Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01211986 - 2.4 2, y THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on January 21 , 1986 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson and Powers NOES: None ABSENT : None ABSTAIN: None -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Bethel Island-Sandmound Slough Specific Plan Phil Batchelor, County Administrator, presented to the Board the report dated January 21, 1986 , from A.A. Dehaesus, Director of the Community Development Department recommending that the Board authorize the preparation of a Specific Plan for Bethel Island and Sandmound Slough subject to obtaining the necessary funding. It was noted that the estimated cost of preparing a Bethel Island-Sandmound Slough Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report is approximately $200 ,000.00. Mr. Dehaesus commented on funding options available to the County to recover the cost of preparing Specific Plans. A copy of Mr. Dehasus' report is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Community Development Director are APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Finance Committee is requested to review at its February 3, 1986 , meeting the financial issues as noted in the report. I hereby certify that thls is a true arad correct con:-^f an action taken and untered on dtie or 14-he Board of Supervisors on the data shown. ATTESTED; Januar 21 . 1986 PHIL_ BATCHELOR, Cleric of the Burd of Supervisors and County Adn, Inis°orator 0 By 0Deputy cc : Finance Committee Director of Community Development County Administrator r � -' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: Phil Batchelor DATE: January 21 , 1986 County Administrator ,,GGc FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus l/W SUBJECT: Bethel Island-Sandmound Slough Director of Community Development Specific Plan Recommendation: Authorize the preparation of a specific plan for Bethel Island and Sandmound Slough subject -to the obtaining of the necessary funding. The estimated cost of preparing a Bethel Island-Sandmound Slough Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report is approximately $200,000. Background I: The East County Area General Plan adopted in 1978 included a Bethel Island/Sand Mound Slough Community Plan (pages 23, 30, 31 ) and recommended in the implementation chapter (page 53) under additional implementation measures: "I . . Prepare a Specific Plan for Bethel Island to guide its future growth.". Since that time because of County budget limitations, the specific plan has not been prepared. Background II : However, the Community has remained active in pursuing the pre- paration of a Specific Plan and this activity has been monitored by the Community Development Department staff. These efforts are: 1 . Filipe Johansson , a private property owner, has financed the beginning of a specific plan by retaining the firms of Wisley & Ham and DWAW (Ec kbo, Dean, . Austin & Williams). Their efforts to .date have been primarily the outlining of a schedule, gathering of data and presiding over and attending public meet- ings in the Bethel Island area. : .Their proposals and reports have been reviewed by- Community Development .Staff and staff has made recommendations to insure that the Specific Plan, if. prepared by the consultants, would meet the County's standards as to .:imagination ,-. technical competence, and implementation (as established in the North. Orinda Specific Plan,- the Sycamore Valley Area Spe- cific Plan and the Pleasant Hill/BART Station Specific Plan. ) Department staff also attended many of the public meetings.. 2. In 1982, the Citizens 'Advisory Committee of CSD-15 (County Sanitation District 15) asked the Board of Supervisors acting as the Board -of Directors of San-i- tation.. District 15 to consider the use of special district augmentation funds to study water and sanitation problems and opportunities in the Bethel Island/ Sandmound Slough area. The County Administrator's office, Health Department, Environmental Control Division of the Public Works Department, and the Plan- ning Department reviewed the request and recommended in .September 1986 that funds in the amount of $50,000 to $100,000 be allocated for a study that could and would be an excellent information base for a Specific Plan. The funds were not allocated. A: h -4 ,...+ Phil Bathcelor -2- January. 21 , 1986 3. In. 1983/84, a Bethel Island Specific Plan Committee was appointed to oversee the efforts .of Wisley & Ham and €DAW. The Committee met regularly for a period .of time but stopped meeting when Mr. Johansson no longer financed the program. Community Development staff attended the early meetings of the Committee. 4. In June 1985 , a Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) met with the Bethel Islnad Community and prepared a report: "Bethel Island Area R/DAT Report, Community& Response" copies of which -have been given to the Board previously. This R/UDAT report was .financed by a grant from the San Francisco Foundation. The grant was used to pay R/UDAT team expenses such as food, lodging, film, etc. but not .salaries, since the team, a service of the American Institute of Architects , serves without pay. The R/UDAT. report recommended the preparation of a Specific Plan for Bethel Island. 5. Since that time, the County has received requests from a) Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District; b) Citizens Advisory Committee Sanitation District 15; . c) Board of Trustees, Reclamation District 799; d) Bethel Island Fire Department to have the specific plan for Bethel Island/Sandmound .Slough prepared for utilizing special district augmentation funds. Financing: Unlike General Plans , State law allows the County .to recover the cost of Specific Plans through developer fees or other building or application fees. If the augmentation funds were used, they could be recovered over time through this fee system. In addition, if an assessment district were formed, the fees could be included in the assessment as was done in the case of the Pleasant Hill/ BART station specific plan. It is our understanding that the Bethel Island Community has also asked the San Francisco Foundation for a grant to .pay for all or a part of the proposed Specific Plan program. We do not know, at this time, the results of this request. Another possibility is for the County to advance funds from the general fund with repayment through the Specific Plan fee or the San Francisco foundation grant if received. The Community Development Department recommends that the Board authorize the prepara- tion of a Specific Plan and allocate a "loan" .from one. of the available services to fund a significant part of the financing. This action will serve to leverage money from the other local funding sources available. In conclusion, we believe the Specific Plan is a very good idea and will help resolve many of the complicated planning and infrastructure issues surrounding development in the Bethel Island area. AAD:gg cc: County Counsel