Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02072023 - BOS Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 KAREN MITCHOFF, CHAIR, 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board meeting will be accessible in-person, via television, and via live-streaming to all members of the public. Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27, ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32, and can be seen live online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. Persons who wish to address the board during public comment or with respect to an item on the agenda may comment in person or may call in during the meeting by dialing 888-278-0254 followed by the access code 843298#. A caller should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item, by pushing "#2" on their phone. Access via Zoom is also available using the following link: https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/87344719204 . Those participating via Zoom should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. To provide contact information, please contact Clerk of the Board at clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us or call 925-655-2000. Meetings of the Board are closed-captioned in real time. Public comment generally will be limited to two minutes. Your patience is appreciated. A Spanish language interpreter is available to assist Spanish-speaking callers. A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair. Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES February 7, 2023            9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) 1. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (Gov. Code, § 54957) Title: County Counsel C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Joseph Malott v. City of Walnut Creek, et al., United States District Court, Northern District of California Case No. 3:21-cv-1674 SK 1. D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(2): [One potential case.] Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator Thomas Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel  Speaker: No Name Given. There were no announcements from Closed Session.   1. Union Pacific Railroad Claims for Refund.     Thought of the Day- "Mental illness does not discriminate; it can affect anyone regardless of your age, gender, geography, income, social status, race/ethnicity, religion/spirituality, sexual orientation, background or other aspect of cultural identity. Our education programs ensure that families, individuals and educators get the support and information they need." ~NAMI Contra Costa   CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.115 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each)   PRESENTATION proclaiming February 12-18, 2023 as African American Mental Health Awareness Week, and February 15th as Miles Hall Day of Remembrance and March 8th as Tyrell Wilson Day of Remembrance. (Supervisors Gioia and Glover)    Speakers: Gigi Crowder, NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness); Chantal Owens, Antioch Urban Ministries; Damon Owens, Genesis Church; Tawn Hall; Barbara Howard, 40 Voices Campaign; Alfonso Edwards, Antioch; Douglas Dunn; Nancy Balcerek, NAMI; Wanda Johnson; Tiffany Wang, NAMI; Shelly Ji, NAMI; Akili Nuez-Muon; Kenneth Robinson;Ogie Strogatz; No Name Given; Stephanie; No Name Given; Daniel.   PRESENTATION proclaiming February 2023 as Civil Grand Jury Awareness Month. (Laura Griffin, Vice President Civil Grand Jurors Association)   DISCUSSION ITEMS   D.1 HEARING to consider approving the Loreto Bay Estates Project, a 15-unit residential development in the Bay Point area, including approving a rezoning ordinance and development plan, adopting a mitigated negative declaration for the project, and related actions, as recommended by the County Planning Commission. (Discovery Builders, Applicant; Jose and Monica Luis, Owners) (Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.2 HEARING on the itemized costs of abatement for property located at 549 Grove Ave., Richmond, in unincorporated Contra Costa County, California (Elizabeth Smith, Owner). (Jason Crapo, Conservation and Development Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.3 HEARING on the itemized costs of abatement for property located at 460 Memory Lane, Oakley, in unincorporated Contra Costa County, California. (Charles W. Surges, Owner) (Jason Crapo, Conservation and Development Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.4 CONSIDER accepting report on new Employment and Human Services Department public information sharing tools. (Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.5 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2023/6 approving the Side Letter between the County of Contra Costa and the District Attorney Investigators' Association providing for MOU extension, wages, and other benefits. (David Sanford, Chief of Labor Relations)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.6 CONSIDER authorizing the Board of Supervisors, in all its capacities, and all County advisory boards, committees, and commissions to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) through February 28, 2023, make related findings, receive an update on teleconference meeting procedures that begin March 1, 2023, provide direction to staff on conducting hybrid meetings of County advisory boards, committees, and commissions that allow the public to attend remotely and in person, and take related actions. (Thomas Geiger, County Counsel)       Speakers: Name Not Given; Renee, Chair, Economic Opportunity Council; Stephanie; No Name Given. ADOPTED the recommendations as presented; and DIRECTED the County Administrator's Office to work with the Clerk of the Board's office to identify additional common meeting locations for county commissions to hold hybrid meetings including the libraries.   D. 7 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    The Board moved items C.17, C.19, C.20 from the consent calendar to allow for discussion and subsequently adopted them as presented.   D. 8 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)    Liz Ritchie made a general statement on all of the consent items, regarding anything to do with the health department, health services, and any associated grants or funding that would be going out to any nonprofits that are associated: That the funding that takes into account anything to do with covid or the vaccines be reexamined and ensured that also not going to be continued funding for vaccinations as they have been now unmandated; No Name Given expressed an interest in the guidelines used to place items under the consent category of the agenda, and expressed concern with procedures and secrecy rules of grand juries; Caller 6770 spoke of information put forth by Project Veritas claiming the Pfizer Inc. is making new diseases in order to sell new vaccines and claimed fraud in vaccine trials performance. He noted that data on Pfizer childhood vaccine adverse reactions was made available last week. He feels that the weblinked material to a documentary for school children, worked on by Governor Newsom's wife is pornographic and alludes to some unknown plans Ms. Newsom has against Harvey Weinstein. He further said the China-Ukraine connection has consequences for all there should be realization of the military's involvement in a vaccine genocide. Written material recevied from Lisa Kirk, Contra Costa Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and Irina Dyatlovskaya regarding dogs in county animal shelters scheduled to be euthanized if not adopted right away (attached).   D. 9 CONSIDER reports of Board members.    Chair Gioia attended the California Executive Committee (CSAC) meeting in San Diego last week, focusing on creation of a task force of supervisors and staff of counties from around the state, including our chief probation officer, regarding solutions for the unhoused; Supervisor Andersen provided a brief update on her work with the National Association of Counties (NACO) on the Familiar Faces initiative, am method that allows staff to identify familiar faces that rotate through the jails and homeless shelters and mostly regarding the sharing of data. County Probation has been working closely with county Health Services on two prongs: One to have strict data where we identify what are the issues we are facing and not by identifying individuals so we can have better preventive practices particularly in probation, and the other is really what we are doing with CalAim, addressing the individuals. This is a great collaborative effort we have been having through health, through probation, a yearlong process we continue to participate with other counties across the country in finding best practices to be able to share the data we can without violating hipaa or other privacy concerns.   ADJOURN in memory of Darlene Smith former Contra Costa County Probation Department employee and Janet Abelson former El Cerrito Mayor and Councilmember   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/23 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close specific portions of Lillian Street, and all of 7th Avenue and Del Mar Circle, from February 8, 2023 through April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of an infrastructure renewal project, including the replacement of water main, service transfers, hydrants and connections, Crockett area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/24 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close specific portions of Grizzly Peak Boulevard and Lake Drive, and all of Plateau Drive, from February 8, 2023 through April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of a water main infrastructure renewal project, Kensington area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 3 ACCEPT the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Acquisition Acceptances dated July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, approved by the Public Works Director as submitted, Alamo, Brentwood, Byron, Clayton, and San Pablo areas. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Traffic Resolution No. 2023/4527 to prohibit stopping, standing, or parking at all times except for those vehicles of individuals with disabilities (blue curb) on a portion of Wanda Street, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Crockett area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/38 to APPROVE the San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path Project; DETERMINE that the activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project and submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the total amount of $120,000, for fiscal year 2023/2024, Walnut Creek area. (8% Transportation Development Act Funds, 63% City of Walnut Creek Funds, 29% Central County Area of Benefit Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/39 to APPROVE the Kevin Drive Bike Lanes Project; DETERMINE that the activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project and submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the total amount of $120,000, for fiscal year 2023/2024, Bay Point area. (31% Transportation Development Act Funds, 69% Local Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C. 7 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a maintenance agreement with 3483 Golden Gate Way, LLC, to accept maintenance responsibilities for a portion of Lafayette Creek, in Zone 3B, Lafayette area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 8 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with KJELDSEN, SINNOCK & NEUDECK, INC., effective February 7, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $620,000 to a new payment limit of $3,013,020 for construction management and biological monitoring services, with no change to the term, Martinez area. (100% Flood Control Zone 3B Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 9 RECEIVE supplemental public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final in 2022, through January 3, 2023.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 10 DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility, Sprint Communications Company LP, and Sprint Spectrum LP in the total amount of $1,261,117.75, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2019/20.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp, and AT&T Mobility LLC in the total amount of $1,453,842.45, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2020/21.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum LP, and CenturyLink Communications LLC in the total amount of $496,899.02, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2021/22.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 13 DENY the claims filed by Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Pacific Bell, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile West LLC, and CenturyLink Communications LLC in the total amount of $1,511,730.83, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2022/23.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 DENY the claim for refund of property taxes filed by Chung Jin Park for fiscal years 2017/18 through 2022/23.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 DENY claims filed by AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, Ashkan Ghafouri, Pei-Yu Hu, Charles H. Joe, Dianne Liebert, Pacific Bell, Chung Jin Park, Thelma Perez, Katrina Rasters, Sprint Communication, Co., LP, Sprint Spectrum LP, T-Mobile West LLC, and Eliana Serrano & Hilel Vargas.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C. 16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/19 recognizing Allison Knapp for her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Public Works Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 17 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/26 in support of human rights in Iran, including immediate cessation of Human Rights abuses on the Demonstrators in Iran and the immediate release of Political Prisoners and a Free Secular Democratic Republic of Iran, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       Speakers: Nazie Shakerin, Parandia Banifatemi from the Iranian American Community of Contra Costa; Jale, Berkeley; Bajan Sartipi; Nazanin Shekerin. Written commentary provided by Xuezhn Zhau; Zaria Saniee; Autreen Golzar; Fareshteh Mofidi; Dorie Ofojh;Avideh J. Sharifi; Reza Jannatpour; Reza Golzar; Venous Jafari; Faran Dadafanin; Jannaz Sharifi; Ladan Elahi; Mimi Hakani; Losat Bowlati; Elhan Senemar; Fariba Esmarli; Roshanak Rahimi; Goity; Azara Ansari; Mehri Deghan; Shideh Jashayod; Farhad Shokouh; Kiana Shokouh; Nazanin Shakerin; Peyman Moshrofi (attached).    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 18 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/32 recognizing Shawn Coffman for her 20 years of service to Contra Costa Animal Services Department, as recommended by the Animal Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 19 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/40 proclaiming February 12-18, 2023 as African American Mental Health Awareness Week, and February 15th as Miles Hall Day of Remembrance and March 8th as Tyrell Wilson Day of Remembrance, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 20 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/43 honoring the Lunar New Year Celebrations in Contra Costa County, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       Speaker: No Name Given.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/47 proclaiming February 2023 as Civil Grand Jury Awareness Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 22 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/49 recognizing the Monument Crisis Center for its 20 years of service to our community, as recommended by Supervisor Carlson.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Hearing Dates   C. 23 RECEIVE the 2022-2023 property tax administrative cost recovery report of the Auditor-Controller, FIX    C. 23 RECEIVE the 2022-2023 property tax administrative cost recovery report of the Auditor-Controller, FIX February 28, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the determination of property tax administrative costs, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to notify affected local jurisdictions of the public hearing and to prepare and publish the required legal notice and make supporting documentation available for public inspection, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C. 24 REAPPOINT Marilyn Cachola Lucey, resident of Alamo, to the District II Seat on the Contra Costa Commission for Women for a term ending February 28, 2027, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 APPOINT Skyelar Cribbs to the District 3, Seat 2 on the Mental Health Commission for a term ending June 30, 2025, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 REAPPOINT Bob Mankin to the Appointee 2 seat on the Discovery Bay P-6 Citizen Advisory Committee for a term ending December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 ACCEPT the resignation of David Cruise, DECLARE vacant the District 3 Seat 2 on the Measure X Community Advisory Board, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 ACCEPT the resignation of Sandro Trujillo, DECLARE vacant the District 3 Alternate Seat on the Measure X Community Advisory Board, and DIRECT the of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 APPOINT Vincent Salimi to the District 1 Seat on the Contra Costa County Aviation Advisory Committee to complete the current term ending February 28, 2023 and to a new term ending February 28, 2026 as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 REAPPOINT William Lipsin to the Appointee 1 Seat on the County Service Area P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee for a term ending December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover    C. 31 ASSIGN the Diablo Municipal Advisory Council Seats as follows: Kathy Urbelis, President; Matthew Cox Vice President and Roads; Christine Chartier, Community Liaison; Greg Lorrenz, Finance; Jerry Slavonia, Security, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 REAPPOINT Thomas Hansen to the Crockett Member Seat on the Western Contra Costa Transit Authority Board of Directors for a term ending January 1, 2025, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 REAPPOINT Daniel Pellegrini to the District V seat on the Fish & Wildlife Committee for a term ending February 28, 2027, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 REAPPOINT Bruce Ohlson to the District V Seat on the Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 REAPPOINT Christopher E. Baker to the District V Representative seat on the Aviation Advisory Committee for a term ending February 28, 2026, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 APPOINT Joshua McMurray to the B10 Public Managers' Association Representative seat and Lance Maples to the C5 Public Provider Field Paramedic Representative seat on the Emergency Medical Care Committee for terms ending September 30, 2024, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C. 37 Employment and Human Services Department (0583): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. 005040 authorizing revenue and expenditure adjustments of $1,269,407 in the Employment and Human Services Department’s Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 County Administrator (0003): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No. 5035 authorizing new revenue in the amount of $130,125 in fund balance and appropriating it for the purchase of replacement video production system and shared media server in the Office of Communications & Media/CCTV (1225). (100% PEG Funding)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations Intergovernmental Relations   C. 39 APPOINT Supervisor Ken Carlson as the Board of Supervisors representative and Dr. Sara Levin as County Health Services Department representative to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Task Force for Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan implementation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to update the Board's Master Resolution for Board Committee appointments, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C. 40 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26102 to add three Social Casework Assistant (represented) positions and cancel one Eligibility Worker I (represented), one Clerk-Experienced Level (represented), and one Children’s Clerical Specialist (represented) positions in the Children and Family Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department. (68% State, 28% Federal, 4% County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26079 to cancel one Information Systems Specialist III (represented) position and add one Information Systems Programmer and Analyst II (represented) position in the Library Department. (100% Library Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 42 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26088 to add one Account Clerk – Experienced Level (represented) position, add one Secretary - Advanced Level (represented) position and cancel one Network Administrator – I (represented) position in the Conservation and Development Department. (100% Land Development Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26101 to reassign one Account Clerk – Advanced Level (represented) position, one Accounting Technician (represented) position and incumbent, one Accountant I (represented) position and incumbent, four Accountant III (represented) positions and incumbents, one Administrative Services Assistant III (represented) position, and one Departmental Fiscal Officer (unrepresented) position and incumbent from the Community Services Bureau to the Administrative Services Bureau in the Employment and Human Services Department. (cost neutral)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26097 to add one Planner and Evaluator – Level B (represented) position and cancel one vacant Administrative Services Assistant III (represented) position in the District Attorney's Office. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26107 to increase the hours of one Primary Care Provider - Exempt (represented) position and its incumbent from 31/40 to 35/40 in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26112 to decrease the hours of two Primary Care Provider - Exempt (represented) positions from 35/40 to 31/40 and from 40/40 to 31/40 in the Health Services Department. (Cost savings, 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26116 to add 232 positions in varied represented classifications in the Health Services Department. (100% Health Services Department revenues, no General Fund impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26050 to establish the classification of Information Security Specialist (LWSC) (represented) and add one Information Security Specialist position in the Department of Information Technology. (100% User Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Leases   C. 49 ACCEPT the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Delegation of Leases and Licenses dated July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C. 50 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/18 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute contract amendment with the California Department of Aging to accept a funding increase in the amount of $3,788 to a new agreement amount not to exceed $1,023,288 for Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program for the period July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. (71% State, 29% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Health Care Services, for continued participation in the County-Based Medi-Cal Administrative Activities Program and to receive reimbursement for these services effective July 1, 2021 and continuing until terminated by either party with 30-day advanced notice. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/31 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant    C. 52 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/31 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety in an initial amount of $450,000 for the Sheriff's Forensic Services Unit to purchase new updated instrumentation for the blood alcohol program beginning October 1, 2023 to the end of the grant period. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of Pittsburg, including mutual indemnification, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to provide police dispatching services for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2027. (100% City of Pittsburg)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a revenue contract amendment with the California Department of Education to accept a funding increase of $5,974,470 with a new payment limit of $22,398,601 for state preschool services for the term July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Mt. Diablo Unified School District, to pay the County an amount up to $30,000 for the implementation and evaluation of Public Health Curriculum in the Patient Care Pathways program at College Park High School, Mt. Diablo High School, and Ygnacio Valley High School for the period February 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a grant amendment with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc., to increase the amount payable to the County by $27,061 to a new amount not to exceed $164,874 for participation in the California Emerging Infections Program with no change in the term September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in an amount up to $40,000 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, for the provision of safe walking and biking education for Contra Costa County residents under the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Project for the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, and ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/33 as required for grant submission to the MTC. ($23,232 County match, budgeted)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant extension from the State of California Health and Human Services Agency, California Department of Public Health, to extend the termination date to May 31, 2024 with no change in the original amount payable to the County of up to $895,271 for the California Equitable Recovery Initiative to address COVID-19 health disparities among populations at high-risk and underserved. (No county match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept California    C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept California Office of Traffic Safety Grant funds in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program for a countywide Vision Zero roadway safety education campaign for the period October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept on behalf of the County, a grant award from the State of California Department of Justice for the Tobacco Grant Program, in an amount not to exceed $442,692 for the period December 1, 2022 through July 30, 2025. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant award from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration, to increase the amount payable to the County by $13,066 to a new amount payable of $75,934 effective January 18, 2023, for the Ryan White, Part C, HIV Early Intervention Services working to reduce the transmission of HIV, improve access to health care, and enhance the quality of life for those with HIV in West Contra Costa County with no change in the original term through April 30, 2023. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls to apply for and the Contra Costa County Administrator, or designee, to accept on behalf of the Commission, a grant in the amount of $35,000 from the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls to provide additional support for the Commission and services to the women and girls of Contra Costa County for the period April 3, 2023 through March 31, 2024.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to apply for and accept grant funding not to exceed $750,000 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute an amended subcontract agreement, effective December 31, 2022, with the Association of Bay Area Governments, to extend the term through December 31, 2023 and increase the payment limit from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to the County by $284,570 to a new payment limit of $1,146,680 to support marketing, education, and outreach for energy efficiency programs. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept a renewal grant in the amount of $150,000 on behalf of the Contra Costa Alliance to End Abuse from the Blue Shield of California Foundation grant for the “Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence Project” for the period April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C. 66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Applied Medical Distribution Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of endomechanical surgical supplies and instruments for the Operating Room at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center for the period February 1, 2023, through March 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Siri Sunderi Cheng, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,650,000 to provide otolaryngology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and health centers for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC, effective January 21, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $1,197,192 to a new payment limit of $2,075,995, and extend the term through January 21, 2026 for additional software licensing, support and services. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with DVPediatric Inc. (dba Diablo Valley Pediatrics), formerly doing business as Diablo Valley Pediatric Medical Group, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $6,000,000 to provide pediatric primary care services for Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2026. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Beckman Coulter, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $250,000 for the purchase of reagents and supplies for the Iricell 2000 urinalysis device utilized at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), for the period March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order with Victory Supply in an amount not to exceed $500,000 to purchase clothing, bedding & linen items as required for inmates for the West County, Martinez and Marsh Creek detention facilities for the period of December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with La    C. 72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with La Clinica De La Raza, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $943,285 to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III, 17% County General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lifelong Medical Care, in an amount not to exceed $1,403,653 to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III, 17% County General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Brighter Beginnings, in an amount not to exceed $653,082 to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III, 17% County General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Robert Liebig, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $2,610,000 to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Applied Health Corp., in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to provide chiropractic and acupuncture services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Positive and Vigilant Healthcare, Inc. (dba Alhambra Convalescent Hospital), effective February 1, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $475,000 to a new payment limit of $625,000 with no change in the term April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024 to provide additional skilled nursing facility services for Contra Costa Health Plan members. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 78 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Vale Operating Company, LP (dba Vale Healthcare Center), to extend the term through April 30, 2024, with no change in the payment limit of $1,310,000, to provide ongoing skilled nursing facility services for Contra Costa Health Plan members. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 79 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment    C. 79 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Richmond Post Acute Care, LLC, effective February 1, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $1,200,000 to a new payment limit of $1,600,000 with no change in the term April 1, 2022 through March 31, 2024 to provide additional skilled nursing facility services for Contra Costa Health Plan members. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), to extend the term through July 31, 2024 for on-call roofing and exterior waterproofing services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 81 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Flock Group, Inc., on behalf of the Office of the Sheriff, effective February 7, 2023, through February 6, 2024, in an amount not to exceed $30,000 for the acquisition and installation of automatic license plate reader cameras and the provision of a hosted software system for the Bay Point area . (100% Keller Canyon Mitigation Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 82 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Mark Scott Construction, Inc., to extend the term through August 31, 2024 for on-call maintenance, repair, and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 83 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, the Participating Addendum and blanket purchase order with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LP, in an amount not to exceed $3,100,000 for cleaning supplies, equipment, and equipment repair-related services for use by all County Departments during the period from February 7, 2023 through October 31, 2025, Countywide. (100% User Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 84 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with La Roza Construction, Inc., to extend the term through August 31, 2024 for on-call maintenance, repair and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 85 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Aztec Consultants, to extend the term through August 31, 2024 for on-call maintenance, repair and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 86 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Center for Applied Behavior Analysis LLC, in an amount not to exceed $600,000 to provide behavioral health treatment – applied behavioral analysis services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2025. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 87 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of California, P.A., in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 to provide teleradiology services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 88 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation, in an amount not to exceed $190,000 to provide professional consultation services to the Health Services Director with regard to the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Health Centers for the period October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 89 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Edward Y. Tang M.D., Inc., to extend the termination date from February 28, 2023 to May 31, 2023, with no change in the payment limit of $1,230,000, to continue providing orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 90 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Department, a purchase order with Trace3 in an amount not to exceed $65,324 for the purchase of PagerDuty, Inc. software licenses and support for the period from August 29, 2020 through August 30, 2023. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 91 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Christian Eisert, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,320,000 to provide otolaryngology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and health centers for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 92 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Jaison James, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 to provide orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 93 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lee A. Shratter, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,860,000 to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 94 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to pay $82,967 to US Foods, Inc. for the purchase of all food categories, chemicals, paper products, kitchen supplies and equipment for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center during the period of July 12, 2022, through December 29, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 95 APPROVE the Regional Medical Center Cooling Towers Replacement Project, DETERMINE that the activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project, Martinez area. (100% Enterprise I Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 96 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE, under a grant deed of development rights held by the County, Dish Wireless to collocate a wireless telecommunication facility on a PG&E transmission tower located on Assessor’s Parcel No. 203-760-036, near the Eagle Nest Lane/Eagle Nest Place intersection; and MAKE related findings under the California Environmental Quality Act, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director, Danville/Blackhawk area. (100% applicant funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 97 ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report submitted by the Council on Homelessness, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 98 ACCEPT the Needle Exchange Update report from the Public Health Division of the Health Services Department, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. (No fiscal impact)       Speaker: Caller 6770.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 99 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District, including the List of Designated Positions, as recommended by County Counsel.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.100 ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan, as recommended by the Sustainability Commission.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE amended list of designated positions for the Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa    C.101 APPROVE amended list of designated positions for the Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, as recommended by County Counsel.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.102 ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report from the Economic Opportunity Council Advisory Board, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.103 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract with YES Nature to Neighborhoods, a private non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $150,000, for the non-construction design costs related to the renovation and expansion of permanent office space located at 3029 MacDonald Avenue, Richmond, for the period January 1, 2023 through August 31, 2025, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. (100% Livable Communities Trust Fund, District I share)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.104 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller or designee, to pay $51,508 to Cintas Corporation for janitorial supplies, parts, uniforms, minor equipment, standard rental products used for cleaning; cubicle and shower curtains; and repair and labor services provided to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers during the period of January 4, 2022 through March 29, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.105 ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report from the Commission for Women and Girls, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.106 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with University of South Florida for Its College of Public Health, to provide supervised field instruction to public health students at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.107 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/44 to Approve and Authorize the Treasurer-Tax Collector, or designee, to provide information about the Easy Smart Pay Program as an option for homeowners to pay Secured Property Taxes in monthly installments, as recommended by the Treasurer-Tax Collector.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.108 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to    C.108 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to purchase 150 Starbucks gift cards each with a $10 value totaling $1,500, 25 Jamba Juice gift cards each with a $10 value totaling $250, and 25 Panera gift cards each with a $10 value totaling $250, for a total purchase amount not to exceed $2,000 for the Tobacco Prevention Program to distribute to community members who participate in completing a population intercept survey from September 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023. (100% California Department of Public Health Local Lead Agencies Grant)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.109 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Department, up to 125 Amazon gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $3,125, 63 Walmart gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $1,575, and 62 Target gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $1,550, for a total amount not to exceed $6,250 to support Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) Medi-Cal members participation on the CCHP Community Advisory Committee and focus groups, interviews, surveys, and listening sessions as required by CCHP’s contract with the California Department of Health Care Services for the period February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. (100% California Department of Health Care Services)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.110 DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.111 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing Committee and the Health Services Director, and as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.112 RECEIVE 2022 Annual Report submitted by the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.113 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the University of Phoenix, to provide supervised field instruction to nursing students in the County’s Public Health Division for the period March 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.114 ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/45 calling and noticing election of Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board of Trustees Members No. 3 (general), 7 (safety), and 7 Alternate (safety), as recommended by the County Administrator. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.115 TERMINATE, effective February 28, 2023, the local emergency throughout Contra Costa County proclaimed by the Board of Supervisors on March 10, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, consistent with the end of the statewide state of emergency, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board before the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 655-2000. Anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda may contact the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California. Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000 or using the County's on line subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be viewed: www.contracosta.ca.gov DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, members of the Board of Supervisors are disqualified and not able to participate in any agenda item involving contracts (other than competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), franchises, discretionary land use permits and other entitlements if the Board member received, since January 1, 2023, more than $250 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant who actively supports or opposes the County’s decision on the agenda item. Members of the Board of Supervisors who have received, and applicants, contractors or their agents who have made, campaign contributions totaling more than $250 to a Board member since January 1, 2023, are required to disclose that fact for the official record of the subject proceeding. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign contribution and identify the recipient Board member, and may be made either in writing to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors before the subject hearing or by verbal disclosure at the time of the hearing. STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee • BUILDING AMERICK Clerk, Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County 1025 Escobar Street 1st Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Sir or Madam: April 27, 2022 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT RE QUESTED AND EMAIL clerkoftheboard@ cccounty.us This correspondence constitutes claims for refund of a portion of the unitary property tax payments Union Pacific Railroad Company made to the County for the following tax years: 2018-2019 Tax Year 2019-2020 Tax Year 2020-2021 Tax Year 2021-2022 Tax Year We are making these claims pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 5, Article 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, Cal. Rev. & Tax.§§ 5096 et seq. and assert that a portion of Union Pacific's 2018-2022 tax payments should be refunded for the reasons set forth in Exhibit A to this correspondence. Union Pacific is seeking refunds of the following amounts, with interest: Tax Year Refund Amount Date Paid 2018-2019 $92,941.89, plus interest 3111/19 2019-2020 $102,617.07, plus interest 3/11/20 2020-2021 $140,088.53, plus interest 3/11/21 2021-2022 $152,679 .18, plus interest 3/11122 Total Amount of Refund: $488,326.67, plus interest We are herewith filing these refund claims, along with the attached statement of grounds, tax bill, and proof of payment, with the Board of Supervisors of the County. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 1400 Douglas Street, Stop 1640 Omaha, Nebraska 68179-1650 Robert A . Morgan General Director -Property Tax I certify under penalty of perjury that I have the authority to make this claim on behalf of Union Pacific, and that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge based on the records of the company. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me directly at ( 402) 544-4872 or ramorgan@up.com. Sincerely, t:rfl.-1-?~f--- Robert A. Morgan General Director -Property Tax Encl. [c'~'~~~ -. . .. ·-· -·· .. .. . ... -·~•~, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA I• !-=!~!~ FOR ~~F _U~D OF}~X_PAYMENT(S) Claimant's Name: Last: n/a Mailing A.ddress: State: Nebraska First: Union Pacific Railroad Co. 1400Dou g lasStce~t1 Sto p 1640 ?ip: 68179-:1640 City: .Qrn'!ha .,., -....... ._ .. ..,,..---~--............ Contact No.; uo~ ---~'::LY_-'-1 l? l::L Account Number: 8..43 ..o-· _____ _ Prop~rty Address: _unitary Pro perty in SBE TRA 000-002~ City~ ...... N.._/A......,__ __ ~ Zip: N/A · ~~=--..~:z:l!f.~~""' .-·--~--.-...~-~=$-..~~:;_:.:=·· ·· ~~~"""~· --.-.·-\ ... ~·~,....~~.:;.;~_-.:: ....... :~_: ... ~,,;.-......... ;::· ·%4-·--·a-:t,;:~-~~ ~, --·~, ..... _ ... .,.,, .. _" ... -u s~-.~m~·~·'-"f· ·'"""~-................. ~ ......... tin. m_ .,,.+J&L 'illi:ii;_-... r ,, i In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 5 1 Article J, of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (commencing with Section 5096), I am (we are) herewith filing this dairn with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, and ask that a refund of taxes and/or penalties, be made fqr th,e foll9wing amounts: ·FiscC1J Vear(s) Refund is Claimed 'Date(s) Taxes Paid Amount of Tax Claim Amount of·. total Amount Penalty Claim I (we) clai'm that the whole assessment (part of the assessment) for the year(s) as shown is (are) void for the following reasons (use attachments if necessary): S~,~ At.tc~_chgq_ Exhi~!t_ A. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct; that the taxes and/or penalties sought to be refunded were paid within four years prior to the filing of this claim; that the amounts herein claimed are correct; and no part thereof has been refunded to the claimant or to any other person for Claimant's benefit; and iht:ting on behalf of a legal entity, I am duly authorized to act on behalf and that the title shown below is true and correct. Claimant1 s Name: Last: n/a Mailing A.ddress: State: Nebrask a. First: Union Pacific Railroad Co. l 400J)oug1_as .Street,StQ p 1640 fip: 681 Z9-:l640 City: .Omaha·' --. .-.. -....,_-~-......--­ Contact No.:~~=-~-~~ ·~4~ 12:- Account Number: g_43 _. _____ _ PropGrty Address: Unitarv Pro perty in SBE TRA 000-002_ City:. _N ..... /A ___ _ Zip: N/A · .~~~~,.~~':ff.~~"'<-. ,__.,. .. -_. ... ~..;;;,·· ...... ,;:i:a:" .... """"'tJ--•.,.-·_ ....... ,_ ~-,......:.:.. .... ..;,,.: ·~-~, 1 ="'""·--..·~:~.._.,_777""''~"'""":"":-"--· 22=:w .... ...:, ... _ .. ~-a""K~~~~ ....... """ .J«;,·,. ..... ms;~. " I In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 51 Article .J, of the California Revenue and :raxation Code (commencing with Section 5096), I am (we are) ~erewith filing this c!airn with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, and asl< that a refund of taxes and/or penalties be made fo,r the following amounts: -FiscaJ Vear(s) 'Date(s) Taxes Amount of Amount of Total Arnount Refu,nd is Paid Tax Claim . Penalty Claim ; Claimed ---~ ~~·· , .. , ..... ----·-············ ·············-···-·- 1ll t~\ b 11. or 90ICi -~ ol l\ l~D l ~~ ls, l ·f .,.lYj ..... ~-,_. --.-·.·-") .... ,_;._~ --· -c..rn. __ -___ : __ -.. ~-~-; ~;le) -~\ 3/\\ /'L) ~ ) L\D.) O~~. S?, ~ l4u 0~~.~3 -···· .,__ ,.,~ ' ~~\ -~;>-2>/ l l l-z-'2-~ \ ;d ) \e1'1. li ~ \9, (o 1'l. \~ I (we) claim that the whole assessment (part of the assessment) for the year(s) as shown is (are) void for the following reasons (use attachments if necessary): .See,8}.t9f.hedExhibit A. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct; that the taxes and/or penalties sought to be refundE!d were paid within four years prior to the fillng of this claim; that the amounts herein claimed are correct; and no part thereof has been refunded to the claimant or to any other person for Claimant's benefit; and ifiJtting on behalf of a 1.egal entity, I am duly authorized to act on behalf and thatthe title shown below is true and ·correct. · Date:.~.· cl~r k-- Union Pacific Railroad Company Refund Claim Form Exhibit A Statement of Grounds for the Refund Claim Union Pacific seeks a refund of a portion of the property taxes it has paid to the County on the grounds that portion was illegally levied and collected in violation of federal and state law. The County has applied a tax rate to the assessed value of Union Pacific's property that exceeds the tax rate generally applicable to commercial and industrial property. This excessive tax rate violates Section 306(1)(c) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, now codified at 49 U.S.C. Section 1150l(b)(3), which bars state and local governments from levying or collecting an ad valorem tax on railroad property at a tax rate that is higher than the tax rate generally applicable to commercial and industrial property in the same assessment jurisdiction. Multiple court decisions recognize that because there is no specific rate for commercial and industrial property under California law, the appropriate benchmark rate to determine a violation of Section 11501(b)(3) is the average tax rate for all property. See BNSF Railway Company v. County of Alameda, 7 F.4th 874 (9th Cir. 2021) and Trailer Train Company v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 867 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 (1983). The County has applied a tax rate to Union Pacific's property that exceeds this benchmark rate, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 1150l(b)(3). For similar reasons, the tax rate the County has applied to Union Pacific's property also violates California law, including, without limitation, Article XIII, Section 19 of the California Constitution, which requires that railroad and utility property "be subject to taxation to the same extent and in the same manner as other property." In ITT World Comm. v. City and County of San Francisco, 37 Cal.3d 859, 693 P2d 811 (1985), the California Supreme Court held this provision means that state-assessed public utility and railroad property must be subject to the same tax rate as locally assessed property. The County has applied a tax rate to Union Pacific's property that exceeds thetax rate for locally assessed property, in violation of California law. Because the County has applied an excessive tax rate to Union Pacific's property in violation of federal and state law, the excessive taxes were illegally levied and erroneously and illegal collected, entitling Union Pacific to a refund under Cal. Rev. & Tax Code§ 5096 et seq. Union Pacific seeks a refund of the excessive portion of the taxes it has paid, plus interest, costs, attorneys' fees, and any other relief that may be permitted under Cal. Rev. & Tax Code§ 5096 et seq. or any other applicable statute, law, or regulation. Union Pacific is filing this claim with the Board of Supervisors, the Treasurer/Tax Collector, and the Califor:µia State Board of Equalization, as applicable. For further information, please contact Robert Morgan, Union Pacific General Director of Property Tax, at ( 402) 544- 4872. CONTRA. COSTA C01JNTY RUSe;ELL V. WATTS, TREASURER~TAX COLi.t::(,/OR RAILROAD PROPERTIES FISCAi. YEAR JllLY I, 2018 TO .JUNE 30, 2019 ASSESSED TO:. Union Pacific Railroad Company c/o Tax Dept NOTICE DATE: October 10, 2018 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 843 1400 Douglas St, Stop 1640 Omaha, NE 68179~1640 Land $8,863,205 Assessed Val ue Tax Rate 1.62 6 9% VALUATION Improvements Personal Property Total Assessed Value $6,654, 168 . $3,809,284 $19,326,657 Total Tax Due First lnstallme.nt Second Installment $314,425.38 $157,212.69 $157 ,21 2.69 This is your notice for RAILROAD PROPERTY TAX In Contra Costa County for the fiscal year 2018-2019, as reported by the State Board of Equalization. Pursuant to Section 2503.2 of the Revenue & Taxation Code. all taxp a y ers making single or aggreg ate tax payment(sl of FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS {$50.000) or more are required to send p ay ments via electronic funds transfer (EFT) or by wire. If you have any questions, call (925) 957-2828 between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. or write to: CCC Tax Collector, ATIN: Danielle Goodbar, 625 Court Street Rm. 100, Martinez, CA 94553-1231. -··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-.. -··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-J!S!;~.IliJt!9~ .. ~.l!T.!Qt-i_f.Q!LY.Q.V.B.~£QB~!>._ .. _ .. _ .. -.. -.. _ .. _, __ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _,,_,,_ .. ____ ··-.. -··-··-··· '•> ,.>·,:'''· '· ,_._.J. '--"·' ,:c:.•: ,..1 ,~.•: 1, • :·~ ··1· .• • •· ' ~"·'=""""'"'',.~~"' "_ •:r uw''--···'"· ·'"'' '"'''""'·"'"' 1 •• w .• w :-· . .,. ..,. .,.,,...., • .,._ RECOMMENDATION(S): Union Pacific Railroad Claims for Refund - See Attached. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Please see attached letter. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: County Counsel I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: 1. To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Closed Session - Union Pacific Railroad Claims for Refund ATTACHMENTS Union Pacific Railroad Claims for Refund LORETO BAY ESTATES 15-LOT SUBDIVISION CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 B OARD OF S UPERVISORS F EBRUARY 7, 2023 2 3 Aerial Photograph 4 General Plan 5 Zoning 6 Project Components Rezoning, Subdivision, Preliminary and Final Development Plan 15 residential lots, four common areas (bioretention basins and a park) Five trees to be removed Lot sizes range in size from approximately 3,821 –6,114 square feet. Four floor plans, residences will range in size from approximately 1,829 –2,559 square feet of living area Grading of approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill 7 8 9 10 Staff Recommendations 1.OPEN the public hearing on the Loreto Bay Estates Project, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2.FIND that the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the Project adequately analyzes the Project’s environmental impacts, that there is no substantial evidence the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the mitigated negative declaration reflects the County’s independent judgment and analysis. 3.ADOPT the mitigated negative declaration for the Project. 4.ADOPT the mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the Project. 5.ADOPT Ordinance No. 2023-05, rezoning the subject property from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to Planned Unit District (P-1) (County File #CDRZ21-03260). 6.APPROVE a variance from the five-acre minimum lot size required of the Planned Unit District to allow the rezoning of the subject 2.88-acre property. 7.APPROVE the preliminary and final development plan for the Project, including the associated tree removal program (County File #CDDP21- 03028). 8.APPROVE the findings in support of the Project. 9.APPROVE the Project conditions of approval. 10.APPROVE the Loreto Bay Estates Project. 11.ACKNOWLEDGE that the Planning Commission approved the tentative map for the Project, and that no appeal of this approval was filed. 12.DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. 13.SPECIFY that the Department of Conservation and Development, located at 30 Muir Street, Martinez, California, is the custodian of the documents and other material that constitutes the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Board of Supervisors is based. Questions? 11 BIO- RETENTION BASIN 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 13 12 14 15 BIORETENTION BASIN BIORETENTION BASIN B I O R E T E N T I O N B A S I N P A R C E L D OPEN SPACE AREA D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP Discovery Builders Inc. D a t e 10/08/21 LORETO BAY ESTATES BAY POINT, CA SHEET INDEX A.0 COVER SHEET C.01 MASTER PLOTTING PLAN C3 TENTATIVE MAP - GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN C4 TENTATIVE MAP - TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS C5 TENTATIVE MAP - STORM WATER CONTROL PLAN C6 HYDROLOGY EXHIBIT P1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN P2 FENCING PLAN A.1 PLAN 1 - FRONT ELEVATIONS "A" & "B" A.2 PLAN 1 - SITE PLAN A.3 PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN A.4 PLAN 1 - ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN "A" A.5 PLAN 1 - ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN "B" A.6 PLAN 2 - FRONT ELEVATIONS "A" & "B" A.7 PLAN 2 - SITE PLAN A.8 PLAN 2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A.9 PLAN 2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A.10 PLAN 2 - ELEVATION & ROOF PLAN "A" A.0 C1 TENTATIVE MAP - SITE PLAN KEY PLAN VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT LIVING PLAN 2:2438 PLAN 3:2559 PLAN 4:2375 PLAN 1:1829 GARAGE 420 422 456 420 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS PLAN 2:5 PLAN 3:5 PLAN 4:4 PLAN 1:4 PARKING SUMMARY COVERED 2-CAR GARAGE PER PLAN C2 TENTATIVE MAP - EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT TEAM APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP 4021 PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY CONCORD, CA 94520 CIVIL:BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2290 DIAMOND BLVD., STE 100 CONCORD, CA 94520 LANDSCAPE:MSLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 306 CANYON FALLS DRIVE FOLSOM, CA 95630 DISCOVERY HOMES HOLDINGS, LLC 4021 PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY CONCORD, CA 94520 A.11 PLAN 2 - ELEVATION & ROOF PLAN "B" A.12 PLAN 3 - FRONT ELEVATIONS "A" & "B" A.13 PLAN 3 - SITE PLAN A.14 PLAN 3 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A.15 PLAN 3 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A.16 PLAN 3 - ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN "A" A.17 PLAN 3 - ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN "B" A.18 PLAN 4 - FRONT ELEVATION A.19 PLAN 4 - SITE PLAN A.20 PLAN 4 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN A.21 PLAN 4 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A.22 PLAN 4 - ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN A.23 COLOR BOARD AND DETAILS C.02 DENSITY EXHIBIT C7 SIGNING & STRIPING PLAN BIO- RETENTION BASIN 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 10 9 8 7 13 12 14 15 BIORETENTION BASIN BIORETENTION BASIN B I O R E T E N T I O N B A S I N OPEN SPACE AREA P A R C E L D MASTER PLOTTING PLAN BAY POINT, CA D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP MARCH 31, 2022 1 SINGLE STORY 5 33% COUNT PERCENT PLAN# 100.0% GRAND TOTAL HOMES: 15 TOTAL PERCENT: DISTRIBUTION TABLE TYPICAL MINIMUM LOT SETBACKS N.T.S. 5 33% 4 27% 1 7% 2 TWO STORY 3 TWO STORY 4 TWO STORY 40'40'40'43'-5" LORETO BAY ESTATES C.01 DENSITY EXHIBIT BAY POINT, CA D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP MARCH 31, 2022 LORETO BAY ESTATES NET AREA = 2.43 AC 15 UNITS / 2.43 AC = 6.17 DU/AC C.02 LEGEND PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY TYPICAL STREET 'A' SECTION (PRIVATE)TYPICAL STREET 'B2' SECTION (PRIVATE)TYPICAL STREET 'B1' SECTION (PRIVATE) HAMMERHEAD DETAIL #1 HAMMERHEAD DETAIL #2 TYPICAL PULLMAN AVENUE SECTION PRELIMINARY DMA 1 58,248 SF DMA 3 15,671 SF DMA 2 52,943 SF IMP 1 5,647 SF IMP 3 1,099 SF IMP 2 3,061 SF LEGEND DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION PROPOSED STORM DRAIN DMA 3 78,460 SF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA IMP 3 3,411 SF BOUNDARY LIMITS PRELIMINARY PRACTICE AREA 1.34 AC 0.64 DA1 C 1.63 CFS Tc Q8.5 MIN i 1.9 IN/HR 1.22 AC 0.64 DA2 C 1.48 CFS Tc Q6.5 MIN i 1.9 IN/HR 0.36 AC 0.64 DA3 C 0.44 CFS Tc Q6.2 MIN i 1.9 IN/HR PRELIMINARY STOPSTOPPRELIMINARY BIO-RETENTIONBASIN654321111098713121415BIORETENTION BASINBIORETENTION BASINBIORETENTION BASINOPENSPACELORETTO BAY ESTATESCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIATOTALSHEETTOTALOFC:\Users\Michael\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_752\EXH_Loretto_Bay_Prelim.dwg Aug 04, 2021-11:56 am2AUGUST 4, 2021MICHAELSHULAR,No.4 8 9 8 DateRenewal DateLICENSEDLANDSCAPEARC H IT E C T Exp. 05.31.22SignatureAINROFILACFOETATS306 Canyon Falls Dr. Folsom, CA 95630www.msladesign.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, Inc.916.989.3372PRELIMINARYP1PROPOSED PLANTSSYMBOLBOTANICAL/ COMMON NAMECERCIS OCCIDENTALIS/ WESTERN REDBUDTREESSALVIA GREGGII 'FURMANS RED'/ RED SAGELAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA/ ENGLISH LAVENDERCALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN'/ DWARF BOTTLEBRUSHGREVILLEA X 'NOELLII'/ NOELL GREVILLEAARBUTUS UNEDO 'MARINA'/ STRAWBERRY TREEXYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'COMPACTA'/ COMPACT XYLOSMA15 GALLON CONTAINERSSYMBOLBOTANICAL/ COMMON NAMESHRUBS1 GALLON CONTAINERSROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'TUSCAN BLUE'/ ROSEMARYNANDINA 'GULF STREAM'/ HEAVENLY BAMBOOLANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS/ TRAILING LANTANA5 GALLON CONTAINERSPISTACIA CHINENSIS 'KEITH DAVEY' CHINESE PISTACHEPRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'COMPACTA' /COMPACT CHERRY LAURELLAGERSTROEMIA DYNAMITE'/ CRAPE MYRTLEPULLMAN AVENUEPRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANMOW-FREEBIO-RETENTION SODWITHIN BASINS, TYP.MOW-FREEBIO-RETENTION SODWITHIN BASINS, TYP.MOW-FREEBIO-RETENTION SODWITHIN BASINS, TYP.SIDE YARD TREES ANDPLANTERGOOD NEIGHBORFENCECONCRETE WALKAND DRIVEWAYACCENT TREESCANOPY TREESTYPICAL FRONT YARD PLANTING1"=10'-0"YARD GATESCORNER LOTINTERIOR LOT30'60'0'SCALE: 1"=30'-0"15'LOT 15LOT 15 FRONT YARD PLANTING1"=10'-0"YARD GATEACCENT TREESCONCRETE WALKAND DRIVEWAYCANOPY TREESGOOD NEIGHBORFENCEOPEN SPACE WITHTURF AND ONESITTING BENCH BIO-RETENTIONBASIN654321111098713121415BIORETENTION BASINBIORETENTION BASINBIORETENTION BASINOPENSPACELORETTO BAY ESTATESCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIATOTALSHEETTOTALOFC:\Users\Michael\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_752\EXH_Loretto_Bay_Prelim.dwg Aug 04, 2021-11:56 am2AUGUST 4, 2021MICHAELSHULAR,No.4 8 9 8 DateRenewal DateLICENSEDLANDSCAPEARC H IT E C T Exp. 05.31.22SignatureAINROFILACFOETATS306 Canyon Falls Dr. Folsom, CA 95630www.msladesign.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, Inc.916.989.3372PRELIMINARYP2PULLMAN AVENUEGOOD NEIGHBOR WOOD FENCE WITH STEEL POSTS AND GATE DETAILNTS6'HINGE, TYP.HOUSEWALL2"x4" BRACE BOARD(TOP AND BOTTOM OF GATE)WOOD FENCE BOARDS4"x6" PRESSURE TREATED DOUG FIRWOOD POST (TYP.)LATCH2"x4" DIAGONALBRACE BOARD48"2"x10" CAP2"x6" TYP.FENCE BOARDS(BOTH SIDES)FINISH GRADEFOOTINGSDOUBLE FACED BOARD FENCENTS4"x6" POSTS2"x10" REDWOOD CAP4"x6" PRESSURETREATED POSTS(TYP.)FENCE BOARDS6'-8' BASED ON STUDY2 3/8" SCH 20 GALV.STEEL POSTSCHAIN-LINK FENCEDOUBLE FACED BOARD FENCE16' WIDE BOARD GATEGOOD NEIGHBOR FENCEBETWEEN HOMESBACK YARD GATE LOCATIONS, TYP.FENCING PLAN30'60'0'SCALE: 1"=30'-0"15'1"x6" FENCEBOARDS2"x8" PTCT KICK BOARDFINISH GRADE2"x4" DADOTOP RAIL2"x4" DADOBOTTOM RAIL8' O.C. TYP.2 3/8" SCH 20 GALV.STEEL POSTS1"x6" POST COVER2"x4" POST FRAMES8" DIA x 24" DEEP CONCRETEPIERSTOP VIEWSIDE VIEW8' GATECONNECT TO EXISTING FENCE D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Site Plan Plan 1 Contra Costa County ZONING SETBACKS Note: 5' min. sideyard 15' aggregate side yard (*) Location of 10' sideyard may vary on lots. * A.2 D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Floor Plan Plan 1 A.3 Elevations 'A' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 1 Right Roof Plan 'A' Rear Left A.4 Elevations 'B' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 1 Right Roof Plan 'B' Rear Left A.5 A.6 D a t e 10/08/2021DISCOVERYDESIGNGROUPBAY POINT, CALORETO BAY ESTATESDiscovery Builders, Inc.Site PlanPlan 2Contra Costa CountyZONING SETBACKSNote: 5' min. sideyard15' aggregate side yard(*) Location of 10' sideyardmay vary on lots.*A.7 D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. First Floor Plan 2 A.8 D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Second Floor Plan 2 A.9 Elevations 'A' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 2 RightRoof Plan 'A' Rear Left A.10 Elevations 'B' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 2 RightRoof Plan 'B' Rear Left A.11 A.12 D a t e 10/08/2021DISCOVERYDESIGNGROUPBAY POINT, CALORETO BAY ESTATESDiscovery Builders, Inc.Site PlanPlan 3Contra Costa CountyZONING SETBACKSNote: 5' min. sideyard15' aggregate side yard(*) Location of 10' sideyardmay vary on lots.*A.13 D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. First Floor Plan 3 A.14 D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Second Floor Plan 3 A.15 Elevations 'A' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 3 RightRoof Plan 'A' Rear Left A.16 Elevations 'B' D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 3 RightRoof Plan 'B' Rear Left A.17 A.18 D a t e 03/30/2022 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Site Plan Plan 4 Contra Costa County ZONING SETBACKS A.19 D a t e 03/30/2022 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. First Floor Plan 4 A.20 D a t e 03/30/2022 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Second Floor Plan 4 A.21 Elevations D a t e 10/08/2021 D ISCOVERY D ESIGN G ROUP BAY POINT, CA LORETO BAY ESTATES Discovery Builders, Inc. Plan 4 RightRoof Plan Rear Left A.22 A.23 CDRZ21-03260 CDSD21-09588 CDDP21-03028 Legend 1:4,514 Notes0.10.07 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. General Plan: Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) City Limits General Plan SV (Single Family Residential - Very Low) SL (Single Family Residential - Low) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) SH (Single Family Residential - High) ML (Multiple Family Residential - Low) MM (Multiple Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) MV (Multiple Family Residential - Very High) MS (Multiple Family Residential - Very High Special) CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) MO (Mobile Home) M-1 (Parker Avenue Mixed Use) M-2 (Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use) M-3 (Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use) M-4 (Willow Pass Road Mixed Use) M-5 (Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use) M-6 (Bay Point Residential Mixed Use) M-7 (Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Mixed Use) M-8 (Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed Use) M-9 (Montalvin Manor Mixed Use) M-10 (Willow Pass Business Park Mixed Use) M-11 (Appian Way Mixed Use) M-12 (Triangle Area Mixed Use) M-13 (San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use) M-14 (Heritage Mixed Use) CO (Commercial) OF (Office) BP (Business Park) LI (Light Industry) HI (Heavy Industry) AL, OIBA (Agricultural Lands & Off Island Bonus Area) CR (Commercial Recreation) ACO (Airport Commercial) LF (Landfill) PS (Public/Semi-Public) PR (Parks and Recreation) OS (Open Space) AL (Agricultural Lands) AC (Agricultural Core) DR (Delta Recreation) WA (Water) WS (Watershed) Streets CDRZ21-03260 CDSD21-09588 CDDP21-03028 Legend 1:4,514 Notes0.10.07 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. General Plan: Heavy Industrial (H-I) City Limits Zoning R-6 (Single Family Residential) R-6, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-6 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) R-6 -TOV -K (Tree Obstruction and Kensington) R-6, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-6 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-7 (Single Family Residential) R-7 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-10 (Single Family Residential) R-10, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) R-20 (Single Family Residential) R-20, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-40 (Single Family Residential) R-40, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-40, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-65 (Single Family Residential) R-100 (Single Family Residential) D-1 (Two Family Residential) D-1 -T (Transitional Combining District) D-1, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) M-12 (Multiple Family Residential) M-12 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) M-17 (Multiple Family Residential) M-29 (Multiple Family Residential) F-R (Forestry Recreational) F-R -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) F-1 (Water Recreational) F-1 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2 (General Agriculture) A-2, -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-2, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) A-2, -SG (Solar Energy Generation Combining District) A-2 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) A-3 (Heavy Agriculture) A-3 -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-3, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-3 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-3, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) CDRZ21-03260 CDSD21-09588 CDDP21-03028 Legend 1:2,257 Notes0.10.04 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Aerial Photo City Limits Streets Building Outlines Assessment Parcels World Imagery Low Resolution 15m Imagery High Resolution 60cm Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Citations H-I -X P-1 P-1 P-1 H-I P-1 Pullman AvePoinsettia AveTormey Ave Crivello AveFairview AveAlfaro Ave ORDINANCE NO._____________ (Re-Zoning Land in the __________________________ Area) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows: Pages _______________ of the County's 2005 Zoning Map (Ord. No. 2005-03) is amended byre-zoning the land in the above area shown shaded on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated herein (see also Department of Conservation and Development File No. _____________________ .) FROM: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) TO: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) and the Department of Conservation and Development Director shall change the Zoning Map accordingly, pursuant to Ordinance Code Sec. 84.2.002. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it inthe __________________________________ , a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on ________________by the following vote: Supervisor SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION I: Aye No Absent Abstain 1. J. Gioia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2. C. Andersen ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3. D. Burgis ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4. K. Carlson ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )5. F.D. Glover ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ATTEST: Monica Nino, County Administratorand Clerk of the Board of Supervisors __________________________________________________ Chair of the BoardBy__________________________________, Dep. (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO._____________ RZ21-3260 - Discovery Builders Inc. 2023-05 Bay Point E-18 RZ21-3260 H-I -X P-1 Heavy Industrial District, Railroad Corridor Combining District Planned Unit District 2023-05 Page 1 of 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program County File #CDSD21-09588 Pullman Avenue and Fairview Avenue Bay Point, CA 94565 July 29, 2022 Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 2 of 9 SECTION 1: AESTHETICS Impact AES-4: New exterior lighting from the project site could adversely affect nighttime views in the area. AES-4: Exterior Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of-way to prevent glare or excessive light spillover. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to, during, and post construction. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: If proposed, include on construction plan set for CDD review. SECTION 2: AIR QUALITY Impact AIR-2: Exhaust emissions and particulate matter produced by construction activities related to the project may cause exposure of the public or sensitive receptors to significant amounts of pollutants. Mitigation Measure AIR-2: The following Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Basic Construction mitigation measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be stated on the face of all construction plans: A. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. B. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. C. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. D. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. E. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. F. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. G. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. H. The applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the developer/project manager’s name and telephone number regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 3 of 9 take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to and during construction. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: Include on construction plan set for CDD review. SECTION 3: CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact CUL-1: Subsurface construction activities could have the potential to damage previously undiscovered historical resources. Mitigation Measure CUL-1: If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face all construction plans: All construction personnel, including operators of equipment involved in grading, or trenching activities will be advised of the need to immediately stop work if they observe any indications of the presence of an unanticipated cultural resource discovery (e.g. wood, stone, foundations, and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; deposits of wood, glass, ceramics). If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the finds and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the appropriate County and other agencies. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If eligible, deposits will need to be avoided by impacts or such impacts must be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the NWIC and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: During initial review of construction plan sets and throughout project. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: Include on construction plan set and submittal of archaeologist report in the event of a find, for CDD review. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 4 of 9 Impact CUL-2: Subsurface construction activities may have a significant impact to previously undiscovered archaeological resources. See Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Impact CUL-3: Project activities could have the potential to significantly impact previously undiscovered human remains. Mitigation Measure CULT-3: If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face of all construction plans: If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. The MLD will work with the Applicant and a qualified archaeologist to determine the proper treatment of the human remains and any associated funerary objects. Construction activities will not resume until either the human remains are exhumed, or the remains are avoided via project construction design change. Upon completion of the assessment by an archaeologist, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa agencies. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: During initial review of construction plan sets and throughout project. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: Include on construction plan set and submittal of archaeologist report in the event of a find, for CDD review. SECTION 4: GEOLOGY/SOILS Impact GEO-1: The geotechnical investigation concludes there is a 20 ft. thick non-liquifiable cap that will protect the proposed residential project from ground failure associated with liquefaction that has been forecasted at depths ranging between 21.3 to 49.1 ft. below the grounds surface. The cap itself contains sand beds that are deemed to be non-liquefiable based on the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 5 of 9 logs. The forecasted estimates of settlement associated with liquefaction were based on engineering properties of the alluvial deposits penetrated in CPT-1 and CPT-3. Additional evaluation of liquefaction potential is warranted to address the following:  Analysis of liquefaction potential of the alluvial deposits penetrated by CPT-2.  On the basis of CPT data alone, the sand beds within the non-liquefiable cap were considered to be too cohesive or too dense to liquefy. Best evidence would be logging of at least three auger borings, recording Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) blow counts, determining the depth to the water table, sampling of sands, and laboratory testing (i.e., moisture content, dry density, gradation, etc.), followed by and evaluation of liquefaction potential using an SPT methodology compliant with standards for projects located in the Seismic Hazard Zone. This approach would provide additional data to confirm/ modify the consultant’s preliminary interpretation of cap thickness. Mitigation Measure GEO-1a: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide an updated geotechnical report for the review and approval by the County’s Geologist and the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD). The scope of the geotechnical update report shall include logging of a minimum of at least three auger borings that are approximately 25 ft. deep, each. Provide adequate data on the engineering properties of the sand layers within the non-liquefiable cap (i.e., within approximately 20 ft. of the ground surface). If this screening investigation encountered sands that were considered to be possible candidates for liquefaction, the liquefaction potential of this cap sands shall be performed. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the recordation of the final map. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Compliance Verification: Submittal of updated Geotech report for CDD and County Geologist review. Mitigation Measure GEO-1b: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide evaluation liquefaction potential of sands penetrated in CPT-2. Additionally, estimate the amount of dry consolidation settlement for CPT-2. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the recordation of the final map. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Compliance Verification: Submittal of evaluation report for CDD and County Geologist review. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 6 of 9 Impact GEO-2: The geotechnical report prepared for the project presented laboratory test data indicating the surface soils are expansive. Mitigation Measure GEO-2: The applicant shall provide additional design details on the mitigation of expansive soils (i.e., recommendations) addressing (a) thickness of the import fill material on building pads, (b) the project geotechnical engineer shall approve any import brought to the site, (c) the import shall not be more expansive or more corrosive than the native soils on the site, (d) specify the final grades recommended within approximately 3 ft. of the foundation to achieve compliance with the intent of the geotechnical engineers recommendation that positive drainage be provided to direct water away from the foundation, and (e) include a report from the corrosion protection engineer as an appendix to the Updated Geotechnical Report. It shall include test results; analysis of the data gathered and provide design recommendations to mitigate the hazard posed by corrosive soils. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Compliance Verification: Submittal of Updated Geotechnical Report for CDD and County Geologist review. Impact GEO-3: The Geotechnical Report prepared presented laboratory test data indicating potential corrosion of soils. Mitigation Measure GEO-3a: The Updated Geotechnical Report shall include a citation to the project plans and shall comment on their compliance with geotechnical recommendations and specifications. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the recordation of the final map or grading. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Compliance Verification: Submittal of Updated Geotechnical Report and provide construction plan set for CDD and County Geologist review. Mitigation Measure GEO-3b: The Updated Geotechnical Report shall comment on grading and drainage plans for the project, including the citing and design of the Stormwater C.3 basins. If they are available, provide comments on the foundation plans and associated exhibits. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 7 of 9 Compliance Verification: Submittal of an Updated Geotechnical Report and provide construction plan set for CDD and County Geologist review. Mitigation Measure GEO-3c: The project geotechnical engineer shall provide adequate observation services to confirm that their foundation, final grading, and drainage recommendations have been implemented, as well as backfilling of utility trenches and construction of the private roads and flatwork. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and during grading activities. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Geologist, County Geologist, and CDD. Compliance Verification: Submittal of observation report and provide construction plan set for CDD and County Geologist review. Impact GEO-4: Unexpected discovery or find may occur during the construction phase of the project. Mitigation Measure GEO-4: The following General Notes shall be placed on Sheets that show drainage improvements and utility improvements. • The underground/ grading contractor shall provide a minimum of 24-hour notice to the entity charged with providing the monitoring services. • The entity that is providing the monitoring service shall be identified (name of firm, mailing address, phone number, and email). Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Throughout grading and project, review of information submitted. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: Include on drainage improvement and utility improvement plan set for CDD review. SECTION 5: NOISE Impact NOISE-1: Construction related activities could generate a temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project. Mitigation Measure NOISE-1: The following noise reduction measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be included on all construction plans. 1. Unless specifically approved otherwise via prior authorization from the Zoning Administrator, all construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 8 of 9 Friday, and are prohibited on State and Federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the State or Federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) President’s Day (State) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Juneteenth National Independence Holiday (Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For specific details on the actual day the State and Federal holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal Holidays: Federal Holidays (opm.gov) California Holidays: http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutftb/holidays.shtml 2. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project-related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to uses on the site. This shall be communicated to all project-related contractors. 3. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. 4. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are imposed on construction activities, except that the hours shall be limited to weekdays between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. and prohibited on State and Federal holidays. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: During initial review of construction plan sets and throughout project. Responsible Department, Agency, or Party: Project Proponent and CDD. Compliance Verification: Include on construction plan set for CDD review. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Condition of Approval (COA) CDSD21-09588 Community Development Division (CDD) Page 9 of 9 SECTION 6: TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact TRIBAL CUL-1: The project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). The expected construction and grading could cause ground disturbance which may impact heretofore undocumented cultural resources. See Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Impact TRIBAL CUL-1: The project could potentially significant impact related to historic resources. See Mitigation Measure CUL-1. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1.Project Title:Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 2.Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Rd. Martinez, CA 94553 3.Contact Person and Phone Number: Jennifer Cruz, Principal Planner, (925) 655-2867 4.Project Location:2.88-acre parcel on Pullman Avenue and Fairview Avenue, Bay Point, CA APN: 096-050-016 5.Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Monte Davis for Discovery Builders Inc. 4021 Port Chicago Hwy. Concord, CA 94520 6.General Plan Designation:The subject property is located within the Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) General Plan land use designation. 7.Zoning:Existing - The subject property is located within the Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) Proposed – Planned Unit District (P-1). 8.Description of Project: The applicant seeks approval of a rezoning of the subject property from H-1, Heavy Industrial Zoning District, Railroad Corridor Combining District to a Planned Unit District (P-1), a tentative map to subdivide the approximately 2.88-acre project site into 15 residential lots and four common area parcels for bioretention basins and a park, and a preliminary and final development plan to allow the construction of 15 residences. The residential lots will range in size from approximately 3,821 – 6,114 square feet. The common area parcels for the bioretention basins (Parcels A, B, D) range in size from approximately 6,611 – 10,263 square feet. The proposed park will be located on Parcel C and will be approximately 3,590 square feet. The proposed residences will range in size from approximately 1,829 – 2,559 square feet of living area. There will be approximately five code-protected trees removed, all consisting of Ailanthus Altissima trees, commonly known as Tree of Heaven . A request for a variance to allow the rezoning of the 2.88-acre property to a P-1 (where 5 acres is the minimum) is included in the project. There will be approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill that will be balanced on-site. 2 The subject property is not located within the Delta Diablo service boundary. Therefore, the project will require approval from the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Surrounding Area: The subject property is located in the Bay Point area of the County. The immediate surrounding area to the south and west primarily consists of single-family residential uses. However, further west and south of the subject property includes multiple-family residential uses. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) line borders the entire length of the northern property line and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway exist further to the north of the site, running east and west. The land further to the north is designated as open space and is adjacent to the Sacramento/San Joaquin River. The land immediately to the east is currently vacant with residential uses within the City of Pittsburg further to the east. Highway 4 is approximately 0.75 miles south of the property. Subject Property: The approximately 2.88-acre triangular shaped vacant site is located at the corner of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue in the Bay Point area of the County. Pullman Avenue is located to the south of the project site and Fairview Avenue is located to the west of the project site. The project site is relatively flat and located within the Urban Limit Line. The site has approximately five multi-stemmed Ailanthus Altissima trees, commonly known as Tree of Heaven. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing, approval, or participation agreement: • Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division • Contra Costa County Public Works Department • Contra Costa County Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division • Contra Costa County Fire Protection District • Golden State Water District • Delta Diablo Sanitary District • Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Notification of an opportunity to request consultation was submitted to the Wilton Rancheria Indian Tribe on April 18, 2022. The Tribe indicated no concerns on the project. 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Services Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Jennifer Cruz Date Principal Planner Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development July 29, 2022 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 4 1. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SUMMARY: a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Less than Significant Impact) Figure 9-1 (Scenic Ridges & Waterways) of the General Plan Open Space Element identifies specific resources of Contra Costa County as designated scenic ridges and waterways. The intent of these scenic resource designations is to preserve and protect areas of identified high scenic value, where practical, and in accordance with the Land Use Element. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue in the Bay Point area. This property is located approximately 1.1 miles south of the Sacramento River Delta a designated scenic waterway, as outlined in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. The residences directly to the west, south and further east of the subject property are at the same base elevation as the subject property, which are only approximately 30 feet above sea level. Furthermore, at a distance of approximately 1.1 miles and only up to 30 feet above sea level, views of the Sacramento River from this property and the surrounding residences are minimal. Therefore, there is a less than significant adverse effect on a scenic vista. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5 The Scenic Routes Map (Figure 5-4) of the County General Plan’s Transportation and Circulation Element identifies scenic routes in the County, including both State Scenic Highways and County designated Scenic Routes. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue in the Bay Point area. Neither road is considered a scenic route, nor is the property within the local vicinity of one. Although the project site is not located in the vicinity of a state scenic highway as designed in the County’s General Plan, Highway 4 is identified as a connecting highway. However, Highway 4 is 0.75 miles south of the site and residential development exists between the project site and Highway 4. The property is currently vacant, with no structures, trees or rock outcroppings. Therefore, there is no potential for impacts to tree resources, rock outcroppings, or historic structures on the property within a scenic highway as a result of the proposed project. c) In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (Less than Significant Impact) The subject property is located within the Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) General Plan land use designation and within the Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (H-1, -X). The subject property is located in an urbanized area, primarily surrounded by residential development to the west, south, and east, and is within the Urban Limit Line. The project is to rezone the subject property to a Planned Unit District (P-1), subdivide the subject property into 15 lots and common areas, construction of 15 new residences, remove existing trees on-site, and installation of the required improvements for the subdivision. Thus, the project would not conflict with the applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality and would be less than significant. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Potential sources of light associated with the project would consist of typical sources of lighting associated with a residential development including lighting from the newly constructed residences, and vehicles traveling to and from the project site. Streetlights will be installed for public and private streets for the proposed development. Although trees and vegetation are proposed at the front of each lot, which provides some screening, the development of the 15 new residential homes on a currently undeveloped property could increase lighting above existing levels. However, Mitigation Measure (MM) AES-4 would require exterior lighting to be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of-way to prevent excessive light spillover. With the implementation of MM AES-4, lighting impacts would be less than significant. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 6 Glare resulting from the proposed residences’ windows would be minimal and would be partially obscured by landscaping, depending on the time of day and the location of the reflecting light sources. Additionally, residential glass typically has a low reflectivity rate. Glare may also occur from on-site vehicles; however, such glare would be temporary, depending upon the time of day and location of the vehicle. MM AES-4 requires exterior lighting be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of-way to prevent glare. As such, glare impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. Impact AES-4: New exterior lighting from the project site could adversely affect nighttime views in the area. MM AES-4: Exterior Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of-way to prevent glare or excessive light spillover. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Open Space Element. • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Transportation and Circulation Element. • Contra Costa County Zoning Ordinance • Bellecci & Associates, Inc. 2022. Loreto Bay Estates Tentative Map dated March 31, 2022. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 7 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? SUMMARY: a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (Less than Significant Impact) Pursuant to the 2018 Contra Costa County Important Farmland Map, the subject property has been categorized as “urban and built-up land.” Figure 8-2 (Important Agricultural Land Map) of the Conservation Element of the County General Plan does not identify the property as important agricultural area. The property is zoned as Heavy Industrial (H-1), Railroad Corridor Combining District and has a General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH). The project is to rezone the subject property to a Planned Unit District, subdivide the property into 15 lots, construct a residence on each lot, and install improvements related to the subdivision. The proposed residences are a use that is consistent with the zoning and general plan. Therefore, the potential for converting Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as categorized by the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use is less than significant. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 8 b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (No Impact) The project site is located within a Heavy Industrial, Railroad Corridor Combining District. The subject property is not currently in a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed project to conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses, or with a Williamson Act contract. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g) or conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? (No Impact) The project site is not considered forest land as defined by California Public Resources Code Section 12220(g), timberland as defined by California Public Resources Code Section 4526, or zoned Timberland Production as defined by California Government Code section 51104(g). The project site is zoned for heavy industrial uses and the project includes a rezone to a Planned Unit District to allow the residential development. Thus, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land or timberland. California Public Resources Code Section 12220, under the Forest Legacy Program Act, defines "forest land" as land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. Public Resources Code 4526, under the Forest Practice Act, defines "timberland" as land, other than land owned by the federal government and land designated by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection as experimental forest land, which is available for, and capable of, growing a crop of trees of any commercial species used to produce lumber and other forest products, including Christmas trees. Commercial species are determined by the board on a district basis after consultation with the district committees and others. California Government Code 51104, under the Timberland Productivity Act, defines "timberland" as privately owned land, or land acquired for state forest purposes, which is devoted to and used for growing and harvesting timber, or for growing and harvesting timber and compatible uses, and which is capable of growing an average annual volume of wood fiber of at least 15 cubic feet per acre. "Timberland production zone" or "TPZ" means an area which has been zoned pursuant Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 9 to Section 51112 or 51113 of the Government Code and is devoted to and used for growing and harvesting timber, or for growing and harvesting timber and compatible uses, as defined in Public Resources Code 4526 or 12220. With respect to the general plans of cities and counties, "timberland preserve zone" means "timberland production zone." As stated in the Contra Costa County General Plan, no land is used for timber harvesting. d) Would the project involve or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? (No Impact) The project site is a 2.88-acre vacant property with five trees. The project site is zoned Heavy Industrial, Railroad Corridor Combining District. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Single-Family Residential-High Density. The project to rezone the site to a Planned Unit District, subdivide the site into 15 residential lots, and construct 15 residences and related improvements is consistent with the uses designated for the site. Furthermore, the project site is located in a developed area and the project site is currently zoned for industrial uses. Thus, the project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use? (No Impact) The project site is surrounded by primarily residential and industrial zoned areas of the County. The project is to rezone the property from Heavy Industrial, Railroad Corridor Combining District to a Planned Unit District (P-1), subdivide the site into 15 residential lots, and construct 15 residences and related improvements. Construction of a residence is an allowed use within the proposed P-1 zoning district. Furthermore, the project site is located in a developed area and the project site is currently zoned for industrial uses. Thus, the proposed project would not result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use. Sources of Information • Government Code section 51104(g) • California Public Resources Code Section 12220(g) • California Public Resources Code Section 4526 • Contra Costa County Code, Title 8, Zoning Ordinance. • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Land Use Element, Conservation Element • California Department of Conservation. Contra Costa County Important Farmland 2018. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 10 3. AIR QUALITY – Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? SUMMARY: a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The 2017 Clean Air Plan, prepared by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), is the most recent plan prepared to fulfill state and federal air pollution reduction requirements. The 2017 plan provides a regional strategy to protect public health and protect the climate, as well as describing how the air district will continue to progress toward attaining all state and federal air quality standards and eliminating health risk disparities from exposure to air pollution among Bay Area communities. To accomplish this, the 2017 plan describes a multi-pollutant strategy to simultaneously reduce emissions and ambient concentrations of ozone, fine particulate matter, toxic air contaminants, as well as greenhouse gases (GHG) that contribute to climate change. The subdivision of land, or any other aspects of the proposed project, does not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any air quality plans for the region; therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on this analysis category. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) In developing thresholds of significance for criteria air pollutants, the BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively significant. As such, if a project exceeds the identified thresholds of significance, its emissions would be significant in terms of both project- and cumulative-level impacts, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Thus, this impact analysis and discussion is related to the project- and cumulative-level effect of the project’s regional criteria air pollutant emissions. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 11 The region is non-attainment for the federal and State ozone standards, the State PM10 standards, and the federal and State PM2.5 standards. Potential impacts would result in exceedances of State or federal standards for NOX or particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). NOX emissions are of concern because of potential health impacts from exposure to NOX emissions during both construction and operation and as a precursor in the formation of airborne ozone. PM10 and PM2.5 are of concern during construction, because of the potential to emit exhaust emissions from the operation of off-road construction equipment and fugitive dust during earth-disturbing activities (construction fugitive dust). ROG emissions are also important, because of their participation in the formation of airborne ozone. Ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and that can cause substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. Elevated ozone concentrations result in reduced lung function, particularly during vigorous physical activity. This health problem is particularly acute in sensitive receptors such as the sick, elderly, and young children. By its nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact resulting from emissions generated over a large geographic region. The non-attainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development within the Air Basin, and this regional impact is a cumulative impact. In other words, new development projects (such as the proposed project) within the Air Basin would contribute to this impact only on a cumulative basis. No single project would be sufficient in size, by itself, to result in non-attainment of regional air quality standards. Instead, a project’s emissions may be individually limited, but cumulatively significant when taken in combination with past, present, and future development projects. The cumulative analysis focuses on whether a specific project would result in cumulatively significant emissions. According to Section 15064(h)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, the existence of significant cumulative impacts caused by other projects alone does not constitute substantial evidence that the project’s incremental effects would be cumulatively significant. Rather, the determination of cumulative air quality impacts for construction and operational emissions is based on whether the proposed project would result in regional emissions that exceed the BAAQMD regional thresholds of significance for construction and operations on a project level. The thresholds of significance represent the allowable amount of emissions each project can generate without generating a cumulatively significant contribution to regional air quality impacts. Therefore, a project that would not exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance on the project level also would not be considered to result in a cumulatively significant impact with regard to regional air quality and would not be considered to result in a significant impact related to cumulative regional air quality. Construction of the Project would result in emissions of criteria pollutants from the use of heavy- duty construction equipment, haul truck trips, and vehicle trips generated from construction Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 12 workers traveling to and from the site. In addition, fugitive dust PM10 emissions would result from excavation, trenching, and other construction activities. Construction would occur over approximately two years total (site preparation and construction of homes). Site preparation consists of the tree removal and minimal grading. Approximately 2,000 cubic yards is proposed for grading, which will be balanced on-site. Construction-related effects from fugitive dust from the proposed project would be greatest during the site preparation and grading phases due to the disturbance of soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions in the area of the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PM10 emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity (amount of equipment operating), local weather conditions (such as wind speed), and characteristics such as soil moisture and silt content of the soil. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, while fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site. For mitigation of fugitive dust emissions, the BAAQMD recommends implementing best management practices (BMPs), as a pragmatic and effective approach to controlling fugitive dust emissions (BAAQMD, 2017a). The BAAQMD notes that individual measures have been shown to reduce fugitive dust by anywhere from 30 percent to more than 90 percent. The BAAQMD considers any project’s construction-related impacts to be less than significant if the required dust-control measures are implemented. Without these measures, the impact is generally considered to be significant, particularly if sensitive land uses are located in the project vicinity. There are a number of residences located along the southern and western border of the project site that would be impacted by fugitive dust generated by construction activities. Therefore, implementation of these BMPs would ensure the Project’s fugitive dust emissions remained below a level of significance. Impact AIR-2: Exhaust emissions and particulate matter produced by construction activities related to the project may cause exposure of the public or sensitive receptors to significant amounts of pollutants. Mitigation Measure AIR-2: The following Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Basic Construction mitigation measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be stated on the face of all construction plans: A. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. B. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 13 C. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. D. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. E. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. F. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. G. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. H. The applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the developer/project manager’s name and telephone number regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less than Significant Impact) The project includes construction of 15 single-family residences and related improvements. The surrounding properties are primarily single-family residential uses directly south, west, and further east of the property site, and industrial uses north of the property site. The closest schools are approximately 0.68 miles south of the project site and 0.69 miles southeast of the project site. It is anticipated that sensitive receptors would not be exposed to pollutant concentrations due to the scale of the proposed project. Residential uses typically do not generate substantial pollutant concentrations. Furthermore, the construction activities will be restricted to specific days of the week and to a limited number of work hours in order to lessen the amount of time during the week that sensitive receptors would be exposed to construction-related air quality impacts. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? (Less than Significant Impact) The project includes construction of 15 single-family residences and related improvements. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust and application of asphalt and architectural coating would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent. It is anticipated that by the time such emissions reach any Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 14 sensitive receptor sites, they would be diluted to well below any level of air quality or odor concern. Therefore, construction odors impacts would be less than significant. The proposed 15 new residences would not likely generate objectionable odors. The types of uses that are considered to have objection odors include wastewater treatment plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer station, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), or petroleum refineries. The proposed project is residential in nature, and it is not anticipated to generate objectionable odors which may affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Sources of Information • Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. • Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Air Quality Guidelines. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 15 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? SUMMARY: a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Significant Ecological Areas and Selected Locations of Protected Wildlife and Plant Species Areas map (Figure 8-1) of the County General Plan, the project site is not located in or adjacent to a significant ecological area. The project area consists of non-native grasses and weeds, shrubs and a grove of small trees. There are five Ailanthus Altissima trees on the project site, commonly known as Tree of Heaven. The surrounding area primarily consists of developed Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16 properties with residences. Thus, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact to habitats or special status species. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than Significant Impact) According to the Significant Ecological Areas and Selected Locations of Protected Wildlife and Plant Species Areas map (Figure 8-1) of the County General Plan, the project site is not located in or adjacent to, a significant ecological area. The project site does not contain a riparian habitat. In addition, the project site is not within a sensitive natural community, since the surrounding area is largely developed. Thus, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Less than Significant Impact) The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (Corps) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are two of the primary Federal agencies which enforce the Clean Water Act and administer the associated permitting program. As such, these agencies define wetland as areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The subject property would not be categorized as a wetland as defined above. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed project having an adverse effect on a federally protected wetland. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Less than Significant Impact) As discussed above, the proposed project would not result in potentially significant impacts to special-status species. As such, the project’s potential to interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites is considered less than significant. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 17 The Contra Costa County Tree Protection and Preservation Ordinance provides for the protection of certain trees by regulating tree removal and development within their drip lines while allowing for reasonable development of private property. On any property proposed for development approval, the Ordinance requires tree alteration or removal to be considered as part of the project application. The proposed project includes the removal of five code-protected trees that are all Ailanthus Altissima trees, commonly known as Tree of Heaven. The proposed tree removal has been evaluated by CDD staff pursuant to the Tree Protection and Preservation Ordinance as well as the project plans for construction of the new residences, driveways, storm water control, and other site improvements and the Tree Inventory Report prepared by Traverso Tree. As the project includes the removal of code-protected trees, a tree permit is required in order to remove the trees. The project will require findings for approval or denial, and, if approved, will receive standard conditions of approval for restitution in order to reasonably restore the natural resources on-site. With the standard review and conditions implemented, the project will have a less than significant impact. f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The County has adopted the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Community Plan (HCP/NCCP), which provides a framework to protect natural resources in eastern Contra Costa County. This plan covers areas within the cities of Brentwood, Clayton, Oakley, Pittsburg, as well as unincorporated areas of eastern Contra Costa County. The subject property is within the covered area for the HCP/NCCP, and staff consulted with Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP staff. HCP/NCCP staff provided a response regarding the proposed project on August 30, 2021, stating that there are no comments. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on the HCP/NCCP. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Land Use Element, Conservation Element • Traverso Tree. 2021. Tree Inventory for Loreto Bay, Fairview Avenue, Pullman Avenue, Bay Point dated November 23, 2021. • East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy Staff. 2021. Agency Comment Letter. August 30, 2021. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 18 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? SUMMARY: a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.5? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) Historical resources are defined in the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.5 as a resources that fit any of the following definitions: • Is listed in the California Register of Historic Places and has been determined to be eligible for listing by the State Historic Resources Commission; • Is included in a local register of historic resources, and identified as significant in a historical resource survey that has been or will be included in the State Historic Resources Inventory; or • Has been determined to be historically or culturally significant by a lead agency. A memo prepared by the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) dated September 15, 2021 indicates that previous studies were prepared for the project area. There were two studies prepared, Study #30192 (Allan 2005) and Study #19778 (Eastman 1997) that identified no cultural resources within the project area. Based on the results of Study #30192 (Allan 2005), the project area has a low possibility of containing unrecorded archeological site(s). No further study for archaeological resources was recommended by NWIC. While unlikely, subsurface construction activities always have the potential to damage or destroy previously undiscovered historic resources such as wood, stone, foundations, and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; and deposits of wood, glass, ceramics, and other refuse, if encountered. This would represent a potentially significant impact related to historic resources. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the impact to undiscovered historical resources to a less than significant level. Impact CUL-1: Subsurface construction activities could have the potential to damage previously undiscovered historical resources. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 19 Mitigation Measure CUL-1: If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face all construction plans: All construction personnel, including operators of equipment involved in grading, or trenching activities will be advised of the need to immediately stop work if they observe any indications of the presence of an unanticipated cultural resource discovery (e.g. wood, stone, foundations, and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; deposits of wood, glass, ceramics). If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the finds and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the appropriate County and other agencies. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If eligible, deposits will need to be avoided by impacts or such impacts must be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the NWIC and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce the impact to a less than significant level. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.5? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) Figure 9-2 of the Open Space Element of the County General Plan identifies archaeologically sensitive areas in the County. According to this map, the project site is located within a largely urbanized area. A memo prepared by the Northwest Information Center dated September 15, 2021 indicates that previous studies were prepared for the project area. There were two studies prepared, Study #30192 (Allan 2005) and Study #19778 (Eastman 1997) that identified no cultural resources within the project area. Based on the results of Study #30192 (Allan 2005), the project area has a low possibility of containing unrecorded archeological site(s). No further study for archaeological resources was recommended. However, the project site is vacant and construction activities may encounter previously undiscovered archaeological resources. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the impact to undiscovered archaeological resources. Impact CUL-2: Subsurface construction activities may have a significant impact to previously undiscovered archaeological resources. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 20 Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) No human remains or cemeteries are known to exist within or near the project site. However, there is a possibility that human remains could be present and accidental discovery could occur. If during project construction, subsurface construction activities damaged previously human remains, there could be a potentially significant impact. If human remains or any associated funerary artifacts are discovered during construction, all work must cease within the immediate vicinity of the discovery. In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5), the Contra Costa County Sheriff/Coroner must be contacted immediately. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will in turn appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD) to act as a tribal representative and confirm next steps. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would reduce the potentially significant impact to a less than significant level. Impact CUL-3: Project activities could have the potential to significantly impact previously undiscovered human remains. Mitigation Measure CULT-3: If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face of all construction plans: If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. The MLD will work with the Applicant and a qualified archaeologist to determine the proper treatment of the human remains and any associated funerary objects. Construction activities will not resume until either the human remains are exhumed, or the remains are avoided via project construction design change. Upon completion of the assessment by an archaeologist, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 21 should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa agencies. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan 2005-2020. Open Space Element. • California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center. 2021. Agency comment letter dated September 15, 2021. 6. ENERGY – Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental effects related to energy include the project’s energy requirements and its energy use efficiencies by amount and fuel type during construction and operation; the effects of the project on local and regional energy supplies; the effects of the project on peak and base period demands for electricity and other forms of energy; the degree to which the project complies with existing energy standards; the effects of the project on energy resources; and the project’s projected transportation energy use requirements and its overall use of efficient transportation alternatives, if applicable. The following factors demonstrate a project’s significance in relation to these effects: (1) why certain measures were incorporated in the project and why other measures were dismissed; (2) The potential of siting, orientation, and design to minimize energy consumption, including transportation energy, increase water conservation and reduce solid- waste; (3) The potential for reducing peak energy demand; (4) Alternate fuels (particularly renewable ones) or energy systems; and (5) Energy conservation which could result from recycling efforts. Energy consumption includes energy required for the construction of the proposed project and the operational use of the 15 single-family residences. The proposed project’s energy demand would be typical for a development of this scope and nature and would be required to comply with current state and local codes concerning energy consumption, including Title 24 of the Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 22 California Code of Regulations, enforced by the Building Inspection Division. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact due to energy consumption. b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? (Less than Significant Impact) The Climate Action Plan (CAP) includes a number of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction strategies. The strategies include measures such as implementing standards for green buildings and energy-efficient buildings, reducing parking requirements, and reducing waste disposal. Green building codes and debris recovery programs are among the strategies currently implemented by the County. The proposed project’s energy demand would be typical for a development of this scope and nature and would be required to comply with current state and local codes concerning energy consumption, including Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, enforced by the County’s Building Inspection Division. Therefore, the project’s potential to conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency would be less then significant. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County, 2015. Climate Action Plan. 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 23 d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? SUMMARY: a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Less than Significant Impact) The California Geological Survey (CGS) has delineated Alquist-Priolo (A-P) zones along the known active faults in California. The nearest fault considered active by CGS is the Concord fault, which is mapped approximately 6 ½ miles southwest of the project site. Another fault of regional significance is the Clayton fault, a through-going, northeast-dipping thrust fault that passes approximately two miles southwest of the project site. This fault zone tends to be complicated with several subparallel and branching traces. Additionally, the USGS map identifies relatively short cross-faults that extend in a generally northerly or northwesterly direction from the main trace of the Clayton fault. Some of these faults are growth faults (i.e., the amount of displacement on these cross faults is greatest for the oldest formations that are cut by the faults, and the amount is displacement is systematically less for the younger units that the bisected by these faults. Like the Clayton fault, the minor cross-faults are considered inactive by the USGS. No faults are mapped within the Pittsburg-Antioch Plain (They are concealed by the geologically recent Quaternary deposits). A geotechnical investigation report was prepared for the site and project by TRC dated June 3, 2021. The TRC report identifies the distance of the site from known active and potentially active faults, indicating that the project site is not bisected of an active fault; and concludes the site is not located within an Earthquake Fault Zone (EFZ). Thus, the potential impact from surface fault rupture would be less than significant. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 24 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Less than Significant Impact) TRC calculated the peak ground acceleration as 0.84g. TRC also cites a USGS report that has estimated a 72% chance of at least one magnitude 6.7 earthquake occurring in the San Francisco Bay Region during the 30-year period 2014-2044. Clearly during the useful life of the proposed structures, it can be anticipated that the proposed project will be exposed to very strong to violent earthquake ground shaking. To mitigate the hazard posed to seismic shaking, the consultant has provided seismic coefficients for a Class D Site, based both on the California Building Code (2019) and Section11.4.8 ASCE 7-16 (see Table 5 on pg. 12 of the TRC report). Those parameters are used by the structural engineer in the design of civil engineering structures that require building permits. Conservative design and quality construction could keep ground shaking damage to a minimum, but it cannot be eliminated. The risk of damage from ground shaking is controlled both by use of sound engineering judgement and compliance with the latest provisions of the California Building Code (CBC), as a minimum. The seismic design provisions of the CBC prescribe minimum lateral forces applied statistically to the structure(s), combined with the gravity forces and dead-and-live loads. The code-prescribed lateral forces are generally considered to be substantially smaller than comparable forces that would be associated with a major earthquake. The intent of the code is to enable structures to (i) resist minor earthquakes without damage, (ii) resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage but with some non-structural damage, and (iii) resist major earthquakes without collapse but with some structural as well as non-structural damage. Thus, the potential impact from seismic shaking would be less than significant. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Less than Significant Impact Mitigation) TRC references the official Seismic Hazard Zone (SHZ) maps issued by the California Geological Survey and acknowledges that a portion of the project site is within the hazard zone for seismically induced liquefaction. The data gathered from CPT-1 and CPT-3 are inferred by TRC to adequately document that to a depth of 20 ft. below the ground surface there is no potential of liquefiable sands. Thus, for a surface manifestation of liquefaction (sand boils, permanent ground waves, etc.) the liquified layers would need to break through a 20 ft. thick non-liquefiable cap. Based on the analysis of liquefaction potential, TRC indicated that the total settlement resulting from liquefaction could range from ¼ to ¾ inches and differential settlement associated with liquefaction was estimated to be on the order of ½ inch for over a horizontal Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 25 distance of 50 ft. Additionally, consolidation of dry sands locate above the water table could result in additional settlement of ¼ inch. On that basis the combined effect of liquefaction and dry sand consolidation could potentially range up to ¾ inch of differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 50 ft. Impact GEO-1: The geotechnical investigation concludes there is a 20 ft. thick non- liquifiable cap that will protect the proposed residential project from ground failure associated with liquefaction that has been forecasted at depths ranging between 21.3 to 49.1 ft. below the grounds surface. The cap itself contains sand beds that are deemed to be non-liquefiable based on the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) logs. The forecasted estimates of settlement associated with liquefaction were based on engineering properties of the alluvial deposits penetrated in CPT-1 and CPT-3. Additional evaluation of liquefaction potential is warranted to address the following:  Analysis of liquefaction potential of the alluvial deposits penetrated by CPT- 2.  On the basis of CPT data alone, the sand beds within the non-liquefiable cap were considered to be too cohesive or too dense to liquefy. Best evidence would be logging of at least three auger borings, recording Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) blow counts, determining the depth to the water table, sampling of sands, and laboratory testing (i.e., moisture content, dry density, gradation, etc.), followed by and evaluation of liquefaction potential using an SPT methodology compliant with standards for projects located in the Seismic Hazard Zone. This approach would provide additional data to confirm/ modify the consultant’s preliminary interpretation of cap thickness. Mitigation Measure GEO-1a: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide an updated geotechnical report for the review and approval by the County’s Geologist and the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD). The scope of the geotechnical update report shall include logging of a minimum of at least three auger borings that are approximately 25 ft. deep, each. Provide adequate data on the engineering properties of the sand layers within the non-liquefiable cap (i.e., within approximately 20 ft. of the ground surface). If this screening investigation encountered sands that were considered to be possible candidates for liquefaction, the liquefaction potential of this cap sands shall be performed. Mitigation Measure GEO-1b: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide evaluation liquefaction potential of sands penetrated in CPT-2. Additionally, estimate the amount of dry consolidation settlement for CPT-2. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 26 iv) Landslides? (Less than Significant Impact) The Safety Element of the General Plan includes four policies that pertain to lands considered to be located within an area where liquefaction related hazards are present. These policy indicate that (i) project approvals are contingent on geologic and engineering studies which define and delineate the potential hazard posed by liquefaction, (ii) the geotechnical/ engineering geologic report for the project shall provide recommendations to reduce risks to less-than-significant, and (iii) through monitoring and testing during the construction period, the geotechnical engineer/ engineering geologist that ensure that their recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented by the contractor. Since there are no landslides indicated on the site by mapping of the USGS, and because the official SHZ map indicates that site is not considered to be at risk of earthquake- triggered landslide displacement, the risks of landslide related ground failure are not substantial for this project. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation) According to the Soil Survey of Contra Costa County, the soil series mapped on the site is the Antioch loam (AdA; 0-2% slopes). 1 It is a non-prime agricultural soil (Class IV) with a Storie Index rating of 38. The primary limitations for agricultural use are nutrient level and alkali content. Regarding engineering properties, the expansivity of the soil varies with depth. Specifically, the AdA soil profile is 60 inches deep. The A-horizon extends from the surface to a depth of 17 inches, and it is only slightly expansive. The B1-horizon, extending from 17-36 inches, is rated highly expansive; and the B2-horizon, from 36-60 inches, is rated moderately expansive. With respect to the corrosion potential, the entire soil profile is rated highly corrosive. Expansive soils are soils that expand when water is added and shrink when they dry out. This continuous change in soils volume can cause homes and other structures to move unevenly and crack. It should also be recognized that corrosive soils tend to damage concrete and/or uncoated metal (steel) that is in contact with the ground. Design-level geotechnical reports typically provide laboratory test data to characterize soil conditions and provide at least a preliminary assessment of the expansion and corrosion potential of soils. Impact GEO-2: The geotechnical report prepared for the project presented laboratory test data indicating the surface soils are expansive. Mitigation Measure GEO-2: The applicant shall provide additional design details on the mitigation of expansive soils (i.e., recommendations) addressing (a) thickness of the import 1 Welch, L.E. et. al., 1977, Soil Survey of Contra Costa County, California, USDA Soil Conservation Service Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 27 fill material on building pads, (b) the project geotechnical engineer shall approve any import brought to the site, (c) the import shall not be more expansive or more corrosive than the native soils on the site, (d) specify the final grades recommended within approximately 3 ft. of the foundation to achieve compliance with the intent of the geotechnical engineers recommendation that positive drainage be provided to direct water away from the foundation, and (e) include a report from the corrosion protection engineer as an appendix to the Updated Geotechnical Report. It shall include test results; analysis of the data gathered and provide design recommendations to mitigate the hazard posed by corrosive soils. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2 would reduce any impacts to a less than significant level. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) TRC identified the need to evaluate the corrosion potential of native soils on the project site. The scope of their investigation included collecting of two samples for laboratory testing to evaluate the corrosion potential. The samples were collected at the CPT-2 probe site at a depth of 2 ft.; and at the CPT-3 probe site at a depth of 3½ ft. The data gathered allows TRC to provide a preliminary assessment of the corrosion potential of soils on the project site. Impact GEO-3: The Geotechnical Report prepared presented laboratory test data indicating potential corrosion of soils. Mitigation Measure GEO-3a: The Updated Geotechnical Report shall include a citation to the project plans and shall comment on their compliance with geotechnical recommendations and specifications. Mitigation Measure GEO-3b: The Updated Geotechnical Report shall comment on grading and drainage plans for the project, including the citing and design of the Stormwater C.3 basins. If they are available, provide comments on the foundation plans and associated exhibits. Mitigation Measure GEO-3c: The project geotechnical engineer shall provide adequate observation services to confirm that their foundation, final grading, and drainage recommendations have been implemented, as well as backfilling of utility trenches and construction of the private roads and flatwork. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 28 d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) To mitigate the effects of expansive soils, TRC recommends use of non-expansive import fill for on building pads and use of a reinforced mat foundation system. Specific standards and criteria are presented in the TRC report that address both earthwork (pgs. 8-9) and foundations (pgs. 12- 16). Additionally, TRC has recommended that (i) the structural engineer for the project to design foundations to accommodate the anticipated settlement, (ii) that roof gutter water be collected in a closed conduit and taken to an acceptable discharge point, (iii) that positive drainage be provided to direct water away from residential foundations, and (iv) avoid use of pressurize irrigate lines for any landscaped areas that are adjacent to building foundations. TRC states that the resistivity testing indicates the soils to be very severely corrosive, although water-soluble sulphate ion concentrations appear to indicate that the corrosion hazard associated with sulfates to be negligible. Given that the water table on the site is relatively near the surface, TRC recommends there is a significant corrosion potential to metallic objects that are in contact with the ground. TRC has recommended that the developer retain a corrosion protection engineer to determine if additional testing is needed, and/or provide corrosion protection measures for buried metallic materials (underground utility lines, fire hydrant risers, etc.) Mitigation Measures are recommended to avoid / control damage from expansive soil, including (a) import of non-expansive fill for use on the building pads and (b) use of a reinforced concrete post tension slab foundation system. The geotechnical engineer’s conceptual approach to mitigation of the adverse soil conditions is clear. However, some further design details are needed in the Updated Geotechnical Report. Implementation of mitigation measure GEO-2 will address potential impacts to soil expansion, which would be reduced to a less than significant level. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is not currently served by the Delta-Diablo Sanitary District. However, the applicant will need to annex into the Delta-Diablo district. Furthermore, there will be no septic systems proposed for the project. f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Less than Significant w ith Mitigation) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 29 The possible opportunity for fossil material to be exposed would occur during trenching for utility lines (including storm drainage, sewers, domestic water, electrical and TV cable). Trenches would likely penetrate native soils and the underlying alluvium. Therefore, the role of the paleontologist (or archaeologist) would be limited to providing monitoring services during trenching operations. Standard CDD practice is to require that work shall stop if such materials are uncovered during grading, trenching, or other onsite earthwork until a certified paleontologist has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation as deemed necessary. Nevertheless, the following mitigation measure will address any unexpected discovery or find which may occur during the construction phase of the project. Impact GEO-4: Unexpected discovery or find may occur during the construction phase of the project. Mitigation Measure GEO-4: The following General Notes shall be placed on Sheets that show drainage improvements and utility improvements. • The underground/ grading contractor shall provide a minimum of 24-hour notice to the entity charged with providing the monitoring services. • The entity that is providing the monitoring service shall be identified (name of firm, mailing address, phone number, and email). Sources of Information • TRC. 2021. Geotechnical Investigation Loreto Bay Estates, Pullman Avenue and Fairview Avenue, Bay Pint California dated June 3, 2021. • Welch, L.E. et. al., 1977, Soil Survey of Contra Costa County, California, USDA Soil Conservation Service • Darwin Myers Associates, County Geologist. 2021. Geologic Peer Review for County File #SD20-9545 dated April 2, 2021. • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Safety Element. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 30 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? SUMMARY: a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) Greenhouse gases are gases that trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to global climate change. Greenhouse gases include gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and various fluorocarbons commonly found in aerosol sprays. Typically, a single residential or commercial construction project in the County would not generate enough greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to substantially change the global average temperature; however, the accumulation of GHG emissions from all projects both within the County and outside the County has contributed and will contribute to global climate change. Senate Bill 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop CEQA Guidelines for evaluation of GHG emissions impacts and recommend mitigation strategies. In response, OPR released the Technical Advisory: CEQA and Climate Change, and proposed revisions to the State CEQA guidelines (April 14, 2009) for consideration of GHG emissions. The California Natural Resources Agency adopted the proposed State CEQA Guidelines revisions on December 30, 2009 and the revisions were effective beginning March 18, 2010. The bright-line numeric threshold of 1,100 MT CO2/yr is a numeric emissions level below which a project’s contribution to global climate change would be less than “cumulatively considerable.” This emissions rate is equivalent to a project size of an approximately 541,000-square-foot industrial use. Future construction of 15 single-family residences and related improvements would create some GHG emissions; however, the amount generated would be below the above-noted emission rate and not result in a significant adverse environmental impact. As the project does not exceed the screening criteria, the project would not result in the generation of GHG emissions that exceed the threshold of significance. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 31 At a regional scale, the BAAQMD adopted the Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan that addresses GHG emissions as well as various criteria air pollutants. The BAAQMD Plan included a number of pollutant reduction strategies for the San Francisco Bay air basin, many of which would be included in the project through Title 24 energy efficiency requirement for the expected new residences. Within Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors convened a Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) in May 2005, to identify existing County activities and policies that could reduce GHG emissions. In November 2005, the CCWG presented its Climate Protection Report to the Board of Supervisors, which included a list of existing and potential GHG reduction measures. This led to the quantification of relevant County information on GHGs in the December 2008 Municipal Climate Action Plan. In April 2012, the Board directed the Department of Conservation and Development to prepare a Climate Action Plan (CAP) to address the reduction of GHG emissions in the unincorporated areas of the County. In December 2015, the Climate Action Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The Climate Action Plan includes a number of GHG emission reduction strategies. The strategies include measures such as implementing standards for green buildings and energy- efficient buildings, reducing parking requirements, and reducing waste disposal. Green building codes and debris recovery programs are among the strategies currently implemented by the County. The project does not conflict with the policies outlined in the CAP. The project will incorporate Contra Costa County Climate Action Plan (CCC) emission reduction measures (as referenced in Appendix E “Developer Checklist” of the CCC). The checklist will be submitted to the Community Development Division prior to issuance of a building permit for each residence. Implementation of these emission reduction measures is considered a Qualified GHG Reduction Strategy under the CCC and therefore meets the BAAQMD’s GHG threshold. The project would not conflict with the CAP and therefore would not be considered to have a significant impact. Sources of Information • Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. • Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Air Quality Guidelines. • Contra Costa County. Title 8: Zoning Ordinance. • Contra Costa County. 2008. Municipal Climate Action Plan. • Contra Costa County. 2015. Climate Action Plan. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 32 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? SUMMARY: a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Less than Significant) The project site is a vacant lot and there will be no demolition of buildings. However, during construction, both within the project site and within the areas proposed for the off-site improvements, the proposed project would be expected to involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, such as diesel fuels, aerosols, and paints. The proposed project would be subject to the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, California Public Resources Code, and other State and local regulations that would reduce and limit the associated risks. Any handling, Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 33 transporting, use, or disposal would comply with applicable laws, policies, and programs set forth by various federal, State, and local agencies and regulations. During project operations, hazardous materials may be handled on the project site. Because of the nature of the project, hazardous materials used on-site may vary but would likely be limited to small quantities of fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, solvents, cleaning agents, and similar materials used for daily residential operations and maintenance activities. These types of materials are common for residential developments such as the project and represent a low risk to people and the environment when used as intended. Further, compliance with applicable plans and regulations, would provide public protection from hazards associated with the use, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous substances. Therefore, operational impacts related to public hazard risk as a result of hazardous materials transport, use, or disposal would be less than significant. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) Construction activity would be expected to involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, such as diesel fuels, aerosols, and paints. The use of these materials would be subject to the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, California Public Resources Code, and other State and local regulations that would limit the use of hazardous materials and reduce the associated risks of exposure. Any handling, transporting, use, or disposal would comply with applicable laws, policies, and programs set forth by various federal, State, and local agencies and regulations, including the Environmental Protection Agency, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Caltrans, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, and the Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials Program. Therefore, construction impacts related to hazardous materials upset risk would be less than significant. The project proposes construction of 15 residences and related subdivision improvements, landscaping, and open space. As such, the proposed project would not be expected to include industrial or retail development that involves hazardous materials such as gas stations, paint stores, or auto parts stores. Unlike industrial or retail facilities, residential development does not involve the type or quantity of hazardous materials that could pose a significant environmental accident. Small quantities of hazardous materials would be used on-site during operation of the project, but not in sufficient quantities to create significant hazard in the unlikely event of upset or accident. These types of materials are common in such residential projects and represent a low risk to people and the environment when used as intended and would not be expected to result Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 34 in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. As such, operational impacts related to hazardous materials upset risk would be less than significant. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (No Impact) There are no existing or proposed schools located within a quarter mile of the project site. The closest schools to the site are Willow Cove Elementary School, located at 1880 Hanlon Way, in Pittsburg and Bel Air Elementary School, located at 663 Canal Road, in Bay Point. Willow Cove Elementary is approximately 0.69 miles southeast of the project site and Bel Aire Elementary School is 0.68 miles south of the project site. Thus, construction and operational impacts related to hazardous emissions proximate to a school would be less than significant. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (No Impact) Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese) maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the project site is not categorized as a hazardous materials site. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? (No Impact) The project site is located approximately 6.84 miles northeast from the Buchanan Field Airport. There would be no safety hazard or excessive noise related to a public airport or public use airport. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is accessed from Pullman Avenue in Bay Point. Willow Pass Road is parallel to Pullman Avenue. There are a number of streets off of Willow Pass Road that are perpendicular and would end at Pullman Avenue going north. The project will provide two access points from Pullman Avenue to serve the 15 lots. The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD) has reviewed the project plans and provided routine comments for the site. The project site is designed in accordance with the CCCFPD’s and the County’s standards to accommodate emergency vehicle access by providing two points of access that would be available to emergency vehicles. The Fire Protection District would review the construction drawings for the project at the time of submittal of a building permit application. Thus, project impacts related to emergency response and evacuation would be less than significant. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 35 g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is located within a “Urban Unzoned” Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) in a Local Responsibility Area as indicated in the County’s mapping system in Accela. The fire hazard severity zones reflect the degree of severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in the area. The construction of the new residences would be subject to building standards required for structures within “Urban Unzoned” Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The building standard for the Fire Hazard Severity Zones would be enforced as the project goes through the plan checking process with the Building Inspection Division and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. As the project will comply with these standards, there would be a less than significant risk of loss, injury or death involving exposure of people or structures to wildland fires. Sources of Information • County’s Mapping System in Accela. Accessed June 2022. • Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List – “Cortese List.” Accessed June 2022. • Contra Costa County. 2000. Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. • Contra Costa County General Plan. 2005-2020. Transportation and Circulation Element. • Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated September 2, 2021. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 36 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? SUMMARY: a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would comply with applicable water quality and discharge requirements. Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and 16 incorporated cities in the county have formed the Contra Costa Clean Water Program. In October 2009, the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB) adopted the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Regional Permit for the Program, which regulates discharges from municipal storm drains. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 37 Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit places requirements on site design to minimize creation of impervious surfaces and control stormwater runoff. The County has the authority to enforce compliance with its Municipal Regional Permit through the County’s adopted C.3 requirements. The C.3 requirements stipulate that projects creating and/or redeveloping at least 10,000 square feet of impervious surface shall treat stormwater runoff with permanent stormwater management facilities, along with measures to control runoff rates and volumes. Due to the potential impervious areas that would be created for to the residential and access improvements on the site (approximately 54,553 square feet), this project triggers threshold requiring submittal of a Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP). The SWCP prepared for the proposed project identifies Low Impact Development (LID) design strategies that optimizes site layout, use of permeable pavements, dispersal of runoff to pervious areas, and bioretention or other Integrated Management Practices. The applicant provided Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan dated October 2021 that is deemed to be preliminarily complete, however, it remains subject to future revision, as necessary, during preparation of improvement plans to bring it into full compliance with C.3 stormwater requirements. With implementation of the practicable stormwater controls, the project would be compliant with applicable water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, resulting in a less than significant impact. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would have new impervious surfaces of approximately 54,553 square feet. However, the proposed project would incorporate LID techniques as described in the SWCP, some of which allows natural filtration into project soils and naturally recharge ground water. The proposed project would not interfere substantially with groundwater supply, recharge, or groundwater management. Therefore, potential impacts related to the groundwater recharge and supply would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (Less than Significant Impact) Division 914 of the County Ordinance Code requires that all storm water entering and/or originating on this property to be collected and conveyed, without diversion and within an Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 38 adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having a definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm water to an adequate natural watercourse. The site generally slopes towards the north. A 30-inch storm drain, Line B of Drainage Area 48D, is located along the northern property line. Line B ultimately discharges into the Delta. The proposed development of DA 48D the project site was originally zoned as light industrial, and Line B was sized accordingly. The project proposes a less dense use therefore the receiving system is adequate to handle runoff from the development. Four bioretention basins are proposed to capture and treat the stormwater runoff. All bioretention basins will then discharge into the storm drain system located north easterly of the project along the railroad property. No runoff will be directly discharged to the drainage systems outside of the project site. As such, the proposed project would result in a less than significant impact regarding erosion or siltation on- or off-site. ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would comply with regulations of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit consistent with Division 1014 of the Ordinance Code. The site generally slopes towards the north. A 30-inch storm drain, Line B of Drainage Area 48D, is located along the northern property line. Line B ultimately discharges into the Delta. For the proposed development of DA 48D the project site was originally zoned as light industrial, and Line B was sized accordingly. The project proposes a less dense use therefore the receiving system is adequate to handle runoff from the development. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial on- or off-site flooding. iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed development of DA 48D the project site was originally zoned as light industrial, and Line B was sized accordingly. The project proposes a less dense use therefore the receiving system is adequate to handle runoff from the development. Four bioretention basins are proposed to capture and treat the stormwater runoff. All bioretention basins will then discharge into the storm drain system located north easterly of the project along the railroad property. No runoff will be directly discharged to the drainage systems outside of the project site. Accordingly, the proposed project would not exceed the capacity of the stormwater system. iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 39 According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project is not located in area that is within a Special Flood Hazard Area. Furthermore, the improvements on the site are not expected to create any barrier that would impede or redirect flood flows, should flooding occur. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? (Less than Significant Impact) The property does not lie within the Special Flood Hazard Area (100-year flood boundary) as designated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. The project site is not located near the ocean, and as such would not be susceptible to inundation from a tsunami. The project site is not immediately located near a large, enclosed body of water and as such would not be susceptible to inundation from a seiche. As a result, the project site would not be a risk for inundation from flooding, tsunami, or seiche. Therefore, impacts related to risk of pollutant release due to inundation would be less than significant. e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? (Less than Significant Impact) As stated above, the proposed project would comply with applicable water quality and discharge requirements. Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit places requirements on site design to minimize creation of impervious surfaces and control stormwater runoff. The Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) prepared for the proposed project includes stormwater controls as required by the Contra Costa Clean Water Program and Municipal Regional Permit. Thus, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. 2022. Staff Report and Conditions of Approval dated June 21, 2022. • Sharatchandra Bandugula. October 2021. Storm Water Control Plan for Loreto Bay Estates, Contra Costa County, California. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 40 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? SUMMARY: a) Would the project physically divide an established community? (No Impact) The subject property is a vacant lot. The surrounding properties to the west, south, and further east are primarily residential uses. Directly north of the subject property is the UPRR railroad and further north is the BNSF railroad. The project proposes 15 residences with two access points to the project site from Pullman Avenue. Thus, the project would not physically divide any of the nearby communities, or even adversely impact the manner in which people enter or exit those communities. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH). The SH designation allows for densities between 5.0 – 7.2 units per net acre. Primary land uses permitted in this designation include detached single-family homes and accessory buildings and structures. The proposed project would subdivide the property into 15 residential lots on a net acre of 2.41 or a density of 6.0 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the general plan. The project also includes the rezoning of property from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-1), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to a Planned Unit District (P-1) and a preliminary and final development plan that proposes the standards for this development. The proposed project would result in 15 lots ranging in size from 3,821 – 6,114 square feet. The residences will range in living area from approximately 1,829 – 2,559 square feet and consist of one and two-stories buildings. In rezoning the approximately 2.88-acre site to a P-1 requires a minimum of five acres. As such, the project includes a variance to the minimum lot size required to rezone the project site to P-1. The project is also subject to the County’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and has elected to pay the in-lieu fee. The project also proposes the removal of five code-protected trees. Replanting of trees will be required. Overall, the project would not conflict with applicable land use plans, Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 41 policies, or regulations of the Contra Costa County General Plan or the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code that were adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan. 2005-2020. Land Use Element. • Contra Costa County. Title 8 – Zoning Ordinance. • Traverso Tree. November 23, 2021. Tree Inventory for Loreto Bay, Fairview Avenue & Pullman Avenue, Bay Point. 12. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (No Impact) Pursuant to Figure 8-4 (Mineral Resource Areas) of the County General Plan, the project site is not located within any area of the County identified as a significant mineral resource area. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed project resulting in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (No Impact) Pursuant to Figure 8-4 (Mineral Resource Areas) of the County General Plan, the project site is not located within any area of the County identified as a significant mineral resource area. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed project resulting in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020, Conservation Element. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 42 13. NOISE – Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation) The Noise Element of the Contra Costa County General Plan discusses the County’s goal to improve the overall environment in the County by reducing annoying and physically harmful levels of noise for existing and future residents, and for all land uses. According to the Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments chart (Figure 11-6) in the County General Plan, environments with ambient noise levels of up to 60 dBA (decibels) Ldn (day night average sound level) are considered “normally acceptable” and noise levels between 55 dB to 70 dB are “conditionally acceptable” in single-family residential areas. Pursuant to Policy 11-4 of the Noise Element, an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA Ldn or less for single-family residential development. According to the County’s GIS and the County’s General Plan Noise Contour map (Figure 11-5C), the subject property is located within a noise level of 60 dBA. The major noise sources affecting the project site are vehicular traffic along the local roadway network south of the project site and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) line and a Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway directly north of the project site. Pullman Avenue is along the frontage of the property. Vehicular traffic generated by the 15 proposed residences in the project, along with noise typically associated with single-family residences (e.g., yard maintenance, recreation, etc.), would increase noise levels in the vicinity of the project site. However, the types and levels of noise generated from the 15 proposed residences in the subdivision would be similar to noise levels from the Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 43 existing residential developments in the area, and therefore, the impact on ambient noise levels in the vicinity would be less than significant. According to the Noise Study prepared by Saxelby Acoustics LLC dated October 22, 2021, exterior noise levels at the proposed residential uses are predicted to be 61 dBA Ldn or less. This falls under the “Conditionally Acceptable” range as indicated under Figure 11-6 (Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments) of the County’s General Plan Noise Element. For this range, the County requires building construction to be analyzed to ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dBA Ldn. Modern building construction methods typically yield an exterior-to-interior noise level reduction of 25 dBA. Therefore, where exterior noise levels are 70 dBA Ldn, or less, no additional interior noise control measures are typically required. For this project, exterior noise levels are predicted to be less than 61 dBA Ldn, resulting in an interior noise level of less than 36 dBA Ldn based on typical building construction. In addition, the California Building Code requires an interior noise level standard of 45 dBA Ldn. Therefore, no additional noise control measures would be required to meet the County’s interior noise level standard. During project grading and construction there may be periods of time where there would be loud noise from construction equipment, vehicles, and tools. Although grading and construction activities would be temporary, such activities could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact during project construction. Consequently, the project proponent is required to implement the noise mitigation measure NOI-1 to bring potential noise impacts to a less than significant level. Impact NOI-1: Construction related activities could generate a temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project. Mitigation Measure NOI-1: The following noise reduction measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be included on all construction plans. 1. Unless specifically approved otherwise via prior authorization from the Zoning Administrator, all construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on State and Federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the State or Federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 44 President’s Day (State) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Juneteenth National Independence Holiday (Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For specific details on the actual day the State and Federal holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal Holidays: Federal Holidays (opm.gov) California Holidays: http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutftb/holidays.shtml 2. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project-related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to uses on the site. This shall be communicated to all project-related contractors. 3. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. 4. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are imposed on construction activities, except that the hours shall be limited to weekdays between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. and prohibited on State and Federal holidays. b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Less than Significant Impact) Project construction activities includes minimal grading of approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill that will be balanced on-site. Grading will occur temporarily at the site during construction and the amount of ground borne vibration or noise generated by the project will be less than significant. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 45 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (No Impact) As discussed in Section 9.e, the project site is located approximately 6.84 miles northeast from the from the Buchanan Field Airport. Thus, the project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan. 2005-2020. Noise Element. • Bellecci & Associates, Inc. 2022. Loreto Bay Estates Tentative Map dated March 31, 2022. • Saxelby Acoustics LLC. 2021. Environmental Noise Assessment Loreto Bay Residential dated October 22, 2021. 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SUMMARY: a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would result in the construction of 15 single-family residences, resulting in approximately 43 persons. This amount is a non-substantial increase in the population. The subject property is proposed for a rezoning to a Planned Unit District. The proposed uses for this district would allow for residential uses and the project is consistent with the County’s General Plan. Therefore, the potential to induce a substantial unplanned population growth, either directly or indirectly, would be less than significant. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Less than Significant Impact) The subject property is a vacant lot. The proposed project consists of constructing 15 single-family residences that will provide the much-needed housing to the area. The project is also subject to Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 46 the County’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and has elected to pay the in-lieu fee. Therefore, the project has no potential for displacing any existing housing or people. Sources of Information • California Department of Finance 2021. • Contra Costa County. Title 8 – Zoning Ordinance. • Bellecci & Associates, Inc. 2022. Loreto Bay Estates Tentative Map dated March 31, 2022. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES – Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire Protection? b) Police Protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? SUMMARY: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire Protection? (Less than Significant Impact) Fire protection and emergency medical response services for the project vicinity are provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Fire protection to the project site would be provided by Station No. 86 located at 3000 Willow Pass Road in Bay Point (approximately 0.62 miles of driving distance to the site). Using an average travel speed of 35 miles per hour, an engine responding from Station No. 86 would take approximately 1 minute 4 seconds to reach the project site, which is under the five-minute response standard set by the County General Plan. In addition, as detailed in the comment letter for the proposed project from the Fire District, the project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of the California Fire Code, the California Building Code, and applicable Contra Costa County Ordinances that pertain to emergency access, fire suppression systems, and fire detection/warning systems. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the construction drawings would be reviewed and approved by the fire district. All homes will be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system. As a result, potential impacts of the proposed project relating to fire protection would be less than significant. b) Police Protection? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 47 Police protection services in the project vicinity are provided by the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office, which provides patrol service to the Bay Point area. The County General Plan Policy 7-57 indicates a Sheriff facility standard of 155 square feet of Sheriff station space per 1,000 persons of population. The proposed project would increase the population of unincorporated Contra Costa County by approximately 43 persons, which is less than the facility standard and is a non- substantial increase. Thus, the addition of 15 single-family residences to the project area would not significantly affect the provision of police services to the area. c) Schools? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is within the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. The average size of a household in the Contra Costa County area is approximately 2.85 persons per household. The project consists of 15 single-family residences and would result in approximately 43 persons. Conservatively, an estimated 1 in 3 persons per household may be children between the ages of five to 19. The project would result in approximately 14 school-age children. This increase of 14 students would not significantly impact the district. Furthermore, the applicant would be required to pay school impact fees to the Mt. Diablo Unified, which would assist to expand facilities to address increased demand. d) Parks? (Less than Significant Impact) The average size of a household in the Contra Costa County area is approximately 2.85 persons per household. The proposed project would increase the population by approximately 43 persons. As a result, there would be an increase in use of parks in the surrounding area. These parks provide recreational facilities such as playgrounds, picnic and barbecue areas, and youth and adult recreational programs. A Park Impact Fee is required to be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit. Additionally, the project includes a common open space area to be used as a park by the residents of the 15 lots. The open space area is approximately 3,544 square feet and is identified as Parcel C. Given the project’s negligible addition to the population, the impacts of the proposed project on parks would be less than significant. e) Other public facilities? (Less than Significant Impact) Libraries: The Contra Costa Library operates 28 facilities in Contra Costa County, including the Bay Point Library at 205 Pacifica Avenue in Bay Point (approximately 1.64 miles driving distance). The Contra Costa Library system is primarily funded by local property taxes, with additional revenue from intergovernmental sources. A portion of the property taxes on the project site will contribute to Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 48 the Contra Costa Library system. Accordingly, the impact of the use of the public libraries by the residents of the 15 lots created would be less than significant. Health Facilities: The Contra Costa County Health Services Department (CCCHSD) operates a regional medical center (hospital) and 11 health centers and clinics in the County. County health facilities generally serve low income and uninsured patients. CCCHSD is primarily funded by federal and state funding programs, with additional revenue from local taxes, including a portion of the taxes on the project site. Thus, the impact of the use of public health facilities by the residents of the 15 lots created would be less than significant. Sources of Information • California Department of Finance 2021. • Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated September 2, 2021. 16. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SUMMARY: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project involves a subdivision of a 2.88-acre project site into 15 residential lots. The population in the project area would be increased by approximately 43 persons. This population growth could incrementally increase use of parks and recreational facilities in the area. However, the negligible increase in population is not expected to impact recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated. The 15 new single-family residences are also subject to a Park Impact Fee, paid by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit. Additionally, the proposed project includes an on-site common Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 49 open space area on Parcel C for use by the new residents of the 15 lots. Therefore, the increase in use of the parks and recreational facilities would be less than significant. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) As described above, use of public recreational facilities by potential new residents would incrementally increase use of existing facilities, but would not result in the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Furthermore, the proposed project includes an on-site common open space area on Parcel C for use by the new residents of the 15 lots. Sources of Information • California Department of Finance 2021. 17. TRANSPORTATION – Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? SUMMARY: a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? (Less than Significant Impact) Policy 4-c of the Growth Management Element of the General Plan requires a traffic impact analysis of any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more additional AM or PM peak-hour trips. The proposed project consisting of a 15-lot subdivision would generate an estimated 11 AM and 15 PM peak-hour trips, and therefore, is not required to have a project-specific traffic impact analysis. Since the project would yield less than 100 peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would not conflict with the circulation system in the Bay Point area. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 50 The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is responsible for ensuring local government conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP), a program aimed at reducing regional traffic congestion. The CMP requires that each local jurisdiction identify existing and future transportation facilities that will operate below an acceptable service level and provide mitigation where future growth degrades that service level. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority has review responsibility for proposed development projects that are expected to generate 100 or more additional peak-hours trips. As the project would yield less than 100 additional peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would not conflict with the CMP and would result in a less than significant impact. The site is located north of Pullman Avenue, a County maintained road. Pullman Avenue is approximately 32 feet paved within a 52-foot right of way. The applicant would not be required to dedicate additional right of way or further widen the pavement along Pullman Avenue. However, the applicant will be required to install concrete curb ramps, curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk (width measured from face of curb), longitudinal and transverse drainage, and street lighting, as necessary, along the project frontage. Many of these improvements have already been installed but may need to be modified to accommodate the proposed onsite improvements. The proposed subdivision will gain access via two private roads off Pullman Avenue. Street “B” is located north of the intersections of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue and Street “A” is located north of the intersection of Gibson Avenue and Pullman Avenue. Both roads will have a paved width of 20 feet with right of way width varying from 25 feet to 30 feet. Both streets end in a hammerhead turnaround near the northern property line. The goal of the CCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (CBPP) is to encourage biking and walking through improvements to the countywide bicycle and pedestrian network. The CBPP identifies the existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities network throughout Contra Costa County. The 2018 CBPP3, the most recent version of the plan, reflects the latest state and local policies, standards, and best practices for bicycle and pedestrian projects. The 2018 CBPP identifies a Low-Stress Countywide Bikeway Network. The project would not conflict with future implementation of a Class I off-street separated path that would run in its vicinity, as identified in the 2018 CBPP. The County’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance requires a residential project with 13 or more units to develop a TDM program. Since the project involves 15 lots, submittal of a TDM Program would be required for the review and approval of the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division, prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. Overall, the project will not interfere with existing transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities and therefore, would have a less-than-significant impact. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 51 b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)? (Less than Significant) In analyzing land use projects under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. On June 23, 2020, in compliance with SB 743 (2013), the Board of Supervisors adopted Transportation Analysis Guidelines (TAG)1, which defines the County’s approach to analyzing VMT impacts from certain projects. As a result of SB 743, VMT is the metric used to define transportation impacts in a CEQA review. The VMT screening criteria for projects consisting of 20 residential or less will not require a VMT analysis. The proposed project consisting of a 15-lot subdivision, which would generate an estimated 11 AM and 15 PM peak-hour trips. Therefore, the project is not required to have a project-specific traffic impact analysis. Since the project would yield less than 100 peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact and would not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Less than Significant Impact) The site is located north of Pullman Avenue, a County maintained road. Pullman Avenue is approximately 32 feet paved within a 52-foot right of way. The applicant will not be required to dedicate additional right of way along or further widen the pavement along Pullman Avenue. However, the applicant will be required to install concrete curb ramps, curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk (width measured from face of curb), longitudinal and transverse drainage, and street lighting, as necessary, along the project frontage. Many of these improvements have already been installed but may need to be modified to accommodate the proposed onsite improvements. Based on the vesting tentative map, the subdivision will gain access via two private roads off Pullman Avenue. Street “B” is located north of the intersections of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue and Street “A” is located north of the intersection of Gibson Avenue and Pullman Avenue. Both roads will have a paved width of 20 feet with right of way width varying from 25 feet to 30 feet. Both streets end in a hammerhead turnaround near the northern property line. As indicated in their letter dated September 2, 2021, the CCCFPD concluded that site access a turnaround area as shown on the site plan appear to comply with the Fire District’s requirement. As such, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? (Less than Significant Impact) The site plan was reviewed by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD) in September 2021. As indicated in their letter dated September 2, 2021, the CCCFPD concluded that Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 52 site access a turnaround area as shown on the site plan appear to comply with the Fire District’s requirement. As such, impacts would be less than significant. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan. 2005-2020. Transportation and Circulation Element. • Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. 2022. Staff Report and Conditions of Approval dated June 21, 2022 • Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated September 2, 2021. 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? SUMMARY: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) As discussed in the Cultural Resources section of this Initial Study, no historical resources are known to exist on the project site. Further, according to the County’s Archaeological Sensitivities Map, Figure 9-2, of the County General Plan, the subject site is located in an area that is considered “largely urbanized area.” Given all of these factors, there is little potential for the project to impact cultural resources on the site. Nevertheless, the expected construction and grading would cause ground disturbance which may impact heretofore undocumented cultural resources. However, Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 53 implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce this impact during project related work to a level that would be considered less than significant. Impact TRIBAL CUL-1: The project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). The expected construction and grading could cause ground disturbance which may impact heretofore undocumented cultural resources. Pursuant to Section 21080.3.1 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC), correspondence detailing the proposed project was provided to the Wilton Rancheria Indian Tribe on April 13, 2022. The correspondence formally notified the Wilton Rancheria Indian Tribe of their opportunity to request consultation with the County regarding the potential for the project impacting tribal cultural resources, as defined in Section 21074 of PRC. The Tribe indicated in their correspondence they had no concern regarding the project. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less than significant potential for the proposed project impacting tribal cultural resources. The project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). The expected construction and grading could cause ground disturbance which may impact heretofore undocumented cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce the impact to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? (Less than Significant with Mitigation) A memo prepared by the Northwest Information Center dated September 15, 2021 indicates that previous studies were prepared for the project area. There were two studies prepared, Study #30192 (Allan 2005) and Study #19778 (Eastman 1997) that identified no cultural resources within the project area. Based on the results of Study #30192 (Allan 2005), the project area has a low Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 54 possibility of containing unrecorded archeological site(s). No further study for archaeological resources is recommended. While unlikely, subsurface construction activities always have the potential to damage or destroy previously undiscovered historic resources such as wood, stone, foundations, and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; and deposits of wood, glass, ceramics, and other refuse, if encountered. This would represent a potentially significant impact related to historic resources. Impact TRIBAL CUL-1: The project could potentially significant impact related to historic resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce the impact to undiscovered historical resources to a less than significant level. Sources of Information • Contra Costa County General Plan 2005-2020. Open Space Element. • Wilton Rancheria. 2022. Tribal Consultation Letter dated April 13, 2022 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 55 e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SUMMARY: a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Less than Significant Impact) There is a 15-inch sewer main running along Pullman and another sewer main 20-inch running behind the project site, parallel to the railroad tracks. Both sewer mains run into the district’s sewer trunk line for this area, about 400 feet from the project site. The project site is not currently served by Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) and would need to be annexed into the district. The applicant has initiated the process to annex the project site into the district for the 15 lots. Prior to the submittal of building permits, DDSD will review the submittal for conformance with their development standards and will require any potential upgrades at that time. By meeting the development standards of DDSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by existing DDSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system. The site generally slopes towards the north. A 30-inch storm drain, Line B of Drainage Area 48D, is located along the northern property line. Line B ultimately discharges into the Delta. The proposed development of DA 48D the project site was originally zoned as light industrial, and Line B was sized accordingly. Four bioretention basins are proposed to capture and treat the stormwater runoff. All bioretention basins will then discharge into the storm drain system located north easterly of the project along the railroad property. No runoff will be directly discharged to the drainage systems outside of the project site. The project proposes a less dense use and therefore, the receiving system is adequate to handle runoff from the development. Expanded service for 15 proposed residences would not require construction of new off-site wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site currently receives water service from the Golden State Water District (GSWD). The project shall be submitted to and reviewed by GSWD, and, by meeting the development standards of GSWD, the proposed project could be expected to be accommodated by existing water facilities Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 56 without expansion of the existing system. Accordingly, the impact of providing water service to the proposed project would be less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? (Less than Significant Impact) There is a 15-inch sewer main running along Pullman and another sewer main 20-inch running behind the project site, parallel to the railroad tracks. Both sewer mains run into the district’s sewer trunk line for this area, about 400 feet from the project site. The project site is not currently served by Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) and would need to be annexed into the district. The applicant has initiated the process to annex the project site into the district for the 15 lots. Prior to the submittal of building permits, DDSD will review the submittal for conformance with their development standards and will require any potential upgrades at that time. By meeting the development standards of DDSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by existing DDSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would generate construction solid waste and post-construction residential solid waste. Construction waste in Contra Costa County is diverted away from landfills and recycled through the three established transfer stations in the County. Construction on the project site would be subject to the CalGreen Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Program administered by the CDD at the time of application for a building permit. The Debris Recovery Program would eliminate the construction debris headed to the landfill by diverting materials that can be recycled to appropriate recycling facilities. With respect to residential solid waste, the receiving landfill is the Keller Canyon Landfill, located at 901 Bailey Road in Bay Point. Keller Canyon is estimated to be at 15 percent of capacity. Residential waste from the proposed project would incrementally add to the operational waste headed to the landfill; however, the impact of the project-related residential waste is considered to be less than significant. A portion of the residential waste is expected to be recycled and would thereby reduce the residential waste headed to the landfill. e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project would comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws related to solid waste. The project includes single-family residential land use that would not result in the Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 57 generation of unique types of solid waste that in conflict with existing regulations applicable to solid waste. Furthermore, compliance with CalGreen’s solid waste requirements, such as the Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Program, the project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws related to solid waste. Sources of Information • Bellecci & Associates, Inc. 2022. Loreto Bay Estates Tentative Map dated March 31, 2022. • Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. 2022. Staff Report and Conditions of Approval dated June 21, 2022. • CalRecycle (Webpage) http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Government/default.htm • CalRecycle, Facility/Site Summary Details: Keller Canyon Landfill (07-AA-0032) (Webpage) http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/07-AA-0032/Detail/ Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 58 20. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby, expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? SUMMARY: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is located within a “Urban Unzoned” Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) in a Local Responsibility Area as indicated in the County’s mapping system in Accela. The fire hazard severity zones reflect the degree of severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in the area. The construction of the new residences would be subject to building standards required for structures within “Urban Unzoned” Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The building standard for the Fire Hazard Severity Zones would be enforced as the project goes through the plan checking process with the Building Inspection Division and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Thus, the project would have a less than significant impact b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby, expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (Less than Significant Impact) Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 59 Please refer to the discussion and response for subsection-a above. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (Less than Significant Impact) The project site is currently vacant. However, new electrical power and natural gas lines on site and connecting to the project site would be installed underground, minimizing potential ignition and related fire risk above ground, at the project site according to the California Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and the Contra Costa County General Plan Implementation Measure 7-au. The project plans will be reviewed and approved by the Fire District prior to issuance of a building permit. Lastly, off-site improvements, including frontage sidewalks and driveway curbs would not exacerbate fire risk. Therefore, the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment is less than significant. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? (Less than Significant) A SWCP with C.3 compliant storm water controls including pervious areas, bio-retention basins, and storm drains that would collect storm water was prepared for the project. The C.3 measures would decrease the amount of surface runoff discharged from the site. The County Public Works Department has reviewed the applicant’s preliminary SWCP and determined that drainage facilities in the area could accommodate the increased surface runoff without resulting in flooding. Furthermore, the project site is located within a “Urban Unzoned” Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) in a Local Responsibility Area as indicated in the County’s mapping system in Accela. Therefore, any impacts would be less than significant. Sources of Information • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire). 2009. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA Map. • Bellecci & Associates, Inc. 2022. Loreto Bay Estates Tentative Map dated March 31, 2022. • Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005-2020. Safety Element. • Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated September 2, 2021. • Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. 2022. Staff Report and Conditions of Approval dated June 21, 2022. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 60 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? SUMMARY: a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Less than Significant) The project to subdivide the property into 15 lots and construct a single-family residence on each lot and associated improvements. The property is located in a developed area of the County and contains primarily residential land uses, while industrial uses are also located in the surrounding area. Impacts to the quality of the environment related to Aesthetic, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology/Soils, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with the adoption of the mitigation measures that are specified in the respective sections of this initial study. Thus, the measures will be conditions of approval of the proposed project and the applicant will be responsible for implementation of the measures. Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 61 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Less than Significant Impact) The proposed project to allow 15 residential lots and a residence on each lot would not create substantial cumulative impacts. The project site is located within the Urban Limit Line in an area that is surrounded primarily by single-family residential development. In addition, there will be no significant increase in the demand for public services such as water, sewage disposal, or solid waste disposal that would require new or significantly expanded infrastructure improvements that could impact the environment. The project is consistent with the Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) General Plan land use designation. Furthermore, the proposed project would be consistent with the existing single-family residential development surrounding the project site. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Less than Significant Impact) This Initial Study has disclosed impacts that would be less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures. All identified Mitigation Measures will be included in the conditions of approval for the proposed project, and the applicant will be responsible for implementation of the measures. The project would also comply with all applicable General Plan policies, County Codes, and other applicable local and state regulations. As a result, there would not be any environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. REFERENCES In the process of preparing the Initial Study Checklist and conduction of the evaluation, the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553) were consulted: 1. Project Application and Plans 2. California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 3. Contra Costa County General Plan (2005 – 2020) 4. Contra Costa County Historic Resources Inventory (12/2010) 5. Contra Costa County Important Farmland Map (2016) 6. Contra Costa County Ordinance (Title 8) 7. Contra Costa County Accela 8. County Geographic Information System (GIS) Data Layers 9. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. 10. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. Air Quality Guidelines. 11. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - “Cortese List” (Website) 12. Contra Costa County, 2015. Climate Action Plan. 13. Contra Costa County. 2008. Municipal Climate Action Plan. 14. California Department of Finance. 2021. 15. Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. June 21, 2022. Staff Report and Conditions of Approval. 16. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated March 11, 2021. 17. California Historical Resources Information System, Northwest Information Center. 2021. Agency comment letter dated September 15, 2021. 18. Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). 2021. Agency Comment Letter dated August 24, 2021. 19. Wilton Rancheria. 2022. Tribal Consultation Letter dated April 18, 2022. 20. Darwin Myers Associates, County Geologist. 2021. Geologic Peer Review for County File #CDSD21- 09588. December 10, 2021. 21. Traverso Tree. 2021. Tree Inventory for Loreto Bay, Fairview Avenue & Pullman Avenue, Bay Point dated November 23, 2021. 22. TRC. 2021. Geotechnical Investigation, Pullman Avenue and Fairview Avenue, Bay Point, CA. June 3, 2021. 23. TRC. 2021. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Loreto Bay Property, Pullman Avenue, Bay Point, CA dated March 24, 2021. 24. Public Resources Code 25. CalRecycle (Webpage) http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Government/default.htm 26. CalRecycle, Facility/Site Summary Details: Keller Canyon Landfill (07-AA-0032) (Webpage) http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/07-AA-0032/Detail/ 27. Contra Costa Library (Webpage) http://ccclib.org/ ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Project Plans 3. Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILES #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028, MONTE DAVIS FOR DISCOVERY BUILDERS INC (APPLICANT) AND JOSE AND MONICA LUIS (OWNERS) Project Approval 1. The Rezoning, Tentative Map and Final Development Plan for a 15-lot Subdivision Project is APPROVED, as generally shown and based on the following documents: • Application and materials submitted to the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) on August 19, 2021. • Revised Plans received on April 8, 2022. • Geotechnical Investigation prepared by TRC Companies, dated June 3, 2021. • Stormwater Control Plan, prepared by Bellecci & Associates dated October 2021. • Tree Inventory, prepared by Traverso Tree Service, Inc. dated November 23, 2021. Approval Contingent on Consistent Approval of Related Rezoning Application 2. This subdivision is approved contingent upon the Board of Supervisors’ approval of a rezoning request, County File #CDRZ21-03260, to rezone the subject property from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to Planned Unit District (P-1). If the rezoning application is not approved, then this approval shall be null and void. Application Fees 3. The applications submitted were subject to an initial deposit of $7,000 for rezoning, $11,000 for subdivision, and $6,500 for the final development plan. The applications are subject to time and material costs if the application review expenses exceed the initial deposit. Any additional fee due must be paid prior to an application for a grading or building permit, or 60 days of the effective date of this permit, whichever occurs first. The fees include costs through permit issuance and final file preparation. Pursuant to Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Resolution Number 2019/553, where a fee payment is over 60 days past due, the Department of Conservation and Development may seek a court judgement against the applicant and will charge Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 21 interest at a rate of ten percent (10%) from the date of judgement. The applicant may obtain current costs by contacting the project planner. A bill will be mailed to the applicant shortly after permit issuance in the event that additional fees are due. Indemnification 4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9, the applicant (including the subdivider or any agent thereof) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Agency (the County) or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, of annul, the Agency’s approval concerning this subdivision map application, which action is brought within the time period provided in Section 66499.37. The County will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense. Compliance Report 5. At least 45 days prior to recordation of the Final Map, issuance of a grading or building permit, or tree removal, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall provide a permit compliance report to the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) for review and approval. The report shall identify all conditions of approval that are administered by the CDD. The report shall document the measures taken by the applicant to satisfy all relevant conditions. Copies of the permit conditions may be obtained from the CDD. Unless otherwise indicated, the applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with the applicable conditions of this report prior to filing the Final Map. The permit compliance review is subject to staff time and materials charges, with an initial deposit of $1,500, which shall be paid at the time of submittal of the compliance report. 6. This Final Development Plan Permit includes approval of the design for the 15- residential units. Any changes to the approved plans stated above must be submitted for review and approval of CDD, and may require the submittal of an application, if deemed necessary. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 3 of 21 Project Phasing / Filing of Multiple Subdivision Maps 7. The filing of multiple Final Maps or multiple Parcel Maps must conform with Sections 66456.1 & 66463.1 of the Subdivision Map Act and is subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Division and the Public Works Department. Contra Costa County has the authority to impose reasonable conditions relating to the filing of multiple Final Maps or multiple Parcel Maps, and the conditions of approval for this subdivision permit shall apply to each subdivision phase. If multiple subdivision maps will be filed, the conditions of approval for this permit must be satisfied for each phase prior to recordation of individual maps, and a separate compliance review application will be required for each subdivision phase to determine the status of the conditions of approval for that phase. Residential Design Standards 8. The guide for development shall be the Single-Family Residential District, R-6. Lot 15 9. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for a new residence on Lot 15, the applicant shall provide an updated site plan that provides the setbacks for the review and approval of CDD. Homeowner’s Association (HOA) 10. A homeowners association shall be formed for the ownership and maintenance of all common areas, including private streets, bioretention basins (Parcels A, B, D) and common open space (Parcel C) and landscaping. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) shall be submitted for review by the CDD. This document shall provide for establishment, ownership and maintenance of private roads on and common areas, fencing, and establishment of signs. The CC&Rs shall require occupants to maintain garage spaces in a manner, which makes them available for off-street parking. The Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 4 of 21 CC&Rs shall specify that future residential development may be subject to the review and approval of CDD. Park Impact Fee 12. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for a new residence, the applicant shall pay the applicable park impact fee as established by the Board of Supervisors. Park Dedication Fee 13. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for a new residence, the applicant shall pay the applicable park dedication fee as established by the Board of Supervisors. Child Care 14. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for a new residence, the applicant shall pay a fee of $400.00 toward childcare facility needs in the area, as established by the Board of Supervisors. Police Services District 15. Election for Establishment of a Police Services District to Augment Police Services: Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the owner of the property shall participate in the provision of funding to maintain and augment police services by voting to approve a special tax for the parcels created by this subdivision approval. The tax shall be per parcel annual amount (with appropriate future CPI adjustment) established at the time of voting by the Board of Supervisors. The election to provide for the tax shall be completed prior to filing the Final Map. The property owner shall be responsible for paying the cost of holding the election, payable at the time the election is requested by the owner. Allow a minimum of three to four months for processing. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 5 of 21 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program 16. The applicant shall implement a project-specific Final Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program with the goal of encouraging residents of the development to use alternate modes of transportation. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for a new residence, the applicant shall submit a conceptual TDM program, which complies with the standards of the County TDM Ordinance. The conceptual TDM Program shall be subject to review and approval of the CDD. Signage 17. At least 30 days prior to submittal of a building permit for signage, a detailed sign program shall be submitted for the review and approval of CDD. Restitution for Tree Removal 18. Required Restitution for Approved Tree Removal: The following measures are intended to provide restitution for the removal of five code-protected trees: A. Tree Restitution Planting and Irrigation Plan: Prior to the removal of trees or CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of building permits (e.g. demolition, grading or building), whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a tree planting and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed arborist or landscape architect for the review and approval of CDD. The plan shall provide for the planting of twenty-three (23), 15-gallon trees. The plan shall comply with the County Water Efficient Landscapes Ordinance. The plan shall be accompanied by an estimate prepared by a licensed landscape architect or arborist of the materials and labor costs to complete the improvements on the plan. The plan shall be implemented prior to final building inspection of each residence. B. Required Security to Assure Completion of Plan Improvements: Prior to removal of trees or CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of building permits (e.g., demolition, grading or building), whichever occurs first, the Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 6 of 21 applicant shall submit a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit) that is acceptable to the CDD. The bond shall include the amount of the approved cost estimate, plus a 20% inflation surcharge. C. Initial Deposit for Processing of Security: The County ordinance requires that the applicant pay fees to cover all staff time and material costs of staff for processing the landscape improvement security. At the time of submittal of the security, the applicant shall pay an initial deposit of $200. D. Duration of Security: The security shall be retained by the County for a minimum of 12 months up to 24 months beyond the date of receipt of the security and from the time the final inspection for the apartment building was approved. A prerequisite of releasing the bond between 12 and 24 months shall be to have the applicant arrange for the consulting arborist to inspect the trees and to prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event that CDD determines that the tree(s) intended to be protected has been damaged, and CDD determines that the applicant has not been diligent in providing reasonable restitution, then CDD may require that all part of the security be used to provide for mitigation of the damaged tree(s). E. Integration with Final Landscape Plan: The tree restitution planting and irrigation plans described in subsection (a) above may be incorporated as part of the Final Landscape Plan required pursuant to Condition #23 below. However, the planting plan shall identify the replacement trees required to replace removed protected trees, which are intended to satisfy this condition. In addition, the provided estimate shall only cover materials and labor associated with the implementation of the required tree restitution, and not for the full landscape plan. 19. Tree removal shall occur only with an approved grading or building permit. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 7 of 21 Landscaping 20. Final Landscaping Plan: At least 30 days prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a grading permit or building permit for each residence, whichever occurs first, a final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the CDD for review and approval. The landscaping plan shall conform to the County Water Efficient Landscapes Ordinance. Prior to requesting a final inspection for each residence, the approved landscaping shall be installed and evidence of the installation (e.g., photos) shall be provided for the review and approval of CDD. Lighting 21. Proposed exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of-way to prevent glare or excessive light spillover. (MM AES-4) Air Quality 22. The following Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Basic Construction mitigation measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be stated on the face of all construction plans: A. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. B. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. C. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. D. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. E. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 8 of 21 F. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. G. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. H. The applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the developer/project manager’s name and telephone number regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. (Mitigation Measure AIR-2) Cultural Resources 23. If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face all construction plans: All construction personnel, including operators of equipment involved in grading, or trenching activities will be advised of the need to immediately stop work if they observe any indications of the presence of an unanticipated cultural resource discovery (e.g. wood, stone, foundations, and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; deposits of wood, glass, ceramics). If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and a qualified archaeologist contacted to evaluate the finds and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures in consultation with the appropriate County and other agencies. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If eligible, deposits will need to be avoided by impacts or such impacts must be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the NWIC and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. (MM CUL-1) Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 9 of 21 24. If during the course of construction activities there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken and included on the face of all construction plans: If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist shall be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. The MLD will work with the Applicant and a qualified archaeologist to determine the proper treatment of the human remains and any associated funerary objects. Construction activities will not resume until either the human remains are exhumed, or the remains are avoided via project construction design change. Upon completion of the assessment by an archaeologist, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa agencies. (MM CUL-3) Geology and Soils 25. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide an updated geotechnical report for the review and approval by the County’s Geologist and the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD). The scope of the geotechnical update report shall include logging of a minimum of at least three auger borings that are approximately 25 ft. deep, each. Provide adequate data on the engineering properties of the sand layers within the non-liquefiable cap (i.e., within approximately 20 ft. of the ground surface). If this screening investigation encountered sands that were considered to be possible Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 10 of 21 candidates for liquefaction, the liquefaction potential of this cap sands shall be performed. (MM GEO-1a) 26. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall provide evaluation liquefaction potential of sands penetrated in CPT-2. Additionally, estimate the amount of dry consolidation settlement for CPT-2. (MM GEO-1b) 27. The applicant shall provide additional design details on the mitigation of expansive soils (i.e., recommendations) addressing (a) thickness of the import fill material on building pads, (b) the project geotechnical engineer shall approve any import brought to the site, (c) the import shall not be more expansive or more corrosive than the native soils on the site, (d) specify the final grades recommended within approximately 3 ft. of the foundation to achieve compliance with the intent of the geotechnical engineers recommendation that positive drainage be provided to direct water away from the foundation, and (e) include a report from the corrosion protection engineer as an appendix to the Updated Geotechnical Report. It shall include test results; analysis of the data gathered and provide design recommendations to mitigate the hazard posed by corrosive soils. (MM GEO-2) 28. The Updated Geotechnical Report shall include a citation to the project plans and shall comment on their compliance with geotechnical recommendations and specifications. (MM GEO-3a) 29. The Updated Geotechnical Report shall comment on grading and drainage plans for the project, including the citing and design of the Stormwater C.3 basins. If they are available, provide comments on the foundation plans and associated exhibits. (MM GEO-3b) 30. The project geotechnical engineer shall provide adequate observation services to confirm that their foundation, final grading, and drainage recommendations have been implemented, as well as backfilling of utility trenches and construction of the private roads and flatwork. (MM GEO-3c) 31. The following General Notes shall be placed on Sheets that show drainage improvements and utility improvements. • The underground/ grading contractor shall provide a minimum of 24-hour notice to the entity charged with providing the monitoring services. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 11 of 21 • The entity that is providing the monitoring service shall be identified (name of firm, mailing address, phone number, and email). (MM GEO-4) Noise 32. The following noise reduction measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be included on all construction plans. A. Unless specifically approved otherwise via prior authorization from the Zoning Administrator, all construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on State and Federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the State or Federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) President’s Day (State) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Juneteenth National Independence Holiday (Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For specific details on the actual day the State and Federal holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal Holidays: Federal Holidays (opm.gov) California Holidays: http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutftb/holidays.shtml Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 12 of 21 B. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project-related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to uses on the site. This shall be communicated to all project-related contractors. C. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. D. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are imposed on construction activities, except that the hours shall be limited to weekdays between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. and prohibited on State and Federal holidays. (MM NOISE-1) 33. A pre-construction meeting shall be held to confirm that all noise mitigation measures and practices (including construction hours, neighborhood notification, posted signs, etc.) are completed prior to the start of construction. 34. The applicant shall notify neighbors within 300 feet of the subject property at least one week in advance of demolition, grading, and construction activities. Debris Recovery 35. At least 15 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, the developer shall demonstrate compliance with the Debris Recovery CalGreen program. Street Names 36. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, proposed street names shall be submitted for review by the Department of Conservation and Development, GIS/Mapping Section. Alternate street names should be submitted. The Final Map cannot be certified by CDD without the approved street names. Electric Vehicle 37. In accordance with the County’s Electric Vehicle (EV) Ordinance, the applicant is required to install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit for each residential unit. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 13 of 21 Annexation to Delta-Diablo Sanitary District 38. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide evidence that the annexation process has been initiated to annex to the Delta-Diablo Sanitary District for wastewater service. Will Serve Letters 39. Prior to the first residential building permit, the applicant shall submit a will-serve letter from Golden State Water Company. 40. Prior to the first residential building permit, the applicant shall submit a will-serve letter from Delta-Diablo Sanitary District. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 41. The project is subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Pursuant to Section 822-4.402 of the County Ordinance Code, a residential development of five or more for-sale units shall require at least fifteen percent of the for-sale units to be developed and sold as inclusionary units. The applicant is required to construct 2.25 units of inclusionary housing for the project. As an alternative to the requirement to construct inclusionary housing, the applicant has proposed the payment of an in-lieu fee. This alternative for DCD to collect an in- lieu fee, as established in DCD’s fee schedule, has been accepted. Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of a grading, building, or demolition permit for the housing development, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall pay the County the full amount of the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee. The current in-lieu fee calculation for the 15-unit for-sale housing project is $6,600.06 per unit in the housing development. However, the actual fee collected will be that which is applicable prior to issuance of a grading permit, building permit, demolition permit, or recordation of the subdivision map, whichever occurs first. This in-lieu fee is non-refundable and non-transferable. 42. Should the applicant choose not to satisfy the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance via the full payment of the in-lieu fee prior to the recordation of the Final Map or the issuance of a grading, building, or demolition permit, whichever occurs first, the Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 14 of 21 applicant shall comply with the County Ordinance Code Chapter 822-4 and construct the required number of inclusionary units on-site, off-site, or a combination of both on-site and off-site. PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISION CDSD21-09588 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Title 8, Title 9 and Title 10 of the Ordinance Code. Any exceptions must be stipulated in these Conditions of Approval. Conditions of Approval are based on the tentative map submitted to the Department of Conservation and Development on October 26, 2021. COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO FILING OF THE FINAL MAP. General Requirements: 43. In accordance with Section 92-2.006 of the Ordinance Code, this subdivision shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9). Any exceptions therefrom must be specifically listed in this conditional approval statement. The drainage, road and utility improvements outlined below shall require the review and approval of the Public Works Department and are based on the tentative map received by the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division, on October 26, 2021. 44. Improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, along with review and inspection fees, and security for all improvements required by the Ordinance Code for the conditions of approval of this subdivision. Any necessary traffic signing, and striping shall be included in the improvement plans for review by the Transportation Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Roadway Improvements (Pullman Avenue): 45. The applicant shall construct curb, 5-foot sidewalk, necessary longitudinal and transverse drainage, street lighting, and pavement widening and transitions along the frontage of Pullman Avenue. The applicant shall construct face of curb 16 feet from the road centerline Many of these improvements have already been installed but may need to be modified to accommodate the proposed onsite improvements. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 15 of 21 46. Any cracked and displaced curb, gutter, and sidewalk shall be removed and replaced along the project frontage of Pullman Avenue. Concrete shall be saw cut prior to removal. Existing lines and grade shall be maintained. New curb and gutter shall be doweled into existing improvements. 47. The applicant shall construct a street type connection with 20-foot radii curb returns in lieu of standard driveway depressions at the intersection of the private roads with Pullman Avenue. Access to Adjoining Property: Proof of Access 48. The applicant shall furnish proof to the Public Works Department of the acquisition of all necessary rights of way, rights of entry, permits and/or easements for the construction of off-site, temporary, or permanent, public and private road and drainage improvements. Encroachment Permit 49. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department for construction of driveways or other improvements within the right- of-way of Pullman Avenue. Abutter’s Rights 50. The applicant shall relinquish abutter’s rights of access along Pullman Avenue except for the proposed private road intersections and driveways serving lots 14 and 15. Road Alignment/Intersection Design/Sight Distance: 51. The applicant shall provide sight distance at the on-site driveways and Pullman Avenue for a design speed of 35 miles per hour. The applicant shall trim vegetation, as necessary, to provide sight distance at these driveways. Any new landscaping, signs, fencing, retaining walls, or other obstructions proposed at the driveways shall be setback to ensure that the sight lines are clear. Private Roads: 52. The applicant shall construct the on-site roadways and the internal road network (serving the residential development) to current County private road standards, subject to the review of the Fire District. Streets shall be a minimum of 20 feet in Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 16 of 21 width with a 5-foot sidewalk (width measured from curb face) along at least one contiguous side of the street. Although the proposed on-site roadways are to remain private, the pavement structural section shall conform to County public road standards. Street Light Financing: 53. The Property owner(s) shall annex to the Community Facilities District (CFD) 2010-1 formed for Countywide Street Light Financing. Annexation into a street light service area does not include the transfer of ownership and maintenance of street lighting on private roads. Pedestrian Facilities: Pedestrian Access 54. Curb ramps and driveways shall be designed and constructed in accordance with current County standards. A detectable warning surface (e.g., truncated domes) shall be installed on all curb ramps. Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated at the curb returns to accommodate the returns and curb ramps; accommodate a minimum 4- foot landing on top of any curb ramp proposed. 55. The applicant shall design all public and private pedestrian facilities in accordance with Title 24 (Handicap Access) and the Americans with Disabilities Act. This shall include all sidewalks, paths, driveway depressions, and curb ramps. Parking: 56. Parking shall be prohibited on one side of on-site roadways where the curb-to-curb width is less than 36 feet and on both sides of on-site roadways where the curb-to- curb width is less than 28 feet. “No Parking” signs shall be installed along these portions of the roads subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. Maintenance of Facilities: 57. The maintenance obligation of all common and open space areas, private roadways, any private streetlights, public and private landscaped areas, perimeter walls/fences, and on-site drainage facilities shall be included in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs). The language shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 17 of 21 Division and Public Works Department at least 60 days prior to filing of the Final Map for the first phase. Drainage Improvements: Collect and Convey 58. The applicant shall collect and convey all stormwater entering and/or originating on this property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the stormwater to an adequate natural watercourse, in accordance with Division 914 of the Ordinance Code. 59. The nearest public drainage facility is DA 48D Line B located northeast of the site. Applicant shall verify its adequacy prior to discharging run-off. Miscellaneous Drainage Requirements: 60. The applicant shall design and construct all storm drainage facilities in compliance with the Ordinance Code and Public Works Department design standards. 61. The applicant shall prevent storm drainage from draining across the sidewalk(s) and driveway(s) in a concentrated manner. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): 62. The applicant shall be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and procedures of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal, construction and industrial activities as promulgated by the California State Water Resources Control Board, or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (San Francisco Bay - Region II). Compliance shall include developing long-term best management practices (BMPs) for the reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants. The project design shall incorporate wherever feasible, the following long-term BMPs in accordance with the Contra Costa Clean Water Program for the site's stormwater drainage: - Minimize the amount of directly connected impervious surface area. - Install approved full trash capture devices on all catch basins (excluding catch basins within bioretention area) as reviewed and approved by Public Works Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 18 of 21 Department. Trash capture devices shall meet the requirements of the County’s NPDES permit. - Place advisory warnings on all catch basins and storm drains using current storm drain markers. - Shallow roadside and on-site swales. - Construct concrete driveway weakened plane joints at angles to assist in directing run-off to landscaped/pervious areas prior to entering the street curb and gutter. - Distribute public information items regarding the Clean Water Program and lot specific IMPs to buyers. - Other alternatives comparable to the above as approved by Public Works. Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance: 63. The applicant shall submit a final Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) and a Stormwater Control Operation and Maintenance Plan (O+M Plan) to the Public Works Department, which shall be reviewed for compliance with the County’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and shall be deemed consistent with the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) prior to filing of the Final Map. All time and materials costs for review and preparation of the SWCP and the O+M Plan shall be borne by the applicant. 64. Improvement plans shall be reviewed to verify consistency with the final SWCP and compliance with Provision C.3 of the County’s NPDES Permit and the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014). 65. Stormwater management facilities shall be subject to inspection by the Public Works Department; all time and materials costs for inspection of stormwater management facilities shall be borne by the applicant. 66. Prior to filing of the Final Map, the property owner(s) shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Operation and Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County, in which the property owner(s) shall accept responsibility for and related to the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities, and grant access to relevant public agencies for inspection of stormwater management facilities. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 19 of 21 67. Prior to filing of the Final Map, the property owner(s) shall annex the subject property into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2007-1 (Stormwater Management Facilities), which funds responsibilities of Contra Costa County under its NPDES Permit to oversee the ongoing operation and maintenance of stormwater facilities by property owners. 68. Any proposed water quality features that are designed to retain water for longer than 72 hours shall be subject to the review of the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District. Drainage Area Fee Ordinance: 69. The applicant shall comply with the drainage fee requirements for Drainage Area 48B as adopted by the Board of Supervisors prior to initiation of the use requested with this application. This fee shall be paid prior to filing of the Final Map. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 20 of 21 ADVISORY NOTES ADVISORY NOTES ARE ATTACHED TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BUT ARE NOT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. ADVISORY NOTES ARE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO INFORM THE APPLICANT OF ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, AND REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. A. NOTICE OF 90-DAY OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. This notice is intended to advise the applicant that pursuant to Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the applicant has the opportunity to protest fees, dedications, reservations, and/or exactions required as part of this project approval. The opportunity to protest is limited to a 90-day period after the project is approved. The ninety (90) day period, in which you may protest the amount of any fee or the imposition of any dedication, reservation, or other exaction required by this approved permit, begins on the date this permit was approved. To be valid, a protest must be in writing pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 and delivered to the Department of Conservation and Development within 90 days of the approval date of this permit. B. The Applicant is subject to the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the East Contra Costa Regional Fee & Finance Authority/ Regional Transportation Development Impact Mitigation (ECCRFFA/RTDIM) and Bay Point Areas of Benefit Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors prior to issuance of building permits. C. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Department of Fish and Wildlife. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife of any proposed construction within this development that may affect any fish and wildlife resources, per the Fish and Wildlife Code. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 21 of 21 D. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the appropriate district of the Corps of Engineers to determine if a permit is required, and if it can be obtained. E. Although the Stormwater Control Plan has been determined to be preliminarily complete, it remains subject to future revision, as necessary, during preparation of improvement plans to bring it into full compliance with C.3 stormwater requirements. Failure to update the SWCP to match any revisions made in the improvement plans may result in a substantial change to the County approval, and the project may be subject to additional public hearings. Revisions to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents may also be required. This may significantly increase the time and applicant’s costs associated with approval of the application. F. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the following agencies: - Department of Conservation and Development, Building Inspection Division - Contra Costa County Fire Protection District - Delta Diablo Sanitary District - Golden State Water - Contra Costa Water District PROJECT FINDINGS FOR COUNTY FILES #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21- 03028, MONTE DAVIS FOR DISCOVERY BUILDERS INC (APPLICANT) AND JOSE AND MONICA LUIS (OWNERS) A. Government Code Section 65863(b) (No Net Loss) Section 65863(b)(1) No city, county, or city and county shall, by administrative, quasi- judicial, legislative, or other action, reduce, or require or permit the reduction of, the residential density for any parcel to, or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (g), unless the city, county, or city and county makes written findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the following: (A) The reduction is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. Project Finding: The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential-High Density. The project is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential- High Density (SH), which allows 5.0 – 7.2 units per net acre. The proposed project would subdivide the property into 15 residential lots on a net acre of 2.41 or a density of 6.0 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the density allowed by the general plan. Thus, there is no reduction in the residential density allowed by the SH General Plan land use designation. (B) The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level. Project Finding: The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) was prepared by ABAG for the period of January 1, 2014 through October 31, 2022. As part of this process, ABAG requires each jurisdiction to plan for a certain number of housing units for this period. This requirement is satisfied by identifying adequate sites that could accommodate housing that is affordable to very low, low, moderate, and above moderate-income households. ABAG has determined that the unincorporated County’s share of regional housing needs is a total of 1,367 new housing units, which includes the construction of 243 moderate- Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 2 of 12 income housing units. Based on the 2021 Annual Element Progress Report, the County has constructed an aggregate of 2,408 units across all income levels with 78 moderate-income units remaining to be constructed for the County’s share of the 5th Cycle of the Housing Element RHNA. The project would allow 15 single-family residential lots on the subject property which has been identified on the County’s sites inventory for providing 14- moderate income units. Although the project does not provide moderate units, there are other parcels listed in the County’s sites inventory where there remains a potential for the construction of moderate-income units (https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/33352/2014-Land- Inventory---Vacant-and-Underutilized-Sites-Analysis?bidId=). There are several properties identified in the housing inventory that are vacant and designated for moderate-income units, including at least two other parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 403-030-005 and 032-112-007) with a capacity of 301 moderate units that have not been developed. These sites Therefore, there is capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate moderate-income units. Section 65863(b)(2) If a city, county, or city and county, by administrative, quasi- judicial, legislative, or other action, allows development of any parcel with fewer units by income category than identified in the jurisdiction’s housing element for that parcel, the city, county, or city and county shall make a written finding supported by substantial evidence as to whether or not remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level. Project Finding: The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) was prepared by ABAG for the period of January 1, 2014 through October 31, 2022. As part of this process, ABAG requires each jurisdiction to plan for a certain number of housing units for this period. This requirement is satisfied by identifying adequate sites that could accommodate housing that is affordable to very low, low, moderate, and above moderate-income households. ABAG has determined that the unincorporated Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 3 of 12 County’s share of regional housing needs is a total of 1,367 new housing units, which includes the construction of 243 moderate-income housing units. Based on the 2021 Annual Element Progress Report, the County has constructed an aggregate of 2,408 units across all income levels with 78 moderate-income units remaining to be constructed for the County’s share of the 5th Cycle of the Housing Element RHNA. The project would allow 15 single-family residential lots on the subject property which has been identified on the County’s sites inventory for providing 14-moderate income units. Although the project does not provide moderate units, there are other parcels listed in the County’s sites inventory where there remains a potential for the construction of moderate-income units (https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/33352/2014-Land- Inventory---Vacant-and-Underutilized-Sites-Analysis?bidId=). There are several properties identified in the housing inventory that are vacant and designated for moderate-income units, including at least two other parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 403-030-005 and 032-112-007) with a capacity of 301 moderate units that have not been developed. These sites Therefore, there is capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate moderate-income units. B. General Plan Growth Management Element Findings 1. Traffic: Implementation Measure 4-c under the Growth Management Program (GMP) of the County’s General Plan requires a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more AM or PM peak-hour trips. The project consists of a subdividing an approximately 2.88-acre property in to 15 residential parcels. The project is expected to generate 11 AM and 15 PM peak hour trips. Therefore, a traffic study was not prepared. The project site is located north of Pullman Avenue, a County maintained road. Pullman Avenue is approximately 32 feet paved within a 52-foot-right-of-way. No additional dedication of right-of-way along or further widen the pavement along Pullman Avenue will be required. However, installation of concrete curb ramps, curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk (width measured from face of curb), longitudinal and transverse drainage, and street lighting, as necessary, along the project frontage will be required. Many of these improvements have Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 4 of 12 already been installed but may need to be modified to accommodate the proposed onsite improvements. The subdivision will gain access via two private roads off Pullman Avenue. Street “B” is located north of the intersections of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue and Street “A” is located north of the intersection of Gibson Avenue and Pullman Avenue. Both roads will have a paved width of 20 feet with right of way width varying from 25 feet to 30 feet. Both streets end in a hammerhead turnaround near the northern property line. Overall, the project would not cause unacceptable traffic related impacts in the immediate vicinity or area. 2. Water: The GMP requires new development to demonstrate that adequate water quantity can be provided. The project site currently receives water service from the Golden State Water Company (GSWC). The project was forwarded to the GSWC who did not provide any comments. The project should be submitted to GSWC for their review and approval. Furthermore, there has been no indication from GSWC that the project would exceed the capacity of their existing public water infrastructure. 3. Sanitary Sewer: The GMP requires that new development demonstrate that adequate sanitary sewer service is available. The project site is not currently served by Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) and would need to be annexed into the district. The applicant has initiated the process to annex the project site into the district for the 15 lots. Prior to the submittal of building permits, DDSD will review the submittal for conformance with their development standards and will require any potential upgrades at that time. By meeting the development standards of DDSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by existing DDSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system. 4. Fire Protection: Fire protection and emergency medical response services for the project vicinity are provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Fire protection to the project site would be provided by Station No. 86, which is located approximately 0.62 miles southwest from the site. The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of the California Fire Code, the California Building Code, and applicable Contra Costa County Ordinances that pertain to emergency access, fire suppression systems, and fire detection/warning systems. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the construction drawings would be Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 5 of 12 reviewed and approved by the fire district. All homes will be equipped with an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system. The project site’s close proximity to an existing fire station combined with the requirement for compliance with applicable building and fire codes ensures that the project will not result in an undue fire risk at the site; therefore, there is no need for expanded fire protection services. 5. Public Protection: The County General Plan Policy 7-57 indicates a Sheriff facility standard of 155 square feet of Sheriff station space per 1,000 persons of population. The project would increase the population of unincorporated Contra Costa County by approximately 43 persons, which is less than the facility standard and is a non-substantial increase. The addition of 15 single-family residences to the project area would not significantly affect the provision of police services to the area. Furthermore, the Condition of Approval (COA) #15 requires the formation of a police services district to provide funding to maintain and augment police services. 6. Parks and Recreation: As the project will add to the County’s population, COA #12 and 13 requires the project proponent to pay applicable Park fees per unit. The Park Impact fee collected will be used for acquisition of parkland and development of parks and recreational facilities. The Park Dedication requirement allows the developer of land for residential use to dedicate land, pay an in-lieu fee, or a combination of both for neighborhood and community park or recreational purposes. Additionally, the project includes a common open space area to be used as a park by the residents of the 15 lots. The open space area is approximately 3,544 square feet and is identified as Parcel C. Thus, the combination of the common open space area and the per-unit in-lieu fees provided by the applicant will ensure that the project does not adversely impact the County’s ability to maintain the standard of having three acres of neighborhood parks for every 1,000 members of the population. 7. Flood Control and Drainage: The project is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency-designated Special Flood Hazard (100-year) Zone, and thus flooding at the site is not a potential hazard. The site generally slopes towards the north. A 30-inch storm drain is located along the northern property line, which discharges into the Delta. The project site Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 6 of 12 was originally zoned for industrial uses and storm drain was sized accordingly. The project proposes a less dense use; therefore, the receiving system is adequate to handle runoff from the development. C. Rezoning Findings (County Code Section 26-2.1806) 1. Required Finding: The change proposed will substantially comply with the general plan. Project Finding: The project site is located within a Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) General Plan land use designation. Primary land uses in the SH land use designation include detached single-family homes and accessory buildings and structures. The project is a use that is consistent with the SH land use designation. The project site is located within the Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X), which is not consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. The project includes a rezoning of the 2.88- acre site to a Planned Unit District (P-1). Table 3-5 of the County’s General Plan indicates that a P-1 zoning district is consistent with the SH land use designation. The project is an infill project that is consistent with other General Plan policies that promotes housing opportunities and encourages other modes of transportation (e.g., transit, bicycling), while providing additional units to the County’s housing inventory. Thus, the rezoning of an approximately 2.88-acre project site will substantially comply with the County’s General Plan. 2. Required Finding: The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within the district and to uses authorized in adjacent district. Project Finding: The project site is surrounded by a number of single-family residential developments directly south and west of the property. The project is a use consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. Overall, the project is in harmony with the surrounding area and the uses established in the area. 3. Required Finding: Community need has been demonstrated for the use proposed, but this does not require demonstration of future financial success. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 7 of 12 Project Finding: The approximately 2.88-acre project site is a vacant parcel. The project is an infill project that is located within an area that is developed with primarily with residential uses. The project to subdivide the property into 15 lots and construct the 15 residential units will improve the current vacant use of the project site. Further, the 2005-2020 Contra Costa County General Plan contains policies related to providing an adequate supply of housing and encouraging infill development on under-utilized sites within urbanized areas where necessary utilities already are installed. This project is consistent with the surrounding area consisting of residential development near transit. The project site is located approximately one mile north of the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station, which is served by the Tri Delta Transit. A bus stop is approximately 0.20 miles south of the subject property, approximately 138 west from the corner of Fairview Avenue and Willow Pass Road. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. D. Tentative Map Findings (County Code Section 94-2.806) 1. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall not approve a tentative map unless it finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the applicable general plan required by law. Project Finding: The project is located within the Bay Point area of the County, where the surrounding uses include primarily of residential developments. The tentative map would subdivide the approximately 2.88-acre project site into 15 residential lots to construct 15 residences. The project is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential- High Density (SH), which allows 5.0 – 7.2 units per net acre. The proposed project would subdivide the property into 15 residential lots on a net acre of 2.41 or a density of 6.0 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the density allowed by the general plan. Overall, the project is consistent with the applicable policies for the SH land use designation, as well as transportation and housing policies of the General Plan. 2. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall not approve a tentative map unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision fulfills construction requirements. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 8 of 12 Project Finding: The project will comply with the collect and convey regulations, storm drainage facilities, and design standards for private roads. Additionally, compliance with the California Building Code and all applicable County Ordinances is required for grading of the property and construction of residential buildings. E. Findings of Approval of P-1 Zoning District and Final Development Plan (County Code Section (84-66.1406) 1. Required Finding: The applicant intends to start construction within two and one- half years from the effective date of the zoning change and plan approval. Project Finding: The applicant has indicated that they intend to commence construction within 2 ½ years off the effective date of the zoning change and plan approval. 2. Required Finding: The proposed planned unit development is consistent with the County General Plan. Project Finding: The project site is located within a Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH) General Plan land use designation. Primary land uses in the SH land use designation include detached single-family homes and accessory buildings and structures. The project to allow a 15-lot subdivision and to construct 15 residences is a use that is consistent with the SH land use designation. The project requires a rezone of the project site to a Planned Unit District (P-1) to allow a 15-lot subdivision. Table 3-5 of the County’s General Plan indicates that a P-1 zoning district is consistent with the SH land use designation. The project is an infill project that is consistent with other General Plan policies that promotes housing opportunities and encourages other modes of transportation (e.g., transit, bicycling), while providing additional units to the County’s housing inventory. Thus, the rezoning of an approximately 2.88-acre project site will substantially comply with the County’s General Plan. The County’s General Plan provides Housing goals and policies that promote and encourage projects, such as this project within the Bay Point area. Goal 6 of the County’s Housing Element identifies the need to provide adequate sites with the Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 9 of 12 appropriate land use and zoning designations to accommodate the County’s share of regional housing. The project site is a vacant and surrounded primarily of residential development. The project would provide 15 residential lots, with a residence on each lot. The project includes the rezoning of the property to P-1, which is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of SH. Policy 3-8 of the General Plan encourages infilling of already developed areas, where new development is preferred to vacant or under-used sites within urbanized areas, which have necessary utilities installed. The County’s General Plan also provides Transportation goals and policies that supports the project. The project is a transit-oriented, infill development project that provides the much-needed housing units approximately on mile from the Pittsburg/Bay Point Area BART Station, which is served by the Tri Delta Transit. A bus stop is located approximately 0.20 miles south of the project site, approximately 138 feet west from the corner of Fairview Avenue and Willow Pass Road. Overall, the project is consistent with the County’s General Plan, especially the goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by providing housing within an area that provides multimodal access. 3. Required Finding: In the case of residential development, it will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and community. Project Finding: The surrounding area consists primarily of residential uses. The 15-lots will consist of a residence on each lot. The residences will consist of four to five bedrooms, ranging in size from 1,829 – 2,559 square feet of living area, within a one or two-story building. The project site is located within an established neighborhood that consisting primarily of single-family developments. The project site is located within an area that is accessible to different modes of transportation (e.g. bicycle, transit, etc.). Overall, the proposed development will be in harmony with the surrounding area. 4. Required Finding: The development of a harmonious integrated plan justifies exceptions from the normal application of this code. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 10 of 12 Project Finding: The project site is approximately 2.88 acres in size that is currently zoned Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X). The SH General Plan land use designation permits detached single- family homes and accessory buildings and structures, consistent with the project to establish 15 single-family residences. Since the project site’s current zoning designation is not consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation, the project includes a rezoning of the project site to a P-1, which is consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. Overall, the project will remain for residential use consistent with surrounding area. F. Variance Findings (County Code Section 26-2.2006) Variance request from the five-acre minimum lot size requirement of the Planned Unit District (P-1) to allow the rezoning of the subject 2.88-acre property (Section 84- 66.602 [1]) 1. Required Finding: That any variance authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and the respective land use district in which the subject property is located. Project Finding: The project requires a variance to allow the rezoning of an approximately 2.88-acre project site from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to a Planned Unit District (P-1). Under the P-1 Zoning District, a minimum of five acres is required. As found on Table 3- 5 of the County’s Land Use Element, the P-1 zoning is consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. Additionally, Table 6-39 of the County’s Housing Element identifies the removal of the five-acre minimum lot requirement for the P-1 zoning. This would allow the development of small infill and under-utilized properties. Other properties in the County that are less than the required five acres have been rezoned to P-1. In 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning to P-1 of a 2.37-acre parcel located on Del Hombre Lane and a 0.96-acre property located on Olympic Blvd., both projects in the unincorporated area of Walnut Creek. Thus, approval of Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 11 of 12 the variance to rezone a property less than the five acres required would not be a grant of special privilege. 2. Required Finding: That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property because of its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the respective zoning regulations is found to deprive the subject property of rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and within the identical land use district. Project Finding: The proposal to rezone the project site to P-1 on an approximately 2.88-acre property would allow a 15-lot subdivision and the construction of 15 residences on an under-utilized project site. The project is compatible with the surrounding development in the area consisting of single- family residential development. Properties less than five acres have been rezoned to P-1 since 1978. More recently, the Board of Supervisors in 2020 approved the rezoning to P-1 of a 2.37-acre parcel located on Del Hombre Lane and a 0.96- acre property located on Olympic Blvd., both projects in the unincorporated area of Walnut Creek. to P-1. The County’s Housing Element identifies the removal of the minimum five-acre requirement to encourage development of infill properties. Thus, implementing the current zoning standards would deprive the subject property of rights enjoyed by other properties developed as single-family development. 3. Required Finding: That any variance authorized shall substantially meet the intent and purpose of the respective land use district in which the subject property is located. Project Finding: The proposal to rezone a property for residential use less than five acres will meet the intent of the P-1 Zoning District and the goal of the County’s Housing Element to encourage small infill properties. The P-1 Zoning District provides an opportunity for a cohesive design with flexible regulations for the purpose of providing housing. Furthermore, the project will add to the County’s housing inventory. Loreto Bay Estates 15-Lot Subdivision County Files: #CDRZ21-03260, CDSD21-09588, CDDP21-03028 BOS, February 7, 2023 Page 12 of 12 G. Tree Permit Findings (County Code Section 816-6.8010) Required Finding: The County Planning Commission is satisfied that the following factors as provided by County Code Section 816-6.8010 for granting a tree permit have been satisfied: 1. Reasonable development of the property will require the removal of five trees, all consisting of Ailanthus Altissima trees, commonly known as Tree of Heaven will be necessary to construct the project. All feasible efforts have been made to retain these trees; however, these trees are a noxiously weedy species. The branches are weak and prone to breakage, and the roots tend to resprout vigorously in response to damage. 2. Development of this project cannot be reasonably accommodated on other parts of the property due to the size of the project site. Approximately three trees are located at the southwest corner of the property, where a residence on Lot 1 will be located. The other two trees will be located approximately within proposed Street “A “and/or within Parcel B that consists of bioretention basin #2. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on the Loreto Bay Estates Project, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2. FIND that the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the Project adequately analyzes the Project’s environmental impacts, that there is no substantial evidence the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the mitigated negative declaration reflects the County’s independent judgment and analysis. 3. ADOPT the mitigated negative declaration for the Project. 4. ADOPT the mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the Project. 5. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2023-05, rezoning the subject property from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to Planned Unit District (P-1) (County File #CDRZ21-03260). 6. APPROVE a variance from the five-acre minimum lot size required of the Planned Unit District to allow the rezoning of the subject 2.88-acre property. 7. APPROVE the preliminary and final development plan for the Project, including the associated tree removal program (County File #CDDP21-03028). 8. APPROVE the findings in support of the Project. 9. APPROVE the Project conditions of approval. 10. APPROVE the Loreto Bay Estates Project. 11. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Planning Commission approved the tentative map for the Project, and that no appeal of this approval was filed. 12. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. 13. SPECIFY that the Department of Conservation and Development, located at 30 Muir Street, Martinez, California, is the custodian of the documents and other material that constitutes the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Board of Supervisors is based. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the necessary application deposits and is obligated to pay supplemental fees to cover all additional costs associated with the application process. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Loreto Bay Estates Project in the Bay Point area of the County (District V) BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant seeks approval of a rezoning of the subject property from Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I), Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X) to a Planned Unit District (P-1), a tentative map to subdivide the approximately 2.88-acre project site into 15 residential lots and four common area parcels for bioretention basins and a park, and a preliminary and final development plan to allow the construction of 15 residences and associated improvements. The residential lots will range in size from approximately 3,821 – 6,114 square feet. The common area parcels for the bioretention basins (Parcels A, B, D) range in size from approximately 6,611 – 10,263 square feet. The proposed park will be located on Parcel C and will be approximately 3,590 square feet. The proposed residences will range in size from approximately 1,829 – 2,559 square feet of living area. There will be approximately five code-protected trees removed, all Ailanthus Altissima trees. A request for a variance to allow the rezoning of the 2.88-acre property to a P-1 (where 5 acres is the minimum) is included in the project. There will be approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill that will be balanced on-site. The subject property is not located within the Delta Diablo service boundary or any other sanitary district. Therefore, the project will require annexation into the Delta Diablo service area and approval from the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). SITE/AREA DESCRIPTION Surrounding Land Uses: The subject property is located in the Bay Point area of the County. The surrounding area immediately to the south and west primarily consists of single-family residential uses. However, further west and south of the subject property includes multiple-family residential uses. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) line borders the entire length of the northern property line and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway exist further to the north of the site, running east and west. The land further to the north is designated as open space and is adjacent to the Sacramento/San Joaquin River. The land immediately to the east is currently vacant with residential uses within the City of Pittsburg further to the east. Highway 4 is approximately 0.75 miles south of the property. Site Description: The approximately 2.88-acre triangular shaped vacant site is located at the corner of Fairview Avenue and Pullman Avenue in the Bay Point area of the County. Pullman Avenue is located to the south of the project site and Fairview Avenue is located to the west of the project site. The project site is relatively flat and located within the Urban Limit Line. The site has approximately five multi-stemmed Ailanthus Altissima trees, commonly known as Tree of Heaven. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff conducted an Initial Study (IS) assessment of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that could result from the proposed Loreto Bay Estates 15-lot subdivision project. Staff determined that although the proposed project could have some environmental impacts, these impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level with mitigations incorporated. Thus, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and published for the proposed project. The public review period for the MND started on July 29, 2022 and ended on August 18, 2022. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY General Plan The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Single-Family Residential-High Density (SH), which allows 5.0 – 7.2 units per net acre. The proposed project would subdivide the property into 15 residential lots on a net acre of 2.41 or a density of 6.0 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the density allowed by the SH general plan designation. Primary land uses permitted in the SH designation include detached single-family homes and accessory buildings and structures. The project is located within the Bay Point area of the county, where the surrounding uses are primarily of residential developments and some commercial uses. According to Table 3-5 of the County’s Land Use Element of the General Plan, SH is consistent with the P-1 Zoning District. The project site is located within the Urban Limit Line (ULL) and is designated for future urban uses. The project is an infill development, since it is surrounded primarily by other residential development and the project site has the necessary utility connections. The project is consistent with the Housing Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the County's General Plan. The project site is a vacant property that would be rezoned to a P-1 to develop the site to allow 15 residences on 15 lots. The applicant will pay the in-lieu fee to comply with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. The project is consistent with the Transportation Goals and Polices of the Transportation Element of the County's General Plan. The project encourages the use of transit, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and encourages use of alternative forms of transportation. The project site is located approximately one mile north of the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station and is served by the Tri Delta Transit. A bus line runs along Willow Pass Road with a bus stop located approximately 138 feet west from the corner of Fairview Avenue and Willow Pass Road. This bus stop is approximately 0.20 miles south of the subject property. The project is also located in an area where future residents can access food and clothing, education, employment, and recreational activities. Willow Pass Road is located approximately 0.20 miles south of the subject property, where there are restaurants, drug stores, a park, and grocery stores. The applicant will be required to install concrete curb ramps, curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk and street lighting, as necessary, along the project frontage. Many of these improvements have already been installed but may need to be modified to accommodate the proposed onsite improvements. Zoning The project site is located within the Heavy Industrial Zoning District (H-I) and the Railroad Corridor Combining District (-X), which is not consistent with the SH General Plan land use designation. The project includes a rezoning of the 2.88-acre site to a Planned Unit District (P-1), which includes a preliminary and final development plan to allow construction of the 15 residences and associated improvements. The P-1 zoning district is consistent with SH and the P-1 zoning district allows flexibility with respect to use, building types, lot size, and open space, while ensuring the project complies with the County’s General Plan and requirements of the County’s Ordinance. The project is a single-family residential infill development, which will be in harmony with the single-family residential developments that primarily abut and surround the proposed project. An industrial use is located adjacent to the northwestern corner of the subject property. However, access roads, a bioretention basin and a small open space area with turf and a bench are proposed to be located in the northwestern corner between the nearest proposed homes and the industrial use. Other bioretention basins are proposed along the northwestern boundary of the project buffering the proposed homes from the adjacent railroad tracks (the two immediately adjacent railroad lines are a private spur line serving Criterion Catalyst and the defunct, no longer in use tracks that used to serve the Sacramento Northern Railway; the Union Pacific and BNSF lines are located more than 400 feet away from the closest point on the property). Overall, the project is consistent with the established neighborhood and will provide additional housing stock to the area. Since the proposed project involves a rezone to a P-1 District, the design standards are evaluated for the proposed project. There are four floor plans for the project. Plans 1-3 will have a 10-foot front yard setback from the porch, 15 feet from the residence, and 18 feet from the garage. Plan 4 will have a 5-foot front yard setback from the porch, 9 feet 9 inches from the residence, and 7 feet 11 inches from the garage. Plans 1-3 will have a minimum side yard of 5 feet with a minimum aggregate of 15 feet and will have a minimum rear yard of 20 feet. Plan 4 will have a minimum side yard of 3 feet and the aggregate side yard will be approximately 8 feet. Plan 4 is designated for lot 15 and due to the triangular shape of the lot, there will be no rear yard setback. The residences will be one to two-story residences, range in size from 1,829 to 2,559 square feet, consist of 4 to 5 bedrooms and a two-car garage. The proposed residential development is a traditional style consisting of stucco siding, and board and batten siding. The building includes gable roofing, consisting of composite roofing materials. Architectural features also include wood shutters and stucco trim. Properties in the area consist of one and two-story residences, where some residences are similar in architectural design as the proposed residences. COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The project was scheduled before the County Planning Commission (CPC) on December 14, 2022. A comment letter was received in support of the project and written comments were also received that expressed concerns of the negative effects of the rezoning on the adjacent property that contains an industrial use. The CPC voted to approve (7-0) the tentative map (County File #CDSD21-09588), and recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the remaining components of the project. CONCLUSION The proposed project is consistent with applicable goals and policies of the General Plan, and also with the intent of the SH General Plan designation and the P-1 Zoning district. The project is an underutilized site, and the project will be consistent with the uses nearby. The design and use of the project site for single-family residences is consistent with the other uses in the immediate area. Moreover, the project provides additional housing. All environmental impacts would be mitigated to a less-than-significant levels. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed rezoning and preliminary and final development plan, based on the attached findings and conditions of approval. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In the event that the proposed project is not approved, the applicant will not obtain approval of the required Rezoning, and Development Plan entitlements needed to allow development of the proposed 15-lot subdivision project in the Bay Point area. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The project involves a 15-lot subdivision to construct 15 single-family residences. Pursuant to Condition of Approval #14, the applicant shall pay the required fee established by the Board of Supervisors per unit for childcare facility needs in the area. Therefore, the recommendation supports one or more of the following children's outcomes: (1) Children Ready for and Succeeding in School; (2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; (3) Families that are Economically Self Sufficient; (4) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and (5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Project Findings Conditions of Approval Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Ordinance No. 2023-05 Maps Project Plans Power Point Presentation MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Ordinance No. 2023-05 Correspondence Received CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: January 4, 2022 TO: Clerk of the Board FROM: Department of Conservation & Development By: Andrew Gomer, Building Inspector I RE: Itemized Report of Abatement Costs The following is an itemized report of the costs of abatement for the below described property pursuant to C.C.C. Ord. Code ' 14- 6.428. OWNER: Elizabeth B. Smith POSSESSOR: N/A MORTGAGE HOLDER: N/A ABATEMENT ORDERED DATE: January 13, 2022 ABATEMENT COMPLETED DATE: March 10, 2022 SITE ADDRESS: 549 Grove Ave., Richmond, CA APN#:409-141-012 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Residential AMOUNT OF ABATEMENT COSTS (CCC ORDINANCE CODE 14-6.428) ITEM EXPLANATION COST Notice to Comply (include first 2 inspections) $ 300.00 Site Visits (5 x $150 @) $ 750.00 Recording Fee $ 17.00 PIRT (Title Search) $ 150.00 Certified Letter & Regular Mailings $ 38.00 Photos $ 10.00 Contractor hired for abatement $ 2,750.00 Final Site Inspection to Confirm Compliance $ 200.00 Compliance Report and Board Hearing $ 200.00 Total $ 4,415.00 Abatement costs can be paid at or mailed to Department of Conservation and Development, Building Inspection Division, 30 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553. 549 Grove Ave. Richmond, Ca 94801 Before Photos Go to: •“Insert” on menu bar. Select “picture”. •Go to the “Pictures (N:)” drive in the network directory. •Select the CODE ENF folder. •Select the folder by parcel number/APN •Use search bar in the top of the window to type in the parcel number •In the folder full of pictures, select the photo to be used •Drag and drop, or double-click the picture •It will appear on this screen •Stretch the picture using the little hollow points on the corners, if necessary. 549 Grove Ave. Richmond, CA 94801 After Photos RECOMMENDATION(S): OPEN the hearing on the costs of abating a public nuisance on the real property located at 549 Grove Ave., Richmond, in unincorporated Contra Costa County, California. (APN 409-141-012.); RECEIVE and CONSIDER the attached itemized report on the abatement costs and any objections thereto from the property owner or other persons with a legal interest in the property; and CLOSE the hearing. DETERMINE the cost of all abatement work and all administrative costs to be $4,415.00. ORDER the itemized report confirmed and DIRECT that it be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. ORDER the costs to be specially assessed against the above-referenced property and AUTHORIZE the recordation of a Notice Of Abatement Lien. FISCAL IMPACT: No net fiscal impact. The costs as determined above will be added to the tax roll as a special assessment on this property and will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary County taxes are collected. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Article 14-6.4 and California Government Code Section 25845 authorize the recovery of abatement costs in public nuisance cases, the recordation of a Notice of Abatement Lien, and inclusion of abatement costs on the tax roll as a special assessment, upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. The Notice and Order to abate was posted on the above-referenced property for a vacant lot with an unpermitted RV and garbage and debris including but not limited to tires, lawn mowers and bicycles and was served on the property owner and all persons known to be in possession of the property by certified mail on January 13, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Crapo, 925-655-2800 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cost Confirmation Hearing for Real Property Located at 549 Grove Ave., Richmond, CA 94801 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The property owner did not file an appeal of the Notice and Order to Abate. The County Abatement Officer abated the nuisance on March 8, 2022. The property owner was billed for the actual cost of the abatement and all administrative costs. The bill was sent by first-class mail to the property owner on March 17, 2022. The property owner did not pay the bill within 45 days of the date of mailing. Notice of this Cost Hearing was sent to the property owner by certified mail by the Clerk of the Board. For proof of service, see Clerk of the Board at 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County will not be able to recover costs for abatement on code violations for this property. ATTACHMENTS Before and After Photos Itemized Abatement Costs CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: January 5, 2023 TO: Clerk of the Board FROM: Department of Conservation & Development By: Conrad Fromme, Building Inspector II RE: Itemized Report of Abatement Costs The following is an itemized report of the costs of abatement for the below described property pursuant to C.C.C. Ord. Code ' 14-6.428. OWNER: Surges, Charles W. POSSESSOR: N/A MORTGAGE HOLDER: N/A ABATEMENT ORDERED DATE: February 19, 2020 ABATEMENT COMPLETED DATE: August 19, 2021 SITE ADDRESS: 460 Memory Lane, Oakley, CA 94561 APN#: 018-280-006 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Residential AMOUNT OF ABATEMENT COSTS (CCC ORDIN ANCE CODE 14-6.428) ITEM EXPLANATION COST Notice to Comply (include first 2 inspections) $ 250.00 Site Visits (8 x $100 @) $ 800.00 Recording Fee $ 17.00 PIRT (Title Search) $ 150.00 Certified Letter & Regular Mailings $ 34.00 Photos $ 2.50 Contractor hired for abatement $ 39,032.00 Final Site Inspection to Confirm Compliance 200.00 Compliance Report and Board Hearing $ 200.00 Total $ 41,170.50 Abatement costs can be paid at or mailed to Department of Conservation and Development, Building Inspection Division, 30 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553. 460 Memory Lane Oakley, CA 94561 Before Photos Go to: •“Insert” on menu bar. Select “picture”. •Go to the “Pictures (N:)” drive in the network directory. •Select the CODE ENF folder. •Select the folder by parcel number/APN •Use search bar in the top of the window to type in the parcel number •In the folder full of pictures, select the photo to be used •Drag and drop, or double-click the picture •It will appear on this screen •Stretch the picture using the little hollow points on the corners, if necessary. 460 Memory Lane Oakley, CA 94561 After Photos RECOMMENDATION(S): OPEN the hearing on the costs of abating a public nuisance on the real property located at 460 Memory Lane, Oakley, in unincorporated Contra Costa County, California. (APN 018-280-006); RECEIVE and CONSIDER the attached itemized report on the abatement costs and any objections thereto from the property owner or other persons with a legal interest in the property; and CLOSE the hearing. DETERMINE the cost of all abatement work and all administrative costs to be $41,170.50. ORDER the itemized report confirmed and DIRECT that it be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. ORDER the costs to be specially assessed against the above-referenced property and AUTHORIZE the recordation of a Notice Of Abatement Lien. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Crapo, 925-655-2800 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cost Confirmation Hearing for Real Property Located at 460 Memory Lane, Oakley, CA 94561 FISCAL IMPACT: No net fiscal impact. The costs as determined above will be added to the tax roll as a special assessment on this property and will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary County taxes are collected. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Article 14-6.4 and California Government Code Section 25845 authorize the recovery of abatement costs in public nuisance cases, the recordation of a Notice of Abatement Lien, and inclusion of abatement costs on the tax roll as a special assessment, upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. The Notice and Order to abate was posted on the above-referenced property for a substandard, fire damaged, vacant building, accumulated garbage and overgrown vegetation and asbestos remediation and was served on the property owner and all persons known to be in possession of the property by certified mail on February 19, 2020. The property owner did not file an appeal of the Notice and Order to Abate. The County Abatement Officer abated the nuisance on August The property owner did not file an appeal of the Notice and Order to Abate. The County Abatement Officer abated the nuisance on August 10, 2021. The property owner was billed for the actual cost of the abatement and all administrative costs. The bill was sent by first-class mail to the property owner on August 19, 2021. The property owner did not pay the bill within 45 days of the date of mailing. Notice of this Cost Hearing was sent to the property owner by certified mail by the Clerk of the Board. For proof of service, see Clerk of the Board at 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County will not be able to recover costs for abatement on code violation for this property. ATTACHMENTS Before and After Photos Itemized Abatement Costs Marla Stuart, MSW PhD Director mstuart@ehsd.cccounty.us EHSD Public Infor mation Sharing Tools Presentation to the Board of Supervisors, February 7, 2023 1 Table of Contents •Information Sharing Landing Page •Interactive Program Data Dashboard •EHSD Programs Maps •Motion 2 Information Sharing Landing Page 3 Information Sharing Landing Page 4 EHSD Interactive Program Data Dashboard 5 EHSD Interactive Dashboard 6 7 New Feature: Monthly Trends 8 Monthly Trend of Number of CalFresh Individuals, January 2016 – September 2022 9 Monthly Trend of Number of Child Protective Services Placements, September 2016 – September 2022 10 All displayed data is available to the public for print or download. 11 EHSD Programs Maps 12 EHSD Programs Maps Overview 13 Maps Viewer 32 1 4 5 14 Map Feature: Layers 15 Map Feature: Data by Zip Code 16 Map Feature: Top Cities by Program 17 Map Feature: Dynamic Counts 18 Map Feature: Color Legend 19 Program Glossary Tab 20 Requested Action 21 Requested Action ACCEPT presentation on new Employment and Human Services (EHSD) public information sharing tools. 22 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT report on new Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) public information sharing tools. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) believes in the power of data to paint a picture of the community it serves and to tell the story of how the department supports it. Since 2019, EHSD has publicly posted monthly data dashboards that show how many people the department assists through key programs such as CalFresh, Medi-Cal and more. In 2022, EHSD and the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) made a dedicated effort to create robust maps and dashboards that depict enrollment in major EHSD programs by Supervisor District, including: Medi-Cal CalFresh CalWORKs Child Protective Services (CPS) In-Home Supportive Services APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Employment and Human Services Department Public Information Sharing Tools Presentation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Adult Protective Services (APS) General Assistance (GA) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Negative action will limit information to the Board of Supervisors about their districts and withhold these exciting new tools from public launch, thus limiting the County’s ability to share a rich picture of its support and engagement with the community it serves. ATTACHMENTS Information Sharing Tools Report THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/6 In the Matter of: The Side Letter Agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the District Attorney Investigators' Association providing for MOU extension, wages, and other benefits. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting solely in its capacity as the governing board of the County of Contra Costa RESOLVES THAT: Effective upon adoption, the attached Side Letter of Agreement dated January 19, 2023, between the County of Contra Costa and the District Attorney Investigators' Association be ADOPTED. Contact: Rebecca Cox, 925-655-2074 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/6 approving the Side Letter between the County of Contra Costa and the District Attorney Investigators' Association providing for MOU extension, wages, and other benefits. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated annual cost of the contract extension is $276,150 for FY 2023/24 for the 5% wage increase effective July 1, 2023, $289,958 for FY 2024/25 for the 5% wage increase effective July 1, 2024, and $304,455 for FY 2025/26 for the 5% wage increase effective July 1, 2025. The total cost of the estimated wage increases for the agreement through June 30,2026 is $870,563. BACKGROUND: The County and the District Attorney Investigators’ Association have executed the attached Side Letter to revise Sections 5.1 – General Wages, Section 6 – Days and Hours of Work, and Section 40.4 – Duration of Agreement , and add Subsection 5.15 – APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Cox, 925-655-2074 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2023/6 – District Attorney Investigators' Association Side Letter for MOU Extension, Wages, and Other Benefits BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Certification Rule. The agreement provides for: 1. Extension of the existing contract from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026; 2. General wage increase of five percent (5%) effective July 1, 2023, five percent (5%) effective July 1, 2024, and five percent (5%) effective July 1, 2025; 3. Modifications to Section 6 – Days and Hours of Work, creating the flexibility for alternate work schedules; 4. Adding Subsection 5.15 – Certification Rule, providing for the certification of all names in recruitments for the classification of District Attorney Senior Inspector. 5. Modifications to Section 9 – On Call/Call Back, allowing for the District Attorney Chief of Inspectors to determine weekly on-call intervals. The terms of the Side Letter will be incorporated into the next MOU between the County and the District Attorney Investigators’ Association. Except as specifically amended or excluded by the Side Letter, all other terms and conditions of the MOU between the County and the District Attorney Investigators’ Association remain unchanged. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The contract will expire June 30, 2023, and employees will not receive the proper wages and benefits. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/6 DAIA Extension Side Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/6 Office of the County Counsel 1025 Escobar Street, 3rd Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Date: February 1, 2023 To: Board of Supervisors From: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant·County Counsel y?- Contra Costa County Phone: (925) 655-2200 Fax: (925) 655-2263 Re: Teleconferencing Options Under the Brown Act for Members of County Boards, Commissions, and Committees SUMMARY Members of the Board of Supervisors may continue attending meetings remotely until the current statewide state of emergency ends on February 28, 2023. Once the state of emergency ends, Board members may participate in meetings remotely under new Brown Act teleconferencing rules that allow Board members to attend remotely for limited reasons and a limited number of times per year. Specifically, these new rules allow individual members of the Board to participate in Board meetings by teleconference for "just cause" reasons or due to "emergency circumstances" when certain legal requirements are met. Board members may also participate in meetings remotely under the traditional Brown Act teleconference option. This option allows individual Board members to participate in meetings by teleconference if the location from where they are participating is listed on the agenda and other legal requirements are met. In addition to applying to the Board of Supervisors, the new teleconferencing rules and the traditional teleconferencing option apply to all County boards, commissions, and committees that are subject to the Brown Act. These County boards, commissions, and committees are considered "legislative bodies" under the Brown Act and include, in addition to the Board of Supervisors: (1) committees created by statute; (2) committees created by formal action of the Board of Supervisors, whether composed of lay persons or a combination of lay persons and Board members; (3) standing committees, composed solely of members of the Board, that have a continuing subject matter jurisdiction (for example, the Board's Internal Operations committee); and (4) standing committees created by a Board-appointed committee and composed solely of members of that body (for example, a subcommittee of the Mental Health Commission). Once the state of emergency ends on February 28, all members of County legislative bodies will be required to meet in person unless they attend remotely under the new or traditional Brown Act teleconferencing rules. The Board of Supervisors previously directed that meetings of County legislative bodies provide for remote attendance by the public. These "hybrid" meetings, which allow in-person and remote attendance, may continue unless the Board of Supervisors directs otherwise, but as discussed below, some form of remote public participation must be in place for members of legislative bodies to use the new "just cause" or "emergency circumstances" options. Board of Supervisors February 1, 2023 Page 2 of 4 TELECONFERENCING OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO ALL COUNTY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES 1. Teleconferencing Is Allowed Under the Brown Act for "Just Cause" Reasons or Under "Emergency Circumstances" Assembly Bill 2449 amended the Brown Act (Government Code sections 54950-54963) to provide an alternative to the traditional Brown Act teleconferencing rules. Specifically, AB 2449 amended Government Code section 54953 to permit individual members of a County legislative body to participate in meetings by teleconference for "just cause" or due to "emergency circumstances" when certain legal requirements are met. (Gov. Code, § 53953(£).) Teleconference Participation for Just Cause. If a member of a County legislative body wishes to attend a meeting remotely for "just cause," the member must notify the County legislative body at the earliest opportunity, up to and including the start of a regular meeting, of the need to participate remotely. The member must provide a general description of one of the following "just cause" circumstances: • There is a childcare or caregiving need for a child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner. • A contagious illness that prevents the member from attending in person. • A need related to a physical or mental disability that is not otherwise accommodated for. • Travel while on official business of the County legislative body or another state or local agency. Teleconference Participation for Emergency Circumstances. If a member of a County legislative body wishes to attend a meeting remotely due to "emergency circumstances," the member must provide a general description of the need to appear remotely, which need not exceed 20 words or include any personal medical information. The member must make the request to participate remotely as soon as possible. "Emergency circumstances" means a physical or family medical emergency that prevents a member from attending in person. Legislative Body Action Requirements. The County legislative body need not take action to allow a member to attendremotely for "just cause." To allow a member to attend remotely for "emergency circumstances," the County legislative body must take action on the request at the meeting. If there is insufficient time to include the item on a posted agenda, the County legislative body may take action on the request at the beginning of the meeting. Approval for the member to participate remotely based onthe "emergency circumstances" exception must be by majority vote. The member requesting the remote appearance may not vote on the request or be counted as part of the quorum until the legislative body approved the "emergency circumstances" exception. Participation Requirements. A member appearing by teleconference under one of the AB 2449 options must participate in the meeting through both audio and visual technology. Disclosure Requirements. A member appearing by teleconference under an AB 2449 option must publicly disclose at the meeting whether any other individuals 18 years or older are in the room at the remote location withthe member and must publicly disclose the general nature Board of Supervisors February 1, 2023 Page 3 of 4 of the member's relationship with these individuals. This disclosure must occur before any action is taken. Quorum Required. If a teleconference meeting is conducted with a member participating under an AB 2449 option, at least a quorum of the County legislative body must participate in person, and the quorum must meet in a single, physical location identified on the agenda that is open to the public and situated within the County. Limitations on Number of Remote Appearances. A member may not use a "just cause" reason to appear remotely for more than two meetings per calendar year. In total, a member may not participate remotely under an AB 2449 option for more than three consecutive months or 20 percent of the regular meetings of the County legislative body within the calendar year, or for more than two meetings if the body regularly meets less than 10 times per year. Roll Call. All votes taken during a teleconference meeting conducted under this option must be by roll call. Technological and Access Requirements. If a member participates remotely under an AB 2449 option, the County legislative body must also provide either a two-way audiovisual platform, or a two-way telephonic service and a live webcasting of the meeting, so that the public may remotely hear and visually observe the meeting, and remotely address the legislative body. The body must provide notice and post agendas as otherwise required under the Brown Act and must indicate on the notice how the public may access the meeting and offer comment. The agenda must include an opportunity for all persons to attend and address the legislative body via a call-in option, via an internet-based service option, and at the in-person location of the meeting. If the broadcasting of the meeting to the public by phone or internet service is disrupted, or a disruption within the local agency's control prevents members of the public from commenting using the phone or internet service, the legislative body may not take any action at the meeting until public access to the meeting via the phone option or the internet service option is restored. Actions taken on agenda items during a disruption that prevents the legislative body from broadcasting the meeting may be subject to legal challenge. When a member appears remotely for a just cause or emergency circumstances reason, the Brown Act does not require that the agency post an agenda at the remote location, include the address of the remote location, or provide for public access to the remote location. The body may not require public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and must allow the public to address the body and comment in real time. An individual may be required to register for public comment before being allowed to provide comment, where the body uses a third-party platform (like Zoom) for the meeting. The Brown Act rules allowing "just cause" or "emergency circumstances" participation remain in effect through 2025. Beginning January 1, 2026, only the traditional Brown Act teleconference rules will be available (unless further legislation is adopted in the meantime). Board of Supervisors February 1, 2023 Page 4 of 4 2. Teleconferencing Under Traditional Brown Act Rules Members of County legislative bodies also may continue to participate remotely under the traditional Brown Act teleconferencing rules in Government Code section 54953(b). Under these rules: TLG: • At least a quorum of the legislative body must participate from locations in the County. • Each telephone conference location and the meeting location must be shown on the agenda for the meeting. In addition, the agenda must provide an opportunity for members of the public to give public comment from each teleconference location. • In addition to the usual agenda-posting agenda locations and the County website, an agenda must be posted at each teleconference location at least 96 hours in advance of the meeting under the County's Better Government Ordinance, or at least 24 in advance for a special meeting. • Each teleconference location must be open and accessible to members of the public. • All votes taken during a teleconference meeting must be by roll call. H:\2023\Board of Supervisors\teleconferencing memo -boards and commissions.BOS 2.7.23.docx Recommendations for safely holding public meetings Each local government agency is authorized to determine whether to hold public meetings in person, on-line (teleconferencing only), or via a combination of methods. The following are recommendations from the Contra Costa County Health Officer to minimize the risk of COVID 19 transmission during a public meeting. 1. Online meetings (i.e. teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged, where practical, as these meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID 19. This is particularly important when community prevalence rates are high. Our current trends as of February 1, 2023 in Covid-19 case rate, test positivity, Covid-19 hospitalizations, and Covid-19 wastewater surveillance are decreasing, but there continues to be COVID-19 in the community and changes in case rate, test positivity, COVID-19 hospitalization and wastewater surveillance may change or increase rapidly. In addition to this, the predominant variant of Covid-19 being identified continues to be the Omicron variant and it’s subvariants the impact of which on the spread of Covid-19 has shown to dramatically increase COVID-19 transmission. 2. If a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended, when possible, to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person. 3. A written safety protocol should be developed and followed. It is recommended that the protocol require social distancing, where feasible – i.e. six feet of separation between attendees; and consider requiring or strongly encouraging face masking of all attendees and encouraging attendees to be up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccine. 4. Seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times. 5. Consider holding public meetings outdoors. Increasing scientific consensus is that outdoor airflow reduces the risk of COVID-19 transmission compared to indoor spaces. Hosting events outdoors also may make it easier to space staff and members of the public at least 6 feet apart. If unable to host outdoors, consider ways to increase ventilation and flow of the indoor space to reduce the risk of COVID-19 while indoors. 6. Current evidence is unclear as to the added benefit of temperature checks in addition to symptom checks. We encourage focus on symptom checks as they may screen out individuals with other Covid-19 symptoms besides fever and help reinforce the message to not go out in public if you are not feeling well. 7. Consider a voluntary attendance sheet with names and contact information to assist in contact tracing of any cases linked to a public meeting. Revised 2-1-2023 Sefanit Mekuria, MD, MPH Deputy Health Officer, Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the Board of Supervisors has reconsidered the circumstances of the Statewide state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, and that the County Health Officer’s recommendations for safely holding public meetings, which recommend virtual meetings and other measures to promote social distancing, are still in effect. 2. AUTHORIZE the Board of Supervisors, in its capacity as the governing board of the County, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and the Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, and its subcommittees, to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) through February 28, 2023. 3. AUTHORIZE all County advisory boards, committees, and commissions to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) through February 28, 2023. 4. REQUIRE any County advisory boards, commissions, and committees that hold in-person meetings before March 1, 2023, to conduct these meetings in a “hybrid” format that allows members of the Countywide body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors D.6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Teleconference Meetings Under the Brown Act RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) remotely and in person. 5. RECEIVE an update on teleconference meeting procedures that begin March 1, 2023. 6. PROVIDE direction to staff on conducting meetings of County boards, commissions, and committees in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Brown Act, including holding hybrid meetings that allow the public to attend meetings remotely and in person. FISCAL IMPACT: This is an administrative action with no direct fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On October 5, 2021, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2021/327, which authorized the Board, in all its capacities, and certain subcommittees and advisory bodies, to conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e). This section of the Brown Act, which was added by Assembly Bill 361, allows a local agency to use special teleconferencing rules during a State declared state of emergency. When a legislative body uses the emergency teleconferencing provisions under Government code section 54953(e), the following rules apply: The agency must provide notice of the meeting and post an agenda as required by the Brown Act and Better Government Ordinance, but the agenda does not need to list each teleconference location or be physically posted at each teleconference location. The agenda must state how members of the public can access the meeting and provide public comment. The agenda must include an option for all persons to attend via a call-in or internet-based service option. The body must conduct the meeting in a manner that protects the constitutional and statutory rights of the public. If there is a disruption in the public broadcast of the meeting, or of the public's ability to comment virtually for reasons within the body's control, the legislative body must stop the meeting and take no further action on agenda items until public access and/or ability to comment is restored. Local agencies may not require public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and must allow virtual comments to be submitted in real time. The body must allow a reasonable amount of time per agenda item to permit members of the public to comment, including time to register or otherwise be recognized for the purposes of comment. If the body provides a timed period for all public comment on an item, it may not close that period before the time has elapsed. Under Government Code section 54953(e), if the local agency wishes to continue using these special teleconferencing rules after adopting an initial resolution, the legislative body must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency every 30 days and make certain findings. The agency must find that the Statewide state of emergency continues to exist and that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. The Board last considered these matters on January 10, 2023, made the required findings and authorized continued use of special teleconferencing rules. The Board can again find that the Statewide state of emergency continues to exist and that the County Health Officer's recommendations for safely holding public meetings, which recommend virtual meetings and other measures to promote social distancing, are still in effect. The Statewide state of emergency ends on February 28, 2023. Once the state of emergency ends, Board members may participate in meetings remotely under new Brown Act teleconferencing rules that allow Board members to attend remotely for limited reasons and a limited number of times per year. Board members may also participate in meetings remotely under the traditional Brown Act teleconference option. In addition to applying to the Board of Supervisors, the new teleconferencing rules and the traditional teleconferencing option apply to all County boards, commissions, and committees that are subject to the Brown Act. A memo describing the new teleconferencing rules and the traditional teleconferencing option is attached to this Board order. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board, in all its capacities, and its subcommittees and advisory bodies, would not be authorized to conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) through February 28, 2023. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Name Not Given; Renee, Chair, Economic Opportunity Council; Stephanie; No Name Given. ADOPTED the recommendations as presented; and DIRECTED the County Administrator's Office to work with the Clerk of the Board's office to identify additional common meeting locations for county commissions to hold hybrid meetings including the libraries. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Health Officer's Recommendations Attachment B - Memo Re: Teleconferencing Options Under the Brown Act for Members of County Boards, Commissions, and Committees THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/23 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving and Authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Lillian Street between 2nd Avenue and 7th Avenue, and all of 7th Avenue and Del Mar Circle, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of an infrastructure renewal project, including the replacement of 1,375' of 6" water main, Crockett area. (District V) RC23-1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to East Bay Municipal Utility District to fully close Lillian Street between 2nd Avenue and 7th Avenue, and all of 7th Avenue and Del Mar Circle, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023, for the period of 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via roads identified in a traffic control plan, reviewed by the Public Works Department. Emergency vehicles, residents within the construction area and essential services will be allowed access as required. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. East Bay Municipal Utility District shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Kellen O'Connor - Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Chris Lau - Maintenance, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/23 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Lillian Street between 2nd Avenue and 7th Avenue, and all of 7th Avenue and Del Mar Circle, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of an infrastructure renewal project including the replacement of 1,375' of 6” water main, service transfers, hydrants and connections, Crockett area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Applicant, East Bay Municipal Utility District, shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. The roads in Crockett at the construction site are narrow and not conducive to safely keeping one lane of two-way traffic open during construction. Therefore, it is recommended to close the road to through traffic during construction hours to increase traffic safety and to improve construction efficiency to help shorten the duration of work in the right of way. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Kellen O'Connor - Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Chris Lau - Maintenance, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve & Authorize to fully close a portion of several roads, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023, Crockett area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2023/23 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/23 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/24 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Grizzly Peak Boulevard between Kenyon Avenue and Plateau Drive, Lake Drive between Kenyon Avenue and Beloit Avenue, and all of Plateau Drive, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of an infrastructure renewal project including the replacement of 1,875' of water main, Kensington area. (District I) RC23-2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to East Bay Municipal Utility District to fully close Grizzly Peak Boulevard between Kenyon Avenue and Plateau Drive, Lake Drive between Kenyon Avenue and Beloit Avenue, and all of Plateau Drive, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023 for the period of 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via roads identified in a traffic control plan, reviewed by the Public Works Department. Emergency vehicles, residents within the construction area and essential services will be allowed access as required. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. East Bay Municipal Utility District shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 674-7744 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Kellen O'Connor - Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Chris Lau - Maintenance, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/24 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Grizzly Peak Boulevard between Kenyon Avenue and Plateau Drive, Lake Drive between Kenyon Avenue and Beloit Avenue, and all of Plateau Drive, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of an infrastructure renewal project including the replacement of 1,875' of water main, Kensington area. (District I) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Applicant, East Bay Municipal Utility District, shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. The roads in Kensington at the construction site are narrow and not conducive to safely keeping one lane of two-way traffic open during construction. Therefore, it is recommended to close the road to through traffic during construction hours to increase traffic safety and to improve construction efficiency to help shorten the duration of work in the right of way. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 674-7744 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Kellen O'Connor - Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Chris Lau - Maintenance, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve & Authorize to fully close a portion of several roads, between February 8, 2023 and April 28, 2023, Kensington area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2023/24 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/24 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Acquisition Acceptances dated July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, approved by the Public Works Director for the acquisitions of any interest in real property where the purchase price for the real property interest did not exceed $100,000 in the Alamo, Brentwood, Byron, Clayton, and San Pablo areas. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Contra Costa County, Ordinance Code 2019-35, Title 11, Division 1108, Chapter 1108-8.002, “The Board of Supervisors authorizes the Public Works Director, or designee, to perform all acts necessary to approve and accept for the County the acquisition of any interest in real property where the purchase price for the real property interest does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000).” The Public Works Director shall submit a semi-annual report to the Board of Supervisors on each acquisition done pursuant to this section, including the interest acquired, its price, and the necessity for the purchase, which is described in the attached Semi-Annual Acceptance Report. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors would not be informed of the acquisitions accepted by the Public Works Director pursuant to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessica L. Dillingham, 925.957.2453 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:ACCEPT the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Acquisition Acceptances dated July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. ATTACHMENTS 2022 Semi-Annual Acceptance Report THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Traffic Resolution on February 7, 2023 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2023/4527 ABSTAIN: Supervisorial District V SUBJECT: Prohibit parking at all times, except for those vehicles displaying a special identification license plate or distinguishing placard issued to those individuals with disabilities, on a portion of Wanda Street (Road No. 2295Q), Crockett area. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors RESOLVES that: Based on recommendations by the County Public Works Department's Transportation Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established: Pursuant to Sections 22507 and 22511.7 of the California Vehicle Code declaring parking to be prohibited at all times, except for vehicles of individuals with disabilities (blue curb), on the north side of Wanda Street (Road No. 2295Q), beginning at a point 70 feet east of the east roadway edge of 3rd Avenue (Road No. 2295AX), and continuing easterly a distance of 20 feet, Crockett area. JS:sr Orig. Dept: Public Works (Traffic) Contact: Monish Sen (925-313-2187) cc: California Highway Patrol Sheriff Department TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2023/4527 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct Copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By , Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Traffic Resolution No. 2023/4527 to prohibit stopping, standing, or parking at all times, except for those vehicles of individuals with disabilities (blue curb) on the north side of Wanda Street (Road No. 2295Q), beginning at a point 70 feet east of the east roadway edge of 3rd Avenue (Road No. 2295AX) and continuing easterly a distance of 20 feet, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Crockett area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering staff was contacted by a resident requesting a residential disabled parking space. Traffic Engineering staff responded by conducting an assessment, including a field visit to 1126 Wanda Street in Crockett. The onsite assessment confirmed that the property in question did not have a driveway. Evidence of disability by the resident was also provided. Therefore, since the minimum criteria was met to designate a disabled persons parking space in front of the requestor’s residence, it is recommended the action to restrict parking for only disabled users be granted. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Parking will remain unrestricted at this location. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Monish Sen, 925.313.2187 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Prohibit parking on the north side of Wanda Street (Road No. 2295Q), Crockett area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Traffic Resolution No. 2022/4527 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Traffic Resolution No. 2023/4527 RESOLUTION NO. 2023/38 PAGE 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT B TDA Article 3 Project Application Form 1. Agency Contra Costa County Public Works Department 2. Primary Contact Joe Smithonic 3. Mailing Address 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 4. Email Address Joe.Smithonic@pw.cccounty.us 5. Phone Number (925) 313-2348 6. Secondary Contact (in the event primary is not available) Jeff Valeros 7. Mailing address (if different) N/A☒ 8. Email Address Jeff.Valeros@pw.cccounty.us 9. Phone Number (925) 313-2031 10. Send allocation instructions to (if different from above): 11. Project Title San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path 12. Amount requested $120,000 13. Fiscal Year of Claim 2023/24 14. Description of Overall Project: 15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.) 16. Project Location: A map of the project location is attached or a link to an online map of the project location is provided below: Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only) 17. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Yes☐ No☒ 18. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Yes☐ No☒ Construct a pedestrian path along the south side of San Miguel Drive in unincorporated Contra Costa County from Blackwood Drive to Adeline Drive, approximately 1,100 linear feet, and in the City of Walnut Creek from Newell Avenue to Blackwood Drive, approximately 1,000 linear feet. Engineering and Construction costs. A map of the project location is attached. RESOLUTION NO. 2023/38 PAGE 2 of 2 19. Project Budget and Schedule Project Eligibility A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes☒ No☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda. December 12, 2022 If "NO," provide an explanation). B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes☐ No☒ If "NO," provide expected date: February 7, 2023 C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes☐ No☒ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page) D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes☐ No☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? N/A☒ E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes☒ No☐ Existing Facility? 2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes☐ No☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☒ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate. F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): June 2025 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes☒ No☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement. H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project? Yes☒ No☐ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets Project Phase TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost Estimated Completion (month/year) Bike/Ped Plan ENV 6,000 6,000 01/2023 PA&ED 23,000 23,000 06/2024 PS&E 90,000 3,000 93,000 12/2024 ROW 47,000 47,000 03/2025 CON 30,000 1,242,000 1,272,000 06/2025 Total Cost 120,000 1,321,000 1,441,000 RESOLUTION NO. 2023/38 ATTACHMENT A Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding FINDINGS 1. That Contra Costa County is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is Contra Costa County legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in “Attachment B” of this resolution. 2. That Contra Costa County has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right of way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right of way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). 7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or final design and engineering or quick build project; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway, which is closed to motorized traffic and/or Class IV separated bikeway; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by Contra Costa County within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.) or responds to an immediate community need, such as a quick-build project. 9. That any project described in Attachment B bicycle project meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in the California Highway Design Manual or is in a National Association of City and Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidance or similar best practices document. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed in the allocated time (fiscal year of allocation plus two additional fiscal years). 11. That Contra Costa County agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public. G:\engsvc\ENVIRO\TransEng\San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path (TDA) (WO1025)\CEQA\CEQA Documents\NOE\Admin D2\NOE_Final.docx Revised 2018 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Notice of Exemption To: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 From: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 County Clerk, County of Contra Costa Project Title: San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path, Project #: WO1025, CP#: 22-45 Project Applicant: Contra Costa County Public Works Dept., 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez CA 94553 Main: (925) 313-2000, Contact: Sandeep Singh, (925) 313-2022 Project Location: San Miguel Drive between Newell Avenue to Adeline Drive, City of Walnut Creek and unincorporated Walnut Creek, Contra Costa County Lead Agency: Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 Main: (925) 655-2705, Contact: Syd Sotoodeh (925) 655-2877 Project Description: The project consists of constructing an all-weather, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant pedestrian path on the south side of San Miguel Drive. The new pedestrian path will be constructed as an asphalt path with berm in unincorporated Walnut Creek, and as a concrete sidewalk with curb and gutter in the City of Walnut Creek. Existing shoulder material will be removed. Conforms between the existing residential driveways and new sidewalk will be constructed. Drainage improvements, such as new storm drain lines and inlet relocations, will be installed as needed. Existing roadside trees and residential improvements will be protected in place where feasible. Construction is anticipated to occur in 2025 and take approximately 60 days to complete. No night or weekend work will occur. Real Estate transactions, utility relocations, temporary traffic control, and tree and vegetation trimming may be necessary. Exempt Status: Ministerial Project (Sec. 21080[b][1]; 15268) Categorical Exemption: Class 1(c) Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080[b][3]; 15269[a]) General Rule of Applicability (Sec. 15061[b][3]) Emergency Project (Sec. 21080[b][4]; 15269[b][c]) Other Statutory Exemption (Sec. ) Reasons why project is exempt: The activity consists of constructing an ADA-compliant pedestrian path along an existing street with no expansion of use, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA Guidelines. If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: Date: _____________ Title: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant 01/23/2023 Senior Planner G:\engsvc\ENVIRO\TransEng\San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path (TDA) (WO1025)\CEQA\CEQA Documents\NOE\Admin D2\NOE_Final.docx Revised 2018 AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant Department of Fish and Wildlife Fees Due Public Works Department De Minimis Finding - $0 255 Glacier Drive County Clerk - $50 Martinez, CA 94553 Conservation and Development - $25 Attn: Sandeep Singh Environmental Services Division Phone: (925) 313-2022 Total Due: $75 Receipt #: SHEET OF DATE: DB: CB: PROJECT LOCATION MAP San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path JS NOV 2 2 1 1 255 GLACIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CA 94553 PH: (925)313-2000 FAX: (925)313-2333 4 Bay Point JV Figure 1: Regional Location Map 0 0.250.125 Miles 255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 PROJECT VICINITY MAP - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path FEDERAL ID NO:DB: CB:DATE:JS JAN 2023 1 1Page of ^ JV S o u t h B r o a dw a y Andrea Dr Adeline DrS. Ma in St San Miguel Dr Project Begin Las Lomas High School Broadway Plaza / Downtown Walnut Creek Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Project End I ron Ho r se Reg iona l T ra i l Blackwood Dr± S a n M i g u e l D r Newell Ave CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CITY OF WALNUT CREEK Figure 2: Project Vicinity Map AN D R E A D R NEWELL AVESAN MIGUEL DRSAN MIGUEL DRProject BeginEL MIRADOR LEGENDConcrete SidewalkAsphalt at GradeDetectable Warning SurfaceAsphalt BermProposed / Existing Storm DrainPotential ObstructionTree Within ProjectFile Path G:\transeng\GRANTS\Transportation Development Act (TDA)\TDA 23-24\Applications\San Miguel Pedestrian Path\Attachments\7 - Layout (v2, 2023-0103).dwg Plot Date:1/4/2023 9:36:51 AMContra Costa CountyPublic Works Department255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333CONCEPTUAL PLANSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PEDESTRIAN PATHNEWELL AVENUE TO ADELINE DRIVE DRAWN BY: JS CHECKED BY: JV SHEET: 1 OF 5 DATE: 01/03/2023 CAD FILE:SCALE:1'' = 15' CHECKED BY: JVSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PED PATHNOTES:1. Sidewalk within City of Walnut Creek shallconform to City Standard Plans CC-1 to CC-9.2. Drainage has not been finalized.3. Utility poles will typically have an AC dike or6" curb, 10' before and after the pole, whenpossible.4. Obstructions may need to be relocated.5. Conform pathway to existing driveways.6. Curb ramps are Type C unless otherwisenoted. Proposed curb ramp cases maychange upon further design and as dictatedby site conditions.Install Case A rampModify existingramp to Case CFire hydrantRelocate drainage inletCity Limits14' Existing Travel LaneRelocate stop barbehind path of travel5' Typ.Figure 3: Sheet 1 of 5 SANT A R I T A D R MEADOW CREEK CT SAN MIGUEL DRFile Path G:\transeng\GRANTS\Transportation Development Act (TDA)\TDA 23-24\Applications\San Miguel Pedestrian Path\Attachments\7 - Layout (v2, 2023-0103).dwg Plot Date:1/4/2023 9:37:55 AMContra Costa CountyPublic Works Department255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333CONCEPTUAL PLANSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PEDESTRIAN PATHNEWELL AVENUE TO ADELINE DRIVE DRAWN BY: JS CHECKED BY: JV SHEET: 2 OF 5 DATE: 01/03/2023 CAD FILE:SCALE:1'' = 15' CHECKED BY: JVSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PED PATHRetaining walls12' Existing Travel Lane5' Typ.Figure 3: Sheet 2 of 5 BLACKWOOD DR SAN MIGUEL DRCITY OF WALNUT CREEK COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTAFile Path G:\transeng\GRANTS\Transportation Development Act (TDA)\TDA 23-24\Applications\San Miguel Pedestrian Path\Attachments\7 - Layout (v2, 2023-0103).dwg Plot Date:1/4/2023 9:43:19 AMContra Costa CountyPublic Works Department255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333CONCEPTUAL PLANSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PEDESTRIAN PATHNEWELL AVENUE TO ADELINE DRIVE DRAWN BY: JS CHECKED BY: JV SHEET: 3 OF 5 DATE: 01/03/2023 CAD FILE:SCALE:1'' = 15' CHECKED BY: JVSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PED PATHMailboxUtility poleRelocatedrainage inletEdge ofpavementEdge of pavementUtility pole11' Existing Travel Lane12' Existing Travel Lane5' Typ.5' Typ.Stripe crosswalkRelocate stop barbehind path of travelFigure 3: Sheet 3 of 5 EL CAMINO CORTOCITY OF WALNUT CREEKCOUNTY OF CONTRA COSTASAN MIGUEL DRFile Path G:\transeng\GRANTS\Transportation Development Act (TDA)\TDA 23-24\Applications\San Miguel Pedestrian Path\Attachments\7 - Layout (v2, 2023-0103).dwg Plot Date:1/4/2023 9:44:48 AMContra Costa CountyPublic Works Department255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333CONCEPTUAL PLANSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PEDESTRIAN PATHNEWELL AVENUE TO ADELINE DRIVE DRAWN BY: JS CHECKED BY: JV SHEET: 4 OF 5 DATE: 01/03/2023 CAD FILE:SCALE:1'' = 15' CHECKED BY: JVSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PED PATHUtility poleUtility polePlace porous rubberized surfaceunder existing drip line of tree11' Existing Travel Lane5' Typ.Figure 3: Sheet 4 of 5 A D E L I N E D R NOR R I S R D EL CAMINO CORTO SAN MIGUEL DRProject EndCITY OF WALNUT CREEK COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTAFile Path G:\transeng\GRANTS\Transportation Development Act (TDA)\TDA 23-24\Applications\San Miguel Pedestrian Path\Attachments\7 - Layout (v2, 2023-0103).dwg Plot Date:1/4/2023 9:45:12 AMContra Costa CountyPublic Works Department255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333CONCEPTUAL PLANSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PEDESTRIAN PATHNEWELL AVENUE TO ADELINE DRIVE DRAWN BY: JS CHECKED BY: JV SHEET: 5 OF 5 DATE: 01/03/2023 CAD FILE:SCALE:1'' = 15' CHECKED BY: JVSAN MIGUEL DRIVE PED PATHRelocate stop barbehind path of travel11' Existing Travel Lane5' Typ.Figure 3: Sheet 5 of 5 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/38 IN THE MATTER OF approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the total amount of $120,000 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 for the San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path Project. WHEREAS, Article 3 of the TDA, Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, MTC, as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised, entitled “Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects,” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of “TDA Article 3” funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised, requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Contra Costa County declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of Contra Costa County to carry out the project; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Contra Costa County attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. Contact: Sandeep Singh, 925.313.2022 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/38 to APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the total amount of $120,000 for the fiscal year 2023/2024 for the San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path Project. APPROVE the San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path Project, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project, Walnut Creek area. [County Project No. WO1025, DCD-CP#22-45] (District IV). DETERMINE the Project is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1(c) Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of Conservation and Development, or designee, to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandeep Singh, 925.313.2022 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Path Project and take related actions under CEQA FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Project cost: $1,501,000. (8% Transportation Development Act Funds, 63% City of Walnut Creek Funds, 29% Central County Area of Benefit Funds) BACKGROUND: The project consists of constructing an all-weather, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant pedestrian path on the south side of San Miguel Drive. The new pedestrian path will be constructed as an asphalt path with berm in unincorporated Walnut Creek, and as a concrete sidewalk with curb and gutter in the City of Walnut Creek. Existing shoulder material will be removed. Conforms between the existing residential driveways and new sidewalk will be constructed. Drainage improvements, such as new storm drain lines and inlet relocations, will be installed as needed. Existing roadside trees and residential improvements will be protected in place where feasible. Construction is anticipated to occur in 2025 and take approximately 60 days to complete. No night or weekend work will occur. Real Estate transactions, utility relocations, temporary traffic control, and tree and vegetation trimming may be necessary. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CEQA clearance is a requirement for TDA grant eligibility. If TDA funding is not obtained, the Project will not be constructed. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2023/38 CEQA Attachment A for Resolution Attachment B for Resolution MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/38 RESOLUTION NO. 2023/39 PAGE 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT B TDA Article 3 Project Application Form 1. Agency Contra Costa County Public Works Department 2. Primary Contact Joe Smithonic 3. Mailing Address 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 4. Email Address Joe.Smithonic@pw.cccounty.us 5. Phone Number (925)313-2348 6. Secondary Contact (in the event primary is not available) Deborah Preciado 7. Mailing address (if different) N/A☒ 8. Email Address Deborah.Preciado@pw.cccounty.us 9. Phone Number (925)313-2267 10. Send allocation instructions to (if different from above): 11. Project Title Kevin Drive Bike Lanes 12. Amount requested $120,000 13. Fiscal Year of Claim 2023/2024 14. Description of Overall Project: 15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.) 16. Project Location: A map of the project location is attached or a link to an online map of the project location is provided below: 17. Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only) 18. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Yes☒ No☐ 19. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Yes☐ No☒ Resurface and restripe Kevin Drive in Bay Point area from Port Chicago Highway to Willow Pass Road to add buffered bike lanes and sharrows, approximately 3,600 linear feet. Engineering and Construction costs. Bay Point RESOLUTION NO. 2023/39 PAGE 2 of 2 20. Project Budget and Schedule Project Eligibility A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes☒ No☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda: December 12, 2022 If "NO," provide an explanation). B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes☐ No☒ If "NO," provide expected date: February 7, 2023 C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes☐ No☒ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page) D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes☒ No☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes☒ No☐ Existing Facility? 2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes☐ No☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☒ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate. F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): September 2023 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes☒ No☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement. H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project? Yes☒ No☐ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets Project Phase TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost Estimated Completion (month/year) Bike/Ped Plan - ENV 5,000 5,000 05/2022 PA&ED 22,000 22,000 01/2023 PS&E - 43,000 43,000 03/2023 ROW - CON 120,000 129,000 249,000 09/2023 Total Cost 120,000 199,000 319,000 RESOLUTION NO. 2023/39 ATTACHMENT A Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding FINDINGS 1. That Contra Costa County is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is Contra Costa County legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in “Attachment B” of this resolution. 2. That Contra Costa County has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right of way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right of way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). 7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or final design and engineering or quick build project; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway, which is closed to motorized traffic and/or Class IV separated bikeway; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by Contra Costa County within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B, which are bicycle projects, have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.) or responds to an immediate community need, such as a quick-build project. 9. That any project described in Attachment B bicycle project meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in the California Highway Design Manual or is in a National Association of City and Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidance or similar best practices document. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed in the allocated time (fiscal year of allocation plus two additional fiscal years). 11. That Contra Costa County agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public. FIGURE 1: Regional Location Map THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/39 IN THE MATTER OF approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the total amount of $120,000 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 for the Kevin Drive Bike Lanes Project. WHEREAS, Article 3 of the TDA, Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, MTC, as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised, entitled “Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects,” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of “TDA Article 3” funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised, requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Contra Costa County declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of Contra Costa County to carry out the project; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Contra Costa County attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Contra Costa County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. Contact: Sandeep Singh, 925.313.2022 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/39 to APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to submit a 2023/2024 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Grant Application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in the total amount of $120,000 for the fiscal year 2023/2024 for the Kevin Drive Bike Lanes Project. APPROVE the Kevin Drive Bike Lanes Project, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project, Bay Point area. [County Project No. WO1025, DCD-CP#22-07] (District V) DETERMINE the Project is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1(c) Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of Conservation and Development, or designee, to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandeep Singh, 925.313.2022 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Kevin Drive Bike Lanes Project and take related actions under CEQA FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Project cost: $384,000. (31% Transportation Development Act Funds, 69% Local Road Funds) BACKGROUND: This project aims to install a combination of buffered bike lanes and sharrows along the entire length of Kevin Drive within the residential community centered around Lynbrook Park in Bay Point. This project proposes to restripe Kevin Drive from Port Chicago Highway to Willow Pass Road, approximately 3,600 linear feet, to incorporate buffered bike lanes through the residential neighborhood. Class III sharrows will be installed for approximately 600 linear feet affronting the park in the eastbound direction between Shellie Court and Kenneth Court. This project was included in the CEQA review for the 2022 Countywide Surface Treatment Project, which includes maintaining and rehabilitating various roads, including Kevin Drive in Bay Point, with pavement preparation and re-application of pavement striping and marking with some modifications to accommodate bicycle facilities. The CEQA was posted at the County Clerk office on March 7, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CEQA clearance is a requirement for TDA grant eligibility. If TDA funding is not obtained, the Project will not be constructed. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2023/39 CEQA Attachment A to Resolution Attachment B to Resolution MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/39 1 PERMIT #651-21 TBM: FILE #651-21 INSPECTION AREA C Form Rev 7/8/20 Application and Permit Center ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR USE OF DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY PERMITTEE: 3483 GOLDEN GATE WAY, LLC ADDRESS: 155 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 950 CITY/STATE/ZIP: OAKLAND, CA 94612 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (510) 452-2944 FAX: CONTACT PERSON: BOB HUFF TELEPHONE NUMBER: (510) 715-5492 EMAIL ADDRESS: BOB@MADISONPARK.COM PLEASE READ ALL SECTIONS OF THIS PERMIT CAREFULLY AND KEEP IT AT THE WORK SITE. The permittee agrees to defend, save, indemnify and hold harmless the County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), their officers, employees and agents from all liabilities imposed by law by reason of injury to or death of any person(s) or damage to property, including without limitation liability for trespass, nuisance or inverse condemnation, which may arise out of the work covered by this permit, and does agree to defend the County and District, their officers, employees and agents against any such claim or action asserting such liability. Accepting this permit or starting any work hereunder shall constitute acceptance and agreement to all of the conditions and requirements of this permit and the Ordinance and Specifications authorizing issuance of such permit. In compliance with your request, and subject to all of the terms, conditions and restrictions written below or given as general or special provisions on any part of this form, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: LOCATION: Lafayette Creek @ 3483 Golden Gate Way, Lafayette APN’s 243-232-027 & 243-232-028 LATITUDE: 37° 53' 27.98" N LONGITUDE: 122° 06' 55.82" W PERMITTED USE: Construction of a multifamily development adjacent to and within the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s easement for the Lafayette Creek flood control channel.  Work Completed Inspector: Approved Start Date: February 1, 2023  Expired  Looks OK – No Inspection Requested Date: Expiration Date: July 15, 2024  Flood Control – OK to Final Engineer: Date: 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553-4825 Phone: (925) 374-2136 • Fax (925) 674-7271 • email: pw.permits@pw.cccounty.us www.cccpublicworks.org 2 Encroachment Permit for Use of District Right of Way (Cont’d) Page 2 Items Attached or Referred to Herein and Made Part Hereof: 1. General Provisions, Sheets GP-6 through GP-8, attached. Special Provisions: 1. PERMITTEE must schedule an inspection from the Public Works Construction Division at least 48 hours before starting any work under this permit. The PERMITTEE shall arrange for an inspection by phoning Jon Suemnick @ (925) 595-6010 or email jon.suemnick@pw.cccounty.us. 2. This permit is issued to 3483 Golden Gate Way, LLC (PERMITTEE) for construction of a multifamily development that encroaches onto the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) Lafayette Creek easement located southeast of the intersection of Golden Gate Way and First Street (APNs 243-232-027 and 243-232- 028) in the City of Lafayette. The PERMITTEE’s improvements include grading, an outfall, and landscaping. 3. PERMITTEE and its contractor shall not enter the flow area of the Lafayette Creek flood control channel at any time. 4. Permittee shall comply with all requirements of the Contra Costa County Health Departments regarding COVID-19. 5. By accepting this permit, PERMITTEE agrees to pay all expenses of the DISTRICT related to this permit. A $20,000 cash deposit is required prior to the issuance of this permit. The DISTRICT/COUNTY reserves the right to use the cash bond to perform remedial work or to repair damage to the DISTRICT’s right of way or facilities caused by the PERMITTEE’s activities. By accepting this permit, PERMITTEE agrees that the DISTRICT can use the cash bond to pay for the balance of its permit expenses. 6. This permit will expire on July 15, 2024. Request for time extension shall be submitted in writing to the DISTRICT at least 1 week before the expiration date. 7. The DISTRICT staff assigned to this permit is Alexander Zandian, telephone – (925) 313-2052, email address – Alexander.Zandian@pw.cccounty.us. 8. The DISTRICT Inspector is Jon Suemnick, telephone – (925) 595-6010, email address – Jon.Suemnick@pw.cccounty.us. 9. PERMITTEE shall be responsible for scheduling a pre-construction meeting with the DISTRICT Inspector at least two weeks before the start of work. PERMITTEE shall submit a schedule of work to the DISTRICT Inspector before or during the pre-construction meeting. 10. PERMITTEE shall schedule an inspection with the DISTRICT Inspector within seven days of completion of all work/activities. 3 Encroachment Permit for Use of District Right of Way (Cont’d) Page 3 11. PERMITTEE shall notify and include the DISTRICT Maintenance Supervisor of the Public Works Maintenance Division in the final inspection of the completed work. Contact Matt Tolson, telephone (925) 313-7004, email address – Matt.Tolson@pw.cccounty.us. 12. The proposed work shall be in accordance with the civil plans entitled “3483 Golden Gate Way, Lafayette, CA” prepared by Kister, Savio & Rei, Inc. dated February 11, 2022 and the landscaping plans entitled “3483 Golden Gate Way, Lafayette, CA” prepared by Jett Landscape Architecture and Design dated February 11, 2022. The DISTRICT shall be allowed to review and accept proposed changes to the work located within the DISTRICT’s right of way before the changes are implemented. 14. By accepting this permit, PERMITTEE agrees to perform, at its sole expenses, all work necessary to correct any errors in the permitted design and construction, as directed by the DISTRICT. 15. PERMITTEE is solely responsible for obtaining any regulatory permits required for the proposed work. PERMITTEE shall submit to the DISTRICT copies of permits required by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other government agencies that have jurisdiction over the proposed work, or provide correspondence showing that the regulatory permits are not needed. 16. Before the start of work, PERMITTEE shall take photos or other visual records of the condition of all facilities such as gates, fences, flood control channels, structures, and other improvements that may be adversely impacted by PERMITTEE’s activities. The cost of this work shall be the PERMITTEE’s responsibility. The documents will be used to settle questions related to repair of damage to the facilities or improvements. PERMITTEE shall submit these pre-construction photos and/or video recording to the DISTRICT Inspector at or before the pre-construction meeting. 17. The required minimum relative compaction for native soil backfill within the DISTRICT’s right of way is 90% using the Caltrans Method. 18. Suitable soil backfill shall be placed in 4-inch to 6-inch maximum lift and the backfill lifts shall be compacted adequately as required by the DISTRICT Inspector. 19. All soil taken by the PERMITTEE from the DISTRICT’s property becomes the property of the PERMITTEE to be disposed of legally or used as the PERMITTEE sees fit. DISTRICT has not analyzed the quality or condition of the soil at the site and makes no representation whatsoever as to the quality or condition of the soil material. 20. PERMITTEE shall not store construction materials or park equipment and vehicles with the DISTRICT’s right of way. No refueling or maintenance of vehicles and equipment is permitted on the DISTRICT’s property. 21. PERMITTEE shall be responsible for keeping the DISTRICT’s right of way secure at all times. PERMITTEE shall install temporary fences or barriers, as necessary, to prohibit trespassing into the DISTRICT’s right of way. 4 Encroachment Permit for Use of District Right of Way (Cont’d) Page 4 22. PERMITTEE shall be solely responsible for determining the presence of underground utilities at the DISTRICT’s right of way. 23. PERMITTEE shall have a licensed engineer present during construction to oversee and monitor geotechnical work. Prior to sign off of the permit, the licensed engineer shall certify the work was constructed in accordance with the geotechnical report. 24. PERMITTEE shall install and maintain within their work area, silt fences or other forms of acceptable barriers to prevent soil or contaminants from entering drainage facilities. PERMITTEE’s erosion control measures shall not include products that contain mono- filament. 25. PERMITTEE shall submit to the DISTRICT Inspector an electronic copy of the as-built drawings, bearing the signature and seal of a licensed engineer, prior to the sign-off on this permit. As-built plans shall include a certification from the licensed engineer that the project was constructed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and geotechnical report, if applicable. 26. PERMITTEE shall dispose all trash/debris collected from the DISTRICT’s rights of way in a legal manner. 27. Prior to the sign off on the permit, PERMITTEE must enter into a Maintenance Agreement with DISTRICT for the continued maintenance of PERMITTEE’s constructed improvements and landscaping within the DISTRICT’s right of way. 5 Encroachment Permit for Use of District Right of Way (Cont’d) Page 5 Work performed under this permit shall not commence before February 1, 2023, and shall be completed by July 15, 2024. Failure to complete work by said date shall void this permit unless a written extension is granted by the District. FOR PERMITTEE: I hereby acknowledge that I have read this permit and agree to comply with all of the conditions stated herein and with all applicable Ordinances and Laws. For those areas involved herein to which the District does not hold fee title, I have also obtained permission from the underlying property owners. (Sign)____________________________________ Date_________________________ (Print)____________________________________ Title__________________________ FOR THE DISTRICT: Permission is Granted Brian M. Balbas, Ex-Officio Chief Engineer By_______________________________________ Date_________________________ *************************************************************************** Permit Fee / Deposit: Fee $1,900.00 (0649-9665) Receipt Number: G-1417867 Bond Required? Yes No Bond Type Cash Surety Bond Amount: Bond $20,000 (819800-0800) Receipt Number: G- Insurance Required? Yes No (The Minimum Limit for bodily injury and property damage is $1 million G.C.L.) 6 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Permit For Use Of District Right Of Way GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Definitions. a. "District" shall mean the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the grantor of this permit. b. "District's right of way" shall mean those areas involved herein on which District has land rights, whether those rights be held in fee, easement, license, permit from others, or any other form. c. "Permitted use", "planned installation", "permittee's facilities", "work covered herein" or other such phrases shall mean the specific work or purpose for which this permit is granted. 2. Scope of Permit. This permit is to be strictly construed and no work other than that specifically mentioned is authorized hereby. Incorporation herein of Permittee's plans does not constitute approval of items shown on said plans which lie outside the limits of District's right of way, nor of temporary alterations of District's flood control facilities (e.g. diversion dams, haul roads, cutting of banks or levees, sump holes) not shown on said plans which the Permittee or its contractor's may find necessary in order to construct or maintain the planned facilities. For any such alteration, Permittee or its contractor shall obtain District approval either by amendment to this permit or by separate permit. 3 No Precedent Established. It is understood and agreed by Permittee that approval of a particular action under a permit shall not establish a precedent for future similar requests by Permittee. 4. Granting of Rights to Others. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent District from granting rights to others within District's right of way concerned herein or using said right of way for any and all purposes, provided, however, that District shall not unreasonably prevent or obstruct Permittee's rights hereunder. 5. Permission of Underlying Owners and Holders of Prior Rights. Where District's title to the right of way concerned herein is anything less than fee, or where others are holders of prior rights within right of way held in fee by District which might be affected by Permittee's proposed use, the permission granted herein is valid only to the extent that District is legally able to grant such permission. Permittee shall also obtain permission for the proposed use of said right of way from said underlying owners or holders of prior rights. This permit shall not be effective until such permission is obtained. When specifically stated elsewhere herein, Permittee shall submit evidence of such permission to District. Failure of District to notify Permittee of the existence of such underlying owners and holders of prior rights shall not relieve Permittee of the responsibility of obtaining said separate permission. 7 General Provisions (Continued) 6. Non-Assignment. Permittee shall not assign, transfer or sublet this permit or any privileges herein granted except with the written consent of District. 7. Pending Easement. If so indicated elsewhere herein, negotiations are underway for the granting of an easement by District to Permittee for that portion of the work or facilities permitted herein which lie within lands owned in fee by District. District reserves the right to incorporate any or all of the conditions of this permit in said easement. Any conditions of this permit not so incorporated shall remain in full force and effect unless specifically revised or negated in the easement document or by written amendment to this permit. This permit shall not be construed as a release or waiver in any way of the right to compensation for such easement. 8. Future Relocation. If Permittee's facilities should at some time in the future interfere with District's maintenance, repair, reconstruction, alteration or expansion of its flood control facilities, or with installation of new facilities by the District, Permittee's facilities shall be removed, relocated, or modified to the satisfaction of District at the sole cost and expense of Permittee. 9. Revocability and Modification. This permit is revocable on five days notice, and is subject to modification by the District at any time. The listing of a specific expiration date elsewhere in this permit does not waive the right of the District to revoke this permit prior to that date as hereinabove provided. This permit may be revoked or suspended without prior notice if justifiable complaints of "nuisance" (e.g. dust, noise or invasion of privacy) are received from occupants or owners of nearby property. 10. Hold Harmless. Permittee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District of and from any and all claims including inverse condemnation, demands, damages, losses, actions, causes of action or judgments which District may pay or be required to pay by reason of any damages, injury or death to any person or property suffered by any person, firm or corporation as a result of the exercise by Permittee of the rights herein granted. 11. Insurance. If so stated elsewhere herein, this permit shall not be effective for any purpose unless and until Permittee files with District a certificate from his insurer stating that the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Contra Costa County has been named, for the purpose and duration of this permit, as an additional insured in his commercial general and automobile liability insurance policies to the minimum limits indicated. 12. Bond. If so stated elsewhere herein, this permit shall not be effective for any purpose unless and until Permittee files with District a bond in the form and amount indicated. 13. Expense of Inspection. Current fee schedule. 14. Notice Prior to Starting Work. Permittee shall notify District's Maintenance Division at least three working days in advance of starting the work covered herein or any new phase thereof. 8 General Provisions (Continued) 15. Non-Interference. Any work performed hereunder by Permittee or its authorized agents shall be done in such a manner as will at all times enable the District, its authorized agents or contractors, to use District's right of way. 16. Restoration of District's Facilities. Any District facilities removed or damaged during installation or maintenance of Permittee's facilities shall be replaced or repaired equivalent to, or better than their pre-existing condition at the sole cost and expense of the Permittee. If, upon being given reasonable notice by the District, the Permittee does not promptly make such restoration, the District reserves the right to perform the needed work and to bill the Permittee for the actual cost thereof. 17. As-Built Plans. Upon completion of underground or surface work of consequence, Permittee shall furnish to the District plans showing location and details unless pre-installation plans attached hereto sufficiently and accurately show such information. 18. Marking of Underground Facilities. Above-ground markers shall be placed by Permittee at locations satisfactory to District to indicate the line and depth of underground facilities installed under this permit. 19. District Non-Responsibility. Unless otherwise provided herein, District assumes no responsibility for the design, construction, maintenance or repair of Permittee's facilities and will not be responsible in any way for any damage to Permittee's facilities resulting from District's construction, reconstruction, alteration, operation and maintenance of District's facilities. 20. Maintenance. Unless otherwise provided herein, the Permittee agrees to exercise reasonable care to maintain properly any item installed under this permit and to exercise reasonable care in inspecting and immediately repairing and making good any injury to any portion of District's facilities which occurs as a result of the maintenance of such items in District's right of way or as a result of the work done under this permit, including any and all injury to District's facilities which would not have occurred had such work not been done or such item not been placed therein. Except in the case of emergency, Permittee shall consult District at least seven days in advance of commencement of any non-routine maintenance operations. 21. No Recourse Against District. The Permittee shall have no recourse whatsoever against the District for any loss, cost, expense, or damage arising out of any provisions or requirement of this permit because of its enforcement or for the termination or revocation of this permit as provided herein. Nor shall this permit be given any value before any court or public authority in any proceeding of any character. H:\Permits\ENCROACH\PMT-COND\651-21.docx Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) Exhibit A (Civil Plans) RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a maintenance agreement with 3483 Golden Gate Way, LLC (Developer), related to accepting maintenance responsibilities for a portion of Lafayette Creek, in Zone 3B, in the Lafayette area. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct fiscal impacts on the FC District funds. The proposed maintenance agreement does not add any additional maintenance responsibility to the FC District. The Developer is responsible for maintaining the proposed improvements covered under the proposed maintenance agreement. BACKGROUND: In 1955, the FC District accepted an easement and maintenance responsibilities for a section of the concrete channel known as Lafayette Creek, located on the Developer’s property, for flood control purposes. In 2021, the Developer applied for an FC District Encroachment Permit (FCP) 651-21 to construct a multifamily apartment complex with fences, landscaping, a APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Cordis, 925-313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 7 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Creek Maintenance Agreement with 3483 Golden Gate Way, LLC. Project No. EF2100651 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) storm drain outfall, and other appurtenant improvements within the FC District’s easement. As a condition of the FCP, the Developer and FC District agreed to clarify each entity’s maintenance responsibilities in the form of a maintenance agreement. Staff recommends approving the maintenance agreement to formalize the maintenance responsibilities of the FC District and the Developer within the easement area. This action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and a Notice of Exemption was posted on February 15, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Creek Maintenance Agreement with the Developer is not approved, the Developer will be unable to construct and adequately drain their proposed multifamily apartment complex and associated improvements. ATTACHMENTS Maintenance Agreement with 3483 Golden Gate Way LLC Notarized Exhibit A Civil Plans Exhibit B FCP 651-21 Exhibit C Easements CEQA RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with KJELDSEN, SINNOCK & NEUDECK, INC., effective February 7, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $620,000 to a new payment limit of $3,013,020 for construction management and biological monitoring services, with no change to the term, Martinez area. FISCAL IMPACT: This project, including the Contract Amendment, will be funded by 100% Flood Control Zone 3B Funds. BACKGROUND: The FC District provides regional flood protection, technical information, hydrology data, and education to cities and residents, and environmental stewardship for over 70 miles of streams and several detention basins, as part of the County’s flood protection system. The FC District is increasing the payment limit of its contract for construction management and biological monitoring services to continue ongoing work related to the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, which will improve native habitat and provide sustainable flood protection near the mouth of Walnut Creek on the southern shore of Suisun Bay. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Detjens, (925) 313-2394 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Michael Taylor, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 8 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment with KJELDSEN, SINNOCK & NEUDECK, INC., Martinez area. (Project No. 7520-6B8285) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the approval of the Board of Supervisors, the FC District will not be able to continue services for construction management and biological monitoring services on work related to the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE supplemental public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final in 2022, through January 3, 2023, as recommended by the Chief Assistant County Counsel. FISCAL IMPACT: Settlement amounts are listed below. BACKGROUND: This report supplements litigation settlement reports that were received by the Board of Supervisors on March 8, 2022; August 2, 2022; September 13, 2022; October 11, 2022; and November 29, 2022. In addition to the settlement agreements reported on those dates, four agreements to settle pending litigation, as defined in Government Code section 54956.9, became final in 2022, through January 3, 2023. Cynthia Slezak v. County of Contra Costa, et al. CCC Sup. Ct. Case No. C17-02454. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved a settlement in this inverse condemnation lawsuit involving water damage to the plaintiff’s property. The Board authorized settlement in the amount of $70,000, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, in closed session by a 4-0 vote, Supervisor Andersen abstained. The funding source is the Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund. The settlement agreement was fully executed on February 10, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, Karen Caoile, Risk Manager C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Supplemental public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final in 2022, through January 3, 2023 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Clarence Frazier v. Contra Costa County, et al., USDC Case No. 21-cv-2204 (N.D. Cal.). On February 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved by a vote of 5-0 a settlement in this civil rights claim involving a medical condition. The Board authorized settlement in the amount of $300,000, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, in closed session by a 5-0 vote. The funding source is the Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund. The settlement agreement was fully executed on February 24, 2022. Jim Lynn Bennefield v. Patrick Mazerski, et al., Yolo Co. Sup. Ct. Case No. CV2021-0425. On October 11, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved a settlement in this personal injury claim arising out of an automobile accident involving a Sheriff’s Office vehicle. The Board authorized settlement in the amount of $167,500, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, in closed session by a 5-0 vote. The funding source is the Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund. The settlement agreement was fully executed on October 25, 2022. In re Orbisonia Heights/Ambrose Village project. On November 29, 2022, the Board of Supervisors authorized a settlement of pending California Environmental Quality Act litigation related to the Board’s approval of agreements for the development of the Orbisonia Heights/Ambrose Village project in Bay Point. The Board authorized settlement in closed session by a 5-0 vote. The agreement among Discovery Builders, Inc.; Sierra Pacific Properties, Inc.; Pacific West Communities, Inc.; and the County requires County staff to recommend certain future conditions of approval but does not involve any County payments. The settlement agreement was fully executed on January 3, 2023. This report includes final settlements of litigation matters handled by the Office of the County Counsel. This report does not include litigation settlements that were reported by the Risk Management Division of the County Administrator’s Office as a consent item on the Board’s open session agenda. RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility, Sprint Communications Company LP, and Sprint Spectrum LP in the total amount of $1,261,117.75, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2019/20. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: T-Mobile West LLC, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility, Sprint Communications Company LP, and Sprint Spectrum LP (“Claimants”) have filed claims for refund of property taxes against the County and a number of other counties, essentially alleging that the statutory formula used to calculate their property tax rate violates the California Constitution. In December 2022, T-Mobile West LLC submitted a claim to the County in the amount of $244,654.53. In January 2023, CenturyLink Communications LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $33,656.00; AT&T Corp submitted a claim in the amount of $45,544.00; AT&T Mobility LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $737,569.00; Sprint Communications LP submitted a claim in the amount of $10,751.46; and Sprint Spectrum LP submitted a claim in the amount of $188,942.76. [The claims are provided in Attachments A-F.] The claims, in the collective amount of $1,261,117.75, are for property taxes paid for tax year 2019/2020. Claimants request interest on the requested refund amounts. The County has received refund claims for prior years based on the same allegation, which the County has denied. Other counties that have received similar refund claims appear to have uniformly denied the claims. Santa Clara County recently prevailed before the Court of Appeal on the basis that the statutory tax rate imposed on property owned by these entities do not violate the California Constitution. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Deny claims filed for unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2019/20 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) ANALYSIS: Under the California Constitution, certain property owned or used by utilities and telecommunication companies, among others, is annually assessed by the State Board of Equalization ("BOE"). (Cal. Const., article XIII, § 19.) The amount of such "unitary property" assessments attributed to the County by the BOE are then taxed by the County in accordance with a statutory formula. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100.) The Auditor-Controller uses the amount of unitary property assessments annually provided by the BOE to calculate the amount of taxes to be levied on these properties in accordance with a formula mandated by state law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100). Based on this formula, the unitary tax rate for 2019/20 was 1.6865%. The Auditor-Controller has confirmed that the rate was correctly calculated pursuant to the State law, and the Office of the State Controller has deemed it correct. Claimants argue that they are entitled to a partial refund of taxes on the grounds that they were illegally levied because the formula used to calculate the rate is unconstitutional. However, the County is given no discretion on its calculation of the unitary tax rate; it is a mandated formula set by the State. A recent decision from the California Court of Appeals has affirmed the constitutionality of the rate. (County of Santa Clara v. Sup. Ct. (Jan. 6, 2023, No. H049161) ___Cal.App.5th___.) For these reasons, the claims should be denied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to take the recommended action would result in interest continuing to accrue on a potential court-ordered refund of property taxes. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Claim of T-Mobile West LLC Attachment B - Claim of CenturyLink Communications LLC Attachment C - Claim of AT&T Corp. Attachment D - Claim of AT&T Mobility LLC Attachment E - Claim of Sprint Communications Company LP Attachment F - Claim of Sprint Spectrum LP RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp, and AT&T Mobility LLC in the total amount of $1,453,842.45, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2020/21. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, CenturyLink Communications LLC, AT&T Corp, and AT&T Mobility LLC (collectively, “Claimants”) have filed claims for refund of property taxes against the County and a number of other counties, essentially alleging that the statutory formula used to calculate their property tax rate violates the California Constitution. In December 2022, T-Mobile West LLC submitted a claim to the County in the amount of $311,704.04. In January 2023, Sprint Communications Company, LP submitted a claim in the amount of $12,871.18; CenturyLink Communications LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $41,583.23; AT&T Corp submitted a claim in the amount of $60,286.00; and AT&T Mobility LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $1,027,398.00 [The claims are provided in Attachments A-E.] The claims, in the collective amount of $1,453,842.45, are for property taxes paid for tax year 2020/21. Claimants request interest on the requested refund amounts. Some of these claimants have submitted refund claims for prior years based on the same allegation, which the County has denied. Other counties that have received similar refund claims from these claimants appear to have uniformly denied the claims. Santa Clara County recently prevailed before the Court of Appeal on the basis that the statutory tax rate imposed on property owned by these entities does not violate the California Constitution. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Deny claims filed for unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2020/21 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) ANALYSIS: Under the California Constitution, certain property owned or used by utilities and telecommunication companies, among others, is annually assessed by the State Board of Equalization ("BOE"). (Cal. Const., article XIII, § 19.) The amount of such "unitary property" assessments attributed to the County by the BOE are then taxed by the County in accordance with a statutory formula. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100.) The Auditor-Controller uses the amount of unitary property assessments annually provided by the BOE to calculate the amount of taxes to be levied on these properties in accordance with a formula mandated by state law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100). Based on this formula, the unitary tax rate for 2020/21 is 1.8320%. The Auditor-Controller has confirmed that the rate was correctly calculated pursuant to the State law, and the Office of the State Controller has deemed it correct. Claimants argue that they are entitled to a partial refund of taxes on the grounds that they were illegally levied because the formula used to calculate the rate is unconstitutional. However, the County is given no discretion on its calculation of the unitary tax rate; it is a mandated formula set by the State. A recent decision from the California Court of Appeals has affirmed the constitutionality of the rate. (County of Santa Clara v. Sup. Ct. (Jan. 6, 2023, No. H049161) ___Cal.App.5th___.) For these reasons, the claims should be denied CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to take the recommended action would result in interest continuing to accrue on a potential court-ordered refund of property taxes. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Claim of T-Mobile West LLC Attachment B - Claim of Sprint Communications Company LP Attachment C - Claim of CenturyLink Communications LLC Attachment D - Claim of AT&T Corp Attachment E - Claim of AT&T Mobility LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY the claims filed by T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum LP, and CenturyLink Communications LLC in the total amount of $496,899.02, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2021/22. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: T-Mobile West LLC, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum LP and CenturyLink Communications LLC (collectively, “Claimants”) have filed claims for refund of property taxes against the County and a number of other counties, essentially alleging that the statutory formula used to calculate their property tax rate violates the California Constitution. In December 2022, T-Mobile West LLC submitted a claim to the County in the amount of $360,642.03. In January 2023, Sprint Communications Company, LP submitted a claim in the amount of $19,180.64, Sprint Spectrum LP submitted a claim in the amount of $79,250.06, and CenturyLink Communications LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $37,826.29. [The claims are provided in Attachments A-D.] The claims, in the collective amount of $496,899.02, are for property taxes paid for tax year 2021/22. Claimants request interest on the requested refund amounts. Some of these claimants have submitted refund claims for prior years based on the same allegation, which the County has denied. Other counties that have received similar refund claims from these claimants appear to have uniformly denied the claims. Santa Clara County recently prevailed before the Court of Appeal on the basis that the statutory tax rate imposed on property owned by these entities does not violate the California Constitution. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Deny claims filed for unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2021/22 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) ANALYSIS: Under the California Constitution, certain property owned or used by utilities and telecommunication companies, among others, is annually assessed by the State Board of Equalization ("BOE"). (Cal. Const., article XIII, § 19.) The amount of such "unitary property" assessments attributed to the County by the BOE are then taxed by the County in accordance with a statutory formula. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100.) The Auditor-Controller uses the amount of unitary property assessments annually provided by the BOE to calculate the amount of taxes to be levied on these properties in accordance with a formula mandated by state law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100). Based on this formula, the unitary tax rate for 2021/22 is 1.8168%. The Auditor-Controller has confirmed that the rate was correctly calculated pursuant to the State law, and the Office of the State Controller has deemed it correct. Claimants argue that they are entitled to a partial refund of taxes on the grounds that they were illegally levied because the formula used to calculate the rate is unconstitutional. However, the County is given no discretion on its calculation of the unitary tax rate; it is a mandated formula set by the State. A recent decision from the California Court of Appeals has affirmed the constitutionality of the rate. (County of Santa Clara v. Sup. Ct. (Jan. 6, 2023, No. H049161) ___Cal.App.5th___.) For these reasons, the claims should be denied. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Claim of T-Mobile West LLC Attachment B - Claim of Sprint Communications Company LP Attachment C - Claim of Sprint Spectrum LP Attachment D - CenturyLink Communication LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY the claims filed by Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Pacific Bell, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile West LLC, and CenturyLink Communications LLC in the total amount of $1,511,730.83, plus interest, in unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2022/23. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Communications Company, LP, Pacific Bell, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile West LLC, and CenturyLink Communications LLC (collectively, “Claimants”) have filed claims for refund of property taxes against the County and a number of other counties, essentially alleging that the statutory formula used to calculate their property tax rate violates the California Constitution. In January 2023, Sprint Spectrum, LP submitted a claim to the County in the amount of $16,460.68; Sprint Communications Company, LP submitted a claim in the amount of $14,212.20; Pacific Bell submitted a claim in the amount of $689,464.00; AT&T Corp. submitted a claim in the amount of $72,202.00; AT&T Mobility LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $435,276.00; T-Mobile West LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $245,440.47; and CenturyLink Communications LLC submitted a claim in the amount of $38,675.48. [The claims are provided in Attachments A-G.] The claims, in the collective amount of $1,511,730.83, are for the first installment of property taxes paid for tax year 2022/2023. Claimants request interest on the requested refund amounts. Some of these claimants have submitted refund claims for prior years based on the same allegation, which the County has denied. Other counties that have received similar refund claims from these claimants appear to have uniformly denied the claims. Santa Clara County recently prevailed before the Court of Appeal on the basis that the statutory tax rate imposed on property owned by these entities does not violate the California Constitution. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Deny claims filed for unitary property taxes paid for tax year 2022/23 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) ANALYSIS: Under the California Constitution, certain property owned or used by utilities and telecommunication companies, among others, is annually assessed by the State Board of Equalization ("BOE"). (Cal. Const., article XIII, § 19.) The amount of such "unitary property" assessments attributed to the County by the BOE are then taxed by the County in accordance with a statutory formula. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100.) The Auditor-Controller uses the amount of unitary property assessments annually provided by the BOE to calculate the amount of taxes to be levied on these properties in accordance with a formula mandated by state law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 100). Based on this formula, the unitary tax rate for 2022/23 is 1.8499%. The Auditor-Controller has confirmed that the rate was correctly calculated pursuant to the State law, and the Office of the State Controller has deemed it correct. Claimants argue that they are entitled to a partial refund of taxes on the grounds that they were illegally levied because the formula used to calculate the rate is unconstitutional. However, the County is given no discretion on its calculation of the unitary tax rate; it is a mandated formula set by the State. A recent decision from the California Court of Appeals has affirmed the constitutionality of the rate. (County of Santa Clara v. Sup. Ct. (Jan. 6, 2023, No. H049161) ___Cal.App.5th___.) The refund requests are also premature. Claimants have only paid a portion of the property taxes for 2022-23. Tax disputes must be resolved after the taxes at issue have been paid. (See Flying Dutchman Park, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1129, 1139.) For these reasons, the claims should be denied. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Claim of Sprint Spectrum LP Attachment B - Claim of Sprint Communications Company LP Attachment C - Claim of Pacific Bell Attachment D - Claim of AT&T Corp. Attachment E - Claim of AT&T Mobility LLC Attachment F - Claim of T-Mobile West LLC Attachment G - Claim of CenturyLink Communications LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY the claim for refund of property taxes filed by Chung Jin Park for fiscal years 2017/18 through 2022/23. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On January 3, 2023, Claimant Chung Jin Park filed a claim with the Clerk of the Board seeking a refund of property taxes paid from 2018 to the present in the amount of $12,217.02. The claim appears to relate to a property that Claimant purchased in February 2017 in Lafayette, Assessor’s Parcel No. 248-120-010-9 (the “Property”). Claimant maintains that his property has been overvalued by the Assessor’s Office because the Property cannot be built on or otherwise put to use due to the steep terrain and a scenic easement on the property. He further states that he has annual costs related “to mow[ing] dry weeds to prevent fires.” To receive a property tax refund based on a challenge to the assessed value of a property, a taxpayer must first seek to have the property value equalized before the Assessment Appeals Board. If the Assessment Appeals Board lowers the assessed value of a property, the taxpayer may then seek a refund of property taxes paid. (See APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Vince Robb, Assessor's Office C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Deny the claim for refund of property taxes filed by Chung Jin Park BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1298, 1308.) Claimant has not received a reduced assessed value for the years at issue from the Assessment Appeals Board. Additionally, to the extent that Claimant seeks a property tax refund of payments that he made before January 3, 2019, the claim is untimely. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 5097(a).) For these reasons, there is no basis to grant Claimant’s claim for a tax refund. The claim has also been processed as a claim under the Government Claims Act. The claim was denied under the Government Claims Act on January 3, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to take the recommended action would result in the interest continuing to accrue on a potential court-ordered refund of property taxes. ATTACHMENTS Claim of Chung Jin Park (Redacted) RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, Ashkan Ghafouri, Pei-Yu Hu, Charles H. Joe, Dianne Liebert, Pacific Bell, Chung Jin Park, Thelma Perez, Katrina Rasters, Sprint Communication, Co., LP, Sprint Spectrum LP, T-Mobile West LLC, and Eliana Serrano & Hilel Vargas. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: AT&T Corporation: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $26,732. AT&T Mobility LLC: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $435,276. Ashkan Ghafouri: Property claim for damage to fence in the amount of $14,600. Pei-Yu Hu: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $353.83. Charles H. Joe: Property damage to vehicle in an undisclosed amount. Dianne Liebert: Property damage to vehicle in the amount of $340.37. Pacific Bell: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $689,464. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Risk Management I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:claims BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Chung Jin Park: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $12,217.02. Thelma Perez: Personal injury claim resulting from vehicle accident in an amount to be determined. Katrina Rasters: Medical malpractice claim related to anesthesia in the amount of $50,000,000. Sprint Communication Company, LP: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $14,212.20. Sprint Spectrum LP: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $16,460.68. T-Mobile West LLC: Claim for refund of property tax in the amount of $245,440.47. Eliana Serrano & Hilel Vargas: Medical malpractice claim for wrongful death and personal injury in an amount to be determined. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Not acting on the claims could extend the claimants' time limits to file actions against the County. In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/19 IN THE MATTER OF recognizing Allison Knapp on her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County. WHEREAS Allison Knapp first came to Contra Costa County as an Engineering Summer Intern in 1993 and worked in the Transportation Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and; Whereas Allison returned and officially began her career with Contra Costa County in 1997 as an Entry Level Engineer for the Public Works Department in the Design Division then moved to the Construction Division in 1999 and; WHEREAS in 2000 Allison was promoted to Associate Civil Engineer and rotated to the Flood Control Division and; WHEREAS in 2004 Allison rotated to the Maintenance Division as an Associate Civil Engineer and; WHEREAS in 2005 Allison was recognized for her contribution to completion of the Rossmoor Detention Basin Expansion project. The Team received a thank you letter from then District II Supervisor Uilkema for the support her office and the residents of Rossmoor received throughout the design, build and landscape of the project. From start to finish this project was completed in short time and was greatly appreciated by everyone and; WHEREAS in 2005 Allison was part of the Vasco Road Delineator project team nominated for the J. Michael Walford Team Project of the Year Award for the planning, coordination and teamwork to install over 13 miles of delineators in one day and; WHEREAS in 2006 Allison was recognized for her contribution to the repair of the Marsh Creek Detention Facility Bridge and; WHEREAS in 2007 Allison was promoted to Senior Civil Engineer while working in the Maintenance Division and; WHEREAS in 2014 Allison was promoted to Supervisor Civil Engineer while working in the Maintenance Division and; WHEREAS in 2019 Allison was promoted to Deputy Public Works Director and; WHEREAS Allison works tirelessly to promote a positive, fun work environment for the Public Works Department taking the lead or assisting in Public Works Employee Association activities such as BBQ’s and holiday celebrations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Allison Knapp be recognized for 25 years of service to Contra Costa County and for the high quality of work performed by her during her career. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brian M. Balbas, 925-313-2000 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing Allison Knapp for her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2023/19 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/19 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/26 In support of human rights in Iran, including immediate cessation of Human Rights abuses on the Demonstrators in Iran and the immediate release of Political Prisoners and a Free Secular Democratic Republic of Iran. Women in Iran, mothers, sisters and daughters, are systematically subject to an apartheid state with much harsher restrictions than men; and Whereas, Many individuals have been imprisoned, tortured and executed for being defenders of human rights by the Islamic Republic of Iran; and Whereas, Women in Iran continue to face laws that restrict rights over their bodies and the ability to think for themselves, and denied the same opportunities as men in relation to marriage, divorce, child custody, inheritance, and travel; and Whereas, Protests erupted across Iran after Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Iranian Kurdish woman, was pronounced dead on September 16, 2022, she fell into a coma shortly after she was detained by the morality police for allegedly not complying with the regime’s strict hijab rules in Tehran on September 13, 2022; and Whereas, Ms. Nasrin Sotoudeh, a renowned civil rights lawyer and advocate for human rights, including rights of women, minorities, and youth despite systemic oppression in her home country of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is currently serving a 38-year prison sentence with 148 lashes; and Whereas, The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors stands together in its’ support of human rights in Iran, including equal rights for women, the LGBTQIA community and minorities, and the end of apartheid against women and targeted religious, nonreligious and cultural minorities. that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby condemn human rights abuses against the Iranian people, and ask for a free, secular, democratic republic of Iran where everyone can live freely and prosper regardless of their gender, sexual orientation, beliefs and religion. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 9256552300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:In support of human rights in Iran, including immediate cessation of Human Rights abuses on the Demonstrators in Iran and the immediate release of Pol CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Nazie Shakerin, Parandia Banifatemi from the Iranian American Community of Contra Costa; Jale, Berkeley; Bajan Sartipi; Nazanin Shekerin. Written commentary provided by Xuezhn Zhau; Zaria Saniee; Autreen Golzar; Fareshteh Mofidi; Dorie Ofojh;Avideh J. Sharifi; Reza Jannatpour; Reza Golzar; Venous Jafari; Faran Dadafanin; Jannaz Sharifi; Ladan Elahi; Mimi Hakani; Losat Bowlati; Elhan Senemar; Fariba Esmarli; Roshanak Rahimi; Goity; Azara Ansari; Mehri Deghan; Shideh Jashayod; Farhad Shokouh; Kiana Shokouh; Nazanin Shakerin; Peyman Moshrofi (attached). AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/26 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/26 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/32 Honoring Shawn Coffman Upon The Occasion of 20 Years of Service to Contra Costa Animal Services. WHEREAS, Shawn Coffman began her career with Contra Costa County as an Animal Services Technician for Contra Costa Animal Services on October 14, 2002. Ms. Shawn Coffman then advanced to a Senior Animal Center Technician on June 7, 2007, then advanced to Animal Center Operations Supervisor on July 1, 2017 where she currently remains today; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa Animal Services staff celebrate Ms. Shawn Coffman’s contributions to performing her duties in accordance with the values of her department’s mission through her dedicated work performance and outstanding work ethic; and WHEREAS, Ms. Shawn Coffman has served in the shelter division in numerous capacities by improving the department’s operations and service capacity; and WHEREAS, Ms. Shawn Coffman is a valued resource, dedicated staff member and model employee for the Contra Costa Animal Services Department. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors congratulate and thank Ms. Shawn Coffman for her 20 years of dedicated service. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/32 in honor of Contra Costa Animal Services Shelter Supervisor Shawn Coffman for her 20+ years of service. FISCAL IMPACT: none. BACKGROUND: none. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: none. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: none. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kara Galindo, 925-608-8413 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Honoring Shawn Coffman Upon the Occasion of 20 Years of Service to Contra Costa Animal Services AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/32 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/32 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/40 declaring February 12-18, 2023 as African American Mental Health Awareness Week, February 15th as Miles Hall Day of Remembrance and March 8th as Tyrell Wilson Day of Remembrance WHEREAS, in the African American community, there is a need to support the recovery process of peers/clients/consumers and family members impacted by mental health and substance use issues through the delivery of well-funded, culturally-responsive, community-defined and honoring services, including but not limited to, the incorporation of identified spiritual/faith practices and beliefs when requested; and WHEREAS, mental health and substance use issues and the devastating impact of COVID-19 are among the leading causes of health challenges for African Americans in this County; and WHEREAS, scientific studies show that when the services are delivered by individuals reflective of those served and faith/spiritual practices are included and embraced as a part of the recovery plan, the peer/client/consumer along with the behavioral health system experiences shorter recovery times, fewer relapses, and fewer hospitalizations; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Behavioral Health and Provider Services, in an effort to better reflect and celebrate the diverse populations of the county, has been one of the pioneering counties to heed the voice of the peer/client/consumer and family members in building collaborations with various faith based/spiritual communities to explore all resources and tools that will enhance mental health wellness in the African American Community; and WHEREAS, NAMI Contra Costa, it’s African American Uplift Program, peers/clients/consumers, family members, providers, spiritual leaders, Conscious Contra Costa, and The Miles Hall Foundation are working hard to support and protect families by educating communities about mental illness and by protecting those living with mental illness from unjust practices and harm by supporting the Miles Hall Crisis Line and the A3 24 hours-7 days a week non police response program, and WHEREAS, all interested stakeholders can participate in the February 16th Mental Health Awareness Black History Virtual Event providing an update for the African American Uplift Program, the Miles Hall Foundation Bicycle Give-away and ongoing efforts to replace misinformation about mental health, erase prejudice, fear and blame thereby reducing stigma and disparities to unserved, underserved and inappropriately-served communities by helping restore mental health wellness, and reimagining safety for ALL in Contra Costa County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors proclaims February 12-18, 2023 as acknowledgement of African American Mental Health Awareness Week and February 15, 2023 as the Miles Hall Day of Remembrance, March 8th as Tyrell Wilson Day of Remembrance and encourages everyone to participate. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sonia Bustamante 510-409-3004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:African American Mental Health Awareness Week, Miles Hall Day of Remembrance, Tyrell Wilson Day of Remembrance AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/40 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/40 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/43 recognizing Lunar New Year Celebrations in Contra Costa County WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill 2596, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 29, 2022, declared Lunar New Year an official holiday in California. From the months of January to March, an estimated 2 billion people around the world welcome the new year through unique cultural celebrations in alignment with the lunar calendar. In this nation, millions of members of the Asian American diaspora originating from (but not limited to) the Philippines, Vietnam, China, Tibet, Mongolia and Korea, continue to celebrate these customs here in this nation; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa’s Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) communities total close to 19 percent of the entire population – this winter, many households and communities across Contra Costa will engage in celebrations and traditions passed down through thousands of years of history with modern additions; and WHEREAS, across the world there are similar and shared Lunar New Year traditions and practices between groups influenced by the dominant culture of China. For example, Chinese Lunar New Year is known as Spring Festival or Chunjié, the Korean New Year is Seollal, Vietnamese New Year is T?t, Mongolian New Year is Tsagaan Sar, etc. Common practices include an animal corresponding with the calendar year, food, drinks, altars and offerings for ancestor worship, gifts of “lucky money” in red envelopes, visits to temples and pagodas, firecrackers, fireworks displays, dances, songs, etc.; and WHEREAS, the year 2023 is the year of the Rabbit for those following the traditional Chinese calendar and is the year of the Cat for those observing Vietnamese New Year (T?t) and the traditional Vietnamese calendar; and WHEREAS, it is established that the AANHPI community and Lunar New Year observers are multi-ethnic and multi-racial, and Lunar New Year is celebrated by friends and families of all identities; and WHEREAS, the AANHPI community is not a monolith, and we celebrate its diversity while simultaneously honoring the unique differences; and WHEREAS, by observing Lunar New Year, we honor and stand with pride alongside our Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander community , a community for everyone to celebrate without shame or fear of exclusion and violence based on food, features, language and customs; and WHEREAS, these traditions are relevant and important to the well-being of AANHPI communities as many preserve these traditions in order to preserve the home they left in exchange for this United States of America; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is committed to partnerships with community leaders organizing and creating solidarity among AANHPI groups and other BIPOC communities; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County condemns any racialized or hate driven violence targeting ethnic groups such as our AANHPI community. Since the COVID pandemic began, incidences of open anti-Asian hate have increased drastically across our nation, along with acts of violence, shootings and murders. Despite these acts of violence, the AANHPI community has proven strong and determined; and WHEREAS, the 2023 Contra Costa Lunar New Year celebration is a celebration of life, inviting renewal, prosperity, and release from difficult pasts in exchange for a future of love, acceptance, happiness, and joy; and The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, do hereby proclaim this day February 7th, 2023, as “Lunar New Year Celebration of the year 2023” and are dedicated to creating an inclusive Contra Costa where all AANHPI can authentically thrive and prosper through substantive actions and equitable policies, procedures, and practices protecting the wellbeing of AANHPI community members. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy WHEREAS, the year 2023 reaffirms Contra Costa County’s commitment to creating a county where everyone is included and empowered to express the fullest extent of their joy; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is committed to creating a county in which AANHPI can walk confidently in themselves, their families, names, customs, and cultures; and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sonia Bustamante 510-409-3004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing Lunar New Year Contra Costa CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speaker: No Name Given. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/43 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/43 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/47 proclaiming February 2023 as Civil Grand Jury Awareness Month in Contra Costa County. WHEREAS, civil grand juries are crucial components of California's judicial system, serving an important role: investigating and reporting on the operations of local government (which is known as the "watchdog " function -- a civil, rather than criminal function) and investigating allegations of a public official’s corrupt or willful misconduct in office, and when warranted, filing an "accusation" against that official to remove him or her from office; and WHEREAS, every county in California has a civil grand jury made up of citizens, appointed by the county's Superior Court, who dedicate their time for a full year to grand jury service; and WHEREAS, thanks to their commitment and hard work, civil grand jurors help ensure that local governments, such as counties, cities, special districts, and school districts, are operating legally and efficiently; WHEREAS, thanks to their commitment and hard work, civil grand jurors help ensure that local governments, such as counties, cities, special districts, and school districts, are operating legally and efficiently; Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved that the Board of Supervisors hereby proclaims February 2023 as Civil Grand Jury Awareness Month in Contra Costa County, recognizing the contributions of the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury and encouraging citizens to apply for grand jury service by contacting the Contra Costa County Superior Court or accessing the Civil Grand Jury's website. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: County Administration I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:February 2023 Civil Grand Jury Awareness Month AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/47 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/47 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2023/49 In the Matter of Recognizing Monument Crisis Center for its 20 years of service to our community WHEREAS, Monument Crisis Center opened its doors on August 19, 2003 as a food pantry with start-up funding from the Safeway Foundation, Salvation Army, Soroptimist International of Pleasant Hill as well as several individual donors; and      WHEREAS, Monument Crisis Center initially worked out of one single office and food “closet” and served 84 families on the first day of food distribution in the Monument Corridor; and      WHEREAS, today, Monument Crisis Center, with a staff of 13 people, serves over 5,000 residents a month and has a facility that is multiple stories; and      WHEREAS, not only does Monument Crisis Center still have the food pantry, but they have several other programs as well including Senior Moments, After School Café, Summer and   Holiday Food Box Drives, Annual Backpack Drive; and      WHEREAS, Monument Crisis Center seeks to offer nutritious food, quality resources, and referrals to low-income individuals and families in order to help them become stable and secure in our community; and      WHEREAS, After School Café is a tutoring program held throughout the school year where high school students help to tutor the neighborhood children. Not only do the younger students   learn and improve in school, but high school students learn responsibility and accountability; and       WHEREAS, in 2020, the needs in the community skyrocketed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and Monument Crisis Center stepped up to the challenge and got back to basics by focusing   on the food pantry program; and      WHEREAS, during the pandemic, Monument Crisis Center averaged 171.1 households per day, spiking to an average of 298.2 households per day in April 2020; and      WHEREAS, the health of clients is extremely important to Monument Crisis Center. They have partnered with Contra Costa Health Services to provide flu vaccines and partnered with La   Clinica De La Raza to provide COVID-19 vaccine clinics to the community during some of the food distributions to provide a one-stop-shop of resources; and      WHEREAS, over the last 20 years, Monument Crisis Center has changed lives, including their staff, all the staff started as volunteers or interns and 100% are from the low-income or immigrant communities that Monument Crisis Center continues to serve today.           Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors does hereby honor Monument Crisis Center on its 20th anniversary. Now be it further resolved  that the Board of Supervisors applauds Monument Crisis Center’s dedication to helping those with the highest need and for continually providing new services to meet the evolving needs of our community.   ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor   ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor   ______________________________________ KEN CARLSON FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor   I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken  and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date  shown.   ATTESTED:    February  7, 2023    Monica Nino, County Administrator   By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad 655*2350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ken Carlson Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:In the Matter of Recognizing Monument Crisis Center for its 20 years of service to our community AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/49 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/49 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE the 2022-23 report of the Auditor-Controller that contains the property tax-related costs of the Assessor, Tax Collector, Auditor and Assessment Appeals Board for the 2021-22 fiscal year, as required by Resolution No. 97/129; 2. FIX February 28, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the determination of property tax administrative costs; 3. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to notify affected local jurisdictions of the public hearing; and 4. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to prepare and publish the required legal notice and make supporting documentation available for public inspection. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The report details the property tax-related costs of the County in fiscal year 2021-2022 in order to determine the amount of cost recovery in fiscal year 2022-2023. The determination of the property tax administrative costs will occur at the hearing on February 28, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Strobel (925) 655-2058 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Property Tax Administrative Cost Recovery BACKGROUND: In 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 97/129 which provides procedures for property tax administrative cost recovery. The recommended actions are necessary for implementation of Resolution No. 97/129 for the current fiscal year. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the hearing is not set to consider and adopt the finding of property tax costs, the costs cannot be recovered, resulting in a loss of General Fund revenue in the current fiscal year. ATTACHMENTS FY 2022-23 Property Tax Administrative Cost Recovery Report RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Marilyn Cachola Lucey, resident of Alamo, to the District II Seat of the Contra Costa Commission for Women for a four-year term with an expiration date of February 28, 2027, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE BACKGROUND: The Commission for Women was established to identify major economic, educational, and social concerns of women in Contra Costa County, and to reach and inform all women on a variety of issues. The Commission consists of 16 members: one member from each Supervisorial District, 10 At Large members, and 1 Alternate At Large member. The IO Committee reviews nominations to the 10 At Large and Alternate Seats. Terms for all Commission seats are four years. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat will become vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NONE APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-655-2300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, CC Commission for Women and Girls, Appointee C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINTMENT TO THE CONTRA COSTA COMMISSION FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Skyelar Cribbs to the District 3, Seat 2 on the Mental Health Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2025, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Mental Health Commission was created in 1993. Their mission is to review and evaluate the community's mental health needs, services, facilities, and special problems; to advise the governing body and local mental health director as to any aspect of the local mental health program; review the County's performance outcome data and communicate its findings to the State Mental Health Commission; and asses the impact of the realignment of services from State to County on services delivered to clients and the local community and report findings and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The District 3, Seat 2 has been vacant since July 2020. Applications were accepted and the recommendation to appoint the above individual was determined. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: This District 3, Seat 2 would remain vacant. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINTMENT TO THE MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Bob Mankin to the Appointee 2 seat on the Discovery Bay P-6 Citizen Advisory Committee to a term expiring December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Appointee 2 seat expired on December 31, 2022, recommendation of reappointment was made. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Appointee 2 seat would remain open. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:REAPPOINTMENT TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 Contra Costa County NOTICE C.27 The Board of Supervisors will make appointments to fill existing advisory body vacancies. Interested citizens may submit written applications for vacancies to the following address: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1025 Escobar Street, 1st Floor Martinez, CA 9455 Board , Commission , or Committee Measure X Community Advisory Board Seat: District 3, Seat 2 A ppointments will be made after February 21, 2023 I, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator, hereby certify that, in accordance with Section 54974 of the Government Code, the above notice of vacancy (vacancies) will be posted on February 7, 2023. cc : Hard Copy to Clerk of the Board Lobby Hard Copy to Minutes File Soft Copy .DOCX to M :\5-Notices and Postings Soft Copy .PDF to S:\Minutes Attachments\Minutes 2020 Soft Copy .PDF to M:\1-Committee Files and Applications I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. Attested: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors And ~= By : ~ /::1µgjL Deputy Clerk RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the District 3, Seat 2 on the Measure X Community Advisory Board previously held by David Cruise and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Measure X Community Advisory Board was established by the Board of Supervisors on February 2, 2021 to advise the Board of Supervisors on the use of Measure X transactions and use tax funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:DECLARE VACANCY ON THE MEASURE X COMMUNITY ADVISORY BODY BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-469750017 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}@font-face {font-family:"Century Gothic"; panose-1:2 11 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}p {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice Contra Costa County NOTICE C.28 The Board of Supervisors will make appointments to fill existing advisory body vacancies. Interested citizens may submit written applications for vacancies to the following address: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1025 Escobar Street, ist Floor Martinez, CA 9455 Board , Commission , or Committee Measure X Community Advisory Board Seat: District 3 Alternate Seat A ppointments will be made after February 21, 2023 I, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator, hereby certify that, in accordance with Section 54974 of the Government Code, the above notice of vacancy (vacancies) will be posted on February 7, 2023. cc: Hard Copy to Clerk of the Board Lobby Hard Copy to Minutes File Soft Copy .DOCX to M :\5-Notices and Postings Soft Copy .PDF to S:\Minutes Attachments\Minutes 2020 Soft Copy .PDF to M:\1-Committee Files and Applications I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. Attested: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors And County Administrator av i?Qv.Jtvn ~ Deputy Clerk RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the District 3, Alternate on the Measure X Community Advisory Board previously held by Sandro Trujillo and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Measure X Community Advisory Board was established by the Board of Supervisors on February 2, 2021 to advise the Board of Supervisors on the use of Measure X transactions and use tax funds. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:DECLARE VACANCY ON THE MEASURE X COMMUNITY ADVISORY BODY AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Vincent Salimi to the District 1 Seat on the Contra Costa County Aviation Advisory Committee to complete the current term ending February 28, 2023 and to a new term ending February 28, 2026 as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The purpose of the AAC is to provide advice and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County on aviation issues that (i) are related to the economic viability and security of airports in Contra Costa County, and (ii) affect the general welfare of people living and working near the airports and in the broader community. The current seat term ends this month (February 28, 2023) and the subsequent term will end February 28, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 5109320415 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINT Vincent Salimi to the District 1 seat of the Aviation Advisory Committee. RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT William Lipsin to the Appointee 1 Seat on the County Service Area P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee to a two-year term expiring December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE BACKGROUND: The County Services Area P2A Citizens Advisory Committee advises the Board of Supervisors on the needs of the Blackhawk community for extended police services which shall include, but not be limited to, enforcement of the State Vehicle Code, crime prevention, litter control, and other issues. The expiring seats were advertised, Mr. Lipsin reapplied, Supervisor Andersen is pleased with his work on the P-2A and would like him to continue. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-655-2300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, CSA P-2A CAC, Appointee C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat will be vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NONE RECOMMENDATION(S): ASSIGN the following individuals to the following seats on the Diablo Municipal Advisory Council, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen: Kathy Urbelis, President Matthew Cox, Vice President and Roads Christine Chartier, Community Liaison Greg Lorrenz, Finance Jerry Slavonia, Security FISCAL IMPACT: NONE BACKGROUND: Established on December APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-655-2300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, Diablo MAC C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:SEAT ASSIGNMENT ON THE DIABLO MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COUNCIL BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 19, 2006 via Resolution No. 2006/791, the purpose of the Council is to advise the Board of Supervisors on discretionary land use matters affecting the Diablo community, such as land use designations, general plan amendments, environmental impact reports, negative declarations, zoning-variance applications and building permit applications for additions or remodeling projects which would affect the exterior dimensions of the residence and for which noticed public hearings are required or could be required by the County's Planning Agency. The Council shall also represent the community before the County Planning Commission, the Zoning Administrator and the County Board of Supervisors on such land use, planning and zoning matters. The Council will advise in accordance with the policies and of the General Plan, including sections 3-129 and 3-138. It is understood that the Board of Supervisors is the final decision making authority and that the Council shall serve solely in an advisory capacity. In addition, the Council may: Advise the Board of Supervisors on local government services as requested by the Board; provide input and reports to the Board, county staff, or any other county hearing body on issues of concern to the community; serve as a liaison between the community and the County Supervisor representing Diablo. Except as specified above, the Council may not represent the Diablo community to any state, county, city, special district, or school district, agency or commission, or any other organization on any matter concerning the community. The Council consists of 5 members, each of whom shall be a current elected member of the Diablo Community Services District Board of Directors. On December 13, 2022 the Board of Supervisors appointed the elected Diablo CSD members as the Diablo MAC members, pursuant to Resolution 2007/166. This board order assigns the seat names to each of the members. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The members titles will not be part of the official Board of Supervisor's records. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NONE RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT Thomas Hansen to the Crockett Representative Seat on the Western Contra Costa Transit Authority for the term expiring 01/01/2025, as recommended by Supervisor Federal D. Glover. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Western Contra Costa Transit Authority (WestCAT) owns, operates and maintains a public transit system in an effort to meet public transportation needs in Western Contra Costa County. WestCAT is governed by a seven-member Board of Directors. The cities of Pinole and Hercules are each represented by two members appointed by their City Councils, while the unincorporated communities of Crockett, Rodeo, and MonTaraBay each have one representative, appointed by the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Vincent Manuel (925) 608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-APPOINT Thomas Hansen to the Western Contra Costa Transit Authority CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Position would remain vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT the following individual as the District V Representative, Regular Seat, to the Fish & Wildlife Committee with a term to expire February 28, 2027, as recommended by Supervisor Federal D. Glover. Daniel Pellegrini FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Fish & Wildlife Committee advises the Board of Supervisors on fish and wildlife issues in Contra Costa County. Make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors for the expenditure of funds from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 13103. Address issues surrounding the enforcement of fish and game laws and regulations in the County. Consider other issues which may from time to time be referred to the Committee by the Board of Supervisors. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat would remain vacant. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Vincent Manuel (925) 608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-APPOINT DANIEL PELLEGRINI TO THE FISH & WILDLIFE COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT Bruce "Ole" Ohlson to the District V Seat on the Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee to a term ending December 31, 2024, as recommended by Supervisor Federal D. Glover. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee provides input to the County and the cities of the County on bicycle projects for Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to construct bicycle/pedestrian projects and also provides advice to cities and the County on bicycle planning matters. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat would remain vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Vincent Manuel (925) 608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-APPOINT Bruce "Ole" Ohlson to the District V Seat on the Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT the following individual to the District V Representative Seat on the Aviation Advisory Committee to a new term ending February 28, 2026. Christopher E. Baker FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Aviation Advisory Committee provides advice and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on the aviation issues related to the economic viability and security of airports in Contra Costa County. The Committee may initiate discussions, observations, or investigations, in order to make its recommendations to the Board. The Committee may hear comments on airport and aviation matters from the public or other agencies for consideration and possible recommendations to the Board of Supervisors or their designees. The Aviation Advisory Committee shall cooperate with local, state, and national aviation interests for the safe and orderly APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Vincent Manuel (925) 608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-Appoint Christopher E. Baker to the Aviation Advisory Committee BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) operation of airports. The Aviation Advisory Committee shall advance and promote the interests of aviation and protect the general welfare of the people living and working near the airport and the County in general. In conjunction with all of the above, the Aviation Advisory Committee shall provide a forum for the Director of Airports regarding policy matters at and around the airports. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The position would remain vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. Please return completed applications to: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1025 Escobar Street, 1st Floor Martinez, CA 94553 or email to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Contra Costa County Do you work in Contra Costa County? Home Address - Street City Postal Code Primary Phone (best number to reach you)Email Address Resident of Supervisorial District (if out of County, please enter N/A): If Yes, in which District do you work? BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION First Name Middle Initial Last Name Occupational Licenses Completed: G.E.D. Certificate Yes No No Degree Type/Course of Study/Major Degree AwardedColleges or Universities Attended High School Diploma CA High School Proficiency Certificate EDUCATIO N Yes Yes Yes No State Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Pl ease check one: Yes No If Yes, how many? No Check appropriate box if you possess one of the following: PAGE 1 of 3 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT Current Employer Job Title Length of Employment How long have you lived or worked in Contra Costa County? Board, Committee, or Commission Seat Name Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Other Trainings Completed: Yes No District Locator Tool Yes NoWould you like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which you may be qualified? Are you a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces? Yes No Do you have any obligations that might affect your attendance at scheduled meetings? If Yes, please explain: Yes No Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume). Please check one: Yes No If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you are currently serving: Please check one: Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the county, such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships? Do you have a familial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships listed under the "Important Information" section on page 3 of this application or Resolution No. 2021/234). List any volunteer and community experience, including any boards on which you have served. If Yes, please also list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served: Please check one: Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: I am including my resume with this application: Please check one: Yes No Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board? PAGE 2 of 3 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, committee, or commission. 1025 Escobar Street, 1st Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Submit this application to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us OR Clerk of the Board 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 7.As indicated in Board Resolution 2021/234, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors' member in any of the following relationships: (1) Mother, father, son, and daughter; (2) Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; (3) Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; (4) Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297; (5) The relatives, as defined in 1 and 2 above, for a registered domestic partner; (6) Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov't Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. 1.This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. Important Information Questions about this application? Contact the Clerk of the Board at (925) 655-2000 or by email at ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Signed: Date: I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements and/or ommissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. PAGE 3 of 3 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT Please return completed applications to: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Martinez, CA 94553 or email to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Contra Costa County Home Address - Street City Code P hone (best number to reach you)Email Resident of Supervisorial District BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION G.E.D. Certifi Yes No Course of Study/Major Degree AwardedColleges or Universities Attended High School Diploma CA High School Proficiency Certificate EDUCATION Yes Yes Yes Yes Please check one: If s, how many? No Seat Name Yes No Y No No Yes No Please check one: Yes No f Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the county, such as grants, contracts, or Do you have a familial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to or Resolution o. 20 /) Please check one: Yes No f Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please check one: Submit this application to:Clerk of the Board 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 7.As indicated in Board Resolution 20 /, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors member in any of the following relationships: 1.This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. Important Information Questions about this application? Contact the Clerk of the Board at (925) or by email at ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Signed: Date: I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements and/or ommissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. Joshua McMurray RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT the following individuals to the seats referenced below on the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) for a two-year term with an expiration date of September 30, 2024: -B10 Public Managers’ Association Representative: Joshua McMurray, Oakley, CA 94561 -C5 Public Provider Field Paramedic Representative: Lance Maples, San Ramon, CA 94583 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The EMCC is a multidisciplinary committee appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, to provide advice and recommendations on EMS-related matters to the Board, Health Services Director, and its EMS Agency. Membership consists of consumer representatives, and representatives of EMS-related organizations and groups. On November 28, 2022, the Public Managers’ Association (PMA) group selected Joshua McMurray for the appointment as the PMA seat representative. No other candidates were nominated for the PMA seat (B10). On January 9, 2023, the Public Provider Field Paramedics group selected Lance Maples for the appointment as the Public Provider Field Paramedic Representative. No other candidates were nominated for the Public Provider Field Paramedic seat (C5). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marshall Bennett, (925) 608-5454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointments to the Emergency Medical Care Committee CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the B10 Public Managers’ Association Representative and C5 Public Provider Field Paramedic Representative seats on the EMCC will not be filled. ATTACHMENTS Candidate Application_J.McMurray_EMCC Candidate Application_L.Maples_EMCC RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. AP005040, authorizing revenue and expenditure adjustments of $1,269,407 due to new funding received from California Volunteers-Office of the Governor in the Employment and Human Services Department’s (EHSD) Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County (WDBCCC). FISCAL IMPACT: EHSD’s WDBCCC current year appropriations and revenue will be increased by $1,269,407. This funding consists of 100% state funding and no additional County general fund costs will result from these adjustments. BACKGROUND: WDBCCC has secured funding of $2,423,457 over a two-year period from the California Volunteers-Office of the Governor. Of this award, $1,269,407 will be appropriated to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and the remaining amount will be included in the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 budget. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appropriations will not be properly allocated. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 908-608-4832 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Workforce Development Board Appropriation Adjustment AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC24/27_AP005040 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Approp Adj 5040 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriation Adjustment No. 005035 authorizing the transfer of current year fund balance of $130,125 to the Office of Communications & Media/CCTV for the purchase of media related equipment of tricasters and a shared media server, as recommended by the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: The Final County Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 includes "Obligated Fund Balances for FY 2022-23, Schedule 4" showing that $3,316,906 has been obligated to CCTV/PEG (Public, Educational, Government Access Channels) in the General Fund. (p. 11) This appropriation adjustment will reduce that amount by $130,125 to provide for the purchase of critical equipment for the operations of CCTV. BACKGROUND: Fund Balance Available will be increased in 0005 by $130,125 and capital appropriations will be increased in Org. 1225 (Office of Communications & Media/CCTV) to provide appropriations in FY 22-23 for the purchase of replacement video production system and shared media server. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appropriations will not be properly allocated to provide for the purchase of this necessary equipment to operate the CCTV functions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, (925) 655-2057 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Fund Balance Appropriation for Media Equipment in CCTV AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC24/27_AP005035 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Approp Adj 5035 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Supervisor Ken Carlson as the Board of Supervisors representative and Dr. Sara Levin as the County Health Services Department representative to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Task Force for Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan implementation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to update the Board's Master Resolution for Board Committee appointments, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) Plan was conducted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) with support from Contra Costa County. The ATS Plan reviewed how transportation services are provided to seniors, persons with disabilities, and veterans. The ATS Plan was completed in late 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved the Plan at their March 9, 2021 meeting and CCTA gave final approval shortly thereafter. The ATS Plan included recommendations and implementation steps, one of which was to form a Task Force that would oversee implementation. The Task Force has a similar make-up to its predecessor, the Policy Advisory Committee which oversaw the development of the ATS Plan. The recommendations will fill the two County seats on the Task Force, one for the Board of Supervisors and the other for the Health Services Department. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Cunningham, (925) 655-2915 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Lia Muñoz Bristol , Sara K. Levin, MD, FACP, Clerk of the Board C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:County Appointments: CCTA Accessible Transportation Task Force BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The make up of the Task Force is below: Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board (1)1. Contra Costa Board of Supervisors2. Southwest Area Transportation Committee (SWAT)3. East County Transportation Planning Committee (TRANSPLAN)4. Central County Transportation Partnership and Cooperation (TRANSPAC)5. West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC)6. Tri Delta Transit7. West Contra Costa Transit Authority8. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District9. Bay Area Rapid Transit10. County Connection11. Contra Costa Health Services12. Low-Income Community13. Non-Governmental Agency (NGO)/Advocate/Senior14. NGO/Advocate/Disabled15. NGO/Advocate/Senior/Disabled16. Paratransit User17. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommended actions are not taken, the County will not have full representation on the Task Force for the Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan. HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Add three (3) Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) (represented) position at Salary and Grade 255 1434 ($6,086 – $7,398) and cancel one (1) Eligibility Worker I (XHWA) (represented) position 4581 at Salary and Grade 255 0948 ($3,637 – $4,420), one (1) Clerk-Experienced Level (JWXB) (represented) position 4150 at Salary and Grade 3RH 0750 ($3,571– $4,431), one (1) Children’s Clerical Specialist (J9SC) (represented) position 3970 at Salary and Grade 3R5 1092 ($4,194– $5,902) in the Children and Families Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26102 to add three (3) Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) (represented) positions at Salary Plan and Grade 255 1434 ($6,086 – $7,398) and cancel one (1) Eligibility Worker I (XHWA) (represented) position number 4581 at Salary Plan and Grade 255 0948 ($3,637 – $4,420), one (1) Clerk-Experienced Level (JWXB) (represented) position number 4150 at Salary Plan and Grade 3RH 0750 ($3,571– $4,431), and one (1) Children’s Clerical Specialist (J9SC) (represented) position number 3970 at Salary Plan and Grade 3R5 1092 ($4,194– $5,902) in the Children and Families Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of this position there is a County cost of $2,903.38 for fiscal year FY 22-23. This position is funded with 28% Federal and 68 % State revenue, and a 4% net County cost. The annual pension cost is approximately $113,997. BACKGROUND: Employment and Human Services Department reviewed the classifications including job skills and abilities and job duties and recommends that a Social Casework Assistant position APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bao Tran, (925) 608-5027 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Add three (3) FTE Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) in the Children and Families Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) be added to Children and Family Services and an Eligibility Worker II position canceled. Social Casework Assistants (SCA) perform services such as visitation supervision, parent training, home visits, transportation, relative notification, family finding, placement support; all of which are mandated services for Child Welfare to provide in order to meet the "reasonable efforts" findings in court hearings. These services are necessary to ensure the agency meets our legal obligation to assist families in meeting the needs of their children to return home or to remain home safely. The Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) (AB 403) passed by the State Legislature is a major initiative with a significant workload impact. In order to comply with the mandates of this legislation, we will need to build an infrastructure for a robust recruitment, family finding and respite program in order to place children in a family setting and not in residential group care. SCA will perform these functions for the agency allowing social workers to focus on family service delivery and risk assessment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If these positions are not added Children and Family Services will have insufficient staff to adequately ensure state mandated compliance requirements are met. The children will be at risk of experiencing multiple placement changes and remaining in long term foster care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: These services are essential to the children’s ability to receive services and reunify with their families in a timely manner. Their placement options with birth families and kin providers will increase, therefore avoiding placements in stranger care and group home facilities. The children will avoid long term foster care and have more stable placements that will result in permanent situations such as legal guardianship and adoption. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 26102 HR Recommendations P300 26102 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26102 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26079 DATE 1/1/2023 Department No./ Department Library Budget Unit No. 0620 Org No. 3714 Agency No. 85 Action Requested: Cancel Information System Specialist III (LTTA) position number 10236. Add one (1) 40/40 Information Systems Programmer/Analyst (LPVA) position Proposed Effective Date: 1/1/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $5,546.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $2,773.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Library Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Alison McKee ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT /s/ Julie Enea 12/1/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 12/2/2022 Cancel one (1) vacant Information Systems Specialist III (LTTA) (represented) position #10236 at salary plan and grade TB5 1541 ($6,542 - $7,953) and add one (1) Information Systems Programmer and Analyst II (LPVA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZA5 1594 ($6,895 - $8,381) in the Library Department. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 12/2/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Res ources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 12/8/2022 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26079 to cancel one (1) vacant Information Systems Specialist III (LTTA) (represented) position #10236 at salary plan and grade TB5 1541 ($6,542 - $7,953) and add one (1) Information Systems Programmer and Analyst II (LPVA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZA5 1594 ($6,895 - $8,381) in the Library Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost to the Library Fund of approximately $5,546. No fiscal impact to the County general fund. BACKGROUND: The Library seeks to add replace one vacant full-time Information Systems Specialist III position and replace it with a full-time Information Systems Programmer and Analyst II position in its Automation unit. Shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic closures, the Library was the target of a ransomware attack. As a result of this, the Library and DoIT implemented multiple new security procedures to protect from malicious attacks across all network services. The Library’s Automation unit, which handles internet security and the installation of hardware and software for over 1000 public and staff computers, has had increased work and responsibility as a result of the fallout from the ransomware attack as well as additional procedures due to COVID-19 protocols. In this structure, the Library maintains all applications for direct service to the public, such as public computers, the automated circulation system, and vendor databases. As the needs for information technology support continue to evolve in this new structure, the Library has identified other unmet needs which would be provided by a programmer and analyst position. This new position would meet Library-specific needs for the implementation of vendor databases, security assessment of vendor databases, troubleshooting patron and staff issues, and the inter-operation of Library-specific applications. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samuel Treanor at 925-608-7702 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Samuel Treanor, Sylvia WongTam C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:Alison McKee, County Librarian Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancel one full-time Information Systems Specialist III position; Add one full-time Information Systems Programmer/Analyst II position BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) In establishing this position, the duties performed by a currently vacant Information Systems Specialist III position would be distributed to this new position and to other staff within the Automation unit. Consequently, the vacant position would be redundant and could be eliminated. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this position change is not approved, the Library will not be able to sufficiently meet its internet security needs and obligations. Services to the public may also be impacted in that some planned database and other program implementations would need to be delayed or canceled. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 26079 Cancel ISS III Add ISPA II in Library IT MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26079 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26088 DATE 12/20/2022 Department No./ Department Conservation and Development Budget Unit No. 0280 Org No. 2601 Agency No. 38 Action Requested: Add one (1) Account Clerk – Experienced Level position, add one (1) Secretary - Advanced Level position, and cancel (1) Network Administrator – I position Proposed Effective Date: 1/10/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $43,441.13 Net County Cost Total this FY N.C.C. this FY SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Land Development Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. /s/ John Kopchik ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT /s/ Julie Enea 12/27/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 1/11/2023 Add one (1) Account Clerk – Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position at a salary plan and grade 3RH -0755 ($3,924.19 - $4,864.83), add one (1) Secretary - Advanced Level (J3TG) position at a salary plan and grade 3R2 -1163 ($4,636.31 - $5,934.87), and cancel one (1) Network Administrator – I (LNSA) (represented) position (Position # 00017185) at a salary plan and grade ZA5-1694 ($7,613.18 - $9,253.86) in the Department of Conservation Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 1/11/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Res ources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 1/5/2023 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26088 to add one (1) Account Clerk – Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position at a salary plan and grade 3RH 0755 ($3,924.19 - $4,864.83), add one (1) Secretary - Advanced Level (J3TG) (represented) position at a salary plan and grade 3R2 1163 ($4,636.31 - $5,934.87), and cancel one (1) Network Administrator – I (LNSA) (represented) position number 00017185 at a salary plan and grade ZA5 1694 ($7,613.18 - $9,253.86) in the Department of Conservation and Development. FISCAL IMPACT: The net cost is $43,441.13 annually, of which $8,207.20 is retirement costs. Funding for these positions will come entirely from Land Development funds. BACKGROUND: The Business and Information Services Division of the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) is requesting the addition of two new positions. The Account Clerk – Experienced Level position is needed to provide additional support and facilitate redistribution of workload within our Fiscal Section to better support operational needs. This additional Account Clerk – Experienced Level position is also necessitated in part due to recent staffing changes. The Secretary - Advanced Level position is needed to support our recently appointed Deputy Director. The Secretary - Advanced Level classification encompasses the skill set needed for the job functions, specifically related to administrative support. This Secretary - Advanced Level would report directly to and receive work from the Deputy Director of the Business and Information Services Division. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the addition of these positions are not approved, the Department will not have the appropriate staff to meet current needs thereby negatively impacting operations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alvan Mangalindan, (925) 655-2787 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Alvan Mangalindan C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Add Two Positions and Cancel One Position in the Conservation and Development Department AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 26088_DCD Add Acct Clerk and Sec-Adv Lvl_Cxl NW Admin I MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26088 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Reassign one (1) Account Clerk – Advanced Level (JDTD) (represented) position number 1042 at Salary Plan and Grade 3RX 1113 ($4,357 – $5,564), one (1) Accounting Technician (JD7A) (represented) position number 16063 at Salary Plan and Grade 3RX 1236 ($4,824 – $6,161) and incumbent, one (1) Accountant I (SAWA) (represented) position number 1163 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1332 ($5,319 - $6,466) and incumbent, four (4) Accountant III (SATA) (represented) position numbers, 1408, 13349, 17066, 17164 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1576 ($6,773 – $8,233) and incumbents, one (1) Administrative Services Assistant III (APTA) (represented) position number 19028 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1631 ($7,152 - $8,694), and one (1) Departmental Fiscal Officer (APSA) (unrepresented) position number 1164 at Salary Plan and Grade B82 1724 ($8 ,083 – $9,848) and incumbent from the Community Services Bureau to the Administrative Services Bureau in the Employment and Human Services Department. POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26101 DATE 12/22/2022 Department No./ Department Employment and Human Services Budget Unit No. 0501 Org No. 5101 Agency No. 19 Action Requested: reassign one (1) Account Clerk – Advance Level (JDTD) (represented), one (1) Accounting Technician (JD7A) (represented) position number 16063 and incumbent, one (1) Accountant I (SAWA) (represented) position number 1163 and incumbent, four (4) Accountant III position numbers, 1408, 13349, 17066, 17164 and incum bents, one (1) Administrative Services Assistant III position number 19028 from budget 0588 to 0501. Proposed Effective Date: 1/1/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $0.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Cost Neutral Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Marcie Clark ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kaitlyn Jeffus for 1/10/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 1/11/2023 See attached document for HR Recommendations Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 1/11/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 1/11/2023 No. xxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26101 to reassign one (1) Account Clerk – Advanced Level (JDTD) (represented) position number 1042 at Salary Plan and Grade 3RX 1113 ($4,357 – $5,564), one (1) Accounting Technician (JD7A) (represented) position number 16063 at Salary Plan and Grade 3RX 1236 ($4,824 – $6,161) and incumbent, one (1) Accountant I (SAWA) (represented) position number 1163 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1332 ($5,319 - $6,466) and incumbent, four (4) Accountant III (SATA) (represented) position numbers, 1408, 13349, 17066, 17164 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1576 ($6,773 – $8,233) and incumbents, one (1) Administrative Services Assistant III (APTA) (represented) position number 19028 at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1631 ($7,152 - $8,694), and one (1) Departmental Fiscal Officer (APSA) (unrepresented) position number 1164 at Salary Plan and Grade B82 1724 ($8,083 – $9,848) and incumbent from the Community Services Bureau to the Administrative Services Bureau in the Employment and Human Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of this action will have a salary and benefit cost shift from the Community Services Bureau (0588) to the Administrative Services Bureau (0501). Actual costs for these positions have been journaled to the correct department and org. This action will eliminate the need for future correction journals. These positions and the appropriate costs will be allocated to the Community Services Bureau and the Administrative Services Bureau. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marcie Clark (925) 608-5022 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcie Clark C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Reassign positions and incumbents from Community Services Bureau to Administrative Services Bureau in the Employment and Human Services Department. BACKGROUND: In August 2006, the Board of Supervisors approved a proposal to integrate the Community Services Department into the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD). In January 2007, the Board gave final approval to the merger and the integration of the Community Services Bureau (CSB) Chart of Accounts into the EHSD Chart of Accounts. The Board took this action in order to increase administrative efficiencies and improve the coordination of services to the common customer population. This action continues this transition by integrating CSB Fiscal into EHSD fiscal to improve oversight and consistency of fiscal practices. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Department’s budget will not align with its position management data, and the County will not be able to maximize efficiency in administering Fiscal functions. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 26101 52124 P300 26101 HR Recommendations BOS 2.7.23 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26101 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26097 DATE 1/3/2023 Department No./ Department District Attorney Budget Unit No. 0242 Org No. 2800 Agency No. 42 Action Requested: ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26097 to add one (1) Planner and Evaluator – Level B (VCXD) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZB2 1323 ($5,432.19 – $8,901.27) and cancel one (1) vacant Administrative Services Assistant III (APTA) (represented) position in the District Attorney's Office. Proposed Effective Date: 01/18/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $0.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT General Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Monica Carlisle ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT E.Farrell (for Paul Reyes) 1/5/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 1/11/2023 Add one (1) Planner and Evaluator – Level B (VCXD) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZB2 1323 ($5,432.19 – $8,901.27), and cancel one (1) vacant Administrative Services Assistant III (APTA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZB5 1631 ($7,152.79 - $8,694.26) position #18830 in the District Attorney's Office. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 1/11/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 2/1/2023 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Paul Reyes Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 2/2/2023 No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26097 to add one (1) Planner and Evaluator – Level B (VCXD) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZB2 1323 ($5,432.19 – $8,901.27) and cancel one (1) vacant Administrative Services Assistant III (APTA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZB5 1631 ($7,152.79 - $8,694.26) position number 18830 in the District Attorney's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this request is cost neutral. All costs are budgeted in the District Attorney's Office, General Fund. BACKGROUND: Upon a review of the District Attorney’s Office staffing levels in 2021, it was determined the Department did not have the appropriate level of staffing to accomplish the desired level of analytical review of data and evaluation of various programs. Effective July 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved the addition of one Administrative Services Assistant III position in the District Attorney’s Office to provide support in the areas of complex data analysis, processing, and reporting for its general and data driven operations. However, recruitment APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Monica Carlisle, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Monica Carlisle C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one (1) Planner and Evaluator – Level B and cancel one (1) vacant Administrative Services Assistant III BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) conducted for the ASA III classification wasn’t successful in attracting eligible candidates with sufficient data analysis and program evaluation skill sets and experience. Therefore, the department requests to cancel the vacant ASA III position and add a Planner and Evaluator-Level B position instead. The Planner and Evaluator-Level B will conduct complex data collection and analysis, perform in-depth program evaluation, and document and present findings and recommendations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the District Attorney's Office will continue to have recruitment difficulties to fill a critical position to support the department’s efforts in data driven operations and program evaluations. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No 26097 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26097 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26107 DATE 1/6/2023 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6386 Agency No. 18 Action Requested: Increase the hours of one (1) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) position no. 18533 and its incumbent from 31/40 to 35/40 in the Health Services Department (Represented) Proposed Effective Date: 2/8/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost increase $36,347 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $15,145 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Laurén Jimenez ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kaitlyn Jeffus for 1/30/23 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 2/1/2023 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approved as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date _______ No. xxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26107 to increase the hours of one (1) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) position No. 18533 (represented) at salary plan and grade 1PX-1000 ($17,464 - $19,917) from 31/40 to 35/40 in the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost increase of $36,347, with $9,268 in pension cost included. This cost increase will be 100% funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: Incumbents in this classification have the ability to request that their position hours be increased or decreased, as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the Physicians and Dentists of Contra Costa Union. The incumbent of position no. 18533 requested to increase their hours from 31/40 to 35/40, effective as soon as feasible. Four (4) hours will be added to the current work schedule of the incumbent to precept the current Medical Residents as they are not allowed to work alone and be unsupervised in the clinics. The Medical Staffing Office determined that the increase of hours as requested by the incumbent will benefit the service needs and scheduling of Medical Residents. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauren Jimenez, 925-957-5262 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lauren Jimenez, Kathi Caudel, Gina Soleimanieh, Linh Huynh C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Increase the Hours of One (1) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) Position and its Incumbent in the Health Services Department CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the department will not be able to increase staffing levels to appropriately precept the current Medical Residents in the clinics. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 26107 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26107 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 62112 DATE 1/25/2023 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6387 & 6388 Agency No. 18 Action Requested: Decrease the hours of two (2) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) position no’s 18925 and 18348, and its incumbents. Hours from position no. 18925 (org no. 6387) will decrease from 35/40 to 31/40, and hours from position no. 18348 (org no. 6388) will decrease from 40/40 to 31/40 in the Health Services Department (Represented) Proposed Effective Date: 2/7/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost savings $118,128.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $49,220.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: 100% Cost Savings to Hospital Enterprise Fund I Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Laurén Jimenez ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kaitlyn Jeffus for 1/30/23 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 2/2/2023 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date _______ No. xxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26112 to decrease the hours of two (2) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) position No. 18925 (Org # 6387) from 35/40 to 31/40 and position no. 18348 (Org # 6388) from 40/40 to 31/40, at salary plan and grade 1PX-1000 ($17,464 - $19,917) and its incumbents in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this will result in an annual cost savings of approximately $118,128, with $30,122 in pension cost already included. The cost savings will be to Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: Incumbents in this classification have the ability to request that their position hours be increased or decreased, as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding between the County and Physicians and Dentists of Contra Costa union. The incumbent in position No. 18925 (Org # 6387) has requested to reduce their hours from 35/40 to 31/40, and the incumbent in position No. 18348 (Org # 6388) has requested to reduce their hours from 40/40 to 31/40 due to scheduling changes. The Medical Staffing Office has determined that the reduction of hours as requested by the incumbents will have no significant impact on meeting service needs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauren Jimenez, 925-957-5262 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lauren Jimenez, Kathi Caudel, Gina Soleimanieh, Linh Huynh C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Decrease the Hours of Two (2) Primary Care Provider - Exempt (VPT5) Positions and its Incumbents in the Health Services Department CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the department will not be able to fulfill the request of the incumbents. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 62112 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 62112 P300 No. 26116 - Attachment A Dept ID Dept Name Total FTE Job Code Job Title Position Hours Salary Plan and Grade Salary Monthly 0301 Detention 5.00 5700 V5VH OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST II 40 TC5-1746 $8,015 - $9,742 5700 VT7G LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE 40 TAX-1287 $5,074 - $6,480 5701 VT7G LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE 40 TAX-1287 $5,074 - $6,480 5700 JWXD CLERK-SPECIALIST LEVEL 40 3RX-1156 $4,457 - $5,692 5701 VWSD NURSE PRACTITIONER 40 L35-1873 $13,261 - $16,561 0860 CCHP 16.00 6119 VT7G LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE 40 TAX-1287 $5,074 - $6,480 6118 VANG HS ADMIN - LEVEL B 40 ZB2-1323 $5,432 - $8,901 6120 VCVB HP SALES REP 40 TC5-1406 $5,724 - $6,957 6105 VRTA HP AUTHORIZATION REP 40 3RX-1119 $4,297 - $5,487 6119 VT7G LICENSED VOCATIONAL NURSE 40 TAX-1287 $5,074 - $6,480 6123 LBTB HS INFO SYS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6123 LBTB HS INFO SYS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6123 LBTB HS INFO SYS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6123 LBTB HS INFO SYS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6123 LBTB HS INFO SYS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 5123 VNTA MED RECORDS CODER 40 3RX-1119 $4,297 - $5,487 6123 V9VE HP MEMBER SVCS COUNSELOR 40 TC5-1182 $4,585 - $5,573 6123 V9VE HP MEMBER SVCS COUNSELOR 40 TC5-1182 $4,585 - $5,573 6123 V9VE HP MEMBER SVCS COUNSELOR 40 TC5-1182 $4,585 - $5,573 6121 JWXB CLERK EXP LVL 40 3RH-0750 $3,571 - $4,431 6125 JWXB CLERK EXP LVL 40 3RH-0750 $3,571 - $4,431 0450 Public Health 15.00 5750 JWV1 INTERMEDIATE TYPIST CLERK - PROJ 40 3RH - 0753 $3,680 - $ 4,566 5750 JWV1 INTERMEDIATE TYPIST CLERK - PROJ 40 3RH - 0753 $3,680 - $ 4,566 5750 JWV1 INTERMEDIATE TYPIST CLERK - PROJ 40 3RH - 0753 $3,680 - $ 4,566 5750 9GV1 EMERGENCY PLANNING COORD I-PROJ 40 Z25 - 1501 $6,288 - $7,644 5750 VMWD HEALTH EDUCATION SPECIALIST 40 TC5 - 1207 $4,700 - $5,713 5750 VMWD HEALTH EDUCATION SPECIALIST 40 TC5 - 1207 $4,700 - $5,713 5750 JWXB CLERK-EXPERIENCED LEVEL 40 3RH - 0750 $3,571 - $$4,431 5750 VKVB COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER II 40 TC5 - 1043 $3,996 - $4,857 5750 VKVB COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER II 40 TC5 - 1043 $3,996 - $4,857 5750 J3X2 SECRETARY ADVANCED - PROJECT 40 3R2 - 1163 $4,636 - $5,934 5750 VBS2 PH PROGRAM SPECIALIST I-PROJECT 40 Z15 - 1602 $6,950 - $8,448 5750 VWX2 REGISTERED NURSE-PROJ BEG LEVEL 40 L35 - 1634 $10,450 (FLAT) 5750 JWXC CLERK-SENIOR LEVEL 40 3RX-1033 $3,946 - $5,039 5750 AP7B PERSONNEL TECHNICIAN 40 B85-1308 $5,729 - $6,964 0466 AODS 9.80 5911 VCS6 PLANNER/EVALUATOR LEVL B-PROJ 32 ZB2-1323 $5,432 - $8,901 5903 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1384 $5,770 - $8,566 5911 VHGE SUBS ABUSE PRG MANAGER 40 ZA5-1750 $8,047 - $9,781 5938 VQW7 MH COMM SUPORT WRK I-PROJ 40 TC5-0875 $3,383 - $4,112 5938 VQW7 MH COMM SUPORT WRK I-PROJ 40 TC5-0875 $3,383 - $4,112 5921 VKVB COMM HEALTH WRK II 40 TC5-1043 $3,996 - $4,857 5933 VHTC SUBS ABUSE LEAD COUNS 40 TC5-1503 $6,301- $7,659 5933 VHWE SUBS ABUSE COUNS TRAINEE 40 TC5-0903 $3,478 - $4,228 5911 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1384 $5,770 - $8,566 5925 VKWC COMM HEALTH WRK I 40 TC5-0933 $3,583 - $3,951 0540 CCRMC/HC 173.38 6308 JWXB CLERK-EXPERIENCED LEVEL 40 3RH - 0750 $3,571 - $$4,431 6313 JWXC CLERK-SENIOR LEVEL 40 3RX-1033 $3,946 - $5,039 6313 JWXC CLERK-SENIOR LEVEL 40 3RX-1033 $3,946 - $5,039 6313 1KSA DIETITIAN 40 5C5-1376 $5,556 - $6,754 6313 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1834 $5,770 - $8,566 6313 VQWB PSYCHIATRIC TECHNICIAN 40 TAX-1240 $4,844 - $6,186 6313 VPT0 PSYCHTRST-EMG SVC/DET HLTH-EX 40 1PX-1011 $18,616 - $21,154 6313 VWXG REGISTERED NURSE 24 L32-1880 $11,541 - $14,414 6330 VT7F ANESTHESIA TECHNICIAN 40 TAX-1005 $3,838 - $4,901 Page 1 of 4 P300 No. 26116 - Attachment A 6330 VWXG REGISTERED NURSE 40 L32-1880 $11,541 - $14,414 6330 VWXG REGISTERED NURSE 40 L32-1880 $11,541 - $14,414 6330 VT7B SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIST 40 TAX-1174 $5,445 - $6,953 6339 VIHC CARDIOLOGY SERVICES MANAGER 40 ZA5-1013 $9,299 - $11,304 6339 VIGB RESPIRATORY CARE SERVICES MGR 40 ZA5-1012 $9,470 - 11,512 6339 VIHB RESPIRATORY CARE SERVICES SUPV 40 ZA5-1011 $8,610 - $10,466 6339 VIHB RESPIRATORY CARE SERVICES SUPV 40 ZA5-1011 $8,610 - $10,466 6345 JWXB CLERK-EXPERIENCED LEVEL 40 3RH - 0750 $3,571 - $$4,431 6345 VYWA PHARMACIST I 40 TC5-1998 $12,344 - $14,290 6351 1EWA STERILE PROCESS AND DIST TECH 40 TA5-1015 $3,886 - $4,724 6355 JWXB CLERK-EXPERIENCED LEVEL 40 3RH - 0750 $3,571 - $$4,431 6355 JWXD CLERK-SPECIALIST LEVEL 40 3RX-1156 $4,457 - $5,692 6355 V8VD ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGIST I 40 TC5-1853 $8,911 - $9,824 6365 VFVB CYTOTECHNOLOGIST 40 TC5-1644 $7,245 - $8,806 6371 V5WF THERAPIST ASSISTANT 40 TC5-1435 $5,891 - $7,160 6377 VANH HEALTH SVCS ADMIN-LEVEL C 40 ZB2-1723 $8,071 - $10,332 6377 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1834 $5,770 - $8,566 6377 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1834 $5,770 - $8,566 6377 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1834 $5,770 - $8,566 6377 VQHP MH PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 40 ZA5-1749 $8,039 - $9,771 6377 V9WG REGISTERED DENTAL ASSISTANT 40 TZ5-1085 $4,165 - $5,063 6377 VWXG REGISTERED NURSE 40 L32-1880 $11,541 - $14,414 6380 VT7E ORTHOPEDIC TECHNICIAN 40 TAX-0996 $3,804 - $4,858 6380 1EWA STERILE PROCESS AND DIST TECH 40 TA5-1015 $3,886 - $4,724 6381 VWTF CHARGE NURSE 40 L35-1883 $13,393-$16,726 6381 X4VH MEDICAL SOCIAL WORKER 40 255-1590 $7,103 - $8,633 6381 VQSB MH CLINICAL SPECIALIST 40 TC2-1834 $5,770 - $8,566 6384 VKWC COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER I 40 TC5-0933 $3,583 - $3,951 6388 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6417 VQDC MH PROGRAM MANAGER 40 ZA5-1844 $8,832 - $10,735 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 22 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 22 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 22 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 22 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 26 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 26 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 30 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VPT1 AMBULATORY CARE PROVIDER-EX 31 1PX-1001 $15,284 - 17,333 6462 VQTB CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST 20 TC2-1483 $6,364 - $8,993 6462 VQTB CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST 40 TC2-1483 $6,364 - $8,993 6462 VPT2 DENTIST-EXEMPT 22 1PX-1002 $13,046 - $14,825 6462 VPT2 DENTIST-EXEMPT 26 1PX-1002 $13,046 - $14,825 6462 VPT2 DENTIST-EXEMPT 32 1PX-1002 $13,046 - $14,825 6462 VPT2 DENTIST-EXEMPT 35 1PX-1002 $13,046 - $14,825 6462 VPT2 DENTIST-EXEMPT 35 1PX-1002 $13,046 - $14,825 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 20 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 20 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 28 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 28 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VPS3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1003 $19,074 - $21,675 6462 VP71 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS I 40 1R5-1285 $5,028 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) Page 2 of 4 P300 No. 26116 - Attachment A 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VP74 EXEMPT MED STF RES PHYS III 40 1R5-1565 $5,895 (FLAT) 6462 VPT3 HOSPITALIST-EXEMPT 18 1PX-1004 $17,395 - $19,767 6462 VPT3 HOSPITALIST-EXEMPT 20 1PX-1004 $17,395 - $19,767 6462 VPT3 HOSPITALIST-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1004 $17,395 - $19,767 6462 VWSD NURSE PRACTITIONER 40 L35-1873 $13,261 - $16,561 6462 VWSD NURSE PRACTITIONER 40 L35-1873 $13,261 - $16,561 6462 VWSD NURSE PRACTITIONER 40 L35-1873 $13,261 - $16,561 6462 VPS5 OBGYN-FULL SPECTRUM-EXEMPT 22 1PX-1005 $17,548 - $19,941 6462 VPS5 OBGYN-FULL SPECTRUM-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1005 $17,548 - $19,941 6462 VPS7 OPTOMETRIST-EXEMPT 32 1PX-1007 $9,308 - $10,577 6462 VPS8 ORAL SURGEON-EXEMPT 22 1PX-1004 $17,395 - $19,767 6462 VPS9 PEDIATRICIAN-AMBULATORY-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1009 $17,384 - $19,854 6462 VPS0 PEDIATRICIAN-HOSPITALIST-EX 40 1PX-1006 $15,869 - $18,033 6462 VPT5 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT5 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT5 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT5 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-EXEMPT 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 24 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 29 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 31 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 31 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 35 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 36 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6462 VPT6 PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER-LMTD-EX 40 1PX-1000 $17,463 - $19,916 6501 1KSA DIETITIAN 20 5C5-1376 $5,556 - $6,754 6501 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 32 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6501 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6501 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6505 VWHH NURSING SHIFT COORDINATOR 40 ZZX-1003 $14,449 - $17,562 6510 JWHF CLERICAL SUPERVISOR 40 K6X-1290 $5,089 - $6,500 6515 VNTB MEDICAL RECORDS TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1119 $4,297 - $5,487 6522 1KWC INST SVCS AIDE 40 TB5-0828 $3,229 - $3,925 6522 1KWC INST SVCS AIDE 40 TB5-0828 $3,229 - $3,925 6522 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 20 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6522 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 24 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6522 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6522 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6522 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6522 1KVE INST SVCS WORKER-SPECIALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6536 VCSH ASST FACILITIES MANAGER 40 ZA5-1631 $7,152 - $8,694 6544 VCB2 CCRMC CHIEF EXEC OFFFICER-EXEMPT 40 B85-2645 $31,848 (FLAT) 6544 VWD1 CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER-EXEMPT 40 B8L-2448 $17,053 (FLAT) 6544 VAB2 CHIEF QUALITY OFFICER-EXEMPT 40 B85-2508 $21,823 (FLAT) 6544 VANH HEALTH SVCS ADMIN-LEVEL C 40 ZB2-1723 $8,071 - $10,332 6544 VCA2 MEDICAL DIRECTOR-EXEMPT 40 B85-2645 $31,848 (FLAT) 6544 VWHF NURSING PROGRAM MANAGER 40 ZZX-1002 $15,930 - $17,562 6551 91WC STOREROOM CLERK 40 TB5-0916 $3,523 $4,283 6551 91WC STOREROOM CLERK 40 TB5-0916 $3,523 $4,283 6555 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6555 LBD4 ASST HS IT DIR-APP DEV-EX 40 B85-2212 $12,719 - $15,460 6555 LBD7 ASST HS IT DIR-INFO SECURITY-E 40 B85-2212 $12,719 - $15,460 6555 LBNA AUTOMATED CALL DIS COORD II 40 ZB5-1714 $7,765 - $9,438 6555 LKVB COMPUTER OPERATOR II 40 TB5-1166 $4.513 - $5,486 6555 LKVB COMPUTER OPERATOR II 40 TB5-1168 $4,513 - $5,486 6555 LKTA COMPUTER OPERATOR III 40 TB5-1263 $4,928 - $6,039 6555 LBTC HEALTH SVCS INFO SYS PROG/ANL 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTC HEALTH SVCS INFO SYS PROG/ANL 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTC HEALTH SVCS INFO SYS PROG/ANL 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTC HEALTH SVCS INFO SYS PROG/ANL 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTC HEALTH SVCS INFO SYS PROG/ANL 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 Page 3 of 4 P300 No. 26116 - Attachment A 6555 LBTB HEALTH SVCS INFO SYSTEMS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTB HEALTH SVCS INFO SYSTEMS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTB HEALTH SVCS INFO SYSTEMS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 LBTB HEALTH SVCS INFO SYSTEMS SPEC 40 ZB5-1541 $6,542 - $8,768 6555 VCFB HEALTH SVCS INFO TECH SUPV 40 ZA5-1884 $9,189 - $12,314 6555 LBFA HS INFO TECH MANAGER 40 ZB5-2093 $11,301 - $13,737 6555 LBFA HS INFO TECH MANAGER 40 ZB5-2093 $11,301 - $13,737 6555 LBFA HS INFO TECH MANAGER 40 ZB5-2093 $11,301 - $13,737 6555 LBFA HS INFO TECH MANAGER 40 ZB5-2093 $11,301 - $13,737 6555 LBVB HS IT CLINICAL SYS ANALYST I 40 ZB5-2042 $10,745 - $11,846 6555 LBVB HS IT CLINICAL SYS ANALYST I 40 ZB5-2042 $10,745 - $11,846 6555 LBTE HS IT CLINICAL SYS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-2142 $11,863 - $13,079 6555 LBTE HS IT CLINICAL SYS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-2142 $11,863 - $13,079 6555 LBTE HS IT CLINICAL SYS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-2142 $11,863 - $13,079 6555 LBGF HS IT PROJECT MANAGER 40 ZB5-2093 $11,301 - $13,737 6555 LBSD HS IT SECURITY SPECIALIST 40 ZB5-1884 $9,189 - $12,314 6555 LBWC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST I 40 ZB5-1595 $6,902 - $9,249 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LBVC HS SYSTEMS ANALYST II 40 ZB5-1784 $8,322 - $11,153 6555 LPNA INFO SYS PROJECT MANAGER 40 ZA5-1884 $9,189- $12,314 6555 LWWA SYSTEMS SOFTWARE ANALYST I 40 ZB5-1787 $8,347 - $11,186 6567 JDTD ACCOUNT CLERK-ADVANCED LEVEL 40 3RX-1133 $4,357 - $5,564 6567 JDTD ACCOUNT CLERK-ADVANCED LEVEL 40 3RX-1133 $4,357 - $5,564 6567 JDVC ACCOUNT CLERK-EXPERIENCED LVL 20 3RH-0755 $3,924 - $4,864 6567 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6567 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6567 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6567 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6567 JD7A ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 40 3RX-1236 $4,825 - $6,161 6567 JWXC CLERK-SENIOR LEVEL 40 3RX-1033 $3,946 - $5,039 6567 VANG HEALTH SVCS ADMIN-LEVEL B 40 ZB2-1323 $5,432 - $8,901 6598 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 28 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6598 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6598 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6598 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 6598 1KVD INST SVCS WORKER-GENERALIST 40 TB5-0922 $3,544 - $4,308 TOTAL FTE = 219.18 TOTAL POS COUNT = 232 Page 4 of 4 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26116 DATE 1/31/2023 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. A-18 Org No. vary Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add 232 positions in varied represented classifications in the Health Services Department as outlined in Attachment A. Proposed Effective Date: 2/8/2023 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $38,998,313 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Various Department revenues, no County General Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 2/2/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 2/2/2023 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26116 to add 232 positions for a total of 219.18 Full Time Equivalent positions in varied classifications (represented) for the Detention, Public Health, Alcohol and Other Drugs, Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP), and Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers (CCRMC/HC) divisions in the Health Services Department as outlined in Attachment A. FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, the total salary and benefit cost for the Health Services Department will increase by approximately $39 million, which includes approximately $6 million in pension cost. The cost increase will be offset in the budget by a vacancy factor with no impact to the general fund subsidy. The cost breakdown by division is as follows: Health Services Division Position Count FTE Count Salary Cost Health, Dental, and other Salary and Benefits Cost Pension Cost Total CCRMC/HC 186.00 173.38 22,101,700 6,406,669 5,185,501 33,693,870 CC Health Plan 16.00 16.00 1,113,745 478,584 261,307 1,853,637 Public Health 15.00 15.00 960,015 447,081 225,239 1,632,335 AODS 10.00 9.80 630,842 292,498 148,008 1,071,349 Detention 5.00 5.00 468,940 168,159 110,023 747,123 Total 232.00 219.18 $25,275,243 $7,792,992 $5,930,078 $38,998,313 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Linh Huynh, Kathi Caudel C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Add 232 positions in varied classifications in the Health Services Department FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) The department is submitting fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 baseline and recommended budgets that include these positions. The positions when filled will be fully funded by various funding sources within the divisions, which include third party-revenue, increasing Medi-Cal reimbursements due to benefit expansions and the transition of Contra Costa Health Plan to a single plan model that will offset some of the costs for CCRMC/HC, CCHP and Behavioral Health, and reductions to registry, temporary employee, and overtime expenditures when permanent staff are hired into the positions. The addition of these positions will not require any change to the department’s existing budgeted County subsidy. BACKGROUND: The County Administrator’s Office advised Department Heads of the County’s transition to a position level budgeting and control that tracks authority for full-time equivalent (FTE) positions by department and job class. Departments obtain operationally necessary position authority through the annual budget process or by obtaining Board approval through Position Adjustment Resolutions. The Health Services Department has obtained position authority by both processes, while also maintaining the vacant unfunded positions that are typically eliminated through the budget process or administratively. During the initial phase of the FY 2023-2024 budget development process, Health Services and the County Administrator’s Office worked through solutions to address the approximate 478 vacant FTEs the department unfunded during prior budget development cycles yet maintained in the position system of record (PeopleSoft). In December, the department identified a total of 80.97 vacant unfunded FTEs for elimination within the Public Health (36.68 FTE), California Children's Services (0.5 FTE), Mental Health (4.0 FTE), and CCRMC/HC (39.79 FTE) divisions. The department further reviewed their vacant unfunded positions during the salary and benefit forecasting budget activities for FY 2023-24 and identified 325.17 FTE in CCRMC/HC for elimination. This resulted in a total FTE count of 406.17 to be eliminated departmentwide. The amount of FTE eliminations submitted by the department were done in error due to a misunderstanding over the revised process of handling unfunded vacant positions. Traditionally, vacant positions were removed from the department's recommended budget but remained available in PeopleSoft for the department’s immediate use as needed to address conversion of registry staff to permanent employment; filling positions to decrease the need for costly overtime; and hiring temporary and contractors on a permanent basis to address service level demands. Hiring permanent staff to fill these positions was always contingent on identified cost savings or the availability of external funding sources. The department has determined there is a need to retain a portion of the previously eliminated positions in order to meet its operational needs. Accordingly, the department is submitting the attached Position Adjustment Resolution with a list of the 232 positions to be added for a total of 219.18 FTEs. The Board’s approval will provide the position authority the department has requested of the County Administrator’s Office and will eliminate position and FTE discrepancies currently in PeopleSoft due to the significant volume of vacant unfunded positions the department had previously maintained. Additionally, the department is engaging with County administrative staff to move forward with a more appropriate position management and control approach, which establishes vacancy factors within the budget to account for attrition and acknowledgment of the various staffing approaches the department utilizes to maintain operationally necessary staffing levels. Approval of this request will allow the department to utilize the positions necessary for on-going operations and will require no change to the department’s existing budgeted County subsidy. As the department continues to engage in position reconciliation activities within its various divisions, it may bring further Position Adjustment Resolutions to the Board for consideration. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There will not be sufficient positions to meet the operational demands which adversely affect patient care services in Contra Costa. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 2616 HSD P300 No. 26116 Attachment A MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26116 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26050 DATE 7/11/2022 Department No./ Department Department of Information Technology Budget Unit No. 0147 Org No. 1055 Agency No. Action Requested: Establish (1) Information Systems Security Specialist Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $0.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT User departments are charged Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sarah Bunnell ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Jason Chan 9/30/22 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 1/17/2023 Establish the classification of Information Security Specialist (LWSC)(represented) at salary plan and grade ZB5 1884 ($9,189 - $12,314) and add (1) one position in the Department of Information Technology. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 1/17/2023 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 2/3/2023 No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Resolution No. 26050 to establish the classification of Information Security Specialist (LWSC)(represented) at salary plan and grade ZB5 1884 ($9,189 - $12,314) and add one Information Security Specialist (LWSC) position in the Department of Information Technology. FISCAL IMPACT: The annual cost of this action is $214,264. The cost will be covered through charges to user departments. BACKGROUND: In November of 2021 the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury released report 2104 titled “Cyber Attack Preparedness In Contra Costa County” discussing challenges facing the County as we face ever-increasing information security threats. The security strategy calls for the implementation of baseline security controls throughout the organization to address many of the risks highlighted in the report. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Bunnell, (925) 608-4023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marc Shorr, Chief Information Officer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Establish the classification of Information Security Specialist BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The implementation of the security strategy requires appropriately qualified personnel to operate information technology security systems, programs, and respond to cybersecurity incidents throughout the organization. Establishing the Information Security Specialist will adequately staff the Security Team. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this were not approved the Security Team would not be sufficiently staffed. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AIR 50320 P300 26050 Establish Info Security Specialist Local 21 Union Notice DL to repond by 1-23-23 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26050 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Delegation of Leases and Licenses dated July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, to lease real property for use by the County or to obtain the use of real property for the County by license and to amend real property leases or licenses to permit improvements or alterations, or both, under certain circumstances, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Contra Costa County, Ordinance Code, Title 11, Division 1108, Chapter 1108-10.002, the Board of Supervisors authorizes the Public Works Director, or designee, to perform all acts necessary to lease or license real property for use by the County if the term does not exceed five years and the rent does not exceed $7,500 per month, and to amend real property leases or licenses to permit improvements or alterations, or both, under the following conditions: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessica Dillingham, (925) 957-2453 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept the 2022 Semi-Annual Report of Real Estate Delegation of Leases and Licenses dated July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) (1) the total cost under an amendment may not exceed $7,500; (2) an amendment may not extend the term of the lease or license; and (3) no more than two amendments, not to exceed $7,500 each, may be made within a 12-month period. The Public Works Director shall submit a semi-annual report to the Board of Supervisors on each lease or license done pursuant to this section, including the interest acquired, its price, and the necessity for the lease or license. There are no Leases or Licenses to report for the period of July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors would not be informed of the leases and licenses accepted by the Public Works Director pursuant to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 05/24/2022 by the following vote: AYE: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/182 In The Matter Of: California Department of Aging contract agreement HI-2122-07 Amendment #1. WHEREAS: Federal State Insurance Program (SHIP) grant funds allocated to support HICAP advocacy services to eligible older adult and adults with disabilities; and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Department, Area Agency on Aging received funding from the California Department of Aging for HICAP services to provide direct or contracted services to Medicare beneficiaries; and WHEREAS, HICAP will provide advocacy, counseling, education and outreach services to eligible Medicare beneficiaries living in Contra Costa County. Specific population to include: older adults 60 years and above, adults with disability, low-income, limited English-proficient, ethnic minorities and groups difficult to reach; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Aging has allocated revenue for program staffing, training HICAP counselors, performance and management to cover contract requirements to bolster the HICAP Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approves and authorizes the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute contract agreement HI-2122-07 amendment #1 with the California Department of Aging, to receive increased funding of $649,157 to a new total not to exceed $1,019,500, for HICAP services for the period July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. Contact: L. Pacheco (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: May 24, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/18 In The Matter Of: California Department of Aging contract agreement HI-2122-07 Amendment #2. WHEREAS, The County is to receive an additional $3,788 from the California Department of Aging for contract agreement HI-2122-07 Amendment #2 for the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP); and WHEREAS, Funding is 29% federal ($296,005) and 71% state ($727,283) funds; and WHEREAS, Funding for HICAP comes from the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) federal funds via Administration for Community Living (ACL) and other State funds, which include the State HICAP Fund and California Department of Insurance reimbursement allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approves and authorizes the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute contract amendment with the California Department of Aging, to receive increased funding of $3,788 to a new total not to exceed $1,023,288, for HICAP services for the period July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. Contact: L. Pacheco (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Resolution No. 2023/18 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute contract agreement HI-2122-07 amendment #2 with the California Department of Aging to accept a funding increase in the amount of $3,788 to a new agreement amount not to exceed $1,023,288 for Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program for the period July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an additional $3,788 from the California Department of Aging for contract agreement HI-2122-07 for the Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP). Term of this agreement is from July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. The total funding under this agreement is not to exceed $1,023,288. Period July 1, 2022 - June 30, 2023 is budgeted in FY 2022-23 and period July 1, 2023 - March 31, 2024 will be budgeted in FY 2023-24. Funding is 29% Federal ($296,005) and 71% State ($727,283) funds. Funding for HICAP comes from federal State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) grant funds and State funds, which include the State HICAP Fund and California Department of Insurance reimbursement allocations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. Pacheco (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement HI-2122-07 Amendment #2 Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP) BACKGROUND: The Area Agency on Aging (AAA), a division in EHSD’s Aging and Adult Services Bureau, is the direct service provider of HICAP in Contra Costa County. On June 8, 2021, the Board of Supervisors accepted Resolution No. 2021/172 authorizing the EHSD Director to sign Agreement No. HI-2122-07 with the California Department of Aging (CDA) to deliver HICAP services with funding not to exceed $370,343 for contracting period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022. Resolution No. 2022/182 approved by the Board on May 24, 2022 authorized the EHSD Director to sign Amendment #1 to this agreement, increasing funding to a new amount not to exceed $1,019,500 with a new contract period of July 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. EHSD is seeking Board approval to authorize the EHSD Director, or designee, to sign Amendment #2 to agreement HI-2122-7 and accept the funding increase of $3,788 to a new contract amount not to exceed $1,023,288. The contract period of July 1, 2021 to March 31, 2024 remains the same. HICAP serves Medicare beneficiaries aged 60 years and older as well as adults with disabilities in Contra Costa County. Services include advocacy, counseling, education, and assistance to better understand Medicare options and enroll in programs to lower health care costs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding for HICAP, Medicare eligible beneficiaries in Contra Costa would be without an agency to provide no-cost, impartial and supportive Medicare advocacy services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/18 Resolution 2022/182 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/18 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Participation Agreement #28-300-10 with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), to replace current Standard Agreement #28-300-7 (and subsequent Amendment #28-300-9) as required by DHCS and allow the County to continue to participate in the County-Based Medi-Cal Administrative Activities (CMAA) Program and receive reimbursement for these services, effective July 1, 2021 and continuing until terminated by either party with 30-day advanced notice. FISCAL IMPACT: Under this participation agreement DHCS will reimburse the County for actual quarterly CMAA expenditures incurred in accordance with the allowable costs. Reimbursements of up to $27,000,000 may be received by the County under the current agreement. The County will pay a participation fee not to exceed $200,000 to cover the cost of administering the program including, but not limited to, claims processing, technical assistance and monitoring. No County match is required. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5410 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Participation Agreement #28-300-10 with the California Department of Health Care Services BACKGROUND: The DHCS is responsible for administering the CMAA Program which is authorized by Title 42, United States Code Section 1396 and Welfare and Institutions Code Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000) and Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200). The Federal Social Security Act mandates cooperative arrangements between the single state agency and participating local government agencies (LGA’s) responsible for providing health related administrative activities. The goal of this agreement is to ensure that Contra Costa County Medi-Cal potentially eligible individuals and their families are appropriately informed of the Medi-Cal Program, how to access it, and assisted in accessing the CMAA services. On March 9, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #28-300-7 with the DHCS in an amount no to exceed $27,000,000 for the Medi-Cal Administrative Activities Program, for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. On June 21, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement Amendment #28-300-9 with DHCS to revise contract language for clarification purposes, update existing exhibits and add a new exhibit for continuation of the County’s Health Services Department for the CMAA Program, through June 30, 2024. This agreement is being processed late because the documents were not received by the Health Services Department from DHCS until November 29, 2022. Approval of this Participation Agreement #28-300-10 will replace Standard Agreement #28-300-7 (and subsequent Amendment #28-300-9) and allow the County to continue to participate in the CMAA Program and receive reimbursement for these services. This agreement includes agreeing to indemnify the DHCS for any claims arising out of the County’s performance under the agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not be able to partner with DHCS for their administration of CMAA Program and for the County to be reimbursed for CMAA expenditures. ATTACHMENTS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/31 IN THE MATTER OF: Applying for and Accepting a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety. WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa is seeking funds available through the State of California Office of Traffic Safety. NOW, THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: Authorize the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff of the Sheriff's Commander, Management Services, to execute for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining State financial assistance including grant modification and extensions provided by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Grant. Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/31 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety in an initial amount of $450,000 for the Sheriff's Forensic Services Unit to purchase new updated instrumentation for the blood alcohol program beginning October 1, 2023 to the end of the grant period. FISCAL IMPACT: Initial revenue of $450,000, 100% State funds. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County, Office of the Sheriff, Forensic Services Division (FSD) operates an ISO 17025 ANAB Accredited Crime Laboratory able to provide County-wide Forensic Toxicological testing services. The FSD’s Toxicology Unit is responsible for the analysis of blood and urine evidence for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) cases. The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant funds are needed to ensure efficient processing and analysis of DUID-related offenses. The OTS Grant funds will be used to purchase a new updated instrumentation for detection of alcohol and other volatile substances. New updated testing equipment will allow the FSD to meet current accreditation and state (Title 17) guidelines. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:State of California Office of Traffic Safety Grant CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the new updated instrumentation, some requests for analysis will be sent to an accredited outside laboratory. Analysis performed by an outside laboratory creates an increase burden and cost to Contra Costa County law enforcement agencies and the District Attorney's Office when the case is prosecuted. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/31 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Sigend Resolution No. 2023/31 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of Pittsburg to pay the County an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to provide police dispatching services for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2027. FISCAL IMPACT: No Net County Cost. $8,000,000 revenue over five years. BACKGROUND: The Office of the Sheriff will provide police dispatching services, limited to law enforcement activity for the City of Pittsburg. Services will include dispatching, call-taking, sending and receiving voice and data traffic, answering emergency (911) calls and warrant checks to aid the the city's Police Department. This agreement includes a provision for mutual indemnificaiton between the City of Pittsburg and the County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this contract will result in the inability of the Sheriff's Office to provide the City of Pittsburg with adequate 911 Dispatcher Services resulting in a safety concern for the community, reduced revenue for the Office of the Sheriff and the County General Fund. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Abigail Balana, 925-655-0008 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Police Dispatching Services THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/34 In The Matter Of: 2022-2023 California Department of Education (CDE) State Preschool Program Contract Amendment 1 WHEREAS: on August 9, 2022, the Board approved Board Order (C.26) to accept funds for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the continuation of Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) preschool services, and WHEREAS, the County receives funds from CDE to provide preschool services to program-eligible families for children ages 3-5 years old, and WHEREAS, eligible families must meet at least one of these eligibility criteria: receiving cash-aid, income eligible, experiencing homelessness, or recipients of protective services or at risk of being abused, neglected or exploited, and WHEREAS, for Full-Day services, families must have an established need for child care in addition to meeting eligibility criteria, and WHEREAS, the program is operated by the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau (CSB), and WHEREAS, during Fiscal Year 2022-2023, approximately 1,098 families and 1,163 children received preschool services throughout the County, and WHEREAS, the California Department of Education notified EHSD on November 15, 2022 of the contract amendment for 2022-2023 of the California State Preschool program services, and WHEREAS, this Board Order is to accept additional funds for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for EHSD to continue providing preschool services. Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved: the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a revenue contract amendment with the California Department of Education to accept a funding increase of $5,974,470 with a new payment limit of $22,398,601 for state preschool services for the term July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Contact: CSB 925-681-6389 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Theodore Trinh, Tracy Lewis, Nathalie Cetoute RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a revenue contract amendment with the California Department of Education (CDE) to accept a funding increase of $5,974,470 with a new payment limit of $22,398,601 for state preschool services for the term July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: $22,398,601 is 100% State funded by the California Department of Education (CDE), all of which is budgeted in FY 2022-2023. No County match is required. State Contract Number: CSPP-2051-01 County Contract Number: 39-908-39 BACKGROUND: On August 9, 2022, the Board approved Board Order (C.26) to accept funds for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the continuation of EHSD preschool services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB 925-681-6389 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Theodore Trinh, Tracy Lewis, Nathalie Cetoute C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:2022-2023 California Department of Education State Preschool Program Contract Amendment 1 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The County receives funds from CDE to provide preschool services to program-eligible families for children ages 3-5 years old. Eligible families must meet at least one of these eligibility criteria: receiving cash-aid, income eligible, experiencing homelessness, or recipients of protective services or at risk of being abused, neglected or exploited. For Full-Day services, families must have an established need for child care in addition to meeting eligibility criteria. The program is operated by the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD), Community Services Bureau (CSB). During Fiscal Year 2022-2023, approximately 1,098 families and 1,163 children received preschool services throughout the County. The California Department of Education notified EHSD on November 15, 2022 of the contract amendment for 2022-2023 of the California State Preschool program services. This Board Order is to accept additional funds for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for EHSD to continue providing preschool services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, Contra Costa residents eligible to receive these services will not receive preschool services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/34 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/34 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Agreement #78-022 with Mt. Diablo Unified School District (MDUSD), a government agency, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $30,000 for the implementation and evaluation of Public Health Curriculum in the Patient Care Pathways program at College Park High School, Mt. Diablo High School, and Ygnacio Valley High School for the period February 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will result in a total payment to the County of up to $30,000. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Implementation and evaluation of Public Health Curriculum in the Patient Care Pathways program will increase underrepresented youth access to healthcare careers and increase representation in public health and clinical careers for students in Central Contra Costa County by connecting them to mentorship and internships. For the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 school years, County staff will provide curriculum instruction with at least 75 MDUSD high school health academy students. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzielli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #78-022 with Mt. Diablo Unified School District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) County staff will support classroom facilitation, teacher support activities, college and career-focused events, and the scheduling and monitoring of summer internships including internship curriculum and events, group and individual intern success support hours, and final project development assistance. Approval of Agreement #78-022 will allow the County to receive funds from MDUSD for the Public Health Patient Care Pathways program for the period February 1, 2023 through July 31, 2024. This agreement includes agreeing to indemnify and hold harmless MDUSD from any claims arising out of the performance of this agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the County will not receive funds for the Public Health Patient Care Pathways program. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment #28-706-27 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, to amend Agreement #28-706-26, to increase the amount payable to the County by $27,061, from $137,813 to a new amount not to exceed $164,874 for participation in the California Emerging Infections Program (EIP) with no change in the term of September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in an additional amount not to exceed $27,061 in funding by Food and Drug Administration Grant for the Emerging Infections Program through the Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (No County match required) BACKGROUND: The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for Enteric Bacteria was established in 1996 to monitor bacterial resistance, specifically, the resistance among Salmonella and other enteric bacteria. The 17 participating state health departments forward every tenth human Salmonella isolate to Center for Disease Control (CDC) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzielli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #28-706-27 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The CDC is requesting that additional EIP sites participate in the study of foodborne bacteria. Such bacteria is not uncommon and often is associated with the use of antimicrobial agents in food animals, especially in retail food. This study will assist in generating a database that may be utilized to augment the development of intervention programs to stem the high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the meal and poultry food supply. The goal of the study is to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella, Campylobacter, E.coli and enterococci isolated from a sample of chicken, ground turkey, ground beef and pork chops purchased from selected grocery stores in the catchment area of the California EIP FoodNet site. This will include samples collected from Contra Costa, Alameda and San Francisco County retail grocery stores. On November 29, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #28-706-26 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. to pay the County an amount not to exceed $137,813 for participation in the California EIP Program for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023. This agreement included mutual indemnification. Approval of Amendment #28-706-27 will allow the County to receive additional funding to support the EIP - Retail Foods Project, through August 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not receive additional funding to continue provide services for the EIP. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept on behalf of the County Grant Agreement #28-640-13, and ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/33 authorizing the County to request an allocation from Metropolitan Transportation Commission, in an amount not to exceed $40,000, for the County’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Project for the period July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this agreement will result in a total grant of $40,000 for FY 2023/2024 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission. ($23,231 In-Kind County match, budgeted) BACKGROUND: Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrian and bicyclists. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency of the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 875, which delineates procedures APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Agreement #28-640-13 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and criteria for submission of requests for the allocations of TDA Article 3 countywide coordinated claim is required to submit a resolution from its governing body to MTC requesting an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds. The County’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Project goal is to provide safe walking and biking education by providing classroom education; assemblies, information tables, and school events; bicycle helmet distribution; educational materials; and facilitated bicycling and walking events. Contra Costa County has been applying for and receiving funds for this Grant since 1999. On February 22, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Agreement #28-640-10 with Metropolitan Transportation Commission, in an amount of $40,000 for the Bicycle Pedestrian Safety Project, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Approval of the Grant Agreement #28-640-13 will allow the County to continue providing bicycle and pedestrian education services through June 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant agreement is not accepted, additional bicycle and pedestrian safety projects would be delayed or not carried out. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/33 Attachment A Attachment B RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept Grant Award Extension #28-994-1 (State Award Number CERI-21-23-08) with the State of California Health and Human Services Agency, California Department of Public Health (CDPH), to extend the termination date from June 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024 with no change in the original amount payable to the County not to exceed $895,271, for the California Equitable Recovery Initiative (CERI) to address COVID-19 health disparities among populations at high-risk and underserved. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no change the original amount awarded to the County of $895,271 from the CDPH. No county match required. BACKGROUND: The CERI funds are intended to address COVID-19 and advance health equity through strategies, interventions, and services that consider systemic barriers and potentially discriminatory practices that have put certain groups at higher risk for diseases like COVID-19 for disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic groups, rural populations, those experiencing socioeconomic disparities, and other underserved communities APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-957-2670 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award Extension #28-994-1 with the State of California Department of Public Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) within state and local health jurisdictions. On May 3, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Award #28-994 with CDPH, to pay the County in an amount not to exceed $895,271, to implement strategies that better position the department to meet COVID-19 response and recovery needs and prioritize and target resources to those most vulnerable to the impacts of the pandemic, for the period from September 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023. This Grant Award Extension #28-994-1 will allow the County to continue to address COVID-19 health disparities among populations at high-risk and underserved through May 31, 2024. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and, if selected, accept California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant funds, in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program for a countywide Vision Zero roadway safety education campaign, for the period from October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this request will result in the department applying for, and if selected, accepting up to $100,000 in OTS funding. This grant funding is made available to OTS by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Unlike those traveling in vehicles with seat belts, air bags and other safety features, bicyclists and pedestrians do not have the same level of protection and are more vulnerable every time they are on the road. In California, pedestrian fatalities rose 26% between 2014 and 2018. California’s pedestrian fatality APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D. 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Submission of Application #78-024 to the California Office of Traffic Safety BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) rate is almost 25% higher than the national average. There has been a greater than 60% increase in bicyclists killed per year since 2010. OTS provides grant funding made available to California by NHTSA, for innovative, evidence-based education and enforcement programs and technologies designed to make California’s roadways safer. The Health Services Department requests approval to submit an application for the Vision Zero roadway safety education campaign and accept funding through September 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to apply or receive the funding from OTS to provide a countywide Vision Zero roadway safety education campaign that will result in safer roadway behaviors, reducing risk of serious injuries and deaths. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The recommendation supports the following children's outcome: Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director or designee, to accept on behalf of the County Grant Award #78-023 from the State of California Department of Justice for the Tobacco Grant Program funds, in an amount not to exceed $442,692 for the period from December 1, 2022 through July 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this award will result in an amount not to exceed $442,692 for the 34 month grant term. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Funding from the California Department of Justice Tobacco Grant Program will be utilized to educate enforcement agencies about tobacco control policies with the overarching goal of increasing tobacco retailer compliance. Tobacco Prevention Program (TPP) staff will increase local enforcement agencies awareness of existing tobacco control policies, as well as any policy changes that may occur throughout the duration of the grant through outreach and education. TPP staff will also work to strengthen the capacity of local agencies to enforce tobacco control policies through trainings on emerging tobacco trends and facilitate workgroups where best practices in tobacco policy enforcement can be discussed and agency staff can share their experiences and learn from one another. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-957-2670 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award #78-023 from the State of California Department of Justice BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Health Services Department received a notice of award from the California Department of Public Health on November 21, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to receive the funding from the State of California Department of Justice, to increase the ability of local enforcement agencies to enforce tobacco retail policies in Contra Costa County potentially leading to non-compliance of tobacco retailers and an increased ability of youth to access tobacco products. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This recommendation supports the following children's outcome(s): Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; and Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a Grant Award #28-637-30 with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), effective January 18, 2023, to increase the amount payable to the County by $13,066, from $62,868 to a new total of $75,934 for the Ryan White, Part C, HIV Early Intervention Services Program with no change in the original term of May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this grant award will result in additional funds to the County of $13,066 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HRSA. No County match required. BACKGROUND: West Contra Costa County has been hard hit by the AIDS epidemic with 25% of those living with AIDS residing in the City of Richmond. Unfortunately, a large percentage of those living with HIV/AIDS are of low income having to rely on Basic Health Care (BHC) for their medical care, or forced to pay for their medical care, because they do not qualify for BHC services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award #28-637-31 with the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (Health Resources & Services Administration) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The County’s AIDS Program works closely with other staff in Public Health Division, physicians and medical social workers at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, community-based partners, and private providers throughout the County to reduce the transmission of HIV, improve access to health care, and to enhance quality of life for those with HIV. Contra Costa County has been awarded this grant since 1999. On July 12, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Award #28-637-30 with HRSA, to pay the County in an amount not to exceed $62,868, for the Ryan White, Part C, HIV Early Intervention Services Program, for the period from May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. This grant award was received by the Health Services Department on January 18, 2023. This is the Department’s first opportunity to notify the Board of Supervisors. Approval of Grant Award #28-637-31 will allow the County’s AIDS Program to receive additional funding to provide outpatient medical services to low-income HIV positive recipients in West Contra Costa County through April 30, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant is not approved, the County will not receive funds to assist the low-income HIV positive recipients in West Contra Costa County with outpatient medical services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls to apply for the second round of the Women's Recovery Response Grant from the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls in an amount to not exceed $35,000 to provide support for the Commission and services to the women and girls in Contra Costa County for the period April 3, 2023 through March 31, 2024. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, on behalf of the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls, to accept the funding from the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls in the amount of $35,000 if awarded for the Women's Recovery Response Grant for the period April 3, 2023 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% state funding from the California Commission for the Status of Women and Girls. No County match required. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Commission for Women and Girls (CCCWG) was formed in 1984 to educate the community and advise the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on issues relating to the changing social and economic conditions of women and girls in the county, with particular emphasis on the economically disadvantaged. The Commission's mission is to improve the economic status, social welfare, and overall quality of life for women and girls in Contra Costa County. The Commission shall provide information and advice to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and other entities, as necessary, relating to the health and welfare of women and girls in the county. The Commission will strive to increase awareness of women’s and girls’ issues, celebrate the achievements of local deserving women, champion opportunities for women and girls, and recommend legislative solutions at the city, county, state and federal levels. Areas of focus will include, but are not limited to, socio-economic conditions, workplace issues, social treatment of gender issues, and health and safety for women and girls. On January 23, 2023, the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls announced the second round of the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, (925) 655-2057 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Application for Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Women’s Recovery Response Grant funding opportunity, bringing up to $5 million of state funds to local communities for the direct support of organizations serving women economically impacted by the pandemic. The California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls notes: "As we grapple with the long-term consequences and persistent challenges of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial that women across the state, in all industries and localities, receive the support they need. The Commission is currently accepting grant applications from nonprofits, direct service providers, local women’s commissions, intermediary organizations, and governmental entities. The Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls has considered and intends to apply for the opportunity to support women and girls in our community. These grants will supply structural support and resources to local communities and will engage a network of local leaders while the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls continues to serve as a statewide convener, facilitator, and administrator." With up to $5 million available, the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls will award funds ranging from $25,000 to $250,000 maximum. CCSWG will prioritize grant activities in the following areas, which may include, but are not limited to: Improving access and affordability of child and/or elder care services; Increasing the utilization and uptake of safety-net programs that offer services to support basic needs such as shelter, food, clothing, etc.; Achieving reskilling/upskilling through accreditation, certification, vocational or educational programs; and Enhancing financial ability to grow economic security, assets, and wealth-building. Application materials are due by 4:00 p.m. PST on February 17, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Contra Costa County Commission for Women and Girls will not receive the second round of California State Women’s Recovery Response Grant funding, reducing local services to women and girls who have been disproportionately affected economically by the ongoing pandemic. Pilot Priority Production Area Grant Application Multi-Jurisdiction PPA Technical Assistance (TA) (maximum award $750,000) Technical Assistance grants are for projects focused on developing shared analyses or frameworks for implementing programs/policies across multiple PPAs. It is expected that multi-jurisdiction TA grants will provide the feasibility analysis, framework, and template materials necessary for local staff to get PPA-related programs or policies adopted. 3. Project Title: Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project 4. Provide a brief one-sentence description of the project The Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project (“The Project”) is the identification and implementation of common tools for infrastructure improvements across multiple Priority Production Areas (PPAs) of the County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, City of Pittsburg, City of Antioch, and City of Oakley. 5. What is the grant funding amount being requested? $750,000 6. In each row below please identify each partnering jurisdiction, contact person and email. 1. Contra Costa County, Alyson Greenlee, alyson.greenlee@dcd.cccounty.us 2. City of Concord, Marie Suvansin, Marie.Suvansin@cityofconcord.org 3. City of Pittsburg, Jordan Davis, jdavis@pittsburgca.gov 4. City of Antioch, Kwame Reed, kreed@ci.antioch.ca.us 5. City of Oakley, Harumi Murata, Murata@ci.oakley.ca.us 7. Name of PPA(s) served by this project. (See this map for reference) 1. Pacheco Manufacturing Zone, Bay Point Industrial Sector 2. Northern Concord PPA, Western Concord PPA 3. Northern Waterfront (Pittsburg) 4. Northern Waterfront Industrial Corridor (Antioch) 5. Employment Area (Oakley) 8. Please upload a document addressing the following four questions: • Briefly describe the project, including the key tasks and deliverables. (max 300 words) The Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project (“The Project”) is the identification and implementation of common tools for infrastructure improvements across multiple Priority Production Areas (PPAs) of the County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, City of Pittsburg, City of Antioch, and City of Oakley. Advancing the multi-jurisdictional Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative--of which all these jurisdictions are a part--the Project will develop a shared analysis and toolkit with a direct path to adoption and implementation of infrastructure improvements. The Project’s key tasks and deliverables are the following: 1. The development of a shared inventory of industrial land within the PPAs across the Northern Waterfront of Contra Costa County. This task will develop, within each of the PPAs, an online searchable database of industrial zoned land that includes the number and size of parcels, vacant and underutilized sites, zoning, infrastructure capacity, rail service and deep-water access, and other information required by businesses and site selectors. 2. The development of an analysis of existing infrastructure capacity across the PPAs (utilities, etc.) This will include an assessment of the utilities supply and distribution infrastructure, power transmission and distribution infrastructure, water and sewer, broadband, and other infrastructure. This task will identify the expansions and upgrades that are needed to maintain an adequate supply of development-ready sites and support business growth. 3. The development and adoption of a common set of tools/template materials for local staff to get adopted to address infrastructure needs/gaps. These common template materials will include materials for implementing Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs). 4. The leveraging of the currently underway Resilient East Bay Industrial Land Use Analysis, and the implementation and adoption of the East Bay Industrial Land Use Toolkit in the County & cities. • How will the project have strategic impact? Does it advance Plan Bay Area 2050 economy and transportation strategies, create or protect PPA jobs, create benefits at regional/multi-jurisdiction scale, or establish innovative/replicable programs or policies? (max 150 words) The Project will have strategic impact in multiple ways. The goal of the Northern Waterfront Initiative is to create 18,000 new jobs by 2035, and this project helps advance that goal. This project leverages the multi-jurisdictional nature of the Northern Waterfront Initiative to create benefits at a regional/multi- jurisdictional scale. This project also has the potential to establish innovative/replicable programs or policies. Contra Costa County has an adopted policy on participating in Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs) with cities that are seeking financial partnership with the County (see attached), and this policy has not yet been utilized. Several cities are currently in the process of considering EIFDs and/or proposals to the County. This grant is a timely opportunity to explore the EIFD tool and to create shared templates that could turn into innovative/replicable programs or policies. • How is the project consistent with the county or local plans and policies? What is the project's alignment with countywide economic development strategies, applicable general land use elements, transportation plans, and any other applicable local plans and policies? Please confirm that the project will result in an adopted policy or planning document. (max 150 words) The Project aligns with the objectives of the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative Strategic Action Plan--of which Contra Costa County and the Cities of Concord, Pittsburg, Antioch, and Oakley are part-- to maintain an adequate supply of development-ready sites and make utility infrastructure improvements that are needed to support business growth. The Project also aligns with the City of Pittsburg Economic Development Strategic Plan, “Reinvest Antioch” Economic Development Strategic Plan, and the Update to the City of Oakley’s Economic Development Work Plan by facilitating investment in the key industrial districts that are designated PPAs and maintaining their long-term importance to the Northern Waterfront region. The Project will result in common template materials for the jurisdictions to get adopted and implemented as shown in the draft scope of work. • How will the grant increase opportunity? Does it achieve outcomes such as: Expand employment in a community with a jobs-housing imbalance, benefit low or moderate-resource communities, or meet a demonstrated funding need? (max 150 words) This grant will increase opportunity in Contra Costa County by expanding employment in a community with a jobs-housing imbalance. The Northern Waterfront has a severe jobs-housing imbalance, and the Initiative is to bring business to where talent lives among the robust labor forces within Pittsburg, Antioch, and Oakley. There exists 60% of the industrial land in Contra Costa County in the Northern Waterfront, and yet it is an older built environment with aging infrastructure. To meet the goal to create 18,000 new jobs by 2035 along the Northern Waterfront in emerging industries including regenerative industries that support a transition towards a zero-emission economy, autonomous vehicle manufacturing, prefabricated housing production, advanced transportation technology, maker spaces, clean technology, and even biomedical/biotechnology, this grant will provide special attention to the PPAs’ abilities to accommodate these industries with the infrastructure needed to support economic revitalization and create living-wage jobs. 9. Upload a draft scope of work and deliverables expected as part of this grant. (Please use this template format for your scope of work) Attached. 10. If available, upload supporting documentation, such as adopted economic development plans or studies, and policy resolutions that indicate how these PPAs and this application is integrated into a broader economic development strategy. Attachments: − Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative Strategic Action Plan − Contra Costa County Policy on Participating in Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts − City of Pittsburg Economic Development Strategic Plan − “Reinvest Antioch” Economic Development Strategic Plan − City of Oakley Economic Development Work Plan. SCOPE OF WORK NORTHERN WATERFRONT PRIORITY PRODUCTION AREAS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT Task 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT This task includes the overall project management of the delivery of the Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project (“The Project”) of the County of Contra Costa, City of Concord, City of Pittsburg, City of Antioch, and City of Oakley. • Project Stakeholder Management • Project Contract Management • Project Closeout. Task 1 Deliverables: 1.1: Project Meetings 1.2: Project Requests for Proposal, Contracts, and Related Materials 1.3: Project Adopted Deliverables. Task 2 – INVENTORY OF INDUSTRIAL LAND This task includes the inventory and development of an online searchable database of industrial zoned land across multiple Priority Production Areas (PPAs) that includes the number and size of parcels, vacant and underutilized sites, zoning, infrastructure capacity including utilities, rail service and deep- water access, and other information required by businesses and site selectors. • Identify Number and Size of Parcels • Identify Vacant and Underutilized Sites • Identify Zoning • Identify Infrastructure Capacity, Rail Service, Deep-Water Access, and Other Information Required by Businesses and Site Selectors • Develop Online Searchable Database for Use by Businesses and Site Selectors. Task 2 Deliverables: 2.1: Inventory of Industrial Zoned Land that Includes Number and Size of Parcels, Vacant and Underutilized Sites, Zoning, Infrastructure Capacity, Rail Service and Deep-Water Access, and Other Information Required by Businesses and Site Selectors 2.2: Online Searchable Database for Use by Businesses and Site Selectors. Task 3 – INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY ANALYSIS This task includes an assessment of infrastructure capacity across the PPAs (utilities, etc.). • Assess Infrastructure Capacity Across PPAs, Including: Utilities Supply and Distribution Infrastructure, Power Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure, Water and Sewer, Broadband, and Other Infrastructure • Identify Expansions and Upgrades Needed to Maintain Adequate Supply of Development-Ready Sites and Business Growth. Task 3 Deliverables: 3.1: Infrastructure Capacity Analysis 3.2: Recommended Expansions and Upgrades Needed to Support Business Growth. Task 4 – DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND TEMPLATE MATERIALS This task includes the development and adoption of a common set of tools/template materials across PPAs that when implemented address the recommended infrastructure expansions and upgrades. • Develop Common Set of Tools/Template Materials, Including Materials for Implementing Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs) • Work Across Jursidictions to Adopt Tools/Template Materials. Task 4 Deliverables: 4.1: Toolkit/Template Materials, Including for Implementing EIFDs 4.2: Adopted Materials. Task 5 – IMPLEMENTATION OF EAST BAY INDUSTRIAL LAND TOOLKIT This task includes leveraging the Resilient East Bay Industrial Land Use Analysis to implement and adopt the Toolkit. • Prepare to Implement the Resilient East Bay Industrial Land Toolkit • Adopt the Toolkit Across Jursidictions. Task 5 Deliverables: 5.1: Adopted Toolkit. SCHEDULE DELIVERABLE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION Task 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT August 31, 2026 1.1: Project Meetings August 31, 2026 1.2: Project Requests for Proposal, Contracts, and Related Materials August 31, 2026 1.3: Project Adopted Deliverables August 31, 2026 Task 2 - INVENTORY OF INDUSTRIAL LAND December 31, 2024 2.1: Inventory of Industrial Zoned Land that Includes Number and Size of Parcels, Vacant and Underutilized Sites, Zoning, Infrastructure Capacity, Rail Service and Deep-Water Access, and Other Information Required by Businesses and Site Selectors July 1, 2024 2.2: Online Searchable Database for Use by Businesses and Site Selectors December 31, 2024 Task 3 – INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY ANALYSIS December 31, 2024 3.1 Infrastructure Capacity Analysis July 1, 2024 3.2: Recommended Expansions and Upgrades Needed to Support Business Growth December 31, 2024 Task 4 – DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND TEMPLATE MATERIALS December 31, 2025 4.1: Toolkit/Template Materials, Including for Implementing EIFDs July 1, 2025 4.2: Adopted Materials December 31, 2025 Task 5 – IMPLEMENTATION OF EAST BAY INDUSTRIAL LAND TOOLKIT December 31, 2025 5.1 Adopted Toolkit December 31, 2025 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director, Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, to apply for and accept grant funding of up to $750,000 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project. FISCAL IMPACT: If awarded, the submission of the proposed grant materials is expected to result in a grant award of up to $750,000 from MTC to the Department of Conservation and Development to fund the technical assistance to support planning and infrastructure in the Priority Production Areas (PPAs) of the Northern Waterfront as described in this Board Order. There is no required match. BACKGROUND: On June 17, 2019, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) released an open call for letters of interest for a new pilot program that introduced Priority Production Areas (PPAs) as a new Priority Area designation. Priority Areas are specific locations well suited for a specific use and previously only included Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs). PPAs were based on new criteria developed by ABAG/MTC that called for the enhancement and protection of industrial areas. The intention of the pilot program was to protect and support the Bay Area’s industrial and manufacturing sectors through the provision of resources and implementation of streamlining actions. Thus, these PPAs are districts that are consistent with current land use designations, have the capacity to add jobs, and spur economic growth. On December 17, 2019, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2019/636, nominating two County districts in Bay Point and Pacheco as Association of Bay Area Governments/Metropolitan Transportation Commission's recognized Priority Production Areas, and supporting the City of Antioch's nomination of the Wilbur Avenue corridor, in order to establish eligibility for grant funding and other resources. At that point in the pilot program, there was no associated grant funding. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alyson Greenlee, 925-655-2783 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) In December 2022, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) released a solicitation for funding proposals for jurisdictions seeking planning grants and technical assistance for their Priority Production Areas (PPAs). The Priority Production Area (PPA) Pilot Program makes available technical assistance (TA) worth up to $750,000 for projects focused on developing shared analysis or frameworks for implementing programs/policies across multiple PPAs, with no match required. Given the multi-jurisdictional nature of the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, staff investigated opportunities with neighboring agencies for a collaborative approach in order to increase our chances of success. It is expected that multi-jurisdiction Technical Assistance (TA) grants will provide the feasibility analysis, framework, and template materials necessary for local staff to get PPA-related programs or policies adopted. The Northern Waterfront Priority Production Areas Technical Assistance Project (“The Project”) is the identification and implementation of common tools for infrastructure improvements across multiple Priority Production Areas (PPAs) in the Northern Waterfront, namely those in the County and in the Cities of Concord, Pittsburg, Antioch and Oakley. The four cities are supportive of the County's proposal. The grant materials are being submitted to the Board with sufficient time to seek approval from the Board of Supervisors prior to the submittal deadline of February 23, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failing to submit will prevent the Department of Conservation and Development from receiving a grant award for technical assistance from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to support the planning and infrastructure in the Priority Production Areas (PPAs) of the Northern Waterfront. ATTACHMENTS Draft Application RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute an amended subcontract agreement, effective December 31, 2022, with the Association of Bay Area Governments, to extend the term through December 31, 2023 and increase the payment limit from the California Public Utilities Commission to the County by $284,570 to a new payment limit of $1,146,680 to support marketing, education, and outreach for energy efficiency programs. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no impact to the General Fund. The CPUC funding allocated is expected to cover all costs incurred to support the Bay Area Regional Energy Network (BayREN) program. No County matching funds are required. BACKGROUND: In July 2012, the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing the Bay Area Regional Energy Network (BayREN), a collaborative partnership among the nine Bay Area counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma Counties) and led by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), for the purpose of facilitating the implementation of energy efficiency programs throughout the Bay Area. On May 5, 2015, a Restated and Revised MOU was approved by the County to better define the roles and responsibilities of ABAG and the counties participating in BayREN. In late 2012, the CPUC approved BayREN as a pilot program (effective January 1, 2013) to implement Energy Efficiency (EE) Programs for the purpose of filling gaps in EE Program activities not being offered by the Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs, such as Pacific Gas and Electric) or Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs, such as MCE). Since 2013, all BayREN counties have been receiving CPUC funding each calendar year to provide marketing, education and outreach for various EE Programs offered through BayREN. On June 5, 2018, the CPUC issued a decision (D. 18-05-41) that, among other things, approved the BayREN business plan with a BayREN budget increase of approximately $5.8 Million and allocated a similar amount of funding each year thereafter through calendar year 2025. To reduce the uncertainty about whether Regional Energy Networks (RENs) should continue as a APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Demian Hardman-Saldana, (925) 655-2816 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Amended Bay Area Regional Energy Network Funding and Implementation Agreement between Association of Bay Area Governments and County BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) concept, the CPUC also issued a decision (D.1 9-12-021) on December 12, 2019, that removed the "pilot" designation for all RENs across the State and established a process for creating new RENs. The business plan allows BayREN to design and implement EE Programs for residential and commercial buildings, as well as activities related to energy code compliance. The residential and commercial programs offer free technical services and financial incentives (rebates) if owners/contractors make specific energy efficiency improvements to existing single-family, multi-family or commercial buildings. Also included is a green labeling program that provides incentives to homeowners and participating contractors to offer a home energy score to interested single-family homeowners. The Building Codes and Standards subprogram provides, among other things, resources and trainings to support local government officials with building energy code compliance and enforcement. Continued implementation and expansion of these energy efficiency programs are consistent with the County's Climate Action Plan adopted in 2015. To continue to receive CPUC funds to support BayREN EE Programs throughout Contra Costa County, a subcontract agreement between ABAG and Contra Costa County was executed on August 28, 2020, for a period of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 for an amount not to exceed $862,110. The proposed amended subcontract agreement between ABAG and Contra Costa County will allow the County to continue to implement BayREN subprograms throughout Contra Costa County. The amount specified in the agreement would increase the total contract amount by $284,570 from $862,110 to $1,146,680 and extend the term an additional year for a period of January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2023. These funds are to cover County costs associated with promoting the program for both incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County. Technical services and rebates offered by BayREN for these activities are directly administered by ABAG and are funded separately under the overall BayREN budget approved by the CPUC. Under the subcontract amendment, the County must indemnify the other counties and ABAG for claims alleging intellectual property infringement related to materials the County prepares under the Agreement. The County also must indemnify ABAG, the CPUC, and PG&E from any third-party claims or liabilities that arise from the County's performance of its obligations under the subcontract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would not receive funding for calendar year 2023 to participate in BayREN activities or provide the associated energy efficiency program services to County residents and property owners. The County would also not have funding to support the energy efficiency activities specified in the County’s Climate Action Plan. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept a renewal grant in the amount of $150,000 on behalf of the Contra Costa Alliance to End Abuse (Alliance) from the Blue Shield of California Foundation grant for the “Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence Project” for the period April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an amount not to exceed $150,000 (100% Other: Foundation Grant, No County match required). BACKGROUND: The Alliance to End Abuse has received the “Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence Project,” since 2018. Through this program, the Blue Shield of California Foundation aims to: 1) Better understand how collaboration can more effectively address complex issues like domestic violence; 2) Learn what it takes to convince other sectors to engage around an issue that is still often considered “private” but has a profound impact on multiple parts of a community; and 3) Build an evidence base for collaboration as a promising approach to preventing domestic violence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Employment and Human Services Department Grant Renewal for Blue Shield of California Foundation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Since 2018, the grant supported the publication of the “Call to Action: Preventing Interpersonal Violence,” which serves as a guide to prevent violence in Contra Costa County, in February 2020. It also supported the “Mission Possible” Conference in November 2022, which brought together organizations from Contra Costa County to talk about shared visions, gaps in services, and collaboration efforts. For this next cycle, the Alliance will continue to enhance their multi-sector collaborative to fill critical gaps in domestic violence prevention by engaging new partners and deepening relationships with existing partners in other sectors, and participate in the “Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence Project.” CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, the County would not be able participate in the Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence Project to provide a multifaceted, multi-sectoral, and coordinated approach to domestic violence and abuse. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: By accepting the renewal grant, the work of “Leveraging Collaboration for Domestic Violence,” will meet all five community outcomes for children and families to thrive in Contra Costa County: 1) Children Ready for and succeeding in School; 2) Children and youth healthy and preparing for a productive adulthood; 3) Families that are economically self-sufficient; 4) Families that are safe, stable, and nurturing; 5) Communities that are safe and provide a high qualify of life. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Applied Medical Distribution Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of endomechanical surgical supplies and instruments for the Operating Room at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) for the period from February 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this purchase order will result in expenditures of up to $500,000 over a 26-month period and will be fully funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The CCRMC Operating room has purchased supplies from Applied Medical Distribution Corporation since 2009. Applied Medical Distribution Corporation has been the supplier of endomechanical surgical supplies and instruments for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) since January 2020. Founded in 1987 in Southern California, Applied Medical Distribution Corporation has been developing innovative products to improve patient outcomes and enable the advancement of minimally invasive and general surgeries including the development of new technologies and solutions for bariatric, cardiac, colorectal, gynecologic, obstetric, urologic, and vascular specialties. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gino Rogers, (925) 370-5343 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Applied Medical Distribution Corporation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Applied Medical Distribution Corporation is an awarded supplier on the Vizient Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) contract portfolio for endomechanicals. Additionally, they are a designated supplier on the Vizient Environmentally Preferred Sourcing Program for their trocars and instruments. Applied Medical Distribution Corporation is committed to protecting our environment and the earth’s natural resources. They identify and manage current and future environmental sustainability initiatives by tracking energy usage, water consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation. Through these efforts, they endeavor to reduce our environmental impact consistently and responsibly. Based on Vizient’s 2023 budget impact projections, market prices for medical and surgical supplies are expected to raise by 3.2% to 3.5% due to the persisting challenges facing supply chain. The Consumer price Index-urban is projecting a three-year increase of 14.1%. This is due to the unique market variables created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Volatility in the markets and the large number of unknowns has presented a challenge forecasting economic projections for the healthcare market. To compensate for the market increases the department is recommending an increase of $100,000 over three years to the customary one-year budget request of $199,000. On December 1, 2021 Vizient Supply LLC and Applied Medical Distribution Corporation entered into an amendment to extend the expiration date of the agreement from March 31, 2022 to March 31, 2025. CCRMC is requesting a purchase order through the end of the current Vizient agreement. Approval of this action will allow the vendor to continue providing endomechanical surgical supplies and instruments for the Operating Room at CCRMC. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this purchase order is not approved, patients served by Contra Costa County requiring surgical procedures will be negatively impacted as CCRMC will lack the necessary endomechanical supplies and instruments to perform surgeries. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County, as follows: (1) Cancellation Agreement #26-672-12 with Siri Sunderi Cheng, M.D., an individual, effective at the end of business on February 7, 2023; and (2) Contract #26-672-13 with Siri Sunderi Cheng, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,650,000, to provide otolaryngology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,650,000 over a three-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Health Centers rely on contractors to provide necessary specialty health services to their patients. This contractor has been providing otolaryngology specialty services, including but not limited to: on-call coverage, consultation, training, medical and surgical procedures, and administrative support services since October 2010. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, MD, 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancellation Agreement #26-672-12 and Contract #26-672-13 with Siri Sunderi Cheng, M.D BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On October 4, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-672-11 with Siri Sunderi Cheng, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the provision of otolaryngology services at CCRMC and health centers, for the period October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2025. In consideration of the expected increase of the contractor’s services to be utilized, the recent increase in clinic rates, and a mutual agreement to continue providing such services, the department and the contractor have agreed to (1) a mutual cancellation of the current contract in accordance with the General Conditions Paragraph 5 (Termination), and (2) establish a new contract with the revised terms and conditions for the next three years. Under Contract #26-672-13 this contractor will continue to provide otolaryngology specialty services, including but not limited to, on-call coverage, consultation, training, medical and surgical procedures, and administrative support services with a new contract term of February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the cancellation agreement is not approved, the contractor will not be compensated accurately for the services being provided through the current contract's term ending September 30, 2025. If the new contract is not approved, CCRMC and health centers will not have continued access the specialized otolaryngology services provided to their patients by this established County contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-652-1 with Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC, a limited liability company, effective January 21, 2023, to amend Contract #23-652, to increase the payment limit by $1,197,192, from $878,803, to a new payment limit of $2,075,995, and extend the termination date from January 21, 2023 to January 21, 2026 for additional InterQual software support and services for the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional annual expenditures of up to $1,197,192 and will be funded as budgeted by the department in FY 2022-26, by 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC licenses InterQual software, an evidence-based clinical decision support solution, to help payers, providers, and government agencies make clinically appropriate medical utilization decisions. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) uses the InterQual software and clinical content for performing medical necessity reviews. This software also helps determine appropriateness and level of admission, approximate length of stay, and determination of continued stay. The Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) has used InterQual since (at least) 2020 to ensure the appropriate utilization of resources and for medical necessity criteria. The contractor was awarded a sole-source contract for its solution based on its established communication cadence with Epic, the department's electronic APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rajiv Pramanik MD, 925-765-8689 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: F Carroll, M Wilhelm C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment/Extension #23-652-1 with Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) health records system that helps to ensure best practices when integrating revenue cycle technology. On December 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-652, with Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC, for the provision of software licenses and services regarding its InterQual software, for the period from January 22, 2020, through January 21, 2023. The department requests a retroactive effective date due to a delay in documentation from the contractor. Approval of Contract Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-652-1 will allow the contractor to continue providing software licensing and services through January 21, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County, as follows: (1) Cancellation Agreement #27-319-7 with Diablo Valley Pediatric Medical Group, Inc., a corporation, effective at the end of business on February 28, 2023; and (2) Contract #27-319-8 with DVPediatric Inc. (dba Diablo Valley Pediatrics), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $6,000,000, to provide pediatric primary care services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients, for the period from March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $6,000,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized pediatric primary care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancellation Agreement #27-319-7 with Diablo Valley Pediatric Medical Group, Inc. and Contract #27-319-8 with DVPediatric Inc. (dba Diablo Valley Pedi BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) contracts with the County. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network providing these services since September 2012. On August 9, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-319-6 with Diablo Valley Pediatric Medical Group, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $6,000,000, for the provision of pediatric primary care services for CCHP members and County recipients for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. In consideration of the contractor’s agreement to continue providing services, the department and contractor have agreed to (1) mutual cancellation of the current contract in accordance with General Conditions Paragraph 5 (Termination), Cancellation Agreement #27-319-7 will accomplish this cancellation, and (2) establish a new contract with the correct terms, company name and tax ID number for a three-year period. Under Contract #27-319-8, the contractor will continue to provide pediatric primary care services for CCHP members and County recipients under its new company name and tax ID number, and with a new contract term of March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this cancellation and new contract is not approved certain specialized pediatric primary care services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the county will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Beckman Coulter, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $250,000 for the purchase of reagents and supplies for the Iricell 2000 as needed for the Clinical Laboratory at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), for the period from March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $250,000 for a 29-month period and will be funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The requested reagents and supplies are specifically needed for the use of the Urinalysis Analyzer – Iricell 2000, the device used to perform automatic urine testing in the Clinical Laboratory at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). The department uses Beckman Coulter, Inc., an awarded supplier for urinalysis supplies in the Vizient Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) contract portfolio, as a primary resource for urinalysis testing. On February 3, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.55 to execute a blanket purchase order with Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the amount of $280,000 to purchase reagents and supplies for the Iricell 2000 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sam Ferrell (925), 357-7483 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Beckman Coulter, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2021. On March 11, 2021, the Purchasing Agent execute a blanket purchase order with Beckman Coulter in the amount of $199,000 for the purchase reagents and supplies for the Iricell 2000 for the period from March 1, 2021 through February 28, 2023. Approval of this request will allow the Clinical Laboratory at the CCRMC to continue procuring reagents and supplies for the Iricell 2000 from this vendor through August 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this purchase order is not approved, the CCRMC Clinical Laboratory will not have access to this vendor’s specific patient testing supplies needed to perform urinalysis testing, which may impact patient safety and health. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order with Victory Supply in an amount not to exceed $500,000 to purchase clothing, bedding & linen items as required for inmates for the West County, Martinez and Marsh Creek detention facilities for the period of December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: $500,000. 100% General Fund; Budgeted. BACKGROUND: The Office of the Sheriff is required to provide inmates with bedding, well-fitting clothing and personal hygiene items in accordance with the Title 15 CCR Minimum Standards for Local Detention Facilities. Victory Supply is being used as a secondary vendor for inmate clothing to ensure uninterrupted operation of the Office of the Sheriff facilities. This vendor provides better economical pricing on specific items in comparison to the Sheriff's primary supplier. Their clothing, bedding and linen items do meet the standards and specifications for use in inmate housing facilities. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Sheriff's Office would not be able to purchase required items to operate it's detention facilities at an economical price. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Heike Anderson, (925) 655-0023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order - Victory Supply RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-001-9 with La Clinica De La Raza, Inc. a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $943,285, to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $943,285 and will be funded 100% by Contra Costa Cares Program revenue sources as follows: 50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III and 17% County General Fund. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The goal of the Contra Costa Cares Program is to provide comprehensive primary health care coverage and medical homes to low income, uninsured adults 19 years of age or older residing in Contra Costa County who are ineligible for full-scope Medi-Cal or Covered California APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-001-9 with La Clinica De La Raza, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and whose household gross income does not exceed 138% of the Federal Poverty Level. The program has enrolled over 81,000 individuals. Specialty care, dental, vision, emergency care and hospitalization are not covered benefits of the program. On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-001-7 with La Clinica De La Raza, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $552,412, for the provision of primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On May 10, 2022, the Board of Supervisions approved FY 2022-23 Recommended Budget Actions, discussion item D.3. This allocated an additional $500,000, for Contra Costa Cares Programs to expand outreach and accelerate enrollment. On September 13, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #77-001-8 with La Clinica De La Raza, Inc., effective May 1, 2022, to modify the payment provisions and include integrated behavioral health services to contractor’s obligations, with no change in the original payment limit and with no change in the original term of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #77-001-9 will allow the contractor to continue to provide primary medical care services to the Contra Costa Cares Program, through December 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, low income, uninsured adults would not have access to primary care services in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-002-9 with Lifelong Medical Care, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,403,653, to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $1,403,653 and will be funded 100% by Contra Costa Cares Program revenue sources as follows: 50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III and 17% County General Fund.. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The goal of the Contra Costa Cares Program is to provide comprehensive primary health care coverage and medical homes to low income, uninsured adults 19 years of age or older residing in Contra Costa County who are ineligible for full-scope Medi-cal or Covered California APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-002-9 with Lifelong Medical Care BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and whose household gross income does not exceed 138% of the Federal Poverty Level. The program has enrolled over 81,000 individuals. Specialty care, dental, vision, emergency care and hospitalization are not covered benefits of the program. On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-002-7 with Lifelong Medical Care, in an amount not to exceed $649,656, for the provision of primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On May 10, 2022, the Board of Supervisions approved FY 2022-23 Recommended Budget Actions, discussion item D.3. This allocated an additional $500,000, for Contra Costa Cares Programs to expand outreach and accelerate enrollment. On September 13, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #77-002-8 with Lifelong Medical Care, effective May 1, 2022, to modify the payment provisions and include integrated behavioral health services to the contractor’s obligations, with no change in the original payment limit and with no change in the original term of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #77-001-9 will allow the contractor to continue to provide primary medical care services to the Contra Costa Cares Program, through December 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, low income, uninsured adults would not have access to primary care services in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-003-9 with Brighter Beginnings, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $653,082, to provide primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $653,082 and will be funded 100% by Contra Costa Cares Program revenue sources as follows: 50% Measure X, 33% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund III, and 17% County General Fund. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The goal of the Contra Costa Cares Program is to provide comprehensive primary health care coverage and medical homes to low income, uninsured adults 19 years of age or older residing in Contra Costa County who are ineligible for full-scope Medi-Cal or Covered California and whose household gross income does not exceed 138% of the Federal Poverty Level. The program has enrolled over 81,000 individuals. Specialty care, dental, vision, emergency care and hospitalization are not covered benefits of the program. On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-003-7 with Brighter Beginnings, in an amount not to exceed $297,920, for the provision of primary care medical services for the Contra Costa Cares Program, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On May 10, 2022, the Board of Supervisions approved FY 2022-23 Recommended Budget Actions, discussion item D.3. This allocated an additional $500,000, for Contra Costa Cares Programs to expand outreach and accelerate enrollment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-003-9 with Brighter Beginnings BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On September 13, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #77-003-8 with Brighter Beginnings, effective May 1, 2022, to modify the payment provisions and include integrated behavioral health services to the contractor’s obligations, with no change in the original payment limit and with no change in the original term of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #77-003-9 will allow the contractor to continue to provide primary medical care services to the Contra Costa Cares Program, through December 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, low income, uninsured adults would not have access to primary care services in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-506-15 with Robert Liebig, M.D, an individual, in an amount not to exceed $2,610,000, to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $2,610,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers relies on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Robert Liebig, M.D. for radiology specialty services since April 2003. On November 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-506-12 with Robert Liebig, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,905,000, for the provision of radiology services including, but not limited to: consultation, on-call coverage, and interpretation of computed tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasounds, invasive procedures and plain films at CCRMC for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-506-15 with Robert Liebig, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On December 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-506-13, effective December 1, 2020, to increase the contract payment limit by $135,000, from $1,905,000 to a new payment limit of $2,040,000, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 to provide additional radiology services. On November 29, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-506-14, effective November 1, 2022, to increase the contract payment limit by $50,000, from $2,040,000 to a new payment limit of $2,090,000, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 to provide additional radiology services. The delay of this contract was due to on-going negotiations between contractor and division. Approval of Contract #76-506-15 will allow the contractor to continue to provide radiology services at CCRMC and Health Centers through December 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the necessary specialty radiology services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27-728-9 with Applied Health Corp., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide chiropractic and acupuncture services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $300,000 over a two-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor has been providing chiropractic and acupuncture services to CCHP members as part of the CCHP Provider Network since January 1, 2008. In January 2021, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #27-728-7, with John Erdmann, DC, LAC, in an amount not to exceed APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-728-9 with Applied Health Corp. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) $30,000, for the provision of chiropractic and acupuncture services for CCHP members for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. In January 2023, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Cancellation Contract #27-728-8, effective January 31, 2023 by mutual agreement in order for the contractor formerly known as John Erdmann, DC, LAC, to renew a contract under the new name of Applied Health Corp., for the provision of chiropractic and acupuncture services for CCHP members for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. Approval of Contract #27-728-9 will allow the contractor to continue providing chiropractic and acupuncture services to CCHP members through January 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized chiropractic and acupuncture health care services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided by this contractor and may delay services to CCHP members. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment #77-320-2 with Positive and Vigilant Healthcare, Inc. (dba Alhambra Convalescent Hospital), a corporation, effective February 1, 2023, to amend Contract #77-320 to increase the payment limit by $475,000, from $150,000 to a new payment limit of $625,000 with no change in the term April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $475,000 over a three-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor provides skilled nursing facility (SNF) services for CCHP members. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network for several years, and was formerly under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that has been converted into a County contract since April 1, 2021. In APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 77 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment #77-320-2 with Positive and Vigilant Healthcare, Inc. (dba Alhambra Convalescent Hospital) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) May 2021, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #77-320 with Positive and Vigilant Healthcare, Inc. (dba Alhambra Convalescent Hospital) in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide SNF services to CCHP members for the period April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024. Approval of Contract Amendment #77-320-2 will allow this contractor to provide additional SNF services through March 31, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, skilled nursing facility services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension #77-326-2 with Vale Operating Company, LP (dba Vale Healthcare Center), a limited partnership, to amend Contract #77-326, to extend the termination date from April 30, 2023 to April 30, 2024 with no change in the payment limit of $1,310,000, to provide additional skilled nursing facility (SNF) services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members. FISCAL IMPACT: This extension will not impact the payment limit of $1,310,000 being extended for an additional year, and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network for several years, formerly under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CCHP, and was required to convert to a County contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 78 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension #77-326-2 with Vale Operating Company, LP (dba Vale Healthcare Center) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On April 20, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-326 with Vale Operating Company, LP (dba Vale Healthcare Center) in an amount not to exceed $1,310,000 to provide SNF services for CCHP members for the period period May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2023. Approval of Extension #77-326-2 will allow the contractor to continue to provide skilled nursing facility services through April 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this extension is not approved, skilled nursing facility services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment #77-459-2 with Richmond Post Acute Care, LLC, a limited liability company, effective February 1, 2023, to amend Contract #77-459, to increase the payment limit by $1,200,000, from $400,000 to a new payment limit of $1,600,000 with no change in the term April 1, 2022 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $1,200,000 during the remaining 14 months of the two-year contract and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor provides skilled nursing facility (SNF) services for CCHP members. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network for several years formerly under a memorandum of understanding (MOU), which has been converted to a County contract APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 79 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment #77-459-2 with Richmond Post Acute Care, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) since April 1, 2022. In April 2022, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #77-459 with Richmond Post Acute Care, LLC in an amount not to exceed $400,000 to provide SNF services to CCHP members for the period April 1, 2022 through March 31, 2024. Approval of Contract Amendment #77-459-2 will allow this contractor to provide additional SNF services through March 31, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, skilled nursing facility services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), effective January 1, 2024, to extend the term through July 31, 2024, for on-call roofing and exterior waterproofing services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this action as the amendment is only to extend the term of the contract. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department Facilities Services Division is responsible for roofing repairs, maintenance and exterior waterproofing for all County buildings and facilities. Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), provides all of these services. Facilities receives several emergency requests for roofing services per year especially during the rainy season. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep of County facilities. The contract with Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), is due to expire July 31, 2023. The Public Works Department respectfully requests authorization to extend this contract to July 31, 2024, with no change to the payment limit of $3,000,000 to ensure the County has access to the contractor's services. The contractor is also requesting an increase in contract hourly rates according to the contract provisions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 80 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 1 to the Contract with Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, roofing services with Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), will be discontinued. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Flock Group, Inc., on behalf of the Office of the Sheriff, effective February 7, 2023, through February 6, 2024, in an amount not to exceed $30,000 for the acquisition and installation of automatic license plate reader cameras in Bay Point area and provision of a hosted software system. FISCAL IMPACT: No County Impact; 100% funded by the Keller Canyon Mitigation Grant Fund in the amount of $30,000. BACKGROUND: Flock Group, Inc. provides license plate reading cameras with 24/7 monitoring for homes, businesses, and neighborhoods to protect against illegal dumping, property crime, violent crime, stolen vehicles, and more. In January 2022, members of the Office of the Sheriff responsible for the oversight of law enforcement services in Bay Point began to review options for increased security in their area due APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Abigail Balana, 925-655-0008 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 81 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Flock Group, Inc. for Bay Point BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to an overwhelming increase of illegal dumping in the community. A review of crime statistics in Bay Point shows a significant increase in reported crimes involving quality of life issues, thefts, assaults, and mental health evaluations which directly impact low-income populations and cause a significant increase in cost to taxpayers. It was determined that the low cost of cameras in certain areas of the Bay Point community will aid greatly in the identification of perpetrators for prosecution and prevention of illegal dumping will actually save in the cost of post crime investigations by law enforcement, clean up projects by County Code Enforcement Agents and the environmental impact illegal dumping poses when dangerous materials and chemicals are disposed of in public lands. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras will not be purchased and there will be no additional measures in place to deter and solve crime. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Mark Scott Construction, Inc., to extend the term through August 31, 2024, for on-call maintenance, repair and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this action as the amendment is only to extend the term of the contract. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department Facilities Services Division is responsible for the maintenance and repair of all County buildings and facilities. The County regularly receives requests for services that vary in size, scope and equipment needed to fulfill these requests. Mark Scott Construction, Inc., provides maintenance, repairs and general construction services. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep of County facilities. The contract with Mark Scott Construction, Inc., is due to expire August 31, 2023. The Public Works Department respectfully APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 82 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 1 to the Contract with Mark Scott Construction, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) requests authorization to extend this contract to August 31, 2024, with no change to the payment limit of $5,000,000 to ensure the County has access to the contractor's services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, services with Mark Scott Construction, Inc., will be discontinued and the Public Works Department may have difficulty responding to emergency requests for services. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM for Cleaning Supplies and Equipment, and Custodial Related Products under OMNIA Purchasing Cooperative Program Page 1 of 4 Participating Entity: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Contractor: HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LP This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of February 7, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between Contra Costa County, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”), and HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LP, a Florida limited partnership (which is registered in Florida under the name “HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE, LTD,” and formerly known as The Home Depot PRO) (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”), whose principal place of business is 3400 Cumberland Blvd., Atlanta, GA 30339. The County and Contractor are sometimes referred to herein together as the “Parties,” and each as a “Party.” Whereas, Contractor offers goods and janitorial supplies under that “Cleaning Supplies and Equipment, and Custodial Related Products Services and Solutions Agreement,” dated September 29, 2022, awarded after a competitive process in response to Request for Proposals No. 22-07 by Fresno Unified School District, California (“Master Contract”) and made available to public agencies nationally by OMNIA Public Purchasing Purchasing Alliance (“OMNIA”). Whereas, the County has determined that entering into a participating addendum under the OMNIA program provides a benefit to the County, but that certain terms and conditions of the Master Contract must be modified to meet legal requirements that apply to the County. Whereas, the County is participating in the Master Contract to be able to purchase competitively priced supplies and goods and not to contract for janitorial services. Now therefore, Contractor and the County agree as follows: 1. Term. This Agreement begins on the Effective Date and shall be coterminous with the Master Contract, unless sooner terminated by the Parties. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon ninety (90) calendar days’ prior written notice to the other Party. 2. Payment Limit. The County’s total payments to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed $3,100,000 (“Payment Limit”). Nothing in this Agreement obligates the County to make any purchases, or any particular volume of purchases, under this Agreement. 3. Changes to Master Contract. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms of the Master Contract are incorporated in, and made a part of, this Agreement, except for those terms of the Master Contract that are modified by this Agreement, as follows: a. Parties. Each reference to “Fresno Unified School District,” “Fresno Unified School DISTRICT,” “DISTRICT,” and “District,” is deleted and replaced with “Contra Costa County,” Contra Costa County,” “County,” and “County,” respectively. Each reference to “Contract Administrator” in the Master Contract is hereby deleted and replaced with “Purchasing Agent.” Each reference to “Fresno USD Board” shall be inapplicable for purposes of this Agreement. Each reference to “PROVIDER,” “Supplier,” and “Vendor” in the Master Contract shall mean the Contractor. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM for Cleaning Supplies and Equipment, and Custodial Related Products under OMNIA Purchasing Cooperative Program Page 2 of 4 b. Insurance. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Master Contract, each certificate of insurance that Contractor, or any subcontractor, is required to provide the County under Section 10 of the Master Contract shall include “Contra Costa County, its officers, employees, and representatives” as additional insureds by separate, scheduled or blanket, endorsement. c. Governing Law and Venue. The second sentence of Section 15 (Governing Law and Venue) of the Master Contract is deleted and replaced with the following new second sentence, to read: “Any litigation brought under this Contract shall be filed in a state or federal court in California where venue is proper, and which has jurisdiction over the parties and over the subject matter of the litigation.” d. Purchases and Payments. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Master Contract, all purchases under the Master Contract will be made by the County through purchase orders that incorporate the terms of this Agreement by reference. Terms in the purchase order related to goods ordered, payment terms, and delivery of such goods shall prevail over any conflicting terms of this Agreement and the Master Contract. All other terms of the Master Contract, including but not limited to pricing, insurance, indemnification, warranties, and limitations of warranties, shall prevail over any conflicting terms of the purchase order. 4. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or modified at any time by mutual agreement of the Parties in writing. 5. Performance. Contractor affirms that there are no encumbrances or obstacles, which will prohibit its performance pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Contractor shall be solely responsible for guaranteeing any of its dealers, distributors, or subcontractors perform in accordance with the requirements of the Master Contract. 6. Notices. Notices to the Parties shall be provided to: PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM for Cleaning Supplies and Equipment, and Custodial Related Products under OMNIA Purchasing Cooperative Program Page 3 of 4 Contractor: HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD 3400 Cumberland Blvd, SE Atlanta, GA 30339 Attn: John Pettinelli, Director and Becky Newell, Senior Manager With a copy to: Legal Department County: Contra Costa County, Purchasing Division 40 Muir Road, 2nd floor Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: (925) 957-2495 Attn: Cynthia Shehorn, Procurement Services Manager All notices hereunder shall be in writing and may be sent via personally delivery, overnight carrier with delivery charges for next day delivery prepaid by the sending Party, or sent by First Class, certified mail return receipt required, U.S. Mail, with postage prepared by the sending Party. A courtesy copy of a notice may be given by email, but giving a courtesy copy of a notice by email does not relieve the sending Party of its obligation to give notice to the receiving Party in the manner required by this section. A notice given in accordance with this section shall be effective upon receipt. 7. Successors and Assigns; Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors and assigns. This Agreement may not be assigned by either Party without the express written permission of the other Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM for Cleaning Supplies and Equipment, and Custodial Related Products under OMNIA Purchasing Cooperative Program Page 4 of 4 IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. Participating Entity: Contra Costa County Contractor: HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD, By HD Supply Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, its general partner Signature:Signature: Name: Cynthia Shehorn Name: Title: Procurement Services Manager Title: Approved as to form: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel By: __________________________ Deputy County Counsel Attachment: Master Contract RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, a Participating Addendum and a blanket purchase order with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LP, in an amount not to exceed $3,100,000 for Cleaning Supplies, Equipment, and Custodial Related Services/Solutions for use by all County Departments during the period from February 7, 2023 through October 31, 2025, under the terms of a Master Contract # 22-07 awarded by Fresno Unified School District, CA. FISCAL IMPACT: Product costs paid by County Departments (100% User Departments). BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County's Purchasing Services is requesting approval of a Participating Addendum for Cleaning Supplies, Equipment, and Custodial-Related Services/Solutions, to support the needs of all County Departments. Categories include but are not limited to: chemicals; dilution control chemicals; skin care; industrial paper and dispensers; carpet care; restroom care; APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cindy Shehorn, 925-957-2495 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 83 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a Participating Addendum and Blanket Purchase Order with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LP. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) waste receptacles; trash can liners; machines and parts and accessories; institutional and industrial laundry and kitchen; industrial tools and supplies; cleaning tools; miscellaneous air quality products, green and sustainable items; and all other categories in the Supplier’s full line of products and services. Products are guaranteed through a master contract awarded by Fresno Unified School District, CA, Omnia Partner Purchasing Cooperative Program. Approval of this agreement provides the County with discounted products and no minimum purchase requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval, the County would pay full price on the products they order today, with no purchasing incentives. ATTACHMENTS HD Supply - Cleaning Supplies CC and HD Supply Approved Version _Participating Addendum_122322 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with La Roza Construction, Inc., to extend the term through August 31, 2024, for on-call maintenance, repair and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this action as the amendment is only to extend the term of the contract. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department Facilities Services Division is responsible for the maintenance and repair of all County buildings and facilities. The County regularly receives requests for services that vary in size, scope and equipment needed to fulfill these requests. La Roza Construction, Inc., can provide maintenance, repairs and general construction services. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep of County facilities. The contract with La Roza Construction, Inc., is due to expire August 31, 2023. The Public Works Department respectfully requests APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 84 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 1 to the Contract with La Roza Construction, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) authorization to extend this contract to August 31, 2024, with no change to the payment limit of $2,000,000 to ensure the County has access to the contractor's services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, services with La Roza Construction, Inc., will be discontinued and the Public Works Department may have difficulty responding to emergency requests for services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Aztec Consultants, to extend the term through August 31, 2024, for on-call maintenance, repair and construction services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this action as the amendment is only to extend the term of the contract. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department Facilities Services Division is responsible for the maintenance and repair of all County buildings and facilities. The County regularly receives requests for services that vary in size, scope and equipment needed to fulfill these requests. Aztec Consultants can provide maintenance, repairs and general construction services. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep of County facilities. The contract with Aztec Consultants is due to expire August 31, 2023. The Public Works Department respectfully requests authorization to extend this contract to August 31, 2024, with no change to the payment limit of $6,000,000 to ensure the County has access to the contractor's services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 85 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 2 to the Contract with Aztec Consultants CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, services with Aztec Consultants, will be discontinued and the Public Works Department may have difficulty responding to emergency requests for services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-537 with Center for Applied Behavior Analysis LLC , a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $600,000, to provide Behavioral Health Treatment – Applied Behavioral Analysis (BHT-ABA) services to Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients for the period March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $600,000 over a 2-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized BHT-ABA health care services including, but not limited to; treatment plans to improve the functioning of CCHP members with pervasive developmental disorder or autism under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This new contractor will be part of the CCHP Provider Network providing in-home BHT-ABA services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 86 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-537 with Center for Applied Behavior Analysis LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Under new Contract #77-537, the contractor will provide BHT - ABA services for CCHP members and County recipients through February 28, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized behavioral health treatment-applied behavioral analysis services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County as follows: (1) Cancellation Agreement #26-515-20 with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of California, P.A., a corporation, effective at the close of business on February 7, 2023; and (2) Contract #26-515-21 with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of California, P.A., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000, to provide teleradiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,200,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to their patients. CCRMC has been contracting with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 87 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancellation Agreement #26-515-20 and Contract #26-515-21 with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of California, P.A. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) California, P.A. since March 2005. On October 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-515-19 with Virtual Radiologic Professionals of California, P.A., in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for the provision of teleradiology services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. In consideration of the County’s difficulty retaining qualified diagnostics radiologists for teleradiology services and recent negotiations with the contractor, the department and contractor have agreed to (1) mutual cancellation of the current contract in accordance with General Conditions Paragraph 5 (Termination), of the contract (Cancellation Agreement #26-515-20) will accomplish this cancellation, and (2) establish a new contract with increased rates for the next three years. Approval of Contract #26-515-21 will allow the contractor to continue providing teleradiology services through January 31, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, this contractor will not continue to provide teleradiology services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers which may lead to longer wait times for patients. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-400-16 with Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $190,000, to provide professional consultation services to the Health Services Director with regard to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted annual expenditures of up to $190,000 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The County has been contracting with Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation, since April 2007 to provide professional consultation services to the Health Services Director with regard to CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers including, increasing community awareness of services provided; developing fundraising goals, policies, and procedures and by-laws; and working closely with CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Center’s administrative and medical staff to develop "Application Guidelines" for requesting funding. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 88 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-400-16 with Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On January 2022, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed #23-400-15 with Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation, in an amount not to exceed $190,000, to provide professional consultation services to the Health Services Director with regard to CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. The delay of this contract was due to negotiations between the County and the contractor with regard to the scope of work. Approval of Contract #23-400-16 will allow the contractor to continue to provide consultation services through September 30, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not continue to receive continuous community support and fundraising activities for CCRMC and Health Centers. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #26-792-8 with Edward Y. Tang, M.D., Inc., a corporation, effective February 15, 2023, to extend the termination date from February 28, 2023 to May 31, 2023 with no change in the original payment limit of $1,230,000, for orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers. FISCAL IMPACT: None, there is no change in the original payment limit of $1,230,00 which is funded by 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers relies on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Edward Y. Tang, M.D., Inc., for orthopedic specialty services since March 2015. On February 4, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-792-7, with Edward Y. Tang, M.D., Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,230,000, for the provision of orthopedic services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period March 1, 2020 through February 28, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5475 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 89 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension #26-792-8 with Edward Y. Tang, M.D., Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #26-792-8 will allow the contractor to continue providing orthopedic services through May 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the necessary specialty orthopedic services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Department, a purchase order with Trace3, LLC in an amount not to exceed $65,324 for the purchase of PagerDuty, Inc. software licenses and support for the period from August 29, 2020 through August 30, 2023. The services being purchased from PagerDuty, Inc. will be governed by the Terms of Use approved by the board on July 28, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this purchase order will result in expenditures of up to $65,324 and will be entirely funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department Information Technology unit utilizes PagerDuty, Inc. on-call management software across its enterprise-wide service desk, for all internal alert services, including on-call system rotation, incident response, and triage alerts. PagerDuty, Inc. automates and streamlines downtime alert notices to minimize the necessity of an after-hours response and allows for alert management on a single platform. On July 28, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.60 to execute (1) Purchase Order #20050 with Groupware Technology in an amount not to exceed $56,376 for the purchase of PagerDuty, Inc. software licenses and support for the period from August 29, 2020 to August 30, 2023 and (2) a Service Terms of Use agreement with PagerDuty, Inc. On April 1, 2021 Groupware Technology merged with Trace3, LLC and a new purchase order is needed to pay Trace3, LLC. The services being purchased from PagerDuty, Inc. will be governed by the Terms of Use approved by the board on July 28, 2020, which includes indemnifying the contractor for failure by County to comply with provisions of the agreement. Approval of the requested purchase order will allow this vendor to continue providing PagerDuty, Inc. software licenses and support for Health Services IT through August 30, 2023. This request is retroactive APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Neil Olsen, (925) 374-2440 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 90 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Trace3, LLC for Pager Duty Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) due to an administrative oversight, and is tied to the original purchase order with the efffective date of August 29, 2020. This approval also allows for additional licenses to be purchased with the purchase order under the correct vendor name. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, alerts may be inconsistently received and may end up going to the incorrect individuals, resulting in extended downtimes and outages, and reducing the ability for CCHS to provide services to both internal and external users. Without PagerDuty, alerts are not managed through a central system, and it is a confusing and lengthy process to add and remove users from shifts. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County as follows: (1) Cancellation Agreement #76-620-3 with Christian Eisert, M.D., an individual, effective at the end of business on February 7, 2023; and (2) Contract #76-620-4 with Christian Eisert, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,320,000, to provide otolaryngology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,320,000 over a three-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to their patients. This contractor has been providing otolaryngology specialty services, including but not limited to: on-call coverage, consultation, training, medical and surgical procedures, and administrative support services since October 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D. (925)370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 91 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancellation Agreement #76-620-3 and Contract #76-620-4 with Christian Eisert, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On October 4, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-620-2 with Christian Eisert, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for the provision of otolaryngology services at CCRMC and health centers, for the period October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2025. In consideration of the contractor’s services expected to be utilized, the recent increase in clinic rates and the agreement to continue providing such services, the department and contractor have agreed to (1) mutual cancellation of the current contract in accordance with the General Conditions Paragraph 5 (Termination), of the contract (Cancellation Agreement #76-620-3), and (2) establish a new contract with the correct terms and conditions for the next three years. Under Contract #76-620-4, the contractor will continue to provide otolaryngology services with a new contract term of February 8, 2023 through January 31, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the cancellation is not approved, the contractor will not be compensated accurately for the services being provided. If the new contract is not approved, certain specialized otolaryngology services for CCRMC patients will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-700-16 with Jaison James, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000, to provide orthopedic services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Center patients, for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,200,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers relies on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Dr. James for orthopedic specialty services since August 2011. On February 22, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-700-15 with Jaison James, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $400,000, to provide orthopedic services, including consultation, training, medical and surgical procedures for CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers patients for the period from February 1, 2022 through January 31, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 92 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-700-16 with Jaison James, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #26-700-16 will allow the contractor to continue to provide orthopedic services through January 31, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the necessary specialty orthopedic services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-507-19 with Lee A. Shratter, M.D, an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,860,000, to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,860,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers relies on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Lee A. Shratter, M.D. for radiology specialty services since 2003. On November 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-507-17 with Lee A. Shratter, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,230,000, for the provision of radiology services including, but not limited to: consultation, on-call coverage, and interpretation of computed tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasounds, invasive procedures and plain films at CCRMC for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. On October 20, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-507-18, effective October 1, 2020, to increase the contract payment limit by $90,000, from $1,230,000 to a new payment limit of $1,320,000, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 to provide additional radiology services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 93 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-507-19 with Lee A. Shratter, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The delay of this contract was due to on-gong negotiations between the contractor and the division. Approval of Contract #76-507-19 will allow this contractor to continue to provide radiology services at CCRMC through December 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the necessary specialty radiology services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to pay $82,967 to US Foods, Inc. for the purchase of various food categories, chemicals, paper products, kitchen supplies and equipment for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) during the period of July 12, 2022, through December 29, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in expenditures of up to $82,967 and is entirely funded through the Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: US Foods, Inc. (dba US Foodservice, Inc.) has been CCRMC’s primary food and nutrition distributor for the past year and has done an excellent job in offering a variety of food options at a lower price than our previous vendor, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. The Nutrition Department recently transitioned from utilizing Food Service Partners to preparing food in house. Making this transition was imperative for improving patient food quality and standards, which has also increased our need to rely on US Foods, Inc. for most of our product needs. On January 11, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved item C.78 to execute a purchase order (#24200) with US Foods, Inc. in the amount of $1,000,000 for the purchase of all food categories, chemicals, paper products, kitchen supplies and equipment for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), for the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. US Foods, Inc. is an awarded supplier for Food and Nutrition Distribution on the Vizient Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) contract portfolio. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Stephanie N. Dockham, (925) 370-5381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 94 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Products and Supplies Provided by US Foods, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) During the past year, food inflation has risen by approximately 7.5% - 8.5% due to key factors such as increased freight charges and delays, elevated labor wages and labor shortages, grain and poultry shortages and drought conditions. Due to administrative oversight, the department did not become aware of the shortfall in available funds under the current purchase order with US Foods, Inc. until November of 2022. As such, the Department recommends that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment to US Foods, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $82,967. Nutrition services will continue to collaborate with Materials Management to track and monitor their monthly expenses going forward. The vendor is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of the products and supplies under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. The theory provides that where a vendor has been asked to provide products and supplies without a valid payment instrument, and the vendor does so to the benefit of the County, the vendor is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those items. The vendor has provided services at the request of the CCRMC staff. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Title 22 requires the provision of food of the quality and quantity to meet the patient's needs in accordance with physicians' orders and, to the extent medically possible, to meet the Recommended Daily Dietary Allowances, adopted by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. If this action is not approved, the CCRMC account will be placed on hold and Nutrition Services would not be able to prepare meals for patients and/or the hospital staff, and be in violation of Title 22, CMS, and other regulatory agencies. ATTACHMENTS CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Cooling Towers BLOW UP OF COOLONG TOWER AREA EXISTING ROOFTOP COOLING TOWERS PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW GROUND BASED COOLING TOWERS RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. APPROVE the design and bid documents, including the plans and specifications, for the Cooling Towers Replacement Project at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). 2. AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to solicit bids to be received on or about March 16, 2023, and issue bid addenda, as needed, for clarification of the bid documents, provided the changes do not significantly increase the construction cost estimate. 3. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish, at least 14 calendar days before the bid opening date, the Notice to Contractors in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22037, inviting bids for this Project. 4. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to send notices by email or fax and by U.S. Mail to the construction trade journals specified in Public Contract Code Section 22036 at least 15 calendar days before the bid opening. 5. DETERMINE the Project is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 2 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15302 (c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to the Department of Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Enterprise I Funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Acuff, 925-957-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 95 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Advertisement and CEQA actions for the Cooling Towers Replacement Project at CCRMC (WH536B) BACKGROUND: The Cooling Towers Replacement Project is located at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center in Martinez, California. The cooling towers serve the heating, cooling and ventilation system for the main hospital. They provide space cooling to the interior spaces in the hospital. The three existing cooling towers are over 25 years old and have exceeded their expected useful life. Maintenance costs to keep the existing towers functional have increased over the last few years. Contra Costa County Public Works Department is engaged in a project to replace the existing rooftop cooling towers with new, at-grade cooling towers. A new exterior support structure for the new cooling towers will be constructed at grade on the northeast side of the hospital near a service loading dock. The replacement cooling towers will be installed there. Taking advantage of the existing turn-around space adjacent to the service loading dock, very little new hardscape will be required. New overhead utility service lines will be installed connecting the new cooling towers to the existing hospital mechanical plant and power plant. The new towers will be tied in to the hospital’s HVAC system before the existing rooftop towers are decommissioned and demolished. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the advertisement is not approved, the Project will not be constructed, subjecting the hospital to increasing maintenance effort and expense to keep the existing equipment operational and leaving the hospital increasingly vulnerable to a catastrophic system failure that would leave the hospital without space cooling, potentially forcing the closure of the hospital. Alternately, the County might pursue the replacement of the towers in-place, on the roof of the hospital. However, this approach would be more costly, would take longer to execute, would result in a temporary (days to weeks) shutdown of the hospital cooling system, and would miss an opportunity to make the system easier to maintain. ATTACHMENTS CEQA - NOE WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGT-1SHEET INDEXVICINITY MAPDIRECTIONSSITE INFORMATIONPROJECT DIRECTORY11"x17" PLOT WILL BE HALF SCALE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDGENERAL NOTESSITE PHOTOWIRELESS®SITE ADDRESS:S. EAGLE CREST DRIVEDANVILLE, CA 95606DISH WIRELESS SITE ID:SFSFO00884ASCOPE OF WORKCODE COMPLIANCEUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTUTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA(800) 422-4133WWW.CALIFORNIA811.ORG··············PG&E SITE ID: PITTSBURG-SANRAMON - 230 KV_016/064SBA SITE ID: CA27919-U·················DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 REVISIONS: PROJECT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: SFSFO00884A S. EAGLE CREST DR. DANVILLE, CA. 95606 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SITE SURVEY LS-1 15604 Magnolia Rd.Grass Valley, CA. 95949Ph. 530.830.0038 Surveying, Inc.Eaton Land 5701 SOUTH SANTA FE DRIVE LITTLETON, CO 80120 REVISIONS: PROJECT INFORMATION: SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: SFSFO00884A S. EAGLE CREST DR. DANVILLE, CA. 95606 SANTA CLARA COUNTY NOTES LS-2 15604 Magnolia Rd.Grass Valley, CA. 95949Ph. 530.830.0038 Surveying, Inc.Eaton Land 5701 SOUTH SANTA FE DRIVE LITTLETON, CO 80120 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-11DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-11DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-21DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-3213DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 CAUTION !On this t o we r : Radio freq u e nc y ( RF ) f i e ld s n ea r s om e antennas may excee d the FCC Occupatio n a l E x p o su r e L im i t s . Personne l c l i mb i n g t h i s to w e r s h o u ld b e trained fo r w o rk i n g in R F e n v i ro n m en t s a nd use a pers o n a l R F m o n i t or i f wo r k i ng n e a r active ant e n n as Caution Sign #C A - 1 B P - AL - 1 2 8 This is AT&T site___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-421DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 CAUTION!On this tower:Radio frequency (RF) fields near someantennas may exceed the FCCOccupational Exposure Limits.Personnel climbing this tower should betrained for working in RF environments anduse a personal RF monitor if working nearactive antennasCaution Sign #CA-1BP-AL-128This is AT&T site________________WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGA-521DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGD-1147258369DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGD-2725869LT-PM63915xN42. PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONThe CUBE is a single equipment compartment with 39RU of 23” horizontal rack mount spacing with a 600A 48VDC rack mounted ABBpower system. The PM639155N4 has a 6000W heat exchanger, and the PM63915IN4 has a 6000BTU HVAC system.Figure 2 shows the CUBE dimensions. Figures 3 and 4 show the main components of each CUBE.Figure 2 CUBE Dimensions (in inches)All dimensions are common to both models except for depth of thermal unit.DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGD-34213DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGD-4147258369DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGE-1321LOAD SERVEDVOLT AMPS(WATTS)TRIPCKT#PHASECKT#TRIPVOLT AMPS(WATTS)LOAD SERVEDL1L2L1L2DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGE-24728315DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGG-112”“”12DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGG-2147258369DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGRF-1DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGGN-1DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGGN-2DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGGN-3·······DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 WIRELESS®1511 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE., SUITE DFULLERTON, CA 92831America TelecomLLCCDGGN-4DATE STAMPED: 07/22/2022 CDLP22-02008 Legend 1:564 Notes0.00.01 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.0 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Aerial Photo City Limits Streets Building Outlines Assessment Parcels World Imagery Low Resolution 15m Imagery High Resolution 60cm Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Citations CDLP22-02008 Legend 1:4,514 Notes0.10.07 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. General Plan: Parks and Recreation (PR) City Limits General Plan SV (Single Family Residential - Very Low) SL (Single Family Residential - Low) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) SH (Single Family Residential - High) ML (Multiple Family Residential - Low) MM (Multiple Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) MV (Multiple Family Residential - Very High) MS (Multiple Family Residential - Very High Special) CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) MO (Mobile Home) M-1 (Parker Avenue Mixed Use) M-2 (Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use) M-3 (Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use) M-4 (Willow Pass Road Mixed Use) M-5 (Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use) M-6 (Bay Point Residential Mixed Use) M-7 (Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Mixed Use) M-8 (Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed Use) M-9 (Montalvin Manor Mixed Use) M-10 (Willow Pass Business Park Mixed Use) M-11 (Appian Way Mixed Use) M-12 (Triangle Area Mixed Use) M-13 (San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use) M-14 (Heritage Mixed Use) CO (Commercial) OF (Office) BP (Business Park) LI (Light Industry) HI (Heavy Industry) AL, OIBA (Agricultural Lands & Off Island Bonus Area) CR (Commercial Recreation) ACO (Airport Commercial) LF (Landfill) PS (Public/Semi-Public) PR (Parks and Recreation) OS (Open Space) AL (Agricultural Lands) AC (Agricultural Core) DR (Delta Recreation) WA (Water) WS (Watershed) Streets LP22-2008 WM18-0037 LP08-2065 DP05-3059 DP05-3022 CV12-0082 AT&T Metro PCS CDLP22-02008 Legend 1:4,514 Notes0.10.07 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Zoning: Planned Unit District (P-1) City Limits Zoning R-6 (Single Family Residential) R-6, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-6 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) R-6 -TOV -K (Tree Obstruction and Kensington) R-6, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-6 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-7 (Single Family Residential) R-7 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-10 (Single Family Residential) R-10, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) R-20 (Single Family Residential) R-20, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-40 (Single Family Residential) R-40, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-40, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-65 (Single Family Residential) R-100 (Single Family Residential) D-1 (Two Family Residential) D-1 -T (Transitional Combining District) D-1, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) M-12 (Multiple Family Residential) M-12 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) M-17 (Multiple Family Residential) M-29 (Multiple Family Residential) F-R (Forestry Recreational) F-R -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) F-1 (Water Recreational) F-1 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2 (General Agriculture) A-2, -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-2, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) A-2, -SG (Solar Energy Generation Combining District) A-2 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) A-3 (Heavy Agriculture) A-3 -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-3, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-3 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-3, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) r lat4,. •`'"'.`J ' 1.'i'°M v. 4'. t•tiw••)r(^.y'.j r'J;'r '^4.'y' i . w• ..f. • • •• i'w JUN 3 - Iseb 85 70476 ucoAotDATAAoucsr FOUNDS TTTUE COMPANY RECOUND AT THE IWODUT Opi AT O,CLOCK-f .µZGSTACOWAA COWRY 11COADS k, aB lDZCORDSD RBTIIIIl1 TOs Fbi i r.A. OLSSON r+CouNrrlucoltoa vAa vooaaxa ` SUM(' Post Office Box V Walnut Creek, California 94596-1270 IX, e $:%r-,'I- 029 ccqq PtuJ203-oA0,LUl03-031v903-731-008 cif 203- 731-ot9,203- 40-003 220 11D-033, 210- u0-034 i 22o-120-001 GIRgy.D ror valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, 3LACX U t* CORPORATION, a Dsiafrare Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Grantor'), hereby grants to the f C= TY Or CONTRA COSTA, a Political subdivision of the state of California ( hereinafter referred to as "County") and its governmental successors, the future "Development xigbts," as hereinafter defined in those certain paroels of real pro - party situate in the County of Contra Costa, state of California, Nora partienlari<y described as followss , i Parcels D, 31 P and C as shown upon the gap of subdivision 6432 recorded in the office of the + Knoorder of Contra Coats County on Ucembtr 19 , 1 198/1 in Book = of Maps at Pages L"pet. seq," Development lights" are defined as the right to approve or disapprove any proposed construction, development or 120rovaaent which would substantially and materially change the nature of the •current proposed use' of said real pro- perty. the " current proposed use" of said real property and 733-8/ 10 -l. j 3'7e'!i+T f ri Sr. ' ;. l'. S1y Y t • .j. . I.'R•4.—•3t 1}Ys. j•p .. •.y'a.'. _ • r +j' y, • / t lands adjacent thereto, is shown, in part, on said maps and is described, in part, in' the final Development elan in County Application 3055-79 approved by the san Ramon Valley yt Area planning Ccmisaion of the County of Contra Costa on December 21, 1079, and includes the following' as trails, walkways and•paths and associated improvementsf b. private roads and drivewayst o. landscaped areas including irrigation facilitiest d. entrance gate and gatehouses e. fencing and walls; f. street lightsi g. utilities and utility facilities and installations including, but not limited to, sanitary several natural gas mains, laterals and servieest water sains, laterals and serviosst, water tanks, pumps, and associated equipment, facilities and Improvements; and telephone and cable television facilities ho storm drains culverts pipess drainage facilitiest systems and patternas and retention panda for the collection, control, discharge or storage of storm and surface waterat I. all reasonable and necessary incidents to any of the foregoing including improvements neoessary to provide access thereto, 733-8410 -2- s'o:.%'.5+'3.`.rijz ,;``'",M'r.,rraY.. /..v.•+n-Sl S+Xt'df • •, .yli.,..7,• • ,,. "•:'*!'!. j• golf courses, including, but not limited to, greens, fairways, rough, ponds, and associated landscaping, and clubhouses, including, but not limited to, restaurants, bars, pro shops and parkingl k, such other facilities as may be'deemed desirable by the owner of said real property, from time to tine, exclusively for the maiateaance and preservation of said real property and/or the recreational and leisure activities of the owners, awtmbers, reai- dsnts and users of the real property shown on said maps and owned by 8lackhawk Corporation and any and all planning, design and landscaping incident thereto. If any lands subject to this Grant of Development Rights shall be subject to a lot line adjustment, new tentative MP, final map, parcel map or certificate of compliance in lieu of any such map all as provided under the fubdivimion Map Act (Government Code sections 66110 at. seq.) and, as a result of:suoh adjustment or resubdivision a portion of such lands are added to any privately owned parcel or site or become a privately owned parcel or site, the rights and easements granted hereby shall be extinguished with respect to such portion and the permitted uses thereof shall be Private Area or private'Rocreational Area as defined in and 733-1410 -3- it . • .Vr' 3.' ijg 1. .., 1G+W,.v Yayi;ry •`. t•:rv'L •., •'.+,.. :' .. .~", + permitted by that certain Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions executed by Grantor on g t October 5, 1979, and recorded In the official Records, Office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on octaber 10, 1979, in gook 9570 of Contra Costa County Records at pages 472 at seq., as amended by documents p recorded on October 23, 1970, ;Mcember 21, 1979, December 9, 1911, and July 20, 1984, in gook 9580 at Pages 445 at seq., in Book 96C9 at Pages 450 at sea., as Series 81-159572 and Series 84-100893, respectively, of said Records. The `Development Rights" are, and shall be a form of negstivi easement in gross (but not a reciprocal negative easement) over all Of the real property particularly described above, which aha11 burden such particularly described real property and shall bind the current owner and any future owner or owners of all or any portion of the real property particularly described above. in the event of County,s (or its successor's) disapproval of proposed construction covered by the conveyance of •Development Rights* herein, said proposed Construction shall not be par - formed. County, or its suCaessor, mpJ condition its appro- val of any • proposed construction upon the prior or subsequent performance of much conditions as County, or its suoceasor, may does appropriate. MY cwaer or owners of ail or any portion of the real property particularly described above desiring to develop 733-e4iO -4- i t d r,:t "7R' ..yvttij; w' sY t' y4: w w ,•... y h , r• .rrA' r. h any improvement requiring the approval of County, or its successor, shall submit to the County Board of Supervisors, or the governing body of its, suocessor; a written proposal describing the nature, extent and location of such iaprove- sent. County, or its successor, shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of such proposal in which to approve or disapprove the proposal. failure by County, or its suo•- oessor, to approve or disapprove within said tins sball be conclusively deemed to be approval of.such proposal. Dated this lath day of DeLem6er BLACItUWX CORPOPATION, a Delaware corporation enAQtAmrorey s8DZSEM/6Arl 733-6410 _S RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Minor Utility Extensions – Class 3(d). 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE, under the terms of the attached grant deed of development rights held by the County, Dish Wireless to collocate a wireless telecommunication facility on a PG&E transmission tower located on Assessor’s Parcel No. 203-760-036, near the Eagle Nest Lane/Eagle Nest Place intersection, in the Danville/Blackhawk area, in accordance with County land use permit LP22-02008. 3. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development – Community Development Division to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. The applicant has paid the necessary application deposit and is obligated to pay supplemental fees to recover any and all additional costs associated with the application process. BACKGROUND: The proposed Dish Network wireless telecommunication facility will be located on an existing PG&E transmission tower located on an open space parcel in Blackhawk west of the intersection of Eagle Nest Place and Eagle Nest Road. Per the conditions of approval (COA) of Subdivision 6432, the development rights for the open space parcel have been dedicated to Contra Costa County necessitating the Board to authorize installation of the facility on the existing tower. The PG&E transmission tower currently includes T-Mobile and AT&T wireless telecommunications facilities. The PG&E transmission tower also includes a Metro PCS facility not currently in operation. The T-Mobile and Metro PCS facilities were approved by the Zoning Administrator on February 27, 2006, and by the Board of Supervisors on March 13, 2007. The existing AT&T facility was approved to be collocated on the tower by the Zoning Administrator on July 6, 2009, and then by the Board of Supervisors on October 6, 2009. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Everett Louie 925-655-2873 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 96 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Authorization for the Installation of a Telecommunications Facility within the Blackhawk Development (Dish Wireless - Applicant) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On April 15, 2022, Dish Wireless submitted an application to amend the Blackhawk Final Development Plan (County File #CDDP84-03003) to allow the colocation of a Dish wireless telecommunication equipment on the existing Pacific Gas & Electric tower. The proposed facility will consist of the following tower equipment: three (3) panel antennas, six (6) remote radio units (two per sector), one surge suppression device, one hybrid cable, twenty-four (24) jumpers, three (3) remote electrical tilt cables. Ground based equipment will be placed within a 116-square-foot lease that includes: one cable tray / ice bridge, one utility H-frame, one baseband unit in cabinet, one equipment cabinet, one power conduit, one TELCO conduit, one NEMA 3 TELCO-fiber box, one global positioning system (GPS) antenna and a Camlock GEN LUG Intersect. The antennas will be located at the top of the existing Pacific Gas & Electric transmission tower, and the ground-based equipment will be located under the tower behind a 6 foot eight-inch-tall enclosure. On November 21, 2022, the Zoning Administrator conducted a noticed public hearing on the application. No public testimony was received, and the application was approved subject to conditions. As such, the proposed project is deemed consistent with the existing uses on-site, which was approved by the Zoning Administrator. Therefore, staff recommends the Board of Supervisors authorize the collocation of the Dish wireless telecommunication facility on the property where the development rights have been granted to the County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County File #CDLP22-02008 will be denied, and the applicant will not have the right to construct a new Dish Wireless Telecommunications facility. ATTACHMENTS Approved Permit CDLP22-02008 Grant Deed of Development Rights Maps Project Plans Advisory Body Name: Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location: Chair (during the reporting period): Staff Person (during the reporting period): Reporting Period: I. Activities (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the activities for the past year including areas of study, work, special events, collaborations, etc. ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT II. Accomplishments (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the accomplishments for the past year, particularly in reference to your work plan and objectives. III.Attendance/Representation (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe your membership in terms of seat vacancies, diversity, level of participation, and frequency of achieving a quorum at meetings. Describe the advisory body's workplan, including specific objectives to be achieved in the upcoming year. V. Proposed Work Plan/Objectives for Next Year IV. Training/Certification (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe any training that was provided or conducted, and any certifications received, either as a requirement or done on an elective basis by members. NOTE: Please forward copies of any training certifications to the Clerk of the Board. (estimated response length: 1/2 page) RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Annual Report on Council on Homelessness Advisory Board itemizing the advisory body’s activities and accomplishments for 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1, which requires that each advisory board, commission, or committee (body) to report annually to the Board on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. The attached report was reviewed and approved by the Council on Homelessness Advisory Board on January 19, 2022 and fulfills this requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this report is not received, the Council on Homelessness will not meet its annual reporting requirement to the Board of Supervisors. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, (925) 608-6700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 97 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Council on Homelessness Advisory Body 2022 Annual Report ATTACHMENTS Council on Homelessness 2022 Annual Report Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 1 of 24 RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Accept this report on needle exchange as part of the comprehensive prevention program to reduce transmission of HIV in Contra Costa County. 2) Direct the Health Services Department to continue supporting and monitoring sterile needle exchange services utilizing a modified “needs-based” distribution exchange model with built-in incentives to return used needles. GLOSSARY Terms currently used to discuss needle exchange services include: ◻ Sterile needle/syringe instead of clean needle/syringe. ◻ Used needle/syringe instead of dirty needle/syringe. ◻ People who inject drugs (PWID) instead of Injection Drug Users (IDUs). ◻ One-for-one exchange model involves exchanging one sterile needle/syringe for a used one; the individual cannot get any additional needles/syringes. ◻ Needs-based exchange model is less restrictive and allows individuals to receive as many needles/syringes as they self-report using in each day, without regard to the number of needles and syringes returned. This model increases opportunity for PWID to always have a sterile needle on hand. SUMMARY In 2006, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors: • Terminated the local State of Emergency first declared on December 14, 1999. • Authorized the Health Services Department to administer a clean needle and syringe exchange project pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 121349 et seq; and • Directed the Health Services Director to annually report to the Board on the status of the clean needle and syringe exchange project. This report satisfies State regulatory requirements to maintain needle exchange services in Contra Costa and covers the period of January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. As of June 2022, 2,869 individuals are living wit h HIV or AIDS in Contra Costa. Between 2020 and 2022, the percentage of people living with HIV and identifying injection drug use (IDU) as the mode of transmission has dropped from 6.7% of all those living with HIV to 6.4%. In addition, the percentage of those newly infected with HIV in 2021/2022 identifying IDU as the mode of transmission was 1.3%, a decrease from 2018 (2.7%) and 2019 (2.1%). This speaks in large part to the importance of the County’s accessible, weekly needle exchange services. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 2 of 24 In Contra Costa County, needle exchange services are provided through a contract with the HIV Education and Prevention Project of Alameda County (HEPPAC). The Health Department provides an annual amount of $97,000 from County General Funds to support the weekly operation of needle exchange services in West and East County. In addition, harm red uction services including needle exchange are offered in Martinez at Waterfront Park by the Martinez Harm Reduction Collective (MHRC), a volunteer group that acts as a secondary exchanger with HEPPAC. Please note, the funds from Contra Costa’s contract with HEPPAC do not support MHRC; HEPPAC utilizes funds from other sources to provide them with technical assistance and harm reduction supplies. The availability of needle exchange as part of a comprehensive continuum of services for PWID continues to be a necessary public health measure to reduce transmission of blood borne diseases in Contra Costa. BACKGROUND ON ACCESS TO STERILE NEEDLES TO REDUCE TRANSMISSION The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) reports that of the 139,703 people who were living with HIV/AIDS in California in 2020, 5.5% identified their risk for HIV as solely as IDU.1 Further, the CDPH Office of Viral Hepatitis reports that transmission of hepatitis C is primarily through sharing needles, syringes, or other drug inject ion equipment. Lack of access to new, sterile injection equipment is one of the primary risk factors that may lead to sharing hypodermic needles and syringes, which puts PWID at elevated risk for HIV, HCV, and Hepatitis B infections.2 Needle exchange has been an essential component of Contra Costa’s strategy to reduce the transmission of HIV attributed to IDU since 1999, when the program operated under the Board’s declaration of a State of Emergency to authorize needle exchange services. Health and Safety Code Section 121349.3 removed the requirement for a Declaration of Emergency and current regulations now require only that needle exchange information be provided at an open meeting of the authorizing body every two years. From 2005-2010, Contra Costa participated in a statewide Disease Prevention Demonstration Project (DPDP) to assess the potential to reduce transmission of HIV by increasing access to sterile needles and syringes. The project evaluation showed lower injection -related risks among people who inject drugs in counties with syringe exchange programs. Additionally, evaluators of the pilot project found lower levels of unsafe discard of used syringes, no increase in the rate of accidental needle-stick injuries to law enforcement, and no increase in rates of drug use or drug- related crime.3 1 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/ https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DOA/CDPH%20Document%20Library/California_HIV_Surveillance_Report2020_ADA.pdf 2 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/2018-Chronic-HCV-Surveillance-Report-Exec- Summary.pdf 3 The full report of the evaluation can be accessed on the California Department of Public Health, Office of AIDS website http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/Documents/SB1159StateReportFinal.pdf - Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 3 of 24 As a result of the success of the DPDP, 2011 legislation expanded syringe access through pharmacies throughout the state. Assembly Bill (AB) 1743 (Ting, Chapter 331, Statutes of 2014) further expanded access in January 2015 by allowing customers to purchase and possess an unlimited number of syringes. Participating pharmacies must provide counseling and offer information on safe disposal. REDUCING TRANSMISSION OF DISEASE As of June 30, 2022, there were 2,869 individuals reported living with HIV (PLHIV) in Contra Costa. Roughly 33.7% reside in Central County, 33.5% in West County, and 32.8% in East County.4 Of all PLHIV in Contra Costa, 323 individuals (11.3%) identify injection drug use or injection drug use among men who have sex with other men as their mode of HIV transmission.5 Among new HIV infections in Contra Costa County, most new cases are still attributed to male-to- male sexual contact (MMSC). Of the total newly diagnosed HIV cases (153) between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 94 (61.4%) were attributed to MMSC. Since 2018 the total number of new diagnoses attributable to injection drug alone use has decreased from 2.7% to 1.3%. Chart 1: Distribution of all PLWH by Region in Contra Costa as of 6/30/2022 West, 33.5% East, 32.8% Central, 33.7% MATERNAL TRANSMISSION It often takes two or three months for an accurate diagnosis of HIV or AIDS in a newborn since a positive test at birth may reflect maternal antibodies and not HIV infection. Children with HIV have usual childhood infections more often and more severely than uninfected children and can also be susceptible to the same opportunistic infections as adults with HIV. Of the 2,869 individuals living with HIV or AIDS in Contra Costa County in 2022, 26 are pediatric cases: the majority are now adults and 3 are children 12 years of age or younger. Identification and treatment of HIV-positive women in prenatal care is nearly universal, but we continue to encounter women who do not seek prenatal care prior to delivery. As an example, in February 2022, Contra Costa had one new case of 4 Data Use Agreement (DUA) Q2 2022 5 Data from 2022 Data Use Agreement (DUA) Data, Q2 2022. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 4 of 24 Chart 2: Reported (Non Medical) Needle Stick Exposures to First Responders Over Time 30 20 10 0 19/20 20/21 21/22 Needlestick All Exposures maternally transmitted HIV. A comprehensive case review completed by our HIV Surveillance Coordinator and the Outbreak and Investigation Unit of the Office of AIDS found that the prenatal care was accessed late (24 weeks) in pregnancy, through multiple providers, and two outside LHJs. Seroconversion occurred shortly before delivery, which was one month after the initial prenatal visit and initial negative HIV test. System changes were proposed, including increased collaboration between LHJs and increased testing of high-risk pregnant individuals, and there have been no new subsequent maternal transmission cases reported. Mother and baby are both virally suppressed at this time. HEPATITIS C Hepatitis C infection (HCV) is largely attributed to the use of con taminated needles. Chronic HCV can lead to scarring of the liver, cirrhosis, liver failure and/or liver cancer. Across California the number of chronic Hepatitis C carriers continues to be unreliable due to variation in reporting capacities, changes in patient residences, and the high volume of duplicated positive lab tests. Consequently, Contra Costa’s Acute Communicable Disease (ACD) program reviews only a fraction of the reports and only follows extremely acute infections and those with a higher likelihood of yielding opportunities for contact intervention and transmission interruption. EXPOSURE IMPACT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND FIRST RESPONDERS Occupational exposure to needle stick injuries (Chart 2) for first responders remains low. The Communicable Disease Control Program is responsible for communicating the source person’s results with Occupational Health, but they do not advise on treatment or follow up. Communicable Disease Control remains available for consult as requested and printed materials are also available on the Syringe Exchange website: https://cchealth.org/hiv/syringe- exchange.php There were ten reported exposures in FY 20/21 and twenty in FY 21/22 among law enforcement and first responders, but none were from needle sticks: Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 5 of 24 NEEDLE EXCHANGE SERVICES: JANUARY 1, 2021- JUNE 30, 2022 All data below is supplied by Contra Costa’s needle exchange contractor, HIV Education Prevention Project of Alameda County (HEPPAC). HEPPAC has provided services in Contra Costa since 2013. Needle exchange services in the region rely on a combination of county general funds and other funding secured by the contractor through foundations and other organizations. HEPPAC’s budget funds portions of several staff salaries, including Community Heal th Promoters, a clerk, and the Harm Reduction Services Manager. The budget also funds supplies. HEPPAC’s service delivery and reporting continue to improve. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: Needle exchange is an essential service, so HEPPAC stayed open during COVID-19 related lockdowns. Fewer individuals came to the syringe exchange sites but the drop in the number of individuals served and total number of syringes distributed was minimal. In the January 2021—June 2022 reporting period, two COVID-19 variants (Delta and Omicron) affected the number of weekly clients accessing harm reduction services at HEPPAC needle exchange sites in West and East Contra Costa County. However, with the increase in vaccination rates across the county, HEPPAC was able to serve more individuals in FYs 20/21 and 21/22 as compared to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Table 1 shows an increase of 10% in this reporting period from FY 19/20. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, HEPPAC had to reconfigure their service delivery process. Before the pandemic, clients would line up to receive services; clients are now served using a “taco truck” method with one window to collect used syringes and take the client’s order and another window to give the client their syringes and other requested paraphernalia. Clients are asked to wear a mask and maintain social distancing. In FY 19/20, HEPPAC submitted a Social Distancing Protocol which was reviewed and approved by county staff and continues to be followed. Table 1: Race/Ethnicity Totals Over Time (Needle Exchange Program) Race/Ethnicity Totals Over Time FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 African American 376 734 689 White 1,720 1,668 1,709 Latino/Hispanic 342 319 299 Native American 9 3 6 Asian/Pacific Islander 11 4 8 Other 25 15 5 Total 2,483 2,743 2,716 Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 6 of 24 In this reporting period, West County residents exchanged a total of 20,884 used needles, which is higher than the previous two fiscal years. In East County, a similar increase was observed – East County residents exchanged a total of 152,990 used needles, which was also higher than the previous two fiscal years. These increases may be due to the easing up of COVID-19 restrictions. The upward trend is also evident when looking at needle exchange rates base d on race and ethnicity for African Americans. In this reporting period, an average of 711 African American individuals per fiscal year were served at needle exchange sites as compared to 376 in FY 19/20. However, for White clients, the opposite is true. A total of 1,720 White clients were served in FY 19/20 as compared to an average of 1,675 White clients in the two fiscal years included in this report (see Table 1). However, for reasons outlined here and later in this report, the number of used needles exchanged by African American clients (n=18,617) remained much lower than the amount by White clients (n=208,620). There is a notable difference in exchange behaviors: White clients report exchanging needles for secondary users at a much higher rate than do African American clients. In addition, the volume of White clients continues to grow in East County. Overall, the data reported by HEPPAC shows a continued shift toward increased utilization at the East Contra Costa site West County Harm Reduction Services: In FYs 20/21 and 21/22, HEPPAC reported an increase in the number of clients using harm reduction services in West Contra Costa County. This increase is due in large part to HEPPAC’s increased outreach efforts in the region, which included the work of the HEPPAC Community Health Promoters (CHPs) who scouted new areas throughout Richmond (roving sites) to increase visibility and identify areas requesting harm reduction services. Despite these efforts, most of these individuals are still primarily accessing harm reduction supplies other than syringes (safer smoking supplies, condoms, Narcan, etc.). This is evident in the huge increase in the number of African American clients, specifically in West County, from FY 19/20 to FYs 20/21 and 21/22 and the low number of needles exchanged by this population. One reported observation from HEPPAC is that African Americans tend to take other harm reduction supplies (i.e., condoms, hygiene/wound care, safer smoking supplies, etc.) instead of sterile needles . Another reason reported is that the physical site where services were being offered needs to be reevaluated to serve a higher percentage of African Americans who inject drugs. HEPPAC reports an increase in smoking as the modality of drug use rather than injecting, and this is another reason for the increase in African American clientele at harm reduction services. In this reporting period, HEPPAC also increased its efforts to create more access to Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) during Syringe Services Program (SSP) sites in East and West County with specific focus on increasing visibility in Richmond. The agency received a grant from the Sierra Health Foundation to increase PWID access to MAT at SSPs. With this funding, HEPPAC can hire Substance Use Navigators (SUNs) to assist in this effort by setting up Harm Reduction SSPs at sites that the County does not have the capacity to support. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 7 of 24 East County Harm Reduction Services: In East County the situation is different: Bay Point sites yield the highest volume of syringe exchanges in Contra Costa County. The average client utilizing harm reduction services in East County continues to be a White male between the ages of 40 -49. As demonstrated in Table 1, the percentage of clients who identify as White has remained stable over the past three fiscal years, and that population continues to be most needle exchange clients in the current fiscal year as well. New Trends Reported Among PWID: HEPPAC staff continue to report an increase in the number of countywide participants reporting use of prescription opioid pills that are crushed and modified for injection. This trend is reflective of national trends and may be a contributing factor in accidental overdose deaths. Another reported trend in drug using behavior during this reporting period is that many former PWID are turning more to smoking as opposed to injecting their new drug of choice: fentanyl. A study conducted by researchers from California and Washington state, published in 2021 in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence, found that many people who use drugs in San Francisco have been reducing their injection of heroin and other drugs and smoking more fentanyl instead.6 Study participants reported that smoking fentanyl, compared to injecting tar heroin and other opioids, helped them experience better highs, better health, reduced stigma, and improved quality of life. This trend speaks to the importance of continuing to offer safer smoking supplies at syringe exchange sites to reduce the risk of reuse/sharing and thus transmission of blood borne diseases such as HIV and Hepatitis C. Chart 3: Reported Number of Syringes Distributed by Fiscal Year 6 Transition from injecting opioids to smoking fentanyl in San Francisco, California Drug and Alcohol Dependence Volume 227, 1 October 2021, 109003. Reported Number of Syringes Distributed by Fiscal Year 200000 195000 190000 185000 180000 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 Fiscal Year (July-June) FY 21/22 Number of Syringes Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 8 of 24 In FYs 20/21 and 21/22, HEPPAC continued to provide effective harm reduction services including syringe exchange and overdose prevention services for East and West C ontra Costa County residents. These services include collection and disposal of used syringes, distribution of biohazard containers for disposal and future collection, one-on-one education, and intervention with clients to promote the use of clean syringes, provide clean syringes and other tools for safer use focused on PWIDs. In addition, the agency provides overdose prevention kits with Narcan to those that are at risk of overdose and their peers/family members that may need to administer the Narcan. Due to the increase in fentanyl in almost all the illicit street drugs, all drug users are at risk. HEPPAC continues to distribute fentanyl test strips at all sites to prevent overdose deaths among PWIDs. The permanent sites in East and West Contra Costa Count y are in the middle of overdose “hot spots” where harm reduction services are most needed. Referrals to Health and Social Services Another sign of rebounding from the COVID-19 pandemic was seen in the number of referrals made in FY 20/21 and FY 21/22 as compared to the previous year. HEPPAC reported a marked increase in health and social services referrals from 2,889 in FY 19/20 to an average of 3,153 per year in this reporting period. HEPPAC maintains strong linkages to health care providers, substance use treatment services, collaborative partnerships with other community agencies, and other resources. HEPPAC has an established relationship with the Contra Costa Health Care for the Homeless (HCH) program and provides them with harm reduction materials to distribute to clients, particularly at the Antioch Fulton Shipyard site. Syringe Disposal One important and often overlooked aspect of syringe exchange services programs is the actual disposal of used (formerly known as “dirty”) needles. HEPPAC’s modified needs-based model assures that disposal of used needles occurs every week. Agency staff measure the number of used needles they dispose of after every exchange by the size of the biohazard container they bring back to incinerate. HEPPAC uses containers that hold increments of 10, 50, 100, 250, 300, 1,200 and 5,000 used syringes. They also provide these containers to clients to take home and bring back full to exchange. If clients bring used needles in other containers, HEPPAC staff estimates based on the size compared to the biohazard containers. The collection and disposal of used needles occurs on a weekly basis and helps ensure that shared community spaces (i.e., playgrounds, parks, etc.) are free of used needles that may create a public health risk for county residents. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 9 of 24 Secondary Exchangers In Contra Costa County, there are individuals who access harm reduction services for themselves as well as on behalf of others. These individuals are called “secondary exchangers”. Secondary exchangers report the estimated number of individuals for whom they exchange syringes, summarized in Chart 4. The overall volume of secondary exchange has decreased over the past three fiscal years, which could be the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of secondary exchangers by race and region continues to be the same with White clients in East County accounting for most secondary exchangers reported. Because secondary exchangers attend needle exchange more than once in a year their numbers are dupli cated. The number of clients they exchange for is self-reported. Chart 4: Secondary Exchanges at Needle Exchange Services One key group of secondary exchangers with HEPPAC are the volunteers that make up the Martinez Harm Reduction Collective (MHRC). This is a group made up of Martinez residents that came together in 2019 to start harm reduction services in Martinez. In this reporting period, HEPPAC continued to provide technical assistance to MHRC in the form of training and supplies, including Narcan kits. In return, MHRC submits quarterly client service data to HEPPAC. MHRC provided weekly harm reduction services to an average of 35 residents per week at the Waterfront Park in the Martinez marina area. Challenges and Response In early May 2022, Health Services Alcohol and Other Drugs Program (AODS) received a formal complaint from a Martinez resident regarding used syringes/needles on the ground in Waterfront Park. The AODS Director reached out to the Health Services Public Health HIV Program who has a contract with HEPPAC for syringe exchange. The HIV Program contacted HEPPAC to clarify the syringe collection process being utilized by MHRC. HEPPAC confirmed that MHRC volunteers collect used syringes from clients at their weekly exchange site in Waterfront Park as well as provide clients with large sharps containers to keep the used needles and transport them back to the exchange site. In addition, MHRC volunteers reported that they educate every client to not discard used syringes on the ground and instead direct clients to the closest community site for disposal, either the sharps containers in the Waterfront Park’s bathrooms or the Mountainview Sanitation District in Martinez. The HIV Program Manager also spoke with a Supervisor at Martinez Public Works who confirmed that his staff has been finding and cleaning FY21/22 FY 20/21 FY 19/20 1497 1668 Secondary Exchanges at Needle Exchange Services Sites 3543 Total Clients Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 10 of 24 up used syringes/needles in the Waterfront Park since he has been working there, almost twenty years. However, he did report that there has been a higher volume of used syringes in the last four years and that the sharps containers in the park bathrooms get full and need to be emptied every two weeks by Public Works as part of their regular maintenance of the park facilities. While the investigation into the complaint about used needles was ongoing, the Interim Chief of Police for Martinez asked to meet with Health Services Public Health representatives to discuss concerns over used syringes/needles on the ground in Waterfront Park. Representatives from both AODS and Public Health met with the Interim Chief and provided him with data about the harm reduction services in Waterfront Park. The Interim Chief also inquired about how the services initially began and raised some questions about legal authority which were referred to County Counsel. Dr. Ori Tzvieli, Public Health Director, requested that HEPPAC pause syringe excha nge services in Martinez Waterfront Park while the Health Department and County Counsel review the legal questions as well as the contract with HEPPAC. MHRC was told that they can continue providing referrals, safer sex materials, and Narcan to their clients, but the group decided to pause all activities until advised otherwise. Clients in need of harm reduction services in Martinez are being referred to the Richmond or Bay Point sites, where HEPPAC staff can provide them with harm reduction services. The full impact of this pause on harm reduction activities in Martinez is unknown at the time of this report. Future Endeavors In response to the service disruption in Martinez, Health Services may decide to amend the contract with HEPPAC to include Central County as a service area for harm reduction services to be able to identify additional or alternate locations. If this is the case, the Public Health HIV Program will bring a resolution to a future FHS Committee meeting to describe any financial, legal, or logistical issues to increase HEPPAC’s capacity to serve Central County clients. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 11 of 24 Distribution Model Change During this reporting period, the model used in Contra Costa for syringe exchange was changed from a one-to-one model to a modified needs-based model per approval of the Board of Supervisors. To increase the return rate (the rate of returned used needles compared to new, sterile needles given out), HEPPAC proposed incentives for clients to bring back used needles. As a modified version of this model, HEPPAC offers various incentives for clients to bring back their used needles (i.e., giving them verbal praise, additional bio buckets, and when available, a $5 voucher for a Subway sandwich). HEPPAC staff report that verbal praise is the most useful strategy, since they let clients know how important their efforts are in keeping used syringes from littering shared, public spaces. HEPPAC staff also place a cap on the number of sterile needles and syringes to be received by each client based on their historical use. For example, if a client states that they need 25 needles per day and is given 350 needles for a two -week period, but at their next exchange encounter they report needing two or three times more needles, they will only receive their usual allotment of 350 needles. This example only applies to individuals exchanging for themselves and does not apply to secondary exchangers. HEPPAC staff have demonstrated their ability to get to know their clients and their use habits, as well as documenting previous exchanges. This information also helps HEPPAC determine the cap for each client. Given HEPPAC’s rapport with clients and in-depth knowledge of their use, creating and enforcing a cap has not been problematic for their staff. In the third quarter of the first fiscal year of this report, HEPPAC began to report the total number of new, sterile syringes given out and the total number of used syringes collected. According to the California State Office of AIDS, the average return rate for used syringes statewide is 60%. Contra Costa County’s HIV Prevention Program negotiated a return rate of 70% for HEPPAC in Contra Costa. The 70% return rate has been difficult for HEPPAC to achieve in the reporting period, and HEPPAC reported a return rate of 56%. HEPPAC has shifted focus on utilizing the incentives described above to get more clients to bring in their used needles. In addition, HEPPAC has increased the distribution and size of biohazard containers so that clients can bring back larger amounts of used needles. This is additionally important for clients that come monthly to the exchange sites since larger sharps containers can keep more used needles from being discarded in shared community settings. HEPPAC continues to distribute overdose prevention kits (naloxone) to individuals most likely to experience or witness opioid overdoses. Before a kit is given, the client receives education on how to use the kit. In FYs 20/21and 21/22, HEPPAC provided overdose education and prevention kits to a total of 1,217 clients (equivalent to 2,542 doses of Narcan). This represents a 61% increase from FY 19/20. Late in FY 21/22 there was a national shortage of nasal Narcan which affected HEPPAC’s ability to distribute Narcan at a high capacity as com pared to previous quarters. HEPPAC does provide intramuscular Narcan, however, clients prefer to have the nasal Narcan in the event of an overdose because it is easier and faster to use. Overall, HEPPAC is performing well and will continue to provide services in both East and West Contra Costa on a weekly basis. The Public Health program will continue to monitor and respond to the situation in Waterfront Park and is working diligently to restore harm reduction services in Martinez. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 12 of 24 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 FY 16/17 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 21/22 All Admissions Opioid Admissions ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG SERVICES (AODS) Admissions to AODS services (Chart 5) in this reporting period were up by 22.6% from FY 18/19. The increased enrollment is attributed to several factors, including an expansion of methadone treatment services due to increased admissions for opioid abuse treatment and increased access due to the Affordable Care Act. Admissions are not necessarily unduplicated individuals – one person may enter treatment multiple times during the year depending on the availability of treatment slots. Chart 5: All AODS Admissions and Opioid-Related Admissions* *Note: FYs vary slightly due to differences in reporting periods prior to COVID-19. FY 16/17 refers to July 2016-June 2017; 17/18 data was not able to be pulled because it was in another system; 19/20 refers to July 2019-December 2020; 21/22 refers to January 2021—June 2022. In the next reporting period, we will resume reporting on single year FYs from July-June. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 13 of 24 Total Clients Served IDU Served FY 21/22 FY 19/20 FY 18/19 FY 16/17 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Of the 5,337 admissions this reporting period (Jan 2021—June 2022), roughly 15.1% identified injection drug use behavior (Chart 6). The proportion of injection drug users to the overall population in AODS services has noticeably decreased compared to previous years: FY 16/17 (28%), FY 18/19 (24%), FY 19/20 (16%), FY 21/22 (10.4%). This trend may be attributed to the changing behaviors and the prevalence of fentanyl as detailed above. Chart 6: Total Clients Served and IDUs as a Proportion of all AOD Services* *Note: FYs vary slightly due to differences in reporting periods prior to COVID-19. FY 16/17 refers to July 2016-June 2017; 17/18 data was not able to be pulled because it was in another system; 19/20 refers to July 2019-December 2020; 21/22 refers to January 2021—June 2022. In the next reporting period, we will resume reporting on single year FYs from July-June. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 14 of 24 African American White Hispanic FY 20/21 FY 19/20 FY 18/19 FY 16/17 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 As seen in Chart 7, the overall percentage of African Americans enrolled in services has remained similar to previous years, representing 22% of those served in 2018/19, 19% in FY 19/20, and 21% in 2021/22. The percentage of Hispanics enrolled in services has decreased slightly, going from roughly 27% of those served in past years to 21% in 2021/22. Normally over half of service enrollees, White participants also decreased to 45% in 2021/22. Chart 7: Enrollment in AODS Sites over Time by Primary Race/Ethnicity* *Note: FYs vary slightly due to differences in reporting periods prior to COVID-19. FY 16/17 refers to July 2016-June 2017; 17/18 data was not able to be pulled because it was in another system; 19/20 refers to July 2019-December 2020; 21/22 refers to January 2021—June 2022. In the next reporting period, we will resume reporting on single year FYs from July-June. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 15 of 24 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 FY 16/17 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 Total Clients Served New (No Prior Enrollment) Nearly 44% of those served in FY 21/22 (Chart 8) are new enrollees, a slight decrease from 19/20, which was 47%. Chart 8: New Enrollees in AODS Services* *Note: FYs vary slightly due to differences in reporting periods prior to COVID-19. FY 16/17 refers to July 2016-June 2017; 17/18 data was not able to be pulled because it was in another system; 19/20 refers to July 2019-December 2020; 21/22 refers to January 2021—June 2022. In the next reporting period, we will resume reporting on single year FYs from July-June Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 16 of 24 Chart 9 shows a decrease in enrollees who reported being homeless at the time -of- service initiation. In FY 2018/19, 32% of total clients enrolled reported being homeless, in 19/20 it was 29%, and in 21/22 it was 23%. Chart 9: Homeless Proportion of Enrollment in AOD Services* *Note: FYs vary slightly due to differences in reporting periods prior to COVID-19. FY 16/17 refers to July 2016-June 2017; 17/18 data was not able to be pulled because it was in another system; 19/20 refers to July 2019-December 2020; 21/22 refers to January 2021—June 2022. In the next reporting period, we will resume reporting on single year FYs from July-June. AODS Program Highlights During this reporting period, AODS expanded its services network by adding two new Narcotic Treatment Programs (NTP) to provide Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorders: BAART Clinic in Concord and Harmonic Solutions in Walnut Creek. The BAART Concord Clinic and Antioch Clinic also provide HIV/HCV screening for clients as needed, and clients in need of treatment and other services receive on -site care and warm handoffs to the HIV/AIDS and STD Program. Beginning in April 2022, AODS fully integrated substance abuse counselors with the Medical Team in Detention Facilities to provide SUD treatment in the jail and linkages to SUD treatment post release. This effort also focuses on continuity of care post release to facilitate re -entry through recovery support services. AODS currently has two Nuevos Comienzos (New Beginnings) groups for Spanish speaking clients in need of lower-level SUD treatment. Nuevos Comienzos is an effort to address health inequities and the low utilization rate of SUD treatment in the Spanish speak ing population. AODS is also part of the larger community of harm reduction services in Contra Costa. They coordinate with the East Bay Harm Reduction coalition by distributing Narcan at needle exchange sites and engage clients into SUD treatment. AODS provides training and distribution of Naloxone across all Recovery Residences, also known as Sober Living Environments (SLE). Clients Reporting Homelessness Total Clients Served FY 21/22 FY 19/20 FY 18/19 FY 16/17 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 17 of 24 OTHER PREVENTION ACTIVITIES FOR INJECTION DRUG USE Opioid Agonist Therapy As abuse of prescription opioids rises and as more individuals inject drugs like heroin, the risk of increased blood borne illnesses such as HIV and Hepatitis C also increases. Their investigation of HIV prevention programs for injection drug users revealed that opioid agonist therapy (OAT) options, most commonly methadone and buprenorphine maintenance therapies, are the most cost effective. OAT options can also be highly effective in helping people stop injecting drugs over time and combining prevention efforts such as needle-syringe exchanges, OAT, Pre- Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), and prevention and testing with high -risk negatives have higher rates of success than standalone interventions.78 Contra Costa’s Choosing Change (CHOCH) initiative provides effective treatment for people who want to stop using opioids such as heroin, prescription painkillers like oxycodone, and similar drugs. The program provides buprenorphine medication combined with a group visit, recovery-focused therapy. Highlights from CHOCH during this reporting period include: • Currently offering 14 clinics associated with 6 health centers throughout Contra Costa County (see CHOCH Table 2 below) • Sublocade (long-acting) injectable form of buprenorphine now available weekly at the Miller Wellness Center in Martinez • Groups are currently being held via telehealth Zoom, with demonstrated success in engaging patients through this model of care • CHOCH referrals can be placed directly by CCHS system providers within ccLink or through the AODS Access line • For patients needing more intensive treatment, CHOCH can assist in connecting to inpatient and outpatient services • Substance Use Navigators stationed at CCRMC are associated with CHOCH and connect patients seen in the ED to program services 8 https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2017/05/study-identifies-cost-effective-ways-to-combat-hiv-risk.htm Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 18 of 24 Tables 2-4: Choosing Change Patient Demographics Table 2: Patients Served by Primary Clinic Table 3: Patients by Race Table 4: Patients with HIV Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 19 of 24 Alameda & Contra Costa County Integrated HIV Prevention & Care Plan Contra Costa County HIV/AIDS & STD program staff and Consortium members assisted in the development of the regional 2017 - 2021 Alameda & Contra Costa County Integrated HIV Prevention & Care Plan. Although the plan has not yet been updated for the next five years, it is referenced to evaluate care and prevention efforts in both counties. Key prevention components of the plan that focus on PWID include: 1. Through a collaboration involving the Oakland Transitional Grant Area (OTGA) Planning Council, the Contra Costa HIV Consortium, and the two county health departments, develop an End of AIDS Action Plan for the Oakland TGA that outlines steps to implement a collaborative, multidisciplinary campaign to end HIV in the two-county region, including ending new HIV infections, ending HIV-related deaths, and ending HIV related stigma. 2. Continually collect and report data on new HIV diagnoses in the OTGA, including breakdowns by ethnicity, gender, transmission category, and age. 3. Conduct ongoing needs assessments to identify emerging issues related to HIV infection and access to HIV education, testing, and other resources. 4. Deliver targeted, sustained, and evidence-based HIV prevention interventions that are appropriate for high-risk populations. 5. Support the development of expanded, tailored, HIV-related stigma reduction campaigns in English and Spanish that are aimed at specific, high-risk subpopulations and are developed in collaboration with consumers; that address stigma related to HIV, homophobia, and HIV risk behaviors; that incorporate cutting-edge social media approaches; and that contain sex- positive messages. 6. Utilize targeted social marketing, media, mobilization and condom distribution programs in English and Spanish to raise and sustain awareness of HIV risk. 7. Ensure widespread, accessible, and well-publicized syringe distribution and syringe exchange services. The Integrated HIV Prevention & Care Plan targets the highest risk populations including men who have sex with other men and injection drug users, for HIV prevention and care services. Needle exchange remains an integral component of the plan. In Contra Costa County, we anticipate continuing the use of County General Funds for needle exchange services to support the downward trend in HIV infections attributed to injection drug use. The current plan can be found on the Public Health website at http://cchealth.org/aids. Data-to-Care Programs Data-to-Care is a public health strategy that aims to use HIV and STD surveillance data to identify HIV-diagnosed individuals and those at highest risk for HIV not in care, link them to care. In this reporting period, the HIV/AIDS & STD Program continued to offer two data-to-care interventions that prioritize high-risk individuals: 1) targeted outreach to individuals who have been recently diagnosed with an STD, including individuals who are co -infected with HIV and STDs, and 2) a PrEP Navigation Program for county residents. PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) is the use of anti-retroviral medication to prevent acquisition of HIV infection. It is used by HIV-negative persons who are at high risk of being exposed to HIV. At Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 20 of 24 present, there are currently three medications with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication for PrEP that are either taken as a daily pill or by an injection and are both highly effective at protecting individuals from HIV. Both indications are approved for both adults and adolescents ages 12 and over who weigh at least 35 kilograms (77 pounds). Truvada® and Descovy® for PrEP At present, there are two medications with an FDA-approved indication for daily use PrEP: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine, which is available as a fixed-dose combination in a tablet called Truvada® and emtricitabine & tenofovir alafenamide tenofovir, which is available in a fixed-dose combination in a tablet called Descovy®. When taken daily, studies have shown that both Truvada® and Descovy® reduce the risk of getting HIV from sex by about 99% and by at least 74% among people who inject drugs.9 Both medications are also commonly used in the treatment of HIV. The main difference is that Descovy® for PrEP is recommended to prevent HIV for people at risk through sex, excluding people at risk through receptive vaginal sex. Descovy® has not yet been studied for HIV prevention for receptive vaginal sex, so it may not be appropriate for some people. Injectable PrEP On December 20, 2021, the FDA approved one injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) medication: cabotegravir (CAB) 600 mg (brand name Apretude®). CAB is a single antiretroviral drug given as an intramuscular injection every 2 months to prevent HIV. CAB is approved for cisgender men, transgender women, and cisgender women. CAB injections may be a good option for PrEP for people who: • Have problems taking oral PrEP as prescribed. • Prefer getting a shot every 2 months instead of taking oral PrEP. • Have serious kidney disease that prevents use of oral PrEP medications. CAB is FDA approved as an intramuscular injection in the buttocks initiated as a first injection followed by a second injection 1 month after the first and then continued with an injec tion every 2 months thereafter. A 4-week lead-in period of 30 mg daily oral CAB prior to the first injection is optional for patients who are worried about side effects. All forms of PrEP should be considered as part of a comprehensive prevention plan that includes adherence, risk reduction counseling, HIV prevention education and provision of condoms and requires follow-up with a provider to assess for HIV and STI testing at regular intervals The Line List targeted outreach intervention consists of generating lists that are pulled from State and County surveillance systems. These line lists are focused on three high - risk populations: MSMs recently diagnosed with one or more STD, women of color (African American and Latinas) recently diagnosed with one or more STD, and individuals co-infected with HIV and STD(s). Trained Disease Intervention Technicians (DITs) call the individuals on the line lists and offer risk reduction services, partner services, and, in the case of people who do not have HIV, Pre - Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) navigation services. In this reporting period, DITs provided risk reduction services to a total of 624 individuals (594 HIV negative and 30 PLHIV). 9 https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prep.html Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 20 of 24 OPIOID OVERDOSE Opioids are medications that relieve pain. They reduce the intensity of pain signals reaching the brain, diminishing the effects of a painful stimulus. Medications that fall within this class include hydrocodone (e.g., Vicodin), oxycodone (e.g., OxyContin, Percocet), morphine (e.g., Kadian, Avinza), codeine, and related drugs. Hydrocodone products are the most prescribed for a variety of painful conditions, including dental and injury-related pain. Morphine is often used before and after surgical procedures to alleviate severe pain. Codeine is often prescribed for mild pain. In addition to their pain-relieving properties, some of these drugs—codeine and diphenoxylate (Lomotil) for example—can be used to relieve coughs or severe diarrhea. Heroin is an opioid drug that is synthesized from morphine. In 2020, 902,000 Americans reported using heroin in the past year, a number that has been on the rise since 2007. The greatest increase in heroin use has been seen in young adults 18- 25.10 Chart 10: Past Heroin Use among People Aged 12 or Older (2017—2020) 10 https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/heroin/scope-heroin-use-in-united-states Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 22 of 24 Data from 2011 showed that nearly 80% of Americans using heroin report misusing prescription opioids first, and it is estimated that about 23% of individuals who use heroin become dependent on it.11 Prescription opioid pain medications such as Oxycontin and Vicodin can have effects similar to heroin when taken in doses or in ways other than prescribed, and they are currently among the most commonly abused drugs in the United States. The California Department of Health reported 5,502 opioid -related overdose deaths in 2020 and 6,843 in 2021, this marks a steady rise since 2018 when 2,428 were reported.12 In Contra Costa County, there were 144 opioid deaths in 2020 and 180 in 2021,13 which is a marked increase from the 84 opioid overdose deaths reported in 2018.14 All regions of the county have experienced fatal overdoses, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations due to opioid overdose. Recognizing the life-saving effects of the opioid-overdose reversal drug naloxone, Senate Bill (SB) 833 (Chapter 30, Statutes of 2016) established a new Naloxone Grant Program within the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).15 The goal of the program was to reduce fatal overdoses by increasing access to naloxone nasal spray called Narcan. In 2017-2019, the HIV/AIDS and STD Program administered the Naloxone Grant Program by distributing the county’s 1,642 State-allotted doses to local community agencies with existing naloxone distribution systems and those working with individuals most likely to experience or witness opioid overdoses. After this successful pilot program, the California Department of Health Care Services began providing free naloxone directly to organizations and entities. DISPOSAL Contra Costa Environmental Health (CCEH) administers the Medical Waste Management Program for Contra Costa County and is the local enforcement and regulatory agency for Medical Waste Generators. CCEH issues permits and registers generators of medical waste, responds to complaints of abandoned medical waste on public property, and implements the Medical Waste Management Act (Part 14, C. 1-11 of the California Health and Safety Code). The agency web site maintains a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on syringe and needle disposal, a list of disposal sites in Contra Costa, several pamphlets describing the proper disposal of syringes and other medical waste, as well as links to state and other resources. Additional information can be found at https://cchealth.org/eh/medical-waste/faq.php and https://safeneedledisposal.org/search-results/ . 11 http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/heroin 12 https://skylab.cdph.ca.gov/ODdash/?tab=Home 13 2021 data is preliminary and may increase slightly. 14 https://pdop.shinyapps.io/ODdash_v1/ 15 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/SACB/Pages/NaloxoneGrantProgram.aspx Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 23 of 24 The Public Health HIV/AIDS and STD program has received one complaint from a community member regarding discarded syringes on the ground this year as reported earlier. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Sheriff's Substation - New 2500 Alhambra Ave., Martinez Accepts all household pharmaceutical waste Open to all residents Monday - Friday 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. CCC Sheriff's Field Accepts all household Monday - Friday 8 a.m. – Operations Building - New pharmaceutical waste 5 p.m. 1980 Muir Road, Open to all residents Martinez Walnut Creek City Hall - New 1666 North main Street, Walnut Creek West County Household Hazardous Waste Facility 101 Pittsburg Ave., Richmond Delta Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility 2500 Pittsburg - Antioch Highway, Pittsburg Accepts all household pharmaceutical waste Open to all residents Accepts non-controlled household pharmaceutical waste Open to West County residents only Accepts non-controlled household pharmaceutical waste. Open to East County residents only Monday - Friday 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. Thursday, Friday, and First Saturday of every month 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. (Closed 12 - 12:30 p.m. for lunch) Thursday, Friday, and Saturday 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. Contra Costa Health Services Needle Exchange Update Report to Family & Human Services Committee October 2022 Page 24 of 24 CONCLUSIONS: 1. Access to new, sterile syringes/needles has made a difference in Contra Costa and remains an important component of the overall strategy to reduce transmission of blood borne diseases. 2. Law enforcement exposure to potential blood borne pathogens via needle stick injury has not increased with the implementation of needle exchange and pharmacy sales. Materials for Law Enforcement to document potential exposure and request assistance are available on the website. 3. Needle exchange is a critical component and essential service of Contra Costa’s HIV prevention strategy and should remain in effect until further notice. Needle exchange is also the primary strategy that addresses Contra Costa’s opioid epidemic by increasing naloxone access and linking people to substance use treatment programs. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Needle Exchange Update report from the Public Health Division of the Health Services Department, as received and approved by the Family and Human Services Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The HIV Prevention/Needle Exchange program was referred to the Family and Human Services Committee (FHS) in October 2002. The issue was discussed four times during 2003 and was subsequently closed. The referral was then re-opened on January 4, 2005 for annual reporting to FHS. At the December 18, 2014 FHS meeting, Referral #61 - HIV Prevention/Needle Exchange Program - was converted to a biennial FHS report with direction to the department to submit a report directly to the Board of Supervisors in the intervening years. Additionally, in December 14, 2015, FHS received a report on the Program and recognized the incidents of HIV and AIDS had significantly decreased. Therefore, FHS felt that a biennial report to the Committee was sufficient. The Committee also advised staff to return to FHS at any time should the exposure data significantly change. At its October 24, 2022 meeting, the Family and Human Services Committee received and approved the attached report from the Public Health Division of the Health Services Department and directed staff to forward it to the Board of Supervisors for its information. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The report will not be received. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Enid Mendoza, (925) 655-2051 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 98 To:Board of Supervisors From:FAMILY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:HIV Prevention Needle Exchange Program Update CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speaker: Caller 6770. ATTACHMENTS Needle Exchange Program Update RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District ("District"), including the List of Designated Positions. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The District has amended its Conflict of Interest Code and submitted the revised code, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant to Government Code sections 87306 and 87306.5. The code has been revised to update the disclosure categories and the list of designated positions. These changes will ensure that the Conflict of Interest Code accurately reflects the current positions and organizational structure of the District. The changes are shown on the red-line version, attached as Exhibit B. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, Michelle Lacey, General Manager, Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District C. 99 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Conflict of Interest Code of the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - Conflict of Interest Code of the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Exhibit B - Conflict of Interest Code of the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District - REDLINE   1 of 3    Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission 2022 ANNUAL REPORT and 2023 WORK PLAN     2022 annual report   The current members of the Sustainability Commission are:    Mike Moore, Member, District 3, Chair  Nick Despota, Member, District 1, Vice‐Chair  Shoshana Wechsler, Alternate, District 1  Victoria Smith, Member, District 2  Christopher Easter, Alternate, District 2  Mike Moore, Member, District 3  Samantha Moy, Alternate, District 3  Wes Sullens, Member, District 4    Brandon Matson, Alternate, District 4  Charles Davidson, Member, District 5  Renee Fernandez‐Lipp, Alternate, District 5  Howdy Goudey, At‐Large, Community Group  Luz Gomez, At‐Large, Community Group  Chuck Leonard, At‐Large, Business  Marisha Farnsworth, At‐Large, Business  Isabella Zizi, Environmental Justice  Kim Hazard, At‐Large, Education    The Commission meets the fourth Monday in February, April, June, August, October, and December.1   Demian Hardman‐Saldana, Senior Planner, is lead staff. All members have completed the mandatory  training. Kim Hazard is the Sustainability Commission representative to the County’s Integrated Pest  Management Advisory Committee.     The Chair and other members of the Commission participate in meetings of the Board of Supervisors’  Sustainability Committee. The Commission receives briefings from County staff and representatives of  other agencies and groups on a range of issues related to the County’s Climate Action Plan. Below is a  summary of the Commission’s work in 2022.     Topic  Accomplishments  Commission  Definition of  “Sustainability”   The Commission meet at its February, June, and August meeting to develop a  definition of “Sustainability” based on information presented by a Commission  working group formed in 2021. At its August meeting, the Commission  developed a definition of “Sustainability” that was approved to be used  internally by the Commission.    Green Buildings  At its February meeting, a working group of the Commission provided an update  on additional research on low‐carbon concrete.  Based on the report from the  working group, the Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors  direct staff to study adoption of low‐carbon concreate standards.  General Plan  Update  At its April meeting, the Commission reviewed and provided input on the Draft  Sustainability Goals, Policies and Actions for the General Plan.   County Public  Works Distributed  At its June meeting, the Commission received a report from the County’s Energy  Manager on the Distributed Energy Resource Plan for County Public Buildings,    1 The December meeting is earlier in the month.      2 of 3    Topic  Accomplishments  Energy Resource  Plan  including the plan for installing more electric vehicle charging stations at County  facilities.      Environmental  Bond Financing  Standards   At its June meeting, the Commission received a report from the Chief Assistant  County Administrator, on the environmental, social and governmental (ESG)  standards used in finance to safeguard the environment.    Health Impacts  from Climate  Change  At its June meeting, the Commission received a report from the Chief Climate  and Health Policy Officer on the County’s work on the human health impacts  associated with climate change.    Climate Action  Plan Update  At its June meeting, the Commission received a detailed report on the status of  the Climate Action Plan update.  At its December meeting, the Commission  received an update on the Interim Climate Action Work Plan for 2023‐2024. The  County’s Sustainability Coordinator also provides regular status reports at each  meeting on the ongoing update of the County’s Climate Action Plan.    Building  Electrification   At its August meeting, Sustainability planning staff provided a report on the  County’s work on building electrification for existing buildings.  The Commission  also received a report at its December meeting on the development of a  roadmap for converting existing residential buildings to be all‐electric.    County  Investment Policy  At its October meeting, the Commission received a report from the County  Treasurer‐Tax Collector on the County’s investment policy.    Climate Change  Legislation  At its October meeting, the Commission also received a report on the major  legislation passed by Congress to address climate change, such as the  Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act.  Just Transition  At its December meeting, the Commission received a report from the County’s  Economic Development Manager on submittal of Just Transition Economic  Revitalization Plan Grant Materials.  Climate  Emergency  Resolution  The Commission receives a status report on implementation of the Climate  Emergency Resolution as part of the standing item of the Sustainability  Coordinator’s report at every meeting.   2023 Work Plan The Commission will continue to report to the Ad Hoc Committee on Sustainability, as well as to the full  Board. Projects and initiatives related to the Climate Action Plan on which the Commission anticipates it  may advise the Board of Supervisors and staff include:  • General Plan Update, particularly integrating equity and environmental justice  • Climate Action Plan update  • Issues in the Climate Action Plan, including water conservation and drought; land use and  public transportation, including pedestrian and bicycle access; energy efficiency and  renewable energy; and recycling and composting.   • Implementation of the Climate Emergency Resolution   • Increasing resilience to climate‐related disasters and incidents, including the Adapting to Rising  Tides studies for Eastern Contra Costa County and the Bay Area region, wildfires, and Public Safety  Power Shutoffs  • Review of Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan  • County investment policy to eliminate investment in fossil fuel companies.      3 of 3    • Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint implementation  • Advocacy on issues related to the Climate Action Plan  • Potential health impacts of climate change (i.e., wildfires)  • Building electrification of existing buildings  • Low‐Carbon Concrete Policy   • Outreach and education on sustainability to Contra Costa County residents and businesses  RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan, as recommended by the Sustainability Commission. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1, which requires each advisory board, commission, or committee to report annually to the Board of Supervisors on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. The Sustainability Commission also includes as part of its report an annual update on the County's progress in meeting the goals of the County's 2015 Climate Action Plan. The attached report presented for Board consideration was approved by the Sustainability Commission on December 12, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to adopt the Annual Report and Work Plan of the Sustainability Commission means the annual reporting requirement to the Board of Supervisors would not be fulfilled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Demian Hardman-Saldana, 925-655-2816 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.100 To:Board of Supervisors From:Jody London, Sustainability Coordinator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Sustainability Commission 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan ATTACHMENTS Sustainability Commission 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE amended list of designated positions for the Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District ("District"). FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The District has amended the list of designated positions in its Conflict of Interest Code and submitted the revised list, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant to Government Code sections 87306 and 87306.5. The changes include the addition and deletion of positions designated to file conflict of interest statements. These changes will ensure that the Conflict of Interest Code accurately reflects the current positions and organizational structure in use by the District. A red-lined version of the list of designated positions is attached as Exhibit B. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Lewis Broschard, Fire Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District C.101 To:Board of Supervisors From:Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - CCCFPD COI Code Designated Positions Exhibit B - CCCFPD COI Designated Positions REDLINED Advisory Body Name: Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location: Chair (during the reporting period): Staff Person (during the reporting period): Reporting Period: I. Activities (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the activities for the past year including areas of study, work, special events, collaborations, etc. ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT II. Accomplishments (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the accomplishments for the past year, particularly in reference to your work plan and objectives. III.Attendance/Representation (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe your membership in terms of seat vacancies, diversity, level of participation, and frequency of achieving a quorum at meetings. Describe the advisory body's workplan, including specific objectives to be achieved in the upcoming year. V. Proposed Work Plan/Objectives for Next Year IV. Training/Certification (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe any training that was provided or conducted, and any certifications received, either as a requirement or done on an elective basis by members. NOTE: Please forward copies of any training certifications to the Clerk of the Board. (estimated response length: 1/2 page) RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report from the Economic Opportunity Council (EOC) Advisory Board for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1, which requires that each regular and ongoing board, commission, or committee annually report to the Board of Supervisors on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training, certification programs, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. The attached report was approved by the Economic Opportunity Council (EOC) at its December 1, 2022 regular EOC Business Meeting. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The EOC Advisory Board would be out of compliance with Resolution No. 2020/1. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. Pacheco 925-608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.102 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:2022 Economic Opportunity Council Advisory Body Annual Report ATTACHMENTS Advisory Body Annual Report December 1, 2022 Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects Project No.Board Date Grant Recipient Project Smart Growth Action Plan Goal District I District II District III District IV District V Total Expenditures* Remaining Balance Rate of Expenditure 1,766,549$ 379,458$ 450,000$ 1,803,977$ 465,000$ 2,517,887.08$ 2,197,096.56$ 52% 2022-13 11/1/2022 CCTA Northern Waterfront Ferry 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ 0% 2022-12 10/11/2022 PWD Pedestrian Signage - Blackhawk Rd 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 6,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,000$ -$ 100% 2022-11 10/4/2022 Mt. Diablo Unified Educatering 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 0% 2022-10 10/4/2022 Choice in Aging Aging in Place Campus 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ -$ -$ 490,590$ -$ -$ 490,590$ 0% 2022-09 9/20/2022 Monument Crisis Center Family Resource Center 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% 2022-08 6/21/2022 City of Orinda Orinda Community Park Master Plan - Conceptual Design 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 0% 2022-07 6/21/2022 The Lafayette Park Trust Lafayette Theater Project 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 0% 2022-06 6/21/2022 Moraga Community Foundation Moraga Commons Enhancement 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 0% 2022-05 5/10/2022 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2022/23 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 100% 2022-04 5/10/2022 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2021/22 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 100% 2022-03 5/10/2022 Clayton Community Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 2022-02 5/10/2022 Walnut Creek Library Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% 2022-01 5/10/2022 Pleasant Hill Library Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% 2020-02 12/15/2020 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2020/21 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 100% 2020-01 9/22/2020 Community HSG Dev. Corp. NR Heritage Point Commercial 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 505,336$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 505,336$ 0% 2019-08 10/22/2019 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2019/20 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 100% 2019-07 7/30/2019 DCD District V Code Enforcement 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 100% 2019-06 7/30/2019 PWD PWD - Beautification Bay Point 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 100% 2019-05 7/30/2019 Sheriff's Office Bay Point Resident Deputy Program 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ 100% 2019-04 6/18/2019 Innovation Tri Valley 2040 Tri Valley Vision Plan Investment 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 100% 2019-03 3/26/2019 RYSE Center RYSE Center Capital Expansion 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 51,174$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 51,174$ -$ 100% 2019-02 3/26/2019 PWD RYSE Acq. - Phase 2 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 42,500$ -$ -$ -$ 42,500$ -$ 100% 2019-01 1/15/2019 PWD Friends of the El Sobrante Library 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 15,045$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,045$ -$ 100% 2018-07 12/18/2018 Choice in Aging Infrastructure Workforce Development 1. Clean up land for redevelopment and create jobs near existing housing.-$ -$ -$ 13,200$ -$ 13,200$ -$ 100% 2018-06 12/4/2018 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2018/19 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 100% Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 2018-05 6/12/2018 PWD RYSE Acq. - Phase 1 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ 100% 2018-04 3/27/2018 Innovation Tri Valley Tri Valley Rising Report 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 100% 2018-03 3/27/2018 PWD Newell Avenue Pathway 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ 100% 2018-02 2/27/2018 H3 Contra Costa Housing Security Fund 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 100% 2018-01 1/16/2018 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2017/18 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 100% 2017-03 9/19/2017 Garden Park Apartments Community Garden Park Apartments 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 100% 2017-02 3/14/2017 Mobility Matters Rides for Veterans 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 33,458$ -$ 50,187$ -$ 83,645$ -$ 100% 2017-01 3/7/2017 Aglantis Agra Tech Solar Light Greenhouse 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ -$ 100% 2016-03 12/20/2016 DCD Agriculture Policy Study 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 113,829.44$ 36,170.56$ 76% 2016-02 12/20/2016 DCD Marsh Creek Trail 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ 100% 2016-01 6/14/2016 CHDC Heritage Point Apartments 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals 927,494$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 927,494$ -$ 100% 2013-01 10/22/2013 DCD Northern Waterfront 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000.00$ -$ 100% 1,766,549$ 379,458$ 450,000$ 1,803,977$ 465,000$ 2,517,887.08$ 2,197,096.56$ 52% * Reflects expenditures made by DCD, including payments to other County departments or non-profit organizations. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract, subject to approval by the County Administrator and approval as to form by County Counsel, with YES Nature to Neighborhoods, a private non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $150,000, for the non-construction design costs related to the renovation and expansion of permanent office space located at 3029 MacDonald Avenue in the City of Richmond, for the period of January 1, 2023 through August 31, 2025, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. FISCAL IMPACT: No General Fund Impact. The $150,000 required for the contract will come from the District I allocation of the deposits into the Livable Communities Trust (Fund). The current available balance in the District I portion of the Fund is $195,202.07 (this total does not reflect the proposed $150,000 allocation). BACKGROUND: The Livable Communities Trust Fund (Fund) is a Special Revenue Mitigation Fund that was established by the Board of Supervisors on November 15, 2005, following the approval of the Camino Tassajara Combined General Plan Amendment Project, also known as the Alamo Creek and Intervening Property residential projects, and was required as a condition of approval. The Fund was established to implement the County's Smart Growth Action Plan. The residential developers pay an $8,000 per unit fee (excluding the affordable housing portions of the projects) into the Fund. The Department of Conservation and Development administers the Fund. On December 3, 2013, the Board of Supervisors determined that revenue from the Fund should be spent equally among supervisorial districts. At complete build-out, deposits to the Fund will total $8,448,000. As of December 16, 2022, the account has collected $8,376,000 in revenue fees, and $932,753.57 in accrued interest with $4,383,769.93 remaining in uncommitted funds. The approved expenditures to date are attached. As recommended by Supervisor Gioia, $150,000 is proposed to be awarded to YES Nature to Neighborhoods (YES) organization. YES is a non-profit organization in the City of Richmond that provides various youth, adult, and family programs with a mission of nurturing leaders, in partnership with nature, that champion the wellbeing of their community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristin Sherk 925-655-2889 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.103 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Allocation of Funds from the Livable Communities Trust to YES Nature to Neighborhoods BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Funds will be used for non-construction design costs to renovate and expand YES's permanent office space including the creation of indoor and outdoor spaces that will serve the needs of the community participants and staff for years to come. The office space has served as YES's administrative offices and community home base since 2012. Once the renovations are complete, onsite services will include environmental education, leadership workshops, and advocacy trainings. Other services may include field trip orientation to nearby nature and wild spaces, registration for YES outings including summer and family camps, graduations, and community partner meetings. While the total project cost for the renovations will exceed the Fund allocation, the recommended $150,000 will pay for the non-construction design costs. The total cost of the YES renovation campaign is approximately $3.0 million, of which $1.33 million is estimated for construction, and $839,000 is estimated for architectural/engineering and related soft costs. As proposed, the architectural design phase is estimated to be completed in Summer 2023. Building permit and construction documents are estimated to take 6-9 months leading up to construction beginning Spring 2024. Construction is expected to take up to 9 months with completion late 2024 or early 2025. The YES Nature to Neighborhoods project supports Smart Growth Action Plan goal number four: To promote economic revitalization in urban infill communities. ATTACHMENTS LCT Project List RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller or designee, to pay $51,508 to Cintas Corporation for janitorial supplies, parts, uniforms, minor equipment, standard rental products used for cleaning; cubicle and shower curtains; repair and labor for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers during the period of January 4, 2022 through March 29, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in a one-time expenditure in an amount not to exceed $51,508 and will be funded entirely by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: On January 19, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.48, to execute an amendment to Purchase Order #15283 with Cintas Corporation to increase the payment limit by $201,000 to a new payment limit of $400,000 for the purchase of janitorial supplies, minor equipment, as well as repair and labor for the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period of August 1,2020 through December 31, 2021. Due to an administrative oversight, during the period of January 4, 2022 through March 29, 2022 the department continued to purchase supplies and services from this vendor, without having an authorized agreement in place for the purchase of such goods or services. The amount due to the vendor for the invoices during that period is approximately $51,508. To rectify this administrative oversight moving forward, CCRMC Environmental Services collaborated with the County Purchasing division to ensure all supplies, rentals, repairs, etc. needed by the unit were included in a County authorized agreement. On March 22, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.53 to execute a blanket purchase order (#24764) on behalf of the County and participating addendum with Cintas Corporation No. 2, in an amount not to exceed $650,000 for facility management products and solutions, including garment rental and laundry services, fire and safety products, first aid products and janitorial products, during APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jose Bustillos, (925) 370-5450 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.104 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Products and Services provided by Cintas Corporation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the period from March 22, 2022 through October 31, 2023. The agreement falls under the terms of a master contract awarded by the Prince William County Public School Board, as recommended by the Public Works Director, and includes the supplies, rentals, repairs, etc. needed by the department. Cintas is an awarded supplier on both the Vizient Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) contract portfolio and the Omnia Partners contract portfolio. The current agreement does not cover the period of January 4, 2022 through March 29, 2022, and staff have determined that the vendor is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of the products and services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. The theory provides that where a vendor has been asked to provide products and services without a valid contract, and the vendor does so to the benefit of the County, the vendor is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those products and services. Since the department cannot pay Cintas for products and services rendered as they lack the necessary instrument to issue payment, this request is for the Board to authorize the Auditor--Controller to issue a one-time payment to the vendor in an amount not to exceed $51,508. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, Cintas Corporation will not be paid for products and services rendered in good faith. ATTACHMENTS Advisory Body Name: Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location: Chair (during the reporting period): Staff Person (during the reporting period): Reporting Period: I. Activities (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the activities for the past year including areas of study, work, special events, collaborations, etc. ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT II. Accomplishments (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the accomplishments for the past year, particularly in reference to your work plan and objectives. III.Attendance/Representation (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe your membership in terms of seat vacancies, diversity, level of participation, and frequency of achieving a quorum at meetings. Describe the advisory body's workplan, including specific objectives to be achieved in the upcoming year. V. Proposed Work Plan/Objectives for Next Year IV. Training/Certification (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe any training that was provided or conducted, and any certifications received, either as a requirement or done on an elective basis by members. NOTE: Please forward copies of any training certifications to the Clerk of the Board. (estimated response length: 1/2 page) RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report from the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1, which requires that each advisory board, commission, or committee report annually to the Board on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. This item fulfills that requirement for the Commission for Women and Girls. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Commission for Women and Girls will not fulfill the requirements of Resolution 2020/1. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauren Hull, (925) 655-2007 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.105 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:2022 Annual Report of the Commission for Women and Girls ATTACHMENTS 2022 Annual Report Contra Costa County UNPAID STUDENT TRAINING AGREEMENT Number 72-195 1. Contract Identification. Department: Health Services- Public Health Division Subject: Unpaid student training agreement with Department, sponsored by Contractor 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOR ITS COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH Capacity: Educational Institution Address: 13201 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33612 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is February 1, 2023 , and it terminates January 31, 2025 , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, at its sole discretion, upon seven-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or canceled immediately by written mutual consent, subject to termination conditions (if any) set forth in the Program Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5. Program. By this Agreement, County agrees to permit unpaid student training of persons (“Participants”) sponsored by Contractor under the following conditions: a. Services provided under this Agreement are volunteer services, and Participants obtain no employment rights with, or employment benefits from, the County, by virtue of this Agreement or service hereunder. Each Participant agrees to the foregoing and must execute the Unpaid Student Training Participation Agreement form attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. b. Contract terms and conditions are expressed in the Program Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 6. Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 7. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless County and its officers and employees from any and all claims, costs and liability for any damages, sickness, death or injury to person or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from or connected with the operation or services provided hereunder by Contractor, its agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, students, or the Participants as described herein, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of County or its officers or employees. 8. Legal Authority. This Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authority: California Government Code § 26227. 9. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties’ agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By By Designee Recommended by Department (Designate official capacity) By Designee (Form approved by County Counsel) PROGRAM PLAN Number 72–195 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -1- 1. Purpose of the Program. University of South Florida, (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”) conducts a public health training program for its public health students, in cooperation with County’s Department. The Contractor desires to have its nursing students enrolled in this program to receive field experience and instruction from the County, and the County is willing to provide such experience and instruction under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Therefore, the parties will undertake a program whereby such instruction and experience will be provided in accordance with this Agreement (Program), mutually agreed to by the parties. 2. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall: a. Designate public health students for participation in the Program conducted pursuant to this Agreement (Participants); b. Suggest dates for the field experience, and cooperate with County’s Department in establishing assignment schedules consisting of specific dates for the placement of a specific number of Participants with the County for training; c. Assign for field experience, only those Participants who are considered adequate by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto; d. Make all necessary arrangements so that each Participant will: (1) Have completed all the necessary courses required by the Contractor as preparation for said field experience; (2) Execute the County’s Unpaid Student Training Participant Agreement (attached as Exhibit A) upon referral to the training Program; (3) Arrange for their own transportation to and from the Health Services Department, and for maintenance and housing during field instruction; (4) Channel educational problems to the appropriate instructor(s) in Contractor’s school; (5) Promptly report any illnesses and absences from duty; and (6) Comply with regulations and standards of conduct governing professional personnel in the County Health Services Department. e. Agree to have each Participant furnish to County, upon request, such evidence as Contractor may require showing that the Participant assigned for training is physically, psychologically and/or medically fit. If Contractor needs to provide any confidential medical information regarding Participant, County will have Participant sign a release for such information and forward the release to Contractor; and f. Provide County with evidence that the Contractor has in full force and effect, during the term of this Agreement, general liability insurance for Participants designated for participation pursuant to this Agreement with coverage of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for the activities of the Participants pursuant to this Agreement. PROGRAM PLAN Number 72–195 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -2- g. Contractor will retain ultimate responsibility for the education of its students. The Contractor’s representative for this Agreement will be a faculty member appointed and assigned by the Contractor, as liaison to the County. 3. County’s Obligations. County shall: a. Comply with all State statutes and regulations applicable to the training of Participants enrolled in the Program; b. Accept for field experience those Participants assigned by the Contractor for such a period and in such numbers as may be mutually agreed in writing; c. Provide the Participants with learning experiences needed to meet the objectives of the training Program, which will be mutually agreed to by the parties in accordance with this Agreement; d. Have the right to terminate the participation of any Participant in the field experience for failure to follow the instructions of County, or for any other lawful reason. In the event of such termination, County shall give prompt written notice to the Contractor; and e. Comply with applicable state and federal workplace safety laws and regulations. In the event a Participant is exposed to an infectious or environmental hazard or other occupational injury (i.e. needle stick) while at the County, the County, upon notice of such incident from the student, will provide such emergency care as is provided to its employees or students, where applicable. 4. Joint Obligations. County and Contractor shall jointly: a. Plan the student-training Program, including course content and Participant assignment schedule, so as to provide a sound and effective educational Program; b. Review the Program at the end of each training period in order to evaluate progress and recommend changes for the next consecutive training period; and c. Plan for periodic review of this Agreement. 5. Participants’ Obligations. Contractor shall ensure that its Participants: a. Execute the County’s Unpaid Student Training Participant Agreement (attached as Exhibit A hereto) upon referral to the training Program; b. Abide by County policies and regulations; c. Conduct themselves in an appropriate professional manner consistent with responsibility; d. Observe and respect patient’s rights, privacy, and dignity; and e. Comply with applicable County, State, and Federal regulations respecting disclosure of patients’ health information and access to, and removal of, medical records and/or information contained therein. PROGRAM PLAN Number 72–195 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -3- 6. Contractor, County and Participant Agreement. Participants are not entitled to reimbursement by County for expenses associated with the use of personal vehicles while engaged in the training Program covered by this Agreement. Participants are not entitled to any compensation from County during their participation in Contractor’s training Program. Participants may receive course credit from Contractor for their participation in the training Program covered by this Agreement. EXHIBIT A Contra Costa County UNPAID STUDENT TRAINING PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT The County of Contra Costa (“County”) and the Participant named below agree as follows: 1. Participant will engage in training for a County department pursuant to a contract between the County and a contractor sponsoring the Participant, hereinafter the “Training Program.” 2. Participant agrees that in connection with Training Program, Participant is a volunteer, and will obtain no employment rights or employment benefits from the County and waives any claim to any employment rights or employment benefits from the County based upon Participant's training services, whether or not authorized under such contract. Participant is not entitled to any monetary compensation or expense reimbursement from County for participation in Training Program; Participant acknowledges that his/her participation in the Training Program is for his/her personal benefit and solely for educational purposes, and that he/she may receive course credit from the educational institution at which he/she is enrolled. 3. Participant further agrees that he/she has read and understands the Unpaid Student Training Agreement (identified in paragraph 8, below) between the County and Participant's sponsoring contractor. 4. County or Participant may terminate this agreement upon three day's notice, or without prior notice by mutual consent or for cause. Otherwise this agreement terminates upon termination of the Contract between the County and Participant's sponsoring contractor. 5. The term of this agreement commences on the date that it is executed by both the County and Participant and terminates on the date that Participant completes his/her assigned placement in the Health Services Department under the contract between the County and the Contractor identified in Paragraph 8 below. 6. Neither the County nor any agent, officer, servant, or employee of the County shall undertake or incur any liability or other responsibility respecting the quantity, quality, kind, or value of the training of Participant and no warranty, express or implied, shall exist in that regard. 7. Entire Contract. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 8. Identification of Unpaid Student Training Agreement: Number 72-195 Contractor University of South Florida County Department Health Services – Public Health Division CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PARTICIPANT (Printed Name) By (Designee) (Signature) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Unpaid Student Training Agreement #72-195 with University of South Florida for Its College of Public Health, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers to public health students, for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a non-financial agreement. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide University of South Florida public health students with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for public health is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefiting from the students’ services to patients. Under new Unpaid Student Training Agreement #72-195, University of South Florida APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.106 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Unpaid Student Training Agreement #72-195 with University of South Florida for Its College of Public Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) public health students will receive supervised fieldwork instruction and experience at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, public health students enrolled at the University of South Florida nursing program will not receive field experience and instruction at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. ATTACHMENTS USTA Agreement THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/44 Providing information about the use of Easy Smart Pay Program as an option for homeowners to pay Secured Property Taxes in monthly installments. Whereas, California Revenue and Taxation Code 2700-2708 authorize counties to collect property taxes in two installments; and Whereas, many property owners have the option to pay their property taxes in monthly installments through escrow accounts with banks owning mortgages on their properties; however, property owners who own their property outright, or do not have escrow accounts, do not have the option to pay their property taxes to the County in monthly installments. For some, the biannual tax bill creates financial hardship or considerable inconvenience; and Whereas, under current law, the Contra Costa County Treasurer-Tax Collector lacks the authority and capability to bill property owners in monthly installments; however, the corporation Smart Easy Pay, Inc. provides the Easy Smart Pay service to taxpayers on a voluntary basis; and Whereas, Easy Smart Pay, Inc is a program overseen by the California State Association of Counties Financing Corporation, offers the “Easy Smart Pay” program to taxpayers on a voluntary basis for a fee comparable to the processing fee that the Tax Collector currently charges for credit card payments; and Whereas, because this service fulfills an expressed constituent need, the Treasurer-Tax Collector seeks Board of Supervisors' authorization to provide taxpayers information on the Easy Smart Pay; and Whereas, such information would be on the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s website, emails or informational flyers at no cost to the County; and Whereas, such information to the taxpayers would not result in a financial benefit to the County but would satisfy an expressed constituent need; and The Board of Supervisor of Contra Costa County hereby approves the Treasurer-Tax Collector to provide information of Easy Smart Pay service to allow taxpayers the option of paying property tax bills monthly. Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 608-9506 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/44 to approve and authorize the Treasurer-Tax Collector, or designee, to provide information about the Easy Smart Pay Program as an option for homeowners to pay Secured Property Taxes in monthly installments. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the County and will not result in an increase in net county cost. BACKGROUND: California Revenue and Taxation Code 2700-2708 authorizes counties to collect property taxes in two installments per year. Many property owners have the option to pay their taxes in monthly installments through escrow services provided by banks owning mortgages. Property owners who own their property outright, or do not have escrow accounts, do not have the option to pay property taxes to the County in monthly installments. For some, biannual bills instead of monthly tax bills can be a financial hardship or considerable inconvenience. Many taxpayers have expressed a desire for a monthly installment option for property tax payments; however, the Treasurer-Tax Collector lacks the authority and the capability to provide monthly billing under current law. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 608-9506 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.107 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT RESOLUTION FOR EASY SMART PAY OPTION TO PAY SECURED PROPERTY TAXES IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Easy Smart Pay is a product and service of Smart Easy Pay, Inc., a privately held corporation founded in partnership with the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Financing Corporation with the aim of filling service gaps between government agencies and the public regarding property taxes. The Easy Smart Pay service allows individual property owners to voluntarily assign (and also voluntarily un-assign) their property tax bill amount spread over equal monthly installments for a transaction fee of 1.99%. Any fees in excess of property taxes due are collected by Easy Smart Pay and not by the County. For Taxpayers, the process is: Taxpayers voluntarily enroll with Easy Smart Pay1. Taxpayers pay monthly installments to Easy Smart Pay2. When taxes are due, Easy Smart Pay will remit the total property taxes due on behalf of enrolled property owners to the County, in the same manner used by other banks and financial institutions that interact with the County’s property tax system 3. The Easy Smart Pay service is available to taxpayers throughout the State within counties that have approved the program. Because the service fulfills an expressed constituent need, we seek Board of Supervisors' authorization to provide information of East Smart Pay service to County property owners where appropriate. This may involve, but not to be limited to, a link on the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s website, emails and having informational flyers in the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, taxpayers that are having financial difficulty may not pay on time which results in fees and late penalties. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/44 RECOMMENDATION(S): RESCIND Board action of September 20, 2022 (C.45), which authorized the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to purchase $2,000 in gift cards; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to purchase 150 Starbucks gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $1,500; 25 Jamba Juice gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $250; and 25 Panera gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $250; for a total purchase amount not to exceed $2,000, to distribute to community members who participate in completing a population intercept survey from September 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will not impact the originally approved $2,000 expenditure, which will be entirely funded by California Department of Public Health, Local Lead Agencies (CDPH, LLA) Grant proceeds for the Tobacco Prevention Program. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Services' Tobacco Prevention Program received funds to provide incentives to community members that participate in surveys, public comment and additional Tobacco Prevention Coalition activities. These surveys ask community members about their opinions on different tobacco related policies and the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mayra Lopez, (925) 313-6820 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.108 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Rescind Prior Board Action for Gift Cards for the Tobacco Prevention Program BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) data will be shared with community members and policymakers to support educational campaigns. Funds to support this purchase are included as a line item in a grant from the California Tobacco Control Program. On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.45 to authorize the purchase of 150 Starbucks gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $1,500; 25 Jamba Juice gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $250; and 25 Baskin Robin gift cards each with a $10 value, totaling $250; for a total value of gift cards not to exceed the amount of $2,000, as recommended by the Health Services Director. Approval of this action will change the type of gift cards purchased to be distribute to community members who participate in completing a population intercept survey through March 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the grant funding would go unspent, and the funds would return to the funder. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Department, up to 125 Amazon gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $3,125; 63 Walmart gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $1,575; and 62 Target gift cards each with a $25 value totaling $1,550; for a total amount not to exceed $6,250 to provide support for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) Medi-Cal members to participate on the CCHP Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and in focus groups, interviews, surveys, and listening sessions as required by CCHP’s contract with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) for the period February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: This $6,250 expenditure will be entirely funded by the California Department of Health Care Services funding. There is no impact to the County General Fund. BACKGROUND: Beginning with the 2024 contract, DHCS will require all Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans to have a Community Advisory Committee. The CAC’s function is to gather and incorporate member feedback on CCHP’s policies and decision-making. Members of the CAC must reflect the plan’s demographics. Since 97% of CCHP’s members are Medi-Cal recipients, CCHP will provide gift cards to help with CAC membership expenses. The gift cards will be given to eligible CAC members after they attend each meeting. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Choi, 925-313-6897 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.109 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Gift cards for Contra Costa Health Plan Community Advisory Committee Members BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) As part of CCHP’s operational readiness activities for the 2024 contract, CCHP is currently forming its CAC and will provide gift cards to eligible CAC members for meeting attendance, participating in focus groups, interviews, surveys, and listening sessions as applicable. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If these purchases are not approved, CCHP will not be able to effectively recruit and retain CAC members in order to fulfill its contractual obligation to DHCS to form a CAC and ensure that CAC members can effectively participate in CAC meetings. This will put CCHP at risk of audit findings by DHCS. ATTACHMENTS TO BOARD ORDER FEBRUARY 7, 2023 Department Description/Unit/Make/Model Serial No. Condition A. Obsolete B. Worn Out C. Beyond economical repair D. Damaged beyond repair ANIMAL SERVICES 2007 WELLS CARGO TRAILER # 8510 (MILES) 1WC200L2374067374 B. WORN OUT ANIMAL SERVICES 2007 WELLS CARGO TRAILER # 8530 (MILES) 1WC200L2574067375 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2020 CHEVY TAHOE PATROL UNIT # 3848 (898 MILES) 1GNLCDKC6LR180675 D. DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR SHERIFF 2006 KAWASAKI KLR-650 # 9129 (49977 MILES) JKAKLEA126DA23329 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2017 FORD INTERCEPTOR SEDAN # 2581 (94031 MILES) 1FAHP2MT2HG135293 B. WORN OUT HEALTH SERVICES 2010 FORD RANGER TRUCK # 5078 (56986 MILES) 1FTKR1EE2APA17352 B. WORN OUT HEALTH SERVICES 2011 FORD RANGER TRUCK # 5081 (96911 MILES) 1FTKR1EE1BPA14234 B. WORN OUT CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 2013 FORD ESCAPE SUV # 3729 (121213 MILES 1FMCU0G9XDUC37403 B. WORN OUT RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Section 1108-2.212 of the County Ordinance Code authorizes the Purchasing Agent to dispose of any personal property belonging to Contra Costa County and found by the Board of Supervisors not to be required for public use. The property for disposal is either obsolete, worn out, beyond economical repair, or damaged beyond repair. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Public Works would not be able to dispose of surplus vehicles and equipment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Nida Rivera, (925) 313-2124 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.110 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Disposal of Surplus Property ATTACHMENTS Surplus Vehicles and Equipment Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC January 3, 2023 CREDENTIALING PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Name Specialty Addiego-Hutton, Megan, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Allen, Caroline, LCSW Mental Health Services Ani, Michael, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Beer, Robert, MD Dermatology Bryden, Sharon, NP Mid Level Wound Care Bueno, Samantha, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Charles, Wilbert, MD Community Health Worker Chung, John, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Clavo, Jacqueline, CRNA Mid-Level Anesthesiology Cruz, Paige Alexandria, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Dillon, Timothy, NP Mid-Level Family Medicine Duda, Shayla, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Garcia Garcia, Anaiby, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Guo, Yanhong, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Hegr, Arielle, MA Qualified Autism Provider Jensen, Lisa, CNM Midwife Lovette, Hilda, AMFT Qualified Autism Provider Maraach, Dana, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Palakurthy, Prasad, MD Cardiovascular Disease Rodas, Hellen, ACSW Mental Health Services Sharif-Hassanabadi, Maryam, MD Nephrology Suarez, Daniela, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Tchorbadjiyska, Anastassia, PA Mid Level Orthopaedic Surgery Assistant Thomas, Arielle, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Tran, Lucy Thi, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Wang, Yi, LAC Acupuncture CREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Amore Home Health Home Health Fremont OPO Health Home Health San Mateo Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC January 3 and 24, 2023 Page 2 of 3 RECREDENTIALING PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Name Specialty Aqeel, Noorulain, MD Psychiatry/Geriatric Psychiatry Bauman, Loren, PA Mid-Level Urgent Care Bhela, Serena, MD Nephrology Blair, Sloane, NP Primary Care Pediatrician Burkhard, Brianna, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Chowwoods, Diane, DPM Podiatry Diaz Flores, Rafael, MD Surgery – General/ Surgical Critical Care Dixit, Rashmi, MD Rheumatology Fuller, Eric, DPM Podiatry Gharagozlou, Parham, MD Internal Medicine/Sleep Medicine Gluckstein, Lawrence, MD Anesthesiology Heller, Bruce, MD Family Planning Holman, Herbert, MD Dermatology Iqbal, Javed, MD Psychiatry Jahangiri, Hameed, MD Psychiatry Khan, Junaid, MD Surgery – Cardiothoracic Kim, Edward T., MD Nephrology Kim, Kenneth, MD Pain Medicine Klara, Erika, MFT Mental Health Services Knadle, Julie, PT Physical Therapy Kwan, Diane, MD Surgery – Bariatric Leeman, Damara, RD Dietitian/Diabetes Educator Maganti, Kalyani, MD Gastroenterology Marine, Mary, MA Lactation Consultant McEntee, Rebecca, MD Primary Care Family Medicine Nguyen, Connie, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Oja, Kimberly, NP Mid-Level Urology Padula, Anthony, MD Rheumatology Stanten, Russell, MD Surgery – Cardiothoracic Sun, Xingbo, DPM Podiatry Traynor, Jeffrey, MD Perinatology Tsujimoto, Bryan, NP Mid-Level Family Medicine Verret, Jasmine, NP Mid-Level Family Planning Won, Rosa, MD Perinatology Wong, David J., MD Dermatology Wu, David W., MD Rheumatology Wycoff-Montenegro, Melissa, MD Psychiatry Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC and Medical Director January 3 and 24, 2023 Page 3 of 3 RECREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location 1125 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Operating Company, LLC dba: Kentfield Hospital San Francisco Long-Term Acute Care Hospital San Francisco DaVita - San Ramon Valley Home Training Dialysis Danville San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center Skilled Nursing Facility San Pablo Providers Approved by Medical Director January 24, 2023 CREDENTIALING PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Name Specialty Conderman, Christian, MD Otolaryngology Griffiths, Sean, DO Surgery - Orthopaedic Kelley, Kanwar, MD Otolaryngology Orlino, Jon Christopher, MD Surgery - Vascular RECREDENTIALING PROVIDERS JANUARY 2023 Name Specialty Radosevich, Jeana, MD Primary Care Family Medicine Ting, T. Daniel, MD Ophthalmology bopl-January 3 and 24, 2023 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing Committee and the Health Services Director on January 3 and 24, 2023, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) requires that evidence of Board of Supervisor approval must be contained within each Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) provider’s credentials file. Approval of this list of providers as recommended by the CCHP Medical Director will enable the Contra Costa Health Plan to comply with this requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, Contra Costa Health Plan’s Providers would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with the NCQA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.111 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve New and Recredentialing Providers in Contra Costa Health Plan’s Community Provider Network ATTACHMENTS 1/3/23 and 1/24/23 - Provider Lists - 1 - Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council The Bay Point Municipal Advisory Committee serves as an advisory body to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the County Planning Agency. 2022 Annual Board Report – Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council We began 2022 by electing our Officers. All meetings were conducted via ZOOM this year. At every MAC meeting we have regular updates from; • California Highway Patrol • Contra Costa Sheriff’s • Code Enforcement • Conta Costa Fire Protection District • Golden State Water • Supervisor Glover Supervisor Glover made sure the MAC had regular updates on COVID and county health data and protocols. Reports: • Urban Greening Infrastructure opportunities in Bay Point • Update on PG&E pond project • We welcomed LTC Kyle Brown from MOTCO to our community and received an update on the new Access Point coming on Port Chicago Highway • We had a report from Animal Services • Informational Report from Tracy Craig regarding upcoming work at the former Pittsburg Power Plant Proposals: • Accepted a report from the County Administrator on the status of the dissolution of the Los Medanos Community Healthcare District and appoint to individual to serve on the future Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee Debra Mason, 2022 Chair Federal Glover, District Supervisor, District V - 2 - • Request to approval of a rezone of a project site from Heavy Industrial to a Planned Unit District • Conceptual Plan for the corner of Clearland Circle and Willow Pass Rd. The MAC appointed Marcia Lessley and Lee Mason to serve on the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee Attendance at MAC meetings: We were pleased to have members of the community attend almost all of our zoom meetings. Attendance of MAC members; two members has perfect attendance, three members missed 2 meetings, two members missed three missed more than 2 meetings. Respectively submitted by 2022 Chair: Debra Mason RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE 2022 Annual Report submitted by the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2002, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2002/377, which requires that each regular and ongoing board, commission, or committee shall annually report to the Board of Supervisors on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required truing/certification (if any), and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. The attached report fulfills this requirement for the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Vincent Manuel (925) 608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.112 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:2022 Annual Report From Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council ATTACHMENTS Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council - 2022 Annual Report Contra Costa County UNPAID STUDENT TRAINING AGREEMENT Number 22-472-4 1. Contract Identification. Department: Health Services- Public Health Division Subject: Unpaid student training agreement with Department, sponsored by Contractor 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX Capacity: Educational Institution Address: 4025 South Riverpoint Parkway, Phoenix, Arizona 85040 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is March 1, 2023 , and it terminates June 30, 2026 , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, at its sole discretion, upon seven-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or canceled immediately by written mutual consent, subject to termination conditions (if any) set forth in the Program Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5. Program. By this Agreement, County agrees to permit unpaid student training of persons (“Participants”) sponsored by Contractor under the following conditions: a. Services provided under this Agreement are volunteer services, and Participants obtain no employment rights with, or employment benefits from, the County, by virtue of this Agreement or service hereunder. Each Participant agrees to the foregoing and must execute the Unpaid Student Training Participation Agreement form attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. b. Contract terms and conditions are expressed in the Program Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 6. Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 7. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless County and its officers and employees from any and all claims, costs and liability for any damages, sickness, death or injury to person or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from or connected with the operation or services provided hereunder by Contractor, its agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, students, or the Participants as described herein, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of County or its officers or employees. 8. Legal Authority. This Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authority: California Government Code § 26227. 9. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties’ agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By By Designee Recommended by Department (Designate official capacity) By Designee (Form approved by County Counsel) DocuSign Envelope ID: 750F99F3-1BB6-49EE-B301-813B2839DB0C PROGRAM PLAN Number 22-472-4 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -1- 1. Purpose of the Program. University of Phoenix, (hereinafter referred to as “Contractor”) conducts a nursing training program for its nursing students, in cooperation with County’s Department. The Contractor desires to have its nursing students enrolled in this program to receive clinical field experience and instruction from the County, and the County is willing to provide such clinical experience and instruction under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Therefore, the parties will undertake a program whereby such instruction and experience will be provided in accordance with this Agreement (Program), mutually agreed to by the parties. 2. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall: a. Designate nursing students for participation in the Program conducted pursuant to this Agreement (Participants); b. Suggest dates for the clinical field experience, and cooperate with County’s Department in establishing assignment schedules consisting of specific dates for the placement of a specific number of Participants with the County for training; c. Assign for clinical field experience, only those Participants who are considered adequate by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto; d. Make all necessary arrangements so that each Participant will: (1) Have completed all the necessary courses required by the Contractor as preparation for said clinical field experience; (2) Execute the County’s Unpaid Student Training Participant Agreement (attached as Exhibit A) upon referral to the training Program; (3) Arrange for their own transportation to and from the Health Services Department, and for maintenance and housing during field instruction; (4) Channel educational problems to the appropriate instructor(s) in Contractor’s school; (5) Promptly report any illnesses and absences from duty; and (6) Comply with regulations and standards of conduct governing professional personnel in the County Health Services Department. e. Agree to have each Participant furnish to County, upon request, such evidence as Contractor may require showing that the Participant assigned for training is physically, psychologically and/or medically fit. If Contractor needs to provide any confidential medical information regarding Participant, County will have Participant sign a release for such information and forward the release to Contractor; and f. Provide County with evidence that the Contractor has in full force and effect, during the term of this Agreement, general liability insurance for Participants designated for participation pursuant to this Agreement with coverage of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for the activities of the Participants pursuant to this Agreement. DocuSign Envelope ID: 750F99F3-1BB6-49EE-B301-813B2839DB0C PROGRAM PLAN Number 22-472-4 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -2- g. Contractor will retain ultimate responsibility for the education of its students. The Contractor’s representative for this Agreement will be a faculty member appointed and assigned by the Contractor, as liaison to the County. 3. County’s Obligations. County shall: a. Comply with all State statutes and regulations applicable to the training of Participants enrolled in the Program; b. Accept for clinical field experience those Participants assigned by the Contractor for such a period and in such numbers as may be mutually agreed in writing; c. Provide the Participants with learning experiences needed to meet the objectives of the training Program, which will be mutually agreed to by the parties in accordance with this Agreement; d. Have the right to terminate the participation of any Participant in the clinical field experience for failure to follow the instructions of County, or for any other lawful reason. In the event of such termination, County shall give prompt written notice to the Contractor; and e. Comply with applicable state and federal workplace safety laws and regulations. In the event a Participant is exposed to an infectious or environmental hazard or other occupational injury (i.e. needle stick) while at the County, the County, upon notice of such incident from the student, will provide such emergency care as is provided to its employees or students, where applicable. 4. Joint Obligations. County and Contractor shall jointly: a. Plan the student-training Program, including course content and Participant assignment schedule, so as to provide a sound and effective educational Program; b. Review the Program at the end of each training period in order to evaluate progress and recommend changes for the next consecutive training period; and c. Plan for periodic review of this Agreement. 5. Participants’ Obligations. Contractor shall ensure that its Participants: a. Execute the County’s Unpaid Student Training Participant Agreement (attached as Exhibit A hereto) upon referral to the training Program; b. Abide by County policies and regulations; c. Conduct themselves in an appropriate professional manner consistent with responsibility; d. Observe and respect patient’s rights, privacy, and dignity; and e. Comply with applicable County, State, and Federal regulations respecting disclosure of patients’ health information and access to, and removal of, medical records and/or information contained therein. DocuSign Envelope ID: 750F99F3-1BB6-49EE-B301-813B2839DB0C PROGRAM PLAN Number 22-472-4 Initials:__________ ____________ Contractor County Dept. -3- 6. Contractor, County and Participant Agreement. Participants are not entitled to reimbursement by County for expenses associated with the use of personal vehicles while engaged in the training Program covered by this Agreement. Participants are not entitled to any compensation from County during their participation in Contractor’s training Program. Participants may receive course credit from Contractor for their participation in the training Program covered by this Agreement. DocuSign Envelope ID: 750F99F3-1BB6-49EE-B301-813B2839DB0C EXHIBIT A Contra Costa County UNPAID STUDENT TRAINING PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT The County of Contra Costa (“County”) and the Participant named below agree as follows: 1. Participant will engage in training for a County department pursuant to a contract between the County and a contractor sponsoring the Participant, hereinafter the “Training Program.” 2. Participant agrees that in connection with Training Program, Participant is a volunteer, and will obtain no employment rights or employment benefits from the County and waives any claim to any employment rights or employment benefits from the County based upon Participant's training services, whether or not authorized under such contract. Participant is not entitled to any monetary compensation or expense reimbursement from County for participation in Training Program; Participant acknowledges that his/her participation in the Training Program is for his/her personal benefit and solely for educational purposes, and that he/she may receive course credit from the educational institution at which he/she is enrolled. 3. Participant further agrees that he/she has read and understands the Unpaid Student Training Agreement (identified in paragraph 8, below) between the County and Participant's sponsoring contractor. 4. County or Participant may terminate this agreement upon three day's notice, or without prior notice by mutual consent or for cause. Otherwise this agreement terminates upon termination of the Contract between the County and Participant's sponsoring contractor. 5. The term of this agreement commences on the date that it is executed by both the County and Participant and terminates on the date that Participant completes his/her assigned placement in the Health Services Department under the contract between the County and the Contractor identified in Paragraph 8 below. 6. Neither the County nor any agent, officer, servant, or employee of the County shall undertake or incur any liability or other responsibility respecting the quantity, quality, kind, or value of the training of Participant and no warranty, express or implied, shall exist in that regard. 7. Entire Contract. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 8. Identification of Unpaid Student Training Agreement: Number 22-472-4 Contractor University of Phoenix County Department Health Services – Public Health Division CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PARTICIPANT (Printed Name) By (Designee) (Signature) DocuSign Envelope ID: 750F99F3-1BB6-49EE-B301-813B2839DB0C RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-472-4 with the University of Phoenix, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction to nursing students in the County’s Public Health Division for the period from March 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a non-financial agreement. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide nursing students at University of Phoenix with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefiting from the students’ services to patients. Under Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-472-4, University of Phoenix nursing students will receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience with Health Services Department for the period March 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.113 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-472-4 with University of Phoenix CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience in the County’s Public Health Division. ATTACHMENTS USTA Agreement THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 04/26/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/146 IN THE MATTER OF CALLING AND NOTICING AN ELECTION OF RETIREMENT BOARD ALTERNATE SEVENTH MEMBER (Government Code section 31523) WHEREAS, the office of the Member No. 7 Alternate of the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association Retirement Board became vacant on April 1, 2022. The County Employees’ Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code section 31523 prescribes that an election be held at the earliest possible date to fill the vacancy; and WHEREAS, the safety members of the retirement system would elect a safety member from the fire suppression group to fill this office for the three-year term ending June 30, 2023, since the seventh member seat is currently held by a safety member from the sheriff’s group. (Government Code Sections 31523(a) and 31470.2.); and WHEREAS, the term of office of Member No. 7 Alternate of the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association Board will be completed as of June 30, 2023; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: Nominations shall be on forms provided by the County Clerk starting on May 16, 2022 and filed in that office not later than 5 p.m. on June 10, 2022. The Clerk shall have ballots printed with the nominees’ names and with blank spaces for write-in candidates. The Clerk shall have a ballot mailed no later than August 8, 2022 to each member of the appropriate group of the Retirement Association as of June 1, 2022 with a ballot envelope in which to enclose the ballot when voted, imprinted “Retirement Board Ballot” or similar words, together with a “return postage guaranteed” envelope addressed to the County Clerk for mailing the ballot envelope to that office, and with instructions that the ballot shall be marked and returned to the County Clerk before 5 p.m. on election day. (See No. 2 below.) 1. Election Day is hereby fixed as September 6, 2022. Any Ballot reaching the County Clerk’s Office after 5 p.m. on September 6, 2022 shall be voided and not counted. 2. Notice of election and nomination procedure shall be given by the Clerk by publishing a copy of this resolution at least once in the Contra Costa Times, West Contra Costa Times, San Ramon Valley Times, and the Ledger Post Dispatch at least ten days before the last day for receiving nominations. (See No. 1 above.) 3. On September 7, 2022, the County Clerk shall cause all valid ballots to be publicly opened, counted, and tallied by an Election Board, which shall forthwith certify the return to this Board; and this Board shall declare the winners elected, or arrange for a run-off election in case of a tie. 4. If the County Clerk receives no valid nominations for any position, he shall so inform this Board which shall call a new election therefore; and if the Clerk receives only one nomination for any position, he shall so notify this Board which shall direct the Clerk to cast a unanimous ballot in favor of the nominated member as prescribed in Government Code section 31523(c). 5. Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea 925.655.2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: April 26, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Retirement Administrator, CAO (Enea) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/07/2023 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Ken Carlson Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2023/45 IN THE MATTER OF CALLING AND NOTICING AN ELECTION OF RETIREMENT BOARD MEMBERS NO. 3 (GENERAL), 7 (SAFETY), AND 7 ALTERNATE (SAFETY) (Government Code sections 31520.0 and 31523) WHEREAS, the terms of office of members 3, 7, and 7 alternate of the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board will be completed as of June 30, 2023. The members are: Member No.Name Seat 3 Dennis Chebotarev General Member 7 Donald Finley Safety Member 7 Alternate Samson Wong Safety Alternate WHEREAS, the County Employees’ Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code section 31523 prescribes that an election be held at the earliest possible date to fill the vacancy; and WHEREAS, the appropriate members of the Retirement Association may elect someone to fill these offices for a three-year term beginning July 1, 2023 as provided below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: Nominations shall be on forms provided by the County Clerk starting on Monday, February 20, 2023 and filed in that office not later than 5 p.m. on March 17, 2023. The Clerk shall have ballots printed with the nominees' names and with blank spaces for write-in candidates. The Clerk shall have a ballot mailed no later than May 15, 2023 to each member of the appropriate group of the Retirement Association as of April 1, 2023 with a ballot envelope in which to enclose the ballot when voted, imprinted "Retirement Board Ballot" or similar words, together with a postage paid, Business reply envelope addressed to the County Clerk for mailing the ballot envelope to that office, and with instructions that the ballot shall be marked and returned to the County Clerk before 5 p.m. on election day. (See No. 2 below.) 1. Election Day is hereby fixed as Tuesday, June 13, 2023. Any Ballot reaching the County Clerk's Office after 5 p.m. on Tuesday, June 13, 2023 shall be voided and not counted. 2. Notice of election and nomination procedure shall be given by the Clerk by publishing a copy of this resolution at least once in the Contra Costa Times, West Contra Costa Times, San Ramon Valley Times, and the Ledger Post Dispatch at least ten days before the last day for receiving nominations. (See No 1 above.) 3. On Wednesday, June 14, 2023, the County Clerk shall cause all valid ballots to be publicly opened, counted, and tallied by an Election Board, which shall forthwith certify the return to this Board; and this Board shall declare the winners elected, or arrange for a run-off election in case of a tie. 4. If the County Clerk receives no valid nominations for the position, he shall so inform this Board which shall call a new election therefore; and if the Clerk receives only one nomination for any of these positions, he shall so notify this Board which shall declare that person elected to that position in accordance with Government Code Section 31523(c). 5. Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea 925.655.2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: CAO (Enea), Retirement Board (Dunn), County Clerk - Elections Division RECOMMENDATION(S): ACKNOWLEDGE that offices of the Members 3, 7, and 7 Alternate seats on the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association (CCCERA) Board of Trustees (Retirement Board) will become vacant on July 1, 2023. 1. ACKNOWLEDGE that the general members of the retirement system would elect a general member for the No. 3 seat, and safety members would elect safety members from two different safety groups to fill the No. 7 and No. 7 Alternate seats. All seats will be filled for the new three-year term beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2026. 2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2023/45 calling and noticing election of CCCERA Board of Trustees Members, 3 (general member), 7 (safety member), and 7 Alternate (safety member) as recommended by the CCCERA Chief Executive Officer. 3. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The terms of the Member Nos. 3 (General), 7 (Safety) and 7 Alternate (Safety) on the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association Board will expire on June 30, 2023. The general members of the Association may elect the No. 3 member, as provided in the attached Resolution. The election would be to fill the seat for the new three-year term of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026. The safety members of the Association may elect the No. 7 and No. 7 Alternate members as provided in the attached Resolution. The election would be to fill the seats for the new three-year term of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea 925.655.2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: CAO (Enea), Retirement Board (Dunn), County Clerk - Elections Division C.114 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:ELECTION OF RETIREMENT BOARD MEMBERS NO. 3 (GENERAL), 7 (SAFETY) AND 7 ALTERNATE (SAFETY) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Government Code section 31523(a) specifies: "(a) With respect to a vacancy in the seventh member position, candidates shall be a safety member from a group which is not represented by an incumbent alternate seventh member.  With respect to the alternate seventh member position, the candidates shall be limited to the group under Section 31470.2 or 31470.4 (generally, safety members), or any other eligible safety member in a county if there is no eligible candidate from the groups under Sections 31470.2 and 31470.4 that is not represented by an incumbent seventh board member.  The successful candidate shall serve for the duration of the current term. Government Code Section 31520.1 (b) and (c) specifies: "(b) The alternate seventh member provided for by this section shall vote as a member of the board only if the second, third, seventh, or eighth member is absent from a board meeting for any cause, or if there is a vacancy with respect to the second, third, seventh, or eighth member, the alternate seventh member shall fill the vacancy until a successor qualifies.  The alternate seventh member shall sit on the board in place of the seventh member if a member of the same service is before the board for determination of his or her retirement. (c) The alternate seventh member shall be entitled to both of the following: (1) The alternate seventh member shall have the same rights, privileges, responsibilities, and access to closed sessions as the second, third, seventh, and eighth member. (2) The alternate seventh member may hold positions on committees of the board independent of the second, third, seventh, or eighth member and may participate in the deliberations of the board or any of its committees to which the alternate seventh member has been appointed whether or not the second, third, seventh, or eighth member is present." Election Day is hereby fixed as Tuesday, June 13, 2023. Any Ballot reaching the County Clerk's Office after 5 p.m. on Tuesday, June 13, 2023 shall be voided and not counted. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2023/45 Resolution 2022/146 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2023/45 Governor Newsom to End the COVID-19 State of Emergency Published: Oct 17, 2022 Californiaʼs pandemic response saved tens of thousands of lives, protected the economy, distributed nation-leading financial assistance and built up an unprecedented public health infrastructure The SMARTER Plan will maintain Californiaʼs operational preparedness to support communities and quickly respond to outbreaks SACRAMENTO – Today, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the COVID-19 State of Emergency will end on February 28, 2023, charting the path to phasing out one of the most eective and necessar y tools that California has used to combat COVID-19. This timeline gives the health care system needed flexibility to handle any potential surge that may occur aer the holidays in January and Februar y, in addition to providing state and local partners the time needed to prepare for this phaseout and set themselves up for success aerwards. With hospitalizations and deaths dramatically reduced due to the stateʼs vaccination and public health eorts, California has the tools needed to continue fighting COVID-19 when the State of Emergency terminates at the end of Februar y, including vaccines and boosters, testing, treatments and other mitigation measures like masking and indoor ventilation. As the State of Emergency is phased out, the SMARTER Plan continues to guide Californiaʼs strategy to best protect people from COVID-19. SMARTER Plan progress update “Throughout the pandemic, weʼve been guided by the science and data – moving quickly and strategically to save lives. The State of Emergency was an eective and necessary tool that we utilized to protect our state, and we wouldnʼt have gotten to this point without it,” said Governor Newsom. “With the operational preparedness that weʼve built up and the measures that weʼll continue to employ moving for ward, California is ready to phase out this tool.” To maintain Californiaʼs COVID-19 laboratory testing and therapeutics treatment capacity, the Newsom Administration will be seeking two statutor y changes immediately upon the Legislatureʼs return: 1) The continued ability of nurses to dispense COVID-19 therapeutics; and 2) The continued ability of laboratory workers to solely process COVID-19 tests. “Californiaʼs response to the COVID-19 pandemic has prepared us for whatever comes next. A s we move into this next phase, the infrastructure and processes weʼve invested in and built up will provide us the tools to manage any ups and downs in the future,” said Secretar y of the California Health & Human Services Agency, Dr. Mark Ghaly. “While the threat of this virus is still real, our preparedness and collective work have helped turn this once crisis emergency into a manageable situation.” Throughout the pandemic, Governor Newsom, the Legislature and state agencies have been guided by the science and data to best protect Californians and save lives – with a focus on those facing the greatest social and health inequities – remaining nimble to adapt mitigation eorts along the way as we learned more about COVID-19. The stateʼs eorts to support Californians resulted in: Administration of 81 million vaccinations, distribution of a billion units of PPE throughout the state and processing of 186 million tests. Allocation of billions of dollars to support hospitals, community organizations, frontline workers, schools and more throughout the pandemic. The nationʼs largest stimulus programs to support people hardest hit by the pandemic – $18.5 billion for direct payments to Californians, $8 billion for rent relief, $10 billion for small business grants and tax relief, $2.8 billion to help with overdue utility bills, and more. Californiaʼs pandemic response eorts have saved tens of thousands of lives, kept people out of the hospital and protected the economy: Californiaʼs death rate is the lowest amongst large states. If California had Texasʼ death rate, 27,000 more people would have died here. If California had Floridaʼs rate, that figure jumps to approximately 56,000 more deaths. In only the first ten months of vaccines being available, a study showed that Californiaʼs eorts saved 20,000 lives, kept 73,000 people out of the hospital and prevented 1.5 million infections. Californiaʼs actions during the pandemic protected the economy and the state continues to lead the nation in creating jobs and new business starts: “ʻLockdownʼ states like California did better economically than ʻlooserʼ states like Florida, new COVID data shows,” with Californiaʼs economy having contracted less than such states – economic output shrank 3.5% on average for the U.S., compared with 2.8% for California. Since Februar y 2021, California has created 1,628,300 new jobs – over 16% of the nationʼs jobs, by far more than any other state. By comparison, Texas created 1,133,200 jobs (11.3% of the nationʼs) and Florida created 787,600 jobs (7.9% of the nationʼs) in that same timeframe. Since the beginning of 2019, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that over 569,000 businesses started in California, by far more than any other state. ### RECOMMENDATION(S): TERMINATE, effective February 28, 2023, the local emergency throughout Contra Costa County proclaimed by the Board of Supervisors on March 10, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, consistent with the end of the statewide state of emergency. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. The local emergency was declared to recognize the impact of COVID-19 on Contra Costa County, provide flexibility to the County in its response efforts and to maintain eligibility for the County, and its cities, to pursue disaster relief funds to help cover costs related to the emergency response. In October 2022, Governor Newsom announced that the State's COVID-19 state of emergency would be terminated as of February 28, 2023. This action would ensure that Contra Costa County continues to maintain alignment with the State of California on its COVID-19 emergency response posture. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/07/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy M. Ewell, (925) 655-2043 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 7, 2023 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C.115 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:February 7, 2023 Contra Costa County Subject:TERMINATION OF LOCAL COVID-19 EMERGENCY DECLARATION BACKGROUND: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020, the Board of Supervisors declared a countywide emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently requested that Governor Newsom include the County in the State's emergency declaration. (D. 3) Later that week, on Friday, March 13, 2020, President Trump declared a nationwide emergency in response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic pursuant to Sec. 501(b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the “Stafford Act”). That action provided access to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Public Assistance program, which allows for a 75% federal cost share on certain emergency protective measures taken at the direction or guidance of public health officials in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, the 75% federal cost share was increased to 100% for eligible costs through June 30, 2022.Qualifying expenditures are those that are not supported by the authorities of another federal agency (i.e. reimbursement for response activities funded by another federal agency grant program). Examples of reimbursable activities include the activation of Emergency Operations Centers, National Guard costs, law enforcement and other measures necessary to protect public health and safety. The Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) facilitated the collection of FEMA Requests for Public Assistance (RPA) from agencies (public and private) impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. CalOES advised that RPA documents, which do not include a specific dollar amount of public assistance being requested, be filed no later than April 17, 2020. Filing of this document allows agencies, including the County, to be on record stating that costs have been incurred as part of the response effort and allows for a request to FEMA that a portion of those costs be reimbursed in the future. In addition, CalOES requested that impacted agencies adopt required Project Assurances for federal Assistance and a resolution designating agents that can act on behalf of the impacted agency. On March 31, 2020, the Board of Supervisors took action to adopt Resolution No. 2020/112 authorizing the County Administrator to submit the RPA documents discussed above to CalOES to ensure the opportunity for Federal cost reimbursement. The County subsequently filed its RPA with FEMA, which was approved on April 17, 2020 and serves as the basis for the County's FEMA reimbursement eligibility. State Disaster Request and Presidential Authorization Following the President's action, Governor Newsom requested that the federal government declare a major disaster in California due to COVID-19. The President approved the State's request on Sunday, March 22, 2020, which activated additional federal resources directed to assist California, including deployment of mobile hospital units and a U.S. Navy hospital ship, among other things. Contra Costa County was a recipient of federal and state resources over the course of the pandemic, including mobile field hospital equipment, and took delivery of those resources at the Craneway Pavilion in Richmond, which served as a 250-bed alternate care site supporting the capacity of the County's hospital and clinic system. In addition, the state has provided for several COVID-19 testing centers strategically placed throughout the County. County Reopening and Restoration of Procurement Policies On June 14, 2021, the County Administrator released reopening guidance for County departments following the Governor's termination of the “Stay At Home” order and retiring of the "Blueprint for a Safer Economy" both effective on June 15, 2021. This was to maintain continued County alignment with the State's COVID-19 response efforts. Specifically, department heads were provided guidance on face covering/workplace safety policies, emergency procurement procedures and restoration of employee travel. Most notably at the time, departments were directed to reopen lobbies of County facilities to the public. In addition, the County Administrator authorized a two-phase restoration of pre-COVID procurement policies and procedures in recognition of ramp up time required to transition from an emergency procurement posture back to normal operations. Ultimately, full restoration of pre-COVID purchasing policies and procedures were effective October 31, 2021. Announcement of Governor's Termination of COVID-19 Emergency Declaration On October 17, 2022, Governor Newsom announced that California's COVID-19 state of emergency would end on February 28, 2023. In a press release announcing the termination, the Governor's office stated that the lead time..."give(s) the health care system needed flexibility to handle any potential surge that may occur after the holidays in January and February, in addition to providing state and local partners the time needed to prepare for this phaseout and set themselves up for success afterwards." The termination of the state of emergency does not mean that the State will discontinue assistance to the County on its cost recovery claims by CalOES for the period covered during the state of emergency. It is anticipated that the recovery process, as in most disasters, will continue for several years following conclusion of the state of emergency. Today's action requests that the Board of Supervisors terminate the local, County COVID-19 emergency declaration, consistent with termination with the statewide emergency declaration. The County Administrator's Office and the Health Services Department will continue to provide the Board with updates on the cost recovery and COVID-19 response transition process going forward. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County's COVID-19 emergency declaration would remain in place even after the termination of the State of California's COVID-19 emergency declaration. ATTACHMENTS Press Release: Governor Newsom to End the COVID-19 State of Emergency, October 17, 2022