HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02262013 - SD.7RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT report on the proposed Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative.1.
AUTHORIZE the Department of Conservation and Development to undertake activities associated with the
proposed Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative in collaboration with a broad spectrum of
stakeholders, including but not limited to federal, state, and regional agencies, the cities and special districts
located along the waterfront, and the industrial/commercial, railroad and maritime transportation interests
located along the waterfront.
2.
ESTABLISH the Board’s Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee with oversight responsibility for
the Department’s activities under the 2013 Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative.
3.
DIRECT the Conservation and Development Director to formulate and forward a detailed work program and
timeline for the 2013 Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative to the Transportation Water and
Infrastructure Committee, which would include:
4.
Survey key stakeholders within the Northern Waterfront area, including businesses, industrial plants,
transportation service providers, and public agencies, to understand the current and emerging trends and issues
affecting waterfront development (e.g. adaptation to sea level rise, maritime improvements, etc.) and to identify
their needs in relation to waterfront development.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 02/26/2013 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Patrick Roche,
(925-952-4739)
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: February 26, 2013
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
SD. 7
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development
Date:February 26, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative
RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
Inventory and map the industrial and commercial lands within the Northern Waterfront area, and the maritime and landside
transportation facilities that serve the waterfront.
Prepare an opportunities and constraints analysis related to the Northern Waterfront Area’s access, infrastructure, and
utilities to assess current and future needs in support of waterfront development.
Compile the stakeholders survey, the inventory and mapping of land and facilities, and the opportunities/constraints analysis
into a report to the Board of Supervisors assessing the economic development prospects along the Northern Waterfront.
Convene a public forum on Northern Waterfront Economic Development.
Based on the Northern Waterfront economic development assessment report and the public forum, prepare a Strategic Plan
on Northern Waterfront Economic Development for the Board of Supervisors consideration and adoption by the end of
calendar year 2013.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Much of the costs in staff time and material for the Department of Conservation and Development’s work activities
associated with the 2013 Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative can be absorbed under the department's
existing budget and supplemented with funding that might be secured from other sources. The department will pursue grant
funding and other funding mechanisms.
BACKGROUND:
At the January 29, 2013 Board of Supervisors Special Meeting, the Board received a presentation from the Workforce
Development Board, Contra Costa Community College District, Contra Costa Council, and the Department of Conservation
and Development on economic and workforce development in Contra Costa County. As a follow-up to the presentation, the
Board requested that the Conservation and Development Director return with a report on an economic development initiative
for the northern waterfront. The purpose of this report is to outline a recommended approach for a new Board initiative aimed
at promoting economic development along County’s working waterfront.
Contra Costa County’s waterfront is a 92-mile long shoreline stretching from the City of Richmond to the City of Oakley. It is
comprised of the shoreline along the San Francisco Bay (Richmond), San Pablo Bay (North Richmond, Pinole, Hercules,
Rodeo), Carquinez Strait (Crockett, Port Costa, and Martinez), Suisun Bay (Clyde), and the Sacramento River (Bay Point,
Pittsburg, Antioch, and Oakley). See attached map which shows the general location and boundary of the waterfront along
Bay/River shoreline. There is a varied mix of industrial, public, parkland, recreational, habitat/open space, and residential uses
located along the immediate shoreline in both the incorporated city limits and the unincorporated area. The following table
provides a breakdown of the mix of land uses along the waterfront:
CCC General Plan
Land Use Designation
Use
Description
%
Shoreline
Residential single or multiple family residential, or mixed use 6%
Commercial Recreation
(CR)
privately owned marinas, boat harbors 7%
Delta Recreation (DR)privately owned marina, boat harbor adjacent to Antioch Bridge 1%
Heavy Industry (HI)land set aside for oil refineries, chemical manufacturing, or other
industrial plants, including buffer area
8%
Public/Semi-Public (PS)military installations (including buffer area), other publicly owned
facilities, and railroads
13%
Park & Recreation (PR)primarily lands owned by East Bay Regional Park District, or other
public parks
31%
Open Space (OS)biologically sensitive lands or protected marsh lands, wetlands, and
wildlife habitat
30%
For the purposes of this report the “working waterfront” is defined as land along the shoreline devoted to industrial,
commercial, railroad, and maritime uses or activities. In the unincorporated area, the “working waterfront” is mostly
comprised of the industrial uses located along the shoreline in the communities of Rodeo, Crockett, Bay Point, and
unincorporated areas of Martinez and Antioch. These industrial uses have had a long tenure and are predominantly related to
the petroleum/chemical manufacturing industries. This is also generally the case for the shoreline within the incorporated city
limits with the exception of the City of Richmond where a large port complex occupies much of their working waterfront.
Additionally, the Military Ocean Terminal Concord (formerly the Concord Naval Weapons Station) an important military
trans-ocean shipping installation operated by the U.S. Army occupies a significant portion of the County’s shoreline along the
Suisun Bay.
What is noteworthy about Contra Costa County’s shoreline is the extent to which it is now occupied by parkland and open
space/habitat uses (see CCC General Plan Land Use table above). These uses would not be considered part of the “working
waterfront” as defined in this report.
Industrial development in Contra Costa County historically began along the waterfront and this explains why several
industrial facilities have had a long tenure here in Contra Costa County dating back to the early 1900’s (e.g. the four oil
refineries in the County were established between1900-1920). Contra Costa County’s “working waterfront” is more than an
historic artifact, it is still a vital part of the region’s economy. The continued vitality and future economic prospects of the
waterfront are important to anyone concerned about economic development in Contra Costa County. However, as the working
waterfront matures and the region’s economy evolves, it is in the County’s interest to gain a better understanding and insight
about the waterfront’s future and strategically plan for that future.
To that end, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Northern Waterfront Economic Development
Initiative that would involve sponsoring a multi-stakeholder forum on the future of the County’s waterfront and culminate in
the preparation of a Strategic Plan for Northern Waterfront Economic Development by the end of the calendar year. This
forum would focus on a range of maritime and landside transportation and economic development matters affecting the
waterfront. The purpose of the forum would be to gather the various stakeholder interests along the waterfront from both the
private and public sectors that are concerned with its economic future; wherein, the stakeholders could share information and
exchange ideas about the emerging trends and issues affecting the waterfront with a specific focus on how maritime and
landside transportation influences the waterfront’s current and future economic prospects. The forum is premised on the
notion that the waterfront is a vital part of the County’s, and for that matter, the region’s economy, that maritime and landside
transportation and economic development along the waterfront are linked and inter-related, and therefore, that broad
participation and coordination is needed to advance and improve the waterfront’s economic prospects. It is anticipated that this
forum will result in:
An understanding or agreement among the many stakeholders (public and private) along the waterfront to cooperate and
work collaboratively on maritime/landside transportation matters that would promote or provide economic benefits to
the waterfront; and/or,
Establish a regional approach by the county, cities, special district, other public agencies, and the private sector to, in
general, foster economic development along the waterfront, and more specifically, to formulate on overall strategic
economic vision for the waterfront - one that takes advantage of the waterfront’s existing maritime and landside
transportation assets; and/or,
Establish an inter-agency staff working group for the waterfront, comprised of city, county, special district, and other
public agency staff, to coordinate on maritime and landside transportation matters, and other related matters affecting
waterfront development (e.g. interagency coordination and planning for sea-level rise resiliency and adaption of vital
public infrastructure serving the waterfront), to enhance and improve the waterfront’s maritime and landside
transportation assets, and, to foster innovative economic development strategies/approaches that would provide benefit
to the waterfront, particularly in the absence of redevelopment or dwindling economic development assistance
programs.
If this initial forum on the waterfront is considered successful, and there is desire and interest in continuing the dialogue about
the future of the waterfront, then the Board could consider sponsoring an annual waterfront forum (similar to the annual
Contra Costa Watershed Forum, but different in scope and purpose).
As a final matter, should the Board authorize the Department to undertake the Northern Waterfront Economic Development
Initiative, staff recommends the Board establish the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee (TWIC) with
oversight responsibility and progress reports to the Board could be provided through TWIC. Staff is prepared to submit a
more detailed work program to the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee at their March 7, 2013 meeting that
elaborates on next steps and provides timeline to convene the Board-sponsored waterfront forum.
elaborates on next steps and provides timeline to convene the Board-sponsored waterfront forum.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without Board authorization the Department of Conservation and Development would not undertake activities for the 2013
Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative as described in this report.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not Applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Northern Waterfront Area
p
p
p
Port of Oakland
Port of Richmond
Port of Benecia
Carquinez Straight S a c ra m entoRiver§¨¦80
§¨¦680
§¨¦80
§¨¦680
}þ242
SFO
Richmond
Antioch
Concord Oakley
Danville
Hercules PittsburgPinole
Orinda
San Ramon
Martinez
Lafayette
Walnut Creek Brentwood
Moraga
Clayton
Pleasant HillEl Cerrito
San Pablo
San Ramon
BYRON AIRPORT
BUCHANAN AIR FIELD
METROPOLITAN OAKLAND INTL
§¨¦80
§¨¦780
§¨¦580
}þ4}þ4
}þ37
}þ24
}þ12
}þ13
§¨¦80 567J4
§¨¦580
§¨¦680
§¨¦280
§¨¦205
§¨¦980
}þ4
}þ4
Northern Waterfront Area
San Pablo Bay
San FranciscoBay
SuisunBay
To SacramentoState Capital
To Interstate 5Primary Trucking Route
International TradeRoute
To Port ofStockton
Route 4Widening
Hwy 4Bypass
Hwy 239 Study Area
MOTCO
UP RR
B N S F R R
U
P R
R
BNSF RR
Agricultural Lands
Urban Uses
Open Space and Watershed
Parks and Recreation
Industrial Lands
Shipping Channel
0 6 123Miles µMap created 02/06/2013 by Contra Costa CountyDepartment of Conservation and Development, GIS Group651 Pine Street, 4th Floor North Wing, Martinez, CA 94553-009537:59:48.455N 122:06:35.384W