HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08062013 - C.05RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2013/326 approving the sixth extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision
MS 00-00003, for a project being developed by Gene R. Schmidt, as recommended by the Public Works Director,
Alamo area. (District II)
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Subdivision Agreement needs to be renewed as the improvements are not completed yet. (Approximately 0% of
the work has been completed to date.) The developer has requested additional time to complete improvements.
Granting an extension gives the developer an additional year to complete the improvements and keeps the bonding
current.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Subdivision Agreement will not be renewed if the extension is not
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 08/06/2013 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: J. LaRocque, (925)
313-2315
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: August 6, 2013
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Design/Construction, Engineering Services, J. Capozzo, DCD, T – July 10, 2014, Gene R. Schmidt 940 Reliez Station Lane Lafayette, CA 94549,
Developers Surety & Indemnity Co. 2999 Oak Rd, Ste 420 Walnut Creek, CA 94597
C. 5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:August 6, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Approving the sixth extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS 00-00003, Alamo area.
(District II)
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: (CONT'D)
granted; the developer cannot complete the improvements; the bonds cannot be kept current; and, the County may
need to foreclose on the developer’s bonds and complete the improvements.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2013/326
Sixth Agreement Extension