Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11041986 - 2.5 CONTRA COM 0oUN1Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Phil Batchelor, county Administrator DATE: November 4, 1986 SUB=: Sale of Option to Purchase Easement to Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority SpB=C PJ)2 sr(s) OR REoa n arr(s) & BAc nmwm AND Jusrmcmw . 1. Reoamended. Action: The Board of Supervisors as the governing body of the contra. Costa county Flood Control and Water conservation District. A. APPFUM the sale of an Option to Purchase a Sanitary Sewer easement to Tri- Valley Wastewater Authority, along portions of the Walnut Creek Channel right of way owned by the District and determined to be surplus. B. AUn-JORIM the Public Works Director to sign the Option to Purchase agreement with the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority dated November 4, 1986. C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 25526.6 FIND that the conveyance is in the public interest and that the interest conveyed will not substantially conflict or interfere with the use of the property by the District. D. FIND that the sale of the Option will not have a significant effect on the environment and that it has been determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under state CES Guidelines, Section 15112. The Community Development Director is CKWERED to file a Notice of Exemption with the county Clerk. The requirements of Government Code Section 65402 have previously been met. 2. financial liinact: The District will receive $50,000 for the sale of the Option. If the Option is exercised, the District will receive $400,000 for the sale of the easement. 3. Rmsons for Recom nidations: To further a spirit of cooperation between public agencies and to raise funds necessary to improve the Walnut Creek Channel right of way corridor. 4. BacJarLuarrd: Alameda County, the Dublin-San Ramon Services District and the City of Pleasanton have formed a joint powers agency to provide sewer treatment for their jurisdiction which is currently in a crisis situation, having reached their treatment capacity. They need a route to the Bay for their treated effluent. S. Consequences of Negative Action: The Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority will have to find another more costly method of routing their treated effluent. A spirit of public Agency cooperation will not be established. Continued on Attadment: yes Signature: Reocsmvi4ation of County Administrator Reconmiendation o Board Committee _ Approve Other Signature(s) Action of Board on Approved as reooamended -Other �-- Before approving, the Board AMENDED the "Option" to provide that the construction could not begin until all the required permits have been secured and DIRECTED the Director of Community Development to monitor and report to the Board on the EIR process and REFERRED the EIR to the Board's Water Committee for review. Supervisor Fanden voted "no" because she was not satisfied that specific information is available to know what the impacts would be if the option is implemented. Vote of Supervisors Unanimous (Absent ) I EMM Y CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE Ayes:112 ZQf=Noes: -�7- AND CUM= COPY OF AN ACTION TARN Absent: __ Abstain: AND EDnmm) ON THE mmms OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DAZE SHOW. AZTESI'ID -�4. /9,�- PHIL BAT MIM, Clerk of the Board bo:a4fc.t11 of Supervisors arra C mmty Administrator Orig. Div: Public Works (P,/P) cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller P. W. Accounting COMM COSI, Cwxrx BQARD OF SUPERVISORS 70: Board of Supervisors FRCNi: Phil Batchelor, County Addnistrator DAZE: November 4, 1986 SUBJECP: Sale of Option to Purchase Easement to Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority SPECIFIC RELL=(S) CR 1DATICN(S) & BACiOUM AND JUSTUIC1MCN 1. paaa mended Action: A. APPROVE the sale of an Option to Purchase a Sanitary Sewer easement to Tri- Valley Wastewater Authority, along portions of the former Southern Pacific Railroad right of way owned by the County and determined to be surplus. B. AUMURTZE the County Administrator to sign the Option to Purchase agreement with the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority dated November 4, 1986. C. Pursuant to Goverrm mt Code Section 25526.6 FM that the conveyance is in the public interest and that the interest conveyed will not substantially conflict or interfere with the use of the property by the County. D. FIND that the sale of the Option will not have a significant effect on the environment and that it has been determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under state CEQA Guidelines, Section 15112. The Cmmunity Development Director is CPIEM) to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. The requirements of Government Code Section 65402 have previously been met. 2. Financial Impact: Zhe County will receive $133,500 for the sale of the option. If the Option is exercised, the County will receive $5,320,000 for the sale of the easement. 3. Reasons for ReoUMmeO(iaticns: Zb further a spirit of cooperation between public agencies and to raise funds necessary to develop the former Southern Pacific right of way corridor. 4. Backmpund: Alameda County, the Dublin-San Ramon Services District and the City of Pleasanton have formed a joint powers agency to provide sewer treatment for their jurisdiction which is currently in a crisis situation, having reached their treatment capacity. They need a route to the Bay for their treated effluent. 5. Conseaueruoe, of Negative Ackion: The Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority will have to find another more costly method of routing their treated effluent. A spirit of public Agency cooperation will not be established. c Continued on Attachment: yes Signature: Recoatnendati.on of County Administrator Reconnendation of Board Committee _ Approve Other Signature(s) Action of Board on Approved as recommended Other Before approving, the Board AMENDED the "Option" to provide that the construction could not begin until all the required permits have been secured and DIRECTED the Director of Community Development to monitor and report to the Board on the EIR process and REFERRED the EIR to the Board's Water Committee for review. Supervisor Fanden voted "no" because she was not satisfied that specific information is available to know what the impacts would be if the option is implemented. Vote of Supervisors- Unanimous (Absent ) I HEREBY CERTM THAT THIS IS A TRUE Ayes: ra�:r Noes: �_ . AND CC UMar CDPY OF AN ACTION Tmw Absent: Abstain: AND ENTERED CN THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPEMrLmRS ON THE DATE SEI N. ATTESTED 4 i_YJ ic PHII, BATCII IMi Clerk of the Board DD:pg of Supervisors and County Administrator ' bo:a4tri.tll BYEEPM Orig. Div: Public Works (P/P) ac: County Administrator Auditor-Controller P. W. Accounting