HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02111986 - IO.3 _To•3
. R
TO- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Contra
February 10, 1986 Costa
DATE'. Status of Prospective Cancer Study and l ointy
SUBJECT: Establishment of a Health Review Board
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . Authorize the Health Services Director to convene a group of
experts to develop the nature and scope of a scientifically
valid prospective study of the incidence and causes of
cancer in at least the Bay Area, and prepare a grant
application to possible funding sources seeking funds to
conduct such a study, and report a proposed timetable for
the work of the study group to the Internal Operations
Committee on March 10.
2 . Authorize the Chairman to send letters to a list of experts
identified by the Health Services Director inviting them to
be a part of the effort to develop such a study protocol and
grant application.
3 . Direct the Health Services Director to make recommendations
to the Internal Operations Committee on March 10 regarding
the general composition, staffing, proposed charge and
duties of an advisory board to provide general community
input to the Health Services Department and the Board of
Supervisors in the areas of Public Health and Environmental
Health.
4 . Direct the Health Services Director to report to the
Internal Operations Committee on March 10 on the existing
statutory requirements for data to be reported to the Tumor
Registry.
BACKGROUND:
On December 10, 1985, the Board of Supervisors directed the
Assistant Health Services Director--Public Health to report to
our Committee on the status of the prospective cancer study,
whether or not the Tumor Registry is fulfilling its State mandate
and on the feasibility of establishing a Health Review Board.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
X APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): Ft
N cy C. Fanden
iunne lJ: McPeak
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 11 , 1986 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED February 11, 1986
Health Services Director _
Asst. Dir.--Public Health PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Asst. Dir,--Env. Health SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
M382/7-83 B `4 ,DEPUTY
Page 2
We met with the Health Services Director and Assistant Health
Services Director--Public Health on February 10 to review these
issues.
Dr. Brunner reviewed the history of the study of the incidence of
cancer in Contra Costa County and the continuing need for a
scientifically valid occupational/environmental cancer study
which would prospectively review all cases of cancer in a large
enough geographical area to make the study valid. He noted that
there appear to be few available funding sources. Dr. Brunner
recommended that a group of experts in the field needs to be
convened to design the nature and scope of such a study. The
group would, in effect, be preparing a grant application to
various potential funding sources since it is not feasible for
the County to fund such a study, particularly since it must
encompass at least the Bay Area in order to include enough cases
of cancer to be valid.
In terms of the Tumor Registry, Dr. Brunner noted that the County
had supported legislation during 1985 which was successful in
extending the Tumor Registry statewide. He noted that there have
been questions raised about the adequacy of the data gathered by
the Tumor Registry.
In regard to the Health Review Board, Supervisor Fanden noted the
need which has been expressed by the community for a
community-based, non-technical advisory committee to the Board of
Supervisors and the Health Services Department in areas dealing
generally with public health and environmental health issues
which are of concern to the community. Supervisor McPeak
suggested that such a group should be coordinated with the
Hazardous Materials Commission which is being recommended to the
Board by the Hazardous Waste Task Force and with the group which
is planning the implementation of AB 2185 in the County.
In response, Mr. Finucane suggested that he would like to discuss
the proposed composition, staffing, charge, and duties of such an
advisory board with his staff, and would be prepared to make
specific recommendations within a month.
Based on this discussion, our Committee is making the above
recommendations in the form of a status report on this subject.