The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 10112022 - Completed Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 KAREN MITCHOFF, CHAIR, 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board meeting will be accessible in-person, via television, and via live-streaming to all members of the public. Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27, ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32, and can be seen live online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. Persons who wish to address the board during public comment or with respect to an item on the agenda may comment in person or may call in during the meeting by dialing 888-278-0254 followed by the access code 843298#. A caller should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item, by pushing "#2" on their phone. Access via Zoom is also available using the following link: https://cccounty-us.zoom.us/j/87344719204 . Those participating via Zoom should indicate they wish to speak on an agenda item by using the “raise your hand” feature in the Zoom app. To provide contact information, please contact Clerk of the Board at clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us or call 925-655-2000. Meetings of the Board are closed-captioned in real time. Public comment generally will be limited to two minutes. Your patience is appreciated. A Spanish language interpreter is available to assist Spanish-speaking callers. A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair. Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible online at www.contracosta.ca.gov. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES October 11, 2022 9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) 1. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) Jim Lynn Bennefield v. Patrick Mazerski, et al.; Yolo County Superior Court, Case No. CV2021-04251. Inspirational Thought- "For what it is worth...it's never too late to be whoever you want to be. I hope you live a life you're proud of, and if you find that you're not, I hope you have the strength to start over." ~F. Scott Fitzgerald Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator Speakers on In-Home Support Services (IHSS) SEIU 2015 negotiations: Mahmoud Sedaghatian; Guenetta Duchine; Shannon Stotz; Guillermina Nazariego Salazar ; Marina Santamaria; Lawana Bran; Sharizod; Javeta Gregory; Lilly Pinero; No name given. CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.55 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items. Speakers on In-Home Support Services (IHSS) negotiations: Mahmoud; Winetta Duschine; Shannon Stotz; Imina ; Marina Santa Maria; Lawanda Brown; Sharizod; Javetta Gregory; Lilly Panero; No name given. PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each) PRESENTATION recognizing Firefighter John Martinez as the 2022 Firefighter of the Year. (Lewis Broschard, Fire Chief) PRESENTATION recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). (Supervisor Mitchoff) PRESENTATION supporting the local, state, and federal efforts to exonerate the Port Chicago 50. (Supervisors Mitchoff and Glover) DISCUSSION ITEMS D.1 ACCEPT update on COVID-19 and PROVIDE direction to staff. (Anna Roth, Health Services Director) Speakers: Caller 6770; No name given. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.2 HEARING to consider an appeal of the County Planning Commission’s approval of a tree permit to allow the removal of 26 trees and work within the driplines of five trees for the purpose of constructing a new single-family residence at 5 Casa de Campo in the unincorporated Martinez area. (David Viggiano—Applicant; USGL Land, LLC—Property Owner) (Dan and Sibhan Stokes—Appellants) (Lashun Cross, Department of Conservation and Development) Presentation from legal representative for Mr. and Mrs. Dan and Sibhan Stokes, Vince Moita. Presentation by David Viggiano, USGO Land LLC, project architect. Speakers: Leslie Ries, Alhambra Valley Improvement Association; Todd Kilbourne; Jay Howard; No name given. Written commentary received from: Kenric and Billie Fivella; Delores White; Jamie & Mike Menasco; Marell & Mike Jones; Dave Silva and Leslie Walsh; Gary Thompson and Carol Arnold; Vickie Dawes (attached). D.3 CONSIDER a position of "Support" on Proposition 30, an initiative statute on the November 8, 2022 statewide general election ballot that provides funding for programs to reduce air pollution and prevent wildfires by increasing tax on personal income over $2 million. (Supervisors Gioia and Mitchoff) Speakers: Gretchen Newsom, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); Augustina Olman; No name given; William Muetzenberg, ; Sandra Lowe, City of Sonoma; Oscar Garcia, California EnviroVoters; Caller 6770. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District II Supervisor Candace Andersen D. 4 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2022/355 approving the Side Letter Agreements between the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and IAFF, Local 1230 and the United Chief Officers Association addressing terms and conditions of employment for current City of Pinole fire suppression staff who become employed by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District as a result of the contract for fire protection services. (David Sanford, Chief of Labor Relations) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.5 CONSIDER authorizing the Board of Supervisors, in all its capacities, and its subcommittees, and its advisory bodies to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e), make related findings, and take related actions. (Mary Ann McNett Mason, County Counsel) Speakers: No name given. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 6 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed. There were no consent items removed for discussion. D. 7 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker) No name given, noted there have been occasions upon which the public has had difficulty acessing the phone in call number to the meetings and requested the information be on a chyron at the bottom of the screen during the meeting; No name given, feels that the Board taking position on legislation is inappropriate and an abuse of power. Caller 6770 spoke on perceived racist actions of Planned Parenthood that would be in conflict with the Board's adopted Resolution 2020-306 declaring racist a public health issue. He further objects to the content of a public service announce by Planned Parenthood in cartoonish style advising teens of the availability of puberty blocking medicaitons. Lonnie Bristow complimented the Board on their tolerance toward often vitriolic commentary from the public and would like the Board to reconsider the plan to close the Orin Allen Youth Facility (Boys Ranch). D. 8 CONSIDER reports of Board members. There were no items reported today. ADJOURN CONSENT ITEMS Road and Transportation C. 1 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/343 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close specific portions of Whyte Park Avenue, Center Street and Panoramic Way on October 12, 2022 through January 31, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of installing water main and appurtenances, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/345 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Wanda Street, on October 15, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/347 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS19-00003, for a project being developed by HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/348 accepting completion of improvements, accepting right of way dedication, and approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Road Improvement Agreement for development plan permit DP14-03041, for a project developed by IPT Richmond III LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, North Richmond area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports C. 5 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to apply for and accept a California Department of Water Resources Integrated Regional Water Management Grant in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for design, permitting, construction and monitoring of the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage Implementation Project, North Richmond area. (No County Match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation Claims, Collections & Litigation C. 6 APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE actions by the County Administrator, or her designee, in the case In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, to execute, on behalf of Contra Costa County, agreements which will allow attorneys’ fees to be paid from settlement funds from the National Opioid Settlement and cap fees owed by the County up to Five Percent (5%) of settlement funds received, approve bankruptcy plans of certain defendants, file a complaint against McKinsey & Co., approve settlement with Special Districts, and take related actions. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE County Counsel, or designee, to enter into a tolling agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company related to its claim for refund of property taxes for tax years 2018/19 through 2021/22. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 8 RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations C. 9 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/331 recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 10 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/351 proclaiming October 2022 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/344 supporting the local, state, and federal efforts to exonerate the Port Chicago 50, as recommended by Supervisors Mitchoff and Glover. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/352 recognizing the John Muir Community Health Fund on the Occasion of its 25th Anniversary, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 13 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/361 recognizing Firefighter John Martinez as the 2022 Firefighter of the Year, as recommended by the Fire Chief. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations C. 14 REAPPOINT Bethallyn Black to the Director 2 seat and Walter Pease to the Director 5 seat on the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District Board of Directors to new four-year terms expiring on November 30, 2026, as recommended by the Resource Conservation District Board of Directors. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 APPOINT Adey Teshager to the At-Large 6 Seat on the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls for a term ending February 28, 2026, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 16 REAPPOINT Penny Reed to At-Large Seat #1, Shirley Krohn to At Large Seat #2, Sara Shafiabady to At-Large Seat #4, Deborah Card to At-Large Seat #5, Steve Lipson to At-Large Seat #6, Terri Tobey to At-Large Seat #10, Nuru Neemwuchalla to At-Large Seat #12, Mary Bruns to At-Large Seat #15, Kevin Donovan to At-Large Seat #17, Michael Wener to At-Large Seat #18, and Sharon “Sam” Sakai-Miller to At-Large Seat #20 on the Contra Costa Advisory Council on Aging with terms expiring September 30, 2024, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 17 APPOINT Madhan Gunasekaran to the District 3 seat on the Fish & Wildlife Committee to a term expiring February 28, 2024 as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 18 APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, medical staff advancement, and voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive Committee and the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions C. 19 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26052 to increase the hours of one part time Clerk-Senior Level (represented) position to full time and add one Library Assistant-Journey Level (represented) position in the Library Department. (100% Library Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations C. 20 ADOPT an "Oppose" position on federal Senate Bill S.4295, a bill that would establish a duplicative set of federal financial reporting requirements in addition to those required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, as recommended by the County Administrator and the Auditor-Controller. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Leases C. 21 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a lease with the J. Mortz Limited Partnership for approximately 7,630 square feet of office space at 601 Ferry Street, Martinez for the Public Defender’s Office for a one-year term beginning November 14, 2022 at an annual rent of $100,716. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services: C. 22 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to apply for and accept American Rescue Plan Act, Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund allocation in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the provision of local government services at the direction of the Board of Supervisors, as recommended by the County Administrator. (100% American Rescue Plan Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 23 RATIFY the Health Services Department’s grant application; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept grant funding from the United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs for the Community Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative Grant funds, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the period October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2025. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a grant amendment with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, to extend the term through December 31, 2023 for the extension of the Green and Healthy Homes Program with no change in the amount payable to the County. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services: C. 25 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Experian Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $906,060 to renew its subscription to Experian’s Electronic Claims and Remittance Systems Software, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Loving Campos Associates, Architects, Inc. (dba LCA Architects, Inc.), effective October 11, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new payment limit of $700,000 for on-call architectural services, with no change to the term, Countywide. (100% Various Capital Project Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Accela, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $962,003 for its Software as a Service based Civic Platform for the Hazardous Materials and Environmental Health Divisions to track inspection and enforcement actions for the period October 11, 2022, through November 1, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner to execute a contract amendment with Arnold R. Josselson M.D., to increase the payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment limit in the amount of $1,175,000 to provide forensic pathology services through the existing term expiration on September 30, 2022. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new amount of $1,200,000 for the period of August 1, 2021 through August 30, 2022, to provide standard crime scene and biological cleaning services, and specialized cleaning services.(100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory in an amount not to exceed $360,000 to purchase dental supplies and prosthetics for the Contra Costa County Dental clinics for the period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with QlikTech Inc. in an amount not to exceed $451,881, and an Order form with QlikTech Inc. for analytics dashboard subscriptions for the period September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Public Works Director, a purchase order amendment with Crest/Good MFG. Co., Inc., effective October 11, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $201,000 to a new payment limit of $400,000 and extend the term through December 31, 2023, for detention facilities supplies and accessories, Countywide. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County, an C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County, an amendment to a blanket purchase order with Amazon.com Services, LLC, to increase the payment limit by $2,000,000 to a new payment limit of $2,700,000, with no change to the term ending June 21, 2024, for purchases under a cooperative purchasing agreement, Countywide. (100% User Departments) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Arthritis and Rheumatology Medical Associates, Inc.(dba Northern California Arthritis Center) in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 to provide rheumatology services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Agiliti Health, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to provide rental medical equipment and devices to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) for the period of October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2024. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), in an amount not to exceed $1,016,244 to provide augmented board and care services for Contra Costa County patients for the period December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. (91% Mental Health Realignment, 9% Mental Health Services Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Firstlocum, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,250,000 to provide temporary physician staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2024. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment between ERM-West, Inc. (ERM) and the County, the Hookston Group and Union Pacific Railroad, to extend the term from January 31, 2023 through June 30, 2023, and increase the payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment limit of $285,233, to enable ERM to continue providing remediation and related environmental services at an approximately eight-acre site located at the intersection of Hookston Road and Bancroft Road in Pleasant Hill. (100% Successor Agency funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Human Resources. or designee, to execute a contract with Biometrics4ALL, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $495,000 to provide Live Scan fingerprinting technology services, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025, with the option for two one-year extensions. (100% User Departments). AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center, in an amount not to exceed $3,702,962 to provide mental health services to adults diagnosed with severe and persistent mental illness for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, including a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $1,851,481. (43% Federal Medi-Cal, 43% Mental Health Realignment, 14% Mental Health Realignment non-medical) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Director, up to 1,500 Target gift cards each with a $20 value, in a total amount not to exceed $30,000 to incentivize several patient populations to obtain preventative care and services. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with EMBRACE, in an amount not to exceed $1,925,048 to provide therapeutic behavioral services and outpatient mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed children and youth and their families, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, including a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $962,524. (50% Federal Medi-Cal, 45% Mental Health Realignment, 5% Measure X). AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement with the Regents of the University of California, in an amount not to exceed $114,000, for Master Gardener Program services, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Mental Health Services Authority, in an amount not to exceed $78,000 to act as the fiscal and administrative agent and provide support and technical assistance for the Statewide Prevention Early Intervention Program for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. (100% Mental Health Services Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Adam Warren, M.D., Inc., A Professional Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $297,000 to provide orthopedic and surgical services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract cancelation with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., effective at the close of business on October 31, 2022. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Community Housing Development Corporation, to extend the term through April 1, 2025 with no change to the contract payment limit, to construct the Heritage Point Commercial Project in North Richmond, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. (100% Livable Communities Trust funds, District I portion) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay an amount not to exceed $40,626 to Medline Industries, Inc. for annual inventory services provided during the period of June 22, 2022, through June 30, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 APPROVE and ACKNOWLEDGE that, by its terms the contract between the County and Acclaim Mobility, LLC, pertaining to providing non-emergency transportation services for Contra Costa Health Plan members and initially approved on July 13, 2021 (Item C.69), with a total payment limit of $300,000, does not terminate on the date previously specified in the Board action but, instead, terminates on June 30, 2024. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Department, 400 BART ticket vouchers each with a $10 value totaling $4,000 and 500 bus tickets for AC Transit and County Connection each with a $5 value totaling $2,500 for clients of the Health Care for the Homeless Program, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (100% Health Resources and Services Administration) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a memorandum of agreement between the County, the City of Richmond, Eden Housing, and Community Housing and Development Corporation of North Richmond for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024, to acknowledge County participation in a Brownfields Assessment Coalition, as required by the terms of an assessment grant awarded to the City of Richmond by the Environmental Protection Agency, Richmond area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement authorizing the Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District, to provide emergency ambulance services in the County’s Emergency Response Area III for the period October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE the HOME Investment Partnerships Program - American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Allocation Plan as an amendment to the County's FY HOME 2021/22 Action Plan to add the $12,090,215 of HOME-ARP funding allocation; and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director to execute related administrative actions implementing the program. (100% Federal funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing C. 54 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing Committee and the Health Services Director, and as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 ALLOCATE $6,000 from the Livable Communities Trust (District II portion) to the Public Works Department for the construction of pedestrian signage at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Oakridge Lane in unincorporated Danville, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 655-2000. Anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda may contact the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California. Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000 or using the County's on line subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be viewed: www.contracosta.ca.gov STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez. AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT update on COVID-19 and PROVIDE direction to staff. FISCAL IMPACT: Administrative Reports with no specific fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department has established a website dedicated to COVID-19, including daily updates. The site is located at: https://www.coronavirus.cchealth.org/ APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Monica Nino I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Update on COVID -19 CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Caller 6770; No name given. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to approve a Tree Permit to construct a new single-family residence on an undeveloped lot that requires removal of 21 trees consisting of 20 Oak trees and 1 Bay Laurel tree and work within the dripline of 5 Oak trees, and removal of 5 additional Oak trees because they are dead, at 5 Casa de Campo in the unincorporated Martinez area of the county (County File #CDTP21-00076), RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2. DENY the appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Dan and Sibhan Stokes of 130 Oak Bridge Lane in Martinez. 3. APPROVE Tree Permit CDTP21-00076 to allow the removal of 21 trees consisting of 20 Oaks and 1 Bay Laurel and work within the dripline of 5 Oaks to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot, and allow the removal of 5 additional Oaks that are dead, at 5 Casa de Campo in the unincorporated Martinez area. 4. APPROVE the findings in support of the project. 5. APPROVE the project conditions of approval. 6. DETERMINE that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a)(new construction). 7. DIRECT the Director of Conservation and Development to file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the necessary application deposit, and is obligated to pay supplemental fees to cover all additional costs associated with the application process. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Dominique Vogelpohl, (925) 655-2880 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Appeal of the County Planning Commission’s Decision to Approve Tree Permit County File #CDTP21-00076 BACKGROUND: This hearing is to consider an appeal of the County Planning Commission’s June 22, 2022 decision to deny an appeal and approve a tree permit to allow the removal of 26 trees and work within the driplines of 5 trees for the purpose of constructing a new single-family residence at 5 Casa de Campo in the unincorporated Martinez area. Site Description: The subject property is a 5.619-acre vacant lot that is part of the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision in an established single-family residential neighborhood within the unincorporated area of Martinez. The subject property is located on Casa de Campo and is accessed from Alhambra Valley Road via Creekside Oaks. The property slopes up from the street and nearly the entire property supports slopes in excess of 26%. The area and property itself are in a natural setting of native oak trees. The property also has a Restricted Development Area easement that encompasses nearly half of the lot area, and is located along the north, east, and south boundary lines. There is an existing road and driveway that were previously constructed with the creation of the subdivision. General Plan Land Use Designation The subject property is located within an Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan Land Use designation. The purpose of the AL designation is to preserve and protect lands capable of and generally used to produce food, fiber, and plant materials. However, properties located in the Agricultural Lands designation are also permitted for residential use. The approval and recordation of the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision legally established the subject property to be used for residential development. The proposed development necessitating the tree permit is the construction of one single-family residence on the subject property. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the Agricultural Lands designation. The Land Use Element of the County General Plan provides policies for specific geographic areas of the unincorporated County. These specific area policies focus on providing additional policies that pertain to the unique characteristics and needs of each identified area. Pursuant to Figure 3-2 (unincorporated Communities with Adopted Area Policies) of the Land Use Element, the subject property is not located within one of these identified communities. Zoning District: The subject property is located within a General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district. A single-family residence (and the accessory structures and uses normally auxiliary to it) is a permitted use in A-2. The proposed development is the construction of a single-family residence, which is a permitted use that is also consistent with the development standards of A-2. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the intent and purpose of the A-2 zoning district. Project Description: The Applicant requests a tree permit to allow removal of 26 code-protected trees and work within the dripline of 5 code-protected trees for the purpose of constructing a single-family residence on a vacant lot located at 5 Casa de Campo in the unincorporated Martinez area. To allow for the development of the property, the applicant has requested to remove 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (between 8-14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (between 8-26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter). The applicant also requests to remove 5 dead Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) from the property. The proposed residence will be located within the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision and the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan area. County Planning Commission: The requested tree permit was tentatively approved by the County Zoning Administrator on February 18, 2022. A letter of appeal was received on February 28, 2022, from Dan and Sibhan Stokes. The appeal was heard by the County Planning Commission (CPC) on April 27, 2022. The item was continued to June 22, 2022, to allow the Appellants time to have their own arborist report prepared. The Appellants provided an arborist report prepared by certified arborist John Traverso (WE-0206-B) of Traverso Tree Service. After discussing the Traverso arborist report and taking testimony, the CPC denied the appeal and approved the tree permit as recommended by County staff. On July 5, 2022, the Appellants filed an appeal of the CPC’s approval of the tree permit. The main points of the appeal are summarized below, followed by staff’s responses. Appeal Point #1: Five trees slated for removal are Heritage Trees, the removal of which was not properly analyzed under the County’s Heritage Tree Protection Ordinance. Staff Response to Appeal Point #1: The County’s Heritage Tree Protection Ordinance requires that trees designated by the Board of Supervisors as heritage trees may only be removed upon the issuance of a permit. The original Creekside Oak Estates subdivision approval included a Heritage Tree Program that nominated certain listed trees for designation. Five of the trees that the Applicant has requested to remove were nominated under the Program (Trees #293, #4143, #4157, #4197, and #4198). Neither the Appellant nor staff have identified the Board of Supervisors resolution approving the heritage tree designation for any tree nominated under the Program. But assuming the referenced trees were properly designated, the requested tree permit would authorize their removal in accordance with the County’s Heritage Tree Protection Ordinance. The Ordinance authorizes the issuance of a permit to allow the removal of a heritage tree based upon the consideration of enumerated factors, including whether development is prevented as a result of heritage tree protection and preservation. The subject site is constrained significantly by natural hillsides and a recorded scenic easement restricting development. The subdivision established the future development area to be the least impactful, and the road and driveway are already constructed further restricting the feasible development area. Appeal Point #2: The project as approved is not consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan’s Goals, Policies, and Design Regulations. The Appellant cites the following goals and policies: The Environment – Goal #1: Preserve and enhance both the natural and man-made environment in Alhambra Valley.i. Policy 3: Hilltops, ridges, rock outcroppings, mature stands of trees and other natural features shall beii. Policy 3: Hilltops, ridges, rock outcroppings, mature stands of trees and other natural features shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible in the design of new projects. ii. New Development – Goal 1: Allow development in accord with the goals and policies of the Countywide General Plan as it pertains to Alhambra Valley. i. Policy 2: Ensure that the applicable rules for environmental protection are applied to both major and minor subdivisions. ii. Staff Response to Appeal Point #2: The proposed development area was established under the subdivision approval for Creekside Oak Estates. Future development envelopes were identified at the time of subdivision to be least impactful and consistent with the General Plan and Alhambra Valley Specific Plan. See, for example, Figure 2 of the Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan, Creekbank – Riparian Habitat Setback Verification Plan, and Tree Impact Analysis report prepared by W.E.S Technology Corp, dated July 15, 1993. The building site is also dictated by the restricted development area easement. The restricted development area is a product of the Rural Residential Development “Ranchette” policy, a General Plan policy applicable in the Alhambra Valley, as it relates to major subdivisions. The house does follow the natural contours of the hillside while also setting into it to minimize visibility. Its lower level is cut into the hillside to minimize bulk, and it terraces with the uphill slope. There is a second story, but it is setback to keep in scale with the neighboring residences, pursuant to the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan guidelines. Additionally, the grading is only to cut into the hillside and around the building’s footprint to restabilize the hillside. The only fill that is proposed is for the driveway to create vehicular access to the garage. To minimize visibility of the proposed development from Alhambra Valley, the building is tucked into the hillside to reduce the bulk by excavating below grade. The recommended tree permit also includes condition of approval #10(A), requiring a tree replacement plan to assist in screening the building from Alhambra Valley Road. Staff believes the proposed development is respectful of the natural landscape in only proposing tree removal and grading that is necessary to safely construct a single-family residential building on the site, while complying with the subdivision restrictions and the redistricted development area. Appeal Point #3: The project and tree permit do not comply with the conditions of approval for the original Creekside Oaks Estates subdivision, specifically Condition Nos. 3(F), 13, 20(F), 20(H), and 21. Staff Response to Appeal Point #3: 1. Condition No. 3(F) provides that the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision approval was based, in part, on a Tree Impact Analysis prepared by W.E.S Technology Corporation, dated July 15, 1993. Appellants quote from the Analysis that “It is recommended that a certified arborist be contacted during individual lot design to minimize the effects on these trees” and “Tree impacts can be largely reduced through redesign.” The condition does not present any restriction on future development of individual lots. But the Analysis recognizes that a project and site-specific analysis of tree impacts by an arborist should occur. This has occurred under this tree permit application. The Applicant had an arborist report, specific to the proposed development, prepared by certified arborist Robert Peralta (#WE-7150A) of Bob Peralta Arbor Consulting, dated November 3, 2021. The report is based on a site visit conducted on October 31, 2021. Mr. Peralta assessed a total of 36 trees that surround the proposed home site, including 29 Coast Live oaks, 6 Valley oaks, and 1 Bay Laurel. The arborist report identified 5 dead trees that need to be removed before they fail. The report also identified 8 critical trees that are leaning so severely they cannot be safely pruned and recommended these trees for removal. The report also identified additional trees that are in poor condition with poor canopy structure and canopies full of deadwood from the competing trees growing above them. These trees are also recommended for removal before they fail or die off creating fire hazards. Due to their current health condition, the trees identified in the report as critical or poor and that are also located within the grading areas are not anticipated to survive post construction and are recommended for removal. The trees to be removed due to construction of the residence and retaining walls cannot be avoided. However, mitigation measures are feasible to protect during construction the trees identified in the report as being in fair condition. These mitigation measures will be required to be in place throughout the entire construction period. The Tree Impact Analysis cited by the Appellants provided tree protective measures, applicable to tree conditions in 1993, for the grading and construction of overall site improvements, including utility lines, drainage, and roads for the subdivision, that occurred after the final map was recorded for the subdivision. The current arborist report prepared for the proposed development provided tree analysis for the current condition for the onsite trees and protective measures with respect to the “individual lot design” as recommended at the time of subdivision approval. 2. Condition No. 13 provides: The applicant or owner shall submit grading plans for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a grading permit for the purpose of tree preservation. All the mitigations contained in the July 15, 1993 Tree Impact Analysis are mandated. Prior to the submission to the Zoning Administrator, a licensed arborist shall have an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan relative to compliance with required tree preservation measures. This condition of approval was applicable to grading plans and permits necessary for the grading and construction of overall site improvements, including utility lines, drainage, and roads for the subdivision, that occurred after the final map was recorded. The only condition of approval derived from the 1993 Tree Impact Analysis that applies specifically to the future development of the subject site is Condition No. 20(F). 3. Condition No. 20(F) imposes as conditions on the subdivision the recommendations for the 1993 Tree Impact Analysis, including that “The driveway of Lot #3 should parallel the existing roadbed and the Lot #3 site should be moved downhill, out of the major tree mass to the extent feasible.” The grading plans for the driveway of the subject property (Lot #3) were reviewed and approved in 2007 under the compliance review report for the subdivision and building permits BI396988 and BI369455, and were found it to be to be consistent with Condition No. 20(F) as the driveway was shown to run parallel with the existing roadbed. The additional driveway being proposed with the proposed development directly connects to and extends from the end of the existing driveway running east, parallel with what is existing and away from the tree mass. The house site is as downhill as feasible without encroaching into the restricted development area. Additionally, if the house site were shifted north, as requested by the Appellant, this would be going uphill not downhill, and the new portion of the driveway would have to run perpendicular to the existing driveway, in conflict with Condition No. 20(F). This would result in extensive grading and additional impacts. The proposed development complies with Condition No. 20(F) because it is located downhill, away from the major tree mass “to the extent feasible” while avoiding the restricted development area. 4. Condition No. 20(H) imposes as conditions on the subdivision the recommendations for the 1993 Tree Impact Analysis, including that– “For any locations where the road passes close to trees located uphill of the road, retaining structures should be used to minimize impacts of grading on root zone integrity.” This condition of approval is not applicable as no roads are proposed. 5. Condition No. 21 required the subdivider provide for the replacement of trees for every 20 inches of aggregate circumference of trees proposed for removal. This condition of approval is specific to the tree removal done for the grading and overall site improvements (utility lines, drainage, roads, etc.) after the final map was recorded. The required tree replanting specific to that work has already taken place and was verified by County staff prior to releasing the tree bond for the subdivision on August 18, 2010. Appeal Point #4: The proposed development does not comply with the amended map for the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision filed January 25, 2004, including the map’s Grading Plan, Tree Protection Plan, and Tree Schedule, each attached to the appeal. Staff Response to Appeal Point #4: The referenced grading plan and the tree removal schedule and protection plan for the subdivision are specific to the grading and construction of overall site improvements, including utility lines, drainage facilities, and roads, that occurred after the final map was recorded. Individual site development understandably requires site and project specific grading plans, which will include site and project specific tree protection measures. Here, the requested tree permit would require tree protection measures as specified in the project arborist report prepared for the proposed development. Appeal Point #5: The Appellant contends that the project arborist report prepared by Bob Peralta was materially incorrect, creating an insufficient basis to make substantive findings. Appeal Point #5a: The project arborist report failed to identify any trees as heritage trees. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5a: See staff’s response to appeal point #1 above. Appeal Point #5b: The arborist report failed to label some trees, improperly measured other trees, and inadequately analyzed tree grove health in totality as a grove and instead analyzed each tree as an individual. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5b: The Appellant’s report stated, “It is [certified arborist John Traverso’s] opinion that the [project] arborist looked at each tree individually and not as being a part of a grove. This would reduce both their health and structural ratings.” Staff recognizes that the two arborists assessed the trees using different methodologies. Staff acknowledges that this may result in differing opinions amongst qualified professionals, but does not find it a sufficient basis to discount the findings of the project arborist report. Appeal Point #5bi: Deed Recorded Heritage Tree #293 was listed in the Arborist report as a 19” tree in critical health. This tree, in the 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey was denoted as multi-stemmed, in good condition with a 4 out of 5 health rating, and had primary trunk diameters of 28” and 27” inches. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey health status was affirmed August 18, 2010 under the compliance review for Tree Bond Release – Subject SD907609. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5bi: A 2003 tree survey, even if reaffirmed in 2010, is not relevant to the current health status of the tree, and does not invalidate the health status finding in the current project arborist report. Appeal Point #5bii: Deed Recorded Heritage Tree #4157 was listed in the Arborist report as poor health with diameters of 30” and 28”. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey was denoted as Good health, with a 4 out of 5 health rating and trunk diameters multi-stemmed trunk diameters of 21”, 20,”,18”, and 5”. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey health status was affirmed August 18, 2010 under the compliance review for Tree Bond Release – Subject SD907609. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5bii: A 2003 tree survey, even if reaffirmed in 2010, is not relevant to the current health status of the tree, and does not invalidate the health status finding in the current project arborist report. Appeal Point #5biii: Tree #4198 was listed as being dead, when it is in fact alive. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5biii : The appellant arborist report found tree #4198 to be in “fairly good condition”. Staff is not an expert in the field, so the difference in health assessment of tree #4198 is a matter of a difference in professional opinion. However, it is worth noting that the other four trees the project arborist report found to be dead the appellant arborist report agreed. Appeal Point #5biiii: Tree #2770 was listed as a 30” oak, and is actually 11”. Staff Response to Appeal Point #5biiii: The indicated tree trunk diameter may or may not be an oversight, but the project arborist report does depict the correct location of tree #2770. Appellant Arborist Report: The Appellant provided a counter arborist report prepared by certified arborist John Traverso (WE-0206-B) of Traverso Tree Service, dated June 6, 2022. The Appellant’s arborist report disputed several of the findings in the project arborist report. Mr. Traverso found tree #293 to be healthy, while Mr. Peralta found it to be in critical condition. Mr. Traverso found tree #4198 to be in “fairly good health”, while Mr. Peralta found it dead. As stated earlier, the two arborists assessed the trees using different methodologies. Staff acknowledges the difference in professional opinion, but does not find it a sufficient basis to discount the findings of the project arborist report. Lastly, Mr. Traverso believes that 6 trees could be saved if the building footprint was moved and the grading reduced. As described above, the proposed development area cannot be feasibly moved further outside of the “tree mass”. The processing of the subdivision application that created the subject lot, took retaining the natural landscape into consideration, and designed prospective building sites accordingly with the inclusion of the restricted development easement areas. Though the subject property is 5.6 acres, the actual developable area is only approximately 2 acres as a result of the scenic development easement area, and with the amount of trees on the property and it being a hillside development is further limited. The subdivision established the area where the house is proposed to be the least impactful with the recording of the restricted development area easement and the road design. Also, the road and driveway were already constructed with the creation of the subdivision, so the house site is already predetermined. This development (building, structures, and grading) is outside the restricted development area and at the end of the already constructed road, resulting in the least amount of grading and tree removal. The house cannot be feasibly located elsewhere. Additionally, there is a retaining wall proposed to run along the back of the building in the tree mass to provide pedestrian access to the rear of the site per Fire code that the appellant arborist report did not consider. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If Board of Supervisors grants the appeal, the requested tree permit would be denied. The proposed development of a single-family residence on the subject property could not proceed, and the property would remain undeveloped. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Presentation from legal representative for Mr. and Mrs. Dan and Sibhan Stokes, Vince Moita. Presentation by David Viggiano, USGO Land LLC, project architect. Speakers: Leslie Ries, Alhambra Valley Improvement Association; Todd Kilbourne; Jay Howard; No name given. Written commentary received from: Kenric and Billie Fivella; Delores White; Jamie & Mike Menasco; Marell & Mike Jones; Dave Silva and Leslie Walsh; Gary Thompson and Carol Arnold; Vickie Dawes (attached). AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Findings and Conditions of Approval Maps Project Plans Project Arborist Report Site Photos Appeal Letter Appellant's Arborist Report Planning Commission Staff Reports Staff Presentation MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Appellant Presentation Correspondence Received 1 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076; David Viggiano (Applicant) and USGL Land, LLC (Property Owner). I. FINDINGS A. Growth Management Performance Standards 1.Traffic: The project is to construct a new single-family residence on a vacant lot. Policy 4-c under the Growth Management Program (GMP) requires a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more AM or PM peak-hour trips. The addition of a new single-family residence on Casa de Campo will not generate more than 100 hour traffic trips to and from the project site. Therefore, a traffic impact analysis is not required. 2.Water: The GMP requires new development to demonstrate that adequate water quantity and quality can be provided. New water service is required to accommodate the project. The property is located within the City of Martinez water service area. The City of Martinez must file an “out of service” application with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the subject property to receive water service. 3.Sanitary Sewer: The GMP requires that new development demonstrate that adequate sanitary sewer quantity and quality can be provided. The subject property currently receives sanitary sewer service from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. The construction of one single-family residence in a legally recorded subdivision area is not anticipated to increase the demand for sanitary sewer service to an unmanageable level for the existing wastewater system. The project requires Central Sanitary review and approval to be able to connect to the public sewer system. 4.Fire Protection: The fire protection standards under the GMP require that a fire station be within one and one-half miles of development in urban, suburban and central business district areas, or requires that automatic fire sprinkler systems be installed to satisfy this standard. The project site is within the Contra Costa Fire Protection District jurisdiction. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Fire District to ensure proper emergency apparatus access roadways, adequate and reliable water supply, and that the new residence be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 5.Public Protection: Public protection standards under the GMP require that a Sheriff Facility standard of 155 square feet of station area and support facilities 2 per 1,000 in population shall be maintained within the unincorporated area of the County. The project is in fill development in an already established subdivision and populated area. The addition of one single-family residence to an already urbanized neighborhood will not increase the demand for police service facilities as the project will not significantly increase in population. 6.Parks & Recreation: Parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. The project will not significantly increase the demand for parks or recreation facilities, as the project will not significantly increase the housing stock in the County. To mitigate the minor increase in demand for parks created by the project, the applicant will be required to pay a park dedication fee at the time of building permit issuance for the new single-family residence, as is required by Section 920-6 (Standards for Area and Fees) of the County ordinance. 7.Flood Control & Drainage: No portion of the subject property is located within a 100-year flood area as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. In addition, the project does not involve the removal, construction, or alteration of any dams or levees within the County. Also, Grading Inspection will conduct drainage review to verify compliancy with Stormwater C.3 Standards. B. Tree Permit Findings Required Factors for Granting Permit. The Zoning Administrator is satisfied that the following factors as provided by County Code Section 816-6.8010 (A) and (G) for granting a Tree Permit have been satisfied as follows: 1.816-6.8010(A): The arborist report indicates that the tree is in poor health and cannot be saved. Staff Response: The arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) of Bob Peralta’s Consulting Arborists dated November 3, 2021, indicates that 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) are dead and cannot be saved. 2.816-6.8010(G): Reasonable development of the property would require the alteration or removal of the tree and this development could not be reasonably accommodated on another area of the lot. Staff Response: New single-family residential development of a vacant lot that requires removal of 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (8, 14, and 14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live 3 Oaks (8, 20, and 26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter), and could not be reasonably accommodated on another area of the lot. The subdivision established this area to be the least impactful when constructing a residence with the recording of the Restricted Development Area. Also, the road and driveway were already constructed with the creation of the subdivision, so the house site is already predetermined. This development is outside the Restricted Development Area and at the end of the already constructed driveway, resulting in the least amount of grading and tree removal. C. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings The project is categorically exempt under Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures: Construction of one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. The project is to construct a single-family residence on a legal lot in an agriculturally zoned area where a single-family residence is a permitted use. There is tree removal and work within the dripline in order to construct the building, but this Tree Permit mitigates this potential impact with Best Management Practices to be executed during construction and protective fencing to be up along the trees’ driplines throughout construction, as described in the approved arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150), and tree replanting during the landscaping phase of this project. II.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076: Project Approval 1.This application for a Tree Permit and Alhambra Valley Design Review to allow removal of 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (8, 14, and 14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (8, 20, and 26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter) to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot, and to remove 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) because they are dead, is APPROVED by the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD). 4 2.This application for a Tree Permit is approved based on the following documents: •Application materials and project plans submitted on November 30, 2021; •Additional materials submitted on January 25, 2022; and •Arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) of Bob Peralta’s Consulting Arborists dated November 3, 2021. Payment of Fees 3.This Tree Permit application was subject to an initial deposit of $3,000.00. The application is subject to time and material costs if the application review expenses exceed the initial deposit. Any additional fee due must be paid prior to submittal of a building permit, or 60 days of the effective date of this permit, whichever occurs first. The fees include costs through permit issuance and final file preparation. Pursuant to Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Resolution Number 2019/553, where a fee payment is over 60 days past due, the Department of Conservation and Development may seek a court judgement against the applicant and will charge interest at a rate of ten percent (10%) from the date of judgement. The applicant may obtain current costs by contacting the project planner. Tree Protection 4.Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils, or dumping of paint or poisonous materials on or around trees and roots is prohibited. 5.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the tree protective fencing as described in the approved arborist report shall be installed onsite. Color photographs of the installed fencing shall be submitted to CDD staff as evidence that this condition has been satisfied. 6.If the tree protective fencing needs to be temporarily moved for construction purposes, once the work is complete, the tree protective fencing shall be put back to its original state. 7.The applicant shall immediately notify CDD staff of any damage that occurs to any tree during construction. Any tree not approved for destruction or removal that dies or is significantly damaged as a result of this project shall be replaced with a tree or trees of equivalent size and of a species as approved by the CDD to be reasonably appropriate for the situation. 5 8.If project site grading, construction, tree removal, or site clearance will take place during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a nesting survey shall be conducted on the project site and within a zone of influence around the project site within 5 days of the initiation of the activities listed above. The zone of influence includes those areas off the project site where birds could be disturbed by earth-moving vibrations or noise. If nesting birds are found, then no work shall be initiated until nest-specific buffers have been established by the qualified biologist. The buffer area(s) shall be fenced off from work activities and avoided until the young have fledged, as determined by the qualified biologist. Active nests within or adjacent to the project site shall be monitored by the qualified biologist daily throughout the duration of project activities for changes in bird behavior or signs of distress related to project activities. If nesting birds are showing signs of distress or disruptions to nesting, then that nest shall have the buffer immediately increased by the qualified biologist until no further interruptions to breeding behavior are detectable. Related Tree Activities/Removal Best Management Practices (BMPs) 9.The following tree related BMPs shall be implemented during project construction and shall be present on the site plan for building permit(s) as construction notes: •If needed, pruning shall adhere to ISA and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standards and Best Management Practices. •Should tree dripline encroachment be necessary, the contractor shall contact the project arborist for consultation and recommendations. •Should any damage to the trees occur, the contractor shall promptly notify the project arborist to appropriately address the damage. •If roots > 2” in diameter are encountered during trenching, grading and/or excavation, consult the project arborist for recommendations. If appropriate, roots shall be cleanly pruned with a handsaw or sawzall, immediately covered, and kept moist till backfilled. Restitution for Tree Removal 10.The following measures are intended to provide restitution for the removal of 26 code-protected trees: 6 A. Tree Replacement Plan: Prior to submittal of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Tree Replacement Plan prepared by a licensed arborist or landscape architect for the review and approval of CDD. The Plan shall provide for the planting of at least 10 indigenous oak trees, minimum 15- gallons in size. The Plan shall assist in screening the new residence from Alhambra Valley Road and 130 Oak Bridge Lane. The Plan shall be implemented prior to requesting a final inspection. B. Required Security to Assure Completion of Plan Improvements: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit) that is acceptable to CDD to ensure that the Tree Replacement Plan is implemented. Determination of Security Amount: The security shall provide for a breakdown of all of the following costs: •A labor and materials estimate for planting the 10 indigenous oak trees, minimum 15-gallons in size, and related irrigation improvements that may be required, prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor. •An additional 20% of the total of the above amounts to address inflation costs. C. Initial Deposit for Processing of Security: The County ordinance requires that the applicant pay fees to cover all staff time and material costs of staff for processing the landscape improvement security. At the time of submittal of the security, the applicant shall pay an initial deposit of $200. D. Duration of Security: The security bond for each lot shall be retained by the County for a minimum of 12 months up to 24 months following final building inspection. A prerequisite of releasing the bond between 12 and 24 months shall be to have the applicant arrange for the consulting arborist to inspect the trees and to prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event that CDD determines that the tree(s) intended to be protected has been damaged, and CDD determines that the applicant has not been diligent in providing reasonable restitution, then CDD may require that all part of the security be used depending on the extent of the damage to the tree(s). 7 11.Tree removal associated with development shall occur only with an approved grading or building permit. Contingency Restitution for Work within the Dripline 12.Pursuant to the requirements of Section 816-6.1204 of the Tree Protection and Preservation Ordinance, to address the possibility that construction activity nevertheless damages the tree(s) where work is within their dripline, the applicant shall provide the County with a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit) to be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, to allow for replacement of the tree(s) intended to be preserved that are significantly damaged by construction activity. The security shall be based on: A. Extent of Possible Restitution Improvements: The planting of up to 5 indigenous oak trees, 15-gallons in size, in the vicinity of the affected tree(s), or equivalent planting contribution, subject to prior review and approval of CDD. B. Determination of Security Amount: The security shall provide for a breakdown of all of the following costs: •Preparation of a landscape/irrigation plan by a licensed landscape architect or arborist. •A labor and materials estimate for planting 5 indigenous oak trees, 15- gallons in size, and related irrigation improvements that may be required, prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor. •An additional 20% of the total of the above amounts to address inflation costs. C. Acceptance of Security: The security shall be subject to review and approval of CDD. The County ordinance requires that the applicant pay fees for all staff time and material costs associated with processing a tree protection security. The applicant shall pay an initial fee deposit of $200 at time of submittal of a security. D. Duration of Security: The security shall be retained by the County for a minimum of 12 months and up to 24 months following completion of work within the trees’ dripline. A prerequisite of releasing the bond prior to 24 months shall be to have the applicant arrange for a consulting arborist to inspect the tree(s) and prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event that CDD determines that any of the trees intended to be preserved have been damaged by development activity, and CDD determines that the applicant has not been diligent in providing restitution of the 8 damaged tree(s), then CDD may require that all or part of the security be used depending on the extent of the damage to the tree(s). Alhambra Valley Specific Plan 13.The approved color and material board shall remain the same and be present on the elevation plans for building permit(s). If any color or material choices are changed after this approval, the applicant/property owner must first obtain approval from CDD staff. Prior to final building inspection, as-built color photographs of the residence shall be submitted to CDD staff as evidence that this condition has been satisfied. 14.Fences – Fences shall be designed and located so that they do not block vehicle and pedestrian sightlines and so that they are compatible with the design of the residential building and are aesthetically attractive. a.New fencing up to 4-feet in height is allowed at the front property boundary and within the front yard setback. Fencing shall be open-rail or wire. b.Solid board fencing along side and rear property boundaries are to be discouraged in cases where an agricultural use is adjacent to proposed development; fencing on slopes greater than 15% shall be open-rail or wire. Barbed wire may be used to keep grazing animals contained. 15.Exterior Lighting – Both construction and permanent exterior lighting should be designed to eliminate glare. Lighting shall be shielded and directed downward. Lamps shall be low wattage and have an incandescent light color. 16.Drought-Tolerant Landscaping – Landscaping shall comply with the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Turf areas shall be restricted to a maximum of 25% of the total planting area. 17.Public Utilities – all new utilities shall be placed underground. Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) 18.Prior to issuance of a building permit, a completed WELO Part I shall be submitted to CDD staff for review and approval. The approved Landscaping Plans under WELO Part I shall be present in the construction plan set for a building permit. 19.Prior to final building inspection, a completed WELO Part II – Certificate of Completion (attached) shall be submitted to CDD staff for review and approval. 9 20.The landscaping plan shall be compliant with the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or County Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever ordinance applies. Construction Period Restrictions and Requirements Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following construction related BMPs shall be implemented during the tree related activities and during project construction and shall be present on the site plan for building permit(s) as construction notes: 21.Unless specifically approved otherwise via prior authorization from the Zoning Administrator, all construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on state and federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the state or federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) President’s Day (State) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Juneteenth National Independence Holiday (Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For information on the actual days and dates that these holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal: http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/k8.htm State: http://www.sos.ca.gov/holidays.htm a.The site shall be maintained in an orderly fashion. Following the cessation of construction activity, all construction debris shall be removed from the site. b.The project sponsor shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and 10 shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors and concrete pumps as far away from sensitive receptors as possible. c.The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to avoid interference with existing neighborhood traffic flows. d.Transporting of heavy equipment and trucks shall be limited to the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and is prohibited on state and federal holidays. e.Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is prohibited. ADVISORY NOTES ADVISORY NOTES ARE NOT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; THEY ARE PROVIDED TO ALERT THE APPLICANT TO ADDITIONAL ORDINANCES, STATUTES, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. A. NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, ASSESSMENTS, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the applicant has the opportunity to protest fees, dedications, reservations or exactions required as part of this project approval. To be valid, a protest must be in writing pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 and must be delivered to the Community Development Division within a 90-day period that begins on the date that this project is approved. If the 90th day falls on a day that the Community Development Division is closed, then the protest must be submitted by the end of the next business day. B. Additional requirements may be imposed by the following agencies: •Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division •Contra Costa County Public Works Department •Contra Costa Fire Protection District •Central Contra Costa Sanitary District •Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Prior to applying for a building permit, the applicant is strongly encouraged to contact these agencies. TP21-0076 CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:9,028 Notes0.30.14 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.3 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. General Plan: Agricultural Lands (AL) City Limits General Plan SV (Single Family Residential - Very Low) SL (Single Family Residential - Low) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) SH (Single Family Residential - High) ML (Multiple Family Residential - Low) MM (Multiple Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) MV (Multiple Family Residential - Very High) MS (Multiple Family Residential - Very High Special) CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) MO (Mobile Home) M-1 (Parker Avenue Mixed Use) M-2 (Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use) M-3 (Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use) M-4 (Willow Pass Road Mixed Use) M-5 (Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use) M-6 (Bay Point Residential Mixed Use) M-7 (Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Mixed Use) M-8 (Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed Use) M-9 (Montalvin Manor Mixed Use) M-10 (Willow Pass Business Park Mixed Use) M-11 (Appian Way Mixed Use) M-12 (Triangle Area Mixed Use) M-13 (San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use) M-14 (Heritage Mixed Use) CO (Commercial) OF (Office) BP (Business Park) LI (Light Industry) HI (Heavy Industry) AL, OIBA (Agricultural Lands & Off Island Bonus Area) CR (Commercial Recreation) ACO (Airport Commercial) LF (Landfill) PS (Public/Semi-Public) PR (Parks and Recreation) OS (Open Space) AL (Agricultural Lands) AC (Agricultural Core) DR (Delta Recreation) WA (Water) WS (Watershed) Assessment Parcels CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:9,028 Notes0.30.14 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.3 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Zoning: General Agricultural (A-2) City Limits Zoning R-6 (Single Family Residential) R-6, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-6 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) R-6 -TOV -K (Tree Obstruction and Kensington) R-6, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-6 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-7 (Single Family Residential) R-7 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-10 (Single Family Residential) R-10, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) R-20 (Single Family Residential) R-20, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-40 (Single Family Residential) R-40, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-40, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-65 (Single Family Residential) R-100 (Single Family Residential) D-1 (Two Family Residential) D-1 -T (Transitional Combining District) D-1, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) M-12 (Multiple Family Residential) M-12 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) M-17 (Multiple Family Residential) M-29 (Multiple Family Residential) F-R (Forestry Recreational) F-R -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) F-1 (Water Recreational) F-1 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2 (General Agriculture) A-2, -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-2, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) A-2, -SG (Solar Energy Generation Combining District) A-2 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) A-3 (Heavy Agriculture) A-3 -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-3, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-3 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-3, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:2,257 Notes0.10.04 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Aerial Photo City Limits Streets Building Outlines Assessment Parcels World Imagery Low Resolution 15m Imagery High Resolution 60cm Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Citations TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017COVER SHEETA1.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.NEW HOMEGARAGERESIDENCE LEVEL-1TYPE V-B - THREE STORYFIRE-SPRINKLEREDR-3 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE)U (GARAGE)(LOT SIZE: 67,736 S.F.)----1620 S.F.6.7%875 S.F.1530 S.F.5675 S.F.4566 S.F.------RESIDENCE LEVEL-22946 S.F.GENERAL BUILDING NOTESDRAWING DATA CONTAINED HEREIN IS AS EXACT AS COULD BE DETERMINEDWITHIN THE PROJECT DESIGNER'S DESIGN SCOPE OF SERVICES RENDERED.AS SUCH THE ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF THE DESIGN DATA IS NOTGUARANTEED. THE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR, GENERALCONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN,VERIFY AND CONFIRM EXACT DESIGN DATA ON SITE AND SUITABLY ADAPTTHE WORK TO CONFORM TO EXACT CONDITIONS ON SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DESIGN DATA AMBIGUITIES ORDISCREPANCIES CONTAINED IN THE CONTRACT TO THE OWNER IN WRITING.ALL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO ADAPT THE WORK SHALL BE MADE BYTHE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND ACTUALBUILDING MEASUREMENTS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRAWING INFORMATION.SPECIFIC TRADE NAMES MENTIONED IN THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR THEPURPOSES OF ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS OF QUALITY, STYLE ORTYPE, AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT SUBSTITUTIONS. ALLSUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER INWRITING WITHIN A SUFFICIENT TIME FRAME AS NOT TO DELAY PROJECTCOMPLETION.SUBSTITUTIONS FOR SPECIFIED MATERIALS:4.013.02THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PLANREVIEW, PERMIT, LICENSE, AND INSPECTION APPROVALS. ALL FEESREQUIRED FOR APPROVAL SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNER.PERMITS, LICENSES, INSPECTIONS AND FEES:DATA AND MEASUREMENTS:3.012.01PRIOR TO CONTRACT APPROVAL, THE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR,GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE PROJECTSITE, AND BY THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION, DETERMINE EXISTING SITECONDITIONS AS TO THE QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS, LABOR HOURS, AND ANYOTHER COST ASSOCIATED WITH WORK THAT IS TO BE DONE UNDER THEIRCONTRACT AND AS REQUIRED TO PASS ALL BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTIONS.ALL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE INSPECTION AUTHORITY SHALL BEMADE BY EACH SUBCONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:1.013.03DIMENSIONS TO DOORS, WINDOWS, AND OPENINGS ARE NOMINAL WIDTHS.REFER TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR ACTUAL ROUGH OPENINGS, FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD. ALL DOORS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION ON PLAN OR DETAIL SHALL BE 3 INCHES FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF NEAREST DOOR BUCK OR CENTERED ON ROOM.3.04ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE ACTUALWALL FINISH DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AND ARE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS TODETERMINE PROPER CLEARANCES.LOT COVERAGE:TOTAL UNCONDITIONED AREA:TOTAL CONDITIONED AREA:% LOT COVERAGE:BUILDING SHEET ABBREVIATIONSPROJECT VICINITY MAPBUILDING AREASTRUCTURALSHELF & POLEBMBEAMCLEAREQUALELEVATIONDISH WASHERDOUGLAS FIRDOORDIAMETERCONTINUOUSCONCRETEDOUBLECLOSETCENTERLINECERAMICCEILINGCEMENTBLOCKINGBOARDCONTROL JOINTDRAIN INLETCLEANOUTEQELCLOEDWDRDIADIEASTCONCCONTINDBLDFCOCLGCLRCERCJBLKGBRDCEMSTRUCTS&PMEDICINE CABINETMINIMUMMANUFACTURERMAXIMUMHOSE BIBBLAVATORYHIGH OR HEIGHTGALVANIZEDLAVMTLMCMINMETALLTMAXMANFLINLBLIGHTLINENPOUNDHBJTSGYPHJOISTGYPSUMGALVGL GLASSSLDSIMPSIMSHTHGSHWR'SIMPSON'SLIDINGSIMILARSHEATHINGSHOWERALUMINUMANCHOR BOLTADJACENTALUMABADJBOWBOTTOM OF WALLCLCENTER TO CENTERCCPROPOSEDSPACEREFERENCE NORTHPROJECT DATAAPPLICABLE BUILDING CODE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:CONSTRUCTION TYPE:2019 CBC, CRC, CEC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CEC (ENERGY CODE), CFC, & CGBCFPFFFLUORFIXFIRE PLACEFLUORESCENTFINISH FLOORFIXTUREGFCIGAGROUND FAULT INTERRUPTERGAUGEOFCINOCO/ON CENTEROWNER FURNISHEDCONTRACTOR INSTALLEDNORTHOVERPBPLPHPUSH BUTTONPHONEPLATERREFPTPOCREFRIGERATORPRESSURE TREATEDPOINT OF CONNECTIONRISERSRWDRMREINF REINFORCEDSOUTHREDWOODROOMSFSBSQUARE FOOTSET BACKTOGTVUCRTYPTOSTTOCTEMPTOFTOPTOWWCWDW/WWHWWMWPTOP OF GRADETOP OF SLABTYPICALTELEVISIONTOP OF CONCRETETEMPEREDTREADTOP OF FLOORTOP OF PAVEMENTTOP OF WALLUNDER COUNTER REFRIG.WATER CLOSETWOODWESTWITHWELDED WIRE MESHWATER PROOFWATER HEATERPROJECT TEAMPROJECT SCOPEDESIGNER:USGL LAND,LLC1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSULTANT:TRUSS DESIGN:CIVIL ENGINEER:FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN:PROJECT LOCATION:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553APN:367-140-017NEW HOME:RESIDENCE5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553APN:367-140-0173.05INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.A1.11 COVER SHEETA2.11 SITE PLANA2.12 ENLARGED SITE PLANA3.00 LEGENDS AND KEYNOTESA3.11 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -LOWER LEVEL 1A3.21 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -MAIN LEVEL 2A3.31 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -ADU LEVEL 3A4.11 SCHEDULESA6.11 PROPOSED ROOF PLANA7.00 PERSPECTIVE VIEWSA7.11 ELEVATIONS EXTERIORA7.21 ELEVATIONS EXTERIORA8.11 SECTIONSA9.11 DETAILSAE0 UTILITY KEYNOTES ANDLEGENDAE1 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 1AE2 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 2AE3 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 3AG1 CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTSAG2 CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTSSHEET INDEXRESIDENCE LEVEL-31199 S.F.DECKS AND PATIO AT LEVEL-2745 S.F. UPA270+268266REMOVEREMOVEREMOVEPRUNE/POTENTIAL REMOVALREMOVEPRUNE/POTENTIAL REMOVALREMOVE286292288288286284282290WM WM WM WWWWWWB.O.B.O.A8"∅ SS8"∅ SS2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS8"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS50100267.845DI50101267.870DI50102267.880DI#31211" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3158" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#70827", 16" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#76619" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#70613" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#70711" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=1#7098", 5" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=0 #31311" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3149" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#31617" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3 #50125", 22" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#317/50211" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=3#318/50317" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#50415", 15" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#50520", 19"COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#31921" DIACOAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=0#32019" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#32213" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#32318" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=4#32414" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3257" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#32622" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32717" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32819" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32911" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33015" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33116" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33213" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33340" MONTEREY PINESUITABILITY=3#33411", 9", & 9" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#3359" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#59329", 19" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=4#50610" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=3#50825" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#336/50710" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#337/71113", 6" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#338/71022" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3398" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=3#71318" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#71222" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=0#76423" COAST LIVE OAK/0#341/120059",6",4" CALIFORNIA BAY/0#34016" COAST LIVE OAK/3#34221" COAST LIVE OAK/1#34311", 8" COAST LIVE OAK/2#34421" COAST LIVE OAK/4#34518" COAST LIVE OAK/4#34611" CALIFORNIA BAY/3#34722" CALIFORNIA BAY/3#34813" COAST LIVE OAK/2#996811" COAST LIVE OAK/0#99699",6",5",4" CALIFORNIA BAY/2#34912" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35019" COAST LIVE OAK/3#3518" COAST LIVE OAK/3#997019" COAST LIVE OAK/3#35212" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35424" COAST LIVE OAK/4#3538" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35515" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35615" COAST LIVE OAK/3#3579" COAST LIVE OAK/2#99587", 4" BAY/0#995316", 13"COAST LIVE OAK/3#35819",13" COASTLIVE OAK/3#364/995417" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36016" COAST LIVE OAK/0#36117" COAST LIVE OAK/2#36317" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36210" COAST LIVE OAK/2# 995716" COASTLIVE OAK/3# 3599" COASTLIVE OAK/2#995511" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36720" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36623" COAST LIVE OAK/3#994919" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995620" VALLEY OAK/4#365/995018", 11"COAST LIVE OAK/3#995216", 11" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995113" COAST LIVE OAK/2SDMIGR=267.85'8' INV NE 257.85 APPROXEX. 2" DIA SSEX. 2" DIA SSINV=265.2'EX. SSLATERAL342341/12005343344345346347349348350351352353354356355357358360359361362363367366369370371372373/20132011374/435375/434376/433378335333334332331330329328327326339325324322323320319313314315316312337/7113409949365/9950318/503317/5029968379/2009766706707708709501336/507508506593504505713338/71071299699970995899539957364/99549955995199529956994099399938993799419922368/172994399422003200420022001200720082006200520142012377/43024499543643720154274284297644324312702702802 7 0 2702902802902703402603302802902703103303203403302902802903103 2 0 330 2702802903202803103002602 7 0 270270280280290270270290290286282292260280270260250270280270292288286284282278276284286288292294338272274292288286284282278276328338266332328326324322318316314312310308306304302300298334336338342344346336326328296296294294340342344348292288286284282278276284286288292294332334 334346 284286288326324322318316314312282276272274278308306304302298296294292294292290288286270268268264266262266262258256254252248264268258256262264266268260270270260250270260260340330320310300290280270260250300290280270260250240290300310290280270260250310300290280270320330340330320340350330350320310300271.93272.52GS271.42EP270.81EP271.10EP271.10EP270.60EP269.8135034035635035640092272.516Bs/chk3000040093295.132FS/CHK4008440094291.969GB40095292.207GB40096292.038GB40097285.436GB40098283.618GB40099281.195GB40100277.750GB40101273.149GB40102277.747GB40103280.473GB40104286.714GB40105295.828GB40106296.338GB40107295.286GB40108293.782GB40109292.194GB40110285.584GB40111288.620GB40112289.648GB40113289.437GB40114286.572GB40115286.882GB40116286.633GB40117280.437GB40118281.366GB40119279.761GB40120277.020GB40121275.088GB40122279.313GB40123284.961GB40124286.897GB40125287.640GS40126287.500GS40127289.029GS40128290.864GS40129292.202GS40130292.850GS40131291.719GS40132273.989EP40133277.569EP40134282.234EP40135286.296EP40136291.207EP40137293.626EP40138294.804EP40139296.192EP40140296.771EP40141296.996EP40142296.950EP40143294.715EP40144292.217EP40145286.972EP40146285.622EP40147282.827EP40148280.319EP40149273.748EP40150271.936EP40151271.138EP40152272.422EP40153280.257EP40154282.581EP40155285.850EP40156288.248EP40157289.882EP40158292.898EP40159294.377EP40160294.945EP40161296.991EP40162297.168EP40163294.448EP40164290.367EP40165285.502EP40166282.072EP40167278.994EP40168276.531EP40169274.169EP40170272.438Bs/chk3000040171278.396FS/CHK4000140172268.911GB40173269.024GB40174269.922GB40175269.852GB40176269.061GB40177268.016GB40178268.518GB40179268.928GB40180268.767GB40181268.793GB40182268.717GB40183270.926GB40184271.188GB40187272.164GB40188271.607GS40190271.794GS40191271.472GS40192271.221GS40193270.383GS40194269.956GS40195268.661GS40196269.058GS40197269.106GS40198269.151GS40199269.103GS40200268.760GS40201269.985GS40202271.207GS40203271.059EP40207271.350EP40208271.394EP40209271.602EP40210271.530EP40211271.244EP40212271.183EP40213271.032EP40214270.429EP40215269.806EP40216269.296EP40217269.181EP40218269.098EP40219269.112EP40220269.546EP40221271.188EP40222274.585EP40223276.776EP40224276.326EP40225273.195EP40226270.221EP40227268.407EP40228268.237EP40229269.178EP40230269.530EP40231270.130EP40232270.450EP40233270.732EP40234271.061EP40235271.222EP40236271.512EP40237271.055EP40238270.809EP40239270.722EP40242269.658EP40243270.303EP40246272.327EP40247271.860BS/CHK 3001340248264.342GS40249269.708GS40250276.869CONCL40251278.848CONCL40252280.098CONCL40253281.258CONCL40254282.693CONCL40255284.385CONCL40256287.845CONCL40257290.773CONCL40258293.766CONCL40259298.699CONCL40260298.370TC40261294.402TC40262288.643TC40263282.532TC40264280.476TC40265277.901TC40266279.271TC40267276.782TC40268280.542GB40269286.853GB40270290.770GB40271295.524GB40272300.149GB40273295.097GS40274293.994GS40275291.173GS40276286.874GS40277278.193GB40278276.907GB#9909JOINT TRENCHJOINT TRENCHUNIDENTIFIED UTEND OFSIGNALJOINT TRENCH24i n CMPSDCB12in.SDUP+RISERSUP+RISERSGPUP+RISERSGAS-3.0dGAS-2.1dGAS 2.1 DEEPGAS-2.2dOBW ZONE III 12in PVC WATER (N/L)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)CLOSED VALVESBLOWOFF6in AC WATER (T/W)WSWSWSWSDWDWDWDWEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP#2710#2711#2712#2713#2714#2715#2716#2717#2718#2719#2720#2721#2722#2723#2725#2724#2726#2727#2728#2729#2730#2731#2732#2733#2734#2735#2736#2737#2738#2739#2740#2741#2742#2743#2745#2746#2744#2747#2748#2749#2750#2751#2752#2754#2753#2755#2756#2757#2758#2759#2760#2761#2762#2763#2764#2765#2766#2767#2768#2769#2770#2771#2772#2773#2774#2775#2776#2777#2778#2779#2780#2781#2782#2783#2784#2785#2786#2787#2788#2789#2790#2791#2792#2793BLDG A AREA=2228.57 SFBLDG b AREA=322.30 SF5.5' WOOD 3-RAIL FENCE5.5' WOOD 3-RAI L FENCEBARB WIRE FENCEBARB WIRE FENCEBARB WIRE FENCE#16#17#19#20#_____#4989#4997#4999#4996#4995#4985#427#428#429#430#431#432#24#433#434#435#436#437#25#438#490#489#491#4385#4386#4387#4388#4389#483#484#485#486#487#488#492#493#494#495#496#497#9910#9911#9912#9913#9914#9915#9916#9917#9918#9919#9920#9921#9922#30#9926#9927#9928#29#9924#9925#319923#9929#9930#9931#9932#9933#9934#9935#9936#9937#9938#9939#9940#9941#9942#9943#9944#9945#9946#9947#9948#9949#9950#9951#9952#9953#9954#9955#9956#9957#9958#9959#9960#9961#9962#9963#9965#9966#763#9968#9969#9970#9971#4986#4993#4492#22#5000#9972#9973#9974#9975#9976#9977#9978#9979#9980#9981#232#236#246#259#247#280#256#234#270#293#292#4143#4147#4149#4158#4162#4163#4164#4165#4176#4177#4178#4179#4180#4181#4182#4186#4156#4150#4154#4155#4187#4188#4189#4190#4191#4192#4193#4194#4195#4196#4197#4198#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#506#507#508#501#502#503#504#505#764#765#766#742#743#744#745#746#747#748#749#750#751#752#753#754#755#756#757#758#759#760#761#762#40#41#701#702#703#704#705#706#707#708#709#710#711#712#713#714#715#716#717#718#719#32#720#721#722#723#724#725#726#727#728#729#730#731#732#733#734#735#736#737#738#739#740#741#510#511#512#513#514#515#516#517#518#519#520#509#521#522#523#524#525#526#527#528#529#530#531#532#533#534#535#37#536#537#538#539#540#541#542#543#544#545#546#547#548#549#550#551#552#553#554#555#556#557#558#559#560#561#562#563#564#565#566#567#568#569#570#36#571#35#572#573#574#575#576#577#578#579#580#581#582#583#584#34#585#586#587#588#589#590#591#592#593#4992#841#842#843#844#845#846#847#848#849#850#851#852#854#855#856#857#858#859#860#861#862#863#864#865#866#867#868#869#870#871#872#873#874#875#876#877#878#973#974#931#932#933#934#935#936#937#938#939#940#941#942#946#947#948#949#950#951#952#953#954#955#956#957#958#959#960#961#962#963#964#965#966#967#968#4910#4911#4912#4913#4914#4915#4916#4917#4918#4919#4922#4923#4924#4925#4926#4927#4928#4929#4930#4931#4920#4921#2015#2013#2014#2012#436#437#2010#2011#2001#2002#2003#2004#2005#2006#2007#2008#2009#2017#2019#2020#2021#2022#2023#2024#2025#2026#2027#2032#2033#2034#2035#2036#2037#2038#2039#2040#2041#2042#2043#2044#2045#2046#2047#2048#2049#2050#2051#2052#2053#2054#2055#2056#2057#2058#2059#2060#2061#2062#2063#2064#2065#2066#2067#4991#12006#12004#12003#12001#12000#12005#39#38#172356.57364.65355.26354.41350.29349.97345.85344.22347.58337.05339.28334.96331.83341.54330.93338.37348.31337.55330.97326.69325.73326.00328.67328.61335.22327.89345.91344.28340.29326.74329.88327.78327.8645.00328.92329.73327.83330.30329.1645.00338.28334.13325.16325.27322.64327.53322.59323.98329.06329.66325.44324.59321.10320.82316.19313.85324.17320.41323.64325.22329.76325.29316.91315.62313.07269.65268.53269.44269.44270.08292.53291.11227.27271.57351.61349.34343.68344.40294.16294.85292.95293.52294.68297.12295.06292.11266.70266.38266.04265.65265.26264.69266.68266.51265.99265.82265.47264.91267.20266.72266.41266.17265.72265.13265.93265.72PT 261 8" TREE -NO TAG ???EXISTINGGARAGECONCFF 265.66GATEW/ BATH18" x 29" OVAL CMPFL= 258.0818" CMP FL=258.64TOP = 260.14TOP = 259.58wl markinggas line markREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MON108109103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113....................................................320310330340350TOPTOPTOETOPxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDYHxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHYDWVWVWVWVWVTOP OFTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCKSTO PSTOP$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCKHYDH YDWVWVWV WVWVWVHYDHY DWVWVWVL=85.51'%%128=22°47'17"R=215.00'PROPOSED HOUSETITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017SITE PLANA2.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"1SITE PLAN UPA+WWWWB.O.2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS#995511" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36720" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36623" COAST LIVE OAK/3#994919" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995620" VALLEY OAK/4#365/995018", 11"COAST LIVE OAK/3#995216", 11" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995113" COAST LIVE OAK/2EX. 2" DIA SSEX. 2" DIA SSINV=265.2'EX. SSLATERAL3673669949365/99509955995199529956270268266262264268258256270270270260300290280270260250290310300290280270320330340330320340350330340350320310300271.93272.52GS271.42EP270.81EP271.10EP271.10EP270.60EP269.8134035635040092272.516Bs/chk3000040145286.972EP40146285.622EP40147282.827EP40148280.319EP40149273.748EP40150271.936EP40151271.138EP40152272.422EP40153280.257EP40154282.581EP40155285.850EP40156288.248EP40170272.438Bs/chk3000040183270.926GB40184271.188GB40187272.164GB40188271.607GS40190271.794GS40191271.472GS40192271.221GS40193270.38340202271.207GS40203271.059EP40207271.350EP40208271.394EP40209271.602EP40210271.530EP40211271.244EP40212271.183EP40213271.032EP40214270.429EP40217269.181EP40218269.098EP40219269.112EP40220269.546EP40225273.195EP40226270.221EP40227268.407EP40228268.237EP40229269.178EP40230269.530EP40231270.130EP40232270.450EP40233270.732EP40234271.061EP40235271.222EP40236271.512EP40237271.055EP40238270.809EP40239270.722EP40242269.658EP40243270.303EP40246272.327EP40247271.860BS/CHK 300135.5' WOOD 3-RAIL FENCE#490#489#491#497#9911#9912#30#9926#29#9924#9925#31#9929#9930#9931#9932#9933#9934#9935#9936#9944#9945#9946#9947#9948#9949#9950#9951#9952#9955#9956#9959#9960#9961#9962#9963#9965#9966#9975#9976#9977#9978#9979#9980#9981#232#236#246#259#247#280#256#234#270#293#292#4143#4147#4149#4158#4162#4163#4164#4165#4176#4177#4178#4179#4180#4181#4182#4183#4184#4185#4157#4186#4156#4150#4154#4155#4187#4188#4189#4190#4191#4192#4193#4194#4195#4196#4197#4198#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#742#743#744#745#746#747#748#749#750#751#752#753#754#755#756#757#758#759#760#761#717#718#719#32#720#721#723#724#725#726#733#734#735#736#737#738#739#740#741#513#514#515#516#517#518#519#509#530#531#532#533#534#535#37#536#537#538#539#540#541#542#543#544#546#547#567#568#569#570#36#571#35#572#573#574#575#576#577#578#579#580#586#587#588#589#590#841#842#843#844#845#846#847#848#849#850#851#852#854#855#856#857#858#859#860#861#862#863#864#865#866#867#868#869#870#871#872#873#874#875#876#877#878#931#932#933#934#935#936#937#938#939#940#941#942#946#947#948#949#950#951#952#953#954#955#956#957#958#959#960#961#962#963#964#965#966#967#968#4922#4923#4924#4925#4926#4927#4928#4929#4920#4921#12006#12004#12003#12001#12000#39#38351.11356.57364.65355.26354.41350.29349.97345.85344.22347.58337.05339.28334.96331.83341.54330.93338.37348.31349.97337.55330.97326.69325.73326.00328.67328.61335.22327.89345.91344.28340.29326.74329.88327.78327.8645.00328.92329.73327.83330.30329.1645.00338.28334.13325.16325.27322.64327.53322.59323.98329.06329.66325.44324.59321.10320.82316.19313.85324.17320.41323.64325.22329.76325.29316.91315.62313.07xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxH YDWVWVHY DWV4' - 0"PROPOSED HOUSETITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ENLARGED SITEPLANA2.121200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1ENLARGED SITE PLANREFERENCE NORTH UPREF.REF.A7.211A7.11A7.2122A7.1111A8.112A8.1111335599101013131515AAGGHHJJLLMMNNPPQQRRKK881414OO66774422BBEEFFCCDD12121111II3 1/2" / 1'-0"2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017PROPOSED ROOFPLANA6.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED ROOF PLANREFERENCE NORTH TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017PERSPECTIVE VIEWSA7.001200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.PERSPECTIVE VIEWS LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"08500.ED01ENTRY DOOR1211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"RIDGE @ 18'-2"360354348342337332NATURAL GRADE -REFER TO ENGINEERS SITE PLAN -SHEET (X)35' MAX.35' MAX.GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILING35' MAX.12"REFER TO SHT. (X)48" CLEAR10' - 0"1' - 0"10' - 0"35' MAX.SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTERSEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.ED01ENTRY DOOR08500.DR01DOORS-108500.DR01DOORS-1LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"AGHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"BEFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-108500.RU01ROLL-UP DOOR09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER08500.DR01DOORS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTERCDIDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"35' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT AT GARAGE / A.D.U. -SEE SHT. (X)35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.ENTRY FOYER ROOF340339332336332330330GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGVOID UNDER MBR.08500.DR01DOORS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-1GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGTITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ELEVATIONSEXTERIORA7.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - FRONTSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - RIGHT LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"AGHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"BEFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTER09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-108500.DR01DOORS-1CDIDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"08500.DR01DOORS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-135' MAX.35435635435234934434033835' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX. ALLOWABLENATURAL GRADEVOIDMASTER ABOVELOWER LEVEL BEDROOMOUTDOOR COURTYARD 16' WIDESTAIRWELLGLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGGLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGLEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTER09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-1STAIR LANDING BELOW GRADE1211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"12"CLEAR48"33233033233434035035' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.TOP OF ROOF OF KIT -DININGSKYLT. OVER STAIRSA.D.U. OVER GARAGESTAIRWELLMASTER BATHMASTER BEDROOMDEN BEYOND + ENTRY FOYERLOWER FLOOR ALIGNS W/ MBR ABOVE22' - 6"PARAPET12' - 0"1' - 0"10' - 0"GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILING+36"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ELEVATIONSEXTERIORA7.211200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - LEFTSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - REAR LEGEND: SECTIONS BUILDINGEXTERIOR WALL INSULATION: ALL 2X4 EXTERIOR WALL CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION: ALL 2X6 EXTERIOR WALL CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)EXTERIOR ROOF/CEILING INSULATION: INSULATION IN CEILINGS, FLOORS AND ROOF FRAME CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)07210.2X607210.CEIL07210.2X4LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"ROOF FRAMING: SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFLOOR FINISH PER SCHEDULE, TYP.UNDER FLOOR INSULATIONEXTERIOR FINISH: SEE ELEVATIONS07210.CEILCEIL. INSULATION07210.2X6EXT. WALL INSULATIONLEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"GHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"EFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"379 SFMBED1RM252167 SFMCLOS1RM257203 SFBED4RM29445 SFVAN3RM295128 SFBED3RM296282 SFMEDIARM300323 SFBED2RM305418 SFDINING1RM319457 SFGREAT1RM320IDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"ROOF FRAMING: SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFLOOR FINISH PER SCHEDULE, TYP.07210.2X6EXT. WALL INSULATIONEXTERIOR FINISH: SEE ELEVATIONS07210.CEILCEIL. INSULATIONLEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"503 SFGARAGE2RM312198 SFADU-FAMILY1RM337130 SFADU-HALL1RM338132 SFADU-KITCH1RM3391211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017SECTIONSA8.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1SECTION 1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2SECTION 2 CASA DE CAMPOCR E E K S I D E O A K S Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1ALHAMBRA44680PKWY.JOHNHWY.HWY.ALHAMBRA AVE.ALHAM B R A AVE.RELIEZTAYLOR GRAYSONTO SAN JOSE TO SACRAMENTOTO ANTIOCHTO RICHMONDCASTLE CREEK CT.MUIRVALLEY RD.VALLEYBLVD .RVALLEY ALHAMBRAOAKBRIDGE LN.RD.CREEKSIDE OAKSLEGENDPROPOSEDEXISTINGABBREVIATIONSINDEX: Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 DETAILS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4DETAIL B - DISSIPATER DETAIL A - PERIMETER DRAINS 350360348346344 340330320322324326328330332334336338340342344346348352354356358362364366368CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5STRAW WATTLE FENCE DETAILCSILT TRAP DETAILBINLET PROTECTION DETAILA--- 350360 348346344340330320322324326328330332334336338340342344346348352354356358362364366368CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 3Removal due to construction Removal becuase it is deadTo remain, but work within the dripline CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6 Tree Evaluation Prepared For: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC 1200 Business Center Drive San Leandro, CA 94577 Prepared By: Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Arbor Consulting American Society of Consulting Arborists 237 Berna Avenue Napa, California 94559 (925) 525- 3795 November 3, 2021 Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 2 D ear David, Thank you for asking me to provide a Consulting Arborist Report for your Proposed new Home P roject located at 5 Casa de Campo in Creekside Oaks - in Martinez , California. I visited the site on October 31, 2021, to review the House Layout Plan provided by Aliquot Civil Engineering dated 9-25-2021, using Sheet C. The purpose of my site visit is to evaluate any impact the proposed home may on any protected trees. I reviewed a total of 36 trees that surround the proposed home that include (29) Coast Live oaks (Qurcas agrifolia), (6) Valley oaks (Quercas lobata), and (1) Bay Laurel (Laurus noblis). A majority o f the trees I ev aluated are growing above the driveway and retaining wall leading into the lot. There are (3) species of trees common to Martinez and surrounding hillsides, these are the Liv e oaks, Valley o aks and o ne Bay Tree. These trees hav e been growing in a grove amongst eac h other f or many years. As trees continue to mature they started competing for sunlight resulting in the lower trees leaning away f rom the trees above them. This resulted in 75% of the trees leaning at a 45 degrees angle towards the driveway and retaining wall. Within this grove are (5) dead trees that need to be removed before they fail. There are (8) critical trees that are leaning so severely they c annot be safely pruned, these are also recommended f or removal. The trees that are in poor c ondition have poor canopy structure and m ost of the canopy is f ull of deadwood f rom the competing trees growing above t hem . These trees are also recommended f or removal before they fail or die off creating fire hazards. Above this grove are many other trees that are in good health and far enough away from the proposed home. With all the recent fires it is recommended to remove the dead trees and any tree that can create a fire ladder. The remaining trees can be safely pruned to keep them from failing and to remove any deadwood or low hanging branches. The remaining healthy trees near the proposed new home need to be protected following the Tree Protection Guidelines below. I have attached maps that show the general location of each tree and a picture of each tree with diameter (dbh) and tree tag #. P lease review the health rating below and tree protection measures. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 3 Listed below Is the Inventory and Health of each protected tree. Tree Inventory and Health Note: Trees are measured using the DBH method – circumference, measured at 4.3 above the ground. Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 1 4157 Coast Live Oak 30/28 Poor 2 4185 Coast Live Oak 21" Poor 3 4184 Coast Live Oak 23" Poor 4 4183 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 5 4181 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 6 4177 Coast Live Oak 9" Poor 7 4176 Valley Oak 14" Poor 8 4165 Coast Live Oak 28/22 Poor 9 2765 Valley Oak 14" Fair 10 2766 Valley Oak 10/8 Poor 11 2771 Coast Live Oak 25" Fair 12 2768 Coast Live Oak 30" Dead 13 2770 Coast Live Oak 30" Poor 14 4158 Coast Live Oak 20" Poor 15 4164 Valley Oak 8" Poor 16 4162 Valley Oak 14" Poor 17 4163 Coast Live Oak 6" Poor 18 4178 Coast Live Oak 10/8 Poor 19 4179 Valley Oak 16" Fair 20 4188 Coast Live Oak 13" Poor 21 4187 Coast Live Oak 16" Poor 22 4180 Coast Live Oak 24" Poor 23 4182 Bay Laurel 8/12 Poor 24 292 Coast Live Oak 22 Critical 25 4186 Coast Live Oak 22/24/18 Critical 26 293 Coast Live Oak 19" Critical 27 4147 Coast Live Oak 14" Critical 28 4156 Coast Live Oak 8" Fair 29 4149 Coast Live Oak 13" Dead 30 4150 Coast Live Oak 20" Dead Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 4 Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 31 4143 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 32 4154 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 33 4155 Coast Live Oak 24" Critical 34 4189 Coast Live Oak 12/22 Critical 35 4197 Coast Live Oak 14/12 Dead 36 4198 Coast Live Oak 14/12/17 Dead I have been contracted by you to monitor the health of all your trees on site and to install protective fencing around the protected trees. I will be on site during any grading activity or pruning needs throughout the duration of the project. Below are the Tree Protection recommendations. Recommended Tree Protection Guidelines: All contractors including demolition, grading, and underground contractors, sub-contractors, construction superintendent and other pertinent personnel should be required to review these guidelines with the Project Arborist (PA) prior to beginning work on site. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) identifies will be installed 2’ outside of the drip-line in a half circle on all sides of the proposed home - by installing 4’ high orange protective fencing around the entire drip-line of the tree and roots from disturbance. The installation will be installed by the Project Arborist (Bob Peralta) and any work within the erected TPZ will need permission from the PA before being moved. The following signs will be posted on 8.5x11 inches and installed on all the fenc es – the sign will read: This is a Tree Protection Zone Movement of this fence requires the prior authorization of the Project Arborist & Owner (List Contact Information) Activities prohibited within the TPZ include: •Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils, ordumping of paint or poisonous materials on or around trees and roots.Poisonous materials include, but are not limited to, paint, petroleumproducts, concrete or stucco mix dirty water or any other material whichmay be deleterious to tree health. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 5 • The use of tree trunks as winch support, anchorage, as a temporary power pole, sign-post or any other similar function. • Cutting of roots by utility trenching, foundation digging, placement of curbs, trenches and other miscellaneous excavation without prior approval of the PA. • Soil disturbance or grade/drainage changes. • Materials must not be stored, stockpiled, dumped, even temporarily, inside the TPZ of protected trees. Activities permitted within the TPZ include: As needed or recommended by the PA • Irrigation, aeration, or other beneficial practices that have been specifically approved for use within the TPZ. • Mulch if needed and or fertilization as recommended by monthly site visits by the PA. • Each site visit will require a report recommending tree healthcare supplements, recommended watering as needed during peak summer months and reduction into Fall and Winter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Certified Arborist WE -7150A ASCA Consulting Arborist #505 Page | 1 Vincent A. Moita ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attorney at Law PO Box 880 Seal Beach, CA 90740 SENT VIA EMAIL (925) 783-9688 Tel vm@moitalaw.com August 12, 2022 Attn: Board of Supervisors – Contra Costa County RE: Tree Removal Permit Appeal - County File #CDTP21-00076 Dear Board of Supervisors, The current supply and demand imbalance for housing requires a systemic change in approving more housing projects. Preferably an approach should be reached that allows land use decisions to remain in local municipalities control and not become mandated by the State. However, such zeal cannot be to the detriment of established planning policies that shape the built environment for a sustainable and enjoyable future. It has come to my attention that a certain Tree Removal Permit - County File #CDTP21-00076 has been issued either through error or negligence that rises to the level of an abuse of discretion. Years of planning history, recorded documentation, and alternative site plans were not properly considered or weighed in issuing the Tree Removal Permit. Of particular concern: 1.Five trees slated for removal are deed restricted and duly recorded Heritage Trees that were not properly analyzed under Contra Costa County Ordinance Title 8, Section 816- 4.1002 being Trees #293, #4143, #4157, #4197, and #4198. 2.The project as approved is not consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan’s express Goals and Policies, or Design Regulations and the findings of consistency were therefore improper: a.The Environment Goal #1: Preserve and enhance both the natural and man-made environment in Alhambra Valley. Policy 3: Hilltops, ridges, rock outcroppings, mature stands of trees and other natural features shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible in the design of new projects. (emphasis added) Page | 2 b.New Development Goal 1: Allow development in accord with the goals and policies of the Countywide General Plan as it pertains to Alhambra Valley. 1.Policy 2: Ensure that the applicable rules for environmental protection are applied to both major and minor subdivisions. 3.The project and Tree Removal Permit fail to uphold the Conditions of Approval required by the Vesting Tentative Map recorded November 14, 1994 as County File RZ912928 & FSD907609 for the initial Creekside Oaks Estates subdivision for which the subject project is a part of and legally bound by, and findings were therefore improper. General Condition #3: F. Tree Impact Analysis prepared by W.E.S. Technology Corporation dated received on July 15, 1993 by the Community Development Department. “It is recommended that a certified arborist be contacted during individual lot design to minimize the effects on these trees” at pg 12, W.E.S. Technology Corporation Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan and Tree Impact Analysis “Tree impacts can be largely reduced through redesign. . . [t]hese recommendations are shown on Figure 4.” at pg 14, W.E.S. Technology Corporation Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan and Tree Impact Analysis. General Condition #13: The applicant or owner shall submit grading plans for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a grading permit for the purpose of Tree Preservation. All the mitigations contained in the July 15, 1993 Tree Impact Analysis are mandated. Prior to the submission to the Zoning Administrator , a licensed arborist shall have an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan relative to compliance with required tree preservation measures. (emphasis added) General Condition #20: Tree Impact F. The driveway of Lot #3 should parallel the existing roadbed and the Lot #3 site should be moved downhill, out of the major tree mass to the extent feasible (Location #6). [referenced on Figure 4] H. For any locations where the road passes close to trees located uphill of the road, retaining structures should be used to minimize impacts of grading on root zone integrity. Page | 3 General Condition #21: Tree Preservation and Replacement Plan The applicant shall provide for the replacement of trees for every 20 inches of aggregate circumference of trees proposed for removal. 4.The project fails to follow the Grading Plan and Tree Schedule in the Amended Map Subdivision 7609 filed 1-29-2004 in County Planning File # Z108-12188. a.The provided project site plans fall outside the pre-planned grading plans. See Exhibit 2 - Grading Plan page G5 b.The provide project site plans ignores the Conditioned Tree Protection Plan. See Exhibit 2 - Tree Protection Plan page G9 c.The provided project site plans ignores the Tree Schedule. See Exhibit 2 - Tree Preservation Plan page G10 5.The Arborist Report prepared by Bob Peralta and submitted by David Viaggiano, of USGL Land, LLC as evidence for which findings were made in support of the Tree Removal Permit was materially incorrect creating insufficient basis to make substantive findings. Additionally, the findings made were improper based on the faulty evidence submitted. a.The Arborist Report submitted Nov. 3, 2021 failed to identify any trees as heritage trees. b.The Arborist Report failed to label some trees, improperly measured other trees, and inadequately analyzed tree grove health in totality as a grove and instead analyzed each tree as an individual. i.Deed Recorded Heritage Tree #293 was listed in the Arborist report as a 19” tree in critical health. This tree, in the 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey was denoted as multi-stemmed, in good condition with a 4 out of 5 health rating, and had primary trunk diameters of 28” and 27” inches. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey health status was affirmed August 18, 2010 under the compliance review for Tree Bond Release – Subject SD907609. ii.Deed Recorded Heritage Tree #4157 was listed in the Arborist report as poor health with diameters of 30” and 28”. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey was denoted as Good health, with a 4 out of 5 health rating and trunk diameters multi-stemmed trunk diameters of 21”, 20,”,18”, and 5”. The 2003 Hortscience Tree Survey health status was affirmed August 18, 2010 under the compliance review for Tree Bond Release – Subject SD907609. iii.Tree #4198 was listed as being dead, when it is in fact alive. iv.Tree #2770 was listed as a 30” oak, and is actually 11” in diameter and is right next to an unmarked 30” oak that has no tag. Page | 4 DISCUSSION The planning record for this subject site clearly establishes a goal of preserving trees, particularly heritage trees, when alternative designs are feasible. Here, the Tree Removal Permit was improperly granted without serious consideration of alternative site plans or designs. Further, the Conditions of Approval on the Vesting Tentative Map were ignored as to the original Tree Impact Analysis provided by W.E.S. Technology Corporation, and subsequent Grading Plan, Tree Protection Plan and Tree Schedule in the Amended Map Subdivision 7609. In reviewing the site plan as proposed compared to the planning record’s housing site, visible in Figure 4, they are completely incongruous. As proposed, the site plan works against the foliage and mature tree grove to the determine of neighborhood viewsheds, deed recorded heritage trees, and the mature stands of trees and is therefore inconsistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan’s Environmental Goal #1, Policy #3. An alternative site plan that matches Figure 4’s map reasonably allows development, and maintain consistency with years of planning intent and documentation. Additionally, the evidentiary basis of the Arborist Report filed by the Project Proponent was riddled with errors and failed to disclose the Heritage tree status of three impacted Heritage Trees. This created a poor foundation for factual findings to be made by the Zoning Administrator and for the Planning Commission to rely upon. For example, the fact remains that only a singular inference could be reached as to tree #293 – that the evidence submitted was wrong and does not support granting of a tree removal permit. It was factually incorrect and no reasonable alternative deduction could be made. If factually correct evidence were originally presented, the result likely would have been different at both initial Zoning Administrator and County Planning Commission level. The record shows that the findings in favor of granting the Tree Removal Permit did not “bridge the analytical gap between raw evidence and the ultimate decision”1. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Tree Removal Permit be DENIED pursuant to County Ordinance, Title 8, Section 816-6.8010 (3) (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f). My Clients welcome the opportunity for the developer to resubmit a site plan that is consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan, the Conditions of Approval for the Creekside Oaks Estates Vesting Tentative Map dated November 11, 1994 and subsequent amendments, and one that ultimately respects the local biodiversity, canopy, viewsheds and heritage trees. Should this body affirm the Tree Removal Permit, my Clients reserve all rights. 1 Topanga Association for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles, 11 Cal. 3d at 514-15. Page | 5 Respectfully submitted, Vincent A. Moita, JD,MBA Attorney at Law CC: Department of Conservation and Development – Director < john.kopchik@dcd.cccounty.us> Department of Conservation and Development – Planner <Dominique.Vogelpohl@dcd.cccounty.us> Clerk of the Board of Supervisors < clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us> Board of Supervisors District 1 – John Gioia <John_Gioia@bos.cccounty.us> Board of Supervisors District 2 – Candace Andersen < supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us> Board of Supervisors District 3 – Diane Burgis < supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us> Board of Supervisors District 4 – Karen Mitchoff < supervisormitchoff@bos.cccounty.us> Board of Supervisors District 5 – Federal D. Glover < district5@bos.cccounty.us> List of Exhibits EXHIBIT 1: Select pages of Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map Sub 7609 and 2928-RZ (Creekside Oaks Estates). Pages 1, 2, 6, 8 & 9 & Figure 4. EXHIBT 2: Amended Subdivision Map 7609 - Grading Plan, Tree Protection Plan, Tree Schedule EXHIBIT 3: Compliance Review for Tree Bond Release – Dated August 18, 2010. SD907609 EXHBIT 4: Heritage Tree Program Notification Subdivision 7609, September 30, 2003 Table of Authorities 1.) Alhambra Valley Specific Plan, Adopted October 6, 1992 2.) Vesting Tentative Map – Application No: RZ912928 FSD907609,Effective Date November 12, 1994 3.) Vesting Tentative Map – Amended Map subdivision 7609 Creekside Oak Estates – 461 M 11 Filed 1-29-04. 4.) HortScience Tree Preservation Report, Creekside Oaks Estates, Martinez, CA – August, 2003. 5.) W.E.S. Technology Corporation Tree Impact Analysis, July 15, 1993. 6.) Contra Costa County Ordinance, Title 8, Section 816 7.) Topanga Association for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles, 11 Cal. 3d at 514-15. EXHIBIT 1 Select pages of Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map Sub 7609 and 2928-RZ (Creekside Oaks Estates). Pages 1, 2, 6, 8 & 9 & Figure 4. EXHIBIT 2 Amended Subdivision Map 7609 - Grading Plan, Tree Protection Plan, Tree Schedule EXHIBIT 4 Heritage Tree Program Notification Subdivision 7609, September 30, 2003 June 6, 2022 Dan and Sibhan Stokes 130 Oak Bridge Lane Martinez, CA 94553 Re: Arborist Pier Review Assessment of Oaks Proposed for Removal on the 5 Casa De Campo Property Dear Mr. & Mrs. Stokes, Per your request, and approved by the county, the following arborist report is an assessment of the grove of oaks located on the undeveloped Casa De Campo property located downslope and to the east of your property. Assignment I was asked to look at a previously assessed grove of 35 native oaks and one bay that are part of an extensive oak woodland lining the west edge of the lower property to be developed. The Stokes have concerns regarding the plan to remove 26 protected oaks, and how that might affect screening between them and other homes. W hile the Stokes are not opposed to the development of the lot, they would like the design to consider saving some of the trees in an effort to retain more of the screening. Introduction / Observations The project arborist (PA) for the development had inventoried 35 native oaks and one bay laurel back in October of 2021. Only 4 trees were given a fair rating, and all the rest were rated as poor (19), critical (8), or dead (5). It was recommended to remove the 26 trees that are dead, or in critical to poor condition. The basis for the recommendations are to reduce fire fuel loads by removing the dead trees or trees in poor condition that will become a greater fire concern as they decline. Critical trees were described as those with heavy leans that could pose a risk to the property. It is my opinion that the arborist looked at each tree individually and not as being part of a grove. This would reduce both their health and structural ratings. Trees with phototropic leans due to the adjacent over-story canopies adapt over the years and are less likely to fail as would an isolated tree that leans. In addition leaning trees with no targets placed under them are not considered a risk. I also observed a few trees that appeared to be miss-rated or miss-identified in the report. Tree #293 listed as a 19" coast live oak in critical condition is actually a multi-stemmed tree measuring 19", 17", 15", & 12". The tree is actually one of the healthiest trees in the grove, and although it does have co-dominant leader attachments, that defect could easily be mitigated with some minor pruning and or cabling. Tree #4198 is listed as being dead and is actually in fairly good condition. Tree #2770 listed as a 30" oak is only 11" in diameter and is right next to a 30" oak that has no tag. There are at least 7 other trees that I would upgrade their conditions to fair from critical or poor. Traverso Tree Service Phone: 925-930-7901 • 4080 Cabrilho Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 • Fax: 925-9723-2442 Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Discussion Although none of these trees are uniquely special on their own accord, as a grove they work together as a nice woodland habitat that provides valuable screening from existing homes below as well as the proposed home location. As far as fire concerns, there are a few dead trees and some large lower dead branches and understory grasses that could be removed to reduce fuel load and help beautify the grove. I am not sure of the development constraints on this lot, however, it would seem that a combination of fewer removals and a slight adjustment of the home location might provide the opportunity to preserve enough of this grove to retain some valuable screening. Recommendation I recommend reducing the total number of trees removed down to 12, consisting of the dead trees #2768, 4149, 4150, 4197, two trees leaning heavily over road (#4143 & 4147), as well as live trees # 4157, 4181, 4182, 4183, 4184, & 4185 along the east edge of the grove. The last 6 removals are to accommodate an adjusted building footprint. Limits of grading would need to be reduced as well to respect the root zones of trees to remain. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this assessment, and please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Tree map and photos attached. Sincerely, John C Traverso ISA Board Certified Master Arborist #WE-0206-B ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified ISA Certified Climber Specialist #WE-0206T Traverso Tree Service Phone: 925-930-7901 • 4080 Cabrilho Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 • Fax: 925-9723-2442 -2- Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Tree #293 listed as being in critical condition and only 19" in diameter. -3-John C Traverso, BCMA Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Trees #497 & 498 both listed as dead. Tree #498 is healthy with a phototropic lean that could be pruned a bit to make more pleasing and lesson end weight. This tree would help with screening and erosion as well. -4-John C Traverso, BCMA Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Grove of trees approved for removal. Canopies provide screening of lower home to the left from the Stokes residence up slope to the right. -5-John C Traverso, BCMA Department of Conservation and Development County Planning Commission Wednesday, April 27, 2022 – 6:30 P.M. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item #_____ Project Title: Tree Permit for a New Single-Family Residence on a Vacant Lot County File(s): #CDTP21-00076 Applicant: Owner: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC Zoning/General Plan: General Agricultural (A-2) / Agricultural Lands (AL) Site Address/Location: 5 Casa de Campo, Martinez / APN: 367-140-013 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Status: Categorical Exemptions – Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) - new construction or conversion of small structures Project Planner: Dominique Vogelpohl, Project Planner (925) 655-2880 Staff Recommendation: Approve (See Section II for Full Recommendation) I. PROJECT SUMMARY This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve a Tree Permit to allow removal of 21 code-protected trees and work within the dripline of 5 code- protected trees to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot. The trees to be removed include 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (between 8-14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (between 8-26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter). There are also 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) that are requested to be removed because they are dead. II. RECOMMENDATION Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) staff recommends that the County Planning Commission: County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 2 of 8 (1) DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve Tree Permit (County File #CDTP21-00076), based on the attached Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and (2) DIRECT staff to file a Notice of Exemption. III.GENERAL INFORMATION A. General Plan – The subject property is located within an Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan land use designation. B. Zoning District – The subject property is located within a General Agricultural (A- 2)zoning district. C. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - The proposed project is categorically exempt under Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a), regarding “New Construction”, which exempts one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. The project is to construct one single-family dwelling unit on a vacant lot zoned for single-family residential development. The project is to construct a single-family residence on a legal lot in an agriculturally zoned area where a single-family residence is a permitted use. There is tree removal and work within the dripline in order to construct the building, but this Tree Permit mitigates this potential impact with Best Management Practices to be executed during construction and protective fencing to be up along the trees’ driplines throughout construction, as described in the approved arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150), and tree replanting during the landscaping phase of this project. D. Lot Creation: Lot 3 of Tract 7609 “Creekside Oak Estates” recorded on January 29, 2004. IV.SITE/ AREA DESCRIPTION The subject property is a 5.619-acre vacant lot that is part of the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision in an established single-family residential neighborhood within the unincorporated area of Martinez. The subject property is accessed from Alhambra Valley Road to Creekside Oaks, and then Casa de Campo. The property is considerably sloped with nearly the entire property at more than a 26% incline, sloping up from the street. The area and property itself are in a natural setting of a native oak trees. The County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 3 of 8 property also has a Restricted Development Area easement that encompasses nearly half of the lot area, and is located along the north, east, and south boundary lines. Lastly, the road and driveway were already constructed with the creation of the subdivision. V. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2022, the Notice of Tentative Approval was mailed to the property owners adjacent to the subject property, and the last day to appeal was Monday, February 28. On February 25, Ms. Sibhan Stokes inquired about the project and expressed concerns about the tree removal. On February 28, staff provided the Tree Plan and arborist report and responded to questions regarding the project. The Stokes still had concerns over the project and filed an appeal that day. The applicant reached out to the Stokes on March 9, “We would like to work with you to plant new trees along your property line that will sufficiently mitigate the view from your house to our property. Together we can decide the number of new trees and placement of the trees that will be a mutually beneficial.” The Stokes appreciated the efforts but did not find this to satisfy their concerns in responding, “Our main objective is being an advocate for the Oak trees that your arborist deemed in critical condition back in October before the 20 inches of rain we received. While there are some trees that are beyond saving, many are in very good condition. We have no interest in trading out 50-70 year old, existing protected Oaks for saplings on our property line.” In response to the Stokes’s concerns, and that the applicant is willing, staff increased the amount of required tree replanting from five to ten 15-gallon indigenous Oak trees, and also included planting locations not only assist in screening the building from Alhambra Valley Road, but also from 130 Oak Bridge Lane. VI.PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a Tree Permit to allow removal of 21 code-protected trees and work within the dripline of 5 code-protected trees to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot. The trees to be removed include 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (between 8-14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (between 8-26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 4 of 8 trunk diameter). There are also 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) that are requested to be removed because they are dead. The approved arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) and respective tree plan, both attached to this Staff Report, show a tree proposed to be removed due to construction with a “circle”, removed because it is dead with a “square”, and to remain but work within the dripline with a “triangle”. The proposed residence is comparable to the neighborhood and adjacent properties within the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision. It is two-story, 4,476 square-feet with a 1,199 square-foot attached Accessory Dwelling Unit, an 875 attached garage, and 700 square-feet of decking. The proposed development is also subject to the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan, which is expanded on in Section IX(C) below. There is a retaining wall for the driveway, and another that extends along the west side of the building to provide walking access around the perimeter. VII.APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S DECISION 130 Oak Bridge Lane, Martinez – Daniel and Sibhan Stokes (appeal letter attached to this Staff Report): 1.“Removal of these healthy trees would jeopardize the stability of the soils as we live on a hillside.” Staff Response: Structural review includes review and approval of a site specific geotechnical report, and onsite inspection during construction will ensure construction follows approved structural drawings and geotechnical engineer’s recommendations. Also, required tree replacement and landscaping will aid in building back any lost soil stability due to tree removal. 2.“We chose to live in Alhambra Valley before developers arrived changing the landscape and knocking the eco-system out of balance.” Staff Response: The processing of the subdivision application that created the subject lot, took retaining the natural landscape into consideration, and designed prospective building sites accordingly. The subdivision established the area where the house is proposed to be the least impactful with the recording of the Restricted Development Area and the road design. Also, the road and driveway were already County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 5 of 8 constructed with the creation of the subdivision, so the house site is already predetermined. This development is outside the Restricted Development Area and at the end of the already constructed road, resulting in the least amount of grading and tree removal. However, staff has included the following condition to address the Stokes’s concern about removing a natural ecosystem: If project site grading, construction, tree removal, or site clearance will take place during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a nesting survey shall be conducted on the project site and within a zone of influence around the project site within 5 days of the initiation of the activities listed above. The zone of influence includes those areas off the project site where birds could be disturbed by earth-moving vibrations or noise. If nesting birds are found, then no work shall be initiated until nest-specific buffers have been established by the qualified biologist. The buffer area(s) shall be fenced off from work activities and avoided until the young have fledged, as determined by the qualified biologist. Active nests within or adjacent to the project site shall be monitored by the qualified biologist daily throughout the duration of project activities for changes in bird behavior or signs of distress related to project activities. If nesting birds are showing signs of distress or disruptions to nesting, then that nest shall have the buffer immediately increased by the qualified biologist until no further interruptions to breeding behavior are detectable. 3.“The arborist looked at the 26 trees in question on November 3rd when everything looks dormant and dead, before the big rains.” Staff Response: The five trees that were determined dead would not be revived with the rain season. Also, the approved arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) specified that the dead trees are a fire hazard and should be removed as soon as possible. The other trees requested for removal are either directly in or too close to the house footprint, within the retaining wall path, or within the grading footprint, and as the arborist report stated they are in such critical condition they are not expected to survive post construction. County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 6 of 8 VIII.AGENCY COMMENTS A. Alhambra Valley Improvement Association (AVIA): No comments were received prior to the preparation of this Staff Report. A Notice of Public Hearing for this item was also mailed to the AVIA. IX.STAFF ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION A. General Plan: The subject property is located within an Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan Land Use designation. The purpose of the AL designation is to preserve and protect lands capable of and generally used to produce food, fiber, and plant materials. However, properties located in the Agricultural Lands designation are also permitted for residential use. The approval and recordation of the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision legally established the subject property to be used for residential development. The project is to construct a single-family residence. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the Agricultural Lands designation. The Land Use Element of the County General Plan provides policies for specific geographic areas of the unincorporated County. These specific area policies focus on providing additional policies that pertain to the unique characteristics and needs of each identified area. Pursuant to Figure 3-2 (unincorporated Communities with Adopted Area Policies) of the Land Use Element, the project site is not located within one of these identified communities. B. Zoning: The subject property is located within a General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district. A single-family residence (and the accessory structures and uses normally auxiliary to it) is a permitted use in A-2. The proposed project is to construct a single-family residence, which is a permitted use that is also consistent with the development standards of A-2. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the intent and purpose of the A-2 zoning district. C. Alhambra Valley Specific Plan (AVSP) Design Guidelines: Single-family residential design guidelines are Chapter 5 of the AVSP. The AVSP states, “These guidelines are also intended to provide a viable framework for clear direction which will achieve the Specific Plan’s goal of quality residential development without limiting the residential design creativity” (pg 34). Staff Response: The proposed development and residence design is of high quality design, and also a product of “creative” design choices. It is not rural in the County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 7 of 8 traditional sense, but the traditional elements and soften the overall contemporary design. The roof is both hip and gable pitches, and there will be architectural details such as cornices and pillars along the exterior. The house itself is standard design. Its lower level is cut into the hillside to minimize bulk, and it terraces with the uphill slope, per the AVSP guidelines. The house size and envelope are comparable to the neighboring homes. There is a second story, but it is setback to keep in scale with the neighboring residences. The exterior building materials and paint color choices adhere to the rural character of the AVSP as explained further below. Therefore, staff finds the entire proposal consistent with the AVSP guidelines. “Home Designs: New home designs shall blend in with the semi-rural character of the area. Buildings on hillsides should complement the topography of the site. Exterior building materials of wood, wood shingles and brick are preferred, and exterior colors should be earth tone colors. Bright colors should be avoided. Structures shall comply with the guidelines found in Chapter 5” (pg 31). Staff Response: The proposed residence design is of semi-rural character through the proposed exterior building materials and colors: •Stucco siding painted alabaster or Light Sand color (cream/off white) •Wood trim for windows and doors •Natural stone veneer for the chimney •Traditional architectural details •Concrete Tile or Standing Seam Metal roofing painted Tan color D. Creekside Oak Estates Subdivision: The subject property is lot 3 of Creekside Oak Estates Subdivision. The subdivision conditioned lot 3 with specific development standards, and are the following: 1.Submit a site plan with cross sections showing the location of the house site for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The home site may be lowered to avoid visibility. Staff Report: Cross Section drawings are attached to this Staff Report. 2.Minimize visibility onto a designated Scenic Gateway, the building shall be tucked into the hillside to reduce the bulk, by excavating underground or below grade. Staff Response: The grading plan shows cutting into the hillside for the entire house site. No fill is proposed other than for the driveway area. The bulk is reduced with the house being set into the hillside, which is present in the County Planning Commission – April 27, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 8 of 8 attached section drawings. 3.The building shall be terraced by using the slope. Use roofs of lower levels as the deck open spaces for the upper levels. Staff Response: The house does terrace using the slope as present in the cross sections. There are cantilevered decks, but on the east side the house, not readily visible from the street. 4.Use colors that will blend with the natural landscape and neighboring buildings. Staff Response: Proposed colors achieve this, and a color board in attached to this Staff Report. 5.Submit a landscaping plan to help camouflage the structure from Alhambra Valley and Reliez Valley Roads as natural contours and accent natural features. Staff Response: The project is conditioned to submit a landscaping plan that are compliant with this condition prior to issuance of a building permit. E. Appropriateness of the Use: The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the uses permitted within the General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district. The residence is a single-family dwelling unit that is comparable with the area and located outside the Restricted Development area. The proposed tree removal is only what is necessary to construct the residence and promote fire safety. Lastly, the design of the residence is consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan as described above. X. CONCLUSION Staff finds that the proposed development is consistent with the Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan land use designation, complies with the intent and purpose of the General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district, and also consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan residential design guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends the Zoning Administrator approve County File #CDTP21-00076, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. Attachments: •Findings and Conditions of Approval •Daniel and Sibhan Stokes Appeal Letter, Applicant Response Letter, Stokes Response Letter •Maps – Parcel Maps, General Plan Map, Zoning Map, and Aerial Photo, and Street View Photos •Project Plans •Color Board •Arborist Report •Staff’s Power Point Presentation Attachment 1 Findings and Conditions of Approval 1 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076; David Viggiano (Applicant) and USGL Land, LLC (Property Owner). I. FINDINGS A. Growth Management Performance Standards 1. Traffic: The project is to construct a new single-family residence on a vacant lot. Policy 4-c under the Growth Management Program (GMP) requires a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more AM or PM peak-hour trips. The addition of a new single-family residence on Casa de Campo will not generate more than 100 hour traffic trips to and from the project site. Therefore, a traffic impact analysis is not required. 2. Water: The GMP requires new development to demonstrate that adequate water quantity and quality can be provided. New water service is required to accommodate the project. The property is located within the City of Martinez water service area. The City of Martinez must file an “out of service” application with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the subject property to receive water service. 3. Sanitary Sewer: The GMP requires that new development demonstrate that adequate sanitary sewer quantity and quality can be provided. The subject property currently receives sanitary sewer service from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. The construction of one single-family residence in a legally recorded subdivision area is not anticipated to increase the demand for sanitary sewer service to an unmanageable level for the existing wastewater system. The project requires Central Sanitary review and approval to be able to connect to the public sewer system. 4. Fire Protection: The fire protection standards under the GMP require that a fire station be within one and one-half miles of development in urban, suburban and central business district areas, or requires that automatic fire sprinkler systems be installed to satisfy this standard. The project site is within the Contra Costa Fire Protection District jurisdiction. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Fire District to ensure proper emergency apparatus access roadways, adequate and reliable water supply, and that the new residence be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 5. Public Protection: Public protection standards under the GMP require that a Sheriff Facility standard of 155 square feet of station area and support facilities 2 per 1,000 in population shall be maintained within the unincorporated area of the County. The project is in fill development in an already established subdivision and populated area. The addition of one single-family residence to an already urbanized neighborhood will not increase the demand for police service facilities as the project will not significantly increase in population. 6. Parks & Recreation: Parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. The project will not significantly increase the demand for parks or recreation facilities, as the project will not significantly increase the housing stock in the County. To mitigate the minor increase in demand for parks created by the project, the applicant will be required to pay a park dedication fee at the time of building permit issuance for the new single-family residence, as is required by Section 920-6 (Standards for Area and Fees) of the County ordinance. 7. Flood Control & Drainage: No portion of the subject property is located within a 100-year flood area as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. In addition, the project does not involve the removal, construction, or alteration of any dams or levees within the County. Also, Grading Inspection will conduct drainage review to verify compliancy with Stormwater C.3 Standards. B. Tree Permit Findings Required Factors for Granting Permit. The Zoning Administrator is satisfied that the following factors as provided by County Code Section 816-6.8010 (A) and (G) for granting a Tree Permit have been satisfied as follows: 1. 816-6.8010(A): The arborist report indicates that the tree is in poor health and cannot be saved. Staff Response: The arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) of Bob Peralta’s Consulting Arborists dated November 3, 2021, indicates that 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) are dead and cannot be saved. 2. 816-6.8010(G): Reasonable development of the property would require the alteration or removal of the tree and this development could not be reasonably accommodated on another area of the lot. Staff Response: New single-family residential development of a vacant lot that requires removal of 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (8, 14, and 14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live 3 Oaks (8, 20, and 26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter), and could not be reasonably accommodated on another area of the lot. The subdivision established this area to be the least impactful when constructing a residence with the recording of the Restricted Development Area. Also, the road and driveway were already constructed with the creation of the subdivision, so the house site is already predetermined. This development is outside the Restricted Development Area and at the end of the already constructed driveway, resulting in the least amount of grading and tree removal. C. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings The project is categorically exempt under Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures: Construction of one single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. The project is to construct a single-family residence on a legal lot in an agriculturally zoned area where a single-family residence is a permitted use. There is tree removal and work within the dripline in order to construct the building, but this Tree Permit mitigates this potential impact with Best Management Practices to be executed during construction and protective fencing to be up along the trees’ driplines throughout construction, as described in the approved arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150), and tree replanting during the landscaping phase of this project. II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076: Project Approval 1. This application for a Tree Permit and Alhambra Valley Design Review to allow removal of 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (8, 14, and 14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (8, 20, and 26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter) to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot, and to remove 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) because they are dead, is APPROVED by the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD). 4 2. This application for a Tree Permit is approved based on the following documents: • Application materials and project plans submitted on November 30, 2021; • Additional materials submitted on January 25, 2022; and • Arborist report prepared by certified arborist Bob Peralta (#WE-7150) of Bob Peralta’s Consulting Arborists dated November 3, 2021. Payment of Fees 3. This Tree Permit application was subject to an initial deposit of $3,000.00. The application is subject to time and material costs if the application review expenses exceed the initial deposit. Any additional fee due must be paid prior to submittal of a building permit, or 60 days of the effective date of this permit, whichever occurs first. The fees include costs through permit issuance and final file preparation. Pursuant to Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Resolution Number 2019/553, where a fee payment is over 60 days past due, the Department of Conservation and Development may seek a court judgement against the applicant and will charge interest at a rate of ten percent (10%) from the date of judgement. The applicant may obtain current costs by contacting the project planner. Tree Protection 4. Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils, or dumping of paint or poisonous materials on or around trees and roots is prohibited. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the tree protective fencing as described in the approved arborist report shall be installed onsite. Color photographs of the installed fencing shall be submitted to CDD staff as evidence that this condition has been satisfied. 6. If the tree protective fencing needs to be temporarily moved for construction purposes, once the work is complete, the tree protective fencing shall be put back to its original state. 7. The applicant shall immediately notify CDD staff of any damage that occurs to any tree during construction. Any tree not approved for destruction or removal that dies or is significantly damaged as a result of this project shall be replaced with a tree or trees of equivalent size and of a species as approved by the CDD to be reasonably appropriate for the situation. 5 8. If project site grading, construction, tree removal, or site clearance will take place during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a nesting survey shall be conducted on the project site and within a zone of influence around the project site within 5 days of the initiation of the activities listed above. The zone of influence includes those areas off the project site where birds could be disturbed by earth-moving vibrations or noise. If nesting birds are found, then no work shall be initiated until nest-specific buffers have been established by the qualified biologist. The buffer area(s) shall be fenced off from work activities and avoided until the young have fledged, as determined by the qualified biologist. Active nests within or adjacent to the project site shall be monitored by the qualified biologist daily throughout the duration of project activities for changes in bird behavior or signs of distress related to project activities. If nesting birds are showing signs of distress or disruptions to nesting, then that nest shall have the buffer immediately increased by the qualified biologist until no further interruptions to breeding behavior are detectable. Related Tree Activities/Removal Best Management Practices (BMPs) 9. The following tree related BMPs shall be implemented during project construction and shall be present on the site plan for building permit(s) as construction notes: • If needed, pruning shall adhere to ISA and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standards and Best Management Practices. • Should tree dripline encroachment be necessary, the contractor shall contact the project arborist for consultation and recommendations. • Should any damage to the trees occur, the contractor shall promptly notify the project arborist to appropriately address the damage. • If roots > 2” in diameter are encountered during trenching, grading and/or excavation, consult the project arborist for recommendations. If appropriate, roots shall be cleanly pruned with a handsaw or sawzall, immediately covered, and kept moist till backfilled. Restitution for Tree Removal 10. The following measures are intended to provide restitution for the removal of 26 code-protected trees: 6 A. Tree Replacement Plan: Prior to submittal of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Tree Replacement Plan prepared by a licensed arborist or landscape architect for the review and approval of CDD. The Plan shall provide for the planting of at least 10 indigenous oak trees, minimum 15- gallons in size. The Plan shall assist in screening the new residence from Alhambra Valley Road and 130 Oak Bridge Lane. The Plan shall be implemented prior to requesting a final inspection. B. Required Security to Assure Completion of Plan Improvements: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit) that is acceptable to CDD to ensure that the Tree Replacement Plan is implemented. Determination of Security Amount: The security shall provide for a breakdown of all of the following costs: •A labor and materials estimate for planting the 10 indigenous oak trees, minimum 15-gallons in size, and related irrigation improvements that may be required, prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor. •An additional 20% of the total of the above amounts to address inflation costs. C. Initial Deposit for Processing of Security: The County ordinance requires that the applicant pay fees to cover all staff time and material costs of staff for processing the landscape improvement security. At the time of submittal of the security, the applicant shall pay an initial deposit of $200. D. Duration of Security: The security bond for each lot shall be retained by the County for a minimum of 12 months up to 24 months following final building inspection. A prerequisite of releasing the bond between 12 and 24 months shall be to have the applicant arrange for the consulting arborist to inspect the trees and to prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event that CDD determines that the tree(s) intended to be protected has been damaged, and CDD determines that the applicant has not been diligent in providing reasonable restitution, then CDD may require that all part of the security be used depending on the extent of the damage to the tree(s). 7 11. Tree removal associated with development shall occur only with an approved grading or building permit. Contingency Restitution for Work within the Dripline 12. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 816-6.1204 of the Tree Protection and Preservation Ordinance, to address the possibility that construction activity nevertheless damages the tree(s) where work is within their dripline, the applicant shall provide the County with a security (e.g., bond, cash deposit) to be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, to allow for replacement of the tree(s) intended to be preserved that are significantly damaged by construction activity. The security shall be based on: A. Extent of Possible Restitution Improvements: The planting of up to 5 indigenous oak trees, 15-gallons in size, in the vicinity of the affected tree(s), or equivalent planting contribution, subject to prior review and approval of CDD. B. Determination of Security Amount: The security shall provide for a breakdown of all of the following costs: • Preparation of a landscape/irrigation plan by a licensed landscape architect or arborist. • A labor and materials estimate for planting 5 indigenous oak trees, 15- gallons in size, and related irrigation improvements that may be required, prepared by a licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor. • An additional 20% of the total of the above amounts to address inflation costs. C. Acceptance of Security: The security shall be subject to review and approval of CDD. The County ordinance requires that the applicant pay fees for all staff time and material costs associated with processing a tree protection security. The applicant shall pay an initial fee deposit of $200 at time of submittal of a security. D. Duration of Security: The security shall be retained by the County for a minimum of 12 months and up to 24 months following completion of work within the trees’ dripline. A prerequisite of releasing the bond prior to 24 months shall be to have the applicant arrange for a consulting arborist to inspect the tree(s) and prepare a report on the trees’ health. In the event that CDD determines that any of the trees intended to be preserved have been damaged by development activity, and CDD determines that the applicant has not been diligent in providing restitution of the 8 damaged tree(s), then CDD may require that all or part of the security be used depending on the extent of the damage to the tree(s). Alhambra Valley Specific Plan 13. The approved color and material board shall remain the same and be present on the elevation plans for building permit(s). If any color or material choices are changed after this approval, the applicant/property owner must first obtain approval from CDD staff. Prior to final building inspection, as-built color photographs of the residence shall be submitted to CDD staff as evidence that this condition has been satisfied. 14. Fences – Fences shall be designed and located so that they do not block vehicle and pedestrian sightlines and so that they are compatible with the design of the residential building and are aesthetically attractive. a. New fencing up to 4-feet in height is allowed at the front property boundary and within the front yard setback. Fencing shall be open-rail or wire. b. Solid board fencing along side and rear property boundaries are to be discouraged in cases where an agricultural use is adjacent to proposed development; fencing on slopes greater than 15% shall be open-rail or wire. Barbed wire may be used to keep grazing animals contained. 15. Exterior Lighting – Both construction and permanent exterior lighting should be designed to eliminate glare. Lighting shall be shielded and directed downward. Lamps shall be low wattage and have an incandescent light color. 16. Drought-Tolerant Landscaping – Landscaping shall comply with the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Turf areas shall be restricted to a maximum of 25% of the total planting area. 17. Public Utilities – all new utilities shall be placed underground. Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) 18. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a completed WELO Part I shall be submitted to CDD staff for review and approval. The approved Landscaping Plans under WELO Part I shall be present in the construction plan set for a building permit. 19. Prior to final building inspection, a completed WELO Part II – Certificate of Completion (attached) shall be submitted to CDD staff for review and approval. 9 20. The landscaping plan shall be compliant with the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or County Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever ordinance applies. Construction Period Restrictions and Requirements Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following construction related BMPs shall be implemented during the tree related activities and during project construction and shall be present on the site plan for building permit(s) as construction notes: 21. Unless specifically approved otherwise via prior authorization from the Zoning Administrator, all construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on state and federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the state or federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) President’s Day (State) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Juneteenth National Independence Holiday (Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For information on the actual days and dates that these holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal: http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/k8.htm State: http://www.sos.ca.gov/holidays.htm a. The site shall be maintained in an orderly fashion. Following the cessation of construction activity, all construction debris shall be removed from the site. b. The project sponsor shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and 10 shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors and concrete pumps as far away from sensitive receptors as possible. c. The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to avoid interference with existing neighborhood traffic flows. d. Transporting of heavy equipment and trucks shall be limited to the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and is prohibited on state and federal holidays. e. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is prohibited. ADVISORY NOTES ADVISORY NOTES ARE NOT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; THEY ARE PROVIDED TO ALERT THE APPLICANT TO ADDITIONAL ORDINANCES, STATUTES, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. A. NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, ASSESSMENTS, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the applicant has the opportunity to protest fees, dedications, reservations or exactions required as part of this project approval. To be valid, a protest must be in writing pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 and must be delivered to the Community Development Division within a 90-day period that begins on the date that this project is approved. If the 90th day falls on a day that the Community Development Division is closed, then the protest must be submitted by the end of the next business day. B. Additional requirements may be imposed by the following agencies: • Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division • Contra Costa County Public Works Department • Contra Costa Fire Protection District • Central Contra Costa Sanitary District • Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Prior to applying for a building permit, the applicant is strongly encouraged to contact these agencies. Attachment 2 Daniel and Sibhan Stokes Appeal Letter, Applicant Response Letter, and Stokes Response Letter US GL Land, LLC 1200 Business Center Drive San Leandro, CA March 4, 2022 Regarding: 5 Casa De Campo, Creekside Oaks, Martinez Tree Permit Approval Dear Mrs. Stokes, What we have in common is our love of the trees and rolling hillside vistas here in Alhambra Valley. On behalf of the property owner, I am reaching out in response to the Contra Costa County tree permit appeal you made February 25th. We ask that you please reconsider the appeal. We have a suggestion. We would like to work with you to plant new trees along your property line that will sufficiently mitigate the view from your house to our property. Together we can decide the number of new trees and placement of the trees that will be a mutually beneficial. Please feel free to contact me directly or if you are more comfortable contacting our assigned project planner Dominique Vogelpohl please do so. dominique.vogelpohl@dcd.cccounty.us Yours Truly, Dave Viggiano, Architect Sibhan Stokes Tree lover ㅡ Sibhan Stokes 130 oak bridge lane Martinez , ca , 94553 9 March 2022 Dave Viggiano, Architect US GL Land, LLC 1200 Business Center Drive San Leandro, CA Dear Mr. Viggiano , Thank you for reaching out , we are happy to hear that you are a tree lover and a fan of the Alhambra Valley. My husband and I feel blessed to have lived here for 22 years , in that time we have planted over 100 trees and mourned the loss of a few due to natural causes . Many of the trees we planted were in preparation for the eventuality of development to the property bordering ours . The trees we planted 20 years ago are large but not large enough to provide a privacy screen for your build site as you have it planned currently . Our main objective is being an advocate for the Oak trees that your arborist deemed in critical condition back in October before the 20 inches of rain we received . While there are some trees that are beyond saving , many are in very good condition . We have no interest in trading out 50-70 year old , existing protected Oaks for saplings on our property line . We are curious as to why it is so important for the property owners to plan the build within the existing tree line when there is a big portion of the lot completely devoid of trees? We plan to move forward with our appeal to the city to save as many Oaks as possible , as a fellow tree lover you can understand our passion . Best, Sibhan and Dan Stokes Attachment 3 Maps – Parcel Maps, General Plan Map, Zoning Map, Aerial Photo, and Street View Photos TP21-0076 CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:9,028 Notes0.30.14 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.3 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. General Plan: Agricultural Lands (AL) City Limits General Plan SV (Single Family Residential - Very Low) SL (Single Family Residential - Low) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) SH (Single Family Residential - High) ML (Multiple Family Residential - Low) MM (Multiple Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) MV (Multiple Family Residential - Very High) MS (Multiple Family Residential - Very High Special) CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) MO (Mobile Home) M-1 (Parker Avenue Mixed Use) M-2 (Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use) M-3 (Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use) M-4 (Willow Pass Road Mixed Use) M-5 (Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use) M-6 (Bay Point Residential Mixed Use) M-7 (Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Mixed Use) M-8 (Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed Use) M-9 (Montalvin Manor Mixed Use) M-10 (Willow Pass Business Park Mixed Use) M-11 (Appian Way Mixed Use) M-12 (Triangle Area Mixed Use) M-13 (San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use) M-14 (Heritage Mixed Use) CO (Commercial) OF (Office) BP (Business Park) LI (Light Industry) HI (Heavy Industry) AL, OIBA (Agricultural Lands & Off Island Bonus Area) CR (Commercial Recreation) ACO (Airport Commercial) LF (Landfill) PS (Public/Semi-Public) PR (Parks and Recreation) OS (Open Space) AL (Agricultural Lands) AC (Agricultural Core) DR (Delta Recreation) WA (Water) WS (Watershed) Assessment Parcels CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:9,028 Notes0.30.14 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.3 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Zoning: General Agricultural (A-2) City Limits Zoning R-6 (Single Family Residential) R-6, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-6 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) R-6 -TOV -K (Tree Obstruction and Kensington) R-6, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-6 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-7 (Single Family Residential) R-7 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-10 (Single Family Residential) R-10, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) R-20 (Single Family Residential) R-20, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-40 (Single Family Residential) R-40, -FH -UE (Flood Hazard and Animal Exclusion) R-40, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) R-65 (Single Family Residential) R-100 (Single Family Residential) D-1 (Two Family Residential) D-1 -T (Transitional Combining District) D-1, -UE (Urban Farm Animal Exclusion) M-12 (Multiple Family Residential) M-12 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) M-17 (Multiple Family Residential) M-29 (Multiple Family Residential) F-R (Forestry Recreational) F-R -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) F-1 (Water Recreational) F-1 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2 (General Agriculture) A-2, -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-2, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-2, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) A-2 -SD-1 (Slope Density Hillside Development) A-2, -SG (Solar Energy Generation Combining District) A-2 -X (Railroad Corridor Combining District) A-3 (Heavy Agriculture) A-3 -BS (Boat Storage Combining District) A-3, -BS -SG (Boat Storage and Solar Energy Generation) A-3 -FH (Flood Hazard Combining District) A-3, -FH -SG (Flood Hazard and Solar Energy Generation) CDTP21-00076 Legend 1:2,257 Notes0.10.04 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION 0.1 0 Miles WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Aerial Photo City Limits Streets Building Outlines Assessment Parcels World Imagery Low Resolution 15m Imagery High Resolution 60cm Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Citations Front of lot from Alhambra Valley Road Rear of lot Attachment 4 Project Plans TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017COVER SHEETA1.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.NEW HOMEGARAGERESIDENCE LEVEL-1TYPE V-B - THREE STORYFIRE-SPRINKLEREDR-3 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE)U (GARAGE)(LOT SIZE: 67,736 S.F.)----1620 S.F.6.7%875 S.F.1530 S.F.5675 S.F.4566 S.F.------RESIDENCE LEVEL-22946 S.F.GENERAL BUILDING NOTESDRAWING DATA CONTAINED HEREIN IS AS EXACT AS COULD BE DETERMINEDWITHIN THE PROJECT DESIGNER'S DESIGN SCOPE OF SERVICES RENDERED.AS SUCH THE ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF THE DESIGN DATA IS NOTGUARANTEED. THE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR, GENERALCONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL ENDEAVOR TO OBTAIN,VERIFY AND CONFIRM EXACT DESIGN DATA ON SITE AND SUITABLY ADAPTTHE WORK TO CONFORM TO EXACT CONDITIONS ON SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DESIGN DATA AMBIGUITIES ORDISCREPANCIES CONTAINED IN THE CONTRACT TO THE OWNER IN WRITING.ALL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO ADAPT THE WORK SHALL BE MADE BYTHE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND ACTUALBUILDING MEASUREMENTS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRAWING INFORMATION.SPECIFIC TRADE NAMES MENTIONED IN THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR THEPURPOSES OF ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS OF QUALITY, STYLE ORTYPE, AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT SUBSTITUTIONS. ALLSUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER INWRITING WITHIN A SUFFICIENT TIME FRAME AS NOT TO DELAY PROJECTCOMPLETION.SUBSTITUTIONS FOR SPECIFIED MATERIALS:4.013.02THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PLANREVIEW, PERMIT, LICENSE, AND INSPECTION APPROVALS. ALL FEESREQUIRED FOR APPROVAL SHALL BE PAID BY THE OWNER.PERMITS, LICENSES, INSPECTIONS AND FEES:DATA AND MEASUREMENTS:3.012.01PRIOR TO CONTRACT APPROVAL, THE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR,GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE PROJECTSITE, AND BY THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION, DETERMINE EXISTING SITECONDITIONS AS TO THE QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS, LABOR HOURS, AND ANYOTHER COST ASSOCIATED WITH WORK THAT IS TO BE DONE UNDER THEIRCONTRACT AND AS REQUIRED TO PASS ALL BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTIONS.ALL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE INSPECTION AUTHORITY SHALL BEMADE BY EACH SUBCONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:1.013.03DIMENSIONS TO DOORS, WINDOWS, AND OPENINGS ARE NOMINAL WIDTHS.REFER TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR ACTUAL ROUGH OPENINGS, FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD. ALL DOORS NOT LOCATED BY DIMENSION ON PLAN OR DETAIL SHALL BE 3 INCHES FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF NEAREST DOOR BUCK OR CENTERED ON ROOM.3.04ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE ACTUALWALL FINISH DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AND ARE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS TODETERMINE PROPER CLEARANCES.LOT COVERAGE:TOTAL UNCONDITIONED AREA:TOTAL CONDITIONED AREA:% LOT COVERAGE:BUILDING SHEET ABBREVIATIONSPROJECT VICINITY MAPBUILDING AREASTRUCTURALSHELF & POLEBMBEAMCLEAREQUALELEVATIONDISH WASHERDOUGLAS FIRDOORDIAMETERCONTINUOUSCONCRETEDOUBLECLOSETCENTERLINECERAMICCEILINGCEMENTBLOCKINGBOARDCONTROL JOINTDRAIN INLETCLEANOUTEQELCLOEDWDRDIADIEASTCONCCONTINDBLDFCOCLGCLRCERCJBLKGBRDCEMSTRUCTS&PMEDICINE CABINETMINIMUMMANUFACTURERMAXIMUMHOSE BIBBLAVATORYHIGH OR HEIGHTGALVANIZEDLAVMTLMCMINMETALLTMAXMANFLINLBLIGHTLINENPOUNDHBJTSGYPHJOISTGYPSUMGALVGL GLASSSLDSIMPSIMSHTHGSHWR'SIMPSON'SLIDINGSIMILARSHEATHINGSHOWERALUMINUMANCHOR BOLTADJACENTALUMABADJBOWBOTTOM OF WALLCLCENTER TO CENTERCCPROPOSEDSPACEREFERENCE NORTHPROJECT DATAAPPLICABLE BUILDING CODE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:CONSTRUCTION TYPE:2019 CBC, CRC, CEC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CEC (ENERGY CODE), CFC, & CGBCFPFFFLUORFIXFIRE PLACEFLUORESCENTFINISH FLOORFIXTUREGFCIGAGROUND FAULT INTERRUPTERGAUGEOFCINOCO/ON CENTEROWNER FURNISHEDCONTRACTOR INSTALLEDNORTHOVERPBPLPHPUSH BUTTONPHONEPLATERREFPTPOCREFRIGERATORPRESSURE TREATEDPOINT OF CONNECTIONRISERSRWDRMREINF REINFORCEDSOUTHREDWOODROOMSFSBSQUARE FOOTSET BACKTOGTVUCRTYPTOSTTOCTEMPTOFTOPTOWWCWDW/WWHWWMWPTOP OF GRADETOP OF SLABTYPICALTELEVISIONTOP OF CONCRETETEMPEREDTREADTOP OF FLOORTOP OF PAVEMENTTOP OF WALLUNDER COUNTER REFRIG.WATER CLOSETWOODWESTWITHWELDED WIRE MESHWATER PROOFWATER HEATERPROJECT TEAMPROJECT SCOPEDESIGNER:USGL LAND,LLC1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER:TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSULTANT:TRUSS DESIGN:CIVIL ENGINEER:FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN:PROJECT LOCATION:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553APN:367-140-017NEW HOME:RESIDENCE5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553APN:367-140-0173.05INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.A1.11 COVER SHEETA2.11 SITE PLANA2.12 ENLARGED SITE PLANA3.00 LEGENDS AND KEYNOTESA3.11 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -LOWER LEVEL 1A3.21 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -MAIN LEVEL 2A3.31 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -ADU LEVEL 3A4.11 SCHEDULESA6.11 PROPOSED ROOF PLANA7.00 PERSPECTIVE VIEWSA7.11 ELEVATIONS EXTERIORA7.21 ELEVATIONS EXTERIORA8.11 SECTIONSA9.11 DETAILSAE0 UTILITY KEYNOTES ANDLEGENDAE1 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 1AE2 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 2AE3 UTILITY PLAN-LEVEL 3AG1 CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTSAG2 CAL GREEN REQUIREMENTSSHEET INDEXRESIDENCE LEVEL-31199 S.F.DECKS AND PATIO AT LEVEL-2745 S.F. UPA270+268266REMOVEREMOVEREMOVEPRUNE/POTENTIAL REMOVALREMOVEPRUNE/POTENTIAL REMOVALREMOVE286292288288286284282290WM WM WM WWWWWWB.O.B.O.A8"∅ SS8"∅ SS2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS8"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS50100267.845DI50101267.870DI50102267.880DI#31211" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3158" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#70827", 16" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#76619" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#70613" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#70711" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=1#7098", 5" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=0 #31311" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3149" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#31617" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3 #50125", 22" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#317/50211" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=3#318/50317" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#50415", 15" COASTLIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#50520", 19"COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#31921" DIACOAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=0#32019" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#32213" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#32318" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=4#32414" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3257" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#32622" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32717" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32819" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#32911" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33015" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33116" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33213" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#33340" MONTEREY PINESUITABILITY=3#33411", 9", & 9" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#3359" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#59329", 19" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=4#50610" VALLEY OAKSUITABILITY=3#50825" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=4#336/50710" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=2#337/71113", 6" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=2#338/71022" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#3398" CALIFORNIA BAYSUITABILITY=3#71318" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=3#71222" COAST LIVE OAKSUITABILITY=0#76423" COAST LIVE OAK/0#341/120059",6",4" CALIFORNIA BAY/0#34016" COAST LIVE OAK/3#34221" COAST LIVE OAK/1#34311", 8" COAST LIVE OAK/2#34421" COAST LIVE OAK/4#34518" COAST LIVE OAK/4#34611" CALIFORNIA BAY/3#34722" CALIFORNIA BAY/3#34813" COAST LIVE OAK/2#996811" COAST LIVE OAK/0#99699",6",5",4" CALIFORNIA BAY/2#34912" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35019" COAST LIVE OAK/3#3518" COAST LIVE OAK/3#997019" COAST LIVE OAK/3#35212" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35424" COAST LIVE OAK/4#3538" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35515" COAST LIVE OAK/2#35615" COAST LIVE OAK/3#3579" COAST LIVE OAK/2#99587", 4" BAY/0#995316", 13"COAST LIVE OAK/3#35819",13" COASTLIVE OAK/3#364/995417" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36016" COAST LIVE OAK/0#36117" COAST LIVE OAK/2#36317" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36210" COAST LIVE OAK/2# 995716" COASTLIVE OAK/3# 3599" COASTLIVE OAK/2#995511" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36720" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36623" COAST LIVE OAK/3#994919" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995620" VALLEY OAK/4#365/995018", 11"COAST LIVE OAK/3#995216", 11" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995113" COAST LIVE OAK/2SDMIGR=267.85'8' INV NE 257.85 APPROXEX. 2" DIA SSEX. 2" DIA SSINV=265.2'EX. SSLATERAL342341/12005343344345346347349348350351352353354356355357358360359361362363367366369370371372373/20132011374/435375/434376/433378335333334332331330329328327326339325324322323320319313314315316312337/7113409949365/9950318/503317/5029968379/2009766706707708709501336/507508506593504505713338/71071299699970995899539957364/99549955995199529956994099399938993799419922368/172994399422003200420022001200720082006200520142012377/43024499543643720154274284297644324312702702802 7 0 2702902802902703402603302802902703103303203403302902802903103 2 0 330 2702802903202803103002602 7 0 270270280280290270270290290286282292260280270260250270280270292288286284282278276284286288292294338272274292288286284282278276328338266332328326324322318316314312310308306304302300298334336338342344346336326328296296294294340342344348292288286284282278276284286288292294332334 334346 284286288326324322318316314312282276272274278308306304302298296294292294292290288286270268268264266262266262258256254252248264268258256262264266268260270270260250270260260340330320310300290280270260250300290280270260250240290300310290280270260250310300290280270320330340330320340350330350320310300271.93272.52GS271.42EP270.81EP271.10EP271.10EP270.60EP269.8135034035635035640092272.516Bs/chk3000040093295.132FS/CHK4008440094291.969GB40095292.207GB40096292.038GB40097285.436GB40098283.618GB40099281.195GB40100277.750GB40101273.149GB40102277.747GB40103280.473GB40104286.714GB40105295.828GB40106296.338GB40107295.286GB40108293.782GB40109292.194GB40110285.584GB40111288.620GB40112289.648GB40113289.437GB40114286.572GB40115286.882GB40116286.633GB40117280.437GB40118281.366GB40119279.761GB40120277.020GB40121275.088GB40122279.313GB40123284.961GB40124286.897GB40125287.640GS40126287.500GS40127289.029GS40128290.864GS40129292.202GS40130292.850GS40131291.719GS40132273.989EP40133277.569EP40134282.234EP40135286.296EP40136291.207EP40137293.626EP40138294.804EP40139296.192EP40140296.771EP40141296.996EP40142296.950EP40143294.715EP40144292.217EP40145286.972EP40146285.622EP40147282.827EP40148280.319EP40149273.748EP40150271.936EP40151271.138EP40152272.422EP40153280.257EP40154282.581EP40155285.850EP40156288.248EP40157289.882EP40158292.898EP40159294.377EP40160294.945EP40161296.991EP40162297.168EP40163294.448EP40164290.367EP40165285.502EP40166282.072EP40167278.994EP40168276.531EP40169274.169EP40170272.438Bs/chk3000040171278.396FS/CHK4000140172268.911GB40173269.024GB40174269.922GB40175269.852GB40176269.061GB40177268.016GB40178268.518GB40179268.928GB40180268.767GB40181268.793GB40182268.717GB40183270.926GB40184271.188GB40187272.164GB40188271.607GS40190271.794GS40191271.472GS40192271.221GS40193270.383GS40194269.956GS40195268.661GS40196269.058GS40197269.106GS40198269.151GS40199269.103GS40200268.760GS40201269.985GS40202271.207GS40203271.059EP40207271.350EP40208271.394EP40209271.602EP40210271.530EP40211271.244EP40212271.183EP40213271.032EP40214270.429EP40215269.806EP40216269.296EP40217269.181EP40218269.098EP40219269.112EP40220269.546EP40221271.188EP40222274.585EP40223276.776EP40224276.326EP40225273.195EP40226270.221EP40227268.407EP40228268.237EP40229269.178EP40230269.530EP40231270.130EP40232270.450EP40233270.732EP40234271.061EP40235271.222EP40236271.512EP40237271.055EP40238270.809EP40239270.722EP40242269.658EP40243270.303EP40246272.327EP40247271.860BS/CHK 3001340248264.342GS40249269.708GS40250276.869CONCL40251278.848CONCL40252280.098CONCL40253281.258CONCL40254282.693CONCL40255284.385CONCL40256287.845CONCL40257290.773CONCL40258293.766CONCL40259298.699CONCL40260298.370TC40261294.402TC40262288.643TC40263282.532TC40264280.476TC40265277.901TC40266279.271TC40267276.782TC40268280.542GB40269286.853GB40270290.770GB40271295.524GB40272300.149GB40273295.097GS40274293.994GS40275291.173GS40276286.874GS40277278.193GB40278276.907GB#9909JOINT TRENCHJOINT TRENCHUNIDENTIFIED UTEND OFSIGNALJOINT TRENCH24i n CMPSDCB12in.SDUP+RISERSUP+RISERSGPUP+RISERSGAS-3.0dGAS-2.1dGAS 2.1 DEEPGAS-2.2dOBW ZONE III 12in PVC WATER (N/L)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)ZONE II 6in AC WATER (T/W)CLOSED VALVESBLOWOFF6in AC WATER (T/W)WSWSWSWSDWDWDWDWEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP#2710#2711#2712#2713#2714#2715#2716#2717#2718#2719#2720#2721#2722#2723#2725#2724#2726#2727#2728#2729#2730#2731#2732#2733#2734#2735#2736#2737#2738#2739#2740#2741#2742#2743#2745#2746#2744#2747#2748#2749#2750#2751#2752#2754#2753#2755#2756#2757#2758#2759#2760#2761#2762#2763#2764#2765#2766#2767#2768#2769#2770#2771#2772#2773#2774#2775#2776#2777#2778#2779#2780#2781#2782#2783#2784#2785#2786#2787#2788#2789#2790#2791#2792#2793BLDG A AREA=2228.57 SFBLDG b AREA=322.30 SF5.5' WOOD 3-RAIL FENCE5.5' WOOD 3-RAI L FENCEBARB WIRE FENCEBARB WIRE FENCEBARB WIRE FENCE#16#17#19#20#_____#4989#4997#4999#4996#4995#4985#427#428#429#430#431#432#24#433#434#435#436#437#25#438#490#489#491#4385#4386#4387#4388#4389#483#484#485#486#487#488#492#493#494#495#496#497#9910#9911#9912#9913#9914#9915#9916#9917#9918#9919#9920#9921#9922#30#9926#9927#9928#29#9924#9925#319923#9929#9930#9931#9932#9933#9934#9935#9936#9937#9938#9939#9940#9941#9942#9943#9944#9945#9946#9947#9948#9949#9950#9951#9952#9953#9954#9955#9956#9957#9958#9959#9960#9961#9962#9963#9965#9966#763#9968#9969#9970#9971#4986#4993#4492#22#5000#9972#9973#9974#9975#9976#9977#9978#9979#9980#9981#232#236#246#259#247#280#256#234#270#293#292#4143#4147#4149#4158#4162#4163#4164#4165#4176#4177#4178#4179#4180#4181#4182#4186#4156#4150#4154#4155#4187#4188#4189#4190#4191#4192#4193#4194#4195#4196#4197#4198#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#506#507#508#501#502#503#504#505#764#765#766#742#743#744#745#746#747#748#749#750#751#752#753#754#755#756#757#758#759#760#761#762#40#41#701#702#703#704#705#706#707#708#709#710#711#712#713#714#715#716#717#718#719#32#720#721#722#723#724#725#726#727#728#729#730#731#732#733#734#735#736#737#738#739#740#741#510#511#512#513#514#515#516#517#518#519#520#509#521#522#523#524#525#526#527#528#529#530#531#532#533#534#535#37#536#537#538#539#540#541#542#543#544#545#546#547#548#549#550#551#552#553#554#555#556#557#558#559#560#561#562#563#564#565#566#567#568#569#570#36#571#35#572#573#574#575#576#577#578#579#580#581#582#583#584#34#585#586#587#588#589#590#591#592#593#4992#841#842#843#844#845#846#847#848#849#850#851#852#854#855#856#857#858#859#860#861#862#863#864#865#866#867#868#869#870#871#872#873#874#875#876#877#878#973#974#931#932#933#934#935#936#937#938#939#940#941#942#946#947#948#949#950#951#952#953#954#955#956#957#958#959#960#961#962#963#964#965#966#967#968#4910#4911#4912#4913#4914#4915#4916#4917#4918#4919#4922#4923#4924#4925#4926#4927#4928#4929#4930#4931#4920#4921#2015#2013#2014#2012#436#437#2010#2011#2001#2002#2003#2004#2005#2006#2007#2008#2009#2017#2019#2020#2021#2022#2023#2024#2025#2026#2027#2032#2033#2034#2035#2036#2037#2038#2039#2040#2041#2042#2043#2044#2045#2046#2047#2048#2049#2050#2051#2052#2053#2054#2055#2056#2057#2058#2059#2060#2061#2062#2063#2064#2065#2066#2067#4991#12006#12004#12003#12001#12000#12005#39#38#172356.57364.65355.26354.41350.29349.97345.85344.22347.58337.05339.28334.96331.83341.54330.93338.37348.31337.55330.97326.69325.73326.00328.67328.61335.22327.89345.91344.28340.29326.74329.88327.78327.8645.00328.92329.73327.83330.30329.1645.00338.28334.13325.16325.27322.64327.53322.59323.98329.06329.66325.44324.59321.10320.82316.19313.85324.17320.41323.64325.22329.76325.29316.91315.62313.07269.65268.53269.44269.44270.08292.53291.11227.27271.57351.61349.34343.68344.40294.16294.85292.95293.52294.68297.12295.06292.11266.70266.38266.04265.65265.26264.69266.68266.51265.99265.82265.47264.91267.20266.72266.41266.17265.72265.13265.93265.72PT 261 8" TREE -NO TAG ???EXISTINGGARAGECONCFF 265.66GATEW/ BATH18" x 29" OVAL CMPFL= 258.0818" CMP FL=258.64TOP = 260.14TOP = 259.58wl markinggas line markREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MONREC MON108109103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113103104105106107108109110111113....................................................320310330340350TOPTOPTOETOPxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDYHxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHYDWVWVWVWVWVTOP OFTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCK$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCKSTO PSTOP$AUDIT_BAD_BLOCKHYDH YDWVWVWV WVWVWVHYDHY DWVWVWVL=85.51'%%128=22°47'17"R=215.00'PROPOSED HOUSETITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017SITE PLANA2.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"1SITE PLAN UPA+WWWWB.O.2"∅ SS1.5"∅ SS2"∅ SS2"∅ SS#995511" COASTLIVE OAK/2#36720" COAST LIVE OAK/3#36623" COAST LIVE OAK/3#994919" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995620" VALLEY OAK/4#365/995018", 11"COAST LIVE OAK/3#995216", 11" COAST LIVE OAK/3#995113" COAST LIVE OAK/2EX. 2" DIA SSEX. 2" DIA SSINV=265.2'EX. SSLATERAL3673669949365/99509955995199529956270268266262264268258256270270270260300290280270260250290310300290280270320330340330320340350330340350320310300271.93272.52GS271.42EP270.81EP271.10EP271.10EP270.60EP269.8134035635040092272.516Bs/chk3000040145286.972EP40146285.622EP40147282.827EP40148280.319EP40149273.748EP40150271.936EP40151271.138EP40152272.422EP40153280.257EP40154282.581EP40155285.850EP40156288.248EP40170272.438Bs/chk3000040183270.926GB40184271.188GB40187272.164GB40188271.607GS40190271.794GS40191271.472GS40192271.221GS40193270.38340202271.207GS40203271.059EP40207271.350EP40208271.394EP40209271.602EP40210271.530EP40211271.244EP40212271.183EP40213271.032EP40214270.429EP40217269.181EP40218269.098EP40219269.112EP40220269.546EP40225273.195EP40226270.221EP40227268.407EP40228268.237EP40229269.178EP40230269.530EP40231270.130EP40232270.450EP40233270.732EP40234271.061EP40235271.222EP40236271.512EP40237271.055EP40238270.809EP40239270.722EP40242269.658EP40243270.303EP40246272.327EP40247271.860BS/CHK 300135.5' WOOD 3-RAIL FENCE#490#489#491#497#9911#9912#30#9926#29#9924#9925#31#9929#9930#9931#9932#9933#9934#9935#9936#9944#9945#9946#9947#9948#9949#9950#9951#9952#9955#9956#9959#9960#9961#9962#9963#9965#9966#9975#9976#9977#9978#9979#9980#9981#232#236#246#259#247#280#256#234#270#293#292#4143#4147#4149#4158#4162#4163#4164#4165#4176#4177#4178#4179#4180#4181#4182#4183#4184#4185#4157#4186#4156#4150#4154#4155#4187#4188#4189#4190#4191#4192#4193#4194#4195#4196#4197#4198#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#742#743#744#745#746#747#748#749#750#751#752#753#754#755#756#757#758#759#760#761#717#718#719#32#720#721#723#724#725#726#733#734#735#736#737#738#739#740#741#513#514#515#516#517#518#519#509#530#531#532#533#534#535#37#536#537#538#539#540#541#542#543#544#546#547#567#568#569#570#36#571#35#572#573#574#575#576#577#578#579#580#586#587#588#589#590#841#842#843#844#845#846#847#848#849#850#851#852#854#855#856#857#858#859#860#861#862#863#864#865#866#867#868#869#870#871#872#873#874#875#876#877#878#931#932#933#934#935#936#937#938#939#940#941#942#946#947#948#949#950#951#952#953#954#955#956#957#958#959#960#961#962#963#964#965#966#967#968#4922#4923#4924#4925#4926#4927#4928#4929#4920#4921#12006#12004#12003#12001#12000#39#38351.11356.57364.65355.26354.41350.29349.97345.85344.22347.58337.05339.28334.96331.83341.54330.93338.37348.31349.97337.55330.97326.69325.73326.00328.67328.61335.22327.89345.91344.28340.29326.74329.88327.78327.8645.00328.92329.73327.83330.30329.1645.00338.28334.13325.16325.27322.64327.53322.59323.98329.06329.66325.44324.59321.10320.82316.19313.85324.17320.41323.64325.22329.76325.29316.91315.62313.07xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxH YDWVWVHY DWV4' - 0"PROPOSED HOUSETITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ENLARGED SITEPLANA2.121200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1ENLARGED SITE PLANREFERENCE NORTH UPREF.REF.A7.211A7.11A7.2122A7.1111A8.112A8.1111335599101013131515AAGGHHJJLLMMNNPPQQRRKK881414OO66774422BBEEFFCCDD12121111II3 1/2" / 1'-0"2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"6 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"3 1/2" / 1'-0"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017PROPOSED ROOFPLANA6.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED ROOF PLANREFERENCE NORTH TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017PERSPECTIVE VIEWSA7.001200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.PERSPECTIVE VIEWS LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"08500.ED01ENTRY DOOR1211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"RIDGE @ 18'-2"360354348342337332NATURAL GRADE -REFER TO ENGINEERS SITE PLAN -SHEET (X)35' MAX.35' MAX.GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILING35' MAX.12"REFER TO SHT. (X)48" CLEAR10' - 0"1' - 0"10' - 0"35' MAX.SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTERSEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.ED01ENTRY DOOR08500.DR01DOORS-108500.DR01DOORS-1LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"AGHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"BEFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-108500.RU01ROLL-UP DOOR09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER08500.DR01DOORS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTERCDIDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"35' MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT AT GARAGE / A.D.U. -SEE SHT. (X)35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.ENTRY FOYER ROOF340339332336332330330GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGVOID UNDER MBR.08500.DR01DOORS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-1GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGTITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ELEVATIONSEXTERIORA7.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - FRONTSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - RIGHT LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"AGHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"BEFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTER09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-108500.DR01DOORS-1CDIDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"08500.DR01DOORS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-108500.WD01WINDOWS-135' MAX.35435635435234934434033835' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX. ALLOWABLENATURAL GRADEVOIDMASTER ABOVELOWER LEVEL BEDROOMOUTDOOR COURTYARD 16' WIDESTAIRWELLGLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGGLASS + METALBALCONY RAILINGLEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"SEE ROOF PLANROOF FASCIA GUTTER09200.ECP1EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER09200.ESL1SCREED08500.WD01WINDOWS-1SEE ROOF PLANROOFING08500.DR01DOORS-1STAIR LANDING BELOW GRADE1211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"12"CLEAR48"33233033233434035035' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.35' MAX.TOP OF ROOF OF KIT -DININGSKYLT. OVER STAIRSA.D.U. OVER GARAGESTAIRWELLMASTER BATHMASTER BEDROOMDEN BEYOND + ENTRY FOYERLOWER FLOOR ALIGNS W/ MBR ABOVE22' - 6"PARAPET12' - 0"1' - 0"10' - 0"GLASS + METALBALCONY RAILING+36"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017ELEVATIONSEXTERIORA7.211200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - LEFTSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - REAR LEGEND: SECTIONS BUILDINGEXTERIOR WALL INSULATION: ALL 2X4 EXTERIOR WALL CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION: ALL 2X6 EXTERIOR WALL CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)EXTERIOR ROOF/CEILING INSULATION: INSULATION IN CEILINGS, FLOORS AND ROOF FRAME CAVITIES, SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. (TYP)07210.2X607210.CEIL07210.2X4LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"ROOF FRAMING: SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFLOOR FINISH PER SCHEDULE, TYP.UNDER FLOOR INSULATIONEXTERIOR FINISH: SEE ELEVATIONS07210.CEILCEIL. INSULATION07210.2X6EXT. WALL INSULATIONLEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"GHJLMNPQRKOLEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"EFGARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"379 SFMBED1RM252167 SFMCLOS1RM257203 SFBED4RM29445 SFVAN3RM295128 SFBED3RM296282 SFMEDIARM300323 SFBED2RM305418 SFDINING1RM319457 SFGREAT1RM320IDEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 F.F.0' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL1 PLATE10' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"LEVEL2 F.F.ELEV. 35011' -0"ROOF FRAMING: SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFLOOR FINISH PER SCHEDULE, TYP.07210.2X6EXT. WALL INSULATIONEXTERIOR FINISH: SEE ELEVATIONS07210.CEILCEIL. INSULATIONLEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL2 PLATE23' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"LEVEL3 F.F. ADUELEV. 36021' -0"1359101315814LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"LEVEL 3 PLATE30' -0"6742GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE F.F.10' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"GARAGE PLATE20' -0"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"BUILD MAX.HEIGHT34' -3 1/8"503 SFGARAGE2RM312198 SFADU-FAMILY1RM337130 SFADU-HALL1RM338132 SFADU-KITCH1RM3391211DEN PLATE20' -0"DEN PLATE20' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"ENTRY PLATE27' -0"TITLES:ISSUES:SHEET:PLAN CHECK PC01CONST. DOCUMENTSDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSCHEMATIC DESIGN.........2021.09.30Owners:EMAIL:TEL:1200 Business Center DriveSan Leandro,CA. 94577mobile: 707-410-7102david@usglland.comUSGL LAND,LLCD:\HDD\HDD PROJECTS\2021\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553\REVIT\20210607HDD USGL LAND 5 CASA DE CAMPO MARTINEZ CA 94553.rvtNEW HOME:5 CASA DE CAMPO,MARTINEZ, CA 94553RESIDENCEAPN:367-140-017SECTIONSA8.111200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,707-410-7102DAVID@USGLLAND.COMSAN LEANDRO, CA. 94577USGL LAND, LLC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1SECTION 1SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2SECTION 2 CASA DE CAMPOCR E E K S I D E O A K S Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1ALHAMBRA44680PKWY.JOHNHWY.HWY.ALHAMBRA AVE.ALHAM B R A AVE.RELIEZTAYLOR GRAYSONTO SAN JOSE TO SACRAMENTOTO ANTIOCHTO RICHMONDCASTLE CREEK CT.MUIRVALLEY RD.VALLEYBLVD .RVALLEY ALHAMBRAOAKBRIDGE LN.RD.CREEKSIDE OAKSLEGENDPROPOSEDEXISTINGABBREVIATIONSINDEX: Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Aliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 DETAILS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4DETAIL B - DISSIPATER DETAIL A - PERIMETER DRAINS 350360348346344 340330320322324326328330332334336338340342344346348352354356358362364366368CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5STRAW WATTLE FENCE DETAILCSILT TRAP DETAILBINLET PROTECTION DETAILA--- 350360 348346344340330320322324326328330332334336338340342344346348352354356358362364366368CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 3Removal due to construction Removal becuase it is deadTo remain, but work within the dripline CASA DE CAMPOAliquot Associates, Inc.1390 S. Main St. - Ste. 310Walnut Creek, CA 94596Telephone: (925) 476-2300Fax: (925) 476-2350Civil EngineersTraffic EngineersSurveyors5 CASA DE CAMPO-CREEKSIDE OAKS LOT 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6 Attachment 5 Color Board Attachment 6 Arborist Report Tree Evaluation Prepared For: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC 1200 Business Center Drive San Leandro, CA 94577 Prepared By: Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Arbor Consulting American Society of Consulting Arborists 237 Berna Avenue Napa, California 94559 (925) 525- 3795 November 3, 2021 Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 2 D ear David, Thank you for asking me to provide a Consulting Arborist Report for your Proposed new Home P roject located at 5 Casa de Campo in Creekside Oaks - in Martinez , California. I visited the site on October 31, 2021, to review the House Layout Plan provided by Aliquot Civil Engineering dated 9-25-2021, using Sheet C. The purpose of my site visit is to evaluate any impact the proposed home may on any protected trees. I reviewed a total of 36 trees that surround the proposed home that include (29) Coast Live oaks (Qurcas agrifolia), (6) Valley oaks (Quercas lobata), and (1) Bay Laurel (Laurus noblis). A majority o f the trees I ev aluated are growing above the driveway and retaining wall leading into the lot. There are (3) species of trees common to Martinez and surrounding hillsides, these are the Liv e oaks, Valley o aks and o ne Bay Tree. These trees hav e been growing in a grove amongst eac h other f or many years. As trees continue to mature they started competing for sunlight resulting in the lower trees leaning away f rom the trees above them. This resulted in 75% of the trees leaning at a 45 degrees angle towards the driveway and retaining wall. Within this grove are (5) dead trees that need to be removed before they fail. There are (8) critical trees that are leaning so severely they c annot be safely pruned, these are also recommended f or removal. The trees that are in poor c ondition have poor canopy structure and m ost of the canopy is f ull of deadwood f rom the competing trees growing above t hem . These trees are also recommended f or removal before they fail or die off creating fire hazards. Above this grove are many other trees that are in good health and far enough away from the proposed home. With all the recent fires it is recommended to remove the dead trees and any tree that can create a fire ladder. The remaining trees can be safely pruned to keep them from failing and to remove any deadwood or low hanging branches. The remaining healthy trees near the proposed new home need to be protected following the Tree Protection Guidelines below. I have attached maps that show the general location of each tree and a picture of each tree with diameter (dbh) and tree tag #. P lease review the health rating below and tree protection measures. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 3 Listed below Is the Inventory and Health of each protected tree. Tree Inventory and Health Note: Trees are measured using the DBH method – circumference, measured at 4.3 above the ground. Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 1 4157 Coast Live Oak 30/28 Poor 2 4185 Coast Live Oak 21" Poor 3 4184 Coast Live Oak 23" Poor 4 4183 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 5 4181 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 6 4177 Coast Live Oak 9" Poor 7 4176 Valley Oak 14" Poor 8 4165 Coast Live Oak 28/22 Poor 9 2765 Valley Oak 14" Fair 10 2766 Valley Oak 10/8 Poor 11 2771 Coast Live Oak 25" Fair 12 2768 Coast Live Oak 30" Dead 13 2770 Coast Live Oak 30" Poor 14 4158 Coast Live Oak 20" Poor 15 4164 Valley Oak 8" Poor 16 4162 Valley Oak 14" Poor 17 4163 Coast Live Oak 6" Poor 18 4178 Coast Live Oak 10/8 Poor 19 4179 Valley Oak 16" Fair 20 4188 Coast Live Oak 13" Poor 21 4187 Coast Live Oak 16" Poor 22 4180 Coast Live Oak 24" Poor 23 4182 Bay Laurel 8/12 Poor 24 292 Coast Live Oak 22 Critical 25 4186 Coast Live Oak 22/24/18 Critical 26 293 Coast Live Oak 19" Critical 27 4147 Coast Live Oak 14" Critical 28 4156 Coast Live Oak 8" Fair 29 4149 Coast Live Oak 13" Dead 30 4150 Coast Live Oak 20" Dead Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 4 Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 31 4143 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 32 4154 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 33 4155 Coast Live Oak 24" Critical 34 4189 Coast Live Oak 12/22 Critical 35 4197 Coast Live Oak 14/12 Dead 36 4198 Coast Live Oak 14/12/17 Dead I have been contracted by you to monitor the health of all your trees on site and to install protective fencing around the protected trees. I will be on site during any grading activity or pruning needs throughout the duration of the project. Below are the Tree Protection recommendations. Recommended Tree Protection Guidelines: All contractors including demolition, grading, and underground contractors, sub-contractors, construction superintendent and other pertinent personnel should be required to review these guidelines with the Project Arborist (PA) prior to beginning work on site. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) identifies will be installed 2’ outside of the drip-line in a half circle on all sides of the proposed home - by installing 4’ high orange protective fencing around the entire drip-line of the tree and roots from disturbance. The installation will be installed by the Project Arborist (Bob Peralta) and any work within the erected TPZ will need permission from the PA before being moved. The following signs will be posted on 8.5x11 inches and installed on all the fenc es – the sign will read: This is a Tree Protection Zone Movement of this fence requires the prior authorization of the Project Arborist & Owner (List Contact Information) Activities prohibited within the TPZ include: •Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils, ordumping of paint or poisonous materials on or around trees and roots.Poisonous materials include, but are not limited to, paint, petroleumproducts, concrete or stucco mix dirty water or any other material whichmay be deleterious to tree health. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 5 • The use of tree trunks as winch support, anchorage, as a temporary power pole, sign-post or any other similar function. • Cutting of roots by utility trenching, foundation digging, placement of curbs, trenches and other miscellaneous excavation without prior approval of the PA. • Soil disturbance or grade/drainage changes. • Materials must not be stored, stockpiled, dumped, even temporarily, inside the TPZ of protected trees. Activities permitted within the TPZ include: As needed or recommended by the PA • Irrigation, aeration, or other beneficial practices that have been specifically approved for use within the TPZ. • Mulch if needed and or fertilization as recommended by monthly site visits by the PA. • Each site visit will require a report recommending tree healthcare supplements, recommended watering as needed during peak summer months and reduction into Fall and Winter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Certified Arborist WE -7150A ASCA Consulting Arborist #505 Attachment 7 Staff’s Power Point Presentation TREE PERMIT APPEAL COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076 5 Casa de Campo, Martinez Contra Costa County Planning Commission Wednesday, April 27, 2022 6:30 P.M. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve a Tree Permit #CDTP21 -00076. Construction of residence,retaining wall,and grading requires: Removal of 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter)is because they are dead and now a firehazard. The proposed residence is two-story,4,476 square-feet with a 1,199 square-foot attachedAccessoryDwellingUnit,an 875 square-foot attached garage,and 700 square-feet of decking.The proposed development is also subject to the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan. Removal of 21 trees: 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter) 3 Valley Oaks (8,14,and 14 inches trunk diameter) 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter) Work within the dripline of 5 trees: 3 Coast Live Oaks (8,20,and 26 inches trunk diameter) 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter) GENERAL PLAN MAP Agricultural Lands (AL)SV SL SV ZONING MAP General Agricultural (A -2) R-20 R-40 A -2 AERIAL PHOTO BACKGROUND ■February 18,2022:Notice of Tentative Approval was mailed to the property owners adjacent to the subject property,and the last day to appeal was Monday,February 28. ■February 28,2022:Daniel and Sibhan Stokes (130 Oak Bridge Lane)filed an appeal. ■March 9,2022:Applicant volunteers to plant more trees and work with the Stokes on how many.The Stokes did not find this to satisfy their concerns of removing already mature, healthy trees. ■In response to the Stokes’s concerns,staff increased the amount of required tree replanting from five to ten 15-gallon indigenous Oak trees and included planting locations not only to assist in screening the building from Alhambra Valley Road,but also from 130 Oak Bridge Lane. ■Staff also added a condition to require a nesting survey if work is done within the nesting season (February 1 through August 31) RECORDED MAP SURVEY MAP SITE PLAN TREE PLAN HOUSE DESIGN HOUSE DESIGN BRIEF SUMMARY OF APPEAL POINTS ■“Removal of these healthy trees would jeopardize the stability of the soils as we live on a hillside.” ■“We chose to live in Alhambra Valley before developers arrived changing the landscape and knocking the eco-system out of balance.” ■“The arborist looked at the 26 trees in question on November 3rd when everything looks dormant and dead,before the big rains.” ■We have no interest in trading out 50-70 year old,existing protected Oaks for saplings on our property line.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the County Planning Commission DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve County File #CDTP21-00076 with the modification to the tree restitution condition and the added nesting survey condition. QUESTIONS? Department of Conservation and Development County Planning Commission Wednesday, May 25, 2022 – 6:30 P.M. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item #_____ Project Title: Tree Permit for a New Single-Family Residence on a Vacant Lot County File(s): #CDTP21-00076 Applicant: Owner: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC Zoning/General Plan: General Agricultural (A-2) / Agricultural Lands (AL) Site Address/Location: 5 Casa de Campo, Martinez / APN: 367-140-013 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Status: Categorical Exemptions – Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) - new construction or conversion of small structures Project Planner: Dominique Vogelpohl, Project Planner (925) 655-2880 Staff Recommendation: Approve (See Section II for Full Recommendation) I. PROJECT SUMMARY Continued Public Hearing: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve a Tree Permit to allow removal of 21 code-protected trees and work within the dripline of 5 code-protected trees to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot. The trees to be removed include 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (between 8-14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (between 8-26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter). There are also 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) that are requested to be removed because they are dead. II. RECOMMENDATION Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) staff recommends that the County Planning Commission: County Planning Commission – May 25, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 2 of 2 (1) DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve Tree Permit (County File #CDTP21-00076), based on the attached Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and (2) DIRECT staff to file a Notice of Exemption. III. BACKGROUND The proposed project was initially heard before the County Planning Commission (CPC) on Wednesday, April 27, 2022. The hearing was open to the public and testimony was accepted by the applicant, David Viggiano, the appellant, Daniel and Sibhan Stokes at 130 Oak Bridge Lane, Martinez, and Palmer Hill, professional landscaper for Astro Green Ventures Group, who spoke on behalf of the appellant and commented on the project’s arborist report. The Planning Commission continued this item as an open hearing to the Wednesday, May 25, 2022, CPC hearing to allow staff time to have another arborist report prepared, and reattempt to receive comments from the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association (AVIA). Staff was not able to have these requests completed in time for the May 25 CPC hearing, and requests this item be continued indefinitely until a staff report can be completed that is inclusive of all the items requested by the CPC. IV. CONCLUSION Staff finds that the proposed development is consistent with the Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan land use designation, complies with the intent and purpose of the General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district, and also consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan residential design guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends the Zoning Administrator approve County File #CDTP21-00076, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval attached to the April 27, 2022, Staff Report. Department of Conservation and Development County Planning Commission Wednesday, June 22, 2022 – 6:30 P.M. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item #_____ Project Title: Tree Permit for a New Single-Family Residence on a Vacant Lot County File(s): #CDTP21-00076 Applicant: Owner: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC Zoning/General Plan: General Agricultural (A-2) / Agricultural Lands (AL) Site Address/Location: 5 Casa de Campo, Martinez / APN: 367-140-013 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Status: Categorical Exemptions – Class 3: CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) - new construction or conversion of small structures Project Planner: Dominique Vogelpohl, Project Planner (925) 655-2880 Staff Recommendation: Approve (See Section II for Full Recommendation) I. PROJECT SUMMARY Continued Public Hearing: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve a Tree Permit to allow removal of 21 code-protected trees and work within the dripline of 5 code-protected trees to develop a single-family residence on a vacant lot. The trees to be removed include 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (between 8-14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and work within the dripline of 3 Coast Live Oaks (between 8-26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter). There are also 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) that are requested to be removed because they are dead. II. RECOMMENDATION Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) staff recommends that the County Planning Commission: County Planning Commission – June 22, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 2 of 3 (1) DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the Zoning Administrator’s decision to approve Tree Permit (County File #CDTP21-00076), based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached to the April 27, 2022, Staff Report; and (2) DIRECT staff to file a Notice of Exemption. III.BACKGROUND The proposed project was initially heard before the County Planning Commission (CPC) on Wednesday, April 27, 2022. The hearing was open to the public and testimony was accepted by the applicant, David Viggiano, the appellant, Daniel and Sibhan Stokes at 130 Oak Bridge Lane, Martinez, and Palmer Hill, professional landscaper for Astro Green Ventures Group, who spoke on behalf of the Stokes and commented on the project’s arborist report. The Planning Commission continued this item as an open hearing to the Wednesday, May 25, 2022, CPC hearing to allow staff time to have another arborist report prepared, and reattempt to receive comments from the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association (AVIA). At the May 25 CPC hearing, staff received clarification from the Planning Commission to not have the County require a second arborist report, but instead allow the Stokes the opportunity to provide an arborist report obtained through their own means rather than through the County. The Planning Commission continued this item as an open hearing to the Wednesday, June 22, 2022, CPC hearing to allow the Stokes time to have an arborist prepared and submitted for the Planning Commission’s consideration. The Stokes have provided an arborist report prepared by certified arborist John Traverso (WE-0206-B) of Traverso Tree Service dated June 6, 2022, which is attached to this Staff Report. The project arborist report that was prepared by Robert Peralta (#WE-7150A) of Bob Peralta Arbor Consulting dated November 3, 2021, is also attached to this Staff Report. Also, David submitted a map that was provided to developers of this subdivision to show them where to site the future homes. This map is attached to this Staff Report. With respect to the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association (AVIA), staff has been in correspondence with Leslie Ries, who is the interim President with the passing of Marie Olson. Leslie has stated the AVIA is currently inactive, but she is making efforts to have it active shortly. Staff provided her the April 27, 2022, Planning Commission staff report for this item on May 24, 2022. The last update from the AVIA prior to the preparation of this report was that a meeting was held on May 31st to regroup their board members and brainstorm ways to attract new members and promote community involvement. County Planning Commission – June 22, 2022 County File #CDTP21-00076 Page 3 of 3 Lastly, staff visited the project site on June 8, 2022. Staff has attached site photos to this Staff Report to show the path of travel to the proposed house site from the end of the driveway. IV.CONCLUSION Staff finds that the proposed development is consistent with the Agricultural Lands (AL) General Plan land use designation, complies with the intent and purpose of the General Agricultural (A-2) zoning district, and also consistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan residential design guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends the Zoning Administrator approve County File #CDTP21-00076, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval attached to the April 27, 2022, Staff Report. Attachments: 1.Appellant provided arborist report 3.Applicant provided site plotting map 4.Staff's site photos 2.Project arborist report Attachment 1 Appellant's Arborist Report June 6, 2022 Dan and Sibhan Stokes 130 Oak Bridge Lane Martinez, CA 94553 Re: Arborist Pier Review Assessment of Oaks Proposed for Removal on the 5 Casa De Campo Property Dear Mr. & Mrs. Stokes, Per your request, and approved by the county, the following arborist report is an assessment of the grove of oaks located on the undeveloped Casa De Campo property located downslope and to the east of your property. Assignment I was asked to look at a previously assessed grove of 35 native oaks and one bay that are part of an extensive oak woodland lining the west edge of the lower property to be developed. The Stokes have concerns regarding the plan to remove 26 protected oaks, and how that might affect screening between them and other homes. W hile the Stokes are not opposed to the development of the lot, they would like the design to consider saving some of the trees in an effort to retain more of the screening. Introduction / Observations The project arborist (PA) for the development had inventoried 35 native oaks and one bay laurel back in October of 2021. Only 4 trees were given a fair rating, and all the rest were rated as poor (19), critical (8), or dead (5). It was recommended to remove the 26 trees that are dead, or in critical to poor condition. The basis for the recommendations are to reduce fire fuel loads by removing the dead trees or trees in poor condition that will become a greater fire concern as they decline. Critical trees were described as those with heavy leans that could pose a risk to the property. It is my opinion that the arborist looked at each tree individually and not as being part of a grove. This would reduce both their health and structural ratings. Trees with phototropic leans due to the adjacent over-story canopies adapt over the years and are less likely to fail as would an isolated tree that leans. In addition leaning trees with no targets placed under them are not considered a risk. I also observed a few trees that appeared to be miss-rated or miss-identified in the report. Tree #293 listed as a 19" coast live oak in critical condition is actually a multi-stemmed tree measuring 19", 17", 15", & 12". The tree is actually one of the healthiest trees in the grove, and although it does have co-dominant leader attachments, that defect could easily be mitigated with some minor pruning and or cabling. Tree #4198 is listed as being dead and is actually in fairly good condition. Tree #2770 listed as a 30" oak is only 11" in diameter and is right next to a 30" oak that has no tag. There are at least 7 other trees that I would upgrade their conditions to fair from critical or poor. Traverso Tree Service Phone: 925-930-7901 • 4080 Cabrilho Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 • Fax: 925-9723-2442 Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Discussion Although none of these trees are uniquely special on their own accord, as a grove they work together as a nice woodland habitat that provides valuable screening from existing homes below as well as the proposed home location. As far as fire concerns, there are a few dead trees and some large lower dead branches and understory grasses that could be removed to reduce fuel load and help beautify the grove. I am not sure of the development constraints on this lot, however, it would seem that a combination of fewer removals and a slight adjustment of the home location might provide the opportunity to preserve enough of this grove to retain some valuable screening. Recommendation I recommend reducing the total number of trees removed down to 12, consisting of the dead trees #2768, 4149, 4150, 4197, two trees leaning heavily over road (#4143 & 4147), as well as live trees # 4157, 4181, 4182, 4183, 4184, & 4185 along the east edge of the grove. The last 6 removals are to accommodate an adjusted building footprint. Limits of grading would need to be reduced as well to respect the root zones of trees to remain. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this assessment, and please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Tree map and photos attached. Sincerely, John C Traverso ISA Board Certified Master Arborist #WE-0206-B ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified ISA Certified Climber Specialist #WE-0206T Traverso Tree Service Phone: 925-930-7901 • 4080 Cabrilho Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 • Fax: 925-9723-2442 -2- Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Tree #293 listed as being in critical condition and only 19" in diameter. -3-John C Traverso, BCMA Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Trees #497 & 498 both listed as dead. Tree #498 is healthy with a phototropic lean that could be pruned a bit to make more pleasing and lesson end weight. This tree would help with screening and erosion as well. -4-John C Traverso, BCMA Arborist Review, 5 Casa De Campo June 6, 2022 Grove of trees approved for removal. Canopies provide screening of lower home to the left from the Stokes residence up slope to the right. -5-John C Traverso, BCMA Attachment 2 Project Arborist Report Tree Evaluation Prepared For: David Viggiano USGL Land, LLC 1200 Business Center Drive San Leandro, CA 94577 Prepared By: Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Arbor Consulting American Society of Consulting Arborists 237 Berna Avenue Napa, California 94559 (925) 525- 3795 November 3, 2021 Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 2 D ear David, Thank you for asking me to provide a Consulting Arborist Report for your Proposed new Home P roject located at 5 Casa de Campo in Creekside Oaks - in Martinez , California. I visited the site on October 31, 2021, to review the House Layout Plan provided by Aliquot Civil Engineering dated 9-25-2021, using Sheet C. The purpose of my site visit is to evaluate any impact the proposed home may on any protected trees. I reviewed a total of 36 trees that surround the proposed home that include (29) Coast Live oaks (Qurcas agrifolia), (6) Valley oaks (Quercas lobata), and (1) Bay Laurel (Laurus noblis). A majority o f the trees I ev aluated are growing above the driveway and retaining wall leading into the lot. There are (3) species of trees common to Martinez and surrounding hillsides, these are the Liv e oaks, Valley o aks and o ne Bay Tree. These trees hav e been growing in a grove amongst eac h other f or many years. As trees continue to mature they started competing for sunlight resulting in the lower trees leaning away f rom the trees above them. This resulted in 75% of the trees leaning at a 45 degrees angle towards the driveway and retaining wall. Within this grove are (5) dead trees that need to be removed before they fail. There are (8) critical trees that are leaning so severely they c annot be safely pruned, these are also recommended f or removal. The trees that are in poor c ondition have poor canopy structure and m ost of the canopy is f ull of deadwood f rom the competing trees growing above t hem . These trees are also recommended f or removal before they fail or die off creating fire hazards. Above this grove are many other trees that are in good health and far enough away from the proposed home. With all the recent fires it is recommended to remove the dead trees and any tree that can create a fire ladder. The remaining trees can be safely pruned to keep them from failing and to remove any deadwood or low hanging branches. The remaining healthy trees near the proposed new home need to be protected following the Tree Protection Guidelines below. I have attached maps that show the general location of each tree and a picture of each tree with diameter (dbh) and tree tag #. P lease review the health rating below and tree protection measures. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 3 Listed below Is the Inventory and Health of each protected tree. Tree Inventory and Health Note: Trees are measured using the DBH method – circumference, measured at 4.3 above the ground. Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 1 4157 Coast Live Oak 30/28 Poor 2 4185 Coast Live Oak 21" Poor 3 4184 Coast Live Oak 23" Poor 4 4183 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 5 4181 Coast Live Oak 17" Poor 6 4177 Coast Live Oak 9" Poor 7 4176 Valley Oak 14" Poor 8 4165 Coast Live Oak 28/22 Poor 9 2765 Valley Oak 14" Fair 10 2766 Valley Oak 10/8 Poor 11 2771 Coast Live Oak 25" Fair 12 2768 Coast Live Oak 30" Dead 13 2770 Coast Live Oak 30" Poor 14 4158 Coast Live Oak 20" Poor 15 4164 Valley Oak 8" Poor 16 4162 Valley Oak 14" Poor 17 4163 Coast Live Oak 6" Poor 18 4178 Coast Live Oak 10/8 Poor 19 4179 Valley Oak 16" Fair 20 4188 Coast Live Oak 13" Poor 21 4187 Coast Live Oak 16" Poor 22 4180 Coast Live Oak 24" Poor 23 4182 Bay Laurel 8/12 Poor 24 292 Coast Live Oak 22 Critical 25 4186 Coast Live Oak 22/24/18 Critical 26 293 Coast Live Oak 19" Critical 27 4147 Coast Live Oak 14" Critical 28 4156 Coast Live Oak 8" Fair 29 4149 Coast Live Oak 13" Dead 30 4150 Coast Live Oak 20" Dead Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 4 Map ID Tag Tree Tag # Species DBH Health 31 4143 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 32 4154 Coast Live Oak 12/14 Critical 33 4155 Coast Live Oak 24" Critical 34 4189 Coast Live Oak 12/22 Critical 35 4197 Coast Live Oak 14/12 Dead 36 4198 Coast Live Oak 14/12/17 Dead I have been contracted by you to monitor the health of all your trees on site and to install protective fencing around the protected trees. I will be on site during any grading activity or pruning needs throughout the duration of the project. Below are the Tree Protection recommendations. Recommended Tree Protection Guidelines: All contractors including demolition, grading, and underground contractors, sub-contractors, construction superintendent and other pertinent personnel should be required to review these guidelines with the Project Arborist (PA) prior to beginning work on site. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) identifies will be installed 2’ outside of the drip-line in a half circle on all sides of the proposed home - by installing 4’ high orange protective fencing around the entire drip-line of the tree and roots from disturbance. The installation will be installed by the Project Arborist (Bob Peralta) and any work within the erected TPZ will need permission from the PA before being moved. The following signs will be posted on 8.5x11 inches and installed on all the fenc es – the sign will read: This is a Tree Protection Zone Movement of this fence requires the prior authorization of the Project Arborist & Owner (List Contact Information) Activities prohibited within the TPZ include: •Storage or parking vehicles, building materials, refuse, excavated spoils, ordumping of paint or poisonous materials on or around trees and roots.Poisonous materials include, but are not limited to, paint, petroleumproducts, concrete or stucco mix dirty water or any other material whichmay be deleterious to tree health. Bob Peralta- I.S.A. Certified Arborist #WE7150A ASCA #505 5 • The use of tree trunks as winch support, anchorage, as a temporary power pole, sign-post or any other similar function. • Cutting of roots by utility trenching, foundation digging, placement of curbs, trenches and other miscellaneous excavation without prior approval of the PA. • Soil disturbance or grade/drainage changes. • Materials must not be stored, stockpiled, dumped, even temporarily, inside the TPZ of protected trees. Activities permitted within the TPZ include: As needed or recommended by the PA • Irrigation, aeration, or other beneficial practices that have been specifically approved for use within the TPZ. • Mulch if needed and or fertilization as recommended by monthly site visits by the PA. • Each site visit will require a report recommending tree healthcare supplements, recommended watering as needed during peak summer months and reduction into Fall and Winter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bob Peralta Bob Peralta Certified Arborist WE -7150A ASCA Consulting Arborist #505 Attachment 3 Applicant's Site Plotting Map Attachment 4 Staff's Site Photos TREE PERMIT APPEAL COUNTY FILE #CDTP21-00076 5 Casa de Campo, Martinez Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Tuesday, October 11, 2022 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Removal of 5 additional trees: 5 Coast Live Oaks (between 13-43 inches trunk diameter) Appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve the following: Removal of 21 trees: 17 Coast Live Oaks (between 6.5-64 inches trunk diameter), 3 Valley Oaks (8, 14, and 14 inches trunk diameter), and 1 Bay Laurel (20 inches trunk diameter), and Work within the dripline of 5 trees: 3 Coast Live Oaks (8, 20, and 26 inches trunk diameter) and 2 Valley Oaks (14 and 16 inches trunk diameter) For the construction of a residence, retaining wall, and grading. New single-family residential development is permittable pursuant to Tract 7609 Creekside Oak Estates Subdivision (County File #SD90-7609) approved by the County Board of Supervisors on November 11, 1994. Because they are dead and now a fire hazard. GENERAL PLAN MAP Agricultural Lands (AL)SV SL SV ZONING MAP General Agricultural (A -2) R-20 R-40 A -2 AERIAL PHOTO BACKGROUND ■February 28, 2022: Daniel and Sibhan Stokes (130 Oak Bridge Lane) filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s approval. ■April 27, 2022: Heard before the County Planning Commission (CPC) and continued to June 22, 2022, to allow the Stokes to provide a separate arborist report, and reattempt to receive comments from the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association (AVIA). ■June 22, 2022: The Stokes provided an arborist report prepared by certified arborist John Traverso (WE-0206-B), and the AVIA provided a letter of opposition. After discussing this new testimony, the CPC denied the appeal and approved the project. ■July 5, 2022: The Stokes filed an appeal of the CPC decision. ■November 11, 1994: Tract 7609 Creekside Oak Estates Subdivision (County File #SD90-7609) approved by the County Board of Supervisors. The final map was recorded on January 29, 2004, and the amended final map was recorded on May 4, 2010. ■February 18, 2022: Tree Permit tentatively approved by the County Zoning Administrator. ■November 30, 2021: Tree Permit County File #CDTP21-00076 filed with the County Planning Department to develop Lot #3 with a single-family residence. STAFF ANALYSIS The anticipated building site was established under the subdivision approval for Creekside Oak Estates as seen in Figure 2 of the Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan, Creekbank –Riparian Habitat Setback Verification Plan,and Tree Impact Analysis report prepared by WES Technology Corp dated July 15,1993. The building site is also dictated by the restricted development area easement.The restricted development area is a product of the Rural Residential Development “Ranchette”policy as it relates to major subdivisions. The project site is consistent with the building area depicted in the figure diagrams approved under the Creekside Oak Estates subdivision and the “Ranchette”policy in that the proposed building envelope and grading areas are outside of the deeded restricted development area. The subdivision that created the subject lot took retaining the natural landscape into consideration and designed prospective building sites accordingly.The subdivision established the area where the house is proposed to be the least impactful with the recording of the restricted development area easement and the road design. The road and driveway were already constructed with the creation of the subdivision,so the house site is already predetermined. This development is outside the restricted development area easement and at the end of the already constructed road,resulting in the least amount of grading and tree removal. RECORDED MAP Figure 2 of the Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan, Creekbank –Riparian Habitat Setback Verification Plan, and Tree Impact Analysis report prepared by WES Technology Corp dated July 15, 1993 SURVEY MAP SITE PLAN TREE PLAN HOUSE DESIGN STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the County Board of Supervisors DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the Planning Commission’s decision to approve County File #CDTP21-00076. Tree Removal Permit Appeal County File # Appeal CDTP21-00076 Vincent A. Moita, Esq. 1 Planning History 2 Timeline – Creekside Oaks – Subdivision Development 1992 Alhambra Valley Specific Plan Adopted 1994 Creekside Oaks Subdivision Vesting Tentative Map •July 15, 1993 - W.E.S. Technology Corporation Tree Impact Analysis & recommendation included as COA to VTM. 2004 Amended Subdivision Map • HortScience Tree Study Preservation Report 2019 New Home Construction in Creek Side Oaks •Tree removal permit •Granted, no objection 2021 Application for New House Construction •Tree Permit Granted by Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development •CDTP21-00076 2021 February Initial Appeal filed 2022 June Planning Commission Appeal Supplemental Arborist Tree Study 2022 June Planning Commission Denial of Appeal Today Board of Supervisors Appeal 10-11-2022 3 •Environment: •Goal #1: Preserve and enhance both the natural and man-made environment in Alhambra Valley. •Policy 3: •Hilltops, ridges, rock outcroppings, mature stands of trees and other natural features shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible in the design of new projects. •New Development •Goal 1: Allow development in accord with the goals and policies of the Countywide General Plan as it pertains to Alhambra Valley. •Policy 2: •Ensure that the applicable rules for environmental protection are applied to both major and minor subdivisions. Alhambra Valley Specific Plan Adopted October 6, 1992 4 1994 Creekside Oaks Vesting Tentative Map Approval with COA’s 5 Contra Costa County GIS Approved Creekside Oaks Subdivision Creekside Oaks subdivision VTM 6 Approximate Building Pads overlain on Contra Costa County GIS Vesting Tentative Map Approved 1994 with Conditions of Approval based upon the following reports: 7 Approximate Building Pads overlain on Contra Costa County GIS. Creek Preservation and Enhancement Plan W.E.S. Technology Corporation at pg. 11 filed July 15, 1993 with Contra Costa County Tree Impact Analysis – Section 4.2 Tree Impact Location #6 •“The Driveway of Lot 3 should parallel the existing roadbed and the Lot 3 site should be moved downhill, out of the major tree mass to the extent feasible (Location #6)” 8 Affirmed Building pads 2004 VTM Amendment. Approximate Building Pads with new tee groves overlain on Contra Costa County GIS 9 Amended Subdivision Map 7609 Creekside Oak Estates filed 1-29-2004 Approved Grading Plans Following original VTM’s Location 6 guidance on avoiding tree massing. 10 Amended Subdivision Map 7609 Creekside Oak Estates filed 1-29-2004 Approved Grading Plans Following original VTM’s Location 6 guidance on avoiding tree massing. Trees Delineated on grading plan to save. 11 2003 HortScience Tree Survey Designating Trees fit for preservation Future Heritage Trees #293, #4143, #4157, #4197, #4198 12 Following COA, Heritage Trees were designated and Deed Restricted in 2003 Red shows Heritage Trees affected by current project’s tree removal permit Heritage Trees #293, #4143, #4157, #4197, #4198 13 Conflicting Evidentiary Basis: Arborist Reports 14 2021 Arborist Report – Submitted By Project Applicant’s Arborist 15 2021 Arborist Report – Submitted By Project Applicant’s Arborist Heritage Trees recommended for removal. No discussion or disclosure of heritage tree status. 16 2022 Arborist Peer Review– Submitted By Appellant Denotes factually incorrect evidence submitted by project applicant, upon which the Zoning Administrator relied in making Findings. It is my opinion that the arborist looked at each tree individually and not as being part of a grove. This would reduce both their health and structural ratings. Trees with phototropic leans due to the adjacent over-story canopies adapt over the years and are less likely to fail as would an isolated tree that leans. In additionleaning trees with no targets placed under them are not considered a risk. I also observed a few trees that appeared to be miss-rated or miss-identified in the report. Tree #293 listed as a 19" coast live oak in critical condition is actually a multi-stemmed tree measuring 19", 17", 15", & 12". The tree is actually one of the healthiest trees in the grove, and although it does have co-dominant leader attachments, that defect could easily be mitigated with some minor pruning and or cabling. Tree #4198 is listed as being dead and is actually in fairly good condition. Tree #2770 listed as a 30" oak is only 11" in diameter and is right next to a 30" oak that has no tag. There are at least 7 other trees that I would upgrade their conditions to fair from critical or poor. 17 2022 Arborist Peer Review– Submitted By Appellant Trees *#1498 & *#1497 Trees #298 18 Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Findings 19 Staff Report – CDTP21-00076 20 816-6.8010(A) – Determination that the trees are in poor health and cannot be saved is inconsistent with the supplemental Arborist Report. 816-6.8010(G) – Reasonable development could be made on the lot as the 2004 grading plan & site pad proposes. The proposed site cuts directly into the tree mass, incongruent with the planned 2004 building site pads located below the tree line. This is inconsistent with the Alhambra Valley Specific Plan Environmental Goal 1, Policy 3. Appellant Commentary - Inconsistent Proposed Site Plan & Visual Impact 21 2004 Grading Plan 22 2022 Proposed Project Project Applicant Subject Site Plan overlain on VTM Grading Map Approximate location 23 Contra Costa County GIS 24 Contra Costa County GIS 2004 Approved Grading Plan overlain approximate location 25 Contra Costa County GIS 2004 Grading Plan with current project showing trees to be removed with approximate location. 26 Contra Costa County GIS With Site Plan showing trees to be removed and affected approximate canopy 27 Contra Costa County GIS Showing affected approximate canopy 28 Aerial Image from Stokes Property Line Photo taken September, 2022 29 Aerial Image showing approximate site plan with approximate affected canopy removal based on Tree Removal Permit 30 Aerial Image showing approximate site plan with approximate affected canopy removal based on Tree Removal Permit 31 Aerial Image showing approximate canopy removal based on Tree Removal Permit 32 Canopy Viewshed from Stokes property looking East / Northeast. 33 Visual Impact of upholding Tree Removal Permit Approximate canopy affected. 34 Request to Overrule Tree Removal Permit County File # Appeal CDTP21-00076 Allow developer to resubmit plans consistent with planning goals and policies and preserve deed restricted heritage trees 35 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER a position of "Support" on Proposition 30: Provides Funding For Programs To Reduce Air Pollution And Prevent Wildfires By Increasing Tax On Personal Income Over $2 Million. Initiative Statute. A YES vote on this measure means: Taxpayers would pay an additional tax of 1.75 percent on personal income above $2 million annually. The revenue collected from this additional tax would support zero-emission vehicle programs and wildfire response and prevention activities. A NO vote on this measure means: No change would be made to taxes on personal income above $2 million annually. FISCAL IMPACT: Summary of Major Fiscal Effects by state Legislative Analyst APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, (925) 655-2057 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Consideration of Support for Proposition 30 (2022) FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) and state Director of Finance: "Increased annual state tax revenue ranging from $3 billion to $4.5 billion, with the additional revenue used to support zero-emission vehicle programs and wildfire-related activities. Potential increased state administrative costs paid from other funding sources that could reach tens of millions to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Net decrease in state and local transportation revenue of up to several tens of millions of dollars annually in the initial years, and growing to up to a few hundreds of millions of dollars annually after several years." BACKGROUND: Proposition 30. Provides Funding for Programs to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Increasing Tax on Personal Income Over $2 Million. Initiative Statute. From the Legislative Analyst's Office : BACKGROUND California Personal Income Taxes. The state collects a tax on personal income earned within the state. Last year, the personal income tax raised over $130 billion in revenue. Most of the revenue helps pay for education, prisons, health care, and other public services. Zero-Emission Vehicle Programs. The state has goals to limit greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change, such as carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels. To help meet these goals, the state has programs that promote zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs)—or vehicles that do not release pollution from the tailpipe. Examples of ZEVs include electric cars and hydrogen fuel cell cars. The state requires ride-sharing companies (such as Uber and Lyft) to use an increasing number of ZEVs for their services. The state also gives some funding to help households, businesses, and governmental agencies buy new ZEVs and install fueling infrastructure, such as charging stations for electric cars. Wildfire Response and Prevention Programs. The state has the main responsibility for wildfire response activities—commonly known as firefighting—on about one-third of California’s land area. (The federal government and local agencies have the main responsibility for wildfire response everywhere else in California.) Wildfire response activities help limit the spread of large wildfires and stop them from damaging communities and harming residents. The state also runs wildfire prevention programs to reduce the chances that wildfires will start and to limit the damage they cause when they do occur. Some examples of wildfire prevention activities include removing trees from overgrown forests and clearing dead plants that are likely to catch on fire in areas near buildings. PROPOSAL Creates a New Tax on High-Income Taxpayers Beginning January 2023, Proposition 30 requires taxpayers with incomes above $2 million each year (annually) to pay an additional tax of 1.75 percent on the share of their income above $2 million. This additional tax would end by January 2043. The tax could end several years earlier if California is able to drop its statewide greenhouse gas emissions below certain levels before then. Uses Revenue to Expand ZEV Programs and Wildfire Activities Proposition 30 requires that the revenue from the new tax go to increasing funding for ZEV programs and wildfire activities, as shown in Figure 1. The money would go to several state agencies to manage the programs and activities. ZEV Programs (80 Percent). About 80 percent of the total revenue is for two ZEV program categories: Payments to Help Buy New Vehicles. Most of this money must be used to help households, businesses, and governments pay for part of the cost of new passenger ZEVs (such as cars, vans, and pick-up trucks). The rest of the money would be available for other programs. These include payments to businesses and governments to help buy large ZEVs (such as trucks and buses) and programs that encourage less driving and improve local air quality. Charging Stations. This money would be used to install and operate ZEV charging and fueling stations at places such as apartment buildings, single-family homes, and public locations. For each category above, at least half of the money must be spent on projects that benefit people who live in or near heavily polluted and/or low-income communities. The rest of the money could be spent on projects anywhere in the state. Wildfire Response and Prevention Activities (20 Percent). About 20 percent of total revenue must be spent on wildfire response and prevention activities. In general, the state would have to prioritize spending to hire, train, and retain state firefighters. The rest of the money could be used for other wildfire response and prevention activities. ===================================================== Support and Opposition According to Ballotpedia: "Yes on 30: Clean Air California" is leading the campaign in support of Proposition 30. It has received endorsements from the California State Association of Electrical Workers and California Environmental Voters. Two other committees also registered in support of Proposition 30: "Yes on 30: Working Families and Environmental Voters to Expose Greedy Billionaires and CEOs" and "California Environmental Voters Issues Committee." Together the committees reported over $37.1 million in contributions. Lyft was the top contributor with $15 million in contributions. Bill Magavern, one of the authors of the initiative, said, "We need to protect the health of Californians. California needs to step up to protect its own. The state is doing a lot to reduce harmful emissions but the budget, even with the governor making the commitment he has, is insufficient to address these problems." The measure is also endorsed by the following organizations: Bay Area Air Quality Management District American Lung Association California Democratic Party State Building and Construction Trades Council Association of Bay Area Governments Metropolitan Transportation Commission There is one committee registered in opposition to Proposition 30: No on 30. The committee Metropolitan Transportation Commission There is one committee registered in opposition to Proposition 30: No on 30. The committee reported $11.5 million in contributions. Proposition 30 has received opposition from Gov. Newsom, the California Teachers Association, and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. Gov. Newsom said, "Prop. 30 is a special interest carve-out — a cynical scheme devised by a single corporation to funnel state income tax revenue to their company. … Californians should know that just this year our state committed $10 billion for electric vehicles and their infrastructure." For more information about the measure, see Attachment A: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board meeting information. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Gretchen Newsom, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); Augustina Olman; No name given; William Muetzenberg, ; Sandra Lowe, City of Sonoma; Oscar Garcia, California EnviroVoters; Caller 6770. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: BAAQMD Board Meeting Material Bay Area Air Quality Management District Consideration of Proposition 30 (2022) AGENDA: 16 Board of Directors Meeting September 21, 2022 Alan Abbs Legislative Officer aabbs@baaqmd.gov Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Presentation Outcome Staff will provide an overview of Proposition 30 –the “Clean Cars and Clean Air Act” – appearing on the November 8, 2022, Statewide General Election Ballot. 2 Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Presentation Outline 3 •Summary •Ballot Initiative Timeline •Program Allocation • Support/Opposition • Discussion Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Presentation Requested Action Recommend the Board of Directors (Board) discuss and consider taking a position on Proposition 30 (2022). 4 Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Summary •A YES vote on this measure means: Taxpayers would pay an additional tax of 1.75 percent on personal income above $2 million annually. The revenue collected from this additional tax would support zero-emission vehicle programs and wildfire response and prevention activities. •A NO vote on this measure means: No change would be made to taxes on personal income above $2 million annually. 5 Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Ballot Initiative Timeline •November 5, 2021 –Ballot Initiative #21-0037 filed. •January 10, 2022 –Signature drive allowed to begin with signatures due on July 11, 2022. •Signatures Needed: 623,212 •Final random sample count concluded that 720,238 of the 990,608 submitted signatures were valid. •June 28, 2022 –the Secretary of State reported that the initiative had qualified for the November 8, 2022, Statewide General Election Ballot. 6 Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Program Allocation 7 *Both accounts can be spent on suppression and prevention programs defined in the measure. The CalFire General Account prioritize s suppression for the first six years (with up to 25% of funds spent on prevention), after which the relative allocation is discretionary. Program (Fund)Focus Areas Program Allocation Focus Area Minimum Allocation ZEV Infrastructure Program (ZEV investment plan) Multifamily Charging 35% of total revenue 20% Single-Family Charging 10% Fast-Fueling ZEVs 10% M/HD ZEV Fueling 10% ZEV Affordability Program (ZEV & Clean Mobility Fund) Passenger ZEVs 45% of total revenue 67% M/HD ZEV & Non-Vehicle Mobility 33% Reducing Wildfire GHG Program (RWGP) (RWGP Fund) Fire Marshal P&S Account*20% of total revenue 25% CAL FIRE General Account*75% Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Support Officials: 50+ Elected Local, State, and Federal Officials, including Congress Members Khanna and Lee; State Senators Wieckowski and Wiener; State Assembly Members Haney, Mullin, R. Rivas, Stone, Wicks, and Wilson; and Mayors Arreguin, Breed, Ezzy Ashcraft, Liccardo, and Schaaf. Corporations: 20+ Corporations, including Lyft, Rivian, and ChargeNet. Unions: California State Association of Electrical Workers, State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, California State Pipe Trades Council, among others. Organizations: California Environmental Voters, Coalition for Clean Air, Natural Resources Defense Council, Brightline Defense, SPUR, American Lung Association, among others. *This is a non-exhaustive list. 8 Attachment A Bay Area Air Quality Management District Opposition Officials •Governor Gavin Newsom Unions •California Teachers Association Organizations •Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association •California Chamber of Commerce *This is a non-exhaustive list. 9 Attachment A RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/355 approving the Side Letter Agreements between the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and IAFF, Local 1230 and the United Chief Officers Association addressing terms and conditions of employment for current City of Pinole fire suppression staff who become employed by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District as a result of the contract for fire protection services. FISCAL IMPACT: The side letters present no additional costs to the District. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (Con Fire) intends to enter a contract for fire protection services with the City of Pinole and offer employment to current Pinole Fire Department fire suppression staff. The side letters reflect the terms and conditions of employment for employees of Pinole Fire Department fire suppression staff who choose to accept employment with Con Fire. Employees will retain hire and promotion dates as outlined in the side letters, as well as the specific placement on the salary schedule for the respective unions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Sanford, (925) 655-2070 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Side Letters with IAFF, Local 1230 and the United Chief Officers Association addressing impacts of the contract for service with the City of Pinole. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The side letter also addresses the status of the new employees, their accrual banks and vacation accrual caps, and information on benefits open enrollment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employees from City of Pinole may not start their employment at Con Fire with the appropriate terms and conditions of employment. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/355 UCOA Side Letter 1230 Side Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/355 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 10/11/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/355 In the Matter of: The Side Letter Agreements between the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and IAFF, Local 1230 and the United Chief Officers Association addressing terms and conditions of employment for current City of Pinole fire suppression staff who become employed by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District as a result of the contract for fire protection services. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as the governing board of the County of Contra Costa and the Board of Directors for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District RESOLVES THAT: The attached Side Letters of Agreement between the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and IAFF, Local 1230 and the United Chief Officers Association, be ADOPTED. Contact: David Sanford, (925) 655-2070 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the Board of Supervisors has reconsidered the circumstances of the Statewide state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, and the Countywide local emergency proclaimed by the Board of Supervisors on March 10, 2020. 2. FIND that the following circumstances exist: (a) the Statewide state of emergency and the Countywide local emergency continue to directly impact the ability of the Board of Supervisors in all its capacities, its committees, and its advisory bodies to meet safely in person because the highly transmissible Omicron variant of COVID-19 and its subvariants are present in the County, and within the County the COVID-19 community transmission rates remain high; and (b) the County Health Officer's recommendations for safely holding public meetings, which recommend virtual meetings and other measures to promote social distancing, are still in effect. 3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Supervisors, in its capacity as the governing board of the County, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and the Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, and its subcommittees, to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days. 4. AUTHORIZE all advisory bodies, committees, and commissions established by the Board in all its capacities, including but not limited to municipal advisory councils and the Measure X Community Advisory Body, to continue teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days. 5. REQUIRE advisory bodies, commissions, and committees whose jurisdiction extends into all Supervisorial districts ("Countywide bodies") that hold in-person meetings to conduct these meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the Countywide body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. 6. ENCOURAGE advisory bodies whose jurisdiction does not extend into all Supervisorial districts ("limited jurisdiction bodies") to conduct any live meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the limited jurisdiction body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mary Ann McNett Mason, County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Mary Ann McNett Mason, County Counsel, Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors D.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Continuing Teleconference Meetings (AB 361, Government Code § 54953(e)) RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) 7. REQUEST that the Planning Commission, Merit Board, and Assessment Appeals Board consider holding teleconference meetings under Government Code section 54953(e) for the next 30 days or holding meetings in a "hybrid" format that permits members of the body, staff, and members of the public to access the meetings both remotely and in person. 8. DIRECT the County Administrator/Clerk of the Board and staff to the various Board advisory bodies to take all actions necessary to implement the intent and purpose of this Board order, including conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and all other applicable provisions of the Brown Act. 9. DIRECT the County Administrator/Clerk of the Board to return to the Board acting in all its capacities, no later than 30 days after this Board order is adopted, with an item to reconsider the state of emergency and whether to continue authorizing virtual meetings under the provisions of Government Code section 54953(e) and to make required findings as to all bodies covered by this Board order. FISCAL IMPACT: This is an administrative action with no direct fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On October 5, 2021, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2021/327, which authorized the Board, in all its capacities, and certain subcommittees and advisory bodies, to conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e). This section of the Brown Act, which was added by Assembly Bill 361, allows a local agency to use special teleconferencing rules during a State declared state of emergency. When a legislative body uses the emergency teleconferencing provisions under Government code section 54953(e), the following rules apply: The agency must provide notice of the meeting and post an agenda as required by the Brown Act and Better Government Ordinance, but the agenda does not need to list each teleconference location or be physically posted at each teleconference location. The agenda must state how members of the public can access the meeting and provide public comment. The agenda must include an option for all persons to attend via a call-in or internet-based service option. The body must conduct the meeting in a manner that protects the constitutional and statutory rights of the public. If there is a disruption in the public broadcast of the meeting, or of the public's ability to comment virtually for reasons within the body's control, the legislative body must stop the meeting and take no further action on agenda items until public access and/or ability to comment is restored. Local agencies may not require public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and must allow virtual comments to be submitted in real time. The body must allow a reasonable amount of time per agenda item to permit members of the public to comment, including time to register or otherwise be recognized for the purposes of comment. If the body provides a timed period for all public comment on an item, it may not close that period before the time has elapsed. AB 361 sunsets on January 1, 2024. Under Government Code section 54953(e), if the local agency wishes to continue using these special teleconferencing rules after adopting an initial resolution, the legislative body must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency every 30 days and make certain findings. The agency must find that the state declared emergency continues to exist and either that it continues to directly impact the ability of officials and members of the public to meet safely in person, or that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. The Board last considered these matters on September 13, 2022, made the required findings and authorized continued use of special teleconferencing rules. The Board can again find that the Statewide state of emergency continues to exist, that the state and Countywide local emergencies continue to directly impact the ability of the Board of Supervisors in all its capacities, and its subcommittees, and advisory bodies to meet safely in person, and that state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. The Public Health Officer has advised that the highly transmissible Omicron variant of COVID-19 and its subvariants are present in the County, and the COVID-19 community transmission rate remains high. High amounts of COVID-19 are also showing up in wastewater surveillance data. In addition, on October 4, 2022, the County Health Officer again issued recommendations for safely holding public meetings that included recommended measures to promote social distancing. (See Attachment A, Health Officer's Recommendations). Among the Health Officer's recommendations: (1) on-line meetings (teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged as those meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19; (2) if a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended when possible to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person; (3) a written safety protocol should be developed and followed, and it is recommended that the protocol require social distancing - i.e., six feet of separation between attendees; (4) seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times; and (5) all meeting attendees should be strongly encouraged to wear masks and to be up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board, in all its capacities, and its subcommittees and advisory bodies, would no longer conduct teleconferencing meetings under Government Code section 54953(e). CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: No name given. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A, Health Officer’s Recommendations Recommendations for safely holding public meetings Each local government agency is authorized to determine whether to hold public meetings in person, on-line (teleconferencing only), or via a combination of methods. The following are recommendations from the Contra Costa County Health Officer to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission during a public meeting. 1. Online meetings (i.e. teleconferencing meetings) are encouraged, where practical, as these meetings present the lowest risk of transmission of SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID 19. This is particularly important when community prevalence rates are high. Our current trends as of October 4, 2022 in Covid-19 case rate, test positivity, Covid-19 hospitalizations, and COVID-19 wastewater surveillance are decreasing, but community transmission, as noted in CDC community transmission map, remains high. In addition to this, the predominant variant of COVID-19 being identified continues to be the Omicron variant and it’s subvariants the impact of which on the spread of COVID-19 has shown to dramatically increase COVID-19 transmission. 2. If a local agency determines to hold in-person meetings, offering the public the opportunity to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option is recommended, when possible, to give those at higher risk of and/or higher concern about COVID-19 an alternative to participating in person. 3. A written safety protocol should be developed and followed. It is recommended that the protocol require social distancing, where feasible – i.e. six feet of separation between attendees; and consider requiring or strongly encouraging face masking of all attendees and encouraging attendees to be up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccine. 4. Seating arrangements should allow for staff and members of the public to easily maintain at least six-foot distance from one another at all practicable times. 5. Consider holding public meetings outdoors. Increasing scientific consensus is that outdoor airflow reduces the risk of COVID-19 transmission compared to indoor spaces. Hosting events outdoors also may make it easier to space staff and members of the public at least 6 feet apart. If unable to host outdoors, consider ways to increase ventilation and flow of the indoor space to reduce the risk of COVID-19 while indoors. 6. Current evidence is unclear as to the added benefit of temperature checks in addition to symptom checks. We encourage focus on symptom checks as they may screen out individuals with other Covid-19 symptoms besides fever and help reinforce the message to not go out in public if you are not feeling well. 7. Consider a voluntary attendance sheet with names and contact information to assist in contact tracing of any cases linked to a public meeting. Revised 10-4-2022 Sefanit Mekuria, MD, MPH Deputy Health Officer, Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/343 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Whyte Park Avenue between Bridge Road and Center Street; Center Street between Whyte Park Avenue and terminus; and Panoramic Way between Olympic Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue, between October 12, 2022 and January 31, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., daily, for the purpose of installing approximately 3,295 feet of 6-inch and 8-inch water main and appurtenances, Walnut Creek area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact BACKGROUND: Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. The road closures are necessary for traffic safety due to the existing road widths and the location of the pipeline within the road. The closures will enable East Bay Municipal Utility District to complete their pipeline installation in a more safe and timely manner. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry, 925.374.2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander, CHP C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize to fully close a portion of Whyte Park Avenue between October 12, 2022 and January 31, 2023, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/343 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/343 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 10/11/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/343 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving and Authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Whyte Park Avenue between Bridge Road and Center Street; Center Street between Whyte Park Avenue and terminus; and Panoramic Way between Olympic Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue, between October 12, 2022 and January 31, 2023 from 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., daily, for the purpose of installing approximately 3,295 feet of 6-inch and 8-inch water main and appurtenances, Walnut Creek area. (District II) RC22-23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to East Bay Municipal Utility District to fully close Whyte Park Avenue between Bridge Road and Center Street; Center Street between Whyte Park Avenue and terminus; and Panoramic Way between Olympic Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, between October 12, 2022 and January 31, 2023 for the period of 7:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., daily, subject to the following conditions: Traffic will be detoured via roads identified in a traffic control plan, reviewed by the Public Works Department Transportation Division. Emergency vehicles, residents within the construction area and essential services will be allowed access as required. 1. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 2. East Bay Municipal Utility District shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County.3. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability, which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 4. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District.5. Contact: Bob Hendry, 925.374.2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander, CHP RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/345 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Wanda Street, except for emergency traffic, on October 15, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First (1 st) Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Crockett Chamber of Commerce is seeking a road closure for the 1st Annual Oktoberfest Festival. This is a free event and will include live music, seating, and dancing space. Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry, (925).374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander, CHP C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize to fully close 2nd Ave., between Ceres St. & Wanda St. on October 15, 2022, Crockett area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/345 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/345 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 10/11/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/345 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving and Authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Wanda Street on October 15, 2022 from 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of the First Annual Oktoberfest Festival, Crockett area. (District V) RC22-22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESPOLVED that permission is granted to Crockett Chamber of Commerce to fully close 2nd Avenue between Ceres Street and Wanda Street, except for emergency traffic, local residents, US Postal Service and garbage trucks, on October 15, 2022 for the period of 6:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions: Traffic will be detoured per traffic control plan reviewed by the Public Works Department.1. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.2. Crockett Chamber of Commerce shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County.3. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 4. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District.5. Contact: Bob Hendry, (925).374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander, CHP RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/347 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS19-00003, for a project being developed by HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for minor subdivision MS19-00003 and has determined that all conditions of approval for Parcel Map approval have been satisfied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Parcel Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett, 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS19-00003, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/347 Parcel Map Subdivision Agreement & Improvement Security Bond Tax Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/347 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 10/11/2022 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/347 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS19-00003, for a project being developed by HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (District II) WHERE AS, the following documents were presented for board approval this date: I. Map The Parcel Map of minor subdivision MS19-00003, property located in the Walnut Creek area, Supervisorial District II, said map having been certified by the proper officials. II. Subdivision Agreement A subdivision agreement with HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within 2 years from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows: A. Cash Bond Performance amount: $1,360.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. 856451 Date: September 23, 2022 Submitted by: HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC B. Surety Bond Bond Company: Arch Insurance Company Bond Number: 1185507 Date: June 2, 2022 Performance Amount: $134,640.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $68,000.00 Principal: HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC III. Tax Letter Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 2021-2022 tax lien has been paid in full and the 2022-2023 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of January 2022, is estimated to be $15,860.00, with security guaranteeing payment of said tax lien as follows: Tax Surety Auditor's Deposit Permit Number: DP855346 Date: September 1, 2022 Amount: $15,860.00 Amount: $15,860.00 Submitted by Principal: HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans. 2. That said Parcel map is APPROVED and this Board does hereby accept subject to installation and acceptance of improvements on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. 3. That said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. Contact: Larry Gossett, 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Chris Lau - Maintenance, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, HD 2063 Walnut Creek LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/348 accepting completion of improvements, accepting right of way dedication, and approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Road Improvement Agreement for development plan permit DP14-03041 for a project developed by IPT Richmond DC III LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, North Richmond area. (District I) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The developer has completed the improvements per the Road Improvement Agreement, and in accordance with the project’s Conditions of Approval. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of improvements will not be accepted, the right of way dedication will not be accepted, and the performance bond amount will not be reduced. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Gossett, 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Francisco Avila- DCD, IPT Richmond DC III LLC, Argonaut Insurance Company, T-08/11/2023 C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting completion of public improvements & accepting right of way dedication for DP14-03041, North Richmond area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2022/348 Decrease Rider MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2022/348 Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board Return To:Public Works Dept- Simone Saleh THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 10/11/2022 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2022/348 IN THE MATTER OF accepting completion of improvements, accepting right of way dedication, and approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Road Improvement Agreement for development plan permit DP14-03041 for a project developed by IPT Richmond DC III LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, North Richmond area. (District I) WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in development plan permit DP14-03041 have been completed as provided in the Road Improvement Agreement with IPT Richmond DC III LLC, heretofore approved by this Board. WHEREAS, these improvements are approximately located near Pittsburg Avenue, and Richmond Parkway. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the road improvement agreement and are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE as of October 11, 2022, thereby establishing the six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Road Improvement Agreement: DATE OF AGREEMENT: February 9, 2021 NAME OF SURETY: Argonaut Insurance Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $430,000.00, Bond No. SUR0064991 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six-month lien guarantee period until April 11, 2023, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the widening of Pittsburg Avenue is ACCEPTED and DECLARED to be a County road as shown and dedicated for public use and conveyed by separate instrument recorded on November 18, 2021, recording series number 2021-0319670 and 2021-0319671, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the beginning of the warranty period is hereby established, and the $8,600.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 822207, dated January 22, 2021) made by IPT Richmond DC III LLC, and the performance/maintenance surety bond rider for $129,000.00, Bond No. SUR0064991 issued by Argonaut Insurance Company RETAINED pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code until release by this Board. Contact: Larry Gossett, 925.313.2016 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Records, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Lau - Maintenance, Randolf Sanders- Design & Construction, Francisco Avila- DCD, IPT Richmond DC III LLC, Argonaut Insurance Company, T-08/11/2023 RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to apply for and/or accept state assistance in the form of the California Department of Water Resources Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Grant in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for design, permitting, construction and monitoring of the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage Implementation Project, North Richmond area. FISCAL IMPACT: Grant amount request is not to exceed $1,500,000 from California Department of Water Resources IRWM Grant. No matching funds are required by this IRWM Grant since the project would serve the disadvantaged community of north Richmond. Other funding received for this project includes a grant from California Department of Water Resources Urban Streams Restoration Program in the amount of $784,775. On September 13, 2022, the Board also approved a grant application in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund. (Project No. 7505-6F8101) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gus Amirzehni, (925) 313-2128 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Gus Amirzehni, Flood Control, Beth Balita, Finance, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 5 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Wildcat Creek Fish Passage Implementation Project — California Department of Water Resources Integrated Regional Water Management Grant. BACKGROUND: The FC District owns and manages the Wildcat Creek flood control structure and the fish ladder structure constructed by the Corps of Engineers in the 1990s. The FC District is currently conducting a planning process that seeks to retrofit the existing fish ladder and replace it with a more natural design to improve fish passage. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is seeking high-quality grant proposals for multibenefit ecosystem restoration and protection projects that lead to the restoration of important species and habitat. The Wildcat Creek Fish Passage Implementation Project is expected to be a good match for the goals of the DWR IRWM Grant; thus the FC District recommends submitting an application. If the California DWR ultimately decides to award an IRWM Grant to the project, the FC District will return to the Board for subsequent approval of the grant agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the Board of Supervisors’ approval, the FC District will not be able to apply for the California Department of Water Resources IRWM Grant. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE actions by the County Administrator, or her designee, in the case In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, to execute, on behalf of Contra Costa County, agreements which will allow attorneys’ fees to be paid from settlement funds from the National Opioid Settlement and cap fees owed by the County up to Five Percent (5%) of settlement funds received, approve bankruptcy plans of certain defendants, file a complaint against McKinsey & Co., approve settlement with Special Districts, and take related actions. FISCAL IMPACT: Contra Costa County’s obligation to pay attorneys’ fees will be reduced from 18% to 5% of settlement funds. The County may receive additional funds from defendants’ bankruptcy plans, and possible settlements with McKinsey & Co. and Special Districts. BACKGROUND: This litigation was brought by the County and other public entities in California against opioid manufacturers and distributors to recover costs incurred from the opioid epidemic. Two settlement agreements have been reached with national distributors and one manufacturer. Payments from the settlements will begin this year and continue over 18 years. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: County Counsel I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation U.S.D.C., Northern District of Ohio 1:17-md-02804-DAP BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On August 6, 2021, the U.S. District Court issued an order which allows outside counsel to apply to the National Settlement Fund for partial reimbursement of attorneys’ fees incurred in bringing the litigation. In light of the order, the County’s outside counsel has agreed to reduce its contingency fees owed by the County from Eighteen Percent (18%) to Five Percent (5%) of settlement funds received. To effect this change, the County must sign a Backstop Agreement. The Backstop Agreement also allows the County to use funds that it receives from the settlement to pay outside counsel. This action will also allow the County Administrator, or her designee, to authorize the Claims Fund Administrator to withhold 5% of settlement funds to be set aside for attorneys’ fees. Some defendants in the litigation are in bankruptcy proceedings. In the future, the County will need to approve the recommended bankruptcy plans in order to receive funds from those defendants. McKinsey & Co., a national management consulting firm, played a role in the opioid crisis by advising manufacturers and distributors on increasing sales of opioids. Public entities which have sued McKinsey have obtained settlements. Filing suit against McKinsey will allow the County to receive additional settlement funds. Two healthcare districts in California did not sign the settlement agreement with the national distributors, which reduced the overall recovery by the State and the counties from the national settlements. Some public entities are contemplating a settlement with those healthcare districts by which they would join the national settlement, thus increasing the funds to all counties. Joining that settlement will increase funds to the County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not be able to use Opioid settlement funds to pay its attorneys’ fees. The County may be obligated to pay fees up to 18% of the amount recovered pursuant to its contract with outside counsel. The County will not receive possible additional funds from defendants’ bankruptcies and settlements with other parties. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE County Counsel, or designee, to enter into a tolling agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company related to its claim for refund of property taxes for tax years 2018/19 through 2021/22. FISCAL IMPACT: No negative fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On or about April 27, 2022, Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) submitted to a claim for refund of property taxes pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 5097 (“Claim for Refund”). Through the Claim for Refund, Union Pacific contests the statutory tax rate applied to its railway property for each tax year since 2018/2019. On this basis, Union Pacific requests that the Board of Supervisors direct the Auditor-Controller to refund the sum of $488,326.67, plus appropriate interest, in property taxes levied for the fiscal years 2018/19 through 2021/22. On June 7, 2022, the Board of Supervisors denied as untimely any claims Union Pacific was asserting through the Claim for Refund based on tort or contract law. However, the Board has not yet taken action on Union Pacific’s tax-related claims asserted in the Claim for Refund. Union Pacific bases its Claim for Refund on the holding of APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, (925) 655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: Rebecca Hooley, Assistant County Counsel, Bob Campbell, Auditor-Controller C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Tolling Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Co. Regarding its Property Tax Refund Claim BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) BNSF Railway Co. v. County of Alameda (9th Cir. Aug. 5, 2021) 7 F.4th 874, which found that federal law prohibits imposition of the statutory unitary tax rate on BNSF’s railroad property to the extent that it exceeds the average countywide tax rate. Because Union Pacific’s railroad property was taxed at the statutory unitary tax rate for 2018/19 through 2021/22, Union Pacific claims that it is entitled to a refund to the extent the taxes it paid exceeded the amount it would have paid in taxes if the average countywide tax rate had been used. While BNSF Railway Co. remains good law, the decision concerned taxes paid by BNSF and it did not invalidate the statutory unitary tax rate. To resolve whether the statutory unitary tax rate may be applied to Union Pacific’s railway properties, Union Pacific plans on commencing an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (“Federal Action”) by the end of November 2022. To provide the parties with sufficient time to resolve whether the statutory unitary tax rate may be applied to Union Pacific’s railway properties, Union Pacific has proposed that the parties enter into a tolling agreement. Under the terms of the proposed tolling agreement, (1) Contra Costa will not deny the Claim for Refund until 30 days after judgment in a Federal Action becomes final, or the tolling agreement is cancelled with 30-days prior written notice by one of the parties; (2) the parties agree to waive and agree not raise an argument based on the tolling period or take any legal action related to the Claim for Refund during the tolling period; and (3) Union Pacific waives any claim for the recovery of prejudgment interest from the date Union Pacific filed the Claim for Refund, including but not limited to interest under Revenue and Taxation Code section 5151. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to take this action may result in the County paying interest on the Claim for Refund from the time the Claim for Refund was filed through the tolling period. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022, as recommended by County Counsel. FISCAL IMPACT: Settlement amounts are listed below. BACKGROUND: One agreement to settle pending litigation, as defined in Government Code section 54956.9, became final during the period of September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022. Kellie M. Smith v. County of Contra Costa, CCC Sup. Ct. Case No. C21-00712. On September 20, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved a settlement in this employment case involving the Employment and Human Services Department. The Board authorized settlement in the amount of $287,500, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, in closed session by a 4-0 vote, Supervisor Burgis absent. The Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund will provide $187,500 of the settlement funds, and the Employment and Human Services Department will provide the remaining $100,000. The settlement agreement was fully executed on September APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Thomas Geiger, 925-655-2200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: Thomas Geiger, Chief Assist. County Counsel, Karen Caolie, Risk Manager C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of September 1, 2022, through September 30, 2022 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 21, 2022. This report includes final settlements of litigation matters handled by the Office of the County Counsel. This report does not include litigation settlements that were reported by the Risk Management Division of the County Administrator’s Office as a consent item on the Board’s open session agenda. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The report would not be accepted. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad, 925-655-2350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:In the Matter of Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/331 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/331 In the Matter of Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Whereas, BART’s Mission is to provide safe, reliable, clean, quality transit service for riders; and WHEREAS, in 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connection between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent congestion on the Bay Bridge; and WHEREAS, in 1957, the California Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District and was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation; and WHEREAS, in 1962, the voters narrowly approved a $792 million bond to finance a 71.5-mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in three counties: Contra Costa, Alameda and San Francisco; and WHEREAS, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million and it would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry; and WHEREAS, BART construction officially began on June 19, 1964; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 1972, the first 28-mile segment of the system between the Fremont and MacArthur stations opened for service; and WHEREAS, on January 29, 1973, the second segment opened between Oakland to Richmond, which extended the operating system to 39 miles and 18 stations; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 1973, the Concord line opened adding 17 miles; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 1973, the 7.5-mile San Francisco line with eight stations opened; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 1974, Transbay service began, representing a major milestone in placing the full original 71.5-mile system in operation; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 1976, the Embarcadero Station opened; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 1996, the Pittsburg/Bay Point Station opened which completed a 7.8-mile extension from the Concord Station; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2003, BART opened a new line to the San Francisco International Airport, which included the South San Francisco, San Bruno and Millbrae Stations; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2014, the people mover extension opened between the Coliseum Station and Oakland International Airport; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2018, the eBART/extension to Antioch connected BART to Pittsburg and Antioch in Contra Costa County using Diesel Multiple Unit vehicles on standard-gauge track; and WHEREAS, pre-pandemic, BART carried more than twice the people per hour through the Transbay Tube than used the Bay Bridge and carried over half the passenger miles traveled on transit in the region; and WHEREAS, BART connects with 18 of the 26 regional transit operators; and WHEREAS, Today, Bart has 131 miles of track, 817 rail cars, 50 stations and 39 miles of tunnels; and WHEREAS, for 50 years, BART has provided fast, reliable transportation to downtown offices, shopping centers, tourist attractions, entertainment venues, universities and other destinations for Bay Area residents and visitors. Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognizes BART on their 50thanniversary Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognizes BART on their 50thanniversary and applauds their dedication to transporting our residents and interconnecting the Bay Area. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2022/351 proclaiming October 2022 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Resolution is not adopted, members of the public may not receive important information about domestic violence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-5052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marla Stuart, Employment and Human Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Domestic Violence Awareness Month ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/351 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/351 Proclaim October 2022 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month WHEREAS, domestic violence is a prevalent social problem significantly impacting the health and well-being of Contra Costa residents; and WHEREAS, the crime of domestic violence violates an individual’s privacy, dignity, security and humanity due to the systematic use of physical, emotional, sexual, psychological and economic control and/or abuse; and WHEREAS, the impact of domestic violence is wide-ranging, directly affecting people of all genders, sexual orientations, ages, racial, ethnic, cultural, social, religious, and economic groups in the United States and here in California; and WHEREAS, domestic violence is the third leading cause of homelessness among families in the United States; and WHEREAS, it is the survivors of domestic violence themselves who have been at the forefront of efforts to bring peace and equality to the home; and WHEREAS, all residents of Contra Costa County should feel safe in their homes, their schools, and their community; and WHEREAS, the domestic violence-related calls for assistance data shows in 2021 a total of 2,771 domestic violence related calls for service were received by Contra Costa Law Enforcement Agencies and out of which 864 involved the use of a weapon; and WHEREAS, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one in 11 female teens and one in 15 male teens reported experiencing sexual dating violence in the last year. WHEREAS, STAND! for Families Free of Violence is committed to promoting safe and strong families; providing a complete spectrum of prevention, intervention, and treatment programs, while also enlisting the efforts of local residents, partners, and institutions, all of whom are striving to stop domestic violence and child abuse; and WHEREAS, STAND! For Families Free of Violence receives 12,000-15,000 Crisis Calls annually, and served nearly 250 adults and 120 children survivors in emergency shelter, and 2,000 in community last year in Contra Costa County. WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Alliance to End Abuse works to interrupt the generational, traumatic and progressive cycle of violence by fostering partnerships, and numerous public and private agencies provide services and support to families and individuals experiencing domestic violence including County Departments, law enforcement jurisdictions, advocacy organizations and community based agencies; and WHEREAS, the County works to raise awareness so individuals will become advocates, and will take action to prevent domestic violence in their communities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby proclaim OCTOBER 2022 as DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH, and urges all residents to actively participate in the efforts to end domestic violence in our homes, in our schools, and in our communities. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad, 925-655-2350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Supporting the local, state, and federal efforts to exonerate the Port Chicago 50 ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/344 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/344 In the matter of supporting the local, state, and federal efforts to exonerate the Port Chicago 50 WHEREAS, on July 17, 1944, there was a large waterfront munitions explosion at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine which killed more than 320 sailors, over 200 of whom were African American; and WHEREAS, the explosion also injured 390 others, including 226 African American enlisted men; and WHEREAS, before the explosion, these men were working significant hours with munitions continuously being loaded despite little to no training; and WHEREAS, the specific cause of the explosion was never officially determined by a court of inquiry, and the blame was placed on the shoulders of the men who died in the explosion; and WHEREAS, when ordered to return to loading ammunitions, over two hundred sailors refused to return to work due to the unsafe working conditions; and WHEREAS, these sailors courageously advocated for safety for themselves and others by requesting adequate training and equipment before returning to work, and in response, the Navy identified fifty Black sailors as the leaders of the organized action; and WHEREAS, the Navy charged these individuals with mutiny, and this decision resulted in one of the most significant mutiny trials in U.S. military history; and WHEREAS, the fifty sailors were supported by then NAACP Chief Counsel Thurgood Marshall who through the press raised the racist nature of the trial and called into question the Navy’s segregationist policies; and WHEREAS, this trial was a major catalyst for the United States Navy to desegregate following the war; and WHEREAS, the outcome of the trial wrongly convicted the Port Chicago 50 of mutiny, and they were sentenced to prison; and WHEREAS, Mr. Marshall’s appeal of their convictions was officially denied; and WHEREAS, there have been several attempts over the years to appeal the decision, but all have failed; and WHEREAS, starting in the 1990s, Congressman George Miller worked to preserve the history of the Port Chicago 50 and worked towards their exoneration, and in 1992, his legislation designated the site of the Port Chicago Naval Magazine as a national memorial, which is managed by the National Park Service; and WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District received part of the Concord Naval Weapons Station through a Public Benefit Conveyance on July 19, 2019, and has named the park the Thurgood Marshall Regional Park – Home of the Port Chicago 50, which honors the courage and legacy of the Port Chicago 50 and all those who sacrificed their lives in our nation’s ongoing struggle for social justice, racial equality, and workers’ rights; and WHEREAS, in 2022, Congressman Mark DeSaulnier (CA-11) successfully passed a measure that would direct the Secretary of the United States Navy to publicly exonerate the Port Chicago 50, and this effort was included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (H.R. 7900) which passed the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 329-to-101. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby support these and all efforts to exonerate the Port Chicago 50 and recognize their service to our country; and Now, be it further resolved that the Board of Supervisors recognize the efforts that this case presents in our nation’s struggle for social justice, racial equity, and workers’ rights. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad, 925-655-2350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:In the matter of recognizing the John Muir Community Health Fund on the Occasion of its 25th Anniversary ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/352 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/352 In the matter of recognizing the John Muir Community Health Fund on the Occasion of its 25th Anniversary WHEREAS, the John Muir Community Health Fund was established in 1997 when the John Muir Medical Center and Mt. Diablo Health Care District merged to form the John Muir Health System. The John Muir Health System established and funded an independent Community Benefit Corporation; and WHEREAS, the Board of the John Muir Community Health Fund is comprised of three representatives appointed by the City of Concord, and two representatives appointed by the City of Pleasant Hill and five members appointed by the John Muir Association: and WHEREAS, the John Muir Community Health Fund’s mission is to distribute grants and partner with community-based nonprofit organizations to create sustainable health initiatives that expand and enhance health care and wellness services for those most in need in Central and East Contra Costa County; and WHEREAS, over their 25-year history, the John Muir Community Health Fund has distributed over $31.5 million in grant funding to over 100 community-based nonprofit organizations that have delivered essential, health-related services to hundreds of thousands of Contra Costa residents; and WHEREAS, the John Muir Community Health Fund has worked to support the creation of partnerships that have been recognized by the State of California and nationally, such as the “Healthcare Careers Pathway,” a partnership between Empowered Aging, Opportunity Junction, Mt. Diablo Adult Education, the Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano, and Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa, which has expanded, with a $5.5 million dollar grant from the State of California, to five additional counties in California; and WHEREAS, the John Muir Community Health Fund has evolved from supporting organizations that deliver direct medical care to building lasting relationships with community-based nonprofit organizations that address the social determinants of health and systemic racism leading to better health outcomes and better quality of life for our community; and WHEREAS, the John Muir Community Health Fund has shown, by its actions and good works for the past 25 years, that it is a significant asset to the community, providing leadership, building partnerships and funding projects that have greatly benefited the area and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved, that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby recognize the John Muir Community Health Fund’s 25 th anniversary and honors their achievements made to our community and commend the organization for its wonderful heritage and bright future. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lewis T. Broschard III, Fire Chief (925) 941-3300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:2022 Firefighter of the Year ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2022/361 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2022/361 Recognizing John Martinez as the 2022 Firefighter of the Year WHEREAS, Firefighter John Martinez consistently adheres to the Fire District's core values of Service, Teamwork, Professionalism, Leadership, Safety and Preparedness, and Integrity; and WHEREAS, Firefighter John Martinez' work performance has been consistently outstanding; and WHEREAS, Firefighter John Martinez, while dealing with the stresses of the very demanding nature of the fire service, has stood up to his cancer diagnosis with poise and an inspiring resolve; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Martinez, in keeping with the highest honors and traditions of the Fire District, has demonstrated diligence, perseverance, and devotion to our citizens and his fellow firefighters; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Martinez has been selected by his peers as the 2022 Firefighter of the Year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, recognizes, congratulates and thanks the 2022 Firefighter of the Year, John Martinez. ___________________ KAREN MITCHOFF Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ DIANE BURGIS FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Bethallyn Black to the Director 2 seat and Walter Pease to the Director 5 seat on the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District Board of Directors to new four-year terms expiring on November 30, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to a 1998 Resource Conservation District (RCD) resolution ordering that all future directors shall be appointed by the County Board of Supervisors in lieu of election (Public Resources Code Section 9314), the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors makes appointments to the RCD. The RCD is a state legislated special district whose mission is to carry out natural resources conservation projects through voluntary and cooperative efforts. The RCD is a non-regulatory agency that works with individuals, growers, ranchers, public agencies, non-profit organizations and corporations to accomplish its mission. The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service provides APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauren Hull, (925) 655-2007 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE CONTRA COSTA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) technical support for the RCD's programs. On November 30, 2022, the terms of office for two of the five RCD Director seats will expire: Directors 2 and 5. The RCD Board of Directors adopted Resolutions 2022-12a and 2022-12b recommending the reappointment of Bethallyn Black and Walter Pease. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seats will not be filled. ATTACHMENTS RCD Recommendation (Resolution 2022-12a) RCD Recommendation (Resolution 2022-12b) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Adey Teshager to the At-Large 6 Seat on the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls for a term ending February 28, 2026, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls (CCCWG) was formed to educate the community and advise the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on issues relating to the changing social and economic conditions of women in the County, with particular emphasis on the economically disadvantaged. The Commission's mission is, “to improve the economic status, social welfare, and overall quality of life for women in Contra Costa County.” The Commission consists of 15 members and one Alternate At-Large member including: five district representatives (one from each supervisorial district), ten At-Large members, and one Alternate. At the September 26, 2022 Family and Human Services Committee meeting, the Committee recommended the appointment of Adey Teshager to the At-Large 6 Seat on the CCCWG for a term expiring February 28, 2026. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lara DeLaney, (925) 655-2057 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:FAMILY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to appoint a member is likely to reduce public participation in advising policy development. ATTACHMENTS A. Teshager Application Redacted CCCWG Roster Submit Date: Mar 09, 2022 First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Email Address Employer Job Title Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile District Locator Tool Resident of Supervisorial District: District 1 Length of Employment 3 years Do you work in Contra Costa County? Yes No If Yes, in which District do you work? 6 How long have you lived or worked in Contra Costa County? 5 years Are you a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces? Yes No Board and Interest Which Boards would you like to apply for? Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls: Submitted Adey Teshager Richmond CA 94801 Safe Return Project Community engagement organizer Adey Teshager Seat Name reentry service rep Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Yes No If Yes, how many meetings have you attended? 0 Education Select the option that applies to your high school education * G.E.D. Certificate College/ University A Name of College Attended merritt/ccc/laney Degree Type / Course of Study / Major General studies. Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Name of College Attended Fashion Instatute for Design &Merchandising. Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Marketing/fashion designing Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University C Name of College Attended n/a Adey Teshager Upload a Resume Degree Type / Course of Study / Major n/a Degree Awarded? Yes No Other Trainings & Occupational Licenses Other Training A richard boyd fellowship 2019 Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Other Training B Spadework-dismantling systems of oppression Certificate Awarded for Training? Yes No Occupational Licenses Completed: Qualifications and Volunteer Experience Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, commitee, or commission. I have been homeless in ccc and have the lived experiences of those coming home from incarceration.I believe i would be helpfull to bridging the gaps to better serve those folks facing homelessness once they come home.I have been able to succesfully intergrate back in my community and have ideas of whats needed in terms of programs and services that could be of help. Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this application) i have volenteered to door knock,survey and speak publicly about my experiences during and after homelessness Adey Teshager Would you like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which you may be qualified? Yes No Do you have any obligations that might affect your attendance at scheduled meetings? Yes No If Yes, please explain: Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board? Yes No If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you are currently serving: If Yes, please also list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served: List any volunteer or community experience, including any advisory boards on which you have served. I have volenteered to door knock ,text bank ,survey ,speak on voluntarily . Conflict of Interest and Certification Do you have a familial or financial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships listed under the "Important Information" section below or Resolution No. 2021/234) Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Adey Teshager Please Agree with the Following Statement I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and undersand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand that misstatements and/or omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. I Agree Important Information 1. This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government Code §6250-6270). 2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County. 3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: (1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and (2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 5. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month. 6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. 7. As indicated in Board Resolution 2021/234, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors' member in any of the following relationships: (1) Mother, father, son, and daughter; (2) Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; (3) Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; (4) Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297; (5) The relatives, as defined in 1 and 2 above, for a registered domestic partner; (6) Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov't Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. Adey Teshager Richmond , CA 94801 ADEY TESHAGER OBJECTIVES My objectives are to create a healthy equitable environment in CCC for those impacted directly or indirectly by our justice systems and To Impact my community to invest in building a base of power at the political,sociological and economic levels;addressing the root causes of poverty and the impact that the criminal justice system has had on the quality of lives of black and people of color I am dedicated to creating an equitable and healthy environment for Contra Costa County resident’s young and old returning home from incarceration by engaging them in the community through research,base building and community organizing. My goal is to educate our communities on the needs of those returning home from incarceration based on my own lived experiences among others and to be of service by transforming systems that impact our lives by shifting the dominant narratives in communities that receive and serve that population. SKILLS DEVELOPED: ➢Excellent verbal and written communication skills. ➢Able to Develop, organize, and execute special events that engage directly impacted communities, Allies, partners,volunteers and other key stakeholders. ➢Able to Track and report both quantitative and qualitative data, such as leadership attendance, success stories, and program modifications ➢Excellent time management skills and ability to multitask and prioritize work. ➢Professionalism EXPERIENCE: ➢Supporting organizers on campaigns ○Base building efforts as needed ○Facilitation of Workshops ○Presentations ➢Support the development of new organizing fellowship participants Reentry Success Center, 912 McDonald Ave Richmond CA,94801 JOB TITLE —Alpha Cohort Participant. 2018-2019 -GRADUATE ●Asst admin with office tasks ○Organized Professional closet ○Daily lunch preps ●Attend daily programming ○Financial literacy ○Resume writing ○Job search ●Created artwork for restorative circles ○Wall Tapestry ○Mosaic Mural ○Our cohort was Published in the SF chronicle 2019 Safe Return Project, 1011 McDonald Ave Richmond CA,94801 JOB TITLE —Richard Boyd Empowerment Fellowship-Fella. 2019 -2020 ●Organizing training ●Collective impact ●Political education ●Policy advocacy ●Participatory action research ●City council ●Community advisory board for AB109 funding Safe Return Project, 1011 McDonald Ave Richmond CA,94801 JOB TITLE —Community Engagement Organizer/Organizer 2020 -2021 ●Identify pipelines of prospective new partners ●Engage with the business community by networking, participating in local meetings, and building relationships across multiple sectors ●Prepare materials and effectively deliver presentations to prospective Ally partners highlighting the work and goals of Safe Return Project. ●Ensure partners have a thorough understanding that the Safe Return Project is committed to providing a meaningful leadership development and work experience for those impacted by criminalization. ●Understand interests and needs of current leaders, and Ally partners and steward relationships by providing high-quality customer service, timely communication, and support for intern supervision ●Maintain partner data in contact management software; ensure necessary information is communicated Safe Return Project, 1011 McDonald Ave Richmond CA,94801 JOB TITLE —Community Engagement Organizer/Office Management/ 2021-Present ●Community engagement Organizer ○Support the development of new organizing fellowship participants ■Facillilate RBF program workshops and curriculums ■Facilitate collective impact institute. ■Interview new fellowship cohort candidates . ○Travel to Local, National, and Statewide conferences, events, and speaking engagements ○Travel on behalf of staff and executive director for srp engagements. ○Photocopy and print out documents needed on behalf of other colleagues ●Ensure operation of equipment by completing preventive maintenance requirements: ○Calling for repairs ○Maintaining equipments ○Manage Multiple Inventories ○Maintain Inventory stock supplies to determine inventory levels ○Anticipating needed supplies placing and expediting orders. ○Verifying receipt of supplies ○Evaluating new equipment and techniques. ○Photocopy and print out documents on behalf of other colleagues ○Coordinate repairs for office equipments EDUCATION BERKELEY HIGH SCHOOL OAKLAND TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL LANEY COLLEGE MERRITT COLLEGE CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE FASHION INSTITUTE OF DESIGN AND MERCHANDISING (FIDM)SAN FRANCISCO. FASHION INSTITUTE OF DESIGN AND MERCHANDISING (FIDM)LOS ANGELES. AWARDS/CERTIFICATES OF TRAININGS ●OFFICE OF CONGRESSMAN MARK DESAUNIER ●OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISOR JOHN GOGOIA ●OFFICE OF SENATOR NANCY SKINNER ●SPADEWORK REFERENCES: 1. Tamisha Walker a. 2. Chala Bonner a. 3. Laketch Mekonnen a. Seat/Position Name Term begins Term ends District I Joey Smith 3/1/2019 2/28/2023 District II Marilyn Cachola Lucey 4/27/2022 2/28/2023 District III Shauna Polk 3/23/2022 2/28/2026 District IV Vacant District V Kirsten Upshaw 8/10/2021 2/28/2025 At Large 1 Vacant At Large 2 Jennifer Rizzo 3/1/2021 2/28/2025 At Large 3 Dayanna Macias-Carlos 3/1/2019 2/28/2023 At Large 4 Lanita Mims-Beal 3/1/2021 2/28/2025 At Large 5 Catherine Jones 4/13/2022 2/28/2026 At Large 6 Vacant At Large 7 Faye Maloney 3/1/2021 2/28/2025 At Large 8 Shailaja Dixit 9/15/2020 2/28/2023 At Large 9 Vacant At Large 10 Destiny Briscoe 7/26/2022 2/28/2026 Alternate Vacant Contra Costa Commission for Women and Girls Roster RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Penny Reed to At-Large Seat #1, Shirley Krohn to At Large Seat #2, Sara Shafiabady to At-Large Seat #4, Deborah Card to At-Large Seat #5, Steve Lipson to At-Large Seat #6, Terri Tobey to At-Large Seat #10, Nuru Neemwuchalla to At-Large Seat #12, Mary Bruns to At-Large Seat #15, Kevin Donovan to At-Large Seat #17, Michael Wener to At-Large Seat #18, and Sharon “Sam” Sakai-Miller to At-Large Seat #20 on the Contra Costa Advisory Council on Aging with terms expiring September 30, 2024, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/1 to amend governing requirements and policies for making appointments to advisory bodies to the Board of Supervisors. This resolution supercedes Resolution No. 2011/497. Section III.A. of Resolution No. 2020/1, Type 2: At Large/Countywide Appointments, states that when an advisory body conducts interviews, the body’s recommendation will be provided to a Board Committee for further review, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anthony Macias, (925) 602-4175 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:FAMILY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappointments to the Advisory Council on Aging BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) along with all applications received for the applicable seat. In all cases, the Board Committee decides which applicants to nominate for full Board action. The Contra Costa Advisory Council on Aging (ACOA) provides a means for county-wide planning, cooperation and coordination for individuals and groups interested in improving and developing services and opportunities for the older residents of this County. The Council provides leadership and advocacy on behalf of older persons and serves as a channel of communication and information on aging. The Advisory Council on Aging consists of 40 members serving 2-year staggered terms, each ending on September 30. The Council consists of representatives of the target population and the general public, including older low-income and military persons; at least one-half of the membership must be made up of actual consumers of services under the Area Plan. The Council includes: 19 representatives recommended from each Local Committee on Aging, 1 representative from the Nutrition Project Council, 1 Retired Senior Volunteer Program, and 19 Members at-Large. Article III, 3.1 of the ACOA Bylaws states that the ACOA may recommend for appointment up to four (4) alternate Member-At-Large (MAL) members, who shall serve and vote in place of members (City or MAL) who are absent from, or who are disqualifying themselves from participating in a meeting of the ACOA. The Area Agency on Aging (AAA), the ACOA and the Clerk of the Board, using Contra Costa TV (CCTV), assisted with recruitment. AAA staff has encouraged interested individuals, including minorities, to apply through announcements provided at the Senior Coalition meetings and at the regular monthly meetings of the ACOA. The Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) website contains dedicated web content where interested members of the public are encouraged to apply. The website provides access to the Board of Supervisors official application with instructions on whom to contact for ACOA related inquiries, including application procedures. At the September 26, 2022 Family and Human Services Committee meeting, the Committee recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the reappointment of the aforementioned members to the ACOA with terms expiring September 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to reappoint members will reduce public participation in advising policy development. ATTACHMENTS D. Card Application redacted K. Donovan Application redacted M. Bruns Application redacted M. Wener Application redacted N. Neemuchwalla Application redacted P. Reed Application redacted S. Shafiabady Application redacted S. Sakai-Miller Application redacted S. Krohn Application redacted S. Lipson Application redacted T. Tobey Application redacted ACOA Roster Advisory Board Seat Title Term Expiration DateCurrent Incumbent Incumbent Supervisor District BoS Appointment Date Advisory Council on Aging Nutrition Project Council 9/30/2022 Vacant Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 1 9/30/2022 Reed, Penny I 12/8/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 2 9/30/2022 Krohn, Shirley IV 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 3 9/30/2023 Butler, Rhoda III 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 4 9/30/2022 Shafiabady, Sara V 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 5 9/30/2022 Card, Deborah V 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 6 9/30/2022 Lipson, Steve I 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 7 9/30/2022 Selleck, Summer IV 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 8 9/30/2022 Leasure, Nancy II 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 9 9/30/2023 Richards, Gerald V 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 10 9/30/2022 Tobey, Terri II 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 11 9/30/2023 Bhambra, Jagjit V 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 12 9/30/2022 Neemuchwalla, Nuru IV 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 13 9/30/2022 Harrington, Dale II 3/22/2022 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 14 9/30/2023 Yee, Dennis IV 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 15 9/30/2022 Bruns, Mary IV 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 16 9/30/2023 O'Toole, Brian IV 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 17 9/30/2022 Donovan, Kevin D.II 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 18 9/30/2022 Wener, Michael II 11/2/2021 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 19 9/30/2023 Kleiner, Jill II 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging At-Large 20 9/30/2022 Sakai-Miller, Sharon II 3/22/2022 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Antioch 9/30/2022 Fernandez, Rudy III 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Brentwood 9/30/2023 Kee, Arthur III 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Clayton 9/30/2023 Berman, Michelle IV 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Concord 9/30/2023 Vacant IV Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Danville 9/30/2023 Donnelly, James II 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee El Cerrito 9/30/2022 Kehoe, Carol I 7/12/2022 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Hercules 9/30/2022 Doran, Jennifer V 10/25/2020 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Lafayette 9/30/2023 Partridge, Erin II 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Martinez 9/30/2023 Iorns, Jody Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Moraga 9/30/2023 Aufhauser, Martin II 6/16/2020 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Oakley 9/30/2023 Rigsby, Michael III 12/14/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Orinda 9/30/2023 Evans, Candace II 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Pinole 9/30/2022 Vacant Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Pittsburg 9/30/2023 Carterelliott, Kacey V 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Pleasant Hill 9/30/2023 Van Ackeren, Lorna IV 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Richmond 9/30/2022 Vacant Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee San Pablo 9/30/2022 Vacant Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee San Ramon 9/30/2023 Bajpai, Swamini II 4/26/2022 Advisory Council on Aging Local Committee Walnut Creek 9/30/2023 Freitag, Eric IV 10/19/2021 Advisory Council on Aging Alternate Member 1 9/30/2023 Awadalla, Mike II 3/22/2022 Advisory Council on Aging Alternate Member 2 9/30/2023 Lee, George V 3/22/2022 Advisory Council on Aging Alternate Member 3 9/30/2023 Raju, Ramapriya III 7/26/2022 Term length: 24 months RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Madhan Gunasekaran to the District 3 seat on the Fish & Wildlife Committee to a term expiring February 28, 2024 as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Fish and Wildlife Committee advises the Board of Supervisors on fish and wildlife issues in Contra Costa County, including use of funds from the Fish & Wildlife Propagation Fund pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 13103. The term for this seat expired February 28, 2022. Applications were accepted and the recommendation to appoint the above individual was then determined. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District 3 seat would be left vacant. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicia Nuchols, 925-655-2335 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINTMENT TO THE FISH & WILDLIFE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the new medical staff, affiliates and tele-radiologist appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, medical staff advancement, and voluntary resignations as recommended by the Medical Staff Executive Committee, at their September 20, 2022 meeting, and by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval for each Medical Staff member be placed in his or her Credentials File. The above recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by the Credentials Committee and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers' medical staff would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Soleimanieh, 925-370-5182 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – September 20, 2022 ATTACHMENTS September List A. New Staff Membership Janatpour, Nina, MD Anesthesia Castillo, Carla, MD DFAM Fujimura, Rebecca, MD Global DFAM Hozic, Amela, DO DFAM Poursartip, Maryam, MD DFAM Singh, Harshjit, MD DFAM Stout, Eric, DO DFAM Dobbins, Emma, MD Hospital Medicine Martinez, Erica, MD OB/GYN Howell, Tiffany, MD Pediatrics Gajendran,Viswanathan, MD Surgery/Urology B. Applications for Vrad C. 6 Month Extension Patel, Rati,MD Diagnostic Imaging D. Staff Advancing to Non-Provisional Ikpatt, Efe, NP DFAM Affiliate Pokharel, Anu, MD DFAM Active Postone, Ariel, MD DFAM Active Rhoades, Chelsea, MD DFAM Active Wu, Eureka, DO DFAM Active Simon, Ari, DO Emergency Active Iqbal, Rashid, Md Internal Med/ Gastro Active Valliani, Salimah, MD Internal Med/Hem/Onc Active Lepp, Nathaniel, MD OB/GYN Active Kashyap, Bhavna, MD Pediatrics Active Campbell, Jorien, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Active Alshehri, Wael, MD Diagnostic Imaging CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND HEALTH CENTERS 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, California 94553-3156 Ph 925-370-5000 A NNA M. ROTH , R.N., M.S., M.P.H. HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR SAMIR B. SHAH , M.D., F.A .C.S. CHIEF EXECUTIVE O FFICER CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL M EDICAL CENTER AND HEALTH CENTERS & CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES E. Biennial Reappointments Tung, Chiu, MD Anesthesia A Brogan, Donna, DDS Dental A Gonzalez, Erik, MD DFAM A Gordon, Amy, MD DFAM A Hamlin, Kathryn, MD DFAM A Laing, Brian, MD DFAM A Lee, Daniel, MD DFAM A Najibi, Skender, MD DFAM P Torres, Marcella, MD DFAM A Yasul, Jose, MD DFAM A Hub bell, Jared, MD Emergency Medicine C Rausa, Katherine, MD Internal Medicine C Sharma, Konark, MD Internal Medicine C Boittin, Nathalie, MD OB/GYN A Millstein, Aram, MD Pathology A Bose, Alok, MD Pediatrics C D'Harlingue , Arthur, MD Pediatrics C Jolton, Francine, MD Pediatrics A Percival, Kara, MD Pediatrics P Ahmed, Safi, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Baldwin, Richard, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C Beltagui, Amr, MD Psychiatry/Psychology P Dumitrescu, Laurentiu, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Elahi, Shan, MD Psychiatry/Psychology P Guss, Jee, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A McQuade, Jennifer, MD Psychiatry/Psychology P Reminajes, Alfeo, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Dosanjh, Amarjit, MD Surgery A F. Biennial Renewal of Privileges Ballesteros, Karla, NP DFAM Kray, Margaret, FNP DFAM Lanzarin, Natalie, NP DFAM Ngadon, Tenzin, NP DFAM Rivera, Iraida, FNP DFAM G. Biennial Reappointments for Teleradiologists (vRad) Morais, Joshua, MD Diagnostic Imaging K. Voluntary Resignations Adler, Frederick, MD DFAM Gee, Lance, MD DFAM Lively, Daniel, MD DFAM Chambers, Cynthia, MD Internal Medicine Sivamani, Raja, MD Internal Medicine Yen, An, MD Internal Medicine Hollins, Viola, MD OB/GYN RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 26052 to increase the hours of one (1) vacant part time 20/40 Clerk-Senior Level (JWXC) (represented) position number 16998 to full time and add one (1) Library Assistant-Journey Level (3KVB) (represented) position in the Library. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost to the Library Fund of approximately $112,141. No fiscal impact to the County general fund. BACKGROUND: The Library has been working on a reallocation of resources to create more efficient staffing at its branch locations. As part of that plan, the Library has increased or modified hours at various locations, including at the San Ramon Library. As a result of this change, the Library has determined that the San Ramon community would be better served with a full-time Library Assistant and full-time Clerk at that location. Following the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Library worked on evaluating its staffing and scheduling plans to best meet the needs of patrons. Following this evaluation, the Library determined that its community libraries should each have at least a Tuesday through Saturday schedule. As part of that determination, the Library has been working to adjust schedules of its vacant positions to align with this new scheduling plan. The Library has determined that the current, recently vacated part-time Clerk-Senior Level position located in San Ramon would better serve the needs of the public if it was a full time position. Additionally, a new Library Assistant-Journey Level position is needed to provide more paraprofessional library services within the branch and to provide needed flexibility in service to the community. Further, recruitment and retention for full time positions are more successful than for part time positions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samuel Treanor at 925-608-7702 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Samuel Treanor, Sylvia WongTam C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:Alison McKee, County Librarian Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Increase one 20/40 Clerk-Senior Level to 40/40 and add one 40/40 Library Assistant-Journey Level position CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this position change is not approved, the Library will have difficulty with recruitment and retention, as well as providing services to the public. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AIR51156_P300 26052 Add LAJ increase Clerk-Senior Level to 4040 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 26052 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 26052 DATE 9/23/2022 Department No./ Department Library Budget Unit No. 0621 Org No. 3782 Agency No. 85 Action Requested: Add 40/40 Library Assistant -Journey Level (3KVB) position. Increase Clerk -Senior Level (JWXC) position 16998 from 20/40 to 40/40 Proposed Effective Date: 10/1/2022 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $112,141.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $74,761.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Library Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Alison McKee ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT /s/ Julie DiMaggio Enea 10/4/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Admini strator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 10/5/2022 Increase one (1) vacant part time 20/40 Clerk -Senior Level (JWXC) (represented) position 16998 to full time and add one (1) Library Assistant -Journey Level (3KVB) (represented) position in the Library. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 10/5/2022 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources /s/ Julie DiMaggio Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT an "Oppose" position on federal Senate Bill S.4295, a bill that would establish a duplicative set of federal financial reporting requirements in addition to those required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. FISCAL IMPACT: The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) estimates that roughly 40,000 state and local government jurisdictions as well as non-profit organizations responsible for reporting annual comprehensive financial reports (ACFRs) nationally would be financially impacted as follows: • At least 15 percent of entities will buy and implement new software at a minimum of $100,000 per entity, • At least 10 percent of entities will need to reconfigure existing systems using outside consultants ranging from $100,000 to $200,000, • At least 25 percent of entities will struggle through updating their systems on their own by utilizing staff capacity at a minimum cost of $50,000, and • The remaining entities, perhaps 50 percent, will develop “shadow systems” and use redundant processes to deal with additional reporting needs that would range from $5,000 to $100,000 depending APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925) 655-2043 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT and OPPOSE Position on Federal Senate Bill S.4295 FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) on the size and complexity of the entity's financial reporting construct. BACKGROUND: According to the National Association of Counties (NACo), in May 2022 Senators. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) introduced the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (S.4295) that would mandate government and non-profit financial information to be reported in a standardized format to ensure there is uniform financial reporting across all types of municipal bond issuing entities. Companion legislation (H.R. 2989), introduced by Representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), passed the U.S. House of Representatives on July 14, 2022, as an amendment to the House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which is annual, "must-pass" legislation. As such, the Senate is actively considering attaching S.4295 to the U.S. Senate version of the FY 2023 NDAA. Section 203 of this legislation would require the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) to develop data standards for financial reporting related to the municipal bond market. These data standards would be required to include common identifiers for information reported, or universal reporting standards, and reporting entities would be required to the extent practicable render fully searchable and machine-readable data with accompanying metadata that clearly define the semantic meaning of the data. MSRB would also be required to “scale” these requirements for smaller regulated entities. If the bill is enacted, MSRB would be required to issue a rule for regulated entities on these new reporting standards within 2 years and the bill would provide another 2 years for implementation. Full implementation and compliance would begin in 2027. Nationally, NACo has acknowledged that counties recognize the need for full disclosure of all relevant information concerning a county’s financial condition to potential investors, citizens, and other parties interested in municipal bonds, however, has historically opposed federally imposed standards for county financial accounting and reporting. This is because the principles developed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) already provide a uniform set of agreed upon standards to develop annual financial reports, which are already required to be disclosed electronically to the MSRB each year. Today's action is being requested by the Board of Supervisors from County Administration staff since the October 2022 Legislation Committee meeting has been canceled, and the U.S. Senate will be in session considering this legislation during the weeks of October 10th and 17th. Staff recommends that the Board take an "Oppose" position on this legislation consistent with the National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, the Government Finance Officer's Association and several other state and local government professional organizations. Attached is a coalition letter from these entities communicating a unified position against the legislation for reference, dated September 29, 2022. ATTACHMENTS Coalition Letter Opposing S.4295, September 2022 Government Finance Officers Association Airports Council International – North America American Hospital Association American Public Gas Association American Public Power Association Association of School Business Officials International Council of Infrastructure Financing Authorities International City/County Management Association National Association of Clean Water Agencies National Association of College and University Business Officers National Association of Counties National Association of Health and Educational Facilities Finance Authorities National Association of Regional Councils National Council of State Housing Agencies National League of Cities National Special Districts Coalition State Debt Management Network The United States Conference of Mayors September 29, 2022 The Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader, U.S. Senate S-221 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Mitch McConnell Minority Leader, U.S. Senate S-230 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Jack Reed Chairman, Senate Armed Services Committee 228 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Jim Inhofe Ranking Member, Senate Armed Services Committee 228 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McConnell, Chairman Reed, and Ranking Member Inhofe: On behalf of the undersigned municipal bond issuer groups, and the tens of thousands of state and local governments and nonprofit entities we represent, we write to express our concerns about S. 4295, the Financial Data Transparency Act (FDTA) and its possible inclusion as an amendment to the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act. To be clear, state and local governments do not oppose transparency and accessibility of information, and in fact, significant financial transparency standards are already in place. Most issuers of municipal securities (e.g., entities represented by the undersigned groups) adhere to governmental reporting standards established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), while others follow standards as determined under state law.1 In whole, issuers of municipal securities exhibit transparency to stakeholders through very established and standardized means. We are concerned about Section 203’s impact on state, county, municipal, public utilities, hospital 1 https://www.accountingfoundation.org/page/PageContent?pageId=/overview-accounting-and- standards/gaap/gaapstateandlocal.html#section_2 and education entities required to submit financial information to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) for several reasons. Among others, a primary concern is that this provision would result in an unfunded mandate on state and local governments due to the increased costs to ensure systems are able to comply with future standards. Further, this provision represents a substantial federal overreach into the content and structure of issuer disclosures, and more broadly the accounting and reporting principles of government entities, contrary to the principles of federalism. Finally, Section 203 could create more confusion and ultimately reduce transparency by forcing vastly different kinds of governmental entities to report using a rigidly standardized schema or taxonomy. Unfunded Mandate This draft legislation imposes an unfunded mandate on issuers of state and local governments that will result in significant costs. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), the nation’s leading entity on governmental financial reporting best practices and training, estimates that of the roughly 40,000-issuer communities currently responsible for reporting annual comprehensive financial reports (ACFRs): • At least 15 percent of governments (and nonprofits) will buy and implement new software at a minimum of $100,000 per government, • At least 10 percent will need to reconfigure existing systems using outside consultants ranging from $100,000 to $200,000, • At least 25 percent will struggle through updating their systems on their own by utilizing staff capacity at a minimum cost of $50,000, and • The remaining governments, perhaps 50 percent, will develop “shadow systems” and use redundant processes to deal with additional reporting needs that would range from $5,000 to $100,000. This means that the costs for all affected public and charitable entities to comply with the mandate would exceed well over $1.5 billion within just two years and a disproportionate burden would likely be placed on smaller entities with the fewest resources. Governments and nonprofit entities that will need to buy and implement new software or to reconfigure existing systems will likely have to hire external professionals and dedicate staff to implement this provision, adding ongoing costs. Federal Overreach and Circumventing the Tower Amendment This bill is an unprecedented and substantial overreach by the federal government. The legislation’s section 203 would direct the MSRB to prescribe data standards on issuers of municipal securities. The MSRB was created by Congress in 1975 under Section 15B of the Exchange Act and enhanced by the Dodd Frank Act in 2010.2 Under Section 15B(d)(1) of the Act, the MSRB and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are prohibited from requiring issuers of municipal securities to make filings at the SEC or MSRB prior to the sale of securities. Further, Section 15B(d)(2) states that “[the MSRB] is not authorized under this title to require any 2 https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2018/34-83885.pdf (pages 8-9) issuer of municipal securities, directly or indirectly through a municipal securities broker, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or otherwise, to furnish to the Board or to a purchaser or a prospective purchaser of such securities any application, report, document, or information with respect to such issuer.” In fact the MSRB’s own The Role and Jurisdiction of the MSRB states that the MSRB is not authorized to regulate municipal entities (page 2).3 Additionally, as both the SEC and MSRB are prohibited from dictating issuer submissions (outside of anti-Fraud provisions) prior to a sale, and the MSRB is prohibited from dictating information following a sale, the FDTA would not conform to existing law. Section 203 could irreparably breach these important guardrails that uphold congressional intent for nearly 50 years, and the tenets of federalism that are deeply rooted in our nation since its founding. When the MSRB was given authority in 2008 to establish and manage the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) repository system for on-going municipal securities disclosures, the SEC approved allowing the MSRB to mandate that documents be sent in PDF format. In fact, under Rule 15c2-12, the MSRB is authorized to set the “electronic format” in which submissions are made. Later, in 2009, the SEC approved an MSRB rule applicable to broker-dealers underwriting new issues of municipal bonds, which also allowed the MSRB to mandate that the underwriter submit the issuer’s offering document to the MSRB in PDF format. However, the FDTA would go much further than dictate how a filing can be loaded into the system, and would instead allow the MSRB to establish “data standards.” The FDTA as drafted could be interpreted to empower the MSRB to impose standards that could dictate both the structure and content of disclosures, and to indirectly prescribe accounting and reporting principles to be used by state and local governments and entities. Municipal Market Analytics, Inc. (MMA), expects that were this bill to become law in its current form, large numbers of municipal issuers will eschew the capital markets altogether for direct bank loans or private placements.4 Under SEC Rule 15c2-12, dealers are generally required when underwriting municipal securities to enter into a Continuing Disclosure Agreement (CDA) with issuers stating that the issuer will provide certain information on an ongoing basis to the MSRB (e.g., annual financial information, material events.) for as long as the bonds are outstanding. However, while identifying certain categories of disclosures to be provided by the issuer under the CDA, Rule 15c2-12 does not specifically dictate the content, amount and manner of presentation of financial and non-financial information that must be provided. That information is determined between the issuer, counsel and others on the deal team, is reflected in the CDA of each issuance and is designed to allow the on-going disclosures to be based on the financial and operating data that is relevant to a particular issuer and financing. That determination is intentional provided the rich diversity in types of governmental and nonprofit issuers in the public market and the financing needs and mechanisms each of them face. The FDTA could be seen as a tool by which the MSRB could undertake to effectively establish the standards for content, amount and manner of presentation of disclosures that the SEC felt it could not do under Rule 15c2- 12. Further, governmental accounting and financial reporting standards, and the data therein, differ greatly from corporate standards. We are unaware of expertise either at the SEC or MSRB, bodies that regulate market functions rather than data standards, to be able to address and well implement a governmental financial reporting data system that would not exacerbate an already tenuous and 3 https://www.msrb.org/msrb1/pdfs/Role-and-Jurisdiction-of-MSRB.pdf (page 2) 4 MMAOutlook091222.pdf (mma-research1.com) expensive endeavor. Significant Financial Transparency Standards are Already in Place Most issuers of municipal securities adhere to governmental reporting standards established by GASB (unless they follow other standards established under state law). There are over 100 GASB statements in place that were vetted through a comprehensive review and public comment process, and any conflicting or differing standards and requirements would be confusing and costly to the entities required to implement, as well as to those who rely on governmental financial information. GASB often takes 5-10 years or more to go from project inception to implementation when developing their statements. Thus, given the very short timeframe in which FDTA provides for rulemaking and full implementation of the standards, along with no requirement to consult national organizations representing public entities (such as those listed above), could certainly result in the creation of standards and requirements that conflict with or differ from current GAAP standards. Additionally, state and local governments and entities issuing municipal securities must adhere to anti-fraud standards under SEC Rule 10b-5 and numerous other state and local sunshine laws that make budget and financial information to be publicly available. Conclusion We would like to reiterate that we support and encourage transparency and accountability in governmental financial reporting. However legislative initiatives like the FDTA’s Section 203 would only hinder efforts already in place, therefore we must oppose the inclusion of this provision in any matters moving forward in Congress. We look forward to hearing from and working with you on this issue. Sincerely, Government Finance Officers Association, Emily Swenson Brock, 202-393-8467 Airports Council International – North America, Amanda La Joie, 202-861-8094 American Hospital Association, Mike Rock, 202-638-1100 American Public Gas Association, Emily Wong, 202-470-4262 American Public Power Association, John Godfrey, 202-467-2929 Association of School Business Officials International, Elleka Yost, 866-682-2729 Council of Infrastructure Financing Authorities, Deirdre Finn, 850-445-9619 International City/County Management Association, Elizabeth Kellar, 202-962-3611 National Association of Clean Water Agencies, Tony Frye, 202-263-9533 National Association of College and University Business Officers, Liz Clark, 202-861-2553 National Association of Counties, Paige Mellerio, 202-942-4272 National Assoc. of Health and Educational Facilities Finance Authorities, Chuck Samuels, 202- 434-7311 National Association of Regional Councils, Leslie Wollack, 202-618-6363 National Council of State Housing Agencies, Garth Rieman, 202-624-7710 National League of Cities, Michael Gleeson, 202-626-3091 National Special Districts Coalition, Cole Karr, 417-861-7418 State Debt Management Network, Rachael Eubanks, Michigan State Treasurer (Chair of SDMN), 202-630-1880 The United States Conference of Mayors, Larry Jones, 202-861-6709 CC: Members of the United States Senate RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a lease with the J. Mortz Limited Partnership for approximately 7,630 square feet of office space at 601 Ferry Street, Martinez for the Public Defender’s Office for a one-year term beginning November 14, 2022, at an annual rent of $100,716. FISCAL IMPACT: Rent and occupancy costs are budgeted within the Public Defender’s Office (100% General Fund). BACKGROUND: The Public Defender’s Office provides necessary and ongoing legal aid to the County population. Rehabilitation of their workspace is vital to improve workflow and support growth within the department. The Public Defender’s existing facility, located at 800 Ferry Street, Martinez, will undergo capital projects to improve the overall conditions at the property. In order to facilitate the rehabilitation efforts at the property, the staff at the Public Defender’s Office will need a temporary facility to conduct business, therefore will be leasing 601 Ferry Street, Martinez for a one-year term. The commencement date of the lease is November 14, 2022. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this lease is not approved, the Public Defender’s Office will not have an adequate space in which to operate, which could cause a disruption in providing legal services to the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessica Castro, 925.957.2461 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:601 Ferry Street Martinez – Lease ATTACHMENTS Lease Agreement RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to apply for and accept American Rescue Plan Act, Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund allocation in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the provision of local government services at the direction of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: $100,000; 100% Federal American Rescue Plan Act, Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund allocation. Funds are distributed by the U.S. Treasury to the County in two, equal allocations of $50,000. The first allocation will be made immediately upon acceptance of the grant award by the County with the second allocation to be made after the start of calendar year 2023. BACKGROUND: According to official guidance released by the U.S. Treasury (Treasury), the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) appropriated $2 billion to Treasury across fiscal years 2022 and 2023 to provide payments to eligible revenue sharing counties and eligible Tribal governments for use on any governmental purpose except for a lobbying activity. Eligible recipients must submit a request for funding to receive their payments, and further instructions can be found on the Treasury website. There is no pre-approval process for projects funded by the program. Recipients must submit periodic reports to Treasury on their expenditures. The purpose of the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925) 655-2043 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:Monica Nino, County Administrator Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize acceptance of Federal Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund allocation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund (LATCF) program is to serve as a general revenue enhancement program. Many eligible revenue sharing counties and eligible Tribal governments have historically experienced fluctuations in their revenues, and this program is designed, in part, to supplement existing federal programs that augment and stabilize revenues for these communities. In providing support to these communities, allocations under this program consider the economic conditions of recipients. Under this program, recipients have broad discretion on uses of funds, similar to the ways in which they may use funds generated from their own local revenue sources. Specifically, recipients may use these funds on any governmental purpose other than a lobbying activity. Recipients may maintain or expand public services – such as health, educational, housing, and public safety services – to their communities with these funds. Recipients may also invest in infrastructure – from roads and bridges to water infrastructure – to facilitate economic development, improve health outcomes, or transition their communities to clean energy. Recipients may also invest in restoring and bolstering government capacity, such as increasing the size of their government workforce or investing in improvements in service delivery, like technology infrastructure and data analysis resources, that will improve delivery of services to their communities for years to come. Based on methodology developed by Treasury, Contra Costa County is eligible for a non-competitive allocation of $100,000 over a two year period for broad use on local government projects (with the exception of lobbying as stated above). The County Administrator's Office plans to seek direction from the Board on how best to allocate these funds at the scheduled November 8, 2022 ARPA quarterly update. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not be able to accept its allocation of Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund allocation. RECOMMENDATION(S): RATIFY the Health Services Department’s grant application; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept grant funding from the United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs for the Community Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative (CVIPI) Grant funds, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 for the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: The total grant application is for $1,500,000 from the Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs for the CVIPI for 3 years. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The goal of this new initiative would be to reduce violent crime in Contra Costa County by providing populations with high risk of violence and in high need of social support with services that are informed by evidence-based practices, social determinants of health, and equity principles as drivers of positive social change. The program intends to serve all of Contra Costa County with a particular emphasis on East and West County. These subregions are disproportionately impacted by violence, poverty and health disparities. Utilizing core evidence-based strategies that promote positive social and physical conditions, enhance community resources, bolster economic opportunities, and advance racial equity in an effort to decrease violence-related injury, death, trauma; improve mental/emotional health; and build strong partnerships with the community. In order to meet the grant application deadline, the Health Services Department submitted this two-part grant application withouth prior Board authorization. Part I was submitted on 6/16/22, Part II on 6/21/22. Therefore, the department is requesting that the Board ratify the application for this grant, as well as authorize the Health Services Director, or designee, to and accept the award. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant #78-014 with the United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to receive the funding from in Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs CVIPI to reduce violence throughout Contra Costa with an emphasis in East and West Contra Costa County and we will continue to see violence in its multiple forms in our communities. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The recommendation supports the following children's outcome: Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Grant Amendment Agreement #28-929-3 with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, to extend the term from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023 with no change in the amount payable to the County of up to $100,000 for the Green and Healthy Homes Program which will monitor retrofit improvements in the homes of high-risk Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members with asthma across Contra Costa County, improving indoor air quality and removing underlying asthma triggers. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this grant amendment agreement will have no fiscal impact as the original amount payable to the County of up to $100,000 will remain. (No County match) BACKGROUND: This grant allows Contra Costa Health Services, and the Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development, with its partner, Marin Clean Energy (MCE), and the Association for Energy Affordability (AEA) to implement the Green and Healthy Homes Program and monitor retrofit improvements in the homes of high-risk CCHP members with asthma across Contra Costa County, improving indoor air quality and removing underlying asthma triggers. This grant agreement will also allow the partners to align project interests and outcomes to Assembly Bill 617 which aims to establish a new community-scale emissions abatement program to reduce the impact of air pollution. On August 11, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Agreement #28-929 to allow the County to receive $100,000 for the implementation of the Green and Healthy Homes Program through December 31, 2021. On October 5, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Amendment #28-929-1 which extended the term of the grant from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 with no change in the amount payable to the County. On March 22, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Amendment #28-929-2 which extended the term of the grant from June 30, 2022 to December 31, 2022 with no change in the amount payable to the County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D., 925-608-5267 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #28–929-3 with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Grant Amendment Agreement #28-929-3 will extend the term of the the Green and Healthy Homes Program through December 31, 2023. The agreement extension is needed due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused delays in services. This agreement includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be able to continue the Green and Healthy Homes Program and CCHP members with asthma will be negatively impacted. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Department, a purchase order with Experian Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $906,060 to renew its subscription to Experian’s Electronic Claims and Remittance Systems Software, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $906,060 over the three-year period between July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025 and will be funded 100% by the Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Services (CCHS) Patient Accounting Department has used Experian Health, Inc. since 2001 for Claims and Remittance Systems Software to simplify claims processing, ensure accurate posting of payments and adjustments, and expedite receipt of payments. CCHS uses the following Experian Health, Inc. modules for accurate posting of payments and adjustments: (1) Electronic Claims Processing, (2) Remittance and Payment Processing, (3) Real-time Transactions Eligibility, and (4) Financial Reporting. This software meets Epic guidelines for Medicare Rules. The services being purchased through this quote are governed by the Master Customer Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between Experian Health, Inc. and Contra Costa County. On September 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved item C.120 to execute a purchase order with Experian Health Inc. in an amount not to exceed $358,475 to renew its subscription to Experian's Electronic Claims and Remittance System Software for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This purchase order will renew previous purchase order 023383. Retroactive Reason: Negotiations with Experian regarding the terms governing the renewal required more than the 60 days the department allotted to complete this renewal. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, (925) 335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Experian Health, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this requested purchase order for renewal will interrupt electronic claims remittance software services resulting in a significant loss of revenue to CCHS. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Loving Campos Associates, Architects, Inc. d/b/a LCA Architects, Inc., effective October 11, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new payment limit of $700,000 for on-call architectural services, with no change to the term November 11, 2019 through November 11, 2023, Countywide. (100% Various Capital Project Funds) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% various capital project funds as projects are awarded. BACKGROUND: On November 11, 2019, the County entered into a three-year contract with Loving Campos Associates, Architects, Inc. d/b/a LCA Architects (LCA) for as-needed architectural services with a payment limit of $195,000. On October 13, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment No. 1 which increased the payment limit by $205,000 to a new payment limit of $400,000 and extended the term through November 11, 2023. On September 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment No. 2 increasing the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $500,000, with no change to the term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeffrey Acuff, 925-957-2487 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 3 to Consulting Services Agreement with Loving Campos Associates, Architects, Inc. d/b/a LCA Architects, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Currently, there is $16,000 remaining on their contract; therefore, Public Works is requesting the Board approve Amendment No. 3 to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new payment limit of $700,000. This will enable LCA to continue providing as-needed architectural services for ongoing and future projects throughout the County. LCA is very familiar with countywide projects for design and construction Therefore, it is recommended that the contract amendment be approved at this time. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If Amendment No. 3 is not approved, projects currently in process will be delayed which will ultimately result in higher project costs. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-731, an Order Form and Statement of Work with Accela, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $962,003 for the Accela Civic Platform for the Hazardous Materials and Environmental Health Divisions to track inspection and enforcement actions for the period October 11, 2022, through November 1, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in annual expenditures of up to $962,003 and will be funded as budgeted by the department in FY 2022-23, by 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Health Services (CCHS) Hazardous Materials and Environmental Health Divisions have been contracting with Accela since May 2016 for its EnvisionConnect application for the provision of specialized software and support services used to track pertinent data on the regulated community and to conduct and track inspection data and enforcement actions. In 2021, Accela informed CCHS of its plans to discontinue the EnvisionConnect application in 2024. As a result, CCHS conducted a full and open request for proposal process by sending requirements to all leading vendors within the market space. Several vendors responded, submitting questions and providing demonstrations of their products. After a review of those options, CCHS decided to migrate from EnvisionConnect to Accela’s Software as a Service (SaaS) subscription-based products, Accela Civic Platform and Environmental Health Civic Application, to continue to fulfill its need for a data management system. Under contract #23-731, Accela will provide services that include configuration and onboarding activities to implement its SaaS based solution. This offering includes Environmental Health Civic Application, Accela Citizen Access Public Portal (ACA), Accela Inspector Mobile Application (AMO), GIS, and Construct API. Functionalities include (but are not limited to) mobile and remote inspection, integrations with third-party systems, payment processing, time accounting, and reporting. Under contract 23-731, the parties will execute a Subscription Services Agreement that obligates the County to indemnify Accela if the software is used in settings that could cause personal injury or death. The contract also APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8777 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Fern Carroll, M Wilhelm C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-731 with Accela, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) limits the contractor’s liability to an amount not to exceed the total amount paid by County in the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding a claim. Approval of contract #23-731 will allow the contractor to onboard its replacement SaaS based solution, providing project management, implementation, development and deployment services through November 1, 2026. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the current application will reach its end of life, and the County will no longer have access to the contractor’s technical expertise and skill concerning its data management system. As a result, the County may experience issues transmitting accurate inspection and compliance data to the California Environmental Reporting System. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner to execute a contract amendment with Arnold R. Josselson M.D., to increase the payment limit by $75,000 to a new payment limit in the amount of $1,175,000 to provide forensic pathology services through the existing term expiration on September 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,175,000 total payment limit; 100% Sheriff general fund. BACKGROUND: Dr. Josselson will assume responsibility for and perform autopsy services for deaths that fall within the jurisdiction of the Coroner, will prepare documents and reports as required, provide training to personnel, provide court testimony as required, and ensure that quality standards are met for the services performed. This will allow the Sheriff-Coroner’s Office to continue to meet the obligations to provide forensic pathology services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If a negative action is given this will result in the Sheriff's Office not having access to a vendor to perform autopsy services and related reporting in the Coroner's Division. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lyn Oco, 925-655-0006 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Forensic Pathology Services - Dr. Arnold Josselson RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new amount of $1,200,000 for the period of August 1, 2021 through August 30, 2022, to provide standard crime scene and biological cleaning services, and specialized cleaning services. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Sheriff Budgeted. The FY 21/22 cost was estimated at approximately $900,000, but the number of actual service callouts surpassed the payment limit. This expense is not currently budgeted, but additional appropriations are not expected to be needed at this time. BACKGROUND: The cleaning of blood and bodily fluids requires extensive training and experience to avoid contamination and health risks. The Sheriff's Office has contracted with Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners since 2019 for full service crime scene and biological cleaning. They have serviced the detention facilities, patrol station houses and vehicles. In addition to the standard APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lyn Oco, 925-655-0006 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) cleaning services, Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners has also provided increased sanitation measures at the Sheriff's facilities. Due to the continued risk of COVID-19, and with the elimination of the County's Emergency COVID Funds, the Sheriff's Office deems it necessary to continue the contract with Diablo Crime Scene Cleaners for the foreseeable future. The Department's needs for services surpassed the original contract payment limit for the August 1, 2021 to August 30, 2022 term. Therefore, additional funds are necessary to pay for the increased expenses. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Sheriff's Office will be unable to acquire the appropriate level of cleaning and sanitation services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a blanket purchase order with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory in an amount not to exceed $360,000 to purchase dental supplies and prosthetics for the Contra Costa County Dental Clinics for the period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $360,000 over the three-year period between September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: Tiernan-Leino Dental Lab manufactures and customizes a variety of dental prosthetics such as crowns and dentures for the County. Tiernan-Leino Dental Lab has customized high-performance dental prosthetics and have a proven track record for quality and innovation for over 70 years. The Contra Costa County Dental Clinics have used Tiernan-Leino Dental Lab for an upwards of 30 plus years, and in that time, they have aided us with high quality dental prosthetics for our dental patients. Tiernan-Leino Dental Lab provides confidence in their products by providing our dentists the dental prosthetics they need to attain high-quality results, and thus providing excellent patient care. On September 11, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.101 to execute a purchase order with Tiernan Leino Dental Lab in the amount of $240,000 for the period of September 1, 2018 through August 31, 2019 to purchase dental supplies and prosthetics. On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.133 to execute an amendment to purchase order #13417 with Tiernan Leino Dental Lab to extend the term from August 31, 2019 through August 31, 2020 with no change in the original payment limit of $240,000 to purchase of dental supplies and prosthetics. The department utilized another vendor for a few years; however, due to the difficulty of a consistent pick-up and delivery system it was been proven to be ineffective. The department also utilizes California Dental Arts for the more complex cases. The department wishes to continue working with Tiernan-Leino Dental Lab since it has been able to provide quality and esthetic dental prostheses. Due to recent changes in APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronny Leffel, 925-550-2299 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) requesting a renewal of an existing purchase order through Contra Costa Regional Medical Center's Materials Management, there was a delay in submitting the necessary documents to request a purchase order renewal. Approval of the requested blanket purchase order will allow this vendor to continue providing a variety of custom dental prosthetics and supplies at Contra Costa County Dental Clinics through August 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa County Dental Clinics will not have the ability to provide good quality dental prosthetics to our patients. This will have a significant negative impact on patient care, putting a significant halt on the delivery of dental prosthetics to many edentulous and partially edentulous patients. As a result, appointments will have to be canceled and dentists will experience many dissatisfied, frustrated patients with the inability to chew or eat properly or smile without feeling self-conscious. Furthermore, the dental clinics would not be able to provide dental prosthetics for these edentulous and partially edentulous dental patients and would need to stop scheduling appointments for these patients. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, (1) a purchase order with QlikTech Inc. in an amount not to exceed $451,881 and (2) an order form with QlikTech Inc. for analytics dashboard subscriptions for the period of September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in expenditures of up to $451,881 over the three-year period between September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The County Health Services Department uses these licenses for the Contra Costa County’s COVID, and internal health quality metrics dashboards. These dashboards have received approximately 11 million views since its implementation. The requested Order Form is governed by an existing agreement from 2016 between QlikTech Inc. and the County. This vendor was competitively procured in 2016, and the department successfully invested the resources and user training needed for the implementation of this software application. The department and users have been satisfied with QlikTech Inc. services, and is therefore requesting to continue with this vendor without having to go out for solicitation. The alternative to continuing the QlikTech Inc. application subscription is more expensive, time-consuming, and user unfriendly. Additionally, switching to another software application would take approximately two years to complete and another year to a year and a half to implement. This request is retroactive due to extensive negotiations between the County and QlikTech on the terms governing the renewal, which took longer than the anticipated 60-day window for completion. Approval of the requested purchase order and order form will allow this vendor to continue providing analytics dashboards for the Health Services Department through August 31, 2025. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Palak Jain, 925-391-1018 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with QlikTech Inc. for Subscription of QSE CPU Core CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without these licenses, the COVID and internal health quality metric dashboards will not function. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute on behalf of the Public Works Director, a purchase order amendment with Crest/Good MFG. Co., Inc., effective October 11, 2022, to increase the payment limit by $201,000 to a new payment limit of $400,000 and extend the term from December 31, 2022 through December 31, 2023, for detention facilities supplies and accessories, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: Facilities Maintenance Budget. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Public Works Facilities Services Division is responsible for maintaining County detention facilities. To do so, Facilities Services purchases facility supplies and accessories (Acorn plumbing products) as needed by the Public Works Department. The Department purchases supplies and accessories according to GSA Multiple Award Schedule #5331800. Facilities Services has exhausted APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ted Lavelle (925) 313-7052 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE a Purchase Order amendment with Crest/Good MFG. Co., Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) almost all of the funds allotted to this purchase order (#021137) and the purchase order will be expiring on December 31, 2022. Facilities Services is requesting an increase of $101,000 to the purchase order limit and a one-year extension to ensure the County has access to the supplies and accessories from this supplier. Government Code Section 23004 authorizes the County to make contracts and purchase and hold personal property necessary to the exercise of its powers. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this purchase order is not approved, the purchase of detention facilities supplies and accessories will discontinue. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, an amendment to blanket purchase order number 022755 with Amazon.com Services, LLC, to increase the payment limit by $2,000,000 to a new payment limit of $2,700,000, with no change to the term July 1, 2021 through June 21, 2024, for access to the online marketplace under the terms of a master contract awarded by Prince William County Public Schools. FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase order amendment will increase the spending limit by $2,000,000 for the remainder of the effective term. Product costs are paid by County Departments. (100% User Departments) BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Purchasing Services is requesting to add funds to an existing blanket purchase order (No. 022755) with Amazon.com Services, LLC, which is used by all County Departments to access Amazon’s online marketplace. The supplies are guaranteed through APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Shehorn, 925-957-2495 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE an amendment to the Blanket Purchase Order with Amazon.com Services, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a master contract awarded by Prince William County Public Schools (PWCS), through the OMNIA Cooperative Program. On June 22, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved a blanket purchase order (BPO) between the County and Amazon.com Services, LLC. Approving this request to increase the payment limit on the existing BPO will allow the County to continue to obtain guaranteed pricing through the term of the Omnia Partner agreement. The BPO approved on 6/22/2021 was the first master contract with Amazon’s online marketplace. Purchasing staff estimated the amount that may be needed based on previous purchasing data. The amount was underestimated due to more departments now using Amazon’s online marketplace to get a variety of products, guaranteed pricing, and next day shipping. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval of the additional funds, County Departments will not have access to Amazon Prime Online Marketplace, which is a resource to all County Departments for miscellaneous products with expedited delivery. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27-824-6 with Arthritis & Rheumatology Medical Associates, Inc. (dba Northern California Arthritis Center), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, to provide rheumatology services to Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $1,500,000 over a three-year period and will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain medical specialty health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor is part of the CCHP Provider Network and has been providing rheumatology since November of 2010. On September 15, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-824-5 with Arthritis & Rheumatology Medical Associates, Inc. (dba Northern California Arthritis Center), in an amount not to exceed $600,000, for the provision of rheumatology services to CCHP members and County recipients, for the period November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #27-824-6 will allow the contractor to continue to provide rheumatology services through October 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain rheumatology specialty health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron A. Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-824-6 with Arthritis & Rheumatology Medical Associates, Inc. (dba Northern California Arthritis Center) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Agiliti Health, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to provide rental equipment at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) for the period of October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase order will result in expenditures of up to $2,000,000 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: Since 2007, the County has contracted with Agiliti Health, Inc. for the rental of medical equipment and devices, such as specialty hospital beds, infusion pumps, and other medical equipment and devices. This vendor provides competitive pricing through the Vizient Group Purchasing contract and has proven more cost effective to rent than to purchase some medical equipment. The Department is requesting to continue receiving this equipment from the contractor for the period of October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2024. On October 19, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.39 to execute a purchase order with Agiliti Health, Inc. in the amount of $1,000,000 for the period of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. On December 7, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved agenda item C.70 to rescind Board Action of October 19, 2021 (C.39) and to execute a purchase order with Agility Health, Inc. in the amount of $750,000 for the period of January 1, 2022 through September 30, 2022 to match the quote term provided for Agiliti Health, Inc. by Vizient. Approval of the requested purchase order will allow this vendor to continue providing rental medical equipment and devices at CCRMC through September 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Department will not have access to this vendor's rental medical equipment and devices, which are necessary to carry out CCRMC medical operations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, (925) 370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Agiliti Health, Inc. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-681-94(7) with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $1,016,244, to provide augmented board and care services for the period from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $1,016,244 and will be funded by 91% ($924,782) Mental Health Realignment and 9% ($91,462) Mental Health Services Act revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County's population by providing augmenting room and board care and providing twenty-four hour emergency residential care and supervision to eligible mentally disordered clients, who are specifically referred by the Mental Health Program staff and who are served by County Mental Health Services. The Health Services Department has been contracting with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), since November 28, 2017 to provide augmented board and care services for mentally ill older adults in Contra Costa County. On November 9, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24-681-94(6) with PH Senior, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor), in the amount of $986,640 for the provision of augmented board and care services for mentally ill older adults, for the period December 1, 2021 through November 30, 2022. Approval of Contract #24-681-94(7) will allow the contractor to continue to provide augmented board and care services through November 30, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be have sufficient coverage to provide augmented board and care services to mentally ill adults in Contra Costa County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Alaina Floyd, marcy.wilham C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-681-94(7) with PH Senior, Care, LLC (dba Pleasant Hill Manor) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Contract #76-662-6 with FirstLocum, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $4,250,000, to provide temporary physician services and recruitment services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period August 1, 2022 through July 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual expenditures of up to $4,250,000 over a two-year period and will be funded as budgeted by 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I allocations. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers have an obligation to provide medical staffing services to patients. Therefore, the County contracts with temporary help firms to ensure patient care is provided during peak loads, temporary absences, vacations and emergency situations where additional staffing is required. The County has been using the contractor’s temporary staffing services since July 1, 2019. On April 26, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-662-4 with FirstLocum, Inc., in the amount of $1,700,000, for the provision of temporary physician staffing services to ensure patient care is provided during peak loads, temporary absences, vacations and emergency situations, and for the provision of recruitment services for the period August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022. The contract process was delayed due to the contractor and the division negotiating rates, as well as, ongoing meet and confer negotiations with Department staff and union representatives. An agreement was reached on September 12, 2022, and the County has met its obligations with the respective labor partner(s). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-662-6 with FirstLocum, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #76-662-6 will allow the contractor to continue providing temporary specialty physicians when additional staffing is required at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers through July 31, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not have access to this contractor’s temporary physician staffing services to cover for County staff during peak loads, temporary absences and emergency situations. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment between ERM-West, Inc., a California corporation (ERM), on the one hand and the County, the Hookston Group, and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), on the other, to extend the term of the contract from January 31, 2023 through June 30, 2023, and increase the payment limit by $75,000 to $285,233, to enable ERM to continue providing remediation and related environmental services at an approximately 8-acre site located at the intersection of Hookston Road and Bancroft Road in Pleasant Hill (the Hookston Site). FISCAL IMPACT: In accordance with an existing settlement agreement between the County, the Hookston Group and UPRR, the costs incurred under the contract with ERM are borne as follows: 50% by UPRR, 25% by the Hookston Group and 25% by the County. The County portion has been designated as an enforceable obligation of the former redevelopment agency and is paid using Successor Agency funds. BACKGROUND: The County, the Hookston Group and UPRR (together, the Hookston Parties) entered into a settlement agreement in 1997 to resolve a civil suit involving allegations of contamination of the soil, subsoil, surface water and groundwater on and emanating from the Hookston Site. The Hookston Site is currently regulated under Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R2-2007-0009, Adoption of Final Site Cleanup Requirements and Recission of Order Nos. R2-2003-0035 and R2-2004-0081, dated January 30, 2007 (the Order). Under a contract between ERM and the Hookston Parties, ERM provides remediation and related environmental services at the Hookston Site. The contract consists of two parts. The first part is a Consultant Services Agreement. The second part consists of separate work authorizations, each reflecting work that is responsive to the Order and approved by the Hookston Parties. The amendment that is the subject of this board order will incorporate a second work authorization, dated September 21, 2022, into the contract. The activities authorized by the second work authorization include work related to the next phase of remediation of the Hookston Site. Through ERM, the Hookston Parties will soon submit to the RWQCB a proposal for the next phase of remediation of the property. The proposal will include a revised feasibility study and a revised design and implementation plan. It is expected that the proposal will result in a new APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Maureen Toms (925) 655-2895 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Consulting Services Agreement with ERM, West, Inc. Hookston BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) order being issued by the RWQCB. As part of its work under the amended contract, ERM will work closely with the RWQCB to ensure that the new order accurately describes the remediation plan being proposed by the Hookston Parties. Once the specific remediation plan is approved and a new RWQCB order is issued, the contract with ERM will need to be amended again to incorporate the work required to carry out the new order and to increase the payment limit accordingly. Further amendment of the contract is estimated to occur in February or March 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If ERM is not allowed to carry out the work described in the second work authorization, the Hookston Parties, including the County, could be deemed by the RWQCB to be out of compliance with the Order. ATTACHMENTS Letter Agreement #2 ERM 1340 Treat Boulevard Suite 550 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: +1 925 946 0455 Fax: +1 926 946 9968 www.erm.com Page 1 © Copyright 2020 by ERM Worldwide Group Limited and/or its affiliates (‘ERM’). All Rights Reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of ERM. 21 September 2022 via Electronic Mail Ms. Mary Lou Helix 1102 Northridge Court Concord, CA 94518 Mr. Scott Selken Union Pacific Railroad Company 1400 Douglas Street STOP 1030 Omaha, NE 68179 Ms. Maureen Toms Contra Costa County C/O Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 Subject: Work Authorization for Additional Required Tasks through January 2023 Hookston Station Site Pleasant Hill, California Dear Ms. Helix, Mr. Selkin, and Ms. Toms: ERM-West, Inc. (ERM) has prepared this Work Authorization for additional environmental services at the Hookston Station site in Pleasant Hill, California (site) through the end of January 2023. ERM’s previous work at this site has been performed on behalf of the Hookston Parties, which consist of Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR); Mary Lou Helix, Karen Hook, Debbie Hook, and Blake Pucell (together the Hookston Group); and Contra Costa County. The site is currently regulated under Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R2-2007-0009, Adoption of Final Site Cleanup Requirements and Rescission of Order Nos. R2-2003-0035 and R2-2004-0081, dated 30 January 2007 (Order). This Work Authorization has been issued under the existing Consulting Services Agreement between ERM and the Hookston Parties, dated 14 December 2021. All tasks in this proposed scope of work are being conducted to satisfy the ongoing requirements of the Order, the Mid-Plume High Resolution Site Characterization Results document, dated 9 July 2021, and comments on the Feasibility Study Addendum/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan, dated 31 March 2021 issued by the RWQCB in an email dated 14 June 2021. This Work Authorization covers all currently known scopes of work to satisfy RWQCB requirements and does not include any additional elements that may be required by the RWQCB in the future. These tasks are estimated to be completed by January 2023. This Work Authorization describes the following tasks to be performed by ERM: ■ Task 1: Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness (5-year Review) ERM 21 September 2022 Page 2 ■ Task 2: Support for Drafting Revised RWQCB Order ■ Task 3: Revised Feasibility Study/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan ■ Task 4: Geotechnical Engineering Assessment ■ Task 5: Project Management The following sections provide a rationale for the proposed work; a brief description of the scope of work; and cost estimate for performing the tasks outlined above. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK A description of work to be performed under each task is provided below. All proposed work is required by the current Order. Task 1 – Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness This task includes budget for preparation of the Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness, which is due every 5 years and will be submitted to the RWQCB on 31 December 2022 in accordance with Task 9 of the Order. The status report will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the remedial activities that have been performed to address TCE contamination associated with the site including: ■ Indoor air quality sampling and operation of VIPSs at homes within the Colony Park neighborhood; ■ In situ chemical oxidation injections into B-Zone groundwater; and ■ Installation of a PRB with zero valent iron to remediate A-Zone groundwater. As outlined in the Order, the Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness will present performance and cost effectiveness data, and evaluate the effectiveness of the remedial program in controlling contaminant migration and protecting human health and the environment. ERM will provide a draft version of the report to the Hookston Parties for review, and comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final submittal to the RWQCB. Task 2 – Support for Drafting Revised RWQCB Order The RWQCB has informed the ERM and the Hookston Parties that they are preparing a revised Order to replace Order No. R2-2007-0009 that will include directives to execute an approved alternative cleanup plan, and they have requested support from ERM and the Hookston Parties in drafting the new Order. The scope of this task includes: ■ Updating sections of the Order as requested by the RWQCB, which may be limited to providing accurate historical site information, but could include assistance with drafting other sections as requested by the RWQCB ■ Support on developing a new Fact Sheet to support public comment on the new Order ■ Communication with the RWQCB regarding the Order ERM will provide the Hookston Parties with a draft version of text to be added to all Water Board correspondence for review, and comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final submittal to the RWQCB. ERM 21 September 2022 Page 3 Task 3 – Revised Feasibility Study/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan During a meeting with the RWQCB on 28 July 2022, RWQCB provided comments to the Revised Feasibility Study Addendum/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan (Revised FS/RDIP). These comments included requests to: ■ Provide supporting statements regarding the historical effectiveness of the vapor intrusion mitigation systems installed to support Remedial Action Objective (RAO) #3 ■ Provide additional clarification in the document as to the difference between the performance monitoring period of 10 to 30 years referenced in Section 4.0 and the groundwater remediation timeline analysis presented in Section 6.0 of the Revised FS/RDIP ■ Revaluate if a more aggressive alternate cleanup plan could be considered to shorten the groundwater remediation timeline analysis presented in Section 6.0 of the Revised FS/RDIP ■ Propose the installation of the groundwater monitoring well closer to the A-Zone source area injection points that will allow for a more timely evaluation of remedial effectiveness ■ Provide a feasibility evaluation of source area soil treatment options and an inclusion of a recommended source area cleanup plan in the Revised FS/RDIP ERM will prepare an update to the Revised Feasibility Study Addendum/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan to address the RWQCB comments presented above. This scope of this document includes the following elements: ■ Completing the source area soil feasibility study (including conceptual design and cost estimation) and developing a recommended source area soil remedial plan ■ Updating estimated timeframes for the effects of the additional groundwater treatment to reach downgradient monitoring wells, based on proposed revisions to the groundwater treatment plan to meet RWQCB expectations for a more aggressive treatment option ■ Redefining the performance monitoring program The Revised Feasibility Study Addendum/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan is a conceptual remedial design plan that will be submitted to the RWQCB for approval of the proposed approach. A separate and more detailed remedial design and specifications package that will be used to solicit bids from potential subcontractors will be prepared following RWQCB approval of the conceptual remedial plan, therefore is not included in this scope of work. ERM will provide a draft version of the revised document to the Hookston Parties for review, and comments/ revisions will be incorporated into the final submittal to the RWQCB. Task 4 – Geotechnical Engineering Assessment Source area soil impacts are present beneath the warehouse at the site. The excavation will need to be performed in a manner that is protective of the structural stability of the existing warehouse building at the site. ERM will engage with a geotechnical engineering subcontractor to evaluate the excavation approaches and shoring options. The evaluation will include: ERM 21 September 2022 Page 4 ■ A review of available historical documentation regarding the composition of the subsurface soil (boring logs, CPT logs, etc.) ■ A review of available historical documentation on building construction (to be provided by the Hookston Parties, the City of Pleasant Hill, or Contra Costa County) ■ Perform a site walk to inspect the current building condition ■ Prepare a memorandum that presents a conceptual shoring approach along with any recommendations for soil sampling or geotechnical testing necessary to support a final design This evaluation will be used to prepare the remedial design and specifications package for the source area remedy implementation. Task 5 – Project Management This task will cover the management activities associated with the tasks to complete activities as presented in Task s 1, 2, 3, and 4. These activities include cost tracking; calls, meetings, and strategic support from ERM for regulatory agency interactions; and routine communications with the Hookston Parties through 31 January 2023. SCHEDULE ERM is prepared to start the scope of work outlines above immediately upon approval of this Work Authorization by the Hookston Parties. ESTIMATED PROBABLE COST The estimated probable cost to perform the proposed scope of work is $72,441, as summarized in the tables included as Appendix A. This budget is being proposed on a time-and-materials basis of hourly charges for ERM personnel, plus direct expenses. Only those costs incurred will be charged, and will not exceed the estimated cost without prior approval by the Hookston Parties. The estimated cost is an estimated maximum, which we fully expect will cover the services described herein, but no guarantee is made or implied. A cost summary by task is provided in the table below. Task Description Total 1 Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness $23,468 2 Support for Drafting Revised RWQCB Order $12,187 3 Update to Feasibility Study/Remedial Design and Implementation Plan $11,9448 4 Civil/GeoTech/Structural Engineering Assessment $14,931 5 Project Management $9,911 Estimated Probable Cost $72,441 ERM 21 September 2022 Page 5 TERMS AND CONDITIONS ERM proposes to perform this scope of work in accordance with the Consulting Services Agreement between the Hookston Parties and ERM dated 14 December 2021 (“Contract”; attached by reference). ORDER OF PRECEDENCE This Work Authorization, attachments, and exhibits hereto, including the Contract’s terms and conditions and all referenced documents, constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters herein, and integrate, merge, and supersede all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements relating thereto, whether written or oral, except to the extent they are expressly incorporated herein. The provisions of this agreement and the accompanying documents shall be construed and interpreted consistently. Unless otherwise stated elsewhere in this submittal, any conflicts in this submittal and the accompanying documents shall be resolved in accordance with the following in descending order of precedence: (a) The fully executed Work Authorization referencing the terms and conditions of the Consulting Services Agreement between the Hookston Parties and ERM dated 14 December 2021 and any fully executed amendments. (b) Any subsequent purchase orders/work authorizations issued. ERM 21 September 2022 Page 6 AUTHORIZATION If this Work Authorization is acceptable, please have an authorized representative sign in the space provided below and return a copy to ERM for our files. The above-referenced offer is valid for 90 days. ERM-West, Inc. Client Approval UPRR Representative Signature Signature Brian Bjorklund Printed Name Printed Name Partner Title Title Date Date Contra Costa County Representative Signature Printed Name Title Date Helix Trust Representative Signature Printed Name Title Date Scott Selken Sr. Mgr. Site Remediation 9/22/2022 APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE TABLE Cost Estimate for Tasks through Calendar Year 2022 Hookston Station Site, Pleasant Hill, CA ERM-West, Inc. SCOPE OF WORK GRAND TOTALS AMOUNT Total Agreement Dollars 72,441$ Total Labor Dollars 61,416$ DOLLAR Total Labor Hours 479 YEAR AMOUNT 2022 72,441$ SERVICE ITEM AMOUNT WP/Sec 2,267$ Staff Associate 4,319$ CAD Operator 3,671$ TASK AMOUNT LABOR SUBS + ODCs Project Associate 12,373$ Task 1 - Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness 23,468$ 22,768$ 700$ Project Manager 11,711$ Task 2 - Support for Drafting Revised RWQCB Order 12,187$ 12,187$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 14,160$ Task 3 - Revised FSRDIP 11,944$ 11,594$ 350$ Program Director 4,817$ Task 4 - Engineering Assessment 14,931$ 4,956$ 9,975$ Principal 8,098$ Task 5 - Regulatory Management 2022 9,911$ 9,911$ -$ TOTAL 61,416$ Reimbursables 1,050$ Materials -$ Markup on Materials -$ Totals 72,441$ 61,416$ 11,025$ Subcontractors 9,500$ Markup on Subs 475$ TOTAL 11,025$ TOTAL AMOUNT PER TASK PROPOSAL SUMMARY Distribute total agreement amount to the year when work will occur SERVICE ITEM TOTALS The following activities to be conducted during Third Quarter 2022 and through the First Quarter 2023 are included in this proposal: 1) Status Report on Remedy Effectiveness 2) Support for Drafting Revised RWCQCB Order 3) Revised FS/RDIP Update 4) Engieering Assessment 5) Regulatory Management ERM Page 1 of 6 HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 SUMMARYTotal for Job Number 23,468$ Task 1 - Status Report on Remedy EffectivenessTotal Labor 22,768$ Total Hours 176.0Budget AssumptionsPROPOSALS Sub Task 1 Project Management Sub Task Sub Task Sub Task 1 - Project ManagementCategory Totals Location Location Location Category Hours AssumptionsSI Number - Description Rate Quantity ($) Quantity ($) ($) Quantity ($)WP/Sec 58.13$ 12.0 12.0 698$ -$ -$ WP/Sec 12.0 report copiesStaff Associate 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateCAD Operator 107.97$ 24.0 24.0 2,591$ -$ -$ CAD Operator 24.0 figuresProject Associate 113.51$ 36.0 36.0 4,086$ -$ -$ Project Associate 36.0 data tabulation, QA/QCProject Manager 130.12$ 50.0 50.0 6,506$ -$ -$ Project Manager 50.0 data analysis, data management, reporting, editsSr. Project Manager 152.26$ 30.0 30.0 4,568$ -$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 30.0 review and technical editsProgram Director 166.12$ - - -$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipal 179.95$ 24.0 24.0 4,319$ -$ -$ Principal 24.0 report review, discussions with clientsSub Task - Category Hours AssumptionsReimbursables Actual - 700$ Materials Actual - -$ WP/SecMarkup on Materials 5% - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateSubcontractors Actual - -$ CAD OperatorMarkup on Subs 5% - -$ Project AssociateMileage$0.580- - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerPer Diem$125.00- - -$ -$ -$ Sr. Project ManagerGrand Totals23,468$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipalREIMBURSABLE DETAILS MATERIAL DETAILS SUBCONTRACTOR DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT REIMBURSABLE DETAILSCAD - Recovery Computer 1 600$ ITEM SUB TASK AssumptionShipping - Reports 1 100$ CAD - Recovery Compute1 $25/CADD Operator HourShipping- Reports 1 $100 per DocumentMATERIAL DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AssumptionReimbursable Total (Check Cell E22) 700$ Materials Total (Check Cell E23) -$ Subcontractor Total (Check Cell E25) -$ -$ -$ 23,468$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - 4,319$ - 700$ 4,086$ - 6,506$ - 4,568$ - 2,591$ - Quantity698$ - -$ - ERMPage 2 of 6HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 SUMMARYTotal for Job Number 12,187$ Task 2 - Support for Drafting Revised RWQCB OrderTotal Labor 12,187$ Total Hours 98.0Budget AssumptionsPROPOSALS Sub Task 1 Project Management Sub Task Sub Task Sub Task 1 - Project ManagementCategory Totals Location Location Location Category Hours AssumptionsSI Number - Description Rate Quantity ($) Quantity ($) ($) Quantity ($)WP/Sec 58.13$ 12.0 12.0 698$ -$ -$ WP/Sec 12.0 Editorial reviewStaff Associate 107.97$ 24.0 24.0 2,591$ -$ -$ Staff Associate 24.0 Historical review and drafting OrderCAD Operator 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ CAD OperatorProject Associate 113.51$ 24.0 24.0 2,724$ -$ -$ Project Associate 24.0 Historical review and drafting OrderProject Manager 130.12$ - - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerSr. Project Manager 152.26$ 18.0 18.0 2,741$ -$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 18.0 Draft Order review, editsProgram Director 166.12$ 12.0 12.0 1,993$ -$ -$ Program Director 12.0 Document reviewPrincipal 179.95$ 8.0 8.0 1,440$ -$ -$ Principal 8.0 Document reviewSub Task - Category Hours AssumptionsReimbursables Actual - -$ Materials Actual - -$ WP/SecMarkup on Materials 5% - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateSubcontractors Actual - -$ CAD OperatorMarkup on Subs 5% - -$ Project AssociateMileage$0.580- - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerPer Diem$125.00- - -$ -$ -$ Sr. Project ManagerGrand Totals12,187$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipalREIMBURSABLE DETAILS MATERIAL DETAILS SUBCONTRACTOR DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT REIMBURSABLE DETAILSCAD - Recovery Computer 1 -$ ITEM SUB TASK AssumptionCAD - Recovery Compute1 $25/CADD Operator HourMATERIAL DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AssumptionReimbursable Total (Check Cell E22) -$ Materials Total (Check Cell E23) -$ Subcontractor Total (Check Cell E25) -$ -$ -$ 12,187$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,993$ - 1,440$ - -$ 2,724$ - -$ - 2,741$ - -$ - Quantity698$ - 2,591$ - ERMPage 3 of 6HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 SUMMARYTotal for Job Number 11,944$ Task 3 - Revised FSRDIPTotal Labor 11,594$ Total Hours 90.0Budget AssumptionsPROPOSALS Sub Task 1 Project Management Sub Task Sub Task Sub Task 1 - Project ManagementCategory Totals Location Location Location Category Hours AssumptionsSI Number - Description Rate Quantity ($) Quantity ($) ($) Quantity ($)WP/Sec 58.13$ 6.0 6.0 349$ -$ -$ WP/Sec 6.0 Report copy generation, editorial reviewStaff Associate 107.97$ 16.0 16.0 1,728$ -$ -$ Staff Associate 16.0 Addressing Water Board comments, reportingCAD Operator 107.97$ 10.0 10.0 1,080$ -$ -$ CAD Operator 10.0 FiguresProject Associate 113.51$ 18.0 18.0 2,043$ -$ -$ Project Associate 18.0 Addressing Water Board comments, reportingProject Manager 130.12$ - - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerSr. Project Manager 152.26$ 24.0 24.0 3,654$ -$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 24.0 Reporting, Document Review, EditsProgram Director 166.12$ 10.0 10.0 1,661$ -$ -$ Program Director 10.0 Document reviewPrincipal 179.95$ 6.0 6.0 1,080$ -$ -$ Principal 6.0 Document reviewSub Task - Category Hours AssumptionsReimbursables Actual - 350$ Materials Actual - -$ WP/SecMarkup on Materials 5% - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateSubcontractors Actual - -$ CAD OperatorMarkup on Subs 5% - -$ Project AssociateMileage$0.580- - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerPer Diem$125.00- - -$ -$ -$ Sr. Project ManagerGrand Totals11,944$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipalREIMBURSABLE DETAILS MATERIAL DETAILS SUBCONTRACTOR DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT REIMBURSABLE DETAILSCAD - Recovery Computer 1 250$ ITEM SUB TASK AssumptionShipping - Reports 1 100$ CAD - Recovery Compute1 $25/CADD Operator HourShipping- Reports 1 $100 per DocumentMATERIAL DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AssumptionReimbursable Total (Check Cell E22) 350$ Materials Total (Check Cell E23) -$ Subcontractor Total (Check Cell E25) -$ -$ -$ 11,944$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,661$ - 1,080$ - 350$ 2,043$ - -$ - 3,654$ - 1,080$ - Quantity349$ - 1,728$ - ERMPage 4 of 6HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 SUMMARYTotal for Job Number 14,931$ Task 4 - Engineering AssessmentTotal Labor 4,956$ Total Hours 40.0Budget AssumptionsPROPOSALS Sub Task 1 Project Management Sub Task Sub Task Sub Task 1 - Project ManagementCategory Totals Location Location Location Category Hours AssumptionsSI Number - Description Rate Quantity ($) Quantity ($) ($) Quantity ($)WP/Sec 58.13$ 4.0 4.0 233$ -$ -$ WP/Sec 4.0 Staff Associate 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ Staff Associate - CAD Operator 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ CAD Operator - Project Associate 113.51$ 16.0 16.0 1,816$ -$ -$ Project Associate 16.0 Project Manager 130.12$ 10.0 10.0 1,301$ -$ -$ Project Manager 10.0 Sr. Project Manager 152.26$ 6.0 6.0 914$ -$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 6.0 Program Director 166.12$ 2.0 2.0 332$ -$ -$ Program Director 2.0 Principal 179.95$ 2.0 2.0 360$ -$ -$ Principal 2.0 Sub Task - Category Hours AssumptionsReimbursables Actual - -$ Materials Actual - -$ WP/SecMarkup on Materials 5% - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateSubcontractors Actual - 9,500$ CAD OperatorMarkup on Subs 5% - 475$ Project AssociateMileage$0.580- - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerPer Diem$125.00- - -$ -$ -$ Sr. Project ManagerGrand Totals14,931$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipalREIMBURSABLE DETAILS MATERIAL DETAILS SUBCONTRACTOR DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT REIMBURSABLE DETAILSCAD - Recovery Computer 1 -$ GeoTech/Structural Eng 1 9,500$ ITEM SUB TASK AssumptionCAD - Recovery Compute1 $25/CADD Operator HourMATERIAL DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AssumptionReimbursable Total (Check Cell E22) -$ Materials Total (Check Cell E23) -$ Subcontractor Total (Check Cell E25) 9,500$ -$ -$ 14,931$ -$ 9,500$ 475$ -$ 332$ - 360$ - -$ 1,816$ - 1,301$ - 914$ - -$ - Quantity233$ - -$ - ERMPage 5 of 6HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 SUMMARYTotal for Job Number 9,911$ Task 5 - Regulatory Management 2022Total Labor 9,911$ Total Hours 75.0Budget AssumptionsPROPOSALS Sub Task 1 Project Management Sub Task Sub Task Sub Task 1 - Project ManagementCategory Totals Location Location Location Category Hours AssumptionsSI Number - Description Rate Quantity ($) Quantity ($) ($) Quantity ($)WP/Sec 58.13$ 5.0 5.0 291$ -$ -$ WP/Sec 5.0 1 hr per month for document filing, etc.Staff Associate 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ Staff Associate - CAD Operator 107.97$ - - -$ -$ -$ CAD Operator - Project Associate 113.51$ 15.0 15.0 1,703$ -$ -$ Project Associate 15.0 3 hr per month for data review for RP communicationProject Manager 130.12$ 30.0 30.0 3,904$ -$ -$ Project Manager 30.0 6 hrs per month for RP and Agency communications; budget managemSr. Project Manager 152.26$ 15.0 15.0 2,284$ -$ -$ Sr. Project Manager 15.0 3 hr per month for RP and Agency communicationsProgram Director 166.12$ 5.0 5.0 831$ -$ -$ Program Director 5.0 1 hr per month for document filing, etc.Principal 179.95$ 5.0 5.0 900$ -$ -$ Principal 5.0 1 hr per month for document filing, etc.Sub Task - Category Hours AssumptionsReimbursables Actual - -$ Materials Actual - -$ WP/SecMarkup on Materials 5% - -$ -$ -$ Staff AssociateSubcontractors Actual - -$ CAD OperatorMarkup on Subs 5% - -$ Project AssociateMileage$0.580- - -$ -$ -$ Project ManagerPer Diem$125.00- - -$ -$ -$ Sr. Project ManagerGrand Totals9,911$ -$ -$ Program DirectorPrincipalREIMBURSABLE DETAILS MATERIAL DETAILS SUBCONTRACTOR DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT ITEM SUB TASK AMOUNT REIMBURSABLE DETAILSCAD - Recovery Computer 1 -$ ITEM SUB TASK AssumptionCAD - Recovery Compute1 $25/CADD Operator HourMATERIAL DETAILSITEM SUB TASK AssumptionReimbursable Total (Check Cell E22) -$ Materials Total (Check Cell E23) -$ Subcontractor Total (Check Cell E25) -$ -$ - Quantity291$ - -$ - 1,703$ - 3,904$ - 2,284$ - -$ 831$ - 900$ - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,911$ ERMPage 6 of 6HOOKSTON/0113680 - 1/3/2019 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Human Resources. or designee, to execute a contract with Biometrics4ALL, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $495,000 to provide Live Scan fingerprinting technology services, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025, with the option for two one-year extensions. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this contract is borne by the hiring departments that utilize the services (100% User Departments). BACKGROUND: In 2020, the County approved a contract with Biometrics4ALL, Inc. to provide a technology service platform via ApplicantServices.com that facilitates and streamlines social distancing fingerprinting services to new hire candidates and provides an expanded network of available locations. The platform allows candidates to directly schedule appointments at various locations throughout the State of California. Biometrics4All, Inc. collects and retains all completed live scan applications on behalf of the County per the Department of Justice (DOJ) legal requirements for a period of one (1) year. The service provided by Biometrics4ALL, Inc. not only takes the health and safety of the candidates and County staff into consideration, but it also brings efficiency and convenience to applicants requiring fingerprinting services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Margaret Tolbert, 925-665-2163 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ann Elliott, Human Resources Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Biometrics4ALL, Inc. Live Scan Fingerprinting Contract CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will be unable to offer fingerprinting and related services offered by Biometrics4ALL, Inc. for new hire candidates. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #74-513-9 with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $3,702,962 to provide mental health services to adults diagnosed with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023, in an amount not to exceed $1,851,481. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in annual budgeted expenditures of up to $3,702,962 and will be funded approximately by 43% Federal Medi-Cal ($1,599,874), 43% Mental Health Realignment ($1,599,874) and 14% Mental Health Realignment for non-medical ($503,214) revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing Mental Health Services Act Community Services and Support Program, including outpatient mental health services, case management, crisis intervention, and other mental health services to eligible adult clients in Contra Costa County. The County has been contracting with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center since March 2016. On December 14, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-513-8 with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center, in an amount not to exceed $3,595,109 for the provision of mental health services to SPMI adults for the period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,797,554. Approval of Novation Contract #74-513-9 will replace the automatic extension under the prior contract and allow the contractor to continue providing mental health services through June 30, 2023. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-513-9 with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County’s clients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness will not receive specialty mental health services from this contractor including case management and crisis intervention. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Director, up to 1,500 Target gift cards each with a $20 value totaling an amount of up to $30,000 to incentivize several patient populations to obtain services including, parents having their children immunized and adults completing cancer screenings to support reducing health disparities and encouraging parents to bring their children in for well-child visits, as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: This requested $30,000 expenditure for incentives is a cost effective approach to support CCRMC's efforts to meet its Quality Incentive Pool (QIP) Medi-Cal funding targets for certain measures and secure continuation of $100 million funding for Medi-Cal patient services. The incentive gift cards will be entirely funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: It is important for children and adolescents to see their primary care provider for regular well child visits and to receive their full complement of immunizations as recommended by pediatricians, the California Department of Public Health, and the Centers for Disease Control. For both measures, the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers are experiencing care rates of less than 50%, but it is not uncommon for a child to need only one vaccination to complete the full complement of immunizations or one visit to remain current for a child’s care. CCRMC adult patients need regular self-care reminders for colon, breast, and cervical cancer screening. Yearly birthday letters are sent as reminders for these services, but it is particularly difficult to convince patients to schedule timely colon and cervical cancer screenings. CCRMC is finding that patients still need encouragement to address these types of patient care and the use of gift cards would be an added incentive for patients and parents of children and adolescents to address these issues. The Quality Incentive Pool Program (QIP) eligibility criteria is that patients qualify for Medi-Cal, are contacted for one of the three service types, and complete the service type described. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, (925) 370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase of Gift Cards for Child Immunization, Well-Child Visit and Cancer Screening Incentives CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the purchase of gift cards for important preventative care services are not approved, CCRMC may not be able to meet its QIP Medi-Cal funding targets for certain measures, which could impact the health and well-being of vulnerable adults and children and result in the loss of $100 million for 2022. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This recommendation supports the following Board of Supervisor's community outcome: Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. One of our goals for well-child visits is to reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes. High-quality well-child visits can improve children's health, caregivers' behaviors to promote their children's health, and prevent injury and harm. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #74-315-24 with EMBRACE, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,925,048, to provide Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS) and outpatient mental health services to Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED) children and youth, and their families, for the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2023 in an amount not to exceed $962,524. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in budgeted expenditures of up to $1,925,048 and will be funded by 50% Federal Medi-Cal ($962,524), 45% Mental Health Realignment ($866,272), and 5% Measure X ($96,252) revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: The contract meets the social needs of the County by providing TBS to SED children who have been discharged from a hospital or have failed in other placements. This contractor shall also provide a Multisystemic Behavioral and Functional Family Therapy program for adolescents who are discharged from Juvenile Hall and the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility. The County has been contracting with EMBRACE since December 2007. On December 14, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74–315–22 with EMBRACE, in an amount not to exceed $1,550,044, to provide TBS, Multisystemic Behavioral Therapy and Counseling Enriched Classroom (CEC) school-based services, for the period from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $775,022. On February 1, 2022, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment Agreement #74-315-23, effective January 1, 2022, to increase the per minute billing rates for the contract and automatic extension due to COVID-19 with no change in the original payment limit and original term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-315-24 with EMBRACE BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Novation Contract #74–315–24 will replace the automatic extension under the prior contract and allow the contractor to continue providing services, through June 30, 2023. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, SED children and youth involved in the juvenile justice system will not have access to this contractor’s mental health services which may result in a reduction of services and placement in higher levels of care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This TBS program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement with the Regents of the University of California, in an amount not to exceed $114,000, for Master Gardener Program services, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for the contract are budgeted in the Agriculture Department's General Fund allocation. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Under the general direction of the Agricultural Commissioner, the contractor shall coordinate the Master Gardener Program. Local community volunteer residents trained by the University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources will extend research-based horticulture to the state's home gardeners, including managing the program budget and volunteer training, and providing oversight of public outreach efforts within the County. This agreement has a mutual indemnification provision which provides that each party will defend and indemnify the other for injuries or losses arising out of the performance of the agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this request will result in the loss of efficiencies in the Master Gardener Program in Contra Costa County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matt - 8-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren, Ag Commissioner/Weights & Measures Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:UC Cooperative Extension Master Gardener Program Coordinator Agreement RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Participation Agreement #74-642-1 with California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA), a government agency, in an amount not to exceed $78,000 to act as the fiscal and administrative agent and provide support and technical assistance for the Statewide Prevention Early Intervention Program for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $78,000 and will be funded 100% by Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). BACKGROUND: The purpose of this participation agreement is to grant CalMHSA the authority to act as the fiscal and administrative agent on behalf of the County for the Statewide PEI Program. In partnership with participating members, this program will disseminate and direct Statewide PEI project campaigns, programs, resources, and materials; provide subject matter in suicide prevention and stigma and discrimination reduction (SDR) to support local PEI efforts; develop local and statewide capacity building support and new outreach materials for counties, and community stakeholders. The primary focus of these programs is to promote mental health and wellness, suicide prevention, and health equity to reduce the likelihood of mental illness, substance use, and suicide among Californians, particularly among diverse and underserved communities. Under Contract #74-642-1, the contractor will act as the fiscal and administrative agent for the Statewide PEI Program to manage funds received consistent with the requirements of any applicable laws, regulations, guidelines and/or contractual obligations, and contract with subject matter experts to support the goals and efforts of the Statewide PEI Program, in an amount not to exceed $78,000, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. This contract includes the County’s agreement to defend and indemnify contractor. Since 2017, CalMHSA participation agreement payments had been arranged through an Annual Commitment APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5169 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Participation Agreement #74-642-1 with California Mental Health Services Authority BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Funding Form and were processed on a purchase order. This year, CalMHSA changed its approach to a participation agreement. This request is retroactive due to the time needed to establish the participation agreement and go through the approval processes. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this participation agreement is not approved, Contra Costa County will not have access to this contractor’s services, which allow the County’s participation in the Statewide PEI Program. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of County Contract #76-625-4 with Adam Warren, M.D., Inc., A Professional Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $297,000, to provide orthopedic and surgical services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period November 1, 2022 through October 31, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $297,000 over a 3-year period and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community, CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers rely on contracts to provide necessary specialty health services to their patients. This contractor’s orthopedic and surgical services will include clinic coverage, on-call services, medical and surgical procedures. The County has been contracting with Adam Warren, M.D., Inc., A Professional Corporation, since November 2018 to provide orthopedic and surgical services. In November 2021, the County Administrator approved and Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #76-625-3 with Adam Warren, M.D., Inc., A Professional Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $99,000, to provide orthopedic and surgical services for CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers patients for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2022. Approval of Contract #76-625-4 will allow the contractor to continue providing orthopedic and surgical services through October 31, 2025. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the necessary specialty orthopedic and surgical services needed for patient care will not be available or will create increased wait times due to the limited number of specialty providers available within the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-625-4 with Adam Warren, M.D., Inc., A Professional Corporation RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Cancelation Agreement #77-382-1 with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., a sole proprietor, effective at the close of business on October 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract was funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor has been part of the CCHP Provider Network providing ophthalmology services to CCHP members and County recipients since August 1, 2021. On June 22, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-382 with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $300,000, for the provision of ophthalmology services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients, for the period August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2024. In accordance with General Conditions Paragraph 5 (Termination), of the contract, the department and contractor have agreed to a mutual cancelation of this contract. Approval of Cancelation Agreement #77-382-1 will accomplish this termination, effective at the close of business on October 31, 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharon Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Cancellation Agreement #77-382-1 with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) to extend the term through April 1, 2025, with no change to the payment limit of $505,336 from the Livable Communities Trust (District I portion) for the Heritage Point Commercial Project in North Richmond, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. BACKGROUND: On September 22, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved allocating $505,336 from the Livable Community Trust (District 1 portion) to help build out ground floor commercial space at Heritage Point Apartments, an affordable housing development in North Richmond. The grocery store site is next to the apartments on the corner lot of Chesley Ave and Fred Jackson Way. The goal is to build a high quality, affordable, and walkable neighborhood grocery in the heart of North Richmond that will improve the quality of life of residents. The neighborhood grocery store will cater to North Richmond residents and workers. The store will provide fresh local affordable produce, limited bakery/milk case merchandise, and household products. The residential portion of Heritage Point located in North Richmond completed construction and occupied in 2020 with 42 units of new affordable rental units. The County loaned approx. $6.3 million of the combination of Housing Successor Low Moderate Income Housing Funds and Community Development Block Grant Funds to CHDC. In addition, $927,494 in Livable Communities Trust funds was provided as grant to CHDC for the development of the apartments. As recommended by Supervisor Gioia, the term of the contract will be amended to extend the termination date from April 1, 2023 to April 1, 2025, with the expectation that CHDC will demonstrate that sufficient financing/funding sources have been secured to complete the project by October 1, 2023, and construction must start by April 1, 2024. CHDC will have one year to complete construction with a termination date on the contract of April 1, 2025. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristin Sherk 925-655-2889 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Livable Communities Trust Contract Amendment with Community Housing Development Corporation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Heritage Point Commercial continues to support Smart Growth goal number four: To promote economic revitalization and urban infill communities. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller or designee, to pay an amount not to exceed $40,626 to Medline Industries, Inc. for Annual Inventory Services provided during the period of June 22, 2022, through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action will result in a one-time expenditure of $40,626 and will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The main distributor of medical products for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers was Professional Hospital Supply (PHS) for many years. PHS was purchased by Medline Industries, Inc. in 2014. CCRMC has been utilizing Medline to provide annual inventory assistance for the past several years. Medline is also CCRMC's contracted vendor for medical-surgical supply distribution and end to end distribution, as an awarded Vizient Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) supplier. Approximately 95% of all inventory purchases are distributed through Medline. Their knowledge and experience with our inventory transactions have been instrumental during inventory preparation and performance of the physical counts. Without the assistance of an outside professional inventory company, completing the physical inventory would have been a challenge for Materials Management to complete, especially when taking into consideration the one-hundred and twenty (120) day personal protective equipment (PPE) and other critical inventory items added after the COVID-19 pandemic. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronny Leffel, 925-550-2299 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Services Provided by Medline Industries, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) CCRMC Materials Management has previously utilized purchase order or service contract agreements for various CCRMC annual inventory services. Due to significant staff turnover in the CCRMC Materials Management Unit, a service contract request was not submitted in a timely manner for the services needed for the annual physical inventory of supplies. Considering the time lapse since the services were provided and the time it will take the department to establish a contract, the department is seeking to pay the vendor as soon as feasible. The contractor is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of its services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. The theory provides that where a contractor has been asked to provide services without a valid contract, and the contractor does so to the benefit of the County, the contractor is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. The department cannot pay the contractor for services rendered as they lack the necessary instrument to issue payment. As such, the department is requesting that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment not to exceed $40,626 for the annual physical inventory supplies services provided. The department has added this contractual need to its contract monitoring and tracking to prevent this from occurring again, and a contract will be established for the future service needs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, Medline Industries, Inc. will not be paid for services rendered in good faith. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and ACKNOWLEDGE that, by its terms the contract between the County and Acclaim Mobility, LLC, pertaining to providing non-emergency transportation services for Contra Costa Health Plan members and initially approved on July 13, 2021 (Item C.69), with a total payment limit of $300,000, does not terminate on the date previously specified in the Board action but, instead, terminates on June 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: This action not will result in additional contractual expenditures. BACKGROUND: CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network providing non-emergency medical transportation services including but not limited to wheelchair van services for CCHP members since July 2021. On July 13, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-359 with Acclaim Mobility LLC, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for the provision of non-emergency medical transportation services for CCHP members for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. Due to an administrative oversight, the Board Order was executed with the term July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This Board Order corrects the term previously approved by the Board on July 13, 2021, to match the term of the contract of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommendation is not approved, the term on the Board Order and term set forth on the contract will not be consistent. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-5468 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Rescind Prior Board Action Pertaining to Contracted Services with Acclaim Mobility, LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to purchase, on behalf of the Health Services Director, 400 BART ticket vouchers each with a $10 value totaling $4,000 and 500 bus tickets for AC Transit and County Connection each with a $5 value totaling $2,500 for clients of the Health Care for the Homeless Program, as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: This $6,500 expenditure will be entirely funded by federal Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funding. BACKGROUND: The Health Care for the Homeless Program receives funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to provide health care for the homeless population in Contra Costa County. The program provides street medicine to homeless patients and helps connect patients to established health services through the Health Department’s clinics, especially for ancillary services that cannot be provided by a mobile team on the street (e.g. x-rays, lab services, etc.). To ensure appointment compliance and access to care, many patients need transportation vouchers. Approval of these purchases will support homeless patients in accessing necessary health services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If these purchases are not approved, the Health Care for the Homeless Program would not be fulfilling the goals outlined in the grant nor would it be providing services necessary for homeless people to receive health care. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rachael Birch, (925) 608-5123 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Transportation Vouchers for Health Care for the Homeless RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Brownfields Assessment Coalition memorandum of agreement between the County, the City of Richmond (City), Eden Housing, and Community Housing and Development Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC), for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024, to acknowledge County participation in the coalition, as required by the terms of a $600,000 assessment grant awarded to the City by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact with this action. BACKGROUND: On October 20,2020, this Board authorized the Public Works Director to sign a letter supporting the City’s application to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a grant under the EPA’s Brownfields Program. The Board action included approval of the County becoming a partner in the City’s Brownfields Assessment Coalition, along with Eden Housing and CHDC. The EPA’s Brownfields Program provides grants and technical assistance to communities, states, tribes and others to assess, safely clean up and sustainably reuse contaminated properties. The City’s application for program funds identified the following five sites in the Richmond area as priority sites for program funds: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessica Dillingham, (925) 957-2453 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Brownfields Assessment Coalition Memorandum of Agreement, Richmond area. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Transit Village-Metro Walk Phase II, at 19th Street and McDonald Ave. Nystrom Village, at Florida Ave. and South 13 th Street. The Former Richmond Health Center, at 100 38th Street. (County owned). Legacy Court Development, at 1329 Fred Jackson Way. (County owned). Former Primo’s Auto site, at 521 23rd Street. The City recently informed County staff that on July 27, 2021, the City was awarded $600,000 by the EPA in response to the joint application for Brownsfield Program funds. The grant period is October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2024. The terms of the grant require the coalition partners to enter into a memorandum of agreement to evidence their commitment to working together to utilize the grant funds for purposes permitted by the grant. The County’s participation in the coalition could reduce the cost to the County of environmental assessments of County-owned property, including the real property located at 100 38 th Street in Richmond, and the real property located at 1329 Fred Jackson Way in North Richmond. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The cost associated with the development of affordable housing projects on certain County-owned property could increase. ATTACHMENTS Memorandum of Agreement 1 BROWNFIELDS ASSESSMENT COALITION MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is between the CITY OF RICHMOND (the “City”), the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA (the “County”), EDEN HOUSING, INC. (“Eden”), and COMMUNITY HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF NORTH RICHMOND (“CHDC”). The City, the County, Eden, and CHDC are each a “Coalition Member.” This MOA documents the roles and responsibilities of the Coalition Members involved in the Assessment Coalition with regard to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Cooperative Agreement No. BF98T22601 (the “Cooperative Agreement”). Agreement 1. Cooperative Agreement Award; Compliance with Cooperative Agreement. On July 27, 2021, EPA awarded the Cooperative Agreement to the City. The project period is October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2024 (the “Project Period”). The City is responsible to the EPA for management of the Cooperative Agreement and compliance with the statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award, and ensuring that all Coalition Members are in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement. 2. Timely Communications. It is the responsibility of the City to provide timely information to the other Coalition Members regarding the management of the Cooperative Agreement and any changes made to the Cooperative Agreement during the Project Period. 3. Contacts. The Coalition Members are the City, the County, CHDC and Eden. The contact information for each Coalition Member is as follows: City of Richmond Charice Duckworth, Development Project Manager Community Development Department – Housing 450 Civil Center Plaza Richmond, California 94804 Email: charice_duckworth@ci.richmond.ca.us Contra Costa County Public Works Department Jessica Dillingham, Principle Real Property Agent 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Email: jessica.dillingham@pw.cccounty.us 2 Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond Joanna Griffith, Director Real Estate Development 1535 Fred Jackson Way, Suite A Richmond, CA 94801 Email: jgriffith@communityhdc.org Eden Housing, Inc. Matt Schreiber, Project Developer 22645 Grand Street Hayward, CA 94541 Email: Matt.Schreiber@edenhousing.org 4. Use of Cooperative Agreement Funds. Activities funded through the Cooperative Agreement may include brownfields inventory preparation, site selection criteria development, assessments, planning related to brownfield sites (including cleanup planning), outreach materials and implementation, and other eligible activities. The City may retain consultants and contractors under 2 CFR 200.317-326 to undertake various activities funded through the Cooperative Agreement and may award subgrants to other Coalition Members under 2 CFR 200.330 for assessment projects in their geographic areas. Subgrantees are accountable to the City for proper expenditure of funds. 5. Contracts. The City, in compliance with 2 CFR 200.317-326 regulations, has amended its existing contract with Stantec Consulting Services for an additional three-year period for environmental engineering services in association with the Cooperative Agreement. The City will maintain responsibility for the execution and payment of all invoices associated with services performed by Stantec Consulting Services under the contract. The City will issue any requests for proposals or requests for qualifications needed to carry out Cooperative Agreement-funded projects and will be responsible for receiving and reviewing submitted proposals and for awarding contracts. The City will consult with other Coalition Members in selecting consultants and contractors and negotiating the terms of agreements. 6. Five-Site Minimum. The City, in consultation with other Coalition Members, will develop a list of proposed project sites that includes a minimum of five sites being assessed during the term of the Cooperative Agreement, and each Coalition Member having an ownership or controlling interest in at least one site on the list. Selected sites will be submitted to the EPA for prior approval to ensure eligibility. 7. Site Specific Agreements. Upon designation of the specific sites, it will be the responsibility of the City to work with the Coalition Member(s) having site control to finalize the scope of work for the consultant or contractor performing work at the site. It will be the responsibility of the Coalition Member(s) having site control to obtain all required permits, easements, and/or access agreements necessary to undertake assessments of the selected site. If the Coalition Member(s) with site control cannot 3 perform these activities, the City may assist in securing the necessary site access agreements and permits. 8. Other Workplan Activities. The City is responsible for ensuring that other activities negotiated in the workplan, such as community outreach and involvement, are implemented in accordance with a schedule agreed upon by the City and the Coalition Member(s) having site control. Agreed by all parties effective the first day of the Grant Period, which was October 1, 2021. CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a corporation and charter city political subdivision of the State of California By: _________________________ By:________________________ Shasa Curl Brian M. Balbas City Manager Public Works Director COMMUNITY HOUSING EDEN HOUSING, a California DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, nonprofit public benefit corporation a California nonprofit public benefit Corporation By: __________________________ By: ________________________ Donald Gilmore Andrea Osgood Executive Director Senior Vice President of Real Estate Development RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement authorizing the Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District (MOFD) to provide emergency ambulance services in the County’s Emergency Response Area III for the period October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: No anticipated General Fund impact: this is a non-financial agreement. BACKGROUND: The long-term ambulance services agreement would authorize MOFD to provide emergency ambulance services in the county’s Emergency Response Area III from October 1, 2022, through June 30, 2025. Emergency Response Area III, located in Moraga and Orinda, is one of five ambulance operating areas in Contra Costa County. MOFD has provided emergency ambulance services in Emergency Response Area III without interruption since before January 1, 1980. The County and the MOFD entered into the most recent ambulance services contract for Emergency Response Area III on October 1, 2019. The existing contract expires September 30, 2022. Under the ambulance services agreement, the MOFD will provide emergency ambulance services as requested by any County-designated public safety dispatch center. The MOFD will provide these services 24 hours a day for the full term of the agreement. The MOFD must staff and equip its ambulances to provide advance life support care, including staffing each ambulance with at least one paramedic and one emergency medical technician (EMT). The agreement establishes response time standards that the MOFD must meet when responding to emergency calls. It also establishes clinical, personnel, vehicle, communications equipment, and other standards that the MOFD must meet. The County’s five Emergency Response Areas are “exclusive operating areas” that were established in accordance with Health and Safety Code section 1797.224 (Section 224), a provision of the EMS Act (the “Emergency Medical Services System and the "Prehospital Emergency Medical APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marshall Bennett, 925-608-5454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #23-768 with the Moraga-Orinda Fire District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Care Personnel Act,” codified at Health and Safety Code sections 1797 through 1799.207). Under Section 224, a competitive process to select an ambulance provider for an exclusive operating area is not required if the local EMS agency develops or implements a local plan that continues the use of existing providers operating within a local EMS area in the manner and scope in which the services have been provided without interruption since January 1, 1981. Because the MOFD has provided emergency ambulance services in Emergency Response Area III without interruption since before January 1, 1980, the District is “grandfathered with exclusivity” under Section 224 and a competitive process is not required for this contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County would not have a long-term emergency ambulance services contract for Emergency Response Area III. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. APPROVE the HOME Investment Partnerships Program - American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Allocation Plan as an amendment to the FY 2021/22 HOME Action Plan to add the HOME-ARP funding allocation of $12,090,215. 2. AUTHORIZE the Department of Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute program certifications and applications (SF-424's) for transmittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no general fund impact. $12,090,215 HOME-ARP funding (100% federal funds - American Rescue Plan). CFDA # HOME 14.239. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristin Sherk 925-655-2889 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:HOME-ARP Allocation Plan - Substantial Amendment to the County's FY 2021/22 HOME Action Plan BACKGROUND: The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 appropriated $5 billion to assist individuals or households who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, and other vulnerable populations, by providing rental housing, rental assistance, supportive services, and non-congregate shelter, to reduce homelessness and increase housing stability. The funds were allocated by formula to jurisdictions that qualified for funding through the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME Program) from HUD. This special one-time round of funding is called the “HOME-ARP” program. In September 2021, HUD awarded the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium (which consists of Contra Costa County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek) $12,090,215 in HOME-ARP funds. The County, as lead agency of the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium, must prepare a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan that is approved by HUD to receive the funds. The recommended actions are to approve the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan (Attachment A), which identifies the eligible uses and funding for the eligible categories of HOME-ARP funds as an amendment to the FY 2021/22 Action Plan which adds the additional HOME-ARP funds and eligible uses to the FY 2021/22 Action Plan that the Board approved on May 11, 2021. Eligible activities that may be funded with HOME-ARP include: Preservation and Production of Affordable Rental Housing Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Housing Related Supportive Services, Homeless Prevention Services, and Housing Counseling Purchase and Development of Non-Congregate Shelters (NCS) Capacity Building and Operating Assistance to Non-Profit Organizations Program Administration and Planning Funds must primarily benefit individuals and households in the following Qualifying Populations: Experiencing homelessness (as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 "Homeless" (1), (2), or (3)) At risk of homelessness (as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 "At risk of homelessness") Fleeing domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking (as defined in 24 CFR 5.2003) Other populations with high risk of housing instability (including highly cost-burdened low-income households, households who have moved two or more times in the last 60 days, and households living in a motel/hotel) Use of HOME-ARP Funding Contra Costa County proposes to use HOME-ARP funding to acquire, develop, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing and/or permanent supportive rental housing units to serve Qualifying Populations and for the administration of the program: Development of affordable rental housing $10,276,683 Administration and planning $1,813,532 Total HOME-ARP Allocation $12,090,215 The approval of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan is the necessary first step for the County to receive the HOME-ARP funds from HUD. The specific allocations of the HOME-ARP funds to individual projects will take place through the County's Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) annual Request For Proposal process for federal funds. The application for eligible applicants to apply for the HOME-ARP funds will become available on October 20, 2022 and due on December 19, 2022. DCD staff will then evaluate the project applications received and provide recommendations to the County's Affordable Housing Finance Committee in March/April 2023, with final project recommendations coming to the Board of Supervisors in May 2023. Community Outreach and Stakeholder Input Because of HOME-ARP’s focus on homeless populations, HUD required an additional stakeholder input process before approval of the HOME-ARP allocation plan by the Board. County DCD staff presented at a stakeholder meeting hosted by the County Continuum of Care. Over 2,000 individuals from service providers, affordable housing developers, and local government staff were invited to attend the meeting hosted virtually on February 14, 2022. At the meeting, feedback on the unmet and priority needs in the County were solicited. Full notes from the meeting are included in the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as Appendix A. Feedback from the Stakeholder meeting identified the development of affordable rental housing as the top priority for HOME-ARP funding (over 60% of respondents). DCD staff then followed up by publishing a general online survey from April 4, 2022 – June 1, 2022. The online survey requested information from stakeholders, affordable housing developers, and community members about homelessness needs in the County and HOME-ARP eligible activities and projects planned. The survey was posted online in English and Spanish at http://www.contracostaca.gov/HOME-ARP, posted on County department social media platforms, and sent via email to an interested parties list of over 600 individuals representing various nonprofit/community based organizations and public agencies. DCD received 165 responses in English and one response in Spanish in total and these are included in the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as Appendix B. Summary survey responses identified the development of affordable rental housing as the top priority for HOME-ARP funding (over 85% of respondents). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A delay in approving the draft HOME-ARP Allocation Plan may jeopardize the County in receiving the HOME-ARP funds from HUD. ATTACHMENTS Draft HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Contra Costa County Consortium HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) Allocation Plan AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2021/22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN C ONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 30 MUIR ROAD MARTINEZ, CA 94553 Draft Revised September 23, 2022 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 2 | Page Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Consultation ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Agencies/Organizations Consulted .......................................................................................................... 4 Public Participation ............................................................................................................................................... 6 NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND GAPS ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 7 Homeless Needs Inventory and Gaps Analysis ................................................................................................ 10 Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table ........................................................................................... 11 Homeless Needs Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 15 Public Housing Agency Information ..................................................................................................................... 17 HOME-ARP ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Use of HOME-ARP Funding .............................................................................................................................. 24 HOME-ARP PRODUCTION HOUSING GOALS ............................................................................................................... 25 Preferences ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 HOME-ARP Refinancing Guidelines .................................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX A – COC STAKEHOLDER MEETING NOTES – 2/14/2022 ................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX B - GENERAL SURVEY RESULTS – ENGLISH AND SPANISH .................................................................................. 44 APPENDIX C – CITIZEN PARTICIPATION & PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ........................................................................... 79 Appendix D – Board of Supervisors Approval 9/20/2022 ................................................................................... 82 Appendix E – Certifications & SF-424s ................................................................................................................ 83 In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California Law, it is the policy of the Consortium to offer documents in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format or if you require any other accommodation or language assistance, please contact Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development at (925) 655-2 708. Hearing impaired individuals may call the California Relay Service at (800) 735-2929 or TDD (925) 779-7081 for assistance. Introduction The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 appropriated $5 billion to assist individuals or households who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, and other vulnerable populations, by providing rental housing, rental assistance, supportive services, and non-congregate shelter, to reduce homelessness and increase housing stability. The funds were allocated by formula to jurisdictions that qualified for funding through the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME Program) from the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This special one-time round of funding is called the “HOME-ARP” program. In September 2021, HUD awarded the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium (which consists of Contra Costa County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek) $12,090,215 in HOME-ARP funds. Eligible activities that may be funded with HOME-ARP include: o Preservation and Production of affordable rental housing o Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) o Housing Related Supportive Services, Homeless Prevention Services, and Housing Counseling o Purchase and Development of Non-Congregate Shelters (NCS) o Non-Profit Operating and Capacity Building o Administration and Planning Costs HUD issued guidance for the utilization of the HOME-ARP funds through CPD-Notice 21-10 on September 13, 2021 to ensure the funds are intended to benefit qualifying populations and be used for specific activities not necessarily normally permitted under the HOME Program. The following allocation plan follows the guidance provided by HUD in that notice. Consultation Before developing its plan, a PJ must consult with the CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, homeless and domestic violence service providers, veterans’ groups, public housing agencies (PHAs), public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities, at a minimum. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. DESCRIBE THE CONSULTATION PROCESS INCLUDING METHODS USED AND DATES OF CONSULTATIONS: The County began the consultation process by utilizing a regularly scheduled Stakeholder meeting with the local Continuum of Care (CoC). Over 2,000 individuals from service providers, affordable housing developers, and local government staff were invited to the meeting held virtually on February 14, 2022. At the meeting feedback on the unmet and priority needs in the County were solicited. Full notes from the meeting are included as Appendix A. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 4 | Page The County followed up with publishing a general online survey from April 4, 2022 – June 1, 2022. The online survey requesting information from stakeholders, affordable housing developers, and community members about homelessness needs in the County and HOME-ARP eligible activities and projects planned. The survey was posted online in English and Spanish at http://www.contracostaca.gov/HOME-ARP posted on County department social media platforms and sent via email to the County’s Interested Parties List. 165 responses in English and 1 response in Spanish were received in total and are included as Appendix B. Summary responses identified the development of affordable housing as the top priority for HOME-ARP funding as shown below. List of Agencies/Organizations Consulted Agency/Org Consulted Type of Agency/Org Method of Consultation Feedback Shelter Inc. of Contra Costa County Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Catholic Charities of the East Bay Services Provider – Homeless & Domestic Violence Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. RCF Connects Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Contra Costa County – Health Housing Homeless Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Bay Area Rescue Mission Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Christian Church Homes Affordable Housing Developer Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Trinity Center Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Hope Solutions Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 5 | Page City of Antioch Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Contra Costa County – Employment Human Services Department Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. City of Brentwood Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Contra Costa County – Behavioral Health Mental Health Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. City of Martinez Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. City of Concord Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. City of Richmond Other Government - Local Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Elder Focus Housing Aff. Housing Consultant Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. St. Vincent De Paul Homeless Service Provider Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Hume Center Service Provider – Mental Health Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Home Base CCC Homeless Service Provider/CoC Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Notes from the meeting are included in Appendix A. Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) Service Provider – Fair Housing Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B. Bay Area Legal Aid Service Provider – Tenant Landlord and Fair Housing Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Independent Living Resource Center Service Provider – Serving Persons with Disabilities Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Ujima Family Recovery Services Service Provider – Family Resource Center Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Contra Costa Crisis Center/211 Service Provider – Local 211 Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Housing Authority of Contra Costa Public Housing Authority Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B City of Pittsburg Housing Authority Public Housing Authority Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Monument Crisis Center Service Provider – Family Resource Center Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Department of Veterans Affairs Other Government - Local Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Contra Costa County Veteran Program Other Government - Local Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 6 | Page Emailed general survey for input Community Violence Solutions Service Provider – Victims of Sexual Assault and Human Trafficking Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B National Alliance on Mental Illness – Contra Costa County Service Provider – Mental Health Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) – Contra Costa Civil Rights Organization Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B STAND! For Families Free of Violence Service Provider – Family Violence Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting and Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Family Justice Center Service Provider – Family Violence Invited to the Virtual Stakeholder Meeting – 2/14/2022 General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Greater Richmond Interfaith Program: Homeless Services Service Provider - Homeless Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) Alameda and Contra Costa Aff. HSG Member Org. Emailed general survey for input General Survey responses are included in Appendix B Public Participation PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow its adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. For the purposes of HOME-ARP, PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive, • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. DESCRIBE THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS, INCLUDING INFORMATION ABOUT AND THE DATES OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING(S) HELD DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN: Public hearings and comment period dates are being held at the following dates: o The HOME-ARP Allocation Plan was made available for public comment on September 23, 2022, for an 18-day public comment period. It was published on the County’s website. o The County notified the public of the publication of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan with a notice in the local newspaper, East Bay Times, and by emailing local providers a link to the County’s website where the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan is published. The County also notified the public by posting on the County Department social media platforms. o The Board of Supervisors held a public hearing via Zoom on October 11, 2022 at 9:00 am. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 7 | Page DESCRIBE ANY EFFORTS TO BROADEN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Public outreach related to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan has involved broad engagement with community- based organizations, affordable housing developers, and local public agencies through the County’s Citizen Participation Plan process. The public notice was published in English in the East Bay Times, as well as being translated into: o Spanish - La Opinión De La Bahía o Chinese - Sing Tao USA Newspaper o Tagalog – Asian Journal Each public notice stated the accessibility and reasonable accommodations of the Board of Supervisors public meeting held on October 11, 2022. In addition, the County emailed providers a link to the County’s website where the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan was published as well as posting on County social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. The email/posts informed the recipient of day/time the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan public hearing at the Board of Supervisors and encouraged providers to share and provide feedback on the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. A PJ must consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at a public hearing, when preparing the HOME-ARP allocation plan. SUMMARIZE THE COMMENTS RECEIVED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS: There were numerous comments received from both the CoC Stakeholders meeting and general online survey that was distributed during the consultation process and available on the County’s website. All comments collected from the Stakeholders meeting and the survey were compiled and are found in Appendix A and B. SUMMARIZE ANY COMMENTS OR RECOMMENDATIONS NOT ACCEPTED AND THE REASONS WHY: There were comments collected from the general online survey and consultation process that were not accepted as they were not within the purview of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. Although some comments were not accepted, all comments are included below different Appendices. NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND GAPS ANALYSIS PJs must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of those populations. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. HUD issued guidance for the utilization of the HOME-ARP funds through CPD-Notice 21-10 on September 13, 2021. The HOME-ARP funding is different from traditional HOME funding. Traditional HOME grants fund the construction or development of affordable housing, including the acquisition and rehabilitation of housing for renters or owners, for households that earn 80 percent or less of the Area Median Income (AMI), known as very-low to low-income households. HOME funds, in addition to paying for construction activities, can Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 8 | Page fund down payment assistance to homebuyers or rental assistance for households who rent their home. HOME funds cannot be used for provision of services or for the development of shelters. Key differences for the HOME-ARP funding are outlined in the HUD issued CPD-Notice 21-10. The notice outlines a range of activities that can be funded under this special allocation and the populations that can be served. HOME-ARP funds can be used for the following: 1) administration and planning activities, 2) acquisition, rehabilitation, and construction of rental housing, 3) provision of supportive services, 4) tenant based rental assistance, 5) acquisition and development of non-congregate shelter units, and 6) non-profit operating and capacity building. Non-congregate shelter units were utilized by many communities nation- wide to house homeless individuals and families safely, minimizing exposure and spread of COVID-19. The populations that can be served with HOME-ARP funds are different from traditional HOME funding requirements. HOME-ARP funds can only be used to serve specific populations, known as Qualifying Populations. Qualifying populations are defined as follows and additional information about the Qualifying Populations can be found in Section IV.A of CPD-Notice 21- 10.: Homeless households, as defined by HUD. Homeless households are individuals and families who lack a fixed, regular, or adequate nighttime residence. These individuals have a primary nighttime residence in a public or private place not meant for human habitation or is living in a public or privately operates ether designated to provide temporary living arrangements (including congregate shelters, transitional housing, and hotels or motels paid for by charitable organizations or by government programs. Data provided in Tables 5.1 and 5.3 include people who accessed programs for literally homeless households per the HUD definition. Households at risk of homelessness. An individual or family who is extremely low income and has moved because of economic reasons two or more times during the previous 60 days, is living in the home of another because of economic hardship, has been notified in writing that their right to occupy their current housing or living situation will be terminated within 21 days, lives in a hotel/motel and the cost of the hotel/motel is not paid by charitable organizations or other subsidy program, lives in a single-room occupancy or efficiency apartment in which there are more than two persons residing, is exiting a publicly funded institution or system of care, or otherwise lives in housing that has characteristics associated with instability. Households fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking. Households requiring services to prevent homelessness. These are households who have been previously qualified as homeless and are currently housed but receiving financial assistance to stay housed. Households at greatest risk of housing instability. For HOME-ARP funds, this means a household that is either extremely-low income (earns less than 30% AMI) AND is experiencing severe cost burden (paying more than 50% of monthly income towards housing costs); or is low-income (earns between 31-50% AMI) AND meets one of the conditions of "at risk of homelessness". Veterans or families with a veteran who also meet one or more of the above definitions. Since these are the only populations the County may serve under this funding resource, the County will only evaluate data regarding the housing gaps for this data population. The Area Median Income is updated Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 9 | Page annually by HUD for purposes of the HOME Program and vary by household size. For Contra Costa County, the 2022 median income for a household of 4 persons is $142,800. The data analysis in this Allocation Plan will focus on extremely-low income households, with annual incomes of up to 30% AMI. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 10 | Page Homeless Needs Inventory and Gaps Analysis Homeless Current Inventory Homeless Population Gap Analysis Family Adults Only Vets Family (at least 1 child) Adult (w/out child) Vets Victims of DV Family Adults Only # of beds # of units # of beds # of beds # of beds # of units # of beds Emergency Shelter 160 66 584 0 Transitional Housing 93 37 88 20 Permanent Supportive Housing 649 239 593 383 Other Permanent Housing 3 1 13 0 Sheltered Homeless 57 573 35 70 Unsheltered Homeless 17 2,095 95 148 Current Gap - 888* - 326* 817 Data Sources: 2022 PIT Report and 2021 HIC Report *While it may appear from the table that there are enough beds and/or units for unsheltered families experiencing homelessness, the number of persons requiring a ‘bed’ within a unit per family may not equate to the number of beds in an available unit, therefore leaving ‘beds’ unfilled even as the units themselves are occupied. There is in fact a long waiting list for family units. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 11 | Page Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Non-Homeless Current Inventory Level of Need Gap Analysis # of Units # of Households # of Households Total Rental Units 132,061 Rental Units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At risk) 13,284 Rental Units Affordable to HH at 50% AMI (Other Pop) 16,562 0% - 30% AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing problems1 (At Risk) 25,850 30% - 50% AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing problems (Other Pop) 17,950 Current Gaps 13,954 Data Sources: 2014-2018 CHAS and 2014-2018 ACS data DESCRIBE THE SIZE AND DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF QUALIFYING POPULATIONS WITHIN THE PJ’S BOUNDARIES: People Experiencing Homelessness Over 3,000 people were identified through the Point in Time count for 2022 as literally homeless, a significant increase from the previously completed PIT count in 2020 (2,277 people). PIT data collection captures about 1/2 of the number of people served in programs for literally homeless during the calendar year. This highlights one reason the PIT count may not be best indicator of need in the community. • The 9,119 people who engaged in homeless services (in prevention and diversion, crisis response, and in permanent supportive housing) in the county represent a wide variety of demographic groups. 79% of enrollments were in programs for people experiencing literal homelessness. In an effort to better understand the demographic makeup of those experiencing literal homelessness, details about household type, age, race, ethnicity, Veteran status, chronicity, disability status, and exposure are discussed below. • Household types – 85% of households experiencing literal homelessness (per the HUD definition) are single adults. • Age – Adults between the ages of 25 and 54 made up just over half (51%) of the people who accessed homeless for people experiencing literal homelessness during calendar year 2021. • Race and Ethnicity – Those accessing programs for people experiencing literal homelessness in Contra Costa were 43% White, 38% African American, 8% Native American, 5% multiple races, 2% Asian, and 2% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Regardless of race, 18% were Hispanic/Latin(a)(o)(e)(x). • Veterans – Service data for calendar year 2021 identified 353 Veterans in programs for people experiencing literal homelessness (47%); 42% of Veterans served in the CoC are chronically homeless. 1 The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Cost burden is the ratio to housing costs to household income. For renters, housing costs is gross rent (contract rent plus utilities). Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 12 | Page • Chronically Homeless – During 2021, half of all households in programs for literal homelessness (50%) were chronically homeless. Chronic consumers are those experiencing homelessness for at least a year, or repeatedly over the last three years, while also struggling with a disabling condition such as serious mental illness, substance use disorder, or a physical or cognitive disability. Chronically homeless consumers are generally the most difficult to move from the streets and back into housing. • People with Disabilities – More than ¾ (76%) of households accessing programs for literal homelessness had at least one family member with a disabling condition. • Interpersonal Violence – 20% of people served in crisis response had experienced interpersonal violence sometime during their lifetime; 77% of these reported fleeing domestic violence at the time they enrolled into a homeless service. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 13 | Page The 2022 PIT County was a community-wide effort to identify sheltered and unsheltered people in Contra Costa County on the night of February 23, 2022. In the weeks following the street count, a survey was administered to 326 people experiencing homelessness; the majority of which were unsheltered the night of the count. The date captures the experiences and characteristics of the unsheltered population and supplements the full count data. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 14 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 15 | Page Homeless Needs Assessment Population Estimate the # of persons experiencing homelessness on a given night Estimate the # of persons experiencing homelessness each year Estimate the # of persons exiting homelessness each year Estimate the # of months persons experience homelessness Sheltered Unsheltered Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) 149 64 1,896 719 75 Persons in Households with Only Children 1 2 0 0 N/A Persons in Households with Only Adults 614 2,877 4,954 731 178 Chronically Homeless Individuals 428 1,139 2,607 318 281 Chronic Homeless Families 54 3 509 155 40 Veterans 35 95 353 139 44 Unaccompanied Child 0 0 11 4 0.9 At Risk of Homelessness There is insufficient data to thoroughly or accurately describe the households who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered. This is because the conditions and reasons vary and there is no centralized data source or methodology for collecting this information. However, there are indicators for the characteristics and needs of low-income persons at risk of homelessness or who have recently fallen into homelessness, which can be described in part based on self- report during the PIT counts, and the needs and characteristics of target populations of state and federal funding priorities and existing programs for individuals and households who are currently homeless, which includes rapid rehousing services, including: • A compilation of Bay Area regional data from 2022 PIT indicates that persons experiencing homelessness identify several primary contributors to their homelessness: lack of income or job loss compromises, eviction, and substance use. • Contra Costa EHSD and CCHS partner to serve low-income individuals and families with children who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness due to a court judgement for eviction through the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKS) public assistance program. That population is defined as a family with children in the home with little or no cash and are in need of housing, food, utilities, clothing, or medical care. • EHSD and CCHS also partner on an Adult Protective Services’ Home Safe program to prevent homelessness and stabilize elderly adults who are victims of crime and neglect, which have placed them at risk of homelessness. As reported in the 2014-2018 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 34% of Contra Costa County renters have a household income less than or equal to 30% AMI. Of the 34% Extremely-Low Income (ELI) renter households are experiencing the highest rent burden. Over 81% of ELI renter households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 16 | Page High rent burden on ELI renter households coupled along with severe housing problems is essentially a measure of proxy of a non-income household living in inhabitable conditions and considered at risk of homelessness. Fleeing or Attempting to Flee Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking or Human Trafficking Domestic violence is one of the most underreported crimes in the County and in the nation. One organization providing domestic violence related services, STAND! For Families Free of Violence (STAND) based in Concord, receives over 12,000 calls annually directly to their crisis line and fields additional referrals from law enforcement and local medical providers. Between July 2021 and June 2022, STAND provided shelter or other supportive services to over 2,000 women and their children who were victims of domestic violence. Community Violence Solutions provides sexual assault, human trafficking, and family violence support through prevention, crisis services, and treatment. Nearly all – 97% - of the cases seen involve allegations of abuse by someone the child knows and 60% involve abuse by a family member. In FY 2020/21 387 forensic interviews were conducted as follows: 323 sexual abuse, 29 physical abuse, 13 neglect, 16 witness to allegation, 26 children at risk, 6 witness to violence, and 16 witness to domestic violence. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 17 | Page Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance provides navigation services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse, and human trafficking. Between July 2021 and June 2022, the Family Justice Alliance supported approximately 1,700 individuals in Contra Costa County. Of the 1,700 reported, 66% report domestic violence, 11% sexual assault, 5% stalking, and 2% human trafficking. 70% of those supported have children and the vast majority are low-income with 65% earning less than $2,000 per month. Other Populations Requiring Services or Housing Assistance to Prevent Homelessness and Other Populations at Greatest Risk of Housing Instability Other populations where providing supportive services or assistance would prevent the family’s homelessness or would serve those with the greatest risk of housing instability. Households who have previously been qualified as “homeless”, are currently housed due to temporary or emergency assistance, including financial assistance, services, temporary rental assistance, or some other type of other assistance to allow the household to be housed, and who need additional housing assistance or supportive services to avoid a return to homelessness. Renters in Contra Costa County need to earn $41.77 per hour – 2.7 times the minimum wage or work approximately three full time jobs to afford the average asking rent. Source: Contra Costa County 2022 Affordable Housing Needs Report – California Housing Partnership The Contra Costa County Consortium is served by local Public Housing Authorities (PHA) which prepare an Annual Agency Plan. The three PHAs within the County are the County of Contra Costa, Pittsburg, and Richmond. The number of units of public housing and Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) for the three PHAs serving the HOME Consortium are listed below. Public Housing Agency Information HUD Housing Auth. Code Housing Authority Name Program Type Public Housing/Low Rent Units Low Rent Developments Housing Choice Vouchers CA011 Contra Costa County Combined 963 11 9,368 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 18 | Page CA060 Pittsburg Section 8 0 0 1,133 CA010 Richmond Low-Rent 409 7 0 Total 1,372 18 10,501 Source: HUD Housing Authority Profiles https://pic.hud.gov/pic/haprofiles/haprofiledetails.asp For renters, an example of a particular housing characteristic that have been linked to instability and increased risk of homelessness is a sudden, significant rent increase. People already living with financial insecurity are ill-equipped to handle a sudden increase in such a significant proportion of their expenses, and in a tight housing market such as Contra Costa County and the Bay Area as a whole, an inability to find replacement housing could lead to homelessness. An unexpected health crisis is also a common link to housing instability and homelessness. IDENTIFY AND CONSIDER THE CURRENT RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO ASSIST QUALIFYING POPULATIONS, INCLUDING CONGREGATE AND NON-CONGREGATE SHELTER UNITS, SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, TBRA, AND AFFORDABLE AND PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE RENTAL HOUSING: In fiscal year 2021-2022, Contra Costa County received $16.3 million in Continuum of Care funding and the Health, Housing, and Homeless Services (H3) division of Contra Costa Health Services received an additional $29 million in state and local funds to support housing resources for households at imminent risk of homelessness or currently experiencing homelessness. In June 2022, Contra Costa County and Contra Costa CoC applied to the California Interagency Council on Homelessness (Cal ICH) Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) round 3 funding. Included in that application was a summary of current resources dedicated to addressing homelessness. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Contra Costa County homeless service agencies reduced bed capacity to create social distancing, to reduce the potential exposure for staff and its clients. Where possible non- congregate shelter in place was encouraged. CARES Act allocations under the Emergency Shelter Solutions Grant (ESG-CV) were allocated to the County to provide rapid rehousing, shelter services, homeless prevention, and portable hygiene stations benefiting the homeless. Other sources are allocated to provide services to those who are at imminent risk homelessness through one- time CARES Act allocations under Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) providing housing stability, housing related legal services among others. CARES Act allocations under the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA-CV) to provide short-term rental and utility assistance to persons in the County living with HIV/AIDS. Lastly, one time allocations under the U.S. Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) enabling current renters to stay housed providing rent relief for up to 18 months. For affordable housing production and/or preservation, sources available to Contra County is approx. $25 million for FY 2023/24. Sources include CDBG-Housing, HOME, HOME-ARP, HOPWA, Local Housing Trust, and Local Inclusionary In-Lieu funds. Strategies for these funds include the production of new affordable housing (rental and homeownership), acquisition and rehabilitation (rental and homeownership), and permanent supportive special needs housing units. DESCRIBE THE UNMET HOUSING AND SERVICE NEEDS OF QUALIFYING POPULATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: Sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations Contra Costa’s County Continuum of Care (CoC) has multiple family and adult-only shelters and transitional housing across the county. In the 2022 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) submitted to HUD, the CoC reported Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 19 | Page 780 emergency shelter beds and 245 transitional housing beds. The 2022 Point In Time (PIT) Count revealed 2,329 unsheltered individuals and 764 sheltered individuals across Contra Costa. These two reports demonstrate the high utilization of emergency shelter resources and the high need for additional emergency shelter beds to serve the unsheltered community. Service needs vary based on various barriers and length of time homeless. Based on 2021 HMIS data, 76% of people accessing crisis response services like street outreach and emergency shelter, report a disabling condition and half of the households were identified as being chronically homeless. Increased affordable and permanent supportive housing are needed to address unmet needs. A t R isk of H omelessness The 2014-2018 CHAS data listed Contra Costa County as having 31,625 renter households with incomes at or below 30% AMI (extremely-low income). Renters with extremely-low income represent 23.4% of all renters in Contra Costa County. Other families requiring services or housing assistance or to prevent homelessness and Other Populations at Greatest Risk of Housing Instability Shelter Inc. of Contra Costa County (Shelter Inc.) administers a rent and deposit assistance program in Contra Costa County. The data reported from Shelter Inc. are annual numbers for the fiscal year, July 1 – June 30. In FY 2019/20, Shelter Inc. served 93 households countywide with rental assistance. In 2020/21, the number of households served was 28. FY 2021/22 7 households assisted. In FY 2020/21, the State of California COVID-19 rent relief program was implemented. The State program pays for past due rent and/or future rent. Information on the State’s website can be broken down by county and city. Of the 17,015 applications received by the State from Contra Costa County, 16,593 households were served, providing a total of $218,490,293 of rent relief. Of those households served, 63.29% were ELI households earning up to 30% AMI. The average assistance per household was $13,325.2 IDENTIFY ANY GAPS WITHIN THE CURRENT SHELTER AND HOUSING INVENTORY AS WELL AS THE SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM: Currently, Contra Costa County has limited resources to fund construction or acquisition of new shelter and affordable housing. One time funding sources like Project Home Key has enabled the purchase of 172 units of interim housing in recent years, but ongoing operating costs require additional investment from federal, state, and/or local sources. Contra Costa’s County Continuum of Care (CoC) has multiple family and adult- only shelters and transitional housing across the county. In the 2022 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) submitted to HUD, the CoC reported 780 emergency shelter beds and 245 transitional housing beds. During the Covid- 19 pandemic, Contra Costa County opened several hotel sites to house unsheltered individuals. In the 2022 HIC, these temporary sites represent 219 emergency shelter beds. As of June 30, 2022, all Covid-19 hotel rooms have wound down and this has resulted in a lower inventory of emergency shelter beds. IDENTIFY THE CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSING ASSOCIATED WITH INSTABILITY AND AN INCREASED RISK OF HOMELESSNESS IF THE PJ WILL INCLUDE SUCH CONDITIONS IN ITS DEFINITION OF “OTHER POPULATIONS” AS ESTABLISHED IN THE HOME-ARP NOTICE: 2 Data from the State of California Dashboard as of September 19, 2022 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 20 | Page The high cost of housing and impacts of Covid-19 increase risk of homelessness in Contra Costa County. According to a December 2021 report 3 from the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, Contra Costa renters have an estimated debt of $5,424. As mentioned elsewhere in this Allocation Plan, high-cost burden is one the housing characteristics strongly linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness. As reported in the 2014-2018 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 34% of Contra Costa County renters have a household income less than or equal to 30% AMI. Of the 34% Extremely-Low Income (ELI) renter households are experiencing the highest rent burden. Over 81% of ELI renter households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent. High rent burden on ELI renter households coupled along with severe housing problems is essentially a measure of proxy of a non-income household living in inhabitable conditions and considered at risk of homelessness. Summary Level: County Data for: Contra Costa County; California Year Selected: 2014-2018 ACS Income Distribution Overview Owner Renter Total Household Income <= 30% HAMFI 16,810 31,625 48,435 Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI 21,115 20,335 41,450 Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI 26,450 18,655 45,105 Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI 21,355 14,480 35,835 Household Income >100% HAMFI 171,795 49,655 221,450 Total 257,530 134,750 392,275 Housing Problems Overview 1 Owner Renter Total Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems 79,750 72,265 152,015 Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems 177,775 62,485 240,260 Total 257,530 134,750 392,275 Severe Housing Problems Overview 2 Owner Renter Total Household has at least 1 of 4 Severe Housing Problems 36,250 43,985 80,235 Household has none of 4 Severe Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems 221,275 90,765 312,040 Total 257,530 134,750 392,275 Housing Cost Burden Overview 3 Owner Renter Total Cost Burden <=30% 181,515 67,545 249,060 Cost Burden >30% to <=50% 44,535 32,015 76,550 Cost Burden >50% 30,010 33,040 63,050 Cost Burden not available 1,475 2,145 3,620 Total 257,530 134,750 392,275 3 https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ELI-Households-Bay-Area-Report-Final-1.pdf Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 21 | Page Income by Housing Problems (Renters only) Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems Total Household Income <= 30% HAMFI 25,850 5,775 31,625 Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI 17,950 2,385 20,335 Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI 12,935 5,720 18,655 Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI 6,965 7,515 14,480 Household Income >100% HAMFI 8,565 41,090 49,655 Total 72,265 62,485 134,750 Income by Cost Burden (Renters only) Cost burden > 30% Cost burden > 50% Total Household Income <= 30% HAMFI 25,495 21,515 31,625 Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI 17,070 8,545 20,335 Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI 11,610 2,415 18,655 Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI 5,680 460 14,480 Household Income >100% HAMFI 5,200 105 49,655 Total 65,055 33,040 134,750 1. The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. 2. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. 3. Cost burden is the ratio of housing costs to household income. For renters, housing cost is gross rent (contract rent plus utilities). IDENTIFY PRIORITY NEEDS FOR QUALIFYING POPULATIONS: Priority needs for households at risk of homelessness and sheltered and unsheltered people experiencing homelessness include increased resources across a full spectrum of supports ranging from one-time financial assistance to permanent supportive housing and permanently deeply affordable housing. In April 2021, Contra Costa County adopted the Regional Action Plan (RAP) to reduce unsheltered homelessness by 75%. This plan establishes a 1-2-4 framework that proposes for every unit of interim housing, the County will need to provide two units of permanent housing and four units of homelessness prevention. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 22 | Page EXPLAIN HOW THE LEVEL OF NEED AND GAPS IN ITS SHELTER AND HOUSING INVENTORY AND SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS BASED ON THE DATA PRESENTED IN THE PLAN WERE DETERMINED: The data used to assess needs and gaps in shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems was gathered through various systems including HMIS, the 2022 PIT Count, the 2022 HIC Report, Contra Costa County Continuum of Care 2021 Annual Report, as well as ACS and CHAS to provide quantitative data and serve as a basis for the identification of unmet needs. In addition, feedback was solicited from over 36 organizations that identified their support for and a documented community need for new affordable housing production for extremely-low income renters. In addition, 165 individuals completed the online HOME-ARP survey to voice their opinions on the use of HOME- ARP funds in Contra Costa County. This feedback provided qualitative data from which to support the development of priority needs, and the resulting identification of system and service delivery gaps in Contra Costa County. HOME-ARP ACTIVITIES DESCRIBE THE METHOD FOR SOLICITING APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDING AND/OR SELECTING DEVELOPERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, SUBRECIPIENTS AND/OR CONTRACTORS AND WHETHER THE PJ WILL ADMINISTER ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY: Contra Costa County proposes to use HOME-ARP funding to acquire, develop, rehabilitate, or preserve affordable rental housing and/or permanent supportive rental housing units to serve Qualifying Populations, and for administration of the program. The development of affordable rental housing and/or permanent supportive housing is the top priority for the HOME-ARP funds. Non-profit and for-profit housing developers seeking HOME-ARP dollars for eligible rental housing development projects will submit applications for funding to the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) using the online application portal at http://www.citydataservices.net. Each year, DCD issues a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) to award available federal funding to housing projects throughout the County. Funds may include CDBG Entitlement – Urban County, HOME Consortium, State of California, or local funding. For the NOFA to be issued fall 2022, HOME-ARP funds are proposed to be included in the annual application cycle. The County will use HOME-ARP funds to leverage the annual NOFA funds. Projects will be evaluated by staff using DCDs underwriting process. Funding recommendations will be made to Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors who will ultimately make all funding decisions. The following threshold criteria must be met by an application to be considered for an HOME-ARP award: 1) the project must include the creation or preservation of permanent affordable rental housing 2) the housing must remain affordable in perpetuity after the expiration of the HOME-ARP required period via executed legal written agreements, 3) at least one of the County’s Consolidated Plan housing priorities must be addressed, and 4) there must be a reasonable expectation that the project will be ready to proceed/begin construction by June 30, 2025. Applications must include a description of the eligible activities to be conducted with the HOME-ARP funds and must certify that housing units assisted with the HOME-ARP will comply with HOME-ARP requirements. All applicants seeking funding for affordable multi-family rental housing (for new units and rehabilitation of Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 23 | Page existing units) shall describe the plans and tools they have in place to insure HOMEARP assisted units will be available to Qualifying Populations. On a competitive basis, applications that have met the threshold criteria described above will be evaluated according to how and the extent to which they meet the HOME-ARP criteria listed below. These criteria will carry equal importance and weight. The HOME-ARP criteria, together with the criteria and considerations in the Contra Costa County Affordable Housing Program Policies and Procedures will be used to determine project scores for a project’s funding recommendation to the County Board of Supervisors. HOME-ARP Application Evaluation Criteria: Applications submitted in response to the annual NOFA are assessed against federal eligibility requirements, programmatic thresholds, and evaluation criteria in order to fairly evaluate and rank these applications. County staff also strives to use the funds throughout the County and not overly allocate funds in a single area. Applications will first be reviewed by DCD staff to determine if the federal eligibility and programmatic thresholds are satisfied. Projects meeting requirements will be evaluated according to the evaluation criteria. Threshold requirements include: o Long-Term Affordability o Consistency with the Strategic Goals of the Consolidated Plan o Site Control of the proposed site o Capacity and experience of the developer and development team o Financially feasible project o Project implementation schedule and timing As referenced above, additional analysis will be performed by DCD underwriting staff in accordance with DCD’s Policy and Procedures. The following will be assessed and contribute to project scores in the areas of Project Readiness, Financial & Cost Analysis, Developer Experience & Capacity, and Project Targeting & Characteristics prior to making a HOME-ARP funding recommendation to the Board of Supervisors: o Project readiness o Funding commitments from other funding sources o Land use entitlements o Reasonable development costs o Feasible construction and operating budget o Leveraging of HOME-ARP funds o HOME-ARP and other applicable federal cross-cutting requirements The County recognizes that, because many households in the Qualifying Populations are unable to pay rents sufficient to cover unit operating costs, it will be necessary for HOME-ARP project developers to attempt to obtain Federal or State of California project-based rental subsidies, if available. In the absence of project- based rental subsidies, additional flexibilities to provide ongoing operating cost assistance or capitalize a project operating cost assistance reserve to address operating deficits of the HOME-ARP units at a project funded with HOME-ARP funds during the 15-year compliance period. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 24 | Page IF ANY PORTION OF THE PJ’S HOME-ARP ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDS WERE PROVIDED TO A SUBRECIPIENT OR CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO HUD’S ACCEPTANCE OF THE HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN BECAUSE THE SUBRECIPIENT OR CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE PJ’S ENTIRE HOME-ARP GRANT, IDENTIFY THE SUBRECIPIENT OR CONTRACTOR AND DESCRIBE ITS ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN ADMINISTERING ALL OF THE PJ’S HOME-ARP PROGRAM: Not applicable. HOME-ARP Administration funds provided to the Contra Costa County Consortium are maintained to support internal administration and planning costs. Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount % of the Grant Statutory Limit Supportive Services Development of Affordable Rental Housing $10,276,683 Acquisition and Development of Non- Congregate Shelters Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Non-Profit Operating 5% Non-Profit Capacity Building 5% Administration and Planning $1,813,532 15% 15% Total HOME-ARP Allocation $12,090,215 ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE, IF APPLICABLE: Not applicable. DESCRIBE HOW THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SHELTER AND HOUSING INVENTORY, SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM, AND THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED IN THE GAP ANALYSIS PROVIDED A RATIONALE FOR THE PLAN TO FUND ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES: Based on the HUD CHAS data released September 29, 2021, for the 2014-2018 period, it reported Contra Costa County to have a total of 392,275 owner occupied and renter occupied housing units. This is 6,024 units less than reported in the 2020 ACS Experimental Data release. Of the 392,275 total units, 134,750 (34%) are recorded as rental units. Per ACS, Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units table (S2504) for the same period of the 2014-2018 CHAS report, 4.8% of the rental housing inventory was built in 1939 or earlier. 52.5% of the rental housing inventory was built between 1940 and 1979; 31.1% built between 1980 and 1999; and only 3.6% built 2010 or later.4 As reported earlier in this Allocation Plan, Contra Costa County’s lowest income households are experiencing the highest rent burden. 80.6% of ELI households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent, with 68% paying over 50% of their income towards rent. New affordable housing developments typically take 3-7 years from predevelopment to occupancy. The HOME-ARP funds will support Contra Costa County deeply affordable rental developments through the 4 https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=S2504%3A%20PHYSICAL%20HOUSING%20CHARACTERISTICS%20FOR%20OCC UPIED%20HOUSING%20UNITS&g=0500000US06013 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 25 | Page annual NOFA process described above. The actual number of units is to be determined based on the applications to be received during the NOFA process. HOME-ARP PRODUCTION HOUSING GOALS ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING UNITS FOR QUALIFYING POPULATIONS THAT THE PJ WILL PRODUCE OR SUPPORT WITH ITS HOME-ARP ALLOCATION: Based on the average cost to construct a 1-bedroom HOME unit, based on average of recently received project applications, it is estimated that not less than 50 units of affordable rental housing will be produced, or preserved with HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations. New construction of affordable housing development may cost up to $800,000 per unit, depending on the type of construction proposed. Infill sites may be challenging to construct on and therefore may require underground or podium parking with construction of units above. DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING PRODUCTION GOAL THAT THE PJ HOPES TO ACHIEVE AND DESCRIBE HOW IT WILL ADDRESS THE PJ’S HOUSING NEEDS: The County’s 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan evaluated data from prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and outlined strategies to address the affordable housing and supportive services needs in the community. It also outlined strategies to address homelessness. The Consolidated Plan establishes the following priorities for all project and programs funded with CDBG-Housing, HOME, and HOPWA funds. Affordable Housing is considered a priority need in the FY 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan. The County set a goal to construct 150 new affordable rental units utilizing federal funds in the Consolidated Plan. Through the first two years of the five-year period, the County has accomplished 47% of its new construction affordable rental housing goal. Despite this achievement, the consultation with stakeholders stated that affordable rental housing is an ongoing need in the County, especially among renters in the extremely-low income category (earning less than 30% Area Median Income). The County recognizes that, because many households in the Qualifying Populations are unable to pay rents sufficient to cover unit operating costs, it will be necessary for HOME-ARP project developers to attempt to obtain Federal or State of California project-based rental subsidies, if available. In the absence of project- Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 26 | Page based rental subsidies, additional flexibilities to provide ongoing operating cost assistance or capitalize a project operating cost assistance reserve to address operating deficits of the HOME-ARP units at a project funded with HOME-ARP funds during the 15-year compliance period. Preferences IDENTIFY WHETHER THE PJ INTENDS TO GIVE PREFERENCE TO ONE OR MORE QUALIFYING POPULATIONS OR A SUBPOPULATION WITHIN ONE MORE QUALIFYING POPULATIONS FOR ANY ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY OR PROJECT: o Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) o PJs are not required to describe specific projects to which the preferences will apply. All Qualifying Populations will be eligible for a HOME-ARP unit however the HOME-ARP funds will give preference to persons and households (including families) experiencing homelessness in Contra Costa County, who meet the definition of homeless (as defined) in 24 CFR 91.5). The County Departments will partner to identify homeless individuals and households/families within the County who may qualify and choose to live in this type of housing. If the project is unable to identify a sufficient number of County homeless individuals or households/families (as defined in 24 CFR 91.5), who qualify and choose to live this type of housing project(s), the other Qualifying Populations listed below will receive equal access to potential HOME-ARP units: o At risk of homelessness o Individuals or families who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking o Other families requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness o At greatest risk of housing instability Veterans and families that include a veteran in the household that meet the above criteria for one of the Qualifying Populations will also be eligible to occupy a HOME-ARP unit. The County will use a combination of the Coordinated Entry System and other referral methods, as needed, to meet the referral requirements established in Se IV.C.2 of the CPD Notice 21-10 and ensure all HOME-ARP Qualifying Populations can be referred to a HOME-ARP funded project. Policies and procedures will be established for applying the established preference and method of referral. IF A PREFERENCE WAS IDENTIFIED, EXPLAIN HOW THE USE OF A PREFERENCE OR METHOD OF PRIORITIZATION WILL ADDRESS THE UNMET NEED OR GAP IN BENEFITS AND SERVICES RECEIVED BY INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES IN THE QUALIFYING POPULATION OR CATEGORY OF QUALIFYING POPULATION, CONSISTENT WITH THE PJ’S NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND GAPS ANALYSIS. The HOME-ARP funds will be used to create more deeply affordable and permanent supportive rental housing for Qualifying Populations. Upon implementation, HOME-ARP funds will support all Qualifying Populations chronologically through limited coordinated entry system as a referral method. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 27 | Page IF A PREFERENCE WAS IDENTIFIED, DESCRIBE HOW THE PJ WILL USE HOME-ARP FUNDS TO ADDRESS THE UNMET NEEDS OR GAPS IN BENEFITS AND SERVICES OF THE OTHER QUALIFYING POPULATIONS THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PREFERENCE: The County will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefit and services of the other Qualifying Populations that are not included in the preference by serving people experiencing homelessness after all of the referrals for currently homeless individuals and families have been exhausted. HOME-ARP Refinancing Guidelines If the PJ intends to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily rental housing that is being rehabilitated with HOME-ARP funds, the PJ must state its HOME-ARP refinancing guidelines in accordance with 24 CFR 92.206(b). The guidelines must describe the conditions under with the PJ will refinance existing debt for a HOME-ARP rental project, including: O ESTABLISH A MINIMUM LEVEL OF REHABILITATION PER UNIT OR A REQUIRED RATIO BETWEEN REHABILITATION AND REFINANCING TO DEMONSTRATE THAT REHABILITATION OF HOME-ARP RENTAL HOUSING IS THE PRIMARY ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. O REQUIRE A REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DEMONSTRATE THAT DISINVESTMENT IN THE PROPERTY HAS NOT OCCURRED; THAT THE LONG-TERM NEEDS OF THE PROJECT CAN BE MET; AND THAT THE FEASIBILITY OF SERVING QUALIFIED POPULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM COMPLIANCE PERIOD CAN BE DEMONSTRATED. The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. O STATE WHETHER THE NEW INVESTMENT IS BEING MADE TO MAINTAIN CURRENT AFFORDABLE UNITS, CREATE ADDITIONAL AFFORDABLE UNITS, OR BOTH. The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. O SPECIFY THE REQUIRED COMPLIANCE PERIOD, WHETHER IT IS THE MINIMUM 15 YEARS OF LONGER. The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. O STATE THAT HOME-ARP FUNDS CANNOT BE USED TO REFINANCE MULTIFAMILY LOANS MADE OR INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL PROGRAM, INCLUDING CDBG. The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. O OTHER REQUIREMENTS IN THE PJ’S GUIDELINES, IF APPLICABLE. The HOME-ARP funds will not be used to refinance existing debt. Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 28 | Page APPENDIX A – COC STAKEHOLDER MEETING NOTES – 2/14/2022 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 29 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 30 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 31 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 32 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 33 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 34 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 35 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 36 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 37 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 38 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 39 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 40 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 41 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 42 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 43 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 44 | Page APPENDIX B - GENERAL SURVEY RESULTS – ENGLISH AND SPANISH Contra Costa County – HOME-ARP Survey Questions Hello! Thank you for choosing to participate in the HOME-ARP planning survey by Contra Costa County HOME Consortium. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 appropriated $5 billion to assist individuals or households who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, and other vulnerable populations, by providing rental housing, rental assistance, supportive services, and non-congregate shelter, to reduce homelessness and increase housing stability. The funds were allocated by formula to jurisdictions that qualified for funding through the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME Program) from the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This special one-time round of funding is called the “HOME-ARP” program. In September 2021, HUD awarded the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium (which consists of Contra Costa County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek) $12,090,215 in HOME-ARP funds. Eligible activities that may be funded with HOME-ARP include: 1. Preservation and Production of affordable rental housing 2. Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) 3. Housing Related Supportive Services, Homeless Prevention Services, and Housing Counseling 4. Purchase and Development of Non-Congregate Shelters (NCS) Funds must primarily benefit individuals and households in the following qualifying populations: • Experiencing homelessness (as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 “Homeless” (1), (2), or (3)) • At risk of homelessness (as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 “At risk of homelessness”) • Fleeing domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking, (as defined in 24 CFR 5.2003) • Other populations with high risk of housing instability (including highly cost-burdened low-income households, households who have moved two or more times in the last 60 days, and households living in a hotel/motel) We encourage you to share this survey with your colleagues, stakeholders, and partner organizations. The survey should take approximately 10 minutes to complete. For more information on Contra Costa County HOME-ARP program, please visit the HOME-ARP website http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/HOME-ARP or contact us at dcd.housing@dcd.cccounty.us or (925) 655-2708. How are you connected to Contra Costa County? (Answer more than once) a. Live b. Work c. Affordable Housing Developer d. Public Agency Employee e. Continuum of Care – the system of care that guides and tracks homeless individuals and families through an array of housing and services designed to prevent and end homelessness f. Homeless Service Provider g. Veteran’s Group h. Fair Housing, Civil Rights Provider Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 45 | Page i. Public Housing Authority j. Domestic Violence Service Provider k. Organization Serving Persons Living with Disabilities l. Other The world of federal funding comes with a lot of jargon. Below are definitions for terms that are used frequently in relation to HOME-ARP funds and found in this survey. AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS: An individual or family who is extremely low income and has moved because of economic reasons two or more times during the previous 60 days, is living in the home of another because of economic hardship, has been notified in writing that their right to occupy their current housing or living situation will be terminated within 21 days, lives in a hotel/motel and the cost of the hotel/motel is not paid by charitable organizations or other subsidy program, lives in a single-room occupancy or efficiency apartment in which there are more than two persons residing, is exiting a publicly funded institution or system of care, or otherwise lives in housing that has characteristics associated with instability. GREATEST RISK OF HOUSING INSTABILITY: For HOME-ARP funds, this means a household that is either extremely-low income (earns less than 30% AMI) AND is experiencing severe cost burden (paying more than 50% of monthly income towards housing costs); or is low-income (earns between 31-50% AMI) AND meets one of the conditions of "at risk of homelessness". NON-CONGREGATE SHELTER: As opposed to congregate settings, such as traditional homeless shelters, non- congregate shelter provides more private accommodations (individual rooms). QUALIFYING POPULATIONS: For HOME-ARP funds, this means people experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, fleeing domestic violence dating violence, sexual violence, stalking, human trafficking, or otherwise at high risk of housing instability. SUPPORTIVE SERVICES: HOME-ARP funds may be used for services to provide a broad range of supportive services including childcare, education services, employment assistance/job training, food, housing search and counseling services, legal services, life skills training, mental health services, case management, and transportation. TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE: A rent subsidy to help households afford housing costs, such as rent and security deposits. "Tenant-based" means the subsidy is attached to the household, and they can use it to rent any rental unit that meets program guidelines and whose landlord is willing to accept the subsidy payment. 1. Would you support the use of HOME-ARP funds for either the new construction or rehab of permanent affordable rental housing? (One answer only) a. Yes b. No c. Unsure Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 46 | Page 2. Would you support the use of HOME-ARP funds for a non-congregate shelter project? (NCS is one or more buildings shelter to individuals and families and does not require them to sign a lease) (One answer only) a. Yes b. No c. Unsure 3. Is there a need for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance in Contra Costa County? (One answer only) a. Yes b. No c. Unsure 4. Rate the following eligible activities in order of need with 1 being greatest need and 4 being least needed: a. Non-Congregate Shelter b. Permanent affordable rental housing units c. Housing-related supportive services d. Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 5. Among the following Qualifying Populations (see Definitions above for more information on QP household) who are eligible for HOME-ARP funding, where is the most need in Contra Costa County? Rank the following with 1 being greatest need and 5 being the least needed: a. Currently homeless b. At risk of homelessness c. Fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking d. Other populations where assistance would prevent homelessness or serve those with greatest risk of housing instability 6. In your opinion, how difficult is it to get into a shelter in Contra Costa County? (One answer only) a. Extremely difficult b. Somewhat difficult c. Neutral d. Somewhat easy e. Extremely easy f. I don’t know 7. Among individuals in Contra Costa County who qualify as a Qualifying Population household (see Definitions above for more information on QP household), please identify which group faces the most barriers to ending their homelessness? (One answer only) a. Youth b. Seniors c. Persons with mental health conditions or substance abuse disorders d. Persons with disabilities Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 47 | Page 8. What needs or gaps do you see in the construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of Non-Congregate Shelter in Contra Costa County? 9. What needs of gaps do you see in the production or preservation of permanent affordable rental housing in Contra Costa County? 10. What needs or gaps do you see in housing related supportive services in Contra Costa County? 11. What unmet housing or service needs or gaps do you see in Tenant-Based Rental Assistance in Contra Costa County? Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 48 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 49 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 50 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 51 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 52 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 53 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 54 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 55 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 56 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 57 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 58 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 59 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 60 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 61 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 62 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 63 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 64 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 65 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 66 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 67 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 68 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 69 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 70 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 71 | Page Condado de Contra Costa – HOME-ARP Preguntas de la encuesta ¡Hola! Gracias por elegir participar en la encuesta de planificación HOME-ARP realizada por el Consorcio HOME del Condado de Contra Costa. La Ley del Plan de Rescate Estadounidense de 2021 asignó $ 5 mil millones para ayudar a las personas y familias sin hogar, en riesgo de quedarse sin hogar y otras poblaciones vulnerables, al proporcionar viviendas de alquiler, asistencia de alquiler, servicios de apoyo y refugio no congregado, para reducir la falta de vivienda y aumentar la estabilidad de la vivienda. Los fondos se asignaron por fórmula a las jurisdicciones que calificaron para recibir fondos a través del Programa de Asociación de Inversión HOME (HOME) del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD). Esta ronda especial de financiamiento único se llama "HOME-ARP". En septiembre de 2021, HUD otorgó al Consorcio HOME del Condado de Contra Costa (que consiste en el Condado de Contra Costa y las Ciudades de Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg y Walnut Creek) $ 12,090,215 en fondos HOME-ARP que se puede usar en cualquiera communidad en el Condado. Las actividades elegibles que pueden ser financiadas con HOME-ARP incluyen: 1. Preservación y producción de viviendas de alquiler asequibles 2. Asistencia de alquiler basada en el inquilino (TBRA) 3. Servicios de apoyo relacionados con la vivienda, servicios de prevención de personas sin hogar y asesoramiento sobre vivienda 4. Compra y desarrollo de refugios no congregados (NCS) Los fondos deben beneficiar principalmente a individuos y hogares en las siguientes poblaciones calificadas: • Experimentar la falta de vivienda (como se define en 24 CFR 91.5 "Sin hogar" (1), (2) o (3)) • En riesgo de falta de vivienda (como se define en 24 CFR 91.5 "En riesgo de falta de vivienda") • Huir de la violencia doméstica, la violencia en el noviazgo, la agresión sexual, el acecho o la trata de personas (como se define en 24 CFR 5.2003) Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 72 | Page • Otras poblaciones con alto riesgo de inestabilidad de la vivienda (incluidos los hogares de bajos ingresos altamente cargados de costos, los hogares que se han mudado dos o más veces en los últimos 60 días y los hogares que viven en un hotel / motel) Le recomendamos que comparta esta encuesta con sus colegas, partes interesadas y organizaciones asociadas. La encuesta debe tardar aproximadamente 10 minutos en completarse. Para obtener más información sobre el programa HOME-ARP del Condado de Contra Costa, visite el sitio web HOME-ARP http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/HOME-ARP o contáctenos al dcd.housing@dcd.cccounty.us o al (925) 655-2708. ¿Cómo está Ud. conectado con el Condado de Contra Costa? (Responda más de una vez si necesita) • Vivir • Trabajar • Desarrollador de viviendas asequibles • Empleado de Agencia Pública • Continuidad de la atención • Operación de servicios para personas sin hogar • Grupo de Veteranos • Vivienda Justa, Proveedor de Derechos Civiles • Autoridad de Vivienda Pública • Operación de servicios de violencia doméstica • Organización que atiende a personas que viven con impedimentos • Otro El mundo de la financiación federal viene con mucha jerga. A continuación se presentan las definiciones de los términos que se usan con frecuencia en relación con los fondos HOME-ARP y que se encuentran en esta encuesta. EN RIESGO DE FALTA DE VIVIENDA: Una persona o familia que tiene ingresos extremadamente bajos y se ha mudado por razones económicas dos o más veces durante los últimos 60 días, vive en el hogar de otro debido a dificultades económicas, ha sido notificado por escrito que su derecho a ocupar su vivienda actual o situación de vida se terminará dentro de los 21 días, vive en un hotel / motel y el costo del hotel / motel no es pagado por organizaciones caritativas u otro programa de subsidio, vive en un apartamento de ocupación o eficiencia de una sola habitación en el que residen más de dos personas, está saliendo de una institución o sistema de atención financiado con fondos públicos, o vive en una vivienda que tiene características asociadas con la inestabilidad. MAYOR RIESGO DE INESTABILIDAD DE LA VIVIENDA: Para los fondos HOME-ARP, esto significa un hogar que tiene ingresos extremadamente bajos (gana menos del 30% AMI) Y está experimentando una carga de costos severa (pagando más del 50% de los ingresos mensuales para los costos de vivienda); o es de bajos ingresos (gana entre 31-50% AMI) Y cumple con una de las condiciones de "riesgo de falta de vivienda". REFUGIO NO CONGREGADO: A diferencia de los entornos congregados, como los refugios tradicionales para personas sin hogar, el refugio no congregado ofrece más alojamiento privado (habitaciones individuales). POBLACIONES CALIFICADAS: Para los fondos HOME-ARP, esto significa personas sin hogar, en riesgo de quedarse sin hogar, huyendo de la violencia doméstica en el noviazgo, violencia sexual, acecho, trata de personas o de Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 73 | Page otra manera en alto riesgo de inestabilidad de vivienda. SERVICIOS DE APOYO: Los fondos de HOME-ARP se pueden usar para servicios para proporcionar una amplia gama de servicios de apoyo que incluyen cuidado de niños, servicios de educación, asistencia de empleo / capacitación laboral, alimentos, servicios de búsqueda de vivienda y asesoramiento, servicios legales, capacitación en habilidades para la vida, servicios de salud mental, administración de casos y transporte. ASISTENCIA DE ALQUILER BASADA EN EL INQUILINO: Un subsidio de alquiler para ayudar a los hogares a pagar los costos de la vivienda, como el alquiler y los depósitos de seguridad. "Basado en el inquilino" significa que el subsidio está adjunto al hogar, y pueden usarlo para alquilar cualquier unidad de alquiler que cumpla con las pautas del programa y cuyo propietario esté dispuesto a aceptar el pago del subsidio. 2. ¿Apoyaría el uso de los fondos HOME-ARP para la nueva construcción o rehabilitación de viviendas de alquiler asequibles permanentes? (Una sola respuesta) a. Sí b. No c. Inseguro 3. ¿Apoyaría el uso de fondos HOME-ARP para un proyecto de refugio no congregado? (Es uno o más edificios que albergan a individuos y familias y no les exige que firmen un contrato de arrendamiento) (Una sola respuesta) a. Sí b. No c. Inseguro 4. ¿Hay una necesidad para un programa de asistencia de alquiler basada en el inquilino en el condado de Contra Costa? (Una sola respuesta) a. Sí b. No c. Inseguro 5. Califique las siguientes actividades elegibles en orden de necesidad, siendo 1 la mayor necesidad y 4 la menos necesaria: a. Refugio no congregado b. Unidades de vivienda de alquiler asequible permanente c. Servicios de apoyo relacionados con la vivienda d. Asistencia de alquiler basada en el inquilino 6. Entre las siguientes poblaciones calificadas (consulte las definiciones anteriores para obtener más información sobre cada una) que son elegibles para el financiamiento HOME-ARP, ¿dónde se necesita más en el condado de Contra Costa? Clasifique lo siguiente, siendo 1 la mayor necesidad y 5 la menos necesaria: a. Actualmente sin hogar b. En riesgo de quedarse sin hogar c. Actualmente sin hogar Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 74 | Page d. Huir o intentar huir de la violencia doméstica, la violencia en el noviazgo, la agresión sexual, el acecho o la trata de personas e. Otras poblaciones donde la asistencia evitaría la falta de vivienda o serviría a aquellos con mayor riesgo de inestabilidad habitacional 7. En su opinión, ¿qué tan difícil es entrar en un refugio en el condado de Contra Costa? (Una sola respuesta) a. Extremadamente difícil b. Algo difícil c. Asi-asi d. Algo fácil e. Muy fácil f. No sé 8. Entre las personas en el Condado de Contra Costa que califican como un hogar de Población Calificada (consulte las Definiciones anteriores para obtener más información sobre cada una), identifique qué grupo enfrenta las mayores barreras para poner fin a su falta de vivienda. (Una sola respuesta) a. Juventud b. Personas mayores c. Personas con afecciones de salud mental o trastornos por abuso de sustancias d. Personas con impedimentos 9. ¿Qué necesidades o vacíos ve en la construcción, rehabilitación o adquisición de refugio no congregado en el condado de Contra Costa? 10. ¿Qué necesidades de vacíos ve en la producción o preservación de viviendas de alquiler asequibles permanentes en el Condado de Contra Costa? 11. ¿Qué necesidades o vacíos ve en los servicios de apoyo relacionados con la vivienda (servicios para asistir a personas quedan en sus casas) en el Condado de Contra Costa? 12. ¿Qué necesidades o vacíos de vivienda o servicio insatisfechas ve en la Asistencia de Alquiler Basada en Inquilinos en el Condado de Contra Costa? Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 75 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 76 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 77 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 78 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 79 | Page APPENDIX C – CITIZEN PARTICIPATION & PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 80 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 81 | Page Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 82 | Page Appendix D – Board of Supervisors Approval 9/20/2022 Contra Costa Consortium – HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 83 | Page Appendix E – Certifications & SF-424s RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing Committee and the Health Services Director on September 13, 2022, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) requires that evidence of Board of Supervisor approval must be contained within each Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) provider’s credentials file. Approval of this list of providers as recommended by the CCHP Medical Director will enable CCHP to comply with this requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, CCHP’s Providers would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with the NCQA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve New and Recredentialing Providers and Organizational Providers in Contra Costa Health Plan’s Community Provider Network ATTACHMENTS Sep 13 List Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC September 13 , 2022 CREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2022 Name Specialty Berry, Ashley, PsyD Mental Health Services Bertoni, Danielle, MD Surgery – General Carroll, Phyllis, NP Mid-Level Family Medicine Canning, Susan, MD Dermatology Castaneda, Elizabeth, AMFT Mental Health Services Dang, Minh Ngoc, MD Dermatology Hasan, Saqib, MD Surgery - Orthopaedic Hurtado, Jerry, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Kirkpatrick, Haley, DNP Mid-Level Orthopaedic Surgery Assistant Kjedlsen, Leigh, AUD Audiology Le, Kevin, BCBA M.Ed Qualified Autism Provider Ly, Jessica, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Merchant, Reema, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Mitchell-Castro, Jessica, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autism Provider Mottau, Breanna, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Muto-Isolani, Antonio, MD Wound Care Polcar, Taylor, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Siddiqui, Reema, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Soni, Surbhee BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Trapp, Charlisa, AMFT Mental Health Services Tremmel-Howell, Kelly, AUD Audiology CREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDERS SEPTEMBER 2022 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Diamond Ridge Post Acute LLC Skilled Nursing Facility Pittsburg Excell Health Care Center Skilled Nursing Facility Oakland First Aid Transportation LLC Non-emergency Transportation Oakland Premier Healthcare Services, LLC, dba: Aveanna Healthcare Private Duty Nursing Oakland Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC September 13, 2022 Page 2 of 2 RECREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2022 Name Specialty Abrahamson, Lauren, NP Mid-Level OB/GYN Akera, Chika, MD Primary Care Family Medicine AIta, Jenna, BCBA, M.Ed. Qualified Autism Provider Ally, Zahora, MD Radiation Oncology Bell, David, MD Orthopaedic Surgery/ Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Chen, Xiaochuan, MD Primary Care Internal Medicine Chentanez, Teera, MD Infectious Disease Cherry, Suraj, MD Ophthalmology Chow, David, MD Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation/ Pain Medicine Clark, Tyler, MD Surgery – Orthopaedic Cook, Laura, PT Physical Therapy Corbett, Kimberly, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Danielyan, Arman, MD Psychiatry/Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Dosanjh, Amarjit, MD Surgery – Plastic Eaglin, Olga, PA Primary Care Family Medicine Ejaz, Ehsan, PA Mid-Level Neurological Surgery Assistant Enz, Jose, MD Primary Care Pediatrician Fong, Karen, MD Otolaryngology Ford, Lloyd, MD Otolaryngology Fulkerson, Eric, MD Surgery – Orthopaedics Gengler, Cheyenne, OD Optometry Gilliland, Morgan, NP Primary Care Family Medicine Goodman, S uzan, MD Family Planning Halstenrud, Terri, PT Physical Therapy Henneberg, Christine, MD Family Planning Jimenez, Laura, PT Physical Therapy Kaur, Parveen, MD Primary Care Family Medicine Kenan, Joseph, MD Psychiatry Khashayar, Ramin, MD Pulmonary Disease Krier, Margaret, MFT Mental Health Services Kronick, John, MD Surgery – Orthopaedic Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by PRCC September 23, 2022 Page 3 of 3 RECREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2022 Name Specialty Mukhopadhyay, Suddha, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Nemes, Christopher, MD Psychiatry Nyamora, Cory, PsyD Mental Health Services Orden, Roy, MD Allergy & Immunology Patel, Nilam, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider Reinganum, Sara, MD Surgery – General Sayo, Legson, PT Physical Therapy Seaver, Margaret, MD Hematology/ Oncology Shalaby, Mostafa, MD Pulmonary Disease Sharma, Gauri, DO Hematology/ Oncology Sharma, Rishi, MD Gastroenterology Skarda, Stephen, DC Chiropractic Medicine Skille, Leif, MD Psychiatry Trevino, Vicki, PA Mid-Level Surgery – General/Mid- Level Wound Care Wang, Kathryn, DPT Physical Therapy Weir, Sierra, SLP Speech Pathology Wills, Robinson, DP T Physical Therapy Wood, Monica, MFT Mental Health Services Zheng, Yi, MD Gastroenterology RECREDENTIALING OR GANIZATION AL PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2022 Provider Name Provide the Fol lowing Services Location Continuum Care North Bay, LLC Hospice - Outpatient Petaluma Pleasant Hill Post Acute Skilled Nursing Facility Pleasant Hill Shields Nursing Centers, Inc. dba: Shields Nursing Center Skilled Nursing Facility El Cerrito Shields Nursing Centers, Inc. dba: Shields Richmond Nursing Center Skilled Nursing Facility Richmond bop l-September 13, 2 022 RECOMMENDATION(S): ALLOCATE $6,000 from the Livable Communities Trust (District II portion) to the Public Works Department for the construction of pedestrian signage at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Oakridge Lane in unincorporated Danville, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen. FISCAL IMPACT: No General Fund impact. This proposed action allocates $6,000 from the District II portion of the Livable Communities Trust Fund (Fund). The current balance in the District II portion of the Fund is $1,430,519.35 (this total does not reflect the proposed $6,000 allocation). BACKGROUND: The Livable Communities Trust Fund is a Special Revenue Mitigation Fund that was established by the Board of Supervisors on November 15, 2005, following the approval of the Camino Tassajara Combined General Plan Amendment Project, also known as the Alamo Creek and Intervening Property residential projects, and was required as a condition of approval. The Fund was established to implement the County’s Smart Growth Action Plan. The residential developers pay an $8,000 per unit fee (excluding the affordable housing portions of the projects) into the Fund. The Department of Conservation and Development administers the Fund. On December 3, 2013, the Board of Supervisors determined that revenue from the Fund should be spent equally among supervisorial districts. At complete build-out, deposits to the Fund will total $8,448,000. As of August 31, 2022, the account has collected $8,376,000 in revenue fees, and $893,886.74 accrued interest with $4,891,493.10 remaining in uncommitted funds. The approved expenditures to date are attached. The County Public Works Department intends to construct pedestrian signage as well as two flashing beacons at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Oakridge Lane in unincorporated Danville. The District II Supervisor supports allocating $6,000 of District II's portion of the Fund towards this project. The labor is expected to be completed by County Public Works Maintenance staff. The project supports goal five of the Smart Growth Action Plan to help fund transit and transportation improvements which foster smart growth principles. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The construction of pedestrian signage at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Oakridge Lane in unincorporated Danville supports outcome 5: Communities are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/11/2022 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristin Sherk 925-655-2889 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 11, 2022 Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Antonia Welty, Deputy cc: C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:October 11, 2022 Contra Costa County Subject:Allocation of Livable Communities Trust Funds to the Public Works Department (District II portion) for pedestrian signage in unincorporated Danville ATTACHMENTS LCT Project List Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects Project No.Board Date Grant Recipient Project Smart Growth Action Plan Goal District I District II District III District IV District V Total Expenditures* Remaining Balance 1,616,549$ 373,458$ 450,000$ 1,803,977$ 425,000$ 2,508,979.45$ 1,619,414.19$ 2022-11 10/4/2022 Mt. Diablo Unified Education 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 2022-10 10/4/2022 Choice in Aging Aging in Place Campus 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ -$ -$ 490,590$ -$ -$ 490,590$ 2022-09 9/20/2022 Monument Crisis Center Family Resource Center 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 2022-08 6/21/2022 City of Orinda Park Master Plan - Conceptual Design Update 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 2022-07 6/21/2022 The Lafayette Park Trust Lafayette Theater Project 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 2022-06 6/21/2022 Moraga Community Foundation Moraga Commons Enhancement 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 2022-05 5/10/2022 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2022/23 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 2022-04 5/10/2022 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2021/22 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 2022-03 5/10/2022 Clayton Community Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 2022-02 5/10/2022 Walnut Creek Library Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 2022-01 5/10/2022 Pleasant Hill Library Foundation Misc. Library Programs 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 2020-02 12/15/2020 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2020/21 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 2020-01 9/22/2020 Community HSG Dev. Corp. NR Heritage Point Commercial 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 505,336$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 505,336$ 2019-08 10/22/2019 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2019/20 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 2019-07 7/30/2019 DCD District V Code Enforcement 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 2019-06 7/30/2019 PWD PWD - Beautification Bay Point 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 2019-05 7/30/2019 Sheriff's Office Bay Point Resident Deputy Program 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ 2019-04 6/18/2019 Innovation Tri Valley 2040 Tri Valley Vision Plan Investment 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 2019-03 3/26/2019 RYSE Center RYSE Center Capital Expansion 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 51,174$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 51,174$ -$ 2019-02 3/26/2019 PWD RYSE Acq. - Phase 2 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 42,500$ -$ -$ -$ 42,500$ -$ 2019-01 1/15/2019 PWD Friends of the El Sobrante Library 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 15,045$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,045$ -$ 2018-07 12/18/2018 Choice in Aging Infrastructure Workforce Development 1. Clean up land for redevelopment and create jobs near existing housing.-$ -$ -$ 13,200$ -$ 13,200$ -$ 2018-06 12/4/2018 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2018/19 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 2018-05 6/12/2018 PWD RYSE Acq. - Phase 1 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ 2018-04 3/27/2018 Innovation Tri Valley Tri Valley Rising Report 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 2018-03 3/27/2018 PWD Newell Avenue Pathway 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ 2018-02 2/27/2018 H3 Contra Costa Housing Security Fund 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ 10,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ -$ 2018-01 1/16/2018 PWD SRV Street Smarts - 2017/18 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 2017-03 9/19/2017 Garden Park Apartments Community Garden Park Apartments 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 125,000$ -$ 2017-02 3/14/2017 Mobility Matters Rides for Veterans 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ 33,458$ -$ 50,187$ -$ 83,645$ -$ 2017-01 3/7/2017 Aglantis Agra Tech Solar Light Greenhouse 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ -$ 2016-03 12/20/2016 DCD Agriculture Policy Study 3. Innovative land use planning: mixed use & infill development -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 113,829.44$ 36,170.56$ 2016-02 12/20/2016 DCD Marsh Creek Trail 5. Fund transit & other transportation improvements which foster smart growth -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 247,092.37$ 2,907.63$ 2016-01 6/14/2016 CHDC Heritage Point Apartments 2. Construct, develop, or renovate affordable housing to meet regional housing goals 927,494$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 927,494$ -$ 2013-01 10/22/2013 DCD Northern Waterfront 4. Economic Revitalization in Urban Infill Communities 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000.00$ -$ 1,616,549$ 373,458$ 450,000$ 1,803,977$ 425,000$ 2,508,979.45$ 1,619,414.19$ * Reflects expenditures made by DCD, including payments to other County departments or non-profit organizations. Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects Rate of Expenditure 54% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Liveable Communities Trust Fund List of Projects 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 76% 99% 100% 100% 54%