Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10012013 - D.2RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Draft TriLink Feasibility Study Report and REQUEST comments from the Board of Supervisors for the final report, as recommended by Supervisor Piepho. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: TriLink (State Route 239) is a potential new high quality transportation facility that would connect State Route 4 near Brentwood to the Interstate 580/205 corridor near Tracy. Over the past 18 months, multiple local agencies, together with environmental and business advocates, have collaborated to study the feasibility of constructing the TriLink facilities. This work has culminated in a draft report which is now available for public review. The purpose of this presentation is to summarize the key findings for the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and to solicit comment. See attached presentation materials on the Draft TriLink Feasibility Study. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 10/01/2013 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Karyn Cornell, 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 1, 2013 David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Date:October 1, 2013 Contra Costa County Subject:Draft TriLink Feasibility Study Presentation CLERK'S ADDENDUM ACCEPTED the Draft TriLink Feasibility Study Report. The Board also requested that the report be referred to Public Works and Conservation & Development for additional feedback by no later than November 5, 2013. ATTACHMENTS Draft TriLink Feasibility Study Presentation 1 TriLink (SR 239) Feasibility Study Fall 2013 Agenda ƒWhat is TriLink? ƒWhat did we do? ƒWhat did we find? ƒWhere are we going? ƒComments and questions TriLink (SR 239) Feasibility Study 2 What is TriLink? ƒBackground ƒStudy Area ƒStudy Impetus ƒLegislatively-designated but unconstructed ƒMultimodal link from SR 4 near Brentwood to I-205 west of Tracy ƒRoute has not been adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) ƒContra Costa County awarded $14 million under SAFETEA-LU in 2005 ƒStudy administration transferred to CCTA in January 2012 Background What is TriLink? 3 Study Area What is TriLink? ƒImprove regional connectivity ƒSupport planned development and job realization ƒEnhance goods movement ƒImprove roadway safety ƒBenefit emergency response TriLink Study Impetus What is TriLink? 4 What did we do? ƒDefined Corridor Elements ƒBuilt Ten-County Traffic Model ƒMapped Environmental Considerations ƒDeveloped Potential Route Options ƒConsidered Green Design Applications ƒExamined Funding and Implementation Scenarios ƒEngaged Stakeholders ƒInvolved the Public Defined Five Corridor Elements What did we do? 5 SANTA CLARA ALAMEDA CONTRA COSTA SAN FRANCISCO SAN MATEO SAN JOAQUIN SONOMA SOLANO MARIN NAPA Built Ten-County Traffic Model Forecasts based on the use of the CCTA Ten-County Model (addition of San Joaquin) ƒLand use projections reflect P-2009, 2000-2040 incremental growth forecasts based upon ABAG and SJCOG, adjusted to reflect actual 2010 conditions. ƒNetwork assumptions based on most recently adopted RTP (T-2035)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Clifton Court Forebay What did we do? Mapped Environmental Considerations What did we do? 6 Planned Development What did we do? Prime Farmland What did we do? 7 Land Acquired for Conservation What did we do? Alkali Soils What did we do? 8 Vernal Pools What did we do? Byron Airport and Utility Infrastructure What did we do? 9 Wind Resource Area What did we do? Delta Protection Zone and Waterways What did we do? 10 Byron Hot Springs What did we do? Developed Potential Route Options Airport ConnectorAirport Connector North LinkNorth Link South LinkSouth Link I-580 LinkI-580 Link Transit Link Transit Link What did we do? 11 Considered Green Design Applications ƒEvaluate sustainability using the Envision Rating System, a framework for assessing community, environmental, and economic benefits of infrastructure projects ƒIncorporate innovative green design: solar road panels; recycled materials, EV charging stations, carbon sequestration. What did we do? ƒCoordinate with habitat conservation initiatives, including East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP, EACCS, and SJMSCP. Segment Costs Airport Connector $30 - 50 million South Link $80 - 120 million North Link $70 - 100 million I-580 Link $450 - 500 million Transit Varies by type Examined Implementation Scenarios – Preliminary Cost Estimates What did we do? 12 Examined Implementation Scenarios ƒEvaluated possible options for organizational structure, including: ¾Cooperative arrangements between existing authorities ¾Joint Powers Authority (JPA) ¾Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) ƒCompared project delivery methods, including: ¾Traditional publicly-funded approach ¾Innovative financing strategies (public-private partnerships, CTFA bonds, tolling) ¾Alternative delivery methods What did we do? Examined Implementation Scenarios – Available Source Funding Local Funds ($158.4 Billion) 65% State Funds ($53.1 Billion) 22% Federal Funds ($30.9 Billion) 13% ƒIdentified Projects ƒTriLink would be an expansion project estimated at $630 – $770 million 2011 – 2020 : $ 242.2 B What did we do? 13 ƒTransportation impact fee program ƒMeasure J reauthorization ƒTolling, user-fees and private financing ƒFunding initiatives (new) What did we do? Examined Implementation Scenarios – Potential Supplementary Sources Engaged Stakeholders ƒEngaged a wide range of stakeholders ¾Public officials from communities in the study area ¾Environmental and business advocates ¾Technical staff from State and local agencies ƒStakeholders reviewed TriLink traffic and job/housing projections ƒStakeholders contributed input that informed development of potential routes What did we do? 14 Involved the General Public Feasibility study involved a robust public outreach process ƒPublic open house meetings in Brentwood, Tracy, and Mountain House ƒOnline “virtual workshop” targeting people unable to attend in person ƒPrint and online in the Contra Costa Times, the Tracy Press, and other local media ƒTriLink website: www.trilink239.org What did we do? What did we find? ƒImprove Connectivity and Relieve Congestion ƒSupport Local Job Growth ƒEnhance Goods Movement ƒImprove Roadway Safety and Emergency Access ƒReduce VMT and GHG Emissions 15 Improve Connectivity and Relieve Congestion ƒWithout TriLink, peak hour traffic volumes are forecasted to exceed current roadway capacity ƒTriLink would divert traffic from existing roadways and ease congestion What did we find? Support Local Job Growth ƒCommunities in east Contra Costa and west San Joaquin counties have planned for job growth ƒThere are opportunities in the manufacturing, wholesale, and transportation sectors What did we find? ƒThese industries rely heavily on transportation infrastructure ƒTriLink would provide transportation connections needed to make job growth possible 16 Enhance Goods Movement TriLink would be an effective alternative for trips to east Contra Costa County and the northeast portion of the Bay Area ƒToday Byron Highway, Vasco Road, and SR-4 carry higher than normal volumes of truck traffic ƒTruck transport of agricultural produce and consumer goods will increase as Bay Area population grows ƒTriLink improvements would offer significant time savings – 16 minutes on an AM peak hour trip from Tracy to Martinez What did we find? Route: I-580/I-680 I-580 Link/SR-4 Miles 46 43 AM Peak Minutes 82 66 Improve Roadway Safety ƒSharp curves, narrow lanes, steep grades, lack of passing options, and high traffic volumes create safety concerns on study area roadways ƒTriLink will improve safety with ¾Left-turn bays to provide a refuge for turning vehicles ¾Medians to provide separation between the opposing lanes of traffic ¾Standard shoulder widths providing a buffer from roadside obstacles ¾Two travel lanes in each direction ¾Dedicated facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. What did we find? 17 Improve Emergency Access ƒMountain House, Knightsen, Discovery Bay, Oakley, and Antioch are all in flood-prone areas ƒTriLink could serve as an emergency evacuation route in the event of a natural disaster ƒTriLink would also be a route into the area for response and recovery assistance. What did we find? Reduce VMT and GHG Emissions ƒOverall VMT reductions of 3.4% ƒDaily VMT decreases by ~ 4 million miles ƒAnnual CO2 decreases by ~ 400,000 metric tons ƒAnnual fuel savings of over 40 million gallons (over $160 million/year) ƒAnnual vehicle hours of delay (VHD) decreases by 57% VMT and GHG modeling indicate that a ‘2040 with TriLink Scenario’ would result in: What did we find? 18 Where are we going? ƒFeasibility Study Review and Approval ƒImplementation Steps ƒNext Steps ƒPresent Draft Feasibility Study to Study Area Councils and Boards in September and October 2013 ƒPrepare Final Feasibility Study ƒPresent Final Feasibility Study to PAC for approval in November 2013 Feasibility Study Review and Approval Where are we going? 19 Where are we going? Implementation Steps 2014 2016 2018 2024 Planning / Feasibility Project Initiation Documents Preliminary Engineering Proj. Approval / Environmental Doc Program Environmental Clearance / Route Adoption Final Design Construction Right-of-Way / Utilities Next Steps ƒAdvance project development ƒIdentify funding opportunities ƒEvaluate phasing options ƒDevelop implementation plan Where are we going? 20 Comments and Questions