HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02052013 - C.81RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the 2012 Annual Report from the Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials Commission as recommended
by the Health Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
On June 18, 2002, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2002/377, which requires that each regular and
ongoing board, commission, or committee report annually to the Board of Supervisors. The attached report presented
for Board consideration fulfills this requirement.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The annual reporting requirement to the Board of Supervisors would not be fulfilled.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not applicable.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 02/05/2013 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF
SUPERVISORS
Contact: Randy
Sawyer
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: February 5, 2013
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
C. 81
To:Board of Supervisors
From:William Walker, M.D.
Date:February 5, 2013
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Hazardous Materials Commission 2012 Annual Report
ATTACHMENTS
Report
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
Advisory Body Name: Hazardous Materials Commission
Advisory Body Meeting Time/Location: Fourth Thursday of every months, 4-6 pm, 2477 Arnold
Industrial Way, Concord
Chair: George Smith, Environmental Engineer Seat
Staff: Michael Kent, Contra Costa Health Services
Reporting Period: January-December, 2012
ACTIVITIES
• Gave a presentation to the Contra Costa Pharmaceutical Association on unused pharmaceutical
collection education.
• Collaborated with the Environmental Health Department and the Contra Costa Pharmaceutical
Association to develop educational materials about the proper disposal of unused
pharmaceuticals.
• Received a presentation on the PG&E clean-up of Shell Pond in Bay Point.
• Received a presentation from Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory on the environmental and health
impacts of nanotechnology.
• Provided input to the Department of Toxic Substances Control about possible ways to
summarize and present data on contaminated site 5-year reviews.
• Provided input on the County’s Hazardous Waste Notification Policy.
• Tracked adoption of Alameda County’s Unused Pharmaceutical Disposal Ordinance.
• Provided input into the development of satellite Household Hazardous Waste collection centers.
• Received a presentation on the State’s Green Chemistry Program.
• Reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Report for the WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure
project for Environmental Justice considerations.
• Received a presentation on ways to address Environmental Justice Considerations in the
California Environmental Quality Act.
• Received a presentation on the follow-up investigation of the August 6 Chevron fire.
• Provided feedback to the Office of the Sheriff on the use of the Community Warning System
during the August 6 Chevron fire.
• Provided three representatives to the Ad-Hoc Board of Supervisors committee selecting a new
vendor for the Telephone Emergency Notification System.
• Met individually with four County Supervisors.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The Commission followed-up their brownfield report recommendation, accepted by the Board of
Supervisors, that the Board write a letter to DTSC requesting changes to the Envirostor Database. They
provided input into the design of information that DTSC developed to summarize the dates of the 5-year
reviews of contaminated sites occurring within the County during the year. The Commission followed
up the HHW report by giving a presentation to the Contra Costa Pharmaceutical Association, and
getting them to agree to work with the Commission to develop educational materials for the customers
about the proper disposal of unused pharmaceuticals. The Commission is having a substantial impact of
the selection of the County’s TENS vendor by having three of its members be selected to be on the
Board of Supervisors Ad Hoc committee that is reviewing the applications. The Commission continued
to meet with each Supervisor one-on-one this year by meeting with four of the Supervisors. Finally, the
Commission continued to educate themselves on a range of emerging issues related to Hazardous
Materials by receiving in-depth presentations by outside experts on four topics.
ATTENDANCE/REPRESENTATION
The 13-member Commission has members from organized labor, environmental groups, industry, cities,
environmental engineering firms, and the public at large. The Commission has membership from all
regions of the County. All seats on the Commission were occupied this year, however one seat was
vacant for the first 5 months of the year. The Commission held 8 meetings this year, as well as 9
meetings of the Operations subcommittee and 6 meetings of the Planning and Policy Development
subcommittee. However, one meeting had to be cancelled due to a lack of a quorum. The Commission
meetings averaged of 9 of the 13 members or their alternates being present.
TRAINING/CERTIFICATION
No training or certification was provided or conducted.
PROPOSED WORK PLAN/OBJECTIVES FOR THIS YEAR
This year the Commission intends to continue to develop recommendations concerning unused
pharmaceutical collection education and work to implement these recommendations; continue to
investigate possible policy recommendations concerning addressing Environmental Justice
considerations in CEQA; continue to investigate possible policy recommendations concerning
nanotechnology; and continue to provide input into the selection of the County’s TENS vendor.