, E. Richmond Heights, San Pablo, and Community of N. Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control District Fund 7505 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$20,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:19 Unfunded $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 6 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 55 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Rodeo Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:The unincorporated community of Rodeo PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$125,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Prior year expenditures not shown. $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:20 Unfunded $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 7 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 56 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA46 Grayson and Murderer's Creek Subregional Improvements WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:In partnership with the City of Pleasant Hill, the project will identify, design and implement sub-regional drainage improvements in the Grayson / Murderer's Creeks subwatershed. Likely projects are capacity improvements at bridges, floodwalls along sections of creek, and collector storm drains to more efficiently deliver stormwater to the creek. PROJECT NEED:Downtown Pleasant Hill and Poet's Corner areas are identified on the FEMA maps as having moderate flood risk. Area flooded in 1997 and again in 2006. City desires a project to take residents out of the floodplain. Early indications from the Corps study were favorable, but project ultimately did not have a sufficient benefit / cost ratio, or federal funding. This local, smaller project is the result. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 46 funds + City of Pleasant Hill funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$1,188,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:DA46 plan amendment needed before implementation of this project. $0 $0 $0 $528,000 $660,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:106 Drainage Area 46 $0 $0 $0 $528,000 $626,000 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 November 2018 8 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 57 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation at CCCSD Treatment Plant WORK ORDER:8348 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Raise levees along Grayson Creek along STA 8+00 to 39+00 LT to improve level of protection at CCCSD treatment plant. PROJECT NEED:Additional flood protection is desired at the CCCSD Treatment Plant from Grayson Creek. This is in addition to the 2007 project that increased flood protection to a 100-year design storm level. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Martinez area, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and CCCSD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,572,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $280,000 $292,000 $1,800,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:107 Flood Control Zone 3B $140,000 $146,000 $900,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Other $140,000 $146,000 $900,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 9 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 58 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson Creek Channel Fence Rehabilitation WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Repair Fences along Grayson Creek concrete channel as part of our Creek and Channel Safety Program PROJECT NEED:Existing fence posts are starting to rust and spalling concrete from the channel wall. This project would renovate existing fence posts and fence, rehabilitate the damaged concrete wall, and replace the failing fence with new material. This project would extend the useful life of the protective fenceline, as well as preventing further deterioration of the concrete wall as part of our Creek and Channel Safety Program. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:Public Safety PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:108 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 10 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 59 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Grayson Creek Sediment Removal WORK ORDER:8334 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from Grayson creek between confluence with Walnut Creek to Chilpancingo Parkway (about 9,000 linear feet in selected areas) PROJECT NEED:Remove accumulated sediment to restore design flood capacity of the channel. Exact areas to be desilted will be determined with a pre-design topographic silt survey. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV & V AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill, Pacheco PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,005,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Portions of this area was last desilted in 2006. Effort shared with Walnut Creek desilt (#118) $20,000 $125,000 $1,860,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:109 Flood Control Zone 3B $20,000 $125,000 $1,860,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 11 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 60 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project WORK ORDER:8285 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Transform Lower Walnut Creek from an antiquated, difficult to maintain, legacy USACE facility into a sustainable, environmentally sensitive facility for the next 50 years. Project includes modification of project levees, acquisition of flowage easements and possible reconfiguration of the channel conveyance to better accommodate sediment and habitat. PROJECT NEED:The Lower Walnut Creek project incorporates a new way of approaching the traditional methods of operating and maintaining a flood control facility. This alternative approach moves away from the single purpose, flood protection USACE design, to a sustainable, environmentally sensitive plan that will restore appropriate floodplains and habitat in the area. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Martinez, Pacheco, Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and Regional, State and federal Grant Funds (TBD) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$41,630,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Signature District project. Prior and future year expenditures not shown. Existing grants received from CDFW and EPA. Anticipated future grants to cover unfunded. $340,000 $692,000 $762,000 $13,950,000 $500,000 $450,000 $450,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:110 Flood Control Zone 3B $165,000 $292,000 $525,000 $4,700,000 $0 $0 $0 Grants $175,000 $400,000 $237,000 $1,250,000 $0 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $500,000 $450,000 $450,000 November 2018 12 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 61 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pacheco Marsh Restoration WORK ORDER:8494 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Project is another name for the North Reach of Lower Walnut Creek (CIP#110.) Pacheco Marsh is unique in that it has different partners for restoration than the rest of LWC and, as such, is worthy of a separate CIP designation. This project intends to directly follow implementation of LWC Restoration (CIP#110) and will provide recreational amenities, additional habitat creation and long term stewardship of the site. PROJECT NEED:A restored Pacheco Marsh will provide 126 acres of quality habitat for a number of rare and endangered species, as well as passive recreation amenities. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Martinez PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B + funds from EBRPD, John Muir Land Trust, and future state and federal grants (TBD) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$10,895,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:reference "Pacheco Marsh Public Access Plan-draft Vision Concepts", Alternative B (Placeworks. 4/102017) for details. Anticipate John Muir Land Trust funds to cover unfunded amount. $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $5,675,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:111 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $0 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000 $0 $0 November 2018 13 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 62 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Update DA 10 for Danville Area WORK ORDER:8302 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Update Drainage Area 10 Plan for Danville and develop a project for implementing the remaining elements of the drainage area plan in coordination with the Town of Danville PROJECT NEED:This project is needed to update existing drainage plan and determine future drainage improvements and related costs. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$86,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Prior year expenditures not shown. $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:113 Drainage Area 10 $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 14 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 63 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Update DA 13 Plan for Western Alamo WORK ORDER:8303 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Update the DA13 drainage plan and related costs PROJECT NEED:The adopted DA13 plan is old, and it does not reflect the current needs of the community. This project would update the plan so it is relevant, current, and ensures DA13 fees and ad valorem revenue are adequate to implement the needed capital projects. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Alamo PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 13 ad-valorem tax and drainage fee funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$174,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):No NOTE:Prior year expenditures not shown. $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:114 Drainage Area 13 $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 15 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 64 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Walnut Creek Sediment Removal - Clayton Valley Drain to Drop Structure 1 WORK ORDER:8334 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment from upland benches in Walnut Creek to restore channel capacity and restore wetlands PROJECT NEED:Remove accumulated sediment to restore design flood capacity of the channel. Exact areas to be desilted will be determined with a pre-design topographic silt survey. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord, Pleasant Hill PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$4,525,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Effort shared with Grayson desilt (#109) $50,000 $125,000 $4,250,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:118 Flood Control Zone 3B $50,000 $125,000 $4,250,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 16 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 65 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Kubicek Basin Sediment Removal WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove sediment and restore habitat to ensure basin continues to function as designed PROJECT NEED:The Pine Creek Detention Basin -- now known as the Kubicek Basin -- was designed for sediment storage. This sediment needs to be periodically removed to ensure proper functioning of the basin. Sediment has not been removed since the basin was constructed in the 1970s. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$88,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Prior year expenditures not shown. $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:121 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 November 2018 17 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 66 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pine Creek Dam Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:8346 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam and recommend retrofit improvements. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:This project would identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $190,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:122 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $190,000 $0 $0 November 2018 18 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 67 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pine Creek Reservoir Functional Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Conduct a assessment of the existing Pine Creek Dam to ensure it meets DSOD standards and still provides the proper hydraulic performance. Verify hydrologic design assumptions and compare to current development plans of the watershed. Determine if the downstream Kubicek Basin can hydraulically handle a situation where the Pine Creek Dam is removed and not replaced. PROJECT NEED:Pine Creek dam is an older facility; need to ensure it meets current safety standards and rehabilitate if needed. This project would cover assessment only, and will be revisited if significant rehabilitation is found to be necessary. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$143,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Assessment only; rehabilitation not included. Seismic evaluation is covered under a separate CIP entry because seismic work will likely be combined with other dams. $0 $0 $143,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:123 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $143,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 19 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 68 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Galindo Creek Improvements WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Participate with City of Concord and USACE to construct a stormwater detention basin on Galindo Creek upstream of Ygnacio Valley Road (CSU East Bay Campus). Basin will be created with a modification to the existing headwall. PROJECT NEED:This project would reduce flood risk to properties in the floodplain between Ygnacio Valley and the start of the concrete channel portion of Galindo Creek in the City of Concord. USACE and Concord have completed a federal reconnaissance study. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B and the City of Concord TOTAL PROJECT COST:$500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Assume Concord will be the lead agency for CEQA/permits. Expect larger total project with additional funding by other partners. $500k is max FC Zone 3B contribution. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $480,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:127 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $40,000 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $440,000 November 2018 20 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 69 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Flood Control Zone 3B Channels and Structures Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:8353 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV & V AFFECTED AREA:Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Concord, and unincorporated. PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$915,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $375,000 $400,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:130 Flood Control Zone 3B $375,000 $400,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 21 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 70 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Canyon Lakes Facilities Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:8361 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:The City of San Ramon PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DABA 75A TOTAL PROJECT COST:$100,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $10,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:132 Drainage Area 75A $10,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 22 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 71 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Rassier Ranch Basin Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:8362 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DABA 910 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$26,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:See #130. $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:134 Drainage Area 910 $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 23 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 72 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Shadow Creek Basin Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Blackhawk PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DABA 1010A TOTAL PROJECT COST:$30,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:136 Drainage Area 1010A $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 24 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 73 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:West Antioch Creek - DA55 Culverts at 10th Street WORK ORDER:8399 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Fund construction of quadruple box culverts on West Antioch Creek at 10th Street by the City of Antioch. PROJECT NEED:As reported by the City, this section of West Antioch Creek floods annually because of lack of capacity under 10th Street and through the old Ford Dealer. This project would help alleviate this flooding by constructing culverts with sufficient capacity and will connect to the previously widened channel downstream. The improvement of the channel upstream of 10th Street is a separate project in this CIP. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Local Funds (Drainage Area 55, City funds 50%), State Grants (IRWMP Prop 1E: 50%) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$1,800,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:City of Antioch is functional lead. DA55 contribution capped at $1.8 million per 2012 agreement with Antioch. (Prior year expenditures not shown.) $827,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:202 Drainage Area 55 $827,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 25 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 74 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Trembath Detention Basin WORK ORDER:8532 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct Trembath Detention Basin. Trembath Basin is a new facility. Trembath Basin will be regulated by State Division of Dam Safety. PROJECT NEED:This project is needed to provide flood protection in the lower watershed of East Antioch Creek in accordance with the adopted Drainage Area 56 (DA 56) plan. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 56 (Org 7566) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$11,690,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Prior and future year expenditures not shown. $90,000 $225,000 $1,050,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:207 Drainage Area 56 $90,000 $225,000 $1,050,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 26 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 75 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Lindsey Basin Finalization Tasks & R/W Transfer WORK ORDER:8126 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Develop an Operations & Maintenance manual and convey basin right of way to the City of Antioch for perpetual ownership and maintenance. Generate legal description of property to be conveyed to separate basin from developable remainder parcels. PROJECT NEED:This is a completed non-regional facility and needs to be conveyed to the local city for ownership and maintenance. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DA 56 funds (Org 7566) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$258,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO (predates HCP adoption) NOTE:Basin substantially completed in 2006 as part of Segment 1 of the SR4 Bypass. Still need to construct spillway across future Slaten Ranch Road.(Prior year expenditures not shown.) $0 $0 $11,000 $33,000 $16,000 $6,000 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:208 Drainage Area 56 $0 $0 $11,000 $33,000 $16,000 $6,000 $0 November 2018 27 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 76 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Develop Revenue Generating Sites at Lindsey Basin WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Prepare conceptual plans and a cost estimate for the development of the two District-owned remainder parcels near the Lindsey Basin. Market the parcels to generate maximum long-term revenue for the Drainage Area and / or the District. PROJECT NEED:The Lindsey Detention Basin was designed for future re-use of spoil disposal sites as revenue-generating development. This project will facilitate this long-planned development. Project timing is a rough estimate; actual development depends on the commercial real estate market. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area funds (Org,7566) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$593,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Future year expenditures not shown. $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 $99,000 $102,000 $102,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:209 Drainage Area 56 $0 $0 $17,000 $17,000 $99,000 $102,000 $102,000 November 2018 28 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 77 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:8355 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam and recommend retrofit improvements, if needed. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$330,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $130,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:210 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $130,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 29 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 78 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Dry Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam embankments and recommend retrofit improvements, if needed. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$360,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $210,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:211 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $210,000 November 2018 30 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 79 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Deer Creek Reservoir Seismic Assessment WORK ORDER:8355 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultant to assess seismic performance of existing dam and recommend retrofit improvements, if needed. Two-phase approach: start with hazard assessment, and proceed to more detailed geotechnical analysis if warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$200,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $90,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:212 Flood Control Zone 1 $90,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 31 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 80 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Capacity and Habitat Restoration WORK ORDER:8495 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Assess reservoir condition and habitat condition of impoundment area. Develop restoration plan that: maintains or improves level of flood protection, improves surrounding habitat, is compatible with surrounding state park uses, deals appropriately with accumulated mercury and accommodates mercury that will arrive at the basin in the next 50 years. After proper approvals and CEQA analysis, implement the preferred alternative. PROJECT NEED:Marsh Creek Reservoir was constructed in 1964 as a single-purpose facility and has reduced flood risks. Now nearing a half-century of use, the reservoir has poor water quality (impacted by mercury). With the opening of the state park on surrounding lands, there is an increased pressure to allow public access. A comprehensive restoration plan is needed to guide operations of this facility and development of future projects for the next 50 years. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1, future grant funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$5,500,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):Yes NOTE:Plan implementation may be delayed depending on other priorities for FC Zone 1 funds, (Future year expenditures not shown.) $55,521 $0 $129,000 $109,000 $468,000 $4,480,000 $210,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:213 Flood Control Zone 1 $55,521 $0 $129,000 $109,000 $468,000 $1,500,000 $210,000 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,980,000 $0 November 2018 32 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 81 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Supplemental Capacity WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Raise channel banks, levees and construct floodwalls to improve flood protection PROJECT NEED:A 2010 District study identified the need for additional channel capacity upon ultimate development of the watershed. This project is needed to ensure 100-year storms are contained in the channel without overtopping and flooding adjacent neighborhoods. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1, Drainage Area 130, future grant funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$3,664,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:See the 2010 study on file to contain 100-year flood flows and contain 50-year flood flows with freeboard. (Future year expenditures not shown.) $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $77,000 $578,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:215 Drainage Area 130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $77,000 $578,000 November 2018 33 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 82 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Widening Between Dainty Avenue and Sand Creek WORK ORDER:8466 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen sections of the Marsh Creek Channel to improve peak flood capacity. Reconstruct access roads / trails, and construct a large retaining wall along the left bank PROJECT NEED:Marsh Creek in this vicinity does not have capacity to contain the 100-year event, or the 50-year event with freeboard. Additional channel capacity is needed. This project is the second phase of the project at Dainty Road (and upstream) that was built in the late 1990s. This project is developed in collaboration with and is part of the larger Three Creeks Parkway Restoration Project. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 and Drainage Area 130 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,564,800 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $52,100 $200,000 $1,734,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:216 Flood Control Zone 1 $26,050 $100,000 $867,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Drainage Area 130 $26,050 $100,000 $867,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 34 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 83 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion WORK ORDER:8447 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Excavate the storage area of the existing Deer Creek Reservoir to increase stormwater holding capacity and reduce flood flows downstream PROJECT NEED:This project would increase storage capacity of Deer Creek Reservoir to protect downstream properties from flooding. Work to date has established that it is more beneficial to expand the future storage volume behind the existing dam by selectively excavating the storage area rather than raising the dam. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$6,072,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $0 $22,000 $11,000 $66,000 $88,000 $594,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:217 Drainage Area 130 $0 $0 $22,000 $11,000 $66,000 $88,000 $594,000 November 2018 35 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 84 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Deer Creek Reservoir Expansion - R/W Acquisition WORK ORDER:8463 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Acquire additional land rights over area currently encumbered only by a flowage easement. This is needed for expansion of the storage area of the Deer Creek Reservoir, located south of Balfour Road in Brentwood. PROJECT NEED:Need to retain additional stormwater in Deer Creek Reservoir to protect downstream properties. Instead of raising the dam, the plan is to expand the storage volume behind the existing dam by selectively excavating the storage area. The existing flowage easement is insufficient to do so; need to upgrade flowage easement into a drainage easement. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$214,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):N/A NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $149,000 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:218 Drainage Area 130 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $149,000 $0 $0 November 2018 36 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 85 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Upper Sand Creek Basin Surplus Material WORK ORDER:8517 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Coordinate removal of Upper Sand Creek Basin material by others, separate from main USCB contract. Includes material removed in advance of construction as well as material removed post construction. Common customers include contractors, developers and other agencies needing high quality fill material. PROJECT NEED:Brokering dirt removal in this way typically represents an excellent value (in cost/yd3) for the District. Interest in material (and thus cost) is highly dependent on the economy. Each cubic yard of material removed gets the basin incrementally closer to its ultimate volume at a reduced cost per cubic yard. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DA 130, FC Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$458,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Prior and future expenditures not shown. $10,000 $72,000 $11,000 $66,000 $11,000 $66,000 $11,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:220 Drainage Area 130 $10,000 $72,000 $11,000 $66,000 $11,000 $66,000 $11,000 November 2018 37 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 86 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Lower Sand Creek Basin Construction WORK ORDER:8492 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a 300 ac-ft regional detention basin on Sand Creek. The existing 40 ac-ft basin will be converted into an 300 ac-ft offline basin with new intake structure, primary and emergency spillways, low flow channel and riparian mitigation area. PROJECT NEED:In conjunction with the Upper Sand Creek Basin, this lower basin will reduce stormwater flows in Sand Creek and in Marsh Creek. With the upper basin in place, the 100 year 12 hour flow rate is 1230 cfs. Once completed, the lower basin will reduce this flow rate to 209 cfs, and provide improved flood protection for Brentwood and Oakley. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Oakley, Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 130, possible future Federal, State and local grants, Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$7,103,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $20,000 $20,000 $61,000 $116,000 $583,000 $424,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:222 Drainage Area 130 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $61,000 $116,000 $583,000 $424,000 November 2018 38 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 87 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek and Sand Creek Structures Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:8360 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:The Cities of Brentwood and Oakley PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$510,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $310,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:227 Flood Control Zone 1 $310,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 39 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 88 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Kellog Conditions Assessment WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Need to identify deficiencies and conduct a retrofit plan, if needed. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:The Cities of Byron and Discovery Bay PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:1 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$23,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $23,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:228 Unfunded $23,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 40 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 89 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Marsh Creek Reservoir Emergency Spillway Rehabilitation WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Improve performance of spillway by extending concrete apron to Marsh Creek PROJECT NEED:To avoid toe erosion upon use of spill way SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Brentwood PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$1,100,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N): NOTE: $0 $0 $150,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:232 Flood Control Zone 1 $0 $0 $150,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 41 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 90 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Ramon Creek Watershed Study WORK ORDER:8541 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The Watershed Planning-Engineering group is studying the hydraulics of San Ramon Creek through the use of HEC- RAS modeling. PROJECT NEED:The current hydraulics report was created in 1977 and the future hydraulics report will supersede its predecessor. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:San Ramon PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$90,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:This study is needed to verify the hydraulic performance of the previously improved sections and to gauge the need for future capacity improvements. $20,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:138 Flood Control Zone 3B $20,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 42 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 91 of 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 13 Line F-1 Storm Drainage in Alamo WORK ORDER:8303 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a drainage line that will connect with the existing drainage network and reduce local flooding issues. The newly created drainage line (Line F-1) will consist of a 30-inch pipe that will run parallel to the Iron Horse Trail Corridor from existing line “F” at Las Trampas Road (1300 ft.), to the intersection of South Avenue. From this point the pipe will extend another 150 ft. to the southwest, to the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court (Fig.1). Drainage inlet structures will be placed every 250 feet (as per the County criteria) including: 6 inlets on the Iron Horse Trail, 1 manhole on Las Trampas Road, and 2 inlets in the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court. PROJECT NEED:To address recurring flooding complications at locations along South Avenue; the intersection of South Avenue and Wayland Lane, and the intersection of South Avenue and La Serena Court. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Alamo PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 13 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$620,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $20,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:139 Drainage Area 13 $20,000 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 November 2018 43 / 4311-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 92 of 124 Appendix B Unprogrammed Future Projects Details 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 93 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat Creek Habitat Improvements (USACE 1135 Program) WORK ORDER:8619 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Rehabilitate fish ladder, reconfigure and expand sediment basin and improve riparian habitat throughout the limits of the previous Army Corps of Engineers project. PROJECT NEED:This project is needed to improve flood control protection and wildlife habitat at Wildcat Creek. The fish ladder at Wildcat Creek is inoperative and the sediment basin needs to be expanded. Sediment accumulates underneath riparian vegetation that makes its removal impossible. This has reduced the level of flood control protection and increased maintenance costs. The Corps' 1135 program is intended to address these concerns, but progress is slowed by variable levels of federal funding. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Richmond PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:2 FUNDING SOURCE(S):USACE 1135 Program (75% - $5M limit) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,000,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:see also http://www.spn.usace.army.mil/projects/wildcatcreek1135.html. Local match funding is not secured. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,000,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:7 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 November 2018 1 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 94 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Wildcat / San Pablo Creeks Phase II WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Channel improvements in Wildcat Creek and San Pablo Creek in the City of San Pablo upstream of BNSF railroad tracks PROJECT NEED:The previous Corps projects stopped at the BNSF railroad. Significant residual flood risk remains in the portions of San Pablo and Wildcat Creeks in the City of San Pablo upstream of the BNSF railroad. This project would consist of the coordination needed with the Corps for expansion of the system upstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:San Pablo PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):City of San Pablo, US Army Corps of Engineers TOTAL PROJECT COST:$12,045,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $12,045,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:9 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,045,000 November 2018 2 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 95 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pinole Creek Habitat Restoration (1135 Project) WORK ORDER:8493 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Improve riparian habitat throughout the limits of the previous Army Corps of Engineers project. Remove possible fish barriers and improve habitat while preserving and expanding flood conveyance. Work within the USACE 1135 Program to ensure federal participation in this project. PROJECT NEED:The Pinole Creek USACE project is dated and single purpose. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration has identified Pinole Creek as primary steelhead habitat in the west Contra Costa County. Habitat improvements are needed to ensure migrating steelhead pass successfully through the project area to habitat upstream. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Pinole PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):City of Pinole, USACE 1135 Program (75% - $5M limit) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$6,250,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $6,250,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:12 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,250,000 November 2018 3 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 96 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Sustainable Capacity Improvement at Rodeo Creek WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Rehabilitate or replace concrete-lined portion of creek to improve conveyance, restore habitat PROJECT NEED:Rodeo Creek is a 1960s era USACE channel, is devoid of most habitat, and is difficult to keep desilted, especially in the lowest reach. A new, more sustainable design of the creek is needed, and it has the potential to serve as a catalyst for further revitalization of the adjacent community. This project would also reduce long term dredging costs. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Rodeo PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:3 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Unfunded TOTAL PROJECT COST:$10,285,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $10,285,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:17 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,285,000 November 2018 4 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 97 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 67 - Tice Creek Bypass WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct 66-inch bypass pipe in Tice Valley Boulevard, Meadow Road and Lancaster to provide a bypass for storm flows in Tice Creek PROJECT NEED:The 2004 completion of the Rossmoor Detention Basin significantly reduced flood risk for this area providing approximately a 20-year level of protection from Tice Creek. This long-planned bypass pipe would provide additional conveyance while allowing Tice Creek to remain in it's natural state. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Grant funds, City of Walnut Creek funds, other funds TBD. TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,481,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,481,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:117 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,481,000 November 2018 5 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 98 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 33A Concord Boulevard Culvert Replacement WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Replace an undersized 60-inch culvert under Concord Blvd with a 117-inch by 79-inch arch culvert PROJECT NEED:The existing culvert is undersized and stormwater backs up and inundates Concord Blvd. The replacement culvert will be able to pass a 25-year storm event, lessening the risk of flooding on Concord Blvd. This is a cooperative project with the City of Concord. Per the 5-24-2005 JEPA, DA 33A will contribute a maximum of 90% of available funds which is currently approximately $209k. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Concord PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 33A funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$297,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $297,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:120 Drainage Area 33A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $209,779 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $87,221 November 2018 6 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 99 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pine Creek Reservoir Sediment Removal and Capacity Restoration WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove accumulated sediment in Pine Creek Reservoir to restore design flood storage capacity. Create wetlands in new reservoir bottom as mitigation of impacts. Rehabilitate primary and emergency spillways to extend design life. PROJECT NEED:Another CIP project will first perform a functional assessment to verify continued need for reservoir. If found to still be needed, then this project will restore design functionality and extend the design life. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:Walnut Creek, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$5,000,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Seismic evaluation is covered under a separate CIP entry because seismic work will likely be combined with other dams. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $5,000,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:124 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 November 2018 7 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 100 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:San Ramon Creek Sediment Removal near San Ramon Bypass WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Desilt San Ramon Creek downstream of the San Ramon Bypass diversion structure in Alamo to the bypass channel at the San Ramon PP Corridor PROJECT NEED:The San Ramon Creek Bypass Channel has a complex series of weirs allowing both low flows and high flows to continue down San Ramon Creek. Flows between those extremes are bypassed through the bypass system. The grades in San Ramon Creek downstream of the low flow pipe outfall prevent those low flows from passing into San Ramon Creek. This project would allow base flows to remain in the natural channel. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:IV AFFECTED AREA:District IV PROGRAM TYPE:system Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$363,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $363,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:125 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $363,000 November 2018 8 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 101 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Green Valley Creek Improvements up to 1st Crossing of Diablo Road WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:The existing channel is incised and lacks the capacity to pass the 100-year flood event. The project is needed to lower the flood risk to the surrounding neighborhood. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:4 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$6,600,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $6,600,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:128 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,600,000 November 2018 9 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 102 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Green Valley Creek Improvements Upstream of 2nd Crossing of Diablo Road WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Hire specialized consultants to assess conditions of existing facilities. Two-phase approach: start with initial assessment, and proceed to more detailed assessment as warranted. PROJECT NEED:Green Valley Creek at this location has erosion pressures and capacity issues. Past creek improvements stopped just downstream. This project will improve erosion and capacity conditions. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:II AFFECTED AREA:Danville PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Flood Control Zone 3B & Town of Danville TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,024,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $1,804,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:129 Flood Control Zone 3B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,804,000 November 2018 10 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 103 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 48B Line A at Port Chicago Highway WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and Construct 595 LF of 84-inch storm drain crossing Port Chicago Highway near Skipper Drive. This is a portion of DA 48B, Line A. PROJECT NEED:The existing 60-inch pipe under Port Chicago Highway is undersized and in poor condition. Construction of the replacement 84-inch storm drain will extend the service life of the facility and reduce flood risk for the surrounding community. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Bay Point PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Contra Costa County Redevelopment, DA 48B TOTAL PROJECT COST:$429,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $429,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:201 Drainage Area 48B $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $429,000 November 2018 11 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 104 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:West Antioch Creek Improvements - L Street to 10th Street WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct channel improvements from the downstream end of "L" Street Crossing to the upstream end of the 10th Street culverts in conjunction with the City of Antioch PROJECT NEED:The current channel was constructed only to an interim capacity and currently does not contain a 100-year storm event. Bottlenecks include the UPRR arch culvert and the narrow channel through the fairgrounds. This project will need to be constructed prior to constructing the third 10-foot pipe under Highway 4. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, City of Antioch, Grants, developer funds (upon development of the fairgrounds) TOTAL PROJECT COST:$4,906,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Project needs to proceed before CIP#204. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $4,906,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:203 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,906,000 November 2018 12 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 105 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:West Antioch Creek Improvements at Highway 4 WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Complete the storm drain system between "L" Street and Fitzuren Road. Work includes a new headwall downstream of "L" Street, one 8' by 10' box culvert under "L" Street, a single 10' diameter storm drain up to and under Highway 4 to connect to the exiting 10' pipes just north of Fitzuren Road. This results in a complete, triple 10' storm drain system. PROJECT NEED:Caltrans / CCTA has constructed a second bore under the highway as part of freeway widening in 2015. This CIP project completes the third bore between Fitzuren Road and "L" Street, and should not be constructed until downstream improvements (W. Antioch Creek at 10th Street, and W. Antioch Creek 10th Street to "L" Street) are constructed. See project #203. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III & V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, City of Antioch, Grants TOTAL PROJECT COST:$2,200,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Project should follow construction of project #203. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $2,200,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:204 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,000 November 2018 13 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 106 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Fitzuren Road Remainder Parcel WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Prepare conceptual plans and facilitate development of three District-owned parcels on Fitzuren Road. Market these parcels for a commercial use, such as a restaurant or neighborhood retail. PROJECT NEED:These parcels were purchased in the 1980s to allow the construction of three large storm drains to carry West Antioch Creek. They were purchased with the intent of developing the unused portion once the storm drains were installed. The storm drain was designed to maximize the unused portion of the parcels and thus maximize the revenue generating potential for the District and DA 55. This project will follow the construction of the final 10' storm drain through the parcel. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 55, Flood Control District TOTAL PROJECT COST:$215,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE:Project should follow construction of project #204. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $215,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:205 Drainage Area 55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215,000 November 2018 14 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 107 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:East Antioch Creek Marsh Restoration WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Design and construct marsh and floodplain improvements on East Antioch Creek downstream of Cavallo Road. Includes marina outlet channel (or equivalent), hazardous material clean-up on affected portion of Hickmont site, and three new box culverts under Wilbur Avenue. PROJECT NEED:Provide flood protection in the lower watershed of East Antioch Creek in accordance with the adopted Drainage Area 56 (DA 56) plan SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Antioch PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):Drainage Area 56 TOTAL PROJECT COST:$7,585,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):Yes NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $7,585,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:206 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,585,000 November 2018 15 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 108 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:DA 109 - Kellogg Creek Project Development WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Re-analyze the Kellogg Creek (Drainage Area 109) Plan and develop projects for future implementation PROJECT NEED:The current DA 109 plan is conceptual, and while sufficient to collect funds for improvements, the plan lacks the detail to develop and prioritize projects in the watershed. This effort will re-study the DA 109 plan to define specific projects for implementation, rank those projects, and then begin implementation in priority order. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:III AFFECTED AREA:Town of Discovery Bay PROGRAM TYPE:System Expansion PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):DA 109 Funds TOTAL PROJECT COST:$270,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):YES NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $270,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:225 Drainage Area 109 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,000 November 2018 16 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 109 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Canada di Cierbo Habitat Improvement WORK ORDER:WO TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Create a mitigation bank for County and District mitigation needs. Acquire right of way, develop restoration plan, implement plan and reap benefits. PROJECT NEED:Public projects often have unavoidable habitat impacts. Often, the remedy is to 'buy in' to a bank which is often located outside of the county. While this provides habitat mitigation, it does little to actually offset the impacts locally. The west part of CCC is underserved for this type of bank. Canada di Cierbo seeks to remedy this and provide quality, local mitigation and habitat improvement. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:V AFFECTED AREA:Crockett, Unincorporated County PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S):TBD TOTAL PROJECT COST:$3,000,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N): NOTE: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $3,000,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:23 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 November 2018 17 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 110 of 124 UNPROGRAMMED FUTURE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT PROJECT NAME:Pinole Creek Capacity Assessment WORK ORDER:TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Assess creek capacity and watershed conditions and develop alternatives for improving flood protection in the area. PROJECT NEED:Watershed conditions have changed significantly with land development projects decreasing flood protection in the area. This project is intended to study watershed and creek conditions and develop alternatives for improving flood protection levels. SUPERVISOR DISTRICT:I AFFECTED AREA:Cities of Hercules and Pinole PROGRAM TYPE:System Preservation PROJECT PRIORITY:5 FUNDING SOURCE(S): TOTAL PROJECT COST:$300,000 EAST COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (Y/N):NO NOTE:Zone 9 (Pinole Creek) is significantly underfunded. Funding for this item is very uncertain. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Future $300,000 PLANNED PROJECT EXPENDITURES AND FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT EXPENDITURES: FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 ID:26 Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 November 2018 18 / 1811-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 111 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 7. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:CONSIDER report: Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Issues: Legislation, Related Updates, take ACTION as Appropriate Submitted For: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE, Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: 1 Referral Name: REVIEW legislative matters on transportation, water, and infrastructure. Presenter: John Cunningham, DCD Contact: John Cunningham (925)674-7883 Referral History: This is a standing item on the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee referral list and meeting agenda. Referral Update: In developing transportation related issues and proposals to bring forward for consideration by TWIC, staff receives input from the Board of Supervisors (BOS), references the County's adopted Legislative Platforms, coordinates with our legislative advocates, partner agencies and organizations, and consults with the Committee itself. This report includes four sections, 1: LOCAL, 2: REGIONAL, 3: STATE, and 4: FEDERAL . 1. LOCAL No report in November. 2. REGIONAL No report in November 3. STATE 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 112 of 124 The County's legislation consultant will be in attendance to discuss the issues below, the outcome of the November 6 election, and other issues of concern to the County. 3.1: Iron Horse Corridor - Removal of Encumbrances Background : The County's State Legislative Platform includes: "239: SUPPORT regional coordination that provides for local input in addressing transportation needs....Consistent with that position, relief from the requirements imposed on the County by the state relative to the Iron Horse corridor would foster coordination along this multi-jurisdictional corridor. Such relief could be provided through administrative action or County sponsored legislation." Update • Consistent with the highlighted policy above, the County's legislative consultant submitted a draft bill to the Office of the State Legislative Counsel. The draft is being reviewed and is currently receiving minor edits and additions. 3.2: Seniors and Persons with Disabilities (SPD) State Transportation Funding Program Background : The County approved the proposal (TWIC 9/10/18, BOS on 9/25/18) which proposes a mechanism to strategically increase funding for transportation programs serving the senior/disabled population. It is acknowledged at the local, regional, state, and federal level that transportation programs for this population are underfunded and underdeveloped. These deficiencies are set to increase as demographic and public health shifts amplify issues. Update • The proposal was submitted to the Office of the State Legislative Counsel by our advocate, we are awaiting a draft. • Peter Engel (CCTA - Director of Programs), Linsey Willis (CCTA - Director of External Affairs), Rick Ramacier (Gen. Manager - County Connection), Mark Watts (County legislative consultant) and John Cunningham (CC County, Principal Planner) met on October 19th to discuss the proposal. County staff reached out to Mr. Ramacier as he is the Chair of the California Transit Association's (CTA) Legislative Committee. Mr. Ramacier offered the following observations on the proposal: • There was acknowledgement of the need to increase funding for SPD types of programs, there is no dispute on that point. • Transit advocates current have two other prirorities at this time which are 1) dealing with the impending cost of electrifying their fleet, and 2) their general interest in increasing/protecting revenue for their normal/everyday operations. • Considering these other priorities, there may not be enough bandwidth with transit advocates to also take on the SPD funding effort despite the acknowledged need. • Mr. Ramacier offered to share the proposal with CTA staff and get their feedback. 4. FEDERAL No written report in November. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): CONSIDER report on Local, Regional, State, and Federal Transportation Related Legislative Issues and take ACTION as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 113 of 124 There is no fiscal impact. Attachments RN_1820994_Iron Horse_10_09 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 114 of 124 75506 An act relating to transportation. 10/05/18 03:55PM RN 18 20994 PAGE 1 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 115 of 124 75506 10/05/18 03 :55PM RN 18 20994 PAGE 2 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) The Southern Pacific Railroad's San Ramon Branch Line started service in 1891. That section of the rail line in the County of Contra Costa extended 18.5 miles from the City of Concord to the Alameda County line. (b) In 1978, Southern Pacific Railroad received federal permission to abandon the rail line. The line's railroad tracks were removed over the following one to two years . (c) The County of Contra Costa obtained $10,579,000 in Transportation Planning and Development Account (TP&D) grants starting in 1982 to fund a feasibility study and pay for the partial acquisition of the San Ramon Branch Corridor's right-of-way, including a 1982 TP&D grant, MT-83-16, for $2,000,000, a 1985 TP&D grant, MT-86-1, for $2,579,000, and a 1986 TP&D grant, MT-87-2, for $6,000,000. (d) The grants' requirements included a feasibility study with costs to be shared equally by state and non-state sources . The feasibility study investigated the feasibility of possible transportation improvements within the right-of-way and the Interstate Route 680 corridor between the Cities of Concord and Pleasanton. (e) The County of Contra Costa raised some of the non-state moneys necessary to purchase the right-of-way through the sale of easements to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and the Contra Costa County Flood Control District. The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency also acquired portions of the right-of-way within the corridor's redevelopment area. (f) In 1986 the County of Contra Costa entered into a license agreement with East Bay Regional Park District to operate a 10-foot wide paved multi-use trail within the right-of-way called the "Iron Horse Regional Trail." On July 5, 2017, the East Bay Regional Park District's board of directors authorized an electric bicycle pilot program, for Class 1 and 2 E-bikes, on the Iron Horse Regional Trail. (g) When the County of Contra Costa purchased the right-of-way, water lines and a high pressure gas line were already in place in the right-of-way. The county has expanded access to utilities by authorizing the installation of a reclaimed waterline, a fiber optic line, sewer lines, and additional water lines. (h) The County of Contra Costa identified, and restricted, the use of a 34-foot wide transit area throughout the right-of-way for future transit use. (i) The County of Contra Costa has continued to use the right-of-way, while emphasizing active transportation projects. The Iron Horse Regional Trail is the East Bay Regional Park District's most used trail and the county, through grant funding and project sponsors, constructed alternate trails in several sections of the right-of-way. Alternate trails allow walkers and joggers to use the right-of-way separately from cyclists. U) The County of Contra Costa receives requests from adjacent cities and companies to make improvements to the right-of-way. Approving the requests continues to be a challenge while maintaining the 34-foot wide transit area. (k) A bus way or transit guideway is no longer an appropriate use of the right-of-way. The right-of-way has annually been used by over one million recreational users and commuters. A bus way or transit guideway is not operationally or financially = = ==== - ""'""= 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 116 of 124 ' . 75506 10/05/18 03 :55PM RN 18 20994 PAGE 3 feasible due to the substantial density of immediately adjacent urban and suburban uses and the corresponding density ofboth road and trail crossings. SEC. 2. The state and the California Transportation Commission hereby relinquish their rights to reimbursement established pursuant to commission Resolution MT-83-16 (December 17, 1982), TP&D Abandoned Railroad Right-of-Way Program, commission Resolution MT-86-1 (September 1985), TP&D Transit Capital Improvement Funding, and commission Resolution MT-87-2 (July 1986), TP&D Abandoned Railroad Right-of-Way Program, relating to the San Ramon Branch Corridor. -0- 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 117 of 124 75506 Bill No. as introduced, 10/05118 03 :55PM RN 18 20994 PAGE 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST ---==---General Subject: Transportation: California Transportation Commission: San Ramon Branch Corridor: reimbursement. Existing law creates the California Transportation Commission, with various powers and duties relative to the programming oftransportation capital projects and allocation of funds to those projects, pursuant to the state transportation improvement program and various other transportation funding programs. Through certain commission resolutions, the commission allocated moneys appropriated to it in the 1980s from the Transportation Planning and Development Account to the County of Contra Costa for the acquisition of a specified right-of-way, and for associated projects, relating to the San Ramon Branch Corridor. Those resolutions require the county to reimburse the state if the county fails to meet specified conditions. This bill would relinquish the rights of the state and the commission to reimbursement pursuant to those resolutions . Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no . State-mandated local program: no. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 118 of 124 TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 8. Meeting Date:11/08/2018 Subject:Miscellaneous Updates on TWIC Referrals Submitted For: TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE, Department:Conservation & Development Referral No.: ALL Referral Name: Miscellaneous Updates on TWIC Referrals Presenter: John Cunningham, Department of Conservation and Development Contact: John Cunningham (925)674-7833 Referral History: Updates and reports on referrals to the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee are provided on an as needed/as available basis. TWIC referrals for 2018 can be found here: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/49651 Referral Update: Groundwater Management/Sustainability: (TWIC Referral #6: Review and monitor the establishment of Groundwater Sustainability Agencies and Groundwater Sustainability Plans for the three medium priority groundwater basins within Contra Costa County as required by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.) Background: The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was signed in to law in September 2014. Its purpose is to ensure better local and regional management of groundwater use and it seeks to have a sustainable groundwater management in California by 2042 through management of groundwater sustainability by local and regional authorities. Update: Contra Costa County GSA continues to work with the other east CC County GSAs, our consultant and DWR in the preparation of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Tracy Subbasin. We’ve created a website, an email list serve for interested parties and are preparing a stakeholder outreach communication plan. The GSAs in Contra Costa County, in collaboration w/ the GSAs in San Joaquin County, have submitted an application with DWR to divide the Tracy Subbasin along the County line. We expect a draft decision from DWR by the end of the month. Ryan Hernandez expects to provide a full report on the development of the GSP and Basin Boundary Modification application to TWIC in the first quarter of 2019. A summary of the October Tracy Subbasin - GSP Coordination meeting is attached. Measure WW Grants/Expenditure Plan: (TWIC Referral #10: Monitor the status of county park maintenance issues including, ...implementation of Measure WW grants and expenditure plan.) Background : Measure WW was approved by voters in Alameda and Contra Costa counties in November 2008. The measure extended Measure AA, approved in 1988, to help the East Bay Regional Park District11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 119 of 124 2008. The measure extended Measure AA, approved in 1988, to help the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) meet the increasing demand to preserve open space for recreation and wildlife habitat. It made funding available directly to cities, counties, and special park districts for high priority community park projects. Update: County staff provides reports to the EBRPD twice yearly, the latest report is attached. Staff provided the following additional comments: EBRPD extended the project deadline to December, 2021 (from 2018) earlier this year. The County was required to allocate approximately $46,000 by March of this year. The funds were split between the two projects that had additional costs due to county requirements (Tice Valley Pocket Park/Pathway and Urban Tilth Roots and Restoration Farm). With the exception of the Urban Tilth project, most projects should be complete by the end of the year or early 2019. Accessible Transportation Plan Update (TWIC Referral #17: Review transportation plans and services for specific populations, including...the Contra Costa County Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan) Background : The Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) Plan was included as an action in the 2016 Measure X Transportation Expenditure Plan. After Measure X failed to pass, the ATS Plan was included in the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's (CCTA's) 2017 Countywide Transportation Plan. CCTA and County staff collaborated on a Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant to develop the ATS Plan and the grant was awarded to CCTA in early in 2018. Both agencies are now working collaboratively on the ATS Plan. Grant match funding requirements are being met by by CCTA (cash contribution) and County (in-kind staff time). Update: CCTA and County staff are establishing the administrative framework for the study: A draft memorandum of understanding has been developed and is being distributed to participating entities. The Request for Proposals and Scope of Work has been finalized. CCTA is preparing to post it using their PlanetBids service. Recommendation(s)/Next Step(s): RECEIVE updates on referrals to the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee, and DIRECT staff as appropriate. Fiscal Impact (if any): None. Attachments SGMA-Notes - October 31 2018 Measure WW - Status Report: Unincorp CC County 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 120 of 124 Tracy Subbasin October 31, 2018 Page | 1 Notes Tracy Subbasin - GSP Coordination Facilitation Services & Other Business When: Wednesday Oct. 31, 2018, 10:00 a.m. to 10:58 a.m. On-line Meeting ABSTRACT: The primary focus of the meeting was on outreach and communications topics. The group provided quick feedback on GSA communications activities and revisited the process for documenting outreach. They then reviewed a stakeholder survey and portions of the Communications Workbook and Communications Plan and developed next steps for implementation and/or distribution of each. Also discussed was the status of requests and interactions with the Department of Water Resources including access to facilitation services, technical support services the Prop 1 contract status. For the most part, additional support from DWR will occur after the new year. The group determined that they could forgo the November meeting and meet via phone/webinar on December 12. During that meeting the group will review the outcomes of communications activities and discuss next steps related to the existing boundary modification request. ATTENDANCE: David Weisenberger Debbie Cannon Eric Brennan Lisa Beutler Michael Davies Mike Yeraka Nick Janes Pat Corey Ryan Hernandez Tracy Tope Vicki Kretsinger ACTION ITEMS: ITEM OWNER DUE 1. Stakeholder Survey - Please provide any suggested edits on the survey to Lisa Beutler. The online survey link is here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/TracySGMA1 All COB Nov. 7. 2. Stakeholder Postcard (same text can be used for email) - Please provide any suggested edits to Lisa Beutler All COB Nov. 7. 3. Mail Postcards Mike Yeraka Nov. 9-12 4. Email Survey Notice Ryan Hernandez Nov. 9-12 5. Put Survey Info on Project Website CCWD Nov. 9 6. Provide presentation on survey feedback Lisa Beutler Dec. 12 7. Set New Meeting Dates Eric Brennan Week of Oct. 29 8. Forward additional potential stakeholders list to group for input/ review. Lisa December 1 9. Communication Plan Edits Lisa will send Nov. 12 Due back to her Dec. 1 Go Final Dec. 12 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 121 of 124 Tracy Subbasin October 31, 2018 Page | 2 Discussion Items 1. Welcome and Greetings Eric Brennan, City of Brentwood & Debbie Cannon, Luhdorff & Scalmanini, Consulting Engineers welcomed the group. Lisa Beutler, Stantec (facilitator) led introductions and reviewed the meeting agenda and goals. 2. Communications Updates Mike Yeraka recapped his use of the General Manager’s report to update his Board during a publicly scheduled meeting. This report was circulated for the use of other GSA members, to support consistent messaging among the group and share workload. Mike also noted that the Postcard outreach on the boundary modification, discussed in the last meeting, had been accomplished and that there had not been a lot of feedback. Ryan Hernandez indicated there had been one addition to the mailing list as a result of the outreach and that they had included the Postcard information on the project website. Debbie Cannon reminded the group that she was documenting outreach and people were to provide quarterly updates to her. 3. Stakeholder Survey Lisa provided an overview of the stakeholder survey and discussed the goals, intended audiences and approach for distributing it. She suggested that the GSAs not just think of it as an input tool but also an education tool and asked for any feedback on questions, edits, etc. The group decided they would advertise the survey via Postcard, post on project websites, and send to interested parties via the project email. 4. Communications Plan and Workbook Lisa provided a quick review of the Communications Plan and reminded the group to utilize the communications workbook distributed at the previous meeting. The group set up a schedule for final review of the document by Dec. 12. 5. FSS DWR Services for 2019 Lisa was advised by DWR the group would need to reapply for assistance after this support cycle ended in December 2018. Lisa explained this was one reason she was attempting to complete as many tasks as possible prior to the end of December. 6. DWR PROP 1 Contract Status, Technical Support Services Application Eric indicated he would more to report at the next meeting but that work had continued. 7. Status of MOU between City and SJC This is a project Chris is working on. He was not available for today’s session. 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 122 of 124 Tracy Subbasin October 31, 2018 Page | 3 8. Change of Meeting Schedule The group agreed to adjust the schedule and skip the November meeting. 9. Items for Next Agenda The next meeting will include: Project related updates and follow-up from the day’s session. Go final on Communications Planning Materials Updates on the Basin Boundary Modification Request 10. Next Steps, Action Item Review Lisa reviewed the next steps and action items. 11. Adjourn With all business of the day accomplished, the group adjourned at 10:58 a.m. NEXT MEETING East Contra Costa / Tracy Subbasin GSA Coordination Meeting Wed, Dec 12, 2018 10:00 PM - 11:15 PM PST Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. - https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/491285733 Phone. - United States: +1 (408) 650-3123, Access Code: 491-285-733 11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 123 of 124 Agency: Unincorporated Contra Costa$3,046,374Master Contract Number: 314500XDate Report Submitted:7/17/2018#Project NumberProject Amount Project NameApproval StatusExpended to date Pre-ConstructionExpended to date ConstructionExpected Completion Date1 314501 $600,000Iron Horse Corridor ImprovementsAPPROVED$69,958.79$365,216.66 12/31/20182 314502 $50,000Pacheco Creekside TrailCLOSED$9,436.28$40,563.72 10/1/20173 314503 $623,187Tice Valley Pocket Park and PathwayAPPROVED$118,442.49$0.00 12/31/20184 314504 $550,000Las Juntas Elementary Playfield RenovationAPPROVED$0.00$0.00 10/1/20185 314505 $623,187Urban Tilth Roots and Restoration Farm INCOMPLETE$0.00$0.00 12/31/20186 314506 $600,000Byron Union School District Family PlaygroundAPPROVED$20,665.00$149,726.28 12/31/2018314507 $0Mira Vista FieldsCANCELED$0.00$0.00Subtotal$218,502.56 $555,506.66$774,009.22$2,272,364.78$3,046,374.00Total Grant Funded Expenditures to DateMaster Contract Amount:East Bay Regional Park District MEASURE WW LOCAL GRANT PROGRAMPROJECT STATUS REPORT Ending Date: Unexpended Grant AmountTotal Contract Amount June 30th, report due July 31st December 31st, report due January 31st10/31/20181Status ReportUnincorporated Contra Costa13_2018July.xls11-08-18 TWIC Mtg Agenda Packet - Pg. 124 of 124