HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05082012 - C.285(&200(1'$7,216
5()(56%'H6DXOQLHU+RXVLQJ2SSRUWXQLW\DQG0DUNHW6WDELOL]DWLRQDELOOWKDWZRXOGZRXOGLPSRVHDIHH
RIRQWKHUHFRUGLQJRIHDFKUHDOHVWDWHUHODWHGGRFXPHQWH[FHSWIRUWKRVHGRFXPHQWVUHFRUGHGLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWK
DWUDQVIHUVXEMHFWWRGRFXPHQWDU\WUDQVIHUWD[DQGGLUHFWVWKHPRQH\WRWKH+RXVLQJ2SSRUWXQLW\DQG0DUNHW
6WDELOL]DWLRQ+20H67UXVW)XQGWRWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHIRUUHFRQVLGHUDWLRQ
),6&$/,03$&7
7KLVELOOLPSRVHVDIHHRQWKHUHFRUGDWLRQRIHDFKUHDOHVWDWHGRFXPHQWH[FOXGLQJGRFXPHQWVUHODWHGWRWKHVDOH
RIDSURSHUW\LQRUGHUWRSHUPDQHQWO\IXQGWKH+RXVLQJ2SSRUWXQLW\DQG0DUNHW6WDELOL]DWLRQ+20H67UXVW)XQG
WKDWZLOOVXSSRUWWKHGHYHORSPHQWDFTXLVLWLRQUHKDELOLWDWLRQDQGSUHVHUYDWLRQRIKRPHVDIIRUGDEOHWRORZDQG
PRGHUDWHLQFRPHKRXVHKROGVLQFOXGLQJHPHUJHQF\
VKHOWHUVWUDQVLWLRQDODQGSHUPDQHQWUHQWDOKRXVLQJIRUHFORVXUHPLWLJDWLRQDQGKRPHRZQHUVKLSRSSRUWXQLWLHV
,WLVHVWLPDWHGWKDWWKLVIHHZLOOJHQHUDWHDQDYHUDJHRIPLOOLRQSHU\HDUIRUWKH+20H67UXVW)XQG
$33529( 27+(5
5(&200(1'$7,212)&17<
$'0,1,675$725
5(&200(1'$7,212)%2$5'
&200,77((
$FWLRQRI%RDUG2Q$33529('$6
5(&200(1'('
27+(5
&OHUNV1RWHV
927(2)683(59,6256
$<(-RKQ*LRLD'LVWULFW,6XSHUYLVRU
0DU\13LHSKR'LVWULFW,,,
6XSHUYLVRU
.DUHQ0LWFKRII'LVWULFW,9
6XSHUYLVRU
)HGHUDO'*ORYHU'LVWULFW9
6XSHUYLVRU
$%6(17*D\OH%8LONHPD'LVWULFW,,
6XSHUYLVRU
&RQWDFW/'H/DQH\
,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVLVDWUXHDQGFRUUHFWFRS\RIDQDFWLRQWDNHQDQGHQWHUHGRQWKHPLQXWHVRIWKH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
RQWKHGDWHVKRZQ
$77(67('0D\
'DYLG-7ZD&RXQW\$GPLQLVWUDWRUDQG&OHUNRIWKH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
%\-XQH0F+XHQ'HSXW\
FF
&
7R %RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
)URP /HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH
'DWH 0D\
&RQWUD
&RVWD
&RXQW\
6XEMHFW5()(56%'H6DXOQLHU+RXVLQJ2SSRUWXQLW\DQG0DUNHW6WDELOL]DWLRQWRWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHIRU
5HFRQVLGHUDWLRQ
%$&.*5281'
6%'H6DXOQLHU±$V$PHQGHGRQ$SULO
6%E\6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHUZRXOGLPSRVHDIHHRIRQWKHUHFRUGLQJRIHDFKUHDOHVWDWHUHODWHG
GRFXPHQWH[FHSWIRUWKRVHGRFXPHQWVUHFRUGHGLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKDWUDQVIHUVXEMHFWWRGRFXPHQWDU\WUDQVIHUWD[
DQGGLUHFWVWKHPRQH\WRWKH+RXVLQJ2SSRUWXQLW\DQG0DUNHW6WDELOL]DWLRQ+20H67UXVW)XQG7KH+20H6
IXQGZRXOGEHXVHGIRUWKHGHYHORSPHQWDFTXLVLWLRQUHKDELOLWDWLRQDQGSUHVHUYDWLRQRIKRPHVDIIRUGDEOHWRORZ
DQGPRGHUDWHLQFRPHKRXVHKROGVLQFOXGLQJHPHUJHQF\VKHOWHUVWUDQVLWLRQDODQGSHUPDQHQWUHQWDOKRXVLQJ
IRUHFORVXUHPLWLJDWLRQDQGKRPHRZQHUVKLSRSSRUWXQLWLHV
6%ZDVSDVVHGRXWRIWKH6HQDWH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQDQG+RXVLQJ&RPPLWWHHRQ$SULOE\DYRWHRIWR,W
ZDVDOVRSDVVHGRXWRIWKH6HQDWH*RYHUQDQFHDQG)LQDQFH&RPPLWWHHRQ$SULOE\DYRWHRIWR7KH
PHDVXUHQRZDZDLWVDKHDULQJLQWKH6HQDWH$SSURSULDWLRQV&RPPLWWHH
$WWKHLU$SULOPHHWLQJWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHFRQVLGHUHGWKHELOODVLQWURGXFHGDQGUHFRPPHQGHGD
SRVLWLRQRI2SSRVHWRWKH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUVEDVHGLQSDUWRQREMHFWLRQVH[SUHVVHGE\WKH&RQWUD&RVWD
%RDUGRI5HDOWRUVWRWKHHIIHFWVRIWKHIHHRQWKHFRVWRIUHDOHVWDWHWUDQVDFWLRQV6WDIIKDGDOVRH[SUHVVHGFRQFHUQV
DERXWWKHGLVEXUVHPHQWRIWKHIXQGVZKLFKZRXOGEHPDGHE\DOORFDWLRQRIWKH/HJLVODWXUHRQDQDQQXDOEDVLV
6XEVHTXHQWWRWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHPHHWLQJRI$SULODPHQGPHQWVWRWKHELOOKDYHEHHQPDGHZKLFK
KDYHUHVXOWHGLQWKH&DOLIRUQLD$VVRFLDWLRQRI5HDOWRUV
FRPPLWPHQWRIVXSSRUWIRU6%DVDPHQGHGRQ$SULO
DQG$SULO,WLVDQWLFLSDWHGWKDWPRVWRUDOORIWKHORFDO5HDOWRUDVVRFLDWLRQVZLOOUHPRYHWKHLURSSRVLWLRQDQG
SRVVLEO\VXSSRUWWKHDPHQGHGELOO+RZHYHUWZRWD[SD\HURUJDQL]DWLRQVWKHEDQNHUVPRUWJDJHEDQNHUVODQGWLWOH
DVVRFLDWLRQDQGWKHFRXQW\UHFRUGHUVWKDWKDYHUHJLVWHUHGWKHLURSSRVLWLRQZLOOOLNHO\UHPDLQLQRSSRVLWLRQ
%HFDXVHWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHKDVQRWKDGDQRSSRUWXQLW\WRUHYLHZWKHELOODPHQGPHQWVLWLVUHFRPPHQGHG
WKDWWKHELOOEHUHIHUUHGEDFNWRWKH&RPPLWWHHIRUUHFRQVLGHUDWLRQ
&216(48(1&(2)1(*$7,9($&7,21
,IWKHELOOLVQRWUHIHUUHGEDFNWRWKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHIRUUHFRQVLGHUDWLRQWKHUHZLOOQRWEHD
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQWRWKH%RDUGRQDSRVLWLRQIRUWKLVELOO
$77$&+0(176
6%)DFW6KHHW
6%&RPPLWWHH$QDO\VLV
6%DVDPHQGHG
&$56XSSRUW/HWWHU
2IILFHRI6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHU
6%)DFW6KHHW
3DJH
SB 1220 (DeSaulnier and Steinberg)
As amended on April 16, 2012
PERMANENTLY FUNDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND MARKET
STABILIZATION (HOMeS) TRUST FUND
Fact Sheet
SUMMARY
This bill imposes a $75 fee on the recordation of
each real-estate document, excluding documents
related to the sale of a property, in order to
permanently fund the Housing Opportunity and
Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund that will
support the development, acquisition, rehabilitation,
and preservation of homes affordable to low- and
moderate-income households, including emergency
shelters, transitional and permanent rental housing,
foreclosure mitigation, and homeownership
opportunities.
It is estimated that this fee will generate an average
of $525 million per year for the HOMeS Trust Fund.
BACKGROUND
Having a healthy housing market that provides an
adequate supply of homes affordable to families and
individuals at all income levels is critical to the
economic prosperity and quality of life in
California. The decline in housing production has
played a significant role in creating and prolonging
the Great Recession. The lack of sufficient,
affordable homes near jobs impedes economic
growth and development by making it difficult for
California employers to attract and retain
employees. In addition, continued affordability gaps
mean that California has the second lowest
homeownership rate in the nation, that minimum
wage earners have to work 120 hours per week to
afford the average two bedroom rental apartment,
and that California has the largest population of
homeless persons in the nation.
In the face of these critical needs, California’s
investment in affordable housing is declining
dramatically. In 2000 and 2006, voters approved
roughly $5 billion in housing bonds. These funds
have financed the construction, rehabilitation and
preservation of over 11,600 shelter spaces and
57,220 affordable apartments, including 2,500
supportive homes for people experiencing
homelessness. In addition, these funds have helped
57,290 families become or remain homeowners.
Nearly all of the voter-approved funding for
affordable housing has now been awarded, and no
more bond funds are available.
In addition, California’s redevelopment agencies
used to generate $1 billion per year for affordable
homes as a result of the requirement that they set
aside 20% of tax increment for affordable housing.
With the elimination of redevelopment agencies,
this funding stream has disappeared completely.
The loss of these precious funds means that millions
of Californians affected by the state’s chronic
housing shortage, including seniors, veterans, people
experiencing chronic homelessness, working
families, people with mental, physical, or
developmental disabilities, agricultural workers,
people exiting jails, prisons, and other state
institutions, survivors of domestic violence, and
former foster and transition-aged youth, will remain
unhoused or living in substandard and unaffordable
conditions.
California desperately needs a permanent, ongoing
source or sources of funding dedicated to affordable
housing development. Such investment will create
consistency and predictability in the affordable
housing market, leverage billions of dollars in
private investment, lessen demands on law
enforcement and dwindling health care resources as
fewer people are forced to live on the streets or in
dangerous substandard buildings, and increase
businesses’ ability to attract and retain skilled
workers. In addition, a dedicated revenue source
will allow a “pay as you go” approach, as opposed
2IILFHRI6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHU
6%)DFW6KHHW
3DJH
to issuing bonds that require additional interest
costs.
STATUS
In the Senate Appropriations Committee.
SUPPORT
California Housing Consortium (sponsor)
Housing California (sponsor)
8 past directors of the Department of Housing and
Community Development
AARP
A&B Painting
A Community of Friends
Affirmed Housing Group
Affordable Housing Associates
Aging Services of California
Alameda County Developmental Disability Council
Alliance for Regional Solutions
Alpha Construction Company
AMCAL Multi-Housing
Amy Hiestad Consulting
Anderson and Associates
Asian Pacific Environmental Network
BAR Architects
BAYC
Berkeley Food and Housing Project
Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center
Bonita House
Brayer Electric Company
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
BRC Advisors
Building Futures with Women and Children
Burbank Housing Corporation
Burbank Housing Development Corporation
Business Leaders Task Force
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
Cahill Contractors
California Association of Housing Authorities
California Association of Local Housing Finance
Agencies
California Association of Realtors
California Association of Social Rehabilitation
Agencies
California Building Industry Association
California Coalition for Rural Housing
California Coalition for Youth
California Housing Partnership Corporation
California Infill Builders Association
California Labor Federation
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Calistoga Affordable Housing
Caritas Management Corporation
Center for Elders’ Independence
Center for Sustainable Neighborhoods
Center on Policy Initiatives
Central Coast Residential Builders
Century Housing
Charities Housing
Christian Church Homes
City of Burbank
City of Dublin
City of Oakland
City and County of San Francisco
City of San Leandro
City of Santa Monica
City Heights Community Development Corporation
Clifford Beers Housing
CLUE-LA
Collaborative Project Consulting
Community Action to Fight Asthma
Community Economics
Community Corporation of Santa Monica
Community Housing Opportunities Corporation
Community Housing Partnership
Community Housing Works
Community Interfaith Services
Comprehensive Child Development
Core Companies
Corporation for Supportive Housing
Dahlin Group Architecture Planning
Design Electric
EAH Housing
East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation
East Bay Housing Organizations
Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.
Eden Housing
Enterprise Community Partners
Equity Community Builders
Eugene Burger Management Corporation
EveryOne Home
First United Methodist Church of Los Angeles
Fred Finch Youth Center
Goldfarb Lipman Attorneys
Greenbelt Alliance
Habitat for Humanity California
Habitat for Humanity East Bay
2IILFHRI6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHU
6%)DFW6KHHW
3DJH
Habitat for Humanity Greater Los Angeles
Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco
Hearth Homes
Heffernan Insurance Brokers
Housing Advisory Group
Housing Consortium of the East Bay
Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County
Housing Trust of Santa Clara County
ICON Builders
Interfaith Committee for Worker Justice of San
Diego County
Islamic Shura Council of Southern California
Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation
Jamboree Housing Corporation
John Burton Foundation for Children Without
Homes
Koning Eizenberg Architecture
Larkin Street Youth Services
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley
League of Women Voters of California
League of Women Voters of Marin County
Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects
LifeLong Medical Care
LifeSTEPS
Local Initiatives Support Corporation Bay Area
Local Initiatives Support Corporation Los Angeles
Los Angeles Business Council
L.A Family Housing
Many Mansions
Marin Environmental Housing Collaborative
Marin Partnership to End Homelessness
Mental Health America of Los Angeles
Mercy Housing
MidPen Housing
Mikiten Architecture
Miller, Morton, Caillat, & Nevis
Mill Valley Affordable Housing Committee
Mogavero Notestine Associates
Morley Builders
Move LA
Napa Valley Community Housing
National Equity Fund
National Housing Law Project
National Youth Law Center
Natural Resources Defense Council
Neighborhood Housing Services Silicon Valley
New Directions
New Image Emergency Shelter for the Homeless
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern
California
North County Lifeline
Opportunity Fund Northern California
Orange County Business Council
Palm Communities
Palo Alto Housing Corporation
Permacity
Project Sentinel
Pyatok Architects
Public Advocates
DRA Infill Coalition
Regional Asthma Management and Prevention
Related California
Resources for Community Development
Rural Community Assistance Corporation
Sacramento Housing Alliance
Sacramento Yolo Mutual Housing Association
St. Anne’s
St. Anthony Foundation
St. Ignatius Parish, San Francisco
St. John the Baptist Catholic Church of Baldwin
Park
San Diego Building Trades Council Family Housing
Corporation
San Diego City Councilman Todd Gloria
San Diego Housing Federation
San Diego LGBT Community Center
San Diego Organizing Project
San Gabriel Valley Housing and Homeless
Coordinating Council
San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund
Satellite Housing
Self-Help Enterprises
Shelter, Inc.
Sierra Business Council
Silicon Valley Leadership Group
Sonoma County Task Force for the Homeless
South County Housing
Southern California Association of Non-Profit
Housing
Southern California Housing Collaborative
Stand Up for Neighborly Novato
State Building and Construction Trades Council of
California
Stocktonians Taking Action to Neutralize Drugs
Sun Country Builders
Sunseri Construction
Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation
The Arc
Treasure Island Homeless Development Initiative
Ubuntu Green
2IILFHRI6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHU
6%)DFW6KHHW
3DJH
United Cerebral Palsy in California
United Homeless Healthcare Partners
Urban Habitat
USA Properties
Veterans Association of North County
Walton Construction Services
West Bay Housing Corporation
Western Center on Law and Poverty
Westport Construction
Yolo Community Care Continuum
OPPOSITION
[NOTE: The California Association of Realtors
has committed to support SB 1220 as amended
on April 12 and April 16. It is anticipated that
most or all of the following local Realtor
associations will remove their opposition and
possibly support the amended bill. It is further
anticipated that the two taxpayer organizations,
the bankers, mortgage bankers, land title
association, and the county recorders will remain
in opposition.]
Amador County Association of Realtors
Asian Real Estate Association of America
Bakersfield Association of Realtors
Berkeley Association of Realtors
Beverly Hills/Greater Los Angeles Association of
Realtors
Big Bear Association of Realtors
Burbank Association of Realtors
Calaveras County Association of Realtors
California Bankers Association
California Land Title Association
California Mortgage Bankers Association
California Taxpayers Association
Chico Association of Realtors
Coastal Mendocino Association of Realtors
Conejo Simi Moorpark Association of Realtors
Contra Costa Association of Realtors
County Recorders Association of California
Del Norte Association of Realtors
Delta Association of Realtors
Desert Communities Association of Realtors
Downey Association of Realtors
El Dorado County Association of Realtors
Fresno Association of Realtors
Greater Antelope Valley Association of Realtors
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Humboldt Association of Realtors
Idlyllwild Association of Realtors
Imperial County Association of Realtors
Inglewood Board of Realtors
Inland Gateway Association of Realtors
Kings County Board of Realtors
Lodi Association of Realtors
Malibu Association of Realtors
Mammoth Lakes Board of Realtors
Mariposa County Board of Realtors
Merced County Association of Realtors
Montebello District Board of Realtors
Monterey County Association of Realtors
Nevada County Association of Realtors
North Bay Association of Realtors
North San Diego County Association of Realtors
Oakland Association of Realtors
Ojai Valley Board of Realtors
Orange County Association of Realtors
Oroville Association of Realtors
Pacific West Association of Realtors
Pajaro Valley Association of Realtors
Palm Springs Regional Association of Realtors
Palos Verdes Peninsula Association of Realtors
Paradise Association of Realtors
Pasadena-Foothills Association of Realtors
Paso Robles Association of Realtors
Pismo Coast Association of Realtors
Placer County Association of Realtors
Plumas Association of Realtors
Rancho Southeast Association of Realtors
Sacramento Association of Realtors
San Benito County Association of Realtors
San Francisco Association of Realtors
San Luis Obispo Association of Realtors
San Mateo County Association of Realtors
Santa Barbara Association of Realtors
Santa Ynez Valley Association of Realtors
Shasta Association of Realtors
Silicon Valley Association of Realtors
South Bay Association of Realtors
Southland Regional Association of Realtors
South Tahoe Association of Realtors
Southwest Los Angeles Association of Realtors
Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors
Sutter-Yuba Association of Realtors
Tehachapi Area Association of Realtors
Tulare County Association of Realtors
2IILFHRI6HQDWRU0DUN'H6DXOQLHU
6%)DFW6KHHW
3DJH
Tuolumne County Association of Realtors
Ventura County Coastal Association of Realtors
Victor Valley Association of Realtors
West Contra Costa Association of Realtors
Yolo County Board of Realtors
Yosemite Gateway Association of Realtors
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Mark Stivers
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee
(916) 651-4121
Mark.stivers@sen.ca.gov
State Net | 2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN
AUTHOR: desaulnier
VERSION: 4/16/12
Analysis by: Mark Stivers
FISCAL: yes
Hearing date: April 24, 2012
SUBJECT:
Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund
DESCRIPTION:
This bill imposes a fee of $75 on the recording of each real-estate related document, except
for those documents recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer
tax, and directs the money to the Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust
Fund. The Legislature may then appropriate these funds for the development, acquisition,
rehabilitation, and preservation of homes affordable to low- and moderate-income households,
including emergency shelters, transitional and permanent rental housing, foreclosure
mitigation, and homeownership opportunities.
ANALYSIS:
Current law establishes a number of programs at the Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD) and the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) to make
housing more affordable to California families and individuals, including the following mainline
programs:
Multifamily Housing Program, which funds the new construction, rehabilitation, and
preservation of permanent and transitional rental homes for lower income households through
loans to local governments, non-profit developers, and for-profit developers.
Joe Serna, Jr. Farmworker Housing Program, which funds the development of ownership or
rental homes for agricultural workers through grants to local governments and non-profit
organizations.
Emergency Housing Assistance Program, which funds emergency shelters and transitional
homes for homeless individuals and families through grants to counties and non-profit entities
for rehabilitation, renovation, expansion, site acquisition, and equipment.
CalHome Program, which funds downpayment assistance, home rehabilitation, counseling,
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 5) [5/2/2012 5:05:24 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
self-help mortgage assistance programs, and technical assistance for self-help and shared
housing through grants and loans.
California Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance Program, which aids first-time homebuyers
with down payment and/or closing costs.
Historically, the state has funded these programs through the sale of general obligations
bonds. Most recently, the voters approved a $2.1 billion bond through Proposition 46 in 2002
and then $2.85 billion through Proposition 1C in 2006. HCD has awarded almost all of the
funds made available under these propositions, particularly in these mainline programs.
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law required redevelopment agencies to set
aside 20% of all tax increment revenue to increase, improve, and preserve the community's
supply of low and moderate income housing available at an affordable housing cost. In fiscal
year 2009/10, redevelopment agencies deposited $1.075 billion of property tax increment
revenues into their Low and Moderate-Income Housing Funds. With the elimination of
redevelopment agencies, this source of funding for affordable housing is no longer available.
This bill imposes a fee of $75 on the recording of each real-estate related document, except
for those documents recorded in connection with a transfer subject to a documentary transfer
tax, and directs the money to the HOMeS Trust Fund.
The Legislature may then appropriate these funds for the development, acquisition,
rehabilitation, and preservation of homes affordable to low- and moderate-income households,
including emergency shelters, transitional and permanent rental housing, foreclosure
mitigation, and homeownership opportunities. The bill further requires HCD to report annually
on the expenditure of these funds and requires the Bureau of State Audits to conduct periodic
audits to ensure that departments award appropriated funds in a timely fashion and consistent
with legal requirements.
COMMENTS:
1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, having a healthy housing market that
provides an adequate supply of homes affordable to families and individuals at all income
levels is critical to the economic prosperity and quality of life in California. The decline in
housing production has played a significant role in creating and prolonging the Great
Recession. The lack of sufficient, affordable homes near jobs impedes economic growth and
development by making it difficult for California employers to attract and retain employees.
Moreover, continued affordability gaps mean that California has the second lowest
homeownership rate in the nation, that minimum wage earners have to work 120 hours per
week to afford the average two bedroom rental apartment, and that California has the largest
population of homeless persons in the nation.
The exhaustion of bond funds and the elimination of redevelopment agencies means that
millions of Californians affected by the state's chronic housing shortage, including seniors,
veterans, people experiencing chronic homelessness, working families, people with mental,
physical, or developmental disabilities, agricultural workers, people exiting jails, prisons, and
other state institutions, survivors of domestic violence, and former foster and transition-aged
youth, will remain unhoused or living in substandard and unaffordable conditions.
California desperately needs a permanent, ongoing source or sources of funding dedicated
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 5) [5/2/2012 5:05:24 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
to affordable housing development. Such investment will create consistency and predictability
in the affordable housing market, leverage billions of dollars in private investment, lessen
demands on law enforcement and dwindling health care resources as fewer people are forced
to live on the streets or in dangerous substandard buildings, and increase businesses' ability to
attract and retain skilled workers. In addition, a dedicated revenue source will allow a "pay as
you go" approach, as opposed to issuing bonds that require additional interest costs.
2. Exempts documents related to sale transactions. In order to promote homeownership
opportunities, this bill exempts documents made in connection with the sale of real property
from the new fee. This will ensure that transaction costs do not increase for homebuyers.
3. Revenue projections. Based on recording data from a variety of past years, it is
estimated that this bill will generate an average of $525 million per year for the HOMeS Trust
Fund, ranging from $300 million per year in low-volume years to $750 million per year in high-
volume years.
4. Allocation to be determined. This bill requires that monies in the HOMeS Trust Fund go
for the development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of homes affordable to low-
and moderate-income households, including emergency shelters, transitional and permanent
rental housing, foreclosure mitigation, and homeownership opportunities. Aside from these
general parameters, however, this bill does not allocate funds to particular programs or uses.
Instead, it leaves the decision on allocation to the Legislature each year as part of the budget
process. This provides less certainty but ensures that funds can address priority housing needs
as they change through the years. Nonetheless, it is the author's intent that these monies fund
a variety of housing needs, ranging from homeless shelters to rental housing to
homeownership, and, where possible, use established and well-understood programs. In
addition to funding statewide programs, the Legislature could also designate a portion of the
funds as block grants for cities and counties that meet certain thresholds.
5. Types of documents covered. This bill applies the $75 fee to the recording of all real
estate-related documents except those recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the
imposition of a documentary transfer tax and those expressly exempted from payment of
recording fees. There are many types of documents that fall under the proposed fee, including,
but not limited to:
Deeds Grant deeds Trustee's deeds Deeds of trust Reconveyances Quit claim deeds
Fictitious deeds of trust Assignments of deeds of trust Requests for notice of default Abstracts
of judgment Subordination agreements
Declarations of homestead Abandonments of homestead Notices of default Releases or
discharges Easements Notices of trustee sale Notices of completion Mechanic's liens Maps
Covenants, conditions, and restrictions
1. Two-thirds vote required. Legislative Counsel has determined that this bill would result in
a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of
Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution and thus requires a 2/3 vote for
passage.
2. Arguments in opposition. The California Taxpayers Association argues that the fee is
unreasonable and that funding for low-income housing should not be placed on the backs of
people trying to record documents. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association believes that this
is the wrong time to increase taxes against struggling California families already suffering
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 5) [5/2/2012 5:05:24 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
through the highest foreclosure rates in 70 years. It cites research ranking California as 14th
among the states in combined state and local per capita property taxes and believes that
existing taxes on property are already excessive. The County Recorders Association of
California writes that the new fee places additional financial burdens at the expense of ordinary
Californians and will result in significant increases in staff time to collect fees and address
unsatisfied customers.
The committee also received 73 letters of opposition from local realtor boards based on the
introduced version of the bill. With the recent amendments to the bill that won the support of
the California Association of Realtors, it is assumed that these letters are no longer current.
3. Double referral. The Rules Committee has referred this bill to both this committee and
the Governance and Finance Committee. Because the Governance and Finance Committee is
scheduled to hear this bill on April 25, the author should take any amendments agreed to in
this committee in the Governance and Finance Committee.
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, April 18, 2012)
SUPPORT:
California Housing Consortium (sponsor) Housing California (sponsor) AARP A&B Painting
Affirmed Housing Group Affordable Housing Associates Aging Services of California Alameda
County Developmental Disability Council Alliance for Regional Solutions Alpha Construction
Company AMCAL Multi-Housing Anderson and Associates Asian Pacific Environmental Network
BAR Architects BAYC Berkeley Food and Housing Project Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center
Bonita House Brayer Electric Company BRC Advisors Building Futures with Women and
Children Burbank Housing Corporation Burbank Housing Development Corporation Business
Leaders Task Force Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation Cahill Contractors California
Association of Housing Authorities California Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies
California Association of Realtors California Building Industry Association California Coalition for
Rural Housing California Coalition for Youth California Housing Partnership Corporation
California Infill Builders Association California Labor Federation California Rural Legal
Assistance Foundation Calistoga Affordable Housing Caritas Management Corporation Center
for Sustainable Neighborhoods Center on Policy Initiatives Central Coast Residential Builders
Century Housing Charities Housing Christian Church Homes City of Dublin City of Oakland City
of San Leandro City Heights Community Development Corporation Clifford Beers Housing CLUE-
LA Collaborative Project Consulting Community Action to Fight Asthma Community Economics
Community Corporation of Santa Monica Community Housing Opportunities Corporation
Community Housing Partnership Community Housing Works Community Interfaith Services
Community of Friends Core Companies Corporation for Supportive Housing Dahlin Group
Architecture Planning EAH Housing East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation East Bay
Housing Organizations Eden Housing Enterprise Community Partners Equity Community
Builders Eugene Burger Management Corporation EveryOne Home First United Methodist
Church of Los Angeles Fred Finch Youth Center Goldfarb Lipman Attorneys Greenbelt Alliance
Habitat for Humanity California Habitat for Humanity East Bay Habitat for Humanity Greater
Los Angeles Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco Hearth Homes Heffernan Insurance
Brokers Housing Advisory Group Housing Consortium of the East Bay Housing Leadership
Council of San Mateo County Housing Trust of Santa Clara County ICON Builders Interfaith
Committee for Worker Justice of San Diego County Islamic Shura Council of Southern
California Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation Jamboree Housing Corporation John
Burton Foundation for Children Without Homes Koning Eizenberg Architecture Larkin Street
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (4 of 5) [5/2/2012 5:05:24 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1220: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
Youth Services Law Foundation of Silicon Valley League of Women Voters of California League
of Women Voters of Marin County Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects LifeLong Medical Care
LifeSTEPS LISC Bay Area Los Angeles Business Council L.A Family Housing Many Mansions
Marin Environmental Housing Collaborative Marin Partnership to End Homelessness Mental
Health America of Los Angeles Mercy Housing MidPen Housing Mikiten Architecture Mill Valley
Affordable Housing Committee Morley Builders Move LA Napa Valley Community Housing
National Equity Fund Natural Resources Defense Council Neighborhood Housing Services
Silicon Valley New Directions Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California North
County Lifeline Opportunity Fund Northern California Orange County Business Council Palm
Communities Project Sentinel Pyatok Architects Public Advocates DRA Infill Coalition Regional
Asthma Management and Prevention Related California Resources for Community Development
Rural Community Assistance Corporation Sacramento Housing Alliance Sacramento Yolo
Mutual Housing Association St. Anne's St. Anthony Foundation St. Ignatius Parish, San
Francisco San Diego Building Trades Council Family Housing Corporation San Diego Housing
Federation San Diego LGBT Community Center San Gabriel Valley Housing and Homeless
Coordinating Council San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund Satellite Housing Self-Help
Enterprises Shelter, Inc. Sierra Business Council Silicon Valley Leadership Group South County
Housing Southern California Association of Non-Profit Housing Stand Up for Neighborly Novato
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California Stocktonians Taking Action to
Neutralize Drugs Sun Country Builders Sunseri Construction Treasure Island Homeless
Development Initiative United Homeless Healthcare Partners USA Properties Veterans
Association of North County Walton Construction Services West Bay Housing Corporation
Western Center on Law and Poverty Westport Construction Yolo Community Care Continuum
OPPOSED:
California Bankers Association California Land Title Association California Mortgage Bankers
Association California Taxpayers Association County Recorders Association of California Howard
Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (5 of 5) [5/2/2012 5:05:24 PM]
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 16, 2012
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 12, 2012
SENATE BILL No. 1220
1
2
3
Introduced by Senators DeSaulnier and Steinberg
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Atkins)
(Coauthors: Senators Leno and Rubio)
February 23, 2012
1
2
3
An act to add Section 27388.1 to the Government Code, and to add
Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 50470) to Part 2 of Division 31
of the Health and Safety Code, relating to housing.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB1220, as amended, DeSaulnier.Housing Opportunity and Market
Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund Act of 2012.
Under existing law, there are programs providing assistance for,
among other things, emergency housing, multifamily housing,
farmworker housing, home ownership for very low and low-income
households, and downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers.
Existing law also authorizes the issuance of bonds in specified amounts
pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law. Existing law
requires that proceeds from the sale of these bonds be used to finance
various existing housing programs, capital outlay related to infill
development, brownfield cleanup that promotes infill development, and
housing-related parks.
This bill would enact the Housing Opportunity and Market
Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund Act of 2012. The bill would make
legislative findings and declarations relating to the need for establishing
permanent, ongoing sources of funding dedicated to affordable housing
development. The bill would impose a fee, except as provided, of $75
97
to be paid at the time of the recording of every real estate instrument,
paper, or notice required or permitted by law to be recorded. By
imposing new duties on counties with respect to the imposition of the
recording fee, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require that revenues from this fee be sent quarterly to
the Department of Housing and Community Development for deposit
in the Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust
Fund, which the bill would create within the State Treasury. The bill
would provide that moneys in the fund may be expended for the purpose
of supporting affordable housing, as specified. The bill would impose
certain auditing and reporting requirements.
This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of
increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article
XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage
the approval of 2⁄3 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act
for a specified reason.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SECTION 1. This act shall be known as the Housing
Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund Act
of 2012.
SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that having a healthy
housing market that provides an adequate supply of homes
affordable to Californians at all income levels is critical to the
economic prosperity and quality of life in the state. The Legislature
further finds and declares all of the following:
(a) Funding approved by the state’s voters in 2002 and 2006,
as of June 2011, has financed the construction, rehabilitation, and
preservation of over 11,600 shelter spaces and 57,220 affordable
apartments, including 2,500 supportive homes for people
experiencing homelessness. In addition, these funds have helped
57,290 families become or remain homeowners. Nearly all of the
97
— 2 —SB 1220
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
voter-approved funding for affordable housing was awarded by
the beginning of 2012.
(b) The requirement in the Community Redevelopment Law
that redevelopment agencies set aside 20 percent of tax increment
for affordable housing generated roughly one billion dollars
($1,000,000,000) per year. With the elimination of redevelopment
agencies, this funding stream has disappeared.
(c) California has 12 percent of the United States population
but 21.4 percent of its homeless population. Seventy-three percent
of people experiencing homelessness in California fell into it
because they could not afford a place to live. Sixty-two percent of
homeless Californians are unsheltered, 14 percent are veterans,
and 20 percent are families.
(d) Furthermore, 4 of the top 10 metropolitan areas in the
country for homeless are in the following metropolitan areas in
California: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Los Angeles-Long
Beach-Santa Ana, Fresno, and Stockton.
(e) California continues to have the second lowest
homeownership rate in the nation, and minimum wage earners
have to work 120 hours per week to afford the average
two-bedroom apartment.
(f) Millions of Californians are affected by the state’s chronic
housing shortage, including seniors, veterans, people experiencing
chronic homelessness, working families, people with mental,
physical, or developmental disabilities, agricultural workers, people
exiting jails, prisons, and other state institutions, survivors of
domestic violence, and former foster and transition-aged youth.
(g) While the current credit and foreclosure crisis has resulted
in reductions in home prices in some areas, it has increased pressure
on the rental housing market and slowed new housing production
of all types, exacerbating the mismatch between the ever increasing
number of households that need housing they can afford and the
supply.
(h) California’s workforce continues to experience longer
commute times as persons in the workforce seek affordable housing
outside the areas in which they work. If California is unable to
support the construction of affordable housing in these areas,
congestion problems will strain the state’s transportation system
and exacerbate greenhouse gas emissions.
97
SB 1220
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(i) Many economists agree that the state’s unemployment rate
of over 11 percent is due in large part to massive shrinkage in the
construction industry from 2005 to 2009, including losses of nearly
700,000 construction-related jobs, a 60-percent decline in
construction spending, and an83-percent reduction in residential
permits. Restoration of a healthy construction sector will
significantly reduce the state’s unemployment rate.
(j) The lack of sufficient housing impedes economic growth
and development by making it difficult for California employers
to attract and retain employees.
(k) To keep pace with continuing demand, the state should
identify and establish a permanent, ongoing source or sources of
funding dedicated to affordable housing development. Without a
reliable source of funding for housing affordable to the state’s
workforce and most vulnerable residents, the state and its local
and private housing development partners will not be able to
continue increasing the supply of housing after existing housing
bond resources are depleted.
(l) The investment will leverage billions of dollars in private
investment, lessen demands on law enforcement and dwindling
health care resources as fewer people are forced to live on the
streets or in dangerous substandard buildings, and increase
businesses’ ability to attract and retain skilled workers.
(m) In order to promote housing and homeownership
opportunities, the recording fee imposed by this act should not be
applied to any recordings made in connection with a sale of real
property. Purchasing housing is likely the largest purchase made
by Californians, and it is the intent of this act not to increase
transaction costs associated with these transfers.
SEC. 3. Section 27388.1 is added to the Government Code, to
read:
27388.1. (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in
addition to any other recording fees specified in this code, a fee
of seventy-five dollars ($75) shall be paid at the time of recording
of every real estate instrument, paper, or notice required or
permitted by law to be recorded except those expressly exempted
from payment of recording fees. “Real estate instrument” includes,
but is not limited to, the following documents: deed, grant deed,
trustee’s deed, deed of trust, reconveyance, quit claim deed,
fictitious deed of trust, assignment of deed of trust, request for
97
— 4 —SB 1220
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
notice of default, abstract of judgment, subordination agreement,
declaration of homestead, abandonment of homestead, notice of
default, release or discharge, easement, notice of trustee sale, notice
of completion, UCC financing statement, mechanic’s lien, maps,
and covenants, conditions, and restrictions.
(2) The fee described in paragraph (1) shall not be imposed at
the time of recording of on any real estate instrument, paper, or
notice recorded in connection with a transfer subject to the
imposition of a documentary transfer tax as defined in Section
11911 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(b) The fees, after deduction of any actual and necessary
administrative costs incurred by the county in carrying out this
section, shall be sent quarterly to the Department of Housing and
Community Development for deposit in the Housing Opportunity
and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund established by
Section 50471 of the Health and Safety Code to be expended for
the purposes set forth in that section. In addition, the county shall
pay to the Department of Housing and Community Development
interest, at the legal rate, on any funds not paid to the Controller
within 30 days of the end of a quarter.
SEC. 4. Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 50470) is added
to Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:
Chapter 2.5. Housing Opportunity and Market
Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust Fund
Article 1. General Provisions
50470. This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the
Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust
Fund Act of 2012.
50471. (a) There is hereby created in the State Treasury the
Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS) Trust
Fund. All interest or other increments resulting from the investment
of moneys in the fund shall be deposited in the fund,
notwithstanding Section 16305.7 of the Government Code. Moneys
in the Housing Opportunity and Market Stabilization (HOMeS)
Trust Fund shall not be subject to transfer to any other fund
pursuant to any provision of Part 2 (commencing with Section
16300) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code, except
97
SB 1220
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
to the Surplus Money Investment Fund. Upon appropriation by
the Legislature, moneys in the fund may be expended for the
purpose of supporting the development, acquisition, rehabilitation,
and preservation of housing affordable to low- and
moderate-income households, including, but not limited to,
emergency shelters; transitional and permanent rental housing,
including necessary service and operating subsidies; foreclosure
mitigation; and homeownership opportunities.
(b) Both of the following shall be paid and deposited in the
fund:
(1) Any moneys appropriated and made available by the
Legislature for purposes of the fund.
(2) Any other moneys that may be made available to the
department for the purposes of the fund from any other source or
sources.
Article 2. Audits and Reporting
50475. The Bureau of State Audits shall conduct periodic audits
to ensure that the annual allocation to individual programs is
awarded by the department in a timely fashion consistent with the
requirements of this chapter. The first audit shall be conducted no
later than 24 months from the effective date of this section.
50476. In its annual report to the Legislature pursuant to
Section 50408, the department shall report how funds that were
made available pursuant to this chapter and allocated in the prior
year were expended. The department shall make the report
available to the public on its Internet Web site.
SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because
a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service
charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or
level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section
17556 of the Government Code.
O
97
— 6 —SB 1220