Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02241987 - 1.52 TO- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Phil Batchelor Contra County Administrator Costa DATE'. February 10, 1987 County SUBJECT: Legislation: Assembly Bill 451 (Peace) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(_S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION• Support AB 451 by Assemblyman Steve Peace, which defines "higher level of services" in relation to the Constitutional requirement that the Legislature fund State-mandated local programs which require a new or higher level of service in order to clarify that it is the Legislature' s intent that a requirement for a higher level of Service, even on a program which was in existence prior to the Constitutional date after which such programs had to be funded by the Legislature, are included in, the requirement that they be funded by the Legislature. BACKGROUND: A recent California Supreme Court decision has taken a rather narrow view of the Legislative and Constitutional requirement that the Legislature fund State-mandated local programs which require a new or higher level of service after a specified date. The Court has concluded that unless a program is "unique" to local government, the Legislature can mandate a higher level of service without the need to finance that higher level of service. This is a devastating interpretation since it effectively protects many State-mandated programs which may also affect the private sector from any requirement that the State reimburse local government for higher levels of service which may be required by the Legislature at any time in the future. Assemblyman Steve Peace has introduced AB 451 apparently in an effort to rectify this Supreme Court decision. AB 451 defines a '.'higher level of service" as any of the following: 1 . Any statute or executive order which adds a new requirement to an existing optional program or service if the local agency has noreasonable alternative other than to continue the optional program or service. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE; ff"o6 z Z&X. X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S)' ACTION OF BOARD ON February 24, 1987 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER c 1 VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT! AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator FEB 2 4 1987 CC: County Counsel ATTESTED County Auditor PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Assembl vman Steve Peace SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Larry Naake, CSAC Director Kathy Snodgrass , Jackson/Barish BY ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 Page 2 2. Any statute or executive order which removes an option previously available to the local agency thereby increasing program or service levels. 3 . Any statute or executive order which prohibits a specific activity which results in the local agency using a more costly alternative to provide a mandated program or service. 4 . Any statute or executive order which requires that an existing program or service be provided in a shorter period of time, thereby increasing the costs of that program. 5. Any statute or executive order which implements or interprets a statute or amendment adopted or enacted pursuant to the approval of a statewide ballot measure by the voters and by that implementation or interpretation increases program or service levels above the levels required by that ballot measure. 6 . Any statute or executive order which implements or interprets a federal statute or regulation and by that implementation or interpretation increases program or service levels above the levels required by that federal statute or regulation. In that AB 451 clarifies the definition of a "higher level of service" in a way which will require a more narrow interpretation of the circumstances under which the Legislature does not have to reimburse local agencies for the cost of the higher level of service, we believe the bill deserves the support of the Board of Supervisors and, therefore, recommend that the Board support AB 451.