HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12062022 - Completed Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD
BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229
KAREN MITCHOFF, CHAIR, 4TH DISTRICT
FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT
JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT
CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT
DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT
MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075
PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON
THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES.
A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR.
The Board meeting will be accessible in-person, via television, and via live-streaming to all members of the public.
Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27, ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32, and can be
seen live online at www.contracosta.ca.gov.
Persons who wish to address the board during public comment or with respect to an item on the agenda may comment in
person or may call in during the meeting by dialing 888-278-0254 followed by the access code 843298#. A caller should
indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item, by pushing "#2" on their phone. Access via Zoom is also available using the
following link: https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/87344719204 . Those participating via Zoom should indicate they wish to speak on
an agenda item by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. To provide contact information, please contact Clerk of
the Board at clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us or call 925-655-2000.
Meetings of the Board are closed-captioned in real time. Public comment generally will be limited to two minutes. Your
patience is appreciated. A Spanish language interpreter is available to assist Spanish-speaking callers.
A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair.
Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible online at www.contracosta.ca.gov.
ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES
December 6, 2022
9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies.
Closed Session
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6)
1. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino.
Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.;
SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters
I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers
Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech.
Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856.
2. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino.
Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees.
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (Gov. Code, § 54957)
Title: County Counsel
Inspirational Thought- "When our identity comes from the self, we keep our energy to ourselves. We feel energetic, we feel
powerful, and we experience youthful vigor." ~Deepak Chopra, author
Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis,
District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Thomas Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel
CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.56 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to
removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be
considered with the Discussion Items.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
D.1 RECEIVE report from the Department of Conservation and Development on the Draft Housing Element of the
County General Plan, ACCEPT public comments, and PROVIDE direction to staff. (Maureen Toms, Department of
Conservation and Development)
Speakers: No name given; Hanna, Partnership for the Bay's Future.
Staff noted the draft contains a clerical error in the zoning listed for the Mauzy School in Alamo, which will
be corrected before submission to the state.
RECEIVED the report; ACCEPTED public comment; and DIRECTED staff to ensure that expedition of
our response occurs and upon the first response from HCD the county adopt the housing element and
incorporating responses as appropriate.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.2 CONSIDER introducing Ordinance No. 2022-28, allowing the sale and delivery of non-flavored cannabis
vaping products, waive reading, and fix December 13, 2022, for adoption, and directing Contra Costa Health
Services to consult with stakeholders to develop a proposed program designed to raise awareness about the dangers
of youth cannabis vaping and curtail the illegal market, and return to the Board of Supervisors with a recommended
program. (Supervisor Burgis)
Speakers: Larry A. Bernard, M.D.; John Gomez, UFCW 5; Olivia T. Lazo; Garrison Hashine; Jim
Araby, UFCW; Boston McGee; Stephanie Uy, NORML; Pablo Coronel; Renee Lee, Rossmoor
Compassion Society; Nattali Lahdaa, Contra Costa NORML; Steven Chow, Shryne Group; Amaya;
Jacqueline, West Contra Costa Alcohol Policy Coalition; No Name Given; Sean Kiernan; Dr. Lynn
Silver, Senior Advisor, Public Health Institute U.C.S.F.; Pablo Gorman; Dale Geringer, Director
California NORML; Joe Fillborehoff, Sacramento Commissioner; Mike McDermott; Michelle Swett,
Austin Legal Group; Shamika Bowles, Youth Advocating Change Halting Tobacco; Zoe Schreiber,
California Cannabis Industry Association, Garden of Eden Dispensaries and Alameda County and
farms; William; Laura Fogelman; Sara Armstrong, Americans for Safe Access; Jimmy, Contra Costa
Tobacco Coalition; Edgar Martinez, Antioch; Greg Kremenly.
AYE: District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen
Mitchoff
NO: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.3 RECEIVE monthly update on the activities and oversight of the County's Head Start Program (Marla Stuart,
Employment and Human Services Director)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.4 HEARING to consider adopting Ordinance 2022-37, authorizing the establishment of child care centers that
have obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses in residential, recreation, office,
agricultural, business, and commercial zoning districts with the issuance of a land use permit. (Aruna Bhat and
Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.5 CONSIDER accepting the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee (LMHAC) 2022/23 Interim Grant
Program Plan; approving and authorizing the Health Services Director, or designee, to allocate up to $500,000 in
grants to identified community-based organizations providing health related programs for residents of the Los
Medanos Health Area; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue grant awards payments
totaling up to $90,000 for immediate allocation to the identified programs providing essential services or a holiday
event in December 2022. (Shanelle Preston, LMHAC Chair, and Ernesto De La Torre, LMHAC staff)
Speakers: Ray, Executive Director, Healthy Arch Institute; Willy, Youth County AECP.
The presentation slides were not available at the time of publication of the agenda. They are adopted into
the record by unanimous vote of the Board.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D. 6 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.
There were no consent items removed for discussion.
D. 7 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)
There were no requests to speak at public comment.
Written commentary was provided by Maureen Brennan regarding our climate emergency, stating there is
no need for 2 additional drilling sites as proposed by Bob Nunn, and noting there are approximately 120
capped drilling sites in Contra Costa. (Attached).
D. 8 CONSIDER reports of Board members.
There were no items reported today.
ADJOURN in memory of
Bob Delevati
Former Assistant County Registrar
Adjourned today's meeting at 1:40 p.m.
CONSENT ITEMS
Road and Transportation
C. 1 ACCEPT the County’s Development Impact Fee Annual Report for fiscal year 2021/2022 for the Area of
Benefit program in unincorporated Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Public Works Director,
Countywide. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 2 ACCEPT the County’s North Richmond Area of Benefit Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report
for fiscal years 2017/2018 through 2021/2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, North Richmond
area. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 3 ACCEPT the County’s South County Area of Benefit Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report for
fiscal years 2017/2018 through 2021/2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, South County area. (No
fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 4 AWARD and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a construction contract in the
amount of $2,760,070 with Ghilotti Bros., Inc., for the Danville Boulevard-Orchard Court Complete Streets
Improvement Project, Alamo area. (19% Measure J Regional Funds, 37% Highway Safety Improvement Grant
Funds, and 44% Local Road Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Engineering Services
C. 5 APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Dougherty Valley Maintenance County Service Area M-29 budget
totaling $27,502,372, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100%
County Service Area M-29 Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/405 accepting for recording purposes only an Offer of Dedication for Roadway
Purposes for minor subdivision MS20-00002, for a project being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as
recommended by the Public Works Director, Brentwood area. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/407 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor
subdivision MS20-00002, for a project being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as recommended by the
Public Works Director, Brentwood area. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Special Districts & County Airports
C. 8 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, a contract
amendment with Psomas to extend the term through December 31, 2023, for on-call geographic information system
technical support services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 9 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute an amendment to the agreement with the
California Department of Water Resources: Flood Emergency Response Projects Grant Program — Statewide, to
extend the term through April 29, 2024, with no change in the grant amount, Concord, Danville, Martinez, Pacheco,
Pinole, Pleasant Hill, Rodeo, San Pablo, Richmond, and Walnut Creek areas. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Claims, Collections & Litigation
C.10 DENY claim filed by THC - Orange County, LLC (dba Kindred Hospital San Francisco Bay Area).
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Appointments & Resignations
C.11 DECLARE a vacancy in the Business Seat 3 on the Hazardous Materials Commission for a term ending
December 31, 2024, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health
Services Director.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.12 APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional
privileges, medical staff advancement, and voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive
Committee and the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Appropriation Adjustments
C.13 Employment and Human Services Department (0501): APPROVE Appropriation Adjustment No.005022
authorizing the transfer of current year appropriation of $1,750,000 from the Employment and Human Services
Department - Administration (Admin) to the Employment and Human Services Department - Workforce
Development Board (WDB), as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (100% Measure X)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.14 P-6 Zone (7656)/Sheriff's Office (0255): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No. 005025
authorizing new revenue in the amount of $600,000 from Service Area P-6 funding and appropriating it for the
purchase of Tasers, in the Sheriff's Office (0255), Training Division (2501). (100% P-6 Zone Funding)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Personnel Actions
C.15 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25929 to establish the classifications of Respiratory Care
Services Manager and add one position, Respiratory Care Services Supervisor and add two positions, and
Cardiology Services Manager and add one (1) position; and abolish the classifications of Assistant Chief
Cardiolpulomonary Support Services and Chief Cardiolpulomonary Support Services and cancel vacant positions in
those classifications; and cancel two Public Health Program Specialist I, and one Ambulatory Care Clinical
Coordinator (VAHB) positions in the Health Services Department. (Cost Savings, Hospital Enterprise Fund
I)(Represented)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.16 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25985 to reclassify one Public Health Nutritionist (represented)
and its incumbent to Senior Public Health Nutritionist (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100%
Older Americans Act Adjustment Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.17 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26071 to add one limited term Elections Services Supervisor
(represented) position in the Clerk-Recorder Department. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.18 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26074 to cancel one (1) Network Technician II (represented),
one (1) Information Systems Project Manager (represented), one (1) Information Systems Manager I (represented),
one (1) Account Clerk Experienced Level (represented), and add one (1) Network Administrator II (represented),
one (1) Information Systems Manager II (represented), one (1) Information Systems Division Director (exempt) in
the Department of Information Technology. (100% User Departments)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Leases
C.19 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a lease with Unites States
Postal Service for a term of two years, effective January 1, 2023, for 2,223 square feet of office and storage space
for the Office of the Sheriff – Court Security, located at 815 Court Street, Martinez, at an annual rent of $41,217
with no increases. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Grants & Contracts
Grants & Contracts
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of
fund and/or services:
C.20 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Director, or designee, to accept and execute any necessary
documents associated with the California for All Animals Program Grant from The Regents of the University of
California, on behalf of its Davis Campus School of Veterinary Medicine in an amount not to exceed $200,000, to
update the department's strategic plan, community engagement program, and marketing program, for the period of
September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2024. (100% State funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.21 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment
with the City of Concord, effective July 1, 2022, to increase the amount payable to the County by $400,000 to a new
amount of up to $1,066,218 and to extend the term from June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2023 for the continuation of
CORE Program services in Concord. (No County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.22 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/414 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept State
Homeland Security Grant Program funds in an initial amount of $1,200,000 from the California Governor’s Office
of Emergency Services to assist in preventing and responding to terrorist attacks for the period of September 1,
2022, through the end of the grant fund availability. (100% Federal, no County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.23 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant award from the
Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, in an
amount up to $1,016,548 for the Mobile Crisis Response Team Expansion Project for the period September 30,
2022 through September 29, 2023. (No County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.24 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant award with the
Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, in an amount up to
$1,000,000 for the Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending - Construction to be used to
renovate the A3 Wellness campus located at 1034 Oak Grove Road in Concord for the period August 1, 2022
through July 31, 2025. (No County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.25 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/492 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or
designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Community Services and Development to accept
funding in an amount not to exceed $3,367,278 for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
for the period November 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024. (100% Federal) (No County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the
purchase of equipment and/or services:
C.26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Leica
Microsystems, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $596,174 for the purchase of tissue sample equipment and reagent
supplies for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center for the period from September 1, 2022, through August 31,
2027. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.27 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a letter of termination
with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. to terminate Quality Controls Purchase Agreement dated June 28, 2022, and
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a
purchase order with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, and any related letters of
participation, for the purchase of reagents and supplies for the Clinical Laboratory at the Contra Costa Regional
Medical Center for the period of July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2027. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.28 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract
amendment with Environmental Science Associates, a corporation, to extend the term from December 31, 2022
through December 31, 2023 with no change to the payment limit of $402,588, to complete the California
Environmental Quality Act review process for the Keller Canyon Landfill land use permit amendment. (100% land
use permit fees)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.29
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with
Diablo Valley Perinatal Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $700,000 to provide high-risk
obstetrics perinatology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the
period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.30 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with
Robinson Mills + Williams, effective November 29, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $1,000,000 to a new
payment limit of $2,500,000 to continue providing as-needed architectural services for various County projects, with
no change to the term, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, on behalf of the Probation Department, to
purchase 140 Target gift cards in the following amounts; one hundred (100) $20 gift cards and forty (40) $50 gift
cards for a total of $4,000, to provide support to foster parents caring for youth prior to the Resource Family
Approval process. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Human Resources Director, or designee, to extend the contract term with
C.32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Human Resources Director, or designee, to extend the contract term with
Worxtime, LLC through December 31, 2023, and increase the contract payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment
limit of $375,000 to file required IRS reports and mail health insurance coverage statements to County
employees.(100% Benefits Administration fee)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the County Librarian, a
purchase order with Baker & Taylor in an amount not to exceed $360,249 for book rental for the Contra Costa
County Library, for the period January 1 through December 31, 2023. (100% Library Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Vasanta
Venkat Giri, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $263,578 to provide telepsychiatry services to children and
adolescents in Central Contra Costa County for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (50%
Federal Medi-Cal, 50% Mental Health Realignment)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with West
Coast Kidney Institute, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to provide nephrology services for Contra Costa
Health Plan members and County recipients for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (100%
Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Master Software
Subscription Agreement with edu Business Solutions, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $74,485 for Print Shop Pro
installation, maintenance and training for the period December 6, 2022 through December 5, 2027, Countywide
(100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute on behalf of the Health Services Department,
a purchase order with Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc. (CAPS) in an amount not to exceed $260,000 for
the compounding of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) and Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN) Intravenous (IV)
Solutions for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers patients for the period December 1, 2022
through November 30, 2023. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a
purchase order with Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. (dba Curascript Specialty Distribution) in an amount not to
exceed $500,000, for Nexplanon contraceptive implants for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers,
and the Martinez and West County Detention Center patients for the period December 1, 2022 through November
30, 2023. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with
C.39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with
Telemedicine Group P.C. (dba TeleMed2U), in an amount not to exceed $1,800,000 to provide behavioral health
and medical psychiatric telehealth services to Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period January 1, 2023
through December 31, 2025. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment
with Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing, Inc. (dba Hope Solutions), effective January 1, 2023, to increase
the payment limit by $375,000 to a new payment limit of $990,282 with no change in the term for additional
housing navigation services to homeless individuals and families in Contra Costa County. (48% State Housing
Security, 41% Housing and Urban Development Coordinated Entry, 11% Employment and Human Services
Department)
Speaker: Sharon Al.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., effective December 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $50,000 to a new
payment limit of $230,000 and extend the term through March 31, 2024, for on-call stormwater consulting services,
Countywide. (100% Stormwater Utility Assessment Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Signature
Parking, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $738,056 to provide parking management services for Contra Costa
Regional Medical Center for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024. (100% Hospital Enterprise
Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Shelter,
Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,138,309 to provide housing support services to County residents experiencing
homelessness who have a disability and are receiving services in the supportive housing program for the period
December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. (99% Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1% Mental
Health Services Act)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Portia Bell
Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center, in an amount not to exceed $1,179,313 to provide case management
and rapid resolution counseling to county residents who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless for the
period October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (50% Adult Protective Services Home Safe Program, 30% Public
Defender Funds, 10% California Emergency Solutions Housing Grant, 8% Housing and Urban Development Grant,
2% Housing Security Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute an Assignment and Assumption of
C.45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute an Assignment and Assumption of
Contract and Consent with Gemalto Cogent, Inc. and Thales DIS, USA, Inc. to recognize the merger of Gemalto
Cogent, Inc. into Thales DIS USA, Inc. effective September 30, 2020 and to execute a contract amendment with
Thales DIS, USA, Inc. to extend the term from December 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023 plus two optional one-year
term extensions. (100% CAL-ID funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner or designee, to execute an Agreement with Attenti US,
Inc., in an amount not to exceed $700,000 for the purchase of electronic home monitoring services, equipment and
related products as needed at the Sheriff's Office Custody Alternative Facility for the period December 1, 2022
through November 30, 2025. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract
amendment with McHale's Environmental Insulation, Inc., to extend the term from December 31, 2022 through
April 30, 2023 and increase the payment limit by $50,000 to a new payment limit of $230,000, to provide additional
insulation services to low-income County residents through the Department’s Weatherization Program. (100% State
and Federal Weatherization funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Other Actions
C.48 ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report of the Treasury Oversight Committee, as recommended by the Contra
Costa County Treasurer-Tax Collector.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.49 ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, as recommended by the
County Treasurer-Tax Collector.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.50 APPROVE the Employment and Human Services Department's amended Services Awards Policy, effective
December 1, 2022, and AUTHORIZE the expenditure of up to $15,000 annually for recognizing and appreciating
public service, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (59% Federal, 35% State, 6%
County)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.51 APPROVE the delegation of authority to the County Treasurer for investing and reinvesting County funds
and the funds of other depositors in the County treasury, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, pursuant to
section 53607 of the State Government Code.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.52 RECEIVE and ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report submitted by the Aviation Advisory Committee.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.53 ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Advisory Committee 2022 Annual
Report and 2023 Work Plan, as recommended by the Health Services Director.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.54 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the East Contra Costa Irrigation District, including the list
of designated positions and disclosure categories, as recommended by County Counsel.
Speaker: No name given.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.55 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Kensington Police Protection & Community Services
District, as recommended by County Counsel.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C.56 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Rodeo Sanitary District, including the list of designated
positions, as recommended by the County Counsel.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane
Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for
that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the
Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public
inspection at 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours.
All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There
will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the
time the Board votes on the motion to adopt.
Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those
persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is
subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the
Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 1025 Escobar
Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us.
The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact
the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 655-2000.
Anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda may contact the Office of the
County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California.
County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California.
Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000 or using the
County's on line subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be
viewed:
www.contracosta.ca.gov
STANDING COMMITTEES
The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the
month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord.
The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of
the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in
Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first
Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the
month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00
p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street, Martinez.
The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at
10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other
month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the
second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings.
Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order):
Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board
of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral
presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings:
AB Assembly Bill
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees
AICP American Institute of Certified Planners
AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs
ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District
BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System
BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission
BGO Better Government Ordinance
BOS Board of Supervisors
CALTRANS California Department of Transportation
CalWIN California Works Information Network
CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids
CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response
CAO County Administrative Officer or Office
CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority
CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
CCWD Contra Costa Water District
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIO Chief Information Officer
COLA Cost of living adjustment
ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CPA Certified Public Accountant
CPI Consumer Price Index
CSA County Service Area
CSAC California State Association of Counties
CTC California Transportation Commission
dba doing business as
DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program
EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District
ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health)
et al. et alii (and others)
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
F&HS Family and Human Services Committee
First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10)
FTE Full Time Equivalent
FY Fiscal Year
GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District
GIS Geographic Information System
HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development
HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HOV High Occupancy Vehicle
HR Human Resources
HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
IHSS In-Home Supportive Services
Inc. Incorporated
IOC Internal Operations Committee
ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance
JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement
Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area
LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission
LLC Limited Liability Company
LLP Limited Liability Partnership
Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1
LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse
MAC Municipal Advisory Council
MBE Minority Business Enterprise
M.D. Medical Doctor
M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist
MIS Management Information System
MOE Maintenance of Effort
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
NACo National Association of Counties
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology
O.D. Doctor of Optometry
OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center
OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services
PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act
Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology
RDA Redevelopment Agency
RFI Request For Information
RFP Request For Proposal
RFQ Request For Qualifications
RN Registered Nurse
SB Senate Bill
SBE Small Business Enterprise
SEIU Service Employees International Union
SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative
SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee
TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central)
TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County)
TRE or TTE Trustee
TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee
UASI Urban Area Security Initiative
VA Department of Veterans Affairs
vs. versus (against)
WAN Wide Area Network
WBE Women Business Enterprise
WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RECEIVE report from the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) on the Draft Housing Element of the County General Plan,
accept public comments, and provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time. The Housing Element is not a budget document and does not contain funding recommendations. The final Housing Element
document, when it is considered in 2023, will have funding implications for future budget cycles.
The 6th Cycle Housing Element consultant work is being funded by DCD's Land Development Fund and two State grants DCD obtained to
support the effort: Local Early Action Planning Grant (up to $190,000) and Senate Bill 2 Planning Grant (up to $71,250).
BACKGROUND:
A. INTRODUCTION
California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and demand of
Californians, local governments must adopt plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for (and do not unduly constrain) housing
development. As a result, housing policy in California rests largely on the effective implementation of local general plans and, in particular,
local housing elements. DCD, in coordination with Housing Element (HE) consultants PlaceWorks, have been preparing an update to the
County’s Housing Element as required by State Law. The updated HE addresses the ways in which the County would plan for its Regional
Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) share of units assigned by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). The HE is used to meet the needs of residents of various income levels and needs within the
community.
On November 18, 2022, the first draft of the HE was released for public review and comment. A copy of the draft is attached, can be found
through the Envision Contra Costa 2040 website, and a public review hardcopy is available at the Department of Conservation and
Development. A study session on the draft HE was scheduled with the Planning Commission on November 30, 2022. Staff is also seeking
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Maureen Toms 925 655-2895
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.1
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Draft Housing Element Study Session
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
feedback from the Board of Supervisors, particularly on goals, policies and actions as well as the opportunity sites inventory. Following the
end of the public review period (December 19, 2022), and the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors study sessions, the public
feedback will be evaluated, Board guidance will be heeded and draft HE will be updated and submitted to the HCD. HCD has a 90-day
review period and will provide the County with comments and a findings letter. Once the findings from HCD are reviewed and
modifications to the HE are made, the HE will be resubmitted to HCD for a 60-day review. Following approvals from HCD, the HE can
then go before the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for consideration and adoption. The hearings to consider adoption of the
final HE are anticipated to be held in the Summer of 2023.
B. BACKGROUND
The development and preservation of housing is important to all the people within Contra Costa County. To plan for the development of
adequate housing for all income segments, a HE is prepared as a part of the General Plan. The HE is the chapter of the General Plan related
to affordable housing and other housing options in a jurisdiction and must be updated every eight years. It is the only element of a General
Plan subject to review and certification by HCD. All Bay Area jurisdictions must update their HEs and have them approved by HCD by the
start of the next cycle, 2023-31, referred to as the "6th Cycle”.
State housing law continues to change, and requirements for HEs have evolved since the Board approved the 5th Cycle HE, which covers
2015-23. Additionally, HCD has given every region in California a target for new residential units for the 6th Cycle. Through an allocation
process managed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), unincorporated Contra Costa County must show capacity for
7,610 new units in the planning period, and then report annually on satisfactory progress in meeting that target or lose discretionary
approval powers over certain land use decisions. In the current 5th Cycle, the County's unit target was 1,367, and as of April 1, 2022,
reporting period, a total of 2,408 units have been constructed, exceeding the overall goal while concurrently falling short on the income
categories.
Regional Housing Need Allocation
Income Category
Area Median
Income
Percentage
5 th Cycle
2015-2023
6 th Cycle
2023-2031
Very Low <50%374 2,072
Low 50-80%218 1,194
Moderate 80-120%243 1,211
Above Moderate >120%532 3,133
Total 1,367 7,610
C. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT
While the housing element must address specific state statutory requirements identified in Government Code section 65580 – 65588, it is
ultimately a local plan and should reflect the vision and priorities of the community. The Housing Element contents are described below.
1. Housing Element Introduction 6.1
Section 6.1, Introduction, of this HE reviews the geographic areas covered by the Contra Costa County HE, the purpose and content of the
HE, the public participation process undertaken to assist in the development of the HE, and its relationship with the rest of the General Plan.
In preparation of the HE, opportunities are provided for the public to help shape the County’s housing goals, policies, and strategies.
Opportunities for input on the County’s 2023–2031 HE have been provided so far through various forums. One significant method was via
outreach for the General Plan Update currently underway through the Envision Contra Costa 2040 process. The
https://envisioncontracosta2040.org/ website is one of the main channels for sharing information with the public about the HE Update and
General Plan Update.
The County sought participation and input from people who represent the full range of demographics, perspectives, and experiences in
Contra Costa County, including existing residents, local workers, the residential development community, nonprofit housing developers,
housing advocates, historically underrepresented community members, and community organizations representing special needs groups
such as older adults, youth and students, immigrants, people experiencing homelessness and people with disabilities. Details of the outreach
efforts are described in the Draft HE.
2. Housing Needs Assessment (6.2)
The Housing Needs Assessment section of the Draft HE includes an analysis of demographic, socioeconomic, housing characteristics, and
market data of the county as a whole and the unincorporated areas of the county to determine the nature and extent of housing needs now
and in the future. It should be noted that the main source of the information is this section is from an approved data set provided by the
Association of Bay Area Governments.
3. Housing Constraints (6.3)
Housing constraints, such as development costs, government constraints, lack of infrastructure, and environmental issues, affect the supply
of housing in the unincorporated areas of the county. The Housing Constraints section of the HE assesses realistic development potential,
considering the market trends, development standards, environmental constraints, and infrastructure/public facility/service constraints.
4. Housing Resources (6.4)
ABAG is responsible for developing the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), which assigns a share of the region’s future housing
need to each jurisdiction in the ABAG region. State law requires communities to demonstrate that they have sufficient land to accommodate
their share of the region’s need for housing During the 6 th Cycle HE period. For the current planning period, ABAG has determined that
the County’s share of the RHNA is 7,610 new housing units.
The Housing Resources section of the Draft HE analyzes the resources available for the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of
housing in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. This analysis includes an evaluation of the availability of land resources for
future housing development, the County’s ability to satisfy its share of the region’s future housing needs, the financial resources available
to support housing activities, and the administrative resources available to assist in implementing the County’s housing programs.
5. Housing Accomplishments (6.5)
This section of the HE summarized the County’s housing accomplishments during the current 5th cycle HE for the period of 2015 through
2022. The 2014 RHNA Allocation was 1,367 total units (374-very low, 218-low, 243 moderate, and 532 above moderate units). As of the
April 1, 2022, reporting period, a total of 2,408 units have been constructed.
6. Housing Plan (6.6)
The Housing Plan section of the Draft HE presents the County’s eight-year plan which sets forth goals, policies, and programs to address the
identified housing needs and other important housing issues. The County’s housing plan for addressing the identified housing needs is
detailed according to the following six areas:
Provision of Adequate Residential Sites (including an adequate buffer)
Assist in the Development of Adequate Housing to Meet the Needs of Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and Persons with
Special Needs
Conserve and Improve the Existing Housing Stock
Preserve Units at Risk of Conversion to Market-Rate Units
Address and Remove or Mitigate Governmental Constraints
Equal Housing Opportunities
Sites Inventory:
Following the above six sections of the HE is Appendix A: Sites Inventory. The Sites Inventory identifies and evaluates the housing
capacity at 91 sites.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Comments received as part of the public meeting will not be incorporated into the on the Draft Housing Element submitted to the California
Department of Housing and Community Development.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speakers: No name given; Hanna, Partnership for the Bay's Future.
Staff noted the draft contains a clerical error in the zoning listed for the Mauzy School in Alamo, which will be corrected before submission
to the state.
RECEIVED the report; ACCEPTED public comment; and DIRECTED staff to ensure that expedition of our response occurs and
upon the first response from HCD the county adopt the housing element and incorporating responses as appropriate.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Housing Element
Presentation- Housing Element
Contra Costa County Housing Element Update
2023-2031HOUSING ELEMENT
Public Draft • November 2022
Contra Costa County Housing Element Update
2023-2031HOUSING ELEMENT
Public Draft • November 2022
ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE
www.placeworks.com
Prepared By: PlaceWorks
2040 Bancroft Way, Suite 400
Berkeley, California 94704
t 510.848.3815
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element i
Table of Contents
6 Housing Element ..................................................................................................... 6-1
6.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 6-1
A. Community Context ................................................................................. 6-1
B. Role and Content of Housing Element ................................................. 6-6
C. Data Sources ............................................................................................ 6-7
D. Public Participation ................................................................................... 6-8
6.2 Housing Needs Assessment ................................................................. 23
A. Population and Employment Trends....................................................... 23
B. Household Characteristics ........................................................................ 27
C. Housing Stock Characteristics ................................................................. 29
D. Special Housing Needs Analysis.............................................................. 37
E. Loss of Assisted Housing ......................................................................... 47
F. Future Housing Need ................................................................................ 52
G. Assessment of Fair Housing .................................................................... 52
6.3 Housing Constraints ........................................................................... 111
A. Market Constraints .................................................................................. 111
B. Governmental Constraints ..................................................................... 113
C. Environmental, Infrastructure, and Public Service Constraints ........ 141
6.4 Housing Resources ............................................................................. 145
A. Availability of Sites for Housing ............................................................ 145
B. Financial Resources ................................................................................ 170
C. County Administrative Resources ......................................................... 179
D. Local Affordable Housing Developer Capacity ................................... 180
E. Opportunities for Energy Conservation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas
Emissions ................................................................................................. 182
6.5 Housing Accomplishments ................................................................. 189
A. Evaluation of Accomplishments under Adopted Housing Element 189
B. Housing Production in Previous RHNA Period .................................. 192
6.6 Housing Plan ........................................................................................ 195
A. Housing Goals, Policies, and Actions .................................................. 195
B. Related Plans ........................................................................................... 220
A. Appendix A: Sites Inventory .............................................................................. A-1
Sites Inventory Maps .......................................................................................... A-1
Sites to Address the Lower Income RHNA ................................................... A-21
B. Appendix B: Review of Previous Housing Element Programs ................... B-1
T ABLES
Table 6-1 Population Growth Trends And Projections ...................... 6-23
Table 6-2 Housing Tenure by Household Type in Unincorporated
Contra Costa County ............................................................. 6-24
Table 6-3 Race and Ethnicity in Unincorporated Contra Costa
County ..................................................................................... 6-23
Table 6-4 Population by Age in Unincorporated Contra Costa
County ..................................................................................... 6-23
Table 6-5 Employment Growth Trends And Projections ................... 6-24
Table 6-6 Employment Profile ............................................................... 6-24
ii Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Table 6-7 Wage Statistics for Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties ................................................................................... 6-25
Table 6-8 Major Employers .................................................................... 6-25
Table 6-9 Employment Trends and Projections – Contra Costa
County ...................................................................................... 6-26
Table 6-10 Household Type ..................................................................... 6-27
Table 6-11 2021 Income Levels – Contra Costa County ................... 6-27
Table 6-12 Housing Tenure ...................................................................... 6-28
Table 6-13 Workers by Earnings, by Jurisdiction as Place of Work
and Place of Residence - Unincorporated Contra
Costa ........................................................................................ 6-28
Table 6-14 Housing by Tenure and Income - Unincorporated
County ...................................................................................... 6-29
TablE 6-15 Household Size by Tenure - Unincorporated County ...... 6-29
Table 6-16 Cost Burden by Income Level - Unincorporated
County ...................................................................................... 6-29
Table 6-17 Housing Tenure ...................................................................... 6-30
Table 6-18 Housing Stock in 2021 in Unincorporated Contra
Costa County .......................................................................... 6-30
Table 6-19 Occupancy Status .................................................................. 6-30
Table 6-20 Vacant Units by Type ............................................................ 6-31
Table 6-21 Housing Age-Year Built by Tenure in Unincorporated
Contra Costa County ............................................................. 6-32
Table 6-22 2021 Median Sales Prices in Unincorporated Contra
Costa County .......................................................................... 6-33
Table 6-23 Median Rents in Unincorporated Contra Costa
County* .................................................................................... 6-34
Table 6-24 Rental Price Ranges ............................................................... 6-34
Table 6-25 Housing Affordability Matrix (2022) ................................. 6-36
Table 6-26 Overcrowding Severity .......................................................... 6-37
Table 6-27 Special-Needs Groups in Unincorporated Contra
Costa County .......................................................................... 6-38
Table 6-28 Farm Labor in Contra Costa County .................................. 6-43
Table 6-29 Contra Costa Homeless Facility Inventory......................... 6-45
Table 6-30 Potential Rent Subsidies ....................................................... 6-48
Table 6-31 Inventory of Assisted Rental Housing ................................ 6-50
Table 6-32 Regional Housing Need Assessment ................................. 6-52
Table 6-33 Median Income by Unincorporated Area ........................... 6-57
Table 6-34 Overcrowded Households by Tenure ................................. 6-75
Table 6-35 Cost Burden by Tenure and Race/Ethnicity ...................... 6-77
Table 6-36 ECHO Housing Fair Housing Cases, 2018-2021 ........... 6-87
Table 6-37 HUD Fair Housing Cases, 2013-2021 ............................. 6-88
Table 6-38 Factors that Contribute to Fair Housing Issues ............ 6-109
Table 6-38 Interest Rates – November 2021 ................................... 6-112
Table 6-39 Residential Land Use Categories ..................................... 6-114
Table 6-40 Single-Family Residential Development Standards ...... 6-115
Table 6-41 Multi-family Residential Development Standards .......... 6-116
Table 6-42 Parking Requirements ........................................................ 6-117
Table 6-43 General Density Restrictions and Allowed Residential
uses in Mixed-Use Areas of Contra Costa County ........ 6-119
Table 6-44 Minimum Number of Inclusionary Units by Household
Income by Type and Number of Housing Units
Developed ............................................................................ 6-120
Table 6-45 Housing Types Permitted by Zone District .................... 6-124
Table 6-46 Roadway Design Standards .............................................. 6-132
Table 6-47 Development Impact Fees Unincorporated Areas ........ 6-133
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element iii
Table 6-48 Proportion of Fees of Total Residential Development
Costs ..................................................................................... 6-135
Table 6-49 Estimated Development Review Time Frames .............. 6-138
Table 6-50 Residential Projects Approved or Under Construction . 6-147
Table 6-51 Representative Medium- and Lower-Density Projects
in Unincorporated Contra Costa County ......................... 6-152
Table 6-52 Representative Multifamily Higher-Density Projects in
Unincorporated Contra Costa County ............................. 6-153
Table 6-53 Vacant and Underutilized Residential Sites Analysis .... 6-154
Table 6-54 Communities and Service Districts .................................. 6-160
Table 6-55 Remaining RHNA by Income Group ................................ 6-169
Table 6-56 Financial Resources for Housing Activities ..................... 6-171
Table 6-38 County-wide Assisted New Construction
2015-2021 ......................................................................... 6-193
Table 6-39 Quantified Eight-Year Objectives ...................................... 6-221
Site 1: Appian Way Church-Owned Site ...................................................... A-22
Site 2: San Pablo Dam Road Old Gas Station ........................................... A-23
Site 3: Former Nursery Site ........................................................................... A-24
Site 4: Appian Way and La Paloma Road ................................................... A-25
Site 5: Appian Way at Corte Arango ............................................................ A-26
Site 6: Appian Way at Sunhill Circle ............................................................. A-27
Site 7: Near San Pablo Dam Road and Pitt Way ....................................... A-28
Site 8: Appian Way near Santa Rita Road ................................................... A-29
Site 9: 4462 Appian Way .............................................................................. A-30
Site 10: Appian Way and San Pablo Dam Road ........................................ A-31
Site 11: San Pablo Dam Road near El Portal Drive .................................. A-32
Site 12: Hillcrest Road and Pitt Way ............................................................ A-33
Site 13: Appian Way near Pebble Drive ...................................................... A-34
Site 14: 4th Street near Grove Avenue ........................................................ A-35
Site 15: End of 6th Street .............................................................................. A-36
Site 16: Carmen Lane .................................................................................... A-37
Site 17: Solano Ave. near Alfaro Ave. .......................................................... A-38
Site 18: Danville Blvd. and Casa Maria Ct. ................................................. A-39
Site 19: Poinsettia Ave. .................................................................................. A-40
Site 20: Willow Pass Rd. at Bella Vista Ave. ............................................... A-41
Site 21: North Richmond cluster of housing authority sites ................... A-42
Site 22: N. Broadway Ave. and Alfaro Ave. ................................................ A-44
Site 23: Southwood Drive ............................................................................. A-45
Site 24: Poinsettia Ave. and Willow Pass Rd. ............................................. A-46
Site 25: Sapone Lane .................................................................................... A-47
Site 26: N. Broadway Ave. near Alfaro Ave. ............................................... A-48
Site 27: Bel Air Lane ...................................................................................... A-49
Site 28: Parker Ave. between 1st and 2nd Streets ..................................... A-50
Site 29: Fred Jackson Way and Market Ave. .............................................. A-51
Site 30: 1730 Fred Jackson Way ................................................................. A-52
Site 31: San Pablo Ave. at Tara Hills Dr. .................................................... A-53
Site 32: 7th St. at Rodeo Ave. ....................................................................... A-54
Site 33: 7th St. and Chesley Ave. ................................................................. A-55
Site 34: San Pablo Ave. near Skyline .......................................................... A-56
Site 35: Tara Hills Dr. and San Pablo Ave. ................................................. A-57
Site 36: 1st st. and Parker Ave. ..................................................................... A-58
Site 37: Willow Pass Rd. near Clearland Dr. .............................................. A-59
Site 38: Parker Ave. At Investment St. ........................................................ A-60
Site 39: Pacheco Community Center Site .................................................. A-61
Site 40: N. Broadway ave. near Willow Pass Rd. ...................................... A-62
Site 41: Alberts Ave. and Willow Pass Rd. .................................................. A-63
iv Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Site 42: Richmond Union High School Site ................................................ A-64
Site 43: Willow Pass Rd. and Solano Ave. .................................................. A-65
Site 44: Mims Avenue .................................................................................... A-66
Site 45: Canal Road ........................................................................................ A-67
Site 46: Mims Ave. and Canal Rd. ................................................................ A-68
Site 47: Bixler Road at regatta Drive ........................................................... A-69
Site 48: DIscovery Bay Blvd. ......................................................................... A-70
Site 49: N. Broadway Ave near Pullman Ave. ............................................ A-71
Site 50: N. Broadway Ave near W Siino Ave. ............................................. A-72
Site 51: 2nd St. and W. Ruby St. ................................................................... A-73
Site 52: Chesley Ave. and 2nd St. ................................................................. A-74
Site 53: 1st St. and W. Ruby St. .................................................................... A-75
Site 54: 2nd st. near Grove Ave. .................................................................... A-76
Site 55: 1st St. near W. Ruby St. ................................................................... A-77
Site 56: Giaramita St. ..................................................................................... A-78
Site 57: 6th St. and Grove Ave. ..................................................................... A-79
Site 58: 6th St. near Silver Ave. ..................................................................... A-80
Site 59: Sixth St. near Grove Ave. ................................................................ A-81
Site 60: Giaramita St. at Silver Ave. ............................................................. A-82
Site 61: Sixth St. near Market Ave. .............................................................. A-83
Site 62: Giaramita St. and Silver Ave. – NE Corner .................................. A-84
Site 63: Giaramita St. and Silver Ave. – NW Corner ................................. A-85
Site 64: 4th St. and Market Ave. ................................................................... A-86
Site 65: 5th St. and Silver Ave. ...................................................................... A-87
Site 66: 4th St. near Silver Ave. ..................................................................... A-88
Site 67: 4th St. near Grove Ave. .................................................................... A-89
Site 68: Silver Ave. near 2nd St. .................................................................... A-90
Site 69: Silver Ave. near Fred Jackson Way ................................................ A-91
Site 70: 1st St. near Silver Ave. ..................................................................... A-92
Site 71: Truman St. near Verde Ave. ........................................................... A-93
Site 72: Verde Ave. near Truman St. ........................................................... A-94
Site 73: Giaramita St. near Verde Ave. ........................................................ A-95
Site 74: Verde Ave. at Giaramita St. ............................................................ A-96
Site 75: 7th St. near Market Ave. .................................................................. A-97
Site 76: Market Ave. at 6th st. ....................................................................... A-98
Site 77: 6th St. near Verde Ave. .................................................................... A-99
Site 78: McAvoy Site ................................................................................... A-100
Site 79: Ray Lane ........................................................................................ A-101
Site 80: Creekside Community Church Owned Properties ................... A-102
Site 81: Orbisonia heights .......................................................................... A-103
Site 82: Appian Way Near SUnhill Circle .................................................. A-105
Site 83: St. Anne Village ............................................................................. A-106
Site 84: Discovery Bay Mixed Use ............................................................ A-107
Site 85: Pacheco Blvd ................................................................................. A-108
Site 86: Las Juntas Way and Oak Road ................................................... A-110
Site 87: Cherry Lane ................................................................................... A-111
Site 88: Kingston Place ............................................................................... A-112
Site 89: Mauzy School ................................................................................ A-114
Site 90: Crestwood Dr. ............................................................................... A-115
Site 91: Far HILLS Mobile Home Park ..................................................... A-116
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element v
FIGURES
Figure 6-1 Housing Element Sub Areas ............................................... 6-3
Figure 6-2 TCAC Resource Area Designations, 2021 ..................... 6-56
Figure 6-3 Rate of Poverty in Contra Costa County, 2019 ............ 6-58
Figure 6-4 Rate of Poverty in Contra Costa County, 2014 ............ 6-59
Figure 6-5 Predominant Populations .................................................. 6-62
Figure 6-6 Transit Scores, Contra Costa County .............................. 6-65
Figure 6-7 Job Proximity Index Scores ................................................ 6-68
Figure 6-8 Expected Educational Outcome Score ............................ 6-71
Figure 6-9 Environmental Burden ........................................................ 6-73
Figure 6-10 Homeowner Overpayment, 2019 .................................... 6-78
Figure 6-11 Renter Overpayment, 2019 .............................................. 6-79
Figure 6-12 Homeowner Overpayment, 2014 .................................... 6-80
Figure 6-13 Renter Overpayment, 2014 .............................................. 6-81
Figure 6-14 Sites by Income Category (Lower, Lower and Above
Moderate, Moderate and Above Moderate) ................. 6-90
Figure 6-15 Sites by Income Category (Above Moderate,
Moderate)6- ....................................................................... 6-91
Figure 6-16 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by TCAC Resource Area Designation ............................. 6-92
Figure 6-17 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Median Income ............................................................. 6-95
Figure 6-18 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Percentage of Population Below the Poverty Line . 6-96
Figure 6-19 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Predominant Population .............................................. 6-98
Figure 6-20 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Female-Headed Households with Children .............. 6-99
Figure 6-21 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Percentage of Population with a Disability ........... 6-101
Figure 6-22 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Jobs Proximity Index Score ...................................... 6-102
Figure 6-23 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Educational Domain Score ...................................... 6-104
Figure 6-23 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by CalEnviroScreen Score ............................................. 6-105
Figure 6-25 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Percentage of Overcrowded Households ............. 6-106
Figure 6-26 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Percentage of Homeowners Overpaying for
Housing ............................................................................ 6-107
Figure 6-27 Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage
by Percentage of Renters Overpaying for Housing .. 6-108
Figure 6-26 Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Service
Districts ................................................................................. 158
Figure 6-27 Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Service
Districts ................................................................................. 159
vi Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -1
6 HOUSING ELEMENT
6.1 Introduction
The development and preservation of housing is important to all the people
within Contra Costa County. To plan for the development of adequate
housing for all income segments, that includes recognition of the impacts of
climate change, a housing element is prepared as a part of the General Plan.
This document constitutes the Housing Element, which specifically addresses
housing needs and resources in the county’s unincorporated areas. Section
6.1, Introduction, of this Element reviews the geographic areas covered by
the Contra Costa County Housing Element, the purpose and content of the
Element, the public participation process undertaken to assist in the
development of the Element, and its relationship with the rest of the General
Plan.
A. COMMUNITY CONTEXT
1. County Geography
Established in 1850, the County of Contra Costa is one of nine counties in
the San Francisco Bay Area. The county covers 733 square miles and
extends from the northeastern shore of San Francisco Bay easterly to San
Joaquin County. The county is bordered on the south and west by Alameda
County and on the north by Suisun and San Pablo Bays. The western and
northern communities are highly industrialized, while the inland areas
contain a variety of urban, suburban/residential, commercial, light industrial,
and agricultural uses.
Contra Costa County is made up of large unincorporated areas and the cities
and towns of Antioch, Brentwood, Clayton, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito,
Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg,
Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Pablo, San Ramon, and Walnut Creek. The
unincorporated areas include the following communities: Acalanes Ridge,
Alamo, Alhambra Valley, Bay Point, Bayview, Bethel Island, Blackhawk,
Briones, Byron, Camino Tassajara, Canyon, Castle Hill, Clyde, Contra Costa
Centre, Crockett, Diablo, Discovery Bay, East Richmond Heights, El Sobrante,
Kensington, Knightsen, Montalvin Manor, Mountain View, Norris Canyon,
North Gate, North Richmond, Pacheco, Port Costa, Rodeo, Rollingwood, San
Miguel, Saranap, Tara Hills, and Vine Hill. The incorporated cities and towns
are separate political entities; the unincorporated areas are within the land
use jurisdiction of the County government.
The county is large and diverse. It encompasses several housing sub-
markets, which are determined by a combination of topography, historical
development patterns, and social and economic phenomena. In general, the
county can be divided into three primary subregions -- West, Central, and
East (see Figure 6-1, Housing Element Sub Areas). West County is urbanized
with a developed industrial base. Central County is a developed urbanized
area with extensive office and light industrial development. East County has
historically been primarily agricultural but is now experiencing considerable
residential development. Figure 6-1 illustrates the geographic relationship
6 -2 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
between the cities and towns and the unincorporated areas. This Housing
Element is concerned with the housing needs, constraints, resources, and
solutions for the unincorporated areas.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -3
FIGURE 6-1 HOUSING ELEMENT SUB AREAS
6 -4 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
2. County Residents
The 2020 population estimate by the California Department of Finance (DOF)
indicates that Contra Costa County is home to approximately 1,153,561
residents, making it the ninth-most populous county in California. Several
cities experienced significant population growth, welcoming 104,536 new
residents in the last decade. The DOF projects that the county’s population
will increase to 1,224,400 residents by 2030 and 1,338,400 residents by
2040.
According to DOF, the county’s unincorporated areas had a population of
174,257, representing a 10 percent increase since 2010. The DOF projects
the county’s unincorporated population to grow to 182,500 by 2040,
resulting in a 14.2 percent increase since 2010. Countywide growth was 9
percent in the last decade. Residents have been attracted to Contra Costa
County primarily due to the availability of rapid transit; close proximity to
major employment centers in Oakland, San Francisco, and the Silicon Valley;
as well as employment growth within the county along the Interstate 680
corridor and Tri-Valley area. The relatively affordable housing prices in the
county compared to other Bay Area counties also contribute to the
population growth.
Examining how the county’s unincorporated areas reflect the larger county,
however, the demographics of the county’s unincorporated population tend
to be Whiter and older. Between 2000 to 2019, unincorporated communities
have experienced increases in the Latino (58.8 percent), Asian (40 percent),
and “Other” populations, while simultaneously experiencing decreases in the
White (26.2 percent) and Black (14.3 percent) populations. Between 2010
and 2019, the largest percentage increase in age groups in unincorporated
Contra Costa County was for the 65 to 74 age group and the second-largest
percentage increase was in the 75 to 84 age group, highlighting an aging
population. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) show that
senior residents (age 62 and older) in unincorporated Contra Costa County
are mostly homeowners, with 86 percent owning homes and 14 percent
renting.
Contra Costa County has a fairly fast-growing workforce, with growth in its
employment base driven primarily by the need to provide health, education,
and professional services to an increasing local population. Between 2010
and 2020, there was a 13.7 percent increase in employment and a projected
16 percent increase in employment between 2010 and 2040 in
unincorporated Contra Costa County. The county is expected to gain an
estimated 65,530 more employed residents than jobs between 2020 and
2040. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) estimates that
unincorporated Contra Costa County will add approximately 2,850 new jobs
between 2020 and 2040. ABAG expects that Contra Costa County will
continue to provide “bedroom communities” for the workforce of other Bay
Area counties.
The Census defines a “household” as any group of people occupying a
housing unit, which may include single persons living alone, families related
through marriage or blood, or unrelated persons that share living quarters.
In unincorporated Contra Costa County, 20.1 percent of the households are
single persons living alone, 58 percent are families, and 21.9 percent are
unrelated persons sharing living quarters. Persons living in retirement or
convalescent homes, dormitories, or other group living situations are not
considered households. Household characteristics are important indicators
of the type and size of housing needed in a community.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -5
The median income for a Contra Costa household of four in 2021 was
$125,600. In 2019, the countywide median income was approximately
$99,700. There are differences in income by tenure; homeowners earn a
median income of $122,227, which is 86 percent higher than the renter
median income of $65,583. As is the case for many communities, renter
households are most predominant in income levels below $75,000;
homeowners are most predominant in the higher-income groups. In the
unincorporated county, approximately 13.2 percent of the households are
extremely low income, as defined by HUD (households earning 30 percent or
less of median family income [MFI]). ABAG projects an increase in population
of 9.8 percent between 2020 and 2040. Presuming extremely low-income
households continue to be 13.2 percent of the population, then by 2040,
there will be 25,256 extremely low-income households in the
unincorporated area. Income is the most important factor affecting the
housing opportunities available to a household and determining the ability
to balance housing costs with other basic necessities of life, factors that are
income-dependent.
Because of the high cost of housing in the Bay Area, many households
overpay for housing. A significant number of households spend more than
one-third of their incomes on housing.1 This level of housing payment is
typically considered burdensome and suggests that income growth has not
kept pace with the increase in housing costs. An estimated 19.8 percent of
the households in Contra Costa County have a cost burden of more than 30
1 The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has established five income categories based on county median family income (MFI). Extremely low-
income households are those earning income up to 30 percent of the county MFI. Very low-income households are those earning income up to 50 percent of the county MFI.
Low-income households are those earning 51 to 80 percent of the county MFI. Combined, the very low- and low-income households are referred to as lower-income households.
Moderate-income households are those earning 81 to 120 percent of the county MFI. Above-moderate households are those earning more than 120 percent of the county MFI.
percent. Approximately 15.1 percent have a cost burden of 50 percent or
more.
3. County Housing Market
Single-family homes are the predominant housing type in the county. This is
especially true in the unincorporated areas, where single-family dwellings
comprise 79.7 percent of the housing stock. Multi-family units account for
15.9 percent of the housing units, while the remaining 4.4 percent are
mobile homes. Although home prices are more affordable in Contra Costa
County than in most areas in the Bay Area, housing affordability is still an
important issue affecting many residents in the county.
Neighborhood and housing quality is another issue in unincorporated
county areas. Approximately 60 percent of the housing stock in
unincorporated areas was built before 1980 and another 28 percent was
built between 1980 and 1999. This indicates that a large portion of the
housing stock is more than 30 years old, the age when most homes begin to
have major repair or updating needs. The 2011 American Housing Survey
found that in the Oakland/Fremont Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), an
estimated 15,200 residential units had severe physical problems and 30,200
had moderate physical problems. Unincorporated Contra Costa County has
an estimated 6.4 percent of the total housing units in the Oakland/Fremont
MSA. Therefore, an estimated 2,906 units have severe or moderate physical
6 -6 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
problems. The American Housing Survey estimates that an additional 22,000
occupied housing units may have other rehabilitation needs, such as missing
roofing material, holes in roof, cracks in foundation, or broken/boarded
windows. More recent American Community Survey (ACS) and American
Housing Survey data is not available at the MSA or more specific scale. In
December 2021, the County Building Department shared that approximately
20 residential units per year in the unincorporated county are not habitable
and are in imminent need of replacement.
Vacancy rates are a useful indicator of the housing market’s overall health
and ability to accommodate new residents within the existing housing stock.
The ACS 5-year estimates for 2015 to 2019 indicate the countywide vacancy
rate is an estimated 4.6 percent. The unincorporated county had a slightly
higher vacancy rate (5.8 percent). The increase can be attributed to a higher
percentage of recreational/occasional use units in unincorporated areas of
the county, such as Bethel Island and Discovery Bay.
Contra Costa County is faced with various important housing issues:
preserving and enhancing the affordability of housing for all segments of the
population; addressing disparities in access to housing and resources;
providing new types of housing in response to changing demographic
trends; addressing the reality of the impacts of climate change from extreme
heat to air quality and from sea level rise to avaailablity of potable water as well
as maintaining and improving the quality of the housing stock; and achieving
a balance between employment and housing opportunities. This Housing
Element provides policies and actions to address these and other related
issues.
B. ROLE AND CONTENT OF HOUSING
ELEMENT
The Housing Element of the General Plan has three purposes:
1. To provide an assessment of both
current and future housing needs
and constraints in meeting these
needs.
2. To provide a strategy that
establishes housing goals, policies,
and actions.
3. To intentionally align housing
development with both
transportation and jobs/economic
development such to decrease
exposure to environmental toxins
such as air pollution in order to
create lived environments that enhance health and assist in preventing
disease.
This Housing Element represents Contra Costa County’s long-term
commitment to the development and improvement of housing with specific
goals for the short term, 2023 to 2031. This Element identifies the following
goals:
1. Maintain and improve the quality of the existing housing stock and
residential neighborhoods in Contra Costa County.
The availability of housing
is of vital statewide
importance, and the early
attainment of decent
housing and a suitable
living environment for
every Californian is a
priority of the highest
order.
-- California Government
Code, Section 65580
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -7
2. Preserve the existing affordable housing stock in Contra Costa County .
3. Increase the supply of housing with a priority on the development of
affordable housing, including housing affordable to extremely low-
income households.
4. Increase the supply of appropriate and supportive housing for special -
needs populations.
5. Improve housing affordability for both renters and homeowners .
6. Provide adequate sites through appropriate land use and zoning
designations to accommodate the County’s share of regional housing
needs.
7. Mitigate potential governmental constraints to housing development
and affordability.
8. Promote equal opportunity for all residents to reside in the housing of
their choice.
9. Promote energy-efficient retrofits of existing dwellings and exceeding
building code requirements in new construction.
The Housing Element consists of the following major components:
• An introduction reviewing the purpose and scope of the Element
(Section 6.1).
• An analysis of the county’s demographic profile, housing characteristics,
and existing and future housing needs and fair housing assessment
(Section 6.2).
• A review of potential market, governmental, and environmental
constraints to meeting the county’s identified housing needs (Section
6.3).
• An evaluation of the land, financial, and organizational resources
available to address the county’s identified housing needs and goals
(Section 6.4).
• An evaluation of accomplishments under the adopted Housing Element
(Section 6.5).
• A statement of the Housing Plan to address the county’s identified
housing needs, including housing goals, policies, and actions (Section
6.6).
C. DATA SOURCES
Various sources of information contribute to the Housing ElementABAG
provides a data package that has been pre-approved by the State
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and serves as
the primary data source for population and household characteristics. Dates
for data included in the ABAG data package may vary depending on the
selection of data that was made to provide the best data on the topic. The
main data source for the Assessment of Fair Housing was the HCD
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Data Viewer mapping tool .
Several additional data sources were used to supplement the 2021 ABAG
Data Package:
• Population and demographic estimates and projections by ABAG and
the DOF.
6 -8 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Housing market information, such as home sales, construction costs,
and rents, updated via online surveys.
• Data on special-needs groups, the services available, and gaps in the
service delivery system provided via service provider stakeholder
interviews.
• Lending patterns for home purchase and home improvement loans
through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database.
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The County encourages the participation of residents and local agencies in
the process of identifying housing needs and formulating housing policies
and actions. During the development of the Housing Needs Assessment
(Section 6.2), the County consulted with and/or obtained information from a
variety of organizations serving low- and moderate-income persons and
those with special needs. These agencies are referenced throughout the
document.
In preparation of the Housing Element, opportun ities are provided for the
public to help shape the County’s housing goals, policies, and strategies.
Opportunities for input on the County’s 2023–2031 Housing Element have
been provided so far through various forums. One significant method was via
outreach for the General Plan Update currently underway through the
Envision Contra Costa 2040 process. The https://envisioncontracosta2040.org/
website is one of the main channels for sharing information with the public
about the Housing Element Update and General Plan Update.
The County sought participation and input from people who represent the
full range of demographics, perspectives, and experiences in Contra Costa
County, including existing residents, local workers, the residential
development community, nonprofit housing developers, housing advocates,
historically underrepresented community members, and community
organizations representing special needs groups such as older adults, youth
and students, immigrants, people experiencing homelessness and people
with disabilities. Details of the outreach efforts follow.
1. Consultations
In August through October 2021, five consultations were conducted with
stakeholders to offer opportunities to each of them to provide one-on-one
input and receive targeted input from those who work on providing services
for those most in need of housing or with special housing needs . All
stakeholders called upon were available for an interview. Representatives
from the following organizations were interviewed:
• Hope Solutions on September 8, 2021.
• Choice in Aging on September 9, 2021.
• East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) on September 16, 2021.
• Contra Costa County Health Services Continuum of Care (COC)/Contra
Costa County Health, Housing, and Homeless Services (H3) on
September 14, 2021.
• Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) on October 4, 2021.
In each of the consultations, the stakeholders were asked some or all of the
following questions, depending on the type of organization interviewed:
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -9
• Opportunities and concerns: What three top opportunities do you see
for the future of housing in Contra Costa County? What are your three
top concerns for the future of housing in Contra Costa County?
• Housing Preferences: What types of housing do your clients prefer? Is
there adequate rental housing in the county? Are there opportunities
for home ownership? Are there accessible rental units for seniors and
persons with disabilities?
• Housing barriers/needs: What are the biggest barriers to finding
affordable, decent housing? Are there specific unmet housing needs in
the community?
• Housing conditions: How do you feel about the physical condition of
housing in Contra Costa County? What opportunities do you see to
improve housing in the future?
• Unhoused persons: How many unhoused persons are in Contra Costa
County?
• What factors limit or deny civil rights, fair housing choice, or equitable
access to opportunity? What actions can be taken to transform racially
and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity
(without displacement)? What actions can be taken to make living
patterns more integrated and balanced?
• How has COVID-19 affected the housing situation?
Through these interviews, the stakeholders expressed several concerns over
current challenges and barriers to housing in the county. These included the
need for more coordination at the decision-making/regional level to address
housing issues. There is a need for a housing champion to lead a unified
effort to address housing issues in the area by capturing state and federal
resources, bringing community organizations and jurisdictions together to
strategically address housing shortages across the county, and develop a
regional plan to address housing together as a collective county.
Additionally, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many unhoused
individuals found roofs over their heads due to federal assistance and
intervention. This infusion of money should be seen as a short -term solution
or “bandaid” solution to the ongoing housing shortage problems occurring
across the county. These federal dollars provided housing vouchers through
a rapid rehousing program to immediately address the need to house those
on the street, one of the populations most vulnerable to the effects of the
pandemic. This quick-fix solution will sunset in the near future and is not a
long-term solution. To continue to keep individuals and families housed in
Contra Costa County, several stakeholders mentioned the county requires
more housing with built-in services in-place (e.g., on-site case management,
on-site services behavior, and medical services). Current housing voucher
programs allow unhoused residents to have a roof over their head for a
short period but does not provide for them in the long term – vulnerable
groups such as those living with developmental, intellectual, and physical
disabilities are not currently given the resources and services to be
successful and stay housed.
As part of access to fair housing, several stakeholders have stated that there
is discrimination in Contra Costa County, specifically by landlords to tenants.
Other stakeholders have echoed that landlords and the application process
discriminates against households with certain characteristics, including
pregnant individuals, those with prior justice system involvement, and people
of color. A stakeholder suggested changing application processes like
background check requirements, which can deter certain groups from
6 -10 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
accessing housing. A countywide solution could be to collectively attract
landlords for all housing programs, providing them training and education
on what actions are creating issues and how to avoid them, etc. For example,
in one existing program, the county offers landlords a larger rental deposit
for County-screened individuals who are a part of a vulnerable population.
Moreover, a few stakeholders suggest the Board of Supervisors routinely
receive some type of equity training on housing so that these decision
makers better understand the power that they hold and the influence they
have on housing in the county, especially for vulnerable groups.
2. Focus Groups
The County held virtual focus groups on October 18, and November 3, 2021,
to elicit targeted feedback from housing developers and service providers .
County staff identified representatives to invite to the developer focus group
based on developers who have built projects in the unincorporated county
in recent years in addition to those who have participated in the General
Plan update process so far. Invitations to the service provider focus group
were coordinated with the staff at the County Health, Housing & Homeless
Services department and an announcement was made about the upcoming
focus group at the October Contra Costa County Continuum of Care (CoC)
meeting to invite members to participate. The October 18th focus group
included for-profit and nonprofit developers. The November 3rd focus group
included representatives from service provider organizations that are
members of the County CoC. To allow time for input and a conversation that
could include give and take between participants, the goal was to have the
2 Lower income includes the very low and low income categories as defined by the state.
focus groups include a maximum of 15 to 20 participants (in addition to
County staff and consultant team representatives).
October 18, 2021, Developer Focus Group
The developer focus group took place on October 18, 2021. There were 10
participants representing 10 organizations/companies that attended. The
following discussion questions were posed to the focus group participants:
1. Have you or your firm considered, or already constructed, housing in
unincorporated Contra Costa County?
2. If yes, have you constructed housing for lower2 income or other special
needs groups?
3. If you considered developing housing in Contra Costa County but
ultimately chose not to, what were the reasons?
4. What is the biggest challenge to building homes that are affordable to
lower- and moderate-income households in communities in
unincorporated Contra Costa County?
5. Do you or your firm have examples of successful projects where housing
for lower- and moderate-income households have been built? In what
communities did that happen? What makes projects successful in those
communities?
6. What types of policies or programs could the Housing Element include
that would help your firm’s development of affordable or workforce
housing in Contra Costa County?
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -11
7. Is your firm interested in building non-traditional housing, such as ADUs,
JADUs, tiny homes, or other (note: some of these typologies may meet
RHNA standards and some may not)?
8. In your opinion, how can the County’s RHNA of over 7,000 housing units
best be met?
9. Do you have any additional comments to share?
Questions and input received at the focus group included:
• How will the County be able to implement this feedback, ideas,
concerns, suggestions, primarily around funding? Will the County have
capacity to do the things that are said in the meeting?
• There is no such thing as affordable housing because it costs many
hundreds of thousands of dollars to construct a single unit. Affordable
housing unit production will not increase until the State steps in. The
State needs to take away the local control because California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) fees, local requirements, state
requirements, construction costs, etc. are very difficult and getting more
difficult.
• Land costs are so high because the supply is limited, like in places such
as Marin County. Is hopeful that new state legislation chipping away at
single-family zoning will be a start, but we know that these things take a
while to get going. Once it does though, it may put a dent in the millions
of housing units we are short in the state.
• For Question #7, interested in how they can support ADU construction
in the county, which they are doing in Oakland. Agrees that we as a state
need to address building costs before building affordable housing can
happen more quickly.
• For Question #2, have identified that the model of buildup to ownership
is nearly impossible (mentioned West Oakland experience), so being
able to acquire and remodel units is the most feasible for them to
create affordable home ownership situations.
• For Question #3, for the smaller infill developers, there is such limited
capacity to stay on top of everything, larger agencies are way more
equipped. Maybe the larger agencies can help the smaller companies, in
terms of providing technical assistance or talent staffing.
• There is an obstacle related to the lack of pre-development dollars to
get you to the point of development. Most jurisdictions don’t have pots
of money available for pre-development. Most money comes in at the
construction phase. They are always trying to get financing together for
the pre-development phase of the project. Multiple attendees agreed
with this input.
• Would like to have zoning to allow for micro-cottages. Some zoning will
need to match affordable by design dwelling units.
• There needs to be a way to make sure there is a way to go about
building non-commodified housing to ensure that people aren’t
displaced. There are no policies that support developers doing
preservation or rehabilitation of existing units. This will be key for
developers being able to preserve existing communities and housing
units.
6 -12 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• The Housing Element can also look at how public land can help ensure
equitable housing is being developed. There are a lot of scattered non-
contiguous sites out there and it would be nice for the County to
acquire or consolidate that land so that it is easier for developers to
acquire and develop on them.
• In some areas, market rent is affordable so in those cases they are
having a difficult time meeting requirements for having rents 10 percent
below market for even below 70 percent AMI units. They are trying to
maximize points to get tax credits, but the rents are not hitting the 10
percent delta to hit maximum points, so their rent surveys are imposing
further rent reductions on those units.
• Feasibility is also called into question if you’re building market-rate units
with affordable units. This came up on a site in Oakley. They are looking
at other potential sites and some jurisdictions have reached out asking
how to get more housing but they are not in a high resource area for
tax credit scoring. If they don’t reach 120 points, then they don’t get
state tax credits and the funds from other Bay Area cities require you to
be near transit to get funds (from Google, Apple, Facebook, etc.). The
areas where you can get enough funding are few and far between.
• Have had conversations with planning staff at a site for about 150
affordable units and the County came back asking if they could make it
more dense but the tax credit scoring is based on cost and their firm
can’t go more than three or four stories before the project would not
allow for funding based on density. They look at how to get projects
funded within the arena of complicated tax credits. While the Housing
Element might allow for density at 40-50 units per acre, in reality they
can only build maybe 35 units per acre to get a tax credit award.
• When the County is identifying Housing Element sites or prioritizing
sites, it would be great to keep the California Tax Credit Allocation
Committee (TCAC) scoring system in mind so they are close to
transportation, shopping, health amenities, and schools, because if they
don’t secure the amenity funds, they will not get funded or get a tax
credit authorization.
• Richmond LAND is anticipating the request for qualifications (RFQ) for
the Las Deltas project, and they will pursue those projects that will not
pursue any tax credits.
• The TCAC scoring comment is really important. Also, should look at
underlying zoning in those areas to try and pair up higher-density and
Multi-family zoning in areas close to amenities.
• Another thing that is challenging (for extremely low-income housing
development) is the lack of rental subsidies and funding in general. Have
done a number of projects in Walnut Creek because they have an
impact fee that generates funds for affordable housing. Concord has a
small program like this too. If there is an impact fee at the County level,
it would be incredibly helpful for developers to have funding to develop
more affordable housing, specifically the lowest-income affordable
housing.
• Richmond LAND had a meeting with Community Land Trust (CLT) Irvine,
which partnered with the County and did a below-market rate sale of a
housing site so they got that at a lower cost, and they are turning that
into a townhouse project that will be sold with a condo structure for 80
percent of AMI and will stay under the land trust. Travis Bank will be
doing the financing. Richmond LAND is having an issue with getting
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -13
lenders because they are trying to show them how their model works
and how it can be a safe investment for them.
• The affordable housing overlay or the streamlined General Plan and
zoning process would be really helpful.
• In unincorporated county, land is often not zoned correctly, and the
process for community outreach and changing zoning takes 17 months,
then 6 months for entitlement, then 9 to 12 months of permits. The
developer needs to carry the cost of an environmental impact report
(EIR) during this time, so you are looking at half a million dollars before
you can even guarantee you can do a project. Maybe there can be an
overlay in some areas where developers can get streamlined review, so
it is a lot faster? Oakley has this, they just do the design review, and it
has reduced the time and cost. This helps ensure that the landowners
will sell to them, and they don’t have to take out a high-interest land
loan. The overlay zone could make certain areas ”by-right” development
areas.
• With the increase Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) to
accommodate throughout the unincorporated county, racial equity
should be prioritized, especially in terms of displacement. Is the project
team thinking about how to frame the element around displacement, or
thinking about zombie properties, how can housing policy be leveraged
to prevent that?
• Has the County already submitted its Surplus Lands Act Inventory?
November 3, 2021, Service Provider Focus
Group
The service provider focus group took place on November 3, 2021. There
were 10 participants representing 14 organizations that attended. The
following discussion questions were posed to the focus group participants:
1. Who has the greatest need for housing in Contra Costa County in lower-
income and other vulnerable communities?
2. What services have been most successful in serving vulnerable
communities in Contra Costa County? What are those service providers
doing right?
3. What gaps in services for the homeless or other vulnerable lower-
income groups exist in Contra Costa County?
4. What are the biggest barriers to housing lower-income or vulnerable
communities?
5. What resources do housing service providers need to further help
lower-income and vulnerable populations in Contra Costa County?
6. Do you have any suggestions on policies or programs that the Housing
Element could have that would help service providers in Contra Costa
County?
7. Do you have any additional comments to share?
Questions and input received at the focus group included:
• Veterans are in a gray area because they have income coming in and
therefore don’t qualify for much assistance.
6 -14 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• For one provider’s homeless programming, they have a HUD Section 8
program for veterans that also comes with case management. They
have shelter beds, transitional housing, subsidies, mental health
programs, among others.
• The most vulnerable population they serve beyond veterans are veteran
seniors. Especially those who have poor credit or no credit who have no
other assistance. They have vouchers available, but they have
experienced issues with getting people to stay in homes.
• The main issue is more housing supply is needed.
• There is no low-barrier housing available out there. Low-barrier housing
is housing that does not need to consider credit or legal history (some
veterans aren’t eligible for housing because of low credit or because of
legal history or because they need housing references). Note that
housing references cannot include shelters, etc.
• A provider of services in permanent supportive housing in west county
reiterates the importance of prior comments. They serve people who
are chronically homeless and have challenging physical and/or
behavioral health issues or mental illness or substance abuse. They find
that when there are a lot of issues going on that are problems in terms
of housing stability, it is very difficult to get the level of care needed in
the system. There isn’t a continuum of services and housing that can
help people stabilize and get them back into housing.
• There are also not enough options for housing near services and not
enough housing that allows people to age in place.
• Doing housing first isn’t feasible, they have to focus on doing everything
they can to keep people in housing if it isn’t working out because they
have no available housing otherwise.
• A provider who oversees several shelters in the county sees a huge gap
in meeting housing needs for clients who are aging (and specifically have
cognitive decline). Something that is out of their scope of services at the
shelter is cognitive decline because they need long-term housing with
intensive care, and they don’t have resources to provide that care.
• Another population that has a very hard time getting housed are 290s
(registered sex offender) they often end up on the streets because of
the limited opportunities they have for housing.
• Single men often fall through the cracks because even with a job, th ey
cannot afford housing in the Bay Area because they are costed out, but
they also cannot find enough help to be able to get good housing.
• The 18- to 24-year-olds are often left out. They can’t be in shelters and
cannot get vouchers. Some people think that foster care money will
handle it, but they are often left out from a systemic standpoint.
• Agree, there definitely needs to be a coordinated effort to address the
needs of young people. How do we get everyone to the table to speak
with one another and work together?
• Wants to echo that there are these gaps in services for the youngest
and oldest. Younger people don’t qualify for much, if anything, and the
older ones need extensive help. He works with a rescue mission and
part of the work is to learn about other organizations so they can reach
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -15
out to other providers and see how to bridge gaps between different
agencies.
• People with mental illness don’t do well in big buildings where there are
a lot of people. Love the tiny home models where people have their own
places. Has had to try hard to get a place for veterans to have their own
small home and not be in a big building, for example placed on a single
family lot.
• When administering the rapid rehousing program keep getting referrals
for people who are needing housing, but they aren’t actually eligible.
They’re getting referrals for people who have really high needs that their
program cannot serve. They’re seeing families who need more than just
housing. The housing first model is sometimes designed as housing last
like all you need is housing. But so much more is needed to maintain
housing. We need to help people increase their income and their
organization doesn’t help with that as they are only able to help with
housing.
• Agrees that the housing first model is super difficult. We certainly need
to house people but if it’s not possible to get people an income due to
addiction, mental health, family issues, etc ., if you can’t address the root
of the problem then it’s a revolving door.
• Works most with veterans. Rapid rehousing is different for veterans.
While the name is the same, there are so many subsidies available to
them, they don’t need to have employment or good credit (it helps of
course) but veterans also get social security, veterans’ compensation,
and some other income sources and so they have more income help.
Housing first is a great idea, but it doesn’t work if it’s not sustainable.
• Wants to echo all the feedback so far. The Bay Area Rescue Mission has
been providing services and shelter and support through their mandate
from the gospel through working with people’s relationship to
themselves and god since 1965. They are committed to this mission and
agree with the points made that you can give anyone a home but if you
cannot provide them support, they will lose the housing again. The past
couple of years have seen a significant increase in dual diagnosis,
people with drug/alcohol addiction. There is so much that goes into
supportive services and providing context and community. Rapid
housing is not a long-term answer for these systematic problems.
• Has seen that there are so many barriers for families who do not have
access to any voucher programs. They tend to have some income, but it
isn’t enough for permanent housing, so they live in their cars. But
because they have “too much” income, they aren’t able to get enough
help to live in a home. They see families who have few barriers to getting
real housing (no mental illness or addiction). There needs to be a place
to identify who needs long-term housing, short-term housing, etc. so
that we can define what groups exist and how to place them. One
reason is that there is a dual-diagnosis requirement for some services.
Some people need things like assistance with security deposits, first and
last month’s rent, etc., but don’t need more deep services. How can we
help families whose barriers are “less” than others?
• One of the communities in greatest need is the aging homeless
community in the county. Seniors are losing their homes because their
income is flat.
6 -16 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• They are seeing people come to their shelters where they need lots of
help, they cannot supply through their services, and they have to turn
people away.
• There is also a huge lack of affordability in terms of housing options and
there is a lack of aftercare for people after they are housed.
• Also, people/families that are in a slightly higher-income bracket don’t
qualify for services due to income limits, but in reality, they still can’t
afford housing prices/costs in our area.
• Eviction history is also a big barrier to finding housing. An eviction on the
record is almost impossible to overcome.
• Seniors are rapidly becoming part of the unhoused.
• White supremacy is a huge issue, such as with redlining, types of
housing built, etc.
• As a provider, needs more from the system, still doesn’t feel like he is
part of a system that can get up stream and learn from each other to
see what works, what others are doing to work. They’re all a bunch of
islands in the ocean that aren’t connecting. Wishes that there was an in-
house team at the County that could help them grow as a system
together that is sustainable for the county and for them as providers.
This “systems” refers to everyone who services vulnerable populations . It
should have system measures like HUD does.
• All of the people at the focus group are service providers. What do we
do with this information? How do they change how they are currently
trying to serve all these different segments of the county population?
• Agree with all of the discussion so far. One solution is to increase In-
Home Case Management support to follow clients once housed (in the
right and sustainable housing placement).
• The Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) program is a great
model to follow but for it to work we need to reduce the restrictions on
accessing the funds and also need more funding to provide more long
term case management and of course housing stock.
• Housing development should occur near public transportation.
• Echoes everything said so far. Their approach to homelessness
prevention is more of a band-aid on an open wound where people
come for emergency rental assistance. We need to start addressing
homelessness, homeless prevention, and people who are couch surfing.
We need to address this on a holistic level and not just focus on
immediate solutions. Also, this isn’t one size fits all. Each person has
their own limitation. Her program offers assistance where they can help
people with first and last month rent or giving some furniture. All
organizations appear to do some of the things needed to solve these
issues but they’re all working on specific things. How do we bring
everyone together? How do they approach the issue as a group and as
a team so they can more thoroughly serve the community? Everyone
can take a part. Instead, they are leaving the vulnerable as vulnerable.
3. Community Meetings
The County held a community workshop for the Housing Element update on
Wednesday, February 9, 2022, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. via Zoom. County
staff and consultants facilitated the workshop and 35 residents and
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -17
interested persons attended and participated. The format for the workshops
was a presentation with an overview of the 6th-cycle Housing Element update
and the County’s approach and process, breakout sessions, and questions
and answers.
The breakout sessions were based on five different topics (1) Sites Inventory,
(2) Affordable Housing Funding, (3) Local Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
and State Density Bonus Law, (4) Other Housing Element strategies, and (5)
Fair Housing. There was a sixth breakout room reserved for Spanish -
speaking participants; however, no one in need of translation attended.
Participants were able to select their breakout room based on their topic of
interest. Facilitators engaged participants in the breakout sessions with
structured questions to share their knowledge, perspectives, and ideas.
In the Sites Inventory breakout session, participants were asked the following
questions:
1. What they think makes a site good for housing as opposed to other
types of land use? What do you think makes a good housing site suitable
for affordable housing, as opposed to market rate housing?
2. Do you have ideas for specific sites and suggestion for areas or
communities?
3. What are the challenges with including properties in a sites inventory?
Participants expressed that a good housing site is in proximity to resources
in an attractive and compatible environment. They proposed repurposing a
shopping center plaza, publicly-owned sites, and vacant school sites as
potential housing sites. Participants believed expected challenges for sites
include existing structures, hazards, environmental justice principles, and
differences in ideas and wants.
The Affordable Housing Funding breakout session participants were first
informed of the amount the County typically receives from state and federal
funding. From this, participants were asked the following questions:
1. Given this ongoing annual amount of $20 million, where should the
County prioritize funding of projects in unincorporated areas of the
county?
2. Should there be a mandatory city match?
3. How shold the County leverage our funding to maximize housing
production?
Most of the discussion in this breakout room was questions for the County
facilitator from participants. The participants had the following questions:
1. Why are we unincorporated, what is incorporated versus
unincorporated?
a. The facilitator responded and there was a discussion.
2. Why is only the unincorporated county responsible for all this housing?
Why aren’t cities responsible?
a. The facilitator responded that each jurisdiction in the state, including
all of the cities in Contra Costa County, also have a number of housing
units to plan for.
3. In regard to the $20 million, can it be used for preservation, acquisition,
and rehabilitation?
a. The facilitator responded that the best funding would be CDBG, not
sure if these funds can be used for those types of work. A certain
percentage might count toward the number.
6 -18 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
4. Is the County Housing Authority involved in these projects to combine
more funds and resources?
a. A discussion followed about possibilities of working together.
5. Where do these funds come from? We have a problem with mass
vacancies. Who holds the developer accountable, so the units are rented
and not vacant?
a. The facilitator noted that the County and the developer enter into a
regulatory agreement that determines who they rent to. Projects are
monitored to ensure units are leased to tenants who meet income
requirements.
6. Are all these funds to be used only in unincorporated Contra Costa?
a. The facilitator replied that no, these funds can be used in any part of
the county except for the inclusionary housing fund, which is just for
the unincorporated area of the county.
The Local Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and State Density Bonus Law
breakout session was structured around the following question:
1. What changes to the local Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would help
meet Housing Element goals?
Participants suggested both removing the in-lieu fees and considering raising
the fees. Participants recognized that higher-density multi-family housing can
not be built just anywhere; however, the County must look at sites where this
type of housing makes most sense given that lower-income housing is
lacking while there is a surplus of moderate and market -rate housing.
The Other Housing Element Strategies breakout session asked participants
the following questions:
1. What Housing Element strategies do you think we should keep?
2. What new strategies do you think the County should support?
3. What about implementing new state laws (e.g., Senate Bill 9?)
Participants shared that there is a great need to maintain a variety of existing
programs, including the anti-discrimination program, the residential
displacement program, and emergency rental assistance. Participants
proposed new strategies to increase the income spectrum for housing,
including developing a housing community land trust program, providing
financial assistance, repurposing underutilized commercial sites, and
providing public education to vulnerable populations.
The Fair Housing breakout session was initiated with the following questions:
1. Have you or a relative experienced any barriers to obtaining housing in
unincorporated Contra Costa County?
2. Have you or a family member or friend ever had to live in an
overcrowded unit to afford housing in unincorporated Contra Costa
County?
3. Can you easily change your housing situation if needed? If not, what
prevents that change? What would make relocating easier?
At least one participant in this breakout session explicitly shared that they
have faced barriers to obtaining housing and/or lived in an overcrowded unit
in unincorporated Contra Costa County. Participants shared that the
County’s current fair housing issues include gaps in access to services,
challenges in securing housing for those with negative rental records due to
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -19
evictions, and inequitable geographical distribution of affordable housing. To
make housing more accessible, participants suggested improving community
outreach and participation, acknowledging and remedying historic policies
and practices that uphold housing inequities, like segregation, developing
tenant protections, and being accountable for the progress of local fair
housing policies in the county.
After the breakout sessions, participants rejoined the larger group and were
directed to share their questions and comments through Zoom’s chat
feature. The City staff received and answered questions during the meeting
as time allowed. Participants were provided the County’s contact information
in the case they had additional questions or comments.
4. Public Hearings
The County presented about the Housing Element update at the December
7, 2021, Board of Supervisors meeting. Staff and the consultant provided an
overview of the Housing Element, updates on state housing law, and the
RHNA allocation. The presentation of the item was to initiate the discussion
of the Housing Element with the Board and the community and to answer
any questions about the process.
Written comments were received ahead of the meeting from East Bay for
Everyone. They commented on challenges and opportunities related to
housing in the unincorporated county; the draft General Plan land use maps
related to patterns of inequality; they suggested including a substantially
greater number of units/sites than called for in the RHNA ; described issues
they saw with the consultant, PlaceWorks’, work in southern California; noted
State law regarding small and large sites suitable for meeting the lower-
income RHNA; the suitability of Alamo Shopping Plaza as a Housing Element
site; provided suggestions related to Alamo, Castle Hill, Diablo, Blackhawk,
and Unincorporated Walnut Creek, specifically density decontrol, equal
upzoning in low and high income areas, SB 9 compliance, rezoning of
properties where horse stables are located to allow high-density multi-family
housing, gas stations, upzoning neighborhoods with racial covenants still
existing in CC & Rs, upzoning on church properties; also provided
suggestions related to specific sites for additional housing; and suggested
some potential Housing Element policies.
During the meeting, which was held on Zoom, eight attendees provided
comments on the Housing Element item. Comments and questions were
also received from the supervisors. Comments are summarized below.
Board of Supervisors Comments
• What is the General Plan update schedule?
• Could the County amend the Housing Element again with the rest of the
General Plan?
• Policies and actions throughout the General Plan are interrelated.
• More density in lower-income communities than higher-income
communities.
• What are other communities in the County saying about the Draft
General Plan Land Use maps?
• Would like to see buildout broken out by community.
• The RHNA number seems impossible.
• There are lots of competing factors.
6 -20 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Interested in SB 9. Is it beneficial to meet the RHNA on sites where units
could actually be built?
• More infrastructure is needed in east county, including roads and water.
Highway 4 is so congested. These are quality of life issues. Jobs are also
needed in this area in addition to transportation improvements.
• Every community should have a complete mix of housing. Should house
everyone from those who work at a doctor’s office to janitors.
• San Ramon has a good jobs-housing balance.
• Be careful in the very high fire severity zone.
• Doesn’t agree that historic communities can’t accommodate more
density.
• Would like to look at projects that have received in -lieu funding over the
last decade – which projects paid the in-lieu fee rather than build on-site
inclusionary units.
Public Comments
• Referenced letter submitted by East Bay for Everyone. Current
proposed General Plan Land Use maps are a failure.
• Affirmatively furthering fair housing is not just for the Housing Element
it is for the whole General Plan and other land use activities .
• The current proposed General Plan Land Use maps focus housing in
polluted areas.
• Alamo, Parkmead (unincorporated Walnut Creek), and other areas have
a lot of potential for housing due to their larger parcel size.
• North Richmond is one of the most polluted places in California.
• Alamo has good environmental quality.
• The County historically has been very segregated. The draft General
Plan land use maps perpetuate bad patterns.
• Mentioned Mauzy School.
• Is the vision document going for abundance or shortage?
• What qualifies as good planning? Making it possible to live in as many
places as they want?
• Don’t put housing in fire zones.
• Facilitate transit so there are more places for housing.
• Grew up in Walnut Creek. Has seen almost entire high school class
priced out of the area.
• Should allow more dense housing in single-family areas.
• Appreciates a comment from County staff that Diablo is small and
unique with limited access.
• Diablo historic district should be preserved. Multiple commenters had
this comment.
• Doesn’t want more density on East Diablo Road corridor.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -21
• Diablo is a more dangerous evacuation situation than Paradise,
California.
• Thinks there is no more single-family residential proposed in Diablo.
• County should analyze development potential under SB 9.
5. Input Received Through General Plan
Update Outreach
Through the larger Envision Contra Costa 2040 General Plan Update process
that is underway, the County obtained additional input on housing-related
needs in the county. This process has included over 100 public and semi-
public meetings with community members, stakeholders, and public officials,
most of which covered the topic of housing to varying degrees, as described
below:
• Since March 2019, the County has held over 40 meetings focused on
unincorporated communities to discuss community-specific issues. At
these meetings, many community members expressed the need for
more affordable housing in a variety of densities/housing types that is
not concentrated in specific communities and neighborhoods. They also
called for housing that is accessible to transit and other important
services, like grocery stores. Residents would like the County to support
non-traditional forms of housing that can increase affordability, like tiny
homes and ADUs, and suggested that the County inventory vacant
and/or public land that is available for affordable housing development.
They would like the County to increase availability of housing-related
programs, like first-time homebuyer programs. They also consistently
called for more action to shelter and provide needed services to
unhoused people, while also avoiding gentrification and displacement.
• In May 2019, the County held three open houses, one each in the west,
east, and central parts of the county. The purpose was to hear from
residents about key issues that will be addressed through the Envision
Contra Costa 2040 project, including mobility, housing, environmental
justice, community health, economic development, and safety and
resiliency. The two-hour meetings were organized in an open house
format to allow residents to participate at their own pace. At the sign-in
table, attendees were provided with an informational handout about
Envision Contra Costa 2040, a worksheet, and a comment card. The
worksheet corresponded with six stations placed around the room with
boards presenting key background information on each topic. Each
station was staffed by a facilitator who recorded comments from the
participants, answered questions, and sought feedback to gauge
community perspective on these issues.
Open house participants at the housing station reported that housing
challenges generally stem from high rental costs, housing inequity, and
strict permitting requirements that increase new construction costs.
Residents felt that supportive housing for people with mental illnesses,
accessible housing for disabled people and seniors, and low-income
housing were in especially short supply. They recommended that the
County promote ADUs, tiny homes, smaller lot sizes, “age-in-place”
housing, and multi-family housing to address these issues. Participants
also indicated that the County should encourage rent control, fair
housing law practices, and a balanced jobs to housing ratio. Residents
also suggested that the County address homelessness by focusing on
6 -22 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
mental health services and supporting a variety of housing types,
including transitional, supportive, and affordable mobile units.
• Between November 2019 and February 2021, the County conducted
five meetings focused on the topic of environmental justice, which
included the subtopic of access to safe and sanitary housing. During
these meetings, participants expressed that preserving and expanding
affordable housing in disadvantaged communities is important.
Furthermore, participants would like to see tenants’ rights be protected
and avoid future displacements or rent hikes for residents living in these
communities. Participants requested that policies call out a diverse set
of options for alternative forms of affordable housing. Participants also
recommended that the County partner with a range of agencies on
housing-related policies and actions. Residents think that there needs to
be zero-interest financing for low-income and disadvantaged
community residents who need air conditioners, solar panels, and other
equipment. Residents advised the County to prioritize infill residential
development to help preserve the character of their neighborhoods.
Participants also suggested there be robust policy guidance about
meeting the housing needs of homeless individuals.
Through the Envision Contra Costa 2040 process, the County has also held
nine meetings with the Sustainability Commission, eight meetings with the
Planning Commission, five meetings with the Board of Supervisors
Sustainability Committee, and meetings with all 13 Municipal Advisory
Councils, during which housing issues were discussed in the context of the
General Plan. Further, County staff met with over 20 community-based
organizations reflecting a range of community interests in the county,
including housing.
6. Relationship to the General Plan
The 2023-2031 Housing Element is a key component of the County’s General
Plan. The County of Contra Costa adopted its General Plan in 1991 (and
made some updates in 2005) which includes the following elements: Land
Use; Growth Management; Transportation and Circulation; Housing; Public
Facilities/Services; Conservation; Open Space; Safety; and Noise. The County
is currently partway through a comprehensive General Plan update. All of the
other elements of the General Plan are currently being updated for
consistency with recent updates to State law, including those related to
environmental justice, wildfires, and hazards. Internal consistency between
the Housing Element and other elements will be confirmed through the
comprehensive update.
After adoption of the comprehensive General Plan update, the County will
ensure consistency between General Plan elements so that goals and
policies introduced in one element are consistent with other elements. If it
becomes apparent that over time, changes to any element are needed for
internal consistency, such changes will be proposed for consideration by the
Planning Commission and County Board of Supervisors.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-236.2 Housing Needs AssessmentThis section analyzes the demographic, socioeconomic, housing characteristics, and market data of Contra Costa County and the unincorporated county to determine the nature and extent of housing needs for current and future residents.The data sources used to compile the Housing Needs Assessment include the 2020 Census, the 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimate conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, the California State Department of Finance (DOF), and supplemented with current market data and secondary sources of information. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) prepared a data package that was approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for use in ABAG Housing Elements. It is noted in the data source at the bottom of tables in this section where this data package was used.A. POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS1. Population TrendsContra Costa County is the ninth-most populous county in California, with approximately 1,153,561 residents per the 2020 DOF population estimates. 104,536 new residents have arrived in the county (a 9-percent increase) since 2010. Contra Costa County projects that the county will have 1,224,400residents by 2030 and 1,338,400 by 2040 (see Table 6-1). The DOF estimated the 2020 population of the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County was 174,257, representing an increase of 10 percent since 2010, tracking with the increase in the county as a whole. In Table 6-1, the 2010 and 2020 population and population projections for 2030 and 2040 for unincorporated Contra Costa and the entire county are shown.TABLE 6-1 POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONSGeography20102020Projected2030Projected2040PercentageChange between 2010 and 2040Total Unincorporated159,785174,257173,500182,500+14.2%Total County1,049,0251,153,5611,224,4001,338,400+27.6%Data Source: California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties,and the State — January 1, 2011-2021. Sacramento, California, May 2021. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).When looking at the demographic profile of the unincorporated area as a whole, it is fairly similar to the entirety of Contra Costa County, but trending a little older and Whiter than the county as a whole. However, the unincorporated communities vary significantly in terms of key demographic characteristic, such as racial/ethnic composition, age, and sex. Table 6-2shows housing tenure by household type (owners versus renters) and Table 6-3 shows race and ethnicity in the unincorporated county.Between 2000 and 2019, the White population decreased by 26.2 percent, and the Black or African American population decreased by 14.3 percent. The Hispanic or Latino population increased by 58.8 percent, the Asian population increased by 40 percent,and the “other” population category increased by 400 percent.
6-24 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementA community’s current and future housing needs are partly determined by the age characteristics of residents. Typically, each age group has distinct lifestyles, family type and size, incomes, and housing preferences. As people move through each stage of life, their housing needs and preferences also change. As a result, evaluating the age characteristics of a community is important in determining the housing needs of residents.Table 6-4 provides the age characteristics of residents in the unincorporated portion of the county. Between 2010 and 2019, the largest percentageincrease in age groups was for the 65 to 74 age group. The second-largest percentage increase was in the 75 to 84age group, highlighting a greying population. A high proportion of young adults generally indicates a need for rental units and first-time homebuyers or first move-up opportunities, including condominiums, town homes, or single-family homes. Middle-age residents typically occupy larger homes and are usually at the peak of their earning power. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) show that senior residents (age 62 and older) in unincorporated Contra Costa County are mostly homeowners, with 86 percent owning homes and 14 percent renting(see Table 6-2). TABLE 6-2 HOUSING TENURE BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYMarried-Couple House-holders Living AloneFemale-Headed House-holdsMale-Headed House-holdsOther non-Family House-holdsSeniorsTotal Owner Occupied28,2517,6253,8091,9121,95814,68758,24248.5%13.1%6.5%3.3%3.4%25.2%100.0%Renter Occupied7,3184,7472,9391,1131,8702,45620,44335.8% 23.2% 14.4% 5.4% 9.1% 12.0% 100.0%For data from the Census Bureau, a “family household” is a household where two or more people are related by birth, marriage, or adoption. “Non-family households” are households of one person living alone, as well as households where none of the people are related to each other. For the purposes of this table, senior households are those with a householder who is aged 62 or older. Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25011 and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).Nationwide trends, however, indicate that as the baby boom generation ages, the demand for move-down housing or specialized residential developments, such as assisted-living facilities or active adult communities, will continue to grow. Input from service providers who work with seniors in the unincorporated county confirms this assumption.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-23TABLE 6-3 RACE AND ETHNICITY IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYYearPercentage WhitePercentage Hispanic or LatinoPercentage AsianPercentage Black or African AmericanPercentage Other*200065%17%10%7%1%201055%23%12%6%4%201948%27%14%6%4%% Change between 2000 and 2019-26.2%+58.8%+40.0%-14.3%+400.0%* Includes American Indian, Native Alaska, Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islanders, 'other' race, and persons of two or more races.Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Table P004; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B03002 (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).TABLE 6-4 POPULATION BY AGE IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYAge Group20102019Percentage Change between 2010 and 2019Age 0-49,3949,355-<1%Age 5-1421,86422,907+4.7%Age 15-2419,45121,393+9.9%Age 25-3418,01920,937+16.1%Age 35-4421,31323,860+11.9%Age 45-5426,88125,750-4.2%Age 55-6422,13225,447+14.9%Age 65-7412,27916,975+38.2%Age 75-846,0737,887+29.8%Age 85+2,3792,983+25.3%TTotal 159,7855 177,4944 +11.0%% Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 SF1, Table P12; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B01001 (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).
6-24 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element2. Employment TrendsEmployment has an important impact on housing needs. Different jobs and income levels determine the type and size of housing a household can afford. Employment growth in the region also typically results in an increase in housing demand, particularly in areas that function as a “bedroom community.” Contra Costa County has a fairly fast-growing workforce, with growth in its employment base driven primarily by the need to provide health, education, and professional services to an increasing local population. Between 2010 and 2020, there was a 13.7-percent increase in employment in unincorporated Contra Costa County, and there is a projected 16-percent increase in employment between 2010 and 2040 in unincorporated Contra Costa County. ABAG expects that Contra Costa County will continue to provide “bedroom communities” for the workforce of other Bay Area counties. The county is expected to gain an estimated 65,530 more employed residents than jobs between 2020 and 2040. ABAG estimates that unincorporated Contra Costa County will add approximately 2,850 new jobs between 2020 and 2040. Table 6-5 shows employment trends in Contra Costa County between 2010 and 2040 projections.TABLE 6-5 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH TRENDS AND PROJECTIONSGeography20102020Projected2030Projected2040PercentageChange between 2010 and 2040Total Unincorporated*69,89078,37078,80081,220+16%Total County455,540526,530552,720592,060+30%Data Source: ABAG’s Plan Bay Area 2040 (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).Table 6-6 shows the types of occupations held by residents in unincorporated areas and the county as a whole. According to the ACS, the two largest occupational categories for both the county and unincorporated areas were “Health & Educational Services” and “Financial & Professional Services.” These categories accounted for 28.1 and 25.8 percent of employed residents in the county’s unincorporated areas, respectively. Relatively higher-paying jobs are in both categories, except for certain sales positions, translating into higher incomes for the residents engaged in these activities.TABLE 6-6 EMPLOYMENT PROFILEOccupations of ResidentsUnincorporated CountyTotal CountyPersonsPercentagePersonsPercentageAgriculture & Natural Resources7350.8%3,7200.7%Construction7,4818.6%39,9967.2%Financial & Professional Services22,52125.8%138,32124.7%Health & Educational Services24,64328.1%174,99031.3%Information2,2432.6%14,0482.5%Manufacturing, Wholesale & Transportation13,11215.0%79,88514.3%Retail8,95710.2%56,65110.1%Other7,7718.9%51,7559.3%Total 87,463 100% 559,366 100% Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table C24030.(ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).Table 6-7 details the 2021 Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics for jobs in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Wages range from the low end in food service (average $38,872 annually) to the high wages of management
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-25occupations (average $158,446).1Contra Costa County’s major employers include finance, government, medical, and heavy industry, as shown in Table 6-9. There are also significant service sector jobs.TABLE 6-7 WAGE STATISTICS FOR ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIESOccupational TitleMean Annual WageFood Preparation and Serving$38,872Healthcare Support $40,799Farming, Fishing, and Forestry$42,154Personal Care and Service$42,532Building and Grounds Maintenance$48,311Transportation and Material Moving$48,835Production Occupations$51,926Office and Administrative Support$55,056Sales$59,555Community and Social Service Occupations$68,136Educational Instruction and Library$70,691Protective Services$71,366Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations$77,908Construction$79,163Business and Financial Operations$97,088Life, Physical, and Social Science$103,059Architecture and Engineering$109,102Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations$121,183Computer and Mathematical Occupations$124,151Legal Occupations$146,544Management $158,446Data Source: These survey data are from the 2020 Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey. The wages have all been updated to the first quarter of 2021 by applying the US Department of Labor's Employment Cost Index to the 2020 wages.1https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/oes-employment-and-wages.htmlTABLE 6-8 MAJOR EMPLOYERSEmployer NameLocationEmployee Size ClassIndustryBroadspectrum AmericaRichmond500-999Oil Refiners (manufacturers) C&H Sugar CoCrockett500-999Sugar Refiners (manufacturers) Longs Drug StoreWalnut Creek500-999Drug Millers (manufacturers)Los Medanos CollegePittsburg500-999Junior-Community College-Tech InstitutesMartinez Arts Outpatient ClinicMartinez500-999Surgical CentersNordstromWalnut Creek500-999Department StoresOakley Union School DistrictOakley500-999School DistrictsRobert Half IntlSan Ramon500-999Employment Agencies & OpportunitiesSan Ramon Regional Medical CenterSan Ramon500-999HospitalsSanta Fe Pacific Pipe LinesRichmond500-999Pipe Line CompaniesShell Oil Prod US MartinezMartinez500-999Oil & Gas ProducersSutter Delta Medical CenterAntioch500-999HospitalsUS Veterans Medical CenterMartinez500-999Outpatient ServicesChevron Research & TechnologySan Ramon5,000-9,999Service Stations-Gasoline & OilChevronSan Ramon10,000+Oil Refiners (manufacturers)
6-26 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementEmployer NameLocationEmployee Size ClassIndustryBARTRichmond1,000–4,999Transit LinesBio-Rad LaboratoriesHercules1,000–4,999Physicians & Surgeons Equip & Supplies-manufacturersChevron Richmond RefineryRichmond1,000–4,999Oil Refiners (manufacturers) Contra Costa Regional Med CenterMartinez1,000-4,999HospitalsJohn Muir Health Concord Concord1,000-4,999HospitalsKaiser Permanente Antioch Antioch1,000-4,999HospitalsKaiser Permanente Martinez Martinez1,000-4,999ClinicsKaiser Permanente Walnut CreekWalnut Creek1,000-4,999HospitalsLa Raza MarketRichmond1,000-4,999Grocers-RetailUSS Posco IndustriesPittsburg1,000-4,999Steel Mills (manufacturers)Data Source: California Employment Development Department (2021)Contra Costa County, WCCUSD, MDUSD???Based on 2020 data from Contra Costa County, a total of 526,530 Contra Costa County residents were in the labor force, with the unemployment rate estimated at 7.7 percent. Given this estimate is based on a five-year average and recent employment growth, the actual unemployment rate is anticipated to be lower than 7.7 percent. According to the State Employment Development Department, the unemployment rate in the county was 6.7 percent in July 2021. Table 6-9shows the employment trends and projections by countywide, unincorporated county, and individual cities.TABLE 6-9 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS – CONTRA COSTA COUNTYArea Name2010202020302040Unincorporated County69,89078,37078,80081,220Antioch40,90047,11048,55051,190Brentwood19,36021,91022,21023,050Clayton4,9605,4705,4205,400Concord57,23064,96074,46085,510Danville18,24020,41020,45020,970El Cerrito11,36012,87013,07013,590Hercules11,74015,08017,00019,330Lafayette10,33011,77012,01012,540Martinez17,11019,08019,09019,570Moraga6,4707,3307,4407,730Oakley14,18017,93019,96022,470Orinda6,9707,8407,9108,170Pinole8,2809,4909,75010,240Pittsburg26,09031,86034,50037,940Pleasant Hill16,00017,90017,95018,460Richmond42,49050,68053,83058,280San Pablo11,46013,43014,05015,010San Ramon32,82038,06039,47041,870Walnut Creek29,66034,98036,80039,520CContraa Costaa Countyy -- TTotal 4455,540 5526,530 5552,720 5592,060 Data Source: ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-27B. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICSIncome level and cost burden are key factors in determining the type of housing needed by the residents of unincorporated Contra Costa County. This section details the various household characteristics affecting housing needs. The Census defines a “household” as any group of people occupying a housing unit, including single persons living alone, families related through marriage or blood, or unrelated persons that share living quarters. Table 6-10 shows that in unincorporated Contra Costa County, 20.1 percent of the households are single persons living alone, 58 percent are families, and 21.9percent are unrelated persons sharing living quarters. Persons living in retirement or convalescent homes, dormitories, or other group living situations are not considered households. Household characteristics are important indicators of the type and size of housing needed in a community.TABLE 6-10 HOUSEHOLD TYPEGeographyFemale -Headed Family HouseholdsMale – Headed HouseholdsMarried – Couple Family HouseholdsOther Non-Family HouseholdsSingle – Person House-holdsTotalUnincorporated Contra Costa County6,748 3,025 35,569 3,828 12,372 61,54211.0% 4.9% 57.8% 6.2% 20.1% 100.0%Contra Costa County48,256 19,180 217,370 23,731 86,232 394,76912.2% 4.9% 55.1% 6.0% 21.8% 100.0%Bay Area283,770 131,105 1,399,714 242,258 674,587 2,731,43410.4% 4.8% 51.2% 8.9% 24.7% 100.0%Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B11001. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).HCD publishes area median incomes on an annual basis, based on HUD data. The goal of the Housing Element is to accommodate the needs of all households across all income groups. The median income for a Contra Costa household of four in 2021 is $125,600. Table 6-11 shows income levels for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate incomes in the county. Table 6-12 shows housing tenure (owner- versus renter-occupied households) by geographic area and Table 6-14 shows workers by earnings for unincorporated Contra Costa.TABLE 6-11 2021 INCOME LEVELS – CONTRA COSTA COUNTYHousehold sizeExtremely lowVery lowLowModerate1$28,800$47,950$76,750$105,5002$32,900$54,800$87,700$120,5503$37,000$61,650$98,650$135,6504$41,100$68,500$109,600$150,7005$44,400$74,000$118,400$162,750Data Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2021. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).
6-28 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementTABLE 6-12 HOUSING TENUREGeographyOwner OccupiedRenter OccupiedTotalUnincorporated Contra Costa43,55517,98761,54270.8%29.2%100.0%Contra Costa County260,244134,525394,76965.9%34.1%100.0%Bay Area1,531,9551,199,4792,731,43456.09% 43.91% 100.0%Data Source:U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25003. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).TABLE 6-13 WORKERS BY EARNINGS, BY JURISDICTION AS PLACE OF WORK AND PLACE OF RESIDENCE - UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTAEarnings GroupPlace of ResidencePlace of WorkLess than $9,9998,6674,877$10,000 to $24,99912,6506,348$25,000 to $49,99919,35610,169$50,000 to $74,99912,6567,339$75,000 or more31,83215,587TTotals 85,1611 44,3200 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data 2015-2019, B08119, B08519. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).1. Existing Households by Income and TenureIn 2019, the countywide median income was approximately $99,700. However, homeowners earn a median income of $122,227 – or about 86 percent higher than the renter median income of $65,583 (Table 6-11). As is the case for many communities, renter households are most predominant in income levels below $75,000; homeowners are most predominant in the higher-income groups. Income is the most important factor affecting the housing opportunities available to a household, determining the ability to balance housing costs with other basic necessities of life. Housing choices, such as tenure (owning versus renting), and location of residence are very much income-dependent. In the unincorporated county, approximately 13.2 percent of the households are extremely low income, as defined by HUD (households earning 30 percent or less of median family income (MFI). ABAG projects an increase in the population of 9.8 percent between 2020 and 2040. Presuming extremelylow-income households continue to be 13.2 percent of the population, then by 2040, there will be 25,256 extremely low-income households in the unincorporated area. Table 6-14 shows the breakdown of households in the unincorporated county by income and tenure. Table 6-15 shows household size by tenure.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-29TABLE 6-14 HOUSING BY TENURE AND INCOME - UNINCORPORATED COUNTYHousing TypeExtremely Low-IncomeHouseholdsVery Low-IncomeHouseholdsRental4,6013,031Ownership3,5913,993TTotal88,192((113.2%%)77,024((111.3%%)Data Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 releaseTABLE 6-15 HOUSEHOLD SIZE BY TENURE - UNINCORPORATED COUNTYGroupOwner OccupiedRenter OccupiedTotal1-Person Household7,6254,74712,3722-Person Household16,1754,64920,8243-Person Household7,4293,18710,6164-Person Household6,967 2,982 9,9495 or More Person Household5,359 2,422 7,781Totals 43,5555 17,9877 61,542 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25009. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).2. Overpaying for HousingBecause of the high cost of housing in the Bay Area, many households overpay for housing. According to HUD, households should spend less than 30 percent of their income on housing, including utilities, taxes, and insurance. However, an estimated 19.8 percent of the households in Contra Costa County have a cost burden of more than 30 percent. Approximately 15.1 percent have a cost burden of 50 percent or more. Table 6-16 outlines the cost burden by income level in the unincorporated county.TABLE 6-16 COST BURDEN BY INCOME LEVEL - UNINCORPORATED COUNTYIncome Group0%-30% of Income Used for Housing30%-50% of Income Used for Housing50%+ of Income Used for Housing0%-30% of AMI 1,4411,3674,63331%-50% of AMI 2,3682,3722,26151%-80% of AMI3,5182,3931,20381%-100% of AMI3,1571,595486Greater than 100% of AMI 28,3764,466731Totals 38,860 12,193 9,314 Data source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 releaseC. HOUSING STOCK CHARACTERISTICSThis section of the Housing Element addresses various housing characteristics and conditions that affect the living environment of residents. Housing factors evaluated include housing stock and vacancy rates, tenure, age and condition, housing costs and affordability, and overcrowded households.1. Housing Type and TenureIn 2020, single-family homes and multi-family dwelling units made up approximately 79.7 percent and 15.9 percent of the housing stock of the unincorporated county, respectively. According to the U.S Census Bureau’s ACS 5-year estimates (2015-2019), the homeownership rate in unincorporated Contra Costa was 71percent; 29 percent of homes were
6-30 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementrenter-occupied (Table 6-17). Table 6-18 summarizes various characteristics of the housing stock in unincorporated areas of the county.TABLE 6-17 HOUSING TENURE GeographyOwner OccupiedRenter OccupiedUnincorporated Contra Costa County43,555 17,987Contra Costa County260,244 134,525Bay Area1,531,955 1,199,479Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25003. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).TABLE 6-18 HOUSING STOCK IN 2021 IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYHousing TypeNumber of Units% of TotalSSingle--Familyy 51,6966 79.7%% Detached48,66975.1% Attached3,0274.7%Multi-familyy 10,3199 15.9%% 2-4 Units2,7114.2% 5+ Units7,60811.7%Mobilee Homes/Other 2,8166 4.3%% Totall Units 64,8311 100%% Data Sources: California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2011-2021. Sacramento, California, May 2021.2. Vacancy RatesVacancy rates are a useful indicator of the housing market’s overall health and ability to accommodate new residents within the existing housing stock. Table 6-19 outlines vacancy rates by tenure according to the 2015-2019 ACS.The ACS 5-year estimates for 2015-2019 indicate the countywide vacancy rate is an estimated 4.6 percent. The unincorporated county had a slightly higher vacancy rate (5.8 percent). The increase can be attributed to a higher percentage of recreational/occasional use units in unincorporated areas of the county, such as Bethel Island and Discovery Bay. As shown in Table 6-20, the vacancy rate was higher in the unincorporated county (26.1 percent) for homes in the seasonal or ocassional use category compared to the countytwide rate (11.5 percent) and the Bay Area rate (21.6 percent). TABLE 6-19 OCCUPANCY STATUSGeographyOccupied Housing UnitsVacant Housing UnitsVacancy RateUnincorporated Contra Costa 61,542 3,806 5.8%Contra Costa County394,76918,9504.6%Bay Area2,731,434172,6605.9%Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25002. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).Of the 3,806 vacant housing units in unincorporated Contra Costa, 357 units are for rent, 563 units are for sale, 130 units are rented but not occupied, and 166 units are sold but not occupied. There are also 992 units that are for seasonal or occasional use. See Table 6-20for a breakdown of vacant units by type in unincorporated Contra Costa County, Contra Costa County, and the greater Bay Area.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-31TABLE 6-20 VACANT UNITS BY TYPEGeographyFor RentFor SaleFor Seasonal or Occasional UseOther VacantRented, Not OccupiedSold, Not OccupiedTotalUnincorporated Contra Costa357 563 992 1,598 130 166 3,8069.4% 14.8% 26.1% 42.0% 3.4% 4.4% 100.0%Contra Costa County4,321 2,012 2,188 8,469 741 1,219 18,95022.8% 10.6% 11.5% 44.7% 3.9% 6.4% 100.0%Bay Area41,117 10,057 37,301 61,722 10,647 11,816 172,66023.8% 5.8% 21.6% 35.7% 6.2% 6.8% 100.0%Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25004. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).3. Housing Age and ConditionHousing age is an important indicator of housing condition within a community because, like any other tangible asset, housing is subject to gradual physical or technological deterioration over time. If not properly and regularly maintained, housing can deteriorate and discourage reinvestment, depress neighboring property values, and eventually impact the quality of life in a neighborhood. Thus maintaining and improving housing quality is an important goal for the County.A general rule in the housing industry is that structures older than 30 years begin to show signs of deterioration and require reinvestment to maintain their quality. Unless properly maintained, homes older than 50 years require major renovations to remain in good working order.
6-32 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementThe 2011 American Housing Survey found that in the Oakland/Fremont Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), an estimated 15,200 residential units had severe2physical problems, and 30,200 had moderate3physical problems. Unincorporated Contra Costa County has an estimated 6.4 percent of the total housing units in the Oakland/Fremont MSA. Therefore, an estimated 2,906 units have severe or moderate physical problems. The American Housing Survey estimates that an additional 22,000 occupied housing units may have other rehabilitation needs such as missing roofing material, holes in the roof, cracks in the foundation, or broken/boarded windows. More recent ACS and American Housing Survey data are unavailable at the MSA or more specific scale. Per an interview with the county Building Department in December 2021, approximately 20 residential units per year in the unincorporated county are not inhabitable and are in imminent need of replacement.Table 6-21 provides a breakdown of the housing stock in unincorporated areas of the county by the year built.2A unit has severe physical problems if it has any of the following five problems: Plumbing. Lacking hot or cold piped water or a flush toilet, or lacking both bathtub and shower, all inside the structure (and for the exclusive use of the unit, unless there are two or more full bathrooms). Heating. Having been uncomfortably cold last winter for 24 hours or more because the heating equipment broke down, and it broke down at least three times last winter for at least 6 hours each time. Electric. Having no electricity, or all of the following three electric problems: exposed wiring, a room with no working wall outlet, and three blown fuses or tripped circuit breakers in the last 90 days. Hallways. Having all of the following four problems in public areas: no working light fixtures, loose or missing steps, loose or missing railings, and no working elevator. Upkeep. Having any five of the following six maintenance problems: (1) water leaks from the outside, such as from the roof, basement, windows, or doors; (2) leaks from inside structure such as pipes or plumbing fixtures; (3) holes in the floors; (4) holes or open cracks in the walls or ceilings; (5) more than 8 inches by 11 inches of peeling paint or broken plaster; or (6) signs of rats in the last 90 days. 3A unit has moderate physical problems if it has any of the following five problems, but none of the severe problems: Plumbing. On at least three occasions during the last 3 months, all the flush toilets were broken down at the same time for 6 hours or more (see “Flush toilet and flush toilet breakdowns”). Heating. Having unvented gas, oil, or kerosene heaters as the primary heating equipment. Kitchen. Lacking a kitchen sink, refrigerator, or cooking equipment (stove, burners, or microwave oven) inside the structure for the exclusive use of the unit. Hallways. Having any three of the four problems listed above. Upkeep. Having any three or four of the six problems listed above in “upkeep.” See also “Bars on windows of buildings,” “Common stairways,” “Equipment,” “External building conditions,” “Flush toilet and flush toilet breakdowns,” “Heating equipment and heating equipment breakdowns,” “Overall opinion of structure,” “Primary source of water and water supply stoppage,” “Water leakage during last 12 months,” “Selected deficiencies.TABLE 6-21 HOUSING AGE-YEAR BUILT BY TENURE IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYYear BuiltNumber of Units% of Total Occupied UnitsBuilt 1939 or earlier4,6847.2%Built between 1940 - 195915,65424.0%Built between 1960 - 197917,78827.2%Built between 1980 - 199918,22927.9%Built between 2000 - 20096,80910.4%Built 2010 or later2,1843.3%TTotall Units 665,348 1100.0% Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25034.(ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).Based on the data on housing age, there is a strong likelihood that many homes will require reinvestment or renovations to ensure the housing stock is maintained in good working order. That is because roughly 60 percent of
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-33the housing stock was built before 1980 and another 28 percent was built between 1980 and 1999. The Department of Conservation and Development currently offers the Neighborhood Preservation Program, which provides zero and low-interest loans for the rehabilitation of housing owned and occupied by lower-income households in the unincorporated areas. 4. Housing Costs and AffordabilityThe cost of housing is directly related to the extent of housing problems in a community. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, there will be a correspondingly higher prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding. This section summarizes the cost and affordability of the housing stock to county residents. Sales and Rental DataHome sales prices vary significantly by location in Contra Costa County. Tables 6-22 and 6-23 show the results of a point-in-time sales and rental survey from October 2021. Home prices are generally higher in the central sub-region than in the east and west sub-regions. Condominiums or townhomes are typically more affordable than single-family homes and represent alternative homeownership opportunities, especially for low- and moderate-income households. Like home sales prices, rental rates also vary by size and location of the units. The vacancy rate in unincorporated Contra Costa County was 5.8percent, as compared to 4.6 percent in the county, and 5.9 percent for the Source: Codebook for the American Housing Survey, Public Use File: 1997-2011, March 2013 Bay Area (see Table 6-20). This trend indicates a tightening of the rental market. As long as vacancy rates remain below 5.0 percent, rents are likely to continue increasing.TABLE 6-22 2021 MEDIAN SALES PRICES IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYHousing TypeNumber of BedroomsEastWestCentralMedian PriceMedian PriceMedian PriceCondos1 $238,000 $269,500 N/A2 $515,000 $385,000 $425,0003 $467,500 N/A $510,0004 N/A N/A N/A5+ N/A N/A N/ASingle-Family Residential1 $502,500 $385,112 N/A2 $532,500 $700,000 $242,50003 $639,999 $750,000 $2,322,5004 $750,000 $7,480,00 $2,400,0005+ $799,000 $780,000 $2,525,000Townhomes1N/AN/AN/A2 $775,000$415,000$661,5003 $775,000$520,000$2,200,0004N/AN/AN/A5+ N/AN/AN/ASource: Redfin, October 2021.East includes Bay Point, Bethel Island, and Discovery Bay. West includes Montalvin Manor, Crockett, East Richmond Heights, El Sobrante, Kensington, North Richmond, Rodeo, and Tara Hills. Central includes Vine Hill, Pacheco, Diablo, Blackhawk, and Alamo.N/A: Not Available. There were no listings that matched the number of bedrooms for that housing type.
6-34 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementTABLE 6-23 MEDIAN RENTS IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY*Number of Bedrooms1 Bedroom2 Bedrooms3 BedroomsMonthly Rent$1,691 $2,280 $4,200*This represents the range of median rents across Unincorporated County. Data Source: RealPage.com and Zillow.com from October 2021Table 6-24 shows rental costs in the Unincorporated County, Contra Costa County and the Bay Area based on a survey of listings that ranged in size from two to four bedrooms. As shown in Table 6-12, about 29.2 percent of Unincorporated County’s households are renters. Typically, renters tend to live in multifamily units, the overall housing stock for the Unincorporated County is 14.9 percent multifamily and about 79.7 percent single family. Based on the stock, single family units may be used for renting. According to Real Page and Zillow in October 2021, the median rent for a 2 bedroom was $2,280 while a 3 bedroom was $4,200. According to Table X, in 2019, about44.0 percent of households paid between $1,500 – $2,500 for rent. Additionally, according to the 2015-2019 ACS, between 2009 and 2019, the rent increased annually by 3.6 percent in the Unincorporated County, 4.5percent in Contra Costa County and 5.5 percent in the Bay Area. Overall,rental trends in the Unincorporated Contra Costa County show a steadyincrease in price with the majority of households paying rents for 1- 2 bedroom units.TABLE 6-24 RENTAL PRICE RANGESGeographyRent less than $500Rent $500-$1000Rent $1000-$1500Rent $1500-$2000Rent $2000-$2500Rent $2500-$3000Rent $3000 or moreUnincorporated Contra Costa4.1% 11.3% 26.6% 25.9% 18.8% 7.0% 6.2%Contra Costa County5.4% 10.1% 23.9% 29.8% 17.5% 7.5% 5.8%Bay Area6.1% 10.2% 18.9% 22.8% 17.3% 11.7% 13.0%Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25056. (ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).5. Housing Affordability by HouseholdIncomeHousing affordability can be inferred by comparing the cost of renting or owning a home in the county with the maximum affordable housing costs to households at different income levels. Taken together, this information can generally show who can afford what size and type of housing and indicate the type of households most likely to experience overcrowding or a housing cost burden. In evaluating affordability, the maximum affordable price refers to the maximum amount that a household in the upper range of their respective income category can reasonably pay based on state income limits for the county. Households in the lower end of each category can afford less in comparison. Table 6-25 shows the annual income for extremely low-, verylow-, low-, and moderate-income households by household size and the maximum affordable housing payment based on the state and federal
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-35standards of 30 percent of household income. Cost assumptions for utilities, taxes, and property insurance are also shown. The income and housing cost figures in Table 6-25 determinethe maximum affordable home price and rent.. The affordable housing prices and rents can be compared to current market prices for single-family homes, condominiums, and apartments to determine what types of housing opportunities a household can afford.Extremelyy Low-Incomee Households:: Extremely low-income households earn 30.0 percent or less of the county median family income. Given housing costs in Contra Costa County, extremely low-income households cannot afford any homes or apartments at market rates. Affordable housing for such households is generally limited to housing offered by the HousingAuthority of Contra Costa County and non-profit housing providers. The County Board of Supervisors adopted a policy requiring housing developed with County subsidy to target some units to be affordable to extremely low-income households. The County HOME and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) subsidized projects generally have 10.0 percent of the units at this level. However, some extremely low-income households are people experiencing homelessness or at risk of experiencing homelessness. These households may be under-employed or living on social security income. The Housing Authority provides additional housing opportunities through public housing, housing choice vouchers, and HUD Shelter + Care. Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) funds a rental subsidy program. Veryy Low-Incomee Households: Very low-income households earn 50.0percent or less of the county median family income. Given the relatively high costs of single-family homes and condominiums in the county, the housing choice of very low-income households is generally limited to the rental housing market. As shown in Table 6-23, average apartment rents in the county are $1,691 for a one-bedroom unit, $2,280 for a two-bedroom unit, and $4,200 for a three-bedroom apartment (RealPage.com and Zillow.com, October 2021). Rents are higher in Central County than in East or West County. After deductions for utilities, a very low-income household can only afford to pay between $1,250 and $1,929 in rent per month, depending on the household size. In practical terms, this means that a one-person household cannot afford an average-priced one bedroom without overpaying. A very small number of one-bedroom units may be affordable to very low-income households in some areas of the county. Low-Incomee Households:Low-income households earn 80.0 percent or less of the county’s median family income. The maximum affordable home purchase price for a low-income household ranges from $360,686 for oneperson to $556,420 for a five-person family.A low-income household can afford to pay between $1,919 and $2,960 in rent each month, depending on household size. A low-income person and small low-income family households can theoretically afford a one-bedroom condo in selected communities. A low-income single person can afford the rent of a one-bedroom apartment. A small low-income family household can theoretically buy a low-end one-bedroom single-family house in West or East County. Central County remains largely unaffordable to low-income households.Moderate-Incomee Households:Moderate-income households earn 81.0 to 120.0 percent of the county’s median family income. The maximum affordable home price for a moderate-income household ranges from $563,704 for a one-person household to $869,641 for a five-person family.With a maximum affordable rent payment of between $2,999 and $4,626per month, moderate-income households can afford many of the units listed for rent.
6-36 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementTABLE 6-25 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY MATRIX (2022)Income GroupIncome Levels Monthly Housing Costs Maximum Affordable Price Annual Income Affordable Payment2 Utilities Own/Rent Taxes & Insurance3 Ownership4 Rental5 Extremelyy Low One Person $30,000 $750 $150 $1,998 $133,935$600 Small Family1 $38,600 $965 $225 $2,342 $ $740 Large Family $46,300 $1,158 $300 $2,649 $188,743 $858 Veryy Low One Person$50,000 $1,250 $150 $2,797 $234,974 $1,100 Small Family$64,300 $1,608 $225 $3,369 $302,177 $1,383 Large Family$77,150 $1,929 $300 $3,882 $362,566 $1,629 Low One Person$76,750 $1,919 $150 $3,866 $360,686 $1,769 Small Family$98,650 $2,466 $225 $4,741 $463,605 $2,241 Large Family$118,400 $2,960 $300 $5,530 $556,420 $2,660 Moderate One Person$119,950 $2,999 $150 $5,591 $563,704 $2,849 Small Family$154,200 $3,855 $225 $6,960 $724,661 $3,630 Large Family$185,050 $4,626 $300 $8,192 $869,641 $4,326 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release; HCD 2022 Income Limits.Notes: 1. Small Family = three persons; Large Family = five or more persons 2. Monthly affordable payment based on payments of no more than 30% of household income 3. Property taxes are based on the average rate for Contra Costa County of 0.85%, and insurance is based on Zillow AffordabilityCalculator assumptions. 4. Affordable home price is based on down payment of 20% of annual household income, annual interest of 5.375%, a 30-year mortgage, and monthly payment of 30% of gross household income.5. “Maximum Affordable Price, Rental” assumes tenant pays utilities. For a rental that includes the cost of utilities, maximum affordable price is shown in the column, “Affordable Payment.” Maximum affordable home prices are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be used for determining specific program eligibility.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-376. Overcrowded HouseholdsTo avoid extraordinary housing costs, many lower-income households rent smaller apartments or live with friends or relatives to economize on housing costs. For the purposes of this report, overcrowding is defined as households with more than one occupant per room.Overcrowding can be either moderate or severe. Moderate overcrowding is 1.01 to 1.5 persons per room, and severe overcrowding refers to more than 1.5 persons per room. Housing overcrowding is a regional issue due to the lack of housing production versus demand, though local housing market factors and local socioeconomic issues influence the rate of overcrowding.Table 6-26 shows that 3.2 percent of unincorporated county households are considered moderately overcrowded, and 1.4 percent of households are considered severely overcrowded. These percentages are similar to the county as a whole, where 3.5 percent of households are considered moderately overcrowded, and 1.5 percent of households are severely overcrowded. TABLE 6-26OVERCROWDING SEVERITYGeography1.00 occupants per room or less1.01 to 1.50 occupants per room1.50 occupants per room or moreTotalUnincorporated Contra Costa58,7241,97884061,54295.4%3.2%1.4%100.0%Contra Costa County374,72613,9506,093394,76994.9%3.5%1.5%100.0%Bay Area2,543,056115,69672,6822,731,43493.1%4.2%2.7%100.0%Data Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 releaseD. SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSISCertain groups have greater difficulty in finding decent, affordable housing due to their special needs or circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one’s employment and income, family characteristics, disability, and household characteristics, among others. As a result, certain segments of residents in Contra Costa County may experience a higher prevalence of lower incomes, housing cost burden, overcrowding, or other housing problems. “Special needs” groups include the following: senior households, mentally (including developmentally disabled) and physically disabled persons, large households, single-parent households (female-headed households with children in particular), unhoused persons, and agricultural workers. This section provides a detailed discussion of the housing needs facing each particular group and programs and services available to address their housing needs. Determining the housing issues of special-needs groups is easier than defining the magnitude. The US Census Bureau’s ACS 5-year estimates (2014-2018 ) is the most current data available and the primary source used to estimate the size of a particular group. Recent information from service providers and government agencies is used to supplement the ACS data. Table 6-27 summarizes the special-needs groups residing in unincorporated areas of the county.
6-38 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementTABLE 6-27 SPECIAL-NEEDS GROUPS IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTYSpecial-Needs GroupPersonsHouseholdsPercentage of Unincorporated CountySeniors (65 years and older) ---17,14327.8%Owners ---14,68733.7%Renters ---2,45613.6%Disabled 19,743---11.3%Developmentally Disabled 1,430---0.8%Single-Parent Households 9,77315.8%Large Households ---7,78112.6%Owners ---5,3598.7%Renters ---2,4223.9%Agricultural Workers 1,310---0.7%Unhoused Persons 2,277---N/AData Sources: Seniors: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 releaseDisabled: Table S1810 Developmentally Disabled: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B18102, Table B18103, Table B18104, Table B18105, Table B18106, Table B18107.Single Parent Households: Table B11001 Large Households: Table B25009 Agricultural Workers: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Census of Farmworkers (2002, 2007, 2012, 2017), Table 7: Hired Farm Labor Unhoused Persons: ABAG and Contra Costa County Homeless Count have differing estimates. Unhousednumber is for the entire County, and not just the unincorporated area. This may represent an undercount—please refer to discussion on the unhoused in Section 7 below.(ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021). 1. Senior HouseholdsSenior households have special housing needs primarily due to three major concerns – physical disabilities/limitations, income, and health care costs. According to the CHAS data (2013-2017), 27.8 percent (17,143) of households in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County wereheaded by seniors, defined as persons 65 years and older. Some of the special needs of seniors are as follows: xLimited Income - Many seniors have limited income available for health and other expenses. According to CHAS 2013-2017, because of their retired status, 30.0 percent of elderly households in unincorporated Contra Costa County are extremely (30 percent of AMI) or very low (30 to 50 percent of AMI).xDisabilities - Of the senior population, 32.4 percent have a disability limitation. Because of physical and/or other limitations, senior homeowners may have difficulty carrying out regular home maintenance or repair activities.xCost Burden - Because of an increasing supply of affordable rental housing and low to no mortgage payments, 14.5 percent of senior households in the county experience housing cost burden.Various programs can address the special needs of seniors, including, but not limited to, congregate care, supportive services, rental subsidies, and housing rehabilitation assistance. For the frail elderly, or those with disabilities, housing with architectural design features that accommodate disabilities can help ensure continued independent living. Elderly with mobility/self-care limitations also benefit from transportation alternatives. The Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging has adopted Best
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-39Practice Development Guidelines for Multi-Family Senior Housing projects. These guidelines provide a framework to help guide the planning, design, and review of new senior housing developments in the county. The guidelines are an information tool for local community groups, architects, planners, and developers. Senior housing with supportive services can be provided for those who require assistance with daily living.Social and supportive services are available in Contra Costa County through various agencies and organizations, including the County Area Agency on Aging and John Muir Senior Services Program. Multiple service providers offer an array of assistance, including Alzheimer’s service programs, respite care, day programs, addiction services, financial assistance, and Meals on Wheels. The County Area Agency on Aging, in particular, offers information services for seniors on a variety of topics, including health, housing, nutrition, activities, help in home, employment, legal matters, transportation, financial or personal problems, paralegal advice, day activities for the disabled, and health screening.2. Disabled Persons Physical, mental, and/or developmental disabilities may prevent a person from working, restrict one’s mobility, or make it difficult to care for oneself. Thus, disabled persons often have special housing needs related to potentially limited earning capacity, the lack of accessible and affordable housing, and higher health costs associated with a disability. Some residents suffer from disabilities that require living in a supportive or institutional setting.The U.S. Census Bureau defines six types of disabilities: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, and independent living difficulties. According to the ACS, a total of 5,000 persons with disabilities resided in the unincorporated county areas, representing approximately 2.8 percent of the population. Countywide, persons with disabilities are more likely to live below the poverty line. The median wage for a disabled worker is $31,327 versus $48,691 for a non-disabled person.Persons with developmental disabilities may have communication and learning disorders and may have a harder time learning basic life skills. A more in-depth analysis is provided in Section 3. The living arrangement of disabled persons depends on the severity of the disability. Many live at home independently or with other family members. To maintain independent living, disabled persons may need assistance. This can include special housing design features for the disabled, income support for those who are unable to work, and in-home supportive services for persons with medical conditions among others. Services are typically provided by both public and private agencies.Independent Living Resources (ILR), an area non-profit organization, is dedicated to helping people with any disability live everyday, independent lives. Services include accessibility services, assistive technology, information and referral, attendant referral, advocacy, housing assistance, and peer counseling services for persons with disabilities. ILR also offers advocacy services, which aim to maintain or increase access to services, benefits, and other social services. ILR advises clients regarding their rights under Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1972 for disabled individuals. ILR’s housing referral services assist clients by maintaining a registry of accessible, adaptable, affordable apartments and houses, information on how to adapt
6-40 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementa living environment to a disabled individual's needs, and assistance obtaining a low-income housing subsidy.However, there is a scarcity of appropriate housing for persons with disabilities. There is a need for more accessible, adaptable, and affordable housing. The County requires that all newly constructed housing using federal funds include 5 percent of the units to be accessible to the physically impaired and an additional 2 percent accessible to hearing and vision impaired. Federally funded rehabilitation projects must include accessibility improvements to the extent practicable. Due to the non-standard design and construction requirements, accessible units are more expensive to construct. In addition, the disabled tenants generally have incomes well below the extremely low-income limits. Therefore, they need extremely low rents or rent subsidies. The combination of higher construction costs and lower rent revenues require greater subsidies to provide these units. Housing choice is further limited because to mitigate the higher construction costs and lower rents, developers typically want to provide only one-bedroom units. This makes it difficult for a disabled individual with a live-in caregiver, or a family unit, to find suitable housing.ILR of Contra Costa County and Solano County assists disabled residents in getting past housing barriers such as accessibility issues, high costs, and discriminatory pratices. ILR provides information and education to help disabled residents navigate homeownership and renting. Even with these efforts, there is still a shortage of housing affordable to those whose income is limited to state and federal assistance programs. The County’s Neighborhood Preservation Program makes accessibility improvements to owner-occupied homes.The County has provided HOME funds to several projects in the county for disabled populations. The most recent projects include Heritage Point (North Richmond), Aspen Court (Pacheco), and Rodeo Gateway (Rodeo) . The County Health Services Department, in cooperation with the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD), uses MHSA funds to support permanent supportive housing. Transportation service for persons with disabilities is available through the regional transportation agencies, including County Connection LINK, East Bay Paratransit Consortium, Tri-Delta Transit Dial-A-Ride, and WestCAT Dial-A-Ride. Under these programs, door-to-door and dial-a-ride paratransit services are offered to individuals with disabilities.3. Developmental Disabilities Senate Bill 812, which took effect in January 2011, amended the State housing element law to require an evaluation of the unique housing needs of persons with developmental disabilities. A “developmental disability” is defined as a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual. Developmental disabilities include mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism. This term does not include solely physical disabilities. There are a significant number of persons with developmental disabilities who also require adaptations in their housing to address physical disabilities. Most developmentally disabled persons can live and work independently within a conventional housing environment. More severely disabled individuals may require a supervised group living environment. Historically, the most severely affected individuals lived in an institutional environment where on-site medical attention and physical
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-41therapy were provided. Many adults living in institutional settings have recently transitioned to community-based housing and services. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first housing issue forthe developmentally disabled is the transition from living at home with a parent/guardian as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult. As of January 2019, The State Department of Developmental Services (DDS) provides community-based services to approximately 346,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers, four developmental centers, and two community-based facilities. The Regional Center of the East Bay (RCEB) serves Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. RCEB works in partnership with many individuals and other agencies to plan and coordinate services and support for people with developmental disabilities. A community-based Board of Directors, which includes individuals with developmental disabilities, family members,and community leaders, provides guidance and leadership.In addition, the Housing Consortium of the East Bay (HCEB) provides housing outreach and support services; develops affordable housing, partners with other nonprofit and for-profit companies to secure set-asides within larger rental communities,and owns and operates special-needs affordable housing. HCEB staff, in partnership with the Regional Center of the East Bay, provided housing need support for individuals with developmental disabilities in Contra Costa County. By age, the estimated unincorporated developmentally disabled individuals are as follows: from 0 to 18 years, 727 individuals, and over age 18, there are 703 individuals. This total of 1,430represents less than one percent of the unincorporated population.There are a number of housing types appropriate for people living with a development disability: licensed and unlicensed single-family homes, Housing Choice vouchers (Section 8), and affordable housing with rent restrictions may all be appropriate options. Unless an individual is able to receive significant subsidies, homeownership is not a viable option in Contra Costa County. Considerations for housing siting and development include proximity to transit and services, and physical accessibility to the unit. The County will continue to support housing developments and opportunities such as these:xMagnolia House in Lafayette for older adults – owned by Las Trampas, Inc.xABC Apartments in El Sobrante – owned by California Autism FoundationxArboleda Apartments in Walnut Creek – owned by Satellite Affordable Housing Associates4. Single-Parent Households Because of their relatively lower incomes and higher living expenses, single-parent households are more likely to have difficulty finding affordable, decent, and safe housing. These households often require special consideration and assistance as a result of their greater need for affordable housing, accessible day care/childcare, health care, and other supportive services necessary to balance the needs of their children with work responsibilities.An estimated 9,773 single-parent families lived in the unincorporated areas of the county according to the 2015-2019 ACS, representing 15.8 percent of all households (Table 6-10). Countywide, there were a total of 67,436 single-parent families, comprising 12.2 percent of all households in the county. Single-mother families still represent the majority (71.5 percent) of all single-
6-42 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementparent families countywide, with an increasing number of single fathers struggling to balance work and childcare. Supportive services for single- and low-income mothers are available through various non-profit organizations in the county, including Brighter Beginnings, Contra Costa Crisis Center (211database.org), and others. In addition, the County’s Health Services Department offers many programs through its Family, Maternal & Child Health, and Community Wellness sections.Battered women with children comprise a sub-group of single-parent households that are especially in need. In Contra Costa County, the largest agency serving victims of domestic violence is STAND! For Families Free of Violence. STAND! provides 24 emergency beds to battered women and their children in Contra Costa. STAND! also provides a variety of services to victims of domestic violence, including a crisis line, legal advocacy, employment assistance, and a batterer’s treatment program. The County’s Alliance to End Abuse is a public/private partnership designed to reduce domestic violence, family violence, sexual assault, elder abuse, and human trafficking in Contra Costa County. The Alliance’s objectives are implemented through a comprehensive, coordinated, and community-wide approach that interrupts the progressive cycle of violence. The Alliancedevelops and delivers direct services through its partners and advances policy change. 5. Large HouseholdsLarge households are defined as those consisting of five or more members. These households comprise a special-need group because of the often limited supply of adequately sized, affordable housing units in a community. To save for other basic necessities, such as food, clothing, and medical care, it is common for lower-income large households to reside in smaller units, which frequently results in overcrowding. An estimated 7,781 large households lived in the unincorporated area, 31.1 percent (2,422) of which were renter households.The housing needs of large households are ideally met through larger units. According to the ACS 5-year estimates, the unincorporated areas in the county had 43,555 owner-occupied and 17,987 renter-occupied units. However, many of these units are single-family homes and are expensive; they are not likely to be occupied by lower-income renter households. Therefore, overcrowding is more prevalent among large renter households.To address overcrowding, communities can provide incentives to facilitate the development of affordable apartments with three or more bedrooms to meet the needs of large households. Oftentimes, the shortage of large rental units can be alleviated through the provision of affordable ownership housing opportunities, such as condominiums coupled with homeownership assistance and self-help housing (through Habitat for Humanity and other similar organizations). Also, Section 8 rental assistance provided by the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County (HACCC) can enable large families to rent units they otherwise cannot afford.The HACCC currently manages 1,168 public housing units for families in the county. With a total of 248 units for families, Bayo Vista in Rodeo is the largest public housing development in the unincorporated areas.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-436. Agricultural WorkersIn 2019, the total gross value of agricultural products and crops in Contra Costa County was $106 million, a significant increase since 2012 when the gross value was estimated at $90 million (in 2012 dollars). According to the 2017 Census of Agriculture, 602 farms were operating in Contra Costa County, the majority (73.2 percent) of which were less than 50 acres in size(see Table 6-28).Agricultural workers are traditionally defined as persons whose primary incomes are earned through permanent or seasonal agricultural labor. Permanent farm laborers work in the fields, processing plants, or support activities generally year-round. When the workload increases during harvest periods, the labor force is supplemented by seasonal labor, often supplied by a labor contractor. For some crops,farms may employ migrant workers, defined as those whose travel distance to work prevents them from returning to their primary residence every evening. Determining the actual size of the agricultural labor force is problematic because the government agencies that track farm labor do not consistently define farmworkers (e.g., field laborers versus workers in processing plants), length of employment (e.g., permanent or seasonal), or place of work (e.g., the location of the business or field).TABLE 6-28 FARM LABOR IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTYLength of Employment2002200720122017Permanent730 578 509 450Seasonal*1,874 1,295 1,540 860TTotal 2,6044 1,8733 2,0499 1,3100 Data Sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Census of Farmworkers (2002, 2007, 2012, 2017), Table 7: Hired Farm Labor.* Farm workers are considered seasonal if they work on a farm less than 150 days in a year, while farm workers who work on a farm more than 150 days are considered to be permanent workers for that farm.(ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021).According to the 2017 Agricultural Census, 1,310 workers were employed on farms in Contra Costa County, which is less than the 2,049 workers employed on farms in Contra Costa County in 2012. Based on discussions with various agencies, the County understands that the majority of the farmworker population in the unincorporated areas consists of resident-households requiring permanent affordable housing rather than migratory workers with seasonal housing needs. Contra Costa County’s agricultural land is predominately located in far east Contra Costa County.Farmworkers are generally considered to have special housing needs because of their limited income and the seasonal nature of their employment. While no local survey is available that documents the specific housing needs of farm labor in Contra Costa County, the Bureau of Labor Statistics states the median hourly wage for agricultural workers in 2020 was $13.98 per hour ($28,900 per year).
6-44 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementUnder the County’s Zoning Code, farmworker housing is permitted in the agricultural zoning districts (A-2, A-3, A-4, A-20, A-40, and A-80). Action HE-A7.6 is included in the Housing Plan to address full compliance with the Employee Housing Act for households of six or fewer.To meet the housing needs of farmworkers, the County has provided CDBG and/or HOME funding for various developments in East County that provide affordable homeownership and rental opportunities for extremely low- and very low-income households, including many farmworker families. The County recognizes the importance of providing affordable housing to the farmworker population.7. Unhoused Persons The County Health Services Department (HSD) develops plans and programs to assist people experiencing homelessness throughout Contra Costa County. In 2014, the County published an update to the “Ending Homelessness in Ten Years: A County-Wide Plan for the Communities of Contra Costa County” (Ten Year Plan). The 2014 “Forging Ahead Towards Preventing and Ending Homelessness” plan aims to provide permanent housing and prioritize prevention through coordinated assessments, performance standards, and communication.The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness, appointed by the Board of Supervisors, provides advice and input on services, program operations, and program development efforts in Contra Costa County for unhoused people. The Council on Homelessness establishes the local process for applying, reviewing, and prioritizing project applications for funding in HUD Homeless Assistance Grant Competitions, including the Continuum of Care (CoC) Program and the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program. The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness provides a forum for the CoC to communicate about implementing strategies to prevent and end homelessness.In January 2020, the County Homeless program staff, coordinating with Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCICH), conducted a count of people and families experiencing homelessness. This count identified 2,277 unhoused people throughout the county. Of those, 707 were sheltered, and 1,570 individuals were without shelter. Of the 2,277 unhoused, 217 were counted in unincorporated areas of the county. Due to the transient nature of unhoused people and the sometimes difficult to determine borders between the cities and county, it is difficult to precisely determinehow many of the unhoused people are from, or sleeping in, the unincorporated county. Additionally, based on 2021 data from Contra Costa County Health, Housing & Homeless Services about persons living in the unincorporated county accessing services through the CoC for calendar year 2020, patterns of service are shown. Out of the 7,102 households served, 27 lived in the unincorporated county.Under the County’s Zoning Code, emergency shelters and transitional housing designed to meet the needs of those experiencing homelessness or formerly unhoused people are permitted in all residential zones subject to a land use permit. In addition, these facilities are allowed in most commercial and industrial districts with a land use permit. Emergency shelters are permitted without a conditional (land) use permit or other discretionary action within the “C,” General-Commercial Zoning District. See Table 6-29 for an inventory of facilities with available beds in the county.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-45TABLE 6-29 CONTRA COSTA HOMELESS FACILITY INVENTORYFacility NameRegionTarget PopulationTotal Year-Round BedsIInterimm Housingg (Emergencyy SShelters)) Bay Area Crisis NurseryConcordYoung children, 0 to 5 years20Bay Area Rescue MissionRichmondFamilies with children63Calli House Youth ShelterRichmondTransition-age youth15Concord & Brookside Adult Interim Housing, including Special Needs, Veteran, and Respite Concord and RichmondSingle men & women (152) veterans, and medically fragile (31 beds)160East County ShelterAntiochSingle men & women20GRIP Emergency ShelterRichmondFamilies with children75Mountain View HouseMartinezFamilies with children25Rollie Mullen CenterConfidentialDomestic Violence24Winter Nights ShelterVariousMixed0Transitionall Housing Bissell CottagesRichmondTransition Aged Youth8Contra Costa Trans HousingN/AN/A73Discovery HouseMartinezSubstance Abuse Recovery40Maple HouseN/ASingle Women4MOVEConfidentialDomestic Violence22Pittsburg Family CenterPittsburgFamilies with children20Project IndependenceRichmondTransition Aged Youth25REACH PlusScattered SiteMixed86Shepherd’s GateBrentwoodWomen with Children25Transitional HousingRichmondMixed19Veteran Transitional HousingN/AVeterans12
6-46 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFacility NameRegionTarget PopulationTotal Year-Round BedsPPermanentt Housing ACCESSScattered SiteSingle men and women88Garden Parks ApartmentsPleasant HillHIV/AIDs, Small families29Giant Road ApartmentsSan PabloSingle men and women86Hope SolutionsRichmondSingle men and women152HUD VASHScattered SiteVeterans180Idaho ApartmentsRichmondSingle men and women4Lakeside ApartmentsConcordSingle men and women122Mary McGovern HouseConcordSingle men and women13Permanent ConnectionsScattered SiteSingle men and women24Project Coming HomeScattered SiteSingle men and women42Shelter Plus CareScattered SiteMixed413Transitional Housing PartnershipScattered SiteMixed34Transitional Living ApartmentsWest Contra Costa CountyHomeless Youth13Villa VasconcellosWalnut CreekSenior men and women70West Richmond ApartmentsRichmondSingle men and women4Data Source: Contra Costa County Homeless Program, 2014; updated 2021
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-47As a means to help meet the special needs of the unhoused, the Contra Costa Crisis Center operates a 24-hour hotline (211 Contra Costa) that connects unhoused individuals and families to resources available in the county, including housing, job training, substance abuse treatment, mental health counseling, emergency food, healthcare, and other services.HSD provides emergency and transitional shelter and supportive services designed to enable unhoused persons to achieve greater economic independence and a stable living environment. HSD coordinates the activities of and provides staff support to CCICH, which consists of representatives from local jurisdictions, homeless service providers, advocacy and volunteer groups, the business and faith communities, residents at large, and previously or currently unhoused persons.E. LOSS OF ASSISTED HOUSING Affordability covenants and deed restrictions are typically used to maintain the affordability of publicly assisted housing, ensuring that these units are available to lower- and moderate-income households in the long term.Periodically, the county faces the risk of losing some of its affordable units due to expiration of covenants and deed restrictions. As the tight housing market continues to put upward pressure on market rents, property owners are more inclined to discontinue public subsidies and convert the assisted units to market-rate housing.El Sobrante Silvercrest is a 179-unit senior complex in El Sobrante, and Park Regency is an 892-unit family complex in unincorporated Walnut Creek. They are atrisk of converting to market rate within ten years of the beginning of the Housing Element planning period, or 2033. El Sobrante Silvercrest receives HUD funding to allocate 134 units for lower-income families. ThePark Regency development allocates 49 affordable units for lower-income seniors in exchange for assistance through the County tax-exempt bond program. The affordability restriction on El Sobrante Silvercrest is set to expire in 2032 and for Park Regency in 2022. The analysis below provides the options for preserving and/or replacing the affordable units in the two complexes. Table 6-30 lists all assisted projects with terms with expiration dates for the government subsidies in the unincorporated County.Preservationn andd Replacementt Options:To maintain the existing affordable housing stock, the County must either preserve the existing assisted units or replenish the affordable housing inventory with new units. Depending on the circumstances of at-risk projects, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. Preservation options typically include: (1) transfer of project to non-profit ownership; (2) providing rental assistance to tenants using non-federal funding sources; (3) issuing tax-exempt bonds for refinancing; and (4) facilitating the purchase of affordability covenants. With regard to replacement, the most direct option is the development of new assisted multi-family housing units. These options are described herein, specifically in relation to the preservation/replacement of at-risk units in El Sobrante Silvercrest and Park Regency.Transferr off Ownership:Transferring ownership of an at-risk project to a non-profit housing provider is generally one of the least costly ways to ensure that the at-risk units remain affordable for the long term. By transferring property ownership to a non-profit organization, low-income restrictions can be secured for 55 years, and the project would become potentially eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance. There are a number of non-profit housing providers in Contra Costa that would be suitable candidates to receive the transfer ownership of the affordable units in El Sobrante Silvercrest and Park
6-48 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementRegency. Examples of qualified entities are well-established non-profit housing providers active in Contra Costa County, including BRIDGE Housing Corporation (San Francisco), Resources for Community Development (Berkeley), Eden Housing, Inc. (Hayward), and Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (Berkeley), which could be suitable candidates for the transfer of ownership. Two-bedroom multi-family units (condos) in Contra Costa County have been selling for an average of $441,666 across areas of the county in 2021 (see Table 6-22). Assuming an average sales price, acquisition of 121 units would equate to $80,825,000.Rentall Assistance:Rental subsidies using non-federal (state, local, or other) funding sources can be used to maintain affordability of the 183at-risk units. These rent subsidies can be structured to mirror the federal Section 8 program. Under Section 8, HUD pays the difference between what tenants can pay (defined as 30 percent of household income) and what HUD estimates as the fair market rent on the unit.The feasibility of this alternative is highly dependent on the availability of non-federal funding sources necessary to make rent subsidies available and the willingness of property owners to accept rental vouchers if they can be provided. Table 6-30 shows the rental subsidies required to preserve at-risk units. The calculations assume that extremely low-income households would be the likeliest recipients of rental subsidies.They also are based on the fact that El Sobrante Silvercrest has studio and one-bedroom units, and Park Regency has units ranging from studios to two bedrooms. The distribution of unit sizes within each project is an estimate. The total cost for rental subsidies would range from $339 to $733 per unit per month, which equates to $1,079,004annually.TABLE 6-30 POTENTIAL RENT SUBSIDIESPer Unit Affordable RentStudio11 Bedroom22 Bedroom3Very Low Income (50% AMI) (A)$1,199$1,370$1,541Per-Unit Fair-Market Rent (B)$1,538$1,854$2,274Monthly Per-Unit Subsidy (C=B-A)$339$484$733Annual Subsidy/Unit (C*12)$4,068$5,808$8,796Totall “Att Risk”” Units 68 7045 Totall Annuall Subsidy $276,624 $406,560 $395,820 Source Data: HCD 2022 Income Limits; HUD 2022 Fair Market Rents for Contra Costa County1. Assumes 1-person household paying 30 percent of household income on rent and utilities.2. Assumes 2-person household paying 30 percent of household income on rent and utilities.3. Assumes 3-person household paying 30 percent of household income on rent and utilities.Tax-Exemptt Bondd Refinancing:An effective way to preserve the affordability of the 49 low-income restricted units in El Sobrante Silvercrest under the bond program is to refinance the remaining mortgage on the project. When refinanced, the project would be required by the 1986 Tax Reform Act to commit its 20-percent low-income units for the greater of 15 years or as long as the mortgages are outstanding. The costs to refinance the project would include the difference in interest rates on the remaining debt between the previous and renegotiated loan packages, an issuance cost to be paid up front by the County, and administrative costs. To provide the property owner with an incentive to refinance, the County may be able to refinance the project with a new tax-exempt bond issue at an interest rate lower than
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-49the rate on the initial bond. Other assistance, such as rehabilitation loans or grants, may also be available.PPurchasee off Affordabilityy Covenants:Another option to preserve the affordability of the at-risk project is to provide an incentive package to the owner to maintain the project as affordable housing. Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan balance, and/or supplementing with a Section 8 subsidy received to market levels. By providing lump sum financial incentives or ongoing subsidies in rents or reduced mortgage interest rates to the owner, the County can ensure that some or all of the units remain affordable.Constructionn off Replacementt Units:The construction of new low-income housing units is a means of replacing the at-risk units should they be converted to market-rate units. The cost of developing housing depends on various factors, including density, size of the units (i.e., number of bedrooms), location, land costs, and type of construction. The average construction cost for a residential rental unit is approximately $427,000 (including land costs), based on assessments from recent multi-family developments in the county. Based on this estimate, it would cost approximately $78 million to develop 49 new assisted units should El Sobrante Silvercrest convert to market rate.Costt Comparisons:The transfer of ownership of El Sobrante Silvercrest or Park Regency to non-profit housing providers is a means of preserving the at-risk units. However, the high costs of acquiring the properties(approximately $78 million) may prevent such transfers. While there is not currently a need for rental subsidies required to preserve the 183 assisted units, the long-term affordability of the units cannot be ensured. Other financial incentives may also be necessary to convince property owners to maintain the affordable units. However, the option of constructing 183replacement units is as costly and potentially constrained by various factors, including growing scarcity of multi-family residential land, rising land costs, and community opposition.The County should continue to monitor the rents at El Sobrante Silvercrest and Park Regency and implement Action HE-A2.2 in the Housing Plan in compliance with state law and be prepared to work with the El Sobrante Silvercrest owners to refinance the project with a new tax-exempt bond issued at a lower interest rate in exchange for extended affordability terms if market rents increase above the affordable rents. This is likely the best option to preserve the at-risk units in El Sobrante Silvercrest. The County has past experience with this approach and considers it to be an effective means to preserve affordable housing units. Per requirements of Action HE-A2.2, the County will also work with the owners of Park Regency and pursue all options to maintain affordability of the units at Park Regency.
6-50 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementTABLE 6-31 INVENTORY OF ASSISTED RENTAL HOUSINGProject NameTotal UnitsAssisted UnitsHousehold TypeFunding Source(s)Expiration of Affordability (ABC) A Better Chance Apartments462 Corte Arango, El Sobrante144DisabledHCD, HUD Section 811; HOPWA2062Aspen Court Apartments121 Aspen Drive, Pacheco125Disabled with HIV/AIDSHUD Sections 8 and 811; HOPWA; HOME2065Avalon Bay ApartmentsContra Costa Centre101 Harvey Drive, Walnut Creek447111FamilyTax-exempt bonds2065Bay Point Family Apartments2471 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point193191FamilyLIHTC2073Bella Monte Apartments2420 Willow Pass, Bay Point5251FamilyLIHTC, HCD, tax-exempt bonds, HOPWA, HOME; CDBG2060Crockett Senior Housing/Carquinez Vista Manor1212 Wanda Street, Crockett3735SeniorHUD Section 202; CDBG; HOME2056Coggins Square ApartmentsContra Costa Centre1316 Las Juntas Way, Walnut Creek8786FamilyHOME; bonds; LIHTC, HUD2077Community Heritage Senior Apts.1555 3rd St., North Richmond5252SeniorHUD Section 2022060Creekside Terrace5038 San Pablo Dam RoadEl Sobrante5756FamilyHUD Sections 8, 236, & 2412044De Anza Gardens205 Pueblo Avenue, Bay Point17981FamilyLIHTC2058El Sobrante Silvercrest4630 Appian Way, El Sobrante5049SeniorHUD Sections 8 & 2022032Elaine Null Court112 Alves Lane, Bay Point1414DisabledBonds; HOME; LIHTC2074
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-51Project NameTotal UnitsAssisted UnitsHousehold TypeFunding Source(s)Expiration of Affordability Heritage Point1500 Fred Jackson Way, North Richmond4241FamilyLIHTC; CDBG; bonds2074Hidden Cove Apartments2901 Mary Anne Lane, Bay Point8887FamilyLIHTC; bonds2074Hilltop Commons15690 Crestwood Dr., San Pablo322169FamilyLIHTC; bonds2074Meadow Wood at Alamo Creek3000 Damani Ct., Danville120118SeniorDVAHP2043Mission Bay (Willow Pass) Apts.1056 Weldon Lane, Bay Point120119FamilyLIHTC2053Montevista Senior Apartments13728 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo8267SeniorLIHTC2070Park Regency3128 Oak Road, Walnut Creek892134Familybonds2033Rodeo Senior Apartments710 Willow Avenue, Rodeo5049SeniorsHUD, Section 202; HOME2062Villas at Monterosso1000 Casablanca Terrace, Danville9696Familybonds2037Willowbrook Apartments110 Bailey Road, Bay Point7271Disabled/ Senior (62+)LIHTC, HUD Sections 8 & 2212071TTotals 3,078 1,686 Sources: California Housing Partnership Preservation Database, 2021; Contra Costa County, 2021.HOME: Home Investment Partnership Act funds HOPWA: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDSLIHTC: Low-Income Housing Tax Credit CDBG: Community Development Block GrantDVAHP: Dougherty Valley Affordable Housing Program Domestic Violence Assistance Housing Program
6-52 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementF. FUTURE HOUSING NEED Future housing need refers to the share of the region’s housing growth that has been allocated to a community. In brief, ABAG calculates future housing need based on projected household growth, plus a certain amount of units needed to account for normal and appropriate level of vacancies and the replacement of units lost to conversion or demolition. In December 2021, ABAG adopted its final regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) based on both existing need and projected need for housing. ABAG published the Regional Housing Needs Plan San Francisco Bay Area, which explains in detail the process to allocate the Bay Area regional housing needs. This document provides detailed information on the RHNA process. Table 6-32 provides a breakdown of the County’s share of future regional housing needs by four income categories: very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. As indicated, the share of regional housing needs allocated to the unincorporated areas is7,610new units over the 2023-2031 RHNA period. Through this Housing Element, the County must demonstrate the availability of adequate sites to accommodate these projected new units.In January 2007, Assembly Bill (AB) 2634 took effect, which requires Housing Elements to include an analysis of extremely low-income needs and address those needs in proposed programs. According to California Government Code Section 65583(a)(1), Contra Costa County may “presume that 50 percent of the very low-income households qualify as extremely low-income households.” Based on this assumption, 1,036 units should be planned for for extremely low-income households and 1,036 units for very low-income households.TABLE 6-32 REGIONAL HOUSING NEED ASSESSMENTGeographyVery Low Income (<50% of AMI)Low Income (50%-80% of AMI)Moderate Income (80%-120% of AMI)Above Moderate Income (>120% of AMI)TotalUnincorporated Contra Costa 2,0721,1941,2113,1337,61100 Contra Costa County13,3467,6857,80720,20549,043 The Final RHNA was adopted December 16, 2021.Data Source: ABAG Housing Element Data Package 2021; and ABAG December 2021.G. ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSINGAssembly Bill (AB) 686 requires that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015.Under state law, affirmatively further fair housing means “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.”To comply with AB 686, the County has completed the following outreach and analysis.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-531. OutreachAs discussed in the “Public Participation” section of the Housing Element in Chapter 1, Introduction, the County took diligent efforts to encourage public and stakeholder participation in the Housing Element update process. These efforts included two stakeholder focus group sessions held in October and November 2021, a Board of Supervisors study session in December 2021, and a virtual community meeting on February 9, 2022. The County is also part of the Contra Costa County Consortium that prepared an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing in 2019 that included extensive outreach as part of that effort.Beginning in 2017, the County participated in stakeholder outreach meetings as part of the Analysis of Impediments community participation process. Meetings were held in September 2017 as well as January, February, March, May, and June 2018. The process included community-based organizations, housing developers, social services organizations, government agencies, legal service providers, and others. The primary concerns raised during these meetings included a lack of affordable housing and the challenges of accessing and securing housing. Stakeholders also identified community opposition as a key barrier to increasing affordable housing supply, thus furthering displacement of target populations. Strategies identified to address fair housing issues included improving coordination between and within governments to reduce barriers to affordable development and improve transit access.The purpose of the stakeholder focus group meetings was to engage with service providers and developers to gather first-hand experience and knowledge regarding gaps in housing services and barriers to housing to develop policy and program solutions to assist in addressing gaps. The County emailed each organization to invite them to attend the focus groups and provided a Zoom link upon receipt of an RSVP. Ten developers attended and participated in the developer focus group meeting held on October 18, 2021. Attendees discussed the challenges of constructing affordable housing given labor and material costs, state requirements, and land costs. Participants expressed that the most feasible way to create affordable homeownership opportunities is through acquiring and remodeling units, rather than building new units. Where new affordable units are wanted, developers emphasized a need for RHNA sites to be identified in high-scoring TCAC areas that are eligible for funding to facilitate securing TCAC funding for new projects.Fourteen service providers attended the service provider focus group meeting on November 3, 2021. The primary fair housing issue that service providers identified is the gaps in housing services and systems that put certain populations at risk of homelessness. For example, young persons are too old for foster care services but are typically not eligible for Section 8 vouchers or other assistance programs, leaving them with few housing options. Additionally, aging in place has become more complex as seniors often have “flat” incomes and are in need of increasingly more supportive care. However, there is insufficient supportive housing to meet the need and affordable housing near services that would allow seniors to age in place. Stabilizing housing across age ranges and severity of need is vital to ensuring ongoing housing opportunities for all populations. The feedback from these meetings supports the findings of this Assessment of Fair Housing that many lower-income households have been pushed into lower-resource communities in the county or out of the county entirely. Several programs have been developed to address these issues based on stakeholder feedback and fair housing findings, as identified in Table 6-38.
6-54 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementOn February 9, 2022, the County held a virtual workshop that included a breakout room discussion on fair housing. There were seven participants, including four residents from unincorporated Walnut Creek, unincorporated North Richmond, and other locations within the county. There were several commonly expressed key issues related to fair housing brought up by participants. Frequently mentioned were gaps in access to services that often result from the interrelationship of income, housing affordability, and access to resources and services. Participants emphasized that more affordable housing is typically in areas with low-resource accessibility, such as adjacent to industrial uses or vehicular transportation routes, and conversely areas with high-resource opportunities are associated with housing affordable to moderate- and above moderate-income residents. Several programs have been developed to address these issues based on breakout session feedback and fair housing findings, as identified in Table 6-38.According to participant input, comparable to other communities in the ABAG area, this pattern of income-related housing segregation in Contra Costa County has historically been influenced by policies of exclusionary zoning and inequitable review processes associated with higher-density, affordable housing proposals, supported by a specific example of a denied project in the Canyon area. Further discussion related to the stigmatism of affordable and/or high-density housing proposals during the entitlement process suggested that affordable housing is viewed as substandard and therefore not acceptable in more resource-strong areas of the county. Combined with racial bias and compounded by persistent NIMBYism4, the 4NIMBYism or “not in my backyard,” is characteristic of opposition to locating something within one’s own neighborhood.inequitable distribution of affordable housing and its potential for housing displacement was a shared sentiment of the breakout group participants.The example of an area in unincorporated Walnut Creek was given, where one side of the block near BART is low density and in an area designated as high resource by TCAC/HCD mapping, while the other side is high density and designated a low resource area. The consensus was that there is a need to make sure state and local policies actually “move the needle” on fair housing discrepancies, including linking density bonuses with long-term affordability and rezoning land for high density, which will be addressed by policies and programs as identified in Table 6-38.The challenges of lower-income populations in securing housing in the county, particularly for renters, is a fair housing issue identified by participants in the breakout session, specifically considering the need for rental leniency on the rental application and screening process. Rental requirements to engage in 12-month leases, inflexibility by landlords about payment expectations, and the practice of approvals being subject to a stringent background check, especially in cases where applicants may not have an established financial record or have experienced a situation that negatively impacted their background check, often lead to housing displacement, as was the case for one of the participants. Housing quality problems and poor condition of rental properties, as well as potential ownership units affordable to lower-income households, were also mentioned, suggesting the need for stronger maintenance and rehabilitation efforts in the county.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-55Comparable to feedback from previous outreach efforts during the General Plan/Housing Element process, the necessity to identify ways to implement more widespread outreach efforts with the intent to connect underrepresented and low-income groups into the planning effort was reiterated in this breakout session dialogue.The collection process for this qualitative data is described in greater detail in the Public Participation section of this Housing Element and the feedback informed this assessment of fair housing and associated programs identified in Table 6-38.2. Fair Housing IssuesState Government Code Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) requires the County to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. According to the 2021 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, there are no areas of high segregation in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County (Figure 6-2). The Opportunity Map identifies the central and southern portions of the county as largely high and highest resource, western and northern portions as low resource, and areas of moderate resource scattered in the northwest and eastern areas. Discovery Bay is the only area with high and highest resource designation outside central Contra Costa County.
6-56 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-2 TCAC RESOURCE AREA DESIGNATIONS, 2021Data Source: TCAC/HCD 2021
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-57Patterns of Integration and Segregation IncomeAs discussed earlier in the Housing Needs Assessment of this Housing Element, a lower-income, four-person household in Contra Costa County is any that earns less than $109,600 annually (Table 6-11). As shown in Table 6-33, only six unincorporated areas have a median income in the moderate- or above moderate-income range. These areas largely correspond with the areas TCAC and HCD have designated as high and highest resource areas and have the greatest anticipated economic outcomes for residents, reflecting distribution of opportunity in more affluent areas. The communities with the highest median income are those in central Contra Costa County, including; Alhambra Valley/Reliez Valley/Briones; Alamo/CastleHills; and Diablo; the western community of Kensington; andthe eastern community of Discovery Bay. As shown in Figure 6-3, these findings correspond with the areas with the lowest rates of poverty and highest median incomes.In 2014, the highest rates of poverty were concentrated in the North Richmond vicinity and Bay Point. However, there was still a presence of extremely low-income households in the north central communities, including the vicinity of Alhambra Valley, Reliez Valley, Briones, and Contra Costa Centre (see Figure 6-4). However, in 2019, the concentration of poverty in the Bay Point area had decreased slightly, shifting east, while the percentage of the population below the poverty line in central Contra Costa County noticeably dropped (see Figure 6-3). During this time period, poverty continued to persist in the most western portion of the county, including North Richmond. As demonstrated in Table 6-33, however, lower-income communities continue to be those along the San Francisco and Suisun Bay, where industrial uses are more prevalent, and there is greater density than in central communities.TABLE 6-33 MEDIAN INCOME BY UNINCORPORATED AREAGeographic AreaMedian IncomeIncome CategoryContra Costa County$88,456Very LowAlhambra Valley/Reliez Valley/Briones$160,395ModerateAlamo/Castle Hills$187,647Above ModerateBay Point$50,752Extremely LowBethel Island$66,029Extremely LowByron$68,750Extremely LowCanyon$109,677ModerateClyde$85,736Very LowContra Costa Centre$96,375Very LowCrockett$73,638Very LowDiablo$164,052ModerateDiscovery Bay$109,773LowEast Richmond Heights$75,455Very LowEl Sobrante$82,655Very LowKensington$145,665ModerateKnightsen$90,165Very LowMontalvin Manor/Tara Hills/Bayview$74,666Very LowNorth Richmond$50,313Extremely LowPacheco$75,700Very LowPort Costa$90,833Very LowRodeo$70,217Extremely LowData Source: 2013-2017 ACS, HCD State Income Limits, 2022*Income category designation for a 4-person household in Contra Costa County.
6-58 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-3 RATE OF POVERTY IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2019Data Source: 2015-2019 ACS
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-59FIGURE 6-4 RATE OF POVERTY IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2014Data Source: 2010-2014 ACS
6-60 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementThose neighborhoods with moderate- and above-moderate median incomes correspond with those identified by the Urban Displacement Project as “stable/advanced exclusive,” meaning that they are affordable only to high or mixed high-income households and show signs of rapid increase in housing costs. Bay Point and eastern communities are considered to range from “low-income/susceptible to displacement” to “at risk of gentrification” or “at risk of becoming exclusive.” These indicate that, while lower-income households may have concentrated in coastal communities for more affordable housing costs, all communities are expected to become unaffordable without intervention.In the Bay Area region, many areas with a concentration of poverty, low median incomes, and poor anticipated economic outcomes for residents have a history of redlining. The national practice of redlining in the 1930s made it difficult for residents within identified neighborhoods to get loans for homeownership or maintenance, resulting in cycles of disinvestment and preventing residents from building generational wealth. Redlined neighborhoods had concentrations of Black and African American residents and other minority populations. While racially restrictive covenants have been illegal for decades, the patterns of concentrated poverty that developed during this period, and a legacy of lost generational wealth, can still be seen throughout the Bay Area. While historic redlining maps are not available for Contra Costa County, the income patterns showing and public feedback received regarding concentrations of lower-income households in western and northern communities align with a history of industrial uses that reflects the patterns found in areas that do have formal redlining maps, such as Emeryville, Oakland, Berkeley, and San Francisco. In addition, outreach participants emphasized that NIMBYism has significantly impacted the type and distribution of affordable housing resources and resulting concentrations of lower-income populations in the western portion of the county. The distribution of wealth in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area has resulted in areas of exclusivity, presenting barriers to economic and housing mobility for lower-income households that would facilitate future integration. To address the obstacles to economic mobility for lower-income residents and proactively counter the anticipated gentrification in many lower-income communities, the County will implement Action HE-3.1 to provide financial assistance and other incentives for affordable rental and ownership opportunities, Action HE-A3.2 to support the development of affordable housing on County-owned land in Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo, Action HE-A3.5 to encourage construction of accessory dwelling units (ADUs)as a potential affordable housing option in high resource and potentially exclusive areas such as the Alhambra Valley, Reliez Valley, Briones, Alamo, and Castle Hill areas, expand homeownership opportunities for lower-income households (Action HE-A5.1), and Action HE-A8.1 to target place--based revitalization through community-based programs rather than development in areas of concentrated poverty. Race and EthnicityAs presented in the Housing Needs Assessment of this Housing Element, unincorporated Contra Costa County is an ethnically and racially mixed jurisdiction that has become increasingly diverse in the last two decades.Since 2000, the White population has decreased by approximately 17 percent, while the Hispanic or Latino population has increased by approximately 10 percent. However, while the unincorporated area is diverse, it is not necessarily integrated. Figure 6-5 shows how the predominant population varies notably across the county. In the
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-61communities closer to the bay, diversity is higher, with a predominant population of Hispanic or Latino in Bay Point, North Richmond, Tara Hills,Montalvin Manor, and Rollingwood and predominantly Asian in the eastern portion of Rodeo, southwest of the cities of San Ramon and Danville, and between the cities of Pittsburg and Concord. In contrast, the center and eastern portions of the county, including the communities of Diablo, Discovery Bay, Reliez Valley/Briones, Alamo/Castle Hill, Saranap, San Miguel, Acalanes Ridge, La Casa Via, Shell Ridge, Mountain View, and Alhambra Valleyare predominantly White. The patterns of concentrations of non-White populations in Contra Costa County reflect those found throughout the Bay Area, with minority populations predominantly in dense urban and historically industrial areas near the bay, with a larger presence of White persons in inland, suburban communities. The Contra Costa County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing(“County AI”) found that Contra Costa County is “slightly more heavily non-Hispanic White” compared to the greater San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Metropolitan Statistical Area (“Region”), where many areas have slightly higher percentages of non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders. While there are concentrations of minority populations throughout the unincorporated county, none qualify as racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs). A R/ECAP, as defined by HUD, is an area where 50 percent or more of the population identifies as non-White and 40 percent or more of individuals live below the poverty line. In the region, there are several R/ECAPs in incorporated jurisdictions, including one in the City of Concord, one in the City of Berkeley, and multiple in the City of Oakland. While no unincorporated areas meet this criterion or these criteria, North Richmond has a median household income of $50,313, falling in the very low-income category, and is 65 percent Hispanic or Latino, and Bay Point is $50,752, also in the very low-income category, and is 58 percent Hispanic or Latino. These communities, and others, have been identified by the County as disadvantaged communities under Senate Bill (SB) 1000. These include Bay Point, Crockett, Rodeo, North Richmond, Montara Bay, Vine Hill, and Mountain View. All of these communities have been identified based on a variety of indicators that may be present, such as ozone concentration, traffic density, cleanup sites, solid waste sites, impaired water bodies, limited English-speaking households, and more. While most of these indicators are not based on racial and ethnic concentrations, the areas in unincorporated Contra Costa County with concentrations of minority populations typically align with indicators that determine disadvantaged communities. The County has developed programs and policies to improve the conditions in these communities and, in turn, affirmatively further fair housing by promoting integration, housing choices, and place-based revitalization efforts (see Table 6-38 and other General Plan elements). Unlike R/ECAPs, there are areas in unincorporated Contra Costa County that are possible racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAA). A RCAA was defined in 2019 in the HUD’s Cityscape periodical by Goetz et al. in Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence: A Preliminary Investigationas a census tract in which 80 percent or more of the population is White and has a median income greater than $125,000 annually. By this definition, the community of Diablo and eastern portions of Discovery Bay are RCAAs. Additionally, many central areas of Contra Costa County are predominantly affluent and White, though do not meet the criteria of RCAAs.
6-62 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-5 PREDOMINANT POPULATIONSData Source: 2015-2019 ACS
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-63Familial StatusAccording to the County AI, there is a higher percentage of children in Contra Costa County than in the region as a whole. This corresponds with a higher representation of families with children and a lower percentage of seniors. While the percentage of children peaked in the early 2000s and has since declined, the dominance of families in Contra Costa County is reflected by a higher proportion of the housing stock consisting of multi-bedroom single-family detached homes than in the region overall. The rate of households who are married couples with children is higher in suburban communities such as Diablo, Discovery Bay, Blackhawk, and Alamo, among others. In more urban communities with higher housing densities, the rate of adults living alone or without a spouse (such as roommate situations) increases. Examples of communities with a more balanced rate of household types include District 1 and District 5 communities, including North Richmond, Tara Hills, and Bay Point. The concentration of female-headed households is highest in Rodeo and the portion of Crockett west of Interstate 80, where more than 40 percent of households are female, single-parent households. In this area, approximately 19 percent of households live below the poverty line. Despite the dominance of families with children in Contra Costa County, this area in Rodeo and Crockett indicates a possible concentration of female-headed households living below the poverty line and a greater need for affordable housing with multiple bedrooms for families. However, fair housing cases reported by HUD indicate that there is not an issue with discrimination based on familial status in this area of the county, supporting the finding these households may be concentrated here due to affordability or housing type. To encourage the construction of housing types geared toward families, the County has included Action HE-A4.1 to work with housing developers to provide housing for large households.DisabilityAs stated in the Housing Needs Assessment, nearly 20 percent of unincorporated County residents report having a disability. According to the County AI, ambulatory difficulties are the most common disability type for unincorporated county residents, followed by independent living difficulties, cognitive difficulties, hearing difficulties, self-care difficulties, and, least commonly, vision difficulties. Approximately 11 percent of the noninstitutionalized population in the unincorporated County have a disability, compared with nearly 10 percent of the region’s population. The institutionalized population includes residents of nursing homes, prisons, jails, mental hospitals, and juvenile correctional facilities. This minor difference is reflected in the disability-specific comparison, with a slightly higher percentage of each individual disability in Contra Costa County than in the region. Persons with disabilities in Contra Costa County are more likely to earn a wage below the poverty line than non-disabled workers, indicating that a higher percentage of persons with disabilities may result in a higher rate of poverty, particularly for extremely low-income persons that need accessible housing options or supportive services.While the percentage of the population with a disability varies slightly throughout the county, there are no significant concentrations of this population. In most populated County areas, disability rates range from less than 10 percent in Rodeo, Bay Point, and many central areas of the county to 17 percent in Crockett. The areas with the lowest poverty rates in the center of the county are mainly undeveloped and recreational, so they do not accurately represent patterns in the county. Given that the disability rate in populated areas has minimal variation, it is likely that persons with disabilities have similar accessible housing options throughout the county
6-64 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementand therefore have housing options in all communities. Disability rates and patterns have not shifted notably since 2010.While the disability rate is slightly higher in Contra Costa County than in the region, the patterns of concentration are similar between the two. More urban areas with a higher density of population, often along the bay and in downtown areas, have slightly higher rates of disability in both the Bay Area and the county. This may be due to a concentration of accessible housing, proximity to transit, and the availability of resources in these areas. Contra Costa County largely reflects disability patterns found throughout the region.Access to OpportunityMobilityAllTransit is a transit and connectivity analytic tool developed by the Center for Neighborhood Technology to advance equitable communities and urban sustainability. The tool analyzes the transit frequency, routes, and access to determine an overall transit score at the city, county, and regional levels. Figure 6-6 depicts the areas in Contra Costa County where transit is available and shows areas with higher scores of connectivity, access to jobs, and frequency of service. Overall, Contra Costa County has a transit score of 5.0 compared to 7.1 in Alameda County, 3.9 in Solano County, and 6.8 in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Metro Area. The slightly lower score in Contra Costa County than Alameda County and the urban MSA is likely due to the concentration of populations along the bay and in the center of the county. Limited to no transit services are available in the eastern areas, or connections running east-west. There are several public transportation options available to residents of Contra Costa County: County Connection, West-Cat, Tri-Delta Transit, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, and BART. The County Connection is a fixed-route bus service that serves central County cities and communities from Martinez in the north to Pleasanton in the south. West-Cat serves Pinole, Hercules, Tara Hills, Rodeo, and Crockett, Tri-Delta Transit serves Bay Point to the west to Brentwood in the east. The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District operates routes in the western county, with routes extending from Tara Hills in the north to Milpitas to the south, as well as with western connections to Palo Alto and San Francisco. BART is a regional light-rail system with several stops in Contra Costa County, connecting residents to destinations throughout the Bay Area. All three transportation options offer discounts for youth, seniors, and persons with disabilities.As shown in Figure 6-6, the areas with the highest transit scores are in the western county, where Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District operates, and along BART corridors. As described in the analysis of patterns of integration and segregation, the highest concentrations of non-White and lower-income persons are in the western county, where there are several transit options. Therefore, it can be concluded that racial and ethnic groups and income classes have relatively equal access to transportation options. Given the higher transit scores in the west, it may be concluded that populations in the western area have better access to transit than residents of more affluent communities in the central county.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-65FIGURE 6-6 TRANSIT SCORES, CONTRA COSTA COUNTYData Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology, AllTransit.cnt.org, 2021
6-66 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementEmployment OpportunitiesHUD developed two indices to analyze access to employment opportunities that were included in the County’s AI. The jobs proximity index identifies census tracts based on their proximity to employment opportunities and the labor market engagement index scores labor force participation and human capital in each tract, with consideration of unemployment rates and educational attainment. For both indices, a higher score indicates stronger job proximity or labor force participation.According to these indices, labor market engagement is highest in the central portion of the county, aligning with areas of affluence and concentrations of White, non-Hispanic populations. The lowest engagement scores are found in northwestern communities, including North Richmond, Rodeo, and Rollingwood.. These communities have higher concentrations of Hispanic and Black residents, revealing potentially disproportionate access to employment opportunities by race and ethnicity. In Contra Costa County, the highest labor force engagement rate among non-Hispanic Black residents is found in areas with the lowest concentration of residents that identify with this racial and ethnic group, while, in contrast, the lowest labor force engagement rate for this group is in areas with the highest concentration. This pattern is the opposite for Asians and Pacific Islanders.5, which have the highest labor force engagement rate in areas of the highest concentrations.5Contra Costa County Consortium, 2019. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing. p. 107. https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/59623/Final-BOS-Approved-AI-6-11-19In support of the labor force engagement index findings, HUD’s jobs proximity index indicates that the census tracts with the closest proximity to employment opportunities are in the central portion of the county (see Figure 6-7). HUD’s jobs proximity index measures the accessibility of an area to all jobs within a statistical area, weighting large employment centers more heavily than individual jobs. The communities with the furthest proximity to jobs in the northwest and northeast portions of the county have higher concentrations of non-White residents than central portions of the County. While there are jobs available in these areas, there are few large employers given the density of population, which may require residents to commute to other areas of the county or into the greater Bay Area for employment. In contrast, large employers in suburban areas, such as the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County departments located throughout the central corridor of the county, offer a variety of jobs to residents in this area.This pattern of close proximity of jobs to areas that are predominantly White can be found throughout the Bay Area, with the closest examples in the cities of Berkeley, San Francisco, Dublin, and Livermore. Minority populations throughout the region are often concentrated in areas with low labor market engagement and job proximity scores, with Asian and White residents having greater access to employment opportunities.The Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County offers a variety of services to help all job seekers, including youth aged 16-24, to identify job opportunities, improve resume and interviewing skills, and other job search
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-67and training services. Contra Costa Employment and Human Services also encourages businesses to hire formerly incarcerated people, a group that is disproportionately unemployed and has difficulties securing housing. To further promote these programs and services and improve access to employment opportunities for lower-income and non-White residents, particularly in areas identified as having more limited access, the County has included Action HE-A8.1 to promote services provided by the Workforce Development Board and facilitate improved access to these services in communities of need.
6-68 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-7 JOB PROXIMITY INDEX SCORESData Source: HUD, 2014-2017
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-69Educational OpportunitiesSchool quality is often tied with housing, with neighborhoods with higher median incomes and home values often having access to higher-performing schools than lower-income neighborhoods. Income distribution influences home values, property taxes, and therefore funding for public schools. As such, school districts with higher concentrations of affordable housing typically have lower test scores , creating a cyclical problem of not offering these students equal educational opportunities. Therefore, disparities in access to solid school opportunities indicate fair housing and equal access to opportunities. According to the AI’s analysis of HUD’s School Proficiency Index, areas in Contra Costa County with greater affluence have higher school proficiency. In turn, areas with lower median incomes (typically the coastal communities) have lower index scores. In eastern and northern communities, schools are generally lower performing than in central and southern areas of the county. The AI overlaid race and ethnicity with school proficiency and found that non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic residents are concentrated in neighborhoods with low school proficiency scores.6The discrepancy between the location of lower-income households in low resource areas and higher-income households in high resource areas, particularly concerning educational resources, even within the same block group, was identified and discussed in outreach sessions.6Contra Costa County Consortium, 2019. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing. p. 98-102. https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/59623/Final-BOS-Approved-AI-6-11-19Each year, the California Department of Education (DOE) publishes performance metrics for each school in the state, including student assessment results for English Language Arts and Mathematics as they compare to the state on meeting grade-level standards. There are approximately 21 schools in unincorporated communities of Contra Costa County, including 15 elementary schools, three middle schools, one high school, one continuation high school, and one charter school. Performance scores were not available for Gateway Continuation High School; however, it is worth noting that continuation schools typically serve students who struggle with traditional school environments and present a valuable opportunity for students who may otherwise not complete high school.Of the remaining 20 schools, in 2019, the DOE reported that all but three fall below statewide grade standards in either English Language Arts or Mathematics, or both. The only schools that scored at or above statewide grade standards include:xJohn Swett High in Crockett scored 23.8 points above state standards inEnglish Language Arts.xDiscovery Bay Elementary in Discovery Bay scored 31 points above state standards in English Language Arts and 26 points above state standards in Mathematics.xOld River Elementary in Discovery Bay scored 2.2 points above state standards in English Language Arts.
6-70 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementWith the exception of John Swett High in Crockett, the anticipated educational outcome, according to TCAC/HCD opportunity maps, is lowest in western and northern communities, where there are greater concentrations of lower-income households and more limited access to resources. The highest educational outcomes are expected in Central Contra Costa County, where communities have higher median incomes (see Figure 6-8).On average, nearly 14.0 percent of students at schools in unincorporated communities are chronically absent, according to DOE, meaning that they are missing 10 percent or more of the instructional days they were enrolled. The highest rates of chronic absenteeism typically correlate with those schools with the highest percentage of students that are considered socially disadvantaged or students that are eligible for free or reduced-price meals or have parents or guardians who did not receive a high school diploma. For example, Verde Elementary in North Richmond has a chronic absenteeism rate of approximately 22.0 percent, and 97.0 percent of students are considered socially disadvantaged. Performance metrics at Verde Elementary are also 87 points below state grade standards for English Language Arts and 112 points below the state grade standard for Mathematics. This correlation between high rates of socially disadvantaged students, chronic absenteeism, and poor performance scores can be found throughout the county and beyond. From this, it can be concluded that instability arising from poverty, housing, and food insecurity, among other factors, may affect school performance.Addressing housing instability for families with children living in substandard housing or poverty, paired with encouraging integration of affordable housing in high opportunities, may improve educational opportunities for all students. The Housing Element includes a set of housing programs to increase housing opportunity for extremely low-income households, including Action HE-A8.1 to expand Housing Choice Voucher usage throughout the county and encourage affordable housing in high resource areas.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-71FIGURE 6-8 EXPECTED EDUCATIONAL OUTCOME SCOREData Source: TCAC/HCD 2021
6-72 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementEnvironmental HealthA disadvantaged community or environmental justice community (“EJ Community”) is identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency (“Cal EPA”) as “areas that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation,” and may or may not have a concentration of low-income households, high unemployment rates, low homeownership rates, overpayment for housing, or other indicators ofdisproportionate housing need. The Envision Contra Costa 2040 General Plan update referred to these communities as “Impacted Communities”. In February 2021, the California Office for Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (COEHHA) released the fourth version of CalEnviroScreen, a tool that uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic indicators to map and compare a community’s environmental scores. In the CalEnviroScreen tool, communities that have a cumulative score in the 75th percentile or above (25 percent highest score census tracts) are those that have been designated as disadvantaged communities under SB 535. The cumulative score for each census tract includes an exposure score, with a low score being a positive outcome, for each of the following:xOzone concentrationsxPM2.5concentrationsxDiesel particulate matter emissionsxDrinking water contaminantsxChildren’s lead risk xUse of certain high-hazard, high-volatility pesticidesxToxic releases from facilitiesxTraffic impactsCommunities that are identified as disadvantaged communities based on their cumulative pollution exposure score are targeted for investment through the State cap-and-trade program. However, the condition of these communities poses fair housing concerns due to disproportionate exposure to unhealthy living conditions. Under SB 535, the communities of Bay Point, Rodeo, Crockett, Montalvin Manor, and Bayview are considered disadvantaged due to exposure to environmental contaminants (see Figure 6-9).In addition to this SB 535 designation, the County identified these communities, as well as Tara Hills, Vine Hill, and Mountain View, as disadvantaged under SB 1000. SB 1000 disadvantaged communities are scored on the same eight exposure risks as SB 535, in addition to considering historic discrimination, negligence, and political and economic disempowerment that often result in disproportionate burden of pollution and health impacts in these communities. Each of the disadvantaged communities has its roots in heavy industrial and manufacturing uses given their locations along railway tracks and near ports for shipment of raw materials and products and, later, their proximity to freeways. The combined impact of these factors has led to pollution and unhealthy environmental conditions for residents.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-73FIGURE 6-9 ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENData Source: OEHHA, CalEPA 2021, CalEnviroScreen 4.0, 2021
6-74 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementWith the exception of Vine Hill and Mountain View, all disadvantaged communities have a lower rate of non-Hispanic White residents than the county overall, significantly lower than those areas with high environmental scores in the central portion of the county (Figure 6-9). When compared to the region, the AI found that non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic residents have more limited access to environmental healthy neighborhoods than non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Asian residents. Throughout the Bay Area region, non-Hispanic Blacks more often are concentrated in neighborhoods with poor environmental conditions while non-Hispanic White residents have access to the strongest environmental conditions. This may be due to the concentration of historically industrial and disadvantaged communities near shipping ports, railway tracks, and freeways. Today, these communities remain the most affordable in the region due to poor environmental conditions, resulting in a persistent fair housing issue of concentrating lower-income and non-White households in areas of poor environmental quality.Disability ServicesAccording to the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County, there are licensed adult residential care facilities in El Sobrante, Rodeo, Bay Point, and Alamo, and assisted living facilities for the elderly in El Sobrante, Rodeo, Mountain View, Bay Point, and Alamo. In addition to these resources, there are facilities in incorporated jurisdictions that also serve nearby residents of unincorporated areas. The County supplements these facilities by offering In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) to eligible seniors and persons with disabilities to assist with daily living activities and support individuals living independently in their own homes.In addition to support services, paratransit services are available to persons with disabilities through County Connection LINK, East Bay Paratransit Consortium, Tri-Delta Transit Dial-A-Ride, and WestCAT Dial-A-Ride. These programs offer door-to-door transportation to assist persons with disabilities with accessing non-emergency medical appointments, running errands, and other daily activities.The County also requires new developments to comply with Title 24 of the 2019 California Building Code to ensure that all new construction meets accessible design standards, thus ensuring that all new housing is accessible for all residents regardless of disability. Additionally, the County will ensure that older housing that may not meet the same accessibility requirements can be adapted as needed by formalizing a written reasonable accommodation procedure (Action HE-A4.2). Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement RiskOvercrowdingAs discussed in the Housing Needs Assessment, the U.S. Census Bureau defines an overcrowded household as a unit that is occupied by more than one person per room. A small percentage of overcrowded units is not uncommon, and often includes families with children who share rooms or multi-generational households. However, high rates of overcrowding may indicate a fair housing issue resulting from situations such as two families or households occupying one unit to reduce housing costs (sometimes referred to as “doubling up”). Situations such as this may indicate a shortage of appropriately sized and affordable housing units. The patterns of
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-75overcrowding seen in the western portion of the county reflect the experience reported by members of the public during the outreach process. Participants expressed that high housing costs and difficulties of securing housing with a poor rental history can present a barrier to securing housing at an affordable price that meets the needs of the household.There are two areas of concentrated overcrowding in unincorporated Contra Costa County: the far western area surrounding and including North Richmond and the northern area of Bay Point and surrounding areas. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, across all unincorporated Contra Costa County, approximately 3.2 percent of households are overcrowded and an additional 1.4 percent are severely overcrowded. In comparison, roughly 13.6 percent of North Richmond households, 7.8 percent of Montalvin Manor/Bayview households, and 11.8 percent of Bay Point households are overcrowded. Outside of these areas, rates of overcrowding are largely consistent, typically less than 5 percent. The central portion of the county, south of the community of Alamo, and the eastern portion, including Bethel Island and DiscoveryBay, have overcrowding rates of less than 2 percent. The overcrowding in the eastern and northern communities aligns with areas of concentrated lower-income households and non-White persons, indicating a possibly disproportionate housing burden and a need for more affordable large units in these areas. While overcrowding is a pressing issue in the North Richmond and Bay Point areas, this does not translate into severe overcrowding. The County’s severe overcrowding rates are approximately equal to or less than the county-wide rate.In addition to analyzing the specific locations of housing needed to address displacement risk due to overcrowding, the County analyzed tenure by occupants per room. In 2019, according to the ACS, approximately 3.2 percent of households in the unincorporated area were overcrowded, an increase from 2.1 percent of households in 2010. Similarly, the rate of severe overcrowding has increased to 1.4 percent from 0.8 of households in 2010. As shown in Table 6-34, renters are more burdened by overcrowding than owners, with 6.3 percent of renters overcrowded and 3.4 percent severely overcrowded in 2019, compared to 1.9 percent of owners overcrowded and 0.5 percent severely overcrowded. While tenure by overcrowding is not tiedto specific geographic areas, it is likely that the areas with the highest rates of overcrowding (North Richmond, Montalvin Manor/Bayview, and Bay Point) follow the patterns of the unincorporated county and have higher rates of renter overcrowding than owners.TABLE 6-34 OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDS BY TENUREOOvercrowdingg Status 20100 20199 Number Percentage Number Percentage Totall Households 57,997 100.0% 61,542 100.0% Overcrowded1,2342.1%1,9783.2% Severely Overcrowded4740.8%8401.4%Totall Ownerr Households 43,034 100.0% 43,555 100.0% Overcrowded6501.5%8411.9% Severely Overcrowded2490.6%2260.5%Totall Renterr Households 14,963 100.0% 17,987 100.0% Overcrowded5843.9%1,1376.3% Severely Overcrowded2251.5%6143.4%Data Source: 2006-2010 and 2015-2019 ACS, Table B25014
6-76 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementIn the Bay Area, approximately 4.4 percent of households experience overcrowding and 2.8 percent experience severe overcrowding. When compared to other counties in the ABAG region, Contra Costa has one of the lowest rates of overcrowding, with lower rates only in Marin and San Francisco Counties. This may indicate that, while overcrowding is a problem, particularly for renters, in Contra Costa County, there are more appropriately sized housing opportunities for residents here than in other areas of the region.Cost BurdenA household is considered cost burdened when they spend more than 30 percent, but less than 50 percent, of their income on housing costs. A severely cost-burdened household is one whose housing costs exceed 50 percent of their income. In unincorporated Contra Costa County, approximately 23.7 percent of renters and 16.8 percent of owners are cost-burdened, and 21.6 percent of renters and 12.0 percent of owners are severely cost-burdened (Table 6-35). White, Asian, and American Indian or Alaska Native renters report the lowest cost-burden rate among all racial groups. However, it is worth noting that 68 individuals identify as American Indian or Alaska Native, compared to 7,215 White residents and 2,039 Asian residents. Pacific Islander residents experience the highest rates of both cost burden and severe cost burden among renters, though significantly lower rates among owners. Generally, minority households experience higher rates of cost-burden than White and Asian households, and renters experience higher rates overall than owners.As seen in Figures 6-9 and 6-10, and demonstrated by Table 6-35, overpayment for housing is a chronic problem across the county and the region. However, renters experience much higher rates of overpayment throughout the county, while owner overpayment is primarily, not exclusively, in the North Richmond and Bay Point areas. Since 2014, the rate of owner overpayment has decreased in most of the county (Figure 6-10), while renter overpayment has remained high in most areas (Figure 6-11).
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-77TABLE 6-35 COST BURDEN BY TENURE AND RACE/ETHNICITY Whitee Blackk orr Africann Americann Asiann Americann Indiann orr Alaskaa Native Pacificc Islander Hispanicc Otherr Alll Cost Burden >30% and <50%Renter-Occupied Households20.7%28.6%21.1%0.0%45.5%26.4%30.2%23.7%Owner-Occupied Households14.6%18.6%18.5%38.9%14.8%22.4%26.5%16.8%Totall Households 15.9%% 23.6%% 19.3%% 24.3%% 22.3%% 24.2%% 28.2%% 18.9%% Cost Burden >50%Renter-Occupied Households20.1%29.1%20.3%0.0%34.1%22.6%17.3%21.6%Owner-Occupied Households11.8%9.8%12.3%17.7%0.0%13.4%13.8%12.0%Totall Households 13.6%% 19.6%% 14.7%% 11.0%% 8.4%% 17.5%% 15.5%% 14.9%% Data Source: HUD CHAS 2014-2018.
6-78 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-10 HOMEOWNER OVERPAYMENT, 2019Data Source: 2015-2019 ACS
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-79FIGURE 6-11 RENTER OVERPAYMENT, 2019Data Source: 2015-2019 ACS
6-80 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-12 HOMEOWNER OVERPAYMENT, 2014Data Source: 2010-2014 ACS
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-81FIGURE 6-13 RENTER OVERPAYMENT, 2014Data Source: 2010-2014 ACS
6-82 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementSubstandard HousingHousing condition presents another issue in unincorporated Contra Costa County that may increase displacement risk for residents. Approximately 75 percent of housing units in the County’s unincorporated areas are older than 30 years. At this age, many units need at least minor repairs. As discussed in Section C of this Housing Needs Assessment, an estimated 2,906 housing units in Unincorporated Contra Costa County have moderate or severe physical problems. Additionally, according to the County Building Department, approximately 20 residential units per year in the Unincorporated County are identified as not inhabitable and needing immediate replacement. While stakeholders did not identify substandard housing conditions as a fair housing issue in the county, residents in the February 2022 breakout session discussed rental housing conditions, and the circumstances that, in many cases, the only housing available for ownership opportunities requires significant rehabilitation investment, whichis usually beyond the economic feasibility of lower-income households. Typically areas with higher median incomes have better housing conditions despite the age of the housing stock, as occupants are more likely to have a high enough income to afford ongoing maintenance. To alleviate the costs associated with rehabilitating units and mitigate this fair housing barrier, the Department of Conservation and Development currently offers the Neighborhood Preservation Program, providing zero and low-interest loans for rehabilitating units owned and occupied by lower-income households in unincorporated areas. HomelessnessAs discussed in the Special Housing Needs Analysis section of the Housing Needs Assessment, there are approximately 2,277 homeless persons living in Contra Costa County. Contra Costa County Health, Housing, and Homeless Services (H3) agency reported that in 2020, just 54 homeless persons resided in unincorporated areas of the county based on where they reported their last permanent address or where they slept the night before accessing homeless services provided by H3. Persons experiencing homelessness or at risk of becoming homeless are typically extremely low-income and are displaced from housing due to inability to pay or other issues. While there may be additional homeless persons in unincorporated areas that did not access H3 services during the reporting period, it can be assumed that the 2,277 homeless persons in the county predominately reside in incorporated areas.As discussed in the Housing Needs Assessment, the County Health Services Department (HSD) develops plans and programs to assist people experiencing homelessness throughout Contra Costa County. These efforts include a 2014 update to the “Ending Homelessness in Ten Years: A County-Wide Plan for Communities of Contra Costa County” and developing the plan “Forging Ahead Towards Preventing and Ending Homelessness.” The County’s Fiscal Year 2021/22 Action Plan identifies the following actions to address homelessness:xUse Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds for homeless street outreach, emergency shelters, homelessness prevention, rapid re-housing assistance, and data collection.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-83xTarget CDBG funds to support public service activities for homelessness and those at risk of homelessness, including allocating funds for operating expenses of an emergency shelter, providing a homeless hotline, housing counseling and legal services, and food distribution.xAllocate funding for Contra Costa County Health Services Coordinated Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (CORE) Homeless Street Outreach Program.To support and further these efforts, the County has included Action HE-A7.6 to allow low-barrier navigation centers in all zones that allow mixed-use and nonresidential zones that allow multi-family uses and Actions HE-A3.1, HE-A3.4, and HE-A5.2 to encourage and prioritize development of housing for extremely low-income households.Displacement RiskThe annual rate of increase in average home value or rental prices compared with annual changes in the average income in the County may also indicate an increased risk of displacement due to housing costs outpacing wage increases, a trend that is felt throughout the region, state, and nation. According to Zillow, the average home value in Contra Costa County has increased 17.1 percent annually since 2011. While housing costs have increased rapidly, wages have not kept pace. The average income in Contra Costa County has increased approximately 3 percent annually, from $78,385 in 2010 to $99,716 in 2019 according to the ACS. The difference in these trends indicates the growing unaffordability of housing in Contra Costa County. To address affordability challenges, the County will encourage and incentivize the development of affordable housing units, particularly in high-opportunity areas, and will develop a program to connect lower-income residents with affordable housing opportunities (see Table 6-38). Displacement risk increases when a household is paying more for housing than their income can support, their housing condition is unstable or unsafe, and when the household is overcrowded. Each of these presents barriers to stable housing for the occupants. In Contra Costa County, overpayment is pervasive and is not necessarily linked to areas with a lower median income. However, as discussed under Patterns of Integration and Segregation, there are higher poverty rates near North Richmond and Bay Point. As shown in Figures 6-9 and 6-10, the overpayment rate is slightly higher in these areas of the county. The County has included Actions HE-A3.1, HE-A3.5, HE-A5.2, HE-A6.6, and HE-A7.1 to provide financial assistance and other incentives for construction of lower-income rental and ownership opportunities, promoting ADU construction in high resource areas, and encouraging flexibility in lot consolidation and development. Additionally, the County will pursue developing affordable housing on County-owned land (Action HE-A3.2) and expanding homeownership opportunities for lower-income households (Action HE-A5.1).Other Relevant FactorsHousing and Demographic TrendsSince 2010, vacancy rates have decreased across unincorporated Contra Costa County, likely increasing the demand for the existing housing stock. In 2010, many unincorporated communities had vacancy rates greater than 10 percent, including Bethel Island (22.7 percent), Diablo (13.0 percent), Discovery Bay (13.0 percent), North Richmond (17.0 percent), and Norris Canyon (10.5 percent). By 2020, the vacancy rate in all but 8 communities
6-84 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementhad dropped to 5 percent or less, with 13 communities having a vacancy rate of less than 3 percent, which typically reflects an impacted housing market. In unincorporated Contra Costa County, the percentage of renter-occupied households has increased very slightly since 2000, from 27 to 29 percent of households, indicating that the decrease in vacancy rates has not altered the proportion of owner and renter households.Across unincorporated Contra Costa County, there was a decrease in two-unit housing structures since 2010, while there was an increase in all other housing types. The greatest increase was in multi-family structures with 5 to 9 units (21.9 percent increase in the stock) and structures with 10 to 19 units (27.0 percent increase in the stock). This focus on increasing the supply of multi-family units may have assisted in the increase in the percentage of renter-occupied households and provides a greater variety of housing options than single-family homes, which are often unaffordable to lower-income households.History of Development and InvestmentAs with most of the Bay Area, early development in Contra Costa County was shaped by industrial uses and investment, including shipping and railway transportation of materials and products and the construction of freeways. This development in Contra Costa County began in the early 1900s in the western and northern portions of the county, where there was access to shipping ports and the construction of the Union Pacific Railroad. By the mid-1900s, freeway construction further influenced nearby communities. Throughout the United States, freeways were built through and sometimes displaced, lower-income communities that often contained concentrations of Black or Hispanic residents. This was no different in Contra Costa County. Interstate 80 and State Route 4 were constructed through and around many communities, altering the landscape. While many of these communities are those that have concentrated poverty and non-White populations today, freeway development in Contra Costa County did not exclusively result in these patterns. Interstate 680 also bisects several communities, but these are primarily affluent suburban communities in the central and southern portions of the county, indicating that it is likely that early heavy industrial uses may have played a greater role in development patterns than freeway construction.Older communities in Contra Costa County, particularly those that have their roots in shipping, are those that today have greater concentrations of lower-income households and non-White persons than suburban communities in the central county. Outreach participants also emphasized the role that NIMBYism played in shaping the county in terms of new development, often resulting in concentrations of lower-income households in the aging and industrial adjacent locales. Many of these areas are susceptible to gentrification, according to the Urban Displacement Project. Therefore, the County has included Action HE-A3.2 to address development of affordable housing on County-owned land in Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo and Action HE-A8.1 to target place-based revitalization through community-based programs rather than new development in areas of concentrated poverty. Public HousingPublic housing provides a safe and affordable option for lower-income households, seniors, and persons with disabilities who may otherwise encounter challenges securing and affording housing. As reported in the County AI, the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County (HACCC) owns approximately 1,177 public housing units in 14 developments throughout
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-85the county, in addition to administering the Housing Choice Voucher program. Public housing in unincorporated areas is located in Rodeo and the City of Brentwood Sphere of Influence. HUD reported that, throughout Contra Costa County, Black residents comprise approximately 55.0 percent of residents in the public housing developments, despite comprising only 9.0percent of the Contra Costa County Consortium’s total population. In contrast, White and Hispanic populations are underrepresented in public housing compared to the total population. The Urban Displacement Project identified all locations of public housing in Contra Costa County as the more urbanized western and northern cities and unincorporated communities, with no public housing in central and southern Contra Costa County. The discrepancy in where public housing is located may inform tenants’ demographics, as there are higher concentrations of Black and African American residents in western and northern areas than in southern and central Contra Costa County. This may indicate that either residents of central and southern regions do not have access to public housing and are therefore underrepresented, or there is a greater need among Black residents than in other populations. To ensure that all eligible residents, regardless of location, race, or ethnicity, have access to safe and affordable housing, the County has included Action HEA-3.2 to develop affordable housing on County-owned land, Action HE-A3.4 to assist with the acquisition and rehabilitation of rental units by affordable housing providers, prioritizing projects in high resource areas, and Action HE-A8.1 to facilitate place-based revitalization through community efforts to encourage resident retention. Homeownership TrendsAccording to findings of the County AI, areas with high concentrations of non-Hispanic White residents tend to have the highest homeownership rates. In contrast, communities with concentrations of Black and Hispanic residents have the lowest homeownership rates. Typically, communities in the western, urbanized portion of the county have the lowest homeownership rates, aligning with those areas with lower median incomes, further proximity to jobs, and greater concentrations of non-White residents. In the suburban communities of central Contra Costa County, where there is greater job access and higher median incomes, there are higher rates of homeownership. While this trend is true for most of the county, Bayview, in the western county with a predominantly non-White population, has a high homeownership rate. In Bayview, approximately 92.5 percent of housing units are owner-occupied, according to the 2015-2019 ACS. Of all units in Bayview, just 24 (3.8 percent) are less than 40 years old; 96.2 percent of units were built before 1980. Older housing units are typically more affordable. In 2019, the ACS estimated the Bayview home value was $479,300, and all Bayview homes are single-family structures. Therefore, this community may be a more affordable option for lower- and moderate-income households seeking homeownership opportunities than other western communities with fewer single-family homes or higher home values. However, breakout session participants discussed the situation facing many potential lower-income homeowners in that more affordable housing units such as these often are in stages of dilapidation, and the resources necessary to rehabilitate these structures make the goal of homeownership unattainable.
6-86 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element3. Enforcement and Outreach CapacityCompliance with Fair Housing LawsContra Costa County enforces and complies with fair housing laws and regulations through a twofold process: regular review of County policies and code for compliance with State law, and referring fair housing complaints to appropriate agencies. Contra Costa County refers fair housing complaints to ECHO Housing (“ECHO”). ECHO provides housing counseling services, and tenant/landlord services conducts fair housing investigations, and operates periodic fair housing audits throughout Contra Costa County, including unincorporated areas. Additionally, ECHO provides counseling and assistance for first-time homebuyers and lower-income households seeking housing.The County does not have a formal process currently to disseminate information about fair housing laws. However, Action HE-A8.1 has been included to provide information in County buildings and on the County’s website regarding fair housing rights, requirements, and resources for residents, landlords, and property managers. This information will be updated at least annually. In addition, the County demonstrates compliance or intention to comply with fair housing laws through the following:xThe County demonstrates compliance with Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code, Section 65915.) through its density bonus ordinance, which currently allows for an increase of 5 to 35 percent over the maximum allowable residential density. Assembly Bills 2753, 2372, 1763, 1227, and 2345 were passed in 2018, 2019, and 2020 and revised density bonus law to provide additional benefits for qualifying projects. The County has included Action HE-A6.4 to update the density bonus ordinance to be consistent with recent State law. xThe County intends to comply with No-Net-Loss (Gov. Code Section 65863) through identifying a surplus of sites available to meet the County’s RHNA allocation. In total, the County’s surplus unit capacity is 2,485 units, composed of 844 lower-income units, 343 moderate-income units, and 1,299 above moderate-income units. xThe County complies with the Housing Accountability Act (Gov. Code, Section 65589.5) by allowing emergency shelters by right in the General Commercial District.xThe County will comply with SB 35 (Gov. Code Section 65913.4) by establishing a written policy or procedure, as well as other guidance as appropriate, to streamline the approval process and standards for eligible projects by 2022 (Action HE-A7.6).xThe County will comply with SB 330 (Gov. Code Section 65589.5), relying on regulations outlined in the law for processing preliminary applications for housing development projects, conducting no more than five hearings for housing projects that comply with objective General Plan and development standards, and making a decision on a residential project within 90 days after certification of an environmental impact report or 60 days after adoption of a mitigated negative declaration or an environmental impact report for an affordable housing project.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-87Housing Discrimination CasesIn October 2021, ECHO provided fair housing case numbers for fiscal years 2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021. During fiscal year 2018-2019, ECHO recorded all cases reported from most incorporated jurisdictions (excluding Antioch, Concord, and Walnut Creek) and unincorporated areas as originating in “Urban County.” Therefore, for this year, case numbers may not accurately represent residents in unincorporated areas. In fiscal years 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, ECHO reported cases by community. The cases received are presented in Table 6-36. Most fair housing cases were filed for incidences of discriminatoin based on race and disability..TABLE 6-36 ECHO HOUSING FAIR HOUSING CASES, 2018-2021GeographyRaceDisabilityReligionFamilial StatusIncome SourceGeneral Information RequestOtherFFiscall Yearr 2018--22019 Urban County723 1 1 15 5FFiscall Yearr 2019--22020 Bay Point141Discovery Bay111Alamo1Crockett11Rodeo1FFiscall Yearr 2020--22021 Discovery Bay2Alamo2El Sobrante11Data Source: ECHO Housing, 2021
6-88 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementIn its 2019 Annual Report, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) reported 22 housing complaints from residents of all of Contra Costa County, not just unincorporated areas. This was approximately 2.4 percent of the total number of cases in the state that year (934). Due to confidentiality, DFEH does not report the specific origin of cases within the county. However, as part of the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP), some DFEH cases are dual-filed with HUD’s Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO), which can identify the specific jurisdiction orcommunity from which a complaint originates. According to HUD’s Region IX FHEO, 17 fair housing discrimination cases were filed with and accepted by HUD from unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County between January 1, 2013, and March 24, 2021. As shown in Table 6-37, most cases originated from Bay Point, though disability discrimination was the most common reason for the alleged discrimination. No cases were reported in communities not listed in the table during the reporting timeframe. The percentages total more than 100 percent because some cases claimed multiple reasons. In addition to these cases, 34 inquiries with known and unknown reasons for the alleged discrimination were sent to HUD to determine their validity. In reviewing these cases, 13 failed to respond to HUD’s follow-up, and 21 were found not to have a valid basis. Of these inquiries, 10 were inquiries against a public entitity in the county.TABLE 6-37 HUD FAIR HOUSING CASES, 2013-2021GeographyNational OriginReligionFamilial StatusDisabilityRaceRetaliationSexTotalBay Point211721014Bethel Island11Crockett112Rodeo11Discovery Point11Pacheco11El Sobrante11 2TTotal 22 11 22 111 33 22 11 222 Source: HUD FHEO, 2021*As some cases alleged multiple bases of discrimination, the total reports of each form of discrimination total more than 100%.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-89Accessibility of OutreachThe necessity to identify ways to implement more widespread outreach efforts with the intent to connect underrepresented and low-income groups into the planning effort was reiterated in outreach dialogues. Approximately6 percent of the population 5 years and older in unincorporated Contra Costa County speaks English “not well” or “not at all,” according to the 2015-2019 ACS. This is made up of approximately 10,600 residents who require translation services to be able to participate in public engagement events and processes. To meet this need, the County provides Spanish translation at all Board of Supervisor meetings and other languages by request. To ensure all residents have equal access to participate in outreach efforts, the County will promote the availability of translation services by, at least annually, distributing information and how to access these services to community organizations and on the County’s website in multiple languages (AActionn HE-A8.1).4. Sites Inventory AnalysisThe location of housing in relation to resources and opportunities is integral to addressing disparities in housing needs and opportunities and to fostering inclusive communities where all residents have access to opportunities. This is particularly important for lower-income households. AB 686 added a new requirement for housing elements to analyze the location of lower-income sites in relation to areas of high opportunity. Figuress 6-144 and 6-155 show the sites and income categories of units geographically throughout the unincorporated county. Figuress 6-166 throughh 6-27show the distribution of projected units by income category of the following indicators compared to unincorporated countywide patterns to understand how the projected locations of units will affirmatively further fair housing: TCAC opportunity areas, median income, predominant population, familial status, disability rates, educational score, environmental health, and overpayment. The following sites inventory discussion includes an analysis of the number of projected units by income category, total RHNA capacity, and unincorporated county acreage by income category, to further assess the potential impacts of the sites inventory to affirmatively further fair housing. Potential Effects on Patterns of Integration and SegregationFigure 6-16 (Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by TCAC Resources) presents the breakdown of unit capacity in unincorporated Contra Costa County by resource area designation and income category. As seen previously in Figure 6-2 (TCAC Resource Opportunity Areas), the high and highest resource areas in Contra Costa County are within the central and southern portions of the county. The western and northern portions are designated low resource, and areas of moderate resource are scattered in the northwest and eastern areas. Discovery Bay is the only area with high and highest resource designation outsidecentral Contra Costa County.
6-90 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-14 SITES BY INCOME CATEGORY (LOWER, LOWER AND ABOVE MODERATE, MODERATE AND ABOVE MODERATE)Source: Contra Costa County
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-91FIGURE 6-15 SITES BY INCOME CATEGORY (ABOVE MODERATE, MODERATE)Source: Contra Costa County
6-92 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementAs shown in Figure 6-16, 70.5percent of the total unit capacity identified to meet the RHNA is in low- resource areas, and 19.0 percent is in moderate-resource areas (inclusive of 2.0 percent rapidly changing areas) while these areas account for approximately 58.0 percent of the land area in Contra Costa County, with an additional 0.2 percent designated as a moderate resource – rapidly changing. The lower-resource areas are concentrated in North Richmond, San Pablo, North Richmond Heights, and Bay Point, on either side of I-80 in the communities of Bay View, Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, and El Sobrante, along San Francisco and Suisun Bays, where industrial uses and older housing stock are more prevalent, and in the semi-rural community of Byron. The moderate-resource designations in the northern central communities, including the vicinity of Alhambra Valley, Reliez Valley, Briones, Pacheco, portions of Vine Hill, and Contra Costa Centre, are not as densely developed, although infill and use of underutilized school district and church-owned land plays a large role in the identification of available sites.Approximately 7.6 percent of lower-income housing opportunity is within highest and high--resource designations. Approximately 35.4 percent of the total site capacity identified in Discovery Bay is for lower-income units within mixed-income neighborhoods. Additional capacity for lower-income units within a high resource designation is in the vicinity of the Alamo community, with 30.5 percent of the total unit capacity identified in this area for lower-income units. These sites offer an opportunity for lower-income housing mobility and helps reduce potential concentration of lower-income units in other areas of the Unincorporated County. While the Discovery Bay and Alamo sites satisfy 8.9 percent of the total RHNA capacity for unincorporated County, they provide 5.2 percent of the lower-income housing capacity. FIGURE 6-16 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY TCAC RESOURCE AREA DESIGNATIONSource: TCAC/HCD, 2021; Acreage analysis by Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022The majority of lower-income unit capacity, 76.2 percent, is identified within low resource areas, with 16.0 percent of the lower-income unit capacity located within the moderate resource designation. While the site potential in in the communities of Bay Point and the vicinity of West Pittsburg on Suisun 1.9%13.8%3.9%33.7%4.9%15.2%6.6%7.6%2.7%2.7%2.0%0.2%16.0%11.9%23.1%17.0%18.0%76.2%83.5%47.9%70.5%40.0%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%Lower-Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/AcresHighest ResourceHigh ResourceModerate Resource (Rapidly Changing)Moderate ResourceLow Resource
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-93Bay accounts for 31.2 percent of total RHNA unit capacity, approximately 44.1 percent of the lower-income RHNA capacity is satisfied. There are two significant lower-income housing opportunities identified in the sites inventory within this area, satisfying 21.4 percent of the total lower-income RHNA: one large site in north Bay Point provides the potential for 500 lower-income units. Although this area is designated as low resource, new retail, services, and amenities are an integral component in the future development vision of the area. Therefore, locating these units here is not expected to negatively concentrate lower-income residents in areas with limited access to resources The second site identifies the potential for 650 lower-income units just north of SR 4 and the commercial node on Bailey Road at the SR 4 access ramps... These two sites offer a significant housing mobility opportunity for lower-income households.In the central area of the El Sobrante community off of the San Pablo Dam Road, there are numerous individual parcels with the potential for about 10.0 percent of the lower-income RHNA allocation. Although the El Sobrante community is designated as low resource, the potential exists for some of the identified units to be included in mixed-use developments. In addition, there are sites identified to accommodate above moderate-income units satisfying 23.5 percent of the above moderate-income RHNA capacity and additional moderate-income unit capacity within the community, fostering income-integration and housing mobility opportunities for households of all incomes. Other opportunities for meeting the lower-income RHNA allocation are primarily found in the western communities in the vicinity of the I-80 and within the north- central communities in both low- and moderate-resource designations. Within the Montalvin Manor community and adjacent Bay View, several sites have been identified with lower-income housing unit capacity, including two underutilized school district sites for multi-family residential and adjacent acreage proposed for mixed-use, constituting approximately 11.4 percent of the RHNA allocation for lower-income households. These sites are adjacent to sites zoned for mixed-use which are identified for the majority of moderate-income unit capacity in the unincorporated county, asdiscussed below, which will help to revitalize this area of the community, aiming to improve access to resources for residents.Lower-income opportunities identified in central North Richmond count for6.5 percent of unit capacity toward meeting the lower-income RHNA,including several vacant adjacent parcels owned by the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County with potential for affordable multi-family residential, , While located in a low-resource area, this combination of sites in North Richmond will help to revitalize this area of the community, aiming to improve its resource designation. In addition to the abovementioned site consolidation opportunity, other lower-income opportunity sites in North Richmond are scattered throughout the community, many of which are owned by the Housing Authority, which has the potential for smaller multi-family infill complexes. Most scattered sites with potential for lower-income housing are adjacent to identified properties with infill potential for moderate- or above moderate-income units to facilitate a more mixed-income community with proximity to existing and proposed services, transit, and other opportunities to revitalize underutilized areas without risking displacement of existing residents. Mixed-use redevelopment within underutilized and vacant sites along San Pablo Avenue in the community of Rodeo yield 4.1 percent of lower-income -unit capacity with additional individual sites in the vicinity identified for moderate-income units.The West Contra Costa County Unified School District properties, which have been closed, are considered for lower-income units within the East Richmond Heights neighborhoods, provide
6-94 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementadditional lower-income housing unit capacity to meet the RHNA allocation within this designation.Moderate-income unit capacity is also predominantly located within the low resource designation, accounting for 83.5 percent of unit potential in these areas, the majority of which are identified in Bay View and Montalvin Manorwith unit capacity accommodated within potential mixed-use development and mixed-income neighborhoods, comprising 49.1 percent of the total moderate-income RHNA unit count for the unincorporated county. An additional 24.7 percent of the unit capacity towards the moderate-income RHNA is identified in the low resource communities of Bay Point and North Richmond. The remainder of the moderate-income unit capacity within the low resource designation is scattered between the communities of El Sobrante, Byron, and portions of Vine Hill.The distribution of unit capacity within moderate resource communities (17.0 percent of total unit capacity) is fairly comparable to the distribution of moderate resource acreage (18.0 percent) in the unincorporated county. The majority of unit capacity in moderate resource communities is located within Contra Costa Centre and the surrounding areas (74.5 percent of total unit capacity in moderate resource areas). Approximately 64.8 of the unit capacity identified for these Costra Contra Centre sites are lower-income units (17.3 percent of total lower-income RHNA unit capacity), 10.5 percent are moderate-income units (14.9 percent of above moderate-income RHNA unit capacity), and 24.7 percent is above-moderate income unit capacity (8.6 percent of moderate-income RHNA unit capacity); , providing mixed-income housing mobility opportunities with nearby access to a major public transit hub in the central portion of the unincorporated county. Another 18.5percent of the total unit capacity within the moderate resource designation is identified in a portion of the community of Vine Hill, as primarily above moderate-income unit capacity with additional moderate unit capacity is identified on limited sites in Crockett, and 5.9 percent of unit capacity within moderate resource designated areas in Pacheco, including lower-income and moderate-income unit capacity. Although slightly over 41.0 percent of the acreage in the unicorporated county is designated high and highestresource, only 29.0 percent of the above moderate unit capacity is identified in these higher resource communities. Conversely, 71.0 percent of above moderate-income unit capacity is integrated into low and moderate resource areas of the unincorporated county, with concentrations in the Vine Hill, Pacheco, El Sobrante, Bay Pointe and Contra Costa Centre communities, offering an opportunity for above moderate-income housing mobility, while fostering the reduction of concentration of lower-income units in low and moderate resource areas. As discussed previously, a portion of the moderate- and lower-income unit capacity is also integrated into the high resource communities of Discovery Bay and Alamo, providing housing mobility opportunities in high resource communities.There are also a number of sites identified to meet the County’s RHNA which have the capacity to accommodate units at all three income levels – lower, moderate, and above moderate, including mixed-income units in Bay Points and Discovery Bay, helping to facilitate mixed-income neighborhoods andencourage future integration in areas that are currently designated as low and moderate resource.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-95IncomeAs shown in Table 6-33 (Median Income by Unincorporated Area), only six unincorporated areas (Alhambra Valley/Reliez Valley/Briones, Alamo/Castle Hills, Diablo, Kensington, Canyon, and Discovery Bay) have median incomes in the moderate- or above moderate-income range. These areas largely correspond with portions of Contra Costa County that TCAC and HCD have designated as high and highest resource areas, having the most significant anticipated economic outcomes for residents, reflecting distribution of opportunity in more affluent areas. The communities with the highest median income and lowest poverty rates are those in central Contra Costa County and the communities of Kensington and Discovery Bay. Figure 6-17(Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Income Category Rate) identifies where opportunity sites are located by income category in the unincorporated area.Figure 6-17 shows that 73.8 percent of the total RHNA capacity is identified in lower-income communities, which comprise 37.8 percent of unincorporated county acreage. The majority of lower-income housing capacity, 80.0 percent, as well as 89.4 percent of moderate-income capacity, and 48.5 percent of above moderate-income capacity, is located primarily in lower-income communities in the vicinity of North Richmond and Bay Point, as well as western and north-central communities along San Francisco and Suisun Bays, including El Sobrante, East Richmond Heights, Bay View/Montalvin Manor, Crockett, and Rodeo. The inclusion of lower-income housing units in mixed-income housing development helps mitigate existing income patterns through integration.FIGURE 6-17 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY MEDIAN INCOMESource: American Community Survey, 2015-2019; Contra Costa County. Department of Conservation and Development, 2022The remaining lower-income capacity is identified on sites within moderate-income localities in Discovery Bay, in Contra Costa Centre near the Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Centre BART station, in Saranap to the south of Walnut Creek, and the Vine Hill community, with a small cluster of above moderate-income sites near Alamo.As discussed in the Population Characteristics section analyzed previously, the highest rates of poverty are concentrated in the vicinity of North Richmond and Bay Point, and the western unincorporated communities that 80.0%89.4%48.5%73.9%37.8%19.8%9.4%41.9%23.4%38.9%9.5%2.7%23.3%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%Lower-Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/AcresчΨϭϬϵ͕ϲϬϬ;>ŽǁĞƌ-Income)ΨϭϬϵ͕ϲϬϭƚŽΨϭϱϬ͕ϳϬϬ;DŽĚĞƌĂƚĞͲ/ŶĐŽŵĞͿхΨϭϱϬ͕ϳϬϬ;ďŽǀĞDŽĚĞƌĂƚĞͲ/ŶĐŽŵĞͿ
6-96 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementdeveloped in response to the industrial economic base along the waterfront, as well as a presence of extremely low-income households in the more rural and less densely developed north central communities. However, analysis indicates that while lower-income households may have concentrated in coastal communities for more affordable housing costs, all communities are expected to become unaffordable without intervention. In addition, outreach input disclosed that NIMBYism has had a significant impact on the type and distribution of affordable housing resources and resulting concentrations of lower-income and populations in poverty in the western portion of the county. Figure 6-18 (Percentage Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Percentage of Population Below the Poverty Line) identifies the poverty rate in the unincorporated area and where the opportunity sites are located for comparison. As shown in Figure 6-18, 58.2 percent of the total site opportunities are identified in areas where the poverty rate is below 10 percent. In contrast, this rate exists within 75.3 percent of the unincorporated county. Although 21.9 percent of the acreage within the unincorporated county has a population that falls within the poverty range of 10.0 to 19.9 percent, 35.4 percent of the total RHNA sites are within these areas. Comparatively, 45.3 percent of the lower-income capacity sites are determined in these higher-poverty areas. Further, while 2.6 percent of the unincorporated area’s acreage falls within the 20.0 to 29.9 percent poverty range, 6.4 percent of the total RHNA capacity is within these areas, with 6.5percent of the lower-income capacity, 11.0 percent of the moderate-income capacity, and 2.7 percent of above moderate-income capacity sited on properties within portions of communities with 20.0 to 29.9 percent poverty. However, most of these sites are the properties owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority in Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo, and the introduction of moderate- and above-moderate-income housing opportunties in these areas promotes income integration and helps reduce the concentration of populations in poverty. While there is a TCAC Area of High Segregation and Poverty in Martinez, no sites have been identified in this area.FIGURE 6-18 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION BELOW THE POVERTY LINESource: US Census, 2019; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022Note: There are no areas in Contra Costa County in which 40.0 percent or more of the population is below the poverty line.48.2%66.1%74.9%58.2%75.3%45.3%22.9%22.4%35.4%21.9%6.5%11.0%2.7%6.4%2.6%0.1%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%Lower-Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres<10.0% of the population10.0% to 19.9% of the population20.0% to 29.9% of the population30.0% to 39.9% of the population
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-97While much of the lower-income site capacity is in Bay Point, El Sobrante, North Richmond, Rodeo, and Montalvin Manor, it is important to note two things. First, while only a small portion of the unincorporated area has an extremely high rate of poverty, over 20 percent, with approximately 22.0percent of the unincorporated area with a poverty rate between 10.0 and 19.9 percent, much of the inland unincorporated area is either not populated at all, or sparsely populated. This suggests that the land along San Francisco and Suisun Bay in the vicinity of I-80, State Route 4, and I-680 may comprise a higher percentage of the populated areas and more closely reflect the RHNA. Second, the distribution of sites in the communities with access to I-80 and State Route 4, as well as I-680, are supported by commercial uses and services, and connections to the BART and bus services, thus increasing access to opportunity regardless of current income distributions. According to stakeholders, many lower-income households are currently concentrated in the western, north central, and inland central areas due to low housing costs, but not necessarily good housing conditions. The identification of the lower-income unit capacity in Discovery Bay and near Alamo provides housing mobility opportunities in high resource areas and areas with higher median incomes to promote, rather than concentrating affordable housing in the lower resource communities in the unincorporated county. In contrast, the inclusion of moderate- and above moderate-income infill sites or a mix of income households in the portions of the unincorporated areas where the majority of lower-income sites are identified can stimulate redevelopment and revitalization of neighborhood conditions through income integration, thus potentially attracting an influx of supporting services and housing options, increasing resource opportunities.The distribution of wealth in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area has resulted in areas of exclusivity, presenting barriers to economic and housing mobility for lower-income households that would facilitate integration. To address barriers to economic mobility for lower-income residents and proactively counter the anticipated gentrification in many lower-income communities, the County will implement Action HE-3.1 to provide financial assistance and other incentives for affordable rental and ownership opportunities; Action HE-A3.2 to develop affordable housing on County-owned land in Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo; Action HE-A5.1 to encourage construction of ADUs as a potential affordable housing option in high resource and potentially exclusive areas such as the Alhambra Valley, Reliez Valley, Briones, Alamo, and Castle Hill areas; expand homeownership opportunities for lower-income households (Action HE-A5.1); and Action HE-A8.1 to target place-based revitalization through community-based programs rather than development in areas of concentrated poverty. Race and EthnicityAs presented in the Housing Needs Assessment of this Housing Element, unincorporated Contra Costa County is ethnically and racially mixed, although it is not necessarily integrated. In communities closer to San Francisco Bay, diversity is higher, with a predominantly Hispanic/Latinx population in Bay Point, Pittsburg, Antioch, North Richmond, Tara Hills, Montalvin Manor, and Rollingwood, generally corresponding to the current concentration of lower-income households. In contrast, the central and eastern portions of the unincorporated county are predominantly White. The patterns of concentrations of non-White populations find minority populations predominantly in dense urban and historically industrial areas near the San Francisco Bay, with a larger presence of White persons in
6-98 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementinland, suburban communities. Predominantly Asian households are found in the eastern portion of Rodeo, southwest of San Ramon and Danville, and between the cities of Pittsburg and Concord. The areas in unincorporated Contra Costa County that are predominantly African American or Black are east of Pittsburg.Approximately 43.9 percent of the units identified to meet the entire RHNA are identified in areas that are predominantly White, with 56.1 percent in areas that are predominantly Hispanic/Latinx, whereas land patterns indicate that 7.7 percent of total unincorporated county acreage is predominantly Hispanic/Latinx and 83.8 percent is predominantly White. The remainder is predominantly Asian or Black, although no sites are identified in those areas. As supported by the 2015-2019 ACS, and corroborated by stakeholders,many of the Hispanic/Latinx households are lower income, 12.9 percent experience overcrowding, and approximately 44.0 percent overpay for housing, therefore suggesting these households are a community in need of affordable housing options. The inclusion of 65.5 percent of lower-income units and 77.1 percent of moderate-income units in areas of high diversity will help meet this need while enabling residents to remain in their community with continued access to their employment, public transportation, and interstate system, while the 34.5 percent of lower-income units and 22.9 percent of moderate-income units in areas of lower diversity will promote housing mobility opportunities that may help to increase diversity in areas of greater affluence. The inclusion of 19.1 percent of above moderate-income units in areas of high diversity may achieve a similar goal by reducing the concentration of minority and lower-income households through mixed neighborhoods.FIGURE 6-19 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PREDOMINANT POPULATIONSource: US Census, 2019; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022Familial StatusAs discussed in earlier sections, there is a higher percentage of children in Contra Costa County than in the overall region. A higher rate of married couples with children households tends to correlate with suburban communities with high TCAC resource ranking. The concentration of female-headed households is highest in Rodeo/Crockett west of I-80 and in Martinez, where more than 40.0 percent of households are female, single-parent households. In these areas, approximately 19.0 percent of 7.3%1.2%65.5%77.1%19.1%56.1%7.7%34.5%22.9%80.9%43.9%83.8%0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Lower-Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/AcresPredominantly AsianPredominantly Black/African AmericanPredominantly Hispanic/LatinxPredominantly White
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-99households live below the poverty line. Additionally, rates above 20.0 percent of female-headed households with no husband7with children generally correlate to lower resource communities and higher rates of poverty, similar to many of the previous indicators. These areas suggest a possible concentration of female-headed households living below the poverty line and a greater need for affordable housing with an appropriate number of bedrooms. Approximately 42.5 percent of lower-income, 76.7 percent of moderate-income, and 15.8 percent of above moderate-income capacity, for a total of 43.2. percent of the RHNA, are identified on sites with rates of single female householders with children above 20.0 percent. However, only 10.6 percent of the total unincorporated county acreage falls within this designation (Figure 6-20, Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Female-Headed Households with Children). The integration of moderate- and above moderate-income unit capacity in these areas may help reduce the concentrations of both single female-headed households and the often associated poverty rate, as discussed previously. Most of the unincorporated area land (55.5 percent) has a rate of single female householders with children below 10.0 percent. Total RHNA capacity within these predominantly married couple household areas is 28.7 percent, meeting 31.7 percent of lower-income, 13.9 percent of moderate-income, and 32.9percent of above moderate-income unit capacity. On approximately 34.0 percent of the land in the unincorporated areas, 10.0 to 19.9 percent of households are single female householders with children. In these areas, sites have been identified to meet 34.0 percent of the total RHNA unit 7This terminology is directly from the Census data.capacity, providing opportunities for 28.1 percent of above moderate-income, 9.4 percent of moderate-income, and 25.8 percent of lower-income unit capacity.FIGURE 6-20 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDRENSource: American Community Survey, 2015-2019; Contra Costa County. Department of Conservation and Development, 202231.7%13.9%32.9%28.7%55.5%25.8%9.4%47.5%28.1%34.0%38.5%72.9%3.8%36.3%6.6%15.0%3.7%1.8%4.0%3.8%0.8%3.2%2.2%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 10.0% of households10.0% to 19.9% of households20.0% to 29.9% of households30.0% to 39.9% of householdsшϰϬ͘ϬйŽĨŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ
6-100 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementDisability RateApproximately 20.0 percent of the population in the unincorporated area lives with at least one disability. Persons with disabilities are often underserved in locating housing to meet their accessibility needs and affordability range. More urbanized areas with higher density of population, often along the bay and in downtown areas, have slightly higher rates of disability possibly due to a concentration of accessible housing, proximity to transit, and the availability of medical and support resources in these areas.As shown in Figure 6-21 (Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Percent of Population with a Disability), approximately 29.0 percent of the land area in the unincorporated area has a population disability rate between 10.0 and 14.9 percent, and 15.5 percent of the land area has a population disability rate between 15.0 and 19.9 percent. Unincorporated communities with disability rates within this range include El Sobrante, Tara Hills, Montalvin Manor, North Richmond, East Richmond Heights, Rodeo, Crockett, Bay Point, Discovery Bay, Byron, and portions of Vine Hill and Pacheco. Only 1.4 percent of unincorporated county land has a disability rate of over 20.0 percent and no RHNA capacity has been identified within this area. Approximately 64.0 percent of the RHNA capacity is sited in areas with a 10.0 to 14.9 percent disability rate, accounting for 71.8 percent of the lower-income, and 81.9 percent of the moderate-income, yet slightly lower rates, 32.7 percent, of the above moderate-income unit capacity are indicated. An additional 7.6percent of lower-income, 1.9 percent of moderate-income, and 20.8 percent of above moderate-income capacity, equivalent to 9.8 percent of total RHNA capacity, is sited on acreage reflecting a population with a 15.0 to 19.9 percent disability rate. Although over half of the unincorporated county acreage (54.1 percent) has a rate of disability below 10.0 percent, 26.2 percent of the RHNA is identified within these areas, including 16.2 percent of moderate-income capacity, 46.5percent of above moderate-income, and 20.6 percent of lower-income capacity. This rate is reported within the unincorporated communities of Alamo, Saranap, Contra Costa Centre, and portions of Vine Hill and Pacheco. The identification of units within communities with lower incidence of disabilities helps to reduce concentration of persons experiencing disabilities in other portions of the unincorporated county and provide housing mobility opportunities in areas higher access to resources and lower rates of associated poverty, potentially in mixed-use developments. The allocation of lower- and moderate-income units to meet the RHNA generally responds to the pattern of the 10.0 to 20.0 percent disability rate by acreage in the unincorporated areas, with the intent of meeting needs where residents are located to reduce displacement risk from their communities. Further, the sites to meet the allocation are near the incorporated jurisdictions, thus facilitating improved access to transit, the interstate system, medical services, and amenities for persons with disabilities.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-101FIGURE 6-21 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION WITH A DISABILITYSource: American Community Survey 2015-2019; Contra Costa County. Department of Conservation and Development, 2022Potential Effects on Access to OpportunityEmployment OpportunitiesAs discussed in earlier sections, HUD’s jobs proximity index indicates that the census tracts closest to employment opportunities are in the central portion of the county (see Figure 6-7). The communities with the furthest proximity to jobs (an index score below the 20th percentile), comprising 29.1 percent of total county acreage, are located in the northwest and northeast portions of the county, including Bay Point, West Pittsburg, and areas east and south of Antioch to the county line, as well as Discovery Bay. Except for Discovery Bay, these communities generally have higher concentrations of non-White residents than central and southern portions of the county. While there are jobs available in these areas, there are few large employers given the density of population, which may require residents to commute to other areas of the county or into the greater Bay Area for employment. As presented by Figure 6-22 (Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Jobs Proximity Index Score), 45.2 percent of the total RHNA capacity is identified in the areas discussed above, accounting for 49.3percent of the lower-income, 16.0 percent of the moderate-income, and 28.8percent of the above moderate-income capacity. These sites are primarily within Discovery Bay and Bay Point. Communities with Jobs Proximity Index scores within the 20 to 39th percentile range include North Richmond, El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, and Rodeo. Approximately 32.7 percent of RHNA capacity is identified in these areas, with potential capacity for 28.2 percent of lower-income units, 58.9 percent of the moderate-income units, and 23.1 percent of above moderate-income units. Although the greatest portion (45.2 percent) of the unincorporated county is within 3.6%20.6%16.2%46.5%26.2%50.5%71.8%81.9%32.7%64.0%29.0%7.6%1.9%20.8%9.8%15.5%1.4%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres4.9% or Less of the population5.0% to 9.9% of the population10.0% to 14.9% of the population15.0% to 19.9% of the populationшϮϬ͘ϬйŽĨƚŚĞƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
6-102 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementthe 40th to 59th percentile range, a comparatively small percentage of the total RHNA unit capacity (8.4 percent) is identified within this percentile, including 3.0 percent of lower-income unit capacity, 9.6 percent of moderate-income unit capacity, and a slightly higher proportion of above moderate-income unit capacity, 17.9 percent. Approximately 20.9 percent of the units (15.5 percent moderate-income, 30.2 percent above moderate-income, and 22.5 percent lower-income) are anticipated in areas with scores at or above the 60th percentile, higher than the unincorporated county acreage of 13.7 percent.FIGURE 6-22 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY JOBS PROXIMITY INDEX SCORESource: HUD, 2020; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022While a greater share of lower- and moderate-income units are projected in areas scoring below the 39th percentile, additional strategies included in this Housing Element, such as HE-P2.2 (encourage and provide incentives for the production of housing near public transportation and services) and HE-A5.4 (making additional mixed-use sites available for residential development housing in close proximity to key services such as transportation, and continue to encourage mixed-use development where appropriate by offering flexible development standards), will ensure improved mobility opportunities for all residents. Additionally, the incorporation of units at all income levels as mixed-use infill and redevelopment of underutilized sites, including school and church sites, many of which are serviced by public transit routes, BART stations, and the interstate system, will aid in improving access to employment opportunity, providing close proximity to transit for occupants of these units. This distribution improves access to mixed-income communities and increases mobility opportunities in higher-resource areas, particularly within Discovery Bay and Alamo. Additionally, many of the sites identified in the inventory are currently underutilized, which may indicate that the area is not built out to its fullest potential for office, service, or commercial uses for a greater supply of jobs or residential uses for improved access to nearby job opportunities. Additionally, many of the identified sites will be developed as mixed-use, contributing to revitalization of commercial areas and providing improved accessibility to employment opportunities. When considering where to locate future housing for all income levels, particularly lower-income units, the western portion of the county and sites in the vicinity of I-680 offer the most convenient access to jobs and transit to other parts of the Bay Area. Further, construction of these sites will help improve the jobs-housing ratio with residential development in and near commercial and transit corridors as well as mixed-use development, thus improving job proximity for current and future residents of Contra Costa 49.3%16.0%28.8%38.0%29.1%28.2%58.9%23.1%32.7%11.9%3.9%9.6%17.9%8.4%45.2%2.2%1.8%0.9%7.7%18.6%13.3%28.4%20.0%6.1%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 20th percentile20th to 39th percentiles40th to 59th percentiles60th to 79th percentilesшϴϬƚŚƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝůĞ
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-103County. To further promote these programs and services and improve access to employment opportunities for lower-income and non-White residents, particularly in areas identified as having more limited access, the County has included Action HE-A7.1 to promote services provided by the Workforce Development Board and facilitates improved access to these services in communities of need. Educational OpportunitiesAreas in central Contra Costa County with greater affluence have higher school proficiency and, in turn, areas with lower median incomes (typically the coastal communities) have lower school proficiency index scores, higher rates of of chronic absenteeism, and higher rates of socially disadvantaged students. In western and northern county communities, schools are typically lower performing than in central and southern areas of the county. When race and ethnicity are overlaid with lower school proficiency, analysis found that lower-income households and more highly diverse populations are concentrated in neighborhoods with low school proficiency scores, and more limited access to resources, as indicated by the correlation between performance standards, chronic absenteeism, and socially disadvantaged students with income.As shown in Figure 6-22 (Percentage of Unit Capacity and County Acreage by Education Domain Score), approximately 3.8 percent of the unincorporated county’s total capacity to meet the RHNA is on sites in areas that score above the 75th percentile in the expected educational outcome, although 40.9 percent of the unincorporated county’s land falls into this category. Approximately 79.4 percent of lower-income units, 83.9 percent of moderate-income units, and 59.4 percent of above moderate-income units meeting 75.3 percent of the total RHNA capacity, are identified in areas with standardized test scores below the Education Domain 50th percentile score., While this generally includes areas with the highest concentration of socioeconomically disadvantaged students, including Bay Point, El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, Vine Hill, and Pacheco, the integration of moderate- and above moderate-income unit capacity in these areas may have the potential to improve the educational outcomes. While the sites inventory does not necessarily locate units, at all incomes, near high-performing schools, the County has included the following actions to improve school quality near housing: xHE-A2.5: Promote ADU construction in high resource areas to create housing mobility opportunities.xHE-A7.1: Work with school districts to develop strategies to improve access to high-performing schools, and work with the Housing Authority to encourage landlords throughout the county, but particularly in high resource areas where there are high performing schools, to advertise their units for voucher holders.Additionally, the identification of new affordable opportunities in areas with high rates of poverty, as well as within higher performing moderate and higher scoring communities including Conta Costa Centre, Discovery Bay, and Alamo may also provide stabilized home environments for students to help reduce pressure at school and improve educational opportunities for all students.It is important to note here that lower standardized test scores do not indicate limited educational opportunities as much as they indicate lower access to those opportunities than students in wealthier neighborhoods have had. To ensure that development of these units does not concentrate lower-income households in certain neighborhoods and instead more evenly
6-104 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementdistributes socioeconomic diversity across the county, the Housing Element includes a set of housing programs to increase housing opportunity for extremely low-income households, including Action HE-A7.1 to expand Housing Choice Voucher usage throughout the county and encourage affordable housing in high resource areas.FIGURE 6-23 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY EDUCATIONAL DOMAIN SCORESource: TCAC/HCD, 2021; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022Environmental HealthUnder SB 535, the communities of Bay Point, Rodeo, Crockett, Montalvin Manor, and Bayview are considered disadvantaged due to exposure to environmental contaminants. These communities are also considered disadvantaged under SB 1000 as well as Tara Hills, Vine Hill, and Mountain View, which scores areas under eight exposure risks (SB 535), in addition to considering historic discrimination, negligence, and political and economic disempowerment that often result in a disproportionate burden of pollution and health impacts in these communities. Each of the disadvantaged communities has its roots in heavy industrial and manufacturing uses given their locations along railway tracks and near ports for shipment of raw materials and products and, later, their proximity to freeways. The combined impact of these factors has led to pollution and unhealthy environmental conditions for residents, resulting in a persistent fair housing issue of concentrating lower-income and non-White households in areas of poor environmental quality. Approximately 23.1 percent of the acreage in the unincorporated county scores above the 60th percentile score. As a result, approximately 51.8 percent of the sites inventory capacity is in neighborhoods scoring in the 60th percentile and above. Approximately 36.1 percent of the total unit capacity is identified in highly environmentally impacted communities, including North Richmond and Rodeo, which are considered Environmental Justice Communities (Impacted Communities). These are near highly industrialized areas, which may have resulted in poor environmental conditions, though the areas are otherwise prime for redevelopment with a large portion of the sites owned by the Housing Authority and near transit and job opportunities. Redevelopment and revitalization of these portions of the unincorporated county is expected to improve the environmental health of neighborhoods. Investment in this area through redevelopment efforts will facilitate place-based revitalization and will increase the supply of affordable housing in an area susceptible to displacement due to housing costs while also encouraging income integration in new development, with 18.8 percent of above moderate-68.3%35.0%44.4%56.2%30.3%11.1%48.9%15.0%19.1%18.8%18.6%15.0%30.7%20.9%10.0%2.0%1.1%9.9%3.8%40.9%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 0.250.25 to 0.490.5 to 0.74> 0.75
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-105income and 79.3 percent of moderate-income units also located in environmentally challenged areas. Conversely, 32.2 percent of the RHNA, including 33.0 percent of lower-income, 17.7 percent of moderate-income, and 41.6 percent of above moderate-income capacity is anticipated to occur on sites with CalEnviroScreen scores below the 40th percentile, particularly in the Discovery Bay, East Richmond Heights, portions of El Sobrante and Alamo communities, therefore promoting housing mobility to environmentally healthy areas.FIGURE 6-23 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY CALENVIROSCREEN SCORESource: OEHHA, CalEPA, CalEnviroScreen 2021; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022Potential Effects on Displacement RiskOvercrowdingAs discussed previously, overcrowding is not a significant problem in most of the Unincorporated Areas, although the increased rate of overcrowding seen in the western portion of the county reflects the experience reported by members of the public during the outreach process. Participants expressed that high housing costs and difficulties in securing housing with a poor rental history can present a barrier to securing housing at an affordable price that meets the needs of the household.Only 2.6 percent of the total unincorporated county acreage has a rate of overcrowding over 10.0 percent of households, in areas in the North Richmond, Montalvin Manor, Bayview, and Bay Point communities. It is likely that the rates of overcrowding by tenure in these communities follow the patterns of the overall unincorporated county and have higher rates of renter overcrowding than owner. However, approximately 43.4 percent of lower-income units, 24.5 percent of moderate-income units, and 15.3percent of above moderate-income units, for 32.9 percent of the total RHNA capacity, are identified in these communities with higher rates of overcrowding to help to alleviate this issue by increasing the housing supply for a range of households. A significant portion of the total lower-income capacity (40.6 percent), and 28.6 percent of the moderate-income capacity, as well as 81.8 percent of the above moderate-income units are sited in areas with less than 5.0 percent overcrowding, accounting for 48.6 percent of total RHNA capacity. The remainder of the RHNA capacity (18.5 percent), including 46.9 percent of the moderate-income unit capacity, is anticipated in areas with incidence of overcrowding between 5.0 and 9.9 percent. This 23.4%11.4%38.1%24.8%50.4%9.6%6.3%3.5%7.4%10.3%9.6%3.0%39.6%15.8%16.2%20.7%16.8%3.5%15.7%18.4%36.6%62.5%15.3%36.1%4.7%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 2020 to 39.940 to 59.960 to 79.980 to 100
6-106 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Elementwill facilitate housing mobility opportunities in areas of the unincorporated county with lower overcrowding rates near services and resources adjacent to incorporated areas. Additionally, the sites will ease pressure on the housing stock, thus potentially reducing displacement risk and overcrowding, as more units become available.FIGURE 6-25 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PERCENTAGE OF OVERCROWDED HOUSEHOLDSSource: California Health and Human Services (CHHS), 2020 Contra Costa CountyDepartment of Conservation and Development, 2022Cost BurdenAs discussed previously, in unincorporated Contra Costa County, 23.7 percent of renters and 16.8 percent of owners are cost burdened, while 21.6 percent of renters and 12.0 percent of owners are severely cost burdened (Table 6-35). Generally, communities of color households experience higher rates of cost burden than White and Asian households, and renters experience higher rates overall than owners.While 80.7 percent of the total acreage in unincorporated county hasrelatively low rates of homeowner overpayment, below 40.0 percent, 61.4percent of the RHNA capacity is anticipated in areas of low to moderate homeowner overpayment, including 65.7 percent of lower-income, 27.4percent of moderate-income, and 76.9 percent of above moderate-income units, the remainder of RHNA capacity is anticipated to occur on sites with moderately high homeowner overpayment between 40.0 and 59.9 percent. Although comprising 18.8 percent of total unincorporated county acreage, 34.3 percent of lower-income and 72.6 percent of moderate-income units are anticipated in higher homeowner overpayment communities of North Richmond, El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, Bay Point, West Pittsburg, and along I-680. An increase in the supply of lower- and moderate-income units in those areas impacted by overpayment will help to alleviate conditions that contribute to overpayment by reducing the gap between supply and demand for these housing types and further promoting housing mobility opportunities. Additionally, integration of above moderate-income units in these communities with higher homeowner overpayment may facilitate reduction of the concentration of cost burdened homeowners in these communities.40.6%28.6%81.8%48.6%90.9%16.0%46.9%2.8%18.5%6.5%43.4%24.5%15.3%32.9%1.6%1.0%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 5.0% of households5.0% to 9.9% of households10.0% to 14.9% of households15.0% to 19.9% of householdsшϮϬ͘ϬйŽĨŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-107FIGURE 6-26 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PERCENTAGE OF HOMEOWNERS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSINGSource: ACS 2015-2019; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022In contrast, although 28.9 percent of the unincorporated county acreage has low to moderate renter overpayment rates (less than 40.0 percent), 37.9percent of the RHNA capacity is anticipated in these areas including 45.5percent of lower-income, 18.4 percent of moderate-income, and 35.1percent of above moderate-income units. The remainder of the RHNA capacity is anticipated to occur on sites with moderately high renter overpayment between 40.0 and 59.9 percent (46.0 percent of total RHNA capacity) and high renter overpayment above 60.0 percent (16.1 percent of total RHNA capacity).Communities experiencing 40.0 to 59.9 percent renter overpayment rates, comprising 59.3 percent of unincorporated county acreage, including portions of El Sobrante, Discovery Bay and Rodeo, East Richmond Heights,Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, Vine Hill, and Pacheco are anticipated to accommodate the largest proportion of moderate- and above moderate-income unit capacity, 61.6 percent and 63.6 percent respectively, as well as 33.2 percent of lower-income unit capacity. Comprising 11.8 percent of total unincorporated county acreage, 21.3 percent of lower-income and 19.9percent of moderate-income units are anticipated in the higher renter overpayment communities of North Richmond and Bay Point, many of which are anticipated on the properties owned by the Contra Costa Housing Authority, in contrast to 1.3 percent of the above moderate-income unitcapacity identified on sites within the high renter overpayment communities. However, the benefit of locating lower-income housing in these areas is that it will help reduce displacement risk for households experiencing overpayment by providing affordable housing where there is the greatest demand for these options. Typically, above moderate-income rental units are unaffordable to cost-burdened renter households, while lower- and moderate-income housing units can help alleviate overpayment. Therefore, sites for new units have been identified across a range of overpayment rates for both owners and renters with the intent of increasing the supply of affordable housing for all income categories, thus reducing the risk of displacement due to overpayment for all Contra Costa County residents.0.1%65.7%27.4%76.9%61.4%80.7%34.3%72.6%23.1%38.6%18.8%0.4%0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres< 20.0% of homeowners20.0% to 39.9% of homeowners40.0% to 59.9% of homeowners60.0% to 80.0% of homeowners
6-108 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementFIGURE 6-27 PERCENTAGE OF UNIT CAPACITY AND COUNTY ACREAGE BY PERCENTAGE OF RENTERS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSINGSource: ACS 2015-2019; Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 20225. Contributing FactorsThrough discussions with stakeholders, fair housing advocates, and this assessment of fair housing issues, the County identified factors that contribute to fair housing issues in Contra Costa County, as shown in Table 6-38. While there are several strategies identified to address the fair housing issues, the most pressing issues are the disproportionate housing need and access to opportunities between the communities in unincorporated western and northern Contra Costa County and central, southern, and eastern portions of the county. In the western and northern areas, there are concentrations of poverty, fewer homeownership opportunies, greater overcrowding, and more limited access to employment and education. As such, identifying mechanisms to promote housing mobility to central, eastern, and southern Contra Costa County as well as facilitating place-based revitalization in western and northern areas are key to affirmatively furthering fair housing in Contra Costa County. Prioritized contributing factors are bboldedin Table 6-38 and associated actions to meaningfully affirmatively further fair housing related to these factors are boldd andd italicized. 1.4%1.7%0.7%3.6%45.5%17.0%33.4%37.2%25.3%33.2%61.6%63.6%46.0%59.3%21.3%19.9%1.3%16.1%11.8%0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lower- Income CapacityModerate-Income CapacityAbove Moderate-Income CapacityTotal RHNA CapacityCounty AcreagePercent of Units/Acres<20.0% of renters20.0% to 39.9% of renters40.0% to 59.9% of rentersшϲϬ͘ϬйŽĨƌĞŶƚĞƌƐ
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6-109TABLE 6-38 FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO FAIR HOUSING ISSUESAFH Identified IssuesContributing FactorsMeaningful ProgramsConcentration of affluence in the central and eastern portions of the County, resulting in potential areas of exclusion (possible RCAAs)LLower--densityy developmentt leadingg too typicallyy higherr homee values Lack of Public Housing and shortage of affordable housing options in generalHE-A2.1 Provide funding for affordable housing development.HE-A3.4 Prioritize funding for affordable housing providers for acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing.HE-A2.55 Promotee ADUU constructionn inn highh resourcee areas/areass off concentratedd affluence.. HE-A5.11 Increasee thee supplyy off landd zonedd forr high-densityy housing.. HE-A5.5 Faciliate lot consolidation for multi-family development.HE-A6.11 Encouragee updatess too zoningg too supportt veryy highh densityy development.. Concentration of lower-income households in the western and northern portions of the County (i.e. North Richmond, Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, Bayview, Rodeo, Bay Point)Higher--densityy housing Historyy off industriall usess influencingg ddevelopmentt patternss andd conditions Higher rates of families with children in central and eastern areasLower labor force participation in western communitiesHE-A2.4 Prioritize funding for affordable housing providers for acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing.HE-A5.5 Encourage infill development through lot consolidation for both single-family and multi-family development.HE-A7.11 Promotee servicess andd programss too assistt personss securee employment.. HE-A7.1 Review the Zoning Ordinance to ensure there are no constraints on locating childcare near employment centers. Displacement risk due to housing costs, particularly in western and northern communitiesConcentrations of lower-income householdsRapidlyy increasingg housingg ccostss pairedd withh aa shortagee off affordablee units Rise in housing costs outpacing wage increasesNeww developmentt hass largelyy beenn abovee mmoderate-incomee single-familyy homes,, orr ssimilar. HE--A22.33 Increasee thee supplyy off affordablee housingg throughh implementation off thee Inclusionaryy Housingg OOrdinance. HE-A2.44 Prioritizee fundingg forr affordablee housingg providerss forr acquisitionn andd rehabilitationn off rentall housingg too preservee units,, includingg inn highh resourcee areas.. HE-A2.5 Promote ADU construction in high resource areas.HE-A4.1 Promote the availability of programs that faciliate homeownership opportunities, including assistance for first-time homebuyers.HE-A5.6 Encourage infill development through lot consolidtation for both single-family and multi-familydevelopment.HE-A7.22 Prioritizee projectss thatt willl nott involvee permanentt relocationn off residents,, offerr firstt rightt too returnn iff ttemporaryy relocationn iss unavoidable.
6-110 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing ElementAFH Identified IssuesContributing FactorsMeaningful ProgramsDisplacement risk due to overcrowding in North Richmond and Bay PointRapid drop in vacancy rates since 2010 leaving fewer housing options.RRapidlyy increasingg housingg costss pairedd withh aa shortagee off affordablee units HE--A22.22 Pursuee affordablee housingg developmentt onn County--ownedd landd inn Northh Richmond,, Bayy Point,, andd RRodeo. HE-A2.33 Providee incentivess forr developerss subjectt too IHOO whoo providee affordablee unitss withh threee orr moree bbedroomss inn areass off concentrratedd overcrowding.HE-A2.4 Prioritize funding for affordable housing providers for acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing.HE-A7.2 Prioritize projects that will not involve permanent relocation of residents, offer first right to return if temporary relocation is unavoidable.Disproportionate access to high performing schoolsLowerr schooll performancee schoolss inn nneighborhoodss withh lowerr mediann incomee and/orr concentrationss off Hispanicc andd non--Hispanicc Blackk residents. Higher rates of absenteeism in schools in disadvantaged communities.HE-A2.55 Promotee ADUU constructionn inn highh resourcee areass too createe housingg mobilityy opportunites.. HE-A7.11 Workk withh schooll districtss too developp strategiess too improvee accesss too highh performingg schools.. HE-A7.1 Work with the Housing Authority to encourage landlords throughout the County, particularly in high resource areas, to advertise their units for voucher holders.Disadvantaged community designations for 8 communities in western and northern areasExposuree too pollutantss resultingg fromm iindustriall uses,, vehiclee traffic,, andd waterr contamination Historicc patternss off discriminationn andd pollutionn fromm industriall uses High-density residential areas with slightly more affordable options than other areas in the countyHE-A2.33 Increasee thee supplyy off affordablee housingg throughoutt thee Countyy throughh implementationn off thee IInclusionaryy Housingg Ordinance. HE-A2.44 Prioritizee fundingg forr affordablee housingg providerss forr acquisitionn andd rehabilitationn off rentall housingg too preservee units,, faciliatee place-basedd revitalizationn andd increasee mobilityy options.. HE-A2.5 Promote ADU construction in high resource areas to create housing mobility opportunites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -111
6.3 Housing Constraints
The provision of adequate and affordable housing opportunities is an
important goal of the County. However, a variety of factors can constrain the
development, maintenance, and improvement of housing. These include
development costs, government constraints, lack of infrastructure, and
environmental issues. This section addresses these potential constraints that
affect the supply of housing in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa
County.
In evaluating the residential growth potential based on the development of
vacant and underutilized sites in the unincorporated areas, the County has
undertaken a parcel-by-parcel review of the available sites within the Urban
Limit Line (ULL). Realistic development potential is assessed, considering the
market trends, development standards, environmental constraints, and
infrastructure and public facility/service constraints discussed in this section.
The residential development potential is presented in Section 4 of this
Housing Element.
A. MARKET CONSTRAINTS
Land costs, construction costs, and market financing contribute to the cost
of housing development, and can potentially hinder the production of new
housing. Although many constraints are driven by market conditions,
jurisdictions have some leverage in instituting policies and programs to
address such constraints. The section analyzes these market constraints as
well as the activities that the County undertakes to mitigate their effects.
1. Development Costs
Construction costs vary widely according to the type of development, with
multi-family housing generally less expensive per unit to construct than
single-family homes. However, wide variation within each construction type
exists depending on the size of the unit and the number and quality of
amenities provided.
In addition to construction, the price of land is also one of the largest
components of housing development costs. Land costs may vary depending
on where the site is in the county (Central County is significantly more
expensive than portions of East and West County), and whether the site is
vacant or has an existing use that must be removed. Similarly, site
constraints, such as environmental issues (i.e., steep slopes, soil stability,
seismic hazards, or flooding) can also be a major factor in the cost of land. A
survey of sales price listings of vacant lots in unincorporated communities
across the county in November 2021 finds that most lots for sale tend to be
smaller. Although the largest vacant lot for sale was more than 37 acres in
size, the median vacant lot was 0.64 acres. The survey also shows that vacant
lots can vary in affordability from $50,000 to $2,499,888, though the median
vacant lot in the county costs $395,000, which is lower than most home sales
prices as determined by the home sales price listing survey in the Housing
Needs Assessment section. However, due to the small size of most vacant
lots surveyed, acreage tends to be expensive, with the median dollar per
acre amount equaling $1,080,992.65. The most expensive vacant lots were in
the Central sub-region of the county, with all but one sales price listings for
vacant lots with a price of at least $1 million. Sales price listings for vacant
lots in the Western and Eastern sub-regions ranged from $50,000 to $1.9
million and $135,000 to $650,000, respectively.
6 -112 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Based on pro forma work detailing construction costs of two recent multi-
family developments, the average cost to construct an apartment unit in the
unincorporated areas is approximately $526,797 (including the cost of land
and impact fees). The more costly development was Galindo in the Central
sub-region, which cost $1,008,601 per unit, while some portions of the
Legacy development in the West sub-region cost less, at $571,788 per unit.
Single-family home construction costs can be less than multi-family
development. However, land costs and other charges can off-set those costs
and result in higher costs overall. The estimated average development cost
of a two-story single-family home consisting of 2,000 square feet in Contra
Costa County would cost an approximate $427,205 total, or approximately
$213.60 per square foot. The cost will vary significantly depending on the
quality of materials used, the size of the unit and lot, the location, and the
number and quality of amenities provided.
A reduction in amenities and the quality of building materials (above a
minimum acceptability for health, safety, and adequate performance) could
result in lower prices. In addition, prefabricated factory-built housing may
provide lower-priced housing by reducing construction and labor costs.
Another factor related to construction costs is the number of units built
simultaneously. As the number increases, costs generally decrease as
builders benefit from economies of scale.
Another key component is the price of raw land and any necessary
improvements. The high demand for residential development keeps land
cost relatively high throughout the Bay Area. In the unincorporated areas,
residential land costs vary depending on the site and the area. In addition,
in-fill development, which is the current regional priority, is more expensive
than “green field” development. Many in-fill parcels have existing structures
and/or contaminated conditions. Aging infrastructure may require
replacement. These factors increase the cost of development. The County
owns former redevelopment agency residential parcels in the
unincorporated communities of Bay Point, Rodeo, and North Richmond. All
sites will be developed with affordable housing.
2. Home Financing
The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a
home. Currently, lending standards are recovering from the COVID-19
pandemic and associated economic slowdown, which caused the average
mortgage rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage to fall to 2.68 percent by
December 2020 from the previous rate of 3.7 percent reported in January
2020. Rates are now trending upwards but are still below where they were in
recent years. Table 6-38 reports the varying mortgage and refinance rates
for homebuyers as of November 2021.
TABLE 6-38 INTEREST RATES – NOVEMBER 2021
Product Interest Rate APR
Conforming and FHA Loans
30-Year Fixed Rate 5.375% 5.557%
30-Year Fixed-Rate VA 4.750% 5.078%
15-Year Fixed Rate 4.750% 5.017%
Jumbo Loans
30-Year Fixed-Rate Jumbo 4.750% 4.855%
15-Year Fixed-Rate Jumbo 4.500% 4.701%
Source: Wells Fargo – Current Mortgage and Refinance Rates (accessed: August 26, 2022):
https://www.wellsfargo.com/mortgage/rates/?linkLoc=fn
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -113
Specific housing programs such as first-time homebuyer programs or other
mortgage assistance programs can be a useful tool providing help with down
payment and closing costs, which are often significant obstacles to home
ownership for lower-income and minority groups.
B. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Local policies and regulations can impact the price and availability of housing
and, in particular, the provision of affordable housing. Land use controls, site
improvement requirements, fees and exactions, permit processing
procedures, and other factors may constrain the maintenance, development,
and improvement of housing. This section discusses potential governmental
constraints as well as policies that encourage housing development in the
unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County.
1. Land Use Controls
The Land Use Element of the Contra Costa County General Plan sets forth
the policies for guiding development. These policies, together with existing
zoning regulations, establish the amount and distribution of land allocated
for different uses within the unincorporated areas of the county. As
described in Table 6-39, the General Plan has four residential designations
for single-family dwellings and seven for multi-family uses, permitting
varying l density for rural and urban residential uses. The County is currently
undertaking “Envision Contra Costa 2040,” an effort to update the entire
General Plan, including the Land Use Element and its Land Use Map. The
General Plan update will effectively establish the land use and housing
development patterns across the County’s unincorporated areas for the next
two decades. The State of California requires that the County update its
Housing Element every eight years on established cycles so the Housing
Element, once adopted, will only be effective until 2031. This Housing
Element reports the land use controls in effect in the current Contra Costa
County General Plan (adopted 2005).
Residential Development Standards
The County regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential
development primarily through the Zoning Code. Zoning regulations are
designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of
residents as well as implement the policies of the County’s General Plan. The
Zoning Code also serves to preserve the character and integrity of existing
neighborhoods. The County maintains the current Zoning Code with zoning
and development standards along with current fees on the County website.
6 -114 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
TABLE 6-39 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Single-
Family
Residential
Multiple-
Family
Residential
Very Low
(SV) Low (SL) Very Low
(SV) Low (SL) Very Low
(SV) Low (SL) Very Low
(SV) Low (SL) Very Low
(SV) Low (SL) Very Low
(SV) Low (SL)
Consistent
Zoning
District(s)
R-40, R-65,
R-100 R-15, R-20, R-10, R-12, R-6, R-7, D-
1 Undefined R-6, D-1, T-
1, M-6, M-9
T-1, M-9,
M-12, M-17 M-17, M-29 M-29 P-1 P-1 T-1
Possible Zoning
District(s)
P-1, A
Districts
P-1, A
Districts
P-1, A
Districts
P-1, A
Districts N/A P-1 P-1 P-1 P-1 P-1
Density 0.2 – 0.9 1.0 – 2.9 3.0 – 4.9 5.0 – 7.2 0.2 7.3 – 11.9 12.0 – 21.9 22.0 – 29.9 30.0 – 44.9 45.0 – 99.9 N/A 1.0 – 12.0
Residential
Type(s)
Detached
single-
family
homes
consistent
with rural
lifestyle
Detached
single-
family
homes on
large lots
Detached
single-
family
homes on
moderate-
sized lots
Detached
single-
family
homes and
duplexes on
smaller lots
Detached
single-
family
homes with
densities as
defined in
the SV, SL,
or SM
designation
s per
density
bonus
program
allowances.
Single- or
two-story
duplexes,
condos,
town
houses,
mobile
home
parks,
Denser and
larger-size
residential
uses as in
the ML
designation.
Multi-story
residential
uses as
defined in
the ML
designation.
Multi-story
apt. and
condo
complexes
with
smaller
units
Multi-story
apartment
and condo
complexes
with
smaller
units with
very high
density
Senior
housing
with shared
facilities
Mobile
homes
Notes:
1. Residential land uses may sometimes occur at densities lower than the allowed.
2. The zoning districts listed in this column could be found consistent with the General Plan designation under certain circumstances depending upon the specific use that is proposed.
3. Density increases available through participation in bonus programs described in the Contra Costa General Plan Land Use Element pg. 3-22 (2005).
Source: Contra Costa County General Plan, Land Use Element, 2005-2020.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -115
Table 6-40 summarizes the most pertinent residential standards for single-
family, while Table 6-41 summarizes residential multi-family housing
standards, including those for mobile homes and mobile home parks. In
each table, zone districts are grouped by the General Plan land use category
in which they are permitted (i.e., Very Low, Low, Medium, and High). Note
that there are not minimum open space standards in residential zones so
that standard has not been included in the table.
TABLE 6-40 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development
Standard
General Plan Land Use Category and Zone District
Very Low Low Medium High
R-100 R-65 R-40 1 R-20 R-15 1 R-12 R-10 1 R-7 R-6 P-1
Max. Density (du/ac) 0.4 0.67 1.1 2.2 2.9 3.6 4.4 6.2 7.2 Varies based on
proposed project
Min. Lot Area (sq. ft.) 100,000 65,000 40,000 20,000 15,000 12,000 10,000 7,000 6,000 Varies based on
proposed project
Min. Lot Size (ft.) 200 x 200 140 x 140 140 x 140 120 x 120 100 x 100 100 x 100 80 x 90 70 x 90 60 x 90 Varies based on
proposed project
Front Yard (ft.) 30 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 20 Varies based on
proposed project
Side Yard (ft.) 30 20 20 15 10 10 10 5 5 Varies based on
proposed project
Aggregate Side Yard 60 40 40 35 25 25 20 15 15 Varies based on
proposed project
Rear Yard (ft.) 30 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Varies based on
proposed project
Max. Bldg. Ht.
(stories)
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
2.5
35 ft.
Varies based on
proposed project
Parking Req.
(space/unit) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Varies based on
proposed project
Notes:
1. The Land Use Element indicates that this zoning district is consistent with two General Plan land use designations.
Source: Contra Costa County Zoning Code, November 2021.
6 -116 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Single-Family Residential Development Standards
Given the diversity of residential areas in the county, the minimum lot size
for single-family homes ranges from 6,000 to 100,000 square feet,
translating to densities of seven dwelling units per acre (du/ac) down to less
than one du/ac. The maximum height limit for single-family homes is two and
a half stories (or 35 feet in height), while setbacks vary by lot size.
The D-1 zone permits two-family or duplex units such as townhomes to be
located on an 8,000-square-foot parcel, while the R-6 zone permits more
than one detached dwelling on a parcel so long as the lot size does not
exceed 6,000 square feet per dwelling unit.
Multi-family Residential Development Standards
Multi-family units are permitted in all M zones, providing densities ranging
from 6 to 29 du/ac. Mobile homes and mobile home parks are permitted in
T-1 zones. In addition, the lower-density multi-family zones permit the
development of single-family units. This often results in the development of
detached single-family homes on small lots (3,000 – 4,000 sq. ft.). The D-1
zone promotes the development of various housing types including single-
family or duplexes. The P-1 or Planned Unit District provides flexible
development standards to promote a variety of housing types from single-
family to very high-density residential development and mixed use
development, while the General Plan Mixed-Use category enables the
County to provide residential units in conjunction with commercial uses.
Both of these are described in more detail later in this section.
TABLE 6-41 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
Development
Standard
General Plan Land Use Category & Zone District
Low/Medium High Very
High
Very
High -
Special
T-11 M-6 M-9 M-12 D-1 M-17 M-29 P-1
Max. Density
(du/ac) 12 6 9 12 N/A 17 29 V2
Min. Lot Area
(sq. ft.) 2,5004 7,200 4,800 3,000 8,000 2,500 6,000 to
10,0005 217,8006
Min. Lot Size
(ft.) 40 x 90 varies varies varies 80 x 90 varies None V
Front Yard (ft.) 20 25 25 25 20 25 25 V
Side Yard (ft.) 5 20 20 20 10 20 20 V
Rear Yard (ft.) 15 20 20 20 15 20 20 V
Lot Coverage
(%) N/A 25 25 25 N/A 25 35 V
Max. Bldg.
Height
(stories or feet)
20 30 30 30 2.5
35 ft. 30 30 V
Parking Req.
(space/unit) 2 c c c 2 c c V
Notes:
1 T-1 Zone District for mobile homes and mobile home parks.
2 V = Variable, dependent on Planning Commission approval.
3 Dependent upon type of unit, refer to Table 6-42, Parking Requirements.
4 2,500 sq. ft. for mobile home park lots (mobile park requires 3-acre minimum area).
5 Residential uses in P-1 district shall be a minimum of 5 acres (217,800 square feet) except for mobile
home subdivisions, which shall be a minimum of 10 acres (435,600 square feet). Mixed uses consisting
of residential and non-residential uses shall have a minimum of 15 acres (653,400 square feet).
6 Minimum lot size for Zoning District M-29 depends on the building or structure proposed for the parcel.
Source: Contra Costa County Zoning Code, November 2021.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -117
The Zoning Code uses maximum height, lot area, and lot coverage
regulations to ensure the quality of multi-family development. The maximum
height limit in most multi-family zones is 35 (2.5 stories) feet; however, in the
P-1 zone, the permitted height may be higher subject to Planning
Commission approval. Lot coverage is typically limited to 25 percent, though
this increases to 35 percent in the M-29 zone. The development standards in
the T-1 zone are similar to those of the single-family zones; however, the lot
size and lot area are smaller.
The type of built density varies from site to site. The County has been
supportive in allowing the maximum number of units as long as there are no
physical constraints to the site (i.e., topographic, hydrologic, etc.). Often,
residential projects have sought flexibility in design and requested rezoning
to Planned Unit Development (P-1), which has facilitated the development of
projects because P-1 is consistent with all of the land use designations. On a
few occasions, a parcel may have two different land use designations and
the total density has to match the portion of the lot that it represents. For
example, one piece of the parcel may have a land use designation of Single-
family High Density, and other Multi-family High Density. The density has to
consider the amount of square footage covering each land use. Otherwise,
the County has been supportive in allowing the maximum number of units
within the allowed density range. The County has not approved any
residential projects on sites in the existing Housing Element sites inventory
at densities below those identified in the inventory.
Parking Standards
The County’s parking requirements for residential districts vary by housing
type, the number of units, and parking needs. Table 6-42 outlines the
County’s parking requirements for different housing types. Single-family units
are required to have two spaces per dwelling, which may be open or
covered. Similar to single-family units, the requirement for mobile homes,
duplexes, or town homes is two spaces per unit.
TABLE 6-42 PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Residential Type Required Spaces
Single-family 2 covered or open spaces
Duplex or Town House 2 covered or open spaces
Multi-family Unit (Apt. or Condo)1
Studio 1 space + ¼ space for guests2
One-bedroom 1 ½ spaces + ¼ space for guests2
Two or more bedrooms 2 spaces + ¼ space for guests2
Mobile Home 2 covered or open spaces3
Accessory Dwelling Unit 1 off-street space (may be in the setback)4
Emergency Shelter 1 space for every 10 beds, plus 2 spaces for staff5
Notes:
1 Half of the multi-family spaces shall be covered. Ten percent of the multi-family spaces shall be electric
vehicle charging spaces (EV spaces).
2 Curb parking along the property’s street frontage may be used to satisfy the guest parking
requirements.
3 Only applicable to mobile home subdivisions.
4 Parking space is not required if the ADU is established under County Code Section 82-24.006(b), or is
exempt from the parking requirement pursuant to County Code Section 82-24.012(i).
5 May be on an adjacent lot.
Source: Contra Costa County Zoning Code, November 2021.
The number of parking spaces required for multi-family apartment units and
condominiums ranges from one space for a studio to two spaces for units
with two or more bedrooms. An additional one-quarter parking space must
be provided per unit to accommodate guests. Action A3.5 is proposed to
update zoning requirements related to accessory dwelling units for
consistency with current state law. In the case of accessory dwelling units, a
parking space is not required if the ADU is established under County Code
Section 82-24.006(b), or is exempt from the parking requirement pursuant
6 -118 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
to County Code Section 82-24.012(i). One of the exemptions is proximity to
public transit (within one-half mile) which encourages transit use. The
driveway may also be used for parking for an ADU. . Since the County does
not require enclosed parking for multi-family developments, cost reductions
can be achieved by providing open spaces to fulfill the parking requirements.
Furthermore, multi-family developments can use curbside parking along the
property’s street frontage to fulfill part of the parking requirements for guest
parking. Ten percent of the multi-family spaces must be electric vehicle
charging spaces (EV spaces).
To facilitate the development of housing projects at locations that encourage
public transit use, the County has set forth a maximum amount of parking
permitted rather than a minimum. This has been done at the mixed-use
development at the Contra Costa Centre and is also proposed at a transit-
oriented development in Bay Point.
Flexibility in Development Standards
The County offers mechanisms that facilitate the provision of a diversity of
housing types. These mechanisms provide greater flexibility regarding
residential development standards than in conventional residential zone
districts. Such mechanisms include the Planned Unit District (P-1) and
density bonuses, described in more detail below.
Planned Unit District: The Planned Unit District (P-1) provides the
opportunity for a more imaginative and flexible design for large-scale
residential developments than would be permitted in conventional
residential districts. The use of the P-1 district is intended to promote the
diversification of buildings, lot sizes, and open spaces to produce an
environment in harmony with surrounding existing and potential uses. The
flexibility associated with the P-1 district includes variation in structures, lot
sizes, yards, and setbacks, and enables the developer to address specific
needs or environmental constraints in an area. The final plan for a planned
development is subject to approval by the County Planning Commission. The
P-1 designation is applicable to all residential districts.
Using the P-1 designation, increased residential densities can be achieved.
Density of up to 44.9 du/ac can be achieved in the P-1 district if the
underlying General Plan designation is Very High-Density Residential. The
density can be increased up to 99 du/ac if the underlying General Plan
designation is Very High-Density – Special Residential.
Currently, a few unincorporated communities in the county are entirely
zoned P-1 as a means of facilitating residential and other types of
development in these areas. The general direction of the County is to
encourage P-1 zoning in unincorporated areas, where it is appropriate in
relation to the community’s setting.
Mixed-Use Developments: The County General Plan Land Use Element
includes a category for mixed-use developments in the unincorporated
areas. This category has enabled the County to create unique projects that
combine residential uses, such as apartments or condominiums, with
commercial and other uses. Such developments provide needed housing
near key services such as transportation. The development at the Contra
Costa Centre is a prime example of this. Other mixed-use land use
designations in county unincorporated areas include the Bay Point Willow
Pass Corridor and the Parker Avenue downtown area in Rodeo. The mixed-
use category offers the County greater flexibility by providing needed
housing in urban areas close to important services, where larger residential
units are not appropriate. Table 6-43 lists the County’s designated mixed-
used areas and includes each area’s maximum allowable densities and
residential uses envisioned for those areas.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -119
TABLE 6-43 GENERAL DENSITY RESTRICTIONS AND ALLOWED RESIDENTIAL USES IN MIXED-USE AREAS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Mixed-Use Area Maximum Allowable Density Residential Uses
Parker Avenue Mixed Use (M-1) 29 units per acre Multi-family residential
Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed
Use (M-2) 16 to 30 units per acre Boarding homes, duplexes, home occupations, live-work studios, multi-family, and
detached single-family residential uses.
Pleasant Hill BART Station/
Contra Costa Centre Mixed-Use (M-3) 60 units per acre Multi-family residential
Willow Pass Road Mixed Use (M-4) 21 to 29 units per acre Boarding homes, single-family, duplexes, home occupations, multi-family, and
second residences.
Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed
Use (M-5) 21 to 29 units per acre Multi-family residential
Bay Point Residential Mixed Use (M-6)
Development Zone 2: 40-unit per net acre minimum
with 65 units per acre encouraged
Development Zone 3: 21 to 29.9 units per acre
Multi-family residential
Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed
Use (M-8) Within the Village Center -40 units per net acre High-density residential
Montalvin Manor Mixed Use (M-9) Site 1: 12 to 20.9 units per acre.
Site 2: 7.3 to 11.9 units per acre
Single-family, duplexes, multi-family, second residences, family member mobile
homes, mobile home parks, mobile home subdivisions, permanent mobile homes,
and RV parks or campgrounds
Appian Way General Mixed Use (M-11) 8 units per net acre
Duplexes, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, attached or detached single-
family residences (in compliance with P-1 design criteria), senior or congregate
care housing, and live-work quarters. Creative mixing of types of residential
development will be encouraged.
Triangle Area Mixed Use (M-12) 8 units per net acre Duplexes, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, attached or detached single-
family residences (in compliance with P-1 design criteria), and live work quarters.
San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use (M-13) 12 units per net acre
Duplexes, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, attached single-family
residences (in compliance P-1 design criteria), senior or congregate care housing,
and live work quarters.
Heritage Point Mixed Use (M-14) Approximately 52 units per net acre Affordable, multi-family residential units.
Saranap Village Mixed Use (M-15) Approximately 53.5 units per net acre High-density residential uses (apartments and condominiums).
Source: Contra Costa County General Plan Land Use Element 2005; Contra Costa County Zoning Code and Area Wide Planned Unit Development Plans (accessed December 29, 2021): https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/4736/Zoning-
Code-and-Area-Wide-Planned-Unit-D; Contra Costa County staff communication (December 9, 2021).
6 -120 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Density Bonus: In accordance with state law and the County’s Residential
Density Bonus Ordinance, Contra Costa County provides density bonuses to
qualified new housing projects. Specifically, the developer must have: (1) at
least 10 percent of the total units affordable to lower-income households; (2)
at least 5 percent of the total units affordable to very-low-income
households; (3) 10 percent of a for-sale housing development as moderate-
income housing; (4) an age-restricted senior citizen housing development (5)
10 percent of a housing development for transitional foster youth, disabled
veterans, or homeless persons with an affordability restriction of 55 years as
very low income units; (6) 20 percent of total units for lower income students
in a student housing development; or (7) 100 percent of units in the
development, including density bonus units, for lower income households.
Affordability must be maintained for at least 55 years for a rental project and
45 years for owner-occupied housing units. If these conditions are met, the
developer is entitled to a density bonus of between 5 and 80 percent of the
maximum density permitted in the underlying zone plus one to three
incentives (e.g., modified standards, regulatory incentives, or concessions) of
equal financial value based on land costs per dwelling unit. The County has
used density bonuses to facilitate the development of affordable housing.
The County is proposing Action HE-A4.5 to update their zoning in Section
822-2 for consistency with the current state density bonus law.
Inclusionary Housing: In November 2019 and February 2022, the Contra
Costa County Board of Supervisors updated the Inclusionary Housing
Regulations in Chapter 822-4 of the County Ordinance Code. This section of
the Ordinance Code establishes the currently adopted inclusionary housing
program for the county’s unincorporated communities. A summary of
Chapter 822-4’s provisions is below:
Inclusionary unit requirement. Table 6-44 outlines the minimum number of
inclusionary units that the County’s Ordinance Code requires at each income
level per quantity of housing units developed by each project.
TABLE 6-44 MINIMUM NUMBER OF INCLUSIONARY UNITS BY
HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY TYPE AND NUMBER OF
HOUSING UNITS DEVELOPED
Number
and Type
of Units
Proposed
Inclusionary Units Total
Inclusionary
Units of all
Units
Very Low
Income
(VLI)
Lower Income
(LI)
Moderate
Income
5 to 125
rental units 20+%
Remainder of
inclusionary units
after VLI threshold
N/A 15%
5 to 125
for-sale
units
N/A 20+%
Remainder of
inclusionary units
after LI threshold
15%
126 or
more rental
units
20+% N/A
Remainder of
inclusionary units
after VLI threshold
15%
126 or
more for-
sale units
N/A 20+%
Remainder of
inclusionary units
after LI threshold
15%
Source: Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, Article 822-4.4
In-lieu Fee. Developers may pay an in-lieu fee as an alternative to building
some of the inclusionary housing units as required by Table 6-44. The fee
schedule establishes the valuation of the in-lieu fee. In general, the fee paid
in lieu of developing for-sale inclusionary units equals the difference
between the (1) affordable sales price and the (2) median sales price for all
single-family homes sold in the county within the prior 12 months. The in-lieu
fee equals the difference between (1) the average rent of a two-bedroom
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -121
unit with a 1.5 bathroom and (2) annual affordable rent for the target
household, calculated annually for 55 years. The County requires payment of
in-lieu fees before issuing any permits to the developer. As of June 2022,
the County had collected a total of $946,000 paid by developers as in-lieu
fees since 2015.
Alternative compliance. Developers may comply with the inclusionary housing
ordinance in ways other than building the inclusionary housing on-site or
paying an in-lieu fee. They may build off-site inclusionary housing units,
convey land titles to the County, combine these two options, or use a
crediting system with another housing developer to apply excess
inclusionary housing units built at one development to help another
developer meet their inclusionary housing requirements.
Exemptions. The following housing types are exempt from the inclusionary
regulations: developments of one to four housing units; housing destroyed
by natural disaster (i.e., fire, flood, earthquake, etc.) that is re-built within six
months of the destruction date to the exact size and land use as the
previous structure; residential developments that receive/complete
discretionary approval and/or building permits or an unexpired vesting
tentative map and/or a completed and submitted application for a tentative
map before the ordinance took effect; a community care facility as defined in
Health and Saftey Code Section 1502; or a housing development proposed
in an area of the unincorporated county that the County has deemed a
redevelopment area, prior to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies
statewide in 2012.
Restrictions. For rental inclusionary units, the monthly rent must remain in
place for the target income level group for a minimum of 55 years. For-sale
inclusionary unit qualifying households must not have owned their prior
home within three years prior to their application and may have no more
than $200,000 in assets. Occupants of for-sale inclusionary units must agree
to live in the unit for a minimum of three years unless an emergency occurs.
For-sale inclusionary units may be sold at a market rate to above-moderate
income households only (1) after its first sale to the target income group and
(2) if the sale allows the County to recapture the sum of both (a) the
difference between the initial affordable sales price and the appraised
market value of the unit at the time of the initial sale and (b) the
proporationate share by the County of any appreciation since the time of the
unit’s first sale.
Standards. All inclusionary housing units must include and have access to the
same amenities provided for market-rate units. They cannot be segregated
from the market-rate units and must be dispersed throughout the
development. Bedroom count should be the same as the average number of
bedrooms provided for market-rate units. The developer must place
occupants in the inclusionary units at the same rate/time as the market-rate
units.
Review. The inclusionary housing developer must submit a housing plan to
the County for their review. This plan must contain or address:
• Brief description of the residential development, which includes the
number of inclusionary housing units compared to the market rate and
how the developer determined these numbers;
• The mix, location, type, and number of bedrooms for the market and
inclusionary units;
• Intended income levels for the inclusionary units;
• Phasing plan (for phased developments) that will bring the inclusionary
units online with each phase of the overall project;
6 -122 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Description of any incentives requested from the County by the
developer;
• Statement and calculation of intended in-lieu payments for developers
who intend to pay in-lieu fees to meet their requirements; and
• Description and analysis for developers seeking alternative compliance
showing that on-site construction of inclusionary units is not possible
or that alternative compliance will provide greater benefits than the
conventional compliance.
The County has a maximum of 45 days from the submission of the
inclusionary housing plan to either approve or reject it. Inclusionary housing
plans are required for any applications seeking discretionary approval.
Inclusionary Housing Agreements. All developers not exempt from the County’s
inclusionary housing ordinance and who opt not to pay in-lieu fees must sign
and enter into an inclusionary housing agreement with the County. The
agreement must contain or address:
• The number of for-sale versus rental units;
• The number, size, location, and square footage of inclusionary units;
• The market value and sales or rental prices of the inclusionary units;
• Any incentives used;
• Provisions enforcing the “Restrictions” and “Standards” (Sections 410
and 412(d) of the inclusionary housing ordinance), such as deed
restrictions, that the County must approve;
• Provisions for determining income eligibility and to maintain ongoing
affordability in the future; and
• Provisions for the enforcement and implementation of alternative
compliance methods, as appropriate.
Incentives. Developers of inclusionary housing may apply for and receive a
density bonus for no more than 15 percent of the total units developed. If
the developer reserves any of the proposed units in excess of the minimum
amounts of lower-income or senior housing units required by the County,
then the developer may apply for a density bonus, as outlined by Cal. Govt.
Code Section 65915(d)(2). At its discretion, the County may also grant fee
deferral, waivers, tax-exempt financing, or modification of the land use
controls and development standards to help otherwise incentivize the
developer in building the inclusionary housing units.
In general, the requirements and standards of the County’s inclusionary
housing ordinance are similar to other jurisdictions, use existing state
incentives, and therefore do not act as a constraint to the development of
affordable housing. In Contra Costa County, the overriding constraint to
affordable housing development is the high land costs, availability of
financing, neighborhood opposition or NIMBYism, and other market factors.
To mitigate this constraint, the County has been proactively pursuing
affordable housing opportunities through the use of subsidies. As
demonstrated later in Section 6.6, Housing Plan, the County will continue to
work with both for-profit and non-profit developers to actively encourage
affordable housing development.
Short-Term Rentals: In 2020, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
adopted ordinance 2020-12 and incorporated it as Chapter 88-32 into the
County’s Ordinance Code to provide the regulations for short-term rental
housing in the unincorporated county. The County’s short-term rental
ordinance includes the following provisions:
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -123
Siting. Short-term rentals can exist in any single-family district, planned unit
district for residential uses, water recreational district, multiple-family
residential district, or agricultural district (except if the agricultural lot is
under the jurisdiction of the Williamson Act).
Term. The County permits short-term rental uses through (1) ministerial
short-term rental permits, which last for one year from the permit approval
date, and (2) discretionary short-term rental permits, which last until the date
specified by the County but not more than five years from the permit date.
Use. The County establishes use regulations for short-term rental units in
Division 88-32.602 of the Ordinance Code. The County forbids short-term
rentals from being located in buildings with five or more dwelling units, from
being in use more than 180 days per year, and from being used by more
than two persons per bedroom plus two additional persons elsewhere in the
unit. Each short-term rental unit with three bedrooms or less must have at
least one off-street parking space for guests, and each unit with four or more
bedrooms must have two or more off-street parking spaces for guests.
Accessory dwelling units are not allowed locations for hosting short-term
rentals.
The County’s regulations and standards for short-term rental uses do not
pose a significant constraint to new development. The short-term rental
regulations were updated recently and balance housing needs of long-term
residents while providing options for property owners to have a short-term
rental. The County will continue to monitor the impacts of short-term rentals
on long-term housing options.
2. Provisions for a Variety of Housing
Housing element law specifies that jurisdictions must identify adequate sites
to be made available through appropriate zoning and development
standards to encourage the development of various housing types for all
economic segments of the population. This includes single-family housing,
multi-family housing, factory-built housing, mobile homes, emergency
shelters, and transitional housing. Table 6-45 summarizes the housing types
permitted within the primary residential zones in the county’s
unincorporated areas.
In addition to the residential districts identified in the Land Use Element,
several other zone districts permit limited residential development. These
include the less-intensive agricultural districts (A-2), which permit one single-
family dwelling unit per lot. Residential development is also permitted in the
Interchange Transitional District and in most commercial/business and
industrial districts (N-B, CM, C-B, L-I, and H-I) subject to a land use permit. In
the Retail Business (RB) District and the General Commercial (GC) District,
single-family homes and duplexes are permitted by right; however, multi-
family developments require a land use permit.
The County offers a diversity of housing types that are available for all
economic segments of the community as well as more vulnerable members
of the community, including those earning lower income, seniors, disabled
households, farm workers, and persons experiencing homelessness, among
others. These include multi-family units, accessory dwelling units, mobile
homes, and other more affordable housing opportunities.
6 -124 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
TABLE 6-45 HOUSING TYPES PERMITTED BY ZONE DISTRICT
Housing Types Permitted Single-Family Zone Districts
R-100 R-65 R-40 R-20 R-15 R-12 R-10 R-7 R-6 D-1
Single-family detached P P P P P P P P P P
Duplex/Townhomes
Accessory/Junior Accessory Dwelling Units P P P P P P P P P P
Mobile/Manufactured homes P P P P P P P P P P
Special Needs Housing
Transitional housing (7 or more persons) c c c c c c c c c c
Supportive housing (7 or more persons) c c c c c c c c c c
Transitional housing (6 people or less) - - - - P P P P P P
Supportive housing (6 people or less) - - - - P P P P P P
Emergency shelter2 - - - - - - - - - -
Residential care (≤6 beds) P P P P P P P P P P
Residential care (>6 beds) c c c c c c c c c c
Single-Room Occupancy (SRO)4 - - - - - - - - - -
Employee/Farmworker Housing3 P P P P P P P P P P
Second Residence C C C C C C C C C C
Housing Types Permitted Multi-family Zone Districts1
M-29 M-17 M-12 M-9 M-6 P-15 T-1
Residential Uses
Single-family detached P P P P P P -
Multi-family (3 or more) P P P P P P -
Duplex/Townhomes P P P P P P -
Mobile/Mfg. homes - - - - - - P
Mobile home parks - - - - - - c
Accessory Dwelling Units P P P P P P -
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -125
Housing Types Permitted Multi-family Zone Districts1
M-29 M-17 M-12 M-9 M-6 P-1 T-1
Special-Needs Housing
Transitional housing (7 or more persons) c c c c c - -
Supportive housing (7 or more persons) c c c c c - -
Transitional housing (6 people or less) P P P P P P -
Supportive housing (6 people or less) P P P P P P -
Emergency shelter2 - - - - - - -
Residential care (≤6 beds) P P P P P C -
Residential care (>6 beds) c c c c c C -
Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) - - - - - P4 -
Employee/Farmworker Housing3 P P P P P P -
Notes:
1. Single-family attached and detached units are also permitted in the lower-density multi-family zones (M-6, M-9, and M-12)
2. Emergency shelters not allowed in any residential districts. Only permitted in General Commercial (C) zoning district.
3. Refers only to Farmworker Dwellings as defined by Ordinance No. 2017-14, not Farmworker Housing Complexes or Farmworker Housing Centers.
4. Permitted with Administrative Review only if the development complies with all the County’s standards for the underlying zones. Non-compliant developments subject to land use permit. Also permitted in R-B (Retail-
Business) zoning district.
5. The P-1 zone allows both multifamily and single-family development
Source: Contra Costa County Zoning Code, November 2021. P = Permitted c = subject to a Land Use Permit
Multi-family Units: The Zoning Code permits multi-family housing
opportunities (projects with 3 or more units) in the multi-family zones (M-29,
M-17, M-12, M-9, and M-6) by right. Note that other zones allow more than
one unit including duplexes and ADUs. Densities range from 6 units per acre
to 29 units per acre. Densities of up to 99 units per acre are permitted in the
Planned Unit District (P-1). Approximately 16 percent of the County housing
stock consists of multi-family residences. Contra Costa County offers a wide
variety of affordable multi-family units for lower-income households and
persons with special needs, such as seniors, people with disabilities, and
those with HIV/AIDS.
Licensed Care Facilities: The Zoning Code permits licensed residential or
community care facilities with six or fewer beds in all residential zones by
right. Those facilities with more than six beds require a land use permit.
Although proposals for residential care facilities with more than six residents
are not common in Contra Costa County, they have nonetheless occurred in
the past and the County has upheld its regulatory process of requiring
6 -126 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
administrative review before issuing a development permit. When these
proposals have emerged, the use has required compliance with conditions
of approval for the land use permit including verification that the residential
care facility was licensed by an appropriate state or local agency, and that
public services (police and fire protection) and utilities (water, sewer, etc.)
were adequate to serve the location and size of the facility. In each case,
there were certain conditions relating to the approval of a site plan for the
facility and maximum number of employees working in the facility at one
time.
Accessory Dwelling Units: Accessory dwelling units are designed to provide
an opportunity for the development of small rental units as one way of
providing affordable housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and
families as well as seniors and people with disabilities. Accessory dwelling
units are permitted ministerially with an approved ADU permit
(Administrative Permit) in all districts that allow single-family and multi-family
residential uses. The accessory dwelling unit must not exceed 1,200 square
feet (any size if it is an internal conversion) and must provide complete
independent living facilities for one or more persons. Accessory dwelling
units may be rented or leased, but they must conform to the standards that
are applicable to residential construction in the zone in which the unit is
located. Action HE-A5.4 is proposed to continue to update the County’s
accessory dwelling unit reguilations as changes to state law are made, to
publicize this housing option and to create pre-approved accessory dwelling
unit plans to assist homeowners who are interested in building an accessory
dwelling unit.
Mobile/Manufactured Homes: Mobile homes and manufactured housing
offer an affordable housing option to many low- and moderate-income
households and are permitted in all residential and agricultural zoning
districts. In addition, mobile homes are permitted in several commercial, and
industrial districts (i.e., H-I, L-I, C, F-R, F-1, C-M, and W-3) subject to a land use
permit. The Contra Costa County Planning and Zoning Code also permits
mobile home parks in the T-1 district. Mobile homes are permitted for
caretaker use in the H-I, L-I, A-80, A-40, A-20, A-4, A-3, A-2, A-1, C, F-R, F-1, C-
M and W-3 districts, subject to a land use permit. Currently, approximately
2,816 mobile homes are in mobile home parks in the County’s
unincorporated area .
Farmworker Housing: The county is home to a variety of agricultural uses,
many of which are located in the southern and eastern areas of the county.
According to the 2017 Agricultural Census, 1,310 workers were employed on
farms in Contra Costa County. Currently, the Zoning Code permits farm
worker housing in the agricultural districts (A-2, A-3, A-4, A-20, A-40, and A-
80) by right. The County amended the Zoning Code in 2017 to be consistent
with the State Employee Housing Act with respect to farm labor housing. This
action removed the requirement to secure a land use permit for farmworker
housing in agricultural zoning districts, though the County requires that all
persons operating farmworker housing apply for and receive a farmworker
housing permit for the three types of allowable farmworker housing (i.e., (1)
farmworker dwelling, (2) farmworker housing complex, or (3) farmworker
housing center) per County Ordinance Code 82-52.602. Action HE-A6.1 is
proposed to ensure the County updates their code to comply with the
portion of the Employee Housing Act that requires the County to allow
employee housing for six persons or fewer anywhere single-family residential
uses are allowed (Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5).
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -127
As stated in the Land Use Element, approximately 26,720 acres within the
ULL are zoned for agricultural use and an additional 312,000 acres outside
the ULL are designated for agriculture, open space, wetlands, parks, and
other non-urban uses. The majority of agricultural land is in the eastern
portion of the county and has a General Plan designation of Agricultural
Lands (AL) or Agricultural Core (AC).
Emergency Shelters, Transitional, and Permanent Supportive Housing:
Supportive housing and transitional housing designed to meet the needs of
those who are experiencing homelessness and formerly experiencing
homelessness are permitted, as shown in Table 6-45. Currently, the County
treats both transitional and supportive housing facilities that serve six or
fewer clients as different from those serving above this amount. These
facilities with six or fewer clients are permitted by right in all single-family
zoning districts from R-6 to R-15 as well as zone D-1. Any facilities serving
more than six clients require a land use permit in all single-family zones. In
multi-family zones, the County allows these facilities by right as well as in
land zoned for planned unit development. Facilities serving more than six
clients require a land use permit in all multi-family zones and are prohibited
in planned unit developments. Transitional and supportive housing of any
kind is forbidden in mobile home parks. Action HE-A6.1 calls for the County
to allow transitional and supportive housing in all zones where residential is
allowed in the same way other residential uses are allowed per Senate Bill
(SB) 2 (2007) and to allow supportive housing per Assembly Bill (AB) 2162
(2018) without discretionary review in areas zoned for residential use where
multi-family and mixed uses are permitted.
In addition, these facilities are permitted in most commercial and industrial
districts with a land use permit. Emergency shelters are only currently
permitted in commercial zoning districts. The purpose of the land use permit
is to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses, and not to constrain
their development. The land use permit for an emergency shelter,
supportive housing, or a transitional housing facility requires only an
administrative review unless the decision is appealed. If the administrative
decision is appealed, a hearing on the permit may be held before the Zoning
Administrator or the County Planning Commission, as necessary.
The County allows emergency shelters ‘by-right’ in the C: General
Commercial District. The C: General Commercial District has three vacant
parcels totaling 6.6 acres within this zoning district with both appropriate
distance from schools and proximity to transit. In addition, emergency
shelters may be allowed in other zoning districts with a conditional use
permit. The unincorporated county has approximately 570 persons without
nighttime shelter as of the 2020 Point-in-Time Count. Shelters will be no
larger than 75 beds. The County’s existing 75 bed emergency shelter in
Concord is approximately 16,000 square feet and has a capacity for 160
year-round beds. The County requires that an emergency shelter maintain a
minimum floor area of 125 square feet for each bed. For a 75-bed shelter,
this would be a minimum of 9,375 square feet. To address the current
unmet need of unsheltered people in the county, the county would need an
additional seven to eight emergency shelters totaling approximately 66,000
or 75,000 square feet, respectively. There are sufficient sites in the
unincorporated area of Contra Costa County zoned under the C: General
Commercial District to address the potential need for emergency shelters to
accommodate 570 unsheltered persons experiencing homelessness.
The ordinance includes specific requirements to provide certainty to the
applicant and maintain compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood.
Following are the general development standards:
6 -128 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Security features, including doors with locking deadbolts for individual
rooms, interior locks on and emergency call alarms within common
shower stalls, night-lighting for parking areas that are resistant to
vandalism and graffiti, locking windows that cannot be opened from
outside, and a client registry denoting their names and dates of stays;
• Design guidelines, including a minimum of one telephone, lockers for
personal property, lavatories in the amounts required by the California
Plumbing Code, and compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) design and accessibility requirements;
• Common facilities for the exclusive use of the clients that include a
central kitchen and one dining room, private intake area, and
counseling center;
• Additional standards apply but may be modified at the discretion of the
County:
o Siting within a half mile of an existing transit amenity (i.e., bus stop,
BART station, Amtrak station, or ferry terminal) or written agreement
to the County the shelter will provide transportation to the nearest
transit amenity if sited more than a half mile away;
o A minimum of 125 square feet of gross floor area per bed/client but
a maximum of no more than 75 beds per shelter; and
o Off-street parking for the shelter’s staff at a minimum of 2 spaces
plus 1 space for every 10 beds;
In 2019, the California Legislature adopted AB 101, which requires all local
governments, including Contra Costa County, to permit Low-Barrier
Navigation Centers for people needing housing as a by-right use in areas
that the local government has zoned for mixed uses as well as non-
residential zones that permit multi-family land uses. These centers must
provide access to permanent housing options as well as case manager
support to connect clients with public benefits (e.g., income, healthcare,
shelter, and housing assistance). Local governments may not subject
proposed centers within their planning area authority to conditional use
permits or discretionary review. Action HE-A6.1 is proposed to comply with
AB 101.
Single-Room Occupancy Facilities: The County revised the Zoning Code in
2014 to include single-room occupancy (SROs) facilities. Development
standards and permit procedures allow SROs that comply with all the
County’s design and development standards for the underlying zones within
the P-1 and R-B zoning districts with administrative review from the County’s
zoning administrator. Similar to the emergency shelter permitting process,
the administrative review process ensures that the SRO is supportive of
surrounding existing land uses and development standards, rather than to
restrict their development. If the proposal for an SRO development does not
comply with the underlying zone’s existing development standards, then the
developer must apply for a land use permit to ensure compliance with the
County’s Ordinance Code. The County specifies the minimum development
and operational standards for SROs, which include:
• Minimum cooking and dining facilities, including a range and oven,
refrigerator, and sink with garbage disposal;
• Bathroom facilities, including a flushing toilet and sink in each unit as
well as one shower for every seven units or a shower or bathtub in
each unit;
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -129
• Compliance with the County’s Building Code and Fire Code regulations
that relate to hotels;
• Design and accessibility compliance with the ADA;
• A manager’s office for SRO complexes consisting of 15 or more units;
• Security features (night lighting, locking windows and doors, occupant
registration);
In addition to the mandatory development standards listed, the following
development standards may be modified upon issuance of a land use
permit:
• Off-street parking in the amount of one space for every four units plus
one space for the SRO manager;
• Common areas consisting of 10 square feet for every unit or 150
square feet of common space, whichever is greater.
In general, emergency shelters , transitional and supportive housing, and
SROs should be accessible to the population in need and near public transit,
employment and job training opportunities, community facilities, and
services. Typically, people on public assistance are most vulnerable to
becoming homeless in the case of an economic recession or cuts in public
assistance. Areas with concentrations of CalWORKS participants and good
access to transit, employment, and services would be appropriate for the
siting of emergency and permanent supportive housing. In siting such
facilities, the County will pay special attention to issues of neighborhood
impacts.
Several emergency shelters and transitional housing facilities for persons
experiencing homelessness are in Contra Costa County. Table 6-28 in the
previous section identifies the major temporary, transitional, and permanent
housing facilities for persons experiencing homelessness and formerly
experiencing homelessness in the county.
3. Growth Management Program
Growth management programs facilitate well-planned development and
ensure that the necessary services and facilities for residents are provided.
Furthermore, the planning and land use decisions associated with growth
management intend to enhance housing opportunities by concentrating
housing in urban areas close to jobs and services, rather than in sprawling
developments that may threaten agricultural land and open space. However,
a growth management program may act as a constraint if it prevents a
jurisdiction from addressing its housing needs.
In 1988, Contra Costa County residents approved Measure C, which
increased sales tax by one half cent to fund transportation projects. In
response to growing concerns about traffic impacts of new development and
the lack of necessary funding for infrastructure development and
improvements, the measure also included a growth management
component. Measure C-1988 requires each jurisdiction to adopt a Growth
Management Element as part of its General Plan.
In 1990, Contra Costa residents expressed their concerns regarding new
development threats to the environment by approving Measure C-1990. This
measure applies to the unincorporated county and restricts urban
development to 35 percent of the land in the county. The remaining 65
percent of the land is preserved for agriculture and open space.
6 -130 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Growth Management Element – Measure C-1988
As part of the 1990-2010 General Plan, the County developed the Growth
Management Element to address the requirements of Measure C-1988. The
Element includes adopted level of service (LOS) standards for traffic for
particular types of land uses and performance standards to be maintained
through capital projects for fire protection, police, parks, sanitary facilities,
water, and flood control. These performance standards are designed to
ensure that new developments provide their fair share of the cost of
infrastructure, public facilities, and services. As a result, new developments
must demonstrate that the LOS and performance standards identified in the
Element will be met.
65/35 Land Preservation Plan and Urban Limit Line –
Measure C-1990
The 65/35 Land Preservation Plan and the ULL, adopted in 1990 under
Measure C, was intended to concentrate development in areas most suitable
for urban development. As mentioned previously, urban uses are permitted
on 35 percent of the land in the county. Certain types of land are identified
in the measure as not being appropriate for urban development, such as
prime agricultural land, open space, wetlands, or other areas unsuitable for
urban development because of environmental or other physical constraints.
The ULL established a boundary setting apart land that is suitable for urban
development from that which is not. The purpose of the ULL is to limit
potential urban encroachment by prohibiting the County from designating
any land located outside the ULL for an urban land use. Voters in Contra
Costa County approved Measure L in November 2006 establishing an
updated ULL, extending the term of the ULL to 2026, and enacting new
procedures requiring voter approval to expand the ULL by greater than 30
acres.
Implementation of Measure C 1988 and 1990 has not prevented the County
from meeting its housing obligations. Instead, the Growth Management
Program has led to a coordinated planning effort that has provided a
mechanism to support and enhance housing development throughout the
county. This has been achieved through pro-rata fees and the concentration
of development, which has enabled the County to provide the needed
services, facilities, and infrastructure at a lower cost to residents and
developers than could be achieved through unmanaged and sprawling
development. Section 4 of this Housing Element demonstrates the County’s
ability to accommodate its share of regional housing growth on residentially
designated land within the ULL.
In 2016, County staff conducted an analysis of future growth to determine if
the ULL could pose a severe constraint to housing growth and production in
the future. The County determined that if the ULL remained unchanged in
the future and development patterns used the lowest land use densities and
intensities as allowed in the land use elements of the county and the
incorporated cities that were in effect at the time, there could be an
approximate shortage of 500 housing units across the entire county. County
staff determined that this deficit in housing would be negligible because
assumptions proposed an exceptionally conservative scenario. In this
scenario, most new development centered on the remaining vacant parcels
within the ULL at the absolute lowest density. Furthermore, staff projected
that each jurisdiction in Contra Costa County could erase the potential deficit
under this scenario if they increased their housing production by less than 2
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -131
percent each year. Comparing this conservative scenario to a high-density
and -intensity scenario, County staff determined that there would be a
surplus of 43,000 housing units in excess of what all the jurisdictions in the
county would need to produce to keep pace with housing needs for
projected growth patterns. Housing affordability is also a concern with the
ULL, but County staff research shows that homes continue to be sold at all
price levels, with the highest number of homes sold in 2016 at a sales price
value between $450,000 and $750,000. Therefore, the ULL, while being an
explict constraint on urban sprawl overall, is not a direct constraint to the
production of housing to serve all income levels in Contra Costa County,
provided that the jurisdictions in the county pursue infill growth patterns and
work to upzone existing vacant parcels. Action HE-A5.1 calls for rezoning to
higher densities to address the current Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA), which will increase the development capacity inside the ULL.
4. Site Improvements and Development
Fees
Site Improvements
Site improvements are an important component of new development and
include water, sewer, circulation, and other infrastructure needed to serve
the new development. Contra Costa County requires the construction of
reasonable on-site and off-site public improvements as a condition of
approval for residential (major) subdivisions as permitted by the Subdivision
Map Act. Typical improvements required include:
• Grading and improvement of public and private streets serving the
subdivision according to adopted design standards (see Table 6-46 for
a summary of roadway design standards);
• Storm drainage and flood control facilities within and outside the
subdivision (when necessary) to carry stormwater runoff both tributary
to and originating within the subdivision;
• Stormwater management infrastructure to treat runoff from new
impervious surfaces originating within the subdivision before discharge
to off-site receiving waters;
• Public sewage system improvements according to sewer service district
standards and direct sewage system connection to each lot;
• Public water supply system improvements according to water service district
standards to provide adequate water supply and direct water system
connection to each lot;
• Fire hydrants and connection of the type and location as specified by
the relevant fire service district;
• Public utility distribution facilities, including gas, electric, telephone, and
cable television necessary to serve each lot;
• Local transit facilities, such as shelters, benches, bus turnouts, park-n-
ride lots for larger residential subdivisions.
Specific standards for a residential subdivision’s on-site and off-site
improvements must be in accordance with the County’s General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance Code, Flood Control and Drainage Ordinance Code, and
Subdivision Ordinance Code. Additionally, the County may require dedication
6 -132 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
of land for public use, such as roadways and parks. Dedicated rights-of-way
for roadways must be designed, developed, and improved according to the
County’s Roadway Design Criteria, as summarized in Table 6-46.
TABLE 6-46 ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS
Roadway Type Right-of-
Way*
Curb to
Curb Median Sidewalk
Area
Parkways 136 ft. 106 ft. 14 ft. n/a
Major Arterial 126 ft./136 ft. 106 ft. 14 ft. 8 ft.
Arterial / Industrial Collector 84 ft. 64 ft. n/a 8 ft.
Industrial Collector 68 ft. 48 ft. n/a n/a
Minor Arterial / Major Collector 60 ft. 40 ft. n/a 8 ft.
Minor Collector 56 ft. 36 ft. n/a n/a
Source: Contra Costa County staff, personal communication, 2021.
*Right-of-way width excludes areas that may be necessary to accommodate stormwater management
infrastructure appurtenant to new public streets for treatment of related stormwater runoff.
It can be reasonably inferred that the costs for the construction of on-site
and off-site improvements under the County’s residential subdivision
process does have an impact on housing supply and affordability.
Development Fees
The County requires the payment of fees for off-site extension of water,
sewer, and storm drain systems and transportation improvements. The
developer is also required to construct all internal streets, sidewalks, curb,
gutter, and affected portions of off-street arterials. New residential
construction will either occur as infill, where infrastructure is already in place,
or in planned unit districts, where the provision of adequate public services
and facilities may be required as conditions for project approval.
Development impact fees, such as capital facility fees (e.g., charges for
schools and parks), and service connection fees (e.g., sewer and water
connections), are identified in Table 6-47.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -133
TABLE 6-47 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES UNINCORPORATED AREAS
Single-Family Home Fees West Central East1
North Richmond Rodeo Pacheco Alamo Bay Point Discovery Bay
Permit/Plan Processing Fees $22,205 $22,205 $19,205 $19,205 $22,205 $19,205
Capital Facilities Fees $8,160 $8,160 $8,160 $7,580 $8,160 $8,160
Service Connection Fees $19,773 $14,329 $22,701 $10,189 $26,970 $200
Total $50,138 $44,694 $50,066 $36,974 $57,335 $27,565
1. When a residential development project falls within the boundaries of the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP), additional fees may apply. These fees
are paid for a project impacting potential habitat and are one option for mitigating impacts to, or takings of, state and federally listed threatened and endangered species (under the Endangered Species Act and California
Endangered Species Act.) The East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, Contra Costa County, and the cities of Brentwood, Clayton, Oakley, and Pittsburg oversee the permit program and issue permits on behalf
of the California Department Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. For more information, see: www.cocohcp.org.
Assumptions: Single-family 2,000 sq. ft. home with 400 sq. ft. attached garage, and wood frame construction. Source: Contra Costa County- Dept. of Conservation and Development, Building Insp. Div. Fee Estimator Program
and information provided by Special Districts, November 2021.
Multi-family Apartment Fees West Central East
North Richmond Rodeo Pacheco Alamo Bay Point Discovery Bay
Permits/Processing Fees $752,942 $752,942 $749,942 $749,942 $752,942 $749,942
Capital Facilities Fees $81,600 $81,600 $81,600 $75,800 $81,600 $81,600
Service Connection Fees $41,404 $154,054 $566,650 $49,679 $555,954 $5,000
Total $875,946 $988,596 $1,398,192 $875,421 $1,390,497 $836,542
Total Per Unit Fees $35,038 $39,544 $55,928 $35,017 $55,620 $33,462
Assumptions: Prototypical multi-family residence. Assume a 20,000 sq. ft. apartment building with 25 units. Five 3-bedroom units, 10 2-bedroom units, 10 1-bedroom units.
One structure, 2-story, and wood frame construction.
Source: Contra Costa County- Dept. of Conservation and Development, Building Insp. Div. Fee Estimator Program and information provided by Special Districts, November 2021.
6 -134 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
The County also collects fees from developments to cover the costs of
planning and processing permits. Processing fees and deposits are
calculated based on average staff time and material costs required to
process a particular type of application. The average cost of planning and
processing fees for single-family and multi-family residential development
are summarized in Table 6-47.
Planning and processing fees, combined with costs for the required site
improvements, add to the cost of housing. The average planning and
processing fees for a typical single-family home and typical 25-unit multi-
family complex have been calculated.1 The overall development impact fees
for site improvements and processing fees range from $27,565 to $57,974
for the typical single-family home built in the unincorporated area of the
county and from $33,462 to $55,928 per apartment unit. These costs vary by
unincorporated region of the county, as shown in Table 6-47, and are
representative of the development fees for new residential development
within the unincorporated area. Table 6-48 shows the development impact
fee costs as a proportion of the total development costs (including
construction and land acquisition costs). The development impact fees make
up the highest proportion of residential development costs in Pacheco,
where they consist of a total 5.5 percent of an estimated hypothetical multi-
family development. Most development impact fees consist of between 3
1 A typical single-family residence consists of a 2,000-square-foot wood frame residence with an attached 400-square-foot garage. A typical multi-family apartment
complex consists of one 20,000-square-foot apartment building with 25 units and includes 5 three-bedroom units, 10 two-bedroom units, and 10 one-bedroom units.
2 A substantial and growing portion of development fees assessed on new residential development is related to capital facilities and service connection fees collected at
the building permit stage by the County for Special Districts. Special District governing bodies establish and set these fees. The County is not involved in determining
the fee amount; it only collects the fee for the Special District at issuance of building permits and then passes on the fee revenue to the Special District.
and 6 percent of the total development cost for single- and multi-family
scenarios and therefore are not overly burdensome on their construction.
Requiring developers to construct site improvements and/or pay fees toward
the provision of infrastructure, public facilities, services, and processing will
increase the cost of housing.2 While these costs may impact housing
affordability, these requirements are deemed necessary to maintain the
quality of life desired by county residents, and are consistent with the goals
and policies of the General Plan.
If a developer owns the property, then either the developer’s profit and/or
the price of the housing will be adjusted depending on the cost of fees and
site improvements. To cover increasing costs, the developer might have to
reduce its profit. Or, if the market supports higher prices, the developer
might raise the rents or sales prices of the new housing. If the cost of fees
and improvements are excessive, and the market does not support higher
prices, then the development will not be feasible. If the developer is seeking
to purchase land, then the purchase negotiations will be impacted by the
total cost of development. The developer will try to pay less for the land to
keep a higher profit and/or lower housing costs.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -135
TABLE 6-48 PROPORTION OF FEES OF TOTAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Development Cost for a Typical Single-Family Unit
West Central East
North
Richmond Rodeo Pacheco Alamo Bay Point Discovery
Bay
Total Estimated Fees Per Unit $50,138 $44,694 $50,066 $36,974 $57,335 $27,565
Estimated Development Cost Per Unit $872,343 $866,899 $872,271 $859,179 $879,540 $849,770
Estimated Proportion of Fee Cost to Overall Development Cost Per Unit 5.7% 5.2% 5.7% 4.3% 6.5% 3.2%
Assumptions: Single-family 2,000 sq. ft. home with 400 sq. ft. attached garage, and wood frame construction. References a median vacant lot price of $395,000 and assumes a single-family construction cost of $427,205.
Source: Contra Costa County- Dept. of Conservation and Development, Building Insp. Div. Fee Estimator Program and information provided by Special Districts, November 2021.
Development Cost for a Typical Multi-family Unit
West Central East
North
Richmond Rodeo Pacheco Alamo Bay Point Discovery
Bay
Total Estimated Fees Per Unit $35,038 $39,544 $55,928 $35,017 $55,620 $33,462
Estimated Development Cost Per Unit $1,001,826 $1,006, $1,022,716 $1,001,805 $1,022,408 $1,000,250
Estimated Proportion of Fee Cost to Overall Development Cost Per Unit 3.5% 3.9% 5.5% 3.5% 5.4% 3.3%
Assumptions: Prototypical multi-family residence. Fee estimates assume a 20,000 sq. ft. apartment building with 25 units. Five 3-bedroom units, 10 2-bedroom units, 10 1-bedroom units. Construction cost estimate references
Legacy development costs per unit of $571,788.
One structure, 2-story, and wood frame construction.
Source: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, Building Insp. Div. Fee Estimator Program and information provided by Special Districts, November 2021.
6 -136 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
5. Development Permit Process
Development review and permit processing are necessary steps to ensure
that residential construction proceeds in an orderly manner, despite the cost
and time involved.
The County can encourage needed investment in the housing stock by
reducing the time and uncertainty involved in obtaining development
permits. Pursuant to the State Permit Streamlining Act, governmental delays
can be reduced by: (1) limiting processing time in most cases to one year,
and (2) by requiring agencies to specify the information needed to complete
an acceptable application.
Approval of residential development may require review and approval of one
or more discretionary applications depending on the housing type proposed
and the proposed site’s zoning. Table 6-45 describes the residential uses
that require discretionary approval by zoning district. Specifically, it details
that the following uses require discretionary approval: Transitional and
supportive housing serving more than six clients in all single-family and
multi-family zoning districts except in the P-1 zoning district; SROs in the P-1
zoning district that is non-compliant with their underlying zoning districts’
development standards; mobile home parks in the T-1 zoning district;
residential care facilities with more than six beds in the M-29, M-17, M-12, M-
9, M-6, and P-1 zoning districts; and residential care facilities with six or
fewer beds in the P-1 district. Action HE-A6.1 calls for the removal of
discretionary review for some of these uses. Discretionary applications are
often subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions.
In some cases, in addition to discretionary approvals, some projects require
approval of legislative actions by the County Board of Supervisors. Almost all
discretionary applications require public notification and a public hearing
before the County Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, or Board of
Supervisors. The processing time for residential development projects can
vary significantly. Physical constraints, environmental impacts, the response
time of applicants, and public opposition to projects all play a major role in
the processing time.
As established by County Ordinance Code Chapter 82-6, the County may
grant a land use permit to a qualified applicant seeking to develop on lands
according to their permitted land uses. Land use permits are required for a
limited number of residential projects including second residential dwellings
and some residential projects in commercial and industrial zoning districts.
Applicants must submit an application to the County’s planning personnel.
As established by Ordinance No. 85-56, incorporated as County Ordinance
Code 26-2.2002, the County requires the following for applicants seeking a
conditional use or special permit:
• A plot plan drawn to scale indicating dimensions and area of the
subject property;
• Locations of existing and proposed improvements on the subject
property;
• Names of adjoining property owners;
• Names of adjoining streets;
• Locations of existing improvements on adjacent properties;
• A statement of how the request is consistent with, and will further the
goals and objectives of the General Plan, including, but not limited to,
its community facilities element; and
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -137
• Where extreme grades exist, the direction of slope and other facts
necessary to accurately depict the request except in relation to the
subject and adjacent properties. The planning department may adopt a
form that will be used for applications.
Once submitted, the County’s Zoning Administrator has the following
authorities and discretions to act on the applicant’s proposal, as provided by
County Ordinance Code 26-2.1204:
• Hear and decide all applications for variance permits, including off-
street parking and loading requirements, highway setback
requirements, and sign requirements. Further, the zoning
administrator shall review and decide all site, development, elevations,
off-street parking, and loading and landscaping plans and drawings,
and plans and drawings for location, size, and design of signs. Where
matters covered by this paragraph are requested with the filing of a
tentative minor subdivision map, the entire application shall be
considered by the division charged with reviewing the map;
• Hear and decide all requests for conditional use permits (also referred
to as land use permits);
• Be part of the advisory agency for the purpose of passing on minor
subdivision and tentative maps, as specified in Title 9 of this code;
• Hear and decide all applications or requests for proposed entitlements
estimated to generate less than 100 peak-hour trips;
• Hear and make recommendations regarding proposed development
agreements when such agreements are processed separately from the
development project applications; and
• Hear and act on such other matters as specifically assigned by
ordinance or board resolution or order.
Required findings for a land use permit are that the proposed land use will
not cause the following:
• be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the county;
• adversely affect the orderly development of property within the county;
• adversely affect the preservation of property values and the protection
of the tax base within the county;
• adversely affect the policy and goals as set by the general plan;
• create a nuisance and/or enforcement problem within the
neighborhood or community;
• encourage marginal development within the neighborhood;
The above findings have not posed a constraint to approval of residential
projects that require a land use permit.
Apart from the County’s provisions to protect and preserve trees as well as
requiring stormwater control plans, respectively established in Section 4010
of Chapter 816-6 and Section 004 of Chapter 1014-4 of the County’s
Ordinance Code, there is no mandated design review process or body that
reviews developments proposed in the county’s unincorporated areas.
Two levels of review are involved with residential development. The first level
involves the review of conformance with the County General Plan and state
environmental requirements. If the site is not designated for residential
development under the General Plan, an amendment to the General Plan is
6 -138 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
required. The second level of review requires that the site have the
appropriate zoning for the type and amount of residential development
identified in the project; otherwise a zone change is needed. Changing a site
to a Planned Unit District includes both rezoning and a preliminary
development plan. Single-family developments often require subdivision
map approval while multi-family developments require a development plan.
Depending on the size, scope, and location, the application and processing
times for a residential development project vary (see Table 6-49).
TABLE 6-49 ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME FRAMES
Development Permit/Review Process Time Frame
Rezoning 6 to 12 months
Use Permits 4 to 6 months
Development Plans 3 to 4 months
Minor Subdivisions 4 to 6 months
Major Subdivisions 6 to 12 months*
Variances 3 to 4 months
Source: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development (August 2021).
Note: * It should be noted that approval of larger residential subdivisions (100 units or more) often take a year
or more. This is because such applications for residential development proposals invariably require an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
It should be noted that it is the experience of Contra Costa County that
larger residential subdivisions (100 units or more) often take up to 12
months or more to complete approvals and processing. This is because such
applications for residential development proposals invariably require an
environmental impact report. The length of time to finalize the
environmental impact report depends greatly on the size, scope, and
location of the residential development project, environmental issues under
review, and the extent of public comment received on the draft
environmental impact report. The amount of time between the entitlement
approval and when the application is approved for a building permit
depends on several factors, including, and not limited to, the number of
units and the developer’s financial and funding sources.
Overall, the County has taken several steps to expedite processing, reduce
costs, and clarify the process to developers and homeowners. The County
has rezoned many of the parcels in its formerly designated redevelopment
project areas as P-1 or Planned Unit Development districts to facilitate a
faster, more streamlined permit process. Furthermore, in August 1990, the
County established the Application and Permit Center. The Center is
designed to make permit processing quicker and easier by enhancing the
coordination of permitting services. The review and submittal of new
applications have been available online since 2019, with this capacity
increasing in 2020. This process has eliminated the extra time to submit
applications in person and has been very well-received by customers. The
County also offers a voluntary Pre-application Review. Developers and
homeowners can meet with staff to determine the permits necessary and
the cost and review time involved. More importantly, residential
developments under 100 units that are allowed by zoning need not be
reviewed by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors; rather they
are reviewed by the Zoning Administrator. The County makes all efforts to
process applications in an expedient manner.
The County will comply with SB 330 (Government Code Section 65589.5),
relying on regulations set forth in the law for processing preliminary
applications for housing development projects, conducting no more than five
hearings for housing projects that comply with objective General Plan and
development standards, and making a decision on a residential project
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -139
within 90 days after certification of an environmental impact report or 60
days after adoption of a mitigated negative declaration or an environmental
report for an affordable housing project. The County is proposing Action
HE-A6.1 to establish a process in compliance with SB 35 to streamline the
review of eligible affordable housing projects.
6. Building Codes and Enforcement
Contra Costa County has adopted the 2019 California Building Code (CBC),
with local amendments as deemed necessary, and the Uniform Housing
Code as Title 7 within the County’s Ordinance Code, which establish
standards and require inspections at various stages of construction to
ensure code compliance. Chapter 74-4 within Title 7 contains the local
amendments to the adopted CBC. These amendments include provisions
related to fire-suppression systems, retaining wall requirements, seismic
safety design, electric vehicle charging facilities, among others. Specifically,
the County’s local amendments require the following:
• Permit exemptions for retaining walls below three feet in height and
that have a downward ground slope with a maximum rise and run of
1:10 unless supporting surcharge or ground slope more than 1:2.
• Construction plans must be submitted on suitable materials and drawn
to scale. Electronic submissions are permissible with advanced
approval. Plans must show existing property lines, elevations, and
existing structures as well as the contact information of the landowner
and the people who prepare the plans.
• Any newly-built group R-1, R-2, R-3 buildings should include
infrastructure to support future installation of chargers for use by
electric vehicles and newly-built group R-2 must include fully-
functioning charging stations.
• Smoke detectors must be installed on existing flat-roof buildings when
a pitched roof is constructed on top of the existing structure with the
existing roof sheeting in place.
• Exterior wall cover using wood shakes or shingles must be treated for
fires unless there is a 10-foot minimum easement between the
property line and the exterior wall facing the street.
• Isolated spread concrete footings of buildings three stories or less
above grade that are fully supported on earth or rock where the
structural design of the footing is based on a specified compressive
strength of no greater than 2,500 pounds per square inch.
• Structures in Seismic Design Category C, D, E, or F shall not have
elements of structural plain concrete except when (1) isolated footings
of plain concrete supporting pedestals or concrete have the projection
of the footing beyond the face of the supporting member not in excess
of the footing thickness or (2) when plain concrete footings have at
minimum two continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars.
• Slabs shall have a reinforcement of at least 6-inch by 10-gauge wire
mesh or equal at mid-height.
• Gypsum board may be used provided it is opposite of the studs from
other types of braced wall panel sheathing and Method PCP is limited
to one-story dwellings and accessory structures.
6 -140 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Chapter 4 provisions shall apply to additions and alterations of existing
residential buildings when: (1) Projects that increase the total
combined conditioned and unconditioned area by 5,000 square feet or
more; (2) alterations to existing structures impacting 5,000 square feet
or more of total combined conditioned and unconditioned building
area; (3) demolition projects when a demolition permit is required.
• Application of Section 5.408’s requirements to additions, alterations,
and demolitions whenever a permit is required for the work except
when a demolition has been declared necessary for public health
reasons.
• New multi-family buildings apart from those in Section 4.106.4.1 must
feature electric vehicle charging spaces at a minimum of 10 percent of
the total number of parking spaces at the dwelling site, and half of
these, but not less than one, shall have fully-operational electric vehicle
supply equipment (EVSE) with the remainder supporting future EVSE.
• A minimum of 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and
demolition waste must be recycled or reused except for (1) soil
excavations and land-clearing debris and (2) if the enforcing agency
identifies alternate waste-reduction requirements.
• Submission of a construction waste management plan with updates as
necessary and must fulfill certain requirements, including identification
of the materials to be diverted from the site, statement as to whether
waste materials will be sorted on-site, identification of where the waste
materials will go, identification of construction methods to reduce
waste generated, weighing and measuring the waste in accordance
with the enforcement agency’s standards, and a final document
outlining the compliance with this requirement.
On January 18, 2022, the County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance
2022-02, an All-Electric (New Construction) Ordinance, to amend the 2019
California Energy Code to require the following building types to be all-electric:
• Residential (including single-family and multi-family buildings)
• Detached Accessory Dwelling Units
These local amendments were made to address multiple vulnerabilities in
Contra Costa County, including seismic risk, fire hazards, and communities
subject to environmental inequity. The County’s building code also requires
new residential construction to comply with the federal ADA, which specifies
a minimum percentage of dwelling units in new developments that must be
fully accessible to the physically disabled. Although these standards and the
time required for inspections increase housing production costs and may
impact the viability of rehabilitation of older properties that are required to
be brought up to current code standards, the intent of the codes is to
provide structurally sound, safe, and energy-efficient housing.
The County’s Code Enforcement Section is responsible for enforcing both
state and County regulations governing the maintenance of all buildings and
properties. Code Enforcement handles complaints and inspections in the
unincorporated areas of the County and also provides services to several
cities and towns, including Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda, Pittsburg, and Clayton,
and a portion of the City of Richmond.
Most of the complaints submitted to Code Enforcement deal with property
maintenance, substandard housing issues, and abandoned vehicles. To
facilitate the correction of code violations or deficiencies, Code Enforcement
works closely with other County agencies. Code Enforcement staff routinely
refer homeowners to the County’s rehabilitation loan and grant programs,
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -141
including the Neighborhood Preservation Program. The Division also refers
homeowners, mobile home owners, and apartment owners to the County’s
Weatherization Program. This program offers minor home repairs, water
heaters, stoves, insulation, and other improvements for housing units in the
county.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL, INFRASTRUCTURE,
AND PUBLIC SERVICE CONSTRAINTS
Environmental factors and a lack of necessary infrastructure or public
services can constrain residential development in a community by increasing
costs and reducing the amount of land suitable for housing construction.
This section summarizes and analyzes the most pertinent constraints to
housing in Contra Costa County.
1. Environmental Constraints
Environmental constraints related to seismic activity, geology/topographical,
flooding potential, or other environmental issues can impact the cost
associated with the maintenance, improvement, and development of
housing. A more detailed discussion is contained in the Safety Element of the
County General Plan. The discussion below summarizes the most pertinent
environmental constraints.
3 An earthquake-generated wave in an enclosed body of water such as a lake, reservoir, or bay.
Seismic Constraints
Contra Costa County is divided by several fault systems that divide the
county into several large blocks of rock. These faults include the San
Andreas, Hayward, Calaveras, Franklin, Concord, Antioch, Mount Diablo, and
Greenville Faults. Based on estimates from geologists, these faults have a
probable earthquake magnitude of between 5.0 and 8.5 on the Richter scale.
The area has experienced a number of major earthquakes originating on
faults both in the county and in the broader region, including most recently
the Loma Prieta Earthquake in 1989.
Seismic activity associated with faults can also cause hazards such as
liquefaction and soil settlement, slope failure, deformation of sidehill fills,
ridgetop fissuring and shattering, and seiches,3 among others. Typically,
structures on bedrock experience less groundshaking and earthquake-
related impacts than structures on recent sedimentary deposits.
Since housing in the region will likely be subject to a damaging earthquake, it
must be designed to withstand the event and protect its occupants. Without
proper mitigation, earthquakes and other seismic-related activity can have a
major impact on housing development. For development proposed in areas
with potential earthquake-induced hazards, special mitigation measures
must be included as conditions of development approval. As described in
the Safety Element, these measures may include:
6 -142 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Environmental review: Through the environmental review process, the
County requires geologic, seismic, and/or soils studies as necessary to
evaluate proposed development in areas subject to ground-shaking,
fault displacement, or liquefaction.
• Improved construction design: Staff review of applications may require
modified seismic strengthening and detailing to meet the latest
adopted seismic design criteria.
• Setbacks: Require that structures are adequately setback from active
and potentially active fault traces.
Fire Hazard Constraints
Fire hazards, particularly wildland fires, can represent a considerable
constraint to residential development without appropriate mitigation
measures and the availability of firefighting services.4 However, this
constraint is primarily limited to development that is adjacent to the ULL
where there is more open space and typically a greater amount of
vegetation. Areas of the county outside the ULL that are covered with natural
vegetation and dry-farmed grained areas are extremely flammable during
the late summer and fall. These types of wildland or brush fires are a
particular threat to home sites with large areas of non-irrigated vegetation.
Most of the county is identified as susceptible to moderate wildland fire
hazards, while isolated areas in the western and central areas of the county
4 Pursuant to SB 1241 (Kehoe, Statutes of 2012), concurrent with the 2023 - 2031 Housing Element Update, the Safety Element will be reviewed and updated as necessary
to address the risk of fire hazard in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones.
have a high or very high susceptibility. Another special hazard in the East
County is peat fires. Once peat fires occur, they are extremely difficult to
extinguish. Any area east of the high-water line may have peaty soil
conditions. However, most of these areas with a moderate to high
susceptibility to fire hazards are located beyond the ULL boundary where
development is limited and the areas are primarily used as open space and
for agricultural operations. Identified Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones
occur mainly along communities on the eastern side of Berkeley Hills,
especially near El Sobrante as well as further east in Mt. ? Diablo.
The Safety Element and the Public Facilities and Services Element of the
County General Plan contain policies and measures designed to protect the
public and housing from these fire hazards, particularly beyond the ULL.
Some of these policies are identified below.
• Projects that encroach into areas that have a high or extreme fire
hazard must be reviewed by the appropriate Fire Bureau to determine
if special fire prevention measures are advisable.
• Major developments will not be approved if fire-fighting services are
not available or are not adequate for the area.
• New development will pay for its fair share of costs for new fire
protection facilities and services.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -143
• Needed upgrades to fire facilities and equipment will be identified as
part of project environmental review and area planning activities to
reduce fire risk and improve emergency response in the county.
Additionally, the state legislature adopted SB 99 (2019) in response to the
destruction observed with the 2018 Camp Fire that razed Paradise,
California. To ensure public safety and ability to evacuate quickly, the state
requires all new residential developments in a fire hazard severity zone to
have a minimum of two entry/exit points to access emergency evacuation
routes. The Draft Safety Element will contain an analysis of the residential
developments in the unincorporated county that comply with this law.
Flood Hazard Constraints
Substantial areas within Contra Costa County are subject to flooding, with
most of the county’s creeks and shoreline areas lying in the 100-year flood
plain.5 The land inventory for residential sites includes an analysis of flood
hazard constraints, and sites lying in the 100-year flood plain. A substantial
portion of East County near the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is subject to
flooding. The most serious flood hazards are associated with the system of
levees that protect the islands and adjacent mainland in the Delta area. As
with fire hazards, the majority of the area subject to flooding, particularly in
the eastern part of the county, is beyond the ULL boundary in areas where
development is restricted. Nonetheless, the County’s 2018 Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan identifies that approximately 66 percent of the potentially
5 Pursuant to AB 162 (Wolk, Statutes of 2007) and SB 5 (Machado, Statutes of 2007), concurrent with the 2023 - 2031 Housing Element Update, the flood hazard map,
and related flood hazard policies and measures, contained in the Safety Element will be reviewed and updated as necessary to reflect new information regarding flood
hazard risks, including the best available maps that identify the risks associated with a 200-year flood event.
developable land in the dam/levee failure inundation zone of the county
could become residential uses (1,730.7 acres) and approximately 4 percent
(113.3 acres) could become mixed-use (including housing) under the
currently adopted Land Use Element. Some areas with land uses permitting
housing in the inundation zone may be updated as part of the General Plan
Update to protect the health, safety, and well-being of county inhabitants.
General policies and specific measures in the existing Safety Element are
designed to protect persons and structures from hazards related to
flooding. These include:
• Intensive urban and suburban development is not permitted in
reclaimed areas unless flood protection in such areas is constructed, at
a minimum, to the standards of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973.
• The creek setback ordinance requires appropriate setbacks for
residential and commercial structures to prevent property damage
from bank failure along natural water courses.
• The environmental review process ensures that potential flooding
impacts are adequately addressed through appropriate mitigation
measures, such as flood-proofing, levee protection, and Delta
reclamation.
6 -144 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Geologic/Topographical Constraints
The presence of steep hillsides and the risk of landslides and erosion can
restrict housing development in certain areas of the county and may require
specific mitigation measures to ensure the safety of structures and their
inhabitants. Much of the topography of the county includes hilly terrain and
it also has a high proportion of recent, poorly consolidated geologic
formations that are prone to slope failure. As a result, many of these areas
have been placed outside the ULL to restrict development in these areas
and ensure public safety.
Apart from earthquakes, unstable hill slopes, reclaimed wetlands, and marsh
fill areas, which may suffer landslides, slumping, soil slips, and rockslides are
considered a major geologic hazard in these areas of Contra Costa County.
Liquefaction is also a concern in areas of the county near major bodies of
water, especially on the county’s western section along San Pablo Bay; the
north section along Suisun Bay; and the eastern section along the
Sacramento River, Old River, and Discovery Bay.
To protect persons and property from these types of geologic/topographical
hazards, the County has recognized that major slope areas in excess of 26
percent may be unsuitable for development. In addition, the County has
adopted a Hillside Preservation Ordinance to prevent development in areas
that are hazardous for persons or structures. Additional measures and
policies affecting housing development identified in the Safety Element
include:
• Slope stability is a primary consideration in the ability of land to be
developed or designated for urban uses.
• Slope stability is given careful scrutiny in the design of developments
and structures, and in the adoption of conditions of approval and
required mitigation measures.
• Residential density shall decrease as slope increases, especially above
a 15-percent slope.
• Subdivisions approved on hillsides that include individual lots to be
resold at a later time will be large enough to provide flexibility in finding
suitable building site and driveway location.
In general, the County has taken important measures to ensure that the
areas designated for urban development (i.e., those areas lying within the
ULL boundary) are safe and suitable for residential development. Major
areas subject to flooding and fire hazards, as well as areas with particularly
steep hillsides have been placed outside the ULL to restrict inappropriate
and unsafe development there. While earthquakes affect the entire region,
adequate measures identified both in the Safety Element and contained in
the Uniform Building and Housing Codes are incorporated into
developments to ensure that structures are designed to withstand these
events and protect their inhabitants.
The updated Safety Element, which is being prepared cas part of the
Comprehensive General Plan Update in progress, will include additional new
policies to further promote hazard reduction. Those policies will enhance
public safety without significantly augmenting the cost of development.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -145
6.4 Housing Resources
This section analyzes the resources available for the development,
rehabilitation, and preservation of housing in the unincorporated areas of
Contra Costa County. This analysis includes an evaluation of the availability of
land resources for future housing development, the County’s ability to satisfy
its share of the region’s future housing needs, the financial resources
available to support housing activities, and the administrative resources
available to assist in implementing the County’s housing programs.
Additionally, this section examines opportunities for energy conservation.
A. AVAILABILITY OF SITES FOR HOUSING
The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is responsible for
developing the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), which assigns a
share of the region’s future housing need to each jurisdiction in the ABAG
region. State law requires communities to demonstrate that they have
sufficient land to accommodate their share of the region’s need for housing
from June 30, 2022, through December 15, 2030, the County’s RHNA
projection period. This timeframe differs from the timeframe of the Housing
Element document itself of January 31, 2023 through January 31, 2031. The
RHNA projection period is the timeframe which residential units can be
counted towards the County’s 6th cycle RHNA. For the 6th cycle RHNA
projection period, ABAG has determined that the County’s share of the
RHNA is 7,610 new housing units (see Table 6-32 for the County’s RHNA
share.) This section identifies the development potential through projected
accessory dwelling units and on suitable land throughout the
unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County.
1. Site Inventory
An important component of the Housing Element required by State Housing
Element law (Government Code Section 65583.2) is the identification of sites
for future housing development, and evaluation of the adequacy of these
sites in fulfilling the County’s share of regional housing needs as determined
by ABAG. As part of the 2023-2031 Housing Element update, an analysis of
the residential development potential in each of the unincorporated
communities of Contra Costa County was conducted. In addition, a parcel-
specific vacant and underutilized site analysis was performed using the
County’s Geographic Information System (GIS) and up-to-date information
from the County Assessor’s records.
The analysis takes into consideration a range of factors, including permitted
density, parcel size, potential for lot consolidation, development constraints
relating to topography, potential hazards, and other physical and
environmental issues, location and housing demand, as well as available
development tools and incentives such as planned unit development.
Factors related to fair housing were also considered based on the
Assessment of Fair Housing in Section 6.2.
In addition to identifying vacant or underutilized land resources, local
governments can address a portion of their adequate sites requirement
through the provision of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Action HE-A2.5 is
included in Section 6.7, Housing Plan, to commit the County to supporting
ADU development.
6 -146 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Accessory Dwelling Unit Potential
In 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, County permit records indicate that an
average of 64 ADUs received building permits per year.
• 2018 - 47 ADUs received building permits
• 2019 - 62 ADUs received building permits
• 2020 - 48 ADUs received building permits
• 2021 – 100 ADUs received building permits
Based on the average of 64 ADUs per year, an additional 546 ADUs can be
projected for the 2022-2030 6th cycle projection period. The Association of
Bay Area Governments (ABAG) prepared a Draft Affordability of Accessory
Dwelling Units report for the entire ABAG region in early 2022. The analysis
made findings for the affordability of ADUs based on data gathered on
current rents and occupancy of ADUs, in addition to industry research about
affordability levels of ADUs, including those that do not reach the rental
market. In addition, ADU research conducted by the University of California,
Berkeley’s (UC Berkeley’s) Center for Community Innovation indicates that 40
percent of ADUs are typically rented to family members or friends at either
no cost or below-market rental rates.1 Table 6-55 shows the projected 546
ADUs broken into income categories based on the ABAG analysis. The
1 Chapple et al., 2017, UC Berkeley’s Center for Community Innovation. Jumpstarting the Market for Accessory Dwelling Units: Lessons Learned from Portland, Seattle,
and Vancouver.
County’s ADU regulations encourage this housing type and allow flexibility in
their development.
Housing Units Constructed or Approved
Some units the County proposes to count toward meeting the RHNA are on
sites with approved projects. The units on these sites are shown in Table
6-50. The County anticipates that these approved units will be completed
within the 2023-2031 planning period.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -147
TABLE 6-50 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS APPROVED OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION
County File No.
Project Name APN(s) Acreage Community
Current General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Proposed General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Status Units Affordability Level
SD13-9338 "Ball Estates"
198170006,
198262002,
198262003,
198262004 and
198170008
61.7 Alamo SL (1-2.9 du/ac)
OS (Open Space)
RL (1-3 du/ac)
RC (Resource
Conservation)
Approved 35 Above Moderate: 35
Total: 35
SD18-9504 201010007 3.52 Alamo SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RL (1-3 du/ac) Approved 6 Above Moderate: 6
Total: 6
BIMR19-011850 197010029 0.23 Alamo MM (12- 20.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Under
Construction 3 Above Moderate: 3
Total: 3
GP13-0001, SD13-9340,
DP13-3027 “Habitat for
Humanity Pacifica
Landing”
098210001 2.35 Bay Point SM (3-4.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Approved 29
Above Moderate: 22
Moderate: 3
Lower: 4
Total: 29
Subject to Inclusionary
Ordinance
DP20-3011 "Alves Lane" 093100059 and
093100060 3.85 Bay Point MM (12- 20.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Under
Construction 100
Above Moderate: 87
Lower : 13
Total: 100
DSD17-09467,
DP17-03017 096020081 0.62 Bay Point ML (7.3-11.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Under
Construction 7 Above Moderate: 7
Total: 7
SD60-013CC,
DP82-03024CC
Large number of
APNs, not all
individually listed
n/a Bethel Island SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RM (7-17 du/ac) Under
Construction 329 Above Moderate: 329
Total: 329
SD60-013CC,
DP82-03024CC,
LL22-0011, ZZ22-0198,
BIGS22-003758
031010012 14.29 Bethel Island SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RM (7-17 du/ac) Under
Construction 55 Above Moderate: 55
Total: 55
6 -148 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
County File No.
Project Name APN(s) Acreage Community
Current General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Proposed General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Status Units Affordability Level
GP07-00009,
DP10-03008
"Tassajara Parks"
220100023 154.89 Camino
Tassajara
SH (5-7.2 du/ac)
PR (Parks and Recreation)
RLM (3-7 du/ac)
PR (Park and Recreation) Approved 125 Above Moderate: 125
Total: 125
DP21-3001, SD21-9559,
RZ21-3258
172012008,
172012020,
172012021,
172012023,
172012020,
172012025 and
172012028
5.4 Contra Costa
Centre MH (21- 29.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Approved 125
Above Moderate: 115
Moderate : 10
Total: 125
DP18-3031
“Del Hombre
Apartments”
148170051 2.36 Contra Costa
Centre MS (50-125 du/ac) RVH (70-125 du/ac) Under
Construction 284
Above Moderate: 248
Moderate: 24
Lower: 12
Total: 284
Subject to Inclusionary
Ordinance
GP 19-0002 “Pantages”
011230007,
011230006,
011220010,
011220017 and
011220018
157.06 Discovery
Bay
SH (5-7.2 du/ac)
OS (Open Space)
PR (Parks and Recreation)
RLM (3-7 du/ac)
RC (Resource
Conservation)
PR (Park and Recreation)
Approved 277
Above Moderate: 236
Moderate: 33
Lower: 8
Total: 277
Subject to Inclusionary
Ordinance
GP08-0002 “Newport
Pointe”
011220013 and
011220014 20.8 Discovery
Bay
SM (3-4.9 du/ac)
SH (5-7.2 du/ac)
OS (Open Space)
PR (Parks and Recreation)
RLM (3-7 du/ac)
RC (Resource
Conservation)
PR (Park and Recreation)
Approved 67 Above Moderate: 67
Total: 67
SD05-08986, DP05-
03038 , BIGS19-010697 425110027 1.17 El Sobrante ML (7.3-11.9 du/ac) MUL (0- 30 du/ac) Approved 10 Above Moderate: 10
Total: 10
DP16-03011
SD15-09407
430152092 thru
430152095 1.12 El Sobrante M-12 (check) MUL (0- 30 du/ac) Approved 8 Above Moderate: 8
Total: 8
SD18-9491 403202011 2.76 Montalvin
Manor M-9 (7.3-11.9 du/ac) RM (7-17 du/ac) Approved 33 Above Moderate: 33
Total: 33
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -149
County File No.
Project Name APN(s) Acreage Community
Current General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Proposed General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Status Units Affordability Level
SD05-9065 DP05-03095,
BIPRJ22-00007
375311001 and
375311003 1.45 Mountain
View MH (21- 29.9 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Under
Construction 30 Above Moderate: 30
Total: 30
BIR19-012635 409172019 0.23 North
Richmond SH (5-7.2 du/ac) RMH (17- 30 du/ac) Under
Construction 2 Above Moderate: 2
Total: 2
DP21-3019 “Rodeo II
Senior Housing” 357120074 0.99 Rodeo MS (50-125 du/ac) RVH (70-125 du/ac) Approved 67 Lower: 67
Total: 67
SD14-09367
357140058,
357140059 and
357140060
0.33 Rodeo M-1 ( ? du/ac) MUM (30- 75 du/ac) Under
Construction 6 Above Moderate: 6
Total: 6
RD20-00001
BIR21-004148 357042008 0.07 Rodeo M-2 ( ? du/ac) MUM (30- 75 du/ac) Under
Construction 1 Above Moderate: 1
Total: 1
MS16-00009 357140062 thru
357140064 0.42 Rodeo M-1 ( ? du/ac) MUM (30- 75 du/ac) Approved 3 Above Moderate: 3
Total: 3
DP18-3021,
BICO21-009177,
CV21-0065
357151002 0.56 Rodeo M-2 ( ? du/ac) MUM (30- 75 du/ac) Approved 22
Above Moderate: 19
Lower : 3
Total: 22
GP13-0003, RZ13-3224,
SD13-9359, DP13-3035
"Saranap Village"
184010035,
184010046,
184450025,
185370010,
185370012,
185370018 and
185370033
3.44 Saranap M-15 (53.5 du/ac) MUM (30- 75 du/ac) Approved 198 Above Moderate: 198
Total: 198
GP04-0013, DP04-3080,
RZ04-3148, SD04-8809
"Bayview Estates"
380030046 78.65 Vine Hill SH (5-7.2 du/ac)
OS (Open Space)
RM (7-17 du/ac)
RC (Resource
Conservation)
Approved 144 Above Moderate: 144
Total: 144
SD20-9545 161150009 9.89 Vine Hill SH (5-7.2 du/ac) RLM (3-7 du/ac) Approved 38 Above Moderate: 38
Total: 38
MS14-00009 380231020 0.31 Vine Hill SH (5-7.2 du/ac) RM (7-17 du/ac) Approved 2 Above Moderate: 2
Total: 2
CDDP15-03004 426261050 0.2 El Sobrante M-12 MUL (0- 30 du/ac) Approved 3 Above Moderate: 3
Total: 3
6 -150 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
County File No.
Project Name APN(s) Acreage Community
Current General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Proposed General Plan
Land Use & Density
(units/acre)
Status Units Affordability Level
CDSD21-09573 161280005 1.98 Vine Hill SH (5-7.2 du/ac) RLM (3-7 du/ac) Approved 7 Above Moderate: 7
Total: 7
SD16-9442
169150012,
169150013,
169150014,
169150015
9.59 Reliez Valley SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RL (1-3 du/ac) Approved 4 Above Moderate: 4
Total: 4
SD16-9429
166210018,
166210019,
166210020,
166210021,
166210022,
166210023,
166210024,
166210025,
166210026
7.64 Reliez Valley SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RL (1-3 du/ac) Approved 9 Above Moderate :9
Total: 9
MS15-0008
166240037,
166240038,
166240039
2.23 Reliez Valley SL (1-2.9 du/ac) RL (1-3 du/ac) Approved 3 Above Moderate: 3
Total: 3
TOTALS 2,032
Above Moderate:
1,855
Moderate: 60
Lower: 107
Total: 2,032
Source: Contra Costa County, 2022
Sites Inventory
The County’s land inventory for the 2023 – 2031 Housing Element timeframe
is included in Appendix A. The majority of the sites are proposed to receive a
change in land use designation and allowed density as part of the
comprehensive General Plan update currently underway. If the current
allowed density and General Plan designations and zoning will remain, the
site is listed in Table A of Appendix A. If a change to General Plan land use
and/or zoning is needed, the site is listed in Table B of Appendix A.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -151
Realistic Development Capacity
The assumed realistic capacity for housing development for all parcels in the
land inventory is a proportional share of the maximum densities allowed.
Realistic units are rounded down to the next-lowest whole number.
However, all of the parcels in the land inventory can accommodate at least
one unit per parcel, so parcels that would round down to zero units are
instead rounded up to allow one unit on the parcel. This section looks at
historic development trends for lower- and higher-density residential
projects in the unincorporated county to determine realistic percentages of
maximum allowable density to calculate units shown in Appendix A on the
sites. If a parcel listed in Appendix A is already part of an approved project,
the realistic units are based on that approved project.
Sites that allow higher-density housing types at 30 units per acre and above
are considered suitable for lower-income households in Contra Costa
County, per state set default densities. In addition, also per state law, sites in
land use designations and zoning districts that allow a minimum density of
30 dwelling units per acre can calculate realistic development capacity based
on the size of the site multiplied by the minimum allowed density. There are
sites in the sites inventory that are proposed to receive minimum densities
of either 30 or 75 dwelling units per acre that propose to accommodate
lower-income units. This method of calculating realistic capacity is used on
those sites. The supporting trends and proposed realistic development
capacity for the remaining sites in the inventory are discussed below.
Parcels that allow lower densities (0-17 du/ac) are what is most typically
included in this inventory to address the above moderate RHNA numbers. All
of the sites that address the moderate income RHNA allow 30 du/ac or
higher but are smaller sized sites than most sites addressing lower income
RHNA units. Because developing greater density on smaller sites can be
more difficult, these sites are considered more suitable for addressing the
moderate income RHNA.
To estimate reasonable residential potential on individual parcels in the land
inventory that could accommodate more than one unit per parcel, a realistic
assumption of 80 percent of maximum allowed density was used to estimate
a realistic number of dwelling units that would likely develop on each parcel.
Table 6-51 presents recent projects in medium- and lower-density areas of
the county that support an assumption 80 percent of maximum allowed
density. The average percent of allowed density of the listed projects
exceeded 80 percent of allowed unit capacity.
To estimate reasonable residential potential on individual parcels in the land
inventory that could accommodate higher density multifamily projects, a
realistic assumption of 85 percent of the maximum allowed density was used
to estimate a realistic number of dwelling units that would likely develop on
each parcel. This is based on the development standards and historic
development trends on sites that allow higher-density multifamily
development. Multiple residential or mixed-use projects containing
multifamily housing have been constructed or recently approved in
unincorporated Contra Costa County (see Table 6-52 for representative
projects). Representative approved and built projects in Table 6-52 support
realistic capacity assumptions of 85 percent. The average built density for
projects in Table 6-52 is 114 percent of the maximum allowed density.
6 -152 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
TABLE 6-51 REPRESENTATIVE MEDIUM- AND LOWER-DENSITY PROJECTS IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
County File No.
Project Name APN(s) Acreage
Entitled, Under
Construction, or
Completed?
Zone
Previously
Developed
with/ Existing
Uses
Project
Description
Total Number
of Dwelling
Units
Built
Density
Percentage
of Allowed
Capacity
SD07-09174,
'Summer Hills Park'
166010042 thru
166010050 6 Completed in 2015 SL/R-20
1-2.9 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 9 2 du/ac 66%
DP13-03022
SD13-09352
GP13-00002
"Driftwood Dr"
098590001 thru
098590050 7.8 Completed in 2018 SH/P-1
5-7.2 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 50 8.25 du/ac 115%
DP07-03035
DP04-03031
SD04-08830
"Sea Breeze II"
098580001 thru
098580017 3.51 Completed in 2014 SH/P-1
5-7.2 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 17 6.4 du/ac 89%
SD04-08902 095060017 thru
095060024 1.53 Completed in 2014 SH/P-1
5-7.2 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 8 7.0 du/ac 97%
DP04-03048 161570001 thru
161570020 2.47 Completed in 2018 ML/P-1
7.3-11.9 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 20 10.8 du/ac 90%
SD-6844,
CV15-00075
166420001 thru
166420006,
166420014 thru
166420019,
166420028,
166420029,
166010034 and
166010056 thru
166010058
13.25 Completed in 2020 SL/R-20
1-2.9 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 16 1.6 du/ac 57%
SD18-09495,
RZ18-03244
117040023 thru
117040030 3.4 Completed in 2021 SL/R-15
1-2.9 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 8 3.1 du/ac 106%
MS00-00003,
CV16-00055,
CV14-00041
192210028 thru
192210030 3.3 Completed in 2019 SV/R-40
0.2-0.9 du/ac No Single Family
Houses 3 0.82 du/ac 91%
AVERAGE PERCENT
OF ALLOWED
CAPACITY
89%
Source: Contra Costa County, 2022
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -153
TABLE 6-52 REPRESENTATIVE MULTIFAMILY HIGHER-DENSITY PROJECTS IN UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Address/
Project Name APN(s) Acreage
Entitled,
Under
Construction,
or
Completed?
Zone
Previously
Developed
With/
Existing Uses
Project Description
Total Number
of Dwelling
Units
Maximum
Allowed
Density
Built
Density
Percentage
of Allowed
Capacity
Heritage Point
1500/1540 Fred Jackson Way,
North Richmond
DP14-0326
409080028,
40908001,
409080014,
409080015,
409080016,
409080020,
409080026
0.69 Completed in
2019 P-1
Single-family,
vacant
commercial,
and vacant
underutilized
parcels
Rental project owned
by CHDC of North
Richmond
42
(41 affordable) 50 du/ac 60
du/ac 117%
Del Hombre Apartments
3010 thru 3070 Del Hombre
Ln and 112 Roble Rd,
Pleasant Hill BART project,
Unincorporated Walnut Creek
DP18-03031
148170041,
148170037,
148170001,
148170022,
148170042
2.37 Under
construction P-1
Four Single
family
residences
Rental project owned
by Hanover/Del
Hombre Walnut
Creek holdings
284
(12 very low
and 24
moderate)
100 du/ac 119
du/ac 119%
214 Center Ave.,
Pacheco 125120017 0.41
small site
Under
construction P-1 Vacant lot Ownership project 8
(1 moderate) 19 19.5 102%
Willow View Apartments
3600 – 3628 Willow Pass
Road, Bay Point
098240064 7.34 Completed in
2021 P-1 Vacant lot
Rental project owned
by Meta Housing
Corporation
193
(19 affordable) 21.99 26 119%
AVERAGE PERCENT OF
ALLOWED CAPACITY 114%
Source: Contra Costa County, 2022
Inventory of Sites
Sites in addition to those with approved projects listed in Table 6-50 are
identified to address the County’s RHNA. These are summarized in Table
6-53 by community. Details about each site are included in the tables and
maps in Appendix A. Tables with additional details are also inluded in
Appendix A for sites that include units to address the lower-income RHNA.
6 -154 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
TABLE 6-53 VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED RESIDENTIAL SITES
ANALYSIS
Community Total No. of Parcels Potential No. of Units
Alamo 15 351
Bay Point 142 2,965
Bay View 5 969
Byron 2 184
Clyde 1 1
Contra Costa Centre 6 458
Crockett 17 21
Discovery Bay 4 494
East Richmond Heights 5 50
El Sobrante 103 1,184
Montalvin Manor 3 410
North Richmond 134 554
Pacheco 7 113
Pleasant Hill (unincorporated) 2 8
Reliez Valley 1 1
Rodeo 26 275
San Pablo 1 18
Saranap 1 1
Tara Hills 2 20
Vine Hill 30 430
Walnut Creek (unincorporated) 22 978
Total: 529 9,485
Source: Contra Costa County 2022
Note:
1. The two APNs in Mountain View are part of a submitted application. Other parcels are not included for
Mountain View due to constraints related to water and wastewater service.
Small Sites
Some of the sites included in the sites inventory to address the lower-
income RHNA consist of multiple parcels, some of which are smaller than 0.5
acres, and some sites included are one parcel that is smaller than 0.5 acres.
Only sites that correspond to a similar track record of development under
the same owner or those with strong potential for parcel assemblage or
consolidation due to owner interest and/or common ownership have been
included in the inventory to address the lower-income RHNA. (see Appendix
A sites exhibits). A successful example of projects containing multifamily
housing on a parcel smaller than 0.5 acres has been included in Table 6-52.
The County has also included Action HE-A5.5 to encourage and facilitate
parcel assemblage.
Potential Hazards
Some residential neighborhoods and sites listed in the Sites Inventory are
vulnerable to fire, flooding and other hazards risks in unincorporated Contra
Costa County. Some potential housing sites have been eliminated from the
sites inventory due to their location in hazard zones. Hazards are discussed
in more detail in Section 6.3.C of this element. The existing Safety Element
includes policies that minimize risk to existing homes and sites identified in
the Sites Inventory related to hazards. The updated Safety Element, which is
being prepared currently as part of the Comprehensive General Plan
Update, will include additional new policies to further promote hazard
reduction. Those policies will enhance public safety without significantly
augmenting the cost of development.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -155
Infrastructure and Public Service
Constraints
A lack of adequate infrastructure or public services and facilities can be a
substantial constraint to residential development if it is to avoid impacting
existing residents. In fact, according to the National Association of Home
Builders, ensuring that the construction of schools, roads and other
infrastructure keeps pace with the anticipated growth in population and
economic activity is one of the biggest challenges facing local and regional
governments.2
As part of the Growth Management Program, the County conducts an
evaluation of the remaining infrastructure capacity. This includes an analysis
of areas not adequately served by infrastructure. This process enables the
County to identify constraints to the provision of services and facilities in a
given area and better plan for cost-effective and efficient growth.
The General Plan, as the principal document regulating growth and
development in the county, contains service standards that establish a
linkage between new development accommodated in the Plan and new
facilities and/or services required to meet demands created by new
development. The Growth Management Element contains the implementing
programs and service standard requirements that facilitate the attainment of
goals and objectives of the Land Use, Public Facilities and Services, and
Housing Elements of the General Plan.
2 National Association of Home Builders, Smart Growth: Building Better Places to Live, Work and Play. May 2000.
3 Judy Corbett and Joe Velasquez. “The Ahwahnee Principles: Toward More Livable Communities,” Western City. September 1994.
These standards ensure that the infrastructure and public services and
facilities are in place to serve that development within the ULL. The
standards are implemented through payment of fees and exaction and site
improvements discussed earlier in this section. However, it is important to
note that intensive residential development on infill sites can create
additional challenges to existing infrastructure and public services. This is
particularly true in areas with aging infrastructure or public facilities that are
already strained in serving the needs of current residents.
Many of the County’s affordable housing developments are located in infill
locations in areas already served by existing infrastructure. While such infill
sites are beneficial in that they don’t require the extension of services,
provide housing near public transit and jobs, encourage economic growth in
urban areas, and thus promote “smart growth” development principles 3,
they may face other challenges to development. Infill sites in the County’s
older communities may require upgrading existing infrastructure systems to
support more intense development, such as roadway improvements and
replacement of undersized sewer and water lines. Other constraints to the
development of infill sites include site assembly and clean-up; relocation;
compatibility with surrounding land uses; and potential neighborhood
opposition.
There are 34 unincorporated communities (defined as Census designated
places) in Contra Costa County, which are within the county’s ULL, that
receive water and sanitary sewer services from multiple providers, including
single purpose agencies, special districts, community service districts, county
service areas, and private companies. The water and sanitary service
6 -156 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
providers for the unincorporated communities is detailed further in the next
section. Government Code Section 65589.7 requires water and sewer
providers to establish specific procedures and grant priority water and sewer
service to residential developments with units affordable to lower-income
households. The statute also requires local governments to immediately
deliver the Housing Element to water and sewer providers.
The adequacy of the public infrastructure to serve new residential
development is central to the County’s planning process. The Growth
Management and Public Facilities/Services Elements to the General Plan
establish performance measures for infrastructure, including water and
sewer. New residential development must receive written verification for
both water and sewer services prior to the final subdivision map or issuance
of a building permit. Additionally, Senate Bill 610 and Senate Bill 211 (which
both took effect as of January 1, 2002) require that extensive, specific
information about water availability be presented and considered by cities
and counties in connection with residential subdivisions of a certain size.
Cities and counties are required to contact the responsible water agency
proposed to serve the residential subdivision to determine whether water
supplies are sufficient to serve the project. Information from water and
sewer agencies about supply and system capacity is also presented in a
residential project’s environmental review analysis prepared under CEQA.
Water and Wastewater Services
All of the sites identified in the inventory are likely to be able to access water
and wastewater services from a Special District This section describes these
Special Districts, including the availability of water and wastewater services
and recent or planned infrastructure improvement projects related to
storage, treatment, collection, and distribution that may affect development
in the respective areas. Figures 6-26 through 6-29 display the water and
wastewater service provider service areas in the county. Table 6-54 lists
unincorporated communities where sites in the Housing Element’s land
inventory are located and identifies which district could provide the following
services: source water, water delivery, wastewater collection, and wastewater
treatment to the sites.
Priority Water and Sewer Services for
Affordable Housing
Government Code Section 65589.7 requires public agencies and private
entities providing water or sewer services to adopt written policies and
procedures with objective standards for provision of services in compliance
with the law. For example, a public agency or private entity that provides
water or sewer services shall not deny or condition the approval of an
application for services to, or reduce the amount of services applied for by, a
proposed residential development with affordable housing units unless the
agency or entity makes specific written findings per Government Code
Section 65589.7. In accordance with California Government Code, Section
655589.7, Central Contra Costa Sanitation District and East Bay Municipal
Utility District have adopted policies that prioritize connections for affordable
housing. On December 4, 2008, the Board of Directors for Central Contra
Costa Sanitation District (CCCSD) adopted Resolution 2008-114. The
resolution identified that developments with housing units affordable to
lower-income households will be given priority for wastewater connection
services. The resolution requires the district to prepare a wastewater utility
service capacity report every five years for Board acceptance. The report will
identify CCCSD’s available wastewater collection capacity and help anticipate
sewer services demands for lower-income households as well as formulate
approaches to address capacity shortfalls. Another district that specifically
prioritizes connections to affordable housing is East Bay Municipal Utility
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -157
District (EBMUD). On April 26, 2016, EBMUD’s Board of Directors approved
Policy 3.07, which gives priority for new water service connections during
restrictive periods to proposed developments within EBMUD’s existing
service area that include housing units affordable to lower-income
households.
Urban Water Management Plans
In accordance with California Water Code, Sections 10610-10656 and 10608,
every urban water supplier that either provides over 3,000 acre-feet of water
annually or serves more than 3,000 urban connections is required to submit
an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). The plan is prepared by urban
water suppliers every five years to support the suppliers’ long-term resource
planning to ensure that adequate water supplies are available to meet
existing and future water needs.
6 -158 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
FIGURE 6-26 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICTS
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -159
FIGURE 6-27 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICTS
6 -160 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
TABLE 6-54 COMMUNITIES AND SERVICE DISTRICTS
Community
Number
of Parcels
in the
Inventory
Dwelling
Units in
Inventory
of Sites
Central
Contra
Costa
Sanitary
District
Contra
Costa
Water
District
Crockett
Community
Services
District
Delta
Diablo
Sanitation
District
Diablo
Water
District
Discovery
Bay
Community
Services
District
East Bay
Municipal
Utility
District
Mountain
View
Sanitary
District
Rodeo
Sanitary
District*
Stege
Sanitary
District
West
County
Wastewater
District
Alamo 15 351 Wastewater Water
Bay Point 142 2,965 Water
Source Wastewater
Bayview 5 969 Water Wastewater
Byron 2 184 The two parcels in Byron make up one site with a pending project that has its water and wastewater service worked out with the County. See Appendix A for more
information on this site.
Clyde 1 1 Wastewater Water
Contra Costa
Centre 6 458 Wastewater Water
Crockett* 17 21 Wastewater Water
Discovery Bay 4 494 Water and
Wastewater
East Richmond
Heights 5 50 Water Wastewater
El Sobrante 103 1,184 Water Wastewater
Montalvin
Manor 3 410 Water Wastewater
North Richmond 134 554 Water Wastewater
Pacheco 7 113 Wastewater Water
Pleasant Hill
(unincorporated) 2 8 Wastewater Water
Reliez Valley 1 1 Wastewater Water
Rodeo 26 306 Water Wastewater
San Pablo 1 18 Water Wastewater
Saranap 1 1 Wastewater Water
Tara Hills 2 20 Water Wastewater
Vine Hill 30 430 Water Wastewater
Walnut Creek
(unincorporated) 22 978 Wastewater Water
*One site in Crockett
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -161
Summary of Districts’ Services
Central Contra Costa Sanitation District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides wastewater
collection. CCCSD serves nearly half a million customers and more than
3,000 businesses within a 145-square-mile service area, which includes
unincorporated communities within central Contra Costa County. For
collection, CCCSD services approximately 344,600 customers in the
communities of Alamo, Danville, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda,
Pacheco, Pleasant Hill, San Ramon, and Walnut Creek. CCCSD also treats
wastewater for an additional 139,600 customers of the Concord/Clayton
area under a 1974 contract with the City of Concord. For treatment and
disposal, CCCSD services a total population of approximately 484,200.
In December 2008, CCCSD's District Board approved the 2008 Wastewater
Utility Service Capacity/Demand Report. This report describes the district’s
capacity for providing wastewater collection and treatment services. CCCSD
uses a capacity modeling program called InfoWorks to assess the impacts of
proposals for development in areas of known or anticipated capacity
deficiencies or current, high-maintenance facilities. The anticipated demand
is discussed in the 2017 Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan (CWWMP),
which estimates that affordable units would have an added burden of 0.46
MGD (million gallons per day), market-rate units would have an added
burden of an extra 1.01 MGD, and nonresidential uses would have an added
burden of an added 0.59 MGD. In combination with the 2017 average daily
sanitary flow (ADWF) of 33.3 MGD, the effluent discharge capacity total is
below the 53.8 MGD limit for 2022. Using this data, CCCSD concludes it can
provide adequate collection and treatment services for anticipated demand
through 2035.
CCCSD prioritizes new wastewater connections for affordable housing
(CCCSD Resolution 2008-114). An entire proposed development that has at
least one affordable housing unit will receive priority. To accurately account
for these units, CCCSD uses the RHNA developed by ABAG for lower-income
units when measuring future demand for capacity collection and treatment
services.
When shortfalls in collection system capacity are identified, CCCSD has a
combined approach to addressing them. According to its 2008 Wastewater
Utility Service Capacity/Demand Report, CCCSD requires that improvements
be made by developers, and if "too far downstream from an active project
site to be considered a direct impact of a development project," then the
district may incorporate funding for improvements of this nature in its
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). As demonstrated by the 2008 Wastewater
Utility Service Capacity/Demand Report and the 2017 CWWMP, the district
has demonstrated sufficient capacity to provide collection and treatment
services for the sites identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated
communities. There are no current or projected barriers that would limit
CCCSD’s ability to serve the sites identified in the land inventory in the
unincorporated communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from CCCSD are in the following communities: Acalanes Ridge, Alamo,
Blackhawk, Camino Tassajara, Castle Hill, Clyde, Contra Costa Centre, Diablo, La
Casa Via, Norris Canyon, North Gate, Pacheco, Pleasant Hill (unincorporated),
Reliez Valley, San Miguel, San Ramon (Unincorporated), Saranap, Shell Ridge,
Walnut Creek (Unincorporated)
6 -162 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Contra Costa Water District
Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) serves approximately 500,000
customers throughout north, central, and east Contra Costa County. CCWD
operates and maintains a complex system of water transmission, treatment,
and storage facilities to supply both treated and untreated water to its
customers. CCWD’s service area encompasses most of central and
northeastern Contra Costa County, a total area of more than 140,000 acres
(including the Los Vaqueros watershed area of approximately 19,100 acres).
Water is provided to a combination of municipal, residential, commercial,
industrial, landscape irrigation, and agricultural customers. Treated water is
distributed to individual customers living in the following communities:
Clayton, Clyde, Concord, Pacheco, Port Costa, and parts of Martinez, Pleasant
Hill, and Walnut Creek. In addition, CCWD treats and delivers water to the
City of Brentwood, Golden State Water Company (Bay Point), and the City of
Antioch. CCWD provides wholesale treated water service to the cities of
Antioch and Brentwood as well as the Golden State Water Company in Bay
Point. CCWD is also a retail provider of treated water to Clayton, Clyde,
Concord, Pacheco, Port Costa, and portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and
Walnut Creek, referred to as the Treated Water Service Area (TWSA).
CCWD does not have an accounting for the number of connections where
they provide wholesale of either treated or untreated water. However, the
TWSA has a total of approximately 61,000 connections servicing about
90,700 dwellings. Every 5 years, in accordance with the UWMP, urban water
suppliers that serve over 3,000 customers or supply 3,000 acre-feet of water
must annually prepare and adopt a water management plan. The most
recent update for CCWD was completed in 2020. The UWMP describes the
district’s capacity for providing water services. CCWD’s currently available and
planned supplies are sufficient to meet the district’s reliability goal and
estimated water demands during average, single-dry, and multiple-dry year
conditions during the next 25 years. One of the methodologies relied upon is
based on long-term planning documents, such as General Plans that have
been vetted by local and regional land use agencies. The district also relies
on the Future Water Supply Study (FWSS), which is the district’s long-term
water supply plan. The plan includes an econometric that relies on historical
data and factors that impact water use, such as population, economy, and
weather.
To address shortfalls during dry-year conditions, a combined approach of
short-term conservation programs and short-term water purchases
continues to be instituted consistent with the CCWD’s FWSS. CCWD provides
services as requested. The district provides water source and delivery to
customers within their service boundaries. Thus, CCWD only issues Intent to
Serve letters as developers approach CCWD with development projects.
There are no current or projected barriers that would limit CCWD’s ability to
serve the sites identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated
communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive both source water and delivery services
from CCWD are in the following communities: Clyde, Contra Costa Centre, North
Gate, Pacheco, Port Costa, Vine Hill, and Walnut Creek (unincorporated). Sites in
the inventory in Bay Point could receive source water from CCWD; however, in Bay
Point water is delivered by Golden State Water Company.
Crockett Community Services District
The unincorporated communities of Crockett and Port Costa, separated by
the hills of the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD), are in the northwest
corner of the county. The two communities are bound together by their
location along the Carquinez Strait. Crockett Community Services District
(CCSD) serves two communities – Crockett and Port Costa – and is
authorized to provide the following services: wastewater collection,
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -163
treatment, and disposal. CCSD uses two small wastewater treatment plants
with capacity at the Port Costa wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of 0.033
MGD and at the joint C&H Sugar-Crockett Phillip F. Meads wastewater
treatment plan (WWTP) of 1.78 MGD. Sewage effluent is collected through
81,000 lineal feet of sewer main and two pump stations in Crockett, and
7,100 lineal feet of sewer main in Port Costa. Secondary treated effluent is
disposed of into the Carquinez Strait tributary to the San Francisco Bay.
According to the most recent Sewer System Management Plan (2020), CCSD
has not had any capacity-related Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) since 2007
and has not required a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The District has
collected flow data over time and plans on using this data from existing
CCSD sanitary departments to inform the capacity analysis that is planned
for realization in the next five years from 2020. Thus, with no capacity issues
related to Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) since 2007 and plans to use flow
data to inform future capacity analysis, there are no current or projected
barriers that have not already been addressed or would limit CSD’s ability to
serve the sites identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated
communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from CCSD are in the communities of Crockett and Port Costa.
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
The Delta Diablo Sanitation District (DDSD) provides water resource recovery
(wastewater collection) services for the unincorporated community of Bay
Point and the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg. DDSD is south of the San
Joaquin River, north of an open space area that includes the Black Diamond
4 Thanh Vo, Senior Engineer, DDSD, 2021, personal communication, 2021.
Mines Regional Preserve, west of the Ironhouse Sanitary District, and east of
the CCCSD. All flows come to the pump stations before they are conveyed to
the treatment plant for treatment. According to the Contra Costa County
Water and Wastewater Agencies Combined Municipal Service Review and
Sphere of Influence Study (second round), as of 2015, DDSD operates a
WWTP with 16.5 MGD capacity, five pump stations, and a collection and
conveyance system of 71 miles of sewer pipeline.
For current wastewater collection and treatment services, DDSD has over
70,000 customers representing approximately 214,000 customers within its
service area. The DDSD Conveyance System and Master Plan Update (2010)
describes the conveyance system that is made up of 23 miles of interceptor
pipelines, pump stations, and equalization storage facilities that convey
wastewater flows from the District’s three service zones (Cities of Pittsburg
and Antioch and the community of Bay Point) to the DDSD’s WWTP.
The Conveyance System and Master Plan Update (2010) outlined
recommended projects to address deficiencies in the conveyance system
according to priority and flow checkpoints. These projects will be
implemented under the Capacity Improvement Project program as the
average dry weather flow (ADWF) is tracked to predict the timing to make the
necessary improvements.
According to Thanh Vo, Senior Engineer, DDSD has sufficient capacity to
treat wastewater from future development in Bay Point.4 Vo also noted that,
collection capacity is limited due to the conveyance infrastructure
(connection points); however, a property owner or developer can make
necessary improvements to the sewer system in the immediate area to
accommodate the additional flow. DDSD provides will-serve letters based on
6 -164 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
requirements such as Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) approval
of inclusion of the project site into the DDSD’s sphere of influence (SOI),
compliance with requirements of appropriate regulatory agencies, project
drawings and sewer studies along with related documents and paying all
necessary DDSD fees and charges. As of 2021, the district does not prioritize
connections for affordable housing.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from DDSD are in the community of Bay Point.
Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District
(TDBCSD)
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District (TDBCSD) is in the
eastern portion of the county, north of Highway 4, approximately one mile
east of the Byron Highway. The service area encompasses the developed
and developing unincorporated community of Discovery Bay of
approximately 5,760 acres. Today, Discovery Bay has evolved into a year-
round home for over 13,500 customers. TDBCSD was formed in 1998 as an
independent district pursuant to the Community Services District Act
(Government Code Section 61000 et seq.). TDBCSD is authorized to provide
water and wastewater services. TDBCSD provides a variety of services,
including water and wastewater for the community of nine square miles. The
water operations function provides potable treatment capacity of
approximately 2 MGD; storage in 4 reservoirs; and distribution through
several booster pumps and 46 miles of pipeline. TDBCSD operates six active
wells for pumping groundwater to provide for treatment. Wastewater
operations functions include two relatively small but environmentally
sensitive WWTPs with capacity of 2.1 MGD and average flow of 1.8 MGD. A
system of 15 pump stations takes collected effluent to the WWTP for
treatment and disposal.
The TDBCSD WWTP is a combination of two plants, referred to as Plant 1 and
Plant 2. All influent sewage goes to the Influent Pump Station within Plant 1,
which is then transferred to separate oxidation ditch secondary treatment
systems at Plants 1 and 2. The secondary treatment effluents from the two
plants meet in Plant 2 for further filtration, UV disinfection, and export
pumping to Old River. Biosolids handling facilities for both plants are at Plant
2 and include an aerobic digester, belt filter presses, active solar dryers, and
sludge lagoons. According to the most recent Wastewater Treatment Plant
Master Plan Update (2019), based on future land use buildout, the capacity
of Plant 2 alone will not be sufficient to sustain peak design flow and loads.
Therefore, Plant 1 will need to undergo improvements so it will be available
as a backup for Plant 2, even though it will not be operated frequently. The
2019 Master Plan describes improvements to Plant 1 that could be
implemented between 2019 and 2023. It prioritizes them from essential to
nonessential. The Master Plan states that the improvements will need to be
made, according to level of priority, as the TDBCSD determines these
improvements to Plant 1 to be cost-effective to implement. At current
capacity, the district’s hydraulic capacity for collection and treatment is
adequate for development projections. This is due to recent improvement
projects to accommodate flows greater than the ones projected for buildout
capacity conditions.
According to the Urban Water Management Plan (2021), TDBCSD relies on
groundwater to operate six facilities and service customers. The report
determines the district’s capacity to meet projected demands through
groundwater wells. This conclusion is based on the reliability analysis to
operate the 6 wells for 12 hours per day, 365 days per year. For the fiscal
year of July 2019 to June 2020, the water demand for Discovery Bay was
1,050 million gallons. The district’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan
projected water demand for 1,941 million gallons per year in 2045. The
report concludes that the existing capacity of the wells can reliably meet
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -165
current and future annual water demands based on current growth
projections. Additionally, Discovery Bay is participating in the East Contra
Costa Groundwater Sustainability Working Group to develop a Groundwater
Sustainability Plan to ensure the continued reliability of groundwater to meet
the water demands of the basin. The district also plans to implement water
storage levels so it’s able to identify and respond to water supply shortages.
There are no current or projected barriers that would limit TDBCSD’s ability
to serve the sites identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated
communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive source water, water delivery services,
wastewater collection, and wastewater treatment services from TDDBCSD are in
the community of Discovery Bay.
East Bay Municipal Utility District
The East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) supplies water and provides
wastewater treatment for parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.
EBMUD is a California special district formed under the Municipal Utility
District Act. The EBMUD water service area now includes 20 cities and 15
unincorporated East Bay communities and serves 1.4 million customers.
Water supply is received from the Mokelumne River Watershed of the Sierra
Nevada Mountains and supplied by an aqueduct to EBMUD’s system of 2
water storage reservoirs, 6 water treatment plants, and 4,100 miles of
transmission/distribution pipelines. A network of pump stations supply water
to a system of 170 neighborhood reservoirs for both untreated and treated
water service. EBMUD routes wastewater through 29 miles of interceptor
sewer pipe from seven satellite collection systems to the main WWTP in
5 EBMUD 2020, Urban Water Management Plan.
Oakland for treatment. Treated effluent is discharged more than one mile
offshore into the San Francisco Bay. A portion of the treated effluent is also
used for recycled water supply within EBMUD and other water agencies’
recycled water programs. EBMUD maintains an aggressive Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for expansion and rehabilitation of its
infrastructure with over $234 million budgeted in 2013-2014. EBMUD
provides water through their infrastructure to customers within its service
area and wastewater treatment to those customers within their smaller
wastewater treatment area. EBMUD’s water service area provides service to
approximately 1.4 million customers in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.
In addition, EBMUD’s wastewater treatment system serves approximately
740,000 customers within their wastewater service area. Every 10 years,
EBMUD performs a comprehensive demand projections study to
understand water demand and supply projections for a 30-year horizon. The
most recent update was completed in 2020. It projected demand and
required supply for 2050.
As reported in EBMUD’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the water
demand forecasting methodology relied on long-term planning documents
approved and adopted by the local and regional land use agencies.
Specifically, “Growth projections in EBMUD’s future water demand is a
reflection of planned land-use changes and redevelopment projects
forecasted by the local and regional land use agencies.”5 As demonstrated in
the Urban Water Management Plan, EBMUD shows adequate capacity to
accommodate demand through 2050 through a diversified and resilient
portfolio that includes recycled water and conservation programs. There are
6 -166 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
no current or projected barriers that would limit EBMUD’s ability to serve the
sites identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive source water and delivery services from
EBMUD are in the following communities: Acalanes Ridge, Alamo, Bayview,
Blackhawk, Camino Tassajara, Castle Hill, Crockett, Diablo, East Richmond
Heights, El Sobrante, La Casa Via, Montalvin Manor, Norris Canyon, North
Richmond, Pleasant Hill (unincorporated), Reliez Valley, Rodeo, Rollingwood, San
Miguel, San Pablo, San Ramon (Unincorporated), Saranap, Shell Ridge, Tara Hills,
and Walnut Creek (Unincorporated). Sites in the inventory in the community of
Kensington could receive source water and delivery services, as well as wastewater
treatment services from EBMUD; however, wastewater collection services in the
community of Kensington are provided by Stege Sanitary District (SSD), which is
described later in this section.
Golden State Water Company
Golden State Water Company Bay Point (GSWC Bay Point) is in northern
Contra Costa County along the south shore of the Suisun Bay. The GSWC
Bay Point service area is 3.3 square miles in the unincorporated Contra
Costa County community of Bay Point and a small part of the City of
Pittsburg. GSWC Bay Point serves the mostly unincorporated community’s
residential and commercial connections. GSWC Bay Point’s primary water
supply consists of purchased supplies from CCWD. It also has appropriative
groundwater supplies derived from the Pittsburg Plain groundwater basin,
which serve mostly as a peaking water supply and backup water source. Bay
Point also maintains an emergency connection with the City of Pittsburg that
allow it to access additional sources of water in emergency conditions. GSWC
6 Golden State Water Company, 2020, GSWC Urban Water Management Plan.
Bay Point works cooperatively with CCWD in augmenting and managing
water supplies for use in Bay Point’s service area.
GSWC Bay Point obtains its water supply from a combination of imported
water and local groundwater. As of November 2021, the agency has a total
of 5,042 municipal connections The most recent update was adopted in July
2020 with projected demand and required supply for 2045. This document
describes the district’s capacity for providing water delivery service.
According to the report, GSWC has reliable supplies to meet its retail
customer demands in normal, single-dry years, and five consecutive dry year
conditions through 2045. This is determined by GSWC’s reliable water
purchase agreement with CCWD where water supplies are not heavily
impacted and demonstrate that GSWC has enough water supply to meet
future demand for water delivery. In addition, with recent restrictions placed
on CCWD’s surface water rights, improvements by CCWD have led to more
long-term storage for drought periods and significant conservation savings.
Thus, according to the UWMP 2020 report from GSWC, “no shortage in single
dry or multiple dry year periods is expected and thus no curtailment is
anticipated to apply to wholesale customers.”6
Sites in the inventory that could receive water delivery services from GSWC are in
the community of Bay Point.
Mountain View Sanitary District
According to the Contra Costa County Water and Wastewater Agencies
Combined Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Study (second
round), as of 2015, MVSD serves approximately 18,253 customers, treating
an average daily flow of 1.25 million gallons of wastewater per day. The
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -167
MVSD service area comprises approximately 4.7 square miles and is
contiguous on all sides with the CCCSD. MVSD is an “island” within CCCSD’s
service area. MVSD operates a 2.1 MGD designed flow WWTP. The WWTP
averages 1.007 MGD as measured in 2012 as part of the district’s System
Reliability Evaluation study. MVSD’s collection system consists of 72.5 miles
of main sewer lines and 4 pump stations. Effluent disposal is accomplished
by disposal in the Peyton Slough and Moorhen Marsh area adjacent to
MVSD’s WWTP facilities.
The Fiscal Year 2021-2022 update of MVSD’s 10-year CIP describes planned
improvements, repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement of the MVSD’s plant,
collection system and pump station, and marsh assets. As noted in the
update, funding for capital improvements is expected to come from a
combination of sources, including sewer service charges, ad valorem
property tax, debt, and possibly grants. During Fiscal Year 2019-2020, the
Board adopted a three-year schedule of sewer service charge increases,
primarily to fund the CIP. The update notes that as of 2021, several
residential projects are in various stages of development, which potentially
would make significant funding contributions in the future.
According to Chris Elliott, MVSD District Engineer,7 all proposed
developments are subject to hydraulic modeling and analysis before final
district approval. He also noted that, capacity impacts precipitated by
proposed developments will be rectified by developers at their own expense.
Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, there are no known
impediments that Housing Element sites in MVDS’ district would face in
connecting to the MVSD system.
7 Chris Elliott, MVSD District Engineer, 2021, personal communication.
According to the Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review and
Sphere of Influence Study (MSR), as of 2014, Vine Hill is part of MVSD’s
sphere of influence. Vine Hill is north of the City of Martinez and west of
Interstate (I-) 680.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from MVSD are in the community of Vine Hill.
Rodeo Sanitary District
The Rodeo Sanitary District (RSD) serves the unincorporated communities of
Rodeo and Tormey adjacent to San Pablo Bay. The district provides
wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services, and contracts for
solid waste collection service for Rodeo with the Richmond Sanitary Service.
According to RSD’s website, as of 2019, RSD operates and maintains 25 miles
of pipeline with two force mains and two pump stations. The district’s Water
Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) has a design capacity of 1.14 MGD and
average dry-weather flow of 0.60 MGD. RSD, the City of Pinole, and the City
of Hercules share discharge facilities to San Pablo Bay through a Joint
Powers Agreement.
RSD provides wastewater collection and treatment services to customers
within its district boundary. According to the Contra Costa County Water and
Wastewater Agencies Combined Municipal Service Review and Sphere of
Influence Study (second round), RSD serves approximately 2,500
connections for water collection and treatment. The Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan (CWWMP), which was last updated in 2013, is an
executive report that assesses the feasibility of current facilities to provide
reliable wastewater collection and treatment, including a calculated CIP that
6 -168 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
scopes RSD’s current and future needs. In the 20 years from 2013, the
CWWMP estimates $37.2 million future wastewater-treatment improvements
and future collection-system capital improvements. The district aims to fund
these improvements through debt using Clean Water State Revolving Fund
(CWSRF) loans and traditional municipal bonds. RSD has planned for
anticipated growth through identified resources and can provide new
residences with service collection. There are no current or projected barriers
that would limit RSD’s ability to serve the sites identified in the land inventory
in the unincorporated communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from RSD are in the community of Rodeo. Additionally, one site in the
inventory in Crockett is in the RSD service area, while the other sites in Crockett
would receive wastewater collection and treatment services from CCSD, which was
described earlier in this section.
Stege Sanitary District
The Stege Sanitary District (SSD) provides sanitary sewer services to
Kensington, El Cerrito, and a portion of Richmond known as the Richmond
Annex. As of 2019, the district operates and maintains 148 miles of sanitary
sewers and two pumping stations serving over 35,000 customers residing
within the district boundaries. Wastewater treatment and disposal services
are provided by EBMUD, Special District No. 1.
SSD provides wastewater collection services throughout its district, including
12,127 residential connections and 591 commercial connections, as of 2021.
According to Paul Soo, Senior Engineer, the district has a policy to not deny
8 Paul Soo, Senior Engineer, Stege Sanitary District, December 2021, personal communication.
9 Armondo Hodge, Engineer III, West County Wastewater District (WCWD), 2021, personal communication.
any new developments of 10 or more residential dwelling units from being
built and connected to sanitary sewer services in Kensington.8 For
developments of 10 or more residential dwelling units, SSD requires
developers to perform a sanitary sewer study to prove SSD’s facilities are
adequate for the proposed development and if they are not, the developer is
responsible for constructing the needed increased capacity. SSD does not
implement policies that prioritize affordable housing connections to
wastewater and has no plans to preemptively make any capacity
improvements in Kensington. As demonstrated by the policy to service
future development in Kensington, the district has demonstrated sufficient
capacity to provide collection services for the sites identified in the land
inventory in the unincorporated communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection services from SSD
are in the community of Kensington.
West County Water District
According to Armondo Hodge, Engineer III, West County Wastewater District
(WCWD) provides wastewater collection and treatment services to
approximately 34,000 residences and 2,450 commercial and industrial
businesses, serving a total population of nearly 100,000.9 All parcels
connected to WCWD collection system are serviced. The wastewater from
serviced properties is transported and treated at the WCWD Water Quality &
Resource Recovery Plant (WQRRP) in Richmond.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -169
WCWD provides wastewater collection and treatment services for all
customers within its service boundaries. The most recent Master Plan (2014)
was created with future buildout in mind and projects planned in a timeline
coordinated with the expected buildout timelines. The Capital Portfolio
Division uses the 2014 Master Plan to inform the scope of work for their
projects (in this case, pipe repairs and/or replacements). According to the
Master Plan, the district has planned to address anticipated needs and
accommodate buildout throughout a 20-year planning period through 2034.
The growth projections indicate that flows to the WPCP will not surpass the
permitted capacity within the 20-year planning period. Through the course
of these 20 years, the district has identified necessary funding opportunities
such as low-interest loans and special incentives for recycled water projects
offered through the CWSRF.
WCWD does not prioritize connections for affordable housing, nor does the
district reserve specific wastewater capacity for lower-income housing.
WCWD provides Intent to Serve letters depending on the proposed areas of
buildout after a site analysis is conducted by WCWD's consultant. Specific
system improvements will be made as proposed in the Master Plan.
However, if system improvements are necessary before a planned capital
project can be competed, the developer is responsible for financing the
adequate upgrades. As demonstrated by the Master Plan, the district has
sufficient capacity to provide collection and treatment services for the sites
identified in the land inventory in the unincorporated communities.
Sites in the inventory that could receive wastewater collection and treatment
services from WCWD are in the communities of Bayview, East Richmond Heights,
El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, North Richmond, Rollingwood, San Pablo and
Tara Hills.
3. Progress Toward RHNA
The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) was prepared by ABAG for
the period of June 30, 2022, through December 15, 2030. As part of this
process, ABAG requires each jurisdiction to plan for a certain number of
housing units for this period. This requirement is satisfied by identifying
adequate sites that could accommodate housing affordable to very low-,
low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income households. ABAG has
determined that the unincorporated county’s share of regional housing
needs is 7,610 new housing units. Table 6-55 shows that the County has
enough units identified to address and exceed the RHNA.
TABLE 6-55 REMAINING RHNA BY INCOME GROUP
Income
Group RHNA
Approved
Projects
(as of
November
2022)
[Table 6-50]
Remaining
RHNA
Projected
ADUs
Potential
Units on
Vacant/
Under-
utilized
Sites
Surplus
Very Low 2,072 107 3,159 164 5,380 2,549 Low 1,194 164
Moderate 1,211 70 1,141 164 1,767 790
Above
Moderate 3,133 1,855 1,278 54 2,369 1,145
Total 7,610 2,032 5,578 546 9,516
Source: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 2022
6 -170 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
B. FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Contra Costa County has access to existing and potential funding sources for
affordable housing activities. These include programs from federal, state,
local, and private resources. The following section describes the key housing
funding sources currently used in the county: Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Act Funds (HOME),
Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC), Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS (HOPWA), as well as tax-exempt bond financing, tax credits, and
Section 8. Table 6-56 provides a complete inventory of the key financial
resources available for housing in the County’s unincorporated areas..
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -171
TABLE 6-56 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FOR HOUSING ACTIVITIES
Program Name Description Eligible Activities
1. Federal Programs
Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG)
Annual grants awarded to the County on a formula basis for housing and
community development activities in the Urban County.
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• Homebuyer Assistance
• Economic Development
• Infrastructure Improvements
• Homeless Assistance
• Public Services
HOME Investment Partnership
Act Funds (HOME)
Flexible grant program awarded to County on a formula basis for affordable
housing activities in the Contra Costa Consortium area.
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• Homebuyer Assistance
• New Construction
Emergency Shelter Grants
Competitive grants awarded to County for use by County and nonprofits to
implement a broad range of activities and housing that serve homeless
persons in Urban County.
• Shelter Construction
• Shelter Operation
• Social Services
• Homeless Prevention and
assistance
Housing Opportunities for
Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
Funds for housing development and related support services for low-income
persons with HIV/AIDS and their families.
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• New Construction
• Housing-related Services
Housing Choice Voucher Program
(Section 8)
Direct rental assistance payments to owners of private market rate units on
behalf of very low-income tenants. • Rental Assistance
Section 108 Loan
Provides loan guarantee to CDBG entitlement jurisdictions for large-scale
projects. Maximum loan amount can be up to five times the jurisdiction’s
recent annual allocation.
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• Homebuyer Assistance
• Economic Development
• Homeless Assistance
• Public Services
Mortgage Credit Certificate
Program
Income tax credits available to first-time homebuyers to buy new or existing
single-family housing. Local agencies (County) make certificates available. • Homebuyer Assistance
Low-income Housing Tax Credit
(LIHTC)
Annual tax credits that help owners of rental units develop affordable
housing.
• New Construction
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• Historic Preservation
Capital Funds Financing Program
(CFFP)
Funds are available to public housing authority for public housing
modernization and rehabilitation.
• Rehabilitation
• Modernization
Supportive Housing Program
(SHP)
Grants for development of supportive housing and support services to assist
homeless persons in the transition from homelessness.
• Transitional Housing
• Housing for the Disabled
• Supportive Housing
• Support Services
Continuum of Care/Homeless
Emergency Assistance and Rapid
Transition to Housing (HEARTH)
Funding through the HEARTH Act of 2009 to provide necessary resources for
development of programs to assist homeless individuals and families. • Homeless Assistance • New Construction
6 -172 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Program Name Description Eligible Activities
Section 811
Grants to nonprofit developers of supportive housing for persons with
disabilities, including group homes, independent living facilities, and
intermediate care facilities.
• Acquisition
• New Construction
• Rehabilitation
• Rental Assistance
2. State Programs
Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities To encourage and support sustainable communities pursuant to SB 375. • Construction, rehabilitation,
or acquisition
• Development or
preservation of affordable
housing
CalHome Grants awarded to jurisdictions for owner-occupied housing rehabilitation
and first-time home buyer assistance.
• Predevelopment, site
acquisition, and
development
• Acquisition and
rehabilitation of site-built
housing
• Rehabilitation and repair of
manufactured housing
• Down payment assistance,
mortgage financing,
homebuyer counseling, and
technical assistance for self-
help projects
Infill Infrastructure Grant Program Assist in the new construction and rehabilitation of infrastructure that
supports higher-density affordable housing.
• New construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of
infrastructure
California Housing Finance
Agency (CalHFA) Rental Housing
Programs
Below-market rate financing offered to builders and developers of multiple-
family and elderly rental housing. Tax-exempt bonds provide below-market
mortgages. Funds may also be used to acquire properties.
• New construction
• Rehabilitation • Acquisition
California Housing Finance
Agency (CalHFA) Home Mortgage
Purchase Program
CalHFA sells tax-exempt bonds to make below market loans to first-time
homebuyers. Program operates through participating lenders who originate
loans for CalHFA.
• Homebuyer Assistance
Local Housing Trust Fund
Matching Grant Program
Provides matching grants to local housing trust funds that are funded on an
ongoing basis from private contributions or public sources that are not
otherwise restricted in use for housing programs.
• New Construction • Homebuyer Assistance
Single-Family Housing Bond
Program (Mortgage Revenue
Bonds)
Bonds issued to local lenders and developers so that below market-interest
rate loans can be issued to first-time homebuyers. • Homebuyer Assistance
Prop 63 Mental Health Services
Act Funds
Funding for capital improvements and operating subsidies for supportive
housing for formerly homeless or at-risk individuals with mental disabilities. • Special-Needs Programs • New Construction
Affordable Housing Partnership
Program (AHPP)
Provides lower-interest-rate CHFA loans to home buyers who receive local
secondary financing. • Homebuyer Assistance
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -173
Program Name Description Eligible Activities
Permanent Local Housing
Allocation (PLHA)
PLHA provides a permanent source of funding for all local governments in
California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the
affordable housing stock. The two types of assistance are: formula grants to
entitlement and non-entitlement jurisdictions, and competitive grants to
non-entitlement jurisdictions.
• Predevelopment
• Development
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation
• Preservation
• Matching Funds
• Homelessness Assistance
• Accessibility Modifications
• Homeownership Assistance
• Fiscal Incentives
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP)
Grants
The Local Early Action Planning Grants (LEAP) provide over-the-counter
grants complemented with technical assistance to local governments for the
preparation and adoption of planning documents, and process
improvements that accelerates housing production.
Facilitate compliance to implement the sixth-cycle Regional Housing Needs
Assessment.
• Housing Element Updates
• Updates to Zoning, Plans or
Procedures to Increase or
Accelerate Housing
Production
• Pre-Approved Architectural
and Site Plans
• Establishing State-Defined
Pro-Housing Policies
• See Complete List in
Program Materials
SB 2 Technical Assistance Grants
Financial and technical assistance to local governments to update planning
documents and the Development Code to streamline housing production,
including but not limited to general plans, community plans, specific plans,
implementation of sustainable communities’ strategies, and local coastal
programs.
• Technical Assistance • Planning Document
Updates
Housing and Disability Advocacy
Program (HDAP)
Services to assist disabled individuals who are experiencing homelessness
apply for disability benefit programs while also providing housing assistance.
HDAP has four core requirements: outreach, case management, disability
advocacy, and housing assistance.
• Rental Assistance
No Place Like Home
Loans to counties or developers in counties for permanent supportive
housing for those with mental illness who are homeless or at risk of
homelessness.
• New Construction
Homeless Emergency Aid
Program (HEAP)
A block grant program designed to provide direct assistance to cities,
counties, and Continuums of Care to address the homelessness crisis
throughout California.
• Identified Homelessness
Needs
• Capital Improvements
Related to Homelessness
• Rental Assistance
California Emergency Solutions
and Housing (CESH)
Provides funds for activities to assist persons experiencing or at risk of
homelessness. Program funds are granted in the form of five-year grants to
eligible applicants.
• Homelessness Service
System Administration
• New Construction
• Rental Assistance
6 -174 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Program Name Description Eligible Activities
3. Local Programs
Single-Family Mortgage Revenue
Bond
Issue mortgage revenue bonds to support the development and
improvement of affordable single-family homes to qualified households.
• New Construction
• Rehabilitation • Acquisition
Tax Exempt Housing Revenue
Bond
Support low-income housing development by issuing housing tax-exempt
bonds requiring the developer to lease a fixed percentage of the units to
low-income families at specified rental rates.
• New Construction
• Rehabilitation • Acquisition
Measure X Local Housing Fund
Measure X is a dedicated source of revenue to fund the building of
permanent housing for people earning less than 50% of the Area Median
Income. Provides complementary ongoing funding for supportive services
and homelessness prevention to support and maintain housing.
• Predevelopment
• New Construction, Acquisition, Rehabilitation, Dedicated
Homelessness Prevention, Supportive Services
Housing Successor (Former
Redevelopment Low-Moderate
Income Housing Fund)
The County is the Housing Successor to the former Redevelopment Agency.
The Housing Successor has land assets in Bay Point, Rodeo and North
Richmond that are available for affordable housing development. The
Housing Successor has limited funds available to assist in the development
of those housing properties.
• New Construction
4. Private Resources/Financing Programs
Federal National Mortgage
Association (Fannie Mae)
Fixed rate mortgages issued by private mortgage insurers. • Homebuyer Assistance
Mortgages which fund the purchase and rehabilitation of a home.
• Homebuyer Assistance • Rehabilitation Low down-payment mortgages for single-family homes in underserved low-
income and minority cities.
Freddie Mac Home Works
Provides first and second mortgages that include rehabilitation loan. County
provides gap financing for rehabilitation component. Households earning up
to 80 percent Median Family Income qualify.
• Homebuyer Assistance
California Community
Reinvestment Corporation (CCRC)
Nonprofit mortgage banking consortium designed to provide long term debt
financing for affordable rental housing. Nonprofit and for-profit developers
contact member banks.
• New Construction
• Rehabilitation • Acquisition
Federal Home Loan Bank
Affordable Housing Program
Loans (and some grants) to public agencies and private entities for a wide
variety of housing projects and programs. Participation is by FHLB
participating lenders.
• New Construction
• Homebuyer Assistance
• Rehabilitation
• Housing Supportive Services
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -175
Program Name Description Eligible Activities
Community Vision Offers low-interest loans for the revitalization of low-income communities
and affordable housing development.
• Acquisition
• Pre-Development • New Construction
Bay Area Local Initiatives Support
Corporation (LISC)
Bay Area LISC provides recoverable grants and debt financing on favorable
terms to support a variety of community development activities, including
affordable housing.
• Acquisition • New Construction
Low-Income Investment Fund
(LIIF)
LIIF provides loan financing for all phases of affordable housing development
and/or rehabilitation.
• Acquisition
• Rehabilitation • New Construction
1. Community Development Block Grant
Program Funds
Through the CDBG program, the federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) provides funds to local governments for funding a wide
range of housing and community development activities for low-income
persons.
The County administers the CDBG Program for all Contra Costa jurisdictions
except the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. These
four cities have populations over 50,000 and are entitled to receive funding
from HUD directly. The remaining 15 cities and the unincorporated areas
participate in the CDBG program through the County, and are collectively
referred to as the Contra Costa Urban County.
Based on previous allocations, the County anticipates receiving an annual
allocation of approximately $4.5 million annually in CDBG funds during the
2023-2031 planning period. In accordance with policies established by the
Board of Supervisors, 45 percent of the annual CDBG allocation
(approximately $2.02 million) is reserved for programs and projects to
increase and maintain the supply of affordable housing in the Urban County.
Program priorities include projects to:
• increase the supply of multifamily rental housing affordable to and
occupied by very low- and low-income households;
• maintain the existing affordable housing stock through the
rehabilitation of owner-occupied and rental housing;
• increase the supply of appropriate and supportive housing for special
needs populations;
• assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless by
providing emergency and transitional housing; and
• alleviate problems of housing discrimination.
CDBG funds are used for site acquisition, rehabilitation, first-time
homebuyer assistance, development of emergency and transitional shelters,
and fair housing/housing counseling activities. Additional activities in support
of the new construction of affordable housing include site acquisition, site
clearance, and the financing of related infrastructure and public facility
improvements.
6 -176 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
2. HOME Investment Partnership Act
Program Funds
The purpose of the HOME Program is to improve and/or expand the supply
of affordable housing opportunities for low-income households. Contra
Costa as the Urban County and the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg and
Walnut Creek formed the Contra Costa Consortium for purposes of
participating in the HOME Program. The County administers the program on
behalf of the Consortium.
Approximately $3.6 million in HOME funds are allocated to the Consortium
on an annual basis through HUD.
Consortium HOME Program priorities include the following:
• acquisition, rehabilitation and new construction of affordable
multifamily rental housing;
• owner-occupied housing rehabilitation programs for low-income
households;
• first-time homebuyer’s assistance for low-income households.
All projects funded with HOME funds must be targeted to very low and low-
income households and must have permanent matching funds from non-
federal resources equal to 25 percent of the requested funds. In addition,
the Board of Supervisors has established a priority for the allocation of
HOME and CDBG funds to projects that include a portion of the units
affordable to extremely low-income households.
3. Housing Opportunities for Persons
with AIDS (HOPWA)
The Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) program
provides funding for housing development and related support services for
low-income persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. Funds are provided
through HUD on an annual basis to the City of Oakland for the
Alameda/Contra Costa eligible metropolitan area. Contra Costa County
receives a formula share of HOPWA funds from the City of Oakland based on
the number of reported AIDS cases. Contra Costa’s share is approximately
25 percent of the total allocation, or approximately $900,000. Funds had
been used primarily for acquisition/rehabilitation, and new construction of
permanent housing. Additional funds have been used by the County AIDS
Program for housing advocacy. CCHS will be managing this program goind
forward. Future allocations will be used for HIV/AIDS services rather than
housing development.
4. Mental Health Services Act
The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) was established by the passage of
Proposition 63 in November 2004 as is intended to “transform the public
mental health system”. The population to be helped under MHSA is defined
as adults and older adults who have been diagnosed with or who may have a
serious and persistent mental illness, and children and youth who have been
diagnosed with or who may have serious emotional disorders, and their
families. In 2008, the County assigned its MHSA housing funds to the
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) to administer on behalf of the
County.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -177
Until 2016, the County participated in a specially legislated state-run MHSA
Housing Program through CalHFA. In collaboration with many community
partners, the County embarked on several one-time capitalization projects to
create 56 permanent housing units for individuals with serious mental
illness. The individuals housed in these units receive their mental health
support from CCBHS contract and county service providers. The sites include
Villa Vasconcellos in Walnut Creek, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza in North Richmond,
The Virginia Street Apartments in Richmond, Tabora Gardens in Antioch,
Robin Lane apartments in Concord, Ohlone Garden apartments in El Cerrito,
Third Avenue Apartments in Walnut Creek, Garden Park apartments in
Concord, and scattered units throughout the County operated by Hope
Solutions (formerly Contra Costa Interfaith Housing).
The state-run MHSA Housing Program ended in 2016 and was replaced by
the Special Needs Housing Program (SNHP). Under SNHP, the County
received and distributed $1.73 million in state level MHSA funds to preserve,
acquire or rehabilitate housing units, and added 5 additional units of
permanent supportive housing at the St. Paul Commons housing
development in Walnut Creek. Effective January 3, 2020, CalHFA discontinued
SNHP. The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) notified county
mental health plans that the deadline to use SNHP funds was June 30, 2023.
4. No Place Like Home
Although discontinued, the SNHP was intended to be a bridge between the
MHSA Housing Program and the No Place Like Home (NPLH) Program. The
NPLH Program was enacted on July 1, 2016 (via Assembly Bill 1618) to invest
in the development of permanent supportive housing for persons who need
mental health services and are experiencing homelessness or are at risk of
chronic homelessness. Since the inception of the NPLH Program, Contra
Costa County has applied for both the competitive and non-competitive
portions in all four rounds of the NPLH Program.
Round 1 - Contra Costa was awarded competitive funding in partnership
with Satellite Affordable Housing Association (SAHA) in the amount of
$1,804,920 for construction of 10 dedicated NPLH units for persons with
serious mental illness at their Veteran’s Square Project in the East region of
the County.
Round 2 - Contra Costa was awarded funds to construct permanent
supportive housing units in the Central and West regions of the County. An
award was granted to Resources for Community Development (RCD) in the
amount of $6,000,163 for 13 NPLH Units at their Galindo Terrace
development. In 2020, CCBHS received a non-competitive allocation amount
of $2,231,574 which was awarded to RCD for a combination project (use of
both competitive and non-competitive funds) for a total amount of NPLH
financing in the amount of $14,456,028.
Round 3 – 8 units located at 699 Ygnacio Valley Rd in Walnut Creek via non-
competitive funds.
Round 4 – CCBHS submitted two competitive applications. If awarded, the
first would result in 21 units located in Walnut Creek in partnership with
RCD. The second application would result in 8 units located in Richmond in
partnership with Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC).
6 -178 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
5. Housing Successor (former
Redevelopment Set-Aside) Funds
The legislation eliminating redevelopment allowed housing assets to remain
with the County. There is approximately $$8.3 million in housing funds which
will be used in the former redevelopment areas. Housing developed with
these funds must remain affordable to low- and moderate-income
households for at least 55 years for rentals and 45 years for ownership
housing. In addition, the Housing Successor has several vacant housing
sites available for development of affordable housing in Bay Point, Rodeo,
and North Richmond.
6. Bond Financing
The County has been very active in issuing tax-exempt mortgage revenue
bonds to support the development of affordable housing. Under the
Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) Program, the County provides mortgage
financing for affordable housing projects through the sale of tax-exempt
bonds. In particular, the Multi-family Residential Rental Housing Revenue
Bond Program assists developers of multi-family rental housing in increasing
the supply of affordable rental units available to qualified households. The
proceeds from bond sales are used for new construction, acquisition, and/or
rehabilitation of multi-family housing developments. A specified number of
units are required to remain affordable to eligible, lower-income households
for a specified number of years after the initial financing is provided.
Numerous County affordable housing developments have been funded in
part by proceeds from County-issued bonds, including Heritage Point in
North Richmond,. Through the refinancing of bonds, the County has also
extended the affordability terms on assisted housing projects.
7. Mortgage Credit Certificates
The Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, authorized by Congress in the Tax
Reform Act of 1984, provides financial assistance to "First-time homebuyers"
to purchase new or existing single-family homes. In 1985, the State adopted
legislation authorizing local agencies, such as Contra Costa County, to make
Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCCs) available in California. Contra Costa
County MCC authority can be used in all cities as well as the unincorporated
areas of the County. As of 2019, the State, through CalHFA, has not
provided additional funding to counties for the MCC Program; therefore,
Contra Costa County currently does not have any additional funds to provide
mortgage credit certificates to new first-time homebuyers in Contra Costa
County. CalHFA has not officially discontinued the MCC Program and may
provide funds again in the future.
8. Low Income Housing Tax Credits
(LIHTC)
Created by the 1986 Tax Reform Act, the LIHTC program has been used in
combination with County and other resources to encourage the construction
and rehabilitation of rental housing for lower-income households. The
program allows investors an annual tax credit over a ten-year period,
provided that the housing meets minimum low-income occupancy
requirements. The tax credit is typically sold to large investors at a
syndication value. Several County affordable apartment projects have been
funded in part by LIHTC proceeds.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -179
9. Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8)
Assistance
The Housing Authority of Contra Costa County administers the federal rental
assistance program that provides rent subsidies to very-low income persons
in need of affordable housing. The Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8)
program offers a voucher that pays the difference between the current fair
market rent and what a tenant can afford to pay (e.g., 30 percent of their
income). The voucher allows a tenant to choose housing that may cost above
the payment standard, but the tenant must pay the extra cost. Project-based
vouchers help support new affordable housing developments. The County
currently has approximately 8,640 households with various programs under
the umbrella of the Housing Choice Voucher Program.
C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCES
1. Contra Costa County Department of
Conservation and Development
The Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) maintains overall
responsibility for the development of housing and community development
plans, policies and strategies, including the County Housing Element and the
Consolidated Plan. DCD implements programs designed to increase and
maintain affordable housing, expand economic and social opportunities for
lower income, homeless and special needs populations, and revitalize
declining neighborhoods. Specific programs include the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnership Act
Program, the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
Program, the tax-exempt and mortgage revenue bond, and Mortgage Credit
Certificate (MCC) programs. DCD is also responsible for the review of
projects applying to HUD for funding to determine their consistency with the
Consortium’s Consolidated Plan.
DCD also carries out building inspection and code enforcement activities
that are designed to ensure the safety of the County’s housing stock. DCD
operates the Neighborhood Preservation Program, a housing rehabilitation
loan program for low-income homeowners in the Urban County. In addition,
DCD offers a weatherization and energy conservation program. This
program helps lower income households to reduce monthly housing costs
through the provision of resources for rehabilitation and other
improvements designed to increase efficiency in energy use.
2. Contra Costa County Health Services
Department
The Health Services Department (HSD) is responsible for the development of
plans and programs to assist homeless households and adults throughout
the County by providing emergency and permanent supportive housing and
supportive services designed to enable this population to achieve greater
economic independence and a stable living environment. HSD coordinates
the activities of and provides staff support to the Contra Costa Interagency
Council on Homelessness (CCICH), appointed by the County Board of
Supervisors and consisting of representatives of local jurisdictions, homeless
service providers, advocacy and volunteer groups, the business and faith
communities, citizens at large, and previously/currently homeless individuals.
The CCICH works with the HSD to develop and refine the Ten Year Plan to
End Homelessness, and to develop the County’s annual Homeless
6 -180 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act
application, educate the public with respect to homeless issues, and
advocate for increased funding for homeless programs.
D. LOCAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING
DEVELOPER CAPACITY
Contra Costa County has several successful affordable housing developers
with significant organizational capacity. Nonprofit agencies that are involved
in housing development represent a substantial resource for the provision of
affordable units in a community. These agencies/organizations play
important roles in the production, improvement, preservation, and
management of affordable housing. Nonprofit ownership helps assure that
these housing units will remain as low-income housing. Following is an
example of the most active housing non-profits and developers in the
County.
1. BRIDGE Housing Corporation
Located in San Francisco, BRIDGE Housing Corporation develops and
manages affordable housing for lower income households in the Bay Area
and throughout California. Projects developed and managed by BRIDGE in
Contra Costa County include affordable multifamily rental housing (e.g.
Coggins Square Apartments, Grayson Creek) and rental housing for seniors
(Pinole Grove, The Arbors).
2. Christian Church Homes
Christian Church Homes of Northern California (CCHNC), located in Oakland,
was created to meet the housing needs of low-income seniors. The agency
currently manages Sycamore Place I & II Apartments, Antioch Hillcrest
Terrace and Carquinez Vista Manor.
3. Community Housing Development
Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC)
CHDC is a nonprofit housing developer located in North Richmond that has
been active in the development of affordable homeownership opportunities
and multi-family rental housing in the West County area. Successfully
completed projects include Parkway Estates and the Community Heritage
Apartments.
4. Eden Housing, Inc.
Based in Hayward, Eden Housing assists communities through an array of
affordable housing development and management activities as well as social
services that meet the needs of lower income households. The agency
serves low- and moderate-income families, seniors, disabled households and
the formerly homeless. Projects include Brentwood Senior Commons, Belle
Terre, Orinda Senior, Riverhouse, Rivertown Place, Samara Terrace, Victoria
Family, Virginia Lane, and West Rivertown. An additional project in El Cerrito
is in predevelopment.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -181
5. EAH
EAH is a non-profit housing developer active throughout California. EAH
develops and manages affordable housing projects in order to expand the
supply of high quality affordable housing and to enable families to attain
financial stability. The agency has completed a number of affordable
developments in the County including The Oaks, Golden Oak Manor, Silver
Oak, Casa Adobe, and Rodeo Gateway Apartments. EAH is also the
developer of the proposed Phase 2 Senior Apratment project in Rodeo.
6. Mercy Housing California
Mercy Housing California is a nonprofit housing developer located in San
Francisco and Sacramento that has been active in Contra Costa County
developing homeownership and rental housing projects. Target populations
include senior and farm worker families. Projects include Arroyo Seco, Marsh
Creek Vista, Villa Amador, a multi-family rental housing project for low-
income farmworker-households in East County. Mercy Housing, in
partnership with Contra Costa Interfaith Housing, developed a permanent
supportive housing project for homeless families called Garden Park.
7. Habitat for Humanity, East Bay/Silicon
Valley
Habitat for Humanity is a nonprofit agency dedicated to building affordable
housing and rehabilitating homes to provide affordable homeownership
opportunities for lower income families. Habitat builds and repairs homes
with the help of public funds, private donations, volunteers and partner
families. Habitat homes are sold to partner families at no profit with
affordable, no-interest loans. Volunteers, churches, businesses, and other
groups provide most of the labor for the homes. Habitat developed Ellis
Street Townhomes, El Rincon, Herb White Way, Norcross, Montague and
Rivertown homes. Additional projects in unincorporated Martinez (Muir
Ridge) has been constructed and Bay Point (Pacifica Landing) has
entitlements and building permits are pending.
8. Resources for Community
Development (RCD)
Resources for Community Development (RCD) is a nonprofit housing
developer located in Berkeley and active throughout Alameda and Contra
Costa County. RCD develops housing for individuals, families, and special
needs populations through acquisition/rehabilitation and new construction
projects. Contra Costa projects include Terrace Glen, Aspen Court, Riley
Court, Camara Circle, Bella Vista, Pinecrest Apartments, Caldera Place,
Alvarez Court, Lakeside, Los Medanos, Villa Vasconcellos, and Berrellesa
Palms. An additional project, Ohlone Gardens, is under construction.
9. SHELTER, Inc. of Contra Costa County
SHELTER, Inc. is a nonprofit community-based service organization and
affordable housing provider located in Martinez that is active in Central and
East Contra Costa County. SHELTER, Inc. provides homeless prevention
services as well as transitional and special needs housing. Projects and
programs include REACH Plus, Lyle Morris Center, Mt. View House, The
Landings, and Victoria Apartments.
6 -182 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
10. Satellite Affordable Housing Associates
Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA) is a nonprofit housing
developer located in Berkeley and active throughout Alameda and Contra
Costa County. SAHA develops housing for families, seniors, and special
needs populations through acquisition/rehabilitation and new construction
projects. Contra Costa projects include Acalanes Court, Hookston Manor,
Montego Place, and Sierra Gardens. An additional project, Third Avenue
Apartments, is under construction.
11. Richmond Land
Richmond LAND builds community capacity and grassroots power for a just
transition by engaging Richmond residents in the advocacy, planning, and
control of community-centered economic development projects and policies
that repair the impacts of structural racism in housing and development.
E. OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY
CONSERVATION AND REDUCING
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Utility-related costs can directly impact the affordability of housing in Contra
Costa County. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations contains
California’s building standards for energy efficiency and is designed to
reduce wasteful and unnecessary energy consumption in newly constructed
and existing buildings. The California Energy Commission updates the
Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Parts 6 and 11) every three
years by working with stakeholder in a public and transparent process.
These regulations set forth mandatory energy standards for new
development and requires adoption of an “energy budget.” In turn, the
home building industry must comply with these standards while localities are
responsible for enforcing the energy conservation regulations. Buildings
designed and constructed to optimize energy efficiency can result in lower
energy costs to homeowners and renters.
There are many alternative ways to meet these energy standards including
but not limited to:
• installation of rooftop solar energy systems,
• use of passive solar,
• high insulation levels,
• active solar water heating,
• locating the home on the northern portion of the sunniest location of
the site,
• designing the structure to admit the maximum amount of sunlight into
the building and to reduce exposure to extreme weather conditions,
• locating indoor areas of maximum usage along the south face of the
building and placing corridors, closets, laundry rooms, power core, and
garages along the north face making the main entrance a small,
enclosed space that creates an air lock between the building and its
exterior,
• orienting the entrance away from winds, or
• using a windbreak to reduce the wind velocity against the entrance.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -183
1. Utility Incentive Programs
Utility companies serving Contra Costa County offer various programs to
promote the efficient use of energy and other resources, and to assist lower
income customers. These programs are discussed below.
MCE is the default electricity provider to residential customers within the
unincorporated county and offers a variety of programs to help residential
customers reduce their energy costs.
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) provides natural gas to residential consumers in
the county and electricity to residential customers that have opted out of
MCE’s services. PG&E provides a variety of energy efficiency rebates and
energy conservation services for residents.
PG&E, MCE and Bay REN each offer several energy assistance programs for
lower income households, which help qualified homeowners and renters
conserve energy and control electricity costs. These programs are modified
periodically and the County works with these providers to help County
residents enroll. In addition, the State Department of Health and Human
Services funds the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Block Grant. Under this program, eligible low-income persons, via local
governmental and nonprofit organizations, can receive financial assistance
to offset the costs of heating and/or cooling dwellings and/or to have their
dwellings weatherized to make them more energy efficient.
As energy is used in the treatment and transportation of water, water use
efficiency translates to energy efficiency. CCWD delivers treated and
untreated water to residential consumers in central and eastern Contra
Costa County. The CCWD offers rebates and incentives to its customers for
efficiency in home water use.
The East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), which also serves residents
of Contra Costa County, offers many conservation services and incentives to
its customers. To start, EBMUD offers complimentary on-site surveys of
indoor and outdoor water use to its users, as well as conservation devices—
including low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators.EBMUD offers rebates
for water-efficient home landscaping and WaterSmart Garden Grants for
public garden water conservation projects.
The County is also served by other smaller water service providers.
2. The County’s Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory
Contra Costa County completed its most recent greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions inventory for 2019. The inventory found that approximately 19
percent of the County’s GHG emissions came from residential energy use.
Focusing on the County’s unincorporated area, residential energy use
represents 19 percent of total GHG emissions. While the County has already
implemented energy efficiency and other GHG reduction programs, multiple
opportunities to expand these programs and implement new programs
remain.
6 -184 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
3. The County’s Efforts to Promote
Energy Efficiency and Reduce GHG
Emissions
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors formed the Climate Change
Working Group in May 2005. The CCWG was comprised of the Agricultural
Commissioner, the Director of General Services, the Director of Health
Services, the Director of Public Works, the Director of the Department of
Conservation and Development and the Deputy Directory for Building
Inspection.
In December 2008, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Municipal Climate
Action Plan (the “2008 Plan”), which established formal GHG reduction
targets, GHG reduction measures, and methods for analysis and monitoring
of GHG reduction measures for the County’s government operations
emissions. The County conducted an interim GHG inventory in 2013 in order
to direct priorities toward achieving a target of reducing government
operations GHG emissions 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.
On December 15, 2015, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Climate Action
Plan (the “2015 CAP”) to reduce community-wide GHG emissions in the
unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. The 2015 CAP included
sections covering the scientific and regularly environment, an updated GHG
inventory and forecast, a GHG reduction strategy for community-wide
emissions, and implementation plan.
The County is currently preparing the 2022 Climate Action Plan Update to
build on the legacy of these prior efforts by including an updated estimate of
the County’s energy use and GHG emissions, updated emissions reductions
and implementation and monitoring strategies, and a discussion of climate
change impacts relevant to Contra Costa County. The 2022 CAP will identify
energy efficiency and conservation and GHG reduction strategies that
benefit residents through and beyond 2050, consistent with the State’s goals
and programs to achieve statewide net carbon neutrality and carbon free
energy by 2045.
The County has already implemented many measures that have reduced its
municipal GHG emissions. Some of the most effective municipal GHG
reduction measures include compressed employee work weeks and remote
work schedules, building lighting retrofits, building heating-ventilating-air
conditioning (HVAC) improvements, direct digital control devices for building
HVAC systems, installation of cogeneration plants for buildings that operate
24 hours per day, purchase of energy efficient computers and copiers, paper
recycling, use of B20 biodiesel fuel for the County diesel fleet, purchase of
hybrid vehicles for the County fleet, and the use of LEDs in traffic signals. The
County is in the process of installing electric vehicle charging stations to
facilitate a conversion of the County’s fleet to zero-emission. The County’s
efforts to reduce municipal GHG emissions will continue to expand with the
development and implementation of the 2022 Climate Action Plan.
The County has also implemented various community-wide measures that
have targeted residential energy conservation or otherwise reduced GHG
emissions. Some of the residential energy conservation measures include:
• offer density bonuses for development projects that include a specified
number of affordable housing units,
• encourage mixed use development to limit travel distances,
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -185
• conduct a weatherization program to assist low- or fixed-income
households in making their homes more energy efficient,
• actively participate and coordinate in regional and local energy
efficiency incentive programs funded by the State through local utility
providers and other energy efficiency implementors,
• adopt and encourage use of Green Building Guidelines for residential
construction and remodeling projects
• Implement County’s all-electric ordinance
• provide green building related information to the public (including
custom-made green building materials display and free copies of
above-mentioned Guidelines),
• require developers to provide information on commute alternatives
available to their residents,
• require certain new developments to use drought-tolerant
landscaping,
• require certain development projects to construct bicycle and
pedestrian amenities, and
• require large development projects in designated transit areas to
install features to support mass transit.
Other community-wide GHG reduction measures include efforts to adopt
residential variable can rate structures to promote waste reduction and
recycling, inform residents regarding the proper methods to manage their
unwanted household chemicals and electronics, use methane from landfills
to generate electricity, and recognize businesses that adopt green business
practices.
Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE): To encourage more retrofitting of
existing residences, the County developed a process to allow Property
Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing providers to operate within
unincorporated Contra Costa County. PACE financing allows individual
property owners to voluntarily join an assessment district and borrow money
(up to 100% of the project cost) for the purpose of making energy or water
efficiency improvement to their property. This unique financing mechanism
is tied to the property, rather than the individual, and eligibility is based
primarily on property value and equity. The property assessment is paid
back over time (usually over a 5 to 20 year term) on the property owner’s
property tax bill. The voluntary assessment is created when the property
owner enters into a contract, known as a “contractual assessment,” with a
PACE financing provider. Currently, four (4) PACE financing providers are
authorized to operate in unincorporated Contra Costa County. PACE
financing also creates jobs, promotes economic development, and helps
protect the environment.
The Weatherization Program provides free weatherization services to improve
the energy efficiency of homes, including attic insulation, weather-stripping,
minor home repairs, and related energy conservation measures.
The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) provides financial assistance to
eligible households to offset the costs of heating and/or cooling dwellings.
The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP) provides payments for weather-
related or energy-related emergencies.
6 -186 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
4. Regional Opportunities to Further
Reduce Energy Use and GHG
Emissions
Many residential energy conservation opportunities are closely inter-related
with other regulations/standards currently being developed and adopted at
the regional and state levels.
In July 2012, the County joined the Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN), a collaborative partnership among the nine-county San Francisco
Bay Area led by ABAG. BayREN implements effective energy saving programs
on a regional level and draws on the expertise, experience, and proven track
record of Bay Area local governments to develop and administer successful
climate, resource, and sustainability programs. The program is funded by
California utility ratepayers under the auspices of the California Public
Utilities Commission. The program offers free technical services and
financial incentives (rebates) to both Single-Family and Multi-Family units. To
receive the most updated information regarding current programs, visit the
BayREN website (www.bayren.org).
5. Local Opportunities to Further Reduce
Energy Use and GHG Emissions
The County also has many opportunities to expand its existing efforts toward
community-wide GHG reduction, including further reductions in residential
energy use.As a starting point, the County will expand efforts to promote:
• Infill and transit-oriented development,
• Water- and energy-saving incentives/rebates offered to households,
• Use of water-efficient landscaping and energy efficient irrigation
systems,
• Use of photovoltaic systems,
• Reduced reliance on private vehicles,
• Use of permeable paving materials for cooling and water conservation,
• Promote Location Efficient Mortgage and Energy Efficient Mortgage
programs as available, and
• Seek or support applications for affordable housing funds from
agencies that reward and offer incentives for affordable infill housing
and affordable housing built close to jobs, transportation, and
amenities (e.g., HCD’s Multifamily Housing Program and California Tax
Credit Allocation Committee).
As resources are available, the County will initiate process to review existing
policies, standards or requirements in our County Code and General Plan to
identify those that:
• Help reduce energy use from residential buildings and assess potential
for expanding or enhancing them, and
• Serve as potential barriers to incorporating residential energy efficiency
incentives or requirements and assess feasibility of modifying or
eliminating them.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -187
For example, the County’s parking standards could potentially be modified to
allow for smaller parking spaces, establish maximum parking spaces per
project type or facilitate use of permeable pavement surfaces and
landscaping in parking lots without requiring variances.
6 -188 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -189
6.5 Housing
Accomplishments
In order to craft an effective housing strategy for the 2023 to 2031 planning
period, the County must assess the achievements of the existing housing
programs. This assessment will allow the County to evaluate the
effectiveness and continued appropriateness of the existing programs and
make adjustments for the next eight years.
A. EVALUATION OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS
UNDER ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT
Contra Costa County’s last Housing Element was adopted in late 2014. The
Element sets forth a series of housing programs with related objectives for
the following seven areas:
Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
Housing Production
Special Needs Housing
Housing Affordability
Provision of Adequate Residential Sites
Removal of Governmental Constraints
Equal Housing Opportunity
Energy Conservation and Sustainable Development
The following discussion summarizes the County’s housing accomplishments
in each of the eight areas from 2015 through 2022. Appendix B provides a
more detailed assessment of each housing program established in the 2014
Housing Element. The County had mixed results in implementing its
programs. Contra Costa County, like other jurisdictions, was impacted by the
national emergency declaration due to the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing
contact with residents, restricting construction, extending permit and
inspection timeframes, limiting materials, equipment, and contractor
availability. Regardless of this setback, the County funded 35 projects under
the Neighborhood Preservation Program, weatherized 1,400 units, resolved
1,632 code enforcement cases, provided nearly $23.2 million to preserve
affordable housing,awarded CDBG and HOME funds for various projects
within the county and cities. In addition, the County updated the Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance, approved numerous accessory dwelling units (ADUs),
required accessible units in CDBG- and HOME-funded projects, administered
the County's homeless Continuum of Care, adopted the agricultural worker
housing ordinance, and supported additional housing efforts as described
further in Appendix B. These efforts supported special needs populations
including, but not limited to, low-income households, people with disabilities,
farmworkers, and people experiencing homelessness.
1. Housing and Neighborhood
Conservation
To maintain and improve the quality of the housing stock and residential
neighborhoods, the County has been active in providing residential
rehabilitation assistance through a variety of programs. These programs
include County funded acquisition and rehabilitation of existing rental
housing, preservation of affordable housing, owner-occupied housing
rehabilitation, and small (one to eight unit) rental rehabilitation.
6 -190 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Acquisition/Rehabilitation
The County funds the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing rental
housing by affordable housing developers using CDBG, HOME, NSP, and
HOPWA funds. These funds are offered countywide as low-interest deferred
loans in exchange for long-term affordability. The rehabilitation of rental
properties has been critical to preserving and increasing the supply of
affordable housing in the County.
The County assisted in the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of 487 rental
units in the Contra Costa Centre area, 56 rental units in the Antioch area,
and 14 units in Bay Point. The County also awarded $151,000 to Richmond
Neighborhood Housing Services (RNHS) in CDBG funds for the rehabilitation
of three single-family homes in Richmond affordable to and occupied by low-
income families. An additional 158 households were assisted with Mortgage
Credit Certificates (MCC) downpayment assistance loans for a total of over
$10 million in MCC assistance.
Preservation of Existing Affordable Housing
To preserve the affordability of low-income use-restricted units, the County
has refinanced various housing projects with new tax-exempt bond issues. .
((Consider deleting because this is with in the city))
Owner-Occupied Rehab
Between 2015 and 2021, the County assisted in the rehabilitation of 54
ownership housing units throughout Contra Costa County.
2. Special Needs Housing
One of the major goals of the County is to meet the housing and supportive
services needs of special needs groups, including people with disabilities,
the elderly, the homeless, and farm workers. Since 2015, the County has
made significant progress towards this goal. The County worked diligently to
address the housing needs of special needs groups during the previous
planning period. Some of the cumulative accomplishments are highlighted
below.
All Special Needs Groups
The County provided funding assistance for rehabilitation of 1,116 existing
extremely low-income housing units. The County promoted construction of
more accessible, naturally affordable units through the County’s ADU
Ordinance. The County supported (through funding or granting of density
bonuses) a 42-unit rental project in North Richmond, a 193-unit multi-family
project in Bay Point, and a 325-unit multi-family apartment project in ,the
unincorporated Walnut Creek area that includes 12 very low-income units
and 24 moderate-income units.
Senior Housing
Recognizing the special needs of the elderly, the County has provided design
flexibility in the development of senior housing. In addition, the County has
provided financial assistance in the development of affordable housing for
lower-income seniors. During the previous planning period, the County
continued planning efforts to construct the Rodeo Senior Housing
development.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -191
Housing for Persons with Disabilities
The County provided funding in North Richmond for four fully accessible
units, three physically disabled units, and one vision/hearing impaired unit.
The County also provided funding for projects located in the Cities of
Antioch, Concord, El Cerrito, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek that included a
total of 19 fully accessible units, 14 units accessable to physically disabled,
and 5 units accessable to vision/hearing-impaired . The County requires
accessible units in all new construction projects that received HOME or
CDBG funding and in rehabilitation projects, when feasible. Between 2015
and 2020, the County funded 18 projects countywide that included unit
accessibility upgrades.
Persons Experiencing Homelessness
The County has also played an active role in providing housing to homeless
individuals and families. Contra Costa County has nine interim housing (or
emergency shelters) for homeless individuals, families, and youth totaling
402 beds. Within the Central County shelter, Concord & Brookside Adult
Interim Housing, there is a respite shelter for medically fragile adults.
Female-Headed Households
The County provided NSP funds to support construction of two low-income
rental housing units in North Richmond for women leaving prison.
Farmworkers
The County updated the agricultural worker housing ordinance in 2017 to
comply with State law and allowing for the permitting of farmworker housing
by right and through a discretionary reivew process for larger projects.
3. Housing Affordability
Affordable Homeownership Opportunities
In addition to facilitating new construction of affordable housing (as
described above), the County has also been active in promoting housing
affordability by expanding homeownership opportunities. One
homeownership assistance program is the Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC)
program administered by the County. Between 2015 and 2020, the County
provided 158 households with Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC)
throughout the county and cities for a total of over $10 million in MCC
assistance.
Aside from the MCC, the County has implemented various programs to
provide affordable homeownership opportunities to lower- and moderate-
income households. The County’s homebuyer assistance programs include
the following: RDA (former Redevelopment Agency funds), NSP, HOME and
CDBG funds have been used for new construction and rehabilitation of
single-family homes. Following completion, these funds are rolled over into
deferred equity share loans for low-income homebuyers.Through
agreements with developers, homes affordable to low- and moderate-
income homebuyers have been constructed as a component of market-rate
housing developments.
6 -192 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
4. Removal of Governmental Constraints
To stimulate housing development, the County updated the ADU Ordinance
in 2017 to streamline internal conversions. The County recently
administered the Contra Costa County Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Incentive Program, which ran from 2019 through mid-202. In addition, the
County has been working on updating its code to include objective design
standards. That work is expected to occur in 2022. In addition, the County
prepared a revised ordinance to remove the minimum lot size requirements
for Planned Unit Development projects. County staff identified potential
amendments, such as eliminating the existing minimum acreage
requirements for a P-1 district and granting the Zoning Administrator the
ability to decide additional application types for properties within P-1
Districts, which will ease the entitlement process for housing developments.
As of 2022, County staff is in the process of finalizing language for a formal
ordinance amendment proposal. The County also administers the Quick
Turn-around Program to expedite permit review.
The County recently administered the Contra Costa County Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) Incentive Program, which ran from 2019 through mid-
2021, to facilitate the legalization of illegally built ADUS by waiving late filing
fees for ADU Permit applications and waiving penalty fees for building
permits.
5. Promotion of Equal Housing
Opportunity
The County adopted its Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI)
in June 2019. The AI is a review of impediments or barriers that affect the
rights of fair housing choice. It covers public and private policies, practices,
and procedures affecting housing choice. The AI serves as the basis for fair
housing planning, provides essential information to policymakers,
administrative staff, housing providers, lenders, and fair housing advocates,
and assists in building public support for fair housing efforts
6. Provision of Adequate Residential Sites
As documented in the Land Inventory: Vacant & Underutilized Sites Analysis,
the County had more than an adequate number of residential sites to meet
the assigned 2015 – 2023 Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA). The
inventory identified just over 3,318 new units on vacant and underutilized
properties distributed among the unincorporated communities within the
County’s Urban Limit Line.
The most significant change to the inventory since the adoption of the 2014
Housing Element Update is that the County is comprehensively updating the
General Plan and Zoning Code. The majority of the sites in this Housing
Element are proposed to receive a change in land use designation and
allowed density as part of the comprehensive General Plan update currently
underway.
B. HOUSING PRODUCTION IN PREVIOUS
RHNA PERIOD
Between 2015 and 2021, 315 new affordable housing units were
constructed in the County unincorporated areas. Using CDBG, HOME,
HOPWA, Housing Successor (former redevelopment set-aside) funds, and
bond financing, the County facilitated affordable housing development
throughout the County. Table 6-38 summarizes building permit activity since
2015.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -193
TABLE 6-38 COUNTY-WIDE ASSISTED NEW CONSTRUCTION
2015-2021
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL
Very-low 0 0 0 63 0 0 36 99
Low 8 0 3 171 1 0 33 216
Mod 65 28 31 1 4 0 36 165
Above Mod 276 201 244 434 214 137 422 1,928
TOTAL 349 229 278 669 219 137 527 2,408
This level of affordable housing production exhibited above is largely the
result of the County’s partnership with housing developers in the area. The
County has been active in meeting with local developers, community groups,
and other jurisdictions to review housing needs and develop effective
strategies to meet those needs. The County also participates in various
regional and local organizations concerned with housing issues. County staff
provides ongoing technical assistance to non-profit and for-profit developers
in the development and financing of affordable housing.
6 -194 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -195
6.6 Housing Plan
Sections 6.2 through 6.5 of the Housing Element present a housing needs
assessment; an analysis of constraints to housing provision; an inventory of
land, financial, and administrative resources; as well as an evaluation of past
housing accomplishments. This section presents the County’s eight-year
Housing Plan, which sets forth goals, policies, and programs to address the
identified h ousing needs and other important housing issues.
The County’s housing plan for addressing the identified housing needs is
detailed according to the following six areas:
• Provision of Adequate Residential Sites
• Assist in the Development of Adequate Housing to Meet the Needs of
Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and Persons with Special
Needs
• Conserve and Improve the Existing Housing Stock
• Preserve Units At R isk of Conversion to Market-Rate Units
• Address and Remove or Mitigate Governmental Constraints
• Equal Housing Opportunities
A. HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES, AND
ACTIONS
The following are the goals, policies , and actions the County intends to
implement to address the community’s identified housing needs and issues.
Policies
HE-P1.1
Assist low-income homeowners in maintaining and improving
residential properties through housing rehabilitation and
energy-efficiency assistance programs. Promote increased
awareness among property owners and residents of the
importance of property maintenance to neighborhood
quality.
HE-P1.2
To the extent practicable, focus rehabilitation expenditures
and code enforcement efforts in communities with a high
concentration of older and/or substandard residential
structures for continued reinvestment in established
neighborhoods. The goal of the code enforcement efforts is
to improve overall quality of life in these neighborhoods.
Goal HE-1
Maintain and improve the quality of the existing housing
stock and residential neighborhoods in Contra Costa
County, including preserve the existing affordable housing
stock.
6 -196 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
HE-P1.3
Assist non-profit partners in acquiring and rehabilitating older
residential structures and maintaining them as long-term
affordable housing.
HE-P1.4
Ensure that the County’s condominium conversion
ordinance (Chapter 926-2.202) mitigates impacts to
displaced tenants and ensures the quality of units being sold
to homeowners.
HE-P1.5
Preserve existing affordable housing developments at risk of
converting to market-rate housing through promotion of
bond refinancing and other mechanisms.
Actions
HE-A1.1
Action: Continue to provide rehabilitation loans through the
Neighborhood Preservation Program to extremely low-, very
low- and low-income households and to promote the
program.
Background: Through the Neighborhood Preservation
Program, the County provides home rehabilitation loans to
extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households to
make necessary home repairs and improve their homes.
Department of Conservation and Development (DCD)
administers this program, which is available to income-
qualified households throughout the urban county. Eligible
residents may receive assistance for a variety of home
improvement activities, including but not limited to, re-
roofing, plumbing/heating/electrical repairs, termite and dry-
rot repair, modifications for disabled accessibility, security,
exterior painting, and energy conservation. Specific loan
terms are based on financial need and may be zero or 3
percent, deferred or amortized.
DCD has identified the following unincorporated areas for
focused rehabilitation assistance: Bay Point, Bethel Island,
Byron, Clyde, Crockett, El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, North
Richmond, Rodeo, Rollingwood, and the Vine Hill area near
Martinez.
Eight-Year Objectives: Disseminate information on housing
rehabilitation assistance through the County’s website,
public access cable channels, notices in the press,
presentations, and distribution of brochures to public service
agencies and community groups, and mailings to county
residents. Rehabilitate a minimum of 5 units annually for a
total of 40 units over 8 years.
Funding Source: NPP and Weatherization, Measure X housing
funds
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Consider new applications annually
HE-A1.2
Action: Continue to offer the free weatherization program for
extremely-low, very-low and low-income homeowners.
Background: The County DCD offers a free weatherization
program to assist extremely low-, very low-, and low-income
homeowners and renters in improving residential energy
efficiency and, as a result, reducing their energy bills. The
program’s energy saving improvements include minor home
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -197
repairs and appliance and fixture replacements, such as
attic insulation, weather stripping, pipe wrapping, furnace
filters, shower heads, heaters/ovens, ceiling fans, door
bottoms, etc. I
Eight-Year Objectives: Assist 150 households annually for a
total of 1200 households over 8 years. Provide education on
energy conservation.
Funding Source: Low-Income Housing Energy Assistance
Program (LIHEAP)
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
HE-A1.3
Action: Consider development of a vacant property
registration ordinance to address issues on vacant properties
in urban areas.
Background: If a vacant property registration ordinance
were put in place it would include a fee to cover the costs
for the County to address issues on vacant properties in
urban areas. Issues addressed on these types of properties
would include derelict buildings, illegal dumping, homeless
encampments, overgrown vegetation, for reduction of
reduce blight.
Eight-Year Objectives: If adopted, register and remediate
any issues on at least 100 properties during the planning
period.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Consider establishing a vacant property
registration ordinance by 2025.
HE-A1.4
Action: Continue code enforcement.
Background: Code Enforcement is responsible for enforcing
both State and County regulations governing the
maintenance of all buildings and properties in
unincorporated areas through complaint-based inspections
and ensuring remediation.
To facilitate correction of code violations or deficiencies,
Code Enforcement works closely with other County
agencies. Code enforcement staff routinely refers
homeowners to the County’s rehabilitation loan and grants
programs, including the Neighborhood Preservation
Program. The staff also refers homeowners, mobile home
owners, and apartment owners to the County’s
Weatherization Program.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to carry out code
enforcement activities as a means to maintain the quality of
the housing stock and residential neighborhoods. Continue
to refer eligible homeowners, mobile home owners, and
apartment owners to County programs for assistance.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
6 -198 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
HE-A1.5
Action: Prevent conversion of deed-restricted affordable
housing units in multi-family developments to market-rate
units through the following actions: Update and monitor the
inventory of all dwelling units in the unincorporated county
that include units subject to enforceable affordability
requirements. The inventory will include, at a minimum, the
number of units, the funding government program, and the
date on which the units are at risk of conversion to market-
rate.
• Monitor the status of affordable projects, rental projects,
and mobile homes in unincorporated Contra Costa
County. Should the property owners indicate the desire
to convert properties, consider providing technical and
financial assistance, when possible, to ensure long-term
affordability.
• Work with local service providers to identify funding to
subsidize at-risk units in a way mirroring the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Project Based Voucher (Section 8) program. Funding
sources may include state or local funding sources.
Background:
As of 2021, a total of 1,686 publicly assisted housing units in
multifamily developments are in the unincorporated areas of
the county. Of these units, 49 units in El Sobrante Silvercrest
and 134 units in Park Regency are at risk of conversion to
market-rate housing by 2033.
Pursuant to state law (Government Code Sections 65853.10,
65863.11, and 65863.13), owners of deed-restricted
affordable projects are required to provide notice of
restrictions that are expiring to all prospective tenants,
existing tenants, and the County within 3 years, 12 months,
and 6 months before the scheduled expiration of rental
restrictions. In addition, the County or owner will provide
notice to HUD, the California Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD), the Contra Costa County
Housing Authority, and the local legal aid organization.
Owners shall also refer tenants of at-risk units to educational
resources regarding:
• Tenant rights
• Conversion procedures
• Information regarding Section 8 rent subsidies
• Any other affordable housing opportunities in the county.
In addition, notice from the owner shall be required prior to
conversion of any units to market rate for any additional
deed-restricted lower-income units that were constructed
with the aid of government funding, that were required by
inclusionary ordinance requirements, that were part of a
project granted a density bonus, or that were part of a
project that received other incentives.
If a development is offered for sale, HCD must certify persons
or entities that are eligible to purchase the development and
to receive notice of the pending sale. Placement on the
eligibility list will be based on experience with affordable
housing.
When necessary, the County shall continue to work with
property owners of deed-restricted affordable units who
need to sell within 45 years of initial sale. When the seller is
unable to sell to an eligible buyer within a specified time
period, equity-sharing provisions are established (pursuant to
the affordable housing agreement for the property),
whereby the difference between the affordable and market
value is paid to the County to eliminate any incentive to sell
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -199
the converted unit at market rate. Funds generated would
be used to develop additional affordable housing in the
county. The County shall continue tracking all residential
projects that include affordable housing to ensure that the
affordability is maintained for at least 45 years for owner-
occupied units and 55 years (subject to program
requirements) for rental units, and that any sale or change
of ownership of these affordable units prior to satisfying the
45- or 55-year restriction shall be “rolled over” for another 45
or 55 years to protect “at-risk” units.
Eight-Year Objectives: Monitor all at-risk units as detailed in
the program. As required by state law, provide information
regarding tenant rights and conversion procedures should
the property owner be uninterested in refinancing and offer
tenants information regarding Section 8 rental subsidies and
other available assistance through County agencies and
non-profit organizations.
Funding Source: Measure X, CalHFA Help Program;
Multifamily Housing Program; HOME, CalHFA (preservation
acquisition financing); mortgage insurance for
purchase/refinance (HUD).
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD (Housing Authority
for Section 8)
Timeframe: Ongoing communication with owners, service
providers, and eligible potential purchasers; work with owners
of deed-restricted units on an ongoing basis—particularly at
the time of change of ownership.
Policies
HE-P2.1
Support development of affordable housing by non-profit
and for-profit developers through affordable housing funding
sources, regulatory incentives such as density bonus, and/or
flexible development standards through planned unit
developments.
HE-P2.2
Encourage and promote the production of housing in close
proximity to public transportation and services.
HE-P2.3
Increase the supply of affordable housing and mixed-
income housing through the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
HE-P2.4
Encourage accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and junior
accessory dwelling unit (JADU) construction as a viable
means of meeting affordable housing needs by design.
Goal HE-2
Increase the supply of housing with a priority on the
development of affordable housing, including housing
affordable to extremely low-income households.
6 -200 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
HE-P2.5
Encourage innovative housing design and building types to
lower housing costs and provide high quality options for
affordable housing.
HE-P2.6
Plan for a variety of housing types in the county. Encourage
innovative, nontraditional designs and layouts in response to
evolving housing needs. Provide housing opportunities for all
economic segments of the community while ensuring
compatibility with surrounding uses.
Actions
HE-A2.1
Action: Provide funding or financial incentives for new
affordable housing development.
Background: Non-profit and for-profit housing developers
play an important role in providing affordable housing in
Contra Costa County. Over the years, the County has
provided direct financial assistance, regulatory incentives,
and land write-downs to many developers that construct
ownership and/or rental housing to extremely low-, very low-,
low-income, and special-needs households. Major sources of
County financing include annual entitlement grants of
CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA funds. The County reserves 45
percent of each year’s CDBG allocation to acquire and
maintain affordable housing in the urban county. The County
also serves as an issuer of tax-exempt bond financing when
developers seek tax-exempt financing. Projects have been
completed with County resources in both unincorporated
areas and the cities.
Funding is awarded annually on a competitive application
basis to developers of multifamily rental housing and
homeownership developments countywide for gap
financing. A notice of funding availability is issued in the fall.
Applications are due in late fall/early winter, with funding
recommendations made prior to the first 9-percent tax credit
round in the spring. Funding criteria include proposed target
population and alleviation of affordable housing needs,
cost-effectiveness, developer experience, and term of
affordability. The County Board of Supervisors has adopted a
funding priority for projects that reserve a portion of the units
for extremely low-income households.
County staff maintains continuous contact with numerous
affordable housing developers. County staff offers formal
technical assistance and guidance as well as frequent
consultations with interested developers.
The County awards of HOME and CDBG funds to affordable
housing developers provide local funds, which help leverage
other local, state, and federal funds.
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Continue to support affordable housing development
through direct gap financial assistance. Sources of
financial assistance available through the County
include Measure X, HOME, CDBG, HOPWA, local
inclusionary housing fees, state grants, and tax-exempt
bond financing.
• Meet with the local development community, key
leaders, and local civic and community groups to
promote the County’s interest in working cooperatively
to increase housing development activity.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -201
• Allow techniques such as smaller unit sizes, parking
reduction, common dining facilities and fewer required
amenities for senior projects.
• Continue to provide low-interest loans to non-profit
organizations to develop housing affordable to
extremely low- and very low-income households.
• Encourage applications by nonprofit organizations for
affordable housing funds, including federal, state, and
local public and private funds.
• Collaborate to the extent feasible with HACCC to
explore the use of project-based Section 8 assistance as
leverage to obtain additional private-sector funds for
affordable housing development.
• Encourage the financing and development of 500
affordable units over 8 years.
Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, Measure X/Housing
Trust Fund, local funds, Bond-financing
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Annually award HOME, CDBG, and HOPWA
funds to experienced housing developers (federal funds are
not limited to projects in the unincorporated county).
Support the development of 100 lower-income unit to
reduce displacement risk and provide housing mobility
opportunities.
HE-A2.2
Action: Pursue affordable housing development on County
(Housing Successor)-owned land in North Richmond, Bay
Point, and Rodeo.
Background: On February 1, 2012, redevelopment agencies
throughout the State of California were eliminated. The
statute eliminating redevelopment allowed housing assets to
be retained by the redevelopment host jurisdiction (known
as Housing Successors). Contra Costa County owns land
designated for housing in Bay Point, North Richmond, and
Rodeo. The Housing Successor provided pre-development
and construction funds to Community Housing Development
Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC). In addition, the
Housing Successor approved predevelopment and
construction funding to the Rodeo Senior (Phase 2) project..
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to work on closing of escrow
for approved .98 acre site in Rodeo Town Center and
facilitate the construction of 67 senior lower income units and
facilitate the construction of approved Bay Point Orbisonia
Heights development in three phases for 384 lower income
units. These sites and additional housing assets have been
offered in a Surplus Property Notification.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: All sites have been offered through a Notice of
Availability of Surplus Land in April 2022. Several sites
continue to be available and will continue to be marketed
during the 8-year cycle.
HE-A2.3
Action: Increase the supply of affordable housing through
implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO).
Provide incentives for developers subject to IHO who provide
affordable units with three or more bedrooms in areas of
concentrated overcrowding.
6 -202 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Background: The County’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
(IHO) has been in place since 2006. All new residential
developments of five or more units, as well as condominium
conversions, are subject to the IHO, which requires fifteen
percent of the project’s residential units to be affordable.
• Rental Projects: 12 percent to lower-income households
and 3 percent to very low-income households.
• For-Sale Projects: 12 percent to moderate-income
households and 3 percent to low-income households.
Developers may comply with the IHO through several
alternative approaches:
• On-site development
• Off-site development
• Land conveyance
• Payment of a fee in lieu of development
• Other – developers may propose another method of
compliance that would have at least the same benefit
as on-site construction.
During this Housing Element planning period, the County will
conduct a policy review of the IHO and implement changes
including an updated (self-adjusting) fee schedule for in-lieu
fees and removing some alternative methods of
compliance. The update will also include:
• Encouraging on-site affordable units (as opposed to in-
lieu fees) through methods like proactive outreach with
the community, assisting with funding through various tax
incentives, streamlining entitlement processes, and
revising County ordinance and fees, and
• Creating incentives for developers that build affordable
units with three or more bedrooms in areas of
concentrated overcrowding (i.e., Bay Point, North
Richmond according to Section 6.2.G Assessment of Fair
Housing).
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to implement the IHO and
encourage developers to provide affordable units on site.
Provide the collected in-lieu fees as part of the annual NOFA
to support the development of new affordable housing
projects in the unincorporated area. Review and update the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, as necessary. Facilitate the
construction of 150 affordable units as a result of the IHO to
increase housing mobility opportunities.
Funding Source: None required
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing and update ordinance, as practicable,
by 2025.
HE-A2.4
Action: Prioritize funding for affordable housing providers for
acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing to preserve
units, facilitate place-based revitalization, and increase
mobility options.
Background: The County offers financial assistance, including
CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA funds to affordable housing
developers for the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing
rental housing. Offer these as low-interest deferred loans in
exchange for long-term affordability restrictions on the rental
units. Priority will be encouraged for projects that reserve a
portion of the units for extremely low-income households.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -203
Eight-Year Objectives: Assist in the acquisition and
rehabilitation of 50 affordable units to encourage place-
based revitalization and preserve opportunities for housing
mobility for lower-income households. The County will
prioritize acquisition of at least 25 of the target units in high-
resource areas.
Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, Bond Financing
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
HE-A2.5
Action: Maintain consistency with ADU state law in the
County Ordinance Code. Promote ADU construction in high-
resource areas/areas of concentrated affluence.
Background: Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are attached
or detached dwelling units that provide complete,
independent living facilities for one or more persons that are
located on the same lot as or in the primary residence and
includes permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking
and sanitation. Integrating ADUs in existing neighborhoods is
a means of increasing the supply of affordable by design
rental housing. The development of ADUs is also effective in
dispersing affordable housing throughout the
unincorporated areas and can provide housing to lower-
and moderate-income individuals and families, as well as
seniors and persons with disabilities. The County is currently
updating its ADU ordinance to allow for the sale of an ADU
separate from the primary residence pursuant to
Government Code Section 65852.26. The County will
continue to update its ADU ordinance to comply with
current state law as needed during the planning period. The
County will continue to further promote accessory dwellings.
ADUs provide added housing without added land cost, and
as such, are more likely to be affordable to low- and
moderate-income households on the rental market when
compared to a conventional single-family dwelling on the
rental market. The County will monitor production of ADUs as
the planning period progresses and will consider
implementation of additional actions if numbers of ADUs are
not meeting target numbers anticipated in this Housing
Element. The County has promoted the application of ADUs
by streamlining the process and making the application
available on the website. To promote housing mobility
opportunities, the County will prioritize promotion of ADUs in
high resource areas, such as Alhambra Valley, Reliez Valley,
Briones, Alamo, Diablo, and Castle Hill areas while also
continuing to encourage ADU production in all communities
where affordable housing is needed.
Eight-Year Objectives: Publicize the ADU Program to increase
public awareness. Approve building permits for 312 ADUs
over the 8-year period (39 per year), targeting 150 of these
ADUs in high resource areas to encourage socioeconomic
integration through housing mobility opportunities for lower-
income households.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing. Complete ADU ordinance updated
that is currently underway by 2023. Continue to review ADU
ordinance for any needed updates for compliance with
current state law starting in 2024 and every two years
thereafter through the end of the planning period.
6 -204 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
HE-A2.6
Action: Explore development of new programs or policies to
potentially fund or incentivize affordable housing
development. Programs will include updating ADU
regulations as needed to remain compliant with state law
and implement other community goals. In addition,
programs may include implementing urban housing
development projects (as allowed under SB 9), and creating
objective design standards.
Background: Facilitating and allowing certain housing types
and streamlining processes can help facilitate more housing
choices for county residents.
Eight-Year Objectives: Explore and evaluate new ideas for
potential updates and implementation.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Staff is working on an updated ADU Ordinance
and expects adoption in 2023 (658526.6)
HE-A2.7
Action: Facilitate development of tiny homes and other
innovative types of housing products as alternatives to
accommodate people who are unhoused or face housing
instability. Evaluate the availability of County-owned land for
such housing.
Eight-Year Objectives: Study the viability of tiny homes and
other innovative housing types during the planning period. If
new housing types prove viable, facilitate development of at
least 25 units.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD; Public Works
Timeframe: Evaluate properties for potential inventory by
2025
HE-A2.8
Action: Amend the County Ordinance Code to include an
ordinance authorized pursuant to Senate Bill 10 unless
determined infeasible or nonbeneficial.
Background: Senate Bill (SB) 10 (2021) creates a voluntary
process for local governments to access a streamlined
zoning process for new multi-unit housing near transit or in
urban infill areas, with up to 10 units per parcel, without need
for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis.
However, much more analysis, consideration, and public
involvement would be required to determine if SB 10’s
provisions are appropriate for the County. The County will
review the provisions of SB 10 to explore how it might be used
to enhance housing construction in areas close to transit.
Eight-Year Objectives: Adoption of County Ordinance Code
amendments pursuant to SB 10.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Review and consideration by December 2025.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -205
HE-A2.9
Action: Promote funding for innovation pilot programs and
capacity building technical assistance for affordable
housing activities (acquisition, predevelopment,
construction, rehabilitation, and operating and reserve
funds).
Background: Measure X provides opportunities to create
more programs and dedicate more resources towards
innovative housing solutions.
Eight-Year Objectives: Promote innovation grant program.
Funding Source: DCD (Measure X and State Local Housing
Trust Fund)
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Post an annual NOFA to award new housing
solution ideas.
Policies
HE-P3.1
Expand affordable housing opportunities for households with
special needs, including but not limited to seniors, persons
with disabilities, large households, single parents, persons with
HIV/AIDS, persons with mental illness, persons with
development disabilities, farmworkers, and persons
experiencing homelessness.
HE-P3.2
Continue to support non-profit service providers that help
meet the diverse housing and supportive service needs of
the community.
HE-P3.3
Continue to require inclusion of ADA accessible units in all
new construction projects receiving County financing.
HE-P3.4
Encourage housing programs that provide wrap-around
social and supportive services for residents in need of
services.
Actions
HE-A3.1
Action: Work with housing developers and housing service
providers to address the needs of those with special housing
needs.
Goal HE-3
Increase the supply of appropriate and supportive housing
for special-needs populations. social and economic
resources among all communities in the county so that
Impacted Communities are not disproportionately
burdened by environmental pollution or other hazards.
6 -206 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Background: In addition to the development of affordable
housing in general, the County will work with housing
developers to provide housing appropriate to the County’s
special-needs populations, including persons with
intellectual, developmental, mental and physical disabilities,
seniors, large households, persons with HIV/AIDS, and
farmworkers. Work with the Regional Center of the East Bay
to identify any outstanding housing needs for its clients within
unincorporated Contra Costa County, assist in identifying
available housing that meets those criteria, and consider a
rental assistance program to fill the gap between income
levels and the cost of housing for persons with
developmental disabilities. Collaborate with the Center to
the extent feasible to establish an outreach program that
informs residents within the county on housing and services
available for persons with developmental disabilities.
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Provide financial incentives for the development of 110
units of housing targeted to special-needs populations
(HOME, CDBG, and HOPWA).
• Engage with developers to obtain additional required
financing.
• Consider allowing techniques such as smaller unit sizes,
parking reduction, common dining facilities, and fewer
required amenities for senior projects.
• Continue to fund housing developments appropriate for
persons with developmental disabilities, including
housing with wrap-around services.
• Collaborate with Regional Center of the East Bay to
establish needs of those with developmental disabilities.
Funding Source: CDBG, HOME, ESG
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Annually: Include a priority for special-needs
housing in the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for
CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, and local funds.
HE-A3.2
Action: Continue to offer housing opportunities and funding
to facilitate housing for those with disabilities. Create a
reasonable accommodation procedure.
Background: Persons with disabilities represent an important
special-needs group in Contra Costa County. To maintain
independent living, persons with disabilities are likely to
require assistance, which may include special housing design
features, income support for those who are unable to work,
and in-home supportive services for persons with mobility
limitations. To provide additional housing opportunities for
persons with disabilities, the County will continue to require
inclusion of accessible units in all new construction projects
receiving County financing (e.g., CDBG, HOME). Current
federal regulations require that 5 percent of the units must be
accessible to the physically impaired and an additional 2
percent of the units must be accessible to the hearing/vision
impaired.
To facilitate the development of appropriate housing for
persons with special needs, the County works to remove
development constraints and provide reasonable
accommodations in the development of such housing as
requests are made. The County will evaluate and explore this
practice as written reasonable accommodation procedures.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -207
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Continue to require inclusion of 5 percent accessible
units for physically impaired and 2 percent accessible
units for hearing/visually impaired in all new construction
projects receiving County financing, for a minimum of (5
units for physically disabled and 2 for visual/hearing
impairment based on 100 assisted units).
• Provide 40 zero- and low-interest loans through the
Neighborhood Preservation Program for accessibility
improvements in existing affordable owner-occupied,
single-family residential units by end of planning period.
• Implement reasonable accommodation procedures to
provide special consideration in zoning and land use for
housing for persons with disabilities. The County will strive
to make accommodations a ministerial process, with a
minimal processing fee, subject to the approval of the
Zoning Administrator who will apply the following
decision-making criteria:
1. Whether the requested reasonable accommodation
would require a fundamental alteration in the nature
of a County program or law, including, but not limited
to, land use and zoning.
2. The request for reasonable accommodation will be
for the benefit of an individual with a disability
protected under fair housing laws.
3. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary
for the individual to have equal opportunity to use
and enjoy the housing and housing-related services;
4. The requested accommodation would not impose an
undue financial or administrative burden on the
County.
Funding Source: DCD, CDBG, HOME, Measure X, PLHA
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Annually: Include a priority for special-needs
housing in CDBG, HOME, HOPWA NOFA. Draft reasonable
accommodation procedure by 2024.
HE-A3.3
Action: Address needs of persons experiencing
homelessness
Background: The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness
appointed by the Board of Supervisors, provides advice and
input on the operations of homeless services, program
operations, and program development efforts in Contra
Costa County. The Council provides a forum for the
Continuum of Care to communicate about the
implementation of strategies to prevent and end
homelessness including the Forging Ahead Towards
Preventing and Ending Homelessness (Ten-Year) Plan. These
plans are designed to address the needs of persons
experiencing homelessness. The goal of these programs is to
ensure that unhoused individuals and families can obtain
decent, suitable, and affordable housing in the County.
Through the Ten-Year Plan, the County has adopted a
“housing first” strategy, which states homelessness is first a
housing issue, and that necessary supports and access to
comprehensive and integrated services is essential to
achieving long-term housing stability. In addition, the
Continuum of Care collaborates with entities such as the
Contra Costa Council on Homelessness, the Department of
6 -208 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Conservation and Development, and Cities to develop and
implement transitional facilities, permanent and longer-term
housing, and services for people facing homelessness and
housing instability. The CoC provides adequate funding or
other supports to maintain and/or abate homeless
encampments and provide adequate security for the
Coordinated Outreach, Referral and Engagement Teams
(CORE). CoC programs link people experiencing
homelessness with supportive services, such as behavioral
health, substance use services, and primary healthcare.
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Continue to update the Ten-Year Plan
• Continue to work with local non-profit organizations and
relevant public agencies to encourage funding of
permanent supportive housing unit projects.
• Continue to support existing transitional housing
programs, operated by the County and non-profit
agencies.
• Continue to support the operations of existing
emergency shelters.
• Continue to support licensed residential care facilities in
all residential zones through the land use permit process
for 7 or more residents.
Funding Source: Hearth Act, CDBG, HOPWA, HOME, ESG
Responsible Agency/Department: Health Services; DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
Policies
HE-P4.1
Encourage access to homeownership for lower- and
moderate-income households.
HE-P4.2
Continue to support the provision of rental assistance to
extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households.
HE-P4.3
Prioritize and encourage financial support to non-profit
organizations that own or operate housing for persons with
developmental disabilities.
HE-P4.4
Designate additional land to address the County’s Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation.
Goal HE-4
Improve housing affordability for both renters and
homeowners.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -209
Actions
HE-A4.1
Action: Promote the availability of programs that facilitate
homeownership opportunities, including assistance for first-
time homebuyers.
Background: The County implements programs to provide
affordable homeownership opportunities for lower- and
moderate-income households as well as special-needs
groups, including farmworkers. These programs include the
following:
• New Construction: HOME and CDBG (in support of
new construction) funds are used for new construction
of single-family homes.
• Inclusionary Housing: Through the Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance, homes affordable to lower- and
moderate-income homebuyers are constructed as a
component of market-rate housing developments.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to expand homeownership
opportunities through a combination of financial support of
new construction, and development agreements. Assist 50
first-time homebuyers over the cycle.
Funding Source: HOME, CDBG, Measure X
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
HE-A4.2
Action: Encourage affordable housing developers to seek
state and federal funding to support the construction and
rehabilitation of low-income housing, particularly for housing
that is affordable to extremely low-income households. The
County shall also seek state and federal funding specifically
targeted for the development of housing affordable to
extremely low-income households, should they become
available.
Background: The County is an entitlement jurisdiction for the
CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. It is a sub-grantee for the
HOPWA program. In addition, the County applies for and
receives approximately $7 million in Hearth Act funds on an
annual basis. The County administers each of these grants for
either most or the entire county (incorporated cities and
towns, and the unincorporated areas). Existing Board of
Supervisor policy gives priority to projects that provide
housing affordable to and occupied by extremely low-
income households. The County shall promote the benefits of
this assistance program to develop housing for extremely
low-income households on its web page and in its program
materials.
Eight-Year Objectives: DCD will promote the ELI
development assistance program to developers (for profit
and non-profit) by including the priority for ELI housing in
information on the HOME, CDBG, and HOPWA programs.
Funding Source: HOME, CDBG, Measure X, State (as funding
is available)
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Annually include a priority for extremely low-
income housing in CDBG, HOME, HOPWA NOFA.
6 -210 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Policies
HE-P5.1
Maintain an up-to-date site inventory that details the
amount, type, and size of vacant and underutilized parcels,
and assist developers in identifying land suitable for
residential development.
HE-P5.2
Provide adequate sites to meet the housing needs of
special-needs groups, including seniors, persons with
disabilities, large households, single parents, persons with
HIV/AIDS, persons with mental illness, farmworkers, and the
homeless.
HE-P5.3
Promote mixed-use development by eliminating minimum
area requirement to establish a P-1 District.
Actions
HE-A5.1
Action: Increase the supply of land zoned for high-density
housing. This will include creation of new zoning districts for
consistency with the new General Plan land use
designations. Amend the General Plan and County
Ordinance Code, as needed and detailed in Section 6.4, to
provide adequate sites for at least 3,266 lower-income units
Background: To address the 2023-2031 RHNA, amend the
General Plan and County Ordinance Code, to provide
adequate sites for at least 3,266 lower-income units.
Redesignating and rezoning parcels in the sites exhibits in
Appendix A, Table B will address the shortfall of suitably
designated and zoned sites to address the lower-income
RHNA. The allowed base density in the land use district and
County Ordinance Code designation on all listed sites will be
amended to permit 30 dwelling units per acre (or greater)
with a minimum density of 20 du/ac. With the proposed
allowed density, each site will permit at least 16 units. At least
half of these sites shall be designated for residential use only.
The exception to this requirement is that lower income
housing needs may be accommodated on sites designated
mixed-use if those sites allow 100-percent residential use and
require that residential uses occupy at least 50 percent of the
total floor area of a mixed-use project. Some of the
requirements of this action will be achieved through
inclusion of new or revised development standards or
updates to processes and procedures in the County
Ordinance Code to address constraints identified in this
Housing Element and facilitate increased densities. The
redesignation and rezoning of the parcels to address the
lower income shortfall must be completed within one year of
the beginning of the 6th Cycle Housing Element planning
period, which is January 31, 2024.
Goal HE-5
Provide adequate sites through appropriate land use and
zoning designations to accommodate the County’s share
of regional housing needs.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -211
Eight-Year Objectives: Provide suitably zoned sites to address
the lower-income RHNA, prioritizing housing opportunities in
high-resource areas to facilitate housing mobility.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Amend zoning by January 31, 2024
HE-A5.2
Action: Change zoning on parcels identified in one or more
prior Housing Element to address state law under
Government Code Section 65583.2(c) and facilitate housing
opportunities on those parcels.
Background: The vacant parcels specified in Appendix A as
having been included in the land inventories of the 5th Cycle
(2014) and 4th Cycle (2009) Contra Costa County Housing
Elements as suitable for lower-income units to address the
County’s RHNA allocation. Per Government Code Section
65583.2(c), to continue to include these parcels in that
portion of the land inventory for this 6th Cycle Housing
Element, the County will update all required zoning and
General Plan provisions to allow projects that have at least
20-percent affordable units (extremely low, very low, or low)
without discretionary review or “by right” (Government Code
Section 65583.2 (i)).
Eight-Year Objectives: Make additional sites available for
lower-income housing development.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Amend General Plan and zoning by January 31,
2024
HE-A5.3
Action: Update mixed use designations in Land Use Element.
Background: The General Plan Land Use Element includes
mixed-use land use designations. These mixed-use
designations have enabled unique projects that combine
residential uses, such as apartments or condominiums, with
commercial and other non-residential uses. Such
developments provide needed housing in close proximity to
key services, such as transportation hubs. The County
anticipates updating this category and increasing allowed
densities as part of the Envision Contra Costa 2040 General
Plan Update, which is currently underway.
Eight-Year Objectives: Expand usage of mixed-use land use
designations to encourage additional mixed-use
development with greater residential densities.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Update General Plan by 2024.
HE-A5.4
Action: Continue to offer density bonuses and to update the
local density bonus ordinance to maintain consistency with
state law.
6 -212 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
Background: In accordance with State law and the County’s
Residential Density Bonus Ordinance, the County provides
density bonuses to qualified new housing projects to
facilitate development of affordable housing consistent with
state and local laws.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to offer density bonuses and
other development incentives to facilitate affordable
housing development. Continue to provide information
regarding the Density Bonus Ordinance to developers at the
application and permit center in DCD as well as during pre-
application meetings.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Update Residential Density Bonus Ordinance for
ongoing compliance with state law annually, or as needed.
HE-A5.5
Action: Facilitate lot consolidation for multi-family infill
development.
Background: Many unincorporated areas designated for
multi-family residential development are fragmented and
contain lots that do not meet current minimum lot size
standards. Consolidation of undersized lots would likely be
necessary to provide an adequate land area to develop an
economically feasible multi-family project. To facilitate the
infill development of multi-family housing, the County has
included some small multi-family residential sites in the sites
inventory that have the potential for consolidation with
adjacent properties.
The County will reach out to local developers and property
owners to discuss development opportunities and incentives
for lot consolidation to accommodate affordable housing
units and consider additional incentives brought forth by
developers.
As developers/owners approach the County with interest in
lot consolidation, the County will consider deferring certain
fees, waive lot merger fees for certain small contiguous lots,
and provide concurrent/fast tracking of project application
reviews to developers who provide affordable housing. The
County will also pursue grant funding for parcel assemblage
land banking when it is available.
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Encourage and support the consolidation of smaller,
contiguous, residential parcels into larger parcels that
would allow for the development of large, well-designed,
multi-family development projects. Continue to offer a
tiered density bonus program to encourage
consolidation of small lots for multifamily development.
• Support consolidation as applicable housing
applications are received.
• Pursue grant funding as feasible during planning period if
California legislation and/or programs enable a tax-
increment or similar program that leads to funding for site
assembly.
• Encourage the construction of 20 lower-income units
through lot consolidation to alleviate displacement risk in
areas where development was not otherwise possible.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -213
Timeframe: Biennially: Review site inventory and adjust for
planned and completed developments. Annually: meet with
developers to receive input about incentives to be created.
Policies
HE-P6.1
Establish and maintain development standards that
streamline housing development while protecting quality of
life goals.
HE-P6.2
Provide financial and/or regulatory incentives where feasible
and appropriate to offset or reduce the costs of affordable
housing development, including density bonuses and
flexibility in site development standards.
HE-P6.3
Encourage P-1 zoning in areas with significant numbers of
non-conforming parcels and uses.
HE-P6.4
Expand efforts to provide for timely and coordinated
processing of residential development projects to minimize
project holding costs and encourage housing production.
Actions
HE-A6.1
Action: Update Title 8 of the County Ordinance Code
Background: The County regulates the type, location,
density, and scale of residential development in the
unincorporated areas primarily through the General Plan
and County Ordinance Code. Zoning regulations are
designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and
general welfare of residents as well as implement the policies
of the County General Plan. The County is engaged in an
ongoing process of reviewing the County Ordinance Code
for consistency with state laws. In addition, the County is
embarking on a comprehensive update to their zoning. The
main purpose of this review is to ensure that the County’s
requirements and standards do not act as a constraint to the
development of affordable housing.
Eight-Year Objectives:
• Periodically review the County Ordinance Code and
other ordinances to ensure to the extent feasible, that
County policies and regulations do not constrain housing
development and affordability.
• As part of the comprehensive zoning update, promote
the diversification of buildings, lot sizes, and open spaces
to produce an environment in harmony with surrounding
existing and potential uses. This work will align with the
new zoning districts and land use designations that will
be put in place by January 31, 2024.
Goal HE-6
Mitigate potential governmental constraints to housing
development and affordability.
6 -214 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
• Current revisions needed to the County Ordinance Code
include:
o Allow employee housing for six persons or fewer
anywhere single-family residential uses are allowed
to comply with the Employee Housing Act.
o Establish a streamlined review process and
standards for eligible projects under SB 35 (2017),
as set forth under Government Code Section
65913.4.
o To affirmatively promote more inclusive
communities, review and revise the County's
requirements for Residential Care Facilities with
seven or more persons and permit them as a
residential use subject only to those restrictions that
apply to other residential dwellings of the same
type in the same zone. These types of facilities are
still subject to state licensing requirements.
o Allow transitional and supportive housing in all
zoning districts in the same way that other housing
is allowed per SB 2 (2007) and also to allow
supportive housing without discretionary review in
areas zoned for residential use where multifamily
and mixed uses are permitted, per Assembly Bill
(AB) 2162 (2018).
o Allow low-barrier navigation centers without
discretionary review in compliance with AB 101 in
areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential
zones permitting multifamily uses.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Complete update of County Ordinance Code
including specified revisions by 2024. Ongoing – periodic
review of zoning and subdivision ordinances.
HE-A6.2
Action: Continue developing and implementing practices to
further streamline approval of planning entitlements and
issuance of building permits for residential projects.
Background: To expedite the review of residential projects,
the County has implemented the following policies and
actions:
• The County Zoning Administrator reviews development
applications for projects with fewer than 100 units.
• The County receives development applications for large
and complex projects that require approvals or
comments from multiple County departments. A monthly
meeting between upper management representatives
facilitates review of these projects. Development issues
are identified early in the project review and staff from
the different departments collaborate to identify
approaches to resolve the issues.
• The Application and Permit Center makes permit
processing more streamlined by enhancing coordination
of permitting services, including online application
submittal.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue monthly meetings with
various County departments to review applications that
require approvals or comments from more than one County
department. Continue reducing time and cost for processing
residential development applications to the greatest extent
possible.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -215
Funding Source: DCD, PWD, and HSD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD, PWD and HSD
Timeframe: Meet monthly and ongoing
HE-A6.3
Action: Continually monitor development impact fees
(transportation, drainage, park, etc.) and proposed
increases.
Background: The County collects fees on development to
mitigate impacts on infrastructure and services. Requiring
developers to construct site improvements and/or pay fees
toward the provision of infrastructure and services increases
the cost of housing development. While these costs may
impact housing affordability, these requirements are
deemed necessary to maintain the quality of life desired by
county residents and are consistent with the goals and
policies of the General Plan.
Eight-Year Objectives: Development impact fees that are
proportional to the cost of impacts and do not unnecessarily
hinder residential development.
Funding Source: DCD and PWD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD; PWD
Timeframe: Monitor fees every two years
HE-A6.4
Action: Establish processes to streamlining planning review of
small residential development applications.
Background: DCD has implemented a “fast-track” permitting
process for residential projects, such as small additions,
interior remodels, window replacement, new decks, that can
be reviewed and approved quickly. Applications for these
small projects are processed in approximately five business
days.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to implement programs to
complete small project application reviews within five days
of application submittal.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
Policies
HE-P7.1
Prohibit discrimination in the sale or rental of housing to
anyone on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin,
religion, disability, gender identity sexual orientation, familial
status, marital status, or other such arbitrary factors.
Goal HE-7
Promote equal opportunity for all residents to reside in the
housing of their choice.
6 -216 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
HE-P7.2
Provide financial support to non-profit organizations
providing fair housing services.
HE-P7.3
Enhance the opportunity for seniors, persons with disabilities,
large households, single parents, persons with HIV/AIDS,
persons with mental illness, and farmworkers to have access
to housing.
HE-P7.4
Ensure that housing programs prioritize the needs of
underserved communities, benefit lower-income residents,
and avoid gentrification as neighborhoods are improved.
Actions
HE-A7.1
Actions:
• Continue offering fair housing counseling and legal
services.
• Continue providing public outreach and education
regarding fair housing rights; specialized property owner,
management, and lender training; rental home seeking
and relocation services; and discrimination complaint
processing and investigation.
• Continue requiring housing developers that receive
County funding to submit a marketing plan detailing the
developer’s equal opportunity outreach program and
demonstrating efforts to reach those people who are
least likely to hear about affordable housing
opportunities.
• Continue to update the Analysis of Impediments (AI) to
Fair Housing Choice on the HUD required schedule.
• Implement the following previously identified (in earlier
actions in this section) actions to affirmatively further fair
housing:
o Place-based revitalization strategies: Action
HE-A2.4
o Strategies to facilitate housing mobility: HE-A2.1,
HE-A2.3, HE-A2.4, HE-A2.5, HE-A5.1, and HE-A6.1
o Strategies to expand affordable housing in high
resource areas: HE-A2.5, HE-A5.1, HE-A5.5, and HE-
A6.1
o Strategies to reduce or prevent displacement risk:
HE-A2.1, HE-A5.5, and HE-A7.2
• By December 2023, the County will identify community
groups and service providers in all disadvantaged
communities, and those at risk of gentrification if
different. By June 2024, the County will meet with each of
these groups or providers to identify community-based
partnerships and strategies to promote place-based
revitalization to improve living conditions through efforts
not related to development.
• By June 2023, ensure that fair housing information is
available in County buildings and on the County’s
website. Update materials annually, or as needed if more
frequent.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -217
• Promote the availability of multi-lingual resources by
ensuring that County-provided services and materials are
available in languages other than English or that they
make clear the availability of interpretation or translation
services. Translate materials and make materials
available by December 2024.
• Meet with school districts by January 2024 to determine
what, if any, outside factors impede student
performance in certain areas of the County that can be
alleviated, such as stable housing opportunities,
childcare opportunities for working parents or guardians,
and more. If a need for a specific program is identified,
the County will pursue solutions, which may include:
o Reviewing the County Ordinance Code to ensure
childcare facilities are permitted in close proximity
to schools and employment centers;
o Meeting with developers to identify sites suitable
and incentives to encourage development of
housing that is affordable on a teacher’s salary; or
o Supporting school applications for grants that may
be used for teacher recruitment and retention
bonuses, providing classroom materials, and other
similar incentives to attract high-quality teachers.
• Implement programs and policies identified throughout
the General Plan to affirmatively further fair housing and
overall conditions in disadvantaged communities
identified in the Assessment of Fair Housing.
• Working with the Housing Authority, implement a Housing
Choice Voucher (Section 8) education program to share
information about the program and available incentives
with rental property owners and managers as well as
training on avoiding discriminatory practices based on
income or other protected classes. Distribute this
information at least annually to property owners and
managers across the county, though with an emphasis
on areas in central and southern Contra Costa County
were there are no Public Housing opportunities available,
a disproportionately low rate of voucher usage, and high
performing schools.
• By December 2025, create an online resource, in multiple
languages, for tenants to understand their rights related
to Building Code standards, landlord and tenant
responsibilities, and how to request repairs or
improvements to their home, including information that is
specific to County housing and Code Enforcement
regulations.
Background: To promote fair housing, the County allocates
CDBG funds to local non-profit organizations for fair housing
counseling and legal services. Services offered typically
include advocacy and collaboration in support of fair
housing opportunities for all; public outreach and education
regarding fair housing rights; specialized property owner,
management, and lender training; rental home seeking and
relocation services; and discrimination complaint processing
and investigation.
All housing developers receiving financial assistance from the
County are required to submit a marketing plan detailing the
developer’s equal opportunity outreach program and
demonstrating efforts to reach those people who are least
likely to hear about affordable housing opportunities. Typical
outreach includes distributing informational flyers to social
service agencies, and housing authority offices.
Advertisements are placed in local newspapers and
publications in both English and prevalent non-English
languages.
6 -218 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
The Contra Costa Consortium has adopted the HUD-
mandated Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.
The AI includes a comprehensive review of the County’s
laws, regulations, and administrative policies; an assessment
of how those laws affect the location, availability, and
accessibility of housing; and an assessment of conditions,
both public and private, affecting fair housing choice.
Eight-Year Objectives: Affirmatively further fair housing.
Continue to support local non-profit organizations for fair
housing counseling and legal services. Carry out necessary
actions to address the impediments to fair housing choice
identified in the AI. See expected outcomes of actions
identified in the first bullet for AFFH objectives.
Funding Source: CDBG, General Fund
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD, Clerk-Recorder,
Workforce Development Board
Timeframe: Refer to each strategy in the affirmatively
furthering fair housing (AFFH) program for metrics and
specific milestones.
HE-A7.2
Action: Prioritize projects that will not involve permanent
relocation of residents, offer first right to return if temporary
relocation is unavoidable.
Background: In allocating affordable housing funds, the
County assigns priority to projects that do not involve
permanent relocation (displacement). However, projects
involving relocation may be funded if required to eliminate
unsafe or hazardous housing conditions, reverse conditions of
neighborhood decline, stimulate revitalization of a specific
area, and/or accomplish high-priority affordable housing
projects. In such situations, the County monitors projects to
ensure that relocation consistent with federal and state
requirements is provided. Wherever feasible, displaced
households and organizations are offered the opportunity to
relocate into the affordable housing project upon
completion.
In accordance with California Government Code Section
65583.2(g), the County will require replacement housing units
subject to the requirements of California Government Code
Section 65915(c)(3) on sites identified in the sites inventory
when any new development (residential, mixed-use, or
nonresidential) occurs on a site that has been occupied by
or restricted for the use of lower-income households at any
time during the previous five years.
This requirement applies to:
• Non-vacant sites
• Vacant sites with previous residential uses that have
been vacated or demolished.
Eight-Year Objectives: Prevent permanent relocation, to the
extent practicable, to reduce displacement risk and comply
with state law regarding replacement housing units.
Funding Source: HOME, CDBG
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -219
Policies
HE-P8.1
Participate in State and Bay Area regional efforts to reduce
energy consumption.
HE-P8.2
Encourage healthy indoor air quality and noise levels in
existing and new housing. Support efforts to retrofit existing
housing units with multi-paned windows, air filtration systems,
low-emission building materials, equipment and appliances,
and other improvements that reduce indoor air and noise
pollution while at the same time working to improve energy
efficiency.
HE-P8.3
Locate below market-rate housing developments outside of
mapped hazard zones as identified in the Health and Safety
Element.
Actions
HE-A8.1
Action: Continue to participate in regional programs and
activities and increase installed solar capacity.
Background: Contra Costa County is actively involved in
regional energy conservation and sustainable development
activities. It is a member of the Bay Area Regional Energy
Network, which provides rebates and incentives for energy
conservation. The County has streamlined the permitting
process for solar panels by creating a checklist that includes
the required elements to process a permit application. The
application and instructions are also available on the
County’s website.
Eight-Year Objectives: Continue to participate in regional
programs and activities. Increase installed solar capacity
countywide. Continue to provide expedited rooftop solar
permitting.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Ongoing
HE-A8.2
Action: Adopt and implement Updated Climate Action Plan.
Background: The most recent update to the County’s
Climate Action Plan was adopted in December 2015, the
Board of Supervisors adopted a Climate Action Plan. The
2015 CAP included sections covering the scientific and
regulatory environment, an updated GHG inventory and
forecast, a GHG reduction strategy for community-wide
emissions, and implementation plan.
The County is currently preparing the 2022 Climate Action
Plan Update to build on the legacy of its prior efforts by
including an updated estimate of the County’s energy use
and GHG emissions, updated emissions reductions and
Goal HE-8
Promote energy-efficient retrofits of existing dwellings and
exceeding building code requirements in new construction.
6 -220 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
implementation and monitoring strategies, and a discussion
of climate change impacts relevant to Contra Costa
County. The 2022 CAP will identify energy efficiency and
conservation and GHG reduction strategies that benefit
residents through and beyond 2050, consistent with the
State’s goals and programs to achieve statewide net carbon
neutrality and carbon free energy by 2045.
Eight-Year Objectives: Implement Climate Action Plan
components related to housing.
Funding Source: DCD
Responsible Agency/Department: DCD
Timeframe: Adopt Updated Climate Action Plan by 2024.
B. RELATED PLANS
In addition to the Housing Element, the goals and policies presented earlier
are implemented through a series of housing programs offered primarily
through the County Department of Conservation and Development (DCD),
the County’s Health Services Department, and the Housing Authority of
Contra Costa County. The following plans prepared by these agencies help
define the County’s overall housing strategy presented in this H ousing Plan.
1. Contra Costa Consortium Consolidated
Plan
The Consolidated Planning process for the Contra Costa Consortium is
managed by DCD. The Consolidated Plan outlines the Consortium’s
objectives and strategy for meeting its housing and community development
needs using CDBG, HOME, NSP, ESG, and HOPWA funds.
For CDBG and ESG funds, programs are available to the Urban County,
including the unincorporated areas, and the cities and towns of Brentwood,
Clayton, Danville, El Cerrito, Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley,
Orinda, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, and San Ramon. HOME-funded
programs are available to the Contra Costa Consortium, including the Urban
County and the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek.
HOPWA-funded activities are available to all jurisdictions in the County.
The funds provided by these programs can be used for new affordable
rental housing, home-buyer assistance, rehabilitation assistance, supportive
housing assisstance, public facilities improvements, and can be used to
provide a variety of services for lower-income families and individuals, and
unhoused persons.
The 2020-2025 Consortium Consolidated Plan outlines four priority needs
for the entire County, including: affordable housing, reduction and alleviation
of homelessness, non-housing community development, and strengthening
of partne rships between all levels of government and the private sector. The
updated plan notes that through the first four years of the consolidated
plan, 12 of the previous goals have been met, including providing social
services and housing to 62,000 county residents and households, the
construction of 188 rental units , and the rehabilitation of 149 rental units
countywide .
2. Contra Costa Council on Homelessness/
Continuum of Care Strategy
The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness (CCCH) serves as the County’s
Continuum of Care Board, and includes non-profit community and advocacy
groups, the interfaith community, business organizations, and other relevant
community groups. Its purpose is to implement key strategies identified in
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element 6 -221
the five -year Continuum of Care Plan and the Ten-Year Plan to End
Homelessness. The Council is responsible for approving funding allocations
for proposed projects and monitoring and tracking performance and
compliance in coordination with the Council on Homelessness and HMIS
Lead Agency. Contra Costa Continuum of Care Plan identifies priorities and
strategies for meeting the housing and service needs of homeless and at-risk
populations throughout the c ounty. The Plan addresses gaps in existing
facilities and services for homeless households and includes strategies with
priorities to expand capacity in the following areas: homeless prevention,
outreach and assessment activities; emergency shelter, transitional housing,
and permanent housing affordable to extremely low income and unhoused
households; and supportive service needs. The County’s Ten-Year Plan to
End Homelessness includes priorities to address three types of unhoused
populations: the chronically unhoused, those discharged into homelessness,
and the transitionally (or episodic) unhoused people. This will include
programs and projects to increase income and employment opportunities
for homeless households, expand needed support services and programs to
prevent homelessness, and increase the availability of housing affordable to
extremely-low income households and homeless persons.
3. Public Housing Agency Plan
The Housing Authority of Contra Costa County (HACCC) owns and operates
the County’s public housing projects and administers the Section 8 Rental
Assistance program for County residents. HACCC prepares a five-year Public
Housing Agency Plan (PHAP) and an annual Action Plan, which identifies
strategies and actions to maintain and improve the public housing stock,
expand the availability and use of Section 8 assistance throughout the
County, and improve overall program administration.
TABLE 6-39 QUANTIFIED EIGHT-YEAR OBJECTIVES
Activity Extremely Low
Income
Very Low
Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Income Total
New Construction 1,036 1,036 1,194 1,211 3,133 7,610
Rehabilitation 169 189 192 20 20 590
Acquisition/Preservation1 51 66 66 0 0 183
1. The new construction objectives are the same as the County’s RHNA.
2. The units under the rehabilitation objective are addressed by Actions HE-A1.1, HE-A1.2, HE-A1.3,HE-A1.4, and HE-A2.4
3. The units to be preserved are addressed by Action HE-A1.5
6 -222 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Housing Element
This page intentionally left blank.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -1
A. A PPENDIX A: S ITES I NVENTORY
Sites Inventory Maps
A -2 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -3
A -4 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -5
A -6 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -7
A -8 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -9
A -10 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -11
A -12 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -13
A -14 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -15
A -16 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -17
A -18 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -19
A -20 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -21
Sites to Address the Lower Income RHNA
A -22 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 1: APPIAN WAY CHURCH-OWNED SITE
Parcel Number(s) 426261060
Street Appian Way at Sobrante Ave. and Valley View Rd.
Site Size (acres) 0.87 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 13 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Mostly underutilized site with large parking lot and vacant buildings. Doesn't allow 100% residential development.
Assuming 60% residential based on proposed General Plan Land Use Designation description.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -23
SITE 2: SAN PABLO DAM ROAD OLD GAS STATION
Parcel Number(s) 420010001 and 420010002
Street San Pablo Dam Rd. near Pitt Way
Site Size (acres) 1.58 acres total; 420010001: 0.39 acres and 420010002: 1.19 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant One parcel vacant and the other non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 39 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site?
Yes – small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites.
In addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller
sites.
Both parcels have the same owner. Mostly vacant site with a vacant boarded up old gas station site on the street. San
Pablo Creek runs across the back end of the site so no development would occur in that area.
A -24 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 3: FORMER NURSERY SITE
Parcel Number(s) 425252064
Street Sobrante Ave. and Valley View Rd. at Shirley Vista St.
Site Size (acres) 1.33 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 20 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Non-vacant but the use is abandoned. Appears the former use was as a nursery. Doesn't allow 100% residential
development. Assuming 60% residential based on proposed General Plan Land Use Designation description.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -25
SITE 4: APPIAN WAY AND LA PALOMA ROAD
Parcel Number(s) 425210037 and 425210039
Street Appian Way across from La Paloma Rd.
Site Size (acres) 1.81 acres total; 425210037: 0.90 acres and 425210039: 0.91 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant One vacant and one non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 45 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 1
Small or Large Site? No
Both parcels have the same owner. Underutilized with one existing residential unit and otherwise vacant or in use for
storage.
A -26 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 5: APPIAN WAY AT CORTE ARANGO
Parcel Number(s) 425230017, 425230036, 425230037, 425230038
Street 4782, 4820, 4826, and 2800 Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 2.72 acres total; 425230017: 0.89 acres, 425230036: 0.47 acres,
425230037: 0.45 acres, 425230038: 0.91 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 67 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 3
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Site is underutilized with residences/structures along Appian Way and a lot of flat undeveloped land behind. These 4 parcels
are adjacent and have the same owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -27
SITE 6: APPIAN WAY AT SUNHILL CIRCLE
Parcel Number(s) 425240041
Street Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 1.68 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 42 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant with a fair number of trees.
A -28 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 7: NEAR SAN PABLO DAM ROAD AND PITT WAY
Parcel Number(s) 420192037 and 420192043
Street San Pablo Dam Road
Site Size (acres) 1.23 acres total; 420192037: 0.76 acres, 420192043: 0.47 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 30 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
The parcels are adjacent with the same owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -29
SITE 8: APPIAN WAY NEAR SANTA RITA ROAD
Parcel Number(s) 425210044 and 425210045
Street Santa Rita Road and Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 1.53 acres total; 425210044: 0.33 acres, 425210045: 1.30 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 41 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
The two parcels are adjacent and have the same owner. Adjacent to Site 9.
A -30 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 9: 4462 APPIAN WAY
Parcel Number(s) 425210042
Street 4462 Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 0.91 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 23 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel. Adjacent to Site 8.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -31
SITE 10: APPIAN WAY AND SAN PABLO DAM ROAD
Parcel Number(s) 425170030
Street 4150 Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 0.77 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 19 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
A -32 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 11: SAN PABLO DAM ROAD NEAR EL PORTAL DRIVE
Parcel Number(s) 420140003
Street San Pablo Dam Road
Site Size (acres) 2.12 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Retail Business
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning R-80
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 54 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -33
SITE 12: HILLCREST ROAD AND PITT WAY
Parcel Number(s) 420150030, 420150033 and 420184015
Street 3900 Hillcrest Road
Site Size (acres) 4.16 acres total; 420150030: 0.45 acres, 420184015: 2.78 acres,
420150033: 0.93 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 81 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These parcels all have the same owner.
A -34 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 13: APPIAN WAY NEAR PEBBLE DRIVE
Parcel Number(s) 425100056
Street 4653 Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 0.56 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 14 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -35
SITE 14: 4TH STREET NEAR GROVE AVENUE
Parcel Number(s) 409100004
Street Fifth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.58 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 6 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 6
Small or Large Site? No
There are abandoned houses on this site. All parcels are owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority.
A -36 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 15: END OF 6TH STREET
Parcel Number(s) 409292001
Street Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.61 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 13 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 8
Small or Large Site? No
All of these parcels are owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority. The site contains some abandoned houses.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -37
SITE 16: CARMEN LANE
Parcel Number(s) 431010010 and 431010011
Street 11 and 49 Carmen Lane
Site Size (acres) 1.05 acres total; 431010010: 0.79 acres, 431010011: 0.26 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 26 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These parcels are non-vacant but one of the parcels is underutilized. Both parcels have the same owner.
A -38 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 17: SOLANO AVE. NEAR ALFARO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096043002
Street 178 Solano Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.64 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 16 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? No
This parcel is non-vacant but very underutilized.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -39
SITE 18: DANVILLE BLVD. AND CASA MARIA CT.
Parcel Number(s) 197010013, 197010014, 197010016
Street 20, 40, and 50 Casa Maria Court
Site Size (acres) 0.71 acres total; 197010013: 0.23 acres, 197010014: 0.24 acres,
197010016: 0.24 acres
Community Alamo
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential
Current Zoning Multiple Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 17 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 12
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
All of these parcels are adjacent to one another and have the same owner.
A -40 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 19: POINSETTIA AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096044001, 096044009, 096044010, and 096050007
Street Suisun Avenue and 164 Poinsettia Avenue
Site Size (acres) 2.18 acres total; 096044001: 0.42 acres, 096044009: 0.33 acres,
096044010: 0.34 acres, 096050007: 1.09 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 50 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
The existing use on these parcels is car storage. They have the same owner and are catty corner to each other.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -41
SITE 20: WILLOW PASS RD. AT BELLA VISTA AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 095081020 and 095081023
Street 29 Bella Vista Avenue and 2239 Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 1.49 acres total; 095081020: 0.77 acres, 095081023: 0.71 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan 095081020: Single Family Residential, 095081023: Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 68 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? No
These parcels are non-vacant, but underutilized. There are two houses on the parcels, a couple of small structures, and
RVs. The parcels are adjacent and have the same owner.
A -42 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 21: NORTH RICHMOND CLUSTER OF HOUSING AUTHORITY SITES
Parcel Number(s) 408160016, 409210011, 409210020, 409210021, 409210022,
409210023, 409210024, 409210025, 409210026
Street Market Avenue, Silver Avenue, 135 W Grove Avenue, First Street, N
Jade Street, Market Avenue
Site Size (acres)
11.50 acres total; 408160016: 0.16 acres, 409210011: 0.53 acres,
409210020: 0.67 acres, 409210021: 1.37 acres, 409210022: 2.16 acres,
409210023: 3.03 acres, 409210024: 1.28 acres, 409210025: 0.70 acres,
409210026: 1.60 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan 408160016: Single Family Residential, all other parcels: Multiple Family
Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -43
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant 1 non-vacant parcel, the rest vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 228 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
This set of parcels is known as Las Deltas and all parcels are owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority. Nearly
all parcels are vacant except for the parcel with the community center which will remain with development of a new
project.
A -44 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 22: N. BROADWAY AVE. AND ALFARO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096041001, 096041013, 096041026
Street 187, 195, and 199 N Broadway Avenue
Site Size (acres) 1.06 acres total; 096041001: 0.33 acres, 096041013: 0.35 acres,
096041026: 0.37 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 26 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These three adjacent parcels could be consolidated, and they are all owned by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment
Agency.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -45
SITE 23: SOUTHWOOD DRIVE
Parcel Number(s) 403020013, 403020009, 403482043
Street Cypress Avenue
Site Size (acres) 7.91 acres total; 403020013: 0.59 acres, 403020009: 2.77 acres,
403482043: 4.55 acres
Community Bay View
Current General Plan Public Semi-Public
Current Zoning 403020013 and 403020009: Area Wide Planned Unit, 403482043:
Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 201 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
These three adjacent parcels could be consolidated. All are owned by West Contra Costa Unified School District.
A -46 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 24: POINSETTIA AVE. AND WILLOW PASS RD.
Parcel Number(s) 096033037 and 096033039
Street 15 Poinsettia Avenue and 2544 Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 0.50 acres total; 096033037: 0.15 acres, 096033039: 0.35 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan 096033037: Single Family Residential, 096033039: Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant One vacant and one non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 26 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These parcels have the same owner and are adjacent.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -47
SITE 25: SAPONE LANE
Parcel Number(s) 095021002
Street 77 Sapone Lane
Site Size (acres) 0.57 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 14 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel. This is a repeat site from the 4th and 5th Cycle Housing Elements.
A -48 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 26: N. BROADWAY AVE. NEAR ALFARO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096050011
Street 210 N Broadway Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.80 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 20 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -49
SITE 27: BEL AIR LANE
Parcel Number(s) 093170056
Street 190 Bel Aire Lane
Site Size (acres) 0.56 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential High– 30 to 70
Proposed Zoning M-60
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 70
Realistic Units 33 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
This is owned by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency.
A -50 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 28: PARKER AVE. BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND STREETS
Parcel Number(s) 357171019, 357171008, 357171020
Street 185 Parker Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.39 acres total; 357171019: 0.11 acres, 357171008: 0.23 acres,
357171020: 0.04 acres
Community Rodeo
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant One vacant and two non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 23 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
The non-vacant parcel is underutilized and contains a small structure and paved area. Parcels are adjacent with the same
owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -51
SITE 29: FRED JACKSON WAY AND MARKET AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409191001
Street 308 Market Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.35 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 4 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There are abandoned houses on this site. Owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority.
A -52 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 30: 1730 FRED JACKSON WAY
Parcel Number(s) 409191013
Street 1730 Fred Jackson Way
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 1 lower-income unit
Existing residential units on site 1
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Contains one abandoned house and at least one occupied house. Owned by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -53
SITE 31: SAN PABLO AVE. AT TARA HILLS DR.
Parcel Number(s) 403211027
Street 16330 San Pablo Avenue
Site Size (acres) 3.63 acres
Community Montalvin Manor
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 57 moderate-income units and 174 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Existing use is an underutilized older strip mall.
A -54 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 32: 7TH ST. AT RODEO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 357120002 and 357120003
Street No address
Site Size (acres) 1.44 acres total; 357120002: 0.65 acres, 357120003: 0.79 acres,
Community Rodeo
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 91 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Existing use is a junk yard.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -55
SITE 33: 7TH ST. AND CHESLEY AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409132007
Street 699 Chesley Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.51 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 32 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Most of the parcel is vacant and the one existing building is not in good condition.
A -56 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 34: SAN PABLO AVE. NEAR SKYLINE
Parcel Number(s) 403211024
Street San Pablo Avenue
Site Size (acres) 1.69 acres
Community Montalvin Manor
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 26 moderate-income units and 81 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -57
SITE 35: TARA HILLS DR. AND SAN PABLO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 403211026
Street San Pablo Avenue
Site Size (acres) 1.14 acres
Community Montalvin Manor
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 18 moderate-income units and 54 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
A -58 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 36: 1ST ST. AND PARKER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 357171010
Street 111 Parker Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.42 acres
Community Rodeo
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 26 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Not adjacent to other parcels with same owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -59
SITE 37: WILLOW PASS RD. NEAR CLEARLAND DR.
Parcel Number(s) 093081027, 093081028, 093081029
Street Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 1.81 acres total; 093081027: 0.52 acres, 093081028: 0.52 acres,
093081029: 0.77 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? No
Proposed General Plan Land Use N/A
Proposed Zoning N/A
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 122 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Pending project on this site. All three parcels have the same owner. Unit estimates are based on the pending project.
A -60 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 38: PARKER AVE. AT INVESTMENT ST.
Parcel Number(s) 357161001, 357161002, 357161013
Street 223 Parker Avenue and Railroad Avenue
Site Size (acres) 1.29 acres total: 357161001: 0.22 acres, 357161002: 0.17 acres,
357161013: 0.90 acres
Community Rodeo
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 80 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These three parcels could be consolidated. They are all owned by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -61
SITE 39: PACHECO COMMUNITY CENTER SITE
Parcel Number(s) 125130018 and 125130020
Street 5780 Pacheco Boulevard
Site Size (acres) 0.98 acres total: 125130018: 0.79 acres, 125130020: 0.19 acres
Community Pacheco
Current General Plan Public Semi-Public
Current Zoning Retail Business
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 61 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
This is an underutilized site that includes the Pacheco Community Center. This site is owned by Contra Costa County.
A -62 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 40: N. BROADWAY AVE. NEAR WILLOW PASS RD.
Parcel Number(s) 096032011, 096032016, 096032028
Street 14 N Broadway Avenue and 2640 Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 0.55 acres total; 096032011: 0.12 acres, 096032016: 0.12 acres,
096032028: 0.31 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan 096032011 and 096032016: Multiple Family Residential, 096032028:
Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 24 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These parcels are adjacent and share the same owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -63
SITE 41: ALBERTS AVE. AND WILLOW PASS RD.
Parcel Number(s) 093036010, 093036014, 093036015
Street 78 and 96 Alberts Avenue and 3515 Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 1.81 acres total; 093036010: 0.21 acres, 093036014: 0.37 acres,
093036015: 1.23 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 50 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
These parcels are adjacent and share the same owner.
A -64 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 42: RICHMOND UNION HIGH SCHOOL SITE
Parcel Number(s) 520032002, 520042013, 520050001, 520062001, 520070004
Street Loring Avenue, Arlington Boulevard, Patterson Circle, Yale Avenue
Site Size (acres) 9.16 acres total; 520032002: 1.09 acres, 520042013: 0.96 acres,
520050001: 3.42 acres, 520062001: 1.59 acres, 520070004: 2.10 acres
Community East Richmond Heights
Current General Plan Public Semi-Public
Current Zoning Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 50 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
All five parcels are adjacent and are parking lots or underutilized. The school on this site is closed. They are all owned by
the West Contra Costa Unified School District. These sites don't allow 100% residential development, so realistic units on
the site assume 60% of development is residential.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -65
SITE 43: WILLOW PASS RD. AND SOLANO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096032032
Street Willow Pass Road
Site Size (acres) 0.92 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 14 moderate-income units and 44 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant parcel
A -66 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 44: MIMS AVENUE
Parcel Number(s) 093170069
Street 81 Mims Avenue
Site Size (acres) 1.41 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 75 to 125
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 75 to 125
Realistic Units 105 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 1
Small or Large Site? No
Near the BART station.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -67
SITE 45: CANAL ROAD
Parcel Number(s) 093170018, 093170021, 093170022, 093170076, 093170078,
093170080
Street 231 and 235 Amerson Avenue and Canal Road
Site Size (acres)
0.90 acres total; 093170018: 0.12 acres, 093170021: 0.13 acres,
093170022: 0.13 acres, 093170076: 0.06 acres, 093170078: 0.19 acres,
093170080: 0.27 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan 093170080: Mixed Use, all other parcels: Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 75 to 125
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 75 to 125
Realistic Units 65 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Near the BART station and owned by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. These parcels are adjacent and
have the same owner.
A -68 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 46: MIMS AVE. AND CANAL RD.
Parcel Number(s) 093170071
Street Mims Ave.
Site Size (acres) 0.53 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 75 to 125
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 75 to 125
Realistic Units 39 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Near the BART station.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -69
SITE 47: BIXLER ROAD AT REGATTA DRIVE
Parcel Number(s) 011220039
Street Bixler Road
Site Size (acres) 6.42 acres
Community Discovery Bay
Current General Plan Office
Current Zoning Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 4 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? No
This parcel has had developer interest. The realistic units are based on developer interest.
A -70 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 48: DISCOVERY BAY BLVD.
Parcel Number(s) 008010039
Street Discovery Bay Blvd.
Site Size (acres) 4.60 acres
Community Discovery Bay
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 94 above moderate-income units, 13 moderate-income units, 3 lower-
income units
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? No
Realistic units are based on developer interest
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -71
SITE 49: N. BROADWAY AVE NEAR PULLMAN AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096031018
Street No address
Site Size (acres) 0.62 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential – Low Density
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential High – 30 to 70
Proposed Zoning M-60
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 70
Realistic Units 18 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 1
Small or Large Site? No
Most of the parcel is vacant or is used as storage. There is also one existing residential unit. This parcel is adjacent to APN
096031019, and it has the same owner.
A -72 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 50: N. BROADWAY AVE NEAR W SIINO AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 096031019
Street No address
Site Size (acres) 1.02 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential – Low Density
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential High – 30 to 70
Proposed Zoning M-60
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 70
Realistic Units 30 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 3
Small or Large Site? No
Most of the parcel is vacant or is used as storage. There are also three existing residential units. This parcel is adjacent to
APN 096031018 and has the same owner.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -73
SITE 51: 2ND ST. AND W. RUBY ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409052001
Street Second Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -74 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 52: CHESLEY AVE. AND 2ND ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409052003
Street 121 Chesley Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -75
SITE 53: 1ST ST. AND W. RUBY ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409052009
Street First Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -76 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 54: 2ND ST. NEAR GROVE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409060009
Street Second Street
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -77
SITE 55: 1ST ST. NEAR W. RUBY ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409060018
Street First Street
Site Size (acres) 0.35 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 4 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -78 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 56: GIARAMITA ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409110007
Street 1525 Giaramita Street
Site Size (acres) 0.19 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -79
SITE 57: 6TH ST. AND GROVE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409120005
Street 1547 Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.18 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -80 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 58: 6TH ST. NEAR SILVER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409131003
Street 1722 Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -81
SITE 59: SIXTH ST. NEAR GROVE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409141006
Street 1639 Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.18 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -82 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 60: GIARAMITA ST. AT SILVER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409142005
Street Giaramita Street
Site Size (acres) 0.49 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 5 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 5
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -83
SITE 61: SIXTH ST. NEAR MARKET AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409151005
Street 1741 Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -84 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 62: GIARAMITA ST. AND SILVER AVE. – NE CORNER
Parcel Number(s) 409151011
Street 1710 Giaramita Street
Site Size (acres) 0.11 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 1 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -85
SITE 63: GIARAMITA ST. AND SILVER AVE. – NW CORNER
Parcel Number(s) 409152007
Street Silver Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -86 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 64: 4TH ST. AND MARKET AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409161001
Street 1744 Fourth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.11 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 1 lower-income unit
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -87
SITE 65: 5TH ST. AND SILVER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409161008
Street Silver Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -88 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 66: 4TH ST. NEAR SILVER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409162018
Street Fourth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -89
SITE 67: 4TH ST. NEAR GROVE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409171015
Street 1622 Fourth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.24 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -90 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 68: SILVER AVE. NEAR 2ND ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409182002
Street 218 Silver Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.26 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -91
SITE 69: SILVER AVE. NEAR FRED JACKSON WAY
Parcel Number(s) 409191009
Street 317 Silver Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -92 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 70: 1ST ST. NEAR SILVER AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409200016
Street 1710 First Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -93
SITE 71: TRUMAN ST. NEAR VERDE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409251022
Street 1840 Truman Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -94 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 72: VERDE AVE. NEAR TRUMAN ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409252008
Street Verde Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.19 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -95
SITE 73: GIARAMITA ST. NEAR VERDE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409272009
Street 1927 Giaramita Street
Site Size (acres) 0.23 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 7 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -96 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 74: VERDE AVE. AT GIARAMITA ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409281001
Street 542 Verde Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.40 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 4 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -97
SITE 75: 7TH ST. NEAR MARKET AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409282005
Street 1817 Seventh Street
Site Size (acres) 0.34 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 4 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -98 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 76: MARKET AVE. AT 6TH ST.
Parcel Number(s) 409282019
Street 611 Market Avenue
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -99
SITE 77: 6TH ST. NEAR VERDE AVE.
Parcel Number(s) 409291009
Street 1932 Sixth Street
Site Size (acres) 0.17 acres
Community North Richmond
Current General Plan Single Family Residential
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 2 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 2
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
There is developer interest, and the owner is willing to sell the site. The Housing Authority owns this site and has a track
record of selling similar sites.
A -100 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 78: MCAVOY SITE
Parcel Number(s) 098250013
Street No address
Site Size (acres) 256.18 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Parks Watersheds and Open Space
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 500 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - large
Unit assumptions are based on an older lapsed approval for residential development on this site. Other sites larger than
10 acres in the County have successfully subdivided and resulted in multifamily housing projects. Examples include Park
Regency, Hilltop Commons and Avalon Bay Apartments. This site is within the County’s Urban Limit Line. For wastewater
service for this site an amendment to the Delta Diablo Sanitation District sphere of influence would be needed and then
it would need annexed into the sanitation district. There is recent precedent for this when Delta Diablo Sanitation District
annexed a Park District in the same area and pulled a pipe over the railroad tracks.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -101
SITE 79: RAY LANE
Parcel Number(s) 093121001
Street No address
Site Size (acres) 10.99 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Single Family Residential – High Density
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? No
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 224 above moderate-income units, 32 moderate-income units, 8 lower-
income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? Yes - large
Underutilized site that contains a church parking lot. A County Supervisor is interested in seeing this site developed with
housing. Adjacent to APN 197030027.
A -102 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 80: CREEKSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OWNED PROPERTIES
Parcel Number(s) 197030026 and 197030027
Street Danville Blvd.
Site Size (acres) 6.29 acres total; 197030026: 5.68 acres, 197030027: 0.61 acres
Community Alamo
Current General Plan Single Family Residential – Low Density
Current Zoning Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 80 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Underutilized site that contains a church, church parking lot and vacant lot.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -103
SITE 81: ORBISONIA HEIGHTS
Parcel Number(s)
094012021, 094012022, 094012023, 094012024, 094012025,
094012026, 094012027, 094012030, 094012031, 094012032,
094012033, 094012038, 094012039, 094012040, 094013001,
094013002, 094013003, 094013004, 094013005, 094013006,
094013012, 094013013, 094013014, 094013015, 094013016,
094014001, 094014010, 094014011, 094014012, 094014013,
094014014, 094015006, 094015010, 094015011, 094015012,
094015013, 094015014, 094015027, 094015028, 094016002,
094026001, 094026002, 094026007, 094026008
Street Bailey Road
Site Size (acres)
6.63 acres total (the parcels that make up this site are similar in size
ranging from .10 to .30 in size. Acreage for each parcel can be found
later in Appendix A where the full list of sites is provided)
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Bay Point Residential Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? No
Proposed General Plan Land Use N/A
A -104 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
Proposed Zoning N/A
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed or Allowed Density (units per acre) 21 to 29.9
Realistic Units 384
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? No
Entitled project. Units are based on approved project.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -105
SITE 82: APPIAN WAY NEAR SUNHILL CIRCLE
Parcel Number(s) 425200006 and 425230035
Street Appian Way
Site Size (acres) 5.06 acres total; 425200006: 3.12 acres, 425230035: 1.94 acres
Community El Sobrante
Current General Plan Multiple Family Residential – Low Density and Appian Way General
Mixed Use
Current Zoning Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 0 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant One vacant and one non-vacant parcel
Proposed Density (units per acre) 0 to 30
Realistic Units 126 lower income units
Existing residential units on site 1
Small or Large Site? No
Two adjacent parcels – one is vacant and one is underutilized. Both parcels have the same owner.
A -106 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 83: ST. ANNE VILLAGE
Parcel Number(s) 003120008 and 003120009
Street Camino Diablo Road
Site Size (acres) 10.02 acres total; 003120008: 4.94 acres, 003120009: 5.08 acres
Community Byron
Current General Plan Single-Family Residential - Medium Density
Current Zoning Single-Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 157 above-moderate income units, 21 moderate-income units, and 6
lower-income units
Existing residential units on site
Small or Large Site? No
Potential project on this site. St. Anne Village senior housing. Units are based on the potential project. Existing use is
agriculture. Access to water infrastructure has been secured as part of the pre-planning for the project.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -107
SITE 84: DISCOVERY BAY MIXED USE
Parcel Number(s) 004182006
Street Discovery Bay Boulevard
Site Size (acres) 9.52 acres
Community Discovery Bay
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 2 above-moderate income units and 168 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? No
Site is mostly vacant land or paved parking lot. Two existing non-residential structures on the site. There is a pending
project on this site. The units are based on that pending project.
A -108 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 85: PACHECO BLVD
Parcel Number(s) 159210039, 159210042, 159210043, and 159210004
Street Pacheco Boulevard
Site Size (acres) 6.51 acres total; 159210039: 1.05 acres, 159210042: 4.33 acres,
159210043: 0.87 acres, 159210004: 0.26 acres
Community Vine Hill
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning 3 parcels – Retail Business; 1 parcel Multiple Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 30 to 75
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 75
Realistic Units 234 above-moderate income units, 33 moderate-income units, and 8
lower-income units
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -109
Site is underutilized and is mostly made up of vacant land and parking lot. There are a few non-residential structures on
the site. All four parcels have the same owner. There is a pending project on this site. The units are based on that
pending project.
A -110 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 86: LAS JUNTAS WAY AND OAK ROAD
Parcel Number(s) 148221033
Street Las Juntas Way
Site Size (acres) 1.81 acres
Community Walnut Creek
Current General Plan Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Mixed Use – 75 to 125
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 75 to 125
Realistic Units 48 moderate-income units and 144 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site No
Small or Large Site? No
Existing use is an office building. Two developers have approached the County about redeveloping this property for
housing and the property has recently been for sale.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -111
SITE 87: CHERRY LANE
Parcel Number(s) 148350009, 148350010, 148350011, 148350020
Street Cherry Lane
Site Size (acres) 3.73 acres total; 148350009: 0.45 acres, 148350010: 0.48 acres,
148350011: 1.01 acres, 148350020: 1.79 acres
Community Walnut Creek
Current General Plan Single-Family Residential - Medium Density
Current Zoning Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential High
Proposed Zoning M-60
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 60
Realistic Units 184 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 4
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Existing use is very low density residential.
A -112 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 88: KINGSTON PLACE
Parcel Number(s)
172120002, 172120003, 172120004, 172120005, 172120006,
172120007, 172120008, 172120009, 172120010, 172120011,
172120012, 172120013, 172120025, 172120027, 172120028,
172120051, 172120052
Street Kingston Place
Site Size (acres)
5.91 acres total; 172120002: 0.35 acres, 172120003: 0.35 acres,
172120004: 0.34 acres, 172120005: 0.35 acres, 172120006: 0.35 acres,
172120007: 0.35 acres, 172120008: 0.35 acres, 172120009: 0.35 acres,
172120010: 0.35 acres, 172120011: 0.35 acres, 172120012: 0.34 acres,
172120013: 0.34 acres, 172120025: 0.33 acres, 172120027: 0.36 acres,
172120028: 0.37 acres, 172120051: 0.34 acres, 172120052: 0.35 acres
Community Walnut Creek
Current General Plan Multiple-Family Residential - High Density
Current Zoning Single Family Residential
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Very High
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -113
Proposed Density (units per acre) 70 to 125
Realistic Units 602 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 17
Small or Large Site? Yes - small. The County has a track record of developing smaller sites. In
addition, Action HE-A5.5 will support the development of smaller sites.
Existing use is low density residential. The owners of these properties have requested rezoning to higher density from the
County and are interested in redeveloping their street with high density affordable units. All parcels are adjacent to each
other on Kingston Place.
A -114 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 89: MAUZY SCHOOL
Parcel Number(s) 172120002, 17212000
Street 2964 Miranda Ave.
Site Size (acres) 7.74 acres
Community Walnut Creek
Current General Plan Public and Semi-Public
Current Zoning R-20
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use PS
Proposed Zoning M-60
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 30 to 60
Realistic Units 10 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Existing use is a special needs school. The school is interested in building affordable housing onsite for its students.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory A -115
SITE 90: CRESTWOOD DR.
Parcel Number(s) 405203018
Street Crestwood Dr.
Site Size (acres) 0.73 acres
Community San Pablo
Current General Plan Single-Family Residential – High Density
Current Zoning Retail Business
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-30
Vacant or Non-Vacant Vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 17 to 30
Realistic Units 18 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 0
Small or Large Site? No
Vacant site.
A -116 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix A: Sites Inventory
SITE 91: FAR HILLS MOBILE HOME PARK
Parcel Number(s) 095010010
Street Bailey Dr.
Site Size (acres) 6.97 acres
Community Bay Point
Current General Plan Commercial
Current Zoning Area Wide Planned Unit
Rezoning or Change to Land Use Required? Yes
Proposed General Plan Land Use Residential Medium-High – 17 to 30
Proposed Zoning M-125
Vacant or Non-Vacant Non-vacant
Proposed Density (units per acre) 75 to 125
Realistic Units 650 lower-income units
Existing residential units on site 90
Small or Large Site? No
Existing mobile home park. Owner is interested in redeveloping with high density affordable housing. Owner of Mobile
Home Park is aware of and will comply with relocation laws.
Table A: Housing Element Sites InventoryJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityCONTRA COSTA COUNTY093081027Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.52 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Pending ProjectNot Used in Prior Housing Element46.01.0 47CONTRA COSTA COUNTY093081028Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.52 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Pending ProjectNot Used in Prior Housing Element30.030CONTRA COSTA COUNTY093081029Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.77 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Pending ProjectNot Used in Prior Housing Element46.01.0 47CONTRA COSTA COUNTY093160005Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.24 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY093160006Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.27 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012021Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012022Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012023Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012024Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012025Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012026Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012027Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012030Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.10 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012031Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012032Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012033Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012038Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012039Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.15 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094012040Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013001Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013002Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013003Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013004Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013005Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013006Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013012Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013013Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.18 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013014Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013015Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094013016Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.10 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014001Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014010Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.19 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014011Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014012Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014013Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094014014Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015006Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015010Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015011Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015012Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015013Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015014Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.15 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015027Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.30 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094015028Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.21 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094016002Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles11.011CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094026001Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles7.07CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094026002Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094026007Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY094026008Bay Point Residential Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential YES - County-Owned Pending ProjectIdentified in Last Two Planning Cycles9.09CONTRA COSTA COUNTY095120041Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY098052006Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY100303008Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY154210027Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential1 2.9 0.58 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY159180028Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY159190043Single-Family Residential - High Density Planned Unit5 7.2 2.39 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A14 14CONTRA COSTA COUNTY159230007Single-Family Residential - High Density Planned Unit5 7.2 9.75 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A57 57CONTRA COSTA COUNTY161262010Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Two Family Residential06 0.59 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY161262013Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Two Family Residential06 0.69 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY169231011Single-Family Residential - Medium DensitySingle Family Residential0 12 0.29 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY184342008Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.21 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY197050025Single-Family Residential - Very Low DensiResidential Single Family01 9.89 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A8.0 8CONTRA COSTA COUNTY197050026Single-Family Residential - Very Low DensiResidential Single Family01 2.50 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A2.0 2CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354030013Single-Family Residential - High Density General Agricultural5 7.2 2.39 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A2 2CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354041016Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354042029Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354054006Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354064025Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Residential06 0.24 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354072020Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.08 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354072027Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Residential06 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1Page 1
Table A: Housing Element Sites InventoryJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityCONTRA COSTA COUNTY354094014Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Retail Business06 0.04 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354095024Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.15 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354155004Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Residential06 0.11 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354155007Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.12 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY354231028Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.18 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY357061010Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY357224013Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.13 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY357260071Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.24 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY357281005Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit5 7.2 0.31 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070035Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.18 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070036Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.15 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070037Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070038Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.15 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070039Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070040Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.14 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070041Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070042Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070043Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380070044Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.34 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380080030Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.18 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380080031Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380080058Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.42 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380120060Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.30 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380120061Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.30 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380120087Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.17 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY380120088Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.28 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY403152020Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.51 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY403461003Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY409100009Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit06 0.04 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.01CONTRA COSTA COUNTY409262012Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.06 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A11CONTRA COSTA COUNTY409262013Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.06 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A11CONTRA COSTA COUNTY409262015Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit21 29.9 0.06 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A11CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420071012Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420071014Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.28 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420071020Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420071021Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.30 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420172019Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY420172021Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.25 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425110025Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.18 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425130002Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.19 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425130010Single-Family Residential - High Density Planned Unit5 7.2 6.06 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A36 36CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425141005Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.44 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A2 2CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425150046Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425180018Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.19 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425180021Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.87 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A5 5CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425180041Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.92 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A5 5CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425190019Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425190028Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425210003Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.60 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425220014Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.42 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A2 2CONTRA COSTA COUNTY425220029Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.99 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A5 5CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426030070Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.97 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A5 5CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426030071Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 5.46 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A32 32CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426163052Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.35 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426182001Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 3.90 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A23 23CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426182017Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A7 7CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426192005Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.55 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A9 9CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426192007Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.26 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426192008Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.81 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A10 10CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426200008Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.11 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A6 6CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426200010Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 2.43 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A14 14CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426210007Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.31 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A7 7CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426210022Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.83 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A10 10CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426221049Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.29 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426243005Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 1.83 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A10 10CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426243019Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.57 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426243039Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.49 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A2 2CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426243045Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.55 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A3 3CONTRA COSTA COUNTY426270013Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 3.06 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A18 18Page 2
Table A: Housing Element Sites InventoryJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberConsolidated SitesGeneral Plan Designation (Current)Zoning Designation (Current)Minimum Density Allowed (units/acre)Max Density Allowed (units/acre)Parcel Size (Acres)Existing Use/VacancyInfrastructure Publicly-Owned Site StatusIdentified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s)Lower Income CapacityModerate Income CapacityAbove Moderate Income CapacityTotal CapacityCONTRA COSTA COUNTY430132002Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.19 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY430161004Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.44 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY430161020Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.37 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY430184021Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential1 2.9 0.24 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1.0 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY431070026Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.27 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY431070028Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY431070035Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.20 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433190041Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.22 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433190043Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433190060Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.93 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A5 5CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433241057Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.45 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433241065Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY433460007Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.35 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY435120070Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.16 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1CONTRA COSTA COUNTY435130015Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential5 7.2 0.23 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-Owned Available N/A1 1Page 3
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0031200082 1 11.0 80.0 Shortfall of Sites4.94 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family ResidentialRMH M-3017 30 94 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0031200092 1 10.0 77.0 Shortfall of Sites5.08 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family ResidentialRMH M-3017 30 90 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY00418200684 842.0 Shortfall of Sites6.00 CommercialPlanned UnitMU*M-12530 75 170 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0080100392 1 13.0 94.0 Shortfall of Sites4.60 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MUM-300 30 110 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0112200392 2 18.0 128.0 Shortfall of Sites6.42 OfficeArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 150 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY01123004164 Shortfall of Sites5.07 Single Family ResidentialP-1, -UERMM-307 17 64 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0930360106 7Shortfall of Sites0.21 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 13 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0930360144 4Shortfall of Sites0.37 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09303601515 14Shortfall of Sites1.23 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 29 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931210014 4 32 224 Shortfall of Sites10.99 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 264 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700186 7Shortfall of Sites0.12 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 13 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700216 7Shortfall of Sites0.13 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 13 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700226 7Shortfall of Sites0.13 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 13 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09317005616 17Shortfall of Sites0.56 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RHM-6030 70 33 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09317006953 52Shortfall of Sites1.41 Bay Point Residential Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 105 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09317007128 28Shortfall of Sites0.53 Bay Point Residential Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 56 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700743Shortfall of Sites0.05 Bay Point Residential Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700763 3Shortfall of Sites0.06 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931700789 10Shortfall of Sites0.19 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 19 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09317008014 15Shortfall of Sites0.27 Bay Point Residential Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 29 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931910259Shortfall of Sites0.16 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931920264 Shortfall of Sites0.29 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931930022 Shortfall of Sites0.14 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0931930351 Shortfall of Sites0.18 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY095010010325 325Shortfall of Sites6.97 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 650 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950210027 7Shortfall of Sites0.57 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 14VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09502202518Shortfall of Sites0.30 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 18 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950220262Shortfall of Sites0.10 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950220272Shortfall of Sites0.07 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950340026Shortfall of Sites0.12 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950710107 Shortfall of Sites0.50 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950750253 Shortfall of Sites0.21 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09508102012 11Shortfall of Sites0.77 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 23 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09508102322 23Shortfall of Sites0.71 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 45 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950830239Shortfall of Sites0.16 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0950840253 Shortfall of Sites0.22 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0951010016 Shortfall of Sites0.42 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0951010026 Shortfall of Sites0.42 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0951020039 Shortfall of Sites0.66 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0951020201 Shortfall of Sites0.44 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0951070155 Shortfall of Sites0.40 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 5 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960120083Shortfall of Sites0.13 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960120091Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960150112 Shortfall of Sites0.22 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960150154Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960150164Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960160024Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960160034Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960160054Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960160134Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960160184Shortfall of Sites0.20 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960170084Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960180074Shortfall of Sites0.18 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960180153Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960190174Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09601902515Shortfall of Sites0.25 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 15 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200223Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200391 Shortfall of Sites0.08 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200422Shortfall of Sites0.09 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200501 Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200624Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09602008210Shortfall of Sites0.17 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 10 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960200932Shortfall of Sites0.09 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960201734Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09603101813 14 9Shortfall of Sites0.62 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RHM-6030 70 36 Non-VacantPage 1
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09603101922 23 15Shortfall of Sites1.02 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RHM-603070 60 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960320113 4Shortfall of Sites0.12 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 757 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960320163 4Shortfall of Sites0.12 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 757 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09603202810 10Shortfall of Sites0.31 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 20 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09603203222 22 14Shortfall of Sites0.92 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 58 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960330281 Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960330353Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960330372 2Shortfall of Sites0.15 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 4VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09603303911 11Shortfall of Sites0.35 Willow Pass Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 22 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960410014 4Shortfall of Sites0.33 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960410135 4Shortfall of Sites0.35 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960410265 4Shortfall of Sites0.37 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960420209Shortfall of Sites0.41 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960430028 8Shortfall of Sites0.64 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 16Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440015 5Shortfall of Sites0.42 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 10Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440094 4Shortfall of Sites0.33 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 8 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440104 4Shortfall of Sites0.34 Single Family ResidentialArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 8 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09605000712 12Shortfall of Sites1.09 Single Family ResidentialArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 24 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440024Shortfall of Sites0.20 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440039Shortfall of Sites0.41 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960440073Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09605001110 10Shortfall of Sites0.80 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 3020 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960500121 Shortfall of Sites0.15 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960500133Shortfall of Sites0.15 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0960500143Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09605001615 Shortfall of Sites2.96 Single Family ResidentialH-I, -XRMH M-3017 30 15 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0980520531 Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09818000521 Shortfall of Sites1.46 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 21VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09818004111 Shortfall of Sites0.76 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 11VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY09818004311 Shortfall of Sites0.82 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 11VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY0982300238 Shortfall of Sites0.61 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY098250013250 250Shortfall of Sites256.18 MMArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 500 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1250710115Shortfall of Sites0.23 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Planned UnitRMH M-3017 30 5 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1250710126Shortfall of Sites0.27 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Multiple Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY12513001825 25Shortfall of Sites0.79 Public and Semi-PublicRetail BusinessMU*M-12530 75 50 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1251300205 6Shortfall of Sites0.19 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-12530 75 11 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY12514000528Shortfall of Sites0.47 OfficeLimited OfficeMU*M-12530 75 28 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY12515502112Shortfall of Sites0.21 OfficeSingle Family Residential MU*M-12530 75 12 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY14822103372 72 48Shortfall of Sites1.81 Pleasant Hill BART Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12575 125 192 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY14835000910 11Shortfall of Sites0.45 SLR-15RHM-6030 60 21 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY14835001012 12Shortfall of Sites0.48 SLR-15RHM-6030 60 24 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY14835001125 25Shortfall of Sites1.01 SLR-15RHM-6030 60 50 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY14835002044 45Shortfall of Sites1.79 SLR-15RHM-6030 60 89 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1592100041 0 5.0 44.0 Shortfall of Sites0.26 CommercialMultiple Family Residential MUM-12530 75 50 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1592100391 0 5.0 44.0 Shortfall of Sites1.05 CommercialRetail BusinessMUM-12530 75 50 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1592100423 2 18.0 102.0 Shortfall of Sites4.33 CommercialRetail BusinessMUM-12530 75 125 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1592100431 0 5.0 44.0 Shortfall of Sites0.87 CommercialRetail BusinessMUM-12530 75 50 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1592400058 Shortfall of Sites10.00 Light IndustrySingle Family Residential RVLA-1001 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1660300011 1 Shortfall of Sites1.00 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RLR-4013 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1660300026 Shortfall of Sites2.12 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RLR-4013 6 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17204002529Shortfall of Sites0.30 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential MU*M-12575 125 29 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17204002629Shortfall of Sites0.29 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential MU*M-12575 125 29 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17204003434Shortfall of Sites0.35 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential MU*M-12575 125 34 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17204003512Shortfall of Sites0.13 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential MU*M-12575 125 12 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY172080007200 Shortfall of Sites17.21 Single Family ResidentialA-2RMM-307 17 200 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000217 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000317 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000417 18Shortfall of Sites0.34 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000517 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000618 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 36 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000718 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 36 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000818 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 36 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212000918 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 36 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212001018 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 36 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212001117 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant Page 2
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212001217 17Shortfall of Sites0.34 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 34 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212001317 18Shortfall of Sites0.34 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212002517 17Shortfall of Sites0.33 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 34 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212002718 19Shortfall of Sites0.36 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 37 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212002819 19Shortfall of Sites0.37 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 38 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212005117 17Shortfall of Sites0.34 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 34 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY17212005217 18Shortfall of Sites0.35 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RVH M-12570 125 35 Non-Vacant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY172150012154 Shortfall of Sites13.47 Single Family ResidentialA-2RMM-307 17 154 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19106202221 Shortfall of Sites1.64 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 21Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19108000115 Shortfall of Sites1.18 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 15Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19109304313 82 Shortfall of Sites1.50 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-12530 75 95 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1910930446 35 Shortfall of Sites0.65 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-12530 75 41 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19307002110 0Shortfall of Sites7.74 Public and Semi-PublicR-20PSM-6030 60 10 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1970100133 2Shortfall of Sites0.23 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Multiple Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 5 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1970100143 3Shortfall of Sites0.24 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Multiple Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 6 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1970100163 3Shortfall of Sites0.24 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Multiple Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 6 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1970300017 Shortfall of Sites0.61 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 7 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19703002630 30Shortfall of Sites5.68 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single-Family Residential - HigRMH M-3017 30 60 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19703002710 10Shortfall of Sites0.61 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single-Family Residential - HigRMH M-3017 30 20 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY1970400117 Shortfall of Sites0.55 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 7 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY19704001248 Shortfall of Sites3.64 Single-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 48Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3540720031 Shortfall of Sites0.16 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-300 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3540940091 Shortfall of Sites0.09 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-300 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3541730092Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMH M-3017 302 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3541730102Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMH M-3017 302 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3541770072Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMH M-3017 302 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3570420168Shortfall of Sites0.14 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3570520028Shortfall of Sites0.14 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 8 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35708100315Shortfall of Sites0.26 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 15 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571010027Shortfall of Sites0.13 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571110109Shortfall of Sites0.16 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35712000220 21Shortfall of Sites0.65 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 41 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35712000325 25Shortfall of Sites0.79 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 50 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571400107Shortfall of Sites0.12 Parker Avenue Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571400166Shortfall of Sites0.12 Parker Avenue Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571400452Shortfall of Sites0.07 Parker Avenue Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571610016 7Shortfall of Sites0.22 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 13 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571610025 5Shortfall of Sites0.17 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 10 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35716101328 29Shortfall of Sites0.90 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 57 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571610063Shortfall of Sites0.11 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571710023Shortfall of Sites0.10 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571710087 7Shortfall of Sites0.23 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 14 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571710193 4Shortfall of Sites0.11 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 7 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571710201 1Shortfall of Sites0.04 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35717101013 13Shortfall of Sites0.42 Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 26 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY35719400110 Shortfall of Sites0.74 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 10 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3571960122 Shortfall of Sites0.15 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3573710132 Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3801200669 Shortfall of Sites0.63 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY38019401023Shortfall of Sites0.39 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Multiple Family Residential MU*M-12530 75 23 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY3802200661 2 21 Shortfall of Sites0.75 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Multiple Family Residential MU*M-12530 75 24 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40302000935 35Shortfall of Sites2.77 Public and Semi-PublicArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 70 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4030200138 7Shortfall of Sites0.59 Public and Semi-PublicArea Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 15 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40348204358 58Shortfall of Sites4.55 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 116 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY403030005767Shortfall of Sites12.79 Montalvin Manor Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 767 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40321102440 41 26Shortfall of Sites1.69 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 107 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40321102627 27 18Shortfall of Sites1.14 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 72 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40321102787 87 57Shortfall of Sites3.63 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 231 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4052030189 9Shortfall of Sites0.73 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Retail BusinessRMH M-3017 30 18 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4081600161 0Shortfall of Sites0.16 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090110121Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210072Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210081Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210101Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210271Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantPage 3
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210281 Shortfall of Sites0.09 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210323Shortfall of Sites0.15 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210341Shortfall of Sites0.08 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210371Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210401Shortfall of Sites0.05 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090210411Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090310041Shortfall of Sites0.05 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090320132Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090320152Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090320192Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090330012Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090330122Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090330231Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090330252Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090410061Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40904201410Shortfall of Sites0.45 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 10VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090420211Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090420221Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090510022Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090510082Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090520011 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090520031 1Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090520091 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600091 1Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600132Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600182 2Shortfall of Sites0.35 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600292Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600431Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090600441Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4090800051Shortfall of Sites0.05 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091000043 3Shortfall of Sites0.58 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 6 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091100071 1Shortfall of Sites0.19 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091200051 1Shortfall of Sites0.18 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40912001124Shortfall of Sites0.41 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 7524 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091200124Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091310031 1Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091310102Shortfall of Sites0.09 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091310141Shortfall of Sites0.04 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091310151Shortfall of Sites0.04 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091320022Shortfall of Sites0.12 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40913200716 16Shortfall of Sites0.51 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-1253075 32 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091320162Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091410061 1Shortfall of Sites0.18 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091410122Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091420053 2Shortfall of Sites0.49 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 5 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091420122Shortfall of Sites0.10 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091420144 Shortfall of Sites0.40 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091420152Shortfall of Sites0.10 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091420162Shortfall of Sites0.10 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091510051 1Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091510111 0Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091520022Shortfall of Sites0.10 Multiple-Family Residential - Medium Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-1253075 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091520071 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091610011 0Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 1Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40916100310Shortfall of Sites0.17 Multiple-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 10 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091610081 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091620081Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091620181 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091620241Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091620251Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091710122Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091710151 1Shortfall of Sites0.24 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091710231Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091710241Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091720173Shortfall of Sites0.13 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 3 VacantPage 4
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091720271Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091720281Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091810082Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091820021 1Shortfall of Sites0.26 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091820201Shortfall of Sites0.07 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091820232Shortfall of Sites0.07 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091820241Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091910012 2Shortfall of Sites0.35 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 4Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091910091 1Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091910131 0Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 1Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4091920017Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092000091Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092000151Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092000161 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092000241Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092000251Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092100113 3Shortfall of Sites0.53 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 6VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092100204 4Shortfall of Sites0.67 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 8VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092100218 8Shortfall of Sites1.37 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 16 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40921002216 15Shortfall of Sites2.16 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 31 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40921002338 39Shortfall of Sites3.03 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 77 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40921002416 16Shortfall of Sites1.28 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 32 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092100259 8Shortfall of Sites0.70 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 17 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY40921002620 20Shortfall of Sites1.60 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 40 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092200061Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092200071Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092200081Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092300152Shortfall of Sites0.07 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092400179Shortfall of Sites0.15 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092400192Shortfall of Sites0.08 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092400291Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092400301Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092510191Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092510201Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092510214Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092510221 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092520081 1Shortfall of Sites0.19 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092610091Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092610121Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092610137Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092610151Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092610161Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092710051Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092710071Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092710112 Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092710212Shortfall of Sites0.09 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092710251Shortfall of Sites0.07 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092720071Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092720094 3Shortfall of Sites0.23 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 7 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092720101Shortfall of Sites0.04 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092810012 2Shortfall of Sites0.40 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092810116Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092810141Shortfall of Sites0.06 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092820052 2Shortfall of Sites0.34 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 4 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092820066Shortfall of Sites0.12 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 6 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092820191 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-12530 75 2Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092910082Shortfall of Sites0.11 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092910091 1Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 2 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4092920017 6Shortfall of Sites0.61 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMH M-3017 30 13Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4200100015 4Shortfall of Sites0.39 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 9 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42001000215 15Shortfall of Sites1.19 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 30 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42009002944 Shortfall of Sites3.07 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 44 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42014000327 27Shortfall of Sites2.12 CommercialRetail BusinessMU*M-300 30 54 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4201500305 4Shortfall of Sites0.45 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42015003318Shortfall of Sites0.93 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 18 VacantPage 5
Table B: Candidate Sites Identified to be Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing NeedJurisdiction NameSite Address/Intersection5 Digit ZIP CodeAssessor Parcel NumberVery Low-IncomeLow-IncomeModerate-IncomeAbove Moderate-IncomeType of Shortfall Parcel Size(Acres)Current General Plan DesignationCurrent ZoningProposed General Plan (GP) DesignationProposed ZoningMinimum Density Allowed Maximum Density AllowedTotal CapacityVacant/NonvacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42018401527 27Shortfall of Sites2.78 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 54 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4201920182 Shortfall of Sites0.39 Single-Family Residential - High Density Retail BusinessRLM R-1037 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42019203710 9Shortfall of Sites0.76 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 19 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4201920424Shortfall of Sites0.19 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4201920435 6Shortfall of Sites0.47 San Pablo Dam Road Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 11 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42502301142 Shortfall of Sites2.94 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 42 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42504001652 Shortfall of Sites3.64 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 52 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42504002433 Shortfall of Sites2.33 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 33 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42506101266 Shortfall of Sites4.57 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 66 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4250610321 Shortfall of Sites0.20 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4250610331 Shortfall of Sites0.19 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4250610341 Shortfall of Sites0.17 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4250720247 Shortfall of Sites0.49 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMM-307 17 7 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4251000544 Shortfall of Sites0.30 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4251000567 7Shortfall of Sites0.56 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 14 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4251420155 Shortfall of Sites0.41 Single-Family Residential - High Density Area Wide Planned Unit RMM-307 17 5 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4251600159Shortfall of Sites0.40 Open SpaceSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 9 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42517003010 9Shortfall of Sites0.77 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 19 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42520000639 40Shortfall of Sites3.12 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Planned UnitMU*M-300 30 79 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42523003523 24Shortfall of Sites1.94 Appian Way General Mixed UsePlanned UnitMU*M-300 30 47 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42521003711 11Shortfall of Sites0.90 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 22 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42521003912 11Shortfall of Sites0.91 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 23 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42521004212 11Shortfall of Sites0.91 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 23 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252100442 Shortfall of Sites0.33 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252100452 Shortfall of Sites1.30 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Area Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42523001711 11Shortfall of Sites0.89 Appian Way General Mixed UsePlanned UnitMU*M-300 30 22 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252300366 5Shortfall of Sites0.47 Appian Way General Mixed UsePlanned UnitMU*M-300 30 11 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252300376 5Shortfall of Sites0.45 Appian Way General Mixed UsePlanned UnitMU*M-300 30 11 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42523003812 11Shortfall of Sites0.91 Appian Way General Mixed UsePlanned UnitMU*M-300 30 23 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42524004121 21Shortfall of Sites1.68 Appian Way General Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 42 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252510062Shortfall of Sites0.09 CommercialArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252520454Shortfall of Sites0.30 Triangle Area Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 4 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4252520481Shortfall of Sites0.12 Triangle Area Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42525206410 10Shortfall of Sites1.33 Triangle Area Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 20 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY42607002017 Shortfall of Sites2.98 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential RLM R-1037 17 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4262610607 6Shortfall of Sites0.87 Triangle Area Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 13 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY43001202219 Shortfall of Sites3.21 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential RLM R-1037 19 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4301520622Shortfall of Sites0.16 Triangle Area Mixed UseArea Wide Planned Unit MU*M-300 30 2 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4310100104 Shortfall of Sites0.79 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMH M-3017 304 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4310100111 Shortfall of Sites0.26 Single-Family Residential - High Density Single Family Residential RMH M-3017 301 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY43102001710Shortfall of Sites0.45 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 10 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4310700271 Shortfall of Sites0.19 Open SpaceSingle Family Residential RLM R-1037 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY43306001416 Shortfall of Sites1.55 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Residential MU*M-300 30 16 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4350700081 Shortfall of Sites0.16 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Two Family Residential RMH M-3017 30 1 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY43508000523Shortfall of Sites0.99 Multiple-Family Residential - Low Density Single Family Residential RMH M-301730 23 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY4351710061 Shortfall of Sites0.45 Single-Family Residential - Medium Density Single Family Residential RLM R-10371 VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY5200320027 8Shortfall of Sites1.09 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 15 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY5200420132 3Shortfall of Sites0.96 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 5 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY5200500015 5Shortfall of Sites3.42 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 10 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY5200620012 3Shortfall of Sites1.59 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 5 Non-VacantCONTRA COSTA COUNTY5200700047 8Shortfall of Sites2.10 Public and Semi-PublicSingle Family Residential MU*M-300 30 15 Non-VacantPage 6
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Appendix B: Review of Previous B -1
B. A PPENDIX B : REVIEW OF PREVIOUS
HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
Program 1: Neighborhood Preservation Program
Through the Neighborhood Preservation Program, the County provides home rehabilitation
loans to extremely-low, very-low, and low-income persons to make necessary home repairs
and improve their homes. DCD administers this program which is available to income-
qualified households throughout the Urban County.
Eligible residents may receive assistance for a variety of home improvement activities
including but not limited to: re-roofing, plumbing/heating/electrical repairs, termite and
dry rot repair, modifications for disabled accessibility, security, exterior painting, and
energy conservation. Specific loan terms are based on financial need and may be zero or
three percent, deferred or amortizing.
DCD has identified the following unincorporated areas for focused rehabilitation
assistance:
Bay Point, Bethel Island, Byron, Clyde, Crockett, El Sobrante, Montalvin Manor, North
Richmond, Rodeo, Rollingwood, and the Vine Hill area near Martinez.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Disseminate information on housing rehabilitation assistance through the
County website, public access cable channels, notices in the press, presentations
and distribution of brochures to public service agencies and community groups,
and mailings to County residents.
-Rehabilitate 5 units annually for a total of 40 units over 8 years.
Funding Source:
CDBG
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Due to the national emergency declaration due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, this program faced challenges in 2020
that included contact limitations with clients (many at-risk),
limited scopes due to restrictions on more invasive
construction, extended permit/inspection timeframes,
limited materials/equipment availability, homeowner
reluctance for improvements, and the reduction of
contractors.
This program serves the entire county, including the
unincorporated areas and the cities. In total, there were
thirty-five projects that were funded and completed since
the last Housing Element was adopted, with 14 households
at 30% of the area median income (AMI), 7 households at
50% AMI, and 14 households at 80% AMI.
Information about the Neighborhood Preservation Program
is available on the County’s website, public access cable
channels, through notices in the media, and via
presentations given periodically.
Continue
B -2 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Program 2: Weatherization Program
The County DCD offers a free weatherization program for extremely-low, very-low, and low
income homeowners and renters. The program provides resources for minor home repairs
and energy improvements including: attic insulation, weather stripping, pipe wrapping,
furnace filters, shower heads, heaters/ovens, ceiling fans, door bottoms, etc. In addition,
the program provides assistance to lower utility bills for lower income households.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
-Assist 50 households annually for a total of 400 households over 8 years.
-Provide education on energy conservation.
Funding Source:
Low Income Housing Energy Assistance Program
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
More than 1,400 unduplicated units have been weatherized
through this program in County cities, towns, and
communities since adoption of the current Housing
Element. Education about energy conservation was
provided as part of the Residential Energy Conservation
Program discussed later in this table.
Continue
Program 3: Code Enforcement
The DCD Code Enforcement section is responsible for enforcing both State and County
regulations governing the maintenance of all buildings and properties in the
unincorporated areas. Code enforcement handles complaints and inspections in the
unincorporated area. Code enforcement staff handles approximately 60 cases per month.
Most of the complaints deal with property maintenance, substandard housing issues, junk
and debris, and abandoned vehicles. To facilitate the correction of code violations or
deficiencies, code enforcement works closely with other County agencies. Code
enforcement staff routinely refers homeowners to the County’s rehabilitation loan and
grants programs including the Neighborhood Preservation Program. The staff also refers
homeowners, mobile home owners, and apartment owners to the County’s Weatherization
Program.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Continue to implement program.
In 2020, there were a total of 1,675 cases opened and 1,632
cases closed. Approximately 98% of all cases are residential.
Continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -3
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Program 4: Preservation of Affordable Housing Assisted with Public Funds
As of 2014, a total of 1,259 publicly assisted housing units in multi-family developments are
located in the unincorporated areas of the County. Of these units, 49 units in Rivershore
Apartments are at risk of conversion to market rate housing in 2017.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to enforce the condominium conversion ordinance.
- Monitor the at-risk units by reviewing the California Housing Partnership
Corporation list of at-risk properties annually
- Provide information regarding tenant rights and conversion procedures should
the property owner be uninterested in refinancing.
- Offer tenants information regarding Section 8 rental subsidies and other
available assistance through County agencies and non-profit organizations.
Funding Source:
Tax Exempt Bonds, CDBG, HOME
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
The County funds projects throughout the unincorporated
County and in the cities. The following work involving
preservation occurred in the unincorporated County since
adoption of the existing Housing Element:
• The County awarded $2.37 million dollars to Bridge
Housing in CDBG funds for the
acquisition/rehabilitation of 87 existing rental units at
Coggins Square in the Contra Costa Centre area in the
unincorporated Walnut Creek area that is affordable
to and occupied by low-income families.
• The County closed financing and issued $19,500,000 in
tax-exempt bonds on rehabilitation projects, which
includes Elaine Null, a 14-unit apartment in Bay Point.
• The County provided $361,900 in HOME and CDBG
funding for a 14-unit rehabilitation project at Elaine
Null in Bay Point.
• In 2022, the County awarded $2.2 million in CDBG
funds to EAH Housing for the rehabilitation of Rodeo
Gateway Senior Housing, a 50-unit project in Rodeo.
• In 2022, the County awarded $600,000 in funds to
Resources for Community Development (RCD) for the
rehabilitation of Aspen Court, a 12-unit special needs
housing project.
Bonds funding Rivershore Apartments defeased and that
project is no longer deed-restricted for affordable
households. The County will continue to implement this
program and the program will be amended for consistency
with current state law.
Amend and continue
B -4 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
HOUSING PRODUCTION
Program 5: New Construction of Affordable Housing
Non-profit and for-profit housing developers play an important role in providing affordable
housing in Contra Costa County. Over the years, the County has provided direct financial
assistance, regulatory incentives, and land write-downs to numerous developers to provide
both ownership and rental housing to extremely-low, very-low, low-income, and special
needs households. Major sources of County financing include annual entitlement grants of
CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA funds. The County reserves 45 percent of each year’s CDBG
allocation for projects to increase and maintain affordable housing in the Urban County.
The County also serves as an issuer of tax-exempt bond financing when developers seek
tax-exempt financing. Projects have been completed with County resources in both
unincorporated areas and the cities.
Funding is provided annually on a competitive application basis to developers of
multifamily rental housing and homeownership developments. A notice of funding
availability is issued in the fall. Applications are due in late fall/early winter, with funding
awards made prior to the first nine-percent tax credit round in the spring. Funding criteria
include proposed target population and alleviation of affordable housing needs, cost-
effectiveness, developer experience, and term of affordability. The County Board of
Supervisors has adopted a funding priority for projects that reserve a portion of the units
for extremely low income households.
County staff maintains continuous contact with numerous affordable housing developers.
County staff offers formal technical assistance and guidance as well as frequent
consultations with interested developers.
The County awards of HOME and CDBG to housing developers provide local funds, which
help leverage other local, State, and federal funds. The County applies for Mortgage Credit
Certificates annually, which are provided to homebuyers in both unincorporated areas and
all cities and towns.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
-Continue to support Affordable Housing Development through direct financial
assistance. Sources of financial assistance available through the County include
HOME, CDBG, HOPWA, and tax exempt bond financing.
-Meet with the local development community, key leaders and local civic and
community groups to promote the County’s interest in working cooperatively to
increase housing development activity.
The County funds project throughout the unincorporated
County and in the cities. The County provided $2,750,000 in
CDBG funding and $15,790,000 in tax-exempt bonds to
Heritage Point, a 42-unit rental project in North Richmond.
The County provided $66 million in tax-exempt bonds to Bay
Point Family Apartments, a 193-unit multifamily apartment
project.
Continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -5
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
-Allow techniques such as smaller unit sizes, parking reduction, common dining
facilities and fewer required amenities for senior projects.
-Provide low interest loans to non-profit organizations to develop housing
affordable to extremely low- and very low-income households.
-Support applications by nonprofit organizations for affordable housing funds,
including federal, State, and local public and private funds.
-Collaborate with HACCC to explore the use of project-based Section 8 assistance
as leverage to obtain additional private sector funds for affordable housing
development.
-Assist in the financing and development of 100 affordable units over 8 years.
Funding Source:
CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, Bond-financing
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Annual: Award HOME, CDBG, and HOPWA funds to experienced housing
developers (funds are not limited to projects in the unincorporated County)
Program 6: Housing Successor to the former Redevelopment Agency
On February 1, 2012, redevelopment agencies throughout the State of California were
eliminated. The statute eliminating redevelopment allowed housing assets to be retained
by the redevelopment host jurisdiction (known as Housing Successor Agencies). Contra
Costa County owns land designated for housing in Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo.
The Housing Successor Agency provided pre-development funds to Community Housing
Development Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC). CHDC has submitted General Plan
amendment and development applications for the County-owned parcel in North
Richmond (Heritage Point).
The County has not identified developers for the Rodeo Town Center and Orbisonia Heights
properties, but will seek developers next year.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to work on the Heritage Point development in North Richmond.
A Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement and Final
Development Plan for the Rodeo Senior Housing-Phase 2
project in Rodeo was approved in 2022.
A Master Development Agreement and Phase 1 Disposition,
Development and Loan Agreement for the Orbisonia
Heights project in Bay Point were approved in May 2022.
In 2018, the County reissued a request for proposal for the
development of the Rodeo Town Plaza site in Rodeo, which
includes a mixed-use development with townhouses and
commercial spaces. The selected developer did not proceed
with the project. The County issued a Notice of Availability
of Surplus Land for all outstanding Housing Successor
assets. Response to the solicitation was minimal.
Continue
B -6 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
- Issue request for proposals for developers for the Rodeo Town Center and Bay
Point Orbisonia Heights developments.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Disposition agreements by 2020
Program 7: Inclusionary Housing
In October, 2006, the County adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO). All new
residential developments of five or more units, as well as condominium conversions, are
subject to the IHO. Fifteen percent of all the residential units are required to be affordable.
• Rental Projects: 12 percent to lower income households and 3 percent to very low
income households.
• For-sale Projects: 12 percent to moderate income households and 3 percent to low
income households.
Developers may comply with the IHO through several alternative approaches:
• On-site development
• Off-site development
• Land conveyance
• Payment of a fee in lieu of development
• Other – developers may propose another method of compliance that would have at
least the same benefit as on-site construction.
However, in the Palmer/Sixth Street Properties L.P. v. City of Los Angeles ("Palmer"), the
California Court of Appeal held that local inclusionary requirements applied to rental
housing violate the Costa-Hawkins Act, the state law governing rent control. The Palmer
decision has significant implications for local inclusionary ordinances. In response, Contra
Costa lowered the rental in lieu fee to 0 dollars. This effectively suspends the provisions of
the ordinance that apply to rental housing.
An update to the inclusionary housing in-lieu fees for rental
and for-sale housing was brought to the Board of
Supervisors and approved in December 2018, which
became effective in February 2019. The County’s
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 822-4 of the
County Ordinance Code) was updated on November 25,
2019, and February 1, 2022. There was a total of $946,550
in in-lieu fees collected between 2015 and June 2022.
Amend and continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -7
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to implement the IHO and encourage developers to provide affordable
units on site.
- Provide in-lieu fees to support the development of affordable housing projects.
Funding Source:
None Required
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Program 8: Acquisition/ Rehabilitation
The County offers financial assistance, including CDBG, HOME, NSP, and HOPWA funds to
affordable housing developers for the acquisition and rehabilitation of existing rental
housing. These as low-interest deferred loans in exchange for long-term affordability
restrictions on the rental units. Priority is assigned to projects that reserve a portion of the
units for extremely low-income households.
Eight-year Program
Objective:-
Disseminate information on housing rehabilitation assistance on the Department
webpage, presentations and distribution of brochures to apartment owners and
property management associations.
-Provide financing and assist in the acquisition and rehabilitation of 50 rental
units over 8 years.
Funding Source:
CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, Bond Financing
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
In 2022, the County awarded $2,250,000 in CDBG funds to
Rodeo Gateway Senior for the acquisition and rehabilitation
of 49 affordable rental units for very low-income seniors.
In 2020, the County awarded $2.37 million dollars to Bridge
Housing in CDBG funds for the acquisition/rehabilitation of
87 existing rental units in the Contra Costa Centre area in
unincorporated Walnut Creek that is affordable to and
occupied by low-income families. There were no projects in
2018 within the unincorporated County; however, the
County awarded and closed financing for $1.3 million in
HOME funds for the Antioch Scattered Sites rehabilitation
project in Antioch for 56 rental units across two sites. In
2017, the County awarded $625,000 in HOME funds for the
rehabilitation of the Elaine Null Apartments, an existing 14-
unit rental development in Bay Point.
There were no projects in 2015 within the unincorporated
County; however, the County issued $45,464,000 in tax-
exempt bonds for 235 units in the cities of Pinole and
Concord.
Continue
B -8 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Program 9: Second Units
Second units are attached or detached dwelling units that provide complete, independent
living facilities for one or more persons which are located on the same lot as the primary
structure and include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking and sanitation.
Integrating second units in existing residential neighborhoods is a means of increasing the
supply of needed rental housing. The development of second units is also effective in
dispersing affordable housing throughout the unincorporated areas and can provide
housing to lower- and moderate-income individuals and families, as well as seniors and
disabled persons. Since 2003, when the County adopted a Residential Second Unit
Ordinance consistent with State law, there have been 153 second units.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Publicize the Residential Secondary Unit Program to increase public awareness.
Funding Source:
None Required
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
The County’s accessory dwelling unit regulations (Chapter
82-24 of the County Ordinance Code) were last updated in
2020.
Accessory dwelling unit approvals between 2015 and 2021
are detailed below:
Accessory Dwelling Unit Approvals
Entitlement
permits
approved
Building permits
issued
Total 358 312
2021 131 100
2020 84 47
2019 65 58
2018 78 47
2017 0 28
2016 0 19
2015 0 13
The Contra Costa County Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Incentive Program was adopted by the Board of Supervisors
on June 18, 2019, and ran through July 1, 2021. An indirect
outcome of the program is to make construction of ADUs
more attractive in the county, and thereby, facilitate the
development of affordable housing. The ADU Incentive
Program was intended to encourage owners of the
unpermitted ADUs to come into compliance with zoning and
building code requirements using the most cost-effective
methods available and minimizing the changes required to
the existing construction. Late filing fees and building permit
penalty fees were waived for previously constructed
unpermitted ADUs under the program.
The County will continue to update the accessory dwelling
unit regulations for consistency with current state law.
Amend and continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -9
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Program 10: Affordability by Design
Develop affordability by design program to promote creative solutions to building design
and construction.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Draft policy
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
2017
Progress was not made towards this program during the
planning period and it will not be continued.
Delete
Program 11: New Initiatives Program
Develop new programs or policies to fund or incentivize affordable housing development
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Track and evaluate new ideas such as land value recapture
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
2017
In 2017, the County updated the Accessory Dwelling Unit
Ordinance to streamline internal conversions. The County
recently administered the Contra Costa County Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) Incentive Program, which ran from
2019 through mid-2021. Additional information about the
program is provided under the implementation status of
Program 9, above. In addition, the County is working on
updating its code to include objective design standards.
That work will occur in 2022.
Amend and continue
B -10 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
SPECIAL-NEEDS HOUSING
Program 12: Special Needs Housing
In addition to the development of affordable housing in general, the County will work with
housing developers to provide housing appropriate to the County’s special needs
populations, including mentally and physically disabled persons, seniors, large households,
persons with HIV/AIDS, and farmworkers.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Provide financial incentives for the development of housing targeted to special
needs populations (HOME, CDBG, and HOPWA).
- Work with developers to obtain additional required financing.
- Allow techniques such as smaller unit sizes, parking reduction, common dining
facilities and fewer required amenities for senior projects.
Funding Source:
CDBG, HOME, HOPWA
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Annually: Include a priority for special needs housing in CDBG, HOME, HOPWA
NOFA (See #5 above)
In 2022, the County awarded $600,000 in HOPWA funds to
a 12-unit project in Pacheco for the rehabilitation of a
special needs project that includes units for persons with
HIV/AIDS. The County also awarded $2.2 million in CDBG
funds to a 50-unit senior project in Rodeo for rehabilitation.
In 2015, a project on Fred Jackson Way in North Richmond
added two units of very low-income rental housing for
women leaving prison with $245,250 in Neighborhood
Stabilization Program 1 (NSP) funds.
There were no projects in 2016 within the unincorporated
county. However, the County provided $487,000 in HOME
funds to support the development of a 30-unit rental
project in the City of Pittsburg for veterans, including
homeless veterans.
Amend and continue
Program 13: Developmental Disabled Housing
In addition to the development of affordable housing in general, the County will work with
housing developers to provide housing appropriate for persons with developmental
disabilities.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Continue to fund housing developments appropriate for persons with
developmental disabilities.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Progress was not made towards this program during the
planning period.
Combine with Program 12:
Special Needs Housing and
delete.
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -11
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Annually: Include a priority for special needs housing in CDBG, HOME, HOPWA
NOFA (See #5 above)
Program 14: Accessible Housing
Persons with disabilities represent a major special needs group in Contra Costa County. To
maintain independent living, disabled persons are likely to require assistance, which may
include special housing design features, income support for those who are unable to work,
and in-home supportive services for persons with mobility limitations. To provide
additional housing opportunities for the disabled, the County will continue to require
inclusion of accessible units in all new construction projects receiving County financing (e.g.
CDBG, HOME). Current regulations require that five percent of the units must be accessible
to the physically impaired and an additional two percent of the units must be accessible to
the hearing/vision impaired.
In order to facilitate the development of appropriate housing for persons with special
needs, the County works to remove development constraints and provide reasonable
accommodations in the development of such housing as requests are made. The County
will formalize this practice as written reasonable accommodation procedures.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to require inclusion of accessible units in all new construction projects
receiving County financing.
- Provide zero and low-interest loans through the Neighborhood Preservation
Program for accessibility improvements in existing affordable housing.
- Implement reasonable accommodation procedures to provide special
consideration in zoning and land use for housing for persons with disabilities.
The County will strive to make accommodations a ministerial process, with a
minimal processing fee, subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator who
will apply the following decision-making criteria:
1. The request for reasonable accommodation will be for the benefit of an
individual with a disability protected under fair housing laws.
2. The requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to an
individual with a disability protected under fair housing laws.
In 2015, there were no new construction projects in the
unincorporated county. There were three projects that the
County provided funding for in the cities of Antioch, El
Cerrito, and Walnut Creek that included a total of eight fully
accessible units, six physically disabled units, and two
vision/hearing-impaired units.
In 2016, the County provided funding for a multifamily
rental project in North Richmond that included four fully
accessible units, three physically disabled units, and one
vision/hearing impaired unit. Additionally, the County
provided funding for projects located in the Cities of El
Cerrito, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek that included a total of
11 fully accessible units, 8 physically disabled units, and 3
vision/hearing-impaired units.
The County continues to require accessible units in all new
construction projects that receive HOME or CDBG funding.
Accessible units are included in rehabilitation projects when
feasible where 5% of the units must be accessible to the
physically impaired and an additional 2% of the units must
be accessible to the hearing/vision impaired. (See Program
5, New Construction of Affordable Housing)
The County has drafted procedures for reasonable
accommodation but has not yet adopted the procedures.
Amend and continue
B -12 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
3. The requested accommodation would not impose an undue financial or
administrative burden on the County.
4. The requested accommodation would not require a fundamental alteration
in the nature.
Funding Source:
None Required
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Program 15: Reasonable Accommodation
Increase the supply of special needs and accessible housing.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Implement County’s reasonable accommodation policy.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Through Program 1, Neighborhood Preservation Program
(see above), between 2015 and 2020, the County funded 18
projects that consisted of accessibility upgrades. Examples
of upgrades included exterior surface improvements, full
bathroom remodels, the installation of ADA-compliant
toilets, grab bars, handrails, steps and landing, and an easy
step shower enclosure. Translation services have also been
provided through the Neighborhood Preservation Program
(Program 1).
Combine with Program 14
and delete
Program 16: Contra Costa Interagency Council on Homelessness
The Contra Costa Interagency Council on Homelessness implements programs and
strategies contained in the Continuum of Care Plan and Ten-Year Plan to End
Homelessness. These plans are designed to address the needs of the homeless. The goal of
these programs is to ensure that homeless individuals and families can obtain decent,
suitable, and affordable housing in the County. Through the Ten Year Plan, the County has
adopted a “housing first” strategy, which works to immediately house a homeless
individual or family rather than force them through a sequence of temporary shelter
solutions. The Ten Year Plan further deemphasizes emergency shelters by supporting
“interim housing” as a preferred housing type. Interim housing is very short-term and
This program is currently known as the Council on
Homelessness. Health Services through the Health, Housing
and Homeless Services (H3) Division administers the
County's homeless Continuum of Care (CoC). H3 functions
as the collaborative applicant and CoC and HMIS Lead
Agency, and provides strategic direction, coordination of
funding and programmatic oversight to the CoC. The CoC is
designed to assist individuals and families experiencing
homelessness by providing services and housing needed to
help these individuals and families move into permanent
Amend and continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -13
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
focuses on helping people access permanent housing as quickly as possible. Services
provided in interim housing include housing search assistance and case management to
help address immediate needs and identify longer-term issues to be dealt with once in
permanent housing.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Update the Ten-Year Plan
- Continue to work with local non-profit organizations and relevant public
agencies to obtain required funding to expand the number of permanent
supportive housing units.
- Continue to support existing transitional housing programs, operated by the
County and non-profit agencies.
- Continue to support the operations of existing emergency shelters.
- Continue to support licensed residential care facilities in all residential zones
through the land use permit process.
Funding Source:
Hearth Act, CDBG, HOPWA, HOME
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Health Services; Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
housing, with the goal of long-term stability. The Council on
Homelessness (COH), appointed by the Contra Costa Board
of Supervisors, is the governing body for the CoC and serves
as the homelessness advisory body to the Board of
Supervisors. H3 provides staffing support to the COH to
support the governance and administration of the CoC. The
COH is responsible for approving some funding allocations
for proposed projects and monitoring and tracking project
and agency performance and compliance in coordination
with the CoC and HMIS Lead Agency. The COH also provides
advice and input on the operations of homeless services,
program operations, and program development efforts in
Contra Costa County. The Contra Costa CoC and COH are
made up of multiple private and public partners who work
collaboratively with the County and H3 to end homelessness
in Contra Costa.
Program 17: Farmworker Housing
In addition to the development of affordable housing in general, the County will work with
housing developers to provide housing appropriate for agricultural workers.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Include farmworkers as a population likely to be extremely and very-low income
and in need of permanent housing.
Funding Source:
CDBG, HOME
The agricultural worker housing ordinance was adopted on
September 19, 2017. No housing specifically for agricultural
workers has been constructed during the planning period.
The number of farmworkers has been decreasing in the
county. The portion of this program addressing farmworker
housing will not be continued.
Delete
B -14 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Annually: Include farmworker housing in CDBG, HOME NOFA (See #5 above)
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
Program 18: First-Time Homebuyer Opportunities
The County implements a number of programs to provide affordable homeownership
opportunities for lower- and moderate-income households as well as special needs groups,
including farmworkers. These programs include the following:
Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC): The MCC is a federal program designed to assist low
and moderate-income first-time homebuyers. A mortgage credit certificate is issued to
qualified homebuyers, allowing for a federal income tax credit of up to 20 percent of the
annual mortgage interest paid.
New Construction: HOME and CDBG funds are used for new construction and rehabilitation
of single-family homes. Following completion, these funds are rolled over into subsidized
loans for lower- and moderate-income homebuyers.
Inclusionary Housing: Through the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, homes affordable to
lower- and moderate-income homebuyers are constructed as a component of market-rate
housing developments.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to expand homeownership opportunities through a combination of
homebuyer assistance programs, financial support of new construction, and
development agreements.
- Assist 50 first-time homebuyers over 5 years.
Funding Source:
MCC, HOME, CDBG
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Between 2015 and 2020, the County provided 158
households with Mortgage Credit Certificates (MCC)
throughout the county and cities for a total of over $10
million in MCC assistance. In 2015, permits were issued for
12 Muir Ridge Homes.
Continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -15
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Program 19: Extremely Low Income (ELI) Housing Development Assistance
The County is an entitlement jurisdiction for the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. It is a
sub-grantee for the HOPWA program. In addition, the County applies for and receives
approximately $7 million in Hearth Act funds on an annual basis. The County administers
each of these grants for either most or the entire County (incorporated cities and towns,
and the unincorporated areas). Existing Board of Supervisor policy gives priority to projects
that provide housing affordable to and occupied by extremely low income households. The
County shall promote the benefits of this assistance program to develop housing for
extremely low income households on its web page and in its program materials.
The County shall continue to encourage affordable housing developers to seek state and
federal funding to support the construction and rehabilitation of low-income housing,
particularly for housing that is affordable to extremely low income households. The County
shall also seek state and federal funding specifically targeted for the development of
housing affordable to extremely low income households, should they become available.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Department of Conservation and Development will promote the ELI
development assistance program to developers (for profit and non-profit) by
including the priority for ELI housing in information on the HOME, CDBG, and
HOPWA programs.
Funding Source:
HOME, CDBG, State (as funding is available)
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Annually: Include a priority for extremely-low income housing in CDBG, HOME,
HOPWA NOFA (See #5 above)
The County continues to provide funding preferences to
developers throughout the county who include units that
are affordable to extremely low-income households. There
were a total of 1,116 extremely low-income housing units
that were provided funding assistance between 2015 and
2020 for rehabilitation of existing housing (See Program 1,
Neighborhood Preservation Program, and Program 2,
Weatherization Program). There were 63 units of new very
low-income units from the construction of a single-family
residence in Bay Point, Heritage Point Apartments in North
Richmond, and Bay Point Family Apartments in Bay Point.
Continue
PROVISION OF ADEQUATE HOUSING SITES
Program 20: Sites Inventory
As part of the 2015-2023 (5th cycle) Housing Element update, an analysis of the residential
development potential in each of the unincorporated communities of the County was
conducted. This analysis was performed using the County’s Geographic Information System
(GIS) and data from the County Assessor’s records. Based on this assessment, the
The County has continued to maintain an adequate
inventory of suitably zoned sites to address the 5th cycle
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Amend and continue
B -16 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
unincorporated areas can potentially accommodate over 3,318 new units on vacant and
underutilized properties. Combined with housing units built and projects approved since
January 2014, the County has sufficient sites to meet the 1,367-unit RHNA (374 very-low
income, 218 low-income, 243 moderate-income, and 532 above moderate-income).
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to provide adequate sites to accommodate the County’s RHNA of
1,367 units.
- Maintain an up-to-date inventory of vacant/underutilized residential sites as
funding permits and make inventory available to potential developers (both for
profit and non-profit developers)
Funding Source:
Funding source to be determined for maintenance of site inventory
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing maintenance of site inventory.
Program 21: Mixed-Use Developments
County General Plan Land Use Element includes a category for mixed-use developments in
the unincorporated areas. This category has enabled the County to create unique projects
that combine residential uses such as apartments or condominiums with commercial and
other uses. Such developments provide needed housing in close proximity to key services
such as transportation. The development at the Contra Costa Centre is an example of
mixed-use development. The mixed-use category offers the County greater flexibility by
providing needed housing in urban areas close to important services.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to encourage mixed-use development where appropriate by offering
flexible development standards.
- Consider reducing the 15-acre site area requirement for mixed residential and
non-residential uses
In 2015, a 44-unit very low-income affordable mixed-use
project in North Richmond (Heritage Point) was approved.
The County is reviewing the existing ordinance as part of the
General Plan update, currently underway.
Amend and continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -17
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
2015 – 2016: Review existing ordinance and development patterns.
2016 – 2017: Draft outline of revised ordinance and meet with stakeholder
groups
2017 – 2018: Determine whether or not to draft and adopt revised ordinance
Program 22: Density Bonus & Other Development Incentives
In accordance with State law and the County’s Residential Density Bonus Ordinance, the
County provides density bonuses to qualified new housing projects consistent with State
law. The County will continue to update its ordinance as State law changes. Currently, the
housing development must have: (1) at least 5 percent of the total units affordable to very-
low income households; (2) at least 10 percent of the total units affordable to lower
income households; or (3) at least at least 10 percent ownership in a planned development
for moderate income, or (4) 100 percent senior housing development. If one of these
conditions is met, a developer is entitled to a density bonus of 20 percent (5 percent for
ownership) of the maximum density permitted in the underlying zone plus other
development concessions or incentives (e.g. modified standards, regulatory incentives, or
concessions). Affordability must be maintained for a minimum of 30 years. The County has
utilized density bonuses to facilitate the development of affordable housing.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Continue to offer density bonuses and other development incentives to
facilitate affordable housing development.
- Continue to provide information regarding the Density Bonus Ordinance to
developers at the application and permit center in DCD as well as during pre-
application meetings.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
The Driftwood Residential Project in Bay Point included six
affordable units with three new units on-site and three
rehabilitated single-family residences off-site.
Bay Point Family Apartments, a 193-unit multifamily
apartment project entered into a Density Bonus Developer
Agreement with the County. The project was completed in
2017 and includes 191 affordable units.
In 2020, the County granted entitlements for a 284-unit
apartment project in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area
that requested a density bonus. This project includes 12
very low-income units and 24 moderate-income units.
The County recently approved entitlements for two projects
with density bonus requests. The two projects are a 22-unit
apartment complex in Rodeo (approved in 2021) and a 100-
unit apartment in Bay Point (approved in 2022).
The County will continue to update the Density Bonus
Regulations in the County Ordinance Code for consistency
with current state law.
Amend and continue
B -18 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Program 23: Infill Development
Throughout the unincorporated areas, many single-family lots were legally created but do
not meet the current minimum lot size standard specified in the Planning and Zoning Code.
To acknowledge the development right on these parcels, the County DCD uses a Small Lot
Review process to assist applicants in determining the massing and bulk of the units to
ensure compatibility with adjacent properties.
Similarly, many multi-family residential lots in the unincorporated areas do not meet
current minimum lot size standards. Consolidation of a number of undersized lots would
likely be necessary to provide an adequate land area to develop an economically feasible
multi-family project. As a means to facilitate the infill development of multi-family housing,
the County has identified small vacant multi-family residential sites that have the potential
for lot consolidation with adjacent properties.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
-Continue to use the Small Lot Review process to assist applicants in developing
infill single-family homes on small lots.
-Identify small vacant multi-family lots with the potential for lot consolidation and
make this information available to developers.
-Consider offering a tiered density bonus program based on lot size to encourage
consolidation of small lots for multi-family development.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Biennially: Review site inventory and adjust for planned and completed
developments
The County continues to use the Small Lot Review process
to assist applicants in developing infill single-family
residences on substandard-size lots and
streamline the administrative review process for infill
housing in the former redevelopment areas and on
substandard sized lots. This process is a common application
type that is used throughout the county, mostly in older
areas that were established prior to the current zoning
standards.
Continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -19
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
Program 24: Planned Unit District
The Planned Unit District (P-1) provides the opportunity for more creative and flexible
design for large-scale residential developments than would be permitted in the
conventional residential districts. The use of the P-1 district is intended to promote the
diversification of buildings, lot sizes, and open spaces to produce an environment in
harmony with surrounding existing and potential uses. The flexibility associated with the P-
1 district includes variation in structures, lot sizes, yards, and setbacks and enables the
developer to address specific needs or environmental constraints in an area. The final plan
for a P-1 development is subject to approval by the County Planning Commission. The P-1
District is applicable to all residential districts.
Through the P-1 District, increased residential densities can be achieved. Density of up to
44.9 units per acre can be achieved in the P-1 district if the underlying General Plan
designation is Multiple-Family Residential Very High Density (MV). The density can be
increased to 99 units per acre if the underlying General Plan designation is Multiple- Family
Residential Very High Density Special (MS).
In older, developed areas where the objective is to revitalize neighborhoods through
redevelopment, the P-1 process can also be used to define allowable land uses, and
minimum development and design guidelines that are appropriate for the specific
community. In this situation, the P-1 designation streamlines the development process for
projects consistent with the specified guidelines.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Encourage rezoning to P-1 District in the unincorporated areas, where
appropriate, particularly in areas where the underlying General Plan designation
is Multiple- Family Residential Very High Density and Multiple-Family Residential
Very High Density Special.
-Consider eliminating the 5-acre minimum parcel size currently required for P-1
zoning to permit flexibility for small sites and infill development.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
In 2015, a 14-unit residential subdivision and Planned Unit
District was approved.
In 2017, the County began drafting a revised ordinance to
remove the minimum lot size requirements for Planned Unit
Development projects. As of 2020, the Department had
administered a review of the current district standards to
identify any provisions that unintentionally hinder
development in the P-1 District. Staff identified potential
amendments, such as eliminating the existing minimum
acreage requirements for a P-1 district and granting the
Zoning Administrator the ability to decide additional
application types for properties within P-1 Districts, which
will ease the entitlement process for housing developments.
Staff is in the process of finalizing language for a formal
ordinance amendment proposal.
Amend and continue
B -20 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Program 25: Development Fees
The County, special districts, and joint power authorities collect fees on development to
mitigate the impacts of development on infrastructure. Requiring developers to construct
site improvements and/or pay fees toward the provision of infrastructure, public facilities,
services, and processing increases the cost of housing. While these costs may impact
housing affordability, these requirements are deemed necessary to maintain the quality of
life desired by County residents, and are consistent with the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
- Work with utility companies to waive or reduce hook-up fees for second units.
- Monitor transportation fee impact on development costs.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
Under the Contra Costa County Accessory Dwelling Unit
(ADU) Incentive Program, unpermitted ADUs are
encouraged to be legalized and brought into compliance
with zoning and building code requirements. Late filing fees
and building permit penalty fees are waived for previously
constructed unpermitted ADUs under this program. State
law has been updated to regulate the amount of fees that
can be levied on ADUs under a certain size, which addressed
a portion of this program.
Amend and continue
Program 26: Quick Turn-around Program
The County periodically receives applications for small, easily reviewed projects. The
department has begun a program to identify those applications that can be reviewed and
approved much more quickly than complex development applications. The applications for
these small projects are pulled and assigned to staff that will process the application in
approximately five days.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
- Continue to implement program to complete small project application reviews
within 5 days of application submittal.
In 2015, there were three projects that received expedited
review.
This program continues to be utilized for ensuring expedited
review of infill projects and various planning applications,
including tree permits, variances and design reviews.
Continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -21
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
2015
Program 27: Coordinated County Department Review of Development Applications
The County receives development applications for large and complex projects that require
approvals or comments from multiple County departments. A monthly meeting between
upper management representatives facilitates review of these projects. Development
issues are identified early in the project review and staff from the different departments
are able to work as a team to identify approaches to resolve the issues.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Continue monthly meetings with various County departments to review
applications that require approvals or comments from more than one County
department.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development, Public Works, and Health Services Departments
Timeframe:
Ongoing
The County continues to coordinate and work with other
various County departments and agencies when processing
new applications. Regular meetings between community
development, building inspection, and public works are
scheduled to discuss the review and processing of
applications and fees.
Continue
Program 28: Review and Update of Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance
The County regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development in
the unincorporated areas primarily through the Planning and Zoning Code. Zoning
regulations are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of
residents as well as implement the policies of the County General Plan. The County is
engaged in an ongoing process of reviewing the Planning and Zoning Code for consistency
with State laws. The main purpose of this review is to ensure that the County’s
The emergency shelter ordinance was adopted on
November 4, 2014. The agricultural worker housing,
permanent supportive housing, and transitional housing
zoning ordinances were adopted on September 19, 2017.
An ordinance to allow single-room occupancy (SRO) units
was adopted in 2014.
The County is reviewing the existing zoning ordinance as
part of the General Plan update, currently underway.
Amend and continue
B -22 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
requirements and standards do not act as a constraint to the development of affordable
housing.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
-Periodically review the Planning and Zoning Code and other regulations to
ensure that County policies and regulations do not constrain housing
development and affordability.
-Revise the zoning code to allow emergency shelters by right in the General
Commercial zone, permit transitional and permanent housing as residential
uses, and allow agricultural farmworker housing.
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development, and Public Works
Timeframe:
By December 31, 2014: Adopt emergency housing and single room occupancy
ordinance. (adopted 11/4/2014)
1st quarter 2015: Adopt Agricultural worker housing, permanent supportive, and
transitional housing zoning text changes
Ongoing: period review of zoning and subdivision ordinances
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
Program 29: Anti-Discrimination Program
To promote fair housing, the County allocates CDBG funds to local non-profit organizations
for fair housing counseling and legal services. Services offered typically include advocacy
and collaboration in support of fair housing opportunities for all; public outreach and
education regarding fair housing rights; specialized property owner, management, and
lender training; rental home seeking and relocation services; and discrimination complaint
processing and investigation.
All housing developers receiving financial assistance from the County are required to
submit a marketing plan detailing the developer’s equal opportunity outreach program and
demonstrating efforts to reach those people who are least likely to hear about affordable
housing opportunities. Typical outreach includes distributing informational flyers to social
The County Board of Supervisors adopted a Countywide
2020-2025 Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair
Housing Choice report on June 11, 2019. The County
worked with the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and
Walnut Creek as well as the three Public Housing Authorities
in Contra Costa County to prepare this report.
The County continued to provide fair housing services as
described in the program, by contracting with ECHO
Housing.
Amend and continue
Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element B -23
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
service agencies, and housing authority offices. Advertisements are placed in local
newspapers and publications such as the Korea Times, Sing Tao, and El Mensajero.
The Contra Costa Consortium has adopted the HUD-mandated Analysis of Impediments (AI)
to Fair Housing Choice. The AI includes: a comprehensive review of the County’s laws,
regulations, and administrative policies; an assessment of how those laws affect the
location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and an assessment of conditions, both
public and private, affecting fair housing choice.
Eight-year Program
Objectives:
-Continue to support local non-profit organizations for fair housing counseling
and legal services.
-Carry out necessary actions to address the impediments to fair housing choice
identified in the AI.
Funding Source:
CDBG
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Complete update to the AI after promulgation of new regulations
Program 30: Residential Displacement Program
In allocating affordable housing funds, the County assigns priority to projects that do not
involve permanent relocation (displacement). However, projects involving relocation may
be funded if required to eliminate unsafe or hazardous housing conditions, reverse
conditions of neighborhood decline, stimulate revitalization of a specific area, and/or
accomplish high priority affordable housing projects. In such situations, the County
monitors projects to ensure that relocation consistent with federal and state requirements
is provided. Wherever feasible, displaced households and organizations are offered the
opportunity to relocate into the affordable housing project upon completion.
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Prevent permanent relocation to the extent practicable.
There is nothing to report during the planning period within
the unincorporated county. The County will continue to
monitor for potential displacement and implement this
program, including complying with current state law
regarding potential displacement.
Amend and continue
B -24 Contra Costa County General Plan 2040 – Strong Communities Element
Housing Program Implementation Status Continue /Modify/Delete
Funding Source:
HOME, CDBG
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
Ongoing
ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Program 31: Residential Energy Conservation Program
Contra Costa County is actively involved in regional energy conservation and sustainable
development activities. It is a member of the Bay Area Regional Energy Network, which
provides rebates and incentives for energy conservation upgrades. The County is also an
East Bay Energy Watch partner. Recognizing the hurdles residential property owners face
when seeking to install solar panels, Contra Costa is participating in regional efforts to
develop guidelines for solar energy retrofit projects. The County has begun to streamline
the permitting process for solar panels by creating a checklist that includes the required
elements to process a permit application. Staff are identifying common issues that delay
approval. Building upon the checklist, staff will develop guidelines for property owners and
contractors to streamline the application process. convert
Eight-year Program
Objective:
-Develop guidelines for solar energy home retrofit projects
Funding Source:
Conservation & Development
Responsible Agency/Dept.:
Conservation & Development
Timeframe:
2015: Review examples of guidelines for solar retrofit
2016: Draft County guidelines
2017: Adopt guidelines
Solar permits for roof-mounted residential photovoltaic (PV)
systems are available online under the Application and
Permit Center web page. Instructions for online submittal
for expedited review is posted on the County’s web page.
The number of residential solar permits issued in 2020 was
2,355.
The County also participates in the Bay Area Regional
Energy Network (BayREN), one of several Regional Energy
Networks (RENs) established under the auspices of the
California Public Utilities Commission. The program is led by
the Association of Bay Area Governments in coordination
with the nine Bay Area counties and provides rebates for
owners and property managers that make specific energy-
efficiency improvements to single-family and multifamily
buildings. In 2020, there were 1,382 single-family home
upgrades and 6 multifamily projects with 759 multifamily
units upgraded countywide, which includes 103 single-
family upgrades in the unincorporated county.
Continue
2040 Bancroft Way, Suite 400
Berkeley, California 94704
t 510.848.3815
www.placeworks.com
ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE
Board of Supervisors Study Session
December 6, 2022 1
Housing
Element
Overview 2
Click: View > Slide Master > Edit Text to Add Footer
ENVISIONCONTRA COSTA
Overview
»Adoption Deadline: January 31, 2023
•6th Cycle Planning Period: January 31, 2023 –January 31, 2031
•5th Cycle Planning Period: January 31, 2015 –January 31, 2023
»Required Element of the General Plan
»State -mandated update schedule
»Review and certified by State (HCD) for compliance with State law
»Plan for accommodating a jurisdiction’s fair share of the regional housing need
3
Regional
Housing Needs
Allocation
(RHNA)4
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
State
•Housing and Community Development (HCD)
Region
•Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) –
441,176 units
•Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND)
Local
Jurisdiction
•Every town, city, and county must plan to
accommodate its fair share of the regional housing
need.
Contra Costa County: 6 th Cycle RHNA –7,610 units
5th Cycle RHNA –1,367 units
5
Unincorporated Contra Costa County RHNA
Very Low 50% or less <$71,400 2,072
Low 51% to 80%$71,401 -$109,600 1,194
Moderate 81% to 120%$109,601 -$171,350 1,211
Above Moderate More than 120%> $171,350 3,133
Total 7,610
6
Public Draft
Housing
Element 7
Click: View > Slide Master > Edit Text to Add Footer
ENVISIONCONTRA COSTA
What’s In the Draft Housing Element?
»Analysis of existing and projected housing
needs
»Inventory of available land for housing
»Analysis of potential constraints on housing
(e.g., permit processing procedures, fees)
»Assessment of Fair Housing
»Evaluation of previous housing element
»Goals, policies, and implementation actions
8
Click: View > Slide Master > Edit Text to Add Footer
ENVISIONCONTRA COSTA
Housing Element Goals
»Goal HE-1: Maintain and improve the quality of the existing
housing stock and residential neighborhoods in Contra Costa
County, including preserve the existing affordable housing stock.
»Goal HE-2: Increase the supply of housing with a priority on the
development of affordable housing, including housing affordable
to extremely low-income households.
»Goal HE-3: Increase the supply of appropriate and supportive
housing for special-needs populations. social and economic
resources among all communities in the county so that Impacted
Communities are not disproportionately burdened by
environmental pollution or other hazards.
9
Click: View > Slide Master > Edit Text to Add Footer
ENVISIONCONTRA COSTA
Housing Element Goals
»Goal HE-4: Improve housing affordability for both renters and
homeowners.
»Goal HE-5: Provide adequate sites through appropriate land use
and zoning designations to accommodate the County’s share of
regional housing needs.
»Goal HE-6: Mitigate potential governmental constraints to housing
development and affordability.
»Goal HE-7: Promote equal opportunity for all residents to reside in
the housing of their choice.
»Goal HE-8: Promote energy-efficient retrofits of existing dwellings
and exceeding building code requirements in new construction.
1
0
Addressing the RHNA
Very Low 2,072 107 164 5,380 2,549Low1,194 164
Moderate 1,211 70 164 1,767 790
Above Moderate 3,133 1,855 54 2,369 1,145
Total 7,610 2,032 546 9,516
11
Project
Schedule 12
Project Schedule
Consultations, Focus Groups and Administrative Draft Development Fall 2021
Board of Supervisors Kickoff Meeting December 7, 2021
Community Meeting February 2022
Administrative Draft Housing Element July 2022
Prepare Administrative Draft Environmental Review March 2022 –August 2022
Public Review Draft November 2022
Planning Commission Study Session November 30, 2022
Board of Supervisors Study Session December 6, 2022
Submit Draft to HCD (90-Day Review)January –March 2023
2nd HCD Review (60-Day Review) –if needed March/April –May/June 2023
Adoption Hearings Summer 2023
HCD Certification Review (60-Day Review)Summer/Fall 2023
13
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. CONSIDER introducing Ordinance No. 2022-28, an ordinance allowing the sale and delivery of non-flavored cannabis vaping products,
waive reading, and fix December 13, 2022, for adoption.
2. DIRECT Contra Costa Health Services to consult with stakeholders to develop a proposed program designed to raise awareness about the
dangers of youth cannabis vaping and curtail the illegal market, and return to the Board of Supervisors with a recommended program with
funding by the cannabis industry
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are minimal fiscal impacts associated with the adoption of this ordinance. If the Board of Supervisors approves the development of a
program in the Contra Costa Health Services department to work with stakeholders to address the illegal market in cannabis and tobacco vaping,
it is anticipated that there may be additional staffing costs which would be funded by the cannabis industry. There is the potential for additional
revenue to the County by allowing the sale of non-flavored cannabis vaping products.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
NO:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Teresa Gerringer, (925) 655-2330
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.2
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Ordinance Allowing the Sale and Delivery of Cannabis Vaping Products
BACKGROUND:
In the November 2016 election, Californians approved Proposition 64 to legalize adult recreational cannabis usage. Contra Costa voters
approved of recreational cannabis usage by 60.72%.
On August 7, 2018, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2018-23, an ordinance to regulate commercial cannabis activities. The
ordinance required anyone engaged in commercial cannabis activities or engaged in cannabis deliveries to obtain a County health permit in
addition to all other licenses and permits required by the County and the state. The ordinance established standards for the retail sale and
delivery of cannabis and cannabis products.
Since cannabis legalization in California, a number of cities in Contra Costa County have allowed recreational cannabis sales. These cities
all allow the sale of cannabis vaping products. Currently, residents of the unincorporated area can purchase cannabis vaping products by
going to a permitted cannabis retailer located in one of the cities which allow cannabis retail, however, they cannot purchase cannabis
vaping products from a permitted cannabis retailer located in the unincorporated area.
The attached Ordinance No. 2022-28 would allow the sale of non-flavored cannabis vaping products by permitted cannabis retailers located
in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County.
On November 19, 2019, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2019-34, an ordinance to prohibit the sale of tobacco vaping products, flavored
tobacco products, and menthol cigarettes. The ordinance also prohibited the sale or delivery of cannabis vaping products.
Following the adoption of Ordinance No. 2019-34, it has become apparent that many seniors and other adults rely on cannabis vaping
products for both recreational and medical reasons. Under the existing ordinance, homebound seniors and adults in the unincorporated areas
cannot receive vaping cannabis products from any source. The attached ordinance, Ordinance No. 2022-28, would allow the sale and
delivery of non-flavored cannabis vaping products in unincorporated areas, while continuing to prohibit the sale of tobacco vaping
products, flavored tobacco products, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cannabis products in unincorporated areas. The purpose of the
ordinance is to ensure that seniors and other adults who use cannabis vaping products do not use unregulated and potentially tainted
products, and to address geographical equity in access to legal products. Under the proposed Ordinance No. 2022-28, residents in
unincorporated areas would be able to obtain non-flavored cannabis products just like residents in cities that allow cannabis sales and
deliveries.
The recommended action would also direct Contra Costa Health Services to consult with stakeholders to develop a proposed program
designed to raise awareness about and curtail the illegal market in cannabis and tobacco vaping and return to the Board of Supervisors with a
recommended program.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the proposed ordinance is not adopted, seniors and other adults will be unfairly limited by geography and mobility, reducing their access
to a substance that is legal in California and available in several cities around the County. These seniors and other adults may resort to
purchasing cannabis vaping products on the illicit market, increasing the risk of using unregulated and tainted products. If an intensive and
focused program to curtail the sale of illegal, untested cannabis vaping products is not developed, residents of all ages will remain unaware
of the dangers of illegal products, which will increase their health risks.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
The proposed ordinance would continue to prohibit the sale or delivery of all tobacco vaping products, all flavored tobacco and cannabis
products, and menthol cigarettes in the entire unincorporated County area. The development of a program to raise awareness about and
curtail the illegal market in cannabis and tobacco vaping will continue to reduce tobacco influence on youth and the associated negative
health impacts.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speakers: Larry A. Bernard, M.D.; John Gomez, UFCW 5; Olivia T. Lazo; Garrison Hashine; Jim Araby, UFCW; Boston McGee;
Stephanie Uy, NORML; Pablo Coronel; Renee Lee, Rossmoor Compassion Society; Nattali Lahdaa, Contra Costa NORML; Steven Chow,
Shryne Group; Amaya; Jacqueline, West Contra Costa Alcohol Policy Coalition; No Name Given; Sean Kiernan; Dr. Lynn Silver, Senior
Advisor, Public Health Institute U.C.S.F.; Pablo Gorman; Dale Geringer, Director California NORML; Joe Fillborehoff, Sacramento
Commissioner; Mike McDermott; Michelle Swett, Austin Legal Group; Shamika Bowles, Youth Advocating Change Halting Tobacco; Zoe
Schreiber, California Cannabis Industry Association, Garden of Eden Dispensaries and Alameda County and farms; William; Laura
Fogelman; Sara Armstrong, Americans for Safe Access; Jimmy, Contra Costa Tobacco Coalition; Edgar Martinez, Antioch; Greg
Kremenly.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance No. 2022-28 Clean Copy
Draft Ordinance No. 2022-28 Redline Copy
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Correspondence Received
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
ALLOWING THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF CANNABIS VAPING PRODUCTS
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical
footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance
Code):
SECTION 1. SUMMARY. This ordinance amends Chapter 413-4 of the County Ordinance
Code to allow the sale and delivery of cannabis vaping products, while continuing to prohibit the
sale of tobacco vaping products, flavored tobacco products, menthol cigarettes, and flavored
cannabis products.
SECTION 2. Section 413-4.608 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
413-4.608 Retail sales standards. A permittee that sells cannabis or cannabis products shall
comply with all of the following standards in addition to the standards specified in Sections 413-
4.602 and 413-4.604.
(a) Within each building in which cannabis or cannabis products are sold, the permittee shall
prominently display a sign including the following statement in bold print:
“GOVERNMENT WARNING: CANNABIS IS A SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCE. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS
MAY ONLY BE POSSESSED OR CONSUMED BY PERSONS 21 YEARS OF AGE
OR OLDER UNLESS THE PERSON IS A QUALIFIED PATIENT. THE
INTOXICATING EFFECTS OF CANNABIS MAY BE DELAYED UP TO TWO
HOURS. CANNABIS USE WHILE PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE
HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF CANNABIS IMPAIRS YOUR ABILITY TO
DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY. PLEASE USE EXTREME CAUTION.”
(b) Within each building in which cannabis or cannabis products are sold, the permittee shall
establish a waiting area that persons must enter prior to entering the retail area. No
person may be admitted to the waiting area without first verifying through examination of
a government-issued identification card that he or she is at least the minimum age under
state law to enter the premises. The waiting area must be physically separated from the
retail area. No cannabis or cannabis product may be accessible to customers in the
waiting area.
(c) The permittee or at least one employee shall be physically present in the retail area at all
times when any non-employee is in the retail area. Within the retail area, the number of
non-employees may not exceed twice the number of employees at any time.
(d) The sale of any non-cannabis food or beverage, alcohol or alcohol product, or tobacco or
tobacco product from the permitted premises is prohibited.
(e) The sale of more than 800 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol in the form of edible
cannabis products to a single cannabis customer in a single day is prohibited.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 2
(f) The sale of any cannabis product listed in Section 40300 of Division 1 of Title 17 of the
California Code of Regulations is prohibited.
(g) The sale of any flavored cannabis product for which the primary use is human inhalation
of the gases, particles, vapors, or byproducts released as a result of combustion, electrical
ignition, or vaporization of the flavored cannabis product, is prohibited.
(h) A permittee shall not sell, permit to be sold, offer for sale, or display for sale any
cannabis or cannabis product by means of self-service display, vending machine, rack,
counter-top, or shelf that allows self-service sales for any cannabis or cannabis product.
All cannabis and cannabis products must be offered for sale only by means of permittee
or employee assistance. (Ords. 2022-28 § 2, 2019-34 §4, 2018-23 § 2.)
SECTION 3. Section 413-4.610 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
413-4.610 Retail delivery standards. A permittee that delivers cannabis or cannabis products
from a retail location in the unincorporated area of the county to any location in the
unincorporated area of the county shall comply with all of the following standards in addition to
the standards specified in Sections 413-4.602 and 413-4.604. A permittee that delivers cannabis
or cannabis products from a location outside the unincorporated area of the county to any
location in the unincorporated area of the county shall comply with all of the following standards
in addition to the standards specified in Section 413-4.602.
(a) The delivery of more than 800 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol in the form of edible
cannabis products to a single cannabis customer in a single day is prohibited.
(b) The delivery of any cannabis product listed in Title 17, California Code of Regulations,
section 40300, is prohibited.
(c) The delivery of any flavored cannabis product for which the primary use is human
inhalation of the gases, particles, vapors, or byproducts released as a result of
combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization of the flavored cannabis product, is
prohibited.
(d) A permittee may not display any advertisement upon any vehicle that is used for the
delivery of cannabis or cannabis products that promotes any activity related to cannabis
or that identifies the permittee or the business conducting the delivery.
(e) A delivery employee who delivers cannabis or cannabis products to a customer shall have
in his or her possession a copy of the permit issued under this chapter authorizing the
delivery, which shall be made available upon request to law enforcement.
(f) No delivery employee may deliver cannabis or cannabis products to a customer without
first examining a government-issued identification card of the recipient to confirm that
the recipient is the customer who requested the delivery and that the recipient is at least
the minimum age under state law to purchase the cannabis or cannabis product.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 3
(g) A delivery employee who delivers cannabis or cannabis products to a customer shall at
the time of delivery provide the customer with a written warning that includes the
following statement in bold print: “GOVERNMENT WARNING: CANNABIS IS A
SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF
CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS MAY ONLY BE POSSESSED OR
CONSUMED BY PERSONS 21 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER UNLESS THE
PERSON IS A QUALIFIED PATIENT. THE INTOXICATING EFFECTS OF
CANNABIS MAY BE DELAYED UP TO TWO HOURS. CANNABIS USE WHILE
PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF
CANNABIS IMPAIRS YOUR ABILITY TO DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY.
PLEASE USE EXTREME CAUTION.” (Ords. 2022-28 § 3, 2019-34 §4, 2018-23 § 2.)
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage,
and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting
for or against it in the East Bay Times, a newspaper published in this County.
PASSED ON _______________________, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: MONICA NINO, ____________________________
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair
and County Administrator
By: _________________________ [SEAL]
Deputy
H:\2022\Board of Supervisors\sale and delivery of cannabis vaping products - ordinance.docx
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
ALLOWING THE SALE AND DELIVERY OF CANNABIS VAPING PRODUCTS
REDLINE VERSION
SECTION 1. SUMMARY. This ordinance amends Chapter 413-4 of the County Ordinance
Code to allow the sale and delivery of cannabis vaping products, while continuing to prohibit the
sale of tobacco vaping products, flavored tobacco products, menthol cigarettes, and flavored
cannabis products.
SECTION 2. Section 413-4.608 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
413-4.608 Retail sales standards. A permittee that sells cannabis or cannabis products shall
comply with all of the following standards in addition to the standards specified in Sections 413-
4.602 and 413-4.604.
(a) Within each building in which cannabis or cannabis products are sold, the permittee shall
prominently display a sign including the following statement in bold print:
“GOVERNMENT WARNING: CANNABIS IS A SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCE. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS
MAY ONLY BE POSSESSED OR CONSUMED BY PERSONS 21 YEARS OF AGE
OR OLDER UNLESS THE PERSON IS A QUALIFIED PATIENT. THE
INTOXICATING EFFECTS OF CANNABIS MAY BE DELAYED UP TO TWO
HOURS. CANNABIS USE WHILE PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE
HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF CANNABIS IMPAIRS YOUR ABILITY TO
DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY. PLEASE USE EXTREME CAUTION.”
(b) Within each building in which cannabis or cannabis products are sold, the permittee shall
establish a waiting area that persons must enter prior to entering the retail area. No
person may be admitted to the waiting area without first verifying through examination of
a government-issued identification card that he or she is at least the minimum age under
state law to enter the premises. The waiting area must be physically separated from the
retail area. No cannabis or cannabis product may be accessible to customers in the
waiting area.
(c) The permittee or at least one employee shall be physically present in the retail area at all
times when any non-employee is in the retail area. Within the retail area, the number of
non-employees may not exceed twice the number of employees at any time.
(d) The sale of any non-cannabis food or beverage, alcohol or alcohol product, or tobacco or
tobacco product from the permitted premises is prohibited.
(e) The sale of more than 800 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol in the form of edible
cannabis products to a single cannabis customer in a single day is prohibited.
(f) The sale of any cannabis product listed in Section 40300 of Division 1 of Title 17 of the
California Code of Regulations is prohibited.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 2
(g) The sale of any flavored cannabis product for which the primary use is human inhalation
of the gases, particles, vapors, or byproducts released as a result of combustion, electrical
ignition, or vaporization of the flavored cannabis product, is prohibited.
(h) A permittee shall not sell, permit to be sold, offer for sale, or display for sale any
cannabis or cannabis product by means of self-service display, vending machine, rack,
counter-top, or shelf that allows self-service sales for any cannabis or cannabis product.
All cannabis and cannabis products must be offered for sale only by means of permittee
or employee assistance.
(i) The sale of any electronic smoking device that contains tetrahydrocannabinol or any
other cannabinoid, or can be used to deliver tetrahydrocannabinol or any other
cannabinoid in aerosolized or vaporized form, is prohibited. For purposes of this
subsection, “electronic smoking device” has the meaning set forth in Section 445-2.006.
This subsection does not apply to any device regulated by the federal Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
(j) The sale of any e-liquid that contains tetrahydrocannabinol or any other cannabinoid is
prohibited. For purposes of this subsection, “e-liquid” has the meaning set forth in
Section 445-2.006. This subsection does not apply to any substance regulated by the
federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
SECTION 3. Section 413-4.610 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
413-4.610 Retail delivery standards. A permittee that delivers cannabis or cannabis products
from a retail location in the unincorporated area of the county to any location in the
unincorporated area of the county shall comply with all of the following standards in addition to
the standards specified in Sections 413-4.602 and 413-4.604. A permittee that delivers cannabis
or cannabis products from a location outside the unincorporated area of the county to any
location in the unincorporated area of the county shall comply with all of the following standards
in addition to the standards specified in Section 413-4.602.
(a) The delivery of more than 800 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol in the form of edible
cannabis products to a single cannabis customer in a single day is prohibited.
(b) The delivery of any cannabis product listed in Title 17, California Code of Regulations,
section 40300, is prohibited.
(c) The delivery of any flavored cannabis product for which the primary use is human
inhalation of the gases, particles, vapors, or byproducts released as a result of
combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization of the flavored cannabis product, is
prohibited.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-28
Page 3
(d) A permittee may not display any advertisement upon any vehicle that is used for the
delivery of cannabis or cannabis products that promotes any activity related to cannabis
or that identifies the permittee or the business conducting the delivery.
(e) A delivery employee who delivers cannabis or cannabis products to a customer shall have
in his or her possession a copy of the permit issued under this chapter authorizing the
delivery, which shall be made available upon request to law enforcement.
(f) No delivery employee may deliver cannabis or cannabis products to a customer without
first examining a government-issued identification card of the recipient to confirm that
the recipient is the customer who requested the delivery and that the recipient is at least
the minimum age under state law to purchase the cannabis or cannabis product.
(g) A delivery employee who delivers cannabis or cannabis products to a customer shall at
the time of delivery provide the customer with a written warning that includes the
following statement in bold print: “GOVERNMENT WARNING: CANNABIS IS A
SCHEDULE I CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF
CHILDREN AND ANIMALS. CANNABIS MAY ONLY BE POSSESSED OR
CONSUMED BY PERSONS 21 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER UNLESS THE
PERSON IS A QUALIFIED PATIENT. THE INTOXICATING EFFECTS OF
CANNABIS MAY BE DELAYED UP TO TWO HOURS. CANNABIS USE WHILE
PREGNANT OR BREASTFEEDING MAY BE HARMFUL. CONSUMPTION OF
CANNABIS IMPAIRS YOUR ABILITY TO DRIVE AND OPERATE MACHINERY.
PLEASE USE EXTREME CAUTION.”
(h) The delivery of any electronic smoking device that contains tetrahydrocannabinol or any
other cannabinoid, or can be used to deliver tetrahydrocannabinol or any other
cannabinoid in aerosolized or vaporized form, is prohibited. For purposes of this
subsection, “electronic smoking device” has the meaning set forth in Section 445-2.006.
This subsection does not apply to any device regulated by the federal Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
(i) The delivery of any e-liquid that contains tetrahydrocannabinol or any other cannabinoid
is prohibited. For purposes of this subsection, “e-liquid” has the meaning set forth in
Section 445-2.006. This subsection does not apply to any substance regulated by the
federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
H:\2022\Board of Supervisors\sale and delivery of cannabis vaping products - redline ordinance.docx
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RECEIVE monthly update on the activities and oversight of the County's Head Start Program, as recommended by the Employment and Human
Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
On October 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved monthly updates on the activities of Head Start Programs. This is the November 2022
update.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The County will not be in compliance with Head Start program requirements, which may jeopardize funding and the success of the Quality
Improvement Plan.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.3
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Update on Head Start Programs and Oversight
ATTACHMENTS
November Head Start
Update
Head Start Update
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
December 6, 2022
1
Marla Stuart, MSW PhD
Director
Order of Presentation
1.Budget
2.Services
3.Monitoring
4.Region IX Communications
5.Program Information Reports (PIR)
2
Budget
3
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
FY21/22
Cumulative
FY22/23
Cumulative
FY21/22
Budget
FY22/23
Budget
Total FY22/23 Budget =$25,648,843
Year Completed To Date = 33%
Percent Budget Expended YTD = 19%
FY21/22 Final
$19,916,194
76%
September Budget Summary
4
October Credit Card Expenditures
5
$0.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
$30,000.00
July August September October November December January February March April May June
FY 21/22 FY 22/23
Services
6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Enrolled Slots Attendance Rate
Enrollment and Attendance
7EnrollmentAttendance
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Jul
2021
Aug
2021
Sep
2021
Oct
2021
Nov
2021
Dec
2021
Jan
2022
Feb
2022
Mar
2022
Apr
2022
May
2022
Jun
2022
FY21/22 FY22/23
Meals and Snacks Served
8
Current Slots and Waiting List
WAITING LIST = 4,323 (225% OF SLOTS)
(updated 11/30/22)
SLOTS Part-Day Full-Day
Home
Visiting TOTAL
Head Start 356 995 0 1351
Early Head Start 0 424 149 573
TOTAL 356 1419 149 1924
9
Classroom Closures
10
14%
12%13%12%13%12%12%13%
15%
17%18%19%19%20%20%21%
Jul
2021
Aug
2021
Sep
2021
Oct
2021
Nov
2021
Dec
2021
Jan
2022
Feb
2022
Mar
2022
Apr
2022
May
2022
Jun
2022
Jul
2022
Aug
2022
Sep
2022
Oct
2022
CSB Position Vacancies
In October, 2022 CSB had 61 vacant FTE and
73 temporary employees
11
Monitoring
12
Unusual Incidents
Category FY 21/22
FY 22/23
Year to date
Jul-Oct (4 months)
Child Injury 3 5
Lack of Supervision 2 6
Inappropriate discipline 0 0
Potential child abuse
and maltreatment 3 0
Unauthorized release 0 0
Other 12 16
TOTAL 20 27
Average per Month 1.7 6.8
13
Region IX
Communications
14
July 2022 1.Letter from the Office of Head Start Acting Director on Investing in Early Childhood Education Workforce
August 2022 2.Office of Head Start Guidance for Use of Funds Appropriated in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP)
3.Letter from the Office of Head Start Acting Director on Masks and Vaccines in Head Start Programs*
September 2022
4.Strategies to Stabilize the Head Start Workforce
5.Reporting Child Health and Safety Incidents
6.Office of Head Start Mask Announcement
October 2022 7.Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Monitoring Process for Head Start and Early Head Start Recipients*
FY22/23 ACF/OHS
Communications
Communications = Office of Head Start Information Memoranda
15
Program Information
Report (PIR)
16
About the PIR
•Office of Head Start (OHS) mandates grantees to submit
the Program Information Report (PIR) for each
HS/EHS program annually
•Important source of descriptive and service data
•Data drives decision making and informs of quality
services provided. Shared with:
–Head Start Community & Partners
–Congress
–Public
17
FY21/22 Comprehensive Services
18
Accept report.
Motion Requested
19
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN the public hearing on Ordinance No. 2022-37, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing.
2. DETERMINE that adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-37, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA
Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) and 15724.
3. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2022-37, authorizing the establishment of child care centers that have obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses in residential, recreation, office, agricultural, business, and commercial zoning districts with the issuance of a land use
permit.
4. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of preparing this ordinance has been funded by the Department of Conservation and Development, Land Development Fund.
BACKGROUND:
Summary
This is a hearing on a County-initiated zoning text amendment to amend the County Ordinance Code to authorize the establishment of a child
care center with the issuance of a land use permit in Single- and Multi-Family Residential (R-, D-, M-), Recreation (F-1, F-R), Limited Office
(O-1), Agricultural (A-), Business (C-B, N-B, R-B) and Commercial (C) zoning districts. The proposed amendment would also clarify, in
accordance with current State law, that small family child care homes and large family child care homes for up to 14 children are permitted by
right in the Single- and Multi-Family Residential (R-, D-, M-) and Water Recreational (F-1) zoning districts, as well as in the General
Agricultural (A-2) and Heavy Agricultural (A-3) zoning districts.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Zoning Text Amendment Authorizing Child Care Centers (County File #CDZT22-00002)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Background
Child care facilities are regulated and licensed by the California Department of Social Services.The State recognizes two types of child care
facilities: Family Child Care Homes and Child Care Centers. A family child care home can provide care to up to 14 children in the residence
of the child care provider, subject to other location, facility, and safety regulations.A child care center includes any child care facility of any
capacity other than a family child care home, subject to other location, facility, and safety regulations.
The purpose of this zoning text amendment is to authorize the establishment of child care centers that have obtained all required state and
local agency approvals and licenses in Single- and Multi-Family Residential (R-, D-, M-), Recreation (F-1, F-R), Limited Office (O-1),
Agricultural (A-), Business (C-B, N-B, R-B), and Commercial (C) zoning districts with the issuance of a land use permit.
Over the past decade, the County Zoning Code has been amended multiple times to comply with changing State regulations related to the
permitting of child care facilities. Currently, State law provides that the use of a residence as a small or large family childcare home is
considered a residential use of property, and is permitted by right in residential zoning districts. In accordance with State law, the current
County Ordinance Code specifically recognizes this right to establish small and large family child care homes in some residential zoning
districts, but not all. The proposed zoning text amendment will clarify that the establishment of a family child care home (i.e., providing
care to up to 14 children in the home of the care provider) that has obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses is a
permitted use in the residential, recreation, and limited agricultural zoning districts.
The County Ordinance Code does not currently allow the establishment of child care facilities for fifteen or more children in any zoning
district, even with a land use permit. The proposed zoning text amendment would authorize the establishment of child care centers that have
obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses in residential, recreation, office, agricultural, business, and commercial
zoning districts with the issuance of a land use permit. This would allow child care facilities that do not otherwise qualify as a family child
care home, of any capacity, be established and operate in these zoning districts upon the issuance of a land use permit. A table detailing the
land use districts in which a small or large family child care home or a child care center is permitted is attached as Attachment B.
Last, the proposed ordinance would eliminate the term nursery school from uses requiring a land use permit in the residential, office, and
agricultural zoning districts. The California Department of Social Services - Child Care Licensing issues licenses for two types of child
care facilities: child care centers and family child care homes. The State does not recognize a nursery school as a separate form of child care
facility or operation, and would license a qualifying nursery school as a child care center or family child care home, as applicable.
Consistent with the State’s treatment of nursery schools, County staff does not currently process applications to establish a nursery school.
The elimination of the term nursery school from the County’s Zoning Code Ordinance would be consistent with the types of licensing
issued by the State, would prevent confusion on behalf of the public, and would be consistent with current staff practice.
General Plan Consistency
The proposed zoning text amendment complies with the County General Plan. The General Plan land use designations of single-family
residential and multiple-family residential permit child care facilities. The agricultural land use designations also permit child care facilities
as an accessory of residential uses. The zoning text amendment would also be consistent with the following County General Plan Goals and
Policies under the Public Facilities Services Element:
7-AU. To assist and encourage the development of adequate, affordable and quality childcare in Contra
Costa County.
7-AV. To maximize parental choice for childcare options in the community.
7-147. The development of high quality childcare and preschool facilities shall be encouraged in
appropriate locations, especially in conjunction with schools, church facilities and centers of concentrated
employment such as business parks.
7-151. In order to increase parental choice, the location of childcare facilities shall be encouraged in
residential neighborhoods, employment centers, at school sites, hospitals, religious facilities, parks and
along transit routes.
County Planning Commission Hearing
The County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft Ordinance on October 12, 2022. No public comments were submitted
during the hearing. The County Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance.
California Environmental Quality Act
Adoption of the proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
sections 15061(b)(3) and 15274.
CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) is the “common sense exemption.” The proposed actions would authorize the establishment of child
care centers in specific zoning districts after the issuance of a land use permit. No specific project is approved with this ordinance. Any
future establishment of a child care center would be a separate discretionary project reviewed under its own subsequent CEQA analysis.
Thus, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed action could have a significant effect on the environment.
CEQA Guidelines section 15274 exempts the establishment or operation of a family child care home. The proposed ordinance clarifies that,
consistent with State law, the operation of a family child care home is permitted by right in specific zoning districts
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Board does not approve the proposed ordinance, then the zoning code will not be amended to authorize child care centers upon the
issuance of a land use permit in the Single- and Multi-Family Residential (R-, D-, M-), Recreation (F-1, F-R), Limited Office (O-1),
Agricultural (A-), Business (C-B, N-B, R-B), and Commercial (C) zoning districts.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
The recommendation supports one or more of the following children's outcomes:
(1) Children Ready for and Succeeding in School;
(2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood;
(3) Families that are Economically Self Sufficient;
(4) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and
(5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A- Ordinance No. 2022-37
Attachment B- Zoning District Table
Attachment C- Power Point
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Ordinance No. 2022-37
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CHILD CARE CENTERS
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical
footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance
Code):
SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance authorizes the establishment of child care centers
that have obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses in residential,
recreation, office, agricultural, business, and commercial zoning districts with the issuance of a
land use permit.
SECTION II. Section 84-4.402 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-4.402 Uses—Permitted. The following uses are allowed in an R-6 district:
(1)A detached single-family dwelling on each lot and the accessory structures and
uses normally auxiliary to it.
(2)Crop and tree farming.
(3)Publicly owned parks and playgrounds.
(4)A residential care facility for the elderly, operated by a person with all required
state and local agency approvals or licenses, where no more than six persons
reside or receive care, not including the licensee or members of the licensee's
family or persons employed as facility staff.
(5)A small family child care home or a large family child care home, as those terms
are defined in California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 102352(f)(1), that
has obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses.
(6)Bird enclosures in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 82-50.
(7)Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in compliance with
the provisions of Chapter 82-24.
(8)Urban farm animal raising and keeping in compliance with the provisions of
Chapter 82-50.
(9)An urban housing development in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 88-
36.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
1
(10)Supportive housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and license, where not more than six persons reside.
(11)Transitional housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and license, where not more than six persons reside. (Ords. 2022-37 §
2, 2022-14 § 3, 2020-01 § 6, 2018-06, § 4, 2017-14, § 5, 2003-17 § 4, 86-43 § 2,
78-83 § 1, 77-51 § 2, 68-25 § 2: prior code § 8142(a): Ords. 1269 § 1, 1179 § 3,
1039, 1028, 382 § 4A.)
SECTION III. Section 84-4.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-4.404 Uses—Requiring land use permit. The following uses may be allowed in an R-6
district on the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Hospitals, eleemosynary and philanthropic institutions, and convalescent homes.
(2)Churches and religious institutions and parochial and private schools.
(3)Community buildings, clubs, and activities of a quasi-public, social, fraternal or
recreational character, such as golf, tennis, and swimming clubs, and veterans' and
fraternal organizations.
(4)Greenhouses, over three hundred square feet.
(5)More than one detached dwelling unit on a lot or parcel, if the density is not
greater than the following:
R-6 district — Six thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-7 district — Seven thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-10 district — Ten thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-15 district — Fifteen thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-20 district — Twenty thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-40 district — Forty thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-65 district — Sixty-five thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
R-100 district — One hundred thousand square feet per dwelling unit.
D-1 district — No density restriction.
F-1 district — No density restriction.
(6)Commercial nurseries. A land use permit application shall include a site plan
indicating planting and landscaping areas, existing and proposed structures, and
plans and elevations to indicate architectural type.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
2
(7)Medical and dental offices and medical clinics.
(8)Publicly owned buildings and structures except as provided in Division 82.
(9)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses.
(10)Commercial radio and television receiving and transmitting facilities other than
broadcasting studios and business offices.
(11)The installation of exterior lighting at a height of seven feet or more above the
finished grade of the parcel except exterior light placed upon the single-family
residence.
(12)Supportive housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses, where seven or more persons reside.
(13)Transitional housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses, where seven or more persons reside. (Ords. 2022-37 § 3,
2017-14 § 6, 2013-12 § 4, 2003-17 § 5, 87-67 § 4, 86-43, 83-70, 76-75 § 1, 76-36
§ 2, 73-51 § 3, 67-38, 1762, 1569 § 1, 1549: prior code § 8142(b): Ords. 1405,
1179 § 3, 382 § 4A).
SECTION IV. Section 84-14.402 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-14.402 Uses–Permitted. The following uses are allowed in the R-20 district:
(1)A detached single-family dwelling on each lot and the accessory structures and
uses normally auxiliary to it.
(2)Crop and tree farming, and horticulture.
(3)A temporary stand for the sale of agricultural products grown on the premises,
with two and one-half acres per stand, set back at least thirty-five feet from the
front property line, and operated not more than three months in any calendar year.
(4)Urban farm animal raising and keeping in compliance with the provisions of
Chapter 82-50.
(5)Publicly owned parks and playgrounds.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
3
(6)A residential care facility for the elderly, operated by a person with all required
state and local agency approvals or licenses, where not more than six persons
reside or receive care, not including the licensee or members of the licensee's
family or persons employed as facility staff.
(7)A small family child care home or a large family child care home, as those terms
are defined in California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 102352(f)(1), that
has obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses.
(8)Bird enclosures in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 82-50.
(9)Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in compliance with
the provisions of Chapter 82-24.
(10)An urban housing development in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 88-
36.
(11)Supportive housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and license, where not more than six persons reside.
(12)Transitional housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and license, where not more than six persons reside. (Ords. 2022-37 §
4, 2022-14 § 4, 2020-01 § 7, 2018-06 § 5, 2017-11 § 4, 86-43 § 4, 78-83 § 2, 77-
51 § 8, 68-25 § 2, 2033, 2032, 1768 § 2: prior code § 8146(a): Ord. 1269, 1179 §
8, 382 § 4V.)
SECTION V. Section 84-26.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-26.404 Uses—Requiring land use permit. The following uses may be allowed in an M-29
district on the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Hospitals, eleemosynary and philanthropic institutions, convalescent homes, and
boarding homes.
(2)Churches, religious institutions, and parochial and private schools.
(3)Community buildings, clubs, and activities of a quasi-public, social, fraternal, or
recreational character, such as golf, tennis, and swimming clubs; veterans' and
fraternal organizations not organized for monetary profit.
(4)Greenhouses (over three hundred square feet) and nurseries for the propagation of
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
4
plants only and not including any retail sales of nursery products.
(5)Medical and dental offices and clinics.
(6)Publicly owned buildings and structures, except as provided in Division 82.
(7)Commercial radio and television receiving transmitting facilities but not including
broadcasting studios or business offices.
(8)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses.
(9)Supportive housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses, where seven or more persons reside.
(10)Transitional housing, operated by a person with all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses, where seven or more persons reside. (Ords. 2022-37 § 5,
2017-14 § 8, 2013-12 § 5, 2003-17 § 7, 87-67 § 5, 86-43 § 7, 78-40 § 1, 72-44 §
2, 1761, 1569 prior code § 8151(b): Ord. 1224.)
SECTION VI. Section 84-32.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-32.404 Uses—Requiring land use permit. In the F-R district the following uses are
permitted on the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Gift shops.
(2)Tea rooms.
(3)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses. (Ords. 2022-37 § 6, 86-43 § 9: prior code § 8153(a)(b)
(part)).
SECTION VII. Section 84-34.402 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-34.402 Uses—Permitted. Uses permitted in the F-1 district shall be as follows:
(1)A detached single-family dwelling on each lot and accessory structures and uses
normally auxiliary to it.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
5
(2)Crop and tree farming, not including the raising or keeping of any animals other
than ordinary household pets.
(3)Noncommercial boating facilities with a maximum of two boat berths, provided
that the boating facilities have adequate sanitary facilities provided on the lot onto
which the boat berths are attached or on the piers which are attached to the subject
lot. Also, for each boat berth there shall be provided two off-street parking spaces
on the lot onto which the boat berth is attached. The residential off-street parking
requirement may be used to satisfy the parking requirement for one boat berth.
(4)A foster family home or a small family home, as those terms are defined in Health
and Safety Code section 1502(a), that has obtained all required state and local
agency approvals and licenses.
(5)A small family child care home or a large family child care home, as those terms
are defined in California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 102352(f)(1), that
has obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses.
(6)Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in compliance with
the provisions of Chapter 82-24. (Ords. 2022-37 § 7, 2020-01, § 9, 86-43 § 10,
68-25 § 2, 1958: Ord. 67-38 § 1 (part), 1967: prior code § 8154(a): Ords. 671,
613).
SECTION VIII. Section 84-38.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-38.404 Uses—Requiring land use permit. The following uses may be allowed in an A-2
district on the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Publicly owned parks and playground.
(2)Dude ranches, riding academies and stables, and dog kennels.
(3)Publicly owned buildings and structures, except as provided in Division 82.
(4)Commercial radio and television receiving and transmitting facilities but not
including broadcasting studios or business offices.
(5)Wind energy conversion systems. This use is allowed without a land use permit if
used only as an accessory to an allowable residential or agricultural use.
(6)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
6
approvals and licenses.
(7)Hospitals, animal hospitals, eleemosynary and philanthropic institutions, and
convalescent homes.
(8)Churches, religious institutions, and parochial and private schools.
(9)Community buildings, clubs, and activities of a quasi-public, social, fraternal, or
recreational character, such as golf, tennis or swimming clubs, or veterans' or
fraternal organizations. These uses are prohibited if organized for monetary profit.
(10)One additional single family dwelling.
(11)Medical and dental offices and medical clinics.
(12)Merchandising of agricultural supplies and services incidental to an agricultural
use.
(13)Wineries, commercial kitchens, or other facilities for creating value-added farm
products.
(14)Canneries.
(15)Slaughterhouses and stockyards.
(16)Rendering plants and fertilizer plants or yards.
(17)Livestock auction or sales yards.
(18)Commercial recreational facilities when the principal use is not in a building.
(19)Boat storage facilities within one mile by public road of a boat launching facility
open to the public. Vessels and vessel trailers may be stored in a boat storage
facility. Recreational vehicles may be stored in a boat storage facility as long as
the number of recreational vehicles stored does not exceed fifteen percent of the
total number of storage spaces in the storage facility.
(20)Retail firewood sales.
(21)Recycling operations intended to sort or process material for reuse. Junkyards,
defined in Section 88-4.206, are prohibited.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
7
(22)Museums in which objects of historical, artistic, scientific or cultural importance
are preserved and displayed.
(23)A farm market.
(24)Agricultural cold storage plants on parcels less than ten acres in size.
(25)Farmworker housing center.
(26)Commercial cannabis activities that meet the requirements of Chapter 88-28.
(Ords. 2022-37 § 8, 2018-18 § 5, 2017-14 § 10, 2013-12 § 6, 2009-12 § 3,
2007-23 § 4, 2003-11 § 3, 94-28 § 2, 89-46 § 2, 76-36 § 3, 7437 § 2, 60-82, 1988,
1569 § 2: prior code § 8156(b): Ords. 1406 § 3, 497 § 4, 382 § 4E).
SECTION IX. Section 84-80.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-80.404 Uses with land use permit. The following uses may be allowed in an A-20 district
on the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Merchandising of agricultural supplies and services incidental to agricultural use.
(2)Wineries, commercial kitchens, or other facilities for creating value-added farm
products.
(3)Canneries.
(4)Cold storage plants.
(5)Rendering plants and fertilizer plants or yards.
(6)Livestock auction or sales yards.
(7)Wholesale nurseries and greenhouses.
(8)Mushroom houses.
(9)Processing of milk not produced on premises.
(10)Dude ranches, riding academies, stables, dog kennels.
(11)Hospitals, eleemosynary and philanthropic institutions, convalescent homes, and
animal hospitals.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
8
(12)Churches, religious institutions, parochial and private schools.
(13)Community buildings, clubs, activities of a quasi-public, social, fraternal or
recreational character.
(14)Medical and/or dental offices and clinics.
(15)Boat storage area within one mile by public road of a public boat launching
facility.
(16)Oil and gas drilling and production including the installation and use of only such
equipment necessary and convenient for drilling and extracting operations.
(17)Commercial radio and television receiving and transmitting facilities other than
broadcasting studios and business offices.
(18)One additional single-family dwelling.
(19)Wind energy conversion systems, except when used only as an accessory to an
allowable residential or agricultural use.
(20)A farm market.
(21)Farmworker housing center.
(22)Commercial cannabis activities that meet the requirements of Chapter 88-28.
(23)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses. (Ords. 2022-37 § 9, 2018-18 § 5, 2017-14 § 16, 2013-12
§ 9, 2007-23 § 8, 2006-19 § 11, 86-61 § 4, 84-24 § 4, 79-108).
SECTION X. Section 84-80.404 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read:
84-44.404 Use—Requiring land use permit. In the O-1 district the following uses are
permitted upon the issuance of a land use permit:
(1)Hospitals, eleemosynary and philanthropic institutions, convalescent homes, and
boarding homes.
(2)Churches, religious institutions, and parochial and private schools.
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
9
(3)Community buildings, clubs, and activities of a quasi-public, social, fraternal or
recreational character, such as golf, tennis and swimming clubs; veterans' and
fraternal organizations not organized for monetary profit.
(4)Publicly owned buildings and structures, except as provided in Division 82.
(5)Studios and galleries for arts and crafts, music and dance, and photography.
(6)Commercial radio and television receiving and transmitting facilities;
broadcasting studios or business offices; home cablevision facilities, including
repair shops, storage areas, and equipment parking space necessary for operation
and maintenance of the system.
(7)Drug and prescription sales accessory to a medical office or clinic providing such
use is definitely incidental to the primary use and is not visible from the street.
(8)Animal hospital.
(9)A child care center, as the term is defined in California Code of Regulations, title
22, section 101152(c)(7), that has obtained all required state and local agency
approvals and licenses. (Ords. 2022-37 § 10, 76-75 § 4 (part), 71-95 § 1, 71-55 §
1, 1883: prior code § 8157.5(b)).
SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage,
and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for
or against it in the East Bay Times, a newspaper published in this County.
PASSED on ___________________________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: MONICA NINO,_____________________________
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair
and County Administrator
By: ______________________[SEAL]
Deputy
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
10
KCK:
H:\Client Matters\2022\DCD\Ordinance No. 2022-37 Child Care Centers FINAL.wpd
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
11
ATTACHMENT B
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-37
ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE CHILD CARE FACILITIES ARE ALLOWED
ZONING DISTRICTS
Small or Large Family Child Care
Home
(includes facility providing care to
up to 14 children in the home of
the care provider)
Child Care Center (w/ LUP)
(includes any child care facility of
any capacity other than a family
day care home)
Single-Family Residential (R-) X X
Two- Family Residential (D-) X X
Multi-Family Residential (M-) X X
Water Recreational (F-1) X X
Forestry Recreation (F-R) X
General and Heavy Agriculture (A-2, A-3) X X
Exclusive Agriculture (A-20, A-40, A-80) X
Limited Office (O-1) X
Business (C-B, N-B, R-B) X
Commercial (C) X
Child Care Centers
Ordinance No. 2022-37
County File #CDZT22-00002
BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS
DECEMBER 6, 2022
Child Care Facilities licensed and regulated by CA Department of Social Services
•Small and Large Family Child Care Homes
o Provide care to up to 14 children in the residence of the child care provider
o Subject to other location, facility, and safety regulations
•Child Care Centers
o Any child care facility other than a family child care home
o Any capacity, dependent on facility size
o Subject to other location, facility, and safety regulations.
Under CA law, a residence may be used as a small or large family child care home by right in residential
zoning districts
2
Ordinance No. 2022-37
Proposed Ordinance No. 2022-37 would:
•Authorize the establishment of a child care center with the issuance of a land use
permit in residential, recreation, office, agricultural, business, and commercial zoning
districts
•Clarify that, in accordance with State law, the establishment of a family child care
home is a permitted use in the residential, recreation, and limited agricultural zoning
district
•Delete references to “nursery” in the Code, consistent with State licensing and
County permitting practices
3
4
Consistency with the County General Plan
The proposed zoning text amendment complies with the County General Plan as an allowed use.
•The General Plan land use designations of single-family residential and multiple-family residential permit child care facilities.
•The agricultural land use designations also permit child care facilities as an accessory of residential uses.
The zoning text amendment would also be consistent with the following County General Plan Goals and Policies under the Public Facilities Services Element:
•7-AU. To assist and encourage the development of adequate, affordable and quality childcare in Contra Costa County.
•7-AV. To maximize parental choice for childcare options in the community.
•7-147. The development of high quality childcare and preschool facilities shall be encouraged in appropriate locations, especially in conjunction with schools, church facilities and centers of concentrated employment such as business parks.
•7-151. In order to increase parental choice, the location of childcare facilities shall be encouraged in residential neighborhoods, employment centers, at school sites, hospitals, religious facilities, parks and along transit routes.
5
Staff Recommendations
1.OPEN the public hearing on Ordinance No. 2022-37, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public
hearing.
2.DETERMINE that adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-37, is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15724.
3.ADOPT Ordinance No. 2022-37, authorizing the establishment of child care centers that have
obtained all required state and local agency approvals and licenses in residential, recreation,
office, agricultural, business, and commercial zoning districts with the issuance of a land use
permit.
4.DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Exemption
with the County Clerk.
6
Questions?
7
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. ACCEPT the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee (LMHAC) 2022/23 Interim Grant Program Plan; and
2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee to allocate up to $500,000 for grants to identified CBOs, that the
LMHAC have determined to be eligible for grant awards during FY 2022/23 due to having received funding from the Los Medanos
Community Healthcare District (LMCHD) in the 2021/22 grant cycle for providing health related programs to residents of the Los Medanos
Health Area; and
3. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue payments of up to $10,000 to up to 9 eligible CBOs as grant award allocations,
for services identified by the LMHAC as essential services or a holiday event in December 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of these actions would allocate up to $500,000 of Los Medanos Community Health District (LMCHD) property tax revenues to
community programs within the LMCHD boundaries. There is no fiscal impact to the County General Fund. (100% Los Medanos Community
Healthcare District Funding)
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Ernesto De La Torre, (925)
957-2617
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date
shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee 2022/23 Interim Grant Plan
BACKGROUND:
On July 10, 2018, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2018/436 establishing the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee to
develop and implement the Los Medanos Area Health Plan Grant Program. The LMHAC is tasked with:
1. Developing an area health plan that identifies the major health disparities that impact residents of the former LMCHD service area and
identifies priorities for improving health outcomes. The plan will be presented to the Board of Supervisors for review and will not be final
unless adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The LMHAC may engage an outside consultant to assist in developing the plan. The LMHAC
shall submit an updated plan for approval by the Board of Supervisors no less than every five years.
2. Soliciting proposals from service providers that are interested in participating in the Los Medanos Area Health Plan Grant Program (the
"Grant Program") and are capable of addressing the priorities outlined in the adopted plan. Funding for grants will be provided from (i) a
special fund established by the Auditor-Controller, at the direction of the Board of Supervisors, that is used to segregate the property tax
revenue received by the County as a result of the dissolution of the District, and (ii) any other funds made available to the grant program
(e.g. through restricted donations, grants, etc.).
3. The advisory committee will recommend a list of proposed grantees to the Board of Supervisors for approval.
4. Monitor the efficacy of the programs funded by the grant program.
5. Report to the Board of Supervisors no less than once per year on the execution of the adopted plan, the grants provided under the grant
program, the results achieved through the adopted plan and the grant program, and other matters that relate to the LMHAC's purpose and
duties.
When LMCHD was dissolved all previous grants were closed. The initial dissolution timeline stated that a new grant program would be
available 15 months after dissolution (June 2023).
At its July 12, 2022 meeting, the LMHAC discussed an interim grant program to cover major health disparity needs prior to the new grant
program, and approved a subcommittee to develop an Interim Grant Program.
At its October 11, 2022 meeting, the LMHAC unanimously approved the attached Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee Interim Grant
Program, which lists community programs that would be eligible for funding as a single cycle allocation approach to provide transitionary,
one-time grants exclusively to those Community-Based Organizations (CBO) who previously received grants from LMCHD during the
2021/22 grant cycles, pursuant to a Request for Information (RFI) process managed by the Health Services Department. The LMCHD
2021/22 grant cycle provided $486,124 in grant funding as detailed in the attached Interim Grant Program document.
The LMHAC’s proposed Interim Grant Program continues the mission of the Los Medanos Community Health Care District to, ‘Advance
solutions to health disparities within the Los Medanos Health Area’. The Interim Grant Program’s goal is to support the programs that
previously received grants so that interim services can be provided to the Los Medanos Health Area community until the final Grant
Program is approved. During the proposed interim grant window of December 2022 through June 2023, recipients of the Interim Grant
Program will be informed of the single cycle nature of the interim plan and receive guidance on the new grant program, including the
County RFI process that will be implemented in the final Grant Program.
The following are the proposed terms of the Interim Grant Program, as approved by the LMHAC:
* Type of Grant: Project support grant: This grant funds a particular program or project.
* Interim Grant Budget: Up to $500k allocated for the interim grant program
* Grants: Up to 25 transitional grants available, Minimum grant amount, $10,000, One year grant period
* Reporting requirements: Interim grant program - midterm (6mo) and final report (12mo)
* Grant restrictions: Types of organizations – must be 501 (c)(3) or in partnership with a fiduciary agency, No fundraising activities,
Application limited to previous grantees from 2021 to 2022, Cannot be used for capital improvements.
It was also agreed that Health Services will manage the RFI processes for the Interim Grant Program, which will only be available for
programs that received grants during the LMCHD 2021/22 grant cycle.
A letter dated November 10, 2022 (attached), from the City of Pittsburg Mayor, was received by Supervisor Federal Glover and County
staff, urging Board action on funding local community programs being considered by the LMHAC since July of 2022 as part of a
Transitional Grant Funding Program that would fund programs “during the holiday season”. The urgency to fund Aspire’s Youth
Engagement Program – Joy the Urban Nutcracker was specifically mentioned due to potential delays a lack of funding would present for a
program with a performance date of December 10th in Pittsburg.
At the November 22, 2022 LMHAC meeting, there was discussion about the need for grants to support holiday programs in December.
Committee members determined that there was an immediate need to support organizations and programs providing services during the
holiday season. County Staff confirmed that Aspire’s Youth Engagement Program – Joy the Urban Nutcracker had received funding from
LMCHD in 2021/2022 and was providing a holiday event in the Los Medanos Health Area in December 2022.
In addition, the LMHAC reviewed previous LMCHD grants and determined that there were other programs that previously provided food,
shelter, clothing, or holiday events. The LMHAC voted unanimously to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that nine CBOs receive
expedited funding of up to $10,000 each (total $90,000) for their December programs that provide food, shelter, clothing or a Holiday
event. The nine CBOs included in the LMHAC’s recommendation, which are highlighted in the attached LMHAC Interim Grant Program
Plan document, were confirmed to have previously received funding in 2021/22 LMCHD grant cycles. If approved as requested, the
proposed $90,000 expedited allocation for December would exclude a competitive solicitation process. Should the entire $90,000 expedited
allocation be approved and awarded, the remaining $410,000 of funding would include a competitive bidding process in the form of a RFI.
The allocation recommendations for the community programs included in the attached Interim Grant Program that have not been identified
for expedited funding will complete a competitive solicitation process conducted by Health Services staff. The LMHAC will also receive
support from Health Services staff to conduct a competitive solicitation process for the 2023/24 fiscal year final “Grant Program”, which is
planned for June/July of 2023 and as approved by the Board of Supervisors.
Though the LMHAC has identified nine programs with an immediate need for funding beginning the month of December, staff have
determined that LMHAC recommendation does not comply with County competitive solicitation processes, the requirement of execution
of a service contract for expenditure, and the spirit of the terms and conditions imposed by LAFCO as part of the dissolution of the former
district (LAFCO Resolution No. 17-13B ), and is therefore being included as a separate action item for Board consideration, as requested by
the LMHAC.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the LMHAC will not be able to make funding recommendations for LMCHD grant programs for FY
2020/2023.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speakers: Ray, Executive Director, Healthy Arch Institute; Willy, Youth County AECP.
The presentation slides were not available at the time of publication of the agenda. They are adopted into the record by unanimous vote of
the Board.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
LMHAC 2022/23 Interim Grant Program Plan
LMHAC Funding Letter from Pittsburg Mayor
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
LMHAC Presentation
Program FY 2021/22
Amount
Food Holiday Notes Expedited
Funding in
December
18 Reasons 10,000$ Yes No Cooking Matters, teen cooking classes $10,000
Ambrose Aquatic Program 10,000$ No No Swim lesson scholarships $0
Aspire Youth Engagement 27,183$ No Yes Performing arts program supplies & facility rental - Urban Nut Cracker performance $10,000
Buchanan Swim Center 20,000$ No No Swim lesson scholarships $0
CC Health Ministries 17,725$ No No Program services and supplies $10,000
Darius Jones Foundation 22,000$ AED program, Nothing in Dec.$0
Dentist on Wheels (SVdP 20,000$ No No Dental supplies $0
Empowered Aging 10,000$ No No Resident rights education, program support $0
FP Tutoring 8,300$ No No Tutors, programs, supplies $0
Healthy Harts Institute 30,000$ Typically 30,000 per year. Holiday program $10,000 $10,000
Hope Solutions 7,500$ No No Mental health program support for unhoused youth $0
John Muir 20,000$ No No JMH/SVdP mobile clinic, staff support $0
Junior Warriors 17,500$ No No Basketball program support $0
Loaves and Fishes 20,000$ Yes No Annual support to offset increased overall program costs $10,000
Meals on Wheels 10,000$ No No Admin support (gas)$10,000
Nunleys Karate 31,700$ No No Scholarships & supplies $0
PAAACT 14,000$ Yes No Vegetable boxes provided during parent meetings. Nunley Karate $0
People Who Care 11,000$ No No After school program support $0
Pittsburg PD 14,444$ Yes No Food cards for PPD to distribute to the unhoused $10,000
Pitts Youth Dev. Center 20,000$ No No Community mural project supplies $0
Pittsburg 50 Plus 17,272$ No No Older adult program support $0
Rotacare (SVdP)57,000$ no no Free Health Clinic $0
Souljahs 25,000$ Nothing in Dec., MLK Jr., Ceasar Chavez, Juneteenth $0
SparkPoint/RCF 12,500$ No No Financial coaching programs $0
Stoneman Village 20,000$ Yes No subsidize the facility's annual dinner program (150 residents)$10,000
White Pony Express 13,000$ No No Neighbors Helping Neighbors program support $10,000
FY 2021/22 LMCHD TOTAL:486,124$ PROPOSED EXPEDITED FUNDING TOTAL:$90,000
LOS MEDANOS HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2022/23 INTERIM GRANT PROGRAM PLAN
Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Committee Chair
Ernesto De La Torre, Staff to Committee
Dec. 6 2022
Pg 1
Interim Grant Program
•The Committee would like to have an interim grant program that would
allow them to distribute needed funds before the future grant program is
developed.
•Single cycle, 1 year program (Dec. 2022 –June 2023)
•Funding limited to previous grant awardees (2021-2022)
•Provides opportunity to help awardees transition to the future grant program
•Keeps funds moving to programs
•Up to $500,000 allocated to the interim grant program
•Fiscal Grant management
•Seeking community partner who would be able to manage grant distribution and contracting
support.
•CCHS is developing the Request of Interest
Pg 2
Community Garden Update
•Developing RFI for a master gardener
•Local community partner
•Manage gardeners and assigned plots
•Provide educational programs for gardeners
•General garden upkeep
•Details of the Community Garden budget appropriation
recommendations are tentatively scheduled for Board
consideration on 12/13
Pg 3
Los Medanos Area Health Plan
•Working within CCHS and with hospital partners to collect all
available data for the Los Medanos catchment area
•Developing RFI for an agency to support a Health Needs
Assessment for the area
•In addition to data collection HNA will include significant community engagement
& outreach
•Tentative timeline: 4-6 months for Health Needs Assessment
Pg 4
LMHAC Timeline 22/23
12/6 BOS
meeting:
Approve
Interim Grant
Program
12/13 BOS
Meeting:
Approve
LMHAC Budget
& Committee
By Laws
December
2022:
Distribute
grants to
programs in
December that
support food,
clothing or
shelter
January 2023:
Finalize RFI for
Grant
management,
Garden &
Needs
Assessment
Feb/March:
Interim Grant
Contracting
March-June:
Health Needs
Assessment
June-July:
Develop 5-year
grant program
August: begin
new LMHAC
grant program
Pg 5
Advisory Committee Recommendations
1.ACCEPT the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee 2022/23 Interim
Grant Plan.
2.APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee to
allocate up to $500,000 in grants to identified community-based
organizations (CBOs) providing health related programs for residents of
the Los Medanos Health Area. Identified CBOs received funding from the
Los Medanos Community Healthcare District (LMCHD) during the 2021/22
grant cycle.
3.APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee to
allocate up to $90,000 from the interim grant program to be used in
December 2022 for identified CBO programs that provide food, shelter,
clothing, or a Holiday event.
Pg 6
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the County’s Development Impact Fee Annual Report for fiscal year 2021/2022 for the Area of Benefit (AOB) program in
unincorporated Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa County imposes AOB fees on new development within 14 separate AOBs in unincorporated Contra Costa County, pursuant to
Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, 66484, and 66484.7. The AOB program is a traffic mitigation fee program imposed to recover
new development’s proportional share of the costs of transportation improvements required to meet transportation demands within the AOB.
The specific transportation improvements required within each AOB, the costs of those improvements, and new development’s proportional
share of those costs are more particularly described in the most recent Nexus Study report for each AOB. Nexus Studies for all AOBs are on file
with the Public Works Department.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jeff Valeros, 925.313.2031
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 1
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ACCEPT the County’s Development Impact Fee Annual Report for fiscal year 2021/2022 for Area of Benefit Program,
Countywide.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
The Public Works Department prepared the attached Development Impact Traffic Fee Annual Report (Report) for fiscal year 2021/2022 to
satisfy annual reporting requirements of Government Code section 66006(b)(1) that apply to collection and accounting of AOB fee
revenues. The Report was made available at the Clerk of the Board’s office at least 15 days before the Board meeting, in accordance with
Government Code section 66006(b)(2). Public Works Department staff recommends that the Board accept the Report, make the findings
included in the Report based on the information in the Report, and accept the fiscal year 2021/2022 information included in the Report, all
in accordance with Government Code section 66006(b).
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The required findings would not be made, and the required information would not be provided at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
AB1600 Report FY 21-22
Development Impact Traffic Fee Annual Report
Contra Costa County Area of Benefit (AOB) Program
In Compliance with Mitigation Fee Act/Assembly Bill 1600
Fiscal Year 2021/2022
2
Table of Contents
Reporting Requirements for Development Impact Traffic Fees 3
Report Format 4
Attachments
Fiscal Year 2021/2022 A
Traffic Fee Schedule
Fund Balance/Revenue/Expenditures
Project Expenditures
AOB Boundary Map B
3
Development Impact Traffic Fee Annual Report
Contra Costa County Area of Benefit (AOB) Program
Legal Requirements for Development Impact Traffic Fees
California Government Code Section 66006 provides that each local agency that
imposes development impact traffic fees must prepare an annual report that includes
specific information about those fees. In addition, Assembly Bill 1600 imposes certain
accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees, for
accounting purposes, must be segregated from the general funds of the County and
from other funds or accounts containing fees collected for other improvements. Interest
on each development fund must be credited to that fund or account and used only for
the purposes for which the fees were collected.
For each separate development impact fund that the local agency maintains, California
Government Code Section 66006(b)(1) requires the local agency to make available to
the public, within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, the following information
for that fiscal year:
A. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
B. The amount of the fee.
C. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
D. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned.
E. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and
the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage
of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.
F. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds
have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
G. A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and, in the case of an inter-fund loan, the date on which the loan will
be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the
loan.
H. The amount of refunds made due to sufficient funds being collected to complete
financing on incomplete public improvements, and the amount of reallocation of
funds made due to administrative costs of refunding unexpended revenues
exceeding the amount to be refunded.
4
Area of Benefit
An “Area of Benefit” (AOB) is a transportation mitigation program related to a specific
geographic area of unincorporated Contra Costa County in which the County imposes
transportation mitigation fees. This fee is a type of development impact fee on new
development to fund new development’s share of the transportation improvements
required to satisfy transportation demands within that geographic area. (See Gov. Code,
§§ 66484, 66484.7.) As of the end of fiscal year 2021/2022, the County had 14 areas
within the AOB program. During this reporting period, the South Walnut Creek AOB was
absorbed into the Central County AOB and is no longer an active AOB, which reduced the
number from 15 to 14 areas within the AOB program. A map of the AOBs is included as
Attachment B to this report. The current project list for each AOB is included in the most
recent development program report for the AOB, a copy of which can be obtained from
the Public Works Department.
Report Format
Attachment A to this report is a financial report that provides accounting information for
fiscal year 2021/2022, as required by Government Code section 66006(b)(1). For the
fiscal year the report includes three primary tables: the first table is a “Fee Schedule”
Table that identifies the transportation mitigation fees imposed on new development
within each AOB during the fiscal year; the second table is a “Fund Balance” Table that
identifies the beginning and ending fund balance, amount of fees collected, total revenue,
and total expenditures for each AOB; and the third table is a “Project Expenditures” Table
that identifies each project on which fees were expended, the amount of the AOB funds
expended on each project, total project expenditures, and percentage of the total project
cost funded with AOB fees.
The total project cost listed in the third Table is an estimate and may be modified in
future years as a project develops. The initial project estimates developed during the
preparation of the Nexus Study are based upon assumptions related to the site conditions.
As the project develops and data become available related to topography, geometry, soil
conditions, environmental studies, drainage studies, etc., the cost estimate becomes
more refined. At close-out of project construction, the total project cost reflects the actual
cost.
The Other Expenses column within the Fund Balance/Revenue/Expenditures Table
identifies those expenses that are not identified in Table 3 but relate to any of the
following activities: overall programming of projects, project development activities prior
to issuance of a project-specific work order, coordinating with project applicants,
preparation of AOB fee calculations, coordination through the Building Permit and
Application Center, and accounting administration.
Each of the AOB programs has been evaluated, and it has been determined that the need
still exists for each of the AOB programs. Therefore, the fund balance has not been
5
refunded or re-allocated, but rather efforts continue to move towards full implementation
of projects within the project lists.
6
ATTACHMENT A
Fiscal Year 2021/2022
Fee Schedule Table
Fund Balance/Revenue/Expenditures Table
Project Expenditures Table
Single Family Multi Family
Residential Residential Office Industrial Commercial Other
TRAFFIC FEE AREAS Fund ($/DU)($/DU)($/SF)($/SF)($/DU)($/Peak Hour Trip)
Alamo 1260 $14,038.00 $11,694.00 $12.96 $12.96 $12.96 $14,038.00
Bay Point 1395 $9,463.00 $5,773.00 $4.49 $3.56 $5.54 $9,463.00
Bethel Island 1290 $1,944.00 $1,186.00 $2.24 $1.77 $2.78 $1,944.00
Briones 1241 $2,300.00 $1,840.00 $3.68 $1.60 $5.75 $2,300.00
Central County 1242 $6,557.00 $5,828.00 $10.64 $4.59 $12.53 $6,557.00
Discovery Bay 1390 $10,130.00 $6,219.00 $8.07 $6.41 $9.99 $10,130.00
East County 1282 $10,582.00 $6,219.00 $7.40 $3.69 $10.67 $10,476.00
Hercules/Rodeo/Crockett 1231 $1,648.00 $1,319.00 $2.63 $1.15 $4.12 $1,648.00
Martinez 1240 $7,218.00 $5,797.00 $11.56 $5.07 $18.11 $7,218.00
North Richmond 1234 $4,122.00 $3,307.00 $7.26 $5.76 $10.44 $6,337.00
Pacheco 1399 $990.00 $990.00 $3.35 $1.35 $2.05 $990.00
Richmond/El Sobrante 1394 $3,178.00 $2,555.00 $5.05 OTHER $7.93 $3,178.00
South County 1270 $3,587.00 $3,587.00 OTHER OTHER OTHER $3,587.00
South Walnut Creek 1243 $8,488.00 $8,488.00 $13.58 OTHER $16.14 $8,488.00
West County 1232 $5,626.00 $4,502.00 OTHER OTHER $10.75 $5,626.00
Beginning Developer Interest Other Revenue Total Project Other Total Ending
Fund Bal Fees Income / Transfers Revenue Expenditures Expenses Expenses Fund Bal
TRAFFIC FEE AREAS Fund
Alamo 0641 1260 $1,138,938.53 $87,650.00 $3,020.47 $90,670.47 $0.00 $6,390.91 $6,390.91 $1,223,218.09
Bay Point 0685 1395 $1,993,135.56 $9,001.00 $5,599.39 $14,600.39 $0.00 $3,159.14 $3,159.14 $2,004,576.81
Bethel Island 0653 1290 $303,842.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,430.68 $8,430.68 $295,412.18
Briones 0636 1241 $540,699.10 $2,300.00 $1,270.35 $3,570.35 $0.00 $126.00 $126.00 $544,143.45
Central County 0637 1242 $5,288,329.42 $11,999.00 $15,273.25 $27,272.25 $0.00 $77,939.22 $77,939.22 $5,237,662.45
Discovery Bay 0680 1390 $91,536.19 $31,378.00 $384.53 $31,762.53 $0.00 $4.00 $4.00 $123,294.72
East County 0645 1282 $4,396,990.10 $65,556.00 $12,150.38 $77,706.38 $2,396.29 $24,628.53 $27,024.82 $4,447,671.66
Hercules/Rodeo/Crockett 0631 1231 $20,518.87 $8,240.00 $0.00 $8,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28,758.87
Martinez 0635 1240 $2,592,487.59 $14,436.00 $7,469.15 $21,905.15 $348.38 $24,217.24 $24,565.62 $2,589,827.12
North Richmond 0634 1234 $4,168,275.52 $1,990,983.90 $14,729.54 $2,005,713.44 $267,950.65 $41,632.00 $309,582.65 $5,864,406.31
Pacheco 0687 1399 $416,150.77 $170,290.18 $979.13 $171,269.31 $0.00 $8,223.94 $8,223.94 $579,196.14
Richmond/El Sobrante 0684 1394 $373,392.40 $0.00 $380.68 $380.68 $0.00 $6,780.03 $6,780.03 $366,993.05
South County 0642 1270 $2,681,470.06 $10,761.00 $7,604.61 $18,365.61 $0.00 $3,588.75 $3,588.75 $2,696,246.92
South Walnut Creek**0638 1243 $133,723.85 $0.00 $7.69 $7.69 $0.00 $4.00 $4.00 $133,727.54
West County 0632 1232 $128,040.22 $0.00 $19.21 $19.21 $0.00 $4.00 $4.00 $128,055.43
Traffic AOB Totals $24,267,531.04 $2,402,595.08 $68,888.38 $0.00 $2,471,483.46 $270,695.32 $205,128.44 $475,823.76 $26,263,190.74
** The South Walnut Creek AOB was abolished during FY 21/22 and the remaining fund balance was reallocated to the Central County AOB. The South Walnut Creek AOB is no longer shown in the AOB map.
Fee Schedule FY 21/22 (Start of Fiscal Year)
Fund Balances FY 21/22
* No refunds or allocations were made from any of the AOB funds.
TRAFFIC FEE AREAS Project #Project Name (FY 21/22) (FY 21/22) (To Date) (To Date)(To Date)Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00WO4055 Countywide Guardrail Upgrades$2,396.29 $2,396.29 $378,959.30 $1,672,159.30 23%Constructed in 2020Total $2,396.29Total $0.00WO4113 Pacheco Boulevard: Improvements Blum$348.38 $348.38 $71,830.22 $150,779.46 48%Construct in 2025Total $348.38‐Chesley Avenue Traffic Calming*$267,950.65 $267,950.65 $267,950.65 $267,950.65 100%Constructed in 2021Total $267,950.65Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00Total $0.00* The Chesley Avenue Traffic Calming Project was constructed as a condition of approval for a development. The developer was reimbursed with North Richmond AOB funds pursuant to the County's 2007 Traffic Fee Credit and Reimbursement Policy.Project Expenditures FY 21/22Traffic Impact Fee ExpendituresTotal Project Expenditures All Funding SourcesTraffic Impact Fee ExpendituresTotal Estimated Project ExpendituresAll Funding SourcesDevelopment Fees as Percentage of Total ExpendituresProject StatusAlamoBay PointBethel IslandBrionesCentral CountyRichmond/ El SobranteSouth CountySouth Walnut CreekWest CountyDiscovery BayEast CountyHercules/ Rodeo/ CrockettMartinezNorth RichmondPacheco
7
ATTACHMENT B
AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY MAP
AOB S OUTH COUNTY
AOB C ENTRA L COUNTY
AOB A LAM O
AOB EAST COUNTYREGIONAL AREAOF BENE FIT AOB DISCOVERYBAY
AOB BETHELISLANDAOB BAY POINTAOB PACHECO
AOBMARTINEZ
AOB N.RICHMOND
AOB WESTCOUNTY
AOB EL SOBRANTE/RICHMOND
AOB B RIONES
AOB HERC ULES/CROCKETT/RODEO
§¨¦680§¨¦580
Vasco RdB
yro
n H
w
ySellers AveBalfour Rd
Clayton Rd
Lone Tree Way
Camino Diablo
Pinehurst Rd Harbor StA StSt Marys RdSan Pablo Dam Rd 24
160
160
4
4
242
242
123
255 G LACIER D RIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFO RNIA 94553 PH : (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925-313-2333
PROJECT MAPCONTRA CO STA COU NTY AREAS O F BENEFIT
FEDERAL ID NO:DB: CB:DATE:SHEET OFETSEPT. 2022 1 1
CEN TRAL CO UNTY AO B W ITH SUPERVIS OR DISTRICTS
Ü ET
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the County’s North Richmond Area of Benefit (AOB) Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report (Report) for fiscal years
2017/2018 through 2021/2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, North Richmond area. (District I)
FIND that:
A. The Report describes the types of fees contained in the North Richmond Area of Benefit Fund (Fund No. 1234), including the amount of the
fees, the beginning and ending balance of the Capital Facilities Fund, as well as the amount of fees collected, and the interest earned thereon.
B. The Report identifies each public improvement on which North Richmond AOB fees were expended, and the amount of the expenditures on
each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with North Richmond AOB Fees.
C. As described in the Report, sufficient funds have not been collected to complete the financing on incomplete public improvements to be
funded with North Richmond AOB fees.
D. There were no interfund transfers or loans made from the Fund.
E. Sufficient funds have not been collected to complete the financing of any incomplete public improvements on the North Richmond AOB
project list, as described in the Report, and there were no refunds made of North Richmond AOB fees.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jeff Valeros, 925.313.2031
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 2
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ACCEPT the County's North Richmond Area of Benefit Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report for FY 17/18
through FY 21/22, North Richmond area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa County imposes Area of Benefit (AOB) fees on new development within 14 separate Areas of Benefit in unincorporated
Contra Costa County, pursuant to Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, 66484, and 66484.7. The AOB program is a traffic fee
mitigation program imposed to recover new development’s proportional share of the costs of transportation improvements required to meet
transportation demands within the AOB. The specific transportation improvements required within each AOB, the costs of those
improvements, and new development’s proportional share of those costs, are more particularly described in the most recent Nexus Study
and Development Program Report (DPR) for each AOB. Nexus Studies and DPRs for all AOBs are on file with the Public Works
Department.
The North Richmond AOB includes portions of unincorporated Contra Costa County in the North Richmond area. On September 26, 2017,
the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2017-22 to readopt the boundaries of the North Richmond AOB and to impose
transportation mitigation fees on new development within the North Richmond AOB to fund transportation improvements on the project
list. The DPR and Nexus Study in support of Ordinance No. 2017-22 more particularly describe the fee program and the projects on the
project list.
Government Code section 66001(d)(1) requires the County to make specific findings related to AOB fees, projects, and funds following the
fifth fiscal year after monies are first deposited in an AOB fee account. Government Code section 66001(d)(2) requires these findings to be
made in connection with providing information required to be released for that fifth fiscal year, in accordance with Government Code
section 66006(b)(1).
The Public Works Department prepared the Development Impact Traffic Fee Five-Year Report for North Richmond AOB fiscal years
2017/2018 through 2021/2022 to satisfy reporting requirements of Government Code sections 66001(d)(1) and 66006(b)(1) that apply to
collection and accounting of AOB fee revenues. The Report was made available at the Clerk of the Board’s office at least 15 days before
the Board meeting, in accordance with Government Code section 66006(b)(2). Public Works Department staff recommends that the Board
accept the Report, make the findings included in the Report based on the information in the Report, and accept the fiscal years 2017/2018
through 2021/2022 information included in the Report, all in accordance with Government Code sections 66001(d) and 66006(b).
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The required findings would not be made, and the required information would not be provided at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
North Richmond AOB 5-Year Report
"Accredited by the American Public Works Association"
255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4825
TEL: (925) 313-2000 • FAX: (925) 313-2333
www.cccpublicworks.org
Brian M. Balbas, Director
Deputy Directors
Stephen Kowalewski, Chief
Allison Knapp
Warren Laia
Carrie Ricci
Joe Yee
ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON __________________
Five-Year Program Report
for the
North Richmond
Area of Benefit
November 2022
Prepared Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)
Prepared by and for:
Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering D ivision and
Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
1 OF 11
I. INTRODUCTION
The North Richmond Area of Benefit (North Richmond AOB) is a traffic mitigation fee
program established for developers to contribute their fair share of the cost for
transportation improvements necessary to serve growth. On September 26, 2017, the
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2017-22, as well as
Resolution No. 2017/307, to update the Area of Benefit Program for the North Richmond
AOB.
Government Code section 66001(d)(1), and Contra Costa Ordinance No. 2017-22, require
that in the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fund established for receipt
of deposits of the collected transportation mitigation fees, and every five years thereafter,
the Board of Supervisors shall make all the following findings with respect to that portion
of the North Richmond AOB fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncommitted:
(1) Identify the purpose to which the transportation mitigation fees are to be put.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the transportation mitigation
fees and the purpose for which they are charged.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of
incomplete transportation improvements identified in the Report.
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph
three (3) above is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
Government Code section 66001(d)(2) requires the above findings to be made in
connection with providing the public information required by Government Code section
66006(b). Section 66006(b) requires the County to make the following fiscal year
information available within 180 days after the end of the fiscal year:
(1) A brief description of the type of f ee in the account or fund.
(2) The amount of the fee.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
2 OF 11
(3) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
(4) The amount of the fees collected, and the interest earned.
(5) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended
during the fiscal year and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was
funded with fees.
(6) An identification of the approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the County determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
(7) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on whic h the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and in case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
(8) The amounts of any refunds under Section 66001 (e), and any allocations under
Section 66001(f).
This report is prepared to satisfy the above five-year finding and reporting requirements.
This report includes the findings that the Board of Supervisors is required to make under
Government Code section 66001(d)(1), and information in support of each of those
findings.
II. BACKGROUND
An “Area of Benefit” (AOB) is a geographic area of unincorporated Contra Costa County
in which the County imposes transportation mitigation fees – a type of development
impact fee on new development to fund new development’s share of the transportation
improvements required to satisfy transportation demands within that geographic area.
(See Gov. Code, §§ 66484, 66484.7.) The County has 14 Areas of Benefit. This five-year
update report relates to the North Richmond AOB. The North Richmond AOB boundary
location is shown in Exhibit A.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
3 OF 11
The current fee structure is based upon the analysis published in the “Nexus Study North
Richmond Area of Benefit”, dated May 2017 (Nexus Study). The Nexus Study is included
as an exhibit to the Development Program Report attached as Exhibit 1 to Resolution No.
2017/307, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 26, 2017. The fee
structure implemented through Ordinance No. 2017-22 reflects a reduced fee rate for
employment-generating land use , to encourage job growth.
Exhibit A. Area of Benefit Boundary Map
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
4 OF 11
The current North Richmond AOB program includes a project list that consists of 11
projects, focused upon safety , pedestrian infrastructure, bicycle infrastructure and
capacity improvements throughout the area (see Table 1).
Fee Rates
The fee rates established with O rdinance No. 2017-22 are listed below.
Land Use type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $ 3,761 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $ 3,018 per dwelling unit
Commercial/Retail $ 9.53 per square foot
Office $ 6.63 per square foot
Industrial $ 5.26 per square foot
Other $ 5,782 per peak-hour trip
The O rdinance also allows for an annual fee adjustment. The current fee rates were last
adjusted on January 1, 2022, and are as follows:
Land Use type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $ 4,524 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $ 3,6 3 0 per dwelling unit
Commercial/Retail $ 11.4 6 per square foot
Office $ 7.97 per square foot
Industrial $ 6.32 per square foot
Other $ 6,955 per peak-hour trip
Projects Constructed
The following projects have been designed or constructed since 2017:
Fred Jackson Way First Mile/Last Mile (NR4/NR7)
Parr Boulevard and Richmond Parkway Intersection Improvements (NR5)
Central Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (NR12)
Pittsburgh Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (NR13)
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
5 OF 11
Chesley Avenue Traffic Calming Measures (NR15)
Table 1. North Richmond Area of Benefit Project List
Cost estimates and fee rate calculations provided below are from the 2017 Nexus Study
and, therefore, reflect dollar value s at the time of adoption in 2017.
ID Project Total Cost Estimate North Richmond
AOB Share2
Potential AOB Fee
Contribution
NR1 Pittsburg Avenue at Richmond Parkway
Intersection Improvements $1,183,000 7.32% $86,637
NR3/NR10 Market Avenue Complete Streets Project $6,544,000 69.24% $4,531,102
NR4/NR7 /
NR9
Fred Jackson Way Complete Streets
Project $5,345,000 69.24% $3,700,908
NR5 Parr Boulevard Complete Streets Project $5,527,000 33.91% $1,874,437
NR6 Brookside Drive Complete Streets Project $4,892,000 40.17% $1,964,974
NR8 Truck route between Verde Avenue and
Parr Boulevard
$28,453,000
69.24% $19,701,016
NR11 Circulation and safety improvements for
Verde Elementary School $2,597,000 69.24% $1,798,177
NR12
Safety improvements on Central Street,
Between Brookside Drive and Pittsburgh
Avenue
$1,013,000 69.24% $701,407
NR13 Pittsburgh Avenue Complete Streets
Project
$2,208,000
69.24% $1,528,832
NR14
Safety improvements on Goodrick
Avenue,
between Parr Boulevard and AOB
Boundary (550’ South of Richmond
Parkway)
$1,695,000 69.24% $1,173,627
NR15 Chesley Avenue Traffic Calming Measures $143,000 69.24% $99,014
TOTAL 59,600,000 62.35% $37,160,131
Existing Fee Account Balance (as of January 2016 ) $1,161,000
Total Cost Minus Existing Funds (as of 201 7) $35,999,131
Projected Growth in Trips (as of 201 7 ) 2,864
Projected Fee per Trip (as of 201 7) $12,569
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
6 OF 11
Account Status
FY 2017/2018 Beginning Fund Balance – $1,077,691
Funds Expended on p rojects from FY 2017/2018–FY 2021/2022 – $1,319,046
Revenue generated between FY 2017/2018–FY 2021/2022 – $6,105,761
Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 – $5,864,406
III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d)(1) FINDINGS
(1) Identify the purpose to which the transportation mitigation fees are to be put.
The purpose of the fee program is to fund new development’s share of the estimated
costs of the transportation improvements identified in the Nexus Study and shown in
Table 1 (“Transportation Improvements”), pursuant to Government Code sections 66484
and 66484.7. The Transportation Improvements are necessary to meet tr ansportation
demands within the North Richmond AOB by 2040. The transportation mitigation fees
will be used to partially or entirely fund the Transportation Improvements identified in
the Nexus Study, and included on Table 1, including costs related to planning,
engineering, administration, right-of-way acquisition, construction, or any other permits
or studies required through the construction process for the improvements. Projects
NR4/NR7 and NR15 as identified in Table 1 were completed in 2022. Intersection
improvements as part of Project NR5 were constructed in 2021. Pedestrian and bicycle
improvements for Projects NR 12 and NR 13 were constructed in 2020.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the transportation mitigation fees
and the purpose for which they are charged.
As further described in the Nexus Study, the transportation mitigation fees are imposed
to fund new development’s proportional share of the Trans portation Improvements that
will serve or mitigate the impact of transportation demands caused by new development
within the North Richmond AOB by 2040. New development within the North Richmond
AOB will include new single -family residential and multi-fam ily residential dwelling units
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
7 OF 11
and new commercial/retail, office, and industrial developments. Each of these types of
development generates vehicle trips at a certain rate. The transportation mitigation fees
represent new development’s proportional share of the cost of the Transportation
Improvements. Each new development project pays its fair share of the cost of the
transportation improvements required to accommodate it, based on the number of
equivalent dwelling units and trips generated. The transpo rtation mitigation fee for each
new development will be calculated based on a factor of the number of peak -hour vehicle
trips that will be generated by each new development project, and charged on a per -
dwelling-unit, per-square-foot, or per-peak -hour-trip basis. The method of fee
apportionment is based upon industry standard trip generation rates per the Trip
Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financi ng of
incomplete transportation improvements identified in the Report.
The Transportation Improvements within the North Richmond AOB program will be
partially funded by AOB fee revenues. Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal
aid, or local funding sources , such as Measure J funds or gas tax revenues , will be pursued
to complete financing of these projects on a project-by-project basis.
The rate at which revenue is generated by transportation mitigation fees within the North
Richmond AOB is dependent on the rate of new development. North Richmond AOB
revenue generation, as well as gas tax revenue, and grant funds, drive the timing of
construction of Transportation I mprovements because it is anticipated that most
improvements will be funded through a combination of all these funding sources .
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph
three (3) above is expected to be deposited into the appropri ate account or fund.
The rate of revenue for capital improvements can vary based upon the economy and
political issues , so the anticipated dates for funding are estimated. The rate of
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
8 OF 11
development is dependent on the economy and, thus, influences the rate o f North
Richmond AOB fee collections . Over the last five years approximately $6,106,000 in North
Richmond AOB fees were collected. Federal, State, and local dollars can also be
unpredictable. Historically , the rate of gas tax revenue was relatively constant, but due
to reduced revenue resulting from fuel efficient vehicles and pending legislation, it is
difficult to predict the rate of matching funds for these projects in the future.
Grant funds are also difficult to predict as local agencies must compete for funding, and
awards are not assured. Although the rate of funding is unpredictable, a very rough
estimate over the next five years for funding of improvements on the North Richmond
AOB project list is approximately $5,200,000 in public dollars from Local, State and
Federal sources plus an estimated $6,000,000 from North Richmond AOB. Although a
prediction cannot be made with certainty, it is anticipated that the County will receive
sufficient North Richmond AOB and other revenues to complete the following project over
the next five years:
• Market Avenue Complete Streets Project . (Project NR3/NR10):
Market Avenue is a minor arterial in North Richmond that connects residents to
multiple destinations such as grocery stores, places of worship and bus stops . The
intent of the project is to install bicycle and pedestrian improvements and traffic
calming improvements along Market Avenue between Fred Jackson Way and 7 th
Street. By providing a safe connection for pedestrians and bicyclists to newly
constructed active transportation improvements along Fred Jackson Way,
residents of North Richmond will have mo re modes of transportation available to
reach the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), which links them to the greater Bay
Area.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
9 OF 11
IV. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006(b)(1) INFORMATION FOR FY 2021/2022
As Section III of this report provided accounting information for the past five years,
Section IV provides annual reporting for fiscal year 202 1/2022. Full accounting will be
provided for North Richmond AOB with the AB1600 annual report , which is provided to
the Board of Supervisors within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year .
(1) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund :
The North Richmond AOB Fee is a development impact fee on new development to fund
new developm ent’s share of the cost to construct road improvements to serve new
developments in the North Richmond area of Contra Costa County. Requiring that all new
development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that they participate in the
cost of improving the road system.
(2) The amount of the fee:
The fee rates for FY 2021/2022 as of January 2022:
Land Use type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $ 4,524 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $ 3,6 3 0 per dwelling unit
Commercial/Retail $ 11.4 6 per square foot
Office $ 7.97 per square foot
Industrial $ 6.32 per square foot
Other $ 6,955 per peak-hour trip
(3) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund :
FY 2021/2022 Beginning Fund Balance – $4,168,276
FY 2021/2022 Ending Fund Balance – $5,864,406
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
10 OF 11
(4) The amount of the fees collected, and the interest earned:
Developer Fees Collected – $1,990,984
Interest Earned – $14,730
(5) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended
during the fiscal year and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was
funded with fees :
Funds in the amount of $267,951 were expended on public improvements in this fiscal
year as part of the Chesley Avenue Traffic Calming Measures Project (NR15). 100% of
project expenditures were funded by AOB fees.
(6) An identification of the approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the County determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
There is no approximate date to report. Project NR 15 was constructed in summer 2022.
(7) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and in case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
An interfund transfer or loan was not made from the fund.
(8) The amounts of any refunds under Section 66001 (e), and any allocations under
Section 66001(f).
No refunds have been made to the fund.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
North Richmond Area of Benefit
11 OF 11
V. CONCLUSION
The North Richmond AOB program has generated revenue representing new
development’s proportional share of the cost of Transportation Improvements needed to
mitigate transportation impacts within the North Richmond AOB by 2040. Over the past
five years, five such projects have been completed using a combination of North
Richmond AOB transportation mitigation fee revenue, Federal funds such as Active
Transportation Program (ATP), State funds such as State Coastal Conservancy (SCC), and
other local funds such as Measure J Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC). These
funds have been and will continue to be used to fully fund projects within on the AOB
project list. Recently , Fred Jackson Way First Mile/Last Mile Project (Project NR4/NR7 in
Table 1) received $3,298,000 in Federal funds, and this project was constructed in
summer 2022.1 Therefore, the County has made reasonable progress in implementing
the Transportation Improvements included in the North Richmond AOB program.
Looking forward to the next five years, it is anticipated that one additional project will be
constructed from the North Richmond AOB project list with growth’s fair share of funding
provided by the North Richmond AOB fund balance. The remainder of funds for the future
projects will come from a combination of grants and local road funds . The circulation
needs for this area as detailed in the 2017 Nexus Study remain. The current fund balance
will be allocated to the projects listed in Table 1.
G:\transeng\AOB\North Richmond AOB\2022 5-yr Review\Final Report\5-Year Report North Richmond AOB.docx
1 Project NR4/NR7 utilized North Richmond AOB funds in fiscal years prior to FY 21/22. Grant funds were used in FY
21/22 for the construction of the project. Thus, no AOB funds for the project were reported pursuant to
Government Code section 66006(b).
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the County’s South County Area of Benefit (AOB) Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report (Report) for fiscal years
2017/2018 through 2021/2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, South County area. (Districts II and III)
FIND that:
A. The Report describes the types of fees contained in the South County Area of Benefit Fund (Fund no. 1270) including the amount of the
fees, the beginning and ending balance of the Capital Facilities Fund, as well as the amount of fees collected, and the interest earned thereon.
B. The Report identifies each public improvement on which South County AOB fees were expended, and the amount of the expenditures on
each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with South County AOB Fees.
C. As described in the Report, sufficient funds have not been collected to complete the financing on incomplete public improvements to be
funded with South County AOB fees.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jeff Valeros, 925.313.2031
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 3
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ACCEPT the County's South County Area of Benefit Development Impact Fee Five-Year Program Report for FY 21/22, South
County area.
RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
D. There were no interfund transfers or loans made from the Fund.
E. Sufficient funds have not been collected to complete the financing of any incomplete public improvements on the South County AOB
project list, as described in the Report, and there were no refunds made of South County AOB fees.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa County imposes Area of Benefit fees on new development within 14 separate Areas of Benefit in unincorporated Contra
Costa County, pursuant to Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, 66484, and 66484.7. The AOB program is a traffic fee
mitigation program imposed to recover new development’s proportional share of the costs of transportation improvements required to meet
transportation demands within the AOB. The specific transportation improvements required within each AOB, the costs of those
improvements, and new development’s proportional share of those costs, are more particularly described in the most recent Nexus Study
and Development Program Report (DPR) for each AOB. Nexus Studies and DPRs for all AOBs are on file with the Public Works
Department.
The South County AOB includes portions of unincorporated Contra Costa County in the South County area. On August 6, 1996, the Board
of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 1996-27 to readopt the boundaries of the South County AOB and to impose transportation mitigation
fees on new development within the South County AOB to fund transportation improvements on the project list. The DPR in support of
Ordinance No. 1996-27 more particularly describes the fee program and the projects on the project list.
Government Code section 66001(d)(1) requires the County to make specific findings related to AOB fees, projects, and funds following the
fifth fiscal year after monies are first deposited in an AOB fee account. Government Code section 66001(d)(2) requires these findings to be
made in connection with providing information required to be released for that fifth fiscal year, in accordance with Government Code
section 66006(b)(1).
The Public Works Department prepared the Development Impact Traffic Fee Five-Year Report for South County AOB fiscal years
2017/2018 through 2021/2022 to satisfy reporting requirements of Government Code sections 66001(d)(1) and 66006(b)(1) that apply to
collection and accounting of AOB fee revenues. The Report was made available at the Clerk of the Board’s office at least 15 days before
the Board meeting, in accordance with Government Code section 66006(b)(2). Public Works Department staff recommends that the Board
accept the Report, make the findings included in the Report based on the information in the Report, and accept the fiscal years 2017/2018
through 2021/2022 information included in the Report, all in accordance with Government Code sections 66001(d) and 66006(b).
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The required findings would not be made and the required information would not be provided at this time.
ATTACHMENTS
South County AOB 5-Year Report
"Accredited by the American Public Works Association"
255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4825
TEL: (925) 313-2000 • FAX: (925) 313-2333
www.cccpublicworks.org
Brian M. Balbas, Director
Deputy Directors
Stephen Kowalewski, Chief
Allison Knapp
Warren Laia
Carrie Ricci
Joe Yee
ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON ___________________
Five-Year Program Report
for the
South County
Area of Benefit
October 2022
Prepared Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)
Prepared by and for:
Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering Division and
Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Divisio n
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
1 OF 10
I. INTRODUCTION
The South County Area of Benefit (South County AOB) is a traffic mitigation fee program
established for developers to contribute their fair share of the cost for transportation
improvements necessary to serve growth. On August 6, 1996, the Contra Costa County
Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 1996-27, as well as Resolution No.
1994/344, to update the Area of Benefit Program for the South County AOB.
Government Code section 66001(d)(1) require that in the fifth fiscal year following the
first deposit into the fund established for receipt of deposits of the collected transportation
mitigation fees, and every five years thereafter, the Board of Supervisors shall make all
of the following findings with respect to that portion of the South County AOB fund
remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
(1) Identify the purpose to which the transportation mitigation fees are to be put.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the transportation mitigation
fees and the purpose for which they are charged.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of
incomplete transportation improvements identified in the Report.
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph
three (3) above is expected to b e deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
Government Code section 66001(d)(2) requires the above findings to be made in
connection with providing the public information required by Government Code section
66006(b). Section 66006(b) requires the County to make the following fiscal year
information available within 180 days after the end of the fiscal year:
(1) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
(2) The amount of the fee.
(3) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
(4) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
2 OF 10
(5) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended
during the fiscal year and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was
funded with fees.
(6) An identification of the approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the County determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomp lete public improvement.
(7) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and in case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
(8) The amounts of any refunds under Section 66001 (e), and any allocations under
Section 66001(f).
This report is prepared to satisfy the above five-year finding and reporting requirements.
This report includes the findings that the Board of Supervisors is required to make under
Government Code section 66001(d)(1), and information in support of each of those
findings.
II. BACKGROUND
An “Area of Benefit” (AOB ) is a geographic area of unincorporated Contra Costa County
in which the County imposes transportation mitigation fees – a type of development
impact fee on new development to fund new development’s share of the transportation
improvements required to satisfy transportation demands within that geographic area.
(See Gov. Code, §§ 66484, 66484.7.) The County has 14 Areas of Benefit. This five-year
update report relates to the South County AOB. The South County AOB boundary location
is shown in Exhibit A.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
3 OF 10
The current fee structure is based upon the analysis published in the Development
Program Report for the South County Area of Benefit” dated August 1996. The
Development Program Report (DPR) is included as Exhibit 1 to Resolution No. 1996/344,
adopted by the Board of Supervisors on August 6, 1996.
Exhibit A. Area of Benefit Boundary Map
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
4 OF 10
The current South County AOB program includes a project list that consists of 2 projects,
focused upon safety and capacity improvements throughout the area (see Table 1).
Fee Rates
The fee rates established with O rdinance No. 1996-27 are listed below.
Land Use Type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $ 1,612 per dwelling unit
Other $ 1,612 per peak-hour trip
The Ordinance also allows for an annual fee adjustment. The current fee rates as of
March 1, 2022:
Land Use Type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $ 3,587 per dwelling unit
Other $ 3,587 per peak-hour trip
Projects Constructed
The following projects have been designed and partially constructed since 2017:
Camino Tassajara
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
5 OF 10
Table 1. South County Area of Benefit Project List
Cost estimates and fee rate calculations provided below are from the 1996
Development Program Report and, therefore, reflect dollar value s at the time of
adoption in 1996.
ID Project Description Potential AOB
Fee Contribution
1 Camino Tassajara Improve County portion to two lane rural highway standard $765,000
2 Crow Canyon Road Various safety and capacity improvements $60,000
TOTAL $825,000
Area of Benefit Share (as of 1996) $825,000
2% Administration (as of 1996) $16,500
Total Area of Benefit Revenue (as of 1996) $841,500
Potential Development (as of 1996) 522 Single Family
Residencies
Fee Per Unit (as of 1996) $1,612
Account Status
FY 2017/2018 Beginning Fund Balance – $2,912,166
Funds Expended on p rojects from FY 2017/2018–FY 2021/2022 – $761,130
Revenue generated between FY 2017/2018–FY 2021/2022 – $545,211
Fund Balance as of June 30, 2022 – $2,696,247
III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d)(1) FINDINGS
(1) Identify the purpose to which the transportation mitigation fees are to be put.
The purpose of the fee program is to fund new development’s share of the estimated
costs of the transportation improvements identified in the Development Program Report
(DPR) and shown in Table 1 (“Transportation Improvements”), pursuant to Government
Code sections 66484 and 66484.7. The Transportation Improvements are necessary to
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
6 OF 10
meet transportation demands within the South County AOB. The transportation
mitigation fees will be used to partially or entirely fund the Transportation Improvements
identified in the DPR, and included on Table 1, including costs related to planning,
engineering, administration, right-of-way acquisition, construction, or any other permits
or studies required through the construction process for the improvements. The Camino
Tassajara project identified in Table 1 was partially completed in 2019. Crow Canyon
Road has been annexed by the City of San Ramon ; thus, no remaining project exists
along this road. The remaining improvements along Camino Tassajara continues to
represent the future needs for the area and is the purpose of continuing the fee program.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the tr ansportation mitigation
fees and the purpose for which they are charged.
As further described in the DPR, the transportation mitigation fees are imposed to fund
new development’s proportional share of the Transportation Improvements that will serve
or mitigate the impact of transportation demands caused by new development within the
South County AOB. New development within the South County AOB will include new
single-family residential and multi-family residential dwelling units and new
commercial/retail, office, and industrial developments. Each of these types of
development generates vehicle trips at a certain rate. The transportation mitigation fees
represent new development’s proportional share of the cost of the Transportation
Improvements. Each new development project pays its fair share of the cost of the
Transportation Improvements required to accommodate it, based on the number of
equivalent dwelling units and trips generated. The transportation mitigation fee for each
new developm ent will be calculated based on a factor of the number of peak -hour vehicle
trips that will be generated by each new development project and charged on a per -
dwelling-unit or per-peak -hour-trip basis. The method of fee apportionment is based upon
industry standard trip generation rates per the Trip Generation Manual published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
7 OF 10
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing
of incomplete transportation improvements identified in the Report.
The Transportation Improvements within the South County AOB program will be partially
funded by AOB fee revenues. Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal aid, or
local funding sources, such as Measure J funds or gas tax revenues , will be pursued to
complete financing of these improvements .
The rate at which revenue is generated by transportation mitigation fees within the South
County AOB is dependent on the rate of new development. South County AOB revenue
generation, as well as gas tax revenue and grant funds, drive the timing of construction
of Transportation I mprovements because it is anticipated that most improvements will be
funded through a combination of all these funding sources .
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in paragraph
three (3) above is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or
fund.
The rate of revenue for capital improvements can vary based upon the economy and
political issues , so the anticipated dates for funding are estimated. The rate of
development is dependent on the economy and, thus, influences the rate of South County
AOB fee collections. Over the last five years approximately $545,000 in South County
AOB fees were collected. Federal, State, and local dollars can also be unpredictable.
Historically , the rate of gas tax revenue was relatively constant, but due to reduced
revenue resulting from fuel efficient vehicles and pending legislation, it is difficult to
predict the rate of matching funds for these projects in the future.
Grant funds are also difficult to predict as local agencies compete for funding. Awards are
not assured. Although the rate of funding is unpredictable, a very rough estimate over
the next five years for funding of circulation improvements on the South County AOB
project list is approximately $27,000,000 in public dollars from Local, State and Federal
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
8 OF 10
sources plus an estimated $3,000,000 from South County AOB. Although a prediction
cannot be made with certainty, it is anticipated that the County will receive sufficient
South County AOB and other revenues to complete the following project over the next
five years:
• Camino Tassajara Road Realignment : Project to realign and improve Camino
Tassajara within unincorporated Contra Costa County, and Tassajara Road within
the City of Dublin at the Contra Costa County/Alameda County Line, between
Windemere Parkway and Palisades Drive.
IV. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006(b)(1) INFORMATION FOR FY 2021/2022
As Section III of this report provided accounting information for the past five years,
Section IV provides annual reporting for fiscal year 202 1/2022. Full accounting will be
provided for South County AOB with the AB 1600 annual report (see Exhibit A), which is
provided to the Board of Supervisors within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year .
(1) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund
The South County AOB Fee is a development impact fee on new development to fund
new development’s share of the cost to construct road improvements to serve new
developments in the South County area of Contra Costa County. Requiring that all new
development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that they participate in the
cost of improving the road system.
(2) The amount of the fee
The fee rates for FY 2021/2022 as of January 2022:
Land Use Type Fee Per Unit
Single Family Residential $3,587 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $3,587 per dwelling unit
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
9 OF 10
Office OTHER per peak-hour trip
Industrial OTHER per peak-hour trip
Commercial/Retail OTHER per peak-hour trip
Other $3,587 per peak-hour trip
(3) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
FY 2021/2022 Beginning Fund Balance – $2,681,470
FY 2021/2022 Ending Fund Balance – $2,696,247
(4) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned
Developer Fees Collected – $10,761
Interest Earned – $7,605
(5) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended
during the fiscal year and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was
funded with fees.
No fees were expended on public improvements in this fiscal year.
(6) An identification of the approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the County determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
There is no approximate date to report.
(7) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and in case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
Five -Year Program Report
For the
South County Area of Benefit
10 OF 10
An interfund transfer or loan was not made from the fund.
(8) The amounts of any refunds under Section 66001(e), and any allocations under
Section 66001(f).
No refunds have been made to the fund.
V. CONCLUSION
The South County AOB program has generated revenue representing new development’s
proportional share of the cost of Transportation Improvements needed to mitigate
transportation impacts within the South County AOB. Over the past five years , one such
project ha s been partially constructed using a combination of South County AOB
transportation mitigation fee revenue and other local funds such as Measure J, Southwest
Area Transportation Committee (SWAT), Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC), and
gas tax. These funds have been used to fully fund the Camino Tassajara Bike Lane Gap
Closure p roject, which is a component of the Camino Tassajara project on the AOB project
list. Therefore, the County has made reasonable progress in implementing the
Transportation Impro vements included in the South County AOB program.
Looking forward to the next five years, it is anticipated that the Camino Tassajara project
will be fully constructed from the South County AOB project list using growth’s fair share
contribution of funding deposited in the South County AOB fund account. The remainder
of funds for the future projects will come from a combination of grants and local road
funds. The circulation needs for this area as detailed in the 1996 Development Program
Report remain. The current fund balance will be allocated to the project listed in Table 1.
G:\transeng\AOB\South County AOB\2022 Update\Final Report\5-Year Report South County AOB.docx
RECOMMENDATION(S):
(1) APPROVE plans, specifications, and design for the Danville Boulevard-Orchard Court Complete Streets Improvement Project, Alamo area.
County Project No. 0662-6R4128, Federal Project No. HSIPL-5928(140)
(2) DETERMINE that the bid submitted by Ghilotti Bros., Inc. (“Ghilotti”) exceeded the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal for
this project and that Ghilotti has submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid for this project.
(3) AWARD the construction contract for the above project to Ghilotti in the listed amount ($2,760,070.00) and the unit prices submitted in the
bid, and DIRECT that Ghilotti shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds, as indicated below, and that the Public Works Director, or
designee, shall prepare the contract.
(4) ORDER that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it, together with the bonds as noted below and any required
certificates of insurance or other required documents, and the Public Works Director has reviewed and found them to be sufficient, the Public
Works Director, or designee, is authorized to sign the contract for this Board.
(5) ORDER that, in accordance with the project specifications and/or upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, or designee,
bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be exonerated and any checks or cash submitted for security shall be returned.
(6) ORDER that, the Public Works Director, or designee, is authorized to sign any escrow agreements prepared for this project to permit the
direct payment of retentions into escrow or the substitution of securities for moneys withheld by the County to ensure performance under the
contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Adelina Huerta, 925.313.2305
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Construction Contract for the Danville Boulevard-Orchard Court Complete Streets Improvement Project, Alamo area.
RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
(7) AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to order changes or additions to the work pursuant to Public Contract Code section
20142.
(8) DELEGATE, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4114, to the Public Works Director, or designee, the Board’s functions under Public
Contract Code Sections 4107 and 4110.
(9) DELEGATE, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705, to the Public Works Director, or to any registered civil or structural engineer employed
by the County, the authority to accept detailed plans showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker
protection during trench excavation covered by that section.
(10) DECLARE that, should the award of the contract to Ghilotti be invalidated for any reason, the Board would not in any event have awarded
the contract to any other bidder, but instead would have exercised its discretion to reject all the bids received. Nothing in this Board Order shall
prevent the Board from re-awarding the contract to another bidder in cases where the successful bidder establishes a mistake, refuses to sign the
contract, or fails to furnish required bonds or insurance (see Public Contract Code Sections 5100-5107).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Project will be funded by 19% Measure J Regional Funds, 37% Highway Safety Improvement Grant Funds, and 44% Local Road Funds.
BACKGROUND:
The above project was previously approved by the Board of Supervisors, plans and specifications were filed with the Board, and bids were
invited by the Public Works Director. On November 17, 2022, the Public Works Department received bids from the following contractors:
BIDDER, TOTAL AMOUNT, BOND AMOUNTS
Ghilotti Bros., Inc.: $2,760,070.00; Payment: $2,760,070.00; Performance: $2,760,070.00
McGuire and Hester.: $ 2,859,773.00
Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc.: $2,910,604.00
Bay Cities Paving & grading, Inc.: $3,052,516.00
Redgwick Construction Company: $3,387,746.00
Kerex Engineering, Inc.: $3,776,225.00
The first bidder listed above, Ghilotti, submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid, which is $99,703.00 less than the next lowest bid.
This is a federally funded project subject to a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) contract goal and requirements. The Public Works
Director reports that the lowest monetary bidder, Ghilotti, attained DBE participation of 16.01% to meet the DBE goal (15.00%) and
requirements for this project. The Public Works Director recommends that the Board determine that Ghilotti has complied with the DBE
requirements for this project and recommends that the construction contract be awarded to Ghilotti.
The Board of Supervisors previously determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class
15301(c) Categorical Exemption, and a Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on September 19, 2018.
The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been filed with the Clerk of the Board, and
copies will be made available to any party upon request.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Construction of the project would be delayed, and the project might not be built.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 Dougherty Valley Maintenance County Service Area M-29 budget totaling $27,502,372 as
summarized in Exhibit 1, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% County Service Area M-29 Funds.
BACKGROUND:
Dougherty Valley is an 11,000 +/- unit development that was approved by and is being processed through Contra Costa County. This territory is
annexed into the City of San Ramon as Final Maps are approved, and improvements are accepted as complete. Dougherty Valley began
construction in 1996 and currently 100% of the homes have been annexed into San Ramon.
A 1994 Settlement Agreement allowed for the development of Dougherty Valley and laid out a plan to provide long-term operation and
maintenance of the increased municipal services provided in Dougherty Valley. These increased services include Police Protection, Park
Maintenance, Landscape Maintenance, Street Lighting, increased Library Services, and the operation and maintenance of 3 Community
Facilities Buildings (Community Center, Senior
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Jocelyn LaRocque- Engineering Services, Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Monica Nino- County Administrator , Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Michelle Gonsalves - Finance, Chris Low - City of
San Ramon, Candace Daniels - San Ramon Finance Manager, Francisco & Associates, Inc.
C. 5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget for Dougherty Valley Maintenance for County Service Area M-29, San Ramon
(Dougherty Valley) area.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Center, and Service Center).
In a 1997 Memorandum of Understanding between Contra Costa County and the City of San Ramon, it was decided that these increased
services would be provided by the City of San Ramon and reimbursed through property tax revenue and special assessment revenue. CSA
M-29 was created in 1998 to collect this property tax revenue and special assessment revenue from the properties within Dougherty Valley.
At the end of the fiscal year this property tax revenue and special assessment revenue is reimbursed to the City of San Ramon.
In addition, the Dougherty Valley Maintenance Budget includes other revenue generated from the properties within CSA M-29 which
include sales tax, real property transfer tax, fines and forfeitures, motor vehicle fees, permit fees, franchise fees, and contributions from the
City of San Ramon General Fund.
On December 20, 2005, the Board of Supervisors approved a Reimbursement Agreement between the County, the City of San Ramon,
Shapell Industries and Windemere BLC Land Company to provide reimbursement to the City of San Ramon for providing services within
the boundaries of Dougherty Valley.
The Reimbursement Agreement outlined the annual process for the City of San Ramon to receive reimbursement of funds for services
rendered in Dougherty Valley. The process laid out in the agreement calls for the annual budget for Dougherty Valley Maintenance to be
approved at the San Ramon City Council level and then subsequently approved at the County Board of Supervisors.
On May 24, 2022, by Resolution 2022-079, the San Ramon City Council approved the FY 2022/23 citywide operating and capital budgets
including line items for the Dougherty Valley Maintenance which totaled $27,502,372 in expenses.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Dougherty Valley Maintenance budget will not be approved and the City of San Ramon will not receive reimbursement for city
services performed in Dougherty Valley as agreed to under terms of the Reimbursement Agreement and the 1994 Settlement Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1, Dougherty Valley Maintenance FY 2022/23 Annual Budget
EXHIBIT 1
Actual Actual Actual Budget
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
REVENUE
I. CSA M-29 Tax/Assessment $14,648,163 $15,205,726 $15,443,995 $16,245,671
II. County Expenditures (1)
i.County Admin. Charge ($36,936)($38,783)($40,722)($42,758)
j. Assessment Collection Fees ($8,000)($8,000)($8,000)($8,000)
Subtotal County Expenditures ($44,936) ($46,783) ($48,722) ($50,758)
III. Remaining CSA M-29 Special Tax/Assessment Revenue $14,603,227 $15,158,943 $15,395,273 $16,194,913
REVENUE
I. Direct Revenues (excluding CSA M-29 Tax/Assessment)
a. CSA M-29 Advalorem Property Taxes $3,632,103 $3,797,614 $3,950,801 $4,331,142
b. Real Property Transfer Tax $291,093 $285,273 $303,266 $494,264
Subtotal $3,923,195 $4,082,888 $4,254,066 $4,825,406
II. Indirect Revenue (City of San Ramon Contribution)
a. Sales Tax $1,869,449 $1,942,710 $1,981,126 $2,084,013
b. Fines and Forfeitures $60,169 $36,057 $44,718 $92,133
c. Licenses/Permits/Franchise Fees $407,237 $442,118 $455,933 $504,023
d. Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Fees $738,410 $807,293 $1,006,565 $1,227,625
Subtotal $3,075,265 $3,228,179 $3,488,340 $3,907,795
III. CSA M-29 Special Tax/Assessment Revenue $14,603,227 $15,158,943 $15,395,273 $16,194,913
IV. San Ramon General Fund Contribution to cover GAP $2,512,967 $3,318,495 $4,671,197 $2,574,258
TOTAL AVAILABLE REVENUE $24,114,654 $25,788,504 $27,808,877 $27,502,372
EXPENDITURES
a. Internal Road Maintenance ($919,717) ($962,508) ($1,278,186) ($1,151,567)
b. Street Landscaping ($5,820,103) ($5,953,785) ($6,063,953) ($6,363,791)
c. Park Maintenance ($4,077,547) ($4,565,387) ($4,815,788) ($5,020,078)
d. Open Space Maintenance ($206,371) ($202,820) ($313,619) ($350,272)
e. Flood Control Services ($102,387) ($179,343) ($69,711) ($77,289)
f. Police Services ($9,219,062) ($9,764,174) ($10,634,135) ($9,966,519)
g. Community Facilities (no Library Operations) ($1,379,725) ($1,604,869) ($1,877,650) ($1,847,394)
h. Overhead to City @ 11% ($2,389,742) ($2,555,618) ($2,755,835) ($2,725,460)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ($24,114,654) ($25,788,504) ($27,808,877) ($27,502,372)
Dougherty Valley Maintenance
FY 2022-23 Annual Budget
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/405 accepting for recording purposes only an Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes for minor subdivision
MS20-00002, for a project being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Brentwood area.
(District III)
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes is required per Condition of Approval No. 49.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes will not be recorded and compliance with the requisite condition of approval will remain
unfulfilled.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben
Hernandez - DCD, Civic Park Balfour, LLC
C. 6
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Accepting for recording only an Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes for minor subdivision MS20-00002, Brentwood area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2022/405
Offer of Dedication - Road
Purposes
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2022/405
Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board
Return To:Public Works Dept- Simone Saleh
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 12/06/2022 by the following vote:
AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District
IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2022/405
IN THE MATTER OF accepting for recording purposes only an Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes for minor
subdivision MS20-00002, for a project being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works
Director, Brentwood area. (District III)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following instrument is hereby ACCEPTED ONLY:
INSTRUMENT: Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes
REFERENCE: 007-010-006
GRANTOR: Civic Park Balfour, LLC
AREA: Brentwood
DISTRICT: III
Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and
entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design &
Construction, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Civic Park Balfour, LLC
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/407 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS20-00002, for a project
being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Brentwood area. (District III)
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for minor subdivision MS20-00002 and has determined that all
conditions of approval for Parcel Map approval have been satisfied.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Parcel Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael
Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Civic Park Balfour, LLC, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
C. 7
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Approve the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS20-00002, Brentwood area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2022/407
Parcel Map
Subdivision Agreement & Improvement Security Bond
Tax Letter
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2022/407
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 12/06/2022 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2022/407
IN THE MATTER OF approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS20-00002, for a project
being developed by Civic Park Balfour, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Brentwood area. (District III)
WHERE AS, the following documents were presented for board approval this date:
I. Map
The Parcel Map of minor subdivision MS20-00002, property located in the Brentwood area, Supervisorial District III, said map
having been certified by the proper officials.
II. Subdivision Agreement
A subdivision agreement with Civic Park Balfour, LLC, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements
as required in said subdivision agreement within 2 year(s) from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision
agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows:
A. Cash Bond
Performance amount: $5,200.00
Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP 859667 Date: November 17, 2022
Submitted by: DeNova Homes, Inc.
B. Surety Bond
Bond Company: The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Bond Number: 070218969 Date: November 10, 2022
Performance Amount: $518,800.00
Labor & Materials Amount: $260,000.00
Principal: Civic Park Balfour, LLC
III. Tax Letter
Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in
said map and that the 2022-2023 tax lien has been paid in full and the 2023-2024 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of
January 2023, is estimated to be $2,530.00, with security guaranteeing payment of said tax lien as follows:
· Tax Surety
Bond Company: N/A
Auditor's Deposit Permit Number: DP859608 Date: November 16, 2022
Auditor's Deposit Permit Number: DP859608 Date: November 16, 2022
Amount: $2,530.00
Submitted by/Principal: Muhammad Abid
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the
County's general and specific plans.
2. That said map is APPROVED and this Board does hereby reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements
shown thereon as dedicated to public use.
3. That said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED.
Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design &
Construction, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Civic Park Balfour, LLC, The Ohio
Casualty Insurance Company
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation district, or designee, to execute,
on behalf of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, a contract amendment with Psomas, to extend the term through December 31, 2023, for
on-call geographic information system (GIS) technical support services, with no change to the payment limit, Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Contra Costa Clean Water Program (the “CCCWP”) consists of Contra Costa County, its 19 incorporated cities/towns and the Contra Costa
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Permittees”). The CCCWP was established in
1991 through a Program Agreement in response to the 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), which established a
framework for regulating municipal stormwater discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit
Program. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “USEPA”)
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Karin Graves, 925-313-2042
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 8
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE a Contract Amendment with Psomas for GIS Technical Support Services
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
published final rules implementing the 1987 CWA amendments in November 1990. The rules mandate that Permittees obtain and implement
stormwater permits designed to reduce and eliminate the discharge of pollutants into and from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (the
“MS4s”) they own and operate. Through the CCCWP, Permittees conduct many of the mandated activities collectively (referred to as “Group
Activities”), such as water quality monitoring, special studies, and public education. The roles and responsibilities of the CCCWP and
Permittees are outlined in the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Agreement, which was last updated and adopted by all Permittees in June
2010. The current San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit No. CAS612008, Order R2-2022-0018
(“Permit”), was issued in May of 2022.
Psomas is uniquely qualified to provides stormwater-related technical support and expertise for development, modification, customization, and
configuration of the geographic information system (GIS) tools, applications, maps, and reports along with other technical assistance. In order to
continue ongoing permit compliance activities, CCCWP staff, on behalf of the Permittees, respectfully request approval of this contract
amendment with Psomas to extend the term through December 31, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without the approval of the Board of Supervisors, the CCCWP, 19 Cities and Towns, Contra Costa County, and the Flood Control District will
be unable to meet the NPDES Permit requirements set forth by the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit
No. CAS612008, Order R2-2022-0018 .
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District), APPROVE
and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute an amendment to the agreement with the California Department of Water
Resources: Flood Emergency Response Projects Grant Program — Statewide, to extend the term through April 29, 2024, with no change in the
grant amount, Concord, Danville, Martinez, Pacheco, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, Rodeo, San Pablo, Richmond, and Walnut Creek areas.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount of the $374,000 grant from the State will not be increased. Any incidental costs associated with the project and not covered by the
grant will be paid for by Flood Control District funds (Project No. 7505-6F8117).
BACKGROUND:
In 2014, the County applied for and received a grant from the Department of Water Resources for $206,500 under the first round of the Flood
Emergency Response Projects Grant Program — Statewide: State Contract No. 4600012938. This grant was for 10 stream gauges to
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Mark Boucher, (925) 313-2274
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Mark Boucher, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control
C. 9
To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Amendment to the Agreement with the California Department of Water Resources: Flood Emergency Response Projects Grant
Program — Statewide.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
be installed on nonlegal Delta streams and for our RainMap webpage (www.cccounty.us/RainMap). The work on that project was
completed in December 2017. We were able to find cost savings for some materials and amend the grant agreement to add one stream
gauge for a total of 11 new stream gauges under that grant.
On February 4, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved a second grant agreement with the State of California in the amount of $374,000
for the establishment of flood-stage elevations at 12 of our stream gauges. We are continuing to perform records research, field and office
surveying, and computer modeling to establish the elevations at each stream gauge where we estimate flooding could occur in the general
area upstream and downstream of the stream gauges.
The established flood-stage elevations will be shown on plots on our RainMap so that the general public will be able to view the stream
stages and see how close to flood stage the streams are. It will heighten the public’s awareness of the stream conditions during areawide
flood watches that are proclaimed by the Department of Water Resources and/or the National Weather Service. We will also communicate
these flood stages and stream gauge information with the County Office of Emergency Services and other jurisdictions, such as cities and
park districts.
The Flood Control District requested, and the State Department of Water Resources agreed, that the agreement be amended to extend the
term one year due to a COVID-19 related start delay, staffing attrition, and staffing changes that reduced the availability of qualified staff to
work on the project.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without the Board of Supervisors’ approval, the Flood Control District may not be able to complete the grant funded project by the original
deadline and may be required to return grant funds already received for the project.
ATTACHMENTS
Amendment with CDWR
Agreement No. 4600012938
AMENDMENT 1
1
AMENDMENT 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
UNDER THE FLOOD EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROJECTS –
STATEWIDE GRANT ROUND 3
On April 29, 2020, the State of California Department of Water Resources (hereinafter called the
STATE), and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (hereinafter
called the FUNDING RECEIPIENT) entered into an Agreement for the purpose of improving local
flood emergency response. The project is designed to increase the capacity for locals to respond to
flood threats through enhancements to planning, training and equipment.
The STATE and FUNDING RECEIPIENT now desire to amend the April 29, 2020 Agreement.
The April 29, 2020 Agreement is hereby amended by this instrument, Amendment 1, to be effective
as of the date of execution. This Amendment is necessary to fulfill the intent and purpose of the April
29, 2020 Agreement.
The STATE and FUNDING RECEIPIENT hereby agree to the following modifications:
1. Section 2, Term of Funding Agreement, is replaced in its entirety with: “The term of this
Funding Agreement begins on the date this Funding Agreement is executed by the
State, through final payment plus three (3) years unless otherwise terminated or
amended as provided in this Agreement. However, all work shall be completed by April
29, 2024, and no funds may be requested after October 31, 2024.”.
2. Exhibit C, Schedule, is replaced in its entirety with the attached revised Exhibit C.
3. Revise Exhibit D, Standard Conditions, to add Paragraph D.48., Russia Sanctions
Executive Order: On March 4, 2022, the Governor issued Executive Order N-6-22 (the
EO) regarding Economic Sanctions against Russia and Russian entities and individuals.
The EO may be found at: https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22-
Russia-Ukraine-Executive-Order.pdf. “Economic Sanctions” refers to sanctions
imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as
any sanctions imposed under State law. The EO directs DWR to terminate funding
agreements with, and to refrain from entering any new agreements with, individuals or
entities that are determined to be a target of Economic Sanctions. Accordingly, should
the State determine that the Funding Recipient is a target of Economic Sanctions or is
Agreement No. 4600012938
AMENDMENT 1
2
conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be
grounds for termination of this Agreement. The State shall provide the Funding
Recipient advance written notice of such termination, allowing the Funding Recipient at
least 30 calendar days to provide a written response. Termination shall be at the sole
discretion of the State.
All other terms and conditions of the April 29, 2020 Agreement remain unchanged
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION
DISTRICT
By: ______________________________
Brian Balbas
Chief Engineer
Date: ____________________________
Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency
By: ______________________________
Michael George
Deputy County Counsel
Date: ______________________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
By: _______________________________
Jeremy Hill, Manager
Hydrology and Flood Operations Branch
Date: _____________________________
Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency
By: _______________________________For
Robin Brewer, Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Date: ______________________________
Agreement No. 4600012938
AMENDMENT 1
3
Exhibit C
Schedule
Table C1 — Schedule
Task Description Start Date Duration End Working
Days*
3 Year Agreement Limit 4/29/2020 1,095 4/29/2023 757
1 year Extention 4/29/2023 366 4/29/2024
5.0 Project Management 6/29/2020 1,206 10/18/2023 838
5.0 Kickoff Meetings 6/29/2020 29 7/28/2020 22
1.0 DATA COLLECTION 8/5/2020 947 3/10/2023 653
1.1 Field and Office Surveying 7/25/2021 555 1/31/2023 382
1.2 Engineering - Model Search 8/5/2020 329 6/30/2021 227
1.3 Interviews with Cities and Citizens 10/14/2020 387 9/15/2022 483
2.0 Engineering - Modeling 8/5/2020 999 5/1/2023 689
3.0 Website Programming 5/1/2023 10 5/11/2023 9
4.0 Outreach 5/11/2023 70 7/20/2023 51
5.0 Final Reporting and Invoicing 7/20/2023 90 10/18/2023 65
Float 10/18/2023 194 4/29/2024 139
*Working days exclude weekends and holidays.
Agreement No. 4600012938
AMENDMENT 1
4
Figure C1 – Schedule
RECOMMENDATION(S):
DENY claim filed by THC - Orange County, LLC (dba Kindred Hospital San Francisco Bay Area).
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
DENY claim filed by THC - Orange County, LLC (dba Kindred Hospital San Francisco Bay Area): Breach of contract claim for unreimbursed
medical treatment in the amount of $387,510.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Not acting on the claims could extend the claimants’ time limits to file actions against the County.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Risk Management
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C.10
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Claims
RECOMMENDATION(S):
DECLARE vacant Hazardous Materials Commission Business Seat 3 previously held by Don Bristol, and
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
The Hazardous Materials Commission was established in 1986 to advise the Board of Supervisors, County staff and the mayor’s council
members, and staffs of the cities within the County, on issues related to the development, approval and administration of the County Hazardous
Waste Management Plan. Specifically, the Board of Supervisors charged the Commission with drafting a hazardous materials storage and
transportation plan and ordinance, coordinating the implementation of the hazardous materials release response plan and inventory program,
and to analyze and develop recommendations regarding hazardous materials issues with consideration to broad public input, and report back to
the Board on Board referrals. The bylaws of the Commission provide that Business Seat 3 be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The term
of the seat expires on December 31, 2024.
Mr. Bristol vacated the seat due to personal reasons.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Michael Kent, (925) 250-3227
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C.11
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Declare Vacancy on the Hazardous Materials Commission
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The seat will remain unfilled, and this will potentially make it more difficult to achieve a quorum and will potentially lessen the viewpoint of
the Taxpayers Association in Commission deliberations.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Vacancy Notice
Contra
Costa
County
NOTICE
C.11
The Board of Supervisors will make appointments to fill existing advisory body
vacancies. Interested citizens may submit written applications for vacancies to the
following address:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
1025 Escobar Street, ist Floor
Martinez, CA 9455
Board , Commission , or Committee
Hazardous Materials Commission
Seat: Business Seat 3
A pp ointments will be made after
December 20, 2022
I, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator, hereby certify
that, in accordance with Section 54974 of the Government Code, the above notice of vacancy
(vacancies) will be posted on December 6, 2022.
cc : Hard Copy to Clerk of the Board Lobby
Hard Copy to Minutes File
Soft Copy .DOCX to M:\5-Notices and Postings
Soft Copy .PDF to $:\Minutes Attachments\Minutes 2020
Soft Copy .PDF to M:\1-Committee Files and Applications
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
Attested: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
And ~
By: rLWl.0v\_ tk&Q_
Deputy Clerk
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, medical staff
advancement, and voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive Committee, at their November 14, 2022 meeting, and
by the Health Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval for each
Medical Staff member be placed in his or her Credentials File. The above recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by
the Credentials Committee and approved by the Medical Executive Committee.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers' medical staff would not be appropriately
credentialed and not be in compliance with The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Gina Soleimanieh, 925-370-5182
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C.12
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – November 14, 2022
ATTACHMENTS
November List
Credentials Committee Recommendations 11/2/2022 1
A. Applications for Staff Membership
Applicant Department/ Speciality
Abdulhussein, Murtadha, MD Psychiatry/Psychology
Davis, Michelle, MD Emergency Medicine
Loeza, Joanna, MD OB/GYN
Mokhtare, Shahrzad, MD DFAM
Paul, Gregory, MD Psychiatry/Psychology
Sadarangani, Sonia, MD DFAM
B. Applications for Staff Affiliation
Applicant Department
Bailey, Karla, NP DFAM
Inton, Zosima, FNP DFAM
C. Provisional Staff: Evaluations
12 Month Evaluations
Provider Department
Scott, Sara. MD DFAM
Hill, Alexandra, MD Emergency
Tafoya, Chelsea, MD Emergency
Tafoya, Matthew, MD Emergency
Bhela, Serena, MD Internal Medicine/Neph
Shah, Amish, MD Internal Medicine/Pulm
D. Staff Advancing to Non-Provisional
Provider Department Staff Status
Elsenhimer, Kaitlin, MD OB/GYN Active
E. Biennial Reappointments
Provider Department Staff Status
Chu Fantini, Eveline, MD DFAM A
Graham, Oliver, MD Hospital Medicine A
Hiner, Sharon, MD Internal Medicine A
Van Handel, Mark, MD Internal Medicine A
Wang, Lili, MD Internal Medicine A
Bliss, Judith, MD OB/GYN A
CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER
AND HEALTH CENTERS
2500 Alhambra Avenue
Martinez, California 94553-3156
Ph 925-370-5000
ANNA M. ROTH, R.N., M.S., M.P.H.
HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR
SAMIR B. SHAH, M.D., F.A.C.S.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
AND HEALTH CENTERS
& CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES
Das, Shweta, MD Pathology A
Dogan, Ozge, MD Pediatrics A
Srivastav, Shivani, MD Pediatrics A
Styles, Sarah, DO Pediatrics C
Okoye, Uchenna, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A
Miller, Margaret, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A
Schwartz, David, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C
Beadles, Kevin, MD Surgery A
Gynn, Michael, MD Surgery A
Tang, Edward, MD Surgery A
Wirengard, Yana, MD Surgery A
F. Biennial Renewal of Privileges
Provider Department Staff Category
Longoria, Anthony, NP DFAM AFF
Moghaddam, Amennah, NP DFAM AFF
Murguia, Sandra, FNP OB/GYN AFF
Pak, Lauren, NP Pediatrics AFF
G. Biennial Reappointments for Teleradiologists (vRad)
Provider Department
Donohoo, Jay, MD Diagnostic Imaging
Pratt, Alan, MD Diagnostic Imaging
H. Voluntary Resignation
Provider Department
Johnson, Kermit, MD Psychiatry/Psychology
Kuruvilla, Pramita, MD Critical Care
Mandell, Joanna, MD DFAM
Miller, Laura, NP DFAM
Rayikanti, Benjamin, MD Anesthesia
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE Appropriation Adjustment No.005022 authorizing the transfer of current year appropriation of $1,750,000 from the Employment
and Human Services Department (EHSD) Administration Department to the Workforce Development Board (WDB), for the start-up and
on-going costs for the County Youth Centers, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On February 22, 2022 the Board of Supervisors approved the Measure X Sales Tax Revenue Allocation. Included in this board order, the
Employment and Human Services Department was identified to receive a budget of $1,750,000 for the start-up and on-going costs to operate 2
County Youth Centers, using Measure X funding. The funding was budgeted in the EHSD Administration budget. This Board Order seeks to
transfer that budget from the EHSD Administration Department to the EHSD Workforce Development Board.
BACKGROUND:
EHSD Administration (Admin) appropriations will be reduced by $1,750,000 and transferred to EHSD Workforce Development Board (WDB).
This consists of 100% Measure X funds budgeted in FY 22/23 and no additional County general fund costs will result from this adjustment.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Chris Dunn, 925-608-4859
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C.13
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Measure X Funding Transfer – EHSD – Administration to EHSD Workforce Development Board (WDB)
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Appropriations will not be properly allocated to operate Youth Centers, which are critical to vulnerable youth in at-risk communities.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
TC27_AP005022
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Approp Adj 5022
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No.005025 authorizing new revenue in the amount of $600,000 from Service Area P-6
funding and appropriating it in the Sheriff's Office (0255) Training Division (2501) for the purchase of Tasers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action increases revenues and appropriations by $600,000. There is no impact on the County General Fund. This purchase is to be funded
through Sheriff’s budget Org# 2501 using the Service Area P-6 Ad Valorem Property Tax fund.
BACKGROUND:
The Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff’s current stock of TASER Conducted Energy Weapon systems, Axon Enterprise’s X26P, has
reached its five-year recommended use life span and needs to be replaced. Per Axon, the X26P will soon be discontinued and no longer
manufactured due to its dated technology. The Office of the Sheriff would like to purchase the Taser 7, also manufactured by Axon Enterprises,
as a replacement of the X26P weapons systems. The Taser 7 is Axon Enterprise’s newest model and has improved technology and features that
are in more in line with today’s law enforcement industry standards. The Taser weapons system has proven to be an essential tool for the Office
of the Sheriff personnel, and has proven to be highly effective in subduing combative/assaultive subjects while reducing the potential for injury
to both the deputy and the suspect.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Heike Anderson, (925) 655-0023
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Heike Anderson, Alycia Rubio, Paul Reyes
C.14
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Appropriation Adjustment - Axon Tasers for Office of the Sheriff
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Failure to approve this appropriation adjustment could result in the Office of the Sheriff not being able to purchase equipment necessary to
ensure Public Safety.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
TC24/27 AP005025
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Approp Adj 5025
12/1/22
12/1/22
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25929 to establish the classifications of Respiratory Care Services Manager (VIGB) at salary plan
and grade ZA5-1012 with five steps ($9,470 - $11,512) and add one (1) position; Respiratory Care Services Supervisor (VIHB) at salary plan
and grade ZA5-1011 with five steps ($8,610 - $10,466) and add two (2) positions; Cardiology Services Manager (VIHC) at salary plan and
grade ZA5-1013 with five steps ($9,299 - $11,304) and add one (1) position; Abolish the classification of Assistant Chief Cardiopulmonary
Support Services (VIHA) at salary plan and grade ZA5-1819 ($8,616 - $10,473) and cancel one (1) vacant position #9594; Abolish the
classification of Chief, Cardiopulmonary Support Services (VIGA) at salary plan and grade ZA5-1732 ($7,905 - $9,608) and cancel one (1)
vacant position #7932; and cancel two (2) vacant Public Health Program Specialist I (VBSD) positions #9591 and #16126 at salary plan and
grade ZA5-1602 ($6,950 - $8,448), and cancel one (1) vacant Ambulatory Care Clinical Coordinator (VAHB) position #15676 at salary plan
and grade K65-1453 ($6,135 - $7,457) in the Health Services Department. (Represented)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Upon approval, the cancellation of vacant positions and termination of contract agency staff will fully offset the cost and result in an annual cost
savings of approximately $54,641 to the Hospital Enterprise Fund I.
BACKGROUND:
The Health Services Department is requesting to re-organize the Cardiopulmonary Support Services within Contra Costa Regional Medical
Center. Currently, the unit is a hybrid of therapeutic interventions and diagnostic services for both cardiac and pulmonary functions including the
administration of medical gases, aerosolized pharmacological agents and bland aerosol, chest percussion and postural draining, incentive
spirometry, airway care, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, echocardiography (cardiac sonography), cardiac stress tests,
electrocardiography (EKG), electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potentials, obstructive sleep apnea, blood gas drawing and analysis,
spirometry, lung volume, and bronchoscopy assisting. The unit has been managed by an Assistant Chief Cardiopulmonary Services and a
registry supervisory staff.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Samir Shah, Jaspreet Benepal , Faye Ny, Jo-Anne Linares, Sylvia Wong Tam
C.15
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Restructure the Cardiopulmonary Support Services unit in the Health Services Department
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
It is necessary to re-structure the cardiopulmonary services into two separate units as these are highly specialized and critical service
functions which require permanent management and daily supervision to ensure optimum patient care services. The Cardiology Services
Manager, the Respiratory Care Services Manager, and Respiratory Care Services Supervisors will focus on planning and organizing the
day-to-day operations, supervising staff, and coordinating the service functions of each unit.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the cardiology and respiratory services of CCRMC will not have permanent management staff to focus on the
service levels and operations of each specialized functions.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
P300 No. 25929 HSD
P300 No. 25929 Attachment A
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25929
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25929
DATE 3/1/2022
Department No./
Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6339 Agenc y No. A18
Action Requested: Revise, retitle, and realocate the Assistant Chief of Cardiopulmonary Support (V1HA) to Respiratory Care
Services Manager;establish the Cardiology Services Manager and add one position;. and Respiratory Care Services
Supervisor and add two positions; cancel Public Health Program Specialist I positions #9591 and #16126 and Ambulatory
Care Clinical Coordinator position #15676 in the Health Services Department .
Proposed Effective Date: 12/14/2022
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost ($54,641.00) Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY ($13,660.00) N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Cost Savings - Hospital Enterprise Fund I
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
Jo-Anne Linares
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Kaitlyn Jeffus for 4/11/2022
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Admini strator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/17/2022
See attachment A
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Date) Alycia Leach 11/17/2022
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 12/1/2022
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza
Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date No.
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs:
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c. financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25929 - Attachment A
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25929 to:
1. Establish the classifications of
a. Respiratory Care Services Manager (VIGB) at salary plan and grade ZA5 -1012 with five
steps ($9,470 - $11,512) and add one (1) position;
b. Respiratory Care Services Supervisor (VIHB) at salary plan and grade ZA5 -1011 with five
steps ($8,610 - $10,466) and add two (2) positions;
c. Cardiology Services Manager (VIHC) at salary plan and grade ZA5 -1013 with five steps
($9,299 - $11,304) and add one (1) position;
2. Abolish the classifications of
a. Assistant Chief Cardiopulmonary Support Services (VIHA) at salary plan and grade ZA5-
1819 ($8,616 - $10,473) and cancel one (1) vacant position #9594;
b. Chief, Cardiopulmonary Support Services (VIGA) at salary plan and grade ZA5-1732
($7,905 - $9,608) and cancel one (1) vacant position #7932;
3. Cancel two (2) vacant Public Health Program Specialist I (VBSD) positions #9591 and #16126 at
salary plan and grade ZA5-1602 ($6,950 - $8,448), and
4. Cancel one (1) vacant Ambulatory Care Clinical Coordinator (VAHB) position #15676 at salary
plan and grade K65-1453 ($6,135 - $7,457).
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25985 to reclassify one (1) Public Health Nutritionist (V9WB) (represented), position #8256, and
its incumbent (#80102) at salary plan and grade TC5-1430 ($5,861-$7,125) to Senior Public Health Nutritionist (V9TE) (represented) at salary
plan and grade TC5-1526 ($6,446-$7,835) in the Health Services Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is an increased cost of approximately $12,349, which includes approximately $3,149 in pension cost, and will be fully funded by the
Older Americans Act (OAA) adjustment funds.
BACKGROUND:
The Health Services Department is requesting to reclassify a Public Health Nutritionist and its incumbent to Senior Public Health Nutritionist
due to a series of desk audits that were conducted by Human Resources, which determined that the incumbent is performing duties and
responsibilities at the Senior Public Health Nutritionist level due to program expansion. The incumbent spends the majority of their time
managing all aspects of the congregate meal program at (17) senior centers, making on-site visits to evaluate the implementation of policies,
monitoring contractors for compliance with program regulations, representing the nutrition program before State and community agencies, and
coordinating special projects. These functions are most aligned with the Senior Public Health Nutritionist classification, and it is therefore
requested that the reclassification be approved.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the incumbent will not be appropriately compensated or classified.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Larita Clow, (925) 957-5244
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Larita Clow, dora regalado, Viviana Garcia, Jo-Anne Linares, Sylvia Wong-Tam
C.16
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Reclassify one Public Health Nutritionist position and its incumbent in the Health Services Department
AGENDA
ATTACHMENTS
P300 No. 25985 - HSD
MINUTES
ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25985
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25985
DATE 3/17/2022
Department No./
Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5766 Agency No. 18
Action Requested: Reclassify one (1) Public Health Nutritionist (V9WB) position number 8256 and its incumbent to Senior
Public Health Nutritionist (V9TE) in the Health Servic es Department. (Represented)
Proposed Effec tive Date: 7/1/2022
Classification Quest ionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary ) associated with request: $0
Estimated t otal cost adjus tment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $12,349 Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY $12,349 N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSE T ADJUSTMENT: 100% Older Americans Act (OAA) Adjustment Funds
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to C AO.
Use additional sheet fo r fu rther explanations o r comments.
Larita Clow
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RE SOURCES DEPARTMENT
Sarah Kennard for 6/29/2022
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/15/2022
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25985 to reclassify one (1) Public Health N utritionist (V9WB) position #8256 and
its incumbent (Employee #80102) at salary plan and grade TC5-1430 ($5,861-$7,125) to Senior Public Health Nutritionist
(V9TE) at salary plan and grade TC5-1526 ($6,446-$7,835) in the Health Services Department. (Repres ented)
Am end Resolution 71/17 establis hing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
12/1/2022(Date) Alycia Leach 11/15/2022
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RE COMMENDATION: DATE 12/1/2022
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Res ources
Disapprove Recomme nd ation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza
Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date __________ No. xxxxx
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s )
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a s pecified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s :
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implic ations
c . financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have cons idered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions m ust s ubmit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, whic h will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the dat e that your cost / benefit analy sis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s )?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current j ob
2. Non-County employ ee
Provide a jus tification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26071 to add one (1) Elections Services Supervisor (ALHB, represented) position at salary plan
and grade ZA5-1406 ($5,724-$6,957), for the limited period pending the announced retirement of an incumbent in the Elections Services
Supervisor classification in the Clerk-Recorder Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The increase cost of $27,831.72, will be offset by division vacancies, and are within the department's operating budget.
BACKGROUND:
In anticipation of the retirement of an incumbent Elections Services Supervisor, the Department requests the creation of a parallel position to
ensure adequate training and a smooth transition of divisional responsibilities. Upon the incumbent employee’s retirement in March of 2023, the
Department will cancel the current incumbent's Elections Services Supervisor position.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Candidate services provided by the Elections Division may become less responsive while the department allocates resources to training a new
supervisor without current capacity for mentorship.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Tyler Stull 925-335-7997
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Sylvia Wong Tam, Tyler Stull
C.17
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Deborah R. Cooper, Clerk-Recorder
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Add One (1) Limited Term Election Services Supervisor Position in Clerk-Recorder
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
P300 26071 Add limited term Elections Svcs Supv in
CCR
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 26071
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 26071
DATE 11/15/2022
Department No./
Department Clerk-Recorder-Elections Budget Unit No. 0043 Org No. 2353 Agency No. 024
Action Requested: Add one limited term (1) Elections Services Supervisor position (ALHB, represented), salary plan and
grade ZA5-1406 ($5,724-$6,957) to shadow retiring employee.
Proposed Effective Date: 12/1/2022
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $6,957.94 Net County Cost $6,957.94
Total this FY $27,831.72 N.C.C. this FY $27,831.72
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Costs are within the department's operating budget.
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
/s/ Julie Enea 11/15/2022
_ _
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26071 to add one (1) Elections Services Supervisor (ALHB, represented) position at salary plan
and grade ZA5-1406 ($5,724-$6,957), for the limited period pending the announced retirement of an incumbent Elections Services
Supervisor.
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Date)
Nancy Phetdaravanh _ 11/29/2022
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 11/22/2022
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie Enea
Other: _
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
11/29/2022
x
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date No.
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs:
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c. financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26074 to cancel one (1) vacant Network Technician II (LNVA) (represented) position #17662 at
salary plan and grade ZB5-1592 ($6,881 - $8,364), one (1) Information Systems Project Manager (LPNA) (represented) position #18827 at
salary plan and grade ZA5-1884 ($9,188 - $12,314), one (1) Information Systems Manager I (LTNA) (represented) position #17898 at salary
plan and grade ZA5-1884 ($9,188 - $12,314), one (1) Account Clerk Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position #14710 at salary plan
and grade 3RH-0755 ($3,924 - $4,864), and add one (1) Network Administrator II (LNSB) (represented) position at salary plan and grade
ZA5-1787 ($8,347- $10,146), one (1) Information Systems Manager II (LTNB) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZA5-2031
($10,628- $12,919), one (1) Information Systems Division Director (LTD1) (exempt) position at salary plan and grade B85-2212 ($12,719-
$15,460) in the Department of Information Technology.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of this request will be $11,640 annually. (100% User Departments)
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sarah Bunnell, (925) 608-4023
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Sarah Bunnell, Sylvia WongTam
C.18
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Marc Shorr, Chief Information Officer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Cancel IS Project Mgr, one Account Clerk Exp, one IS Mgr I, and one Network Tech II and add one Network Admin II, one IS
Mgr II, IS Div Dir
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Information Technology (DoIT) is engaged in an organizational and process review. The goal is to be more efficient and
align positions that are suitable to current tasks and workload. DoIT will be requesting positions to continue the reorganization during the
FY23/24 and FY24/25 budget processes. However, there is an immediate need to add a Network Administrator II, an Information Systems
Manager II, and Information Systems Division Director for Security positions Off-setting these costs will be the deletion of a Network
Technician II, an Information Systems Manager I, an Information Systems Project Manager I and an Account Clerk Experienced Level
position. The net annual cost will be $11,640. This can be absorbed and will be a better organization structure moving forward.
As security threats to our organization increase, the County's ability to provide services to the public and protect sensitive data is imperative.
DoIT is developing a security team that provides countywide capabilities to protect our systems and data. The Information Security Division
Director is needed to oversee the security programs day to day operations and personnel.
To meet the continued technical demand for Server Administration and Management of the Network End Point Services Team, DoIT
should have the correct level of expertise recruited to provide appropriate service expectations. This deletion of Network Technician II and
Information Systems Manager I and addition of Network Administrator II and Information Systems Manager II would allow for proper
recruitment and allocation of work.
The Accounting team has recently restructured tasks and positions. Workflows have been streamlined and the Account Clerk Experienced
Level is no longer needed.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Department will not have the desired classifications to provide exceptional services in the Network End
Point, Enterprise and Security Divisions.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A_P300 26074_HR Recommendations.docx
AIR 51735_P300 26074_ Multiple Pos_BOS 12.6.22
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 26074
Human Resources Department Recommendations
Cancel one (1) vacant Network Technician II (LNVA) (represented) position #17662 at salary plan and grade ZB5 -
1592 ($6,881 - $8,364), one (1) Information Systems Project Manager (LPNA) (represented) position #18827 at
salary plan and grade ZA5 -1884 ($9,188 - $12,314), one (1) Information Systems Manager I (LTNA) (represented)
position #17898 at salary plan and grade ZA5 -1884 ($9,188 - $12,314), one (1) Account Clerk Experienced Level
(JDVC) (represented) position #14710 at salary plan and grade 3RH -0755 ($3,924 - $4,864) and add one (1)
Network Administrator II (LNSB) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZA5 -1787 ($8,347- $10,146), one (1)
Information Systems Manager II (LTNB) (represented) position at salary plan and grade ZA5 -2031 ($10,628 -
$12,919), one (1) Information Systems Division Director (LTD1) (exempt) position at salary plan and grade B85 -2212
($12,719- $15,460) in the Department of Information Technology.
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 26074
DATE 11/4/2022
Department No./
Department Department of Information Technology Budget Unit No. 0147 Org No. 1050 Agency No. 03
Action Requested: Delete one Network Technician II (LNVA), Information Systems Manager I (LTNA), Info Systems Project
Manager (LPNA) and one Account Clerk Experienced Level (JDVC) pos. numbers 17662, 17898, 18827 and 14710 and Add
one Network Administrator II (LNSB), one Information Systems Manager II (LTNB) and one Info Sys Division Director (LTD1).
Proposed Effective Date: 11/30/2022
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: 0
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost ($11,640.00) Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY ($5,820.00) N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
Sarah Bunnell
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Jason Chan 11/21/2022
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/21/2022
See attachment A
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Date) Amanda Monson 11/21/22
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date 11/21/2022 No.
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s :
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c . financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a lease with United States Postal Service for a term of two
years, effective January 1, 2023, for approximately 1,763 square feet of office and 460 square feet of storage space for a total of 2,223 square
feet for the Office of the Sheriff – Court Security, located at 815 Court Street, Martinez, at an annual rent of $41,217 with no increases.
AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to sign the Real Estate Conflict of Interest Certification on behalf of the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Office of the Sheriff - #2591 (100% General Fund)
BACKGROUND:
The Office of the Sheriff has occupied this space since 2007. The current lease for this space will expire on December 31, 2022. The lease has a
five-year renewal option but this division of the Office of the Sheriff – Court Security – is scheduled to relocate to the new Administration
Annex Building at 651 Pine Street when construction of the new building is completed, which is expected to occur in the second quarter of
2024. To avoid paying for extra time in the existing space, this new lease will allow the Sheriff to remain in the current space for a two-year
term, beginning January 1, 2023, with a right to terminate with a 60-day notice that can be exercised any time during the second year (2024).
The termination option will provide the Sheriff flexibility in 2024, in the event the new building is not completed on schedule.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Margaret Eychner, 925-957-2463
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C.19
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:815 Court Street, Martinez – Lease for Office of the Sheriff – Court Security
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Office of the Sheriff would need to exercise their five-year option to renew the existing lease and would have to pay for time in this
space that will not be needed.
ATTACHMENTS
Conflict of Interest
Outlease Renewal
Facility Name:__________________________ Fin/Sub No._____________________
Address: ______________________________ City, ST, ZIP:___________________
Effective March 1, 2014 (Revision 2) Appendix A_Conflict of Interest Certification
Real Estate Conflict of Interest Certification
To avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest, the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”)
requires the following certification from you as a potential Tenant/Landlord/Licensor/Supplier/Contractor
to the Postal Service. Please check all that apply in item A below. Further, please understand that the
Postal Service will be relying on the accuracy of the statements made by you in this certification in
determining whether to proceed with any possible transaction with you.
I, _____________________________________ hereby certify to the Postal Service as follows:
[PRINT: name of potential Tenant/Landlord/ Licensor/Supplier/Contractor]
A. (Check all that apply) I am:
(i) _______A Postal Service employee;
(ii) ______The spouse of a Postal Service employee;
(iii) ______A family member of a Postal Service employee; (Relationship) _________________
(iv) ______An individual residing in the same household as a Postal Service employee;
(v) ______I am one of the individuals listed in (i) through (iv) above AND a controlling shareholder
or owner of a business organization leasing or licensing space or intending to lease or license
space to/from the Postal Service; OR
(vi) _____ None of the above.
B. (Complete as applicable):
i. I have the following job with the Postal Service(Title) ___________________________
(Location)__________________________________
ii. My Spouse who works for the Postal Service holds the following job:
(Title) ___________________________ (Location)__________________________________
iii. My family member who works for the Postal Service holds the following job:
(Title) ___________________________ (Location)__________________________________
iv. My household member who works for the Postal Service holds the following job:
(Title) ___________________________ (Location)__________________________________
C. If you have checked “none of the above” and during the lease or license term or any renewal
term, you do fall into any of the categories listed in A (i) through (v) above, you shall notify the
Postal Service Contracting Officer in writing within 30 days of the date you fall into any of the
such categories and shall include an explanation of which of the above categories now applies.
D. The person signing this certification has full power of authority to bind the potential
Tenant/Landlord/ Supplier/Contractor named above.
Executed this _____ day of ________, 20___ by
BY:___________________________________
[Insert Signature]
BY:___________________________________
[PRINT: name of entity or person]
Title:__________________________________
[Insert title]
Facility Name:__________________________ Fin/Sub No._____________________
Address: ______________________________ City, ST, ZIP:___________________
Effective March 1, 2014 (Revision 2) Appendix A_Conflict of Interest Certification
[INTERNAL USE ONLY: 1) If A(vi) ‘none of the above’ is selected, stop, file form with the lease/license/out-
sublease. 2) If other items are selected, submit form to Ethics.help@usps.gov. File form and Ethics determination
with the lease/license/out-sublease.]
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Facility Name/Location Finance/Sublocation No. Project Number:
Martinez Court Street Station 054782-G01
815 Court Street
Martinez, CA 94553-9991
THIS OUTLEASE AGREEMENT (“Outlease”), is entered into by and between the UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE, hereinafter called Lessor, and County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California,
hereinafter called the Lessee, whose address is 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553, to use and occupy the property
hereinafter described under the terms and subject to the conditions contained herein.
1. Premises: In consideration of the rents, covenants and agreements hereinafter on the part of Lessee to pay, keep, and
perform, the Lessor does demise and lease to the Lessee and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, the following
described premises (the "Premises"): The Premises are located in a building (the "Building") having a municipal
address of 815 Court Street, Martinez, CA 94553-9991. The Premises are located on site and the approximate
location as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. The parties agree that the rentable area
of the Premises is approximately 2,223 square feet (including 1,763 SF of office space plus 460 SF of storage space).
2. Outlease Term: The fixed term of this Outlease shall begin on January 1, 2023 (“Outlease Commencement Date”)
and end on December 31, 2024, unless terminated prior thereto pursuant to the terms hereof (hereinafter referred to
as the “Outlease Term”).
3. Rental Rate: Beginning on the Outlease Commencement Date and for each calendar month, Lessee shall pay the
Lessor rent (“Rent”), as set out in the schedule below, which shall be due and payable on a monthly basis in advance,
without demand or set-off.
The rental rate is determined as a combination of office space and storage space. The first-year annual rent is
calculated as follows.
a. Office: 1,763 SF x $21.00 = $36,456.00
b. Storage: 460 SF x $10.35 = $4,761.00
c. Total: $41,217.00
3a.
Months Monthly Rent Annual Rent
01/01/2023 – 12/31/2024 $3,434.75 $41,217.00
There is no security deposit being carried forward.
All payments shall be made payable to the “Disbursing Officer, USPS”, and shall contain the following identification
number: 054782-G01.
All Rent payments are due and payable on the 1st of each month (“Rent Due Date”) in accordance with the above
schedule and should be delivered to the Accounting Service Center, US Postal Service, Disbursing Office, P.O. Box
21888, Eagan MN 55121-0888. If Lessee fails to pay the Rent or any other payment due to Lessor within 10
calendar days after the Rent Due Date, then (without limiting Lessor’s rights and remedies including without
limitation Section 20 below) Lessee shall pay Lessor a late fee of ten percent (10%) of the amount of such
payment for each and every instance during the Outlease Term and any Renewal Term, if any, that Rent is not
paid on the Rent Due Date.
4. Renewal Option(s): None.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
5. Termination: Lessor has the right to terminate and reclaim the Premises at no cost or liability to Lessor by providing
Lessee 60 days’ written notice. Lessee has the right to terminate at no cost to Lessee by providing Lessor 60 days’
written notice. Lessee’s termination right may only be exercised in the second year of the 2 (two) year term. Such
termination shall become effective on the date set forth in such notice.
6. Use: Lessee shall use the Premises exclusively for: County Activities – Office of the Sheriff. Lessee shall use
reasonable care in the occupation and use of the Premises and shall not interfere with Lessor’s operations. Lessee,
Lessee’s agents, employees, invitees and visitors may use the Premises only for lawful purposes consistent with the
requirements of applicable laws, codes and regulations, and shall comply fully with the Rules and Regulations
Governing Conduct on Postal Property, 39 C.F.R., Part 232, promulgated by Lessor, attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit C (“Lessor Rules”) which may be revised from time to time. Lessee agrees not to use the Premises
in any way which, in the reasonable judgment of the Lessor, poses a hazard to the Lessor, or other tenants or occupants
in the Building, the general public, the Premises or the Building in part or whole. Lessee will not use or occupy the
Premises for any disorderly, unlawful or extra-hazardous purposes, or for any purpose that will constitute waste,
nuisance or unreasonable annoyance to Lessor or other tenants or occupants of the Building or the general public, or
for any purpose prohibited by Lessor’s Rules.
7. Inspection: Lessee has inspected and knows the condition of the Premises and agrees to accept same in its ‘as is’
condition including wear and tear thereafter, with all faults, including defects seen and unseen and all conditions natural
and artificial and including environmental conditions, without any representation of any kind, express or implied.
Lessee accepts all responsibility to inspect the Premises for patent and latent defects and in entering into this Outlease,
Lessee has not been induced by, and has not relied upon, any representations, warranties, or statements, whether
express or implied by Lessor, or any agent, employee, or representative of Lessor that are not expressly set forth herein.
Lessee’s decision to lease the Premises is based solely upon lessee’s own inspection, examination and analysis of the
Premises. It is further understood that Lessor shall have no liability to Lessee for the condition of the Premises and
Lessor leases the Premises to Lessee without any obligation on the part of Lessor to make any additions, improvements
or alterations thereto.
8. Indemnification: Lessor shall not be responsible for damages to property or injuries to persons which may arise from
or be incident to the use and occupation of the leased Premises, nor for damages to the property or injuries to the
person of Lessee or of others who may be on said Premises at Lessee’s invitation. Lessee shall indemnify, release and
hold Lessor harmless from liability for any and all claims for such damages or injuries to the property, the Premises,
or to any persons.
9. Repairs, Alterations and Improvements: Lessee shall not make any additions, improvements, repairs, or alterations
to the Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor in each and every instance. If this provision is violated,
Lessee is liable for the cost of removal and restoration, plus applicable administrative cost. In the event the Lessor
consents to the Lessee making any additions, improvements, repairs, or alterations to the Premises, Lessee shall remain
liable for the cost of removal and restoration in accordance with Section 11 below, plus applicable administrative cost.
Lessee acknowledges that the building is historic and that Lessor is thus subject to certain requirements under the
National Historical Preservation Act (“NHPA”) and approval of the State Historic Preservation Office (“SHPO).
Lessor’s consent, if granted, for any repairs, alterations or improvements under this Section 9 will be conditioned upon
Lessor’s ability to satisfactorily comply with various requirements of the NHPA and its implementing regulations,
including, without limitation, completion of the process under Section 106 of the regulations implementing the NHPA,
which compliance shall be at the sole cost and expense of the Lessee. Such compliance and resulting restrictions, if
any, on repairs and/or alterations or improvements, shall not be deemed to be unreasonable withholding, conditioning
or delay of consent.
10. Maintenance: Lessee shall at its sole cost and expense, maintain in good repair and tenantable condition the Premises
which shall include but is not limited to: 1) interior window coverings; 2) walls; 3) floors, floor tiles, and coverings;
4) lights, bulbs, lighting, fixtures; 5) telecommunication services and data services; and 6) Lessee’s alterations and
Improvements, if any. Lessee shall also be responsible for cosmetic repairs including but not limited to repair and
replacement of the carpet, wall and window coverings and painting in the Premises. In the event Lessee fails to
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
maintain the Premises, the Lessor may engage in maintenance and repair of the Premises at Lessee’s expense. Lessee
shall reimburse the Postal Service for all such costs of maintenance and repair plus applicable administrative costs
within ten (10) business days of a request therefor from the Lessor.
Lessor shall, except as otherwise specified herein and except for damages resulting from the act or omissions or the
negligence of the Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors, licensees, or invitees, maintain in good repair and
tenantable condition the Building shell elements which include: the foundation, roof, structure, and base building
systems that service the Premises which include the heating, cooling and ventilation for the building (“HVAC”),
electrical, plumbing and life safety systems for the Building, and any and all equipment, fixtures, and appurtenances,
whether severable or nonseverable, furnished by the Lessor under this Outlease.
Janitorial: Lessee is responsible for janitorial services which includes trash removal within the Premises at Lessee’s
sole cost and expense.
Snow removal: Lessor is responsible for snow and ice removal from sidewalks and entranceways and if parking is
part of the Premises, from parking lots, driveways and drive aisles.
11. Surrender and Restoration:
a. Lessee assumes all responsibility and liability to restore the Premises. Upon the expiration, or early termination of
this Outlease, Lessee shall at its sole costs and expense (i) vacate the Premises, (ii) remove its personal property
therefrom, (iii) yield and place Lessor in peaceful possession of the Premises, free and clear of any liens, claims or
encumbrances caused by Lessee and (iv) restore the Premises to “broom clean” condition and to as good as a
condition that the Premises existed at the commencement of this Outlease, including, without limitation, removal
of any alterations, Improvements or additions Lessee made to the Premises which the Lessor requests Lessee to
remove, ordinary wear and tear and damage by the elements excepted.
b. In the event Lessee fails to remove its personal property and such alterations, Improvements or additions as may be
required to be removed, and restore the Premises to the aforesaid condition stated in this Section 11a. by the
expiration or earlier termination of the Term or Renewal Term, (i) then upon Lessor notice to Lessee, such failure
shall constitute Lessee’s abandonment of all property (personal or otherwise) and items in the Premises, and Lessor
may restore the Premises which may include removal of such items and disposal of the same in any manner Lessor
deems appropriate, include through sale by such means and on such terms as Lessor determines appropriate, and
without further notice and without any liability or obligation to Lessor; and (ii) Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for
all costs of such removal, storage, disposal and restoration of the Premises plus applicable administrative costs,
upon demand. If Lessee shall fail to so vacate and surrender the Premises to Lessor as aforesaid on or before the
expiration of the Outlease Term or any earlier termination date, in addition to any and all remedies that Lessor may
have at law or at equity, Lessee shall be deemed to be a holdover tenant.
12. Sublease and Assignment:
Lessee shall have no right to assign or sublease this Outlease. Lessee shall neither transfer, nor assign this Outlease or
any of its rights hereunder, nor sublet the Premises or any part thereof or any property thereon nor grant any interest,
privilege or license whatsoever in connection with this Outlease. Any transfer, assignment, or sublease in violation of
this clause shall constitute an Event of Default under Section 20.
13. Taxes and Other Reimbursable Charges: In the event that any tax which shall include but is not limited to a state
or local tax or sales tax, is imposed upon the occupancy, use, possession, or leasehold interest of or in the real property
herein leased, the obligation for the payment of the tax will be wholly that of the Lessee. Lessee shall pay the same
when due without offset or deduction to payments due to the Lessor. In addition, the taxing authority shall provide
evidence of such payment to Lessor.
14. Insurance:
a. If the Premises or any part of the Premises is damaged by fire or other casualty resulting from any act or
negligence of Lessee or any of Lessee's agents, contractors, invitees, licensees, or employees, rent shall not be
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
diminished or abated while such damages are under repair, and Lessee shall be responsible for the costs of
repair not covered by insurance.
b. Lessee shall obtain and furnish to Lessor, at no cost to the Lessor, not later than the Outlease Commencement
Date, a commercial general liability insurance policy naming Lessor as an additional named insured. Lessee’s
insurance coverage must meet the following minimum requirements:
1) Commercial General Liability Limits
a. Each Occurrence: $1,000,000
b. Damage to Rented Premises: $250,000 (each occurrence)
c. Medical Expense: N/A
d. Personal & Advertising Injury: N/A
e. General Aggregate: $2,000,000
The certificate must include the following language under the “Description of Operations” section at the
bottom of the certificate: “Written notice must be provided to the United States Postal Service within thirty
(30) days of the effective date of any reduction in coverage under, or termination or cancellation of, any of the
policies described herein.”
c. Lessee shall maintain insurance throughout the Outlease Term and any renewal thereof and furnish a copy of
the Certificate to the Lessor upon request and on no less than an annual basis to the Real Estate Specialist at
the following address: USPS, Attn: Sean M. Ford, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW, Room 6670, Washington, DC
20260-1862. Failure to provide and maintain the aforementioned insurance policy, with the required
endorsement, in accordance with this section may result in termination of this Outlease at the option of the
Lessor.
d. In all cases wherein Federal, state or local governmental bodies are asserting they are self-insured, Lessor at
its option may approve in writing a waiver of the Insurance requirements in this Section 14. Lessee shall
provide Lessor with documentation that is acceptable to Lessor in its sole and absolute discretion of evidence
of such self-insurance prior to Lessee’s occupancy to satisfy the obligations of this section 14.
15. Utilities: Except for telephone and/or other telecommunication services which includes, but is not limited to, internet
and cable services which are Lessee’s responsibility, Lessor shall furnish Lessee with all utilities as presently installed
in its as-is condition that serve the Premises. Lessor’s responsibility includes payment of the utility bills from the
service providers. Utilities will include electricity, gas, water and sewer for the Premises.
16. Signs: Lessee, at Lessee’s sole cost and expense is permitted to install signage identifying Lessee’s name and office
location on the Building or on the outside of the Building. All aspects of such signage which includes but is not limited
to the location of the placement of the signage on the Building shall be subject to Lessor’s prior written approval and
shall be installed in compliance with all Laws hereinafter defined. Lessee shall insure, maintain in good condition and
repair such signs. At the expiration or earlier termination of the Outlease Term, including any Renewal Term, Lessee
shall cause such signs to be removed, all damage associated therewith to be repaired and the area restored in accordance
with Section 11, at Lessee’s sole cost and expense. If Lessee fails to so remove and restore, Lessee shall be liable for
the cost of removal and restoration, plus applicable administrative costs.
17. Entry: The Lessor reserves the right to enter the Premises at all reasonable hours to inspect it, show same or to make
such repairs, additions or alterations as Lessor considers necessary. Exercise of any such right in accordance with the
terms of this Section 17 shall not be considered a constructive eviction or a disturbance of Lessee's business or
occupancy. Lessor shall provide Lessee with at least 24 hours prior notice of such entry, provided, however, that
Lessor shall have the right to enter the Premises without prior notice in the event of an emergency.
18. Parking: Lessee shall have access to 0 reserved parking spaces.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
19. Building Hours & Access: The Building’s normal hours of operation are from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM, local time,
Monday through Friday, with the exception of Federal holidays (“Building’s Normal Operating Hours”). Access to
the Premises is generally available to Lessee 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, 365 days per year, subject to causes
beyond the reasonable control of Lessor and subject to change by Lessor.
The parties understand that from time to time and in emergency situations, the Lessor, at its own discretion, may be
unable to allow or provide access to the Premises on a 24 hour a day, 7 day a week, 365 days per year basis, and may
be unable to provide advance notice of such. In no event shall Lessor be liable to Lessee, its invitees, or other third
parties for any damages or losses based on its failure to provide access to the Premises in the case of such emergency.
However, to the extent that Lessor is unable to provide uninterrupted access to the Lessee during its Building Normal
Operating Hours, the Lessee may be entitled to a rent abatement that is proportionate to the amount of time during
which its access is so interrupted, unless such interruption is due to fire or other casualty, Acts of God, acts of a public
enemy, riot or insurrection, vandalism, or other similar events or due to the negligent act or omission of Lessee, its
agents, contractors, invitees, licensees, or employees.
20. Default by Lessee: The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute a default and breach of
this Outlease by Lessee (hereinafter “Event of “Default”): (i) Lessee fails to make any payment of Rent on the Rent
Due Date or any other payment required to be made by the Lessee under this Outlease, when due, and such failure shall
continue for a period of ten (10) days after Lessor has given Lessee written notice of such failure; or (ii) Lessee
abandons the Premises for thirty days or more, or fails to observe or perform any term, covenant, condition or the
provisions of this Outlease required to be observed or performed by Lessee, where such failure is not cured to the full
satisfaction of the Lessor within 30 days after written notice by the Lessor to Lessee of said failure Upon such Event of
Default by Lessee, the Lessor, at its option, without further notice or demand, shall have the right to any one or more of
the following remedies in addition to all other rights and remedies provided at law or in equity or elsewhere herein: (a)
declare this Outlease ended and terminated and may re-enter the Premises and remove all persons or things therefrom,
and the Lessee hereby expressly waives all service of any demand or notice prescribed by any law or statute
whatsoever; and (b) Lessor may enter the Premises and eject Lessee, forcibly or otherwise, without regard to any law
or statute to the contrary, dispose of Lessee’s personal property in the Premises as deemed in the best interest of the
Lessor, and Lessee shall be liable for such damages as Lessor may incur.
21. Quiet Possession: Lessor covenants and warrants that upon performance by Lessee of its obligations hereunder,
Lessor will keep Lessee in exclusive, quiet, peaceable and undisturbed and uninterrupted possession of the Premises
during the term of this Outlease.
22. Recording: This Outlease shall not be recorded.
23. Notice: Any notice, or advice to or demand given hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be sent by certified mail
with return receipt or express mail with tracking, provided, however, that electronic notice shall be permitted provided
that such electronic notice is confirmed by return electronic mail acknowledgement from the recipient and is followed
by notice given by one of the other methods listed above. Notice shall be deemed to have been given or made on the
day when the notice is deposited in the mail by certified mail/return receipt requested or express mail with tracking or
the date of the electronic submission to the following addresses or to such other address as either party may hereafter
from time to time specify in writing for such purpose.
If to Lessee: Contra Costa County
Public Works Department
Attn: Principal Real Property Agent
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553
If to Lessor: Sean Ford, Real Estate Specialist
475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW, Room 6670
Washington, DC 20260-1862
24. Compliance with Environmental Laws:
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
a. Definitions.
“Environmental Laws” mean all federal, state or local statutes, laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, relating
to protection of human health or the environment, including but not limited to (i) all laws relating to the release
of Hazardous Materials into the air, surface water, groundwater or land, or relating to the reporting, investigation
or remediation of, licensing, manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or
handling of Hazardous Materials; (ii) all laws pertaining to the protection of the health and safety of employees;
and (iii) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42
U.S.C. §9601 et seq.; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act as amended 49 U.S.C. §1801 et seq.; the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended 42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq.; and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.
“Hazardous Materials” mean (i) any toxic substance or hazardous waste, substance or related material, or any
pollutant or contaminant that is or may hereafter be defined as or included in the definition of “hazardous
substances,” “toxic substances,” “hazardous materials,” “hazardous waste” or words of similar import under any
and all Environmental Laws; (ii) petroleum, radon gas, asbestos in any form that is or could become friable, urea
formaldehyde foam insulation, transformers or other equipment that contain dielectric fluid containing levels of
polychlorinated biphenyls in excess of federal, state or local safety guidelines, whichever are more stringent; and
(iii) any substance, gas material or chemical that is or may hereafter be defined as or included in the definition
of “hazardous substances,” “toxic substances,” “hazardous materials,” “hazardous waste” or words of similar
import under any Environmental Laws.
b. Lessee shall comply with Environmental Laws in the use and occupancy of the Premises. Lessee will not cause or
permit the storage, use, generation, or disposition of any Hazardous Materials in, on, or about the Premises and
the Building, by Lessee, its agents, employees, or contractors, except in such small amounts as are necessary to
conduct Lessee’s normal business operations (e.g., cleaning products, inks and toners, and pest control products).
Lessee shall not permit the Premises to be used or operated in any manner that may cause the Premises or the
Building to be contaminated by any Hazardous Materials in violation of any Environmental Laws. Lessee will
immediately advise the Lessor in writing of (i) any and all enforcement, cleanup, remedial, removal, or other
governmental or regulatory actions instituted, completed, or threatened pursuant to any Environmental Laws
relating to any Hazardous Materials affecting the Premises; and (ii) all claims made or threatened by any third
party against Lessee, Lessor, or the Premises relating to damage, contribution, cost recovery, compensation, loss,
or injury resulting from any Hazardous Materials on or about the Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the
event any activity of Lessee involves storage on the Premises, shipping to or from the Premises or any use on the
Premises of a material, chemical or agent that qualifies as a Hazardous Material under Environmental Laws, Lessee
may request Lessor’s consent to permit use of such Hazardous Materials on the Premises, which is subject to
Lessor’s written approval which Lessor may approve or deny in its sole and absolute discretion. If Lessor approves
the use of Hazardous Materials, then Lessee shall comply with all Environmental Laws and shall provide the
Contracting Officer with copies of all licenses, permits or authorizations for the use, shipment, storage or transport
of the Hazardous Materials as well as copies of any citations or listing of infractions and subsequent corrections
by the Lessee. Copies of any changes in any and all licenses or permits must be forwarded to the Contracting
Officer. Where more than one environmental law applies, the more stringent shall apply. If any Environmental
Laws require the filing of periodic reports by the Lessee, it shall be the obligation of Lessee under this Outlease to
file a copy of any such periodic report(s) with the Lessor’s Contracting Officer at the same time such report(s) is
filed with the federal, state or local government or its assignee.
c. Lessor reserves the right to inspect the Premises at any reasonable time to ascertain if any Outlease violations
occur. If any contamination, violation or hazardous condition, as reasonably determined by the Contracting
Officer, occurs due to the handling, use, storage or transfer by Lessee of such Hazardous Materials, whether such
contamination, violation or hazardous condition is discovered during the Outlease term or after expiration or
termination thereof, Lessee shall be solely responsible for removal or remediation of the hazardous or toxic
condition in accordance with Environmental Laws. Notwithstanding any other clause in this Section or in the
Outlease, Lessee shall remove all of Lessee’s Hazardous Materials from the Premises at the expiration or
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
termination of the Outlease and provide copies of all permits, notices and manifests required for such removal to
Lessor. Lessee’s failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall be grounds for termination of this
Outlease for default. Receipt by Lessor of notices, reports, or any other information or documentation required
herein shall not impose any responsibility on Lessor to supervise the affairs of Lessee nor relieve Lessee of its
responsibility to comply fully with all applicable laws and regulations. The rights and remedies of Lessor provided
in this section are in addition to any other rights and remedies which may be available to Lessor by law or under
this Outlease. Lessee hereby indemnifies Lessor and its officers, agents, representatives, and employees from all
claims, loss, damage, actions, causes of action, expense and/or liability, including the cost of defense, resulting
from, brought for, or on account of any violation of this clause. This indemnity shall survive any termination or
expiration of the Outlease Term or any Renewal Term.
25. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM):
For the purposes of this Section 25, “Asbestos-Containing Material” (ACM) means any material containing more
than 1% asbestos as determined by using the method specified in 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix E.
“Friable asbestos material” means any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by
hand pressure.
The Premises may, or may not, contain ACM. It is Lessee's responsibility to review the Asbestos Survey a copy of
which Lessor has provided to Lessee. Lessee acknowledges receipt and review of the complete Asbestos Survey, as
evidenced by the cover page and summary of the pages (the entire Asbestos Survey is not included due to its
voluminous nature) in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. Lessee understands and agrees that the
Asbestos Survey is provided for informational purposes only. Should Lessee contract for custodial services or any
other services (including construction, repairs, etc.), Lessee shall notify its contractor of the existence of ACM, where
applicable, and provide its contractor with a copy of any Asbestos Survey. Neither Lessee nor its contractor or any
other party is entitled to rely on the accuracy of the Asbestos Survey.
In the event Lessee performs any alteration, repair or work within the Premises and Lessee subsequently discovers or
identifies ACM in the Premises, Lessee shall provide written notice to the USPS Contracting Officer within 48 hours
of discovery of the ACM. Lessee agrees at Lessee’s sole cost and expense to remove and/or abate any friable ACM
and to coordinate all work with Lessor. Lessee further agrees to provide Lessor copies of all documents, including
sampling, lab work, tests and test results tests related to the ACM and performance of the work.
Any renovation or alteration performed by Lessee impacting or potentially impacting ACM requires the prior written
approval of the USPS Contracting Officer and in the event of such approval Lessee shall coordinate all work with the
Lessor. In performance of any work that impacts or potentially impacts ACM, Lessee shall comply with all applicable
local, state, and federal laws, as well as all USPS requirements, including USPS asbestos policies, plans, management
instructions, and environmental policies (“Lessor Asbestos Requirements”). Lessee must keep complete records of all
such activity and transfer them to Lessor at the termination of the Outlease.
Lessee agrees to require its contractor to act only in accordance with Lessor Asbestos Requirements. Should Lessee
or any contractor providing services to or at the Premises have any questions or concerns regarding Lessor’s Asbestos
Requirements, Lessee shall contact Lessor prior to undertaking any action at the Premises.
Lessee hereby indemnifies, releases, and holds harmless Lessor from any and all claims, losses, etc. in any way arising
out of any work or activity performed related to this Section 25.
26. Compliance with Laws: Lessee shall, and shall ensure that its employees, agents, affiliates, representatives and
contractors, identify and fully comply with all laws, including, but not limited to, (i) federal, state, municipal and local
laws, codes and regulations, (ii) the rules, orders, regulations and requirements of governmental departments and
bureaus, and (iii) all codes, laws, ordinances and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction over the
Premises and pertaining to Lessee’s use, occupancy and condition of the Premises and all machinery, equipment and
furnishings therein (hereinafter “Laws”). Lessee shall use due care in the occupation and use of the Premises. If any
permits are required in order to allow Lessee to lawfully improve the Premises and to occupy and conduct its business
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
in the Premises, then Lessee shall obtain and keep current such permits at Lessee's expense and promptly deliver a
copy thereof to Lessor.
27. Holding Over: If Lessee occupies the Premises beyond the Outlease Term or any properly exercised Renewal Term,
without Lessor's written consent ("Hold Over"), Lessee shall be deemed to occupy the Premises on a month to month
basis, terminable by either party on thirty (30) days written notice to the other party and all of the terms and provisions
of this Outlease shall be applicable during that period, except that Lessee shall pay Lessor a monthly rental rate equal
to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the monthly rent applicable hereunder at the expiration of the previous Outlease
Term or applicable Renewal Term, prorated for the number of days of such holding over. If Lessee refuses to vacate
after receiving a notice of termination as provided in this section, Lessee shall be deemed a Lessee at sufferance and
Lessor may use self-help, or may institute a forcible detainer or similar action against Lessee or any other party in
possession of the Premises, or pursue any other remedy available at law or in equity.
28. Governing Law: This Outlease shall be governed, construed and interpreted by, through and under federal law. In the
event there is no applicable federal law, the laws of the State of California shall apply.
29. Final Agreement: This Outlease terminates and supersedes all prior understandings or agreements on the subject
matter hereof. This Agreement may be modified only by a further writing that is duly executed by both parties.
30. No Waiver: The failure of Lessor to insist in any one or more instance upon performance of any of the terms,
covenants, or conditions of this Outlease shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance
of any such term, covenant, or condition. Lessee’s obligation with respect to such future performance shall continue
in full force and effect.
31. Headings: The headings used in this Outlease are for convenience of the parties only and shall not be considered in
interpreting the meaning of any provision of this Outlease.
32. Successors: The provisions of this Outlease shall extend to and be binding upon Lessor and Lessee and their respective
legal representatives, successors and assigns.
33. Authority. Each party represents that it has caused this Outlease to be executed on its behalf as of the date written
below by a representative empowered to bind that party with respect to the undertakings and obligations contained
herein.
34. General Conditions: This Outlease is subject to the General Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit D.
35. Counterparts. This Outlease may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute a single instrument.
The parties agree that if the signature(s) of either Lessor or the Lessee on this Outlease or any amendments, addendums,
or other records associated with this Outlease is not an original but is a digitally encrypted signature, then such digitally
encrypted signature shall be as enforceable, valid and binding as, and the legal equivalent to, an authentic original wet
signature penned manually by its signatory.
Privacy Act Statement: Your information will be used to process your Outlease Agreement. Collection is authorized
by 39 USC 401. Providing the information is voluntary, but if not provided, we may not process your request. We may
only disclose your information as follows: in relevant legal proceedings; to law enforcement when the USPS or
requesting agency becomes aware of a violation of law; to a congressional office at your request; to entities or
individuals under contract with USPS; to entities authorized to perform audits; to labor organizations as required by law;
to federal, state, local or foreign government agencies regarding personnel matters; to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission; to the Merit Systems Protection Board or Office of Special Counsel; to the Department of the
Treasury under the Treasury Offset Program computer matching to establish an identity; and to financial institutions or
payees to facilitate or resolve issues with payment services. For more information regarding our privacy policies visit
usps.com/privacy policy.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
ADDENDUM
Additional clauses for properties with a USPS presence and/or other Lessees:
The remainder of the page is left intentionally blank.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
EXECUTED BY LESSEE this 6th day of December , 2022.
FEDERAL / STATE / LOCAL
GOVERNMENT ENTITY
By executing this Outlease, Lessee certifies that Lessee is not a USPS employee or contract employee (or an immediate
family member of either), or a business organization substantially owned or controlled by a USPS employee or contract
employee (or an immediate family member of either).
Name of Gov’t entity: Contra Costa County, a political division of the State of California
By: Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director
Signature
Lessee’s Address: 255 Glacier Drive
City: Martinez
State: CA
Zip + 4: 94553
Lessee’s Telephone Number(s): 925-313-2000 FAX: 925-646-0288
Federal Tax Identification No.: 94-6000-509
Witness Witness
d. Where the Lessee is a local, state, federal or governmental agency or entity (“Government Entity”), the Outlease must
be accompanied by documentary evidence affirming the authority of the signatory, officer, agent, or agents, to execute
the Outlease so to bind the Government Entity, for which he or she (or they) purports to act. The usual evidence
required to establish such authority is in the form of a Contracting Officer warrant, delegation of authority, or the
equivalent of a corporate seal or resolution duly attested by a corporate secretary/managing members/managing
partners. Such resolutions, when required, must contain the essential stipulations embodied in the Outlease. The
names and official titles of the signatories or officers who are authorized to sign the Outlease must appear in the
document.
Any notice to Lessee provided under this Outlease or under any law or regulation must be in writing and submitted to
Lessee at the address specified above, or at an address that Lessee has otherwise appropriately directed in writing. Any
notice to the Postal Service provided under this Outlease or under any law or regulation must be in writing and submitted
to “Contracting Officer, U.S. Postal Service” at the address specified below, or at an address that the Postal Service has
otherwise directed in writing.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
ACCEPTANCE BY THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Date:
Letitia Russell
Contracting Officer Signature of Contracting Officer
Address of Contracting Officer
PO Box 27497
Greensboro, NC 27498-1103
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Exhibit A
Room 1, adjacent space# 1 and #2, space #3, #4 on the first floor, and joint use of space #5 and #6 on the 2nd floor;
consisting of approximately 1,763 square feet for office use, and including a storage room located in the South East
(SE) section of the basement level and measuring approximately 180 additional square feet (9 x 20 feet) and a storage
room located in the North East (NE) section of the basement next to the boiler room at the bottom of the stairs and
measuring approximately 280 additional square feet (14 x 20 feet), for a total square footage of approximately 2,223
square feet, within the Martinez Court Street Station, 815 Court Street, Martinez, CA 94553-9991.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Exhibit B
Asbestos
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Exhibit B
Asbestos
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Exhibit C
Rules and Regulations
A. APPLICABILITY
These rules and regulations apply to all real property under the charge and control of the Postal Service, to all Lessees,
tenant agencies, and to all persons entering or on such property. These rules and regulations shall be posted and kept
posted at a conspicuous place on all such property.
B. RECORDING PRESENCE
Except as otherwise ordered, properties must be closed to the public after normal business hours. Properties also may be
closed to the public in emergency situations and at such times as may be necessary for the orderly conduct of business.
Admission to properties when such properties are closed to the public may be limited to authorized individuals who may
be required to sign the register and display identification documents when requested by security force personnel or other
authorized individuals.
C. GENERAL RESTRICTIONS
1. Preservation of Property. Improperly disposing of rubbish, spitting, creating any hazard to persons or things,
throwing articles of any kind from a building, climbing upon the roof or any part of a building, or willfully destroying,
damaging, or removing any property or any part thereof, is prohibited.
2. Conformity with Signs and Directions. All persons in and on the property shall comply with official signs of a
prohibitory or directory nature, and with the directions of security force personnel or other authorized individuals.
3. Inspection. Purses, briefcases, and other containers brought into, while on, or being removed from the property are
subject to inspection. However, items brought directly to a postal facility’s customer mailing acceptance area and
deposited in the mail are not subject to inspection, except as provided by section 274 of the Administrative Support
Manual. A person arrested for violation of this section may be searched incident to that arrest.
D. SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS
1. Disturbances. Disorderly conduct, or conduct which creates loud and unusual noise, or which obstructs the usual use
of entrances, foyers, corridors, offices, elevators, stairways, and parking lots, or which otherwise tends to impede or
disturb the public employees in the performance of their duties, or which otherwise impedes or disturbs the general
public in transacting business or obtaining the services provided on property, is prohibited.
2. Gambling. Participating in games for money or other personal property, the operating of gambling devices, the
conduct of a lottery or pool, or the selling or purchasing of lottery tickets, is prohibited on postal premises. This
prohibition does not apply to the vending or exchange of state lottery tickets at vending facilities operated by licensed
blind persons where such lotteries are authorized by state law.
3. Alcoholic Beverages and Drugs. A person under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug that has been
defined as a “controlled substance” may not enter postal property or operate a motor vehicle on postal property. The
possession, sale, or use of any “controlled substance” (except when permitted by law) or the sale or use of any
alcoholic beverage (except as authorized by the Postmaster General or designee) on postal premises is prohibited.
The term “controlled substance” is defined in section 802 of title 21 U.S.C.
4. Smoking and Sale of Tobacco Products in Vending Machines.
a. Smoking (defined as having a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, or other smoking material) is prohibited in all postal
buildings and office space, including public lobbies.
b. The sale of tobacco products in vending machines located in or around postal property is prohibited. The
distribution of free samples of tobacco products in or around postal property is also prohibited. The term “tobacco
product” means cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, pipe tobacco, smokeless tobacco, snuff, and chewing tobacco.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
5. Soliciting, Electioneering, Collecting Debts, Vending, and Advertising. Soliciting alms and contributions, campaigning
for election to any public office, collecting private debts, commercial soliciting and vending, (including but not limited
to, the vending of newspapers and other publications), the display or distribution of commercial advertising on postal
premises, soliciting signatures on petitions, polls, or surveys (except as otherwise authorized by Postal Service
regulations), and impeding ingress to or egress from post offices are prohibited. These prohibitions do not apply to:
a. Commercial or nonprofit activities performed under contract with the Postal Service or pursuant to the
provisions of the Randolph-Sheppard Act;
b. Posting notices on bulletin boards as authorized in POSTAL OPERATIONS MANUAL 221.525;
c. The solicitation of Postal Service and other federal military and civilian personnel for contributions by recognized
agencies as authorized by the Manual on Fund Raising Within the Federal Service issued under Executive Order
10927 of March 13, 1961.
6. Leafleting, picketing, etc. Leafleting, distributing literature, picketing, and demonstrating by members of the public
are prohibited in lobbies and other interior areas of postal buildings open to the public. Public assembly and public
address, except when conducted or sponsored by the Postal Service, are also prohibited in lobbies and other interior
areas of postal buildings open to the public
7. Voter registration. Voter registration may be conducted on postal premises only in full accordance with the
requirements of 39 CFR 232.1(h)(4).
8. Placement of furniture, etc. Except as part of postal activities or activities associated with those permitted under section
D.7 above, no tables, chairs, freestanding signs or posters, structures, or furniture of any type may be placed in postal
lobbies or on postal walkways, steps, plazas, lawns or landscaped areas, driveways, parking lots, or other exterior
spaces.
9. Depositing Literature. The depositing or posting of handbills, flyers, pamphlets, signs, posters, placards, or other
literature except official postal and other governmental notices and announcements on the grounds, walks, driveways,
parking and maneuvering area, exteriors of buildings and other structures, or on the floors, walls, stairs, racks, counters,
desks, writing tables, window ledges, or furnishings, in interior public areas on postal premises is prohibited. This
prohibition does not apply to:
a. Posting notices on bulletin boards as authorized in 221.525, POSTAL OPERATIONS MANUAL.
b. Interior space assigned to tenancies for their exclusive use.
10. Photographs for News, Advertising, or Commercial Purposes.
Except as prohibited by official signs or the directions of security force personnel or other authorized personnel or a
federal court order or rule, photographs for news purposes may be taken in entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or
auditoriums when used for public meeting. Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local
postmaster or installation head.
11. Dogs and Other Animals. Dogs and other animals, except those used to assist persons with disabilities, must not be
brought upon postal property for other than official purposes.
12. Vehicular and Pedestrian Traffic
a. Drivers of all vehicles in or on postal premises shall drive in a careful and safe manner at all times and shall comply
with signals and directions of security force personnel, other authorized individuals, and all posted traffic signs.
b. The blocking of entrances, driveways, walks, loading platforms, or fire hydrants is prohibited.
c. Parking without authority, parking in unauthorized locations or in locations reserved for other persons, or
continuously in excess of 18 hours without permission, or contrary to the direction of posted signs is prohibited.
The section may be supplemented by the postmaster or installation head from time to time by the issuance and
posting of specific traffic directives as may be required. When so issued and posted, such directives shall have the
same force and effect as if made a part thereof.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
13. Weapons and Explosives. No person while on postal property shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons,
or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.
E. NONDISCRIMINATION
There must be no discrimination by segregation or otherwise against any person or persons because of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, age (persons 40 years of age or older are protected), reprisal (discrimination against a
person for having filed or for having participated in the processing of an EEO complaint_29 CFR 1613.261-262), or
physical or mental handicap, in furnishing, or by refusing to furnish to such person or persons the use of any facility
of a public nature, including all services, privileges, accommodations, and activities provided on postal property.
F. PENALTIES AND OTHER LAW
1. Alleged violations of these rules and regulations are heard and the penalties prescribed herein are imposed, either in a
Federal District Court or by a federal magistrate in accordance with applicable court rules. Questions regarding such
rules should be directed to the regional counsel for the region involved.
2. To the extent applicable under 39 CFR Part 232, whoever shall be found guilty of violating the rules and regulations
in this notice while on property under the charge and control of the Postal Service is subject to fine of not more than
$50 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days or both. Nothing contained in these rules and regulations shall be
construed to abrogate any other federal laws or regulations or any state or local laws and regulations applicable to any
area in which the property is situated.
3. Members of the U.S. Postal Security Force shall exercise the powers of special policemen provided by 40 U.S.C. 318
and shall be responsible for enforcing the regulations in this notice in a manner that will protect Postal Service property.
Postal inspectors, Office of Inspector General Criminal Investigators, and other persons designated by the chief Postal
Inspector may likewise enforce regulations in this notice.
Outlease Agreement
RMH 6.7.19
Exhibit D
General Conditions
1. Contingent Fees/Brokers
a. The Lessee warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or obtain this
Outlease for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, except bona fide employees or bona fide,
established commercial or selling agencies employed by the Lessee for the purpose of obtaining business.
b. For licensed employees or established commercial brokerage agencies employed by the parties for the purpose of
leasing space for a brokerage commission, each party agrees to pay its respective agent a commission in
accordance with the respective agreement(s) between the respective party and its agent/broker.
c. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Postal Service has the right to annul this contract without liability or
to deduct from the contract price or otherwise recover the full amount of the commission, percentage, brokerage
fee, or contingent fee.
2. Non-Discrimination: The Lessee agrees that they will not discriminate by segregation or otherwise against any person
or persons because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age (persons 40 years of age or older are protected),
reprisal (discrimination against a person for having filed or for having participated in the processing of an EEO
complaint 29 CFR 1613.261-262), or physical or mental handicap, in furnishing, or by refusing to furnish to such
person or persons the use of any facility of a public nature, including all services, privileges, accommodations, and
activities provided herein.
3. Relocation: Lessee acknowledges that it acquires no right by virtue of execution of this Outlease to claim any benefits
under Title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 777 (Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies).
4. Gratuities or Gifts (Clause 1-5: March 2006)
a. The Postal Service may terminate this contract for default if, after notice and a hearing, the Postal Service Board
of Contract Appeals determines that the Lessee or the Lessee’s agent or other representative:
i. Offered or gave a gratuity or gift (as defined in 5 CFR 2635) to an officer or employee of the Postal Service; and
ii. Intended by the gratuity or gift to obtain a contract or favorable treatment under a contract.
b. The rights and remedies of the Postal Service provided in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies
provided by law or under this contract.
5. Incorporation by Reference: In addition to the foregoing, the following clauses are incorporated in this contract by
reference. The text of incorporated terms may be found in the Contract Clauses section of the Postal Service’s
Supplying Principles and Practices manual, which is accessible on-line or upon request.
Clause 9-7, Equal Opportunity (March 2006)1
Clause 9-13, Affirmative Action for Handicapped Workers (March 2006)2
Clause 9-14, Affirmative Action for Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible
Veterans (February 2010)3
1For contracts aggregating payments of $10,000 or more.
2For contracts aggregating payments of $10,000 or more.
3For contracts aggregating payments of $25,000 or more.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Director, or designee, to accept and execute any necessary documents associated with the
California for All Animals Program Grant from The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of its Davis Campus School of
Veterinary Medicine in an amount not to exceed $200,000, to update the department's strategic plan, community engagement program, and
marketing program, for the period of September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County match. 100% State funds
BACKGROUND:
The California for All Animals program was originally proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2020 to help meet the state’s goal that no
healthy or treatable animal be euthanized in a California shelter. It was funded by the legislature in 2021. The goal is to develop local programs
that provide every at-risk animal the "Right Care in the Right Place at the Right Time to the Right Outcome." The Department of Animal
Services seeks to utilize grant funds to explore ways to strengthen the department's foundation to bolster programs and develop an improved
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Arturo Castillo: 925-608-8408
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.20
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:California for All Animals Program Grant
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
understanding of the needs of the community. The grant scope has three areas of focus:
1) Strategic Plan- The Animal Services Department will identify a contractor to assess the successes and challenges of the current 2018
strategic plan, and to work with staff to develop and design an updated strategic plan.
2) Community Engagement Program - The Department will engage County residents and partners to educate them about available services,
and to asses animal welfare needs and priorities through a series of community engagement activities to inform the development of a
current community engagement plan.
3) Marketing Program - The Department will develop a marketing plan and various media tools to better engage underserved populations.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Animal Services Department will not receive the additional funds to update its strategic plan, community
engagement program, and marketing program.
ATTACHMENTS
UC Davis Agreement
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment Agreement #29-814-6
with the City of Concord, to amend Grant Agreement #29-814, as amended by Amendment Agreements #29-814-1 through #29-814-5,
effective July 1, 2022, to increase the amount payable to the county by $400,000, from $666,218 to a new amount of $1,066,218 and to extend
the termination date from June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2023 for the continuation of Coordinated Outreach, Referral and Engagement (CORE)
services to residents in Concord.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this amendment agreement will allow the county to receive an additional amount not to exceed $400,000 from the City of Concord.
No County match required.
BACKGROUND:
The CORE Program services locate and engage homeless clients throughout Contra Costa County. CORE teams serve as an entry point into the
county’s coordinated entry system for unsheltered persons and work to locate, engage, stabilize and house chronically homeless individuals and
families.
On September 12, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #29-814, to receive funds from the City of Concord in an amount of
$61,230 for the provision of the CORE Program, for the period from August 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This agreement included agreeing
to indemnify and hold harmless the contractor for claims arising out of county’s performance under this contract.
On February 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-814-1 to increase the amount payable to the county by
$67,284 to a new amount of $128,514 and extend the termination date from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019.
On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-814-2 to increase the amount payable to the county by
$75,472 to a new amount of $203,986 and extend the termination date from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Christy Saxton, 925-608-6700
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C.21
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Amendment Agreement #29-814-6 with the City of Concord
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
On July 28, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-814-3 to increase the amount payable to the county by
$81,381 to a new amount of $285,367 and extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021.
On March 2, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-814-4 to increase the amount payable to the county by
$319,851 to a new amount not to exceed $605,218 and extend the termination date from June 30, 2021 to June 30, 2022.
On January 11, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-814-5, effective January 1, 2022, to increase the
amount payable to the county by $61,000 to a new amount of $666,218 to continue providing homeless outreach services to Concord
through June 30, 2022.
Approval of Amendment Agreement #29-814-6 will allow county to continue to receive funds for homeless outreach services through June
30, 2023. This action is retroactive due to county not receiving the amendment agreement from the City of Concord until October 27, 2022.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this amendment is not approved, county will not receive additional funding and without such funding, the CORE program may have to
operate at a reduced capacity.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/414 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff or Commander Management Services to apply for and accept
State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) funds in an initial amount of $1,200,000 from the California Governor’s Office of
Emergency Services to assist in preventing and responding to terrorist attacks for the period of September 1, 2022, through the end of the grant
fund availability and to authorize specified Sheriff’s officials to act on behalf of the County to obtain this funding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$1,200,000, 100% Federal. No County match.
BACKGROUND:
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.22
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:State Homeland Security Grant Program FY 2022
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) is a Federal Department of Homeland Security
(DHS)/Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA’s) grant program. This grant is distributed to the Contra Costa Operational Area
to assist in preventing, protecting and responding to and recovering from terrorist attacks. These grant programs are part of a comprehensive
set of measures authorized by Congress and implemented by DHS to help strengthen the nation’s communities against potential terrorist
attacks.
The funding will allow for enhanced cybersecurity, protection of soft targets/crowded places, enhancement of information and intelligence
sharing and cooperation with federal agencies, including DHS, combating domestic violent extremism, addressing emergent threats (e.g.
transnational criminal organizations, unmanned aircraft systems (UASs)).
The initial total grant program allocation provided to the County by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and as a pass-through the
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) is $1,200,000.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Office of the Sheriff would not be able to apply for and accept this grant funding.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2022/414
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2022/414
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 12/06/2022 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2022/414
IN THE MATTER OF: Applying for and Accepting 2022 State Homeland Security Grant Program funds.
WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa is seeking funds available through the State Homeland Security Grant Program
administered by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: Authorizes the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff or
Commander Management Services, to execute for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa, a public entity established under
the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining Federal financial assistance including grant
modification and extensions provided by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and sub-granted through the State of
California related to the State Homeland Security Grant Program.
Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept Grant Award #78-016 from the Department of Health and
Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), to pay the County an amount up to $1,016,548, for
the Mobile Crisis Response Team Expansion Project, for the period from September 30, 2022 through September 29, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Acceptance of the grant award will result in payment to the County of up to $1,016,548 from SAMHSA. No County match is required.
BACKGROUND:
This award from SAMHSA will be utilized for the Mobile Crisis Response Team Expansion Project under The Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime
(A3) Program. Staff will be hired in phases correlated to countywide community needs. This grant helps fund current staff and initial hiring as
the program expands to countywide services. The estimated cost for staffing in the first year is $1,061,548, equivalent to the funding provided
by this grant. The A3 Program will interface with Contra Costa’s Behavioral Health Services, Contra Costa Health Services, Contra Costa
Medical Regional Center (CCRMC), Psychiatric Emergency Services, law enforcement, fire partners, and other first responders, as well as
detention facilities and dispatch systems across the County. A3 will partner with external agencies to help triage patients and as a filler for
temporary immediate response of behavioral health crisis services.
The A3 Program is a countywide behavioral health crisis response service needed to deescalate behavioral health issues, administer immediate
behavioral health services, and refer to additional County resources for ongoing treatment. The A3 Program will alleviate the impact of 911 calls
directed to law enforcement for behavioral health issues and help redirect calls to the program for immediate assistance and response. In
addition, this program is anticipated to decrease the Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) occupancy by providing responsive and timely
behavioral health services while reducing service gaps. There is currently no timely, culturally, and clinically appropriate response. The A3
Program has applied for multiple grants to cover initial staffing costs and technological start-up
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5212
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm
C.23
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Grant Award #78-016 with the Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
fees.
The grant award letter was received by the Department in early October 2022. Processing was delayed due to Behavioral Health Staff
responding to additional requests for information from the awarding agency. Further delays resulted from staff member’s unfamiliarity with
receiving an award letter rather than a formal agreement and unaware that the awarded funds required the Board of Supervisor’s approval.
Approval of Grant Award #78-016 will allow county to receive funds for the Mobile Crisis Response Team Expansion Project through
September 29, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this grant award is not approved, the County will not receive up to $1,016,548 to suppor the staffing of the Mobile Crisis Response Team
Expansion Project.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept Grant Award #78-110 from the Department of Health and
Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), to pay county an amount up to $1,000,000, for the Community
Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending - Construction, for the period from August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Acceptance of the grant award will result in payment to the County of up to $1,000,000 for a three year period from HRSA. No County match is
required.
BACKGROUND:
This grant will help fund renovations for the Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime (A3) Program Wellness Campus located at 1034 Oak Grove in
Concord. The A3 project is a new service to support behavioral health crisis support in the community. Some responses from teams may result in
referrals to existing behavioral health services and in some cases law enforcement. The A3 program is a comprehensive behavioral health crisis
response program born from community tragedy and the common occurrence of individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis being
inappropriately served by law enforcement or emergency medical response when behavioral health interventions may be more appropriate. The
goals of A3 are to have a place to call, someone to respond, and a place to go to. The renovation of the Oak Grove Hub will house the Miles Hall
Call Center which will accept crisis calls, and house County mobile response personnel, a peer respite center, and urgent care services for clients
whose symptoms may not rise to the level of Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) or other County services. The Oak Grove Hub adds critical
components to the system of care to meet the goals identified in the community planning process.
This grant award is being processed late due to an oversight by the Department’s Behavioral Health staff. The grant award letter was received by
staff in late August 2022, however, staff was unfamiliar with receiving only an award letter rather than a formal agreement and did not realize it
needed Board of Supervisor’s approval.
Grant
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5212
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm
C.24
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Grant Award #78-110 with the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Award #78-110 will allow Contra Costa County’s Health Services Department to provide additional funding for renovations for the A3
Wellness campus through July 31, 2025.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this grant award is not approved, the County will not receive up to $1,000,000 to renovate the A3 Wellness campus for behavioral health
crisis support in the community.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/492 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract
with the California Department of Community Services and Development to accept funding in an amount not to exceed $3,367,278 for the Low
Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) for the period November 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
County to receive funds in the amount of $3,367,278 is 100% federally funded with federal dollars pass through California Department of
Community Services and Development, all of which has been budgeted in FY 2023-2024. No County match is required.
CFDA /AL# 93.568
State Agreement Number: 23B-5005
Count Contract Number: 39-806-47
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: L. Pacheco 608-4963
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.25
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:California Department of Community Services and Development, Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
BACKGROUND:
The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) received notification from the State Department of Community Services and
Development (CSD) on October 12, 2022, to execute the 2022 Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) agreement
23B-5005.
The County routinely receives funding from CSD wherein Contra Costa County provides energy bill assistance payments and/or
Weatherization services to residents who are income eligible through LIHEAP and the Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP). The
program offers energy saving measures to low-income County residents which may include, but not limited to, hot water heaters, furnaces,
refrigerators, microwaves, doors, windows, energy-saving light bulbs, weather stripping, ceilings fans, and attic insulation. Homes with gas
appliances receive a combustion appliance safety test that checks or carbon monoxide gas leakage and are provided with a carbon monoxide
alarm. In addition, residents may also qualify for the Utility Assistance Program, which provides a credit on their energy bills. First priority
for services are to those households with the lowest income and highest energy burden. LIHEAP priority is to service those households with
the following vulnerable populations: young children (ages five years or under), disabled, and elderly persons (ages 60 years or older).
The program is operated by the EHSD, Community Services Bureau (CSB).
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If not approved, the County may not provide services to eligible residents for LIHEAP in Contra Costa County to meet their energy needs.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
The LIHEAP funding supports one of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card, #4 "Families that are Safe, Stable
and Nurturing" by the provision of home energy assistance to keep households warm in winter and to increase household energy efficiency.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2020/307
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2022/307
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 12/08/2020 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2020/307
In The Matter Of: California Department of Community Services and Development, Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Program (LIHEAP)
WHEREAS, County Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD)routinely receives funding from California
Department of Community Services and Development (CDCSD), and WHEREAS, CDCSD will provide funding in an amount
not to exceed $342,935 (Agreement No.21B-5005) for the period November 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022 to EHSD for the
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), and WHEREAS, EHSD provides energy saving measures to
low-income County residents which may include, but not limited to hot water heaters, furnaces, refrigerators, microwaves, doors
and windows,light bulbs, weather stripping, ceiling fans, attic insulation, carbon monoxide alarms, and energy bill credit, and
WHEREAS, the LIHEAP goal is to increase household energy efficiency.
Now, Ttherefore, Be It Resolved: the Contra Costa County Board of Suppervisors approve and authroize the Employment and
Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with California Department of Community Services and Develoment
in the amount of $3,342,935 for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program or the period November 1 2020 through
June 30, 2022.
Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 8, 2020
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Leica Microsystems, Inc., in an amount not
to exceed $596,174 for the purchase of tissue sample equipment and reagent supplies for the Clinical Laboratory at the Contra Costa Regional
Medical Center (CCRMC), for the period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $596,174 during the period September 1, 2022 through August 30, 2027, and will be
funded 100% by the Hospital Enterprise Fund I.
BACKGROUND:
Leica Cassette Printer is used to label cassettes carrying patient tissue samples with accession number and patient names. The print is crisp,
clear, and easy to read, thus minimizing specimen misidentification due to manual labeling. Leica IPC Printer is compatible with current
instruments still in use such as the Clinical Laboratory’s Tissue Processor, Automatic Stainer, IHC Bond Max, and Slide Coverslipper. Leica is
a reputable company and is considered a quality name in every aspect of Clinical and Pathology Laboratory equipment. Leica Microsystems has
its own crew of service people in the Bay Area to service their own products and equipment, and so any repairs are immediate which results in
minimizing delays for patient results and care. The $596,174 includes the minimum required purchase amount listed in the acquisition
agreement with the vendor along with an additional amount to cover any increased workflow.
The cost of the equipment is paid through the payment for reagent supplies. The department must purchase a minimum amount of reagent
supplies on a monthly basis. The County may only terminate the agreement for Leica’s uncured breach, or if the board fails to appropriate funds
due under the agreement in any fiscal year. The County is obligated to indemnify Leica for any liability arising out of protected health
information that remains in equipment returned to Leica upon expiration or termination of the agreement.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sam Ferrell, (925) 357-7483
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.26
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract with Leica Microsystems, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to (1) execute a letter of termination with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
to terminate Quality Controls Purchase Agreement dated June 28, 2022.
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a blanket purchase order
with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, and related letters of participation, for the purchase of reagents and
supplies for the Clinical Laboratory Department at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) for the period of July 1, 2022 to June
30, 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of these actions will result in expenditures of up to $1,500,000 over the five-year period between July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2027
and will be funded 100% by the Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues.
BACKGROUND:
Since 2010, the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) Clinical Laboratory has utilized Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., reagents, along
with various controls, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) media, hemoglobin A1C for diabetes, and other supplies in the lab's
chemistry, urinalysis, and microbiology sections. These sections of the lab utilize these reagents and supplies to perform routine testing on
patient samples daily. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. provides high-performance products and has a proven track record for quality and innovation
for over 70 years. Bio Rad Laboratories, Inc. supplies have aided us in streamlining our workflow by reducing our reagent waste, increasing our
productivity, and helping to optimize our costs while providing quality diagnostic results. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. provides the lab confidence
in their products simultaneously providing our lab professionals the materials they need to attain accurate patient results facilitating in excellent
patient care. The equipment that the laboratory currently has is supplied by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and are sole proprietary for the analyzer
used by CCRMC for diagnostic testing. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. is an awarded suppler for third-party laboratory controls on the Vizient
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sam Ferrell, (925) 357-7483
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.27
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Purchase Order with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) contract portfolio.
CCRMC Clinical Laboratory has been reviewing the Bio-Rad Vizient contract in order for the laboratory to obtain best pricing based on
their market share for the purchase of consumables for CCRMC and the Contra Costa Health Centers. Due to an administrative error,
Laboratory staff signed an agreement directly with Bio-Rad providing for five year fixed pricing and penalties for not meeting their market
share commitment. Bio-Rad has since agreed to terminate this agreement and approved Tier 3 pricing on the Vizient contract, which
provides three (3) year fixed pricing at a discounted rate in exchange for a 90% market share commitment. Bio-Rad is the sole provider for
thirty party controls at CCRMC, however, in the event CCRMC does not meet their market share commitment, Bio-Rad will re-slot
CCRMC to the appropriate tier for future purchases. Unlike the agreement signed by the Lab, the approval of the LOP eliminates all
financial obligation to Bio-Rad for past purchases. In the meantime, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. has invoiced consumables for CCRMC
Clinical Laboratory for the period of July 1, 2022 to present.
On July 11, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved item C.141 to execute a blanket purchase order with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in the
an amount not to exceed $370,000 for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2022 to purchase reagents and supplies for the D-100
Hemoglobin Testing System at CCRMC.
On February 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved item C.107 to execute an amendment to purchase order 09142 with Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $100,000 for a new payment limit of $470,000 for the period July 1, 2017 through June
30, 2022.
On July 14, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.91 to execute an amendment to purchase order 09142 with Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $450,000 to a new payment limit of $920,000 and agenda item C.90 to execute a
purchase order with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. in the amount of $400,000 for the period of July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022 for reagents
and supplies for the Clinical Laboratory at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers.
On June 28, 2022, and Laboratory staff member signed a Quality Controls Purchase Agreement letter with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
without having gone through the appropriate County procedures required by California Government Code and Board of Supervisors
authority. The Department is therefore requesting that the Quality Controls Purchase Agreement be terminated, as agreed upon by both
parties. CCRMC staff have been reminded of County procurement and contracting County policies to prevent this from happening in the
future.
Approval of the requested purchase order will allow the Clinical Laboratory at CCRMC to continue to purchase reagents and supplies from
this vendor with one purchase order through June 30, 2027.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If these actions are not approved, the CCRMC Clinical Laboratory will be committed to a five year agreement with Bio-Rad, in which they
will need to reimburse Bio-Rad in the event they did not achieve their market share commitment. The Clinical Laboratory will not have a
purchase order available to meet their financial obligation to procure the third-party controls. Approval of this Board Order will allow for
the termination of this contract, approve the Vizient Tier 4 LOP, and provide funding to support the testing requirements for the hospital.
Without third party controls, CCRMC will experience a significant negative impact on patient care and diabetes monitoring especially in the
Emergency Room, where timely results are utmost needed. Physicians will experience delayed turnaround time for test results, thus
impacting their ability to diagnose and treat their patients. Further, the lab would need to send patient samples out to reference laboratories,
which will result in an increase in the cost per test and additional courier fees.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Environmental
Science Associates, Inc. (ESA), to extend the term from December 31, 2022 through December 31, 2023, and revise Attachment B -
Environmental Science Associates & Subsidiaries 2022 Schedule of Fees with no change to the payment limit of $402,588, to complete the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for the Keller Canyon Landfill permit amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund. The cost for preparing the CEQA review is charged to the project applicant (100% permit fees).
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) is the lead agency responsible for conducting the environmental review of the
proposed Keller Canyon Landfill (KCL) permit amendment. DCD retained ESA to prepare the environmental review document for the proposed
permit amendment. The existing contract will expire on December 31, 2022, however it is not possible for the work to be completed within the
existing time frame due to: (1) the Applicant's request that work on the environmental review be placed on hold pending completion of the
previous land use permit review process (completed in June 2022), (2) potential changes to the scope of the project being considered by the
landfill operator which, if formally proposed, may not require preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and (3)
preparation of revised studies to assess potential impacts to certain environmental resources. ESA is best suited to complete the environmental
review for this project due to the historical background and therefore, DCD is requesting authorization to amend the contract with ESA.
No further changes are proposed to the be made to the existing modified indemnification provision of the General Conditions (paragraph 18)
applicable to this contract. The contractor will continue to be required to indemnify the County.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without Board approval, DCD will be unable to complete the CEQA review for the KCL permit amendment that has been partially prepared by
ESA. The permit amendment process would be delayed in order for DCD staff to prepare a new proposal to enlist a consultant to finish the
CEQA review process.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: David Brockbank, 925-655-2911
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C.28
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract Amendment with Environmental Science Associates, Inc. for Environmental Review Work on the Keller Canyon
Landfill Permit Amendment
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27-826-6 with Diablo
Valley Perinatal Associates, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $700,000, to provide high-risk obstetrics (OB) perinatology services
for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $700,000 over a 2-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise
Fund II revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health
Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor is part of the CCHP Provider Network and has been providing perinatology
(high-risk OB) medical services for CCHP Members since January 2011.
On January 5, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-826-5 with Diablo Valley Perinatal Associates, Inc., in the amount not to
exceed $1,000,000, for the provision of high-risk OB perinatology services for CCHP members and County recipients for the period January 1,
2021 through December 31, 2022.
Approval of Contract #27-826-6 will allow the contractor to continue providing perinatology medical specialty services through December 31,
2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized high-risk perinatology health care services for CCHP members under the terms of their
Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sharron A. Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm
C.29
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #27-826-6 with Diablo Valley Perinatal Associates, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Robinson Mills + Williams,
effective November 29, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $1,000,000 to a new payment limit of $2,500,000 to continue providing
as-needed architectural services for various County projects with no change to the term, Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Various Funds as determined when projects are approved.
BACKGROUND:
On October 23, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved an as-needed Consulting Services Agreement with Robinson Mills + Williams, in the
amount of $750,000.
On September 21, 2021, the Board approved Amendment No. 1 to increase the payment limit from $750,000 to $1,500,000 and extended the
term from October 23, 2021, to October 23, 2022.
On September 13, 2022, the Board approved Amendment No. 2 to extend the term through October 23, 2023, with no change to the payment
limit.
Robinson Mills + Williams is familiar with these active projects, and the design and construction of typical building types. Therefore, it is
recommended that the contract amendment be awarded at this time.
Robinson Mills + Williams will continue to provide architectural services, such as programming, design and construction administration. The
type, size and location of projects will vary. Typical projects may include new construction, building renovations/modernizations, remodeling of
an entire building or specific areas within a building, tenant improvements, exterior building restorations, Mechanical-Electrical-Plumbing
upgrades, structural improvements, code-related improvements and deferred maintenance projects. Projects may also include studies to support
projects with potential BHCIP funding. Extending this
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jeffrey K Acuff, 925-957-2487
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.30
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Approve and Authorize Amendment No. 3 to Consulting Services Agreement with Robinson Mills + Williams to provide
as-needed Architectural Services
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
as-needed agreement will save the County time and money when compared to the time and expense in conducting a consultant selection process
on a project-by-project basis, and will allow the design phase to commence sooner and provide for a shorter project completion schedule.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If amendment No. 3 is not approved, projects currently in process will be delayed, which will ultimately result in higher project costs and may
impede the County’s ability to secure BHCIP grant funding.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, on behalf of the Probation Department, to purchase 140 Target gift cards in
the following amounts; one hundred (100) $20 gift cards and forty (40) $50 gift cards for a total of $4,000, to provide support to foster parents
prior to the Resource Family Approval process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% County General Fund, $4,000.
BACKGROUND:
In 2017, the Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) was implemented in California, and under CCR, the Resource Family Approval (RFA) Program
created a new family-friendly and child-centered caregiver approval process for both Child Welfare and Probation agencies. The Contra Costa
County Probation Department is expanding the internal process for RFA, in hopes of creating more opportunities for less restrictive placement
options for youths on probation, who have been largely under-represented in the home-based placement population. Resource Family
recruitment is a large piece of this developmental process, and it begins with awareness.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Chris De Dios, 925-313-4120
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.31
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Gift cards for Foster Parent Recruitment, Retention, and Support program
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Prior to the Resource Family Approval (RFA) process, families housing youths are asked to support foster children without any financial
support. Probation needs to support foster parents, resource families, and relative caregivers as they care for Probation youths. The purchase of
gift cards will enable the Department in providing that support.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If unapproved, the Probation Department will not be able to support and retain foster parents for Probation youths.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Human Resources Director, or designee, to extend the contract term with Worxtime, LLC through December
31, 2023, and increase the contract payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment limit of $375,000 to file required IRS reports and mail health
insurance coverage statements to County employees.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of this contract is 100% funded through the Benefits Administration Fee, which is a fee charged out to all departments whose
employees receive benefits through Human Resources.
BACKGROUND:
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that the County file information returns with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and provide
statements to employees about the health insurance coverage offered by Contra Costa County. Worxtime, LLC will assist the Human Resources
Department to comply with the ACA requirement by providing a cloud-hosted software solution. The system will enable the County to provide
required data to Worxtime electronically. Worxtime will file the IRS required reports and mail the required statements to County employees. The
contract obligates the County to indemnify Worxtime for losses arising out of the County’s breach of the agreement. The term extension and
payment limit increase will allow the Human Resources Department to continue to use the Worxtime software solution.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Salma Sadiq, (925) 655-2176
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.32
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Ann Elliott, Human Resources Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract extension with Worxtime, LLC., for Affordable Care Act compliance software and services for IRS required reporting
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the contract extension is not approved, the County will be unable to file timely and accurate returns to the IRS and furnish statements to
employees as required by law and as a result, may incur significant fines imposed by the federal government.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the County Librarian, a purchase order with Baker & Taylor in an
amount not to exceed $360,249 for book rental for the Contra Costa County Library, for the period January 1 through December 31, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Library Fund.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa County Library builds and maintains collections for the County’s residents. In order to meet the high demand of current materials,
the library is sometimes forced to purchase additional copies to supplement the long demand list. When popularity wanes, the library is faced
with the challenge and expense of storing the excess titles. The Baker & Taylor book rental program provides libraries with an efficient and
economical method for maintaining an inventory of the most current, high demand, hardcover titles. Renting library materials will allow the
library access to additional copies of popular titles for overall patron satisfaction without a negative storage impact. The rented materials will
have the same level of processing and branding that library patrons have learned to recognize as Contra Costa County Library materials.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Purchase Order is not approved, the Contra Costa County Library will not efficiently and economically meet the high patron demand of
current materials.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Walt Beveridge 925-608-7730
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.33
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Alison McKee, County Librarian
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Baker & Taylor Purchase Order for Book Rentals
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #74-438-19 with Vasanta
Venkat Giri, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $263,578, to provide telepsychiatry services to children and adolescents in Central
County, for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $263,578 and will be funded by 50% Federal Medi-Cal ($131,789) and
50% Mental Health Realignment ($131,789) revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
The County has been contracting with Vasanta Venkat Giri, M.D., since February 2012 to provide telepsychiatry services, including diagnosing,
counseling, evaluating and medical and therapeutic treatment to children and adolescents in Central Contra Costa County.
On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-438-16, with Vasanta Venkat Giri, M.D., in an amount not to exceed
$376,320, for the provision of telepsychiatry services to children in Central County for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022.
On June 21, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to Contract #74-438-18, with Vasanta Venkat Giri, M.D., effective June 1,
2022, to increase the payment limit by $25,000 to a new payment limit of $401,320, and increase the hourly rate from $192.00 to $211.20, for
the provision of additional telepsychiatry services to children in Central County with no change in the original term through December 31, 2022.
Approval of Contract #74-438-19 will allow the contractor to continue providing telepsychiatry services through December 31, 2023.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D.,
925-957-5169
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date
shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm
C.34
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #74-438-19 with Vasanta Venkat Giri, M.D.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, the County’s clients will not have access to this contractor’s telepsychiatry services and the Behavioral Health
Division outpatient clinics will not be fully staffed
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School”; “Families
that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected
program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional
Assessment Scale (CAFAS).
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-519 with West Coast
Kidney Institute, a general partnership, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to provide nephrology services for Contra Costa Health Plan
(CCHP) members and County recipients for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in annual expenditures of up to $2,000,000 and will be funded as budgeted by the department by 100%
CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues.
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized nephrology health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and
Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. Nephrology is a specialty of adult internal medicine and pediatric medicine that
concerns the study of the kidneys. This is a new contractor request to become part of the CCHP Provider Network and who will provide
nephrology services for kidney care.
Under new Contract #77-519, this contractor will provide nephrology services for CCHP members and County recipients for the period January
1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized nephrology health care services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and
Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided and the patients in need immediate attention related to kidney
health may suffer.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sharron A. Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm
C.35
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #77-519 with West Coast Kidney Institute
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Master Software Subscription Agreement with edu Business
Solutions, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $74,485 for Print Shop Pro installation, maintenance and training for the period December 6, 2022
through December 5, 2027, Countywide. (Project No. Various) (All Districts)
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% General Fund
BACKGROUND:
The company edu Business Solutions, Inc. (“edu”) provides the following services with Print Shop Pro: a subscription based software system to
manage the entire print shop operation including workflow, quoting, job status, inventory tracking and billing; a subscription based web-to-print
software system that provides online ordering, instant quoting and real time job status and automatically populates Print Shop Pro with
web-entered data; a subscription based module that: allows County to populate business cards, letterhead and envelopes online; that converts
various files types (Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, etc.) to print ready PDFs; that automatically authenticates users against the
organization's network directory with either CAS, ADFS
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Dale Morseman, 925-655-4501
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.36
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a Master Software Subscription Agreement with edu Business Solutions, Inc., a California
Corporation, Countywide
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
or SAML for open source single sign on across or within organizational boundaries; automatically validates account numbers against the
organization's accounting system during order process; and, that provides ability to use a barcode scanning device to move prints jobs
through the in-production workflow process. The contract would provide installation, maintenance, and training services. This software
would replace the current and expiring contract that the Print & Mail division of Public Works uses for these services and meets the needs
of Print & Mail.
This agreement includes modified insurance language, which was approved by Risk Management. The agreement for these services
contains an indemnification provision, whereby the County agrees to indemnify claims made by any third party against the contractor. The
agreement obligates edu to carry $500,000 in cyber-liability insurance.
Approval of this agreement will allow edu to provide Print Shop Pro installation, maintenance and training for the period December 6, 2022
through December 5, 2027.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without the approval of the Board of Supervisors, Print & Mail would not be able to efficiently provide Countywide services.
ATTACHMENTS
Master Software Subscription Agreement
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, on behalf of the Health Services Director, to execute a purchase order with
Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc. (CAPS) in an amount not to exceed $260,000 for the compounding of Total Parenteral Nutrition
(TPN) and Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN) Intravenous (IV) Solutions for patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health
Centers for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this purchase order will result in expenditures of up to $260,000 for compounded medications and will be fully funded as budgeted
in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Inpatient Pharmacy has been using Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc. (CAPS) for IV solutions
since May 2005. CAPS is a local company that can provide needed pharmaceutical products to our patients at CCRMC on a daily basis. Total
Parenteral Nutrition (TPN), Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN) and various IV solutions are purchased from CAPS. These critical
medications provide nutrients for patients who do not have a functioning GI tract or who have disorders requiring complete bowel rest.
On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.69 to execute purchase order (#24073) with Central Admixture
Pharmacy, Inc. in the amount of $260,000 for the period of December 1, 2021 through November 30, 2022.
Approval of the requested purchase order will allow this vendor to continue providing TPN, PPN and various IV solutions compounds for
CCRMC through November 30, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this purchase order is not approved, the lack of products such as TPN, PPN and various IV solution compounds, needed for treating our
patients will be unavailable, causing a negative impact in the health of our patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC).
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Irene M. Segovia, 925-335-7474
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.37
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Purchase Order with Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with
Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. (dba Curascript Specialty Distribution) in an amount not to exceed $500,000, for the contraceptive implant
Nexplanon to be used at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Centers for the period from December 1,
2022 through November 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this purchase order will result in expenditures of up to $500,000 and will be 100% funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Inpatient Pharmacy has purchased pharmaceuticals from Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. dba
Curascript Specialty Distribution since 2015. Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. provides Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health
Centers, and Detention Centers with contraceptive implant Nexplanon to be used in the Obstetrics/Gynecology Departments. Curascript
Specialty Distribution is a sole source provider for Nexplanon.
On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.71 to execute purchase order (#23960) with Priority Healthcare
Distribution, Inc. (dba Curascript Specialty Distribution) in the amount of $500,000 for the period from December 1, 2021 through November
30, 2022.
Approval of this request will allow the Department to continue to procure Nexplanon from this vendor through November 30, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this purchase order is not approved, the Department will not be able to purchase Nexplanon for our patient population at Contra Costa
Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Centers.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Irene M. Segovia, 925-335-7474
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.38
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Purchase Order with Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. (dba Curascript Specialty Distribution)
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-421-1 with
Telemedicine Group P.C. (dba TeleMed2U), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,800,000, to provide behavioral health and medical
psychiatric telehealth services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in contractual expenditures of up to $1,800,000 over a three-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP
Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized behavioral health services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group
Health Plan membership contracts with the County. Services for behavioral health and medical psychiatric telehealth services include electronic
video and communication technologies to facilitate outpatient therapy services including diagnosis, consultation, treatment, medication
management, education, and care management services for CCHP members. Contractor has been providing behavioral health services via
telehealth since January 1, 2022.
On February 8, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-421 with Telemedicine Group P.C. (dba TeleMed2U) in the amount of
$1,200,000 for the provision of behavioral health and medical psychiatric telehealth services to CCHP members for the period January 1, 2022
through December 31, 2022.
Approval of Contract #77-421-1 will allow the contractor to continue providing behavioral health and medical psychiatric telehealth services for
CCHP members through December 31, 2025.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm
C.39
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #77-421-1 with Telemedicine Group P.C. (dba TeleMed2U)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized behavioral health services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group
Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided timely and result in wait time for patients.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement
#25-077-13 with Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing, Inc. (dba Hope Solutions), a non-profit corporation, to amend Contract
#25-077-12, effective January 1, 2023, to increase the payment limit by $375,000, from $615,282 to a new total payment limit of $990,282, with
no change in the term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This amendment will result in additional expenditures up to $375,000 for FY 2022/2023 and will be funded 100% by State Housing Security
funds. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
This contract meets the social needs of county’s population by providing support services to Contra Costa County families who are homeless,
including case management, day shelter services, transportation needs, mental health assessment and crisis intervention. Contra Costa Interfaith
Transitional Housing, Inc. (dba Hope Solutions) has been providing case management and housing navigation services for the county’s CE
system since November 2016.
On August 16, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25-077-12 with Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing, Inc. (dba
Hope Solutions), in an amount not to exceed $615,282 to provide housing navigation services for the Coordinated Assessment Resource and
Engagement (CARE) Centers and CARE Capable Centers for the Homeless Coordinated Entry (CE) System, for the period from July 1, 2022
through June 30, 2023.
Approval of Amendment Agreement #25-077-13 will allow the contractor to provide additional housing support services through June 30,
2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this amendment is not approved, some homeless individuals and families will not receive navigation services from this contractor.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Christy Saxton, 925-608-6700
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C.40
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Amendment #25-077-13 with Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing, Inc. (dba Hope Solutions)
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and
“Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in
positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS).
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speaker: Sharon Al.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.,
effective December 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $50,000 to a new payment limit of $230,000 and extend the term through March
31, 2024, for on-call stormwater consulting services, Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is funded by 100% Stormwater Utility Assessment Funds.
BACKGROUND:
The County Watershed Program (CWP) is responsible for implementing measures to reduce trash/litter and other pollutants of concern found in
local waterways in unincorporated Contra Costa County. As such, CWP requires routine and on-call assistance with coordination and support
for implementing the Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Plan and for control measures and activities related to provisions C.11,
Mercury Controls, and C.12, Polychlorinated Biphenyls controls, in order to comply with the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES (National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Permit (MRP) from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region
(Water Board).
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Michele Mancuso, (925)
313-2236
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Public Works Director, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michele Mancuso, Flood Control, County Watershed Program, Michael Taylor, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control
C.41
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:On-call Contract Amendment with Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., for On-call Stormwater Consulting Services. Project No.
7517-6W7263
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without the approval of this contract by the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County will be out of compliance with the MRP from the
Water Board.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-575-8 with Signature
Parking, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $738,056, to provide parking management services for Contra Costa
Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $738,056 over a 2-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital
Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
The county has been contracting with Signature Parking, LLC since January 2017 to provide parking management services for CCRMC
including stack parking and parking management to ease parking and eliminate patients missing appointments due to the lack of parking.
On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-575-7 with Signature Parking, LLC, in an amount not to exceed
$420,849, to provide parking management services at CCRMC, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022.
Approval of Contract #76-575-8 will allow the contractor to continue to provide parking management services for CCRMC through December
31, 2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, patients at CCRMC will continue to miss medical appointments due to lack of parking.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5501
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C.42
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #76-575-8 with Signature Parking, LLC
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #25–046–24 with Shelter,
Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,138,309, to provide support services for county residents experiencing
homelessness who have a disability and are receiving services in the Supportive Housing Program, for the period from December 1, 2022
through November 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,138,309 and will be funded 98.75% Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) ($1,123,980), and 1.25% Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) ($14,329). (Rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing housing support services to County residents experiencing
homelessness. Shelter Inc. has been providing housing support services to homeless County residents who have a disability and who are
enrolled in the Supportive Housing Program since August 2001.
On April 12, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25-046-23 with Shelter, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,073,302 to
provide housing support services to county residents who are homeless and have a disability for the period from December 1, 2021 through
November 30, 2022.
Approval of Contract #25-046-24 will allow the contractor to continue to provide housing support services through November 30, 2023.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, County residents who are homeless with a disability and are receiving services in the Supportive Housing
Program will not receive services from this contractor.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Christy Saxton, 925-608-6700
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C.43
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #25-046-24 with Shelter, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #25-079-7 with Portia
Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,179,313, to provide case
management and Rapid Resolution counseling to county residents who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless for the period from
October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in budgeted expenditures in an amount of $1,179,313 and is funded by 50% Adult Protective Services Home Safe
Program ($582,079), 30% Public Defender Funds ($358,444), 10% California Emergency Solutions Housing (CESH) ($118,386), 8% Housing
and Urban Development Grant ($100,000) and 2% Housing Security Funds ($20,404). (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
This contract meets the social needs of county’s population by providing support services to county residents who are homeless or at risk of
becoming homeless, including case management and homelessness Rapid Resolution counseling. Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and
Training Center has been providing homeless support services to the county since May 2018.
On December 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25-079-3 with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training to
provide case management and homelessness Rapid Resolution counseling to County residents who are homeless or at risk of becoming
homeless for the period from October 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021.
On September 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment/Extension Agreement #25-079-4 to increase the payment limit by
$304,977 to a new payment limit of $749,977, and to extend the termination date from June 30, 2021 to September 30, 2021 for additional
support services to county residents who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless.
On November 17, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment/Extension Agreement #25-079-5 to increase the payment limit by
$350,000 to a new payment limit of $1,099,977, and to extend the termination date form September 30, 2021 to September 30, 2022 to provide
additional homeless support services.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Christy Saxton, 925-608-6700
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C.44
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #25-079-7 with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment/Extension Agreement #25-079-6 to increase the payment limit by
$550,000, from $1,099,977 to a new payment limit of $1,649,977 with no change in the term to provide additional homeless support
services.
Approval of Contract #25-079-7 will allow the contractor to continue to provide services through June 30, 2023. This contract renewal was
delayed due to contractor submitting invoices late which obstructed the contract renewal negotiation process.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, county residents and families that are homeless or at risk of being homeless will not have access to
contractor’s support services.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”;
“Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and
Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and
Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS).
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute an Assignment and Assumption of Contract and Consent with
Gemalto Cogent, Inc. and Thales DIS, USA, Inc. to recognize the merger of Gemalto Cogent, Inc. into Thales DIS USA, Inc. effective
September 30, 2020.
2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Thales DIS, USA, Inc. to extend the
term from December 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023 plus two optional one-year term extensions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County Cost. $454,772.00 from CAL ID Funds.
BACKGROUND:
The California Identification System (Cal-ID) is the automated system maintained by the California Department of Justice (DOJ) for retaining
fingerprint files and identifying latent fingerprints. Cal-ID monies are collected from the fees from each vehicle registered, two dollars for
non-commercial vehicles and four dollars from commercial vehicles, and are used to fund
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.45
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Thales DIS USA/Gemalto Cogent Incorporated - Livescan
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
programs that enhance the capacity of the state and local law enforcement to provide automated mobile, fixed Livescan fingerprint capture
stations and Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS) that allow identification of individuals involved in motor vehicle crimes. The
California Department of Justice has established the Remote Access Network (RAN), which is a uniform statewide network of equipment and
procedures allowing local law enforcement agencies direct access to the Cal-ID System. The Contra Costa County local RAN board determines
the placement of RAN equipment within the County, and coordinates the acceptance, delivery, and installation of RAN equipment. Acting as the
local RAN board, mobile fingerprint identification hardware has been distributed to local law enforcement agencies within the County pursuant
to the criteria specified in the Penal Code. Under the proposed contract, maintenance and support for the Livescan will be purchased to provide
support and hardware replacement so that local law enforcement agencies can continue to capture arrest data and booking related fingerprints.
The Livescans are a high-use device and parts wear out frequently. If maintenance and support is not obtained, replacement of the hardware and
updates to the software will no longer be supported. The Gemalto Cogent Livescans provide the mechanism for the capture of fingerprints,
photos and charge information as state and federally mandated for arrest reporting to the California Department of Justice and the Federal
Bureau of Investigations. The maintenance and support agreement will provide 24/7 support and hardware replacement to keep the Livescans in
working order. On September 30, 2020, Gemalto Cogent, Inc. was merged into Thales DIS, USA, Inc. Authority to execute the Assignment and
Assumption will result in Thales DIS USA, Inc. becoming a party to the contract. The Assignment and Assumption is retroactively dated to
September 30, 2020, since that is the effective date of the merger of Gemalto into Thales.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Office of the Sheriff is not allowed to contract with Gemalto Cogent for the Livescan Maintenance and Support for the Livescan
fingerprint capture stations, agencies in the county will experience extended downtime preventing officers from capturing the requisite
fingerprint and arrest/booking data required by the state and federal mandates. This may lead to the release of wanted subjects from booking
facilities because they have not been identified. Some subjects may be wanted for a more serious offense under another name. In addition, the
lack of ability to identify an arrested subject may detain an individual that is not the person sought in a warrant or an investigation.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner or designee, to execute an Agreement with Attenti US, Inc., in an amount not to exceed
$700,000 for the purchase of electronic home monitoring services, equipment and related products as needed at the Sheriff's Office Custody
Alternative Facility for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$700,000; 100% Sheriff Budgeted.
BACKGROUND:
The Sheriff's Office operates an Electronic Home Detention program intended as an alternative to incarceration for those persons who are
qualified for home detention. This program provides significant savings to the Country when compared to regular incarceration. It also keeps
the County within the daily population standard as required in the three detention facilities. Attenti US, Inc. (formerly 3M Electronic
Monitoring) develops, manufactures and provides innovative technology products for the criminal justice industry that help ensure the safety of
communities and efficient, secure monitoring and tracking operations. Attenti is a leading global provider of
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.46
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Attenti US, Inc.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
presence and location verification technologies and offers a complete suite of proprietary products and services. The vendor's solutions can be
customized, and are based upon a full-featured, integrated platform that is scalable and highly flexible to meet the CCC Office of the Sheriff's
unique needs now and in the future.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Negative action by the Board of Supervisors would result in no contract with this vendor and would reduce the Sheriff's Office options for
alternatives to incarceration.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with McHale's
Environmental Insulation, Inc., to extend the term from December 31, 2022 through April 30, 2023 and increase the payment limit by $50,000
to a new payment limit of $230,000, to provide additional insulation services to low-income County residents through the Department’s
Weatherization Program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The costs of the proposed amendment will be covered entirely by state and federal Weatherization Program Funds and will enable completion of
a variety of weatherization projects throughout the county. There will be no impact on the County General Fund.
BACKGROUND:
The Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) has partnered with the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) for
the past 20 years to provide energy-saving home improvements to low-income families throughout unincorporated Contra Costa County, as
well as the county’s 19 cities. This funding is provided by state and federal grant programs including, but not limited to, the Low-Income Home
Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), the Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP), and the Department of Energy (DOE).
With these grants, the Weatherization Program may provide homes with hot water heaters, furnaces, refrigerators, microwaves, doors, windows,
LED (light emitting diode) light bulbs, LED night lights, Tier 2 Advanced power strips, occupancy sensors, weather-stripping, ceiling fans, and
attic insulation.
Homes receive a blower door test (a diagnostic tool to locate and correct air infiltration), and homes with gas appliances receive a combustion
appliance safety test that checks for carbon monoxide gas leakage. Homes with gas appliances are provided with a carbon monoxide alarm.
Many contracts with current Weatherization Program vendors providing services are expiring July 31, 2023.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Laura Glass, 925-655-3023
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C.47
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Weatherization Contract Amendment - McHale's Environmental Insulation, Inc (46296-01)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Under its grant funding contract, the Weatherization Program is required to meet minimum unit production goals (number of homes
weatherized) by the end of its annual grant contract term. Failure to maintain the required production goals may result in the State reallocating
our share of funding to other counties and could jeopardize our future funding. This contract amendment is necessary because we have need for
additional services from McHales Environmental Insulation that will allow the Weatherization Program to have ready access to insulation
services and other necessary supplies and equipment to weatherize homes and meet production goals.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
A denial would prevent DCD Weatherization Program from replacing or repairing additional insulation for low-income County residents.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Approval of this item will enable the Weatherization Program to purchase materials necessary to provide home energy efficiency improvements
to low-income households, which reduces living expenses and improves comfort and quality of life for children residing in the households
served. This supports outcomes Nos. 3 and 5 established in the Children's Report Card: (3) Families are economically self-sufficient; and (5)
Families are safe, stable and nurturing.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Receive and accept the 2022 Annual Report of the Treasury Oversight Committee, as recommended by the Contra Costa County Treasurer-Tax
Collector.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1 which requires that each advisory board, commission, or
committee report annually on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/ certification, and proposed work plan
or objectives for the following year. This Annual Report is due to the Board of Supervisors in December.
The attached report fulfills this requirement for the Treasury Oversight Committee.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Treasury Oversight Committee would not be in compliance with Board Resolution 2020/1
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 608-9506
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.48
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:2022 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TREASURY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
ATTACHMENTS
2022 TOC Annual
Report_Final
Advisory Body Name:
Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location:
Chair (during the reporting period):
Staff Person (during the reporting period):
Reporting Period:
I. Activities (estimated response length: 1/2 page)
Describe the activities for the past year including areas of study, work, special events,
collaborations, etc.
ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT
II. Accomplishments (estimated response length: 1/2 page)
Describe the accomplishments for the past year, particularly in reference to your work plan and
objectives.
III.Attendance/Representation (estimated response length: 1/4 page)
Describe your membership in terms of seat vacancies, diversity, level of participation, and
frequency of achieving a quorum at meetings.
Describe the advisory body's workplan, including specific objectives to be achieved in the
upcoming year.
V. Proposed Work Plan/Objectives for Next Year
IV. Training/Certification (estimated response length: 1/4 page)
Describe any training that was provided or conducted, and any certifications received, either as a
requirement or done on an elective basis by members. NOTE: Please forward copies of any
training certifications to the Clerk of the Board.
(estimated response length: 1/2 page)
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of September 30, 2022, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
Government Code Section 53646 requires the County Treasurer to prepare quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors describing County
investments including type, par value, cost, and market value. Attached please find the report covering the period July 1, 2022 through
September 30, 2022.
As of Septebmber 30, 2022, the par value, cost, and market value of Contra Costa County Investment Pool were $4,555,524,748.52,
$4,542,945,409.10, and $4,445,037,073.71 respectively. The weighted yield to maturity was 2.29% and the weighted average days to maturity
were 306 days.
As of September 30, 2022, the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq. and with the
Treasurer’s current investment policy. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 608-9506
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.49
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ADOPTION OF THE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF 09/30/2022
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
County should be able to meet its obligations for the next six months.
ATTACHMENTS
Q3_2022 TOC Report_Final
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
TREASURER’S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Executive Summary 1
II. Contra Costa County Investment Pool Summary 2
III. Appendix
A. Investment Portfolio Detail—Managed by Treasurer’s Office
1. Portfolio Statement 6
B. Investment Portfolio Detail – Managed by Outside Contracted Parties
1. PFM 16
2. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund 23
3. Allspring Global Investments 24
4. CAMP 49
5. CalTRUST Liquidity*
6. US Bank 55
7. Other
a. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority
(EBRCS) 59
*No Treasury Pool assets were invested in the CalTRUST Liquidity fund during the quarter.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code
53600 et. seq..
• The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Treasurer's
current investment policy.
• The Treasurer’s investment portfolio has no securities lending, reverse
repurchase agreements or derivatives.
• As of 9/30/22, the fair value of the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was 97.84%
of the cost. More than 75 percent of the portfolio or over $3.4 billion will mature
in less than a year. Historical activities combined with future cash flow
projections indicate that the County should be able to meet its cash flow needs
for the next six months.
• Treasurer’s Investment Portfolio Characteristics
Par $4,555,524,748.52
Cost $4,542,945,409.10
Market Value $4,445,037,073.71
Weighted Yield to Maturity 2.29%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 306 days
Weighted Duration 0.76 year
Notes:
1. All reporting information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its
preparation. The information in this report may be updated and is subject to
change without notice. Changes will be reflected in the next report.
2. There may be minor differences between the investment pool summary pages
and the attached statements and exhibits from time to time. The variances are
largely due to rounding errors, the timing difference in recording and/or posting
transactions, interests, security values, etc.
3. All securities and amounts reported are denominated in U.S. Dollars.
Page 1
PERCENT OF
TYPE PAR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE TOTAL COST
A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office
1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes)$137,110,000.00 $136,787,062.18 $136,457,646.09 3.01%
2. U.S. Agencies
Federal Home Loan Banks 580,200,000.00 576,951,525.79 558,552,321.24 12.70%
Federal National Mortgage Association 141,000,000.00 140,930,079.85 129,552,806.01 3.10%
Federal Farm Credit Banks 227,856,000.00 227,712,877.51 212,158,087.90 5.01%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 170,000,000.00 169,984,618.81 159,463,769.30 3.74%
Subtotal 1,119,056,000.00 1,115,579,101.96 1,059,726,984.45 24.56%
3. Supranationals - International Government 446,120,000.00 444,074,524.99 427,808,005.61 9.78%
4. Money Market Instruments
Commercial Paper 1,305,252,000.00 1,299,148,914.27 1,297,979,774.82 28.60%
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 780,000,000.00 779,998,501.82 778,245,107.22 17.17%
Time Deposit 3,404.12 3,404.12 3,404.12 0.00%
Subtotal 2,085,255,404.12 2,079,150,820.21 2,076,228,286.16 45.77%
5. Corporate Notes 159,445,000.00 158,913,365.44 144,768,009.98 3.50%
TOTAL (Section A.)1 3,946,986,404.12 3,934,504,874.78 3,844,988,932.29 86.61%
B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors
1. PFM 75,862,003.27 75,778,887.09 72,264,776.54 1.67%
2. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)232,010,259.99 232,010,259.99 227,546,605.78 2 5.11%
3. Allspring Global Investments
5 44,101,418.77 44,086,724.87 43,672,096.73 3 0.97%
4. CAMP 183,680,466.27 183,680,466.27 183,680,466.27 4.04%
5. CalTRUST (Liquidity Fund)- - - 0.00%
6. US Bank (Federated Tax Free Cash Fund)5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 0.13%
7. Other
a.EBRCS Bond 1,059,410.99 1,059,410.99 1,059,410.99 0.02%
TOTAL (Section B.)542,558,654.23 542,460,844.15 534,068,451.25 11.94%
C. Cash 65,979,690.17 65,979,690.17 65,979,690.17 1.45%
4GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$4,555,524,748.52 $4,542,945,409.10 $4,445,037,073.71 100.00%
Notes:
1. Excludes funds managed by PFM retained by Contra Costa School Insurance Group and Community College District
2. Estimated Fair Value
3. Base Market Value plus Accrued Interest
4. Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority
5. After completion of acquisition, WFAM changed the name to Allspring Global Investments in November 2021.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
September 30, 2022
Page 2
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL - EARNING STATISTICS
Fiscal Quarter
Year To Date To Date
Average Daily Balance ($)4,610,617,252.44 4,610,617,252.44
Net Earnings ($)20,320,068.34 20,320,068.34
Earned Income Yield 1.72%1.72%
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL - PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
Investment Par Fair YTM WAM Percentage
Type Value Value of
($)($)(%)(days)Portfolio
U.S. Treasury 137,110,000.00 136,457,646.09 1.14 65 3.07%
Agencies 1,119,056,000.00 1,059,726,984.45 2.00 686 23.84%
Commercial Paper 1,305,252,000.00 1,297,979,774.82 2.73 56 29.20%
NCD/YCD 780,000,000.00 778,245,107.22 2.81 104 17.51%
Corporate Notes 159,445,000.00 144,768,009.98 1.49 1056 3.26%
Time Deposit 3,404.12 3,404.12 0.08 601 0.00%
Supranationals 446,120,000.00 427,808,005.61 2.07 508 9.62%
PFM 75,862,003.27 72,264,776.54 1.38 736 1.63%
LAIF 232,010,259.99 227,546,605.78 1.29 1 5.12%
CAMP 183,680,466.27 183,680,466.27 2.61 0 4.13%
CalTRUST (Liquidity)- - 0.00 0 0.00%
Allspring Global Investments 44,101,418.77 43,672,096.73 3.93 290 0.98%
US Bank (Federated Tax Free)5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 2.39 0 0.13%
Misc.1 1,059,410.99 1,059,410.99 N/A N/A 0.02%
Cash 65,979,690.17 65,979,690.17 0.93 2 0 1.48%
Total Fund3 4,555,524,748.52 4,445,037,073.71 2.29 306 100.00%
1. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority.
2. Average Earning Allowance of WFB for this quarter.
3. Excludes the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the CCCCD Retirment Board of Authority.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
September 30, 2022
Page 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
INVESTMENT POOL
AT A GLANCE
September 30, 2022
NOTES TO INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND AT A GLANCE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
1. All report information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its preparation. The information in the entire report may be updated and is subject to change without notice.
Changes will be reflected in the next report.
2. There may be slight differences between the portfolio summary/at a glace pages and the attached statements/exhibits from time to time.
The variances are largely due to the timing difference in recording and/or posting transactions, inerestes, security values, etc.
3. All securities and amounts included in the portfolio are denominated in United States Dollars.
4. The Contra Costa County investment portfolio maintains Standard & Poor's highest credit quality rating of AAAf and lowest volatility of S1+. The portfolio consists of a large
portion of short-term investments with credit rating of A-1/P-1 or better. The majority of the long-term investments in the portfolio are rated AA or better.
5. In accordance with Contra Costa County's Investment Policy, the Treasurer's Office has constructed a portfolio that safeguards the principal, meets the liquidity needs
and achieves a return. As a result, more than 75% of the portfolio will mature in less than a year with a weighted average maturity of 306 days.
U.S. Treasuries
3.01%
U.S.Agencies
24.56%
Supranationals
9.78%
Money Market
45.77%
Corporate Notes
3.50%
PFM
1.67%
LAIF
5.11%Wells
Cap
0.97%
CAMP
4.04%
CalTRUST
0.00%
US Bank
0.13%
Other
0.02%
Cash
1.45%
PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWN
BY INVESTMENT
75.75%
4.71%
9.47%7.57%2.49%
$0
$500,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,500,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$2,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$3,500,000,000
$4,000,000,000
1 yr & less 1 to 2 yrs 2 to 3 yrs 3 to 4 yrs 4+ yrs
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION
AAA
9.87%
AA+
19.77%
AA
6.10%
AA-
0.27%
A+
0.67%A
0.40%A-
0.18%
A-1+
39.83%
A-1
21.21%
NR (CASH)
1.45%
NR (Misc.)
0.21%
BBB+
0.04%
PORTFOLIO CREDIT QUALITY
2.29%2.36%
1.38%1.29%
3.93%
2.61%2.39%
0.93%
2.02%2.08%
-0.14%
1.51%1.74%
2.41%
1.71%
0.93%
-0.50%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
Total Treasurer PFM LAIF Allspring CAMP US Bank Cash
YTM AND INCOME YIELD
YTM Income Yield
Total consists of 86% Treasurer, 2% of PFM; 5% LAIF; 1% Allspring; 4% of CAMP and 2% of others approximately.
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
12/19 3/20 6/20 9/20 12/20 3/21 6/21 9/21 12/21 3/22 6/22 9/22
QUARTERLY WEIGHTED YIELD TO MATURITY
YTM
County&Agencies
51.55%
School Dist.
33.40%
Community College
Dist.
7.04%
Voluntary
Participants
8.01%
POOL BALANCE BY PARTICIPANTS
Note:Percentages are approximate. More than 42% of the School Dist. funds from the bond proceeds.
Page 4
Note:
All data provided by Bloomberg.
MAJOR MARKET AND ECONOMIC DATA
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
09/02 09/04 09/06 09/08 09/10 09/12 09/14 09/16 09/18 09/20 09/22PercentageTREASURY YIELDS AND FED TARGET RATE
US 2-YR TREASURY YIELD US 5-YR TREASURY YIELD FEDERAL FUND TARGET RATE
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
09/30/2209/30/1909/30/1609/30/1309/30/1009/30/0709/30/0409/30/01Percentage GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
GDP QoQ Change
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Sep-22Sep-20Sep-18Sep-16Sep-14Sep-12Sep-10Sep-08Sep-06Sep-04Sep-02Sep-00Percentage CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
CPI YoY Change Core CPI YoY Change
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Sep-03 Sep-05 Sep-07 Sep-09 Sep-11 Sep-13 Sep-15 Sep-17 Sep-19 Sep-21PercentageEMPLOYMENT RELATED RATES
Unemployment Rate Underemployment Rate
Page 5
SECTION III
APPENDIX
A. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL -
MANAGED BY TREASURER’S OFFICE
Notes:
1. Statements are generated by the SymPro Treasury Management Software system beginning first
quarter of calendar year 2022.
2. Market pricing data are obtained from Interactive Data Corporation/ICE.
YTM
365
Page 1
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Time Deposits
0.081WESTAMERICA BANK - TIME DEP86232 3,404.12 3,404.12 05/24/20240.08005/24/2021 3,404.12 N/A121101042B 601
3,404.123,404.123,404.123,404.12Subtotal and Average 0.081 601
Negotiable CDs
1.683SWEDBANK NY - YCD90190 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 10/11/20221.66005/26/2022 29,986,860.00 A-187019WBY0 10
2.474CREDIT AG NY - YCD90236 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 10/17/20222.44007/07/2022 34,988,905.00 A-122536AUX0 16
2.474CREDIT AG NY - YCD90237 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 10/19/20222.44007/07/2022 34,987,575.00 A-122536AUW2 18
2.879CREDIT SUISSE NY - YCD90259 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 10/24/20222.84007/25/2022 29,994,630.00 A-122552GCA6 23
1.876SWEDBANK NY - YCD90192 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 10/27/20221.85005/27/2022 30,000,000.00 A-187019WBZ7 26
2.078TORONTO DOM NY - YCD90212 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 11/01/20222.05006/15/2022 29,969,880.00 A-1+89114WZ24 31
2.819NORDEA BK NY - YCD90243 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 11/09/20222.78007/14/2022 29,987,820.00 A-1+65558UUZ3 39
2.839NORDEA BK NY - YCD90244 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 11/14/20222.80007/14/2022 29,986,380.00 A-1+65558UUY6 44
1.703RBC NY - YCD90128 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 11/14/20221.68004/12/2022 34,930,210.00 A-1+78012U5B7 44
2.890RBC NY - YCD90254 5,000,000.00 4,998,501.82 11/15/20220.40007/21/2022 4,995,417.22 A-1+78012UY90 45
2.160NORDEA BK NY - YCD90206 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 11/28/20222.13006/09/2022 49,911,350.00 A-1+65558UUJ9 58
2.281SWEDBANK NY - YCD90209 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 11/29/20222.25006/13/2022 29,947,140.00 A-187019WCH6 59
2.535NORDEA BK NY - YCD90213 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 12/01/20222.50006/15/2022 29,961,870.00 A-1+65558UUM2 61
2.231NORDEA BK NY - YCD90203 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 12/23/20222.20006/06/2022 49,856,450.00 A-1+65558UUB6 83
3.680CREDIT AG NY - YCD90331 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 12/27/20223.63009/26/2022 34,999,440.00 A-122536AN91 87
3.001TORONTO DOM NY - YCD90268 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 12/29/20222.96008/01/2022 34,951,630.00 A-1+89115BDS6 89
3.163RBC NY - YCD90228 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 01/30/20233.12006/29/2022 34,911,450.00 A-1+78012U7L3 121
2.078RBC NY - YCD90131 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 02/13/20232.05004/12/2022 34,747,055.00 A-1+78012U5A9 135
2.778COOP RABOBANK NY - YCD90208 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 03/10/20232.74006/10/2022 29,835,870.00 A-121684XXZ4 160
4.350TORONTO DOM NY - YCD90342 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 03/27/20234.29009/29/2022 35,000,000.00 A-1+89115BX62 177
3.762RBC NY - YCD90218 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 06/09/20233.71006/22/2022 34,791,785.00 A-1+78012U6Z3 251
4.076RBC NY - YCD90271 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 07/03/20234.02008/08/2022 29,859,510.00 A-1+78015JAJ6 275
3.954RBC NY - YCD90249 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 07/19/20233.90007/19/2022 24,838,025.00 A-1+78015J5N3 291
4.268RBC NY - YCD90320 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 09/08/20234.21009/09/2022 34,805,855.00 A-1+78015JDA2 342
779,998,501.82778,245,107.22780,000,000.00708,826,930.80Subtotal and Average 2.810 104
Corporate Notes
0.566TOYOTA MCC - CORP86258 10,000,000.00 9,988,745.46 06/18/20240.50006/18/2021 9,323,000.00 A+89236TJH9 626
2.106BANK OF NY MELLON - CORP85315 5,500,000.00 5,499,364.32 10/24/20242.10010/24/2019 5,212,762.34 A06406RAL1 754
2.106BANK OF NY MELLON - CORP85316 4,500,000.00 4,499,479.90 10/24/20242.10010/24/2019 4,264,987.37 A06406RAL1 754
1.240GUARDIAN LIFE GLOB FUND - CORP86549 10,000,000.00 9,962,743.79 06/23/20251.10012/02/2021 8,983,390.80 AA+40139LAG8 996
4.616WALMART INC - CORP90341 11,000,000.00 10,809,518.46 09/09/20253.90009/29/2022 10,827,422.06 AA931142EW9 1,074
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
Page 6
YTM
365
Page 2
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Corporate Notes
1.079NEW YORK LIFE - CORP86281 10,000,000.00 9,926,670.26 01/15/20260.85007/01/2021 8,793,003.50 AA+64952WDW0 1,202
1.160NEW YORK LIFE - CORP86244 10,000,000.00 9,996,384.89 06/09/20261.15006/09/2021 8,734,022.30 AA+64952WED1 1,347
1.941MET LIFE GLOB FUND - CORP86587 10,000,000.00 9,984,060.10 01/11/20271.87501/14/2022 8,749,800.00 AA-59217GER6 1,563
70,666,967.1864,888,388.3771,000,000.0060,576,151.78Subtotal and Average 1.849 1,080
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
1.684MUFG BK LTD - CP90173 30,000,000.00 29,997,250.00 10/03/20221.65005/17/2022 29,992,530.00 A-162479MK36 2
2.377SWEDBANK - CP90233 35,000,000.00 34,990,938.89 10/05/20222.33007/05/2022 34,985,230.00 A-187019SK52 4
2.306CREDIT AG - CP90232 30,000,000.00 29,988,700.00 10/07/20222.26007/01/2022 29,982,150.00 A-122533UK77 6
1.805TORONTO DOM - CP90171 35,000,000.00 34,989,675.00 10/07/20221.77005/13/2022 34,979,175.00 A-1+89116FK74 6
1.805TORONTO DOM - CP90172 30,000,000.00 29,985,250.00 10/11/20221.77005/13/2022 29,971,800.00 A-1+89116FKB5 10
2.397SOCIETE GENERALE - CP90240 30,000,000.00 29,978,458.33 10/12/20222.35007/11/2022 29,969,160.00 A-183369CKC7 11
2.720SWEDBANK - CP90245 30,000,000.00 29,973,350.00 10/13/20222.66507/14/2022 29,966,790.00 A-187019SKD5 12
2.690SWEDBANK - CP90246 30,000,000.00 29,971,454.17 10/14/20222.63507/15/2022 29,964,210.00 A-187019SKE3 13
2.398METLIFE ST FDG - CP90239 30,000,000.00 29,966,708.33 10/18/20222.35007/11/2022 29,953,890.00 A-1+59157UKJ8 17
1.850SOCIETE GENERALE - CP90174 30,000,000.00 29,963,800.00 10/25/20221.81005/17/2022 29,934,450.00 A-183369CKR4 24
1.922TOYOTA MCC - CP90185 30,000,000.00 29,960,833.33 10/26/20221.88005/23/2022 29,932,830.00 A-1+89233HKS2 25
1.818CREDIT AG - CP90196 35,000,000.00 34,955,005.54 10/27/20221.78006/01/2022 34,918,975.00 A-122533UKT9 26
2.699KOCH INDUSTRIES - CP90308 35,000,000.00 34,930,437.50 10/28/20222.65008/26/2022 34,915,825.00 A-1+50000EKU7 27
1.891MUFG BK LTD - CP90194 30,000,000.00 29,953,750.00 10/31/20221.85005/31/2022 29,920,260.00 A-162479MKX0 30
1.932CREDIT AG - CP90197 20,000,000.00 19,966,400.00 11/02/20221.89006/03/2022 19,943,020.00 A-122533UL27 32
2.567TOYOTA MCC - CP90234 35,000,000.00 34,909,709.72 11/07/20222.51007/06/2022 34,883,030.00 A-1+89233HL77 37
2.035SOCIETE GENERALE - CP90204 35,000,000.00 34,922,611.11 11/10/20221.99006/08/2022 34,872,460.00 A-183369CLA0 40
2.641METLIFE ST FDG - CP90238 35,000,000.00 34,879,600.00 11/18/20222.58007/08/2022 34,847,505.00 A-1+59157ULJ7 48
2.804NORDEA BK - CP90247 35,000,000.00 34,872,133.33 11/18/20222.74007/18/2022 34,849,920.00 A-1+65558KLJ1 48
1.841METLIFE ST FDG - CP90198 15,252,000.00 15,211,582.20 11/23/20221.80006/03/2022 15,178,149.82 A-1+59157ULP3 53
2.016MUFG BK LTD - CP90202 35,000,000.00 34,898,490.25 11/23/20221.97006/06/2022 34,830,740.00 A-162479MLP6 53
2.684TOYOTA MCC - CP90235 35,000,000.00 34,859,902.78 11/25/20222.62007/06/2022 34,820,765.00 A-1+89233HLR3 55
3.075CREDIT AG - CP90313 35,000,000.00 34,824,416.67 11/30/20223.01008/31/2022 34,805,330.00 A-122533ULW1 60
2.699TOYOTA MCC - CP90217 30,000,000.00 29,864,116.67 12/02/20222.63006/21/2022 29,823,960.00 A-1+89233HM27 62
3.067CREDIT AG - CP90310 35,000,000.00 34,807,500.00 12/06/20223.00008/29/2022 34,781,390.00 A-122533UM67 66
2.670MUFG BK LTD - CP90211 40,000,000.00 39,806,444.43 12/07/20222.60006/15/2022 39,745,600.00 A-162479MM75 67
2.826CREDIT AG - CP90214 30,000,000.00 29,841,875.05 12/09/20222.75006/16/2022 29,802,060.00 A-122533UM91 69
3.025TOYOTA MCC - CP90262 40,000,000.00 39,764,000.00 12/12/20222.95007/26/2022 39,719,080.00 A-1+89233HMC5 72
3.073CREDIT AG - CP90301 35,000,000.00 34,778,333.41 12/16/20223.00008/17/2022 34,739,460.00 A-122533UMG5 76
3.704CREDIT AG - CP90328 25,000,000.00 24,796,375.00 12/21/20223.62009/22/2022 24,798,350.00 A-122533UMM2 81
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 7
YTM
365
Page 3
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
3.237MUFG BK LTD - CP90264 35,000,000.00 34,733,562.50 12/27/20223.15007/27/2022 34,689,165.00 A-162479MMT7 87
3.736MUFG BK LTD - CP90330 35,000,000.00 34,691,270.84 12/27/20223.65009/26/2022 34,689,165.00 A-162479MMT7 87
3.248MUFG BK LTD - CP90263 35,000,000.00 34,729,644.40 12/28/20223.16007/27/2022 34,684,405.00 A-162479MMU4 88
3.374TOYOTA MCC - CP90314 35,000,000.00 34,696,131.94 01/04/20233.29009/01/2022 34,656,055.00 A-1+89233HN42 95
2.479RBC - CP90207 35,000,000.00 34,765,694.44 01/09/20232.41006/09/2022 34,625,780.00 A-1+78009BN99 100
3.223METLIFE ST FDG - CP90304 35,000,000.00 34,691,669.44 01/10/20233.14008/23/2022 34,637,715.00 A-1+59157UNA4 101
3.893TOYOTA MCC - CP90336 35,000,000.00 34,565,202.78 01/27/20233.79009/27/2022 34,557,915.00 A-1+89233HNT7 118
3.936MUFG BK LTD - CP90338 35,000,000.00 34,545,719.44 01/31/20233.83009/28/2022 34,531,945.00 A-162479MNX7 122
3.701TORONTO DOM - CP90337 35,000,000.00 34,573,000.00 01/31/20233.60009/28/2022 34,551,440.00 A-1+89116FNX4 122
3.852METLIFE ST FDG - CP90345 35,000,000.00 34,547,916.78 02/02/20233.75009/30/2022 34,528,095.00 A-1+59157UP20 124
1,299,148,914.271,297,979,774.821,305,252,000.001,271,950,187.83Subtotal and Average 2.725 56
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
2.620FHLB - AGENCY84835 2,000,000.00 1,999,572.13 12/09/20222.50001/16/2019 1,996,150.50 AA+3130A3KM5 69
2.543FNMA - AGENCY84892 6,000,000.00 5,997,124.47 01/19/20232.37502/28/2019 5,976,735.06 AA+3135G0T94 110
2.470FNMA - AGENCY84909 5,000,000.00 4,998,640.10 01/19/20232.37503/08/2019 4,980,612.55 AA+3135G0T94 110
2.100FFCB - AGENCY85078 2,900,000.00 2,901,470.15 02/08/20232.25005/30/2019 2,887,564.10 AA+3133EKKT2 130
0.318FFCB - AGENCY85648 20,000,000.00 19,991,310.61 05/22/20230.25005/28/2020 19,526,082.20 AA+3133ELA87 233
2.136FFCB - AGENCY90189 10,000,000.00 9,997,725.00 05/25/20232.10005/25/2022 9,869,001.70 AA+3133ENXP0 236
0.348FHLMC - AGENCY85688 20,000,000.00 19,985,670.37 06/26/20230.25006/26/2020 19,440,992.20 AA+3137EAES4 268
1.921FFCB - AGENCY85102 4,956,000.00 4,965,000.24 09/05/20232.12506/14/2019 4,853,894.60 AA+3133EKPG5 339
0.261FHLMC - AGENCY85769 10,000,000.00 9,998,974.08 09/08/20230.25009/04/2020 9,623,758.00 AA+3137EAEW5 342
3.480FFCB - AGENCY90215 10,000,000.00 9,962,270.00 06/17/20243.25006/17/2022 9,824,572.10 AA+3133ENYX2 625
3.273FFCB - AGENCY90216 10,000,000.00 9,996,218.44 06/17/20243.25006/17/2022 9,824,572.10 AA+3133ENYX2 625
1.661FNMA - AGENCY85280 20,000,000.00 19,986,030.72 10/15/20241.62510/18/2019 18,982,444.40 AA+3135G0W66 745
1.661FNMA - AGENCY85281 10,000,000.00 9,993,015.36 10/15/20241.62510/18/2019 9,491,222.20 AA+3135G0W66 745
1.027FHLB - AGENCY86558 10,000,000.00 9,994,114.97 12/20/20241.00012/22/2021 9,297,596.70 AA+3130AQF40 811
1.370FFCB - AGENCY86598 10,000,000.00 9,988,779.63 01/21/20251.32001/21/2022 9,346,424.10 AA+3133ENLU2 843
1.820FFCB - AGENCY90013 10,000,000.00 9,983,928.18 02/14/20251.75002/15/2022 9,425,566.90 AA+3133ENPG9 867
2.750FFCB - AGENCY90138 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 04/25/20252.75004/25/2022 9,642,804.60 AA+3133ENVC1 937
0.542FNMA - AGENCY85679 20,000,000.00 19,977,527.03 06/17/20250.50006/19/2020 18,078,860.20 AA+3135G04Z3 990
0.705FHLB - AGENCY86282 10,000,000.00 9,998,648.23 06/30/20250.70007/06/2021 9,045,913.60 AA+3130AN4A5 1,003
4.475FFCB - AGENCY90344 10,000,000.00 9,937,557.87 09/30/20254.25009/30/2022 9,973,599.70 AA+3133ENP95 1,095
0.573FNMA - AGENCY85911 10,000,000.00 9,977,742.17 11/07/20250.50011/12/2020 8,906,895.40 AA+3135G06G3 1,133
220,631,319.75210,995,262.91220,856,000.00211,854,111.60Subtotal and Average 1.544 637
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 8
YTM
365
Page 4
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Federal Agency Disc. -Amortizing
3.170FHLB - AGENCY90323 3,500,000.00 3,488,061.11 11/10/20223.07009/19/2022 3,488,382.31 A-1+313385N85 40
3.170FHLB - AGENCY90324 2,200,000.00 2,192,495.55 11/10/20223.07009/19/2022 2,192,697.45 A-1+313385N85 40
3.170FHLB - AGENCY90325 13,000,000.00 12,955,655.56 11/10/20223.07009/19/2022 12,956,848.58 A-1+313385N85 40
2.649FHLB - AGENCY90296 6,000,000.00 5,981,226.67 11/14/20222.56008/16/2022 5,977,991.40 A-1+313385P42 44
2.649FHLB - AGENCY90297 2,400,000.00 2,392,490.67 11/14/20222.56008/16/2022 2,391,196.56 A-1+313385P42 44
2.649FHLB - AGENCY90298 1,700,000.00 1,694,680.89 11/14/20222.56008/16/2022 1,693,764.23 A-1+313385P42 44
2.914FHLB - AGENCY90305 30,000,000.00 29,824,375.00 12/15/20222.81008/24/2022 29,793,204.30 A-1+313385T30 75
2.875FHLB - AGENCY90306 30,000,000.00 29,822,033.33 12/16/20222.81008/24/2022 29,790,381.30 A-1+313385T48 76
3.100FHLB - AGENCY90311 35,000,000.00 34,723,548.61 01/03/20233.02508/30/2022 34,682,519.55 A-1+313384AC3 94
3.616FHLB - AGENCY90326 30,000,000.00 29,704,199.91 01/11/20233.48009/21/2022 29,704,327.80 A-1+313384AL3 102
3.710FHLB - AGENCY90332 35,000,000.00 34,639,033.34 01/13/20233.57009/26/2022 34,648,184.90 A-1+313384AN9 104
3.661FHLB - AGENCY90333 35,000,000.00 34,625,150.00 01/17/20233.57009/26/2022 34,634,460.35 A-1+313384AS8 108
3.288FHLB - AGENCY90317 30,000,000.00 29,694,533.33 01/25/20233.16009/09/2022 29,663,166.90 A-1+313384BA6 116
3.765FHLB - AGENCY90334 30,000,000.00 29,624,337.50 02/01/20233.66509/27/2022 29,626,281.30 A-1+313384BH1 123
3.456FHLB - AGENCY90318 35,000,000.00 34,530,163.89 02/24/20233.31009/09/2022 34,481,734.35 A-1+313384CG2 146
2.204FHLB - AGENCY90181 1,500,000.00 1,479,955.00 05/17/20232.11005/19/2022 1,464,214.07 A-1+313384FS3 228
2.204FHLB - AGENCY90182 13,000,000.00 12,826,276.67 05/17/20232.11005/19/2022 12,689,855.23 A-1+313384FS3 228
3.329FHLB - AGENCY90295 5,000,000.00 4,862,188.89 08/11/20233.16008/12/2022 4,835,472.90 A-1+313384KG3 314
335,060,405.92334,714,683.48338,300,000.00257,343,794.84Subtotal and Average 3.298 108
Treasury Coupon Securities
2.661US TREASURY NOTES90183 1,500,000.00 1,498,232.39 04/30/20242.50005/19/2022 1,460,569.14 AA+91282CEK3 577
2.661US TREASURY NOTES90184 2,500,000.00 2,497,053.98 04/30/20242.50005/19/2022 2,434,281.90 AA+91282CEK3 577
1.261US TREASURY NOTES86597 2,500,000.00 2,492,351.09 01/15/20251.12501/21/2022 2,329,590.00 AA+91282CDS7 837
6,487,637.466,224,441.046,500,000.006,487,256.76Subtotal and Average 2.123 677
Treasury Bills
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86386 250,000.00 249,996.87 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 249,951.25 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86387 5,000,000.00 4,999,937.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 4,999,025.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86388 2,400,000.00 2,399,970.00 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 2,399,532.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86389 20,000,000.00 19,999,750.00 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 19,996,100.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86390 5,000,000.00 4,999,937.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 4,999,025.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86391 200,000.00 199,997.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 199,961.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86392 300,000.00 299,996.25 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 299,941.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86393 200,000.00 199,997.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 199,961.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86394 1,000,000.00 999,987.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 999,805.00 A-1+912796M89 5
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 9
YTM
365
Page 5
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Treasury Bills
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86395 350,000.00 349,995.62 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 349,931.75 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86396 5,000,000.00 4,999,937.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 4,999,025.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86397 500,000.00 499,993.75 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 499,902.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86398 6,000,000.00 5,999,925.00 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 5,998,830.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86399 250,000.00 249,996.87 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 249,951.25 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86400 2,300,000.00 2,299,971.25 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 2,299,551.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86401 150,000.00 149,998.12 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 149,970.75 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86402 5,000,000.00 4,999,937.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 4,999,025.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86403 600,000.00 599,992.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 599,883.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86404 8,500,000.00 8,499,893.75 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 8,498,342.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86405 200,000.00 199,997.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 199,961.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86406 1,000,000.00 999,987.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 999,805.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86407 3,500,000.00 3,499,956.25 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 3,499,317.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86408 600,000.00 599,992.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 599,883.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86409 400,000.00 399,995.00 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 399,922.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86410 300,000.00 299,996.25 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 299,941.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86411 1,500,000.00 1,499,981.25 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 1,499,707.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86412 1,000,000.00 999,987.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 999,805.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86413 900,000.00 899,988.75 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 899,824.50 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86414 200,000.00 199,997.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 199,961.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86415 1,800,000.00 1,799,977.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 1,799,649.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86416 200,000.00 199,997.50 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 199,961.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86417 400,000.00 399,995.00 10/06/20220.09010/08/2021 399,922.00 A-1+912796M89 5
0.093US TREASURY BILLS86418 1,610,000.00 1,609,979.88 10/06/20220.09010/12/2021 1,609,686.05 A-1+912796M89 5
1.549US TREASURY BILLS90179 4,000,000.00 3,992,192.78 11/17/20221.49505/19/2022 3,985,884.00 A-1+912796W62 47
1.549US TREASURY BILLS90180 15,000,000.00 14,970,722.92 11/17/20221.49505/19/2022 14,947,065.00 A-1+912796W62 47
3.034US TREASURY BILLS90309 35,000,000.00 34,727,466.66 01/05/20232.92008/29/2022 34,705,195.00 A-1+912796X95 96
130,299,424.72130,233,205.05130,610,000.00130,244,042.82Subtotal and Average 1.088 35
Federal Agency Callables
1.250FHLB - AGENCY90060 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 03/14/20231.25003/14/2022 9,871,264.30 AA+3130ARB42 164
2.247FHLB - AGENCY90188 20,000,000.00 19,998,784.54 06/23/20232.24005/25/2022 19,671,693.40 AA+3130ASAA7 265
0.320FHLMC - AGENCY85939 10,000,000.00 9,999,974.36 11/24/20230.32011/30/2020 9,538,153.50 AA+3134GXCA0 419
3.000FHLMC - AGENCY90195 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11/28/20233.00005/31/2022 9,847,362.00 AA+3134GXTW4 423
0.310FFCB - AGENCY85938 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11/30/20230.31011/30/2020 9,529,162.90 AA+3133EMHL9 425
0.320FNMA - AGENCY85957 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/07/20230.32012/07/2020 9,517,082.40 AA+3135GA6J5 432
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 10
YTM
365
Page 6
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Federal Agency Callables
0.500FHLMC - AGENCY85683 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 06/24/20240.50006/24/2020 18,763,422.20 AA+3134GVV96 632
3.320FHLB - AGENCY90261 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 07/26/20243.32007/26/2022 9,772,959.10 AA+3130ASN47 664
3.570FHLB - AGENCY90267 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 07/26/20243.57007/28/2022 9,811,929.30 AA+3130ASQR3 664
4.050FHLMC - AGENCY90327 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/20/20244.05009/20/2022 9,926,430.00 AA+3134GX2E3 720
2.175FHLMC - AGENCY90098 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/27/20242.20003/28/2022 9,559,165.30 AA+3134GXPZ1 727
1.000FHLB - AGENCY86586 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10/18/20241.00001/18/2022 9,308,341.20 AA+3130AQG64 748
1.200FHLB - AGENCY86559 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/23/20241.20012/23/2021 9,291,964.90 AA+3130AQBP7 814
0.956FHLB - AGENCY86574 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/30/20241.15012/30/2021 9,276,291.10 AA+3130AQ5X7 821
2.190FFCB - AGENCY90078 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 03/21/20252.19003/21/2022 9,455,196.90 AA+3133ENSK7 902
3.100FHLMC - AGENCY90148 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 04/29/20253.10004/29/2022 9,725,716.60 AA+3134GXRS5 941
3.250FHLMC - AGENCY90226 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/27/20253.25006/29/2022 9,733,710.30 AA+3134GXXS8 1,000
0.700FFCB - AGENCY85691 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 06/30/20250.70006/30/2020 17,881,773.60 AA+3133ELQ49 1,003
0.650FNMA - AGENCY85693 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 06/30/20250.65006/30/2020 18,056,562.20 AA+3136G4XK4 1,003
0.750FHLB - AGENCY86191 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 07/29/20250.75004/29/2021 9,120,142.90 AA+3130AM4P4 1,032
0.650FNMA - AGENCY85756 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 08/27/20250.65008/27/2020 8,956,508.80 AA+3136G4S87 1,061
0.550FFCB - AGENCY85783 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/16/20250.55009/16/2020 8,934,842.30 AA+3133EL7K4 1,081
0.554FFCB - AGENCY85800 10,000,000.00 9,998,810.72 09/16/20250.55009/25/2020 8,934,842.30 AA+3133EL7K4 1,081
0.500FHLMC - AGENCY85866 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/29/20250.50009/29/2020 8,884,709.90 AA+3134GWVC7 1,094
0.550FHLMC - AGENCY85795 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/30/20250.55009/30/2020 8,897,616.60 AA+3134GWWT9 1,095
0.500FHLMC - AGENCY85805 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/30/20250.50009/30/2020 8,881,980.80 AA+3134GWUE4 1,095
0.600FHLMC - AGENCY85860 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10/28/20250.60010/28/2020 8,887,499.60 AA+3134GW3Z7 1,123
0.600FNMA - AGENCY85871 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10/29/20250.60010/29/2020 8,886,627.10 AA+3136G46N8 1,124
0.574FFCB - AGENCY85874 10,000,000.00 9,989,806.67 11/03/20250.54011/03/2020 8,865,325.00 AA+3133EMFR8 1,129
0.640FHLMC - AGENCY85928 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11/24/20250.64011/24/2020 8,876,032.90 AA+3134GXEJ9 1,150
0.650FHLMC - AGENCY85937 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11/26/20250.65011/30/2020 8,877,219.40 AA+3134GXFA7 1,152
0.650FNMA - AGENCY85989 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/17/20250.65012/17/2020 8,859,668.90 AA+3135G06K4 1,173
0.640FNMA - AGENCY86001 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/30/20250.64012/30/2020 8,859,586.80 AA+3135G06Q1 1,186
0.580FHLB - AGENCY86065 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 02/11/20260.58002/11/2021 8,777,557.30 AA+3130AKXB7 1,229
1.050FFCB - AGENCY86128 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 03/25/20261.05003/25/2021 8,906,018.30 AA+3133EMUK6 1,271
1.000FHLB - AGENCY86175 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 04/22/20261.00004/22/2021 8,945,317.90 AA+3130ALX25 1,299
1.100FHLB - AGENCY86176 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 04/22/20261.10004/22/2021 8,886,152.30 AA+3130ALXV1 1,299
1.050FHLB - AGENCY86246 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/10/20261.05006/10/2021 8,834,821.30 AA+3130AMMY5 1,348
0.900FFCB - AGENCY86252 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/15/20260.90006/15/2021 8,797,001.40 AA+3133EMH21 1,353
0.910FFCB - AGENCY86278 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/30/20260.91006/30/2021 8,789,601.10 AA+3133EMP22 1,368
1.000FHLB - AGENCY86276 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/30/20261.00006/30/2021 8,833,267.50 AA+3130AMYJ5 1,368
1.000FHLB - AGENCY86279 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 06/30/20261.00006/30/2021 8,803,949.70 AA+3130AN2Z2 1,368
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 11
YTM
365
Page 7
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Federal Agency Callables
1.250FHLB - AGENCY86442 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10/28/20261.25010/28/2021 8,807,856.10 AA+3130APDQ5 1,488
1.500FHLB - AGENCY86511 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/02/20261.50012/02/2021 8,874,067.10 AA+3130APW43 1,523
1.600FFCB - AGENCY86538 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/14/20261.60012/14/2021 8,920,204.20 AA+3133ENHC7 1,535
1.600FFCB - AGENCY86550 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12/14/20261.60012/16/2021 8,920,204.20 AA+3133ENHC7 1,535
1.750FHLB - AGENCY86603 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 01/28/20271.75001/28/2022 8,930,604.70 AA+3130AQJH7 1,580
1.853FFCB - AGENCY86604 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 02/08/20271.86002/08/2022 9,049,833.60 AA+3133ENNG1 1,591
2.000FHLB - AGENCY86605 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 02/25/20272.00002/25/2022 9,053,130.70 AA+3130AQRH8 1,608
2.770FHLB - AGENCY90041 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 03/04/20272.77003/04/2022 9,267,845.00 AA+3130AR2H3 1,615
3.375FHLB - AGENCY90146 9,900,000.00 9,900,000.00 04/28/20273.37504/28/2022 9,346,237.46 AA+3130ARPD7 1,670
5.000FHLB - AGENCY90340 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 09/14/20275.00009/28/2022 10,012,583.70 AA+3130AT3P0 1,809
559,887,376.29514,017,038.06559,900,000.00544,553,825.68Subtotal and Average 1.391 1,055
Corporate Note Callables
2.669WALMART INC - CORP85010 10,000,000.00 9,993,790.29 12/15/20222.35004/17/2019 9,973,600.00 AA931142DU4 75
1.850TOYOTA MCC - CORP85501 13,150,000.00 13,135,186.09 02/13/20251.80002/13/2020 12,274,896.82 A+89236TGT6 866
0.765JOHNSON & JOHNS - CORP86327 15,295,000.00 15,200,732.90 09/01/20250.55008/12/2021 13,658,927.19 AAA478160CN2 1,066
0.712APPLE INC - CORP86060 10,000,000.00 9,996,057.13 02/08/20260.70002/08/2021 8,798,848.40 AA+037833EB2 1,226
0.726APPLE INC - CORP86061 10,000,000.00 9,991,416.89 02/08/20260.70002/08/2021 8,798,848.40 AA+037833EB2 1,226
0.758APPLE INC - CORP86289 10,000,000.00 9,980,917.26 02/08/20260.70002/18/2021 8,798,848.40 AA+037833EB2 1,226
1.066AMAZON - CORP86223 10,000,000.00 9,976,726.56 05/12/20261.00005/12/2021 8,787,826.20 AA023135BX3 1,319
1.081AMAZON - CORP86224 5,000,000.00 4,985,789.52 05/12/20261.00005/13/2021 4,393,913.10 AA023135BX3 1,319
1.081AMAZON - CORP86226 5,000,000.00 4,985,781.62 05/12/20261.00005/14/2021 4,393,913.10 AA023135BX3 1,319
88,246,398.2679,879,621.6188,445,000.0089,574,912.84Subtotal and Average 1.201 1,036
Supranationals
0.229IBRD - SUPRA86171 20,000,000.00 19,988,557.50 04/20/20230.12504/20/2021 19,577,461.00 AAA459058JV6 201
0.247IFC - SUPRA86372 10,000,000.00 9,998,318.89 09/27/20230.23009/27/2021 9,611,311.10 AAA45950VQH2 361
0.287IBRD - SUPRA85940 10,000,000.00 9,995,822.57 11/24/20230.25011/30/2020 9,544,644.50 AAA459058JM6 419
0.610IFC - SUPRA86494 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11/24/20230.61011/24/2021 9,565,846.40 AAA45950VQS8 419
2.353IBRD - SUPRA90099 10,000,000.00 9,985,041.78 03/28/20242.25003/30/2022 9,705,260.30 AAA45906M3C3 544
0.447IFC - SUPRA86352 10,000,000.00 9,996,699.17 09/10/20240.43009/10/2021 9,255,505.00 AAA45950VQE9 710
0.930IADB - SUPRA86499 10,000,000.00 9,997,838.89 11/29/20240.92011/29/2021 9,955,500.00 AAA45818WDK9 790
1.465IADB - SUPRA90006 10,000,000.00 9,985,056.03 02/10/20251.40002/10/2022 9,458,552.70 AAA45818WDQ6 863
0.655IFC - SUPRA86377 10,000,000.00 9,986,924.51 02/28/20250.60009/28/2021 9,121,602.90 AAA45950VQJ8 881
3.018IADB - SUPRA90149 10,000,000.00 9,995,703.70 04/29/20253.00004/29/2022 9,668,759.10 AAA45818WDN3 941
2.697IADB - SUPRA90199 10,000,000.00 9,987,975.00 06/03/20252.65006/03/2022 9,569,714.40 AAA45818WEB8 976
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 12
YTM
365
Page 8
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Supranationals
3.350IFC - SUPRA90307 10,000,000.00 9,994,528.67 08/25/20253.33008/25/2022 9,681,951.70 AAA45950VRG3 1,059
0.752IBRD - SUPRA86228 10,000,000.00 9,923,824.56 10/28/20250.50005/18/2021 8,897,507.60 AAA459058JL8 1,123
0.580IFC - SUPRA86017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 01/15/20260.58001/15/2021 8,834,807.20 AAA45950VPJ9 1,202
0.505IFC - SUPRA86039 15,000,000.00 14,973,010.33 02/05/20260.45002/05/2021 13,166,024.25 AAA45950VPL4 1,223
0.650IADB - SUPRA86079 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 02/20/20260.65002/24/2021 8,969,653.90 AAA45818WCZ7 1,238
0.914IADB - SUPRA86101 10,000,000.00 9,961,916.60 03/04/20260.80003/11/2021 8,987,740.00 AAA45818WDA1 1,250
0.969IADB - SUPRA86172 10,000,000.00 9,967,456.56 04/20/20260.87504/20/2021 8,871,900.00 AAA4581X0DV7 1,297
0.893IADB - SUPRA86188 10,000,000.00 9,993,790.57 04/20/20260.87504/28/2021 8,871,900.00 AAA4581X0DV7 1,297
0.900IFC - SUPRA86225 13,000,000.00 12,981,640.01 05/14/20260.86005/14/2021 11,452,631.32 AAA45950VPX8 1,321
0.818IADB - SUPRA86254 10,000,000.00 9,993,468.44 06/17/20260.80006/17/2021 8,817,335.30 AAA45818WDH6 1,355
227,707,573.78211,585,608.67228,000,000.00227,703,291.25Subtotal and Average 1.054 907
Supranational Discounts
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90276 3,000,000.00 2,991,766.67 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 2,990,565.27 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90277 1,400,000.00 1,396,157.78 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 1,395,597.13 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90278 3,900,000.00 3,889,296.67 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 3,887,734.85 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90279 3,000,000.00 2,991,766.67 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 2,990,565.27 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90280 4,000,000.00 3,989,022.22 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 3,987,420.36 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90281 5,300,000.00 5,285,454.44 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 5,283,331.98 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90282 287,000.00 286,212.34 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 286,097.41 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90283 5,264,000.00 5,249,553.24 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 5,247,445.19 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90284 489,000.00 487,657.97 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 487,462.14 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90285 204,000.00 203,440.13 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 203,358.44 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90286 4,647,000.00 4,634,246.57 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 4,632,385.60 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90287 855,000.00 852,653.50 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 852,311.10 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90288 2,200,000.00 2,193,962.22 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 2,193,081.20 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90289 3,900,000.00 3,889,296.67 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 3,887,734.85 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90290 18,000,000.00 17,950,600.00 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 17,943,391.62 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90291 1,445,000.00 1,441,034.28 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 1,440,455.61 A-1+459515N65 38
2.690IFC - SUPRA DISC90292 229,000.00 228,371.52 11/08/20222.60008/10/2022 228,279.82 A-1+459515N65 38
2.750IBRD - SUPRA DISC90293 30,000,000.00 29,834,375.00 12/15/20222.65008/11/2022 29,793,204.30 A-1+459053T38 75
2.750IBRD - SUPRA DISC90294 30,000,000.00 29,832,166.69 12/16/20222.65008/11/2022 29,790,381.30 A-1+459053T46 76
3.748IBRD - SUPRA DISC90339 35,000,000.00 34,573,000.00 01/31/20233.60009/28/2022 34,586,468.00 A-1+459052BG0 122
3.335IBRD - SUPRA DISC90319 35,000,000.00 34,589,333.30 02/10/20233.20009/09/2022 34,531,782.60 A-1+459052BS4 132
3.859IBRD - SUPRA90335 30,000,000.00 29,577,583.33 02/15/20233.70009/27/2022 29,583,342.90 A-1+459052BX3 137
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 13
YTM
365
Page 9
Par Value Book Value
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
216,366,951.21216,222,396.94218,120,000.00248,705,608.19Subtotal and Average 3.139 90
3,757,823,518.50 3,946,986,404.12 2.355 3373,844,988,932.29 3,934,504,874.78Total and Average
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 14
YTM
365
Page 10
Par Value Book Value
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Cash
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investment Portfolio -Treasury
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
0.00
3,757,823,518.50 3,946,986,404.12 2.355 337
0Average Balance
3,844,988,932.29 3,934,504,874.78Total Cash and Investments
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_001: 10/12/2022 13:17
Run Date: 10/12/2022 - 13:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 15
SECTION III
APPENDIX
B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL –
MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED
PARTIES
B.1. PFM
Notes:
1. Statements are generated by the SymPro Treasury Management Software system beginning first
quarter of calendar year 2022.
2. Market pricing data are obtained from Interactive Data Corporation/ICE.
YTM
365
Page 1
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Corporate Notes
1.480COOPERATIVE RABOBANK - CORP86583 325,000.00 324,244.44 01/10/20251.37501/12/2022 299,138.76 A+21688AAS1 832
3.899COOPERATIVE RABOBANK - CORP90303 255,000.00 254,889.05 08/22/20243.87508/22/2022 249,832.04 A+21688AAU6 691
3.046GOLDMAN SACHS GRP - CORP90066 175,000.00 174,886.65 03/15/20243.00003/15/2022 170,079.44 BBB+38141GZP2 531
3.752HSBC USA INC - CORP90186 550,000.00 549,981.88 05/24/20243.75005/24/2022 539,193.42 A-40428HTA0 601
4.000IBM - CORP90265 540,000.00 540,000.00 07/27/20254.00007/27/2022 528,672.54 A-459200KS9 1,030
0.727JOHN DEERE CAPITAL - CORP85658 150,000.00 149,969.67 07/05/20230.70006/04/2020 145,979.50 A24422EVH9 277
0.492JOHN DEERE CAPITAL - CORP86245 185,000.00 184,869.88 06/07/20240.45006/10/2021 172,594.58 A24422EVQ9 615
1.266JOHN DEERE CAPITAL - CORP86581 110,000.00 109,960.79 01/10/20251.25001/10/2022 101,963.00 A24422EVY2 832
3.408JOHN DEERE CAPITAL - CORP90200 170,000.00 169,965.06 06/06/20253.40006/06/2022 164,323.58 A24422EWF2 979
3.500NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BK - CORP90205 400,000.00 400,000.00 06/09/20253.50006/09/2022 385,704.72 AA-63254ABD9 982
0.847PACCAR FINANCIAL - CORP85665 100,000.00 99,968.21 06/08/20230.80006/08/2020 97,643.88 A+69371RQ82 250
0.394PACCAR FINANCIAL - CORP85724 55,000.00 54,979.32 08/11/20230.35008/11/2020 53,144.77 A+69371RQ90 314
0.518PACCAR FINANCIAL - CORP86307 105,000.00 104,964.93 08/09/20240.50008/09/2021 97,340.73 A+69371RR40 678
2.859PACCAR FINANCIAL - CORP90115 300,000.00 299,934.57 04/07/20252.85004/07/2022 286,848.10 A+69371RR73 919
0.452TOYOTA MCC - CORP86013 400,000.00 399,989.78 01/11/20240.45001/11/2021 379,577.04 A+89236THU2 467
0.441TOYOTA MCC - CORP86160 115,000.00 114,975.97 04/06/20230.40004/09/2021 112,665.50 A+89236TJD8 187
2.532TOYOTA MCC - CORP90080 100,000.00 99,954.27 03/22/20242.50003/22/2022 96,948.11 A+89236TJX4 538
3.925WALMART INC - CORP90321 285,000.00 284,804.56 09/09/20253.90009/09/2022 279,911.16 AA931142EW9 1,074
4,318,339.034,161,560.874,320,000.004,242,356.38Subtotal and Average 2.586 738
CD Medium Term
0.598CREDIT SUISSE NY - MT CD86122 595,000.00 595,000.00 03/17/20230.59003/23/2021 584,756.48 N/A22552G3C2 167
595,000.00584,756.48595,000.00595,000.00Subtotal and Average 0.598 167
CD Medium Term Yearly
4.157CREDIT AG NY - MT CD90302 550,000.00 550,000.00 08/16/20244.10008/19/2022 540,818.85 A+22536AZR8 685
550,000.00540,818.85550,000.00550,000.00Subtotal and Average 4.157 685
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
0.284FHLMC - AGENCY85751 1,500,000.00 1,499,543.68 08/24/20230.25008/21/2020 1,448,134.38 AA+3137EAEV7 327
0.261FHLMC - AGENCY85766 1,400,000.00 1,399,856.37 09/08/20230.25009/04/2020 1,347,326.12 AA+3137EAEW5 342
0.244FHLMC - AGENCY85767 1,065,000.00 1,065,060.46 09/08/20230.25009/04/2020 1,024,930.23 AA+3137EAEW5 342
0.250FHLMC - AGENCY85853 650,000.00 649,158.16 10/16/20230.12510/16/2020 622,123.96 AA+3137EAEY1 380
0.280FHLMC - AGENCY85884 2,120,000.00 2,119,302.81 11/06/20230.25011/05/2020 2,027,543.68 AA+3137EAEZ8 401
0.283FHLMC - AGENCY85950 1,625,000.00 1,624,369.91 12/04/20230.25012/04/2020 1,550,682.75 AA+3137EAFA2 429
0.322FNMA - AGENCY85849 1,600,000.00 1,599,111.33 07/10/20230.25007/10/2020 1,554,042.37 AA+3135G05G4 282
9,956,402.729,574,783.499,960,000.009,956,252.74Subtotal and Average 0.279 359
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.11
Page 16
YTM
365
Page 2
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Treasury Coupon Securities
0.225US TREASURY NOTES85945 1,130,000.00 1,130,319.27 11/15/20230.25012/03/2020 1,080,120.67 AA+91282CAW1 410
0.178US TREASURY NOTES86034 1,150,000.00 1,149,213.45 01/15/20240.12502/03/2021 1,090,164.35 AA+91282CBE0 471
0.272US TREASURY NOTES86090 1,725,000.00 1,721,520.20 02/15/20240.12503/03/2021 1,629,855.90 AA+91282CBM2 502
0.409US TREASURY NOTES86148 750,000.00 768,717.09 04/30/20242.00004/07/2021 723,603.75 AA+912828X70 577
0.350US TREASURY NOTES86190 775,000.00 775,298.76 04/15/20240.37504/29/2021 729,922.90 AA+91282CBV2 562
0.447US TREASURY NOTES86197 950,000.00 970,637.10 10/31/20241.50005/06/2021 898,603.10 AA+912828YM6 761
0.427US TREASURY NOTES86242 750,000.00 767,271.06 11/30/20241.50006/07/2021 707,783.25 AA+912828YV6 791
0.333US TREASURY NOTES86257 660,000.00 659,075.06 06/15/20240.25006/17/2021 616,558.80 AA+91282CCG4 623
0.476US TREASURY NOTES86260 1,575,000.00 1,568,986.90 06/15/20240.25006/21/2021 1,471,333.50 AA+91282CCG4 623
0.464US TREASURY NOTES86274 1,000,000.00 996,378.85 06/15/20240.25006/29/2021 934,180.00 AA+91282CCG4 623
0.467US TREASURY NOTES86275 1,000,000.00 996,333.86 06/15/20240.25006/29/2021 934,180.00 AA+91282CCG4 623
0.472US TREASURY NOTES86283 1,000,000.00 996,238.58 06/15/20240.25007/07/2021 934,180.00 AA+91282CCG4 623
0.379US TREASURY NOTES86306 475,000.00 474,966.06 07/15/20240.37508/09/2021 443,623.88 AA+91282CCL3 653
0.337US TREASURY NOTES86308 1,550,000.00 1,551,033.65 07/15/20240.37508/09/2021 1,447,614.75 AA+91282CCL3 653
0.438US TREASURY NOTES86326 700,000.00 699,214.22 07/15/20240.37508/12/2021 653,761.50 AA+91282CCL3 653
0.412US TREASURY NOTES86347 1,550,000.00 1,548,919.30 08/15/20240.37509/07/2021 1,442,408.30 AA+91282CCT6 684
0.510US TREASURY NOTES86379 775,000.00 772,966.33 09/15/20240.37510/06/2021 719,175.98 AA+91282CCX7 715
0.563US TREASURY NOTES86419 775,000.00 772,182.84 09/15/20240.37510/13/2021 719,175.98 AA+91282CCX7 715
0.642US TREASURY NOTES86422 775,000.00 774,731.75 10/15/20240.62510/18/2021 720,689.55 AA+91282CDB4 745
0.519US TREASURY NOTES86453 475,000.00 474,263.05 10/31/20230.37511/04/2021 455,480.35 AA+91282CDD0 395
0.794US TREASURY NOTES86454 775,000.00 772,358.95 10/15/20240.62511/04/2021 720,689.55 AA+91282CDB4 745
0.911US TREASURY NOTES86518 800,000.00 797,313.08 11/15/20240.75012/07/2021 743,562.40 AA+91282CDH1 776
0.987US TREASURY NOTES86568 1,000,000.00 1,000,290.72 12/15/20241.00012/28/2021 932,266.00 AA+91282CDN8 806
1.026US TREASURY NOTES86580 750,000.00 749,582.26 12/15/20241.00001/06/2022 699,199.50 AA+91282CDN8 806
1.823US TREASURY NOTES90012 1,150,000.00 1,141,461.56 02/15/20251.50002/15/2022 1,078,125.00 AA+91282CDZ1 868
2.132US TREASURY NOTES90076 800,000.00 792,775.85 03/15/20251.75003/18/2022 753,437.60 AA+91282CED9 896
2.658US TREASURY NOTES90107 275,000.00 259,550.24 04/30/20250.37504/06/2022 249,154.40 AA+912828ZL7 942
2.940US TREASURY NOTES90151 800,000.00 749,735.09 04/30/20250.37505/06/2022 724,861.71 AA+912828ZL7 942
3.000US TREASURY NOTES90153 1,250,000.00 1,246,651.76 04/30/20252.87505/05/2022 1,208,398.28 AA+9128284M9 942
2.858US TREASURY NOTES90201 2,200,000.00 2,197,643.96 05/15/20252.75006/06/2022 2,121,031.05 AA+91282CEQ0 957
2.921US TREASURY NOTES90241 750,000.00 750,639.05 06/15/20252.87507/11/2022 725,047.76 AA+91282CEU1 988
3.060US TREASURY NOTES90269 800,000.00 800,289.16 07/15/20253.00008/08/2022 774,940.42 AA+91282CEY3 1,018
3.544US TREASURY NOTES90316 1,400,000.00 1,386,854.47 08/18/20253.12509/07/2022 1,360,077.78 AA+91282CFE6 1,052
32,213,413.5330,443,207.9632,290,000.0032,555,399.11Subtotal and Average 1.155 733
Corporate Note Callables
1.8643M COMPANY - CORP85205 400,000.00 399,837.59 02/14/20231.75008/26/2019 396,589.65 A+88579YBL4 136
0.499AMAZON - CORP86222 560,000.00 559,560.16 05/12/20240.45005/12/2021 525,083.90 AA023135BW5 589
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 17
YTM
365
Page 3
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Corporate Note Callables
3.056AMAZON - CORP90132 145,000.00 144,805.31 04/13/20253.00004/13/2022 140,019.03 AA023135CE4 925
1.143AMERICAN EXPRESS - CORP86485 325,000.00 332,929.13 07/30/20242.50011/23/2021 311,355.56 BBB+025816CG2 668
1.143AMERICAN EXPRESS - CORP86486 100,000.00 102,439.73 07/30/20242.50011/23/2021 95,801.71 BBB+025816CG2 668
0.703ASTRAZENECA - CORP86235 365,000.00 364,981.84 05/28/20240.70005/28/2021 341,970.18 A-04636NAC7 605
1.620BANK OF AMERICA - CORP85804 325,000.00 333,677.96 03/05/20243.55009/28/2020 322,463.03 A-06051GHF9 521
0.810BANK OF AMERICA - CORP85855 250,000.00 250,000.00 10/24/20240.81010/21/2020 237,736.86 A-06051GJH3 754
1.530BANK OF AMERICA - CORP86513 500,000.00 500,000.00 12/06/20251.53012/06/2021 457,402.32 A-06051GKE8 1,162
0.872BANK OF NY MELLON - CORP86433 355,000.00 354,841.04 10/25/20240.85010/25/2021 327,936.70 A06406RAX5 755
3.355BANK OF NY MELLON - CORP90139 750,000.00 749,910.08 04/25/20253.35004/26/2022 724,476.45 A06406RBC0 937
0.537BRISTOL MYERS SQUI - CORP85916 375,000.00 375,000.00 11/13/20230.53711/13/2020 359,248.61 A+110122DT2 408
1.966CATERPILLAR FINL - CORP85444 200,000.00 199,995.78 11/18/20221.95001/13/2020 199,527.69 A14913Q3C1 48
0.646CATERPILLAR FINL - CORP86353 370,000.00 369,672.62 09/13/20240.60009/14/2021 342,627.14 A14913R2P1 713
0.958CATERPILLAR FINL - CORP86582 150,000.00 149,984.70 01/10/20240.95001/10/2022 143,685.81 A14913R2S5 466
1.141CHEVRON - CORP85636 185,000.00 185,000.00 05/11/20231.14105/11/2020 181,603.40 AA-166764BV1 222
3.458CINTAS CORP - CORP90150 160,000.00 159,969.63 05/01/20253.45005/03/2022 154,496.22 A-17252MAP5 943
1.678CITIBANK NA - CORP85643 250,000.00 250,000.00 05/15/20241.67805/14/2020 244,658.35 BBB+172967MR9 592
0.981CITIBANK NA - CORP86192 160,000.00 160,000.00 05/01/20250.98105/04/2021 148,280.99 BBB+172967MX6 943
2.014CITIGROUP INC - CORP86599 85,000.00 85,000.00 01/25/20262.01401/25/2022 78,119.50 BBB+17327CAN3 1,212
3.132COLGATE-PALMOLIVE - CORP90273 120,000.00 119,894.89 08/15/20253.10008/09/2022 115,925.80 AA+194162AM5 1,049
0.627GOLDMAN SACHS GRP - CORP85925 400,000.00 400,000.00 11/17/20230.62711/19/2020 397,587.36 BBB+38141GXL3 412
2.760HOME DEPOT - CORP90103 60,000.00 59,912.52 04/15/20252.70003/28/2022 57,240.24 A437076CM2 927
4.013HOME DEPOT - CORP90322 75,000.00 74,973.30 09/15/20254.00009/19/2022 73,819.05 A437076CR1 1,080
0.773AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE - CORP86351 255,000.00 254,892.93 08/09/20240.75009/09/2021 237,054.74 A-02665WDY4 678
1.527AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE - CORP86590 300,000.00 299,819.62 01/13/20251.50001/13/2022 278,422.39 A-02665WEA5 835
0.563JP MORGAN SECURITIES - CORP86067 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/16/20250.56302/16/2021 229,118.93 A-46647PBY1 869
0.653JP MORGAN SECURITIES - CORP86134 75,000.00 75,000.00 09/16/20240.65309/16/2020 71,538.17 A-46647PBS4 716
0.824JP MORGAN SECURITIES - CORP86236 190,000.00 190,000.00 06/01/20250.82406/01/2021 175,938.67 A-46647PCH7 974
2.595JP MORGAN SECURITIES - CORP90031 400,000.00 400,000.00 02/24/20252.59502/24/2022 371,962.32 A-46647PCV6 877
4.080JP MORGAN SECURITIES - CORP90140 225,000.00 225,000.00 04/26/20264.08004/26/2022 216,662.60 A-46647PCZ7 1,303
0.731MORGAN STANLEY - CORP86174 35,000.00 35,000.00 04/05/20240.73104/22/2021 34,157.66 BBB+61772BAA1 552
2.630MORGAN STANLEY - CORP90018 450,000.00 450,000.00 02/18/20262.63002/18/2022 419,311.17 BBB+61747YEM3 1,236
0.373NATIONAL RURAL - CORP86059 140,000.00 139,956.44 02/08/20240.35002/08/2021 132,054.32 A-63743HEU2 495
1.876NATIONAL RURAL - CORP90002 105,000.00 104,997.53 02/07/20251.87502/07/2022 98,286.83 A-63743HFC1 860
3.458NATIONAL RURAL - CORP90152 70,000.00 69,983.58 06/15/20253.45005/04/2022 67,541.38 A-63743HFE7 988
0.767CHARLES SCHWAB - CORP86114 245,000.00 244,940.22 03/18/20240.75003/18/2021 231,751.26 A808513BN4 534
1.746STATE STREET CORP - CORP86606 150,000.00 150,000.00 02/06/20261.74602/07/2022 139,731.00 A857477BR3 1,224
2.129STATE STREET CORP - CORP90001 75,000.00 76,928.34 03/30/20262.90102/07/2022 70,768.56 A857477BM4 1,276
2.383STATE STREET CORP - CORP90028 400,000.00 406,858.91 03/30/20262.90102/22/2022 377,432.32 A857477BM4 1,276
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 18
YTM
365
Page 4
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Corporate Note Callables
1.041TARGET CORP - CORP86498 250,000.00 260,585.62 07/01/20243.50011/29/2021 245,524.93 A87612EBD7 639
4.260TRUIST FINANCIAL - CORP90266 235,000.00 235,000.00 07/28/20264.26007/28/2022 228,582.54 A-89788MAH5 1,396
0.585UNITED HEALTH - CORP86229 260,000.00 259,853.24 05/15/20240.55005/19/2021 243,500.36 A+91324PEB4 592
0.418UNILEVER CAPITAL - CORP85770 100,000.00 99,959.35 09/14/20230.37509/14/2020 96,105.92 A+904764BJ5 348
0.626UNILEVER CAPITAL - CORP86325 125,000.00 125,000.00 08/12/20240.62608/12/2021 116,089.68 A+904764BN6 681
11,031,162.0610,459,191.3010,995,000.0011,001,930.31Subtotal and Average 1.624 769
Supranationals
0.511IADB - SUPRA85650 350,000.00 349,975.02 05/24/20230.50004/24/2020 342,013.00 AAA4581X0DM7 235
0.525IADB - SUPRA86365 755,000.00 754,631.67 09/23/20240.50009/23/2021 701,274.20 AAA4581X0DZ8 723
0.322IBRD - SUPRA85931 520,000.00 519,572.47 11/24/20230.25011/24/2020 496,321.51 AAA459058JM6 419
1,624,179.161,539,608.711,625,000.001,704,148.76Subtotal and Average 0.457 521
Pass Through Securities (GNMA/CMO)
0.280BMWLT - ABS86100 98,096.87 98,092.27 01/25/20240.29003/10/2021 97,034.77 AAA05591RAC8 481
1.929CARMAX - ABS85455 55,673.91 55,649.39 12/16/20241.89001/22/2020 55,120.78 AAA14315XAC2 807
0.627CARMAX - ABS85705 103,917.38 103,883.10 03/17/20250.62007/22/2020 101,960.45 AAA14315FAD9 898
0.509CARMAX - ABS85858 128,169.67 128,135.55 08/15/20250.50010/21/2020 124,993.96 AAA14316HAC6 1,049
0.348CARMAX - ABS86024 119,243.65 119,216.97 12/15/20250.34001/27/2021 115,408.13 AAA14316NAC3 1,171
0.529CARMAX - ABS86173 255,000.00 254,945.05 02/17/20260.52004/21/2021 246,560.16 AAA14314QAC8 1,235
0.557CARMAX - ABS86290 475,000.00 474,921.86 06/15/20260.55007/28/2021 452,225.27 AAA14317DAC4 1,353
3.522CARMAX - ABS90145 100,000.00 99,984.79 02/16/20273.49004/28/2022 97,554.18 AAA14317HAC5 1,599
0.347CAPITAL ONE - ABS86503 450,000.00 449,937.99 11/15/20261.04011/30/2021 417,217.55 AAA14041NFY2 1,506
2.820CAPITAL ONE - ABS90102 225,000.00 224,983.04 03/15/20272.80003/30/2022 215,415.45 AAA14041NFZ9 1,626
3.521CAPITAL ONE - ABS90210 195,000.00 194,968.84 05/15/20273.49006/14/2022 189,105.68 AAA14041NGA3 1,687
0.760COPAR - ABS86438 220,000.00 219,995.84 09/15/20260.77010/27/2021 206,961.33 AAA14044CAC6 1,445
0.580DISCOVER CARD ABS - ABS86368 280,000.00 279,940.05 09/15/20260.58009/27/2021 259,178.67 AAA254683CP8 1,445
3.510DISCOVER CARD ABS - ABS90274 205,000.00 204,974.56 07/15/20273.56008/09/2022 199,232.12 AAA254683CW3 1,748
1.929FHLMC - MBS85199 311,370.80 320,589.55 11/25/20222.51008/15/2019 310,667.32 AA+3137B1BS0 55
3.203FHMS - MBS84856 6,283.03 6,282.36 07/25/20233.20312/17/2018 6,124.73 AA+3137FKK39 297
2.093FHMS - MBS85379 2,473.38 2,466.18 07/25/20242.09211/26/2019 2,458.09 N/A3137FQ3V3 663
3.036FHMS - MBS90187 725,000.00 729,644.53 05/25/20253.32905/24/2022 701,860.90 N/A3137BKRJ1 967
2.907FHMS - MBS90193 734,106.05 735,081.03 08/25/20243.06405/31/2022 715,585.07 AA+3137FBTA4 694
3.478FHMS - MBS90248 733,801.69 724,973.13 01/25/20253.02307/18/2022 708,346.92 AA+3137BHXJ1 847
3.493FHMS - MBS90260 550,000.00 543,640.63 11/25/20253.15107/26/2022 527,109.66 N/A3137BMTX4 1,151
3.447FHMS - MBS90270 425,000.00 421,829.10 03/25/20253.20508/08/2022 410,952.56 N/A3137BJP64 906
3.330FHMS - MBS90272 575,000.00 568,374.02 12/25/20252.99508/09/2022 547,968.04 N/A3137BN6G4 1,181
3.512FHMS - MBS90275 325,000.00 322,638.67 09/25/20253.30808/10/2022 313,358.73 AA+3137BM7C4 1,090
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 19
YTM
365
Page 5
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Pass Through Securities (GNMA/CMO)
3.485FHMS - MBS90300 750,000.00 739,423.83 07/25/20253.01008/16/2022 718,888.80 AA+3137BLMZ8 1,028
3.758FHMS - MBS90315 500,000.00 493,462.01 10/25/20243.17109/02/2022 486,188.19 N/A3137BFE98 755
4.188FHMS - MBS90329 550,000.00 540,628.29 09/25/20243.24109/20/2022 537,471.46 AA+3137BEVH4 725
1.870FNMA - MBS85217 47,392.12 50,925.44 12/27/20222.28009/09/2019 47,229.97 N/A3136AEGQ4 87
1.299FORDO - ABS86601 100,000.00 99,988.12 06/15/20261.29001/24/2022 95,386.19 AAA345286AC2 1,353
0.457GMALT - ABS85802 16,248.19 16,236.69 08/21/20230.45009/29/2020 16,217.04 AAA362569AC9 324
0.258GMALT - ABS86078 141,698.82 141,684.31 02/20/20240.26002/24/2021 140,365.55 N/A36261RAC2 507
0.350GMALT - ABS86234 294,997.68 294,951.37 05/20/20240.34005/26/2021 290,517.55 AAA380144AC9 597
1.858GMCAR - ABS85448 37,058.29 37,049.56 09/16/20241.84001/15/2020 36,848.70 AAA36258NAC6 716
0.460GMCAR - ABS85744 148,514.41 148,457.21 04/16/20250.45008/19/2020 145,253.95 N/A362590AC5 928
0.682GMCAR - ABS86430 185,000.00 184,995.28 09/16/20260.68010/21/2021 174,346.33 N/A362554AC1 1,446
1.267GMCAR - ABS86592 170,000.00 169,985.23 11/16/20261.26001/19/2022 161,727.32 AAA380146AC4 1,507
3.668GMCAR - ABS90242 120,000.00 119,999.17 04/16/20273.64007/13/2022 117,393.08 N/A36265WAD5 1,658
0.892HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES - ABS86545 220,000.00 219,953.62 01/21/20260.88011/24/2021 208,144.77 N/A43815GAC3 1,208
0.377HAROT - ABS85801 82,432.28 82,413.92 10/18/20240.37009/29/2020 80,636.41 AAA43813KAC6 748
1.895HAROT - ABS90025 195,000.00 194,970.67 05/15/20261.88002/23/2022 185,309.63 AAA43815BAC4 1,322
0.488HART - ABS85704 68,969.06 68,940.98 12/16/20240.48007/22/2020 67,990.80 AAA44933FAC0 807
0.385HART - ABS86185 170,000.00 169,982.12 09/15/20250.38004/28/2021 164,350.15 AAA44933LAC7 1,080
2.232HART - ABS90067 420,000.00 419,983.83 10/15/20262.22003/16/2022 402,899.91 AAA448977AD0 1,475
1.879HDMOT - ABS85459 26,474.00 26,441.29 10/15/20241.87001/29/2020 26,376.86 AAA41284UAD6 745
0.738HYUNDAI AUTO - ABS86480 170,000.00 169,962.06 05/15/20260.74011/17/2021 160,419.04 AAA44935FAD6 1,322
0.553MBALT - ABS85682 116,817.93 116,798.41 02/18/20250.55006/23/2020 114,638.78 AAA58769VAC4 871
0.403MBALT - ABS85791 43,013.70 43,009.39 11/15/20230.40009/23/2020 42,789.74 AAA58769EAC2 410
0.551NAROT - ABS85690 104,323.15 104,314.93 07/15/20240.55006/30/2020 103,268.79 AAA65479CAD0 653
4.511NAROT - ABS90343 200,000.00 199,958.62 05/17/20274.46009/28/2022 199,252.44 AAA65480JAC4 1,689
0.699TOYOTA AUTO REC - ABS86475 225,000.00 224,995.21 04/15/20260.71011/15/2021 213,128.12 AAA89238JAC9 1,292
4.173TOYOTA AUTO REC - ABS90299 135,000.00 134,977.44 04/15/20273.76008/16/2022 132,352.87 AAA89231CAD9 1,657
1.024VOLKSWAGEN AUTO LOAN - ABS86533 295,000.00 294,988.44 06/22/20261.02012/13/2021 279,614.48 AAA92868KAC7 1,360
1.900VZOT - ABS85460 67,413.73 67,390.31 07/22/20241.85001/29/2020 67,054.30 AAA92348TAA2 660
0.479VZOT - ABS85723 241,982.83 241,925.08 02/20/20250.47008/12/2020 238,261.84 N/A92290BAA9 873
1.943VZOT - ABS86328 59,225.50 59,198.52 04/22/20241.94010/08/2019 59,087.18 AAA92348AAA3 569
0.633WOART - ABS85684 127,305.15 127,287.51 05/15/20250.63006/24/2020 124,898.88 AAA98163WAC0 957
0.817WOART - ABS86452 270,000.00 269,963.23 10/15/20260.81011/03/2021 255,837.74 AAA98163KAC6 1,475
13,560,390.5913,116,547.3813,597,003.2713,209,255.01Subtotal and Average 2.212 1,081
Municipal Bonds
0.349CA ST DEPT OF WTR - MUNI85715 120,000.00 120,000.00 12/01/20220.34908/06/2020 119,433.60 AAA13067WQZ8 61
0.414CA ST DEPT OF WTR - MUNI85716 55,000.00 55,000.00 12/01/20230.41408/06/2020 52,728.50 AAA13067WRA2 426
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 20
YTM
365
Page 6
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Municipal Bonds
1.258FLORIDA ST - MUNI85786 205,000.00 205,000.00 07/01/20251.25809/16/2020 185,596.75 AA341271AD6 1,004
0.444LOS ANGELES CCD - MUNI85909 145,000.00 145,000.00 08/01/20230.44411/10/2020 140,445.55 AA+54438CYH9 304
3.661MASS. CMNWLTH - MUNI90312 380,000.00 380,000.00 01/15/20253.66008/30/2022 371,898.40 N/A576004GY5 837
0.897NJ TPK AUTH - MUNI86035 165,000.00 165,000.00 01/01/20250.89702/04/2021 151,128.45 A+646140DN0 823
0.620NY ST URBAN DEV - MUNI85994 545,000.00 545,000.00 03/15/20230.62012/23/2020 517,183.20 AA+650036DS2 165
0.499SAN JUAN CA UNIF - MUNI85872 315,000.00 315,000.00 08/01/20230.49910/29/2020 305,887.05 N/A798306WM4 304
1,930,000.001,844,301.501,930,000.001,930,000.00Subtotal and Average 1.255 477
75,744,342.30 75,862,003.27 1.384 73672,264,776.54 75,778,887.09Total and Average
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 21
YTM
365
Page 7
Par Value Book Value
Stated
RateMarket Value
September 30, 2022
Portfolio Details - Cash
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
PFM
Days to
MaturityS&PCUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
0.00
75,744,342.30 75,862,003.27 1.384 736
0Average Balance
72,264,776.54 75,778,887.09Total Cash and Investments
Portfolio CCIP
ACData Updated: SET_02: 10/18/2022 13:52
Run Date: 10/18/2022 - 13:52 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
Page 22
SECTION III
APPENDIX
B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL –
MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED
PARTIES
B.2. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND
(LAIF)
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
.
CALIFORNIA STATE LOCAL STATE CONTROLLER ACCOUNT ESTIMATED
AGENCY INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT NUMBER BALANCE FAIR VALUE
ACALANES UNION HIGH SCHOOL 75-07-010 13,067,703.05 12,816,293.01
ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-005 893,969.96 876,770.84
BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-013 8,404,567.67 8,242,871.87
BYRON UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-017 179,091.96 175,646.40
CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-018 157,718.01 154,683.67
CCC REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 65-07-015 0.04 0.04
CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 75-07-001 678,688.11 665,630.80
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOL INSURANCE GROUP 35-07-001 2,414,805.92 2,368,347.38
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-001 43,000,000.00 42,172,721.37
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 75-07-007 1,387,145.20 1,360,457.86
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 99-07-000 75,000,000.00 73,557,072.15
CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 16-07-004 4,212,929.94 4,131,877.22
DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT 70-07-003 78,543.67 77,032.57
EAST CONTRA COSTA REG FEE & FINANCING AUTH 40-07-006 1,087,072.71 1,066,158.48
KENSINGTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-011 5,396,222.55 5,292,404.42
KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY 16-07-003 953,647.11 935,299.86
SERVICES DISTRICT
LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-012 1,781,041.63 1,746,776.10
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-011 21,050,868.15 20,645,869.70
MORAGA ORINDA FIRE DISTRICT 17-07-003 6,005,257.16 5,889,721.79
MORAGA SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-016 2,892.90 2,837.24
MT DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-008 3,706,709.10 3,635,395.58
MT VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-008 9,495,095.17 9,312,418.67
OAKLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-009 267,496.54 262,350.16
ORINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-015 3,340,204.66 3,275,942.34
PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-002 38,043.42 37,311.50
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 799 60-07-001 440,496.02 432,021.30
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800 60-07-003 3,811,099.69 3,737,777.80
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2026 60-07-005 7,880.09 7,728.48
-
RECLAMATION DISTRICT 2137 60-07-006 6,126.31 6,008.45
RODEO -HERCULES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-001 2,145,969.38 2,104,682.99
SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-004 259,192.42 254,205.81
W EST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-014 22,739,781.45 22,302,289.93
TOTAL 232,010,259.99 227,546,605.78
Page 23
SECTION III
APPENDIX
B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL –
MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED
PARTIES
ASSET MANAGEMENT FUNDS
B.3. ALLSPRING
B.4. CAMP
B.5. CalTRUST (LIQUIDITY)*
B.6. US BANK
*No investments were made in the CalTRUST Liquidity Fund during the quarter.
Allspring GAAP30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyInvestment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsThe information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to yourcustody statement for official portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custodystatement.Page 24
1 - 45 - 67 - 89 - 1011 - 1617 - 23Risk Summary (Contra Costa County)Performance Summary Gross of Fees (Contra Costa County) Performance Summary Net of Fees (Contra Costa County) GAAP FX Financials (Contra Costa County)Income Detail (Contra Costa County)Balance Sheet Classification (Contra Costa County) Table of Contents`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.*Additional informaiton will be provided upon request.Page 25
Balance SheetBook Value + Accrued44,113,427.72Net Unrealized Gain/Loss-441,330.99Market Value + Accrued43,672,096.73Portfolio CharacteristicsRisk MetricValueCash16,929.30MMFund1,801,276.43Fixed Income41,853,891.00Duration0.472Convexity0.006WAL0.536Years to Final Maturity 0.794Years to Effective Maturity 0.537Yield3.931Book Yield1.935Avg Credit RatingAA+/Aa1/AA+Issuer ConcentrationIssuer Concentration% of BaseMarket Value+ AccruedOther61.43%Federal Home Loan Banks13.60%Farm Credit System8.43%United States5.54%Zebra Intermediate II, LLC4.12%University of California2.30%Inter-American Development Bank2.29%Old Line Funding, LLC2.28%---100.00%Footnotes: 1,2Asset Class (%)Security Type (%)Market Sector (%)Risk SummaryUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 26
Credit RatingCredit Duration Heat MapRating 0 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5 - 7 7 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 30AAA 48.80% 9.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%AA 19.46% 2.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%A 14.92% 1.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BBB 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BB 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%B 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CCC 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CC 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%C 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%NA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Time To MaturityDurationRisk SummaryUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 27
Industry SectorIndustry GroupIndustry SubgroupMMF Asset AllocationCurrencyCountryRisk SummaryUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 28
1: * Grouped by: Issuer Concentration. 2: * Groups Sorted by: % of Base Market Value + Accrued.Risk SummaryUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 29
Gross of Fees (includes trading).PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal Return, Gross ofFeesWeighted AverageIndex ReturnExcess Total Return,Gross of FeesMonth to Date09/01/202209/30/2022-0.04%0.15%-0.19%Quarter to Date07/01/202209/30/20220.23%0.39%-0.16%Year to Date01/01/202209/30/2022-0.24%0.38%-0.62%Prior Month08/01/202208/31/20220.08%0.14%-0.07%Prior Quarter04/01/202206/30/2022-0.07%0.08%-0.15%Prior Year01/01/202112/31/20210.10%0.09%0.01%Trailing Month09/01/202209/30/2022-0.04%0.15%-0.19%Trailing Quarter07/01/202209/30/20220.23%0.39%-0.16%Trailing Year10/01/202109/30/2022-0.30%0.39%-0.69%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateContra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/01/198011/30/2004Contra Costa CountyICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index12/01/2004---Performance Summary Gross ofFeesUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 30
Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below, only available on historical data boundaries: Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin Date,End DateReturn Type,Fee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment01/01/200801/31/2011Book ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Gross ofFeesUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 31
Net of Fees (includes management and trading).PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal Return, Net ofFeesWeighted AverageIndex ReturnExcess Total Return,Net of FeesMonth to Date09/01/202209/30/2022-0.05%0.15%-0.20%Quarter to Date07/01/202209/30/20220.21%0.39%-0.19%Year to Date01/01/202209/30/2022-0.30%0.38%-0.68%Prior Month08/01/202208/31/20220.07%0.14%-0.07%Prior Quarter04/01/202206/30/2022-0.10%0.08%-0.17%Prior Year01/01/202112/31/20210.00%0.09%-0.08%Trailing Month09/01/202209/30/2022-0.05%0.15%-0.20%Trailing Quarter07/01/202209/30/20220.21%0.39%-0.19%Trailing Year10/01/202109/30/2022-0.39%0.39%-0.78%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateContra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/01/198011/30/2004Contra Costa CountyICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index12/01/2004---Performance Summary Net ofFeesUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 32
Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below, only available on historical data boundaries: Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin Date,End DateReturn Type,Fee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment01/01/200801/31/2011Book ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Net ofFeesUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 33
Balance SheetContra Costa CountyAs of:06/30/202209/30/2022Book Value43,945,755.0744,000,914.47Accrued Balance113,192.13112,513.26Book Value + Accrued44,058,947.2044,113,427.72Net FX Unrealized AccruedGain/Loss0.000.00Net FX Unrealized Carrying ValueSecurity Gain/Loss0.000.00Net Market Unrealized CarryingValue Gain/Loss-377,602.32-441,330.99Carrying Value and Accrued43,681,344.8843,672,096.73Income StatementContra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date07/01/202209/30/2022Net Amortization/Accretion Income18,661.28Interest Income145,211.24Dividend Income0.00Foreign Tax Withheld Expense0.00Misc Income0.00Net FX Allowance Expense0.00Net Market Allowance Expense0.00Income Subtotal145,211.24Net FX Realized Gain/Loss0.00Net Market Realized Gain/Loss0.01Net Total Holding Gain/Loss0.00Total Impairment Loss0.00Net Total Gain/Loss0.01Expense-10,383.05Net Income153,489.47Transfers In/Out-99,008.95Change in FX Unrealized Gain/Loss0.00Change in Market Unrealized Gain/Loss-63,728.67GAAP FX FinancialsUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 34
Statement of Cash FlowsContra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date07/01/202209/30/2022Net Income153,489.47Amortization/Accretion on MS-5,942.74Change in Accrued on MS18,549.14Net Gain/Loss on MS-0.01Change in Unrealized G/L on CE193.57Subtotal12,799.96Purchase of MS-9,209,274.25Purchased Accrued of MS-18,324.25Sales of MS2,025,625.22Sold Accrued of MS0.00Maturities of MS7,490,000.00Net Purchases/Sales288,026.72Transfers of Cash & CE-99,008.95Total Change in Cash & CE355,307.20Beginning Cash & CE3,760,384.14Ending Cash & CE4,115,691.34GAAP FX FinancialsUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 35
Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income94975P405ALLSPRING:GOVT MM I1,801,276.432.7009/30/202209/30/20220.00---7,901.800.000.000.007,901.80023135AJ5AMAZON.COM INC300,000.002.5011/29/202211/29/20220.0009/16/2022312.5081.610.000.00394.1003066RAB1AMCAR 2021-2 A2130,891.910.2611/12/202211/18/20240.0006/16/2021133.691.520.000.00135.2103065WAB1AMCAR 2022-2 A2A500,000.004.2006/12/202312/18/20250.0006/22/20225,250.005.250.000.005,255.25037833DL1APPLE INC0.001.7009/11/202209/11/20220.0008/02/2021991.67-892.800.000.0098.87037833AK6APPLE INC300,000.002.4005/03/202305/03/20230.0001/21/20221,800.00-1,172.560.000.00627.4404821UJ86Atlantic Asset Securitization Corp.0.000.0009/08/202209/08/20220.0005/10/20220.003,680.000.000.003,680.0006051GJX8BANK OF AMERICA CORP500,000.003.3405/28/202405/28/20240.0005/28/20213,119.910.000.000.003,119.9106051GJX8BANK OF AMERICA CORP150,000.003.3405/28/202405/28/20240.0010/18/2021935.97-58.300.000.00877.6706406RAM9BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP650,000.001.8501/27/202301/27/20230.0003/26/20213,006.25-2,623.070.000.00383.1809247XAL5BLACKROCK INC500,000.003.5003/18/202403/18/20240.0005/27/20224,375.00-1,112.070.000.003,262.9305591RAC8BMWLT 2021-1 A3338,265.080.2901/24/202301/25/20240.0004/29/2022314.542,151.680.000.002,466.22130658QY6CALIFORNIA ST DEPT VET AFFAIRS HOME PUR REV1,000,000.000.2512/01/202212/01/20220.0008/12/2021635.000.000.000.00635.0014315NAC4CARMX 2019-1 A30.003.0509/15/202203/15/20240.0004/09/2021276.90-227.030.000.0049.8714317CAB8CARMX 2022-1 A2368,236.730.9103/09/202302/18/20250.0001/26/2022986.419.110.000.00995.52CCYUSDCash14,995.140.0009/30/202209/30/2022-99,008.95---0.000.000.00-10,383.05-10,383.0514913R2N6CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP700,000.002.5411/17/202211/17/20220.0005/21/20214,070.23-70.900.000.003,999.33161571HP2CHAIT 2020-1 A500,000.001.5301/13/202301/15/20230.0009/22/2022191.25264.440.000.00455.69808513AT2CHARLES SCHWAB CORP700,000.002.6501/25/202301/25/20230.0001/14/20224,637.50-3,628.800.000.001,008.70166756AG1CHEVRON USA INC0.001.5108/12/202208/12/20220.0008/12/2020704.600.000.000.00704.6017325FAS7CITIBANK NA600,000.003.6501/23/202401/23/20240.0008/25/20222,190.00-70.490.000.002,119.5114044CAB8COPAR 2021-1 A2703,174.450.3202/08/202302/18/20250.0008/23/2022254.062,017.600.000.002,271.66Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 36
Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income223047AA9COVINA CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.000.3008/01/202208/01/20220.0007/28/2021163.210.000.000.00163.21275282PP0EAST SIDE UN HIGH SCH DIST CALIF SANTA CLARACNTY0.000.4508/01/202208/01/20220.0010/29/2020188.750.000.000.00188.7530231GAR3EXXON MOBIL CORP390,000.002.7303/01/202303/01/20230.0002/17/20222,657.85-1,420.530.000.001,237.3230231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORP0.001.9008/16/202208/16/20220.0006/22/2022998.55347.760.000.001,346.31313313T32FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.000.0012/15/202212/15/20220.0002/02/20220.001,916.670.000.001,916.67313313H50FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP0.000.0009/28/202209/28/20220.0002/16/20220.002,126.110.000.002,126.113133EM4P4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP750,000.000.1504/14/202304/14/20230.0009/20/2021281.2562.350.000.00343.603133EMVP4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.000.1304/13/202304/13/20230.0004/26/2022312.504,825.820.000.005,138.32313313E38FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP0.000.0009/02/202209/02/20220.0008/01/20220.001,937.780.000.001,937.78313312GN4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.000.0006/06/202306/06/20230.0009/02/20220.002,742.920.000.002,742.923130A3KM5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.002.5012/09/202212/09/20220.0008/18/20213,125.00-2,967.580.000.00157.423130AQF57FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.000.6312/22/202312/22/20230.0012/22/2021781.25139.260.000.00920.51313385R32FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0011/29/202211/29/20220.0005/05/20220.003,807.780.000.003,807.78313384ET2003FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0004/23/202304/23/20230.0006/24/20220.007,179.170.000.007,179.17313385J64FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0010/07/202210/07/20220.0007/06/20220.004,833.340.000.004,833.34313385M60FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0010/31/202210/31/20220.0008/30/20220.002,391.110.000.002,391.113130A0XE5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.003.2503/08/202403/08/20240.0009/29/2022180.5657.530.000.00238.09341081GD3FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO600,000.002.6305/10/202305/10/20230.0005/10/20213,639.090.000.000.003,639.09345329AB2FORDL 2021-B A2182,756.680.2412/26/202204/15/20240.0009/24/2021139.660.710.000.00140.3734528LAB1FORDL 2022-A A2A169,569.242.7805/10/202310/15/20240.0004/26/20221,180.960.640.000.001,181.60380130AB0GMALT 2022-3 A2A410,000.004.0108/28/202310/21/20240.0008/17/20222,009.452.790.000.002,012.25Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 37
Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income36258NAC6GMCAR 2020-1 A3123,527.591.8412/19/202209/16/20240.0002/17/2021700.09-747.210.000.00-47.12380149AB0GMCAR 212 A246,180.960.2710/29/202206/17/20240.0010/04/202156.14-21.19-0.010.0034.9443815GAB5HAROT 2021-4 A2454,669.080.3902/01/202305/21/20240.0011/24/2021535.384.670.000.00540.0544934KAB0HART 2021-B A2209,022.580.2412/12/202205/15/20240.0007/28/2021165.278.350.000.00173.63419792F68HAWAII ST0.000.2508/01/202208/01/20220.0010/12/202161.750.000.000.0061.75427866AZ1HERSHEY CO600,000.003.3805/15/202305/15/20230.0002/11/20225,062.50-3,275.890.000.001,786.61438516BT2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC0.002.1508/08/202208/08/20220.0011/16/2021441.94-71.560.000.00370.394581X0DA3INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1,000,000.002.5001/18/202301/18/20230.0007/28/20216,250.00-5,864.790.000.00385.21459058JV6INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM0.000.1304/20/202304/20/20230.0005/26/20212.500.000.000.002.50459058GU1INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM0.002.1307/01/202207/01/20220.0011/24/20210.000.000.000.000.00459058JV6INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM500,000.000.1304/20/202304/20/20230.0005/26/2021155.9986.170.000.00242.1545950KCW8INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP700,000.003.0806/30/202306/30/20230.0006/30/20213,776.250.000.000.003,776.2547787NAC3JDOT 2020-B A3397,641.380.5103/24/202311/15/20240.0009/09/2021570.40-290.300.010.00280.1046625HJH4JPMORGAN CHASE & CO700,000.003.2001/25/202301/25/20230.0002/04/20225,600.00-4,025.450.000.001,574.554820P3JV6Jupiter Securitization Company LLC0.000.0009/29/202209/29/20220.0008/19/20220.002,676.390.000.002,676.3954438CYY2LOS ANGELES CALIF CMNTY COLLEGE DIST500,000.003.8002/01/202302/01/20230.0009/29/2022105.560.000.000.00105.5658769KAC8MBALT 2021-B A2129,398.920.2211/27/202201/16/20240.0006/29/202194.022.850.010.0096.8758769TAD7MBART 2019-1 A343,714.841.9411/05/202203/15/20240.0003/26/2021336.09-334.240.000.001.86612574EQ2MONTEREY PENINSULA CALIF CMNTY COLLEGEDIST0.001.2008/01/202308/01/20230.0008/25/2021700.00-537.580.000.00162.42612574EQ2MONTEREY PENINSULA CALIF CMNTY COLLEGEDIST700,000.001.2008/01/202308/01/20230.0008/25/20211,400.00-1,057.820.000.00342.18Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 38
Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income61746BDJ2MORGAN STANLEY600,000.003.7502/25/202302/25/20230.0005/24/20225,625.00-1,803.470.000.003,821.5365480DAC7NALT 2021-A A3355,000.000.5206/19/202308/15/20240.0003/04/2022461.491,011.650.000.001,473.1465480DAC7NALT 2021-A A3300,000.000.5206/19/202308/15/20240.0005/19/2022390.001,551.770.000.001,941.76630362EN7NAPA VY CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.000.3408/01/202308/01/20230.0008/17/2021113.330.000.000.00113.33630362EN7NAPA VY CALIF UNI SCH DIST400,000.000.3408/01/202308/01/20230.0008/17/2021226.670.000.000.00226.6765479HAC1NAROT 2019-B A327,796.322.5010/18/202211/15/20230.0012/07/2020359.70-376.170.000.00-16.4763743HEV0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVEFINANCE CORP500,000.002.9902/16/202302/16/20230.0006/08/20212,851.2739.450.000.002,890.7263743HEV0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVEFINANCE CORP250,000.002.9902/16/202302/16/20230.0006/25/20211,425.6419.900.000.001,445.5463763QGB7National Securities Clearing Corporation0.000.0007/11/202207/11/20220.0005/17/20220.00291.670.000.00291.67665859AN4NORTHERN TRUST CORP0.002.3808/02/202208/02/20220.0003/26/2021204.51-189.930.000.0014.5967066GAK0NVIDIA CORP600,000.000.3106/15/202306/15/20230.0006/16/2021463.500.000.000.00463.50675383TH6OCEANSIDE CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.000.3808/01/202308/01/20230.0008/17/202195.000.000.000.0095.00675383TH6OCEANSIDE CALIF UNI SCH DIST300,000.000.3808/01/202308/01/20230.0008/17/2021190.000.000.000.00190.00678858BW0OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO490,000.000.5505/26/202305/26/20230.0005/27/2021677.420.000.000.00677.4267983UKS1Old Line Funding, LLC1,000,000.000.0010/26/202210/26/20220.0009/13/20220.001,440.000.000.001,440.0069371RQ33PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.002.0009/26/202209/26/20220.0003/25/20212,833.33-2,464.790.000.00368.54735000TK7PORT OAKLAND CALIF REV800,000.000.8205/01/202305/01/20230.0003/31/20221,642.002,535.110.000.004,177.11CCYUSDReceivable1,934.160.0009/30/202209/30/20220.00---0.000.000.000.000.00757696AP4REDONDO BEACH CALIF CMNTY FING AUTH LEASEREV325,000.000.4105/01/202305/01/20230.0007/15/2021337.190.000.000.00337.1976913DFT9RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF INFRASTRUCTURE FINGAUTH LEAS750,000.000.4011/01/202211/01/20220.0010/19/2021746.250.000.000.00746.25Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 39
Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income797272RJ2SAN DIEGO CALIF CMNTY COLLEGE DIST0.000.5008/01/202208/01/20220.0012/28/2021103.540.000.000.00103.54797356DC3SAN DIEGO CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.000.2007/01/202207/01/20220.0010/21/20210.000.000.000.000.00797400MN5SAN DIEGO CNTY CALIF REGL TRANSN COMMNSALES TAX R300,000.005.0010/01/202210/01/20220.0003/23/20213,750.00-3,612.780.000.00137.22797686EK4SAN FRANCISCO CALIF MUN TRANSN AGY REV835,000.000.2503/01/202303/01/20230.0002/23/2021519.790.000.000.00519.79799381AA6SAN RAMON0.000.2807/01/202207/01/20220.0011/18/20210.000.000.000.000.00801747AB2SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT0.001.6408/01/202308/01/20230.0003/01/2022375.600.000.000.00375.60801747AA4SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT0.001.5408/01/202208/01/20220.0003/01/2022416.810.000.000.00416.81801747AB2SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT275,000.001.6408/01/202308/01/20230.0003/01/2022751.210.000.000.00751.2180285VAB5SDART 2021-4 A20.000.3709/15/202208/15/20240.0010/27/202131.621.45-0.010.0033.0780285VAC3SDART 2021-4 A3463,486.870.5112/30/202208/15/20250.0006/28/2022629.222,022.050.000.002,651.2789190GAB3TAOT 2021-B A2101,369.460.1411/09/202201/16/20240.0006/14/202152.170.910.010.0053.0989239KAC5TAOT 2022-A A3500,000.001.2303/30/202406/15/20260.0006/21/20221,537.501,867.760.000.003,405.2688602UHV5Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.000.0008/29/202208/29/20220.0007/08/20220.002,932.220.000.002,932.2289236THN8TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP600,000.002.5410/14/202210/14/20220.0004/20/20213,744.37-259.700.000.003,484.6686787EBC0TRUIST BANK600,000.003.2004/01/202404/01/20240.0005/19/20224,800.00-50.290.000.004,749.7191282CDV0UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.000.8801/31/202401/31/20240.0001/31/20222,199.32388.910.000.002,588.2491282CFA4UNITED STATES TREASURY500,000.003.0007/31/202407/31/20240.0008/10/20222,119.56185.940.000.002,305.5091282CEG2UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.002.2503/31/202403/31/20240.0008/30/20221,967.55997.410.000.002,964.9691324PDD1UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC700,000.002.3810/15/202210/15/20220.0012/01/20214,156.25-3,574.400.000.00581.8591412GWZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS1,000,000.002.9105/15/202305/15/20230.0007/11/20226,464.45197.010.000.006,661.4692512ML23Versailles Commercial Paper LLC1,000,000.000.0011/02/202211/02/20220.0007/22/20220.005,719.440.000.005,719.44Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 40
* Weighted by: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base Current Units,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income92646LG87Victory Receivables Corporation0.000.0007/08/202207/08/20220.0005/09/20220.00210.000.000.00210.0092826CAC6VISA INC300,000.002.8012/14/202212/14/20220.0012/21/20212,100.00-1,845.580.000.00254.4292868AAB1VWALT 2022-A A2610,000.003.0207/15/202310/21/20240.0006/14/20224,605.517.880.000.004,613.3992348AAA3VZOT 2019-C A1A76,147.071.9411/23/202204/22/20240.0003/25/2021564.19-634.420.000.00-70.2292348AAA3VZOT 2019-C A1A67,686.281.9411/23/202204/22/20240.0012/20/2021501.50-381.870.000.00119.6493114FGR9Walmart Inc.0.000.0007/25/202207/25/20220.0006/09/20220.00410.000.000.00410.0098162VAD1WOART 2019-B A3109,677.612.5910/21/202207/15/20240.0002/03/20221,419.50-867.070.000.00552.44------44,101,418.771.5704/14/202307/17/2023-99,008.95---145,211.2418,661.280.01-10,383.05153,489.47Income DetailUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 41
CESTIdentifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued94975P405ALLSPRING:GOVT MM I1,801,276.431.000009/30/20222.7009/30/2022 AAACash2.702.701,801,276.431,801,276.430.001,801,276.430.001,801,276.43CCYUSDReceivable1,934.161.000009/30/20220.0009/30/2022 AAACash0.000.001,934.161,934.160.001,934.160.001,934.16CCYUSDCash14,995.141.000009/30/20220.0009/30/2022 AAACash0.000.0014,995.1414,995.140.0014,995.140.0014,995.14023135AJ5AMAZON.COM INC300,000.0099.839011/29/20222.5011/29/2022 AAIndustrial3.143.46299,597.40299,679.01-162.01299,517.002,541.67302,058.67313385M60FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.768110/31/20220.0010/31/2022 A-1+Agency2.712.79995,367.22997,758.33-77.33997,681.000.00997,681.0067983UKS1Old Line Funding, LLC1,000,000.0099.774610/26/20220.0010/26/2022 A-1+Financial2.903.13996,560.00998,000.00-254.06997,745.940.00997,745.94------4,118,205.7356.141710/18/20221.3710/18/2022 AAA---2.772.874,109,730.354,113,643.07-493.404,113,149.672,541.674,115,691.34Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued46625HJH4JPMORGAN CHASE & CO700,000.0099.680201/25/20233.2001/25/2023 AA-Financial0.914.19715,533.00705,075.57-7,314.17697,761.404,106.67701,868.0761746BDJ2MORGAN STANLEY600,000.0099.717002/25/20233.7502/25/2023 A+Financial2.524.39605,430.00602,881.62-4,579.62598,302.002,250.00600,552.00037833AK6APPLE INC300,000.0098.907105/03/20232.4005/03/2023 AAAIndustrial0.844.29305,952.00302,727.47-6,006.17296,721.302,960.00299,681.3091412GWZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS1,000,000.0099.176005/15/20232.9105/15/2023 AAMunicipal3.004.19999,260.00999,457.01-7,697.01991,760.0010,989.561,002,749.563130A3KM5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.0099.817112/09/20222.5012/09/2022 AAAAgency0.143.43515,418.50502,225.68-3,140.18499,085.503,888.89502,974.39Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 42
Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued92826CAC6VISA INC300,000.0099.762012/14/20222.8012/14/2022 AA-Industrial0.353.94305,958.00300,260.79-974.79299,286.002,496.67301,782.6730231GAR3EXXON MOBIL CORP390,000.0099.524603/01/20232.7303/01/2023 AAIndustrial1.273.87394,910.10391,420.53-3,274.59388,145.94885.95389,031.8991324PDD1UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC700,000.0099.927010/15/20222.3810/15/2022 A+Industrial0.353.60712,355.00700,543.93-1,054.93699,489.007,665.97707,154.97808513AT2CHARLES SCHWAB CORP700,000.0099.623001/25/20232.6501/25/2023 AFinancial0.593.83713,608.00703,352.70-5,991.70697,361.003,400.83700,761.834581X0DA3INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1,000,000.0099.658001/18/20232.5001/18/2023 AAAGovernment0.163.631,034,360.001,006,948.50-10,368.50996,580.005,069.441,001,649.44313384ET2003FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0097.853404/23/20230.0004/23/2023 A-1+Agency2.863.87976,355.56984,080.97-5,546.97978,534.000.00978,534.00427866AZ1HERSHEY CO600,000.0099.363005/15/20233.3805/15/2023 A+Industrial1.204.41615,240.00606,979.07-10,801.07596,178.007,650.00603,828.0006406RAM9BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP650,000.0099.356601/27/20231.8501/27/2023 AA-Financial0.243.84668,447.00652,651.58-6,833.68645,817.902,137.78647,955.68161571HP2CHAIT 2020-1 A500,000.0099.378401/15/20231.5301/13/2023 AAAAsset Backed3.663.70496,621.09496,885.536.47496,892.00340.00497,232.0089236THN8TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP600,000.0099.985210/14/20222.5410/14/2022 A+Industrial2.413.72601,530.00600,036.70-125.50599,911.203,339.61603,250.81735000TK7PORT OAKLAND CALIF REV800,000.0097.857005/01/20230.8205/01/2023 A+Municipal2.104.50789,088.00794,158.22-11,302.22782,856.002,736.67785,592.67797686EK4SAN FRANCISCO CALIF MUN TRANSN AGY REV835,000.0098.441003/01/20230.2503/01/2023 AA-Municipal0.254.00835,000.00835,000.00-13,017.65821,982.35173.26822,155.6163743HEV0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVEFINANCE CORP500,000.0099.878002/16/20232.9902/16/2023 AFinancial3.024.32499,735.00499,940.83-550.83499,390.001,908.09501,298.0963743HEV0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVEFINANCE CORP250,000.0099.878002/16/20232.9902/16/2023 AFinancial3.024.32249,870.00249,970.15-275.15249,695.00954.04250,649.04797400MN5SAN DIEGO CNTY CALIF REGL TRANSN COMMNSALES TAX R300,000.00100.000010/01/20225.0010/01/2022 AAAMunicipal0.204.96321,873.00300,000.000.00300,000.007,500.00307,500.00Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 43
Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued3133EMVP4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.0097.905804/13/20230.1304/13/2023 AAAAgency2.074.12981,536.00989,823.82-10,765.82979,058.00583.33979,641.33459058JV6INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM500,000.0097.887304/20/20230.1304/20/2023 AAAGovernment0.194.01499,350.00499,811.74-10,375.24489,436.50281.75489,718.25341081GD3FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO600,000.0099.694805/10/20232.6305/10/2023 A+Utility2.654.76600,000.00600,000.00-1,831.20598,168.802,253.83600,422.6314913R2N6CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP700,000.0099.985911/17/20222.5411/17/2022 AIndustrial2.553.40700,420.00700,036.22-134.92699,901.302,225.30702,126.60678858BW0OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO490,000.0097.200005/26/20230.5505/26/2023 AUtility0.554.95490,000.00490,000.00-13,720.00476,280.00940.87477,220.8767066GAK0NVIDIA CORP600,000.0097.234706/15/20230.3106/15/2023 AIndustrial0.314.31600,000.00600,000.00-16,591.80583,408.20545.90583,954.1045950KCW8INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP700,000.0099.958506/30/20233.0806/30/2023 AAAGovernment3.114.26700,000.00700,000.00-290.50699,709.5059.89699,769.39757696AP4REDONDO BEACH CALIF CMNTY FING AUTHLEASE REV325,000.0097.635005/01/20230.4105/01/2023 AAMunicipal0.424.48325,000.00325,000.00-7,686.25317,313.75561.98317,875.73630362EN7NAPA VY CALIF UNI SCH DIST400,000.0096.812008/01/20230.3408/01/2023 AA-Municipal0.344.24400,000.00400,000.00-12,752.00387,248.00226.67387,474.67675383TH6OCEANSIDE CALIF UNI SCH DIST300,000.0096.680008/01/20230.3808/01/2023 AA-Municipal0.384.44300,000.00300,000.00-9,960.00290,040.00190.00290,230.00130658QY6CALIFORNIA ST DEPT VET AFFAIRS HOME PURREV1,000,000.0099.474012/01/20220.2512/01/2022 AAMunicipal0.253.431,000,000.001,000,000.00-5,260.00994,740.00846.67995,586.67612574EQ2MONTEREY PENINSULA CALIF CMNTY COLLEGEDIST700,000.0097.453008/01/20231.2008/01/2023 AAMunicipal0.294.31712,243.00705,271.77-23,100.77682,171.001,400.00683,571.003133EM4P4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP750,000.0097.973904/14/20230.1504/14/2023 AAAAgency0.183.99749,613.01749,867.84-15,063.59734,804.25521.88735,326.1376913DFT9RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF INFRASTRUCTURE FINGAUTH LEAS750,000.0099.746011/01/20220.4011/01/2022 AA-Municipal0.403.43750,000.00750,000.00-1,905.00748,095.001,243.75749,338.75313313T32FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.0099.301312/15/20220.0012/15/2022 A-1+Agency0.753.33993,416.67998,437.50-5,424.50993,013.000.00993,013.00Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 44
LTIdentifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued801747AB2SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSITDISTRICT275,000.0097.789008/01/20231.6408/01/2023 AAMunicipal1.644.33275,000.00275,000.00-6,080.25268,919.75751.21269,670.96313385R32FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.502511/29/20220.0011/29/2022 A-1+Agency1.503.05991,391.11997,558.06-2,533.06995,025.000.00995,025.00313385J64FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.966810/07/20220.0010/07/2022 A-1+Agency2.021.71994,833.33999,666.671.33999,668.000.00999,668.0092512ML23Versailles Commercial Paper LLC1,000,000.0099.710311/02/20220.0011/02/2022 A-1+Financial2.933.17991,702.78997,422.22-318.89997,103.330.00997,103.33313312GN4FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP1,000,000.0097.400506/06/20230.0006/06/2023 A-1+Agency3.483.91973,800.42976,543.34-2,538.34974,005.000.00974,005.0054438CYY2LOS ANGELES CALIF CMNTY COLLEGE DIST500,000.0099.977002/01/20233.8002/01/2023 AAAMunicipal3.803.88500,000.00500,000.00-115.00499,885.00105.56499,990.56------26,815,000.0098.999602/21/20231.4202/21/2023 AA---1.513.8526,884,850.5726,789,036.02-245,294.0526,543,741.9783,191.9926,626,933.96Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued09247XAL5BLACKROCK INC500,000.0098.563003/18/20243.5003/18/2024 AA-Financial2.594.52507,990.00506,454.86-13,639.86492,815.00631.94493,446.943130A0XE5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0098.450703/08/20243.2503/08/2024 AAAAgency4.344.37984,870.00984,927.53-420.53984,507.002,076.39986,583.3917325FAS7CITIBANK NA600,000.0098.629001/23/20243.6501/23/2024 AA-Financial3.534.73600,924.00600,853.51-9,079.51591,774.004,136.67595,910.6786787EBC0TRUIST BANK600,000.0097.625004/01/20243.2004/01/2024 A+Financial3.174.86600,356.40600,282.61-14,532.61585,750.009,600.00595,350.0098162VAD1WOART 2019-B A3109,677.6199.950407/15/20242.5910/21/2022 AAAAsset Backed1.243.47110,345.96109,783.14-159.98109,623.15126.25109,749.4065479HAC1NAROT 2019-B A327,796.3299.960811/15/20232.5010/18/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.673.2728,364.1927,832.42-46.9827,785.4430.8827,816.33Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 45
Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued58769TAD7MBART 2019-1 A343,714.8499.836303/15/20241.9411/05/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.473.5644,329.5843,788.14-144.8743,643.2737.6943,680.9692348AAA3VZOT 2019-C A1A76,147.0799.771304/22/20241.9411/23/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.123.4977,509.3876,424.61-451.6675,972.9545.1476,018.0992348AAA3VZOT 2019-C A1A67,686.2899.771304/22/20241.9411/23/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.713.4968,188.6467,853.34-321.8367,531.5240.1267,571.6436258NAC6GMCAR 2020-1 A3123,527.5999.438009/16/20241.8412/19/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.234.51125,771.35124,209.44-1,376.06122,833.3894.70122,928.0847787NAC3JDOT 2020-B A3397,641.3898.038411/15/20240.5103/24/2023 AAAAsset Backed0.224.72398,775.28398,244.67-8,403.46389,841.2190.13389,931.3405591RAC8BMWLT 2021-1 A3338,265.0898.914401/25/20240.2901/24/2023 AAAAsset Backed2.343.70334,816.36336,297.11-1,704.34334,592.7716.35334,609.12380149AB0GMCAR 212 A246,180.9699.741206/17/20240.2710/29/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.163.4946,206.2146,185.34-123.9046,061.445.2046,066.6306051GJX8BANK OF AMERICA CORP500,000.0098.005005/28/20243.3405/28/2024 AA-Financial3.416.22500,000.00500,000.00-9,975.00490,025.001,531.91491,556.9106051GJX8BANK OF AMERICA CORP150,000.0098.005005/28/20243.3405/28/2024 AA-Financial3.226.22150,372.00150,151.46-3,143.96147,007.50459.57147,467.0789190GAB3TAOT 2021-B A2101,369.4699.624501/16/20240.1411/09/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.143.56101,367.59101,369.12-380.28100,988.846.31100,995.1403066RAB1AMCAR 2021-2 A2130,891.9199.614811/18/20240.2611/12/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.393.53130,887.26130,891.25-503.59130,387.6612.29130,399.9558769KAC8MBALT 2021-B A2129,398.9299.324201/16/20240.2211/27/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.234.51129,388.07129,396.88-872.46128,524.4212.65128,537.0844934KAB0HART 2021-B A2209,022.5899.354205/15/20240.2412/12/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.433.59209,003.63209,017.33-1,344.63207,672.7022.30207,694.99345329AB2FORDL 2021-B A2182,756.6899.262104/15/20240.2412/26/2022 AAAAsset Backed0.243.38182,754.98182,756.30-1,348.18181,408.1119.49181,427.6180285VAC3SDART 2021-4 A3463,486.8799.321808/15/20250.5112/30/2022 AAAAsset Backed3.363.31458,381.27460,048.05295.36460,343.41105.06460,448.46Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 46
Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued14044CAB8COPAR 2021-1 A2703,174.4598.730702/18/20250.3202/08/2023 AAAAsset Backed3.013.96694,384.77695,344.99-1,095.86694,249.13100.01694,349.1465480DAC7NALT 2021-A A3355,000.0097.025608/15/20240.5206/19/2023 AAAAsset Backed1.984.81349,536.33351,594.96-7,154.15344,440.8182.04344,522.8565480DAC7NALT 2021-A A3300,000.0097.025608/15/20240.5206/19/2023 AAAAsset Backed3.394.81292,242.19294,406.04-3,329.30291,076.7469.33291,146.0743815GAB5HAROT 2021-4 A2454,669.0898.643605/21/20240.3902/01/2023 AAAAsset Backed0.394.50454,657.16454,663.62-6,161.58448,502.0449.26448,551.293130AQF57FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.0095.549412/22/20230.6312/22/2023 AAAAgency0.744.39498,895.00499,323.38-21,576.38477,747.00859.38478,606.3814317CAB8CARMX 2022-1 A2368,236.7398.767702/18/20250.9103/09/2023 AAAAsset Backed0.923.75368,215.81368,224.50-4,525.63363,698.87148.93363,847.8191282CDV0UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.0095.535201/31/20240.8801/31/2024 AAAGovernment1.034.36996,914.06997,941.30-42,589.30955,352.001,474.18956,826.1889239KAC5TAOT 2022-A A3500,000.0094.816106/15/20261.2303/30/2024 AAAAsset Backed3.694.88477,871.09479,941.87-5,861.57474,080.30273.33474,353.6391282CEG2UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.0097.000003/31/20242.2503/31/2024 AAAGovernment3.434.34981,953.13982,950.54-12,950.54970,000.0061.81970,061.8134528LAB1FORDL 2022-A A2A169,569.2499.099010/15/20242.7805/10/2023 AAAAsset Backed2.804.32169,566.09169,567.14-1,525.66168,041.47209.51168,250.9992868AAB1VWALT 2022-A A2610,000.0098.700510/21/20243.0207/15/2023 AAAAsset Backed3.054.75609,952.54609,961.88-7,888.89602,072.99562.89602,635.8803065WAB1AMCAR 2022-2 A2A500,000.0099.536912/18/20254.2006/12/2023 AAAAsset Backed4.254.93499,962.15499,967.89-2,283.19497,684.70758.33498,443.0391282CFA4UNITED STATES TREASURY500,000.0097.773407/31/20243.0007/31/2024 AAAGovernment3.274.27497,421.88497,607.82-8,740.82488,867.002,527.17491,394.17380130AB0GMALT 2022-3 A2A410,000.0099.461010/21/20244.0108/28/2023 AAAAsset Backed4.054.66409,969.58409,972.37-2,182.36407,790.02502.36408,292.38------13,168,213.0498.001908/07/20241.9509/25/2023 AA+---2.544.4413,092,143.9513,098,235.38-195,543.5412,902,691.8326,779.6012,929,471.43Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 47
Summary* Grouped by: BS Class 2. * Groups Sorted by: BS Class 2. * Weighted by: Base Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinal Maturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net Total UnrealizedGain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued------44,101,418.7794.665307/17/20231.5704/14/2023 AA+---1.933.9344,086,724.8744,000,914.47-441,330.9943,559,583.47112,513.2643,672,096.73Balance Sheet ClassificationUS Dollar01 July 2022 to 30 September 2022Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Investment Strategy: Global Liquidity SolutionsPrimary Benchmark: ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings andtransactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Page 48
For the Month Ending July 31, 2022Account Statement - Transaction Summary
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Opening Market Value
Purchases
Redemptions
Change in Value
Closing Market Value
292,437,475.90
407,317.39
0.00
0.00
$292,844,793.29
CAMP Pool
Unsettled Trades 0.00
407,317.39 Cash Dividends and Income
July 31, 2022 June 30, 2022
Asset Summary
CAMP Pool 292,844,793.29 292,437,475.90
$292,844,793.29 $292,437,475.90 Total
Asset Allocation
100.00%
CAMP Pool
Account 4017-001 Page 1
Page 49
For the Month Ending July 31, 2022Account Statement
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Total Settlement Dollar AmountShare or Trade
Shares OwnedDate Transaction Description of TransactionUnit PriceDate
CAMP Pool
292,437,475.90 Opening Balance
07/29/22 08/01/22 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment - Distributions 1.00 407,317.39 292,844,793.29
292,844,793.29
292,844,793.29
292,844,793.29
292,476,893.71
1,104,933.38
0.00
(375,000,000.00)
306,104,933.38
361,739,859.91
407,317.39
292,844,793.29
0.00
0.00
407,317.39
292,437,475.90
Monthly Distribution Yield
Average Monthly Balance
Closing Balance
Fiscal YTDMonth of
Cash Dividends and Income
Closing Balance
Check Disbursements
Redemptions (Excl. Checks)
Purchases
Opening Balance
Closing Balance
July January-July
1.64%
Account 4017-001 Page 2
Page 50
For the Month Ending August 31, 2022Account Statement - Transaction Summary
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Opening Market Value
Purchases
Redemptions
Change in Value
Closing Market Value
292,844,793.29
446,559.16
(90,000,000.00)
0.00
$203,291,352.45
CAMP Pool
Unsettled Trades 0.00
446,559.16 Cash Dividends and Income
August 31, 2022 July 31, 2022
Asset Summary
CAMP Pool 203,291,352.45 292,844,793.29
$203,291,352.45 $292,844,793.29 Total
Asset Allocation
100.00%
CAMP Pool
Account 4017-001 Page 1
Page 51
For the Month Ending August 31, 2022Account Statement
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Total Settlement Dollar AmountShare or Trade
Shares OwnedDate Transaction Description of TransactionUnit PriceDate
CAMP Pool
292,844,793.29 Opening Balance
08/09/22 08/09/22 Redemption - Outgoing Wires 1.00 (30,000,000.00) 262,844,793.29
08/10/22 08/10/22 Redemption - Outgoing Wires 1.00 (30,000,000.00) 232,844,793.29
08/12/22 08/12/22 Redemption - Outgoing Wires 1.00 (30,000,000.00) 202,844,793.29
08/31/22 09/01/22 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment - Distributions 1.00 446,559.16 203,291,352.45
203,291,352.45
203,291,352.45
203,291,352.45
229,955,972.62
1,551,492.54
0.00
(465,000,000.00)
306,551,492.54
361,739,859.91
446,559.16
203,291,352.45
0.00
(90,000,000.00)
446,559.16
292,844,793.29
Monthly Distribution Yield
Average Monthly Balance
Closing Balance
Fiscal YTDMonth of
Cash Dividends and Income
Closing Balance
Check Disbursements
Redemptions (Excl. Checks)
Purchases
Opening Balance
Closing Balance
August January-August
2.30%
Account 4017-001 Page 2
Page 52
For the Month Ending September 30, 2022Account Statement - Transaction Summary
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Opening Market Value
Purchases
Redemptions
Change in Value
Closing Market Value
203,291,352.45
40,389,113.82
(60,000,000.00)
0.00
$183,680,466.27
CAMP Pool
Unsettled Trades 0.00
389,113.82 Cash Dividends and Income
September 30, 2022 August 31, 2022
Asset Summary
CAMP Pool 183,680,466.27 203,291,352.45
$183,680,466.27 $203,291,352.45 Total
Asset Allocation
100.00%
CAMP Pool
Account 4017-001 Page 1
Page 53
For the Month Ending September 30, 2022Account Statement
Contra Costa County - Liquidity Fund - 4017-001
Total Settlement Dollar AmountShare or Trade
Shares OwnedDate Transaction Description of TransactionUnit PriceDate
CAMP Pool
203,291,352.45 Opening Balance
09/09/22 09/09/22 Redemption - Outgoing Wires 1.00 (40,000,000.00) 163,291,352.45
09/15/22 09/15/22 Purchase - Incoming Wires 1.00 10,000,000.00 173,291,352.45
09/16/22 09/16/22 Purchase - Incoming Wires 1.00 20,000,000.00 193,291,352.45
09/19/22 09/19/22 Redemption - Outgoing Wires 1.00 (20,000,000.00) 173,291,352.45
09/30/22 09/30/22 Purchase - Incoming Wires 1.00 10,000,000.00 183,291,352.45
09/30/22 10/03/22 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment - Distributions 1.00 389,113.82 183,680,466.27
183,680,466.27
183,680,466.27
183,680,466.27
181,637,656.24
1,940,606.36
0.00
(525,000,000.00)
346,940,606.36
361,739,859.91
389,113.82
183,680,466.27
0.00
(60,000,000.00)
40,389,113.82
203,291,352.45
Monthly Distribution Yield
Average Monthly Balance
Closing Balance
Fiscal YTDMonth of
Cash Dividends and Income
Closing Balance
Check Disbursements
Redemptions (Excl. Checks)
Purchases
Opening Balance
Closing Balance
September January-September
2.61%
Account 4017-001 Page 2
Page 54
W CONTRA COSTA HCD 2019 DEPOSIT AC (229842000)
Begin Date : 07/01/2022 End Date : 09/30/2022
Account Information
Account Number Account Name
229842000 WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2019
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
Ending Balance Last Accounting Period 30-Jun-22 $-
Receipts For This Period
Cash Dividends 14,059.85
Interest On Bonds -
From Other Sources -14,059.85
Disbursements For This Period
Purchases -
For Other Purposes -14,059.85 -14,059.85
Ending Balance This Accounting Period 30-Sep-22 $-
Summary of Income Cash
Ending Balance Last Accounting Period 30-Jun-22 $-
Receipts For This Period
Sales and Maturities 600,000.00
From Other Sources 2,856,837.10 3,456,837.10
Disbursements For This Period
Purchases -2,856,837.10
For Other Purposes -600,000.00 -3,456,837.10
Ending Balance This Accounting Period 30-Sep-22 $-
Ending Balance Last Accounting Period 30-Jun-22 $3,588,257.84
Assets Purchased or Otherwise Acquired 2,856,837.10
Assets Sold or Otherwise Disposed of -600,000.00
Ending Balance This Accounting Period 30-Sep-22 $5,845,094.94
Market Value of Account $5,845,094.94
Summary of Principal Cash
Summary of Investments
BOOK VALUE - TRANSACTIONS Run Date : 10/20/2022 Page 1 of 4
Page 55
W CONTRA COSTA HCD 2019 DEPOSIT AC (229842000)
Begin Date : 07/01/2022 End Date : 09/30/2022
Account Information
Account Number Account Name
229842000 WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2019
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
Schedule of Transactions - By Entry Date
Transactions
Income
Cash
Principal
Cash
Principal
Investments
Invested
Income
Ending Balance Last Statement
Period 30-Jun-22
$--3,588,257.84 -
01-Jul-22
PURCHASED SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE
2,842,777.25 SHARES AT 1.00 USD
--2,842,777.25 2,842,777.25 -
DIVIDEND EARNED ON FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE SHARE
ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 6/30/2022 DIVIDEND FROM 6/1/22 TO
6/30/22
1,910.19 ---
CASH RECEIPT RECEIPT OF FUNDS FED REF# 1317 -2,842,777.25 --
05-Jul-22
PURCHASED SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE
1,910.19 SHARES AT 1.00 USD
--1,910.19 1,910.19 -
CASH DISBURSEMENT TRANSFER TO PRINCIPAL -1,910.19 ---
CASH RECEIPT TRANSFER FROM INCOME -1,910.19 --
02-Aug-22
PURCHASED SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE
3,832.74 SHARES AT 1.00 USD
--3,832.74 3,832.74 -
CASH DISBURSEMENT TRANSFER TO PRINCIPAL -3,832.74 ---
CASH RECEIPT TRANSFER FROM INCOME -3,832.74 --
02-Sep-22
PURCHASED SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE
8,316.92 SHARES AT 1.00 USD
--8,316.92 8,316.92 -
CASH DISBURSEMENT TRANSFER TO PRINCIPAL -8,316.92 ---
CASH RECEIPT TRANSFER FROM INCOME -8,316.92 --
BOOK VALUE - TRANSACTIONS Run Date : 10/20/2022 Page 2 of 4
Page 56
W CONTRA COSTA HCD 2019 DEPOSIT AC (229842000)
Begin Date : 07/01/2022 End Date : 09/30/2022
Account Information
Account Number Account Name
229842000 WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2019
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
Schedule of Transactions - By Entry Date
Transactions
Income
Cash
Principal
Cash
Principal
Investments
Invested
Income
03-Aug-22
SOLD SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE 100,000
SHARES AT 1.00 USD
-100,000.00 -100,000.00 -
CASH DISBURSEMENT PAID TO W CONTRA COSTA HLTH CARE DIST
WIRE TRANSFER WIRE TO WELLS FARGO BANK
--100,000.00 --
31-Aug-22
SOLD SHARES OF FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE 500,000
SHARES AT 1.00 USD
-500,000.00 -500,000.00 -
CASH DISBURSEMENT PAID TO W CONTRA COSTA HLTH CARE DIST
WIRE TRANSFER WIRE TO WELLS FARGO BANK
--500,000.00 --
01-Aug-22
DIVIDEND EARNED ON FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE SHARE
ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 7/31/2022 DIVIDEND FROM 7/1/22 TO
7/31/22
3,832.74 ---
01-Sep-22
DIVIDEND EARNED ON FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE SHARE
ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 8/31/2022 DIVIDEND FROM 8/1/22 TO
8/31/22
8,316.92 ---
Ending Balance This Statement
Period 30-Sep-22
$--5,845,094.94 -
BOOK VALUE - TRANSACTIONS Run Date : 10/20/2022 Page 3 of 4
Page 57
W CONTRA COSTA HCD 2019 DEPOSIT AC (229842000)
Begin Date : 07/01/2022 End Date : 09/30/2022
Account Information
Account Number Account Name
229842000 WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2019
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT
Schedule of Assets as of September 30, 2022
Cusip Asset Name Shares Book Value Market Value Est Income Yield
CASH
Income Cash ----
Principal Cash ----
CASH Total ----
MUTUAL FUNDS/MONEY MARKETS
60934N666 FEDERATED INSTITUTIONAL TAX FREE CASH TRUST
PREMIER SHARES #73
5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 139,677.60 2.39
MUTUAL FUNDS/MONEY MARKETS Total 5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 139,677.60 2.39
229842000 Total 5,845,094.94 5,845,094.94 139,677.60 2.39
BOOK VALUE - TRANSACTIONS Run Date : 10/20/2022 Page 4 of 4
Page 58
SECTION III
APPENDIX
B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL –
MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED
PARTIES
B. 7. EAST BAY REGIONAL
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY
(EBRCS)
EBRCS TRANSACTIONS*
as of
September 30, 2022
FY 2022-2023
FUND BALANCE @ TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date BALANCE @
NUMBER 07/01/22 09/30/22
100300 1,059,410.99 1,059,410.99
TOTALS 1,059,410.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,059,410.99
* East Bay Regional Communications System Authority
Page 59
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the Employment and Human Services Department's amended Services Awards Policy, effective December 1, 2022, and
AUTHORIZE the expenditure of up to $15,000 annually for recognizing and appreciating public service.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total annual expenditures not to exceed $15,000, all of which has been budgeted in FY 2022-23. Funding ratios are 59% Federal, 35% State and
6% County.
BACKGROUND:
On December 18, 2018, the Board approved the Department's Years of Service awards Policy to recognize employees who have achieved 10,
15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 years of service and increased the annual budget from $1,400 to $2,400 due to the large number of employees recognized
each year (estimated up to 1,175 employees).
The Employment and Human Services Department vacancy rate has increased from 11% in October 2020 to 16% in October 2022. High
vacancy rates impede the Departments ability to meet customer service mandates (e.g. processing times for public assistance benefits), weaken
the quality of customer service (less time is available per customer), reduce employee morale, and can lead to employees seeking employment
elsewhere. Employee morale and engagement is critical for retention and excellent customer service. One mechanism to improve employee
morale, engagement and retention is regular employee recognition including but not limited to annual years of service awards.
The Department engages in a number of activities to improve morale and engagement and retention through communication and recognition.
These include but are not limited to:
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: 925-608-4801
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.50
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Employment & Human Services Department Service Awards Policy and Annual Expenditure Authorization
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Annual Service Recognition Awards for years of service.
Proclamations by the Board of Supervisors that recognize and appreciate EHSD functions (e.g. Adoptions
Month).
EHSD Live!, -- a regular live all-staff meeting that shares information, recognizes accomplishments, and
provides an opportunity for Q&A with the Director and guests.
Monthly Headlines, the Department newsletter filled with information and recognitions.
Celebrations for professional months (e.g. Social Worker Month, Eligibility Worker Month, Administrative
Professionals Month)
Bureau, Unit, and Division level staff appreciation parties (personally funded by executives, managers, and
supervisors)
In addition to the existing January Years of Service Award (not to exceed an annual maximum of $3,000 with an approximate cost per
employee that varies depending on the number of employees honored), the revised Department Employee Service Awards policy adds two
additional annual appreciations in December and May. It adds an appreciation through a signed winter holiday card to all staff (not to
exceed $5,000 for approximately $2.50 per employee with approximately 2,000 FTE.). And it adds a token of appreciation in May during
Public Service Appreciation Week (not exceed $7,000 for approximately $3.50 per employee with approximately 2,000 FTE). In addition to
the tokens of appreciation, the Department, Bureaus, and buildings may host celebration events at no additional cost to the county.
The total annual budget will not exceed $15,000 (approximately $7.50 per employee with approximately 2,000 FTE). As a comparison, the
Solano County Board Approved employee recognition policy authorizes Departments to spend up to $25.00 per employee.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Department will have one less tool to influence employee morale and engagement. Vacancy rates could continue to grow possibly
resulting in negative impacts on the timeliness, quality, and accuracy of services.
ATTACHMENTS
EHSD Service Awards Policy
REPLACES:
SECTION:
PAGE NO.: 1
ISSUED/REVISED:
SERVICE AWARDS POLICY
SECTION: 23-903
PAGE NO.: 1
EFFECTIVE: 12/1/2022
DMCL # 15-34
Contra Costa County Issued/Revised: 12/1/2022
Employment & Human Services Dept. Manual Distribution: 1, 2A
I. GENERAL
The purpose of this section is to establish policy and procedures to recognize and celebrate
Employment and Human Services (EHSD) staff members for their years of dedicated service, and to
bestow Years of Service awards. In addition, it is to recognize and appreciate all employees for their
public service to Contra Costa County throughout each year. The annual budget will not exceed
$15,000 (approximately $7.50 per employee with approximately 2,000 FTE).
The purpose of these employee public service appreciations is to promote morale, engagement, and
retention.
II. POLICY
The Service Awards policy consists of three annual recognition activities in January, May, and
December, as follows:
A. In January, the department will hold the Years of Service event to celebrate employees who
reach a “years of service” milestone (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 years) during the previous calendar
year. The event location may vary, with every attempt for the site to be convenient to a majority of
employees. Invited guests to the January event will include:
1. Staff celebrating years of service
2. Their immediate supervisors
3. Their Division Managers
4. All Bureau Directors
5. Department Director
6. Other staff, friends, and family may also attend (with RSVP).
The Community Relations Unit will coordinate the Years of Service recognition event during which
honorees will receive a Years of Service certificate and/or award. Attendance is not mandatory;
Community Relations will ensure non-attendees receive their Years of Service award and a copy of
the recognition event program following the event.
As part of this policy, there will be a proclamation at the Board of Supervisors (BOS) meeting for
staff celebrating 20 years or more of service, at the discretion of the Bureau Directors and the
employee.
REPLACES:
SECTION:
PAGE NO.: 1
ISSUED/REVISED:
SERVICE AWARDS POLICY
SECTION: 23-903
PAGE NO.: 2
EFFECTIVE: 12/1/2022
DMCL # 15-34
Contra Costa County Issued/Revised: 12/1/2022
Employment & Human Services Dept. Manual Distribution: 1, 2A
B. The May recognition will commemorate Public Service Recognition Week, which falls on the
first week of May each year to appreciate public service employees in local, state and federal
government. Each EHSD employee will re ceive a small gift as a token of appreciation for their
ongoing dedication to serving Contra Costa County residents.
C. In December, the Executive Team will express gratitude for a year of service and winter holiday
wishes to all staff with a signed holiday card (not specific to any single winter holiday).
III. TYPES OF AWARDS & GIFTS
A. During the January Years of Service event, awards will be presented as follows:
1. 10 years of service: County pin with ruby chip
2. 15 years of service: County pin with emerald chip
3. 20 years of service: County pin with diamond chip
4. 25 years of service: Engraved pen
5. 30 years of service: Engraved paperweight
6. 35 years of service and above: Individual award
B. For the May Public Service Recognition Week commemoration, each EHSD employee will receive
a small gift or token delivered to his/her inbox or desk.
C. In December, EHSD’s Executive Team will give printed and signed holiday cards to all staff
members.
IV. PROCEDURES
A. January Years of Service event:
1. The Contra Costa County Human Resources (HR) Department sends years of service lists
twice a year for the Department. The list received in December covers years of service
anniversary dates from January through June of the upcoming year. The list received in May
covers years of service anniversary dates for July through December of the current year.
2. A Personnel/payroll designee will prepare an annual list of recipients sorted by years of service,
by month, and by Bureau using the lists provided by HR. The designee will review each list for
REPLACES:
SECTION:
PAGE NO.: 1
ISSUED/REVISED:
SERVICE AWARDS POLICY
SECTION: 23-903
PAGE NO.: 3
EFFECTIVE: 12/1/2022
DMCL # 15-34
Contra Costa County Issued/Revised: 12/1/2022
Employment & Human Services Dept. Manual Distribution: 1, 2A
accuracy and the current assignment of each honoree before sending to Community Relations
and the Bureau Directors.
3. Bureau Directors will receive an annual list as follows:
REPLACES:
SECTION:
PAGE NO.: 1
ISSUED/REVISED:
SERVICE AWARDS POLICY
SECTION: 23-903
PAGE NO.: 4
EFFECTIVE: 12/1/2022
DMCL # 15-34
Contra Costa County Issued/Revised: 12/1/2022
Employment & Human Services Dept. Manual Distribution: 1, 2A
Month List Received Month of Event Years of Service
Anniversary Date
December January (following year) January - December (previous
year)
4. Community Relations will coordinate the employee recognition proclamation process for all
employees celebrating 20 or more years of service; including, preparing the proclamation for
signing by the BOS and prepping the honoree for attendance at the BOS meeting.
5. By September during the year before the January event, Community Relations will determine the
Years of Service event date and location, and send a calendar invite to the Bureau Directors
when confirmed.
6. Bureau Directors will encourage staff to attend and provide names of attendees to designated
Administration support staff.
7. Community Relations will coordinate refreshments and decoratio ns, including an event program
listing the honorees. The cost of each Years of Service event shall not exceed an annual
maximum of $3,000 (approximate cost per employee will vary depending on the number of
employees honored).
8. During the recognition event, the Department Director will read the names of the honored staff,
and each Bureau Director will present the certificates and/or awards to their staff members.
9. Photos will be taken at each event and made available to the honorees.
B. May Public Service Recognition Week:
1. Community relations will research and recommend to the Executive Team a small token of
appreciation for all employees.
2. Community relations will purchase the approved token of appreciation and coordinate
dissemination to all employees at their desk or inbox.
REPLACES:
SECTION:
PAGE NO.: 1
ISSUED/REVISED:
SERVICE AWARDS POLICY
SECTION: 23-903
PAGE NO.: 5
EFFECTIVE: 12/1/2022
DMCL # 15-34
Contra Costa County Issued/Revised: 12/1/2022
Employment & Human Services Dept. Manual Distribution: 1, 2A
3. The total cost for the small gifts or tokens that each employee will receive shall not exceed
$7,000 (approximately $3.50 per employee with approximately 2,000 FTE).
4. For no additional county cost, Community Relations will also coordinate an accompanying set
of events and appreciations through the week (messaging in the EHSD newsletter and EHSD
Live! all staff meetings).
5. For not additional county cost, Bureaus and buildings may also coordinate an accompanying set
of events and appreciations through the week.
C. December winter holiday cards:
1. The Office of the Director will research and recommend to the Executive Team a winter holiday
card for all employees. The card will not be specific to any single winter holiday but will suffice
in general for any winter holiday an employee may celebrate.
2. The Office of the Director will purchase the approved card s.
3. Each card will be signed by the EHSD Director and Bureau Director.
4. The Office of the Director will coordinate the signing of the cards.
5. Each Bureau will coordinate dissemination of the cards to each employee in their Bureau.
6. The total cost for the holiday winter cards shall not exceed $5,000 (approximately $2.50 per
employee with approximately 2,000 FTE.)
V. CONTACT PERSON :
Director of Community Relations or his/her designee.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the delegation of authority to the County Treasurer for investing and reinvesting County funds and the funds of other depositors in
the County treasury, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, pursuant to section 53607 of the State Government Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County Treasurer manages and invests the funds of all County agencies, 21 Special Districts, 19 School Districts and one Community
College District. Centralizing this function creates a dedicated staff of investment professionals and creates greater efficiency, economies of
scale and greater investment power.
BACKGROUND:
State law provides that the Board of Supervisors may delegate to the County Treasurer the authority "to invest or to reinvest funds of a local
agency, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased" for a one year period. It is recommended that this delegation be renewed through the
calendar year 2023.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 608-9506
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.51
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE COUNTY TREASURER FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2023
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Delegation of Authority is not approved, each of the County Agencies, 21 Special Districts, 19 School Districts and one Community
College District would have to manage their own funds. This would be less cost efficient for all entities.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RECEIVE and ACCEPT the 2022 Annual Report submitted by the Aviation Advisory Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND:
On June 18, 2002, the Board of Supervisors (Board) adopted Resolution No. 2002/377, which requires that each regular and ongoing board,
commission, or committee shall annually report to the Board on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required
training/certification (if any), and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year, on the second Tuesday in December. The attached
report fulfills this requirement for the Aviation Advisory Committee.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Not applicable.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Greg Baer, 925-681-4200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.52
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Greg Baer, Director of Airports
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:2022 ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE AVIATION ADVISORY BODY
ATTACHMENTS
2022 AAC Annual Report
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Advisory Committee 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1, which requires that each advisory board, commission, or
committee report annually to the Board on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed
work plan or objectives for the following year. The attached report fulfills this requirement. An update of the IPM Program will be presented to
the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) on December 12, 2022.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the report is not accepted, the IPM Advisory Committee will not be in compliance with Resolution No. 2020/1.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Wade Finlinson, (925) 655-3214
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C.53
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contra Costa County Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee 2022 Annual Report and 2023 Work Plan
ATTACHMENTS
2022 Annual Report & 2023 Work
Plan
0
2022 IPM Annual Report
2022 Integrated Pest Management
Annual Report
IPM Advisory Committee Members
Jim Donnelly, Chair………………………………………………Public Member #3 Seat
Kimberly Hazard, Vice Chair…...Sustainability Commission Representative
Carlos Agurto, Secretary………..County Pest Management Contractor Seat
Susan Captain……………………………..……………………….Public Member #1 Seat
Stephen Prée……………………………………………………….Public Member #2 Seat
Amy Budahn……………………………………………..Public Member Alternate Seat
Andrew Sutherland………….….Environmental Organization Representative
Susan Heckly………………………...Fish & Wildlife Commission Representative
Michele Mancuso……………….County Stormwater Program Representative
Michael Kent…………………….….Health Services Department Representative
Dave Lavelle…………………………………………..Public Works Facilities Designee
Chris Lau……………………………………..Public Works Deputy Director Designee
Beth Slate…………………………………………Agriculture Commissioner Designee Hills above Marsh Creek Detention Facility
1
2022 IPM Annual Report
Executive Summary
Pesticide Usage
For the first time in the history of the IPM Program, the amount of pesticide applied to County
property has increased for two consecutive years. Usage numbers from 2018 to 2021 are
misleading since the Public Works Department Maintenance Division (PWD‐Maintenance)
suspended herbicide applications during that time. Nevertheless, usage this year represents a
nine‐year high and merits a closer examination of the program in 2023. The following chart
shows the total amount of pesticide used by County operations since 2000.
IPM Program Highlights
•The IPM Advisory Committee developed a new IPM plan template to help County pest
management operations comply with Administrative Bulletin 542. The new, simplified format is
nimbler than previous versions and highlights information relevant to public observation. Each
section within the template provides guidance for County staff while promoting a process that
refines how the Committee monitors pest management activities in County operations. The
Committee anticipates annually reviewing each completed departmental or divisional IPM plan
during its meetings.
•The Committee initiated the process to revise the County IPM Policy and Committee bylaws.
Potential revisions were identified during Committee discussions about potentially adding seats
to represent University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UCANR) and the Public
Works Airports Division (PWD‐Airports). Additional alterations being discussed include
converting the Public Member‐Alternate seat to an at‐large public member seat and designating
all seats as voting members. Committee membership has historically been listed in both the IPM
Policy and the bylaws. The Committee will likely propose removing the membership section
from the Policy so future revisions to either document would not require an update to both.
•The Committee completed Decision Documentation for Vegetation Management at County
Airports. The document transparently depicts how vegetation management decisions are made
at both County airports and identifies areas for refinement. An enhanced use of the Pesticide
Risk Footprint Tool is incorporated in the chemical controls section.
•The IPM Coordinator assisted the Board of Supervisors in preparing Resolution Number 2022/96
commemorating the 100th anniversary of the birth of IPM pioneer Dr. Robert van den Bosch in
Martinez. The resolution passed unanimously and is now on display in the Martinez Museum.
Van, as he was primarily known, coauthored a seminal article that is largely credited with the
introduction of several concepts now known as integrated pest management.
FY 00‐
01
FY 04‐
05
FY 09‐
10
FY 10‐
11
FY 11‐
12
FY 12‐
13
FY 13‐
14
FY 14‐
15
FY 15‐
16
FY 16‐
17
FY 17‐
18
FY 18‐
19
FY 19‐
20
FY 20‐
21
FY 21‐
22
Total Use 18,93914,396 8,925 7,397 6,646 7,495 5,685 5,287 5,146 4,709 3,914 2,319 924 3,687 6,578
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Lbs. of Active IngredientTotal Pesticide Use by County Operations Since 2000
(not including antimicrobial pesticides such as sanitizers and disinfectants)
2
2022 IPM Annual Report
2022 Integrated Pest Management Annual Report
Introduction
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has never been—nor will it likely ever become—a tidy system of definitive
rules and rigid metrics. IPM also has never been and probably won’t ever be the first topic of choice in most
conversations that occur amongst our species. Even within peculiar circles of professionals and citizens who
share concerns about weeds, bugs, germs, rodents and other accoutrements of the natural world, the topic is
often queued below a list of more elegant subjects.
Nevertheless, the IPM Advisory Committee continues to simultaneously engage in the ongoing experiment of
democracy as well as this sordid, yet critical pursuit. The difference between IPM victories and failures are
rarely clear. 2022 is no exception. On one hand, pesticide usage in County departments reached a 9‐year‐
high. On the other, the Committee developed an IPM plan template that should illuminate paths toward the
refinement of pest management programs in the County.
November 12, 2022 marked exactly twenty years since the Board of Supervisors (Board) adopted Contra Costa
County’s first IPM Policy. Another local anniversary significant to the global practice of IPM was also observed
earlier in the year. On March 31st, the Board
commemorated the centennial of the birth of IPM
pioneer Robert van den Bosch (Van) in Martinez.
Van was born and raised in Martinez; he and his
wife Peggy were residents of Kensington. Along
with contemporaries he initiated concepts of pest
containment in agricultural systems that have
since been incorporated into urban integrated
pest management programs.
As we reflect on the legacy of Professor Van den
Bosch and two decades of IPM in the County, the
quest to pursue a more perfect program endures.
Pesticide use reporting will continue to be a key
component of the IPM Program, but it does not
fully convey contextual complexities. Climate
impacts, staff shortages, and other considerations
will continue to complicate an already dynamic
overlap between natural systems and the built
environment. The new IPM plan format for
operations within the County is intended to move
towards an elevated level of stewardship.
Perhaps the next 20 years of the IPM program will feature enhanced mechanisms for measuring holistic
management outcomes. Most land and structural properties operated by the County and similar institutions
are typically managed with a focus on a single function. An expanded view of many of these parcels reveal
latent beneficial resources that extend beyond useful square footage or road miles. Co‐benefits of an
ecosystem‐based strategy could include drought resilience, carbon sequestration, habitat improvements and
many others.
A copy of the journal Hilgardia and the Robert
van den Bosch Medal in Biological Control & IPM
3
2022 IPM Annual Report
Pesticide Usage
Between 2000 and 2020, the County reduced pesticide use by 95%. In the two years since that point, usage is
now trending upwards. This year, the amount of herbicide applied on County properties reached the highest
point it has been since fiscal year (FY) 2012‐13. The increase is attributed to PWD‐Maintenance who manage
vegetation on roadsides, rights‐of way, and Flood Control properties. The Decision‐Making Subcommittee and
PWD‐Maintenance intend to review herbicide use as part of the process of revising pertinent decision
documents in 2023.
PWD‐Maintenance has four Vegetation Management Technician positions and FY 2021‐22 was the first time in
several years that all four positions were filled. Since then, three of the four have either retired or resigned.
The combination of being fully staffed during the reporting period and the need to catch up on deferred
maintenance in untreated areas during the 26‐month suspension of herbicide applications, contributed to the
drastic increase. This was also the first full year of herbicide applications in the Maintenance Division since FY
2017‐18. It’s important to note that a single year’s data does not represent a trend, and the planned
engagement with PWD‐Maintenance in 2023 will further clarify details of this critical program. A guiding
principal will be to appropriately juxtapose chemical controls with mandated fire prevention, traffic safety,
and flood prevention expectations.
The chart below shows the last 12 years of pesticide usage broken down by department or division. Note
that these totals with limited exceptions do not include sanitizers and disinfectants which are classified as
pesticides by the Environmental Protection Agency. The full Pesticide Use Summary Comparison details
Countywide pesticide usage in FY 2021‐22.
FY
10-11
FY
11-12
FY
12-13
FY
13-14
FY
14-15
FY
15-16
FY
16-17
FY
17-18
FY
18-19
FY
19-20
FY
20-21
FY
21-22
PWD-Airports 000000004513452588740
PWD-Facilities 5 9 16 6 1630171016193232
PWD-Special Dist.457720.0030.0010.00100000
PWD-Grounds 113 378 377 492 338 433 303 337 647 400 304 259
Agriculture 795 539 529 498 153 76 68 94 26 160 350 196
PWD-Maintenance 6,439 5,713 6,565 4,688 4,780 4,607 4,321 3,473 1,179 0 414 5,351
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Lbs. of Active IngredientPesticide Use by Division/Department Since 2010
4
2022 IPM Annual Report
Development of the Departmental/Divisional IPM Plan Template
The most notable achievement of the Committee in 2022 was the creation of a departmental/divisional IPM
plan template. The Committee reviewed existing departmental IPM plans in 2021 and advised the IPM
Coordinator to draft an updated template. The first draft was introduced in January. The Committee worked
from January through July to refine the format to be more user‐friendly for County staff while promoting a
process that improves how the Committee—and the public, by extension—monitors pest management
activities in County operations.
With the exception of the PWD‐Facilities IPM plan developed by Pestec, the other departmental IPM plans had
not been revised since 2013 (PWD‐Facilities require selected structural pest management contractors to
submit an IPM plan as specified in the competitive bidding process). The 2013 versions were thorough and
included an admirable level of detail. However, the Committee found that a simpler format would better
support the goals of the IPM Policy.
Administrative Bulletin 542 requires the Agriculture and Public Works Departments to "develop and maintain
a written IPM Plan, or its equivalent, specific to the operational needs of the department and consistent with
the (University of California Statewide IPM Program) IPM definition." The policy also requires each
department to designate a departmental IPM Coordinator and provide an annual report of pest management
activities to the County IPM Coordinator by September 30th of each year.
One key role of the IPM Advisory Committee as stated in the IPM Policy is to "serve as a resource to help both
department heads and the Board of Supervisors review and improve existing programs and the processes used
for making pest management decisions." The Committee will be better situated to fulfil that role if the new
template is adopted by each applicable department or division.
The IPM Advisory Committee anticipates annually reviewing each completed divisional IPM plan during regular
meetings. This is in addition to the requirement that each departmental IPM Coordinator provide an annual
report to be included with the Committee report as referenced above. Presumably, the discussion that occurs
during the annual IPM plan review will clarify expectations for the divisional IPM annual reports to be
submitted later in the year.
The proposed template including written guidance for every section is featured in Appendix A. Previous
versions of departmental IPM plans can be found at the following links:
2013 IPM Plan for the Agriculture Department
2013 IPM Plan for PWD‐Maintenance
2021 IPM Plan for PWD‐Facilities (Pestec)
2013 IPM Plan for PWD‐Grounds
Initiated Revisions to Committee Bylaws and the County IPM Policy
During the July meeting, the Committee reviewed their bylaws which were last updated in 2017. That
discussion led to the creation of an ad hoc subcommittee to examine potential changes. Since many elements
of the bylaws are replicated in the County IPM Policy, the subcommittee simultaneously reviewed both
documents. They met four times between September and November. The full Committee discussed the
recommended revisions in their November meeting and will continue to deliberate on the topic in 2023.
The most substantial bylaws change being considered includes amending Committee membership to add a
representative from University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UCANR) as well as a staff seat
representing PWD‐Airports. The Committee is also considering the designation of all seats as voting members.
2022 IPM Annual Report
Pending changes to the IPM Policy involve the removal of duplicate items also found in the bylaws as well as
minor editorial modifications.
There is precedent for inclusion of UCANR in the County IPM Program. The previous iteration of the
Committee (prior to 2009) had a designated UC seat. The current Environmental Organization Seat is filled by
Dr. Andrew Sutherland, an IPM Advisor with the Cooperative Extension (a program of UCANR). Dr. Sutherland
also served in the Public Member #2 At‐Large Seat from 2016 through 2019. There are several UCANR‐
affiliated professionals in the region whose areas of expertise would benefit the work of the Committee on a
wide range of IPM‐related topics. Those include human‐wildlife interactions, urban forestry, specialty crops,
rangeland management, urban agriculture, and other relevant disciplines.
The rationale for adding a representative from PWD‐Airports is that they now manage all components of their
sizable vegetation management program. Prior to 2018, airport herbicide applications were performed by
PWD‐Maintenance staff. Airport Safety Officers now use chemical controls to supplement their vegetation
management efforts that consist of mechanical, cultural, and biological tactics. Other changes to staff seats
on the Committee were explored. The executive management teams of the Agriculture and Public Works
Departments were consulted during this process and are supportive of the modifications under consideration.
Additional Accomplishments of the Committee
Other notable activities of the Committee in 2022 included the development of Decision Documentation for
Vegetation Management at County Airports and the facilitation of discussions on the following topics:
1.IPM specifications on leased property.
2.Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in artificial turf.
3.Review of previous Committee recommendations.
1.Decision‐Making Subcommittee members raised concerns about potential liabilities associated with pest
management activities conducted by private lessees on County property near the Buchanan Field
Airport. Representatives from the Public Works Real Property Division (PWD‐Real Property) and PWD‐
Airports attended the March meeting of the full Committee to discuss the concerns. The presenters
noted that current lease agreements—both for when the County acts as lessee and lessor—do not
specifically include language that requires or encourages IPM practices. The IPM Policy applies only to
County‐maintained properties, but Administrative Bulletin 542 requires “reasonable efforts to negotiate
the use of IPM practices as a part of” leases with terms of more than three months.
5
Habitat Management Lands at Byron Airport
6
2022 IPM Annual Report
2.During the May meeting, Dr. Salar Parvini from the National PFAS Workgroup Council presented
information regarding PFAS in artificial turf. The item was of interest to the Committee since it included
the installation of artificial turf as a type of cultural control in Decision Documentation for Vegetation
Management at Juvenile Hall. The Committee referred additional consideration of the issue to the
Decision‐Making Subcommittee who discussed it in August. Subcommittee members expressed the
importance of being aware of these hazards, but cited the lack of regulatory guidance and general
information about exposure risks to formally make recommendations pertaining to the topic. In
September, this was reported back to the full Committee who declined to take action.
3.Supervisor Candace Andersen attended the March meeting to discuss previous recommendations from
the Committee. The discussion highlighted progress on some recommendations and identified
implementation barriers on others. It was noted that even though many recommendations may not be
feasible within current operations, they embody IPM values that County departments should aspire to.
A tracking table of all recommendations made since 2018 is updated annually and provided to TWIC. In
2022, PWD‐Maintenance and PWD‐Grounds made progress on recommendations from previous years
as pictured below.
Carlos Agurto from Pestec
operates a CO‐Jack machine to
control ground squirrels along a
Rheem Creek levee in Richmond.
PWD‐Maintenance initiated the
pilot in response to excessive
burrowing at this location. In
2019, the Committee
recommended using this tactic as
part of a year‐round effort to
protect critical infrastructure.
Pest populations were reduced as
a result of this effort. Ongoing
trials and analysis are needed to
fully evaluate potential expansion.
In 2020, the Committee made a
recommendation to explore partnerships
with organizations like Save Mount Diablo
(SMD) who own property adjacent to the
154‐acre parcel that contains Marsh Creek
Detention Facility. County staff met with
members of SMD’s Land Stewardship
Team to assess plant communities and
other ecological assets. Pictured left to
right is Sean Burke‐SMD Land Programs
Director, Debbie King‐ Grounds Supervisor
from PWD‐Grounds, and Roxana Lucero‐
SMD Land Stewardship Manager.
7
2022 IPM Annual Report
Attendance, Training, and Member Engagement
IPM Advisory Committee Attendance
2022 1/20 3/17 5/19 7/21 9/15 11/17 Total
Absences
Public Member #1 P P P P 2
Public Member #2 P P P P P 1
Public Member #3 P P P P P 1
Public Member Alternate P P P 3
Environmental Org. Representative P P P 3
Sustainability Comm. Representative P P P P P 1
Fish & Wildlife Comm. Representative P P P P P P 0
Stormwater Program Representative P P P P P 1
Health Services Representative P P P P P 1
Ag Commissioner Designee P P P P 2
PWD-Facilities Designee P P P P P 1
PWD Deputy Director Designee P P P P P 1
County Pest Mgmt. Contractor P P P P 2
Total Present 9 12 10 8 10 10
Voting Members Present 6 8 6 8 6 6
P=Present
All public members of the Committee are current on Brown Act and Better Government Ordinance
Training.
There have been no unexpected vacancies occur within the reporting period.
In addition to the six meetings of the full Committee, many members also attended subcommittee
meetings throughout the year. The Decision‐Making Subcommittee met four times and the Ad
Hoc Bylaws Subcommittee also had four meetings.
No Committee meetings were canceled this year due to lack of quorum.
A quorum of voting members was present for all meetings with the exception of half of the
November meeting.
Regarding current public members, two reside in Board District 1, three in District 2, one in District
4, and one in District 5. No public member currently lives in Districts 3 or the eastern portion of
District 5.
The IPM Committee will focus on the following objectives in 2023 that correspond to the four IPM Policy goals:
1.Minimize risks to the general public, staff and the
environment as a result of pest control activities
conducted by County staff and contractors.
a.Implement an IPM training program that
complies with County policy and other
relevant mandates.
b.Identify IPM-related impacts of climate
change and assist County operations
create a better built environment.
2.Create, implement and periodically review written
IPM plans in the Agriculture, Health, and Public
Works Departments specific to their operational
needs and consistent with the UC definition and
this policy.
a.Review revised IPM plans for County
departments and divisions during the year
and advise departmental/divisional IPM
coordinators on what elements to
highlight in their annual report.
3.Promote availability, public awareness and public
input into written county pest management plans
and records.
a.Investigate the feasibility of standardizing
pest management recordkeeping across
County Departments and centralizing
reporting protocols.
4.Create public awareness of IPM through education.
a.Coordinate meeting agendas around
specific themes that promote
engagement on IPM topics of mutual
interest to residents and adjacent public
agencies.
2023 Work Plan of the IPM Advisory Committee
8
2022 IPM Annual Report
Appendix A: Revised Departmental/Divisional IPM Plan Template
9
2022 IPM Annual Report
1 Departmental/Divisional IPM PlanTemplate
Revised 7/21/2022
Revised:
On November 12, 2002, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the Integrated Pest Management definition provided
by the University of California Statewide IPM Project, which states: "Integrated Pest Management is an ecosystem-based
strategy that focuses on long-term prevention of pests or their damage through a combination of techniques such as
biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural practices, and use of resistant varieties. Pesticides are
used only after monitoring indicates that they are needed according to established guidelines, and treatments are made
with the goal of removing only the target organisms. Pest control materials are selected and applied in a manner that
minimizes risks to human health, to beneficial and non-target organisms, and to the environment."
The Agriculture and Public Works Departments will use the IPM principles set forth in this Administrative Bulletin
whenever providing pest management services. Each department will establish an IPM program. As a part of the
respective IPM programs, each department will develop and maintain a written IPM Plan, or its equivalent, specific to the
operational needs of the department and consistent with the IPM definition above. Each Department will designate a
Departmental IPM Coordinator responsible for implementation. (excerpt from Administrative Bulletin 542)
Section 1: Overview of the pest management function in the department/division
Contra Costa County Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program
Departmental/Divisional IPM Plan for
Guidance: Include a general description of the department or division and the role of pest management in
the context of its broader delivery of services. Characterize and quantify site types and list pests
typical to each property. Where applicable, highlight regulatory mandates, customer service
expectations, or industry standards that impact how pest management decisions are made. This
section may also include organizational values that support the implementation of integrated
pest management.
IPM Advisory Committee members recommend the inclusion of quantifiable data (miles of
roadside, acres, square feet, etc.) to describe sites and also include the budgeted amount used
on pest management-related efforts.
(Name of department or division)
(Date of Revision)
2 Departmental/Divisional IPM PlanTemplate
Revised 7/21/2022
Section 2: Description of available staff and contractor resources
Name and title of departmental/divisional IPM Coordinator:
Classification titles of staff who perform pest management tasks and number of positions allocated:
Description of IPM training currently available to staff:
Names of private companies contracted to perform pest management tasks and scope of service rendered:
(not to be confused with the Countywide IPM Coordinator)
Guidance: This should include titles of all positions making pest management decisions and those
performing field tasks.
Guidance: Detail which IPM-focused training is currently provided to staff and how it complies with the IPM
Policy and provisions in the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP).
The Countywide IPM Policy states “Training programs will be developed under the direction of
the County IPM Coordinator with the concurrence of the IPM Advisory Committee to ensure that
County employees understand IPM techniques and County Policy.”
The MRP requires “that all municipal employees who, within the scope of their duties, apply or
use pesticides are trained in IPM practices and the Permittee’s IPM policy and/or ordinance and
standard operating procedures.” (The current version of the MRP is available at this link:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/board_decisions/adopted_orders/2022/R2-
2022-0018.pdf
Guidance: List current service providers under contract that have any pest control component. This includes
services such as landscape maintenance, grazing, trapping, disking, etc.
3 Departmental/Divisional IPM PlanTemplate
Revised 7/21/2022
Section 3: Operational considerations
Description of how sites are monitored for pests and the process for selecting pest management tactics:
Description of non-chemical pest management tactics most commonly used:
Pesticide selection process:
Guidance: Indicate who generally monitors each property for pests and the frequency of these visits. What
methods are used? Also include the process for responding to service requests from citizens,
customers, or regulatory bodies. Articulate what pest tolerance levels are in place and describe
how they differ from one property type to another. If pest tolerance levels are not uniform
throughout the property portfolio, describe how certain sites or segments of sites are prioritized.
Guidance: List all non-chemical methods currently in use and include operational advantages and
limitations of the different techniques. Project the long-term viability of each practice and
indicate what barriers currently prevent broader application of each method.
Guidance: Detail how pesticides are selected to minimize risks to human health, to beneficial and non-target
organisms, and to the environment. List all pesticides currently being used as well as alternative
products being considered.
4 Departmental/Divisional IPM PlanTemplate
Revised 7/21/2022
Section 4: Long-Term Planning
Environmental Stewardship:
Innovation:
Annual Goals:
Guidance: Provide a statement that addresses the department/division’s ability to incorporate other
potential co-benefits of ecosystem-based pest prevention activities. These may include elements
such as wildlife habitat preservation, carbon sequestration, wildfire resilience, and others.
Guidance: Record priorities for potential pest management pilot projects and research endeavors. List
upcoming capital projects or other initiatives that may be able to incorporate proactive principles
of integrated pest management.
Guidance: List measurable pest management goals that the department or division is pursuing this year.
Progress on these goals should be included in departmental submissions that are included in the
Annual IPM report.
Where applicable, tie goals to those listed in the IPM Policy, any relevant decision
documentation, or previous recommendations from the IPM Advisory Committee.
5 Departmental/Divisional IPM PlanTemplate
Revised 7/21/2022
Section 5: Transparency
Guidance: Describe how the department/division will fulfil the IPM policy goal to promote availability, public
awareness and public input into written county pest management plans and records.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the East Contra Costa Irrigation District ("District"), including the list of designated positions
and disclosure categories.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The District has amended its Conflict of Interest Code and submitted the revised code, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant
to Government Code sections 87306 and 87306.5.
The changes include an updated list of positions designated to file conflict of interest statements, including the addition of one position, the
deletion of one position, and revision to the title of two positions, and revisions to the list of disclosure categories. These changes will ensure
that the Conflict of Interest Code accurately reflects the current positions and organizational structure in use by the District. A red-lined version
of the Conflict of Interest Code is attached as Exhibit B.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
None.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, (925)
655-2200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, Aaron Trott, General Manager, East Contra Costa Irrigation District
C.54
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Conflict of Interest Code for the East Contra Costa Irrigation District
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speaker: No name given.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A - Conflict of Interest Code for the East Contra Costa Irrigation District
Exhibit B - Conflict of Interest Code for the East Contra Costa Irrigation District - REDLINED
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Kensington Police Protection & Community Services District ("District").
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The District has amended its Conflict of Interest Code, including its Exhibit A which provides disclosure categories and the list of positions
designated to file conflict of interest statements, and submitted the revised Code, attached as Exhibit 1, to the Board for approval pursuant to
Government Code sections 87306 and 87306.5.
The changes include the deletion of two positions and addition of one position designated to file conflict of interest statements. These changes
will ensure that the Conflict of Interest Code accurately reflects the current positions and organizational structure in use by the District. A
red-lined version of the Code is attached as Exhibit 2.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
None.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, (925)
655-2200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, Tony Constantouros, Gen. Manager, Kensington Police Protection & Com. Svcs. Dist
C.55
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Conflict of Interest Code for the Kensington Police Protection & Community Services District
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 - Conflict of Interest Code for the Kensington Police Protection & Community Services
District
Exhibit 2 - Conflict of Interest Code for the Kensington Police Protection & Community Services
District - REDLINED
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Rodeo Sanitary District, including the list of designated positions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Rodeo Sanitary District has amended the list of designated positions in the Appendix A to its Conflict of Interest Code and submitted the
revised Appendix A, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant to Government Code sections 87306 and 87306.5.
The Appendix has been revised to add one position. This change will ensure that the Conflict of Interest Code accurately reflects the current
positions and organizational structure in use by the District. A red-lined version of the Appendix A is included as Exhibit B, and the District’s
Resolution adopting the revised code is included as Exhibit C.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
None.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/06/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, (925)
655-2200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 6, 2022
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc: Kurtis C. Keller, Deputy County Counsel, Richard Frakes, Secretary, Rodeo Sanitary District, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
C.56
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel
Date:December 6, 2022
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Conflict of Interest Code of the Rodeo Sanitary District
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A - Appendix A of the Conflict of Interest Code of the Rodeo Sanitary District
Exhibit B - Appendix A of the Conflict of Interest Code of the Rodeo Sanitary District -
REDLINED
Exhibit C - Rodeo Sanitary District Resolution No. 2022-14