HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09301986 - 2.1 (2) 8.
H
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1986
SUBJECT: STATUS OF SOLID WASTE ACTIVITY IN THE COUNTY
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. ACCEPT the status reports of the County Administrator and the Community
Development Department.
2. DIRECT staff to meet with Mayors Conference to determine if there is a
desire to amend the Solid Waste Management Plan with respect to public
ownership of sanitary landfills.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No direct or immediate impact. Solid waste planning is financed by a
surcharge on landfill tipping fee. Public entry into sanitary landfill
ownership would require development of a new financial program.
REASONS FOR RECONP ENDATION/BACKGROUND
The September 1.7 , 1986 memo to the Board of Supervisors from the Director
of Community Development "Status Report on Three Privately-Proposed Land-
fill Applications" ; the status of the Acme Corps of Engineers permit
including legal actions, contingency disposal plans, and BCDC Bay Plan
revision; the activities of Delta Diablo Sanitation District, as verbally
summarized by the County Administrator and Community Development Department
staff were heard by the Board.
It was noted that the Solid Waste Management Plan, as supported by the
Board, recognized that the sanitary waste industry had been afforded first
opportunity to provide new sanitary landfill site( s) , and that the activi-
ties of various public entities suggested and implied an interest in
entering the landfill site business.
Additionally, the Board was aware that revision of the Solid Waste Manage-
ment Plan had been ordered by the California Waste Management Board.
Accordingly, the Board felt that the Mayors Conference would be an appro-
priate body to obtain an early informal expression of the cities ' thinking
on this question of public or private ownership and operation of sanitary
landfill( s) .
Continued on attachment: X yes Signature:
Recommend of County Administrator Recommend of Board Committee
Approve Other
Signature(s)
Action of Board on: J_t_j, O &Approved as Recommended Other
The status report of the County Administrator was an oral report.
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
/ AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
t/ Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain- /
Attested --20
Orig.Div. : Community Development PjftL BATCHELOR
cc: Community Development CLERK OF THE BOARD AND
Public Works COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Administrator
By
DEPUTY CL
_002
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Sept. 17, 1986
TO: Board of Supervisors Fi e: R-25H
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon, Director, Communi De op nt
SUBJECT: STATUREPORT ON THREE PRIVATELY-P S
S, E
LANDFILL APPLICATIONS
This memo is to. provide a status report on the three
privately-proposed sanitary landfill applications now being considered
by the County Planning Commission. This report was requested by the
Board at the September 9, 1986 meeting.
County Planning Commission Process
The County Planning Commission is responsible for certification of the
Environmental Impact Reports for the three applications, and acting on
the land use entitlements for the projects. All three applications
require a land use permit and a General Plan Amendment. The Kirker
Pass and Cental Landfill applications also require rezoning and
cancellation of Agricultural Preserve Contracts. These entitlements
must also be acted upon by the Board of Supervisors if approved by the
County Planning Commission. If the entitlements are denied by the
County Planning Commission, they are appealable to the Board of
Supervisors. The County Planning Commission may act upon all three
applications concurrently.
The Kirker Pass Waste Management Landfill EIR has been certified. A
hearing on the land use entitlements was held and continued to Septem-
ber 30.
The Central Landfill EIR is awaiting certification. The response
.document has been circulated and it is expected that the County
Planning Commission will act on the certification at their September
23 meeting. A hearing was held on the land use entitlements and was
continued to September 23 , 1986.
The East Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill EIR is in the process of being
completed. The comment period has closed and the response document is
awaiting completion. The County is discussing with the applicant
additional funding for completion of the response document. Once
additional funding is received, a contract amendment for the EIR
consultant can be negotiated and the response document can be complet-
ed. A public hearing on the land use entitlements has been held and
will be continued until more progress is made on the response document
for the EIR.
Solid Waste Commission Process
Each of the three proposed applications will require an amendment to
the County Solid .Waste Management Plan. This amendment must be
STATUS REPORT ON THREE PRIVATELY- -2- Sept. 16, 1986
PROPOSED LANDFILL APPLICATIONS
approved by the Board of Supervisors, a majority of the cities con-
taining a majority of the incorporated population, and the California
Waste Management Board. The Kirker Pass Landfill has requested a
Solid Waste Plan Amendment. The Board of Supervisors referred this
request to the Solid Waste Commission for recommendation. The other
two applications have not yet submitted amendment applications, but
are expected to do so shortly. In preparation for amending the County
Solid Waste Management Plan for the three landfill sites, the Solid
Waste Commission has been actively preparing solid waste policies to
guide County decision-making on landfills and other solid waste
matters. A joint study session between the Solid Waste Commission and
the County Planning Commission was held on September 9, and another
meeting is scheduled for October 15. The Solid Waste Commission is
expected to act concurrently with the County Planning Commission in
its recommendation to the Board on a County Solid Waste Management
Plan Amendment for all three sites.
Future Actions
The Community Development Department does not have a recommendation on
the three applications at this time. Since there have been many
questions raised about proposed mitigation measures and conditions for
the land use permit, staff is compiling a preliminary draft of condi-
tions for each project for study and discussion with the Planning
Commission and Solid Waste Commission at their October 15 Joint Work-
shop. By releasing these preliminary draft conditions, there will be
a clear understanding that such an action constitutes neither support
nor opposition by the Community Development Department. Usually,
conditions of approval are not issued until a decision has been made
to recommend approval of the project. Most of the conditions will be
mitigation measures from the EIRs for the three sites and the policy
statements adopted by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of
the Solid Waste Commission.
The conditions of approval will address a wide variety of mitigation
measures and operational constraints. For example, categories of
conditions are expected to include:
Administration
Air Quality
Biotic Resources
Cultural Resources
Economics
Groundwater Protection
Landfill Gas
Land Use
Litter
Noise
Public Services & Utilities
Safety & Public Health
Security
Stability & Seismic
Surface Water Protection
Traffic/Transportation
STATUS REPORT ON THREE PRIVATELY- -3- Sept.16, 1986
PROPOSED LANDFILL APPLICATIONS
Vectors
Visual Quality
The above categories are meant to be illustrative and not necessarily
exclusive. -
If a recommendation for approval is made by the Community Development
Department, the conditions of approval would ensure that any landfill
. will be constructed and operated with the highest environmental
protections. One of the major mitigation measures which has already
been approved by the Board of Supervisors as a solid waste policy
statement is the requirement for transfer stations. Transfer stations
will drastically reduce traffic impacts of all landfills. It is also
important to remember that the landfills will also require permits
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Area Air
Quality Management District which have strict regulations protecting
air and water quality.
Staff will be in attendance at the Board meeting to answer any other
questions that the Board may have.
DBOcl
L1:dw3 :BOS3appl.t9
cc: County Planning Commission
Solid Waste Commission
County Administrator
STATUS OF SANITARY LANDFILL PROPOSALS
September 16, 1986
"X" means Needed
Central Kirker Pass East CC Sanitary
Landfill Landfill Landfill
General Plan X ( 1) X ( 2 ) X ( 3 )
Change
Rezoning X ( 1) X ( 2)
Agric.Preserve X ( 1) X ( 2 )
Cancellation
Land Use Permit X ( 1) X ( 2) X ( 3 )
(Requested by applicant)
Solid Waste Plan
Amendment X X X
BAAQMB X X X
Permit
SF Reg SF Reg Central Reg
Reg. Water
Qual. Permit X X X
Facilities X X X
Permit
Hearing on Certified Response Document
EIR Status 9/23 by by Planning in preparation
9/16/86 Ping.Comm. Commission
1. Planning Commission Hearing continued to September 23 .
2. Planning Commission Hearing continued to September 30.
3. Planning Commission Hearing continued to October 28.
PEKcl
Ll:dw3 :stat3app.t9