HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01281986 - T.9 T.9
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on January 28, 1986 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson and Powers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment for Center Avenue, Pacheco area
This being the time for hearing the recommendation of the
Contra Costa County Planning Commission relating to consideration of
the Center Avenue General Plan Amendment to the County General Plan
pertaining to Land Use, Recreation and Circulation Elements. The
proposed amendment is from Multiple Family Residential Medium
Density to varying designations including Multiple Family
Residential Low, Medium or High Densities, Single Family Residential
High Density and Public and Semi-Public or other designations as
deemed appropriate, for approximately 42 acres of land bounded by the
Grayson Creek Flood Control channel on the east; westerly to Flame
Drive, south to the City of Pleasant Hill (Second Avenue) and north
to include lands that access on Center Avenue and the multiples
along Aspen Drive in the Pacheco area; and
Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Community
Development, described the site of the proposed general plan
amendment, and reviewed the proposal and the recommendations of the
staff and Planning Commission.
The Chair declared the hearing open and the following per-
sons appeared to speak:
Mrs. F. Myers, 113 First Avenue, South, Pacheco, a 45-year
resident, who stated that she was in favor the the development but is
anxious about traffic and parking in that area.
Chairman Powers requested the Community Development staff
to meet with Mrs. Myers and address her concerns.
Joyce Turner, Owner of property on Aspen and Center,
announced that she had a reciprocal agreement with the church to
park on her property on Sunday and she will park on their property
on weekdays, and there would be no parking on the street for this
project.
There being no one else desiring to speak, the public
hearing was closed.
Supervisor McPeak advised that she was prepared to support
the proposed amendment, but that she concurred with the Chair in
deferring decision for two weeks while staff met with the residents.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED THAT decision on the proposed
general plan amendment is DEFERRED to February 11, 1986 at 9 :00 a.m.
as a determination item, and the Community Development staff is
requested to meet with Mrs. Myers and the residents of the area.
I hereby certify that this is a true and carrectcopy of
an action taken snd entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: ,. .....
PHIL nA HELQR,Oerk of the Board
of Supe Isom and County Administrator
cc: Community Development By # Deputy
County Counsel
County Administrator