HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02262013 - C.94RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. ADOPT Resolution 2013/118, approving an administrative budget and the draft Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule 13/14A (ROPS 13/14A) for the period of July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013, both of which are attached as
Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively;
2. FIND that the ROPS is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA
Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and
3. DIRECT the Director of Conservation and Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk and
pay the filing fee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None to the General Fund. Since dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, tax increment is now deposited in the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) which is administered
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 02/26/2013 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Maureen Toms,
925-674-7878
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: February 26, 2013
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 94
To:Successor to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency
From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development
Date:February 26, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Report on Successor Agency Administrative Budget and Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for July -
December 2013
FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D)
by the County Auditor Controller. Distributions are made semi-annually from the RPTTF by the County Auditor
Controller to the Successor Agency to fund the Successor Agency's administrative budget and ROPS. These funds
are distinct and separate from other funds used by the Department of Conservation and Development According to
state law, any obligation of the Successor Agency that cannot be funded by the RPTTF would not be an obligation
of the County.
BACKGROUND:
Administrative Budget
According to Health & Safety Code Section 34177 of AB x1 26 (the “Dissolution Act”), the Successor Agency
prepares a draft administrative budget and submits it to the Oversight Board for approval. Prior to the Oversight
Board’s approval of the administrative budget, the Board of Supervisors, acting in the capacity as the governing
board of the Successor Agency for the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, should review the proposed
administrative budget.
This budget (see Exhibit A) covers the first six-month period of Fiscal Year 13/14 beginning on July 1, 2013 and
ending December 31, 2013. The state statute specifies an allowance to the Successor Agency for its administrative
costs, using a percentage of property tax revenue allocated by the County Auditor Controller to the Successor
Agency to meet enforceable obligations. The distribution from the County Auditor Controller is made based on
three percent of the distribution to be received from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds (RPTTF) or
$250,000 for the fiscal year, whichever amount is greater. The County Auditor Controller has indicated that all
Successor Agencies will be receiving the minimum amount of $250,000 for RPTTF distribution in June. In the
RPTTF distribution in December, the County Auditor Controller will distribution a supplemental administrative
allowance in cases where a three percent of a Successor Agency's RPTTF distribution for the fiscal year is greater
than $250,000.
For Fiscal Year 12/13, the Successor Agency received at total administrative allowance of $345,331. The
Successor Agency estimates that its distribution from the RPTTF for Fiscal Year 13/14 will be similar to the prior
year, and is assuming its administrative allowance for Fiscal Year 13/14 will be $345,000. Some Successor
Agency staff costs will be project-related and will be charged to non-administrative enforceable obligations (e.g.
management of construction projects) shown on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. These
non-administrative and project management costs are estimated to contribute $210,000 in revenue for the
administrative budget in Fiscal Year 13/14.
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 13/14A
The State Department of Finance (DOF) has implemented a new naming convention for Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedules prepared for each six-month spending period. The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
for the July 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 time period is the fourth one prepared by the Successor Agency.
Instead of referring to this Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule as “ROPS 4”, the DOF will be using the
naming convention “ROPS 13/14 A”. This naming convention allows the DOF to determine which the six-month
period of the fiscal year covered by the ROPS. ROPS 13/14 A is the first half of Fiscal Year 13/14 and ROPS
13/14 B will be the second half of the Fiscal Year 13/14. The ROPS for July1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 will be
referred to as “ROPS 14/15 A”.
Adoption of Resolution No. 2013/118 includes adoption of ROPS 13/14A, which is included as Exhibit B to the
report. After adoption by the Successor Agency, ROPS 13/14A will be submitted to the Successor Agency's
Oversight Board for approval. The Oversight Board is scheduled to meet on February 27, 2013. Once approved
by the Oversight Board, ROPS 13/14A will be submitted to the State Controller's Office, the State Department of
Finance (DOF) and the Contra Costa County Auditor-Controller and will be posted on the Successor Agency's
website. The deadline for submitting ROPS 13/14A is March 1, 2013.
AB 1484, the Dissolution Act "clean-up" legislation, became law on June 27, 2012. It provides a 45-day review
period for the DOF once the Oversight Board has approved the ROPS. Within five days of the DOF decision on a
ROPS, a Successor Agency may request a meet and confer with the DOF to discuss disputed items.
ROPS 13/14A authorizes all payments to be made by the Successor Agency for enforceable obligations for the
six-month time period shown. The monthly payments noted on the ROPS are estimates. In most cases,
assumptions made for the ROPS 13/14A were based on actual expenditures in the prior ROPS and expected
expenditures in the Third ROPS. If all the expenditures estimated in the previous ROPS are not made for a line
item, the ROPS 13/14A will not show a payment amount for that line item but instead refer to the amount shown
in the prior ROPS.
Due to some new requirements in AB 1484, the Successor Agency was required to make a $2.2 million payment
to the County Auditor Controller from its reserve, which created a negative balance in its reserve fund. To resolve
this deficit, several obligations listed in the previous ROPS as coming from reserves are now relisted as funded by
the RPTTF.
The title page of ROPS 13/14A shows enforceable obligations funded with the RPTTF amount to $8,282,673.
This page also shows the anticipated distribution from the RPTTF to be $5,587,000 for this time period. This
amount assumes distribution in the RPTTF has already been set aside for pass-through payments to taxing entities
and for the County Auditor Controller administrative costs. In cases where the Auditor Controller determines that
RPTTF revenue is not sufficient to meet ROPS obligations, the Auditor Controller will make distributions from
the RPTTF according to the priorities established by the Dissolution Act. These priorities are as follows: 1) tax
allocation bond debt service payments, 2) pass thru payments, 3) other ROPS obligations, and 4) administrative
allowance. In a case where there is residual RPTTF after payment of these priorities, this residual revenue would
be distributed to the taxing entities of the former project area based on their tax rates for the area. AB 1484 also
provides that half of these residual distribution can be used by the Successor Agency to repay the County for the
loan the County made to the former Redevelopment Agency.
The Successor Agency anticipates it will file a notice of insufficient funds with the County Auditor Controller for
ROPS 13/14A, as was the case for the prior ROPS. As a result, the Successor Agency will need to defer payment
on some of its enforceable obligations to ROPS 13/14B.
Environmental Review
The actions set forth in Resolution 2013/118, as summarized above, are exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the
Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act (the "CEQA") in that it can be seen with a certainty that
the actions will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. The actions are required to continue a
governmental funding mechanism for financial obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency and to perform
the statutorily mandated unwinding of the assets, liabilities, and functions of the former Redevelopment Agency
pursuant to the Dissolution Act. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk in accordance with the
CEQA guidelines.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Failure to adopt the resolution would require the Board to consider other options for providing and funding staff
support for the Successor Agency. Without approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the
period of July through December 2013, the County Auditor-Controller would not be able to allocate funds to the
Successor Agency for staffing services and payment of recognized obligations during this six-month period.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not Applicable
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
By unanimous vote with all Supervisors present, Waived the 96-hour time limit in Section 25-2.206 of the
By unanimous vote with all Supervisors present, Waived the 96-hour time limit in Section 25-2.206 of the
County code and accepted the additional staff material (attached) as part of the subject agenda item.
ADOPTED Resolution 2013/118, approving an administrative budget and the draft Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule 13/14A (ROPS 13/14A) for the period of July 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013; FOUND that the
ROPS is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section
15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and DIRECTED the Director of Conservation and Development to file a
Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk and pay the filing fee.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2013/118
Exhibit A
ROPS 13/14A
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT
30 Muir Road
Martinez, CA 94553-1229
Telephone: (925) 674- Fax: (925) 674-7250
TO: Members, Board of Supervisors
FROM: Steven L. Goetz, Deputy Director – Transportation, Conservation and
Redevelopment Programs
DATE: February 2, 2013
SUBJECT: Agenda Item C.94, February 26, 2013 Board of Supervisors Meeting, Request to
Waive Better Government Ordinance 96-Hour Time Limit on Staff Material
Recommendation:
Waive the 96-hour time limit in Section 25-2.206 of the County code and accept the attached
staff material as part of the subject agenda item
.
Background:
The Better Government Ordinance requires that staff material be provided 96 hours before the
scheduled Board meeting (Section 25-2.206 of the County Code). The ordinance allows the
Board, by a three-fourths vote, to waive this time limit when, in its judgment, it is essential to do
so, providing that the County Administrator, appropriate department head or staff member
furnishes to the Board a written explanation as to why the material could not be provided to the
Board and the general public within 96-hour time limit.
Agenda item C.94 was prepared on February 20, 2013 and provides a recommendation
concerning the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the July to December 2013 time
period (ROPS 13/14A). On February 21, 2013, Successor Agency comments from Successor
Agency Counsel that a column entitled “Total due During Fiscal Year 2013-14”, was not
completed correctly, as it only included amounts for the first six months of the fiscal year. Since
this column only references 12-month totals, it does not affect the distribution being requested
from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund for ROPS 13/14A, which only covers the first
six months of the fiscal year, and it does not affect the text in the Board Order or Resolution
2013/118.
Successor Agency staff has included additional material attached to this memorandum which
consists of a Revised ROPS 13/14A. This additional material has been compared to the original
attachment to Item C.94. All items that have changed in the additional material have been
highlighted in yellow. This additional material has been included in Agenda Quick
By waiving the time limits of the Better Government Ordinance, the Board can consider this
additional information as part of its decision on Item C.94.
G:\CDBG-REDEV\Successor Agency\BOS\BGO memo item C94.doc
SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
Fiscal Year 13/14
line Amount
Admin/Non Admin Staff Expenses
Space Rent 50 $36,000
Salary/Overhead 51 $298,748
Various Admin Expenses 47 $220,252
TOTAL ADMIN EXPENSES $555,000
Revenue
Administrative Cost Allowance $345,000
EO (Non Admin + Project Mgmt) $210,000
TOTAL ADMIN REVENUES $555,000
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0
Project Management EO
CC Centre Bond Project 22 $20,000
Rodeo Bond Project 24 $40,000
IHT/Hookston Remediation 84 $50,000
IHT Properties 87 $10,000
Transit Village Project Management 89 $30,000
Tri City Redmediation 92 $20,000
N. Richmond Bond Project 103 $40,000
$210,000