HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01242023 - BOS Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE
BOARD
BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229
JOHN GIOIA, Chair 1ST DISTRICT
FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT
CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT
DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT
KEN CARLSON, 4TH DISTRICT
MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075
PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON
THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES.
A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR.
The Board meeting will be accessible in-person, via television, and via live-streaming to all
members of the public. Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27,
ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32, and can be seen live online at
www.contracosta.ca.gov.
Persons who wish to address the board during public comment or with respect to an item on the
agenda may comment in person or may call in during the meeting by dialing 888-278-0254
followed by the access code 843298#. A caller should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda
item, by pushing "#2" on their phone. Access via Zoom is also available using the following link:
https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/87344719204. Those participating via Zoom should indicate they
wish to speak on an agenda item by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. To
provide contact information, please contact Clerk of the Board at
clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us or call 925-655-2000.
Meetings of the Board are closed-captioned in real time. Public comment generally will be limited
to two minutes. Your patience is appreciated. A Spanish language interpreter is available to assist
Spanish-speaking callers.
A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair.
Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible online at
www.contracosta.ca.gov.
ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES
January 24, 2023
8:30 A.M. Breakfast and coffee.
9:00 A.M. Convene and call to order, and opening ceremonies. (Chair, John Gioia)
Present: District I Supervisor John Gioia; District II Supervisor Candace Andersen; District III
Supervisor Diane Burgis; District IV Supervisor Ken Carlson; District V Supervisor Federal D.
Glover
Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Inspirational Thought: "A goal without a plan is just a wish." ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery,
French writer, poet, journalist and pioneering aviator.
D.1 ACCEPT report "Navigating the Stimulus Hangover; Focus on Contra Costa
County" prepared by Beacon Economics. (Dr. Christopher Thornberg, Beacon
Economics)
Board voted 5-0 to accept updated slide presentation.
Public Comments: Mariana, Roxanne, Caller 6770
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace
Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.2 ACCEPT report on budget and key issues for FY23-24 and beyond. (Monica
Nino, County Administrator, Adam Nguyen, County Finance Director, and Tim
Ewell, Chief Assistant County Administrator) and RECEIVE presentation from
the Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition. (Sarah Gurdian, Program Director,
Budget Justice Coalition and Ryan Fukumori, Policy Link Senior Associate)
Public comments: John, Mariana, Roxanne, Dan, Caller 6770, Jan, Liz, Rachel, Ruth.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace
Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.3 ACCEPT report on Capital Projects. (Eric Angstadt, Chief Assistant County
Administrator)
No comments.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace
Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
12:00 P.M. Break for lunch
Closed Session Agenda
Closed Session Agenda
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6)
1. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino.
Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700;
California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.;
Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’
Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra
Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof.
& Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856.
2. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino.
Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees.
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (Gov. Code, § 54957)
Title: Veterans Services Officer
1:00 P.M. Resume Open Session
Public Comment (2 minutes)
Public comments: Caller 6770
D.4 ACCEPT report from the Health Services Department. (Anna Roth, Health
Services Director)
Public comment: Caller 6770
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace
Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.5 CONSIDER potential updates to Board Operating Procedures and
Communications and provide direction to staff. (Chair, John Gioia)
Public comments: John, Caller 6770.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace
Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Wrap-up and closing comments (Chair, John Gioia)
ADJOURN
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the
Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to
address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any
written statement to the Clerk.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and
distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less
than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar Street, First
Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours.
All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a
member of the Board before the Board votes on the motion to adopt.
Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair
calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After
persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the
Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of
Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of
Supervisors, 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to
clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us.
The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to
attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at
(925) 655-2000.
Anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda
may contact the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025
Escobar Street, Martinez, California.
Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board,
(925) 655-2000 or using the County's on line subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web
Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be viewed:
www.contracosta.ca.gov
DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS
Pursuant to Government Code section 84308, members of the Board of Supervisors are
disqualified and not able to participate in any agenda item involving contracts (other than
competitively bid, labor, or personal employment contracts), franchises, discretionary land use
permits and other entitlements if the Board member received, since January 1, 2023, more than
$250 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or
contractor, or any financially interested participant who actively supports or opposes the County’s
decision on the agenda item. Members of the Board of Supervisors who have received, and
applicants, contractors or their agents who have made, campaign contributions totaling more than
$250 to a Board member since January 1, 2023, are required to disclose that fact for the official
record of the subject proceeding. Disclosures must include the amount of the campaign
contribution and identify the recipient Board member, and may be made either in writing to the
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors before the subject hearing or by verbal disclosure at the time of
the hearing.
STANDING COMMITTEES
The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the
second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride
Drive, Concord.
The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen)
meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration
Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday
of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street,
Martinez.
The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia)
meets quarterly on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County
Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on
the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building,
1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second
Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street,
Martinez.
The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the
fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025
Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the
fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building,
1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and
Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County
Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings.
Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order):
Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and
industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is
a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials
associated with Board meetings:
AB Assembly Bill
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees
AICP American Institute of Certified Planners
AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs
ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District
BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System
BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission
BGO Better Government Ordinance
BOS Board of Supervisors
CALTRANS California Department of Transportation
CalWIN California Works Information Network
CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids
CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response
CAO County Administrative Officer or Office
CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority
CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
CCWD Contra Costa Water District
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIO Chief Information Officer
COLA Cost of living adjustment
ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CPA Certified Public Accountant
CPI Consumer Price Index
CSA County Service Area
CSAC California State Association of Counties
CTC California Transportation Commission
dba doing business as
DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program
EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District
ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health)
et al. et alii (and others)
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
F&HS Family and Human Services Committee
First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10)
FTE Full Time Equivalent
FY Fiscal Year
GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District
GIS Geographic Information System
HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development
HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HOV High Occupancy Vehicle
HR Human Resources
HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
IHSS In-Home Supportive Services
Inc. Incorporated
IOC Internal Operations Committee
ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance
JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement
Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area
LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission
LLC Limited Liability Company
LLP Limited Liability Partnership
Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1
LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse
MAC Municipal Advisory Council
MBE Minority Business Enterprise
M.D. Medical Doctor
M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist
MIS Management Information System
MOE Maintenance of Effort
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
NACo National Association of Counties
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology
O.D. Doctor of Optometry
OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center
OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services
PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act
Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology
RDA Redevelopment Agency
RFI Request For Information
RFP Request For Proposal
RFQ Request For Qualifications
RN Registered Nurse
SB Senate Bill
SBE Small Business Enterprise
SEIU Service Employees International Union
SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative
SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee
TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central)
TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County)
TRE or TTE Trustee
TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee
UASI Urban Area Security Initiative
VA Department of Veterans Affairs
vs . versus (against)
WAN Wide Area Network
WBE Women Business Enterprise
WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
Beacon Economics | beaconecon.com
Christopher Thornberg, PhD
Founding Partner, Beacon Economics
Director, UCR SoBA Center for Economic Forecasting and
Development
January 2023
Navigating the Stimulus Hangover
Focus on the Contra Costa County
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
RECESSION!!!
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Mixed Economic Signals in ‘22
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Real GDP Growth U of M Consumer Sentiment Index10 Year / 3 Month Yield Curve
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The US is clearly not in a recession
70.0
75.0
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
Mar-96Oct-97May-99Dec-00Jul-02Feb-04Sep-05Apr-07Nov-08Jun-10Jan-12Aug-13Mar-15Oct-16May-18Dec-19Jul-21US Industrial Production
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
Jan-98Jun-99Nov-00Apr-02Sep-03Feb-05Jul-06Dec-07May-09Oct-10Mar-12Aug-13Jan-15Jun-16Nov-17Apr-19Sep-20Feb-22Unemployment Rate
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Narrative: A recession is nigh!
—Economy already in crisis due to
inequality, tax rates, regulations, global
warming, (pick your fav boogie man)
—Inflation is crushing consumers
—Rates are crushing real estate
The Reality: Highly unlikely we will see
a recession in the next 2 years
—No major imbalances in the real economy
—Inflation and rising rates have never
caused a recession
—They are the consequences of the
excessive use of pandemic stimulus
What to expect in ‘23
—Consumers / biz investment will offset
weakness in real estate
—Asset prices will continue to slowly deflate
—Rates will likely stabilize as long as the
Fed sits on its hands
The real worries
—Collapse in filtering will intensify housing
shortages
—Labor shortages are a real problem
—Public deficit challenges
—The ongoing gap between the narrative
and the reality
So where are we heading?
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
How did we get here? The U or V debate…
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%2005Q12006Q12007Q12008Q12009Q12010Q12011Q12012Q12013Q12014Q12015Q12016Q12017Q12018Q12019Q12020Q12021Q12022Q1Federal Expenditures as a Share of GDP
Federal Fiscal (Over)reaction
$6.5 trillion in 2 years
Actual Lost GDP: $1.15
trillion
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
TrillionsFederal Reserve Balance Sheet
Holdings of Government Debt
Bernanke
$3.5T 08-14
Powell
$5T 20-21
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
What war was Jerome fighting?
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
03:Q104:Q105:Q106:Q107:Q108:Q109:Q110:Q111:Q112:Q113:Q114:Q115:Q116:Q117:Q118:Q119:Q120:Q121:Q122:Q1Share Consumer Debt 90+ Days
Delinquent
MORTGAGE HELOC AUTO CC
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1997:01:001998:02:001999:03:002000:04:002002:01:002003:02:002004:03:002005:04:002007:01:002008:02:002009:03:002010:04:002012:01:002013:02:002014:03:002015:04:002017:01:002018:02:002019:03:002020:04:002022:01:00Bank Delinquencies
CommercialRE C&I TotalL&L
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
QE and Money: Then vs Now
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%Jan-67Sep-68May-70Jan-72Sep-73May-75Jan-77Sep-78May-80Jan-82Sep-83May-85Jan-87Sep-88May-90Jan-92Sep-93May-95Jan-97Sep-98May-00Jan-02Sep-03May-05Jan-07Sep-08May-10Jan-12Sep-13May-15Jan-17Sep-18May-20Jan-22Money Supply (M2) 3 Year Growth Rates
1 Year Growth 3 Year Growth
Bernanke QE
$3.5T 08-14
Powell QE
$5T 20-211970’s inflation
driver: M1 growth
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
QE and Money: Then vs Now
The Problem of Excess Money
Short run: Money illusion
Falling interest rates
Asset price bubbles form
Spending and investment binge ensues
Long run: The Hangover
SR: Inflation and rates rise
SR: Asset markets sag
LR: Sharp transfers of real wealth
LR: Investments risk rises
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
1995-011996-091998-052000-012001-092003-052005-012006-092008-052010-012011-092013-052015-012016-092018-052020-012021-09Wealth Level in bottom 50% of
Household, $Billion
US asset bubbles and the wealth effect.
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%1985-011987-011989-011991-011993-011995-011997-011999-012001-012003-012005-012007-012009-012011-012013-012015-012017-012019-012021-01US Household Net Worth grew by $30
trillion from 2020-2022
3 Yr Growth %
Dot.com
(Equity)
Sub-prime
Jerome’s
(QE)
Sub-prime
(Debt)
Dot.com
(Equity)
Jerome’s
QE
Sub-prime
(Debt)
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Inflation nation…
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
Jan-14Jul-14Jan-15Jul-15Jan-16Jul-16Jan-17Jul-17Jan-18Jul-18Jan-19Jul-19Jan-20Jul-20Jan-21Jul-21Jan-22Jul-22Inflation (YoY)
CPI PCE
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Inflation Conversation
⏤Supply chain issues
⏤The federal deficit
⏤Greedy corporations and profiteering
⏤Not enough manufacturing jobs in the
US
⏤Biden’s bad green energy policies
⏤Putin’s fault!
⏤Saturn is aligned with Jupiter
⏤Kim shouldn’t have dumped Kanye
⏤The Lakers horrible perimeter defense
“Inflation is always and
everywhere a monetary
phenomenon in the sense
that it is and can be
produced only by a more
rapid increase in the quantity
of money than in output.”
Milton Friedman
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
How much farther can inflation go?
10% to 20%
increase in P
to offset M2
(with little real
growth)
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
19591961196419661969197119741976197919811984198619891991199419961999200120042006200920112014201620192021Unit Money Supply: M2 / (P * RGDP)
M2 32.5%
Real Output 4.1%
Inflation to date 12.7%
Remainder 15.5%
Growth Q419 to Q322
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Fed Response
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
13000
14000
15000
16000
17000
18000
19000
20000
21000
22000
23000
M2 and the Fed’s Balance Sheet
M2 (Left axis)
Fed Balance
Sheet (right axis)
~1.50.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
Aug-96Aug-98Aug-00Aug-02Aug-04Aug-06Aug-08Aug-10Aug-12Aug-14Aug-16Aug-18Aug-20Aug-22Federal Funds Rate
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Rate Response…
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
Treasury Rates
10 Yr Treas 1 Yr Treas
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%Jan-85Mar-87May-89Jul-91Sep-93Nov-95Jan-98Mar-00May-02Jul-04Sep-06Nov-08Jan-11Mar-13May-15Jul-17Sep-19Nov-21Inflation Expectations
Year 1 Year 2
5 Year: 2.31%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Shiller’s CAPE Price E10 Ratio
27.4
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
S&P 500
Gravity still works…
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Deals (000s)Capital ($, Billions)Capital Invested and Number of Deals,
Capital Invested ($B)Deal Count
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Recent Real GDP Growth
Contributions to Real GDP Growth
2019 2020 2021 2022
Gross domestic product 2.58 1.18 5.75 0.13
Final Demand 2.56 1.18 5.54 0.69
Personal consumption 1.45 0.39 4.74 1.09
Durable goods 0.40 1.40 0.59 0.11
Nondurable goods 0.32 0.81 1.04 -0.41
Services 0.74 -1.82 3.11 1.39
Fixed investment 0.42 0.51 0.67 -0.33
Structures 0.20 -0.50 -0.14 -0.29
Equipment -0.18 0.06 0.28 0.33
Intellectual property 0.33 0.22 0.56 0.45
Residential 0.08 0.74 -0.02 -0.82
Change inventories -0.38 0.79 0.93 -0.82
Net exports 0.40 -0.79 -0.72 0.27
Exports 0.11 -0.83 0.70 0.87
Imports 0.29 0.03 -1.41 -0.60
Government 0.69 0.29 0.12 -0.09
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Real Change SAAR
GDP Final Demand'
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Bad News?
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
Jan-05Sep-05May-06Jan-07Sep-07May-08Jan-09Sep-09May-10Jan-11Sep-11May-12Jan-13Sep-13May-14Jan-15Sep-15May-16Jan-17Sep-17May-18Jan-19Sep-19May-20Jan-21Sep-21May-22Nominal Retail Sales to December
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Still Pent-Up Consumer Demand
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
15.0
17.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
1995-09-011997-03-011998-09-012000-03-012001-09-012003-03-012004-09-012006-03-012007-09-012009-03-012010-09-012012-03-012013-09-012015-03-012016-09-012018-03-012019-09-012021-03-01New Auto Sales SAAR (Mil Units)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Jan-93Oct-94Jul-96Apr-98Jan-00Oct-01Jul-03Apr-05Jan-07Oct-08Jul-10Apr-12Jan-14Oct-15Jul-17Apr-19Jan-21Inventories of Autos for Sale US
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
A shift back to consumer services…
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
Jan-18May-18Sep-18Jan-19May-19Sep-19Jan-20May-20Sep-20Jan-21May-21Sep-21Jan-22May-22Retail Sales on Food
Restaurants Groceries
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$, MillionsClark County Gaming Revenue
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Travel
Source: VisitCalifornia
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Aug-19Oct-19Dec-19Feb-20Apr-20Jun-20Aug-20Oct-20Dec-20Feb-21Apr-21Jun-21Aug-21Oct-21Dec-21Feb-22Apr-22Jun-22Aug-22Indexed Air Passengers
OAK SFO SJC
Region
ADR Occupancy Rate
Q3-22 3-Yr Dif Q3-22 3-Yr Dif
US Total $141.7 $14.5 67.4 2.3
East Bay $144.5 -$8.5 77.2 0.7
Inland Empire $120.5 $11.3 72.1 -0.2
San Francisco $240.0 $27.5 80.7 -1.5
LA (MD)$178.8 $19.7 75.1 -5.3
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Business Activity -Contra Costa County
Source: CDTFA, HdL
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Taxable Sales (SA, $, Billions)Taxable Sales
*YTD through Q3
Category
Q3-22
Sales Tax
Receipts
($, Mil.)
1-YR % Growth
Contra
Costa CA
Total 57.1 5.3 8.0
Fuel and Service Stations 5.8 23.7 21.8
Business and Industry 6.4 12.4 9.7
Restaurants and Hotels 6.2 7.4 10.1
County & State Pool 12.1 4.8 7.3
General Consumer Goods 10.2 3.6 2.9
Food and Drugs 3.3 -1.1 0.3
Autos and Transportation 8.3 -1.5 6.0
Building and Construction 0.0 -99.1 7.9
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Can the consumer survive? Context…
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%Jan-69Jan-72Jan-75Jan-78Jan-81Jan-84Jan-87Jan-90Jan-93Jan-96Jan-99Jan-02Jan-05Jan-08Jan-11Jan-14Jan-17Jan-205 Year Cumulative Inflation (PCE Basis)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1980-01-011982-04-011984-07-011986-10-011989-01-011991-04-011993-07-011995-10-011998-01-012000-04-012002-07-012004-10-012007-01-012009-04-012011-07-012013-10-012016-01-012018-04-012020-07-01US Financial Obligations Ratio
(% of DPI)
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Income Issue
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%Jan-97Jun-98Nov-99Apr-01Sep-02Feb-04Jul-05Dec-06May-08Oct-09Mar-11Aug-12Jan-14Jun-15Nov-16Apr-18Sep-19Feb-21Jul-22US Savings Rate
13000.0
14000.0
15000.0
16000.0
17000.0
18000.0
19000.0
20000.0
2017-04-012017-08-012017-12-012018-04-012018-08-012018-12-012019-04-012019-08-012019-12-012020-04-012020-08-012020-12-012021-04-012021-08-012021-12-012022-04-012022-08-01US Real Disposable Income
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Income vs Wealth
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
4500000
5000000
1996-011997-081999-032000-102002-052003-122005-072007-022008-092010-042011-112013-062015-012016-082018-032019-102021-05Households: Checkable Deposits and
Currency ($Mil)
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
2011-012011-092012-052013-012013-092014-052015-012015-092016-052017-012017-092018-052019-012019-092020-052021-012021-092022-05Real HH Net Worth ($tril) to Q3
3 years: +13%, up
$14 trillion
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Indexed Balance of Checkable Deposits and Currency by
Income Level
50th to 90th 90th to 99th Bottom 50
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Contradictory Efforts
-4500000
-4000000
-3500000
-3000000
-2500000
-2000000
-1500000
-1000000
-500000
0
500000
Dec-81Sep-84Jun-87Mar-90Dec-92Sep-95Jun-98Mar-01Dec-03Sep-06Jun-09Mar-12Dec-14Sep-17Jun-20Federal Deficit 12 month rolling sum
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Business is managing as well…
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1993-10-011995-04-011996-10-011998-04-011999-10-012001-04-012002-10-012004-04-012005-10-012007-04-012008-10-012010-04-012011-10-012013-04-012014-10-012016-04-012017-10-012019-04-012020-10-012022-04-01Non-Financial Corporate Debt to Equity
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2006Q12007Q12008Q12009Q12010Q12011Q12012Q12013Q12014Q12015Q12016Q12017Q12018Q12019Q12020Q12021Q12022Q1Business Profits
Proprietors' income with IVA and CCAdj
Corporate profits with IVA and CCAdj
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Business’s real issue…
Source: VisitCalifornia
Job Openings Rate by Sector Jul-19 Jul-22
Total private 4.2 7.7
Health care 2.8 9.3
Leisure hospitality 6.7 9.3
Professional 5.4 9.0
Logistics 3.9 8.0
Other services 3.7 7.5
Financial activities 2.6 7.0
Information 3.9 7.0
Retail trade 4.9 6.5
Manufacturing 2.5 6.2
Education 2.6 6.0
Mining and logging 3.7 5.7
Government 1.5 5.2
Wholesale trade 2.8 4.9
Local education 1.6 4.7
Construction 5.1 4.7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jan-01Feb-02Mar-03Apr-04May-05Jun-06Jul-07Aug-08Sep-09Oct-10Nov-11Dec-12Jan-14Feb-15Mar-16Apr-17May-18Jun-19Jul-20Aug-21Sep-22US Job Opening Rate
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Era of Labor Shortages is Here
-1.0%
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
19601966197219781984199019962002200820142020202620322038204420502056Prime Working Years Population Growth
(Census)
Population 25-54 Growth
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
1949195319571961196519691973197719811985198919931997200120052009201320172021YoY Growth US Labor Force
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Business Investment
40000
45000
50000
55000
60000
65000
70000
75000
80000
Oct-96May-98Dec-99Jul-01Feb-03Sep-04Apr-06Nov-07Jun-09Jan-11Aug-12Mar-14Oct-15May-17Dec-18Jul-20Feb-22New Orders Non-Defense Capital
GoodsReal Business Investment 2019 2022
Q3 Q3
Private fixed investment 3437.0 3550.5 3.3%
Software 471.3 653.5 38.7%
Information processing eq 486.6 582.3 19.7%
Research and development 459.5 540.3 17.6%
Entertainment, literary 85.0 94.8 11.5%
Industrial equipment 248.7 258.9 4.1%
Manufacturing 63.3 59.8 -5.5%
Transportation equipment 270.8 249.1 -8.0%
Commercial and health care 172.0 136.5 -20.6%
Mining exploration 132.0 100.2 -24.1%
Power and communication 123.2 79.9 -35.1%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
A 2 -edged sword…
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1/1/994/1/007/1/0110/1/021/1/044/1/057/1/0610/1/071/1/094/1/107/1/1110/1/121/1/144/1/157/1/1610/1/171/1/194/1/207/1/21Growth in Worker Earnings by Quartile
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Location Aug-19 Aug-22
Fresno 796 987 24.0%
Las Vegas 818 978 19.6%
San Diego 1034 1234 19.3%
Sacramento 960 1134 18.1%
Orange County 1110 1294 16.6%
Inland Empire 854 992 16.2%
Los Angeles 1101 1277 16.0%
Portland 1050 1213 15.5%
Phoenix 989 1126 13.9%
San Francisco 1543 1756 13.8%
Santa Barbara 931 1002 7.6%
Bakersfield 1006 1074 6.7%
San Jose 1631 1717 5.2%
East Bay 1227 1275 3.9%
Seattle 1453 1450 -0.2%
Average Weekly Earnings
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Regionally? Who is Ahead? Behind?
Payrolls Gr 14-22 Gr 19-22
1 Idaho 825.4 26.1%8.2%
2 Utah 1676.3 26.0%7.3%
3 Florida 9460.5 20.4%5.3%
4 Arizona 3088.7 20.0%4.6%
5 Nevada 1462.0 19.7%3.0%
6 Texas 13539.1 16.3%5.3%
7 Colorado 2874.2 16.2%2.6%
8 North Carolina 4804.3 15.8%4.6%
9 Georgia 4821.8 15.8%4.2%
10 Washington 3522.5 14.8%1.3%
11 Tennessee 3247.0 14.6%3.8%
12 South Carolina 2238.7 14.5%1.9%
13 Oregon 1974.7 14.0%0.8%
14 California 17650.9 13.0%1.1%
15 Montana 506.0 11.2%4.1%
Payroll Job Gains 14 to 22Alaska10.1 4.1 South Carolina 7.4 2.5 Nebraska 6.6 1.9
Kentucky 7.9 3.4 Iowa 6.9 2.4 Arizona 7.1 1.7
Georgia 7.9 3.1 Oklahoma 7.2 2.4 Wisconsin 6.7 1.7
Tennessee 7.6 2.9 Maine 7.0 2.4 Pennsylvania 5.9 1.6
Illinois 6.9 2.9 Hawaii 7.1 2.4 Florida 6.2 1.6
Massachusetts 7.2 2.8 Alabama 6.8 2.3 Utah 6.4 1.5
Delaware 7.3 2.8 Vermont 7.4 2.3 Indiana 6.5 1.5
Mississippi 7.3 2.7 Michigan 6.9 2.3 Arkansas 6.7 1.5
Montana 8.3 2.7 California 6.5 2.2 North Dakota 7.0 1.5
Louisiana 7.5 2.7 New Hampshire 6.7 2.2 New Jersey 5.7 1.4
Wyoming 8.4 2.7 Rhode Island 6.9 2.2 Kansas 6.4 1.4
Connecticut 6.5 2.7 South Dakota 7.1 2.1 New Mexico 7.4 1.3
Virginia 7.9 2.7 Maryland 7.0 2.1 Missouri 6.4 1.3
Minnesota 7.1 2.6 Colorado 7.4 2.1 Oregon 6.5 1.3
Texas 7.2 2.6 Ohio 6.8 2.1 New York 5.4 1.2
Nevada 6.8 2.6 Idaho 7.2 2.0 Washington 6.1 1.2
West Virginia 8.3 2.6 District of Columbia 5.9 1.9 North Carolina 7.0 1.1
Current State Job Opening Rate, with change 19-22
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Regional Outcomes
0
50
100
150
200
250
% (SA)Indexed Job Openings
California Oregon Washington
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Jan-07May-08Sep-09Jan-11May-12Sep-13Jan-15May-16Sep-17Jan-19May-20Sep-21Unemployment Rate
Washington Oregon California
95
100
105
110
115
120
Index LF (SA)Indexed Labor Force
California Oregon Washington
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Real California Story
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Mar-88Mar-90Mar-92Mar-94Mar-96Mar-98Mar-00Mar-02Mar-04Mar-06Mar-08Mar-10Mar-12Mar-14Mar-16Mar-18Mar-20Mar-22Private Housing Permits
California Texas
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%201120132015201720192021202320252027202920312033203520372039204120432045California Population Forecasts by
Age (CA DoF est.)
15-64 65+
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Vacancies and Housing Costs
Source: REIS
2018 2021 2018 2021
California 29.4%29.6%45.4%46.4%
Los Angeles 34.3%35.2%47.8%49.6%
Riverside 31.9%31.1%51.6%48.8%
San
Bernardino 27.7%28.6%48.2%46.8%
Sacramento 24.4%24.2%45.8%46.0%
Fresno 24.5%25.5%46.9%44.9%
Santa Clara 25.5%25.3%36.4%34.7%
Share Households > 35%
Housing Cost to Income
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
198619881990199219941996199820002002200420062008201020122014201620182020California Housing Vacancy
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The State Employment Situation
Unemployment Payrolls Labor Force
Unemployment Rate Jul-19 Jul-22 Jul-22 Ch 19-22 Jul-22 Ch 19-22
California 4.0 3.9 17,618 1.1%19,327 -0.4%
Inland Empire 3.9 3.3 1,667 7.2%2,184 5.0%
Stockton 5.7 4.5 263 6.6%335 2.5%
Sacramento 3.5 2.8 1,055 3.0%1,122 1.5%
Fresno 7.1 5.3 377 4.3%456 1.5%
Bakersfield 7.9 5.9 279 2.9%386 0.8%
San Jose 2.5 1.8 1,168 1.9%1,086 0.0%
San Diego 3.1 2.6 1,519 1.0%1,585 -0.3%
Santa Barbara 3.4 2.6 195 1.1%221 -0.8%
Modesto 6.0 4.5 184 1.5%241 -0.9%
San Francisco (MD)2.0 1.7 1,178 -0.8%1,034 -1.0%
Orange County (MD)2.6 2.2 1,676 -0.1%1,605 -1.2%
Oakland (MD)2.9 2.4 1,181 -0.6%1,385 -1.7%
Ventura 3.4 2.7 308 -1.3%411 -3.0%
Los Angeles (MD)4.4 4.9 4,532 -0.6%5,022 -3.1%
Santa Rosa 2.6 2.2 204 -2.6%250 -3.4%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Labor Markets
Source: REIS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
%Unemployment Rate
East Bay San Francisco San Jose
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
IndexedLabor Force
East Bay San Francisco San Jose
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Employment –East Bay
Source: California EDD, QCEW
420
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
Employment (000s, SA)Total Employment
Industry
Q4-22
Emp
(000s)
3-Yr
Chg
(000s)
3-Yr %
Growth
Total Nonfarm 1185.3 -10.6 -0.9
Manufacturing 115.3 13.7 13.5
Education/Health 208.9 8.4 4.2
Trade,Transport,Util.203.2 2.8 1.4
Prof Sci and Tech 104.9 2.4 2.4
Retail Trade 109.3 -1.9 -1.7
Information 25.1 -2.2 -8.1
Construction 73.8 -2.6 -3.4
Wholesale Trade 42.2 -2.7 -6.1
Admin Support 65.3 -3.6 -5.2
Financial Activities 51.4 -4.3 -7.7
Government 164.2 -10.9 -6.2
Leisure and Hospitality 107.8 -12.9 -10.7
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Contra Costa Employment
290000
300000
310000
320000
330000
340000
350000
360000
370000
380000
Q1-13Q4-13Q3-14Q2-15Q1-16Q4-16Q3-17Q2-18Q1-19Q4-19Q3-20Q2-21Q1-22Payroll Employment
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
480,000
500,000
520,000
540,000
560,000
Jan-12Mar-13May-14Jul-15Sep-16Nov-17Jan-19Mar-20May-21Jul-22Household Employment
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%Jan-10Apr-11Jul-12Oct-13Jan-15Apr-16Jul-17Oct-18Jan-20Apr-21Jul-22Unemployment Rate
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
CCC Employment
2019
Dec
2021
Dec Ch
Total, All Industries 380,000 368,400 -11,600
Health Care & Social Assistance 65,200 68,500 3,300
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 12,600 14,300 1,700
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 25,300 26,000 700
Administrative & Support & Waste Services 24,300 24,600 300
Retail Trade 43,300 43,300 0
Educational Services 7,800 7,100 -700
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 6,500 5,800 -700
Wholesale Trade 8,900 8,100 -800
Information 7,000 5,800 -1,200
Management of Companies & Enterprises 8,600 7,300 -1,300
Other Services 13,600 12,300 -1,300
Mining, Logging and Construction 26,200 24,500 -1,700
Manufacturing 15,700 14,000 -1,700
Financial Activities 26,900 24,600 -2,300
Accommodation & Food Services 36,000 33,300 -2,700
Government 51,600 48,300 -3,300
20000
22000
24000
26000
28000
30000
32000
34000
36000
38000
2006-012007-022008-032009-042010-052011-062012-072013-082014-092015-102016-112017-122019-012020-022021-032022-04Private Sector Establishments
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Income Dynamics
Source: Equifax, US Federal Housing Finance Agency
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Percent of Total PopSubprime Credit Population,
Contra Costa County
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021Inequality
CC AL SC
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
199720002003200620092012201520182021Poverty Rate
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Earnings Growth 17-21 (ACS)
Contra Costa Antioch city Concord city Pittsburg city Richmond city
Median earnings (dollars) for full-time, year-
round workers with earnings 78453 17.6%64250 40.0%70820 14.6%51200 21.1%64008 47.2%
Mean earnings (dollars) for full-time, year-
round workers with earnings 112783 20.3%78333 35.5%89721 22.6%62498 5.4%84187 46.7%
MEDIAN EARNINGS BY EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT
Less than high school graduate 32357 23.2%35298 41.2%30781 13.5%30179 14.6%31883 18.6%
High school graduate (includes equivalency)44787 27.1%40873 30.9%47740 28.1%44455 79.2%36045 -11.3%
Some college or associate's degree 51527 22.7%52393 27.7%54137 35.2%47640 30.9%42831 28.1%
Bachelor's degree 83427 11.8%70804 27.0%75384 13.4%62376 3.1%76428 27.7%
Graduate or professional degree 103589 8.2%79861 52.3%90577 12.2%87824 63.3%80109 -1.1%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Population
Source: California DOF
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Components of Change (Thousands)Population (Millions)Contra Costa Population
Population Net Migration
Select
Cities 2022 Population 1-Yr % Growth
County Total 1,156,555 -0.4
Oakley 44,533 2.1
Brentwood 64,342 0.2
Danville 43,352 0.0
Antioch 115,074 -0.1
El Cerrito 25,650 -0.1
Richmond 114,489 -0.1
Orinda 19,478 -0.1
Incorporated 979,614 -0.4
San Ramon 83,820 -0.5
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Contra Costa Labor Force
470000
480000
490000
500000
510000
520000
530000
540000
550000
560000
570000
Jan-04Feb-05Mar-06Apr-07May-08Jun-09Jul-10Aug-11Sep-12Oct-13Nov-14Dec-15Jan-17Feb-18Mar-19Apr-20May-21Jun-22Labor Force
2021 Ch 15-21
% Ch 15-
21
Population 25 to 64 years 500008 25954 5.5%
Less than high school 43594 1115 2.6%
High school graduate 83726 5003 6.4%
Some college or
associate's degree 127953 -19114 -13.0%
Bachelor's degree or
higher 244561 38965 19.0%
Age < 30 124197 -1905 -1.5%
Age 30-54 333119 15656 4.9%
Age 55+151624 21972 16.9%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Solutions
—Extensive: Increasing labor
force through immigration
(SR) or birthrates (LR)
—Intensive: Raising
participation rates among
the existing population
—Productivity enhancements:
capital investments / skill
training
Labor Shortage Solutions
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
How About Residential Markets?
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
3500.0
4000.0
4500.0
5000.0
5500.0
6000.0
6500.0
7000.0
Jan-97Jun-99Nov-01Apr-04Sep-06Feb-09Jul-11Dec-13May-16Oct-18Mar-21Existing Homes Sales
(000’s. SAAR)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
Jan-88Mar-91May-94Jul-97Sep-00Nov-03Jan-07Mar-10May-13Jul-16Sep-19Months Supply New
Homes For sale
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Jan-88Dec-90Nov-93Oct-96Sep-99Aug-02Jul-05Jun-08May-11Apr-14Mar-17Feb-20Single Family Housing Starts
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Housing Market
Source: CoreLogic
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Home Sales (000s)Median Home Price ($, 000s)Contra Costa Home Prices and Sales
Median Price Home Sales
County
Median Prices Home Sales
Q2-22
($)
1-Yr %
Gr Q2-22 1-Yr %
Gr
Alameda 1,309,808 17.1 2,956 -23
Ventura 885,635 12.5 1,748 -22.5
Monterey 832,955 6.2 682 -21.0
San Francisco 1,776,255 5.7 776 -12.6
Contra Costa 885,830 3.4 2,952 -22.2
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Sticker Shock
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
$28,000
$30,000
1971-04-011975-04-011979-04-011983-04-011987-04-011991-04-011995-04-011999-04-012003-04-012007-04-012011-04-012015-04-012019-04-01New Home Cost (Annual payment
100% LTV)Tampa 64.0%Los Angeles 37.9%
Phoenix 62.0%San Francisco 35.1%
Miami 61.4%New York 34.9%
Dallas 54.2%Boston 34.6%
Charlotte 49.5%Portland 33.6%
Las Vegas 49.2%Cleveland 30.9%
San Diego 49.1%Detroit 29.4%
Atlanta 45.8%Chicago 27.4%
Seattle 43.9%DC 26.0%
Denver 40.3%Minneapolis 24.6%
Case Shiller HPA
July 20 –July 22
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Market Collapse? Not a chance…
Northeast Midwest South West
Vacant Year
Round 2022 7.6%7.4%9.6%6.6%
For Sale / Rent 2.0%2.4%2.7%2.0%
Vacant Year
Round 2012 8.9%9.9%12.6%9.0%
For Sale / Rent 3.3%4.0%4.7%3.5%
Vacant Year
Round 2008 8.6%9.8%12.3%8.4%
For Sale / Rent 3.6%4.9%5.3%3.6%
Overall Housing Vacancy
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Jan-90Dec-91Nov-93Oct-95Sep-97Aug-99Jul-01Jun-03May-05Apr-07Mar-09Feb-11Jan-13Dec-14Nov-16Oct-18Sep-20Months Supply of Existing Homes
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Market Collapse? Not a chance…
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
195919621966196919731976198019841987199119941998200220052009201220162019Real Equity in US Real Estate
(Households, $Bil 1-4 family)
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%03:Q104:Q105:Q106:Q107:Q108:Q109:Q110:Q111:Q112:Q113:Q114:Q115:Q116:Q117:Q118:Q119:Q120:Q121:Q122:Q1Share Mortgage Debt > 720 FICO
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Recent Numbers
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
2016-072016-122017-052017-102018-032018-082019-012019-062019-112020-042020-092021-022021-072021-122022-052022-10Active Listings California
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
2016-072016-122017-052017-102018-032018-082019-012019-062019-112020-042020-092021-022021-072021-122022-052022-10Listing Price: California
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Local Situation: CC County
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000
2016-072016-112017-032017-072017-112018-032018-072018-112019-032019-072019-112020-032020-072020-112021-032021-072021-112022-032022-072022-11Asking Price
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
2016-072016-122017-052017-102018-032018-082019-012019-062019-112020-042020-092021-022021-072021-122022-052022-10Listings
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Market Driver: Housing Demand
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Q1-03Q2-04Q3-05Q4-06Q1-08Q2-09Q3-10Q4-11Q1-13Q2-14Q3-15Q4-16Q1-18Q2-19Q3-20Q4-21US Apartment Markets
Rent Vacancy
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jan-89Apr-91Jul-93Oct-95Jan-98Apr-00Jul-02Oct-04Jan-07Apr-09Jul-11Oct-13Jan-16Apr-18Jul-20Starts 5+ Unit Buildings
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Apartments
Source: REIS
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Rent ($)Cost of Rent
East Contra Costa West Contra Costa
San Francsico San Jose
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
%Vacancy Rates
East Contra Costa West Contra Costa
San Francisco San Jose
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Household Income
Source: ACS
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
Percent of IncomeMedian Rent as % of HH Income
Alameda Contra Costa
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Residential Permits –Bay Area
Source: CIRB
County
Single-family
Permits
Multifamily
Permits
2022*
1-Yr
Abs.
Chg
2022*
1-Yr
Abs.
Chg
San Francisco 266 131 3,380 564
Monterey 404 -59 451 155
Santa Clara 1,299 -475 4,378 1,237
Alameda 1,011 -517 2,438 -1,641
Contra Costa 1,337 -870 548 -1,153
Sacramento 3,160 -1,019 4,100 1,834
*YTD through Q3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Permits (000s)Number of Permits, Total Bay
Multifamily Single-Family
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Non-Residential Markets
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
Jan-94Nov-95Sep-97Jul-99May-01Mar-03Jan-05Nov-06Sep-08Jul-10May-12Mar-14Jan-16Nov-17Sep-19Jul-21Non-Residential Construction
Spending
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Nonresidential Rents and Vacancies
Source: REIS
Office Cost of Rent Vacancy Rates
Q3-22 ($/sf)1-Yr % Gr Q3-22 (%)1-Yr Abs. Chg
North I-680 30.1 -0.1 12.2 -0.5
North Contra Costa 33.2 -0.3 20.1 2.3
West Contra Costa 31.7 -0.6 21.4 0.9
Retail
Central Contra Costa 35.5 0.1 8.2 0.0
East Contra Costa 24.8 0.1 9.9 0.3
West Contra Costa 35.2 0.1 9.7 0.0
Warehousing/Distribution
Concord/Pittsburg 7.1 20.4 1.0 -5.7
Berkeley, Richmond,
and Martinez 8.7 17.5 3.5 -2.5
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Nonres Real Estate –Contra Costa County
Source: CIRB
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Permit Valuations ($, Millions)Permit Values
Commercial Alterations
Permit Type
2022*
Permit Value
($, Mil)
Abs. Change
vs. 2021*
($, Mil)
Hotel 14.5 14.5
Alterations 226.6 83.4
Commercial 30.4 -82.7
Retail 15.7 -48.8
Office 0.1 -29.7
*YTD through Q3
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Office Space
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
Q1-02Q1-03Q1-04Q1-05Q1-06Q1-07Q1-08Q1-09Q1-10Q1-11Q1-12Q1-13Q1-14Q1-15Q1-16Q1-17Q1-18Q1-19Q1-20Q1-21Q1-22National Trends
Rent Vacancy Rate
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Change Vacancy 19-22Log Size of Market (SF)
Mixed Results
SF
Seattle
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Work -from-home Trends
Source: ACS, SWAA, Barrero, Bloom, and Davis (2021)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Days WFH / weekWFH: Employer Plans vs Worker Desires
Employer Plans Worker Desires
0
5
10
15
20
25
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
California (21.4%)Los Angeles (20.9%)
Orange (22.2%)Riverside (13.7%)
San Bernardino (13.6%)San Diego (22.1%)
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Fiscal Situation
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1980Q1Q4Q3Q21987Q1Q4Q3Q21994Q1Q4Q3Q22001Q1Q4Q3Q22008Q1Q4Q3Q22015Q1Q4Q3Q22022Q1Federal Debt % GDP
Federal Debt % GDP
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%1980Q1Q4Q3Q21987Q1Q4Q3Q21994Q1Q4Q3Q22001Q1Q4Q3Q22008Q1Q4Q3Q22015Q1Q4Q3Q22022Q1Federal Flows % GDP
Deficit
CBO Forecast
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Are Global Bond Markets Afraid?
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
2006-01-012006-07-012007-01-012007-07-012008-01-012008-07-012009-01-012009-07-012010-01-012010-07-012011-01-012011-07-012012-01-012012-07-012013-01-012013-07-012014-01-012014-07-012015-01-012015-07-012016-01-012016-07-012017-01-012017-07-012018-01-012018-07-012019-01-012019-07-012020-01-012020-07-012021-01-012021-07-012022-01-012022-07-01Real Value of $US
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
Growing Pressures
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%1980Q11982Q11984Q11986Q11988Q11990Q11992Q11994Q11996Q11998Q12000Q12002Q12004Q12006Q12008Q12010Q12012Q12014Q12016Q12018Q12020Q12022Q1Federal Interest Payments as
% of GDP
Interest Payments
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
The Local Risks
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%2003Q12004Q12005Q12006Q12007Q12008Q12009Q12010Q12011Q12012Q12013Q12014Q12015Q12016Q12017Q12018Q12019Q12020Q12021Q12022Q1Federal Support for S&L Gov Spending State Local
Intergovernmental revenue
From Federal Government 26.7%3.4%
From State government1 27.5%
General revenue from own sources 57.6%58.6%
Taxes 41.9%37.6%
Property 0.7%27.0%
Sales and gross receipts 19.5%6.7%
Individual income 15.8%1.8%
Corporate income 2.3%0.4%
Motor vehicle license 1.1%0.1%
Current charges 9.5%15.9%
Miscellaneous general revenue 6.2%5.1%
Beacon EconomicsBeacon Economics
•Bay Area
•Not quite the dystopian place
often portrayed
•Region saw enormous
expansion pre-Covid, some
settling to be expected
•Cooling in VC will only help
other sectors
•Overall demand for tech to
remain strong
•Housing in short supply—
convert old office space?
•Governance matters
A bumpy path ahead…
•Potential Scenarios
•What will the Fed do? Raise it til
they break it?
•Wild cards: Long run fiscal
situation, US terms of trade
•Global situation: China is
swooning
•Gap between economic reality
and political narratives still
dangerously wide
•Expansion to Continue
•Asset values to fall, liquidity
drying up
•Construction to be cold
•Inflation will continue to be hot
•Wealth and income will drive
consumer spending
•Underlying asset quality to remain
strong
•Economy is brittle—small shocks
can have big consequences
Thank You
Chris@BeaconEcon.com | beaconecon.com
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the report from Beacon Economics: "Navigating the Stimulus Hangover; Focus on Contra Costa
County."
FISCAL IMPACT:
This report is for informational purposes and has no specific fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the Beacon Economics report: "Navigating the Stimulus Hangover; Focus on Contra Costa County."
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 01/24/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Adam Nguyen, (925) 665-2048
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 24, 2023
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.1
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:January 24, 2023
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Report from Beacon Economics
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Board voted 5-0 to accept updated slide presentation.
Public Comments: Mariana, Roxanne, Caller 6770
ATTACHMENTS
Navigating the Stimulus Hangover; Focus on Contra Costa County (Updated)
January 24, 2023
to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
by Ryan Fukumori, Ph.D., Senior Associate, PolicyLink
Summarizing the State of EquityinContra Costa County
How do we measure community health and wellbeing from an equity perspective?
•Data snapshots from US Census & American Community Survey
•Excerpts from our analytical reports and data tools (Bay Area Equity Atlas
and National Equity Atlas)
•Testimonials from Contra Costa County community members
MAIN DATA SOURCES
•Offer a high-level summary of equity concerns in Contra Costa County to
inform Supervisors’ considerations re: budget allocation
•Support government and community efforts to operationalize the county’s
Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice in 2023
TODAY’S GOALS
Bay Area Equity Atlas (bayareaequityatlas.org)
A comprehensive data support system to track the state of equity across the region and equip community leaders with data to inform solutions for inclusive prosperity.
•23 equity indicators for 272 geographies (cities, counties, Census tracts, etc.)
•Policy solutions
•Original demographic & socioeconomic research/analysis
•Training
•Data support for advocacy campaigns
THREE KEY TRENDS
#1 : THE ENDURING LEGACY of RACIAL EXCLUSIONDespite a more diverse population, significant racial disparities in housing have persisted in the County despite the enactment of fair housing laws in the 1960s.
#2 : THE INEQUITABLE LANDSCAPE BEFORE COVID-19Existing housing, employment, and health disparities in Contra Costa County led to residents of color facing higher financial and health risks during, and after, the shelter-in-place order.
#3 : ONGOING DISPARITIES IN COVID-19 RECOVERYResidents of color have been slower to financially recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, reinforcing if not worsening these longstanding inequities.
TREND #1 : THE ENDURING LEGACY of RACIAL EXCLUSIONSince the 1960s, Contra Costa County has become more racially diverse.
Percent of White Residents by Census Tract, 1960 –2020
(includes Hispanic/Latino residents who identify as white)
Source: 1970 US Census & 2016-2020 American Community Survey Data, mapped on Social Explorer
TREND #1 : THE ENDURING LEGACY of RACIAL EXCLUSIONHowever,major racial inequities have persisted in Contra Costa County since the Civil Rights Era.
Source: 1970 US Census & 2016-2020 American Community Survey Data, via Social Explorer and IPUMS
In 2020, 45%of all county residents living in families met HUD standards for low-income or very low-income status, vs. 59% of Black and 60% of Latino family household members.
40%
50%
60%
70%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Homeownership Rate in CCC by Decade
All Residents Black Latino
0%
10%
20%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Poverty Rate in CCC by Decade
All Residents Black Latino
TREND #1 : THE ENDURING LEGACY of RACIAL EXCLUSIONContra Costa County is home to 5 of the 20 most segregated wealthy, white Census tracts* in the 9-County Bay Area, per a recent Bay Area Equity Atlas study.
Source: Bay Area Equity Atlas, “One in 10 Bay Area Neighborhoods are Segregated Areas of White Wealth” (2022)
*These neighborhoods make up parts of Orinda, Lafayette, and Alamo.
TREND #2 : THE INEQUITABLE LANDSCAPE BEFORE COVID-19In the decades leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, renters in Contra Costa County faced growing challenges with housing affordability.
ALL MONETARY FIGURES WERE INFLATION ADJUSTED TO 2021 DOLLAR VALUES.
Source: 2000 US Census & 2016-2020 American Community Survey Data, via Social Explorer
•Between 2000 and 2020:
o The county’s median rent increased by 42%, while the median household income for renters increased by just 11%.
o The share of rent-burdened households* grew by 9 percentage points (41% to 50%).
•Compared to white households, Black households were twice as likely to be overcrowded in 2020. Latino households were 8 times as likely to be overcrowded.**
* Defined as spending more than 30% of income on rent and utilities.** Defined as more than one occupant per room in the unit, minus kitchens and bathrooms.
It’s not fair that working people have to [struggle] for a roof over their head that is literally crumbling.
EDITH PASTRANO, ALLIANCE of CALIFORNIANS for COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, to the EAST BAYTIMES(2022)
TREND #2 : THE INEQUITABLE LANDSCAPE BEFORE COVID-19Income inequality in Contra Costa County has worsened over the past two generations.
Since 1980, pay for the highest-wage workers has increased, while earned income has decreased for those with thelowest paying jobs.
Source: ReWork the Bay Data Dashboards for Contra Costa County
Earned Income Growth for Full-Time Workers inContraCostaCounty, 1980 -2019
TREND #2 : THE INEQUITABLE LANDSCAPE BEFORE COVID-19Prior to COVID-19, local residents of color were disproportionately represented in occupations that predisposed workers to COVID-19 risk.
Contra Costa County Residents by Race/Ethnicity (2020 Data)% of Workforce in Service, Manufacturing, & Transportation % of Workforce in Business, Finance, STEM, and Arts
Non-Hispanic White 18%55%
Asian American 22%55%
ALL RESIDENTS 26%46%
Black 32%37%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 37%26%
Latino 41%25%
American Indian/Alaskan Native 41%26%
Source: 2016-2020 American Community Survey Data, via Social Explorer
TREND #2 : THE INEQUITABLE LANDSCAPE BEFORE COVID-19Residents of color are concentrated in areas adjacent to the refineries, which elevate asthma rates. These respiratory disabilities can make COVID-19 more dangerous.
Source: 2016-2020 American Community Survey Data, mapped on Social Explorer; Reina Rau, “Asthma rates near oil refineries and terminals in Contra Costa County” (2017)
Percent of Nonwhite Residents by Census Tract, 2020
Pollution Burden by Census Tract, 2017
A few people in my family have respiratory issues. The elderly people in my family, my mom and my auntie –they can’t breathe and they’re always sick.
BRANDY KHANSOUVONG, ASIAN PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK & RICHMOND RESIDENT, to THE GUARDIAN (2022)
TREND #3 : ONGOING DISPARITIES IN COVID-19 RECOVERYBlack and Latino residents in Contra Costa County died from COVID-19 at elevated rates before vaccines became widely accessible.
Increased spread of the disease can also lead to increased levels of long COVID, which threatens to remove people from the workforce and imperil households dependent on the incomes of newly disabled family members.
COVID-19 Cases and Deaths Relative to White Residents, Contra Costa County (Through December 2020)
TREND #3 : ONGOING DISPARITIES IN COVID-19 RECOVERYThousandsofresidentsinContraCosta County still face rental debts incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and eviction moratorium.
Source: National Equity Atlas, ”Rent Debt in America” interactive dashboard (orig. 2021, updated Dec. 2022)
We estimate that, as of December 2022:
•There are 11,700 households in Contra Costa County that are behind on rent.
•The cumulative rental debt totals $51.2 million,or an averageof$4,400 per household.
•Roughly 6,600 children live in these households behind on their rent.
For these families (and many others), surging inflation and the looming threat of a recession can only compound their ongoing financial burdens.
Since tenants didn’t have lawyers, [landlord] stories became over-simplified, morally and legally, in ways that forced families from their homes.
REV. MILLIE PHILLIPS, FAITH ALLIANCE for a MORAL ECONOMY, RECOUNTING THEIR EXPERIENCE
AS AN EVICTION COURT OBSERVER IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (2022)
TREND #3 : ONGOING DISPARITIES IN COVID-19 RECOVERYAcross the Bay Area, residents of color have been slower to recover financial losses from the pandemic, and still are likelier to struggle with meeting basic needs.
Source: Bay Area Equity Atlas, ”Bay Area Recovery Tracker” interactive dashboard (2022)
Percent of Bay Area Households Reporting Employment Income Loss (L) and Experiencing Food Insecurity (R), Aug. 2020 to Oct. 2 022
THREE KEY TAKEAWAYS
Antidiscrimination and equal opportunity policies alone have not flattened the racial and class disparities present over the past 60 years. Advancing racial equity requires long-term commitment and explicit attention to the legacies of historical injury.
Without equitable recovery efforts, the COVID-19 pandemic threatens to worsen generations-old racial wealth gaps. The pandemic must be a lesson about how future crises (earthquakes, fires, floods) could also exacerbate long-term inequities.
Building equity demands robust data collection and tracking, including the sustainedinputofresidentswho have lived experiences navigating the systems, structures, and institutions we seek to make more equitable.
Explore more data about our region on the Bay Area Equity Atlas at:
http://bayareaequityatlas.org
Questions? Contact me at: ryan@bayareaequityatlas.org
Thank you!
Contra Costa BOS
Budget Retreat 2023
Who We Are
Our Mission
●The Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition advocates for community
engagement in the Contra Costa County budgeting process and for a set of
values-based budgeting principles.
●We educate, advocate and engage with communities across Contra Costa
County on budget issues.
●Our Coalition is composed of 35 local organizations.
Our Members
●350 Contra Costa
●AFSCME Local 2700
●Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment
(ACCE) Contra Costa
●Asian Pacific Environmental Network
●Bay Area Community Services
●Choice in Aging
●Community Clinics Consortium
●Contra Costa Labor Council
●Contra Costa Office of Education
●East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy
●East Contra Costa Community Alliance
●Ensuring Opportunity Campaign
●First 5 Contra Costa/Family Economic Security
Partnership
●Food Bank of Contra Costa
●Great Richmond Interfaith Program
●Healthy Richmond/Local Initiatives Support Corporation
●Human Services Alliance of Contra Costa
●IFPTE Local 21
●League of Women Voters Diablo Valley
●Local Initiatives Support Corporation
●Meals on Wheels Senior Outreach
●Monument Impact
●Multi-Faith Action Coalition
●Planned Parenthood of Northern California
●Racial Justice Coalition of Contra Costa
●Richmond Community Foundation (RCF Connects)
●Richmond LAND
●Rubicon Programs
●Safe Return Project
●SEIU Local 1021
●SURJ Contra Costa
●United Latino Voices
●And many residents of Contra Costa
Dealing with the budget
during uncertain times
The Budget is a moral
document.
A set of values and principles that guide
decision-making. A key to considering how those most
impacted by the budget are affected by our choices.
Given the Economic
Uncertainty…
The County may be faced with some
tough budget decisions.
But we MUST REMEMBER that
low-income people face even greater
challenges, and community needs will
only increase.
Contra Costa County’s
Commitment to Equity
Contra Costa County has committed to addressing
equity in communities across the County. What should
that mean in terms of the budget process?
➔Engage
Identify opportunities to inform and engage the
community at key decision points, in ways that
are equitable and inclusive.
➔Invest
Show our communities you CARE, as expressed
by investment amounts an priorities.
➔Be Bold
Unprecedented times present opportunities in to
explore new concepts and work together in new
ways.
Embed Equity Goals in the
Budget
Measure Assess results
Map Map goals to budget items
Define Spell out equity goals
Prioritize Establish equity priorities
An Opportunity: American Rescue Plan Act
Examples: guaranteed
income pilot, ORESJ
participatory
budgeting, African
American Wellness
Center and others
ARPA provides
maximum
flexibility on how
to spend funds
Workshop to get
community input
on priority
projects
There are $37.5 million dollars left unallocated
Thank You!
Questions?
sara@budgetjusticecc.org
County Administrator’s Office
January 24, 2023
County Budget Development
Key Drivers and Considerations
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Agenda
2
1.County financial updates
2.COVID Cost Recovery
3.Budgeting concerns
4.FY23-24 budget hearings
5.Recommendations
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Bay Area Unemployment Rates
November 2022
The Bay Area’s and County’s unemployment levels have rebounded strongly from the
highs experienced during the COVID pandemic.
Alameda 2.9%
Contra Costa 3.2%
Marin 2.2%
Napa 2.7%
San Francisco 2.1%
San Mateo 2.0%
Santa Clara 2.2%
Solano 3.9%
Sonoma 2.6%
Bay Average 2.6% (3.9% Last Year)
3
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Unemployment Rates 1990-2022
4
6.5
2.9
4.0
11.3%
3.0 3.2
9.2
12.1%
9.0
3.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Contra Costa CA AlamedaSource: CA Employment Development Department
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Labor contracts
Filled Contract
Positions End Date
AFSCME Local 512, Professional and Technical Employees 225 6/30/2026
AFSCME Local 2700, United Clerical, Technical and Specialized Employees 1,425 6/30/2026
California Nurses Association 1,144 9/30/2025
CCC Defenders Association 93 6/30/2022
CCC Deputy District Attorneys’ Association 91 6/30/2026
Deputy Sheriffs Association, Mgmt Unit and Rank and File Unit 794 6/30/2023
Deputy Sheriffs Association, Probation Peace Officers Association 242 6/30/2023
District Attorney Investigator’s Association 26 6/30/2026
IAFF Local 1230 408 6/30/2023
Physicians and Dentists of Contra Costa 289 12/31/2022
Professional & Technical Engineers –Local 21, AFL-CIO 1,168 6/30/2026
Public Employees Union, Local One & FACS Site Supervisor Unit 487 6/30/2026
SEIU Local 1021, Rank and File and Service Line Supervisors Units 861 6/30/2026
Teamsters, Local 856 1,798 6/30/2026
United Chief Officers' Association 17 6/30/2023
Western Council of Engineers 23 6/30/2026
Management Classified & Exempt & Management Project 848 N/A
9,939
5
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Contra Costa County -Assessed Value
Fiscal Years 00/01 -21/22
6
$85B
$256B
11.7%
-7.0%
-3.0%
-0.4%
8.9%
7.8%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
(200)
(150)
(100)
(50)
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
FY00-01 FY05-06 FY10-11 FY15-16 FY20-21Billions
Net Assessed Value Year on Year Change (%)Source: CA BOE
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Property Tax Revenues
Fiscal Years 2006-2022
7
$293M
$263M
$456M
-6.5%
8.1%
4.4%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
-$250M
-$150M
-$50M
$50M
$150M
$250M
$350M
$450M
$550M
2006-07 2011-12 2016-17 2021-22
County County
YOY %Δ
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Property Tax Revenues
Fiscal Years 2006-2022
8
$293M $263M
$456M
$88M $79M
$147M
-6.5%
8.1%
-8.4%
12.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
$(250)
$(150)
$(50)
$50
$150
$250
$350
$450
$550
2006-07 2011-12 2016-17 2021-22
County Fire Protection District County
YOY %Δ
Fire
YOY %Δ
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
General Fund reserves
1.For FY 2021-22, total General Fund revenues were $1.94 billion, and the total
fund balance was $710.2 million, or 36.5% of total General Fund revenue
2.Of the $710.2 million:
a.$389.9 million was unassigned –20.0% of total General Fund Revenues
b.$320.3 million was assigned, committed, restricted or nonspendable
9
7.2%
9.4%
11.0%
13.2%
16.5%17.9%16.6%
20.1%20.5%21.2%20.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Pension funding
County Net Pension
Liability as of 12/31/2021
was $854.6 million, down
from $859.3M the prior
year
CCCERA lowered its
investment earnings
assumption from 7.00% to
6.75% in calendar year
2022
Final Pension Obligation
Bond payment was made
June,2022
10
Actuarial
Valuation
Date
Total CCCERA
Net Liability Funded Ratio County
Net Liability
Fire
Protection
District
Net Liability
2009 $1,024,673 83.8%$727,578 $68,294
2010 1,312,215 80.3%918,919 104,750
2011 1,488,593 78.5%1,037,535 130,737
2012 2,279,059 70.6% 1,591,610 228,950
2013 1,823,681 76.4%1,260,363 180,209
2014 1,469,942 81.7%1,003,749 151,686
2015 1,311,823 84.5%879,610 154,708
2016 1,187,437 86.5%776,396 143,193
2017 1,059,356 88.5%689,426 131,765
2018 1,031,966 89.3%677,735 123,353
2019 947,054 90.6%607,938 132,554
2020 859,345 91.8%557,373 121,270
2021 854,561 92.4%588,842 147,987
Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association
Pension Funding Status (Thousands)
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB)
Trust Pre-funding Status
1.The County established
an OPEB Trust in 2008
and began pre-funding
benefits that same
year
2.The funded ratio is at
49.7% as of the most
recent valuation date
(6/30/2022) and
exceeds the minimum
goal of 44%
11
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Mid-year budget status
12
Mid-Year
22-23
Mid-Year
21-22
Mid-Year
20-21
Mid-Year
19-20
Mid-Year
18-19
ALL FUNDS Budget Actual Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Expenditures $4,706,263,454 $1,882,453,578 40%38%44%41%41%
Revenues $4,415,542,569 $1,850,442,319 42%43%45%39%44%
GENERAL FUND Budget Actual Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Expenditures $2,240,207,659 $913,174,826 41%37%43%41%41%
Revenues $2,056,865,073 $1,013,194,744 49%45%46%37%41%
Wages & Benefits $1,078,093,738 $480,481,668 45%45%45%46%46%
Services & Supplies $811,948,932 $284,697,055 35%35%43%37%39%
Other Charges $339,923,000 $168,717,661 50%33%46%40%44%
Fixed Assets $148,782,110 $19,628,031 13%10%25%24%23%
Inter-departmental Charges ($149,535,121)($40,350,283)27%42%44%41%46%
Contingencies $10,995,000 $694
Total Expenses $2,240,207,659 $913,174,826 41%37%41%41%41%
Taxes $607,400,000 $433,419,918 71%61%62%64%64%
License, Permits, Franchises $12,164,000 $3,433,702 28%28%23%30%32%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $23,943,000 $1,809,946 8%9%5%8%11%
Use of Money & Property $9,578,000 $10,246,234 107%31%42%29%83%
Federal/State Assistance $810,962,073 $410,176,089 51%44%50%28%37%
Charges for Current Services $190,085,000 $78,866,569 41%48%44%32%38%
Other Revenue $402,733,000 $75,242,286 19%20%23%27%23%
Total Revenues $2,056,865,073 $1,013,194,744 49%45%46%37%41%
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Measure X financials
13
Revenue projections through FY22-23
Budget Actuals/Projection
FY20-21 24,078,616$ 27,659,018$
FY21-22 104,000,000$ 117,721,524$
FY22-23 107,000,000$ 120,155,659$
Total 235,078,616$ 265,536,201$
Measure X allocations through FY23-24 with COLA
Reserve 20,000,000$
One-time 136,895,200$
FY22-23 78,150,000$
FY23-24 112,312,500$
347,357,700$
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Contra Costa Fire Protection District
1.District consolidations
a.Annexed East Contra Costa Fire Protection District effective 7/1/22. Service
expansion through the construction of Fire Station 51 (Brentwood) and
construction/staffing of Fire Station 54 (Brentwood).
b.Established fire protection services contract with City of Pinole effective 1/1/23, with
services beginning and Fire Station 74 reopening 3/1/23
2.Fire Station Construction
a.Fire Station 86 (Bay Point) opened in August 2022
b.Fire Stations 9 (Pacheco), 51 (Brentwood), and 54 (Downtown Brentwood) are in the
planning/pre-construction phase
3.CCCFPD Measure X ongoing funding
a.$3.65 million to staff a second unit at Fire Station 81 (downtown Antioch).
b.$3.65 million to staff Fire Station 54 (Downtown Brentwood)
c.Wildland Fire Mitigation and Fuel Reduction –$2.6 million annually for a year-round
hand crew program; $2.1 million annually for Fuels Reduction Projects throughout
high fire hazard zones countywide.
d.$2.1 million to staff an additional fire station in the City of Pinole.
14
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
•Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) is a 164-bed acute care
public hospital owned and operated by the County. It includes 10
geographically dispersed Federally Qualified Health care centers, which
are licensed as outpatient departments of the hospital, and provide over
500,000 physician visits per year.
•CCRMC is financially supported primarily with Fee for Service and Health
Plan Medi-Cal revenues, with the County General Fund subsidizing
approximately 15% of CCRMC’s budget.
•The County General Fund Subsidy has been $73.2 million since FY20-21 and remains
consistent for FY23-24.
•No change in the General Fund Subsidy is anticipated for the next three fiscal years.
•Measure X funding will provide $42 million in annual program support.
•Pandemic costs have been offset with one-time Federal funding such as
CARES, ARPA and FEMA.
15
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
COVID-19 Major Funding Sources
16
Revenue Program Allocation
Coronavirus Relief Fund $227,827,652
ARPA Fiscal Recovery Fund 224,058,903
Emergency Rental Assistance Program 220,174,579
FEMA Public Assistance Program (Estimate)77,964,320
Total $750,025,454
Key Takeaways:
•Four revenue drivers impact vast majority the County’s cost recovery
•Contra Costa receiving significant Federal assistance, including the cities!
•County responsible for pandemic response, including associated costs
•All COVID-19 revenue sources are one-time only funds!
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
COVID-19 FEMA Cost Recovery Update
17
Claim Category Estimate Claimed Obligated Received
Non-Congregate Shelter $32,414,836 $32,414,836 $0 $0
COVID-19 Testing 20,728,141 20,728,141 0 0
Incremental Cleaning 12,688,588 12,688,588 0 0
Great Plates 6,415,043 6,415,043 6,415,043 6,415,043
General Materials (PPE, Other)3,579,956 3,579,956 0 0
Consultant (Ernst & Young)*1,500,000 0 0 0
Vaccination (Fire Mutual Aid)637,756 637,756 0 0
Total $77,964,320 $76,464,320 $6,415,043 $6,415,043
What’s it mean?:
•FEMA reimbursement process cumbersome and could take years before reimbursement is received (typically 24-36 months, but likely longer);
•The County General Fund is advancing the vast majority of the $78 million in FEMA eligible costs until reimbursement is received -this figure has stabilized with all COVID related claims submitted through June 30, 2022;
•ARPA CSLFRF funds eligible to backfill any reduced claim amounts determined by FEMA.
* Consultant costs are claimed at conclusion of cost recovery period established by FEMA
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Significant FEMA Cost Recovery Issue
Non-Congregate Sheltering –“Project Roomkey”
18
FEMA Region IX pursuing a definition
change of “asymptomatic”, requiring that
an “asymptomatic, high risk” individual
receiving NCS shelter services must have
been COVID-19 positive
Proposed change results in close to 90%
of County claimable costs becoming
ineligible -$29 million for Contra Costa
County
What are we doing about it?
•Board Chair sent letter to FEMA
Administrator Criswell on 12/21/22;
•Contra Costa establishing a coalition
of impacted counties to oppose the
change;
•Providing leadership to industry
groups such as CACE, CSAC, NACo
and GFOA about the issue.
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
American Rescue Plan Act Update
19
ARPA -CSLFRF Allocation
Projected Expenditures, thru
6/30/24 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 Total
Funding Sources:$ 112,029,452
$
112,029,452 $0 $224,058,903
Funding Uses:
Health Services (COVID-19)79,214,397 60,000,000 23,000,000 162,214,397
Pandemic Service Relief Payment 0 24,300,111 0 24,300,111
Total Claimed $ 79,214,397 $ 84,300,111 $ 23,000,000 $186,514,508
Fund Balance $ 37,544,395
What’s it mean?:
•Projected FY 2022/23 expenditures are $84.3 million, including $60 million to
HSD and $24.3 million to County departments for PSRP payments;
•Based on current allocations authorized by the Board through June 30, 2024,
$37.5 million remains unallocated.
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
American Rescue Plan Act
Options for Board Consideration
20
The FEMA Non-Congregate Shelter (NCS) definition change issue will likely take
significant time and effort to resolve;
The County’s maximum exposure to NCS claims is $32.4 million and $37.5 million of
ARPA CSLFRF funding remains unallocated;
Based on this information, the Board should consider the following options for
remaining ARPA CSLFRF funds:
•Continue to reserve the remaining $37.5 million of ARPA CSLFRF funding until the
issues around FEMA NCS claims are clarified; or
•Allocate up to $5 million of ARPA CSLFRF funding and continue to reserve
approximately $32.5 million of ARPA CSLFRF funding until the issues around
FEMA NCS claims are clarified;
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Reasons for continuing concern
1.Budgeted expenditures are growing faster than revenues
a.Negotiated employee wage increases of 5% or more over multiple years
b.Persistent high inflation increasing the costs of goods and services
c.State budget deficit
d.Higher interest rates are reducing real estate transactions and associated property
tax revenue growth
e.Workers Compensation Trust Fund
f.General Liability and Insurance Costs
2.Risk of recession and further slowing of the economy
3.Needed capital investments for aging facilities
4.Obsolete Technology
a.Significant needs countywide for new hardware and cybersecurity
b.Finance System replacement in process, and Tax System replacement still needed
5.Increasing costs for County Hospital, Clinics, and Health Plan
21
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
FY23-24 Budget Hearings
1.Hearing dates
1.Recommended Budget –April 25, 2023
2.Budget Adoption –May 23, 2023
2.Format
1.County Administrator –Budget overview
2.Department Presentations
3.Public Comment
4.Board Discussion / Action
22
Board of Supervisors –2023 Retreat
Budget Development -Recommendations
1.ACCEPT report on Budget and Key Issues for FY23-24 and beyond;
2.PROVIDE DIRECTION on a reserve policy for unallocated ARPA CSLFRF
funds pending further information related to the County’s FEMA NCS
claims from options below:
•Continue to reserve the remaining $37.5 million of ARPA CSLFRF
funding until the issues around FEMA NCS claims are clarified;
OR
•Allocate up to $5 million of ARPA CSLFRF funding and continue to
reserve approximately $32.5 million of ARPA CSLFRF funding until
the issues around FEMA NCS claims are clarified.
23
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT report on budget development key drivers and considerations for FY23-24 and beyond.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This report is for informational purposes only. No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the report on County Budget Development - Key Drivers and Considerations.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 01/24/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Adam Nguyen, County Finance Director (925)
665-2048
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 24, 2023
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.2
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:January 24, 2023
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Budget and Key Issues for FY23-24 and beyond
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Public comments: John, Mariana, Roxanne, Dan, Caller 6770, Jan, Liz, Rachel, Ruth.
ATTACHMENTS
CAO Budget Development presentation
Budget Justice Coalition Presentation
Bay Area Equity Atlas Presentation
Board of Supervisors
Annual Retreat 2023
January 24, 2023 1
Agenda•Major Projects completed 2022
•Mod M/C mental health and ADA upgrades
•20 Year Capital Facilities Master Plan (CFMP)
•Major Projects continuing 2023
•ADR Project
•WRTH Project
•CFMP first 5 year Implementation Plan
•Changes to Surplus Lands Act
2
Major Projects Completed in 2022
3
Modules M and C in Martinez Detention Facility
Module M
•5 Mental Health Beds
•24 Special Services Beds
Module C
•Complete plumbing retro fit
•Create 4 ADA compliant cells/1 ADA compliant shower
Module M
before/during
4
Module M
Now
5
20 Year Capital Facilities Master Plan (CFMP)
6
Highlights
•Complete Facilities Condition Assessment of 273 facilities and 3.75 million
Gross Square Feet (GSF)
•20 Year plan and forecast of both rehabilitation and new construction needed
•Plan for 4 new centralized locations for service hubs across the county
•Consolidation into new hubs will allow for potential housing opportunities
Major Projects Underway in 2023
7
Administration Demolition and Redevelopment (ADR)
•Demolition of 651 Pine Street complex –Completed
•3 Story County Building -parking on ground floor with 2 floors office above
•Public plaza area
•City of Martinez will vacate Pine Street between Main and Escobar
•Expected occupancy April 2024
West County Reentry, Treatment and Housing Facility (WRTH)
•288 general population beds –96 of which are medical/mental health treatment beds
•Full medical clinic in the facility
•Expected occupancy January 2025
ADR demo in 2022
8
Major Projects Update
9
West County Reentry, Treatment and Housing (WRTH)
•Project underway
•Begin construction by May, 2023
•Project completion expected January, 2025
5-Year Implementation Overview
The first five years will be focused on creating a new East County Service Center,
densifying existing facilities for anticipated headcount growth, and renovating buildings
in the worst condition. 17% of the County’s capital expenses will be incurred between
Years 1-5.
10
Key Actions
» Construct new East County Service Center (est $60 million)
» Construct central County storage facility at Waterbird complex (est $10 million)
»Initiate FCI-related improvements to facilities with FCI scores of 0.5+.
» Begin tenant improvements to existing facilities that will be maintained in the portfolio
for 20+ years, since most facilities haven’t undergone recent improvements.
» Refresh existing facilities that will be disposed in 6-20 years.
Historically we have budgeted approximately $15 million per year for the last three items
Capital Budget Fiscal Year (FY) 23-24
11
•Capital requests from Departments
•Evaluated and prioritized against long term planning in CFMP•Total requested amount to be determined once requests are received later in budget development •Capital spending from CFMP
•Targeted towards facilities to be retained in CFMP•Targeted toward facilities with poor facilities condition scores•Historical amount approximately $15 million annually•Planning and development for new construction from CFMP
•Due diligence/initial site planning for East County Service Hub site
•Suitability analysis for Delta Fair, Antioch & Technology Way, Brentwood alternatives•Site search/acquisition for West County Service Hub•Estimate $1.5 million for this work this Fiscal Year
Surplus Lands
Act
AB1486 key
changes
•The California Surplus Lands Act requires local agencies
disposing of surplus land to prioritize affordable
housing, open space and school use. The State’s
oversight body is the Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD).
•Prior to taking any action to dispose of County land, the
Board must declare, based on written findings, the land
to be “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land.”
•If land is declared “exempt surplus land,” the County
must send HCD a copy of the written determination at
least 30 days before disposing of the land (per HCD
guidelines).
•If land is declared “surplus land,” the County must send
a “notice of availability” to HCD, as well as specified
public agencies and nonprofits, giving recipients 60 days
to respond with their interest.
12
Surplus Lands
Act
AB1486 key
changes
•If any interest expressed, the County must engage in
good faith negotiations for not less than 90 days.
•In the selection process, priority is to be given to
affordable housing development and the number of
affordable units.
•A post negotiation report must be sent to HCD.
•Deed restriction required on sale, if 10 plus units
developed 15% must be affordable
•Penalties if improper disposal-30% purchase price 1st
time, 50% thereafter –60 day cure and correct period
13
Questions
14
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT report on Capital Projects.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact. The report is for information
only.
BACKGROUND:
See attached report.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 01/24/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Eric Angstadt; 925-655-2042
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 24, 2023
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.3
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:January 24, 2023
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Capitol Projects Report
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
No comments.
ATTACHMENTS
Capital Projects Updates Presentation
Anna Roth, CEO
Contra Costa Health
January 24, 2023
Contra Costa County
Board of Supervisors
2023 Annual Retreat
2023 will be a year of sweeping
change in health care
Reforms in both payment and care
delivery models will transform
almost every aspect of our system
Our uniquely integrated system is
well positioned to navigate the
challenges ahead
3
2023
PRIORITY
AREAS OF
FOCUS
•COVID Transition
•California Advancing and
Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM)
•Single Plan Model (Medi-Cal)
•Health Delivery System
•Housing/Homelessness
•Equity
4
COVID
TRANSITION
Embed COVID response into
day -to -day operations of
Contra Costa Health
5
COVID TRANSITION
Opportunities Challenges
•Integrate lessons learned and
transition plan into daily
operations
•Laser focus on equity
•Partner with all health
systems to ensure ongoing
access
•Continued unpredictability -
new variants, surges in
disease
•Maintain infrastructure and
needed response as funding
decreases
6
California
Advancing
andInnovating
Medi-Cal
(CalAIM)
The transformation of our health
system to be more responsive,
equitable and outcome focused
by matching the right patients to
the right services at the right
time
7
CalAIM
Opportunities Challenges
•Expands Medi-Cal scope of services
•Addresses and integrates social needs, behavioral
health and physical health
•Focused on those with the most complex needs
o People with Medicare/Medi-Cal
o Justice-involved
o Behavioral health
o Foster youth
o Medically complex
o Elders/long-term care
o Unhoused
•Requires significant transformation
•Managed care
•Delivery system
•Care coordination
•Payment structures
•Involves entire health system as well as social
services
•Workforce
•Transferring financial risk to local plan
•IT infrastructure
8
CCHP-
Single Plan
Model for
Medi-Cal
Managed Care
Contra Costa County will
transition from a Medi-Cal two
plan model to a single plan model
working with those most
vulnerable in the community
9
SINGLE PLAN MODEL
Opportunities Challenges
•Only County that owns and operates a Local
Initiative Medi-Cal Health Plan
•CCHP will be the county’s
primary/single Medi-Cal provider as of January
2024
•Expansion of members and services –approx.
240 K and anticipated growth in 2024
•Managed care for all Medi-Cal members
•Behavioral Health has always been a single
plan model
•Highly regulated, rigid operational
environment
•Expansion requires broader network and
stronger infrastructure
o Providers including long term care
o Auxiliary workforce expansion
o Recruitment & retention
o Population health management and
accountability
10
DELIVERY
SYSTEM
Provide high quality, equitable,
accessible, comprehensive and
timely health care
11
DELIVERY SYSTEM
Opportunities Challenges
•Integration of behavioral health and
physical health care
•Telehealth expansion
•Capital projects –CCRMC and BH and
Housing and Detention
•Expansion of providers –CBOs, other
health systems, social services
•Continuum -prevention,
outpatient/inpatient, re-entry into the
community
•Workforce
•Transforming infrastructure
•Ensuring sustainability
•Because of highly integrated and
contracted nature of our system,
difficult to understand county
involvement (accountable for all care
provided)
12
HOUSING AND
HOMELESS
SERVICES
Work across the region to ensure
our growing homeless
populations have the
services,support and
opportunities needed to thrive
and secure stable housing
13
Homeless Services
Opportunities Challenges
•Convene government partners
across the region to align
strategies, policies and funding
•Multi-sector call to action
•Increased revenue
•Services –CARE Court, CORE,
street medicine and clinics
•Disproportionate growth in the
East Bay
•Disconnected funding and
planning
•Complex network, funding &
policies
•Affordability
14
EQUITY
Without equity, there can
be no sustainable health
Embed equity in everything we
do, every program we launch &
every interaction we have with
our community and partners
15
EQUITY
Opportunities Challenges
•Support the Office for Racial
Equity and Social Justice
•A3
•PRIDE initiative
•Women's health
•Historical discrimination of
groups and now focus
•Massive, complex & broad
•Lack of common
nomenclature
•Nascent infrastructure
•No agreed upon metrics
16
•Central themes across our 2023
priorities
•Equity
•Quality
•Integration
•We will advance equity, improve
health outcomes and enhance
quality of life
17
Discussion
•Anna Roth,Contra Costa Health CEO
•Lavonna Martin, Deputy Health Director
•Sharron Mackey, CCHP CEO
•Suzanne Tavano, Behavioral Health Director
•Samir Shah, CCRMC CEO
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT report from the Health Services Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact. The report is for informational purposes only.
BACKGROUND:
See attached report.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 01/24/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Adam Nguyen, County Finance Director (925)
665-2047
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 24, 2023
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:January 24, 2023
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Health Services update
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Public comment: Caller 6770
ATTACHMENTS
Health Services Department updates
D.9
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the .Board
Adopted this Resolution on 09/24/2019 by the following vote:
AYE:
John Gioia
Candace Andersen EJ Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO: [[]
ABSENT: [LJ
ABSTAIN:[Lj
RECUSE: [ZJ
~~·.,,
::. -. ·.:-l ~ .-::;
' ,.,, · .. ''"" .: .. ,, ...... -/
Resolution No. 2019/500
IN THE MATTER OF UPDATING THE RULES OF PROCEDURES FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETINGS TO
PERMIT EARLIER ELECTION OF NEW YEAR OFFICERS
WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors, each calendar year, reorganizes, electing a chairperson and vice chairperson, approving
committee assignments, and defining its goals for the next 12 months; and
WHEREAS, the annual reorganization requires many weeks of advance planning; and
WHEREAS, the early selection of officers of the Board of Supervisors would facilitate a seamless transition of leadership at the
time of reorganization; and '
WHEREAS it has at times been necessary for a board member to participate in a board meeting from a remote location; and
WHEREAS certain rules of conduct are necessary to preserve the orderly conduct of board meetings;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Rule 3 of the Rules of Procedures for Board . of Supervisors Meetings is hereby modified to read, "The Organization
Meeting of the Board shall be held on its first regular meeting in January of each year, at which time the new year chair
and vice chair will assume their offic(!s."
2. Rule 6.2 of the Rules of Procedures for Board of Supervisors Meetings is hereby modified to read, "The election of officers
of the Board of Supervisors shall occur on or about the last meeting in September for the ensuing year beginning on
January 1. Officers shall serve until December 31 or until the selection of their successors, whichever occurs later." Rule
6.3 is deleted and Rule 6.4 is renumbered to 6.3.
3. New Rule 14 regarding Participation of Supervisors by Teleconference is added.
4. Old Rule 14 is renumbered to Rule 15 -Disruption of Meeting. Rule 15 is hereby modified to read, "For the purpose of
insuring the orderly conduct of the Board of Supervisors meeting, no whistles, horns, drums, noise makers, megaphones,
air horns, bullhorns, or other amplified devices are allowed inside the County Administration Building while the meeting is
in session. If any meeting is willfully interrupted by a group or groups of persons so that the orderly conduct . of the meeting
becomes infeasible and order cannot be restored by the removal of individuals who are willfully interrupting the meeting,
the Chair may order the meeting room cleared, as authorized by law (Gov. Code,§ 54957.9), recess the meeting, adjourn
the meeting."
5. The updated Rules of Procedures for Board of Supervisors Meetings is adopted as in Attachment A.
6. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 2019/81 adopted on March 12, 2019.
Contact: Supervisor John Gioia (510)
231-8686
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date
shown.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
RULES OF PROCEDURES FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETINGS
POLICY
It is the policy of the Board of Supervisors to hold public meetings in accordance with
the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act and all other applicable governing legislation. The
Board strives to govern and work together in an effective, efficient, ethical and courteous manner in
the highest tradition of public service and in the best interests of the County of Contra Costa and its
residents. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 2015/55.
PROCEDURE
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Rule 1. Applicability of Rules
1.1 These Rules of Procedure (“Rules”) are adopted pursuant to Government Code
Section 25003. The rules apply to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa
whether sitting as the Board of Supervisors of the County or as the governing body of any other
district, authority, or board.
1.2 The Rules are deemed to be procedural only. Except as otherwise provided by law,
the failure to strictly observe application of the Rules shall not affect the jurisdiction of the Board
or invalidate any action taken at a meeting that is otherwise held in conformity with law.
1.3 Except as otherwise provided by law, these Rules, or any one of them, may
be suspended by order of the Chair and will be deemed suspended by actions taken by or
with the consent of the Chair or a majority of the Board members.
Rule 2. Definitions
2.1 “Board” means the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa,
whether sitting as the Board of Supervisors of the County or as the governing body of any
other district, authority or board;
2.2 “Chair” and “Vice Chair” mean the Board members elected to those respective
offices. “Chair” also means the presiding officer acting in the absence of the elected Chair.
2.3 “Clerk” means the Clerk of the Board or a Deputy Clerk of the Board;
2.4 “County Counsel” means the Board’s attorney, appointed pursuant to Ordinance
Code section 24-12.002.
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
MEETINGS
Rule 3. Organization Meeting
The Organization Meeting of the Board shall be held on its first regular meeting in January of each
year, at which time the new year chair and vice chair will assume their offices.
Rule 4. Regular Meetings
4.1 All regular meetings shall be held by the Board, in all its capacities, in its chambers
in the Contra Costa County Administration Building, at 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California.
Regular meetings shall commence at 9:00 a.m., or as otherwise prescribed by the Chair. Regular
meetings generally shall be held on every Tuesday of the month. However, the Board of
Supervisors shall not be required to hold a regular meeting (1) on any Tuesday that is the fifth
Tuesday of a calendar month,
(2) on any Tuesday following a Monday holiday; (3) that is canceled pursuant to the annual
calendar adopted by the Board or (4) that is canceled by the Chair when no quorum is expected to
be present.
4.2 Holidays, fifth Tuesdays, and periodic breaks, which result in a canceled meeting,
will be determined by the Board and posted annually.
Rule 5. Absence of a Quorum, Adjournment
5.1 In the absence of a quorum, the remaining members or (if no member is present)
the Clerk may adjourn the meeting to another date and time in accordance with Government
Code Section 54955 and shall post a Notice of Adjournment.
5.2 In the event a Supervisor leaves the hearing room, momentarily causing a lack
of quorum, he or she should notify the Chair of his or her intended absence, and the Chair may
call a recess.
ELECTION, POWERS AND DUTIES OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
Rule 6. Annual Selection of Chair and Vice Chair, and Committee Assignments
6.1 On or before December 1 of each year, on a form provided by the Clerk of the
Board, each Board member will submit to the Clerk of the Board their individual preference for
appointment to committees, boards and commissions. During the month of December, the Clerk
of the Board will ask the Board to acknowledge receipt of the preference forms as a Board
action item on a public agenda.
6.2 The election of officers of the Board of Supervisors shall occur on or about the last
meeting in September for the ensuing year beginning on January 1. Officers shall serve until
December 31 or until the selection of their successors, whichever occurs later."
3
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
6.3 At its Organization Meeting, or thereafter, the incoming/new Chair of the Board will
submit for approval by the full Board, the Chair’s final recommendations for Board assignments to
the local, regional and statewide committees, boards and commissions, in accordance with the
Board’s March 21, 2000 policy on Board Member Committee Assignments, as may be amended
from time to time.
Rule 7. Powers and Duties of Chair
The Chair shall serve as presiding officer of the Board, rule on questions of procedure,
nominate for Board approval representatives to Board committees whose appointment is not
otherwise provided for, sign resolutions, ordinances, contracts, leases and other official documents
approved by the Board, preserve order and decorum, and decide all questions of order. The Chair
may consult with County Counsel in making such rulings. Decisions of the Chair may be
overruled by a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors.
Rule 8. Powers and Duties of the Vice-Chair
The Vice-Chair shall have and exercise all powers and duties of the Chair at the meetings at
which the Chair is absent.
Rule 9. Selection of a Chair Pro Tempore
If neither the Chair nor the Vice-Chair is present at a Board meeting, the Board members
present shall select one of their members to act as the Chair Pro Tempore. The Chair Pro Tempore
shall have and exercise all the powers and duties of the Chair for that particular meeting only.
ORDER AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Rule 10. Order of Business
The order of business at each regular meeting, except for such times as may be set apart for
consideration of special items (or as otherwise prescribed by the Chair), shall be as follows:
10.1 Call to Order. The presiding officer initiates the proceedings by bringing the meeting
to order.
10.2 Roll Call. The Clerk calls the roll and records by name all members present
or absent. During the course of the meeting the Clerk records the arrival of any member
listed as absent and the departure of any member listed as present.
10.3 Inspirational Thought. The Board hears an inspirational thought as set forth on the
agenda.
10.4 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. The Chair
designates a person to lead those present in reciting the Pledge.
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
10.5 Agenda Review. The Chair inquires whether Board members or the County
Administrator wish to make any agenda revisions or request any items to be continued or removed
from the Consent agenda.
10.6 Added Items. The Board may take action on items of business not appearing on the
posted agenda under any of the following circumstances:
10.6.1 Upon a determination by a majority vote that an emergency situation exists,
as defined in Government Code Section 54956.5;
10.6.2 Upon a determination by a two-thirds vote, or, if fewer than two-thirds of the
members are present, by unanimous vote of those members present, that there is a need to
take immediate action and that the need for action came to the attention of the County
subsequent to the agenda being posted;
10.6.3 The item was posted for a prior meeting of the Board occurring not more than
five calendar days prior to the date action is taken on the item, and at the prior meeting the
item was continued to the meeting at which action is being taken.
10.7 Consent Agenda Items. Consent agenda items are routine in nature and do not require
individual consideration. All consent items are approved by a single vote as recommended without
discussion unless an item is removed and continued or considered during the regular agenda for
separate action at the request of a Board member, staff member, or a member of the public.
10.8 Presentations. Each presentation will last no more than five minutes, unless this time
is extended by the Chair. A maximum of three presentations may be scheduled at each meeting
except that the Chair may authorize an additional presentation(s). The subject of the presentations
should be of countywide interest and significance.
10.9 Public Comment. Public Comment is that period of time set aside for members of the
public to address the Board on items of County business not listed on the agenda (“off-agenda”). The
Public Comment item shall be deemed to constitute the opportunity for members of the public to
address the Board in compliance with Government Code Section 54954.3. See Rule 11.1 and 11.2.
10.10 Discussion Items. Discussion items include items previously removed from the
consent calendar.
10.11 Closed Session. Closed session discussion items are intended to be heard at the
specified time(s) but may be heard earlier or later, in the discretion of the Chair.
10.12 Adjournment. Any Board member may request that the meeting be adjourned in
5
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
memory of a recently deceased person.
Rule 11. Conduct of Meetings
11.1 Addressing the Board—General
11.1.1 Before the meeting, or during the meeting before the agenda item to be
addressed, a person wishing to address the Board should fill out a yellow speaker card
and deposit it in the box near the podium.
11.1.2 When called upon, the person should come to the podium, state his or her
name for the record, and, if speaking for an organization or other group, identify the
organization or group represented.
11.1.3 All remarks should be addressed to the Board as a whole, not to
individual members, to the staff, or to the audience. Each person speaking from the
floor shall obtain permission from the Chair.
11.1.4 Questions, if any, should be addressed to the Chair, who will
determine whether or by whom an answer will be provided.
11.1.5 Each speaker will have three minutes. This time may be extended or
reduced, in the discretion of the Chair.
11.1.6 All speakers, especially those who anticipate making oral presentations or
comments exceeding three minutes, are encouraged to submit comments in writing, in
advance, to the Clerk for distribution to the Board and other interested parties at the earliest
feasible time before the meeting, but no later than 8:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting.
Written comments may be submitted either by mail or via email:
clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us. The Board requests that a person providing written
materials to the Board during a meeting submit an original and 10 copies. Such written
comments will be distributed to members of the Board and staff.
11.1.7 In order to maintain a public meeting environment conducive to receiving
public testimony from all sides of any issue, it is the Board’s policy that the audience will
be discouraged from engaging in audible or emotional displays of support or opposition
to testimony provided. Behavior such as clapping, booing, hissing, and cheering can
create an intimidating environment for people interested in giving public testimony and
can unnecessarily lengthen Board meetings. Consequently, such behavior is discouraged.
11.1.8 Speakers should not present the same or substantially the same items or
argument to the Board as presented by earlier speakers, or be profane in presenting their
oral comments.
11.1.9 In order to expedite matters and to avoid repetitious presentations,
6
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
whenever any group of persons wishes to address the Board on the same subject matter,
the Chair may request that a spokesperson be chosen by the group to comment on its behalf.
11.1.10 To minimize distractions during public meetings, all personal
communication devices, such as mobile phones and pagers, will be turned off or put in a
non-audible mode during Board meetings.
11.1.11 Any of the foregoing rules may be waived by the Chair or by a
majority vote of the Board members present when it is deemed that there is good cause to
do so, based upon the particular facts and circumstances involved.
11.1.12 The rules set forth above are not exclusive and do not limit the
inherent power and general legal authority of the Board, or of its presiding officer, to govern
the conduct of Board meetings as may be considered appropriate from time to time or in
particular circumstances for purposes of orderly and effective conduct of the affairs of the
County.
11.2 Addressing the Board—Public Comment
Comments under Public Comment are limited to subjects within the subject matter jurisdiction of
the County but not on the agenda. Such comments are limited to no more than three minutes per
speaker. If numerous persons wish to make comments, the Chair may limit the Public Comment
period to a specific amount of time, e.g. 30 minutes total for all speakers, and/or may reduce the
time limit per speaker, e.g. 2 minutes per speaker. Speakers are encouraged to submit written
comments, either by mail or via email: clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us.
Written comments must be received by the Clerk of the Board before 8:00 a.m. on the day of the
meeting in order to be considered at the meeting.
11.3 Addressing the Board—Items Removed from Consent Calendar
Members of the public addressing the Board in connection with more than one item that has been
removed from consent calendar at a single meeting are limited to a cumulative total of not to
exceed 12 minutes for all of their oral presentations at such meeting, unless otherwise allowed by
the Chair. The purpose of this provision is to ensure that all members of the public who wish to
speak during a meeting have an opportunity to do so and to permit the effective and orderly
conduct of the County’s business.
11.4 Addressing the Board―Public Hearings
11.4.1 Any member of the public wishing to address the Board orally on a public
hearing on the Board agenda may do so before or during the hearing, or as otherwise
specified by the Chair.
11.4.2 Any person desiring to have a hearing transcribed by a stenographic
7
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
reporter at his or her own expense may do so, provided that he or she consults the Clerk to
arrange facilities for such reporting prior to commencement of the hearing and advises the
Clerk of the full name, business address, and telephone number of the reporter being used.
11.5 Use of Acronyms
The Board discourages the use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its
meetings and written materials.
Rule 12. Public Hearings for Planning and Zoning Matters―(Land Use Matters)
12.1 Order of Procedure
Unless the Chair in his or her discretion directs otherwise, the order for presentation of
testimony on particular land use items shall be as follows:
12.1.1 Presentation by staff.
12.1.2 Documents. The Chair acknowledges receipt of any documents offered
as evidence and filed with the Clerk before the hearing.
12.1.3 First Presentation. If the item is presented for Board approval (e.g., rezoning,
development plan), the first presentation is by the project applicant, followed by public
testimony. If the item is an appeal from a decision of a lower body (e.g., subdivision, land
use permit), the first presentation is by the appellant, followed by the presentation by the
project applicant. This presentation (or each presentation, if the item is an appeal) shall not
exceed 10 minutes or the approximate length of the staff presentation, whichever is greater.
12.1.4 Public testimony. Each speaker shall have no more than three minutes.
12.1.5 Rebuttal. A rebuttal not exceeding five minutes may be made by the
person making the first presentation.
12.1.6 Closing comments by staff.
12.1.7 Board discussion and decision.
12.2 Conduct of Hearings
12.2.1 Witnesses’ Testimony. Witnesses will not be sworn.
12.2.2 Rules of Evidence. The hearing will not be conducted according to
technical judicial rules of evidence. Any relevant evidence may be considered if it
is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
conduct of serious affairs. The Chair may exclude irrelevant or redundant
testimony and may make such other rulings as may be necessary for the orderly
conduct of the proceedings ensuring basic fairness and a full airing of the issues
involved.
12.3 Exhibits.
12.3.1 Subject to paragraph 12.3.2, all exhibits, including documentary
materials such as photographs, drawings, maps, charts, letters, petitions and
other physical evidence, presented at a land use hearing shall be retained in the
Board of Supervisors files as part of the record of the hearing.
12.3.2 Any staff exhibit (e.g., a general plan or area map) that has been or
will be used in other land use hearings will be preserved by the Community
Development Department for future reference. A notation indicating its location
shall be made in the case file in any matter in which it has been used.
12.4 Questioning of Speakers and Staff.
Any person desiring to direct a question to a speaker or staff member shall submit the
question to the Chair, who shall determine whether the question is relevant to the
subject of the hearing and whether or not it need be answered by the speaker or staff
member.
12.5 Overriding Fairness. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 12.1, the Board is
committed to provide an applicant, appellant, or other person or entity with a substantial,
direct property interest in an item, a full and fair hearing, based on the facts and
circumstances of the particular matter, the nature and complexity of the particular issue, the
number of persons wishing to be heard, and similar due process considerations. Toward
this end, the Chair, in his or her discretion, may extend the time limits set forth in
paragraph 12.1 and consider other procedural mechanisms.
12.6 Absent From Hearing. A Supervisor who was absent from all or part of a hearing
may vote on the matter if the Supervisor states for the record that he or she has reviewed all
evidence received during the absence and also states that he or she has either: (1) listened to
the Clerk’s recording, (2) watched the video, or (3) read a complete transcript of the
proceedings that occurred during his or her absence.
9
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
Rule 13. Nuisance Abatement Hearings
A hearing on an appeal from the County Abatement Officer’s Notice and Order to Abate shall be
held in accordance with the provisions of County Ordinance Code section 14-6.418, as well as with
these Procedures. In the event of a conflict, the provisions of County Ordinance Code section 14-
6.418 shall prevail.
Rule 14. Rules for Participating by Teleconference
The Brown Act permits members of the Board of Supervisors to participate in Board meetings by
teleconference, but only when certain legal requirements are met. (Gov. Code, § 53953 (b).) If these
requirements are not met, then the Supervisor calling in cannot be counted as part of the quorum for the
meeting, can only listen to the meeting, and cannot discuss any item or vote.
If a Supervisor wishes to be able to discuss items and vote by telephone, then, in addition to the usual
agenda posting requirements, the following must occur in advance of the meeting:
14.1. Quorum Required. The County Administrator must ensure that during the teleconference
meeting, at least a quorum of the Board will participate from locations in the County.
14.2 Agenda Requirement - All Locations Must be Listed. Each telephone conference location and
the meeting location must be shown on the agenda for the meeting. In addition, the agenda must
provide an opportunity for members of the public to give public comment from each teleconference
location. So, for example, if a Supervisor is participating at a Board Committee from his or her
District Office, then the location for the meeting shown on the agenda would be, for example: 651
Pine Street Room 101, Martinez, CA, AND the address of the Supervisor's District Office. The
Supervisor's Office would be considered a meeting location, and the public would be entitled to
attend the meeting at that location. See Item 14.4 below.
14.3 Agenda Requirement - Posting. In addition to the usual posting agenda locations and County
website, an agenda will be posted at each teleconference location 96 hours in advance of the meeting.
The Supervisor participating from his/her District office shall post the Agenda at his/her office 96
hours in advance of the Board meeting.
14.4 Public Participation at Remote Location. Each teleconference location must be open and
accessible to members of the public. Thus, if a Supervisor’s District Office is a teleconference
location, it must be open to the public during the meeting. The Supervisor would need to have a
speaker phone so that members of the public would be able to hear the meeting and address the Board
directly by speaker phone from his/her office.
14.5 Roll Call Vote. All votes taken during a teleconference meeting must be by roll call.
Rule 15. Disruption of Meeting
For the purpose of insuring the orderly conduct of the Board of Supervisors meeting, no whistles,
horns, drums, noise makers, megaphones, air horns, bullhorns, or other amplified devices are
allowed inside the County Administration Building while the meeting is in session. If any meeting
is willfully interrupted by a group or groups of persons so that the orderly conduct of the meeting
10
RESOLUTION NO. 2019/500
becomes infeasible and order cannot be restored by the removal of individuals who are willfully
interrupting the meeting, the Chair may order the meeting room cleared, as authorized by law
(Gov. Code, § 54957.9), recess the meeting, or adjourn the meeting
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Discuss potential updates to Board Operating Procedures.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
See attached County Policy and Operating Procedures.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 01/24/2023 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Ken Carlson, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Adam Nguyen, County Finance Director (925)
665-2047
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: January 24, 2023
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:January 24, 2023
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Policy and Procedures for meetings
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Public comments: John, Caller 6770.
ATTACHMENTS
BOS Policy and Procedures
Resolution No. 2019-500