HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05082012 - SD.45(&200(1'$7,216
&216,'(5DGRSWLQJSRVLWLRQVRQYDULRXVELOOVUHODWHGWR5HGHYHORSPHQW6XFFHVVRU$JHQFLHVDQG5HGHYHORSPHQW
&OHDQXSDVUHFRPPHQGHGE\WKH/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH
$%3HUH]6XSSRUWDQGUHTXHVWDPHQGPHQW
6%6WHLQEHUJ6XSSRUW
6%6WHLQEHUJ6XSSRUWLIDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHIXQGLQJWRSUHSDUHSODQ
6%'XWWRQ6XSSRUW
),6&$/,03$&7
$FFRUGLQJWRWKH$VVHPEO\
$33529( 27+(5
5(&200(1'$7,212)&17<
$'0,1,675$725
5(&200(1'$7,212)%2$5'
&200,77((
$FWLRQRI%RDUG2Q$33529('$6
5(&200(1'('
27+(5
&OHUNV1RWHV
927(2)683(59,6256
$<(-RKQ*LRLD'LVWULFW,6XSHUYLVRU
0DU\13LHSKR'LVWULFW,,,
6XSHUYLVRU
.DUHQ0LWFKRII'LVWULFW,9
6XSHUYLVRU
)HGHUDO'*ORYHU'LVWULFW9
6XSHUYLVRU
$%6(17*D\OH%8LONHPD'LVWULFW,,
6XSHUYLVRU
&RQWDFW/'H/DQH\
,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWWKLVLVDWUXHDQGFRUUHFWFRS\RIDQDFWLRQWDNHQDQGHQWHUHGRQWKHPLQXWHVRIWKH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
RQWKHGDWHVKRZQ
$77(67('0D\
'DYLG-7ZD&RXQW\$GPLQLVWUDWRUDQG&OHUNRIWKH%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
%\-XQH0F+XHQ'HSXW\
FF
6'
7R %RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
)URP /HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH
'DWH 0D\
&RQWUD
&RVWD
&RXQW\
6XEMHFW 5HFRPPHQGHG3RVLWLRQVRQ9DULRXV5HGHYHORSPHQW&OHDQXS%LOOV
),6&$/,03$&7&217
'
$SSURSULDWLRQV&RPPLWWHHWKHILVFDOHIIHFWRI$%ZRXOGEHDVIROORZV
,QWKHDEVHQFHRIWKLVELOODSSUR[LPDWHO\ELOOLRQZRXOGEHDOORFDWHGWRRWKHUXQLWVRIORFDOJRYHUQPHQW
DFFRUGLQJWRH[LVWLQJODZRQWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRIORFDOSURSHUW\WD[7RWKHH[WHQWWKLVELOOSUHYHQWVWKHVHUHYHQXHV
IURPIORZLQJWRVFKRROGLVWULFWVWKHUHZRXOGEHDFRUUHVSRQGLQJFRVWWRWKH*HQHUDO)XQGDVWKHSURSHUW\WD[
ZRXOGRWKHUZLVHRIIVHW*HQHUDO)XQGREOLJDWLRQVWRVFKRROVSXUVXDQWWRWKH3URSRVLWLRQPLQLPXPIXQGLQJ
JXDUDQWHH7KHDFWXDOLPSDFWWRWKH*HQHUDO)XQGLVXQNQRZQEHFDXVHLWZLOOGHSHQGRQWKHQXPEHURIVFKRRO
GLVWULFWVWKDWDUHEDVLFDLGDQGWKHDPRXQWRIXQUHVHUYHGKRXVLQJIXQGVWKDWZRXOGRWKHUZLVHEHDOORFDWHGWR.
VFKRROVDEVHQWWKLVELOO7KHELOOLRQLVEDVHGRQLQIRUPDWLRQWKDW5'$VUHSRUWHGWRWKH6WDWH&RQWUROOHUIRU
WKHILVFDO\HDUDQGWKDWQXPEHUFRXQWVDVVHWVZKLFKZRXOGKDYHWREHVROGDQGDUHYDOXHGDWWKHDFWXDO
FRVWRIDFTXLVLWLRQQRWPDUNHWYDOXH+RZHYHUXVLQJWKHUHSRUWHGELOOLRQDQGDVVXPLQJDSSUR[LPDWHO\
RIORFDOSURSHUW\WD[UHYHQXHVDUHDOORFDWHGWRVFKRROVWKLVELOOZRXOGUHVXOWLQDRQHWLPHORVVWRWKH*HQHUDO)XQG
RIDVPXFKDVPLOOLRQ
7KH*RYHUQRU
V%XGJHWGRHVQRWDVVXPHWKDWWKHVHIXQGVZRXOGIORZWRVFKRROVVRHQDFWPHQWRI
WKLVOHJLVODWLRQZRXOGQRWUHVXOWLQDZLGHQLQJRIWKHHVWLPDWHGEXGJHWGHILFLW+RZHYHUHQDFWPHQWZRXOGSUHYHQW
WKHVWDWHIURPJDLQLQJDGGLWLRQDOEXGJHWVDYLQJVIURPSURSHUW\WD[SD\PHQWVWRVFKRROV
7KLVELOOFKDQJHVWKHGHILQLWLRQVRIDOORZDEOHFRVWVIRUDGPLQLVWUDWLYHSXUSRVHVDQGRIHQIRUFHDEOHREOLJDWLRQV
ZKLFKDUHFRPPLWPHQWVWKDW5'$VOHJLWLPDWHO\PDGHSULRUWRWKHLUHOLPLQDWLRQ%HFDXVHRIWKHVHDPHQGPHQWV
WKHUHDUHOLNHO\WREHJUHDWHUORFDOFRVWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHDIIDLUVRIWKHGLVVROYHGUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQFLHVFRVWV
WKDWFDQEHUHLPEXUVHGRUSDLGIRURXWRIDVVHWVRUIXQGVWKDWZRXOGRWKHUZLVHEHUHGLVWULEXWHGWRRWKHUORFDO
DJHQFLHVLQFOXGLQJVFKRROV7KHVHFRVWVDUHXQNQRZQDQGRIVLJQLILFDQWO\VPDOOHUPDJQLWXGHWKDQWKHUHWDLQHG
/ 0KRXVLQJIXQGVEXWFRXOGUHDFKPLOOLRQVRIGROODUV
7KHILVFDOHIIHFWVRIWKHDGGLWLRQDOELOOVLQFOXGHGLQWKHVWDIIUHSRUWDUHXQNQRZQDWWKLVWLPH+RZHYHUDOORFDWLQJ
IRUPHU5'$V
DVVHWVLVD]HURVXPJDPHHYHU\UHDOORFDWLRQFUHDWHVZLQQHUVDQGORVHUV$OORZLQJVXFFHVVRU
DJHQFLHVWRVSHQGDGGLWLRQDOERQGSURFHHGVRQSURMHFWVUDWKHUWKDQRQUHWLULQJRXWVWDQGLQJGHEWVZRXOGJUDQWD
ODUJHUVKDUHRIIRUPHU5'$DVVHWVWRVXFFHVVRUDJHQFLHVDQGDVPDOOHUVKDUHWRRWKHUORFDOJRYHUQPHQWV
LQFOXGLQJVFKRROGLVWULFWVWKDQWKH\ZRXOGUHFHLYHXQGHUFXUUHQWODZ
%$&.*5281'
2Q)HEUXDU\5HGHYHORSPHQW$JHQFLHV5'$VLQ&DOLIRUQLDZHUHGLVVROYHGDQGWKHSURFHVVWRXQZLQG
WKHLUILQDQFLDODIIDLUVVKLIWHGELOOLRQVRIGROODUVLQSURSHUW\WD[UHYHQXHIURP5'$VWRORFDOWD[LQJHQWLWLHVLQDQ
HIIRUWWRUHGXFHWKH6WDWH¶VJHQHUDOIXQGREOLJDWLRQVDQGWRVXSSOHPHQWWKHIXQGLQJRIVSHFLDOGLVWULFWV
3ULRUWRWKHLUGLVVROXWLRQ5'$VDQQXDOO\UHFHLYHGFORVHWRELOOLRQLQSURSHUW\WD[UHYHQXHVDQGVSHQWWHQVRI
ELOOLRQVRIGROODUVRIRXWVWDQGLQJERQGVFRQWUDFWXDODJUHHPHQWVDQGORDQVLQUHGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWDUHDV
WKURXJKRXW&DOLIRUQLD
6LQFHWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRI$%[WKH'LVVROXWLRQ$FW5'$VVWDWHZLGHKDYHEHJXQWKHSURFHVVRI
XQZLQGLQJIRUPHUUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQFLHVHYHQWKRXJKH[LVWLQJVWDWXHVLQFOXGHPDQ\XQFHUWDLQWLHVZLWK
GLVVROYLQJ5'$V&ODULILFDWLRQLVQHHGHGRQPDQ\DUHDVVXFKDVWKHXVHRIXQHQFXPEHUHGDQGRUXQVSHQWKRXVLQJ
IXQGVDQGXVHRIXQHQFXPEHUHGWD[H[HPSWDQGWD[DEOHERQGSURFHHGV6HYHUDOELOOVVSRQVRUHGE\YDULRXV
OHJLVODWRUVDWWHPSWWRFOHDQ±XSWKHVHJUD\DUHDV7KH\LQFOXGHWKHIROORZLQJELOOVZKLFKZHUHFRQVLGHUHGE\WKH
&RQWUD&RVWD&RXQW\%RDUGRI6XSHUYLVRUV
/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHHDWWKHLU$SULOPHHWLQJ
$%3HUH]5HGHYHORSPHQW
:KHQWKH/HJLVODWXUHYRWHGRQ$%;DQG$%;LWHQYLVLRQHGWKDWDPDMRULW\RIUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQFLHV
ZRXOGOLNHO\FKRRVHWRRSWLQWRWKHYROXQWDU\SURJUDPOHDYLQJWKHVWDWHWRRYHUVHHWKHGLVVROXWLRQRIRQO\D
KDQGIXORIDJHQFLHV%HFDXVHRIWKHVXEVHTXHQWODZVXLWVDQGWKH&RXUW
VUXOLQJRYHU5'$VDUHQRZUHTXLUHG
WRGLVVROYH7KHGLVVROXWLRQSURFHVVKDVUDLVHGVRPHTXHVWLRQVDQGFRQFHUQVUHJDUGLQJWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRI$%
;$%LVDUHVSRQVHWRWKRVHFRQFHUQVDQGDWWHPSWVWRIDFLOLWDWHDVPRRWKZLQGGRZQRIUHGHYHORSPHQW
DJHQFLHV7KLVELOOPDNHVDYDULHW\RIWHFKQLFDOFKDQJHVWKDWDUHLQWHQGHGWRHDVHWKHSURFHVVRIGLVVROXWLRQDQG
SURYLGHJUHDWHUGLUHFWLRQWRWKHVXFFHVVRUDJHQFLHVRYHUVLJKWERDUGVDQGVXFFHVVRUKRXVLQJHQWLWLHVWKDWDUH
LQWHJUDOWRWKHGLVVROXWLRQSURFHVV,WDOVRUHTXLUHVWKDWWKH/RZDQG0RGHUDWH,QFRPH+RXVLQJ)XQGV/ 0
IXQGVWKDWKDYHEHHQGHSRVLWHGE\IRUPHU5'$VFRQWLQXHWREHXVHGIRUDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJLQWKHFRXQW\LQ
ZKLFKWKH\ZHUHFROOHFWHG
$%PDNHVVHYHUDOVLJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVWRWKHSURYLVLRQVLQ$%;UHJDUGLQJ/ 0IXQGV
.HHSVWKHPRQH\RQGHSRVLWLQDQ/ 0)XQGZLWKWKHVXFFHHGLQJKRXVLQJHQWLW\WREHVSHQWRQDFWLYLWLHV
DOORZHGXQGHUWKHKRXVLQJSURYLVLRQVLQWKH&RPPXQLW\5HGHYHORSPHQW/DZRULIWKHUHLVQRVXFFHHGLQJ
KRXVLQJHQWLW\UHTXLUHVWKHIXQGVWREHWUDQVIHUUHGWR+&'
5HTXLUHVWKHVXFFHHGLQJKRXVLQJHQWLW\WRH[SHQGRUHQFXPEHURIWKHIXQGVZLWKLQIRXU\HDUVEXWJLYHVLW
WKHRSWLRQWRSHWLWLRQ+&'IRUPRUHWLPHWRVSHQGWKHIXQGV
'HVLJQDWHVWKHW\SHVRIDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJSURMHFWVWKDW+&'FDQIXQGIURPPRQLHVWKDWDUHWUDQVIHUUHGWRWKH
GHSDUWPHQWIURPMXULVGLFWLRQVWKDWGHFLGHQRWWRNHHSWKHKRXVLQJIXQFWLRQVRIWKHIRUPHU5'$
$XWKRUL]HVWKHWUDQVIHURIWKH/ 0)XQGVEHWZHHQMXULVGLFWLRQVZLWKLQWKHFRXQW\LIFHUWDLQFRQGLWLRQVDUHPHW
$%;VSHFLILHVWKDWH[FHSWIRUORDQDJUHHPHQWVPDGHZLWKLQWKHILUVWWZR\HDUVRIWKHOLIHRIWKHDJHQF\RU
ORDQVWKDWUHODWHWRLVVXHGVHFXULWLHVLWGRHVQRWUHFRJQL]HRWKHULQWHUDJHQF\ORDQVWREHHQIRUFHDEOHREOLJDWLRQV
,QVWHDGLWHIIHFWLYHO\WUHDWVWKHPDVFRQWULEXWLRQVRIIXQGV$%DGGVWKHIROORZLQJWRZKDWFDQEHFRQVLGHUHG
DQHQIRUFHDEOHREOLJDWLRQORDQDJUHHPHQWVEHWZHHQWKHIRUPHU5'$DQGWKHFLW\FRXQW\RUFLW\DQGFRXQW\
WKDWFUHDWHGLWPDGHZLWKLQWZR\HDUVRIWKHGDWHRIWKHFUHDWLRQRIDSURMHFWDUHDLIWKHORDQZDVIRUWKHSURMHFW
DUHDORDQVPDGHIURPWKHFLW\RUFRXQW\WRWKHIRUPHU5'$WRPDNHDSD\PHQWWR6(5$)DQGRWKHUORDQV
VXEMHFWWRRYHUVLJKWERDUGILQGLQJ
$%;SURYLGHVWKDWWKHOLDELOLW\RIWKHVXFFHVVRUDJHQF\RQO\H[WHQGVDVIDUDVWKHPRQH\DYDLODEOHIURPWD[
LQFUHPHQWDQGIRUPHUDVVHWVRIWKHDJHQF\ZLOOIXQG$%IXUWKHUFODULILHVWKDWWKHVXFFHVVRUDJHQF\LVD
SXEOLFHQWLW\WKDWLVVHSDUDWHIURPWKHHQWLW\RUHQWLWLHVWKDWDXWKRUL]HGWKHFUHDWLRQRIWKHUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQF\
WKDWDFWVE\UHVROXWLRQFDQVXHDQGEHVXHGDQGFDQKDYHDGGLWLRQDOSRZHUVWKDWPD\EHFRQIHUUHGXSRQLW
5HODWHGOHJLVODWLRQ6%6WHLQEHUJZRXOGUHYLVHWKHGHILQLWLRQRIHQIRUFHDEOHREOLJDWLRQWRLQFOXGHDPRXQWV
RQGHSRVLWLQWKH/RZDQG0RGHUDWH,QFRPH+RXVLQJ)XQGRIIRUPHU5'$V
7KH$VVHPEO\/RFDO*RYHUQPHQW&RPPLWWHHSDVVHG$%DWLWVKHDULQJRQ:HGQHVGD\0DUFK7KH
$VVHPEO\$SSURSULDWLRQV&RPPLWWHHDOVRSDVVHGWKHELOODWDVSHFLDOPHHWLQJRQ7KXUVGD\0DUFK7KH
ELOOKDVEHHQDVVLJQHGWRWKH6HQDWH*RYHUQDQFHDQG)LQDQFH&RPPLWWHHEXWQRKHDULQJGDWHKDVEHHQVHW7KLV
ELOOFRQWDLQVDQXUJHQF\FODXVHUHTXLULQJDUGYRWHIRUDSSURYDO
/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ6833257DQGUHTXHVWDPHQGPHQWWR$%
$PHQGPHQW5HTXHVWHG6HFWLRQLDOORZVERQGIXQGVWREHXVHGIRUWKHSXUSRVHVIRUZKLFKERQGVZHUHVROG
XQOHVVWKHSXUSRVHVFDQQRORQJHUEHDFKLHYHGLQZKLFKFDVHWKHSURFHHGVPD\EHXVHGWRGHIHDVHWKHERQGV
6HHNDQDPHQGPHQWWRFODULI\WKDWVXFFHVVRUDJHQFLHVFDQHQWHULQWRQHZRUDPHQGHGFRQWUDFWVIRUSURMHFWVWKDWDUH
IXQGHGE\ERQGVSURFHHGVDQGDFFRPSOLVKWKHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFKWKHERQGVZHUHVROG
6%6WHLQEHUJ5HGHYHORSPHQW
7KHLQWHQWRI6%LVWRSHUPLWXQHQFXPEHUHGIXQGEDODQFHVIURPDJHQFLHV¶ORZDQGPRGHUDWHKRXVLQJIXQGVWR
EHWUDQVIHUUHGWRWKHKRXVLQJVXFFHVVRURIWKHGLVVROYHGUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQF\IRUH[SHQGLWXUHRIWKRVHIXQGVIRU
WKHRULJLQDOLQWHQWRISURYLGLQJIXQGLQJIRUORZDQGPRGHUDWHLQFRPHKRXVLQJLQDPDQQHUFRQVLVWHQWZLWK
&RPPXQLW\5HGHYHORSPHQW/DZ7KLVLVDOVRLQFOXGHGLQ6%
',6326,7,213HQGLQJ
/2&$7,21$VVHPEO\+RXVLQJDQG&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW&RPPLWWHH
/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ68332576%
6%6WHLQEHUJ/RQJ5DQJH$VVHW0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
6%SHUPLWVORFDOMXULVGLFWLRQVWRXVHDQDOWHUQDWLYHSURFHVVWRDGPLQLVWHUWKHDVVHWVRIWKHLUIRUPHU
UHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQFLHVIRUHFRQRPLFGHYHORSPHQWDQGKRXVLQJSXUSRVHV7RGRVRWKHELOODXWKRUL]HVD
&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQWDQG+RXVLQJ-RLQW3RZHUV$XWKRULW\WRSODFHUHGHYHORSPHQWDVVHWVLQD6XVWDLQDEOH
(FRQRPLF'HYHORSPHQWDQG+RXVLQJ7UXVW)XQGDQGUHTXLUHVDORQJUDQJHDVVHWPDQDJHPHQWSODQWRJRYHUQWKDW
WUXVWIXQG
6%UHTXLUHVVXFFHVVRUDJHQFLHVWRSUHSDUHDORQJUDQJHDVVHWPDQDJHPHQWSODQZKLFKRXWOLQHVDVWUDWHJ\IRU
PD[LPL]LQJYDOXHRIUHDOSURSHUW\DQGDVVHWVIRURQJRLQJHFRQRPLFGHYHORSPHQWDQGKRXVLQJIXQFWLRQV,I
DSSURYHGVXFFHVVRUDJHQFLHVZRXOGKDYHWRFRPSOHWHDQGVXEPLWWKHSODQE\'HFHPEHU$VVHWVFRXOGQRW
EHVROGXQWLOWKHSODQLVSUHSDUHG6RPHKDYHFDOOHGWKLVWKH³$QWL)LUH6DOH´ELOO
$FFRUGLQJWR&6$&DQDO\VLV6%DQG6%E\6HQDWH3UHVLGHQW3UR7HP'DUUHOO6WHLQEHUJZRXOG
FUHDWHDVWUXFWXUHIRUFRQWLQXLQJUHGHYHORSPHQWDFWLYLWLHVLQWKHIRUPRIFRXQW\FLW\MRLQWSRZHUVDXWKRULWLHV
7KHIRXQGDWLRQRI&6$&¶VVXSSRUWLQFRQFHSWIRUWKHELOOSDFNDJHLVWKDWFRXQWLHVZRXOGKDYHDQRSWLRQZKHWKHU
WRILQDQFLDOO\SDUWLFLSDWHLQD&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQWDQG+RXVLQJ-RLQW3RZHUV$XWKRULW\7KHDSSURDFK
RXWOLQHGLQWKHELOOSDFNDJHHQFRXUDJHVDFROODERUDWLYHSDUWQHUVKLSEHWZHHQORFDOJRYHUQPHQWVWRMRLQWO\JRYHUQ
DQGXWLOL]HYDULRXVILQDQFLQJWRROVIRUPHUO\DIIRUGHGUHGHYHORSPHQWDJHQFLHVWRSURYLGHHFRQRPLFGHYHORSPHQW
WKDWDOVRIRFXVHVRQWKHSXEOLFJRRG&RXQWLHVSURYLGHQXPHURXVSURJUDPVRQEHKDOIRIWKHVWDWHHVSHFLDOO\DIWHU
WKHUHFHQWUHDOLJQPHQWDQGDUHWKHOHYHORIJRYHUQPHQWUHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHJHQHUDOKHDOWKDQGZHOIDUHRIDOOWKH
VWDWH¶VUHVLGHQWV
:KLOH&6$&VXSSRUWVHFRQRPLFGHYHORSPHQWFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH6%JRDOVDVDOORZHGE\WKHWZRELOOVDV
FXUUHQWO\GUDIWHG&6$&ZRXOGVXSSRUWERWKDQH[SDQVLRQRIWKHSURMHFWDUHDGHILQLWLRQDQGWKHOLVWRIHOLJLEOHXVHV
FXUUHQWO\RXWOLQHGLQWKHELOOVLQRUGHUWRVXSSRUWWKHP\ULDGRISXEOLFVDIHW\DQGKHDOWKDQGKXPDQVHUYLFHVWKDW
FRXQWLHVSURYLGHRQEHKDOIRIWKHVWDWH&6$&HQYLVLRQVDQHZVWUXFWXUHIRUFRPPXQLW\GHYHORSPHQWDQG
DIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJWKDWJLYHVFRXQWLHVDQGFLWLHVZRUNLQJWRJHWKHUWKHSRZHUWRERWKVSXUHFRQRPLFGHYHORSPHQW
DQGDWWKHVDPHWLPHSURYLGHWKHSXEOLFLQIUDVWUXFWXUHWKDWFDQKHOSHQVXUHWKHFRPPXQLW\¶VVXFFHVV7KLV
LQIUDVWUXFWXUHFRXOGLQFOXGHWUDQVLWLRQDOKRXVLQJIRUSHRSOHHQWHULQJRUUHHQWHULQJWKHZRUNIRUFHDIWHULQFDUFHUDWLRQ
RUDFKLOGKRRGVSHQWLQWKHIRVWHUV\VWHPDVZHOODVRWKHUVZKRQHHGWUDQVLWLRQDODQGVXSSRUWLYHKRXVLQJ,WFRXOG
LQFOXGHWKHFKLOGFDUHIDFLOLWLHVWKDWDOORZSDUHQWVWRZRUNRUWKHFOLQLFVWKDWNHHSWKRVHKRXVHGORFDOO\KHDOWK\
ZRUNLQJDQGRXWRIHPHUJHQF\URRPV6RPHUXUDODQGGLVDGYDQWDJHGFRPPXQLWLHVQHHGXSJUDGHGLQIUDVWUXFWXUH
WRVLPSO\PHHWKHDOWKDQGVDIHW\VWDQGDUGV
7KH6HQDWH*RYHUQDQFHDQG)LQDQFH&RPPLWWHHSDVVHG6%DQGDWLWVKHDULQJRQ:HGQHVGD\$SULO
',6326,7,213HQGLQJ
/2&$7,216HQDWH$SSURSULDWLRQV&RPPLWWHH
/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ68332576%LIDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHIXQGLQJWRSUHSDUHSODQ
&RQWLQXHWRPRQLWRU6%
6%'XWWRQ5HGHYHORSPHQW%RQG3URFHHGV
6%ZRXOGSHUPLWXQHQFXPEHUHGERQGSURFHHGVIRUWD[H[HPSWERQGVLVVXHGSULRUWR'HFHPEHUWR
EHUHWDLQHGDQGH[SHQGHGIRUWKHRULJLQDOLQWHQWLQZKLFKWKHERQGVZHUHLVVXHGSXUVXDQWWRDQHQIRUFHDEOH
REOLJDWLRQHQWHUHGLQWRE\WKHGLVVROYHGDJHQF\SULRUWR'HFHPEHURUE\WKHVXFFHVVRUDJHQF\SULRUWR
'HFHPEHU7D[H[HPSWERQGSURFHHGVQRWFRPPLWWHGE\-DQXDU\PXVWEHXVHGWRHLWKHUGHIHDVH
WKHERQGVRUSXUFKDVHERQGVRQWKHRSHQPDUNHWIRUFDQFHOODWLRQ7KHELOOLVVLOHQWRQWKHXVHRIWD[DEOHERQG
SURFHHGVLPSO\LQJWKDWXQHQFXPEHUHGWD[DEOHERQGSURFHHGVPXVWEHUHPLWWHGWRWKHFRXQW\DXGLWRUFRQWUROOHU
IRUGLVWULEXWLRQXQGHUWKH'LVVROXWLRQ$FW8QGHUH[LVWLQJODZDJHQFLHVPD\KDYHWKHDELOLW\WRUHWDLQ
XQHQFXPEHUHGERQGSURFHHGVIURPWD[DEOHERQGV
',6326,7,213HQGLQJ
&200,77((6HQDWH$SSURSULDWLRQV&RPPLWWHH
+($5,1*DP%XUWRQ+HDULQJ5RRP
/HJLVODWLRQ&RPPLWWHH5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ68332576%
&216(48(1&(2)1(*$7,9($&7,21
,IWKH%RDUGGRHVQRWDGRSWSRVLWLRQVRQELOOVWKHUHZLOOEHQRRIILFLDOSROLF\SRVLWLRQRQZKLFKWRDGYRFDWH
&/(5.
6$''(1'80
6SHDNHUV/HH/DZUHQFH/HDJXHRI:RPHQ9RWHUVRI'LDEOR9DOOH\
$77$&+0(176
%LOO7H[WDQG$QDO\VHV
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 21, 2012
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 15, 2012
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 8, 2012
california legislature—2011–12 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1585
1
2
Introduced by Assembly Members John A. Pérez, Atkins, Dickinson,
Hill, Mitchell, Perea, and Torres
February 2, 2012
1
2
3
4
An act to amend Sections 34171, 34173, 34176, 34177, 34179, 34180,
34181, 34182, 34183, 34187, and 34189 of the Health and Safety Code,
relating to redevelopment, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take
effect immediately.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 1585, as amended, John A. Pérez. Redevelopment.
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community
development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the
designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires
successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved
redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, repay enforceable
obligations, as defined, and to remit unencumbered balances of
redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county
auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities.
Existing law authorizes the city, county, or city and county that
authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency to retain the housing
assets, functions, and powers previously performed by the
redevelopment agency, excluding amounts on deposit in the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund.
96
This bill would modify the scope of the term “enforceable obligation”
and modify provisions relating to the transfer of housing funds and
responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The
bill would provide that any amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate
Income Housing Fund of a dissolved redevelopment agency be
transferred to specified entities. The bill would make conforming
changes.
Existing law provides that, upon a specified date, agreements,
contracts, or arrangements between the city or county, or city and county
that created the redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency
are invalid. Notwithstanding this provision, an agreement that provided
loans or other startup funds for the agency that was entered into within
2 years of the formation of the agency is valid and binds the successor
agency.
The bill would expand this exception to include an agreement
involving a loan specific to a project area and other specified obligations.
The bill would provide that other loan agreements entered into between
the redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that
created it are deemed to be enforceable obligations, except as specified.
The bill would further expand upon, and clarify, the scope of the
successor agency’s and the oversight board’s responsibilities.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an
urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SECTION 1. Section 34171 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34171. The following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) “Administrative budget” means the budget for administrative
costs of the successor agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b) “Administrative cost allowance” means an amount that,
subject to the approval of the oversight board, is payable from
property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the property tax
allocated to the former redevelopment agency and successor agency
for the 2011–12 fiscal year and up to 3 percent of the property tax
allocated to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund money
that is allocated to the successor agency for each fiscal year
96
— 2 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
thereafter, except as provided by subdivision (l) of Section 34180;
provided, however, that the amount shall not be less than two
hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for any fiscal year or
such lesser amount as agreed to by the successor agency. However,
the allowance amount shall exclude any administrative costs that
can be paid from bond proceeds or from sources other than property
tax. Employee costs associated with work on specific project
implementation activities, including, but not limited to, construction
inspection, project management, or actual construction, shall be
considered project-specific costs and are not administrative costs.
(c) “Designated local authority” shall mean a public entity
formed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d) (1) “Enforceable obligation” means any of the following:
(A) Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued
pursuant to Section 5850 of the Government Code, including the
required annual debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other
payments required under the indenture or similar documents
governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former
redevelopment agency.
(B) Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency
for a lawful purpose, to the extent they are legally required to be
repaid pursuant to a required repayment schedule or other
mandatory loan terms.
(C) Payments required by the federal government, preexisting
obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law, other
than passthrough payments that are made by the county
auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable
payments required in connection with the agencies’ employees,
including, but not limited to, pension payments, pension obligation
debt service, unemployment payments, or other obligations
conferred through a collective bargaining agreement. Costs incurred
to fulfill collective bargaining agreements for layoffs or
terminations of city employees who performed work directly on
behalf of the former redevelopment agency shall be considered
enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds. The
obligations to employees specified in this subparagraph shall
remain enforceable obligations payable from property tax funds
for any employee to whom those obligations apply if that employee
is transferred to the entity assuming the housing functions of the
former redevelopment agency pursuant to Section 34176. The
96
AB 1585
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
successor agency or designated local authority shall enter into an
agreement with the housing entity to reimburse it for any costs of
the employee obligations.
(D) Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of
law or binding arbitration decisions against the former
redevelopment agency, other than passthrough payments that are
made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183.
Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have
the authority and standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside
any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E) Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract
that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public
policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit either the
successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the
oversight board, or the oversight board itself from terminating any
existing agreements or contracts and providing any necessary and
required compensation or remediation for such termination.
(F) Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or
operation of the successor agency, in accordance with this part,
including, but not limited to, agreements to purchase or rent office
space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses pursuant
to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section
33134.
(G) Amounts borrowed from or payments owing to the Low
and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency,
which had been deferred as of the effective date of the act adding
this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is
approved by the oversight board. Repayments shall be made to
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund maintained by the
entity assuming the housing functions formerly performed by the
redevelopment agency, as described in Section 34176.
(2) (A) Except as specifically provided in this part, “enforceable
obligation” does not include any agreements, contracts, or
arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that
created the redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment
agency. However, written agreements entered into (i) at the time
of issuance, but in no event later than December 31, 2010, of
indebtedness obligations, and (ii) solely for the purpose of securing
or repaying those indebtedness obligations may be deemed
enforceable obligations for purposes of this part.
96
— 4 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(B) Loan agreements entered into between the redevelopment
agency and the city, county, or city and county that created it,
within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment
agency, or within two years of the date of the creation of a project
area if the loan is specific to that project area, and any obligations
imposed by paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 33691 may
be deemed to be enforceable obligations.
(C) Other loan agreements entered into between the
redevelopment agency and the city, county, or city and county that
created it shall be deemed to be enforceable obligations, if the
conditions of subdivision (k) of Section 34180 are met.
(3) Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment
agency and other public agencies, to perform services or provide
funding for governmental or private services or capital projects
outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide benefit
to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized
under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed
void on the effective date of this part; provided, however, that such
contracts or agreements for the provision of housing properly
authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall
not be deemed void.
(e) “Indebtedness obligations” means bonds, notes, certificates
of participation, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued or
delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by a joint exercise of
powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to
third-party investors or bondholders to finance or refinance
redevelopment projects undertaken by the redevelopment agency
in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1
(commencing with Section 33000)).
(f) “Oversight board” shall mean each entity established pursuant
to Section 34179.
(g) “Recognized obligation” means an obligation listed in the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h) “Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule” means the
document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due
dates of payments required by enforceable obligations for each
six-month fiscal period or annual period as provided in subdivision
(l) of Section 34177.
(i) “School entity” means any entity defined as such in
subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
96
AB 1585
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(j) “Successor agency” means the county, city, or city and county
that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency acting
in its separate capacity as a successor agency or another entity as
provided in Section 34173.
(k) “Taxing entities” means cities, counties, a city and county,
special districts, and school entities, as defined in subdivision (f)
of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that receive
passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant
to the provisions of this part.
SEC. 2. Section 34173 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34173. (a) Successor agencies, as defined in this part, are
hereby designated as successor entities to the former redevelopment
agencies.A successor agency shall constitute a legally distinct and
separate body For purposes of this part, a successor agency is a
public entity separate from the entity or entities that authorized
the creation of each redevelopment agency that acts, by resolution,
on its own behalf and shall have all the powers and duties set forth
herein, the power to sue and be sued, and such additional powers
as may be conferred upon it. Each successor agency shall be
deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown
Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of
Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code).
(b) Except for those provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law that are repealed, restricted, or revised
pursuant to the act adding this part, all authority, rights, powers,
duties, and obligations previously vested with the former
redevelopment agencies, under the Community Redevelopment
Law, are hereby vested in the successor agencies.
(c) (1) Where the redevelopment agency was in the form of a
joint powers authority, and where the joint powers agreement
governing the formation of the joint powers authority addresses
the allocation of assets and liabilities upon dissolution of the joint
powers authority, then each of the entities that created the former
redevelopment agency may be a successor agency within the
meaning of this part and each shall have a share of assets and
liabilities based on the provisions of the joint powers agreement.
(2) Where the redevelopment agency was in the form of a joint
powers authority, and where the joint powers agreement governing
the formation of the joint powers authority does not address the
96
— 6 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
allocation of assets and liabilities upon dissolution of the joint
powers authority, then each of the entities that created the former
redevelopment agency may be a successor agency within the
meaning of this part, a proportionate share of the assets and
liabilities shall be based on the assessed value in the project areas
within each entity’s jurisdiction, as determined by the county
assessor, in its jurisdiction as compared to the assessed value of
land within the boundaries of the project areas of the former
redevelopment agency.
(d) (1) A city, county, city and county, or the entities forming
the joint powers authority that authorized the creation of each
redevelopment agency may elect not to serve as a successor agency
under this part. A city, county, city and county, or any member of
a joint powers authority that elects not to serve as a successor
agency under this part must file a copy of a duly authorized
resolution of its governing board to that effect with the county
auditor-controller no later than January 13, 2012.
(2) The determination of the first local agency that elects to
become the successor agency shall be made by the county
auditor-controller based on the earliest receipt by the county
auditor-controller of a copy of a duly adopted resolution of the
local agency’s governing board authorizing such an election. As
used in this section, “local agency” means any city, county, city
and county, or special district in the county of the former
redevelopment agency.
(3) If no local agency elects to serve as a successor agency for
a dissolved redevelopment agency, a public body, referred to herein
as a “designated local authority” shall be immediately formed,
pursuant to this part, in the county and shall be vested with all the
powers and duties of a successor agency as described in this part.
The Governor shall appoint three residents of the county to serve
as the governing board of the authority. The designated local
authority shall serve as successor agency until a local agency elects
to become the successor agency in accordance with this section.
(4) A city, county, or city and county, or the entities forming
the joint powers authority that authorized the creation of a
redevelopment agency and that elected not to serve as the successor
agency under this part, may subsequently reverse this decision and
agree to serve as the successor agency pursuant to this section.
Any reversal of this decision shall not become effective for 60 days
96
AB 1585
— 7 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
after notice has been given to the current successor agency and
the oversight board and shall not invalidate any action of the
successor agency or oversight board taken prior to the effective
date of the transfer of responsibility.
(e) The liability of any successor agency, acting pursuant to the
powers granted under the act adding this part, shall be limited to
the extent of the total sum of property tax revenues it receives
pursuant to this part and the value of assets transferred to it as a
successor agency for a dissolved redevelopment agency.
SEC. 3. Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34176. (a) The city, county, or city and county that authorized
the creation of a redevelopment agency may elect to retain the
housing assets and functions previously performed by the
redevelopment agency. If a city, county, or city and county elects
to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions
previously performed by a redevelopment agency, all rights,
powers, duties, and obligations assets, liabilities, duties, and
obligations, excluding enforceable obligations of the successor
agency, associated with the housing activities of the agency,
including any amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund, shall be transferred to the city, county, or city and
county. Any funds transferred to the city, county, or city and county
pursuant to this subdivision shall be maintained in a separate Low
and Moderate Income Housing Fund and expended pursuant to
the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law relating to
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(b) If a city, county, or city and county does not elect to retain
the responsibility for performing housing functions previously
performed by a redevelopment agency, all rights, powers, assets,
liabilities, duties, and obligations, excluding enforceable
obligations of the successor agency, associated with the housing
activities of the agency, including any amounts in the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund, shall be transferred as follows:
(1) Where there is one local housing authority in the territorial
jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, to that local
housing authority.
(2) Where there is more than one local housing authority in the
territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, to the
96
— 8 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
local housing authority selected by the city, county, or city and
county that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency.
(3) Where there is no local housing authority in the territorial
jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency or where the local
housing authority selected does not accept the responsibility for
performing housing functions previously performed by the former
redevelopment agency, to the Department of Housing and
Community Development. Funds shall be deposited into the State
Low and Moderate Income Housing Trust Fund and awarded on
a competitive basis to projects within the counties in which the
funds were collected. Priority shall be given to eligible projects
for extremely low, very low, and low-income projects.
(c) Commencing on the operative date of this part, the entity
assuming the housing functions formerly performed by the
redevelopment agency shall enforce affordability covenants and
perform related activities pursuant to applicable provisions of the
Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with
Section 33000), including, but not limited to, Section 33418.
(d) The succeeding housing entity shall contract to expend at
least 80 percent of the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund within two years of the date of receipt of those
moneys. If within four years of the date of receipt of those moneys
the succeeding housing entity has not spent the money in the Low
and Moderate Income Housing Fund, then the excess amount,
minus the amount necessarily reserved for the ongoing monitoring
and maintenance of affordable housing projects, shall be transferred
to the State Low and Moderate Income Housing Trust Fund, which
is hereby created, for expenditure by the Department of Housing
and Community Development for the purpose of increasing the
supply of low- and moderate-income housing in the county with
priority given to extremely low, very low, and low-income projects.
Excess funds shall not be transferred to the department if the
succeeding housing entity applies for, and receives, a waiver from
the department. If a waiver is granted, funds shall remain with the
entity for an additional two years from the date of waiver approval.
In approving a waiver, the department shall consider, among other
factors, whether the city, county, or city and county, or housing
authority has a site specific project plan with local approvals,
including the issuance of building permits, whether the project has
secured financing, and evidence that some funds have been
96
AB 1585
— 9 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
expended from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. A
succeeding housing entity may reapply at the end of the two-year
period for a renewal of the previously granted waiver.
(e) A succeeding housing entity may transfer all or a portion of
the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to
another succeeding housing entity within the county where the
moneys were collected, to be spent on affordable housing if all of
the following conditions are met:
(1) The funds shall be spent on projects that primarily benefit
low-income families or families that are below low income.
(2) Both succeeding housing entities involved in the transfer
adopt a resolution detailing the need for the transfer of funds and
the intended use of the funds by the receiving jurisdiction.
(3) The funds shall be spent in compliance with subdivision (d).
(f) The succeeding housing entity shall, within 45 days of the
date the act amending this section takes effect or 45 days from
receipt of moneys for the Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund, whichever date is later, notify the department of the amount
of moneys on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund and that entity’s plan for spending the funds. Two years from
this date, the succeeding housing entity shall report to the
department the percentage of funds that it has entered into contract
to spend. Within four years of receipt of the funds, the succeeding
housing entity shall report to the department if there are remaining
moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and if it
will apply for a waiver specified in subdivision (d) or whether the
excess amount will be transferred to the department.
(g) For purposes of this section, “succeeding housing entity”
means the entity that assumes responsibility for retaining the
housing assets and functions previously performed by a
redevelopment agency, as described in subdivisions (a) and (b).
SEC. 4. Section 34177 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34177. Successor agencies are required to do all of the
following:
(a) Continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations.
(1) On and after February 1, 2012, and until a Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule becomes operative, only payments
required pursuant to an enforceable obligations payment schedule
shall be made. The initial enforceable obligation payment schedule
96
— 10 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
shall be the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency
under Section 34169. However, payments associated with
obligations excluded from the definition of enforceable obligations
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 34171 shall be
excluded from the enforceable obligations payment schedule and
be removed from the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment
agency under Section 34169 prior to the successor agency adopting
it as its enforceable obligations payment schedule pursuant to this
subdivision. The enforceable obligation payment schedule may
be amended by the successor agency at any public meeting and
shall be subject to the approval of the oversight board as soon as
the board has sufficient members to form a quorum.
(2) The Department of Finance and the Controller shall each
have the authority to require any documents associated with the
enforceable obligations to be provided to them in a manner of their
choosing. Any taxing entity, the department, and the Controller
shall each have standing to file a judicial action to prevent a
violation under this part and to obtain injunctive or other
appropriate relief.
(3) Commencing on the date the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is valid pursuant to subdivision (l), only those payments
listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule may be
made by the successor agency from the funds specified in the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule. In addition,
commencing on the date the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is valid pursuant to subdivision (l), the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall supersede the Statement of
Indebtedness, which shall no longer be prepared nor have any
effect under the Community Redevelopment Law.
(4) Nothing in the act adding this part is to be construed as
preventing a successor agency, with the prior approval of the
oversight board, as described in Section 34179, from making
payments for enforceable obligations from sources other than those
listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(5) From February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, a successor agency
shall have no authority and is hereby prohibited from accelerating
payment or making any lump-sum payments that are intended to
prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required
prior to the effective date of this part.
96
AB 1585
— 11 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(b) Maintain reserves in the amount required by indentures,
trust indentures, or similar documents governing the issuance of
outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(c) Perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable
obligation.
(d) Remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency
funds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing
entities. In making the distribution, the county auditor-controller
shall utilize the same methodology for allocation and distribution
of property tax revenues provided in Section 34188.
(e) Dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment
agency as directed by the oversight board; provided, however, that
the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to
transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 34181. The disposal is to be done in an expeditious but
orderly manner that preserves the value of the asset. Proceeds from
asset sales and related funds that are no longer needed for approved
development projects or to otherwise wind down the affairs of the
agency, each as determined by the oversight board, shall be
transferred to the county auditor-controller for distribution as
property tax proceeds under Section 34188.
(f) Enforce all former redevelopment agency rights for the
benefit of the taxing entities, including, but not limited to,
continuing to collect loans, rents, and other revenues that were due
to the redevelopment agency.
(g) Effectuate transfer of housing functions and assets to the
appropriate entity designated pursuant to Section 34176.
(h) Expeditiously wind down the affairs of the redevelopment
agency pursuant to the provisions of this part and in accordance
with the direction of the oversight board.
(i) Continue to oversee development of properties until the
contracted work has been completed or the contractual obligations
of the former redevelopment agency can be transferred to other
parties. Bond proceeds shall be used for the purposes for which
bonds were sold unless the purposes can no longer be achieved,
in which case, the proceeds may be used to defease the bonds.
(j) Prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to
the oversight board for its approval. The proposed administrative
budget shall include all of the following:
96
— 12 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(1) Estimated amounts for successor agency administrative costs
for the upcoming six-month fiscal period.
(2) Proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in
paragraph (1).
(3) Proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations
services provided by a city, county, city and county, or other entity.
(k) Provide administrative cost estimates, from its approved
administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues
deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the
county auditor-controller for each six-month fiscal period.
(l) (1) Before each six-month fiscal period, prepare a
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule in accordance with the
requirements of this paragraph. For each recognized obligation,
the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall identify one
or more of the following sources of payment:
(A) Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(B) Bond proceeds.
(C) Reserve balances.
(D) Administrative cost allowance.
(E) The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, but only to
the extent no other funding source is available or when payment
from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation
or by the provisions of this part.
(F) Other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset
sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived
from the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the
oversight board in accordance with this part.
(2) A Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall not be
deemed valid unless all of the following conditions have been met:
(A) A draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
prepared by the successor agency for the enforceable obligations
of the former redevelopment agency by March 1, 2012. From
January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive, the initial draft of
that schedule shall project the dates and amounts of scheduled
payments for each enforceable obligation, and shall be reviewed
and certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated
pursuant to Section 34182.
(B) The certified Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
submitted to and duly approved by the oversight board.
96
AB 1585
— 13 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(C) A copy of the approved Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is submitted to the county auditor-controller and both
the Controller’s office and the Department of Finance and be posted
on the successor agency’s Internet Web site.
(3) The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be
forward looking to the next six months. The first Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall be submitted to the Controller’s
office and the Department of Finance by April 15, 2012, for the
period of January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive. However,
the first Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted for
the year may, if necessary, include the total amount of payments
required for an enforceable obligation for the next two six-month
periods and, in the case of debt obligations, may include, if
necessary, the amount of the annual debt service, reserve set-asides,
and any other amounts required under indenture or similar
documents. Former redevelopment agency enforceable obligation
payments due, and reasonable or necessary administrative costs
due or incurred, prior to January 1, 2012, shall be made from
property tax revenues received in the spring of 2011 property tax
distribution, and from other revenues and balances transferred to
the successor agency.
(m) Cause a postaudit of the financial transactions and records
of the successor agency to be made at least annually by a certified
public accountant.
SEC. 5. Section 34179 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34179. (a) Each successor agency shall have an oversight
board composed of seven members. The members shall elect one
of their members as the chairperson and shall report the name of
the chairperson and other members to the Department of Finance
on or before May 1, 2012. Members shall be selected as follows:
(1) One member appointed by the county board of supervisors.
(2) One member appointed by the mayor for the city that formed
the redevelopment agency.
(3) One member appointed by the special district having the
largest property tax share within the redevelopment project areas
of the former redevelopment agency, which is of the type of special
district that is eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant
to Section 34188.
96
— 14 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(4) One member appointed by the county superintendent of
education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected. If
the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the
appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the
county board of education.
(5) One member appointed by the Chancellor of the California
Community Colleges to represent community college districts in
the county.
(6) One member of the public appointed by the county board
of supervisors.
(7) One member representing the employees of the former
redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor or chair of the
board of supervisors, as the case may be, from the recognized
employee organization representing the largest number of former
redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor
agency at that time. In the case where city or county employees
performed administrative duties of the former redevelopment
agency, the appointment shall be made from the recognized
employee organization representing those employees. If a
recognized employee organization does not exist for either the
employees of the former redevelopment agency or the city or
county employees performing administrative duties of the former
redevelopment agency, the appointment shall be made from among
the employees of the successor agency. In voting to approve a
contract as an enforceable obligation, a member appointed pursuant
to this paragraph shall not be deemed to be interested in the contract
by virtue of being an employee of the successor agency or
community for purposes of Section 1090 of the Government Code.
(8) If the county or a joint powers agency formed the
redevelopment agency, then the largest city by acreage in the
territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency may
select one member. If there are no cities with territory in a project
area of the redevelopment agency, the county superintendent of
education may appoint an additional member to represent the
public.
(9) If there are no special districts of the type that are eligible
to receive property tax pursuant to Section 34188, within the
territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, then
the county may appoint one member to represent the public.
96
AB 1585
— 15 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(10) Where a redevelopment agency was formed by an entity
that is both a charter city and a county, the oversight board shall
be composed of seven members selected as follows: three members
appointed by the mayor of the city, where such appointment is
subject to confirmation by the county board of supervisors, one
member appointed by the largest special district, by property tax
share, with territory in the territorial jurisdiction of the former
redevelopment agency, which is the type of special district that is
eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188,
one member appointed by the county superintendent of education
to represent schools, one member appointed by the Chancellor of
the California Community Colleges to represent community college
districts, and one member representing employees of the former
redevelopment agency appointed by the mayor of the city where
such an appointment is subject to confirmation by the county board
of supervisors, to represent the largest number of former
redevelopment agency employees employed by the successor
agency at that time.
(b) The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight
board member position described in subdivision (a) that has not
been filled by May 15, 2012, or any member position that remains
vacant for more than 60 days.
(c) The oversight board may direct the staff of the successor
agency to perform work in furtherance of the oversight board’s
duties and responsibilities under this part. The successor agency
shall pay for all of the costs of meetings of the oversight board
and may include such costs in its administrative budget. Oversight
board members shall serve without compensation or reimbursement
for expenses.
(d) Oversight board members shall have personal immunity
from suit for their actions taken within the scope of their
responsibilities as oversight board members.
(e) A majority of the total membership of the oversight board
shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. A majority
vote of the total membership of the oversight board is required for
the oversight board to take action. The oversight board shall be
deemed to be a local entity for purposes of the Ralph M. Brown
Act, the California Public Records Act, and the Political Reform
Act of 1974. All actions taken by the oversight board shall be
adopted by resolution.
96
— 16 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(f) All notices required by law for proposed oversight board
actions shall also be posted on the successor agency’s Internet
Web site or the oversight board’s Internet Web site.
(g) Each member of an oversight board shall serve at the
pleasure of the entity that appointed such member.
(h) The Department of Finance may review an oversight board
action taken pursuant to this part. As such, all oversight board
actions shall not be effective for three business days, pending a
request for review by the department. Each oversight board shall
designate an official to whom the department may make such
requests and who shall provide the department with the telephone
number and email contact information for the purpose of
communicating with the department pursuant to this subdivision.
In the event that the department requests a review of a given
oversight board action, it shall have 10 days from the date of its
request to approve the oversight board action or return it to the
oversight board for reconsideration and such oversight board action
shall not be effective until approved by the department. In the
event that the department returns the oversight board action to the
oversight board for reconsideration, the oversight board shall
resubmit the modified action for department approval and the
modified oversight board action shall not become effective until
approved by the department.
(i) Oversight boards shall have fiduciary responsibilities to
holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that
benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues
pursuant to Section 34188. Further, the provisions of Division 4
(commencing with Section 1000) of the Government Code shall
apply to oversight boards. Notwithstanding Section 1099 of the
Government Code, or any other law, any individual may
simultaneously be appointed to up to five oversight boards and
may hold an office in a city, county, city and county, special
district, school district, or community college district.
(j) Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where
more than one oversight board was created by operation of the act
adding this part, there shall be only one oversight board appointed
as follows:
(1) One member may be appointed by the county board of
supervisors.
96
AB 1585
— 17 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(2) One member may be appointed by the city selection
committee established pursuant to Section 50270 of the
Government Code. In a city and county, the mayor may appoint
one member.
(3) One member may be appointed by the independent special
district selection committee established pursuant to Section 56332
of the Government Code, for the types of special districts that are
eligible to receive property tax revenues pursuant to Section 34188.
(4) One member may be appointed by the county superintendent
of education to represent schools if the superintendent is elected.
If the county superintendent of education is appointed, then the
appointment made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the
county board of education.
(5) One member may be appointed by the Chancellor of the
California Community Colleges to represent community college
districts in the county.
(6) One member of the public may be appointed by the county
board of supervisors.
(7) One member may be appointed by the recognized employee
organization representing the largest number of successor agency
employees in the county.
(k) The Governor may appoint individuals to fill any oversight
board member position described in subdivision (j) that has not
been filled by July 15, 2016, or any member position that remains
vacant for more than 60 days.
(l) Commencing on and after July 1, 2016, in each county where
only one oversight board was created by operation of the act adding
this part, then there will be no change to the composition of that
oversight board as a result of the operation of subdivision (b).
(m) Any oversight board for a given successor agency shall
cease to exist when all of the indebtedness of the dissolved
redevelopment agency has been repaid.
SEC. 6. Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34180. All of the following successor agency actions shall first
be approved by the oversight board:
(a) The establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding
loans where the terms have not been specified prior to the date of
this part.
96
— 18 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(b) Refunding of outstanding bonds or other debt of the former
redevelopment agency by successor agencies in order to provide
for savings or to finance debt service spikes; provided, however,
that no additional debt is created and debt service is not accelerated.
(c) Entering into a financing agreement, including the issuance
of bonds, to fund required payments under an enforceable
obligation that exceed the amount of property tax revenue available
to the successor agency during the payment period. This
subdivision shall not be deemed to authorize a successor agency
to create an additional enforceable obligation, as defined by this
part, other than for necessary financing costs.
(d) Setting aside of amounts in reserves as required by
indentures, trust indentures, or similar documents governing the
issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(e) Merging of project areas.
(f) Continuing the acceptance of federal or state grants, or other
forms of financial assistance from either public or private sources,
where assistance is conditioned upon the provision of matching
funds, by the successor entity as successor to the former
redevelopment agency, in an amount greater than 5 percent of the
total grant amount.
(g) (1) If a city, county, or city and county wishes to retain any
properties or other assets for future redevelopment activities,
funded from its own funds and under its own auspices, it must
reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to
provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base
property tax, as determined pursuant to Section 34188, for the
value of the property retained.
(2) If no other agreement is reached on valuation of the retained
assets, the value will be the fair market value as of the 2011
property tax lien date as determined by the county assessor.
(h) Establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule.
(i) A request by the successor agency to enter into an agreement
with the city, county, or city and county that formed the
redevelopment agency that it is succeeding.
(j) A request by a successor agency or taxing entity to pledge,
or to enter into an agreement for the pledge of, property tax
revenues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34178.
96
AB 1585
— 19 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(k) A loan between a city, county, or city and county and a
redevelopment agency as an enforceable obligation pursuant to
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section
34171, provided that the oversight board makes a finding that the
loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes and conditions
its approval on the loan being repaid to the city, county, or city
and county in accordance with a defined schedule over a reasonable
term of years at an interest rate not to exceed the interest rate earned
by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund.
(l) The approval of temporary increases in the administrative
cost allowance to carry out the requirements of an enforceable
obligation, to cover litigation costs, or to maintain and preserve
the value of assets while in the possession of the successor agency.
SEC. 7. Section 34181 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34181. The oversight board shall direct the successor agency
to do all of the following:
(a) Compile a complete inventory of existing real property assets
of the former redevelopment agency, by project area. The inventory
shall include general categories of real property assets, the purpose
for which they were originally acquired, the original purchase price
of each asset and the estimated current market value. Prior to the
disposal of any real property asset, the oversight board shall receive
and review the inventory compiled by the successor agency, and
adopt a policy or strategy for the disposal or transfer of such assets
consistent with the requirements of subdivision (b).
(b) Dispose of all assets and properties of the former
redevelopment agency that were funded by tax increment revenues
of the dissolved redevelopment agency, other than those
transferred pursuant to subdivision (d); provided, however, that
the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to
transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed and used
for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks,
and fire stations, or are integral to the operation of a governmental
purpose asset, such as a parking facility, to the appropriate public
jurisdiction pursuant to existing agreements, if any, relating to the
construction or use of such an asset. Any compensation to be
provided to the successor agency for the transfer of the asset shall
be governed by agreements, if any, relating to the construction or
96
— 20 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
use of that asset. Disposal shall be done in an expeditious but
orderly manner that preserves the value of the asset.
(c) Cease performance in connection with and terminate all
existing agreements that do not qualify as enforceable obligations.
(d) Transfer housing responsibilities and all rights, powers,
assets, liabilities, duties, and obligations, excluding enforceable
obligations of the successor agency, but including any amounts
on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to the
appropriate entity pursuant to Section 34176.
(e) Terminate any agreement, between the dissolved
redevelopment agency and any public entity located in the same
county, obligating the redevelopment agency to provide funding
for any debt service obligations of the public entity or for the
construction or operation of facilities owned or operated by such
public entity, in any instance where the oversight board has found
that early termination would be in the best interests of the taxing
entities.
(f) Determine whether any contracts, agreements, or other
arrangements between the dissolved redevelopment agency and
any private parties should be terminated or renegotiated to reduce
liabilities and increase net revenues to the taxing entities, and
present proposed termination or amendment agreements to the
oversight board for its approval. The board may approve any
amendments to or early termination of such agreements where it
finds that amendments or early termination would be in the best
interests of the taxing entities.
SEC. 8. Section 34182 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34182. (a) (1) The county auditor-controller shall conduct or
cause to be conducted an agreed-upon procedures audit of each
redevelopment agency in the county that is subject to this part, to
be completed by July 1, 2012.
(2) The purpose of the audits shall be to establish each
redevelopment agency’s assets and liabilities, to document and
determine each redevelopment agency’s passthrough payment
obligations to other taxing agencies, and to document and
determine both the amount and the terms of any indebtedness
incurred by the redevelopment agency and certify the initial
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
96
AB 1585
— 21 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(3) The county auditor-controller may charge the Redevelopment
Property Tax Trust Fund for any costs incurred by the county
auditor-controller pursuant to this part.
(b) By July 15, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall provide
the Controller’s office a copy of all audits performed pursuant to
this section. The county auditor-controller shall maintain a copy
of all documentation and working papers for use by the Controller.
(c) (1) The county auditor-controller shall determine the amount
of property taxes that would have been allocated to each
redevelopment agency in the county had the redevelopment agency
not been dissolved pursuant to the operation of the act adding this
part. These amounts are deemed property tax revenues within the
meaning of subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article XIIIA of the
California Constitution and are available for allocation and
distribution in accordance with the provisions of the act adding
this part. The county auditor-controller shall calculate the property
tax revenues using current assessed values on the last equalized
roll on August 20, pursuant to Section 2052 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, and pursuant to statutory formulas or contractual
agreements with other taxing agencies, as of the effective date of
this section, and shall deposit that amount along with unitary and
supplemental tax increment due to the former redevelopment
agency in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund.
(2) Each county auditor-controller shall administer the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund for the benefit of the
holders of former redevelopment agency enforceable obligations
and the taxing entities that receive passthrough payments and
distributions of property taxes pursuant to this part.
(3) In connection with the allocation and distribution by the
county auditor-controller of property tax revenues deposited in the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, in compliance with this
part, the county auditor-controller shall prepare estimates of
amounts to be allocated and distributed, and provide those estimates
to both the entities receiving the distributions and the Department
of Finance, no later than November 1 and May 1 of each year.
(4) Each county auditor-controller shall disburse proceeds of
asset sales or reserve balances, which have been received from the
successor entities pursuant to Sections 34177 and 34187, to the
taxing entities. In making such a distribution, the county
auditor-controller shall utilize the same methodology for allocation
96
— 22 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
and distribution of property tax revenues provided in Section
34188.
(d) By October 1, 2012, the county auditor-controller shall report
the following information to the Controller’s office and the Director
of Finance:
(1) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund related to each former
redevelopment agency.
(2) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to each agency
under paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(3) The sums of property tax revenues remitted to each successor
agency pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
34183.
(4) The sums of property tax revenues paid to each successor
agency pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section
34183.
(5) The sums paid to each city, county, and special district, and
the total amount allocated for schools pursuant to paragraph (4)
of subdivision (a) of Section 34183.
(6) Any amounts deducted from other distributions pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 34183.
(e) A county auditor-controller may charge the Redevelopment
Property Tax Trust Fund for the costs of administering the
provisions of this part.
(f) The Controller may audit and review any county
auditor-controller action taken pursuant to the act adding this part.
As such, all county auditor-controller actions shall not be effective
for three business days, pending a request for review by the
Controller. In the event that the Controller requests a review of a
given county auditor-controller action, he or she shall have 10 days
from the date of his or her request to approve the county
auditor-controller’s action or return it to the county
auditor-controller for reconsideration and such county
auditor-controller action shall not be effective until approved by
the Controller. In the event that the Controller returns the county
auditor-controller’s action to the county auditor-controller for
reconsideration, the county auditor-controller must resubmit the
modified action for Controller approval and such modified county
auditor-controller action shall not become effective until approved
by the Controller.
96
AB 1585
— 23 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
SEC. 9. Section 34183 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34183. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, from February 1,
2012, to July 1, 2012, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the county
auditor-controller shall, after deducting administrative costs
allowed under Section 34182 and Section 95.3 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code, allocate moneys in each Redevelopment Property
Tax Trust Fund as follows:
(1) Subject to any prior deductions required by subdivision (b),
first, the county auditor-controller shall remit from the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to each local agency and
school entity an amount of property tax revenues in an amount
equal to that which would have been received under Section 33401,
33492.140, 33607, 33607.5, 33607.7, or 33676, as those sections
read on January 1, 2011, or pursuant to any passthrough agreement
between a redevelopment agency and a taxing jurisdiction that
was entered into prior to January 1, 1994, that would be in force
during that fiscal year, had the redevelopment agency existed at
that time. The amount of the payments made pursuant to this
paragraph shall be calculated solely on the basis of passthrough
payment obligations, existing prior to the effective date of this part
and continuing as obligations of successor entities, shall occur no
later than May 16, 2012, and no later than June 1, 2012, and each
January 16 and June 1 thereafter. Notwithstanding subdivision (e)
of Section 33670, that portion of the taxes in excess of the amount
identified in subdivision (a) of Section 33670, which are
attributable to a tax rate levied by a taxing agency for the purpose
of producing revenues in an amount sufficient to make annual
repayments of the principal of, and the interest on, any bonded
indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property
shall be allocated to, and when collected shall be paid into, the
fund of that taxing agency.
(2) (A) Second, on May 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each
January 16 and June 1 thereafter, to each successor agency for
payments listed in its Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
for the six-month fiscal period beginning January 1, 2012, or July
1, 2012, and each January 16 and June 1 thereafter, in the following
order of priority:
(i) Debt service payments scheduled to be made for tax
allocation bonds.
96
— 24 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(ii) Payments scheduled to be made on revenue bonds, but only
to the extent the revenues pledged for them are insufficient to make
the payments and only where the agency’s tax increment revenues
were also pledged for the repayment of the bonds.
(iii) Payments scheduled for other debts and obligations listed
in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule that are required
to be paid from former tax increment revenue.
(B) For purposes of allocations made pursuant to this paragraph,
the auditor-controller shall reserve additional funds in the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund at the time of the January
16 allocation, if necessary, to cover payments made in the second
half of the calendar year, as described in the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule, that are in excess of the amounts anticipated
to be deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund
from the allocation that is received in May or June.
(3) Third, on May 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each January
16 and June 1 thereafter, to each successor agency for the
administrative cost allowance, as defined in Section 34171, for
administrative costs set forth in an approved administrative budget
for those payments required to be paid from former tax increment
revenues.
(4) Fourth, on May 16, 2012, and June 1, 2012, and each January
16 and June 1 thereafter, any moneys remaining in the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund after the payments and
transfers authorized by paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, shall be
distributed to local agencies and school entities in accordance with
Section 34188.
(b) If the successor agency reports, no later than April 1, 2012,
and May 1, 2012, and each December 1 and May 1 thereafter, to
the county auditor-controller that the total amount available to the
successor agency from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust
Fund allocation to that successor agency’s Redevelopment
Obligation Retirement Fund, from other funds transferred from
each redevelopment agency, and from funds that have or will
become available through asset sales and all redevelopment
operations, are insufficient to fund the payments required by
paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (a) in the next
six-month fiscal period, the county auditor-controller shall notify
the Controller and the Department of Finance no later than 10 days
from the date of that notification. The county auditor-controller
96
AB 1585
— 25 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
shall verify whether the successor agency will have sufficient funds
from which to service debts according to the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule and shall report the findings to the
Controller. If the Controller concurs that there are insufficient
funds to pay required debt service, the amount of the deficiency
shall be deducted first from the amount remaining to be distributed
to taxing entities pursuant to paragraph (4), and if that amount is
exhausted, from amounts available for distribution for
administrative costs in paragraph (3). If an agency, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 33492.15, 33492.72, 33607.5, 33671.5,
33681.15, or 33688, made passthrough payment obligations
subordinate to debt service payments required for enforceable
obligations, funds for servicing bond debt may be deducted from
the amounts for passthrough payments under paragraph (1), as
provided in those sections, but only to the extent that the amounts
remaining to be distributed to taxing entities pursuant to paragraph
(4) and the amounts available for distribution for administrative
costs in paragraph (3) have all been exhausted.
(c) The county treasurer may loan any funds from the county
treasury that are necessary to ensure prompt payments of
redevelopment agency debts.
(d) The Controller may recover the costs of audit and oversight
required under this part from the Redevelopment Property Tax
Trust Fund by presenting an invoice therefor to the county
auditor-controller who shall set aside sufficient funds for and
disburse the claimed amounts prior to making the next distributions
to the taxing jurisdictions pursuant to Section 34188. Subject to
the approval of the Director of Finance, the budget of the Controller
may be augmented to reflect the reimbursement, pursuant to
Section 28.00 of the Budget Act.
SEC. 10. Section 34187 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34187. Commencing May 1, 2012, whenever a recognized
obligation that had been identified in the Recognized Payment
Obligation Schedule is paid off or retired, either through early
payment or payment at maturity, the county auditor-controller
shall distribute to the taxing entities, in accordance with the
provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all property tax
revenues that were associated with the payment of the recognized
96
— 26 —AB 1585
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obligation to the extent not currently required for the payment of
other recognized obligations.
SEC. 11. Section 34189 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34189. (a) Commencing on the effective date of this part, all
provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law that depend on
the allocation of tax increment to redevelopment agencies,
including, but not limited to, Sections 33445, 33640, 33641, 33645,
and subdivision (b) of Section 33670, shall be inoperative.
(b) To the extent that a provision of Part 1 (commencing with
Section 33000), Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 34000), Part
1.6 (commencing with Section 34050), and Part 1.7 (commencing
with Section 34100) conflicts with this part, the provisions of this
part shall control. Further, if a provision of Part 1 (commencing
with Section 33000), Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 34000),
Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 34050), or Part 1.7
(commencing with Section 34100) provides an authority that the
act adding this part is restricting or eliminating, the restriction and
elimination provisions of the act adding this part shall control.
(c) It is intended that the provisions of this part shall be read in
a manner as to avoid duplication of payments.
SEC. 12. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order to effectuate the orderly implementation of
responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies,
it is necessary that this act take immediate effect.
O
96
AB 1585
— 27 —
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
(Without Reference to File)
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1585 (John A. Perez, et al.)
As Amended March 21, 2012
2/3 vote. Urgency
HOUSING 5-0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 7-1
Ayes: Torres, Atkins , Ayes: Smyth, Alejo, Bradford,
Bradford, Cedillo, Hueso Campos, Davis, Gordon,
Hueso
Nays: Norby
APPROPRIATIONS 11-3
Ayes: Fuentes, Blumenfield,
Bradford, Charles
Calderon, Campos, Davis,
Gatto, Hill, Lara,
Mitchell, Solorio
Nays: Donnelly, Nielsen, Norby
SUMMARY: Makes changes to the process of dissolving redevelopment agencies (RDAs),
including requiring the funds on deposit in the Low-and Moderate-Income Housing Fund (L&M
Fund) of the former RDA to remain with the entity that assumes the housing functions rather
than being distributed as property tax revenue. Specifically,this bill:
1)Clarifies that the "administrative cost allowance" is 5% of the property tax, including
property tax that was allocated to the former RDA and the successor agency for the 2011-
2012 fiscal year.
2)Specifies that employee costs associated with work on specific project implementation
activities, including, but not limited to, construction inspection, project management, or actual
construction, are not subject to the administrative cost allowance cap.
3)Specifies that costs incurred to fulfill collective bargaining agreements for layoffs or
terminations of city employees who performed work for the former RDA are enforceable
obligations payable from property tax funds.
4)Provides that obligations to employees that are transferred from the former RDA or
successor agency to the entity assuming the housing functions are enforceable obligations
payable from property tax funds.
5)Requires the successor agency or designated local authority to enter into an agreement
with the entity assuming the housing functions and to reimburse it for any costs of the
employee obligations if an employee is transferred to the housing successor entity.
6)Adds the following categories of enforceable obligations and requires their approval by the
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
oversight board:
a) Loans made by the former city, county, or city and county that created the RDA to the
RDA if the loan was made within two years of the date of the creation of a project area, if the
loan was for the project area; and,
b) Loans made from the city or county to the former RDA to make a payment to the state's
Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (SERAF).
1)Clarifies that repayment of SERAF loans made from the L&M Fund to the former RDA
must be deposited into the L&M Fund maintained by the entity that assumes the housing
functions.
2)Requires the oversight board to do the following in order to deem other loan agreements
from the city, county, or city and county to the former RDA an enforceable obligation:
a) Make a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes; and,
b) Condition its approval on the loan being repaid to the city, county, or city and county
based on a defined schedule over a reasonable term, at an interest rate not to exceed the
interest rate earned by funds deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund.
1)Provides that when listing the payment dates for enforceable obligations on the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), the successor agency may list payments on
an annual basis.
2)Specifies that the successor agency is a public entity that is separate from the entity or
entities that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency, that acts by resolution, can
sue and be sued, and can have additional powers that may be conferred upon it.
3)Clarifies that successor agencies are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act.
4)Allows a city, county, or city and county, or joint powers authority that authorized the
creation of the former RDA and elected not to be the successor agency to subsequently
reverse that decision and serve as the successor agency.
5)Provides the reversal of decision does not take effect until 60 days after the notice is
given to the current successor agency and oversight board.
6)Provides that the city, county, or city and county or joint powers authority that reverses
its decision and elects to become the successor agency cannot invalidate any actions of the
current successor agency or oversight board prior to the transfer of responsibility.
7)Requires any amounts on deposit in the L&M Fund of a former RDA to be transferred to
the city, county, or city and county that elected to retain the responsibility for performing the
housing functions of the former agency.
8)Requires any amounts on deposit in the L&M Fund that are transferred to the L&M Fund of
the succeeding housing entity must be maintained in a separate account and used for the
purposes defined in the Community Redevelopment Law relating to authorized uses of the L&M
Fund.
9)Requires the entity that assumes the housing functions of the former RDA to enforce
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
affordability covenants and other related activities as defined in Community Redevelopment
Law.
10)Requires, where there is no local housing authority that elected to accept authority for
performing the housing functions, that any amounts on deposit in the L&M Fund be deposited
in the State Low-and Moderate Income Housing Trust Fund (State Trust Fund), created by this
measure, administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), to
be awarded on a competitive basis to projects within the counties in which it was collected.
11)Requires, when awarding funds out of the State Trust Fund, that priority must be given
to eligible projects that serve extremely low-, very low-, and low-income families and
individuals.
12)Defines "succeeding housing entity" as the entity that assumes responsibility for
retaining the housing assets and functions previously performed by the RDA.
13)Requires the succeeding housing entity to contract to expend at least 80% of the monies
in the L&M Fund within two years of the date of receipt of those monies.
14)Specifies that if within four years of the date of receipt of the L&M Fund monies the
succeeding housing entity has not spent the monies, then the excess amount, minus the
amount necessarily reserved for the ongoing monitoring and maintenance of affordable
housing projects shall be transferred to the State Trust Fund for expenditure by HCD.
15)Prohibits excess funds from being transferred to HCD if the succeeding housing entity
applies for, and receives, a time extension waiver from HCD.
16)Specifies if the waiver is granted the funds shall remain with the succeeding housing
entity for an additional two years.
17)Requires HCD in approving a waiver to consider, among other factors, all of the
following:
a) Whether the succeeding housing entity has a site specific project plan with local
approvals, including the issuance of building permits;
b) Whether the project has secured financing; and,
c) Evidence that some funds have been expended from the L&M Fund.
18)Authorizes a succeeding housing entity to reapply at the end of the two-year period for a
renewal of the previously granted waiver.
19)Authorizes a succeeding housing entity to transfer all or a portion of the monies in the
L&M Fund to another succeeding housing entity within the same county, to be spent on
affordable housing if all of the following conditions are met:
a) The funds will be spent on projects that primarily benefit low-income families or families
that are below low income;
b) Both succeeding housing entities involved in the transfer adopt a resolution detailing the
need for the transfer of funds and the intended use of the funds by the receiving jurisdiction;
and,
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
c) The funds will be spent in compliance with the requirements outlined in 18) through 21)
above.
1)Requires the succeeding housing entity, within 45 days of the date this measure is
enacted, or 45 days from the receipt of moneys from the L&M Fund, whichever is later, to
notify HCD of the amount of money on deposit in the L&M Fund and the entity's plan for
spending it.
2)Requires, within two years from the date of notification to HCD, the succeeding housing
entity to report to HCD the percentage of funds that it has entered into contract to spend.
3)Requires at the end of four years the succeeding housing entity to report to HCD if there
are any remaining moneys in the L&M Fund and to notify HCD if it will be applying for a waiver
or transferring the excess funds to HCD.
4)Requires that assets and properties of the former RDA, under the direction of the
oversight board, be disposed of in an expeditious but orderly manner that preserves the value
of the assets.
5)Provides that the first ROPS for the period of January 1, 2012, through June 20, 2012,
may, if necessary, include the following:
a) The total amount of payments required for enforceable obligations over the next two six-
month periods; and,
b) In the case of debt obligations, the amount of the annual debt service reserve set-asides
and any other amounts required under indenture or similar documents.
1)Clarifies that the member of the oversight board representing special districts should
represent the special district having the largest property tax share within the redevelopment
project areas of the former RDA.
2)Provides that when appointing a member of the oversight board from the employees of
the former RDA, if the majority of the employees were city or county employees, then the
appointment should be made from the organization that represents those employees.
3)Provides that if there is no employee organization that represents the employees of the
former RDA, city, or county, then the appointment should be made from among the employees
of the successor agency.
4)Provides that an employee that is appointed to the oversight board is deemed not to have
a conflict of interest, solely due to his or her employment, in voting to approve a contract as
an enforceable obligation.
5)Requires all actions taken by an oversight board to be adopted by resolution.
6)Allows the successor agency, subject to approval of the oversight board, to enter into a
financing agreement, including issuing bonds, to fund required payments under an enforceable
obligation that exceed the property tax revenue available to the successor agency when the
payment is due.
7)Provides that a successor agency is not permitted to create additional enforceable
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (4 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
obligations except when necessary to pay the financing costs of existing enforceable
obligations.
8)Allows the successor agency, subject to oversight board approval, to temporarily increase
the administrative cost allowance to carry out the requirements of an enforceable obligation,
to cover litigation costs, or to maintain and preserve the value of assets while in the
possession of the successor agency.
9)Requires the oversight board to direct the successor agency to do the following:
a) Compile a complete inventory of existing real property assets of the former RDA by
project area; and,
b) Include in the inventory the general categories of real property assets, the purpose for
which the assets were originally acquired, the original purchase price of each asset, and the
estimated current market value.
1)Requires the oversight board, prior to disposing of any assets, to receive and review the
inventory of assets prepared by the successor agency and adopt a policy or strategy for
disposal or transfer of such assets that ensures it is done in an expeditious but orderly manner
that preserves the value of the asset.
2)Provides that in disposing of assets and properties, the oversight board may direct the
successor agency to transfer ownership of assets that were constructed or used for a purpose
integral to the operation of a governmental purpose, like parking facilities, to the appropriate
public jurisdiction.
3)Requires the auditor-controller to deposit the unitary and supplemental tax increment due
to the former RDA into the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (Property Tax Trust Fund).
4)Requires the auditor-controller, in making the first annual distribution from the Property Tax
Trust Fund, to reserve any funds necessary to cover payments made in the second half of the
calendar year, as described in the ROPS, that are in excess of the amount that is anticipated to
be deposited in the Property Tax Trust Fund from the May or June allocation.
5)Provides that in distributing property tax revenues associated with the payment of a
retired recognized obligation, the auditor-controller should only distribute property tax to the
extent that it is not currently required for the payments of other recognized obligations.
6)Requires the successor agency to cause to be completed an audit of its financial
transactions and records, annually, by a certified accountant.
7)Clarifies that enforceable obligations of the successor agency do not become obligations
of the succeeding housing entity.
8)Deletes the requirement that the California Law Revision Commission draft a Community
Redevelopment Law clean-up bill by January 1, 2013.
9)Includes an urgency clause.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
1)In the absence of this bill, approximately $1.4 billion would be allocated to other units of
local government according to existing law on the distribution of local property tax. To the
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (5 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
extent this bill prevents these revenues from flowing to school districts, there would be a
corresponding cost to the General Fund as the property tax would otherwise offset General
Fund obligations to schools, pursuant to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee. The
actual impact to the General Fund is unknown because it will depend on the number of school
districts that are basic aid and the amount of unreserved housing funds that would otherwise
be allocated to K-14 schools, absent this bill. The $1.4 billion is based on information that
RDAs reported to the State Controller for the fiscal year 2009-2010 and that number counts
assets which would have to be sold and are valued at the actual cost of acquisition, not market
value. However, using the reported $1.4 billion and assuming approximately 50% of local
property tax revenues are allocated to schools, this bill would result in a one-time loss to the
General Fund of as much as $700 million.
2)The Governor's 2012-2013 Budget does not assume that these funds would flow to
schools, so enactment of this legislation would not result in a widening of the estimated budget
deficit. However, enactment would prevent the state from gaining additional budget savings
from property tax payments to schools.
3)This bill changes the definitions of allowable costs for administrative purposes and of
enforceable obligations, which are commitments that RDAs legitimately made prior to their
elimination. Because of these amendments, there are likely to be greater local costs associated
with the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies, costs that can be reimbursed or paid
for out of assets or funds that would otherwise be redistributed to other local agencies,
including schools. These costs are unknown and of significantly smaller magnitude than the
retained L&M housing funds, but could reach millions of dollars.
COMMENTS: In 2011, the Legislature approved and the Governor signed two measures, AB
26 X1 (Blumenfield), Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session and AB 27 X1
(Blumenfield), Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session, that would together
dissolve redevelopment agencies as they existed at the time and create a voluntary
redevelopment program on a smaller scale. In response, the California Redevelopment
Association (CRA) and the League of California Cities, along with other parties filed suit
challenging the two measures. The Supreme Court denied the petition for peremptory writ of
mandate with respect to AB 26 X1. However, the Court did grant CRA's petition with respect to
AB 27 X1. As a result, all redevelopment agencies were required to dissolve as of February 1,
2012.
When the Legislature voted on AB 26 X1 and AB 27 X1, it envisioned that a majority of
redevelopment agencies would likely choose to opt-in to the voluntary program leaving the
state to oversee the dissolution of only a handful of agencies. Because of the subsequent
lawsuits and the Court's ruling, over 400 RDAs are now required to dissolve. The dissolution
process has raised some questions and concerns regarding the implementation of AB 26 X1.
AB 1585 (John A. Perez, et al.) is a response to those concerns and attempts to facilitate a
smooth wind-down of redevelopment agencies. This bill makes a variety of technical changes
that are intended to ease the process of dissolution and provide greater direction to the
successor agencies, oversight boards, and successor housing entities that are integral to the
dissolution process. It also requires that the L&M funds that have been deposited by former
RDAs continue to be used for affordable housing in the county in which they were collected.
Low-and Moderate-Income Housing Funds: RDAs were required to set aside 20% of the tax
increment collected in a project area to fund the creation, preservation, or rehabilitation of
affordable housing. In spending these funds, RDAs were required to meet the housing needs
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (6 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
as outlined in their housing element. The extent to which RDAs spent the L&M funds varied
across redevelopment agencies. Based on 2009-10 reports made to the State Controller's
Office, RDAs reported having in excess of $1.4 billion in their L&M Funds. The Controller's
Community Redevelopment Agencies Annual Report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010,
shows a statewide aggregate "unreserved designated" balance of $967 million and an
"unreserved undesignated" balance of $391 million in agencies L&M Funds. The State
Controller's Office is in the process of auditing the redevelopment agencies for the 2010-11
fiscal year and is required to submit the audit to the Legislature at the end of April.
AB 1585 makes several significant changes to the provisions in AB 26 X1 regarding L&M
funds:
1)Keeps the money on deposit in an L&M Fund with the succeeding housing entity to be
spent on activities allowed under the housing provisions in the Community Redevelopment Law
or, if there is no succeeding housing entity, requires the funds to be transferred to HCD.
2)Requires the succeeding housing entity to expend or encumber 80% of the funds within
four years but gives it the option to petition HCD for more time to spend the funds.
3)Designates the types of affordable housing projects that HCD can fund from monies that
are transferred to the department from jurisdictions that decide not to keep the housing
functions of the former RDA.
4)Authorizes the transfer of the L&M Funds between jurisdictions within the county if certain
conditions are met.
AB 26 X1 specifies that, except for loan agreements made within the first two years of the
life of the agency, or loans that relate to issued securities, it does not recognize other inter
agency loans to be enforceable obligations. Instead, it effectively treats them as contributions
of funds. AB 1585 adds the following to what can be considered an enforceable obligation: 1)
loan agreements between the former RDA and the city, county, or city and county that created
it, made within two years of the date of the creation of a project area, if the loan was for the
project area; 2) loans made from the city or county to the former RDA to make a payment to
SERAF; and, 3) other loans subject to oversight board finding.
AB 26 X1 provides that the liability of the successor agency only extends as far as the
money available from tax increment and former assets of the agency will fund. AB 1585
further clarifies that the successor agency is a public entity that is separate from the entity or
entities that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency, that acts by resolution, can
sue and be sued, and can have additional powers that may be conferred upon it.
Related legislation: SB 654 (Steinberg) would revise the definition of enforceable obligation
to include amounts on deposit in the Low-and Moderate-Income Housing Fund of former RDAs.
This bill is currently in the Assembly Rules Committee.
Analysis Prepared by: Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085
FN: 0003173
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (7 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA A 1585: Bill Analysis - Assembly Floor - 03/27/2012
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comAF_vrd20120327_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (8 of 8) [5/2/2012 3:43:09 PM]
AMENDED IN SENATE JANUARY 31, 2012
AMENDED IN SENATE JANUARY 11, 2012
AMENDED IN SENATE JANUARY 4, 2012
SENATE BILL No. 654
1 Introduced by Senator Steinberg
February 18, 2011
1
2
3
An act to amend Sections 34171, 34176,34177, and 34178 of the
Health and Safety Code, relating to redevelopment, and declaring the
urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 654, as amended, Steinberg. Redevelopment.
Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies
and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified
period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and
community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates
successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies
to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and
to, among other things, repay enforceable obligations, as defined, and
to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds,
including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution
to taxing entities.
Existing law authorizes the city, county, or city and county that
authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency to retain the housing
assets, functions, and powers previously performed by the
redevelopment agency, excluding amounts on deposit in the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund.
96
This bill would revise the definition of the term “enforceable
obligation” and modify provisions relating to the transfer of housing
funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment
agencies. The bill would provide that any amounts on deposit in the
Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a dissolved redevelopment
agency be transferred to specified entities. The bill would make
conforming changes.
Existing law provides that upon a specified date, agreements,
contracts, or arrangements between the city or county, or city and county
that created the redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency
are invalid. Notwithstanding this provision, an agreement that provided
loans or other startup funds for the agency that was entered into within
2 years of the formation of the agency is valid and binds the successor
agency.
The bill would expand this exception to include an agreement
involving a loan specific to a project area and other specified obligations.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an
urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3 majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SECTION 1. Section 34171 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34171. The following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) “Administrative budget” means the budget for administrative
costs of the successor agencies as provided in Section 34177.
(b) “Administrative cost allowance” means an amount that,
subject to the approval of the oversight board, is payable from
property tax revenues of up to 5 percent of the property tax
allocated to the successor agency for the 2011–12 fiscal year and
up to 3 percent of the property tax allocated to the Redevelopment
Obligation Retirement Fund money that is allocated to the
successor agency for each fiscal year thereafter; provided, however,
that the amount shall not be less than two hundred fifty thousand
dollars ($250,000) for any fiscal year or such lesser amount as
agreed to by the successor agency. However, the allowance amount
shall exclude any administrative costs that can be paid from bond
proceeds or from sources other than property tax.
96
— 2 —SB 654
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(c) “Designated local authority” shall mean a public entity
formed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 34173.
(d) (1) “Enforceable obligation” means any of the following:
(A) Bonds, as defined by Section 33602 and bonds issued
pursuant to Section 58383 of the Government Code, including the
required debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other payments
required under the indenture or similar documents governing the
issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment
agency.
(B) Loans of moneys borrowed by the redevelopment agency
for a lawful purpose, to the extent they are legally required to be
repaid pursuant to a required repayment schedule or other
mandatory loan terms.
(C) Payments required by the federal government, preexisting
obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law, other
than passthrough payments that are made by the county
auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183, or legally enforceable
payments required in connection with the agencies’ employees,
including, but not limited to, pension payments, pension obligation
debt service, unemployment payments, or other obligations
conferred through a collective bargaining agreement.
(D) Judgments or settlements entered by a competent court of
law or binding arbitration decisions against the former
redevelopment agency, other than passthrough payments that are
made by the county auditor-controller pursuant to Section 34183.
Along with the successor agency, the oversight board shall have
the authority and standing to appeal any judgment or to set aside
any settlement or arbitration decision.
(E) Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract
that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public
policy. However, nothing in this act shall prohibit either the
successor agency, with the approval or at the direction of the
oversight board, or the oversight board itself from terminating any
existing agreements or contracts and providing any necessary and
required compensation or remediation for such termination.
(F) Contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or
operation of the successor agency, in accordance with this part,
including, but not limited to, agreements to purchase or rent office
space, equipment and supplies, and pay-related expenses pursuant
96
SB 654
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
to Section 33127 and for carrying insurance pursuant to Section
33134.
(G) Amounts borrowed from or payments owing to the Low
and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a redevelopment agency,
which had been deferred as of the effective date of the act adding
this part; provided, however, that the repayment schedule is
approved by the oversight board.
(2) For purposes of this part, “enforceable obligation” does not
include any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the
city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment
agency and the former redevelopment agency. However, written
agreements entered into (A) at the time of issuance, but in no event
later than December 31, 2010, of indebtedness obligations, and
(B) solely for the purpose of securing or repaying those
indebtedness obligations may be deemed enforceable obligations
for purposes of this part. Notwithstanding this paragraph, loan
agreements entered into between the redevelopment agency and
the city, county, or city and county that created it, within two years
of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency, or within two
years of the date of the creation of a project area if the loan is
specific to that project area, and any obligations imposed by
paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 33691 may be deemed
to be enforceable obligations.
(3) Contracts or agreements between the former redevelopment
agency and other public agencies, to perform services or provide
funding for governmental or private services or capital projects
outside of redevelopment project areas that do not provide benefit
to the redevelopment project and thus were not properly authorized
under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall be deemed
void on the effective date of this part; provided, however, that such
contracts or agreements for the provision of housing properly
authorized under Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) shall
not be deemed void.
(e) “Indebtedness obligations” means bonds, notes, certificates
of participation, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued or
delivered by the redevelopment agency, or by a joint exercise of
powers authority created by the redevelopment agency, to
third-party investors or bondholders to finance or refinance
redevelopment projects undertaken by the redevelopment agency
96
— 4 —SB 654
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1
(commencing with Section 33000)).
(f) “Oversight board” shall mean each entity established pursuant
to Section 34179.
(g) “Recognized obligation” means an obligation listed in the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(h) “Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule” means the
document setting forth the minimum payment amounts and due
dates of payments required by enforceable obligations for each
six-month fiscal period as provided in subdivision (m) of Section
34177.
(i) “School entity” means any entity defined as such in
subdivision (f) of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(j) “Successor agency” means the county, city, or city and county
that authorized the creation of each redevelopment agency or
another entity as provided in Section 34173.
(k) “Taxing entities” means cities, counties, a city and county,
special districts, and school entities, as defined in subdivision (f)
of Section 95 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, that receive
passthrough payments and distributions of property taxes pursuant
to the provisions of this part.
SEC. 2. Section 34176 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34176. (a) The city, county, or city and county that authorized
the creation of a redevelopment agency may elect to retain the
housing assets and functions previously performed by the
redevelopment agency. If a city, county, or city and county elects
to retain the responsibility for performing housing functions
previously performed by a redevelopment agency, all rights,
powers, duties, and obligations associated with the housing
activities of the agency, including any amounts on deposit in the
Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, shall be transferred to
the city, county, or city and county. Any funds transferred to the
city, county, or city and county pursuant to this subdivision shall
be maintained in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund and expended pursuant to the provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law relating to the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund.
(b) If a city, county, or city and county does not elect to retain
the responsibility for performing housing functions previously
96
SB 654
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
performed by a redevelopment agency, all rights, powers, assets,
liabilities, duties, and obligations associated with the housing
activities of the agency, including any amounts in the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund, shall be transferred as follows:
(1) Where there is one local housing authority in the territorial
jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, to that local
housing authority.
(2) Where there is more than one local housing authority in the
territorial jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency, to the
local housing authority selected by the city, county, or city and
county that authorized the creation of the redevelopment agency.
(3) Where there is no local housing authority in the territorial
jurisdiction of the former redevelopment agency or where the local
housing authority selected does not accept the responsibility for
performing housing functions previously performed by the former
redevelopment agency, to the Department of Housing and
Community Development.
(c) Commencing on the operative date of this part, the entity
assuming the housing functions formerly performed by the
redevelopment agency shall enforce affordability covenants and
perform related activities pursuant to applicable provisions of the
Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with
Section 33000)), including, but not limited to, Section 33418.
SEC. 3. Section 34177 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34177. Successor agencies are required to do all of the
following:
(a) Continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations.
(1) On and after October 1, 2011, and until a Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule becomes operative, only payments
required pursuant to an enforceable obligations payment schedule
shall be made. The initial enforceable obligation payment schedule
shall be the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency
under Section 34169. However, payments associated with
obligations excluded from the definition of enforceable obligations
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 34171 shall be
excluded from the enforceable obligations payment schedule and
be removed from the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment
agency under Section 34169 prior to the successor agency adopting
it as its enforceable obligations payment schedule pursuant to this
96
— 6 —SB 654
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
subdivision. The enforceable obligation payment schedule may
be amended by the successor agency at any public meeting and
shall be subject to the approval of the oversight board as soon as
the board has sufficient members to form a quorum.
(2) The Department of Finance and the Controller shall each
have the authority to require any documents associated with the
enforceable obligations to be provided to them in a manner of their
choosing. Any taxing entity, the department, and the Controller
shall each have standing to file a judicial action to prevent a
violation under this part and to obtain injunctive or other
appropriate relief.
(3) Commencing on January 1, 2012, only those payments listed
in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule may be made by
the successor agency from the funds specified in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule. In addition, commencing January
1, 2012, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall
supersede the Statement of Indebtedness, which shall no longer
be prepared nor have any effect under the Community
Redevelopment Law.
(4) Nothing in the act adding this part is to be construed as
preventing a successor agency, with the prior approval of the
oversight board, as described in Section 34179, from making
payments for enforceable obligations from sources other than those
listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(5) From October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, a successor agency
shall have no authority and is hereby prohibited from accelerating
payment or making any lump-sum payments that are intended to
prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required
prior to the effective date of this part.
(b) Maintain reserves in the amount required by indentures,
trust indentures, or similar documents governing the issuance of
outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(c) Perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable
obligation.
(d) Remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency
funds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing
entities. In making the distribution, the county auditor-controller
shall utilize the same methodology for allocation and distribution
of property tax revenues provided in Section 34188.
96
SB 654
— 7 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(e) Dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment
agency as directed by the oversight board; provided, however, that
the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to
transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 34181. The disposal is to be done expeditiously and in a
manner aimed at maximizing value. Proceeds from asset sales and
related funds that are no longer needed for approved development
projects or to otherwise wind down the affairs of the agency, each
as determined by the oversight board, shall be transferred to the
county auditor-controller for distribution as property tax proceeds
under Section 34188.
(f) Enforce all former redevelopment agency rights for the
benefit of the taxing entities, including, but not limited to,
continuing to collect loans, rents, and other revenues that were due
to the redevelopment agency.
(g) Effectuate transfer of housing functions and assets to the
appropriate entity designated pursuant to Section 34176.
(h) Expeditiously wind down the affairs of the redevelopment
agency pursuant to the provisions of this part and in accordance
with the direction of the oversight board.
(i) Continue to oversee development of properties until the
contracted work has been completed or the contractual obligations
of the former redevelopment agency can be transferred to other
parties. Bond proceeds shall be used for the purposes for which
bonds were sold unless the purposes can no longer be achieved,
in which case, the proceeds may be used to defease the bonds.
(j) Prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to
the oversight board for its approval. The proposed administrative
budget shall include all of the following:
(1) Estimated amounts for successor agency administrative costs
for the upcoming six-month fiscal period.
(2) Proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in
paragraph (1).
(3) Proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations
services provided by a city, county, city and county, or other entity.
(k) Provide administrative cost estimates, from its approved
administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues
deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the
county auditor-controller for each six-month fiscal period.
96
— 8 —SB 654
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(l) (1) Before each six-month fiscal period, prepare a
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule in accordance with the
requirements of this paragraph. For each recognized obligation,
the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall identify one
or more of the following sources of payment:
(A) Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(B) Bond proceeds.
(C) Reserve balances.
(D) Administrative cost allowance.
(E) The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, but only to
the extent no other funding source is available or when payment
from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation
or by the provisions of this part.
(F) Other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset
sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived
from the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the
oversight board in accordance with this part.
(2) A Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall not be
deemed valid unless all of the following conditions have been met:
(A) A draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
prepared by the successor agency for the enforceable obligations
of the former redevelopment agency by November 1, 2011. From
October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, the initial draft of that schedule
shall project the dates and amounts of scheduled payments for
each enforceable obligation for the remainder of the time period
during which the redevelopment agency would have been
authorized to obligate property tax increment had such a
redevelopment agency not been dissolved, and shall be reviewed
and certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated
pursuant to Section 34182.
(B) The certified Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
submitted to and duly approved by the oversight board.
(C) A copy of the approved Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is submitted to the county auditor-controller and both
the Controller’s office and the Department of Finance and be posted
on the successor agency’s Internet Web site.
(3) The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be
forward looking to the next six months. The first Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall be submitted to the Controller’s
office and the Department of Finance by December 15, 2011, for
96
SB 654
— 9 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
the period of January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive. Former
redevelopment agency enforceable obligation payments due, and
reasonable or necessary administrative costs due or incurred, prior
to January 1, 2012, shall be made from property tax revenues
received in the spring of 2011 property tax distribution, and from
other revenues and balances transferred to the successor agency.
SEC. 4. Section 34178 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34178. (a) Commencing on the operative date of this part,
agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city or county,
or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the
redevelopment agency are invalid and shall not be binding on the
successor agency; provided, however, that a successor entity
wishing to enter or reenter into agreements with the city, county,
or city and county that formed the redevelopment agency that it
is succeeding may do so upon obtaining the approval of its
oversight board.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), any of the following
agreements are not invalid and may bind the successor agency:
(1) A duly authorized written agreement entered into at the time
of issuance, but in no event later than December 31, 2010, of
indebtedness obligations, and solely for the purpose of securing
or repaying those indebtedness obligations.
(2) A written agreement between a redevelopment agency and
the city, county, or city and county that created it that provided
loans or other startup funds for the redevelopment agency that
were entered into within two years of the formation of the
redevelopment agency, or within two years of the date of the
creation of a project area if the loan is specific to that project area,
and any obligations imposed by paragraph (1) of subdivision (d)
of Section 33691.
(3) A joint exercise of powers agreement in which the
redevelopment agency is a member of the joint powers authority.
However, upon assignment to the successor agency by operation
of the act adding this part, the successor agency’s rights, duties,
and performance obligations under that joint exercise of powers
agreement shall be limited by the constraints imposed on successor
agencies by the act adding this part.
SEC. 5.This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
96
— 10 —SB 654
1
2
3
4
5
the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order to effectuate the transfer of housing funds and
responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies,
it is necessary that this act take immediate effect.
O
96
SB 654
— 11 —
State Net | 2011 CA S 654: Bill Analysis - Senate Floor - 02/01/2012
2011 CA S 654: Bill Analysis - Senate Floor - 02/01/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE SB 654
Office of Senate Floor Analyses
1020 N Street, Suite 524
(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) 327-4478
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 654
Author: Steinberg (D)
Amended: 1/31/12
Vote: 21
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 9-0, 1/10/12
AYES: DeSaulnier, Gaines, Harman, Huff, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley, Rubio, Simitian
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 8-0, 1/19/12
AYES: Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Emmerson, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg
NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner
SUBJECT: Redevelopment housing funds
SOURCE: Author
DIGEST: This bill allows the host city or county of a dissolving redevelopment agency to
retain the funds on deposit in the agencys housing fund and expands the types of agency
loans from the host city or county that are considered enforceable obligations.
Senate Floor Amendmentsof 1/31/12 delete the urgency clause.
ANALYSIS: Historically, the Community Redevelopment Law has allowed a local government
to establish a redevelopment area and capture all of the increase in property taxes that is
generated within the area (referred to as "tax increment") over a period of decades. The Law
requires redevelopment agencies to deposit 20 percent of tax increment into a Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund (L&M fund) to be used to increase, improve, and preserve the
community's supply of low and moderate income housing available at an affordable housing
cost.
In 2011, the Legislature enacted two bills, AB 26X (Blumenfield) and AB 27X (Blumenfield),
Chapters 5 and 6, respectively, of the First Extraordinary Session. AB 26X eliminated
redevelopment agencies and established procedures for winding down the agencies, paying off
enforceable obligations, and disposing of agency assets. In defining "enforceable obligations,"
AB 26X included a loan agreement between an agency and its host city or county that was
executed within two years of the date of creation of the redevelopment agency. AB 26X also
included provisions allowing the host city or county of a dissolving redevelopment agency to
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comSF_vrd20120201_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 3) [5/2/2012 3:44:36 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 654: Bill Analysis - Senate Floor - 02/01/2012
retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the agency, except for funds
on deposit in the agency's L&M fund. If the host city or county chooses not to retain these
assets and functions, a local housing authority or the state's Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD) may assume them.
AB 27X allowed redevelopment agencies to avoid elimination if they made payments to
schools in the current budget year and in future years. In December, the California Supreme
Court inCalifornia Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB 26X and overturned AB
27X. As a result, all of the state's roughly 400 redevelopment agencies will dissolve on
February 1, 2012.
This bill makes the following changes to AB 26X, the redevelopment agency elimination bill:
1. Allows a host city or county of a dissolving agency to retain the funds on deposit in the
agency's L&M fund and requires the city or county to expend those funds in compliance with
the housing provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. If the city or county chooses
not to retain these funds, the local housing authority or HCD may do so.
2. Requires, rather than permits, an entity assuming the housing functions of an agency to
enforce affordability covenants on affordable housing properties.
3. Expands the definition of an "enforceable obligation" to include two additional types of
loan agreements between an agency and its host city or county: (a) a loan that was executed
within two years of the date of creation of a project area, if the loan is specific to that project
area; and (b) a loan to fund the agency's 2009-10 SERAF (Supplemental Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund) payment to schools.
Comments
Undoing a last minute change. The State Controller's "Community Redevelopment Agencies
Annual Report" for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 shows a statewide aggregate
"unreserved designated" balance of $967 million and an "unreserved undesignated" balance of
$391 million in agency L&M funds. The language of Governor Brown's initial proposal to
eliminate redevelopment agencies would have allowed host cities and counties to retain the
L&M fund balances of a dissolving agency. The bill that the Legislature ultimately enacted,
however, reversed this authority. At the time, staff stated that the change was made out of a
concern that allowing retention of L&M fund balances potentially could be viewed as a
reallocation of property tax and thus trigger a two-thirds vote requirement for all of AB 26X.
Legislative Counsel has since settled on the view that L&M funds are assets of the
redevelopment agencies under Article XVI, Section 16 of the State Constitution and not
property taxes under Section 1 of Article XIII A. This view is reflected in the majority vote key
for this bill. This bill restores the governor's original proposal to allow cities and counties to
keep L&M fund balances and continue to use them to develop affordable housing.
Start-up loans. Because it often takes years after the adoption of a project area for a
redevelopment agency to begin receiving sufficient tax increment to issue bonds, most host
cities and counties jump-start work in project areas by making loans to the agency to be
repaid with future tax increment. AB 26X only recognizes as "enforceable obligations" loans
made within two years of the creation of the agency, which practically only affects an agency's
first project area. Many agencies have multiple project areas. This bill adds to the definition of
"enforceable obligations" loans made within the first two years of the adoption of a project
area, provided that the loan is specific to that project area. The bill does not recognize loans
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comSF_vrd20120201_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 3) [5/2/2012 3:44:36 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 654: Bill Analysis - Senate Floor - 02/01/2012
made at a later date, in which case the host city or county may not receive repayment of those
later loans.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Fund
Local retention of One-time loss of up to $700,000 General
RDA housing funds in savings
SUPPORT: (Verified 1/19/12)
Abode Communities Affirmed Housing Group Aging Services of California Angelus Plaza Bay
Area Local Initiatives Support Corporation BONNEWIT development services Boston Financial
Investment Management, L.P. Building Futures with Women and Children Cabrillo Economic
Development Corporation California Housing Consortium California Housing Partnership
Corporation California Infill Builders Association Charities Housing Cities of Brea, Buena Park,
Chico, Citrus Heights, Hanford, La Palma, Oakland, Palm Springs, Riverside, and San Mateo
CLIFFORD BEERS HOUSING Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning
Association, Inc. Community Housing Partnership EAH Housing East Bay Developmental
Disabilities Legislative Coalition EDEN Housing Enterprise Community Partners, Inc Equity
Community Builders LLC EveryOne Home Housing Authority of the city of Riverbank Housing
Consortium of the East Bay Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County Housing Now
Human Investment Project (HIP) Housing Jamboree Housing Corporation John Stewart
Company Las Palmas Foundation LINC Housing Mercy Housing California MidPen Housing Napa
Valley Community Housing North Bay Housing Coalition, Inc. Peoples' Self-Help Housing
Corporation Petaluma Ecumenical Properties (PEP Housing) Resources for Community
Development Sacramento Yolo Mutual Housing Association San Diego Housing Federation
SHELTER, Inc. of Contra Costa County Silicon Valley Bank Skid Row Housing Trust South
County Housing Corporation Step Up on Second SWJ Housing Tenderloin Neighborhood
Development Corporation The Housing Trust of Santa Clara County The Non-Profit Housing
Association of Northern California
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the author's office, this bill is intended to preserve
for affordable housing the roughly $2 billion in outstanding balances in the L&M funds
maintained by redevelopment agencies throughout the state. In the absence of this legislation,
those funds will be liquidated and distributed as property tax revenues to local agencies, as
prescribed in AB 26X. Late last year, the Legislature supported these same changes in SB 8X
(Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee), but Governor Brown vetoed that bill, stating
that it was "premature" in light of the then-pending litigation.
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ANALYSIS_comSF_vrd20120201_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 3) [5/2/2012 3:44:36 PM]
AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 29, 2012
SENATE BILL No. 1151
1 Introduced by Senator Steinberg
February 21, 2012
1
2
3
An act to amend Section 34177 of, and to add Section Sections
34177.1 and 34177.2 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to
redevelopment economic development.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 1151, as amended, Steinberg. Redevelopment: long range
Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund:
long-range asset management plan.
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community
development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the
designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law imposes
various requirements on successor agencies and subjects successor
agency actions to the review of oversight boards. Existing law requires
successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved
redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, dispose of assets
and properties of the former redevelopment agencies, as directed by
the oversight board. Proceeds from the sale of assets are transferred to
the county auditor-controller for distribution as property tax proceeds
to taxing entities, as prescribed.
This bill would provide that the asset disposition and transfer
provisions do not apply to a jurisdiction in which a Community
Development and Housing Authority (authority) has been formed by
August 1, 2012. The bill would establish a Sustainable Economic
Development and Housing Trust Fund, to be administered by an
authority, to serve as a repository of the unencumbered balances and
98
assets of the former redevelopment agency. The bill would authorize
moneys from the fund to be expended for specified purposes relating
to economic development and affordable housing. The bill would require
the successor agency an authority to prepare a long range long-range
asset management plan that outlines a strategy for maximizing the
long-term value of the real property and assets of the former
redevelopment agency for ongoing economic development and housing
functions governs the disposition and ongoing use of the fund. The bill
would require the successor agency an authority to submit the plan to
the Department of Finance and the oversight board by December 1,
2012, and would require the approval of the plan by the department and
oversight board by December 31, 2012 department to approve or return
the plan for revision to the authority prior to final approval by December
31, 2012.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares that the assets,
properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and
equipment of former redevelopment agencies constitute a valuable
resource that should be maintained for the purpose of economic
development and housing within the communities served by the
former redevelopment agency.
SEC. 2. Section 34177 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34177. Successor agencies are required to do all of the
following:
(a) Continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations.
(1) On and after February 1, 2012, and until a Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule becomes operative, only payments
required pursuant to an enforceable obligations payment schedule
shall be made. The initial enforceable obligation payment schedule
shall be the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency
under Section 34169. However, payments associated with
obligations excluded from the definition of enforceable obligations
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 34171 shall be
excluded from the enforceable obligations payment schedule and
be removed from the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment
98
— 2 —SB 1151
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
agency under Section 34169 prior to the successor agency adopting
it as its enforceable obligations payment schedule pursuant to this
subdivision. The enforceable obligation payment schedule may
be amended by the successor agency at any public meeting and
shall be subject to the approval of the oversight board as soon as
the board has sufficient members to form a quorum.
(2) The Department of Finance and the Controller shall each
have the authority to require any documents associated with the
enforceable obligations to be provided to them in a manner of their
choosing. Any taxing entity, the department, and the Controller
shall each have standing to file a judicial action to prevent a
violation under this part and to obtain injunctive or other
appropriate relief.
(3) Commencing on May 1, 2012, only those payments listed
in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule may be made by
the successor agency from the funds specified in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule. In addition, commencing May 1,
2012, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall supersede
the Statement of Indebtedness, which shall no longer be prepared
nor have any effect under the Community Redevelopment Law.
(4) Nothing in the act adding this part is to be construed as
preventing a successor agency, with the prior approval of the
oversight board, as described in Section 34179, from making
payments for enforceable obligations from sources other than those
listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(5) From February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, a successor agency
shall have no authority and is hereby prohibited from accelerating
payment or making any lump-sum payments that are intended to
prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required
prior to the effective date of this part.
(b) Maintain reserves in the amount required by indentures,
trust indentures, or similar documents governing the issuance of
outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(c) Perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable
obligation.
(d) (1) Remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency
funds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing
entities, including, but not limited to, the unencumbered balance
of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a former
redevelopment agency. In making the distribution, the county
98
SB 1151
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
auditor-controller shall utilize the same methodology for allocation
and distribution of property tax revenues provided in Section
34188.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply to a jurisdiction where a
Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority has
been formed pursuant to Part 1.86 (commencing with Section
34191.1) by August 1, 2012.
(e) (1) Dispose of assets and properties of the former
redevelopment agency as directed by the oversight board, provided,
however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor
agency to transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Section 34181, and in accordance with the long
range asset management plan specified in Section 34177.1. The
disposal shall be done expeditiously, in a manner aimed at
maximizing value, but shall not be done until the long range asset
management plan is approved. Proceeds from asset sales and
related funds that are no longer needed for approved development
projects or to otherwise wind down the affairs of the agency, each
as determined by the oversight board, shall be transferred to the
county auditor-controller for distribution as property tax proceeds
under Section 34188.
(2) Prior to the disposal of any real property pursuant to this
subdivision, the successor agency shall comply with all relevant
provisions of the Government Code, Public Contract Code, and
other codes, relating to the rules and disclosure requirements for
the fair market valuation of assets, competitive bidding, and
conflicts of interest.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply to a jurisdiction where a
Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority has
been formed pursuant to Part 1.86 (commencing with Section
34191.1) by August 1, 2012.
(f) Enforce all former redevelopment agency rights for the
benefit of the taxing entities, including, but not limited to,
continuing to collect loans, rents, and other revenues that were due
to the redevelopment agency.
(g) Effectuate transfer of housing functions and assets to the
appropriate entity designated pursuant to Section 34176.
(h) Expeditiously wind down the affairs of the redevelopment
agency pursuant to the provisions of this part and in accordance
with the direction of the oversight board.
98
— 4 —SB 1151
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(i) Continue to oversee development of properties until the
contracted work has been completed or the contractual obligations
of the former redevelopment agency can be transferred to other
parties. Bond proceeds shall be used for the purposes for which
bonds were sold unless the purposes can no longer be achieved,
in which case, the proceeds may be used to defease the bonds.
(j) Prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to
the oversight board for its approval. The proposed administrative
budget shall include all of the following:
(1) Estimated amounts for successor agency administrative costs
for the upcoming six-month fiscal period.
(2) Proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in
paragraph (1).
(3) Proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations
services provided by a city, county, city and county, or other entity.
(k) Provide administrative cost estimates, from its approved
administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues
deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the
county auditor-controller for each six-month fiscal period.
(l) (1) Before each six-month fiscal period, prepare a
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule in accordance with the
requirements of this paragraph. For each recognized obligation,
the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall identify one
or more of the following sources of payment:
(A) Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(B) Bond proceeds.
(C) Reserve balances.
(D) Administrative cost allowance.
(E) The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, but only to
the extent no other funding source is available or when payment
from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation
or by the provisions of this part.
(F) Other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset
sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived
from the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the
oversight board in accordance with this part.
(2) A Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall not be
deemed valid unless all of the following conditions have been met:
(A) A draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
prepared by the successor agency for the enforceable obligations
98
SB 1151
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
of the former redevelopment agency by March 1, 2012. From
October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, the initial draft of that schedule
shall project the dates and amounts of scheduled payments for
each enforceable obligation for the remainder of the time period
during which the redevelopment agency would have been
authorized to obligate property tax increment had such a
redevelopment agency not been dissolved, and shall be reviewed
and certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated
pursuant to Section 34182.
(B) The certified Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
submitted to and duly approved by the oversight board.
(C) A copy of the approved Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is submitted to the county auditor-controller and both
the Controller’s office and the Department of Finance and be posted
on the successor agency’s Internet Web site.
(3) The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be
forward looking to the next six months. The first Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall be submitted to the Controller’s
office and the Department of Finance by April 15, 2012, for the
period of January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive. Former
redevelopment agency enforceable obligation payments due, and
reasonable or necessary administrative costs due or incurred, prior
to January 1, 2012, shall be made from property tax revenues
received in the spring of 2011 property tax distribution, and from
other revenues and balances transferred to the successor agency.
SEC. 3. Section 34177.1 is added to the Health and Safety
Code, to read:
34177.1.(a) The successor agency shall prepare a long range
asset management plan that outlines a strategy for maximizing the
long-term value of the real property and assets of the former
redevelopment agency for ongoing economic development and
housing functions.
(b) The plan shall do all of the following:
(1) Address the use or disposition of all of the assets of the
former redevelopment agency identified by the county
auditor-controller in the audit conducted pursuant to subdivision
(a) of Section 34182.
(2) Include an inventory of all assets identified by the
auditor-controller consisting of an estimate of the market value of
the asset and a description of the highest and best use of the asset
98
— 6 —SB 1151
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
for the community. Permissible uses include the retention of the
asset for governmental use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section
34181, the sale of the asset, and the retention of the asset in a
governmental trust for the purpose of maximizing the value of the
asset for ongoing economic development activity.
(c) The successor agency shall submit the plan to the department
and the oversight board by December 1, 2012. The plan shall be
approved by both the oversight board and the department by
December 31, 2012. The department, in consultation with the
oversight board, may object to and modify any provision of the
plan.
34177.1. (a) A Community Development and Housing
Authority established pursuant to Part 1.86 (commencing with
Section 34191.1) shall prepare a long-range asset management
plan that shall govern the disposition and ongoing use of the
Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund.
(b) (1) The long-range asset management plan shall be
submitted to the Department of Finance for approval by December
1, 2012. The department shall approve the plan or return the plan
to the authority for revisions prior to final approval, by December
31, 2012. The plan shall be updated annually and submitted to the
department for approval by December 1 of each year.
(2) The department, as a condition of granting approval to the
long-range asset management plan submitted by the authority,
may choose to establish a minimum asset distribution requirement,
to ensure that K–14 schools and local agencies receive a minimal
amount of funding from the dissolution of assets of the trust
pursuant to Section 34188.
(c) The long-range asset management plan shall outline a
strategy for maximizing the long-term social and monetary value
of the real property and assets in the trust for the purpose of
sustainable economic development consistent with Part 1.86
(commencing with Section 34191.1) and creating high wage, high
skill jobs, and affordable housing.
(d) The long-range asset management plan shall do both of the
following:
(1) Include an inventory of all assets in the trust, including, but
not limited to, all assets identified by the auditor-controller in the
audit conducted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34182. The
inventory shall consist of the following:
98
SB 1151
— 7 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(A) The date of the acquisition of the asset and the value of the
asset at that time, and an estimate of the current value of the asset.
(B) The purpose for which the asset was acquired.
(C) For real property assets:
(i) Parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning
in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community,
or general plan.
(ii) An estimate of the current value of the parcel, including, if
available, any appraisal information.
(iii) A history of environmental contamination, including
designation as a brownfield, and any related environmental studies
and history of any remediation efforts.
(iv) A description of the strategic value of the property with
respect to its potential for transit-oriented development and
advancing the planning objectives of the member agencies of the
Community Development and Housing Authority.
(v) A brief history of previous development proposals and
activity, including rental or lease of property.
(2) Address the use or disposition of all of the assets in the trust.
Permissible uses include the retention of the asset for governmental
use pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the sale of the
asset, and the retention of the asset in the trust for future use. It
shall not be necessary to maximize the monetary value of the asset
if an alternative deployment of the asset furthers social and
community objectives determined by the authority and consistent
with this article. Property disposed of by the authority shall not
be the subject of real estate speculation.
(e) All entities receiving financial support from or authorized
by this article shall incorporate into any and all agreements a jobs
plan, which shall describe how the project will create construction
careers that pay prevailing wages, living wage permanent jobs,
and a program for community outreach, local hire, and job
training. This plan shall also describe the project developer’s
commitment to offer jobs to disadvantaged California residents,
including veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, people with
a history in the criminal justice system, and single parent families.
SEC. 4. Section 34177.2 is added to the Health and Safety
Code, to read:
34177.2. (a) The Sustainable Economic Development and
Housing Trust Fund is hereby established to serve as the repository
98
— 8 —SB 1151
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
of the unencumbered balances for each former redevelopment
agency’s funds, assets, and properties. For purposes of this section,
“assets” shall include, but are not limited to, real and personal
property holdings, tax revenues, former redevelopment project
revenues, other revenues, and investment accounts, deeds of trust
and mortgages held by the former agency, rents, fees, charges,
moneys, accounts receivable, contracts rights, and other rights to
payment of whatever kind or other real or personal property.
(b) In addition to the assets of the former redevelopment
agencies, the trust fund may accept revenues from any source,
including tax revenues, grants, and loans. Notwithstanding
paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 34177, the proceeds
of asset sales may be retained for ongoing sustainable economic
development and affordable housing activities of the joint powers
authority specified in and consistent with Part 1.86 (commencing
with Section 34191.1), and shall not be distributed as property tax
pursuant to Section 34188.
(c) The Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust
Fund shall be administered by the Community Development and
Housing Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to Part 1.86
(commencing with Section 34191.1).
(d) Moneys in the Sustainable Economic Development and
Housing Trust Fund may be used for any of the following purposes:
(1) The purchase, acquisition, financing, or maintenance of
public or private infrastructure needed for infill development
consistent with Chapter 728 of the Statutes of 2008.
(2) Affordable housing.
(3) Transitional housing needed for former inmate populations
transferred to the jurisdiction of the counties pursuant to the 2011
criminal justice realignment.
(4) Loans to public or private entities for development activities
defined in Section 34191.2.
(5) Environmental mitigation, including, but not limited to,
brownfield site remediation.
(6) Payment of liabilities of the former redevelopment agency.
(7) Land acquisition.
(8) Clean energy and energy efficiency investments.
(9) Educational, labor-management, and job training programs
leading to careers in high-need, high-growth, or emerging regional
economic sectors.
98
SB 1151
— 9 —
1
2
3
(e) This section shall apply to a jurisdiction where a Community
Development and Housing Authority has been formed pursuant to
Part 1.86 (commencing with Section 34191.1) by August 1, 2012.
O
98
— 10 —SB 1151
State Net | 2011 CA S 1151: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
2011 CA S 1151: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN
AUTHOR: steinberg
VERSION: 3/29/12
Analysis by: Carrie Cornwell
FISCAL: yes
Hearing date: April 24, 2012
SUBJECT:
Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund
DESCRIPTION:
This bill permits local jurisdictions to use an alternative process to administer the assets of
their former redevelopment agencies for economic development and housing purposes. To do
so, the bill authorizes a Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority to place
redevelopment assets in a Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund and
requires a long-range asset management plan to govern that trust fund.
ANALYSIS:
Historically, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed a local government to establish a
redevelopment area and capture all of the increase in property taxes generated within the area
(referred to as "tax increment") over a period of decades. The law requires redevelopment
agencies to deposit 20 percent of tax increment into a Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund (L&M fund) to be used to increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of low
and moderate income housing available at an affordable housing cost.
In 2011, the Legislature enacted two bills, AB 26X (Blumenfield) and AB 27X (Blumenfield),
Chapters 5 and 6, respectively, of the First Extraordinary Session. AB 26X eliminated
redevelopment agencies and established procedures for winding down the agencies, paying off
enforceable obligations, and disposing of agency assets. AB 26X established successor
agencies, typically the city or county that established the agency, to take control of all
redevelopment agency assets, properties, and other items of value. Successor agencies are to
dispose of an agency's assets as directed by an oversight board, made up of representatives of
local taxing entities, with the proceeds transferred to the county auditor-controller for
distribution to taxing agencies within each county.
AB 26X also included provisions allowing the host city or county of a dissolving
redevelopment agency to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the
agency, except for funds on deposit in the agency's L&M fund, and thus become a successor
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 4) [5/2/2012 3:42:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1151: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
housing agency. If the host city or county chooses not to become the successor housing
agency, a local housing authority or the state's Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) may do so.
AB 27X allowed redevelopment agencies to avoid elimination if they made payments to
schools in the current budget year and in future years. In December 2011, the California
Supreme Court in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB 26X and
overturned AB 27X. As a result, all of the state's roughly 400 redevelopment agencies
dissolved on February 1, 2012, and local jurisdictions are in the process of implementing AB
26X's provisions to distribute former redevelopment assets.
This bill:
1. Provides that the AB 26X process for disposing of redevelopment agency assets and
remitting unencumbered balances funds for distribution to the taxing entities does not apply to
a jurisdiction that has by August 1, 2012 formed a Community Development and Housing Joint
Powers Authority (authority) pursuant to SB 1156 (Steinberg), which is also on today's
agenda.
2. Requires each authority to administer a Sustainable Economic Development and Housing
Trust Fund to receive and hold the former redevelopment agency's unencumbered funds,
assets, and properties. The trust fund may also accept revenues from any source and may
include the proceeds from selling redevelopment agency assets.
3. Allows an authority to use the trust fund for public or private infrastructure needed for
infill development, affordable housing, land acquisitions, clean energy, education, job training,
transitional housing for former inmates transferred to a county pursuant to the 2011
realignment, loans for development activities, and environmental mitigation, including cleaning
up brownfield sites.
4. Directs an authority to prepare a long-range asset management plan to govern the
disposition and ongoing use of the Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust
Fund. The plan must:
Inventory all assets, assess the value and purpose of acquisition of these assets, and
determine the current value of real property assets.
Address the use or disposition of all of the assets in the trust.
Outline a strategy for maximizing the long-term social and monetary value of the real
property and assets in the trust consistent with the provisions of SB 1156 and so as to create
high wage and high skill jobs, plus affordable housing.
1. Requires the authority to submit this long-range asset management plan to the
Department of Finance (DOF) for approval by December 1, 2012. DOF may approve the plan
or return it for revisions by December 31, 2012. An authority must update and resubmit its
plan annually to DOF by each December 1 thereafter. DOF, as a condition of granting its
approval, may require that K-14 schools and local agencies receive a minimal amount of
funding from the dissolution of assets.
2. Requires any entity receiving financial support under this bill or SB 1156 to incorporate
into any and all agreements a jobs plan, which shall describe how the project will create
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 4) [5/2/2012 3:42:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1151: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
construction careers that pay prevailing wages and a program for community outreach, local
hire, and job training.
COMMENTS:
1. Purpose. AB 26X requires successor agencies, at the direction of their oversight boards,
to dispose of the former RDA assets "expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing
value" but offers no guidance on how to achieve this objective. Absent such guidance, the
author is concerned that the result may be the "fire sale" of real property assets of the former
redevelopment agencies and a transfer of wealth from the public to private sectors. To address
this concern, this bill establishes Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Funds
to serve as repositories for the assets of the former redevelopment agencies, including cash,
liquid investments, and real and personal property expected to be valued in the billions of
dollars. City and county joint powers authorities would manage these trusts for future
economic development and housing activities.
The bill requires joint powers authorities to develop Long Range Asset Management Plans to
maximize the social and economic value of the former redevelopment agency assets for the
public sector. The plans would include detailed valuation and environmental contamination
information on a parcel-by-parcel basis and facilitate the integration of properties into local
land use plans. The bill authorizes the use of the trust funds to finance public and private
infrastructure needed for infill development, affordable housing, environmental mitigation,
former military bases, clean energy and energy efficiency, as well as educational, labor-
management, and job training programs leading to high skill, high wage jobs.
2. Definitions needed. This bill directs that these trust funds receive and hold
redevelopment assets and then use those assets for public or private infrastructure needed for
infill development, affordable housing, land acquisitions, clean energy, education, job training,
transitional housing for former inmates transferred to a county pursuant to the 2011
realignment, loans for development activities, and environmental mitigation, including cleaning
up brownfield sites. The bill, however, does not provide definitions of these terms. Definitions
are necessary to ensure that the use of these funds comports with state goals and polices. In
particular, existing redevelopment law provides extensive definitions and rules on the provision
of affordable housing to ensure that it is provided to income-qualified individuals in proportion
to their population in the community.
3. Two housing agencies. It is unclear how the affordable housing functions of the authority
will interact with the work of the successor housing agencies established by AB 26X. The
committee may wish to amend this bill to ensure that all of the housing assets, including the
L&M balances, are located in one entity by allowing the authority to contribute its resources to
the housing successor entity.
4. Who is in charge ? AB 26X gives oversight boards broad discretion to approve or
disapprove successor agencies' actions. Each successor agency must, every six months, draft a
list of enforceable obligations that are payable during a subsequent six-month period, to which
the oversight board must agree. This bill does allow a Community Development and Housing
Joint Powers Authority to use funds in the Sustainable Economic Development and Housing
Trust Fund to pay a former redevelopment agency's liabilities and does not limit this authority
to paying for liabilities that are recognized by an oversight board as enforceable obligations.
One could see how this bill could undermine the oversight board process by allowing an
authority to use proceeds from former redevelopment assets to pay for redevelopment
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 4) [5/2/2012 3:42:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1151: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
liabilities that an oversight board would not recognize as an enforceable obligation. The
committee may wish to amend this bill to clarify the role of the oversight board when a
community forms an authority under this bill.
5. Urgency needed. This bill offers communities an alternative approach to managing former
redevelopment agency assets if they establish an authority before August 1, 2012. This timing
is necessary because successor agencies are working now to distribute those assets. But
because this bill does not include an urgency clause, its provisions will not take effect until
January 1, 2013. The author or committee may wish to consider amending the bill to include
an urgency clause.
6. Technical amendments.
On page 8, line 25, after the "and" insert "is" On page 8, line 29, delete "article" and insert
"this part or Part 1.86 (commencing with Section 34191.1)" On page 9, lines 14-15, delete
"joint powers authority specified in and consistent with" and insert "Community Development
and Housing Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to" On page 9, line 32, delete
"34191.2" and insert "34191.15"
1. Committee of second referral. The Rules Committee referred this bill to the Governance
and Finance Committee and to the Transportation and Housing Committee. This bill passed
that committee on April 18 by a 6 to 3 vote. The Governance and
Finance Committee's analysis and hearing of the bill dealt primarily with the provisions of
the bill related to the local government finance provisions, leaving the housing provisions for
review in this committee.
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, April 18, 2012)
SUPPORT:
BRIDGE Housing California Infill Builders Association California Labor Federation California
State Association of Counties DMB Pacific Ventures Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
Mission Bay Development Group
OPPOSED:
None received.
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (4 of 4) [5/2/2012 3:42:04 PM]
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 30, 2012
AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 29, 2012
SENATE BILL No. 1156
1 Introduced by Senator Steinberg
February 22, 2012
1
2
3
4
An act to add Part 1.86 (commencing with Section 34191.1) to
Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Section
21094.5 of the Public Resources Code, relating to economic
development.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 1156, as amended, Steinberg. Community Development and
Housing Joint Powers Authority.
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment
of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of
blight, as defined. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and
community development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides
for the designation of successor agencies. Existing law requires that the
successor agency, among other things, wind down the affairs of the
former redevelopment agency and dispose of assets and properties of
the former redevelopment agency, as directed by an oversight board.
Existing law provides for various economic development programs
that foster community sustainability and community and economic
development initiatives throughout the state.
This bill would authorize the legislative body of the city and county
representing the geographic territory covering the area served by a
former redevelopment agency to elect to form a Community
Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority (authority) after July
1, 2012, and to carry out the provisions of the Community
97
Redevelopment Law. The bill would authorize the authority to adopt a
redevelopment plan for a project area covering specified areas and sites
and to include a provision in the plan to provide for tax increment
financing, provided that certain mitigation and land use plans have been
adopted. The bill would retain the Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund of a former redevelopment agency in another fund and authorize
the authority to enter into agreements to facilitate articulated career
technical education pathways.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SECTION 1. Part 1.86 (commencing with Section 34191.1) is
added to Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:
PART 1.86. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
PROGRAM
Chapter 1. General Provisions
34191.1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that better
economic development patterns in California can contribute to
greater economic growth by reducing commuter times for
employees, reducing the costs of public infrastructure, and reducing
energy consumption. Better development patterns may also result
in increased options in the type of housing available, more
affordable housing, and a reduction in a household’s combined
housing and transportation costs.
(b) The construction industry has been one of the sectors hardest
hit by the economic downturn of recent years. Creating incentives
for construction can help restore construction jobs, which are
essential for a restoration of prosperity.
(c) Economic development patterns can also help California
attain some of its long-term strategic environmental objectives
including reduced air pollution, greater water conservation, reduced
energy consumption, and increased farmland and habitat
preservation.
(d) Implementation of the growth plans identified by the
metropolitan planning organizations in their sustainable
97
— 2 —SB 1156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
communities strategies, and in particular the development of areas
identified for transit priority projects, is essential if California is
to achieve the multiple benefits that would result from economic
development.
(e) In addition to the economic problems of the current
recession, development of transit priority projects remains
challenging. Infrastructure is often old and inadequate. Sites may
suffer from contamination that is expensive to remediate. The high
construction costs in urban areas, particularly for multifamily
dwellings, create an additional challenge. For these reasons, it is
critical to restructure and refocus redevelopment in California to
assist in achievement of these multiple benefits.
(f) At the same time, California cannot afford a redevelopment
program that causes schools to lose revenue at a time when
investing in education is also key to the state’s economic
prosperity. A growth plan for the state consistent with regional
sustainable communities strategies must also provide that schools
are able to play their full role in achieving the future of California.
(g) The elimination of redevelopment agencies has resulted in
the loss of approximately $1 billion one billion dollars
($1,000,000,000) annually in low- and moderate-income housing
funds for communities throughout the state. Communities need
alternative, permanent sources of revenue to support the continued
production of affordable housing units.
(h) The Legislature finds that a comprehensive strategy for the
long-term economic development of the state must encourage the
creation of workforce skills needed to attract and retain a high-wage
workforce, in addition to public infrastructure requirements. Public
investments in human capital are as vital to the long-term growth
of the state’s economy as investments in physical capital.
34191.2. For purposes of this part, “authority” or “Community
Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority” means the
joint exercise of powers agency formed under Chapter 5
(commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the
Government Code.
Chapter 2. Community Development and Housing Joint
Powers Authority
97
SB 1156
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
34191.10. (a) The legislative body bodies of the city and
county representing the geographic territory covering the area
served by a former redevelopment agency may elect to form a
Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority
pursuant to this part after July 1, 2012, to carry out the provisions
of the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1.8 (commencing
with Section 33000)). If the former redevelopment agency was
formed solely by a county, the county may exercise the powers
authorized by this part.
(b) The authority may enter into financial and other agreements
with community colleges, K-12 school districts, and private
businesses to facilitate the development and operation of articulated
career technical education pathways, as specified in Section 88532
of the Education Code.
Chapter 3. Financing
34191.15. An authority formed pursuant to this part may adopt
a redevelopment plan for a project area pursuant to this section.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, a
determination shall not be required to be made regarding blight
within the project area, and an action shall not be required to be
taken for the elimination of blight in connection with the creation
of a redevelopment plan for a project area. The redevelopment
plan shall terminate on a specified date not to exceed 30 years
from the date of the first issuance of bond indebtedness by the
agency authority. A project area shall include only the following
areas:
(a) For areas within the geographic boundaries of a metropolitan
planning organization where a sustainable communities strategy
has been adopted by the metropolitan planning organization, and
the State Air Resources Board, pursuant to subparagraph (H) of
paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the
Government Code, has accepted the metropolitan planning
organization’s determination that the sustainable communities
strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas
emission reduction targets:
(1) Transit priority areas where a transit priority project, as
defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, may be
constructed, provided that if the project area is based on proximity
97
— 4 —SB 1156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
to a planned major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor,
the stop or the corridor must be scheduled to be completed within
the planning horizon established by Section 450.322 of Title 23
of the Code of Federal Regulations. For purposes of this paragraph,
a transit priority area may include a military base reuse plan that
meets the definition of a transit priority area and a contaminated
site within a transit priority area.
(2) Areas that are small walkable communities, as defined in
paragraph (4) of subdivision (e) of Section 21094.5 of the Public
Resources Code. No more than one small walkable community
project area shall be designated within a city.
(b) Sites that have land use approvals, covenants, conditions
and restrictions, or other effective controls restricting the sites to
clean energy manufacturing, and sites that are consistent with the
sustainable communities strategy, if those sites are within the
geographic boundaries of a metropolitan planning organization.
Clean energy manufacturing consists of the manufacture of
components, parts, or materials for the generation of renewable
energy resources or for alternative fuel vehicles.
34191.16. Solely for purposes of Section 16 of Article XVI of
the California Constitution, a redevelopment plan adopted pursuant
to Section 34191.11 34191.15 may include a provision for the
receipt of tax increment funds according to Section 33670, provided
that the local government with land use jurisdiction has adopted
all of the following:
(a) A school mitigation plan to offset losses of property tax
revenue to schools serving the project area as a result of the
imposition of a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds.
The plan may include assessment districts, provisions of covenants,
conditions and restrictions, or other mechanisms. Except as
otherwise specified, the plan shall be approved by the fiscally
affected school districts. If the plan is not approved by the school
districts, it may be submitted by the authority established under
this part to the Department of Finance for approval. The department
shall approve the plan if there is no impact on the state budget
because of the provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 8 of Article
XVI of the California Constitution or if the impacts on the state
budget are not unacceptable.
(b) An analysis of the public service costs and
revenue-generating impact of new development with respect to
97
SB 1156
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
the provision of basic public services, including police, fire, and
rescue services. The plan shall include a strategy for mitigating
unfunded service impacts.
(c) A sustainable parking standards ordinance that restricts
parking in transit priority project areas.
(d) A provision requiring that 20 percent of the housing in the
project area be affordable to persons of low and moderate income.
(e) For transit priority areas and small walkable communities
within a metropolitan planning organization, a plan consistent with
the use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable
policies specified for the project area in the sustainable
communities strategy and that, for new residential construction,
provides a density of at least 20 dwelling units per net acre and
for nonresidential uses, provides a minimum floor area ratio of
0.75.
(f) Within small walkable communities outside a metropolitan
planning organization, a plan for new residential construction that
provides a density of at least 20 dwelling units per net acre and,
for nonresidential uses, provides a minimum floor area ratio of
0.75.
(g) For areas referred to in subdivision (e), the authority shall
obtain the metropolitan planning organization’s concurrence that
the plan is consistent with the use designation, density, building
intensity, and applicable policies for the project area in the
sustainable communities strategy.
34191.17. The authority shall approve any bond financing
under this division.
34191.18. The Low and Moderate Income Fund shall be
retained in the Sustainable Economic Development and Housing
Trust Fund for uses authorized under Section 33334.2. If the funds
are not contracted for use within 60 months from the effective date
of this section, the balance shall be transferred to an agency
designated by the Governor for use as grants to the authority for
the provision of affordable housing to low- and moderate-income
households. Any funds expended by the authority for affordable
housing from any of the granted funds shall be credited against
the 20-percent set-aside requirement under Section 33334.2.
34191.19. A state or local public pension fund system
authorized by state law or local charter, respectively, including,
but not limited to, the Public Employees’ Retirement System, the
97
— 6 —SB 1156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
State Teachers’ Retirement System, a system established under
the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Chapter 3
(commencing with Section 31450) of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title
3 of the Government Code, or an independent system, may invest
capital in the public infrastructure projects and private commercial
and residential developments undertaken by an authority.
34191.20. (a) An authority may exercise the full powers
granted under Chapter 2.8 (commencing with Section 53395) of
Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code and the
Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4
(commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of
Title 1 of the Government Code).
(b) An authority may implement a local transactions and use
tax under Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2
of the Revenue and Taxation Code, except that the resolution
authorizing the tax may designate the use of the proceed proceeds
of the tax.
(c) An authority may issue bonds paid for with authority
proceeds, which shall be deemed to be special funds to be expended
by the authority for the purposes of carrying out this part.
SEC. 2. Section 21094.5 of the Public Resources Code is
amended to read:
21094.5. (a) (1) If an environmental impact report was
certified for a planning level decision of a city or county, the
application of this division to the approval of an infill project shall
be limited to the effects on the environment that (A) are specific
to the project or to the project site and were not addressed as
significant effects in the prior environmental impact report or (B)
substantial new information shows the effects will be more
significant than described in the prior environmental impact report.
A lead agency’s determination pursuant to this section shall be
supported by substantial evidence.
(2) An effect of a project upon the environment shall not be
considered a specific effect of the project or a significant effect
that was not considered significant in a prior environmental impact
report, or an effect that is more significant than was described in
the prior environmental impact report if uniformly applicable
development policies or standards adopted by the city, county, or
the lead agency, would apply to the project and the lead agency
makes a finding, based upon substantial evidence, that the
97
SB 1156
— 7 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
development policies or standards will substantially mitigate that
effect.
(b) If an infill project would result in significant effects that are
specific to the project or the project site, or if the significant effects
of the infill project were not addressed in the prior environmental
impact report, or are more significant than the effects addressed
in the prior environmental impact report, and if a mitigated negative
declaration or a sustainable communities environmental assessment
could not be otherwise adopted, an environmental impact report
prepared for the project analyzing those effects shall be limited as
follows:
(1) Alternative locations, densities, and building intensities to
the project need not be considered.
(2) Growth inducing impacts of the project need not be
considered.
(c) This section applies to an infill project that satisfies both of
the following:
(1) The project satisfies any of the following:
(A) Is consistent with the general use designation, density,
building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project
area in either a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative
planning strategy for which the State Air Resources Board,
pursuant to subparagraph (H) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b)
of Section 65080 of the Government Code, has accepted a
metropolitan planning organization’s determination that the
sustainable communities strategy or the alternative planning
strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas
emission reduction targets.
(B) Consists of a small walkable community project located in
an area designated by a city for that purpose.
(C) Is located within the boundaries of a metropolitan planning
organization that has not yet adopted a sustainable communities
strategy or alternative planning strategy, and the project has a
residential density of at least 20 units per net acre or a floor area
ratio of at least 0.75.
(2) Satisfies all applicable statewide performance standards
contained in the guidelines adopted pursuant to Section 21094.5.5.
(d) This section applies after the Secretary of the Natural
Resources Agency adopts and certifies the guidelines establishing
statewide standards pursuant to Section 21094.5.5.
97
— 8 —SB 1156
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(e) For the purposes of this section, the following terms mean
the following:
(1) “Infill project” means a project that meets the following
conditions:
(A) Consists of any one, or combination, of the following uses:
(i) Residential.
(ii) Retail or commercial, where no more than one-half of the
project area is used for parking.
(iii) A transit station.
(iv) A school.
(v) A public office building.
(B) Is located within an urban area on a site that has been
previously developed, or on a vacant site where at least 75 percent
of the perimeter of the site adjoins, or is separated only by an
improved public right-of-way from, parcels that are developed
with qualified urban uses.
(2) “Planning level decision” means the enactment or
amendment of a general plan, community plan, specific plan, or
zoning code.
(3) “Prior environmental impact report” means the
environmental impact report certified for a planning level decision,
as supplemented by any subsequent or supplemental environmental
impact reports, negative declarations, or addenda to those
documents.
(4) “Small walkable community project” means a project that
is located in a small walkable community project area. A small
walkable community project area means an area within an
incorporated city that is not within the boundary of a metropolitan
planning organization and meets all the following requirements:
(A) Has a project area of approximately one-quarter-mile
diameter of contiguous land completely within the existing
incorporated boundaries of the city.
(B) Has a project area that includes a residential area adjacent
to a retail downtown area.
(C) The project area has an average net density of at least eight
dwelling units per net acre or a floor area ratio for retail or
commercial use of not less than 0.50. For purposes of this
subparagraph: (i) “Floor area ratio” means the ratio of gross
building area (GBA) of development, exclusive of structured
parking areas, proposed for the project divided by the total net lot
97
SB 1156
— 9 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
area (NLA); (ii) “gross building area” means the sum of all finished
areas of all floors of a building included within the outside faces
of its exterior walls; and (iii) “net lot area” means the area of a lot
excluding publicly dedicated land, private streets that meet local
standards, and other public use areas as determined by the local
land use authority.
(5) “Urban area” includes either an incorporated city or an
unincorporated area that is completely surrounded by one or more
incorporated cities that meets both of the following criteria:
(A) The population of the unincorporated area and the
population of the surrounding incorporated cities equal a population
of 100,000 or more.
(B) The population density of the unincorporated area is equal
to, or greater than, the population density of the surrounding cities.
O
97
— 10 —SB 1156
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN
AUTHOR: steinberg
VERSION: 3/29/12
Analysis by: Carrie Cornwell
FISCAL: yes
Hearing date: April 24, 2012
SUBJECT:
Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority
DESCRIPTION:
This bill authorizes a city and county that included the territory of a redevelopment agency
to form a Community Development and Housing Joint Powers Authority to carry out
Community Redevelopment Law, using the assets of a former redevelopment agency as well
as new revenues that the bill authorizes.
ANALYSIS:
Historically, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed a local government to establish a
redevelopment area and capture all of the increase in property taxes generated within the area
(referred to as "tax increment") over a period of decades. The law requires redevelopment
agencies to deposit 20 percent of tax increment into a Low and Moderate Income Housing
Fund (L&M fund) to be used to increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of low
and moderate income housing available at an affordable housing cost.
In 2011, the Legislature enacted two bills, AB 26X (Blumenfield) and AB 27X (Blumenfield),
Chapters 5 and 6, respectively, of the First Extraordinary Session. AB 26X eliminated
redevelopment agencies and established procedures for winding down the agencies, paying off
enforceable obligations, and disposing of agency assets. AB 26X established successor
agencies, typically the city that established the agency, to take control of all redevelopment
agency assets, properties, and other items of value. Successor agencies are to dispose of an
agency's assets as directed by an oversight board, made up of representatives of local taxing
entities, with the proceeds transferred to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing
agencies within each county.
AB 26X also included provisions allowing the host city or county of a dissolving
redevelopment agency to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the
agency, except for funds on deposit in the agency's L&M fund, and thus become a successor
housing agency. If the host city or county chooses not to become the successor housing
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
agency, a local housing authority or the state's Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) may do so.
AB 27X allowed redevelopment agencies to avoid elimination if they made payments to
schools in the current budget year and in future years. In December 2011, the California
Supreme Court in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB 26X and
overturned AB 27X. As a result, all of the state's roughly 400 redevelopment agencies
dissolved on February 1, 2012 and local jurisdictions are in the process of implementing AB
26X's provisions to distribute former redevelopment assets and pay its remaining obligations.
SB 375 (Steinberg), Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008, required the Air Resources Board
(ARB), by September 30, 2010, to provide each region that has a metropolitan planning
organization (MPO) with a greenhouse gas emission reduction target for the automobile and
light truck sector for 2020 and 2035, respectively. Each MPO, in turn, is required to include
within its regional transportation plan a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) designed to
achieve the ARB targets for greenhouse gas emission reduction. Each MPO must submit its
SCS to ARB for review. ARB must accept or reject the MPO's determination that the SCS
submitted would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.
This bill:
1. Permits a city and county representing the geographic territory covering the area served
by a former redevelopment agency to form a Community Development and Housing Joint
Powers Authority (authority) after July 1, 2012 to carry out the Community Redevelopment
Law. If a county formed a redevelopment agency, then the county may form an authority.
An authority so formed may adopt a redevelopment plan for a project area. This plan must
terminate on a specified date not more than 30 years after the first issuance of bond
indebtedness by the authority.
2. Limits possible project areas to only the following:
a. Within an MPO. For regions with an adopted SCS that ARB has accepted, possible project
areas may include transit priority areas identified in a SCS and for each jurisdiction, one small
walkable community, as defined.
b. Within or outside of an MPO. Sites that have land use approvals or other controls that
restrict the sites to clean energy manufacturing and are consistent with the SCS strategy,
where applicable. The bill defines clean energy manufacturing as the manufacture of
components, parts, or materials for the generation of renewal energy resources for alternative
fuel vehicles.
If the project area is based on proximity to a planned major transit stop or a high-quality
transit corridor, the stop or the corridor must be scheduled to be completed within the
planning horizon established by specified federal regulations governing the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
The bill specifies that a transit priority area can include a military base reuse plan that
meets the definition of a transit priority area and a contaminated site within a transit priority
area.
3. Retains in the Sustainable Economic Development and Housing Trust Fund, which can be
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
created under SB 1151, also on today's agenda, the existing L&M fund of the former
redevelopment agency for use in accordance with existing redevelopment law. If the L&M
funds are not contracted for use within 60 months from the effective date of this bill, then the
local agency shall transfer the L&M fund monies to an agency designated by the governor for
use as grants to the authority for the provision of affordable housing.
4. Allows a redevelopment plan adopted pursuant to this bill to include a provision for the
receipt of tax increment funds provided that the local government with land use jurisdiction
has adopted all of the following:
a. A school mitigation plan, which fiscally affected school districts must approve, to offset
the loss of property tax revenue to schools that serve the project area. If the fiscally affected
school districts do not approve this plan, then the Department of Finance may approve it and
must do so if there is no impact on the state budget.
b. An analysis of public service costs and the revenue-generating impact of new
development with respect to the provision of basic public services, including police and fire
services.
c. A sustainable parking standards ordinance that restricts parking in transit priority project
areas.
d. A requirement that 20 percent of the housing in the project area be affordable to persons
of low and moderate income.
e. Within an MPO for transit priority areas and small walkable communities, a plan must be
consistent with the land use policies in the SCS, and the MPO must concur in this finding. In
addition, the plan must require a density of at least 20 dwelling units per net acre, and for
nonresidential uses set a minimum floor area ration of 0.75.
f. Outside of an MPO, a plan for new residential construction shall provide a density of at
least 20 dwelling units per acre, and for nonresidential uses set a minimum floor area ration of
0.75.
5. Permits an authority to enter into financial agreements with community colleges, school
districts, and private businesses to facilitate the development and operation of articulated
career educational pathways.
6. Permits a state or local public pension fund to invest in public infrastructure projects and
private commercial and residential development that an authority undertakes.
7. Authorizes an authority to implement a local transactions and use tax, above the state's
base 7.25 percent sales and use tax, provided that the resolution authorizing the tax
designates the use of the proceeds of the tax.
8. Authorizes an authority to issue bonds paid for with authority proceeds in order to carry
out the provisions of this bill.
9. Authorizes an authority to exercise the powers of an infrastructure financing district to
divert property tax increment revenues and issue bonds to pay for public works.
10. Allows an authority to finance infrastructure by issuing bonds and lending the proceeds
for public works, working capital, and insurance programs as provided in the Marks-Roos Local
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
Bond Pooling Act.
COMMENTS:
1. Purpose. The author introduced this bill to set forth a new vision of local economic
development and housing policy for the 21st century, focused on building sustainable
communities and creating the high skill, high wage jobs that are the key to our future
prosperity.
The purpose of bringing together the cities and the counties as equal partners in an
inclusive governance structure is to correct the old model of redevelopment that pitted cities
against counties and schools for limited tax revenues. Both cities and counties have land use
authority, and both share responsibility for directing growth toward infill and transit-oriented
development consistent with SB 375 of 2008.
The author asserts that this bill will encourage cooperation, not competition, between cities
and counties in furtherance of sustainable economic development.
This bill recognizes that economic development requires investments both in the physical
capital of our infrastructure and the human capital of our workforce, and therefore authorizes
financial agreements with community colleges, K-12 school districts, and industry to advance
career education and credentialing programs.
2. How much area does the bill cover ? This bill provides for the creation of new Community
Development and Housing Joint Powers Authorities to take over the assets of the former
redevelopment agencies, to set up a new system of tax increment financing with less impact to
the state's finances, to confer new revenue authority, and to retain all the other powers that
redevelopment agencies possessed under state law, except it significantly limits the areas that
would qualify as project areas. This bill explicitly states that these project areas need not be
blighted, but limits project areas to clean energy manufacturing sites and, for cities and
counties within a MPO, to just a single small walkable community in each jurisdiction plus
transit priority areas.
It is unclear how much area within the state would actually meet these qualifications,
because:
The bill defines a clean energy manufacturing site as one with existing land use controls to
restrict the site to clean energy manufacturing, which the bill deems to consist of
"components, parts, or materials for the generation of renewable energy resources for
alternative fuel vehicles." This definition provides no assurance that the clean energy
subsidized through this bill would indeed further or even comport with existing state policy and
laws on greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution emissions, or renewal energy.
The committee may wish to define better what would qualify as "clean energy"
manufacturing for purposes of this bill.
The referenced definition of small walkable community that the bill uses states that a small
walkable community cannot be in the area of a MPO, but the bill's provisions describing
possible project areas specifically allow small walkable communities within MPOs. The
committee may wish to amend this bill to clarify whether small walkable communities may be
included in a project area.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (4 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
SB 375 provided for the creation of transit priority areas, but the financial incentives in this
bill could lead over time to a proliferation of these as a means to access the many powers
conferred to an authority created under this bill.
1. Housing provisions raise many questions. This bill retains with the new authorities and
trust fund, created in SB 1151, also on today's agenda, the existing L&M fund of the former
redevelopment agency for use in accordance with existing redevelopment law. The bill further
provides that if the authority does not contract for use of the L&M funds within 60 months
from the effective date of this bill, then the local agency shall transfer the L&M fund monies to
an agency designated by the governor for use as grants to the authority for the provision of
affordable housing. These housing provisions raise numerous questions, including:
Existing law prescribes a process for ensuring that redevelopment agencies spend their L&M
funds appropriately and in a timely process over four-year periods (known as the excess
surplus law). Why does this bill provide five years from the effective date of this bill for
contracting to expend these funds, and is this meant to replace existing law for existing L&M
balances?
Does the bill mean for these provisions to govern new L&M revenues accruing from new tax
increment financing or just the remaining, unencumbered L&M fund balance?
Given that the tax increment generated from this bill would be much less than that
generated from redevelopment project areas, because at least the school share of the property
tax would be excluded, is a 20% set aside for the L&M fund sufficient to support an affordable
housing program?
To what agency would the governor transfer unexpended L&M balances?
Why does the bill return L&M funds back as grants to the very entities that did not spend
the money on affordable housing in the first place?
Finally, this bill also requires that 20 percent of the housing in the project area be affordable
to persons of low and moderate income. To whom will these units be affordable and how will
this requirement mesh with existing inclusionary and production requirements in the
Community Redevelopment Law?
1. Where are the SB 450 fixes ? Last year the Legislature passed SB 450 (Lowenthal), which
substantively reformed how redevelopment agencies spend their L&M funds. That bill passed
this committee on April 5, 2011 by a 9-0 vote, but the governor vetoed SB 450, deeming it
premature in light of the then pending Supreme Court decision on AB 26X and AB 27X in
California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos. This bill, however, proposes restoring the
use of the redevelopment law, including its housing provisions, but without the changes that
SB 450 would have made. The committee or the author may therefore wish to amend this bill
to include the reforms SB 450 proposed to how redevelopment agencies spend their housing
dollars.
2. Urgency clause needed. This bill lets cities and counties form Community Development
and Housing Joint Powers
Authorities to administer economic development and housing programs after July 1, 2012.
This timing is necessary because successor agencies are working now to distribute those
assets.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (5 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 1156: Bill Analysis - Senate Trans & Housing Committee - 04/24/2012
But because this bill does not include an urgency clause, its provisions will not take effect
until January 1, 2013. The committee may wish to consider amending the bill to include an
urgency clause.
3. Technical Amendments.
On page 4, line 26, delete "body" and insert "bodies" On page 5, line 23, delete "agency"
and insert "authority" On page 6, line 17, delete "34191.11" and insert "34191.15" On page 7,
line 13, after "per" insert "net" On page 8, line 13, delete "proceed" and insert "proceeds" On
page 9, line 32, after "per" insert "net" On page 11, line 7, after "per" insert "net"
1. Committee of second referral. The Rules Committee referred this bill to the Governance
and Finance Committee and to the Transportation and Housing Committee. This bill passed
that committee on April 18 by a 6 to 3 vote. The Governance and Finance Committee's
analysis and hearing of the bill dealt primarily with the provisions of the bill related to the local
government finance provisions, leaving the housing provisions for review in this committee.
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, April 18, 2012)
SUPPORT:
BRIDGE Housing California Infill Builders Association California State Association of Counties
DMB Pacific Ventures Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy Mission Bay Development Group
OPPOSED:
California Special Districts Association Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSTRH_vrd20120424_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (6 of 6) [5/2/2012 3:56:30 PM]
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, 2012
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 11, 2012
SENATE BILL No. 986
1
2
Introduced by Senator Dutton
(Coauthor: Senator Cannella)
January 31, 2012
1
2
3
An act to amend Sections 34177 and 34180 of the Health and Safety
Code, relating to redevelopment, and declaring the urgency thereof, to
take effect immediately.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 986, as amended, Dutton. Redevelopment: bond proceeds.
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community
development agencies, as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the
designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires
that successor entities perform certain duties, including, among others,
remitting unencumbered funds of that agency to the county
auditor-controller, and overseeing the use of bond proceeds. Existing
law requires each successor agency to have an oversight board that is
composed of 7 members who meet certain qualifications. Existing law
requires the oversight board to approve certain actions of the successor
agency.
This bill would require that unencumbered balances of funds that are
derived from tax exempt bond proceeds be used in accordance with the
requirements of this bill. This bill would also require that the proceeds
of bonds issued by a former redevelopment agency on or before
December 31, 2010, be used by the successor agency for the purposes
for which the bonds were sold pursuant to an enforceable obligation,
as defined, that was entered into either by the former redevelopment
97
agency prior to its dissolution, or is entered into by the successor agency
by December 31, 2014. This bill would also provide that if the bond
proceeds are not subject to an enforceable obligation, or if the purpose
for which the bonds were sold can no longer be achieved, then the bond
proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase outstanding
bonds on the open market for cancellation.
This bill would also authorize the oversight board to approve of the
establishment of an enforceable obligation with respect to bond proceeds
if certain requirements are met, including, among others, if that
obligation is reasonably in furtherance of the purposes for which the
bonds were sold.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an
urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SECTION 1. Section 34177 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34177. Successor agencies are required to do all of the
following:
(a) Continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations.
(1) On and after February 1, 2012, and until a Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule becomes operative, only payments
required pursuant to an enforceable obligations payment schedule
shall be made. The initial enforceable obligation payment schedule
shall be the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment agency
under Section 34169. However, payments associated with
obligations excluded from the definition of enforceable obligations
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 34171 shall be
excluded from the enforceable obligations payment schedule and
be removed from the last schedule adopted by the redevelopment
agency under Section 34169 prior to the successor agency adopting
it as its enforceable obligations payment schedule pursuant to this
subdivision. The enforceable obligation payment schedule may
be amended by the successor agency at any public meeting and
shall be subject to the approval of the oversight board as soon as
the board has sufficient members to form a quorum.
97
— 2 —SB 986
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(2) The Department of Finance and the Controller shall each
have the authority to require any documents associated with the
enforceable obligations to be provided to them in a manner of their
choosing. Any taxing entity, the department, and the Controller
shall each have standing to file a judicial action to prevent a
violation under this part and to obtain injunctive or other
appropriate relief.
(3) Commencing on May 1, 2012, only those payments listed
in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule may be made by
the successor agency from the funds specified in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule. In addition, commencing May 1,
2012, the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall supersede
the Statement of Indebtedness, which shall no longer be prepared
nor have any effect under the Community Redevelopment Law.
(4) Nothing in the act adding this part is to be construed as
preventing a successor agency, with the prior approval of the
oversight board, as described in Section 34179, from making
payments for enforceable obligations from sources other than those
listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
(5) From February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, a successor agency
shall have no authority and is hereby prohibited from accelerating
payment or making any lump-sum payments that are intended to
prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required
prior to the effective date of this part.
(b) Maintain reserves in the amount required by indentures,
trust indentures, or similar documents governing the issuance of
outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(c) Perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable
obligation.
(d) Remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency
funds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing
entities, including, but not limited to, the unencumbered balance
of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a former
redevelopment agency. In making the distribution, the county
auditor-controller shall utilize the same methodology for allocation
and distribution of property tax revenues provided in Section
34188. Notwithstanding the requirements of this subdivision, if
the unencumbered balance of funds is derived from tax exempt
bond proceeds, those balances shall be used in accordance with
the requirements of subdivision (i).
97
SB 986
— 3 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(e) Dispose of assets and properties of the former redevelopment
agency as directed by the oversight board; provided, however, that
the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to
transfer ownership of certain assets pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 34181. The disposal is to be done expeditiously and in a
manner aimed at maximizing value. Proceeds from asset sales and
related funds that are no longer needed for approved development
projects or to otherwise wind down the affairs of the agency, each
as determined by the oversight board, shall be transferred to the
county auditor-controller for distribution as property tax proceeds
under Section 34188.
(f) Enforce all former redevelopment agency rights for the
benefit of the taxing entities, including, but not limited to,
continuing to collect loans, rents, and other revenues that were due
to the redevelopment agency.
(g) Effectuate transfer of housing functions and assets to the
appropriate entity designated pursuant to Section 34176.
(h) Expeditiously wind down the affairs of the redevelopment
agency pursuant to the provisions of this part and in accordance
with the direction of the oversight board.
(i) Continue to oversee development of properties until the
contracted work has been completed or the contractual obligations
of the former redevelopment agency can be transferred to other
parties. Bond proceeds derived from bonds sold on or before
December 31, 2010, shall be used for the purposes for which the
bonds were sold, if and to the extent that the successor agency is
either performing an obligation required pursuant to any
enforceable obligation entered into by the former redevelopment
agency, or is performing an enforceable obligation entered into by
the successor agency on or before December 31, 2014, to fulfill
the purposes for which the bonds were sold by the dissolved
redevelopment agency; provided, however, that this section shall
not be interpreted to grant to a successor agency the power of
eminent domain. Any amount of bond proceeds derived from bonds
sold on or before December 31, 2010, not subject to an enforceable
obligation shall be used to defease the bonds or to purchase
outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation. If the
purposes for which bonds that were sold by the dissolved
redevelopment agency on or before December 31, 2010, can no
longer be achieved, then the proceeds shall be used to defease the
97
— 4 —SB 986
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
bonds or to purchase outstanding bonds on the open market for
cancellation.
(j) Prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to
the oversight board for its approval. The proposed administrative
budget shall include all of the following:
(1) Estimated amounts for successor agency administrative costs
for the upcoming six-month fiscal period.
(2) Proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in
paragraph (1).
(3) Proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations
services provided by a city, county, city and county, or other entity.
(k) Provide administrative cost estimates, from its approved
administrative budget that are to be paid from property tax revenues
deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the
county auditor-controller for each six-month fiscal period.
(l) (1) Before each six-month fiscal period, prepare a
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule in accordance with the
requirements of this paragraph. For each recognized obligation,
the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall identify one
or more of the following sources of payment:
(A) Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.
(B) Bond proceeds.
(C) Reserve balances.
(D) Administrative cost allowance.
(E) The Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, but only to
the extent no other funding source is available or when payment
from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation
or by the provisions of this part.
(F) Other revenue sources, including rents, concessions, asset
sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived
from the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the
oversight board in accordance with this part.
(2) A Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall not be
deemed valid unless all of the following conditions have been met:
(A) A draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
prepared by the successor agency for the enforceable obligations
of the former redevelopment agency by March 1, 2012. From
October 1, 2011, to July 1, 2012, the initial draft of that schedule
shall project the dates and amounts of scheduled payments for
each enforceable obligation for the remainder of the time period
97
SB 986
— 5 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
during which the redevelopment agency would have been
authorized to obligate property tax increment had that
redevelopment agency not been dissolved, and shall be reviewed
and certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated
pursuant to Section 34182.
(B) The certified Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule is
submitted to and duly approved by the oversight board.
(C) A copy of the approved Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule is submitted to the county auditor-controller and both
the Controller’s office and the Department of Finance and be posted
on the successor agency’s Internet Web site.
(3) The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule shall be
forward looking to the next six months. The first Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule shall be submitted to the Controller’s
office and the Department of Finance by April 15, 2012, for the
period of January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2012, inclusive. Former
redevelopment agency enforceable obligation payments due, and
reasonable or necessary administrative costs due or incurred, prior
to January 1, 2012, shall be made from property tax revenues
received in the spring of 2011 property tax distribution, and from
other revenues and balances transferred to the successor agency.
SEC. 2. Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code is
amended to read:
34180. All of the following successor agency actions shall first
be approved by the oversight board:
(a) The establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding
loans where the terms have not been specified prior to the date of
this part.
(b) Refunding of outstanding bonds or other debt of the former
redevelopment agency by successor agencies in order to provide
for savings or to finance debt service spikes; provided, however,
that no additional debt is created and debt service is not accelerated.
(c) Setting aside of amounts in reserves as required by
indentures, trust indentures, or similar documents governing the
issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
(d) Merging of project areas.
(e) Continuing the acceptance of federal or state grants, or other
forms of financial assistance from either public or private sources,
where assistance is conditioned upon the provision of matching
97
— 6 —SB 986
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
funds, by the successor entity as successor to the former
redevelopment agency, in an amount greater than 5 percent.
(f) (1) If a city, county, or city and county wishes to retain any
properties or other assets for future redevelopment activities,
funded from its own funds and under its own auspices, it must
reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to
provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base
property tax, as determined pursuant to Section 34188, for the
value of the property retained.
(2) If no other agreement is reached on valuation of the retained
assets, the value will be the fair market value as of the 2011
property tax lien date as determined by the county assessor.
(g) Establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule.
(h) A request by the successor agency to enter into an agreement
with the city, county, or city and county that formed the
redevelopment agency that it is succeeding.
(i) A request by a successor agency or taxing entity to pledge,
or to enter into an agreement for the pledge of, property tax
revenues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34178.
(j) The establishment of an enforceable obligation with respect
to bond proceeds from bonds sold on or before December 31, 2010,
pursuant to subdivision (i) of Section 34177. The oversight board
may approve the establishment of an enforceable obligation with
respect to bond proceeds if both of the following conditions are
met:
(1) The obligation is reasonably in furtherance of the purposes
for which the bonds were sold.
(2) The obligation is consistent with one or more of the
following:
(A) The obligation is required in order to meet a federal or state
matching funds requirement in which federal or state funds have
already been committed, and is specific to the project requiring
the obligation.
(B) The obligation is required in order to meet the requirements
for the expenditure of a local general obligation bond approved
by the voters.
(C) (i) The obligation is required to complete a project specific
to critical public infrastructure that is in, or provides benefit to,
the project area of the former redevelopment agency and the
97
SB 986
— 7 —
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
evidence of the benefit to the community in proceeding with the
obligation substantially outweighs the resulting delay in the
distribution of tax increment to the impacted taxing entities.
(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph, “critical public
infrastructure” does not include any of the following:
(I) An automobile dealership that will be or is on a parcel of
land that has not previously been developed for urban use.
(II) A development project or business that, either directly or
indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves, rehabilitates, or replaces
property that is or would be used for a golf course or for a
racetrack, speedway or other racing venue.
(III) A development project or business that acquires, constructs,
improves, rehabilitates, or replaces property that is or would be
used for a stadium, coliseum, arena, ballpark or other sports facility
that is intended for use by a professional sports franchise.
(IV) A development project or business that, either directly or
indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves, rehabilitates, or replaces
property that is or would be used for gambling or gaming of any
kind whatsoever, including, but not limited to, casinos, gaming
clubs, bingo operations, or any facility in which banked or
percentage games, any form of gambling device, or lotteries, other
than the California State Lottery, are or will be played.
(V) A development project or business that, either directly or
indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves, rehabilitates, or replaces
property that is or would be used for retail, entertainment, or other
private purpose unrelated to public works, such as bridges, parks,
roads, municipal buildings, dams, railroads, schools, hospitals,
and other long-term, public physical assets and facilities.
SEC. 3. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order to provide guidance to the successor agencies on the
use of bond proceeds, it is necessary for this act to take effect
immediately.
O
97
— 8 —SB 986
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee -
04/18/2012
BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
BILL NO: SB 986 HEARING: 4/18/12
AUTHOR: Dutton FISCAL: Yes
VERSION: 4/11/12 TAX LEVY: No
CONSULTANT: Weinberger
SUCCESSOR AGENCIES AND BOND PROCEEDS (URGENCY)
Allows successor agencies to keep former redevelopment agencies' bond proceeds and enter
into new enforceable obligations funded by bond proceeds.
Background and Existing Law
Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local officials to set up
redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and adopt redevelopment plans, and finance
redevelopment activities.
A redevelopment agency kept the property tax increment revenues generated from
increases in property values within a redevelopment project area. As a redevelopment project
area's assessed valuation grew above its base-year value, the resulting property tax revenues
- the property tax increment - went to the RDA instead of going to the underlying local
governments. When a redevelopment agency diverted property tax revenues from a school
district, the State General Fund paid the difference.
Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed
eliminating RDAs and returning billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities,
and counties to fund core services. Among the statutory changes that the Legislature adopted
to implement the 2011-12 budget, AB X1 26 (Blumenfield, 2011) dissolved all RDAs.
AB X1 26 established successor agencies to manage the process of unwinding former RDAs'
affairs. With the exception of seven cities that chose not to serve as successor agencies, the
city or county that created each former RDA now serves as that RDA's successor agency. Each
successor agency has an oversight board that is responsible for supervising it and approving
its actions. Oversight boards are comprised of seven members, including city, county, special
district, and school district representatives, appointed by local governments that serve the
area. The Department of Finance can review and request reconsideration of an oversight
board's decisions.
One of the successor agencies' primary responsibilities is to make payments for enforceable
obligations entered into by former RDAs. Each successor agency must, every six months, draft
a list of enforceable obligations that are payable during a subsequent six month period. This
"Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule" (ROPS) must be adopted by the oversight board
and is subject to review by the county auditor-controller and the Department of Finance.
Obligations listed on a ROPS are payable from a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund,
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (1 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
which contains the revenues that would have been allocated as tax increment to a former
RDA. Successor agencies cannot enter into new enforceable obligations.
RDAs issued bonds to pay for acquiring and developing property and building public
infrastructure to redevelop blighted areas. Former RDAs' long-term debt is mostly in the form
of tax allocation bonds, which are payable from property tax increment revenues. Many former
RDAs held balances of unencumbered bond proceeds that were intended to fund future
redevelopment activities, but were not needed to meet those RDAs' existing obligations.
Successor agencies must dispose of former RDAs' assets, at an oversight board's direction,
pursuant to specific statutory requirements. Successor agencies must remit unencumbered
balances of RDA funds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to local taxing entities in
the county. Agencies must use bond proceeds for the purposes for which the bonds were sold
unless those purposes cannot be achieved, in which case the proceeds can be used to defease
the bonds. Defeasing bonds is a method of retiring bond debt by buying and holding risk-free
U.S.
Treasury securities in an amount that is sufficient to cover all principal and interest
payments on the outstanding bonds.
Local government officials worry that remitting unencumbered bond proceeds to county
auditor-controllers for allocation to local taxing entities may violate federal tax-exempt bond
requirements and restrictions on the use of bond proceeds imposed by the terms of individual
bond agreements. They also argue that low interest rates make defeasing former RDAs' bonds
prohibitively expensive. They want legislators to give successor agencies more flexibility in
disposing of former RDAs' unencumbered bond proceeds.
Proposed Law
Senate Bill 986 imposes requirements on a successor agency's use of the unencumbered
balance of funds derived from tax exempt bond proceeds.
SB 986 requires successor agencies to use bond proceeds derived from bonds sold on or
before December 31, 2010 for the purposes for which the bonds were sold if the successor
agency is either: Performing an obligation required pursuant to any enforceable obligation
entered into by the former redevelopment agency, or Performing an enforceable obligation the
successor agency entered into on or before December 31, 2014, to fulfill the purposes for
which the bonds were sold by the dissolved redevelopment agency.
SB 986 prohibits a specified statute from being interpreted to grant the power of eminent
domain to a successor agency.
With respect to bond proceeds from bonds sold on or before December 31, 2010, if the
purposes for which bonds that were sold by a former redevelopment agency cannot be
achieved, SB 986 requires a successor agency to use the bond proceeds to either defease the
bonds or purchase outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
SB 986 requires that a successor agency must use any amount of bond proceeds from
bonds sold after December 31, 2010 that are not subject to an enforceable obligation to either
defease the bonds or purchase outstanding bonds on the open market for cancellation.
SB 986 requires a successor agency's oversight board, on or before December 31, 2014, to
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (2 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
approve the agency's establishment of an enforceable obligation with respect to bond proceeds
from bonds sold on or before December 31, 2010, to fulfill the purposes for which bonds were
sold by a dissolved redevelopment agency. The bill allows an oversight board to approve an
enforceable obligation with respect to bond proceeds from bonds sold by a former RDA on or
before December 31, 2010 if:
The obligation is reasonably in furtherance of the purposes for which the bonds were sold;
and
The obligation is consistent with one or more of the following:
o The obligation is required in order to meet a federal or state matching funds requirement
in which federal or state funds have already been committed and is specific to the project
requiring the obligation; or
o The obligation is required in order to meet the requirements for the expenditure of a local
general obligation bond approved by the voters; or
o The obligation is required to complete a project specific to critical public infrastructure
that is in, or provides benefit to, the project area of the former redevelopment agency and the
evidence of the benefit to the community in proceeding with the obligation substantially
outweighs the resulting delay in the distribution of tax increment to the impacted taxing
entities.
SB 986 specifies that critical public infrastructure does not include: An automobile
dealership which will be or is on a parcel of land which has not previously been developed for
urban use.
A development or business that, either directly or indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves,
rehabilitates, or replaces property that is or would be used for a golf course or for a racetrack,
speedway or other racing venue.
A development or business that acquires, constructs, improves, rehabilitates, or replaces
property that is or would be used for a stadium, coliseum, arena, ballpark or other sports
facility that is intended for use by a professional sports franchise.
A development or business that, either directly or indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves,
rehabilitates, or replaces property that is or would be used for gambling or gaming of any kind,
including casinos, gaming clubs, bingo operations, or any facility wherein banked or
percentage games, any form of gambling device, or lotteries, other than the California State
Lottery, are or will be played.
A development or business that, either directly or indirectly, acquires, constructs, improves,
rehabilitates, or replaces property that is or would be used for retail, entertainment or other
private purpose unrelated to public works such as bridges, parks, roads, municipal buildings,
dams, railroads, schools, hospitals, and other, long-term, public physical assets and facilities.
State Revenue Impact
No estimate.
Comments
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (3 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
1. Purpose of the bill. State law offers successor agencies no good options for disposing of
billions of dollars of unspent RDA bond proceeds. If the interest rates that a successor agency
earns on securities it buys to defease bonds are significantly lower than the interest payments
on the bonds, the agency will lose a large amount of money on the transaction. If a successor
agency cannot spend unencumbered bond proceeds and chooses not to use the funds to
defease bonds, it must remit the proceeds to the county auditor-controller for distribution to
other taxing entities. Redistributing bond proceeds to other local governments would likely
violate federal law governing tax-exempt bonds and the terms of many specific bond
agreements. SB 986 prohibits unspent proceeds derived from tax exempt bonds from being
redistributed and provides successor agencies with alternative ways to use the funds.
By letting successor agencies enter into new enforceable obligations through 2014, SB 986
allows bond proceeds to finance former RDA projects that would not otherwise be completed.
By letting successor agencies use bond proceeds to purchase outstanding bonds on the open
market, SB 986 offers them a potentially less costly method to retire bonds issued by former
RDAs. SB 986 eliminates the cloud of uncertainty that hangs over former RDAs' unspent bond
proceeds, avoids costly litigation over reallocated bond proceeds, reduces the cost of retiring
former RDA bonds, and provides financing for projects that were stranded by RDAs'
dissolution.
2. Zero-sum game. Allocating former RDAs' assets is a zero-sum game; every reallocation
creates winners and losers. By allowing successor agencies to spend additional bond proceeds
on projects rather than on retiring outstanding debts, SB 986 grants a larger share of former
RDA assets to successor agencies and a smaller share to other local governments - including
school districts - than they would receive under current law. One fiscal loser will be the State
General Fund, which must backfill the revenues that the schools won't get. School districts in
which local property taxes equal or exceed the districts' revenue limits (the so-called "basic
aid" districts) also could be fiscal losers because the State General Fund won't fully backfill
their lower allocations. Other local taxing entities that will receive smaller allocations under SB
986 include counties and special districts that include former RDA project areas within their
jurisdictions.
3. Retirement incentives. To make it easier for successor agencies to retire former RDAs'
bonds, SB 986 lets successor agencies use unencumbered bond proceeds to buy bonds on the
open market. Allowing successor agencies to explore a wider range of options for retiring RDA
bonds could benefit local taxing entities and the State General Fund by expediting the debt
retirement process. For example, refunding former RDA bonds could make sense if the
refunding doesn't extend the term of the debt, saves debt service in each payment year, and
allocates the savings to local taxing entities. The Committee may wish to consider amending
SB 986 to allow successor agencies to use additional methods for retiring RDA bonds, subject
to oversight boards' approval.
4. Taxable vs. tax-exempt. SB 986's provisions govern a successor agency's use of
unencumbered proceeds from former RDAs' tax-exempt bonds. However, not all bonds issued
by former RDAs were tax-exempt. It is not clear what proportion of former RDAs'
unencumbered bond proceeds come from taxable bonds. However, based on data from earlier
this year, taxable bonds accounted for approximately 17% of RDAs' total outstanding bond
indebtedness. Under SB 986, unencumbered proceeds from taxable bonds could be reallocated
to taxing entities by a county auditor-controller. Some stakeholders remain concerned that
reallocating bond proceeds to taxing entities may violate the terms of specific bond
agreements. The Committee may wish to consider whether SB 986's requirements should also
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (4 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
apply to successor agencies' use of unencumbered bond proceeds from taxable bonds.
5. Technical amendment. To clarify SB 986's provisions, the Committee may wish to
consider making the following technical amendment: On page 8, line 33, strike out "business,"
and insert: "business that,"
6. Before and after. After Governor Brown proposed ending redevelopment, some RDA
officials tried to encumber as much future tax increment revenue as possible before any
changes to redevelopment law took effect. During the first six months of 2011, RDAs issued
about $1.5 billion in tax allocation bonds, a level of debt issuance greater than the $1.3 billion
that they issued during all 12 months of 2010.
Many bonds issued in 2011 required RDAs to pay interest rates than were significantly
higher than those on bonds issued in previous years. To avoid rewarding some RDAs' rush to
issue unnecessary and expensive debt, SB 986 makes a distinction between unspent proceeds
from RDA bonds sold before December 31, 2010 and unspent proceeds from bonds sold after
that date.
7. Urgency. Regular statutes take effect on the January following their enactment; bills
passed in 2012 take effect on January 1, 2013. The California Constitution allows bills with
urgency clauses to take effect immediately if they're needed for the public peace, health, and
safety.
SB 986 contains an urgency clause declaring the need for the bill to take effect
immediately.
8. Related bills. At its April 18 hearing, the Committee also will hear: SB 1056 (Hancock),
which expands the definition of "enforceable obligation" to include financial obligations related
to a project funded with both tax increment and federal school construction bonds.
SB 1151 (Steinberg), which creates an alternative process by which communities can use
their former redevelopment agencies' assets for economic development and housing purposes.
SB 1156 (Steinberg), which allows a Community Development and Housing Joint Powers
Authority, and some counties, to use tax increment financing and other local revenues to
finance specified local economic development activities.
Other bills that amend the statutes governing the disposition and use of former RDAs'
assets include: SB 1337 (Pavley), which allows a successor agency to retain former RDA land
that is a brownfield site for the purpose of hazardous substance remediation or removal.
AB 1585 (Perez), which makes numerous amendments to the statutes governing the
redevelopment dissolution process.
Support and Opposition (4/12/12)
Support: Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, Cities of Adelanto, Atascadero,
Bellflower, Blythe, Brea, Buena Park, Camarillo, Cerritos, Colton, Fairfield, Folsom, Glendora,
Grand Terrace, La Mirada, La Quinta, Lakewood, Lawndale, Lynnwood, Moorpark, Norwalk,
Ontario, Palm Desert, Paramount, Placentia, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, Rosemead,
Santa Cruz, Signal Hill, Simi Valley, South El Monte, Temecula, Thousand Oaks, Victorville,
Vista, and Whittier, California Contract Cities Association, California Redevelopment
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (5 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]
State Net | 2011 CA S 986: Bill Analysis - Senate Governance and Finance Committee - 04/18/2012
Association, League of California Cities.
Opposition: California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights, Counties of Los Angeles
and Santa Clara.
Copyright (c) 2012 State Net. All rights reserved.
http://client2.statenet.com/secure/pe/resources....ALYSIS_comSGOF_vrd20120418_seq00&no_text_utils=1 (6 of 6) [5/2/2012 4:00:04 PM]