Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11292022 - Completed Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 KAREN MITCHOFF, CHAIR, 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board meeting will be accessible in-person, via television, and via live-streaming to all members of the public. Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27, ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32, and can be seen live online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. Persons who wish to address the board during public comment or with respect to an item on the agenda may comment in person or may call in during the meeting by dialing 888-278-0254 followed by the access code 843298#. A caller should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item, by pushing "#2" on their phone. Access via Zoom is also available using the following link: https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/87344719204 . Those participating via Zoom should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. To provide contact information, please contact Clerk of the Board at clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us or call 925-655-2000. Meetings of the Board are closed-captioned in real time. Public comment generally will be limited to two minutes. Your patience is appreciated. A Spanish language interpreter is available to assist Spanish-speaking callers. A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair. Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES November 29, 2022            9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) 1. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) Tavane Payne v Contra Costa County, WCAB Nos. ADJ6905482, ADJ90467391. Robert Insalaco and Leslie Lomax v. County of Contra Costa, et al. and Cross Complaint Lucas T. Du and Mary Wong v. County of Contra Costa, et al.; Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case No. MSC17-00725 2. C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(2): [Two potential cases.] D. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (Gov. Code, § 54957) Title: County Counsel Inspirational Thought- “Develop an attitude of gratitude, and give thanks for everything that happens to you, knowing that every step forward is a step toward achieving something bigger and better than your current situation.” – Brian Tracy, motivational speaker Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator Tom Geiger, Chief Assistance County Counsel  There were no announcements from Closed Session.   CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.111 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each)   PRESENTATION proclaiming November 2022 as National Caregivers Month. (Supervisor Gioia)    Jivetta Gregory, on behalf of In Home Supportive Services workers.   DISCUSSION ITEMS   D.1 HEARING to consider approving the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, a 354-unit continuing care retirement community in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area, including approving a General Plan amendment, rezoning ordinance, tentative map, preliminary and final development plan, land use permit, and community benefits agreement; CONSIDER certifying the project environmental impact report and related actions under the California Environmental Quality Act (County File Nos. CDGP20-00001, CDRZ20-03225, CDMS20-00007, CDLP20-02038, CDDP20-03018). (Loewke Planning Associates, Applicant; Diablo Glen Walnut Creek CCRC LLC, Owner) (Sean Tully, Department of Conservation and Development)       Speakers: Paul; Nancy, Walnut Creek; Patricia; Jan Warren; Michelle, Save Seven Hills Ranch; Marilyn Thorn, Janet Mahoney, Lori; Amy Casey; Denise, Walnut Creek; Katalyn; Terryann Sturiale; Claudia; Shane, student of Seven Hills; Lafayette resident; Camden, student of Seven Hills; Greg Reed; Catherine, student of Seven Hills; Marilyn, Walnut Creek; David Rippon; Barbara Gilbert; Pat Blake; Eleanor Dase; Caroline Love; Eric Harrison; Henry Dhalal; Tom Hansen; Marcia Newey; Tracy Gimble; Ibrahim; Dhang Leal; Glen Ariak; Richard Scow; Cameron Ledger, student of Seven Hills; Olysia Epps, Save Seven Hills Ranch; Margaret Kupta; Eason, student of Seven Hills; Ali Singh, M.D.; Imar; Sherryl Ettinger; Katherine Jume; Staifer Kerr, Heather Farms; Diane Yoder; Charlie Walters; Whitney Livermore; Tosh Dhanalal; Claire Meisner; Julie Meisner; Lindsey; Joel Grossman; Katherine Oldslager; Ianthus Martin; Jim Martin; Kim Raymond; Tom Levy; Ozgur Kozaci; Stephanie Dark, Save Seven Hills; Victor Flores; Nico Nagle; Rosemary Nishikawa; Charles Clancy; LInden Van Wert; Baty; Melissa Pettit; Brandon; Yen Chen; Mike Scott; Amy Ayala; Killian Garvey; Monique Harrison; Erin Marnocha; Jacqui Levey; Traci Huahn; Sameer Advani; Jim Frey; Greg Marsh; Paul Ho; Sandy Huang; Karen Altamirano; Caller 9973; Michelle Watts; Mo Rivi; Jarrod Epps; Rashna Larson; Mathew Janopaul; Ernie Olatunji; Wren Amos; Katherine Alberts; Kathleen McNamara; Leslie Hunt, President Open Space Coalition; Emily McKenzie; Krista Deringer; Thomas Lyle, Heather Farms; Bill Knoller; No Name Given; Dr. Tom Bye; Christian Balzer; Kristin Lemasny; Stan Roe; Kathryn; Laura Lee; Radika; Rosalee; Amy Wirth; Rochelle Portier; Jackson Epps; David Kellogg; Marcella Rubilleto, Seven Hills School Trustee; Andy Hutchison; Matilda, student of Seven HIlls; Margie Pierce and Stella Pierce; Jamil Akoni, Seven Hills School Trustee; Alex Lee; Lauren Wright; Colleen Cookson; Sylvia; Robert; Mark Wexler; Noah Epps, student of Seven Hills School; Kristin Ho; Kaitlin; Lori Siegel; Karen; Kevin Burke; Rina Shah; Nicole Ambrose . Written commentary received is attached.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.2 HEARING to consider adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-27, an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of fulfillment centers, parcel hubs, and parcel sorting facilities in the North Richmond area through November 29, 2023. (Francisco Avila, Department of Conservation and Development)       Speaker: No name given.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 3 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    There were no consent items removed for discussion.   D. 4 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)    No name given, spoke on questions of the method of approving Measure X funding items.   D. 5 CONSIDER reports of Board members.    Supervisor Gioia acknowledged the attendance of today's meeting by his office intern, Andrew Melendez; Supervisors Andersen, Supervisor Mitchoff, Burgis, and Glover attended the California State Association of Counties (CSAC). Supervisor Burgis was appointed Chair of the Delta Protecion Commission.   ADJOURN    Adjourned today's meeting at 4:40 p.m.   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/386 ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Starr Street, except for emergency traffic, on October 30, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover    C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/398 ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Hillgrade Avenue between Lunada Lane and Crest Avenue, on November 14, 2022 and November 15, 2022 from 8:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m., for the purpose of replacing a utility pole and installing a switch, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 3 APPROVE the San Pablo Dam Road and Bailey Road Signal Hardware Upgrades Project, DETERMINE the project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project, Bay Point and El Sobrante areas. (92% Highway Safety Improvement Program, 8% Local Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/392 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for subdivision SD13-09315, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (100% Developer Fees)       RELISTED to a future date uncertain.   C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/397 approving the Road Improvement Agreement for land use permit LP16-02031, for a project being developed by CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Concord area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/399 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547, for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/400 accepting a Grant Deed of Development Rights for subdivision SD20-09547, for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 8 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/401 approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547, for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 9 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/403 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, for a project being developed by SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 10 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/404 approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, for a project being developed by SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C. 11 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar rental agreement with Allen Christensen, for a south-facing hangar at Buchanan Field Airport effective November 3, 2022, in the monthly amount of $359, Pacheco area (100% Airport Enterprise Fund).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar rental agreement with Rick Burton, for a north-facing shade hangar at Buchanan Field Airport effective November 16, 2022, in the monthly amount of $169, Pacheco area (100% Airport Enterprise Fund).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 13 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Herman Nicholas Barnes vs. Contra Costa County; and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $61,000 as recommended by the Director of Risk Management. (100% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 DENY claims filed by Alexander W. Bensch, Moises A. Hernandez Guevara, Darlene Landis, Carson Rhodes, Cheryl Rhodes, Victor White, and Robin Winn.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of October 1, 2022, through October 31, 2022.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Statutory Actions   C. 16 ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for October 2022.      AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C. 17 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/396 recognizing El Cerrito Councilmember Janet Abelson for 23 years of dedicated public service to the San Francisco Bay Area, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 18 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/411 honoring Zac Shess for his service on the Board of Directors for the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 19 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/417 proclaiming November 2022 as National Caregivers Month, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C. 20 APPOINT Clark Wallace to the District 3 Alternate seat on the Assessment Appeals Board for a term ending September 3, 2023, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 APPOINT Allison A. Picard to the Airport Managers Appointee 2 Seat on the Airport Land Use Commission for a term ending on May 4, 2026, as recommended by the Director of Airports.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 22 APPOINT Nicholas Bryant, Interim Director of the Community Services Bureau, as Alternate to Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Department Director, on the Contra Costa First 5 Children and Families Commission.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 23 APPOINT Michael Schlemmer to the B5 Communications Center Managers’ Association Representative seat, Scott Wannamaker to the B6 Contra Costa Fire Chiefs’ Association Representative seat, Jonas Aguiar to the C1 Ambulance Providers seat, Ari Kestler to the C6 Emergency Department Physicians seat, and REAPPOINT Jon King to the B7 Contra Costa Police Chiefs’ Association Representative seat on the Emergency Medical Care Committee for terms ending September 30, 2024, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 APPOINT Charles Tramaine to the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council Seat No. 2 on the Los Medanos    C. 24 APPOINT Charles Tramaine to the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council Seat No. 2 on the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee for a term ending on December 31, 2024, as recommended by the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/415 to add County Finance Director, in addition to Assistant Risk Managers, as an official alternate to act on behalf of Contra Costa County with regard to official matters of Public Risk Innovation Solutions and Management (PRISM), effective November 1, 2022, as recommended by the Director of Risk Management. (No Fiscal Impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 APPOINT Joshua Klein to the Member of the Bar seat on the Public Law Library Board of Trustees for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2023 and expiring on December 31, 2023, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 REAPPOINT Neil Tsutsui to the Board of Supervisors Appointee seat on the East Bay Regional Parks District Park Advisory Committee for the two-year term of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 APPOINT Najari Smith, Janet Berckefeldt, Germaine McCoy, Arlene Kikkawa-Nielsen, Ben Miyaji, Nilofar Gardezi, and Margot Melcon to the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C. 29 Fleet Internal Service Fund (0064)/Behavioral Health Admin (0467): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No.005023 authorizing the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $321,999 from Behavioral Health Admin (0467) to General Services - Fleet Operations (0064) for the purchase of ten (10) vehicles for transportation of A3 (Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime) clients. (100% California Department of Health Care Services funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C. 30 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26014 to reclassify one position #14106 and its incumbent from Systems Accountant II (represented) to Information Systems Project Manager (represented) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26068 to add one Sheriff's Chief of Management Services - Exempt in the Office of the Sheriff. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26059 to cancel three Environmental Health Specialist II (represented) positions and add three Environmental Health Specialist III (represented) positions in the Health Services Department. (100% Environmental Health program fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26064 to add one Clerk-Recorder Services Specialist and cancel one Clerk-Specialist Level position (both represented) in the Clerk-Recorder Department. (100% County General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26069 to increase the hours of one vacant Institutional Services Worker-Generalist position from 20/40 to 40/40 in the Probation Department. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26073 to increase the hours of one Medical Social Worker II (represented) position from 30/40 to full-time and one Community Health Worker II (represented) position from 32/40 to full-time in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C. 36 ADOPT Resolution 2022/409 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept the 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Services Improvement Grant, with the Governor's Office of Emergency Services, as fiscal agent, in an initial amount of $71,558 for support of forensic training for the period beginning April 1, 2023 through the end of the funding period. (100% Federal, No County Match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, in an amount not to exceed $563,447 for establishing clean air centers and environments in public spaces across the County effective upon execution of agreement by BAAQMD and ending upon the later of five years from final payment or November 14, 2027. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/382 to replace Resolution No. 2021/358 clarifying the approval and    C. 38 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/382 to replace Resolution No. 2021/358 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in an amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (No fiscal impact).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 39 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/383 to replace Resolution No. 2021/357 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the date of the grant award, through June 30, 2024, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Health Care Services, to pay the County an amount up to $193,200,000 for the provision of substance abuse prevention, treatment and recovery support services to County residents for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2027. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/408 approving and authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner or designee, to apply for and accept the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement in the amount of $738,249 for marine patrol and boating regulation enforcement for the period July 1, 2023 through the end of available funding. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Public Health, to increase the amount payable to the County by $590,789 to a new total payment limit of $3,123,477 to provide medical and support care to HIV-infected residents for the County Public Health HIV Care and Minority AIDS Initiative Project with no change in the term. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Department, to increase the amount payable to the County by $249,165 to a new amount of up to $1,021,198 and to extend the term date to June 30, 2023 for the County’s Coordinated Outreach Referral and Engagement Program to provide homeless outreach services within the Bay Area Rapid Transit system. (No county match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 RATIFY the Contra Costa County Probation Department's application for grant funding from the California Office of Traffic Safety, and authorize the Chief of Probation, and or designee, to execute an agreement, and accept funding in an amount not to exceed $398,845 for intensive probation supervision for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. (100% State)       ADOPTED Resolution No. 2022/402 to ratify the Contra Costa County Probation Departments application  ADOPTED Resolution No. 2022/402 to ratify the Contra Costa County Probation Departments application for grant funding from the California Office of Traffic Safety, and authorize the Chief of Probation, and or designee, to execute an agreement, and accept funding in an amount not to exceed $398,845 for intensive probation supervision for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/413 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept allocations from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) allocation awards in the amount of $415,126 for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 4, and $240,271 for the Housing Navigation and Maintenance Program (HNCP) Round 1, for the period of 24 months from effective date of fully executed HCD agreement, as recommended by Employment and Human Services Director. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health), to pay the County in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for county’s participation in the FoodNet Expanded Case Exposure Ascertainment Project to study foodborne bacteria for the period August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc., to pay the County an amount up to $137,813 for the County’s participation in the California Emerging Infections Program to study foodborne bacteria for the period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to submit an application with the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, to pay the County an amount of up to $500,000 to perform enforcement/compliance and surveillance activities at waste tire facilities for the Environmental Health Waste Tire Enforcement Program for the period from June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2024. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director or designee to apply for and accept the Governor’s Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) 15% discretionary funds for Workforce Accelerator Fund 11 for the Workforce Development Board (WDB) to develop and implement an innovation impact project in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the period March 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024., as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (100% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C. 50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with ClearGov in    C. 50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with ClearGov in an amount not to exceed $108,350 to provide software licensing and configuration, including three years of maintenance and set up support, of a digital budget book publishing software system for the period December 12, 2022 through December 11, 2025.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract with Peregrine Technologies, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $570,000 to provide a statistical software system for executive analysis and reporting to facilitate law enforcement planning and response, for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025, with an option to extend for up to two additional years through November 30, 2027 at a cost of $190,000 per year. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, to pay $236,383 to Medline Industries, Inc for medical supplies, surgical supplies, laboratory supplies, diagnostic imaging supplies, cleaning supplies, disaster supplies, miscellaneous minor equipment, and low unit of measure (LUM) services provided to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) from June 1, 2022, through June 30, 2022. (90% Hospital Enterprise Fund I, 10% American Rescue Plan Act)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE the bid documents, including the contract General Conditions, Technical Specifications, and Construction Task Catalog for job order contracts 021, 022, 023 and 024 for future repair and remodeling projects at various County facilities; and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to solicit bids to be received on or about January 4, 2023, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with The Gordian Group (dba The Mellon Group), to increase the payment limit by $750,000 to a new payment limit of $3,250,000 and extend the term through February 29, 2024, to provide additional Job Order Contracting program development and implementation services for various County facilities projects, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Allegis Group Holdings, Inc. (dba TEK Systems, Inc.) in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to provide technical support and temporary technical assistance for the period of November 15, 2022 through December 31, 2024. (100% User Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Jiva Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to provide endocrine, diabetes, allergy and sleep medicine services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 57 APPROVE clarification of Board action on October 18, 2022 (C. 45) which authorized the Chief Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with the Fresh Lifelines for Youth, to correct the term to September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025, to operate its STAY FLY Program to respond to the needs of Contra Costa County’s Transition Aged Youth to prevent further justice system involvement with no change to the contract limit of $1,043,045. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Director, up to $25,000 in transportation and food vouchers from the following: 100 Tri Delta Transit vouchers each with a $27.50 value, totaling $2,750; 99 BART vouchers each with a $6.90 value, totaling $683.10; 131 ARCO vouchers each with a $50 value plus $16.50 for ground shipping, totaling $6,566.50; 100 Walmart grocery vouchers each with a $100 value, totaling $10,000; and 50 Target grocery vouchers each with a $100 value, totaling $5,000 to be provided to low-income clients living with HIV or AIDS and served by the HIV/AIDS and STD Program for the period from December 31, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (100% HOPWA Grant Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Daniel T. Oberlin, M.D., effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $30,000 to a new payment limit of $960,000 to provide additional urology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers with no change in the term. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Robert Liebig, M.D, effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $50,000 to a new payment limit of $2,090,000 to provide additional radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers with no change in the term January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order in the amount of $400,000 with Performance Health Supply, Inc. for the purchase of specialized rehabilitation equipment and supplies for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $140,000 to provide adult residential care and mental health services for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (100% Mental Health Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County, effective December 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $50,000 to a new payment limit of $186,710 to provide additional Mental Health Services Act Prevention and Early Intervention services with no change in the term, and to increase the six-month automatic extension payment limit by $25,000 to a new payment limit not to exceed $93,355 through December 31, 2023. (100% Mental Health Services Act)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Seneca Family of Agencies, effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $130,000 to a new payment limit of $7,785,806 to provide additional mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed children and their families in the Martinez School District with no change in the term, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $65,000 to a new payment limit of $3,892,903 through December 31, 2023. (50% Federal Medi-Cal, 46% Mental Health Realignment, 3% Local School Districts, 1% Probation Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Vickie Lee Scharr, in an amount not to exceed $260,000 to provide consultation, technical support and planning services to the West Contra Costa Health Care District for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (100% West Contra Costa Healthcare District)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Eighty20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $339,000 to provide consultation, technical support and planning services for West Contra Costa Health Care District matters for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (100% West Contra Costa Healthcare District)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Specialty Laboratories, Inc. (dba Quest Diagnostic Nichols Institute), in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 to provide outside clinical laboratory testing services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (80% Hospital Enterprise Fund I, 20% American Rescue Act Plan)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Delta Personnel Services, Inc. (dba Guardian Security Agency), in an amount not to exceed $5,913,009 to provide security guard services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and COVID-19 testing and immunization sites for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Martinez Unified School District, in an amount not to exceed $197,073 to provide mental health prevention and early intervention services for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, including a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $98,536. (100% Mental Health Services Act)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment    C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health), effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $890,185 to a new payment limit of $1,685,281 to provide additional consulting and technical assistance on community health promotion for Public Health’s Health Emergency Unit and Health Services Emergency Medical Service Unit with no change in the term July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (44% Measure X, 32% County General Funds, 16% State grants, 8% Federal grants)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels, effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $3,528 to a new payment limit of $466,028 with no change in the term or automatic extension through September 30, 2023 to include meal quantities and prices for home-delivered meals for homebound senior citizens and HIV/AIDS patients in the County’s Senior Nutrition Program. (100% Ryan White CARE Act State Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Clerk-Recorder, or designee, to execute a contract with Pacific Records Storage in an amount not to exceed $90,000 to provide climate-controlled storage of microfilm records. (100% Recorder Micrographics/Modernization Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Matrix HG, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 to provide on-call plumbing services at various County buildings, for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2026, Countywide. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee to execute a contract with PH Senior Care, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), in an amount not to exceed $1,069,440 to provide augmented board and care services for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. (88% Mental Health Realignment, 9% Mental Health Services Act; 3% County General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Tri-City Power Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000 to provide routine maintenance and emergency repairs to County Uninterruptible Power Supply units at various County buildings, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025, Countywide. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., effective December 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $1,740,788 to a new payment limit of $12,990,788 and extend the term of the contract through May 31, 2025, for construction management services for the West County Re-entry Treatment and Housing Replacement project, the Security Systems Upgrade project, and for smoke control design review services at the West County Detention Facility. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with VistAbility in an amount not to exceed $820,000 for packet fulfillment services, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025, Countywide. (100% User Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 78 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Applied Remedial Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $815,252 to provide removal and disposal of hazardous waste materials, audit reporting and staff education services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 79 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with the Fresh Lifelines for Youth, in an amount not to exceed $448,296 to establish a network of Transition Aged Youth (TAY) service agencies, and design a model for delivering services to TAY through the network of contracted agencies for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, an amendment to the Participating Addendum and blanket purchase order with W.W. Grainger, Inc., to extend the term through December 31, 2023, with no change to the payment limit, for supplies, parts and equipment required by County departments, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 81 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute an amendment to the reimbursement agreement with The Watershed Project for an additional $41,000 in State grant funding for the North Richmond Watershed Connections Project (Project) and to revise certain dates for the Project; and to execute an amendment to the reimbursement agreement with Urban Tilth to revise certain dates for the Project; and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute any further administrative amendments, North Richmond area. (100% State Coastal Conservancy Grant Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 82 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with United Language Group, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $705,000 to provide written language translation services for the County’s Health Services Department for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 83 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Aaron Hayashi, M.D., Inc., effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment limit of $2,190,000 to provide additional radiology services with no change in the term through September 30, 2024. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover    C. 84 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, effective December 14, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $404,000 to a new payment limit of $868,362 and extend the term date through December 15, 2025 to reimburse the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District for additional electronic patient care records hosting and support services for the Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services System. (100% Measure H Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 85 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with GE Precision Healthcare, LLC, effective December 27, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $223,704 to a new payment limit of $4,812,025 to provide additional maintenance and repair services for new medical imaging equipment and systems at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers with no change in the term. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 86 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a purchase order amendment with Caltronics Business Systems to increase the payment limit by $150,000 to a new total of $349,900 for copier rentals and managed print services with no change to the term. (50% Federal, 50% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 87 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Axon Enterprise, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $12,503,168 for the purchase of body-worn cameras, in-car camera systems, storage, and software for the term of January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2032. (100% Measure X)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 88 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Department, up to $18,000 in gift cards as follows: 200 Amazon gift cards each with a $30 value totaling $6,000; 200 Target gift cards each with a $30 value totaling $6,000; 200 Safeway gift cards each with a $30 value totaling $6,000 to support activities as allowed by Community Mental Health Services Block Grant and Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act for the First Hope Program. (100% Community Mental Health Services Block Grant/ Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 89 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a blanket purchase order, with Ray A. Morgan Company, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $2,522,448, to provide copier rentals and managed print services for the period December 23, 2022 through December 22, 2025. (60% Federal, 35% State, and 5% County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 90 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to provide on-call project management services for the period December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2025, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 91 ACCEPT the 2021/22 Animal Benefit Fund Report, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 92 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/416 approving and authorizing the Auditor-Controller, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, to make payments to former sworn Office of the Sheriff employees for reimbursement of their time and travel expenditures related to subpoenaed Court appearances. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 93 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to close all branches of the County Library according to the holiday and training schedule outlined in the attached "2023 Library Closures" list. (No Fiscal Impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 94 APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, medical staff advancement, voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive Committee and the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 95 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/394 to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 96 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/395 approving the Side Letter between Contra Costa County and the Physicians and Dentists Organization of Contra Costa (PDOCC) modifying Section 32.4 - Duration of Agreement of the Memorandum of Understanding to extend the contract from October 31, 2022 through December 31, 2022.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 97 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by the Contra Costa Health Plan Medical Director and the Health Services Director, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 98 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to issue a payment on behalf of the Public Works Director in the amount of $2,300 from County Service Area R-7, payable to the Alamo Rotary Foundation of Alamo for the holiday lights at Andrew H. Young Park, Alamo area. (100% County Service Area R-7 Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 99 ACCEPT the Annual Report of the Kensington Municipal Advisory Council, as recommended by Supervisor    C. 99 ACCEPT the Annual Report of the Kensington Municipal Advisory Council, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.100 DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.101 APPROVE publication of a notice of intention to consider approving the conveyance of one fee parcel to the City of Antioch through a Grant Deed on December 13, 2022, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Antioch area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.102 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with University of the Pacific for its Department of Physical Therapy, effective December 31, 2022, to include occupational therapy students to receive field instruction at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers with no change in the term. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.103 AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to submit Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan Grant materials to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as recommended by the Sustainability Committee. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.104 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a waiver of the County policy that requires competitive bidding for community-based services to enable the Health Services Department to expend limited one time Federal Substance Abuse Block Grant (SABG) Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) funding for the period July 1, 2021 – December 31, 2022 by the December 31, 2022 federal deadline, as recommended by the County Administrator and the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.105 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Counsel, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County a conflict waiver acknowledging a potential conflict of interest and consenting to Fennemore, LLP representing the Contra Costa Transportation Authority while continuing to provide legal services to the County related to eminent domain and real property matters. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.106 AUTHORIZE the Board of Supervisors, in all its capacities, and its subcommittees, and its advisory bodies to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e), make related findings, and take related actions, as recommended by County Counsel.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.107 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE clarification of Board action taken on October 4, 2022 (C.50) to change the legal name to RossDrulisCusenbery Architecture, Inc., from Ross, Drulis, Cusenbery Architecture, to change the payment limit to $1,500,000 from $900,000; and to change the term to November 29, 2022 through November 28, 2027, with two one-year extension options, from September 13, 2022 through September 12, 2027, with an option for a one-year extension. (100% CCCFPD Capital Construction Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.108 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE clarification of Board action taken on October 4, 2022 (C.52) to change the name of the contracting agency to Shah Kawasaki Architects, Inc., from Shah Kawasaki Architects, to change the correct payment limit to $1,500,000 from $900,000, and to change the term to November 29, 2022 through November 28, 2027, with the option for two one-year extensions, from the term September 13, 2022 through September 12, 2027, with an option for a one-year extension. (100% CCCFPD Capital Construction Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.109 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County a Novation Contract with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, in an amount not to exceed $4,450,600, to provide mental health services including wraparound and outpatient treatment to children in West County for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023, in an amount not to exceed $2,225,300. (50% Federal Medi-Cal, 45% Mental Health Realignment, 5% Measure X)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.110 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/412 approving the revised Emergency Operations Plan as approved by the Emergency Services Policy Board, as recommended by the Public Protection Committee. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.111 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County a settlement and release agreement with SunPower Corporation, Systems, to pay the County $127,066 for lost energy savings due to delays in installation of solar generating and storage facilities under power purchase agreements for 4545 and 4549 Delta Fair Blvd., Antioch, and 2530 Arnold Drive and 1000 Ward Street, Martinez, and take related actions to bring the sites into commercial operation, as recommended by the Public Works Director. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 655-2000. Anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda may contact the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California. Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000 or using the County's on line subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be viewed: www.contracosta.ca.gov STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2. CERTIFY that the environmental impact report prepared for the Project was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, was reviewed and considered by the Board of Supervisors before Project approval, and reflects the County's independent judgment and analysis. 3. CERTIFY the environmental impact report for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project. 4. ADOPT the attached CEQA findings and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the Project. 5. SPECIFY that the Department of Conservation and Development, located at 30 Muir Road, Martinez, California 94553, is the custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Board of Supervisors is based. 6. ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/410, amending the General Plan to change the land use designation of the project site from Single-Family Residential Medium Density (SM) to Congregate Care/Senior APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sean Tully, 925-655-2878 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) Housing (CC) (County File #CDGP20-00001). 7. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2022-36, rezoning the project site from a General Agricultural (A-2) district to a Planned Unit (P-1) district (County File #CDRZ20-03255). 8. APPROVE the tentative map for the Project (County File #CDMS20-00007). 9. APPROVE the preliminary and final development plan for the Project and the associated tree permit (County File #CDDP20-03018). 10. APPROVE the land use permit for the Project to allow the sale of alcohol within the proposed clubhouse (County File #CDLP20-02038). 11. APPROVE the findings in support of the Project. 12. APPROVE the Project conditions of approval. 13. APPROVE the attached community benefits agreement. 14. APPROVE the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project. 15. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the necessary application deposit and is obligated to pay supplemental fees to cover all additional costs associated with the application process. BACKGROUND: See Attachment A. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In the event the proposed project is not approved, the applicant will not obtain the required General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Minor Subdivision, Development Plan, and Land Use Permit entitlements necessary to allow the proposed Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This application is to establish a continuing care retirement community. Because residency at the facility will be limited to people aged 60 and above, there will be no increased demand for public school services as a result of the project. The increase in demand for childcare services will solely be a result of the anticipated employee force, and the increased need determined by a childcare needs study would be mitigated as part of the Project conditions of approval. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Paul; Nancy, Walnut Creek; Patricia; Jan Warren; Michelle, Save Seven Hills Ranch; Marilyn Thorn, Janet Mahoney, Lori; Amy Casey; Denise, Walnut Creek; Katalyn; Terryann Sturiale; Claudia; Shane, student of Seven Hills; Lafayette resident; Camden, student of Seven Hills; Greg Reed; Catherine, student of Seven Hills; Marilyn, Walnut Creek; David Rippon; Barbara Gilbert; Pat Blake; Eleanor Dase; Caroline Love; Eric Harrison; Henry Dhalal; Tom Hansen; Marcia Newey; Tracy Gimble; Ibrahim; Dhang Leal; Glen Ariak; Richard Scow; Cameron Ledger, student of Seven Hills; Olysia Epps, Save Seven Hills Ranch; Margaret Kupta; Eason, student of Seven Hills; Ali Singh, M.D.; Imar; Sherryl Ettinger; Katherine Jume; Staifer Kerr, Heather Farms; Diane Yoder; Charlie Walters; Whitney Livermore; Tosh Dhanalal; Claire Meisner; Julie Meisner; Lindsey; Joel Grossman; Katherine Oldslager; Ianthus Martin; Jim Martin; Kim Raymond; Tom Levy; Ozgur Kozaci; Stephanie Dark, Save Seven Hills; Victor Flores; Nico Nagle; Rosemary Nishikawa; Charles Clancy; LInden Van Wert; Baty; Melissa Pettit; Brandon; Yen Chen; Mike Scott; Amy Ayala; Killian Garvey; Monique Harrison; Erin Marnocha; Jacqui Levey; Traci Huahn; Sameer Advani; Jim Frey; Greg Marsh; Paul Ho; Sandy Huang; Karen Altamirano; Caller 9973; Michelle Watts; Mo Rivi; Jarrod Epps; Rashna Larson; Mathew Janopaul; Ernie Olatunji; Wren Amos; Katherine Alberts; Kathleen McNamara; Leslie Hunt, President Open Space Coalition; Emily McKenzie; Krista Deringer; Thomas Lyle, Heather Farms; Bill Knoller; No Name Given; Dr. Tom Bye; Christian Balzer; Kristin Lemasny; Stan Roe; Kathryn; Laura Lee; Radika; Rosalee; Amy Wirth; Rochelle Portier; Jackson Epps; David Kellogg; Marcella Rubilleto, Seven Hills School Trustee; Andy Hutchison; Matilda, student of Seven HIlls; Margie Pierce and Stella Pierce; Jamil Akoni, Seven Hills School Trustee; Alex Lee; Lauren Wright; Colleen Cookson; Sylvia; Robert; Mark Wexler; Noah Epps, student of Seven Hills School; Kristin Ho; Kaitlin; Lori Siegel; Karen; Kevin Burke; Rina Shah; Nicole Ambrose . Written commentary received is attached. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/410 Attachment A - Staff Report Attachment B - CEQA and Project Findings Attachment C- Project Conditions of Approval Attachment D- Resolution No. 2022/410 - General Plan Amendment Attachment E- General Plan Change Map Attachment F-Ordinance No. 2022-36 - Rezoning Attachment G- Zoning Change Map Attachment H- Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Attachment I - Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Attachment J- Project Plans Attachment K- Supplemental Photosimulations Attachment L- Revised Villa Configuration & Sections Exhibit Attachment M- Public Comments Attachment N- City of Walnut Creek Letters Attachment O- Community Benefits Agreement Attachment P- Proposed Land Dedication Exhibit Attachment Q - Presentation Slides MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/410 Signed Ordinance No. 2022-36 Correspondence Received I Correspondence Received II Correspondence Received III THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/410 In the matter of approving a General Plan Amendment (County File #CDGP20-00001) for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project; WHEREAS: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on November 29, 2022, to consider the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, proposed for the the unincorporated Walnut Creek area. The Project includes the certification of an EIR and adoption of a Mitgation Monitoring and Reporting program prepared for the Project, a General Plan Amendment (County File #CDGP20-00001), a rezoning ordinance (County File #CDRZ20-03255), a minor subdivision (County File #CDMS20-00007), a Preliminary and Final Development Plan (County File #CDDP20-03018), and a Land Use Permit (County File #CDLP20-02038). 1. The General Plan Amendment for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project reclassifies land from General Agricultural (A-2) to Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC). 2. The General Plan Amendment for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project is the fourth General Plan Amendment fpr the calendar year 2022. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES as follows: The Board of Supervisors makes the following General Plan Amendment findings: Adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment (GPA) is consistent with the provisions of the Urban Limit Line (ULL). No change to the ULL would occur and the Project does not require extension of urban services beyond the ULL. The subject site is located inside the ULL, and therefore may be developed with “urban” and “non-urban” uses, as defined in the 2005-2020 Contra Costa County General Plan. The proposed land use designation, Congregate Care (CC), is urban. A. Adoption of the proposed GPA will not result in a violation of the 65/35 Land Preservation Standard (the “65/35 Standard”), established through voter adoption of Measure C-1990 and reaffirmed through adoption of Measure L-2006. Under the 65/35 Standard, no more than 35 percent of the land in the county may be developed with urban uses and at least 65 percent of the land must be preserved for non-urban uses such as agriculture, open space, parks, wetlands, etc. The existing land use designation for the subject site, Single-Family Residential Medium Density (SM), is an urban land use designation. No non-urban land use designations are present on-site. The proposed CC land use designation is also an urban designation. Therefore, the percentage of land with urban and non-urban designations will not change as a result of the GPA. B. The Project complies with the objectives and requirements of Measure J-2004, the Contra Costa Growth Management Program (GMP), and related Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) resolutions. The CCTA GMP Implementation Guide (2021) sets forth procedures for local agency consultation and evaluation of impacts related to proposed GPAs. The Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project would generate fewer than 100 a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips and would not impact a Route of Regional Significance. The project is therefore exempt from the GMP GPA Review Process. Regardless, the DEIR was referred to TRANSPAC, the Regional Transportation Planning Committee for Central Contra Costa County, for review and comment. No comments were submitted. C. 1. Adoption of the proposed GPA will not cause the General Plan to become internally inconsistent. The General Plan comprises an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of policy governing land use in the unincorporated areas of the county. The existing SM land use designation allows for single-family residential development across the subject site. The proposed CC designation allows for more intense development over the same area. Changing the land use designation from SM to CC does not affect or conflict with the policies applicable to the site, nor does it otherwise amend the General Plan. D. Adoption of the proposed GPA is in the public interest. The existing SM land use designation allows for development of approximately 112 single-family homes, and possibly up to 166 homes with a density bonus consideration. The SM designation was applied to the subject site over 30 years ago, when demand for new housing, particularly senior housing, was less acute. California is in the midst of a housing crisis and redesignation of the site to CC allows for development of 354 independent living units for seniors (a 216 percent increase over the base SM density), plus 100 assisted living units including 33 skilled nursing beds and 23 memory care units. E. Contact: Sean Tully, 925-655-2878 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Attachment A Staff Report Department of Conservation and Development County Board of Supervisors Tuesday, November 29, 2022    STAFF REPORT Project Title: Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project County File(s): #CDGP20-00001, #CDRZ20-03225, #CDMS20-00007, #CDLP20- 02038, #CDDP20-03018 Applicant Owner: Loewke Planning Associates Diablo Glen WC CCRC LLC Zoning: General Plan: General Agricultural (A-2) Single-Family Residential, Medium Density (SM) Site Address/Location: 850 Seven Hills Ranch Road, Walnut Creek (APNs: 172-150-012 and 172-080-007) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Status: A Final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and was distributed on 10/11/2022. The EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts, for which feasible mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to reduce the impacts to less than significant levels. Project Planner: Sean Tully, Principal Planner (925) 655-2878 / sean.tully@dcd.cccounty.us Will Nelson, Principal Planner (925) 655-2898 / will.nelson@dcd.cccounty.us I. BACKGROUND This hearing is to consider approving the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, a 354-unit continuing care retirement community in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area, and to consider certifying the project environmental impact report under the California Environmental Quality Act. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment (CDGP20-00001), Rezoning (CDRZ20-03255), Minor Subdivision (CDMS20-00007), Preliminary and Final Development Plan (CDDP20-03018), Land Use Permit (CDLP20-03038), BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 2 of 25 and a community benefits agreement. After a hearing on October 26, 2022 to consider the Project, the County Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors not certify the EIR and not approve the Project. Since that time, the applicant has prepared additional materials and agreed to several Project revisions to address concerns raised by the Commission and the public, as described below and reflected in the proposed conditions of approval. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors certify the Project EIR and approve the Project. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes the following discretionary reviews by the County: A. General Plan Amendment: Amendment to the Land Use Map of the Land Use Element to change the existing Single-Family Residential, Medium Density (SM) designation of the site to a Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC) designation. B. Rezoning: Rezoning of the project site from the existing General Agricultural (A-2) District to a project-specific Planned Unit (P-1) District. C. Tentative Map: A Tentative Parcel Map to reconfigure the two existing parcels that comprise the site from approximately 13 and 17 acres in area to 25 and 5 acres in area with refined legal descriptions D. Development Plan: Preliminary and Final Development Plan to allow the demolition of an existing ranch house and outbuildings, and the construction of a self- contained, State-licensed continuing care retirement community (CCRC) and other improvements consisting of the following primary elements: o 354 independent living units split between 302 apartment style units housed in a large apartment building, and 52 individual units housed within 30 single-story buildings. o An 85,000 square foot health care center containing 100 care units, including 33 skilled nursing units and 23 memory care units, for residents requiring daily assistance or daily medical attention. o Amenities including a swimming pool, tennis and bocce courts, dog parks, gardening center, walking trails, gym, auditorium, restaurants, bar, theatre, library, and clubhouse. o Approximately 594 parking onsite spaces, including 300 spaces within the apartment style building garage, 110 spaces along the internal access roads, 104 spaces in single-story building garages and driveways, and 80 spaces in BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 3 of 25 the health center surface parking area. o A 20,000 square foot maintenance building. o Approximately 375,000 cubic yards of earth moving activities resulting in a net export of approximately 75,000 cubic yards of soil from the site. o Access and circulation improvements consisting of an extension of Kinross Drive and a realignment of the portions of Seven Hills Ranch Road within the site boundaries to serve as internal access roads to all project components. E. Tree Permit: Tree permit to allow the removal of up to 353 trees. III. ENVIRONMENT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Environment: The project site is located in an unincorporated pocket of Walnut Creek, in central Contra Costa County. The property is primarily surrounded by urban land uses on all sides such as single-family residential developments, Seven Hills School, and Heather Farm Park. A concrete-lined portion of Walnut Creek runs along the entirety of the project site’s western boundary, and both the Iron Horse Regional Trail and the Contra Costa Canal Trail are located within 500 feet of the property. Major roadways such as Ygnacio Valley Road and Treat Boulevard are within one half-mile, and Interstate 680 is located approximately one half-mile west of the project site. B. Site Description: The subject property is a 30.6-acre site comprised of two parcels located along Seven Hills Ranch Road. The project site is characterized by rolling topography that ranges from 100 to 190 feet in elevation. The majority of the site is undeveloped, aside from an existing ranch house and outbuildings located in the southern portion of the site. The property is lightly wooded with mature trees, most of which can be found along the site boundaries and adjacent to the existing ranch house. There are seasonal wetlands and perennial drainage resources that traverse the site in an east-west direction in the central region of the site. IV. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) The Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) determined that an EIR was required for the project and distributed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on July 23, 2021. The Draft EIR (DEIR) was released for public review on March 11, 2022, and was available for public review through May 10, 2022. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 4 of 25 The Responses to Comments/Final EIR and attached appendices (collectively, FEIR) was published and distributed on October 11, 2022. The EIR (which consists of the DEIR and attached appendices and the FEIR) identifies potentially significant environmental impacts that would occur if the project is implemented, and recommends feasible mitigation measures that would reduce those impacts to less than significant levels. All mitigations are included within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which describes the timing and responsibility for monitoring compliance with all mitigation measures. All mitigation measures are included in the recommended conditions of approval. V. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. The EIR identifies environmental impacts that would occur if the Project were approved and implemented. Potentially significant impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels were identified in the EIR in the following areas: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology and Soils; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Noise; and Tribal resources. 1. Aesthetics: Operation of the Project would introduce new sources of light to the area by way of the new independent living units and the healthcare buildings on the project site. This potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 2. Air Quality: Construction of the project has the potential for generating significant levels of average daily ROD and NOx emissions; generating fugitive dust in the form of PM10 and PM2.5; introducing new sources of TACs; and increasing cancer risks. These potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3. Biological Resources: Construction of the Project has the potential to directly impact and possibly result in the take of protected wildlife species, impacting riparian woodland habitat, and temporary and permanent loss of wetland habitat. These potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 4. Cultural Resources: Construction of the Project has the potential for impacting undiscovered archaeological resources and impacting buried human remains. This potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 5. Geology and Soils: Construction of the Project has the potential for exposing people or structures to significant ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, and expansive soils; and impacting undiscovered paleontological resources. These potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 6. Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Construction of the Project has the potential to expose construction workers and nearby residents to asbestos-containing material, BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 5 of 25 lead-based paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls. These potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 7. Hydrology and Water Quality: Construction of the Project has the potential to impact stormwater drainage systems. This potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 8. Noise: Construction and operation of the Project has the potential to generate temporary but significant noise levels; permanent noise levels which exceed noise and land use compatibility thresholds; and significant vibration impacts. These potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 9. Tribal Resources: Construction of the Project has the potential to impact buried tribal cultural resources. This potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 10. Utilities and Service Systems: Construction of the associated water and sanitary sewer line extensions, stormwater drainage tie-ins, and electricity tie-ins have the potential for resulting in adverse environmental effects. This potentially significant impact can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The attached CEQA Findings summarize the environmental determinations about the Project’s significant impacts before and after mitigation and summarizes the Project’s individual and cumulative impacts. All mitigation measures will be implemented through the project conditions of approval. B. Public Comment: Multiple pieces of correspondence (letters and emails) were received during the public comment period for the DEIR. The County also received public comments prior to the application being deemed complete and throughout the application review process. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the County responded to those comments that raised significant environmental issues and that were received during the public comment period for the DEIR, and those comments are included and responded to in the Final EIR. All other comments have likewise been reviewed and are included in the Project record of proceedings. Attached to this report are public comments related to the Project received after the County Planning Commission hearing. VI. STAFF ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION A. General Plan Land Use Type: The project site is currently located within a Single-Family Residential, Medium Density (SM) land use designation. As part of the Project, the applicant seeks BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 6 of 25 approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the 30-acre site to a Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC) designation. Senior citizen congregate care housing is the sole use explicitly listed as being allowed in the designation. However, unique criteria with respect to the allowance of ancillary uses can be included when the designation is adopted for the site. The Project proposes the establishment of a self-contained, State- licensed CCRC with independent living unit and health center elements. This land use type is substantially consistent with the allowed land use. Density: Unlike the majority of the land use designations that fall within the same land use category, the CC designation does not include a density range or maximum density that would need to be maintained at the site. Therefore, there is no risk for the Project’s independent living unit count conflicting with the General Plan. Property Size: Unlike the majority of the land use designations that fall within the same land use category, the CC designation does not include a property size range that would need to be implemented at the site. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed parcel reconfiguration, as shown on the tentative parcel map, conflicting with the General Plan. Specific Area Policy: The Land Use Element of the County General Plan provides policies for specific geographic areas of the unincorporated County. These specific area policies focus on providing additional policies that pertain to the unique characteristics and needs of each identified area. Pursuant to Figure 3-2 of the County General Plan, the Project is not located within any of the identified specific policy areas. Growth Management: The General Plan’s Growth Management Element establishes policies for traffic levels, performance standards for fire, police, parks, sanitary services, water services, and flood control to ensure that public facilities consistent with the adopted standards are provided. Although largely undeveloped, the project site is located within an urbanized area of the County and is immediately surrounded by well- established developments. In addition, the site has been historically located within an urban land use designation, and has been anticipated for development in long-range planning analysis by the County and other responsible agencies. As a result of the urban surroundings and the historical land use designation for the site, much of the public facilities necessary to support the Project already exist and are of a capacity that can accommodate the demand that will be created by the project. More specifically, fire and police protection services have already been established in the area at a level that can accommodate the project. Although infrastructure connections to the site will be required, public water and sanitary sewer services have already been established in the surrounding area, and can accommodate the proposed facility’s connection and demand. With respect to parks, Heather Farm Park is located immediately east of the site and additional outdoor recreational areas will be included BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 7 of 25 as part of the Project. Lastly, the portion of Walnut Creek adjacent to the western property boundary of the site has already been channelized, which reduces the potential for flood hazards at the site. As summarized above, the Project’s location within an urbanized area of the County combined with the historical urban land use designation creates a circumstance wherein compliance with the policies and goals of the Growth Management Element are clear. A more in-depth discussion of the project’s consistency with the Growth Management Element is available in the Growth Management Element Consistency section of the Project Findings for this staff report. Jobs / Housing Balance: The General Plan states development applications for commercial, light industrial, and office development of more than 10,000 square feet or generating 25 or more jobs must address the impact of that development upon the subregional jobs/housing balance. The proposed Project includes the construction of a self-contained CCRC with 354 independent living units and a health center in the Walnut Creek area of unincorporated Contra Costa County. The Central County Region had an estimated 60,000 households and 81,000 jobs in 2015 per the Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG) Plan Bay Area 2050. To meet the jobs/housing goals provided by ABAG, the Central County area is anticipated to add an additional 29,000 households and lose 7,000 jobs by 2040. The proposed Project contributes to the anticipated jobs/housing development in the Central County subregion by providing living accommodations for approximately 354 additional households. With respect to jobs, the project will not contribute to the anticipated job loss. However, the anticipated full-time equivalent of 225 jobs that will be created by the project constitutes less than a one percent increase in the subregion’s estimated 2015 job total. Therefore, the project will not result in a significant adverse effect on the desired jobs trend. B. Zoning Land Use: The project is located entirely within a General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district, which primarily allows for agricultural uses, agriculturally related commercial uses, and some less-intense low density residential uses. However, the existing A-2 zoning district is inconsistent with the underlying SM designation, and thus the proposed General Plan amendment and rezoning would cure the existing inconsistency between the subject site’s zoning and General Plan designation. The applicant proposes to rezone the entire project site to a project-specific Planned Unit (P-1) zoning district. As shown in Table 3-5 of the General Plan’s Land Use Element, P-1 projects may be approved in any land use designation, but the P-1 district is the only zoning district determined to be consistent with the proposed CC designation. If approved, the new P-1 district would allow for flexibility of applicable development standards necessary to accommodate the proposed unique land use, provided that BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 8 of 25 substantial consistency with the General Plan and intent of the County Ordinance Code is maintained. The project site is surrounded by residential-, open space-, and planned unit-zoned properties of both the unincorporated County and City of Walnut Creek. The majority of these properties have been developed with single- and multiple-family residences, and associated ancillary structures and land uses. However, additional land uses such as Seven Hills School, Heather Farm Park, and Diablo Hills Golf Course are also within the surrounding area. Rezoning the project site to a P-1 district will establish a district that is consistent with a CCRC use, but also allow the facility to be designed and constructed in a manner that that is compatible with surrounding uses on both an aesthetic and operational level. The accommodations provided via the proposed independent living units will expand on the types of living units available in the neighboring subdivisions along Cherry Lane, Walnut Boulevard, and Marchbanks Drive. In addition, the proposed health center will provide medical services to residents both in and outside the CCRC facility, as space permits. This element of the proposed facility enhances the breadth of medical services currently provided by John Muir Hospital, which is located approximately one half-mile southeast of the project site. C. Facility Operation and Regulation: As proposed, the facility will be categorized and operated as a self-contained, State-licensed continuing care retirement community. Residents of the facility will not own any interest in or lease any of the independent units, nor will they own land or interest in the facility as a whole. Instead, residents will enter into a continuing care contract with the operator of the facility. This contract consists of a promise by the facility operator to provide a range of services for a particular period of time, in exchange for payment. In the case of the proposed facility, residents will pay an entrance fee that is based on the size and location of the unit they choose, and a subsequent monthly fee is paid to cover day-to-day living and medical expenses. Three contract types will be available to residents and will offer differing levels of prepaid care, monthly payments, and direct expense for the resident. The proposed facility will be licensed through the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), which is responsible for approving, monitoring, and regulating the facility. Responsibilities of the CDSS include evaluating provider applications to determine financial feasibility of proposed communities, ensuring specific disclosures are included in offered continuing care contracts, and ongoing monitoring of performance and financial conditions for the provider’s ability to fulfill contractual obligations. Once a provider is issued a Certificate of Authority to enter into continuing care contracts, they are required to submit annual audited financial statements and reserve reports to the CDSS. In the event a provider is not in satisfactory financial condition, the CDSS has the authority to take corrective measures, including the levying of fines and seeking a court appointed administrator to take over operation of the facility. In addition to obtaining the Certificate of Authority mentioned above, the facility BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 9 of 25 operator will also be required to obtain a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE) license, and a Skilled Nursing Facility License issued by the California Department of Public Health. D. Independent Living Units: The facility will consist of 354 independent living units, split between 52 units housed in 30 single-story buildings and 302 units housed in a large apartment-style building. The single-story units will range in size from approximately 1,430 to 2,720 square feet and consist of two- and three-bedroom floor plans. Each unit will include a private driveway and one-car garage. The remaining independent living units will consist of an apartment configuration within a large building. These units will be available in one-, two-, and three-bedroom floorplans, and will range in size between 835 and 1,580 square feet in area. Parking for the apartment-style units will be accommodated in a 300-space parking garage located on the first floor of the building and via surface parking along the access road surrounding the building. E. Health Center: The facility will also include an 85,000 square foot health center building that will be constructed in the northeastern region of the project site. This building will house 100 care units, including 33 skilled nursing units and 23 memory care units that will be available to both residents of the facility and the general public (space permitting). Health care services would be available to facility residents on a priority basis, and to non-residents as space permits. F. Alcohol Sales: As part of the project, the applicant is requesting approval to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within the clubhouse area of the apartment-style building. Alcoholic beverages will be available to residents of the facility and their guests, but not to the general public. G. Access: The primary access to the facility would be provided at the southern region of the site via an extension of Kinross Drive. Both construction and operational traffic will utilize this access. This roadway extension would be constructed within an existing 50- foot right-of-way previously dedicated to the City of Walnut Creek. If granted by the City, the proposed Kinross Drive extension would likely require that the project sponsor also obtain a permit from the City and enter into a perpetual maintenance agreement with the City for privately funded maintenance of the improvements. A formal emergency vehicle access (EVA) and gate meeting fire district standards will be provided at the northern boundary of the site at North San Carlos Drive. Although not required, a secondary EVA and gate will also be provided at the southern boundary of the site where Seven Hills Ranch Road meets the site boundary. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 10 of 25 H. Applicability of Housing-Based Fees and Zoning Regulations: If approved, the proposed facility will be an institutional use that is licensed and regulated by the State Department of Social Services. Those living at the facility will never own or lease property at the facility because the living units are strictly an amenity provided as part of the care contract between future patients and the facility operator. As they are only available as part of the State-regulated care contract and not offered as a standalone element, County staff has determined that the independent living units are an amenity of the institutional use and not residential units under the County Zoning Ordinance. Based on this determination, the independent living units of the project would not be subject to fees and other provisions of the County Ordinance that are solely applicable to residential land uses, such as the County’s Affordable Housing (Division 822) and Park Dedications (Division 920) ordinances. Nevertheless, the applicant has agreed to establish and implement a financial assistance program whereby the facility operator would establish an annuity in an initial amount of $2,000,000 for the purpose of providing ongoing subsidies to lower- income households that would not otherwise have the financial means to live in the facility. Condition of Approval No. 35 provides for the annuity to assist lower-income households and a target occupancy rate of 10% of the independent living units. The program would prioritize Very-Low- and Lower-Income Households. The applicant has also agreed to enter into a community benefits agreement with the County to enhance the public benefits provided to the community, in addition to those benefits derived directly from the Project. Specifically, the applicant has agreed to make community benefit payments totaling $3,000,000 over ten years for, at the County’s sole discretion, establishing or maintaining parks or trails; maintaining or beautifying roadways, rights-of-way, or open space; or establishing, maintaining, or beautifying other community improvements. Staff recommends that the County coordinate with the City of Walnut Creek in the allocation and expenditure of funds received pursuant to the proposed community benefits agreement. I. Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA): In 1969 the State of California adopted the Housing Element and Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) which, in part, mandates that California cities, towns, and counties plan for the housing need of residents regardless of their income. Under this mandate the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) determines the number of new homes that need to be built in each city, town, or County and how affordable those residential units need to be. As mentioned in Subsection-E above, the County has determined that the proposed facility does not consist of a residential land use under the County Zoning Ordinance. However, RHNA is managed by the HCD, whose criteria for defining a housing unit is different than that used for development projects at the County level. The HCD utilizes the census definition of a housing unit, which is as follows: BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 11 of 25 “a house, an apartment, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants do not live and eat with other persons in the structure and which have direct access from the outside of the building or through a common hall.” Based on this definition, the independent living units of the proposed facility qualify as units for the purposes of RHNA housing needs. Therefore, should the proposed project be approved, the County may count the facility’s 354 independent living units towards the County’s RHNA. However, while the facility’s independent living units may meet the definition of a housing unit for RHNA purposes, it is prudent to assume that they will only qualify as moderate or market rate units because, even with the addition of the financial assistance program, there is no regulation of pricing for specific units, which is the County’s typical approach for assuring affordability. J. Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail Connections: As proposed, the Project will include internal pedestrian trails allowing access to the various outdoor recreational areas planned in the facility. However, there is no proposed direct connection to off-site bicycle or pedestrian trails located within the Walnut Creek city limits. The City of Walnut Creek has advised that the Transportation Element of their General Plan anticipates a bicycle trail following the existing alignment of Seven Hills Ranch Road to connect to Heather Farm Park. Furthermore, City staff has requested that the project provide pedestrian and bicycle connections around the perimeter of the site and with the nearby Iron Horse and Contra Costa Canal trails. Because the subject property is located within the unincorporated County, the Project is not subject to the policies and goals of the Walnut Creek General Plan or 2011 Bicycle Plan. The project is a closed-campus CCRC, which cannot accommodate access by the public in order to protect the safety and security of its elderly tenants. In addition, the topography of the site adjoining the City of Walnut Creek boundary is quite steep. Nevertheless, following close review and consultation between the applicant and staff, the applicant has agreed to convey to the County an irrevocable offer of dedication in fee of an approximately 2.4-acre area along the westerly site boundary adjacent to the Walnut Creek Channel. If accepted by the County, the dedicated land would be used for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, though no project is contemplated at this time. Additionally, staff has recommended that the Project be conditioned to require that the applicant submit a Transportation and Parking Demand Management (TDM) Program for review and approval, which will evaluate and identify trip reduction strategies consisting of onsite and offsite pedestrian and bicycle improvements that are in BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 12 of 25 accordance with the Walnut Creek 2011 Bicycle Plan. K. Traffic and Circulation: Access to the site is currently gained from Seven Hills Ranch Road, a public road at its terminus with Walnut Boulevard that transitions to a privately maintained road east of Walnut Boulevard as it approaches the property via a 12-foot non-exclusive right of way. The applicant proposes to provide primary access to the project via an extension of Kinross Drive, located along the southeasterly site boundary. Kinross Drive is a two-lane collector street located within the Walnut Creek city limits. The extension of Kinross Drive would be constructed within a 50-foot right-of-way that was previously dedicated to the City. The extension from Kinross Drive would lead to a gated internal access road that would provide access to all project components. Per the tentative parcel map, the proposed extension of Kinross Drive will transition as it approaches the subject site from two-lanes to three-lanes, two lanes for ingress and one lane for egress. In conjunction with the preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), a Transportation Assessment was prepared by Fehr & Peers and peer reviewed by the County’s consulting traffic engineer, Hexagon (EIR Appendix P). This study concluded the Project would result in minor increases in delay at the four study intersections, but the levels of service are expected to remain unchanged with the addition of project related traffic. An internal 26-foot-wide roadway system is proposed throughout the Project to provide access to the living units, health center, and other amenities. The internal road network includes street type connections with minimum 20-foot radius curb returns. The applicant provided turning movements for both fire trucks and solid waste collection vehicles. The information shows these trucks and other service vehicles will be able to maneuver comfortably through the development. Cul-de-sac cross sections were also provided. As shown, the curb-to-curb diameter is 80 feet. The applicant proposes a mountable curb to satisfy Fire District requirements. The applicant will be responsible for verifying the process of terminating or re-aligning the non-exclusive easement, and whether neighbors and pedestrians have rights along the easement. Emergency vehicle access (EVA) would be provided via a gated, fire district compliant entrance extending from the health care center to North San Carlos Drive at the north end of the project site. The project would also improve North San Carlos Drive from the proposed EVA gate to the Heather Farm Dog Park to meet fire district standards. A supplemental gated EVA would also be provided from the internal access road to the extension of Seven Hills Ranch Road at the southwest end of the site. No project vehicular traffic would utilize either EVA for operational purposes. Except for work to BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 13 of 25 improve the EVAs and utilities running through them, and for initial access through Seven Hills Ranch Road to construct the connection to Kinross Drive, the EVAs will not be used for access by construction vehicles. For pedestrian access, on-site pedestrian facilities would be installed throughout the project site. The EVA access points located on the north and south ends of the project site would be equipped with gates allowing pedestrian and bicycle access. If requested, residents and employees could be provided with keycards allowing for access via these gates. Drainage L. Division 914 of the County Ordinance Code requires that all storm water entering and/or originating on this property be collected and conveyed, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having a definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm water to an adequate natural watercourse. A Preliminary Hydrology and Water Quality Report was included as Appendix K of the DEIR, and has been peer reviewed by the County’s EIR consultant and the County Public Works Department. The report includes a plan incorporating on-site detention measures along with a detailed analysis of pre and post project conditions that indicates post- project flows will be less than pre-project flows. Riparian corridor enhancements are also to be incorporated into the overall drainage infrastructure proposed with this project. Strict oversight and compliance with County Ordinance Code requirements will mitigate potential adverse drainage impacts resulting from this project. Given that portions of the project will drain into City of Walnut Creek stormwater facilities, those portions of the project will be subject to compliance with the City of Walnut Creek’s Minimum Drainage Design Standards, and will require approval by the County, the City, Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBOR). Creek Setback & Wetlands Protection M. A portion of the project site has been identified as a wetland and is subject to protected oversight by State and Federal agencies. This wetland area was the result of fill placed by the flood control district in conjunction with permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers at the time of construction of the Walnut Creek channel project approximately 50 years ago. This area has no definable bed and bank to channelize the minor amount of residual stormwater runoff that collects there, so it does not function as what is defined under County Code as a natural watercourse or “creek”. Nonetheless, it does provide valuable riparian habitat and measures to enhance it are being incorporated into the project. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 14 of 25 In accordance with the “Wetlands” subsection of the Conservation Element of the County General Plan, and Section 914-4.002 “Protection of Natural Watercourses” of the County Ordinance Code, development rights encumbering the identified wetlands and any additional setbacks as may be required by State or Federal regulatory agencies will be deeded to the County. Stormwater Management and Discharge Control N. A Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) is required for applications that will create and/or redevelop impervious surface area exceeding 10,000 square feet in compliance with the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) and the County’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The Project proposes approximately 17 acres of impervious surface which is above the threshold for requiring submittal of a SWCP. The applicant has included a SWCP, which has been peer reviewed by the Public Works staff and the County’s EIR consultant and deemed as preliminarily complete. Provision C.10, Trash Load Reduction, of the County’s NPDES Permit requires control of trash in local waterways. To prevent or remove trash loads from municipal storm drain systems, trash capture devices shall be installed in catch basins (excludes those located within a bioretention/stormwater treatment facility). Devices must meet the County’s NPDES Permit and approved by Public Works Department. Location must be approved by the Public Works Department. Construction O. Due to the planned off-haul of material and the construction related traffic in general, staging areas and haul routes need to be identified. Traffic control and other restrictions also need to be coordinated with all affected agencies. The applicant and their contractors are responsible to clean up any spills or debris, and repair pavement or other fixed works damaged during construction activities associated with this project. Floodplain Management P. The property does not lie within the Special Flood Hazard Area (100-year flood boundary) as designated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map. Countywide Street Light Financing Q. The subject property is not annexed into the County lighting district. The property owner will be required, as a condition of approval, to annex into the Community BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 15 of 25 Facilities District (CFD) 2010-1 formed for the Countywide Street Light Financing. Sub-regional Park Maintenance Financing R. The subject property is not annexed into the County Park Maintenance District. The property owner will be required, as a condition of approval, to request and pay all associated costs relative to annexation to County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (Contra Costa Centre Area – Park Maintenance). Area of Benefit Fee S. The applicant will need to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Central County Area of Benefit, as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Drainage Area Fee and Creek Mitigation T. A majority of the project site is located within unformed Drainage Area 44 and 65. There is currently no fee ordinance adopted by Board of Supervisors for this area. A small portion of the site lies within formed Drainage Area 8. The applicant will be required to comply with the drainage fee requirements for Drainage Area 8 as adopted by the Board of Super­visors. This fee shall be paid prior to filing of a parcel map or prior to building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. VII. COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION On October 26, 2022, the County Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Project. Following the public hearing, the Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors not certify the EIR and not approve the project. The Commission cited (A) insufficient public benefit to support approving the requested General Plan amendment. The Commission also recommended additional analysis of the following issues: (B) traffic impacts specific to the CCRC use; (C) Project impacts when compared against the alternative single-family residential development scenario; (D) the necessity of a left-turn lane from Marchbanks Drive on to Kinross Drive; (E) the necessity of additional offsite roadway improvements at the gated EVAs and possible EVA reconfiguration; and (F) impacts to existing emergency evacuation routes for Seven Hills School. Lastly, in response to the volume of public comments on the matter, the Commission also recommended that the applicant: (G) continue to meet with the adjacent Seven Hills School, and (H) provide additional section drawings to illustrate the Project’s aesthetic impacts. Below are brief staff responses to the issues raised by the Commission, and the details of any actions taken or project revisions made since the Commission hearing. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 16 of 25 A. CPC: There is insufficient public benefit to support approving the requested General Plan amendment. For example, the Project would not provide the community with additional affordable housing and would not pay park dedication fees, as would an alternative residential project on this site under the current General Plan land use designation. Staff Response: Staff recommends that the proposed Project and requested General Plan amendment would be in the public interest. The proposed Project would create 354 independent living units for seniors, plus an 100-unit health care center to provide necessary care to resident seniors and the community. The existing medium density single-family land use designation would allow for the development of up to 166 single-family residences. The current designation has applied to the site for more than 30 years, and dates to a time when the need for new housing, particularly senior housing, was less acute. The proposed Project and General Plan amendments represent a 216% increase in living units on the project site, and would provide needed housing and services to an underserved, and growing, portion of the County’s population. Additionally, since the Planning Commission hearing on the Project, the applicant has agreed to establish and implement a financial assistance program to assist lower- income households that would not otherwise have the financial means to live in the facility (COA #35), and to make community benefit payments to the County in the amount of $3,000,000, for parks and other community benefit purposes (COA #36), as described above. B. CPC: Traffic and parking analysis should be more specific to a CCRC use, rather than formulas utilized for assisted care facilities. Staff Response: As mentioned in the October 1, 2021 memorandum of Fehr & Peers included in Appendix P (Page 93) of the DEIR, Land Use Code 255 (Continuing Care Retirement Community) of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, was used in the trip generation and parking analysis for the project. The memorandum lists the ITE manual’s definition of a CCRC land use, and confirms that it “precisely fits” the nature of the proposed facility. As such, staff and the County’s EIR consultant determined that Land Use Code 255 was the most appropriate for use in the project’s trip generation and parking analysis. Furthermore, it was determined that disaggregating the individual components of the facility for individual trip generation and parking calculations would not be appropriate and would lead to a less accurate characterization of the project’s trip generation and parking demand. C. CPC: Additional comparison of the impacts from the proposed project versus those of the “Existing General Plan Development Alternative” (single-family residences) BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 17 of 25 should be provided, particularly in the areas of grading, pollution, traffic trips, fees paid, and patronage of surrounding businesses. Also, an analysis of whether blasting would be needed to complete site grading to address bedrock conditions should be conducted. Staff Response: The EIR assumed that grading necessary for the “Existing General Plan Development Alternative” would be similar to that needed for the proposed project because of the site topography. Since the grading process is the most intensive construction process and largest construction air pollutant emitter, air quality impacts were assumed to be similar between the two alternatives due to the need to provide adequate ingress/egress to the site and site circulation per current roadway design standards. Table 7.4-1 of the DEIR provides a comparison of the Daily Trips, Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and VMT per service population, and shows that the “Existing General Plan Development Alternative” would result in an increase in each of the three measurements. Depending on the type of land use, different development projects result in different demands for public services and facilities, and are therefore subject to different fees at numerous stages of the development process including, but not limited to, land use permitting, construction plan review, and responsible agency permitting. Attempting to provide this analysis for the “Existing General Plan Development Alternative” would be speculative as the applicable fees would vary due to several unknown factors including development footprint, residence sizes, construction materials, and overall structural design. Nevertheless, as discussed in the EIR, a medium density single-family housing development would have substantially greater demands for use of public facilities and services, and would be subject to County impact fees accordingly. As mentioned throughout this report, CEQA only requires that alternatives analysis include enough information to allow a meaningful evaluation and comparison with the proposed project. Providing an analysis of the applicable fees for this alternative would go significantly beyond that threshold and would have no bearing on the potential environmental impacts of the project. The 3/24/20 Geotechnical Investigation Report (Baez, DEIR Appendix G), explains on pages 3-4 and on Plate 2 that 10 test pits were excavated at depths of up to 17 feet. The materials encountered were analyzed, laboratory tested, and categorized as artificial fill, colluvium, alluvium, and bedrock. The bedrock was found to consist of “well cemented, fine to coarse grained sandstone with variable amounts of silt and gravel” with localized “minor sandy claystone beds” (localized in TP-8). The report documents these bedrock soils as being “moderately fractured” with compressive strengths of up to roughly 3,000 psi, allowing them to be excavated without blasting. The equipment expected to be utilized for excavation of these materials will include BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 18 of 25 conventional scrapers, excavators, graders, and dozers. DEIR Appendix O (Illingworth & Rodkin, Environmental Noise Assessment, 11/21/21) has taken the inclusion of this equipment into account using the FHWA’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), and conservatively assumes that all of this equipment would be operating simultaneously and at full power during a grading phase lasting for up to a year. The impacts identified were all limited to a less than significant level with prescribed mitigation. D. CPC: The necessity of a left-turn lane from Marchbanks Drive on to Kinross Drive to accommodate traffic into the site should be analyzed in further detail. Staff Response: The maximum number of vehicles that the project would add to the all-way stop controlled intersection at Kinross/Marchbanks Drive would result in less than a one-second delay (see DEIR Appendix P Intersection #4, Tables 6 & 7). While not a CEQA issue, it has also been documented in the Traffic Analysis that the intersection would continue to operate at a well-above acceptable LOS A under both existing plus Project and cumulative plus Project conditions. Therefore, no separate left-turn lane is warranted or required. E. CPC: The need for expanded offsite roadway improvements at the gated EVAs should be analyzed (e.g., improvement up to 200 feet beyond EVA gate). Also, the gated EVA configurations should be reevaluated for ease of access. Staff Response: The design adequacy of the project’s gated EVA’s falls under the purview of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD). CCCFPD has reviewed the Project plans. Neither the CCCFPD nor the project consultants have identified additional offsite roadway improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed gated EVAs . It has been further confirmed in the Final EIR that all needed improvements to the emergency access routes may be accommodated within the footprint of the existing disturbed roadway section, thereby avoiding any additional offsite impacts. The proposed project design shows that the driveway extending west past the Health Care Center and connecting to the extension of North San Carlos will be grooved concrete where needed with a maximum rise of 20 feet over run of 120 lineal feet, for a maximum slope of 16.7% (or less than the CCCFPD standard of 20%). This plan was reviewed and approved by CCCFPD, as confirmed in its October 21, 2020 letter to staff. F. CPC: Potential impacts of the project on existing emergency evacuation routes for The Seven Hills School should be evaluated. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 19 of 25 Staff Response: Design adequacy of the project’s gated EVA fall under the purview of the CCCFPD. They have had an opportunity to review the proposed project and have provided minimum width (20-feet), height (13 feet 6 inches), and turning radius (45 feet) dimensions that must be met for the designated project EVA. CCCFPD staff has advised that the proposed EVA at Seven Hills Ranch Road is not required by code if the North San Carlos EVA is compliant. Therefore, these standards will apply to the proposed EVA at North San Carlos Drive, and CCCFPD’s confirmation of the project’s compliance with these standards must be provided before the facility can initiate operation. In addition, the project has a secondary gated access to Seven Hills Ranch Road. In the event of an emergency affecting use of North San Carlos Drive, the school would be able to utilize the principal project access to Kinross Drive (an evacuation route which is currently unavailable). As noted above, the project would not utilize North San Carlos Drive for either construction or operational traffic. Therefore, the project would substantially improve emergency access by: (1) Making improvements to the school’s current access route which does not now meet fire district standards; and (2) Providing a second full fire district compliant emergency access to serve the school. G. CPC: The applicant should meet with representatives of Seven Hills School for further discussion to address the School’s concerns regarding building and retaining wall setbacks, light access, and green belt areas between land uses. Staff Response: The applicant has advised County staff that they have reached out to the firm representing Seven Hills School in an effort to resume negotiation efforts, and to present the concept of an enhanced buffer between the school buildings and the proposed adjoining one-story villa units. It is staff’s understanding that, at the time this staff report was completed, the School has not responded to the applicant’s outreach efforts. Nevertheless, the applicant has agreed to reconfigure the location of one villa (Unit #51 as shown on landscape plans) in order to provide additional buffer area and sunlight access for one of the Seven Hills School classroom buildings. To do so, the subject villa will be relocated to the location of the community garden and be structurally connected to Unit #52, to create a two-unit villa building at that location. The community garden will be relocated to the former location of Unit #51, adjacent to the property line boundary with the School. This reconfiguration is detailed on Sheet L-3 and Sheet L-13 of the “Revised Villa Configuration & Sections Exhibit” in Attachment L. The applicant has also prepared and agreed to minor revisions to the development plans that would: (1) eliminate all retaining walls in excess of 5 feet in height along BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 20 of 25 the property line boundary with the school, and (2) provide additional landscape improvements to facilitate a more complete and compatible separation between the villas and the school buildings. The revised plans include detailed cross-sections with notation of elevation levels and all proposed improvements. H. CPC: Additional section drawings should be provided to better illustrate the proposed retaining wall setbacks at the protected riparian area. Staff Response: The stepped, maximum 6-foot high retaining walls located on either side of the central perennial drainage and riparian area are detailed in the project’s Landscape and Civil Engineering drawings. Separate section details have not been provided due to the position of these walls well outside of the designated jurisdictional wetlands and riparian zone shown on the plans. The distance between these walls varies from 100 feet to well over 300 feet. The walls serve the purpose of reducing the footprint of grading to protect wetland habitat and preserve valley oak trees along this corridor. It should be noted that the project has been conditioned (COA #94) to require that the property owner relinquish development rights over the buffer area that will be required around the central drainage and wetland area. The prohibition of structural improvements within this area will ensure that the proposed retaining walls will be a safe distance from the sensitive riparian habitat. VIII. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK COMMENT LETTERS (10/26/22 & 11/15/22) On October 26, 2022, prior to the County Planning Commission hearing on the Project, the City of Walnut Creek provided comments on the Project and Final EIR. On November 15, 2022, the City provided additional comments on Project and the Final EIR. Both letters, as well as the City’s May 10, 2022, comment letter on the DEIR may be found in Attachment N. Although CEQA does not provide for a public comment period for a Final EIR, the City of Walnut Creek is a responsible agency and thus County staff is providing responses to matters raised in the letter. Below is a summary of City’s comments, followed by brief staff responses. A. Comment: Additional visual simulations, beyond those provided in the EIR, should be provided for further evaluation of potential aesthetic impacts. More specifically, City staff requests simulations viewing the project site from adjacent private properties within the Walnut Creek city limits. Staff Response: As mentioned in Master Response 5 of the FEIR, the three visual simulations provided in the EIR represent existing publicly available views of the project site as seen from Kinross Drive, Heather Farm Park, and Cherry Lane. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines, these simulations are most representative of public viewpoints, and not of viewpoints from individual private properties. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 21 of 25 Despite the adequacy and accuracy of the provided the visual simulations to address the environmental impact issues under CEQA, at the specific request of the City of Walnut Creek, the applicant commissioned a set of five supplemental professional visual simulations based on photographs taken from the three private streets adjoining the easterly site boundary within the Heather Farm Townhouse development, at the intersection of Kinross Drive and Marchbanks Drive, and along the extension of North San Carlos Drive further to the east of the project boundary. The supplemental photo simulations are provided in Attachment K. B. Comment: The proposed onsite stormwater detention basin and associated 15-inch drainage pipe within North San Carlos Drive is not the City-preferred design. Alternate solutions previously discussed with the applicant should be explored. If alternat solutions are infeasible, then the proposed design will require a perpetual maintenance agreement with the City, CCWD, and USBOR. Staff Response: The County Public Works Department has conducted a review of the submitted drainage plan and has determined the design to be compliant with applicable County standards. There is no requirement for an applicant to provide alternate drainage designs for County consideration if a compliant design has already been submitted. Based on the review by Public Works staff and the hydrology and water quality analysis in the EIR, County staff has determined the proposed drainage design and plans are appropriate for the Project. Alternate drainage design plans were not provided to the County and were not considered for use in the project. Thus conditioning the project to require analysis of the alternates is not warranted. As reflected in the Final EIR, the applicant has agreed to the City’s request that the proposed storm drain line to be constructed within the extension of North San Carlos Drive be perpetually maintained at the expense of the project. The applicant has also advised County staff that they have met in the field with City engineering staff and CCWD staff, and are open to considering other drainage designs as part of the more detailed improvement plan engineering. Condition of Approval No. 90 references that storm drain infrastructure that traverses or directly discharges to facilities within the City of Walnut Creek will be subject to compliance with the City of Walnut Creek’s Minimum Drainage Design Standards, and that permits, plan review, and inspections shall be coordinated with the City. Any revisions to proposed drainage design is subject to review and approval by the County (COA#91), and may also require additional CEQA review if the potential for additional environmental impacts is identified. C. Comment: The current drainage design does not demonstrate that it can detain waters leaving the site in a manner that ensures peak post-development flow does not exceed the pre-development conditions because the project is altering the BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 22 of 25 drainage pattern. Staff Response: The County Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted drainage design and associated hydrology reports for compliance with the County ordinance and other applicable drainage standards. The Public Works Department has provided preliminary approval of the design as the design is consistent with applicable code and staff’s analysis shows that post-development flows will not exceed that of the exiting site condition. Furthermore, Public Works staff is confident that the project site is of a size wherein minor expansions to the size of proposed detention basins can be made, if at all necessary, to ensure that all stormwater originating on the property is collected and treated before leaving the site in compliance with County and City standards.. D. Comment: Response #2.7 in the FEIR does not answer the questions raised in the City’s prior comments in the DEIR. Staff Response: No exceptions to County drainage standards have been requested by the applicant, nor are any proposed. The County requires that all stormwater runoff entering and originating on the property be collected and conveyed without diversion to adequate downstream receiving waters. During the final design phase of the project, the fine details of the drainage infrastructure improvements will be reviewed for compliance with these requirements. In addition, conditions of approval have been included requiring offsite improvements within the City to be reviewed and approved by the City as part of the improvement plan engineering phase, and prior to construction. E. Comment: The City requests that pedestrian and bicycle connections around the perimeter of the site be provided to facilitate future connectivity to Heather Farm Park from the Iron Horse Trail and other locations. Staff Response: The applicant has agreed to convey to the County an irrevocable offer of dedication in fee of an approximately 2.4-acre area along the westerly site boundary adjacent to the Walnut Creek Channel. If accepted by the County, the dedicated land would be used for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, though no project is contemplated at this time. Staff has included a new recommended condition of approval (COA #71) regarding the dedication, and Attachment P depicts the area to be offered by the applicant for dedication. F. Comment: The Project Alternatives section of the EIR does not fully analyze the potential impacts of the “Roadway Redesign Alternative” versus the “New Development Alternative”. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 23 of 25 Staff Response: CEQA requires that “the EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed project.” CEQA does not require that the impacts of a particular alternative be compared specifically against the impacts of other alternatives. Section 7.4.2.2 of the DEIR provides that when compared to the proposed project, the Existing General Plan Development Alternative would result in daily trips increase of 477 trips, Daily VMT increase of 7,394 miles, and a VMT per service population increase of 28.6 miles. The DEIR goes on to state that the Existing General Plan Development Alternative would result in same or similar less than significant impacts (after mitigations) in the remaining impact areas. The revised version of Section 7.4.2.3 of the EIR clearly indicates that the Roadway Redesign Alternative could reduce impacts to riparian woodland and wetland habitat on one portion of the site; but that this alternative would potentially result in increased impacts to jurisdictional drainage and riparian habitat in the southwest region of the site, increased impacts to tree habitat along Seven Hills Ranch Road, and impacts from increased drainage demand. The discussion continues on to mention that this alternative would result in the same or similar less than significant impacts (after mitigations) related to air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and tribal cultural resources. The EIR is consistent with the CEQA Guidelines requirement of including sufficient information to allow a meaningful evaluation and comparison of each alternative with the proposed project. G. Comment: Response #2.13 in the FEIR does not address impacts to Walnut Creek residents from construction traffic. Staff Response: Site grading and preparation is the phase of project construction that has the most potential for creating construction traffic that will impact Walnut Creek residents. This is as a result of large earth moving equipment operating at the site and trucks removing the anticipated 75,000 cubic yards of soil and rock from the site. However, while the maximum total combined construction period for this project is four years, all site grading and site preparation activities will be completed within the first nine to twelve months of construction. Therefore, after the initial twelve months of construction, the vertical construction phase will begin and construction traffic both on- and off-site will be significantly reduced, and construction noise will be substantially reduced. Following completion of grading operations, construction of the independent living units would be completed in the next 22 months (DEIR page 24), and the Health Care Center could take up to 18 additional months thereafter. Based on this, the construction traffic impacts on Walnut Creek residents will be significantly less than that anticipated by City staff. BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 24 of 25 Nevertheless, staff has supplemented the originally proposed COA's related to construction impacts with additional detailed provisions that: a) further define the necessary components of the required Traffic Control Plan, b) clarify how pavement conditions on access routes will be monitored and restored as necessary, and c) require consultation with the City (COA #102-105). H. Comment: The City requests that County Park Impact Fees be imposed on the independent living units, or that the project be conditioned to address impacts to the City’s park facilities that such fees would otherwise be expected to address. Staff Response: As detailed above, County staff has determined that the independent living units are an amenity of the institutional use and not residential units under the County Zoning Ordinance. Based on this determination, the independent living units of the project would not be subject to fees under the Park Dedications (Division 920) ordinance. In addition, the Project includes extensive onsite park and recreation amenities built for use by elderly residents and their guests including an aquatic center, multiple dog parks, bocce courts, tennis/pickleball courts, a gardening center and walking trails. The applicant has further offered land dedication in fee of an approximately 2.4-acre area along the westerly site boundary adjacent to the Walnut Creek Channel. If accepted by the County, the dedicated land would be used for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, though no project is contemplated at this time. Further, the applicant has agreed to make community benefit payments totaling $3,000,000, which may be used to establish or maintain parks or trails, at the County’s sole discretion. The benefits would be specific to the local community, including areas within the unincorporated Contra Costa County and the City of Walnut Creek near the Project. Staff recommends that the County coordinate with the City of Walnut Creek in the allocation and expenditure of the community benefit payments funds received from the applicant. I. Comment: Roadway improvements, including protected left-turn signal phasing, are needed at the Ygnacio Valley Rd./Marchbanks Dr.-Tampico and Ygnacio Valley Rd./Marchbanks Dr.-La Casa Via intersections. Staff Response: City has characterized Ygnacio Valley Road as a “High Injury corridor”, and therefore suggested consideration of protected left-turn phasing at Ygnacio at Marchbanks-Tampico and Ygnacio at Kinross-LaCasa (Study Intersections 1 and 2). This issue of project traffic safety impacts is addressed in DEIR Appendix P (Fehr & Peers, 7/21/21) on pages 18-21 (and in Tables 10 through 14), where it is explained that: (a) no fatal or severe collisions were reported for BOS – November 29, 2022 Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project Page 25 of 25 either intersection; and (b) these intersections have actual collision frequencies which are far less than predicted using the modeling referenced by the City. The report concludes that these intersections are relatively safe compared to similar facilities nationwide. In particular, Table 13 shows that the actual per year collisions (none of which were fatal or serious) at both intersections were each less than one- third the level predicted for County arterial roadways using the modeling referenced in the City’s letter. As shown in DEIR Appendix P, Table 7, the Level of Service at these signalized intersections will not decline with the project, and will continue to operate at Level C. Therefore, implementation of the project does not warrant any additional improvements or modifications to these intersections. J. Comment: Improvements within N. San Carlos cannot all be accommodated within the ROW and will result in impacts to trees, habitat, and wetlands. Plans are also needed to show that the EVA alignment along N. San Carlos meets the required 20- foot minimum width and 45-foot minimum outside radius. Staff Response: Sheet C5.0 of the submitted civil plans indicates that all proposed sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain improvements can be accommodated within the existing paved portions of the North San Carlos Drive right-of-way adjacent to existing underground utilities. There are existing mature trees adjacent to the paved roadway, which have not been proposed for removal or alteration as part of the project. The comment mentions impacts to habitat and wetlands, which appears to be in relation to alternate drainage designs previously discussed with the applicant. As mentioned above in this report, the applicant has not submitted plans for the County’s consideration of an alternate drainage design, and those alternatives are not being considered as part of this project approval. IX. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors certify the environmental impact report prepared for the Project and approve the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project. The proposed congregate care/senior housing (CC) general plan land use designation is in the public interest as California is in the midst of a housing crisis and redesignation to CC allows for development of 354 independent living units for seniors, a 216% increase over the base single family medium density land use designation. The proposed project is generally well-suited for the site and the inclusion of health care services and community amenities in the project design will be convenient for future residents and help this proposed new development be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. In addition, the proposed project and conditions of approval have been refined to include supplemental public benefits and additional protections for neighbors and all required findings can be made. Attachment B CEQA and Project Findings Page 1 of 18 FINDINGS FOR COUNTY FILES #CDGP20-00001, #CDRZ20-03255, #CDMS20-00007, #CDDP20-03018, and #CDLP20-02038 (SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY) CEQA FINDINGS I. In General: CEQA Requirements A. The County is the lead agency for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project (“Project”) for purposes of environmental review. Having received, reviewed, and considered the Project’s EIR and other relevant information in the administrative record of proceedings, the County Board of Supervisors (“Board”) hereby finds and adopts the following findings in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Gov’t Code § 21000 et seq.), the CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Pub. Res. § 15000 et seq.), and sections of the County Ordinance pertaining to CEQA (collectively, “CEQA”). B. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091, no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) has been certified, that identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out, unless the public agency makes one or more findings for each of those significant impacts that is also accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings, which must be supported by substantial evidence in the record, are as follows: 1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment; 2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency; 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report; For those impacts that cannot be mitigated below a level of significance, the public agency is required to find that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. II. Procedural Recitals A. Based on the nature and scope of the Project accompanied by substantial evidence, the County determined that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, an environmental impact report (“EIR”) was prepared, noticed, published, Page 2 of 18 circulated, reviewed, and completed in full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as follows: 1) A Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) of an EIR for review and comment by responsible and trustee agencies and other interested agencies, organizations, and individuals was circulated by the County from July 23, 2021, through August 23, 2021. 2) A scoping session was held on August 16, 2021, at which interested agencies, organizations, and individuals had an opportunity to submit oral and written comments pertaining to environmental concerns related to the project and the proposed scope of environmental review. 3) Pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21161 and 21092, and CEQA Guidelines sections 15085 and 15087(b), on March 11, 2022, a Notice of Completion (“NOC”)/Notice of Availability (“NOA”) document and copies of the Draft EIR (“DEIR”) were distributed to the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse, those public agencies that have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project or that exercise authority over resources that may be affected by the Project, and to other interested agencies, organizations and individuals as required by applicable law. The NOC/NOA document was also mailed to all owners or property located within 300 feet of the project site, occupants of property adjacent to the Project Site, to others who requested notice, and the NOC/NOA was published in the East Bay Times newspaper pursuant to applicable noticing requirements. The NOC/NOA document stated that the County had completed the DEIR and that electronic copies of the DEIR (including all appendices) were available for viewing and download at: http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/SpiekerSenior and that hard copies were available at the Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553. These documents were also available in hard copy at the Walnut Creek Library, Office of County Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, and Office of County Supervisor Candace Andersen. 4) The County received and evaluated numerous comments from interested public agencies, organizations, and individuals who reviewed the DEIR. The County has responded to all comments on the DEIR, all of which are reflected in the FEIR (as that term is defined below). 5) The FEIR was prepared and published on October 11, 2022, and consisted of an edited list of revisions to the DEIR and responses to comments on the DEIR. In accordance with applicable CEQA requirements, the responses to comments address all comments on environmental issues received during the public review and comment period for the DEIR. 6) For purposes of these Findings, the Project EIR consists of the DEIR, the FEIR, and all appendices attached to the DEIR and FEIR, and the remaining relevant portions of the Page 3 of 18 administrative record for this matter. The Board finds that the Project EIR was prepared, published, circulated, reviewed, and considered in accordance with the applicable requirements of CEQA, and constitutes an accurate, adequate, objective, and complete EIR. This Board has exercised its independent judgment and analysis in evaluating the Project EIR. In exercising this judgment, this Board has reviewed and considered the Project EIR and other relevant information in the administrative record, including, without limitation, public testimony. III. Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and MMRP A. The Project EIR concludes that implementation of the Project could result in potentially significant and adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, the County has made findings with respect to these impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091. The findings summarize the environmental determinations about the Project’s significant impacts before and after mitigation and summarize the Project’s individual and cumulative impacts. B. This Board adopts, and incorporates as enforceable, conditions of approval of the Project, the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) (see attachment), which has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15097. This Board adopts this MMRP as it pertains to the Project, and finds that the mitigation measures set forth in the MMRP will reduce or avoid the potentially significant impacts of the Project to the extent feasible for the reasons described in the Project EIR. In the event a mitigation measure recommended in the Project EIR has inadvertently been omitted from the MMRP, this Board hereby adopts such mitigation measure as stated in the Project EIR and incorporates said mitigation measure in these Findings by reference. C. The mitigation measures as set forth in the MMRP are being made enforceable as conditions of approval. Accordingly, changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the Project EIR. IV. Project Alternatives A. Background: In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the Project EIR contains a comparative impact assessment of alternatives to the Project. The primary purpose of this analysis is to provide decision makers, interested agencies, organizations, and individuals, with information about a reasonable range of potentially feasible Project alternatives, which could avoid or reduce any of the Project’s significant adverse environmental effects. B. Summary of Reasonable Range of Alternatives and Basis for Rejection: For the reasons documented in the Project EIR and summarized below, this Board hereby rejects each of Page 4 of 18 the alternatives and approves the Project, based on the specific legal, economic, and other considerations that make each of the below-identified alternatives infeasible. 1) Project Objectives • Approval of all licensing for the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) from the State of California Department of Social Services to provide lifetime occupancy and support services for project residents. • Combine independent living, assisted living, and nursing services as a complete and sustainable living arrangement for lifetime occupancy by community residents. • Provide progressive care services for CCRC residents from independent living units with associated amenities and dining options to assisted living, skilled nursing, and memory support. • Create a high-quality CCRC living environment with a wide range of quality amenities and services for persons aged 60 years and over, with a sufficient number of independent living units to support those amenities and services. • Design, build, and operate a high-quality CCRC on an infill site, to be compatible with the surrounding community, and consistent with State standards. • Contribute to greater livability for senior citizens by incorporating the following design and planning principles: safety and security, recreation and cultural activities, walkability/accessibility, onsite management and care, and transportation, including shuttle service to local restaurants, shopping, and health services. • Offer a retirement community option not currently provided in Contra Costa County, which includes a comprehensive program and campus to allow potential residents and family members to plan for retirement. • Provide an onsite health care center licensed to provide assisted living, skilled nursing services, and memory support to residents of the CCRC, and to nonresidents as space permits. 2) Summary of Alternatives Evaluated • No Project Alternative: Under this alternative, the Project would not be constructed, and the project site would remain in its current condition, with the existing building reoccupied. There also would be no enhancement of the perennial drainage and wetland areas in the central portion of the project site. • Existing General Plan Development Alternative: Under this alternative, the subject property is redeveloped in a manner that is consistent with the existing Single- Family Residential, Medium Density (SM) General Plan designation. Under this designation a residential density between 3.0 and 4.9 single-family dwelling units per acre would be allowed. With consideration of an additional 15 percent density as provided for under the County’s Affordable Housing Ordinance, approximately 166 single-family residential units could be constructed at the site. Based on this Page 5 of 18 anticipated unit count, an estimated 482 residents would be housed in the development. • Roadway Redesign Project: Under this alternative, the Project’s extension of Kinross Drive at the southern boundary would be removed and the main entrance to the project site would be relocated to Seven Hills Ranch Road. Currently Seven Hills Ranch Road between Walnut Boulevard and the project site is approximately 17- feet wide with no markings or sidewalks, and thus would need to be widened to a 50-foot right-of-way to accommodate the required 33-foot curb-to-curb roadway and 6-foot sidewalks. To accomplish this the project sponsor would need to procure portions of the adjacent private land on either side of Seven Hills Ranch Road. All other aspects of the proposed project would remain the same, including the land use totals, location of internal access roads, and the location and design of proposed buildings. 3) Alternatives Rejected from Further Consideration: In addition to the alternatives described above, one additional alternative was initially considered, but rejected from further consideration for the reasons summarized below. • Location Alternative: The CEQA Guidelines encourage consideration of an alternative site where significant effects of the project may be avoided or substantially lessened. Only alternate locations that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts, and meet most of the project objectives need to be considered. For the Project, it is assumed that a location alternative would need to be: 1) approximately 30 acres in size; 2) located in central Contra Costa County; 3) located on an infill site; served by available infrastructure and adjacent commercial amenities; and 4) immediately available. There are multiple sites in Contra Costa County that are similar in size and that would qualify as infill sites. However, location alternatives were rejected because the potentially suitable sites would not reduce the construction noise impacts related to the Project’s size, duration of construction, and proximity of nearby sensitive receptors. Additionally, the construction-related criteria air pollutant impacts would also not be lessened because construction would also occur on these sites in a similar manner. Lastly, these sites are not controlled by the applicant. PROJECT FINDINGS V. General Plan Consistency A. Overall General Plan Consistency The County General Plan consists of nine separate elements, all of which may play a role in determining a project’s consistency with the overall document. Project characteristics such as location, duration, and type all play a role in which elements, policies, goals, and Page 6 of 18 implementation measures are applicable in aiding County staff and the public analyze a project’s consistency with the overall document. The project consists of constructing a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) on a largely undeveloped site in an urban area of Central Contra Costa County. Because this is a development project, the Land Use Element and Growth Management Elements play a primary role in determining consistency. With the underutilized condition of the property and its substantially developed surroundings, the Transportation and Circulation, and Conservation Elements are also closely analyzed. Lastly, the anticipated 4-year construction duration combined with the proximity of sensitive land uses such as a school and residential developments warrants in-depth analysis of the General Plan’s Noise Element. Despite the importance and applicability of policies and goals within the elements mentioned above, each of the nine General Plan Elements were considered during staff’s review of the project. Consistency with policies and goals of the Land Use and Growth Management elements are summarized below, but a more detailed discussion of the project’s consistency with the applicable policies and goals of each General Plan Element is provided in the Regulatory Framework and Impact Discussion sections of the DEIR, and also within the text of Master Resonse-1 of the FEIR. B. Land Use Element Consistency 1) The project will implement and promote the following Land Use Element goals. i. To coordinate land use with circulation, development of other infrastructure facilities, and protection of agriculture and open space, and to allow growth and the maintenance of the county's quality of life. In such an environment, all residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and agricultural activities may take place in safety, harmony, and to mutual advantage. (3-A) ii. To provide opportunities for increasing the participation of Contra Costa County in the economic and cultural growth of the region, and to contribute to, as well as benefit from, the continued growth in importance of the Bay Region and the State of California. (3-B) iii. To encourage aesthetically and functionally compatible development, which reinforces the physical character and desired images of the county. (3-C) iv. To provide for a range and distribution of land uses that serve all social and economic segments of the county and its subregions. (3-D) v. To permit urban development only in locations of the county within identified outer boundaries of urban development where public service delivery systems that meet applicable performance standards are provided or committed. (3-F) Page 7 of 18 vi. To coordinate effectively the land use policies of the County General Plan with those plans adopted by the cities and special service districts. (3-I) vii. To encourage a development pattern that promotes the individuality and unique character of each community in the county. (3-J) viii. As feasible, areas experiencing rapid urban growth shall be developed so as to provide a balance of new residential and employment opportunities. (3-3) ix. New development within unincorporated areas of the county may be approved, providing growth management standards and criteria are met or can be assured of being met prior to issuance of building permits in accordance with the Growth Management Program. (3-5) x. Development of all urban uses shall be coordinated with provision of essential community services or facilities including, but not limited to, roads, law enforcement and fire protection services, schools, parks, sanitary facilities, water, and flood control. (3-6) xi. Infilling of already developed areas shall be encouraged. Proposals that would prematurely extend development into areas lacking requisite services, facilities, and infrastructure shall be opposed. In accommodating new development, preference shall generally be given to vacant or underused sites within urbanized areas, which have necessary utilities installed with available remaining capacity, before undeveloped suburban lands are utilized. (3-8) xii. Flexibility in the design of projects shall be encouraged in order to enhance scenic qualities and provide for a varied development pattern. (3-18) xiii. Existing residential neighborhoods shall be protected from incompatible land uses and traffic levels exceeding adopted service standards. (3-27) 2) The facility will be located within a Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC) General Plan land use designation, which is the only designation that allows for such a use. Unlike the other land use designations categorized as residential in the Land Use element, the CC designation does not include standards for development characteristics such as unit density, population density, building height, or lot size. Instead, each CC land use designation is adopted with criteria that is unique to and based upon the individual project site. Since the project site is currently within an SM designation and will be designated as CC under the current modification to the General Plan Land Use Map, there is no potential for the project conflicting with pre-existing development standards established under a previously adopted CC designation. Page 8 of 18 C. Growth Management Element Consistency The purpose of the Growth Management Element is to establish policies and standards for traffic levels of service and performance standards for fire, police, parks, sanitary facilities, water, and flood control to ensure generally that public facilities consistent with adopted standards are provided. 1) Traffic: The Project is located within an urban area of the County with existing paved roadways and traffic control measures such as traffic signals, street signs, and roadway markings. With construction of the Kinross Drive extension, adequate access to and from the site will be available via public collector and arterial roadways such as Marchbanks Drive and Ygnacio Valley Road. As discussed in more detail in the project EIR, six roadway intersections in the area of the project site were analyzed and it was found that none of the studied intersections’ performance would drop a Level of Service grade or experience an additional delay greater than five seconds. 2) Water: The County must determine if capacity exists within the existing water system to support the project. The County’s determination on this matter is largely based on information made available from consultation with the responsible water agency, the applicant, and other sources. Available data indicates that the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) would have approximately 700 acre-feet of excess water for the year three multiple-dry year scenario, and up to approximately 69,300 acre-feet of excess water for the average year scenario, both through 2035. The project’s total water demand was estimated at approximately 128 acre-feet per year. Therefore, the additional water demand created by the project could be accommodated by CCWD. 3) Sanitary Sewer: The County must determine if capacity exists within the existing sanitary sewer system to support the project. The County’s determination on this matter is largely based on information made available from consultation with the responsible sewer agency, the applicant, and other sources. The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides wastewater services to the project site. CCCSD’s treatment plant currently has a treatment capacity of 54 million gallons per day, and currently treats an average of approximately 34 million gallons of wastewater per day. The Project has been anticipated at generating a net increase in wastewater treatment demand of approximately 97,486 gallons per day, which is only 0.5 percent of the treatment plant’s available capacity of 20 million gallons per day. 4) Fire: The Growth Management Element requires that a fire station be located within 1.5 miles of all developments in urban areas. The Project is consistent with this standard as Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Fire Station No. 1 is located approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the site at 1330 Civic Drive. Furthermore, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District has had an opportunity to review the project and there has been no indication that additional or expanded fire station facilities would be necessary to support the Project. Page 9 of 18 5) Police: The Growth Management Element requires that the standard of having 155 square feet of Sheriff station area and support facilities per 1,000 members of the population, be maintained in the unincorporated County. It is anticipated that the CCRC will accommodate approximately 560 residents, which is well below the 1,000- person threshold. Therefore, no expansion of the Valley Station would be required to maintain consistency with the station area standard. Furthermore, the County Sheriff was provided an opportunity to review the Project and there has been no indication that additional or expanded Sheriff station facilities would be necessary to accommodate the Project. 6) Parks: The Growth Management Element requires that the standard of having 3 acres of neighborhood parks per 1,000 members of the population, be maintained in the unincorporated County. It is anticipated that the CCRC facility will accommodate approximately 560 residents, which would require that approximately 1.6 acres of neighborhood parks be provided to serve the increased demand created by the Project. The applicant is not proposing new park facilities as part of the Project, but the Project includes extensive onsite park and recreation amenities built for use by elderly residents and their guests including an aquatic center, multiple dog parks, bocce courts, tennis/pickleball courts, a gardening center and walking trails. These areas account for approximately 2.9 acres of designated outdoor recreational area for the residents of the facility, which exceed the 1.6 acres required for consistency with the Growth Management Element standard. The applicant has further offered to the County a land dedication in fee of an approximately 2.4-acre area along the westerly site boundary adjacent to the Walnut Creek Channel. If accepted by the County, the dedicated land would be used for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, though no project is contemplated at this time. D. General Plan Map Amendment 1) Required Finding: Is adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment consistent with the provisions of the County’s Urban Limit Line as outlined in Measure L-2006? Project Finding: Adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment (GPA) is consistent with the provisions of the Urban Limit Line (ULL). No change to the ULL would occur and the Project does not require extension of urban services beyond the ULL. The subject site is located inside the ULL, and therefore may be developed with “urban” and “non-urban” uses, as defined in the 2005-2020 Contra Costa County General Plan. The proposed land use designation, Congregate Care (CC), is urban. 2) Required Finding: Would adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment result in a violation of the County’s 65/35 Land Preservation Standard? Page 10 of 18 Project Finding: Adoption of the proposed GPA will not result in a violation of the 65/35 Land Preservation Standard (the “65/35 Standard”), established through voter adoption of Measure C-1990 and reaffirmed through adoption of Measure L-2006. Under the 65/35 Standard, no more than 35 percent of the land in the county may be developed with urban uses and at least 65 percent of the land must be preserved for non-urban uses such as agriculture, open space, parks, wetlands, etc. The existing land use designation for the subject site, Single-Family Residential Medium Density (SM), is an urban land use designation. No non-urban land use designations are present on- site. The proposed CC land use designation is also an urban designation. Therefore, the percentage of land with urban and non-urban designations will not change as a result of the GPA. 3) Required Finding: Is adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment compliant with the provisions of Measure J-2004, the Contra Costa Growth Management Program, and related Contra Costa Transportation Authority resolutions? Project Finding: The Project complies with the objectives and requirements of Measure J-2004, the Contra Costa Growth Management Program (GMP), and related Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) resolutions. The CCTA GMP Implementation Guide (2021) sets forth procedures for local agency consultation and evaluation of impacts related to proposed GPAs. The Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project would generate fewer than 100 a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips and would not impact a Route of Regional Significance. The project is therefore exempt from the GMP GPA Review Process. Regardless, the DEIR was referred to TRANSPAC, the Regional Transportation Planning Committee for Central Contra Costa County, for review and comment. No comments were submitted. 4) Required Finding: Would adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment cause the General Plan to become internally inconsistent, in violation of Government Code Section 65300.5? Project Finding: Adoption of the proposed GPA will not cause the General Plan to become internally inconsistent. The General Plan comprises an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of policy governing land use in the unincorporated areas of the county. The existing SM land use designation allows for single-family residential development across the subject site. The proposed CC designation allows for more intense development over the same area. Changing the land use designation from SM to CC does not affect or conflict with the policies applicable to the site, nor does it otherwise amend the General Plan. Page 11 of 18 5) Required Finding: Would adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment be in the public interest, as required under Government Code Section 65358(a)? Project Finding: Adoption of the proposed GPA is in the public interest. The existing SM land use designation allows for development of approximately 112 single-family homes, and possibly up to 166 homes with a density bonus consideration. The SM designation was applied to the subject site over 30 years ago, when demand for new housing, particularly senior housing, was less acute. California is in the midst of a housing crisis and redesignation of the site to CC allows for development of 354 independent living units for seniors (a 216 percent increase over the base SM density), plus 100 assisted living units, including 33 skilled nursing beds and 23 memory care units. The additional housing and associate services provided by the proposed Project are in the public interest. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to provide additional public benefits beyond those benefits derived directly from the Project. The applicant has agreed to establish and implement a financial assistance program whereby the facility operator would establish an annuity in an initial amount of $2,000,000 for the purpose of providing ongoing subsidies to lower-income households that would not otherwise have the financial means to live in the facility. The subsidies will assist lower-income households with a program target occupancy rate of 10% of the independent living units. The program would prioritize Very-Low- and Lower-Income Households. The applicant has also agreed to enter into a community benefits agreement with the County whereby the applicant will make community benefit payments totaling $3,000,000 over ten years for, at the County’s sole discretion, establishing or maintaining parks or trails; maintaining or beautifying roadways, rights-of-way, or open space; or establishing, maintaining, or beautifying other community improvements. 6) Required Finding: Would adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment result in an exceedance of the annual limit on amendments specified under Government Code Section 65358(b)? Project Finding: The mandatory elements of the General Plan may be amended up to four times each calendar year. The proposed GPA affects the Land Use Element, a mandatory element, and is the fourth amendment to that element for 2022. VI. Rezoning Findings A. Required Finding: The change proposed will substantially comply with the General Plan Project Finding: The project-specific P-1 zoning district will allow for the construction of a self-contained CCRC consisting of 354 independent living units for residents, a 100-unit Page 12 of 18 health center, maintenance building, and associated indoor and outdoor amenities. The facility will be located within a Congregate Care-Senior Housing (CC) land use designation, which is very restrictive in that it only allows for the establishment of senior housing land uses. Additionally, the associated project-specific P-1 district and project conditions of approval identify and restrict the ancillary uses and amenities allowed as part of the facility (e.g., clubhouse, swimming pool, alcohol sales, tennis courts) to ensure continued consistency with the General Plan. B. Required Finding: The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within the district, and to uses authorized in adjacent districts. Project Finding: All of the uses authorized within the district are compatible with others in the district because they are all interdependent in the overall goal of providing long-term care to seniors. The primary elements of the facility are very codependent in that the seniors entering into a care contract with the facility operator rely on living accommodations nearby the health center. Having living accommodations and health care services in close proximity to each other improves ease and convenience in obtaining care when needed. The maintenance building provides facilities for laundry, trash collection, HVAC control, and overall site maintenance services that are vital for the successful daily operation of the facility. The project is also compatible with the single-and multi-family residential uses in the adjacent County and city zoning districts. The independent living units of the facility will function similarly to the residences on adjacent properties by providing living accommodations for County residents. Additionally, the health center will provide long- term medical care to residents in the area, similarly to how medical services are provided to the surrounding community by the nearby John Muir Medical Center. C. Required Finding: Community need has been demonstrated for the use proposed, but this does not require demonstration of future financial success. Project Finding: The Housing Element of the County General Plan indicates that approximately 13.9 percent of the total population in unincorporated Contra Costa County is comprised of seniors (persons 65 years and older). Furthermore, nationwide population trends indicate that as the baby boom generation ages, the demand for specialized developments such as assisted living or active adult communities will grow. These development types are designed and typically better suited to address some of the primary concerns of senior households such as limited income, physical disabilities/limitations, and limited income. As proposed, the facility will consist of a health care facility and independent living units all in one development, which creates a convenient circumstance for residents wherein health care services are readily available in proximity to their place of residence. Furthermore, facility residents sign a care contract with the facility operator, which allows seniors the option of securing long-term health care at a pre-determined or more predictable cost. Page 13 of 18 VII. Planned Unit (P-1) District Findings A. Required Finding: The applicant intends to start construction within two and one-half years from effective date of zoning change and plan approval. Project Finding: Representatives of the project sponsor have conveyed an intent to start construction as quickly as feasible, and within two years of the effective date of the entitlement approvals. However, the anticipated construction date is subject to obtaining all necessary approvals from the City of Walnut Creek and other responsible agencies. B. Required Finding: The proposed planned unit development is consistent with the County General Plan. This development project has been through an in-depth review process that involved the review and participation of various County departments and divisions that coordinate with the Department of Conservation and Development to implement the General Plan. Advance planning staff of the CDD provided assistance in reviewing the proposed development to ensure that the project is consistent with long-range goals and policies detailed in the Land Use and Growth Management Elements. A more in-depth discussion of the project’s consistency with the General Plan is provided in the General Plan Consistency portion of these findings and also within the impact discussions of the DEIR and Master Response-1 section of the FEIR. C. Required Finding: In the case of residential development, it will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and community. Project Finding: The project does not include a residential element. D. Required Finding: In the case of the commercial development, it is needed at the proposed location to provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed, and that traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed center, or will be obviated by presently projected improvements and by demonstrable provisions in the plan for proper entrances and exits, and by internal provisions for traffic and parking, and that the development will be an attractive and efficient center which will fit harmoniously into and will have no adverse effects upon the adjacent or surrounding development. Project Finding: There is a growing senior population in Central Contra Costa County, which mostly comprised of homeowners living in single-family homes. As this population ages, the demand for downsized housing or specialized housing has resulted in an increased demand for specialized services and accommodations for those senior households. More specifically, there is an increased need for health care on a long-term basis and that is at a more predictable cost. Page 14 of 18 The facility will consist of an internal circulation system comprised of internal roads, sidewalks, and pedestrian trails providing access to all primary elements and amenities of the development. Both on- and off-street parking will be provided for residents and their guests, and shuttle services will be available to limited off-site locations. E. Required Finding: In the case of proposed industrial development, it is fully in conformity with the applicable performance standards, and will constitute an efficient and well- organized development, with adequate provisions for railroad and/or truck access service and necessary storage, and that such development will have no adverse effect upon adjacent or surrounding development. Project Finding: The project does not include an industrial element. F. Required Finding: The development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions from the normal application of this code. Project Finding: Pursuant to the Land Use Element of the County General Plan, the CC land use designation is the only designation in which a CCRC use is allowed. Furthermore, Table 3-5 (“Consistency Between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance”) identifies the P-1 district as the only zoning district that is consistent with the CC designation. The Project EIR provides detailed discussion of the site’s steep slopes and existing sensitive biological resources that limit development areas at the site and that require the use of multiple strategic design and engineering techniques such as tiered retaining walls and bridge crossings. When the existing site challenges are considered in conjunction with the quantity and quality of buildings, infrastructure, and amenities necessary to operate a high-quality CCRC, it is clear that flexibility from the normal application of the zoning code is required. VIII.Tentative Map Findings A. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall not approve a tentative map unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans required by law. Project Finding: The Project’s tentative map application has been reviewed along with all other submitted plans for compliance with applicable regulations in effect on the date the application was deemed complete. The development shown on the tentative map, as a whole, is consistent with the General Plan as explained in further detail in the project EIR and the General Plan Consistency section of these findings. There is no specific plan that covers the Project Site. Page 15 of 18 B. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall make findings as required concerning the fulfillment of construction requirements Project Finding: All structures within the facility will be subject to building codes in effect at the time the permits are issued. Compliance with and implementation of these building codes will be enforced via building plan check and field inspections administered by staff of the County Building Inspection Division. The tentative map has been conditioned to require the undergrounding of all new and existing utility distributions within the 30-acre Development area. Lastly, the project has been conditioned in a manner that requires the Applicant to complete most of the construction requirements (i.e. roadway improvements, drainage improvements, utility extensions) prior to issuance of building permits. IX. Land Use Permit Findings (Alcohol Sales) A. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the County. Project Finding: The applicant proposes to sell alcohol as one of the services provided at the clubhouse located within the large apartment-style building. The manner in which the alcoholic beverages are stored, served, and sold will be monitored and managed by agencies such as the Contra Costa Health Services Department, which significantly reduces the potential for health hazards. In addition, the facility operator will be required to obtain and maintain a license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, who administer and enforce compliance with the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. As conditioned, the sale of alcohol withing the clubhouse will be administered in compliance with the standards of the local and State agencies listed above, which would in turn ensure that the proposed activity will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the County. B. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not adversely affect the orderly development of property in the County Project Finding: Granting a land use permit to allow alcohol sales at the facility will only impact the manner in which the subject facility is operated. Alcohol sales will only be available in the clubhouse area of the subject property, and only to the residents and their guests. The granting of this land use permit does not allow alcohol sales on any other parcel within the County, and does not impact the manner in which any other existing alcohol sales activities in the County is administered. Based on the above, there is no evidence in the record indicating that the allowance of alcohol sales at the site will adversely affect the orderly development of property at the site. Page 16 of 18 C. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not adversely affect the preservation of property values and the protection of the tax base within the County Project Finding: The alcohol sales element of the CCRC facility will be secondary in nature and is not necessary for the daily operation of the facility. All alcohol sales will be administered in-doors and will be undetectable from outside both the apartment-style building and facility as a whole. Additionally, access to the clubhouse will be limited to residents of the facility and their guests, and not available to the general public at any time. Because the sale of alcohol makes up such a small portion of the services provided at the site and will be undetectable from outside the facility, there is little to no potential for the sale of alcohol to adversely affect the preservation of property values and the protection of the tax base within the County. D. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not adversely affect the policy and goals as set by the General Plan. Project Finding: By granting this land use permit, the County will allow the sale of alcohol within the clubhouse as an ancillary activity of the CCRC facility. The subject property will be located within a P-1 zoning district and CC General Plan Land Use designation, which are both project-oriented and relatively flexible with respect to the uses that are allowed on properties within their boundaries. The primary activities taking place at the facility will be associated with providing regular assistance and medical care for seniors, which are consistent with applicable policies and goals of the General Plan as discussed in the EIR. Alcohol sales will be a minor element of the use that will be subject to compliance with regulations of both Contra Costa County and the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The combination of being only a minor element of the overall land use, being available only to residents of the facility and their guests, and applicability of State and County regulations will ensure that any alcohol sales activities taking place at the facility will not adversely affect the policy and goals as set by the General plan. E. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not create a nuisance and/or enforcement problem within the neighborhood or community Project Finding: Alcohol sales will only be permitted to take place in the clubhouse area of the apartment-style building and will be essentially undetectable from adjacent properties. Alcohol will only be available for consumption onsite in the clubhouse area, and only to residents of the facility and their guests. Furthermore, residency within the facility is limited to seniors, and thus it can be reasonable assumed that the potential for nuisance issues related to alcohol consumption are further reduced when compared to that of an establishment that allows the sale of alcohol to patrons of all ages. Page 17 of 18 F. Required Finding: The proposed project shall not encourage marginal development Project Finding: Allowing alcohol sales at the facility will provide an added amenity and source of recreation for residents of the facility and their guests. The sale of alcohol at the facility will not be available to the general public, and thus there is a very limited population that will be served. The allowance of alcohol sales for onsite consumption in itself will not create a significant increase in employment, development, or business opportunities within the County beyond that which is being created by the CCRC facility as a whole. G. Required Finding: That special conditions or unique characteristics of the subject property and its location or surroundings are established Project Finding: Although the project site is predominantly surrounded by residential properties, the alcohol sales will take place in the clubhouse area of the facility and will be inaccessible and undetectable to the general public. Additionally, the facility operator will be subject to permitting requirements and restrictions administered by the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. This added level of state licensing and guidelines will ensure that alcohol sales taking place at the site are administered in a manner that is compatible with and that does not adversely impact the general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. X. Alcoholic Beverage Sales Commercial Activity Findings A. Required Finding: A finding of "public convenience and necessity" (Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4(b)(2)), if the activity will be located in an area that has been determined by the state of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to have an undue concentration of licenses as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4(a). On September 1, 2022, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control determined that the activity would be located in an area with an undue concentration of licenses. Therefore, a finding of public convenience and necessity is required for this project. Project Finding: There are various restaurants and other eating establishments in the vicinity of the project site where residents of the facility could potentially enjoy an alcoholic beverage with a meal or simply as part of a social outing. However, the residents of the CCRC will be seniors aged 60 and up, some of whom will likely have mobility and/or transportation limitations that make it more difficult to visit establishments outside the facility that also have permitted alcohol sales. By allowing alcohol sales within the facility, residents have easy access to this amenity in close proximity to where they live. Additionally, the service will be provided by employees of the facility who have a better understanding of the unique demands and needs of this unique population. Page 18 of 18 B. Required Finding: The alcohol beverage sales commercial activity will not aggravate existing problems in the neighborhood created by the sale of alcohol such as loitering, public drunkenness, alcoholic beverage sales to minors, noise, and littering. Project Finding: The subject property is located within a predominantly residential community in unincorporated Walnut Creek, which significantly limits the potential for existing nuisance issues related to existing alcohol sales. Alcoholic beverages are available at The Greenery Restaurant and Sports bar, which is located approximately 0.3 miles south of the project site at the Diablo Hills Golf Course. However, the Greenery’s location within an existing residential neighborhood and the fact that it is secondary in nature to the golf course land use, greatly reduces the potential for nuisance issues typically associated with establishments where the primary service is the sale of alcohol. Alcoholic beverages sold at the CCRC facility will only be available to facility residents and their guests, which greatly reduces the potential for sales to minors. Additionally, alcohol sales will only be available in the clubhouse area of the facility, which is not accessible to the general public. This location within a gated facility reduces the potential for loitering, public drunkenness, littering, and noise impacts to surrounding properties. Lastly, all alcohol sales at the facility will be subject to permitting by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, which has long-established guidelines designed to reduce the potential for the nuisance concerns that are the subject of this discussion. XI. Tree Permit Findings A. Reasonable development of the property would require removal and/or work within the dripline of code-protected trees, and this development could not be reasonably accommodated on another area of the lot. B. Where the arborist or forester report has been required, the Deputy Director for the Community Development Division is satisfied that the issuance of a permit will not negatively affect the sustainability of the resource. Attachment C Project Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 32    CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILES #CDGP20-00001, #CDRZ20-03255, #CDMS20-00007, #CDDP20-03018, #CDLP20-02038 (SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY) Administrative 1. These conditions of approval pertain to the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community project (“Project”), as approved under County Files #CDGP20-00001, #CDRZ20- 03255, #CDMS20-00007, #CDDP20-03018, and #CDLP20-02038. 2. Tentative Map approval is granted to reconfigure the two parcels that comprise the project site from approximately 13 and 17 acres in area, to 25 and 5 acres in area with refined legal descriptions. No approval for the subdivision of either parcel is granted as part of this permit. 3. Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval is granted to allow the construction of a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) consisting of the following primary components: a. 354 independent living units and amenities for residents not needing daily assistance; b. a health care center for 100 residents and non-residents requiring daily assistance or medical attention; c. a maintenance building; d. associated drainage, access, and utility improvements; e. amenities including a swimming pool, tennis courts, gym, auditorium, restaurants, bar, theatre, library, and clubhouse; and  f. approximately 225,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 150,000 cubic yards of fill grading activities resulting in a net export of 75,000 cubic yards of soil from the site. 4. Land Use Permit approval is granted to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages for onsite consumption within the proposed clubhouse.  5. Tree Permit approval is granted to allow the removal of up to 353 trees. 6. The issuance of a Business License is granted. Prior to commencing operation of the continuing care retirement community (CCRC), the applicant shall obtain a Business License from the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. The applicant shall obtain a Property Use Verification from the CDD prior to obtaining a business license. Consistency 7. Approval of the Tentative Map, Preliminary and Final Development Plan, Land Use Permit, and Tree Permit are contingent upon the Board of Supervisors also approving the General Plan Amendment (#CDGP20-00001) and Rezoning (#CDRZ20-03255) elements of the Project. Page 2 of 32    8. The Tentative Map, Preliminary and Final Development Plan, Land Use Permit, and Tree Permit approvals mentioned above are based on and as generally shown on the following documents: a. Application received by the CDD on August 3, 2020; b. Tentative Parcel Map and civil plans of BkF Engineers received by the CDD on December 22, 2020; c. Landscape plans of Gates and Associates received by the CDD on October 8, 2020; d. Architectural plans of KTGY received by the CDD on October 8, 2020; and e. Modified Villa Configuration Plan and Seven Hills School Boundary Section Drawings of Gates and Associates received by the CDD on November 17, 2022.   f. Exhibit of Offer of Land Dedication received by the CDD on November 22, 2022  Approval Duration 9. The Tentative Map approval is granted for a period of three years, which may be extended upon proper request for extension, and review and approval of the CDD. Indemnity 10. The Applicant shall enter into an Indemnification Agreement with the County, and the Applicant shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the County), and hold harmless the County, its boards, commissions, officers, employees, and agents (collectively “County Parties”) from any and all claims costs, losses, actions, fees, liabilities, expenses, and damages (collectively, “Liabilities”) arising from or related to the Project, the Applicant’s applications for a land use entitlement, the County’s discretionary approvals for the Project, the County’s actions pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and planning and zoning laws, or the construction and operation of the Project, regardless of when those Liabilities accrue. The scope of indemnity provided by the Applicant is more specifically described in the Indemnification Agreement. Fees 11. This Project is subject to initial application deposits of $5,200 for the General Plan Amendment, $7,000 for the Rezoning, $5,000 for the Tentative Map Review, $500 for the Development Plan, and $5,500 for the Land Use Permit, which were paid with the application submittals, plus time and materials costs if the application review expenses exceed 100% of the initial deposit. Any additional costs due under applicable County laws and regulations must be paid prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, issuance of a building permit, within 60 days of the permit’s effective date, or prior to use of the permit, whichever occurs first. The fees include costs through permit issuance and final file preparation. Pursuant to Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Resolution Number 2013-340, where a fee payment is over 60 days past due from the date of approval, the application shall be charged interest at a rate of ten percent (10%). The Applicant may obtain current costs by contacting the Project planner. Page 3 of 32    If the Applicant owes any additional costs, a bill will be sent to the Applicant shortly after permit issuance. 12. No later than five days after project approval, the applicant shall pay the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) CEQA filing fee of $3,539.25 and a County Clerk processing fee of $50. A Notice of Determination, which commences the running of a 30-day statute of limitations for CEQA purposes, cannot be filed absent payment of these fees. 13. In the event that the County elects to use a third-party consultant to assist in the monitoring of environmental mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and other requirements of these conditions, then the Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all actual fees associated with the consultant’s contract. Compliance Report 14. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building or grading permit, or commencement of construction-related activities, whichever occurs first, the Applicant shall submit an application for Condition of Approval compliance verification to confirm compliance with conditions relevant to that event. The initial deposit for a project of this size is $10,000, which is subject to staff time and materials costs. Should staff costs exceed the deposit, additional payment will be required in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Applicant shall submit a report in compliance with the conditions of approval set forth herein for review and approval of the CDD. The report shall list each condition followed by a description of what has been provided as evidence of compliance with that condition. The CDD may reject the report if it is not reasonably comprehensive with respect to the applicable requirements for the requested approval, and the Applicant shall re-submit this compliance verification with changes made in response to comments received by the CDD. Cardroom 15. No license or permit for establishment of a cardroom, as defined in Section 52-3.103 of the County Ordinance, [or any other related games or activities] is granted under this permit. Prior to CDD stamp approval of plans for issuance of a building permit to construct the apartment style building, the applicant shall submit a revised floor plan that redesignates the use of the “card room” currently shown on the first-floor plan. Special Events 16. No portion of the facility shall be leased, rented, or otherwise offered to the general public for the hosting of special events. State Permits/Licenses Page 4 of 32    17. Prior to entering into continuing care contracts with potential residents, the facility operator is responsible for obtaining a Permit to Accept Deposits/Certificate of Authority from the California Department of Social Services (CDSS). 18. Prior to final inspection for occupancy of the apartment-style building, single-story buildings, or health center, the facility operator shall provide the CDD with a copy of a state- issued Residential Care Facility for the Elderly License. Alcohol Sales 19. This approval is for the sale of alcohol for on-site consumption within the clubhouse only. 20. Prior to final building inspection of the building in which alcohol sales will be administered, the applicant shall provide evidence to the CDD that a license has been obtained or is under review by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the alcohol sales approved under this permit. All required permits from the California ABC shall remain current and in good standing for the life of the approved alcohol sales use. 21. Within thirty days from the commencement of alcohol sales, the applicant shall provide evidence to the CDD that the facility has been registered with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. Trees 22. Prior to any tree removal, the applicant shall obtain the necessary grading permits for all proposed site preparation and roadway or structural improvements. 23. Removal of trees that have been rated by the consulting arborist as being in “Fair” or “Good” condition and that are not located within areas identified for permanent improvements (i.e., buildings, roadways, drainage facilities) or grading activities, shall be prohibited. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of a building or grading permit or any ground disturbance at the site, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall provide the CDD with the following information and documents:  An updated tree removal plan (Sheets C2.1 and C2.2) that removes the existing site contours, and that includes grading limits and the building envelope for all proposed permanent improvements;  A tree removal inventory including the identification number (as provided in the consulting arborist’s report) of all trees proposed for removal at the site, the condition of each tree, and the reason for the proposed tree removal (e.g., within building or grading envelope, poor condition, dead) Page 5 of 32    24. Required restitution for Approved Tree Removal – The following measures shall be implemented to provide restitution for the protected trees that have been approved for removal. a. Tree Restitution Planting/Irrigation Plan: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the Applicant shall submit a tree planting and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed arborist or landscape architect for the review and approval of the CDD. The plan shall identify protected trees that are to be removed or preserved, and shall provide for the planting of trees equal in number to the quantity proposed for removal in compliance with Condition of Approval #23 immediately above. The quantity of oak trees to be replanted under the plan shall equal or exceed the quantity proposed for removal. All restitution plantings shall be a minimum 15 gallons in size. The plan shall comply with the Water Efficient Landscapes Ordinance (County Code Chapter 82-26) and verification of such shall accompany the plan. The plan shall be accompanied by an estimate, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, arborist, or landscape contractor, of the materials and labor costs to complete the improvements (accounting for purchase and installation of trees and any necessary irrigation). b. Required Security to Assure the Completion of Plan Improvements: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the Applicant shall submit a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit or other financial instrument) that is acceptable to the CDD. The security shall include the amount of the approved cost estimate for replacement and planting, plus a 20% inflation surcharge. c. Initial Fee Deposit for Processing of a Security: The County Ordinance Code requires that the Applicant pay fees for all time and materials costs of staff for processing a landscape improvement security. At the time of submittal of the security, the Applicant shall pay a deposit of $200. d. Timing of Planting Plan Implementation: Prior to final inspection of the 354th independent living unit or CDD stamp approval of plans for the issuance of building permits to allow vertical construction of the Health Center, whichever occurs first, the consulting arborist shall verify that all replacement trees and related irrigation proposed within the boundaries of the proposed 25-acre parcel for the independent living units, have been installed. Replacement tree and related irrigation proposed within the boundaries of the 5-acre health center parcel shall be installed prior to final inspection of the health center building. e. Duration of Security: Prior to final inspection of the health center building, the consulting arborist shall verify that all required replacement trees have been properly planted, and when verified, notify the CDD in writing. The security shall be retained by the County for a minimum on 12 months, and up to 24 months, beyond the date of receipt of the written verification of installation. A prerequisite of releasing the bond between 12 and 24 months shall be to have the Applicant arrange for the consulting arborist to inspect all required replacement trees and to prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event the Page 6 of 32    CDD determines that the required replacement trees have been damaged or have died, then the CDD may require that all or part of the security be used to provide for replacement of the dead or damaged tree(s). f. Integration with Final Landscape Plan: The tree restitution planting and irrigation plans described in Subsection(a) above may be incorporated as part of the “Final Landscape Plan” required below. However, the integrated plan shall identify each designated replacement tree required to replace removed trees, and that are intended to satisfy this condition. The estimate required pursuant to Subsection-(a) above shall only cover materials and labor associated with the implementation of the required tree restitution, and not the full Final Landscape Plan. 25. Prior to grading, trenching, filling, or any other ground disturbing activity within the dripline of any tree identified for preservation, the applicant shall provide an arborist report detailing measures to be implemented during construction activities to ensure the continued vitality of the tree. 26. Prior to the start of any clearing, stockpiling, trenching, grading compaction, paving, or change in ground elevation, the applicant shall install fencing at the dripline or other area as determined by an arborist, of all trees adjacent to or in the area to be altered. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the fences shall be inspected, and the location thereof approved by the consulting arborist or appropriate County staff. 27. No grading, compaction, stockpiling, trenching, paving, or change in ground elevation shall be permitted within the dripline of a tree to be preserved unless indicated on plans approved by the County and addressed in any required report prepared by an arborist. If grading or construction is approved within the dripline, an arborist may be required to be present during grading operations. The arborist shall have the authority to require protective measures to protect the roots. Upon completion of grading and construction, the consulting arborist shall prepare a report outlining further methods required for tree protection if any are required. All arborist expense shall be borne by the developer and applicant. 28. No parking or storing of vehicles, equipment, machinery, construction materials, or construction trailers, and no dumping of oils or chemicals shall be permitted within the dripline of any tree to be preserved. Final Landscape Plan 29. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map or CDD stamp approval of plans for issuance of a building or grading permit, whichever occurs first, a final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the CDD for review and approval. The plan shall be designed in general accord with the preliminary landscape plans of Gates and Associates received by the CDD on October 8, 2020. The Final Landscape Plan shall be compliant with the County’s Water Efficient Landscapes Ordinance (Chapter 82-26). Page 7 of 32    30. Prior to any tree removal, stamp-approval of plans for the issuance of a grading permit, or any ground disturbance activity that may impact existing trees, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall provide evidence to the County that any necessary permits have been obtained from the City of Walnut Creek for tree removal or trimming proposed within the city limits. 31. Where feasible, all construction contractors shall limit impacts to the roots of off-site trees that may encroach upon the subject property and construction areas. Signage 32. The Applicant shall submit a detailed sign program for review and approval of the CDD. The sign program may be submitted and approved in parts. A preliminary sign program including provisions for monument signs and signs related to the independent living units shall be submitted and approved by the CDD prior to stamp-approval of plans for issuance of building permits for the first building containing independent living units. A Final Sign program with provisions addressing signs for the health center shall be submitted and approved prior to CDD stamp approval of plans for issuance of building permits for health center improvements. The Final sign program shall be consistent with the County’s Sign Ordinance (Chapter 88-6). Transportation and Parking Demand Management (TDM) 33. The applicant shall implement a project-specific Final Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program with the goal of encouraging residents of the development to use alternate modes of transportation. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of building or grading permits, the applicant shall submit a conceptual TDM Program for review and approval of the CDD. The TDM Program shall comply with the standards of the County TDM Ordinance and shall identify single-occupancy automobile trip reduction strategies as well as mechanisms for funding and overseeing the delivery of trip reduction programs and strategies. Trip reductions strategies may include, but not be limited to, the following:  a. Pedestrian and bicycle improvements, onsite or offsite, to connect to existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities, nearby transit stops, services, schools, shops, etc., in accordance with County policies and plans;  b. Provision of or enhancements to transit amenities near the project site  c. Information to be distributed regarding:  i. transit, carpool, vanpool, rideshare, TNC (e.g. Uber, Lyft), “Guaranteed Ride Home,” and micromobility (e.g. bikeshare, scooter share) services,  Page 8 of 32    ii. pedestrian and bicycle connections to off-site destinations (e.g. transit stops/stations, commercial areas, schools, and community amenities (e.g. parks, community center), and  iii. incentives, promotions, and events that support single-automobile trip reduction.  d. On-site amenities that reduce demand for external automobile trips (e.g. bicycle parking, showers/locker rooms, fitness center, childcare services).  e. Compliance with a future County VMT/TDM ordinance.  f. Participation in a future County VMT fee program.  34. As part of the applicant’s TDM program submittal, the applicant shall provide a plan detailing the location of at least 90 long-term bicycle parking spaces. Financial Assistance Program for Independent Living Units 35. The applicant has agreed to establish and implement a financial assistance program (the “Program”) for the independent living units proposed as part of the Project. The Program will include the following components: A. The facility operator will establish an annuity for the purpose of providing ongoing subsidies to lower-income households that would not otherwise have the financial means to live in the facility. The facility operator will fund the annuity by depositing, concurrently with issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project’s first independent living unit, $2,000,000 into a separate account established solely for this purpose. The facility operator will provide monthly fee subsidies to Program participants utilizing funds from the annuity. Prior to occupancy of any independent living units, the County and the applicant or facility operator will establish specific administrative guidelines covering the use and investment of the annuity which shall serve to implement the following Program objectives: 1. The facility operator will use commercial best efforts to market independent living units and the Program to lower-income households and provide monthly fee subsidies to Program participants, with a target occupancy rate of 10% of the Project’s independent living units. 2. The Program shall be designed to be available and utilized for a period of 20 years from the first deposit into the annuity account. 3. The annuity shall retain any accrued interest. The applicant or facility operator will use best business practices in investment of the annuity funds. Page 9 of 32    B. The facility operator will operate the Program to comply with the following standards: 1. Residents participating in the Program shall reside in independent living apartments dispersed throughout the facility and have access to all on-site amenities that are available to residents not participating in the Program. 2. The construction quality and exterior design of the independent living units occupied by Program participants must be comparable to those of similar units occupied by residents not participating in the Program. C. Annually, the facility operator will provide the County a report detailing the use and accounting of the annuity, the number of Program participants that the facility operator has admitted under the Program during the previous calendar year, the annual incomes of the participant households, and the annual incomes of other households that may be qualified as Moderate-, Lower- or Very Low-Income Households. In the event the facility operator fails to meet the targets set forth in Section A, the facility operator will provide the County a written plan for meeting those targets in the future. D. The facility operator will be solely responsible for marketing the Program to qualified households. When feasible, the facility operator will grant priority preference to Program applicants as follows: 1. Households qualified as Very Low-Income Households, as defined in Government Code section 50105. 2. Households qualified as Lower-Income Households, as defined in Government Code section 50079.5. 3. Households then currently residing in Contra Costa County. 4. Households no longer residing in Contra Costa County, but that did reside in Contra Costa County within six months of their application submittal or did reside in Contra Costa County continuously for at least ten years immediately prior to no longer residing in the county. 5. Households with a principal care giver, or with a child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner, then currently residing in Contra Costa County. 6. Households with a principal care giver, or with a child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner, then currently working in Contra Costa County. 7. All other households. E. The County and facility operator may jointly elect to extend or increase the annuity to make additional independent living units available for application of this Page 10 of 32    Program and/or to increase the subsidy provided to target-income households that occupy independent living units within the Project. F. If the facility operator fails to meet the target occupancy rate of 10% of the Project’s independent living units for five consecutive years and fails to expend $500,000 from the annuity for monthly fee subsidies during the same period, the facility operator shall pay to the County an amount equal to the then-remaining balance of the annuity. Community Benefits Agreement 36. The applicant has agreed to enter into a Community Benefits Agreement with the County to make an annual community benefits contribution to the County to benefit the local community, including areas within the unincorporated Contra Costa County and the City of Walnut Creek near the Project. The agreement will detail the timing and amount of the agreed-upon community benefit payments. Prior to filing the Parcel Map for the project, the applicant shall provide the CDD with an executed copy of the Community Benefits Agreement between the applicant and County. Conversion to For Sale or For Rent Units 37. Any future conversion of any approved independent living units to for-sale units or rental units shall require a modification to the approved Final Development Plan, subject to review and approval by the County. Any future proposal to convert any approved independent living units shall be evaluated for compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations, including all applicable County zoning requirements. Climate Action Plan Consistency 38. Prior to CDD stamp-approval of plans for issuance of building permits for any independent living unit building or the health center, the applicant shall provide evidence (construction plan details/notes) that the proposed building meets or exceeds minimum applicable standards listed in Table-E.1 (Standards for CAP Consistency – New Development) of the County Climate Action Plan’s Appendix-E, as follows: a. All appliances and insulation installed by the project sponsor shall be rated high efficiency. b. All buildings shall meet standards to be solar ready as defined by the California Building Code. Aesthetics Page 11 of 32    39. A lighting plan for any proposed exterior lighting shall be submitted to the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division for review and approval and include the following (MM AES-4.1): a. Exterior lighting must be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of way to prevent glare or excessive light spillover. Lighting bulbs must be limited to low intensity lights, including lighting for identification purposes. b. No free-standing light poles (except those used within building interior courtyards and for internal roadway lighting) will be allowed within the project site. Landscaping lights must be limited to ground-level for walking/safety purposes. c. If any lighting is proposed for the construction staging area, lighting must also be directed downward and away from adjacent properties. Lighting intensity may not be greater than what is reasonably required to safely illuminate the staging area. Building and Retaining Wall Color and Materials Palette 40. The exterior of all proposed buildings and retaining walls shall be composed of materials that naturally are or that have otherwise been finished in earth tones, similar to those shown on the approved architectural plans. Prior to CDD stamp approval of plans for issuance of a building permit for construction of the health center, buildings to house independent living units, or any retaining walls, the applicant shall submit a color palette and materials sample for review and approval of the CDD. Air Quality 41. Enhanced BAAQMD Best Management Practices: The project shall implement the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD’s) recommended best management practices (BMPs) and additional measures to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. These measures shall include the following (MM AIR-1.1): a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered three times a day and at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12 percent. Moisture content shall be verified by lab samples or moisture probe. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using a wet power vacuum street sweeper at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping shall be prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. Page 12 of 32    e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to two minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. Use interior coatings with no more than 88 grams per liter volatile organic compounds (VOC) (i.e., ROG) and exterior coatings with no more than 132 grams per liter VOC (i.e., ROG) to reduce daily emissions by at least 12 percent. Coating must also meet or exceed BAAQMD requirements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coatings). Alternatively, the project could submit a plan to demonstrate that overall VOC content of architectural coatings would be at least 12 percent below BAAQMD requirements. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. i. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site boundaries. j. Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity. k. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast-germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established. l. The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time. m. Avoid tracking of visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if necessary: (1) Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from public paved roads shall be treated with a 6- to 12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel, and (2) washing truck tires and construction equipment prior to leaving the site. n. Sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent. Recycled Water for Construction and Dust Control 42. If available within a reasonable distance from the project site, recycled water shall be used for construction and dust control activities. Page 13 of 32    43. Selection of Construction Equipment: Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits, the project applicant shall retain a qualified consultant to develop a plan demonstrating that the off-road equipment used onsite to construct the project would achieve a fleet-wide average 72 percent reduction in diesel particulate matter (DPM) exhaust emissions or greater and a fleet-wide average 16 percent reduction in NOX or greater. This is the minimum reduction required to reduce the project impacts (i.e., NOX emissions and cancer risk) to a less than significant level. The feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following (MM AIR-1.2): a. All diesel-powered off-road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 4 interim engines. Where Tier 4 equipment is not available, exceptions could be made for equipment that includes California Air Resources Board (CARB)- certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters or equivalent. Equipment that is electrically powered or uses non-diesel fuels would also meet this requirement. Biological Resources 44. Pre-Construction Bat Surveys: A pre-activity survey for roosting bats shall be conducted at the two valley oaks (Quercus lobata) that support suitable roost habitat near the northeastern and southeastern corners of the project site within 30 days prior to the onset of ground-disturbing activities. A qualified biologist will conduct a survey to look for evidence of bat use within suitable habitat. If evidence of use is observed, or if high- quality roost sites (e.g., a tree with a large cavity) are present in areas where evidence of bat use might not be detectable, an evening visual survey combined with a nighttime acoustic survey shall be conducted to determine if roosting bats are present and to identify the specific location of such bats. If no roosting bats are located, project work can continue as Planned. If a maternity roost is detected, a disturbance-free buffer zone (determined by a qualified biologist) shall be implemented during the maternity roost season (March 15–August 31). No project-related activities shall take place within the buffer during the maternity season. If an active non-breeding bat roost is located, project work shall be redesigned to avoid removal or disturbance of the occupied tree. No buffer from the roost shall be necessary during the nonmaternity season (September 1–March 14). If the roost tree itself must be removed, bats shall be passively excluded from roost habitat with one-way devices, or trees will be removed using a two-step tree removal process. The two-step process shall be initiated if exclusion with one-way devices is not feasible due to height of the roost. For the two-step process, trees shall be removed over a two-day period. On day 1, all non- suitable limbs shall be removed, and on day 2, the remainder of the tree shall be removed. Removing trees in this way creates disturbance that encourages bats to vacate the tree before the potential habitat is removed. Either method shall be monitored by a qualified Page 14 of 32    biologist with knowledge of bat ecology and experience with bat exclusion methods. (MM BIO-1.1) 45. Pre-construction surveys for western burrowing owl shall be conducted in accordance with the March 7, 2012, CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If preconstruction surveys find active nests avoidance and minimization guidelines (such as site surveillance, buffers, translocation, artificial burrows, or habitat replacement) must be developed prior to the start of construction in accordance with the March 7, 2012, CDFW memo, and through consultation with CDFW. (MM BIO-1.2) 46. Avoidance and Nesting Inhibition: To the extent feasible, construction activities (or at least the commencement of such activities) shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season. If construction activities are scheduled to take place outside the nesting season, all impacts on nesting birds protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code shall be avoided. The nesting season for most birds in Contra Costa County extends from February 1 through August 31. If construction activities will not be initiated until after the start of the nesting season, all potential nesting substrates (e.g., bushes, trees, grasses, and other vegetation) that are scheduled to be removed by the project shall be removed prior to the start of the nesting season (e.g., prior to February 1). This will preclude the initiation of nests in this vegetation, and prevent the potential delay of the project due to the presence of active nests in these substrates. (MM BIO-1.3) 47. Pre-Construction Bird Surveys: If not possible to schedule construction activities between September 1 and January 31, pre-construction nesting bird surveys shall be completed by a qualified biologist no more than seven days before construction begins. During this survey, the biologist or ornithologist shall inspect all trees and other possible nesting habitats in and within 250 feet of the project boundary. If an active nest is found in an area that would be disturbed by construction, the biologist shall designate an adequate buffer zone (typically 300 feet for raptors and 100 feet for other species) to be established around the nest, in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The buffer would ensure that nests shall not be disturbed until the young have fledged (left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts. The applicant shall submit a report indicating the results of the survey and any designated buffer zones to the satisfaction of the Department of Conservation and Development, prior to the removal of trees and issuance of a grading permit or demolition permit. (MM BIO-1.4) 48. Avoidance and Minimization: Prior to the start of construction the property owner or project sponsor shall clearly delineate riparian habitat to be avoided with fencing around Page 15 of 32    the dripline of the riparian canopy. Further indirect impacts to riparian habitat shall be avoided by implementing the following measures during construction (MM BIO-2.1): a. Existing native vegetation shall be retained by removing only as much vegetation as necessary to accommodate the new road. Any vegetation removed shall be replaced per MM BIO-2.2 below. b. Temporary disturbance or removal of riparian vegetation shall not exceed the minimum necessary to complete the work. Any vegetation removed shall be replaced per MM BIO-2.2 below. c. Exposed soil shall be controlled by stabilizing slopes (e.g., with erosion control blankets) and protecting channels (e.g., using silt fences or straw wattles). d. Site ingress/egress locations shall be stabilized (e.g., with erosion control blankets). 49. Compensatory Mitigation for Permanent Loss of Riparian Habitat: For areas that are not able to be avoided, the property owner or project sponsor shall restore or enhance an equivalent area at a 2:1 (mitigation:impact) ratio, on an acreage basis (or as otherwise directed by a regulatory agency with regulatory authority over impacts to riparian habitat on the site). Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a Riparian and Aquatic Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Riparian and Aquatic HMMP) for aquatic and riparian habitat creation as a means of compensatory mitigation. The Riparian and Aquatic HMMP shall be prepared by a qualified restoration ecologist and shall provide, at a minimum, the following items: a. Habitat impacts summary and proposed habitat mitigation actions. b. Goals of the restoration to achieve no net loss. c. The location of the mitigation sites and existing site conditions. d. Mitigation design including:  Proposed site construction schedule.  Description of existing and proposed soils, hydrology, geomorphology and geotechnical stability.  Site preparation and grading plan.  Invasive species eradication plan.  Soil amendments and other site preparation.  Planting plan (plant procurement/propagation/installation).  Maintenance plan. e. Monitoring measures, and performance and success criteria. At a minimum, success criteria shall include at least 70 percent cover by native, woody riparian vegetation by year five. f. Monitoring methods, duration, and schedule. g. Contingency measures and remedial actions. h. Reporting measures. The mitigation shall be deemed complete and the applicant released from further responsibilities when the final success criteria have been met, or when the mitigation is Page 16 of 32    deemed complete as determined by applicable regulatory/resource agencies. (MM BIO 2.2) 50. Construction Best Management Practices: The central drainage and associated seasonal wetlands that are to be avoided by the project design will be protected from construction activities through implementation of best management practices (BMPs) such as installing silt fencing between jurisdictional waters and project related activities, locating staging and laydown areas away from potentially jurisdictional features, and isolating construction work areas from any identified jurisdictional features. In addition, site stormwater treatment features must be designed consistent with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit as described above, and shall be placed in locations to treat runoff from the developed portion of the site before entering avoided wetlands. To the extent feasible, existing site drainage patterns in the vicinity of avoided wetlands shall be preserved to prevent indirect alterations to surface hydrology that may contribute to supporting the wetlands. (MM BIO-3.1) 51. Compensatory Mitigation for Permanent Loss of Wetlands: To compensate for the perennial drainage and seasonal wetlands that will be permanently impacted by extension of Kinross Drive to the project site, the project proponent shall implement one of the following, in agreement with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) as per permit requirements. (MM BIO- 3.2) a. Acquisition of equivalent wetlands and waters at a nearby site at a ratio of 2:1, on an acreage basis; b. Purchase of mitigation credits at a mitigation bank; c. Enhancement of seasonal wetlands and the perennial drainage to be preserved in the central portion of the site, as well as creation of seasonal wetland habitat in the bioretention facilities proposed on site, at a ratio of 2:1, on an acreage basis; d. An alternative to be agreed upon with the USACE and RWQCB. 52. To avoid encroachment within identified wetlands areas, the rip-rap aprons proposed under the clear-span bridge shall be relocated either outside the areas designated as jurisdictional by the Army Corps of Engineers, or further east to the general location of the culverted crossing that will be removed. 53. Construction Worker Training: Worker Awareness Training for cultural resources shall be provided to members of the construction excavation and grading team. Training shall consist of the preparation of an alert sheet that would provide guidance and procedures in the event of an unexpected discovery of cultural materials with photographs of typical artifact that shall be exposed coupled with a briefing of the construction crew. (MM CUL- 2.2) Page 17 of 32    54. Undiscovered Archaeological Resources: If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guideline Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity (“midden”), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction related earth-moving activities, all ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and the County Department of Conservation and Development be notified. The project sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The County shall consult with the archaeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archaeological documentation. Any identified resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-J) form and filed with the NWIC. (MM CUL-2.2) 55. Report of Archaeological Resources: If archaeological resources are identified, a final report summarizing the discovery of cultural materials shall be submitted to the County Department of Conservation and Development prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. This report shall contain a description of the mitigation program that was implemented and its results, including a description of the monitoring and testing program, a list of the resources found and conclusion, and a description of the disposition/curation of the resources. (MM CUL-2.3) 56. Human Remains: If human remains are discovered during project construction, all ground- disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the County Department of Conservation and Development and the Contra Costa County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project sponsor shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. Contra Costa County shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project sponsor shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by Contra Costa County and as determined appropriate by the NAHC, before the resumption of ground- disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. (MM CUL-3.1) Geology and Soils Page 18 of 32    57. Design-level Geotechnical Compliance: The applicant shall prepare a site-specific, design- level geotechnical investigation for the project. The design-level geotechnical report shall include, but not be limited to, the following considerations: a. The 2019 CBC classification of the site as being located in Site Class B or C shall be determined. Building foundations, retaining walls, and structural framing requirements will be impacted by the Site Classification. b. The central portion of the site is underlain by artificial fill and colluvial soils that are more than 17 feet deep. The liquefaction potential of these underlying soils shall be evaluated. c. More detailed evaluation of the excavation characteristics of the sandstone and claystone bedrock underlying the site shall be performed. The excavation characteristics of the bedrock will impact cut grading and excavations for underground utilities and foundations. d. Final recommendations for grading shall be provided, including permanent and temporary slope inclinations, differential fill thickness for building pads, fill construction, and the extent of colluvial and artificial soil removal. e. The impacts from the on-site expansive soils on proposed structures, pavements, and flatwork shall be addressed. f. The design and construction of valley drains and subdrains in fill keyways and benches shall be addressed. g. Potential water seepage through rock fractures, daylighting from cut slopes and into utility trenches shall be assessed. h. Pseudostatic seismic loads will need to be incorporated into the design of retaining walls which will be more than six feet tall, as specified in the CBC. All recommendations by the engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer shall be incorporated into the final design. Recommendations that are applicable to foundation design, earthwork, and site preparation that were prepared prior to or during the project design phase, shall be incorporated in the project. All foundations and other project structures that require building permits must be compliant with the provisions of the California Building Code. Construction drawings for the project, including seismic design factors, shall be subject to technical review and approval by the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development prior to issuance of construction permits. (MM GEO- 1.1) 58. Paleontological Monitoring: Construction activities involving excavation or other soil disturbance within the project site shall be required to retain a qualified Paleontological Monitor as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) (2010) equipped with necessary tools and supplies to monitor all excavation, trenching, or other ground disturbance. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected. Prior to issuance of a grading Page 19 of 32    permit a copy of the executed contract or other evidence that paleontological monitoring services have been retained, shall be provided to the County for review. Prior to beginning construction activities, the Principal Paleontologist shall attend a preconstruction meeting to identify specific areas on the project site where paleontological monitoring will be required and shall provide training to construction personnel on how to identify potentially significant fossils. The Principal Paleontologist will periodically assess monitoring results and if no significant fossils have been exposed after fifty percent of excavation, the Principal Paleontologist may determine that monitoring is no longer necessary. (MM GEO-6.1) 59. Inadvertent Discovery of Fossils: If fossils are discovered during excavation, the Principal Paleontologist or his/her designated representative will make a preliminary taxonomic identification and determine if the find is significant. For significant/ potentially significant fossil finds, the Paleontologist shall provide a written recommendation to the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development if further action is required, and provide recommended measures for any further evaluation, fossil collection, or protection of the resource. Any subsequent paleontologic work shall be approved by the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development and completed as quickly as possible to avoid damage to the fossils and delays in construction schedules. At a minimum, for significant fossils, the paleontological staff will assign a unique field number to each specimen identified; photograph the specimen and its geographic and stratigraphic context along with a scale near the specimen and its field number clearly visible in close- ups; record the location using a global positioning system (GPS), record the field number and associated specimen data (identification by taxon and element, etc.) and corresponding geologic and geographic site data (location, elevation, etc.) in the field notes and in a daily monitoring report; stabilize and prepare all fossils for identification, and identify to lowest taxonomic level. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected shall be prepared to a point ready for curation. Preparation shall include the careful removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing and repairing specimens, as necessary. Following laboratory work, all fossil specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level, cataloged, analyzed, and delivered to an accredited museum repository for permanent curation and storage. The cost of curation is assessed by the repository and is the responsibility of the project proponent. A report to be submitted to the repository museum documenting the results of the paleontological mitigation monitoring efforts associated with the project shall be prepared by the Principal Paleontologist. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods, an overview of the project site geology and paleontology, a list of taxa recovered, an analysis of fossils recovered and their scientific significance, and recommendations. (MM GEO-6.2) Hazards and Hazardous Materials Page 20 of 32    60. Conduct Asbestos and Lead Surveys Prior to Demolition. Prior to the issuance of demolition permits for the two existing residences and associated structures, the applicant shall retain a licensed professional to conduct asbestos and lead paint surveys. These surveys shall be conducted prior to the disturbance or removal of any suspect asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint, and these materials shall be characterized for asbestos and lead by a reliable method. All activities involving asbestos- containing materials and lead-based paint shall be conducted in accordance with governmental regulations, and all removal shall be conducted by properly licensed abatement contractors. (MM HAZ-2.1) 61. PCB Screening Assessment. Prior to the issuance of demolition permits for the existing residences and associated structures, the applicant shall submit a PCB Screening Assessment Form with their permit application.55 If on-site buildings do contain PCBs that exceed threshold limits, the project applicant shall follow applicable federal and state laws, which may include reporting to such agencies as the EPA, RWQCB, and DTSC, who may require additional sampling and abatement of PCBs consistent with state and federal requirements. (MM HAZ-2.2) Hydrology and Water Quality 62. In accordance with Division 914 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the project applicant shall collect and convey all stormwater entering and/or originating on this property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system that conveys the stormwater to a natural watercourse. Any proposed diversions of the watershed shall be subject to review by the County Public Works Department, and possibly be subject to hearing body approval. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit improvement plans for proposed drainage improvements, and a drainage report with hydrology and hydraulic calculations to the Engineering Services Division of the Public Works Department and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for review and approval that demonstrates the adequacy of the on-site drainage system and the downstream drainage system. The applicant shall verify the adequacy at any downstream drainage facility accepting stormwater from this project prior to discharging runoff. If the downstream system(s) is not adequate to handle the Existing Plus Project condition for the required design storm, improvements shall be constructed to make the system adequate. The applicant shall obtain access rights to make any necessary improvements to off-site facilities. (MM HYD-3.1) Noise 63. A Construction Noise Management Plan shall be prepared by the construction contractor and implemented prior to the start of and throughout construction to reduce noise impacts on the nearby existing land uses. The plan shall establish the procedures the Page 21 of 32    contractor will take to reasonably minimize construction noise at the nearby existing land uses. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures to reduce construction noise levels as low as practical (MM NOI-1.1): a. Restrict noise-generating activities including construction traffic at the construction site or in areas adjacent to the construction site to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no construction allowed on federal and State weekends and holidays. b. Potential contractors shall be requested to submit information on their noise management procedures and demonstrate a successful track record of construction noise management on prior projects. c. The selected contractor will equip all internal combustion engine driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. d. The selected contractor will prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. e. The selected contractor will locate stationary noise generating equipment such as air compressors or portable power generators as far as practical from sensitive receptors. f. The selected contractor will utilize “quiet” air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. g. The selected contractor shall limit the allowable hours for the delivery of materials or equipment to the site and truck traffic coming to and from the site for any purpose to Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. h. The selected contractor will establish construction staging areas and material stockpiles at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction to a distance of at least 75 feet, as is feasible. i. The selected contractor will designate a project liaison that will be responsible for responding to noise complaints during the construction phase. The name and phone number of the liaison will be conspicuously posted at construction areas and on all advanced notifications. This person will take steps to resolve complaints, including periodic noise monitoring, if necessary. Results of noise monitoring will be presented at regular project meetings with the project contractor, and the liaison will coordinate with the contractor to modify any construction activities that generated excessive noise levels to the extent feasible. j. The selected contractor will hold a preconstruction meeting with the job inspectors and the general contractor/on-site project manager to confirm that noise mitigation and practices (including construction hours, construction schedule, and noise coordinator) are completed. k. Prior to the initiating of each phase of the project (e.g. grading, construction) neighboring property owners within 300 feet of construction activity shall be notified in writing of the construction schedule and at least 2 weeks prior to loud Page 22 of 32    noise-generating activities. Notification will include the nature and estimated duration of the activity. l. A qualified acoustical professional shall be retained to address noise concerns, and if needed, to determine if construction noise levels at adjacent property lines are consistent with the findings of the certified EIR. Corrective actions shall be taken to reduce construction noise if inconsistencies are identified. Temporary noise barriers shall be installed during construction phases involving earth moving equipment (e.g., grading operations) where they would be effective in reducing the construction noise impact, when directly adjoining sensitive receptors, such as at the Seven Hills School. An eight-foot plywood noise barrier could reduce noise levels by at least 5 dBA. 64. Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet 50 dBA Leq during daytime hours and 40 dBA Leq during nighttime hours. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained by the project applicant to review mechanical noise as the equipment systems are selected in order to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the noise limits at all adjacent noise sensitive land uses. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, locating equipment away from noise sensitive locations, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers such as enclosures and parapet walls to block the line of sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. If properly designed and controlled, the combined worst-case noise level due to the operation of on-site noise sources including the project parking lots, mechanical equipment, and maintenance building operations would not be substantially increased with the project and would remain below the 60 dBA Ldn noise and land use compatibility thresholds established for residential land uses by Contra Costa County and the City of Walnut Creek. (MM NOI-1.2) 65. The project shall implement the following measures to minimize vibration impacts from construction activities (MM NOI-2.1): a. Avoid the use of vibratory rollers and other heavy construction equipment within 20 feet of existing structures. b. Place operating equipment on the construction site as far as possible from vibration sensitive receptors. c. Use smaller equipment within 20 feet of the perimeter property lines adjoining off site structures to minimize vibration levels below the limits. d. Select demolition methods not involving impact tools within 100 feet of the perimeter property lines adjoining off-site structures. e. Avoid dropping heavy objects or materials near vibration sensitive locations. f. A list of all heavy construction equipment to be used for this project known to produce high vibration levels (tracked vehicles, vibratory compaction, jackhammers, hoe rams, etc.) shall be submitted to the County by the contractor. This list shall be used to identify equipment and activities that would potentially Page 23 of 32    generate substantial vibration and to define the level of effort required for continuous vibration monitoring. Child Care 66. In accordance with Chapter 82-22 (Child Care Facilities) of the County Ordinance Code the developer shall mitigate the need for four additional infant child care spaces created by the proposed development via one or a combination of the following methods:  a. The developer may contribute funds directly to family child care providers in the Walnut Creek area to encourage providers to care for infants. The submitted funds are intended for use in training or the purchase of infant equipment. The fund contribution amount shall be sufficient to train a sufficient number of additional staff or to purchase enough equipment to substantially meet the additional infant child care demand created by the proposed development. The fund amount shall be subject to review and approval of CoCoKids and the Community Development Division.  b. The developer may contract with the CoCoKids to recruit and train additional family child care providers, with a special focus on recruiting providers to provide infant care. The proposed contract shall be submitted for review and approval of the Community Development Division.  PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Applicant shall comply with the requirements of Title 8, Title 9, and Title 10 of the Ordinance Code. Any exceptions must be stipulated in these Conditions of Approval. Conditions of Approval are based on tentative map submitted to the Department of Conservation and Development on December 22, 2020. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.   67. The drainage, road, and utility improvements outlined below shall require the review and approval of the Public Works Department and are based on the vesting tentative map received by the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division, on December 22, 2020. 68. Improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be submitted, if necessary, to the City of Walnut Creek for any improvements constructed within the corporate limits of the City. City review includes review and inspection fees, and secu­rity for all improvements required by the Environmental Impact Report’s Mitigation Measures and the conditions of approval for this entitlement. Page 24 of 32    Public Streets (North San Carlos Drive/Seven Hills Ranch Road/Kinross Drive) 69. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Walnut Creek to determine what frontage or road improvements, roadway dedications, or right of way acquisitions, may be required by the City. Based on the project description and environmental review, these improvements are anticipated to include: a. Extend Kinross Drive to provide primary access to the project site. Kinross Drive is a two-lane collector street located within the Walnut Creek city limits. The extension of Kinross Drive would be constructed within a 50-foot right-of-way that was previously dedicated to the city. The proposed extension of Kinross Drive will transition as it approaches the project from two-lanes to three-lanes, two lanes for ingress. b. Kinross Drive improvements include constructing sidewalk on the northeast side and installing landscaping on the southwest side. 70. Vehicular entrance gates shall be located such that vehicles can queue without obstructing through traffic. Land Dedication for Potential Future Use by the County for Flood Control, Restoration and/or Trail Development 71. Prior to filing of the Parcel Map, the property owner shall convey to the County, by separate instrument, an irrevocable offer of dedication in fee for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, in the County’s sole discretion, of the approximately 2.4-acre area, depicted in the attached Exhibit A, along the western boundary of the project site. The form of the irrevocable offer of dedication shall be subject to review and approval by the CDD. The irrevocable offer of dedication shall be recorded concurrently with, or prior to, recordation of the parcel map.     Access to Adjoining Property Proof of Access 72. Applicant shall furnish proof to the County Public Works Department of the acquisition of all necessary rights of way, rights of entry, permits and/or easements for the construction of off-site, temporary, or permanent, public, and private road and drainage improvements. 73. Applicant shall furnish proof to the County Public Works Department that legal access to the property is available from Kinross Drive, North San Carlos Drive and Seven Hills Ranch Road. Easement Vacation Page 25 of 32    74. Applicant shall furnish proof to the County Public Works Department that all existing easements in conflict with proposed improvements are being relocated or have been abandoned, quitclaimed, vacated, or otherwise extinguished by the easement holder(s). Encroachment Permit 75. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Walnut Creek, if necessary, for construction of improvements within the right-of-way of Kinross Drive or other City rights of way. Private Roads 76. Applicant shall construct the on-site roadway system to current County private road standards with a minimum travel way width of 20 feet, or as otherwise required by the Fire Marshal. 77. Applicant shall ensure that emergency and refuse collection vehicles are able to maneuver through the proposed development and construct a paved turnaround at the end of all the proposed private roads. 78. Applicant shall furnish proof to the County Public Works Department that legal access to the property is available from Kinross Drive, North San Carlos Drive and Seven Hills Ranch Road. Emergency Vehicle Access 79. Emergency vehicle access (EVA) shall be provided via a gated, fire district compliant entrance extending from the health care center to North San Carlos Drive at the north end of the project site. 80. The project shall improve North San Carlos Drive from the proposed EVA gate to the Heather Farm Dog Park to meet fire district standards. These improvements fall under the purview of the City of Walnut Creek. 81. A supplemental gated EVA shall also be provided from the internal access road to the extension of Seven Hills Ranch Road at the southwest end of the site. Pedestrian Facilities 82. The proposed secondary emergency vehicle access points at North San Carlos Drive and Seven Hills Ranch Road should be designed to allow use by residents and employees of the facility accessing the site as pedestrians and bicyclists. Page 26 of 32    83. Applicant shall design all public and private pedestrian facilities in accordance with Title 24 (Handicap Access) and the Americans with Disabilities Act. This shall include all sidewalks, paths, driveway depressions, and curb ramps. 84. The EVA access points located on the north and south ends of the project site shall be equipped with gates allowing pedestrian and bicycle access. Residents and employees shall be provided with keycards allowing for access via these gates upon request. Parking 85. Parking shall be prohibited on one side of on-site roadways where the curb-to-curb width is less than 36 feet and on both sides of on-site roadways where the curb-to-curb width is less than 28 feet. “No Parking” signs shall be installed along these portions of the roads subject to the review and approval of the County Public Works Department. Utilities/Undergrounding 86. Applicant shall underground all new and existing utility distribution facilities. Applicant shall provide joint trench composite plans for the underground electrical, gas, telephone, cable television and communication conduits and cables including the size, location and details of all trenches, locations of building utility service stubs and meters and placements or arrangements of junction structures as a part of the Improvement Plan submittals for the project. The composite drawings and/or utility improvement plans shall be signed by a licensed civil engineer. Countywide Street Light Financing 87. Prior to filing the Parcel Map, the property owner(s) shall annex to the Community Facilities District (CFD) 2010-1 formed for Countywide Street Light Financing. Annexation into a street light service area does not include the transfer of ownership and maintenance of street lighting on private roads. Sub-regional Park Maintenance Financing 88. Prior to filing the Parcel Map, the property owner shall request and pay all associated costs relative to annexation to County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (Contra Costa Centre Area – Park Maintenance).  Drainage Improvements Collect and Convey Page 27 of 32    89. Applicant shall collect and convey all stormwater entering and/or originating on this property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the stormwater to an adequate natural watercourse, in accordance with Division 914 of the Ordinance Code. 90. Storm drain infrastructure that traverses or directly discharges to facilities within the City of Walnut Creek will be subject to compliance with the City of Walnut Creek’s Minimum Drainage Design Standards. Permits, plan review, and inspection shall be coordinated with the City. 91. Any revisions to the proposed drainage infrastructure shown on the tentative parcel map shall be subject to review and approval by the CDD and County Public Works Department prior to implementation.  Miscellaneous Drainage Requirements 92. The applicant shall submit hydrology and hydraulic calculations showing the adequacy of the onsite drainage system and the downstream drainage system. 93. Applicant shall prevent storm drainage from draining across the sidewalk(s) and driveway(s) in a concentrated manner. Wetlands Protection 94. The applicant shall relinquish "development rights" over that portion of the site that is within the area of the enhanced wetlands delineated on the site plan, or as otherwise required by State or Federal regulatory agencies. "Development Rights" shall be conveyed to the County by grant deed. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 95. The applicant shall be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and procedures of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal, construction and industrial activities as promulgated by the California State Water Resources Control Board, or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards San Francisco Bay - Region II. Compliance shall include developing long-term best management practices (BMPs) for the reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants. The project design shall incorporate wherever feasible, the following long-term BMPs in accordance with the Contra Costa Clean Water Program for the site's stormwater drainage:  Minimize the amount of directly connected impervious surface area. Page 28 of 32     Install approved full trash capture devices on all catch basins (excluding catch basins within bioretention area) as reviewed and approved by the County Public Works Department. Trash capture devices shall meet the requirements of the County’s NPDES permit.  Place advisory warnings on all catch basins and storm drains using current storm drain markers.  Shallow roadside and on-site swales.  Construct concrete driveway weakened plane joints at angles to assist in directing run-off to landscaped/pervious areas prior to entering the street curb and gutter.  Shared trash bins shall be sealed to prevent leakage OR shall be located within a covered enclosure.  Other alternatives comparable to the above as approved by the County Public Works Department. Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance 96. The applicant shall submit a final Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) and a Stormwater Control Operation and Maintenance Plan (O+M Plan) to the County Public Works Department, which shall be reviewed for compliance with the County’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and shall be deemed consistent with the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) prior to filing the Parcel Map. All time and materials costs for review and preparation of the SWCP and the O+M Plan shall be borne by the applicant. 97. Improvement plans shall be reviewed to verify consistency with the final SWCP and compliance with Provision C.3 of the County’s NPDES Permit and the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014). 98. Stormwater management facilities shall be subject to inspection by the County Public Works Department; all time and materials costs for inspection of stormwater management facilities shall be borne by the applicant. 99. Prior to filing the Parcel Map, the property owner(s) shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Operation and Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County, in which the property owner(s) shall accept responsibility for and related to the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities, and grant access to relevant public agencies for inspection of stormwater management facilities. 100. Prior to filing the Parcel Map, the property owner(s) shall annex the subject property into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2007-1 (Stormwater Management Facilities), which funds responsibilities of Contra Costa County under its NPDES Permit to oversee the ongoing operation and maintenance of stormwater facilities by property owners. Page 29 of 32    101. Any proposed water quality features that are designed to retain water for longer than 72 hours shall be subject to the review of the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District. Construction Activities 102. Prior to the start of construction-related activities, the applicant shall prepare a Traffic Control Plan (TCP), including a haul route, for the review and approval of the County CDD and, as applicable, the City of Walnut Creek. The TCP shall incorporate the following elements: a. All construction traffic shall utilize Kinross Drive, except that: (1) Seven Hills Ranch Road may be utilized initially to facilitate access for construction of a temporary connection to Kinross Drive; and (b) Seven Hills Ranch Road and North San Carlos Drive may be utilized, subject to required applicable County and/or City permits to complete those utility and access improvements as specifically required to serve the Project pursuant to the Final Development Plan and as shown on the approved construction documents. b. Construction traffic shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no construction allowed on Federal and State holidays and weekends and holidays. c. Parking for construction workers shall be identified in the TCP. Except as may be necessary to accommodate specifically approved construction activities, all worker parking shall be directed to an appropriate onsite location, separated from noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site by at least 75 feet. d. Construction staging areas shall be identified for material stockpiles and equipment storage at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction to a distance of at least 75 feet where feasible. e. The applicant shall require their selected contractor to designate a TCP administrator who shall be identified and accessible via phone and email to the County and City throughout all phases of construction and shall perform the following functions: (1) Enforce the provisions of the approved TCP with respect to all phases of construction; (2) Respond within 24 hours to address any concerns communicated by the County, and by the City for work within the City; (3) Monitor truck traffic activity and compliance with the TCP’s designated travel Page 30 of 32    routes, including placing flagmen to direct traffic movements as may be needed for safety purposes and to ensure that approved routes are utilized (such as avoiding use of the private segment of Kinross Drive); and (4) Communicate on a regular basis with the qualified acoustical professional retained to monitor construction noise pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP), and work with the County to implement any needed adjustments to the TCP for compliance with MMRP requirements. 103. The applicant shall survey the baseline pavement condition on access roads and haul routes to be used prior to the commencement of any work on site. The survey shall include a video tape of the roadways. 104. The applicant shall prepare an analysis to estimate the wear the hauling operation will cause to the pavement during construction of the project and to estimate the cost of restoring pavement on any roads, easements, and/or rights-of-way to meet or exceed pre-project conditions. Prior to issuance of the first Building Permit the applicant shall execute a bonded road improvement agreement to assure the roadway repairs. The amount shall be subject to approval by the County Public Works Department and/or the City of Walnut Creek, as applicable, based on the jurisdiction of the facility in question,  105. Within 6 months following construction of the project, the applicant shall construct repairs necessary to restore any roads, easements, and/or rights-of-way to meet or exceed pre-project conditions.   Drainage Area Fee Ordinance 106. A small portion of the project lies within formed Drainage Area 8. The applicant shall comply with the drainage fee requirements for Drainage Area 8 as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The fee shall be paid prior to filing of a parcel map (if deemed necessary) or prior to building permit issuance, whichever occurs first. Sub-regional Park Maintenance Financing Page 31 of 32    107. Prior to filing the Parcel Map, the property owner(s) shall annex the subject property into County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (Contra Costa Centre Area – Park Maintenance). All associated costs relative to the request and processing of the annexation shall be borne by said owner(s). ADVISORY NOTES ADVISORY NOTES ARE NOT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; THEY ARE PROVIDED TO ALERT THE APPLICANT TO ADDITIONAL ORDINANCES, STATUTES, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. A. NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, ASSESSMENTS, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the Applicant has the opportunity to protest fees, dedications, reservation, or exactions required as part of this project approval. To be valid, a protest must be in writing pursuant to Government Code section 66020 and must be delivered to the Community Development Division within a 90-day period that begins on the date that this Project is approved. If the 90th day falls on a day that the DCD is closed, then the protest must be submitted by the end of the next business day. B. The Applicant should be aware of applicable expiration dates and renewing requirements prior to recording the Parcel Map. C. It is unlawful to engage in business in the unincorporated area of the County without first procuring a business license from the County Tax Collector following CDD approval of this application. D. Prior to commencement of the use approved under this permit and approval, the Applicant may wish to contact the following agencies to determine if additional requirements and/or additional permits are required as part of the proposed Project:  County Building Inspection Division  Central Contra Costa Sanitary District  California Department of Fish and Wildlife  City of Walnut Creek  Contra Costa Water District  United States Army Corp of Engineers  Regional Water Quality Control Board Page 32 of 32    E. Applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Central County Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Payment is required prior to issuance of a building permit. F. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Department of Fish and Wildlife. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife of any proposed construction within this development that may affect any fish and wildlife resources, per the Fish and Game Code. G. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the appropriate district of the Corps of Engineers to determine if a permit is required, and if it can be obtained. H. This project may be subject to the requirements of the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. It is the applicant's responsibility to determine if a permit is required. I. The Stormwater Control Plan has been determined to be preliminarily complete, it remains subject to future revision, as necessary, during preparation of improvement plans to bring it into full compliance with C.3 stormwater requirements. LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbing Dirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULEOFFER OF DEDICATION AREALENGTH:1,860± LINEAR FEETAREA:2.4± ACRESWIDTH:VARIES 20'-100'±SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROADKINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUEWALNUT CREEKCHANNELWALNUTBOULEVARD N SAN CARLOS DRIVESPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPNOVEMBER 22ND, 20221646 N. CALIFORNIA BLVDSUITE 400WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596(925) 940-2200www.bkf.comC8.0OFFER OFDEDICATIONEXHIBIT A TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Attachment D Resolution No. 2022/410 General Plan Amendment THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/410 The Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Approving a General Plan Amendment (County File #CDGP20-00001) for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on November 29, 2022, to consider the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, proposed for the the unincorporated Walnut Creek area. The Project includes the certification of an EIR and adoption of a Mitgation Monitoring and Reporting program prepared for the Project, a General Plan Amendment (County File #CDGP20-00001), a rezoning ordinance (County File #CDRZ20-03255), a minor subdivision (County File #CDMS20-00007), a Preliminary and Final Development Plan (County File #CDDP20-03018), and a Land Use Permit (County File #CDLP20-02038). 1. The General Plan Amendment for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project reclassifies land from General Agricultural (A-2) to Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC). 2. The General Plan Amentment for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project is the fourth General Plan Amendment fpr the calendar year 2022. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors resolves as follows: The Board of Supervisors makes the following General Plan Amendment findings: Adoption of the proposed General Plan amendment (GPA) is consistent with the provisions of the Urban Limit Line (ULL). No change to the ULL would occur and the Project does not require extension of urban services beyond the ULL. The subject site is located inside the ULL, and therefore may be developed with “urban” and “non-urban” uses, as defined in the 2005-2020 Contra Costa County General Plan. The proposed land use designation, Congregate Care (CC), is urban. A. Adoption of the proposed GPA will not result in a violation of the 65/35 Land Preservation Standard (the “65/35 Standard”), established through voter adoption of Measure C-1990 and reaffirmed through adoption of Measure L-2006. Under the 65/35 Standard, no more than 35 percent of the land in the county may be developed with urban uses and at least 65 percent of the land must be preserved for non-urban uses such as agriculture, open space, parks, wetlands, etc. The existing land use designation for the subject site, Single-Family Residential Medium Density (SM), is an urban land use designation. No non-urban land use designations are present on-site. The proposed CC land use designation is also an urban designation. Therefore, the percentage of land with urban and non-urban designations will not change as a result of the GPA. B. The Project complies with the objectives and requirements of Measure J-2004, the Contra Costa Growth Management Program (GMP), and related Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) resolutions. The CCTA GMP Implementation Guide (2021) sets forth procedures for local agency consultation and evaluation of impacts related to proposed GPAs. The Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project would generate fewer than 100 a.m. or p.m. peak hour trips and would not impact a Route of Regional Significance. The project is therefore exempt from the GMP GPA Review Process. Regardless, the DEIR was referred to TRANSPAC, the Regional Transportation Planning Committee for Central Contra Costa County, for review and comment. No comments were submitted. C. Adoption of the proposed GPA will not cause the General Plan to become internally inconsistent. The General Plan comprises an integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement of policy governing land use in the unincorporated areas of the county. The existing SM land use designation allows for single-family residential development across the subject site. The proposed CC designation allows for more intense development over the D. 1. same area. Changing the land use designation from SM to CC does not affect or conflict with the policies applicable to the site, nor does it otherwise amend the General Plan. Adoption of the proposed GPA is in the public interest. The existing SM land use designation allows for development of approximately 112 single-family homes, and possibly up to 166 homes with a density bonus consideration. The SM designation was applied to the subject site over 30 years ago, when demand for new housing, particularly senior housing, was less acute. California is in the midst of a housing crisis and redesignation of the site to CC allows for development of 354 independent living units for seniors (a 216 percent increase over the base SM density), plus 100 assisted living units including 33 skilled nursing beds and 23 memory care units. E. Contact: Sean Tully, 925-655-2878 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Attachment E General Plan Change Map WalnutCreek WalnutCreek Oak RdCherryLn M a r c h b a n k s D rN San CarlosDrKinrossDr Gilboa Dr S is k iy o u D rWalden Rd Cora Ct Matterhorn D r Wa lnu t B lvd Ki n gsO ak Pl Allegheny DrWestcliffeLnKingston Pl PyreneesPlFran ces Way A d i r o n d a c k W a y Home-steadAve Seven Hills Ranch Rd SM SM MH SM PS OS PR SM Map Created 10/07/2022by Contra Costa County Department ofConservation and Development, GIS Group30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 9455337:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W 0 550 1,100275Feet This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation andDevelopment with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization'stax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility forits accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information. APN's:172-080-007 and 172-150-012General Plan Amendment (CDGP20-00001)General Plan Designations WalnutCreek WalnutCreek Oak RdCherryLn M a r c h b a n k s D rN San Carlos DrKinross Dr Gilboa Dr S is k iy o u D rWalden Rd Cora Ct Matterhorn D r ParnellCt Wa lnu t B lvd Kings O akP l Allegheny Dr Westcliffe LnKingston Pl PyreneesPlFra nces Way A d i r o n d a c k W a y ClubViewTer Homestead Ave Seven Hills Ranch Rd SM CC MH SM PS OS PR SM Current General Plan SITE SITE Project Site Parcels Walnut Creek City LimitsGeneral Plan Designations CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) PS (Public/Semi-Public) OS (Open Space) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) PR (Parks and Recreation)Proposed General Plan Attachment F Ordinance No. 2022-36 Rezoning City of Walnut Creek R-15 A-2 R-12 R-15 A-2 A-2 R-15 R-15 CherryLn Gilboa Dr Cora Ct M a rc h b a n k s D r M atte r h o r n DrKinrossDr Kings O akPl Allegheny DrRanch R d PyreneesPlFra n ces Way A d i r o n d a c k W a y Lommel Ct HomesteadAveWalnu tBlvd N San Carlos DrSeven H ills WaldenRdIron HorseTrailORDINANCE NO._____________ (Re-Zoning Land in the __________________________ Area) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows: Pages _______________ of the County's 2005 Zoning Map (Ord. No. 2005-03) is amended byre-zoning the land in the above area shown shaded on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated herein (see also Department of Conservation and Development File No. _____________________ .) FROM: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) TO: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) and the Department of Conservation and Development Director shall change the Zoning Map accordingly, pursuant to Ordinance Code Sec. 84.2.002. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it inthe __________________________________ , a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on ________________by the following vote: Supervisor SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION I: Aye No Absent Abstain 1. J. Gioia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2. C. Andersen ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3. D. Burgis ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4. K. Mitchoff ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )5. F.D. Glover ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ATTEST: Monica Nino, County Administratorand Clerk of the Board of Supervisors __________________________________________________ Chair of the BoardBy__________________________________, Dep. (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO._____________ RZ20-3255 - Loewke Planning Associates 2022-36 Contra Costa Centre M-14 RZ20-3255 A-2R-15 P-1 General AgricultureSingle Family Residential Planned Unit District 2022-36 Page 1 of 1 Attachment G Zoning Change Map WalnutCreek WalnutCreek R-15 A-2 R-12 P-1 P-1 R-12 R-15 R-15 Oak RdCherryLn M a r c h b a n k s D rN San CarlosDrKinrossDr Gilboa Dr S is k iy o u D rWalden Rd Cora Ct Matterhorn D r Wa lnu t B lvd Ki n gsO ak Pl Allegheny DrWestcliffeLnKingston Pl PyreneesPlFran ces Way A d i r o n d a c k W a y Homestead Ave Seven Hills Ranch Rd Map Created 10/07/2022by Contra Costa County Department ofConservation and Development, GIS Group30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 9455337:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W 0 550 1,100275Feet This map was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation andDevelopment with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization'stax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility forits accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information. APN's: 172-080-007 and 172-150-012Rezoning (CDRZ20-03255)Zoning Districts R-15 R-12 P-1 P-1 R-12 R-15 A-2 A-2 P-1 WalnutCreek WalnutCreek Oak RdCherryLn M a r c h b a n k s D rN San Carlos DrKinross Dr Gilboa Dr S is k iy o u D rWalden Rd Cora Ct Matterhorn D r ParnellCt Wa lnu t B lvd Kings O akP l Allegheny Dr Westcliffe LnKingston Pl PyreneesPlFra nces Way A d i r o n d a c k W a y ClubViewTer Homestead Ave Seven Hills Ranch Rd Current Zoning Proposed Zoning SITE SITE Project Site Parcels Walnut Creek City Limits Zoning R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) A-2 (General Agriculture) P-1 (Planned Unit) Attachment H Environmental Impact Report (EIR) The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project are available for review and download by accessing the “Environmental Impact Report” tab on the County’s Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project webpage via the link below: https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/7911/Spieker-Senior-Continuing-Care Attachment I Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project Contra Costa County, California State Clearinghouse Number 2021070517 Prepared for: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553-4601 County File Numbers: CDGP20-00001 CDRZ20-03255 CDMS20-00007 CDDP20-03018 CDLP20-02038 Date: October 10, 2022 Page 1 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.1 – Aesthetics MM AES-4.1: A lighting plan for any proposed exterior lighting shall be submitted to the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division for review and approval and include the following: a) Exterior lighting must be directed downward and away from adjacent properties and public/private right-of way to prevent glare or excessive light spillover. Lighting bulbs must be limited to low intensity lights, including lighting for identification purposes. b) No free standing light poles (except those used within building interior courtyards and for internal roadway lighting) will be allowed within the project site. Landscaping lights must be limited to ground-level for walking/safety purposes. c) If any lighting is proposed for the construction staging area, lighting must also be directed downward and away from adjacent properties. Lighting intensity may not be greater than what is reasonably required to safely illuminate the staging area. Submittal of lighting plan Prior to issuance of building permit DCD Page 2 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.3 – Air Quality MM AIR-1.1: Enhanced BAAQMD Best Management Practices: The project shall implement the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD’s) recommended best management practices (BMPs) and additional measures to reduce construction equipment exhaust emissions. These measures shall include the following: a) All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered three times a day and at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12 percent. Moisture content shall be verified by lab samples or moisture probe. b) All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. c) All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using a wet power vacuum street sweeper at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping shall be prohibited. d) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e) All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. Incorporation of Best Management Practices into project construction documents Submittal of photographic proof of implementation of control measures (dust complaint sign, idling time signs) Prior to issuance of building permit Prior to issuance of building permit DCD Page 3 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification f) Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to two minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g) Use interior coatings with no more than 88 grams per liter volatile organic compounds (VOC) (i.e., ROG) and exterior coatings with no more than 132 grams per liter VOC (i.e., ROG) to reduce daily emissions by at least 12 percent. Coating must also meet or exceed BAAQMD requirements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coatings). Alternatively, the project could submit a plan to demonstrate that overall VOC content of architectural coatings would be at least 12 percent below BAAQMD requirements. h) Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. i) All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph and visible dust extends beyond site boundaries. j) Wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) shall be installed on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction Page 4 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification adjacent to sensitive receptors. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity. k) Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast-germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established. l) The simultaneous occurrence of excavation, grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited. Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time. m) Avoid tracking of visible soil material on to public roadways by employing the following measures if necessary: (1) Site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from public paved roads shall be treated with a six to 12-inch compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel and (2) washing truck tires and construction equipment prior to leaving the site. n) Sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent. MM AIR-1.2: Selection of Construction Equipment: Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits, the project applicant shall retain a qualified consultant to develop a plan demonstrating that the off-road equipment used on-site to construct the project would achieve a fleet-wide average 72 percent reduction in diesel particulate matter (DPM) exhaust emissions or greater and a fleet-wide average 16 percent reduction in NOX or greater. This is the minimum reduction Submittal of emissions- reduction plan Incorporation into project construction documents Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits Project’s qualified air quality consultant reporting to DCD Page 5 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification required to reduce the project impacts (i.e., NOX emissions and cancer risk) to a less than significant level. The feasible plan to achieve this reduction would include the following: a) All diesel-powered off-road equipment, larger than 25 horsepower, operating on the site for more than two days continuously shall, at a minimum, meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) particulate matter emissions standards for Tier 4 interim engines. Where Tier 4 equipment is not available, exceptions could be made for equipment that includes California Air Resources Board (CARB)-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters or equivalent. Equipment that is electrically powered or uses non-diesel fuels would also meet this requirement. Section 3.4 – Biological Resources MM BIO-1.1: Pre-Construction Bat Surveys: A pre-activity survey for roosting bats shall be conducted at the two valley oaks (Quercus lobata) that support suitable roost habitat near the northeastern and southeastern corners of the project site within 14 days prior to the onset of ground-disturbing activities. A qualified biologist will conduct a survey to look for evidence of bat use within suitable habitat. If evidence of use is observed, or if high- quality roost sites (e.g., a tree with a large cavity) are present in areas where evidence of bat use might not be detectable, an evening visual survey combined with a nighttime acoustic survey Preconstruction survey by a qualified biologist; results and submittal of survey documents for review and approval No more than 14 days prior to ground disturbance or tree removal Project’s qualified biologist reporting to DCD Page 6 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification shall be conducted to determine if roosting bats are present and to identify the specific location of such bats. If no roosting bats are located, project work can continue as planned. If a maternity roost is detected, a disturbance-free buffer zone (determined by a qualified biologist) shall be implemented during the maternity roost season (March 15–August 31). No project- related activities shall take place within the buffer during the maternity season. If an active non-breeding bat roost is located, project work shall be redesigned to avoid removal or disturbance of the occupied tree. No buffer from the roost shall be necessary during the nonmaternity season (September 1–March 14). If the roost tree itself must be removed, bats shall be passively excluded from roost habitat with one-way devices, or trees will be removed using a two-step tree removal process. The two-step process shall be initiated if exclusion with one-way devices is not feasible due to height of the roost. For the two-step process, trees shall be removed over a two-day period. On day 1, all non-suitable limbs shall be removed, and on day 2, the remainder of the tree shall be removed. Removing trees in this way creates disturbance that encourages bats to vacate the tree before the potential habitat is removed. Either method shall be monitored by a qualified biologist with knowledge of bat ecology and experience with bat exclusion methods. Page 7 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification MM BIO-1.2: Pre-construction surveys for western burrowing owl shall be conducted in accordance with the March 7, 2012, CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If preconstruction surveys find active nests avoidance and minimization guidelines (such as site surveillance, buffers, translocation, artificial burrows, or habitat replacement) must be developed prior to the start of construction in accordance with the March 7, 2012, CDFW memo, and through consultation with CDFW. Preconstruction survey by a qualified biologist; results and submittal of survey documents for review and approval Prior to ground disturbance or construction Project’s qualified biologist reporting to DCD and consulting with CDFW MM BIO-1.3: Avoidance and Nesting Inhibition: To the extent feasible, construction activities (or at least the commencement of such activities) shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season. If construction activities are scheduled to take place outside the nesting season, all impacts on nesting birds protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code shall be avoided. The nesting season for most birds in Contra Costa County extends from February 1 through August 31. If construction activities will not be initiated until after the start of the nesting season, all potential nesting substrates (e.g., bushes, trees, grasses, and other vegetation) that are scheduled to be removed by the project shall be removed prior to the start of the nesting season (e.g., prior to February 1). This will preclude the initiation of nests in this vegetation, and prevent the potential Tree removal or preconstruction survey by a qualified biologist; results and submittal of survey documents for review and approval Prior to tree removal, or issuance of grading or demolition permit Project’s arborist or qualified biologist reporting to DCD Page 8 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification delay of the project due to the presence of active nests in these substrates. MM BIO-1.4: Pre-Construction Bird Surveys: If not possible to schedule construction activities between September 1 and January 31, pre-construction nesting bird surveys shall be completed by a qualified biologist no more than seven days before construction begins. During this survey, the biologist or ornithologist shall inspect all trees and other possible nesting habitats in and within 250 feet of the project boundary. If an active nest is found in an area that would be disturbed by construction, the biologist shall designate an adequate buffer zone (typically 300 feet for raptors and 100 feet for other species) to be established around the nest, in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The buffer would ensure that nests shall not be disturbed until the young have fledged (left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts. The applicant shall submit a report indicating the results of the survey and any designated buffer zones to the satisfaction of the Department of Conservation and Development, prior to the removal of trees and issuance of a grading permit or demolition permit. Preconstruction survey by a qualified biologist; results and submittal for review and approval No more than 7 days prior to tree removal, or issuance of a grading or demolition permit Project’s qualified biologist reporting to DCD, and in consultation with CDFW, as necessary Page 9 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification MM BIO-2.1: Avoidance and Minimization: Prior to the start of construction the property owner or project sponsor shall clearly delineate riparian habitat to be avoided with fencing around the dripline of the riparian canopy. Further indirect impacts to riparian habitat shall be avoided by implementing the following measures during construction: a) Existing native vegetation shall be retained by removing only as much vegetation as necessary to accommodate the new road. Any vegetation removed shall be replaced per MM BIO-2.2 below. b) Temporary disturbance or removal of riparian vegetation shall not exceed the minimum necessary to complete the work. Any vegetation removed shall be replaced per MM BIO-2.2 below. c) Exposed soil shall be controlled by stabilizing slopes (e.g., with erosion control blankets) and protecting channels (e.g., using silt fences or straw wattles). d) Site ingress/egress locations shall be stabilized (e.g., with erosion control blankets). Submittal of photographic evidence of fencing installation. Incorporation into project construction documents Prior to issuance of a grading or demolition permit DCD MM BIO-2.2: Compensatory Mitigation for Permanent Loss of Riparian Habitat: For areas that are not able to be avoided, the property owner or project sponsor shall restore or enhance an equivalent area at a 2:1 (mitigation:impact) ratio, on an acreage basis (or as otherwise directed by a regulatory agency with Submittal of Riparian and Aquatic Habitat HMMP Submittal of ecologist or regulatory agency statement Prior to issuance of a grading permit (HMMP submittal) Project’s qualified restoration ecologist reporting to DCD Page 10 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification regulatory authority over impacts to riparian habitat on the site). Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a Riparian and Aquatic Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Riparian and Aquatic HMMP) for aquatic and riparian habitat creation as a means of compensatory mitigation. The Riparian and Aquatic HMMP shall be prepared by a qualified restoration ecologist and shall provide, at a minimum, the following items: a) Habitat impacts summary and proposed habitat mitigation actions. b) Goals of the restoration to achieve no net loss. c) The location of the mitigation sites and existing site conditions. d) Mitigation design including: o Proposed site construction schedule. o Description of existing and proposed soils, hydrology, geomorphology and geotechnical stability. o Site preparation and grading plan. o Invasive species eradication plan. o Soil amendments and other site preparation. o Planting plan (plant procurement/propagation/installation). o Maintenance plan. verifying restoration implemented per HMMP Prior to building occupancy inspection (proof of HMMP implementation) Page 11 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification e) Monitoring measures, and performance and success criteria. At a minimum, success criteria shall include at least 70 percent cover by native, woody riparian vegetation by year five. f) Monitoring methods, duration, and schedule. g) Contingency measures and remedial actions. h) Reporting measures. The mitigation shall be deemed complete and the applicant released from further responsibilities when the final success criteria have been met, or when the mitigation is deemed complete as determined by applicable regulatory/resource agencies. MM BIO-3.1: Construction Best Management Practices: The central drainage and associated seasonal wetlands that are to be avoided by the project design will be protected from construction activities through implementation of best management practices (BMPs) such as installing silt fencing between jurisdictional waters and project related activities, locating staging and laydown areas away from potentially jurisdictional features, and isolating construction work areas from any identified jurisdictional features. In addition, site stormwater treatment features must be designed consistent with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit as described above, and shall be Incorporation into project construction documents Submittal of photographic evidence of fence installation Prior to issuance of a grading or demolition permit DCD and County Public Works Dept. Page 12 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification placed in locations to treat runoff from the developed portion of the site before entering avoided wetlands. To the extent feasible, existing site drainage patterns in the vicinity of avoided wetlands shall be preserved to prevent indirect alterations to surface hydrology that may contribute to supporting the wetlands. MM BIO-3.2: Compensatory Mitigation for Permanent Loss of Wetlands: To compensate for the perennial drainage and seasonal wetlands that will be permanently impacted by extension of Kinross Drive to the project site, the project proponent shall implement one of the following, in agreement with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) as per permit requirements. a) Acquisition of equivalent wetlands and waters at a nearby site at a ratio of 2:1, on an acreage basis; b) Purchase of mitigation credits at a mitigation bank; c) Enhancement of seasonal wetlands and the perennial drainage to be preserved in the central portion of the site, as well as creation of seasonal wetland habitat, at a ratio of 2:1, on an acreage basis; d) An alternative to be agreed upon with the USACE and RWQCB. Submittal of agreement with USACE and RWQCB and proof of acquisition/ purchase and/or enhancements on-site Prior to issuance of a grading permit (agreement) Prior to building occupancy inspection (proof of acquisition, purchase, or enhancement) USACE, San Francisco Bay RWQCB, and DCD Page 13 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.5 – Cultural Resources MM CUL-2.1: Construction Worker Training: Worker Awareness Training for cultural resources shall be provided to members of the construction excavation and grading team. Training shall consist of the preparation of an alert sheet that would provide guidance and procedures in the event of an unexpected discovery of cultural materials with photographs of typical artifact that shall be exposed coupled with a briefing of the construction crew. Submittal of evidence of contract/agreement for training services Prior to project grading. DCD MM CUL-2.2: Undiscovered Archaeological Resources: If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected cultural resource as defined by CEQA Guideline Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity (“midden”), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, worked bone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) is discovered during construction related earth-moving activities, all ground-disturbing activity within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and the County Department of Conservation and Development be notified. The project sponsor shall hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a field investigation. The County shall consult with the archaeologist to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by a qualified archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary Submittal of proof of discovery clause in construction contracts If cultural resources are identified on-site: Project applicant to notify DCD of materials encountered and provide archaeologist’s submittal of findings and documentation: Section 15064.5 permit(s); copy of DPR 523 forms Prior to construction (discovery clause in contract) and during construction (notification of find) Project’s qualified archaeologist reporting to the DCD Page 14 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification of the Interior’s Standards for Archaeological documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-J) form and filed with the NWIC. MM CUL-2.3: Report of Archaeological Resources: If archaeological resources are identified, a final report summarizing the discovery of cultural materials shall be submitted to the County Department of Conservation and Development prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. This report shall contain a description of the mitigation program that was implemented and its results, including a description of the monitoring and testing program, a list of the resources found and conclusion, and a description of the disposition/curation of the resources. Submittal of final report Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy Project’s qualified archaeologist reporting to the DCD MM CUL-3.1: Human Remains: If human remains are discovered during project construction, all ground-disturbing activity within 100 feet of the resources shall be halted and the County Department of Conservation and Development and the Contra Costa County coroner shall be notified immediately, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined by the County coroner to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified within 24 hours, and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The project sponsor shall also retain a professional Project applicant to notify County Coroner if human remains are encountered; County Coroner contacts NAHC and submits NAHC correspondence to the DCD During construction in the event human remains are discovered Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff: Coroner’s Division, NAHC, DCD Page 15 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the specific site and consult with the Most Likely Descendant, if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the Most Likely Descendant, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. Contra Costa County shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(e) and Public Resources Code section 5097.98. The project sponsor shall implement approved mitigation, to be verified by Contra Costa County and as determined appropriate by the NAHC, before the resumption of ground-disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered. Section 3.7 - Geology and Soils MM GEO-1.1: Design-level Geotechnical Compliance: The applicant shall prepare a site-specific, design-level geotechnical investigation for the project. The design-level geotechnical report shall include, but not be limited to, the following considerations: a) The 2019 CBC classification of the site as being located in Site Class B or C shall be determined. Building foundations, retaining walls, and structural framing requirements will be impacted by the Site Classification. Submittal of design-level geotechnical report for the DCD and County Geologist’s review and approval; approval of final grading and building plans by the County Geologist Prior to issuance of grading and building permits DCD; Contra Costa County Geologist Page 16 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification b) The central portion of the site is underlain by artificial fill and colluvial soils that are more than 17 feet deep. The liquefaction potential of these underlying soils shall be evaluated. c) More detailed evaluation of the excavation characteristics of the sandstone and claystone bedrock underlying the site shall be performed. The excavation characteristics of the bedrock will impact cut grading and excavations for underground utilities and foundations. d) Final recommendations for grading shall be provided, including permanent and temporary slope inclinations, differential fill thickness for building pads, fill construction, and the extent of colluvial and artificial soil removal. e) The impacts from the on-site expansive soils on proposed structures, pavements, and flatwork shall be addressed. f) The design and construction of valley drains and subdrains in fill keyways and benches shall be addressed. g) Potential water seepage through rock fractures, daylighting from cut slopes and into utility trenches shall be assessed. h) Pseudostatic seismic loads will need to be incorporated into the design of retaining walls which will be more than six feet tall, as specified in the CBC. All recommendations by the engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer shall be incorporated into the final design. Recommendations that are applicable to foundation design, earthwork, and site preparation that were prepared prior to or Page 17 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification during the project design phase, shall be incorporated in the project. All foundations and other project structures that require building permits must be compliant with the provisions of the California Building Code. Construction drawings for the project, including seismic design factors, shall be subject to technical review and approval by the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development prior to issuance of construction permits. MM GEO-6.1: Paleontological Monitoring. Construction activities involving excavation or other soil disturbance within the project site shall be required to retain a qualified Paleontological Monitor as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) (2010) equipped with necessary tools and supplies to monitor all excavation, trenching, or other ground disturbance. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and collected. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a copy of the executed contract or other evidence that paleontological monitoring services have been retained, shall be provided to the County for review. Submittal of evidence of contract /agreement for monitoring during soil- disturbing activities and meeting attendance by qualified paleontologist Submittal of final report Prior to building or grading permit issuance (monitoring contract) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy (final report submittal) Project’s qualified paleontologist reporting to the DCD Page 18 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Prior to beginning construction activities, the Principal Paleontologist shall attend a preconstruction meeting to identify specific areas on the project site where paleontological monitoring will be required and shall provide training to construction personnel on how to identify potentially significant fossils. The Principal Paleontologist will periodically assess monitoring results and if no significant fossils have been exposed after fifty percent of excavation, the Principal Paleontologist may determine that monitoring is no longer necessary. MM GEO-6.2: Inadvertent Discovery of Fossils. If fossils are discovered during excavation, the Principal Paleontologist or his/her designated representative will make a preliminary taxonomic identification and determine if the find is significant. For significant/ potentially significant fossil finds, the Paleontologist shall provide a written recommendation to the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development if further action is required, and provide recommended measures for any further evaluation, fossil collection, or protection of the resource. Any subsequent paleontologic work shall be approved by the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development and completed as quickly as possible to avoid damage to the fossils and delays in construction schedules. At a minimum, for significant fossils, the paleontological staff will assign a unique field number to each specimen identified; photograph the specimen and its geographic and stratigraphic context along with a scale near the specimen and its field number Submittal of proof of discovery clause in construction contracts Paleontologist applicant to notify the DCD of materials encountered and report to be submitted to repository museum Prior to building or grading permit issuance (discovery clause) Subsequent to a paleontological resource discovery (notification of find, report of mitigation monitoring efforts) Project’s qualified paleontologist reporting to the DCD Page 19 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification clearly visible in close-ups; record the location using a global positioning system (GPS), record the field number and associated specimen data (identification by taxon and element, etc.) and corresponding geologic and geographic site data (location, elevation, etc.) in the field notes and in a daily monitoring report; stabilize and prepare all fossils for identification, and identify to lowest taxonomic level. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected shall be prepared to a point ready for curation. Preparation shall include the careful removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing and repairing specimens, as necessary. Following laboratory work, all fossil specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level, cataloged, analyzed, and delivered to an accredited museum repository for permanent curation and storage. The cost of curation is assessed by the repository and is the responsibility of the project proponent. A report to be submitted to the repository museum documenting the results of the paleontological mitigation monitoring efforts associated with the project shall be prepared by the Principal Paleontologist. The report shall include a summary of the field and laboratory methods, an overview of the project site geology and paleontology, a list of taxa recovered, an analysis of fossils recovered and their scientific significance, and recommendations. Page 20 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials MM HAZ-2.1: Conduct Asbestos and Lead Surveys Prior to Demolition. Prior to the issuance of demolition permits for the two existing residences and associated structures, the applicant shall retain a licensed professional to conduct asbestos and lead paint surveys. These surveys shall be conducted prior to the disturbance or removal of any suspect asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint, and these materials shall be characterized for asbestos and lead by a reliable method. All activities involving asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint shall be conducted in accordance with governmental regulations, and all removal shall be conducted by properly licensed abatement contractors. Submittal of qualified contractor’s determination of presence or absence of asbestos or lead containing materials Submittal of documentation including a certified hazardous waste contractor in demolition plans Prior to issuance of demolition permits (asbestos and lead survey report) If presence of asbestos or lead is confirmed in report (certified contractor documentation) DCD MM HAZ-2.2: PCB Screening Assessment. Prior to the issuance of demolition permits for the existing residences and associated structures, the applicant shall submit a PCB Screening Assessment Form with their permit application. If on-site buildings do contain PCBs that exceed threshold limits, the project applicant shall follow applicable federal and state laws, which may include reporting to such agencies as the EPA, RWQCB, and DTSC, who may require additional sampling and abatement of PCBs consistent with state and federal requirements. Submittal of PCB Screening Assessment Form with permit application Prior to issuance of demolition permits (assessment form) DCD Page 21 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality MM HYD-3.1: In accordance with Division 914 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the project applicant shall collect and convey all stormwater entering and/or originating on this property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system that conveys the stormwater to a natural watercourse. Any proposed diversions of the watershed shall be subject to review by County Public Works Department, and possibly subject to hearing body approval. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit improvement plans for proposed drainage improvements, and a drainage report with hydrology and hydraulic calculations to the Engineering Services Division of the Public Works Department and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for review and approval that demonstrates the adequacy of the on-site drainage system and the downstream drainage system. The applicant shall verify the adequacy at any downstream drainage facility accepting stormwater from this project prior to discharging runoff. If the downstream system(s) is not adequate to handle the Existing Plus Project condition for the required design storm, improvements shall be constructed to make the system adequate. The applicant shall obtain access rights to make any necessary improvements to off-site facilities. Submittal of drainage improvement plans and drainage report Prior to issuance of grading permit County Public Works Department; Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Page 22 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Section 3.13 – Noise and Vibration MM NOI-1.1: A Construction Noise Management Plan shall be prepared by the construction contractor and implemented prior to the start of and throughout construction to reduce noise impacts on the nearby existing land uses. The plan shall establish the procedures the contractor will take to reasonably minimize construction noise at the nearby existing land uses. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures to reduce construction noise levels as low as practical: a) Restrict noise-generating activities including construction traffic at the construction site or in areas adjacent to the construction site to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no construction allowed on federal and State weekends and holidays.\ b) Potential contractors shall be requested to submit information on their noise management procedures and demonstrate a successful track record of construction noise management on prior projects. c) The selected contractor will equip all internal combustion engine driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. d) The selected contractor will prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. Submittal of Construction Noise Management Plan Incorporation into project construction documents Submittal of photo evidence of project liaison contact info posting at site Submittal of copy of notices to property owners Prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and building permits Prior to initiation of demolition, grading, and construction phases (notice to property owners) DCD Page 23 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification e) The selected contractor will locate stationary noise generating equipment such as air compressors or portable power generators as far as practical from sensitive receptors. f) The selected contractor will utilize “quiet” air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists. g) The selected contractor shall limit the allowable hours for the delivery of materials or equipment to the site and truck traffic coming to and from the site for any purpose to Monday through Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. h) The selected contractor will establish construction staging areas and material stockpiles at locations that will create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction to a distance of at least 75 feet, as is feasible. i) The selected contractor will designate a project liaison that will be responsible for responding to noise complaints during the construction phase. The name and phone number of the liaison will be conspicuously posted at construction areas and on all advanced notifications. This person will take steps to resolve complaints, including periodic noise monitoring, if necessary. Results of noise monitoring will be presented at regular project meetings with the project contractor, and the liaison will coordinate with the contractor to modify any construction activities that generated excessive noise levels to the extent feasible. Page 24 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification j) The selected contractor will hold a preconstruction meeting with the job inspectors and the general contractor/on-site project manager to confirm that noise mitigation and practices (including construction hours, construction schedule, and noise coordinator) are completed. k) Prior to the initiating of each phase of the project (e.g. grading, construction) neighboring property owners within 300 feet of construction activity shall be notified in writing of the construction schedule and at least 2 weeks prior to loud noise-generating activities. Notification will include the nature and estimated duration of the activity. l) A qualified acoustical professional shall be retained to address noise concerns, and if needed, to determine if construction noise levels at adjacent property lines are consistent with the findings of the certified EIR. Corrective actions shall be taken to reduce construction noise if inconsistencies are identified. Temporary noise barriers shall be installed during construction phases involving earth moving equipment (e.g., grading operations) where they would be effective in reducing the construction noise impact, when directly adjoining sensitive receptors, such as at the Seven Hills School. An eight-foot plywood noise barrier could reduce noise levels by at least 5 dBA. Page 25 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification MM NOI-1.2: Prior to the issuance of building permits, mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet 50 dBA Leq during daytime hours and 40 dBA Leq during nighttime hours. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained by the project applicant to review mechanical noise as the equipment systems are selected in order to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the noise limits at all adjacent noise sensitive land uses. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to, locating equipment away from noise sensitive locations, selection of equipment that emits low noise levels and/or installation of noise barriers such as enclosures and parapet walls to block the line of sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors. If properly designed and controlled, the combined worst-case noise level due to the operation of on-site noise sources including the project parking lots, mechanical equipment, and maintenance building operations would not be substantially increased with the project and would remain below the 60 dBA Ldn noise and land use compatibility thresholds established for residential land uses by Contra Costa County and the City of Walnut Creek. Incorporation into project construction documents, submittal of mechanical equipment plans Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits Project’s qualified acoustical consultant, reporting to the DCD MM NOI-2.1: The project shall implement the following measures to minimize vibration impacts from construction activities: Incorporation into project construction documents Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits DCD Page 26 of 26 Abbreviations: County Dept. of Conservation and Development, (DCD) SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification a) Avoid the use of vibratory rollers and other heavy construction equipment within 20 feet of existing structures. b) Place operating equipment on the construction site as far as possible from vibration sensitive receptors. c) Use smaller equipment within 20 feet of the perimeter property lines adjoining off site structures to minimize vibration levels below the limits. d) Select demolition methods not involving impact tools within 100 feet of the perimeter property lines adjoining off-site structures. e) Avoid dropping heavy objects or materials near vibration sensitive locations. f) A list of all heavy construction equipment to be used for this project known to produce high vibration levels (tracked vehicles, vibratory compaction, jackhammers, hoe rams, etc.) shall be submitted to the County by the contractor. This list shall be used to identify equipment and activities that would potentially generate substantial vibration and to define the level of effort required for continuous vibration monitoring. Attachment J Project Plans SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OCTOBER 7TH, 2020 A001COVER SHEET SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURE A001 COVER SHEET A011 SITE PLAN A012 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS EXHIBIT A013 DELIVERY & GARBAGE TRUCK ACCESS EXHIBIT VILLAS: A121 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A122 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A123 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A124 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A125 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A131 BUILDING PLANS A151 ENLARGED PLANS A152 ENLARGED PLANS A161 RENDERINGS HEALTH CENTER: A221 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A222 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A231 BUILDING PLANS A232 BUILDING PLANS A241 BUILDING SECTIONS A261 RENDERINGS INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING: A321 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A322 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A323 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A324 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A330 BUILDING PLANS A331 BUILDING PLANS A332 BUILDING PLANS A333 BUILDING PLANS A334 BUILDING PLANS A341 BUILDING SECTIONS A351 ENLARGED PLANS A352 ENLARGED PLANS A353 ENLARGED PLANS A361 RENDERINGS A362 RENDERINGS MAINTENANCE BUILDING: A421 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A431 BUILDING PLANS A432 BUILDING PLANS A461 RENDERINGS CIVIL C1.0 COVER SHEET C3.0 LOTTING PLAN C5.0 UTILITY PLAN C6.0 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN LANDSCAPE L-1 COVER SHEET L-2 PLANT PALETTE L-3 OVERALL ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN L-4 COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT - RLU APARTMENTS L-5 COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT - HEALTH CENTER L-6 RESTORATION CONCEPT PLAN L-7 CROSS SECTIONS L-8 AMENITY/CHARACTER IMAGERY L-9 SITE LIGHTING DIAGRAM UP UPUP UPUPUP HEALTH CENTER-23/ -#2INDEPENDENT LIVING -302/317#3MAINTENANCE BLDG--#4EVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSVILLA 30P31/1#1VILLA 29P2/P22/2#1VILLA 22P1/P22/2#1VILLA 21P41/1#1VILLA 27P2/P22/2#1VILLA 20P1/P22/2#1VILLA 26P2/P22/2#1VILLA 19P1/P22/2#1VILLA 25P1/P22/2#1VILLA 18P1/P22/2#1VILLA 24P1/P22/2#1VILLA 23P1/P22/2#1VILLA 17P31/1#1VILLA 16P1/P12/2#1VILLA 14P31/1#1VILLA 13P1/P22/2#1VILLA 12P1/P12/2#1VILLA 11P1/P22/2#1VILLA 10P41/1#1VILLA 9P2/P22/2#1VILLA 8P2/P22/2#1VILLA 7P2/P22/2#1VILLA 6P2/P22/2#1VILLA 5P1/P22/2#1VILLA 1P41/1#1VILLA 3P1/P22/2#1VILLA 2P1/P22/2#1VILLA 4P1/P22/2#1VILLA 28P31/1#1VILLA 15P41/1#1SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A011SITE PLANEXISTING PRIVATEELEMENTARY SCHOOL08016040EXISTING RESIDENTIALSEVEN HILLS RANCH RDN SAN CARLOS DRIVE BLDG NAMEP1/P22/4#4BUILDING SHEET NUMBER - CORRESPONDS TO A#00 SERIES(FOR REF ONLY, NOT BLDG ADDRESS)NUMBER OF :UNITS / GARAGE PARKING STALLSBUILDING TYPE NAMEVILLA TYPE NUMBER(FOR REF ONLY, NOT BLDG ADDRESS)LegendEVCSELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION LOCATION(INDICATES FULLY-EQUIPPED AND FUTURE CHARGING STATION)Site EntryN SAN CARLOS DRIVEKINROSS DRHOMESTEAD AVE IL BUILDINGCOURTYARDIL BUILDINGCOURTYARDIL BUILDINGPODIUMCOURTYARDSkilled Nursing CourtyardAssisted Living Courtyard UP UPUP UPUPUP 45. 0 '20.0'1 0 . 0 '20.0'20.0'18.2'22.0'35.0'29.9'26.7' 45 . 0 ' 26.0' 1 5 . 0 '20.0'50.0'20.0'26.0'20.0'45. 0 '26.0'26.0'37.0'20.0' 2 0 . 0 '20.0'26.0'26.0'26.0'10.0'26.0'20.0'20.0'26.0'26.0'26.0'26.0'21.7'15.0'15.0'26.0'20.0'SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020EXISTING PRIVATEELEMENTARY SCHOOL08016040EXISTING RESIDENTIALSEVEN HILLS RANCH RDN SAN CARLOS DRIVESite EntryN SAN CARLOS DRIVEKINROSS DRHOMESTEAD AVE A012FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS EXHIBIT Fire Apparatus Access Road150' or less "Hose Pull" AccessLegendSecondary EVASecondary EVAAerial Apparatus AccessSkilled Nursing CourtyardAssisted Living CourtyardFire Truck Turn-AroundFire Truck Turn-AroundBuilding DescriptionIndependent Living BuildingFour stories of residential on-grade and three stories of residential incontruction type V-A over one story of parking in construction type IA.Common Building in construction type I-A and Pool Building in constructiontype III-A.Occupancy:R-2.1, R-4, B, A-Occupancies, S-OccupanciesBuilding Height: 4 Stories; ±49'-0"Fire Sprinkler: NFPA 13Health CenterSkilled Nursing and Assisted Living on one story with Memory Care andAssisted Living on floor below in construction type V-A.Occupancy:I-2, R-2.1, B, A-OccupanciesBuilding Height: 2 Stories; ±32'-0"Fire Sprinkler: NFPA 13VillasOne story of residential and private garage in construction type V-BOccupancy:R-3, UBuilding Height: 1 Story; ±18'-0"Fire Sprinkler: NFPA 13DMaintenance BuildingTwo stories of laundry, offices, workshop, staff break room, and storage inconstruction type V-BOccupancy:A-3, B, F-1, S-1Building Height: 2 Stories; ±36'-0"Fire Sprinkler: NFPA 13Fire Department Access to Enclosed CourtyardPodium Deck accessvia lobby stairCourtyard access through 6'-0" openingvia pair of 3'-0" doors.See A330 for detailsIL BUILDINGCOURTYARDIL BUILDINGCOURTYARDIL BUILDINGPODIUMCOURTYARD UP UPUP UPUPUP UP25.1'51.3'15.9'26.0'SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A013DELIVERY AND GARBAGE TRUCK EXISTING PRIVATEELEMENTARY SCHOOLLoading Space 10'x35'Per County Code Section 82-16.410Delivery Truck Access08016040EXISTING RESIDENTIALEXISTING RESIDENTIALLegendPrimary EntryN SAN CARLOS DRIVESEVEN HILLS RANCH RDKINROSS DRIL BUILDINGCOURTYARDTrash Management PlanProperty management will relocate trash and recycling binsfrom the trash termination rooms in the Health Center andIndependent Living Buildings to the Maintenance Building tobe compacted in the appropriate baler. Management willalso pick up individual trash bins for the Villa buildings asneeded to be compacted. The compacted bins will bestaged in the trash staging area adjacent to theMaintenance Building on trash day for pick-up.Garbage Truck AccessACCESS EXHIBITHealth Center deliveriesreceived in rear loading zone(alternately sized at 20'x 25')Location of trash staging on trash day.See Trash Staging Enlargement.Delivery vehicles that meet verticalclearance requirements makedeliveries in the parking structure.See A130Delivery vehicles that do not meetvertical clearance requirementsmake deliveries at grade.Trash Staging EnlargementTrash Staging AreaTrashCompactorsScale: 1"=30'-0"Maintenance BuildingIL BUILDINGCOURTYARDIL BUILDINGPODIUMCOURTYARD130 438610'-1" ±20'-0" Building HeightTOCTPL3710'-1"TOCTPL347810'-1"TOCTPL33410'-1"TOCTPLSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020048 12A121BUILDING ELEVATIONSVILLA BUILDING TYPE A1. REAR ELEVATION3. FRONT ELEVATION2. LEFT ELEVATION4. RIGHT ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. VINYL WINDOWS8. SHUTTERSNOTE: FINAL EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE VILLA BUILDINGS WILLVARY ACCORDING TO LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON SITE. 10'-1"32448±19'-0" Building HeightTOCTPL10'-1"3267TOCTPL10'-1"3248TOCTPL10'-1"328TOCTPLSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020048 12A122BUILDING ELEVATIONSVILLA BUILDING TYPE B1. REAR ELEVATION3. FRONT ELEVATION2. LEFT ELEVATION4. RIGHT ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. VINYL WINDOWS8. SHUTTERSNOTE: FINAL EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE VILLA BUILDINGS WILLVARY ACCORDING TO LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON SITE. 10'-1"23476±19'-0" Building HeightTOCTPL10'-1"328TOCTPL10'-1"832TOCTPL10'-1"67328TOCTPLSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020048 12A123BUILDING ELEVATIONSVILLA BUILDING TYPE C1. REAR ELEVATION3. FRONT ELEVATION2. LEFT ELEVATION4. RIGHT ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. VINYL WINDOWS8. SHUTTERSNOTE: FINAL EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE VILLA BUILDINGS WILLVARY ACCORDING TO LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON SITE. 10'-1"348±19'-0" Building HeightTOCTPL10'-1"38TOCTPL10'-1"6374TOCTPL10'-1"374TOCTPLSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020048 12A124BUILDING ELEVATIONSVILLA BUILDING TYPE D1. REAR ELEVATION3. FRONT ELEVATION2. LEFT ELEVATION4. RIGHT ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. VINYL WINDOWS8. SHUTTERSNOTE: FINAL EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE VILLA BUILDINGS WILLVARY ACCORDING TO LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON SITE. 10'-1"TOCTPL18523±19'-0" Building Height 10'-1"TOCTPL6213710'-1"TOCTPL183210'-1"TOCTPL286SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A125BUILDING ELEVATIONSVILLA BUILDING TYPE E048 121. REAR ELEVATION3. FRONT ELEVATION2. LEFT ELEVATION4. RIGHT ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. VINYL WINDOWS8. SHUTTERS`NOTE: FINAL EXTERIOR COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE VILLA BUILDINGS WILLVARY ACCORDING TO LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON SITE. Living/DiningMasterBedroomBathGarageBathKitchenBedroomPatioLiving/DiningMasterBedroomBathGarageBathKitchenBedroomPatioLiving/DiningBedroom 1Bedroom2BathGarageKitchenMasterBedroomBathPatioLiving/DiningBedroom 1Bedroom2BathGarageKitchenMasterBedroomBathPatioLiving/DiningBedroom 1Bedroom2BathGarageKitchenMasterBedroomBathPatioLiving/DiningMasterBedroomBathGarageBathKitchenBedroomPatioGarageKitchenCoveredOutdoorPatioMasterBedroomBathGreatRoomDenPowderBedroomBathKitchenGreat RoomBathDenCoveredOutdoorDiningMasterBedroomWICBedroom 2BathPowderYardBedroom 1DenWorkSpaceGaragePatioSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A131BUILDING PLANSINDEPENDENT LIVING VILLAS0 4 816Villa Type AVilla Type DVilla Type BVilla Type CVilla Type E Living/Dining16'-9" x 24'-3"Bedroom 112'-6" x 13'-1"Bedroom 212'-4" x 11'-6"BathGarage17'-4" x 20'-8"LaundryKitchen9'-10" x 16'-2"Master Bedroom16'-0" x 12'-2"Master BathWIC8'-1" x 5'-10"Patio2,089 SFVilla P2Living/Dining15'-0" x 24'-2"Master Bedroom12'-0" x 17'-0"WIC5'-1" x 6'-3"WIC5'-1" x 6'-3"MasterBathGarage13'-6" x 22'-11"BathKitchen9'-6" x 15'-3"Bedroom13'-2" x 11'-8"Patio1,757 SFVilla P1SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A151ENLARGED PLANSINDEPENDENT LIVING VILLAS - UNIT PLANS0 2 48 W.I.C.9'-9" x 9'-2"Garage20'-0" x 20'-3"Kitchen9'-10" x 16'-10"Covered Outdoor Patio16'-7" x 12'-2"Master Bedroom16''-0" x 14'-0"LaundryBathGreat Room25'-11" x 16'-10"Lin.Den12'-4" x 9'-6"PowderFoyerBedroom15'-10" x 12'-2"MasterBathLin.Lin.2,375 SFVilla P3 (Type E)Kitchen13'-3" x 17'-0"Great Room40'-1" x 19'-10"MasterBathDen13'-4" x 10'-0"CoveredOutdoor Dining20'-4" x 8'-10"Master Bedroom14'-0" x 17'-0"LaundryWIC10'-2" x 13'-1"Bedroom 211'-11" x 13'-2"BathPowderYardBedroom 113'-0" x 12'-0"Den11'-11" x 13'-0"WIC6'-9" x 6'-3"WIC7'-1" x 7'-6"Work Space11'-0" x 10'-6"Garage19'-8" x 22'-3"Patio3,202 SFVilla P4 (Type D)SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A152ENLARGED PLANSINDEPENDENT LIVING VILLAS - UNIT PLANS0 2 48 SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A161RENDERINGSINDEPENDENT LIVING VILLAS 9'-1"TOCTPLFF9'-1"TPL±29'-0" Building Height 9'-1"TOCTPLFF9'-1"TPL±29'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020010205A221BUILDING ELEVATIONSHEALTH CENTERMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. SHUTTERS10. METAL STOREFRONT123NTS1. EAST ELEVATION2. SOUTH ELEVATION3. SOUTH ELEVATIONOVERALL SOUTH ELEVATIONKEY PLAN 9'-1"TPLTOC±22'-0" Building Height 9'-1"TPLTOC±20'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020010205A222BUILDING ELEVATIONSHEALTH CENTERMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. SHUTTERS10. METAL STOREFRONTNTSKEY PLAN1. WEST ELEVATION2. NORTH ELEVATION3. NORTH ELEVATIONOVERALL NORTH ELEVATION123112345968 MEMORYCARECOURTCORRIDORNURSE'SOFFICEMC DINING&KITCHENETTEMC LIVINGMCSTAFFMCACTIVITIESBACK OFHOUSEASSISTEDLIVING COURTABOVELOUNGEMCFOYERARTSROOMREST-ROOMSACTIVITIESROOMRECEPTION/MAILLIBRARYRES.LAUNDRYLOUNGESTOR.OFFICESRECREATIONASSISTEDLIVINGDININGNURSESSTATIONSKILLEDNURSINGDININGPHYSICALTHERAPYSKILLEDNURSINGCOURTASSISTEDLIVINGCOURTLOBBYBACK OFHOUSEVESTIBULECOURTYARDBELOWSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A231BUILDING PLANSHEALTH CENTER0204010LEVEL 1LEVEL 0 ASSISTEDLIVING COURTSKILLEDNURSINGCOURTSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A232BUILDING PLANSHEALTH CENTER0204010ROOF ASSISTEDLIVING COURTSKILLED NURSINGCOURTASSISTED LIVINGDININGUNITUNITNURSESSTATIONUNITUNITUNITMEMORYCARECOURTLOBBYOFFICESASSISTEDLIVING COURTUNITUNITUNITMOTOR COURTBACK OF HOUSESPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020010205A241BUILDING SECTIONSHEALTH CENTERNTS1. SECTION A2. SECTION BKEY PLANAABB SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A261RENDERINGSHEALTH CENTER TOC9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL12'-0" Parking ±48'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A321BUILDING ELEVATIONSRLU BUILDING 0102051NTSKEY PLAN21. EAST ELEVATION2. EAST ELEVATIONOVERALL EAST ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULTSHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METALROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. METAL STOREFRONT 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL±38'-0" Building Height 11'-0"TOCTPL9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL±49'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A322BUILDING ELEVATIONSRLU BUILDING 0102051NTSKEY PLAN231. SOUTH ELEVATION2. SOUTH ELEVATION3. SOUTH ELEVATIONOVERALL SOUTH ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULTSHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METALROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. METAL STOREFRONT 11'-0"TOCTPL9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL±49'-0" Building Height 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL±38'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A323BUILDING ELEVATIONSRLU BUILDING 0102051NTSKEY PLAN21. WEST ELEVATION2. WEST ELEVATIONOVERALL WEST ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULTSHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METALROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. METAL STOREFRONT 11'-0"TOCTPL9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"FFTPLFFTPLFFTPL±49'-0" Building HeightSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A324BUILDING ELEVATIONSRLU BUILDING 0102051NTSKEY PLAN231. NORTH ELEVATION2. NORTH ELEVATION3. NORTH ELEVATIONOVERALL NORTH ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULTSHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METALROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. METAL STOREFRONT TheaterDiningBistroMainDiningPriv.DiningMainDiningFoyerPoolFitnessAuditoriumLobbyGrotto-View PatioBBQ PatioUP UP UP UP BarKitchenLobbyLobbyUPUPF.E.C.TrashTerm.TrashTerm.TrashTerm.DeliveriesBike Parking 61 spacesStor. UPSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A330BUILDING PLANSRLU BUILDING - COURTYARD LEVELParking GarageGarageEntry0306015Parking GarageGarageEntryGarageEntryGarageEntryCourtyard-See LandscapeDrawingsCourtyard-See LandscapeDrawingsEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSEVCSFire Department LadderAccess to the Podium DeckFire Department Ladder Access tothe Enclosed CourtyardFire Department Ladder Access tothe Enclosed Courtyard LoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobby DN +3'-10"FFE DNGrandStair EntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCardRoomConf.RoomSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020GarageEntryA331BUILDING PLANSRLU BUILDING - 1ST FLOORCourtyard BelowPodiumCourtyard0306015Courtyard Below ArtStudioSalonLobbyLobbyLobbySPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A332BUILDING PLANSRLU BUILDING - 2ND FLOOR0306015Courtyard BelowPodiumCourtyard BelowCourtyard Below LobbyLobbyLobbySPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A333BUILDING PLANSRLU BUILDING - 3RD FLOOR0306015Courtyard BelowPodiumCourtyard BelowCourtyard BelowSkyDeck SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A334ROOF PLANRLU BUILDING 0306015Courtyard BelowPodiumCourtyard BelowCourtyard BelowSkyDeck COURTYARDPODIUM COURTYARDPARKINGPARKINGPATIOCOURTYARDDININGKITCHENENTRYMOTORCOURTLOUNGEAUDITORIUMFITNESSPOOLMULTI-PURPOSEROOMART STUDIO SALONGRAND STAIRFITNESSPOOLMULTI-PURPOSEROOMART STUDIO SALONSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A341BUILDING SECTIONSRLU BUILDING0 8 1632Key Map N.T.SSECTION ASECTION BSECTION BAABB Bedroom12'-0" x 14'-0"Living /Dining14'-1" x 16'-7"Kitchen8'-10" x 11'-8"BathWICBedroom12'-0" x 15'-0"Living14'-10" x 17'-2"Kitchen /Dining11'-7" x 17'-2"WICBathLiving /Dining15'-2" x 20'-1"Bedroom12'-0" x 14'-0"Kitchen9'-3" x 11'-2"BathWICBedroom12'-0" x 15'-7"Living /Dining14'-1" x 16'-7"Kitchen8'-10" x 11'-8"WICBathDeckDeckDeckDeckSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A351ENLARGED PLANS1-BEDROOM UNIT PLANS0 2 48835 SFUnit Type 1A893 SFUnit Type 1B883 SFUnit Type 1D866 SFUnit Type 1C Master Bedroom 12'-0" x 14'-0" Bedroom 11'-10" x 14'-0" Living /Dining 14'-0" x 16'-7" Kitchen 8'-10" x 11'-8"MasterBath Bath WIC WIC MasterBedroom 12'-0" x 14'-0" Bedroom 11'-6" x 12'-4" Living /Dining 20'-4" x 17'-1" Kitchen 12'-1" x 10'-1" WIC WIC MasterBath Bath Den7'-10" x 8'-0" Deck Deck SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OCTOBER 7TH, 2020 A352ENLARGED PLANS 2-BEDROOM UNIT PLANS0 2 4 8 1,233 SF Unit Type 2A 1,391 SF Unit Type 2B Master Bedroom 12'-8" x 14'-0"Dining 13'-5" x 9'-4" Kitchen13'-5" x10'-1"Living12'-8" x 14'-0" Bedroom 13'-9" x 12'-0" Work Room 14'-0" x 9'-6" WIC MasterBath Bath Laundry Master Bedroom 12'-0" x 14'-0"Bedroom 3 10'-0" x 11'-0" Bedroom 2 11'-0" x 14'-0" Den 7'-10" x 9'-3" Living /Dining 14'-0" x 17'-7" Kitchen 11'-6" x 12'-5" WIC WIC MasterBath Bath Master Bedroom 12'-0" x 14'-0" Bedroom 3 10'-0" x 10'-8" Bedroom 2 11'-7" x 11'-6" Living /Dining 14'-0" x 21'-1" Kitchen 12'-1" x 12'-5" Den 8'-8" x 9'-2" WIC MasterBath Bath Deck Deck Deck SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OCTOBER 7TH, 2020 A353ENLARGED PLANS 3-BEDROOM UNIT PLANS0 2 4 8 1,581 SF Unit Type 3A 1,568 SF Unit Type 3B 1,532 SF Unit Type 3C SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OCTOBER 7TH, 2020 A361RENDERINGS SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OCTOBER 7TH, 2020 A362RENDERINGS 10'-6"10'-3 1/2"TOCTPLFFTPL2736218410'-6"10'-3 1/2"TOCTPLFFTPL±35'-0" Building Height 10'-6"10'-3 1/2"TOCTPLFFTPL10'-6"10'-3 1/2"TOCTPLFFTPL UP UPSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A421BUILDING ELEVATIONSMAINTENANCE BUILDING010205MATERIAL LEGEND1. STUCCO2. FIBER CEMENT SIDING3. FIBER CEMENT SHINGLES4. BRICK VENEER5. STONE VENEER6. COMPOSITE ASPHAULT SHINGLE ROOFING7. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING8. VINYL WINDOWS9. SHUTTERS10. METAL STOREFRONTNTSKEY PLAN1. SOUTH ELEVATION3. NORTH ELEVATION2. EAST ELEVATION4. WEST ELEVATION1342 UP UPDRYDRYDRYERDRYERDRYERDRYERDRYERDRYEROffice OfficeOffice OfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWorkRoomElectricalPlumbingDirtyLaundryCleanLaundryWorkShopTrashCompactorFitnessOfficeOfficeStaffBreakRoomStorageConferenceRoom 2ConferenceRoom 1CentralStorageWomen's Men's Open ToGeneratorBelowOpen ToTrashCompactorsBelowDNDNSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A431BUILDING PLANSMAINTENANCE BUILDING010205LEVEL 1LEVEL 2 Open ToGeneratorDNDNSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A432BUILDING PLANSMAINTENANCE BUILDING010205ROOF SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168Architecture + Planning888.456.5849ktgy.comCONCEPTUAL DESIGNOCTOBER 7TH, 2020A461RENDERINGSMAINTENANCE BUILDING KINROSS DRIVESEVEN HILLS RANCH ROADN SOUTH CARLOS DRIVE680SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C1.0COVER SHEET SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROADTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - MS20-0007UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)KINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUE WALNUT BOULEVARDSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C2.0EXISTING CONDTIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS& TREE REMOVAL PLAN SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)HOMESTEADAVENUE WALNUT BOULEVARDSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C2.1EXISTING CONDITIONS MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C1.2EXISTING CONDITIONS& TREE REMOVAL PLAN MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C1.1SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C2.2EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS& TREE REMOVAL PLAN SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)KINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUENOTESLEGENDSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C3.0LOTTING PLAN LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOffice Office Office Off ice GeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULESEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)KINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUELEGENDABBREVIATIONSEARTHWORK QUANTITIESSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C4.0GRADINGOVERALL GRADING PLAN LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundrySEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)HOMESTEADAVENUELEGENDABBREVIATIONSEARTHWORK QUANTITIESSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C4.1GRADINGWESTERN GRADING PLANMATCH LINE SEE SHEET C4.2 OfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULELEGENDABBREVIATIONSEARTHWORK QUANTITIESMATCH LINE SEE SHEET C4.1SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C4.2GRADINGEASTERN GRADING PLAN LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULESEVEN HILLS RANCH ROAD(FORMERLY WALDEN WAY)KINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUEWALNUT BOULEVARDLEGENDNOTESLEGENDSPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C5.0UTILITY PLAN LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULET2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16T17T18T19T1T20T21T22T23T24T25T27T57T56T55T26T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T38T39T37T40T41T42T43T44T45T46T47T48T49T52T53T54T51T50T36T36LEGENDT49SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C6.0STORMWATER PLAN STORMWATERCONTROL PLAN 1211221SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C6.1STORMWATER PLAN STORMWATERCONTROL PLAN LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbingDirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULESPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPDECEMBER 2ND, 2020C7.0GARBAGE TRUCKTURN JU LY, 2020 L-1XX XX XX COV ER SHEET LEGEND SPECIMEN OAK TREE SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE (N) / LOCAL (L)DROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK 72"/60"/120" BOX 24 L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 60'H x 50'W, DECIDUOUS LEGEND RESIDENTIAL STREET TREE SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG` ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE 24"BOX M N FULL TO PT SHADE, 55'H X 20'W, DECIDUOUS KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE FLAME TREE 24"BOX M N Y FULL SUN, 35'H X 35"W, DECIDUOUS ULMUS CARPINIFOLIA X PARVIFOLIA `FRONTIER` FRONTIER ELM 24"BOX 63 L L Y FULL SUN, 35'H X 25'W, DECIDUOUS LEGEND PARKING LOT TREE SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ACER RUBRUM ‘OCTOBER GLORY’ RED MAPLE 24"BOX 44 M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 40'H X 30'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND EVERGREEN SCREEN TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS ITALIAN CYPRESS 24"BOX 51 L N FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 70'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA PUNK TREE 24"BOX 26 M N FULL SUN, 25'H X 15'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND OPEN SPACE TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES 15 GAL.20 24" BOX 26 15 GAL.40 24"BOX 55 LEGEND COURTYARD TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES OLEA EUROPAEA `SWAN HILL` SWAN HILL OLIVE MULTI-TRUNK 36"BOX VL L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 25'H X 25'W, EVERGREEN QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 36"/48" BOX M L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H x 50'W, EVERGREEN ACER PLATANOIDES NORWAY MAPLE 24" BOX M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 40'H x 30'W, DECIDUOUS KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA GOLDEN RAIN TREE 24"BOX M Y FULL SUN, 30'H 30'W, DECIDUOUS ULMUS PARVIFOLIA `DRAKE` DRAKE CHINESE ELM 24"BOX L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 35'H x 35'W, EVERGREEN CITRUS SPP. ORANGE TREE 24"BOX 12 M Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `MUSKOGEE` MUSKOGEE CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN, 20'H X 15'W, DECIDUOUS PRUNUS SERRULATA ‘KUANZAN’ JAPANESE FLOWERING CHERRY 24"BOX M L Y PT SHADE TO FULL SUN, 25'H X 12'W, DECIDUOUS ROSA FLORIBUNDA `BRILLIANT PINK ICEBERG` ROSE 15 GAL.16 M L N PT TO FULL SUN, 5'H X 5'W, DECIDUOUS ARBUTUS X `MARINA` ARBUTUS STANDARD 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAURUS NOBILIS `SARATOGA` SWEET BAY 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND VILLA TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H x 50'W, EVERGREEN QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 60'H x 50'W, DECIDUOUS CITRUS SPP. ORANGE TREE 24"BOX M Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `MUSKOGEE` MUSKOGEE CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN, 20'H X 15'W, DECIDUOUS ARBUTUS X `MARINA` ARBUTUS STANDARD 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAURUS NOBILIS `SARATOGA` SWEET BAY 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ACER PALMATUM `MORTON` MORTON JAPANESE MAPLE 24"BOX TBD M N FULL TO PT SUN, 10'H X 8'W, DECIDUOUS PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24"BOX TBD M N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H X 35'W, DECIDUOUS AESCULUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA BUCKEYE 24"BOX TBD VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 25'H x 30'W, DECIDUOUS CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 24"BOX TBD VL N Y SUN/PT SHADE 15'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS SALIX LASIOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW 24"BOX TBD H N N FULL SUN, 35'H x 15'W, DECIDUOUS SPECIMEN TREES QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 35 20 15 230 137 99 40 EVERGREEN TREES N Y ACCENT TREES SHADE TREES EVERGREEN TREES ACCENT TREES SHADE TREES FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 60'H x 50'W, DECIDUOUS 82 VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H x 50'W, EVERGREEN QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK L JAPANESE FLOWERING CHERRY 24"BOX M L Y 25'H X 12'W, DECIDUOUS ROSA FLORIBUNDA `BRILLIANT PINK ICEBERG` ROSE 15 GAL.16 M L N PT TO FULL SUN, 5'H X 5'W, DECIDUOUS ARBUTUS X `MARINA` ARBUTUS STANDARD 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAURUS NOBILIS `SARATOGA` SWEET BAY 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND VILLA TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H x 50'W, EVERGREEN QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 60'H x 50'W, DECIDUOUS CITRUS SPP. ORANGE TREE 24"BOX M Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `MUSKOGEE` MUSKOGEE CRAPE MYRTLE 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN, 20'H X 15'W, DECIDUOUS ARBUTUS X `MARINA` ARBUTUS STANDARD 24"BOX L N Y FULL SUN, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LAURUS NOBILIS `SARATOGA` SWEET BAY 24"BOX L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 30'H X 20'W, EVERGREEN LEGEND STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA TREES SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ACER PALMATUM `MORTON` MORTON JAPANESE MAPLE 24"BOX TBD M N FULL TO PT SUN, 10'H X 8'W, DECIDUOUS PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24"BOX TBD M N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 50'H X 35'W, DECIDUOUS AESCULUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA BUCKEYE 24"BOX TBD VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 25'H x 30'W, DECIDUOUS CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 24"BOX TBD VL N Y SUN/PT SHADE 15'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS SALIX LASIOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW 24"BOX TBD H N N FULL SUN, 35'H x 15'W, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVER LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ABUTILON PALMERI INDIAN MALLOW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ACACIA REDOLENS ‘DESERT CARPET’ BANK CATCLAW 1 GAL VL Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 15'W, EVERGREEN ACHILLEA X `FIREFLY PEACH SKY` FIREFLY PEACH SKY YARROW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 2.5'W, PERENNIAL AGAVE ATTENUATA `KARA'S STRIPES` AGAVE 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE SHRUB 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN ARCTOSTAPHYLOS MANZANITA `DR. HURD` DR. HURD MANZANITA 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN CAMELLIA SASANQUA CHRISTMAS CAMELLIA 5 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN CEANOTHUS X `RAY HARTMAN` MULTI-TRUNK CALIFORNIA LILAC 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL VL N Y SUN/PT SHADE 15'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS CISTUS X PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN COLEONEMA PULCHRUM `SUNSET GOLD` GOLDEN BREATH OF HEAVEN 5 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 3'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN DIETES GRANDIFLORA `VARIEGATA` STRIPED FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 4'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICUM `BOWMAN`S #1` CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA 1 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 2'W, DECIDUOUS EPILOBIUM CANUM `CATALINA` CATALINA FUCHSIA 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, DECIDUOUS FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 1 GAL L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA `PERPA` BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON 15 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 10'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN HEUCHERA X `ELECTRIC LIME` CORAL BELLS 1 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN KNIPHOFIA UVARIA `MALIBU YELLOW` MALIBU YELLOW TORCH LILY 5 GAL L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, PERENNIAL LAVATERA MARITIMA TREE MALLOW 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN LIGUSTRUM SINENSE `SUNSHINE` SUNSHINE LIGUSTRUM 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 6'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN LIRIOPE MUSCARI `VARIEGATA` VARIEGATED LILY TURF 1 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA `BREEZE` BREEZE MAT RUSH 1 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN NANDINA DOMESTICA `LEMON LIME` LEMON LIME NANDINA 1GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN NEPETA FAASSENII CATMINT 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 2'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` MAKI SHRUBBY YEW PODOCARPUS 15 GAL M Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 5'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `LEATHERLEAF` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `MOUND SAN BRUNO` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN RIBES VIBURNIFOLIUM EVERGREEN CURRANT 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN ROSA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS 230 137 99 40 EVERGREEN TREES EXISTING TREE TO BE PRESERVED ACCENT TREES SHADE TREES EVERGREEN TREES SALIX LASIOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW 24"BOX TBD H N N FULL SUN, 35'H x 15'W, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVER LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ABUTILON PALMERI INDIAN MALLOW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ACACIA REDOLENS ‘DESERT CARPET’ BANK CATCLAW 1 GAL VL Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 15'W, EVERGREEN ACHILLEA X `FIREFLY PEACH SKY` FIREFLY PEACH SKY YARROW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 2.5'W, PERENNIAL AGAVE ATTENUATA `KARA'S STRIPES` AGAVE 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE SHRUB 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN ARCTOSTAPHYLOS MANZANITA `DR. HURD` DR. HURD MANZANITA 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN CAMELLIA SASANQUA CHRISTMAS CAMELLIA 5 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN CEANOTHUS X `RAY HARTMAN` MULTI-TRUNK CALIFORNIA LILAC 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL VL N Y SUN/PT SHADE 15'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS CISTUS X PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN COLEONEMA PULCHRUM `SUNSET GOLD` GOLDEN BREATH OF HEAVEN 5 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 3'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN DIETES GRANDIFLORA `VARIEGATA` STRIPED FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 4'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICUM `BOWMAN`S #1` CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA 1 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 2'W, DECIDUOUS EPILOBIUM CANUM `CATALINA` CATALINA FUCHSIA 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, DECIDUOUS FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 1 GAL L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA `PERPA` BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON 15 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 10'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN HEUCHERA X `ELECTRIC LIME` CORAL BELLS 1 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN KNIPHOFIA UVARIA `MALIBU YELLOW` MALIBU YELLOW TORCH LILY 5 GAL L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, PERENNIAL LAVATERA MARITIMA TREE MALLOW 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN LIGUSTRUM SINENSE `SUNSHINE` SUNSHINE LIGUSTRUM 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 6'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN LIRIOPE MUSCARI `VARIEGATA` VARIEGATED LILY TURF 1 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA `BREEZE` BREEZE MAT RUSH 1 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN NANDINA DOMESTICA `LEMON LIME` LEMON LIME NANDINA 1GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN NEPETA FAASSENII CATMINT 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 2'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` MAKI SHRUBBY YEW PODOCARPUS 15 GAL M Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 5'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `LEATHERLEAF` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `MOUND SAN BRUNO` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN RIBES VIBURNIFOLIUM EVERGREEN CURRANT 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN ROSA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS ROSA X `FLOWER CARPET APPLEBLOSSOM` ROSE 2 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, DECIDUOUS SALVIA LEUCANTHA `SANTA BARBARA` MEXICAN BUSH SAGE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN SALVIA MICROPHYLLA `HOT LIPS` HOT LIPS SAGE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALKSTICKS 1 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 1'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS GERMANDER 1 GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 1'W, EVERGREEN TEUCRIUM FRUTICANS `AZUREUM` AZURE BUSH GERMANDER 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 5'W, EVERGREEN STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES BOUTELOUA GRACILIS BLUE GRAMA GRASS 1GAL L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 1'W, DECIDUOUS CAREX TUMULICOLA BERKELEY SEDGE 1 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 1'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM `EL CAMPO` CAPE RUSH 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN JUNCUS PATENS `CARMAN`S GREY` SPREADING RUSH 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 2'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN LEYMUS CONDENSATUS `CANYON PRINCE` NATIVE BLUE RYE 1 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN MIMULUS AURANTIACUS STICKY MONKEYFLOWER 5 GAL VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 4'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN EXISTING TREE TO BE PRESERVED SALIX LASIOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW 24"BOX TBD H N N FULL SUN, 35'H x 15'W, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVER LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES ABUTILON PALMERI INDIAN MALLOW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ACACIA REDOLENS ‘DESERT CARPET’ BANK CATCLAW 1 GAL VL Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 15'W, EVERGREEN ACHILLEA X `FIREFLY PEACH SKY` FIREFLY PEACH SKY YARROW 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 2.5'W, PERENNIAL AGAVE ATTENUATA `KARA'S STRIPES` AGAVE 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE SHRUB 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN ARCTOSTAPHYLOS MANZANITA `DR. HURD` DR. HURD MANZANITA 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN CAMELLIA SASANQUA CHRISTMAS CAMELLIA 5 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN CEANOTHUS X `RAY HARTMAN` MULTI-TRUNK CALIFORNIA LILAC 15 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 15'H X 10'W, EVERGREEN CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL VL N Y SUN/PT SHADE 15'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS CISTUS X PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN COLEONEMA PULCHRUM `SUNSET GOLD` GOLDEN BREATH OF HEAVEN 5 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 3'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN DIETES GRANDIFLORA `VARIEGATA` STRIPED FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 4'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICUM `BOWMAN`S #1` CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA 1 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 2'H X 2'W, DECIDUOUS EPILOBIUM CANUM `CATALINA` CATALINA FUCHSIA 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, DECIDUOUS FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 1 GAL L Y SUN OR PT SHADE, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA `PERPA` BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON 15 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 10'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN HEUCHERA X `ELECTRIC LIME` CORAL BELLS 1 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN KNIPHOFIA UVARIA `MALIBU YELLOW` MALIBU YELLOW TORCH LILY 5 GAL L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 4'W, PERENNIAL LAVATERA MARITIMA TREE MALLOW 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN LIGUSTRUM SINENSE `SUNSHINE` SUNSHINE LIGUSTRUM 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 6'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN LIRIOPE MUSCARI `VARIEGATA` VARIEGATED LILY TURF 1 GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA `BREEZE` BREEZE MAT RUSH 1 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN NANDINA DOMESTICA `LEMON LIME` LEMON LIME NANDINA 1GAL M Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 4'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN NEPETA FAASSENII CATMINT 1GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 2'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` MAKI SHRUBBY YEW PODOCARPUS 15 GAL M Y FULL SUN PT SHADE, 10'H X 5'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `LEATHERLEAF` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 8'H X 8'W, EVERGREEN RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `MOUND SAN BRUNO` CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 12'W, EVERGREEN RIBES VIBURNIFOLIUM EVERGREEN CURRANT 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 4'H X 6'W, EVERGREEN ROSA CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE 5 GAL L N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 10'H X 10'W, DECIDUOUS ROSA X `FLOWER CARPET APPLEBLOSSOM` ROSE 2 GAL M L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, DECIDUOUS SALVIA LEUCANTHA `SANTA BARBARA` MEXICAN BUSH SAGE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN SALVIA MICROPHYLLA `HOT LIPS` HOT LIPS SAGE 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALKSTICKS 1 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 1'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS GERMANDER 1 GAL L L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 1'W, EVERGREEN TEUCRIUM FRUTICANS `AZUREUM` AZURE BUSH GERMANDER 5 GAL L L Y FULL SUN, 4'H X 5'W, EVERGREEN STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY.WUCOLS ZONENATIVE PLANTDROUGHT TOLERANTNOTES BOUTELOUA GRACILIS BLUE GRAMA GRASS 1GAL L Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 1'H X 1'W, DECIDUOUS CAREX TUMULICOLA BERKELEY SEDGE 1 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 1'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM `EL CAMPO` CAPE RUSH 5 GAL L L Y SUN OR SHADE, 3'H X 4'W, EVERGREEN JUNCUS PATENS `CARMAN`S GREY` SPREADING RUSH 5 GAL L N Y SUN OR SHADE, 2'H X 2'W, EVERGREEN LEYMUS CONDENSATUS `CANYON PRINCE` NATIVE BLUE RYE 1 GAL L N Y FULL SUN, 3'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN MIMULUS AURANTIACUS STICKY MONKEYFLOWER 5 GAL VL N Y FULL SUN TO PT SHADE, 4'H X 3'W, EVERGREEN EXISTING TREE TO BE PRESERVED SHADE TREES ACCENT TREES JAPANESE FLOWERING CHERRY LA NDSC APE PLA N SHEET INDEX L-1 COV ER SHEET L-2 PLANT PALETTE L-3 OV ERALL ILLUSTRATIV E SITE PLAN L-4 COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT - RLU APARTMENTS L-5 COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT - HEALTH CENTER L-6 RESTORATION CONCEPT PLAN L-7 CROSS SECTIONS L-8 AMENITY/CHARACTER IMAGERY L-9 SITE LIGHTING DIAGRAM NOTE: SEE SHEET L-5 FOR RIPARIAN TREES. PLA NTING LIST TREES SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVER STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA TOTAL GROUND/PODIUM LEV EL TREES IN 15-GALLON PROPOSED 76 TOTAL GROUND/PODIUM LEV EL TREES IN 24”-BOX PROPOSED 915 TOTAL GROUND/PODIUM SPECIMEN TREES IN 36”/60”/72”/120” BOX PROPOSED 44 TOTAL RIPARIAN MITIGATION TREES IN 15-GALLON 45 TOTAL TREES PRO POSED 1,080 SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER SIZ E QTY. QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIV E OAK 15-GAL 15 TREEPOT 4 8 QUERCUS LOBATA V ALLEY OAK 15-GAL 30 TREEPOT 4 23 CUTTINGS: COMBINATION OF SALIX LASIOLEPIS, SALIX LAEVIGATA WILLOW CUTTINGS 77 RIPARIAN MITIGATION TREE LEGEND: JU LY, 2020 L-2PLANT PALETTE PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` SHRUBBY YEW PODOCARPUS TREES STORMWATER TREATMENT AREASHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVER ULMUS CARPINIFOLIA X PARVIFOLIA ROSA FLORIBUNDA `BRILLIANT PINK ICEBERG` PRUNUS SERRULATA `AMANOGAWA` ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG GOLD` QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA ACACIA REDOLENS `DESERT CARPET` ABUTILON PALMERI EPILOBIUM CANUM ‘CATALINA’FESTUCA MAIREI RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `EVE CASE` RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `LEATHERLEAF` RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA ‘MOUND SAN BRUNO’ RIBES VIBURNIFOLIUM ROSA CALIFORNICA SALVIA MICROPHYLLA `HOT LIPS` SENECIO SERPENS TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS TEUCRIUM FRUTICANS ‘AZUREUM’KNIPHOFIA UVARIA ‘MALIBU YELLOW’ SALVIA LEUCANTHA `SANTA BARBARA` ROSA X `FLOWER CARPET APPLEBLOSSOM` HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA HEUCHERA X `ELECTRIC LIME` LAVATERA MARITIMA LIGUSTRUM SINENSE `SUNSHINE` LIRIOPE MUSCARI `VARIEGATA`LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA `BREEZE`MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS NANDINA DOMESTICA `LEMON LIME` MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS ‘PINK CLOUD’ HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA `BRAKELIGHT` ARBUTUS UNEDO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS CAMELLIA SASANQUA CISTUS X PURPUREUS DIETES BICOLOR EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICUM `BOWMAN`S #1` DIETES GRANDIFLORA `VARIEGATA`COLEONEMA PULCHRUM `SUNSET GOLD` CEANOTHUS X `RAY HARTMAN` ARCTOSTAPHYLOS MANZANITA `DR. HURD` QUERCUS LOBATA ACHILLEA ‘FIREFLY PEACH SKY’AGAVE ATTENUATA `KARA`S STRIPES` BOUTELOUA GRACILIS CAREX TUMULICOLA MIMULUS AURANTIACUS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS `CANYON PRINCE` JUNCUS PATENS ‘CARMEN’S GREY’ CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM `EL CAMPO` QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ULMUS PARVIFOLIA ‘DRAKE’ ARBUTUS X `MARINA` CITRUS SPP. CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS LAGERSTROEMIA `PURPLE TOWER` LAURUS NOBILIS `SARATOGA` OLEA EUROPAEA `SWAN HILL` LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `MUSKOGEE`LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `TONTO` `FRONTIER` FRONTIER ELM JAPANESE FLOWERING CHERRY ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE COAST LIVE OAK BANK CATCLAWINDIAN MALLOW CATALINA CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA ATLAS FESCUE CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY EVERGREEN CURRANT CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE HOT LIPS SAGE CURIO REPENS GERMANDER TREE GERMANDER MALIBU YELLOW POKER PLANTMEXICAN BUSH SAGE ROSE RED YUCCA TOYON CORAL BELLS TREE MALLLOW SUNSHINE LIGUSTRUM VARIEGATED LILY TURF BREEZE MAT RUSH DEER GRASS LEMON LIME NANDINAPINK CLOUD MUHLY GRASS BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA STRAWBERRY TREE SHRUB WESTERN REDBUD MULTI-TRUNK CHRISTMAS CAMELLIA ORCHID ROCKROSE FORTNIGHT LILY CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA STRIPED FORTNIGHT LILY GOLDEN BREATH OF HEAVEN MULTI-TRUNK CALIFORNIA LILAC DR. HURD MANZANITA VALLEY OAK FIREFLY PEACH SKY YARROW AGAVE BOUTELOUA GRACILIS BERKELEY SEDGE STICKY MONKEY FLOWER NATIVE BLUE RYE CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH CAPE RUSH SOUTHERN LIVE OAK ROSE DRAKE CHINESE ELM MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE ORANGE TREE MEDITERRANEAN CYPRESS PURPLE TOWER CRAPE MYRTLE SARATOGA BAY LAUREL SWAN HILL OLIVE MUSKOGEE CRAPE MYRTLE TONTO CRAPE MYRTLE NEPETA FAASSENII CATMINT PRUNUS X YEDOEN YOSHINO CHERRY ACER PALMATUM `MORTON` MORTON JAPANESE MAPLE AESCULUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA BUCKEYE CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE SALIX LASIOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW JU LY, 2020 L-3OVERALL ILLUSTRATIV E SITE PLAN20 80 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Arri val Pl aza En try Water Fea ture Cl ub Ho use La ke Co urt yard Au di tori um Mu ltipurp ose Ro om Po ol Bu ildi ng Po ol Pa tio Bo cce Co urt yard Po di um Co urt yard RLU Ri pari an Rest ora tion Zone Ove rl ook Do g Ru n Co mmunity Ga rden Ten nis Co urt Knoll Am en ity Fa cility Ma inten ance Bu ildi ng Villas Hea lth Cen ter Exi sting Sp ei men Oa k To Rem ain Ma sonry Wall Orn amen tal Met al Fen ce Pro pert y Li ne Ga ted EV A Rel ocated Ma n-Ma de Di tch MSE Ret aining Wall Sev e n H i l l s R a n c h R o a d Wa l n u t C r e e k Club View TerracedKinross Dr ive Adirondack WayAllegheny DriveMatterhorn DriveHEATHER FARMS CONDO NEIGHBORHOOD THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL 25 26 3 4 9 5 6 78 10 19 12 21 14 13 2 1 11 14 18 2120 24 25 16 17 27 13 22 23 15 27 22 23 24 Ma sonry Wall Orn amen tal Met al Fen ce Pro pert y Li ne Ornamental Metal Fence/ 42" Guardrail24Property Li ne 24 Pro pert y Li ne JU LY, 2020 L-4RLU COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT15 30 60 KEY PLAN N.T.S. 22 1 23 2 24 3 25 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Podium Patio w/ fireplace and specimen tre Fo rm al Ga rden Sp ace Sea ting No de Pu tting Green Arri val Pl aza Water Fea ture Fl ag Po les Water Fa ll La ke Koi Po nd Ga zebo Bri dge B.B.Q . Pa tio Sh ade El em en t Fo cal El em en t Ou tdo or Di ning Pa tio Po ol Pa tio SPA Pa ssive Ga rden Yoga La wn Ou tdo or Lo unge Bo cce Co urt s Au di tori um Pa tio/ Eve nt Sp ace Cl ubhouse Ou tdo or Di ning Pa tio Ove rl ook POOL BUILDING CLUB HOUSEAUDITORIUM MULTI- PURPOSE ROOM 10 10 19 22 25 24 11 11 10 23 23 11 15 12 9 6 20 1 2 3 2 10 21 4 8 10 14 11 10 11 5 71317 16 818 JU LY, 2020 L-5HEALTH CENTER COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT15 30 60 KEY PLAN N.T.S. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Arri val Pl aza Ski lled Nu rsi ng Co urt yard Assi sted Li ving Co urt yard Mem ory Ca re Co urt yard Fo cal El em en t Sh ade El em en t Exi sting Sp eci men V alley Oa k EV A w ith Turf Cel l Exi sting t rees to b e p rese rve d Det en tion Ba sin Pro pert y Li ne 2 6 4 85 1 9 6 3 6 7 5 10 11 5 JU LY, 2020 L-6RESTORATION CONCEPT PLAN 15 30 60 KEY PLAN N.T.S. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Exi sting Wet land (Note: No fill or alteration shall takeplace within the Exi sting Wet lands). Exi sting V alley Oa k to rem ain Ove rl ook No de Tra il Do g Ru n Wi llow cu ttings (Sa lix speci es) Quercu s lobata/V alley Oa k Quercu s agri go lia/Co ast Li ve Oa k Exi sting Pi pe Cu lvert 36 1 1 7 10 9 8 5 4 2 SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER SIZ E QTY. Quercus agrifolia Co ast Li ve Oa k 15-ga l 15 treep ot 4 8 Quercus lobata Valley Oa k 15-ga l 30 treep ot 4 23 Cu ttings : Co mbination o f Salix lasiolepis, Salix laevigata Wi llow cuttings 77 RIP ARIA N MITIGA TIO N TREE LEGEND: JU LY, 2020 L-710 20 40 CROSS SECTIONS KEY PLAN N.T.S. A B C PL PL HEATHER FARMS CONDO NEIGHBORHOOD HEATHER FARMS CONDO NEIGHBORHOOD HEATHER FARMS CONDO NEIGHBORHOOD RLU BUILDING VILLA UNIT (E) EAST+116 +144 EAST EAST EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN RETAINING WALLEXISTING GRADE 10’H RETAINING WALL EXISTING GRADE 5’ SIDEWALK 26’ PRIVATE STREET 26’ PRIVATE STREET 80’ TURNAROUND TENNIS COURT 6’ TRAIL WEST WEST SECTION A SECTION B SECTION C 1” = 20’ -0” 1” = 20’ -0” 1” = 20’ -0” WEST PLPL (E) 5’ SIDEWALK 5’H FENCE 30’ PRIVATE STREET AMENITY AT TOP OF KNOLL ASSISTED LIVING COURTYARD HEALTH CENTER (E) 5’ SIDEWALK EXISTING GRADE 26’ PRIVATE STREET JU LY, 2020 L-8XX XX XX AMENITY/CHARACTER IMAGERY ENTRY / ARRIVAL ZONE VEGETABLE GARDEN PASSIVE COURTYARD ACTIVE COURTYARD PODIUM OUTDOOR DINING/EVENT SPACE OVERLOOK SHADE MSE RETAINING WALL WATER FEATURE JU LY, 2020 L-920 80 160 SITE LIGHTING DIAGRAM Sev e n H i l l s R a n c h R o a d Wa l n u t C r e e k Club View TerracedKinross Dr ive Adirondack WayAllegheny DriveMatterhorn DriveHEATHER FARMS CONDO NEIGHBORHOOD THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL SYMBOL FIXTURE TYPE POST TOP LIGHT M FR: BEGA MODEL: 77 911, 38 W LED POLE HEIGHT: 14’ COLOR FINISH: T.B.D. BOLLARD LIGHT OPTION (1) MFR: BEGA MODEL: 99 058, 11.6 W LED HEIGHT: 39-3/8” COLOR FINISH: T.B.D. OPTION (2) MFR: BEGA MODEL: 84 025, 8.2 W LED (180 degree) HEIGHT: 35-3/4” COLOR FINISH: T.B.D. SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND: POST TOP LIGHT, TYP. BOLLARD LIGHT, TYP. Attachment K Supplemental Photosimulations Attachment L Revised Villa Configuration & Sections Exhibit NOVEMBER, 2022L-3REVISED CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT WITH ENHANCED SCHOOL BOUNDARY BUFFER40 80 160BB123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233Arrival PlazaEntry Water FeatureClub HouseLake CourtyardAuditoriumMultipurpose RoomPool BuildingPool PatioBocce CourtyardPodium CourtyardRLURiparian Restoration ZoneOverlookDog RunCommunity GardenTennis CourtKnoll AmenityFacility Maintenance BuildingVillas Health CenterExisting Speimen Oak To RemainMasonry WallOrnamental Metal Fence/42” GuardrailProperty LineGated EVARelocated Man-Made DitchMSE Retaining WallPorous Paving At ParkingPedestrian CrossingBike ParkingEntry Monument SignFacility/Directory SignEntry Secured GatesSeven Hills Ranch RoadWalnut CreekClub View TerracedKinross Dr i v e Adirondack Way Allegheny Drive Matterhorn Drive HEATHER FARMSCONDO NEIGHBORHOODTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL(FS)(FS)(DS)25263302829495678323232(DS)(DS)1032191221141323233313311114182120243225162929172713222315272930(DS)(DS)32(DS)(FS)FEDG NOVEMBER, 2022L-7816 32CROSS SECTIONSBKEY PLANN.T.S.EXISTING TREE TO REMAINEXISTING TREE TO REMAINEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN192’ LANDSCAPE BUFFERVILLA UNIT 51RETAINING WALLTW: 156BW: 153MASONRY WALLRETAINING WALLTW: 163BW: 161RETAINING WALLTW: 158.6BW: 158PLPLPLSECTION FSECTION GSECTION ESECTION D1/16” = 1’ -0”WESTEAST87’HEALTH CENTERPL5’ SIDEWALK26’PRIVATESTREETLANDSCAPE BUFFER1/16” = 1’ -0”1/16” = 1’ -0”1/16” = 1’ -0”SOUTHSOUTHSOUTHNORTHNORTH26’NORTH33’SCHOOL BLDG5’ SIDEWALK5’ SIDEWALKSCHOOL BLDGSCHOOL BLDGMASONRY WALLGUARDRAILMASONRY WALLEFDGVILLA UNIT 50VILLA UNIT 49VILLA UNIT 38GUARD RAIL NOVEMBER, 2022L-1315 30 60VILLA STUDY27132215302713221530Original PlanProposed Enhanced School Buffer Attachment M Public Comments Attachment N City of Walnut Creek Letters Attachment O Community Benefits Agreement 1 COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENT between CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and DIABLO GLEN WALNUT CREEK CCRC LLC (County File Nos. CDGP20-00001, CDRZ20-03225, CDMS20-00007, CDLP20-02038, CDDP20-03018) This Community Benefits Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of _____________, 2022 (“Effective Date”) by and between Contra Costa County (“County”), a political subdivision of the State of California, and Diablo Glen Walnut Creek CCRC LLC (“Developer”), a Delaware limited liability company. RECITALS A. On_________, 2022, the County Board of Supervisors certified the environmental impact report (the “EIR”) and approved Developer’s Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project (the “Project”), a State-licensed continuing care retirement community composed of 354 independent living units, a health care center, and other amenities, located in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area, including a General Plan amendment (CDGP20-00001), a rezoning (CDRZ20-03225), a minor subdivision (CDMS20-00007), a land use permit (CDLP20- 02038), and a preliminary and final development plan (CDDP20-03018). B. In addition to the discretionary land use approvals already obtained from the County, Developer intends to obtain County building permits necessary to construct the Project. C. Due to its location, surrounding uses, and State-licensed medical care components, the Project is a unique institutional development that would be constructed in an established community. The Developer’s commitments provided for in this Agreement will enhance the public benefits provided to the community, in addition to those benefits derived directly from the Project. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, Contra Costa County and Developer agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize Developer’s commitment to making an annual community benefits contribution to the County during the term of this Agreement. 2. Term. The term (“Term”) of this Agreement begins on the Effective Date, and it expires upon the earliest of any of the following to occur: (a) the payment of the final community benefit payment provided for in Section 3; or (b) the effective date of any court decision that invalidates or sets aside the Project or the EIR. 2 3. Community Benefits Payments. a. Developer shall pay $500,000 to the County, less any Credit, (the “First Payment”) upon Final Approval of the Project. “Final Approval” means that the final map for the Project has been approved by the County Board of Supervisors, all required permits and entitlements from the City of Walnut Creek have issued, the respective statues of limitations for challenging the Project have run, and any pending legal challenges or appeals related to the Project have been finally resolved. The First Payment shall be made to the County on or before the December 31st immediately following the earlier of (i) the Final Approval described above, and (ii) the issuance of the first building permit for the Project. b. After payment of the First Payment, Developer shall pay $277,778 to the County in each of the nine following years (each a “Subsequent Payment”). Each of these nine Subsequent Payments shall be made to the County on or before December 31 in the year in which a Subsequent Payment is due. 4. Use of Payments. The County shall, in its sole discretion, allocate funds received pursuant to this Agreement to benefit the local community, including areas within the unincorporated Contra Costa County and the City of Walnut Creek near the Project. Funds may be used to, for example and without limitation: establish or maintain parks or trails; maintain or beautify roadways, rights-of-way, or open space; or establish, maintain, or beautify other community improvements. The County may coordinate with the City of Walnut Creek in the allocation and expenditure of funds received pursuant to this Agreement. 5. In-kind Community Improvement Credit. a. The parties acknowledge that Developer may fund and directly provide additional in-kind community improvements not required of Developer as part of the Project approvals. Subject to approval by the Conservation and Development Director (the “Director”), which shall be in their sole discretion to give, Developer shall be credited the actual costs incurred by Developer, up to $500,000, in directly providing any additional in-kind community improvement that is consistent with the uses described in Section 4 (the total of all approved actual costs, the “Credit”). Only actual costs incurred by Developer prior to payment of the First Payment are eligible for credit. b. Prior to payment of the First Payment, Developer shall provide the County with documentation of the actual costs incurred by Developer, including but not limited to, an accounting of contracts executed, purchases made, and Developer’s staff time spent to directly provide any additional in-kind community improvements. At the Director’s request, Developer shall provide additional documentation or information. 6. Notices. All payments, notices, demands, and other communications made under this Agreement shall be in writing and personally delivered, sent by overnight carrier with 3 delivery charges prepaid for next business day delivery, or sent by First Class U.S. Mail with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: To County: Director of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 To Developer: Spieker Senior Development c/o Tobias Mellows 3000 Sand Hill Road #3-190 Menlo Park, CA 94025 A payment, notice, demand, or other communication shall be deemed given on the same day it is personally delivered, on the next business day following deposit with and overnight carrier, or on the fifth day after deposit in the U.S. Mail. A party may change its address for delivery of notices under this Agreement by providing written notice of the change in accordance with this section. 7. Assignment. Developer’s obligations under this Agreement shall be binding upon Developer’s successors and assigns. Developer shall not assign this Agreement, or any of its obligations under this Agreement, to any other person or entity without the advance written approval of the County, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Developer sells, conveys, or otherwise transfers ownership of the Project to a third-party, Developer shall require that third-party to accept an assignment of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the above, County consent to assignment or other transfer under this Section shall not be required for an assignment or transfer resulting from corporate reorganization, restructuring, merger, or name change involving Developer and affiliated entities, so long as there is no substantial change in the management or control of Developer, and Developer provides County with prior notice of the assignment. 8. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement confers and rights or obligations on any person or entity that is not a party to this Agreement. 9. Counterparts. The Agreement may be executed in counterparts. 10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. [Signatures on following page] 4 The County and Developer have executed this agreement as specified below. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DIABLO GLEN WALNUT CREEK CCRC LLC _________________________________ By: _______________________________ Name: ___________________________ Name: _____________________________ Title: ____________________________ Title: ______________________________ Date Signed: ______________________ Date Signed: ________________________ Attachment P Proposed Land Dedication Exhibit LinLoungeMulti-PurposeRoomLobbyLobbyLobbyGrand StairEntryBilliardsPatioMarketingLibraryCard RoomConf.RoomOfficeOfficeOfficeOfficeOffice OfficeGeneratorWork ShopWork RoomTrash CompactorElectricalPlumbing Dirty LaundryClean LaundryVESTIBULEOFFER OF DEDICATION AREALENGTH:1,860± LINEAR FEETAREA:2.4± ACRESWIDTH:VARIES 20'-100'±SEVEN HILLS RANCH ROADKINROSS DRIVEHOMESTEADAVENUEWALNUT CREEKCHANNELWALNUTBOULEVARD N SAN CARLOS DRIVESPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE COMMUNITYCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA # 2019-1168TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPNOVEMBER 22ND, 20221646 N. CALIFORNIA BLVDSUITE 400WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596(925) 940-2200www.bkf.comC8.0OFFER OFDEDICATIONEXHIBIT A TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Attachment Q Presentation Slides SPIEKER SENIOR CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY PROJECTCOUNTY FILES: #CDGP20-0001, #CDRZ20-3255, #CDMS20-0007, #CDDP20-3018, #CDLP20-02038County Board of SupervisorsNovember 29, 20221 PROJECT SITE & VICINITY2 PRIMARY PROJECT ELEMENTSGeneral Plan Amendment: An amendment to the Land Use Element of the County General plan to amend the land use map to designate the project site as a Congregate Care/Senior Housing (CC) designation; Rezoning: A rezoning of the project site to a project-specific Planned Unit (P-1) district; Tentative Map: A Tentative Parcel Map to reconfigure the two existing parcels that comprise the site from approximately 13 and 17 acres in area to 25 and 5 acres in area with refined legal descriptions; Land Use Permit: A Land Use Permit to allow the sale of alcohol within the proposed clubhouse;Development Plan: A Preliminary and Final Development Plan to allow the construction of a CCRC consisting of the following primary components: 354 independent living units for residents not needing daily assistance; health care center for 100 residents and non-residents requiring daily assistance or medical attention; maintenance building; associated drainage, access, and utility improvements, amenities including a swimming pool, tennis courts, gym, auditorium, restaurants, bar, theatre, library, and clubhouse and approximately 225,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 150,000 cubic yards of fill grading activities resulting in a net export of 75,000 cubic yards of soil from the site.Tree Permit: A Tree Permit to allow the removal of up to 353 trees.3 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CHANGE4 PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE5 6 Notice of Preparation (NOP) distributed on July 23, 2021.The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was released for public review on March 11, 2022, and was available for public review through May 10, 2022.The Final EIR, including Responses to Comments and attached appendices was published and distributed on October 11, 2022.The EIR identifies potentially significant environmental impacts that would occur if the project is implemented, and recommends feasible mitigation measures that would, in each case, reduce those impacts to less than significant levels.Potentially significant impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant levels were identified in the EIR in the following areas: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology and Soils; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Noise; and Tribal resources.7ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGOn October 26, 2022, after a public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors not certify the EIR and not approve the project. The Commission cited insufficient public benefit to support approving the requested General Plan amendmentThe Commission also recommended additional analysis of Project traffic impacts, necessary roadway improvements, emergency vehicle access, and impacts to emergency evacuation routes for Seven Hills School.Lastly, in response to the volume of public comments on the matter, the Commission also recommended that the applicant continue to meet with the adjacent Seven Hills School with respect to Project buffering and light access.8 Staff report contains detailed responses to the issues raised by the Planning Commission as well as to recent letters from the City of Walnut Creek, including the following:Public interest: The proposed Project would create 354 independent living units for seniors, plus a 100-unit health care center to provide necessary care to resident seniors and the community. The existing medium density single-family land use designation would allow for the development of up to 166 single-family residences. The proposed Project and General Plan amendments represent a 216% increase in living units on the project site, and would provide needed housing and services to an underserved, and growing, portion of the County’s population. Additional visual simulations and sectional drawings have been submitted by the applicant and included in the staff materials.Concerns about traffic and parking analysis, comparison with alternatives, intersection impacts, emergency vehicle access, drainage, pedestrian and bicycle connections, park impacts, and other matters have been responded to issue by issue and , in some cases, new or modified conditions have been recommended (including new or modified conditions related to drainage, construction impacts and additional project benefits proposed by the applicant).The applicant has proposed relocating and reconfiguring one villa and reducing the size of retaining walls to better buffer the Seven Hills School.9STAFF RESPONSE 10PROPOSED RELOCATION OF VILLA TO ENHANCE BUFFER The applicant has agreed to provide the following additional Project benefits:Financial Assistance Program (COA No. 35). Establish a $2,000,000 annuity for the purpose of providing ongoing subsidies to lower-income households that would not otherwise have the financial means to live in the facility. Program target occupancy rate of 10% of the independent living units. Program would prioritize Very-Low- and Lower-Income Households.Offer of Dedication (COA No. 71). Convey to the County an irrevocable offer of dedication in fee of approximately 2.4 acres for public purposes, including flood control, drainage, restoration, open space, and/or public trails, in the County’s sole discretion.Community Benefits Agreement (COA No. 43). Make community benefit payments totaling $3,000,000 over ten years for, at the County’s sole discretion, establishing or maintaining parks or trails; maintaining or beautifying roadways, rights-of-way, or open space; or establishing, maintaining, or beautifying other community improvements. Will benefit the unincorporated County and the City of Walnut Creek near the Project. 11ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS 12OFFER OF DEDICATION Staff recommends approving the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Retirement Community Project, certifying the EIR and taking the related actions detailed in the staff report.13STAFF RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS14 ATTN: Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County From: Patricia McGowan, concerned citizen Subject: Proposed Spieker Senior Care Project Do not allow this intense change Deny the General Plan Amendment Date: November 29, 2022 Public Hearing at the Board of Supervisors _______________________________________________________________________________________ My name is Patricia McGowan and I would like to share the following information from Save Seven Hills Ranch: Seven Hills Ranch is designated for residential housing in the County General Plan. The Spieker Project Description states that the proposed project “does not contain any residential component.” It states that there will be “354 independent living units for residents” and that 500-700 people will reside at the project. But despite this, the developer insists and the County now views CCRC living units as “an amenity of the institutional use” and NOT residences or housing. This gives the applicant free reign to ignore County requirements for residential development. Specifically, the applicant can disregard the county Park Dedication Standards[1] and the Inclusionary Housing ordinance[2] both of which are required of all Contra Costa County residential housing developments. The applicant asks you to believe this is not residential and they cite the legal reasons for doing so. However, you do not have to accept a proposal from a developer unwilling to incorporate these valid and beneficial County residential requirements, regardless of whether they are legally required to do so or not.
 
 Join your public in recognizing that any development of 30 undeveloped acres should include a reasonable amount of incorporated publicly accessible green space and that a development of 350 living units should include some affordable units. An applicant that is so adamantly opposed to including those “good neighbor” features in their design should not be rewarded with a tailor-made General Plan Amendment which is all rewards for them and none for your community. We request that the County deny the General Plan amendment and remain consistent with your current General Plan or the Envision Contra Costa 2040 Plan and keep the residential land use designation for this site, Additionally and speaking for myself I would like to add that: I am asking that this site be used to provide housing and remember, the developer has stated that the proposed community care facility is NOT housing. As you know, a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) was adopted at the State level to mitigate the imbalance between housing creation and job creation throughout the state. The determination by ABAG, the Association of Bay Area Governments, for unincorporated Contra 1 Costa County is that from 2023 to 2031 over 7,600 housing units in the unincorporated areas of the County plus an additional 5,800 housing units in Walnut Creek need to be built. The County is updating the General Plan with Envision Contra Costa 2040 to show locations and policies to facilitate this housing being built. In the current General Plan and in the draft new Envision Contra Costa 2040 Plan, this site is designated low-medium density residential with the density of 3 to 7 housing units per net acre. As stated in the applicant’s Project Description, “the Project does not contain any residential component”. So how would approving this Project, which would violate the current and future General Plan, advance the County’s required compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation to have over 7,600 housing units? Housing Element of the County’s General Plan was adopted to mitigate the imbalance between housing and jobs in the County. Housing Element Goal 6 is to “Provide adequate sites through land use designation and zoning to accommodate the County’s share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation.” What is the public good of approving non-housing on a site that can be used to achieve the County’s required housing allocation? 
 
 Or will the developer get it both ways… and convince you, the Board of Supervisors, that their project is housing as far as ABAG is concerned, but is not housing as far as the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is concerned? What is the public good of letting the developer's attorneys find a way to state that these 1-3 bedroom apartments and villas are not housing, thereby depriving the County of inclusionary housing but are housing when it comes to ABAG compliance? Additionally, I believe that a residential development consistent with the General Plan would be less disruption to the natural site, require less earthwork and result in more mature trees being saved. We believe that housing can be built on this site in a way that doesn’t take a hilly site and make it flat, that doesn’t require +350 trees to be removed and that doesn’t require an extremely extensive amount of earth work. 
 
 Per the Project Description, the Project would flatten the hill tops, and require over 22,000 dump truck loads of soil being moved around on site of which +7,500 dump truck loads would get hauled off site. That is a huge amount of earthwork, projected to take at least 12 months out of a four-year construction period. Just the soil being moved off site will require 60 dump trucks a day for one year 30 trucks going in and 30 trucks driving out; out past houses, a public golf course, the busy public park of Heather Farms, and then onto Ygnasio Valley Road. And that’s just the earthwork being hauled off the site, not yet counting the concrete trucks, steel, wood, sheet rock, kitchens, bathrooms, and other construction deliveries. 
 
 What is the public good for allowing over building of this site? 
 
 We believe a residential density consistent with the current and draft General Plan would not require this amount of cut and fill, would not require +350 trees to be destroyed many of which are mature full size Oak trees, and would not require the natural hilly site to be completely reshaped. 
 Policy 3-28 of the current General Plan states that “New residential development shall be accommodated only in areas where it will avoid creating severe unmitigated adverse impacts 2 upon the environment and upon the existing community.” The proposed project is not consistent at all with the surrounding community. The surroundings include low-medium density residential uses, a school, and a large city park. All of these would be drastically impacted by the immense scale of the proposed project, especially in terms of the visual impacts, air pollution and noise associated with major grading and leveling of the hillsides, incredibly high retaining walls, removal of major trees, and the immense scale of the proposed apartment building. No creative thinking has gone into suggesting mitigation measures that would improve the compatibility with the neighborhood such as: •Reduced scale of the largest building in terms of footprint and height •Preserving a large portion of the site in open space that could be shared with the neighborhood Preserving on-site critical trees •Reduced grading to respect the natural form of the site by siting buildings in a way that minimizes grading requirements This site should not be developed as intensely as proposed and a site plan that reduces impacts and integrates into the existing community would show far less development than what is proposed while complying with your adopted and draft General Plan. Thank you. 
 3 1 June McHuen From:Dennis Fischer Sent:Tuesday, November 22, 2022 7:54 PM To:Clerk of the Board Subject:Public Comment for Nov 29 BOS meeting, Spieker Project Dear Contra Costa Board of Supervisors,    As a resident of Walnut Creek, I am contacting you with my concerns about the Spieker Proposal for Seven Hills Ranch. I ask  the Board to deny the General Plan Amendment (GPA) requested in the Spieker Proposal.     I am very concerned about destruction of habitat protection as this project calls for the removal of over 400 trees (350 of  which are in County protective status).  Additionally, within the proposed development area, the significant hills will be  leveled and replaced with three to four  story buildings and pavement. During the recent Planning Commission meeting, the  developer attempted to downplay this by stating they would replace some of the trees.  However this will do little to ease the  disruption to existing habitat, wildlife and the public as these new trees will take significant time to develop and integrate into  the environment. California is struggling with the effects of climate change and drought.  We should be protecting our  remaining green space.    I also feel that any development on Seven Hills Ranch should include some component of public access, in particular a trail to  the ridge which would connect to nearby trails and Heather Farm Park.  The City of Walnut Creek’s planning documents have  proposed such a trail for years.  The developer’s proposal does not allow for any public access, but instead is a walled‐off  compound with retaining walls up to to 25 feet high.  This is not in keeping with the existing nearby residences and Heather  Farm Park.     It is also of concern that this project does not provide housing to the general public.  It is a business that will provide housing  and services to a privileged group of senior citizens.  This is not a residential neighborhood that I will be allowed to pass  through when going on a walk.  It will be a walled‐off private business.  Again, this is not in keeping with the surrounding  community and this walled off facility will not be a part of the neighborhood.      The Contra Costa County Planning Commission denied approval of the GPA, and I ask that the Contra Costa County Board of  Supervisors also deny the GPA, in recognition that this request is for a radical change to the General Plan.      I thank you for considering my comments.     Sincerely,    Dennis Fischer    1 From:Susan Fischer Sent:Tuesday, November 22, 2022 8:56 PM To:Clerk of the Board Subject:Public Comment for Nov 29 BOS meeting, Spieker Project Dear Board of Supervisors,    As a resident of Walnut Creek, I am contacting you with my concerns about the Spieker Proposal for Seven Hills Ranch. I  ask the Board to deny the General Plan Amendment (GPA) requested in the Spieker Proposal.     I am very much concerned about habitat protection as this project calls for the removal of over 400 trees (350 of which  are in County protective status).  The hills will be leveled and replaced with three to four  story buildings and pavement.  During the recent meeting with the Planning Commission, the developer attempted to downplay this by stating they  would replace some of the trees.  It would be in the interest of the existing habitat, wildlife and the public to have a  smaller scale project, as per the current zoning, which would allow for more preservation of the trees, habitat and  wildlife. California is struggling with the effects of climate change and drought.  We should be protecting our remaining  green space.    I also feel that any development on Seven Hills Ranch should include some component of public access, in particular a  trail to the ridge which would connect to nearby trails and Heather Farm Park.  The City of Walnut Creek’s planning  documents have proposed such a trail for years.  The developer’s proposal does not allow for any public access, but  instead is a walled‐off compound with retaining walls up to to 25 feet high.  This is not in keeping with the existing  nearby residences and Heather Farm Park.     It is also of concern that this project does not provide housing for the general public.  It is a business that will provide  housing and services to a privileged group of senior citizens.  This is not a residential neighborhood that I will be allowed  to pass through when going for a walk.  It will be a walled off private business.  Again, this is not in keeping with the  surrounding community and this walled off facility will not be a part of the neighborhood.      The Contra Costa County Planning Commission denied approval of the GPA, and I ask that the Contra Costa County  Board of Supervisors also deny the GPA, in recognition that this request is for a radical change to the General Plan.  I  thank you for considering my comments.     Sincerely,    Susan Fischer  Walnut Creek    1 From:Kayoko Korsgaard Sent:Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:42 PM To:Clerk of the Board Subject:Public Comment for Nov 29 BOS meeting, Spieker Project Attention Board of Supervisors, I am writing to strongly urge you to deny the General Plan Amendment. The fact is the proposed development would bring an overwhelming and negative change to our Community and the land they intend to build on. In particular, the proposal would require a radical change in the County's allowed density. The developer repeatedly refers to this project as an “infill” project. We contend that this is NOT an “infill” project and its intense development in the proposed manner is in fact contrary to the stated “infill” goals of the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). In particular, the OPR’s stated commitment is to “reduce conversion of …sensitive habitat and open space for new development” when considering infill developments. A development proposal is not automatically considered “infill” simply because it is inside the Urban Limit Line (ULL). This 30-acre natural environment as a target for extreme destruction under the banner of “infill” is in fact in direct opposition to many of the OPR’s stated goals and definitions of “infill”. The Spieker EIR continually states this development is proposed for this “urban infill” site . This seriously stretches the concept of urban infill. Generally, “urban” means high rises and densely populated commerce hubs, and “infill” refers to empty or underused lots among urban city blocks. This site is neither, although the proposed development would transform the current suburban area into an urban environment due to its building heights and multiple commercial-type buildings, including a 85,000 square foot Health Care Facility for its residents and the public. Please reject this request so that we can find a more reasonable and acceptable alternative for the use of this property.   Thank you, Kayoko Korsgaard Walnut Creek Resident 1 From:hugh firstchoicesigns.net Sent:Wednesday, November 23, 2022 5:18 AM To:Clerk of the Board Subject:850 Seven Hills Ranch Rd. To: Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors     Re: 850 Seven Hills Ranch Rd.    The proposed development of the subject property is short sighted and should not be allowed.  It would utterly destroy  a beautiful and increasingly rare piece of land that the community has this one time opportunity to preserve for the  enjoyment of current residents and future generations of both the citizens and wildlife.    I urge you strongly to reject this proposal and designate the property as a natural area so that it serves everyone and not  just the interests of the developer and an already well served group of retirees.  With my sincere thanks on behalf of the entire community, Hugh Ashcraft  1 From:Mariza Rocha Sent:Wednesday, November 23, 2022 11:51 AM To:Clerk of the Board Cc:Troy Bourne Subject:Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project BOS Meeting 11-29-2022 Attachments:1. Hansen to Yost.pdf Dear Ms. Boyd, Clerk of the Board, I am the Sales Operations Coordinator for the new Diablo Glen community proposed in Walnut Creek. I understand you’ve collected incoming communication from the public regarding the Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project in preparation for the Board of Supervisors Meeting scheduled for 11-29-2022. Our supporters have been sending messages directly to the Supervisor’s email addresses. I’ve collected them here for your review and processing. I have separated the letters of support into several batches for your convenience. Please see the first batch attached. Please let me know if you have any questions. Wishing you a Happy Thanksgiving, Mariza Rocha Sales Operations Coordinator Diablo Glen (925) 979-5970 diabloglen.com   Where Residents & Employees Thrive     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission  and any documents accompanying this electronic mail transmission are intended by the sender for the use of the named  addressee(s) to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. It is not  intended for transmissions to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee(s) (or a person authorized to  deliver it to the named addressee(s)). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have  received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it,  and notify the sender of the error by reply e‐mail.   Page Date Received Doc Dated From Description 1 11/10/2022 Hansen, Thomas letter (support) 2 11/11/2022 Gray, Paul & Judy email (support) 3 11/11/2022 Trowbridge,Tom email (support) 4 11/11/2022 Campbell, Martha email (support) 5 11/11/2022 Breslau, Barbara & Ray email (support) 6 11/11/2022 Ball, Michael & Karen email (support) 7 11/11/2022 Hyatt, E. Kenneth & Christine email (support) 8 11/11/2022 Hu, Chenming email (support) 9 11/11/2022 Lamborn, Mike email (support) 10 11/11/2022 Snyder, David email (support) 11-12 11/12/2022 Casey, Michael 'LDQH email (support) 13 11/12/2022 Lundberg, Norman & Christy email (support) 14 11/12/2022 Minor, William email (support) 15 11/12/2022 Prickett, Norman & Sherry email (support) 16 11/12/2022 Yost, John & Stacy email (support) &ƌŽŵ͗Wh>'Zz ĂƚĞ͗EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮĂƚϴ͗ϰϴ͗ϭϳWDW^d dŽ͗ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ Đ͗:ŽŚŶ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͕ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐŽŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͕ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͕ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗tĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ DƐ<ĂƌĞŶDŝƚĐŚŽĨĨ ŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐ ĞĂƌDƐDŝƚĐŚŽĨĨ dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĨŽƌŐŝǀŝŶŐŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ͘DLJ ǁŝĨĞ:ƵĚLJĂŶĚ/ĂƌĞŽŶƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶůŝƐƚŽĨ ĨƵƚƵƌĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚĚŽŽĨĐŽƵƌƐĞŚŽƉĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐďƵŝůƚĨŽƌƚŚĂƚƌĞĂƐŽŶ͘ DŽƌĞŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚůLJ͕ǁĞƵƌŐĞĨĂǀŽƌĂďůĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐŝƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ ŵŽƌĞďƌŽĂĚůLJƚŽĐŝƚŝnjĞŶƐŽĨŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŬĞLJĨĂĐƚŽƌŝƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞǀĂƐƚŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞϯϬϬͲϯϱϬ ĐŽƵƉůĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŚŽǁŝůůŽĐĐƵƉLJƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚLJ͕ŵŽƐƚůLJŝŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͘dŚŝƐŵĞĂŶƐƚŚĂƚ͗ ϭ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƐĞĐƵƌĞĂŶĚǁĞůůƉůĂŶŶĞĚůŽŶŐƚĞƌŵƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůͬŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞŽƉƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĂůĂƌŐĞ ŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĞůĚĞƌůLJĐŽƵŶƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐǁŚŽ;ůŝŬĞƵƐͿĂƌĞŝŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚƐƚĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƌůŝĨĞĂŶĚĂƌĞŝŶĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůŶĞĞĚ ŽĨƐƵĐŚĂŶŽƉƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĞdžƚƌĂŽƌĚŝŶĂƌŝůLJůĂƌŐĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞǁŚŽŚĂǀĞƐŝŐŶĞĚŽŶƚŽƚŚĞǁĂŝƚŝŶŐůŝƐƚŝƐ ƐƚƌŽŶŐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ͘ Ϯ͘ ǀĞŶŵŽƌĞŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚůLJ͕ƚŚĞǀĂƐƚŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJŽĨƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐǁŚŽŵŽǀĞŝŶƚŽŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŶǁŝůůǀĂĐĂƚĞƐŝŶŐůĞ ĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚŝƐǁŝůůŵĂŬĞŽŶƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌŽĨϮϬϬͲϯϬϬƐŝŶŐůĞĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͕ĂůůŽǁŝŶŐLJŽƵŶŐĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐƚŽŵŽǀĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚŝƐŝƐĂƚƌĞŵĞŶĚŽƵƐůLJƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŶŽƚďƵŝůƚ͕ŵĂŶLJŽĨŵŽƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƐĞŶŝŽƌƐĂƌĞůŝŬĞůLJƚŽ ƐƚĂLJŝŶƚŚĞŝƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐůŽŶŐĞƌ͕ƌĞůLJŝŶŐŽŶĨĂŵŝůLJŽƌƉĂŝĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŝƌŶĞĞĚƐ͘ ƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ/Z͕ƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůĞŐŝƚŝŵĂƚĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐĂďŽƵƚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚďLJ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐ͕ŽƚŚĞƌĂƌĞĂƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĞŶƚŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚ͘KƵƌƌĞĂĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚďLJƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌĂŶĚĐŽƵŶƚLJƐƚĂĨĨŝƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐĞĞŝƚŚĞƌŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŽƌĐĂŶĞĂƐŝůLJďĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚ͘dŚĞĞdžƚƌĂŽƌĚŝŶĂƌLJďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƌŐŽŽĚŽĨ ƚŚĞĐŝƚŝnjĞŶƐŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJƐĞĞŵƚŽƵƐĨĂƌŵŽƌĞŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƚŽǁĞŝŐŚŝŶŵĂŬŝŶŐLJŽƵƌĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶ &ŽƌƚŚĞƐĞƌĞĂƐŽŶƐǁĞƵƌŐĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚďLJƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐ͘ dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĨŽƌƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽĐŽŵŵĞŶƚ͊ WĂƵůĂŶĚ:ƵĚLJ'ƌĂLJ >ĂĨĂLJĞƚƚĞ͕ &ƌŽŵ͗dŽŵdƌŽǁďƌŝĚŐĞ ^ĞŶƚ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮϰ͗ϮϱWD dŽ͗ΖƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖфƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Đ͗Ζ:ŽŚŶ'ŝŽŝĂ͗Ζф:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖ΖĂŶĚĂĐĞŶĚĞƌƐĞŶ͗Ζ фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖ΖŝĂŶĞƵƌŐŝƐ͗ΖфƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖Ζ&ĞĚĞƌĂů 'ůŽǀĞƌ͗ΖфĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗^ƚƌŽŶŐ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ ĞĂƌ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌDŝƚĐŚŽĨĨ͕ /ǁƌŝƚĞƚŽĞdžƉƌĞƐƐŵLJƐƚƌŽŶŐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐĐĂƌĞƌĞƚŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƌĞŝƐĂĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂďůĞƵŶĨŝůůĞĚŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƚLJƉĞŽĨĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŝŶŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƉůĂŶƐĂǀĞƌLJŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞĂŶĂƐƐĞƚƚŽƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͘ dŚĞĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞKĐƚŽďĞƌϮϲWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐǁĂƐƵŶĨŽƌƚƵŶĂƚĞŝŶƚŚĂƚ͕ŐŝǀĞŶ ƚŚĞůĂƚĞŶĞƐƐŽĨƚŚĞŚŽƵƌ͕ƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚĚŝĚŶŽƚŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽƌĞďƵƚƚŚĞŽďũĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ ƌĂŝƐĞĚďLJƚŚĞŽƉƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͘/ŶƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌǁĞƌĞƚŚĞŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐĨŽƌŵůĞƚƚĞƌĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐĂďŽƵƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ǁŚŝĐŚŚĂĚďĞĞŶĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚƚŚŽƌŽƵŐŚůLJďLJŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĞdžƉĞƌƚƐ͘ /ƵƌŐĞƚŚĞ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐƚŽŽǀĞƌƌƵůĞƚŚĞĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐĂƚŝƚƐŵĞĞƚŝŶŐŽŶ EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϵ͘ dŽŵdƌŽǁďƌŝĚŐĞ͕ ϰϲͲLJĞĂƌKƌŝŶĚĂƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚ &ƌŽŵ͗DĂƌƚLJĂŵƉďĞůů ĂƚĞ͗&ƌŝ͕EŽǀϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮĂƚϳ͗ϯϭWD ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ dŽ͗фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Đ͗ф:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕ фĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх /ĂŵĂϰϱLJĞĂƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŽĨtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬǁŝƚŚĚĞĞƉƌŽŽƚƐŚĞƌĞ͘ůƚŚŽƵŐŚŵLJŚƵƐďĂŶĚĂŶĚ/ůŝǀĞĚĂďƌŽĂĚ ƐĞǀĞƌĂůƚŝŵĞƐǁŚŝůĞŚĞǁĂƐĂůŝǀĞ͕ǁĞŬĞƉƚŽƵƌŚŽŵĞŝŶƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚŐĂƚĞĂƌĞĂŽĨtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬďĞĐĂƵƐĞǁĞ ŬŶŽǁĂŶĚůŽǀĞƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘KƵƌĐŚƵƌĐŚŚŽŵĞŝƐŚĞƌĞ͕ŵLJŚƵƐďĂŶĚƌĞƐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŽůƵŵďĂƌŝƵŵƚŚĞƌĞ͕ ĂŶĚ/ǁĂŶƚƚŽůŝǀĞŽƵƚŵLJƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐĚĂLJƐŝŶƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ As a comprehensive care community, Diablo Glen offers me the perfect solution as I wish to age in place. For now, I walk 4 miles a day and live an active, happy life with many friends across the county. My two sons and families live in Ohio andVirginia, attractive to visit but combined with the fact that they too may at some point move, I cannot imagine moving to be closer to them. In addition, living alone now I anticipate needing more care in my future and wish to free my sons from this obligation; instead, knowing I am within reach of excellent medical care and immediate assistance at a cost built into my residential costs at Diablo Glen. This peace of mind for me and for my children is extremely important to me. The lovely grounds and proximity to all the retail outlets and walking trails in Walnut Creek make Diablo Glen an important asset to our county. I can't wait for this to be approved and built! Warm regards, Martha Campbell Walnut Creek, CA 94598 From:Barbara Breslau Subject: Support for Diablo Glen Date:November 11, 2022 at 1:28:46 PM PST To:supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc:johngioia@bos.cccounty.us,supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us,district5@bos.cccounty.us ĞĂƌDƐ͘DŝƚĐŚŽĨĨ͕ tĞĂƌĞǁƌŝƚŝŶŐŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ͕ƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƌĞƚŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĨŽƌtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͘tĞĂƌĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJůŝǀŝŶŐŝŶKƌŝŶĚĂĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂŶĚŐƌĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶŝŶƚŚĞĂƐƚĂLJƌĞĂ͘ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŝƐ ĞdžĂĐƚůLJƚŚĞŬŝŶĚŽĨĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐĐĂƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽŵŽǀĞŝŶƚŽ͘tĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝƚŝƐŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƚŽ ŚĂǀĞĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ĂƐƐŝƐƚĞĚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ŶƵƌƐŝŶŐĐĂƌĞĂŶĚŵĞŵŽƌLJĐĂƌĞŝŶƚŚĞ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬĂƌĞĂ͘tĞĂŶĚŵĂŶLJŽĨŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐĂƌĞĂůƌĞĂĚLJŽŶƚŚĞǁĂŝƚŝŶŐůŝƐƚ͘ /ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞĂŐŽŽĚĨƌŝĞŶĚǁŚŽůŝǀĞƐŝŶ^ƚŽŶĞƌŝĚŐĞ͕ƐŽǁĞĂƌĞĨĂŵŝůŝĂƌǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŬŝŶĚŽĨĨŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĞ^ƉŝĞŬĞƌ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂƐďƵŝůƚ͘tĞŬŶŽǁŚŽǁŚĂƉƉLJŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚŝƐƚŚĞƌĞ͕ďƵƚ^ƚŽŶĞƌŝĚŐĞŝƐƚŽŽĨĂƌ ĂǁĂLJĨŽƌƵƐ͘ tĞƵƌŐĞLJŽƵƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚŚĞůƉĨĂƐƚƚƌĂĐŬŝƚƚŽĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕ ĂƌďĂƌĂĂŶĚZĂLJƌĞƐůĂƵ KƌŝŶĚĂϵϰϱϲϯ ͗:ŽŚŶ'ŝŽŝĂ͕ĂŶĚĂĐĞŶĚĞƌƐŽŶ͕ŝĂŶĞƵƌŐŝƐ͕&ĞĚĞƌĂů'ůŽǀĞƌ Dear Supervisors, My husband, Michael and I would like to express our strong support for the proposed Diablo Glen Retirement Community. As homeowners in the adjacent Heather Farms community we both feel that Diablo Glen is an excellent use for the property as it will provide a beautiful environment for the future residents of the homes in Diablo Glen and it will be a positive enhancement to the current surrounding residential neighborhoods. We have toured other communities by Spieker Development and are impressed with the design, construction quality, and life style offered by their communities. We truly believe Diablo Glen will offer all residents of Walnut Creek a beautiful location in which to spend their retirement years should they desire to do so. We strongly urge you to support Diablo Glen to provide a superior retirement community for our Walnut Creek residents. Sincerely, Michael and Karen Ball Walnut Creek CA 94598 &ƌŽŵ͗<ĞŶ,LJĂƚƚ ^ĞŶƚ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮϮ͗ϰϮWD dŽ͗ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ Đ͗:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌDŝƚĐŚŽĨĨ͕ƐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJǁĞƵƌŐĞLJŽƵĂŶĚƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐƚŽ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬĂƌĞĂ͘tĞďĞůŝĞǀĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐ ĂƌĞZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚǁŝůůŶŽƚŽŶůLJďĞďĞŶĞĨŝĐŝĂůĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞŶŝŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ďƵƚ ĨŽƌƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJĂƐĂǁŚŽůĞ͘dŚŝƐƚLJƉĞŽĨ^ĞŶŝŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƐƚĂŐĞƐŽĨ ĐĂƌĞĨŽƌŽƵƌĞůĚĞƌůLJǁŝƚŚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĐŽƐƚƚŽƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ƚǁŝůůĂůƐŽŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂďLJƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŽƚŚĞƌƚLJƉĞƐŽĨƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŽƵůĚ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞ͘tĞƵƌŐĞĂLJĞƐǀŽƚĞĨŽƌĨŝŶĂůĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚŝƐǀĞƌLJǁŽƌƚŚǁŚŝůĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ ͘<ĞŶŶĞƚŚ,LJĂƚƚ ŚƌŝƐƚŝŶĞ:͘,LJĂƚƚ ĂŶǀŝůůĞ͕ϵϰϱϬϲ &ƌŽŵ͗ĐŚĞŶŵŝŶŐŚƵ ĂƚĞ͗&ƌŝ͕EŽǀϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮĂƚϵ͗ϯϴWD ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗WůĞĂƐĞǀŽƚĞĨŽƌŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ dŽ͗фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Đ͗ф:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐфĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐфƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕ фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I am a retired professor of UC Berkeley and a recipient of the US Medal of Technology and Innovation. I have lived in Alamo for over 20 years. I could not find a satisfactory continuous care retirement community in Contra Costa. Therefore, I moved to Alameda County. There, my wife and I have since supported many civic and philanthropic projects including the Chenming and Margaret Hu Medical Center of the Asian Health Services in Oakland. I would like to move back to Walnut Creek when Diablo Glen, proposed by the best CCRC operator in California, is completed. With the baby boomer generation retiring, there is a shortage of good CCRC and a great opportunity to attract retirees and boost the economy of Contra Costa County. Please approve the Diablo Glen CCRC. ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ŚĞŶŵŝŶŐ,Ƶ d^DŚĂŝƌWƌŽĨĞƐƐŽƌŵĞƌŝƚƵƐ hŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͕ĞƌŬĞůĞLJ ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĞĞĐƐ͘ďĞƌŬĞůĞLJ͘ĞĚƵͬΕŚƵͬ &ƌŽŵ͗DŝŬĞ>ĂŵďŽƌŶ ^ĞŶƚ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϮϰ͗ϰϵWD dŽ͗ũŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ Đ͗ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗^hWWKZd/E'ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ /ŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĂƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŽĨŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJĨŽƌϱϰLJĞĂƌƐĂŶĚƌĂŝƐĞĚŵLJĨĂŵŝůLJŚĞƌĞ͘DLJǁŝĨĞĂŶĚ/ĂƌĞ ƚƌLJŝŶŐƚŽƉůĂŶĨŽƌŽƵƌĨƵƚƵƌĞĂƐǁĞĂƌĞǁĞůůŝŶƚŽŽƵƌϳϬ͛Ɛ͘tĞĂƌĞǀĞƌLJĨĂŵŝůŝĂƌǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌŽĨ ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌŽƚŚĞƌƌĞƚŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŽĨĨĞƌƐĂƉĞƌĨĞĐƚƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶ ƚŽƚŚĞŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐƉĞŽƉůĞŽĨŽƵƌĂŐĞĂƌĞĐŽŶĨƌŽŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚ͘KƵƌ͞ǁŽƌůĚ͟ƚŚĞƉĂƐƚϱϰLJĞĂƌƐŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJĂŶĚǁĞĚĞĞƉůLJĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽůŝǀĞŽƵƚŽƵƌƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐLJĞĂƌƐƌŝŐŚƚŚĞƌĞ͘ /ƐĂƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽŽŵŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘/ ĐĂŶĞĂƐŝůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJǁŝƚŚƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽŽƉƉŽƐĞĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĚƵĞƚŽĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕Ă ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉĞƌŝŽĚŽĨŶŽŝƐĞ͕ĂŶĚůŽƐƐŽĨǁŚĂƚŶŽǁŝƐŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͖ĂůůǀĂůŝĚĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ǁŚĂƚĞǀĞƌ ďĞĐŽŵĞƐŽĨƚŚŽƐĞƚǁŽƉĂƌĐĞůƐƚŚŽƐĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐǁŝůůĂůǁĂLJƐďĞƚŚĞƐĂŵĞ͘ dŚĞ^ĞǀĞŶ,ŝůůƐ^ĐŚŽŽůŵŽƵŶƚĞĚďLJĨĂƌƚŚĞŵŽƐƚǀŽĐĂůŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƉĂƌĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƐƚĂĨĨŽĨ^ĞǀĞŶ,ŝůůƐ ĐĂŵĞŽƵƚŝŶĨŽƌĐĞƚŽǀŽŝĐĞƚŚĞŝƌŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ͘/ŚĂǀĞŐƌĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂŶĚĂŵŶŽƚƚŚĞůĞĂƐƚďŝƚŝŶƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞƚŽ ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂƚ^ĞǀĞŶ,ŝůůƐ͘,ĂǀŝŶŐƐĂŝĚƚŚĂƚ͕/ƐŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJĨĞůƚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞLJƵƐĞĚƐĞǀĞƌĂů͞ƚŚĞ ĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂƌĞŐŽŝŶŐƚŽďĞŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞůLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚĂŶĚͬŽƌŚĂƌŵĞĚ͟ĞdžĐƵƐĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŝƌŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ͘/ ĐĂŶ͛ƚĚŝƐĂŐƌĞĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐůĂŝŵƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐΘƐƚĂĨĨǁŝůůďĞĞĨĨĞĐƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƉĞƌŚĂƉƐŝŶĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶĐĞĚ ĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕/ĚŽŶ͛ƚƐĞĞŝƚĂƐ͞ƚŚĞƐŬLJŝƐĨĂůůŝŶŐ͟ǁŚŝĐŚǁĂƐǁŚĂƚŝƌĞƉĞĂƚĞĚůLJŚĞĂƌĚ ĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘ dŚĞƐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐďĞĐŽŵĞĞŵŽƚŝŽŶĂů͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞLJƐŚŽƵůĚŶ͛ƚ͘ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶǁŝůůƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƐĞǀĞƌĂůŽĨLJŽƵƌ ŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂĐŽŶƐƚŝƚƵĞŶĐLJĨŽƌLJĞĂƌƐƚŽĐŽŵĞ͕ĂŶĚǁŝůůďĞĐŽŵĞĂƚĞƌƌŝĨŝĐĂƐƐĞƚƚŽƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ WůĞĂƐĞǀŽƚĞŝŶĨĂǀŽƌŽĨŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ͘ dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵ͊ ĞƐƚǁŝƐŚĞƐ͕ DŝŬĞ>ĂŵďŽƌŶ >ĂŵďŽƌŶ&ĂŵŝůLJsŝŶĞLJĂƌĚƐ ,ŽǁĞůůDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ͕EĂƉĂsĂůůĞLJ From: David Snyder Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 2:17 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us; johngioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Please Vote Yes on Spieker/Diablo Glen Project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, My wife and I support the Spieker/Diablo Glen Project as by far the best way to develop the land in question- -having the least environmental impact and the highest benefit for the Walnut Creek area as a whole. This developer and the multiple CCRC’s they have built and currently run in California are outstanding operations and they have excellent reputations in their communities. You have only to look to the Stoneridge Creek CCRC in Pleasanton for proof of this. We were especially pleased to read the Planning Commission’s staff report on the project and its strong recommendation for project approval. Please vote to approve the project immediately. Thank you, David P Snyder &ƌŽŵ͗DŝĐŚĂĞůĂƐĞLJ ĂƚĞ͗^Ăƚ͕EŽǀϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϮĂƚϭϭ͗ϰϳD ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶWƌŽũĞĐƚ dŽ͗фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Đ͗ф:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕ фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͕фĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх DLJǁŝĨĞĂŶĚ/ŚĂǀĞůŝǀĞĚŝŶtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬĨŽƌĞůĞǀĞŶLJĞĂƌƐ͘tĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽǀŽŝĐĞ ŽƵƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘/ŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĂŵĞŵďĞƌŽĨƚŚĞ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬůŬƐ>ŽĚŐĞĨŽƌŵĂŶLJLJĞĂƌƐ͘tĞĂƌĞŝŶŽƵƌůĂƚĞϳϬƐĂŶĚĞĂƌůLJϴϬƐ͘Ɛ ǁĞĂŐĞ͕ǁĞǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͕ƚŚŽƵŐŚǁĞŬŶŽǁƚŚĂƚĂƐĂŐĞ ƚĂŬĞƐŝƚƐƚŽůůƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚŶŽƚďĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘/ƚŝƐǁŝƚŚŐƌĞĂƚŚŽƉĞĨŽƌƵƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐĂƌĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJďĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚŝŶ ƚŚĞŶĞĂƌĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘ tĞŚĂǀĞĨƌŝĞŶĚƐƚŚĂƚŵŽǀĞĚƚŽƚŚĞ^ƚŽŶĞƌŝĚŐĞƌĞĞŬŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶWůĞĂƐĂŶƚŽŶ ǁŚĞŶŝƚĨŝƌƐƚŽƉĞŶĞĚ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝƐďĞŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚďLJ ƚŚĞƐĂŵĞĐŽŵƉĂŶLJĂƐ^ƚŽŶĞƌŝĚŐĞ͘dŚŝƐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐĂƌĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽ ĞŶĂďůĞƐĞŶŝŽƌƐůŝŬĞŽƵƌƐĞůǀĞƐƚŽƐƚĂLJŝŶŽŶĞƉůĂĐĞ͕ĞǀĞŶŝĨŽƵƌŶĞĞĚƐĐŚĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵ ŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚĞĚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚĞǀĞŶƚŽĨƵůůŶƵƌƐŝŶŐŚŽŵĞĐĂƌĞ͘KƵƌ ĨƌŝĞŶĚƐŚĂǀĞĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚĂůůŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŶĞĞĚƐǁŚŝůĞůŝǀŝŶŐĂƚ^ƚŽŶĞƌŝĚŐĞ͘ǀĞƌLJƚŚŝŶŐ ǁŽƌŬĞĚĞdžĂĐƚůLJĂƐƉƌŽŵŝƐĞĚ͘dŚĞƉĞĂĐĞŽĨŵŝŶĚĂŶĚĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶĐĞŽĨŶŽƚŚĂǀŝŶŐƚŽ ŵŽǀĞ͕ĐŽƵƉůĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŽƉƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂŐĂŝŶǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŚĂǀŝŶŐƚŽĨŝŶĚĂŶĚŵŽǀĞ ƚŽĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ŝƐƉĞƌĨĞĐƚĨŽƌƐĞŶŝŽƌĐŝƚŝnjĞŶƐ͘tĞŚĂǀĞǀŝƐŝƚĞĚŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐ ŵĂŶLJƚŝŵĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĨŝŶĚƚŚĞŵƚŽďĞǀĞƌLJŚĂƉƉLJ͕ǁĞůůĐĂƌĞĚĨŽƌĂŶĚĞŶũŽLJŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌ ůĂƚĞƌLJĞĂƌƐ͘ dŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŽƵůĚĂůůŽǁƵƐĂŶĚŵĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƐƚŽĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽůŝǀĞŝŶ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͘ƐĨĂƌĂƐǁĞŬŶŽǁƚŚĞƌĞŝƐŶŽŽƚŚĞƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŝŶtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬƚŚĂƚ ŽĨĨĞƌƐ>>ƚŚĞĂŵĞŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŝƐŽĨĨĞƌŝŶŐ͘tĞďĞůŝĞǀĞƚŚĂƚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ ŝƐƉĞƌĨĞĐƚĨŽƌŽƵƌŶĞĞĚƐ͘/ƚǁŝůůďĞĂŶĂƐƐĞƚĨŽƌtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬƐĞŶŝŽƌƐƚŽƐƚĂLJŝŶ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬĂƐƚŚĞŝƌůŝǀĞƐĞǀŽůǀĞŝŶŽŶĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŶŽƚŚĂǀĞƚŽďĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶĞĚ ĂďŽƵƚŵŽǀŝŶŐ͕ĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐĚŽĐƚŽƌƐ͕ŚŽƐƉŝƚĂůƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƐ͘ tĞƚƌƵůLJŚŽƉĞƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚďƵŝůƚŝŶĂƚŝŵĞůLJĨĂƐŚŝŽŶ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕ DŝĐŚĂĞů>͘ĂƐĞLJ ŝĂŶĞĂƐĞLJ tĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͕Ă͘ϵϰϱϵϱ &ƌŽŵ͗EŽƌŵ>ƵŶĚďĞƌŐ ^ĞŶƚ͗^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϮϴ͗ϱϯD dŽ͗ΖƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖфƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх Đ͗Ζ:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖф:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖ ΖƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖфƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖ ΖĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖфĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх͖ΖƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐΖ фƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐх ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ 0LJǁŝĨĞĂŶĚ/ĂƌĞŽŶƚŚĞůŝƐƚƚŽŵŽǀĞƚŽŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶǁŚĞŶŝƚŝƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂŶĚǁĂŶƚƚŽĚŽĂůůƚŚĂƚǁĞĐĂŶ ƚŽƐĞĞƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘tĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŶŽƚŽŶůLJĚŽĞƐƚŚŝƐŶĞǁĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŵĞĞƚŽƵƌŶĞĞĚƐ ďƵƚŝƐĂůƐŽŐŽŝŶŐƚŽďĞĂƚƌĞŵĞŶĚŽƵƐĂƐƐĞƚĨŽƌŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJ͘ tĞǁĞƌĞďŽƚŚƌĂŝƐĞĚŝŶůĞƌƌŝƚŽĂŶĚŚĂǀĞůŝǀĞĚŝŶDĂƌƚŝŶĞnjĨŽƌŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϱϬLJĞĂƌƐǁŚĞƌĞŚƌŝƐƚLJ ƚĂƵŐŚƚƐĐŚŽŽů͘/ƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞĚůĂǁĨŽƌĂůŵŽƐƚϱϬLJĞĂƌƐ͕ďĂƐŝŶŐŵLJƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞŚĞƌĞŝŶŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚLJ͘KƵƌ ƐŽŶĂŶĚŐƌĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶůŝǀĞŝŶ>ĂĨĂLJĞƚƚĞ͕ŵŽƐƚŽĨŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐĂůƐŽůŝǀĞůŽĐĂůůLJĂŶĚǁĞǁĂŶƚƚŽƐƚĂLJĐůŽƐĞƚŽ ĂůůŽĨƚŚĞŵǁŚĞŶǁĞŵŽǀĞ͘tĞĂůƐŽƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞƚŚĂƚĂƐƚŝŵĞƉĂƐƐĞƐǁĞǁŝůůŶŽƚǁĂŶƚƚŽŚĂǀĞƚŚĞ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐŽƵƌŚŽŵĞ͘tĞĂƌĞŶŽǁϳϰ͕ĂŶĚŝƚŝƐƚŝŵĞĨŽƌƵƐƚŽŵŽǀĞŽŶĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ůŝŬĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶƚŚĂƚĐĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƵƐǁŝƚŚĂŶĞǁĂŶĚĞdžĐŝƚŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŝŶŐĐĂƌĞ ǁĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞǁĞǁŝůůŶĞĞĚĂƐǁĞŐƌŽǁŽůĚĞƌ͘ dŚŝƐŝƐƚŚĞƉĞƌĨĞĐƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĨŽƌƵƐĂŶĚŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨŽƵƌůŽĐĂůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĚďLJ ƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨůŽĐĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽŶƚŚĞǁĂŝƚŝŶŐůŝƐƚ͘Ɛ/ĂŵƐƵƌĞLJŽƵĂƌĞĂǁĂƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐƌĞĂůůLJŶŽƚŚŝŶŐ ůŝŬĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶŝŶƚŚĞŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞĂƌĞĂ͕ĂƉůĂĐĞĐůŽƐĞƚŽƚŚĞ>ĞƐŚĞƌdŚĞĂƚĞƌǁŚĞƌĞǁĞŚĂǀĞƐĞĂƐŽŶ ƚŝĐŬĞƚƐ͕ƚŚĞƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐǁĞůŽǀĞĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŚĂƌŝƚŝĞƐǁĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚůŝŬĞƚŚĞŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂ,ƵŵĂŶĞ^ŽĐŝĞƚLJ͕ƚŚĞ :ŽŚŶDƵŝƌ>ĂŶĚdƌƵƐƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞDŽƵŶƚŝĂďůŽƵĚƵďŽŶ^ŽĐŝĞƚLJ͘ tĞĂƌĞďŽƚŚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝƐƚƐďƵƚǁĞƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůŽĨůĂŶĚƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ ŝŶƚŽŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞƌĞƚĂŝŶĞĚĂƐŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞŐŝǀĞŶŝƚƐnjŽŶŝŶŐĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂĐŬŽĨŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚŽŶƚŚĞƉĂƌƚŽĨ ƚŚĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚďĞŝŶĂƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞůĂƐŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͘ /ŶƐƉĞĂŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐǁŚŽůŝǀĞŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂƚŚĞƌĞŝƐǁŝĚĞƐƉƌĞĂĚĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝƐ ŐŽŝŶŐƚŽďĞĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƚƐĂŐƌĞĂƚƵŶĨŝůůĞĚŶĞĞĚƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĨĂƌůĞƐƐŽĨĂŶŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶ ƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŚĂŶĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕ EŽƌŵĂŶĂŶĚŚƌŝƐƚLJ>ƵŶĚďĞƌŐ EŽƌŵĂŶ͘>ƵŶĚďĞƌŐ ƚƚŽƌŶĞLJĂƚ>Ăǁ DĂƌƚŝŶĞnj͕ϵϰϱϱϯ &ƌŽŵ͗tŝůůŝĂŵy͘DŝŶŽƌ ^ĞŶƚ͗^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϮϴ͗ϮϴD dŽ͗:ŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ Đ͗ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗/Ŷ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ Like many you will hear from during this hearing, I am a decades long resident of Walnut Creek. I am in support of the project because it will add to the fabric of the County and City [when annexed]. If we objectively evaluate the alternatives, one will find that a community of like minded mature adults will result in better outcomes than the alternative of residential homes and condominiums. The Diablo Glen life care project will meet the needs of the underserved senior members of the community and is progressive. It will also allow many of us to remain in the community near our families during the final chapter of our lives. As we mature, this has a TREMENDOUS beneficial emotional component, that I suspect the board is too young to appreciate. Many Walnut Creek residents present the "NIMBY" objection raising concerns about the scope of the project and the density of residents. However, if we objectively evaluate the zoned alternative, high-density single-family housing with the possibility of ADU additions, the result will be higher and recurring traffic patterns when compared to a community of mature diverse adults whose ages are typically 75 and above.  It is my sincere hope that the county affirms the application and allows the project to commence without delay. Sincerely, William X. Minor, CPA From:Norman Prickett To:supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc:johngioia@bos.cccounty.us <johngioia@bos.cccounty.us>;supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>;supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us>; district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Sent:Saturday, November 12, 2022 at 05:42:43 PM PST Subject:A "YES" VOTE FOR DIABLO GLEN Dear Supervisors of Contra Costa County, My wife and I are writing you today to ask for your YES VOTE on the proposed Diablo Glen Project. Listed are the reasons we feel a Yes vote is the right vote. 1. We have lived in Contra Costa County since 1987 and are nearing the age where a retirement community is a most attractive option for continued quality of life in retirement. 2. We toured Stoneridge Creek in Pleasanton and were most impressed. It is beautiful, spotless, well managed and has facilities for special care on site whenever needed for all residents. Diablo Glen will be a unique senior community as well in Walnut Creek within walking distance of Heather Farms, John Muir Hospital and downtown. 3. Because of this excellent location the traffic impact on the surrounding neighborhoods would be minimal. 4. Most senior residents would do their shopping and also seek entertainment close by keeping this revenue in the City of Walnut Creek. We respectfully submit the above reasons for a YES VOTE on what will be a wonderful addition to the City of Walnut Creek and a safe haven for senior citizens. Thank You, Norman and Sherry Prickett November 12, 2022 &ƌŽŵ͗:ŽŚŶzŽƐƚ ^ĞŶƚ͗^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϮϰ͗ϮϴWD dŽ͗ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌŵŝƚĐŚŽĨĨΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ Đ͗^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌĂŶĚĞƌƐĞŶΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ũŽŚŶͺ'ŝŽŝĂΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ ƐƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌͺďƵƌŐŝƐΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ͖ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϱΛďŽƐ͘ĐĐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ƵƐ ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗tĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ͊ >ĂĚŝĞƐĂŶĚ'ĞŶƚůĞŵĞŶŽĨƚŚĞŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽĂƌĚŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌƐ͗ tĞĂƌĞǁƌŝƚŝŶŐŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨŽƌĂŶĞǁ^ĞŶŝŽƌƐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͕ ĐĂůůĞĚŝĂďůĞ'ůĞŶ͘ƐǁŝƚŚŵĂŶLJŽĨŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐ͕ŵĂŶLJŽĨǁŚŽŵůŝǀĞŝŶ^ĂŶ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕ůĂŵĞĚĂĂŶĚ ŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞĂůƌĞĂĚLJƉĂŝĚĂĚĞƉŽƐŝƚƚŽŚŽůĚĂƉůĂĐĞŝŶůŝŶĞĨŽƌƚŚŝƐĨƵƚƵƌĞůŝǀŝŶŐ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘&ŽƌƵƐ͕ĂĨƚĞƌůŝǀŝŶŐŝŶůĂŵĞĚĂŽƵŶƚLJƐŝŶĐĞŐƌĂĚƵĂƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵhĞƌŬĞůĞLJŽǀĞƌϱϬLJĞĂƌƐĂŐŽ͕ ĂŵŽǀĞƚŽtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬ͕ƚŽƚŚĞŝĂďůĞ'ůĞŶĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ŵĂŬĞƐŐƌĞĂƚƐĞŶƐĞƚŽƵƐ͘ &ŝƌƐƚ͕ǁĞůŽǀĞtĂůŶƵƚƌĞĞŬĂŶĚĂůůƚŚĂƚŝƚŽĨĨĞƌƐ͘KǀĞƌƚŚĞůĂƐƚϭϬLJĞĂƌƐ͕ǁĞŚĂǀĞŶŽƚŽŶůLJƐǁŝƚĐŚĞĚŵŽƐƚ ŽĨŽƵƌĚŽĐƚŽƌƐĨƌŽŵ^&ƚŽŽŶƚƌĂŽƐƚĂďĂƐĞƐ͕ďƵƚǁĞĂůƐŽĨŝŶĚƚŚĂƚŶŽǁǁĞĂůƐŽĚŽŵŽƐƚŽĨŽƵƌƐŚŽƉƉŝŶŐ ΗƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƚƵŶŶĞůΗ͘ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƌĞƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚLJƐƚŽƌĞƐ͕ƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘dŚŝƐŶĞǁĐŽƵŶƚLJŚĂƐ ĂůƌĞĂĚLJďĞĐŽŵĞĂĨĂǀŽƌŝƚĞŽĨŽƵƌƐ͘ ^ĞĐŽŶĚ͕ǁĞůŽǀĞƚŚĞĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐŽĨŝĂďůĞ'ůĞŶ͘^ĞĐƵƌŝŶŐĂŚŽŵĞ͕ŵĞĂůƉƌŝǀŝůĞŐĞƐĂŶĚŵĞĚŝĐĂů ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞͲͲĂůůŝŶŽŶĞƉůĂĐĞͲͲŵĞĂŶƐƚŚĂƚǁĞΖůůďĞĚŽŝŶŐĂůŽƚůĞƐƐĚƌŝǀŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽďĂďůLJ͕ŝŶĂůů͕ ƐƉĞŶĚŝŶŐůĞƐƐŵŽŶĞLJĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚŵĞĚŝĐĂůŚĞůƉ͕ůĞĂǀŝŶŐŵŽƌĞŵŽŶĞLJĨŽƌĞŶƚĞƌƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌ ĞdžƚƌĂĐƵƌƌŝĐƵůĂƌŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚŝƌĚ͕ǁĞĚŽŶΖƚďĞůŝĞǀĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƚŚĞŝĂďůĞ'ůĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝůůďĞŶĞĂƌůLJĂƐĚĞŶƐĞĂƐ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂďƵŶĐŚŽĨƐŝŶŐůĞŽǁŶĞƌŚŽŵĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁĞƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƐƉĂĐĞŝƐĂůƐŽnjŽŶĞĚĨŽƌ͘/ŶĨĂĐƚ͕ƚŚŝƐ ŝƐŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐǁĞůŝŬĞĂďŽƵƚŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶͲͲƚŚĞĚĞŶƐŝƚLJŝƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶLJŽƵƚLJƉŝĐĂůůLJĨŝŶĚŝŶƐĞŶŝŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĨŽƌŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ĂƐƐŝƐƚĞĚůŝǀŝŶŐ͕ĞƚĐ͘ĂŶĚŵƵĐŚůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶLJŽƵΖĚĞdžƉĞĐƚƚŽ ĨŝŶĚŝŶĂƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ &ŽƵƌƚŚ͕ƚŚĞƉĞŽƉůĞǁĞΖǀĞŵĞƚͲͲƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐĂŶĚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŽƌƐͲͲƐĞĞŵ ůŝŬĞǀĞƌLJŶŝĐĞ͕ĂŶĚƐŵĂƌƚƉĞŽƉůĞ͘dŚĞŬŝŶĚŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞƚŚĂƚĂŶLJŽŶĞǁŽƵůĚǁĞůĐŽŵĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŝƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ &ŝĨƚŚ͕ĂůůŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂŐĞƐŽĨůŝĨĞǁŝůůďĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ŐĞĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ͕ƚŽŽ͘ŶĚ͕ĨŽůŬƐŝŶ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƐƚĂŐĞƐŽĨĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐͲͲŝƚΖƐǀĞƌLJĐŽŵĨŽƌƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚŝŶŬƚŚĂƚŵŽƐƚŽĨƚŚĞŚĞĂůƚŚŝƐƐƵĞƐ ǁĞĨĂĐĞŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŽƵůĚďĞĂĐĐŽŵŽĚĂƚĞĚŝŶĂƉůĂĐĞůŝŬĞŝĂďůŽ'ůĞŶ͘ &ŝŶĂůůLJ͕ŝƚΖƐŶŝĐĞƚŽƚŚŝŶŬƚŚĂƚŝŶĂƉůĂĐĞůŝŬĞ'͕ǁĞĐŽƵůĚĂĐƚƵĂůůLJŐĞƚďLJǁŝƚŚĂƐŝŶŐůĞĐĂƌĂŶĚŶŽƚƚŚĞƚǁŽ ǁĞΖǀĞďĞĞŶƐĂĚĚůĞĚǁŝƚŚĨŽƌƚŚĞůĂƐƚϰϬнLJĞĂƌƐ͘ tĞŚŽƉĞLJŽƵƐĞĞƚŚĞƐĞĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞƐƚŽŽĂŶĚǁĞŚŽƉĞƚŚĂƚLJŽƵǀŽƚĞŝŶĨĂǀŽƌŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ƐŽƚŚĂƚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽŶ'ĐĂŶďĞŐŝŶ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕:ŽŚŶĂŶĚ^ƚĂĐLJzŽƐƚ Page Date Received Doc Dated From Description 1 11/12/2022 Skow, Richard & Bonnie email (support) 2 11/13/2022 White, Bill & Ann email (support) 3 11/13/2022 Hawkins, Linda & Steve email (support) 4 11/13/2022 Johannessen, Neil email (support) 5 11/13/2022 Trowbridge, Lynn & Tom email (support) 6 11/14/2022 Cole, Marillyn email (support) 7 11/14/2022 Sladnick, Carolyn email (support) 8 11/14/2022 Kalm, Denise email (support) 9 11/14/2022 Nakashima, Susan email (support) 10 11/14/2022 Schraga, Burt & Karen email (support) 11 11/14/2022 Dase, Eleanor email (support) 12 11/15/2022 Cronk, Janet & Rick email (support) 13 11/15/2022 Weight, Sharon email (support) 14 11/15/2022 Frankel, Richard email (support) 15 11/15/2022 Trudell, Linda email (support) From: Richard Skow Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 2:25 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.county.us Cc: supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: In Support of Diablo Glen As a more than fifty year resident of Contra Costa County my wife and I look forward to living in a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) like the planned Diablo Glen (DG) development. This is the first and only such CCRC in Contra Costa County (CCC). We moved to CCC in 1969, and subsequently moved to the Rancho Paraiso development in 1998. We have had a life in CCC that we enjoy and want to continue living in the area where our roots are deeply established and our two sons’ and their families make their home. The care and daily living opportunities offered by DG meet all of our needs. Our current home in Rancho Paraiso will make an excellent home for a younger family looking for an established community with excellent schools and all the offerings of the area. The pre-construction response to DG is exciting with more than 600 individuals putting down a deposit on a home in DG; 80% of whom live in the immediate area. This clearly demonstrates a need for such a development in the area. My wife and I look forward to DG being approved by the Board of Supervisors as we know that it will be one of the gems the County boasts about in the future. If I can provide any additional information or answer any questions feel free to contact me. Richard and Bonnie Skow Walnut Creek From: ANN WHITE Date: November 13, 2022 at 6:14:50 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support for the Diablo Glen Project We have lived in the county since 1976 and enjoyed all the amenities available to us all these years. We raised two daughters and have been in our same home during this time. Now with everyone grown we have been looking to downsize to make our four bedroom home available to another family to enjoy. We have scouted out many options including Rossmoor but we really only want to make one move. Diablo Glen is ideal for us and it is in our desired neighborhood. We feel it is a great option for that property and there is such tremendous interest in this type of living. The people who move there will be making many family size homes available for purchase in the county and can still stay in their “ hood” too, where there are lots of opportunities for good entertainment and culture. We hope you will approve the project as we would like to make it our next home. Ann & Bill White. Concord, CA. From: Linda Hawkins Date: Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:22 AM Subject: Request to SUPPORT the Diablo Glen Project To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us> We are voicing our strong support for the Diablo Glen project for a number of reasons. Among them are: • California has a severe need for more housing and Diablo Glen’s 350+ units will likely house well over 500-600 people. Those who would prefer that this property remain open space are ignoring these needs for their own personal reasons. • Continuing Care Retirement Communities in the Bay Area are very scarce compared to the growing demand and many have wait times of multiple years for acceptance. • While some have said Diablo Glen is just a posh, high-end facility for only the wealthy, they are gravely mistaken. Having investigated many Bay Area options we know that costs are significantly higher in many similar continuing care developments • The extremely high cost of assisted senior care will only grow over time and the lack of these facilities will just exacerbate the dilemma for ALL of us who are or will be aging and find ourselves in need of these services • one way or another, this property will be developed and the impact of development on the community (e. g. traffic congestion) will be significantly less with Diablo Glen than with an alternative single family home development Please consider these reasons as you vote and we urge you to APPROVE the Diablo Glen project so that it can move forward. Linda and Steve Hawkins From: neil johannessen To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us <john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us>; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2022 at 04:13:43 PM UTC Subject: Support for Diablo Glen I want to add my voice to those expressing support for the proposed senior housing development Diablo Glen. I'm a 30+ year resident & live on Marchbanks Dr about 1 block from the site for the development. I am looking forward to moving into Diablo Glen once things are completed. I'm aware that there are some in my neighborhood who have opposed the project in the past but I believe that many of their concerns have already been addressed. Some of my neighbors have now changed their opinions and are now supporters ! Thanks for your consideration, Neil Johannessen Walnut Creek From: Lynn Trowbridge Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2022 2:40 PM To: 'supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us' <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: 'John_Giola@bos.cccounty.us' <John_Giola@bos.cccounty.us>; 'supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us' <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; 'supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us' <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; 'district5@bos.cccounty.us' <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: Support for Diablo Glen To: Karen Mitchoff My husband and I wish to support the effort to bring Diablo Glen to Contra Costa County. We have lived in Orinda of 46 years and are deeply rooted here. We have both served in a number of volunteer rolls over the years and wish to continue that both in Orinda and in CCCounty. Tom was Orinda’s Citizen of the Year in 2020. We are, however, both in our early 80’s and while still active would like to downsize and simplify living and, at the same time, prepare for the years ahead in a place like Diablo Glen. We think that Diablo Glen will offer an arrangement for us to do that and have placed a deposit down in hopes your support will make this opportunity possible for us. We agree that the location chosen will fit into the community nicely with less environmental impact than other sorts of development. At the same time Diablo Glen will fill a real need for older residents of CCC who want to stay in the area near family, friends, and community connections built up over many years. Thank you for taking into account the voices of potential residents of Diablo Glen who are currently long time residents of Contra Costa County. Lynn and Tom Trowbridge, Orinda, CA 94563 From: Marillyn Cole To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us <john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us>; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 11:52:18 AM PST Subject: Please support the Spieker project Diablo Glen Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, I respectfully request your support for the development of the Spieker senior development project Diablo Glen. I have been a homeowner in Contra Costa County for 45 years, mostly in Walnut Creek. I feel deeply connected to this community, and I really want to remain here. Living in Diablo Glen would free me from home-maintenance and allow me to “age in in place” in a friendly, supportive community of seniors. Long-term care would be available in the same community should I ever need it, eliminating the risk of having to navigate this in a crisis. Diablo Glen is the perfect answer for someone like me! My move to Diablo Glen would also benefit our community, as my current house in Walnut Creek would become available to a growing family in need of a roomy house on a large lot. I believe this is likely the case for most of the future residents of the 354 homes in Diablo Glen, who would release their homes to the community years earlier than they otherwise might. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Marillyn Cole, Walnut Creek From: Carolyn Sladnick Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 8:14 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us; John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: In support of Diablo Glen Dear Supervisor Mitchoff: This is to respectfully request your approval of the Diablo Glen project. I had planned on being present for the meeting in which the Diablo Glen project was on the agenda, however my fiancé recently suffered a cervical fracture as a result of a fall, and is in a neck brace for the next several months, which makes it extremely difficult for him to ride in a low profile car such as mine. Had a facility such as Diablo Glen been in existence in the Walnut Creek area, we would have been able to attend the meeting in person, as there would have been a high profile, accessible shuttle available to transport us. As a resident of Contra Costa County for the past 35 years, I am intimately familiar with the area and have been deeply involved in many aspects of the community over the years. My children were raised here, attended school and worked part time during their teenage years. We all developed strong connections socially, supported local businesses, religious institutions, and our doctors are all in the county. As my fiancé and I are in our early 70’s, we recognize that life as we have known it is changing. Our needs are becoming greater, and it is clear the time is soon coming for us to move into a supportive community such as Diablo Glen, which is why we are a depositor. My vision is no longer such that it is safe to drive at night, or in new areas, and my fiancé is legally blind. Moving within the County to a facility that offers the continuing care model of a CCRC is what we need in the next few years. Given my familiarity with the area, Diablo Glen offers me maximum independence, while providing support as needed. Please take the above to heart as you make your decision concerning Diablo Glen. My contact information follows should you wish to reach out. Thank you. Regards, Carolyn Sladnick From: "Denise P. Kalm" Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 4:54 PM To: SupervisorMitchoff <SupervisorMitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: John_Gioia <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, Supervisor_Andersen <SupervisorAndersen@bos.cccounty.us>, Supervisor_Burgis <Supervisor_Burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, District5 <District5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: Support for the Diablo Glen project I've lived in Walnut Creek for over 40 years and come to love it. I'd like to stay here, but the only way that's going to happen is if the Diablo Glen project is approved. Our next (and last move) has to be to a Life Care Community or CCRC. My husband is a good bit older and we both need the chance to stay where we are, but "graduate," as needed to assisted living and/or memory care. We also might need skilled nursing. All of these are provided as part of this kind of community. We also value the planned activities, transportation and dining options we'll increasingly need as we age. Stoneridge is the only other viable option, but we know no one in Pleasanton. We'd hate to have to start over at our age, but if this project isn't approved, we'd have to look at moving, perhaps even to the great facilities in Scottsdale, AZ, taking with us our savings (and taxes). This is a well-planned project, the lightest use for the space and attractively designed. The planners have done several of these and all are successful. So, there is no worry about the project failing. In fact, early signups have gone way beyond the number that can be accommodated, indicating the serious need in Walnut Creek. I know the environmental group didn't approve it, but I think they didn't listen closely enough. The developers plan to put more trees in than are already there. There will be less traffic than any other development, given that many seniors give up their cars at some point. Proximity to a hospital is critical for seniors - where else in WC can you get this? You also have to look at the impact to the County and city if it isn't approved. People love the CCRC concept - my father lived and died in one in FL and it was the best gift he could have given to us, the survivors. It simplifies your estate. But importantly, do you wish to lose the tax benefits of the retirees this place would support, as well as their spending? People who want this kind of living situation will take their money elsewhere, not continue to stay where they are. But for many, they wish to stay where they have friends and family, know the area, have access to the amenities. But this is a more affluent group than most and they will take their money somewhere else if you don't let this project continue. In fact, if you delay too long, many will have already found other CCRCs to move to. I beg you to look at the larger picture and understand the value of this project and your resident seniors to our county. Denise P. Kalm, Writer, Speaker, Coach From: Susan Nakashima Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 11:52 AM To: SupervisorMitchoff <SupervisorMitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: John_Gioia <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, Supervisor_Andersen <SupervisorAndersen@bos.cccounty.us>, "suervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us" <suervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, District5 <District5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: In Support of Diablo Glen Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I am writing in support of the proposed Diablo Glen Retirement community to be approved for the Seven Hills Ranch property in Walnut Creek. I have lived in this area since 1992, and love knowing that, if I choose, I can move to a continuing care retirement community that is near my circle of friends and family as well as near the nature trails, commercial, cultural and medical offerings that have been part of my life over the past three decades. Diablo Glen will help fill the need for additional senior hous ing including long term care, while at the same time not causing a significant impact on the environment. The property is already designated for development. I am supportive of the approval of this project. Kind regards, Susan Nakashima Martinez, California From: Burt Schraga Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:41 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; Candace Andersen: <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; Diane Burgis: <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; Federal Glover: <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: I support Diablo Glen My wife and I fully support the building of Diablo Glen. One of the arguments that I heard from neighbors at the planning committee meeting was traffic. Most senior citizens communities drive one vehicle. Compare that to a family of four with teenagers. That usually equates to 4 cars. Do senior citizens speed? NO. Do teenagers? YES. Do senior citizens play loud music and have parties with loud music and several cars late into the night? NO. Do young adults? YES. Do senior citizens make good neighbors? We all know the answer. Approve Diablo Glen Burt & Karen Schraga Santa Rosa, CA From: eleanor dase Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:00 PM Subject: enthusiastic support for Diablo Glen To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Giola@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Dear Supervisors, I have lived in the Lamorinda area for the past 50 years and was thrilled to learn about Diablo Glen, both for its services and its location. Our youngest daughter attended Seven Hills for several years and I was on their Board several years ago; I treasured the bucolic and peaceful setting of the School. Just as that setting is ideal for a school, it is also ideal for a retirement community. Additionally, as Head of The Athenian School in Danville for 17 years, I immediately thought of the numerous ways in which Seven Hills and Diablo Glen could be mutually supportive and enriching. As a former high school math teacher, I would love to volunteer as a math helper at Seven Hills a few times each week, and I am sure that other residents would likewise be enthusiastic about sharing their talents and strengths with students on a voluntary basis- perhaps with writing, in the garden or library, with technology, science labs or sports, or with special projects or theme days. Additionally, I envision Seven Hills' students sharing concerts and plays at Diablo Glen, perhaps practicing a presentation, or parading in Halloween costumes - all without having to get on a bus! There is so much value in having meaningful interactions between the two generations. Thank you for the thoughtful and careful work you do in consideration of new projects. I hope for a positive outcome in the weeks ahead. Sincerely, Eleanor Dase From: Janet Cronk Subject: Please Approve Diablo Glen! Date: November 15, 2022 at 5:40:35 PM PST To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, My husband and I want to encourage you to pass the Diablo Glen EIR and move on with this great project. We hope to be one of the first to move in…perhaps 4 years from now. We know from personal experience that Continuing Life builds excellent quality communities for seniors in California. The development, when complete, will be such a benefit for Walnut Creek, providing well designed, thoughtful housing for active, but older, people. Nothing of this superb quality is available locally. We also feel the Diablo Glen development makes excellent use of a tricky, landlocked site. After completion, the EIR clearly states that it will have less impact on the neighbors than the current zoning for single family homes. Best, Janet and Rick Cronk Lafayette Citizens of the Year, 2020 Lafayette, CA 94549-2423 From: Sharon Weight Date: Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:01 PM Subject: We Support Diablo Glen! To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us>, Dave Weight Dear Ms. Mitchoff, I am writing in support of the new Diablo Glen Retirement Community. We are lifelong Bay Area residents who are eager to make the next move to a more supported lifestyle. There are so many things that make Diablo Glen the right move for us. We love Walnut Creek and all the amenities it offers including cultural events, great shopping, and wonderful restaurants. We have an active lifestyle and the proximity to Heather Farms Park and the walking trails is a big plus. Another important component for us is access to the great medical care that Walnut Creek has in abundance. Walnut Creek is such a central location for visits to San Francisco and other areas of interest. We would also be close to family while knowing that we would not be a burden to them as we age. We were so happy to read that the EIP analysis shows that the project will not cause a significant effect on the environment. That is important to us. It is also important to note that as well as preserving 81existing trees, the development will plant 1000 new trees. We have looked and looked for senior communities that offer comprehensive housing, services, amenities, and future care options in one development. Diablo Glen offers all of that in a beautiful setting. We are excited about having the opportunity to move into a new community with others who will soon be our new friends and neighbors. We hope that this community will be approved and built. I believe we will be a great asset to the community. Sincerely, -- Sharon Weight From: Richard ("Dick") Frankel Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 5:49 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor burgis@bos.cc; district5@bos.cc Subject: Support Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community Project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff: In 1971, my wife and I first moved to Walnut Creek. I commuted to work by Greyhound bus from Walnut Creek to San Francisco. We went bowling where a Ross Store is now located. There was a single screen theater on Main Street. Gemco predated Target. The Coop Market predated Sprouts. Change happens. In 1971, I never heard of a continuing care community. We didn’t have children then. Now, our adult children reside in New York City and San Diego. One of the attributes of a project such as Diablo Glen is that children need not worry about providing care for aging parents. There are other local community advantages of Diablo Glen. We have resided in our present home since 1979, a short distance from the proposed project. It benefits the community to have younger families move into the neighborhood. The tax base increases. Local schools can retain faculty and staff with sustained student enrollment. The community retains its vibr ancy. If we remain in Contra Costa County and chose to reside at a continuing care facility, we seniors can continue to participate in volunteer organizations. I regularly volunteer for Contra Costa – Solano Food Bank, White Pony Express, and related acti vities (SIRs, Walnut Creek Seniors, Kiwanis Club of San Ramon Valley). I am able to serve Contra Costa County on the Assessors Appeal Board, appointed by the Board of Supervisors as the District IV board member. My wife and I regularly attend performances at the Lesher Center. Remaining in the community allows us to continue participating in these activities. Some of us are at the forefront of the aging “Baby Boomers.” Some seniors are delighted to age in place. Others move in with family or friends. A continuing care facility is another alternative that permits seniors to remain in their community, enjoy established connections with social and religious groups, maintain professional relationships with long -established health care providers and if needed, have access to three levels of care. Walnut Creek has evolved over the years. Broadway Plaza was built in 1951 (JC Penny, Sears, Woolworths, Lucky Supermarket, Joseph Magnin). Rancho San Miguel was built beginning in 1955 (535 homes including 375 Eichlers), across from Heather Farm Park. Northgate High School opened in 1974. Change happens. The proposed project both enhances local quality of life and provides economic benefits to the community. Sincerely, Richard Frankel From: Linda Trudell Date: November 15, 2022 at 1:42:17 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support of DIABLO GLEN in Walnut Creek Thank you for your attention to this very important project for so many seniors in the Bay Area. I personally am, as I am sure others are, in need of a community like Diablo Glen. As a 75 year old single woman, I personally will require the interaction and activities with others as I now live alone and no family capable of tending to my aging needs. It’s a huge plus that Diablo Glen is also a continuing care community (CCRC). Diablo Glen will be an essential community for the Walnut Creek area as there are very few CCRC’s in any nearby cities to the caliber that Diablo Glen will be. I personally was looking to relocate to Walnut Creek for many reasons: the layout and beauty of the City, the safety, the parks and activities, the fabulous restaurants and the vast array of shopping. Many seniors, including myself, will be dependent on this type of community. Please consider and approve Diablo Glen for the benefit of the elderly and Walnut Creek. Thank you, Linda D. Trudell Page Date Received Doc Dated From Description 1 11/15/2022 Jackson, Marian email (support) 2 11/15/2022 Kiriluk, Saundra email (support) 3 11/15/2022 Menzhuber, Jack email (support) 4 11/16/2022 Hill, Berry Lynne email (support) 5 11/16/2022 Carns, Bob & Carleen email (support) 6 11/16/2022 Carter, Sylvia email (support) 7 11/16/2022 Wishnev, Martha Ann email (support) 8 11/16/2022 Vera, Servando email (support) 9 11/17/2022 Haas, Melvin email (support) 10 11/17/2022 Murphy, Tim email (support) 11 11/17/2022 Johnson, Kathryn & Culver, JP email (support) 12 11/17/2022 Cardwell, Susan & Rich email (support) 13 11/17/2022 Finney, Kimberly & Larry email (support) 14 11/17/2022 Bradley, James & Marylou email (support) 15 11/17/2022 Liston, Rita email (support) From: MARIAN JACKSON To: "pervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us" <pervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: "John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us" <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, "supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us" <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, "supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us" <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, "district5@bos.cccounty.us" <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Date: 11/15/2022 10:12 AM Subject: In Suport of the Diablo Glen Development Dear Supervisor Karen Mitchoff: RE: In Suport of the Diablo Glen Development I don’t usually voice my opinion on developments, but wanted to weigh in to SUPPORT the Diablo Glen project. Please approve the Diablo Glen Development. As an older resident of Contra Costa County, I think a development like the one in Pleasanton is a needed in Walnut Creek. I’m 67 years old and have friends who would benefit from such a development. We need it in our community, especially if it is like the CCRC in Pleasanton. From what I understand, it would have less environmental impact than the approved use of housing, and better use of the land. Please approve the Diablo Glen development project. Thank you. Sincerely, Marian Jackson Martinez, CA 94553 cc: Supervisor John Gioia Supervisor Candice Anderson Supervisor Diane Burgos Supervisor Federal Glover From: Sande Kiriluk Date: November 15, 2022 at 1:35:16 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us, johngioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Re: Requesting your Yes Vote on Spieker/Diablo Glen Project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, Both I and my husband support this CCRC project for many reasons. We would certainly like to live there at some point. And while we understand the nearby school would prefer to be next to undeveloped land, sooner or later there will be development and construction disruption, no matter what kind of housing is built there. Walnut Creek, like all CA communities, must increase housing. The Spieker project provides density with less traffic and looks like it will be quite attractive. We attended much of the Planning Commission meeting, read their staff report, and were struck by the staff’s strong support of the project, so we were very surprised by the Commission’s No vote. I hope you will give full consideration to the staff report, and to the CCRC developer’s record of creating successful communities while maintaining excellent relationships with local authorities. Thank you for your consideration and please vote Yes! Sincerely, Sande Kiriluk From: JACK MENZHUBER To: supervisormitchoff@bos.ccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.ccounty.us> Cc: supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; john_gioia@boscccounty.us <john_gioia@boscccounty.us>; supervisor_burgis@cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@cccounty.us>; district5@bos.cccointy.us <district5@bos.cccointy.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 03:44:22 PM PST Subject: Fw: Please Support Diablo Glen -- From: JACK MENZHUBER To: planninghearing@dcd.cccounty.us <planninghearing@dcd.cccounty.us> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 at 04:38:57 PM PDT Subject: Please Support Diablo Glen I am sending this message with the hope of your positive consideration for approval and go ahead for this development. I have been a resident in Contra Costa county over 75 years. Richmond, Pleasant Hill and Martinez and was employed in Walnut Creek . My family are also long time residents. I am familial with CCRC in Pleasanton knowing several residents there. As a senior I can't think of a more pleasant community and in Walnut Creek, to live the rest of a persons life. I see the use of the land for this type of development to be far more beneficial for a greater majority of our community wishing to remain in Walnut Creek than perhaps senile family housing. I along with so many others in my age group hope you will approve this plan. Sincerely, John Menzhuber From: Lynne Hill Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 11:37 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Letter of Support for Diablo Glen Senior Housing Project Subject: Letter of Support for Diablo Glen Senior Housing Project Dear Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, and other Supervisors, I am writing in support of this project because I am personally interested in living here. My husband and I moved to Concord in 1966 with our two young grade school children. We have lived in several towns in Central Contra Costa since then and are dedicated to this area and its features and benefits. I am looking for our retirement home and community. Sadly, he developed Alzheimer’s disease and now lives in a dedicated Memory Care Facility. This leaves me in our large two story home. I love my neighborhood and would love to stay here but as I age, I know that this is not the right place for me as I will 84 on my next birthday. I am active and independent and am looking forward to living at Diablo Glen when it opens as a wonderful and involved community. I think the community plan is unique in it’s concept and allows residents to maintain a fully active, independent and involved life style. It also provides for aging services as needed among your friends. I don’t write this letter casually. Because of my husband’s illness, I have spent a lot of time researching options and have not found anything like Diablo Glen in the Walnut Creek area. My daughter and her family are in this area. My friends are in this area. The organizations I volunteer for are in this area. I drive an electric car and want to be able to plug it in! I know this area and consider it my “home town” and I am excited to be looking forward to moving to Diablo Glen when it opens. I sincerely hope your analysis supports the benefits and value Diablo Glen will bring to it’s residents, Walnut Creek, and this area. And I know there are many other residents in this area who agree with me. Thank you for reading and considering my letter in support of Diablo Glen Community. I’m ready! Berry Lynne Hill From: Carleen Carns Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:18 PM To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <john_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: in support of Diablo Glen We write to voice our support of the Diablo Glen project. We have lived in the Danville/Alamo area for 45 years. We are ready to downsize our home and move to a community for retired people that offers continuing care. Diablo Glen is the answer to our search. It will allow us to stay in a community we know well, stay close to our friends and health care providers and remain active in our church activities. After searching communities in San Jose and out towards the delta, we were pleased to find that a community has been proposed in Walnut Creek. We like the scale of Diablo Glen, big enough to make many new friends, but not so large as to feel like a separate city. It will provide us an opportunity to participate in activities with our new neighbors and relieve us of many of the duties of homeownership that are getting harder for us to manage. We especially like the idea of getting help when we need it that a continuing care community can offer. We are pleased to see that Diablo Glen will provide senior housing that is so needed in Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County. We look forward to continuing to enjoy all that Walnut Creek has to offer in terms of theater, dining and shopping. We are also pleased that Diablo Glen is an infill project rather than something being built out at the edges of the county. We are excited to make Diablo Glen our new home and encourage approval of this project. Sincerely, Bob & Carleen Carns From: Sylvia Carter Subject: PLEASE VOTE YES ON DIABLO GLEN Date: November 16, 2022 at 9:27:57 AM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us Dear Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, We hope you’ll approve the Diablo Glen senior living community. My husband, Tim, and I as well as many of our friends, would like to downsize to Diablo Glen, where we could live in comfort with the security in knowing all our current and future needs would be met. We have lived all our 55 years of married life in Walnut Creek and Orinda and would happily sell our home if we could live in a place like Diablo Glen. There are no other options in our area that we would consider. We would not leave our friends and children to move to another area thus we would live out our lives in our current home if we did not have a Diablo Glen option. We think this project would be a win for seniors and Contra Costa. Sylvia Carter From: Martha Ann Wishnev Date: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:51 PM Subject: My Strong support of Diablo Glen To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us>, <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us> Hello Supervisor Mitchoff, Please show your support for this project at the upcoming Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors meeting, and please encourage the other supervisors to follow your lead. As the population ages, there is an obvious need for this type of housing. A huge number of people have already put their names on a waiting list. The location for Diablo Glen is perfect; near everything but quiet and very private. Thank you, Martha Ann Wishnev From: Servando Vera Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 11:11 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: district5@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support for Diablo Glen Project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I'd like to express my support for the new Diablo Glen project proposed for Walnut Creek. I have had the pleasure to experience one of the other retirement communities built by Spieker and it is quite impressive. Not only do they do a great job planning the building with careful consideration of the surroundings, but the care that they offer to seniors is outstanding. I also reflect on this senior housing use compared to medium density housing and folks living nearby or children at the school nearby will be impacted by construction either way. This senior housing use has much less long-term impact (e.g. traffic) compared to medium density housing. Thank you, Servando Vera Concord Resident From: Timothy Murphy Date: Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:35 AM Subject: Support for the Diablo Glen Project To: <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> CC: district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us>, <john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us> I urge the Board of Supervisors to approve the Diablo Glen. I have been a Contra Costa County resident for 50 years and have always appreciated the County’s measured, considered supervision of development during that time. As indicated in the Final EIR, Diablo Glen has mitigated any significant adverse impacts of its planned development. The loud, redundant NIMBY opposition from a neighboring school’s parents should not deter the Board from approval of a worthy project. Adequate housing for our existing and emerging population has been identified by state and local entities as a problem that needs a solution. Projects like Diablo Glen are a practical, necessary part of a multi-prong approach to this public policy issue. The State of Californai has mandated that local entities increase the density of their housing to permit more available housing. Projects like Diablo Glen will allow seniors like us to downsize, move into more efficient and ecological housing, make our existing homes available to other families and, importantly, remain in the Contra Costa community with our long time friends and family. Thank you for your continuing service to the citizens of our county. Tim Murphy Lafayette, CA 94549 From: Pete Culver Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 8:25 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Diablo Glen Support Dear Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors- We are hopeful of moving to Walnut Creek and Diablo Glen when/if construction is allowed to proceed. It appears that the Planning Commission hearing was a one-sided exercise in NIMBY. The findings of the EIR seem largely to have been ignored. If that document had been highlighted at the Planning Commission meeting, the NIMBY folks would not have had a leg to stand on. The EIR states that, if the property is to change usage, the development of a CCRC such as Diablo Glen causes far fewer disruptions to the community than most other alternate uses. Plus, it increases the tax base far more than most other uses, especially compared to if the school owned the property. If you are going to ignore the findings of the EIR, why bother to have an EIR developed in the first place? Because it is required. Why? The findings are there to guide decision-makers in reaching informed decisions, free, as much as possible, from vested interests. Granted, we have a vested interest, but ours is supported by the EIR. Thank you for your consideration. J P Culver and Kathryn E Johnson From: SUSAN CARDWELL Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 8:23 AM To: Karen Mitchoff <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: John Gioia <johngioia@bos.cccounty.us>; Candace Andersen <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; Diane Burgis <supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us>; Federal Glover <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: Support for Diablo Glen in Walnut Creek Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, We strongly urge you to support the Spieker project at Diablo Glen. We are 70 years old and have lived in the East Bay for more than 30 years. We would like to stay in this area in a community that supports independent living as long as possible, with the guarantee of long term care when necessary. There are many excellent CCRC’s in Southern California, Arizona, and Florida and other locations, but the choices are very limited in Northern California. The location of Diablo Glen will allow us to stay close to our friends, family, and medical support in the Bay Area. Life Care Communities such as Diablo Glen are a benefit to the community, and we support Spieker in their effort to provide a necessary service to make aging more enjoyable and comfortable. Best regards, Susan and Rich Cardwell From: Kimberly Finney Date: November 17, 2022 at 5:29:53 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Supporting Diablo Glen - YES! Dear Karen Mitchoff, We have been residents of Contra Costa County for over 30 years and love living here! Please vote YES for Diablo Glen !!! Diablo Glen as a Life plan community has all the key and critical aspects for my husband and I to live our retirement dream and removes the anxiety and panic of ‘what-if’ while aging. Having available continuous range of services as we age, and not burdening family, .. offers so much peace of mind. At Diablo Glen I feel we can be living and really thriving. Lets keep Contra Costa County as an attractive, caring community for all …including seniors - bring Diablo Glen to Walnut Creek! Respectfully, Kimberly and Larry Finney Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, We believe Diablo Glen to be all about families and how to best provide for senior members especially when assisted living, memory treatment and long term care are needed. The project will have a positive impact on the county with: employment opportunities, a wider tax base and the creation of an attractive new niche neighborhood to further enhance beautiful Walnut Creek. Please support the Diablo Glen venture for the betterment of all. Thank you! James D. & Marylou Bradley Lafayette, CA 94549 This is a request for a vote in favor of the Diablo Glen project. It will be a Life Care Plan A community. To me that is peace of mind. I would no longer have to worry about who was going to care for me as I advance in age. What a release of a major concern! Once admitted to Diablo Glen, residents will be taken care of until the end of their lives. There are very few Life Care communities in the Bay Area. The offer of lifetime care with no increase in cost when transitioning to a higher level of care is a valuable opportunity for senior citizens. Please vote in acceptance of Diablo Glen. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Rita Liston East Bay Resident Page Date Received Doc Dated From Description 1 11/18/2022 Tatum, James & Nancy email (support) 2 11/18/2022 Magill, Thomas email (support) 3 11/18/2022 Zarrella, Michael & Ruggeri, Linda email (support) 4 11/18/2022 Nishihara, David & Carol email (support) 5 11/18/2022 Wallace, Jane & Bob email (support) 6 11/18/2022 Dow, Wanda email (support) 7 11/19/2022 Lieber, Bill email (support) 8 11/19/2022 Ubben, Ned & Miriam email (support) 9 11/20/2022 Kornbluth, Judith email (support) 10 11/21/2022 Delaplane, Linda email (support) 11 11/21/2022 Read, Greg & Mary Beth email (support) 12 11/21/2022 Mendez, Ramon & Ana email (support) 13 11/21/2022 Woo, Winnie email (support) 14 11/21/2022 Polgar, Susan & Leslie email (support) 15 11/21/2022 Englert, Vicki email (support) From: James Tatum Date: Thu, Nov 17, 2022, 1:16 PM Subject: Support Diablo Glen Application To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Karen, we really believe that the Diablo Glen project needs to be approved. New developments for senior housing and care are vital not just for Walnut Creek, but for the whole County. Thank you. Jim and Nancy From: Tom Magill Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 2:14 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: I support Diablo Glen Senior housing project Supervisors, I am a 28 resident of Walnut Creek (75 years old) and I support the planned new development of Diablo Glen in Walnut Creek. There is a shortage of housing in all categories, senior communities included. This helps fill the gap. The developer has a long history of delivering and maintaining wonderful Continuing Care Communities. I have visited one of there other properties over the years and found them wonderful. While touring residents have gone out of their way to tell us how much they love the place. I don't want to leave my dear city of Walnut Creek. I have friends and relatives nearby. If this community is not built we would likely have to move out of town as the Villas units are particularly attractive to us. Please Approve the development of Diablo Glen! Tom Magill Walnut Creek From: Michael Zarrella Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 3:39 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support of Diablo Glen Retirement Community Attn: Karen Mitchoff; Attn: Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, Although we are not Contra Costa County residents, we would very much like to be. My wife and I are looking at Continuing Care Residential Communities in the Bay Area. We have seen what the proposed Diablo Glen project has to offer, and as seniors,we would benefit greatly. We have read the FEIR report, and reviewed the design plans for the housing units. We believe this project will be a welcome addition to your community, with little, to no negative impact. The proposed retirement community includes plans to plant over 1,000 new trees. While it is true that trees (including many non-native and highly combustible eucalyptus trees) are being removed to facilitate the project’s construction, the project was designed around 81 protected and preserved trees, including all of the major valley oaks. Diablo Glen would give us the opportunity to downsize, provide us with high quality care, home maintenance, restaurants and fitness amenities. It will allow us to remain in the vibrant Bay Area we live in and love. Please consider approving the Diablo Glen project. Thank you for taking the time to read our email. Michael Zarrella & Linda Ruggeri Emerald Hills, CA 94062 From: DAVID NISHIHARA Subject: SUPPORT Diablo Glen Retirement Community Date: November 18, 2022 at 1:27:58 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Dear Ms. Mitchoff, I am writing you today to encourage a “YES” vote in support of the proposed Diablo Glen Retirement Community in Walnut Creek. My husband and I are retired senior citizens who have lived in and loved our Bay Area home for 50 years. We are now looking for a senior community in the Bay Area and the proposed Diablo Glen full-service retirement plan, CCRC Community in Walnut Creek is everything we have been looking for. Beautiful location and community plan Proven successful, experienced CCRC operation Certainly a positive addition to the City of Walnut Creek Thank you for your “yes” vote. David and Carol Nishihara As soon as we heard about Diablo Glen, we knew this would be the perfect place for us to continue the next phase of our lives and repeat the experience we have had living in Trilogy, an over-55 development, in Brentwood. In these days when the large population of baby boomers are thinking of where best to spend their final years, there are precious few places that offer complete care from independent living through memory care, if needed. Diablo Glen appears to fit that mold with a bonus of being situated near a renown medical facility, a large community park and a vibrant city. Diablo Glen will be tucked away in a quiet corner of Walnut Creek but still close enough for us to contribute to the Bay Area economy through shopping, entertainment, and sports venues. We envision forming golf groups, bocce and pickleball clubs, card groups, etc. to produce an active community with our independent living neighbors. We sincerely encourage you to vote in favor of Diablo Glen and give us that opportunity. Jane and Bob Wallace Brentwood, CA From: Wanda Dow Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 5:25 PM To: 'supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.u' <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.u> Cc: 'supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us' <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>; 'John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us' <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>; 'supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us' <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>; 'district5@bos.cccounty.us' <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: Diablo Glen Dispositor To Karen Mitchoff, the Contra Costa County District IV Supervisor Please approve Diablo Glen continuing life development. I believe that there is a large demand by the Walnut Creek retirement community to have a place to live where there are three levels of support. This will allow us to live in independent living until we might need more support. My parents lived in Paradise Valley in Fairfield and one of the more important benefits for our family was that my father could continue to live in independent living while my mother was in temporary skilled nursing allowing him to visit her with just a short walk to her skilled nursing home. Please approve the development Sincerely Wanda Dow Walnut Creek Retired Resident From: Bill Lieber Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 4:47 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us; John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support for Diablo Glen We are writing to express our support for your approval of this project. There are options for senior living in the area - but this is unique as it is a continuing care community and includes an on site availability of multiple levels of care. Along with an acknowledged general lack of housing, this specific type of facility is hard to find. Having this new (pretty much self-contained) project will help alleviate this situation and will benefit the area. We request your approval so the next phase can begin. Bill Lieber Danville From: NED UBBEN Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 7:03 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support for Diablo Glen Project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff; We are writing to urge your support for the Diablo Glen senior housing an care project. There is a clear need for more quality senior living facilities, especially ones that offer on-campus continuity of care. We believe this project will be an asset to it's neighbors and the community. We are active senior citizens who hope to live at Diablo Glen. Please vote to approve Diablo Glen. Sincerely, Ned & Miriam Ubben From: Judy Kornbluth Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2022 4:24 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us; John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Diablo Glen Life Plan Community Dear Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, I was so excited when I learned that the Diablo Glen Life Plan Community was to be built in Walnut Creek. As a healthy, adult, nearing the age of eighty (80), I have been searching for an environment which meets my personal, philosophical and medical/health needs ( which are minimal at this time). The Spieker Senior Communities offer independence, as well as, assistance for the ever-growing needs of the aging senior population. Having access to skilled nursing onsite is a bonus, for if and when it is needed. Contra Costa County and specifically Walnut Creek are very familiar to me. In 1973, I moved to Masters Ct, just off Marchbanks and immediately felt at home. I later was offered a nursing position at John Muir Medical Center and have remained in this county until the present time. Spieker has the senior population in mind when they developed their communities. My ideal apartment would be a one bedroom with den and 1 ½ baths, which have been available at other Spieker properties., but not easily found elsewhere. The fundamental importance of physical well-being and an environment that is mentally stimulating is necessary for all individuals, especially seniors. Interaction with other people, whether at mealtime or social and intellectual situations is vital to maintaining a healthy attitude. It is my hope that ALL of this will be accomplished at the Diablo Glen Life Plan Community. Sincerely, Judy Kornbluth Retired Registered Nurse, Medical Case Manager From: LINDA DELAPLANE Subject: Project Support for Diablo Glen Date: November 21, 2022 at 2:38:56 PM PST To: supervisosrmitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Dear Supervisors: According to the New York Times, 26% of young families, first time home buyers, are unable to find homes to buy, because older people are staying in their outgrown homes. As we baby boomers march into old age in legion numbers, we need places to go, places that will be as well-built and well-managed as Diablo Glen will be. It will be a Rolls-Royce of senior living communities, an enhancement to Walnut Creek even as it offers a life solution to local seniors who want to stay in this area. My husband and I have lived here for thirty-one years and consider this area to be as close to perfect as anyone could find. We don’t want to have to move away in order to down-size with a care option as we need to do. Please approve this much needed housing solution. Yours truly, Linda Delaplane ============================== Linda Delaplane Lafayette, CA 94549 From: GREGORY READ To: "supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us" <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us>, "JohnGioia@bos.cccounty.us" <JohnGioia@bos.cccounty.us>, "supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us" <supervisoranderson@bos.cccounty.us>, "supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us" <supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us>, "district5@bos.cccounty.us" <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Date: 11/21/2022 10:38 AM Subject: Please Approve Diablo Glen Project Dear Ms. Mitchoff, We write to provide our input regarding approval of the proposed D iablo Glen project in Walnut Creek. My wife and I are 78 and 80 years old respectively. We have lived in Orinda since 1971 and are now giving serious consideration to the "next chapter" of our lives. We were delighted to learn about the Diablo Glenn project and are on its list of future residents. We believe that the Diablo Glen project provides the best option in Contra Costa County for active seniors who are looking for a community to live out their final years. As you know, it is a Type A Life Plan Community, which provides all three types of long-term care (assisted living, memory care, and long-term care in a skilled nursing center.) The fact that it contains both individual "villas" (houses) and condominium-type apartments, as well as restaurants, work-out facilities, swimming pool, and easy/immediate access to medical care, makes it a very unusual and appealing option for seniors in the East Bay. While we recognize and understand many of the concerns of neighbors in the area, we believe these concerns can be resolved in large measure by the mitigation measures discussed by the developer and county staff. We believe that Contra Costa County, our home for more than fift y years, needs to provide well-designed living projects with memory and nursing care for its seniors. Many of our friends in Orinda are on the waiting list for this project, and we have signed up because we believe it provides the best option for us to live out our remaining years. We believe that the extraordinary benefits of this project for the entire County far outweigh any of the concerns expressed by those opposed. We strongly urge the Board of Supervisors to approve this project. Thank you for providing us the opportunity to provide our thoughts. Greg and Mary Beth Read Orinda, CA From: Ramon Mendez Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 9:10 AM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: Support for Diablo Glen Ladies and gentlemen, My wife Ana and I, Ramon Mendez, currently living in Texas want to let you know our support for the development and construction of the Diablo Glen community in your county. We are both in our eighties and as we age we want to move and live close to our daughter Ana who has been a resident of your county for over 25 years. She and her family currently live in Pleasant Hill and a move to the future Diablo Glen community will be an ideal place for us to spend our final years close to them. In addition to its development as a beautiful continuing care community we believe Diablo Glen will bring other financial and community benefits to the city of Walnut Creek and the Contra Costa county. Sincerely, Ramon and Ana Mendez From: winnie woo Date: Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:44 PM Subject: Diablo Glen project To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us>, <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Dear Supervisors I am writing in support of the Diablo Glen Project, A well written EIR as well as responsive mitigation measures are all depicted in the final EIR I have no idea why the Planning Commission did not vote to endorse that well planned and needed project in their hearing Please see the email I sent the planning commission in support of this and please let me know what I'm missing that caused the planning commission for not having supporting that project Respectively Wallace Woo, Contra \Costa Planning Commissioner in the late 80's and early 90's The following is the email I wrote the planning Commission in support of this project Winnie Woo Wed, Oct 19, 3:11 PM to planninghearing Dear Contra Costa Planning Commissioners, My name is Wallace Woo. I am a past Planning Commissioner of Contra Costa in the late eighties and early nineties until we moved to Oakland in 1994 I’m a retiree of the Federal EPA with 41 years in the EPA One of my divisions duties while with the EPA was to review and comment on EIS’s, the equivalent of EIRs for federal projects My review of the Diablo Glen EIR shows that it is a very well written document covering all the required regulatory and legal bases for an EIR Not only is the document well developed and written but the Diablo Glen Continuing Care Retirement Community project is one that is dearly needed in the county as the general populations longevity continue to grow Furthermore the environmental impacts associated with this project is cons iderably less then that of any of the alternative projects that could be located there Because of all those reasons I strongly urge you to approve the Diablo Glen CCRC Respectfully Wallace Woo Dear Supervisor Mitchoff (with copies to the other supervisors), We are looking forward to the opportunity to live for the rest of our lives in Walnut Creek, particularly in a gracious residence like Diablo Glen, where we can have continuing care, if we n eed it. We have been residents of Lafayette for almost 28 years; we love this region; we have woven strong community here, and we want to stay. Your support of developing Diablo Glen will help fill an major gap for seniors, including some who have limited income. No matter what is built on the existing property, there will be impacts on the neighborhood, but a CCR community will have major advantages over single-family homes (shorter build- out time, less vehicle traffic -- and a community of potential volunteers for schools and other non-profits). We are excited about Diablo Glen, and impressed by the management team. We urge your support. Thank you, Les and Sue Polgar Dr. Leslie G. Polgar Mrs. Susan C. Polgar Lafayette, CA 94549 My name is Vicki Englert. My husband, Joe, and I resided in Lafayette for many years. We raised our three sons on Los Arabis Dr. Our boys attended Vallecito, Happy Valley, Stanley and Acalanes and received fine educations at these terrific public schools. All five of us were deeply involved in the community. Joe and I served on various City boards and our sons were active in swimming, water polo, football and soccer. I was a LAMORINDA residential realtor for 16 years and Joe commuted to San Francisco where he practiced law. After raising our sons we retired, sold our home and moved to a condo in Tiburon where we have enjoyed a leisurely lifestyle since. I have so many long-time local friends who are planning on moving to Diablo Glen My only regret is that it is taking so long to complete the project. Most of us are ready to move in yesterday. My husband, Joe, died last year after a long illness. I am THRILLED to be on the Wait List of this amazing new project in Walnut Creek that I hope, and trust, you will be approving today. To move back to Contra Costa County will feel like ‘going home’ again. I would also like you to know that I have several friends who reside at Stoneridge Creek, the retirement community that Spieker Senior Continuing Care Community completed several years ago in Pleasanton. To a person, each one of them can’t believe how fortunate they are to live in such an upscale, gorgeous place. They joke it is “one step away from heaven.” Please see fit to approve all changes today. We Seniors are ready, willing and able to add even more good things to Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County. Just wait until you experience what amazing Volunteers we can be! You won’t be sorry for welcoming us. Respectfully, Vicki Englert Page Date Received Doc Dated From Description 1 11/21/2022 Cookson, Bob email (support) 2 11/21/2022 Osborn, Lorraine email (support) 3 11/22/2022 Barbee, Michael email (support) 4 11/22/2022 Mears, Judith email (support) 5 11/22/2022 Johnston, Robert email (support) 6 11/22/2022 Carle, Catherine & William email (support) 7 11/23/2022 Liao, Cheng email (support) 8 11/23/2022 Egan, Lewis & Maury email (support) From: Bob Cookson Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 2:47 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorburgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us; bobccookson@gmail.com; 'Colleen Cookson' Subject: I Support the Diablo Glen project Dear Supervisor Mitchoff Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the Diablo Glen project. With full disclosure, my wife and I intend to move into the project when and if it is completed. Both of our parents have lived in senior residential communities and we have observed their benefits for both the seniors and their families. In our case, Diablo Glen offers a level of support and services that we could not afford if we were living at home. Additionally it allows us to live near our children and grandchildren in a safe and healthy environment. Aside from our own personal benefits from the project there are a number of community benefits that would be gained. 1. Initially zoned for 160 medium density homes, the Diablo Glen project will be a much more effective and environmentally sensitive use of the property. I believe that is why the property’s owners chose Diablo Glen for the property’s development. 2. Diablo Glen brings a very positive economic benefit to the community both in terms of additions to the property tax base and job creations. 3. Diablo Glen and its residents will be less impactful on the community’s infrastructure ( roads and schools) than single family housing. 4. Senior residences make good neighbors. They are quiet communities and they are respectful of the neighbors and their neighbors’ property. They are good stewards of their own property. Many seniors use their retirement time to volunteer in their communities. 5. Diablo Glen adds to the housing inventory in a critically needed demographic sector. The number of seniors (80 years and older) is expected to triple in the next 30 years (National Institute of Heath). Additional senior housing will be need to meet this growth. Again thank you for this opportunity to express my support for Diablo Glen. I would urge you and your fellow supervisors to approve this needed, responsible and beneficial project. Respectfully, Bob Cookson From: Lorraine Osborn Date: Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 8:22 AM Subject: Please support Diablo Glen! To: <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Good morning, Supervisor Mitchoff, I am asking for your support and that of the other county supervisors to approve the permit to build the Diablo Glen retirement community. I am one of many seniors who want the peace of mind to move into a place where I will be able to stay for the rest of my life. I have been looking for a retirement community that provides independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing, all in the same facility. There are NO others in Contra Costa County. Diablo Glen promises to be a beautiful community that preserves natural features as well as adding to the economic well being of Contra Costa County. Please vote in support of Diablo Glen! Thank you. Sincerely, Lorraine Osborn Martinez, CA 94553 From: Michael Barbee Subject: Support for the Spieker Senior Project Date: November 22, 2022 at 5:06:13 PM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I am writing today in support of the Spieker Senior Project. I want to provide a bit of our family background, and the reasons why my wife and I support this project. My wife was born and raised in Walnut Creek. I moved with my parents to Walnut Creek when I was entering high school. After college, my wife worked for a real estate management firm in Lafayette, and a construction firm in Concord. I worked for two civil engineering firms in Walnut Creek at the start of my career. Ultimately, with two partners, I founded a civil engineering firm in 1989 with our office located in Bishop Ranch, San Ramon. Though my partners and I have all retired, the firm is still thriving and has designed and processed many projects in Contra Costa County. Now, my wife and I are at the stage where we are considering retirement communities in which to live. We have considered Rossmoor, but we are uncomfortable because the vast majority of housing options in Rossmoor are constructed as multiple level living units. We desire a single level home for mobility and safety reasons. All residential units of the Spieker Senior Project will be single level. The main draw for us is the assisted living / memory care facility that will be located right on campus. To give you some background, both of our mothers needed to move to assisted living facilities prior to passing away. There were no assisted living facilities located within 5 miles of our parents’ homes in which they had lived for decades. Our fathers, at advanced ages, needed to drive on I-680 to go visit their spouses. Needless to say, this was a nerve wracking experience. The assisted living facility at the Spieker Senior Project will be within walking distance of our residence. It is my understanding that the subject property is zoned as medium density residential; it is not considered Open Space. My wife and I still drive, but nowhere near as much as we used to with commutes, school drop off / pick up, youth sports etc. The proposed project is also going to provide a shuttle service, which we would utilize, to various points in Walnut Creek, such as Broadway Shopping Center, BART, the Lesher Theater, etc. The Spieker Senior Project should have substantially less traffic impact on the neighboring community than a traditional medium density residential community. For these reasons, from a personal point of view, we are looking forward to being a part of the Spieker Community when it is open for new residents. From a regional point of view, it is well known that the entire Bay Area suffers from a shortage of housing, both affordable and market rate, which has led to unsustainably high real estate prices. This is constantly in the news, and is considered the number one problem by many Bay Area residents. If and when this project is approved and built, my wife and myself, along with the other 350 residents, will sell our current homes, making them available for the next generation of families to occupy. This will not solve the Bay Area housing crisis, but it will make a positive contribution. For all of these reasons, I support the Spieker Senior Project, and I am hoping that the Board of Supervisors will approve the project. Sincerely, Michael P. Barbee From: Judith Mears Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 5:39 PM Subject: PLEASE APPROVE DIABLO GLEN PROJECT in Walnut Creek To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Dear Supervisor Mitchoff -- I am a Pre-Construction Depositor at Diablo Glen, and I am writing to urge you and your colleagues to approve Diablo Glen's application currently before the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. I have been a resident of Walnut Creek for more than 30 years, during which time I have owned my own home. My domestic partner and I live in a home that was built in 1966 and that has 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, and a significantly-sized "bonus room". We have a backyard with fruit trees, shrubs and roses, and a view of Mt. Diablo. If we are able to move into Diablo Glen, our home will be available for sale to a younger family with children, eager to take advantage of our home's domestic and outdoor space, the community amenities, and the excellent school system. My partner and I are both retired lawyers. I have been a volunteer and donor for many years for the Walnut Creek-based Meals on Wheels Diablo Region. I am also a Contra Costa County HICAP Volunteer Medicare Counselor, registered with the State of California, providing advice and counsel to people who have, or who are eligible to have, Medicare. ("HICAP" stands for Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program. The office is located in Pleasant Hill.) Through my volunteer activities and interactions with people I help, I understand how fortunate I am to be able to own my own home when so many cannot. I want to continue to live in this community and serve this community. My partner and I are both 76 years old. If Diablo Glen is approved and built, I expect we will be almost 80 years old by the time we can move in. Our house is 55 years old, and as it and we age, the demands for maintenance and repair will likely increase in both complexity and expense. At age 80, I know I would be very relieved not to have any further maintenance worries regarding my domicile. This is especially true in an environment when earthquakes and wildfires can cause expensive damage and leave the house inhabitable for weeks or months until repairs are completed. Also, at age 80, it is reasonable to assume that we may need access to the type of medical care that seniors use most. We are long-time Kaiser members, and we expect to continue to be. Living at Diablo Glen won't interfere with that membership. But neither Kaiser nor Medicare cover long term care or memory care, both of which will be available (and included, at no extra charge) at Diablo Glen. No other senior facility in this area is a comprehensive life plan community, the way Stoneridge Creek is in Pleasanton and as Diablo Glen will be. In an era when long term care insurance is either unaffordable or unavailable, the availability of long term care services at Diablo Glen gives me great peace of mind. I understand that the land in question is already zoned residential, and the alternative to Diablo Glen is a plot of some 60 single family homes. Considering that Diablo Glen will house more than 100 households (presumably leaving a comparable number of local single family homes available for purchase), Diablo Glen seems to be the better option in terms of increasing housing supply. The Diablo Glen project is, in my opinion, the best possible residential use of that land. I urge you and your fellow Supervisors to approve this valuable project and bring it to life as soon as possible. Sincerely, Judith Mears Judith Mears Walnut Creek, CA 94598 November 22, 2022 To: Karen Mitchoff, Contra Costa County District IV Supervisor and copies to Supervisors John Gioia, Candace Anderson, Diane Burgis and Federal Glover. From: Robert and Terry Johnston. Diablo Glen depositors and residents of Walnut Creek We moved to California after college in 1963 and I started my career in Public Accounting with a firm in Walnut Creek. Three years later we bought our first home on Los Felicas Avenune in Walnut Creek which is in Rancho San Miguel across from Heather Farms Park and very close to the Diablo Glen project. We moved to Via Verde in Walnut Creek eight years later and are still living in that home. So, we have lived in Ygnacio Valley in WC for 56 years. I have been very active in Walnut Creek as a CPA and Terry and I have been very involved in various organizations in Walnut Creek and the East Bay. I was also Treasurer in Dick Hildebrand’s campaign for WC City Council and the early campaigns for Richard Rainey. Terry has been a teacher in the Mt. Diablo system and she also spent years working in human resources. We love Walnut Creek and California. We are very pleased that Spieker Properties have identified a wonderful property right in Ygnacio Valley close to where we have lived for so long and close to our three children and two grandchildren. Also, close to our doctors, other health care providers, John Muir hospital and ER and JM Urgent Care not to mention friends for almost a life time. This project will contain 354 Independent living units and a health care center for 100 residents as well as a memory care unit. We feel a sense of well being knowing that whatever type of housing we need will be available to each of us at Diablo Glen. Since almost all of the current depositors are from the Bay Area that means that close to 354 homes in the Bay Area will be available to others as the owners will sell their homes as they move to Diablo Glenn. It is not a secret that California and the Bay Area especially, needs more housing. We believe this project fills a big need in our community and is beneficial in so many different ways including providing employment for over 200 people. Thank you for your positive consideration of this project. Robert and Terry Johnston Walnut Creek, CA From: Catherine Carle Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:48 AM Subject: Support for Diablo Glen Project To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us <supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Cc: <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>, district5@bos.cccounty.us <district5@bos.cccounty.us> Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I am writing in favor of moving forward with the Diablo Glen Project. We moved to Walnut Creek in 1975, purchasing the home we live in still. After 47 years here, we are deeply invested in the community we are part of. We have been involved in the schools, recreational sports, scouting, bond and parcel tax campaigns, and since retirement, have continued to be involved through volunteering at various agencies and organizations. Additionally, many of us provide care for our grandchildren who also live locally, providing much needed support. As seniors, we have a wealth of experience and the time to share it with others at different life stages. Walnut Creek needs to have a vibrant mix of residents, from young to old, to continue to be the thriving, inclusive city it is. Both of our parents moved to Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC), one in Fairfield CA and one in Charlotte NC, so we can attest to the benefit these communities offer not only to the seniors residing there, but to their families who take on the responsibility of caring for them at some point. Those of us who are in support of Diablo Glen are looking forward to putting our homes on the market, making them available to young families, and moving to a community such as Diablo Glen that provides independence in the short term with long term care, as needed. Growth is challenging, change can be hard to accept; anyone who has lived in this area as long as we have can agree on that. But I am always thankful that I live in Walnut Creek, a city that has made decisions to meet the needs of a diverse population. I would encourage the Board of Supervisors to weigh heavily the overall benefit Diablo Glen can provide to the larger community of Walnut Creek by keeping an engaged senior population as residents. Thank you for your consideration- Catherine and William Carle From: Cheng Liao Subject: Why I strongly support Diablo Glen CCRC Date: November 23, 2022 at 9:38:58 AM PST To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us, supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us, supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us, district5@bos.cccounty.us Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, My name is Cheng L Liao. As formal president and longtime board member of CAPA (Chinese American Political Association), I’m proud to say that I’ve met 4 of the 5 Supervisors (except Supervisor Burgis) and many other elected officials at various local, county, and state functions. We thank your hard work in making our county such a great place to live. My wife and I have lived in this county for 44 years! We’ve worked here, grown our family here, and involved in community service and developed community friends here. In fact, many of our CAPA and community friends become depositors of the Diablo Glen CCRC Project. As of today, 1500 people have made deposit and are supporting Diablo Glen. The reason? We LOVE our lives here, and we want to RETIRE LOCALLY, here!! I received my Ph.D. degree from UCLA in the field of Biochemistry-Toxicology. I then post-doc 2 years at UC Berkeley and 2 years at UC San Francisco, before joining California EPA as Staff Toxicologist. For nearly 30 years at CalEPA, one of my major responsibilities was reviewing and approving human health and ecological risk assessment as part of the EIR submitted by industrial companies and facilities. Several years after my retirement from CalEPA, I applied, interviewed by you and Supervisor Andersen, and honored to be selected as Public Member of CC County’s Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Advisory Committee. I served in 2013 and 2014. I’ve read Diablo Glen's EIR; I found the document to be well written and has covered fully all the required elements. At the Oct 26 virtual meeting, I found some of the planning commissioners were confused by the technical aspects of the EIR. Some opposing the Diablo Glen project cited traffic as a problem. They must have forgotten that this is to be a retirement community; as such, it would produce far less car traffic as compared to a regular residential development. Thus, Dear Supervisor Mitchoff, I’m here to urge you and your fellow Supervisors to approve the Diablo Glen CCRC project near John Muir Hospital. Thank you very much! Respectfully, Cheng L Liao Moraga, CA 94556 From: L.T. Egan Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 12:48 PM To: supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us Cc: John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us; supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us; supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us; district5@bos.cccounty.us Subject: SUPPORT FOR APPROVAL OF DIABLO GLEN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY Dear Ms. Mitchoff My husband and I are writing in support of the Diablo Glen Retirement Community that is up for approval before you and your fellow CCC Supervisors on Tuesday, November 29th. We would be appearing in person to show our whole-hearted support. However, as is too often the case of retirees, we have conflicting and long-standing difficult-to-schedule medical procedures on that day. Nevertheless, we believe it is very important to stress to you and the Board the importance of approving this long sought and desired project. My husband and I are 22 year residents of Contra Costa County, currently residing in Walnut Creek. Our doctors and dentists are here; our friends are here; our church is here; our history is here. As we grow older, our needs are changing. We have been actively looking at CCC communities outside California and the Bay Area, having found nothing that seems to meet our needs in this local area. If we must move away from our current support system, we might as well move out of state where the cost of living is far, far lower and more friendly to retirees. It makes no sense for us to "reinvent the wheel" in this state, unless we are able to stay in our immediate area which has been home to us for almost a quarter of a century. The Diablo Glen project is the answer to our needs: it will allow us to stay in a community that we know and love. Moreover, it will add to the stock of retirement facilities CCC will find more and more important as the years go by and the population ages. In the strongest terms, we urge you to approve the Diablo Glen Community project. We have found the Streiker Organization to be very competent, thoughtful and to have the needs of seniors in mind. Your approval will be a win-win-win for everyone. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, L.ewis Egan Maury Egan RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on Ordinance No. 2022-27, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2022-27, an urgency ordinance extending a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of fulfillment centers, parcel hubs, and parcel sorting facilities in the North Richmond area through November 29, 2023. 3. DETERMINE that adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-27 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). 4. DIRECT staff to file a CEQA Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk-Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2022-06, an urgency interim ordinance that established a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of fulfillment centers, parcel hubs and parcel sorting facilities (collectively and individually, "Heavy Distribution") in the unincorporated North Richmond area. This urgency ordinance, Ordinance No. 2022-27, extends the temporary moratorium on Heavy Distribution uses to November 29, 2023, while the County continues developing reasonable regulations to mitigate the impacts for such uses. The issue stems from rapid expansion of e-commerce in recent years and need for local fulfillment centers and operations. The North Richmond area particularly has seen a proliferation of these types of uses. As a result, the North Richmond area faces increased truck traffic and the following related adverse impacts: increased safety risk to smaller vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists; increased damage to streets; and traffic congestion and reduced levels of service on streets and at intersections; and increased emissions and air quality impacts. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Francisco Avila, 925-655-2866 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Consider Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-27 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Staff has identified additional concerns that the cumulative impacts caused by the increase in Heavy Distribution in the North Richmond Area have not been sufficiently considered and analyzed given that Heavy Distribution often operates on a 24-hour basis and may cause deteriorating air quality, health, noise, vibration, and other disruptions to peace and quiet that may impact surrounding sensitive uses, such as schools and residences. The North Richmond community has been designated by the California Air Resources Board and Bay Area Air Quality Management District as one of only 15 communities in California to be part of State Assembly Bill (AB) 617's Community Air Protection Program. Under current County regulations, Heavy Distribution is consistent with the existing General Plan industrial land use designations in the North Richmond Area, and is permitted within the North Richmond P-1 district. DCD staff is considering a zoning text amendment to the North Richmond P-1 district to address the individual and cumulative impacts of Heavy Distribution through appropriate locational criteria and traffic and air quality impact mitigation requirements. Extending this temporary moratorium on Heavy Distribution uses will allow staff an opportunity to consider a zoning text amendment to the North Richmond P-1 District that takes into account these issues. A threat to the public health, safety, and welfare would result if Heavy Distribution type land-use entitlements or building permits are accepted and approved under the existing North Richmond P-1 District. The failure to extend this temporary moratorium may result in significant irreversible impacts to businesses, residents, and other sensitive uses in the North Richmond Area that may not be adequately analyzed or mitigated. CEQA COMPLIANCE Adoption of the proposed urgency interim ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed ordinance would extend a temporary moratorium on the establishment or expansion of a land use activity that might otherwise affect the environment. See CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The failure to extend the moratorium may result in significant irreversible impacts to businesses, residents, and other sensitive uses in the North Richmond Area from new or expanded Heavy Distribution land uses. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speaker: No name given. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS North Richmond Urgency Ordinance re Heavy Distribution-second extension MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Ordinance No. 2022-27 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-27 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-27 URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON HEAVY DISTRIBUTION LAND USE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTH RICHMOND AREA The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows: SECTION I. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. A. The purpose of this urgency ordinance is to extend a temporary moratorium on the establishment or expansion of fulfillment centers, parcel hubs, and parcel sorting facilities in the North Richmond Area while the County considers developing reasonable regulations to address the individual and cumulative impacts caused by those uses. B. The area of North Richmond is the area located within the boundaries of the North Richmond P-1 (Planned Unit) District adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 12, 1994 (the “North Richmond Area”). The North Richmond P-1 District encompasses the entire North Richmond community. C. The North Richmond Area is designated in the County General Plan primarily for heavy industrial and light industrial land uses, but also includes areas designated for residential and public space land uses. Existing industrial land uses in the North Richmond Area consist of floricultural growing operations, distribution operations, recycling and auto dismantling operations, a resource recovery facility, and a water reclamation facility. D. The North Richmond Area also includes an elementary school, single- and multi-family dwellings, parks and recreation, open space, and an urban farm outdoor education center for at-risk youth. Many of these uses are adjacent to or located near the industrial land uses in the North Richmond Area. E. Due to the recent and rapid expansion of e-commerce in recent years and need for local fulfillment centers and operations, the North Richmond Area has seen a significant increase in fulfillment centers, parcel hubs, and parcel sorting facilities (collectively and individually, “Heavy Distribution”). A “fulfillment center” is a facility where the primary purpose is storage and distribution of e-commerce products to consumers or end- users, either directly or through a parcel hub. A “parcel hub” is a last mile facility or similar facility where the primary purpose is the processing or redistribution of parcels or products, primarily by moving a shipment from one mode of transport to a vehicle with a rated capacity of less than 10,000 pounds, for delivery directly to consumers or end-users. A “parcel sorting facility” is a facility where the primary purpose is the sorting or redistribution of parcels or products from a fulfillment center to a parcel hub. F. With this increase in Heavy Distribution, residents and businesses within the North Richmond Area face increased truck traffic and the following related adverse impacts: increased safety risk to smaller vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists; increased damage to streets; traffic congestion and reduced levels of service on streets and at intersections; and increased emissions and air quality impacts. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-27 2 G. The Board of Supervisors has additional concerns that the cumulative impacts caused by the increase in Heavy Distribution in the North Richmond Area have not been sufficiently considered and analyzed given that Heavy Distribution often operates on a 24-hour basis and may cause deteriorating air quality, health, noise, vibration, and other disruptions to peace and quiet that may impact surrounding sensitive uses, such as schools and residences. As with current industrial uses located in the North Richmond Area, new or expanded Heavy Distribution uses may be located adjacent to or near sensitive uses, such as schools and residences. H. The North Richmond community has been designated by the California Air Resources Board and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District as one of only 15 communities in California to be part of State Assembly Bill (AB) 617’s Community Air Protection Program. The purpose of this program is to reduce emissions exposure in California’s communities that are most impacted by air pollution. A community steering committee has been established to guide the development of a Community Emissions Reduction Program to improve air quality in North Richmond, Richmond, and San Pablo. The current proliferation of Heavy Distribution uses in the North Richmond Area without appropriate evaluation is inconsistent with AB617’s goal of reducing harmful particulate matter emissions in the State’s most heavily impacted communities. I. The Board of Supervisors has determined that Heavy Distribution has potentially detrimental impacts upon the North Richmond community that are not addressed by the County’s current General Plan and zoning regulations. Under these current regulations, Heavy Distribution is consistent with the existing General Plan industrial land use designations in the North Richmond Area and is permitted within the North Richmond P- 1 District. There is a need to study and develop policies to address various individual and cumulative impacts associated with Heavy Distribution. Specifically, there is a need for additional locational criteria and traffic and air quality impact mitigation requirements to protect businesses, residents, and other sensitive uses in the North Richmond Area. J. The Department of Conservation and Development is considering a zoning text amendment to the North Richmond P-1 District to address the individual and cumulative impacts of Heavy Distribution. K. On December 14, 2021, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2021-43, an urgency interim ordinance that established a moratorium on Heavy Distribution land use development in the North Richmond Area. On January 18, 2022, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2022-06, extending the moratorium for 10 months and 15 days. L. This ordinance, extending the moratorium for another year, is necessary to proceed with an orderly planning process that takes into account consideration of the zoning text amendment for the North Richmond P-1 District. A threat to the public health, safety, and welfare would result if Heavy Distribution land use entitlements or building permits are accepted and approved under the existing North Richmond P-1 District. If Heavy Distribution land uses are allowed in the North Richmond Area under the existing North Richmond P-1 District, they could conflict with and defeat the purpose of the ORDINANCE NO. 2022-27 3 contemplated zoning text amendment. The failure to extend the moratorium during the stated period may result in significant irreversible impacts to businesses, residents, and other sensitive uses in the North Richmond Area that would not be adequately analyzed or mitigated. SECTION II. EXTENSION. The existing moratorium established by Ordinance No. 2021-43, and extended by Ordinance No. 2022-06, is extended for one year, through November 29, 2023. SECTION III. PROHIBITION. The existing moratorium on certain development in the North Richmond Area is extended as follows: (a) While this interim ordinance is in effect, no new Heavy Distribution land use shall be established and no existing Heavy Distribution land use shall be expanded within the North Richmond Area, except as otherwise provided in Section IV. No applications for a land use entitlement or building permit for Heavy Distribution shall be accepted or processed, and no land use entitlement or building permit for Heavy Distribution shall be approved or issued, for any parcel or portion of a parcel located within the North Richmond Area. (b) This moratorium applies to the North Richmond Area, which is the area located within the boundaries of the North Richmond P-1 District, as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference. SECTION IV. EXEMPTIONS. The prohibition set forth in Section III does not apply to any application for a land use entitlement or building permit for Heavy Distribution that has been deemed complete by the Department of Conservation and Development as of December 14, 2021. SECTION V. REPORTS. In accordance with subdivision (d) of Government Code section 65858, ten days before the expiration of this ordinance and any extension of it, the Department of Conservation and Development shall file with the Clerk of this Board a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions that led to the adoption of this urgency interim ordinance. SECTION VI. SEVERABILITY. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or to be otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other ordinance provisions or clauses or applications thereof that can be implemented without the invalid provision or clause or application, and to this end the provisions and clauses of this ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION VII. DECLARATION OF URGENCY. This interim ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public safety, health, and welfare of the County, and it shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The facts constituting the urgency of this interim ordinance’s adoption are set forth in Section I. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-27 4 SECTION VIII. EFFECTIVE PERIOD. This ordinance becomes effective immediately upon passage by four-fifths vote of the Board of Supervisors and shall continue in effect for a period of one year, through November 29, 2023, pursuant to Government Code section 65858. SECTION IX. PUBLICATION. Within 15 days of passage, this ordinance shall be published once with the names of the supervisors voting for and against it in the East Bay Times, a newspaper published in this County. PASSED ON ___________________ by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONICA NINO ____________________________ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair and County Administrator By: ________________________ [SEAL] Deputy TLG: H:\2022\Conservation and Development\North Richmond Urgency Ordinance re Heavy Distribution - second extension.doc RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/386 ratify the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Starr Street, except for emergency traffic, on October 30, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First (1 st) Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Crockett Chamber of Commerce is seeking a road closure for the 1st Annual Oktoberfest Festival. This is a free event and will include live music, seating, and dancing space. Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will not have Board approval for completed road closure. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Ratify the prior decision to fully close 2nd Ave., between Ceres St. & Starr St. on October 30, 2022, Crockett area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/386 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/286 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/386 IN THE MATTER OF: Ratify the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Starr Street on October 30, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (District V) RC22-22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to Crockett Chamber of Commerce to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Starr Street, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, on October 30, 2022 for the period of 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured per traffic control plan reviewed by the Public Works Department. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. Crockett Chamber of Commerce shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/398 ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Hillgrade Avenue between Lunada Lane and Crest Avenue, on November 14, 2022 and November 15, 2022 from 8:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m., for the purpose of replacing a utility pole and installing a switch, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) has requested to close the road during construction for public safety due to the narrow road and blind corner at the construction site. Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will not have Board approval for completed road closure. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Ratify the prior decision to fully close a portion of Hillgrade Avenue, on November 14th & 15th, 2022 from 8:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m., Alamo area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/398 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/398 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/398 IN THE MATTER OF: Ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Hillgrade Avenue between Lunada Lane and Crest Avenue, on November 14, 2022 and November 15, 2022 from 8:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m., for the purpose of replacing a utility pole and installing a switch, Alamo area. (District II) RC22-27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) to fully close a portion of Hillgrade Avenue between Lunada Lane and Crest Avenue, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, on November 14, 2022 and November 15, 2022 for the period of 8:00 a.m. through 3:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via roads identified in a traffic control plan, reviewed by the Public Works Department. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. PG&E shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the San Pablo Dam Road and Bailey Road Signal Hardware Upgrades Project (Project) and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise the Project, Bay Point and El Sobrante areas. [County Project No. 0662-6R4139, DCD-CP#21-18] (Districts I, V) DETERMINE the Project is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to the Department of Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Project cost: $1,200,000. (92% Highway Safety Improvement Program, 8% Local Road Funds) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Shravan Sundaram, 925.313.2366 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the San Pablo Dam Road and Bailey Road Signal Hardware Upgrades Project and take related actions under CEQA BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County (County) Public Works Department proposes to upgrade signal hardware and signage at eleven priority locations described above to improve public safety by: 1) providing better advance visibility of intersection signals for drivers, 2) reducing red light violation frequency, 3) enhancing the pedestrian countdown signal, 4) discouraging jaywalking. The proposed improvements include: 1) replacing signal back plates, signal heads, mounts, street name signs, and controllers, 2) installing video detection cameras, 3) installing pedestrian countdown signal heads on existing poles. No right of way acquisitions or temporary construction easements, utility relocations, ground disturbance, or vegetation removal are anticipated. Temporary traffic controls are anticipated, and emergency vehicles will have full access. Appropriate best management practices for water pollution control (i.e., drainage inlet protection) will be implemented during construction. Installation of upgrades is anticipated to occur in spring/summer 2023 and will take approximately 40 working days. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CEQA clearance is a requirement for the state funded Highway Safety Improvement Program grant eligibility. If this clearance is not obtained, this project will not be eligible for funding and the needed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements will not be installed. ATTACHMENTS CEQA \\pw-data\grpdata\engsvc\ENVIRO\TransEng\San Pablo Dam Rd & Bailey Rd Signal Hardware Upgrades (WO4139)\CEQA\NOE\To DCD\CP#21-18 NOE SPDR & Bailey Rd Signal Upgrades.docx Revised 2018 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Notice of Exemption To: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 From: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 County Clerk, County of Contra Costa Project Title: San Pablo Dam Road and Bailey Road Signal Hardware Upgrades, Project #: WO4139, CP#: 21-18 Project Applicant: Contra Costa County Public Works Dept., 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez CA 94553 Main: (925) 313-2000, Contact: Shravan Sundaram, (925) 313-2366 Project Location: The project is located at nine intersections along San Pablo Dam Road in El Sobrante and two intersections along Bailey Road in Bay Point. The San Pablo Dam Road intersections are with El Portal Drive, Hillcrest Road, the Pitt Way mid -block crossing, Appian Way/La Colina Road, Milton Drive, Clark Road, May Road, Valley View Road, and Castro Ranch Road. The Bailey Road intersections are with Willow Pass Road and Canal Road/Delta De Anza Trail. Lead Agency: Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 Main: (925) 655-2705, Contact: Syd Sotoodeh (925) 655-2877 Project Description: Contra Costa County (County) Public Works Dept. proposes to upgrade signal hardware and signage at eleven priority locations described above to improve public safety by: • Providing better advance visibility of intersection signals for drivers • Reducing red light violation frequency • Enhancing the pedestrian countdown signal • Discouraging jaywalking The proposed improvements include: • Replacing signal back plates, signal heads, mounts, street name signs, and controllers • Installing video detection cameras • Installing pedestrian countdown signal heads on existing poles No right of way acquisitions or temporary construction easements, utility relocations, ground disturbance, or vegetation removal are anticipated. Temporary traffic controls are anticipated and emergency vehicles will have full access. Appropriate best management practices for water pollution control (i.e. drainage inlet protection) will be implemented during construction. Installation of upgrades is anticipated to occur in spring/summer 2023 and will take approximately 40 working days. Exempt Status: Ministerial Project (Sec. 21080[b][1]; 15268) Categorical Exemption (Sec. 15301[c]) Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080[b][3]; 15269[a]) General Rule of Applicability (Sec. 15061[b][3]) Emergency Project (Sec. 21080[b][4]; 15269[b][c]) Other Statutory Exemption (Sec. ) Reasons why project is exempt: The activity consists of upgrading existing traffic signal hardware and signage to improve public safety with no expansion of use, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA Guidelines. If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: Date: _____________ Title: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant 11/07/2022 Senior Planner \\pw-data\grpdata\engsvc\ENVIRO\TransEng\San Pablo Dam Rd & Bailey Rd Signal Hardware Upgrades (WO4139)\CEQA\NOE\To DCD\CP#21-18 NOE SPDR & Bailey Rd Signal Upgrades.docx Revised 2018 AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant Department of Fish and Wildlife Fees Due Public Works Department De Minimis Finding - $0 255 Glacier Drive County Clerk - $50 Martinez, CA 94553 Conservation and Development - $25 Attn: Shravan Sundaram Environmental Services Division Phone: 313-2366 Total Due: $75 Receipt #: Richmond AntiochConcord Oakley Danville Pittsbur g Hercules Lafayette Orinda Pinole San Ramon Walnut Creek Mar tinez Brentwood Mor aga Pleasant Hill ClaytonEl C er rito San Pablo . 0 2010Miles 255 GLACIER D RIVE MARTIN EZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX : (925) 313-2333 PROJECT VICINITY MAP - CONTRA COSTA COUNTYSan Pablo Dam Road and Bailey Road Signal Hardware Upgrades FEDERAL ID NO:DB: CB:DATE:MN OCT 2020 1 1Page of Project LocationSan Pablo Dam Road Project LocationBailey Road JV 255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 PROJECT VICINITY MAP - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY San Pablo Dam Rd and Bailey Rd Signal Hardware Upgrades FEDERAL ID NO:DB: CB:DATE:MN MAY 2021 1 1Sheet 1 of 2NW ± 0.5 0 0.50.25 Miles Intersection Signal Hardware Upgrades 255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 PROJECT VICINITY MAP - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY San Pablo Dam Rd and Bailey Rd Signal Hardware Upgrades FEDERAL ID NO:DB: CB:DATE:MN MAY 2021 1 1Sheet 2 of 2NW ± 0.15 0 0.150.075 Miles RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/392 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD13-09315, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Developer Fees. BACKGROUND: The public road improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for the warranty period following completion and acceptance of the improvements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and performance/maintenance surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., Commercial Insurance Company C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period for Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD13-09315, Danville area. CLERK'S ADDENDUM RELISTED to a future date uncertain. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/392 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/392 IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD13-09315, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District II) WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD13-09315 were completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Industries, Inc. and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director; The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period following completion and acceptance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to: REFUND the $21,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP 640802, dated September 12, 2013), plus interest to Shapell Industries, Inc. in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the subdivision agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the civil improvements for maintenance in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond, Bond No. 929 578 865, dated September 6, 2013, issued by The Continental Insurance Company, are EXONERATED. Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., Commercial Insurance Company RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/397 approving the Road Improvement Agreement, for land use permit LP16-02031, for a project being developed by CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Concord area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Improvements have been reviewed and processed by Public Works staff and meets all applicable conditions of approval and County requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Road Improvement Agreement will not be approved, and the developer will not be allowed to obtain building permits in accordance with the requirements of this land use permit. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Stanley Muroaka- DCD, CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approving the Road Improvement Agreement for land use permit LP16-02031, Concord area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/397 Road Improvement Agreement & Improvement Security Bond MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/397 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/397 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving the Road Improvement Agreement, for land use permit LP16-02031, for a project being developed by CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, Concord area. (District V) WHEREAS, these improvements are approximately located near Willow Pass Business Park along Evora Road. The following document was presented for Board approval for land use permit LP16-02031 property located in the Concord area, Supervisorial District V. A Road Improvement Agreement with CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements, as required in said road improvement agreement, within 2 year(s) from the date of said agreement. Improvements generally consist of road improvements and drainage improvements. Said document was accompanied by security to guarantee the completion of road improvements, as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: I. Cash Bond Performance Amount: $10,920.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP859061 Date: November 8, 2022 Submitted by: CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC II. Surety Bond Bond Company: Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company Bond Number: 47-SUR-300037-01-0243 Date: October 21, 2022 Performance Amount: $1,081,080.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $546,000.00 Principal: Alston Construction Company, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said road improvement agreement is APPROVED. All deposit permits are on file with the Public Works Department. Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Brian Louis- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Stanley Muroaka- DCD, CP Logistics Willow Pass LLC, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/399 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement is required by Condition of Approval No. 63, for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The agreement will not be recorded and the Contra Costa County may not be in full compliance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Stormwater Management Discharge Control Ordinance. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, John Steere, Watershed Program, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control, Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/399 Stormwater Management Facilities Operation & Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/399 Recorded at the request of:Public Works Department - Engineering Services Return To:Public Works, Engineering Services Division THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/399 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547 (APN 185-220-023), Walnut Creek area. (District IV) WHEREAS the Public Works Director has recommended that he be authorized to execute the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Agreement with Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as required by the Conditions of Approval for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023). This agreement would ensure the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities in accordance with the approved Stormwater Control Plan and approved Operation and Maintenance Plan for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), which is located at 2424 Olympic Boulevardin the Walnut Creek area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Larry Gossett 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, John Steere, Watershed Program, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control, Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/400 accepting a Grant Deed of Development Rights for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Grant Deed of Development Rights is required per Condition of Approval No. 63, for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Grant Deed of Development Rights will not be recorded, and the condition of approval will not be satisfied. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett (925)313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting a Grant Deed of Development Rights for subdivision SD20-09547, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/400 Grant Deed of Development Rights MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/400 Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board Return To:Public Works Dept- Simone Saleh THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/400 IN THE MATTER OF accepting a Grant Deed of Development Rights for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following instrument is hereby ACCEPTED: INSTRUMENT: Grant Deed of Development Rights REFERENCE: APN 185-220-023 GRANTOR: Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC AREA: Walnut Creek DISTRICT: IV Contact: Larry Gossett (925)313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/401 approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023) and has determined that all conditions of approval for Final Map approval have been satisfied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Final Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, Great American Insurance Company, Old Republic Title Company, T-09/29/2023 C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/401 Final Map Subdivision Agreement & Improvement Security Bond Tax Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/401 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/401 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), for a project being developed by Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) WHERE AS, the following documents were presented for board approval this date: I. Map The Final Map of subdivision SD20-09547 (cross reference DP20-03023), property located in the Walnut Creek area, Supervisorial District IV, said map having been certified by the proper officials. II. Subdivision Agreement A subdivision agreement with Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within 2 years from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows: A. Cash Bond Performance amount: $4,990.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP859061 Date: November 8, 2022 Submitted by: Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC B. Surety Bond Bond Company: Great American Insurance Company Bond Number: 4531085 Date: October 27, 2022 Performance Amount: $494,010.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $249,500.00 Principal: Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC III. Tax Letter Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 2022-2023 tax lien has been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans. 2. That said Final map is APPROVED and this Board does hereby accept subject to installation and acceptance of improvements on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. 3. That said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Walnut Creek Ventures, LLC, Great American Insurance Company, Old Republic Title Company, T-09/29/2023 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/403 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559 for a project being developed by SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement is required by Condition of Approval No. 91, for subdivision SD21-09559. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The agreement will not be recorded and Contra Costa County may not be in full compliance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Stormwater Management Discharge Control Ordinance. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, John Steere, Watershed Program, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control, SummerHill Oak Road LLC C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/403 Stormwater Management Facilities O & M Agreement and Right of Entry MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/403 Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board Return To:Public Works Dept- Simone Saleh THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/403 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559 (APN 172-012-001, -007, -008, -020, -021, -023, -025, and -026), Walnut Creek area. (District IV) WHEREAS the Public Works Director has recommended that he be authorized to execute the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Agreement with SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as required by the Conditions of Approval for subdivision SD21-09559. This agreement would ensure the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities in accordance with the approved Stormwater Control Plan and approved Operation and Maintenance Plan for subdivision SD21-09559, which is located at 2731 Oak Road in the Walnut Creek area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, John Steere, Watershed Program, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control, SummerHill Oak Road LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/404 approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, for a project being developed by SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for subdivision SD21-09559 and has determined that all conditions of approval for Final Map approval have been satisfied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Final Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, SummerHill Oak Road LLC, Harco National Insurance Company, First American Title Company, T-09/29/2023 C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, Walnut Creek, area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/404 Final Map Subdivision Agreement & Improvement Security Bond Tax Letter & Surety Bond MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2022/404 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/404 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD21-09559, for a project being developed by SummerHill Oak Road LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) WHERE AS, the following documents were presented for board approval this date: I. Map The Final Map of subdivision SD21-09559, property located in the Walnut Creek area, Supervisorial District IV, said map having been certified by the proper officials. II. Subdivision Agreement A subdivision agreement with SummerHill Oak Road LLC, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within 2 years from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows: A. Cash Bond Performance amount: $28,000.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP854961 Date: September 6, 2022 Submitted by: SummerHill Oak Road LLC B. Surety Bond Bond Company: Harco National Insurance Company Bond Number: 0818176 Date: August 10, 2022 Performance Amount: $2,711,000.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $1,369,500.00 Principal: SummerHill Oak Road LLC III. Tax Letter Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 2022-2023 tax lien has been paid in full. Supplemental taxes are estimated to be $206,960.00, with security guaranteeing payment of said tax as follows: · Tax Surety Bond Company: Harco National Insurance Company Bond Number: 0818177 Date: August 18, 2022 Bond Number: 0818177 Date: August 18, 2022 Amount: $253,180.00 Submitted by/Principal: SummerHill Road LLC NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Larry Gossett (925) 313-2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, SummerHill Oak Road LLC, Harco National Insurance Company, First American Title Company, T-09/29/2023 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar rental agreement with Allen Christensen, for a south-facing hangar at Buchanan Field Airport effective November 3, 2022, in the monthly amount of $359.00, Pacheco area (District IV). FISCAL IMPACT: The Airport Enterprise Fund will realize $4,308.00 annually. BACKGROUND: On November 14, 2006, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the form of the T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement for use with renting the County's t-hangars, shade hangars, medium hangars, and executive hangars at Buchanan Field Airport. On February 23, 2007, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the new Large Hangar Rental Agreement for use with the large East Ramp Hangars. On January 16, 2009, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to the T-Hangar and Shade Hangar APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Greg Baer, 925-681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Greg Baer, Director of Airports Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a hangar rental agreement with Buchanan Field Airport Hangar tenant BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Rental Agreement and the Large Hangar Rental Agreement (combined "Hangar Rental Agreements"). The Hangar Rental Agreements are the current forms in use for rental of all the County hangars at Buchanan Field Airport. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action will cause a loss of revenue to the Airport Enterprise Fund. ATTACHMENTS Hangar Rental Agmt pg 4-5 Allen Christensen RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar rental agreement with Rick Burton, for a north-facing shade hangar at Buchanan Field Airport effective November 16, 2022, in the monthly amount of $169.00, Pacheco area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Airport Enterprise Fund will realize $2,028.00 annually. BACKGROUND: On November 14, 2006, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the form of the T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement for use with renting the County's t-hangars, shade hangars, medium hangars, and executive hangars at Buchanan Field Airport. On February 23, 2007, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the new Large Hangar Rental Agreement for use with the large East Ramp Hangars. On January 16, 2009, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Lee, (925) 681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Greg Baer, Director of Airports Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a hangar rental agreement with Buchanan Field Airport hangar tenant BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to the T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement and the Large Hangar Rental Agreement (combined "Hangar Rental Agreements"). The Hangar Rental Agreements are the current forms in use for rental of all the County hangars at Buchanan Field Airport. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action will cause a loss of revenue to the Airport Enterprise Fund. ATTACHMENTS Hangar Rental Agmt B-12 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of Herman Nicholas Barnes and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $61,000, less permanent disability advances. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $61,000, less permanent disability advances. BACKGROUND: Attorney Mark A. Cartier, defense counsel for the County, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of Herman Nicholas Barnes v. Contra Costa County. The Board's November 1, 2022, closed session vote was: Supervisors Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff and Gover - Yes. This action is taken so that the terms of this final settlement and the earlier November 1, 2022, closed session vote of this Board authorizing its negotiated settlement are known publicly. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Case will not be settled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Caoile 335-1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Caoile, Director of Risk Management Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Final Settlement of Claim, Herman Nicholas Barnes vs. Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by Alexander W. Bensch, Moises A. Hernandez Guevara, Darlene Landis, Carson Rhodes, Cheryl Rhodes, Victor White, and Robin Winn. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Alexander W. Bensch: Personal injury claim for a motorcycle accident in the amount of $10,000,000. Moises A. Hernandez Guevara: Personal injury claim for a bicycle accident in an unspecified amount. Darlene Landis: Property claim for lost wallet in the amount of $200. Carson Rhodes: Personal injury claim for vehicle accident in the amount of $8,000,000. Cheryl Rhodes: Personal injury claim for vehicle accident in the amount of $1,000,000. Victor White: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $143. Robin Winn: Personal injury claim for a trip and fall in an amount in excess of $25,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Risk Management I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Not acting on the claims could extend the claimants time limits to file actions against the County. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of October 1, 2022, through October 31, 2022, as recommended by County Counsel. FISCAL IMPACT: Settlement amounts are listed below. BACKGROUND: One agreement to settle pending litigation, as defined in Government Code section 54956.9, became final during the period of October 1, 2022, through October 31, 2022. In re Claim of Peter Fogarty. On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved a settlement in this property damage and personal injury claim arising out of an automobile accident involving a Sheriff’s Office vehicle. The Board authorized settlement in the amount of $200,000, in exchange for a release of all claims, in closed session by a 4-0 vote, Supervisor Burgis absent. The funding source is the Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund. The settlement agreement was fully executed on October 6, 2022. This report includes final settlements APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Thomas L. Geiger, Chief Assistant County Counsel, Karen Caoile, Risk Manager C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of October 1, 2022, through October 31, 2022. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of litigation matters handled by the Office of the County Counsel. This report does not include litigation settlements that were reported by the Risk Management Division of the County Administrator’s Office as a consent item on the Board’s open session agenda. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The report would not be accepted. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for October 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Government Code section 53232.3(d) requires that members of legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging ex cetera). The attached reports were submitted by the Board of Supervisors members in satisfaction of this requirement. District I and V have nothing to report. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors will not be in compliance with Government Code 53232.3(d). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joellen Bergamini 925.655.2000 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for October 2022 ATTACHMENTS District II October 2022 Report District III October 2022 Report District IV October 2022 Report Supervisor Candace Andersen, District 2 – AB1234 Monthly Meeting Report October 2022 Date Meeting Name Location ______ 3 Recycle Smart Zoom meeting 3 TVTC Zoom m eeting 3 Community event Lafayette 4 Board of Supervisors Martinez 5 Familiar Faces Zoom meeting 6 MP&L Zoom meeting 6 Recycle Smart Zoom meeting 7 Street Smarts Alamo 10 TWIC Zoom Meeting 11 Board of Supervisors Martinez 12 CCCERA Zoom meeting 13 CCCTA/LAVTA Zoom meeting 17 Alamo Liaison Meeting Zoom meeting 17 Internal Operations Zoom meeting 17 TVTC Zoom meeting 18 Board of Supervisors Martinez 19 Juvenile Justice Coordinating Comm Zoom meeting 24 Family & Human Services Zoom meeting 24 Public Protection Comm ittee Zoom meeting 24 Reimaging Youth Justice Zoom meeting 25 Board of Supervisors Martinez 26 CCCERA Zoom meeting 26 Alamo Rotary Alamo 27 East Bay EDA Zoom Meeting 27 CCCSWA BOD Zoom Meeting 28 ABAG Exec Board Zoom Meeting Date Meeting Name Location 3-Oct Contra Costa County East Bay Regional Park District Liaison Committee Web Meeting 3-Oct Meeting with County Administrator, Monica Nino Web Meeting 4-Oct Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez 5-Oct Meeting with Employment and Human Services Director, Marla Stuart Web Meeting 5-Oct Meeting with Assemblymember, Lori Wilson Oakley 6-Oct Meeting with Contra Costa County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice Web Meeting 6-Oct Delta Science for Communities Workshop Oakley 10-Oct Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee Meeting Web Meeting 10-Oct *American Public Transportation Association Conference Seattle, WA 11-Oct Board of Supervisors Meeting Web Meeting 11-Oct Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Web Meeting 12-Oct *American Public Transportation Association Conference Seattle, WA 17-Oct Internal Operations Committee Web Meeting 17-Oct Meeting with County Administrator, Monica Nino Web Meeting 17-Oct First 5 Commission Meeting Web Meeting 18-Oct Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez 19-Oct Meeting with Community Advisory Board Member, Crawford Carpenter and Nicole Green Web Meeting 19-Oct Regional Impact Council Meeting Web Meeting 20-Oct Meeting with Chief Probation Officer, Esa Ehmen- Krause Web Meeting 20-Oct John Muir Community Health Fund 25th Anniversary Event Pleasant Hill 21-Oct East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy Board Meeting Web Meeting 24-Oct Family and Human Services Committee Meeting Web Meeting 24-Oct Meeting with Senator, Nancy Skinner Web Meeting 24-Oct Meeting with County Administrator, Monica Nino Web Meeting 25-Oct Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez 26-Oct Delta Conservancy Board Meeting Web Meeting 26-Oct Tri Delta Transit Board Meeting Antioch 27-Oct CAL-ID Remote Access Network Board Meeting Web Meeting Supervisor Diane Burgis - October 2022 AB1234 Report (Government Code Section 53232.3(d) requires that members legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging, etc). 28-Oct Delta Counties Coalition Meeting Web Meeting * Reimbursement may come from an agency other than Contra Costa County Purpose Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Supervisor Diane Burgis - October 2022 AB1234 Report (Government Code Section 53232.3(d) requires that members legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging, etc). Meeting * Reimbursement may come from an agency other than Contra Costa County Supervisor Karen Mitchoff October 2022 DATE MEETING NAME LOCATION PURPOSE 10/04/22 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decision on Agenda Items 10/06/22 Leadership Contra Costa Martinez Community Outreach 10/11/22 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decision on Agenda Items 10/18/22 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decision on Agenda Items 10/25/22 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decision on Agenda Items 10/28/22 ABAG Executive Board Meeting San FranciscoDecision on Agenda Items APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sonia Bustamante (510)409-3004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing El Cerrito Councilmember Janet Abelson for 23 years of dedicated public service to the San Francisco Bay Area AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/396 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/396 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/396 Recognizing El Cerrito Councilmember Janet Abelson for 23 years of dedicated public service to the San Francisco Bay Area WHEREAS, Councilmember Janet Abelson has been a resident of El Cerrito since 1970; and earned a BA degree in English and a MBA in Management from San Francisco State University; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson has been actively involved with El Cerrito High School parent groups over the years, and has served as the Oral Historian/ Biographer since 2005 for the school’s Archiving Project Board; and WHEREAS, she worked with Supervisor John Gioia to develop a student bus pass program to provide free bus passes to low income students in West Contra Costa; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson was first elected to the El Cerrito City Council on November 2, 1999 and has served continuously for 23 years; and served five terms as the Mayor of El Cerrito in 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2017; and WHEREAS, she has been a continuous advocate for the needs of the disabled and for improved accessibility in all modes of transportation and access through her many roles in local and regional government; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson has been a Bay Area transportation leader, serving on the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee for 20 years, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for 18 years, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Advisory Council and the MTC Elderly and Disabled Advisory Committee for 12 years; and served on the Bay Area Rapid Transit District Accessibility Task Force for over 20 years, and on the AC Transit Accessibility Advisory Committee for over 30 years; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson served the League of California Cities on several policy committees including the Housing, Community and Economic Development Policy; Governance, Transparency and Labor Relations; Administrative Services; and on Community Services; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson has served multiple years as a city council liaison for each of the 13 city advisory bodies, serving continuously on the Committee on Aging for more than 17 years; and WHEREAS, Councilmember Abelson was an environmental advocate and active member of El Cerrito’s Earth Day activities for many years, and played a lead role in the creation of El Cerrito's innovative Environmental Quality Committee; and WHEREAS, she has been a leader in many civic organizations including the El Cerrito Democratic Club, Soroptimist International of El Cerrito, El Cerrito Chamber of Commerce, League of Women Voters, and California Walks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors hereby proclaims extreme gratitude and recognition to Councilmember Janet Abelson for her 23 years of dedicated public service to the City of El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and the San Francisco Bay Area. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad, 925-655-2350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:In the matter of honoring Zac Shess for his service on the Board of Directors for the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District (Rec & Park) AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/411 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/411 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/411 In the matter of honoring Zac Shess for his service on the Board of Directors for the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District (Rec & Park) WHEREAS, Zac spent part of his childhood in Pleasant Hill and attended Pleasant Hill Elementary School; and WHEREAS, Zac and his wife Debbie, along with their sons, Cole and Jackson, moved back to Pleasant Hill in 2003; and WHEREAS, Zac has served on the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Board of Directors since being appointed in 2013; and WHEREAS, he was elected for a full term in 2014 and 2018, and for three years, in 2016, 2017, and 2021, Zac was the Board Chair; and WHEREAS, Pleasant Hill Rec & Park is a Special District, an independent government agency separate from the City of Pleasant Hill and other government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Rec & Park District serves over 40,000 people and an area roughly 20% larger than the City of Pleasant Hill; and WHEREAS, the Rec & Park District offers over 2,300 classes, programs, and activities, and promotes an active, healthy lifestyle for preschool, youth, teens, adults, and seniors; and WHEREAS, during Zac’s tenure on the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Board of Directors, the board has had several accomplishments of note, including maintaining a budget surplus every year, completing a comprehensive parks and facilities master plan, and establishing a marketing department to improve the district’s branding; and WHEREAS, the Pleasant Hill Rec & Park District is renovating Pleasant Oaks Park and purchased the Oak Park parkland adjacent to the new library; and WHEREAS, in 2021, the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District championed and adopted a Play for All – Equity and Inclusion Policy, which has the aim to ensure that everyone, including those with a physical or cognitive disability, the LGBTQ community, racial and ethnic minorities, and new Americans, refugees or immigrants, have access to the complete array of benefits that quality parks and recreation offer. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognizes Zac Shess for his hard work and dedication to the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, as well as his service to our community. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sonia Bustamante, District I I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing November 2022 as National Caregivers Month AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/417 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/417 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/417 Recognizing In-Home Care Providers' Courage and National Family Caregivers Month WHEREAS, more than 65 million family caregivers in the United States demonstrate their Courage to Care everyday by providing some form of in-home care to a parent, grandparent, child, aunt or uncle; WHEREAS, the 10,972 IHSS providers in Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services (I.H.S.S.) who deliver quality care to our most vulnerable residents are among these caregivers who have the Courage to Care; WHEREAS, In-Home caregivers not only provide vital care to those in need, but by doing so save taxpayers millions of dollars each year when compared to more costly tax funded institutional care; WHEREAS, the work of In-Home caregivers often goes unnoticed as do the financial struggles caregivers and their families experience in order to provide this lifeline service to those in need; WHEREAS, the number of family and non-family members requiring in-home care will drastically increase as the number of Americans who are 65 years of age and older is expected to double in the next 30 years; WHEREAS, in order to meet the future demands of caregiving, we must ensure a stable workforce by recognizing today the important contributions In-Home caregivers bring to those receiving care, to our communities and to society as a whole, WHEREAS, the month of November is designated as National Family Caregivers Month, which offers the perfect opportunity to highlight the hard work, dedication and courage to care that all In-Home caregivers exemplify everyday – in caring for both family and non-family members; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors strongly supports our In-Home caregivers and acknowledges their Courage to Care by officially recognizing the month of November 2022 as National Family Caregivers Month, and appreciates the essential work and contributions In-Home caregivers bring to Contra Costa County, and will work with them to protect programs and services such as I.H.S.S., keep a fundamental commitment to our low-income seniors and disabled residents, and ask that the State of California and the Federal Government maintain that commitment as well. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Clark Wallace to the District 3 Alternate seat on the Assessment Appeals Board to a term expiring September 3, 2023, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Clark Wallace was previously appointed to the District 3 seat on Assessment Appeals Board. Mr. Wallace resigned from the seat, the vacancy was declared, and that seat is still open with no applications. Mr. Wallace is now being appointed to the District 3 Alternate seat. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINT Clark Wallace to the District 3 Alternate seat on the Assessment Appeals Board RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Allison A. Picard to the Airport Managers Appointee 2 Commissioner seat on the Airport Land Use Commission for a term ending on May 4, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors created the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) in 1970 to promote the orderly development of compatible land uses around each public airport in the County, in order to safeguard both the interests of the general public and the welfare of inhabitants in the areas surrounding the airports. The California Public Utilities Code requires and specifies the composition of the ALUC, whose membership shall include: Two representing the cities in the county, appointed by a city selection committee comprised of the mayors of all the cities within that county, except that if there are any cities contiguous or adjacent to the qualifying airport, at least one representative shall be appointed therefrom. 1. Two representing the county, appointed by the Board of Supervisors.2. Two having expertise in aviation, appointed by a selection committee comprised of the managers of all of the public airports within that county. 3. 4. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Greg Baer, 925-681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:Greg Baer, Director of Airports Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) One representing the general public, appointed by the other six members of the commission. The seat terms are four years, expiring the first Monday in May. The term of the Airport Managers Appointee 2 Commissioner seat expired on May 2, 2022. The Director of Airports conducted interviews on September 21, 2022, and on September 26, 2022, and recommends the appointment of Allison A. Picard to the Airport Managers Appointee 2 Commissioner seat to a term ending on May 4, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Airport Managers Appointee 2 Commissioner seat on the Airport Land Use Commission will remain vacant. ATTACHMENTS ALUC application RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Nicholas Bryant, Interim Director of the Community Services Bureau, as Alternate to Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Department Director, on the Contra Costa First 5 Children and Families Commission. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Ordinance 99-15 (County Children and Families First Commission – Proposition 10) established Contra Costa’s Commission to complement Proposition 10, adopted on November 3, 1998. Section 26-14.008 describes the process for Board appointment of alternate commissioners to include appointing the nominee proposed by the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) Director as the alternate for the EHSD Director. Dr. Alarcon-Bowen, the most recent alternate to the EHSD Director, Marla Stuart, resigned from County service in August 2022. The EHSD Director recommends the appointment APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment of Nicholas Bryant, Interim Director of the Community Services Bureau, as Alternate on First 5 Commission BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Nicholas Bryant, Interim Director of the Community Services Bureau, to serve as her alternate to the First 5 Commission. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this appointment is not approved, the Employment and Human Services Department Director will not have anyone serving as her alternate on the First 5 Commission. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The First 5 Commission addresses critical issues related to children aged 0-5 years old. ATTACHMENTS N. Bryant Alternate First 5 Commission Application RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT the following individuals to seats on the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) for a two-year term with an expiration date of September 30, 2024: -B5 Communications Center Managers’ Association Representative: Michael Schlemmer, Richmond, CA 94804 -B6 Contra Costa Fire Chiefs’ Association Representative: Scott Wannamaker, Concord, CA 94520 -C1 Ambulance Providers (Contra Costa 9-1-1 Service Contract) Representative: Jonas Aguiar, San Ramon, CA 94583 -C6 Emergency Department Physicians – from a Contra Costa County Receiving Hospital Representative: Ari Kestler, Walnut Creek, CA 94523 REAPPOINT the following individuals to seats on the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) for a two-year term with an expiration date of September 30, 2024: -B7 Contra Costa Police Chiefs’ Association Representative: Jon King, Moraga, CA 94556 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The EMCC is a multidisciplinary committee appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, to provide advice and recommendations on EMS-related matters to the Board, Health Services Director, and its EMS Agency. Membership consists of consumer representatives, and representatives of EMS-related organizations and groups. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this board order is not approved, none of the requested seats on the EMCC will be filled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marshall Bennett, (925) 608-5454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointments & Re-Appointments to the Emergency Medical Care Committee ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Charles Tramaine to the Bay Point Municipal Advisry Council Seat No. 2 on the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee with a term expiration of December 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Dissolution of the Los Medanos Community Healthcare District On March 9, 2022, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) recorded a Certificate of Completion (Document No. 2022-0042380) with the County Clerk-Recorder dissolving the Los Medanos Community Healthcare District (LMCHD). The recording was completed following action by the California Supreme Court to deny the Los Medanos Community Healthcare District’s petition requesting review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Los Medanos Community Healthcare District v. Contra Costa LAFCO and Contra Costa County. The lawsuit challenged the dissolution approved by LAFCo and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the County and LAFCo. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925) 655-2043 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINTMENT TO THE LOS MEDANOS HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The dissolution of the District was originally authorized by LAFCo Resolution No. 17-13B, which included certain terms and conditions related to that action. The terms and conditions of the dissolution, among other things, appoint Contra Costa County to serve as successor agency of the dissolved District and charges the County with winding up the former District's affairs, including taking possession and disposing of District assets and liabilities. In addition, the LAFCo terms and conditions require the County to administer a grant program for the benefit of residents in the former District area. The grant program will be funded with ad valorem property tax dollars formerly allocated to the District. Establishment of the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee The Los Medanos Community Health Advisory Committee (the "LMHAC") was created by the Board of Supervisors in 2018 as pursuant to the terms and conditions approved by LAFCo to dissolve the LMCHD. The purpose of the LMHAC is to: 1. Develop an area health plan that identifies the major health disparities that impact residents of the former LMCHD service area, and establishes priorities for improving health outcomes. The plan will be presented to the Board of Supervisors for review and will not be final unless adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The LMHAC may engage an outside consultant to assist in developing the plan. The LMHAC shall submit an updated plan for approval by the Board of Supervisors no less than every five years. 2. Solicit proposals from service providers that are interested in participating the Los Medanos Area Health Plan Grant Program (the "Grant Program") and are capable of addressing the priorities outlined in the adopted plan. Funding for grants will be provided from (i) a special fund established by the Auditor-Controller, at the direction of the Board of Supervisors, that is used to segregate the property tax revenue received by the County as a result of the dissolution of the District, and (ii) any other funds made available to the grant program (e.g. through restricted donations, grants, etc.). 3. Monitor the efficacy of the programs funded by the grant program. 4. Report to the Board of Supervisors no less than once per year on the execution of the adopted plan, the grants provided under the grant program, the results achieved through the adopted plan and the grant program, and other matters that relate to the LMHAC's purpose and duties. Nominations to the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee The LMHAC is composed of seven seats nominated to the Board of Supervisors by the following: (2) from the Pittsburg City Council, (2) from the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council (MAC), (2) from the Health Services Department (one from Public Health and one from Behavioral Health) and (1) from the Internal Operations Committee of the Board of Supervisors. On April 12, 2022, the Board of Supervisors considered and approved the following appointments: Pittsburg City Council. On January 20, 2022, the County sent correspondence to the City of Pittsburg requesting that the City Council forward nominations to fill two seats on the LMHAC no later than March 18, 2022. On March 7, 2022, the City Council passed Resolution No. 22-14062 nominating two members of the City Council to serve on the LMHAC. The County was informed that Vice Mayor Shanelle Scales Preston and Councilmember Jelani Killings would be the representatives serving on behalf of the City Council. Bay Point MAC . On February 1, 2022, the Bay Point MAC began a process to identify nominees from the Bay Point community to serve on the LMHAC. On April 5, 2022, the Bay Point MAC voted to nominate Lloyd Lee Mason and Marcia Lessley to serve as the Bay Point MAC representatives on the LMHAC. Mr. Mason was a previous director on the LMCHD governing board and Ms. Lessley is a current member of the Bay Point MAC. Health Services Department. Following the dissolution of the LMCHD and reorganizations of the Mount Diablo and West Contra Costa Healthcare Districts, Contra Costa County Health Services is the sole public provider of healthcare services within the County. The LMHAC includes two representatives from the Health Services department to ensure that both clinical expertise and knowledge of the current publicly provided healthcare infrastructure is present during discussion of how best to recommend funding allocations for former LMCHD property tax revenue to the Board of Supervisors. The Health Services Director has nominated the following individuals to serve on the LMHAC: Christopher Pedraza (Behavioral Health seat). Mr. Pedraza has worked in the Behavioral Health community for over 15 years with the majority of the time being focused on Substance Use Disorders (SUD). Since coming to Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services five years ago, Christopher has overseen the creation and negotiation of all Alcohol and Other Drugs Services (AODS) contracts and recently took over the oversight of mental health services contracts as well. Along with the contract oversight, Christopher continues to be the Manager overseeing Discovery House, a County-operated, 40-bed men’s residential SUD treatment facility in Martinez and preparing for the implementation of CalAIM within Behavioral Health Services. Dr. Sefanit Mekuria (Public Health seat). Dr. Mekuria completed a residency in both Pediatrics and Preventive Medicine and received her Master’s in Public Health from University of California, Berkeley. She has worked on several projects throughout Contra Costa Public Health and has supported the communicable disease branch as a medical consultant. Currently, Dr. Mekuria is a Medical Director in Public Health and one of the Deputy Health Officers for the county. She is currently the COVID-19 operations section chief supporting the COVID-19 response. In addition to this, she works closely with the school-based clinic programs, aiding in any planning for clinics and also supporting the service providers. Subsequent to approving the six nominations above, the Board approved a recommendation of the Internal Operations Committee appointing a former Los Medanos Healthcare District Board member Dennisha Marsh to the At Large seat for a term to commence the day following Board of Supervisors action through December 31, 2023. Resignation of Bay Point MAC Appointee On November 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors accepted the resignation of Marcia Lessley from the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council No. 2 seat on the Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee. In light of this, the Bay Point MAC convened on November 1, 2022 to consider the appointment of another Council member to serve for the remaining term through December 31, 2024. The Bay Point MAC nominated Charles Tramaine for appointment by the Board. Today's action asks the Board to consider appointment of Mr. Tramaine to the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council No. 2 seat vacated by Ms. Lessley for the remaining term through December 31, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appointment to the Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council No. 2 seat will not be made resulting in the seat remaining vacant. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/415 to add the County Finance Director, in addition to Assistant Risk Managers, as an official alternate to act on behalf of Contra Costa County with regard to official matters of Public Risk Innovation Solutions and Management (PRISM), effective November 1, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: In 1980, Contra Costa County joined the CSAC Excess Insurance Authority (CSAC-EIA), a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for procurement of pooled and group purchased insurance and risk management services to its members including counties, cities, educational organizations, special districts, housing authorities, fire districts and other JPAs. CSAC EIA, changed its name to Public Risk Innovation Solutions and Management (PRISM) in 2020. The PRISM Board of Directors is comprised of one primary representative and an alternate from each member county who has authority to officially act on behalf of that entity along with ten public entity board members. The Board of Directors establishes policy and governs the operations APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Caoile 925-335-1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Caoile, Director of Risk Management Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Add County Finance Director as official alternate to PRISM BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of PRISM. Under Resolution No. 2020/64, this responsibility was appointed to the Director of Risk Management – Exempt and designating Assistant Risk Managers, as the official representative and alternates, respectively, to act on behalf of Contra Costa County regarding official matters of PRISM. The Director of Risk Management designates the alternate via letter by the County Administrator to PRISM. Several Assistant Risk Managers positions have become vacant with retirements in February, March, and October of 2022. This resolution allows for the County Finance Director to also participate as an official alternate. The additional position for alternate will allow for more flexible County representation on behalf of the Director of Risk Management on the PRISM Governing Board. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to designate an official alternate may result in insufficient representation on behalf of Contra Costa County in the business of governance of PRISM. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/415 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/415 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/415 IN THE MATTER OF delegating Authority to Act on Behalf of Contra Costa County with Regard to Official Matters of Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (PRISM). WHEREAS, in 1980, Contra Costa County joined Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (PRISM), formerly CSAC Excess Insurance Authority (CSAC-EIA), for procurement of insurance and risk management services; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure that individuals are authorized to fully act on behalf of their respective entity, PRISM requires the governing board of all member entities to officially designate an official representative who has authority to act on its behalf; and WHEREAS, the official designated representative can be an individual or a position who has been delegated such authority; and WHEREAS, the day-to-day County representative that communicates with PRISM will not change; and WHEREAS, all communications from PRISM will continue to come through the day-to-day County representative. NOW, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as follows: 1. Appoints the Director of Risk Management - Exempt as official representative to enter into agreements with and act on behalf of Contra Costa County regarding official matters of PRISM; 2. Appoints Assistant Risk Managers and the County Finance Director as alternates to the official representative to act on behalf of the County when the official representative is not available. The County Administrator shall provide the name of each Assistant Risk Manager and the County Finance Director assigned to serve as alternate to Director of Risk Management - Exempt for the PRISM Governing Board and various sub-committees on an as needed basis; 3. The above appointments are effective November 1, 2022; 4. This Resolution supercedes Resolution No 2020/64. Contact: Karen Caoile 925-335-1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Joshua Klein to the Member of the Bar seat on the Public Law Library Board of Trustees for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2023 and expiring on December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the County BACKGROUND: The Public Law Library Board of Trustees was established by State law and County Ordinance to maintain a law library in Martinez. The Law Library also operates a branch library in Richmond. The Board of Trustees is the governing body for the Law Library with the authority to determine personnel, fiscal, and administrative policies to fulfill the legal information needs of the community. The Board of Trustees is composed of either four or five judges of the Superior Court, the chair of the County board of supervisors or designee, and as many members of the State Bar appointed by the board of supervisors as is necessary to constitute a body of at least six but no more than seven members. Currently, aside from the designee of the board of supervisors chair, the board of supervisors appoints one trustee who is a member of the State Bar. The Internal Operations Committee annually reviews the appointment to the Member of the Bar seat, which term expires each December 31. At the direction of the Internal Operations Committee, staff opened a four-week recruitment for the Member of the Bar seat (see attached media release) on September 26 and received one application, attached, from Joshua Klein (Moraga). Incumbent Dean Barbieri notified the Committee that he will not re-apply and, instead, supports Mr. Klein's application. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 655-2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Law Library Administrator, CAO (Enea) C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE PUBLIC LAW LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES ATTACHMENTS NEWS RELEASE_PUBLIC LAW LIBRARY OPPORTUNITY Application_Joshua Klein_Law Library Ltr of Support for Joshua Klein from Dean Barbieri Contra Costa County County Administrator’s Office • 1025 Escobar St. • Martinez, CA 94553 • www.contracosta.ca.gov Media Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea Monday , September 2 6, 202 2 Phone: (925) 655-2056 Email: julie.enea@cao.cccounty.us WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC LAW LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES ? The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is seeking applicants for the Public Law Library Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees was established pursuant to State law and County Ordinance to maintain a law library in Martinez and a branch library in Richmond. The Board of Trustees is the governing body for the Law Library with the aut hority to determine personnel, fiscal, and administrative policies to fulfill the legal information needs of the community. County residents who are members of the State Bar and have an interest in public policy and library administration are encouraged to apply for this non-paid volunteer opportunity. The County Board of Supervisors will appoint to fill one vacancy for a one-year term beginning January 1, 2023 and ending on December 31, 20 23. The Board of Trustees normally meets on the first Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Martinez. Application forms can be obtained from the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors by calling (925) 655-2000 or the application can be completed online by visiting the County website at https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/3418. Applications should be returned to the Clerk o f the Board of Supervisors, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar St., Martinez, CA 94553 no later than by 5 p.m. on Friday, October 21, 2022. Applicants should plan to be available for public interviews to be conducted virtually via Zoom on Monday, November 14, 2022. More information about the Contra Costa Public Law Library can be obtained by calling Carey Rowan at (925) 646-2783 or Carey.Rowan@LL.cccounty.us , or visiting the Law Library website at http://www.cccpllib.org . # # # # Submit Date: Oct 04, 2022 First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Email Address Employer Job Title Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile District Locator Tool Resident of Supervisorial District: District 2 Length of Employment 8 years Do you work in Contra Costa County? Yes No If Yes, in which District do you work? How long have you lived or worked in Contra Costa County? 8 years Are you a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces? Yes No Board and Interest Which Boards would you like to apply for? Public Law Library Board of Trustees (BOS appointee): Submitted Joshua A.Klein Moraga CA 94556 California Department of Justice Deputy Solicitor General Joshua A. Klein Seat Name Vacant seat Jan 2023 - Dec 2023 Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Yes No If Yes, how many meetings have you attended? Approximately 7 Education Select the option that applies to your high school education * High School Diploma College/ University A Name of College Attended Amherst College Degree Type / Course of Study / Major BA / Interdisciplinary Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Name of College Attended Stanford Law School Degree Type / Course of Study / Major JD Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University C Name of College Attended Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Joshua A. Klein Degree Awarded? Yes No Other Trainings & Occupational Licenses Other Training A Natl Institute for Trial Advocacy - course in trial advocacy Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Other Training B U.S. Department of Justice National Advocacy Center - trial advocacy training Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Occupational Licenses Completed: California State Bar # 226480 Qualifications and Volunteer Experience Joshua A. Klein Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, commitee, or commission. I view California's public law libraries as fulfilling three important roles. First, they are resources for practicing lawyers -- particularly solo practitioners and those in small firms with limited library resources of their own. Second, they are resources for judges, court staff, and public agencies located near the libraries. And third, they serve an important role in improving access to justice among underserved Californians. This last role is perhaps the aspect in which the Contra Costa Law Library most dramatically serves the public, and the aspect which leads especially to my interest in serving on the Board. The challenge of assisting unrepresented members of the public with their legal needs has received attention from members of the state judiciary, state bar, and Legislature. Many Californians with legal needs are unable to afford to retain lawyers, and nonprofit and pro bono responses, while important, cannot fully fill that gap. The Contra Costa Public Law Library plays an important role, by making form books, self-help guides, online databases, and treatises available; by having reference librarians on duty to help patrons find appropriate resources; and through the Lawyer in the Library program which staffs volunteer attorneys from the local legal community to consult with those facing legal challenges. I am applying to the Public Library Board of Trustees in order to help the Library further those goals. I would look forward to speaking with Library staff about their current user-base, and considering ways to maintain, and (where appropriate) expand, the services available to those users. One step in that process might be to undertake a survey of walk-in patrons, judges, bar members, and county and municipal offices to better understand how each group uses the library, and the kinds of resources they may lack themselves that the library could reasonably help supply. A further step could be to confer with community groups, public legal service groups, and the Contra Costa County Bar Association to find out ways that the library could better serve unrepresented litigants, in cooperation with the Superior Court's Self-Help Resources Centers. The Board also has an important role to play in overseeing the planned build-out of the library facility that will be located in the new county building in Martinez. Finally, a constant and increasing challenge for the library is funding. The Legislature has chosen to fund public law libraries through a portion of civil filing fees. But legislatively imposed caps, originating in past budget crises, have caused the adequacy of the state contribution to decrease over time, particularly when measured against inflation. Our County's law library has done impressive work over the years to try to preserve services--but has needed to make cutbacks at times, affecting the accessibility of services. A top priority must be creative thinking, and partnerships with local sponsors, to ensure that library services are maintained--and hopefully expanded--in the challenging fiscal environment. Fortunately, the Public Law Library has an engaged, experienced, and thoughtful professional staff that has managed its resources and met its mission well. I would look forward to working with that staff, including the Library Director, to ensure that the Public Law Library continues to serve its important role for the people of Contra Costa County. Joshua A. Klein Upload a Resume Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this application) I have been licensed to practice law in California since 2003. I have served as court staff, have been in private practice, and have practiced public law for both the state and federal Department of Justice. (A full description of my career can be found in the resume I am attaching with this application.) My mode of practice relies heavily on library resources, and I am well positioned to evaluate how the Public Law Library can best serve the needs of its diverse users. In addition, I have a long history of service to the profession -- including as a past Chair of the Federal Courts Committee of the State Bar, and as a current member of the Executive Committee of the Appellate Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco. I am active in local bar associations, such as the Contra Costa Bar Association, the Bar Association of San Francisco, the Edward J. McFetridge Inn of Court, and the Northern District of California chapter of the Federal Bar Association--and my knowledge of those organizations could assist the Board in efforts to gain support from local bar members both for the financial needs of the library and for volunteer programs such as the Lawyer in the Library program. Finally and most importantly, I have spent the last year becoming familiar with the Public Law Library's programs and needs. I have attended most of the Board's meetings over the past year, to learn about ongoing efforts and challenges. I have spoken with the Library Director about the challenges of providing services despite difficulties caused by budget and pandemic constraints, and about the effort to design library space in the new county building in Martinez. By observing and taking part in such discussions, I have become quite familiar with the library's mission and needs, and the excellent leadership that the library receives from its Board and professional staff. I would be honored and excited to be able to contribute to the Contra Costa Public Law Library's important role in meeting the needs of our County's people. Would you like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which you may be qualified? Yes No Do you have any obligations that might affect your attendance at scheduled meetings? Yes No If Yes, please explain: I might be unable to attend meetings that happen to conflict with scheduled court dates. However, I expect such conflicts to be infrequent. Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board? Yes No If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you are currently serving: If Yes, please also list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served: Joshua A. Klein List any volunteer or community experience, including any advisory boards on which you have served. Member of Executive Committee, Appellate Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco (2015- present). Past member (2014-2016), vice-chair (2016-2017), and chair (2017-2018), Committee on Federal Courts of the California State Bar and California Lawyers Association Conflict of Interest and Certification Do you have a familial or financial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships listed under the "Important Information" section below or Resolution No. 2021/234) Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please Agree with the Following Statement I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and undersand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand that misstatements and/or omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. I Agree Important Information Joshua A. Klein 1. This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: (1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and (2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 7. As indicated in Board Resolution 2021/234, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors' member in any of the following relationships: (1) Mother, father, son, and daughter; (2) Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; (3) Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; (4) Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297; (5) The relatives, as defined in 1 and 2 above, for a registered domestic partner; (6) Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov't Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. Joshua A. Klein October 28, 2021 Joshua A. Klein , Oakland, CA 94612 Professional Experience 2014 – present Deputy Solicitor General, California Department of Justice. Civil and criminal litigation on behalf of the State of California and its officers and agencies. Special emphasis on cases at the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of California. Received Attorney General’s Awards in 2019, 2020, and 2021, for work defending Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), California Values Act, and state COVID response, and challenging federal border wall construction. Significant matters include:  U.S. Supreme Court: Co-authored certiorari- and merits-stage briefs in Trump v. Sierra Club, No. 20-138 (challenging border-wall construction); co-authored brief in S. Bay Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, 140 S. Ct. 1613 (2020) (defending COVID-related restrictions); presented oral argument and wrote certiorari- and merits-stage briefs in Nat’l Inst. of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S. Ct. 2361 (2018) (defending pregnancy clinic disclosure statute against First Amendment challenge); principal author of multi-state amicus briefs in Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2162 (2019), and Murr v. Wisconsin, 137 S. Ct. 1933 (2017) (Takings Clause); principal author of petition-stage briefs resulting in summary reversal in Johnson v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 1802 (2016) (federal habeas); co-authored merits-stage briefs in Davis v. Ayala, 135 S. Ct. 2187 (2015) (federal habeas; received Best Brief Award from National Association of Attorneys General).  California Supreme Court: Wrote merits brief and presented argument in In re Humphrey, 11 Cal. 5th 135 (2021) (unconstitutionality of unaffordable bail), and People v. Lemcke, 11 Cal. 5th 644 (2021) (improvements to eyewitness identification instructions); wrote merits brief in People v. Kopp, No. S257844 (unconstitutionality of unaffordable court user fees); wrote amicus brief in In re Webb, 7 Cal. 5th 270 (2019) (conditions of release as alternative to high bail); presented oral argument and was principal author of merits briefs in People v. Morales, 63 Cal. 4th 399 (2016) (Proposition 47 interpretation); co-author of merits briefs in People v. Rinehart, 1 Cal. 5th 652 (2016), cert. den. 138 S. Ct. 635 (2016) (defending state environmental law against federal preemption challenge).  Other Courts: Drafted briefs and presented oral arguments in Givens v. Newsom, 830 F. App’x 560 (9th Cir. 2020) (defending COVID-related restrictions against First Amendment challenge), San Francisco v. Barr, 965 F.3d 753 (9th Cir. 2020) (challenging immigration-related conditions on federal grants to state law enforcement), and Higginson v. Becerra, 786 F. App’x 705 (9th Cir. 2019) (defending California Voting Rights Act against constitutional challenge); presented en banc oral argument and drafted related brief in Retail Digital Network LLC v. Prieto, 861 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2017) (defending alcohol regulations against First Amendment challenge). 2011 – 2014 Assistant United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. Served in Violent & Organized Crime Section and General Crimes Section. Investigations, trials, and appeals involving racketeering, gangs, drug conspiracies, child exploitation, fraud, identity theft, computer hacking, and other federal crimes. Significant matters include:  Presented oral argument and co-authored briefs in United States v. Christensen, 801 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2015) (complex case with six appellants and 24 issues presented, regarding Anthony Pellicano wiretapping conspiracy).  Investigation and indictment in United States v. Laredo, No. 13-537 (C.D. Cal.) (31-defendant RICO-conspiracy case against members/associates of Mexican Mafia and affiliated gang); superseding indictment and multi-defendant trial in United States v. Garcia-Reyes, No. 12-606 (C.D. Cal.) (drug-conspiracy case resulting in conviction of 15 out of 17 defendants, including two convictions at trial). Investigation and indictment in United States v. Sears, No. 14-274 (C.D. Cal.) (31-count indictment for child exploitation, computer hacking, and identity theft offenses involving dozens of underage victims). Successful recusal motion in United States v. Perez, No. 11-1238 (C.D. Cal.) (recusing federal judge for improper behavior). 2 2008 – 2011 Assistant United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Served in Felony Major Crimes Section and General Crimes Section. Prosecuted cases involving violent crime, drug and gun offenses, and drug-diversion healthcare fraud. Made regular court appearances and conducted frequent trials in D.C. Superior Court. Major cases include United States v. Tornero, No. 2009-CF3-6524 (D.C. Super. Ct.) (four-week jury trial resulting in convictions on 12 charges and 24-year sentence). 2005 – 2008 Associate, Baker Botts LLP (Washington, D.C.). Trial and appellate litigation in civil and criminal cases, including Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 2007 WL 891675 (D.D.C. 2007), and 537 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (defended federal regulatory agency against separation-of-powers challenge); United States v. Rasberry, No. 05-50190 (5th Cir.) (as court-appointed appellate counsel, wrote brief resulting in negotiated six-year sentence reduction); SEC v. Jones, 476 F. Supp. 2d 374 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (defended individual from securities fraud claims); Polymer Dynamics, Inc. v. Bayer Corp., 341 F. App’x 771 (3d Cir. 2009) (wrote briefs in cross-appeals from jury verdict); and United States v. Davis, No. 06-193 (D.D.C.) (second-chaired defense in criminal bank fraud trial; conviction subsequently reversed based on objections we raised at trial). 2004 – 2005 Law Clerk to the Honorable Sandra Day O’Connor, Supreme Court of the United States. 2003 – 2004 Associate, O’Melveny & Myers LLP (Washington, D.C.). Litigation in federal and state courts, in cases including Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225 (2004) (amicus brief on behalf of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers). 2002 – 2003 Law Clerk to the Honorable Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Summer, 2001 Summer Associate, Mayer, Brown & Platt LLP (Chicago, Illinois), and Jenner & Block LLP (Washington, D.C.). 1997 – 1999 Case Assistant, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar LLP (Boston, Massachusetts). 1996 – 1997 Deputy Campaign Manager, Committee to Elect Martha Coakley (Boston, Massachusetts). Education 1999 – 2002 Stanford Law School (Palo Alto, California). J.D. 2002.  Graduated first in class, Order of the Coif, and with distinction. GPA: 3.98.  First Year Prize, Second Year Prize, and Nathan Abbott Prize. Belcher Prize in Evidence.  Executive Editor, Stanford Law Review. Wrote student note: Commerce Clause Questions After Morrison: Notes on the New Formalism and the New Realism, 55 STAN. L. REV. 571 (2002).  Research and Teaching Assistant to Dean Kathleen Sullivan. Research Assistant to Professor Deborah Rhode.  Member, university-wide disciplinary panel. Volunteer, East Palo Alto Community Law Center.  Violin and chamber music studies with members of the St. Lawrence String Quartet. Recipient, Brest-LaFollette-Culley music scholarship. 1992 – 1996 Amherst College (Amherst, Massachusetts). A.B. 1996. Graduated magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa. Interdisciplinary major in Theories of Politics and Literature. Honors thesis: “Political Understandings: An Essay on Reason, Interpretation, and Consensus.” Crowell and Billings Latin Prizes. Member, Amherst College Orchestra and Amherst College Water Polo. 3 Selected Presentations  Presenter, Discretionary Review Courts and Courts of Last Resort, California Department of Justice (Online: Sept. 15, 2021).  Panelist, Litigation Update—Part 2, Attorney General Alliance (Online: July 28, 2020).  Presenter, Oral Advocacy in State and Federal Appellate Courts, California Department of Justice (San Diego and Oakland: September 24 and October 3, 2019).  Speaker at brown-bag lunch for U.C. Hastings students interested in public and government service (San Francisco: February 26, 2019).  Moderator, New Developments for Federal Litigators, California Lawyers Association Litigation Summit (San Francisco: October 5, 2018).  Panelist, Preview of 2017 U.S. Supreme Court Term, Bar Association of San Francisco (San Francisco: October 10, 2017).  Presenter, Review Granted: Now What? Writing Effective Merits Briefs for the California Supreme Court, California Department of Justice (San Francisco and San Diego: August 17 & 22, 2017).  Panelist, U.S. Supreme Court: Review of 2015 Term and Preview of 2016 Term, Contra Costa County Bar Association (Walnut Creek: November 18, 2016).  Presenter, Discretionary Review and Policymaking Courts, California Department of Justice (San Francisco, Oakland, and Sacramento: August 16-18, 2016).  Panelist, Great Expectations: What Appellate Lawyers Expect from Appellate Judges, and Vice Versa, American Bar Association Annual Meeting (San Francisco: August 5, 2016).  Panelist, California Supreme Court: Looking Back and Looking Forward, Bar Association of San Francisco (San Francisco: April 27, 2016). Other  Member, American Bar Association, American Constitution Society, Bar Association of San Francisco, California Lawyers Association Litigation Section, Contra Costa County Bar Association, Federal Bar Association, and Jewish Bar Association of San Francisco. Honorary Member, Commercial Bar Association of England and Wales.  Member of Executive Committee, Appellate Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco (2015- present); past member (2014-2016), vice-chair (2016-2017), and chair (2017-2018), Committee on Federal Courts of the California State Bar and California Lawyers Association.  Member, Edward J. McFetridge Inn of Court (San Francisco); past member, Los Angeles Criminal Justice Inn of Court (2012-2014), Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court (2009-2011), and American Inns of Court Temple Bar Scholarship Committee (2013); Temple Bar Scholar (London: 2005).  Trial-advocacy training through the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) and the U.S. Department of Justice National Advocacy Center (NAC).  Volunteer Mentor, The Appellate Project (mentoring project designed to increase diversity among practitioners of appellate law).  Personal interests include violin and chamber music, history, and literature. RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Neil Tsutsui to the Board of Supervisors Appointee seat on the East Bay Regional Parks District Park Advisory Committee for the two-year term of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the County. BACKGROUND: The Park Advisory Committee (PAC) is a 21-member citizens' advisory group appointed by the East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors. Candidates are nominated by individual Park District Board members and a variety of other public entities, such as the Mayors' Conference, Board of Supervisors, and Special District Chapters of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. The PAC studies issues and makes recommendations and comments on a spectrum of policy issues, such as grazing, dogs, horses and bikes in parks, the Park District budget, naming park facilities, park land use plans, new concessions, and more. Members are appointed for two-year terms and may serve a total of four consecutive terms, or eight years. Meetings are held monthly in Oakland. In May 2017, Neil Tsutsui (El Cerrito) was appointed to the Board of Supervisors Appointee seat to complete the unexpired term of the seat vacated by Colin Coffey, when Mr. Coffey was appointed to the EBRPD Board of Directors. Mr. Tsutsui was reappointed to a second term on January 1, 2019 and a third term on January 1, 2021. At the direction of the Internal Operations Committee, staff initiated a four-week recruitment with the attached press release on September 26, 2022. Two applications, attached, were received from Chad Follmer, (Lafayette) and Neil Tsutsui, incumbent (El Cerrito). At its November 21, 2022 special meeting, the Internal Operations Committee considered both applicants and recommends the reappointment of Mr. Tsutsui. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 655-2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARKS DISTRICT PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE ATTACHMENTS Media Release_EBRPD PAC 2022 Candidate Application_Chad Follmer_EBRPD PAC Candidate Application_Neil Tsutsui_EBRPD PAC Contra Costa County County Administrator’s Office • 1025 Es cobar St. • Martinez, CA 94553 • www.contracosta.ca.gov Media Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea Monday , September 2 6, 202 2 Phone: (925) 655-2056 Email: julie.enea@cao.cccounty.us WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARKS DISTRICT PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE ? The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is seeking an individual who is interested in park land use to represent the County on the East Bay Regional Parks District Park Advisory Committee (PAC). The PAC is a 21-member citizens' advisory group that studies issues and makes recommendations and comments on myriad policy issues, such as grazing, dogs, horses and bikes in parks, the Park District budget, naming of park facilities, park land use plans, new concessions, and more. Members are appointed for two-year terms and may serve a total of four consecutive terms, or eight years. The term of office for this app ointment will be January 1, 2023- December 31, 2024. Service is voluntary and members receive no compensation. Meetings are held virtually from 4 PM to 6 PM on the fourth Monday of each month via Zoom. Appli cation forms for the Contra Costa County seat can be obtained from the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors by calling (925) 655-2000, or the application can be completed online by visiting the County website at https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/3418. Applications should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar St., Martinez, CA 94553, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 21, 2022. Applicants should plan to be available for public interviews virtually via Zoom on Monday, November 14, 2022. More information about the Park Advisory Committee can be obtained by calling Erich Pfuehler at the East Bay Regional Parks District at (510) 544 -2006. # # # # Submit Date: Oct 10, 2022 First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Email Address Employer Job Title Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile District Locator Tool Resident of Supervisorial District: District 2 Length of Employment 29 years Do you work in Contra Costa County? Yes No If Yes, in which District do you work? District 2 How long have you lived or worked in Contra Costa County? 15 years Are you a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces? Yes No Board and Interest Which Boards would you like to apply for? East Bay Regional Park District's Park Advisory Committee - BOS Appointee: Submitted Chad M Follmer Lafayette CA 94549 Woodruff Sawyer Risk Management Consultant - Insurance Broker Chad M Follmer Seat Name Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Yes No If Yes, how many meetings have you attended? Education Select the option that applies to your high school education * High School Diploma College/ University A Name of College Attended University of Georgia Degree Type / Course of Study / Major BBA Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Name of College Attended Wake Forest University Degree Type / Course of Study / Major MBA Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University C Name of College Attended Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Chad M Follmer Upload a Resume Degree Awarded? Yes No Other Trainings & Occupational Licenses Other Training A Associate of Risk Management Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Other Training B Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Occupational Licenses Completed: Qualifications and Volunteer Experience Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, commitee, or commission. I am an avid park user and hiker / mountain biker. I back up to Briones but I have covered many of the trails in most of the EB Regional Parks Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this application) I would bring a valuable perspective as a risk management, real estate and environmentally experienced risk management professional. I am very familiar with liability, contractual and insurance related risks Would you like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which you may be qualified? Yes No Do you have any obligations that might affect your attendance at scheduled meetings? Yes No Chad M Follmer If Yes, please explain: Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board? Yes No If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you are currently serving: If Yes, please also list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served: List any volunteer or community experience, including any advisory boards on which you have served. Conflict of Interest and Certification Do you have a familial or financial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships listed under the "Important Information" section below or Resolution No. 2021/234) Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please Agree with the Following Statement I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and undersand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand that misstatements and/or omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. I Agree Chad M Follmer Important Information 1. This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: (1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and (2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 7. As indicated in Board Resolution 2021/234, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors' member in any of the following relationships: (1) Mother, father, son, and daughter; (2) Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; (3) Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; (4) Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297; (5) The relatives, as defined in 1 and 2 above, for a registered domestic partner; (6) Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov't Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. Chad M Follmer Chad Follmer SVP & Partner - Healthcare & Life Science Practice Leader For 20 years, Chad has been bringing unique and proactive solutions to clients in the healthcare & life science industry. A leader in his field, Chad has a deep understanding of the complex risks facing these organizations and knows how to create & deliver the optimal risk management solutions to protect their assets, people and reputations. Chad specializes in the risks modern organizations in the healthcare and Life Science industry face, including: •Products & Professional Liability •Regulatory risks •Data Privacy & Cyber Risks •Alternative risk finance structures such as captives, RRGs, SIRs & Trusts •Global Risk Management Programs These insurance and risk management solutions have created tremendous value for clients in volatile markets and is particularly applicable today as companies explore new business models to succeed under healthcare reform’s increased regulatory and financial pressures. Chad has led several practices around this specialty and was most recently managing director, health care and life science practice leader for the western region of Marsh. Chad is a “Risk and Insurance” Power Broker award recipient and is member of and frequent presenter at leading industry associations such as ASHRM, CAHF and HFMA. He authors the blog “The Virtual Housecall: Healthcare Trends and Risks.” Chad completed the Executive Education course on Exotic Risk Management at the Wharton School, received his MBA from Wake Forest University and completed his bachelor’s degree in Risk Management at the University of Georgia. Submit Date: Oct 13, 2022 First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Email Address Employer Job Title Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile District Locator Tool Resident of Supervisorial District: District 1 Length of Employment 15 years Do you work in Contra Costa County? Yes No If Yes, in which District do you work? How long have you lived or worked in Contra Costa County? 13 years Are you a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces? Yes No Board and Interest Which Boards would you like to apply for? East Bay Regional Park District's Park Advisory Committee - BOS Appointee: Submitted Neil D Tsutsui El Cerrito CA 94530 UC Berkeley Professor Neil D Tsutsui Seat Name Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Yes No If Yes, how many meetings have you attended? I have attended nearly every meeting since my appointment to this board in June 2017 Education Select the option that applies to your high school education * High School Diploma College/ University A Name of College Attended Boston University Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Biology, specialization in Marine Science Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Name of College Attended UC San Diego Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University C Name of College Attended Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Neil D Tsutsui Degree Awarded? Yes No Other Trainings & Occupational Licenses Other Training A Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Other Training B Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Occupational Licenses Completed: Qualifications and Volunteer Experience Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, commitee, or commission. During the past five years, it has been my great pleasure to represent Contra Costa County as the Board of Supervisors appointee to the EBRPD Parks Advisory Committee (PAC). As you know, these years have been filled with great challenges and difficulty, as well as renewal and opportunity. I am proud of my work on the PAC, helping to steer the Park District through these events, I am excited at the possibility of continuing for another term as the BOS appointee to the PAC. As a professor of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management at UC Berkeley, I am keenly aware of the environmental challenges that we face today, and I am well-versed in a variety of topics related to ecology and global change. In my professional life, I have previously served on many committees related to personnel, instruction, research, budgets, etc. at the levels of department, college, campus, and UC-wide. I believe that effective engagement with a variety of different user groups is crucial for the continued support of the parks, and that this engagement benefits society generally. In particular, I am interested in continuing to support and develop collaborations between the parts and student groups (university and K12), research scientists, and individuals from underrepresented groups. I have extensive experience collaborating on complex projects, and achieving measurable results within budgetary guidelines and on time. Neil D Tsutsui Upload a Resume Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this application) As mentioned above, I have served as the Contra Costa County BOS appointee to the Park District PAC since 2017. In this time, I have been actively engaged in meetings of the committee as well as the regular Board field trips and site visits. This past year, I’m proud that my colleagues on the PAC elected me as their Vice-chair. I believe that this long and deep experience in the East Bay Parks as uniquely prepared me to serve as the BOS appointee to the Parks Advisory Committee. Outside of my PAC service, I have extensive experience in management of natural areas. This year, after a campuswide search, I was selected as the Faculty Director of UC Berkeley’s five Central Sierra Field Research Stations. In this capacity, I manage staff, oversee the budgets, raise external funds, and guide programmatic and capital projects for these field stations and their thousands of acres of Sierra Nevada lands. More locally, I recently served for two years on the UC Berkeley Long Range Development Plan committee, focusing on the future use and preservation of the largely undeveloped Hill Campus in the Berkeley hills. Third, I have also served as a member of the Sagehen Creek Field Station Advisory Committee, helping to guide the this heavily-used UC Natural Reserve through the difficulties of a COVID-19 associated closure and the hiring and onboarding of a new station manager. Fourth, I am a faculty affiliate of the UC Berkeley Institute for People, Parks, and Biodiversity, and have twice served on the search committee for a new Executive Director. Finally, as a professor and scientist, I study ecology and evolution for a living, and am recognized as a world expert on invasive species and insect behavior. I am deeply immersed in the scientific literature, with expertise in a wide range of fields – from genetics, genomics, and molecular biology up to organismal behavior and evolutionary theory. I oversee a medium-sized research lab at UC Berkeley I have been funded continuously with competitive federal and state grants. I teach and mentor students in ecology, evolution, and environmental science, including undergraduates, PhD graduate students, and post-doctoral researchers. Would you like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which you may be qualified? Yes No Do you have any obligations that might affect your attendance at scheduled meetings? Yes No If Yes, please explain: Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board? Yes No If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you are currently serving: EBRPD Parks Advisory Committee Neil D Tsutsui If Yes, please also list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served: EBRPD Parks Advisory Committee List any volunteer or community experience, including any advisory boards on which you have served. EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, Parks Advisory Committee. Appointed by Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. June 2017–present. Sierra Club, West Contra Costa Chapter. Vice-chair, May 2020-May 2022. El Cerrito Environmental Quality Committee (2017-present; Vice-chair, 2019-2020; Chair, 2020-2022). Conflict of Interest and Certification Do you have a familial or financial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships listed under the "Important Information" section below or Resolution No. 2021/234) Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please Agree with the Following Statement I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and undersand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand that misstatements and/or omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. I Agree Important Information Neil D Tsutsui 1. This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: (1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and (2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 7. As indicated in Board Resolution 2021/234, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors' member in any of the following relationships: (1) Mother, father, son, and daughter; (2) Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; (3) Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; (4) Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297; (5) The relatives, as defined in 1 and 2 above, for a registered domestic partner; (6) Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov't Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. Neil D Tsutsui Tsutsui, Neil D. Curriculum Vitae 1 CURRICULUM VITAE (abbreviated) NEIL DURIE TSUTSUI Professor and Michelbacher Chair University of California, Berkeley Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management 130 Mulford Hall, #3114 Berkeley CA 94720-3114 EDUCATION PhD in Biology, September 2000 University of California, San Diego – Department of Biology BA in Biology, specialization in Marine Science. Boston University, September 1994 PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS University of California, Berkeley Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management - Faculty Director, Central Sierra Field Research Stations, 2022-present - Michelbacher Endowed Chair in Systematic Entomology, 2017-present - Full Professor, 2014-present - Affiliate Faculty, Essig Museum of Entomology, 2007-present - Vice Chair for Instruction, 2010-2012, 2014-2015 - Associate Professor, 2009-2014 - Assistant Professor, 2007-2009 University of California, Irvine Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology - Assistant Professor, 2003-2007 University of California, Davis Section of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology - Post-doctoral Associate, 2000-2003 10 MOST RECENT PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS (of 73 total) Tonione, M. A., K. Bi, R. R. Dunn, A. Lucky, and N. D. Tsutsui. 2022. Phylogeography and population genetics of a widespread cold-adapted ant, Prenolepis imparis. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY 31(18):4884-4899. van Wilgenburg, E., M. Mariotta, and N. D. Tsutsui. 2022. The effect of diet on colony recognition and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. INSECTS 13(4):335. Maccaro, J. J., B. A. Whyte, and N. D. Tsutsui. 2020. The ant who cried wolf? Short-term repeated exposure to alarm pheromone reduces behavioral response in Argentine ants. INSECTS 11(12):871. Tonione, M. A., K. Bi, and N. D. Tsutsui. 2020. Transcriptomic signatures of cold adaptation and heat stress in the thermally sensitive winter ant (Prenolepis imparis). PLOS ONE 15(10):e0239558. Tsutsui, Neil D. Curriculum Vitae 2 Sánchez-Restrepo, A. F., L. Chifflet, V. A. Confalonieri, N. D. Tsutsui, M. A. Pesquero, and L. A. Calcaterra. 2020. Species delimitation and molecular phylogenetics of South American fire ant decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae: Pseudacteon). PLOS ONE 15(7):e0236086. Adams, S. A. and N. D. Tsutsui. 2020. The evolution of species recognition labels in insects. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS ROYAL SOCIETY LONDON B. 375: 20190476. Tonione, M. A., S. Cho, G. Richmond, C. Irian, N. D. Tsutsui. 2020. Thermal acclimation ability differs between high- and low- elevation populations of the winter ant, Prenolepis imparis. ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION 8:11385-11398. Naughton, I., C. Boser, N. D. Tsutsui, and D. A. Holway. 2020. Direct evidence of native ant displacement by the Argentine ant in island ecosystems. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS 22:681-691. Felden, A., C. I. Paris, D. G. Chapple, A. V. Suarez, N. D. Tsutsui, P. J. Lester, and M. A. M. Gruber. 2019. Native and introduced Argentine ant populations are characterised by distinct transcriptomic signatures associated with behaviour and immunity. NEOBIOTA. 49:105-126. Buellesbach, J., B. A. Whyte, B., E. Cash, J. D. Gibson, K. J. Scheckel, R. Sandidge, and N. D. Tsutsui. 2018. Desiccation resistance and micro-climate adaptation: Cuticular hydrocarbon signatures of different Argentine ant supercolonies across California. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY 44:1101-1114. GRANT SUPPORT Currently active grants: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, LONG-TERM RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY (LTREB), Holway, D. A. (lead), Tsutsui as co-PI. “LTREB Collaborative Proposal: Large-scale removal of introduced ants as a test of community reassembly” (renewal). Aug. 2022 – April 2027. $599,997 (UCB $300,002). NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, DIVISION OF BIOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DBI), “Collaborative Research: Digitization TCN: Extending Anthophila research through image and trait digitization (Big-Bee)”, Seltmann, K. (lead), Tsutsui and eight others as co-PI. Sept. 2021 – Aug. 2024. $1,288,241 (UCB $235,963). CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION GENOMICS PROJECT, “Conservation genomics of three California ant species”, Tsutsui, N.D. (lead) and P.S. Ward. Nov. 2020 – July 2022, $78,298 (UCB $45,645). US DEPT. OF DEFENSE, STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (SERDP), “RNAi development for invasive ant eradication”, Tsutsui, N. D. (lead), and B. Hoffmann, T. Walsh. May 2021 – Jan. 2023. $592,433 (UCB $316,763). Previous grants: ~$5 million in grants from federal and state agencies and private foundations. TEACHING EXPERIENCE & MENTORSHIP GRADUATE STUDENTS ADVISED: - 12 PhD students since 2003. POST-DOCTORAL RESEARCHERS ADVISED: - 12 since 2003. PHD STUDENT COMMITTEE MEMBER - 42 since 2003. UNDERGRADUATES MENTORED: >100 since 2003. Tsutsui, Neil D. Curriculum Vitae 3 COURSES TAUGHT: UC-Berkeley - Insect Behavior (ESPM150, ESPM142), 11 times since 2008. - Molecular Approaches to Environmental Problem Solving (ESPM 192), 4 times. - Advanced Topics in Chemical Ecology, Behavior (ESPM290), 6 times. - Senior Seminar-Conservation & Resource Studies (ESPM194), 3 times. - Environmental Science Forum (ESPM 201C), 1 time. UC-Irvine - Graduate Core in Evolution, 1 time. - Advanced Evolutionary Biology (BS168), 3 times. - Freshman Seminar (BS2B), “Social behavior of ants”, 4 times. PRESENTATIONS & PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS - 76 departmental seminars and conference talks since 2003. Includes two graduate student invited talks and one keynote presentation. SERVICE COMMITTEE MEMBER - EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, Parks Advisory Committee. Appointed by Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. June 2017–present (Vice chair, April 2022–present). - SIERRA CLUB, West Contra Costa Chapter. Vice-chair, May 2020–May 2022. - El Cerrito Environmental Quality Committee (2017– present; Vice-chair, 2019–2020; Chair, 2020–2022). CO-FOUNDER - BACKYARD BIODIVERSITY PROJECT. 2016–present. - BAY AREA ANT GROUP (BAAG). 2007– present. EDITORIAL BOARDS: - BMC ECOLOGY. Associate Editor, 2011–present. - BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS. Associate Editor, 2011–present. - PLOS GENETICS. Guest Editor, 2013. - AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY. Associate Editor, 2007–2012. COMMITTEE MEMBER: - NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY NETWORK (NEON) DESIGN CONSORTIUM, Invasive Species subcommittee. 2004–2005. REVIEWER (manuscripts and grant proposals): Several hundred from 2003-present Journals, including: The American Naturalist, Animal Behaviour, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Behavioral Ecology, Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, Biology Letters, BMC Ecology, Conservation Biology, Diversity & Distributions, Ecological Entomology, Ecology, Ecology Letters, eLife, Evolution, Evolutionary Applications, Evolutionary Ecology Research, Genetics, Insectes Sociaux, Journal Chemical of Ecology, Naturwissenschaften, Molecular Ecology, Oecologia, PLoS One, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports. Funding agencies, including: The National Science Foundation, US Department of Agriculture, National Institute for Climate Change Research (US Dept of Energy), Natural Environment Research Council. SERVICE TO UC SYSTEM: Tsutsui, Neil D. Curriculum Vitae 4 Member – Faculty advisory committee, UC Education Abroad Program (UCEAP). 2013– present. SERVICE TO CAMPUS (past four years): Faculty Director – UC Berkeley Central Sierra Field Research Stations (includes Central Sierra Snow Lab, Sagehen Creek Field Station, Onion Creek Experimental Forest, Chickering-American River Reserve, and the North Fork Association Lands). July 2022–present. Member – UC BERKELEY, Hill Campus, Long Range Development Plan Committee, 2019–present. Member – Committee on Courses of Instruction (COCI). 2014–2018. SERVICE TO SCHOOL/COLLEGE (past four years): Member – Search Committee, Executive Director for UC Berkeley Institute for People, Parks, and Biodiversity. June 2022–present. Member – Search Committee, Executive Director for UC Berkeley Institute for People, Parks, and Biodiversity. Nov 2021–April 2022. Member – Executive Committee, Sept 2019–Oct. 2021. SERVICE TO THE DEPARTMENT (past four years): Member – Graduate Student Admission Committee, Organisms & the Environment. Fall 2022. Member – Student Endowment Allocation Committee. 2022–present. Chair – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) committee, Mentoring working group. 2020–2021. Member – DEI Committee. 2019–2021. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT the following individuals to the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee: 1. Najari Smith (District I) 2. Janet Berckefeldt (District II) 3. Germaine McCoy (District III) 4. Arlene Kikkawa-Nielsen (District IV) 5. Ben Miyaji (District V) 6. Nilofar Gardezi (non-profit foundation) 7. Margot Melcon (non-profit foundation) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Arts and Culture Commission of Contra Costa County (also known as AC5) was established in 1994 to advise the Board of Supervisors in matters and issues relevant to arts and culture; to advance the arts in a way that promotes communication, education, appreciation, and collaboration throughout Contra Costa County; to preserve, celebrate, and share the arts and culture of the many diverse ethnic groups who live in Contra Costa County; to create partnerships with business and government; and to increase communications and understanding between all citizens through art. Most importantly, the mission of the Commission was to promote arts and culture as a vital element in the quality of life for all citizens of Contra Costa County. While AC5’s work was instrumental in the development and support of numerous vital arts and culture programs and initiatives over the years, the organizational structure was ultimately deemed not as constructive to the mission as a public-private partnership Arts Council could be. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lara DeLaney, (925) 655-2057 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointments to the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On March 29, 2022, the Board of Supervisors dissolved the Arts and Culture Commission and directed County Administration staff to procure or establish a nonprofit public-private partnership Arts Council for the county, to serve as the county’s State-Local Partner (SLP) with the California Arts Council (CAC). On August 2, 2022, the Board of Supervisors referred to the Internal Operations (IO) Committee the establishment of an Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee. At its September 12, 2022 meeting, the Internal Operations (IO) Committee (Chair Burgis, Vice Chair Andersen) supported the establishment of a seven-member Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee and directed staff to commence an application period for applicants to the Committee. On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors voted to establish the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee and approved its mission and committee composition. The mission of the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee is to guide the County's arts and cultural planning efforts through an inclusive community engagement process; provide input and collaboration with County staff and the consultant on the Arts Council procurement or establishment process; ensure diversity, equity, and inclusion throughout the process and outcomes; and listen to the community. The Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee will consist of up to seven members, representing the geographic and demographic diversity of the county, including representatives from the following: Former Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commissioners and/or Managing Directors Representatives of County departments with interest in arts and culture Members of local arts and culture commissions/committees/foundations Artists and representatives of local arts and culture organizations Municipalities and Chambers of Commerce leaders School District Representatives and leaders of education Members of the LGBTQ+ community Black, Indigenous and People of Color On September 20, 2022, staff issued a Press Release (in English and Spanish) and distributed it along with a recruitment flyer (in English and Spanish) to recruit for the seven (7) seats on the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee. The Press Release and recruitment flyer were sent to local artists and arts and cultural organizations, through the communication networks and social media platforms maintained by the County Office of Communication and Media, via Board of Supervisors’ newsletters, and other relevant outreach mailing lists and social media platforms maintained by County staff. As of October 11, 2022, a total of 13 applications were received. All applicants were invited to participate in the public interviews with the Internal Operations Committee on October 17, 2022. In addition, on October 13, 2022, another application was received which was past the deadline of October 11. Staff from the Clerk of the Board's Office also notified County Administrator staff that another timely application was submitted by mail on October 1 but was not included in the original 13 applications due to misstatement of the name of the Committee that the applicant was applying for. At the October 17, 2022 IO Committee meeting, due to the issues with the late application, one timely application missing from the agenda packet, and the applicant pool not including any District 3 residents, the IO Committee directed staff to extend the recruitment period for at least another two weeks, encourage District 3 residents to apply, and bring the matter back to the IO Committee at its November meeting. After the October 17, 202 IO Committee meeting, staff released an updated press release and recruitment flyer (in both English and Spanish) through various channels of communication networks and social media platforms. As of the deadline of November 11, 2022, a total number of 22 applications were received. All applicants were invited to participate in the meeting with the IO Committee on November 21, 2022. At their November 21, 2022 Internal Operations Committee meeting, the Committee had considered the applications, interviewed applicants, and recommended that the Board of Supervisors appoint the following individuals to the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee: 1. Najari Smith (District I) 2. Janet Berckefeldt (District II) 3. Germaine McCoy (District III) 4. Arlene Kikkawa-Nielsen (District IV) 5. Ben Miyaji (District 5) 6. Nilofar Gardezi (non-profit foundation) 7. Margot Melcon (non-profit foundation) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to appoint members to the Arts Council Steering Committee is likely to reduce public participation in providing guidance to the County's arts and cultural planning efforts, in providing input and collaboration with County staff and Arts Orange County on the Arts Council procurement or establishment process; and in ensuring diversity, equity, and inclusion throughout the process and outcomes. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee Applications Attachment B – Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee Applications Summary Page 1 of 90Attachment A Page 2 of 90Attachment A Page 3 of 90Attachment A Page 4 of 90Attachment A Page 5 of 90Attachment A Page 6 of 90Attachment A Page 7 of 90Attachment A Page 8 of 90Attachment A Page 9 of 90Attachment A Page 10 of 90Attachment A Page 11 of 90Attachment A Page 12 of 90Attachment A Page 13 of 90Attachment A Page 14 of 90Attachment A Page 15 of 90Attachment A Please return completed applications to: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Martinez, CA 94553 or email to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Contra Costa County Home Address - Street City Code P hone (best number to reach you)Email Resident of Supervisorial District BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION G.E.D. Certifi Yes No Course of Study/Major Degree AwardedColleges or Universities Attended High School Diploma CA High School Proficiency Certificate EDUCATION Yes Yes Yes Yes Please check one: If s, how many? No Seat Name Yes No Y No No Page 16 of 90 Attachment A Yes No Please check one: Yes No f Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the county, such as grants, contracts, or Do you have a familial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to or Resolution o. 20 /) Please check one: Yes No f Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please check one: Page 17 of 90 Attachment A Submit this application to:Clerk of the Board 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 7.As indicated in Board Resolution 20 /, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors member in any of the following relationships: 1.This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. Important Information Questions about this application? Contact the Clerk of the Board at (925) or by email at ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us Signed: Date: I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements and/or ommissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. Leonardo Ding Page 18 of 90 Attachment A Leonardo (Leo) Ding | EDUCATION Miramonte High School | Orinda, CA Fall 2020 – Present ●Completing coursework on advanced levels, including AP Calculus BC, AP Computer Science, AP Statistics, and AP Biology; completed AP Calculus AB, AP European History, AP Mandarin; Weighted GPA: 4.36/4; Unweighted GPA: 3.93/4 ●Varsity Congress and Public Forum Debate Team; providing leadership and help to younger members; drafting Congress bills and lecturing in class as Congress Captain ●Part of the Curriculum Consulting Team to promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in school’s curriculum design; worked closely with school admin and teachers to make and change lessons to be more equitable for all. LEADERSHIP/EXTRACURRICULARS Boy Scouts Troop 237, Senior Patrol Leader | Orinda, CA May 2021-May 2022 ●The highest-ranking leader of over 100 scouts in a troop with more than 60 years of history; https://www.troopwebhost.org/Troop237Orinda/Index.htm ●Planned and organized all weekly troop meetings, delegated tasks to other members of the leadership, provided mentorship to young scouts looking to advance, and worked with board of adult leaders for event planning involving more than 300 scouts in the community California Association of Student Councils (CASC), Communications Director, Region 4 |CA July 2022 - present ●Delegate for CASC conferences, where students draft and present legislation to district board members and state senators to address social advocacy topics and learn how to create meaningful change in their communities. ●Leads all communications for the region spanning most of the Bay Area, including all social media posts, meeting organization, and advocacy to schools. Stop Asian Hate Youth Campaign (SAHYC),https://linktr.ee/stopaapihateyc,Intern |CA Aug 2022 - present ●Research and advocacy for expanding the curriculum in the Ethnic Studies class. Gladstone Institutes UCSF, Intern| San Francisco, CA June 2022 - August 2022 ●Used a programming approach to test a drug’s effectiveness in treating Alzheimer’s Disease patients. Presented findings to the lab and developed a pipeline for members to use in future projects. CodeToWin,Teaching Assistant March 2022 - present COMMUNITY SERVICE ●Xenophon Therapeutic Riding Center, Video Production Feb 2022-present Support the non-profit organization that helps children with autism/ADHD and veterans/seniors. Filmed and edited films that were presented in the center’s annual gala to over 100 guests and will be used for promoting its programs. ●Aegis Living,https://www.aegisliving.com/Senior Memory Care Volunteer Aug 2022- present Provides care to patients with severe dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, hosts activities for residents to enjoy. ●Orinda Intermediate School, Debate Coach Dec 2021- present ●Miramonte High School,Media Production Team Aug 2022- present Photographer (Instagram content provider) for Mats Football and Mats Water Polo HONORS/AWARDS Awards Fall 2021 - Present ●Finalist at the American Protégé International Piano & Strings Competition 2021 and invited to play solo piano in the Carnegie Hall in New York ●First Place in the Senate (Varsity) Division of the Golden Gate Speech Association (GGSA) Congressional debate tournament (Sep 2021); Semifinalist at GGSA State Qualifiers (Mar 2022); Undefeated Debater in the GGSA Policy Public Forum Tournament (Oct 2022)http://www.ggsa.org/ SKILLS & INTERESTS Foreign Language: Fluent Mandarin speaker Interests: politics, biology, arts, international traveler, outdoor adventurer, and avid photographer Page 19 of 90 Attachment A Resume JOAN D'ONOFRIO Concord, CA 94518 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSIGNMENTS 2014 to present ROTARY INTERNATIONAL Concord CA Newsletter Editor, Secretary of the Board of Directors, Rotarian of the Year 2020 Serve as newsletter editor for the Rotary Club of Clayton Valley/Concord and was awarded the "2020 Rotarian of the Year" award 2008 to present MICHELANGELO D'ONOFRIO ARTS FOUNDATION Concord CA Founder & President Established a 501 c3 nonproflf charitable foundation devoted to presenting monetary awards and scholarships to students in K-12 public schools who demonstrate outstanding talents in the visual and digital arts throughout the world and distribute Art in a Boxpainting supplies to unsheltered students 2008 to 2022 H&R BLOCK, INC. Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Clayton, Pleasant Hill CA Customer Service Professional I Office Marketing Coordinator Serviced clients in accordance with company guidelines and policies, ensured seamless client satisfaction, coordinated tax preparers' skill-levels with client needs, assisted marketing manager with program preparations, and implemented local marketing programs 2018. 2021 ARTS & CULTURAL COMMISSION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Martinez CA Commissioner Appointed to the Commission by the California Arts Council and Board of Supervisors to promote, grow, and advance the arts in Contra Costa County by growing, promoting, educating, and preserving diverse cultural expression 2017-2018 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Martinez CA 2016 -2017 Member of the Civil Grand Jury Served two one-year terms as a juror for the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury 2002 -2008 CURVES FOR WOMEN Piedmont, Walnut Creek, Alamo, Danville CA Franchise Owner Owned four Curves fitness clubs; trained and managed over 35 staff hires; managed day-to-day operations; conducted classes on fitness, nutrition, and diet; worked one-on-one with members that ranged in age from 18 to 87; published a book of club member anecdotesr . grewmembershi,ofrom 200 to 6,000;' createdal/ marketing and advertising promotions; and served on the East Bay Curves' Co-op Board 1989 -2002 EMC PUBLISHING, INC. St Paul MN Art Director I Production Manager I Marketing Design Coordinator Implemented and executed the creative process of all printed materials and ancillary products; managed in- house staff; supervised free-lance designers; contracted with off-site design services that specialized in educational books, electronic packaging products; business training and basic skills publications 1973. 1989 OCEANA PUBLICATIONS, INC. (Oxford University Press) New York NY Vice President I Managing Editor I Production Manager I Purchasing Agent I Art Director/ International Project Coordinator I Technical Writer Responsible for all aspects of legal text publishing; managed the editorial, art, production, and marketing departments; developed and was responsible for departmental budgets; founded and implemented student internship programs; headed team-driven employee incentive programs; produced New York University's Annual Law Review publication; organize<! conventions and seminars in London, Rome, and Beijing Education PRATT INSTITUTE Brooklyn NY BFA NEW YORK UNIVERSITY New.York NY Publication Certification Page 23 of 90 Attachment A References MEL HECKER Publications Officer: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Washington DC STEVE WEIR Chair, of the Rotary Club of Clayton Valley/Concord Charitable Fund Former Mayor of Concord Former Board of Elections Clerk-Recorder Concord CA SUZANNE BRAGDON District Governor of 5160 Rotary · International Concord CA Page 24 of 90 Attachment A Page 25 of 90Attachment A Page 26 of 90Attachment A Page 27 of 90Attachment A Page 28 of 90Attachment A Page 29 of 90Attachment A Page 30 of 90Attachment A Page 31 of 90Attachment A Page 32 of 90Attachment A Page 33 of 90Attachment A Page 34 of 90Attachment A Page 35 of 90Attachment A Page 36 of 90Attachment A Page 37 of 90Attachment A Page 38 of 90Attachment A Page 39 of 90Attachment A Page 40 of 90Attachment A Page 41 of 90Attachment A Page 42 of 90Attachment A Page 43 of 90Attachment A Page 44 of 90Attachment A Page 45 of 90Attachment A Page 46 of 90Attachment A Page 47 of 90Attachment A Page 48 of 90Attachment A Page 49 of 90Attachment A Page 50 of 90Attachment A Page 51 of 90Attachment A Page 52 of 90Attachment A Page 53 of 90Attachment A Page 54 of 90Attachment A Page 55 of 90Attachment A Page 56 of 90Attachment A Page 57 of 90Attachment A Page 58 of 90Attachment A Page 59 of 90Attachment A Page 60 of 90Attachment A Page 61 of 90Attachment A Page 62 of 90Attachment A Page 63 of 90Attachment A Page 64 of 90Attachment A Page 65 of 90Attachment A Page 66 of 90Attachment A Page 67 of 90Attachment A Page 68 of 90Attachment A Page 69 of 90Attachment A Page 70 of 90Attachment A Page 71 of 90Attachment A Page 72 of 90Attachment A Page 73 of 90Attachment A Page 74 of 90Attachment A Page 75 of 90Attachment A Page 76 of 90Attachment A Page 77 of 90Attachment A Page 78 of 90Attachment A Page 79 of 90Attachment A Page 80 of 90Attachment A Page 81 of 90Attachment A Page 82 of 90Attachment A Page 83 of 90Attachment A Page 84 of 90Attachment A Page 85 of 90 Attachment A Page 86 of 90 Attachment A Page 87 of 90 Attachment A Page 88 of 90 Attachment A Page 89 of 90 Attachment A Page 90 of 90 Attachment A Applicants for the Ad Hoc Arts Council Steering Committee Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 1 Janet Berckefeldt 2 Lafayette University of Southern California, MA Public Administration; University of Redlands, BA Government Maybeck Foundation 2 Board of Trustees, University of Redlands, Redlands, CA; Board of Directors, John Muir Land Trust, Martinez, CA; Board of Directors, Museum of the San Ramon Valley, Danville My career in non-profit arts and culture organizations has spanned more than 50 years. More than half of that time has been in public- private partnerships for museums, historic preservation, and wildlife conservation organizataions. I have served on several theater and museum boards of directors. As a consultant, I have worked with theaters, museums, and other arts and culture organizations. I am a descendant of pioneer ranching families in Danville (Baldwin) and San Ramon (Cox) and am committed to ensuring that Contra Costa County is a vibrant and healthy place to live. 2 Marija Bleier 2 Danville UC Santa Cruz, BA Art History Town of Danville, Visual Arts Coordinator 2 SRVUSD (San Ramon Valley Unified School District), Contra Costa Midrasha I am very interested in helping foster arts in my community, and serving on a steering committee for the Arts for the County would be a postive way to contribute. I have a robust background in the arts and know a lot of artists in Contra Costa and surounding Bay Area communities. I have served on the arts advisory board in the past (Arts and Culture Commission of Contra Costa County). Aadditionally, I am a member of NorCalPaan (Northern California Public Art Administrators Network) and work in the arts for the Town of Danville as the Visual Arts Coordiantor. I have also volunteered as an arts judge for SRVUSD art competitions. 3 Kristen Cumings 5 Pittsburg Wheaton College, Wheaton Illinois, BFA/French Horn performance Self Employed/Cumings Consulting 5 I have working with Pittsburg Arts and Community Foundation since 2012 in both volunteer and paid positions, as an instructor, program supervisor, and grant writer. I have also volunteered for other non arts- related organizations such as food banks, schools, and local businesses. I would like to serve on the steering committee for our county as we work together to develop a cohesive plan for the arts, because I believe the arts are necessary in order for people to experience the full spectrum of human existence, and the more people who have access to the opportunity to participate in the arts on every level, the better all of our lives will be in Contra Costa County. I am a working visual artist who has lived in Contra Costa county for the past 25 years. I started building my art career in 2009 while living in Martinez, as artist in residence for Jelly Belly Candy Company. Since 2009, I've made over 100 large scale works for Jelly Belly at events around the U.S. and the world, as well as numerous private commissions and a large body of work in various other visual media. Since moving to Pittsburg in 2012, I have become involved with Pittsburg Arts and Community Foundation. I am interested in scaling up my own involvement in support of the arts, and I would bring a grassroots experiential perspective of being a working artist in the county for the past 25 years to the committee if selected. Page 1 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 4 Leonardo Ding 2 Orinda Miramonte High School student NA Boy Scouts Troup 237, California Association of Student Councils, Stop Asian Hate Youth Campaign, Xenophon Therapeutic Riding Center, Aegis Living (Senior Memory Care Volunteer), Debate Coach at Orinda Intermediate School, Media Production Team at Miramonte High School Serving on the Steering Committee is of interest to me because of my passion for the arts and my desire to make it more accessible. I wouldn't say I'm the best drawer or painter, but I've been involved with the arts ever since I could remember. I play the piano, perming at many venues, including the Baroque Festival of the Contra Costa branch, and am heavily invested in photography and videography. I am lucky to be a part of a community that supports the arts, and envision similar programs across the county. The arts have allowed me to see the world differently; seeing things through a different lense have nurtured my creativity and critical thinking skills. As a county, thre are crucial aspects of the community that need more emphasis. While I am only in high school, I believe I can bring a new perspective to the committee, one from a younger generation. The creation of an arts council should include programs for the youth, and my past experiences working with kids of all ages has given me knowledge on how to encourage participation and develop activities that kids enjoy. In addition to supporting youth, I hope to assist the Arts Council to help local artists get public attention and recognition. My upbringing and school has led me to appreciate many cultures, and as a person of color myself, one of my main goals if appointed is to ensure access to all and to be active in receiving feedback from the community. 5 Joan D'Onofrio 4 Concord Pratt Institute, BFA MICHELANGELO D'ONOFRIO ARTS FOUNDATION, Founder & President; N/A ART IN A BOX: I am currenlty assembling art supplies in boxes to be distributed to unhouse/unsheltered/homeless students in grads one through 12 in the Mt Diablo Unified School District. I edit and publish the weekly Clayton Valley/Concord Rotary newsletter. I am also an award winning graphic designer, painter and illustrator. I consider serving on this particular committee due to unfinished business with the Arts and Culture Commission. My resume listed my employment history as follows: 2014 to present: Rotary International, Newsletter Editor, Secretary of the Board of Directors, Rotarian of the Year 2020; 2008 to present, MICHELANGELO D'ONOFRIO ARTS FOUNDATION, Founder & President; 2008 to 2022: H&R Block, Inc. Customer Service Professional/Office Marketing Coordinator; 2018-2021: Arts and Culture Commission of Contra Costa County, Commissioner; 2017- 2018 and 2016-2017: Superior Court of the State of California, Memeber of the Civil Grand Jury; 2002-2008: Curves for Women, Franchise Owner; 1989-2002: EMC Publishing, Inc, Art Director/Production Manager/Marketing Design Coordinator; 1973- 1989: Oceana Publications, Inc. Vice President/Managing Editor 6 Nilofar Gardezi N/A Yale College, B.A. African American Studies; UC Berkley, Ph.D. English Dean & Margaret Lesher Foundation, Program Officer & Grants Manager 4 As the Arts & Culture Program Officer at the Dean & Margaret Lesher Foundation, I am committed to supporting the development of a more equitable, diverse, and representative Arts Council for all of Contra Costa County. The Lesher Foundation will support the process for creating the Arts Council and I am applying to the steering committee to remain engaged and uphold our strong commitment. Page 2 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 7 Arlene Kikkawa-Nielsen 4 Clayton Mt. San Antonio College, Associate of Science - Liberal Arts Studies; Mt. San Antonio College, Associate of Arts - Design Curves Health and Fitness Center, Circuit Coach 4 Clayton Community Library Foundation, Creekside Artists Guild; Diablo Taiko Drumming; Jsei, Diablo JA Religious and Cultural Center & Club; Cancer Support Community; NorCal Gagaku; Diablo Valley Hui O’Aloha To further expand over 25 years of diverse experience providing service in the public, private, non-profit, and health related sectors towards a career that utilizes my collaborative, organizational and project managerial skills to benefit and enrich communities. 8 Tari Loring 4 Walnut Creek Chapman University, Performing Arts Major/Business Minor Local Edition Creative 4 Currently serve as the Secretary & Treasurer as well as the COO for a nonprofit arts organization, Three Thirty Three Arts. As a resident of Contra Costa County for 10 years and as a business owner of a public art & creative placemaking company, I've witnessed the lack of public arts & culture investment in many areas of the County. Through my business, we're making a concentated effort to change that by adding more diverse public artworks to cities that don't have much publi art and also by building cultural experiences that igninte inspiration & excitement in our county. I'm well-versed in creating strategies for public arts projects that are realistic for each unique setting. I've also co- founded a nonprofit arts organization that focuses on providing artists opportunities to build their experience with public art and directly work on projects that benefit the community. 9 Christy Mack 2 Lafayette University of Iowa, BA Chemistry Bess Brand Studio LLC, Studio Founder N/A Art Committee (Member, 2022 - present); Art Moves Project (Past President/Board, 2016 - present); Lamorinda Arts Council (Board, 2017 - 2018); 100 Plus Women Who Care Contra Costa County (Founding Member/Grant Maker, 2016 - present); Lafayette Juniors (Past President/Board 2012 - 2018); San Luis Obispo Children's Museum (Board, 2008 - 2010); San Luis Obispo County Community Foundation + Women's Legacy Fund (Founding Member/Grant Maker 2009 - Present) I have lived in Contra Costa County for 12 years and want to help define the future of arts and culture here. I have seen firsthand the benefits of collaborative planning and the positive outcomes of establishing arts councils. I welcome the opportunity to work in partnership to ensure accessible, diverse arts and culture experiences for everyone who lives in, works in, or visits Contra Costa County. have contributed to the arts and culture sector for almost 15 years as a City public art committee member, arts non- profit co-founder, arts council board member, museum board member, consultant, and grant maker. I have also served on non- profit boards, issuing $1M in grants to facilitate the creation of more equitable communities. 10 Wyatt Mathews 4 Pleasant Hill Diablo Valley College, Art; Sacramento State University, Art (Ceramics) Claypeople, Business Manager 1 I have been a long time resident of Contra costa county and a member of the art community for that last decade or so. I believe I posess a signifiant amount of knowledge on art with a specifica conentration is ceramics. As well as good understanding of the costs and of arts programs in the area. I have worked and currently work for art and community centered buisness in the East bay. I have worked in art full time for the last 12 years or so. I have managed several groups and hundreads of people both in the east bay and at Sacramento State. I have managed art studios and currently mannage an art supply store that gives a lot back to the local ceramics community. Page 3 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 11 Germaine McCoy 3 Brentwood University of Neada- Reno, BA/Criminal Justice; SFSU, MA/Behaviorial and Women's Studies Retired N/A I am interested in working with others toward a common goal of beautifying our shared environment through cultural arts. This is also an opportunity to expose myself to and learn from local artists and cultural organizations within the county. I have no specfic education or experience within the field of Arts. However, I have worked as an adult probation officer over 20 years for the City and County of San Francisco. I understand working through process in order to achieve a specific end. I have learned how to work within large diverse groups of people, problem solve, manage expectations and outcomes, to advocate and listen. In my opinion, these are great skills to have when working with various organizations in an effort to reach planned goals/outcomes, and I would greatly appreciate an opportunity to use these skills within this committee. 12 Alison McKee 4 Concord San Jose State University, Master of Library and Information Science; San Francisco Conservotary of Music, Bachelor's of Music Performance; Indiana University, Bachelor's of Music Performance Contra Costa County, County Librarian 5 Economic Opportunity Council I am an art and music lover and I am especially interested in the cross section of the arts and public libraries. I am the County Librarian for Contra Costa County and I have a music degree and worked as a musician for professionally for 10 years prior to moving on to a different career. 13 John Meehan 5 Martinez Diablo Valley Collee, Music BD Performing Arts 5 While I have been an active designer and educator for The Blue Devils (BD Performing Arts) in the Contra Costa area for almost 30 years, it was only recently I moved into a role where I oversee all of our community programs (Director of Community Arts Programs). This past year has been a lot of learning, and starting to network and engage in our community in ways we haven't before. I have a deep understanding of the arts (primarily music), and am extremely motivated to find new ways to engage our non-profit into our community as much as possible, and help our community thrive with the arts in general. I have performed clinics as well as arranged and composed music for groups around the United States and World. I've also coordinated and performed in many ensembles (including Niner Noise, the Warriors half-time band, for a Super Bowl, and on the soundtrack to Monsters University). In 2019, I was inducted into the Drum Corps International Hall of Fame, and am also an inductee of the World Drum Corps Hall of Fame. Page 4 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 14 Margot Melcon N/A San Francisco CSU Chico, BA Theater Arts Zellerbach Family Foundation N/A Too numerous to name, but all arts and culture related. Margot Melcon (she/her) joined the Zellerbach Family Foundation six years ago and manages their arts and culture grantmaking portfolio, including the Community Arts program, where she works to create an equitable, responsive, and accessible relationship in community with Bay Area artists. Prior to joining the foundation, she worked with nonprofit arts organizations for 20 years as a dramaturg, producer, and arts administrator,. She is also a published and produced playwright (of Miss Bennet, The Wickhams, and Georgiana and Kitty, co-written with Lauren Gunderson). She is also, importantly, a parent. 15 Ben Miyaji 5 Pittsburg Allan Hancock Community College, General; University of Maryland, History; Evergreen Valley College, General N/A Children's Musical Theater of San Jose Board of Directors; San Jose Arts Commission - Chair; Palo Alto Public Art Commission - Chair; Numerous California Arts Council/Silicon Valley Creates/San Jose Arts Commission grant panels; Numerous selection panels for public art projects in Bay Area counties The arts are a very important part of our lives. Conta Costa County deserves an arts organization that can bridge the gap between the residents and county arts groups that will bring quality arts programming to the county. The Steering Committee is a significant step in bringing needed cohesino to the county arts organizations. I believe my experience serving on the San Jose Arts Commission (over 20 years), Palo Alto Public Art Commission (since 2013) and the Arts and Culture Commission of Contra Costa County give me a unique view on commissions/councils. Also my serving on numerous grants panels on the local and state level also give me insight into the inner workings of arts organizations. 16 Sharon Mossman 3 Oakley Rose State College, Associate of Science; University of San Francisco, Bachelor of Science Kith & Kin Studio of Fine Art 3 While serving on the Antioch Art Commission, I organized a Christmas Gala for the city of Antioch which included getting the store owners to decorate their stores, a roaming group of carolers to sing in various locations, and a decorated, horse- drawn carriage to transport visitors around the city. I also volunteered as an art teacher in the elementary school system in Antioch. 17 John Nakanishi 4 Pleasant Hill Hartford Art School, Fine Arts Major; College of San Mateo, Chemistry; UC Berkeley, Chenical Engineering Retired N/A Concord Art Association Boardmember and President; Past session Member, Walnut Creek Presbyterian Church; Past Boardmember Pleasant Hill Martinez Soccer Association; Past Volunteer Art Teacher (Sequoia Elementary School, Monument Crisis Center, Wren Avenue Elementary School PTA); Columnist for the Clayton Concord Pioneer newspaper (Arts in Motion) I believe Contra Costa County needs a strong and vibrant arts council to bring art to the community. I would like to be a part of the process to develop this arts council in order to enrich the creative lives of local artists and county residents. My experience as president of the Concord Arts Association has provided me with a view of the arts community in and around the Concord area. I can also provide perspective based on my Japanese-American heritage. Page 5 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 18 Charles Phalen 5 Martinez DVC, Music/Drama; SF State, Music/Recording Industry Retired N/A Though I do not live in District 3, I am presently the Technical Director and board members for Ghostlight Theatre Ensemble in Brentwood. I would be pleased to represent east county. 19 Joel Roster 5 Martinez Diablo Valley College, Theater Arts Executive Director, El Campanil Theater 5 Board Of Directors for the Chamber of Commerce, City Of Antioch Chairperson of Nonprofit Arts Committee, Chamber of Commerce, City of Antioch 20+ years of various events, fundraisers, and mixers for various organizations in Contra Costa County I have been involved in arts administration and arts education since 2002. I re-built the Diablo Valley College "College For Kids" theatre program, and was recruited by Town Hall Theatre in Lafayette to help build their education program. After serving as a Teaching Artist for a few years, I was promoted to Director of Education for Town Hall Theatre, and restructured their entire program, renaming it to "Town Hall Education" and seeking qualified teaching artists to give their students a fully professional experience. I directed over 40 productions for young artists, and was then promoted to become Town Hall's Artistic Director. Over my tenure, Town Hall Theatre received more awards for their productions than any period in their 90-year history. I then served at Berkeley Playhouse for their educational programs, and in 2019 was invited to interview to become the Theatre Manager for El Campanil Theatre in Antioch. I steered the company through the pandemic, innovating new entertainment options, and in 2021 was promoted to become the foundation's Executive Director. Since the fall of 2020, I have secured over $500,000 in grants for El Campanil, and I currently oversee a staff of 50+ employees. 20 Najari Smith 1 Richmond NYC College of Technology, Graphic Art & Media; School of the Visual Arts, Bachelors of Fine Art Rich City RIDES, Founder/Executive Director 1 Human Rights and Human Relations Commission, Commissioner; Our Power Richmond Coalition; Climate Justice Alliance; Sustainability Comm.; Richmond Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Richmond Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee;The City of Richmond, Arts & Culture Commission In 2014, I served as an Arts and Culture Commissioner for the City of Richmond. Najari is chair emeritus and long time member of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee for the City of Richmond. Najari is the founding executive director of Rich City Rides. In 2014, 2-years after founding Rich City Rides, Najari co- founded the Rich City Rides Bike Skate Shop Cooperative, a Black Worker-owned cooperative for-profit business. Najari is a former member of the Sustainability Committee for Seed Commons. Najari is a founding steering committee member of Cooperation Richmond. Cooperation Richmond builds community-controlled wealth through worker-owned and community-owned cooperative businesses and enterprises by and for low-income communities and communities of color in Richmond whose wealth has been extracted. Page 6 of 7 Attachment B Name Resident District City Education Current Employer Employment District Volunteer/Activity/Affiliation Experience/Interest 21 Terri Tobey 2 Walnut Creek Washington University, BA - Performing Arts; Webster University, MAT - Teaching; Webster University, MA - Gerontology Diablo Valley Foundation Aging, Volunteer Manager all Started a nonprofit for women in Colorado; subcontracted with Department of Senior Affairs, Albuquerque, NM; "brain games" including arts projects with participants of 9 senior centers I'm an LGBTQ senior artist, and a member of he Rossmoor Art Assoication, and hve shown my work in juried exhibitions. I've devoted my professional life as a Gerontologist to help seniors optimize their lives, and I strongly believe creativity (arts) is a central element of that work. I've been involved in community organizations in CO, CA, NM and worked collaboratively with nonprofits, government agencies, and corporations in the healthcare field. My passion is offering creative outlets to seniors at home and in facilities to improve their well- being. I have presented at Senior Centers, local and statewide and national aging conferences. 22 Randall Wight 5 Martinez California State East Bay, Bachelor of Science E5 Management 4 Martinez Unified School District Advisory Board; Martinez Campbell Theater Advisory Board, Special Events I would like to provide a perspective that would allow the committee to have a broader and more diverse view of what may be considered as an art form and venues that play host to those art forms. As an advisory member of a local non-profit that works with both educational and performance art forms, it may serve the committee's stated charge. Stand up Comedy, Commnity Theater, Long and Short Form Improv, Accomplished Speaker (Toastmasters), Corporate Facilitator, Author, Inventor Currently - General Manager Act II impro Special Events Coordinator - Martinez Campbell Theater Chief Justing Officer/Producer - Funny Bone Productions Page 7 of 7 Attachment B RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. 005023 authorizing the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $321,999 from Behavioral Health Admin (0467) to General Services - Fleet Operations (0064) for the purchase of ten (10) vehicles for transportation of A3 (Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime) clients. FISCAL IMPACT: This action increases appropriations in the Fleet Internal Service Fund (0064) and reduces appropriations in Behavioral Health Admin (0467) by $321,999. Allocation adjustments through a T/C 24 will facilitate the fund transfer to the proper disbursement account. The purchase of these vehicles will be 100% funded by the California Department of Health Care Services. BACKGROUND: The Crisis Care Mobile Units Program grant and the Measure X half cent sales tax funded 75 positions to staff the A3 (Anyone, Anywhere, Anytime) Behavioral Health Crisis Response Program that will serve the entire County. This funding includes the use of County vehicles. The vehicles will be used by our Mobile Crisis Response Teams (Mental Health Specialists, Community Support Workers, and Substance Use Counselors) to respond in the community to provide services to individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis. The Mobile Crisis Response Teams will assess clients onsite, stabilize the situation, or initiate an involuntary hold. In addition to using the vehicle to meet people in the field, it will be used to transport clients, as needed, to appropriate destinations, so that they receive the right care at the right time. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If a vehicle is not available BHS will not be meeting the requirements of the funding sources. Additionally, the Mobile Crisis Response Teams will not be able to meet a primary goal of the A3 Model, which is to respond in the field and onsite to provide necessary interventions/services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Chad Pierce, (510) 414-6460 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Ten Vehicles for Behavioral Health Services Administration AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Approp Adj C.29_5023 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26014 to reclassify position #14106 and its incumbent from the classification of Systems Accountant II (LWVB) (represented) at salary plan and grade level ZB5-1787 ($8,347 - $11,186) to Information Systems Project Manager (LPNA) (represented) at salary plan and grade level ZA5- 1884 ($9,189 – 12,314) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller Systems Division. FISCAL IMPACT: Annual cost of this action will be approximately $18,000, including pension costs of approximately $3,600 (100% General Fund). BACKGROUND: The Office of the Auditor-Controller Systems Division provides support to Departmental staff and ensures security of various internal Finance Systems. The Department is currently updating the Finance System and plans on updating various other systems over the next several years, which will require an Information Systems Project Manager to analyze, manage, coordinate, and implement IT projects in a timely and efficient manner. A classification study APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Harjit Nahal, (925) 608-9300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: sylvia wong tam, Haj Nahal C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Reclassify Systems Accountant II in the Office of the Auditor-Controller BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) was conducted on a single position currently allocated to the Systems Accountant II classification assigned to the Office of the Auditor-Controller Systems Division. Since 2019, the incumbent has taken on responsibilities as the County Project Lead for the implementation and support of the new County-wide Workday Financials ERP system. Additionally, the position scope includes project management, supervision, systems analysis, testing and configuration, and training and development. This work is most aligned with the Information Systems Project Manager, which is responsible for this scope of work. Upon review and analysis, Human Resources recommends the position and its incumbent be reclassified to Information Systems Project Manager. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A Systems Project Manager position is essential to the efficient operation for the Department. If this position is not approved, the Office of the Auditor Controller will not be able to adequately manage its Systems upgrades and Information Technology needs which will negatively impact the implementation and operation of future systems. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS PDQ P300_26014 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26014 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26014 DATE 8/24/2022 Department No./ Department Auditor-Controller Budget Unit No. 0010 Org No. 1013 Agency No. A10 Action Requested: Reclassify position #14106 and its incumbent from Systems Accountant II (LWVB) to Information Systems Project Manager (LPNA). Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $18,264.00 Net County Cost $18,264.00 Total this FY $18,264.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT N.C.C. this FY 100% General Fund $18,264.00 Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Harjit Nahal, Asst Auditor Controller ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT L.Strobel 8/24/2022 _ _ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/17/2022 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26014 to reclassify position #14106 and its incumbent from Systems Accountant II (LWVB) (represented) at salary plan and grade level ZB5-1787 ($8,347 - $11,186) to Information Systems Project Manager (LPNA) (represented) at salary plan and grade level ZA5- 1884 ($9,188 – 12,314) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller Systems Division. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Nancy Phetdaravanh _ 11/17/2022 (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: _ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 x 11/01/2022 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26068 to add one (1) Sheriff's Chief of Management Services - Exempt (APD2) at salary plan and grade B85 2057 ($10,899 - $13,248). FISCAL IMPACT: 100% General Fund: Annual estimated cost total $275,000, of which $52,000 is pension costs. This cost will be absorbed within the Sheriff's existing budget. BACKGROUND: In August 2022, the current Commander-Exempt in Management Services informed the Sheriff of her intent to retire in February 2023. The Sheriff is requesting the addition of a Chief of Management Services-Exempt position in an effort to allow time for recruitment, hiring, and knowledge transfer to take place before the upcoming retirement. The Commander position will be canceled at a future date. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There would not be adequate time to recruit, hire, and allow for knowledge transfer if the Sheriff's Chief of Management Services - Exempt position is not added before the Commander - Exempt incumbent retires. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mary Jane Robb, 925-655-0005 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Sylvia Wong Tam C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Sheriff's Chief of Management Services position AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No.26068 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26066 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26068 DATE Department No./ Department Office of the Sheriff Budget Unit No. 0255 Org No. 2500 Agenc y No. 25 Action Requested: Add one (1) Sheriff's Chief of Management Services - Exempt (APD2) at salary plan and grade B85-2057 ($10,899.25 - $13,247.11). Proposed Effective Date: 11/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $293,948.00 Net County Cost Total this FY $171,470.00 N.C.C. this FY SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Cancelation of Commander position at a future date. Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Mary Jane Robb ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT P. Reyes) 11/1/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/4/2022 Add one (1) Sheriff's Chief of Management Services - Exempt (APD2) at salary plan and grade B85 -2057 ($10,899.25 - $13,247.11). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Alycia Leach 11/4/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26059 to cancel three (3) vacant Environmental Health Specialist II (VLVA) positions at salary plan and grade TC5-1759 ($8,119 - $9,869), and add three (3) Environmental Health Specialist III (VLNB) positions at salary plan and grade TC5-1001 ($8,525 - $10,362) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this request will have an approximate annual cost increase of $27,014, with $6,888 in pension cost included. The cost increase will be fully offset by Environmental Health Program Fees. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Environmental Health Services (EHS) division is charged to protect and promote the health of County residents through programs for safe food, water for drinking and recreation, and the sanitary management of wastes. It serves as a regulatory agency that provides oversight for businesses and property owners and a community resource for the general public. In order to meet the needs of the community and enforce new legislation and ordinances, EHS is requesting to cancel three Environmental Health Specialist II positions and add three Environmental Health Specialist III positions. Since County ordinances and new legislation constantly affect the duties and responsibilities of the EHS Program, there is a current need for additional registered Environmental Health Specialist III positions in the Retail Food program. These positions will be responsible for, but not limited to, developing and writing policies and procedures for program implementation, analyzing and evaluating the effect of proposed legislation, writing proposals for available grants, and conducting extremely complex and difficult investigations. The Environmental Health Specialist II positions are currently vacant and no longer needed in the division at this time. Adding the three additional Environmental Health Specialist III positions will allow EHS to continue to provide optimal service to County residents. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larita Clow, (925) 957-5244 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larita Clow, Jo-Anne Linares, Kathi Caudel, Monica LaFleur, Jocelyn Stortz, Linh Huynh, Parna Kamyabfar, Sandra Sosa-Morales C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancel three Environmental Health Specialist II positions and add three Environmental Health Specialist III positions in the Health Services Dept CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Department will not have an adequate staffing structure for environmental health professionals, which may lead to non-compliance of regulatory standards and adversely impact the heath and safety of County residents. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 26059 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26059 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26059 DATE 10/20/2022 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0452 Org No. 5886 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Cancel three (3) Environmental Health Specialist II (VLVA) positions and add three (3) Environmental Health Specialist III (VLNB) positions in the Health Services Department. (Represented) Proposed Effective Date: 11/1/2022 Classification Quest ionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary ) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjus tment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $27,014.00 Net County Cos t $0.00 Total this FY $18,009.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSE T ADJUSTMENT: (100% Environmental Health Program Fees ) Department must initiate necessary adjustment a nd s ubmit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or com ments. Larita Clow ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RE SOURCES DEPARTMENT Sarah Kennard for 10/21/22 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Am end Resolution 71/17 est ablishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RE COMMENDATION: DATE 11/1/2022 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Res ources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Dat e _______ No. xxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s ) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding fo r a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have cons idered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analy sis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date t hat your cost / benefit analy sis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examinat ion(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current j ob 2. Non-County employ ee Provide a justification if filling position(s ) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NE CESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26064 to add one (1) Clerk-Recorder Services Specialist (EATA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade 3R5-1269 ($4,998.18-$6075.32), and cancel one (1) vacant Clerk-Specialist Level (JWXD) (represented) position number 11957 salary plan 3RX-1156 ($4,457.54-$5,692.46) in the Clerk-Recorder Department. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% County General Fund. The total cost of this request will be $4,594 annually and $2,680 in this fiscal year, these costs are within the department's operating budget. BACKGROUND: The Clerk-Recorder Division hosts department-specific job classifications to distinguish the technical duties and responsibilities performed by incumbents, beyond those of the County-wide Clerk deep class series. Since the inception of these departmental job classifications, the Clerk-Recorder Division has transitioned to using the Clerk-Experienced Level (JWXB) class as an entry-level rank and file position, while reserving more advanced tasks and procedures for job classifications specifically associated with the Clerk-Recorder Division. The long-time incumbent Clerk-Specialist Level recently retired, creating the vacancy. The department is interested in reclassifying this position to a Clerk-Recorder Services Specialist classification to align with the other staffing in the division. This is the final Clerk Specialist position in the department and this request would allow the division to more equitably rotate responsibilities. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Clerk-Recorder Division will have less bandwidth for training staff on, and performing, more technical responsibilities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Tyler Stull (925) 335-7997 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Tyler Stull, Sylvia WongTam C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Deborah R. Cooper, Clerk-Recorder Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Add One Clerk-Recorder Services Specialist Position and Cancel One Clerk-Specialist Level Position AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 26064 Add 1 Clerk Rec Sv Spec and cancel 1 Clerk Spclst MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26064 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26064 DATE 10/25/2022 Department No./ Department Clerk -Recorder-Elections Budget Unit No. 0355 Org No. 0355 Agency No. 024 Action Requested: Add one (1) Clerk -Recorder Services Specialist position (EATA, represented), salary plan and grade 3R5 - 1269 ($4,998.18-$6075.32), and cancel one (1) vacant Clerk -Specialist Level position (#11957, JWXD, represented), salary plan 3RX-1156 ($4,457.54-$5,692.46). Proposed Effective Date: 12/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) as sociated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $4,594.25 Net County Cost $4,594.25 Total this FY $2,679.98 N.C.C. this FY $2,679.98 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Costs are within the department's operating budget. Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT /s/ Julie Enea 10/31/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/18/2022 Add one (1) Clerk -Recorder Services Specialist (EATA) (represented) pos ition at salary plan and grade 3R5-1269 ($4,998.18- $6075.32), and cancel one (1) vacant Clerk -Specialist Level (JWXD) (represented) position number 11957 salary plan 3RX- 1156 ($4,457.54-$5,692.46) in the Clerk -Recorder Department. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Gladys Reid 11/18/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Res ources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 11/22/2022 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26069 to increase the hours of one vacant Institutional Services Worker-Generalist (1KVD) position #807 from 20/40 to 40/40 at salary plan and grade TB5 0922 ($3,544 - $4,308) in the Probation Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost to the Department of appoximately $30,000. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Juvenile Hall is staffed with a team of Institutional Services Workers whom are responsible for custodial, laundry, and kitchen tasks to maintain the health and sanitary conditions within the facility. Juvenile Hall is a 300,000+ square foot facility that requires 24/7 staffing to meet the health and sanitary standards set by the Bureau of State and Community Corrections. Currently, overtime is being used to adequately staff the needs of the facility. However, the addition of a full time staff person would lessen the need for overtime. Additionally, the part time position has been difficult to fill, and increasing the hours to a full time position will make this vacancy easier to fill. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Shkidt, (925) 313-4195 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Sylvia Wong Tam, Sarah Shkidt C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Increase hours of one vacant ISW from 20/40 to 40/40 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If unapproved, the Department will continue to utilize overtime to appropriately staff facilities. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 Form 26069 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26069 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26069 DATE 11/8/2022 Department No./ Department Probation Budget Unit No. 0309 Org No. 3120 Agency No. 30 Action Requested: Increase the hours of one vacant Institutional Services Worker-Generalist (Position #807) from 20/40 to 40/40. Proposed Effective Date: 12/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $30,000.00 Net County Cost $30,000.00 Total this FY $17,500.00 N.C.C. this FY $17,500.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Current OT costs Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sarah Shkidt ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT E.Farrell (for Paul Reyes) 11/8/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 11/9/2022 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26069 to increase the hours of one vacant Institutional Services Worker- Generalist (1KVD) Position #807 at salary plan and grade TB5 -0922 ($3,544 - $4,308) from 20/40 to 40/40. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Christine Bissada 11/9/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26073 to increase the hours of one (1) Medical Social Worker II (X4VH) position #7629 at salary plan and grade 255-1590 ($7,103-$8,633) from 30/40 to 40/40 and one (1) Community Health Worker II (VKVB) position #15812 at salary plan and grade TC5-1043 ($3,996-$4,857) from 32/40 to 40/40 in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost increase of approximately $57,119 with pension costs already included. This increase will be fully funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: Incumbents in the Community Health Worker II classification have the ability to request that their position hours be increased, as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding between the County and Teamsters, Local 856. The incumbent has requested to increase their hours from 32/40 to 40/40, and the department has determined that the increased positions are necessary to meet the operational needs of the Health Start Clinic. The Healthy Start Clinic provides pregnant mothers with comprehensive prenatal care and education. Their services include providing pregnancy tests, prenatal education, genetic testing, breastfeeding education and support, childbirth classes, car seat education, nutritional assessment, and 24/7 advice nurse assistance. Healthy start patients, which are comprised of underserved women who are pregnant or have just had children, rely on social services and counseling assistance provided by the clinic. Due to an increase in the number of referrals to this clinic, it is requested to increase both Medical Social Worker II and Community Health Worker II position hours to full-time to mitigate the service time gap for Healthy Start patients. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the department will not be able to fulfill the request of the incumbent and operational needs for additional support to serve Healthy Start patients. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-957-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Jenny Nguyen, Thomas Tighe, Jo-Anne Linares, Monica LaFleur, Linh Huynh, Kathi Caudel C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Increase the hours of one Medical Social Worker II position and one Community Health Worker II position in the Health Services Department AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300-26073 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26073 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26073 DATE 11/16/2022 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. vary Agenc y No. A18 Action Requested: Increase the hours of one (1) Medical Social Worker II (X4VH) position #7629 from 30/40 to 40/40 (org #6385) and one (1) Community Health Worker II (VKVB) position #15812 from 32/40 to 40/40 (org #6518) in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $57,119.99 Net County Cost $57,119.99 Total this FY $38,079.99 N.C.C. this FY $38,079.99 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jenny Nguyen ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Sarah Kennard for 11/21/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resourc es Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 11/22/2022 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Sarah Kennard Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution 2022/409 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply for and accept the 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Services Improvement Grant, with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, as fiscal agent, in an initial amount of $71,558 for support of forensic training for the period beginning April 1, 2023 through the end of the funding period. FISCAL IMPACT: $71,558. 100% Federal; No County match required (CFDA #16.742) BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Paul Coverdell Forensic Services Improvement Grant Program is to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic science services over current operations. The non-competitive funds are available for distribution during the period beginning April 1, 2023, through the end of the grant period. The Office of the Sheriff’s Forensic Services Division is an ANAB (ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board) accredited laboratory that has on-going training requirements to fulfill the accreditation criteria. This grant provides funding for DNA equipment and for annual training of forensic staff. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Abigail Balana, 925-655-0008 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not receive grant funding for training necessary to retain ANAB accreditation. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/409 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/409 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/409 IN THE MATTER OF: Applying for and accepting the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program. WHEREAS, the County of Contra Costa is seeking funds available through the U.S. Department of Justice for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: Authorizes the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff or Commander Management Services, to execute for and on the behalf of the County of Contra Costa, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining Federal assistance including grant modifications and extensions related to the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program; provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. Contact: Abigail Balana, 925-655-0008 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Grant Agreement #78-012 with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) including indemnification, in an amount not to exceed $563,447 for establishing clean air centers and environments in public spaces across the County, effective upon execution of agreement by BAAQMD and ending upon the later of : 1) five years from final payment by BAAQMD; or 2) November 14, 2027. FISCAL IMPACT: The impact on the County General Fund is anticipated to be none, as costs are paid directly by BAAQMD, for procurement of portable air cleaners and replacement filters to the 10 jurisdictions noted below. City of Concord (Senior Center) - 2 City of Danville/County Library - 3 City of El Cerrito - 21 City of Pittsburg - 30 City of Richmond - 10 Antioch Schools - 111 County Office of Education - 16 Oakley Union Elementary School District - 27 West Contra Costa School District - 55 Contra Costa Health Services (Homeless Shelters) - 12 Contra Costa Health Services (Emergency Prep) - 14 Total: 301 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-222-1472 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Agreement #78-012 with Bay Area Air Quality Management District FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) BACKGROUND: The Clean Air Center Program (“Program”) is a grant program designed to provide funding to purchase portable air cleaners and retrofit ventilation systems to create a network of clean air centers where people in vulnerable communities with high documented smoke burden can find respite from wildfires and other smoke events. This grant program is funded by Assembly Bill 836 as part of the California Air Resources Board’s Wildfire Smoke Clean Air Centers for Vulnerable Populations Pilot Program (Wicks, Chapter 393, California Health, and Safety Code Section 39960, 2019). The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), which oversees and administers the Program, has adopted guidelines and criteria for the Program’s implementation entitled, Wildfire Smoke Clean Air Centers for Vulnerable Populations Incentive Pilot Program Guidelines 2021 and subsequent CARB revisions and advisories issued for Program implementation (together the “CARB Program Guidelines”). The Air District implements the Program in the San Francisco Bay Area air basin in accordance with the CARB Program Guidelines and the Air District Clean Air Center Program Guidelines. On September 6, 2022, the County received formal notice of this funding award. Approval of Grant Agreement #78-012 will allow the County to establish clean air centers in public spaces in Contra Costa County for five years, including agreeing to indemnify and hold the BAAQMD harmless for claims arising out of the County’s performance under this agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to accept the grant and approve the agreement will delay implementation and use of public facilities across the county to be used as clean air environment during wildfire and other poor air quality events. Ten jurisdictions, including the County, would be impacted. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The dangers to children and student health are exacerbated during poor air quality events, especially when the Air Quality Index (AQI) exceeds 150, as has often occurred in association with wildfire events across northern California. Providing portable air filters in civic and school environments, including libraries supports the following Board of Supervisors community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School;” “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing;” and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families.” Expected program outcomes include a decrease in preventable health events, including asthma, eye and lung irritation. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/382 to replace Resolution No. 2021/358 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in an amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On November 2, 2021, the Board of Supervisors reviewed and approved application submission to and acceptance of funds from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for the THP Round 3 grant via Board Order C.32; Resolution Number 2021/358. The aforementioned Board Resolution named Kathy Gallagher, Employment and Human Services Department Director as the authorized party. The Board approved application and Resolution was provided to HCD on November 17, 2021. Subsequently, Marla APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of Board Order Action of November 2, 2021 (Item C.32) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Stuart was appointed EHSD Director on April 11, 2022. HCD is now requiring a replacement board resolution, removing Kathy Gallagher and recognizing EHSD Director as the authorized party. Board Resolution 2022/382 removes Kathy Gallagher as the authorized party and identifies “the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee” as the authorized party in accordance with HCD’s request. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without a replacement Board Resolution, County will not receive the funding previously awarded EHSD and allocated to the Children and Family Services housing program. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/382 Resolution 2022/382 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/382 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/382 In the Matter of: TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM RESOLUTION NUMBER: 2022/382 WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an allocation acceptance form, dated October 1, 2021 under the Transitional Housing Program (“THP” or “Program”) for $8 million authorized by item 2240-102-0001 of section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2021 (Chapter 69 of the Statutes of 2021) and Chapter 11.7 (commencing with Section 50807) of part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (the “Allocation Acceptance Form”); and WHEREAS, the Allocation Acceptance Form relates to the availability of the funds under the Program; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department was listed as an eligible applicant in the Allocation Acceptance Form, dated October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and accept County’s allocation award, as detailed in the Allocation Acceptance Form (the “THP Allocation Award”), up to the amount authorized the Allocation Acceptance Form and applicable state law; and WHEREAS, that if funds remain available for allocation after the deadline for submitting a signed Allocation Acceptance Form, and if the Department advises County that County is eligible for an additional allocation from these remaining funds, County is hereby authorized and directed to accept this additional allocation of funds (“Additional THP Allocation”) up to the amount authorized by Department; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/358 on November 2, 2021, to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021/358 named Kathy Gallagher as the Employment and Human Services Director to act on behalf of the County in connection with the Round 3 Allocation Award and any Additional THP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the THP Allocation Award, and any Additional THP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “THP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, replacing Kathy Gallagher is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the THP Allocation Award and any Additional THP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program and be awarded the THP Allocation Award, and any Additional THP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “THP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County shall be subject to the terms and conditions that are specified in the THP Allocation Award Documents, and that County will use the THP Allocation Award funds and any Additional THP Allocation funds in accordance with the Allocation Acceptance Form, the THP Allocation Award Documents, and any and all other THP requirements, and other applicable laws; and Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve to replace Resolution No. 2021/358 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024. Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: 29-466-3 Resolution No. In the Matter of: TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM RESOLUTION NUMBER: 202 2/382 WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an allocation acceptance form, dated October 1, 2021 under the Transitional Housing Program (“THP” or “Program”) for $8 million authorized by item 2240-102 -0001 of section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2021 (Chapter 69 of the Statutes of 2021) and Chapter 11.7 (commencing with Section 50807) of part 2 of Division 31 o f the Health and Safety Code (the “Allocation Acceptance Form”); and WHEREAS, the Allocation Acceptance Form relates to the availability of the funds under the Program; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Employment an d Human Services Department was listed as an eligible applicant in the Allocation Acceptance Form, dated October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and accept County’s allocation award, as detailed in the Allocation Acceptance Form (the “THP Allocation Award”), up to the amount authorized the Allocation Acceptance Form and applicable state law; and WHEREAS, that if funds remain available for allocation after the deadline for submitting a signed Allocation Acceptance Form, and if the Department advises County that County is eligible for an additional allocation from these remaining funds, County is hereby authorized and directed to accept this additional allocation of funds (“Additional THP Allocation”) up to the amount authorized by D epartment; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/358 on November 2, 2021, to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021/358 named Kathy Gallagher as the Emplo yment and Human Services Director to act on behalf of the County in connection with the Round 3 Allocation Award and any Additional THP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the THP Allocation Award, and any Additional THP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “THP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, replacing Kathy Gallagher is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the THP Alloca tion Award and any Additional THP Allocation, and to enter into, execut e, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program and be awarded the THP Allocation Award, and any Additional THP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “THP Alloc ation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County shall be subject to the terms and conditions that are specified in the THP Allocation Award Documents, and that County will use the THP Allocation Award funds and any Additional THP Allocation funds in accordance with the Allocation Acceptance Form, the THP Allocation Award Documents, and any and all other THP requirements, and other applicable laws ; and Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve to rep lace Resolution No. 2021/358 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $113,600 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 3 from the date of grant award through June 30, 2024. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/383 to replace Resolution No. 2021/357 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the date of the grant award, through June 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On November 2, 2021, the Board of Supervisors reviewed and approved application submission to and acceptance of funds from the State of California Housing and Community Development (HCD) for the HNP Round 2 grant via Board Order C.29; Resolution Number 2021/357. The aforementioned Board Resolution named Kathy Gallagher, Employment and Human Services Department Director as the authorized party. The Board approved application APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of Board Action of November 2, 2021 (Item C. 29) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and Resolution was provided to HCD on November 17, 2021. Subsequently, Marla Stuart was appointed EHSD Director on April 11, 2022. HCD is now requiring a replacement board resolution, removing Kathy Gallagher and recognizing EHSD Director as the authorized party. Board Resolution 2022/382 removes Kathy Gallagher as the authorized party and identifies “the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee” as the authorized party in accordance with HCD’s request. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without a replacement Board Resolution, County will not receive funding previously awarded to EHSD and allocate to the Children and Family Services housing program. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/383 Resolution 2022/383 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/383 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/383 In the Matter of: THE HOUSING NAVIGATORS HOUSING PROGRAM RESOLUTION NUMBER: 2022/383 WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an Allocation Acceptance form, dated October 1, 2021 under the Housing Navigators Program (“HNP” or “Program”) for $5,000,000 authorized by Item 2240-103-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2019 (SB 109), as amended by Section 2.00 of Chapter 21 of the Statutes of 2021 (AB 128). WHEREAS, the Allocation Acceptance Form relates to the availability of the funds under the Program; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department was listed as an eligible applicant in the Allocation Acceptance Form, dated October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and accept County’s allocation award, as detailed in the Allocation Acceptance Form (the “HNP Allocation Award”), up to the amount authorized the Allocation Acceptance Form and applicable state law; and WHEREAS, that if funds remain available for allocation after the deadline for submitting a signed Allocation Acceptance Form, and if the Department advises County that County is eligible for an additional allocation from these remaining funds, County is hereby authorized and directed to accept this additional allocation of funds (“Additional HNP Allocation”) up to the amount authorized by Department; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/357 on November 2, 2021, to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the period of grant award through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021/357 named Kathy Gallagher as the Employment and Human Services Director to act on behalf of the County in connection with the Round 2 Allocation Award and any Additional HNP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the HNP Allocation Award, and any Additional HNP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “HNP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, replacing Kathy Gallagher is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the HNP Allocation Award and any Additional HNP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program and be awarded the HNP Allocation Award, and any Additional HNP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “HNP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County shall be subject to the terms and conditions that are specified in the HNP Allocation Award Documents, and that County will use the HNP Allocation Award funds and any Additional HNP Allocation funds in accordance with the Allocation Acceptance Form, the HNP Allocation Award Documents, and any and all other HNP requirements, and other applicable laws; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve to replace Resolution No. 2021/357 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the date of the grant award, through June 30, 2024. Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: 29-463-2 RESOLUTION In the Matter of: THE HOUSING NAVIGATORS HOUSING PROGRAM RESOLUTION NUMBER: 2022/383 WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an Allocation Acceptance form, dated October 1, 2021 under the Housing Navigators Program (“HNP” or “Program”) for $5,000,000 authorized by Item 2240-103-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2019 (SB 109), as amended by Section 2.00 of Chapter 21 of the Statutes of 2021 (AB 128). WHEREAS, the Allocation Acceptance Form relates to the availability of the funds under the Program; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department was listed as an eligible applicant in the Allocation Acceptance Form, dated October 1, 2021 ; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and accept County’s allocation award, as detailed in the Allocation Acceptance Form (the “HNP Allocation Award”), up to the amount authorized the Allocation Acceptance Form and applic able state law; and WHEREAS, that if funds remain available for allocation after the deadline for submitting a signed Allocation Acceptance Form, and if the Department advises County that County is eligible for an additional allocation from these remaining funds, County is hereby authorized and directed to accept this additional allocation of funds (“Additional HNP Allocation”) up to the amount authorized by Department ; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/357 on November 2, 2021, to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or de signee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the period of grant award through June 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2021/357 named Kathy Gallagher as the Employment and Human Services Director to act on behalf of the County in c onnection with the Round 2 Allocation Award and any Additional HNP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the HNP Allocation Award, and any Additional HNP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “HNP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee , replacing Kathy Gallagher is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the HNP Allocation Award and any Additional HNP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program and be awarded the HNP Allocation Award, and any Additional HNP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “HNP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County shall be subject to the terms and conditions that are specified in the HNP Allocation Award Documents, and that County will use the HNP Allocation Award funds and any Additional HNP Allocation funds in accordance with the Allocation Acceptance Form, the HN P Allocation Award Documents, and any and all other HNP requirem ents, and other applicable laws; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve to replace Resolution No. 2021/357 clarifying the approval and authorization of the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant award in the amount of $116,980 from the 29-463-2 California Department of Housing and Community Development for the Housing Navigators Program (HNP) Round 2 from the date of the grant award, through June 30, 2024. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Standard Agreement #29-502-48 (State #22-20151) with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), to pay the County an amount not to exceed $193,200,000, to provide substance abuse prevention, treatment and recovery support services to County residents through the authority of Federal Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grants (SABG), for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2027. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will provide funding to the County in an amount not to exceed $193,200,000 for the SABG for a five-year term. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: DHCS provides funding to counties for Substance Abuse Disorder (SUD) prevention and treatment services through a contractual mechanism. This contract is supported by State General Fund, Federal Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Block Grant and the Federal share of reimbursement claimed for Drug Medi-Cal services. The County has been contracting with DHCS for these services since 1998. On November 5, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #29-502-45 with DHCS, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $64,760,373 to provide SUD prevention and treatment services, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. On April 20, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #29-502-47 with DHCS to decrease the amount payable by $1,222,762 to new total of $63,537,611 for continued Drug Medical Substance Abuse Treatment Services with no change in the original term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5501 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Standard Agreement #29-502-48 with the California Department of Health Care Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of this Standard Agreement #29-502-48 allows the County to continue to receive SABG allocation funds and allow the Department to continue providing substance abuse services to Contra Costa County residents, through June 30, 2027. In accordance with this agreement, the County agrees to indemnify and hold the State harmless for claims arising out of the County’s performance under the Agreement. This agreement is being processed late due to language revisions by DHCS regarding new federal and state requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the County will not receive funding to support the continuation of substance abuse services in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/408 approving and authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner or designee, to apply for and accept the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement in the amount of $738,249 for marine patrol and boating regulation enforcement for the period July 1, 2023 through the end of available funding. FISCAL IMPACT: An initial amount of $738,249 has been granted by the state. The Office of the Sheriff receives annual funding from the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways that is incorporated in the baseline budget. No County match. BACKGROUND: California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) provides funding to maintain the service level of the Office of the Sheriff's Marine Patrol Unit on the Delta Waterways. Marine patrol operations cost roughly $2.4 million per year of which DBW has awarded $738,249 for each of the past five years. DBW funding provides the ability for more vigilant enforcement of boating regulations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to secure State funding will result in a further reduction in Marine Patrol Services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/408 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/408 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/408 IN THE MATTER OF: Applying for and Accepting the FY 2023/2024 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement. WHEREAS, the County of Contra Costa is seeking funds available through the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement; County of Contra Costa shall not allocate funds to any county or a public agency within a county unless County of Contra Costa receives a resolution adopted annually by the board of supervisors authorizing the county to participate in the program and certifying that the county will expend for boating safety programs during that year not less than an amount equal to 100 percent of the amount received by the county from personal property taxes on vessels. The money allocated to a county pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be used only for boating safety and enforcement programs, as specified in subdivision (b), that are conducted in that county. (1) In the case of a local government agency within a county, a certified copy of the resolution or minute order shall accompany the application for financial aid from that local government entity, as well as a certified copy of the resolution or minute order from its county board of supervisors, authorizing the agency to participate in the program. (2) The resolution or minute order shall: (A) Authorize the chairperson, or designated representative, to sign the application and contract. (B) Authorize the chairperson, or designated agency representative, to sign the department's form for each reimbursement claim. (C) Authorize the county auditor to certify the amount of prior year vessel taxes received by the county. (3) The department may deny the application if the applicant agency fails to provide the above-referenced information or data. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: Authorizes the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff or Commander Management Services, to sign the application, contract and County of Contra Costa form for each reimbursement claim; authorizes the County Auditor Controller to certify the amount of prior year vessel taxes received by County of Contra Costa. And on behalf of the County of Contra Costa, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any action necessary for the purpose of obtaining financial assistance including Agreement modifications and extensions provided by California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways Financial Aid Program Agreement. Contact: Donn David, 925-655-0037 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment Agreement #28-849-9 (State #18-10866-A01) with the California Department of Public Health, to increase the amount payable to the County by $590,789 from $2,532,688 to a new total payment limit of $3,123,477, with no change in the original term of April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in an increase in the amount of $590,789 from the California Department of Public Health. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The goals of the California Department of Public Health, Office of AIDS are: 1) to minimize new HIV infections; and 2) to maximize the number of people with HIV infection who access appropriate care, treatment, support and prevention services. The services required by the HIV Prevention Program, scope of work, in this agreement are consistent with, and are designed to support these goals. The County has been contracting with the California Department of Public Health for these services since July 1, 2013. On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #28-849-7, for the County to provide residents of Contra Costa County access to medical and support care services, including outreach and treatment under the HIV Care Program and Minority AIDS Initiative project, for the period from April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024, which included agreeing to indemnify and hold the State harmless for claims arising out of the County’s performance under the agreement. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #28-849-9 will allow the County to receive additional funds to continue providing medical and support care services through March 31, 2024. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #28-849-9 with the California Department of Public Health CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not receive the necessary funding to support the reduction in transmission of HIV, provide the prevention services that will reduce hospitalization, and provide support to HIV positive individuals in their homes, or to support compliance with State and Federal requirements for reporting of communicable disease. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Grant Amendment Agreement #28-383-4 with the BART Police Department, to increase the amount payable to the County by $249,165, from $772,033 to a new amount of up to $1,021,198, and to extend the term date from June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2023, for the County’s Coordinated Outreach Referral and Engagement (CORE) Program to provide homeless outreach services within the BART system. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this grant amendment agreement will result in additional payments to the County of up to $249,165 for the Health, Housing, and Homeless Department's CORE Program. No county match is required. BACKGROUND: The CORE Program locates and engages homeless clients throughout Contra Costa County. CORE teams serve as an entry point into the County’s coordinated entry system for unsheltered persons and work to locate, engage, stabilize and house chronically homeless individuals and families. The County has been receiving funds from BART under this agreement since December 2018. On December 18, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #28–383 to allow the County to receive funds in an amount of $160,570 to provide homeless outreach services within the BART system for the period December 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. On September 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #28-383-1 to increase the amount payable to the County by $179,994 to a new amount not to exceed $340,564 and to extend the term date form June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020. On July 14, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #28-383-2 to increase the amount payable to the County by $178,500 to a new amount not to exceed $519,064, and to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021. On July 27, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #28-383-3 to increase the amount payable to the County by $252,969 to a new amount not to exceed $772,033, and to extend the term date from June 30, 2021 to June 30, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Christy Saxton, 925-608-6700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Amendment Agreement #28–383-4 with the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Police Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Grant Amendment Agreement #28-383-4 will allow the County to receive additional funds through June 30, 2023. This agreement includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this agreement. This amendment request was delayed due to the County not receiving the amendment from BART until October 24, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not receive additional funds to provide homeless outreach services within the BART system. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): RATIFY the Contra Costa County Probation Departments application for grant funding from the California Office of Traffic Safety, and authorize the Chief of Probation, and or designee, to execute an agreement, and accept funding in an amount not to exceed $398,845 for intensive probation supervision for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% State revenue. No match. BACKGROUND: The Probation Department has had a partnership with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for more than 15 years. The support and assistance provided by OTS, coupled with strong working relationships with state and local law enforcement agencies, has allowed the Probation Department to closely monitor and rehabilitate clients. Reducing the traumatic impact that impaired driving causes across the community contributes to improving public safety. The safety of communities is a top priority and intensive supervision programs hold DUI offenders accountable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Shkidt, (925)313-4195 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:State of California Office of Traffic Safety Grant BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) This grant will fund Probation Department personnel for an intensive probation supervision program for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions. The intensive supervision program involves check-ins with probationers to make sure they are following court-ordered terms of their probation, including conducting unannounced fourth amendment waiver home searches, field visits, random alcohol and drug testing and ensuring those on probation are attending court-ordered DUI education and treatment programs. This grant will also pay for warrant operations targeting probation violations and or DUI suspects who do not appear in court, officer training in Standard Field Sobriety Testing (SFST), distribution of DUI "Be On the Lookout" (BOLO) alerts, and collaboration with courts and prosecutors to establish probation orders and participation with local law enforcement on anti-DUI efforts. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If unapproved, Probation would not be able to accept funding from the State to provide intensive supervision for high risk DUI offenders. CLERK'S ADDENDUM ADOPTED Resolution No. 2022/402 to ratify the Contra Costa County Probation Departments application for grant funding from the California Office of Traffic Safety, and authorize the Chief of Probation, and or designee, to execute an agreement, and accept funding in an amount not to exceed $398,845 for intensive probation supervision for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/402 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/402 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/402 IN THE MATTER OF: Ratifying Probations grant application with the California Office of Traffic Safety, and authorizing the Chief of Probation, and or designee, to execute a grant agreement and accept funding. WHEREAS the Contra Costa County Probation Department is seeking funds for an intensive probation supervision program for high-risk DUI offenders with multiple DUI convictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the Board of Supervisors ratifies Probation Departments application, and authorizes the Chief of Probation or designee, to execute an agreement, including any modifications and or extensions thereof, and to accept funding with the California Office of Traffic Safety. Contact: Sarah Shkidt, (925)313-4195 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/413 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept allocations from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) allocation awards in the amount of $415,126 for the Transitional Housing Program (THP) Round 4, and $240,271 for the Housing Navigation and Maintenance Program (HNMP) Round 1, for the period of 24 months from effective date of fully executed HCD agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive $415,126 for THP Round 4 and $240,271 for HNMP Round 1, funding is 100% State with no County match required. FY22-23 expenditure appropriations and revenue adjustments for the allocations will be included as part of the mid-year budget adjustment. FY23-24 revenue adjustments will be incorporated into the FY2023-2024 budget. BACKGROUND: The State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Adopt Resolution No. 2022/413 to accept Transitional Housing Program Round 4 and Housing Navigation Maintenance Program Round 1 funding BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) issued an Allocation Acceptance Notification, dated November 1, 2022, under Round 4 of the THP, authorized by item 2240-102-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2022 (Chapter 249 of the Statutes of 2022) and Chapter 11.7 (commencing with Section 50807) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code; and under Round 1 of the HNMP, authorized by item 2240-103-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2022 (Chapter 43 of the Statutes of 2022) and Chapter 11.8 (commencing with Section 50811) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code. The Allocation Acceptance forms relate to the availability of THP Round 4 and HNMP Round 1 Allocation funds; and EHSD was mentioned in the Allocation Acceptance forms dated November 1, 2022. Allocated funds are to be used by counties to provide housing stability supports and services to help young adults ages 18 to 24 years of age, inclusive, secure and maintain housing with the priority given to young adults formerly in the foster care systems. Funds are available for 24 months from effective date of fully executed HCD Standard Agreement between HCD and Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD). The THP funds will be used to support and expand existing THP programs and contracts with housing assistance programs in the county to provide eligible young adults housing while obtaining skills and supportive services to become self-sufficient, including educational and employment services, counseling and crisis intervention, as well as assistance with securing permanent housing. EHSD will coordinate with the Contra Costa Health Services, Health Housing and Homeless Services Department (H3) as the local Continuum of Care to foster communication and collaboration. The HNMP funds will be used to provide housing navigation program services to help eligible young adults secure and maintain housing, through a contract with H3. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, County will continue to face an increasing number of homeless and runaway youths without access to housing and preventive services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/413 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/413 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/413 In the Matter Of: Round 4 Transitional Housing Program and Round 1 Housing Navigation and Maintenance Program Allocation Acceptance WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an allocation acceptance form, dated November 1, 2022 under Round 4 of the Transitional Housing Program (“THP”), authorized by item 2240-102-0001 of section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2022 (Chapter 249 of the Statutes of 2022) and Chapter 11.7 (commencing with Section 50807) of part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (the “THP Allocation Acceptance Form”); and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued an Allocation Acceptance form, dated November 1, 2022 under Round 1 of the Housing Navigation and Maintenance Program (“HNMP”) authorized by Item 2240-103-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2022 (Chapter 43 of the Statutes of 2022) and Chapter 11.8 (commencing with Section 50811) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (the “HNMP Allocation Acceptance Form”); and WHEREAS, the THP Allocation Acceptance Form and the HNMP Allocation Acceptance Form are collectively referred to as the “Allocation Acceptance Forms”; and WHEREAS, the Allocation Acceptance Forms relate to the availability of the funds under the THP and HNMP Programs; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County was listed as an eligible applicant in the THP Allocation Acceptance Form, dated November 1, 2022 and Contra Costa County was also listed as an eligible applicant in the HNMP Allocation Acceptance Form, dated November 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and accept County’s allocation award, as detailed in the Allocation Acceptance Forms, up to the amount authorized in the Allocation Acceptance Forms and applicable state law at the time this resolution is executed and authorized; and WHEREAS, that if funds remain available for allocation after the deadline for submitting signed Allocation Acceptance Forms, and if the Department advises County that County is eligible for additional allocation from the remaining funds, County is hereby authorized and directed to accept these additional allocations of THP and/or HNMP funds (“Additional THP Allocation” or “Additional HNMP Allocation”) up to the amount authorized by Department; and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the THP Allocation Award and any Additional THP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to be participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the THP Allocation Award, and any Additional THP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “THP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to act on behalf of County in connection with the HNMP Allocation Award and any Additional HNMP Allocation, and to enter into, execute, and deliver any and all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, including but not limited to a Standard Agreement, and be awarded the HNMP Allocation Award, and any Additional HNMP Allocation, and any amendments to such documents (collectively, the “HNMP Allocation Award Documents”); and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County shall be subject to the terms and conditions that are specified in the Allocation Acceptance Forms, and that County will use the allocated award funds and any Additional Allocation funds in accordance with the Allocation Acceptance Forms, the Allocation Award Documents, and any and all other allocation funding requirements, and other applicable laws; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County has the discretion to accept both the THP and HNMP funds as detailed herein but in the event circumstances arise, the County affirms that County is authorized to accept either of the Allocation Awards independent of each other. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept the allocated awards designated in the Allocation Acceptance Forms and applicable state law in the amount of $415,126 for Round 4 of the THP and $240,271 for Round 1 of the HNMP from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the period of 24 months from the effective date of the fully executed HCD Standard Agreement(s). Contact: C. Youngblood (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Grant Agreement #29-818-5 containing mutual indemnification with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health), a nonprofit corporation, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $25,000 for participation in the FoodNet Expanded Case Exposure Ascertainment (eCEA) Project, for the period from August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will result in an amount not to exceed $25,000 in funding from the Public Health Foundation Enterprises. (No County match) BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department’s Public Health Division receives hundreds of reports of Salmonellosis and Shigellosis cases annually. There are likely many cases that do not get reported because community members do not see their doctor or confirmatory testing is not performed. These infections can result in serious illness and hospitalization across the age spectrum. Administering the expanded case report and the eCEA questionnaire will allow health officials to gathering additional information that could result in enhanced disease prevention and control activities. On October 5, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Agreement #29-818-4 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Heluna Health) to receive funds in the amount of $23,639 for participation in the eCEA, to study foodborne bacteria, for the period from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022. Approval of Agreement #29-818-5 will allow the County to continue to receive funds to support the eCEA Project, through July 31, 2023. This agreement includes mutual indemnification. There was a delay in submitting this agreement for approval due to the division not receiving the agreement until October 25, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the County will not receive funding to provide services for the eCEA Project. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #29-818-5 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health) ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Agreement #28-706-26 including mutual indemnification with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc., a nonprofit corporation, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $137,813 for participation in the California Emerging Infections Program (EIP) for the period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: The agreement will result in an amount of up to $137,813 in funding from the Food and Drug Administration Grant for the EIP provided through the Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for Enteric Bacteria was established in 1996 to monitor bacterial resistance, specifically, the resistance among Salmonella and other enteric bacteria. The 17 participating state health departments forward every tenth human Salmonella isolate to Center for Disease Control (CDC) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The CDC is requesting that additional EIP sites participate in the study of foodborne bacteria. Such bacteria is not uncommon and often is associated with the use of antimicrobial agents in food animals, especially in retail food. This study will assist in generating a database that may be utilized to augment the development of intervention programs to stem the high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the meal and poultry food supply. The goal of the study is to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella, Campylobacter, E.coli and enterococci isolated from a sample of chicken, ground turkey, ground beef and pork chops purchased from selected grocery stores in the catchment area of the California EIP FoodNet site. This will include samples collected from Contra Costa, Alameda and San Francisco County retail grocery stores. On November 2, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #28-706-24 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. to pay county an amount not to exceed $127,479 for participation in the California EIP Program for the period September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2022. This agreement included mutual indemnification. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #28-706-26 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On May 10, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #28-706-25 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. to increase the amount payable to the county by $31,128 to a new amount not to exceed $158,607 for participation in the California EIP with no change in the term. Approval of this Agreement #28-706-26 will allow continuous funding to support the EIP - Retail Foods Project through August 31, 2023. This agreement includes mutual indemnification. This request being brought to the Board was delayed due to the timing of the grant award. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved the County will not receive additional funding to continue provide services for the EIP. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee (the Director of Environmental Health or Assistant Director of Health Services), to submit Grant Application #28-759-29 (TEA-30) to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), to pay the County an amount of up to $500,000 for the Environmental Health Waste Tire Enforcement Program, for the period from June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this application could result in revenues of up to $500,000 from CalRecycle for the Environmental Health Waste Tire Enforcement Program. The funds are allocated and available from CalRecycle for grants to solid waste Local Enforcement Agencies (LEA) and cities and counties with regulatory authority within the city and county government to perform enforcement/compliance and surveillance activities at waste tire facilities. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Environmental Health/General Programs is the solid waste LEA for the entire County, including all incorporated cities except for the City of Pittsburg. CalRecycle has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures governing application by cities and counties under the program. Since 2007, Contra Costa County has demonstrated it has sufficient staff resources, technical expertise, and/or experience to carry out the proposed program. The Program allows the County to monitor and reduce illegal waste tire practices, educate and enforce proper waste tire management and assist in reducing potential vector problems and prevention of tire fires and otherwise protecting public health safety. Approval of Application #28-759-29 will allow Contra Costa County Environmental Health Services to apply for funds to continue implementing the Environmental Health Waste Tire Enforcement Program in the Health Services Department through September 30, 2024. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn Stortz, 925-608-5500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Submission of Grant Application #28-759-29 to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant is not approved, the County will not seek available state funding for the monitoring and reduction of illegal waste tire practices, educating and enforcing proper waste tire management throughout the County, assisting in reducing potential vector problems and preventing tire fires, nor protecting public health and safety. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director or designee to apply for and accept the Governor’s Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) 15% discretionary funds for Workforce Accelerator Fund 11 for the Workforce Development Board (WDB) to develop and implement an innovation impact project in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the period March 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditures appropriation and revenue adjustments in amounts not to exceed $500,000 will be made during FY 2022-2023 when the Department is notified of the grant award. These funds require 1:1 cash or in-kind leveraged/match which we anticipate will be funded by partners of the Workforce Development Board. No county match required. BACKGROUND: The goal of Accelerator 11 is to ensure economic impact and racial equity by creating pathways to good quality jobs for workers from disadvantaged or low-income communities. Traditional workforce and education strategies have had an inadequate impact. Workforce Development Board (WDB) is proposing to APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize the Application for and Acceptance of Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funds BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) build upon, a Marine Technician Apprenticeship program. The program is an innovative apprenticeship program designed to train the next generation of marine industry craftspeople. The Marine Technician Apprenticeship program approved by the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards, the federal Department of Labor, is the first program of its kind in California. The program focuses on helping Apprentices develop key skills and contacts in many facets of the marine industry. Grant term March 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval, participants in special extraneous grant programs will not have access to classroom instruction and job training that lead to self-sufficiency which would adversely impact these participants. Local businesses will have fewer qualified candidates for positions. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The revenue and services funded under this agreement supports three of the five Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient; (2) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and (3) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with ClearGov in an amount not to exceed $108,350 to provide software licensing and configuration, including three years of maintenance and set up support, of a digital budget book publishing software system for the period December 12, 2022 through December 11, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract cost comprises a one-time set up fee of $5,600 and annual subscription service fee of $34,250. The total general fund cost of the three-year contract term would be $108,350. BACKGROUND: Each year the County Administrator's Office produces a digital and physical budget book for the Recommended Budget. The process involves creating, formatting, and synthesizing nearly 200 Excel, Word, and PDF files into a single, cohesive, budget document. Narratives are written, hundreds of tables and charts are pasted in, countless individual figures are populated and vetted and re-vetted, and a table of contents is assembled and manually hyperlinked. Since 2011, the annual cycle for the budget book has resulted in a Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, but the process has been manual and extremely labor intensive. The requested contract with ClearGov would provide a software subscription service to help produce an easy to navigate, web-based budget book with far more administrative efficiency. Raw data files for the county's budget would be loaded in the software system and transformed. The GFOA award criteria has been built-in to ClearGov’s framework and templates, and auto-creates key sections and pre-populates them with required data. Subsequent updating of budget tables, charts, and figures throughout the budget book would be far simpler and error-free, and virtually all of the administrative and formatting tasks would be automated, freeing staff to focus on content. The County's Recommended Budget would be available online in an intuitive, easy to navigate, interactive format, or it could be downloaded as a single PDF document. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Adam Nguyen, (925) 655-2048 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with ClearGov for Digital Budget Book publishing subscription service BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Obtaining the subscription service would enable the County to more easily produce an award winning budget book that would be more user friendly and accessible for the public. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Disapproval of the recommendation would continue the manual, highly labor-intensive production of the County's annual budget book, and the County would not have an easy to navigate, interactive web-based version of the annually recommended budget. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract with Peregrine Technologies, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $570,000 to provide a statistical software system for executive analysis and reporting to facilitate law enforcement planning and response, for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025, with an option to extend for up to two additional years through November 30, 2027 at a cost of $190,000 per year. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract is funded 100% by County General Fund. BACKGROUND: The District Attorney’s Office (DAO) has identified the need for advanced analysis of our database to enable data-driven decision making, as well as increase the level of transparency to the community regarding the operations of the DAO. Our current software systems provide us with data and information. However, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Zhongzhou Zhu, 925-957-2205 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Peregrine Technologies BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) in its current configuration the data is not suitable for analysis, nor are we able to query the system for more complex information. In addition, the District Attorney’s Office has the responsibility of complying with the Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA). This bill requires all sworn law enforcement agencies in California to report their demographic stop data to the California Department of Justice. The Peregrine software application will allow DAO law enforcement personnel to collect and report the relevant data via a mobile application. The initial term of the contract is for three years from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. The DAO may extend the contract for up to two (2) additional one-year terms after the initial term, extending the contract through November 30, 2027. The total amount payable to the contractor will not exceed $950,000 by November 30, 2027. The contract requires Peregrine to maintain cyber insurance coverage of $2,000,000. Peregrine will provide professional services to deploy the software system, integrate and model customer data, and configure user-facing tools to support priority workflows and use cases, and conduct training. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District Attorney’s Office will be limited in its ability to interpret its data, and our responsibilities related to RIPA will take more time because the forms will have to be completed manually. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, to pay $236,383 to Medline Industries, Inc for medical supplies, surgical supplies, laboratory supplies, diagnostic imaging supplies, cleaning supplies, disaster supplies, miscellaneous minor equipment, and low unit of measure (LUM) services provided to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) from June 1, 2022, through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $236,383 and will be funded by 90% Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues and 10% American Rescue Plan Act allocations. BACKGROUND: Medline Industries is the primary distributor for medical and non-medical supplies and products for the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. They have been awarded a Vizient Group Purchasing (GPO) agreement for the distribution of contracted and non-contracted supplies. As a Vizient member, the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers receive enhanced value from their participation in the Medline Vizient contract. Additionally, administrative fees and program rebates are paid quarterly to the County for participating in the Vizient Medline agreement. In addition to providing medical supplies, surgical supplies, laboratory supplies, diagnostic imaging supplies, cleaning supplies, disaster supplies, and miscellaneous minor equipment for CCRMC and the Contra Costa Health Centers, Medline also provides low unit of measure (LUM) services. CCRMC's space constraints create challenges for providing a Low Unit of Measure (LUM) distribution program. The square footage and floor plan of the warehouse is inadequate to store and properly inventory the thousands of Store Keeping Units (SKUs) maintained on the static carts. Therefore, CCRMC utilizes Medline to maintain the items stocked on the carts and to be distributed to the various units and clinics that are not available from the CCRMC warehouse. On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.146 to execute a purchase order with Medline Industries Inc. in an amount not to exceed $33,000,000 for medical supplies, cleaning supplies, disaster supplies, and miscellaneous equipment for CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period from June 27, 2019 through June 26, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronny Leffel, 925-550-2299 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Services Provided by Medline Industries, Inc BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On June 7, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.90 to execute an amendment to purchase order (#16157) with Medline Industries, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $1,000,000 to a new payment limit of $34,000,000 to include low unit of measure (LUM) services provided to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), and extend the term through June 30, 2022. Due to an oversight by the Materials Management Accounts Payable unit, the amendment was understated by $236,382.60. The vendor is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of its services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. The theory provides that where a vendor has been asked to provide services without a valid payment instrument, and the vendor does so to the benefit of the County, the vendor is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. The vendor has provided services at the request of the County. The Department cannot pay the vendor for services rendered as the purchasing instrument has reached the maximum amount approved. As such, the Department is requesting that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment not to exceed $236,383. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers will not be able to pay this vendor for services rendered in good faith and as requested by Health Services Department staff. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): (1) APPROVE the design and bid documents, including the plans and specifications for typical work, contract, General Conditions, Technical Specifications, and the Construction Task Catalog for Job Order Contracts (JOC) 021, 022, 023 and 024. (2) AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to solicit bids to be received on or about January 4, 2023 and issue bid addenda, as needed, for clarifications of the bid documents, provided the involved changes do not significantly increase the construction cost estimate. (3) DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish, at least 14 calendar days before the bid opening date, the Notice to Contractors in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22037, inviting bids for this project. (4) DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to send notices by email or fax and by U.S. Mail to the construction trade journals specified in Public Contract Code Section 22036 at least 15 calendar days before the bid opening. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeffrey K. Acuff 925-9570-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Advertisement for Construction Bids for Annual Job Order Contracts 021, 022, 023 & 024 (W4011C) FISCAL IMPACT: JOC work orders will only be issued when there is an approved project and funding. The contract value can range from a minimum of $25,000 to a maximum of $5,400,000. The maximum contract value of $5,400,000 per annual JOC contract is a maximum limit based on Public Contract Code Section 20128.5 (not actual appropriated dollars), and it is possible that the limit may not be reached. Having this limit allows for efficiency and flexibility in accomplishing work up to the maximum statutory limit. (100% Various Funds) BACKGROUND: To be efficient in delivering projects, the County has employed a variety of project delivery methods. One such method is Public Contract Code Section 20128.5, which authorizes counties to award one or more individual annual contracts for repair, remodeling, or other repetitive work to be done according to unit prices. Once an annual contract is awarded, individual projects are then done through written job orders performed by the job order contractor at the unit prices bid for the annual contract. Such Job Order Contracting (JOC) is a project delivery tool that has been proven to reduce to reduce costs, save time, and increase productivity. On July 28, 2015, the County executed a Consulting Services Agreement with The Gordian Group dba The Mellon Group to provide JOC program development and implementation services for various County projects. As part of the agreement, Gordian also develops and maintains a JOC catalog, also known as a "unit price book" that contains individual construction tasks for all aspects of the repair, remodeling, and other repetitive work including general conditions, driveways, parking lots, and other construction-related components. The Board of Supervisors has approved several amendments so that Gordian can continue supporting the program. Since November 2015, the Board of Supervisors has awarded JOC contracts to the lowest bidders to work on repair, remodeling, and maintenance projects countywide. With current JOC contracts awarded on November 2 , 2021 (JOC 016, 017, 018 & 019) expiring over the next several months, we need Board approval to start solicitation of bids for Job Order Contracts 021, 022, 023 & 024. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements will be determined and addressed on a project-by-project bases as projects occur. If annual JOC contracts are ultimately awarded under this solicitation, each will be a term of 12 months. The County reserves the right to award one or more of Job Order Contracts 021, 022, 023 & 024. The County is not required to award all four contracts and is not required to award any contract if the bid pricing is unfavorable. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The JOC program has been a valuable construction project delivery tool for projects. If JOC bid solicitation is not approved and authorized, the County will not have the resources to complete deferred maintenance projects as described in the Facilities Lifecycle Investment Program (FLIP) report and other County construction projects involving repair, remodeling, and other repetitive work. ATTACHMENTS Contract Specifications RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with The Gordian Group d/b/a The Mellon Group, to extend the term from December 31, 2022 through February 29, 2024 and increase the payment limit by $750,000 to a new payment limit of $3,250,000, to provide Job Order Contracting program development and implementation services for various County facilities projects, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: Projects will be assigned to JOC contractors and serviced by The Gordian Group if and when there is an approved project and funding. Gordian charges a 5% License and Job Order Development Fee based on the value of the job order. (100% Various Funds) BACKGROUND: Since 2015, Public Works Capital Projects Management Division has relied on JOC (Job Order Contractor) contracting for execution of a large portion of its construction projects. The JOC program is managed by Gordian using their proprietary system and pricing catalog. The current contract with Gordian has been continuous since 2015 and has been subject to four contract amendments which have collectively increased the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeffrey K. Acuff 925-9570-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 5 to Consulting Services Agreement with The Gordian Group d/b/a The Mellon Group BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) maximum fee under the agreement from $500,000 to $2,500,000 and have extended to contract term through end of 2022. With the Gordian contract set to expire on December 31, 2022, action is required to keep the County’s JOC program functional. Public Works currently has JOC contracts based on the Gordian system with four general contractors. Those contracts extend to various dates in February 2023. The contract duration of these JOC contracts dictates the time period in which Public Works can initiate job orders with each JOC contractor. Projects initiated within the contract duration often last well beyond the termination date of the JOC contract, forming a “tail” to each JOC contract duration. Therefore, it is reasonable to anticipate that the “tail” of the current JOC contracts will extend well into 2024. To cover completion of job order construction projects assigned under the current JOC contracts, the current Gordian contract needs to be amended to cover completion of those jobs. In addition, for Public Works Capital Projects Management Division to effectively administer and construct County Department requested projects, it needs to be able to initiate new job orders under the Gordian system well into 2023. The timeframe required to execute a new contract with a JOC Program Manager and to potentially solicit new JOC contractors for work based on a new job order contracting system is likely six to nine months. Thus, a new system would not be functional until at least summer 2023. To prevent an extended time period without JOC contracting capabilities, Public Works Capital Project Management has initiated a JOC contractor solicitation for contracts to be in place the after expiration of the current set of JOC contracts in February 2023. Public Works will only be able to execute contracts based on this solicitation if there is a Gordian JOC program management contract in place to manage those contracts. Amendment No. 5 will allow the existing JOC program to remain functional until a new JOC Program Management contract can be executed. Eventually, to resolve all job orders executed under the current Gordian contract, this additional amendment is required to cover the “tail” period of those job orders. Concurrent with those projects being resolved under current contract and this amendment, Public Works Capital Projects Management will be initiating a new solicitation for a JOC program manager in Spring 2023, with the timing coordinated for the best transition from one program to another. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If Amendment No. 5 is not approved, it is unclear how, or if, existing construction under executed job orders will be maintained and managed such that the work can be completed. Furthermore, Public Works will be unable to initiate any new construction projects using job order contracting as the delivery method until such time that a new program is established. Both of these operational consequences would result in delay and added cost to multiple construction projects. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Allegis Group Holdings, Inc. (dba TEK Systems, Inc.) in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to provide technical support and temporary technical assistance for the period of November 15, 2022 through December 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost will be offset from charges to user departments for technology services and current projects waiting on resources. (100% User Departments) BACKGROUND: The Department of Information Technology (DoIT) has filled nineteen permanent positions over the last eight months. However, due to attrition, the department still has a high vacancy rate which requires additional temporary technical professionals. DoIT has used the contract between Health Services Department (HSD) and TEK Systems to backfill current vacancies and now DoIT is requesting a separate contract from HSD for temporary help on hard to fill technical positions throughout the county. While the Human Resources Department has actively been recruiting to fill current vacancies, the labor market APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Bunnell, 925-608-4023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marc Shorr, Chief Information Officer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve contract with Allegis Group Holdings, Inc. (dba TEK Systems, Inc.) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) has been inundated with job openings coupled with a shortage of active job seekers, leaving the department with a continued staffing shortage. Over the past several years the technology requests to support County business has increased significantly which has required more staff or different skills sets to both maintain systems and implement new technologies. DoIT as well as other County departments will be able to leverage this contract to achieve their business needs and to support their existing staff where there are vacancies. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Department of Information Technology will continue to function understaffed which will impact project delivery for current and future Countywide projects, service delivery for daily operations, and may impede critical monitoring activity to guard against cyber-attacks. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-430-2 with Jiva Health, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to provide endocrine, diabetes, allergy and sleep medicine services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $2,000,000 over a two-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized medical specialty health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the county. Including but not limited to: endocrine, diabetes allergy and sleep medicine services. This contractor is part of the CCHP Provider Network providing these specialty medical services since January 1, 2022. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-430 with Jiva Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, for the provision of endocrine, diabetes, and allergy specialty services for CCHP members and county recipients the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On April 12, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #77-430-1 with Jiva Health, Inc., effective March 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $25,000, from $2,000,000 to a new payment limit of #2,025,000, for the provision of additional endocrine, diabetes, allergy specialty and sleep medicine services for CCHP members and County recipients, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #77-430-2 will allow the contractor to continue providing these medical specialty services through December 31, 2024. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-430-2 with Jiva Health, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized endocrine, diabetes, allergy, and sleep medicine specialty services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE clarification of Board action on October 18, 2022 (C. 45) which authorized the Chief Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with the Fresh Lifelines for Youth, to correct the term to September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025, to operate its STAY FLY Program to respond to the needs of Contra Costa County’s Transition Aged Youth to prevent further justice system involvement with no change to the contract limit of $1,043,045. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Community Corrections Performance Incentive funds (SB 678) BACKGROUND: Founded in 2000, Fresh Lifelines for Youth is a nonprofit organization that services youth in the juvenile justice system as well as those who are at risk of involvement. They educate youth about the law, they support them to become leaders among their peers, and they provide them with positive mentors and role models. Under this agreement, Fresh Lifelines for Youth will operate its STAY FLY Program APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Chris De Dios, 925-313-4120 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of 10/18/22 Board Order Item C. 45 with Fresh Lifelines for Youth’s STAY FLY Program BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) in Contra Costa County. The STAY FLY Program is a reentry program for ages 18-25 years old that combines law related education, case management/coaching, prosocial events, and systems and community collaboration, to decrease youth’s justice system involvement, increase youth’s academic progress, build youth’s social-emotional learning, mobilize non-traditionally engaged institutions to support youth at risk of justice system involvement, and improve effectiveness of justice and education system practices for Transition Aged Youth. On October 18, 2022 (item C. 45) the Board approved and authorized the Chief Probation Officer to execute a contract with Fresh Lifelines for Youth to operate its STAY FLY Program for an amount not to exceed $1,043,045 with a term September 1, 2022 through October 30, 2025. This Board Order is requesting your approval to change the term of the funding agreement to September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this contract, Contra Costa County’s Transition Aged Youth population will fail to receive adequate support service. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Director, up to $25,000 in transportation and food vouchers from the following: 100 Tri Delta Transit vouchers each with a $27.50 value, totaling $2,750; 99 BART vouchers each with a $6.90 value, totaling $683.10; 131 ARCO vouchers each with a $50 value plus $16.50 for ground shipping, totaling $6,566.50; 100 Walmart grocery vouchers each with a $100 value, totaling $10,000; and 50 Target grocery vouchers each with a $100 value, totaling $5,000 to be provided to low-income clients living with HIV or AIDS and served by the HIV/AIDS and STD Program for the period from December 31, 2022 through June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: The $25,000 expenditure will be funded entirely by a Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) grant award, and no County General Funds are required. BACKGROUND: The HIV/AIDS and STD Program within Contra Costa County’s Public Health Department received a Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) award from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) via the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) to provide food and transportation vouchers to low-income clients living with HIV or AIDS and actively enrolled in Medical Case Management. The provision of nutritious food is essential to well-being and promotes better health outcomes for clients. The provision of non-emergency transportation services through vouchers enables clients to access or be retained in core medical and support services. All vouchers are distributed based on need as well as eligibility requirements outlined by HOPWA. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the HIV/AIDS and STD program would not be fulfilling the goals outlined in HOPWA Grant, and the health and well-being of the clients enrolled in the program would be at risk due to barriers associated with low socioeconomic status. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: April Langro, 925-313-6730 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Transportation and Food Vouchers for HIV/AIDS and STD Program ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #76-697-2 with Daniel T. Oberlin, M.D., an individual, effective November 1, 2022, to amend Contract #76-697-1, to increase the payment limit by $30,000, from $930,000 to a new payment limit of $960,000, with no change in the term of May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $30,000 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Daniel T. Oberlin, M.D. for urology services since May 2020. On April 27, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-697-1 with Daniel T. Oberlin, M.D., for the provision of urology services at CCRMC and Health Centers, in an amount not to exceed $930,000, for the period May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2024. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #76-697-2 will allow contractor to provide additional urology services through April 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the necessary urology services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #76-697-2 with Daniel T. Oberlin, M.D. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #76-506-14 with Robert Liebig, M.D., an individual, effective November 1, 2022, to amend Contract #76-506-12 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #76-506-13), to increase the payment limit by $50,000, from $2,040,000 to a new payment limit of $2,090,000, with no change in the term of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $50,000 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to its patients. CCRMC has contracted with Robert Liebig, M.D. for radiology services since April 2013. On November 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-506-12 with Robert Liebig, M.D., for the provision of radiology services at CCRMC and Health Centers, in an amount not to exceed $1,905,000, for the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. On December 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-506-13, effective December 1, 2020, to increase the contract payment limit by $135,000, from $1,905,000 to a new payment limit of $2,040,000, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 to provide additional radiology services. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #76-506-14 will allow the contractor to provide additional radiology services through December 31, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #76-506-14 with Robert Liebig, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the necessary radiology services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order in the amount of $400,000 with Performance Health Supply, LLC for the purchase of specialized rehabilitation equipment and supplies for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $400,000 over the three-year period between December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: CCRMC Rehabilitation Therapy Services has been using Performance Health Supply, Inc., formerly known as Patterson Medical, since December 2015 to provide specialized rehabilitation equipment and supplies used for occupational, physical, and speech therapy evaluations and treatment of patients who are hospitalized for emergency/acute mental health, and physical needs as well as for patients in the outpatient setting. Performance Health Supply, Inc. recently changed their name to Performance Health Holdings, Inc. dba Performance Health Supply, LLC. Performance Health Supply, LLC supplies wheelchairs, orthotics, clinic equipment, standardized assessments, and various patient supplies. On September 12, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.99 to execute an amendment to purchase order 02778 with Performance Health to increase the payment limit of $140,000 for funding one-year of supplies and equipment. Pricing is provided by CCRMC’s Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) with Vizient, Inc. and Performance Health Supply, Inc. is an awarded supplier with this GPO, MS3030 for medical rehabilitation products for the period of December 1, 2016 through November 30, 2017. On February 12, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.96 to execute an amendment to purchase order 06773 with Performance Health Supply, Inc. to increase the payment amount by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $400,000 for the purchase of specialized rehabilitation equipment and supplies for the period of December 1, 2016 through November 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Lloyd, (925) 370-5753 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order for Performance Health Supply, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of the requested purchase order will allow this vendor to continue providing specialized rehabilitation equipment and supplies to CCRMC Rehabilitation Therapy Services through November 30, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, CCRMC Rehabilitation Therapy Services will not be able to provide therapeutic equipment, supplies, and/or orthotics. This would negatively impact patient’s rehabilitation recovery, safety, and health. Failing to secure these equipment and supplies will result in delays in clinician’s ability to render timely patient care. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-086-145(21) containing mutual indemnification with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $140,000, to provide adult residential care and mental health services for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $140,000 and will be funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment funds. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department has been contracting with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc., since September 2006 to provide residential care and mental health services to adults. This contract meets the social needs of the county’s population by providing a multi-disciplinary treatment program to adults who need active psychiatric treatment, including medication support and individual and group therapy services, as an alternative to hospitalization at a State Hospital. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24-086-145(19) with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $95,000, to provide adult residential care and mental health services for the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On November 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #24-086-145(20) with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc., effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $45,000 to a new payment limit not to exceed $140,000, to provide additional adult residential care and mental health services with no change in the term. Approval of Contract #24-086-145(21) will allow the contractor to continue providing services through December 31, 2023. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-086-145(21) with Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the county’s mental health clients will not receive the inpatient psychiatric treatment they need from this contractor and may require hospitalization at a State Hospital. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #74-356-14 with Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County, a non-profit corporation, effective December 1, 2022, to amend Novation Contract #74-356-13 to increase the payment limit by $50,000 from $136,710 to a new payment limit of $186,710, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $25,000 from $68,355 to a new payment limit of $93,355 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional budgeted expenditures for FY 2022/2023 of up to $50,000 and will be funded 100% by Mental Health Services Act. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing work experience for 200 multicultural youth residing in the Pittsburg/Bay Point communities, as well as programs aimed at increasing educational success among youth who are either at-risk or high-risk of dropping out of school or committing a repeat offense. The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County has been providing Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) services since July 1, 2009. On August 2, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74-356-13 with Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County in the amount of $136,710 for the provision of MHSA-PEI services for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $68,355. Approval of Amendment Agreement #74-356-14 will allow the contractor to provide additional MHSA-PEI services through June 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #74-356-14 with Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, at risk youth from East Contra Costa County will have reduced access to job training and other programs, aimed at increasing educational success. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #74-058-38 with Seneca Family of Agencies, a non-profit corporation, effective November 1, 2022, to amend Novation Contract #74-058-37, to increase the payment limit by $130,000, from $7,655,806 to a new payment limit of $7,785,806, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $65,000, from $3,827,903 to a new payment limit of $3,892,903 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional budgeted expenditures of $130,000 and will be funded by 50% Martinez Unified School District and 50% Federal Medi-Cal. The cumulative funding of the contract's payment limit is 50% Federal Medi-Cal, 46% Mental Health Realignment, 3% Local School Districts, and 1% Probation Department. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing community-based mental health services focusing on Severely Emotionally Disturbed (SED) children, adolescents and their families which will result in positive social and emotional development at home, in the community and greater school success. This contractor has been providing these services to the County since April 2000. On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74-058-37 with Seneca Family of Agencies, in an amount not to exceed $7,655,806 for the provision of school and community-based wraparound specialty mental health services and Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS) for SED children and their families in East, West and Central Contra Costa County, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $3,827,903. Approval of Amendment Agreement #74-058-38 will allow the contractor to provide additional services through June 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5169 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #74-058-38 with Seneca Family of Agencies CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not receive additional mental health services for SED children. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-648-7 with Vickie Lee Scharr, an individual, in an amount not to exceed $260,000, to provide consultation, technical support and planning services with regard to the West Contra Costa Health Care District (WCCHCD) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in expenditures of up to $260,000 and is funded 100% by West Contra Costa Health Care District Funds. BACKGROUND: The contractor has provided consultation, technical support and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer with regard to the transition of the WCCHCD to Contra Costa County as well as having assisted with financial planning and operational improvement. Contractor has been contracting with the County since January 1, 2019. The contractor will provide consultation, technical support, and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer regarding the transition of the WCCHCD to Contra Costa County, as well as assisting with financial planning and operational improvement. Duties will include providing accurate forecasts, data, and information to ensure meeting high risk requirements of the court ordered WCCHD Second Bankruptcy Plan, 2021 Bond Refinance requirements, monitoring pension plan, completing annual financial and pension audits, and providing accurate information to respond to the constituents that the District serves. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-648-6 with Vickie Lee Scharr, in an amount not to exceed $260,000 to provide consultation, technical support and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #23-648-7 will allow the contractor to continue to provide services through December 31, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-648-7 with Vickie Lee Scharr CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to use this contractor’s consultation, technical support and planning services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-646-6 with Eighty20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $339,000, to provide consultation, technical support and planning services to the county with regard to the West Contra Costa Health Care District (WCCHCD) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in annual expenditures of up to $339,000 and will be funded 100% by West Contra Costa Health Care District Funds. BACKGROUND: The contractor has provided professional consultation, technical support and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer, or designee, with regard to the transition of WCCHCD to Contra Costa County as well as having assisted with financial planning and operational improvements. This contractor has been contracting with the county since January 1, 2019. The contractor will provide consultation, technical support, and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer regarding the transition of the WCCHCD to Contra Costa County, as well as assisting with financial planning and operational improvement. Duties will include providing accurate forecasts, data, and information to ensure meeting high risk requirements of the court ordered WCCHD Second Bankruptcy Plan, 2021 Bond Refinance requirements, monitoring pension plan, completing annual financial and pension audits, and providing accurate information to respond to the constituents that the District serves. On January 11, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-646-5 with Eighty20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $339,000, to provide consultation, technical support and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #23-646-6 will allow the contractor to continue to provide services through December 31, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-646-6 with Eighty20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to use this contractor’s expertise in WCCHCD matters. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-583-33 with Specialty Laboratories, Inc. (dba Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute of Valencia), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 to provide outside clinical laboratory testing services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in annual contractual services up to $5,000,000, and will be funded by 80% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I and 20% American Rescue Plan Act. BACKGROUND: CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers have an obligation to provide laboratory testing services to patients. On occasion, the County contracts with outside laboratory testing services in order to provide testing that requires special equipment not available at County facilities. The contractor has been providing outside clinical laboratory testing services for CCRMC since January 2007. On January 19, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-583-30 with Specialty Laboratories, Inc. (dba Quest Diagnostic Nichols Institute), in an amount not to exceed $7,000,000, for the provision of outside clinical laboratory services for CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #26-583-31 effective May 1, 2021, to include additional outside clinical laboratory services, with no change in the payment limit of $7,000,000 or term January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. On May 24, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #26-583-32, effective April 15, 2022, to modify the contract language to include additional third-party billing services for outside clinical laboratory services, with no change in the payment limit of $7,000,000 or original term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5501 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-583-33 Specialty Laboratories, Inc. (dba Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute of Valencia) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #26-583-34 effective, August 10, 2022 to modify the rate schedule to include additional outside laboratory testing services including testing for Monkey Pox virus, with no change in the payment limit of $7,000,000 or to the original term. Approval of Contract #26-583-33 will allow the contractor to continue providing outside clinical laboratory services for CCRMC and Health Centers through December 31, 2023. This contract includes services provided by represented classifications and the County has met its obligations with the respective labor partner(s). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, specialized outside laboratory testing services will not be made available to CCRMC by this contractor, which may result in longer wait times for CCRMC patients. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-698 with Delta Personnel Services, Inc. (dba Guardian Security Agency), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $5,913,009, to provide security guard services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), Contra Costa Health Centers, and COVID-19 testing and immunization sites, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted service expenditures of up to $5,913,009 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contractor provides temporary security workers for the County to safeguard equipment and property, prepare reports, conduct visual checks of area in and around suites, and monitor and respond to unauthorized visitors at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers, and COVID-19 testing and immunization sites. The contractor has been providing services under this contract since September 1999. On March 31, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-352-16 with Delta Personnel Services, Inc. (dba Guardian Security Agency), in an amount not to exceed $3,425,000 to provide security guard services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, including Bay Point Health Center, Pittsburg Health Center and West County Health Center for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #26-352-17 will allow the contractor to continue providing security guard services at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers, and COVID-19 testing and immunization sites through December 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County facilities requiring security guard services will not have access to this contractor’s services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5741 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-352-17 with Delta Personnel Services, Inc. (dba Guardian Security Agency) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #74–373-13 with Martinez Unified School District, an educational institution, in an amount not to exceed $197,073, to provide prevention and early intervention services, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023, in an amount not to exceed $98,536. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in annual expenditures of up to $197,073 and will be fully funded as budgeted by the department in FY 2022-23, by Mental Health Services Act funds. BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing mental health prevention and early intervention services. This contractor has been providing these services to the County since July 1, 2009. In May 2022, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Novation Contract #74-373-12 with Martinez Unified School District in an amount of $191,336 to provide prevention and early intervention services, for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 which included a six month automatic extension in an amount of $95,668 through December 31, 2022. Approval of Novation Contract #74–373-13 will replace the automatic extension under the prior contract and allow the contractor to continue providing services, through June 30, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this novation contract is not approved, there would be no program to provide integrated experiential and leadership opportunities to continuation high school students to promote mental health wellness in ways that are non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74–373-13 with Martinez Unified School District CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) and placement at discharge to a lower level of care. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #22-806-35 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health), a corporation, effective November 1, 2022, to amend Contract #22-806-34, to increase the payment limit by $890,185, from $795,096 to a new payment limit of $1,685,281, with no change in the term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional annual expenditures of up to $890,185 and will be funded by 70% Measure X ($623,995) and 30% County General Funds ($266,190). The cumulative contract's payment limit is funded by 44% Measure X, 32% County General Funds, 16% State grants, and 8% Federal grants. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing organization services including, but not limited to, administrative, technical, medical, dental, mental health and substance abuse for the Public Health’s Emergency Unit and Health Services Emergency Medical Service Unit. Services provided by this contract also include leadership and public health advocacy training. This contractor has been providing consulting and technical assistance services to the County under this contract since April 2001. On July 12, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #22-806-34 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health), in an amount not to exceed $795,096 to provide consulting and technical assistance on community health promotion for the Public Health’s Health Emergency Unit and Health Services Emergency Medical Service Unit, for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Approval of Amendment Agreement #22-806-35 will allow the contractor to provide additional consulting and technical assistance services through June 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #22-806-35 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. (dba Heluna Health) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not receive additional consulting and technical assistance services from contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment Agreement #72-039-16 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels, a non-profit corporation, to amend Novation Contract #72-039-14, effective November 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $3,528, from $462,500 to a new payment limit of $466,028 to include meal quantities and prices with no change in the term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and no change to the automatic extension through September 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional budgeted expenditures of up to $3,528 for fiscal year 2022-2023 and will be funded 100% by Ryan White CARE Act State Funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing home-delivered meals on 250 serving days, to an average of 755 nutritionally at-risk, homebound senior citizens and an average of 53 County residents living with HIV/AIDS, to ensure they receive at least one third of their daily nutritional requirements. This contractor has been providing services to the County since July 1, 2012. On September 13, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #72-039-14 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels, in the amount not to exceed $462,500 for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which included a three-month automation extension period through September 30, 2023. This contract included modifications to County’s Standard Indemnification clause. Approval of Amendment Agreement #72-039-16 will allow the contractor to include meal quantities and pricing for additional home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program through June 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #72-039-16 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, West County’s homebound senior citizens and HIV/AIDS patients will not receive meals which provide at least one third of their daily nutrition. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Clerk-Recorder, or designee, to execute a contract including modified indemnification with Pacific Records Storage in an amount not to exceed $90,000 to provide climate-controlled storage of microfilm records. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost will not exceed $90,000, and is associated with the Clerk-Recorder's dedicated micrographics and modernization fund. The agreement would have no impact to general fund monies. BACKGROUND: The Clerk-Recorder Division first selected Pacific Records Storage in 2018, as they were the least expensive, and most secure climate controlled storage option to accommodate the department's thirteen 2500 lbs. fireproof safes for storage of microfilm records. Pacific Records Storage stored department records in state of the art facilities, utilizes online inventory systems, and provides responsive customer service. The department selected Pacific Records Storage as the best available option for these services through their established track record. Their pricing schedule remains unchanged since the original 2018 agreement. The contract has been approved as to legal form. It differs from the County's standard form in that it limits the contractor's liability to capped rates for losses that result from contractor's negligence and does not require the contractor to provide legal defense for the County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Should the Board not authorize the recommended action , the Department would need to attempt to identify another local and trustworthy provider for climate controlled storage. Costs and liability associated with relocating stored microfilm to a new vendor could be expensive. There would also be the potential for higher rates charged for services, and/or lower quality of services rendered. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-335-7997 Tyler Stull I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:Deborah R. Cooper, Clerk-Recorder Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Pacific Records Storage ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Matrix HG, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 to provide on-call plumbing services at various County buildings, for the period February 1, 2023 through January 31, 2026, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: Facilities Maintenance Budget. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Public Works Facilities Services is responsible for the maintenance and repairs to plumbing systems at all County-owned facilities. Plumbing services include maintenance and repair services for sewage ejector tanks, septic tanks, grease traps, drainage systems, sewage systems, piped water systems, and other plumbing systems, as well as repair or replacement of plumbing fixtures, valves, flushometers, water lines, traps and reciprocating pumps. The existing contract is due to expire on January 31, 2023. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Matrix HG, Inc., a California Corporation, Countywide. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of County Facilities. The Public Works Department recently conducted a formal solicitation for on-call plumbing services. Originally bid on Bidsync #2206-574, Matrix HG, Inc., was the sole contractor awarded for this contract. The Public Works Department is requesting authorization to execute a contract with Matrix HG, Inc. The contract will have a limit of $4,000,000 and a term of three (3) years with the option of two (2) one-year extensions and will pay for services according to the rates set forth in the contract. Matrix HG, Inc., will be able to request rate increases equal to the rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco - Oakland area as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, plus two percent, on each anniversary of the effective date of this contract. The contract will be used on an as-needed basis, with no minimum amount that must be spent. Facilities Services is requesting a contract with Matrix HG, Inc., to be approved for a period covering three years. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, plumbing services with Matrix HG, Inc., will be discontinued. RECOMMENDATION(S): RESCIND Board action of October 11, 2022, Item (C.36), which pertained to a contract with PH Senior Care, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor); and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Contract #24-681-94(7) with PH Senior Care, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,069,440 to provide augmented board and care services for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of these actions will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $1,069,440 and will be funded by 88% Mental Health Realignment ($941,107), 9% Mental Health Services Act revenues ($96,250); and 3% County General Fund ($32,083). BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County's population by providing augmenting room and board care and providing twenty-four hour emergency residential care and supervision to eligible mentally disordered clients, who are specifically referred by the Mental Health program staff and who are served by County Mental Health Services. The Behavioral Health Services Department has been contracting with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), since November 28, 2017 to provide augmented board and care services for mentally ill older adults in Contra Costa County. On October 11, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24-681-94(7) with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), in an amount not to exceed $1,016,244, for the provision of augmented board and care services for mentally ill older adults, for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D, 925-957-5169 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Rescind Prior Board Action Pertaining to Contracted Services with PH Senior Care, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Due to an administrative oversight, an incorrect payment limit was submitted by the Behavioral Health Division. The correct payment limit should be an amount not to exceed $1,069,044 to support the 32 bed facility. Approval this Board Order will rescind the previous action (Board Item, C.36) from the October 11, 2022 meeting that contained the incorrect payment limit, and allow the Department to execute the contract with a payment limit that reflects the intent of the County and the contractor. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommendation is not approved, the prior Board action with an incorrect payment limit will stand and the contract payment limit will not be corrected. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Tri-City Power Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000 to provide routine maintenance and emergency repairs to County Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) units at various County buildings, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: Facilities Maintenance Budget. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Public Works Facilities Services is responsible for the maintenance and emergency repairs of the County's Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) units. These units are put inline with incoming power to the buildings. In the case of a power outage, UPS units will allow the facility to continue functioning without losing power. Facilities Services has several of these units protecting facilities such as computer servers, detention centers and several Health Services facilities. The existing contract expired on October 31, 2022. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for the maintenance and upkeep of County Facilities. The Public Works Department recently conducted a formal solicitation for on-call uninterruptible power supply (UPS) maintenance and repair services. Originally bid on Bidsync # APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925) 313-7082 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Tri-City Power Inc., a California Corporation, Countywide. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 2208-584, Tri-City Power Inc., was the contractor awarded for this contract. The Public Works Department is requesting authorization to execute a contract with Tri-City Power Inc. The contract will have a limit of $600,000 and a term of three (3) years with the option of two (2) one-year extensions and will pay for services according to the rates set forth in the contract. Tri-City Power Inc., will be able to request rate increases equal to the rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco - Oakland area as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, plus two percent, on each anniversary of the effective date of this contract. The contract will be used on an as-needed basis, with no minimum amount that must be spent. Facilities Services is requesting a contract with Tri-City Power Inc., to be approved for a period covering three years. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, UPS services with Tri-City Power Inc., will be discontinued. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. (Vanir), effective December 1, 2022 , to increase the payment limit by $1,740,788 to a new payment limit of $12,990,788 and change the termination date of the contract from May 9, 2023 to May 31, 2025, for construction management services for the West County Re-entry Treatment and Housing Replacement (WRTH) project ($1,385,102), the Security Systems Upgrade project ($280,686), and for smoke control design review services ($75,000) at the West County Detention Facility, 5555 Giant Highway, Richmond. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amendment amount, not to exceed $1,740,788, is part of the approved general purpose revenue/reserves budget (100% General Fund). BACKGROUND: The County awarded a contract to Vanir for construction management services for two (2) sites for a total allotted amount of $6,000,000, with a completion date of three (3) years from the effective date of May 9, 2017. Amendment No. 1, increased the payment limit by $4,004,948, from $6,000,000 to a new payment limit of $10,004,948 and extended the term from May 9, 2020 through May 9, 2022 for Vanir to provide construction management services for the WRTH project. Amendment No. 1 was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 17, 2017. Amendment No. 2 added a subconsultant, Coact Designworks, Inc., with no change to the termination date of May 9, 2022 nor the payment limit of $10,004,948. It was approved by the board of Supervisors June 26, 2018. Amendment No. 3 increased the payment limit by 400,000 to $10,404,948 and extended the term from May 9, 2022 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeffrey K Acuff 925-957-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment No. 5 to CSA with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., for Construction Management Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) through May 9, 2023 and was approved by the Board of Supervisors July 30, 2019. Amendment No. 4 increased the payment limit by $845,052 to $11,250,000 and was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 20, 2020 with no change to the termination date. On December 7, 2021, the Board gave contingent approval to award a design-build contract to Sletten Construction Company for the WRTH project. Amendment No. 1 to the Vanir contract provided for Vanir to provide construction management services for the WRTH project through May 9, 2022, which was the expected project completion date, at that time. Delayed approval for state funding and necessary design scope changes extended the design and construction schedule significantly. Amendment No. 5 will allow Vanir to provide construction management services through design and construction of the WRTH project with its new expected project completion date of late December 2024. The construction drawings are currently 50% complete. Construction is scheduled to begin early May 2023 and be completed in late December 2024. On July 26, 2022, the Board approved a construction contract with Accurate Controls, Inc., for the Security Systems Upgrade project at the Martinez and West County Detention Facilities. Vanir is providing project oversight of the design-build team through design and construction. Accurate Controls is scheduled to complete the construction drawings and immediately begin construction of the conduit raceways in November 2022. ? The State Fire Marshall has a new permitting requirement affecting the WRTH project which requires the County to provide third party independent review of the smoke modeling used in the design for the WRTH project. Smoke modeling verifies that in the event of a fire the air system will quickly and effectively limit the risk of smoke inhalation to the building occupants. The State Fire Marshall has provided a list of approved vendors, none of which is currently under contract with the County. Vanir, by subcontracting with an approved vendor, is able to provide this as a new construction management service within the timeframe required by the project. In accordance with the initial underlying contract and subsequent Amendments 1-4, Vanir is already providing construction management services to the County. In order to provide adequate ongoing construction management services for the described new work, Public Works advises executing Amendment No. 5 with added fee and extended contract term as noted herein. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Public Works Department does not have the staff expertise to provide construction management services for a project of this scale. If the amendment is not approved, the project will be delayed and most likely incur increases in the cost of construction. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with VistAbility in an amount not to exceed $820,000 for packet fulfillment services for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025, Countywide. (Project No. Various) (All Districts) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% User Departments. BACKGROUND: VistAbility provides employment opportunities to developmentally disabled adults. For several years the Public Works Print and Mail Services Division has contracted with VistAbility (formerly known as Commercial Support Services) to fill the low-skill need of assembling informational packets (i.e., packet fulfillment services) for use by the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) as well as other County departments. Due to their involvement with and support of Covered California, the volume of work generated by EHSD still requires services provided by VistAbility. Approval of this Contract will allow VistAbility to continue to provide packet fulfillment services through October 31, 2025. The California Welfare and Institution Code section 19404 (“Section 19404”) authorizes the County to contract for services, including the type of packet fulfillment services that VistAbility provides, from non-profit APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joe Yee, 925-313-2104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 77 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a Contract with VistAbility, a California Nonprofit Corporation, Countywide BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) corporations who operate community rehabilitation programs and meet the criteria of Section 19404 without advertising or calling for bids, provided that the services meet the specifications and needs of the County and are purchased at a fair market price, as determined by the County. VistAbility is a California non-profit corporation. VistAbility meets the requirements of Section 19404 in that: (1) the work to be performed under the contract will primarily (at least 75% of it) be performed by a labor force comprised of persons with disabilities; (2) VistAbility makes elections under the federal Insurance Contributions Act to provide social security and unemployment benefits to its employees; (3) maintains Articles of Incorporation requiring that at least two directors on its Board of Directors are persons with disabilities or the parents, guardians, or conservators of persons with disabilities; and (4) provides disabled employees substantially equally benefits that are provided to VistAbility’s organized employees. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the approval of the Board of Supervisors, sublet fulfillment services will not be performed. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-692-21 with Applied Remedial Services, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $815,252, to provide removal and disposal of hazardous waste materials, in addition to audit reporting and annual in-service staff education services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in annual budgeted expenditures of up to $815,252 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: CCRMC has been contracting with Applied Remedial Services, Inc., since April 2011 to provide removal and disposal of hazardous waste at CCRMC and all the Health Centers to comply with State and Federal Regulations. CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers are monitored on a quarterly basis to ensure hazardous waste is being disposed properly. The contractor has its own laboratory in which the chemist inspects and prepares profile reports and documents for disposal facilities, and waste research with disposal facility. They inventory hazardous; sort and package chemical waste and clean up spilled material. They deliver supplies, package chemical waste from the morgue, pharmacy, public health, pathology and the hazardous waste shed. On November 23, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-692-21 with Applied Remedial Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $707,056, to provide removal and disposal of hazardous waste materials at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On February 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract Amendment Agreement #26-692-22, effective January 1, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $108,196 to a new payment limit of $815,252, to provide additional removal of hazardous waste and chemical services from CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers with no change in the term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5501 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 78 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-692-23 with Applied Remedial Services, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #26-692-23 will allow the contractor to continue to provide removal and disposal of hazardous waste materials through December 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, CCRMC will not have access to this contractor’s services, and will not be compliant with mandatory State and Federal Regulations. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with the Fresh Lifelines for Youth, in an amount not to exceed $448,296 to establish a network of Transition Aged Youth (TAY) service agencies, and design a model for delivering services to TAY through the network of contracted agencies for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Community Corrections Performance Incentive funds (SB 678) BACKGROUND: Founded in 2000, Fresh Lifelines for Youth is a nonprofit organization that services youth in the juvenile justice system as well as those who are at risk of involvement by connecting young people with positive mentors and role models and support them to become leaders among their peers and in their communities. Fresh Lifelines for Youth is one of a very few Bay Area agencies that specialize in working with youth who are currently, formerly, or at risk of being involved in the justice system. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Chris De Dios, 925-313-4120 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 79 To:Board of Supervisors From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Fresh Lifelines for Youth (Transition Aged Youth Network) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Under this agreement, Fresh Lifelines for Youth will establish a network of Transition Aged Youth (TAY) service agencies, and design a model for delivering services to TAY through the network of contracted agencies. The goal of the network is to ensure that every TAY on Probation in the County has access to a comprehensive set of services and programs that will increase self-sufficiency, while reducing the conditions for further justice system involvement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this contract, Contra Costa County’s Transition Aged Youth population will fail to receive adequate support service. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, an amendment to the Participating Addendum and blanket purchase order with W.W. Grainger, Inc., to extend the termination date from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2023, with no change to the payment limit or remaining terms, for supplies, parts and equipment required by County departments. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as this action is only to extend the term. Product costs are paid by County Departments. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Purchasing Services is requesting an extension of County Wide purchase order # 023999 issued to WW Grainger, Inc., to continue to purchase Maintenance, Repair and Operating Supplies under the OMNIA Cooperative Agreement with guaranteed pricing, tiered rebate incentives, discounts on thousands of products and no minimum purchase requirements. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Shehorn, 925-957-2495 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 80 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent , or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, an amendment to an agreement with W.W. Grainger, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval of the extension to PO 023999, County Departments will pay full price on the products they order today, with no purchasing incentives or rebates back to the County’s General Fund. ATTACHMENTS Amendment No.1 To The Participating Addendum Contract Addendum Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) Supplies, Parts, Equipment, Material & Related Services 1st June for RECOMMENDATION(S): (1) APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Contra Costa County (County) Public Works Director, or designee, to execute an amendment to the reimbursement agreement between the County and The Watershed Project (TWP) to pass through an additional $41,000 in State grant funding and to revise certain dates for the North Richmond Watershed Connections Project (Project). (2) APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Public Works Director, or designee, to execute an amendment to the reimbursement agreement between the County and Urban Tilth (UT) to revise certain dates for the Project. (3) AUTHORIZE the County Public Works Director, or designee, to execute any further amendments to the reimbursement agreements that either do not increase the reimbursement limits to TWP or UT or that involve additional State grant funding. FISCAL IMPACT: The Project is funded by a State grant from the State Coastal Conservancy (SCC). The State grant has been amended to provide $41,000 in additional funding for the Project, thereby increasing the total State funding from $884,000 to $925,000, which includes $78,000 to the County for Project administration. Project No. 7517-6W7257 (100% SCC Grant Funds) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michele Mancuso, (925) 313-2236 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michele Mancuso, County Watershed Program, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 81 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Amendments to Reimbursement Agreements with Urban Tilth and The Watershed Project for the North Richmond Watershed Connections Project. BACKGROUND: On October 8, 2019, the Board authorized the Public Works Director, or designee, to accept a State grant for $884,000 and to execute a grant agreement between the SCC and the County for the design, construction, and long-term maintenance of the Project in the North Richmond community. The County is working in collaboration with TWP and UT to plan, design, and construct the grant-funded Project. On January 11, 2022, the Board approved and authorized the execution of an agreement between the County and TWP for the design, construction, and long-term maintenance of Component 3 of the Project, consisting of wayfinding and interpretative elements along Wildcat Creek and the Watershed Connection Route in North Richmond, and the establishment by TWP of an “Adopt a Tree” program in the North Richmond community. The County/TWP agreement provided for the pass-through to TWP of up to $150,000 in funding from the SCC grant. On March 1, 2022, the Board approved and authorized the execution of an agreement between the County and UT for the design and installation of Component 2 of the Project, consisting of sidewalks, bike lanes, and stormwater infrastructure in the North Richmond community. The County/UT agreement provided for the pass-through to UT of up to $422,000 in funding from the SCC grant. Effective April 25, 2022, SCC amended the grant agreement with the County to provide $41,000 in additional funding for additional work to be performed by TWP, consisting of increasing Tribal engagement in the planning process for the Project and providing additional video and audio Indigenous storytelling elements in signage constructed as part of the wayfinding and interpretive elements. The SCC grant amendment also extended the dates for installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements. To implement the increased State grant funding and the date changes in the SCC grant agreement, the County and TWP would like to amend the County/TWP agreement to provide $41,000 more in pass-through funding to TWP (i.e., increase the maximum reimbursement to TWP from $150,000 to $191,000) and to revise the dates for installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements. Staff recommends that the Board approve an amendment entitled “First Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement—Installation of Wayfinding Elements and Establishment of ‘Adopt a Tree’ Program in North Richmond” and authorize the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute the amendment for the County. To implement the date changes in the SCC grant agreement, the County and UT would like to amend the County/UT agreement to revise the dates for installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements, with no change to the maximum reimbursement to UT, which shall remain at $422,000. Staff recommends that the Board approve an amendment entitled “First Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement—Installation of Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Stormwater Infrastructure in North Richmond” and authorize the County Public Works Director, or designee, to execute the amendment for the County. These two amendments have resulted from an increase in State grant funding and it is possible that the SCC grant agreement may be further amended to provide additional grant funding or to modify dates or other grant conditions. To accommodate that potential situation and to minimize the need to return such routine matters to the Board, the two amendments contain language allowing administrative approval of any further amendments to the County/TWP and the County/UT agreements that either do not increase the reimbursement limits to TWP or UT or that involve additional State grant funding. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the amendments are not approved by the Board, the County, TWP, and UT would not be able to take advantage of the $41,000 in additional State funding or be able to implement the revised dates in the State grant for installation, invoicing, and long-term maintenance of the Project improvements. ATTACHMENTS UT Amendment NRWCP TWP Amendment NRWCP 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANES AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IN NORTH RICHMOND This Amendment is entered into effective November , 2022, by and between the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and Urban Tilth, a nonprofit public benefit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (“Urban Tilth”). RECITALS A. The Parties have previously entered into a Reimbursement Agreement dated March 1, 2022 (“Agreement”) for the design, construction, and maintenance by UT of certain Project improvements (sidewalk, bike lane, and stormwater infrastructure) in the North Richmond Community. B. SCC has now amended the grant to County (Grant Agreement 19-111) to: (1) provide additional funding of $41,000 to be passed through to another nonprofit (The Watershed Project) that is constructing other grant-funded improvements; and (2) extend the dates for completion of installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements. C. To accommodate the additional grant funding and to implement the extension of the dates for completion of installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements, the Parties now wish to amend the Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. In Section 1 (Term) of the Agreement, the term is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044. 2. Section 10.B (Reimbursement to Urban Tilth) is revised to read as follows: “During the construction work, Urban Tilth shall submit to County for reimbursement periodic invoices detailing eligible Project costs at a frequency and in a form and detail approved by County. For Urban Tilth staff charges, the invoices shall describe the work performed and shall list classifications, dates, hours, and rates, which shall be consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” (Schedule of Fees) attached to this Agreement. County will review the periodic invoices and submit a reimbursement payment, less 5% for contract retention, to Urban Tilth within 30 days of receipt of each invoice. All invoices for Project work, including the periodic invoices and the final invoice, must be submitted by Urban Tilth and received by the County no later than the following deadlines: (a) $242,000 of the Project work must be invoiced to the County by December 15, 2022; the remaining $180,000 of the 2 Project work must be completed and invoiced to the County by November 15, 2023. Otherwise, if any invoice is received after those deadlines, it may not qualify for reimbursement from the SCC grant. County will review the final invoice and submit a reimbursement payment to Urban Tilth within 35 days of County’s acceptance of Project completion or County’s receipt of the final invoice and other items listed in Subsection C below, whichever is later. The final reimbursement payment will include all withheld retention, unless stop payment notices, bond claims, or other claims have been filed or asserted against the Project, in which case County will continue to hold retention as necessary to cover such claims.” 3. Section 10.C (Reimbursement to Urban Tilth) is revised to read as follows: “Within 60 days of County’s acceptance of Project completion, but in no event later than January 15, 2024, Urban Tilth shall submit the following items to County: (a) a detailed final report listing all Project costs; (b) as-built drawings in ACAD reviewed and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of California; and (c) all contractor and manufacturers’ warranties pertaining to the Project work.” 4. In Section 11 (Completion Deadline) of the Agreement, the deadline for Urban Tilth’s completion of installation of the Project is extended from December 31, 2022 to November 15, 2023. The end date for Urban Tilth’s maintenance of the Project improvements is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044 (new SCC grant termination date). 5. In Section 14 (Ownership and Maintenance of Project Improvements), the end date for Urban Tilth’s maintenance of the Project improvements is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044 (new SCC grant termination date). 6. Section 22 (Amendment) is revised to read as follows: “This Agreement may be amended in writing at any time with the approval of both parties. For administrative amendments that do not increase the reimbursement limit to Urban Tilth specified in Section 10.D above or that involve additional grant funding provided by SCC, the approval and signatures of County’s Public Works Director or his designee and Urban Tilth’s Executive Director shall be sufficient to bind the parties.” 7. Except as amended above, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. [Signature page follows] 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California By: Brian Balbas, Public Works Director URBAN TILTH, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation By: Name: Dana Perls Title: Chairperson of the Board By: Name: Jen Loy Title: Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY ANN MASON, County Counsel By: David F. Schmidt Deputy County Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Katharine G. Wellman Special Counsel for Urban Tilth 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT INSTALLATION OF WAYFINDING ELEMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF "ADOPT A TREE" PROGRAM IN NORTH RICHMOND This Amendment is entered into effective November , 2022, by and between the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and The Watershed Project, a nonprofit public benefit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("TWP"). RECITALS A. The Parties have previously entered into a Reimbursement Agreement dated January 27, 2022 (“Agreement”) for the design, construction, and maintenance by TWP of certain wayfinding elements along Wildcat Creek and the Watershed Connection Route in North Richmond and the establishment and implementation by TWP of an “adopt a tree” program in the North Richmond Community. B. SCC has now amended the grant to County (Grant Agreement 19-111) to: (1) provide additional funding of $41,000 to be passed through directly to TWP and; (2) extend the dates for completion of Project installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements. The additional funding is to support increasing Tribal engagement in the planning process for the Project and increasing additional video and audio Indigenous storytelling elements in signage constructed under Task 4.3 of the Work Program, Watershed Connections Wayfinding and Interpretive Elements. C. To implement the additional grant-funded work, the Parties now wish to amend the Agreement to add the above work, to increase the maximum reimbursement to TWP, and to extend the dates for completion of installation, invoicing, and maintenance of the Project improvements. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. In Section 1 (Term) of the Agreement, the term is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044. 2. In Section 2 (Improvements), the description of the wayfinding elements is amended to add the following additional work to be performed by TWP: increasing Tribal engagement in the planning process for the Project and providing additional video and audio Indigenous storytelling elements in signage constructed under Task 4.3 of the Work Program, Watershed Connections Wayfinding and Interpretive Elements. 2 3. In Section 10.A and D (Reimbursement to TWP), the maximum reimbursement to TWP is increased from $150,000 to $191,000 to reflect the $41,000 increase in SCC grant funding. 4. Section 10.B (Reimbursement to TWP) is revised to read as follows: “During the construction work, TWP shall submit to County for reimbursement periodic invoices detailing eligible Project costs at a frequency and in a form and detail approved by County. County will review the periodic invoices and submit a reimbursement payment, less 5% for contract retention, to TWP within 30 days of receipt of each invoice. All invoices for Project work, including the periodic invoices and the final invoice, must be submitted by TWP and received by the County no later than November 15, 2023. Otherwise, if any invoice is received after that deadline, it may not qualify for reimbursement from the SCC grant. County will review the final invoice and submit a reimbursement payment to TWP within 35 days of County’s acceptance of Project completion or County’s receipt of the final invoice and other items listed in Subsection C below, whichever is later. The final reimbursement payment will include all withheld retention, unless stop payment notices, bond claims, or other claims have been filed or asserted against the Project, in which case County will continue to hold retention as necessary to cover such claims.” 5. Section 10.C (Reimbursement to TWP) is revised to read as follows: “Within 60 days of County’s acceptance of Project completion, but in no event later than January 15, 2024, TWP shall submit the following items to County: (a) a detailed final report listing all Project costs; (b) as-built drawings in ACAD reviewed and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of California; and (c) all contractor and manufacturers’ warranties pertaining to the Project work.” 6. In Section 11 (Completion Deadline) of the Agreement, the deadline for TWP’s completion of installation of the Project is extended from December 31, 2022 to November 15, 2023. The end date for TWP’s maintenance of the Project improvements is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044 (new SCC grant termination date). 7. In Section 14 (Ownership and Maintenance of Project Improvements), the end date for TWP’s maintenance of the Project improvements is extended from December 31, 2042 to January 31, 2044 (new SCC grant termination date). 8. Section 22 (Amendment) is revised to read as follows: “This Agreement may be amended in writing at any time with the approval of both parties. For administrative amendments that do not increase the reimbursement limit to TWP specified in Section 10.D above or that involve additional grant funding provided by SCC, the approval and signatures of County’s Public Works Director or his designee and TWP’s Executive Director shall be sufficient to bind the parties.” 9. Except as amended above, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California By: Brian Balbas, Public Works Director THE WATERSHED PROJECT, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation By: Name: Carrie Strohl Title: Board Chair By: Name: Paul Randall Title: Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY ANN MASON, County Counsel By: David F. Schmidt Deputy County Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Legal Counsel RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-668-1 with United Language Group, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $705,000 for translation services of written documents for County’s Health Services Department for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $705,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing translation services of written documentation for County’s Health Services Department including but not limited to Contra Costa Health Plan notifications, description of benefits, patient information and medical records. The Health Services Department is mandated to provide written documents in threshold languages for County’s patients. On December 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-668, in an amount of $705,000, to translate written documents for the Health Services Department for the period from December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2022. Approval of Contract #23-668-1 will allow the contractor to continue providing these services through November 30, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring written translation services will not have access to this contractor’s services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 82 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-668-1 with United Language Group, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #26-445-20 with Aaron Hayashi, M.D., Inc., a corporation, effective November 1, 2022, to amend Contract #26-445-19, to increase the payment limit by $75,000, from $2,115,000 to a new payment limit of $2,190,000, with no change in the term of October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $75,000 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to their patients. CCRMC has contracted with Dr. Hayashi for radiology services since July 2007. On October 5, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-445-19 with Aaron K. Hayashi, M.D., Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,115,000, for the provision of radiology services including consultation, on-call coverage and interpretation of Computed Tomography (CT) Scans, Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs), Ultrasounds, invasive procedures and plain films for CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-445-20 will allow the contractor to provide additional radiology services through September 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the additional specialty radiology services needed for patient care will not be available and will result in increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D. 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 83 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #26-445-20 with Aaron Hayashi, M.D., Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment Agreement #23-580-3 with San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, a government agency, effective December 14, 2022, to amend Agreement #23-580-1 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #23-580-2), to increase the payment limit by $404,000, from $464,362 to a new payment limit of $868,362, and extend the termination date from December 14, 2022 to December 15, 2025, to reimburse San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District for additional provisions of electronic patient care records hosting and support services for the Contra Costa EMS System. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in additional contractual service expenditures of up to $404,000 over an additional 3-year period and will be funded 100% by CSA EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is for the County to reimburse San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (District) for its payments to Definitive Networks, Inc., who will provide electronic patient care records hosting and support services for certain County fire protection agencies. Reimbursements will be made with Measure H funds. San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District has been providing service to the County under this contract since December 15, 2015. On November 1, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #23-580-1 with the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District in an amount not to exceed $295,200 to provide electronic patient care records hosting and support services for the period from December 15, 2016 through December 14, 2019. On March 26, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #23-580-2 with the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, effective March 1, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $169,162 to a new payment limit of $464,362 and extend the termination date from December 14, 2019 to December 14, 2022, to provide additional electronic patient care records hosting and support services for the Contra Costa EMS System. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marshall Bennet, 925-646-5454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 84 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #23-580-3 with San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Amendment Agreement #23-580-3 will allow the contractor to provide additional electronic patient care records hosting and support services through December 15, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, Contra Costa County’s EMS Systems will not receive additional enhancements supporting education, training, patients safety and quality improvements for its providers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #76-681-3 with GE Precision Healthcare, LLC, a limited liability company, effective December 27, 2022, to amend Contract #76-681 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #76-681-1 and #76-681-2), to increase the payment limit by $223,704, from $4,588,321 to a new payment limit of $4,812,025, with no change in the term of January 29, 2020 through January 28, 2025 for additional maintenance and repair services of medical imaging equipment and systems. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in additional expenditures of up to $223,704 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Additional rates) BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) has been contracting with GE Precision Healthcare, LLC, since January 2020 to provide maintenance and repair services to various medical imaging equipment and systems located at CCRMC, West County Health Center, Pittsburg Health Center and Antioch Health Center. Medical imaging equipment/systems are technology driven and it's important to have them serviced by service engineers who are specialized and meet high standards for servicing these units. This contractor’s service engineers are highly qualified and trained on the imaging equipment/systems manufactured by General Electric Healthcare. Ninety (90) percent of the imaging equipment/systems are manufactured by General Electric Healthcare. The contractor has a large workforce which enables them to provide timely and efficient service support. On December 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-681 with GE Precision Healthcare, LLC in an amount not to exceed $3,938,350 for the provision of maintenance and repair services to various medical imaging equipment and systems located at CCRMC, West County Health Center, Pittsburg Health Center and Antioch Health Center for the period January 29, 2020 through January 28, 2025. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-957-5741 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 85 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #76-681-3 with GE Precision Healthcare, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On May 26, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-681-1, to increase the payment limit by $135,710 to a new payment limit of $4,074,060 to provide additional maintenance and repair services for medical imaging equipment and systems with no change in the term. On July 27, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #76-681-2 to increase the payment limit by $514,261 to a new payment limit of $4,588,321 to provide additional maintenance and repair services for medical imaging equipment and systems with no change in the term. Approval of Amendment #76-781-3 will allow the contractor to provide additional maintenance and repair services of new medical imaging equipment and systems through January 28, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the County will not have access to this contractor’s services for maintenance and repair services of new medical imaging equipment and systems. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a purchase order amendment with Caltronics Business Systems to increase the payment limit by $150,000 to a new total of $349,900 for copier rentals and managed print services with no change to the term. FISCAL IMPACT: Increase of the payment limit of $150,000 for this purchase order is included in the FY 22-23 EHSD Adopted Budget. The total payment limit is 50% Federal and 50% State funded with no county match. BACKGROUND: Caltronics Business Systems was selected as a result of the competitive bid process held by Contra Costa County Public Works on behalf of all County departments. On July 23, 2019, your Board approved and authorized the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the County, Master Agreement MFD-MA 2019-02 with J.J.R. Enterprises, Inc., dba Caltronics Business Systems for copier rentals and managed print services between APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 86 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment to Caltronics Business Systems Purchase Order F018108 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2030, as recommended by the Public Works Director. The Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department, approved Purchase Order #F018102 with Caltronics Business Systems with a payment limit of $199,900, for the term February 20, 2020, through February 19, 2023. The Department is requesting approval to increase the payment limit by $150,000 to $349,900. The Community Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department is using Caltronics Business Systems for copier rentals and managed print services at its administrative office and childcare sites. The request to increase the payment limit by $150,000 is to fund the cost of the copier rentals and managed print services for the full term of Purchase Order #F08102. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this increase amount, Community Services Bureau will not be able to reimburse Caltronics Business Systems for services already rendered. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes – Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in Schools, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing, These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Axon Enterprise, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $12,503,168 for the purchase of body-worn cameras, in-car camera systems, storage, and software for the term of January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2032. FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of agreement is $12,503,168; annual cost is approximately $1.2 million. By entering into a 10-year agreement, the Office of the Sheriff will be saving $5 million over the term of the agreement.The Board of Supervisors has approved an allocation of Measure X funding for this program in the amount of $1.3 million annually through June 30, 2024. The Office of the Sheriff will be requesting continued Measure X funding at a future date. In the event the Board of Supervisors does not approve continued funding, the Office of the Sheriff will attempt to identify other funding sources. BACKGROUND: Axon has been providing body-worn cameras for 10 years, evidence management software for 13 years, and in-car camera systems for 6 years, having done so for law enforcement APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Abigail Balana, 925-655-0008 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 87 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Axon Enterprise, Inc. Body-Worn Cameras and In-Car Camera Systems BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) agencies across the United States and in numerous other countries. Axon was selected as the vendor which would provide the Office of the Sheriff with the greatest value after a request for proposal (RFP) process in which several vendors submitted bids were evaluated. This contract will allow the Office of the Sheriff to increase transparency, accountability, and thoroughly investigate citizen complaints, while also collecting video evidence that can be used in future prosecutions. Under the terms of the agreement, Axon’s liability is limited to the amount paid by County in the twelve months preceding the claim, except with respect to a breach of County data, which is limited to $5,000,000. County may only terminate the agreement for an uncured breach by Axon or the board of supervisors’ failure to appropriate funds for amounts due under the agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Office of the Sheriff will lose the ability to increase transparency, reduce citizen complaints, and enhance evidence collection used for prosecution. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee, to purchase on behalf of the Health Services Department, up to $18,000 in gift cards as follows: 200 Amazon gift cards each with a $30 value, totaling $6,000; 200 Target gift cards each with a $30 value, totaling $6,000; 200 Safeway gift cards each with a $30 value totaling, $6,000 to support activities as allowed by Community Mental Health Services Block Grant and Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act for the First Hope Program for the period from December 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023, as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: This $18,000 expenditure will be entirely funded by Community Mental Health Services Block Grant/Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA). BACKGROUND: The First Hope Program uses evidence-based treatments, modeled after RAISE/NAVIGATE, to promote client-driven, recovery-oriented services based on engaging with clients' goals and promoting functioning, rather than focusing solely on symptom reduction. Clients and families are provided with an array of services suited to their individualized needs across the duration of their treatment. The First Hope Program services include, but are not limited to facilitating groups which promote healthy eating habits to assist with the client's overall health, job workshops which assist with providing proper interview and job etiquette, and peer mentoring groups which are designed to engage clients to participate in the First Hope Program groups and other various activities. The First Hope Program will distribute gift cards to support activities as allowed by Community Mental Health Services Block Grant/Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the grant funding would go unspent, and the funds would return to the funder. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Yat-Ming Jude Leung, (925) 608-6573 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 88 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Gift Cards for Clients of the First Hope Program RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a blanket purchase order, with Ray A. Morgan Company, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $2,522,448, to provide copier rentals and managed print services for the period December 23, 2022 through December 22, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Payment limit increase of $2,522,448 for this purchase order, of which $420,408 is included in the FY 22-23 EHSD Adopted Budget with the remaining amount of $2,102,040 to be included in the FY 23-24 and FY 24-25 Recommended Budget. Funding ratios are 60% Federal, 35% State, and 5% County. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this board order is to request a new purchase order with Ray A. Morgan Company, LLC. This vendor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process held by Contra Costa County Public Works on behalf of all County departments, and coincides with APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Emilia Gabriele, 925-608-4810 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Emilia Gabriele C. 89 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Ray A. Morgan Multifunction Copier Services, Managed Print Services, and Printer Maintenance and Supplies Blanket Purchase Order BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the Master agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 23, 2019 (Item C 44). Ray A. Morgan currently provides copier rentals and managed print service, including multi-function copier services, maintenance and supplies, for the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD). The Department is requesting approval for a new Purchase Order in an amount not to exceed $2,522,448 with Ray A. Morgan Company, LLC for the period December 23, 2022 through December 22, 2025. The Department is consolidating copier rentals and managed print services for all its bureaus under the one Purchase Order with Ray A. Morgan Company, LLC. Beginning in spring 2023, the Purchase Order includes copier rentals and managed print services for the Community Services Bureau currently being serviced by Caltronics. The terms of the master agreement, as previously amended, will be incorporated by reference in the purchase order, and those terms will govern over any conflicting terms of the purchase order. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable Multi-Function copier services to all EHSD programs, clients, and infrastructure staff. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Consulting Services Agreement (contract) with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000, to provide on-call project management services for the period December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2025, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: Work performed under this contract is 100% funded by Federal, Local, State and/or General Funds. (100% Various Funds) BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department is involved in various projects in the County, which require project management services for capital improvement projects. After a solicitation process, this firm was selected as one of five firms to provide project management services on an “on-call” basis. The consultant will augment Public Works staff during busy times when extra help is needed or when in-house expertise is not available. This on-call contract will be in effect for three years. Government code section 31000 authorizes the County to enter into contract for consultant services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Carl Roner - (925) 313-2213 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque- Engineering Services, Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Scott Anderson - Special Districts, Jeff Acuff-Capital Projects C. 90 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Consulting Services Agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc., Countywide. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the contract is not approved, necessary capital projects may not be completed in a timely manner, which may jeopardize funding and delay design and construction of various capital projects. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the 2021/22 Animal Benefit Fund Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. This is an informational report with recommendations that will not affect the amount of funds allocated for animal services and programs, but rather how donated funds can be expended. BACKGROUND: In 1988, the Animal Services Department created the Animal Benefit Fund. The purpose of the Animal Benefit Fund (ABF) is to allow the Animal Services Department to receive donations from individuals, animal welfare organizations and businesses, to support animal health and welfare projects. On April 21, 2015, during fiscal year 2015/16 budget hearings, the Board of Supervisors formally referred to the Internal Operations Committee (IOC) a review of the Animal Benefit Fund. On April 19, 2016, The Board of Supervisors approved, at the recommendation of the IOC, expansion of the Animal Benefit Fund approved uses (see attached Archived Board Order dated 4/19/16) and directed the Animal Services Director to report annually to the IOC about the impact of the Animal Benefit Fund on the community and families, creating a new standing referral. The IOC has previously received three such reports for FYs 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21. Since the creation of the Animal Benefit Fund more than 30 years ago, monetary contributions and donations for services and supplies for animal welfare have provided additional support for unfunded needs of the animals impounded at the shelter and in our community. These donations have come in the form of grants or “soft ask” gifts over the counter or from the Animal Services Department website. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 655-2056 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: Animal Services Director, CAO (Chan), CAO (Enea) C. 91 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:2021/22 Animal Benefit Fund Report BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On December 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. 2020/329. This authorized the Department Director to implement the following programs within the Animal Benefit Fund: Medical Assistance Program: This program is for medical assistance and emergency veterinary care for animals that are in the County's jurisdiction and/or have been accepted into the County shelter’s care. Funds will be used for medical care over and above the mandated medical care for animals in the care of the shelter and who need further assistance to be made available for adoption or released to a transfer agency. Funds may also be used to provide necessary medical care to an animal to help keep the animal out of the shelter. 1. Humane Education Program: This program helps to support humane education services in our county either by bringing people into County shelter or taking County education programs “on the road” into the community. Humane Education support may also be used to help pet owners resolve behavioral problems that might otherwise cause them to give up their pet, to help shelter animals with behavioral issues that might keep them from being easily adopted, and to create humane education programs for school age children. 2. Shelter Intervention Program: Often, families in a crisis turn to surrendering their pet to a shelter due to lack of financial resources. The intervention program helps to provide resources to keep animals in their homes. Examples of intervention tools: spay/neuter, behavior/training assistance, fence repair and grooming. This program may also be used to help domestic violence victims or seniors on limited incomes to keep their pets in their lives when they may otherwise have had to consider relinquishment due to lack of funds for basic daily needs or medical concerns. 3. Spay Neuter and Wellness Program: This program would make spay/neuter, vaccinations, and microchips more affordable and accessible in Contra Costa County. Contra Costa Animal Services will accomplish this by establishing partnerships and developing mobile programs to reach into the areas of our county in greatest need, targeting the species/breeds of animals most likely to be found in our shelter, and supporting healthy community cats through TNR/RTF (trap-neuter-return / return- to-field) and Working Cat Adoptions. 4. ANNUAL REPORT For FY 2021/22, the Department allocated $210,000 for Animal Benefit Fund (ABF) Programs. The ABF funds are not intended to replace General Funds, rather they are to supplement and enhance our care for animals and support of the public. The table below details the allocation, adjustment, and balances for each ABF program for FY 2021/22: ABF Fund 133200 Amount Beginning balance $350,381 21/22 Expenditures $126,140 21/22 Revenue ($323,727) Ending Balance:$547,968 Org ABF Program Appropriation Expenditures Remaining Balance 3349 General $100,000 $35,701 $64,299 3350 Medical Assistance Program $10,000 $7,766 $2,234 3351 Humane Education Program $0 0 $0 3352 Shelter Intervention Program $10,000 $8,899 $1,101 3354 Spay and Neuter Program $90,000 $73,774 $16,226 Total:$210,000 $126,140 $83,860 Org Type of Funding Estimated Revenue Collected Variance 9181 Pooled Earned Interest $0 $2,662 $2,662 9965 Donations $160,000 $153,735 ($6,265) 9965 Spay and Neuter $0 $65,280 $65,280 9966 Grants $100,000 $102,050 $2,050 Totals:$260,000 $323,727 $63,727 The key factors that affected the FY 2021/22 ABF budget were: Underutilization of community partners spay/neuter contracts have continued to impact our service delivery. This is due to the COVID-19 pandemics strain on availability of medical supplies. 1. The Department did not meet its donation revenue goal estimated at $160,000 by less than $7,000 for FY 2021/22. The FY 2021/22 ABF donations did exceed our FY 2019/20 donation goal of $150,000. We do expect to receive a higher donation pool for FY 2022/23. 2. The Animal Benefit Fund (ABF) received $65,280 in allocations for the Spay and Neuter program. These funds were transferred from the Animal Services Department budget. 3. ATTACHMENTS FY 2021/22 Animal Benefit Fund Presentation ARCHIVED DOCUMENT: April 2016 Board Order Expanding Animal Benefit Fund Program CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES ANIMAL BENEFIT FUND PRESENTATION FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 OCTOBER 26, 2022 The Animal Benefit Fund (ABF) The ABF was established by the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors in 1988 as a way to accept donations from compassionate individuals who want to help our shelter animals. All funds are used to enhance the care and well-being of animals in our shelters and to enhance programs of humane welfare and education for the residents of Contra Costa County. In FY 21/22, ABF funds were allocated to a range of projects and focused on three primary funding areas: ▪Medical Assistance Program ▪Spay/Neuter & Wellness Program ▪Shelter Intervention Program Medical Assistance Program The Panda’s Gift Program was created to provide medical services to animals in need that have conditions beyond CCAS’ ability to treat. In partnership with East Bay SPCA, CCAS applied $10,000 in Medical Assistance funding to help pets with advanced medical needs beyond our shelter’s ability to treat. In FY 21/22, Medical Assistance funds were utilized to help treat numerous pets and a variety of medical conditions, including orthopedic injuries, enucleations, and amputations, among others. Medical Assistance Program Joe-Joe came to CCAS in March of 2022 with a severely fractured pelvis. He needed surgery to repair his pelvis and to prevent chronic pain. Thanks to the Medical Assistance Fund and a local veterinary hospital, Joe-Joe was able to get the advanced surgery he needed. He was then transferred to a local rescue group to recover. Since then, Joe-Joe has been adopted and is living his best life in the Monterey Bay area! Medical Assistance Program The Spay/Neuter Assistance Program was created to increase opportunities for low-cost spay and neuter services in Contra Costa County. Working with our collaborative partners Animal Fix Clinic, Paw Fund, Cat Support Network and Pawsitively SAFE, ABF funds were utilized to support low-cost spay and neuter surgeries across the County through local clinics, Trap, Neuter, Release (TNR) programs, and mobile spay/neuter events. Spay/Neuter & Wellness Program In FY 21/22, the Spay & Neuter Assistance fund helped over 800 residents of Contra Costa County receive low-cost spay and neuter surgeries for pets and community cats. In addition to spay and neuter surgeries, animals were also provided vaccines and microchips, if they were needed. 4 PARTNERS 854 Total Surgeries 772 Total Vaccines Administered 168 Microchips Implanted Spay/Neuter & Wellness Program In FY 21/22, Animal Fix Clinic utilized Spay & Neuter Assistance funding to provide free and low- cost spay and neuter services to 165 pets and community cats. Every animal also received vaccines, microchips, and flea medication, if needed, to ensure they can live their happiest and healthiest lives. Spay/Neuter & Wellness Program Pawsitively S.A.F.E. utilized Spay & Neuter Assistance funding in FY 21/22 to spay and neuter 272 cats and kittens in Contra Costa County! In addition to the spay and neuter assistance they provide, Pawsitively S.A.F.E. administered over 400 vaccines to cats in Contra Costa County and helped local communities address community cat overpopulation through services and education. Shelter Intervention The Shelter Intervention Fund was created to assist Contra Costa County residents who want to keep their pets out of the shelter and at home where they belong. The fund is administered though the CCAS Pet Support Program. The program focuses on providing resources and assistance, such as free or low-cost spay/neuter surgeries, vaccinations, temporary boarding and much more, to County residents who are at risk of surrendering their pet. During FY 21/22, Pet Support funding was able to help County residents keep pets out of the shelter and in safe, loving homes. The real measure of the Pet Support Program’s success can be found in the stories, photos and thank you cards we receive from people whom we’ve helped keep their pet in their family. Shelter Intervention Pablo came to the CCAS Pet Support Program with complications from a broken pelvis after being attacked by another dog. The owner had taken Pablo to the veterinarian after the attack, but the needed amputation surgery was much more than the owner could afford. The owner desperately wanted to keep Pablo but was at risk of surrendering Pablo because they could not afford the surgery. Utilizing the CCAS Pet Support Program, Pablo was able to receive the amputation surgery provided through Pet Support Program partner East Bay SPCA and remains happily in his loving home today. What Our Partners Say “Animals in Contra Costa County, and their owners and caregivers, are lucky to have the Animal Benefit Fund. We have seen more and more people -who all want to do the right thing for their animals -struggle with finances in the post-pandemic economy. The support Animal Fix Clinic receives through the ABF means we can help more of those people help their animals. Seeing the animals return to the community happy and healthy is what motivates us, pandemic or not.” -Dr. Jean Goh, DVM, Animal Fix Clinic Medical Director “We very much appreciate the subsidy assistance from Contra Costa County. The cost of our spay and neuter program, with the administration and outreach costs, as well as the veterinary costs is the largest program expenditure for PAW Fund. The subsidy truly enables us to focus on the tremendous impacts and outcomes we see and takes just a bit of pressure off.” -Jill Posener, PAW Fund Executive Director “We are grateful that the Animal Benefit Fund has provided significant resources toward our efforts.” -Pawsitively S.A.F.E. Executive Director, Julie Rasmussen Thank You To Our Donors! The Animal Benefit Fund has allowed CCAS to put ideas into action, the results of which were highlighted in this presentation. To our donors, we say, “Thank You” for believing in us and for providing us the tools necessary to impact and touch even more lives. CCAS is grateful for each and every contribution, funding that has allowed us to save and transform lives in ways we could have never imagined. We simply could not do this without you! Questions RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT report from the Animal Services Director on the Animal Benefit Fund;1. CONSIDER recommendations of the Animal Services Director and PROVIDE direction to staff regarding next steps: 2. authorize the Animal Services Director to accept any monetary donation, gift, bequest, or devise made to or in favor of the Contra Costa County Animal Services Department as allowed under Government Code section 25355 (NOTE: County policy requires Department Heads to notify the CAO regarding donations exceeding $1,000 and obtain Board of Supervisors approval for donations exceeding $10,000); approve the continued use of the Animal Benefit Fund; establish new programs that receive assistance under that Fund; authorize the Animal Services Director to solicit donations for the benefit of shelter animals; direct the Animal Services Director to file a report with the Board of Supervisors every quarter that describes the source and value of each gift; and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 04/19/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Ward (925) 335-8370 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: April 19, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Animal Services Director, IOC Staff, CAO, Auditor-Controller, County Finance Director C.48 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:April 19, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:ANIMAL BENEFIT FUND ARCHIVED DOCUMENT direct the Animal Services Director to submit a report annually to the Internal Operations Committee regarding the impact of the Animal Benefit fund on our community animals and families. ARCHIVED DOCUMENT RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) > FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. The Animal Benefit Fund is the repository for community donations that help to fund unmet needs of animals impounded at County shelters. The Animal Services Department anticipates that approximately $150,000 will be received annually in donations. This estimate is based on the amount of donations received by the animal shelter over the last 3 years. BACKGROUND: On April 21, 2015, the Board of Supervisors received several comments regarding the Animal Benefit Fund from members of the public during fiscal year 2015/16 budget hearings. As part of budget deliberations, the Board directed staff to include a review of the Animal Benefit Fund to a Board Standing Committee for further review. On May 12, 2015, the Board of Supervisors adopted the fiscal year 2015/16 budget. Included in the Board’s action was the formal referral of this issue to the Internal Operations Committee. On September 14, 2015, the CAO reported to the IOC on the history of the Animal Benefit Fund (report attached hereto for reference). With the retirement of former Animal Services Director Glenn Howell, further study on this referral was suspended until the new department director, Beth Ward, could review the history and provide input and advice to the Committee. Following is the report and recommendations presented Ms. Ward to the Internal Operations Committee, and which the IOC approved, on March 28, 2016. I. BACKGROUND ON THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER The Contra Costa County Animal Shelter (CCCAS) receives approximately 12,000 live domestic and livestock animals annually. CCCAS’ budget is designed to cover the basic needs of incoming stray, abandoned, and homeless animals and our County licensing and field services departments. The basic needs include food, prophylactic medical care (spay/neutering), antibiotics and general veterinary supplies, emergency veterinary treatment, sterilization, microchips, and collars/travel boxes for animals. As an open-door agency, the CCCAS accepts animals suffering from medical or behavioral conditions that while treatable, may initially disqualify the animal from placement into a new home. CCCAS’ operating budget is currently not designed to fund extended medical rehabilitation for injured/ill animals, behavior management, foster care supplies for orphaned animals, supplies designed to enhance animal enrichment in the shelter environment, or marketing and outreach efforts aimed at increasing adoptions. II. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ANIMAL BENEFIT FUND In 1988, the CCCAS created the Animal Benefit Fund. The original purpose of the Animal Benefit Fund was to allow the Animal Services Department to receive donations from individuals, animal welfare organizations and businesses, to support animal health and welfare projects that are not funded by departmental or general County revenue. Since the creation of the Animal Benefit Fund, monetary contributions and donations for services and supplies for animal welfare have provided for unfunded needs of the animals impounded in CCCAS. These donations have come in the form of grants or “soft ask” gifts over the counter or from our website. III. PROPOSAL TO EXPAND THE 1988 AUTHORIZATION ARCHIVED DOCUMENT In order to increase our ability to create more funding opportunities and clarity around how funds will be used, the CCCAS is requesting that the Board increase the authority of the Animal Services Director to accept any monetary donation, gift, bequest, or devise made to or in favor of the Contra Costa County Animal Services Department as allowed under Government Code section 25355, approve the continued use of the Animal Benefit Fund, establish new programs that receive assistance under that Fund, authorize the Animal Services Director to solicit donations for the benefit of shelter animals, and require the Animal Services Director to provide an annual report to the Internal Operations Committee. The following are the program descriptions: Animal Benefit Fund: Animals have a variety of needs, and CCCAS does not always have the funds to address those needs. The Animal Benefit Fund may be used for such needs as medical treatment of a sick/injured dog, orthopedic repair for a damaged limb, veterinary diagnostic tests, kennel enrichment in the form of toys and beds, upgraded dog training supplies for volunteers such as training collars/harnesses, nutritional supplies for orphaned puppies and kittens, print or radio advertising to promote adoptions, and spay/neuter efforts. In addition to monetary donations to the Animal Benefit Fund, wish lists, in-kind gifts, Amazon Smile gifts, and gift cards to pet stores, home improvement stores, and other big box stores can also help us with these needs. The Animal Benefit Fund would support the following seven new programs: (1) Panda’s Gift Program: This program is for emergency vet care and goes to help animals like Panda, a dog who was brought to us in distress, in labor with a deceased puppy stuck inside, an old injury to her left eye and in overall poor condition. Our medical team acted quickly, rushing her into surgery, removed the puppy from the birth canal, performed an Ovariohysterectomy, and did a third eyelid flap to protect her injured eye. Panda quickly recovered from her surgery and acted like a new pup, snuggling with her foster family and learning what it felt like to be safe and loved. A family met and fell in love with Panda and took her home to join their household. Without donations to this fund, happy endings like Panda’s would not be possible. (2) Education Program: This program is to help pet owners resolve behavioral problems that might cause them to give up their pet, to help shelter animals with behavioral issues that might keep them from being easily adopted, and to create education programs for school age children. CCCAS will be creating a program where local trainers will work with pet owners, shelter dogs, volunteers and foster homes on reducing various behavioral problems, resulting in fewer surrenders and more successful adoptions. This program can also help to support humane education in our communities. (3) Shelter Intervention Program: Often times families get into a crisis situation where they turn to surrendering their pet to a shelter. Our intervention program would help to provide resources to keep animals in their homes. Examples of intervention tools: spay/neuter, behavior/training assistance, and grooming. (4) Transfer Partner Assistance Program: This program would provide support to our smaller transfer partners, who help save the lives of animals with medical concerns or basic Spay/Neuter support for animals pulled from CCASD. (5) Spay and Neuter Program: This program would make spay and neuter more affordable and accessible in our County by establishing a donation subsidized voucher program to provide free or low cost spay/neuter surgeries in collaboration with local veterinarians. ARCHIVED DOCUMENT (6) Pets for Seniors Program: A pet is sometimes the only companion our community’s elders have, and the health and psychological benefits of having a pet are well-documented. This program pays a portion of the adoption fee for qualifying seniors, allowing them to use the money they saved to help pay for the initial items necessary for keeping a pet. This program may also be used to help seniors on limited incomes to keep animals in their lives when they may have had to give up their furry companion due to lack of money for basic daily needs or medical concerns. (7) Discounted Adoption Program: Sometimes, we are critically full of pets waiting for new homes. Rather than euthanize healthy adoptable or treatable animals, CCCAS discounts the adoption of pets to give people even more of an incentive to adopt. CCCAS also participates in national adoption events, promoting the placement of shelter animals. We are only able to offer reduced-fee adoptions when we have donated funding available. IV. OTHER PROPOSALS COVERED IN THE EXPANDED AUTHORIZATION In addition to approving the formation of the new programs described above, the expanded authorization would delegate to the Animal Services Director the power to accept any gift, bequest, or devise made for the benefit of animals in the shelter through programs such as a car donation and planned giving programs pursuant to Government Code section 25355. In keeping with this code section, the Director will file a report with the Board every quarter that describes the source and value of each gift. An annual report will also be provided that shares the impact of the Animal Benefit fund on our community animals and families. As is required by statute, any gifted funds or assets will be used for those purposes as are prescribed in the terms of the gift, bequest, or devise. The monies in these funds are not intended to replace General Funds, rather they are intended to supplement and enhance our care for animals and support of the public. CCCAS is also requesting that the Director be authorized to solicit monetary contributions through methods such as request forms included in dog license mailing, website information, and adopters and owners surrendering pets being given the opportunity to assist other shelter animals by contributing at the time of their transaction. Donations will be tax-deductible and acknowledged in writing to the donor. Gifts by donors may be designated directly to a specific gift fund or program. Gifts received with no instruction as to the use for a specific area or program or funds donated for “general animal welfare” will be considered as part of the general Animal Benefit Fund. Monies raised through in-house donations, and/or general fund raising activities shall be considered undesignated gift funds. The Director will utilize these funds in a manner that is consistent with the specific purpose for which they were donated. It is also important to recognize that these are donated funds and as such the use of the funds to pay businesses, organizations and fund voucher programs for various services to support the CCCASD programs would not be considered “gifts of County funds”. Each year, the Director will recommend expenditures from the Animal Benefit Fund through the budgetary process. Grants and designated funds shall be expended according to the grant or designated gift. Designated balances of $50 or less will be rolled back into the undesignated gift funds. Should the CCCAS wish to expend more than $25,000 per purchase order, CCCAS must submit a request in writing for approval by the Board of Supervisors. ARCHIVED DOCUMENT The CCCAS anticipates that approximately $150,000 will be received annually in donations. This estimate is based on the amount of donations received by the animal shelter over the last 3 years. ATTACHMENTS Public Comment Received at the 3/28/16 IOC Meeting 9/14/15 Archived Report to IOC on the Animal Benefit Fund ARCHIVED DOCUMENT RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/416 approving and authorizing the Auditor-Controller, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, to make payments to former sworn Office of the Sheriff employees for reimbursement of their time and travel expenditures related to subpoenaed Court appearances for cases worked while employed at the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated annual cost should not exceed $10,000. (100% Sheriff's Budget Funded) BACKGROUND: The legal system is a lengthy process and there are some instances when a sworn Office of the Sheriff employee, who was originally involved in the criminal case, no longer works for the department when the criminal case is scheduled for the court trial. To assist with the successful prosecution of the case, the Office of the Sheriff is requesting the ability to pay a former sworn employee for a court appearance by establishing an internal policy wherein a procedure is created to compensate former employees for their APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 9256550005 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 92 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Office of the Sheriff Former Employee Pay for Court Subpoena Appearance BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) time and travel expenditures related to their appearance in court. The Office of the Sheriff's parameters for authorizing and approving the reimbursement would include: *Former employee has proof of Subpoena; *Employee left by resignation, retirement or other means; *Former employee would receive hourly compensation at the former pay rate step prior to separation; *Former employee would be compensated for a minimum of three (3) hours of straight time; Expense reimbursement for travel, lodging, and daily per diem rates will be in compliance with the Contra Costa County Administrative Bulletin No.111.9 "Travel." Number of lodging days and per diem reimbursement approval will be in conjunction with the length of court testimony time required by the Presiding Judge of the court trail. All estimated travel and per diem expenses subject to reimbursement must be approved by the Office of the Sheriff prior to incurring expenditures. The Office of the Sheriff has final authority for approving actual expenditure reimbursements and will submit payment demand to the Auditor-Controller's Office for payment processing. Maximum reimbursement shall not exceed $5,000 per individual per hearing appearance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Former employees of the Office of the Sheriff will not be compensated for their time and reimbursed for travel and per diem expenditures incurred due to a subpoena to appear in court. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Subpoena may be related to a case involving a minor within Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/416 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to close all branches of the County Library according to the holiday and training schedule outlined in the attached "2023 Library Closures" list. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Every year in the Fall, the County Administrator's Office sends out a list to all department heads of the holidays that will be observed during the following calendar year. Using this information, an annual Library Closures list is created and submitted (attached) to the Board of Supervisors for approval. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The libraries will remain open and staff will not be able to enjoy the same list of holidays that other county employees do. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Walt Beveridge 925-608-7730 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 93 To:Board of Supervisors From:Alison McKee, County Librarian Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Library Closure List for 2023 ATTACHMENTS 2023 Library Closures Closures for January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023: Monday, January 2, 2023 New Year's Day (Observed) All libraries closed (holiday) Monday, January 16, 2023 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day All libraries closed (holiday) Monday, February 20, 2023 Presidents’ Day All libraries closed (holiday) Wednesday, March 29, 2023 All Staff Training Day All libraries closed Monday, May 29, 2023 Memorial Day All libraries closed (holiday) Monday, June 19, 2023 Juneteenth All libraries closed (holiday) Tuesday, July 4, 2023 Independence Day All libraries closed (holiday) Monday, September 4, 2023 Labor Day All libraries closed (holiday) Friday, November 10, 2023 Veteran’s Day (Observed) All libraries closed (holiday) Saturday, November 11, 2023 Veteran’s Day All libraries closed (holiday) Wednesday, November 22, 2023 (day before Thanksgiving) All libraries close at 6:00 p.m. Thursday, November 23, 2023 Thanksgiving Day All libraries closed (holiday) Monday, December 25, 2023 Christmas Eve (observed) All libraries closed (holiday) Tuesday, December 26, 2023 Christmas Day (Observed) All libraries closed (holiday) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, medical staff advancement, voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive Committee, at their October 17, 2022 meeting, and by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval for each Medical Staff member be placed in his or her Credentials File. The above recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by the Credentials Committee and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers' medical staff would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Soleimanieh, 925-370-5182 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 94 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – October 17, 2022 ATTACHMENTS October List RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/394 to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 providing for wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the period of September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: The County share of the negotiated contract increases will be added to the FY 2022/23 IHSS Maintenance of Effort (MOE). The salary increase of $0.43 in addition to the existing $1.00 supplement is expected to begin approximately February 1, 2023. The estimated general fund cost in FY 2022/23 is $518,000, FY 2023/24 is $3.17 million, FY 2024/25 is $4.73 million, FY 2025/26 is $5.77 million, and Quarter One (Q1) of FY 2026/27 is $1.5 million. The total fiscal impact on net county cost over the course of the MOU is $15.7 million. BACKGROUND: The Public Authority began bargaining with SEIU, Local 2015 on August 30, 2022. A tentative agreement was reached on October 28, 2022. The resulting Memorandum of Understanding is attached and was ratified by SEIU Local 2015 on November 15, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Tia Wilborn (925) 655-2073 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 95 To:In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2022/394 Memorandum of Understanding between IHSS Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) In summary, the significant changes are: Duration of Agreement - Section 19 September 1, 2022 - August 31, 2026 Wages - Section 7 Effective as soon as practicable upon ratification by the Union, approval by the Board of Supervisors sitting as the Governing Body of the Public Authority and State approval, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional forty-three cents ($0.43) for a total supplement of one dollar and forty-three cents ($1.43). Effective September 1, 2023, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional one dollar ($1.00) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of two dollars and forty-three cents ($2.43) per hour. Effective September 1, 2024, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional forty cents ($0.40) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of two dollars and eighty-three cents ($2.83) per hour. Effective May 1, 2025, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional thirty cents ($0.30) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of three dollars and thirteen cents ($3.13) per hour. No Discrimination – Section 4 Adds ancestry and gender expression Health/Dental Plan – Section 14 Deletes obsolete language CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this MOU will result in the providers continuing to work out of contract and not benefiting from the negotiated wage increases. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/394 IHSS and SEIU 2015 MOU (2022-2026) MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/394 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/394 In the Matter of Approving the Memorandum of Understanding between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting solely in its capacity as governing board of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority RESOLVES THAT: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 providing for wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the period of September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2026 is ADOPTED. A copy of the MOU is attached. Contact: Tia Wilborn (925) 655-2073 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AUTHORITY AND SEIU LOCAL 2015 SEPTEMBER 1, 2022 – AUGUST 31, 2026 i SEIU LOCAL 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS ................................................................... 2 SECTION 2 UNION RECOGNITION .................................................... 2 SECTION 3 MUTUAL RESPECT ......................................................... 2 SECTION 4 NO DISCRIMINATION ...................................................... 2 SECTION 5 PAYROLL ......................................................................... 3 SECTION 6 UNION RIGHTS 6.1 Information ........................................................................ 3 6.2 Bulletin Boards .................................................................. 3 6.3 Dues Deduction ................................................................ 4 6.4 Payroll Deductions and Payover ....................................... 4 SECTION 7 WAGES 7.1 Base Wages ...................................................................... 4 7.2 Wage Contingency ............................................................ 5 7.3 Additional Funding ............................................................ 5 SECTION 8 CONSUMER RIGHTS 8.1 Consumer as Employer ..................................................... 5 8.2 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy ......................................... 5 SECTION 9 REGISTRY ........................................................................ 6 SECTION 10 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 10.1 Definition and Procedural Steps ........................................ 6 10.2 Scope of Arbitration Decisions .......................................... 7 10.3 Time Limits ........................................................................ 7 10.4 Union Notification .............................................................. 7 SECTION 11 ORIENTATION AND TRAINING ...................................... 8 SECTION 12 HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.1 Health and Safety Committee ........................................... 8 12.2 Safe and Healthy Working Environment ........................... 8 12.3 Personal Protective Equipment ......................................... 8 SECTION 13 PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION .................................. 9 ii SECTION 14 HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN ............................................... 10 SECTION 15 OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS 15.1 Official Representatives .................................................. 11 15.2 Stewards ......................................................................... 12 SECTION 16 NO STRIKE/NO LOCKOUT ........................................... 12 SECTION 17 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE .......................... 12 SECTION 18 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT AND SEPARABILITY OF PROVISIONS 18.1 Scope of Agreement ....................................................... 12 18.2 Separability of Provisions ................................................ 12 SECTION 19 TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................................ 12 SEIU LOCAL 2015 1 of 12 2022-2026 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AUTHORITY AND SEIU, LOCAL 2015 This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into pursuant to the authority contained in Division 34 of Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165 and Cont ra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14 and has been jointly prepared by the parties. The Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS Public Authority) is the representative in authority-provider relations matters as provided in Board of Supervisors' Resolution 81/1165 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98 - 14. The parties have met and conferred in good fait h regarding wages and other terms and conditions of employment as defined in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 12301.6 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14 for the providers in the unit in which the Union is the recognized representative, have f reely exchanged information, opinions and proposals and have endeavored to reach agreement on all matters relating to the authority-provider relations covering such providers. This MOU shall be presented to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, a s the governing board of the IHSS Public Authority, as the joint recommendations of the undersigned for salary and other adjustments for the term set forth herein. SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS SEIU LOCAL 2015 2 of 12 2022-2026 SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS Days – Calendar days unless otherwise specified. Union – SEIU, Local 2015 Public Authority – Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Provider – An individual providing In-Home Supportive Services and/or Waiver Personal Care Services (WPCS) to a Consumer. The Individual may provide IHSS hours and/or WPCS hours. Consumer – IHSS Consumer SECTION 2 - UNION RECOGNITION SEIU Local 2015 (Union) is the formally recognized employee organization for the representation unit listed below, and has been certified as such pursuant to Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98 -14. In-Home Supportive Services Provider Unit – Effective July 1, 2019, the bargaining unit includes Providers employed in the Waiver Personal Care Services (WPCS) program. SECTION 3 - MUTUAL RESPECT The Public Authority and the Union agree that all workers and administrators involved in the IHSS program regardless of position, profession, or rank, will treat each other with courtesy, dignity and respect. The foregoing shall also apply in providing services to the public, specifically including Consumers. The Public Authority and the Union will meet, in a timely manner, from time to time, at the request of either party, to discuss issues regarding the application of this section. SECTION 4 - NO DISCRIMINATION There shall be no discrimination because of sex, race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, gender expression, genetic information or union activities against any Provider by the Public Authority or by anyone employed by the Public Authority; and to the extent prohibited by applicable State and Federal law there shall be no discrimination because of age. There shall be no discrimination against any disabled person seeking to be listed on the IHSS registry solely because of such disability unless that disability prevents the person SECTION 5 - PAYROLL SEIU LOCAL 2015 3 of 12 2022-2026 from performing the essential functions established for the position or from carrying out the duties of the position safely. The parties will encourage Consumers to refrain from discrimination as described in this Article. SECTION 5 - PAYROLL To promote a timely and accurate payroll system, the Public Authority and the Union shall work together to identify causes and solutions to problems resulting in late, lost or inaccurate paychecks and similar issues. When the causes of problems are outside the Public Authority’s direct control, the Public Authority and Union shall work cooperatively to create solutions by bringing the problems to the attention of the responsible agencies (this may include the State’s payroll department, for example). The Public Authority shall provide all home care workers with direct clerical and local access phone numbers at the Public Authority to call for timely answers to payroll questions and resolutions to problems. The Public Authority shall address resolutions to payroll problems in a timely manner. The Public Authority and the Union shall share information on the causes and potential solutions for payroll issues in good faith and in a spirit of cooperative problem solving. SECTION 6 - UNION RIGHTS 6.1 Information. The State provides, on a monthly basis, to the Union a list of all current providers including name, address, telephone number, social security number and hours worked. The Union shall defend, indemnify, save, protect and hold harmless Contra Costa County and the Public Authority and their respective boards, directors, officers and employees from any and all claims, costs and liabilities for any damages and/or injury arising from disclosure to the Union of Provider names, social security numbers, addresses and phone numbers. Th e County’s and/or the Public Authority’s right to be defended, indemnified, saved, protected and held harmless hereunder shall be unaffected by the concurrent negligence of the County, the Public Authority or any other person. 6.2 Bulletin Boards. The Public Authority will provide a bulletin board in its office for use by the Union provided the communications displayed have to do with offi cial organization business including, but not limited to, times and places of meetings and further provided that the employee organization appropriately posts and removes the information. The Executive Director reserves the right to remove objectionable materials only after notification to and discussion with the Union. SECTION 7- WAGES SEIU LOCAL 2015 4 of 12 2022-2026 6.3 Dues Deduction. Pursuant to Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165, only a majority representative may have dues deduction and as such the Union has the exclusive privilege of dues deduction for all employees in its unit. 6.4 Payroll Deductions and Payover. The Union shall instruct the State to commence and continue a monthly payroll deduction of Union dues from the regular pay warrants of Providers authorizing such deduction. The Union shall instruct the State of the dollar amount to deduct for Union dues or other authorized Union deductions, including voluntary COPE contributions, specifying the purpose(s) of the deduction. The Provider’s earnings must be sufficient after other legal and required deductions are made to cover the amount of the dues or other deductions that have been approved b y the Provider. When a Provider is in a non-pay status for an entire pay period, no withholding will be made to cover the pay period from future earnings. In the case of a Provider who is in a non-pay status during only part of the pay period, and the sa lary is not sufficient to cover the full withholding, no deduction shall be made. In this connection, all other legal and required deductions (including health care deductions) have priority over Union dues or other authorized Union deductions. SECTION 7- WAGES 7.1 Base Wages. The Base Wage for Providers shall be the State or Federal minimum wage, whichever is highest. The Wage Supplement approved by the Governing Body of the Public Authority on June 23, 2020 was one dollar ($1.00) per hour in addition to the Base Wage. 1. Effective as soon as practicable upon ratification by the Union, approval by the Board of Supervisors sitting as the Governing Body of the Public Authority and State approval, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional forty-three cents ($0.43) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of one dollar and forty-three cents ($1.43) per hour. The Wage Supplement will be added to the County’s Maintenance of Effort (“MOE”) and will not be compounded for subsequent increases not locally negotiated. 2. Effective September 1, 2023, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional one dollar ($1.00) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of two dollars and forty-three cents ($2.43) per hour. The Wage Supplement will be added to t he County’s MOE and will not be compounded for subsequent increases not locally negotiated. 3. Effective September 1, 2024, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional forty cents ($0.40) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of two dollars and eighty-three cents ($2.83) per hour. The Wage Supplement will be added to the County’s MOE and will not be compounded for subsequent increases not locally negotiated. 4. Effective May 1, 2025, the Wage Supplement shall be increased by an additional thirty cents ($0.30) per hour for a total Wage Supplement of three dollars and thirteen SECTION 8 - CONSUMER RIGHTS SEIU LOCAL 2015 5 of 12 2022-2026 cents ($3.13) per hour. The Wage Supplement will be added to the County’s MOE and will not be compounded for subsequent increases not locally negotiated. The Public Authority will submit the appropriate request to the State to implement the rate which includes the Base Wage and the Wage Supplement within five (5) business days following Union ratification and the Public Authority adoption of this agreement, and timely for any subsequent change in the Base Wage or Wage Supplement. 7.2 Wage Contingency. If, during the term of this Agreement, either state or federal participation levels are reduced or, either the state or federal sharing formula is modified in any manner that would result in an increased cost to the County and/or the Public Authority, wages may be reduced by an amount necessary to keep the total cost to the County and/or the Public Authority the same as such cost existed on the day prior to the effective date of such reduction or modification. The Public Authority shall provide to the Union a detailed written description of any proposed adjustments to be made pursuant to Section 7, Wages, thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such adjustmen ts. Upon receipt of a written request from the Union to do so, the Public Authority will meet and confer to discuss the impact of the above-described loss of funding, but in no case shall the Public Aut hority be required to increase its contribution toward wages. 7.3 Additional Funding. It is understood that the Union actively and aggressively fights and wins funding for IHSS. Should any extra funding be secured for the IHSS Program, including any change to the State’s position regarding funding payments to the Pension, the Union and the Public Authority will meet within thirty (30) days of its approval to discuss the funding appropriations. SECTION 8 - CONSUMER RIGHTS 8.1 Consumer as Employer. Under State Law and County Ordinance estab lishing the Public Authority, Consumers have the sole and undisputed right to: 1) hire Providers of their choice; 2) remove Providers from their service at will; 3) determine in advance and under all circumstances who can and cannot enter their home; and 4) supervise the work of Providers providing services to them. 8.2 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy. Union representatives and Providers shall maintain strict standards of confidentiality regarding Consumers and shall not disclose personal information obtained, from whatever source, pertaining to Consumers, unless disclosure is compelled by legal process or otherwise authorized by law. SECTION 9 - REGISTRY SEIU LOCAL 2015 6 of 12 2022-2026 SECTION 9 - REGISTRY In accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 12301.6 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14, the Public Authority shall operate a registry for the purpose of assisting Consumers in finding Providers. The parties agree to meet and confer regarding registry matters which impact Provider wages, hours and working conditions including, but not limited to, possible respite and emergency referrals. SECTION 10 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 10.1 Definition and Procedural Steps. A grievance is any dispute which involves the interpretation or application of any provision of this MOU excluding, however, those provisions of this MOU which specifically provide that the decision of any Public Authority official or Consumer shall be final, the interpretation or application of those provisions not being subject to the grievan ce procedure. The Union may represent the grievant at any stage of the process. Grievances must be filed within thirty (30) days of the incident or occurrence about which the grievant claims to have a grievance and shall be processed in the following manner: Step 1. Any Provider who believes that a provision of this MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied to his or her detriment shall discuss the complaint with the Public Authority’s Executive Director or such representative as the Director may designate. Step 2. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 1 above, the grievant, or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, may submit the grievance in writing within fifteen (15) days to the Public Authority Director or his/her designated labor relations representative. The grievance shall state which provision of the MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied, how misapplication or misinterpretation has affected the grievant to the grievant's detriment, and the redress he or she seeks. The Pub lic Authority Director or his designee shall have twenty (20) days in which to respond to the grievance in writing. If the grievant requests a meeting with the IHSS Public Authority Director or his/her designee at this step, such a meeting will be held. Step 3. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 2 a bove, either party may request in writing within twenty (20) days that the matter be referred to non-binding confidential mediation. Mediation will only occur upon the parties’ mutual agreeme nt. The parties will mutually select a mediator, or if agreement cannot be reached, the parties may request that a mediator be assigned by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service. Anything discussed during the mediation will remain confidential and cannot be used or referenced during any subsequent proceedings (i.e . arbitration, a different grievance, etc.). SECTION 10 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE SEIU LOCAL 2015 7 of 12 2022-2026 Step 4. No grievance may be processed under this Section, which has not first been filed and investigated in accordance with Step 1 and 2 above an d filed within fifteen (15) days of the written response of the Public Authority Director or the completion of mediation. If the parties are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory acco rd on any grievance which arises and is presented during the term of this MOU, either the grievant, or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, or the Public Authority may require that the grievance be referred to an impartial arbitrator who shall be designated by mutual agreement between the grievant, or the Union of the grievant’s behalf, and the Public Authority Director. Within twenty-five (25) days of the request for arbitration, the parties shall mutually select an arbitrator who shall render a decision w ithin forty-five (45) days from the date of final submission of the grievance including receipt of the court repor- ter's transcript and post hearing briefs, if any. The fees and expenses of the arbitrator and of the Court Reporter shall be shared equally by the grievant or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, and the Public Authority. Each party, however, shall bear the costs of its own presentation, including preparation and post-hearing briefs, if any. 10.2 Scope of Arbitration Decisions. A. Decisions of arbitrators on matters properly before them shall be final and binding on the parties hereto, to the extent permitted by law. B. No arbitrator shall entertain, hear, decide or make recommendations on any dispute unless such dispute involves a position in a unit represented by the Union which has been certified as the recognized employee organization for such unit and such dispute falls within the definition of a grievance as set forth in Subsection 1 above. C. Proposals to add to or change this MOU or to change written agreements supplementary hereto shall not be arbitrable and no proposal to modify, amend, or terminate this MOU, nor any matter or subject arising out of or in connection with such proposals, may be referred to arbitration under this Section. No arbitrator shall have the power to amend or modify this MOU or written agreements supplementary hereto or to establish any new terms or conditions of employment. D. No change in this MOU or interpretations thereof (except interpretations resulting from arbitration proceedings hereunder) will be recognized unless agreed to by the Public Authority and the Union. 10.3 Time Limits. The time limits specified above may be waived by mutual agreement of the parties to the grievance. If the Public Authority fails to meet the time limits specified in Steps 1 through 3 above, the grievance will automatically move to the next step. If a grievant fails to meet the time limits specified in Steps 1 through 5 above, the grievance will be deemed to have been sett led and withdrawn. 10.4 Union Notification. An official, with whom a formal grievance is filed by a grievant who is included in a unit represented by the Union, but is not represented by the Union in the grievance, shall give the Union a copy of the formal presentation. SECTION 11 - ORIENTATION AND TRAINING SEIU LOCAL 2015 8 of 12 2022-2026 SECTION 11 - ORIENTATION AND TRAINING The Public Authority shall seek and give full consideration to the Union’s in put for the purpose of developing and implementing training programs for Providers. Training materials and the curriculum will be developed in conjunction with the Advisory Committee, giving full consideration to the Union’s input. The Public Authority shall provide reasonable notice to the Union of group orientations of Providers and Provider training classes. The Public Authority shall provide an opportunity for Union representatives to make presentations at such gatherings. The Public Authority will provide the Union with an annual calendar of New Provider Orientations, indicating the location and designated language for the orientation. Whenever feasible, the Public Authority will give no less than one week’s notice of any changes to orientations. The Union will be given a maximum of thirty (30) minutes at or about the beginning of each orientation to talk to new Providers about the Union. Upon request and with proper notice, the Union may be allowed to use available audio-visual equipment. The Public Authority will provide the Union with a copy of the attendance list including names and telephone numbers after each ne w Provider orientation. The Public Authority shall have the sole discretion regarding the scheduling of group orientations of Providers and Provider training classes. In the event that the Union is unable to attend a Provider orientation, the Public Authority shall inform Providers that they are represented by the Union and will distribute Union authorization forms and related printed Union information provided by the Union, at orientations of Providers and at Provider training classes. SECTION 12 - HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.1 Health and Safety Committee. The Public Authority staff will meet with Advisory Committee members, social workers, Public Health staff, the Union and other interested parties to explore/study this issue; and, if needed, develop a policy and procedure to address the issue. 12.2 Safe and Healthy Working Environment. Public Authority recognizes the importance of providing a safe and healthy working environment for Providers. No Provider shall be expected to work in any situation which could threaten his/her health and safety. The Provider shall report any unsafe or hazardous conditions to the Public Authority immediately. In an effort to assist, the Public Authority will furnish the Provider with contact information (e.g., resource list) that may be helpful in resolving health and safety concerns. The Public Authority will provide information to Providers regarding Workers’ Compensation, Unemployment and State Disability Insurance (SDI). 12.3 Personal Protective Equipment. Effective July 1, 2020, and in each fiscal year thereafter, the Public Authority will spend up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) each SECTION 13 – PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION SEIU LOCAL 2015 9 of 12 2022-2026 year for the purpose of purchasing and stocking protective supplies for Providers. Such supplies will include protective gloves, masks and antibacterial soap and/or wipes. The Public Authority shall work with the Union in partnership to determine the distribution of the equipment to the Providers. SECTION 13 – PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION A. Coverage: The Public Authority agrees to make contributions on behalf of eligible IHSS providers as defined and covered by this MOU to the Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund, hereinafter referred to as the “Fund” in the amounts specified in Section C below. B. Term: The Public Authority agrees to become and remain a particip ating Employer in the Fund beginning on July 1, 2001 through the end of the term of this MOU, including any extension thereof, provided that the Public Authority’s contributions are eligible for Federal matching funds. C. Contributions: 1. The Public Authority will contribute to the Fund in the amount of $0.15 for each hour worked by eligible IHSS providers covered by this MOU. 2. Contributions required by this provision shall be paid to the Fund on or before the last day of the month following the period for which contributions are due, or before such other date as the Trustees may hereafter determine. 3. Contributions shall be transmitted together with a remittance report containing such information, in such manner, and on such form as may be required by the Trustees of the Fund or their designee. 4. Contributions for a Provider shall begin once a Provider has worked one thousand (1,000) hours after July 1, 2001. Contributions shall be made for such Provider irrespective of the number of hours worked, in subsequent years. Until contributions are required to be made on behalf of a Provider pursuant to the terms of this provision, the Provider shall not be deemed to be a covered Provider in covered employment within the meaning of the SEIU National Industry Pension Plan. 5. In the event that the Fund imposes any surcharges upon the P ublic Authority, the Public Authority will contribute the surcharge amount to the Fund. 6. Both parties acknowledge that there may be other ways to provide a retirement benefit for the providers and agree to work cooperatively over SECTION 14 - HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN SEIU LOCAL 2015 10 of 12 2022-2026 the course of this agreement to identify other options that are both economically sound and fulfill the purpose of crea ting an appropriate retirement benefit. D. Trust Agreement: The Public Authority hereby agrees to be bound by the provisions of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust establishing the Fund, as it may, from time to time, be amended, and by all resolution s and rules adopted by the Trustees pursuant to the powers delegated to them by that Agreement, including collection policies, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. The Public Authority hereby designates the Employer members of the Fund’s Board of Trustees, or their duly selected successor(s), as its representatives on the Board. E. Cooperation: The Public Authority and Union agree to cooperate with the Trustees of the Fund in distributing Plan booklets, literature and other documents supplied by the Fund Administrator and in obtaining and providing such census and other data as may be required by the Fund’s Administrator or Trustees to enable them to comply with the applicable provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). In any case, there shall be no mailing or other costs incurred by the Public Authority. The parties acknowledge that the provisions of this Section and the participation of the Providers covered by it are subject to approval by the Trustees of the Fund and that the Trustees reserve the right to terminate, at their sole and unreviewable discretion, the participation of the Providers covered by this MOU and to establish the level(s) of benefits to be provided. Termination may be directed by the Trustees for reasons including, but not limited to, failure of the Public Authority to timely pay contributions and expiration of the MOU. In the event the Trust ceases or otherwise terminates covera ge of Providers, the Public Authority shall have no other pension obligation to the Providers. The parties further acknowledge that the Trustees’ acceptance for participation in the Fund of the Providers covered by the MOU is limited only to the categorie s of employment covered by the MOU at the time application for acceptance occurs and the admission of other categories for employment to participate in the Fund will require specific acceptance by the Trustees. SECTION 14 - HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN The following benefit programs shall be offered to Providers (Providers): A. Program. The Public Authority shall offer CCHP Plan A-2 single coverage including single dental coverage to eligible Providers. SECTION 15 - OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS SEIU LOCAL 2015 11 of 12 2022-2026 B. The Authority will pay ninety-five percent (95%) of the CCHP Plan A-2 monthly premium for each eligible Provider who is enrolled in the CCHP Plan A-2. Each enrolled Provider will pay five percent (5%) of the monthly plan premium. Should CCHP Plan A-2 premiums increase over the course of this agreement the Public Authority shall provide the Union a written notice of the amount of such premium increase at least sixty (60) days before the premium increase takes effect. C. Eligibility for CCHP Plan A-2 Coverage. 1. Initial eligibility shall be achieved when a Provider has two (2) consecutive months of service at an average of forty-five (45) paid hours per month. In order to maintain eligibility, a Provider shall continue to have at least forty- five (45) paid hours during each successive month. In the first (1st) month in which a Provider is paid for forty-five (45) or more hours, as verified by CMIPS data, the Public Authority will forward the Provider’s name to CCHP by the 15th of the following (2nd) month. CCHP will prepare and mail enrollment packets to the eligible providers by the 25th of that (2nd) month. A Provider must return the completed packet to CCHP accompanied by one (1) month’s premium contribution, by the last business day of the enrollment (3rd) month for health coverage to be effective on the first day of the f ifth (5th) month. 2. Any applications received by CCHP after the last business day of the enrollment (3rd) month will not be accepted, but an eligible Provider will be eligible to enroll during the next open enrollment period. D. Pre-Pay. Providers who have achieved eligibility under the terms of subsection 14.C “Eligibility” will pre-pay the provider’s portion of the premium cost so that the effective date of enrollment begins on the first day of the fifth (5th) month. Providers must continue to pre-pay their portion of the health insurance premium in order to continue benefits. E. Implementation. Open Enrollment periods shall be for thirty (30) days and be held in November of each year. F. Providers who are temporarily ineligible for any Public Authority CCHP Plan A-2 premium contribution may purchase, at their own cost coverage under CCHP Plan A-2, in accordance with the procedures set forth by the Contra Costa County Health Plan. SECTION 15 - OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS 15.1 Official Representatives. The Union shall notify the Public Authority of their Official Representatives and changes in such Representatives. The list shall be sent to SECTION 16 - NO STRIKE/NO LOCKOUT SEIU LOCAL 2015 12 of 12 2022-2026 the Labor Relations Unit and a copy will be sent to the Executive Director of the Public Authority. 15.2 Stewards. The Union shall notify the Public Authority of the names of their Stewards at the beginning of the contract year and update the names as changes occur. SECTION 16 - NO STRIKE/NO LOCKOUT During the term of this MOU, the Union, its members and representatives, agree not to engage in, authorize, sanction or support any strike, slowdown, stoppage of work, curtailment of production, or refusal to perform customary duties. The Public Authority agrees not to lockout members during the term of this MOU. SECTION 17 – LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE In order to encourage open communications, promote harmonious relations and resolve matters of mutual concern, the parties agree to create a labor-management committee. The committee will be governed by the following: 1. The committee will meet every month or as mutually agreed to by the parties. 2. The topics for such meetings m ay include, but are not limited to, mutual respect, payroll problems, paid time off (P.T.O.) and administrative issues associated therewith, health and safety issues and training and education. SECTION 18 - SCOPE OF AGREEMENT AND SEPARABILITY OF PROVISIONS 18.1 Scope of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this MOU fully and completely incorporates the understanding of the parties hereto and constitutes the sole and entire agreement between the parties in any and all matters subject to meet and confer. Neither party shall, during the term of this MOU demand any change herein, provided that nothing herein shall prohibit the parties from changing the terms of this MOU by mutual agreement. 18.2 Separability of Provisions. Should any section, clause or provision of this MOU be declared illegal, unlawful or unenforceable, by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of such section, clause or provision shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof, and such remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this MOU. SECTION 19 - TERM OF AGREEMENT September 1, 2022 and ending August 31, 2026. i SEIU LOCAL 2015 SUBJECT INDEX Additional Funding ............................................................................................. 5 Bulletin Boards ................................................................................................... 3 Base Wages ...................................................................................................... 4 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy .......................................................................... 5 Consumer as Employer ..................................................................................... 5 Consumer Rights ............................................................................................... 5 Definition and Procedural Steps (Grievance Procedure) ................................... 5 Definitions .......................................................................................................... 2 Dues Deduction ................................................................................................. 4 Grievance Procedure ......................................................................................... 6 Health and Safety .............................................................................................. 8 Health and Safety Committee ............................................................................ 8 Health/Dental Plan ........................................................................................... 10 Information (Union Rights) ................................................................................. 3 Labor-Management Committee ....................................................................... 12 Mutual Respect .................................................................................................. 2 No Discrimination ............................................................................................... 2 No Strike/No Lockout ....................................................................................... 12 Official Representatives ................................................................................... 11 Orientation and Training .................................................................................... 8 Payroll ................................................................................................................ 3 Payroll Deductions and Payover ........................................................................ 4 Pension Fund Participation ................................................................................ 9 Personal Protective Equipment .......................................................................... 8 Registry .............................................................................................................. 6 Safe and Healthy Working Environment ............................................................ 8 Scope of Agreement ........................................................................................ 12 Scope of Arbitration Decisions ........................................................................... 7 Separability of Provisions ................................................................................. 12 Stewards .......................................................................................................... 12 Term of Agreement .......................................................................................... 12 Time Limits (Grievance Procedure) ................................................................... 7 ii Union Notification ............................................................................................... 7 Union Recognition .............................................................................................. 2 Union Rights ...................................................................................................... 3 Wage Contingency ............................................................................................. 5 Wages ................................................................................................................ 4 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/395 approving the Side Letter between Contra Costa County and the Physicians’ and Dentists’ Organization of Contra Costa (PDOCC) modifying Section 32.4 - Duration of Agreement of the Memorandum of Understanding to extend the contract from October 31, 2022 through December 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This action has no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: This Side Letter extends the current Memorandum of Understanding from October 31, 2022 through December 31, 2022, to allow both parties to work together to negotiate an agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Members will continue working under an expired contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Tia Wilborn (925) 655-2073 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 96 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2022/395 - Physicians' and Dentists' Organization of Contra Costa Side Letter Extending Duration of Agreement AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/395 Side Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/395 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/395 In the Matter of: The Side Letter Agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the Physicians' and Dentists' Organization of Contra Costa, extending the duration of the current Memorandum of Understanding. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting solely in its capacity as the governing board of the County of Contra Costa RESOLVES THAT: Effective October 31, 2022, the attached Side Letter of Agreement dated October 31, 2022, between the County of Contra Costa and the Physicians' and Dentists' Organization of Contra Costa, be ADOPTED. Contact: Tia Wilborn (925) 655-2073 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT Duration of Agreement 1 of 1 This Side Letter is by and between the County of Contra Costa (“County”) and the Physicians’ and Dentists’ of Contra Costa (“PDOCC”) and is effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. This Side Letter modifies Section 32.4 Duration of Agreement of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (November 1, 2019 – October 31, 2022) between the County and PDOCC by extending the current MOU from October 31, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The parties acknowledge that proper written notice was provided to commence negotiations for a successor MOU as required by Section 32.4. The effect of this Side Letter is that all other terms and conditions of the MOU are extended accordingly for the new term of the MOU between the County and PDOCC (November 1, 2019 – December 31, 2022). Date: _______________ Contra Costa County: PDOCC: (Signature / Printed Name) (Signature / Printed Name) / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / DocuSign Envelope ID: 3B2B2D49-386A-4F99-8174-B183487D7289 Dr. David MacDonald Stacey Cue Tia Wilborn 10/31/2022 William "Bill" Corman RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the list of providers recommended by the Contra Costa Health Plan Medical Director and the Health Services Director on October 14 and 19, 2022, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) requires that evidence of Board of Supervisor approval must be contained within each Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) provider’s credentials file. Approval of this list of providers as recommended by the CCHP Medical Director will enable CCHP to comply with this requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, CCHP’s Providers would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with the NCQA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 97 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve New and Recredentialing Providers and Organizational Providers in Contra Costa Health Plan’s Community Provider Network ATTACHMENTS Oct 2022 Provider List Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by Medic al Director October 14 , 2022 CREDENTIALING PROVIDER S OCTOBER 2022 Name Specialty Al-Naqbi, Abeer, MD OB/GYN Alexander, Nicole, NP Mid-Level Family Medicine Barton, Cierra, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Berry, Sharon, PsyD Mental Health Services Borboa, Jessica, AMFT Mental Health Services Buxton, Lisa, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autism Provider Clark, Alana, NP Primary Care Internal Medicine De Freese, Marissa, MD Surgery - General Dillon, Alexander, MD Ophthalmology Kearney, Ellen, AMFT Mental Health Services Koren, Melissa, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autism Provi der Krosin, Michael, MD Surgery - Orthopaedic Lane, Brianna, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Mwashita, Emily, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Nwosu, Amanda, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Oleinick, Cydnie, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autism Provider Sanchez, Saul, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Urbano, Justin, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Wilson, Alexandra, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autism Provider CREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDER OCTOBER 2022 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Bakersfield Rehabilitation Hospital Long Term Acute Care Bakersfield RECREDENTIALING PROVIDER S OCTOBER 2022 Name Specialty Bader, Semon, MD Surgery – Orthopaedic / Sports Medicine Ballard, Phoebe, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Baril, Mario, OT Occupational Therapy Barocio, Azucena, PA Primary Care Family Medicine Berjis, Sahar, RD Dietitian Bozorgmehr, Jafar, MD Psychiatry Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by Medical Director October 14 and 19 2022 Page 2 of 2 RECREDENTIALING PROVIDER S OCTOBER 2022 Name Specialty Brandel, Joseph, MD Surgery – General Britt, Denise, DC Chiropractic Medicine Carter, Kristine, NP Mid-Level OB/GYN Chang, Gene-Yuan, MD Nephrology DeSouza, Neha, MD Hematology/Oncology Giessman, Dale, DC Chiropractic Medicine Guptill, Marie, LAc Acupuncture Holt, Scott, HAD Hearing Aid Dispensing Iota-Herbei, Claudia, MD Nephrology Jensen, Kirk, MD Surgery – Orthopaedic Jumper, James, MD Ophthalmology Kundu, Nirvana, MD Pain Medicine Law, Jason, MD Nephrology Ramachandra, Srinivas, MD Surgery – Vascular Sutton, Brenda, OD Optometry Vance, William, DPT Physical Therapy Volpe-Johnstone, Theresa, PhD Qualified Autism Provider RECREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDER S OCTOBER 2022 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Premier Surgery Center Surgery Center Concord Professional Healthcare at Home, LLC dba: CenterWell Home Health Home Health Pleasant Hill Organizational Provider Approved by Medic al Director October 19 , 20 22 CREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDER OCTOBER 2022 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Journey Health Medical Group of California Community Health Worker Services Oakland bop l-October 14 and 19 , 2 022 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to issue a payment on behalf of the Public Works Director in the amount of $2,300 from County Service Area R-7 (CSA R-7) payable to the Alamo Rotary Foundation of Alamo for the holiday lights at Andrew H. Young Park, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% County Service Area R-7 Funds. BACKGROUND: CSA R-7 residents participate in Alamo’s Annual Tree Lighting Festival each year. The Alamo Tree Lighting Festival is a collaborative effort coordinated by the Rotary Club of Alamo. CSA R-7 contributes the use of Andrew H. Young Park and provides funding to decorate the park with holiday lights. The 2022 Alamo Tree Lighting Festival will take place on Sunday, December 4, 2022 from 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. The lights will be installed on or after November 15, 2022 and will remain up through January 15, 2023. The recommended CSA R-7 contribution was reviewed by the Alamo Municipal Advisory Council (Alamo MAC) at their meeting on November 1, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rochelle Johnson (925) 313-2299 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Cameron Collins- BOS , Diana Oyler - Finance , Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Scott Anderson - Special Districts C. 98 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve & Authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a payment of $2,300 to the Alamo Rotary Foundation for the holiday lights, Alamo area. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board approval the quality of this event would be diminished. ATTACHMENTS Alamo MAC Agenda RECOMMENDATION(S): Accept the Annual Report of the Kensington Municipal Advisory Council (KMAC). FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: An Annual Report for advisory bodies is due in December. Resolution No. 2020/1 requires that each advisory board, commission, or committee report annually on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Robert Rogers, 510.942.2224 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 99 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Kensington Municipal Advisory Council Annual Report 2022 ATTACHMENTS kmacreport2022 Advisory Body Name: Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location: Chair (during the reporting period): Staff Person (during the reporting period): Reporting Period: I. Activities (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the activities for the past year including areas of study, work, special events, collaborations, etc. ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT II. Accomplishments (estimated response length: 1/2 page) Describe the accomplishments for the past year, particularly in reference to your work plan and objectives. III.Attendance/Representation (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe your membership in terms of seat vacancies, diversity, level of participation, and frequency of achieving a quorum at meetings. Describe the advisory body's workplan, including specific objectives to be achieved in the upcoming year. V. Proposed Work Plan/Objectives for Next Year IV. Training/Certification (estimated response length: 1/4 page) Describe any training that was provided or conducted, and any certifications received, either as a requirement or done on an elective basis by members. NOTE: Please forward copies of any training certifications to the Clerk of the Board. (estimated response length: 1/2 page) RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact BACKGROUND: Section 1108-2.212 of the County Ordinance Code authorizes the Purchasing Agent to dispose of any personal property belonging to Contra Costa County and found by the Board of Supervisors not to be required for public use. The property for disposal is either obsolete, worn out, beyond economical repair, or damaged beyond repair. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Public Works would not be able to dispose of surplus vehicles and equipment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Nida Rivera, (925) 313-2124 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.100 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Disposal of Surplus Property ATTACHMENTS Surplus Vehicles & Equipment ATTACHMENT TO BOARD ORDER FOR NOVEMBER 29, 2022 Department Description/Unit/Make/Model Serial No. Condition A. Obsolete B. Worn Out C. Beyond economical repair D. Damaged beyond repair ANIMAL SERVICES 2011 FORD F-250 ANIMAL BOX TRUCK # 5482 (152640 MILES) 1FD7X2A66BEB76352 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 FORD RANGER TRUCK # 5079 (88055 MILES) 1FTKR1EE6APA34848 B. WORN OUT AGRICULTURE 2007 ARCTIC CAT 500 ATV # 9136 () 4UFO7ATV57T241921 B. WORN OUT AGRICULTURE 1998 HONDA TRX-250 ATV # 9081 () 478T2115WA100995 B. WORN OUT AGRICULTURE 2001 HONDA TRX-250 ATV # 9099 () 478TE210914128152 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 1991 NORDSKOG 150 TROLLY # 9004 () 150091E007 D. DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR PUBLIC WORKS 2003 EXMARK MOWER # 8219 () 400393 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2019 CHEVY TAHOE INTERCEPTOR # 3843 (104885 MILES) 1GNLCDEC1KR405644 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR HEALTH SERVICES 2012 FORD FUSION HYBRID # 0804 (101015 MILES) 3FADP0L34CR275450 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2016 FORD INTERCEPTOR SEDAN # 2562 (109512 MILES) 1FAHP2MT0GG107071 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR PUBLIC WORKS 2008 FORD E-350 PASSENGER VAN # 4730 (98261 MILES) 1FBSS31L88DA19031 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2015 FORD FUSION HYBRID # 0881 (143547 M ILES) 3FA6P0LU3FR307794 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2016 FORD INTERCEPTOR SEDAN # 2565 (73643 MILES) 1FAHP2MT1GG144839 D. DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR SHERIFF 1991 NORDSKOG 150 TROLLY 150091E008 D. DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE a publication of a Notice of Intention (“NOI”) to convey one Fee parcel, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 074-080-034, to the City of Antioch (City) through a Grant Deed, pursuant to Government Code Section 25365. (Project No. 4500-80A855; TG0855) (CP#22-31) (District V) DECLARE that this Board will meet on December 13, 2022, at 9 a.m. or thereafter, in the Board’s Chambers, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California, to consummate the conveyance. DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to publish the attached NOI in a newspaper published in the County pursuant to Government Code Section 6061. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mark apHugh, 925.957.2452 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.101 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE Notice of Intention to convey Real Property to the City of Antioch, Antioch area. BACKGROUND: On March 24, 2020, the County purchased a 4.79-acre vacant parcel located along the southerly side of Delta Fair Boulevard, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 074-080-034 (Property), from the City for the sum of $1.00. The Property was purchased for future development of a facility for the County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division (H3), for use as a navigation and assessment center, emergency shelter, transitional housing and/or permanent support for homeless individuals. The grant deed conveying the Property to the County contains two specific deed restrictions, one of which is the right by the City to reenter and take possession of the Property if the County fails “to commence construction of the facility for the Approved Use within two years after recording of the grant deed.” Due to various circumstances, including the Covid-19 pandemic, the County has been unable to break ground on the project in the two-year timeframe. As a result, the City has elected to exercise its right to take possession of the Property. The County is prepared to comply with the City’s decision and both parties have determined that a grant deed is the most appropriate method to revest all of the County’s right, title and interest in the Property back to the City. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County will not have fulfilled their responsibilities in the grant deed, which may cause the City to take action to enforce their reversionary interest in the Property. ATTACHMENTS Notice of Intention CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County declares it intends to convey one Fee parcel, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 074 -080-034, located along the southerly side of Delta Fair Boulevard, in the City of Antioch, California, to the City of A ntioch through a Grant Deed in response to a decision by the City to exercise a reversionary right in the property. A description of the proposed Fee area is available at the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez CA. The Board will meet on Tuesday, December 13, 2022, at 9 a.m. or thereafter, in its Chambers, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California, to consummate the conveyance. Publication Date: December 5, 2022 _____________________________ _____________________________ RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #26-209-13 with University of the Pacific for its Department of Physical Therapy, an educational institution, effective December 31, 2022, to amend Contract #26-209-12, to include occupational therapy students to receive field instruction experience at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers with no change in the original term of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a nonfinancial agreement. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide University of the Pacific students with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefiting from the students’ services to patients. The County’s Health Services Department has been contracting with University of the Pacific since September 1, 1990. On April 26, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-209-12 with University of the Pacific for its Department of Physical Therapy for the provision of supervised field instruction experience for physical and speech therapy students at Contra Costa Health Services, for the period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-209-13 will allow the addition of occupational therapy students to receive field instruction at CCRMC and Health Centers through December 31, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the contractor’s students of occupational therapy will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5501 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.102 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #26-209-13 with University of the Pacific for its Department of Physical Therapy RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Director, Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, to submit Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan Grant Materials to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as recommended by the Sustainability Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Submission of the proposed grant materials is expected to result in a grant award of $750,000 to the Department of Conservation and Development to fund the Just Transition activities described in this Board Order and the attached Project Narrative. No local matching funds are required as a condition of the County accepting these funds. BACKGROUND: In September 2020, the Board of Supervisors (Board) adopted a Climate Emergency Resolution that, among other things, resolves “that the Board of Supervisors and the County Sustainability Commission seek input from the community (with a special focus on highly impacted Environmental Justice communities), workers (especially impacted workers), and business/industry to help the County anticipate and plan for an economy that is less dependent on fossil fuels, helps plan for a "Just Transition" away from a fossil-fuel dependent economy, and considers how the County's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic can incorporate the County's climate goals. As the State of California adopts policies and goals for reducing pollution and addressing climate change, the County will develop strategies to improve the health, safety, infrastructure, job opportunities and revenue opportunities during the shift to a zero-emission economy. The County will provide special attention to helping develop new opportunities for frontline and impacted communities that realize economic, health and other benefits. The Commission will include this topic in its ongoing advice to the Board of Supervisors.” The County’s engagement on Just Transition will build on and complement the ongoing work of the County and seven city partners on the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, as further discussed below. In October 2020, the Sustainability Commission received a report on Just Transition efforts in other communities in the U.S. and internationally. In March 2021, the Sustainability Committee discussed options for a process that will facilitate an inclusive Just Transition. That meeting included a presentation from Assemblymember Tim Grayson on AB 844, the Green Empowerment Zone legislation, which was subsequently APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alyson Greenlee, 925-655-2783 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.103 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved and signed into law. The meeting also included a presentation from Congressman Mark DeSaulnier on federal legislation he was sponsoring to prepare the community for the impacts of refinery closures. In 2020, two of the four oil refineries in Contra Costa County, Marathon and Phillips 66, submitted applications to manufacture renewable fuel in lieu of fossil fuels. Those applications were approved by the Board in May 2022 and are awaiting permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. The approvals for both projects included detailed requirements to implement a Demolition and Site Clean-Up/Reuse Program. Both refineries also entered into Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs) that will provide substantial funding to the County that the County will allocate to “projects and programs that benefit the communities near the Refinery by improving the health, well-being, and quality of life of residents, and that support building and sustaining a strong and resilient local economy and workforce, including the development and implementation of workforce development and training programs to prepare residents for new renewable and clean energy career pathways and jobs”. Both refineries have also committed through their CBAs “to actively participate with other appropriate stakeholders in planning and designing a Workforce Training Program for local community members related to renewable and clean energy employment opportunities”. The County is in the process of accepting a $750,000 Community Project Funding (CPF) grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to develop a Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan, a long-term strategic planning process resulting in a roadmap for implementing land use changes to attract and accommodate businesses in the industry clusters identified through the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative (Initiative), which include advanced materials and diversified manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, food processing, clean tech, advanced transportation technology, and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy; workforce (re)training to transition from fossil fuel-related industries to other forms of production and employment that are clean and sustainable; and promoting equity in helping Contra Costa County achieve its economic development goals. HUD has requested that the County’s grant materials be submitted by December 31, 2022. The pending grant award is the result of the Board’s direction to seek a Congressional earmark for work on this topic and the work of Representative Mark DeSaulnier and his colleagues to seek and secure a funding appropriation through the federal budget process. The Sustainability Committee will be making recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on how this funding will be used in the County’s Just Transition efforts. The initial work on Just Transition funded by the federal grant is anticipated to be an 18-24 month process, and one that will lead to further innovation, and, presuming additional funding can be identified, future phases to be pursued over time. Federal grant funds will be used to lead a robust countywide stakeholder engagement process, ensuring that residents of impacted Environmental Justice communities, workers and labor unions, business and industry, local government, environmental justice and environmental interests, community colleges, the workforce development system, and other relevant stakeholders help guide the work and are invested in its outcomes. The federal grant funds will also be used to conduct economic analysis identifying future opportunities and constraints as well as land use and environmental analysis to help guide planning. Workforce transitions and training needed to support career pathways in the industry clusters identified in the Initiative and the associated necessary investments in the labor force are another critical component of the work to be initiated with the federal funds. The work will culminate in a Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan, which is a roadmap to move forward with an equitable Contra Costa Just Transition. This will provide a sustainable, feasible plan to make Contra Costa the hub for production and employment in advanced materials and diversified manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, food processing, clean tech, advanced transportation technology, and other sectors that support the green energy economy-- with a trained workforce ready to go, and the land use needs of businesses met in industrial areas that were historically part of the petroleum-based economic sector now transitioning to a zero-emission economy. The Sustainability Committee discussed this at a special meeting on October 24, 2022. Staff received direction from the Sustainability Committee on the grant materials. The grant materials are being submitted to the Board with sufficient time to seek approval from the Board of Supervisors prior to the submittal deadline. ATTACHMENTS Project Narrative Budget 1 Project Narrative Short Project Description: The Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan (Economic Revitalization Plan) Project is a long-term strategic planning process that will result in (1) a roadmap for workforce training and land uses changes to attract and accommodate businesses in the industry clusters identified in the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative (the Initiative) and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy, and (2) an implementation strategy. The Economic Revitalization Plan will help Contra Costa County anticipate and plan for the transition from a historically petroleum-based economic sector to an economy that is driven by the industry clusters identified in the Initiative including advanced materials & diversified manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, food processing, clean tech, advanced transportation technology, and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy. As the home to four of the five oil refineries in the San Francisco Bay Area, Contra Costa County is at the forefront of a larger movement in California to revitalize our economy as we move away from fossil fuels during the shift to a zero-emission economy. Contra Costa County is home to 25 census tracts that the State of California considers “disadvantaged” using its CalEnviroScreen criteria. Many of these census tracts are clustered in areas near oil refineries and related industrial uses. The residents of these areas experience higher rates of asthma and other illnesses and have historically been underserved by our government at every level. Contra Costa County is committed to addressing this historic injustice and is looking for every opportunity to do so in this work by providing special attention to helping develop new opportunities for frontline and impacted communities, including soliciting meaningful input from these communities into the development of the Economic Revitalization Plan and improving the health and job opportunities for residents in these communities. The Economic Revitalization Plan is a time-sensitive priority; in 2020, two of the four oil refineries in Contra Costa County submitted applications to manufacture renewable fuel in lieu of fossil fuels. Those applications were approved by the Board of Supervisors in May 2022. The shift to a zero-emission economy will affect the entire industrial sector as many supply chain companies are in the county. To navigate this major shift in employment, revenue, and associated impacts, Contra Costa residents and workers as well as the County itself want to ensure that there are intentional workforce and land use transitions to support this monumental change. The intended use of Community Project Funding (CPF) grant is the long-term strategic planning process resulting in the Economic Revitalization Plan roadmap. Contra Costa County will support the remainder of the implementation strategy using existing County revenues, and/or seek additional grants or philanthropic contributions, not yet in hand. Detailed Description of Intended Uses of CPF Grant: The intended use of Community Project Funding (CPF) grant is the Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan (Economic Revitalization Plan), a long-term strategic planning process resulting in a roadmap for workforce (re)training and land use changes to attract and accommodate businesses in the industry clusters identified in the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative (the Initiative) and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy, as Contra Costa County transitions from its historically petroleum-based economic sector. 2 The Economic Revitalization Plan will help Contra Costa County anticipate and plan for the transition from a historically petroleum-based economic sector to an economy that is driven by the industry clusters identified in the Initiative including advanced materials & diversified manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, food processing, clean tech, advanced transportation technology, and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy. Using lessons learned from similar types of regions in transition-- such as Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant in San Luis Obispo County, California, and coal plants in Appalachia--the Economic Revitalization Plan will create a framework for a uniquely Contra Costa just transition program that incorporates the concerns expressed by frontline and impacted communities. The CPF grant will jumpstart this work. The Economic Revitalization Plan will be aligned with and build on the County’s existing visions in the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative and the County’s Envision 2040 General Plan update. It will provide special attention for developing new opportunities for frontline and impacted communities that realize economic, health, and other benefits. It will develop strategies to improve the health, safety, infrastructure, job opportunities, and revenue opportunities during the shift to a zero- emission economy. It will also respond to the County Board of Supervisors’ declaration of a climate emergency. The intended uses of this CPF grant—and the activities of the Economic Revitalization Plan—are to support a robust stakeholder engagement process, conduct specialized studies and economic analysis, and support county staff-- culminating in a Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan, which is a roadmap to move forward with a just transition in Contra Costa County. This roadmap will include the workforce transitions needed to support this pivot, and the land use changes to attract and accommodate businesses in the industry clusters identified by the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero- emission economy, as the impacts trickle along the supply chain and existing workforce pipelines. This is a plan to make Contra Costa the hub for production and employment in advanced materials & diversified manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, food processing, clean tech, advanced transportation technology, and other sectors that support the green energy economy—with a trained workforce ready to go, and the land use needs of businesses met in industrial areas that were historically part of the petroleum-based economic sector that are now a long-term success in the transition to a zero-emission economy. The detailed descriptions of the activities that are intended for the use of CPF funds are below: 1.Community Engagement: The Economic Revitalization Plan will support a robust stakeholder engagement process. The communities closest to the refineries in Contra Costa County align with the State's disadvantaged communities map and are the intended main beneficiaries of the community revitalization planning effort in the Economic Revitalization Plan. The federal funds will be spent for community outreach and engagement (including stakeholder meeting support services for stipends, translation, childcare, and community ambassadors) and will identify the Economic Revitalization Plan’s implementation priorities. The engagement process will include a stakeholder table that includes the two members of the County’s Sustainability Committee, labor/workers, frontline environmental justice community representatives, local government, 3 business/industry sector, workforce development and training entities, education sector (community colleges / County Office of Education) and academic partners. 2.Economic Analysis: The transition of two major refineries to manufacture renewable fuel in lieu of fossil fuels will affect employees and all of Contra Costa County, which is home to significant off-site refinery- supporting industry and employment, and the shift to a zero-emission economy will have even greater impacts on jobs and revenues. The Economic Revitalization Plan will analyze impacts on the current workforce and economy and will identify more specific economic development opportunities for the affected areas. It will also identify areas for retraining the current workforce for future high-wage jobs and training the frontline and impacted communities who will be seeking employment close to home for jobs that have long-term economic benefit and grow the local economy and tax base. 3.Specialized Studies: The Economic Revitalization Plan will rely on additional specialized studies necessary to inform the planning and public engagement process, likely including but not limited to environmental studies, land use analysis, and analysis of similar efforts in other areas. The Economic Revitalization Plan’s specialized studies will align with and build on existing priorities in the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative and the County’s Envision 2040 General Plan update to support this transition. 4.Staffing: Developing the Economic Revitalization Plan will take an estimated 18-24 months. We anticipate the Economic Revitalization Plan will develop strategies that improve the health, safety, infrastructure, job opportunities, and revenue opportunities during the shift to a zero-emission economy. It will be of direct benefit in helping develop new opportunities for frontline and impacted communities that realize economy, health, and other benefits. The outcome of this process is the Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan, a long-term strategic planning process resulting in a roadmap for workforce (re)training and land use changes to support the economic transition that is unique to Contra Costa County. Maximum Anticipated Scope of the Project: The work of this project will continue beyond the usage of the CPF grant and will be sustained through the anticipated development of a detailed implementation strategy and the proposed assignment of an implementation coordinator to lead implementation of the Economic Revitalization Plan. Funding for this implementation phase of the project has not yet been identified. The implementation strategy will identify scalable projects from the findings of the Economic Revitalization Plan’s economic analysis, specialized studies, and community engagement process. The actual implementation priorities will be determined by the community engagement process. Examples of projects that could be part of the implementation strategy include but are not limited to: •Workforce development: Partnerships to support workforce development training programs for the current workforce and frontline and impacted communities, including training opportunities in high schools and community colleges. 4 •Economic development: Programs to attract family-sustaining jobs consistent with the Economic Revitalization Plan and the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative and other sectors that support the green energy economy and the shift to a zero-emission economy. •Clean energy: Installations to benefit impacted neighborhoods and specified income levels in affected community areas. •Community improvement: Park, trails, and playground upgrades in affected community areas. Environmental review will commence after the Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan is completed and the pilot implementation project is identified. The pilot project will be consistent with the adopted Five Year Consolidated Plan of the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium. The Department of Conservation and Development at Contra Costa County has multiple in-house National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) experts and is highly qualified to conduct the environmental review. The implementation strategy will commence after the Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan is completed. Implementation will take an estimated 12-24 months. Attachments Attached are the Standard Form SF-424 and the Budget. (There are no lobbying activities in association with this award. The Standard Form SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities has been reviewed and does not apply and has been omitted from these materials). Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan (Economic Revitalization Plan) Project Expense Amount Funding Cost Type Stakeholder Outreach/Stakeholder Meeting Support (Stipends,Translators, Childcare, Community Ambassadors, etc.)$200,000.00 Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant Activity Delivery Economic Analyses $200,000.00 Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant Activity Delivery Detailed Studies (Environmental, Other Specialized Subjects)$150,000.00 Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant Activity Delivery County Staffing $150,000.00 Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant Activity Delivery Administration $50,000.00 Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant Administrative Implementation Strategy $200,000.00 Non-CPF Activity Delivery Implementation Coordinator $125,000.00 Non-CPF Activity Delivery Predevelopment Costs; Construction, Renovation, and Rehabilitation Costs; Acquisition, Demolition, and Site Preparation; Architectural and Engineering Fees; Initial Set Asides for Revolving Loan Funds $625,000.00 Non-CPF Activity Delivery Administration $50,000.00 Non-CPF Administrative Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan (Economic Revitalization Plan) Project Budget Row Labels Sum of Amount Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant $750,000.00 Administration $50,000.00 County Staffing $150,000.00 Detailed Studies (Environmental, Other Specialized Subjects)$150,000.00 Economic Analyses $200,000.00 Stakeholder Outreach/Stakeholder Meeting Support (Stipends,Translators, Childcare, Community Ambassadors, etc.)$200,000.00 Non-CPF $1,000,000.00 Administration $50,000.00 Implementation Coordinator $125,000.00 Implementation Strategy $200,000.00 Predevelopment Costs; Construction, Renovation, and Rehabilitation Costs; Acquisition, Demolition, and Site Preparation; Architectural and Engineering Fees; Initial Set Asides for Revolving Loan Funds $625,000.00 Grand Total $1,750,000.00 Just Transition Economic Revitalization Plan (Economic Revitalization Plan) Project Budget Row Labels Sum of Amount Community Project Funding (CPF) Grant $750,000.00 Activity Delivery $700,000.00 Administrative $50,000.00 Non-CPF $1,000,000.00 Activity Delivery $950,000.00 Administrative $50,000.00 Grand Total $1,750,000.00 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a waiver of the County policy that requires competitive bidding for community-based services to enable the Health Services Department to expend limited one-time Federal Substance Abuse Block Grant (SABG) Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) funding for the period July 1, 2021 – December 31, 2022 recently awarded for alcohol and other drugs services by the December 31, 2022 federal deadline. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Federal funds; Substance Abuse Block Grant (SABG) Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA). BACKGROUND: The California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) provides funding to counties for Substance Abuse Disorder (SUD) prevention and treatment services through a contractual mechanism. This contract is supported by State General Fund, Federal Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant (SABG) and the federal share of reimbursement claimed for Drug Medi-Cal services. In late August 2021, the Health Services Department was notified by the DHCS of the availability of additional one-time only SABG funds Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) & American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) A requirement of award for these funds is that they must be fully expended between December 31, 2022. Health Services Alcohol and Other Drugs Services (AODS) submitted to the State an itemized budget with a proposed list of allowed SABG services including Recovery Housing. The availability of excess or underspent SABG funds is unusual. The period of time allowed for counties to respond to this unique opportunity was just a few weeks. The subsequent official approval of the State-County contract for the additional funds was also delayed and became effective only at the end of December 2021. That DHCS approached our county corresponds to AODS's good standing with the State and the State's confidence that the County has the needs and capacity to expend the funding within the stipulated short timeframe. The funds cannot be carried over; if funding is not spent within the timeframe, it will be forfeited. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Fatima Matal-Sol, (925)348-3279 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.104 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Request for a One-Time Waiver of the County Policy Requiring Competitive Bidding for Community-Based Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The County has a policy requiring contracts with community-based organizations in excess of $50,000 to be competitively bid. The policy stipulates, however, that the Board of Supervisors may, upon the recommendation of the County Administrator, waive the policy. In accordance with County policy, Alcohol and Other Drugs Services (AODS) distributed a Request for Interest on October 28, 2022 for funds specifically to be utilized for Recovery Residences within the County with a deadline for responses of November 10, 2022 at 12pm PST. The goal was to determine the level of interest in the funding prior to potentially moving to a full Request for Qualifications. As of the deadline, only one interested party responded to the request. Due to the sole response, AODS is requesting to forego additional steps and move forward without the required three responses. Under regular circumstances, AODS would adhere to County competitive bidding policy and processes, and work closely with community-based organizations to establish contractual agreements. If the waiver is approved, AODS would amend the current contract with Shelter Inc. with the additional funding and requirements. This sole responder is a current Recovery Residence monitoring subcontractor with AODS that is in good standing and able to provide the necessary services with this particular funding, which will expire on December 31, 2022. Due to the extenuating circumstances just described, the County Administrator recommends a waiver to contract with an organization to provide recovery residence services for individuals diagnosed with SUD and actively participating in intensive outpatient treatment services. Because of the implementation of the Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS) in Contra Costa County, the Health Services Department has effectively eliminated long waiting lists to enter SUD residential treatment. Likewise, as a result of the DMC-ODS, the County received a waiver to fund recovery residences through SAPT-BG funds. Providing an AOD-free housing environment supports outpatient SUD treatment and long term sobriety. Approval of this recommendation would help the Health Services Department fulfill one of the proposed activities through the SAPT-BG grant award, further the goals of the DMC-ODS waiver of implementing evidence-based practices, support the ongoing treatment of individuals in a safe AOD-free environment, and avoid the forfeiture of supplemental funds to DHCS. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Health Services Department will likely forfeit some of the supplemental SABG funding designated for recovery residences due to the short timeframe in which the funds must be expended. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Counsel, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County a conflict waiver acknowledging a potential conflict of interest and consenting to Fennemore, LLP, doing business as Fennemore Wendel, representing the Contra Costa Transportation Authority while continuing to provide legal services to the County related to eminent domain and real property matters. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Fennemore, LLP (Fennemore) provides legal services to the County related to eminent domain and real property matters where the County is acquiring property for County projects. Eminent domain is a specialized area of the law; the firm is one of a limited number of firms with expertise in this area. The firm was recently engaged by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to serve as general counsel for CCTA. Because from time to time the interests of the County and CCTA are adverse, to comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct promulgated by the California State Bar, Fennemore is requesting APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Stephen M. Siptroth, Deputy County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.105 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE CONFLICT WAIVER WITH FENNEMORE LLP BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) that the County acknowledge and waive any known potential conflicts of interest that may be caused by the firm’s representation of both the County and CCTA, to the extent such representation is permitted under the State Bar rules. Under the State Bar’s rules, in the absence of the informed written consent of each client, an attorney is prohibited from representing a client if there is a significant risk that the attorney’s representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to or relationship with another client, a former client or a third person, or by the lawyer’s own interests. (Rule 1.7(b).) Even when a significant risk requiring a lawyer to comply with Rule 1.7(b) is not present, a lawyer is prohibited from representing a client without written disclosure of the relationship to the client where the lawyer has, or knows that another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm has, a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with or responsibility to a party or witness in the same matter. (Rule 1.7(c)(1).) The potential for a conflict of interest between the County and CCTA exists whenever (i) CCTA is providing funding for projects being carried out by the County, (ii) the County is providing funding for projects being carried out by CCTA, (iii) CCTA uses County-owned real property for a CCTA purpose, and (iv) CCTA and the County negotiate a new or amended project or program agreement. These situations are all unrelated to the work Fennemore does for the County on eminent domain. And in all of these situations, attorneys in the County Counsel’s office will serve as counsel for the County to protect the County’s interests. For these reasons, this office recommends the County consent to the requested conflict waiver, as described in the attached letter from Fennemore. If a conflict arises in the future that cannot be waived, or if the firm determines it cannot provide competent and diligent simultaneous representation to both the County and CCTA during the pendency of a particular matter, the firm will withdraw from representing the County, at least until the matter causing the (more serious) conflict is resolved. Should this occur, the County will use other outside counsel to handle any pending eminent domain matters. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County may need to contract with another law firm for these legal services. ATTACHMENTS Fennemore Letter RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the Board of Supervisors has reconsidered the circumstances of the Statewide state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, and the Countywide local emergency proclaimed by the Board of Supervisors on March 10, 2020. 2. FIND that the following circumstances exist: (a) the Statewide state of emergency and the Countywide local emergency continue to directly impact the ability of the Board of Supervisors in all its capacities, its committees, and its advisory bodies to meet safely in person because the highly transmissible Omicron variant of COVID-19 and its subvariants are present in the County; and (b) the County Health Officer's recommendations for safely holding public meetings, which recommend virtual meetings and other measures to promote social distancing, are still in effect. 3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Supervisors, in its capacity as the governing board of the County, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and the Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, and its subcommittees, to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days. 4. AUTHORIZE all advisory bodies, committees, and commissions established by the Board in all its capacities, including but not limited to municipal advisory councils and the Measure X Community Advisory Body, to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days. 5. REQUIRE advisory bodies, commissions, and committees whose jurisdiction extends into all Supervisorial districts ("Countywide bodies") that hold in-person meetings to conduct these meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the Countywide body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. 6. ENCOURAGE advisory bodies whose jurisdiction does not extend into all Supervisorial districts ("limited jurisdiction bodies") to conduct any live meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the limited jurisdiction body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mary Ann McNett Mason, County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Mary Ann McNett Mason, County Counsel, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors C.106 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Continuing Teleconference Meetings (AB 361, Government Code § 54953(e)) RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) 7. REQUEST that the Planning Commission, Merit Board, and Assessment Appeals Board consider holding teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days or holding meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. 8. DIRECT the County Administrator/Clerk of the Board and staff to the various Board advisory bodies to take all actions necessary to implement the intent and purpose of this Board order, including conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and all other applicable provisions of the Brown Act. 9. DIRECT the County Administrator/Clerk of the Board to return to the Board acting in all its capacities, no later than 30 days after this Board order is adopted, with an item to reconsider the state of emergency and whether to continue authorizing virtual meetings under the provisions of Government Code section 54953(e) and to make required findings as to all bodies covered by this Board order. FISCAL IMPACT: This is an administrative action with no direct fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On October 5, 2021, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2021/327, which authorized the Board, in all its capacities, and certain subcommittees and advisory bodies, to conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e). This section of the Brown Act, which was added by Assembly Bill 361, allows a local agency to use special teleconferencing rules during a State declared state of emergency. When a legislative body uses the emergency teleconferencing provisions under Government code section 54953(e), the following rules apply: The agency must provide notice of the meeting and post an agenda as required by the Brown Act and Better Government Ordinance, but the agenda does not need to list each teleconference location or be physically posted at each teleconference location. The agenda must state how members of the public can access the meeting and provide public comment. The agenda must include an option for all persons to attend via a call-in or internet-based service option. The body must conduct the meeting in a manner that protects the constitutional and statutory rights of the public. If there is a disruption in the public broadcast of the meeting, or of the public's ability to comment virtually for reasons within the body's control, the legislative body must stop the meeting and take no further action on agenda items until public access and/or ability to comment is restored. Local agencies may not require public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and must allow virtual comments to be submitted in real time. The body must allow a reasonable amount of time per agenda item to permit members of the public to comment, including time to register or otherwise be recognized for the purposes of comment. If the body provides a timed period for all public comment on an item, it may not close that period before the time has elapsed. AB 361 sunsets on January 1, 2024. Under Government Code section 54953(e), if the local agency wishes to continue using these special teleconferencing rules after adopting an initial resolution, the legislative body must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency every 30 days and make certain findings. The agency must find that the state declared emergency continues to exist and either that it continues to directly impact the ability of officials and members of the public to meet safely in person, or that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. The Board last considered these matters on November 8, 2022, made the required findings and authorized continued use of special teleconferencing rules. The Board can again find that the Statewide state of emergency continues to exist, that the state and Countywide local emergencies continue to directly impact the ability of the Board of Supervisors in all its capacities, and its subcommittees, and advisory bodies to meet safely in person, and that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. The Public Health Officer has advised that the highly transmissible Omicron variant of COVID-19 and its subvariants are present in the County. In addition, on November 17, 2022, the County Health Officer again issued recommendations for safely holding public meetings that included recommended measures to promote social distancing as the current trends of COVID-19 case rates, test positivity, hospitalizations, and wastewater surveillance are increasing (See Attachment A, Health Officer's Recommendations). Among the Health Officer's recommendations: (1) on-line meetings (teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged as those meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19; (2) if a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended when possible to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person; (3) a written safety protocol should be developed and followed, and it is recommended that the protocol require social distancing - i.e., six feet of separation between attendees; (4) seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times; and (5) all meeting attendees should be strongly encouraged to wear masks and to be up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board, in all its capacities, and its subcommittees and advisory bodies, would no longer conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A, Health Officer's Recommendations Recommendations for safely holding public meetings Each local government agency is authorized to determine whether to hold public meetings in person, on-line (teleconferencing only), or via a combination of methods. The following are recommendations from the Contra Costa County Health Officer to minimize the risk of COVID 19 transmission during a public meeting. 1. Online meetings (i.e. teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged, where practical, as these meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID 19. This is particularly important when community prevalence rates are high. Our current trends as of November 17, 2022 in Covid-19 case rate, test positivity, Covid-19 hospitalizations, and Covid-19 wastewater surveillance are increasing. In addition to this, the predominant variant of Covid-19 being identified continues to be the Omicron variant and it’s subvariants the impact of which on the spread of Covid-19 has shown to dramatically increase COVID-19 transmission. 2. If a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended, when possible, to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person. 3. A written safety protocol should be developed and followed. It is recommended that the protocol require social distancing, where feasible – i.e. six feet of separation between attendees; and consider requiring or strongly encouraging face masking of all attendees and encouraging attendees to be up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccine. 4. Seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times. 5. Consider holding public meetings outdoors. Increasing scientific consensus is that outdoor airflow reduces the risk of COVID-19 transmission compared to indoor spaces. Hosting events outdoors also may make it easier to space staff and members of the public at least 6 feet apart. If unable to host outdoors, consider ways to increase ventilation and flow of the indoor space to reduce the risk of COVID-19 while indoors. 6. Current evidence is unclear as to the added benefit of temperature checks in addition to symptom checks. We encourage focus on symptom checks as they may screen out individuals with other Covid-19 symptoms besides fever and help reinforce the message to not go out in public if you are not feeling well. 7. Consider a voluntary attendance sheet with names and contact information to assist in contact tracing of any cases linked to a public meeting. Revised 11-17-2022 Sefanit Mekuria, MD, MPH Deputy Health Officer, Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE clarification of Board action taken on October 4, 2022 (C.50) to reflect the following: (1) the correct name of the contracting agency is RossDrulisCusenbery Architecture, Inc., rather than Ross, Drulis, Cusenbery Architecture; (2) the correct payment limit is an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, rather than an amount not to exceed $900,000; and (3) the correct term is for the period November 29, 2022 through November 28, 2027, with two one-year extension options, rather than for the period September 13, 2022 through September 12, 2027, with an option for a one-year extension. (100% CCCFPD Capital Construction Fund) FISCAL IMPACT: Contractual expenditures of up to $1,500,000 over a 5-year period will be funded 100% CCCFPD Capital Construction Fund. BACKGROUND: On October 4, 2022, the Board of Supervisors, acting as the CCCFPD Board of Directors, approved a recommendation to approve and authorize the Fire Chief, or designee, to execute a contract with Ross, Drulis, Cusenbery Architecture to provide on-call architectural services for various fire station related projects. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Aaron McAlister, Deputy Fire Chief (925) 941-3300 x1101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.107 To:Board of Supervisors From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of October 4, 2022 Board Agenda Item #C.50 regarding Ross, Drulis, Cusenbery Architecture BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Due to an administrative error, the consultant name, the intended payment limit, and the contract term were incorrectly stated in the Board Order. The clarification requested reflects the original intent of the Fire District and the professional service needs of the targeted projects as anticipated by the Fire District. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If clarification of the October 4, 2022 Board action is not approved, the Fire District will not be able to execute a contract with the consultant and will not be able to proceed with all of the anticipated fire station related projects. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE clarification of Board action taken on October 4, 2022 (C.52) to reflect the following: (1) the correct name of the contracting agency is Shah Kawasaki Architects, Inc., rather than Shah Kawasaki Architects; (2) the correct payment limit is an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, rather than an amount not to exceed $900,000; and (3) the correct term is the period November 29, 2022 through November 28, 2027, with two one-year extension options, rather than for the period September 13, 2022 through September 12, 2027, with an option for a one-year extension. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractual expenditures of up to $1,500,000 over a 5-year period will be funded 100% by CCCFPD Capital Construction Fund. BACKGROUND: On October 4, 2022, the Board of Supervisors, acting as the CCCFPD Board of Directors, approved a recommendation to approve and authorize the Fire Chief, or designee, to execute a contract with Shah Kawasaki Architects to provide on-call architectural services for various fire station related projects. Due to an administrative error, the consultant name, the intended payment limit, and the contract term were incorrectly stated in the Board Order. The clarification requested reflects the original intent of the Fire District and the professional service needs of the targeted projects as anticipated by the Fire District. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Aaron McAlister, Deputy Fire Chief (925) 941-3300 x1101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.108 To:Board of Supervisors From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of October 4, 2022 Board Agenda Item #C.52 regarding Shah Kawasaki Architects CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If clarification of the October 4, 2022 Board action is not approved, the Fire District will be forced to either reduce the scope of work or delay portions of the intended projects. RECOMMENDATION(S): RESCIND Board action of August 16, 2022 (C.64), which pertained to a contract with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #24-409-47 with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $4,450,600, to provide mental health services including wraparound and outpatient treatment to children in West County for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023, in an amount not to exceed $2,225,300. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in an annual budgeted expenditure of up to $4,450,600 for fiscal Year 2022/2023 and will be funded by 50% ($2,225,300) Federal Medi-Cal, 45% ($2,002,770) Mental Health Realignment, and 5% ($222,530) by Measure X Fund. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs ofthe County’s population by providing school and community based mental health services, including assessments, individual, group and family therapy; medication support, case management, outreach, and crisis intervention services, to an underserved population and will result in greater home, community, and school success. Early Childhood Mental Health Program has been providing mental health services to the county since May 1, 1987. On January 18, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24-409-45 with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau in an amount not to exceed $3,846,000 for the provision of specialized mental health services including in-home behavioral health services to children and their families in West Contra Costa County for the period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,923,000. On February 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #24-409-46 with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, to modify the rate schedule due to COVID 19 with no change in the payment limit of $3,846,000 or term July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, including an automatic extension through December 31, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,923,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5169 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C.109 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Rescind Prior Board Action Pertaining to Contracted Services with Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On August 16, 2022 the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #24-409-47 in an amount not to exceed $4,450,600, to provide mental health services including wraparound and outpatient treatment to children in West County for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023, in an amount not to exceed $2,225,300. This Board Order is to adjust the prior approved action to include Measure X Funding by revising the Fiscal Impact as intended by the Health Services Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommendation is not approved, the prior Board action will not be corrected to include the intended Measure X Funding to be utilized for this contract action. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This Early and Periodic Screening Diagnostic and Treatment Program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) and a decrease in juvenile offender recidivism as measured by probation database information. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/412 approving the revised Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) as approved by the Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB) and as recommeneded by the Public Protection Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the creation of the ESPB to serve in an advisory capacity on emergency preparedness planning efforts and the coordination of planning efforts throughout the County, including the County EOP. The ESPB met on September 22, 2022 and unanimously approved the draft revision of the County’s EOP and forwarded the recommendation to the Public Protection Committee for further discussion and approval. The Public Protection Committee (PPC) met on October 24, 2022 and approved the draft EOP to be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors for adoption. County Ordinance Code section 42-2.1004 requires that the Board of Supervisors adopt the County's EOP by resolution. Today's action would adopt the update EOP, which supersedes all previous versions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rick Kovar (925) 655-0123 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.110 To:Board of Supervisors From:PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPTION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The 2022 Emergency Operations Plan is included as Attachment A; the EOP Presentation to the PPC has also been included for reference as Attachment B. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County's Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) will be out of date and not reflect the collective updates and considerations of the Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB). AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/412 Attachment A - 2022 Emergency Operations Plan Attachment B - EOP Presentation to PPC MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/412 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 11/29/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/412 IN THE MATTER OF: ADOPTION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has authorized the creation of the Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB) to serve in an advisory capacity on emergency preparedness planning efforts and the coordination of such planning efforts throughout the County, including the County Emergency Operations Plan (EOP); WHEREAS, the ESPB met on September 22, 2022 and unanimously approved the draft revision of the County’s EOP and forwarded the recommendation to the Public Protection Committee for further discussion and approval; WHEREAS, the Public Protection Committee met on October 24, 2022 and approved the draft EOP to be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors for review and adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Adopts the updated Emergency Operations Plan attached hereto (Attachment A). 2. The adoption of the attached version of the Emergency Operations Plan supersedes all previous versions. Contact: Rick Kovar (925) 655-0123 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: i Table of Contents Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... iv Introductory Elements .......................................................................................................................... v Preface ................................................................................................................................................ v Letter of Approval .......................................................................................................................... 1 Approval and Implementation .................................................................................................. 2 Emergency Proclamations .......................................................................................................... 2 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 3 Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB) ............................................................................ 3 Operational Area Council (OAC)............................................................................................... 4 Plan Concurrence ........................................................................................................................... 5 Record of Changes ......................................................................................................................... 6 Plan Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 7 Plan Development and Maintenance ............................................................................................... 8 Steps in the Planning Process.................................................................................................... 9 Planning Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 9 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Preparedness ................................................................................................................................ 10 Response ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Recovery ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 12 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Situation Overview .............................................................................................................................. 13 History ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Population ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Local Setting .................................................................................................................................. 13 Hazards in Contra Costa County ............................................................................................ 16 Probability and Impact ............................................................................................................. 17 Earthquake .................................................................................................................................... 19 Landslide ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Severe Weather ............................................................................................................................ 20 Wildland Fire ................................................................................................................................ 20 Dam Failure ................................................................................................................................... 21 Levee Failure ................................................................................................................................. 21 Flood ................................................................................................................................................ 21 ii Sea Level Rise ............................................................................................................................... 22 Tsunami .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Drought ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Pandemic ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Capability Assessment .............................................................................................................. 23 Mitigation Overview .................................................................................................................. 24 PART I: BASIC PLAN ........................................................................................................................... 25 Concept of Operations ........................................................................................................................ 25 Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Coordination Levels .... 26 Incident Command System (ICS) and National Incident Management System (NIMS) ............................................................................................................................................. 28 California Emergency Support Functions .......................................................................... 28 Emergency Operations Center Organization ............................................................................ 33 Field/ EOC Communications and Coordination .............................................................. 33 Primary and Alternate EOC ..................................................................................................... 34 Response, Resource Coordination, and Mutual Aid ....................................................... 35 Operational Area (OA) EOC Activation ............................................................................... 35 Department Operation Center Activation ......................................................................... 36 EOC Reporting System .............................................................................................................. 36 Field Coordination with Department Operations Centers and EOCs...................... 37 Continuity of Government ................................................................................................................ 38 Vital Records Retention ............................................................................................................ 38 Recovery ................................................................................................................................................. 39 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Damage Assessment .................................................................................................................. 40 Documentation............................................................................................................................. 40 After Action Reporting .............................................................................................................. 41 PART II: SUPPORTING ELEMENTS ............................................................................................... 42 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. 43 APPENDIX A: Integrating People with Disabilities and with Access and Functional Needs ......................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix B: Alert and Warning ............................................................................................. 44 Appendix C: Population Protection ...................................................................................... 45 Appendix D: Prevention and Protection ............................................................................ 46 Appendix E: Worker Safety and Health .............................................................................. 47 Appendix F: Public Information ............................................................................................ 48 Appendix G: Private Sector Coordination .......................................................................... 52 iii Appendix H: Disaster Service Workers, Volunteers, and Donations Management ............................................................................................................................................................ 54 Appendix I: Training and Exercises ..................................................................................... 57 Appendix J: Authorities and References ............................................................................ 59 Appendix K: Individual and Family Emergency Preparedness ................................. 60 Appendix L: Emergency Management ................................................................................ 61 Appendix M: Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................ 62 iv Table of Figures Figure 1: Letter of approval ................................................................................................ 1 Figure 2: Emergency Services Policy Board record of concurrence ................................... 5 Figure 3: Record of revisions............................................................................................... 6 Figure 4: Record of distribution .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 5: The whole community approach describing access and functional needs ........ 8 Figure 6: Steps in the planning process .............................................................................. 9 Figure 7: The emergency management cycle ................................................................... 10 Figure 8: Population of communities in Contra Costa County ......................................... 14 Figure 9: Map of jurisdictions in Contra Costa County ..................................................... 15 Figure 10: Images of potential hazards............................................................................. 16 Figure 11: Examples of types of hazards .......................................................................... 17 Figure 12: Hazard probability and impact matrix from pg. 322 of the County LHMP ...... 18 Figure 13: Faultlines in Contra Costa County .................................................................... 19 Figure 14: SEMS management levels of response ............................................................ 26 Figure 15: SEMS Field and EOC functions ......................................................................... 27 Figure 16: Contra Costa County EOC Organizational Chart .............................................. 29 Figure 17: County emergency support functions table of roles and responsibilities ....... 32 Figure 18: ICS section responsibilities............................................................................... 34 Figure 19: EOC levels of activation ................................................................................... 36 Figure 20: EOC direction of control and coordination ...................................................... 37 Figure 21: Recovery support functions. See individual Recovery Support Function Appendices for additional information............................................................................. 40 v Introductory Elements These elements provide a record of plan development, approval, and maintenance. Preface This plan was developed and is maintained by the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services in collaboration with our emergency management partners. It facilitates preparation, response operations, and short-term recovery activity for emergencies. The plan includes guidelines supported by law, highlights emergency management best practices, and provides a scalable and flexible approach to different types of incidents that may affect Contra Costa County. However, this plan cannot anticipate all possible events and situations in an emergency response. Conditions will develop in operations where standard methods will not suffice. Nothing in this Plan shall be interpreted as an obstacle to the staff's experience, initiative, and ingenuity in overcoming the complexities under actual emergency conditions. 1 Letter of Promulgation This letter from the Contra Costa County (the County) Board of Supervisors serves as a dated resolution recognizing and adopting this document as the County all-hazards emergency operations plan (EOP). Approval Date: November 1, 2022 To: Community of Contra Costa County The preservation of life, property and the environment are an inherent responsibility of the local, state, and federal government. Contra Costa County, in cooperation with the cities, towns, special districts and partners in the county have prepared this emergency operations plan to ensure the most effective response to emergencies. This plan establishes the emergency organization, assigns tasks, specifies policies and general procedures, and provides for the coordination of planning efforts of the various emergency staff and service elements utilizing the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors gives its full support to this plan and urges all officials, employees, and the residents, individually and collectively, to do their share in the total emergency effort of Contra Costa County. The resolution adopting this plan supersedes prior plans. Contra Costa County recognizes the work by the many individuals and organizations that collaborated to revise the Contra Costa County Emergency Operations Plan. Through the coordinated efforts, this plan provides the framework for the best possible management of emergencies and assistance to the residents of Contra Costa County when disaster strikes. Chair, Board of Supervisors Figure 1: Letter of approval 2 Approval and Implementation This section introduces Contra Costa County (the County) Emergency Operations Plan (the Plan), describes how it applies to the County, and delegates authority for an emergency proclamation. Circumstances under which an emergency may be proclaimed are reviewed. The Plan will take effect upon the approval by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. The Plan will be officially adopted and promulgated. The Plan will be distributed to those county departments, supporting agencies, and community organizations assigned primary functions or responsibilities within Emergency Operations. Emergency Proclamations An emergency proclamation may serve multiple purposes depending on the incident and the affected entity. Being a prerequisite for a Governor or Presidential Declaration of emergency, an emergency proclamation: • Provides for multi-agency or multi-jurisdictional coordination in response to an event where County resources are insufficient • Provides for the use of emergency powers and expenditures • Offers legal protection for public employees serving as Disaster Service Workers and governing bodies engaged in the response • Allows for the issuance of orders and regulations to protect life and property (e.g., curfews) County Ordinance §42-2.802 clarifies the authority to proclaim an emergency. To the extent that the County Ordinance may conflict with the provisions of the State Emergency Services Act, §8558, the latter shall prevail. When the Board is not in session, the County Administrator has the authority to proclaim a local emergency after conferring, if possible, with one or more members of the Board, including the Board Chairperson. If a conference with the Board Chairperson is impossible, a proclamation in writing is required. Proclaiming authorities include: • The Board of Supervisors • Incorporated jurisdictions as provided under their municipal codes. o The jurisdiction shall advise the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff's Emergency Services Division of the proclamation. Health and Safety Code §101080 authorizes the County Health Officer to declare a local health emergency in, “situations involving the release or spillage of hazardous 3 medical waste if the hazard or medical waste spilled is determined to be an immediate threat to the public health, or whenever there is an imminent and proximate threat of the introduction of any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease, chemical agent, noncommunicable biologic agent, toxin, or radioactive agent, the director may declare a health emergen cy and the local health officer may declare a local health emergency in the jurisdiction or any area thereof affected by the threat to the public health.” When an emergency is proclaimed, the Contra Costa County Emergency Operations Plan serves as the framework for guiding response, led by the Administrator of Emergency Services (CAO), collaborating with the Director of OES or their designated alternates. Roles and Responsibilities The Director of the Office of Emergency Services (OES) or their designee oversees the County’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) (County Ordinance Code, Article 42-2.6). The Director assumes the ultimate responsibility for implementing the Plan, and directs the County’s emergency management organization, referred to as an Operational Area when there is an emergency. The Director of Emergency Services, as supported by the Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services, has responsibility for the following: • All phases of the emergency management cycle for the unincorporated areas of the County • Organizing, staffing, and operating the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) • Coordinating emergency communications and messaging to the public • Providing subject matter expertise and guidance to elected officials and other organizations • Maintaining information on the status of resources, services, and operations • Obtaining support for the Contra Costa County Operational Area and providing support to other jurisdictions as needed Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB) The Contra Costa County Emergency Services Policy Board (ESPB) is an advisory body to the County Administrator providing assistance and advice on emergency preparedness planning efforts and the coordination of such planning efforts throughout the county. The ESPB functions as the Contra Costa County Disaster Council. The ESPB reviews and makes recommendations on the following as necessary for plan and agreement implementation, Emergency Mutual Aid Plans and Agreements, Ordinances, Resolutions, and Regulations. The County Administrator serves as the chair, and the Sheriff serves as the vice-chair of the ESPB. 4 Operational Area Council (OAC) The Operational Area Council is created as an advisory council to the ESPB and is coordinated by the Sheriff’s Office, Office of Emergency Services. The Operational Area Council consists of emergency managers from incorporated cities, special districts, key utilities, businesses, and staff of the Sheriff’s Office, Office of Emergency Services. The OAC meets at least quarterly to discuss and consider countywide emergency management areas, issues, and to make recommendations to the ESPB through the Office of Emergency Services. OAC members may meet more frequently during an emergency operations center activation for increased situational awareness. These meetings may also be called Multi-Agency Coordination (MAC) meetings. 5 Plan Concurrence This section demonstrates concurrence among County Agencies and represents agreement with how the Plan assigns tasks among those agencies. It includes a distribution record and a history of changes made to the Plan. The following agencies represent the Emergency Services Policy Board of Contra Costa County and agree with how this plan describes their tasks. Figure 2: Emergency Services Policy Board record of concurrence Agency Signatory Contra Costa County Administrator’s Office Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff Contra Costa County Counsel Contra Costa County Health Services Contra Costa County Public Works Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Contra Costa County Risk Management Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools Contra Costa County Department of Information Technology Contra Costa County Public Manager’s Association 6 Record of Changes The following table documents the revisions made to this plan. This plan should be reviewed and updated annually. Figure 3: Record of revisions Revision Date Summary of Major Changes Revised Sections Revised By (Name and Organization) 7 Plan Distribution The following table documents when and to whom copies of the plan have been distributed. Figure 4: Record of distribution Date of Distribution Plan Version (Date of Plan) Method of Distribution (Email, Post on Server, Provide Hard Copy, etc.) Distributed To (Name and Department/Organization) 8 Plan Development and Maintenance This section explains why the plan was developed and how it is maintained and implemented. An overview of the planning process is provided. The County emergency management organization is described, and planning assumptions are listed. Contra Costa County’s emergency management organization brings together diverse stakeholders with varied roles and responsibilities throughout all stages of the emergency management cycle. County departments, incorporated jurisdictions, special districts, private- sector, and non-profit organizations together comprise the Contra Costa County Operational Area, under the direction of the County Administrator’s Office and the leadership of the Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services. This plan was developed to guide the County through all phases of the emergency management cycle by outlining underlying assumptions and providing a framework for interagency and inter- jurisdictional coordination. The document represents a single component of the emergency planning process, developed, maintained, and administered through the Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services as described in this document's Approval and Implementation section. The Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services is responsible for implementing revisions that keep this plan current. Revisions will be documented on the “Record of Changes” form in this plan. Contra Costa County takes a “whole community approach” to the development and maintenance of the Plan. Whole Community encompasses individuals, private and public sector partners, faith-based organizations, community groups, and all levels of government. Access & Functional Needs A Whole Community Approach The Whole Community includes individuals, including those who may have access or functional needs. The California Office of Emergency Services characterizes the following individuals as having access or functional needs: •Live in institutionalized settings •Are elderly or unaccompanied children •Are from diverse cultures •Have limited English proficiency or are non-English speaking •Are transportation or communication disadvantaged •Have no access to a shelter and/or may need to be assigned a Functional Access Service Team (FAST) member •Have disabilities – temporary or lifelong •Have sight or hearing impairments •May require medical care or supervision •Other situations that would ensure maintaining independence Figure 5: The whole community approach describing access and functional needs 9 Coordination with partners begins with this document and extends to all aspects of emergency management in Contra Costa County. Steps in the Planning Process The planning process below is flexible and adaptable. Considerations should be made at each step of the planning process regarding; training, exercises, equipment, and other requirements within the jurisdiction. Planning Assumptions Planning assumptions are generally accepted facts that allow the EOP to be executed with a shared understanding of what can happen in an emergency. The following assumptions were considered in the development of this Plan: • All incidents are local, may occur at any time with little or no warning, and may exceed the capabilities of local government. • Emergencies may cause casualties, fatalities, and population displacement. • An emergency can cause damage to property, critical infrastructure, the environment, and the economy. • An emergency may interrupt public and private sector services. • The more significant the complexity, impact, and geographic scope of an emergency, the more multiagency coordination will be required. • Mutual aid resources from outside the county may be required. • Events affecting the Bay Area region may affect the availability of needed response resources from outside Contra Costa County, including staff who work in Contra Costa living outside the County. Figure 6: Steps in the planning process Step 1: Form Collaborative Planning Team Step 2: Understand the Situation Step 3: Determine Goals & Objectives Step 4: Plan Development Step 5: Plan Preparation, Review, & Approval Step 6: Plan Implementation & Maintenance 10 • Contra Costa County’s Whole Community approach serves and integrates people with Access and Functional Needs. • This document will be utilized in coordination with applicable local, state, and federal contingency plans. • This plan does not supplant field incident command decisions or tactics in an emergency. Mitigation Hazard mitigation refers to action taken to lessen or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from different hazards to which they may be vulnerable. In addition to reducing the impact of a disaster, mitigation activities help to create safer communities by interrupting a cycle of repeated damage and reconstruction. Examples of mitigation activities include projects to reduce risk, increase the strength of critical infrastructure and identify and protect lifelines into communities. Preparedness Activities related to developing and improving response and recovery capabilities are part of a comprehensive preparedness program. Preparedness refers to a continuous cycle of planning, organizing, training, equipping, exercising, evaluating, and taking corrective action to ensure effective coordination during incident response. Examples of preparedness activities include establishing mutual aid agreements, developing plans, training EOC personnel, and public outreach and education. Within NIMS, preparedness focuses on the following elements: planning, procedures and protocols, training and exercises, personnel qualification and certification, and equipment certification. Figure 7: The emergency management cycle 11 Response Response activities are those elements undertaken when a disaster occurs or threatens to occur. Response activities include identifying goals and strategies, coordinating operations, public notification, public information, mutual aid, and planning during a disaster. Recovery Activities aimed at re-establishing normalcy within affected communities to restore the county to its pre-disaster condition are recovery activities. Examples of recovery activities may be short-term when they focus on stabilizing the situation, removing debris, restoring services, and re - establishing different community functions. Longer-term recovery activities grow out of short- term recovery. They include facility and infrastructure restoration, community planning and rebuilding assistance, and mitigation strategies into rebuilding efforts. 12 Purpose and Scope This section describes the purpose of the Plan and the scope of where it is applicable . The plan is considered active upon approval. The conditions under which an emergency may be proclaimed are described in the Approval and Implementation section. Purpose The Emergency Operations Plan is intended to: • Provide the basis for coordination during all phases of the emergency management cycle through an all-hazards, whole community approach. • Establish operational concepts and standard operating procedures associated with Emergency Operations Center (EOC) activities. • Describe the relationship between EOC activities and other emergency response agencies. • Establish the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS) within Contra Costa County. • Address the needs of people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs who may be disproportionately affected during and after an emergency. See California Government Code section 8593.3, which defines access and functional needs. Scope This Plan applies to all emergencies in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County when coordination is required between multiple organizations or county departments, or both. This plan also applies to emergencies within incorporated areas as requested by those jurisdictions. According to this document, county departments and special districts are responsible for carrying out emergency planning. Local jurisdictions are responsible for carrying out local emergency operations planning per the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). Local jurisdictions, special districts, and emergency response agencies outside the Office of Emergency Services are responsible for coordinating with the Office of Emergency Services for emergency plans and standard operating procedure integration. 13 Situation Overview This section provides an overview of the hazards and threats that may affect Contra Costa County. It summarizes the county’s locale, risks, and threats and justifies prioritizing emergency preparedness and planning efforts for specific hazards. History Contra Costa County was founded in 1850 as one of the original 27 counties of California . It is one of nine San Francisco Bay Area counties and is California’s ninth most populous county. Population According to the 2020 U.S. Census, Contra Costa County has 1,165,927 residents, of which more than 77 percent are over the age of 18. The census report shows that 178,527 of those residents live in unincorporated areas. Most of the county’s population resides along the urban corridors of state highways 4 and 24 and interstates 80 and 680. Local Setting Contra Costa County encompasses 804 square miles, of which 716 are land, and 88 are water. Contra Costa County’s physical geography is dominated by the bayside plain, the Oakland and Berkeley hills in the west, agricultural land, and the Delta waterways in the east. In between are several inland valleys and Mt. Diablo, which at an elevation of 3,849 feet, is the most notable natural landmark in the central county area. Parts of Contra Costa County are connected to neighboring counties by bridges; the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge in the northwest, the Carquinez Bridge in the north, the Antioch Bridge in the northeast, and the Middle River Bridge in the east. The Caldecott Tunnel in the west is another primary transportation connector to neighboring Alameda County. Martinez is the county seat and is in the northern central portion of the county. There are 19 incorporated jurisdictions in Contra Costa County and 34 unincorporated jurisdictions, divided among 5 (five) supervisorial districts. 14 Total County Population for Contra Costa County – 2020 Census Incorporated Jurisdictions & Population Estimate Unincorporated Jurisdictions & Population Estimate Antioch city 115,291 Acalanes Ridge 1,285 Brentwood city 64,292 Alamo 15,314 Clayton city 11,070 Alhambra Valley 805 Concord city 125,410 Bay Point 23,896 Danville town 43,582 Bayview 1,782 El Cerrito city 25,962 Bethel Island 2,131 Hercules city 26,016 Blackhawk 9,637 Lafayette city 25,391 Byron 1,140 Martinez city 37,287 Camino Tassajara 4,951 Moraga town 16,870 Castle Hill 1,271 Oakley city 43,357 Clyde 729 Orinda city 19,514 Contra Costa Centre 6,808 Pinole city 19,022 Crockett 3,242 Pittsburg city 76,416 Diablo 1,255 Pleasant Hill city 34,613 Discovery Bay 15,358 Richmond city 116,448 East Richmond Heights 3,460 San Pablo city 32,127 El Sobrante 15,524 San Ramon city 84,605 Kensington 5,428 Walnut Creek city 70,127 Knightsen 1,596 Total City 987,400 Montalvin Manor 3,099 For additional Census information, please go to: https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/5342/Demographics * Population-based on 2020 Decennial Census Results Mountain View 2,622 Norris Canyon 1,313 North Gate 667 North Richmond 4,175 Pacheco 4,183 Port Costa 190 Reliez Valley 3,354 Rodeo 9,653 Rollingwood 3,015 San Miguel 3,591 Saranap 5,830 Shell Ridge 1,014 Tara Hills 5,364 Vine Hill 4,323 Other Unincorporated 10,522 Total Unincorporated 178,527 Figure 8: Population table by jurisdiction 15 Figure 9: Map of jurisdictions in Contra Costa County 16 Hazards in Contra Costa County This section of the EOP consists of a series of threat summaries beginning with those threats identified in the Contra Costa County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. It describes the local area, risk factors, and the anticipated nature of situations, which could threaten or occur in the County. If future APPENDIX or hazard mitigation plan development results in a more current or robust hazard or threat analysis data, future EOP revisions will incorporate that data into this section. Hazards are not mutually exclusive, and one or more of these events may co -occur. Action accomplishments in response to hazards and hazard details are provided in this document's Appendices, separate from this Plan and department-specific Standard Operating Procedures. In 2018 Contra Costa County prepared a hazard mitigation plan in compliance with the Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA - DMA; Public Law 106-390) passed in 2000. This analysis aimed to identify and discuss the natural threats confronting Contra Costa County communities and the mitigation efforts. Figure 10: Images of potential hazards 17 Contra Costa County is vulnerable to a wide range of threats. An all-hazards threat perspective considers a complete range of threats including, but not limited to, natural hazards, technological and structural vulnerabilities, biological and man-made threats. Emergency planning should consider historical events and accommodate new planning assumptions as the County population grows and threats evolve. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan utilizes Hazards United States (HAZUS), a nationally applicable standardized methodology containing models and other specific disaster data, to estimate potential losses from earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, and hurricanes. Probability and Impact The criteria below were used to evaluate hazards and identify the highest risk hazard in Contra Costa County. The probability of occurrence of a hazard is based on the likelihood of an annual occurrence. The possibility of annual occurrence is assessed using past hazard events in the area and the potential for changes in the frequency of these events due to climate change. Hazard impact is assessed based on effects on people, property, and the local economy. The following chart assigns the value based on the total population exposed to the hazard event. Natural•Earthquakes •Landslide •Wildfire •Severe Weather •Drought •Tsunami •Sea Level Rise Technological & Structural•Dam Failure •Levee Failure •Power Failure •Radiological or other hazardous substance release Biological•Airborne pathogens such as COVID-19, influenza, tuberculosis, or menengitis •Foodborne illnesse due to contaminates such as salmonella, E. coli, or botulism Man-Made•Arson •Active shooter •Terrost acts •Cyber attacks •Other criminal threats or acts that affect groups or populations Figure 11: Examples of types of hazards 18 Probability Impact High – Hazard event is likely to occur within 25 years High – 25 percent or more of the population is exposed to the hazard Medium – Hazard event likely to occur within 100 years Medium – 10 percent to 25 percent of the population is exposed to the hazard Low – Hazard event not likely to occur within 100 years Low – 10 percent or less of the population is exposed to the hazard Impact Low Medium High Probability High Drought Flood Landslide Severe Weather Wildfire Earthquake Medium Sea Level Rise Tsunami Dam & Levee Failure Low Figure 12: Hazard probability and impact matrix from pg. 322 of the County LHMP 19 Earthquake Earthquakes are unpredictable. They vary significantly in size and intensity and can cause devastation. Although infrequent, significant earthquakes have tremendous potential for loss of life, property damage, and the environment. Major fault lines that could potentially impact Contra Costa County and surrounding counties include: • The Hayward Fault, which runs along the west end of the County • The Rogers Creek Fault is in the north-central area of the County and runs under the Buchanan Airport • The Concord Green Valley Fault, which is in the east end of the County • The Mount Diablo Thrust Fault, along the southwest perimeter of Mount Diablo • The Greenville Fault in the east end of the County and under several of the levee protected islands • The Calaveras Fault runs through the south-central corridor near the I-680 Freeway • The San Andreas Fault is west of Contra Costa County Critical petrochemical businesses located along the industrial corridor and other essential facilities in the County can create additional hazards if severely damaged during a large earthquake. Figure 13: Faultline’s in Contra Costa County 20 Landslide The U.S. Geological Survey definition of landslides includes many ground movements, such as rockfalls, profound failure of slopes, and shallow debris flows. Although gravity acting on an over-steepened pitch is the primary reason for a landslide, other contributing facto rs exist. Landslides commonly occur with other major natural disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, and floods. However, average seasonal rainfall, erosion, and occasionally wildlife may also contribute to landslide events. Landslides have occurred in conjunction with heavy rain events in Contra Costa County. There are no records of fatalities attributed to mass ground movement in the county. However, deaths have occurred across the west coast because of landslides and slope collapses. Severe Weather Severe weather refers to any dangerous meteorological phenomena that can cause damage, severe social disruption, or loss of human life. It includes thunderstorms, downbursts, tornadoes, waterspouts, snowstorms, ice storms, and dust storms. It is important to note that when “severe weather” is used, it refers to many sub-hazards in aggregate. Severe weather refers to dangerous conditions such as extreme hot or cold temperatures, high winds, or excessive rainfall. All weather-related emergencies can cause damage, severe social disruption, or loss of human life, especially amongst those experiencing homelessness, those considered medically fragile, and the elderly population. Wildland Fire The combination of highly flammable fuel, long dry summers, and steep slopes create a significant natural hazard of large wildland fires in many areas of Contra Costa County. A wildland fire is a fire whose primary fuel is natural vegetation. Wildland fires can consume thousands of acres of vegetation, timber, and agricultural lands. Fires ignited in wildland areas can quickly spread to places where residential or commercial structures intermingle with wildland vegetation. Similarly, fires that start in urbanized areas can grow into wildland fires. The pronounced Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) significantly increases fire hazards in populations with high structure densities adjacent to undeveloped open space areas with narrow roads and dense vegetation. WUI fires may result in death, injury, economic loss, and a significant public investment in firefighting activities. July through November have the greatest potential for wildland fires as vegetation dries out, humidity levels fall, and offshore winds blow. Weather, topography, and fuel are the top three factors that affect wildland fire behavior. Such fires expose residential and other development within the County to an increased risk of conflagration or extensive fire, which destroys a great deal of land or property. 21 Dam Failure Although rare, dam failures can cause sudden and catastrophic flooding in communities downstream, leading to injury, loss of life, and significant property damage. Some of the primary causes of a dam's collapse and structural failure include severe storms, earthquakes, internal erosion of piping, and foundation leakage. According to the 2013 State of California Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, there have been nine failed Federally regulated dams in the state since 1950, none of them in Contra Costa County. The most likely disaster-related causes of dam failure in Contra Costa County are earthquakes, excessive rainfall, and landslides. Levee Failure Two types of levees are present in the San Joaquin -Sacramento River Delta area of Contra Costa County: • Project levees are part of an authorized federal flood control project on the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta system. These levees deliver irrigation and drinking water. The County maintains over 385 miles of project levees built to the highest level of flood protection standards and inspected by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. • All other levees in the Delta are "non-project" or "local" levels. These levees, totaling 730 miles in length, are maintained by local reclamation districts. Levees are considered manufactured structures, usually earthen embankments, and are constructed to contain, control, or divert a water flow to protect the land from peak flood levels or to protect land below sea level. The most severe flood hazard in Contra Costa County relates to the system of levees that protect the islands and adjacent mainland in the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta area in eastern Contra Costa. Flood Flooding poses a severe risk to life, property, the environment, public health and safety, and the economic impact of affected areas. The majority of the County's creeks and shoreline areas are within the 100-year flood plain. During heavy rainstorms, water levels can rise quickly, especially in small streams and near the headwaters of river basins. Flash floods can begin before the rain stops falling. The most severe flood hazard in Contra Costa County relates to levees that protect the islands and adjacent mainland in the San Joaquin -Sacramento River Delta area in eastern Contra Costa County. Levees are subject to failure without warning; however, the threat increases during an earthquake or severe flooding . 22 Sea Level Rise Sea level rise is caused primarily by two factors related to global warming: the added water from melting ice sheets and glaciers and the expansion of seawater as it warms. Sea level rise will cause currently dry areas to be permanently or chronically inundated. Temporary inundation from extreme tide events and storm surges also will change. Unlike many other impacts resulting from climate change, sea-level rise will have a defined extent and location. Although the magnitude and timing of sea-level rise are uncertain, assessing potential areas at risk provides information appropriate for planning purposes . Tsunami A tsunami is a wave, or series of waves, generated by an earthquake, landslide, volcanic eruption, or even a giant meteor hitting the ocean. What typically happens is that a sizeable sub-marine earthquake creates an upward movement of the seafloor, lifting the overlying seawater. This uplifted water then falls and radiates away from this center in all directions as a tsunami. A tsunami can travel across the open ocean at about 500-miles per hour. As the wave approaches land, the ocean shallows, slowing down to about 30 miles per hour and growing significantly in height. While damaging tsunamis have occurred infrequently in California, they are a possibility that our coastal communities must consider. The most likely site of tsunami impacts in Contra Costa County is along San Pablo Bay. Drought The National Integrated Drought Information System characterizes drought as “a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period (usually a season or more), resulting in a water shortage.” Multi-year droughts may result in water shortages, impacting water available for human consumption and agriculture production within the Coun ty. Drought is a gradual phenomenon that often takes several consecutive winters with less than average precipitation to produce a significant impact. Drought creates a complex web of environmental and economic effects that spans many sectors. Drought imp acts include a reduction in food crops, increased livestock and wildlife mortality rates, increased fire hazards, and decreased water levels, leading to rationing. The consequences of these impacts illustrate indirect effects. For example, a reduction in crops, rangeland, and forest productivity may result in reduced income for farmers and agribusiness, increased prices for food and timber, unemployment, reduced tax revenues, and an increase in crime. Drought cycles typically occur every 7‐11 years. During periods of drought, emergency response measures will consist of land use planning practices consistent with water conservation goals and various water conservation measures. 23 Pandemic A pandemic is an epidemic of an infectious disease that has spread across a large region, for instance multiple continents or worldwide. Past viral pandemics have gravely impacted economic systems, and overwhelmed health care systems. Pandemics are unlike other public health emergencies or community disasters in that: • There may be a minimal warning. Most experts believe that we will have between one and six months before identifying a novel virus strain and the time that outbreaks begin to occur in the U.S. • Simultaneous outbreaks have a high probability of occurring throughout much of our Country, preventing sharing of human and material resources that generally occur with other natural disasters. • The effect of the particular virus on individual communities will be relatively prolonged– weeks to months–compared to minutes to hours observed in most other natural disasters. • Effective preventive and therapeutic measures will likely be in short supply. Widespread illness in the community will also increase the likelihood of sudden and significant personnel shortages in sectors that provide critical community services: healthcare workers, military personnel, police, emergency medical technicians and paramedics, firefighters, utility workers, child-care providers, and transportation workers are especially vulnerable. Capability Assessment A capability assessment provides part of the foundation for determining emergency management, preparedness, and mitigation strategy. The assessment process also identifies gaps or weaknesses that may need to be addressed through preparedness planning goals and practical actions considering the jurisdiction’s capabilities to implement them. Finally, the capability assessment highlights the positive measures that are in place or underway for continued support and enhancement of the jurisdiction’s preparedness and response efforts. Contra Costa County has implemented many capabilities to prepare for, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of an emergency or disaster. In addition to the county, cities, and towns within the county maintain local response capabilities and mutual aid agreements to assist when resources are exhausted. As outlined in the County Ordinance Code §42-2.204, Contra Costa County has committed to: 24 • The preparation and effectuation of plans to protect persons and property in this county in emergencies. • The creation, direction, and operation of the county emergency organization. • The coordination of the county’s emergency services and functions with those of other public and private entities, organizations, and persons. (Contra Costa County Ords. 82- 55 §1, 72-83) Mitigation Overview Many jurisdictions have taken mitigation measures to minimize the impact likely to result from the hazards. Contra Costa County’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies mitigation efforts to reduce the likelihood that a defined hazard will impact our communities . As the cost of damage from disasters increases, the County recognizes the importance of identifying effective ways to reduce vulnerability to disastrous events. 25 PART I: BASIC PLAN Concept of Operations This section explains the County’s intent during the response phase of the emergency management cycle concerning emergency operations. It outlines the guiding frameworks within which emergency management operations are carried out and assists in reviewing operational priorities. Local jurisdictions are responsible for protecting life, property, the environment, and restoration of services. This is achieved through the Emergency Management Cycle: Disasters do not appear one day – they exist throughout time and have a life cycle of occurrence . A series of management phases match this cycle: establish strategies to mitigate hazards, prepare for and respond to emergencies, and recover from effects. The OES staff and EOC staff routinely monitor events and the environment to identify specific threats that may affect the operational area. The increase in the awareness level of emergency personnel and the community improves operational readiness when a threat is approaching o r imminent. Ongoing awareness allows operational area response agencies to enhance leadership decision- making. Examples of readiness and response efforts include: • Testing tools, such as the Community Warning System. • Reviewing plans, procedures, and resource checklists. • Preparing and disseminating information to the community. • Briefing government officials. • Activating emergency operations centers or department operations centers . Incident goals govern resource allocation and the response strategies for the County and its local jurisdictions during an emergency. Below is a list of operational priorities: • Save Lives – The preservation of life is the top priority of emergency managers and first responders and takes precedence over all other considerations. • Protect Property – Efforts must be made to protect public and private property and resources, including critical infrastructure, from damage during and after an emergency. • Preserve the Environment – Efforts must be made to preserve Contra Costa County’s environment and protect it from damage during an emergency. 26 • Restore Essential Services – Power, water, sanitation, communication, transportation, and other essential services must be restored as rapidly as possible to assist the community in returning to normal daily activities. Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Coordination Levels The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) is required by Government Code Section 8607(a) to manage emergencies involving multiple jurisdictions and agencies. SEMS consists of five organizational sections (management, plans/intelligence, operations, logistics, and finance/administration). These sections aid coordination and communication between the five levels of the system (State, Regional, Operational Area, Local, and Field). SEMS incorporates the Incident Command System (ICS), the Master Mutual Aid Agreement (MMAA), existing mutual aid systems, the operational area concept, and multi-agency or inter- agency coordination. Local governments must use SEMS to be eligible for funding of their response-related costs under state disaster assistance programs. •Manages State resources to meet emergency needs of other levels •Coordinates mutual aid among regions and between regional and state levels •Serves as the communication link between the State and Federal response system State Level •Manages and coordinates resources among operatonal areas •Coordinates information sharing between operational areas and the State level •Oversees State support for emergency response Regional Level •Encompasses the county and all political subdivisions in the county, including special districts •Manages and coordinates information, resources, and priorities among local governments •Serves as the coordination and communication link between local and regional levels Operational Area •Includes cities, counties, and special districts •Manages and coordinates overall emergency response and recovery activities in their jurisdiction Local Government •Emergency responders carry out tactical decisions and activities in the direct response to a threat •Requires the use of Incident Command System (ICS) Field Response Figure 14: SEMS management levels of response 27 In compliance with the SEMS Regulations, the County has EOC staff to manage emergency responses within the County’s jurisdiction. The EOC Director in collaboration with department heads and OES staff requests team members, as needed, to the County EOC to carry out their duties. The Contra Costa County EOC staff is responsible for coordinating resources, strategies, and policy for any event in the Operational Area (OA) that exceeds the capabilities of first responders. Tactical control remains the responsibility of field Incident Commanders (ICs) at all times. SEMS is intended to: • Facilitate the flow of information within and between levels of the system • Facilitate coordination and communication among all responding agencies • Improve the mobilization, deployment, utilization, tracking, and demobilization of mutual aid resources. SEMS Field and EOC Functions and how they relate are further illustrated in the following chart: Figure 15: SEMS Field and EOC functions 28 Incident Command System (ICS) and National Incident Management System (NIMS) The Incident Command System (ICS) is used for the command, control, and coordination of emergency response. ICS incorporates personnel, policies, procedures, facilities, and equipment, integrated into a common organizational structure designed to improve emergency response operations of all types and complexities. A few characteristics of ICS include: • Span of control – one supervisor for every 3 to 7 staff members • Personal accountability – identifying roles and responsibilities • Common terminology – a language shared among agencies and jurisdictions • Resource management – coordinated distribution of resources based on priorities • Integrated communications – ensuring communication systems are interoperable • First responders – tactical control remains the responsibility of field Incident Commanders at all times The National Incident Management System (NIMS) is a comprehensive, national approach to incident management applicable at all jurisdictional levels and across functional disciplines. It is intended to: • Be applicable across a full spectrum of potential incidents, hazards, and impacts, regardless of size, location, or complexity. • Improve coordination and cooperation between public and private entities in various incident management activities. • Provide a common standard for overall incident management. California Emergency Support Functions The California Emergency Support Functions (CA-ESFs) are a grouping of functions with activities and responsibilities, which lend themselves to improving the state’s ability to prepare for, effectively mitigate, cohesively and collaboratively respond to, and rapidly recover from any emergency. CA-ESFs unify a broad spectrum of stakeholders with various capabilities, resources, and authorities to improve coordination for a discipline . The County’s emergency management organization follows the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) structure and principles, including organization around Emergency Support Functions (ESFs). The County also follows the Federal Incident Command System (ICS). 29 The daily planning process brings together partners and stakeholders through a whole community approach under the ESF structure. During an emergency, the ESF format is incorporated into an ICS response structure following SEMS. Figure 16: Contra Costa County EOC Organizational Chart 30 Contra Costa County uses CA-ESFs as a guide in local planning efforts. Each function is led by a County department and supported by stakeholders who work within the scope of that function . These include special districts, private, and non-profit organizations. Together, these ESFs are responsible for developing functional plans and documentation. The following table illustrates the CA-ESF’s and the appropriate county department leads: Emergency Support Function (ESF) County Lead Description ESF #1 Transportation County Department of Public Works Manages Contra Costa County transportation systems & infrastructure, including roads, bridges, railways, aviation, and marine. Department of Conservation & Development Further scope includes identifying movement restrictions as well as damage and impact assessment. ESF #2 Communications County Department of Information Technology Provides resources, coordination, support, and restoration of Contra Costa County voice and data communications, including emergency communications. County Office of Emergency Services, Community Warning System ESF #3 Construction & Engineering County Department of Public Works Provides technical advice, evaluation, management, and inspection of critical infrastructure. ESF #4 Fire & Rescue Contra Costa Fire Protection District Coordinates and supports wildfire, rural and urban fire detection, and suppression. Lends expertise and support in emergency scene rescue (ground urban and rural search operations) activities by providing personnel, equipment, and supplies. Urban Search and Rescue *Formerly ESF #9 ESF #5 Management County Office of Emergency Services Supports communicates and coordinates the collection, analysis, and processing of information, ensures EOC readiness. County Administrator’s Office 31 ESF #6 Care & Shelter County Employment and Human Services Coordinates and organizes disaster housing, emergency food assistance, minor medical care, and family reunification of displaced survivors. ESF #7 Resources County Department of Public Works Coordinates and plans activities to locate, procure, and pre-position logistical support such as space, personnel, equipment, and supplies. ESF #8 Public Health & Medical County Department of Health Services Responds to infectious disease outbreaks, human- caused bioterrorism events, and health consequences resulting from a disaster. Oversees the restoration of medical facilities and associated healthcare services. Coordinates and deploys Disaster Healthcare Volunteers including Medical Reserve Corp. Coordinates all medical and behavioral health programs and their mutual aid. ESF #10 Hazardous Materials County Department of Health Services, HazMat Division Provides a coordinated response to actual or potential discharge and release of oil, chemical, biological, radiological, or other hazardous substances in the County. ESF #11 Food & Agriculture County Department of Agriculture Performs animal, plant disease, and pest response. Provides food safety and security and protection and restoration of natural and cultural resources and historic properties. Manages weights and measures regulations. ESF #12 Utilities County Department of Public Works Provides assessment and restoration of gas, electric, water, wastewater, and telecommunications to include energy industry coordination and forecast. ESF #13 Law Enforcement County Sheriff’s Office Provides for public safety and security of property, coordinates coroner activities, and supports access, traffic, and crowd control. 32 Includes enforcement of state and local laws as well as some Search and Rescue responsibility in addition to evacuation operations. Evacuation *Formerly ESF #16 Wilderness Search & Rescue *Formerly ESF #9 ESF #14 Long-Term Recovery County Administrator’s Office Performs social and economic community impact assessment and analysis and review of mitigation program implementation. Recovery Plan to be developed utilizing the six FEMA Recovery Support Functions: • Community Planning and Capacity Building • Economic • Health and Social Services • Housing • Infrastructure Systems • Natural and Cultural Resources EF #15 Public Information County Administrator’s Office Supports the accurate, coordinated, timely, and accessible release of information to affected audiences. Performs media and community relations while operating within a Joint Information System/Center. ESF #17 Volunteer & Donations Management County Public Works Coordinates the services of affiliated volunteers, non- profit organizations and manages spontaneous volunteers. Contains monetary and in-kind donated goods. County Human Resources Office ESF #18 Cybersecurity County Department of Information Technology Responsible for re-establishing a stable, safe, and resilient cyberspace and the protection of secure cyber network. Figure 17: County emergency support functions table of roles and responsibilities 33 Emergency Operations Center Organization This section describes the organizational structure of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Communications and coordination between the EOC and with operational area partner s are outlined. The ways that the EOC coordinates resources and facilitates information sharing among active area partners are described. Incidents begin locally at the field level. Field personnel activate different organizational components as incidents grow in complexity. Field offices, departments, department operations centers (DOCs), and emergency operations centers (EOCs) activate in support of the field operations. These principles adhere to the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) process. Local jurisdictions activate their EOCs based on the need for greater coordination in an emergency. When activated, local EOCs help form a common operating picture of the incident by collecting, analyzing, disseminating emergency information, and supporting field operations through resource coordination. Local EOCs may activate in support of local departmental operations centers (DOCs). Local EOCs may be established by cities, towns, and special districts. This hybrid ICS and SEMS organizational chart describes the involvement of special districts, private and non-profit agencies. Further explanation of the roles played by these groups within the County Emergency Management Organization is provided in the ESF chart on pages 30-32. Field/ EOC Communications and Coordination The Field and EOC Communication and Coordination are further illustrated in the following chart: ICS Section Functions Command/Field Management/EOC • Overall EOC management • Public information: provides for public safety communications • Identification of a media center • Rumor control and management of public inquiries • Identification of a Safety Officer • Facility security • Agency liaison • State/Federal field activity coordination Operations • General warning • Special population warning • Authority to activate Emergency Alert System(s) • Evacuation, including inmates, unique populations • Traffic direction and control • Debris removal 34 • Evacuation and care for pets and livestock • Access control of evacuated areas • Hazardous materials management • Coroner operations • Emergency medical care • Transportation management • Crisis counseling for emergency responders • Urban search and rescue • Disease prevention and control • Utility restoration • Flood operations • Initial damage assessments • Safety assessments • Shelter and feeding operations • Emergency food and water distribution Planning and Intelligence • Situation Status • Situation Analysis • Information display • Documentation • Advance Planning • Technical Specialist • EOC Action Planning • Demobilization Logistics • Field incident support • Communications support • Transportation support • Personnel • Supply and procurement • Resource tracking • Sanitation services • Computer support Finance and Administration • Fiscal management • Timekeeping • Purchasing • Compensation and claims • Cost recovery • Travel requests, forms, and claims Figure 18: ICS section responsibilities Primary and Alternate EOC OES designates the location of the Emergency Operation Center. The primary site is at the Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff Administration building at 1850 Muir R oad in the City of Martinez. Additional EOC space is available at the exact location. In the case of an inoperable primary EOC, an alternate EOC may be identified and established based on the site, size, and scope of an 35 incident. Day-to-day functions will be maintained in the most appropriate government facility available with involvement from other organizations, special districts, private and nonprofit entities. Response, Resource Coordination, and Mutual Aid During the response phase, emphasis is placed on saving lives, protecting property and the environment, and restoring services to minimize the effects of the disaster. Below are key actions to be taken: • Alert and Notification - Local response agencies are alerted about an incident. Notifications go out to first responders as well as the public. • Mobilization - As an incident escalates and expands, additional resources are activated by the Operational Area and mobilized to support the response. This includes resources from within the county or, when resources are exhausted, from surrounding jurisdictions through mutual aid agreements. • Resource Coordination - The Contra Costa County EOC staff will coordinate resource requests from the local municipalities within the Operational Area (OA). If demands exceed the supply in the OA, the Operations Section will provide resources based on established Operational Area priorities. If resources are not available within the OA, requests will be made according to SEMS. • Mutual Aid – Under California’s Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement (MMAA), statewide emergency assistance is provided voluntarily from one jurisdiction to another at no cost to the receiving jurisdiction. Mutual aid ensures that adequate resources, facilities, and other emergency support are provided to jurisdictions whenever their resources prove inadequate to cope with a given situation. • Documentation - Documentation is the key to recovering eligible emergency response and recovery costs. Damage assessment documentation is critical in establishing eligibility for disaster assistance programs. Responsibility for maintaining Emergency Operations Center records rests with the entire Contra Costa County EOC staff. Operational Area (OA) EOC Activation The purpose of the OA EOC is to acquire and coordinate resources within the Operational Area as requested by field operations, DOCs, or local EOCs. This may involve coordinating resources from one local jurisdiction to another or coordinating resources from other operational areas, the state, or the federal government. The Operational Area EOC may also activate to coordinate the deployment of resources to other operational areas. 36 The County EOC operates at different levels depending on the requirements of an incident : Department Operation Center Activation Departments within jurisdictions may activate DOCs based on the needs of field operations during a disaster. Their primary function is to coordinate and control actions specific to that department during an emergency event. DOCs may activate in conjunction with EOCs or may activate independently. EOC Reporting System Contra Costa County currently has a web -based crisis management reporting system (Web EOC) during emergencies. Web EOC aims to improve the county’s ability to respond to major disasters. The county’s Web EOC includes all incorporated jurisdictions and special districts in the Operational Area (OA). Web EOC assists in increasing the level of service and efficiency by improving the county’s ability to respond to, manage, coordinate requests for resources, and disseminate information throughout the emergency management process during a disaster. Level 3 Activation Active Monitoring Incident is managed by available local or departmental resources •EOC staff positions support the incident by activly monitoring through situational awareness •Communications will be established with all participating agencies •Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is not required Level 2 Activation Partial Activation Incident extends beyond the capabilities of local resources •EOC staff may report to EOC •Liasions may be assigned to local EOC's or DOC's •EAP may be required •Coordination and resource mobilization may occur in support of local jurisdictions and county departments •Communications will be established with all participating agencies Level 1 Activation Full Activation Incident may involve regional, state, or federal resources •EOC staff positions are activated •EAP is required •Coordination, resource mobilization and prioritization, will occur in support of local jurisdictions and county departments •Communications will be established with all participating agencies Figure 19: EOC levels of activation 37 Field Coordination with Department Operations Centers and EOCs Field units communicate their operational needs to their organization or department, DOC or EOC. By liaising with other operational levels, a common operating picture is created. Figure 20: EOC direction of control and coordination DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS CENTERS 38 Continuity of Government Provisions for continuity of government and the retention of vital records are outlined in this section. Threats to Contra Costa County have a single common ality: the interruption of one or more critical government functions vital to the public's health, safety, or welfare. The fundamental mission of Contra Costa County is the reliability of service, particularly in times of emergency. Public trust is based on the delivery of vital government services. Planning authority is accomplished by preparing for a succession of officers, designation of standby officers, administration of oaths of office, and continuation of duties of the governing body. See the county continuity of government and department continuity of operations plans for additional information. Vital Records Retention In Contra Costa County, the County Recorder is responsible for preserving vital statistics. Vital statistics are defined as those records that are essential to: • Protect and preserve the rights and interests of individuals, governments, corporations , and other entities. Examples include vital statistics, land and tax records, license registers, and articles of incorporation. • Conduct emergency response and recovery operations. Records of this type include utility system maps, emergency supplies, equipment locations, emergency operations plans and procedures, personnel rosters, etc. • Re-establish normal governmental functions and protect the rights and interests of government: constitutions and charters, statutes and ordinances, court records, of ficial proceedings, and financial records. Contra Costa County's vital records are routinely stored in the County Recorder's Office. Electronic and computerized data is backed up nightly by an off-site vendor specializing in data protection and recovery. Microfilmed records and other backup data are stored in an off-site vault with a vendor specializing in information protection and recovery. Contra Costa's birth and death records are managed and maintained by the Vital Registration Department in Public Health. This information is coordinated with the Coroner's Office. Each department within the county will identify, maintain, and protect its vital records. Protection includes but is not limited to archival preservation, offsite storage, and maintaining redundant 39 backup copies. Recovery Overview Recovery refers to re-establishing a new state of normalcy in the affected areas of the county. The transition from response operations to recovery is a gradual shift to assisting individuals, households, businesses, and governments in meeting basic needs and returning to self-sufficiency. Recovery operations begin concurrently with or shortly after the commencement of response operations. Short-term recovery activities intended to return vital life-support systems to operation begin with restoring services after stabilizing the situation. Long-term recovery focuses on rebuilding the community as outlined in the National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF) and the California Disaster Recovery Framework (CDRF). Modeled after the NDRF, the CDRF guides federal, state, local, private, community-based organizations, and other nonprofit entities in effectively supporting disaster impacted jurisdictions to address gaps and rebuild resiliently. Recovery activities are categorized by the NDRF/CDRF designated Recovery Support Functions as follows: Recovery Support Function Description Example Responsibility Community Planning and Capacity Building Develops resources and tools to support partner agencies for managing and implementing recovery post- disaster. Enact zoning variances County Administrator’s Office Economic The ability to return business activities and develop new opportunities that result in a sustainable, viable community. Identify temporary business space, provide access to financial assistance where needed, assist in placement for housing County Administrator’s Office Health & Social Services Support program development which addresses public health, health care facilities, coalitions, and essential community needs especially at-risk children and vulnerable children, Activate local assistance centers County Health Services Department 40 individuals, and families affected by the disaster. Housing Coordinates and facilitates the delivery of resources to implement adequate, affordable, and accessible solutions that effectively support the whole community’s needs and contribute to resilience. Needs assessments, identify solutions and support required County Health Services Department Employment & Human Services Department Infrastructure Systems Efficiently facilitates scalable and collaborative restoration of services and protects from future hazards. Damage assessment, debris removal, open transportation routes, issue permits, restore power, water, sewer, and communications, and initiate temporary repairs Department of Public Works Department of Conservation and Development Natural & Cultural Resources Facilitates the integration of capabilities to support the protection of historic properties through recovery actions to preserve, conserve, rehabilitate, and restoration consistent with community priorities and in compliance with applicable environmental and historic preservation laws and Executive orders. Coordinate program assistance for farmers and ranchers Department of Agriculture Figure 21: Recovery support functions. See individual Recovery Support Function Appendices for additional information. Damage Assessment A jurisdiction’s Initial Damage Estimate (IDE) estimates the severity and extent of the damage caused by the emergency. The Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA) determines if an incident is beyond the capabilities of the affected jurisdiction requiring both State and Federal assistance. Documentation Within the Planning and Intelligence Section, this functional unit is responsible for collecting, distributing, recording, and safeguarding all documents relevant to an incident or within an EOC . The Finance and Administration Section obtains the appropriate information to compile required reimbursement applications. 41 After Action Reporting The After-Action Report (AAR) will serve as a source for documenting the County or local jurisdictions' successes and areas needing improvement. Additionally, the AAR will effectively identify resource gaps. County OES staff will assist in coordinating with appropriate operational area jurisdictions in compiling an AAR after any emergency. All EOC staff are responsible for participating in the AAR process. AARs lead to improvement plans and contain corrective actions that are continually monitored and implemented to improve readiness. All After Action Review documents for real life incidents are submitted to Cal OES via CALEOC, CAL OES’s web platform. 42 PART II: SUPPORTING ELEMENTS The supporting elements are variations of functional components tailored to the Plan. While the basic plan provides broad overarching information relevant to the Plan, these supporting elements focus on specific areas requiring an emergency operation focus. Supporting Elements include both Authorities and Appendices to the EOP. Appendices may include additional critical operational functions, including Emergency Response strategies that apply to a specific hazard. Appendices include a glossary, references, definitions, and any supporting documentation. 43 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Integrating People with Disabilities and with Access and Functional Needs Contra Costa County takes a whole community approach to serve the needs of the residents. This is accomplished by engaging critical stakeholders with expertise in transportation and sheltering. Populations with access and functional needs include community members who may have additional requirements before, during, and after an incident in functional areas. Individuals in need of additional response assistance may include those who: • Live in institutionalized settings • Are elderly • Are unaccompanied children • Are from diverse cultures • Have limited English proficiency or are non-English speaking • Are transportation disadvantaged • Have no access to communication devices • Have no access to a shelter • Have temporary and lifelong disabilities • Have sight or hearing impairments • Require medical care and supervision • Other situations that would ensure maintaining independence Lessons learned from recent emergencies concerning people with disabilities and other access and functional needs have shown that the existing concepts of emergency planning, implementation , and response must meet the needs of these groups during an emergency. These lessons show four areas that are repeatedly identified as most important to people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs: • Communications/Warning (See Appendix B: Alert and Warning) • Sheltering • Evacuation/Transportation • Recovery Essential facilities such as shelters, those facilities utilized during evacuations and movement of the population, and alert and warning tools accommodate the Americans with Disabilities Act . 44 Appendix B: Alert and Warning The County’s Community Warning System (CWS) may provide time-sensitive alerts and warnings to affected members of the public about imminent hazards to human life or health for which specific protective action is recommended. These alerts and warnings include hazardous material incidents, public health emergencies, law enforcement emergencies, fires threatening populated areas, severe flooding, or “at-risk” missing persons. The most common protective actions for these types of hazards are shelter in place/lockdown, evacuation/prepare to evacuate, or be-on-the- lookout. The Community Warning System automatically coordinates the transmission of alerts and warnings over a variety of delivery systems, including: • Sirens near major industrial facilities and in other special safety zones • Telephone Emergency Notification System (TENS) that includes both landlines (Reverse 911) throughout the county, and pre-registered mobile devices (cell phones, text, and email messages) • CWS website and social media, including Facebook and Twitter • California’s Emergency Digital Information System (EDIS) • Federal Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) ▪ Emergency Alert System (EAS) ▪ NOAA weather radios ▪ Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) The Community Warning System has predesigned templates for various warning messages to expedite the message development process. Although templates exist for many of the hazards common in Contra Costa County, it is essential to remember that all messages should include: • What authority is issuing the warning • What the hazard is • A specific affected area for which the warning is in effect • Who, specifically, is affected by this warning and what protective action they should take • How long the warning is in effect/when it expires 45 Appendix C: Population Protection Evacuations and “shelter-in-place” orders will be handled according to the Office of the Sheriff's Policies and Procedures, with the Incident Commander balancing the immediate hazards associated with remaining on the scene against the risks of moving people in a dangerous environment. • The Incident Commander or other authority will recommend a protective action based on discussion with the appropriate personnel regarding the nature of the incident. • The Incident Commander has the authority to initiate an evacuation or a shelter-in- place order based upon their assessment of the situation. • Area resources and, when available, additional resources, including personnel, transport, etc., may assist with the evacuation effort to provide security and facilitate an organized transition to a safe environment. • Early/Advanced evacuations will generally be conducted by available law enforcement working in the affected area. • Unaccompanied minors will be evacuated to a safe, contained location and supervised by a responsible adult/official until reunited with their parents. • Parents will be directed to the evacuation location to pick up children. • Area resources and, when available, additional resources may be allocated to provide temporary security to at-risk groups when a credible threat to safety exists. • Detention facility transportation units will move incarcerated individuals to pre- determined, secure locations in the event of an evacuation. • The Community Warning System may notify the public about existing hazards and protective actions. • At the request of the Incident Commander, by policies and procedures. The Community Warning System can be used to notify the public at the end of a shelter-in-place action. • Animal Control Services coordinates the care and shelter of evacuees’ pets considering American Red Cross shelters’ location(s). • California State Law does not provide language to support mandatory evacuations . Residents have the right to make independent decisions about evacuation. 46 Appendix D: Prevention and Protection Prevention Activities The Sheriff’s Office of Homeland Security Unit (HSU) is responsible for developing and maintaining positive partnerships between the Sheriff’s Office, its infrastructure partners, and other local, state, and federal agencies to share critical information to safeguard persons and property. HSU reviews tips and leads to ensure appropriate agencies and resources are notified. Protection Activities The Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC) position serves within the terrorism liaison officer outreach program. This position also directly links to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) and other state and federal agencies, facilitating information dissemination. Eight Signs of Terrorism Information gathering by suspicious persons Tests of security by suspicious persons Suspicious financial activity Acquiring supplies in preparation for an attack Suspicious persons out of place Dry or trial run to test infrastructure vulnerabilities Surveillance of critical infrastructure Deploying assets in suspicious locations near critical infrastructure 47 Appendix E: Worker Safety and Health The County Risk Management Department guides each department on the OSHA worker safety and health program, including injury illness and prevention protocols. 48 Appendix F: Public Information Purpose: This supporting element is to establish uniform guidelines and practices for the effective development, coordination, and dissemination of emergency information to the public in the case of an emergency or disaster. It establishes the parameters for the Contra Costa County Joint Information System procedures for: • Rapid delivery of accurate information and instructions to the public and media • Response to public and media inquiries • Dissemination of critical information to internal and external partners • Establishment of a Joint Information System (JIS) and Joint Information Center (JIC) Assumptions: During emergencies: • The public and media will need information about the situation and instructions on what actions to take. • Residents will make better decisions if given updated information regularly. • Local media can provide an essential role in delivering information and instructions to the public; regional or national media may also play a role and need to be considered. • Many communication channels exist, but not all may be available in an emergency. The situation will drive the media and tools to be used. • Monitoring of the media will require advanced planning to know which methods they are using to disseminate information besides their primary channels. • Social media will be the most challenging to monitor and control but have significant value to the public. • Perception is the key; Joint Information System team members must convey calm presence, authority, and situational understanding to the media and the public. Objectives: • To guide public action as determined by the EOC Director in an Emergency Operations Center or the Incident Commander if in the field. • To gain public confidence by providing timely, accurate, credible , and actionable information. • To keep the public calm by building trust, providing them with the process to find answers, specific actions to take, and reassuring them. 49 • To meet the needs of the news media and social media influencers. • To meet the needs of internal and external partners and stakeholders. • To meet the needs of people with disabilities, others with access and functional needs, and others who would be considered vulnerable in an emergency. • To provide information to the public in coordination with the city, state, and federal agencies and community-based and non-government organizations. Practices and Guidelines: • It is the policy of Contra Costa County to develop plans and procedures to address public information needs during an emergency or disaster response within the County. • The lead Public Information Officer (PIO) and additional designated PIOs will coordinate efforts to provide timely and practical information before, during, and following a significant emergency or crisis that affects public safety, public health, community well- being, and continuity of operations. • The PIO is responsible for disseminating accurate and timely information to affected populations, considering people with access and functional needs. • Multi-lingual support such as translation services and non -English broadcast media cooperation may be explored to communicate more effectively with a diverse public. • Information released to the media and public will be verified by the EOC Director's public information staff. • Contra Costa County will use the concept of a JIC to coordinate the release of information, and a Joint Information System or virtual Joint Information Center when physically co- locating is not possible or practical. • A joint information center will be opened when more than one agency is involved or impacted in an emergency incident. Media Access: • Media access to PIOs during an emergency/disaster will be provided through contacts within the EOC or a field JIC. Physical access to the EOC will not be permitted without the permission of the EOC Director, and a PIO must always accompany the media. • Disaster and accident scenes may be closed to the public under the authority of 409.5(a) P.C., which states, “…a menace to the public health or safety is created by a calamity such as a flood, storm, fire, earthquake, explosion or other disasters….” • It is essential to note that 409.5(d) P.C. states, “Nothing in this section shall prevent a duly authorized representative of any news service from entering the area closed….” After being advised of any existing danger, news media members are permitted free movement in the 50 area if they do not hamper, deter, or interfere with law enforcement or public safety functions. Primary Responsibilities for the Public Information Officer: • Evaluate the need for and, as appropriate, establish and operate a Joint Information System. • Establish a JIC as necessary to coordinate and disseminate accurate and timely information. • Determine from the EOC Director or Incident Commander if limits on information available and the release scope. • Develop material for use in media briefings. • Obtain approval of media releases. • Inform the media and moderate media briefings, whether in person, conference call , or other means. • Arrange for tours, interviews, or briefings as needed. • Maintain current information summaries and display boards about the incident. • Maintain an Activity log for PIOs. • Manage media and public inquiries. • Coordinate emergency public information and warnings. • Monitor media and social media reporting for accuracy and take corrective action where needed. • Ensure that all required agency forms, reports, and documents have been completed before demobilizing a Joint Information Center or System. PIO Roles and Functions within a JIC: • Lead PIO with overall responsibility for Joint Information Center operations • Information Gathering • Information Verification • Coordination and Production of Messaging • Information Dissemination • Media Monitoring • Social Media Monitoring • Liaison • Provides coordinated communication with crucial program areas and other entities involved in response and recovery operations • Coordinates with elected officials, community leaders, VIPs, and other governmental and non-governmental organization support agencies 51 Documents available in the EOC go-box and PIO electronic go-materials: • Lead PIO Checklist • PIO Checklist by Role and Function • PIO Contacts • Media Contacts • JIC Templates Special Districts A local government unit with authority or responsibility to own, operate, and maintain systems, programs, services, or projects for natural disaster assistance. This may include joint powers authority established in the California Code of Regulations. 52 Appendix G: Private Sector Coordination The involvement of NGOs, special districts, and private sector organizations with Contra Costa County will vary according to the incident type, resources that may be made available, and the types of resources needed. Some organizations may use internally established mutual aid systems/arrangements in order to acquire needed resources. For example, the American Red Cross will utilize the American Red Cross Disaster Services Human Resources System (DSHR) when a disaster response requires greater resourcing than can be provided from the local chapter. Volunteer agencies and private agencies may participate in the mutual aid system along with governmental agencies. Some volunteer agencies such as the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, Auxiliary Communication Services, Community Emergency Response Teams, Volunteer Organizations Active in Disasters (VOAD), faith-based organizations and others are an essential element of the statewide emergency response to meet the needs of disaster victims. Volunteer agencies mobilize volunteers and other resources through their own systems. They also may identify resource needs that are not met within their own systems that would be requested through the mutual aid system. Partnership Organizations: Non-Profit Agencies • American Red Cross exists to provide compassionate care to those in need. The network of donors, volunteers, and employees share a mission of preventing and relieving suffering through disaster relief efforts. In addition, the Red Cross supports the EOC Care and Shelter Branch. • Volunteer Organizations Active in Disasters (VOAD) improve outcomes for people affected by disasters by facilitating cooperation, communication, coordination, and collaboration among nonprofit organizations, community-based groups, government agencies, and for- profit companies. • Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) programs educates people about disaster preparedness for hazards that may impact their area. The program trains members in basic disaster response skills, such as fire safety, light search and rescue, team organization, and disaster medical operations. CERT members can assist others in their neighborhood or workplace following an event when professional responders are not immediately available to help. CERT members also are encouraged to support emergency response agencies by taking a more active role in emergency preparedness projects in their community. • Salvation Army is a ministry with a mission to meet human needs without discrimination. In addition, they can provide feeding services in a disaster. 53 • Saint Vincent de Paul Society is a nonprofit organization that provides direct assistance to anyone suffering or in need. They offer a lifeline to those who want food and clothing, rent assistance, medical aid, help with addiction or incarceration, employment, and shelter. • Community Awareness and Emergency Response (CAER) is a nonprofit public benefit corporation. CAER is a group of emergency response agencies, local government officials, and businesses. CAER's mission is to actively enhance public health and safety for those that store, handle, produce or transport hazardous materials. They support their mission by focusing on: o Facilitation of cooperative safety improvements of industrial plant operations o Promotion of coordinated mutual emergency aid o Provide emergency preparedness and response information to the public o Communication to the public's concerns about the safety of industrial facility operations o Offer credible facts and analysis on the efficacy of public policy related to public safety issues and safe facility performance 54 Appendix H: Disaster Service Workers, Volunteers, and Donations Management Disaster Service Workers Under California Government Code Sections 3100-3109, all public employees are required to serve as Disaster Service Workers (DSWs). Public employees are all persons em ployed by any county, city, state agency or public district in the State of California. Disaster Service Workers provide services and support during declared emergencies or disasters. In the event of a major emergency or disaster, the County has the power to assign employees to serve as DSWs assisting with any Disaster Service Activity that promotes the protection of public health and safety, promotes the preservation of lives and property, or is otherwise deemed necessary by the County’s Director of Emergency Services in the execution of his or her duties. Employees may be assigned by the County to fulfill emergency action needs outside the course and scope of their regular job duties and job hours. When serving as a DSW, an employee may also be directed to report to a different supervisor and/or to work at a different location than normal in order to fulfill the DSW role. DSW’s may be asked to assist in support shelter operations, staff the Emergency Operations Center, work at a logistics base in the field, etc.… Assignments may require service at locations, times and under conditions other than normal work assignments. Additional Disaster Service Worker designated individuals include medical personnel that may provide medical services if an emergency has been declared, and as requested by a Contra Costa County Official, and Volunteer Community Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD) staff and volunteers. Under no circumstances will County employees that do not usually have a response role in their day-to-day responsibilities be asked to perform duties or functions that are hazardous, that they have not been trained to perform or that are beyond their recognized capabilities. Volunteer and Donations Management The Volunteer and Donations Management Unit is part of the Logistics Section of the County’s EOC staff. Organized and trained volunteer groups and non -governmental organizations (NGOs) provide critical services in a disaster. Although it is recommended that volunteers pre-affiliate before any emergency, there may be spontaneous volunteers who will require processing. In addition, organizations have been identified, which can assist with bulk/in-kind donations processing and distribution, and monetary donations. Templates with public messaging exist to 55 notify the community as to what items are needed and where the items can be brought to assist with an emergency. Governmental Volunteer Groups Contra Costa County Area Agency on Aging provides leadership in addressing issues that relate to older residents, to develop community-based systems of care that provide services that support independence within our local community interdependent society, and which protects the quality of life of older adults and persons with functional impairments, and to promote citizen involvement in the planning and delivery of service. Office of the Sheriff - Emergency Services Support Unit and Marine Patrol The Emergency Services Support Unit (ESSU) manages volunteer groups that contribute significantly to emergency operations. Activation of the Sheriff's volunteer programs is facilitated through the Law Branch Mutual Aid Coordinator in the Emergency Operations Center. Groups listed are managed by ESSU, except for the Dive Team, which is governed by the Office of the Sheriff's Marine Patrol. • Air Squadron – Pilots and observers provide air operations support to include transportation, surveillance, logistics, and disaster response. • Cadets – Young adults participate in public events, search and rescue, and traffic enforcement. • Communications Unit – Licensed amateur radio operators to provide alternate communication to the operational area in support of an exercise or emergency. • Chaplains – The chaplaincy program provides support, comfort, guidance, and counseling in times of crisis to the law enforcement community and the public. • Dive Team – Certified rescue divers are available to assist with evidence collection, victim recovery, hazardous object removal, inspections, and disaster response . • Food Service Unit – Volunteers support field operations during training and emergency events by providing nourishing meals. • Ground Search and Rescue Team – Volunteers are requested to assist in locating missing or at-risk persons, evidence collection, public events, and disaster response . • Reserve Deputy Sheriffs – Reserves assist with in-custody transportation, patrol and detention duties, and special assignments such as DUI checkpoints, off-road activities, and special events. 56 • SAVES – Sheriff's All Volunteer Extended Services – This diverse unit of community members with varying skill sets assist with the delivery of logistical and clerical support, mostly in field operations and administrative assignments. • Air Squadron Pilots and observers provide air operations support to include transportation, surveillance, logistics, and disaster response. Disaster Service Volunteer Groups Contra Costa Health Services Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) was developed as part of the County's emergency planning and response system. It addresses the need for additional medical professionals to respond to a medical surge event or an event requiring the mass distribution of pharmaceuticals. Oversight is provided by the Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) as lead agency with support from Contra Costa Health Services. MRC is a national network of unpaid volunteers, organized locally to improve the health and s afety of their communities. In California, there are 35 MRC Units and 33 are in the Disaster Healthcare Volunteers (DHV) System. These units can include both medical and non-medical volunteers that support medical missions. California Healthcare Volunteers (DHV) is a group of licensed healthcare providers, public health professionals, or medical disaster response team members who volunteer for disaster service work throughout the State. Volunteer and donation groups can significantly enhance and supplement emergency response personnel and materials. 57 Appendix I: Training and Exercises Training, tests, and exercises are essential to ensure public officials, emergency response personnel, and the public are ready in an emergency. As part of the emergency management training curriculum, it is recommended that personnel with emergency responsibilities complete emergency management courses as described by the SEMS Approved Course of Instruction and the NIMS integration criteria. The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services provides emergency managers and first responders training through the California Specialized Training Institute. Each agency maintains activity and exercise records that demonstrate self-certification and compliance with SEMS and NIMS. Preparedness Exercises Exercises provide personnel with an opportunity to become familiar with the procedures, facilities , and systems that will be used in an emergency. County departments should plan for and participate in an exercise program involving emergency management response personnel from multiple disciplines and jurisdictions. Exercises should: • Be as realistic as possible • Use the application of SEMS • Be based on risk assessments • Include non-governmental organizations and the private sector when appropriate • Refer to state and federal guidelines for other specifics The County Office of Emergency Services updates the Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan annually to include several tabletop exercises, one functional EOC exercise, and ongoing in person and virtual trainings. Public Awareness The County Office of Emergency Services provides public awareness and educational campaigns continually. The Office of Emergency Services maintains a directory of websites for more in-depth follow-up on emergency preparedness efforts such as Community Emergency Response Teams, 58 fire safety, health and well-being, and hazardous materials. In addition, presentations, consultations, and plan reviews are conducted routinely, along with research services and pamphlet distribution. It is well documented that the better prepared our communities are in advance of an emergency, the easier response efforts will be, and the sooner they can transition to recovery. 59 Appendix J: Authorities and References The following references provide authority for the development and utilization of the Plan. Local • Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, Title 4 Health and Safety, Chapter 42-2 Disaster Council and Emergency Services • County Administrators Bulletin 115 Emergency Management Plan • General Plan, Section 10 – Safety Element • Sheriff’s Office Policies and Procedures 1.06.22 Emergency Activation of Personnel and 1.06.23 Major Disaster Response State • California Emergency Services Act, Chapter 7, Division 1, Title 2 of the Government Code • Standardized Emergency Management System Guidelines, to include function-specific handbook • Cal EMA Guidance on Planning and Responding to the Needs of People with Access and Functional Needs • California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement • California Coroner’s Mutual Aid Plan • California Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Plan • California Natural Disaster Assistance Act, Chapter 7.5, Division 1, Title 3 • State of California Emergency Plan • California Public Health and Medical Emergency Operations Manual • Regional Catastrophic Earthquake Plan • Regional Emergency Coordination Plan (RECP) Federal • Civil Defense Act of 1950 • Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988 • Homeland Security Presidential Directive, HSPD – 5, NIMS • Disaster Mitigation Act • National Response Framework • National Planning Scenarios • National Response Recovery Framework • Americans with Disabilities Act • Comprehensive Planning Guide – CPG 101 60 Appendix K: Individual and Family Emergency Preparedness Preparation will increase survivability. Individuals and families should have the supplies and plans in place to make it on their own. Everyone should be prepared no matter where they are when a disaster strikes. Below are some ideas that can help prepare for the unexpected. • Actions to take • Have a kit of emergency supplies • Plan for what you will do in an emergency • Stay informed about what might happen • Get involved in preparing your community • Know your resources • Partner with everyone (fellow parents, neighbors, church members, etc.) • Be aware of assets near you; shopping centers, medical facilities, fire stations, etc. • Inventory your supplies often • Know your hazards • Flood zones where you work • House near open space susceptible to fire or landslide • Church located near a chemical plant • Airport, rail, or other transportation hazards • Understand protective actions • Earthquake: Duck, cover, and hold • Fire: Stop, drop and roll • Flood: Evacuate to higher ground • Hazardous Material release: Shelter in place, unless otherwise notified • Severe weather: Stay indoors Remain mindful of age-related needs for both children and seniors, and plan for those with unique medical, physical, and emotional needs. Consider a plan and kit for pets. Remember, attitude is everything! Rehearse in your mind, have documents in order, and physically practice your plan. 61 Appendix L: Emergency Management The following is a list of questions that may help answer when responding to an incident. Remember, not all questions are mandatory to answer in every situation. This is simply a list to help those arriving at the EOC gain an understanding of the operating picture: • What happened? • What is the name of the incident? (Year/Month/Day/Location/Type) • When did the incident start? (Date/Time) • What type of incident is it? • What is the severity of the Incident? (Low, Moderate, High, Catastrophic) • What was the cause? • Does the EOC require activation? If yes, what level? (Monitoring, Partial or Full) • What is the current status of the incident? (Green, Yellow, Red) • What is the prognosis? (Stable, Worsening, Improving) • What is the location of the incident? (Address or Map Coordinates) • Who is the lead agency? • Who is the Point of Contact (Name, Phone Number, E-mail)? Incident Summary: • Who is affected? • How many, injured, deceased? • What is the property damage? • Mutual aid needed? • Public Information Messaging? • Any other resources needed? 62 Appendix M: Glossary of Terms After Action Report (AAR): Documents identified successes during emergency operations and described a plan to implement improvements. California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement (MMAA): An agreement entered into by and between the State of California, its various departments and agencies and various political subdivisions, municipal corporations, and public agencies of the State of California to assist each other by providing resources during an emergency. Mutual Aid occurs when two or more parties agree to furnish resources and facilities and render services to each other in response to any disaster or emergency. California Emergency Services Act (CESA): An Act within the California Government Code to ensure that preparations within the state will be adequate to deal with natural, man-made, or war-caused emergencies which result in conditions of disaster or extreme peril to life, property , and the natural resources of the state and generally to protect the health and safety and preserve the lives and property of the people of the state. Continuity of Government (COG): Activities that address the continuance of constitutional governance. COG planning aims to preserve and reconstitute the government institution and maintain a department or agency’s constitutional, legislative, and administrative responsibilities . This is accomplished through a succession of leadership, the pre-delegation of emergency authority, and active command and control during response and recovery operations. Continuity of Operations (COOP): Planning should be instituted (including all levels of government) across the private sector and non-governmental organizations as appropriate to ensure the continued performance of core capabilities and critical government operations during any potential incident. Critical Infrastructure: Systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital to the operational area that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, local economic security, public health or safety, or any combination of those matters. Department Operations Center (DOC): A facility used by a distinct discipline, such as flood operations, fire, medical, hazardous material, or a unit, such as the Department of Public Works or Department of Health. DOCs may be used at all SEMS levels above the field response level depending upon the emergency needs. Emergency Operations Center (EOC): The location from which centralized emergency management can be performed. An agency or jurisdiction establishes EOC facilities to coordinate the overall agency or jurisdictional response and support to an emergency. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP): The ongoing plan maintained by various jurisdictional levels for responding to a wide variety of potential hazards. 63 HAZUS: A nationally applicable standardized methodology that contains models for estimating potential losses from earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. HAZUS uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology to assess disasters' physical, economic, and social impacts. Incident: An occurrence or event, either human-caused or by natural phenomena, requires action by emergency response personnel to prevent or minimize loss of life or damage to property and the environment. Incident Command: Responsible for the overall management of the incident and consists of the Incident Commander, either single or unified command, and any assigned supporting staff. Incident Commander (IC): The individual responsible for all incident activities, including developing strategies and tactics and ordering and releasing resources. The IC has overall authority and responsibility for conducting incident operations and managing all incident operations at the incident site. Incident Command Post (ICP): The field location where the primary functions are performed. The ICP may be co-located with the incident base or other incident facilities. Incident Command System (ICS): A standardized on-scene emergency management concept specifically designed to allow its user(s) to adopt an integrated org anizational structure equal to the complexity and demands of single or multiple incidents without being hindered by jurisdictional boundaries. Information: Pieces of raw, unanalyzed data that identifies persons, evidence, events; or illustrates processes that specify the occurrences of an event. It may be objective or subjective and is intended for both internal analysis and external (news media) applications. Information is the “currency” that produces intelligence. Intelligence: The product of an analytical process that evaluates information collected from diverse sources, integrates relevant information into a cohesive package, and produces a conclusion or estimate. The information must be honest, accurate, and verified before it becomes intelligence for planning purposes. Intelligence relates to the specific details involving the activities of an incident or EOC and current and expected conditions and how they affect the actions taken to achieve operational period objectives. Intelligence is an aspect of information. Intelligence is primarily intended for internal use and not for public dissemination. Interoperability: Allows emergency management/response personnel and their affiliated organizations to communicate within and across agencies and jurisdictions via voice, data, or video-on-demand, in real-time, when needed and when authorized. 64 Joint Information Center (JIC): A facility established to coordinate all incident-related public information activities. It is the central point of contact for all news media. General information officials from all participating agencies should co-locate at the JIC. Joint Information System (JIS): A JIS is the information network of all government, volunteer, and private-sector organizations with operations directly related to the incident. A JIS coordinates public information network with shared resources and agreed-upon procedures that link participants through technological means when geographic restrictions, incident management requirements, and other limitations preclude physical attendance at a central location. The JIS allows public information staff to communicate effectively and make joint announcements as if they were in the same facility. Jurisdiction: The range or sphere of authority. Public agencies have jurisdiction over an incident related to their legal responsibilities and authority for incident mitigation . Jurisdictional authority at an incident can be political or geographical (e.g., special district, city, county, state, or federal boundary lines) or functional (e.g., police department, health department, etc.). Liaison Officer: A member of the Command Staff responsible for coordinating with representatives from cooperating and assisting agencies. At SEMS EOC levels, a coordinator may perform the function and report directly to the EOC Director within a section or branch. Local Government: Means local agencies per Article 3 of the SEMS regulations. Government Code Section 8680.2 defines local agencies as any city, city and county, county, school district , or special district. Mitigation: Provides a critical foundation to reduce the loss of life and property from natural and man-made disasters by avoiding or lessening the impact of a disaster and providing value to the public by creating safer communities. Mitigation seeks to fix the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage. These activities or actions, in most cases, will have a long- term sustained effort. Multiagency Coordination System (MACS): The combination of personnel, facilities, equipment, procedures, and communications integrated into a standard system. When activated, MACS are responsible for assisting agency resources and support in a multi-agency or multijurisdictional environment. A MAC Group functions within the MACS. National Planning Frameworks: One for each preparedness mission area (prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and disaster recovery), describe how the whole community works together to achieve the National Preparedness Goal. The Goal is: “A secure and resilient nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.” The Goal is the 65 cornerstone for the implementation of the Presidential Policy Directive / PPD-8: National Preparedness. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO): An entity with an association that is based on the interests of its members, individuals, or institutions. A government does not create it, but it may work cooperatively with the government. Such organizations serve a public purpose, not a private benefit. Examples of NGOs include faith-based charity organizations and the American Red Cross. Operational Area (OA): An intermediate level of the state emergency organization, consisting of a county and all other political subdivisions within the geographical boundaries of the county. Operational Period: The time scheduled for executing a given set of operation actions, as specified in the Incident Action Plan. Operational periods can be of various lengths but typically last 12-24 hours. Political Subdivisions: Includes any city, county, tax, assessment district, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries. Public Information: Processes, procedures, and systems for communicating timely, accurate, and accessible information on the incident’s cause, size, and current situation; resources committed; protective actions to take; and other matters of general interest to the public, responders , and additional stakeholders (both directly and indirectly affected). Regional Emergency Operations Center (REOC): Facilities found at Cal OES Administrative Regions. REOCs coordinate information and resources among operational areas and between the operational areas and the state level. Resource Management: Efficient emergency management and incident response require a system for identifying available resources at all jurisdictional levels to enable timely and unimpeded access to resources needed to prepare for, respond to, or recover from an incident. Resource management under NIMS includes mutual aid agreements and assistance agreements; the use of special federal, state, tribal, and local teams; and resource mobilization protocols. Resources: Personnel and equipment available, or potentially available, for assignment to incidents or EOCs. Resources are described by kind and type and may be used in supervisory capacities at an incident or EOCs. Section: The organizational level with responsibility for a major functional area of the incident or at an EOC (e.g., Operations, Planning/Intelligence, Logistics, Finance/Administration). Situation Report (SITREP): Emergency Operations Centers are responsible for gathering timely, accurate, accessible, and consistent intelligence during an emergency. Situation reports should create a common operating picture and adjust the operational goals, priorities, and strategies. Special District: A unit of local government (other than a city, county, city, and county) with authority or responsibility to own, operate and maintain systems, programs, services, or projects 66 (as defined in section 2900, subdivision (hh) of title 19 of the California Code of Regulations) for purposes of natural disaster assistance. This may include a joint power of authority established under Section 6500 et. seq. Stafford Act: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act establishes the programs and processes for the federal government to provide disaster and emergency assistance to states, local governments, tribal nations, individuals, and qualified non-profit organizations. The provision of the Stafford Act covers all hazards, including natural disasters and terrorist events. Relevant provisions of the Stafford Act include a process for Governors to request federal disaster and emergency assistance from the President. The President may declare a major disaster or emergency. Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS): A system required by California Government Code and established by regulations for managing response s to multiagency and multijurisdictional emergencies in California. SEMS consists of five organizational levels activated as necessary: Field response, Local Government, Operational Area, Region, and State. State Operations Center (SOC): An EOC facility operated by the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services at the state level in SEMS. Unified Command (UC): Unified Command is a structure that brings together the Incident Commanders of major organizations involved in an incident to coordinate an effective response while at the same time allowing each to carry out their own jurisdictional, legal, and functional responsibilities. The Unified Command links the organizations responding to the incident and provides a forum for these entities to make consensual decisions. Under the Unified Command, the various jurisdictions, agencies, and non-government responders should blend throughout the Incident Command System to create an integrated response tea m. Members of the Unified Command work together to develop a standard set of incident objectives and strategies, share information, maximize available resources, and enhance the efficiency of the individual response organizations. OCTOBER 2022 Public Protection CommitteeEmergency Operations Plan Review Emergency Operations Plan CCC Emergency Operations Plan updated every five years Plan is updated to meet new legislation, priorities or changes in response Changes made as a result of lessons learned during emergency responses 2 Purpose, Scope, and Assumptions The plan is a guidebook for the Contra Costa Operational Area to be used during all-hazard emergency management events Facilitates coordination among agencies and jurisdictions in Contra Costa County Emphasizes Emergency Management Best Practices Is Scalable and Flexible in its approach Establishes operational concepts and standard operating procedures associated with Emergency Operations Center activities The plan: 3 The Plan Complements the EOC Role The Emergency Operations Center’s Role During Large-scale Emergencies: •Incident Support •Information Management and Public Information Dissemination •Resource Coordination •Multi-agency Coordination •Policy & Strategic Objectives •Disaster Recovery •Supports interagency coordination and executive decision-making during incident response 4 Updates and Changes Simplifies language and updates graphics Enhances focus on Access and Functional Needs (AFN) planning Enhances the “Whole Community Approach” to plan development Outlines threats to include Natural, Technological, Biological, and Human Caused Updates Climate Change/Sea Level Rise information Clarifies EOC activation levels 5 Plan Review OES/Sheriff’s Office Staff County’s Access and Functional Needs EOC Coordination Team Cal OES Local Emergency Managers (Danville, Concord, Richmond) 6 Questions/ Next Steps EOC FUNCTIONAL EXERCISE AUGUST 2022 7 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County the attached Settlement and Release Agreement with SunPower Corporation, Systems to pay the County $127,066 for lost energy savings due to delays in installation of solar generating and storage facilities under power purchase agreements for 4545 and 4549 Delta Fair Blvd., Antioch, and 2530 Arnold Drive and 1000 Ward Street, Martinez, as recommended by the Public Works Director. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, to execute on behalf of the County the attached Consent and Agreement among the County, Solar Star Co Co 2, LLC, and ST TOTAL Strong Statutory Trust, to authorize the assignment of the power purchase agreements for the above four sites to ST TOTAL Strong Statutory Trust following receipt of the above payment from SunPower. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to withdraw the County’s notice of default and payment bond claim, and take related actions, following receipt of the above payment from SunPower. AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute any other documents required for financing or completion of construction at the four sites. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 11/29/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Acuff, Division Manager - Capital Projects, (925) 957-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: November 29, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Stephen M. Siptroth, Deputy County Counsel, Warren Lai, Deputy Director, Public Works, Jeff Acuff, Division Manager - Capital Projects, Public Works C.111 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:November 29, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Settlement and release agreement with SunPower Corporation, Systems – 4545 & 4549 Delta Fair Blvd; 2530 Arnold Dr.; 1000 Ward Street FISCAL IMPACT: 100% incoming funds to offset increased electricity cost from missed energy savings. BACKGROUND: In 2019, the County entered into power purchase agreements (PPAs) with Solar Star Co Co 1, LLC, for the installation and operation of solar generating facilities at 4545 and 4549 Delta Fair Blvd., Antioch, and 2530 Arnold Drive and 1000 Ward Street, Martinez, and additional solar storage facilities at 2530 Arnold Drive, and 1000 Ward Street. Under the PPAs, SunPower, as contractor for Solar Star, is responsible for installing the facilities. Starting with commercial operation of the facilities and continuing for a 25-year term, the County will purchase power generated by the facilities at substantially discounted rates compared to market rates charged by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. In 2020, the PPAs were assigned from Solar Star Co Co 1, LLC to Solar Star Co Co 2, LLC and Solar Star Co Co 3, LLC. Completion of the four sites was delayed significantly due to issues within the control of Solar Star and/or SunPower. These delays, which lasted almost one year, involved issues with timely payment of subcontractors and with the design of facilities in accordance with current fire code standards. As a result of these delays, the County had to pay higher power costs for almost a year and was unable to realize energy savings and purchase discounted power at these four sites in Antioch and Martinez. To address these delays, which constituted defaults under the power purchase agreements, the County in April and May 2022 sent a notice of default and filed a payment bond claim, demanding that SunPower and its bonding company cure and correct these defaults. Over the following months, SunPower resolved all payment defaults, resumed work in earnest on the four sites in Antioch and Martinez, and offered the County $127,066 in compensation for the lost energy savings at the four sites. SunPower now expects that the four sites will be placed into commercial operation by November 30, 2022. Under the settlement agreement (Settlement and Release Agreement), SunPower will pay the County $127,066 for lost energy savings at the four sites through November 30, 2022. Public Works Department staff have determined this amount is adequate to compensate the County for the difference between the higher cost of power from PG&E during the period of delay, and the lower amount the County would have paid for power under the PPAs had the sites been placed into commercial operation by the time required under those agreements. In consideration for that payment, the County will release SunPower from any claims to compensation for missed energy savings at the four sites through November 30, 2022. As part of the financing for the four sites, SunPower will be assigning the PPAs to ST TOTAL Strong Statutory Trust as lessor, with Solar Star Co Co 2, LLC as lessee, and requires the County’s consent to that assignment. The consent to the assignment (Consent and Agreement) provides that there are no outstanding defaults and that the County has no credits or offsets for the County’s purchase of energy under the PPAs. Therefore, the Public Works Director, or designee, will be in a position to execute the Consent and Agreement when the County receives payment under the settlement agreement. With the four sites now nearing completion, Public Works Department staff have determined that there are no outstanding defaults other than the missed energy savings and that the above payment is adequate to compensate the County for those missed savings through November 30, 2022. For these reasons, the Public Works Director recommends that the Board approve the settlement agreement and authorize the execution of the consent to assignment of the PPAs following receipt of the settlement payment from SunPower. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would not be compensated for missed energy savings and SunPower would be unable to assign the power purchase agreements, thereby further delaying commercial operation of the four sites.